{"meta":{"query_hash":"0d1bb9df7da9","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical Investigations"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0d1bb9df7da9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophical+Investigations"},"results":[{"id":"W1513468755","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2011.01462.x","title":"A Sort of Prologue: Philosophical Investigations §§1–7","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Mistake; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); sort; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Function (biology); Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Information retrieval; Cell biology","score_opus":0.1216483969227642,"score_gpt":0.2760850552216321,"score_spread":0.15443665829886793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513468755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33156863,0.0006141291,0.00024844863,0.37266484,0.0010464588,0.0016924003,0.0009672275,0.0007613245,0.29043654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893275,0.000010427596,0.0022370822,0.002958558,0.004373223,0.0004112495,0.00027557582,0.00005793522,0.00034845975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973917,0.00015762467,0.0009263405,0.00041420618,0.00050451356,0.00060561893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975705,0.00030636002,0.0003328848,0.00072467164,0.00033023456,0.0007353398],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037264536,0.00036792018,0.00045397953,0.00028503968,0.00078951544,0.00008486595,0.00047339653,0.00020598772,0.0011421005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004386971,0.00034533793,0.00025245585,0.00037010628,0.0032532646,0.000829165,0.00013696057,0.0005860176,0.0005873068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007874617,0.00050931255,0.001790586,0.000049469778,0.000074043084,7.770172e-7,0.0046565034,0.00001695723,0.0008748977,0.9902188,0.001724966,0.00007581403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032928796,0.000092325936,0.0009793127,0.000053276264,0.00014359436,0.000013613144,0.00013994596,0.00014502865,0.00097274524,0.9485999,0.04813934,0.0003916679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042224972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002151561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6577589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044704164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001493556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559106841","doi":"10.1111/phin.12050","title":"Wittgenstein and Friendship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Wonder; Rank (graph theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Everyday life; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.05741919124214178,"score_gpt":0.2298798394576989,"score_spread":0.17246064821555712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559106841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118668154,0.000089699206,0.0002735429,0.15928486,0.00021741149,0.00028008717,0.000058397378,0.00033669022,0.72079116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933925,0.0000037361663,0.000791823,0.003513449,0.0018216233,0.00007533199,0.000033232493,0.00002187505,0.000346387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990364,0.00006421339,0.0002512159,0.0002930975,0.00015637043,0.00019873191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00016324714,0.00006694017,0.00029789825,0.000081545775,0.00026047337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014421185,0.0001562124,0.00015633521,0.00008568741,0.00064207095,0.00016203096,0.0001451683,0.0000575759,0.00034594384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015288312,0.0001435038,0.00004976378,0.00007639094,0.0011483494,0.0002171837,0.000050364866,0.00020146192,0.00031509233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015220978,0.000032498432,0.00009164544,0.000010808576,0.000010550159,3.5976572e-7,0.0014306189,0.0000030364047,0.00017482677,0.99737704,0.00035507666,0.0005120401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015177646,0.000045538152,0.00021856453,0.0000144908,0.000023088256,0.000004114228,0.00005660897,0.0004410246,0.00009306448,0.8510642,0.14772382,0.00016367891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022227176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032234064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000091786815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018282932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5851915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607751726","doi":"10.1111/phin.12046","title":"<scp>W</scp>ittgenstein on Showing What Cannot Be Said","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Solipsism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mysticism; Key (lock); A priori and a posteriori; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10481882827458237,"score_gpt":0.25635193371758336,"score_spread":0.15153310544300097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607751726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18313041,0.00019834767,0.00012246553,0.2341887,0.0010970363,0.00070000824,0.0001765342,0.00065500336,0.57973146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97112536,0.000021508435,0.00036603794,0.020602448,0.0045796167,0.00021404446,0.0001805756,0.00006716315,0.002843248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776214,0.00015563489,0.0005298819,0.00059790566,0.00047038036,0.0004840304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975419,0.0008987752,0.0001627723,0.0007284819,0.00018952946,0.00047856104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002760322,0.00036897731,0.00033620774,0.00021697347,0.0012800967,0.00071534544,0.0004432515,0.00015097408,0.00027249797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065617176,0.0003493726,0.0001984114,0.00019885527,0.0010983706,0.00082690484,0.00008573886,0.0005514397,0.001021908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017027328,0.00013143754,0.000017480847,0.000018940309,0.000037053665,0.0000020479476,0.004500118,0.00009934853,0.0003310022,0.98568374,0.0087131355,0.00046398418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023347289,0.000114331844,0.000049976836,0.00009014292,0.000045428136,0.0000033382864,0.00052182283,0.00047259682,0.0005984681,0.5945105,0.40321106,0.00014885425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046607965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009428432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7879949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005719172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006949759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928179361","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2011.01440.x","title":"Morality and Religion: Some Questions about First Principles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conventionalism; Morality; Obligation; Epistemology; Internalism and externalism; Philosophy; Rationality; Moral obligation; Nihilism; Naturalism; Morality and religion; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.20702897837618375,"score_gpt":0.274629282201171,"score_spread":0.06760030382498725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928179361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14143911,0.0013607016,0.00005849308,0.38281783,0.0008394606,0.00060085027,0.00026729307,0.0007365234,0.47187972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285764,0.0002021006,0.00056215754,0.0047284043,0.0012850772,0.00008510826,0.000028894634,0.000028672957,0.000221936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855137,0.0001039281,0.0004366479,0.00038825744,0.00024135108,0.00027843492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869794,0.00021547252,0.000112568145,0.00039726205,0.0001681915,0.00040854892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034001953,0.00022629838,0.00023962655,0.00011442224,0.0010569703,0.00013229146,0.00023221465,0.00014940799,0.000543316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046200943,0.0002000656,0.00009587485,0.00007509912,0.0029248442,0.0004584194,0.00014764362,0.0005445258,0.00017416467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007665311,0.000121343626,0.00021822458,0.000037794995,0.000027635933,0.000005983024,0.004071313,0.0000040629757,0.0000075091966,0.9953792,0.0000936395,0.000025645633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016734932,0.000065772394,0.0018178435,0.00008055284,0.000046656747,0.0000061489495,0.000036826037,0.0002820674,0.000023472125,0.9552171,0.042001996,0.00025417475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004343301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036350128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85141855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002529921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064383916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026396197","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01381.x","title":"Wittgenstein's <i>Philosophical Grammar</i>: A Neglected Discussion of Vagueness","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Analogy; Epistemology; Grammar; Philosophy; Conflation; Coin flipping; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05316734534612932,"score_gpt":0.254901688067636,"score_spread":0.2017343427215067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026396197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10590669,0.00022283522,0.00052410335,0.7314724,0.00055601733,0.0013162943,0.0003849916,0.00080044667,0.15881626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300814,0.00001227791,0.0008949802,0.0032481814,0.0020940145,0.00008290584,0.00019756901,0.000039184866,0.00042275872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740916,0.00014162913,0.0008891002,0.0005720809,0.0005440953,0.00044390687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797267,0.00014557241,0.00030580795,0.00074430025,0.00038167747,0.00044999344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001277864,0.00039238235,0.00050987944,0.00026791156,0.0007336132,0.00012965768,0.00051827193,0.00019213541,0.0004419924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020892166,0.00028888808,0.00027583176,0.00044604472,0.0015107114,0.00044602025,0.00006927033,0.00050906587,0.00016327827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029598774,0.000451193,0.000037135727,0.000027313941,0.000037582828,0.0000052995506,0.00202829,0.00003942857,0.007719593,0.98795646,0.00068972266,0.0009783547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052372,0.00029596934,0.0006735191,0.00010928184,0.00010368887,0.000010973339,0.00008622145,0.00033222052,0.0014537002,0.9839536,0.01204358,0.00041353932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029344708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022565207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8871014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037926708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012197822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065027259","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2005.00254.x","title":"Going around the Vienna Circle: Wittgenstein and Verification","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reductionism; Meaning (existential); Norm (philosophy); Atomism","score_opus":0.06548883715306746,"score_gpt":0.24695136832206904,"score_spread":0.18146253116900157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065027259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2911177,0.00066835695,0.00021362469,0.5612379,0.00022363261,0.0007487005,0.00009354276,0.00032536636,0.1453712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99085927,0.00002724592,0.00050993374,0.0044889455,0.0033056657,0.00015516514,0.00004019608,0.000023963685,0.00058960024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884576,0.00006873659,0.000341505,0.0003211388,0.0002027868,0.00022006815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990043,0.00017749766,0.00011211962,0.00043202395,0.00010330272,0.00017073612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018990577,0.00016448008,0.00013861136,0.00006933075,0.0013345614,0.000293476,0.00023384321,0.00006094223,0.00017468058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009126944,0.00013484288,0.000060378246,0.0001245512,0.0014031735,0.0004148828,0.000054012635,0.00028562025,0.0004939977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023384066,0.000048018268,0.000044662327,0.000008732672,0.000018579169,3.1218732e-7,0.0034605896,0.000024643887,0.000544258,0.99283487,0.000632707,0.0023802628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019480288,0.000030773455,0.00070379477,0.000025952375,0.00005307081,0.000011176872,0.00023579164,0.0019258019,0.00018601469,0.71185267,0.28455907,0.0002210404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017521163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007300953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6997416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029985677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040488776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071806635","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2004.00212.x","title":"Wittgenstein's Diagnosis of Empiricism's Third Dogma: Why Perception is not an Amalgam of Sensation and Conceptualization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Empiricism; Perception; Citation; Epistemology; Amalgam (chemistry); Sensation; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Library science","score_opus":0.09870142926510783,"score_gpt":0.2815583551574269,"score_spread":0.18285692589231906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071806635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497965,0.00006335546,0.00051418034,0.0428342,0.00010149647,0.0005127884,0.0003377605,0.000098967874,0.0057407543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472,0.000051052764,0.0013543139,0.0030118402,0.00052411633,0.00010546072,0.00017525253,0.000026511207,0.000031475287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984121,0.00008553683,0.00064129796,0.00035781413,0.00033614255,0.00016715871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985908,0.000107187174,0.00033582712,0.00036135787,0.00042553077,0.00017924163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014459796,0.00020984218,0.0003059424,0.0001855979,0.00037274742,0.00006222732,0.00015121409,0.0001318091,0.00024057987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009900422,0.00020638776,0.00009308678,0.00019698769,0.0017394727,0.00058501126,0.00004162016,0.00016382367,0.00001974207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012774346,0.0002369809,0.0007785807,0.00006254988,0.000032527958,4.4012083e-7,0.030683294,0.00017716663,0.0045934105,0.962961,0.00020210445,0.00025912214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008644799,0.00039634656,0.004221287,0.00014495234,0.00017171314,0.000005130511,0.0016579438,0.00048108387,0.011608465,0.977566,0.002534385,0.00034820876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027234585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098338634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04492348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034863362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006984503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84162486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122401458","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2007.00305.x","title":"“Rethinking” the Preface of the <i>Tractatus</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Reading (process); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Framing (construction); Frame (networking); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Literature; Computer science; History; Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05578740136297844,"score_gpt":0.2237611524109453,"score_spread":0.16797375104796686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122401458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17410485,0.00018574018,0.000028959532,0.4594185,0.00039522146,0.0006517597,0.00020166572,0.00013432927,0.36487898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458176,0.0000020467103,0.00013464947,0.0025456364,0.0014298266,0.00007994081,0.000018857969,0.000016434235,0.0011908639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892664,0.00008575139,0.00035770817,0.00017814629,0.0002848797,0.0001668892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988594,0.00023860569,0.00018220748,0.0005353591,0.00013451079,0.000049912407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014150188,0.00013266504,0.00012303733,0.000029136148,0.0010207613,0.00009027382,0.0004938315,0.0000547031,0.0001856593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078354846,0.00007361826,0.00014491242,0.00015648747,0.002143265,0.0001397908,0.00007708764,0.00034035576,0.000063873274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012548911,0.00007168512,0.00012234175,0.000008660497,0.0000113050355,1.3232284e-7,0.0027596036,0.00008534324,0.00068110705,0.9923023,0.0039348546,0.000021423277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008567232,0.000011108483,0.0009830638,0.000022171,0.000041888907,0.0000020334382,0.000047374662,0.000077818346,0.0011630739,0.9146104,0.08286507,0.00009035753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018739614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021230945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8204769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013455196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006290458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78969496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560066032","doi":"10.1111/phin.12158","title":"LissaMcCullough, The Religious Philosophy of Simone Weil: An Introduction (New York/London: I.B. Tauris, 2014). vii + 264 pages, price £62.00 hb, £15,99 pb.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophy and Literary Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Theology; Philosophy; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05369547515342379,"score_gpt":0.23716710380913453,"score_spread":0.18347162865571073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560066032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02313272,0.0066645867,0.0008019715,0.92231894,0.001613512,0.0010729061,0.0006183608,0.000643893,0.043133087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973869,0.0007425312,0.00073825783,0.0037069633,0.018306304,0.000102960425,0.000275804,0.00008371217,0.0021744126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959565,0.0006547317,0.0011580681,0.0009232325,0.00075063907,0.0005568742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963399,0.00057269156,0.00059374067,0.0015107566,0.000390645,0.00059224886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006993934,0.0005573072,0.0006672779,0.00036380228,0.0010007886,0.00022553415,0.000935806,0.00027639137,0.002341636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055728207,0.00035673965,0.00043450764,0.0004964745,0.0024547756,0.0013307242,0.00015914111,0.0007079585,0.00038119726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007752878,0.00036018272,0.00007657162,0.000046005156,0.0002576577,0.0000063811,0.0045576543,0.0000384088,0.0025733986,0.8834527,0.108018585,0.0005349212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050810893,0.00026306915,0.000046562924,0.00007623928,0.00023109066,0.000010308919,0.00007698272,0.00009715592,0.0008532143,0.6861543,0.31128445,0.00039854582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020450293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090683956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95073634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088200366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019065982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792832214","doi":"10.1111/phin.12199","title":"Kantian Schemata: A Critique Consistent with the <i>Critique</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Generality; Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Schema (genetic algorithms); Bridging (networking); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07036387366470705,"score_gpt":0.2854273922296006,"score_spread":0.21506351856489359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792832214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019530907,0.00013781527,0.0002833311,0.68865454,0.00026746315,0.00036338362,0.00010643027,0.00024459566,0.29041153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95236677,0.000010919019,0.00030885453,0.04338256,0.00338224,0.000119339216,0.000028657145,0.00004102734,0.00035963955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983027,0.00019355405,0.00033272468,0.00039104387,0.0004069589,0.00037302342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795204,0.00047317875,0.000097890996,0.00055726874,0.0006207209,0.00029886953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004675252,0.00026095525,0.00024699658,0.00007594584,0.0015807461,0.00033071986,0.00041381884,0.00012129347,0.0008881374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034796578,0.00016132536,0.00011376907,0.00014357684,0.008846848,0.00028289613,0.000105702726,0.00076678797,0.00039839873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672812,0.0000894332,0.000009744134,0.000024260571,0.000056610963,0.00000934308,0.002918161,7.574545e-7,0.0001684879,0.9943235,0.0023522577,0.000030719042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023869827,0.00018869915,0.000015581374,0.00009721957,0.00006604567,0.000022789101,0.00029790716,0.00009842401,0.00041244912,0.892029,0.1062864,0.0002468157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010200513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007307974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022920847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016336654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793043356","doi":"10.1111/phin.12200","title":"Reading and Character: Weil and McDowell on Naïve Realism and Second Nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophy and Literary Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Dualism; Character (mathematics); Realism; Philosophy; Reading (process); Action (physics); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Physics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03338663021379922,"score_gpt":0.2470229145445178,"score_spread":0.21363628433071857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793043356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8142276,0.0003356751,0.0000013719026,0.06577887,0.00020400676,0.0001513257,0.00027537814,0.000089164205,0.11893665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866089,0.000057619003,0.00008678496,0.009524859,0.002650898,0.000013865827,0.00008503697,0.000016722279,0.00095526775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990041,0.00007094672,0.00022982716,0.00038268603,0.00013247893,0.00017994076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920666,0.00017165682,0.00007965282,0.00020264256,0.00008391488,0.0002554832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001426105,0.00019293885,0.00021943655,0.0001589696,0.00079380634,0.0002571622,0.000079326936,0.00014389091,0.00048741206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008628962,0.00016544719,0.00003420276,0.000066718436,0.0015207726,0.00044369022,0.000065835324,0.00045795026,0.000030159581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013474807,0.000026664771,0.00017877037,0.00002864057,0.00004944914,0.0000046669024,0.007054729,4.6541555e-8,0.00020701373,0.99153686,0.00066569867,0.00023398927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023715595,0.00015973311,0.0016135907,0.00007619996,0.00007408127,0.000015577394,0.000092233575,0.00025114222,0.00015138614,0.8786539,0.11844424,0.00023075273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025794627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005361464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17238139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008820127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012934257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67467403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793785950","doi":"10.1111/phin.12189","title":"Picturing Primates and Looking at Monkeys: Why 21st Century Primatology Needs Wittgenstein","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Primatology; Comparative psychology; Primate; Epistemology; Theory of mind; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Anthropocentrism; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Anthropology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03243069155546526,"score_gpt":0.2788900848843841,"score_spread":0.24645939332891884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793785950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979783,0.0005444887,0.00006713608,0.029865243,0.0004861655,0.0002449899,0.000009323852,0.0002577707,0.07054658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041736,0.00003500873,0.0021599287,0.0063506225,0.00070188445,0.000035518016,0.000035280147,0.000037312522,0.00022708076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.000110988476,0.0003669739,0.00045640377,0.00017519634,0.00041982214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906546,0.00015349826,0.00012222317,0.00029723736,0.000076248405,0.00028533378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012859548,0.00023315908,0.00026189565,0.00019693712,0.0005677884,0.00005190268,0.00017235028,0.00018607505,0.0004791802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001394119,0.00021956484,0.000053187032,0.00029418862,0.0009241578,0.00009278832,0.00022890205,0.00033185692,0.00051226665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038802616,0.00010799669,0.089162685,0.000043892767,0.00012122541,0.000016795144,0.0053148195,0.000002728461,0.0046312823,0.89805526,0.0015582812,0.00094623276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027805225,0.000770887,0.3851812,0.00044027745,0.00025271182,0.00067072635,0.0013554748,0.0003297244,0.0075524314,0.34726578,0.25156766,0.0018326135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016415146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007606879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006511914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036683457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89535946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894720801","doi":"10.1111/phin.12221","title":"ThomasMcNally, Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Language: The Legacy of the Philosophical Investigations (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017). xi + 209, price £75.00 hb","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Media studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Classics; Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04523802103837742,"score_gpt":0.2377320736312288,"score_spread":0.19249405259285138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894720801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21034804,0.00080523285,0.00007075239,0.41607177,0.00046953087,0.0021315187,0.0010671568,0.0001551183,0.36888087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99202114,0.000070390925,0.0002598809,0.0025207477,0.0026873497,0.00007193828,0.000055033266,0.00004740919,0.0022661232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661344,0.0006502174,0.0009318034,0.0006191004,0.0007394638,0.00044597618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956767,0.0009647343,0.0007724791,0.001579535,0.0007073186,0.00029921957],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006911384,0.00046720947,0.00057949603,0.00014656916,0.0023883728,0.00019636877,0.001488474,0.00020135503,0.00010263409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006405893,0.00028138357,0.00036589598,0.00062785443,0.020029876,0.000524913,0.00058380037,0.0008777573,0.000041036994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072836396,0.00015834694,0.00015182336,0.000067256144,0.00017812896,0.000002163123,0.0042395988,0.00001953679,0.0006578557,0.98861516,0.005815197,0.000022127833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002936487,0.00026853464,0.003480227,0.00036346164,0.00084530853,0.000058984224,0.00149893,0.0014589819,0.0030461815,0.92369425,0.06153589,0.0008127485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005086051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007732615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7816731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004761182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027851923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994860581","doi":"10.1111/phin.12268","title":"Elastic Worker: Time‐Sense, Energy and the Paradox of Resilience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Psychological resilience; Politics; Postmodernism; Resilience (materials science); Work (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.022898351821128576,"score_gpt":0.27580467854145624,"score_spread":0.25290632672032765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994860581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19353606,0.00053717865,0.00031893968,0.4100457,0.0003579116,0.00069841195,0.000044119184,0.00018133987,0.3942803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960948,0.000038236212,0.00036533046,0.0023016313,0.00039250057,0.00002838323,0.0000053129625,0.000013876488,0.0007598954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978597,0.00054425234,0.0003781004,0.0003072321,0.0005438474,0.00036686094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691355,0.002072219,0.00011974077,0.0003767834,0.00013751064,0.0003801869],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005910317,0.00014313629,0.00028578143,0.000084684594,0.00040657344,0.000052542055,0.00031232863,0.00013755106,0.00022925614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002323141,0.000107317086,0.000089902016,0.00056221656,0.0052518714,0.00019312155,0.000110657376,0.0002124227,0.00021409392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018594148,0.000029336667,0.0005221379,0.0000067352853,0.000014956793,0.0000011882386,0.00074829214,0.00005639569,0.00014677466,0.99807894,0.00029283325,0.00008378797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040714952,0.000034765097,0.0006001311,0.000046798465,0.000032169366,0.0000021568735,0.00006381564,0.0010564497,0.00008324967,0.99341446,0.004129173,0.00012966584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046301645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006336993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8025588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003436732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019058882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995093140","doi":"10.1111/phin.12267","title":"An Ethic of Refusal: Simone Weil and the Choice of the Lesser ‘Lesser Evil’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophy and Literary Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Simple (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0556169268509652,"score_gpt":0.2688580686107964,"score_spread":0.21324114175983122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995093140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87172544,0.00037210327,0.000003474061,0.101610124,0.0001553639,0.00029175074,0.00007833087,0.000029498899,0.025733894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643904,0.000020889105,0.00003264805,0.0026303842,0.00046240425,0.000020211375,0.000018288525,0.000015078645,0.00036105467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985676,0.00035903996,0.00043423616,0.00021978564,0.00028852376,0.00013085199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827415,0.0005812457,0.00023771693,0.00063584064,0.00018640708,0.00008463465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039910313,0.00014666375,0.00031955063,0.000069178655,0.00032028547,0.00005822867,0.00040985382,0.000082373954,0.0003795344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002104386,0.00008034073,0.0001565176,0.00017463684,0.0025160147,0.00036595995,0.000084709754,0.00039073938,0.000014051655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021474822,0.00008284692,0.0018859253,0.00006536321,0.00007827426,1.2366421e-7,0.006650929,0.00006933842,0.0006788135,0.99038976,0.00004915938,0.000027962938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059892435,0.00005581244,0.0028989373,0.000099001176,0.00019134473,7.1072566e-7,0.00025583772,0.0012211646,0.0005238584,0.9866192,0.007402937,0.00013232105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026699048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016683899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12471358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006066186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046766614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996606258","doi":"10.1111/phin.12263","title":"André Naud: From Vatican II to Simone Weil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophy and Literary Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Magisterium; Philosophy; Archbishop; Argument (complex analysis); Theme (computing); Theology","score_opus":0.04535434471165431,"score_gpt":0.2349800410767434,"score_spread":0.18962569636508908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996606258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6111209,0.00006303084,0.000039350994,0.13809007,0.00040621246,0.000307072,0.00043543597,0.00019530526,0.24934262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821833,0.000002960147,0.00057088945,0.0121074,0.0021713716,0.000048843904,0.00029477404,0.000026218282,0.0025942754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00007718448,0.00040984113,0.0004398213,0.00031608014,0.00027527355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986877,0.00019360175,0.00008367496,0.0005182293,0.000118803924,0.00039800504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010762404,0.00022646168,0.00032969384,0.00019003761,0.0006047559,0.00017221314,0.0003231042,0.00007410066,0.011764774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119234086,0.00020531814,0.00015580106,0.00021794118,0.0003270357,0.0004652405,0.00013939447,0.00028872272,0.002302534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012375758,0.00013003011,0.00042240747,0.000008347502,0.000098801676,0.000002941231,0.008003214,0.000080930404,0.00063222786,0.9892131,0.0012910932,0.000104545376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023166872,0.00012537903,0.00026311987,0.000036000365,0.00006900989,4.28474e-7,0.0001112925,0.0006484612,0.00017344387,0.7979172,0.2001497,0.00027433972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021815483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011423221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37106237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027986762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043959146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041386573","doi":"10.1111/phin.12287","title":"Peter Winch: “Unity: Presupposition or Demand?”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Winch; Presupposition; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.20586740214004492,"score_gpt":0.2881581260871868,"score_spread":0.0822907239471419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041386573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024928493,0.00008775769,0.00052363594,0.6990983,0.00037227458,0.00045285546,0.00025735667,0.00054956024,0.27372974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517719,0.0000124617545,0.0002744328,0.043887276,0.0036517023,0.000053455173,0.00011034194,0.00003614682,0.00020225173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983918,0.00018389271,0.0004012025,0.00038005452,0.00035843527,0.00028463235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998532,0.00034713326,0.00009561038,0.00025868716,0.00017800771,0.00058858725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020448824,0.00022999618,0.00025430572,0.000070811766,0.00066394353,0.00022769402,0.0003028334,0.00013495793,0.0037110767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007605925,0.00018059667,0.00013324061,0.00012812602,0.0012124529,0.00039359397,0.000121623336,0.0007026677,0.0007989785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052501327,0.00007877694,0.000014332949,0.000049517446,0.00004219968,0.00001654155,0.005163688,0.000020634561,0.0002888186,0.9934015,0.0008052,0.00006626539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033681656,0.00021809782,0.000040967447,0.00003923736,0.000064487715,0.0000049410096,0.00006359138,0.0012914467,0.00016794,0.9428748,0.05463593,0.00026178334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017185233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033561377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92684346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021319862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010515231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087513168","doi":"10.1111/phin.12289","title":"Wittgenstein on Aspect‐Recognition in Philosophy and Mathematics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Epistemology; Philosophy of mathematics; Philosophy; Grammar; Linguistics; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.15997908434372576,"score_gpt":0.24912148403759468,"score_spread":0.08914239969386892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087513168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21506181,0.00009654191,0.000045216864,0.44681233,0.00010905916,0.0007886173,0.00025576758,0.00031394718,0.3365167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868526,0.000013671814,0.0010621593,0.010172915,0.0016211247,0.0001251307,0.00007723275,0.000035624907,0.00003954566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986316,0.00005172771,0.00044394116,0.00041528372,0.00023341001,0.00022402193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910736,0.00017389859,0.00010640929,0.00021523699,0.00007161052,0.0003255014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009004438,0.000236251,0.00026044322,0.00013849836,0.00031096296,0.00013121353,0.00016251039,0.00008442904,0.0003888291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018645881,0.0002287654,0.00006674847,0.00019749397,0.00070189696,0.0002484376,0.00005137005,0.00039882562,0.0007086612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009722135,0.00015991903,0.000041507952,0.000054996264,0.000014996208,0.0000062132804,0.0072609223,0.000014438352,0.00022296398,0.9916267,0.00030539223,0.00028223102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043981054,0.00017481031,0.000091568225,0.00009617132,0.000026880116,0.000003565586,0.00024553068,0.0010405529,0.00020396881,0.99274296,0.0046511344,0.00028303952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013816806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025585063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7717908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023514913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031468844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93287826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137269293","doi":"10.1111/phin.12309","title":"‘The bang was not as loud as I had expected’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Biotech (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Epistemology; Semantic theory of truth; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Philosophy of language; Natural (archaeology); Linguistics; Metaphysics; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.09551214641926718,"score_gpt":0.30317291793655377,"score_spread":0.20766077151728657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137269293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04912468,0.00071295275,0.000016007873,0.2757865,0.0008109993,0.00011614112,0.00005794349,0.00013676594,0.67323804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97427404,0.000050783725,0.00011532685,0.0061936625,0.0049138516,0.000039821334,0.00010859669,0.00002380136,0.014280128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866986,0.000081457096,0.00033910509,0.00028973984,0.0003591494,0.00026070655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845225,0.00033557718,0.00008536635,0.00043023922,0.00045265685,0.00024392352],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012706916,0.00015822894,0.00018103218,0.00005387786,0.0015134696,0.00058896065,0.0002163213,0.000058282953,0.0034020273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017851309,0.00011927071,0.00017990204,0.00012124691,0.00081073074,0.00009723478,0.000091296046,0.00026229545,0.0013551998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027077585,0.000060243598,0.000038297487,0.000004624286,0.000085571024,0.0000366246,0.0017090432,0.000019096231,0.0000925434,0.99411076,0.0037625064,0.00007800617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095579475,0.000018825447,0.000028046463,0.000016460353,0.00010801207,0.0000050536955,0.0007302195,0.00031507536,0.0004605298,0.710775,0.2873036,0.00014360202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037270974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009429231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026792663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023157349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253941914","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9205.2006.00304.x","title":"Index for 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performance studies; Library science; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12113738370492089,"score_gpt":0.28897972467894006,"score_spread":0.16784234097401918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253941914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05631695,0.000515996,0.004984099,0.3014151,0.00244948,0.0012295507,0.00082471006,0.0006420294,0.6316221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845705,0.0000020205612,0.00090444076,0.0034626173,0.004844658,0.00013656524,0.0001851942,0.000024962454,0.0058690542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999112,0.0000417792,0.000280599,0.00021004296,0.00013553281,0.00022006461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991623,0.00026434506,0.00008176344,0.00019579488,0.00020692845,0.000088850335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016070287,0.00012858275,0.00016779969,0.0000707198,0.0005140779,0.000088143985,0.00013417787,0.00009595459,0.0001532919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014503517,0.00011930503,0.000119987206,0.00004487059,0.0011622831,0.00015417166,0.000020487012,0.00021832176,0.000098467164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003797667,0.00007047972,0.00030130032,0.00002440246,0.000013420311,5.105578e-7,0.0005730352,0.00003990697,0.00006271234,0.98579186,0.013077111,0.00004147747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018912755,0.000038012207,0.00021189277,0.000009471557,0.000028223114,7.2093184e-7,0.000043567903,0.00030447185,0.000072732415,0.7845196,0.21445924,0.00012295529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028649135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92825353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001772016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005854206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48651177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302773988","doi":"10.1111/phin.12373","title":"Understanding Wittgenstein's positive philosophy through <scp>language‐games: Giving philosophy peace</scp>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Philips (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Vocabulary; Philosophy of language; Philosophical theory; Linguistics; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.1596420412056361,"score_gpt":0.2679434981953327,"score_spread":0.10830145698969659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302773988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04804536,0.0012301569,0.0012103149,0.11700281,0.0013161441,0.0019572284,0.00269298,0.001316841,0.82522815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822085,0.000026099335,0.00083213806,0.008618941,0.0050075897,0.00081435783,0.00065158156,0.00017571833,0.0016650686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950977,0.0005579794,0.0010091417,0.0012120039,0.0011943099,0.00092888455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967667,0.00091599685,0.0005278027,0.0010481934,0.00021362185,0.0005276804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051099557,0.000742007,0.0006626151,0.0004515902,0.005634651,0.00045044324,0.0010062512,0.0001593316,0.0013757724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000318079,0.0008067088,0.00047218727,0.00077342836,0.0023164346,0.0010810604,0.00060554675,0.0015709305,0.0003892662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008182235,0.00038066375,0.000040971474,0.00006695648,0.00019670825,0.00004693127,0.046388317,0.000383735,0.00062686525,0.9463627,0.0054671597,0.000030833373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007445808,0.0003161083,0.00004618416,0.00010586125,0.00016199693,0.000061421844,0.009379182,0.00039760696,0.00024359951,0.93937486,0.04871366,0.00045493594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093201445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002816216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93416315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005502257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022051303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390588012","doi":"10.1111/phin.12414","title":"Hadot's later Wittgenstein: A critique","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Historiography; Criticism; Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Analogy; Language-game; Focus (optics); Literature; Linguistics; History; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.0675456448795538,"score_gpt":0.27798625866583876,"score_spread":0.21044061378628495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390588012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019756574,0.0008940044,0.00025483343,0.4791156,0.0010277118,0.00052313023,0.00033184324,0.0014220154,0.49667427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864565,0.000014425255,0.00049602985,0.004919453,0.0039883777,0.00024191062,0.000102575774,0.000053242726,0.0037274752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985908,0.000055061784,0.00037868432,0.00044524306,0.00023628885,0.0002938944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904525,0.00016787504,0.000033209013,0.0003720372,0.000120744895,0.00026088287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012752003,0.00023321628,0.00018559548,0.00018420238,0.00056664087,0.0006212394,0.00023671295,0.000096715194,0.0020896175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006065799,0.00020595892,0.00016244588,0.00018409448,0.0010114936,0.0005196694,0.00005454914,0.00042474372,0.0027696635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018786382,0.00005070629,0.000008323118,0.00005740374,0.000045598805,0.000019020423,0.003289364,0.000006785462,0.00042882765,0.985573,0.01023041,0.000288718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006029302,0.000029557914,0.000015470745,0.00007940111,0.000040833267,0.000013198261,0.000054565528,0.00058376254,0.0002358364,0.6744079,0.3242843,0.0001949026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003060735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043878215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96669996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003352742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009491851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399506149","doi":"10.1111/phin.12425","title":"The strange thing of which we find ourselves a part: Theodore Dreiser's virus novel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adventure; Tragedy (event); EPIC; Literature; Population; History; Poetry; Malaise; Reputation; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Art history; Sociology; Art; Biology; Social science; Demography","score_opus":0.07375471502299233,"score_gpt":0.3318080894312675,"score_spread":0.25805337440827514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399506149","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036128562,0.0065584513,0.0005202264,0.906745,0.001275721,0.00043005001,0.00018540534,0.0002446077,0.04791198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576396,0.00064448453,0.0004071101,0.00067725225,0.0014332858,0.00004179458,0.000022708913,0.000014435464,0.000994954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984149,0.0001917897,0.00031896177,0.00024958406,0.00054172165,0.00028309342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981143,0.0011272818,0.00007170584,0.00025894545,0.00018699311,0.00024078401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094132614,0.00012492838,0.00017225192,0.00009321595,0.00081448123,0.00028072667,0.00035389798,0.0001734621,0.00010914468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013421446,0.00008435627,0.00015093895,0.0011719124,0.00089918834,0.00028680015,0.000036344754,0.00047821214,0.000036793615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019656752,0.000032831354,0.00008010087,0.000023649456,0.0000926856,0.0000020795483,0.021409683,0.00002133958,0.001251148,0.9751776,0.00138514,0.00052181527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007759183,0.00001909229,0.00015935814,0.0002239196,0.00018495411,0.0000010665491,0.0015028741,0.0007406426,0.00035392915,0.8256061,0.17099418,0.00013630002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000319925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021315173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95963544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032096043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048296025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62644136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413831359","doi":"10.1111/phin.70009","title":"Aspect perception and rule‐following in Wittgenstein's <i>Philosophical Investigations</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Investigations","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Durham College","funders":"","keywords":"Platonism; Perception; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mode (computer interface); Infinity; Projective test; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.046410896829739826,"score_gpt":0.2643545625073346,"score_spread":0.21794366567759477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413831359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5179235,0.00031823796,0.00009741298,0.3119191,0.00047162108,0.00085736095,0.00008991946,0.00037160653,0.16795126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888805,0.000031206626,0.0014194928,0.007425283,0.0010344133,0.00035052627,0.00013868992,0.00004116759,0.0006786999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736214,0.00018888639,0.0008523549,0.0007772358,0.00036070833,0.00045867066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985007,0.0003293412,0.00013838329,0.0005550815,0.00013911446,0.0003373834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035481065,0.00041261673,0.00046606347,0.0006323197,0.0010687899,0.00035218502,0.00034595406,0.0002318853,0.00020301988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003714907,0.00042343742,0.0001927559,0.0006406401,0.0017672996,0.0006568436,0.00015809752,0.0007603877,0.00017117187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009071491,0.00016047235,0.0021685255,0.000048708254,0.000051733095,0.000009075793,0.0024264632,0.00003096101,0.0013767419,0.9926808,0.0006728478,0.0003645872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070175406,0.00004688297,0.004487616,0.00023415178,0.0001074407,0.0000064119417,0.00037101132,0.00069004286,0.00010252485,0.9820005,0.010831585,0.00042005655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001346135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028472894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47095704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012372987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018637834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}