{"meta":{"query_hash":"14c866f9963d","filters":{"venue":"Philo"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/14c866f9963d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philo"},"results":[{"id":"W1159254799","doi":"10.5840/philo201316212","title":"Layman’s Lapse: On an Incomplete Moral Argument for Theism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08484084240546812,"score_gpt":0.2601647275641592,"score_spread":0.17532388515869107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1159254799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44650155,0.00019299844,0.000037572474,0.030989492,0.0017315052,0.0010708397,0.00018619877,0.0002486985,0.5190412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013996,0.0000024685867,0.00009199515,0.0036802215,0.0019019312,0.00013230435,0.0000419539,0.000016729915,0.00399241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937683,0.000035443358,0.0001413162,0.00017500315,0.000072703115,0.00019867282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995388,0.00007422158,0.000051639818,0.00022115672,0.000050699728,0.00006353218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010910111,0.0001247156,0.00013859292,0.00004375743,0.0003066027,0.00007287579,0.00017636498,0.00003695919,0.005216084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009042079,0.000096099866,0.00006918451,0.000006939527,0.0001521668,0.00019091649,0.00002272384,0.00009234092,0.0009528112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032523614,0.00010703124,0.000043549393,0.00000949591,0.000024618588,5.792119e-7,0.0032411173,0.0000035466567,0.000026953297,0.9843356,0.010805792,0.0013691918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033916748,0.00041461564,0.00038544106,0.000009514214,0.000011220857,7.448725e-7,0.00012436025,0.0000776678,0.00006032553,0.70500606,0.29344004,0.00013080769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010585891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086883396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54363847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010504435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064429746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985575923","doi":"10.5840/philo20058115","title":"Theistic Replies to Rowe’s a Priori Argument for Atheism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"ROWE; Theism; Atheism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); A priori and a posteriori; Epistemology; Agnosticism; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05199844951843739,"score_gpt":0.2648501780858846,"score_spread":0.21285172856744722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985575923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10950956,0.0011413634,0.0007985397,0.13972703,0.002219223,0.0015283952,0.00025012353,0.00040042968,0.74442536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97233015,0.0000060372654,0.00046918422,0.0038492186,0.0034418122,0.00009591825,0.000009348071,0.000016626007,0.019781727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934626,0.000015629768,0.00015934874,0.00019886691,0.000070321395,0.00020958035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949986,0.000107339045,0.000043232078,0.00023584998,0.000048819693,0.00006492248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016081902,0.00012099085,0.00014807016,0.000049811006,0.0002923567,0.00004666164,0.00016005465,0.00003142297,0.0014814421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004768232,0.00009846517,0.00008346566,0.000011143375,0.00010300637,0.00008167141,0.00003355119,0.0000668951,0.0006762042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066955545,0.000065688524,0.000010577558,0.000012020056,0.000030861513,5.8407403e-7,0.012469663,0.000010537473,0.000027491247,0.9758129,0.0075271707,0.003965508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007019,0.00013617033,0.00003777408,0.000013732053,0.000021278121,0.000001378041,0.00009079757,0.00001630423,0.00010793052,0.247075,0.75218314,0.00011578897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113902115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015178561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86282057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020841946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012587233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275982711","doi":"10.5840/philo20101324","title":"Conscientious Refusals without Conscience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Conscience; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07220251378484821,"score_gpt":0.28999797550399914,"score_spread":0.21779546171915093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275982711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4758943,0.00005592383,0.00005763168,0.005389916,0.0044570765,0.00018552992,0.00003594962,0.00019710316,0.51372653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843843,0.00000388762,0.00013005373,0.00066307496,0.0006990611,0.000008720331,0.000007315486,0.0000073495594,0.014096242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993107,0.000017574594,0.00013893875,0.00019370594,0.00017965701,0.00015946594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993941,0.00006097046,0.00006741237,0.00024953284,0.00016519359,0.00006276392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041142426,0.00007060795,0.00008278479,0.00005767849,0.0004875393,0.00021716919,0.00018087044,0.000038341776,0.0020214503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016879283,0.000059818045,0.000032374435,0.000027876342,0.0011173738,0.00018630092,0.00002227724,0.00022169988,0.0006976007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003214669,0.000036560603,0.00045274323,0.000009945818,0.0000035029584,7.656874e-7,0.012225299,2.7801488e-7,0.008913707,0.9723097,0.005154668,0.00088960776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018767602,0.000022796816,0.0004633381,0.000009909252,0.000015867348,0.0000058019514,0.0009743663,0.00009235646,0.0018929866,0.051321246,0.9448431,0.00017052625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011517295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017882233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93968844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056858808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051442203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503062492","doi":"10.5840/philo20141712","title":"‘O God, O Montreal!’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philo","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.015040293830465668,"score_gpt":0.2761652692316829,"score_spread":0.2611249754012172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503062492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002052194,0.00034551023,0.00006876544,0.010961895,0.00032774959,0.000046530386,7.3162437e-7,0.000082389975,0.98611426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821795,0.00002244382,0.000043350843,0.000370838,0.0006079769,0.000006755052,5.601409e-7,0.0000028800719,0.010727228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955237,0.00007047339,0.00004740675,0.000086136846,0.00012047852,0.00012316162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998198,0.000010629669,0.000019257554,0.00007373391,0.000028612825,0.000047948583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022119138,0.00004024836,0.000065839165,0.000009799982,0.00081403385,0.000012208129,0.0000924683,0.000026610802,0.00026277214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013577906,0.000033679495,0.000033181663,0.000064108826,0.000136642,0.00005896894,0.000012515446,0.000041115294,0.00031995113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008484067,0.000055638004,0.0010179849,0.0000070906676,0.00002329249,0.0000019281715,0.16584913,0.0000026971454,0.000085672415,0.6432629,0.14599277,0.043692384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005877744,0.00001013842,0.0007072846,0.0000026449015,0.00000518265,9.391494e-8,0.003080705,0.000001840012,0.000003563957,0.022707585,0.9733692,0.000052979147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025010548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035121418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98616576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023244684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011314531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62609726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}