{"meta":{"query_hash":"384bf4616681","filters":{"venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences"},"cohort_total":94,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":94,"exported":94,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/384bf4616681","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Philosophy+of+the+Social+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1968804489","doi":"10.1177/0048393104266860","title":"Clarifying Some Misunderstandings about Social Systems and their Mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09964198033789998,"score_gpt":0.2597748134622898,"score_spread":0.16013283312438983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968804489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017172724,0.02619295,0.06322061,0.871217,0.007444466,0.00003283712,0.00011820592,0.0001471527,0.01445402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72092015,0.0499382,0.053727407,0.13681148,0.028983857,0.00028570535,0.00020704728,0.00042865778,0.008697543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761463,0.015317625,0.0013140237,0.0024701243,0.0039451267,0.0008067815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8831403,0.09066576,0.007384108,0.0076652556,0.0097391065,0.0014054611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05833042,0.0014982697,0.0020585114,0.0047949757,0.0075118146,0.014260904,0.006109517,0.011837883,0.0031646052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08247357,0.0009059897,0.0015741303,0.0045916573,0.04600453,0.030566858,0.0070928647,0.022198305,0.0006783631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023655784,0.000015413547,0.0002948926,0.0001816294,0.000029959892,0.0001423684,0.010836577,0.000738395,0.00012654564,0.9700696,0.011183259,0.0063577523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015148514,0.000014852936,0.00029587184,0.0002272042,0.000017249668,0.00015917371,0.003739418,0.0008765081,0.00022924227,0.9558174,0.038581368,0.000026549933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033752471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002613437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05833042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055082003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035515958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30848444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970662364","doi":"10.1177/004931032002007","title":"Book Review: Popper’s Open Society after 50 Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Open society; Relevance (law); Karl popper; Epistemology; Philosophy; Critical rationalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541793923242905,"score_gpt":0.28128497655856555,"score_spread":0.20586703732613648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970662364","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002267137,0.5858584,0.000294573,0.3050273,0.09006624,0.00001880974,0.000109191256,0.000035087607,0.01836371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061402353,0.5493917,0.00039856476,0.20065586,0.14008361,0.000086218526,0.00019741022,0.00012940467,0.10291697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845195,0.00042956945,0.00007532025,0.00019704594,0.00074850465,0.00009754948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991627,0.0052257776,0.0004058456,0.00021886255,0.0019425286,0.00058004144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024456007,0.0008680835,0.0014614209,0.002535379,0.001575122,0.006545029,0.0016321174,0.006614703,0.012837061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014538257,0.00043232826,0.00044666565,0.0046516047,0.0035589107,0.008467333,0.002278451,0.0069351895,0.007089313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047891795,0.0000029205617,0.0000150459055,0.00020282339,0.0000027751103,0.000018527156,0.000046373436,0.000020778702,0.0000101342175,0.0037422215,0.98159754,0.014336074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044653616,0.000004284205,0.000072569994,0.0003963956,0.0000043115315,0.00008965045,0.000055705696,0.000012524599,0.000017434215,0.0031589523,0.9961785,0.0000051378993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038028806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068299165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012837061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043309797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052730865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042944193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972279905","doi":"10.1177/0048393107307809","title":"Rethinking Systems Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Premise; Sociology; Suspect; Systems theory; Ontology; Variety (cybernetics); Mainstream; Reductionism; Social system; Philosophy of science; Metatheory; Cybernetics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30601108637351815,"score_gpt":0.4407086502948644,"score_spread":0.13469756392134624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972279905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010194683,0.058281295,0.22832242,0.58105433,0.014306342,0.00013055766,0.00018955943,0.00042933007,0.107091494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66698265,0.049958155,0.12941822,0.101813264,0.021078931,0.0006410795,0.00028630573,0.00083567726,0.028985754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96514547,0.022939526,0.0014205711,0.0038829737,0.005426675,0.001184775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95148635,0.03759025,0.0010433332,0.004916766,0.003954476,0.0010088482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041527856,0.001421405,0.0019299568,0.004923459,0.005750838,0.015843019,0.0033257883,0.0080577945,0.0055163223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03443299,0.00086638745,0.002173287,0.0023103752,0.06433093,0.029365364,0.0102591375,0.019949274,0.0015297316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006204725,0.000008452521,0.00009302301,0.00008921909,0.000016223972,0.000027112785,0.0014500725,0.0005263188,0.000068313675,0.98802894,0.00333631,0.006349707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060212083,0.000009485328,0.000049612903,0.000100728284,0.0000048468128,0.00002086413,0.00037591252,0.0005819341,0.000060175716,0.95481944,0.043959193,0.000011902986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004886421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032472503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041527856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01245103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092154415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21962291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977591471","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352877","title":"Current Philosophy of Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; State (computer science); Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11150013339253372,"score_gpt":0.3093601942171576,"score_spread":0.19786006082462387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977591471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00122318,0.106120765,0.046374995,0.26025224,0.012549058,0.00007790418,0.0003044187,0.00026378053,0.5728337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21156657,0.23236325,0.05363623,0.13217227,0.030687759,0.0007688027,0.000957475,0.0005557449,0.33729187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561214,0.0017213258,0.0002191645,0.0006354179,0.0016109223,0.00020092551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932661,0.0031142908,0.00030318345,0.0009765723,0.0016921654,0.0006475913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006845677,0.00057348784,0.0009926783,0.0016648055,0.0038786836,0.010348272,0.0018552286,0.0054283566,0.027479507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009774926,0.000441332,0.0006674452,0.0022384152,0.018731996,0.009518574,0.0030239767,0.010801459,0.010982265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004861866,0.000014210669,0.00005802265,0.000107321845,0.00000505939,0.000011771951,0.0005022495,0.00008299614,0.000048121965,0.9236666,0.05791369,0.017585179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044483354,0.000007927377,0.000073383235,0.0002527641,0.0000023667758,0.000037320628,0.00022033948,0.00017284404,0.00002785364,0.49735034,0.50184447,0.0000059228532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00242987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020608578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066807875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073113735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091928065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978669899","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352867","title":"Cartwright on “Economics”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Positive economics; Economics; Economic methodology; Causality (physics); Variable (mathematics); Philosophy and economics; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07228404409529134,"score_gpt":0.2623460942732963,"score_spread":0.19006205017800498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978669899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011105095,0.078582264,0.0078544,0.45079476,0.016351715,0.000027186565,0.00022184933,0.00018842766,0.4448689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08667743,0.05924348,0.0064308573,0.17131844,0.018475281,0.00017553386,0.0002477813,0.0005625685,0.6568687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816066,0.000790124,0.000042641295,0.0003421105,0.00049515854,0.00016943355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972356,0.0014758296,0.00011757197,0.00020131996,0.0007186287,0.0002511079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001808159,0.0008571383,0.0005136881,0.0015119748,0.0028461409,0.0045536943,0.00072903145,0.0030281215,0.021776132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066303853,0.00032648494,0.00047105513,0.0015360935,0.006693054,0.007085048,0.0018599692,0.008541577,0.0060284114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009943212,0.000006513571,0.0000771144,0.00003074803,0.0000036960375,0.000037676866,0.0002883124,0.00011334282,0.000030376792,0.59630615,0.3927718,0.010324352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035296098,0.0000032255707,0.00010270829,0.000116219926,0.0000015888288,0.000029930694,0.000112103335,0.00015698544,0.00004719765,0.15539642,0.8440245,0.0000056673834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014607858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014618507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021776132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049978625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036109195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07284844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979836458","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269199","title":"Systemism, Social Laws, and the Limits of Social Theory: Themes Out of Mario Bunge’s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social philosophy; Philosophy of social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Social theory; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Social science; Social relation","score_opus":0.088542083237987,"score_gpt":0.2760504615533304,"score_spread":0.1875083783153434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979836458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032003142,0.1124434,0.07309699,0.43803406,0.0019720395,0.0000611129,0.00006957282,0.00012664977,0.34219316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925213,0.024343146,0.016318116,0.015829002,0.0023038234,0.0002566888,0.000029373925,0.00015242546,0.015554507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938233,0.0043488815,0.00009963977,0.0004760811,0.0009377289,0.00031441124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448895,0.0044329395,0.00020502256,0.000363384,0.0002491117,0.00026059273],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008778166,0.00069936155,0.0010141645,0.0024217695,0.0054811873,0.008656748,0.0012975452,0.0038388202,0.002196999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067521366,0.00053884136,0.0006467464,0.0023422777,0.06328749,0.012223247,0.0060924576,0.0063444683,0.00025786526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036011713,0.0000032290175,0.000049696802,0.000022051729,0.0000021004726,0.000014880035,0.002118808,0.00012965576,0.000019656902,0.9944981,0.0017086016,0.001429676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031183074,0.0000023520267,0.00007469706,0.000049425777,0.0000011333769,0.000012868706,0.00055977266,0.00019563938,0.000016447417,0.9758301,0.023251357,0.0000030550148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005668196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043800967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008440473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004019904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061240256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980996868","doi":"10.1177/0048393108328149","title":"Racism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Garcia; Epistemology; Psychometrics of racism; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Humanities","score_opus":0.08717438339944503,"score_gpt":0.4051591126937392,"score_spread":0.3179847292942942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980996868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024027225,0.0031275947,0.0031330537,0.045171533,0.0010349316,0.000028995993,0.00007231278,0.000025524067,0.92337877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791154,0.0024290716,0.0013754024,0.020214628,0.00077275024,0.000046430236,0.000093580886,0.000042875636,0.09590984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961564,0.0016407237,0.00009050111,0.0005897757,0.0009146375,0.00060804293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980446,0.00046367806,0.00026394057,0.0003335411,0.00054906163,0.00034524285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026272833,0.000257388,0.000246161,0.00084246416,0.0064920085,0.00378674,0.0004373332,0.0020701804,0.0134376455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004502901,0.000103821934,0.00026171154,0.00057946757,0.010230002,0.0022916105,0.0032086053,0.0032086892,0.00134482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007744924,0.0000152104485,0.0012776396,0.000028761013,0.0000042484558,0.000053697917,0.006907401,0.000049468836,0.0001242596,0.95900244,0.018702451,0.013826599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000547207,0.0000194085,0.0037220565,0.00016170443,0.0000073288948,0.0003094649,0.006642938,0.00013095561,0.00022157456,0.19094591,0.7978208,0.000012394341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006378259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076066977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134376455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028602309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019478665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982051560","doi":"10.1177/0048393112470247","title":"Introducing Philosophy of Social Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Nice; Philosophy of science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08881262458303243,"score_gpt":0.3677232200409536,"score_spread":0.2789105954579212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982051560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026676313,0.11330716,0.06000176,0.16695787,0.015967056,0.00014571253,0.00017894035,0.00035990702,0.6404139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27299532,0.18911916,0.08413906,0.076337375,0.023593808,0.001311759,0.00041777303,0.0006127329,0.3514731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953082,0.0030076501,0.000113486196,0.00032300307,0.0010007265,0.00024696352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961515,0.0027847113,0.00016625409,0.00017998414,0.0003727377,0.0003447249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004097751,0.0009010123,0.000767296,0.002124957,0.004097654,0.007945308,0.0011426215,0.003450392,0.010210886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005196672,0.00050913275,0.0007635483,0.0020659596,0.017127585,0.006859083,0.0031009524,0.009364206,0.0034221103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033064118,0.000010351519,0.00008775486,0.000110884306,0.0000057879,0.00004317541,0.0018326393,0.00020337469,0.000055269127,0.94640285,0.03739959,0.013844937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037395052,0.00000994269,0.00010870486,0.00023608899,0.0000018915842,0.00006634496,0.00081577885,0.00025433462,0.000024105373,0.5928003,0.4056724,0.0000062813456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026710161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035253407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010210886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005889608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005508214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0427323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987803148","doi":"10.1177/0048393106293458","title":"On Reviewing <i>Machine Dreams</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.061149330055181035,"score_gpt":0.2596452582306499,"score_spread":0.19849592817546885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987803148","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001572067,0.3853283,0.00700205,0.24629083,0.19059895,0.000062869665,0.00016334327,0.0003091729,0.16867238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022034695,0.36219266,0.0054807556,0.09088974,0.27485693,0.00015694415,0.00039309953,0.00066610205,0.24332905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980716,0.000463221,0.00009919367,0.00017077115,0.0010997674,0.000095489646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923475,0.0037180674,0.0005557451,0.00018238695,0.002821319,0.00037503548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018867248,0.0006712542,0.0007175738,0.0036855359,0.001749617,0.00612988,0.00085364294,0.0017338092,0.008400806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012166124,0.00028816075,0.00043925634,0.0035288502,0.002679599,0.006418088,0.0009910789,0.0034320366,0.0067850747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073387814,0.0000061178334,0.00006090912,0.00022924622,0.0000054119755,0.000032816293,0.00018299269,0.000057449506,0.00008694569,0.017887948,0.9533158,0.028127126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014026623,0.000008584756,0.00019044633,0.00035346713,0.000004430603,0.00007676389,0.00017298877,0.000062151186,0.00007123521,0.0055695176,0.99348116,0.000007754179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015184646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004338493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008400806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019112516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016031777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02810347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988272152","doi":"10.1177/0048393109334584","title":"The Advantage of Theft over Honest Toil","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Doctrine; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Reading (process); Notation; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.05055420441763033,"score_gpt":0.2940570747563595,"score_spread":0.24350287033872917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988272152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030205505,0.00894274,0.044294517,0.2483604,0.0041447594,0.000033935947,0.00011038302,0.00045926354,0.6634485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913055,0.0015481343,0.0051629264,0.019311637,0.002014449,0.000046053494,0.000031447744,0.00036449402,0.05846575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902531,0.0048073656,0.0003393145,0.0012819787,0.0022641243,0.0010541333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885257,0.0058902777,0.00092250307,0.0027429115,0.001253741,0.00066499034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009504113,0.00054127566,0.0005821835,0.0010695176,0.005632698,0.009117707,0.0009751609,0.0047562355,0.007039393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024006454,0.00032984535,0.00052499323,0.0006752766,0.04716375,0.01894184,0.006132347,0.008031394,0.002052114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025510672,0.000005008114,0.00012886013,0.000021439731,0.000004479413,0.00004242198,0.0020726172,0.00004753497,0.000074731885,0.98373485,0.009292444,0.0045500295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014375255,0.00002023095,0.00013821878,0.00009024156,0.0000116794345,0.00016511619,0.0012087667,0.00023549506,0.00047761644,0.85863435,0.13898458,0.000019278401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021030526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021270744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009504113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003949113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022783645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050263107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993021320","doi":"10.1177/0048393109350750","title":"Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11325813001614508,"score_gpt":0.3995810182643606,"score_spread":0.2863228882482155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993021320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10663839,0.005484569,0.37749755,0.1776638,0.001013288,0.00026744936,0.00057990855,0.00018117174,0.3306739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95750034,0.0011883558,0.028152816,0.0075812293,0.0005328113,0.00022207941,0.0000937741,0.00004645383,0.00468215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844328,0.007893214,0.00081817404,0.0021571121,0.0036652423,0.0010334846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415782,0.040038787,0.0059965434,0.008244207,0.003059169,0.0010831214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022065865,0.000587265,0.0010198477,0.003643545,0.005802659,0.009152647,0.0038000294,0.0077583077,0.005307478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04698908,0.0007343482,0.000963528,0.0031020832,0.055809088,0.019052869,0.008126734,0.011062834,0.0004916715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023246578,0.000003861558,0.00023507485,0.000011628523,0.000003943658,0.000050934203,0.00046055607,0.000102277685,0.000014366254,0.9978866,0.0003644546,0.00086409424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056458903,0.0000063171296,0.00018832894,0.0000480937,0.000005197271,0.00010033601,0.00036213078,0.00066100503,0.0001026129,0.9899464,0.008563509,0.000010412605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033622219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035763395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022065865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004855007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002856079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116696835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993592588","doi":"10.1177/0048393107303779","title":"Slaves in Plato's Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criticism; Philosophy; Politics; Presentation (obstetrics); Reading (process); Law; Epistemology; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09458041162055938,"score_gpt":0.38767070286473393,"score_spread":0.2930902912441745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993592588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05951911,0.0059169005,0.00766426,0.04228765,0.00084568886,0.00003742493,0.00005958796,0.000048269332,0.8836211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212495,0.002415988,0.0024223183,0.006604698,0.00070766895,0.00006133555,0.000027636452,0.000031880547,0.06647894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990938,0.0003830929,0.00002923655,0.00011784353,0.00020592044,0.00017015928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955374,0.00022034904,0.000047604353,0.00005423947,0.00006590259,0.000058051442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016118002,0.0002169727,0.00021795135,0.0006471006,0.005066881,0.0028972975,0.00029128144,0.0013532373,0.0035696828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024071396,0.00015815909,0.00018161107,0.0006097537,0.01725592,0.0035063014,0.001826874,0.0033582859,0.000317372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034127775,0.0000033725285,0.00007536533,0.0000033716633,3.963199e-7,0.000017789722,0.0023254484,0.0000318734,0.000023384393,0.9933437,0.002369101,0.00180277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016733762,0.000015582,0.0008379184,0.00006624179,0.0000029578312,0.00004264026,0.0015291318,0.00031766022,0.0001277989,0.7951048,0.2019307,0.000007813676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005483501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060557597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005483501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024368463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025788832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017680645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996115560","doi":"10.1177/0048393113510467","title":"Is a Post-philosophical Sociology Possible? Insights from Norbert Elias’s Sociology of Knowledge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sociology and Norbert Elias","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of knowledge; Sociology; Epistemology; Relativism; Agency (philosophy); Historical sociology; Medical sociology; Social geometry; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0681591685265393,"score_gpt":0.361854158619655,"score_spread":0.29369499009311567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996115560","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036736865,0.047482323,0.034580287,0.4547789,0.0020167104,0.000027094155,0.000046889923,0.00006943662,0.42426148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95068365,0.013785757,0.0043044025,0.01249843,0.0018597022,0.0000685299,0.000021419539,0.00005025953,0.016727755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478936,0.003758922,0.00011670061,0.0003667558,0.0006626639,0.00030558172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98783606,0.009847184,0.00054123776,0.0006149218,0.0006132439,0.0005473031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080129495,0.0005189783,0.0006536184,0.0028575475,0.0065076044,0.012051821,0.0011284611,0.0045725163,0.002774937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008722695,0.00033048433,0.00038378208,0.002065767,0.078053065,0.017853228,0.005192882,0.0061823544,0.0005086205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023363616,0.00000488317,0.000029470273,0.000013269048,0.0000011345531,0.000018049432,0.002612006,0.00006755083,0.000011129407,0.99524057,0.00083726837,0.0011623888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003336204,0.000003380607,0.00004419889,0.0000558149,0.0000010480145,0.000017962928,0.0016542504,0.00013855804,0.00002759991,0.9644541,0.033596903,0.0000029302566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045423754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034897646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012051821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010928366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051397937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079291165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997982957","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370151","title":"To Dismiss “The Received View”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Logical positivism; Rest (music); Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.08288585972574118,"score_gpt":0.30175063637984423,"score_spread":0.21886477665410303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997982957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033880821,0.0062342794,0.009110803,0.76292884,0.07613505,0.000025188581,0.000099604724,0.00017456851,0.1419036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14884192,0.008471,0.009728081,0.5753228,0.10215185,0.00017425926,0.00023983417,0.00071501086,0.15435529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430376,0.0018616479,0.00019672966,0.0007092768,0.0025063136,0.00042215709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237484,0.002826531,0.0005230235,0.0008264936,0.002914998,0.0005341379],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066406564,0.00070622115,0.00069313863,0.0012066483,0.004494508,0.009106234,0.0029529093,0.0063053737,0.010473117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023514494,0.00023160336,0.0006426714,0.00090390793,0.015784923,0.011502705,0.0035731718,0.02298645,0.008532535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032452037,0.000019681916,0.00016023159,0.00010292838,0.000015173208,0.00005639784,0.0025292977,0.00005773148,0.00016468391,0.64278895,0.3445163,0.009556195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019085615,0.000039014194,0.00022315036,0.00023718353,0.000017000599,0.00012964153,0.0029988072,0.00030325938,0.000328371,0.19904044,0.7966445,0.000019458723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016074788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039004597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026468893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029207044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035119593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008973693","doi":"10.1177/0048393113497677","title":"Pornography Stumps Analytic Philosophers of Art","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Photography and Visual Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Pornography; Transcendental number; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07644789654378577,"score_gpt":0.2994290937012157,"score_spread":0.22298119715742992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008973693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010107539,0.02962908,0.027516162,0.2264966,0.0069701984,0.00003815729,0.000089645226,0.00020322151,0.69894934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48331708,0.039832,0.014700152,0.059848983,0.010210099,0.00015296033,0.000097044176,0.00071754714,0.39112407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.0010763609,0.000088589586,0.00023586859,0.0006934613,0.00013563369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933207,0.0046904543,0.0003534018,0.0007467359,0.00066374475,0.00022509543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033847145,0.00061713444,0.0004895278,0.0018265549,0.0062397304,0.009982241,0.000747739,0.0038936,0.010038916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010912416,0.0004825801,0.0005037563,0.0015788754,0.035975415,0.016178362,0.0041034706,0.009547362,0.002888526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007964402,0.000006767524,0.00007209989,0.000038333725,0.0000024301546,0.000028383642,0.0039853584,0.000044266537,0.000040965355,0.9695702,0.018472726,0.0077303736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064782184,0.000017247332,0.0001768353,0.00018555594,0.0000052178307,0.00013448545,0.0037726464,0.00016362299,0.00020167395,0.5746387,0.42068797,0.000009568965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027991084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053731794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010038916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022530283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002218886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03358352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015544292","doi":"10.1177/0048393103262550","title":"How Does It Work?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":501,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Coercion (linguistics); Epistemology; Politics; Control (management); Generalization; Work (physics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09585866243548809,"score_gpt":0.26360977157753107,"score_spread":0.167751109142043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015544292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00922338,0.019690894,0.030357342,0.68322253,0.0075214193,0.00012748774,0.00020531389,0.00052216445,0.2491295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6073571,0.02004132,0.030823233,0.23092817,0.005955412,0.0006708128,0.00037194553,0.0011569622,0.102695145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858425,0.0069238096,0.0004122735,0.002943281,0.0021167719,0.0017612895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850085,0.0065833637,0.0011599213,0.0028363098,0.0023538088,0.002058153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021143245,0.0010159023,0.0013286435,0.0018534263,0.0061572944,0.01318478,0.0026533573,0.009869156,0.020664107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025774691,0.00044076148,0.0012329568,0.0012367995,0.035808038,0.021551175,0.0063497946,0.007788462,0.01132125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219641,0.000084184125,0.0021965192,0.00035609395,0.00008579998,0.00013964484,0.00411094,0.00038853538,0.0002517462,0.89664674,0.0478322,0.047835372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033947075,0.000055073073,0.00052744546,0.00037207542,0.00004594906,0.00015217086,0.0027670716,0.00030419795,0.00033875753,0.7700321,0.22533923,0.000031889598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003569337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022417447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005176797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010138075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11181748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017448876","doi":"10.1177/0048393103257195","title":"Irrationalism with a Human Face","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychological Treatments and Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.1603037265753106,"score_gpt":0.44008201565844923,"score_spread":0.2797782890831386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017448876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047980398,0.002259083,0.14805627,0.10892169,0.0026023719,0.00009655208,0.00007031398,0.00024054339,0.6897728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498002,0.0005805842,0.020366654,0.008811247,0.0011925187,0.00015084427,0.000021669382,0.00006646969,0.019009806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937284,0.0039198706,0.00014435926,0.00053065317,0.0014332864,0.00024342176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943944,0.0032527847,0.0003379214,0.0010806912,0.0006511866,0.00028304482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004833805,0.00045563353,0.00049717654,0.0010118715,0.002946709,0.004798613,0.0009701914,0.0032629706,0.006293387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015197668,0.00025357696,0.0006161183,0.00043240678,0.032192536,0.007357251,0.0032448946,0.008810997,0.00050066144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011187128,0.000014081792,0.000088639754,0.000009078589,0.0000033883596,0.000026660766,0.0006186545,0.00011207893,0.00006706826,0.9952323,0.0013306068,0.0024861936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004767094,0.000005591878,0.0000686566,0.000007868309,0.0000021934686,0.000036996928,0.00018806536,0.00029085716,0.00004428679,0.9948303,0.004516962,0.0000034873049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010558487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009426043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006293387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018528337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014000696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025563896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017692326","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296540","title":"The Conceptual Construction of Altruism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Selfishness; Counterintuitive; Altruism (biology); Positive economics; Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Axiom; Social psychology; Experimental economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08451515193369666,"score_gpt":0.37816313947321256,"score_spread":0.29364798753951593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017692326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08538841,0.010784514,0.2547819,0.080613516,0.00086120697,0.000102777565,0.00015621645,0.00013154154,0.56718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97085416,0.001300436,0.017817188,0.0030953365,0.00023168465,0.00018252882,0.000034383622,0.00003140727,0.0064528934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938699,0.004418787,0.00012844395,0.00062170165,0.00068289135,0.00027820945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968837,0.0017206058,0.0004215989,0.00041215378,0.00028266708,0.00027916513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007151275,0.00041259333,0.0004134016,0.0013323303,0.0027704241,0.0035117054,0.0015119785,0.0023080187,0.0032000807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005829083,0.00029732255,0.000494133,0.00086044753,0.032481376,0.004972099,0.0039772084,0.0030819322,0.00037575245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015278421,0.000002009274,0.00004173221,0.0000060296134,9.277522e-7,0.000003728572,0.0005035049,0.00005922531,0.000023163895,0.9987037,0.00021322667,0.0004411932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049137093,0.000009663499,0.0002231738,0.00002874974,0.0000028003801,0.000053786785,0.0004018148,0.00046658627,0.00005951202,0.9825968,0.016146788,0.000005434226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095424784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069104676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007151275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035679908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015983217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019621904","doi":"10.1177/0048393106289793","title":"Boas and Holism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Ethnography; Space (punctuation); Structure and agency; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06533879391618563,"score_gpt":0.38622697834032893,"score_spread":0.3208881844241433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019621904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04365349,0.02316824,0.029873677,0.17255564,0.0024449371,0.000073239666,0.00018015695,0.00018120043,0.72786945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95720285,0.0025921685,0.0048512025,0.009347799,0.00090936286,0.00008103262,0.000050108676,0.00014992808,0.024815599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963637,0.0022523226,0.0000678073,0.0005535923,0.00040400316,0.0003586274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973537,0.001563579,0.00018813537,0.00041082434,0.00026721228,0.00021665858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048083,0.0004374134,0.00043141306,0.0020045005,0.0075028543,0.005624275,0.00083975267,0.002233972,0.006199432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004372936,0.00026116666,0.00045391876,0.0010150388,0.046942543,0.006849047,0.003498518,0.005571309,0.0006329426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056219337,0.0000039365045,0.00006343153,0.000017467893,0.0000022153,0.000011525836,0.002241017,0.000029781266,0.00001818235,0.99348855,0.0030460018,0.0010723573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010076839,0.0000059182325,0.0002025642,0.000058270376,0.000003334137,0.00003243235,0.001678575,0.00014837917,0.000063326734,0.91483283,0.08295907,0.0000053281087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070637655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073659476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008366912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008366912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002234421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060706496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019746670","doi":"10.1177/0048393111408779","title":"Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Ideal type; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Pluralism (philosophy); Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14102738325876052,"score_gpt":0.3624656669870574,"score_spread":0.22143828372829688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019746670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05689,0.0054971245,0.291804,0.032158855,0.0021001257,0.00013044124,0.00024998985,0.00021434993,0.61095506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264272,0.0018937928,0.05135141,0.0015086657,0.00075564935,0.00018225482,0.00012983495,0.00016131645,0.017589947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316037,0.0038338753,0.00032931584,0.00063301675,0.0015580418,0.0004853015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939459,0.0032345597,0.000530577,0.00082833116,0.0011201565,0.00034047008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013701878,0.0008461068,0.00073424744,0.004731204,0.004016183,0.00877873,0.0013625356,0.002253175,0.0036262758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018256286,0.0005308821,0.0008710477,0.0023537155,0.024441604,0.017813599,0.0050125024,0.0032681467,0.0007049926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037385194,0.000001897479,0.000036833317,0.000005421005,0.0000010128422,0.000012495731,0.0006817999,0.00012229613,0.000013329688,0.9978885,0.00039113307,0.0008415818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021740382,0.0000019333124,0.000021614267,0.000013636744,0.0000012806939,0.000012650101,0.00035128134,0.0003696126,0.000032940912,0.9916155,0.0075742905,0.000003134735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021363012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016992366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013701878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058551016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025733036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072463274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020412513","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000307","title":"Is There an Addiction to Sex and Love?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Addiction; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Criminology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08720380855771481,"score_gpt":0.38833102827179716,"score_spread":0.30112721971408235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020412513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42165086,0.029310416,0.015792767,0.2579054,0.0017755727,0.000058500453,0.00018961089,0.000104263476,0.27321267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594125,0.010700124,0.0014446304,0.018183794,0.0009380884,0.000046686106,0.000039368046,0.000028266208,0.0092065865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989215,0.000484871,0.000033846918,0.00010766308,0.00032016737,0.0001319673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936871,0.0040659374,0.00059092283,0.0005351322,0.00041384538,0.0007070336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018282093,0.00013186934,0.0005352127,0.0006625168,0.001057358,0.003457982,0.00054392184,0.0026740602,0.007520205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078031197,0.0002070116,0.00028449052,0.00069503166,0.01763558,0.0047662635,0.0015417088,0.0047285287,0.00049687945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014270465,0.0002987804,0.016071409,0.00021480319,0.00007536111,0.0003154784,0.005770507,0.00013020387,0.0011757617,0.90857357,0.0046744,0.06255689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049638176,0.00016775956,0.038896404,0.00030330798,0.00004157547,0.0014629117,0.007472453,0.00055969047,0.000348332,0.891449,0.059207965,0.00004096855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001139985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010321583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007520205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006955506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008839361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02515757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021664452","doi":"10.1177/0048393107311459","title":"Book Review: Warwick, Andrew. (2003). <i>Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics</i> . Chicago and London: Chicago University Press","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Natural History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering physics; Media studies; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.029584291099176825,"score_gpt":0.22452075085310982,"score_spread":0.194936459753933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021664452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008209258,0.9445772,0.00033441567,0.017530227,0.01644016,0.000030429226,0.0009362195,0.00008810524,0.01998116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014602902,0.89073706,0.00042378952,0.011931034,0.009356233,0.00006123422,0.0011545949,0.00008330904,0.08479246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994593,0.000050990206,0.000058607762,0.00009529078,0.0002714289,0.000064376945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970583,0.0010735554,0.00025443465,0.00009336777,0.00126922,0.00025118707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008411795,0.0018904111,0.002441256,0.0059472597,0.0008969085,0.00315472,0.0028545829,0.002864086,0.0795633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004393302,0.0008288638,0.00073063915,0.010153289,0.0011415972,0.0043663397,0.0015136393,0.004454339,0.07074647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012341482,0.000004681708,0.00002815185,0.0009874929,0.0000090292215,0.000020041509,0.00002833525,0.00003171268,0.000035968085,0.00072776224,0.9471072,0.05100732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008046472,0.000004206329,0.00017599625,0.0011483898,0.000013302256,0.00013743986,0.00002764439,0.000009944333,0.00003105085,0.0006452692,0.99779224,0.000006448152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011654619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026117934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99910307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002626475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003905534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26616573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10110631720804651,"score_gpt":0.36467742220890004,"score_spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023979196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039511472,0.01574586,0.29473007,0.13079645,0.0022871336,0.00027144005,0.0003627888,0.00072887196,0.515566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78382754,0.010957519,0.16266856,0.0115942815,0.0016102907,0.0012108146,0.00030152348,0.0004635857,0.027365876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870618,0.0066668265,0.000728582,0.0017603964,0.003030656,0.0007517979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838726,0.0071913684,0.0014229645,0.004377385,0.0019732828,0.0011625349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019383404,0.0010754459,0.0012329292,0.002692905,0.0036739768,0.009819469,0.0033101551,0.004504724,0.009977351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129364,0.0008337963,0.001542244,0.0022135854,0.04285786,0.020291125,0.0074011534,0.007233058,0.0024547556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003223661,0.000019060275,0.00033879536,0.000100027406,0.000014238219,0.000012852723,0.00081943575,0.00010061244,0.000045738572,0.9798314,0.0017995096,0.01688604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130892895,0.000015253361,0.00025742335,0.00013175725,0.000010543028,0.00005895747,0.0007789527,0.000461405,0.000089263885,0.98260087,0.015565775,0.000016724061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013678871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018513023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019383404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038190284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036899874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10251045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026018820","doi":"10.1177/0048393108328147","title":"Constructing “The Economy”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Mainstream economics; Positive economics; Economic methodology; Economics; Mainstream; Neoclassical economics; Power (physics); Economy; Heterodox economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Applied economics; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07170740387913957,"score_gpt":0.2651064265427812,"score_spread":0.19339902266364165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026018820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023775762,0.014489746,0.32901,0.08069183,0.0031844,0.00018131615,0.00032880149,0.0003523857,0.54798585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7668145,0.0141063575,0.16173033,0.011958199,0.0019529145,0.0005204098,0.00043504513,0.00036956993,0.04211272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709845,0.0018877739,0.000073996074,0.0004490744,0.00029934166,0.00019136611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977429,0.0010145814,0.00020801487,0.00048460014,0.0003968968,0.00015295956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046739806,0.0006991149,0.00067134725,0.0025068664,0.0031492333,0.006970159,0.001407394,0.0024720714,0.0058156517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006601097,0.000387543,0.00056942843,0.001838409,0.023171233,0.012444237,0.0037709256,0.004565999,0.0018688954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010241915,0.0000023438813,0.000056626857,0.000009243199,0.000001911388,0.0000068201502,0.00026354825,0.00011324676,0.000016089569,0.9970241,0.00087973714,0.001625312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018947867,0.0000030686108,0.000065121625,0.000047273545,0.0000022002791,0.000015464291,0.00034936352,0.00037972306,0.00004988265,0.95803344,0.041048497,0.0000041779576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002694624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017927916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004744995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029530466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026172606","doi":"10.1177/0048393110368043","title":"Dissent about Descent: Evolution, Design, and Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Pace; Descent (aeronautics); Epistemology; Sociology; Connection (principal bundle); Mathematics education; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.06282315409969418,"score_gpt":0.3053252946581667,"score_spread":0.24250214055847252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026172606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09288014,0.006963244,0.13834949,0.11998836,0.0011585226,0.00016528218,0.00009429134,0.00016143202,0.64023924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92398685,0.0015574784,0.02420877,0.0032110743,0.00016166441,0.00020079361,0.000038520433,0.00007367332,0.046561114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631304,0.0027614285,0.000086486725,0.00033400208,0.00032922236,0.00017588658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705964,0.0017444593,0.0001848972,0.00041475025,0.00032250857,0.00027374024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005411495,0.00030552948,0.00027076248,0.00078551995,0.0025493065,0.0053219274,0.0010001947,0.0015486527,0.009918075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008598959,0.0001476632,0.00025736567,0.0006654584,0.023627933,0.004460276,0.0025383374,0.0016838064,0.0008501626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015970707,0.000013572219,0.0006220337,0.000028753278,0.000003232622,0.000025553874,0.0022921741,0.00031635017,0.00006835924,0.9785579,0.0017362868,0.016319867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013949921,0.000024733372,0.00039343434,0.00005952826,0.0000043279756,0.000030128238,0.001653589,0.000514988,0.0001795713,0.94817966,0.048939854,0.0000061447154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014849161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021637885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023572394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033179224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030912446","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000301","title":"Cultural Evolution, Reductionism in the Social Sciences, and Explanatory Pluralism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Autonomy; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0954617405030361,"score_gpt":0.2954537666560501,"score_spread":0.199992026153014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030912446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14051233,0.019176107,0.24750657,0.25771853,0.0019363948,0.00007690776,0.00010030366,0.00016483861,0.33280796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97688216,0.002065675,0.013136136,0.0030016557,0.0006253192,0.00008054002,0.000047164875,0.000043370706,0.0041178525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908119,0.0068840794,0.00020554819,0.00048528137,0.001211609,0.00040159957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872241,0.010135154,0.0007619096,0.0009075053,0.00057011785,0.00040128914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008614354,0.00046696913,0.0007144058,0.0024733879,0.0038138127,0.0060334937,0.0012967978,0.0030522603,0.0019889134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009977205,0.00031971923,0.0009167364,0.0021502809,0.040967982,0.007984689,0.0058149486,0.0061199814,0.00017809104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020766945,0.000004705736,0.000100530204,0.000010543912,0.0000037810134,0.000019685252,0.0008429445,0.00028605224,0.000019088098,0.99741614,0.00023545708,0.0010588882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002036391,0.0000011284266,0.0000477228,0.000006663125,0.0000012624467,0.000010268109,0.00015985448,0.00034347377,0.000015001116,0.99736434,0.0020467893,0.0000015544999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025485961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021215926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005267629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04555756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034894669","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550807","title":"Experts within Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Rationality; Enthusiasm; GRASP; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.12972467962030537,"score_gpt":0.3181099485397181,"score_spread":0.1883852689194127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034894669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010431412,0.01825464,0.012407559,0.48703018,0.0057898564,0.000038091977,0.00006426719,0.00010580913,0.46587816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60925287,0.013171863,0.0053547383,0.0951072,0.006367687,0.000111979454,0.00007937368,0.00016794949,0.27038625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917018,0.0049107773,0.00018296526,0.00093292573,0.0012276019,0.0010439329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925202,0.004433016,0.00032875128,0.000409437,0.0009807285,0.001327782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065465025,0.0003885916,0.00037520225,0.0012146437,0.0082749,0.008800741,0.0006224553,0.005708123,0.0116966525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145362355,0.0002433247,0.00029519512,0.0008149729,0.012461971,0.010531546,0.0050718756,0.0075898594,0.0025602242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009410691,0.000008786665,0.00020172492,0.000029018414,0.0000020928715,0.00005759395,0.0030957449,0.00011308245,0.00007324278,0.9321163,0.05744308,0.0068498882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071885643,0.000008454235,0.00014164872,0.00014038618,0.0000021201824,0.00006865099,0.0025932456,0.00020656323,0.00014673056,0.39928058,0.5973964,0.000008062642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033497105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036155803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049536964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006159813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039129257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036307079","doi":"10.1177/0048393103262549","title":"Systems and Mechanisms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08242808562170979,"score_gpt":0.3831817262013647,"score_spread":0.3007536405796549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036307079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009880448,0.060530625,0.20049232,0.06416686,0.0030701458,0.00020847563,0.0006781953,0.0003783288,0.6605946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7649885,0.027867138,0.06642739,0.010700459,0.0046892,0.0008401301,0.0006642738,0.00029709464,0.12352584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979012,0.0011138842,0.0000806428,0.0004135934,0.00035980786,0.00013085899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745077,0.0015165426,0.00014819483,0.0005292484,0.00023621421,0.00011900182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036960563,0.001116955,0.0013952791,0.0019307479,0.0018730966,0.007999395,0.0013824445,0.0037255208,0.01512351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004209911,0.00059804914,0.0008545206,0.0015270915,0.021666676,0.008870995,0.0020948001,0.0050965217,0.002112395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014209945,0.0000021826236,0.000029617186,0.000014821826,0.000003526547,0.0000049364,0.00008270759,0.0001495031,0.00001746491,0.9978278,0.001060966,0.0008051542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050446174,0.000004124123,0.000051792136,0.000026761158,0.0000028697432,0.000011512289,0.000056832054,0.00022095712,0.000022795117,0.97120935,0.02838572,0.0000022302825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027358853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013831062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01512351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041230675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002477371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050593197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040456481","doi":"10.1177/0048393109337474","title":"In Wittgenstein’s Shadow","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Shadow (psychology); Epistemology; SAINT; Analytic philosophy; State (computer science); Art history; Psychoanalysis; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.05530656851848577,"score_gpt":0.36464122490912787,"score_spread":0.3093346563906421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040456481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070339255,0.12185386,0.024413016,0.19990273,0.014461567,0.000031727675,0.00022926884,0.0002850751,0.63178897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40599254,0.064276345,0.014734711,0.0682346,0.02676434,0.00013332232,0.0002878874,0.0009965176,0.41857985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988426,0.00032475125,0.00004134403,0.00026225348,0.0003899424,0.00013904579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00059748726,0.00008412965,0.00008362379,0.000117839394,0.000075409014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015001484,0.0006587674,0.0004660297,0.0022295688,0.002192273,0.004838092,0.0006792662,0.0025410422,0.006285856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052190856,0.0003182513,0.00036314857,0.0014400725,0.010948672,0.008224511,0.001628765,0.005670556,0.0024128042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009846753,0.000008381573,0.000034184246,0.000032871754,0.000002749065,0.00003485568,0.0009047055,0.00004733284,0.00006430817,0.9376044,0.053438485,0.007817926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061817736,0.000008719751,0.000079331454,0.00011722876,0.0000022701774,0.00008122004,0.00033140252,0.00014896653,0.00012258341,0.3550658,0.64402795,0.000008252003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001877848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026610012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006285856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021948863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013279857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02102828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041511474","doi":"10.1177/0048393112454335","title":"One’s a Crowd? On Greenwood’s Delimitation of the Social","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Social ontology; Ontology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2685581418568099,"score_gpt":0.40558601825595936,"score_spread":0.13702787639914948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041511474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06151272,0.010104665,0.028474173,0.33532014,0.0022623718,0.00007073725,0.00010280654,0.00009068276,0.56206167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89787316,0.0037524,0.005470439,0.028107632,0.00093288405,0.00012040206,0.00005375078,0.00013038707,0.06355899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976676,0.0012979256,0.000032274693,0.00038216935,0.00037592373,0.00024408392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.0012290528,0.0000985749,0.00014696906,0.0002631546,0.00026436098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00365282,0.00054224854,0.0005096462,0.0015791006,0.012181962,0.006346053,0.0011452781,0.002702609,0.00532244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038652576,0.00021509948,0.0003919347,0.0011490237,0.03905937,0.011148198,0.00614407,0.004467347,0.0010095753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011411264,0.000008049436,0.00015223843,0.0000137024,0.0000020009818,0.00007260241,0.013892065,0.000086903805,0.000048155554,0.9687743,0.0126756895,0.004262803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008968555,0.000016475384,0.00039045632,0.00016615985,0.000004877807,0.000079831334,0.018799473,0.00052704866,0.00012864928,0.8201385,0.15971598,0.000023430652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011732669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014227127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012181962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034737925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026896591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025204241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044929331","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269196","title":"An Evolutionary Social Science? A Skeptic’s Brief, Theoretical and Substantive","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Conceptualization; Verisimilitude; Skepticism; Philosophy of science; Grammar; Abductive reasoning; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03597539877135871,"score_gpt":0.2703370355074484,"score_spread":0.2343616367360897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044929331","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032725425,0.017922046,0.008030922,0.9340708,0.007752777,0.00001351003,0.00007196439,0.000034081928,0.02883128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42668697,0.05266655,0.019086838,0.3803426,0.053115454,0.00019003284,0.00023667951,0.00015370641,0.06752118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980488,0.00092877256,0.00006365041,0.00034560057,0.00045788064,0.00015542352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970696,0.0016510248,0.0002497529,0.00023173848,0.0005468533,0.00025105843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00434937,0.000515558,0.00055812026,0.0012169802,0.002780256,0.0046478887,0.0019049403,0.005967839,0.006076304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078100115,0.00020236142,0.00042481718,0.001094178,0.016070768,0.00795485,0.0023020708,0.008985522,0.0016173227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253344,0.000021809983,0.00027025092,0.00009390771,0.0000065865306,0.0000758802,0.0011535,0.00015742637,0.00013689497,0.94239676,0.04507583,0.010598732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062383956,0.000018037132,0.00045551287,0.00024568156,0.0000044062035,0.00013809628,0.0013942097,0.00050357846,0.000091922855,0.72088015,0.27625278,0.000009271544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018801151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002017364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006076304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027261195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028908302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02300191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051062416","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100307","title":"Systems and Emergence, Rationality and Imprecision, Free-Wheeling and Evidence, Science and Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ideology; Wheeling; Epistemology; Sociology; Principle of rationality; Positive economics; Political science; Ecological rationality; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.305119869803679,"score_gpt":0.44864458690432174,"score_spread":0.14352471710064274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051062416","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072146885,0.38736567,0.21297196,0.14566825,0.001369589,0.00012559816,0.00056157936,0.00014912435,0.17964143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203634,0.04784882,0.023375696,0.0023313689,0.001145143,0.00015453451,0.0001066482,0.000038823622,0.004635603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934956,0.0041767745,0.00037078976,0.00062841014,0.001099707,0.00022874017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96105623,0.0352142,0.0012363238,0.0012064885,0.0009721422,0.00031475743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011788842,0.00078234135,0.0017582916,0.0036727118,0.0018729236,0.012741655,0.0015013018,0.004114077,0.0034496528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02384243,0.00067621976,0.0006601863,0.00567915,0.045059934,0.013359585,0.0024977159,0.0038392781,0.0002964745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010149841,0.000007939198,0.00021778526,0.000111446614,0.000013735183,0.000014404523,0.00062554824,0.00083858304,0.00003554287,0.99297345,0.000740746,0.004410698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072068337,0.000003412045,0.00017013896,0.00005598401,0.0000049459904,0.000012998678,0.00023461693,0.0004323954,0.000019488314,0.99543,0.003623929,0.0000048483653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063668666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004881756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053060483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003956371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0623461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052872890","doi":"10.1177/0048393112444501","title":"The Freeman-Mead Controversy Revisited","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Sociology; Anthropology; American samoa; Rest (music); Ethnology; Social science","score_opus":0.0595234506591921,"score_gpt":0.34929386136632107,"score_spread":0.28977041070712894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052872890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045861937,0.015533076,0.0030592997,0.56783307,0.0015959082,0.000013864571,0.00005736449,0.000057998303,0.36598754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912738,0.0034966618,0.0010023861,0.038011074,0.0013033731,0.000039165236,0.000022365299,0.00007480354,0.043312192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977695,0.0010302031,0.000040912535,0.00035770788,0.00044045778,0.00036122734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962453,0.0027064434,0.00015454607,0.0002051208,0.0003125524,0.0003760202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038079855,0.00035847357,0.00046469673,0.0011055324,0.013207545,0.006720834,0.00088060077,0.0074639036,0.005798336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00833512,0.00026184658,0.00030663575,0.0011380445,0.037826564,0.0073414887,0.0041612913,0.006224787,0.0005757432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013522092,0.000008824792,0.00023338816,0.000021060474,0.0000018655211,0.000081798134,0.0049095377,0.000058641916,0.00002457874,0.9664382,0.023792462,0.0044160737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038388815,0.00001533614,0.00083747826,0.00022957168,0.000005755738,0.00022539002,0.013713995,0.00031168252,0.0002174867,0.57143724,0.41294605,0.00002152799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026997644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033412334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98679245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008191628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050465083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059434712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053226751","doi":"10.1177/0048393114543987","title":"Book Review: <i>Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences</i> by Muhammad Ali Khalidi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Natural science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10513633589216688,"score_gpt":0.3214449387050039,"score_spread":0.21630860281283704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053226751","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012275027,0.8672349,0.0006246609,0.049663078,0.056050718,0.000027227947,0.00035219794,0.00006426108,0.025860185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002549857,0.7838444,0.00097270304,0.039120503,0.077202834,0.00008710921,0.0005218955,0.00010745254,0.09559324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941134,0.00010567005,0.000039776467,0.000091728,0.00031613358,0.000035415764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746716,0.0011933079,0.00017412913,0.00006970298,0.00089109945,0.00020470988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083377794,0.0008044553,0.0015323821,0.004108973,0.00091559463,0.003670067,0.0012307662,0.0020780545,0.024049245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003750429,0.00039786284,0.00057088106,0.008228293,0.0018549433,0.0035093348,0.0013846022,0.0040237145,0.012997134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004073974,0.000003102338,0.000023742543,0.00036892144,0.0000051992997,0.0000073672554,0.000021423064,0.000029308005,0.0000296771,0.0024247114,0.9704717,0.02661081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031541638,0.000004603944,0.00013809293,0.00046996746,0.0000063777748,0.00007530427,0.000026801343,0.000017903789,0.00002049415,0.0012137821,0.9980184,0.0000052130135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007842342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017578062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024049245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027923232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033502565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08045274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054223592","doi":"10.1177/004931032002003","title":"Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Individualism; Commission; Epistemology; Sociology; Centrality; Conceptual framework; Government (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Law; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06454170758339181,"score_gpt":0.31340657300783453,"score_spread":0.24886486542444272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054223592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09002857,0.012544105,0.13721442,0.22673427,0.0017734288,0.000108592954,0.000091791655,0.00016310954,0.5313417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98393583,0.0014176661,0.005109408,0.0020340795,0.000214915,0.00006911109,0.000019120795,0.000031158062,0.0071686613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798753,0.012828649,0.00084906525,0.001498775,0.0024632683,0.002484849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98125136,0.010036859,0.0028560506,0.002337777,0.002356189,0.0011617831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0163079,0.0003773243,0.00083729223,0.0019754732,0.011546106,0.012057682,0.0020872827,0.0065966398,0.0044426583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03818492,0.00038574115,0.00085635134,0.0022594894,0.028957693,0.017709006,0.010624681,0.0060442756,0.00058200816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069498565,0.0000040099662,0.00014337424,0.000019391642,0.0000064628916,0.000055636385,0.0024871528,0.0003349055,0.000009772887,0.9913777,0.0011427891,0.004411841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009887223,0.0000121390585,0.00013762935,0.00007102168,0.000008340929,0.00011265711,0.0020629033,0.0011257066,0.000062895255,0.96973073,0.026654968,0.000011103948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070226206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003997623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0163079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011341512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008170514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08624548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058027163","doi":"10.1177/0048393105280832","title":"Historical Materialism and Supervenience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Materialism; Historical materialism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Individuation; Sociology; Metaphysics; Law; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07077875656375743,"score_gpt":0.325779412050909,"score_spread":0.25500065548715156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058027163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05422095,0.009453375,0.21413913,0.017429678,0.0012689736,0.000096059804,0.00020381407,0.00022846568,0.7029596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590253,0.003055492,0.015389782,0.0011419826,0.0010073254,0.00009372597,0.00015812737,0.00011203417,0.020016165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968195,0.0016693518,0.00012670699,0.0004815743,0.0006228796,0.0002800222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970009,0.001633725,0.00024375868,0.0005496197,0.00042368306,0.00014833423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004481363,0.0005480873,0.00044109797,0.0027267234,0.0033057672,0.0035926602,0.0012182153,0.001200926,0.00873425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052665323,0.00026671958,0.00062699325,0.0016192987,0.022514913,0.007722289,0.0032314998,0.0030112178,0.0006969028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026438624,0.0000022205772,0.000035497873,0.0000105216695,0.0000011742267,0.000013625523,0.00035708403,0.000050918086,0.000028953875,0.9976689,0.00022881641,0.0015995874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006963731,0.000013960819,0.00014672641,0.000029877956,0.000003610697,0.00006051593,0.00030212582,0.0002777165,0.00018349865,0.9658089,0.033160735,0.0000053486956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001244176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009149872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00873425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037600726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015255249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029218972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061197887","doi":"10.1177/0048393104269203","title":"Book Reviews: Understanding Early Civilizations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15673431410655525,"score_gpt":0.3646054108212802,"score_spread":0.20787109671472492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061197887","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027468364,0.7590432,0.0012557154,0.019387096,0.038159687,0.0000411853,0.000572973,0.00015665479,0.18110879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037839008,0.48860425,0.0013222195,0.014135804,0.039562892,0.00009231958,0.0009072899,0.0001821423,0.4514092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994043,0.00012675348,0.000026747466,0.00008213053,0.0003240819,0.00003590495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803203,0.00088968076,0.00013296581,0.00008507336,0.0006411782,0.0002190008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008094157,0.0016055316,0.0014183882,0.0047420976,0.00092532975,0.004040349,0.0009068154,0.0020600068,0.085958995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030911784,0.00045866583,0.00052420096,0.008610657,0.0014007831,0.0032966232,0.0010456429,0.0024121718,0.037173577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007655829,0.000014605563,0.00005050896,0.000377949,0.0000075311295,0.000011033334,0.00005168663,0.00011866897,0.000059657417,0.006495984,0.9550328,0.037771896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044560556,0.000006055157,0.00018292115,0.00038008782,0.000006788669,0.00002473459,0.000043584743,0.00002079503,0.00001891063,0.004366175,0.9949418,0.0000038317703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005339603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015353075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085958995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020575528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002338036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28756148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062346776","doi":"10.1177/0048393112451739","title":"Honesty Still Is the Best Policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Advice (programming); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06514659820678258,"score_gpt":0.3606297717950579,"score_spread":0.2954831735882753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062346776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003352068,0.00523206,0.014734397,0.65943855,0.0064860675,0.000054943353,0.00016672109,0.00018385274,0.31035137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46849912,0.005771332,0.012490907,0.31961393,0.0089198025,0.00028052687,0.00028657692,0.0006020528,0.18353574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686854,0.011773236,0.0012817412,0.0051362994,0.008885152,0.0042380723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692963,0.014180454,0.0021639452,0.0065463283,0.0052783163,0.0025347213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024731917,0.00075562554,0.0013522807,0.0011142386,0.008312334,0.016825821,0.0020639228,0.01643119,0.021128349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06480592,0.00056889735,0.0010665298,0.0007223451,0.022481,0.02043986,0.006279714,0.018035723,0.0066952445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026548845,0.000024146248,0.00019279684,0.0000575503,0.00002570166,0.000059630685,0.0007765683,0.00018338753,0.00007803943,0.92339694,0.06530157,0.009877084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002170758,0.000022406803,0.00023022771,0.00035044466,0.000018220007,0.00007979937,0.00088246504,0.00027140416,0.00027330438,0.6990161,0.298804,0.00002989972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004439637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038086113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024731917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006061221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012521533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065460455","doi":"10.1177/0048393110386670","title":"We Socratic Philosophers Know that We Know Nothing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Socratic method; Philosophy; Epistemology; Need to know; Computer science","score_opus":0.1313058193916601,"score_gpt":0.3019493335893317,"score_spread":0.17064351419767157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065460455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034040888,0.01701258,0.020000791,0.13202462,0.0095350575,0.000028466595,0.00010474697,0.0002856015,0.8176039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3679112,0.04531508,0.014116001,0.09505975,0.021459263,0.00015835019,0.00026518665,0.00095136056,0.45476392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974661,0.0008186805,0.000091784714,0.000229456,0.0011662487,0.00022773592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380964,0.003220055,0.00045847852,0.000772819,0.0013243617,0.0004146087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021934113,0.00067059114,0.0007138991,0.0012644123,0.0055918656,0.008010543,0.0008002658,0.0021539212,0.021278849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008059246,0.00041604647,0.00057992555,0.0013491311,0.020628322,0.011247679,0.002266291,0.009175876,0.009833221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009795837,0.0000096882695,0.00009404134,0.000080817284,0.000006349198,0.000012566629,0.0024190645,0.000071105096,0.000081117265,0.8963704,0.08980114,0.011043916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003536522,0.000009833374,0.00017325878,0.0001351315,0.00000778174,0.000046962723,0.0017781412,0.00018104266,0.00017758092,0.39348322,0.6039901,0.0000134292895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019113645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030555062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021278849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003896212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07118487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065619419","doi":"10.1177/0048393108315532","title":"Review Essay: Boudon's European Diagnosis of and Prophylactic against Relativism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Evolutionism; Cultural relativism; Epistemology; Deconstruction (building); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Moral relativism; Sociology; Social science; Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.16436530620133313,"score_gpt":0.3656941021350252,"score_spread":0.20132879593369205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065619419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043660888,0.6483637,0.00080896536,0.25718018,0.068224326,0.0000061384976,0.000038255675,0.000013297677,0.024928492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035971332,0.61138004,0.0009109382,0.14742464,0.16644847,0.000039537666,0.00010376028,0.00010966211,0.037611663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979882,0.0008856685,0.00009501613,0.00040815977,0.0004701846,0.00015275166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486524,0.0036506874,0.00025512814,0.00015023918,0.00086862553,0.0002101158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037231727,0.0008255686,0.0013115236,0.0033235142,0.0020036784,0.006342662,0.0016988371,0.008246625,0.008075089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146002,0.00030762248,0.0006958343,0.004236889,0.009967027,0.0089885965,0.002020173,0.006553835,0.0022944862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030755535,0.000017445971,0.00015270297,0.0007256282,0.000026120459,0.00009583943,0.0006119756,0.00016646467,0.000065493645,0.19677801,0.7458093,0.055520315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007923391,0.0000075214593,0.00033095956,0.0016283619,0.000010234775,0.00021017356,0.0003975694,0.00004526185,0.000035642395,0.045590334,0.95172393,0.000012175164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045046792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037273848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008246625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047450014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003433565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034427583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067295203","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100401","title":"Between Social Science and Social Technology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Sociology; Social philosophy; Epistemology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social change; Social science; Social technology; Context (archaeology); Social epistemology; Social science education; Social relation; Political science; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.09912128412610711,"score_gpt":0.3912407030522486,"score_spread":0.2921194189261415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067295203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023826335,0.06337832,0.1065496,0.24302495,0.0018429596,0.000107858854,0.00008056813,0.00014480938,0.56104463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060994,0.021972097,0.024188317,0.01882223,0.003071139,0.00040208464,0.00007886024,0.00012573691,0.025240183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880862,0.008360791,0.00020651637,0.0010295945,0.0016408678,0.0006759733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98667705,0.010886526,0.0004931049,0.00093415484,0.0005130862,0.0004961247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109163225,0.00086748076,0.0010262898,0.004151151,0.005991747,0.012452409,0.00095543097,0.0042680944,0.00681246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008439551,0.00037919907,0.0007630283,0.003859708,0.067662306,0.01439538,0.009956582,0.006490972,0.00076192786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022186632,0.0000063431967,0.000065922235,0.0000245301,0.0000039984566,0.00002101964,0.001374583,0.00013520227,0.0000142889985,0.99508977,0.0006349128,0.0026272445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003648799,0.0000075964726,0.000081081525,0.000064292515,0.0000017731107,0.000029676195,0.00090433913,0.00015824114,0.000022978948,0.96967703,0.029045725,0.000003582814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030674473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022982387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012452409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008220358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007363341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05964315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074319057","doi":"10.1177/0048393106293377","title":"Rescuing the <i>Gorgias</i> from Latour","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Key (lock); Politics; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05277579070202116,"score_gpt":0.328475330002744,"score_spread":0.27569953930072283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074319057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019454109,0.011336491,0.019867351,0.7028551,0.007845118,0.00003314098,0.00007075101,0.00020808348,0.2383299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7662211,0.0045261784,0.008076707,0.14417173,0.0050331987,0.00015348925,0.000064860484,0.00063364214,0.07111902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027646,0.006247596,0.00023782784,0.0008788263,0.0013595648,0.0009996783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927429,0.0044838367,0.0004763493,0.0008317834,0.0010259578,0.00043926082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009081484,0.00074996334,0.00096179324,0.0013718114,0.011371295,0.010644464,0.0013646875,0.008342707,0.0038730723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023490725,0.00043728107,0.00061988627,0.001170409,0.039323106,0.012201033,0.008782582,0.017811345,0.0015506446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029030776,0.000008217013,0.00011566156,0.000029709418,0.000004281288,0.00011095465,0.005851959,0.00008500456,0.00009626659,0.9619595,0.028026601,0.0036827803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014063867,0.000012741465,0.000121723024,0.00014335461,0.000005400028,0.00009599294,0.0027614767,0.00037291867,0.0002805757,0.66038513,0.33577815,0.000028512553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065124924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008182266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068178824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054055694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049467385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078839159","doi":"10.1177/0048393107303776","title":"Defending Scientific Study of the Social","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Criticism; Relativism; Epistemology; Sociology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.22716297335120786,"score_gpt":0.42963739057573025,"score_spread":0.2024744172245224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078839159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012940215,0.041910425,0.074958764,0.75328964,0.0073946114,0.000070189526,0.00008423121,0.0001499224,0.10920194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7810011,0.040342882,0.041807838,0.094597496,0.025204943,0.00075074506,0.00015115528,0.00020630569,0.015937457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97067297,0.015887342,0.0010125978,0.0039363853,0.0078006396,0.00069006986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93375695,0.049010303,0.0034429347,0.006593227,0.0058520394,0.0013446674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04312156,0.0010179597,0.0019277077,0.0064227665,0.008084896,0.011992866,0.005750279,0.013588732,0.0029022016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044224583,0.00050512806,0.0013433396,0.0030005448,0.119242355,0.018342366,0.010909781,0.01659545,0.0011326445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004267899,0.000018578234,0.000117513504,0.00006196993,0.0000069174293,0.00001726165,0.0015291151,0.00020727051,0.000040083087,0.992492,0.0023792693,0.0031257642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073402357,0.000006413022,0.000080652295,0.00014639145,0.0000045889537,0.000020491107,0.00082517,0.00031321627,0.000067517576,0.9664552,0.032066666,0.0000062872023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004054234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022617455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074692885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011687837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22805136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079813789","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352876","title":"Book Review: Steven D. Hales Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. A Bradford Book. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. Cloth. 216 pp","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04770823042147856,"score_gpt":0.28454254452051386,"score_spread":0.2368343140990353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079813789","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000065760076,0.9545907,0.0004584836,0.016247474,0.012668015,0.000020904996,0.0002959436,0.00007171254,0.015581019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001365546,0.88943213,0.00064202683,0.008884727,0.010995443,0.000050514052,0.00052434066,0.000088605986,0.08801671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999401,0.0000811399,0.000046595123,0.000094488445,0.0003413131,0.000035532248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779046,0.00085879816,0.00015790894,0.00006315951,0.0009468423,0.0001828188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009468749,0.001750056,0.002322032,0.004390385,0.00080591114,0.0027732754,0.0018059649,0.0021779092,0.045744427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003980525,0.00089520396,0.000748418,0.0064661545,0.0012232601,0.0039191754,0.0010568318,0.004524175,0.04764868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008641327,0.0000050502667,0.000020975,0.0005363202,0.000009283496,0.00001630495,0.00002115528,0.000038778304,0.00003172396,0.0009858401,0.9561418,0.042183973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007870683,0.000005940831,0.00013498927,0.00074153073,0.000012303995,0.0001787811,0.000024057843,0.000018540442,0.000032637607,0.0011369643,0.99769896,0.000007500588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075000357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013426449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045744427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002174842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004187685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15303034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081282198","doi":"10.1177/0048393108323883","title":"Book Review: Bunge, Mario. 2006. Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07672702572118759,"score_gpt":0.3687742981605271,"score_spread":0.2920472724393395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081282198","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049999664,0.9610165,0.00023798678,0.016534049,0.010674818,0.00002131704,0.00051473774,0.00004648811,0.010904066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010976434,0.92813104,0.0003982641,0.00993664,0.007579682,0.000051561103,0.00076097104,0.00006466582,0.05197945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935275,0.00008137986,0.000052649677,0.00010366896,0.00034569768,0.00006381824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962721,0.0014463986,0.00023362307,0.00008162225,0.0017017403,0.00026453883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011228696,0.0019172226,0.003029531,0.007054324,0.0010388131,0.0031907659,0.0028302532,0.003218356,0.061194982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004616316,0.0009784027,0.00082961534,0.012839665,0.0015361396,0.0034974574,0.0015260566,0.004731054,0.046727132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010819922,0.0000038371386,0.000029300816,0.001130573,0.00000965287,0.000022900751,0.000033420674,0.000032770262,0.000028134791,0.0007403283,0.9592017,0.038756706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008932073,0.0000038065098,0.00021958529,0.0015062235,0.000014811317,0.00014015981,0.000035481196,0.000012520239,0.000024970404,0.0006501482,0.99737525,0.000008116767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025622146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06489834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061194982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042120386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059583713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20471764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081301242","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352772","title":"Science as Commodities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Economics; Social science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.10906597542454707,"score_gpt":0.3157061078839911,"score_spread":0.20664013245944404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081301242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003711817,0.028442701,0.016788138,0.023419097,0.0023449196,0.00006387021,0.00027491795,0.00010951531,0.92484504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36329493,0.07161774,0.019751577,0.008266895,0.0037186358,0.0002982011,0.0005016442,0.00029898292,0.5322514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.0002831116,0.000027861779,0.0001004768,0.0002689391,0.000084247535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.0003527534,0.000059164355,0.00011857798,0.00011628314,0.00006613102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007457756,0.0006328974,0.0005945683,0.0015159956,0.0018137358,0.007542685,0.00089597754,0.0016520064,0.02010644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021726256,0.00034651134,0.00047913505,0.0025361858,0.0067507676,0.009438282,0.0021679755,0.003103939,0.0042377785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001774454,0.0000025257602,0.000021131924,0.000018555347,0.0000012316358,0.00000987419,0.00006573933,0.0001816153,0.000026333311,0.9919294,0.0054338053,0.0023079778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023391528,0.000006085764,0.000053095384,0.0000657077,0.000001810138,0.000036929367,0.00012487314,0.00024742621,0.000043883116,0.6952168,0.3041983,0.0000027501176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002115917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001749314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047936677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022815035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06726271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084576870","doi":"10.1177/004839310103100301","title":"A Disturbance of Psychoanalytic Memory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalytic theory; Misrepresentation; Representation (politics); Psychoanalysis; Disturbance (geology); Psychology; Meaning (existential); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07671639654811681,"score_gpt":0.39926922329093023,"score_spread":0.32255282674281344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084576870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17091604,0.061589316,0.15427326,0.19752537,0.007383306,0.00009342688,0.00012314497,0.000830837,0.4072654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638285,0.0062856125,0.007831304,0.005567961,0.0018135463,0.000049129983,0.000023998495,0.00019288067,0.014407098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939976,0.0027950325,0.00025045683,0.0005714073,0.0019077507,0.00047771152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930733,0.003288017,0.0008735935,0.0016287578,0.0007809762,0.00035538682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004929513,0.00030576432,0.00038537063,0.0014892841,0.0033161903,0.006751283,0.0012328617,0.001859407,0.0021177158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0200351,0.0002832834,0.00026608843,0.0010211768,0.026368178,0.0088717155,0.0059718606,0.00506609,0.0004713754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007314105,0.000017894916,0.00068699894,0.00009244078,0.00001157924,0.0002192695,0.039053377,0.00017650484,0.0006288186,0.8890437,0.0068214955,0.063174814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031435822,0.00009632554,0.0010260848,0.00038730336,0.000018320605,0.0015403299,0.014383043,0.0006344016,0.0023255637,0.6921917,0.28732336,0.000042052747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013992464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010028018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006751283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032577266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026768874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026070058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085850893","doi":"10.1177/0048393105280869","title":"Back to the Drawing Board","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Nominalism; Idealism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Hacker; Presentation (obstetrics); Philosophy; Metaphysics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08825386071034368,"score_gpt":0.29491097736333677,"score_spread":0.20665711665299308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085850893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010763451,0.004202,0.005270298,0.056535073,0.018234234,0.0000574193,0.000549598,0.00050642283,0.9135686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012516567,0.0015003802,0.0012265199,0.010120181,0.0020210107,0.000038505324,0.00025914848,0.0005541444,0.97176355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992385,0.0001950733,0.00003091587,0.0002021792,0.0002118246,0.00012147532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884605,0.00024345385,0.000035991794,0.0001773152,0.0004920915,0.00020502316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081995904,0.00068858673,0.00039734642,0.0010646826,0.005626441,0.009900956,0.0010504489,0.0027981142,0.3601208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055400515,0.00036328327,0.0004693918,0.0011414754,0.002766884,0.00737172,0.0037296996,0.0063626114,0.15715401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023911412,0.000010673193,0.00008254714,0.000033572156,0.0000024537367,0.000060336828,0.0006719329,0.000054332595,0.00009752103,0.15358901,0.804962,0.040411767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015667781,0.0000019181339,0.00003268205,0.00003069518,6.1311863e-7,0.000017053739,0.00027719722,0.000020527956,0.000026537167,0.00787788,0.99171114,0.0000022094735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077315387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012260403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3601208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031539865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018317673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088470243","doi":"10.1177/0048393108315688","title":"Book Review: Stadler, F., and Fischer, K. R., editors. (2006). Paul Feyerabend: ein Philosoph aus Wien. Vienna: Springer","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychoanalysis and Social Critique","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.046289979392256146,"score_gpt":0.32926063736733185,"score_spread":0.2829706579750757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088470243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006213627,0.97465706,0.0002464917,0.0075572906,0.0111538945,0.000026754415,0.00054000167,0.000048856084,0.005707603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00071134313,0.9704424,0.0004874827,0.0033465158,0.0055540255,0.000046237925,0.0007298899,0.000046076682,0.018635947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.00011279741,0.00011248502,0.00011919451,0.0005247761,0.00007449874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948679,0.001971051,0.0004824528,0.00012764429,0.0021949194,0.0003560732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016256983,0.0021590248,0.0035115585,0.008477873,0.00079206575,0.0035181388,0.0028153372,0.0023679356,0.039740264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058544436,0.0010538062,0.00094434194,0.012370163,0.0010978924,0.0037296254,0.0014306001,0.0038117515,0.049818587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002428093,0.0000073271626,0.000051175135,0.002440157,0.000027686328,0.00002777103,0.000034638884,0.00006012012,0.000063470026,0.0006355134,0.90255064,0.09407712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014032392,0.000009726816,0.00026668512,0.0022259152,0.000037883885,0.0002552152,0.0000310681,0.000021449125,0.000047373145,0.0005910597,0.99648786,0.00001162388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010534044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022854859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039740264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026865273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005776318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1329444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094546540","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370140","title":"The Manhattan Project and Its Long Shadow","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Manhattan project; Ideology; Shadow (psychology); Reading (process); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy of science; History of science; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Politics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2115103338962021,"score_gpt":0.2923278322267995,"score_spread":0.08081749833059737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094546540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009518089,0.055581827,0.01440762,0.11808752,0.0055627218,0.0000109298935,0.00016309359,0.00014700678,0.79652125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.704138,0.048810616,0.008836716,0.014425825,0.008771682,0.000070382695,0.00017855226,0.00047191014,0.21429625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986588,0.00080862653,0.000019062114,0.00015638201,0.00022904934,0.00012810648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686545,0.0018220827,0.0001412371,0.00043877217,0.00043893687,0.00029333943],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016992294,0.00043256363,0.0004894739,0.0012193774,0.0064361626,0.0063272337,0.0007994792,0.0019657603,0.010951166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034828302,0.00034942527,0.0002453033,0.002564798,0.013402701,0.0066043683,0.0023057875,0.0048820176,0.0027945666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003967641,0.000002415362,0.000022858148,0.000012524765,0.0000016556445,0.000010157316,0.00023393844,0.000062139334,0.000005700885,0.98725986,0.009610122,0.0027746682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046749824,0.000004078187,0.00009170782,0.00005380808,0.0000016807849,0.000028697556,0.0002372381,0.00018408074,0.000029894143,0.7995323,0.1998273,0.0000045909783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009742634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103100715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99356383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005015607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003937997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03663528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105562243","doi":"10.1177/0048393108323893","title":"Review Essay: Apprehending the “Social”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Subject (documents); Social thought; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.2729413813568088,"score_gpt":0.42160726872969573,"score_spread":0.14866588737288694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105562243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016172939,0.7498521,0.00024272694,0.1288057,0.11199443,0.0000126441255,0.000056941695,0.000014191099,0.00885956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005576217,0.7188125,0.00033799815,0.100961335,0.15867166,0.00007292448,0.0001056355,0.00003411294,0.015427656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981658,0.0006410208,0.00013535867,0.0002586752,0.0006899985,0.000109078814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946238,0.0030068292,0.00037146296,0.00017646399,0.0015169895,0.00030447674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032629878,0.0009726625,0.001344576,0.003039154,0.0011530953,0.0043841866,0.0016052556,0.00499172,0.008484938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012425897,0.0003607934,0.00081661786,0.003704174,0.0039119185,0.0046729273,0.0017736963,0.0048131226,0.0075834068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014029449,0.0000067241913,0.000052379022,0.0015664928,0.000025198568,0.00012178057,0.000162068,0.000039482333,0.00011706476,0.0057856007,0.94467485,0.04743429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006253777,0.000011397423,0.00023501794,0.002092332,0.000018177821,0.0003612231,0.00021054983,0.000018543118,0.00004272972,0.0034196558,0.9935774,0.0000067574715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001708322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003010452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008484938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024322835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004658969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028384924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110235649","doi":"10.1177/0048393114550806","title":"Noble Savages, Ignoble Colleagues","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Anthropology; Anthropology of art; Applied anthropology; Sociology; Digital anthropology; Medical anthropology; Sociocultural anthropology; Four field approach; History; Art history","score_opus":0.08970826883070368,"score_gpt":0.37192776986197884,"score_spread":0.28221950103127513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110235649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024232534,0.017860498,0.001962155,0.7605643,0.17866649,0.000028339715,0.000061643375,0.00013445698,0.03829885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053512424,0.013239675,0.001998566,0.53791994,0.05296249,0.000094531846,0.000095743984,0.000170799,0.34000576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815935,0.00053032587,0.00007130175,0.00036185127,0.00065768836,0.00021958465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410397,0.0014357211,0.000274868,0.00018749875,0.0024047175,0.0015932797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017776239,0.0005344226,0.00034386254,0.00087056396,0.004612741,0.0053835465,0.0010503328,0.0044486583,0.0058062244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011660541,0.00023195852,0.00032408405,0.00052974705,0.0029374827,0.003085685,0.001393146,0.00939176,0.0030817064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012140405,0.000012529033,0.0003225538,0.000056450615,0.0000032830135,0.0002018032,0.0021229067,0.00002253031,0.00012605576,0.011907689,0.97856027,0.006651807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012253478,0.000004365616,0.00017376934,0.000070277354,0.0000014780093,0.0002169293,0.0016900329,0.000019314093,0.000094069204,0.0016225183,0.99609935,0.0000066252164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062326053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022358278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99538726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020901263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025874784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019423783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112385944","doi":"10.1177/0048393115583944","title":"On Post-Philosophical Sociology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Sociology and Norbert Elias","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Vision; Social science; Sociology of knowledge; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.15338709587680774,"score_gpt":0.40080467659661717,"score_spread":0.24741758071980943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112385944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00980347,0.026019752,0.009340608,0.388314,0.00639472,0.000033141943,0.00005946459,0.00007459271,0.55996025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6987172,0.017616782,0.0042044483,0.09793215,0.011073586,0.00018164107,0.000101317964,0.00024505614,0.16992779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954176,0.0028282586,0.00009712983,0.00053971156,0.00070513703,0.00041220183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459696,0.0030432295,0.00034517224,0.00075124553,0.00084839965,0.00041491655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069738603,0.0005507045,0.0004997777,0.00179812,0.006361632,0.0072403727,0.001027873,0.004468191,0.012155423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009086647,0.0002051461,0.00042260357,0.0009997969,0.04734863,0.010036532,0.0065058535,0.008808923,0.0018343724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018222783,0.000004365998,0.00004617867,0.000012291062,8.6540507e-7,0.000012003616,0.0016434035,0.000018954292,0.00001481025,0.9896528,0.0068373713,0.0017550947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054894217,0.000011219392,0.00020743707,0.00017019776,0.0000014341384,0.000044598153,0.0025624298,0.000096856995,0.00005855656,0.5700374,0.42679963,0.000004716367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034595549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039103655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012155423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009359298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043957494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0679068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138179333","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352868","title":"From Popper’s Literary Remains","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Karl popper; Open society; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Critical rationalism; History; Art; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07531311394992102,"score_gpt":0.2781533643672711,"score_spread":0.2028402504173501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138179333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077705295,0.0066459947,0.003207554,0.021128556,0.0023044823,0.00004175547,0.00032681375,0.00008356404,0.95849067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22911026,0.013766092,0.0036654866,0.007994866,0.004289501,0.00013364897,0.0008318968,0.00063263206,0.73957574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992924,0.00016498104,0.0000360576,0.00009895847,0.00033733412,0.00007019013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876153,0.00056594395,0.00007363828,0.00016720618,0.00032774804,0.000103965336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006806834,0.00055554137,0.00026452143,0.002425579,0.00610838,0.0067026727,0.0005794813,0.0011812296,0.021253848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004628971,0.00037930536,0.00019004203,0.0021746545,0.007092814,0.00675546,0.00430202,0.0039058416,0.0063840393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003193058,0.000014997623,0.00019447117,0.00022380122,0.0000055812466,0.0004022023,0.02305995,0.00009916337,0.00034101767,0.7162894,0.20368938,0.05564804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019121978,0.0000057202074,0.00016107006,0.00014591447,0.0000023601235,0.00013329156,0.0030888754,0.000029509298,0.00019567512,0.029506685,0.9667243,0.0000046710084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024893912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047935606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022580277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001844991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144496163","doi":"10.1177/0048393109352859","title":"“The Superorganic,” or Kroeber’s Hidden Agenda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Transcendental number; Evolutionism; Creed; Trilogy; Essentialism; Statement (logic); Immutability; Cultural system; Globalization; Philosophy; Anthropology; Social science; History; Political science","score_opus":0.105086051465614,"score_gpt":0.37930251035822354,"score_spread":0.27421645889260954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144496163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034218844,0.016401589,0.047108576,0.20203984,0.002895178,0.000039305083,0.00012222561,0.00011584798,0.6970586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8918908,0.00527009,0.008517382,0.024391849,0.0014144691,0.00008724456,0.00007951651,0.00018290862,0.06816565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785346,0.0010375908,0.00005753659,0.00043093658,0.00037190615,0.0002486127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839765,0.0008399203,0.00012986634,0.00032439738,0.00018090542,0.00012723189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002603891,0.00053662976,0.0003313952,0.0010885803,0.0033703696,0.0051854313,0.0009370208,0.0032898383,0.0053088428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053832475,0.00023776152,0.00027184963,0.0007430108,0.025488257,0.012339656,0.0038099703,0.004825896,0.0009227071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008905434,0.0000044720528,0.00008508601,0.000018357425,0.0000015283703,0.000018732602,0.0021791586,0.000034375167,0.00006861445,0.989325,0.0044148294,0.0038409762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008439298,0.000012809853,0.00027820564,0.0001561335,0.0000038318085,0.00008222739,0.0026671242,0.0001826136,0.00029481377,0.73684555,0.25945795,0.0000102528575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022079716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034669952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053088428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037172928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024025994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026970923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153606095","doi":"10.1177/0048393115571251","title":"Einstein’s Philosophy Politely Shelved","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Einstein; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Theoretical physics; Mathematical physics","score_opus":0.08914872411777935,"score_gpt":0.327620300537809,"score_spread":0.23847157642002964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153606095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019090036,0.0174058,0.10678404,0.31389594,0.010683041,0.00011671073,0.00067008,0.0005961805,0.5307582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6659771,0.010556302,0.043431867,0.104244135,0.011163423,0.00031947024,0.00036260154,0.0005951983,0.16334987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674845,0.0011268423,0.00020735618,0.00070726156,0.0009724944,0.00023769515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979913,0.0009016146,0.0001650827,0.00030672908,0.00054842007,0.00008674013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031071824,0.0009042762,0.0008855783,0.0014967389,0.0029706256,0.0040197987,0.00076568034,0.005824779,0.005782584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008136677,0.0003878394,0.0006303726,0.0007218953,0.015247325,0.00603668,0.0025940754,0.0066716326,0.0025647236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012096493,0.0000060033794,0.00008363018,0.000028675342,0.0000056618182,0.00001236945,0.0002754657,0.00011240478,0.000098892815,0.9843338,0.00955988,0.0054710866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017640803,0.000023918406,0.00018814774,0.00006115881,0.000007303173,0.000053423588,0.000104447005,0.0003426015,0.00031652086,0.7983281,0.20053434,0.000022482403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038859458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003423376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005824779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031319777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025702335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022724152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168133519","doi":"10.1177/0048393106296572","title":"Unwrinkling the Carpet of Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of language; Extension (predicate logic); Natural (archaeology); Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.16461753626215953,"score_gpt":0.3356673704731893,"score_spread":0.17104983421102976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168133519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008450339,0.1666952,0.031961452,0.498191,0.014628095,0.00003642507,0.00011229754,0.00011566263,0.27980942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65419775,0.095552206,0.014452696,0.11335371,0.033599455,0.00022773696,0.00016637234,0.00063508283,0.0878149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931924,0.0037487024,0.00018391377,0.00083518395,0.0017078364,0.00033198314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923878,0.0052735624,0.00027358558,0.00081440556,0.0010359908,0.0002146419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056540426,0.0006254474,0.00063790125,0.0024941391,0.0042720484,0.0075775823,0.0012882556,0.004485829,0.0054885666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013756702,0.00031671338,0.00054419175,0.0014846043,0.044009663,0.019917158,0.0038230522,0.00887102,0.0014310129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009491288,0.0000025936852,0.0000405716,0.00006563288,0.000003928127,0.00003682703,0.002052554,0.00008253661,0.00003374917,0.97290593,0.017176116,0.0075901463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044181565,0.000008589416,0.00012240905,0.0002587482,0.0000034358436,0.000077221346,0.0014748778,0.00011473184,0.00006366622,0.7451071,0.25275442,0.000010303733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040212367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034036476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99572796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041489853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037448227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030103147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172157222","doi":"10.1177/0048393111400705","title":"On the Reliability of Science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Criticism; Rationalism; Karl popper; Inference; Principal (computer security); Falsifiability; Reliability (semiconductor); Rigour; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Socratic method; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Power (physics); Law","score_opus":0.16740760774538962,"score_gpt":0.27485772450675544,"score_spread":0.10745011676136582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172157222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015507478,0.12951997,0.18378107,0.35305616,0.012629853,0.00015343445,0.00041323685,0.00032616698,0.30461264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80800277,0.052182272,0.042035934,0.040699195,0.023165815,0.00035480378,0.00023524075,0.000448173,0.03287583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9589691,0.025470512,0.0012189429,0.0031789567,0.009870115,0.0012923507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76308995,0.2127994,0.0057207947,0.008539817,0.009085306,0.0007648245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039650623,0.0010653909,0.0016718085,0.006190279,0.0035570932,0.009168765,0.0024473974,0.0047584525,0.0050587645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1569344,0.0008174548,0.0015130016,0.003270064,0.049659207,0.017823203,0.0051945425,0.009014394,0.00120541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024341489,0.0000077493505,0.00049279863,0.00012954949,0.000041645028,0.00005210983,0.001342459,0.0010612608,0.000041617193,0.96831393,0.012132271,0.016360417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009185498,0.000013566227,0.00030763075,0.00024336898,0.000011731357,0.00005207921,0.00022981514,0.0010874541,0.00007296155,0.96682245,0.031133492,0.000016186925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052188975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002810923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072405403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049856487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20969504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253989905","doi":"10.1177/0048393115613570","title":"On the Hidden Thought Experiments of Economic Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Positive economics; Formal description; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24039315092660887,"score_gpt":0.3515014101262487,"score_spread":0.11110825919963982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253989905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06275772,0.024000684,0.41207814,0.19469742,0.0040426003,0.00048150422,0.0005760059,0.00058395567,0.30078194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147134,0.00579438,0.05959988,0.009630811,0.0020676728,0.00086140307,0.00011906898,0.00021369333,0.0069996384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95898694,0.03211655,0.00096143683,0.0027011596,0.004226058,0.0010078645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77341104,0.20301913,0.0054795314,0.013121793,0.003657612,0.0013110166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045418363,0.0011942374,0.0018285286,0.0027746959,0.0035076847,0.008764676,0.00294994,0.0062836586,0.009496593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10197347,0.00080893375,0.0015718567,0.0018430497,0.058170296,0.026765704,0.006204687,0.010803992,0.000934248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022033119,0.000013866725,0.00006474874,0.000046792924,0.000009594533,0.000015889516,0.00023927688,0.0005656933,0.000027042206,0.9967604,0.00055948517,0.0016750727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019174699,0.000006076468,0.000028301201,0.000031739157,0.0000032749867,0.000005001942,0.00003523492,0.0005417934,0.000029383724,0.99783605,0.0014598739,0.000004142503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013237421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058476883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055217813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035791371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24019814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327498129","doi":"10.1177/0048393110370142","title":"Book Review: Tristram Hunt Marx’s General: The Revolutionary Life of Friedrich Engels, New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2009. 430 pp. $32.00 (hardback)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.05064452777446349,"score_gpt":0.3240260258995164,"score_spread":0.2733814981250529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327498129","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058262747,0.9600374,0.00020408223,0.015145616,0.012653966,0.000010835589,0.0001629522,0.000046615045,0.011680227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013224347,0.8883638,0.0003184418,0.007645658,0.014500394,0.000035689496,0.00028796543,0.0000686126,0.087457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950814,0.00008080888,0.00003656531,0.00008263626,0.00024663008,0.00004513814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860317,0.0006621666,0.00012527342,0.00004165958,0.00042047387,0.00014731959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009897216,0.001838583,0.00190171,0.004344648,0.0008726407,0.003115811,0.0016387587,0.0021123104,0.047318082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033234372,0.0007356377,0.00056311046,0.0055463654,0.0013141568,0.004303583,0.0011930588,0.0036108335,0.041811783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008887294,0.0000042865418,0.00001566305,0.0004063213,0.000005204013,0.0000132953655,0.000025159623,0.000032360145,0.0000226784,0.0008827493,0.9626055,0.035978064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006771906,0.000005687548,0.00015070604,0.0009589024,0.000007722675,0.000134604,0.00003854803,0.000014180514,0.00002810705,0.001154763,0.9974923,0.000007865069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065309345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01323757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047318082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023923884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037137237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15829474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329680548","doi":"10.1177/0048393115578807","title":"Book Review: <i>The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology?</i> by Roger E. Backhouse","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07997691493313532,"score_gpt":0.2804342540611901,"score_spread":0.2004573391280548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329680548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015822615,0.6157119,0.00054958975,0.2075349,0.13702102,0.00003343282,0.00047894832,0.000103240236,0.038408775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031476156,0.5101145,0.0006626402,0.093065605,0.17959276,0.000095031086,0.0006737701,0.00023784488,0.2124103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989517,0.0001654265,0.000052689964,0.00015914344,0.00060449133,0.00006663043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923888,0.003683054,0.00047262738,0.00019150256,0.002596121,0.000667926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013221488,0.0009876201,0.0017378449,0.0026404695,0.0010039174,0.0048785717,0.0015373204,0.0034681484,0.036193896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629586,0.00052141753,0.0006005693,0.0048200777,0.0015936528,0.0041813343,0.0012612243,0.0062904623,0.032698717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026749603,0.0000016909502,0.000012252311,0.000103423394,0.0000024744504,0.000003971125,0.000005404429,0.000018565355,0.000009578442,0.00090755697,0.9903182,0.008614172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007257897,0.000005183504,0.00013920247,0.00043326613,0.000005553361,0.00005269274,0.000013584726,0.00002958632,0.000018922896,0.0024421115,0.9968459,0.000006768783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004174546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036193896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028598963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004116336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1210807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466757689","doi":"10.1177/0048393116654860","title":"Mead and the Trajectory of Anthropology in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Aside; Government (linguistics); Anthropology; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Energy (signal processing); History; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08654197018307805,"score_gpt":0.38018280827436784,"score_spread":0.2936408380912898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466757689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25065246,0.040387996,0.00079499854,0.42272204,0.0010548586,0.000030535484,0.000056052533,0.000027420556,0.28427368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93133426,0.007334331,0.0014916267,0.02021941,0.00019506479,0.000052630963,0.000021760312,0.000022612003,0.039328214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697113,0.0021681562,0.00006304714,0.0001637853,0.00021692688,0.0004170153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979551,0.0009358964,0.00016984918,0.00008896673,0.00021312719,0.0006369578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036007825,0.00019311113,0.000190287,0.001401407,0.022488462,0.006586211,0.00046003787,0.0030700106,0.0052084266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030350995,0.00023544945,0.00014025364,0.0011035727,0.016204279,0.0038580014,0.008686749,0.0038436977,0.00026821726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008604683,0.00018621901,0.009144045,0.000119216194,0.000015894431,0.0011010686,0.24870154,0.00025688348,0.0006550341,0.62730396,0.050218266,0.06221195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008641876,0.00006421341,0.009050674,0.000695142,0.000004370736,0.00035349355,0.16808368,0.0001892712,0.0002511157,0.06407091,0.7571864,0.00004210359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06524157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25286016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06524157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105422195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076151974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12972367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467929664","doi":"10.1177/0048393116657537","title":"Max Planck’s Remorse","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Planck; Physics; Psychology; Astrophysics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05356192502584946,"score_gpt":0.30938459455548056,"score_spread":0.2558226695296311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467929664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030660324,0.106729366,0.012996614,0.2007852,0.10253772,0.00010245119,0.0073673846,0.0020098425,0.5644054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11558144,0.10599871,0.01902185,0.023060134,0.046343993,0.00038230614,0.004900799,0.0029133915,0.68179744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843353,0.00028035796,0.00007307997,0.00049619126,0.0005048147,0.00021206411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873203,0.00020927862,0.00008337303,0.0003132474,0.0003255205,0.00033657317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035054286,0.0017998624,0.001980154,0.0018244315,0.0018741962,0.0050346414,0.001406245,0.0029193012,0.07955181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005374737,0.00059649505,0.0008480557,0.001828841,0.003084047,0.0054403897,0.0044310363,0.005814833,0.05765234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007019277,0.00002718747,0.00023421724,0.00035166345,0.000045377514,0.00013807991,0.00025324864,0.00045828198,0.00043992742,0.31199768,0.59566,0.09032419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014229294,0.000008398399,0.00039517938,0.00010143932,0.000006943764,0.00008555654,0.000032090527,0.00012438672,0.00021531816,0.06770737,0.9312975,0.000011562013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021430086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011275777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07955181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028415206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028983364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26612735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580295213","doi":"10.1177/0048393114553574","title":"Book Review: <i>Learn to Write Badly. How to Succeed in the Social Sciences</i> by Michael Billig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0919750085330256,"score_gpt":0.3852852308740106,"score_spread":0.293310222340985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580295213","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016640317,0.45891774,0.0013659165,0.23355079,0.24005124,0.00009951286,0.00036443394,0.00031729616,0.065166675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022505284,0.32069212,0.0015190329,0.12858176,0.101177275,0.00019713475,0.0005009968,0.0004137528,0.4446674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983392,0.00031089553,0.00009431607,0.00015766737,0.001011787,0.000086094784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913824,0.0032161998,0.00050282624,0.00018698045,0.0037428613,0.0009687241],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017326411,0.0010421651,0.0014732463,0.0022118737,0.0011702045,0.0052212104,0.0016142258,0.0034962576,0.06351525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014086781,0.0005408291,0.0007200426,0.0025471142,0.0014285076,0.004220066,0.0014899331,0.0068476484,0.07131777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020394257,0.0000015189918,0.0000071803597,0.000099408746,0.0000017803478,0.0000067408164,0.000007379252,0.0000069598022,0.000016290025,0.0003878676,0.9884864,0.01097628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043663067,0.0000063904795,0.00007034031,0.000415032,0.0000038821477,0.00010828311,0.000021143227,0.000013493971,0.000026481208,0.0006505524,0.99867415,0.0000057605084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038061661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009930121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99826735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020627356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042602895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21247965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727015543","doi":"10.1177/0048393115612037","title":"Book Review: <i>The Customization of Science: The Impact of Religious and Political Worldviews on Contemporary Science</i> , by Steve Fuller, Mikael Stenmark, and Ulf Zackarisson, eds.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Personalization; Social science; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Business","score_opus":0.06840583609972,"score_gpt":0.3396531001921719,"score_spread":0.27124726409245187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727015543","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010047277,0.89759773,0.00024628945,0.037149996,0.04349578,0.00002096625,0.0002815548,0.000054605214,0.02105262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013699434,0.861635,0.0003995885,0.022468716,0.041376725,0.000059398426,0.0005589454,0.00008234835,0.0720494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.0001234335,0.000052655974,0.00011306067,0.0005473533,0.000056142293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962291,0.0017811187,0.00026745675,0.00008592987,0.0013650374,0.00027135995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088807783,0.0013043432,0.0018015201,0.003353294,0.000900596,0.0043665594,0.001821979,0.002554341,0.038104575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005638641,0.0005397414,0.00073986343,0.007405243,0.001485426,0.003926149,0.0013583881,0.003790208,0.029666048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049252226,0.0000035974158,0.000025274549,0.00044985523,0.0000061293745,0.000007687988,0.000016917566,0.00002666682,0.000027049435,0.0007024301,0.9723021,0.0264274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050259127,0.0000068390227,0.00021486514,0.00082924805,0.000008935126,0.00008063677,0.00003196208,0.000019254794,0.000025002439,0.00083553593,0.997936,0.0000065880536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00853586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02351704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99909943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025886097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049429615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12747246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770478525","doi":"10.1177/0048393117741335","title":"Regretful Decisions and Climate Change","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Economics; Incentive; Analogy; Greenhouse gas; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.41823636927092056,"score_gpt":0.3573625981778164,"score_spread":0.060873771093104156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770478525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35201415,0.040153995,0.08259882,0.16437235,0.00204862,0.00007034631,0.00042588817,0.00013759748,0.35817823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688614,0.0041077407,0.0016807712,0.0016276097,0.00052549585,0.000018793331,0.000035825495,0.000012960444,0.00510461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983352,0.0009767364,0.00005004456,0.0001740707,0.00024707426,0.00021683623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903302,0.0065797353,0.0016959604,0.00039978337,0.00048607413,0.0005081941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028908206,0.0003131599,0.00035325802,0.00044925508,0.0009836564,0.0023246561,0.0004566712,0.002104977,0.005433041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012513246,0.0001569216,0.0004310552,0.0004885079,0.0043506427,0.0023429964,0.001223514,0.0025154466,0.00030370912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047226178,0.000041452917,0.0019920077,0.000052489824,0.000036221965,0.00015964256,0.00031781005,0.009569669,0.00010762409,0.9725792,0.003996867,0.011099795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012405656,0.000014046997,0.0013298999,0.00002538041,0.00000840644,0.000042281223,0.00011629294,0.005927225,0.000034734174,0.9862665,0.006214244,0.000008575529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001898235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015129052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005433041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021480068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007614278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018175364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770668376","doi":"10.1177/0048393117742337","title":"Beyond the Self-Legislation Model of Democracy: James Bohman’s Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Reflexivity; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.10255606307960076,"score_gpt":0.35769966416454246,"score_spread":0.2551436010849417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770668376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014593505,0.029990885,0.17966607,0.20453523,0.002386914,0.0001482745,0.00013066536,0.00012451908,0.5684239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284347,0.01465334,0.053946234,0.03244338,0.0034267097,0.00046772082,0.000091141614,0.00016989055,0.066366985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280363,0.0043927096,0.00017816841,0.00070755795,0.0013683182,0.0005497628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549085,0.0033099898,0.000228059,0.0003253416,0.0003917436,0.0002539598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073055094,0.00052506785,0.00074133213,0.001886155,0.005355897,0.0071788398,0.0015715236,0.004197733,0.0033944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069462257,0.00042057966,0.0009899267,0.0018351951,0.032110203,0.0093588475,0.003793989,0.008934314,0.000740094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018988411,0.0000043704986,0.000016538776,0.000007560365,0.0000012042461,0.0000057526095,0.00024256526,0.00017843781,0.000007334538,0.9978452,0.0010730556,0.0006160776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061815786,0.0000038719204,0.00002933599,0.000021735761,0.0000013736703,0.000007024635,0.00007967591,0.0003473105,0.000027733864,0.9766559,0.022815203,0.0000046857926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059701507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00505366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073055094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068958267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050032973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2829595292","doi":"10.1177/0048393118785344","title":"Response to Shankman","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11992199939804714,"score_gpt":0.3076061002870782,"score_spread":0.18768410088903104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2829595292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016836352,0.0012550829,0.00007446871,0.9475772,0.048409767,0.0000066063744,0.00005232483,0.000057915768,0.0023982674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034074255,0.00071082084,0.00011483314,0.9687312,0.015134547,0.000033517612,0.000028949375,0.000066466666,0.011772092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944483,0.0014499518,0.0003822014,0.0009236859,0.0021276975,0.00066818896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98245865,0.0060852207,0.0010198633,0.0006691181,0.0072293635,0.0025378661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048021493,0.001173674,0.0015069519,0.0009006895,0.0059333276,0.005130226,0.0025699022,0.024449645,0.014838458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04938261,0.00059293373,0.0009137335,0.00097104214,0.004415948,0.0048708115,0.0034079154,0.042650882,0.01134124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008443743,0.0000033395447,0.000042830354,0.000014695834,0.0000017314215,0.000060484872,0.00009238211,0.000008149222,0.000017015242,0.0007492964,0.99779797,0.0012035606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000119488,0.000012998435,0.0003787027,0.00018038272,0.00000588404,0.00029090882,0.0009047186,0.00007078192,0.00011948739,0.002034987,0.9959488,0.000040302104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010456759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013721151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024449645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005232377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075792465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049639583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902138217","doi":"10.1177/0048393118814765","title":"The Limited Rationality of Technology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Quackery; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10193172145835297,"score_gpt":0.2945589212820564,"score_spread":0.19262719982370344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902138217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022741446,0.01737514,0.068621755,0.11384233,0.00083456765,0.00006956057,0.00019574063,0.00015384224,0.7761657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90881747,0.0074820323,0.013144726,0.009197244,0.0007084876,0.00022278844,0.00007788352,0.00010453053,0.06024475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921218,0.0041277832,0.00025485293,0.0011014552,0.0018048056,0.00058935257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897395,0.007400769,0.00043419393,0.0014805829,0.0007076327,0.00023737765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058493256,0.00063740014,0.0007031943,0.0015077909,0.0029476045,0.010149282,0.0012742152,0.004843754,0.0042244485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013713514,0.00042417154,0.0008473748,0.0010034355,0.03300644,0.010644654,0.0043333923,0.0041549196,0.0013664211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007630345,0.000003368482,0.00003949334,0.000014569443,0.0000032956896,0.000017811826,0.00032009583,0.00054659357,0.000036463283,0.99604553,0.0015757247,0.0013894996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073941796,0.0000049264077,0.00005611091,0.00004792564,0.000002791419,0.000014324275,0.00014521633,0.00055124337,0.0001059677,0.9717934,0.027264105,0.0000064658784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005046901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002690258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053246715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045065912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038633406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902683547","doi":"10.1177/0048393118811308","title":"Classical Cybernetics and Transhumanism: A Reply to Richmond’s Review of <i>The Nature of the Machine and the Collapse of Cybernetics</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Cybernetics; Epistemology; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Posthuman; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047731689158093275,"score_gpt":0.3331632144372865,"score_spread":0.28543152527919324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902683547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078474014,0.2786254,0.0020485506,0.69833064,0.013644649,0.000006443837,0.00004217402,0.00002411102,0.0064932033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05462717,0.21025626,0.0036436543,0.6528992,0.0538289,0.00007414851,0.00008053966,0.0002035483,0.024386665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564207,0.0024843013,0.00020552827,0.0005025067,0.00092651614,0.00023911761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839346,0.012948809,0.00050951756,0.0003085548,0.0018956312,0.00040294937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006153718,0.00078786793,0.0010294787,0.0029228593,0.0030073468,0.0067164237,0.002305338,0.011315776,0.0028744447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014598869,0.0005275792,0.0008581807,0.002448561,0.015194693,0.013504449,0.0031125455,0.013911594,0.00093980326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027991722,0.000007880232,0.00013214783,0.0005015314,0.0000260217,0.00018543625,0.0035181716,0.00019932617,0.00008209637,0.35098445,0.6293492,0.014985723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007060889,0.000013687733,0.00024628913,0.0012638126,0.000011407196,0.00027369047,0.0015750806,0.00023318209,0.00016496087,0.10295364,0.8932244,0.000032764096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015025809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023015564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015025809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007246904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048461105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052580178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904530011","doi":"10.1177/0048393118810820","title":"Institutions as a Philosophical Problem: A Critical Rationalist Perspective on Guala’s “Understanding Institutions” and His Critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Institution; Rationalism; Relation (database); Critical philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy of science; Social institution; Critical theory; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.2973331015280518,"score_gpt":0.4699058722947969,"score_spread":0.1725727707667451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904530011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012339462,0.014965705,0.013642996,0.897051,0.0024454826,0.000040956158,0.000031413467,0.000098651406,0.059384275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.779015,0.006914642,0.008528653,0.18422481,0.005040954,0.00034475257,0.000027897633,0.00023519254,0.015668098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347396,0.010814587,0.00035271363,0.0017901235,0.0023641512,0.0012045602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96910614,0.024162984,0.0014027787,0.0010956152,0.0034672697,0.00076524686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017696168,0.0008377124,0.001083178,0.0048037833,0.009697105,0.01085372,0.0028323303,0.013550347,0.0016401706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036328577,0.0004839358,0.001116026,0.0028846571,0.06905862,0.010320191,0.004449024,0.016239518,0.00034543083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548109,0.0000048716392,0.000050644114,0.000037117596,0.000005044573,0.000057888272,0.0058675697,0.0001460692,0.0000307989,0.97969216,0.012844398,0.0012539327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024795285,0.000011905727,0.0002184593,0.00037765503,0.00001977654,0.00008606339,0.0041428865,0.00086212193,0.00033125994,0.792411,0.20146433,0.00004972613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014170248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095224045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017696168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017140795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12436575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913809085","doi":"10.1177/0048393118821185","title":"The Essential Ambiguity of the Social","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Individuation; Subject matter; Abstraction; Sociological theory; Subject (documents); Social science; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.09251651652523513,"score_gpt":0.3846651635164567,"score_spread":0.29214864699122156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913809085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12702143,0.00898694,0.27065197,0.18624978,0.002741275,0.0002566729,0.00030494138,0.00023282575,0.40355417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595881,0.0016868667,0.025275135,0.00448432,0.00085684535,0.00029124907,0.00006620629,0.000080048136,0.007671215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823445,0.0092402175,0.00097123085,0.0025539545,0.0042962003,0.0005938331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887826,0.005971763,0.0010814748,0.002477689,0.0011427805,0.0005437279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013862938,0.0005626756,0.0008618802,0.001796055,0.0054759397,0.011781024,0.0017059791,0.0036890232,0.0024464547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013008431,0.00043574645,0.0005279681,0.0015161147,0.079267345,0.01049996,0.0077174637,0.006396644,0.00067636766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069695016,0.000007849932,0.00016365932,0.000027998729,0.0000031948593,0.000017789593,0.0046129096,0.000053063843,0.00015838009,0.9905647,0.00045213095,0.0039313426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008561603,0.000019396408,0.00040367164,0.000101852595,0.000005351137,0.00007028134,0.0037667535,0.00020562236,0.00021497004,0.966683,0.028509406,0.0000112043035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013012028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014872284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013862938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004998837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067769815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073315084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923201854","doi":"10.1177/0048393119835159","title":"Testing Political Philosophies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Health care; Positive economics; Test (biology); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09717451848931953,"score_gpt":0.3569969141272697,"score_spread":0.2598223956379502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923201854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31540576,0.0044275997,0.059618957,0.12008386,0.0017939039,0.0004588272,0.002025839,0.00023002097,0.4959552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846481,0.000765102,0.006167266,0.0055318247,0.0006165893,0.00039559946,0.00039663797,0.00003874958,0.0014401564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9492367,0.03176602,0.0017678114,0.0066555943,0.00838147,0.0021922844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6242069,0.3200104,0.021979699,0.017373962,0.013994723,0.0024343117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042338435,0.0010317739,0.0013708639,0.0038071086,0.0033749924,0.0074049165,0.0024607258,0.005162505,0.026758906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22471257,0.00040763995,0.0011727805,0.00409657,0.026885534,0.012364793,0.005370543,0.0059573906,0.0016455043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026501587,0.00026461916,0.011785204,0.00037570315,0.00022045434,0.0001198577,0.0024109303,0.0009916279,0.00025596574,0.9599633,0.003464366,0.019883014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021421001,0.00024571738,0.009959316,0.00039278113,0.00009645925,0.00009597403,0.005410316,0.0038558815,0.00072375836,0.95863175,0.020337025,0.00003672174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012672438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000647248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042338435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003702629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035049887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22390968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945417839","doi":"10.1177/0048393119848651","title":"Book Review: <i>Raymond Aron’s Philosophy of Political Responsibility: Freedom, Democracy, and National Identity</i> by Christopher Adair-Toteff","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Identity (music); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02792936002231646,"score_gpt":0.33952392164024014,"score_spread":0.3115945616179237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945417839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000092843315,0.5448513,0.00056595803,0.23335423,0.1646707,0.000033766726,0.00022654422,0.000063034575,0.056141645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027218559,0.4310483,0.0006035244,0.17391899,0.13773447,0.00010802995,0.00032155687,0.00016439315,0.25337887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985915,0.00029322336,0.0000652161,0.00020992915,0.00076346676,0.00007665042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950589,0.0027428926,0.00022273797,0.00013480127,0.0014780033,0.00036259755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001528101,0.0011529675,0.0014627115,0.0027728581,0.001554347,0.0043792627,0.0018906397,0.00451269,0.02763486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008111523,0.00055495335,0.00063710654,0.004430935,0.0032231687,0.0047543785,0.001702682,0.008456783,0.016675873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001965568,0.0000022813078,0.000007853473,0.00009159545,0.0000017142336,0.000003306311,0.000012773963,0.0000137010775,0.0000073072547,0.002619809,0.9901149,0.007122748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029457256,0.0000020190953,0.000043452397,0.00025352996,0.0000021417982,0.000022773933,0.000016574899,0.000010946869,0.000009010208,0.0016518779,0.997981,0.000003817462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013457535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02944611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02763486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044388236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046111955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09244782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952348066","doi":"10.1177/0048393119853246","title":"The Problem of Analytic Philosophy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; CLARITY; Philosophy; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Contemporary philosophy; History; Chemistry","score_opus":0.055144092311710476,"score_gpt":0.2620848180873566,"score_spread":0.20694072577564615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952348066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046788664,0.06723707,0.061185747,0.5633192,0.008045767,0.000045700923,0.00023242754,0.00020405005,0.29505122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6494155,0.037634213,0.07653829,0.11441968,0.036008865,0.0005186523,0.0003495702,0.00073008315,0.084385216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820333,0.011524121,0.00053878216,0.0018511686,0.0033828616,0.0006698222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97162,0.020848436,0.0007252594,0.0033048466,0.0026801494,0.0008212633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0186269,0.00084242603,0.0014718636,0.003385054,0.0082191685,0.013123249,0.0025838492,0.00660812,0.006556847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034291822,0.00065456657,0.0014592014,0.0026489557,0.06758601,0.025705071,0.0077044126,0.018286804,0.0019195599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025665036,0.0000027856743,0.000020920827,0.0000135307355,0.0000023672596,0.0000057275747,0.00045724586,0.000025506812,0.0000061485134,0.9914875,0.00662984,0.0013458782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000408268,0.0000019957372,0.000018788729,0.000034664445,9.398684e-7,0.000012923444,0.00021554588,0.00010382095,0.000011409676,0.9628647,0.036728535,0.0000026151188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005182578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029870577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0186269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011777887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007885935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09850961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998289355","doi":"10.1177/0048393119894901","title":"Optimism for Naturalized Social Metaphysics: A Reply to Hawley","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Naturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08163381641922365,"score_gpt":0.4007705191296468,"score_spread":0.31913670271042316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998289355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042797765,0.005418184,0.0007195919,0.98947024,0.002340169,0.0000029009786,0.000012725801,0.000010116974,0.0015980938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055116575,0.011595282,0.0027595568,0.90328836,0.023746388,0.000073262345,0.000041508978,0.000069442554,0.00330955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731506,0.0074002133,0.0004287457,0.0018246114,0.002565301,0.00046603466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89902395,0.08815679,0.0021765218,0.003134831,0.0048296424,0.0026783322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03780182,0.0007112083,0.0018517817,0.0020868618,0.0047278777,0.00700638,0.003842533,0.02360625,0.0063570705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071094766,0.00064141455,0.0013226595,0.0019082178,0.048979484,0.023944555,0.006010887,0.048442736,0.0019008216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070685965,0.000068122165,0.00037242044,0.00015211455,0.0000331048,0.000112052345,0.0016075819,0.0003374838,0.00006526463,0.6653727,0.3223529,0.009455535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008515943,0.000022110054,0.00032443518,0.00025098684,0.00000973655,0.000120448916,0.0009185135,0.000578712,0.00009842011,0.886172,0.111364335,0.000055103315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055635422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003597123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03780182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067296927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004761421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1999175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010770414","doi":"10.1177/0048393120911130","title":"A Closer Look at the Business Case for Diversity: The Tangled Web of Equity and Epistemic Benefits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Epistemology; Inequality; Social identity theory; Positive economics; Public relations; Law and economics; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Economics; Social group; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16989109170196304,"score_gpt":0.355833169299732,"score_spread":0.18594207759776898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010770414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07151161,0.0137144495,0.037124574,0.21356389,0.0011032788,0.000033020267,0.00006350672,0.000042988006,0.66284263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699402,0.0041837045,0.0054998365,0.008729993,0.00065076567,0.000046041423,0.000025352057,0.000061303464,0.010862818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950212,0.003009985,0.00007134135,0.00039900604,0.0009392273,0.00055935385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255496,0.005754344,0.00035253481,0.00043135835,0.0004406246,0.0004662037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006025372,0.00044657543,0.0006758,0.0027364632,0.005975208,0.013757743,0.0009780839,0.0054337475,0.00908184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008551435,0.00025548707,0.00050260994,0.0019781648,0.04429182,0.02779811,0.011945082,0.009072566,0.0005259685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060307807,0.000007127797,0.00019374593,0.000018515924,0.0000021531937,0.00007290864,0.0043939543,0.00006832391,0.00009622581,0.99171925,0.0007195539,0.0027022788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006021725,0.000012030979,0.0005138085,0.00015060604,0.00000425243,0.0001517628,0.010437799,0.00027459077,0.00013166695,0.939029,0.049278874,0.000009554163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025054405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030942261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013757743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053273137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024545616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03865254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101802699","doi":"10.1177/0048393120967890","title":"Popper and Kuhn: A Different Retrospect","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Humanity; Normal science; Enlightenment; Karl popper; sort; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.12528623192351035,"score_gpt":0.26189653336399116,"score_spread":0.1366103014404808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101802699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011440511,0.04544966,0.0028170547,0.7726203,0.0040889126,0.000023475792,0.0001033812,0.000045698762,0.16341089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52799976,0.03695825,0.0024121404,0.3174782,0.006589983,0.00012509372,0.00007249362,0.00036478843,0.107999206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544734,0.0025492124,0.00010659929,0.0006453346,0.00089372124,0.00035788777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367464,0.004438551,0.0002786789,0.00036482431,0.0008897375,0.00035362414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003918844,0.0005569171,0.00053665554,0.0016751862,0.0075706607,0.008033901,0.0010490642,0.0067860517,0.004545758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018215189,0.00049770996,0.000348972,0.0020302364,0.025134334,0.017130934,0.0056592966,0.010127936,0.0010786976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003253597,0.000012888531,0.0001403651,0.00008335898,0.000009277925,0.00022007097,0.0110413665,0.00008495244,0.00006774827,0.8829211,0.09594163,0.009444726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010356297,0.000009146689,0.00021685158,0.00021511456,0.0000048202746,0.0002243743,0.0058775526,0.00006257929,0.00026680983,0.16879031,0.82429266,0.000029378778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012460205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008974446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063698906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003547454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046216965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107918712","doi":"10.1177/0048393120976116","title":"Science <i>sans</i> Subjectivity: The Sad Case of Imre Lakatos","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Objectivism; Sociology","score_opus":0.0829614894202098,"score_gpt":0.2775732555394789,"score_spread":0.19461176611926911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107918712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098292306,0.012699262,0.011262331,0.5269452,0.0026977041,0.000037469486,0.000070443944,0.00016987785,0.3478255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93503755,0.0021424028,0.0020469376,0.030591924,0.0011479991,0.00004330987,0.000017900318,0.00014173969,0.028830254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973679,0.0017054019,0.000059813392,0.00028932127,0.0003312555,0.0002462797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967152,0.0021503263,0.00023168726,0.00026492518,0.0003752552,0.00026272066],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003752482,0.00032886508,0.00036517045,0.00084630155,0.010044381,0.005089307,0.0006212812,0.0041927127,0.0016531636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007907759,0.00026491666,0.00024163772,0.00055223855,0.029915296,0.0082800165,0.003278145,0.00958009,0.0007077344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032367632,0.00000908361,0.00019825745,0.000023251536,0.0000034103064,0.0003801121,0.020201698,0.000054706994,0.00014604609,0.9551942,0.020609574,0.003147331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022866927,0.000022035687,0.00022180629,0.00010471324,0.0000081802455,0.0007354752,0.013428787,0.00043765496,0.0007706751,0.68280417,0.301413,0.000030552674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024588162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00269667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025933636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015764221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019845247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129608361","doi":"10.1177/0048393121995402","title":"Book Review: Review of King <i>Gods of the Upper Air. How a Circle of Renegade Anthropologists Reinvented Race, Sex, and Gender in the Twentieth Century</i> by Charles King","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06605063029345176,"score_gpt":0.30959961284984916,"score_spread":0.2435489825563974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129608361","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003658439,0.9648878,0.000028988065,0.016362429,0.016333483,0.0000068017116,0.00007817334,0.000007325585,0.0022583443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00066000246,0.9453609,0.00009220007,0.027761064,0.016663909,0.00002773448,0.00014160854,0.0000147372575,0.00927783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991611,0.00016682304,0.00010641289,0.00010228885,0.00039357095,0.00006982368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577314,0.0019088351,0.00038296616,0.00005962647,0.0015397621,0.0003356877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011832521,0.00089322135,0.0021593662,0.0032436932,0.00091387244,0.003059073,0.0016523376,0.0030338992,0.0133894095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062231175,0.00045507855,0.00066754443,0.0061134505,0.0015288083,0.002587615,0.0013262768,0.005349481,0.008500297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015806601,0.0000067089445,0.000036531514,0.0026316203,0.000016520671,0.00002319696,0.00004495922,0.000012791509,0.000034656976,0.0005825595,0.9629594,0.033635158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012529125,0.000010377565,0.00036817283,0.004304943,0.000029199708,0.00018903024,0.000058200618,0.000006640855,0.000019143228,0.00030094542,0.99469084,0.000009939903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009497458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027643664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133894095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025979942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048611276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044792056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215235437","doi":"10.1177/00483931211049770","title":"How to Put the Cart Behind the Horse in the Cultural Evolution of Gender","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Cart; Sociology; Division (mathematics); Social learning; Epistemology; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13565969767814762,"score_gpt":0.3911043388502115,"score_spread":0.2554446411720639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215235437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17054865,0.026401592,0.10522543,0.4616354,0.0035922995,0.000056573903,0.00024226953,0.00021444607,0.23208329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603242,0.003915287,0.015576103,0.00889655,0.00039168645,0.00003488574,0.000029924675,0.0000891595,0.010742203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998776,0.0006907028,0.00002420756,0.0002426478,0.00012131354,0.00014517807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970969,0.0016575614,0.00024374451,0.00039320087,0.00030374384,0.0003048286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037388434,0.0004010578,0.00057562115,0.0008645501,0.0024551805,0.004708712,0.0009727519,0.0031845293,0.007158267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008072233,0.00034940493,0.0004939048,0.00064756366,0.025903136,0.012888827,0.00188198,0.003722485,0.0010896807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024946954,0.000011615826,0.00097546406,0.000020466237,0.000012467918,0.0000669205,0.0035031175,0.00060889364,0.0001409446,0.98244053,0.003117078,0.0090775695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011516032,0.0000148049385,0.0006824452,0.00005843356,0.0000063442126,0.0000689519,0.0018637283,0.00090728916,0.00011702231,0.97211635,0.02413376,0.000019273515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007997069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006093988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007997069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020355277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012388368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023946822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254280","doi":"10.1177/004839310203200106","title":"A Touch of Malice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1680075636996223,"score_gpt":0.39996972535703207,"score_spread":0.23196216165740977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053436025,0.014988226,0.0015037435,0.8900432,0.011294076,0.000015640782,0.00003474467,0.00006279111,0.076713964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23397899,0.006020436,0.0010971423,0.66241735,0.009375124,0.00008335772,0.000038260336,0.00027841903,0.08671096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844928,0.008744413,0.0003630495,0.0013420501,0.002724109,0.0023336944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791144,0.008756499,0.0011692888,0.0026388566,0.0032502569,0.0050706672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013493928,0.0007265834,0.0015189497,0.0019670012,0.021998098,0.014707462,0.0017930748,0.011453691,0.010446806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03551912,0.0004518539,0.0007073585,0.0011108217,0.071038544,0.015859377,0.013505962,0.04315832,0.0026334906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054465745,0.00005861735,0.0010829892,0.00008728205,0.00002614624,0.00047820833,0.042620506,0.000082964856,0.00015764758,0.65781444,0.28218788,0.015348823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021387596,0.00002551634,0.00057545875,0.00033849778,0.000008712111,0.00048107066,0.027972111,0.00008834023,0.0001278003,0.20931242,0.7610019,0.00004676865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008563815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015183578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021998098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005862131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009304007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07136357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251963311","doi":"10.1177/0048393111428793","title":"Bunge Nevertheless","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meritocracy; Egalitarianism; Politics; Democracy; Participatory democracy; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Socialism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Political science; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06605458671813488,"score_gpt":0.33071621174422705,"score_spread":0.26466162502609214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251963311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020745425,0.026662048,0.004099267,0.10630588,0.0154695,0.000041804127,0.0002812621,0.00044747363,0.84461814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021120159,0.0043688095,0.0014946037,0.030303886,0.001940215,0.00005960416,0.0001623996,0.0002874688,0.9402628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858177,0.00030070898,0.00004150609,0.00044870374,0.00043252358,0.00019479699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.00020849962,0.000046163244,0.00011683385,0.00019322311,0.00012313592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011495984,0.000792791,0.00052543334,0.00081326655,0.004080294,0.0057509392,0.0009168189,0.0048763133,0.08398433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003587744,0.00033956018,0.0003401223,0.00084659393,0.0022839056,0.00452441,0.0035569866,0.0064190794,0.037604664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402349,0.0000275121,0.00019144706,0.00008055207,0.000007372467,0.00011661023,0.0009501257,0.00008853768,0.00034122195,0.40953335,0.55024976,0.03837939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016406184,0.000002957081,0.00007024219,0.000037749123,9.534633e-7,0.000045654797,0.00011214816,0.000027696738,0.00007914665,0.0098317815,0.9897864,0.0000037148054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063127847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011026412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08398433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025018656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017063445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28095555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255187153","doi":"10.1177/004839310203200306","title":"Kuhn’s Way","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1616693254135196,"score_gpt":0.26482444421695744,"score_spread":0.10315511880343783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255187153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041664545,0.002095023,0.022587229,0.009677256,0.0011698598,0.00004428165,0.00015264054,0.00014177656,0.9599655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38346204,0.002148118,0.018586822,0.009120808,0.0010169419,0.00027265638,0.00018547104,0.00039132204,0.5848158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981286,0.0006665488,0.0000625804,0.0005698019,0.00029862532,0.00027377857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.00025817216,0.000038728722,0.00022870822,0.00015117209,0.000054562835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010974464,0.0006273285,0.0005882285,0.001631155,0.004882926,0.0055421195,0.0006636167,0.002335828,0.02968301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041987314,0.00042583016,0.0007409013,0.0011429584,0.010401558,0.007933291,0.0027805746,0.0048652007,0.007034771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000472848,0.000003910988,0.000034689856,0.0000061234273,0.0000024574113,0.0000074132913,0.00031858485,0.00003042866,0.000020845051,0.9912219,0.005549189,0.0027997328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008658211,0.0000051598577,0.000070544156,0.000016322945,0.000003953666,0.000036149893,0.00018747352,0.00008290788,0.00006327941,0.8618953,0.1376228,0.0000074406335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00575458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00692182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99511707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026427498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017814654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281397358","doi":"10.1177/00483931221080999","title":"Jeremy Bentham’s Social Ontology: Fictionality, Factuality and Language Critique","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Reification (Marxism); Sociology; Ontology; Social constructionism; Ethnomethodology; Pragmatism; Ordinary language philosophy; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Western philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08927775559887599,"score_gpt":0.33936268588367097,"score_spread":0.25008493028479495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281397358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034063853,0.044485092,0.04905261,0.33341005,0.0043114116,0.00004953987,0.00012229051,0.00012380428,0.53438133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927405,0.008595401,0.008987439,0.0180136,0.0027914753,0.00009821988,0.00006233109,0.00013544147,0.033911113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475807,0.0035731506,0.00012283749,0.00039318867,0.0009040489,0.0002486279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947738,0.003854308,0.00020989063,0.00030601528,0.00065642473,0.00019962002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036997069,0.0006072564,0.00052255346,0.00303904,0.006976971,0.007329201,0.0012923465,0.004010337,0.0017167887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074026776,0.00026862393,0.00043948102,0.002020518,0.055386968,0.008327229,0.004008056,0.005411995,0.0003587267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020607622,0.0000022840968,0.000024534424,0.000014475212,0.0000013648659,0.00003251151,0.0073366226,0.000050914667,0.000019197018,0.98745966,0.003323833,0.0017326034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004407284,0.0000038072162,0.00008725321,0.000063064064,0.0000027587075,0.00006046015,0.003823399,0.00023483802,0.000085418986,0.886988,0.108640015,0.000006610731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013535524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012424142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013535524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073715593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040576123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05348468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285728504","doi":"10.1177/00483931221096401","title":"Popper and Agassi at Odds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Odds; Critical rationalism; Epistemology; Individualism; Optimism; Perfectionism (psychology); Institutionalism; Karl popper; Methodological individualism; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.07430619505446288,"score_gpt":0.26131637104792727,"score_spread":0.18701017599346437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285728504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009703683,0.017507331,0.0060221883,0.38942286,0.0035886373,0.000029312041,0.000092678514,0.00011264597,0.57352066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6481302,0.012906322,0.005399596,0.16138703,0.0072294483,0.0002156358,0.000093315684,0.00034709193,0.16429143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446976,0.0022783792,0.00014067562,0.0011564528,0.0014365412,0.000518132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948813,0.003203883,0.00024900684,0.00056310184,0.0007498045,0.0003528699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004610537,0.0007201469,0.0010786144,0.0022502344,0.006321609,0.008670291,0.0012484821,0.008613394,0.009480777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012652249,0.00044791918,0.00045397502,0.0018782887,0.026914578,0.009819507,0.0055855876,0.010398889,0.0023495983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012701936,0.000005638003,0.000074759504,0.000022716084,0.0000043520063,0.00004082618,0.0009876955,0.000042495933,0.000024347222,0.97076136,0.02406174,0.003961329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011217727,0.000006827816,0.0001840811,0.00011929263,0.000006949414,0.00010437625,0.00090141315,0.00014424817,0.00014303761,0.77019364,0.22817132,0.000013527859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034526521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024024725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045857965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034372003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033272505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320917298","doi":"10.1177/00483931221148428","title":"Robert K. Merton, Cudos and Magical Thinking in the Age of Covid","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Scope (computer science); Magical thinking; Epistemology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Disease; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Computer science","score_opus":0.15128235740566956,"score_gpt":0.45391052135400983,"score_spread":0.30262816394834025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320917298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075221056,0.056420263,0.00082797586,0.9092987,0.011070284,0.000008183311,0.000016526299,0.000030832907,0.021575063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1634756,0.1351272,0.0058888756,0.5496425,0.02496786,0.00013712031,0.000037143167,0.00031089212,0.12041274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959423,0.0021213833,0.00015623604,0.00043690755,0.0011131032,0.00023007915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98802793,0.007451335,0.0006055535,0.0004868918,0.0019446017,0.0014837973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068852706,0.00048333168,0.00068219466,0.0013560602,0.0078059407,0.0068835034,0.00092811516,0.0046296413,0.005639464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019189745,0.000485765,0.000305519,0.0008212689,0.022324475,0.01307455,0.0033998939,0.01797737,0.0015806442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003658678,0.000025221068,0.00032767808,0.00008757841,0.000007999099,0.000115704315,0.0042348905,0.00007544297,0.000052462354,0.3453592,0.63254416,0.017133022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015378033,0.0000135695645,0.0002172145,0.00041082714,0.000003684728,0.00022615599,0.0032810317,0.00009535466,0.00009005786,0.17901103,0.8166049,0.000030739597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010245468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020444911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010245468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004602275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053140023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036413252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379880780","doi":"10.1177/00483931231181641","title":"What Is Non-Inevitable?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"York University","keywords":"Epistemology; Intuition; Social constructionism; Sociology; Strict constructionism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12686539088672863,"score_gpt":0.40999355776085766,"score_spread":0.283128166874129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379880780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18954839,0.007157784,0.17331417,0.101277635,0.0025303408,0.00015113837,0.00024782424,0.0002876804,0.525485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820661,0.0008672675,0.007041448,0.0023426777,0.00049932906,0.00007195343,0.00007432348,0.00007502565,0.0069619846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936014,0.0027778025,0.00038324075,0.0013919955,0.0013047041,0.0005408078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890682,0.0065972055,0.000866282,0.001447423,0.0015449775,0.00047598983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006764098,0.00037606942,0.00048524947,0.00087772665,0.003839019,0.0036853345,0.0010726225,0.0020471283,0.0044124923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016226681,0.00029567225,0.0007232336,0.00043258633,0.02569619,0.011479836,0.0033621327,0.0044209864,0.0005830476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021057009,0.000012262852,0.00081448077,0.00007711021,0.000009724742,0.0002008181,0.0025837766,0.00013901881,0.00035242087,0.99005073,0.0010945757,0.004643979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004312222,0.000013049044,0.0004506452,0.000053511027,0.0000052694554,0.00020940887,0.0013139604,0.00031169117,0.00032446408,0.9747413,0.022561466,0.000010933831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010294772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001128525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006764098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021516513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017565021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035772383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385755367","doi":"10.1177/00483931231181930","title":"Instrumental Rationality in the Social Sciences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Rationality; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Subjectivism; Philosophy of science; Simple (philosophy); Counterexample; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Ecological rationality; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3416999638884397,"score_gpt":0.39650368724829543,"score_spread":0.05480372335985573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385755367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045617405,0.035017192,0.21004131,0.20473762,0.0020965263,0.00010463933,0.00012809483,0.00022172247,0.50203544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941923,0.008317602,0.023251377,0.009102215,0.001537207,0.00019000852,0.00005112513,0.000062792875,0.015564704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959124,0.0026540048,0.00007950136,0.00029336603,0.0008221422,0.00023847872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479055,0.004043835,0.00020590765,0.00042356458,0.00031268678,0.0002234938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006334121,0.00043319355,0.00059253594,0.0013302503,0.0018557884,0.003983808,0.0012640763,0.00265674,0.0036901275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006277718,0.00023818853,0.00064541236,0.00082245225,0.01836178,0.004052867,0.0031590865,0.0046037366,0.0005784679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017614124,0.0000044761255,0.000031716205,0.000012032006,0.000002663298,0.000006319915,0.00008652072,0.00022749067,0.000015999782,0.99806577,0.0004389548,0.0011062428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023218415,0.0000015945384,0.00003789641,0.000010510625,5.7716767e-7,0.000003123128,0.000023943217,0.00027135425,0.000014860317,0.9966738,0.0029588973,0.0000011179867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016032808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009437788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006334121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037137363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024792454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033498466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394754256","doi":"10.1177/00483931241246069","title":"Phenomenology, Cultural Meaning, and the Curious Case of Suicide: Localizing the Structure-Culture Dialectic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Sociology; Dialectic; Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Negation; Meaning (existential); Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Qualitative research; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046442409287695635,"score_gpt":0.3533118385948806,"score_spread":0.30686942930718497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394754256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20402543,0.06703479,0.12875542,0.34045643,0.0041997875,0.00030706628,0.00016146757,0.00016541273,0.2548942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97376436,0.008100804,0.008382197,0.006273465,0.00046153882,0.00020522413,0.00002419604,0.000057501857,0.0027307495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775957,0.019700848,0.00043683412,0.0007014774,0.0009911346,0.00057397434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97806156,0.01809481,0.0010589418,0.0016544483,0.00059570826,0.0005345529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017825413,0.00069407787,0.0009736722,0.0043100324,0.011543222,0.012658607,0.0025669336,0.006049804,0.0013011533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018393625,0.0005410941,0.00073046196,0.0034308576,0.15868725,0.020933561,0.011899621,0.007287608,0.00019764356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010421334,0.000011109756,0.0004975558,0.00013169134,0.0000060227544,0.00036953867,0.20107706,0.00010830806,0.00009086637,0.7933508,0.0011940293,0.0031526447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016398897,0.00002238569,0.00046851725,0.0008664314,0.000010395103,0.0011451552,0.22006835,0.00030372135,0.00022639942,0.72352237,0.053316776,0.00003300386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056085363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005991551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017825413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007957454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005704404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094270885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396780530","doi":"10.1177/00483931241248823","title":"Book Review: A Way Through the Global Techno-Scientific Culture","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Digital Education and Society","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber College","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03510781408413879,"score_gpt":0.3372863656263324,"score_spread":0.30217855154219364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396780530","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043019233,0.4353757,0.0010473627,0.25754854,0.25190294,0.000070543465,0.00031439855,0.00017342316,0.053136993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067143342,0.34017217,0.0016401503,0.15639997,0.24248996,0.00020522691,0.0005402567,0.00054914196,0.25128886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955882,0.0012643355,0.0002781673,0.00034727505,0.0022872812,0.00023478405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98299026,0.006376945,0.0012657589,0.0006945881,0.006590917,0.002081561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004612205,0.00083874795,0.0015959175,0.004222251,0.0014325011,0.010739433,0.0014587076,0.004650934,0.029090244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021169936,0.0004650492,0.0006243001,0.006105627,0.002503312,0.005528604,0.0017871173,0.0057506636,0.016999312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005579717,0.0000046944315,0.000031534586,0.00028339803,0.000005919881,0.000015038419,0.00002907594,0.00002160353,0.000047243633,0.0021268744,0.983364,0.014065109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004345951,0.000006273783,0.000081974315,0.0003879665,0.0000061974342,0.000048282214,0.000036318095,0.00001291618,0.000019445017,0.0010475714,0.99834466,0.0000040795403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004113985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014992698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004990039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009691441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09731662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406648406","doi":"10.1177/00483931251314866","title":"Reply to Moehler","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06725412280497726,"score_gpt":0.3599288364064658,"score_spread":0.2926747136014885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406648406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000108485576,0.003014875,0.000115398514,0.9773183,0.018506557,0.0000028922477,0.000025563377,0.000016554122,0.00089150737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044442383,0.002288743,0.0002534958,0.96950185,0.018994145,0.000028693146,0.000018474875,0.000065330736,0.004404975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940282,0.0019278347,0.00043460692,0.0014201994,0.0017729417,0.00041618224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97545505,0.015992792,0.0013841266,0.00075063214,0.0048641777,0.001553256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006869865,0.001039368,0.0015764086,0.0015446609,0.004364178,0.005709552,0.0029227133,0.028687758,0.007491972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058513958,0.0007227259,0.0011723506,0.001480069,0.00867809,0.008930439,0.003801331,0.047733538,0.005239115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018229131,0.000004359361,0.00008114832,0.0000460977,0.000008206679,0.00009647784,0.00028070933,0.000021641234,0.0000364602,0.0078814095,0.9891054,0.0024198901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035714642,0.000024624369,0.00035903064,0.00055286154,0.000022547036,0.0005726607,0.0012281975,0.00011815944,0.00036876506,0.021927403,0.9747138,0.000076302706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004156307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034603393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028687758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005535527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004996044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04016328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408727117","doi":"10.1177/00483931251327336","title":"Foresight as Consolation: Kant on the Capability of Future Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; Futures studies; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Theology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08244627859248173,"score_gpt":0.3258579510535721,"score_spread":0.2434116724610904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408727117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05815147,0.0216376,0.14645213,0.11358719,0.0008917678,0.00007002841,0.0001343354,0.0001744927,0.6589009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97500706,0.0038629058,0.0102664875,0.0015651535,0.00023257987,0.000038148803,0.000024463503,0.000049392664,0.008953769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948319,0.0035671087,0.00013495212,0.0003449734,0.00067742553,0.00044360818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422026,0.004069675,0.0003773571,0.0005352411,0.00048520032,0.00031227156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074092573,0.0005334177,0.00027146115,0.0016808329,0.0030318047,0.007717727,0.00068231457,0.0028472631,0.0024532531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008575154,0.0003191534,0.0005692819,0.0014479437,0.039891943,0.015592041,0.005216925,0.0052752676,0.000479573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040898885,0.0000019183333,0.000042643514,0.000011619915,0.0000015898141,0.000023372113,0.0017992645,0.00027335726,0.000021330045,0.99571687,0.0005829503,0.0015210445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029178902,0.00000355394,0.00004790207,0.00004430817,0.0000019707538,0.000024469693,0.000857464,0.000250649,0.0000666633,0.9834963,0.015197274,0.0000064886176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003841215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023889428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007717727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004765167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004397707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03918439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414242482","doi":"10.1177/00483931251380495","title":"Collective Intentionality, Individualism, and the Place of Children in Social Theorizing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social ontology; Centrality; Power (physics); Social relation; Element (criminal law); Social reality; Ontology; Social power; Social analysis","score_opus":0.03777468178755705,"score_gpt":0.34592308331728283,"score_spread":0.3081484015297258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414242482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4747136,0.0090297535,0.05363167,0.07623113,0.00031430856,0.000047619484,0.000053697928,0.000109570625,0.3858686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418044,0.0006030459,0.0032300663,0.0003852272,0.000029122863,0.00001737608,0.0000068191944,0.000019218422,0.001528555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953023,0.0032501456,0.00011623084,0.00041341185,0.0005347644,0.00038310903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940386,0.003907152,0.0006421708,0.00060256786,0.00030004565,0.0005095071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010056655,0.00036920296,0.00044756877,0.0019908869,0.004434506,0.0065656705,0.0011484988,0.0018907387,0.002151639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060319663,0.0002859039,0.0003505599,0.0011338562,0.07830162,0.011103206,0.007642521,0.0047415257,0.00018120097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008125549,0.000015876558,0.0011664911,0.000018578721,0.0000046993496,0.000045831603,0.036192257,0.00014905924,0.00009315078,0.9579907,0.0003212245,0.0039940625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009820969,0.000016795106,0.0011196352,0.00007564125,0.0000073187257,0.00012656886,0.020585537,0.00043736963,0.00023603505,0.9533661,0.024005327,0.000013833786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003698693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043251766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010056655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044760867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002335817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053185344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}