{"meta":{"query_hash":"936822914aff","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical Issues"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/936822914aff","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophical+Issues"},"results":[{"id":"W4308450111","doi":"10.1111/phis.12225","title":"On the independence of belief and credence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Independence (probability theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10426348735065323,"score_gpt":0.29417144826884245,"score_spread":0.18990796091818923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308450111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17406069,0.0030560172,0.23097341,0.038256753,0.00051100843,0.0000846499,0.00036790533,0.00015741405,0.5525322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902845,0.00033345463,0.0045761797,0.0008081074,0.0002909109,0.00004445286,0.00007942798,0.000030773746,0.003552295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888538,0.0052063297,0.00048993673,0.0014300125,0.0031650753,0.0008548932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645891,0.025853701,0.001750229,0.0033067842,0.0033063681,0.001193811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008905704,0.00039402887,0.001029038,0.0025887054,0.0028947846,0.006143921,0.0013374627,0.0023572408,0.007414894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026400646,0.0006268265,0.001058687,0.0012564235,0.03294139,0.010450183,0.008619402,0.007954921,0.0006822018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130776,0.000009758467,0.00020386094,0.0000151838285,0.0000074352074,0.000025668929,0.0004396081,0.0001278583,0.000050214152,0.99751425,0.00023384189,0.0013591838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006448467,0.00000495772,0.00026856715,0.000014441243,0.0000059726963,0.000030497215,0.00012326402,0.000599344,0.00007638135,0.99729973,0.0015649771,0.0000053298145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023309793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008934052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008905704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032381231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016059467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047098458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402735461","doi":"10.1111/phis.12270","title":"The relational foundations of epistemic normativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13942213779372395,"score_gpt":0.34003044071721017,"score_spread":0.20060830292348622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402735461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085425735,0.0024554143,0.33745646,0.038917266,0.000506849,0.00011194366,0.00019322825,0.00023479047,0.5346983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98265,0.00037236424,0.012273357,0.0008318095,0.00018498242,0.00008853658,0.00004519368,0.00004463117,0.0035090945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97825706,0.014188045,0.0009823288,0.0026153699,0.0029919774,0.00096519926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714732,0.017036362,0.0028410403,0.004163826,0.0036253657,0.00086016825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564555,0.0003970045,0.00068492646,0.0017053775,0.0041632266,0.010521275,0.0012621502,0.0030510386,0.0051962016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027184399,0.00047778987,0.00072953425,0.0016824444,0.035572466,0.01345625,0.0057717357,0.0038430698,0.00078913325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031797524,0.0000031456998,0.00009287319,0.0000081988555,0.0000033992242,0.000015439133,0.0007366923,0.00012507946,0.000038976443,0.9981664,0.00015812097,0.0006486297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005991079,0.000003393839,0.00010224486,0.000022508462,0.0000034266084,0.000017478395,0.000505895,0.000537425,0.00006955718,0.9940355,0.004690849,0.0000057194757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035213667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016051412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004109342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024658157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128691424","doi":"10.1111/phis.70007","title":"Rational Feelings for Virtual Things?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Realism; Metaphysics; Feeling; Leverage (statistics); Rational agent","score_opus":0.03614229994361446,"score_gpt":0.3751411144698334,"score_spread":0.33899881452621894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128691424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21384571,0.002449888,0.05887155,0.050136495,0.0013815466,0.00010321203,0.00008617719,0.00017426709,0.67295104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206805,0.00028885403,0.00201047,0.0015784475,0.00011415245,0.000019843,0.00001735865,0.000029479663,0.0038734088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994146,0.003628017,0.00015261336,0.0005621176,0.0010797367,0.00043143754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992073,0.0044853324,0.0011973344,0.00079332106,0.0010076961,0.000443347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006425496,0.000572312,0.00039831083,0.0007428883,0.002065531,0.0063888985,0.0007889745,0.003215095,0.01298914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019347437,0.00033767478,0.00062403263,0.00028649933,0.018929439,0.0059301443,0.0025590847,0.003477831,0.0013286467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073160605,0.00004006883,0.0010355216,0.000110975954,0.000036326885,0.00021492045,0.009625359,0.0006682002,0.0011013813,0.9770796,0.0037638256,0.006250717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052576248,0.000063454085,0.002454749,0.00019237187,0.00003947521,0.00033514915,0.014900775,0.0027219488,0.00069732766,0.93545413,0.043012593,0.00007554096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005856616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003674431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01298914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017424512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004934925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043452978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129048751","doi":"10.1111/phis.70014","title":"Pluralist Pragmatism and Rationality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Pluralism (philosophy); Great Rationality Debate","score_opus":0.06784665982479686,"score_gpt":0.3316994581708203,"score_spread":0.26385279834602343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129048751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0499069,0.010492218,0.08272435,0.26266742,0.0010942363,0.00006689783,0.000083534054,0.00019984599,0.5927646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677358,0.0012351497,0.008966491,0.0061917864,0.0005027328,0.00007471872,0.000021006377,0.00006389769,0.015208482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794277,0.013533383,0.0006307418,0.0020272166,0.0034751152,0.0009058137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921264,0.012761617,0.0017209372,0.0028429783,0.0028078756,0.00065396697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016714035,0.00053053023,0.0008356574,0.0016127634,0.0049644965,0.008818459,0.001657987,0.0043057473,0.0037432737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017954292,0.0004247951,0.00090042735,0.0011703065,0.04873715,0.008176823,0.006514471,0.007231572,0.00069133425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003899194,0.0000039513393,0.000027920752,0.000011264394,0.0000034040202,0.000015623633,0.0007287986,0.00020267123,0.00003130458,0.9975273,0.00093528786,0.0005086762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005667438,0.0000023651862,0.000027159089,0.000029829649,0.0000020023917,0.00001311164,0.00026681798,0.0004083999,0.00004964437,0.9914055,0.0077853072,0.00000419734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037093528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022600936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016714035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009768209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051721237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08839333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}