{"meta":{"query_hash":"f096d7169264","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism"},"cohort_total":113,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":113,"exported":113,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f096d7169264","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophy+%26+Social+Criticism"},"results":[{"id":"W1966971714","doi":"10.1177/0191453706059845","title":"On the public use of practical reason","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Legitimacy; Epistemology; Public reason; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Cornerstone; Deliberation; Generalizability theory; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24450179181631218,"score_gpt":0.3236907243889362,"score_spread":0.07918893257262402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966971714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12367663,0.00016000564,0.000063863234,0.2602989,0.0014063665,0.00034151532,0.00015932905,0.00012575962,0.6137676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115103,0.0000057021343,0.000042702115,0.0036898397,0.0036398782,0.000019420295,0.000015467915,0.000024531526,0.0014114113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867123,0.00026492286,0.00028316161,0.0001843889,0.00033048188,0.00026580846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979631,0.0013453969,0.0001194205,0.00020764166,0.0003268515,0.000037618534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032449226,0.00014677644,0.0002431373,0.000046458077,0.00063206826,0.00015725473,0.00013716685,0.00010006539,0.00030010805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005493511,0.00010918935,0.00020350033,0.00004145708,0.0013591466,0.00028310207,0.000035122834,0.00040116187,0.000073907766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015294474,0.00025895948,0.00001417528,0.00002985489,0.000027976386,0.000006469605,0.0032920092,8.875014e-8,0.00003224662,0.9797559,0.016483083,0.000083972154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012508118,0.000068254914,0.00010166452,0.000014396141,0.000046117344,0.0000013994429,0.0004682497,0.000004582002,0.000074385876,0.8434821,0.15549845,0.00011532232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002479624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020208489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86747444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024760795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056811794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5007832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972313795","doi":"10.1177/0191453707081676","title":"What's wrong with hypergoods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Adversarial system; Identification (biology); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07445549580923301,"score_gpt":0.3730622135598108,"score_spread":0.2986067177505778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972313795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023316573,0.0003663781,0.00037417308,0.10846847,0.0013354569,0.00028396622,0.000012200121,0.00032298244,0.8655198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829551,0.000060122627,0.00028733985,0.007981929,0.007801338,0.000012885081,0.0000056254735,0.00004009329,0.0008555623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689305,0.00021617913,0.0003410546,0.0003877244,0.00101642,0.0011456029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983336,0.0006133638,0.000067405075,0.0002013883,0.00030333654,0.00048091213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016055501,0.00023992785,0.00031202525,0.00010618726,0.0019957449,0.00029486,0.00041457542,0.00037399807,0.00024535373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033540095,0.00023551019,0.00017056003,0.00046830237,0.0020447543,0.0011975592,0.0000599392,0.0006395349,0.00021344842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051266896,0.00011533225,0.00007592223,0.000027059203,0.000026690994,0.00006196542,0.013089469,1.3151968e-7,0.000033612872,0.9847674,0.0002313922,0.0015197699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039679484,0.00009553167,0.00070536905,0.00006050265,0.000053621614,0.0000032668115,0.0054927943,8.26844e-7,0.00014889237,0.9498033,0.04284468,0.00039444404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000427327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045969966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95963854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020572948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024557151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972364352","doi":"10.1177/0191453708088508","title":"When was 9/11? Philosophy and the terror of futurity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; CONTEST; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Democracy; Reading (process); Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.08931219260456509,"score_gpt":0.2769279895753098,"score_spread":0.1876157969707447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972364352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08686674,0.0023027998,0.000016132444,0.23463865,0.0025265156,0.00074841443,0.00047735727,0.00023938577,0.672184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826937,0.00009360316,0.00003978155,0.0049087023,0.011400217,0.000047596594,0.000023319013,0.00005417604,0.0007389269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758404,0.00027849592,0.00064831873,0.00042252042,0.0006206187,0.00044601463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866563,0.00024127506,0.0002124667,0.00037293413,0.0003776303,0.00013007727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046833468,0.0003673282,0.0007161387,0.00011934912,0.0020022218,0.00010229405,0.00046197063,0.00018308852,0.0004220789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012219381,0.00028432978,0.0004491214,0.000054599997,0.0066659274,0.0003827556,0.00018269915,0.0005173137,0.000048577185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012881463,0.00013441307,0.00002720899,0.00016560366,0.000084862695,0.00001749938,0.12972991,5.5857456e-8,0.000018039525,0.86714214,0.0024794124,0.00007201735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018665448,0.0000739769,0.000115194656,0.000048400652,0.00014144796,0.000018331539,0.0013781618,0.0000068803083,0.000054011838,0.9645779,0.031377506,0.00034162818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052686746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016193643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89582694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031762076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006371427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974000453","doi":"10.1177/0191453704039400","title":"Freedom, Responsibility, and the ‘American Foucault’","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Michel foucault; Power (physics); Work (physics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04273902784889798,"score_gpt":0.3623916466586766,"score_spread":0.31965261880977863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974000453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15844806,0.00064535113,0.00012267723,0.5397569,0.00096892385,0.00057367154,0.00003392294,0.00023940612,0.29921108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896979,0.0001732141,0.0002965116,0.006697305,0.0027201793,0.000031791602,0.000002044583,0.000024073322,0.00035703366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973006,0.00074707816,0.0002999741,0.00037123697,0.00072285347,0.0005582219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982568,0.0009509183,0.00011402567,0.00024720762,0.0002444955,0.00018656661],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020436414,0.00019170162,0.0003790452,0.00006191996,0.0025113213,0.00018510754,0.0004136434,0.0001500475,0.00003809751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018840214,0.00015688446,0.00020274747,0.000422927,0.009471468,0.0002179204,0.00011831439,0.000532104,0.000059971277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017155353,0.00006269818,0.000085107335,0.00001286659,0.00002050974,0.000009109591,0.052796625,9.362461e-7,0.00001692301,0.9457454,0.00046076652,0.00061748864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011894206,0.000055171295,0.0015126006,0.000015621477,0.000044845547,0.0000021429596,0.0069731874,0.0000018292459,0.00001039342,0.96751505,0.022466961,0.00021277116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073322724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027255705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8312498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015138397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000343484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975131747","doi":"10.1177/0191453710372065","title":"Towards a liberal Utopia: The connection between Foucault’s reporting on the Iranian Revolution and the ethical turn","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Subject (documents); Liberalism; Michel foucault; Utopia; Sociology; Population; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Dignity; Spirituality; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08613380454572306,"score_gpt":0.3703763577411249,"score_spread":0.2842425531954018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975131747","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19421193,0.00006369691,0.000036729743,0.69032735,0.0015884379,0.0005293045,0.000011913748,0.000112506634,0.11311814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97876,0.000045473185,0.000036279645,0.011490373,0.009148513,0.000056910536,0.0000035788564,0.000022317112,0.0004365376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964,0.0012628182,0.0006220041,0.00033631315,0.0008903587,0.0004885246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644375,0.0024444752,0.0004052776,0.0002912568,0.00030480363,0.000110448644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007612717,0.00020028594,0.00031147662,0.000033512737,0.0055837664,0.0003105807,0.00043150617,0.00067406683,0.00006167788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011200945,0.000110236295,0.00025323598,0.00026886893,0.0036480962,0.0001519062,0.00009603595,0.0033269203,0.000022200742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035997145,0.000018029357,0.0002403486,0.000012076536,0.00002732712,0.0000031234415,0.050662458,1.1276079e-7,0.000036621223,0.94621164,0.0012545054,0.0014977654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043430875,0.000043017848,0.009748486,0.000030413548,0.000097436954,0.000005772247,0.004232916,0.000018051856,0.000027130522,0.9435265,0.04164818,0.0001878028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021596844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016902903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007315148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022211109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976584465","doi":"10.1177/0191453708088509","title":"Foucault's Kantian critique","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Autonomy; Politics; Michel foucault; Critical theory; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09527150179124366,"score_gpt":0.3782599142840009,"score_spread":0.28298841249275725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976584465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02805893,0.00055903994,0.00019134229,0.15159921,0.0020284872,0.0003440392,0.00004749773,0.00050220295,0.8166692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820201,0.00039195063,0.00031978142,0.0075843465,0.006385106,0.00003550461,0.0000117913505,0.00004902593,0.0032024116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686193,0.00044682817,0.00038794335,0.0004446133,0.0009632239,0.00089546037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998568,0.0003227846,0.00008007681,0.00023114527,0.00046297887,0.0003349956],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065119367,0.0002624194,0.0003765879,0.00011403155,0.0039385995,0.000102612335,0.0005234217,0.0004742461,0.0005479743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055651,0.00030461585,0.00032272356,0.00041435947,0.002195316,0.0004957926,0.0000716186,0.0006815005,0.00046833296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015995429,0.00015691627,0.00022234989,0.000036258814,0.000024731873,0.00012581352,0.06378103,2.1042507e-7,0.000066839435,0.9168311,0.018256547,0.00048225446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041744157,0.00005430413,0.0011965499,0.000032742417,0.00003699855,0.0000123762675,0.004515074,0.0000031602779,0.00010516157,0.6397305,0.35337994,0.0005157398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019073455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068312435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95396113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014744785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004721881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978027423","doi":"10.1177/0191453707084277","title":"Rereading `Truth and Politics'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Dignity; Relation (database); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0903241002453109,"score_gpt":0.3440955269585413,"score_spread":0.2537714267132304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978027423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12481937,0.0003442347,0.000083813706,0.056525465,0.0007570333,0.000301194,0.00008267357,0.0004126908,0.8166735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873414,0.00006446,0.0002281103,0.003531068,0.008008069,0.000026103246,0.0000075660346,0.000050960447,0.0007422641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689656,0.00033460304,0.0003924421,0.00049323525,0.00076195976,0.0011212238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0005220841,0.000068393536,0.00020976235,0.00023222598,0.00065534725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038790406,0.0002746575,0.0004133616,0.00016004308,0.003325657,0.00009415054,0.0003446538,0.00026448249,0.0002049798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010845152,0.0003186306,0.00018214768,0.00033146868,0.0026943462,0.00044391752,0.0001271054,0.00039780943,0.00020964243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005877311,0.000068726506,0.00025567185,0.00002770329,0.000020228446,0.000068175446,0.012674431,4.9655455e-8,0.000033717624,0.9857606,0.0008881294,0.00019667989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035751658,0.000040919804,0.00092105556,0.000024051496,0.000035636866,0.000014716548,0.0007285032,0.0000045442016,0.00007451955,0.9718353,0.025568774,0.00039444282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076870987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022113938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.862522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021136133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022063206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981764967","doi":"10.1177/0191453709103426","title":"Who are we?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Epistemology; Power (physics); Independence (probability theory); Relation (database); Self; Gender studies; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09788463452352035,"score_gpt":0.3868567061719456,"score_spread":0.28897207164842525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981764967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034667351,0.00078431494,0.000045665638,0.41021708,0.0008264731,0.00017094892,0.000022154074,0.00024907195,0.58421755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97945213,0.0004232459,0.000089583235,0.01122912,0.005837525,0.000008020364,0.0000035962935,0.000019400286,0.0029373516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977805,0.00025036052,0.0002600332,0.00031741196,0.00074930117,0.0006423762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991069,0.0001603728,0.00008604431,0.0001666089,0.0002573849,0.00022268557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005114676,0.00018861912,0.00032425177,0.000071742914,0.0018634729,0.00014797322,0.0004031539,0.00034164335,0.00026455714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003781871,0.00021010273,0.00022517807,0.00032029653,0.00069427874,0.00031795463,0.000029769002,0.00047677296,0.00022191097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116301935,0.00010398481,0.000053664557,0.0000178898,0.000009976278,0.000022364726,0.040768735,2.3793612e-7,0.000023808398,0.9381449,0.018272087,0.0025707108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019531511,0.000039404214,0.0009949191,0.00005075471,0.000021636779,5.341057e-7,0.0039923815,0.0000019434026,0.00001987679,0.7650385,0.22940283,0.00024192536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020949506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023944257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012379783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015406341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989270617","doi":"10.1177/0191453710375589","title":"The racialization of Muslim veils: A philosophical analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"North African History and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Sociology; Oppression; Gender studies; Islam; Racism; Feminism; Argument (complex analysis); Mirroring; Identity (music); Dilemma; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Race (biology); Politics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.019745434483190303,"score_gpt":0.24572683442477647,"score_spread":0.22598139994158617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989270617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30677187,0.000696398,0.00009607277,0.04293098,0.004577515,0.00057378854,0.000565736,0.0002688765,0.64351875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930584,0.0000041131293,0.000014908806,0.00072248233,0.0054138964,0.000024492592,0.000040936466,0.000018436107,0.00070236257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987631,0.000103196966,0.00036267034,0.00021105458,0.00032353666,0.00023645969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990445,0.00016965329,0.00013842397,0.00023723899,0.00033974135,0.00007044195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002638748,0.00015967569,0.0002930378,0.00013933145,0.001450453,0.00013537277,0.000271805,0.00010732704,0.00077112584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012275706,0.00012350993,0.00037309402,0.00022575376,0.0010832436,0.00017445936,0.00003233858,0.0004093119,0.00001956778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026719137,0.0000799028,0.00004939174,0.000021125586,0.00015986567,0.0000033234048,0.041583095,3.8563041e-7,0.00013094481,0.95706266,0.00048225382,0.00040031134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026830434,0.00006193076,0.00037339595,0.0000068801182,0.0005821131,8.550083e-7,0.0014143275,0.000035137113,0.000035007623,0.5933376,0.40362394,0.0002605456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002760714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003878092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6862865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001681678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003886652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990841610","doi":"10.1177/0191453707087255","title":"Identifying concrete ethical demands in the face of the abstract other","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Common ground; Face-to-face; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Social science; Communication; Physics; History","score_opus":0.16159937633107055,"score_gpt":0.33031478086820937,"score_spread":0.16871540453713882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990841610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36904532,0.000613256,0.0000136411945,0.10057069,0.0018978082,0.000492188,0.00019144871,0.00007878007,0.52709687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548555,0.00001827136,0.0000064636206,0.010803212,0.0033272284,0.000023490551,0.000004338558,0.000030507146,0.00030095762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980056,0.0002678917,0.0004979225,0.00023910728,0.0006566018,0.0003328446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999044,0.00032964995,0.00014481397,0.00028834326,0.00015363026,0.00003957317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006694634,0.00020538732,0.0003249177,0.000060401333,0.0011914198,0.000092693466,0.000629868,0.00024863638,0.00028496434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013950527,0.00013771873,0.00035561225,0.00007845431,0.002148211,0.00016821755,0.00008281072,0.0012301351,0.000048507583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017285962,0.000028796489,0.000042064567,0.000075835116,0.000028634317,0.000014315395,0.18374652,4.257789e-7,0.00017143151,0.81488454,0.00097019126,0.000019964034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006700248,0.000041220952,0.0023965428,0.00010843615,0.00006919885,0.000013050854,0.007577797,0.0000076004326,0.00020098472,0.96745676,0.021152737,0.00030564165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049201725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019973393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6164402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029057848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060723538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990995192","doi":"10.1177/0191453710363573","title":"Does Levinas justify or transcend liberalism? Levinas on human liberation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Hegelianism; Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Morality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Classical liberalism; Relation (database); Sociology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12900824124953392,"score_gpt":0.342126159120029,"score_spread":0.2131179178704951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990995192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15554304,0.0000857636,0.000012713796,0.17610651,0.013438148,0.0008890942,0.0006814863,0.00083573785,0.6524075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95067626,0.000012824114,0.000051384166,0.0078761075,0.03049839,0.000084599575,0.0001357299,0.00012054292,0.0105441725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970532,0.00017664833,0.0006881999,0.00069915963,0.0007053564,0.0006774552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858445,0.00019330512,0.00016128752,0.00046482228,0.00037292886,0.0002232318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836927,0.0005404988,0.00059248233,0.00020308814,0.0028987573,0.00072675664,0.0005184439,0.00039829698,0.0036078931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010531781,0.00038560777,0.0004663557,0.00007839456,0.0013962135,0.0007017534,0.00005770818,0.001415513,0.0003529442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011099976,0.00036140482,0.0000027500778,0.00021709649,0.00006620617,0.00004176825,0.04781275,2.2200318e-7,0.0023199369,0.9444746,0.003901059,0.00069122354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000909714,0.00028805385,0.0000969858,0.00008218459,0.00017172883,0.000004370097,0.00076176086,0.0000045968645,0.0008606694,0.7524398,0.24369626,0.00068386516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026675762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020285212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79513323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061605475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093872906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993291480","doi":"10.1177/0191453702028002803","title":"‘By a hair’s breadth’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Criticism; Philosophy; Transcendence (philosophy); Relation (database); Hegelianism; Morality; Dilemma; Facticity; Sensibility; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.10212424500594351,"score_gpt":0.2790599735199922,"score_spread":0.17693572851404865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993291480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003172171,0.0013873867,0.000020755031,0.07448275,0.002195219,0.00022111149,0.00049018016,0.0004070553,0.9176234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96676964,0.00004460093,0.000019370145,0.010153366,0.012240512,0.000048615402,0.000049325554,0.00007506809,0.010599484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787253,0.00010876106,0.0004410427,0.00044407503,0.0005340865,0.00059953175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991215,0.000093508264,0.00009630135,0.00027216878,0.00023956383,0.0001769554],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017003843,0.00034219038,0.0004198759,0.00010229298,0.0014651259,0.00033708202,0.00038750915,0.00018404698,0.0060010636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055224376,0.00035943437,0.0003631548,0.000059833328,0.0011353564,0.00043305117,0.00008009796,0.00050747674,0.0017505145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097460315,0.00023002742,0.0000019875476,0.00006868936,0.00005637054,0.000019484136,0.03953878,5.12701e-8,0.00008987007,0.8432572,0.11605415,0.0006736763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044621655,0.00006490387,0.000004585079,0.000022353304,0.00006240014,0.0000040869136,0.00060455315,0.000024189741,0.000036490055,0.5877482,0.4105954,0.00038661464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024539154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007231238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064748514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014948513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997327048","doi":"10.1177/0191453704044027","title":"Writing and Judging","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Opposition (politics); Relation (database); Reading (process); Ontology; Natural (archaeology); Linguistics; Law; History; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.05163508035317287,"score_gpt":0.3516591644549223,"score_spread":0.3000240841017494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997327048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13202055,0.00041761206,0.00034662746,0.19634345,0.00053799775,0.00037891357,0.000042612985,0.00052104343,0.6693912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886914,0.000023482617,0.00054245285,0.0050248927,0.005566942,0.000026250795,0.000004299626,0.000041520947,0.00007877602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748677,0.00018575718,0.00035771838,0.00042620915,0.0006368351,0.00090671773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898714,0.00021236087,0.000059861904,0.00014525962,0.00017144487,0.00042393425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005775336,0.00022421448,0.00031345585,0.00012377718,0.002170202,0.00020624237,0.00028445182,0.00020380486,0.000095080795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056199334,0.0002684727,0.00014740191,0.00032203156,0.0013332042,0.0004954003,0.000117791045,0.00037773605,0.0001378888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049846903,0.000060161576,0.00012064579,0.000033245044,0.000013787317,0.00003180318,0.010291172,6.6406585e-7,0.0001121579,0.9882806,0.000062743165,0.0009880612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049516564,0.000033052474,0.0005590004,0.000052384294,0.000030668863,0.0000031926013,0.0016333653,0.0000013508132,0.000104721184,0.992286,0.0044809883,0.00032010008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075597974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078702775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85667086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024130588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017707702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997564287","doi":"10.1177/0191453704047014","title":"Some reflections on Kearney’s hermeneutics of religion","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Religious studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.09904738055717369,"score_gpt":0.32292675171670476,"score_spread":0.22387937115953108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997564287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098645784,0.00051783887,0.000007363481,0.034340348,0.002139709,0.000374362,0.00011059424,0.00026117798,0.8636028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888351,0.00015579088,0.000040730265,0.0031724141,0.0073253447,0.000025497675,0.000013582344,0.000037580634,0.00039393565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862105,0.000051518808,0.00036522222,0.00027742336,0.00038996138,0.0002948309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936414,0.000067886955,0.000113029346,0.00019831787,0.00018004405,0.00007659937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010450557,0.00022500385,0.000308324,0.00015586746,0.0008895676,0.000061872066,0.00018629256,0.00010993573,0.00007213479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003469937,0.00022622242,0.0002683265,0.00007817273,0.0004933017,0.0002063757,0.00003623236,0.00029407136,0.0001685919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060052032,0.00034348713,0.0000018404627,0.00005871609,0.000045361277,0.0000074359577,0.020990903,0.000013821646,0.00019059253,0.9772134,0.0009502159,0.00012419252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006449423,0.0004944723,0.000031109164,0.0000779071,0.00006489543,0.0000021283972,0.00047912795,6.559878e-7,0.00069406745,0.9689765,0.028300235,0.00023393492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022570076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005764935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89018935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008909233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048843318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92250824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001209934","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700404","title":"Two refoundation projects of democracy in contemporary French philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Sociology; The Imaginary; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.12489647556157049,"score_gpt":0.3157222961657883,"score_spread":0.1908258206042178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001209934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08335965,0.00037224614,0.0000253071,0.011382116,0.0004882746,0.0003689198,0.00006399736,0.00009788226,0.9038416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942081,0.00001773311,0.000045625067,0.0015422092,0.0032919676,0.000046522597,0.000048727583,0.00003713013,0.0007619575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980961,0.0002107655,0.0006194822,0.0003360323,0.00037031542,0.00036728548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991529,0.00019081523,0.000111336776,0.00021324838,0.00024791373,0.000083801155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003675703,0.00024193183,0.000441991,0.00021353368,0.0003928623,0.00008321302,0.00025835156,0.00008999728,0.0013027388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012927678,0.00024252065,0.00017962963,0.00013838506,0.0008100468,0.000542584,0.00007125073,0.00029394022,0.00009524361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067614055,0.00033876303,0.00030244456,0.00015671719,0.000019927375,0.00004533043,0.009157327,1.16461095e-7,0.00009375883,0.9884224,0.0005348897,0.0008606913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010013822,0.00009791673,0.00024726085,0.00010487456,0.000022628867,0.0000029617636,0.0011573691,0.000013332405,0.000068606205,0.9850027,0.0120004825,0.00028051223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053931936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011274422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056402627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008184107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002513787","doi":"10.1177/0191453705051708","title":"Enlightened relativism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Presumption; Universalism; Virtue; Relation (database); Moral relativism; Commensurability (mathematics); Universality (dynamical systems); Happiness; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06607350176528959,"score_gpt":0.27304574534811293,"score_spread":0.20697224358282335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002513787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007837389,0.0003313787,0.00003099249,0.1418118,0.00054475217,0.00013320647,0.00006135043,0.00024400988,0.8490051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721679,0.000013546889,0.000074821844,0.010649163,0.014967341,0.00002937295,0.000015068056,0.000050312487,0.0020324746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839824,0.00011230835,0.00035874933,0.00031938832,0.00039662197,0.00041466305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919677,0.00019618093,0.00007351651,0.000198353,0.0001998042,0.00013537084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003065016,0.00024286864,0.00030356256,0.00009346244,0.0010794518,0.0001562566,0.00027326687,0.00015306254,0.0025896677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008535986,0.00022804429,0.00025428124,0.00004901404,0.00086627406,0.00038286258,0.00007892675,0.0005616335,0.0010809026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018912257,0.00014110372,0.0000010532001,0.000023039378,0.000036880054,0.000009014244,0.016365906,2.9242713e-7,0.0000738216,0.9808562,0.00064728863,0.0018265322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029366525,0.00003795149,0.00001398629,0.0000162547,0.000028621735,0.0000013905653,0.00014147746,0.000017701308,0.00007035535,0.7557063,0.24343534,0.00023694511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021007123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034065975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005763529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038103186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007138063","doi":"10.1177/0191453707077017","title":"On the philosophy/rhetoric binaries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Epistemology; Rationality; Rhetorical question; Politics; Philosophy of language; Political philosophy; Sociology; Facticity; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07139913334783482,"score_gpt":0.35377023623000886,"score_spread":0.28237110288217404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007138063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015448103,0.0002146827,0.00023675564,0.16968463,0.0014387371,0.000453367,0.00003877547,0.00030151504,0.81218344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757549,0.000023622611,0.00003945065,0.012507974,0.010988593,0.00003881116,0.0000064857823,0.000051950537,0.0005881808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606246,0.0006417582,0.0005051319,0.00051077484,0.0011843614,0.0010954961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543434,0.0034349863,0.00009707142,0.00039043522,0.00029429552,0.00034886014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003043041,0.0003627165,0.00038879635,0.00015944708,0.0046631726,0.00020812651,0.0008375535,0.0003325907,0.0011217038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001664859,0.00030209983,0.00041828514,0.00087039697,0.0026596573,0.00030730784,0.000106620624,0.0007763374,0.00074666704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013400729,0.00022905858,0.00001681783,0.00002337365,0.000023901473,0.000045933022,0.0075996164,2.526347e-7,0.00007974587,0.98950267,0.0016856067,0.00065902114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025123524,0.000114058224,0.000064125685,0.000037560334,0.000038386916,0.00000154252,0.0011205582,6.763112e-7,0.00018786224,0.91934043,0.07848135,0.00036218992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007255703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024892393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021724458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000945434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011612764","doi":"10.1177/0191453712470359","title":"Indigeneity and the Settler Contract today","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Indigenous; Argumentation theory; Politics; Sociology; Function (biology); Contract theory; Register (sociolinguistics); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.0213920063746631,"score_gpt":0.3028423077349425,"score_spread":0.2814503013602794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011612764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4052176,0.0005680373,0.000011491675,0.07039141,0.0009226491,0.0011810787,0.000015771555,0.00008299627,0.521609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911109,0.0009002796,0.000034991284,0.0019308602,0.004031573,0.000026246531,0.000005334448,0.000014880501,0.0019449162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980494,0.0005657708,0.00025225518,0.00021759371,0.00037460699,0.00054041046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.0004471129,0.00008380713,0.00012955205,0.00026960523,0.00017072077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00099191,0.00013398583,0.00023107685,0.00004124555,0.011698407,0.00018517075,0.00023477688,0.00017816959,0.00048019362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028461207,0.00009168797,0.00009642592,0.00014943132,0.0015025053,0.00032645676,0.0000030247154,0.0002516583,0.00020557982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064836545,0.00004352553,0.00015922631,0.000012137443,0.000012127574,5.403092e-7,0.27638292,1.35653675e-8,9.956872e-7,0.7228186,0.00027428017,0.00028913716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058252976,0.000017362263,0.008768951,0.000009058341,0.000031595213,0.000001151888,0.003935535,0.0000015361395,0.000016389582,0.7672192,0.21923079,0.00018591796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11273173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08833628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58589333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010052931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019363991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017111246","doi":"10.1177/0191453708102097","title":"Review essay: The Rivers North of the Future: The Testament of Ivan Illich, as told to David Cayley, foreword by Charles Taylor (Toronto: Anansi Press, 2004), 252 pp","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art history; History","score_opus":0.009390463256801802,"score_gpt":0.23031384118572226,"score_spread":0.22092337792892047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017111246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14864106,0.28922546,0.00009134096,0.43738866,0.001485784,0.0065236986,0.0012509597,0.00012044227,0.1152726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96794504,0.008925232,0.00004633255,0.022166526,0.00039009185,0.000055043154,0.000010866989,0.000022810802,0.0004380819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980633,0.00015492717,0.00037344525,0.00033597127,0.000745202,0.00032714952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911314,0.000061727544,0.00024032888,0.00045985612,0.000016133024,0.00010883046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001773107,0.00025758106,0.00034563956,0.000005533105,0.00051393383,0.0000065442355,0.0008905199,0.00006045677,0.00026730483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021810998,0.00014020462,0.00028711246,0.0001816939,0.002663461,0.00013957435,0.00022886452,0.00019843344,0.000031248605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002466383,0.0023415554,0.0027173108,0.00057650765,0.00027887887,0.000016661841,0.034369294,0.00019452636,0.008213715,0.030664152,0.7379054,0.18247536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037767936,0.00043725397,0.030206738,0.00025201254,0.00029182772,0.0000075787925,0.00168992,0.0000069025937,0.0005871122,0.014736406,0.95088005,0.00052653207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016419195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032951412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81930393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004070265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021750473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019004653","doi":"10.1177/0191453708098755","title":"The separation of religion and politics in a post-secular society","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Secularization; Secularism; Politics; Democracy; Confessional; Legitimacy; Sociology; Neutrality; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Law; Citizenship; Political science","score_opus":0.021230916381688718,"score_gpt":0.358340441537282,"score_spread":0.3371095251555933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019004653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5445326,0.0016658552,0.00011626853,0.28735468,0.0004484735,0.00054685987,0.000022428574,0.000095537696,0.1652173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935766,0.0013499976,0.00007707117,0.0041603134,0.000510737,0.000007705255,0.0000036292145,0.0000057171364,0.00030826527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887335,0.00015495619,0.00026064905,0.0001363751,0.00031435012,0.0002603014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993662,0.0001961214,0.00006938253,0.00008419177,0.00021951992,0.00006457324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040731952,0.000086163665,0.00014104185,0.000025045518,0.0011166437,0.00008151856,0.0001237358,0.00014046056,0.0000049622668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018312405,0.00007891955,0.00018976808,0.0002090429,0.0004358521,0.00017813414,0.0000149164525,0.00019345107,0.000004328657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063393413,0.000052270843,0.000058452333,0.0000057635725,0.000010508639,9.0954074e-7,0.029824229,4.732829e-7,0.00044184696,0.96556777,0.0032826622,0.00074879004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040756128,0.000109585635,0.0043267375,0.000031882126,0.000032352375,0.0000019108488,0.009413612,0.00007261796,0.00014009472,0.93391925,0.051345177,0.000199223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008828067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024256606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44904396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010052321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010751485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8588433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020223199","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700102","title":"Ethics, affinity and the coming communities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Sociology; Politics; Democracy; Epistemology; Morality; Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Deleuze and Guattari; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16584730910609577,"score_gpt":0.3243625792274877,"score_spread":0.1585152701213919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020223199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04646232,0.0013106404,0.000021758267,0.23101737,0.0016927349,0.00032037412,0.00011973014,0.00023649256,0.7188186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97541267,0.00027744446,0.000017042128,0.016700357,0.0066890093,0.000036866106,0.000023012013,0.00004066228,0.0008029105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979254,0.0006642787,0.00038643132,0.0001980821,0.0004270333,0.00039876642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978682,0.0013192855,0.000104921426,0.00029216625,0.00032850436,0.00008696604],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012234651,0.00026762983,0.00042773574,0.00007461637,0.0046245493,0.00049763615,0.0004127906,0.00019088449,0.00042228313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020632858,0.00021349022,0.0002260835,0.000043928045,0.005825884,0.00032075576,0.00020484392,0.0014587842,0.00006828556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007696981,0.00004871348,0.000012073164,0.000060426166,0.000049813905,0.0000070361807,0.23309201,1.2277026e-7,0.0000026465757,0.7659535,0.0005572126,0.00013948586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011617045,0.000032673564,0.00004818498,0.00004666276,0.00009600366,0.000009594029,0.02195301,0.00002267342,0.000004109334,0.8849428,0.091415554,0.00026702776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022757489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017909192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92895037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030344698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047213984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020397579","doi":"10.1177/0191453710363863","title":"Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of politics: A humanism in extension","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Politics; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.04988725265117938,"score_gpt":0.35628248609657315,"score_spread":0.30639523344539377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020397579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38720092,0.00014195802,0.000028834416,0.047102824,0.0014751712,0.0005220629,0.00008594446,0.0001869967,0.56325525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929234,0.000012381397,0.00035503184,0.0021960929,0.0041712583,0.0000449723,0.00001009263,0.000053176067,0.00023358902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963056,0.0004399644,0.0007475987,0.00054871914,0.0007509801,0.0012071528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982853,0.00042268555,0.00015112912,0.0003838034,0.00039056895,0.00036653838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083960244,0.00029813527,0.00065264374,0.000364803,0.0007549805,0.000048129798,0.0006653661,0.00050256844,0.0006286794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001151373,0.00034587106,0.0002516525,0.00044006732,0.0025863904,0.00032568263,0.00016259718,0.0009092178,0.00016336523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001533154,0.00032104345,0.00015546073,0.000042030573,0.000016883008,0.00003336544,0.014030024,1.8227603e-7,0.004184776,0.9806834,0.00013735627,0.0003801858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059992203,0.00009477308,0.0018781715,0.000025647572,0.000032469292,0.000002261926,0.0013126562,0.0000046031796,0.00035530634,0.9861338,0.009219117,0.0003412292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00252786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012934051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017696408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003085675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023324461","doi":"10.1177/0191453710387077","title":"Paul Ricoeur on life and death","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1563265230942362,"score_gpt":0.2730612223422285,"score_spread":0.11673469924799232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023324461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31625178,0.000120522316,0.000002029218,0.0030321283,0.0004832639,0.00012133103,0.000068403104,0.00007156028,0.67984897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932339,0.00001661858,0.000008840964,0.0031795658,0.0021247899,0.000015189347,0.0000038190997,0.000021279142,0.0013959833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917597,0.000055844102,0.00017127098,0.00020320015,0.00017076387,0.00022294366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996198,0.000036855672,0.000038957423,0.00008947516,0.00010362256,0.00011130915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010150014,0.0001451537,0.00018364421,0.0000565316,0.0007029176,0.000106109066,0.00009799716,0.00004916538,0.0016291746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004103952,0.00013469032,0.000079170924,0.000020949128,0.0002237127,0.00014806312,0.000042390104,0.00015503012,0.00018612556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017119086,0.0001324719,0.0002169261,0.000021842907,0.000026973623,0.000013341843,0.011738815,4.442885e-9,0.000013706236,0.98436123,0.0031693566,0.00028823316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035236374,0.0002104905,0.007170118,0.000015330455,0.000038637612,8.3239826e-7,0.0006200216,0.0000035350674,0.000076255914,0.944154,0.047095083,0.00026333667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014231764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014841286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67845297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016881771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019896073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034192068","doi":"10.1177/0191453709340635","title":"Habermas and analytical Marxism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Marxist philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Convergence (economics); Order (exchange); Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05466725794605905,"score_gpt":0.36848215686473396,"score_spread":0.3138148989186749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034192068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017205136,0.00032814327,0.00011268641,0.20024352,0.0002716789,0.00021178015,0.000022302258,0.00020704689,0.7813977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682904,0.00004426208,0.00016056727,0.008542715,0.0039525814,0.000007235192,0.0000046786677,0.000015830856,0.00044311763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978591,0.00034854744,0.00029331035,0.00038643306,0.0005021023,0.0006105144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989518,0.00034134666,0.000034004388,0.00015355536,0.00013513837,0.00038418442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067477184,0.00020760548,0.0003343058,0.00008716619,0.0014950816,0.00016193521,0.0002577439,0.00023904245,0.0003706272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040608944,0.0002267008,0.00018237684,0.00031333108,0.001217374,0.000330229,0.00004523857,0.0003590283,0.00009976888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031633477,0.000119409204,0.00004273564,0.000011711619,0.000012370688,0.00003303185,0.0029858015,6.170953e-8,0.000043510183,0.99114764,0.0005240696,0.0050480496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028409707,0.00007860129,0.00056109845,0.000015734131,0.00004957767,0.0000028762483,0.00032614113,0.000010289791,0.000017179469,0.9484535,0.04992682,0.00027409577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034407556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003715249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96962386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061781364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041926218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037872203","doi":"10.1177/0191453704039399","title":"Judging Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Appeal; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.10059322322153721,"score_gpt":0.3836437579131794,"score_spread":0.2830505346916422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037872203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006497064,0.00013793606,0.0004206681,0.20750932,0.0010375924,0.00018022176,0.000026387599,0.0003375607,0.78385323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773234,0.000031142845,0.0003663232,0.012885762,0.009011524,0.000019738782,0.000004830484,0.000030716397,0.0003265352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746984,0.00021272986,0.00030492555,0.0003422443,0.00077875296,0.00089152326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998874,0.0003016906,0.000054294906,0.00016674309,0.00023264361,0.0003706024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146873,0.00019853824,0.00026551716,0.00008758228,0.0028835386,0.00012970057,0.00042043312,0.00032306864,0.00020651973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004893,0.00023052626,0.00021655565,0.00037914034,0.0014341166,0.00042827957,0.00007261566,0.00061376096,0.0006305406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008805543,0.00010250495,0.0000066306493,0.00005348769,0.000013837497,0.000029005401,0.014039049,0.0000021560645,0.000048616595,0.9852018,0.00024163758,0.00025246578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039104378,0.000027442082,0.00009584123,0.00003469219,0.00009228776,0.0000014436429,0.001183036,9.838747e-7,0.00007986993,0.9779684,0.019840105,0.00028484626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077951705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000740337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003176099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003742805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037889083","doi":"10.1177/0191453712467317","title":"The dialectic of beauty and agency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Hegelianism; Dialectic; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Moral agency; Agency (philosophy); Morality; Epistemology; Romanticism; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.059458883735820346,"score_gpt":0.35793245700438603,"score_spread":0.29847357326856566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037889083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20527153,0.0038364688,0.000058259524,0.07944665,0.0018862609,0.0005859743,0.00005905318,0.00016899817,0.7086868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935003,0.00009366459,0.000055536813,0.00082040875,0.005311576,0.000031251424,0.0000015734286,0.000024126484,0.00016158483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974503,0.00046109813,0.00034740393,0.00019159028,0.00059660483,0.0009529854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998368,0.0008077089,0.00008865266,0.00017891101,0.00016673915,0.00038996854],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011189111,0.00016519935,0.00026141314,0.00005429115,0.0019680574,0.000064219326,0.00032323538,0.00015104254,0.00007759805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013362243,0.00014200472,0.00015612,0.00028639054,0.0021971287,0.00035862465,0.00010431446,0.00025195154,0.000052739175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009026142,0.00008435672,0.0007963546,0.000026620844,0.000022295197,0.0000010352499,0.01978103,1.2683096e-8,0.00009491568,0.9773358,0.0002977804,0.0015507321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015809792,0.00003497315,0.006255081,0.000011421954,0.000052343312,8.2124967e-7,0.0005537335,7.2788185e-7,0.00012361995,0.9711769,0.021456089,0.00017616354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005100171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059948125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78822875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012983901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011477333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040613870","doi":"10.1177/0191453708098537","title":"Alain Badiou: the event of becoming a political subject","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Subject (documents); Political subjectivity; Injustice; Political philosophy; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Political communication; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09000295662650046,"score_gpt":0.3702673443515875,"score_spread":0.280264387725087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040613870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32702744,0.0013997942,0.00033923693,0.058635052,0.0020786754,0.00053021306,0.00028541044,0.00015946582,0.6095447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744184,0.000013081241,0.00006132457,0.006927997,0.004764502,0.00006230454,0.000017499126,0.000062154475,0.00064928783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966292,0.00054536125,0.0007919287,0.0004626427,0.00055400975,0.0010168914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811095,0.00066453824,0.00016365969,0.0006320693,0.00020530981,0.00022345016],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045426987,0.00034449756,0.0006520297,0.00018500048,0.0006749007,0.000018821742,0.0006112744,0.00025652358,0.0006786845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015227466,0.00029743934,0.0007209106,0.00040334687,0.0011511723,0.0000860416,0.00008307811,0.0005371062,0.0002629273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645881,0.00046816352,0.0014250745,0.000038475933,0.0003404563,0.000068481626,0.007373442,4.5935317e-7,0.0000887388,0.9854843,0.0045069465,0.00013902257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014035092,0.00021372655,0.020525048,0.000033650158,0.0003972631,0.00014554891,0.0012820319,0.000017147171,0.00024087784,0.9668256,0.008386018,0.0005295829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038693854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001207882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6604144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011200152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010095168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040816758","doi":"10.1177/0191453714564460","title":"The populist threat to pluralism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Normative; Mainstream; Politics; Authoritarianism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Populism; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03988248774589045,"score_gpt":0.3547692246226085,"score_spread":0.3148867368767181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040816758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008441567,0.00011928732,0.00019262299,0.3239354,0.0012001579,0.0003402834,0.000025988027,0.00021585423,0.66552883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774094,0.000017708602,0.00008361917,0.011846156,0.009396996,0.00006473453,0.000004882512,0.000033520777,0.0011429338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970094,0.00077183696,0.00033579816,0.00037614,0.0007081984,0.00079861225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978285,0.0011642096,0.000043711087,0.00031403702,0.00023682899,0.00041272567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015556504,0.0002252706,0.00028718612,0.000052800267,0.005494888,0.00033286124,0.0007646814,0.0001765147,0.00019480627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015207012,0.00018833809,0.00026194728,0.00040838632,0.0012470497,0.00021252094,0.00012130524,0.00032984684,0.0006221609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003543048,0.000042280666,0.000022477823,0.00000753693,0.000012284225,0.000003351266,0.0070757954,2.7733913e-7,0.000033245655,0.98570424,0.0022358024,0.0048272465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011793627,0.000037471036,0.00008257928,0.000010527183,0.000017351938,4.8113037e-7,0.00058377016,0.0000013273009,0.000025430498,0.649591,0.34934855,0.0001835364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035978138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016385046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96896785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010410358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046706613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99579984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042984934","doi":"10.1177/0191453714553292","title":"Amartya Sen on human rights in <i>The Idea of Justice</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Doctrine; Law; Right to property; International human rights law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.09979330218532002,"score_gpt":0.3920623522175497,"score_spread":0.2922690500322297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042984934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043920375,0.000017524531,0.000015085459,0.06421806,0.00036963727,0.00023448942,0.000024010988,0.000056454937,0.89114434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98665565,0.0000018321039,0.000025802805,0.008589382,0.004547303,0.00002039424,0.000005796875,0.000013225558,0.00014063732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967015,0.0010852512,0.00042501866,0.00028364305,0.00090960437,0.0005950267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980228,0.0013534675,0.00009028144,0.000248961,0.00014575067,0.00013876251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018616566,0.00018504815,0.000337268,0.000094710114,0.0017007418,0.000056499608,0.0006154615,0.0002850235,0.00007379873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060247147,0.00015710933,0.0001912993,0.00035466405,0.001545914,0.0001647858,0.000041453677,0.0006363008,0.00009990332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016955953,0.00019653424,0.000020731666,0.00006115885,0.000006983868,0.0000065246027,0.010822991,5.3249676e-7,0.00004312068,0.98779917,0.0009576762,0.000067607376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032641683,0.00010723022,0.0004660025,0.00004515969,0.000056436747,3.425496e-7,0.0003441868,0.000002991484,0.0000874052,0.961518,0.036862783,0.00018305134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019972778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071636704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94273525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007886269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056361125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045812085","doi":"10.1177/019145370002600101","title":"Bodies and eternity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Resentment; Eternity; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Symbol (formal); Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.052333659703895676,"score_gpt":0.2722995665847964,"score_spread":0.21996590688090076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045812085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2445201,0.0013473395,9.774362e-7,0.0064704465,0.0003119802,0.00012778987,0.00008656958,0.00013562641,0.74699914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767977,0.00019733433,0.000025356163,0.0026391302,0.0044706143,0.00002078219,0.000009908088,0.000026159678,0.015813012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998998,0.000051320996,0.00020572431,0.0002529278,0.00019509204,0.00029697138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996317,0.000052960793,0.000026237301,0.00012076828,0.000077473145,0.00009085727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011527868,0.00017886393,0.00024266391,0.000041292667,0.0010857785,0.000263777,0.00013006604,0.00006357342,0.010290853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014868711,0.00017218511,0.000108834145,0.000011799864,0.0005682931,0.00033047996,0.000035202556,0.00021264952,0.00061120425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005035507,0.00014292025,0.0001179856,0.00010613612,0.000054306198,0.000018758476,0.08904733,4.130554e-8,0.000048567897,0.87965316,0.019257613,0.011502802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045527885,0.000075058895,0.0007026334,0.00002346532,0.0000564988,0.0000033542137,0.0015406985,0.0000032830426,0.00003948925,0.40698603,0.5897868,0.00032739923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018035139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024767008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7322776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015832991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014592733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048879095","doi":"10.1177/0191453707087253","title":"Marcuse, human nature, and the foundations of ethical norms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Aside; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Critical theory; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06742565816448766,"score_gpt":0.3857678541651514,"score_spread":0.31834219600066377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048879095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08297504,0.00040908577,0.00006657592,0.21140927,0.00040012223,0.0004460107,0.000048284175,0.00010016649,0.70414543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254644,0.00007490933,0.00006310856,0.004925397,0.0021458443,0.00002807166,0.000006816131,0.000016329272,0.00019307478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978227,0.0007095758,0.00033494472,0.00023660071,0.0005705882,0.00032561307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803185,0.001342337,0.0000644751,0.00017001401,0.00025648583,0.00013482681],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011909768,0.0001452907,0.00032879412,0.00005924387,0.0034757939,0.00004660292,0.0003399439,0.0004940323,0.00020724312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010123517,0.000115302384,0.00021471079,0.00031059844,0.008090593,0.00015897634,0.00008934509,0.0011421222,0.000018522685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052363364,0.00006992344,0.000074604395,0.000024016494,0.000023539727,0.0000064787487,0.011131939,4.917354e-8,0.00004977458,0.9882052,0.00026639845,0.00009573078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068739377,0.000029368399,0.0005310213,0.00001386347,0.000041902105,0.0000038614075,0.00048321518,0.0000011836538,0.00004351199,0.985164,0.012856318,0.00014434752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021316804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000416226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031659678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007283081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049740818","doi":"10.1177/0191453705050607","title":"The substantive dimension of deliberative practical rationality","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rationality; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Democracy; Solidarity; Discourse ethics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08146968872510021,"score_gpt":0.41019209574236193,"score_spread":0.32872240701726174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049740818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05708705,0.00054211996,0.00056563306,0.40685198,0.00061778084,0.00060690334,0.000090931644,0.00012063079,0.533517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947826,0.000056652298,0.00039167245,0.0015977283,0.0029666144,0.000023389142,0.0000058588266,0.000013876755,0.00016158317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972014,0.0010187958,0.0004162526,0.00024508065,0.00073068915,0.00038777586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965297,0.0025424596,0.00010312692,0.00015525268,0.0005311603,0.00013828522],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014921381,0.00014827216,0.00023980912,0.000030114905,0.0025229973,0.00007985648,0.0002198779,0.00014789493,0.00018155744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014732945,0.00012290571,0.00020197938,0.00028244813,0.0022135305,0.00043563315,0.00005625941,0.00032283133,0.00006887206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011377354,0.00017047138,0.000018406383,0.0000072210496,0.000028350198,0.0000032010541,0.009180161,6.296759e-7,0.0002484637,0.98853534,0.00062888704,0.0010650754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022728769,0.000042022697,0.00013509126,0.000012226493,0.00003694902,8.7009727e-7,0.0016358015,0.000011537204,0.0007155184,0.9397321,0.0573007,0.00014993182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039644583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065455635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93769556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015857436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050792744","doi":"10.1177/019145370002600202","title":"Broken imperatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Epistemology; Relation (database); Sociology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06960192516767587,"score_gpt":0.2964933800988422,"score_spread":0.2268914549311663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050792744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036805972,0.00042087407,0.0000030152755,0.03084986,0.001046797,0.00018845973,0.00022361214,0.00028168014,0.9301797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96547174,0.000047669084,0.000026320935,0.006857635,0.015702752,0.000038828057,0.000043292897,0.000056058307,0.011755706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819356,0.00013086853,0.00038918958,0.00038891262,0.00040604256,0.0004914423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931145,0.00008359469,0.00005065709,0.00022392083,0.00019650796,0.00013388383],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017370725,0.00029944367,0.00037476333,0.00008110385,0.0016005592,0.00034136508,0.00032072357,0.00013949533,0.014232852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030597672,0.00029886,0.00032122456,0.000048172882,0.001177945,0.00049365597,0.000039952814,0.00042226797,0.0016480197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035273122,0.00012593059,0.0000022443508,0.000046858047,0.000057835692,0.00001729549,0.07033375,2.8353136e-7,0.000081146834,0.92253864,0.004887148,0.0018735818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040882648,0.00006904745,0.000036649075,0.000021352005,0.000048265778,0.0000029909086,0.0009496446,0.0000060795282,0.000053458614,0.7198938,0.2781639,0.00034595764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020957094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000868237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92866576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004399546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004527074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051472268","doi":"10.1177/0191453703029003004","title":"Cultural Paths and Aesthetic Signs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061988530836276055,"score_gpt":0.28259092109738954,"score_spread":0.22060239026111347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051472268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13896184,0.0009768285,0.00000881602,0.005251957,0.0005835022,0.00018782893,0.000038152873,0.00015609538,0.853835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320215,0.000013357549,0.000016908403,0.0024833535,0.0013327242,0.000018183111,0.000007309805,0.000022816359,0.0029032151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990851,0.00010571444,0.00017157018,0.00020588667,0.00015817245,0.00027352202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967575,0.000026304902,0.000033173183,0.00007882925,0.00010299208,0.0000829633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011704236,0.00017717367,0.00019736454,0.000030583476,0.00095691584,0.00018934815,0.00008117299,0.000055776403,0.0008832815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029023317,0.00014494172,0.00010953343,0.000024825082,0.0005570686,0.00024605202,0.000021359725,0.00015827891,0.00015819071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048883926,0.000059066377,0.000004817198,0.000020326179,0.0000098338205,0.000009192326,0.042141613,2.3514529e-8,0.00021149029,0.9547878,0.002300777,0.00045015826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026684962,0.00010576868,0.0000067966807,0.000014062769,0.00003478679,0.000010842762,0.005522056,6.380167e-7,0.0001214865,0.67403245,0.3196442,0.00024006683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000104622795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016161246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014278642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001214078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.13942968570287156,"score_gpt":0.40712796464283746,"score_spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052372972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055162087,0.000109166074,0.00019429544,0.042125158,0.00047468182,0.00048777336,0.00010488395,0.0002194579,0.9011225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316853,0.0000064794085,0.0002704299,0.0021239019,0.004194998,0.000022832162,0.00003993298,0.00002268593,0.00015021136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0005153534,0.00045940687,0.00029351425,0.0007234391,0.000552489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.0003504411,0.00010713569,0.00015654873,0.0003527193,0.00013388153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076805096,0.00016979683,0.00030108393,0.00009721453,0.0007946398,0.000080590515,0.00023963492,0.00032002613,0.00012762063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004284294,0.00019002931,0.00015678733,0.00023005187,0.0018054574,0.00042663465,0.000035435714,0.0003141835,0.00003523512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169319,0.00023102872,0.000037295762,0.000042862222,0.00001134636,0.000008456932,0.008075449,5.969151e-7,0.0003562223,0.9904713,0.00065236114,0.000096152304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027328235,0.00009154494,0.00016380359,0.000015213979,0.00004858609,9.365527e-7,0.0007325259,0.000013695147,0.00033918524,0.9933772,0.0047237473,0.00022028008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004049067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042417969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93800646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009872601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035673528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77491707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052428614","doi":"10.1177/0191453704047011","title":"Habermas’s epistemic conception of democracy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberation; Epistemology; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Democratic theory; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05115656760123635,"score_gpt":0.35306916738062166,"score_spread":0.30191259977938534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052428614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14657427,0.00043050645,0.0009473292,0.16286087,0.0011360976,0.0005924642,0.00011167524,0.00030356622,0.6870432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948408,0.00003519423,0.00022579996,0.0014141424,0.0033043663,0.000017944953,0.000010447661,0.00002507992,0.00012623872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978431,0.00034335372,0.0004522489,0.00029817937,0.0005808159,0.0004823153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894285,0.00029598406,0.00010331182,0.00017347868,0.00028378735,0.00020057545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006477482,0.00018604076,0.00036767448,0.00008230077,0.0011479827,0.00004363578,0.00035366364,0.00023231948,0.00036829602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041274782,0.00021345593,0.00029432971,0.0003641127,0.0018760614,0.00036943276,0.000051825224,0.00028480354,0.0001459263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000356496,0.00016590052,0.000055827226,0.000059223625,0.000018522764,0.0000101903115,0.009037408,0.0000023952794,0.0012506975,0.98860514,0.00005563215,0.0007034373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000605734,0.00006378483,0.000119311284,0.00006254475,0.000046105346,0.0000015514461,0.0009832206,5.1340555e-7,0.0008724887,0.9926967,0.004316121,0.00023190408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023591123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002057622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84826654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001701263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014440384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8829471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052702763","doi":"10.1177/0191453714564459","title":"Two concepts of pluralism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Pluralism (philosophy); Value pluralism; Epistemology; Humanity; Relativism; Sociology; Politics; Morality; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.045098649591847825,"score_gpt":0.28570799424270965,"score_spread":0.2406093446508618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052702763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057552386,0.0001872264,0.000014811589,0.0045487606,0.0015291824,0.00015393623,0.0001322238,0.000109886394,0.9357716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98715454,0.0000015529824,0.000040127456,0.002873462,0.008632758,0.00001594556,0.000020990263,0.000032579697,0.0012280309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874324,0.00013652179,0.00034665945,0.00022146557,0.00027190178,0.00028021255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992863,0.00012036728,0.00011849261,0.00018440056,0.00021128892,0.000079182384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018718628,0.00019343443,0.00034909326,0.0000925021,0.0006569865,0.00004453615,0.00024359266,0.0000661055,0.0019461536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036909285,0.00019906809,0.00023635206,0.000039130853,0.0010294943,0.00021145577,0.000034883025,0.00019842092,0.00023439138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001828962,0.0000620188,0.0000070563606,0.000058695925,0.000022787743,0.0000028467434,0.067135505,2.8827273e-7,0.000106769345,0.93060005,0.0015861423,0.00039952708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051573705,0.0000917145,0.000017577426,0.000025077708,0.00003844609,0.0000010886587,0.00029081607,0.0000042297584,0.00018560684,0.65165716,0.3469417,0.00023083332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009932141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032005722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93454355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032901586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024299181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053881670","doi":"10.1177/0191453714554025","title":"Modernity and postcolonial nationhood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Vision; Civilization; Subject (documents); China; Aesthetics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Anthropology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.03199838893604897,"score_gpt":0.2286683472268729,"score_spread":0.19666995829082393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053881670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15880482,0.00014568555,0.000050878363,0.018630879,0.0012365438,0.00021359617,0.0001326533,0.0001917522,0.8205932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874927,0.0000018559368,0.000030650364,0.003771928,0.007905336,0.000019606403,0.000017599883,0.000026198,0.0007341681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990154,0.000107837615,0.00019692951,0.00023232971,0.00021040889,0.00023710073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999526,0.00008692381,0.000053294287,0.00010626848,0.00014128095,0.00008620307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001762802,0.00016688753,0.00020775173,0.00008210269,0.0014613402,0.00012314857,0.00012531919,0.000080521604,0.0005531662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004816903,0.00017791016,0.00009585621,0.000023374796,0.0005172672,0.00026562164,0.000036940615,0.00021035882,0.00015211085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019439174,0.000060743023,0.000011517106,0.000043007774,0.000015435628,0.0000023226667,0.049566146,1.3736755e-7,0.000021243713,0.9489465,0.0006532777,0.0006602314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034631364,0.00009232492,0.0001275211,0.000008427005,0.000030922016,0.0000022255902,0.00010117022,0.000032591994,0.000014422271,0.78327847,0.21574704,0.00021857141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049677576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061442646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82868785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038104477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002117916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054616461","doi":"10.1177/0191453708102092","title":"Transcendence in Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendence (philosophy); Consciousness; Philosophy; Hegelianism; Relation (database); Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03891065556431563,"score_gpt":0.263735967062629,"score_spread":0.22482531149831333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054616461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36713073,0.0008833729,0.000017923772,0.061897967,0.00038346116,0.00036382253,0.00015002127,0.00016269844,0.56901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833081,0.000009853915,0.000009891656,0.010436426,0.0027963633,0.00002300896,0.000009618805,0.000021709893,0.003385064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856806,0.000115608105,0.00030533233,0.00025763692,0.00026705817,0.00048627768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999511,0.00013320461,0.000039568764,0.00017864561,0.000065710345,0.00007189355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026027055,0.00021156669,0.0002738345,0.00007675277,0.0006801587,0.00017267588,0.0003108524,0.000093511844,0.0014194086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002328252,0.00017671741,0.00018420912,0.00007469992,0.00037626366,0.00022778724,0.000014664558,0.00041723027,0.00007588678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035113684,0.00023544274,0.00009399097,0.000033457618,0.000019920255,0.00006806656,0.11737346,0.0000017981761,0.00030769565,0.8740899,0.0053048427,0.0024363399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007420838,0.00013460557,0.00308384,0.00003157792,0.00003678146,0.000005404144,0.0071451664,0.000046129822,0.00035820916,0.9097513,0.078266494,0.00039842282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011042583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009848195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6161773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006138687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004502791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055802676","doi":"10.1177/0191453713518321","title":"Exception, decision and philosophic politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Closure (psychology); Relation (database); Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04720017467913116,"score_gpt":0.26084934130257104,"score_spread":0.21364916662343988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055802676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2535295,0.0019229265,0.0037057893,0.059454434,0.0033992466,0.0006463243,0.0001676547,0.0006485457,0.6765256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98438555,0.000021325057,0.000099392746,0.0041886903,0.010750856,0.000019512785,0.0000174344,0.00003658937,0.00048066795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986721,0.000080697515,0.00031977103,0.00030018666,0.00031279467,0.00031441593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999213,0.0002215036,0.00007018014,0.00016307966,0.00024282375,0.0000894433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017423845,0.00021024956,0.00027288872,0.000106989624,0.0013319139,0.00017462461,0.00013225387,0.00006606398,0.0003902653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010817876,0.00021178566,0.00009124506,0.00004071094,0.0006013657,0.00025664252,0.00010864589,0.0001616585,0.00014589266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007750426,0.000046000052,0.000054621047,0.000041315045,0.000017059187,0.0000011598183,0.010523853,2.927703e-7,0.000014684191,0.9817867,0.0037804751,0.0037260775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037805256,0.000072597744,0.0015072136,0.000027849608,0.000039770774,0.0000019839847,0.00022569114,0.00007099695,0.000006464447,0.8643405,0.1331044,0.00022451408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023413391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020714178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73085606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042831867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009347139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061155933","doi":"10.1177/0191453711435656","title":"Interculturalism or multiculturalism?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interculturalism; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07601911330523115,"score_gpt":0.3331997025824541,"score_spread":0.257180589277223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061155933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11449672,0.0019167364,0.000013491423,0.09945006,0.0066248486,0.0006690146,0.00016129648,0.0005780576,0.7760898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747981,0.00007607289,0.00008845276,0.0030330874,0.0072937617,0.000028300254,0.000010971728,0.000017747745,0.014653543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837637,0.00018727266,0.00021393978,0.00017368654,0.00041028028,0.0006384373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.000078051686,0.000055784716,0.00009995626,0.00015499556,0.00037330578],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003002979,0.00013250315,0.00020462857,0.00015191003,0.0026458295,0.00035396306,0.00027333922,0.0001738991,0.0025652698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028855028,0.00013559542,0.00018546658,0.0002872475,0.0010346255,0.00083869655,0.00004239286,0.00021889448,0.0006732003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002067728,0.00012111705,0.00004605474,0.000036240766,0.00003237901,0.000016124408,0.28000218,3.6997434e-8,0.00016711334,0.64924407,0.06819879,0.0021152385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020573936,0.000010967219,0.0009045785,0.000015736856,0.000041968135,0.0000033198064,0.008832115,2.8063508e-7,0.000010914897,0.0071693812,0.98253906,0.00026592467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073048525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12543249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91434026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007911905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015335728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075400578","doi":"10.1177/0191453711402940","title":"Cold, cold, warm: Autonomy, intimacy and maturity in Adorno","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronomy; Autonomy; Maturity (psychological); Context (archaeology); Dialectic; Epistemology; Duty; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.08404735499115382,"score_gpt":0.32801068945712863,"score_spread":0.24396333446597482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075400578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1561875,0.00059857516,0.000049297316,0.019605108,0.00075714046,0.00075510854,0.000083353596,0.00028387856,0.82168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955415,0.000048721897,0.0003459191,0.002198301,0.0015534279,0.00006808559,0.0000035007795,0.00003252402,0.00020802753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740016,0.0005635377,0.00043401815,0.0004892685,0.0003997669,0.0007132412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892807,0.00033762294,0.00006352323,0.00019553116,0.0001476084,0.00032762872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010589175,0.00026490798,0.0004416442,0.00014360595,0.0009817844,0.00010544562,0.00039572467,0.00031114975,0.0006491594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032552175,0.00030847488,0.00016068593,0.00042356565,0.00168894,0.00049597106,0.00015026833,0.00053492544,0.00012204168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066548964,0.00027983324,0.00094565545,0.0000563074,0.000015578675,0.000052446336,0.023307968,2.181039e-8,0.00013139925,0.97447056,0.000112018366,0.00056163693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057300256,0.00006219414,0.0015947967,0.00004219016,0.000037161626,0.0000014911589,0.0009562288,0.0000030583453,0.00028403642,0.96729773,0.02875897,0.00038911746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008931753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106911364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.839354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017934496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016323879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075716435","doi":"10.1177/0191453709106243","title":"Organizing nature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Normative; Epistemology; Relation (database); Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Key (lock); Scientific revolution; Ecology; History; Biology","score_opus":0.06701404789200402,"score_gpt":0.2945314178431706,"score_spread":0.2275173699511666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075716435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022236422,0.0089424625,0.000015401962,0.17731494,0.0047084573,0.0003552386,0.000052964304,0.0005857546,0.78578836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647808,0.00014145697,0.000031125455,0.011540347,0.0182667,0.000008795416,0.000010333472,0.000023369339,0.005197046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863833,0.000050728588,0.00023636784,0.00035600463,0.00032440008,0.0003941554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994033,0.000034081382,0.00005620595,0.00014550066,0.00026224577,0.00009864352],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014688358,0.00019387102,0.00028376706,0.00004497088,0.002375882,0.000085331354,0.00015574391,0.00015225662,0.0005317785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006612847,0.00018626083,0.00016888663,0.00008887487,0.00026748516,0.00015485016,0.000022832051,0.00049107696,0.00012445262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007843008,0.000116340525,0.0000050239023,0.000047468497,0.000022556398,0.0000054142747,0.09830455,2.957727e-8,0.000045191035,0.8702676,0.029254919,0.0019230149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018862337,0.000117804215,0.00019575973,0.000010080128,0.00003397332,0.000001835521,0.008526996,5.6116147e-7,0.000033932545,0.3115866,0.6790265,0.0002773419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050457646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004466804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001818011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003068557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079963562","doi":"10.1177/0191453714530983","title":"The event of absolute freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Absolute (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Rationality","score_opus":0.026345918131393996,"score_gpt":0.31529215809124445,"score_spread":0.28894623995985047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079963562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009713821,0.00016816192,0.00047512696,0.081181034,0.0009964993,0.00019261525,0.000018682427,0.00007089835,0.9071832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493665,0.000030399002,0.00005077876,0.0012602976,0.0029165337,0.000019850295,0.0000010673075,0.00001011175,0.0007742922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.0002684152,0.00028531108,0.00015231274,0.0002926266,0.00046799608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.0006606364,0.0000736351,0.00014856811,0.00012098532,0.00014072997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010088773,0.00009437047,0.00019174196,0.000023284478,0.0013483829,0.000048095993,0.00037904628,0.0001068408,0.000094583964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067731825,0.00008081177,0.00018470357,0.00009932002,0.0013637838,0.00011890074,0.0000612968,0.00015031513,0.00007673347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054112784,0.000033111628,0.000011760497,0.000009043893,0.000012717203,3.936562e-7,0.001928031,2.903903e-7,0.000012809227,0.99336636,0.0009945569,0.0036255426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013234059,0.000022572805,0.000655171,0.000006767253,0.000014735101,1.1755931e-7,0.0003494593,0.000015280864,0.000020709856,0.74865645,0.25004268,0.00008370802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080707105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028364817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058369493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009248326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082046860","doi":"10.1177/0191453711421602","title":"Revenge and Nostalgia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Action (physics); Aesthetics; Gesture; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14358697015767136,"score_gpt":0.2834361484758875,"score_spread":0.13984917831821614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082046860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024087822,0.00064919225,0.000009081549,0.009609225,0.0014815116,0.00019467503,0.00017389817,0.00020347205,0.9635911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960835,0.000033786753,0.00007151043,0.0031553234,0.005707838,0.000023224038,0.00001534181,0.00004637657,0.0013382285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865913,0.00008253198,0.00030575405,0.00032681314,0.00025741174,0.0003683685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937856,0.00005299642,0.00007036869,0.0001812952,0.00018520812,0.00013157104],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020364711,0.00023527679,0.0003015213,0.000086051696,0.0009502572,0.00012624572,0.00019891486,0.00012746202,0.0012260147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047864054,0.0002398297,0.00016146865,0.000030983443,0.001130098,0.0003524866,0.00009575803,0.00033914577,0.00021631154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023542661,0.00008834092,0.000009278864,0.000095066884,0.000038724327,0.000022338565,0.10347457,1.6254115e-9,0.000042863743,0.8944577,0.0014019264,0.00034563532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033782856,0.000088684814,0.0002235518,0.00003194283,0.00007488421,0.000004787591,0.0015677706,0.0000013057326,0.0000570654,0.9519673,0.045323953,0.0003209396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030095017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093416194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96552056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002247175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002470492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084980694","doi":"10.1177/0191453706061091","title":"Rawls as a critical theorist","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Function (biology); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04972604115441981,"score_gpt":0.383333714463044,"score_spread":0.3336076733086242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084980694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035477087,0.00022848282,0.00013420121,0.18764058,0.0007821373,0.00019150042,0.000056797056,0.000324665,0.8070939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752172,0.0000129416,0.00015295416,0.008457944,0.014273413,0.00004347288,0.000012024294,0.000042129417,0.0017879099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620545,0.0006194408,0.00046336625,0.00047042957,0.0010691233,0.0011721947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976032,0.0013559817,0.000052130716,0.00022969977,0.0003796939,0.00037931636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010275455,0.00027785834,0.00038736206,0.000098765486,0.0028511481,0.00024372876,0.00050960114,0.00049022754,0.0010902069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022078063,0.00030664745,0.00034879055,0.0003904411,0.0038741536,0.0004295074,0.00009048883,0.0007027918,0.001337721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023788803,0.00023032803,0.000028928984,0.000037074533,0.000011388838,0.000056243392,0.0028617966,1.09856344e-7,0.00006279338,0.99331796,0.0031957524,0.00017380738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025549458,0.000046095833,0.00016262913,0.000023120483,0.00004910934,0.0000030127917,0.00048459048,0.0000019614179,0.0000904553,0.92831326,0.07021435,0.00035593766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032337073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001235756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020370477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088257101","doi":"10.1177/0191453707081675","title":"Critical theory and the traps of conspiracy thinking","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Alienation; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.031337913739424156,"score_gpt":0.33745725443412233,"score_spread":0.30611934069469815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088257101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10016043,0.0017964813,0.0011477642,0.09580711,0.0005462374,0.0003430362,0.000015237528,0.00009544525,0.8000882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739313,0.0001494949,0.000079304,0.0012463416,0.0009546043,0.0000010265904,5.5346754e-7,0.000008041039,0.00016751356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865204,0.0002958483,0.00019102935,0.00014110829,0.00040052275,0.0003194213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979819,0.0016414135,0.000047635225,0.00007885881,0.00016012018,0.00009005663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031602972,0.00009083995,0.00020975602,0.000051026807,0.0015641317,0.000039888706,0.00024229211,0.00013837179,0.00006636072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053358346,0.0000628308,0.00013920644,0.00012843341,0.0045049633,0.00019439893,0.00006545817,0.00022193395,0.00000348363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009602718,0.000038450584,0.00002221815,0.000022916674,0.000018855819,0.000007994887,0.07745924,1.0107282e-8,0.000015812257,0.9184791,0.000021286463,0.0038180905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005816565,0.000024025725,0.00040855195,0.000018550469,0.000048688198,0.0000012006614,0.03479869,4.870143e-7,0.000029806672,0.9576659,0.0063306396,0.00009176197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026726708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013765336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033863504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051958417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088983715","doi":"10.1177/0191453703294001","title":"Mourning the Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Legitimacy; Appeal; Law; Politics; Virtue; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.07827690784397945,"score_gpt":0.364817615937226,"score_spread":0.28654070809324655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088983715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003368991,0.00041998166,0.00006019582,0.0930147,0.0011293024,0.00015842794,0.0000066500183,0.00012396055,0.9017178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863502,0.000048069644,0.00010080532,0.009372909,0.0024175327,0.000018961786,0.0000014910993,0.00002270014,0.0016673423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977525,0.00063982623,0.00021179332,0.00021919861,0.000628746,0.0005479615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990448,0.00042344787,0.000057832105,0.00015618466,0.00019044301,0.00012730813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012769311,0.00014137,0.00017553728,0.000026117978,0.0040530274,0.00017608498,0.0003514272,0.00020810688,0.00033561117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007223699,0.00012107182,0.00017665811,0.00024364183,0.0014970572,0.00022185508,0.00002958666,0.0005353332,0.00020764324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027164815,0.00003335053,0.000026904792,0.0000077994,0.000011739499,0.000005442253,0.049509976,4.600592e-7,0.000019767129,0.94839966,0.0018410294,0.00014113422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010462102,0.000009944712,0.000033131826,0.0000073039373,0.000017955585,8.0871285e-7,0.0068443576,7.7674997e-7,0.000034886085,0.60310113,0.38972247,0.00012258385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008973074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006648076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008580005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016488145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095816048","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700603","title":"Derrida and the promise of community","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Interpretation (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Constitution; Sociology; Horizon; Law; Linguistics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0759156014586603,"score_gpt":0.2805219420148454,"score_spread":0.20460634055618512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095816048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71194136,0.00015440467,0.0000019573465,0.012585388,0.0001475855,0.00017258663,0.000027399947,0.000020709393,0.2749486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974289,0.000029253486,0.0000021274911,0.0010261333,0.0007116217,0.000016163403,0.0000026822654,0.00000943849,0.0007737003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992279,0.00026368958,0.00018334587,0.00005949851,0.00013534776,0.00013025926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.00015470354,0.000053766813,0.00011266241,0.00014522191,0.00003083776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003588144,0.00008804854,0.0001934288,0.00002560316,0.0012201471,0.00007932849,0.00013827698,0.00002802281,0.0003685386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006080173,0.00006326734,0.000082771614,0.000027052682,0.0015064973,0.000105796295,0.00006847886,0.00021756909,0.000009471964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042064723,0.00008753717,0.00008416861,0.000035032404,0.000027969289,0.0000014056154,0.036929023,2.4255451e-8,0.000034015935,0.9614734,0.000722461,0.00056287926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010126849,0.000046179444,0.001723684,0.0000126865725,0.000049046295,0.0000017090517,0.0030818447,0.000007430062,0.000050991915,0.96457356,0.029338881,0.00010130502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084209925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012636445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2854875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000104071605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147269875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9384509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099297109","doi":"10.1177/0191453706066976","title":"Constitutional patriotism as a model of postnational political association","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Constitution; Democratic deficit; Political science; Law; Globalization; European union; Patriotism; Negotiation; Doctrine; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.02790051360940355,"score_gpt":0.3145000514571126,"score_spread":0.28659953784770903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099297109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12997514,0.000024157156,0.00064269354,0.026229642,0.00038832147,0.0001800687,0.000339986,0.00007409464,0.8421459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169445,9.0851523e-7,0.000271126,0.0009647475,0.0028793095,0.000012818283,0.00006861827,0.0000072825187,0.0041007646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977302,0.00012014698,0.000354656,0.00019444551,0.0012089127,0.00039164338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986785,0.0002474898,0.00013126453,0.000053179014,0.0008027713,0.00008679613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039044127,0.00011444073,0.00018898671,0.000072553885,0.00090584654,0.00005600518,0.00019056699,0.0001982835,0.00044268207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021587928,0.00012829051,0.00019131845,0.00007943146,0.0009697613,0.000261191,0.000025349751,0.00016137736,0.000090257694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011246128,0.00015853399,0.00020302404,0.0000075207663,0.000022132524,0.0000033462948,0.0004484226,0.000016964043,0.0001245956,0.99851,0.0004836533,0.000010546442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003191034,0.000015116471,0.0010151325,0.000010618478,0.000028518407,8.6545805e-7,0.00003621326,0.00013125935,0.00013328971,0.9957211,0.00244739,0.00014136422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015919852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001841352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059842656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052266545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100431627","doi":"10.1177/0191453706066977","title":"Adorno’s critical materialism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Epistemology; Humanity; Reductionism; Philosophy; Dialectic; Marxist philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Historical materialism; Character (mathematics); Law; History; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.03960191063407867,"score_gpt":0.35841473000573626,"score_spread":0.3188128193716576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100431627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014723417,0.00025748828,0.0002503119,0.10952763,0.002214898,0.00029920854,0.0001597313,0.00052415323,0.87204313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774328,0.000008700662,0.0002617237,0.0031644008,0.01825872,0.000054584325,0.000025538675,0.00005200552,0.0007415524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650705,0.00069327967,0.00050907134,0.000501861,0.0008021435,0.0009865826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847,0.00064730394,0.000048103153,0.00023716185,0.00031022122,0.0002871885],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086559873,0.00029892524,0.00042423044,0.00011016167,0.0024017498,0.00032650624,0.00048639058,0.00036246743,0.0022481827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006362995,0.00034087015,0.00032341204,0.00036834148,0.0023679684,0.00047655337,0.00009320927,0.00035411492,0.00063618243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044326716,0.00023594065,0.00002702032,0.000049862105,0.000009652731,0.000060467468,0.0015746998,1.5869676e-7,0.00051609596,0.99438685,0.0028315294,0.00026341664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026891797,0.00003366899,0.00013102555,0.000023412738,0.00004559056,0.0000030281994,0.0003146225,0.0000011423165,0.00023619305,0.85960275,0.13896668,0.00037297417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007168996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003885408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96270937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013441959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008927826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104433519","doi":"10.1177/0191453714559536","title":"Democracy and critique","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Epistemology; Critical theory; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10109650115837754,"score_gpt":0.39114222723940306,"score_spread":0.2900457260810255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104433519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020604642,0.00054131413,0.00023981041,0.2114371,0.00085483957,0.0002692631,0.000032361397,0.00026876497,0.7657519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814994,0.00003644755,0.0002321844,0.007177761,0.003836903,0.000021978758,0.0000048543097,0.000027871196,0.00051205093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997762,0.0005683352,0.00026509215,0.0003408064,0.00052534585,0.0005383717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983416,0.0005656668,0.000034422595,0.00013990089,0.00032676445,0.0005916209],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011258129,0.00019029643,0.0002893674,0.0000745138,0.0015379303,0.00015939891,0.00025802277,0.00021954575,0.00016290652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016181879,0.00021458292,0.00011814915,0.0002606878,0.0014130577,0.0004701712,0.00008965457,0.00031917062,0.00013290807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031852374,0.00007896717,0.00015801842,0.000022408027,0.000011133043,0.000029422272,0.009915502,5.6134727e-8,0.000020509591,0.9866448,0.0022107658,0.0008765403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034275764,0.00004978564,0.0000664517,0.000015631796,0.000027584152,0.0000029113776,0.0018807775,0.0000020458012,0.000029216106,0.9004504,0.096884295,0.00024812657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016887042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019380754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96754533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008424494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012646825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106259977","doi":"10.1177/0191453704047009","title":"Jacques Derrida and Alain Badiou","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Undecidable problem; Philosophy; Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Decidability; Computer science","score_opus":0.03865066628342164,"score_gpt":0.34180472137704926,"score_spread":0.30315405509362764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106259977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15372036,0.004394465,0.00045902486,0.05212375,0.0019914422,0.0004028563,0.00021428928,0.00037766242,0.78631616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375887,0.00004862679,0.00026082664,0.010330986,0.004950759,0.000055617948,0.000027504393,0.00006994159,0.00049686345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977015,0.00017662845,0.00047189282,0.00058948854,0.00033036974,0.00073012017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899447,0.00013447742,0.00009466832,0.00039639144,0.0001275994,0.00025240384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023332104,0.0003651173,0.00051130564,0.00019945859,0.00049605884,0.00008324757,0.00030018383,0.00029524267,0.00054867566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055762932,0.00039826208,0.00028031008,0.00027269102,0.00055241433,0.00016640892,0.000063064464,0.00039329962,0.0004624954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039205457,0.00026739258,0.0004099874,0.00004342859,0.00024827954,0.000085410255,0.005514877,6.441234e-7,0.0000948362,0.9898509,0.0026927881,0.00075226865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014323709,0.00013015665,0.0052211965,0.000027357839,0.00021362549,0.00004251058,0.00036969196,0.000001352585,0.0000819407,0.9765546,0.015458434,0.00046677992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032153507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028271621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010190933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005027947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114681443","doi":"10.1177/0191453705050605","title":"Woman’s eclipse","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Subject (documents); Metaphysics; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Subjectivity; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08812732688369972,"score_gpt":0.3012722547853371,"score_spread":0.21314492790163736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114681443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011992233,0.0004304479,0.000007884068,0.097988926,0.002472658,0.00019625777,0.00016735536,0.00032379612,0.8864204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89710283,0.000018622806,0.000062967454,0.015549483,0.08224882,0.000041397125,0.00003429366,0.00006321719,0.004878335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792904,0.000102393235,0.00046655978,0.00041658944,0.00049996923,0.00058546924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990933,0.00009052205,0.00009671053,0.00028223678,0.0002685734,0.00016869056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025507723,0.000322852,0.00039310308,0.00013110031,0.0014262978,0.00030929502,0.00038908815,0.0001653353,0.003917675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062355306,0.00033665364,0.00036959784,0.000048633286,0.0009770356,0.00057369546,0.00009674833,0.0005055077,0.0021509859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002297831,0.00017493192,0.0000026174137,0.00005674124,0.000051063707,0.000014552027,0.05026243,4.2009694e-7,0.000034951536,0.9196972,0.028678121,0.0010039884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034621044,0.000036301095,0.000015352225,0.000016886768,0.000048295744,0.0000027827232,0.0007120496,0.000008487158,0.000033273212,0.53810936,0.46038172,0.00028928244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105006475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023528647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8851106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095613526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005054375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116190275","doi":"10.1177/0191453704041242","title":"The Ties to Bind","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Realm; Autonomy; Democratization; Conscience; Deliberation; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Public reason; Epistemology; Law and economics; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11181541880779734,"score_gpt":0.3590977571688237,"score_spread":0.24728233836102637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116190275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18037811,0.000059090224,0.0016744762,0.70251536,0.002989312,0.000883236,0.00010174792,0.00045636055,0.11094232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638109,0.000013592089,0.000099734636,0.03405928,0.0012823788,0.00007651951,0.0000012414204,0.000028470202,0.000627879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810874,0.00009259589,0.000323924,0.00037960702,0.0006346006,0.00046050551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903816,0.00040703683,0.00005930563,0.0002547625,0.00011789203,0.00012281635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023254813,0.00016059309,0.00014297487,0.00009028842,0.001732279,0.00015607699,0.00053955463,0.00008024885,0.00006136294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017456195,0.0001341155,0.000082801474,0.0006277419,0.0010634261,0.0001436856,0.00016494743,0.00043206094,0.0006353861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009233305,0.00007756928,8.718895e-7,0.000009949464,0.0000030830843,0.000013552883,0.0010780076,0.0000010759926,0.086054236,0.91088897,0.001265236,0.0005982408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027188333,0.00008610686,0.00008643031,0.000014996773,0.0000071884665,0.000002829359,0.00008182981,8.7575256e-7,0.09207837,0.8787649,0.028441923,0.00016261298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010773144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008820836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7834328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009672035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000805287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117389719","doi":"10.1177/0191453708089194","title":"Homo spectator","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; Ethos; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Aesthetics; Solidarity; Public space; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.08545753693333462,"score_gpt":0.24273541105741167,"score_spread":0.15727787412407707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117389719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098748446,0.0004934351,0.000013712103,0.010580624,0.0011319108,0.00013549937,0.000058930178,0.0002682801,0.8885692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97687584,0.00004425794,0.000057449284,0.0021259857,0.010407966,0.000023672188,0.000013653117,0.00003802243,0.01041315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988414,0.000038101938,0.00022285045,0.00022819983,0.0003141208,0.00035531542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960756,0.00003577383,0.000039320374,0.00013795738,0.00008916135,0.00009023092],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000055391443,0.00018129068,0.00023397795,0.000061306404,0.001405402,0.00007674635,0.00018576937,0.00005269705,0.002556783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015085259,0.00017034872,0.00018566285,0.000041742765,0.00053915323,0.0002598664,0.000040417643,0.00016685006,0.0010778492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012269078,0.00012654881,0.000035806384,0.000021900505,0.00002822613,0.00008536919,0.037566215,4.6627825e-8,0.000047887217,0.9230379,0.03886739,0.00017047519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048513451,0.00008084999,0.00033924702,0.000013440955,0.00003911209,0.000016248441,0.0016252134,0.0000034791499,0.0002164692,0.39444745,0.60233504,0.0003983344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000419161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017468403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.878156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004225632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002574902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121185233","doi":"10.1177/01914537030295002","title":"Poststructuralism, Behaviorism and the Problem of Hate Speech","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Behaviorism; Epistemology; Quine; Relativism; Philosophy; Watson; Problematization; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013587615433783054,"score_gpt":0.2417995353784794,"score_spread":0.22821191994469633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121185233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8677152,0.0013662261,0.012263617,0.03947635,0.0014768371,0.0015540606,0.000025331852,0.00046838706,0.07565401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914093,0.000014527909,0.007838918,0.00046781555,0.00016283625,0.000017659333,8.2959184e-7,0.000011143099,0.000076984674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872845,0.00019277068,0.00025763214,0.0002655564,0.0003009439,0.00025462604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994158,0.00007478377,0.00008918347,0.00022204124,0.00013679557,0.000061394916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039388923,0.00013884806,0.00022633764,0.000054258344,0.0003557129,0.00010480842,0.0003354426,0.00008649138,0.000010925426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003133847,0.000109359375,0.000109659326,0.00025061125,0.00034483234,0.00025856562,0.00008080916,0.00019846433,0.000008629462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010827868,0.000020513226,0.000018818455,0.00002347044,0.0000131995885,0.000010039967,0.0019524508,2.2434787e-7,0.0012358286,0.9814396,0.00004871012,0.015226331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010513493,0.000065702436,0.00056024274,0.000016396962,0.000029718229,0.00008057061,0.00007611977,0.00003840997,0.016616838,0.97985464,0.001419177,0.00019085793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008061345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000305522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1236941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019504801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002851858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44595456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132958919","doi":"10.1177/0191453708102095","title":"Ultimate referentiality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Praxis; Foundationalism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Metaphysics; Positivism; Sociological theory; Summons; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07843065238579255,"score_gpt":0.39738031384661354,"score_spread":0.318949661460821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132958919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013218907,0.0001408018,0.00019285826,0.10746199,0.0005893209,0.0002547748,0.00005180854,0.0003991177,0.87769043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879547,0.000023528903,0.00018793599,0.006190922,0.005195448,0.000011538158,0.000014314056,0.000017299122,0.00040430966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974007,0.00053967256,0.00035689023,0.00038748156,0.00062568096,0.0006895571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896455,0.00024592935,0.00005481472,0.00021806706,0.00021841358,0.0002982226],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008514479,0.0002182803,0.0003366512,0.00007258917,0.0019301026,0.00016071474,0.00043184668,0.00024017131,0.0010041135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044676542,0.00024185373,0.00028718743,0.00034879358,0.00075433357,0.00037419953,0.00003692817,0.0003616081,0.0003356814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004539891,0.0002003249,0.000010183944,0.00001388409,0.000011528643,0.000014494592,0.0040164073,1.0441857e-7,0.00021210092,0.99115264,0.0005422088,0.0037807291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027138746,0.000056711964,0.00038883527,0.000016254258,0.000035730944,7.768024e-7,0.00030523996,0.0000016357048,0.000110437184,0.9414012,0.057125565,0.00028622543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084929685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010203456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009941023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060194565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139642768","doi":"10.1177/0191453714545340","title":"Rebooting discourse ethics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universalization; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Subject (documents); Transcendental number; Reboot; Normative ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11246661663897314,"score_gpt":0.43020216607083034,"score_spread":0.3177355494318572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139642768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075644613,0.0000739372,0.0011032027,0.17097202,0.0009160748,0.00020246899,0.00002078684,0.00030422368,0.8188428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804258,0.000013316189,0.0002363497,0.007635518,0.011123552,0.000023028731,0.000007189114,0.000040031548,0.0004952374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996149,0.0015063272,0.0003598862,0.00041156696,0.0008404597,0.0007327313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724686,0.0018636738,0.00007026011,0.00023281906,0.00026803729,0.00031832562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196073,0.000226131,0.00033973064,0.00007702511,0.0034167666,0.00017240635,0.00048584992,0.0003964471,0.00040155734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035803446,0.0002491423,0.00027653726,0.00031526355,0.0019576452,0.00033303152,0.0000926561,0.0009898167,0.00030245454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016904725,0.00008647531,0.000033258355,0.000042934265,0.000012689056,0.000005873725,0.019470487,4.0151048e-7,0.0000687456,0.977476,0.00023611516,0.002550109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021968353,0.000039369334,0.000032127726,0.000039858027,0.000038428396,7.7178083e-7,0.0018204295,0.000008872343,0.000052103234,0.8946974,0.10275057,0.0003003822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014754535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040915886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083651474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010321513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144955472","doi":"10.1177/0191453713498253","title":"A human cry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Acknowledgement; Alienation; Epistemology; Solitude; Philosophy; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05779212550826504,"score_gpt":0.2833906625593409,"score_spread":0.22559853705107588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144955472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110020205,0.00046219374,0.00000427909,0.011484595,0.0007868625,0.00035536234,0.0000411614,0.00025634444,0.876589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97071064,0.000007488859,0.000036716418,0.0043278537,0.0092451265,0.00012673446,0.000017696013,0.000050690374,0.01547708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855137,0.000060154463,0.00032891997,0.0002938213,0.00030667824,0.00045907855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931085,0.00003793561,0.000062683925,0.00019799014,0.00025490936,0.00013560026],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011033148,0.0002357281,0.00030437182,0.000086240085,0.0015473355,0.00048053142,0.00029207882,0.00009265167,0.02062752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002005741,0.00022779734,0.00023005033,0.00003811219,0.00050480256,0.0005927973,0.00007668312,0.00030626316,0.004043618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025077286,0.0001207182,0.000019738574,0.000047988775,0.000029923824,0.0000054994953,0.01856618,1.766072e-8,0.0004328459,0.8886322,0.09168224,0.00046017315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047491977,0.000083299456,0.00064355414,0.000025449826,0.000047733418,0.0000014792097,0.0030933786,0.0000026184316,0.00006881239,0.7580572,0.23708569,0.00041588972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058558414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001458498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86111194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037541125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025121475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145137642","doi":"10.1177/0191453708100232","title":"Clarifying the Foucault—Habermas debate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; CLARITY; Discourse ethics; Political philosophy; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07725484936603297,"score_gpt":0.37796374919171327,"score_spread":0.3007088998256803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145137642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008541625,0.0006786022,0.00010971777,0.38070452,0.0012974532,0.00032338573,0.0000128771035,0.00028279758,0.60804904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720246,0.00015832542,0.00013086059,0.02057743,0.0055829454,0.000017043812,0.0000057078632,0.000024396268,0.0014786947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707186,0.000496712,0.00034865632,0.000349026,0.00090144825,0.00083229557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876064,0.0004149004,0.00009699173,0.00025039,0.00028042143,0.00019664521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011751929,0.00023496915,0.00028360554,0.00006230398,0.0041196747,0.00027019103,0.0006728699,0.00040834476,0.0001718866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062569976,0.00020141315,0.00028812548,0.00041744314,0.0010547347,0.00038373275,0.000052407566,0.0009250647,0.00022231483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001365289,0.00008070305,0.000037939473,0.00001150509,0.000018186482,0.000019747999,0.05292955,7.524344e-7,0.0000792357,0.93657076,0.005846348,0.0043916083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002316807,0.000040528575,0.0008880809,0.00002147733,0.000046452096,0.0000020224188,0.0035624036,0.000007624417,0.00003833532,0.7751855,0.2197056,0.0002702839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005221117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034113778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013937414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022964309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147107385","doi":"10.1177/0191453709103425","title":"`If Adorno isn't the Devil, it's because he's a Jew'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Messianism; Sublime; Depiction; Postmodernism; Secularization; Argument (complex analysis); Hegelianism; Continental philosophy; Eschatology; Epistemology; Judaism; Literature; Theology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.08625256454603723,"score_gpt":0.30670293209469784,"score_spread":0.2204503675486606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147107385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004263936,0.0007865722,0.000017371736,0.37299895,0.002051157,0.0003966619,0.00021063237,0.0003178815,0.61895686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171338,0.000055604825,0.000020853116,0.055796858,0.022818897,0.000041648786,0.000041927542,0.000057803532,0.004032605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971965,0.00022514662,0.0005997281,0.000511851,0.000713448,0.00075333373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985713,0.00020642429,0.00014999739,0.0004857876,0.00040640475,0.00018010214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537152,0.00045204163,0.00050663546,0.00011621474,0.0026459,0.0005828602,0.0007270769,0.00021793129,0.0019598594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013878943,0.00036876844,0.0005317205,0.0001011752,0.0012951319,0.000642442,0.000100544996,0.0008234322,0.0006861562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004009405,0.00020669114,0.0000021788917,0.000047212554,0.000071460774,0.000036217407,0.04707109,3.8208324e-7,0.000045811335,0.90807146,0.043525167,0.0008822543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041970084,0.00012730186,0.00009176004,0.000046682286,0.00015457309,0.000005339264,0.0017953807,0.0000075216863,0.000024680056,0.68271315,0.31422457,0.00038935657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022378047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019268601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007732741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088959685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157416648","doi":"10.1177/0191453709340637","title":"Labour, exchange and recognition: Marx contra Honneth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Personhood; Sociology; Reading (process); Epistemology; Mutual recognition; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.054307754408089125,"score_gpt":0.3159312883741966,"score_spread":0.2616235339661075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157416648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054257087,0.0008856741,0.000070308386,0.1433746,0.0004998738,0.00034397322,0.00012585225,0.00022374708,0.8002189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756621,0.00023670198,0.00014808131,0.018562244,0.0043541198,0.000020791207,0.000009022557,0.000010848657,0.0009960531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984925,0.00019863666,0.00021787318,0.00027846065,0.00022079708,0.0005917655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925506,0.00019150465,0.000044834353,0.00008499002,0.0001205957,0.00030303706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045165053,0.0001503236,0.00025852688,0.0000553986,0.0009865159,0.00012273142,0.00015321455,0.0002003574,0.00066024164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025348208,0.0001734123,0.000097964956,0.00013602655,0.00059273856,0.00035731934,0.000027621534,0.00021769454,0.00011656844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013397906,0.00008465752,0.000012915924,0.00001810866,0.000010123319,0.000015682439,0.004407987,2.8325955e-9,0.000011399375,0.9607945,0.0008988011,0.033732414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051989587,0.00006560971,0.0016889198,0.000015999929,0.00002526921,0.0000018326269,0.0005616466,8.1035506e-7,0.000018231884,0.89585036,0.10103205,0.00021938216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004397027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012616174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007391549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007149887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7587582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160050294","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700101","title":"Adorno, ideology and ideology critique","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Positivism; Epistemology; Dialectic; Rationality; Criticism; Sociology; Identity (music); Critical theory; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04565241091050539,"score_gpt":0.37379883352497034,"score_spread":0.32814642261446497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160050294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07112266,0.0010086411,0.00042968913,0.22107902,0.0010238482,0.00036648446,0.000036382975,0.00032977076,0.7046035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798486,0.00024443262,0.00014748395,0.014407768,0.0046747457,0.000051749994,0.000008078233,0.000035116234,0.000581993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687535,0.00093679386,0.0004093201,0.000537273,0.00036727407,0.00087400276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.0009223657,0.000055828543,0.00020040394,0.00025018863,0.00037373768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095984375,0.00027097034,0.00048009053,0.00013451719,0.001764549,0.000090384005,0.0003720397,0.00046366695,0.0011758965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009910264,0.000311738,0.00018897752,0.0003641436,0.003158516,0.00036951734,0.00013330049,0.00050623936,0.0001762107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005950687,0.0001113473,0.0007053722,0.000028816039,0.000023394005,0.00014918679,0.0046038385,8.6985494e-8,0.00010767776,0.9917459,0.0004795638,0.0019853022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003893327,0.00008712728,0.0005267643,0.000015627684,0.000043568853,0.000025409283,0.0008158057,0.0000022076313,0.000024680703,0.8928165,0.10493549,0.00031749764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034026566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000119378135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007527074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008106313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162597665","doi":"10.1177/0191453713507016","title":"Adorno, Foucault and critique","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Michel foucault; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical theory; Principal (computer security); Philosophy; Critical thought; Ontology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.033145428337997884,"score_gpt":0.3413912186621377,"score_spread":0.3082457903241398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162597665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04323728,0.0004286071,0.00014064636,0.17737786,0.0004987424,0.00057108304,0.00003233682,0.00029064613,0.7774228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857565,0.00006222764,0.00019892238,0.0097859865,0.0034444872,0.00011887011,0.000005343036,0.000033654844,0.0005939673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976804,0.00047866078,0.00031352224,0.0004025661,0.00045933327,0.000665507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830973,0.0007543385,0.000038886203,0.00016582462,0.00032311314,0.00040813038],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054143433,0.00022999085,0.00032318756,0.00008165421,0.0017157922,0.00027313724,0.0002965926,0.0002714289,0.0018240303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008180014,0.00025132237,0.00016561251,0.0002560046,0.0016010486,0.00066192646,0.0000907703,0.00038145413,0.00047989687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000935395,0.00008750183,0.00011392359,0.000042722953,0.000014807872,0.000010365421,0.0054978356,2.2527972e-8,0.000099252735,0.98961985,0.002095383,0.0024089501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024476694,0.00004330419,0.00054637576,0.00002458354,0.000026150965,0.0000019142951,0.0014558606,0.00000277425,0.00004752086,0.9485652,0.048731975,0.0003095915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006267164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000277405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94251925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059685957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005629996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167376493","doi":"10.1177/0191453704045760","title":"Liberalization, modernization, westernization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Westernization; Modernization theory; Liberalization; Political economy; Economic system; Convergence (economics); Political science; Superpower; Economics; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04104186703541473,"score_gpt":0.3237392327435402,"score_spread":0.2826973657081255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167376493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014932912,0.00011582285,0.08551979,0.13444592,0.0008307499,0.00051252526,0.00003789166,0.0006130841,0.7629913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99000347,0.000031468735,0.00032326014,0.0061141145,0.00238559,0.000027136799,0.000035262412,0.000025155116,0.0010545432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863684,0.000117697455,0.0002751189,0.00024448294,0.00030358418,0.00042225802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931335,0.000052080297,0.000059935843,0.00010397063,0.00028679232,0.00018387912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022677345,0.0001286905,0.00016537317,0.000072710514,0.0012778735,0.00013473623,0.00021203955,0.00017069442,0.00026710113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028692727,0.00015700488,0.00008223508,0.00029363777,0.0004135368,0.000620645,0.000035309233,0.00011381709,0.00022317219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029189346,0.00006984824,0.0001267619,0.000012258309,0.000008186532,0.0000023540267,0.008717526,0.00004546922,0.000011825263,0.99043024,0.00024764644,0.000324985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037300718,0.000013138042,0.00051287434,0.000013487282,0.000018090737,5.885373e-7,0.0002904869,0.000012215474,0.00008359163,0.96339756,0.035090286,0.00019469272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050323986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017280309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97507054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022389786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024362204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168205389","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358839","title":"Is a Muslim Gandhi possible?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Secularism; Faith; Democracy; Politics; Terrorism; State (computer science); Muslim world; Law; Political science; Sociology; Civil society; Religious studies; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05103821740833024,"score_gpt":0.26283299312660047,"score_spread":0.2117947757182702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168205389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19645798,0.00007608608,0.0000027397673,0.01708831,0.0035353054,0.00020955225,0.00027891307,0.00022271939,0.7821284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96844745,0.000002361015,0.0000356764,0.010309995,0.01743458,0.00003676051,0.000022868147,0.000057510322,0.0036528115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984635,0.000052299318,0.00032126682,0.0003637429,0.0003368424,0.00046234755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991899,0.00007119229,0.00008222555,0.00027937506,0.00021936305,0.00015793434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017499882,0.00028439684,0.0003052209,0.00015069886,0.0018277923,0.00021352532,0.0003418457,0.00016817488,0.011037188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003008337,0.00029092518,0.00031771488,0.00006335938,0.0008854323,0.00036202424,0.000048422058,0.0006868365,0.0013427389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018513587,0.00011627968,0.000012021157,0.00005469806,0.000029733628,0.00002248225,0.17718041,1.0153942e-8,0.00028224284,0.8139763,0.007867702,0.00043963778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031881576,0.000057011854,0.000046896803,0.000011138779,0.000041222036,0.0000049089435,0.0005577443,0.0000019827166,0.00014790708,0.5892272,0.40925446,0.00033067897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007415769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000132425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7784756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034670564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000630999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168834856","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700504","title":"Politics and the art of suffering in Hölderlin and Nietzsche","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Majesty; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04384813216272519,"score_gpt":0.26744484994901513,"score_spread":0.22359671778628992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168834856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399551,0.003420533,0.000009260848,0.017070979,0.0002735193,0.00030263682,0.00003328543,0.00003830425,0.23889636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958979,0.0004960814,0.000027966571,0.001083854,0.0011784157,0.000017870212,0.000003571742,0.000020135083,0.0012742124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898374,0.00008342916,0.0003075608,0.00017733638,0.00017349508,0.00027440905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949735,0.00020195942,0.000053007,0.00010765618,0.00008177124,0.00005824499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030395912,0.00015022127,0.0003259576,0.000071525006,0.0004127256,0.000115442075,0.000111847265,0.00006212212,0.00021280466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057557638,0.00011843569,0.00007434566,0.000041554074,0.00111571,0.00018358736,0.00007320451,0.0002369497,0.000013584466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044192893,0.000053297004,0.0006738139,0.00007510578,0.000018904611,0.0000071823288,0.034964256,7.4050746e-8,0.000034959412,0.9631189,0.000680745,0.00032857218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033403707,0.0000944932,0.0034645742,0.000103561855,0.00009791471,0.000013358066,0.012321754,0.000062268155,0.000071676164,0.88840026,0.09165355,0.00037620208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032603423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049933663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25594276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001420634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019601599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48296672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275052668","doi":"10.1177/0191453715603092","title":"Labor human rights and human dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Solidarity; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Law; Politics; Political science; Constructive; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15216105046176118,"score_gpt":0.4066183334705921,"score_spread":0.25445728300883097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275052668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1990752,0.000112583155,0.0000064843803,0.040504362,0.0003558787,0.00022297935,0.0000618823,0.00024529314,0.7594153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049056,0.0000015007996,0.000047071993,0.00259281,0.005741034,0.000019787238,0.000012466103,0.000022632817,0.0010721288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737483,0.0004848969,0.00031573774,0.00036843854,0.0007613844,0.00069469836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848425,0.00019333238,0.00006203067,0.0001733592,0.000378497,0.0007085241],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009908517,0.00021894397,0.00033222206,0.00007885973,0.003928549,0.00017036358,0.00033182636,0.0003579842,0.00010615287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032778177,0.00022992902,0.00011630069,0.00023819333,0.0023926918,0.00042023233,0.0001144754,0.00055000937,0.00011821169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006455058,0.000122572,0.00016246944,0.000022459131,0.000015836851,0.000017417304,0.012886256,1.6350176e-8,0.000052024512,0.98496866,0.0017156921,0.000030150653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045267693,0.000077640805,0.0007347728,0.000017105524,0.000041437594,7.6941427e-7,0.00039711027,3.0596297e-7,0.00005456351,0.9504508,0.047483195,0.00028962185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005127509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008297176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79141533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016110159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011957887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317987137","doi":"10.1177/0191453711430934","title":"Review of Gillian Brock, <i>Global Justice</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.04788947998344313,"score_gpt":0.36952831507295486,"score_spread":0.32163883508951174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317987137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065698624,0.094478495,0.00010249774,0.032578867,0.0020610597,0.00060823257,0.00031346874,0.0001880041,0.8630995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673667,0.013838958,0.00019051801,0.015105034,0.0033026452,0.000013813315,0.000020093717,0.000015396827,0.00014686237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783564,0.00027447793,0.00038811727,0.0001851155,0.0006273448,0.0006892824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990371,0.00007986592,0.00013206806,0.00016219846,0.00030650775,0.00028228955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050153024,0.00017262847,0.00038879362,0.000022024813,0.00064100436,0.000025268504,0.00037502075,0.00017439465,0.00015365305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047874544,0.00019153842,0.0002733028,0.0004647118,0.00053101353,0.00038955826,0.00007463687,0.00017873142,0.0001221305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060749658,0.00019802924,0.0005159777,0.0023703175,0.000023111961,0.0000016849145,0.0030322236,5.7329096e-8,0.000012903788,0.96015537,0.03248093,0.0012033281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003445115,0.000050620216,0.00087432144,0.0016439348,0.00053541706,0.000003530538,0.003944495,0.0000016042729,0.000007722376,0.30082715,0.6912272,0.00053952454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005320434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018823084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96079683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017546822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012676262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.781071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325010425","doi":"10.1177/0191453712467751","title":"Civic <i>phronēsis</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Neutrality; Telos; Antinomy; Interpretation (philosophy); Elitism; Maxim; Epistemology; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Primary goods; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Impartiality; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06274147887497468,"score_gpt":0.3402023148223071,"score_spread":0.27746083594733245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325010425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007269051,0.00015075885,0.000048637452,0.19272467,0.0006413967,0.0003427216,0.000022496573,0.00030452662,0.7984957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97217023,0.000030858893,0.00013385295,0.018810693,0.006991551,0.00010101847,0.0000070088176,0.000035536395,0.0017192593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997036,0.00038919036,0.00035666788,0.00037480853,0.0008228824,0.0010204717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984731,0.00042887524,0.000060846865,0.00021743207,0.00034855827,0.00047119387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005472581,0.00023113051,0.0003179793,0.00008255928,0.0020521665,0.00021779479,0.00051515223,0.00038042167,0.0027263183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005577967,0.00025152098,0.00026525953,0.0003637267,0.0017302128,0.0006690676,0.00009472946,0.0005838564,0.0038461953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032050837,0.00009908753,0.000036810943,0.000028458471,0.000017773616,0.000005635694,0.0070614717,6.119333e-8,0.000090419235,0.9821883,0.009623974,0.0008448018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020491815,0.000026306063,0.00042460766,0.00001619064,0.000027193617,6.7635904e-7,0.0007103,0.0000033680435,0.00004824529,0.9243134,0.0739244,0.00030037123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023345235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081274055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96490115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017074346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020797436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331631408","doi":"10.1177/0191453711413715","title":"Basic income, decommodification and the welfare state","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Welfare state; Economics; Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Welfare; Power (physics); Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Law and economics; Market economy; Political science; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07417278495230294,"score_gpt":0.32191681089910273,"score_spread":0.24774402594679978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331631408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10599002,0.0005580061,0.00002821872,0.18025528,0.0006663496,0.0006412722,0.00003842315,0.0002015735,0.71162087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966351,0.00031933805,0.000029545714,0.0012826757,0.0013640235,0.00006758703,0.0000014850024,0.000014259358,0.0002860113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858755,0.0003634587,0.00022496098,0.0001812048,0.00029174722,0.0003510571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994333,0.00016044856,0.00008350751,0.000107138934,0.00013189754,0.000083702354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071350444,0.00012990228,0.00022701483,0.000044072218,0.003935934,0.000057095895,0.0002443675,0.00009816681,0.000041701118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023672909,0.00009240124,0.00011593362,0.00022658429,0.0025241494,0.00019904751,0.000085325715,0.00018801159,0.00002425318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035912653,0.00002566716,0.00028817245,0.000011919133,0.000029810568,0.0000011181322,0.113178335,1.0134098e-8,9.766044e-7,0.8836821,0.00007881782,0.0026671707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055876124,0.000013825855,0.021421866,0.000006761282,0.000037750444,3.350393e-7,0.00901609,0.0000012843697,0.000009596243,0.96600395,0.0027870368,0.0001427334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003722036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007795223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.890645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046849833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000397521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332742111","doi":"10.1177/0191453712461348","title":"Marx, Machiavelli, insurgent democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06366142488186866,"score_gpt":0.3402205865057549,"score_spread":0.2765591616238862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332742111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0371382,0.00045424173,0.00018334322,0.053940985,0.0018175464,0.00026925915,0.000042997104,0.00021684455,0.9059366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831712,0.00005466442,0.00018012492,0.0069428305,0.008157412,0.000034400717,0.000007652751,0.00002608787,0.0014256131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975778,0.000302659,0.0003219227,0.00023188133,0.00037674033,0.001189016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988112,0.00027350947,0.00006210219,0.00014709105,0.000088113426,0.0006179836],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008099811,0.00018722066,0.00028136343,0.00007311381,0.001636746,0.0000747308,0.00029904261,0.00021553374,0.0015305371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026125036,0.00021149206,0.00023510268,0.00018767048,0.0006543424,0.0006091223,0.000092037575,0.00028659,0.00088147185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070008464,0.00017200848,0.0011950174,0.000016966664,0.000019505645,0.0000035536245,0.0064032315,2.6494286e-8,0.000012039298,0.9870904,0.0018809215,0.003199316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017958328,0.000012062375,0.0036027818,0.000007599875,0.000031752075,0.0000011579907,0.0007654436,0.000001260131,0.00005009025,0.6869395,0.30814236,0.00026641716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067215017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041934738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020226698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013859685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346294170","doi":"10.1177/0191453716631166","title":"Towards an ethical politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subjectivity; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Solidarity; Objectivity (philosophy); Political philosophy; Self; Contradiction; Aesthetics; Critical theory; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07917758512145467,"score_gpt":0.396628732648264,"score_spread":0.3174511475268093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346294170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015188227,0.000059519516,0.00069750805,0.33703235,0.0008139342,0.00021403926,0.0001356415,0.00037700968,0.64548177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97609496,0.000024693556,0.00021716821,0.011722324,0.0113371685,0.000027493628,0.000005029918,0.00004156168,0.00052958564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963178,0.0010570842,0.00037402814,0.0004657882,0.00086962205,0.00091566454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.0006844767,0.00004600069,0.0002820915,0.0003515359,0.0006380605],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012955902,0.00024468824,0.00034899494,0.00008739511,0.001877904,0.00012383003,0.000587271,0.00067423325,0.0014175004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013812117,0.00020418612,0.0002690994,0.00026954658,0.002535414,0.00044754404,0.00009099321,0.00055758056,0.00039967263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026137584,0.00014737734,0.00002263329,0.000016367236,0.000015254167,0.000022993177,0.00540673,1.2167705e-8,0.00031947074,0.98914397,0.00036232808,0.0045167017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003477332,0.000092569826,0.00008776059,0.000028946077,0.0000314548,0.0000017310247,0.0004579263,4.773344e-7,0.00020584947,0.8911676,0.107255526,0.00032244134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001669209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023139793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96090674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018318857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002041471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438513800","doi":"10.1177/0191453716651667","title":"‘You be my body for me’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Politics; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Phenomenology (philosophy); Marxist philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06745098632887002,"score_gpt":0.353663852838477,"score_spread":0.286212866509607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2438513800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006768589,0.00008418397,0.0016312464,0.3544885,0.0010321464,0.000516281,0.00025087805,0.00022896704,0.6349992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818484,0.0000236672,0.0001708235,0.0076830266,0.005759911,0.00014165339,0.0000042326524,0.00002416035,0.004344088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824363,0.0001253061,0.00026781225,0.00031904716,0.00025956638,0.00078465324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.0006277948,0.0000508188,0.00013590268,0.00016060917,0.00028483153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054858683,0.00015330673,0.00026479055,0.000050396466,0.0011298443,0.0000642624,0.00032620376,0.00020604412,0.00051939907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083597604,0.00013247911,0.0002621886,0.00009139334,0.00091186154,0.00037343742,0.00005307381,0.00009374331,0.00014973975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015368869,0.000058739344,0.000018910974,0.000014933903,0.000019215659,0.000002111244,0.0017015389,3.0478104e-9,0.00020831186,0.99034166,0.0039025857,0.0037166222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037233921,0.000030698593,0.00008036767,0.000009868278,0.000022142473,2.026661e-7,0.00026510662,5.1690876e-7,0.00017127664,0.62174624,0.37714735,0.00015388259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020637256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006743815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97507983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016944033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001836128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8689964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528452931","doi":"10.1177/0191453715593595","title":"Jacques Derrida on the secular as theologico-political","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15367345580645242,"score_gpt":0.40490127408037974,"score_spread":0.2512278182739273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528452931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030879593,0.000075780714,0.00003950065,0.2723089,0.00059309765,0.0001889676,0.000008374763,0.00014874787,0.69575703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558705,0.000029007168,0.000028974831,0.04018781,0.002693509,0.000052419306,0.0000035949593,0.000016611564,0.0011175716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976143,0.00065045484,0.00021124152,0.00023636923,0.0007229229,0.00056469545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858314,0.0005684623,0.000046755682,0.0001818135,0.00029883938,0.00032101732],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072755467,0.00015727704,0.0001907313,0.00003269724,0.0015673982,0.00018069388,0.00039597202,0.0002065516,0.00056241587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014849356,0.00011874626,0.0002919056,0.0001981898,0.0011000094,0.00015006143,0.000052833213,0.00041030644,0.0010136716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010002519,0.00008285732,0.000033498232,0.000002011077,0.000023019424,0.000010635682,0.015268677,2.8126342e-7,0.000010840759,0.95273185,0.031770106,0.00005621426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001382559,0.00006685618,0.00005317697,0.000009722907,0.000020622772,0.0000025989737,0.02112882,0.000004871172,0.000078950405,0.8573754,0.12097838,0.00014234164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015122555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056804998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024150586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023233885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559048077","doi":"10.1177/0191453716680126","title":"‘A passion for justice’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Passions; Passion; Destiny (ISS module); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.129242535161494,"score_gpt":0.4017640110850128,"score_spread":0.27252147592351883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559048077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013977436,0.00007859508,0.002561777,0.49506524,0.0014347933,0.0003934873,0.00016481853,0.0002540797,0.49864945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784262,0.000046237637,0.00024157405,0.007888993,0.011443172,0.000086076274,0.0000036369051,0.000029914518,0.0018341641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782634,0.0002240315,0.00028205276,0.00032876126,0.000522924,0.0008159001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774885,0.0013683749,0.000057986847,0.00015105546,0.00034730477,0.00032641078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078096386,0.00016916732,0.00024164334,0.00006236253,0.0020659056,0.00005865421,0.00033632197,0.0003368164,0.00025986752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002164571,0.00013379239,0.00026254644,0.00015682251,0.0011686534,0.0003352233,0.000051045812,0.00017744915,0.00025299986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035119567,0.00007117256,0.000007471739,0.000056617388,0.000012432916,0.0000028398172,0.002443763,9.640685e-9,0.00023815068,0.98748523,0.0058589554,0.003788241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038807816,0.00004856746,0.00005655174,0.00004081901,0.000056845853,2.2772936e-7,0.00021432423,8.093076e-7,0.00018364468,0.8327159,0.16609024,0.00020396011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000676918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019473417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013660651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019444764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593004753","doi":"10.1177/0191453717692645","title":"Two ways of being a left-Heideggerian","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Ontology; Foundationalism; Sociology; Reading (process); Identification (biology); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11331656382168068,"score_gpt":0.38259745222433733,"score_spread":0.2692808884026566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593004753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024357542,0.00004871622,0.00008849786,0.18636197,0.0006303641,0.00022177248,0.000038700637,0.000107991065,0.78814447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871525,0.000011898103,0.00020848608,0.0057240427,0.0066988277,0.000012200166,0.0000037494503,0.000031788917,0.00015650902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976696,0.0002965849,0.00040626584,0.0003598552,0.0006296076,0.0006381129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984483,0.0004057903,0.00017049564,0.00047983916,0.00028600256,0.00020953122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009995007,0.00021416198,0.00044673504,0.00007291868,0.0045748902,0.00024170337,0.0009832799,0.00021877319,0.0004969643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013103483,0.00024253318,0.0003511789,0.000090830676,0.0027204533,0.000581276,0.00017273714,0.00040297682,0.00008742381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029120636,0.000083550105,0.00023264132,0.000044779666,0.000028421118,0.00003388484,0.009861687,6.616383e-8,0.000512528,0.9880567,0.000222512,0.0008940681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004237677,0.0000416273,0.00025648493,0.000046733927,0.000051458504,0.0000013151828,0.00053898053,0.0000015712798,0.00056632556,0.9759205,0.021881009,0.0002702324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054070365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006077889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96279496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000634433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009210171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605758769","doi":"10.1177/0191453717702800","title":"White nationalism, armed culture and state violence in the age of Donald Trump","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; White supremacy; Politics; Nationalism; Presidency; Authoritarianism; Political science; Elite; State (computer science); Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.050132850781985025,"score_gpt":0.3529455626527644,"score_spread":0.30281271187077935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605758769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8317837,0.00023692795,0.000020435838,0.067349255,0.0004830474,0.00056288217,0.00015865188,0.000043558684,0.09936152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960059,0.00013316762,0.00008984972,0.0028117679,0.000631298,0.000028722969,0.000010592826,0.00001094332,0.00027773634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980725,0.00028675623,0.0002755717,0.00024573054,0.00078465923,0.0003347556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930483,0.000114027476,0.00017446806,0.00021384463,0.000133644,0.000059186175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009046345,0.00013877418,0.00022654956,0.000055837667,0.001610743,0.00019734848,0.00074985874,0.00010784524,0.000026061363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000398336,0.0001120673,0.000084418396,0.00011442943,0.0011961279,0.00040098172,0.00008880234,0.00023609489,0.000005489807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035541787,0.00021735343,0.015690885,0.00006972725,0.00003783898,0.000064359316,0.17511359,7.19361e-7,0.00038801605,0.8059507,0.0009658275,0.001465446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044714325,0.000019657737,0.16408773,0.000084635176,0.000017005987,3.7960697e-7,0.0012135772,0.0000019685779,0.000045722998,0.82814246,0.0057908134,0.0001488724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016169514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022386601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17390001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067944056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076897246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756108888","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358834","title":"Faith in law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Separation of church and state; Citizenship; Obligation; Faith; Sociology; Realm; Politics; State (computer science); Secular state; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02785350278673347,"score_gpt":0.3378942874117365,"score_spread":0.310040784625003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756108888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07162689,0.0000446381,0.000026153923,0.024750184,0.0008668331,0.0001741235,0.000006775062,0.000097484466,0.90240693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551696,0.000012483874,0.00012979786,0.0015308395,0.0024613559,0.000026489906,0.000004559229,0.000013873284,0.00030366838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875885,0.00010503067,0.00018921112,0.0002007565,0.00039204548,0.00035410677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00008725337,0.00003641822,0.00009966619,0.00010880495,0.00010003542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043512552,0.00009994024,0.00014815743,0.000075091055,0.00066387275,0.00009160096,0.00023612753,0.00018475718,0.0001590261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018963976,0.000110217916,0.00008707261,0.00022692415,0.0008982094,0.0002607089,0.000027400174,0.00029882687,0.00010911631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047976214,0.00007011473,0.00024542067,0.000007437819,0.0000020168472,0.000007888382,0.012302816,7.45899e-8,0.0004905825,0.98517895,0.00086909014,0.00082081376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028793485,0.000012679523,0.001331566,0.0000057967486,0.000008138875,4.0542423e-7,0.0013833067,0.000002757573,0.000092225455,0.9828141,0.013912035,0.00014906359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088666435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021436831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92389005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050805636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000852064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798143792","doi":"10.1177/0191453718768344","title":"Open thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Negation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Reading (process); Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12014153429414676,"score_gpt":0.4297368056626307,"score_spread":0.30959527136848397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798143792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033881336,0.00006728507,0.00020387328,0.07704719,0.00102754,0.00036703667,0.000025902065,0.0002124393,0.9176606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732109,0.000008338983,0.0003754561,0.010428011,0.014935227,0.00003382693,0.000005392453,0.000033042215,0.00096982444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974249,0.0005518377,0.00030184444,0.0004286938,0.00062666653,0.0006660806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873686,0.0003521343,0.000055740522,0.00023945647,0.00035387772,0.00026194038],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015821031,0.00019326594,0.00030912692,0.00006977921,0.004581694,0.00057482865,0.0015721371,0.00021436678,0.0025442536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057839137,0.00021238318,0.00017199581,0.00044652325,0.0022939686,0.0007275565,0.00045602297,0.0003026263,0.00094572833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042085125,0.00010099443,0.000027378032,0.000011239195,0.00001820099,0.000011945579,0.018063026,1.3334467e-8,0.000052805513,0.97858655,0.0017407993,0.0013449354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023192837,0.000062899584,0.00003653912,0.000023409331,0.000022598906,8.40959e-7,0.0009082545,9.240855e-7,0.00009205162,0.78223854,0.21615154,0.00023050257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036214973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013672074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96982276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010009272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011883307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802056914","doi":"10.1177/0191453718768353","title":"Stability and the sense of justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Public reason; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.102411185838791,"score_gpt":0.3727140318956751,"score_spread":0.2703028460568841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802056914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062245548,0.00018532766,0.00006714844,0.15136856,0.00054603996,0.00028338472,0.00004957256,0.000067440924,0.785187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910195,0.000031749845,0.00006747445,0.0042518848,0.0045388616,0.000008707323,7.922683e-7,0.000010184737,0.00007086421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784654,0.00076714274,0.00028618585,0.00021466725,0.00049120444,0.00039425612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976488,0.0015258247,0.00006710284,0.00017429795,0.00043769754,0.00014632521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019590405,0.000117240554,0.0002678233,0.000025733001,0.0017066764,0.000043049316,0.00019489437,0.0001789983,0.00017933473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024046141,0.00009308363,0.00012239163,0.0002098498,0.013173492,0.00015269748,0.000089487796,0.0003013076,0.000034336703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008768749,0.000045125747,0.000014257008,0.000063314284,0.000014351978,0.000001508303,0.03422476,3.9769987e-9,0.000041915933,0.9652153,0.00015435524,0.00013740984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102308,0.000040312112,0.0001838142,0.0000124096605,0.00011862536,7.439299e-7,0.002299642,0.000007364,0.00021476967,0.99239075,0.004110261,0.00011110369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079484447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010788496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92877394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004131486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013351871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916250967","doi":"10.1177/0191453719828035","title":"Lefort, Abensour and the question: What is ‘savage’ democracy?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Identity (music); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Representative democracy; Transformative learning; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03244665453664793,"score_gpt":0.3536518557224663,"score_spread":0.3212052011858184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916250967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09711019,0.0028603503,0.00003366079,0.46927503,0.0021261922,0.0009964237,0.000039493003,0.0002756037,0.42728305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96625,0.00063033315,0.00006176555,0.026129512,0.0055408045,0.00004724648,0.00000487251,0.000041829266,0.0012936242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597955,0.0015651224,0.00041978108,0.0005255966,0.00065284915,0.0008570795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745953,0.0015616282,0.00012004109,0.00034532195,0.00024014863,0.00027330423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023010697,0.0002999037,0.0005546059,0.000070053546,0.0020223265,0.00033068526,0.0005690822,0.0004041009,0.00052701606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005867033,0.0002507095,0.00030825438,0.00022498409,0.0053639207,0.00090169825,0.0001889329,0.0006393904,0.00065416365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050691422,0.000043690095,0.00022705937,0.000031281266,0.000050699415,0.000006217234,0.015921308,9.41558e-8,0.00001925983,0.98238057,0.0004556257,0.0008134775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010257864,0.000040722538,0.0007185617,0.000047602847,0.00007597269,0.000004172254,0.005760777,0.000007750144,0.000018547411,0.97802025,0.013969371,0.0003104624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034443848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014769948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86913985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014795657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964807947","doi":"10.1177/0191453719866233","title":"Fellow travellers on different paths: A conversation with Charles Taylor","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Humanities and Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Disenchantment; Epistemology; Naturalism; Conversation; Constructivism (international relations); Mainstream; Doctrine; Sociology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Politics; Law; Political science; Theology; International relations","score_opus":0.03694841780693051,"score_gpt":0.2799425628064941,"score_spread":0.2429941449995636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964807947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68602806,0.000042653683,0.00002441702,0.022599168,0.0007870036,0.0005788665,0.000027600287,0.00013105114,0.28978118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481857,0.000040775925,0.000015266842,0.0018652665,0.0017699838,0.000035084548,0.000008303831,0.000020643976,0.0014260821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976594,0.00023515715,0.00020824521,0.0003689415,0.0009776666,0.0005506042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930274,0.00018227783,0.00009717773,0.000117793556,0.00013475878,0.00016523998],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036189004,0.00020682003,0.00030173574,0.00007401667,0.0014757311,0.0002099889,0.0003295547,0.00015119955,0.0011603252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046945064,0.00017423999,0.00015549346,0.00021412896,0.0008494644,0.0002777761,0.00002536462,0.00021393651,0.0002537776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054525473,0.00014225511,0.0008352222,0.00002794127,0.000029985635,0.00000699655,0.16331233,0.000001178373,0.00009027063,0.8326185,0.00029113874,0.002589707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033729153,0.0017082909,0.018614866,0.0002255624,0.00016755793,0.0000011193282,0.382593,0.000106522115,0.00041293708,0.52134037,0.06931072,0.0021461423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009554278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090227555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31127807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021924567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106436426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000934162","doi":"10.1177/0191453718810928","title":"Passions, virtue, and rational life","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Virtue; Passion; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perfection; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Eudaimonia; Power (physics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0764754392555748,"score_gpt":0.25538937903693626,"score_spread":0.17891393978136144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000934162","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01972501,0.0011084971,0.00005717663,0.4909546,0.0006864468,0.00021067713,0.00022753622,0.00022760533,0.48680246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95583636,0.0000101947535,0.00003659185,0.034451097,0.009343251,0.000018223196,0.000023921655,0.000019561983,0.00026081182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990746,0.000088801586,0.00022687418,0.0002486814,0.00017399022,0.00018707124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994653,0.00013337785,0.00004997055,0.00006679711,0.00008784582,0.00019674879],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008059373,0.00016403722,0.0002322235,0.000032975597,0.000988308,0.00008637153,0.00013212209,0.00008233067,0.002435532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013712245,0.00015809434,0.00010164188,0.00002814552,0.0007161335,0.00023238128,0.00006380917,0.00024579858,0.00022511501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048605372,0.000041220053,0.000033162763,0.000035555906,0.000035876827,0.0000071082277,0.010104366,1.3388384e-7,0.000041187443,0.98026615,0.009163365,0.00022327933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039780434,0.00009994871,0.0002437019,0.000009832347,0.00004160963,0.0000013231787,0.0005022418,0.000018497583,0.000013793147,0.87149024,0.12696911,0.00021192284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008596228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006227677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93611133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070922993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003848421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020473509","doi":"10.1177/0191453720919917","title":"Historical materialism as mediation between the physical and the meaningful","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Reductionism; Materialism; Natural (archaeology); Historical materialism; Mediation; Ideology; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Politics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Marxist philosophy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.049178886617960244,"score_gpt":0.24335724475170895,"score_spread":0.1941783581337487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020473509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07253286,0.0031582925,0.000026091197,0.5184534,0.0049187094,0.0009170653,0.00016559033,0.0004662967,0.39936167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517056,0.000021050111,0.000005181681,0.0057209395,0.042256545,0.00006026043,0.0000123647,0.000040701092,0.00017739079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983373,0.0002477976,0.00032641386,0.00032367173,0.000487207,0.000277565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991627,0.00027889354,0.00013119217,0.00016810888,0.00012381877,0.00013533574],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021220704,0.0002541893,0.0004642144,0.00005764457,0.0019847553,0.00019818395,0.00036083843,0.00007359448,0.00012631885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011927522,0.00016765308,0.00031783257,0.00008423272,0.0015314341,0.00020300556,0.00008274786,0.00035465855,0.000093894676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076671604,0.000029144212,0.000011429682,0.000034634897,0.0000566578,0.000003345525,0.15935321,2.6401201e-8,0.000036372552,0.8286592,0.011504251,0.00023510108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071938854,0.000088670946,0.00007538378,0.0000052793307,0.00019658465,6.606749e-7,0.0005575796,0.0000049222003,0.000009005568,0.5241152,0.47402188,0.00020543288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032516103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015895015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8791727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014213701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027417864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035806552","doi":"10.1177/0191453720931904","title":"Good life egalitarianism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Possession (linguistics); The good life; Sociology; Inequality; Arbitrariness; Positive economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.14274001728275582,"score_gpt":0.36134982575521213,"score_spread":0.2186098084724563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035806552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009825454,0.00013813765,0.00013428784,0.43735456,0.00037817858,0.00016472062,0.00005518935,0.00028407577,0.5605083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146404,0.000020555963,0.0001602635,0.0714576,0.01339363,0.000020580359,0.0000083945615,0.00003632255,0.00026223488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968905,0.0004940995,0.0004040503,0.0004460538,0.00090712303,0.00085816084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981,0.00037649422,0.0000654678,0.00015294358,0.00022044074,0.0010846892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005721306,0.00023916643,0.00038707073,0.000042194388,0.0018656122,0.00014786165,0.0005724325,0.00041009934,0.0008627749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002348898,0.00027554433,0.0003065039,0.00041257584,0.0012924651,0.0004076292,0.000113754766,0.0007481836,0.0011661446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019512081,0.00007056833,0.000022326447,0.000046745383,0.00003029914,0.000020268908,0.025000082,1.908362e-7,0.000043253312,0.97134686,0.0032571217,0.00014278536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003207496,0.00006002209,0.00010342044,0.000010438903,0.00004759112,3.0849233e-7,0.001177491,0.0000075309476,0.000027391337,0.8600189,0.13791277,0.00031337948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005065936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002543503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91365784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010119646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045793102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3056755204","doi":"10.1177/0191453720948388","title":"Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Authoritarianism; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political economy; Context (archaeology); Ideal (ethics); China; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046902506748996355,"score_gpt":0.31513650705066626,"score_spread":0.2682340003016699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3056755204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16941105,0.00053682574,0.0003707882,0.6883837,0.0010497961,0.0005766671,0.00017713773,0.00038917747,0.13910484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96889263,0.000118886026,0.00056956767,0.021377608,0.008445735,0.000032255557,0.000007646343,0.000043311466,0.0005123773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997588,0.00019823838,0.0004355837,0.0005455384,0.0005472715,0.0006853865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987367,0.00029666384,0.00020306092,0.00019540511,0.00013323431,0.0004349824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031955497,0.0002607846,0.00046680952,0.000022678605,0.0019145032,0.00016052119,0.0005716758,0.00030265513,0.00066717167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010785052,0.00027973566,0.0003116192,0.00028132982,0.0012846806,0.00042448653,0.0001178281,0.0006298184,0.00021591966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003498763,0.000041626132,0.00052672555,0.00002096683,0.000033669825,0.000020635393,0.120038934,8.405358e-7,0.000031265383,0.8713812,0.0066999253,0.0011692188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042876916,0.00007089191,0.00079006195,0.000028429798,0.000033742046,9.381847e-7,0.009632926,0.000012681099,0.00004440434,0.85561574,0.13290451,0.00043691008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018197517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020232235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030862723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000364918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091779379","doi":"10.1177/0191453720961523","title":"Epistemic injustice in workplace hierarchies: Power, knowledge and status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Conceptualization; Hierarchy; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Testimonial; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05988944543227058,"score_gpt":0.34866129608608076,"score_spread":0.28877185065381017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091779379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11642907,0.01191736,0.00004920699,0.19306764,0.0007577578,0.00050305144,0.00005611817,0.00021652701,0.67700326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504465,0.0004803147,0.0001038336,0.0029940954,0.00091989257,0.00003175779,0.0000030798374,0.000018663073,0.00040373023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978932,0.0005098186,0.00031673213,0.00041170436,0.00023059204,0.0006379465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890363,0.0006175731,0.00005979863,0.000083757455,0.0000867552,0.0002485022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044541346,0.00019439778,0.00038264628,0.00007351932,0.001096775,0.00005059298,0.00021873743,0.0001971528,0.000059767983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076761434,0.00022284788,0.00007987668,0.0004639417,0.0013584779,0.0001605453,0.00015259895,0.00042282545,0.00007069834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008781732,0.00008330134,0.0049912054,0.00015503367,0.000032874745,0.000038716313,0.35749716,1.3894636e-7,0.000019979061,0.6337418,0.0023373018,0.0010146531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016649655,0.00027907218,0.023865115,0.000117857795,0.000100474404,0.0000032692374,0.09948054,0.000011083815,0.000015671838,0.7733642,0.10026066,0.00083713327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023634236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047136727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87861556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010514384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018637654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123480495","doi":"10.1177/0191453713485722","title":"On the politics of perception in moving image technology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Cognitivism (psychology); Politics; Epistemology; Cognition; Perception; Political philosophy; Sociology; Critical theory; Theme (computing); Cognitive science; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0346233718284018,"score_gpt":0.27183879325013854,"score_spread":0.23721542142173674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123480495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112548,0.000036612077,0.000005023585,0.028395642,0.00014378043,0.00019694415,0.000016231239,0.000051880783,0.2598991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615026,0.0000019788301,0.000013173748,0.0020202824,0.00094716606,0.000037946418,0.0000029708365,0.00001411777,0.0008121263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993041,0.000058724578,0.00019364578,0.000113140806,0.00012542299,0.00020493109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962956,0.000086929715,0.000040430503,0.00010195385,0.00012240643,0.000018697181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009723655,0.00010279443,0.00015016343,0.00009781676,0.00038788252,0.00005152304,0.00015009714,0.00006173484,0.001968853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070305105,0.00007311551,0.00007613574,0.00004740169,0.00064465904,0.00014786182,0.000038013965,0.00020697934,0.00026804183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021738012,0.00007571402,0.000006587635,0.000019569374,0.0000058500195,0.0000010950666,0.022412635,5.1524854e-8,0.0025955907,0.9733237,0.0013153023,0.00024170445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010988039,0.00006762595,0.00013720576,0.00003063669,0.000008159416,4.1736683e-7,0.013196344,0.00000816261,0.00025946955,0.9842182,0.0018732548,0.000090690046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089364155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022305188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28489545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027056996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009282549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134608683","doi":"10.1177/0191453721998732","title":"Mapping the individual and the community in Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Martin luther king; Democracy; Civil rights; Voting; Sociology; Political science; White (mutation); Law; Religious studies; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11571742022493031,"score_gpt":0.24979242462532722,"score_spread":0.1340750044003969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134608683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7034401,0.0030820272,0.0000017484464,0.0477091,0.00049713807,0.0003070269,0.000092066126,0.0000451296,0.24482562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027264,0.000024493596,0.0000073668157,0.0072036088,0.001778783,0.000036173908,0.000012817354,0.00002257714,0.0006415244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821043,0.0008777796,0.00027007563,0.00017387696,0.0002028817,0.000264934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.00044218765,0.0000689543,0.00020861284,0.00007595025,0.000043502223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085380144,0.00018024415,0.00026463662,0.000057015677,0.0027989452,0.00028962604,0.00021974702,0.00007414298,0.0003930989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000830199,0.00012547994,0.000092460505,0.000070437665,0.0018456157,0.00015917176,0.00017770071,0.00073157344,0.000017997703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002581192,0.000049141177,0.00013076229,0.000049450795,0.00003145382,0.00001417349,0.35790023,5.827082e-8,0.0000059365007,0.64105535,0.00033854018,0.00039911142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001377972,0.000025687474,0.0020339713,0.00006137482,0.0000541241,0.000012680009,0.018473638,0.0000074330846,0.0000111906875,0.87845767,0.0992506,0.00023365555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034536317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078113505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33942658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025818546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031942418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164598357","doi":"10.1177/01914537211017607","title":"Book Review: Public Art and the Fragility of Democracy: An Essay in Political Aesthetics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Democracy; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05813381458174299,"score_gpt":0.3002848854613129,"score_spread":0.24215107087956989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164598357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038019053,0.06608598,0.00005188769,0.4836789,0.0004265708,0.0005277054,0.00024383418,0.00008025078,0.44510296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125872,0.0012980618,0.000019574853,0.08140775,0.0011618877,0.000025578158,0.000036561498,0.000026091282,0.0034372977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.00043481847,0.0004964537,0.00027026306,0.00029162606,0.00046958195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895346,0.00020578102,0.00007069624,0.000286976,0.00033142796,0.00015164664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047967694,0.00017950799,0.0004940663,0.00004293962,0.00045490792,0.000094223324,0.00017572173,0.00007665532,0.000806215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028305812,0.00014705818,0.00016552539,0.000008494156,0.0022387172,0.00029086057,0.00010251747,0.00030275053,0.000017732436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009704641,0.00018392602,0.000034197903,0.00030480843,0.00001542436,0.00001279592,0.018330585,1.3629602e-8,0.000001711236,0.97167844,0.009185825,0.00024254856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049384555,0.000025755602,0.000087791,0.00008975836,0.000057572353,0.000005817371,0.000661288,0.000017629776,0.000018431374,0.6356629,0.3627479,0.00013129057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120042074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005285113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049680304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017724744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224236438","doi":"10.1177/01914537221079677","title":"Comedy as dissonant rhetoric","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Comedy; Consonance and dissonance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Scholarship; Deliberation; Aesthetics; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Transformative learning; Normative; Politics; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.050412214578141296,"score_gpt":0.3685987087480033,"score_spread":0.318186494169862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224236438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06728532,0.00094928144,0.00003767733,0.073405884,0.001971706,0.0004310606,0.00028858712,0.0002215112,0.85540897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907934,0.000006494473,0.000019026727,0.0031085708,0.0014528722,0.0009533577,0.000028604814,0.00003438246,0.003603281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986486,0.000116786156,0.00022931592,0.0003233879,0.00029959335,0.00038234313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950165,0.00009749675,0.00005477809,0.0002313616,0.00003424451,0.00008049501],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014127891,0.0001426621,0.00022218606,0.00005045546,0.0018093825,0.000017428416,0.0002954111,0.0000392716,0.0057418495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015853091,0.00015797373,0.00015874028,0.00030224008,0.0001441378,0.000017428443,0.00021615735,0.0003259258,0.00087913626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001639224,0.0003453442,0.00008057312,0.0000063912767,0.00005387868,0.000030207446,0.008377512,2.1481455e-7,0.000052015323,0.96898013,0.020680077,0.0013772554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045637006,0.00012977888,0.0042912643,0.0000016397685,0.00004572483,0.000016411412,0.0046428563,0.0000016870828,0.000004452277,0.36794937,0.6222248,0.00023568122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010340498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002876362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010380016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021416849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229014853","doi":"10.1177/01914537221093726","title":"A living critique of domination: Exemplars of radical democracy from Black Lives Matter to #MeToo","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Communism, Protests, Social Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political radicalism; Articulation (sociology); Democratic theory; Political philosophy; Critical theory; Gender studies; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03525088712234815,"score_gpt":0.3406705094461917,"score_spread":0.30541962232384356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229014853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843765,0.00023792456,0.0003270333,0.07272801,0.00070817984,0.0011758567,0.00036463622,0.00009746522,0.039984353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936791,0.000017626648,0.0011150708,0.0037274552,0.0009985765,0.00016453583,0.000012842241,0.000044009426,0.0002407858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956432,0.0015624977,0.0006817883,0.00036134553,0.0012661404,0.00048502834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762946,0.0013334582,0.00025218463,0.0002963643,0.00031268588,0.00017582224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012260019,0.00021276745,0.0005412486,0.0001903517,0.0019394059,0.000057203266,0.00096885394,0.00012239942,0.0031846517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008548097,0.0002878121,0.00029756065,0.00063364336,0.0010266654,0.0003030895,0.00076685735,0.00046603227,0.00004058007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014915942,0.0016288459,0.008970731,0.00018614545,0.00022281484,0.00003337569,0.5868301,0.000008505944,0.0056804647,0.38662252,0.0061917324,0.0034756304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000681445,0.00022598833,0.021288963,0.00016292976,0.00012228437,7.214082e-7,0.041014735,0.000008692072,0.00064447057,0.9301724,0.0051190793,0.00055831583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004874965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027442115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54581535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041162956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025184485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240105843","doi":"10.1177/019145370102700601","title":"The structure of hip consumerism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumerism; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Collective action; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Action (physics); Ideal (ethics); Aesthetics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Politics; Philosophy; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.0327807864756732,"score_gpt":0.3186668710086891,"score_spread":0.2858860845330159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240105843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7249287,0.0010752998,0.000024372868,0.06625366,0.001674789,0.00044304464,0.00008948181,0.0001713714,0.20533928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962449,0.00023608281,0.000030495456,0.00064001675,0.0019149656,0.0000043825803,0.000005611675,0.000012933354,0.00091062195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984795,0.00021404523,0.00024881703,0.00015929114,0.0004988237,0.00039951826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992041,0.00022867299,0.00010176471,0.000106047584,0.00026746935,0.000091964204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001966442,0.00012685906,0.00020178499,0.000018939649,0.0024514678,0.00007431647,0.00038097656,0.00017643518,0.00017162021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025311735,0.00009691455,0.0001743854,0.00033662864,0.001387483,0.00013720908,0.00004098528,0.00021608263,0.000017828777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018252249,0.000025367215,0.00047004962,0.000008164332,0.000031466287,0.000004394212,0.015745236,1.6422605e-7,0.0007647649,0.97439677,0.00073707494,0.0077982866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020175148,0.000019207791,0.0021974784,0.000008966858,0.00003824699,0.0000012809044,0.008965292,0.0000028889062,0.00007540419,0.9215023,0.06681114,0.00017604127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078375835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008293412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2713162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006736155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009572906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242111780","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974741","title":"Constitutional Alchemy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Alchemy; Epistemology; Identity (music); Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11997144585196808,"score_gpt":0.3581636668506953,"score_spread":0.23819222099872722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242111780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003022,0.00009350814,0.00060509925,0.077366844,0.00023919964,0.000106673964,0.00005134857,0.00016043066,0.9183549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707994,0.000007712904,0.00010630712,0.024734523,0.0042016865,0.000010433249,0.0000062010363,0.0000050944295,0.00012867009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865174,0.00021287789,0.0001660062,0.00021283077,0.00032660432,0.00042992903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.0002130248,0.000026359096,0.00005195177,0.00009505015,0.00030814987],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022410102,0.00010314839,0.00018681672,0.00001141737,0.0011359054,0.00003176918,0.00023420111,0.00017945042,0.0014689196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071935804,0.00011520946,0.00014255462,0.00014974001,0.0040271897,0.00016234534,0.000048143473,0.00024331253,0.00053915306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001415608,0.000033370674,0.000044402666,0.000008228564,0.000016442258,0.000015270787,0.0023406828,1.2160135e-7,0.000013294413,0.9967538,0.000567834,0.0001923646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021515564,0.000016968801,0.000116144234,0.0000033731842,0.00001720432,6.1534183e-7,0.0004941457,0.000003641173,0.000059622922,0.9373244,0.061614525,0.00013422102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002469441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012377996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005595367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018250765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249158652","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974715","title":"Schmittean logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Rule of law; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.14036101430998324,"score_gpt":0.36746203460031357,"score_spread":0.22710102029033033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249158652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008742269,0.000108381784,0.00024156223,0.12559749,0.00024391315,0.00013130171,0.00002292144,0.00024343577,0.8646687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955088,0.00001271903,0.00012783331,0.039552152,0.0049641808,0.000009909327,0.0000035157466,0.000013470621,0.00022818391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982294,0.00039920944,0.00019187723,0.00026737433,0.00033920247,0.0005729487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921805,0.00021387519,0.00003359448,0.000081535894,0.000089609006,0.00036332282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003092201,0.00012990441,0.00023750521,0.000023027209,0.0011583819,0.000045031415,0.00034921092,0.00022390108,0.0013521109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008304124,0.00013893469,0.00017202021,0.00021503233,0.0012340419,0.00017366232,0.00007051073,0.00033237998,0.0007931456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015661824,0.00003439256,0.000057341564,0.00001232993,0.000013761755,0.000021941642,0.0043631117,7.579932e-8,0.000011321653,0.99455994,0.00053552666,0.0003745779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016315375,0.000038521503,0.0003231702,0.0000039296647,0.000020320636,3.4470892e-7,0.0010397593,0.0000046214072,0.00003843965,0.9816978,0.016501911,0.00016805161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049906506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002907195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94634575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005396773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010474012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281913340","doi":"10.1177/01914537221103897","title":"A call for psycho-affective change: Fanon, feminism, and white negrophobic femininity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalytic theory; Femininity; White (mutation); Human sexuality; Feminism; Psychoanalysis; Freudian slip; Gender studies; Narcissism; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0991625234576514,"score_gpt":0.3612371530273229,"score_spread":0.2620746295696715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281913340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3611298,0.0025405933,0.0003825989,0.10828521,0.009740287,0.00662826,0.0016189668,0.0008060266,0.5088683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631203,0.000099222336,0.00019553829,0.0054158224,0.0050558825,0.0016415511,0.000037936312,0.000056697827,0.0011853117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969691,0.0004797092,0.0003233303,0.00063560973,0.0007413227,0.00085094327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986383,0.00047503287,0.00014060424,0.00019652737,0.00019491684,0.00035467366],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011490593,0.00029298748,0.00045774732,0.00013890435,0.0036124387,0.00009545804,0.0004065548,0.00020089412,0.00021353926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024642856,0.00035065052,0.0002556394,0.00042068737,0.00068790937,0.00020970036,0.00018709943,0.00048073326,0.000013911695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020812525,0.00048501304,0.0012909087,0.00015089122,0.00009473372,0.000034576464,0.7941439,2.158154e-7,0.00029440018,0.17635669,0.017797688,0.009142859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035774915,0.001027004,0.008770552,0.000036202007,0.00030684157,0.00001574564,0.19789827,0.000013236746,0.0000876363,0.54017794,0.24676067,0.0013284266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003316978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021125913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6251823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024173927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002721716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283019699","doi":"10.1177/01914537221108467","title":"Online astroturfing: A problem beyond disinformation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Spam and Phishing Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Exploit; Internet privacy; Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Conformity; Social media; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023157368434442653,"score_gpt":0.25441160227518567,"score_spread":0.231254233840743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283019699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21893543,0.00071323157,0.35071743,0.2259815,0.009003093,0.002299851,0.00042651765,0.0036872698,0.18823569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98969054,9.784553e-7,0.007033349,0.002458452,0.0006146177,0.00006932947,0.00003986959,0.000012377906,0.000080458085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862874,0.0000955378,0.00025334492,0.00024281781,0.0005138726,0.0002656758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995438,0.000041538657,0.00009191777,0.00020155057,0.000058744085,0.00006249012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002578739,0.00012679513,0.00014245682,0.00011423184,0.0011446273,0.0001649687,0.00057044515,0.00004073098,0.00004247645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023369726,0.00014609133,0.000108081345,0.00048840465,0.0000407979,0.0007588452,0.00032779842,0.0003457148,0.00002257316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019387666,0.0004052021,0.00003840984,0.000041569718,0.000023496079,0.000013118312,0.012034309,0.00011728379,0.00044485342,0.955529,0.002632521,0.028700873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006267279,0.00036005868,0.0008059868,0.000010074821,0.000017940956,0.000035228182,0.00033936073,0.008484025,0.00018003155,0.9584983,0.030264223,0.00037801993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026504504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029297598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7707551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013043333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005319095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8803663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290792259","doi":"10.1177/01914537221114910","title":"Against ‘institutional racism’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Virtue; Institutional racism; Morality; Epistemology; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08334965642953282,"score_gpt":0.3543654149310007,"score_spread":0.27101575850146786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290792259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009283142,0.0002024726,0.00006867461,0.12985136,0.0014764644,0.00024258262,0.0002272277,0.00026297034,0.8583851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97460777,0.000018013116,0.000082430175,0.0188269,0.0051963483,0.00011749558,0.000040731902,0.000023819812,0.0010864713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965002,0.00065412227,0.00032807107,0.00036915083,0.0013822713,0.00076621433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989928,0.00031770993,0.00006377238,0.00016535225,0.00016278173,0.00029759106],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011292481,0.00018368993,0.00025361075,0.00011293263,0.00903934,0.00008514057,0.0005812289,0.00015425531,0.0015954192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049107644,0.0002307371,0.00027645746,0.00047147207,0.0016481581,0.00030847822,0.00024889086,0.00093524164,0.00025537837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020903584,0.00018106698,0.000016952195,0.000015970592,0.000019379982,0.00005184564,0.008264929,0.000007489287,0.000038935614,0.98799944,0.0024650856,0.00091801904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024402076,0.000027994927,0.00008597879,0.0000044625535,0.000017386856,0.0000018785066,0.00092360366,0.000009609381,0.000010339318,0.73014164,0.26830605,0.0002270641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025472543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021134892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96532464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005236927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059316336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317655842","doi":"10.1177/01914537221150464","title":"Self-esteem and competition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-esteem; Denial; Competition (biology); Social psychology; Criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07692194524237876,"score_gpt":0.35949289588239464,"score_spread":0.28257095064001586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317655842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029750459,0.000110727604,0.000018911132,0.18740791,0.00061479065,0.000246285,0.000052287647,0.0010640048,0.7807346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236387,0.0001503092,0.0000964576,0.0032135404,0.003690973,0.0000236749,0.000012123937,0.000021485144,0.0004275573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981098,0.00028953777,0.00021020717,0.00027447753,0.0005231619,0.00059280294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901426,0.00045642516,0.000034405963,0.00010148812,0.00013652307,0.000256886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073053443,0.00014109109,0.0002086676,0.00010184672,0.0018228242,0.000110118744,0.00018443944,0.0002493347,0.00009469423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033679494,0.00016285814,0.00010076202,0.00046313394,0.0009284126,0.0002727938,0.000081554244,0.0003346918,0.0005840882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000442741,0.000053439548,0.0000362656,0.00006714928,0.000013047642,0.000016371645,0.010849837,5.2418144e-8,0.000019234785,0.9882998,0.0004370985,0.0002032901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019169734,0.0000315597,0.00074472366,0.000017425393,0.000027160235,8.9992244e-7,0.00083739025,0.000013171542,0.000010937449,0.9416221,0.056313556,0.00018938282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015810931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003678318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008331089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104039515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319443662","doi":"10.1177/01914537221147931","title":"Fact versus feeling: What post-truth scholarship can learn from the feminist phenomenology of affect","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Transcendental number; Psychoanalytic theory; Affect (linguistics); Scholarship; Psychology; Irrational number; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Law","score_opus":0.13367140061120047,"score_gpt":0.36710968593746357,"score_spread":0.2334382853262631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319443662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907564,0.0010050621,0.000002568664,0.045778695,0.0053384453,0.00041353423,0.00024117636,0.00025662445,0.039399903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938876,0.000403939,0.000019382891,0.0014857867,0.0038631768,0.00003621437,0.00008256517,0.000041280746,0.00018003758],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693173,0.0006881032,0.0003560614,0.00044436718,0.0007841245,0.00079563004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966565,0.0024604597,0.00014747932,0.0002942232,0.00022344715,0.00021790498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011019553,0.00024636547,0.000426316,0.00009874196,0.0015168528,0.0002124404,0.0007696008,0.00031887705,0.00017899633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002025627,0.00022579495,0.00028014363,0.000568886,0.001214976,0.0002749676,0.0001498286,0.0005534964,0.00019963342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003258499,0.00019481557,0.002049877,0.00006592238,0.00030383677,0.00005724067,0.56988764,0.0000014950331,0.0017614224,0.41037646,0.0010270115,0.013948452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023513455,0.00042669597,0.017491832,0.00009940691,0.00030744623,9.637943e-7,0.5110877,0.0000021310198,0.000707433,0.44353426,0.023269778,0.0007210042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013715511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010232753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08632363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013737989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044499763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321598300","doi":"10.1177/01914537231157381","title":"Supplication as violence: The provision of institutionalized care and the essence of giving","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Sociology; Existentialism; Institution; Exposition (narrative); Reading (process); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.029414839860740612,"score_gpt":0.36673259886149323,"score_spread":0.3373177590007526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321598300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55612665,0.002700819,0.0003252523,0.24189103,0.001129892,0.0020133757,0.000121029145,0.00021044599,0.19548148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853617,0.0006153614,0.00002117339,0.00031404174,0.000393137,0.0000406626,0.0000063683615,0.000006012695,0.00006704861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859154,0.00029310977,0.00022586924,0.00014838214,0.0005696194,0.00017145363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986349,0.00072882965,0.00010808194,0.0001265779,0.00036947452,0.000032146625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009824601,0.00007575565,0.0001616812,0.000036107944,0.001350208,0.000030292107,0.00028915706,0.00010578975,0.000020008634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00103066,0.000050955594,0.00008966942,0.00038107665,0.0030687598,0.0001255507,0.00007680922,0.00017251754,0.000009750363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026620875,0.000011721109,0.00010015829,0.00008887215,0.0000065753034,3.6539765e-7,0.07926061,0.0000014825769,0.00018381957,0.9187789,0.00007105616,0.0014698103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003745131,0.00002270088,0.0013857501,0.00010363647,0.000027183765,3.306491e-7,0.027056955,0.000020974188,0.00019692114,0.9658701,0.00486792,0.00007301914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014523252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44240952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030063538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023600222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327813827","doi":"10.1177/01914537231164657","title":"Marcuse’s critique of technology today","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Ontology; Marxist philosophy; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.050878513824939325,"score_gpt":0.37523331293715395,"score_spread":0.32435479911221465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327813827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048517678,0.0002406402,0.00008616295,0.2561639,0.0009166149,0.00043765368,0.00015460441,0.0010392574,0.6924435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958268,0.000077849014,0.00010445125,0.0012230821,0.0020715562,0.000060176564,0.000011160081,0.00003666225,0.00058827834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757063,0.00036134786,0.00043078986,0.00036226647,0.0005662896,0.00070865866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862385,0.0005485756,0.00006398701,0.00024630412,0.0003441192,0.00017315395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010536055,0.00019714904,0.00042232935,0.00040109054,0.0010184096,0.000040304232,0.0005652506,0.00040996398,0.0005320846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011665141,0.0002268564,0.00027128472,0.0017868597,0.0021092533,0.00022183206,0.00014275634,0.00038859318,0.00038252363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023131946,0.000097368546,0.0000879817,0.0000757486,0.000022616063,0.0000366958,0.0041209045,2.2538705e-7,0.0007705482,0.9916091,0.0012466125,0.0019090454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021883965,0.000056353445,0.0000960046,0.000041031017,0.000027582111,0.0000011222423,0.0019836556,0.000001907972,0.0007299935,0.93311906,0.06349634,0.00022809337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009138299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017555261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94730914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006494098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010666181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92509353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382049551","doi":"10.1177/01914537231186130","title":"The violence inherent in the system","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Invocation; Articulation (sociology); Sociology; Politics; Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Social order; Order (exchange); Actor–network theory; Aesthetics; Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06630357774316104,"score_gpt":0.3589544128290742,"score_spread":0.29265083508591316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382049551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6096897,0.00048304282,0.000017424416,0.12729938,0.0035361166,0.0016227432,0.000046837118,0.00076310127,0.25654167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962785,0.00009740044,0.0000050788663,0.0012306225,0.0019515485,0.00018739988,0.0000038849835,0.00001789588,0.00022765844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686325,0.00083656696,0.0003281466,0.0002601762,0.0010230482,0.00068878726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894893,0.00058018154,0.00007630169,0.00024211094,0.00008350049,0.000068963425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022704387,0.00014753891,0.00017533771,0.00006690575,0.003283554,0.0002292928,0.0010295379,0.00011165112,0.000012712624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027976625,0.00009666873,0.00012973582,0.0008585033,0.0005822843,0.00016063939,0.000100713616,0.00030588888,0.00034875647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059494714,0.000034871875,0.00033804856,0.000023748607,0.000010624278,0.000033183835,0.029707478,7.1102664e-7,0.000017590559,0.965726,0.0019317005,0.0021700887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035881586,0.000027294134,0.012468776,0.0001886176,0.000025049094,7.5089935e-7,0.039978437,0.000037780523,0.00001915202,0.9115732,0.03504968,0.00027245947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016840992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012179597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3865888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027338322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109336346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388752631","doi":"10.1177/01914537231215680","title":"‘Be your own boss’? Normative concerns of algorithmic management in the gig economy: reclaiming agency at work through algorithmic counter-tactics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Normative; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Public relations; Work (physics); Citizen journalism; Boss; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10729815284440589,"score_gpt":0.3560061217708952,"score_spread":0.2487079689264893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388752631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055399805,0.00016401235,0.0005516503,0.03825113,0.00079970324,0.0013261451,0.00016775087,0.00016826163,0.90317154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963285,0.00030665356,0.0001769048,0.0016391928,0.0008196075,0.00015296275,0.000059287657,0.000022506265,0.0004943964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997818,0.0002572215,0.00064083654,0.00028510933,0.00041682672,0.0005820019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991266,0.00030762178,0.00021138025,0.00018614047,0.000106469655,0.000061790226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009548273,0.00022588819,0.00034508453,0.00013012606,0.0009428647,0.00017180623,0.00054047664,0.00015386428,0.00009931596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039805003,0.00022193155,0.00021311526,0.00089685014,0.0005587189,0.0013665948,0.0000851742,0.00026999292,0.0001550051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000492375,0.00016653028,0.00015950578,0.0001731106,0.00014733955,0.000042019037,0.37281886,0.00002430623,0.0000020304801,0.5982933,0.0033677209,0.02475603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010551047,0.00008087999,0.001193597,0.000154448,0.00011322528,0.0000016170311,0.06645531,0.00013882048,0.000038149075,0.7841756,0.14603537,0.00055792724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002500614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013091012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041214004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085397565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9050106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389684539","doi":"10.1177/01914537231219935","title":"Returning to totality: Settler colonialism, decolonization, and struggles for freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Decolonization; Conceptualization; Colonialism; Epistemology; Marxist philosophy; Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; Eurocentrism; Political science; Philosophy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.04446997311786472,"score_gpt":0.35839281739432305,"score_spread":0.31392284427645833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389684539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82005954,0.00018715403,0.00030460965,0.11729782,0.00323546,0.002452095,0.00032205944,0.00052386936,0.05561741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98960733,0.00025832144,0.00057691813,0.0008886515,0.0059156762,0.00005691096,0.00007949818,0.000036104997,0.0025805964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824125,0.00021208338,0.0002819279,0.00032095928,0.00033717407,0.0006065871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874693,0.0004042881,0.0000707712,0.00010444489,0.00044220843,0.00023138175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091605633,0.00013672808,0.00022734603,0.00014164875,0.009750815,0.0001466327,0.00017843443,0.00019642196,0.000049771552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114324546,0.00014412931,0.00007090017,0.0005627951,0.00043465037,0.00019761955,0.0000056707786,0.00011052504,0.000052504496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010600625,0.000026654932,0.0001884771,0.000058433692,0.000011524446,0.0000012933699,0.30022776,0.0000013766976,0.0000050504404,0.69696873,0.0023875125,0.000112573834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003083106,0.00008331039,0.0026585637,0.000028308781,0.0000381316,6.589787e-7,0.008729924,0.000015207347,0.000034191788,0.45757386,0.5302452,0.00028432067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009408054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12077803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5278577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017482575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002104575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402545321","doi":"10.1177/01914537241284525","title":"Revisiting the Rorty–Lyotard debate: The microchip and liberal cosmopolitanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Postmodernism in Literature and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Liberalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liberal democracy; Political science; Democracy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04059483788077032,"score_gpt":0.27531389045678184,"score_spread":0.23471905257601153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402545321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117503256,0.028285136,0.000036972546,0.37627897,0.004957822,0.00058002974,0.0002288988,0.00037096397,0.47175795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675413,0.000043843254,0.000017684999,0.007420117,0.021605905,0.000040907897,0.000023210108,0.00003313199,0.0032738952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989375,0.000109837056,0.00022748642,0.0002341093,0.00018829356,0.00030278938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.0002676926,0.00003195786,0.00014678635,0.00008467441,0.000046102734],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029316772,0.00017844372,0.00014859217,0.000035764737,0.001698472,0.0012095126,0.00019508164,0.00005782108,0.00020205346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028655535,0.000105608065,0.00012702547,0.000044411325,0.0005285914,0.00029431848,0.000056455938,0.00039935115,0.000072282346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046374394,0.000008152977,0.0000037370464,0.00009104283,0.0000341866,0.000006201413,0.10343452,2.8053359e-8,0.00005111739,0.884104,0.0094050355,0.0028573198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053310814,0.000014836588,0.000112314694,0.00007868543,0.00008183921,0.000017156764,0.0026884635,0.00002642608,0.000022209853,0.7077179,0.2890433,0.00014355623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006267267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011368808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85003805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003581039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042418385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402573850","doi":"10.1177/01914537241284521","title":"Marcusean resources to think coloniality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.07003645600207731,"score_gpt":0.3671789546315694,"score_spread":0.2971424986294921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402573850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061174512,0.0010969214,0.000016991848,0.50366664,0.000961003,0.00040253438,0.000136219,0.0006670885,0.4318781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322415,0.00004261075,0.000085169675,0.0051053935,0.009197374,0.000049314152,0.0000048408306,0.00002476959,0.002266349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997534,0.00032374475,0.00028781377,0.0004729179,0.000773676,0.0006078727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990235,0.00033500147,0.000026845406,0.00012052774,0.00016988926,0.00032422843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006529023,0.00022013247,0.0003160854,0.000071478076,0.0023600191,0.0003426076,0.00042490748,0.00017397525,0.00047540723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003699322,0.00018828503,0.00025128588,0.0007600791,0.0007990793,0.00022630711,0.0001722222,0.0003628362,0.0006621892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002124128,0.000043639455,0.00005327073,0.00005213695,0.000049494454,0.000038388185,0.086664386,1.2115605e-7,0.00005698466,0.8967554,0.013674888,0.0025900695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048703154,0.000042276624,0.0008660487,0.000033958757,0.000030126806,4.6319113e-7,0.0016246609,9.602221e-7,0.0000061242986,0.5549533,0.4421908,0.000202575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010205888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034466552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92204964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021552367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008177134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402821541","doi":"10.1177/01914537241284546","title":"Robert Bernasconi and the challenges of a Critical Philosophy of Race: (Un)learning to read and teach the history of moral philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Institution; Historiography; Philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Contemporary philosophy; Law; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.04642418967091355,"score_gpt":0.25938308470943716,"score_spread":0.2129588950385236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402821541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050292335,0.125341,0.000008768657,0.7473789,0.0008986008,0.00043342455,0.00007599833,0.00007586798,0.075495094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951959,0.0015871137,0.00002634259,0.00045897323,0.0017692873,0.00004468022,0.0000022276672,0.000028955765,0.0008864655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808115,0.0002822787,0.00055985525,0.00034921576,0.00046135802,0.00026613474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984939,0.00081645977,0.00011700979,0.00016654628,0.0003186138,0.000087475026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005035845,0.00026345954,0.0007828293,0.00008781055,0.001131576,0.000039679246,0.00024127521,0.0000944555,0.00014393292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028705626,0.00015835337,0.00038885523,0.000092324786,0.0049008518,0.0001495822,0.0001935367,0.0004347528,0.000004052227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005569579,0.00007166522,0.0000057342672,0.0004845492,0.0002064247,0.0000039366464,0.24288695,4.0890387e-7,0.000023426734,0.7542493,0.00049022347,0.0015217433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051811314,0.0002767237,0.00005137519,0.0002212309,0.0006917537,0.0000031801044,0.011893447,0.000058420286,0.0000079252495,0.95490474,0.031088661,0.00028444003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063094293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000108359054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002325001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029774257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409467525","doi":"10.1177/01914537251331135","title":"Radical labour republicanism: A defence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030605323801190545,"score_gpt":0.346118362080353,"score_spread":0.3155130382791625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409467525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012000756,0.0001538053,0.00045716332,0.1823346,0.0006680842,0.00020288817,0.00003048803,0.00023712807,0.8039151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703308,0.000026979946,0.00023269496,0.021459335,0.0017552611,0.000056267974,0.0000032534515,0.000011212768,0.006124237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980001,0.00027201758,0.00031495767,0.000365777,0.00031258987,0.0007345753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990041,0.00034943357,0.00004323761,0.00017807308,0.00015714116,0.00026799232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006530678,0.00015176118,0.00028567205,0.0001067784,0.0014876088,0.00015904265,0.00047391435,0.00024745998,0.0007031137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011477893,0.00017474475,0.00019300925,0.00044661344,0.0014233578,0.00031116238,0.00011249458,0.0003335892,0.00013777809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080037435,0.00008252214,0.000083090206,0.000024135745,0.000019280604,0.000010361944,0.0016370887,2.6738194e-8,0.000016754519,0.99207544,0.0038501949,0.0021930768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018428436,0.000009731791,0.0006176598,0.000013810518,0.00001642127,3.785251e-7,0.00043658682,0.0000016495364,0.000031179625,0.6443969,0.35416853,0.00012286448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010577705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001352313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021246166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005516914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414268673","doi":"10.1177/01914537251377694","title":"Adorno and negative dialectics: The case of feminist religious agency","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminist philosophy; Feminist theory; Identity (music); Dialectic; Subject (documents); Agency (philosophy); Political philosophy; Critical theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.02843161643901525,"score_gpt":0.3650149520286046,"score_spread":0.33658333558958936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414268673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14425702,0.0010159592,0.00010434072,0.097341694,0.0011334402,0.0005023763,0.000053519485,0.00009798191,0.75549364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467963,0.0005107127,0.00006022441,0.0034362676,0.0005597432,0.00003336467,8.801526e-7,0.000008366996,0.00071082753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884135,0.00028844285,0.00027323843,0.0001888147,0.00017374265,0.00023440129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986561,0.00083710504,0.000085766354,0.00012863294,0.00022477585,0.00006763084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035380828,0.00011304832,0.00020083426,0.000050112154,0.0020188182,0.000088615925,0.00017830191,0.00013018699,0.000040415678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007202789,0.00009960489,0.00018523731,0.00040674573,0.0013447094,0.000087709086,0.000057358768,0.00026436523,0.000009385916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011593839,0.000062992905,0.00011428523,0.000029446335,0.00005822483,0.00004909064,0.116567805,1.361397e-7,0.00004194889,0.8702326,0.011403881,0.0014280425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611248,0.000034652207,0.0002899782,0.00003858371,0.00010674637,0.000016136812,0.03908816,0.000008709255,0.0000876741,0.93907726,0.020852672,0.00013828253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004404894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067584694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85042256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080206504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017780252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414399643","doi":"10.1177/01914537251380120","title":"Who are we when we are ‘Us, at Our Best?’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Dystopia; Interrogation; Persuasion; Politics; Task (project management); GRASP","score_opus":0.09235003326916522,"score_gpt":0.3831213933833595,"score_spread":0.29077136011419424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414399643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051635774,0.0039401585,0.000028071467,0.6439559,0.0025328,0.00034005562,0.000115696545,0.00025768022,0.34366608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492677,0.0022053304,0.00008738476,0.0106628295,0.005227689,0.000056236826,0.000009506687,0.000047135665,0.0324362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967762,0.00044767797,0.00042391496,0.00056441495,0.0009156182,0.0008721266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855345,0.00026092387,0.00017201106,0.00030522753,0.00045599652,0.00025239715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061010633,0.00032599954,0.000577628,0.00015342075,0.0031368437,0.00021574131,0.00068973,0.000611015,0.00022021552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006325806,0.0003642076,0.0003698138,0.0004509866,0.000727706,0.0003226666,0.000239687,0.00070871075,0.00041299206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045071774,0.00023420186,0.0019637751,0.000296831,0.000086277396,0.000055947654,0.05541051,0.0000011945776,0.000023031327,0.74769604,0.1928968,0.0012903046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030438066,0.000020081032,0.00046047146,0.00034003166,0.00007406667,4.2368936e-7,0.016947633,0.000002959427,0.000029473664,0.54993033,0.4315943,0.0002958366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008988282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003659232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94410414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045311768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033327806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}