{"meta":{"query_hash":"14c866f9963d","filters":{"venue":"Philo"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/14c866f9963d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philo"},"results":[{"id":"W1159254799","doi":"10.5840/philo201316212","title":"Layman’s Lapse: On an Incomplete Moral Argument for Theism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08484084240546812,"score_gpt":0.2601647275641592,"score_spread":0.17532388515869107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1159254799","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018715648,0.011989862,0.017249009,0.7521148,0.0026553706,0.00005687642,0.00009947608,0.00006280953,0.19705613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74689764,0.0051413523,0.012257602,0.18494014,0.0072710994,0.00031994347,0.00009089235,0.00020674389,0.042874556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946405,0.003357603,0.00010834035,0.0005702633,0.00087413524,0.00044911998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889066,0.008370782,0.00044843013,0.000572348,0.0012037802,0.0004981144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009578266,0.00053176965,0.000992843,0.0019460984,0.0068349713,0.0054286295,0.0018486441,0.010589892,0.0075379065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022439757,0.0005057549,0.0010409595,0.0008984361,0.028660957,0.011718054,0.004391836,0.018703077,0.0011074281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012884905,0.000007683963,0.000043358512,0.000021136511,0.0000032834282,0.000050605453,0.0006443101,0.00007188104,0.000024815066,0.9857993,0.012094954,0.0012257299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029126017,0.000013579543,0.00011239691,0.00018526701,0.0000074933737,0.000049543083,0.00073936535,0.00055095926,0.00012933389,0.9425049,0.05566351,0.000014521063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00721482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00423901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010589892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005595316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035305126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050655365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985575923","doi":"10.5840/philo20058115","title":"Theistic Replies to Rowe’s a Priori Argument for Atheism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"ROWE; Theism; Atheism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Agnosticism; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05199844951843739,"score_gpt":0.2648501780858846,"score_spread":0.21285172856744722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985575923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011972847,0.0025697981,0.011810839,0.5700124,0.0041387454,0.00003550172,0.00016130175,0.00009955621,0.39919895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6785701,0.0014572204,0.006398951,0.19561502,0.006470787,0.00016841023,0.00006845354,0.00022078621,0.11103041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707055,0.0013099688,0.00012438503,0.0004842995,0.0005440459,0.00046686066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542636,0.002546441,0.00034820178,0.00055704766,0.0008019234,0.00032003448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040389,0.0005457498,0.00083424366,0.0012812921,0.006467793,0.0056066327,0.0015028192,0.010825283,0.013003937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109798005,0.00047661513,0.0007791585,0.0007907064,0.023841435,0.007527127,0.005023664,0.015540489,0.0028111234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012387145,0.0000072003468,0.000054303484,0.000018184186,0.000006392278,0.000041899737,0.0013562122,0.00002463323,0.00003895542,0.9797046,0.017893536,0.00084167346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027056767,0.000010797248,0.00022601742,0.00007294209,0.000012145068,0.00018949463,0.0014142386,0.00020075373,0.00017988379,0.85620964,0.14142974,0.000027173961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031708418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049816174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013003937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028961971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001387164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04350251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275982711","doi":"10.5840/philo20101324","title":"Conscientious Refusals without Conscience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Conscience; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07220251378484821,"score_gpt":0.28999797550399914,"score_spread":0.21779546171915093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275982711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2816155,0.004154471,0.11500301,0.1513501,0.003184531,0.00035722958,0.0000942104,0.00012586694,0.444115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98526853,0.0003262964,0.0030210875,0.0056908056,0.00034400035,0.00013391268,0.000015959109,0.000024921132,0.00517438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593728,0.023963192,0.0017419417,0.00351462,0.008411475,0.0029959187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9359696,0.039545387,0.008507117,0.008880561,0.005081869,0.0020154018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031205026,0.00047346804,0.0006377022,0.0016466163,0.0047715707,0.0046312325,0.0016481393,0.0042797728,0.00468148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10650295,0.00025870325,0.0008970321,0.00080314593,0.043881103,0.0073815384,0.00697596,0.009149884,0.00051984144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017312903,0.000017289736,0.0009370354,0.000051087824,0.00000834296,0.00016504977,0.008061747,0.0001332551,0.000099035766,0.9835143,0.0011602473,0.0058353534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024868326,0.0000472974,0.001901112,0.0002900679,0.000011632963,0.00030509217,0.0050206087,0.0006290465,0.00032960187,0.96468496,0.026722997,0.00003274499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001367979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012770863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031205026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002941042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004066293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16502994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503062492","doi":"10.5840/philo20141712","title":"‘O God, O Montreal!’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.015040293830465668,"score_gpt":0.2761652692316829,"score_spread":0.2611249754012172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503062492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101940826,0.0066758995,0.0010861916,0.11068838,0.0029598754,0.000059073405,0.00040288962,0.00006780787,0.77611893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58727556,0.0027732835,0.00070304796,0.014765698,0.00032804738,0.000034725832,0.00011779447,0.00009155846,0.3939102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999637,0.00012440467,0.0000074634186,0.000041702267,0.000058932583,0.00013037225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963963,0.00006952216,0.000036795656,0.000021266833,0.000088472305,0.00014426692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006113097,0.00021525705,0.000120015335,0.00030000164,0.008693606,0.0027859253,0.00035464187,0.00096807367,0.022140838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011059163,0.00016311002,0.000072958275,0.00086501986,0.0049105664,0.0019133157,0.0011296178,0.002267675,0.0013120795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008000902,0.00003452107,0.009139809,0.00019227216,0.000012410589,0.001116343,0.17008957,0.00007353652,0.0014018846,0.49419463,0.27221516,0.05144983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056570743,0.000015968972,0.0059622796,0.000082247054,0.0000030076658,0.00018018817,0.05496441,0.000036155398,0.00021069645,0.0034222526,0.93510455,0.000012600742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36751404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5851132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.632486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005219618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005325783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7307497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}