{"meta":{"query_hash":"f47ced49f3ab","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical inquiries"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f47ced49f3ab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophical+inquiries"},"results":[{"id":"W1598397404","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v3i1.119","title":"Assessing metaphor as mediator between Christianity and science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Christianity; Sociology; Analogy; Ideology; Mediation; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Theology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.298164757527164,"score_gpt":0.38820872098936976,"score_spread":0.09004396346220578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598397404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71974415,0.006604774,0.045000892,0.022435436,0.0006080945,0.0002321754,0.00015222398,0.000106902015,0.2051154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910816,0.0006365363,0.007033851,0.00033185436,0.000033037195,0.0000750248,0.000027662401,0.000018463143,0.0007618855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862894,0.01036267,0.00050916587,0.0006156139,0.0017793097,0.00044385914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387377,0.05111948,0.0040183994,0.0023156654,0.0029743204,0.0008343756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016138654,0.00047125813,0.000744408,0.0033871874,0.0037292303,0.005800186,0.0011399188,0.0016730999,0.008603057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062950045,0.00036422635,0.00055002543,0.0021860101,0.014225535,0.010613403,0.0099867,0.0029502697,0.00035446914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015021197,0.00013190042,0.023439972,0.0009535469,0.0000783576,0.00067360443,0.17565063,0.00038746904,0.0013703989,0.7647607,0.0014760044,0.030927245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077988334,0.00026684057,0.05005838,0.0015413259,0.0002094653,0.0013253181,0.24947785,0.0034185895,0.0026159892,0.6335548,0.057299025,0.00015445033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001272987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011678549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016138654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023504805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026916848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085350394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754415601","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v5i2.192","title":"James on religious experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Religious experience; Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12852450407421165,"score_gpt":0.3344982180124536,"score_spread":0.20597371393824196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754415601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13085671,0.013032912,0.007103856,0.058436915,0.001132771,0.000020023821,0.00003575673,0.000024046718,0.789357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97310364,0.0018804712,0.00045040518,0.0032384314,0.00030101114,0.0000073861934,0.000007484285,0.000011495692,0.020999681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854434,0.00087551767,0.000030775027,0.000115079565,0.00027996852,0.00015432957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987606,0.00077720726,0.00009314123,0.00010480233,0.00012676175,0.00013747421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014815878,0.00015467101,0.00018318606,0.0005245286,0.0034591572,0.0031813479,0.00032728398,0.0014869714,0.004020553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033323553,0.00010167878,0.00013237656,0.00047888712,0.01607631,0.0039709965,0.0030042757,0.0027591966,0.00033261918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007189502,0.0000066593047,0.00022886516,0.00001672574,0.0000011515122,0.00005018313,0.019325173,0.00004059348,0.00007864353,0.9742275,0.0022859827,0.0037314426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013621628,0.000040771127,0.0012432506,0.00014580942,0.000006341312,0.00022329923,0.020395102,0.00019267102,0.00018953475,0.67136055,0.30616882,0.0000202349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004105513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038225385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004105513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001603338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009085494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0134500265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897401158","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v6i1.218","title":"Was Royaumont merely a dialogue de sourds? An Introduction to the discussion générale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06715421566981535,"score_gpt":0.3095230908987937,"score_spread":0.24236887522897838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897401158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090856915,0.072909325,0.053645518,0.2969864,0.016357712,0.00026587897,0.0005798161,0.00031240273,0.54985726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36257404,0.056306295,0.029841555,0.07264282,0.023126576,0.0011032983,0.0006347145,0.0014495224,0.45232126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471587,0.0036806064,0.00012444159,0.00051771756,0.0005041193,0.00045737028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469006,0.0042983573,0.000143199,0.00018933119,0.0005035056,0.00017554448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007016435,0.0010921437,0.0010378512,0.00228987,0.009575159,0.011099689,0.0022990087,0.0073783207,0.023315817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114903385,0.00061598036,0.0013068999,0.002605515,0.013700447,0.013110878,0.0045933947,0.011220221,0.003914316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021031845,0.000012257265,0.00009848421,0.000088931076,0.0000043499954,0.000120946264,0.007292282,0.000072626295,0.00015169638,0.9583775,0.028152594,0.005607334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006786321,0.000017197915,0.00052009244,0.000399744,0.000007136993,0.0002211039,0.007892903,0.00038427315,0.0002668831,0.094364874,0.8958822,0.000036848433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025418855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01733974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025418855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008755488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031825805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015158120","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v8i1.281","title":"Potentiality, modality, and time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Appeal; Ontology; Modal; Philosophy of mind; Framing (construction); Incompatibilism; Computer science; Moral responsibility; Compatibilism; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.07937587695016678,"score_gpt":0.32656201077654456,"score_spread":0.24718613382637777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015158120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052012153,0.012841692,0.15090598,0.08488314,0.0009546073,0.00005526943,0.00013518192,0.00016735171,0.6980445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564334,0.0027024036,0.01414891,0.0037349383,0.0005361368,0.00010010991,0.000045540168,0.00008137202,0.02221715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854314,0.00088004913,0.000041516123,0.0002048584,0.00020336229,0.00012707834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817896,0.0012994792,0.00013653938,0.00016419278,0.00012255558,0.00009835435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017510051,0.00040370316,0.00045060716,0.0011116088,0.0025428666,0.004923774,0.00096640846,0.0021277526,0.007927832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028375902,0.00030703738,0.00065252447,0.0009959063,0.014185036,0.009807316,0.003369401,0.0040117675,0.0010836703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003942654,0.000002813236,0.000033638815,0.00000803488,0.0000010106094,0.000008718153,0.00024097583,0.000048188176,0.00004060023,0.99794084,0.00057273667,0.001098471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004393157,0.000008507679,0.000058319412,0.000020008316,0.0000017841705,0.000036837268,0.0002081527,0.00026309356,0.00010748926,0.98370636,0.01557999,0.0000050104773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066488504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076845696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007927832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022018703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069617026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026521266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135268784","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v9i1.342","title":"Naturalism, pragmatism and historical epistemology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Empiricism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Social epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Continental philosophy; Hacker; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.10408860685554613,"score_gpt":0.25658642916354485,"score_spread":0.15249782230799871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135268784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052655607,0.053710353,0.12280299,0.11431632,0.0016475851,0.00008762584,0.00015634335,0.00014091871,0.6544823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95203567,0.009249334,0.015488168,0.0045541865,0.0013533223,0.00016201047,0.000076307224,0.00007434271,0.017006695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370193,0.00473193,0.0001734371,0.0005596083,0.00059161,0.00024158527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935765,0.0076551684,0.0006756567,0.0012446521,0.00065345655,0.00041337495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075257984,0.00039242598,0.00055471115,0.0025805384,0.0050258692,0.008931321,0.0015139198,0.0024330704,0.0034380597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009100294,0.00033753618,0.00037464756,0.0020924062,0.061276115,0.012631346,0.004147449,0.004930463,0.00046639238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001515124,0.0000041598873,0.000042741583,0.00001815769,0.0000015448893,0.000010292326,0.0010858506,0.00006207558,0.000010159308,0.99742633,0.00029096252,0.0010461324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031256745,0.0000036939969,0.00005082204,0.000050901544,9.583705e-7,0.000020711575,0.00072887965,0.00014653263,0.00002658874,0.98106706,0.017898114,0.000002594693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016359043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99497414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005663975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035950236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041095197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}