{"meta":{"query_hash":"f47ced49f3ab","filters":{"venue":"Philosophical inquiries"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f47ced49f3ab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophical+inquiries"},"results":[{"id":"W1598397404","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v3i1.119","title":"Assessing metaphor as mediator between Christianity and science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Christianity; Sociology; Analogy; Ideology; Mediation; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Theology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.298164757527164,"score_gpt":0.38820872098936976,"score_spread":0.09004396346220578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598397404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378369,0.0004599101,0.00009952501,0.02749469,0.0012320179,0.00009422276,0.0000066594703,0.00009951748,0.032676566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973635,0.000007615297,0.00017320075,0.000507488,0.0017458508,0.0000074200484,0.0000046933715,0.0000063854895,0.00018381739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874175,0.000049182392,0.00018994029,0.00027060555,0.00051357865,0.00023493002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899554,0.00010190238,0.00006749171,0.00015567368,0.0003148403,0.00036453546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009664589,0.00010680303,0.00015263287,0.00014022498,0.00073311274,0.0009052122,0.00021918301,0.000035116886,0.00020020046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011388487,0.00008458584,0.000023789395,0.0001404098,0.009675184,0.0016554596,0.00009858359,0.00014985698,0.00015157583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033388224,0.000029311805,0.0024189928,0.0000065395525,0.000004691673,9.2146234e-7,0.01629098,1.9106214e-7,0.00006446693,0.97896403,0.0016056183,0.0006109052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023760363,0.00012438015,0.0066465316,0.00001988451,0.000035611352,0.000006099079,0.013607178,0.00009944502,0.00043348735,0.91864526,0.059856907,0.00028759096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005955656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001791475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060318764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005662433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003730167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99301994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754415601","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v5i2.192","title":"James on religious experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Religious experience; Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12852450407421165,"score_gpt":0.3344982180124536,"score_spread":0.20597371393824196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754415601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39450285,0.00031021563,0.000039830622,0.18682855,0.0047820765,0.00023849573,0.000031527587,0.00028379212,0.41298267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192655,0.00006633285,0.00003839507,0.0026045723,0.0047278767,0.000068596055,0.000006395497,0.000020750964,0.0005405426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.000031931264,0.00023268576,0.00030331066,0.0002663745,0.00025892124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869907,0.00010257558,0.00016554202,0.0008396002,0.000085109896,0.00010808991],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107193446,0.00018859164,0.00019151541,0.00006135864,0.0018641092,0.0007323304,0.0005958058,0.000069146554,0.00065880595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041105665,0.00015654508,0.000083010775,0.0000114556715,0.0041948454,0.0006448001,0.000111842375,0.00022396276,0.00077972386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003953837,0.00009178453,0.000118335694,0.0000125681045,0.000012575669,0.000007259563,0.0335647,7.976336e-7,0.000014953143,0.9583461,0.006829453,0.00096193363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016395291,0.0001270112,0.00035401215,0.00005500139,0.000010497649,0.000002594517,0.00090841344,0.000012712177,0.00036705215,0.9040261,0.09373917,0.0002334933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005441152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008044153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59742373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002400008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000237102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897401158","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v6i1.218","title":"Was Royaumont merely a dialogue de sourds? An Introduction to the discussion générale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Humanities; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06715421566981535,"score_gpt":0.3095230908987937,"score_spread":0.24236887522897838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897401158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17546749,0.00010939427,0.0021281415,0.7948815,0.0024336728,0.00033255923,0.000083665145,0.00020853567,0.024355037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220796,0.0000064270434,0.00008269742,0.0021020782,0.07456705,0.00003096512,0.000042956264,0.0000216041,0.0010665957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987459,0.00010007857,0.00024941072,0.00033380202,0.00026081604,0.000310002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.000037516646,0.00006637185,0.0004482176,0.00023314064,0.00017924698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032694498,0.0001627265,0.00020197453,0.000085450076,0.00092421594,0.0003710806,0.00028616295,0.00005298805,0.0012700505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003531981,0.00008540382,0.00010588224,0.00007256084,0.0017691328,0.00017244952,0.00011708635,0.00016556411,0.0003053258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007411926,0.00011644801,0.000105632236,0.000005321275,0.000045168734,0.0000032140006,0.026331007,0.000030658237,0.00008366209,0.9570468,0.015471417,0.00068651896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001395673,0.00042179148,0.00016542632,0.000013215638,0.00014843151,0.0000027855874,0.003675431,0.00074345025,0.00034308207,0.54923797,0.44483757,0.00027128644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002832707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018289993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79277945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032861517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003456217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015158120","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v8i1.281","title":"Potentiality, modality, and time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Appeal; Ontology; Modal; Philosophy of mind; Framing (construction); Incompatibilism; Computer science; Moral responsibility; Compatibilism; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.07937587695016678,"score_gpt":0.32656201077654456,"score_spread":0.24718613382637777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015158120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108542584,0.00036395615,0.0033430122,0.63569564,0.00036767416,0.00025542322,0.000038221744,0.0005426688,0.2508508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892091,0.0000047693634,0.00011011567,0.009642038,0.0009464322,0.0000118242915,0.0000029789476,0.000019061032,0.0000536721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984725,0.00016871869,0.00024875687,0.0005094106,0.00026501063,0.00033560253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906087,0.000157513,0.000046778372,0.00024034655,0.00003726707,0.0004572205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024194678,0.0001712153,0.0002536951,0.000025406165,0.0001485078,0.0000663085,0.0003210165,0.00014082111,0.0017792925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022035942,0.00014436156,0.00007075295,0.00024109436,0.0038250808,0.00014922977,0.00031581175,0.00026943203,0.0020802717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010994874,0.0000667909,0.00019230206,0.000011014498,0.00002564685,0.00003256976,0.0009983818,5.798236e-7,0.0006705867,0.9967757,0.00032353288,0.0007929443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028686572,0.0001936021,0.0012737507,0.0000053609965,0.000021274747,0.00001761217,0.000029370276,0.00019715849,0.00013803599,0.9966957,0.00094990566,0.00019136589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006303778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.7208974e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88066655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072228795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000111570025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135268784","doi":"10.4454/philinq.v9i1.342","title":"Naturalism, pragmatism and historical epistemology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical inquiries","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Empiricism; Philosophy; Transcendental number; Social epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Continental philosophy; Hacker; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.10408860685554613,"score_gpt":0.25658642916354485,"score_spread":0.15249782230799871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135268784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109514326,0.018399065,0.00017217435,0.5814693,0.007276194,0.000235546,0.000052489242,0.00045908775,0.2824218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901085,0.00006785869,0.0002197951,0.0035724256,0.0015056494,0.00001215705,0.000009908794,0.0000130017315,0.004490697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00008593145,0.00026495013,0.00038668752,0.00024384199,0.00025254063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924827,0.00014872356,0.00007104555,0.00022367001,0.00015634357,0.00015195103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013877233,0.0001653801,0.0002833114,0.000071339375,0.0006352314,0.00013278349,0.00016905974,0.00009154191,0.00077681185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018865737,0.00014730754,0.00007182041,0.0000546788,0.0038894298,0.0003902184,0.00013069734,0.00029433597,0.000088123765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011686965,0.000053504365,0.000027128683,0.000032862477,0.000012333044,0.00009156536,0.0068711587,1.454356e-7,0.00019436314,0.9881805,0.004027704,0.00049704436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013298733,0.00006499909,0.00006931263,0.000015276348,0.000014154643,0.000079628815,0.0001450272,0.000010258864,0.000056693392,0.5931002,0.40614524,0.00016624079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003321482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006973484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8805942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010894348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055807985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}