{"meta":{"query_hash":"384bf4616681","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences"},"cohort_total":94,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":94,"exported":94,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/384bf4616681","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophy+of+the+Social+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1968804489","doi":"10.1177/0048393104266860","title":"Clarifying Some Misunderstandings about Social Systems and their Mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09964198033789998,"score_gpt":0.2597748134622898,"score_spread":0.16013283312438983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968804489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.801175,0.003296023,0.0049200044,0.024366315,0.002567408,0.00046189674,0.00029826842,0.0000662042,0.16284889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992308,0.000043915425,0.000060720806,0.00028264496,0.00033428692,0.0000055639225,5.043493e-7,0.0000052405144,0.000036297075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919754,0.000019088562,0.0003129698,0.00023569036,0.000035391753,0.00019930338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995366,0.000025322943,0.00032526196,0.000076494005,0.000010453158,0.000025913228],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007593867,0.00010167975,0.0002528818,0.00007780885,0.0018027622,0.000091601374,0.00038023593,0.00009112707,0.000013175089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031119598,0.000082562896,0.00013424536,0.00019669328,0.0011329419,0.0003928736,0.000085676314,0.00011536798,0.00001299508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025672527,0.000017903967,0.00017994404,0.000016321543,0.00001632332,5.8336855e-8,0.002732767,0.000056402077,0.00009317013,0.9968492,0.000013844035,0.00002152666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021391452,0.000023361794,0.0007572054,0.00001860437,0.0000036120416,0.0000013858878,0.0010852477,0.00004347646,0.00019907461,0.99716234,0.00038049984,0.00011128265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016877922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065433046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19805583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010325344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003770657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970662364","doi":"10.1177/004931032002007","title":"Book Review: Popper’s Open Society after 50 Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Open society; Relevance (law); Karl popper; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical rationalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541793923242905,"score_gpt":0.28128497655856555,"score_spread":0.20586703732613648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970662364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0167786,0.30790094,0.0000012719971,0.2016179,0.0016734861,0.001202992,0.00012146654,0.00004868998,0.47065464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97042006,0.0037355102,0.00004360572,0.019997437,0.0007983572,0.000026966274,2.7325282e-7,0.000008253924,0.0049695075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838614,0.000109307555,0.00034180537,0.00027172003,0.000640459,0.0002505497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991464,0.00008709013,0.00037553508,0.00026200066,0.00009854302,0.000030419667],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008398271,0.00013374627,0.00029012107,0.00002329794,0.0009606111,0.00011141729,0.00215211,0.000034176323,0.0018954122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006896683,0.00007806662,0.0003474542,0.0001730208,0.006402727,0.0007255846,0.00034530438,0.0001652716,0.000030566993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019009218,0.00017549441,0.00009401136,0.0002503595,0.000043180902,7.103787e-7,0.16443567,0.000002390607,0.00021880915,0.26551685,0.5667697,0.0024737876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012905811,0.00007587527,0.00033135997,0.00058720005,0.000044055865,8.598343e-7,0.00070882565,0.0000135824785,0.000037926184,0.0445737,0.95332843,0.00016910459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013165093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003649549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9536415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029702038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030381912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972279905","doi":"10.1177/0048393107307809","title":"Rethinking Systems Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Premise; Sociology; Suspect; Systems theory; Ontology; Variety (cybernetics); Mainstream; Reductionism; Social system; Philosophy of science; Metatheory; Cybernetics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30601108637351815,"score_gpt":0.4407086502948644,"score_spread":0.13469756392134624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972279905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3838816,0.0020861237,0.012146595,0.0038013284,0.0064844126,0.00049651176,0.00001251686,0.00007687532,0.591014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998065,6.018668e-7,0.00021979767,0.000210525,0.0007794696,0.0000015106885,2.9902807e-8,0.0000050905905,0.0007179587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942122,0.00054795534,0.0009331281,0.00041952034,0.0035487227,0.0003384865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519116,0.0032232872,0.0007946656,0.0004351458,0.00030269756,0.000053033116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027402649,0.0001247656,0.00033250832,0.00024362265,0.0017719525,0.00030225143,0.0027361196,0.00008036646,0.00007371674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029480953,0.000065136606,0.00031589635,0.002262779,0.0012396725,0.00026484265,0.00045289367,0.0001528104,0.00004703557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000143125635,0.0000140301645,0.002856048,0.0000034031862,0.0000053674953,9.065139e-7,0.0031079121,0.00007535234,0.0002583696,0.9891964,0.0013294218,0.003138457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007747601,0.000023221819,0.011627438,0.000039177892,0.0000049047617,0.0000052018704,0.0017901249,0.00019955685,0.000092197195,0.98338085,0.0026659565,0.00009387022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008606122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023915853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6141834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003600521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008374159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977591471","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352877","title":"Current Philosophy of Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; State (computer science); Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11150013339253372,"score_gpt":0.3093601942171576,"score_spread":0.19786006082462387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977591471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1724436,0.0009382754,0.0000029673254,0.023384657,0.002438228,0.00023775497,0.000038095386,0.000045831544,0.8004706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983561,0.000017292052,0.000043197822,0.00038978882,0.0011271004,0.0000020753484,2.2804826e-7,0.0000032257633,0.000061006664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762267,0.00004943149,0.0003653602,0.0003510399,0.0012724582,0.00033903265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990098,0.00003801402,0.0004168693,0.0002339645,0.00023963056,0.000061714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009495669,0.00015239394,0.00025748234,0.00023745069,0.0033974813,0.000069768445,0.0021880397,0.000025933146,0.000111120666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009021022,0.0001030207,0.0002347556,0.00068414246,0.02905129,0.0007477662,0.00013525791,0.00015440781,0.000011255781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007740691,0.00012829121,0.000054157248,0.000018054525,0.000002417821,9.3174954e-8,0.013685953,0.000004116225,0.0013685137,0.98248905,0.00027381704,0.001967826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012577126,0.00023279499,0.0017669222,0.00008522549,0.000016513082,5.6374046e-7,0.00036918095,0.000019086723,0.0013499298,0.9885319,0.0073350705,0.00016702728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004083604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000089526875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049326718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027615397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978669899","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352867","title":"Cartwright on “Economics”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Positive economics; Economics; Economic methodology; Causality (physics); Variable (mathematics); Philosophy and economics; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07228404409529134,"score_gpt":0.2623460942732963,"score_spread":0.19006205017800498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978669899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35889786,0.00010931744,0.000011165077,0.017159212,0.00050574087,0.00007184236,0.000044610104,0.000011608045,0.6231886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800634,0.00002184242,0.00004340833,0.0013831059,0.0003030758,0.0000018090237,4.0986157e-7,0.000002242595,0.00023778621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932885,0.000013804803,0.00028275832,0.00020590928,0.000018720224,0.00014998544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995558,0.000025051879,0.0002467906,0.00014437673,0.0000069190087,0.00002104969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408569,0.00007414124,0.00018110135,0.000070624046,0.000670402,0.000028203827,0.00052037276,0.00004315496,0.00011285472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040208244,0.000061644874,0.00016660326,0.00017400167,0.00057708775,0.00018655571,0.00002706225,0.000073414005,0.00014882615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035252556,0.000035367975,0.0006228921,0.0000010808808,0.000004897631,3.271487e-8,0.0002657928,0.00011180198,0.0000074981112,0.99848604,0.00022480692,0.00023627466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009835738,0.000063127525,0.008866586,0.000005130155,0.0000017600129,3.4113089e-7,0.00002320818,0.000048634374,0.0002443404,0.9822153,0.00834764,0.00008561261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024577055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038710828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004496414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002180638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51562583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979836458","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269199","title":"Systemism, Social Laws, and the Limits of Social Theory: Themes Out of Mario Bunge’s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social philosophy; Philosophy of social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Social theory; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Social science; Social relation","score_opus":0.088542083237987,"score_gpt":0.2760504615533304,"score_spread":0.1875083783153434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979836458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32762432,0.0011197744,0.000006147979,0.042585105,0.0013375494,0.0005188247,0.00015697567,0.00003740191,0.6266139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981953,0.000013185091,0.000012405938,0.00023636743,0.0010960513,0.000007046926,4.3906857e-7,0.0000063565344,0.00043284055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982464,0.0002143692,0.00038209878,0.0002200456,0.0007113501,0.00022576097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989728,0.00014812357,0.0006035031,0.00011102642,0.00014141989,0.00002315499],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013024332,0.00015295748,0.00040856842,0.000062706924,0.003050652,0.00005612029,0.001032994,0.00006315978,0.00005125823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007211475,0.000085971405,0.00030057682,0.00013971694,0.020413574,0.0002478735,0.00015146771,0.00014111526,0.0000024864653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053880696,0.00006920323,0.000012885751,0.00006236924,0.000028456496,7.2554506e-8,0.15825096,9.775827e-7,0.0003721678,0.84087956,0.00011119312,0.00015824151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075840193,0.00009742323,0.00029612516,0.000051371717,0.00007837116,4.635382e-7,0.0094194235,0.0000017650691,0.00078787643,0.98634636,0.0020232042,0.00013919253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026899824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022763551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67057097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003530931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015079544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980996868","doi":"10.1177/0048393108328149","title":"Racism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Garcia; Epistemology; Psychometrics of racism; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Humanities","score_opus":0.08717438339944503,"score_gpt":0.4051591126937392,"score_spread":0.3179847292942942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980996868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17456342,0.00009093751,0.000007143919,0.117334574,0.0009682943,0.00011677888,0.0000019424351,0.000038014736,0.7068789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576867,0.000021120952,0.00005683992,0.0024570872,0.0012183827,0.0000018163817,9.226703e-8,0.0000018201208,0.00047418757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868315,0.00022341876,0.0001581139,0.00016189157,0.0005030673,0.000270335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.00005948203,0.00014005009,0.0000810899,0.000056898327,0.00003488456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007759782,0.000067340996,0.00012996992,0.00003813008,0.0021044137,0.00003151818,0.00083594007,0.000084786356,0.00011871633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018215406,0.000046763224,0.0001781892,0.00071442407,0.0025419511,0.00016470301,0.000035852616,0.00009747414,0.000019065554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005629996,0.00005483775,0.00091586914,9.1362205e-7,0.0000042414736,1.6158502e-7,0.016309788,4.01796e-7,0.0004241657,0.97036207,0.003403866,0.0085180765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092079594,0.00006683453,0.052834038,0.00000919108,0.000007358203,2.29973e-7,0.0018447825,0.0000011067209,0.0001315567,0.93119335,0.013729607,0.000089860216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037097954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007035737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82120526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032614804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000919845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982051560","doi":"10.1177/0048393112470247","title":"Introducing Philosophy of Social Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Nice; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08881262458303243,"score_gpt":0.3677232200409536,"score_spread":0.2789105954579212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982051560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15969028,0.000075145705,0.000040480365,0.046275828,0.0008021396,0.0002195646,0.000007595954,0.000041629293,0.79284734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712276,0.000011328167,0.0001712583,0.0006009059,0.001954928,0.000004378095,2.618251e-7,0.00000492059,0.00012926938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961172,0.0013035176,0.00040020395,0.00040694914,0.001334434,0.00043769664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801224,0.0008015155,0.0006611774,0.00019221491,0.00026228456,0.0000705798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010401185,0.00013864916,0.0003369455,0.00011075899,0.0058758636,0.00006980452,0.002153228,0.00012437392,0.00012927261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033759084,0.00009965445,0.0002763751,0.002064516,0.019843848,0.0007527161,0.00030810648,0.00026255345,0.00000887497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002368804,0.000058074023,0.0011728937,0.000014012141,0.000008550368,7.211026e-8,0.017901069,0.000003877135,0.001237311,0.97743785,0.00009993497,0.0020426812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000166834,0.00010571041,0.004209347,0.000024124769,0.000023725825,2.5218202e-7,0.0027196135,0.000013738017,0.0009911493,0.9804805,0.011089256,0.00017577436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025196848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010288595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83743244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000637656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040606727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987803148","doi":"10.1177/0048393106293458","title":"On Reviewing <i>Machine Dreams</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.061149330055181035,"score_gpt":0.2596452582306499,"score_spread":0.19849592817546885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987803148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11887548,0.0012009058,0.00005814255,0.0076226653,0.00057150703,0.00010054341,0.000080389225,0.00001509173,0.8714753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998787,0.000027363549,0.00005304607,0.00061189383,0.00028205576,0.0000034728857,8.872134e-7,0.0000030319864,0.00023124555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934465,0.000018881612,0.00030410287,0.00017416159,0.000030037048,0.00012814115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955934,0.000040584127,0.0002651861,0.00011676811,0.0000070860765,0.000011060595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006446689,0.000066747125,0.00017936483,0.000049877694,0.0007144238,0.000022720316,0.00041158934,0.000030167414,0.00008672442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006235435,0.00005340242,0.00016059948,0.00025408104,0.0005844928,0.00014610212,0.000045563444,0.00007009872,0.00010607249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001507093,0.000032542066,0.0019587162,0.0000056758627,0.0000033308281,3.7989242e-8,0.000070756294,0.00010636407,0.000008203009,0.9971762,0.0005449615,0.0000917507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080026184,0.000019438998,0.0025786676,0.00001625278,0.000002341424,3.2307514e-7,0.000007202289,0.00004649245,0.00011047457,0.98858887,0.008477681,0.00007220712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002121753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012897875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87991154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031539308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013201283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54948425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988272152","doi":"10.1177/0048393109334584","title":"The Advantage of Theft over Honest Toil","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Doctrine; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Reading (process); Notation; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.05055420441763033,"score_gpt":0.2940570747563595,"score_spread":0.24350287033872917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988272152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19385345,0.0002979212,0.0000011955414,0.06800163,0.00038136414,0.00021535605,0.00005101965,0.000024134752,0.7371739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981805,0.000018205186,0.000010416735,0.00045279786,0.0008901103,0.0000040136747,3.6460276e-7,0.0000028999868,0.00044065516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991509,0.0000457113,0.000206224,0.00012035039,0.0003303162,0.00014652334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944085,0.00009440947,0.00022277175,0.00016882327,0.000056885052,0.000016270913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026236393,0.000081420585,0.000119491924,0.000022300506,0.0019891586,0.00005609821,0.00073859905,0.000021608737,0.00006351398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023708979,0.000041449697,0.0001600643,0.00013185134,0.0026282042,0.00013736612,0.000048518566,0.000074028954,0.000006583357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005395051,0.00004410165,0.000049082468,0.000003540785,0.0000062965364,3.9406324e-8,0.007430411,0.0000014686475,0.00031574728,0.99045116,0.0004983988,0.001194384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008824645,0.00007153176,0.0022496884,0.00001576668,0.000015949448,2.6684828e-7,0.0011697625,0.000006448862,0.00064324896,0.9738915,0.021770604,0.00007697481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037277554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003346166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007044176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035755347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993021320","doi":"10.1177/0048393109350750","title":"Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11325813001614508,"score_gpt":0.3995810182643606,"score_spread":0.2863228882482155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993021320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50523794,0.000057331035,0.000008160568,0.037690964,0.0008246302,0.00017376055,0.000036360678,0.000031587522,0.4559393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986234,0.00003114966,0.00016056657,0.00062045985,0.00044673178,4.0266175e-7,7.029123e-7,0.0000017227591,0.00011487577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902064,0.000075168515,0.00013607556,0.000117255906,0.000474184,0.0001766854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944305,0.00013039427,0.00014439732,0.0001808937,0.000050035273,0.00005123388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889384,0.000054649245,0.00009101089,0.000030246249,0.0022192898,0.00011555958,0.0010713915,0.000052518622,0.00010016667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010254938,0.000035129437,0.000031026786,0.00032265612,0.00458761,0.0007297428,0.00022806482,0.00010894474,0.000004432732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001844397,0.000009227765,0.0010057922,0.000003644361,0.0000028711747,3.6709235e-8,0.022300607,8.151567e-8,0.00008063797,0.97019494,0.00067908166,0.005721266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014642208,0.00002365963,0.009818005,0.000012345832,0.000014146215,0.0000012037115,0.009150453,0.000033768734,0.0001780675,0.94886947,0.031623736,0.00012871643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045908836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006197949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49338546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051932034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023359757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993592588","doi":"10.1177/0048393107303779","title":"Slaves in Plato's Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criticism; Philosophy; Politics; Presentation (obstetrics); Reading (process); Law; Epistemology; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09458041162055938,"score_gpt":0.38767070286473393,"score_spread":0.2930902912441745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993592588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4792335,0.00011733859,0.000004989549,0.08594099,0.00042653678,0.00016211647,0.0000029984508,0.000026666497,0.43408486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998633,0.000023201357,0.00007710533,0.00032237294,0.00053029123,0.0000017799756,5.1667183e-8,0.0000024972062,0.0004096789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835944,0.00013130538,0.00021895247,0.00017948046,0.0007333194,0.00037752528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994019,0.00032166688,0.0001278258,0.00006921869,0.000044006127,0.00003533172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024196126,0.00007528788,0.00016470482,0.00006811114,0.0016027085,0.000029032915,0.00074793084,0.000066520166,0.00002667269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005017937,0.000051904666,0.00012388067,0.0011883993,0.004639868,0.0001579663,0.00016756837,0.00011972494,0.0000069539624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008350093,0.000069290596,0.031893253,0.000005981526,0.0000060403713,8.2671033e-7,0.023281759,0.0000016788716,0.00016004837,0.9410963,0.0004912865,0.0029852008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021109564,0.00004427957,0.17569965,0.000047051984,0.000010661419,1.8601486e-7,0.011631002,0.000004399674,0.00079360337,0.78731686,0.024038956,0.0002022427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015424596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015340873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5193995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006551142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001022445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996115560","doi":"10.1177/0048393113510467","title":"Is a Post-philosophical Sociology Possible? Insights from Norbert Elias’s Sociology of Knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sociology and Norbert Elias","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of knowledge; Sociology; Epistemology; Relativism; Agency (philosophy); Historical sociology; Medical sociology; Social geometry; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0681591685265393,"score_gpt":0.361854158619655,"score_spread":0.29369499009311567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996115560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.822177,0.00088769465,0.000008915847,0.09138901,0.0012676145,0.00024024116,0.000043227836,0.000048252576,0.08393804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944703,0.000070235794,0.00013675928,0.0029751621,0.0021760943,0.000015236503,0.0000045331954,0.000012661127,0.00013902335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953869,0.00224755,0.00060196646,0.0005757102,0.0006033402,0.0005845124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668306,0.0019029119,0.00060683663,0.00030248778,0.00039337517,0.000111305424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016258069,0.00025854286,0.00070515065,0.00013144176,0.0029528588,0.000014199112,0.0020031056,0.000788858,0.00025602974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013172925,0.00018712712,0.00056139485,0.00057243154,0.0327642,0.00021108784,0.0003420321,0.00047855516,0.000071959344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000451724,0.00017647317,0.015048763,0.000014569435,0.00008762222,2.7193013e-7,0.18173851,0.0000014319913,0.00144063,0.80021644,0.00084744155,0.00038269968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000321592,0.00020651253,0.04241019,0.000029255678,0.00006686421,3.4948056e-7,0.003861943,0.000019470563,0.000674584,0.95046204,0.0017173921,0.00022980555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025241524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053221773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17787658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084336476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006352837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997982957","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370151","title":"To Dismiss “The Received View”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Logical positivism; Rest (music); Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.08288585972574118,"score_gpt":0.30175063637984423,"score_spread":0.21886477665410303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997982957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33510643,0.000044266028,7.671451e-7,0.15882856,0.0030638494,0.0001675734,0.0000054652605,0.000016716558,0.5027664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925549,0.0000023015896,0.00002208797,0.0029309303,0.0017574839,0.000005480937,9.757249e-8,0.000002199588,0.0027244897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916416,0.000028688657,0.000116546216,0.00012629073,0.0004092972,0.0001550053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996799,0.000040106894,0.00007579684,0.0001168801,0.00004882761,0.00003847964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063695107,0.00005965297,0.00009357882,0.000030526975,0.0023039547,0.00004120392,0.00089299877,0.000015715957,0.00050094794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009969989,0.000027475326,0.00007636529,0.00013832365,0.0044720382,0.00010200498,0.000060310944,0.000119396434,0.000046593446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004885253,0.00003553779,0.0001285205,0.0000073888623,0.0000045270995,1.5834291e-7,0.1302589,0.0000011390573,0.0040846914,0.8356922,0.023657452,0.00612458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006193523,0.00006484295,0.001328947,0.000017378448,0.000011292934,4.234053e-7,0.003217333,0.0000048915635,0.00026905895,0.08632419,0.90861815,0.0000815452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021484954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005954179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007580462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061202496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008973693","doi":"10.1177/0048393113497677","title":"Pornography Stumps Analytic Philosophers of Art","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Photography and Visual Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Pornography; Transcendental number; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07644789654378577,"score_gpt":0.2994290937012157,"score_spread":0.22298119715742992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008973693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40884852,0.00011649163,0.0000030689093,0.0055974633,0.00058995426,0.00017410527,0.000040995805,0.00003299413,0.5845964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988132,0.0000045520655,0.000012455785,0.00036254872,0.00067930797,0.0000030712508,9.607379e-7,0.000004253842,0.00011963779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890876,0.00009507343,0.00022850557,0.00016190117,0.00043753957,0.00016823677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944687,0.000047850768,0.00026381842,0.0001238182,0.000090411755,0.000027210333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042169756,0.00010969856,0.00021909887,0.00009624014,0.0008093898,0.000038358965,0.0006037305,0.000034868957,0.00018336874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032381166,0.000066155415,0.0003927727,0.00034591256,0.0033739877,0.0001608781,0.00005555182,0.000092613525,0.0000057720695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009601246,0.00008592578,0.0012884331,0.00003433975,0.00004206505,3.8775323e-8,0.011417218,0.0000034100094,0.00038072676,0.98488486,0.0017554293,0.00009797091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002895707,0.0003403283,0.0041954173,0.00007912625,0.00011133069,3.4135445e-7,0.0026828279,0.00004141912,0.0017112417,0.9696377,0.020665862,0.00024484235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008445768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053499054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5899647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000041539424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019989988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015544292","doi":"10.1177/0048393103262550","title":"How Does It Work?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":501,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Coercion (linguistics); Epistemology; Politics; Control (management); Generalization; Work (physics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09585866243548809,"score_gpt":0.26360977157753107,"score_spread":0.167751109142043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015544292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08989246,0.00015032149,0.000004207744,0.3128001,0.0020233726,0.00014034397,0.000018517094,0.000046171976,0.5949245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587524,0.000004575356,0.000050543702,0.0011048155,0.0014210546,0.0000041619655,1.679943e-7,0.0000036703184,0.001535766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887687,0.00003065442,0.00013088643,0.00020957836,0.00053588813,0.00021615066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996052,0.00002467573,0.00015981717,0.0001195534,0.000058910642,0.00003188098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029335878,0.00010307992,0.00013705337,0.00005744943,0.0027674134,0.00018529901,0.0009885691,0.000027698812,0.000108106804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003918165,0.000055330314,0.0001711955,0.00019446918,0.0071428376,0.00050601445,0.00009263579,0.000100268466,0.000015162874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003837095,0.00003761896,0.000036369354,0.000007803177,0.000004574963,2.4693344e-7,0.028080093,0.0000058375376,0.00008597827,0.97104454,0.0004728684,0.00022021173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011831645,0.000052542327,0.00020847814,0.000038144863,0.000010988648,3.0011384e-7,0.0024044819,4.5555996e-7,0.00029740366,0.95144093,0.04530166,0.00012628039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010419712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021394342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039421804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008007425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017448876","doi":"10.1177/0048393103257195","title":"Irrationalism with a Human Face","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychological Treatments and Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.1603037265753106,"score_gpt":0.44008201565844923,"score_spread":0.2797782890831386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017448876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42674372,0.000033239532,0.000013861358,0.0033770863,0.00018320644,0.00009484154,0.0000050451567,0.000009043866,0.56953996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985913,4.1515707e-7,0.00012533106,0.00039839846,0.00006514506,0.000011980286,3.7121313e-7,0.0000023896198,0.00080464414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923646,0.0001216894,0.000092204944,0.0001673607,0.00024727988,0.00013500646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997554,0.000023588478,0.00009573174,0.00009058093,0.000017418834,0.000017279743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017664194,0.000065352084,0.00008677252,0.000016262622,0.00059614546,0.000015005867,0.00027244858,0.000031495143,0.00041683522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007688698,0.000032764947,0.00005606655,0.00026235965,0.0006764846,0.000047608777,0.000014747932,0.000051095576,0.000013842174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004113256,0.00019775529,0.018808568,9.10376e-7,0.000030558367,6.258301e-7,0.0009223932,0.0000015171977,0.00014997539,0.9792446,0.0005210067,0.0001179831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006580119,0.00028780845,0.33530945,0.000011658365,0.000021157763,0.0000034274467,0.00076947274,2.8413723e-7,0.00014794405,0.66014683,0.0025172126,0.00012676862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027061278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024977674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001025576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000163158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45851293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017692326","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296540","title":"The Conceptual Construction of Altruism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Counterintuitive; Altruism (biology); Positive economics; Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Axiom; Social psychology; Experimental economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08451515193369666,"score_gpt":0.37816313947321256,"score_spread":0.29364798753951593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017692326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76868635,0.00032756463,0.000003274399,0.008885647,0.0010382993,0.00017367203,0.0000054651255,0.000012458672,0.22086726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993257,0.00005580896,0.00016579172,0.00006740809,0.00030930218,0.0000025674249,7.378375e-8,0.000002316172,0.00007103609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886495,0.00010658365,0.00025904228,0.000120429046,0.00041129556,0.00023771093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992762,0.00023275256,0.00031207054,0.000078129655,0.00007523842,0.000025611487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016573351,0.00006319693,0.0001265943,0.000023755292,0.0031686844,0.000022024606,0.00065839407,0.000046845445,0.000015123431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013066168,0.000039346618,0.00012507213,0.00035502843,0.01761382,0.00012561439,0.00011450245,0.0000702023,0.000002400021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007248533,0.00001655598,0.011685182,0.0000010564978,0.0000074418476,3.679942e-8,0.019230513,5.1094213e-7,0.0007880714,0.9666735,0.00008587872,0.0015040368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032559442,0.00013809055,0.023980841,0.000027326394,0.00003729662,7.439508e-7,0.20674746,0.0000020055375,0.029949078,0.7309994,0.007544772,0.0002473753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015413021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073976774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23567405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007161569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119879645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019621904","doi":"10.1177/0048393106289793","title":"Boas and Holism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Ethnography; Space (punctuation); Structure and agency; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06533879391618563,"score_gpt":0.38622697834032893,"score_spread":0.3208881844241433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019621904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4741216,0.0002672459,0.0000057669104,0.08000936,0.00039095242,0.000120944416,0.000007854122,0.0000305802,0.44504568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982858,0.000024602816,0.00010223829,0.00040771277,0.0009832876,0.0000034602056,1.8597265e-7,0.000002780657,0.00018998745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987069,0.00024306354,0.00014599814,0.00016645173,0.00046428535,0.0002733137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949235,0.0002755885,0.00008090551,0.000065267144,0.00005272218,0.00003314966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009128995,0.000063025196,0.00012895474,0.000026493504,0.001942299,0.0000390745,0.0004901804,0.00009154728,0.000033606586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035353377,0.00004524906,0.000084775675,0.00037172815,0.009949722,0.00011310631,0.000106576495,0.00009016914,0.0000035382966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011960514,0.000015791105,0.0031212303,0.0000030892684,0.0000015440405,1.5472982e-7,0.0042593954,6.024438e-7,0.00010762332,0.99126816,0.0008386536,0.00038256985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006461113,0.00001296151,0.021234768,0.00000575419,0.000008752925,2.659888e-7,0.001616903,0.000002311683,0.00006345033,0.96947455,0.007448558,0.00006712432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057772486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004605191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52416414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029155884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010006298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019746670","doi":"10.1177/0048393111408779","title":"Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Ideal type; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Pluralism (philosophy); Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14102738325876052,"score_gpt":0.3624656669870574,"score_spread":0.22143828372829688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019746670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20489207,0.0001919444,0.000010780059,0.00945172,0.00086198456,0.00020668359,0.0000043808645,0.00011967538,0.78426075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980573,0.000028821047,0.0003672154,0.00072802283,0.0006241856,0.000007618529,1.0189154e-7,0.000008719771,0.00017802922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974776,0.000833694,0.00027947812,0.00028729133,0.00067128584,0.00045064025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990173,0.00037209888,0.00030226496,0.00014941624,0.00009009233,0.00006885113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029211182,0.00012949116,0.0002321475,0.000050467755,0.0024468005,0.000038606402,0.0017156986,0.0001573652,0.00046144298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011781288,0.00008689878,0.00027287018,0.00070420036,0.0075147334,0.00024364587,0.00028610922,0.00021471996,0.000056981233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012563135,0.00004669973,0.0048638233,0.000005311253,0.000014370413,4.0055912e-7,0.048890222,8.272404e-7,0.00016179065,0.94490844,0.00043764664,0.000657929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007561209,0.00005323233,0.0058307797,0.000035308633,0.000017435283,2.4552952e-7,0.0076330304,0.000003607846,0.0005026181,0.9838608,0.0018332319,0.00015409014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017597884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011150351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069786314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001701731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020412513","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000307","title":"Is There an Addiction to Sex and Love?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Addiction; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Criminology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08720380855771481,"score_gpt":0.38833102827179716,"score_spread":0.30112721971408235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020412513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82814014,0.000117860014,7.102529e-7,0.0124499975,0.00021481566,0.000096804724,0.0000147629235,0.000027606828,0.15893728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636686,0.000005305622,0.000027665375,0.0008427936,0.00023334967,0.000004115115,2.6046322e-7,0.0000038603253,0.0025157696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992433,0.000089294284,0.000108354354,0.00022953944,0.00017186157,0.00015765105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973273,0.000019612202,0.000047384354,0.00015671273,0.000014554192,0.000029001798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002450695,0.00006752199,0.00010312009,0.00004095842,0.00029493758,0.000014892806,0.00039070475,0.0000922158,0.0017708942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006454929,0.00004775949,0.000039259816,0.00032038125,0.00081166846,0.00006475871,0.00003734395,0.0000769138,0.00007093739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000844463,0.0006647283,0.12807456,0.000008182854,0.000068769405,0.0000022399147,0.09108795,0.000001864173,0.0016983468,0.39213097,0.0071033323,0.3790746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048565023,0.00084223965,0.54299814,0.000014741581,0.00006504901,0.000010239862,0.00626988,0.000009533858,0.0014119456,0.41221908,0.035352126,0.00032140268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000495604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041677136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41492355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009015595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001178123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021664452","doi":"10.1177/0048393107311459","title":"Book Review: Warwick, Andrew. (2003). <i>Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics</i> . Chicago and London: Chicago University Press","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Natural History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering physics; Media studies; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.029584291099176825,"score_gpt":0.22452075085310982,"score_spread":0.194936459753933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021664452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14495505,0.43829957,0.000015178421,0.02610388,0.0009114394,0.0016045879,0.00020219969,0.00004430429,0.38786379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729824,0.015623346,0.00004097155,0.002094356,0.00033383083,0.0000025152278,5.511912e-7,0.000007718127,0.008914298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989508,0.00018985737,0.00019112912,0.00016185317,0.00038090764,0.00012548015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932164,0.00011811135,0.00029223505,0.00012452615,0.00011281324,0.000030699994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065937464,0.00009790548,0.00031408944,0.000025643705,0.0011731196,0.0000065385143,0.00046300702,0.000026632146,0.000046455323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006620699,0.000053860556,0.000104741084,0.00014423089,0.021164715,0.00026449584,0.00010983141,0.00011285269,8.099077e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089892965,0.0000680011,0.000036742244,0.00035628694,0.000024989811,6.002955e-7,0.03026895,3.598487e-7,0.00007079931,0.904825,0.06382042,0.00043800092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001959624,0.00033681118,0.000724503,0.0010186861,0.00041381718,0.000014041641,0.0031716859,0.000097711,0.00068095076,0.051314905,0.93977445,0.00049278943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072035604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045171178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87595403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012976627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006836599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98149914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10110631720804651,"score_gpt":0.36467742220890004,"score_spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023979196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66059387,0.00035808128,0.0000041329545,0.028555833,0.00009300453,0.00014080475,0.000050330924,0.000013249091,0.3101907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902034,0.00024847174,0.00009086988,0.0001914351,0.00036942278,0.0000028825987,3.341682e-7,0.0000042878855,0.00007196986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804354,0.0004233408,0.00032001268,0.00019730434,0.00072254514,0.0002932326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989286,0.00050531863,0.00023670959,0.000121207864,0.0001421805,0.00006599061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016342874,0.0001138567,0.00029934602,0.00006172985,0.0009226936,0.000028222126,0.0009357797,0.00014014964,0.00008192165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039795053,0.00007407344,0.00013919578,0.00068461144,0.007927242,0.00031098176,0.00010845418,0.00019561485,0.0000012830893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714152,0.000091005306,0.0014116023,0.000030559506,0.000031961517,5.5017566e-8,0.05401647,0.000028877903,0.00030062062,0.9403814,0.000017531387,0.003672786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012845384,0.00005562184,0.0041898577,0.00010374925,0.000018379169,1.528026e-7,0.0033468225,0.000026869995,0.0023837965,0.9894926,0.0001567587,0.0000969224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00162948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017452726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33842647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001698482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019519556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026018820","doi":"10.1177/0048393108328147","title":"Constructing “The Economy”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Mainstream economics; Positive economics; Economic methodology; Economics; Mainstream; Neoclassical economics; Power (physics); Economy; Heterodox economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Applied economics; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07170740387913957,"score_gpt":0.2651064265427812,"score_spread":0.19339902266364165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026018820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13962668,0.00023167612,0.00005269038,0.03856489,0.0004812179,0.0000900303,0.00002691177,0.000012200209,0.8209137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838334,0.0000060881002,0.00007880321,0.0011062735,0.00030754556,0.0000018679629,2.4728553e-7,0.0000016146731,0.00011421378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936324,0.000018654808,0.00029585374,0.00015904254,0.000017975231,0.00014520742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994881,0.00004248196,0.00031522432,0.00012949995,0.000009981256,0.000014689631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069410255,0.00006208229,0.00015189816,0.00003926324,0.0010701995,0.00004471341,0.0006238608,0.000032909953,0.00010035888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007461198,0.00004411711,0.00014597194,0.00022418819,0.0012524569,0.00022834277,0.000043152635,0.000086615095,0.0000551454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010822156,0.000010543964,0.0027404304,0.000001380018,0.0000053042318,2.3481345e-8,0.00034755934,0.000016842136,0.0000030876001,0.9962493,0.00014998211,0.00047445443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067702895,0.000018030283,0.0031859411,0.000004157506,0.0000023642556,0.0000014529337,0.0002307381,0.00007306614,0.00009742828,0.9917511,0.00450309,0.00006498076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029230554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057278558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85875666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039360577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026455271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8231217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026172606","doi":"10.1177/0048393110368043","title":"Dissent about Descent: Evolution, Design, and Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Pace; Descent (aeronautics); Epistemology; Sociology; Connection (principal bundle); Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.06282315409969418,"score_gpt":0.3053252946581667,"score_spread":0.24250214055847252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026172606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8496153,0.00024453277,0.00011763186,0.04308769,0.005200863,0.00031830743,0.0000042391503,0.000031223684,0.101380214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980449,0.0000043072587,0.00020183626,0.00017689804,0.0008647271,0.0000073367632,2.7641084e-7,0.0000017928547,0.00069791515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938035,0.00004847297,0.0001115384,0.00012233791,0.0002313377,0.00010598309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.000030260939,0.00010387422,0.00006743599,0.00009806966,0.000027440785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004173516,0.000051900028,0.000055084023,0.000045184635,0.0016565934,0.00009080005,0.00026074395,0.000020050938,0.000137142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007566264,0.000033545544,0.00003840125,0.00011000361,0.0025129055,0.0002409221,0.000029571698,0.000072769224,0.0000064751407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011964003,0.000052323412,0.0014738465,0.000004574669,0.0000011542232,2.6936124e-9,0.011889074,0.0000011245802,0.00064849464,0.98338,0.0016504697,0.000897732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068464265,0.000035627043,0.07058487,0.000025320118,0.000014342918,0.0000011098731,0.005092991,0.00017743283,0.00030780328,0.9136083,0.009952627,0.00013107646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018116669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014698267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14842962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016964914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002092084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030912446","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000301","title":"Cultural Evolution, Reductionism in the Social Sciences, and Explanatory Pluralism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Autonomy; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0954617405030361,"score_gpt":0.2954537666560501,"score_spread":0.199992026153014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030912446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5916271,0.0006077578,1.2479953e-7,0.052887727,0.0005604349,0.00014611863,0.000017544578,0.000020721038,0.35413244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972525,0.00002306036,0.000011590588,0.00093427754,0.0013683413,0.0000088092065,4.0934856e-7,0.0000024321998,0.00039853776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844533,0.00016344567,0.00021582724,0.00026697022,0.0006530103,0.00025543952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969214,0.000041527615,0.00012599093,0.000076754826,0.000045043464,0.00001852359],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091616815,0.00011530845,0.00014001864,0.00007796991,0.00794528,0.00019479489,0.0009702713,0.000038854738,0.00023504617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022283804,0.00006572113,0.00009931977,0.00033115834,0.015919453,0.00074198743,0.000046752466,0.00015989266,0.0000101414935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047772664,0.000032129556,0.00009507292,0.0000055481723,0.0000025115855,2.4143785e-7,0.08882832,0.000005032024,0.000041765263,0.9083572,0.0021959646,0.00043143783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002431591,0.00011187979,0.008714165,0.000039429087,0.000020060903,0.000007895238,0.022633182,0.000024726853,0.000018413812,0.92212754,0.04579769,0.0002618543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066467177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002334074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4056254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005155633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009552198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034894669","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550807","title":"Experts within Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Rationality; Enthusiasm; GRASP; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.12972467962030537,"score_gpt":0.3181099485397181,"score_spread":0.1883852689194127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034894669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2600937,0.000100123754,0.000013171507,0.039556857,0.00265944,0.000115556606,0.0000065827294,0.000040718114,0.69741386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956832,0.0000024336177,0.000053132233,0.0013878512,0.0019226501,0.0000025410634,2.4752353e-7,0.000004193901,0.00094375794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991099,0.00015063865,0.00016466415,0.00013991751,0.00028944373,0.00014542481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995102,0.00011622641,0.00017981058,0.000107195396,0.00006727674,0.00001924706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006841354,0.00007666852,0.00014595136,0.000024899959,0.0016911753,0.0000503557,0.0004932825,0.000034783312,0.00006320685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118476986,0.00004639645,0.00013353417,0.00005766469,0.003841779,0.00014263918,0.00006610947,0.00009042329,0.000010791946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017453009,0.000021096836,0.00020778968,0.000010590528,0.0000063678644,3.1781436e-8,0.047395524,0.0000021810868,0.00006843113,0.9514009,0.0006147459,0.00027063242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066773995,0.00004487773,0.00026821566,0.000014874215,0.000012926852,2.1761801e-7,0.0020516687,0.000026695641,0.00036236594,0.98461217,0.012458371,0.00008083669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001757237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016765812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7355895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073052925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038659113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036307079","doi":"10.1177/0048393103262549","title":"Systems and Mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08242808562170979,"score_gpt":0.3831817262013647,"score_spread":0.3007536405796549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036307079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38955447,0.0007436069,0.0007290958,0.19172719,0.0027443678,0.00067490427,0.000025234078,0.00011809842,0.41368303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990583,0.00003034383,0.00017688182,0.0003029565,0.00038129912,0.000006096008,8.9777615e-8,0.0000029391704,0.00004108524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869645,0.00021163776,0.00014439074,0.00016755171,0.0005191599,0.00026080364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956816,0.00016942166,0.000084767365,0.00006901705,0.000057247144,0.000051411942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454929,0.00006376748,0.00014204807,0.000026050811,0.00190944,0.000046670422,0.0005236825,0.00009651613,0.000010594324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000456704,0.00004485901,0.00007235757,0.00035684614,0.0060652657,0.0001156409,0.00010147397,0.000088366956,0.00000386883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001096427,0.000012643457,0.000105301995,0.0000059219974,0.0000030447295,1.8884427e-7,0.008591799,0.000007525902,0.00016530261,0.99098337,0.000028073788,0.00009571667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008911107,0.000026955746,0.0006607456,0.000015765483,0.000008904631,5.4529164e-7,0.006769058,0.000001961671,0.000078680896,0.9917123,0.00057485,0.00006116098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035114533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014053429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60950387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000616522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017416349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040456481","doi":"10.1177/0048393109337474","title":"In Wittgenstein’s Shadow","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Shadow (psychology); Epistemology; SAINT; Analytic philosophy; State (computer science); Art history; Psychoanalysis; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.05530656851848577,"score_gpt":0.36464122490912787,"score_spread":0.3093346563906421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040456481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15428871,0.00009307553,0.0000052294135,0.059660204,0.0005194892,0.000111566245,0.000003377919,0.0000139916165,0.78530437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970426,0.0000014867846,0.000039914405,0.0024874848,0.00031555787,0.0000031410632,6.424183e-8,0.000001898529,0.00010783145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987115,0.0001407937,0.00020132598,0.00025852455,0.00038274803,0.00030510468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962056,0.00006477345,0.000103079816,0.00015604935,0.00001920056,0.00003635208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067604857,0.00008961273,0.00014959597,0.000060089715,0.00034691356,0.0000152041475,0.0010118848,0.000064218955,0.00025230504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000623842,0.000057152643,0.00011332148,0.0010336349,0.001941231,0.00014138091,0.0000587647,0.00013462329,0.00004363171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013596695,0.0000964203,0.00043302003,0.0000011380888,0.0000020009893,0.0000014101865,0.001709632,0.0000022196912,0.00039952944,0.9961213,0.00015356812,0.0010661627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001373438,0.0001011209,0.04412638,0.00001069124,0.000003533917,0.0000018231598,0.000088538865,0.000006856395,0.00027476458,0.9550501,0.00012172409,0.000077132805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000805641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066073126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8427539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020918162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029531762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71525466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041511474","doi":"10.1177/0048393112454335","title":"One’s a Crowd? On Greenwood’s Delimitation of the Social","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Social ontology; Ontology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2685581418568099,"score_gpt":0.40558601825595936,"score_spread":0.13702787639914948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041511474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54365444,0.00018009135,0.0000052445516,0.07546257,0.0010062583,0.0003076156,0.000012316737,0.000022759219,0.37934873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975273,0.00001377354,0.000031870746,0.0009915902,0.0012197207,0.000006408124,2.5172235e-7,0.0000035348144,0.0002055546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967658,0.0016933779,0.00024760916,0.00014560815,0.00084936974,0.00029823754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.00083611475,0.00049079384,0.00010877562,0.00009462868,0.000040986954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036840693,0.00009146513,0.00018286235,0.00002749381,0.0036994203,0.0000267534,0.0009999111,0.00013058132,0.000083039035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012486662,0.000056229397,0.00029802797,0.0007258221,0.0040708566,0.0004464306,0.00012817854,0.00021511225,0.000009250939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720518,0.00014432603,0.0055007963,0.0000070874053,0.00001747151,2.0172465e-8,0.04292402,0.0000017662156,0.00019075554,0.9483541,0.00028579467,0.00253665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020455378,0.00011052,0.12579823,0.000035523397,0.000058908823,1.2936215e-7,0.0119324,0.000002038169,0.00058019924,0.85284346,0.008250927,0.00018308937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004499647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006330352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45387286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004732345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015767159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044929331","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269196","title":"An Evolutionary Social Science? A Skeptic’s Brief, Theoretical and Substantive","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Conceptualization; Verisimilitude; Skepticism; Philosophy of science; Grammar; Abductive reasoning; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03597539877135871,"score_gpt":0.2703370355074484,"score_spread":0.2343616367360897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044929331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.777488,0.00015535996,0.00012837225,0.0072959196,0.00030507884,0.00011212738,0.000090828995,0.000016676491,0.21440765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915075,0.000012591021,0.00023493163,0.00031106803,0.00027330758,0.0000040234304,5.3778643e-7,0.0000036522417,0.000009118382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906516,0.000023126735,0.00027263694,0.00032487005,0.00007515559,0.0002390504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959546,0.000023917157,0.00019417268,0.00010816291,0.000032382795,0.00004588802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010255816,0.00008717265,0.00018701855,0.0001111184,0.0023594364,0.00006853412,0.0006212904,0.00005437502,0.000069345704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000962463,0.000075308395,0.00009569017,0.00044692174,0.014015364,0.0006386335,0.00010382662,0.000099868856,0.000016608048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064850096,0.000060969003,0.0019886547,0.0000030904791,0.000005623864,1.1778724e-7,0.0026025153,0.0000151026825,0.00010435977,0.9951411,0.000008244645,0.000063728396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020166942,0.00005584687,0.035012368,0.0000057779307,0.0000041565804,0.0000020721454,0.00034139692,0.00006395115,0.00017515197,0.96387976,0.00015287347,0.000104977684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053837837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037028692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22166279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010183181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013385646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051062416","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100307","title":"Systems and Emergence, Rationality and Imprecision, Free-Wheeling and Evidence, Science and Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ideology; Wheeling; Epistemology; Sociology; Principle of rationality; Positive economics; Political science; Ecological rationality; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.305119869803679,"score_gpt":0.44864458690432174,"score_spread":0.14352471710064274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051062416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764762,0.01123478,0.00040521726,0.0071294312,0.0007324966,0.00029964303,0.000008100848,0.000013619493,0.0037005031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990093,0.00017878109,0.0003346354,0.0001614213,0.0002242938,0.0000056079616,2.3555138e-8,0.0000032474582,0.000082683284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951677,0.00035020272,0.0007656387,0.0008114955,0.0026098315,0.00029518837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961206,0.0021708878,0.000518927,0.00036504914,0.00069312844,0.0001314388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012714722,0.00015649827,0.00039520022,0.0003297579,0.0028454843,0.0006344482,0.0012045616,0.00006943817,0.000020766196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092904,0.00009260421,0.00005020438,0.0021745118,0.005976296,0.0010142209,0.0013913434,0.00011177959,0.0000015308411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059082573,0.00003070778,0.33818752,0.00004218631,0.0000131774805,0.000002425289,0.003776374,0.000064664906,0.0034392974,0.63502944,0.0021551584,0.017199995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018525869,0.00007091576,0.25803718,0.00010752302,0.000010853828,0.000060477207,0.0014823192,0.0056282994,0.000020390515,0.73347855,0.0007665178,0.00015172841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003710356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084199084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09844912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001762361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018171038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052872890","doi":"10.1177/0048393112444501","title":"The Freeman-Mead Controversy Revisited","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Sociology; Anthropology; American samoa; Rest (music); Ethnology; Social science","score_opus":0.0595234506591921,"score_gpt":0.34929386136632107,"score_spread":0.28977041070712894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052872890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2274462,0.0021170075,0.000008238429,0.11896189,0.002840878,0.0005891327,0.00001971961,0.00008846784,0.6479285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963655,0.00013561916,0.000025927786,0.00057902135,0.0020533546,0.0000072167763,3.8288772e-7,0.000003688049,0.0008292771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795955,0.00038259788,0.0001943128,0.00012452171,0.00085172127,0.00048727661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991549,0.00032148455,0.00023756534,0.00011012755,0.0001086259,0.000067278605],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018006086,0.000095578405,0.0001496127,0.00001457072,0.0073796404,0.000099001,0.0011034528,0.00008303956,0.000037633552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006446327,0.000049095463,0.00023880402,0.0008039194,0.004068227,0.0003403048,0.000113873786,0.00012865843,0.000020456584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054058514,0.000024753617,0.0067123566,0.0000031161553,0.0000148824265,3.1295016e-8,0.014762375,4.7158608e-7,0.000090548965,0.9738556,0.0023901404,0.0021403204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034409526,0.0000537585,0.059981324,0.000047773552,0.00009472403,5.249117e-7,0.0274852,0.000025732383,0.00014286312,0.7767362,0.13468379,0.00040402607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008463277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032276785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7689193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072337716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009956646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053226751","doi":"10.1177/0048393114543987","title":"Book Review: <i>Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences</i> by Muhammad Ali Khalidi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Natural science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10513633589216688,"score_gpt":0.3214449387050039,"score_spread":0.21630860281283704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053226751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19248097,0.21487793,4.11708e-7,0.45765287,0.00197485,0.0008930405,0.000028523455,0.00004360307,0.1320478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982887,0.0003561706,0.0000033830968,0.015379576,0.0006059547,0.000009782632,0.000002438887,0.0000026742719,0.0007530075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984492,0.00015241574,0.0002249345,0.00024284866,0.0007101823,0.00022042709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995843,0.000049400216,0.00019734917,0.0000713791,0.000072113304,0.00002545422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017144727,0.000114399074,0.00019396856,0.000055830395,0.0027548985,0.00011774652,0.0006142988,0.000028256447,0.000021480299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058843016,0.00006024821,0.000049873383,0.00020876415,0.011412773,0.0005466433,0.00006747711,0.00016817792,0.00000159417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006356347,0.000046709567,0.0003449635,0.000095608935,0.0000050288218,4.8508684e-7,0.12524661,6.181757e-8,0.0004702177,0.38453037,0.4884047,0.0008489068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040513472,0.00019078654,0.0018214458,0.00017118141,0.000049058326,0.0000045598704,0.026488317,0.000017175718,0.00005334004,0.041197147,0.92934614,0.00025571187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043631773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025195032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79040605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031572246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095955766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054223592","doi":"10.1177/004931032002003","title":"Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Individualism; Commission; Epistemology; Sociology; Centrality; Conceptual framework; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06454170758339181,"score_gpt":0.31340657300783453,"score_spread":0.24886486542444272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054223592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3009247,0.00033954388,0.0000028185925,0.10610022,0.00014658675,0.0002878493,0.000016627613,0.000011492924,0.5921702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992029,0.00011285294,0.000079779,0.0002638607,0.00017244364,0.0000028336851,1.4809913e-7,0.0000010468739,0.00016414869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876183,0.0001993708,0.00014979964,0.00009182917,0.0006850136,0.0001121251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995067,0.00013213874,0.00018740428,0.00003611527,0.0001225404,0.0000150925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014771746,0.000042354462,0.00009760071,0.000021188695,0.0011615515,0.000027843396,0.00039444567,0.000041891777,0.000033254775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018761307,0.000024603216,0.00007786211,0.00042548956,0.0039089853,0.00014825376,0.000046846963,0.000056045083,0.0000015618981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041256676,0.000018837016,0.0017739084,0.000005562527,0.0000053079825,9.636638e-9,0.025246784,0.000009400822,0.000008381222,0.9715597,0.00047351466,0.0008944623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027987923,0.000018994198,0.0029415076,0.000012937988,0.0000106276375,1.7979397e-7,0.003076165,0.0006484595,0.000010689245,0.98996514,0.0029789035,0.000056501813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087769993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047865033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028650682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006250775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058027163","doi":"10.1177/0048393105280832","title":"Historical Materialism and Supervenience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Materialism; Historical materialism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Individuation; Sociology; Metaphysics; Law; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07077875656375743,"score_gpt":0.325779412050909,"score_spread":0.25500065548715156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058027163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54663205,0.00025208542,0.0000050098197,0.1801671,0.000696004,0.00012147684,0.0000042715246,0.00002980853,0.2720922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.000028217934,0.0001667318,0.0006357239,0.0010605316,0.0000034828506,3.218849e-8,0.0000018200425,0.00044387765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990283,0.00013100867,0.00015428296,0.00014859701,0.00028367323,0.00025408345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970865,0.000074739335,0.000070500355,0.000057672554,0.000024761606,0.00006369095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007913007,0.00005659023,0.00012177812,0.000025677073,0.001477836,0.00004323832,0.0004771502,0.000056609184,0.00007131606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001853453,0.00004102954,0.00007312535,0.00019787201,0.002477255,0.00027295528,0.00010010202,0.000056284116,0.0000055943265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018326992,0.000019432915,0.000932755,0.0000036365961,0.000001756837,6.504209e-8,0.0046183467,3.5228396e-7,0.00007519324,0.9919265,0.00043496015,0.001985176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015002297,0.000038209924,0.008765003,0.000015437225,0.000014605571,8.464823e-7,0.00066995784,0.0000079865395,0.0004489883,0.7076261,0.28209028,0.00017254839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021712587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001733886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45102754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012735369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010804214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061197887","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269203","title":"Book Reviews: Understanding Early Civilizations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15673431410655525,"score_gpt":0.3646054108212802,"score_spread":0.20787109671472492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061197887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042981976,0.0037040475,0.0015244829,0.120924175,0.0008516328,0.0007572048,0.00001841274,0.000063797575,0.86785805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819213,0.00034639466,0.00006621931,0.00074971863,0.0003116831,0.000007947931,2.4197314e-7,0.0000024345566,0.00032322056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875355,0.00016862976,0.00024077097,0.00011452782,0.000507967,0.00021454682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964696,0.000036145622,0.0001575109,0.00007783681,0.00004186453,0.000039694663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092859985,0.000066255045,0.00013498327,0.000047068865,0.0038115282,0.00006968162,0.000527822,0.0000425134,0.000065154905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009879115,0.00004649179,0.00016308845,0.0010943996,0.0016028682,0.00044079885,0.000027121687,0.00006309806,0.00001716884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.9178846e-7,0.000015790107,0.00029502538,0.000008686514,0.000003622772,3.619863e-8,0.016543286,0.000027413098,0.00001008174,0.9814508,0.0016166714,0.000028082603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016985078,0.000024535158,0.0014308299,0.00018009449,0.000022356295,2.429776e-7,0.004237331,0.0000015232378,0.000030682688,0.87236005,0.1214061,0.0001364229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001391464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011785222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017029946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020752983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062346776","doi":"10.1177/0048393112451739","title":"Honesty Still Is the Best Policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Advice (programming); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06514659820678258,"score_gpt":0.3606297717950579,"score_spread":0.2954831735882753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062346776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07744002,0.00011835022,0.000014582461,0.3593148,0.00089440215,0.00018526897,0.000017731605,0.000028262142,0.56198657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886249,0.000056034183,0.000033511962,0.004915635,0.0053084595,0.000003784231,1.07153426e-7,0.000004386928,0.0010531868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802864,0.00039069782,0.00018588011,0.00016763239,0.00082638673,0.0004007716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917704,0.00033043025,0.00019603928,0.0001586174,0.00007686044,0.000061000315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017262656,0.000094079376,0.00013852995,0.000041412284,0.0028803363,0.00005521452,0.0017141014,0.000113353715,0.000039721763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000825694,0.00005135854,0.0001671778,0.0008713945,0.007401903,0.00014601582,0.00015098322,0.00018349175,0.000036819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010772287,0.000014572773,0.0031457904,0.0000036513986,0.000004614393,1.6958648e-8,0.021336097,0.0000023670107,0.000016133516,0.97139835,0.002887994,0.0011893271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007107993,0.000027820286,0.0024518594,0.000014464721,0.00001845219,2.6840408e-7,0.0027696993,0.000022870936,0.000106278254,0.8572266,0.13719004,0.00010056013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008568381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018609973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91118485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004905952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036245692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065460455","doi":"10.1177/0048393110386670","title":"We Socratic Philosophers Know that We Know Nothing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Socratic method; Philosophy; Epistemology; Need to know; Computer science","score_opus":0.1313058193916601,"score_gpt":0.3019493335893317,"score_spread":0.17064351419767157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065460455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013904404,0.005896455,0.0000055367595,0.2778996,0.0033955188,0.0003286145,0.000046238663,0.00011042396,0.6984132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989752,0.00016663926,0.00004689363,0.0011527926,0.007518556,0.00001261126,9.050977e-7,0.000018076387,0.0013315451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997921,0.00016509308,0.0003178163,0.00027261328,0.0007806951,0.0005428173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00022056595,0.0003206003,0.00021703298,0.000056831715,0.00009987513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055588095,0.00024855902,0.0003344516,0.00008217043,0.0026011923,0.0001523291,0.00094729895,0.00008371365,0.00060472114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067229084,0.00015947946,0.0004193133,0.00023709191,0.0036834134,0.00083951646,0.00022224583,0.00028264392,0.00010678651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009346626,0.00015299222,0.00019924411,0.00005201529,0.00003420328,2.3345808e-7,0.054224752,0.0000023174407,0.00006546952,0.9407234,0.0016380991,0.0028979213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001802744,0.00005555216,0.00010447974,0.00015951267,0.00006544357,0.000001020442,0.0025095302,0.00002372451,0.00039401947,0.83738714,0.15885134,0.00026794197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047837137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026853846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051619056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005974758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065619419","doi":"10.1177/0048393108315532","title":"Review Essay: Boudon's European Diagnosis of and Prophylactic against Relativism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Evolutionism; Cultural relativism; Epistemology; Deconstruction (building); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Moral relativism; Sociology; Social science; Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.16436530620133313,"score_gpt":0.3656941021350252,"score_spread":0.20132879593369205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065619419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3415858,0.01649539,0.0000025121635,0.05098613,0.00019500715,0.00044910025,0.000007964207,0.000031067084,0.59024704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98701614,0.011234556,0.000047319514,0.0013303558,0.00021243739,0.0000067830165,2.3463157e-7,0.000003867305,0.00014830731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965431,0.0023790726,0.00027177628,0.00020126416,0.0004279751,0.00017682776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984738,0.00081089645,0.00047443944,0.000111556095,0.00008019542,0.000049066497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037405652,0.00009325075,0.00025431655,0.000025305953,0.002375906,0.000013400391,0.00056955405,0.0000517195,0.00003910981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021207158,0.000061030896,0.0001557367,0.0006144836,0.006647606,0.0003765069,0.00013568604,0.00017738219,0.0000044325793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052003063,0.00035372903,0.06230963,0.0006468408,0.00006989238,0.000009991805,0.06976399,0.0000028821726,0.00012038713,0.8414417,0.0020526682,0.02317627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005340161,0.00047116555,0.057547078,0.001600562,0.00017516423,0.0000051219477,0.0038115114,0.000004947753,0.0002030506,0.82673573,0.1082542,0.00065747683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013759181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062228737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6454304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002009551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018187388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067295203","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100401","title":"Between Social Science and Social Technology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Sociology; Social philosophy; Epistemology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social change; Social science; Social technology; Context (archaeology); Social epistemology; Social science education; Social relation; Political science; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.09912128412610711,"score_gpt":0.3912407030522486,"score_spread":0.2921194189261415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067295203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42990515,0.00011115246,0.0000060889233,0.2541096,0.0006241157,0.00024016234,0.000013871608,0.000102586055,0.31488726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722385,0.00004396178,0.00006319395,0.00057580584,0.0018752011,0.000006138274,2.7508335e-7,0.0000071064787,0.0002044482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964966,0.00021795621,0.0002815966,0.0004237932,0.0018673461,0.0007126994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990153,0.00014220265,0.00028239615,0.000105893356,0.00038791637,0.000066300076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003565645,0.00015344526,0.00029055265,0.00024880268,0.013776512,0.00016071227,0.0018448932,0.00028883287,0.000031063508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006457175,0.000121723206,0.00012945312,0.0034685074,0.03607323,0.00047614472,0.00039953153,0.00036330536,0.000009160731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063168272,0.000035639296,0.015021953,0.00001031473,0.000010653507,5.3026565e-7,0.046718765,1.0982686e-7,0.0002461054,0.9284255,0.00052705326,0.008997089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029678125,0.00007478374,0.044684518,0.000019432413,0.00005036766,0.0000015302128,0.020467142,0.0000038251596,0.00028425155,0.8734115,0.06034171,0.0003641751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057390146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017743222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56731874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014671512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091214234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074319057","doi":"10.1177/0048393106293377","title":"Rescuing the <i>Gorgias</i> from Latour","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Key (lock); Politics; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05277579070202116,"score_gpt":0.328475330002744,"score_spread":0.27569953930072283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074319057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5413299,0.00040703051,0.0000047336507,0.062127728,0.00076153094,0.00015977613,0.000017665667,0.000038496553,0.3951531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962304,0.00003143769,0.000052355655,0.0007981977,0.002544421,0.0000061092137,7.817229e-7,0.0000045173047,0.00033172924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799323,0.0005782961,0.00021664257,0.00021079143,0.00066247664,0.00033857094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911046,0.0004515448,0.00020385877,0.00014562465,0.00006341571,0.000025109199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490956,0.00009187221,0.00016028801,0.000022662321,0.004458363,0.000059353348,0.0013621921,0.000117684314,0.000072047755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016397066,0.000052232394,0.00020487844,0.0005787089,0.0054956004,0.00014066344,0.00013025013,0.00017390272,0.000012084342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000324187,0.00002598377,0.013798548,0.0000016100674,0.000009059396,2.705447e-7,0.015966026,0.000012921618,0.00028064055,0.9654858,0.004169722,0.00024618168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009687044,0.000011576095,0.024259206,0.000011556557,0.000019847079,1.0801594e-7,0.005231629,0.0000065470945,0.00023049882,0.9552195,0.014810517,0.00010215646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017524257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023089212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45490053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042025345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018733689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078839159","doi":"10.1177/0048393107303776","title":"Defending Scientific Study of the Social","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Criticism; Relativism; Epistemology; Sociology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.22716297335120786,"score_gpt":0.42963739057573025,"score_spread":0.2024744172245224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078839159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82596755,0.000061263156,0.0000039390443,0.008177803,0.0012510547,0.00036190634,0.000004721639,0.000018692352,0.16415308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882376,0.0000018960196,0.000013095913,0.00014897609,0.0006571209,0.0000029611276,1.0624526e-7,0.0000033597244,0.00034871208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963292,0.0014771072,0.00036070962,0.0002693762,0.0012127594,0.000350856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820304,0.0008870819,0.0005804443,0.00016025182,0.00013036549,0.000038830254],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011451529,0.00010282172,0.00021141414,0.00005537446,0.010530193,0.00008686023,0.0018149819,0.00010251343,0.00007277528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011545166,0.000059438673,0.00027675895,0.0019268201,0.007992074,0.00033991862,0.00030440197,0.0002489543,0.0000033789395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004747327,0.00039182464,0.035614822,0.000008064821,0.000030462776,4.822571e-7,0.19606791,0.0000030434917,0.0005922406,0.7653611,0.0002452618,0.0016373629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039800955,0.00017565345,0.11110843,0.00002606785,0.00007575176,3.5289887e-7,0.1791499,0.000001822823,0.00055510225,0.69979,0.008481586,0.00023730131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065600954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005499706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17285623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053044376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022034113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079813789","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352876","title":"Book Review: Steven D. Hales Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. Cloth. 216 pp","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04770823042147856,"score_gpt":0.28454254452051386,"score_spread":0.2368343140990353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079813789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011782552,0.116191976,0.0000024924636,0.23484702,0.0009750591,0.0009347889,0.00023583132,0.000043123695,0.64559144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604422,0.008636355,0.000049344057,0.016578639,0.0042841444,0.00008074361,0.000007051135,0.00003069968,0.009890843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980431,0.00022784031,0.00053085724,0.00031408118,0.0006258254,0.0002582976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984452,0.00044528308,0.0005777969,0.0003263275,0.00015201718,0.000053392247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760395,0.00022224113,0.00046908756,0.00004271712,0.0019073793,0.00010292323,0.00086821185,0.00007434625,0.00025746785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022469579,0.00012251592,0.00036918273,0.0001628077,0.010700061,0.0005516911,0.00024640674,0.00039060586,0.000011000309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026501984,0.00007581268,0.00001610045,0.0001586118,0.000049743765,2.3254799e-7,0.001704223,3.712397e-7,0.000019300009,0.8804104,0.11734557,0.00019317503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038768473,0.000046956335,0.00015339689,0.00022801451,0.00014213828,0.0000015211157,0.000043800093,0.000016040914,0.000054351658,0.46548793,0.5332918,0.00014633597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028481914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010437864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000119466085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000844551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081282198","doi":"10.1177/0048393108323883","title":"Book Review: Bunge, Mario. 2006. Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07672702572118759,"score_gpt":0.3687742981605271,"score_spread":0.2920472724393395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081282198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059265504,0.25371107,0.000013737273,0.052131865,0.0009646538,0.0008932314,0.00022433235,0.000087870096,0.68604666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69056743,0.2980306,0.00019586892,0.0062667425,0.0016938687,0.0000055202972,0.000006527797,0.000020985945,0.0032124673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969297,0.00082209817,0.0003527305,0.0003456506,0.0010974031,0.00045239014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986335,0.00037625676,0.00038790645,0.00027052689,0.00022148517,0.00011034612],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015438165,0.00014710262,0.00045372776,0.0000064886185,0.002104694,0.000012588626,0.0013382607,0.00019290861,0.0009504567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069697783,0.00012663222,0.00031159256,0.00017369191,0.008077264,0.0006040623,0.00025733653,0.00013622177,0.0000016774784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050386883,0.00025261915,0.0007194569,0.00025404626,0.00006328433,0.000004776054,0.04894043,0.0000024453486,0.00012134487,0.4756971,0.47225383,0.0016402779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041222075,0.00015133507,0.008268846,0.000425784,0.00016329852,0.0000021942267,0.0058761933,0.000009182974,0.000073052404,0.038579583,0.94561845,0.00041985197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34031025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025448322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6846409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041938064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004386349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081301242","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352772","title":"Science as Commodities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Economics; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.10906597542454707,"score_gpt":0.3157061078839911,"score_spread":0.20664013245944404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081301242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26203668,0.00008562088,0.000010026607,0.04496289,0.00031297727,0.000050435283,0.000015238131,0.000010689323,0.69251543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966329,0.000004796203,0.00006805286,0.002797705,0.000219554,6.957147e-7,1.293096e-7,0.0000012197313,0.00027497517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937445,0.000006867075,0.00021586345,0.00014278473,0.00009520023,0.00016483656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.000013530097,0.00022468255,0.00009728208,0.000033848588,0.000013867571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007910118,0.000048570888,0.00011254033,0.00017264832,0.001174622,0.00004797575,0.0007263838,0.000024619972,0.00005156783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117776115,0.000037847145,0.00006451793,0.001454022,0.0020008155,0.00026489267,0.000049599148,0.000057463945,0.000050802304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1905076e-7,0.000017206921,0.0006905858,0.0000013203447,0.000001062286,2.0430237e-8,0.00074810546,0.000004420055,0.00006989589,0.9980372,0.00029121374,0.00013804827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048896003,0.000045368775,0.032332238,0.0000035972716,5.8602126e-7,3.893934e-7,0.000057433637,0.000031824486,0.0006785032,0.9651933,0.0015516427,0.000056227036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011333201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.767326e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7345962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026016118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007115851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084576870","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100301","title":"A Disturbance of Psychoanalytic Memory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalytic theory; Misrepresentation; Representation (politics); Psychoanalysis; Disturbance (geology); Psychology; Meaning (existential); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07671639654811681,"score_gpt":0.39926922329093023,"score_spread":0.32255282674281344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084576870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.252498,0.00043100314,0.00037819438,0.020238675,0.00033111896,0.000260057,0.000014346415,0.000036726597,0.7258119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.000025945576,0.00020568908,0.00033281045,0.0001671538,0.000022251683,1.4547649e-7,0.000003796261,0.0007081141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992891,0.00004570621,0.00017794654,0.00015979983,0.00020182431,0.00012565404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.0000338025,0.00020262662,0.00021350956,0.000028408158,0.000014495718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002401665,0.000060333117,0.000121510624,0.00003532651,0.00022265683,0.000004732407,0.0006764074,0.00003812018,0.0002306519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005963393,0.000040345087,0.00013758472,0.00068817363,0.0009956504,0.00003305399,0.000019750873,0.000058274363,0.0000061927963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050301755,0.00047768283,0.010961892,0.000012550048,0.000060235056,2.692213e-7,0.0051149824,0.000003933845,0.0024425834,0.95963556,0.010295709,0.010944317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028835874,0.00011104222,0.07282426,0.00003091849,0.000026877504,0.0000033741508,0.0003369924,0.000015885791,0.00068553595,0.9129142,0.012618349,0.00014417796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005662724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7460361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007842157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012878729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36685157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085850893","doi":"10.1177/0048393105280869","title":"Back to the Drawing Board","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Nominalism; Idealism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Hacker; Presentation (obstetrics); Philosophy; Metaphysics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08825386071034368,"score_gpt":0.29491097736333677,"score_spread":0.20665711665299308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085850893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02621783,0.00006609356,0.0000019883405,0.3034038,0.0005733064,0.00013546564,0.000012438955,0.000013495283,0.6695756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98672205,0.0000017532593,0.000043506876,0.004483204,0.0066190017,0.0000051256784,1.6319515e-7,0.000004828828,0.0021203794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901617,0.00006657082,0.00017012084,0.00015965402,0.0003857936,0.00020167908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999625,0.00007763726,0.000087746135,0.00013675238,0.000041040155,0.000031812844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030388552,0.00009234495,0.00012261221,0.00002779511,0.0020583891,0.00012121428,0.00085223693,0.000021966318,0.0006501745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003669714,0.00004548837,0.00018579044,0.00016380899,0.0016329736,0.00017832895,0.00016050955,0.0001082887,0.0003204868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004958685,0.000030003986,0.000025796728,0.0000040270083,0.000007928736,3.7357818e-8,0.016312871,0.000024988156,0.000028087843,0.9741175,0.00797368,0.0014701235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007842703,0.000043761975,0.00026625986,0.00001998296,0.000015166828,1.9842692e-7,0.00060806,0.000028365885,0.0002145016,0.4174787,0.5811365,0.00011004865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007963811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032102343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96050423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019231009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026057349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088470243","doi":"10.1177/0048393108315688","title":"Book Review: Stadler, F., and Fischer, K. R., editors. (2006). Paul Feyerabend: ein Philosoph aus Wien. Vienna: Springer","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Social Critique","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.046289979392256146,"score_gpt":0.32926063736733185,"score_spread":0.2829706579750757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088470243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007518894,0.6609349,0.0000058381647,0.26673272,0.009166858,0.0011652462,0.00019805365,0.0000900965,0.054187365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49893862,0.4317785,0.000103121536,0.02650181,0.038684696,0.000068862304,0.000007437552,0.000060549166,0.0038564245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206614,0.0015932277,0.0011940815,0.0011362653,0.0028215197,0.0011887366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971408,0.00037079287,0.0011753055,0.0005153477,0.00044408685,0.00035366882],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036654563,0.00060689443,0.0013165738,0.00017611914,0.007745257,0.00017133527,0.0022579667,0.00047750887,0.0007109336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076349394,0.00047619393,0.0010148921,0.0025734867,0.011029162,0.0012654904,0.00049329834,0.00077421195,0.00007442149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631891,0.0005380281,0.0014494488,0.0005391231,0.0003580049,0.000014490468,0.019104626,0.0000029470427,0.000103023696,0.0360258,0.9407902,0.0010380412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004993391,0.0001988534,0.0021434883,0.0010379326,0.00054507685,0.000002903597,0.0008556732,0.0000141079,0.00007162462,0.05865066,0.9351452,0.00083514926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014013782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109336645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49141973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020382303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007717768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094546540","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370140","title":"The Manhattan Project and Its Long Shadow","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Manhattan project; Ideology; Shadow (psychology); Reading (process); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of science; History of science; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Politics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2115103338962021,"score_gpt":0.2923278322267995,"score_spread":0.08081749833059737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094546540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124283195,0.00095086393,3.4594402e-7,0.0077614686,0.0008912582,0.00022687437,0.000012279791,0.000028338402,0.8658454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983967,0.00002425219,0.000009374018,0.00023649153,0.00052662956,0.000007174071,7.073999e-8,0.0000033046158,0.0007960085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903846,0.00005991477,0.00014900522,0.00018416016,0.0003640251,0.00020444833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996243,0.000048036367,0.00015138242,0.00009652305,0.000057109497,0.000022665297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055308064,0.00009089427,0.00010181739,0.000039606395,0.0050987788,0.000097158685,0.000875946,0.000021504027,0.00007121394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034990404,0.00004687873,0.000085957356,0.00011482893,0.0057647955,0.0003517423,0.00013221183,0.00009087631,0.000009111048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006554744,0.000019455441,0.00014529462,0.000008684058,0.0000053725576,2.3235306e-7,0.037963837,4.328922e-8,0.000022195976,0.9610279,0.0002687324,0.0005316555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011133094,0.00020294088,0.0055817324,0.000036152218,0.000025064985,0.0000022452978,0.0034094027,0.000024575073,0.00022669745,0.9766249,0.013563256,0.00019166952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023139965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040740136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8741135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001313339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005926756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105562243","doi":"10.1177/0048393108323893","title":"Review Essay: Apprehending the “Social”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Subject (documents); Social thought; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.2729413813568088,"score_gpt":0.42160726872969573,"score_spread":0.14866588737288694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105562243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025856514,0.013516279,0.000008197374,0.255855,0.0006755927,0.0005309755,0.000008907598,0.00006565023,0.70348287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98866564,0.0041689007,0.000022414511,0.0054423045,0.0010951819,0.000015731186,3.515609e-7,0.0000041299895,0.0005853636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961354,0.0022879608,0.00028558835,0.00023217319,0.00073688064,0.00032196016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822587,0.0010857405,0.00042044633,0.00014232339,0.00008446834,0.00004116101],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005155356,0.00011864628,0.00026606565,0.000020418373,0.012281028,0.000037106565,0.001627723,0.00009778861,0.00020957731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001386172,0.000064336135,0.00035112872,0.0011317013,0.007811317,0.00040173967,0.0001857802,0.0002985518,0.000020891428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010055711,0.000048188238,0.0010356168,0.00004973217,0.000023057684,9.179857e-7,0.039492004,6.102713e-7,0.00002080795,0.95049304,0.00690579,0.0019201625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011991151,0.000042817304,0.0034511401,0.00019800823,0.00006194883,0.0000029415146,0.0067012073,0.0000015837015,0.0000232989,0.6210554,0.3681008,0.0002409344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003616011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019448755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9628091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051870607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033333237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99488884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110235649","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550806","title":"Noble Savages, Ignoble Colleagues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Anthropology; Anthropology of art; Applied anthropology; Sociology; Digital anthropology; Medical anthropology; Sociocultural anthropology; Four field approach; History; Art history","score_opus":0.08970826883070368,"score_gpt":0.37192776986197884,"score_spread":0.28221950103127513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110235649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018753987,0.0005801063,0.00003296049,0.1264,0.0022889478,0.00029492067,0.000014640689,0.00010541774,0.851529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945726,0.0000629629,0.0002975157,0.0011907596,0.001440602,0.000006716669,5.427785e-7,0.00000775069,0.0024205917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730545,0.0007363259,0.00024418352,0.00032052048,0.00097433774,0.0004191992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901587,0.00026502763,0.0003070407,0.00017983705,0.00016240662,0.00006981515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026431323,0.00013126692,0.0002560115,0.000043600598,0.0061287456,0.000052730735,0.001457239,0.00022392457,0.00025661069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009836939,0.00009455558,0.00020172136,0.00062104245,0.016029779,0.00023929779,0.00014264636,0.00025609494,0.00004918724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061675278,0.000059958307,0.0028108011,0.0000128879965,0.00001277604,1.816311e-7,0.03999711,0.00000877672,0.0002541196,0.9305421,0.025881404,0.00041372818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611905,0.00012078868,0.003224079,0.00004650181,0.000043582844,5.206075e-7,0.013418908,0.000016068077,0.0004773099,0.6670126,0.31504187,0.000336609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066741374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028937384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012123563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003707455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112385944","doi":"10.1177/0048393115583944","title":"On Post-Philosophical Sociology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sociology and Norbert Elias","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Vision; Social science; Sociology of knowledge; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.15338709587680774,"score_gpt":0.40080467659661717,"score_spread":0.24741758071980943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112385944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5249606,0.00011216503,0.0000016197278,0.23906763,0.0011194518,0.00015151362,0.000007697622,0.000044924618,0.23453443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393636,0.000009099503,0.000044373166,0.0044845836,0.0013339592,0.000008048927,7.172493e-7,0.0000052548244,0.00017760567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974583,0.00093456067,0.00021035771,0.00026879553,0.00073335756,0.00039465682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884593,0.0005358367,0.00018595645,0.00013724633,0.00019217523,0.000102839535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023088432,0.000118096366,0.00022575022,0.000059261172,0.002364114,0.000016902635,0.0011290654,0.00027442575,0.00008054434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001954806,0.00008011134,0.0002128355,0.00043393412,0.012221579,0.00013199208,0.00012871,0.00027718535,0.0000845028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003149603,0.00006206906,0.0024571952,0.0000016718187,0.00001225011,5.1678165e-7,0.028035209,0.0000056649196,0.000026004642,0.9671104,0.0021125984,0.00014492357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020149765,0.00018400818,0.004187675,0.000007835784,0.000012855995,4.5495995e-7,0.0031894557,0.0000022549948,0.00004199959,0.9903749,0.0016871927,0.000109858505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056432723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008595783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46897578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009017261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056062854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138179333","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352868","title":"From Popper’s Literary Remains","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Karl popper; Open society; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Critical rationalism; History; Art; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07531311394992102,"score_gpt":0.2781533643672711,"score_spread":0.2028402504173501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138179333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5019246,0.000083890656,3.0983557e-7,0.021737201,0.002451795,0.000065267595,0.000062326275,0.000030145444,0.47364447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942645,0.000001818296,0.00008909632,0.00090205955,0.004274061,0.000002945716,9.1281237e-7,0.0000042215834,0.00046037417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889326,0.000042430063,0.00017905819,0.00023177362,0.00046534673,0.0001881153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999521,0.000058034915,0.000156408,0.00017135547,0.000054977598,0.000038186583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003279168,0.00010035899,0.00013835252,0.000054938882,0.00246697,0.00010957232,0.0011382657,0.000039425726,0.00081491383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048319333,0.00006531976,0.00016414742,0.0001191161,0.00624688,0.00044040836,0.00011552551,0.00020558256,0.00003717242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004208871,0.00004280012,0.00026915738,0.000004056411,0.000004941465,2.899024e-7,0.044010866,1.9361903e-7,0.002810488,0.9511038,0.0012897734,0.0004594221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006712442,0.000034118784,0.0016752242,0.000014300318,0.000009499742,3.681862e-7,0.00045957722,0.000007358646,0.00030534322,0.9570785,0.04023577,0.00011279078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044305745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005542674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008254358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007160985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144496163","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352859","title":"“The Superorganic,” or Kroeber’s Hidden Agenda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Transcendental number; Evolutionism; Creed; Trilogy; Essentialism; Statement (logic); Immutability; Cultural system; Globalization; Philosophy; Anthropology; Social science; History; Political science","score_opus":0.105086051465614,"score_gpt":0.37930251035822354,"score_spread":0.27421645889260954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144496163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3898916,0.0005735328,0.0000024435287,0.28512964,0.0015802233,0.00037725107,0.0000104417695,0.0000839982,0.3223509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951807,0.00023534714,0.000044930734,0.0018219228,0.0012157318,0.0000040943646,2.5502897e-7,0.0000040517457,0.0014929333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977937,0.0005272694,0.00025161667,0.00023184855,0.00070967246,0.0004858986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912286,0.00038484993,0.00017734099,0.00016925113,0.000091812726,0.000053879812],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018789126,0.000111273475,0.0001872308,0.000027550608,0.007280609,0.000085852625,0.0017794085,0.00013229686,0.00011473122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006813967,0.00005811504,0.00019775468,0.00077508367,0.005158725,0.00017958468,0.000091900416,0.00017311162,0.000021889746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018618184,0.00004615057,0.0013517773,0.0000025221188,0.000014819678,8.823399e-7,0.03731977,5.3639235e-7,0.00025279078,0.947031,0.007711736,0.006249375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021928886,0.00017638822,0.015666991,0.000015863883,0.000030396366,0.0000011243712,0.014385578,0.0000036900344,0.00029526194,0.9212666,0.047713228,0.00022555236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006445804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010544705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070130045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046958454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153606095","doi":"10.1177/0048393115571251","title":"Einstein’s Philosophy Politely Shelved","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Einstein; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Theoretical physics; Mathematical physics","score_opus":0.08914872411777935,"score_gpt":0.327620300537809,"score_spread":0.23847157642002964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153606095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24677968,0.00009882133,0.00007367167,0.016297044,0.00045255542,0.00015731479,0.00004794725,0.000017527733,0.73607546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984989,2.7004583e-7,0.00014538453,0.00019169456,0.0009334241,0.000005265177,0.000002046609,0.000004595288,0.00021841282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989416,0.00012724666,0.00016261687,0.00015574618,0.00044428598,0.00016853213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952686,0.000079146135,0.00016386296,0.0001033054,0.0000756121,0.000051213374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004735407,0.000095314324,0.00013994201,0.000039953295,0.00048472136,0.000027986463,0.0004926992,0.000028988406,0.000043496297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002617616,0.00006526636,0.00017904754,0.00039307988,0.000997891,0.00021233932,0.00009588691,0.0001022565,0.000030233954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000796942,0.000052400977,0.005812481,0.0000030972992,0.000017096669,4.7968232e-8,0.0011778355,0.000037799964,0.000059650396,0.99217236,0.00025331654,0.00040596724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001897611,0.000034556975,0.004144621,0.000013854618,0.000011297735,1.1755731e-7,0.0003078698,0.000017992597,0.00031747433,0.9942389,0.0006381179,0.000085399675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013149995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.802644e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75171924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016875538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012812574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37281337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168133519","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296572","title":"Unwrinkling the Carpet of Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Extension (predicate logic); Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.16461753626215953,"score_gpt":0.3356673704731893,"score_spread":0.17104983421102976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168133519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21419376,0.00020992037,0.000012189306,0.009123869,0.0010907857,0.000097652635,0.000007845954,0.000013395028,0.77525055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817836,0.0000054661896,0.000032129803,0.00033787746,0.0012129772,6.9512873e-7,1.4707791e-7,0.0000031247648,0.00022921512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914306,0.000076006625,0.00019896898,0.00009488017,0.00033149956,0.00015559029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932534,0.00023911436,0.00022974919,0.000096276235,0.00009813884,0.000011403957],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017027996,0.000061354556,0.0001323093,0.000026715657,0.0012675916,0.000023449655,0.0005428832,0.000028748529,0.000025254954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008050823,0.00003211364,0.00015053015,0.0000957524,0.0044532693,0.00007966807,0.00007632064,0.00013249286,0.0000017744577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024794167,0.000013027896,0.00027980996,0.0000142284725,0.000011535223,6.4034715e-8,0.067584336,0.000004739231,0.00014102981,0.93160266,0.000057232053,0.00028884312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006678279,0.00004179719,0.00080311595,0.000029554609,0.000032859512,2.9144095e-7,0.014922145,0.000007804746,0.0016978905,0.9775354,0.004790846,0.000071505536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046837024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059754826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000839272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042768035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172157222","doi":"10.1177/0048393111400705","title":"On the Reliability of Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Criticism; Rationalism; Karl popper; Inference; Principal (computer security); Falsifiability; Reliability (semiconductor); Rigour; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Socratic method; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Power (physics); Law","score_opus":0.16740760774538962,"score_gpt":0.27485772450675544,"score_spread":0.10745011676136582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172157222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3899816,0.000015955098,3.9602338e-7,0.005191913,0.0005691715,0.000088462075,0.000008280962,0.0000088834095,0.60413533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992299,0.000001379497,0.000023899745,0.0004170683,0.00019056254,0.0000033903038,2.2953149e-8,0.0000019842687,0.00013177133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985471,0.00006562871,0.00019959264,0.00021537876,0.00078468275,0.00018765073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922884,0.00011041355,0.00024173733,0.00024165925,0.00015306035,0.000024294992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016330145,0.000080119484,0.00012192031,0.000070645954,0.0035486566,0.000027317816,0.0019933716,0.00001636638,0.00040346594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024999256,0.000038737784,0.0001333563,0.00034746775,0.04997829,0.00031960208,0.00014432175,0.00010119978,0.000011307831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007629483,0.0000635589,0.000068439906,0.000005618325,0.0000013493315,2.941479e-8,0.03988625,0.0000012197474,0.00023564506,0.95945954,0.00020862688,0.00006209297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003534909,0.00013877165,0.0018054713,0.00002024891,0.0000067808246,1.2027506e-7,0.0013952897,0.000010021474,0.002207798,0.99347174,0.00084351236,0.00006486552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000269655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027150048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60924834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025707399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001488151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253989905","doi":"10.1177/0048393115613570","title":"On the Hidden Thought Experiments of Economic Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Positive economics; Formal description; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24039315092660887,"score_gpt":0.3515014101262487,"score_spread":0.11110825919963982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253989905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34120587,0.00020624546,7.406949e-7,0.011132911,0.0013360751,0.00011594619,0.000017316615,0.000009010085,0.6459759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974604,0.0000037137636,0.000008911297,0.0005784968,0.0008715886,0.0000045985125,2.1736312e-7,0.000003664466,0.0010683964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991651,0.00023917278,0.0001518165,0.000106633335,0.00022763711,0.00010964373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935764,0.0002451565,0.00020378055,0.00013162913,0.000045317945,0.000016485996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011277014,0.0000696828,0.00013830855,0.000020318786,0.00057748286,0.000026730382,0.0006149396,0.000027723125,0.00009363653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000750063,0.000034816825,0.00012851332,0.000029771109,0.004087025,0.00008671996,0.000075949196,0.00008536539,0.000018672878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009598029,0.000027198768,0.00003075517,0.0000037980565,0.000015951995,2.3864091e-8,0.045460217,0.00000200714,0.000026610485,0.95301867,0.0013031991,0.00010198152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007512753,0.000068027686,0.000040809664,0.000011237127,0.000012141939,6.407811e-8,0.0075928527,0.0000031814084,0.0014246173,0.9882443,0.0024802207,0.000047450125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013083735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004498875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65625453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018708479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008969448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327498129","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370142","title":"Book Review: Tristram Hunt Marx’s General: The Revolutionary Life of Friedrich Engels, New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2009. 430 pp. $32.00 (hardback)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.05064452777446349,"score_gpt":0.3240260258995164,"score_spread":0.2733814981250529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327498129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020125149,0.24357668,0.000009692701,0.37957168,0.0017398421,0.0012823102,0.00019277628,0.00007139703,0.35343045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92020315,0.03810727,0.00034195682,0.03220084,0.0051106648,0.000036103866,0.0000034663924,0.000017389944,0.0039791814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976875,0.00037929788,0.0004636356,0.00031802457,0.0006830399,0.00046846643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987223,0.0003367257,0.00038145442,0.0002513509,0.00009238688,0.0002157962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022126078,0.0001616651,0.0003715477,0.000033232176,0.0017916473,0.000040569954,0.0012386305,0.00015668599,0.00066564966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087650964,0.00010432941,0.00025232005,0.00046960526,0.005224372,0.00030953204,0.00016327629,0.00035416157,0.000013360476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115153025,0.000072977404,0.00045507055,0.00008729479,0.000028528304,2.8018948e-7,0.002276058,8.5553864e-7,0.00020990084,0.45331034,0.5415858,0.0019613956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016518809,0.00004367892,0.0060088765,0.00008468261,0.00005280329,0.0000010854354,0.00032717607,0.0000069369494,0.00009557032,0.14442304,0.84861773,0.00017321698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026668669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014421115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.900078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035340716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009098812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329680548","doi":"10.1177/0048393115578807","title":"Book Review: <i>The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology?</i> by Roger E. Backhouse","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07997691493313532,"score_gpt":0.2804342540611901,"score_spread":0.2004573391280548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329680548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13544391,0.29630682,0.00014437716,0.16833684,0.0031247323,0.0012313456,0.00072429335,0.000053894244,0.3946338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830351,0.00420449,0.000042596417,0.011702455,0.00016570115,0.000015505175,9.129037e-7,0.0000070991364,0.00082613825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987541,0.000039608734,0.0005844674,0.00031475938,0.00006194662,0.00024512815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988248,0.00006733116,0.00067853305,0.0003199547,0.000053956745,0.000055427266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002567208,0.0001080545,0.00035527494,0.000067913534,0.0007961097,0.000030676605,0.001574038,0.0000485807,0.00015280754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034981055,0.00007188769,0.00016062414,0.00045799935,0.0055464753,0.0006077115,0.00022688661,0.0001014154,0.0000619855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017981538,0.000068106434,0.000858841,0.0000380928,0.00001868558,5.928026e-8,0.00080823223,0.00013437436,0.000034613542,0.8762813,0.121603325,0.00013635015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022896755,0.000077080214,0.000119735574,0.000049833005,0.000013121499,0.0000025464296,0.00006748487,0.00023757637,0.00079075823,0.76370883,0.23454203,0.00016205752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069234084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016357792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8475912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008495394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002132095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466757689","doi":"10.1177/0048393116654860","title":"Mead and the Trajectory of Anthropology in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Aside; Government (linguistics); Anthropology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Energy (signal processing); History; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08654197018307805,"score_gpt":0.38018280827436784,"score_spread":0.2936408380912898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466757689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42055285,0.0010724637,0.000019200392,0.5419525,0.00075898785,0.0004114061,0.000019021512,0.000018514897,0.035195082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980868,0.00052322616,0.0000214651,0.0010613037,0.0002197214,0.0000072060807,2.3099233e-7,0.0000032540663,0.000076781274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677527,0.0019390567,0.00024358115,0.00018872535,0.0005884231,0.00026495496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981615,0.0012783923,0.00029271966,0.00014355422,0.00010324008,0.000020602121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003859061,0.000095407806,0.00022542801,0.000070161936,0.0021643015,0.000014229634,0.0012358151,0.0001366659,0.00008637795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000875529,0.00003624345,0.000107675274,0.0007888041,0.08143074,0.00011862179,0.00008725231,0.00019135891,0.000001684156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000314777,0.000041380183,0.0038870906,0.000007751209,0.000012868373,2.7922857e-7,0.2212003,0.0000018510996,0.00011673124,0.7734104,0.00091582333,0.0003740904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085122156,0.000109410365,0.010536131,0.000052483403,0.00004450858,0.0000012569973,0.16042294,0.0000072996627,0.00017837208,0.8148885,0.012747305,0.00016058545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014155215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056654233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57753396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051455896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019909357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467929664","doi":"10.1177/0048393116657537","title":"Max Planck’s Remorse","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Planck; Physics; Psychology; Astrophysics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05356192502584946,"score_gpt":0.30938459455548056,"score_spread":0.2558226695296311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467929664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66955316,0.000013095277,0.00005805256,0.037788816,0.00094909826,0.000116841926,0.000031764972,0.000015936897,0.29147324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985202,4.956109e-7,0.00003663289,0.00008504359,0.0011060133,0.0000024171616,1.2644489e-7,0.000002086772,0.00024700927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922866,0.00003813007,0.00011339027,0.00014662367,0.00028872376,0.00018447397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970424,0.000040633447,0.00011279841,0.000096837146,0.000018920216,0.000026588525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028145398,0.00006395134,0.00009534691,0.000021502712,0.000466938,0.000022586437,0.0005532167,0.000016548782,0.0001649469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014172802,0.000029316101,0.00011160597,0.0002819961,0.0009079378,0.0001760465,0.00007095286,0.00003324829,0.000037079768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011950901,0.00004022477,0.095427565,0.0000020651569,0.000010887108,1.0585834e-7,0.00052166625,0.0000026552805,0.009497575,0.8855526,0.0027014297,0.0062313136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002410207,0.0000366953,0.017998334,0.000032431173,0.00000882841,1.5498273e-7,0.00026596524,0.0000042515567,0.006834037,0.9726375,0.0018255088,0.000115317795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015171875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003299804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.328967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000073491055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075593256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3591357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580295213","doi":"10.1177/0048393114553574","title":"Book Review: <i>Learn to Write Badly. How to Succeed in the Social Sciences</i> by Michael Billig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0919750085330256,"score_gpt":0.3852852308740106,"score_spread":0.293310222340985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580295213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006424348,0.004400671,0.00001200012,0.9166649,0.00071023655,0.00074717775,0.000010776659,0.000029607872,0.071000256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6581251,0.00058299873,0.00047327692,0.33677608,0.0012538364,0.00009763613,0.0000014390716,0.000010995948,0.0026786171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570453,0.0008149183,0.00032125943,0.00041208544,0.0021096135,0.000637565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911153,0.00022484224,0.00013971612,0.00014039215,0.00021408955,0.00016942587],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076146205,0.00015791743,0.00027803573,0.00010243244,0.0030212018,0.0002506401,0.002413724,0.00008320649,0.00007403281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016339937,0.00009931972,0.00014278533,0.0031823018,0.0028170324,0.00030905486,0.00021186992,0.00020764851,0.000055398636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005055666,0.00010176023,0.0005923279,0.000023302206,0.000004260383,2.698175e-7,0.070030734,0.0000012543703,0.000052061176,0.11139109,0.8169744,0.00082349055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012443046,0.00007707862,0.00083748985,0.00018309336,0.000015156343,3.650662e-7,0.01654389,0.0000013448202,0.000078125784,0.07257926,0.9093095,0.00025024757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007158634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022183392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6517008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017864263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008373026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727015543","doi":"10.1177/0048393115612037","title":"Book Review: <i>The Customization of Science: The Impact of Religious and Political Worldviews on Contemporary Science</i> , by Steve Fuller, Mikael Stenmark, and Ulf Zackarisson, eds.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Personalization; Social science; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06840583609972,"score_gpt":0.3396531001921719,"score_spread":0.27124726409245187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727015543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33778796,0.21017419,0.000004433367,0.21380138,0.0020469301,0.0021306842,0.000118312026,0.000030727966,0.23390538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953735,0.0011845933,0.000005007194,0.00294366,0.00018043435,0.000005990826,5.401218e-7,0.0000029205726,0.0003033762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790555,0.00017714202,0.00036652447,0.0002479655,0.0010441174,0.00025866856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868363,0.0001389868,0.00043525943,0.00020168108,0.00044054948,0.00009990356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038824852,0.00011325565,0.0002277396,0.00010420598,0.0017081375,0.00011730058,0.00086039153,0.000022051965,0.000020875359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005808913,0.00005024961,0.000089309986,0.0007261532,0.032782532,0.00052510155,0.00013895119,0.00010676777,0.0000014197886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000336494,0.00015364663,0.0012209979,0.000076708515,0.00001079832,3.9354827e-8,0.041606784,0.0000056039,0.00042307953,0.30632284,0.64960116,0.0005446584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028074102,0.00396919,0.016617164,0.0030850328,0.00030740013,0.000020500864,0.08218267,0.0018191596,0.004025442,0.45393673,0.42970392,0.0015253928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007146585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014654116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000666216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010222346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770478525","doi":"10.1177/0048393117741335","title":"Regretful Decisions and Climate Change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Economics; Incentive; Analogy; Greenhouse gas; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.41823636927092056,"score_gpt":0.3573625981778164,"score_spread":0.060873771093104156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770478525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73977447,0.00064739725,0.0000019198565,0.04735191,0.0006450159,0.00013924266,0.00028133322,0.000009455915,0.21114923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811363,0.0008665035,0.000078818026,0.00043841513,0.00045990566,0.000007760721,3.46081e-7,0.0000046525975,0.000029968694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993282,0.0000070297842,0.00022383164,0.00020444805,0.00003076001,0.0002057525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919426,0.000042638418,0.0004871804,0.00023754759,0.000009085703,0.000029282242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005917346,0.00007189505,0.00020019323,0.000053759602,0.0020709503,0.00012146928,0.00068259833,0.000049449627,0.000037566144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021012526,0.000059891598,0.000097309014,0.00006487674,0.0010028239,0.0003283102,0.00036194458,0.000056068096,0.000038347418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003031977,0.000012252897,0.085444465,0.000007926513,0.000004662916,8.670425e-8,0.0013303655,1.9181446e-7,0.0000018936481,0.91216755,0.00010589518,0.00092169235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012562415,0.00001909976,0.23770934,0.000021554122,0.0000032849025,7.620036e-7,0.00008142455,0.00011859728,0.000018953819,0.7603694,0.0014354062,0.00009652786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003751773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009107283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25833914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016311913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048145275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770668376","doi":"10.1177/0048393117742337","title":"Beyond the Self-Legislation Model of Democracy: James Bohman’s Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Reflexivity; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.10255606307960076,"score_gpt":0.35769966416454246,"score_spread":0.2551436010849417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770668376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04325368,0.00005985688,0.00035673284,0.15196887,0.0003846917,0.00048055267,0.000024211755,0.000035378995,0.80343604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652606,0.00001747388,0.0010263302,0.0014311415,0.0007398863,0.000013951605,2.9989383e-7,0.0000072318903,0.00023760679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972099,0.00058358273,0.00032988595,0.00027748884,0.0011713189,0.00042780323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.00048447095,0.00045793192,0.00045526,0.00017576653,0.000097190874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041563446,0.00014283662,0.0002562723,0.000052616528,0.009121947,0.00014103147,0.0029037194,0.00014995677,0.0000067298774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013662719,0.00008591483,0.00024450343,0.00033223248,0.006937611,0.00049155,0.00034750486,0.00026133063,0.0000049567275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000926541,0.00008101174,0.0003330383,0.0000157324,0.000019634574,3.131115e-8,0.024861028,0.00024297694,0.000059379574,0.9737734,0.00026943642,0.00033501978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008024505,0.000025501653,0.0016743301,0.0000172335,0.00005282675,1.2227827e-7,0.0014167298,0.0012717331,0.00014272855,0.99511737,0.00008437866,0.000116777206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053137465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006710135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005723334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005220476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2829595292","doi":"10.1177/0048393118785344","title":"Response to Shankman","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11992199939804714,"score_gpt":0.3076061002870782,"score_spread":0.18768410088903104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2829595292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3536899,0.00002421002,0.0000019139459,0.06530965,0.0012905246,0.00011153408,0.000016966533,0.000030771185,0.5795245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411446,3.1945837e-7,0.000052651794,0.0026362622,0.0018186483,0.000003829065,5.956492e-8,0.000003434593,0.0013703087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888134,0.00009332745,0.00014694061,0.00020616247,0.0004691721,0.0002030493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995688,0.000050935898,0.00009743277,0.00013489605,0.000104365405,0.000043569216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084931427,0.000081602964,0.000109956665,0.000090437636,0.0032976759,0.00007077673,0.0010470793,0.000019530322,0.0004659021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010511662,0.00005380239,0.00010253025,0.00022807754,0.0074355374,0.0002288981,0.00014013707,0.000055328725,0.00014798845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073491094,0.00002962205,0.00003546412,0.0000031240695,0.0000032628554,1.3936065e-7,0.058808293,5.743458e-7,0.0019399719,0.9336041,0.005212604,0.00028935607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012091203,0.0006251564,0.0017968616,0.000036843976,0.000011039126,6.772966e-7,0.0014800172,0.000008546285,0.0011431632,0.69060147,0.3039645,0.00021083577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009533761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014380552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6404246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027599615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007306791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902138217","doi":"10.1177/0048393118814765","title":"The Limited Rationality of Technology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Quackery; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10193172145835297,"score_gpt":0.2945589212820564,"score_spread":0.19262719982370344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902138217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20049636,0.000246511,0.0000020199248,0.1080522,0.001285505,0.00013727805,0.00002194674,0.000029283183,0.6897289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866635,0.0000038390895,0.00002391667,0.0002148751,0.00078408973,0.0000030183812,8.994418e-8,0.0000015690409,0.0003022497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991458,0.000045756147,0.00018302852,0.00012302416,0.00037241305,0.00012997955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936587,0.00006831155,0.00022717373,0.00013176863,0.0001958838,0.000011000432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055992045,0.000056527093,0.00009492625,0.000053583877,0.003900227,0.000034450295,0.0009877856,0.000025819618,0.00008116823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009870858,0.000029801193,0.00008910296,0.00025840083,0.027233902,0.00016109303,0.00009982028,0.00006356058,0.000008674491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000549729,0.000022581156,0.00011754826,0.0000032507191,0.0000047178246,1.4227195e-8,0.005381404,2.3076926e-7,0.00034068903,0.992973,0.00069994753,0.00045110795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047186764,0.00012923627,0.0010161817,0.000010908884,0.0000069011166,2.0929379e-7,0.00076909846,0.0000115359335,0.0009195127,0.9559597,0.041080493,0.000049078022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005603534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020970263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013206201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000771256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902683547","doi":"10.1177/0048393118811308","title":"Classical Cybernetics and Transhumanism: A Reply to Richmond’s Review of <i>The Nature of the Machine and the Collapse of Cybernetics</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Cybernetics; Epistemology; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Posthuman; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047731689158093275,"score_gpt":0.3331632144372865,"score_spread":0.28543152527919324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902683547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53618646,0.0022284414,0.000016020887,0.4414692,0.0010932971,0.0018285001,0.00018370936,0.000013826037,0.016980585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843793,0.00053407514,0.000056538447,0.014751599,0.00012610725,0.000008040212,8.684885e-8,0.000006170573,0.00013812027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974485,0.0004914082,0.0005303033,0.00029961127,0.0010569763,0.00017320634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982137,0.0005444065,0.0006205323,0.00039700232,0.00019106387,0.00003327491],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012376687,0.00012758121,0.00031282022,0.00003701177,0.00067385554,0.000017341987,0.001469168,0.00007252374,0.000017094011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022351316,0.00005691016,0.00014093658,0.0015093734,0.018467937,0.000049005226,0.0004819341,0.00036847548,3.6875798e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007348228,0.00022724723,0.0004164671,0.0008981367,0.000021168615,1.953389e-7,0.0069506387,8.6116745e-7,0.13454673,0.8522316,0.0038126847,0.00082077103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012096675,0.00060825906,0.010940218,0.0023224463,0.00023787539,0.000008445596,0.00016384422,0.00008089293,0.40423167,0.5700732,0.009846935,0.00027658607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041672556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003953235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44819283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000117007685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108586406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904530011","doi":"10.1177/0048393118810820","title":"Institutions as a Philosophical Problem: A Critical Rationalist Perspective on Guala’s “Understanding Institutions” and His Critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Institution; Rationalism; Relation (database); Critical philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy of science; Social institution; Critical theory; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.2973331015280518,"score_gpt":0.4699058722947969,"score_spread":0.1725727707667451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904530011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0716689,0.00013602604,0.00003707381,0.28686503,0.0005862901,0.00036398633,0.000051769686,0.000044801545,0.64024615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976111,0.000028082814,0.00033833878,0.0010638834,0.00089153775,0.00002471343,5.0845637e-7,0.000004783903,0.000037033198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984086,0.00017600536,0.0002347719,0.00033862473,0.000544705,0.00029725186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931103,0.00020156958,0.00009522806,0.000092776165,0.00021700993,0.000082412225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057107717,0.00013204357,0.00018418941,0.00009312763,0.008337139,0.00013224724,0.00042594387,0.00009131852,0.000051389266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084428303,0.00010890023,0.00010670983,0.00049621076,0.024846766,0.00042778734,0.00018897696,0.00015853024,0.000012897335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001172748,0.00011388503,0.0005274442,0.000004019662,0.000010496747,4.7182755e-7,0.020056635,0.0000012269887,0.00010713828,0.9790039,0.00015074447,0.000012281035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014659115,0.0001961824,0.00030183033,0.000045476536,0.00002910258,0.0000017218994,0.019627262,0.0000059510976,0.00014976179,0.9786062,0.0007440319,0.00014588135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020813965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010696285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92594224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078177615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007216717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913809085","doi":"10.1177/0048393118821185","title":"The Essential Ambiguity of the Social","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Individuation; Subject matter; Abstraction; Sociological theory; Subject (documents); Social science; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.09251651652523513,"score_gpt":0.3846651635164567,"score_spread":0.29214864699122156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913809085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5863377,0.00014064652,0.0000013452142,0.08034249,0.00148173,0.00033472135,0.000011129628,0.000015946696,0.33133432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766916,0.000029974242,0.0000055061537,0.00042105376,0.0008597197,0.000004389603,1.3730785e-7,0.0000032047433,0.0010068828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621,0.002051239,0.00028529085,0.00020146728,0.0009520416,0.00029995793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979359,0.0011585064,0.00057693827,0.00018823185,0.0001132872,0.000027166883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004815444,0.00010052547,0.00020285294,0.00001321039,0.0070203175,0.0000731717,0.0022412157,0.0001269566,0.00014609734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093919825,0.00004744959,0.00042307246,0.0007723534,0.008328592,0.00027570984,0.00034008585,0.00028062347,0.000013192021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003922301,0.000045328383,0.005161013,0.0000069432194,0.000022881017,5.5724374e-8,0.016941631,0.0000020402094,0.00040619232,0.975858,0.0004808808,0.0010358222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016674132,0.000048042166,0.026992,0.000015359285,0.000031209158,1.6157598e-7,0.010371609,0.0000040380305,0.00047806776,0.9369642,0.024802806,0.00012578072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082798995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016083969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41133144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034599816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032578432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99437016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923201854","doi":"10.1177/0048393119835159","title":"Testing Political Philosophies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Health care; Positive economics; Test (biology); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09717451848931953,"score_gpt":0.3569969141272697,"score_spread":0.2598223956379502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923201854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25012934,0.000013812708,5.327388e-7,0.06287347,0.0005779719,0.000107616346,0.0000026838745,0.000022398246,0.68627214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977284,0.0000012253537,0.00021991796,0.00065148884,0.00085593614,0.0000024315025,2.2030193e-7,0.0000031899096,0.000537177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984506,0.000108275155,0.00015815829,0.00015293715,0.0008228515,0.00030718738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946654,0.00020357867,0.000112223504,0.00005793202,0.0001243644,0.000035340738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070135534,0.00006822141,0.00010845885,0.00005504501,0.001213314,0.000048070404,0.00077066413,0.000047349637,0.00014911435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038213914,0.00004821579,0.0000961207,0.00062710914,0.0016214941,0.00021078197,0.000114319446,0.00008149758,0.00006642196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017362566,0.000014550578,0.030587554,0.00000447141,0.0000046699,8.292742e-8,0.0015699619,0.0000011586835,0.00019391895,0.96738845,0.00011208845,0.000121347824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076008466,0.000021008234,0.038648553,0.000031659252,0.000004676024,2.394448e-7,0.0009740474,0.000009145348,0.00026511712,0.95810854,0.0017654913,0.00009551019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004737959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002261306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74759907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057162957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002443266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9331953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945417839","doi":"10.1177/0048393119848651","title":"Book Review: <i>Raymond Aron’s Philosophy of Political Responsibility: Freedom, Democracy, and National Identity</i> by Christopher Adair-Toteff","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Identity (music); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02792936002231646,"score_gpt":0.33952392164024014,"score_spread":0.3115945616179237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945417839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113849,0.03788589,0.000011232518,0.20425339,0.0008568646,0.0012704962,0.0003048557,0.00006387372,0.6415044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830774,0.00078683504,0.00005608994,0.014751188,0.00043020918,0.000007800233,0.0000011617032,0.0000075132675,0.000881792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960319,0.0008113452,0.0005218055,0.000412805,0.0016893325,0.0005328351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983728,0.0006556464,0.0003206313,0.00021955823,0.00026639816,0.00016498104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003380534,0.00017011672,0.00042279885,0.00006078044,0.001192677,0.000043913315,0.0011183511,0.0001356513,0.0004716118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018095621,0.0001320544,0.00024500897,0.0006791112,0.008057341,0.0009710468,0.00026174847,0.00022228522,0.000025952004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029428042,0.000076423625,0.0010062249,0.00015012578,0.000013375399,1.5704137e-7,0.00048940675,6.5340924e-7,0.00046060176,0.9843934,0.013341774,0.000038391154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019351505,0.0000864637,0.0017161712,0.00029553342,0.000031400945,8.488916e-7,0.00017503108,0.000005335448,0.00051023084,0.9722424,0.024562161,0.00018089078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058937137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014605988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011858493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049063785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99464214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952348066","doi":"10.1177/0048393119853246","title":"The Problem of Analytic Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; CLARITY; Philosophy; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055144092311710476,"score_gpt":0.2620848180873566,"score_spread":0.20694072577564615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952348066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0820802,0.0004504759,3.6649047e-7,0.015958983,0.00096845685,0.00029635927,0.000024155439,0.000022545642,0.90019846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971375,0.00001703062,0.0000222067,0.0002925241,0.00095243665,0.000006264566,3.449439e-7,0.0000069305665,0.0015647662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981529,0.000100099314,0.00036377882,0.00025970428,0.0008369552,0.00028655116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989804,0.00014036839,0.0004312222,0.00026354298,0.00015032587,0.000034138982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008531826,0.00014080985,0.0002570026,0.0000928807,0.002204312,0.00008054009,0.0015907182,0.000030649495,0.00017886871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022957822,0.00007496243,0.00031031866,0.00031100577,0.006955732,0.0002896653,0.00015374977,0.00013887034,0.00004859124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010042424,0.00004566895,0.00040620484,0.000036294186,0.000018107508,6.664316e-8,0.010864929,0.000008359269,0.0001373822,0.9874475,0.0006889866,0.00033648018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015427497,0.00013344163,0.0005910943,0.000051556508,0.000030222389,3.9032835e-7,0.0010845726,0.0000385511,0.00011978865,0.95079046,0.04685695,0.00014871372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020598223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013220153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003826608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016056105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998289355","doi":"10.1177/0048393119894901","title":"Optimism for Naturalized Social Metaphysics: A Reply to Hawley","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Naturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08163381641922365,"score_gpt":0.4007705191296468,"score_spread":0.31913670271042316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998289355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29976657,0.00019982803,0.000032236243,0.561888,0.0031329494,0.0020434745,0.00007593795,0.00008659046,0.13277446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823539,0.0000097056745,0.00080144877,0.014419532,0.0012902911,0.000040518622,7.396777e-7,0.000008479865,0.001075347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784076,0.00021964699,0.00028396523,0.0002985997,0.0007949354,0.0005620914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910164,0.00030584025,0.00022371058,0.00012482928,0.00015578432,0.00008820486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016428032,0.000121971185,0.0003341323,0.00005677026,0.0030225124,0.0000904168,0.001059982,0.0000879805,0.000079963625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038365007,0.0000876049,0.00040529913,0.0007717816,0.0009036644,0.00024792925,0.00012293644,0.00011045834,0.000020409221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037624486,0.00003750563,0.0015594227,0.00007491365,0.000024999452,6.2130276e-8,0.026856115,0.00001063822,0.000058923535,0.96110964,0.009090059,0.0011400924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010199532,0.0001687279,0.023064852,0.00010293098,0.00008007135,2.1316036e-7,0.014617007,0.000052719603,0.00037815093,0.6953121,0.26459935,0.0006039272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003406038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022646257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009199608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040380427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010770414","doi":"10.1177/0048393120911130","title":"A Closer Look at the Business Case for Diversity: The Tangled Web of Equity and Epistemic Benefits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Epistemology; Inequality; Social identity theory; Positive economics; Public relations; Law and economics; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Economics; Social group; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16989109170196304,"score_gpt":0.355833169299732,"score_spread":0.18594207759776898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010770414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5836298,0.001356228,0.0000030008698,0.38399905,0.00031050423,0.0004875448,0.000077615965,0.000012941437,0.030123357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822706,0.00009063531,0.0000126036675,0.0012083647,0.0003068132,0.000009555952,2.3062255e-7,0.0000025318534,0.00014220031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870044,0.00025528198,0.00017420146,0.00020795503,0.00043612413,0.00022601997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889916,0.0005759611,0.00025199816,0.00009953874,0.00014002624,0.00003332903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015059821,0.00009200506,0.00020365277,0.000013241711,0.008148535,0.000026010594,0.0008949166,0.00006654859,0.000011829734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048141796,0.00004665342,0.00013177576,0.0005706702,0.007430545,0.00008281056,0.0017636662,0.0000764483,0.0000011515534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017894202,0.00007105543,0.048523486,0.0002025471,0.00016502454,0.0000058543046,0.2265103,0.00002240014,0.00016366302,0.7158879,0.0054056477,0.0028631887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001444544,0.00035829315,0.054963596,0.00009631972,0.0005868663,0.00003431319,0.096884035,0.000108153785,0.00051332096,0.83563924,0.008816764,0.00055457774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091216987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028207093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4145973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028831902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017245473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99527067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101802699","doi":"10.1177/0048393120967890","title":"Popper and Kuhn: A Different Retrospect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Humanity; Normal science; Enlightenment; Karl popper; sort; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.12528623192351035,"score_gpt":0.26189653336399116,"score_spread":0.1366103014404808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101802699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47579172,0.0003779553,0.0000011455799,0.13331057,0.0005247995,0.00012336647,0.000026060115,0.000044511635,0.3897999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674124,0.000009744382,0.000010680433,0.002035457,0.001071104,0.000001965127,1.3300541e-7,0.0000029862224,0.00012668903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911743,0.000034825905,0.00013019236,0.00020447817,0.0003684723,0.00014459893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997367,0.000022845217,0.0001043151,0.000060100967,0.000027700145,0.00004831432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001287465,0.000088824854,0.00014716713,0.000023780818,0.0019282822,0.00007460983,0.0005010424,0.000018522927,0.00021664627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000356311,0.000053427248,0.00009773877,0.00009066084,0.004431481,0.0002028702,0.00012169209,0.00009012036,0.0000074678687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007027811,0.00001912472,0.00057371584,0.000015560672,0.00000486919,1.8355273e-7,0.034795973,3.9659267e-7,0.0003865364,0.9628077,0.0012004353,0.00018844048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002895283,0.00043256985,0.0088907,0.000039257906,0.00003722733,9.805331e-7,0.0025689723,0.00008953714,0.00039287395,0.95785815,0.029088922,0.0003113006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004433951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028789185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52094954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012452944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002171517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107918712","doi":"10.1177/0048393120976116","title":"Science <i>sans</i> Subjectivity: The Sad Case of Imre Lakatos","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0829614894202098,"score_gpt":0.2775732555394789,"score_spread":0.19461176611926911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107918712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4842997,0.0003094285,0.0000018705807,0.036510248,0.0009728131,0.00024842354,0.000076744946,0.000035507863,0.47754526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731255,0.0000057061484,0.000011148232,0.0014825191,0.0011096483,0.0000040285668,1.2683563e-7,0.0000049953856,0.00006928422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998222,0.00009663737,0.00025577281,0.0003197938,0.0008204206,0.00028538957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991703,0.000107412554,0.00029247237,0.00020049665,0.00016232816,0.00006696695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088251516,0.00013045088,0.00022030958,0.00009532305,0.0043701874,0.00010908186,0.0016529167,0.00002144743,0.00009061913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001488829,0.00007268315,0.00017195921,0.00085396995,0.021236356,0.00050607475,0.00024650956,0.00016213446,0.0000083401455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009366259,0.0000502977,0.00013478447,0.000025654193,0.0000068048516,0.0000036348063,0.07425858,0.000006326062,0.0019141579,0.9225444,0.0007012379,0.0003447052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008217852,0.0011185189,0.00084392255,0.00012072558,0.00021071816,0.00007734327,0.044061705,0.00055602577,0.01138571,0.8434374,0.096377224,0.000988945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000562465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047134625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003225792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000451621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129608361","doi":"10.1177/0048393121995402","title":"Book Review: Review of King <i>Gods of the Upper Air. How a Circle of Renegade Anthropologists Reinvented Race, Sex, and Gender in the Twentieth Century</i> by Charles King","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06605063029345176,"score_gpt":0.30959961284984916,"score_spread":0.2435489825563974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129608361","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01718514,0.8424074,8.462721e-7,0.12237096,0.00056041934,0.0004239127,0.000032828306,0.0000050413346,0.017013444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84161437,0.14497232,0.000010920296,0.012824682,0.00016451479,0.00000639841,0.0000013543025,0.0000042272386,0.0004012043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830896,0.00033079466,0.00035063454,0.00018731505,0.0006606122,0.00016166709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.00007853077,0.00054979057,0.00020016004,0.00011379295,0.000017222605],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015312326,0.00009290274,0.00038150384,0.000031686788,0.00056144386,0.000010241303,0.0006183154,0.000025765808,0.00013224484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024610915,0.000047931328,0.00017483899,0.00030519458,0.0061756363,0.00016728132,0.000117269185,0.000119195385,1.5679876e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000306001,0.0008490827,0.007928878,0.04016025,0.00016886844,0.00000473592,0.30831155,0.0000024251033,0.016147092,0.10452998,0.50849575,0.0133707905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061806367,0.00021917452,0.0041241664,0.033923842,0.0003589533,0.000008531253,0.02240824,0.000008788586,0.0071928655,0.015580447,0.91519415,0.00036279162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021020432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006227644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001504323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010555359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215235437","doi":"10.1177/00483931211049770","title":"How to Put the Cart Behind the Horse in the Cultural Evolution of Gender","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Cart; Sociology; Division (mathematics); Social learning; Epistemology; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13565969767814762,"score_gpt":0.3911043388502115,"score_spread":0.2554446411720639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215235437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81776464,0.00093229336,0.0000053442404,0.13491079,0.0009438853,0.00027397505,0.000017730086,0.000005853907,0.045145504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980529,0.0000042410647,0.000015541207,0.000825408,0.0004976045,0.00003288117,8.054686e-7,0.0000030410315,0.000567609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824125,0.0007355418,0.00017880995,0.00022363798,0.00040257082,0.00021820315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993004,0.00014422738,0.00014196259,0.0003119491,0.00008732807,0.000014129259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010219167,0.000091507456,0.00012209285,0.00003290836,0.0010771906,0.000032403575,0.0011785958,0.000078734745,0.00009784046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067503155,0.000037929978,0.00016546543,0.0005355323,0.0021161435,0.00009746472,0.000105215586,0.00024099762,0.000011870751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031074578,0.00027733948,0.036183737,0.0000060848715,0.000037912356,0.0000024049452,0.08240553,0.000017436767,0.0011855628,0.86657387,0.012917563,0.00036146046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015137938,0.000054389224,0.84372985,0.0000078115445,0.00004128267,0.000012855006,0.020167217,0.0000010805737,0.000052896423,0.134432,0.0012848813,0.00006432058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013291302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030209494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80754614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032174867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006446155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82849884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254280","doi":"10.1177/004839310203200106","title":"A Touch of Malice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1680075636996223,"score_gpt":0.39996972535703207,"score_spread":0.23196216165740977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07043875,0.00006680909,0.00008615489,0.0306296,0.00024229806,0.00017021186,0.000003295996,0.000047650097,0.89831525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980771,0.000020279942,0.0011301907,0.00014742129,0.000174768,0.0000038617095,3.6156706e-8,0.0000020282191,0.00044429768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989778,0.00016725727,0.00016101547,0.00008687875,0.00048462697,0.00012246247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.000100649275,0.00020867185,0.000095148425,0.000058442263,0.000020907362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008337994,0.000044350647,0.00010394087,0.000043460455,0.00085753395,0.000017546437,0.00072155637,0.00003886269,0.0003436527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031891352,0.00003132255,0.000098346914,0.0005068904,0.0016002259,0.00008255495,0.000049664286,0.000058200752,0.0000042812694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.540608e-7,0.00006662204,0.0006364475,0.000011028025,0.0000028670806,1.1980979e-8,0.03417308,1.6398478e-7,0.00008856484,0.96211874,0.0021723057,0.0007298394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004160378,0.000022448929,0.00046674244,0.000032808613,0.000010042135,1.5924712e-7,0.0019959072,0.000025650934,0.0010688093,0.9901857,0.006078174,0.000071946495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006695316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005163538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92763835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018920138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047383634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6595545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251963311","doi":"10.1177/0048393111428793","title":"Bunge Nevertheless","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Egalitarianism; Politics; Democracy; Participatory democracy; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Socialism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Political science; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06605458671813488,"score_gpt":0.33071621174422705,"score_spread":0.26466162502609214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251963311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19265194,0.000039948543,0.0000052719734,0.07624455,0.00040581313,0.00018923312,0.000003477502,0.00002658877,0.73043317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974776,0.000010117646,0.0000521732,0.0011979513,0.000594688,0.000011960627,7.579197e-8,0.000002331376,0.0006531174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888223,0.0001587797,0.00014280305,0.00013785415,0.00034704668,0.00033130305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995839,0.000120799355,0.00009226522,0.0000814904,0.000056303663,0.00006522756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000536695,0.000062030245,0.00011742455,0.000025973883,0.0017328673,0.00006090088,0.00084359536,0.00006096117,0.0004445732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018205047,0.000042161882,0.00012596241,0.00034421406,0.003418731,0.00035932078,0.00010067644,0.00007662601,0.00008895579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.156552e-7,0.000024367482,0.0008818136,0.0000029934504,0.0000036548468,3.0640155e-8,0.0029321231,4.3698202e-7,0.000031023745,0.9934227,0.00081584154,0.0018845039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005758733,0.000015962474,0.00775524,0.00000795391,0.00000579085,8.744905e-8,0.0012650836,0.0000075942035,0.0001422599,0.975918,0.014739306,0.000085157604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006027831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019501537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80482566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003621058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016067612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255187153","doi":"10.1177/004839310203200306","title":"Kuhn’s Way","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1616693254135196,"score_gpt":0.26482444421695744,"score_spread":0.10315511880343783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255187153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040485643,0.00027789743,4.5505834e-7,0.02769427,0.0010386191,0.00007136453,0.000012789945,0.00003101133,0.930388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563926,0.000008014831,0.00001812078,0.0007676996,0.0012035898,0.0000031547909,8.60364e-8,0.0000031925608,0.0023568873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989478,0.000042571188,0.0001567539,0.0001782865,0.00048119086,0.00019342067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996451,0.000031975378,0.00013683867,0.00011204196,0.000046711335,0.000027348022],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026105755,0.000085824446,0.000121077304,0.000053913744,0.0028006767,0.000065367625,0.00091271685,0.000022392709,0.0016224382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029385299,0.000054786196,0.00015312068,0.00014142093,0.0059812344,0.00032674024,0.00007826747,0.00008734033,0.00009705519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011511364,0.000045320852,0.00004922043,0.0000066118487,0.0000036143927,1.6241766e-7,0.025400745,0.0000015489943,0.00009774031,0.9693046,0.004391639,0.0006976067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012991196,0.00010967859,0.0005405551,0.000025959933,0.000016893455,9.825986e-7,0.0010157595,0.0000841076,0.00019520575,0.8462836,0.15139315,0.00020418859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008154265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050276227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021391716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013372078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281397358","doi":"10.1177/00483931221080999","title":"Jeremy Bentham’s Social Ontology: Fictionality, Factuality and Language Critique","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Reification (Marxism); Sociology; Ontology; Social constructionism; Ethnomethodology; Pragmatism; Ordinary language philosophy; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08927775559887599,"score_gpt":0.33936268588367097,"score_spread":0.25008493028479495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281397358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6703908,0.00022198816,0.000001524335,0.105442435,0.0012676967,0.00016098125,0.00025116306,0.00003506829,0.22222833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720633,0.0000025147488,0.000009422073,0.0013939735,0.0011724094,0.000024329882,0.000005297425,0.0000036045644,0.00018209498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988804,0.0002598144,0.0001717941,0.00016805819,0.00037328465,0.00014663492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964935,0.00008598359,0.00015032875,0.00006358064,0.00003396505,0.000016818063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005860058,0.0000799055,0.00012850155,0.00004055389,0.0046856417,0.000058105117,0.0003694907,0.000024059053,0.00089430856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004130872,0.00006338966,0.000095220035,0.0000845004,0.0017589198,0.00018575136,0.00020762156,0.0001600255,0.000001997178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060284224,0.000066771194,0.00030680967,0.00001588244,0.000011145578,1.1183746e-7,0.10269785,9.536938e-7,0.000028986044,0.8944052,0.0021235798,0.0003367068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010252667,0.000044369648,0.0076486594,0.000003893793,0.000020090376,0.0000017334069,0.017880665,0.0000069262046,0.000046084493,0.96622413,0.007912613,0.00010829935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000748094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014717503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32681555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003887124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006507772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285728504","doi":"10.1177/00483931221096401","title":"Popper and Agassi at Odds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Odds; Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Individualism; Optimism; Perfectionism (psychology); Institutionalism; Karl popper; Methodological individualism; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.07430619505446288,"score_gpt":0.26131637104792727,"score_spread":0.18701017599346437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285728504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3188382,0.00046823223,1.1661594e-7,0.018704552,0.0012818313,0.0000941604,0.000047737456,0.000026479489,0.6605387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522734,0.0000056019308,0.000005111754,0.0010783877,0.0007051186,0.000009833247,4.6866253e-7,0.0000040293203,0.0029640961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988285,0.000083565814,0.0001334626,0.00020354397,0.00056991354,0.00018105505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996908,0.000032586355,0.00012474424,0.00009600072,0.000025988342,0.000029937892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042866034,0.00008085414,0.00012253014,0.00006806951,0.0077095283,0.000048143396,0.0006179122,0.000010266707,0.00081189466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000141980145,0.00005622655,0.000104406034,0.00012893765,0.004267222,0.00016429315,0.00040929296,0.0001001249,0.000007429007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006554136,0.000035518286,0.00031970016,0.0000066701177,0.000005059341,3.1766874e-7,0.035416234,0.000003557991,0.00014019072,0.9592922,0.0044824,0.00029160496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021327303,0.00016912693,0.0024046486,0.000007886906,0.00002626719,0.000003830181,0.0045293863,0.000036984788,0.000054955264,0.6147944,0.3775157,0.00024357322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020420954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015120911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67638916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071505376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059954007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320917298","doi":"10.1177/00483931221148428","title":"Robert K. Merton, Cudos and Magical Thinking in the Age of Covid","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Scope (computer science); Magical thinking; Epistemology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Disease; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Computer science","score_opus":0.15128235740566956,"score_gpt":0.45391052135400983,"score_spread":0.30262816394834025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320917298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75458765,0.00007881076,0.0000081988555,0.10624095,0.000270418,0.00052239985,0.000005871332,0.00001990692,0.1382658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703664,0.000023748766,0.000017925862,0.0025073197,0.0000935667,0.000017810982,5.212779e-7,0.0000022943852,0.0003001929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985318,0.0005657357,0.00020543886,0.000115515475,0.00039747547,0.00018399338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941367,0.00034734173,0.000114088616,0.00009788991,0.000013914732,0.000013101832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022674876,0.000051067782,0.000121620564,0.000062969266,0.00091754214,0.000008890347,0.0005544462,0.00003385674,0.000021801834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014582992,0.000025925217,0.00004894773,0.00064287905,0.00059220055,0.0000617603,0.00031270256,0.00012690967,0.00000811081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005554252,0.00007495322,0.02123149,0.00023968519,0.000016823982,0.000005059445,0.21361247,0.000012246596,0.00038893725,0.7566895,0.0065044034,0.0011689281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032774205,0.000056602203,0.09971694,0.00013846392,0.000018900506,2.0565481e-7,0.025545312,0.00004725791,0.000014480732,0.8630588,0.010999553,0.000075753174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037115702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001332614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24244899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011749086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059026504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7057085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379880780","doi":"10.1177/00483931231181641","title":"What Is Non-Inevitable?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"York University","keywords":"Epistemology; Intuition; Social constructionism; Sociology; Strict constructionism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12686539088672863,"score_gpt":0.40999355776085766,"score_spread":0.283128166874129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379880780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84633344,0.00014475743,0.000001683601,0.06769344,0.0034792372,0.0001623591,0.000016282318,0.000046573183,0.082122214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584514,0.000022350749,0.000017732249,0.0005543154,0.00030610073,0.00001104858,5.528483e-7,0.0000040151103,0.0032387462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992394,0.00004296504,0.00011535303,0.00016623612,0.00023913775,0.00019689325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971473,0.000027715692,0.0000741138,0.00013542954,0.000028611976,0.000019391608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033471387,0.00005937899,0.00009687959,0.000055772154,0.00056136755,0.0000384411,0.00047631,0.000044723296,0.00038667454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008018875,0.00003882321,0.00012275473,0.0009709201,0.0006050173,0.00017845033,0.000095933014,0.000062497,0.00028187383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025032232,0.00047244367,0.053478066,0.00004820347,0.000083640276,0.000006869391,0.054792527,0.000013771155,0.0045349044,0.6566477,0.19113833,0.038758542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309528,0.00021944696,0.5617868,0.000104256316,0.00008005763,0.0000030941708,0.01038134,0.000029619674,0.0015376151,0.41690943,0.0080564,0.00036102583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113408285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005166206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5083087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008169387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021783893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43176422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385755367","doi":"10.1177/00483931231181930","title":"Instrumental Rationality in the Social Sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Rationality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Subjectivism; Philosophy of science; Simple (philosophy); Counterexample; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Ecological rationality; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3416999638884397,"score_gpt":0.39650368724829543,"score_spread":0.05480372335985573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385755367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79951024,0.0000056518734,3.3854144e-7,0.15571228,0.00047500263,0.00012878008,0.000016780627,0.000018304316,0.044132642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957658,0.0000055336504,0.000011328651,0.0038171916,0.0003471137,0.000011531728,5.738889e-7,0.0000017401517,0.000039160586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979262,0.0003503065,0.00019397268,0.00028998594,0.000979846,0.0002596857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995992,0.00018987586,0.00012399332,0.00006372444,0.000011814888,0.000011390505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015129718,0.00008288184,0.000102726306,0.000077800345,0.0026036298,0.000049707054,0.0013187502,0.00003883293,0.000029703326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001453147,0.000045911565,0.000114525894,0.0018557905,0.0044504707,0.00019653187,0.00016191152,0.00013746713,0.00003726418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017924942,0.00020007428,0.010621345,0.000009631411,0.00000302387,0.0000018383491,0.0053550587,0.00004753249,0.012434292,0.966674,0.0037925092,0.0008428265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021099874,0.000067476794,0.23635013,0.000010602071,0.0000037225973,0.000003554751,0.0010036548,0.000087016415,0.0028247156,0.759033,0.00030532325,0.00009978294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057522062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015719625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2257288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025229916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008253971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394754256","doi":"10.1177/00483931241246069","title":"Phenomenology, Cultural Meaning, and the Curious Case of Suicide: Localizing the Structure-Culture Dialectic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Sociology; Dialectic; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Negation; Meaning (existential); Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Qualitative research; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046442409287695635,"score_gpt":0.3533118385948806,"score_spread":0.30686942930718497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394754256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612756,0.008226279,0.0000062621434,0.075861044,0.0017130233,0.0007062693,0.000049890987,0.00007530815,0.05208634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984278,0.00022204852,0.000019839983,0.00032826807,0.0008288919,0.000005087378,5.3073086e-7,0.0000049028263,0.00016259601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.0005334626,0.00023724443,0.00022221947,0.0004811533,0.00028735268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.0003320076,0.000186075,0.00009549306,0.00010861747,0.000032836015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009793096,0.00013561729,0.00022524825,0.000022667617,0.00412824,0.00019275158,0.0007601892,0.00010945082,0.000024937139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000303527,0.000053660613,0.0002016387,0.0010191228,0.012255373,0.00022133402,0.00016729649,0.0002755653,0.0000010184174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084001285,0.0000061792703,0.0001717648,0.000019372586,0.00004204599,0.0000026232378,0.1745476,0.000009020905,0.00011333358,0.82287055,0.00022502923,0.0019840954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019644313,0.00003925586,0.00023751134,0.00004786904,0.00013781292,0.000033606397,0.057640098,0.00025373386,0.00005067128,0.9394341,0.0017899309,0.0001389653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070229196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005045901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13715225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053404336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013345396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396780530","doi":"10.1177/00483931241248823","title":"Book Review: A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Digital Education and Society","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber College","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03510781408413879,"score_gpt":0.3372863656263324,"score_spread":0.30217855154219364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396780530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016372956,0.21384816,0.0010620359,0.55964226,0.003514579,0.0004217997,0.00002180929,0.00021989745,0.22110574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601129,0.005029918,0.0023855707,0.116365544,0.0012811201,0.00008331563,0.0000027068281,0.000013460727,0.014725461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848545,0.000060599632,0.00018048513,0.00033954208,0.00072949904,0.00020440282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945253,0.00003386577,0.00008566802,0.00032802645,0.00007570421,0.000024182009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005916227,0.00010056414,0.000115422336,0.000011224279,0.0012618067,0.00064125226,0.0028340728,0.000040821033,0.000027691329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007301533,0.0000478675,0.00028143046,0.0024723287,0.0018032186,0.0008596341,0.00038214203,0.00012515597,0.000039465955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.855884e-8,0.000017019727,0.000004034064,0.000049831066,0.0000056934646,1.1744022e-7,0.0031431522,9.943005e-7,0.0000069509356,0.5719395,0.42332628,0.0015063066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014249779,0.0000115118755,0.00004990805,0.00016724413,0.00000810702,0.0000026104367,0.00014030303,0.00012003135,0.000055207787,0.36990228,0.6294619,0.000066634886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015808477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016114342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005941675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000256352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406648406","doi":"10.1177/00483931251314866","title":"Reply to Moehler","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06725412280497726,"score_gpt":0.3599288364064658,"score_spread":0.2926747136014885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406648406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0488504,0.000052369804,0.000016648382,0.27902985,0.0009538802,0.00013923972,0.000002995047,0.000022161857,0.6709325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98144954,0.000008535642,0.000080424,0.0156094665,0.0003494152,0.0000023350324,7.801748e-8,9.803852e-7,0.002499237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985984,0.00012651096,0.00010371584,0.00015060762,0.0008300874,0.0001906662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965274,0.00007406874,0.000053533433,0.00009485496,0.000087388136,0.000037415095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015683221,0.000047920075,0.0001032372,0.00006707487,0.002003667,0.000042102987,0.0013535359,0.000036426158,0.00006770276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041066462,0.00003453157,0.00009338823,0.0013472756,0.0020091746,0.000095495874,0.00021623058,0.00006774743,0.0000126745435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006767599,0.000025471632,0.0053310175,0.000007653215,0.000010117729,1.9888667e-7,0.017171033,0.0000064806636,0.000044607437,0.9262335,0.048468813,0.0026943437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001885736,0.000055290555,0.016771112,0.00010274998,0.000042910982,6.021031e-8,0.028022585,0.0000024971941,0.00038036355,0.6364778,0.31781736,0.0001386703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018724815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012829847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9325991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044327127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022081326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408727117","doi":"10.1177/00483931251327336","title":"Foresight as Consolation: Kant on the Capability of Future Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; Futures studies; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Theology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08244627859248173,"score_gpt":0.3258579510535721,"score_spread":0.2434116724610904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408727117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1198005,0.00012571862,0.0000015829065,0.19686344,0.000695219,0.00015672467,0.000019831801,0.000009887509,0.6823271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682903,0.000004453249,0.0000034974605,0.0022511017,0.00080753566,0.0000047243884,1.8956689e-7,0.000002098479,0.00009734793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901885,0.0001729577,0.00020064974,0.00013648748,0.00035980906,0.00011124001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912685,0.00043389198,0.00016838615,0.00015411752,0.000107639135,0.000009122965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000910977,0.000078642115,0.00014106401,0.000035536454,0.0015141611,0.00004236852,0.0005888176,0.000046654764,0.00023736297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018343268,0.00003784298,0.0001660952,0.00014553862,0.004314582,0.00006251091,0.00009616447,0.00018555266,0.0000030599465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021032285,0.00003599065,0.00005899401,0.00002308934,0.00001561165,4.9277713e-8,0.007471354,0.0000027500391,0.000023695691,0.9920747,0.00011412743,0.00015858846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052396488,0.00004671715,0.0004234211,0.00006109059,0.000014977312,5.8731864e-8,0.001132784,0.00002183186,0.00022336292,0.993929,0.004049528,0.00004482993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006263053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006673395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8770285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014448616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010769507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414242482","doi":"10.1177/00483931251380495","title":"Collective Intentionality, Individualism, and the Place of Children in Social Theorizing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social ontology; Centrality; Power (physics); Social relation; Element (criminal law); Social reality; Ontology; Social power; Social analysis","score_opus":0.03777468178755705,"score_gpt":0.34592308331728283,"score_spread":0.3081484015297258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414242482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.829641,0.00020134843,0.0000027060528,0.031204058,0.00020175391,0.0002143576,0.000011343814,0.000005469224,0.13851799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991288,0.0000025111497,0.000016326312,0.00039636632,0.00010441651,0.0000074273507,4.2550653e-7,0.0000016776369,0.0003420251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989571,0.00037562207,0.00018749194,0.00015520472,0.00021141478,0.00011316654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951863,0.00024498889,0.00015623614,0.00004456918,0.000029890514,0.0000056945732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001391314,0.000062193874,0.00016724809,0.00006693423,0.00066384685,0.000015878068,0.00037287682,0.000041918935,0.000023809644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120531775,0.000035786205,0.00008626915,0.0006484127,0.0020544631,0.000029128216,0.00019524283,0.00013699401,6.47203e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405013,0.00004448867,0.076388836,0.000005166007,0.00005266324,3.7544073e-8,0.026135499,9.1087827e-7,0.000014655237,0.89657587,0.00027088748,0.00043693397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047708835,0.000010950164,0.6422142,0.00002423744,0.000010751649,2.667907e-7,0.0009765753,0.000001039682,0.000021597789,0.35620394,0.000029927298,0.000029421528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022222873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021887854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56582534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031486143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013884566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75697553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}