{"meta":{"query_hash":"936822914aff","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical Issues"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/936822914aff","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophical+Issues"},"results":[{"id":"W4308450111","doi":"10.1111/phis.12225","title":"On the independence of belief and credence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Normative; Independence (probability theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10426348735065323,"score_gpt":0.29417144826884245,"score_spread":0.18990796091818923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308450111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66572905,0.003245297,0.0000070387796,0.17851906,0.00082315004,0.00033843712,0.00011920753,0.00007975391,0.151139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603796,0.00006256876,0.000011069005,0.0020542855,0.00039960496,0.00002380371,0.000002850994,0.000008438254,0.0013994277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990554,0.00016595497,0.00015630374,0.00016661714,0.00033815423,0.00011756628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991341,0.00048664576,0.00007257988,0.00021093662,0.000063663,0.00003204292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044216725,0.00008758889,0.00015979508,0.00003077283,0.00050520233,0.000028830922,0.00023495522,0.000030155907,0.001397691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014238682,0.000060016766,0.000046181874,0.000027465145,0.00083338056,0.00005153823,0.00015719779,0.00047991073,0.000015644695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018901195,0.00007472456,0.00004495902,0.000016458327,0.000015420404,0.0000034596703,0.012406828,0.0000043338373,0.00006123892,0.98664975,0.0005497877,0.0001541392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007834105,0.00027365013,0.000076807424,0.000012971206,0.000013545482,0.0000022941879,0.001504637,0.000025818663,0.00018064646,0.94996125,0.047789346,0.00008072561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016738893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003492202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3303089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007685881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015324058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402735461","doi":"10.1111/phis.12270","title":"The relational foundations of epistemic normativity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13942213779372395,"score_gpt":0.34003044071721017,"score_spread":0.20060830292348622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402735461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03183193,0.011593886,0.0004488986,0.5643533,0.0036811193,0.00034331813,0.00019363867,0.00031653975,0.38723737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254405,0.0001663684,0.00006630955,0.00014338164,0.0016821952,0.00001405797,0.000028192444,0.000011126953,0.0053443057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916124,0.00010726732,0.000275233,0.00013030965,0.00020514977,0.000120806515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860376,0.0009964348,0.000054018656,0.00017881875,0.00013511544,0.000031839176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000430444,0.00008937691,0.00014095278,0.000038241426,0.00041319974,0.00011291876,0.00013152717,0.000053041324,0.0003018729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015490582,0.000058145462,0.00011359303,0.0000417495,0.0010613683,0.00020304778,0.00003660362,0.00029685049,0.00024830404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004638596,0.000025721063,0.000026956162,0.00006847326,0.00004972569,0.0000012345142,0.007149128,0.0000025892853,0.000031199266,0.99103385,0.0008935892,0.0007128942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028909188,0.000022197411,0.00006460558,0.00003713048,0.00002132236,0.0000012660015,0.00016728466,0.00022700655,0.000032896638,0.69074565,0.30860028,0.000051440926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007078338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014691136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96071213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015996444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041603886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39106557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128691424","doi":"10.1111/phis.70007","title":"Rational Feelings for Virtual Things?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Realism; Metaphysics; Feeling; Leverage (statistics); Rational agent","score_opus":0.03614229994361446,"score_gpt":0.3751411144698334,"score_spread":0.33899881452621894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128691424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013857768,0.0009059335,0.022062002,0.36769342,0.002344839,0.0005832054,0.000051681272,0.0002992866,0.5922018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846257,0.00000560902,0.00082477886,0.0072424435,0.0009139458,0.00010486727,0.000016831125,0.000009930693,0.002419026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986936,0.00006875629,0.00026656056,0.00044322902,0.00020448942,0.00032340162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989445,0.000539537,0.00004211211,0.00026619874,0.00009752286,0.00011013496],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041207735,0.00014860995,0.00020889475,0.000082580766,0.00021989559,0.000050455372,0.0003951435,0.00016215285,0.00094305386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045301934,0.00012554557,0.00012069204,0.00026143645,0.00042397622,0.00014922691,0.00007872217,0.00020757728,0.00031608532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001612122,0.00015032153,0.000034735524,0.000006963159,0.000034172153,0.0000032539542,0.0003135887,0.0000026613336,0.00034190543,0.99509907,0.0016812031,0.0021709285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045889724,0.00014651817,0.0003419384,0.000021934473,0.000020558147,0.0000018619845,0.000032643646,0.00027285772,0.00046465851,0.9658198,0.03228021,0.00013813918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011209813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.3953625e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002185586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002587318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129048751","doi":"10.1111/phis.70014","title":"Pluralist Pragmatism and Rationality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Issues","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rationality; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Pluralism (philosophy); Great Rationality Debate","score_opus":0.06784665982479686,"score_gpt":0.3316994581708203,"score_spread":0.26385279834602343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129048751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03657653,0.0055372138,0.00009219786,0.44037738,0.0011661812,0.00028676697,0.00007433051,0.00019907401,0.5156903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489153,0.00012773446,0.00013200301,0.0035693252,0.0009063431,0.00001577432,0.000028965793,0.000006693883,0.0103216395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927574,0.00009032921,0.00019875285,0.00019453418,0.00011781635,0.00012280801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945354,0.00019123132,0.000041879106,0.00015569825,0.00011470339,0.00004292358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021578737,0.000107538486,0.00019901895,0.000040810297,0.00028614042,0.000114956245,0.00009194288,0.000068379326,0.00032496935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013598238,0.00009014633,0.000046619247,0.000023988672,0.00076986995,0.0001401231,0.00005308683,0.0001993051,0.000040698767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073511983,0.00004194594,0.00018828368,0.00007266734,0.000033147346,0.0000018422471,0.003671233,2.2692117e-7,0.000020776659,0.99368227,0.0018598195,0.0004204209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011343993,0.00001514103,0.00048786905,0.000025322222,0.000020268277,4.618195e-7,0.0001394756,0.000023569495,0.000042788226,0.6965993,0.30246127,0.00007111662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026602246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021846736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94831496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009711147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020786345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36760604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}