{"meta":{"query_hash":"b551b66d04c7","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"},"cohort_total":31,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":31,"exported":31,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b551b66d04c7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophy+and+Rhetoric"},"results":[{"id":"W1550479137","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0107","title":"The Late Fourteenth-Century Renaissance of Anglo-Latin Rhetoric","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Vernacular; The Renaissance; Poetry; Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); Rhetorical question; Art; Classics; Middle Ages; The arts; History; Philosophy; Art history; Ancient history; Theology; Visual arts; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036429420607213873,"score_gpt":0.2253976647327588,"score_spread":0.18896824412554492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550479137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052453738,0.17698424,0.0000064414694,0.0012580195,0.009165948,0.00029866767,0.000048973216,0.00008875761,0.75969523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915046,0.001752053,0.000016313437,0.00014656509,0.003859785,0.0000125753395,0.000007659231,0.000016782275,0.0050378283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990696,0.000056269477,0.00025366916,0.00012271719,0.00021049185,0.00028728176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993052,0.00012144238,0.00015072378,0.00023180108,0.00007489953,0.00011593291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024835492,0.00015421586,0.00019415567,0.00006359144,0.0005810379,0.000046937486,0.00013532418,0.00004251189,0.00016199634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026374542,0.00009723932,0.00008262866,0.00006105628,0.00030344623,0.00023670004,0.000039093306,0.00017715378,0.000038570433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038779483,0.00006939393,0.0003664591,0.00007604282,0.000036972604,8.4090465e-7,0.020985596,1.5098698e-7,0.000056080695,0.9685042,0.0081017595,0.001763742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020416678,0.00005986941,0.0006574311,0.00004328012,0.000038152128,0.0000017336214,0.00018117325,0.000004623307,0.000026535263,0.008555448,0.9900812,0.00014642035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001561304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000104796545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025222875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013198829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44689327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663408855","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Identity (music); Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030197498571487784,"score_gpt":0.24827549038768768,"score_spread":0.21807799181619988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663408855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27372414,0.054721475,0.00007447193,0.040064506,0.002030058,0.0010559594,0.000014845358,0.00011144786,0.6282031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957052,0.002436766,0.00003302009,0.0002865405,0.00035857744,0.00005451147,0.0000017147848,0.000004837785,0.0011188249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944043,0.00005276414,0.00017590637,0.0001122877,0.0001295392,0.00008905418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994242,0.00018489546,0.00009589782,0.00015576762,0.00010895303,0.000030253275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011964765,0.00009046226,0.00016316943,0.00003480345,0.00042819502,0.000056009863,0.00010676698,0.00003864279,0.00011745811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027370737,0.000050258197,0.00003554351,0.00004685124,0.00063437776,0.0001770562,0.000083578874,0.00015352818,0.000014917155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013905434,0.000020094909,0.000227339,0.00001762564,0.000030550294,6.1131495e-8,0.013184626,1.1718872e-7,0.0000050735157,0.983286,0.0013836802,0.0018309287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001854826,0.0001396122,0.0062232646,0.000049424107,0.00008800307,0.000006005101,0.00687566,0.00019212218,0.00003239232,0.8549564,0.12930118,0.00028114684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008993568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004036275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72198105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008845471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054141865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32933733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189575033","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.2.0156","title":"The Absence of Rhetorical Theory in Richard Rorty's Linguistic Pragmatism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Rhetorical question; Linguistic turn; Rhetoric; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027691385268354036,"score_gpt":0.24296589979237052,"score_spread":0.21527451452401647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189575033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21549945,0.017726183,0.00016098983,0.01194484,0.008882657,0.0014441333,0.000032895492,0.00016719454,0.74414164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972897,0.0004920699,0.0000430477,0.000120802215,0.0013040835,0.000093198665,0.00000410809,0.000014146696,0.00063883484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.00012599971,0.00040152363,0.0002030974,0.0001953406,0.00023884773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987817,0.00060538726,0.00016592092,0.00025252427,0.00012192615,0.000072556584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039994981,0.00015864303,0.00020509785,0.000100040335,0.00039683987,0.00009976234,0.00021413693,0.00005594241,0.00023248282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026085204,0.00010514513,0.000053075204,0.0000983728,0.00037657,0.00024194425,0.00005422031,0.00021459893,0.00008985719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012592453,0.00007698409,0.00025536254,0.00005568991,0.000017036544,0.0000010759143,0.012929952,0.0000013828187,0.000014117489,0.9822708,0.0004982075,0.003866828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016822244,0.00006514422,0.0034038122,0.000073287316,0.000010771644,0.0000032905807,0.00037853018,0.00010158977,0.000014262819,0.98368055,0.011951838,0.0001487056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016896469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002027514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78179026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031877335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032782427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4287694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926220562","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0570","title":"Figural Logic in Gregor Mendel's “Experiments on Plant Hybrids”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Botanical Research and Chemistry","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Synecdoche; Antithesis; Philosophy; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Linguistics; Metonymy; Literature; Art; Law","score_opus":0.045143778500338745,"score_gpt":0.24728880297779737,"score_spread":0.20214502447745863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926220562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980329,0.0005476244,1.2276537e-7,0.0049132225,0.00005898613,0.00014009919,0.000020562127,0.000026138347,0.013964274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875295,0.00014411847,0.0000070116444,0.00053033937,0.00027229427,0.00003739946,0.000024008255,6.69836e-7,0.00023119927],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.00002911248,0.00012845402,0.00024842133,0.00018517756,0.0002898498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963003,0.00010653343,0.000025346622,0.000044160686,0.000017322882,0.00017661438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000061690145,0.00011525851,0.00012539189,0.000007185247,0.00009005872,0.00004043322,0.0001452773,0.00006709301,0.000529318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033845947,0.000040507784,0.000039782495,0.00013173884,0.000045749384,0.00008748866,0.000053263862,0.00016378931,0.00011201619],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003209682,0.0012591336,0.011008305,0.000065710476,0.000049103317,0.00011240935,0.00014254526,0.0000021928925,0.82407427,0.031147491,0.008644356,0.123173505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015976205,0.0024133984,0.24400516,0.00021231693,0.000010049249,0.000030164907,0.00021033884,0.00047244233,0.04723062,0.69147825,0.011150975,0.0011886633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008211805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007254674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77684367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026411266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029978246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5795661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008435593","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0054","title":"Guide(s) for the Perplexed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Consciousness; Sociology; Phenomenon; Social life; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17806483517252428,"score_gpt":0.29687968824305805,"score_spread":0.11881485307053377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008435593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008391057,0.030856676,0.00044659083,0.027505672,0.00221066,0.00044270055,0.000024962359,0.00012472818,0.9375489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736234,0.0007231817,0.000085369196,0.00061186904,0.0020805416,0.00012438714,0.0000041559115,0.000010782132,0.022736324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953926,0.000019686804,0.00013169125,0.00010237628,0.00009932161,0.00010767126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993413,0.00018555693,0.00004614264,0.00022438816,0.00015588048,0.000046718877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019693715,0.00008540001,0.000106110674,0.000022551138,0.00065849366,0.00007229091,0.0001644433,0.000016989668,0.000037250844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047953312,0.00004890827,0.00004779346,0.000025775198,0.00017987515,0.00008891241,0.000067644156,0.00005485913,0.00003101047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695548,0.000016614686,0.000022208866,0.000006174824,0.00003473122,8.993763e-8,0.01415426,8.395958e-7,5.151577e-7,0.9243725,0.058005724,0.003372664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025653894,0.000052015606,0.000025962549,0.000004202358,0.000024970863,0.0000010472885,0.0028620567,0.00006996314,0.000001077436,0.09859864,0.8980286,0.00007492922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006607903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024339002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015864896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017734337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50646675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059759980","doi":"10.1353/par.0.0000","title":"On Common Knowledge and &lt;i&gt;Ad Populum&lt;/i&gt;: Acceptance as Grounds for Acceptability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Nothing; Epistemology; Persuasion; Context (archaeology); Dialogic; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03908586551773882,"score_gpt":0.2801424699484467,"score_spread":0.2410566044307079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059759980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375536,0.010113505,0.0223757,0.0017047994,0.0030704185,0.0014212711,0.000030899642,0.00033237124,0.023397477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997323,0.00050021877,0.0011061125,0.00015392729,0.00040506924,0.00007826567,0.000009063392,0.00001737612,0.00040699597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826944,0.00010967298,0.00036607875,0.0006847802,0.00024877294,0.00032123757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998758,0.00023291499,0.00016680651,0.0005566417,0.00009639463,0.00018922916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032806458,0.0002696642,0.0003616135,0.00012863461,0.00065741176,0.000092661176,0.00040435354,0.00014173037,0.000016424552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061063845,0.00023620045,0.00010715919,0.0003204409,0.00009732086,0.0006175767,0.00016078279,0.00012525189,0.000036990117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114956834,0.00068400573,0.005412554,0.00033539988,0.00005995812,0.000011864244,0.003805861,0.00001088176,0.0018389582,0.94479823,0.0031214627,0.039805852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056578284,0.0019950753,0.46975085,0.00021616521,0.00007054556,0.0002129595,0.000019687177,0.027337266,0.0009825543,0.3540172,0.13778372,0.0019561637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011900945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002848224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59078103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087633576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003850961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9631974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096863564","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.45.2.0148","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic, and Logic as Related to Argument","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Argument map; Philosophy; Linguistics; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.031175810664643394,"score_gpt":0.3006801159728074,"score_spread":0.26950430530816405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096863564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62388873,0.01689965,0.00012788246,0.0020126845,0.0041371896,0.0004920446,0.000010143044,0.00015085687,0.35228083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532163,0.00028640233,0.00007336348,0.0009864946,0.0008648395,0.000068257046,0.000010222661,0.000022512606,0.0023662606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880016,0.00012349089,0.00021310528,0.00032421373,0.00015189308,0.0003871194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999294,0.000087146334,0.00006577775,0.00021355423,0.00003608977,0.00030344605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002617421,0.00019338077,0.0002193398,0.00014106462,0.00017095877,0.00002699284,0.00007140215,0.00015220423,0.0006793478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048583268,0.0001578132,0.00005061316,0.00028578026,0.000046861864,0.00013437407,0.000052569772,0.00017945298,0.0009275906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020863579,0.000576982,0.0067077884,0.0000495063,0.0002351054,0.000040666397,0.015802886,3.6009047e-7,0.00069094443,0.9561412,0.0019867173,0.017559249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036421895,0.0016845572,0.08559831,0.00008798892,0.0005163257,0.00064575335,0.0012310602,0.000005385825,0.00072775036,0.8335985,0.07083903,0.0014231484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044352004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011686489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37143293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036583664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074992777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322747704","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.43.4.0337","title":"Ways of Being Reasonable:","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Windsor; Rhetoric; Citation; Download; State (computer science); Publishing; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Algorithm; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0437671729541827,"score_gpt":0.2906555638302812,"score_spread":0.24688839087609848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322747704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0736593,0.0001314495,0.000048223297,0.058914334,0.00093399565,0.00017371777,0.000011047523,0.0001117128,0.8660162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567276,0.0000428804,0.00034877655,0.001345072,0.0024286825,0.000007181198,0.0000020377815,0.000012766181,0.00013982334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988203,0.00006207947,0.00019744544,0.00022170524,0.00033735725,0.0003610944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917257,0.0002105139,0.000066436354,0.00020692553,0.000105526786,0.00023802275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037180207,0.000112764086,0.00018623094,0.000089199566,0.0003824583,0.000026489206,0.00021604063,0.00017401097,0.00012871981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044174603,0.00010532558,0.000062148436,0.00031493537,0.0005567556,0.0002072205,0.000055724282,0.0003606411,0.00003440702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004787433,0.000035023208,0.0007758855,0.000021597889,0.000009069771,0.000005478397,0.0016142491,9.7620074e-8,0.00052544114,0.9958865,0.0004120696,0.00070979097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013603226,0.000037434773,0.00041047262,0.000015095062,0.000014554433,0.0000020132413,0.000047845493,0.00000510501,0.00030025182,0.93614256,0.06275474,0.00013387711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031727573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029264907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92201346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019861518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008066034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42950523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768152958","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0528","title":"On Rhetoric and the School of Philosophy Without Tears","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Philosophy; Transitive relation; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.06001572697176672,"score_gpt":0.27465377199035973,"score_spread":0.21463804501859302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768152958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07995539,0.0029934216,0.0000053453346,0.020104392,0.003247462,0.0005374218,0.00008565269,0.00008680646,0.8929841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213547,0.0007591744,0.0000151243385,0.0007865603,0.0042554764,0.000029547591,0.000004176053,0.000037452053,0.0019770055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983589,0.0001181135,0.0003992286,0.00042824374,0.00040238077,0.00029310235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981799,0.00021977042,0.0004110142,0.0008533989,0.00015361374,0.00018230706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231589,0.0003263167,0.0005361856,0.0001421899,0.0020627943,0.00037023696,0.0004941103,0.000128366,0.0001494494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028729608,0.00021177917,0.0001747061,0.000030404282,0.0027020252,0.00040216153,0.000197702,0.000495073,0.00008034693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033567223,0.0000783274,0.00021791637,0.00013622771,0.00011162703,0.0000042636143,0.005199103,7.1772735e-7,0.000010164879,0.99299896,0.00064537994,0.00026163488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024523,0.00021999069,0.0007508908,0.00018344393,0.000116308096,0.000008176315,0.00010666754,0.000035994333,0.000015907926,0.9773861,0.018418096,0.00030613158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002363161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027604683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91218007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023613575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037194863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769221086","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0566","title":"Replicating Reasons: Arguments, Memes, and the Cognitive Environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Persuasion; Epistemology; Cognition; Memetics; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031891469611813585,"score_gpt":0.2912759381567086,"score_spread":0.259384468544895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769221086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32849362,0.03513176,0.00048257672,0.009146448,0.0011327586,0.0012966621,0.00007517797,0.00009294076,0.6241481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965608,0.0013377042,0.000038694136,0.0004348467,0.00049061177,0.00013293198,0.000010858913,0.00001267842,0.0009808375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911654,0.00011927919,0.00014423522,0.00034025108,0.000114626586,0.00016506828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914175,0.00015451625,0.00018271637,0.00044083528,0.00001582769,0.0000643707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036412207,0.00012893682,0.00016351932,0.000025295067,0.0007345332,0.00007524919,0.00012854129,0.00006613349,0.00015477333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104299186,0.00008296291,0.000044613425,0.000020879477,0.00034764764,0.00009284543,0.00009597673,0.0001441464,0.00008379025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000903895,0.00034054669,0.008475636,0.00006387131,0.00066790555,0.000056638288,0.012511134,7.386732e-8,0.00010954719,0.8015508,0.0007579312,0.17456204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015983585,0.00040349676,0.16928151,0.0002917198,0.0010450494,0.0002502664,0.0038852142,0.00004258947,0.00032774586,0.785852,0.02168084,0.00095593464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009313538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013628071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6680672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009709394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037500263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56495094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891414723","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.51.3.0269","title":"Designing Soundscapes for Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Soundscape; Argumentative; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Normative; Epistemology; Sound (geography); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History; Acoustics","score_opus":0.08313284929350859,"score_gpt":0.2801152351405932,"score_spread":0.19698238584708463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891414723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028015535,0.008420079,0.017868597,0.007377477,0.0037759691,0.0009183808,0.00003819726,0.00038553146,0.93320024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945315,0.00017315123,0.00070132525,0.00024990484,0.0023130956,0.00006681685,0.0000065885333,0.000009223421,0.0019483765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956805,0.000017138245,0.00012182034,0.00011964222,0.00006598857,0.00010734133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960387,0.000092063136,0.000056642686,0.00009867883,0.000122044046,0.000026684282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000093309485,0.00008117992,0.0000959011,0.00004452669,0.00090346695,0.00007652495,0.00007305923,0.000017417873,0.000092264716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014161831,0.000066313296,0.000033385142,0.000026084417,0.00018499838,0.00015092855,0.000029214945,0.000032704593,0.00003812854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020411939,0.000022880746,0.00006573033,0.00001668817,0.000034986624,5.4677514e-8,0.020477997,1.0041183e-7,0.000049337825,0.9734203,0.0032134652,0.0026780162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049282983,0.00029757776,0.000094002695,0.00002506108,0.00004633077,0.0000012989456,0.0033767598,0.00008254523,0.0002659057,0.41150182,0.5836053,0.00021056294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009005341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001053026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96651596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000123194295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006480232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69488287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939457100","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.52.1.0078","title":"<i>Combat–Débat</i>: Parataxis and the Unavowable Community; or, The Joke","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"French Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Trope (literature); Politics; Identity (music); Presidency; Alterity; Sociology; Subordination (linguistics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.0282866409356068,"score_gpt":0.21241716224193335,"score_spread":0.18413052130632657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939457100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09843151,0.024618082,0.0000039654888,0.019938158,0.0019260993,0.00070539815,0.00006041129,0.00008971185,0.85422665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771336,0.00053859927,0.0000043556533,0.0032088647,0.0007708738,0.000026622585,0.000009544495,0.000012397611,0.018295147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914104,0.00022000712,0.00016796222,0.00013882783,0.00013778792,0.00019437422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989089,0.0005362786,0.000049276296,0.00040456647,0.000053531705,0.00004746237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003697281,0.00016378041,0.00021396534,0.000032465432,0.001193714,0.0003644652,0.00023668596,0.000043334276,0.00038284832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021952545,0.00006203834,0.000054601267,0.00005580442,0.0006356954,0.00021619257,0.00010433654,0.00044314592,0.000063553765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007661834,0.000037044076,0.000036719448,0.0000622938,0.00003751098,0.0000017034126,0.02522919,3.6813105e-7,0.000004318812,0.968995,0.005050411,0.00046884426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010267285,0.00017279299,0.00009556561,0.00005349017,0.000050676852,0.000016646443,0.0017692546,0.000033024342,0.000007524796,0.29343805,0.7031825,0.00015374231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038325676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000163461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060657176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012537826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9181204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037169852","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0299","title":"The Suicidal State: In Advance of an American Requiem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Racism; State of exception; Writ; State (computer science); Criminology; Context (archaeology); Biosocial theory; Sociology; Racialization; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Politics; Law; Psychoanalysis; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.01224720338316971,"score_gpt":0.2551643427118993,"score_spread":0.2429171393287296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037169852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945546,0.0031473406,0.00014516071,0.0011013189,0.00007757055,0.000085665124,0.000012207612,0.0000051600377,0.00087096746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963615,0.0027081678,0.00024031269,0.00034411394,0.00028484676,0.0000049267856,0.000009752015,0.000010103125,0.000036309164],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993702,0.00004649259,0.00014819976,0.0002167191,0.00007778557,0.00014056487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962765,0.00001283985,0.00007098084,0.00017750903,0.000031027277,0.00007998787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000091735965,0.0000855233,0.00011435876,0.000007617699,0.00007163598,0.000008590376,0.00012872982,0.00003621518,7.145562e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037442045,0.00006589715,0.000038940438,0.00010810638,0.00021585547,0.0000034997945,0.000053132873,0.00007276987,7.798545e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021374437,0.0006045677,0.06663846,0.00032061522,0.0002893264,0.000026755362,0.012034903,0.0014555007,0.78625625,0.014566819,0.00149737,0.11417199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008846431,0.017572137,0.14597252,0.00008439063,0.00012781828,0.00003966318,0.005808313,0.0038782055,0.47618553,0.10524365,0.23302816,0.0032131895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023665398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003187211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31007072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000045159877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024655355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26872078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038055792","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326","title":"The Moral Sense in the Time of the Recluse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recluse; Rhetoric; Darwin (ADL); Environmental ethics; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Poetry","score_opus":0.06630831190702248,"score_gpt":0.2260373133054254,"score_spread":0.1597290013984029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038055792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14018363,0.0036827463,0.0000012456599,0.5139025,0.0012140117,0.00068932166,0.00012264014,0.000053948606,0.34015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926667,0.00012621334,0.0000017606584,0.004998533,0.001824999,0.0000080344025,0.0000020087066,0.000008367288,0.0003633468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902034,0.00019803253,0.00022572784,0.00014396744,0.00022133662,0.00019058744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929166,0.00034390463,0.000059767583,0.00021398687,0.000029354007,0.000061326515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018286367,0.00011853795,0.00014473825,0.000012766914,0.0004114571,0.00005944024,0.00026687776,0.000033792527,0.00010172815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008275334,0.00004720006,0.00010790112,0.000100027275,0.0004611201,0.00006069924,0.00009260085,0.00025500258,0.000045517387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044460292,0.00004740509,0.000070246584,0.000019792884,0.000014319749,0.000003308379,0.00741346,9.635016e-7,0.000008357198,0.9908255,0.0013576341,0.0001945549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031986326,0.00011192808,0.00047240502,0.000029159697,0.00003051656,0.000005179984,0.00028687817,0.00015439923,0.00003060391,0.70938545,0.28905517,0.00011842963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021694084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005717266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075257926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010566445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31646368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144331134","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0026","title":"Classifying the Patterns of Natural Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Abstraction; Dialectic; Natural (archaeology); Rhetorical question; Representation (politics); Computer science; Argument map; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.061922752016709444,"score_gpt":0.26467909075392243,"score_spread":0.202756338737213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144331134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84866035,0.0067374185,0.11336829,0.00917214,0.009874572,0.00077686866,0.000009609703,0.00019700645,0.011203766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.000026397413,0.00023418876,0.00008687194,0.00020604387,0.000004365712,9.469009e-7,0.000002739452,0.00008400245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999396,0.000047294117,0.00013501343,0.00013453087,0.0001959723,0.00009117788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995843,0.000030368063,0.00009262183,0.00020068546,0.000043441632,0.00004859508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018405882,0.0000648731,0.00008526605,0.000036683832,0.00006845728,0.00003216181,0.00023142147,0.000024289355,0.0000010260812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012935181,0.000039042287,0.000027434804,0.00010808084,0.000012164368,0.00021504423,0.000089594745,0.00006409294,0.000007157895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024409763,0.00020271417,0.09427013,0.00023836017,0.00011245186,0.000011352905,0.011532808,0.000059258884,0.0015203655,0.86599076,0.0013121422,0.024725279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008970591,0.0009957209,0.4454331,0.00090290315,0.00011785549,0.00018014765,0.0006817928,0.22050127,0.008668357,0.2724776,0.03906811,0.0020025377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031807052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014378852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59351313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017160188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012488471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15920982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176353597","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0109","title":"Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Law and economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.12006824338450683,"score_gpt":0.2821851329781331,"score_spread":0.16211688959362625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176353597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1987961,0.02752005,0.00029966573,0.012698656,0.002074276,0.00075101235,0.00023110463,0.000084119514,0.757545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543136,0.0014330627,0.00007074618,0.0002789967,0.0011395535,0.000014295706,0.0000066056014,0.000012170847,0.001613197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942195,0.000048329577,0.00016050015,0.00016203479,0.00008044597,0.00012675904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.00029412328,0.00007792765,0.00014586377,0.00013301655,0.000034733785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002066445,0.0001026065,0.0002032579,0.000017764678,0.00035309515,0.00004752143,0.00006793224,0.000049846512,0.000021339043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031420695,0.000067686335,0.000069714944,0.000024525994,0.00029603785,0.00008051359,0.00004087311,0.00012613242,0.0000013315404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016375354,0.000035580888,0.00007266035,0.00019157697,0.0000727957,0.0000010977794,0.033044726,7.7586515e-7,0.000106661755,0.9651049,0.00026977522,0.001083114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484925,0.00013077195,0.00012804513,0.00011759426,0.00014281573,0.000007510947,0.0064236703,0.00010637832,0.0006881587,0.90529007,0.08622849,0.00018802448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038532224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004952906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79663527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004552471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025694593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27601686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224075577","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0066","title":"Mind the Gap: <i>Kairos</i> in the Spaces of Silence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Silence; Order (exchange); Moment (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.047944730514601894,"score_gpt":0.23247748433427445,"score_spread":0.18453275381967255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224075577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83231276,0.0034434618,0.000003406089,0.0081348205,0.00029990778,0.0001631704,0.000060612816,0.000007514588,0.15557435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791956,0.00005617066,0.0000014010052,0.0003655856,0.00031025778,0.000023562214,0.0000025728702,0.0000033777055,0.0013175304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929196,0.00022405722,0.00012688135,0.00010541841,0.00016258437,0.00008912278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995736,0.00018552964,0.00007363811,0.00013951007,0.000016619837,0.000011086246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042388815,0.000072269024,0.000111040565,0.00005230957,0.0006284957,0.000035345158,0.00021451165,0.000007610018,0.000805582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001012919,0.000036807134,0.000056763405,0.00011539162,0.00027937177,0.00006832228,0.00005310061,0.0001519389,0.000004048446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023758823,0.00007307196,0.00017080626,0.000010649208,0.00001784393,0.0000033972524,0.078846544,0.000020403453,0.00006439788,0.91998476,0.00031312357,0.00047122792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042403286,0.00032996575,0.0002773288,0.00002328032,0.00009286125,0.000010398802,0.112683326,0.000087249864,0.000158351,0.6719926,0.2136853,0.0002353211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054369266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002999567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24799219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066287153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000816891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88205576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243244020","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.2.0233","title":"Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.21426168424387784,"score_gpt":0.2766817939204269,"score_spread":0.06242010967654907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243244020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08009256,0.02653337,0.00024795215,0.02324862,0.0018471469,0.00028575788,0.000015577709,0.00031676388,0.86741227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554044,0.0007803571,0.00007874865,0.00037457512,0.0012538825,0.000027412338,0.000009002536,0.00001252255,0.0019230543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918777,0.00006940859,0.00019494498,0.00019394998,0.0001817191,0.00017220242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00008110803,0.000062686224,0.00018963516,0.00019147737,0.00018330562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018192126,0.00013928814,0.00017717703,0.000080392056,0.0005147642,0.00020321339,0.00009643198,0.000044029148,0.000041126215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006872016,0.000111844114,0.000028698081,0.000061131796,0.00024543135,0.00022832658,0.00011154044,0.00012429098,0.000041326115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113243905,0.000029312541,0.0005597947,0.000010593126,0.000031893665,9.73253e-7,0.007823907,1.2786624e-7,0.0000013037886,0.9788682,0.009346076,0.0033164993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075379026,0.0001790492,0.00046485948,0.000016337404,0.00003621835,0.000016553107,0.0026542293,0.00010721113,0.0000030058186,0.5675015,0.42793757,0.0003297175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018375438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011090059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9154479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034175537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002408827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45608708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321509394","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.4.0386","title":"The Erotic Madness of Writing in Plato’s <i>Phaedrus</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Analogy; Possessive; Literature; Philosophy; Function (biology); Orientation (vector space); Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029647640735188517,"score_gpt":0.21632852359484486,"score_spread":0.18668088285965634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321509394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30215487,0.010080383,0.0000037411032,0.016378572,0.003138186,0.0006076938,0.00015656813,0.00010325818,0.66737676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982706,0.00008553327,0.000002800062,0.0002385028,0.00081209984,0.00005237921,0.000005182621,0.00001438981,0.000518532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989446,0.00009796603,0.00032558964,0.00018748292,0.00023543516,0.00020891664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934816,0.00030198114,0.00010642521,0.00017041527,0.00002826282,0.000044738696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032175388,0.00012195187,0.0001920582,0.00008077357,0.0010001385,0.000048495396,0.00020064496,0.000020341718,0.000156156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020895255,0.00008965564,0.000073149895,0.00012286054,0.00028078147,0.000105868974,0.00017154859,0.0002648021,0.0000044247313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051592036,0.000100264275,0.00019141588,0.00003964296,0.000015491927,0.000009243877,0.0034536577,0.000013721877,0.000018416475,0.9944949,0.00029231314,0.0013193074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058088085,0.00014341637,0.0001849267,0.000031695316,0.000018420622,0.000009023663,0.0011987516,0.0001155641,0.000041290376,0.8209449,0.17654347,0.00018768043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040176852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045684577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69611573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032431148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001855786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7692358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385464282","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.2.0199","title":"Violent Inheritance: Sexuality, Land, and Energy in Making the North American West","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Human sexuality; Sociology; Queer; Aesthetics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Suspect; Materialism; Gender studies; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03952458556388738,"score_gpt":0.3133172136242772,"score_spread":0.27379262806038984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385464282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8879727,0.0027253176,0.000027161776,0.025816083,0.00042586285,0.00015100767,0.0000112800735,0.00017998258,0.08269062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435526,0.0046099587,0.000023660714,0.0004822499,0.00036097565,0.000020377693,0.0000014417708,0.000005968494,0.00014009837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991383,0.00014389098,0.00012351193,0.00018837702,0.00017619996,0.00022975264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960065,0.0001678717,0.00006861909,0.000096243326,0.00001832078,0.000048305807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023439425,0.00008966164,0.00015673976,0.000056484743,0.00048543813,0.000046252473,0.00011096084,0.000018786135,0.000004252505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004651508,0.00006194649,0.000017795312,0.00096028537,0.00049429695,0.00007591306,0.00011500619,0.00008576951,0.000003944259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008890151,0.000025791602,0.80753684,0.000016778024,0.00001845028,0.000010833939,0.017169064,0.00000654993,0.0000011792542,0.12356266,0.00023771838,0.051405232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018051494,0.000060243903,0.9504067,0.00002255709,0.000008462601,0.0000011420261,0.0032260914,0.000091498965,3.02948e-7,0.016151544,0.029656677,0.00019431453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002735548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006242328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1428698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027165635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002318347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41353485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392845246","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.56.3-4.0274","title":"<i>Kairos</i> , The Sire of Beauty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kairos; Beauty; Rhetoric; Harmony (color); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Intuition; Antinomy; Art; Theology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05204658885694838,"score_gpt":0.22983400423240308,"score_spread":0.1777874153754547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392845246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07318209,0.0016689041,0.0000037373118,0.030483628,0.0022710112,0.00029365672,0.0001279857,0.00029317284,0.89167583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994509,0.0001743528,0.0000024378403,0.00039372372,0.0023743687,0.000013581992,0.0000107262495,0.000014161371,0.002507679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992243,0.000034992427,0.00019641365,0.00016971781,0.00017991685,0.00019463297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994377,0.00017657001,0.00007090854,0.00021206171,0.000042912034,0.000059836897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015614052,0.00012429948,0.00017440281,0.000064754204,0.0004204437,0.00003972815,0.00015663565,0.000038312242,0.00013385991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027479551,0.00007443655,0.00010043425,0.00014989122,0.00045117617,0.000106524414,0.000077439414,0.0001441001,0.000121892976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014427944,0.000036817808,0.000044092165,0.000047614554,0.00002636367,0.0000033930808,0.0040529203,0.0000017466119,0.000038005743,0.9901349,0.0045373277,0.001062412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018728583,0.00006754763,0.00031353591,0.000025536452,0.000026499243,0.0000015311452,0.00016815652,0.000046619516,0.000066374,0.69070697,0.30827808,0.00011183425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019785632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014229577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007288543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011057008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32337555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580755","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0030","title":"Figuring the Topos: Finding Common Ground in Cognitive Environments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Narrative Theory and Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Topos theory; Figuring; Common ground; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Art; Psychology; Communication; Astronomy; Literature","score_opus":0.05827019360311416,"score_gpt":0.2696944171496502,"score_spread":0.21142422354653603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400580755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70947695,0.0073363213,0.000026887219,0.0016971759,0.00059042714,0.00018601856,0.000033173594,0.000049419166,0.2806036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501485,0.0001842551,7.8745984e-7,0.0001299901,0.00072141015,0.000015095853,0.000008286282,0.000008647803,0.003916653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999422,0.000071839946,0.00012834078,0.00016636212,0.00008700149,0.00012445342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996787,0.00020618903,0.000022688191,0.00006433108,0.000004010528,0.00002413718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018335265,0.000104954845,0.000118839285,0.00009578539,0.00036591722,0.00015550132,0.00006701591,0.000021246893,0.0005193898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071053923,0.00006685676,0.000053591797,0.00006547052,0.00017285487,0.0002144069,0.000035132354,0.00017409066,0.00005822554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015975851,0.00003519506,0.00017752573,0.00003338545,0.00007545981,0.000026130165,0.030286048,0.0000026077814,0.000039607137,0.96614563,0.000033909368,0.0031285377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004356564,0.0001327151,0.0011578782,0.0005829146,0.00017362846,0.000008254469,0.008428724,0.00043419568,0.00020020448,0.91121686,0.0768242,0.00040474726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032218708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044567314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2855379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002491321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003885005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5686954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400580875","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.1.0103","title":"<i>Logos</i> in the Flux of Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Flux (metallurgy); Philosophy; Chemistry; Theology","score_opus":0.041140674694320256,"score_gpt":0.29568973838473794,"score_spread":0.2545490636904177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400580875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14550349,0.03446384,0.0000372289,0.015802078,0.0030293658,0.0002700828,0.0000249726,0.00008337769,0.80078554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978817,0.00009029058,0.000009846661,0.0009669688,0.0007429002,0.00003044288,0.000006950082,0.000011438661,0.00025945148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999094,0.00012967424,0.00023767789,0.00025162095,0.00009899301,0.0001880184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994879,0.0001737181,0.00003383881,0.00024904497,0.000011726373,0.000043808093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002817442,0.00011841208,0.00018447611,0.00014950414,0.000058447917,0.000014416841,0.00020343626,0.00011231548,0.00019063466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016755468,0.0000797438,0.000066234345,0.00038913882,0.00017302576,0.00006799341,0.000036735117,0.00027999366,0.00020772977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006494442,0.00012323137,0.00055370457,0.000077779936,0.0000758678,0.000042249674,0.0036698105,0.0000011671028,0.00007524147,0.9913739,0.0028043862,0.0011377487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000429301,0.00020816035,0.005610148,0.000044234435,0.00004161823,0.000037351914,0.00018947183,0.0000128376505,0.000010084558,0.96947676,0.023791598,0.00014846015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023905062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015826851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8523782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008315105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017997249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32518578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234122","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0333","title":"Sophisms and Contempt for Autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Autonomy; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09365532945548626,"score_gpt":0.2821873199907969,"score_spread":0.1885319905353106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046159826,0.11647061,0.0012255857,0.044511903,0.017423654,0.0015784305,0.00040107884,0.000855135,0.77137375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886908,0.0002642025,0.0000750446,0.000491511,0.0032753274,0.00004753842,0.000011615996,0.00002007774,0.007123878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938685,0.000020614592,0.0001464362,0.00024060269,0.00005686968,0.00014861902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995592,0.00021216176,0.000027084636,0.000092212475,0.000047382004,0.00006195904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017306674,0.00012757734,0.00018301616,0.00006712498,0.00029725803,0.0001474383,0.000048804064,0.000060950213,0.00003436248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013869305,0.00010083363,0.00006954242,0.000019757146,0.00034077556,0.00016745864,0.000023991097,0.00013930254,0.000017015822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009085036,0.000015283586,0.000011664521,0.00032720718,0.000055848457,0.0000029275818,0.012358067,9.555494e-8,0.000020729609,0.9835312,0.0010270606,0.002640829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014595942,0.000087406625,0.0000111310865,0.000041118885,0.000040484323,0.0000033576816,0.00014691277,0.00008912605,0.000014310233,0.5044408,0.49487576,0.00010367365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021514052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001304228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014635384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040064213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41118765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234222","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0270","title":"Autonomy and Argumentation: An Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Autonomy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04752464318364486,"score_gpt":0.34201969988472425,"score_spread":0.2944950567010794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081665754,0.007739555,0.0004884868,0.4955848,0.005566897,0.00042891223,0.000021514734,0.000716664,0.4077874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991873,0.00033211446,0.00012308701,0.000352781,0.0068801874,0.000008352627,0.000005756601,0.0000067635965,0.00041794655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992426,0.00009122018,0.00010149331,0.00024696038,0.00014884262,0.00016889739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996187,0.00008851082,0.000012421752,0.00007500667,0.000026313177,0.00017902719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036819425,0.000075844626,0.00007805303,0.000066619665,0.00045764688,0.00015419796,0.00004918642,0.0000898961,0.000050408424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047617443,0.00006982327,0.000020417741,0.00017741916,0.00033631714,0.00054995273,0.00001846377,0.00017257349,0.000021403017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000377903,0.000015324464,0.00003574454,0.000035346548,0.000009152939,0.0000027676585,0.0057663256,5.8852294e-7,0.000013860936,0.9902371,0.00013976192,0.0037402585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052442883,0.00004682677,0.00019171555,0.000010293934,0.000017423028,0.0000035923877,0.00019118043,0.00007118559,0.000016394271,0.8288983,0.17041029,0.00009035486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008681253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009928772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062703744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090089416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3519896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408997826","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.55.1.0076","title":"Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative Cruelty","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Silence; Argumentative; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.14589058305593364,"score_gpt":0.33818403822338533,"score_spread":0.1922934551674517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408997826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098738566,0.13622084,0.000059000373,0.13878927,0.0053152945,0.001288152,0.0003660889,0.00022848895,0.6189943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98449594,0.00068410765,0.000020646516,0.0011569628,0.00023757543,0.0002004838,0.0000028404338,0.0000058728933,0.013195584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983508,0.0007222181,0.00011535403,0.0002573315,0.00032374653,0.00023056818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992508,0.00042769432,0.00009110182,0.00014201284,0.000030326873,0.000058047637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094460114,0.000113386544,0.00019599235,0.000032712145,0.005878789,0.000015250369,0.00022468338,0.000033539534,0.00068127405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006598912,0.00007814296,0.00010481156,0.0002293654,0.0007358788,0.00006808594,0.0002813561,0.0002451341,0.000028303515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011813193,0.00015520975,0.003503613,0.0000327174,0.0014407976,0.00003677176,0.28960416,0.000019238816,0.000021643697,0.65875083,0.04458517,0.0017317063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004822685,0.00024916462,0.012685995,0.0000050181075,0.00070959184,0.000018062576,0.042927988,0.0000037712975,0.000037546703,0.19185033,0.75060487,0.00042536642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017741586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013197814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013222636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006014836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414466736","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.1.0069","title":"Normative Pluralism and the Other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Perspective (graphical); Pluralism (philosophy); Modal; Ethical theories","score_opus":0.02072143016879495,"score_gpt":0.30665984885294684,"score_spread":0.2859384186841519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414466736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005411052,0.0019578214,0.00006471537,0.16051866,0.0004662341,0.00028388522,0.000010893811,0.000064391235,0.83122236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356496,0.00022710863,0.000027642314,0.004271095,0.00067271205,0.000022953804,6.1079623e-7,0.000005660388,0.0012072376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989886,0.00026920767,0.0001481749,0.00017399936,0.00017714719,0.0002428644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924076,0.0004255503,0.000038240505,0.00013551944,0.00005081711,0.00010909071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004388624,0.000108120956,0.00016854756,0.000070598566,0.00074921787,0.000075396296,0.00015793837,0.00007682482,0.000036895868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002258831,0.00006953057,0.000047083613,0.00028409253,0.0012864895,0.00016410288,0.000080205005,0.00015721947,0.000026571632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024666606,0.000012523753,0.00014531358,0.000011239145,0.000023994653,7.239294e-7,0.007198868,1.8133835e-7,0.0000013782706,0.99133646,0.0004577921,0.0007868741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000578339,0.000010547172,0.00033856585,0.000025421996,0.000022875874,4.5928536e-7,0.00030293764,0.0000135784085,0.000008007581,0.9084719,0.090141006,0.00008640662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078328326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000471908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98815393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034935474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044701144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57624537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128779945","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0258","title":"The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Audience measurement; Craft","score_opus":0.08286538395446588,"score_gpt":0.29377401866135644,"score_spread":0.21090863470689056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128779945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80147326,0.072618395,0.00022832218,0.046425175,0.0010882075,0.0012968032,0.00015239575,0.000106868174,0.07661055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990231,0.007712607,0.000055655553,0.00013592387,0.000153978,0.000019278834,0.000009544107,0.0000063326347,0.0016757072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992202,0.00005739659,0.0002909087,0.00017180972,0.00013803397,0.00012164582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988761,0.000722968,0.00009815218,0.00015579157,0.00010755157,0.000039460272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013330177,0.00014464912,0.00022529569,0.00008449781,0.00094820134,0.00009509922,0.000097872864,0.000036023885,0.00001530946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006317551,0.000099628895,0.000035068995,0.000115476476,0.00072834163,0.0001565314,0.00008423513,0.00012995876,7.796637e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078417885,0.000056526398,0.00045366073,0.000056662255,0.00012938412,8.684406e-8,0.06440258,4.363808e-7,0.000013153498,0.9220243,0.0020204592,0.010764337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016037988,0.00050617073,0.004829714,0.00020556967,0.00022016434,0.000007308654,0.016994879,0.00028447306,0.00011387288,0.12182497,0.8530731,0.00033598396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005028154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003095251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85105264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003292819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005744707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128780135","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0159","title":"Dialectic, Dialogue, and Difference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Western thought","score_opus":0.0415909414146712,"score_gpt":0.24640013927792512,"score_spread":0.2048091978632539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128780135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03988337,0.025448661,0.000114671006,0.0076574693,0.0012278398,0.00017019585,0.000011331051,0.00011788458,0.92536855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873956,0.0034618413,0.000015531368,0.0004416023,0.00032894633,0.000026104824,0.0000022159584,0.000004274948,0.008323883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995374,0.000031245625,0.00012187822,0.00014732714,0.000058033354,0.00010409345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995944,0.00013717808,0.000032720873,0.00015771139,0.000045940764,0.000032061314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054176315,0.00010097413,0.00015071024,0.00006908435,0.00059414445,0.00008004964,0.000085226166,0.000024574687,0.000033304554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024923858,0.00007820934,0.000023305898,0.000049716273,0.00026522647,0.00006803747,0.00011725225,0.000090617046,0.000009016944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008077881,0.00002651911,0.0010324686,0.000027822673,0.000032825843,3.3914782e-7,0.005117489,2.6198638e-8,0.000005050211,0.9865057,0.0009066497,0.006337028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003863841,0.00006098413,0.009041468,0.000054490545,0.000053825475,0.0000013692458,0.00063824415,0.00002342014,0.000009005982,0.6116409,0.37788838,0.00020154958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056478308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035537974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010396501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010419181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45697388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163034977","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.3.0267","title":"Standing on a Bridge Between Cultures: Translation and Argumentation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Metaphor; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Bridge (graph theory); Bridging (networking); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.06644373872172389,"score_gpt":0.31744889026988043,"score_spread":0.25100515154815656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163034977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18256192,0.011693727,0.00033513206,0.0067626396,0.0005891888,0.00033537252,0.000084638516,0.00011004054,0.7975273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820113,0.00031416738,0.000015862812,0.00015717093,0.00056927564,0.000008729409,0.000018247894,0.0000044446365,0.0007109586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995367,0.000021730935,0.00011663937,0.00015236689,0.000091040114,0.00008154046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998063,0.00006198097,0.000035048375,0.000055069497,0.000022278255,0.000019325187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007035327,0.00009254447,0.00013179136,0.00011624715,0.00037421,0.00009813312,0.000029999495,0.000019769028,0.000038117454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008176402,0.000070963324,0.000031338517,0.000048296683,0.00010206572,0.00013545218,0.0000121428175,0.00005961239,0.0000034472134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016299897,0.00002473635,0.0010139679,0.00006616096,0.00019379353,0.0000012328727,0.026843755,0.000001473309,0.000011504786,0.9528521,0.0005834941,0.018391492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033144264,0.0005448142,0.023160268,0.0009523521,0.0017936622,0.0000015252537,0.016674647,0.00020071279,0.00030582838,0.7771732,0.17479573,0.0010828447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029402625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003972698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016213125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039158444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28938004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89977932","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0533","title":"The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Target audience; Perspective (graphical); Audience reception; Function (biology); Audience analysis; Audience participation; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Media studies; Advertising; Philosophy; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0200355414744477,"score_gpt":0.2300781494553129,"score_spread":0.21004260798086521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89977932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69844157,0.005551395,0.000006307384,0.010139439,0.00067827175,0.00042895315,0.000026676327,0.000013386978,0.284714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922496,0.00026296685,0.000014663971,0.000089835965,0.00033226886,0.000031984648,0.0000035273804,0.000002764399,0.000037001406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949694,0.00003717825,0.00019771725,0.000077539466,0.000103922626,0.00008668053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994048,0.00023332475,0.00013820286,0.00011601332,0.00009237837,0.0000153071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109032866,0.00006506515,0.00008557539,0.000029805462,0.00021991762,0.000034830915,0.00012671061,0.000019858524,0.000097164695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038277758,0.00003506108,0.000026982572,0.00005057591,0.00029167417,0.00031994868,0.00002882761,0.00008041859,0.000012062133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010253018,0.0000313757,0.0008001258,0.0000049960554,0.0000117225045,2.70172e-8,0.05508204,0.0000027627698,0.00005177058,0.9419203,0.000037141108,0.0020474733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010612391,0.000051161343,0.015206403,0.000020926938,0.000008357186,2.380718e-7,0.014334787,0.000086721106,0.00013201546,0.96918494,0.0008222626,0.00004607673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017338087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009587068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30078343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015804879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016157077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26210117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}