{"meta":{"query_hash":"58629980943f","filters":{"venue":"Pittsburgh Tax Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/58629980943f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Pittsburgh+Tax+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1863228776","doi":"10.5195/taxreview.2015.35","title":"David Foster Wallace on Tax Policy, How to Be an Adult and Other Mysteries of the Universe","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law and economics; Tax credit; Neoclassical economics; Keynesian economics; Public economics","score_opus":0.07767671329039667,"score_gpt":0.2777572128805281,"score_spread":0.20008049959013147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863228776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05854445,0.09962376,0.000028605928,0.5190829,0.0013388087,0.0036039834,0.00064379285,0.00014865375,0.31698504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8009299,0.0015874911,0.000030049247,0.1177711,0.0009831857,0.000061362305,0.000009432226,0.000054079046,0.07857341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912506,0.00013359204,0.00019226805,0.00019625749,0.00019755468,0.00015524155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999126,0.00002738891,0.000097985314,0.00044041785,0.00017944266,0.0001287324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001870847,0.00016788844,0.00031230514,0.00004907676,0.00008703835,0.00012645718,0.00021085946,0.00003067791,0.00015639198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009211831,0.00010190124,0.00008375847,0.00006296161,0.00010755495,0.00025570518,0.000115003124,0.000090236696,0.000008273306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006316803,0.000089899426,0.00009008388,0.001346854,0.000043045362,0.0000108540025,0.06099628,7.3745895e-8,0.000032755608,0.6657872,0.2623296,0.00921016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018787045,0.00019885434,0.00001811071,0.0018090374,0.000041775285,0.0000055358905,0.0018526308,3.9892913e-7,0.000021713835,0.0013796281,0.99434775,0.00013672202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002241249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053091027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74238545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025487529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052278898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4155412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038644411","doi":"10.5195/taxreview.2013.16","title":"ENTRY-LEVEL ENTREPRENEURS AND THE CHOICE-OF-ENTITY CHALLENGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Barriers to entry; Government (linguistics); Equity (law); Value (mathematics); Economics; Public economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04495032256688426,"score_gpt":0.24757803998833242,"score_spread":0.20262771742144814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038644411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15553515,0.60246205,0.0015091045,0.13314797,0.0018229289,0.0077949674,0.000010263423,0.00039283288,0.09732473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83892876,0.1490206,0.000044599943,0.009199169,0.0007212066,0.00023153666,0.000010485142,0.000024232017,0.0018193825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900246,0.000029999701,0.00036503046,0.00022437361,0.00020845194,0.00016966845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988192,0.00008810464,0.00056893844,0.00033579525,0.00017285303,0.000015131899],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040343724,0.00015329887,0.0003482219,0.000047262318,0.00010332935,0.00012167032,0.00023690077,0.000028767503,0.0011832363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042737366,0.000097475866,0.00010884967,0.0002823948,0.00012160099,0.0005893577,0.00017173894,0.00010777099,0.00031181573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026446276,0.00028833366,0.07462839,0.014326149,0.000114481125,0.000003915777,0.00008735325,0.0000029447835,0.0001443495,0.13445023,0.22625628,0.5496711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010437737,0.0000044361163,0.06392814,0.0016417423,0.0001409975,0.0000013633233,0.00002540911,0.00017201227,0.000007936389,0.015879678,0.9169127,0.00024183927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007168273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031084324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69065636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006334433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000091342245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134737698","doi":"10.5195/taxreview.2020.124","title":"Vancouver Empty Home Tax: An Analysis of Taxation as a Solution to a Housing Crunch","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crunch; Economics; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.032398092475949006,"score_gpt":0.33923348932228553,"score_spread":0.30683539684633654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134737698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67811614,0.20927042,0.021446109,0.06745659,0.0025488758,0.0036294279,0.00083541794,0.00025897825,0.016438067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92622197,0.051226705,0.0005889332,0.016344925,0.00047833435,0.00007133037,0.000025616322,0.000022857246,0.005019357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827915,0.0002842363,0.00035894348,0.00030259925,0.00047621716,0.0002988377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861425,0.00005852615,0.00046394265,0.0003573577,0.00026252115,0.00024340875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008046014,0.00010968275,0.00047067096,0.00012722476,0.00022652729,0.000041643663,0.00018273148,0.000067865476,0.00075865147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015240839,0.00011633733,0.00024171197,0.0026511247,0.00006693267,0.00027203752,0.0000345876,0.00007986677,0.000019830055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038267186,0.00044112754,0.016160404,0.0020022157,0.0009881161,0.000096813455,0.019988848,0.00042041743,0.001242176,0.028637508,0.6306606,0.2993235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009216032,0.000030165778,0.028378665,0.0009427646,0.0007500919,7.296372e-7,0.00021154138,0.00004960784,0.000043717206,0.0012545473,0.96800786,0.00023812907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13979064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42929524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3373473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027874668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054631924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8659376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}