{"meta":{"query_hash":"04817e07946d","filters":{"venue":"Planning Theory"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/04817e07946d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Planning+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1976157411","doi":"10.1177/1473095213510430","title":"The Fourth Coase Theorem: State planning rules and spontaneity in action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"New York Institute of Technology","keywords":"Coase theorem; State (computer science); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Law and economics; Zoning; Transaction cost; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.0375494554350072,"score_gpt":0.23605622965980744,"score_spread":0.19850677422480023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976157411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020876337,0.0008913561,0.77946734,0.010010438,0.00028594723,0.00023999345,0.00030786745,0.0003515722,0.18756926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194879,0.00080629316,0.1589821,0.0014401255,0.00024741385,0.00076054403,0.00018806948,0.00022773407,0.017859705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379057,0.001988775,0.00055024785,0.001659136,0.0012262191,0.0007850033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843501,0.010211197,0.00079171977,0.0030271618,0.0012572898,0.00036251565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008564045,0.0007003442,0.001159296,0.0017985582,0.0027820955,0.0055825454,0.002647219,0.004030795,0.011247445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020690009,0.00074873725,0.0025540749,0.0011524239,0.02180647,0.014645766,0.0044445363,0.0054870127,0.0012568304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004963067,0.0000028004797,0.00005881147,0.000011154332,0.00000365858,0.000026317748,0.00017196666,0.0008532698,0.000048805778,0.9970662,0.00029112358,0.0014608867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018611305,0.00001050924,0.000053647163,0.000023288301,0.000006358215,0.000064691514,0.000087554916,0.004780245,0.00034962667,0.9867753,0.007818297,0.000012043034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049918196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011247445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041352934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049254242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045291543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996928120","doi":"10.1177/1473095214530701","title":"Justification, compromise and test: Developing a pragmatic sociology of critique to understand the outcomes of urban redevelopment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Sociology; Governmentality; Epistemology; Situated; Ideology; Compromise; Discourse ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.046303690258836364,"score_gpt":0.3169175434013812,"score_spread":0.2706138531425448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996928120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092204444,0.0062937494,0.29799348,0.10069015,0.0006558534,0.00046490523,0.00006123314,0.0002579583,0.5013783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96719044,0.0005874378,0.02090705,0.0011807688,0.000103151455,0.0002813676,0.0000241153,0.00012583887,0.009599739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590559,0.033918347,0.00057288836,0.0012674025,0.0033754078,0.0018099515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562594,0.033640288,0.002041235,0.00327011,0.0037462728,0.0010427438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038148362,0.0010917858,0.0011753417,0.0053379843,0.014722402,0.019622779,0.003719024,0.0100207245,0.0028784194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052234504,0.0006163656,0.00088740274,0.0038530217,0.12938593,0.021136496,0.010655954,0.008237041,0.00048001183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007461293,0.000009290717,0.00015559979,0.000033778982,0.000004155466,0.000096326796,0.038513683,0.00048434097,0.000066002394,0.95540196,0.00079114013,0.004436163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016534314,0.000014654557,0.0001775275,0.00013382931,0.00000672758,0.000073967785,0.025704445,0.0017796765,0.00020781312,0.9364631,0.035399064,0.000022609449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024565773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02152217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038148362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027475853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018866818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20175022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011627423","doi":"10.1177/1473095205054603","title":"Rawls’s ‘Justice as Fairness’: A Moral Basis for Contemporary Planning Theory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Reflective equilibrium; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Normative; Law and economics; Classical liberalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Foundationalism; Politics; Public reason; Context (archaeology); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06905073781264442,"score_gpt":0.3407643549164012,"score_spread":0.2717136171037568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011627423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110865915,0.015188254,0.2043348,0.23919521,0.002072665,0.00018758986,0.00017219895,0.00011800022,0.5276447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82273465,0.0113782985,0.08084003,0.033459425,0.0031988283,0.00067109655,0.0001427018,0.00021564269,0.04735944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882124,0.006920754,0.0003955164,0.0010835807,0.0026576808,0.0007301774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940544,0.0040843682,0.00032811344,0.00047640986,0.00077915686,0.00027759708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011789648,0.0006609814,0.0008541527,0.002524453,0.0061666737,0.008658282,0.0019442654,0.0063263434,0.0046122856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188702,0.0004599287,0.0010397705,0.002592842,0.049303427,0.010775485,0.0042328336,0.00933934,0.00078576995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011124833,0.0000029831995,0.000014001009,0.000008630066,9.589099e-7,0.000005666373,0.00027784664,0.00017673237,0.0000051666575,0.99714977,0.0012850793,0.0010720234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031468744,0.000002675847,0.000022366083,0.000024914765,0.000001072483,0.0000069492567,0.00011267151,0.00024280687,0.000015936828,0.9812196,0.018344143,0.0000037241803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064857095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055260644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011789648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009444646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075888718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06852597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012583327","doi":"10.1177/1473095212441697","title":"“Never eat anything with a face”: Ontology and ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Function (biology); Identity (music); Salient; Metaphysics; Computer science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.30096687025032426,"score_gpt":0.5443898553757062,"score_spread":0.2434229851253819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012583327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107289836,0.030530304,0.09402435,0.31101632,0.0009070936,0.00014089406,0.000107367734,0.00007374028,0.45591015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565282,0.0047930256,0.015220624,0.009294833,0.00021520915,0.00017728133,0.000031929587,0.000058840127,0.013680107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867597,0.0111971265,0.00021752117,0.00046940838,0.00093342934,0.00042289362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184555,0.0064014415,0.0004533044,0.000395143,0.0004932387,0.0004112667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009867712,0.0003420631,0.00042476616,0.0015724158,0.008393512,0.007239372,0.0010331878,0.0038040748,0.0017175515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069133122,0.0003333258,0.00038008668,0.0017625316,0.09936411,0.010206993,0.0040533543,0.00427403,0.0002742909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040849313,0.000008481192,0.00017548876,0.000024894609,0.0000021282372,0.00004401619,0.021330398,0.000108679305,0.000039014816,0.9729993,0.0021261275,0.0031374951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006210705,0.000009231095,0.00030072016,0.00017492156,0.0000025559784,0.00008373649,0.020042926,0.0003672214,0.00013343041,0.9125818,0.06628433,0.000012865335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014001132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012524364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014001132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010070245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007072269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0730651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046789948","doi":"10.1177/1473095213513256","title":"On the future of urban design: Fabricating the future through Bloch’s utopians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Relevance (law); Power (physics); Democracy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Globalization; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.026205259979102946,"score_gpt":0.2776408671115227,"score_spread":0.25143560713241975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046789948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05049094,0.013774898,0.12563922,0.040584974,0.0005332173,0.00009483301,0.000052521613,0.00018282418,0.7686466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93727756,0.004279558,0.025817955,0.00216815,0.00014640394,0.00018140837,0.000024022105,0.00012002419,0.029984856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563795,0.0032432254,0.000060116232,0.00028800283,0.00041372425,0.0003568717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854386,0.00084301835,0.000093733666,0.00026711915,0.00013279126,0.00011951345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050168587,0.000588815,0.00046634435,0.0016198532,0.006366562,0.007228886,0.0007838416,0.0019201081,0.004456153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033068608,0.0002929871,0.0005006314,0.0012595508,0.05060493,0.008460319,0.0063089128,0.003276256,0.00064466055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067306896,0.0000034498287,0.000052270927,0.000018731662,0.0000014043911,0.000016784614,0.004907897,0.00041270343,0.000047963116,0.98970664,0.00087334,0.0039521544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075274725,0.000017482731,0.00014058282,0.000119250915,0.0000033414362,0.00004681924,0.003287953,0.0006848929,0.00018143338,0.9055313,0.08996776,0.00001173434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004044519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066302726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007228886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006104739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037782947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044293165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086319168","doi":"10.1177/1473095204044777","title":"Where is Feminism in Planning Going? Appropriation or Transformation?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Feminism; Sociology; Postmodernism; Gender studies; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020677319352961052,"score_gpt":0.2521511743383979,"score_spread":0.23147385498543685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086319168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023494473,0.020960037,0.027367435,0.39711112,0.0014298079,0.00003505531,0.00006821062,0.00009833042,0.5294356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416055,0.012549214,0.005881681,0.01129699,0.0010409871,0.00008806205,0.000048998027,0.00016138483,0.027327264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904377,0.007039404,0.00015582363,0.0004986798,0.0009760688,0.00089228724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873018,0.00994475,0.0005900459,0.0011045592,0.00048293686,0.00057600526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011393133,0.00040482305,0.00050818024,0.0014171778,0.006703793,0.013915302,0.0016495035,0.0026999896,0.0086115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012201901,0.00034337642,0.00038854268,0.0030005847,0.06658688,0.017267384,0.0067917104,0.0052115996,0.0007890185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007914571,0.000011205413,0.0004187902,0.00008183172,0.0000033093113,0.000055275512,0.036404546,0.00014993134,0.000041939973,0.9267004,0.004828836,0.031296104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005378155,0.00001325239,0.0005079761,0.00051326404,0.0000040806203,0.00011679874,0.06399894,0.00018448223,0.00021470859,0.6348513,0.29957822,0.000011651731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011147114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012597433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013915302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009555725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00960354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110633482","doi":"10.1177/1473095212441696","title":"Being and becoming: Writing children into planning theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Redress; Sociology; Neglect; Habitus; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016505831722132564,"score_gpt":0.2467428789065607,"score_spread":0.2302370471844281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110633482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071297444,0.042880885,0.099316455,0.103512175,0.0023013295,0.00013543038,0.00026003833,0.00016092973,0.6801353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93061066,0.020713722,0.018370433,0.004858039,0.0007421246,0.00019501382,0.00011945231,0.00014577738,0.024244875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767023,0.001687324,0.00007071329,0.00022374716,0.00018715272,0.00016066138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943025,0.0049467413,0.00026379136,0.0001753135,0.00013789152,0.00017373865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048463386,0.0005970201,0.00042503816,0.0014834886,0.004247103,0.0063158213,0.0012819751,0.00261898,0.0054407977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004931202,0.00033095884,0.00030226857,0.001826794,0.035711065,0.01343269,0.0036560665,0.0070609665,0.00055118103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030758154,0.000006858881,0.00018563069,0.00003719993,0.000001183986,0.00010190229,0.04265293,0.00018048847,0.000033285593,0.9497706,0.002186669,0.0048401947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008246469,0.000021604606,0.0003944374,0.0004434307,0.000004867603,0.00029010343,0.050707784,0.0005531676,0.00021610057,0.66303504,0.28430873,0.00001651988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005577539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005859694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063158213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005932312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033951115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043042183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154789417","doi":"10.1177/1473095204044778","title":"The Desire Called Civil Society: A Contribution to the Critique of a Bourgeois Category","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Bourgeoisie; Hegelianism; Democratization; Capitalism; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017886309264215524,"score_gpt":0.30916639100064974,"score_spread":0.2912800817364342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154789417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03746662,0.024741106,0.04855726,0.19161102,0.0017853595,0.000032013253,0.000060745442,0.00009108158,0.6956548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660461,0.004855134,0.0051012654,0.0056384793,0.0012989561,0.00006214509,0.000017909804,0.00009575304,0.016884333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947373,0.0039656917,0.00006888411,0.00036412216,0.0005244702,0.00033950276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432474,0.004460403,0.00022942678,0.00036129955,0.00033439582,0.0002896793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005582651,0.0006278747,0.00049840834,0.0025869308,0.0065297494,0.0085911285,0.0012913285,0.0045470633,0.004193611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052376213,0.00024411338,0.0005504516,0.00221515,0.06319108,0.0076744477,0.0040180334,0.0059746974,0.00055524014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018632527,0.0000017891713,0.00001575269,0.00000560219,5.907915e-7,0.0000078215335,0.0014803818,0.000054735512,0.0000053072904,0.99706227,0.00071845896,0.00064549665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037898258,0.000003602316,0.000037469395,0.00002968588,0.0000013258539,0.000016286529,0.0013449541,0.00019943611,0.000026983638,0.9594244,0.03890884,0.0000034427997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043995404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085911285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073000547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004557617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05296582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158823931","doi":"10.1177/1473095211427285","title":"Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Mediation; Indigenous rights; Reading (process); Democracy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.09803857321276536,"score_gpt":0.31494256708969204,"score_spread":0.21690399387692666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158823931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62305844,0.002396514,0.033185743,0.022153834,0.0001277303,0.00015094521,0.00010453925,0.0001263988,0.3186958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969785,0.00020331104,0.0009228526,0.00008939618,0.000008796385,0.0000349602,0.000013446929,0.000017420116,0.0017313283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370956,0.004818706,0.00013711816,0.00033817062,0.000512197,0.00048420014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98730034,0.010749024,0.00068854523,0.0006190005,0.00037602457,0.00026708303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065766308,0.00036844137,0.0005002341,0.0022393079,0.012423499,0.011267641,0.0019046295,0.0022878698,0.0052429256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012661622,0.00040477523,0.00028537613,0.0036139626,0.051702764,0.013039451,0.008168501,0.0029198327,0.00024188087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008168359,0.000008064207,0.0007162953,0.00005469642,0.0000036086144,0.00034726417,0.83295506,0.00016028638,0.0001824656,0.16190854,0.0002197656,0.0034358243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008408401,0.0000127703215,0.0015838626,0.00021811845,0.000012516956,0.00020590471,0.8784339,0.0007361112,0.0003625534,0.080989875,0.037414867,0.000021027472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07104835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07040123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07104835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01190408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008398407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14126962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164632707","doi":"10.1177/1473095215596546","title":"Creation of property rights in planning by contract and edict: Beyond “Coasian bargaining” in private planning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Property rights; Commons; Law and economics; Externality; Negotiation; Economics; Government (linguistics); Proposition; Business; Transaction cost; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030832272797376895,"score_gpt":0.24375934913478678,"score_spread":0.21292707633740987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164632707","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03687607,0.0024327808,0.47594902,0.017603371,0.00032399918,0.00014611504,0.000037299524,0.000047289494,0.4665841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94031286,0.001561538,0.03678418,0.0007487384,0.0001709991,0.00016737008,0.000021811975,0.00003753702,0.020195084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929972,0.004266622,0.00020554762,0.00046875473,0.0012898017,0.00077209447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994408,0.0035733024,0.0005050944,0.0008346307,0.00031864416,0.00036031846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009504706,0.00042756624,0.0006569095,0.00091070886,0.003750632,0.0068625133,0.0017306999,0.0034333563,0.007130453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009739015,0.00043852752,0.0009839807,0.0015536996,0.030828908,0.011885771,0.0070169005,0.0052558687,0.00049465155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029611608,0.000005255923,0.000037265756,0.0000063280927,0.000001068915,0.000023287734,0.0001816206,0.0011150292,0.000015159082,0.99665326,0.00012536622,0.0018334324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009813314,0.000009240408,0.00006471348,0.00004196454,0.0000021150242,0.000028037522,0.00025736398,0.003471375,0.00009183467,0.9845436,0.011471302,0.000008607235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005455897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005884485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009504706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059142024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053151916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050266266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171690259","doi":"10.1177/147309520323004","title":"The Future of Planning at the ‘ End of History ’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Global History, Politics, and Ideology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Hegemony; End of history; Ideology; Capitalism; Democracy; Politics; Reading (process); Sociology; Political economy; State (computer science); Political science; Neoclassical economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.021488337115466914,"score_gpt":0.2748502553127302,"score_spread":0.2533619181972633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171690259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004285891,0.03320925,0.019697623,0.06249396,0.0011760041,0.000027278295,0.000056400782,0.00009251505,0.878961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6339308,0.049281795,0.018186329,0.01049646,0.0016965568,0.0002277251,0.00020037097,0.00022112053,0.28575885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892706,0.00063437887,0.00001811297,0.00009057376,0.00020396849,0.00012586894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880695,0.0007479593,0.000048235062,0.00015251145,0.00011663911,0.00012765556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017530224,0.00042705968,0.00028984537,0.0009032428,0.0028198562,0.0072887978,0.00079053274,0.0015478352,0.008386788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023359403,0.00023805798,0.00027392816,0.0017859602,0.01766273,0.00940188,0.0021326249,0.0042366497,0.0012848305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004117845,0.0000037144628,0.000040606385,0.000025823225,0.0000016407487,0.000017580696,0.0017729899,0.0002733399,0.000018511379,0.9707285,0.010526556,0.016586527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025749832,0.0000059907966,0.00008340913,0.00011841946,0.0000017267812,0.000019602381,0.0013494096,0.0002244814,0.000037244183,0.6868015,0.3113523,0.0000033987703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067546116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010537827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008386788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006240413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008992909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045277596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329434651","doi":"10.1177/1473095214521585","title":"City and soul in divided societies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025251699397342182,"score_gpt":0.29611525251674964,"score_spread":0.27086355311940746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329434651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46176544,0.0042008376,0.02265414,0.0120683275,0.00017337374,0.000029963452,0.00011340131,0.00003556094,0.49895898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936847,0.00033775784,0.0006904267,0.0000993045,0.000027517177,0.000014955823,0.000015767373,0.000006154163,0.0051233293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00041796055,0.000017323187,0.000108124244,0.000070746275,0.00015678469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998801,0.00063969626,0.00014122836,0.00013258513,0.00009278496,0.00019270206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009169744,0.00021880024,0.000475769,0.0015617842,0.0042169173,0.0065049287,0.0006003386,0.0012398348,0.0072232997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020261875,0.00023488622,0.00030737594,0.002890003,0.022232797,0.005559318,0.003997604,0.001094935,0.00027149194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054178004,0.0000034685831,0.00029220877,0.000005784184,0.0000024053131,0.00001185029,0.0016028298,0.00031675043,0.000009798084,0.99632335,0.00021463007,0.0012115381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067881465,0.0000045945753,0.0006075639,0.00001326899,0.000006620366,0.000014231259,0.0045123864,0.0006707886,0.000022479693,0.9887861,0.0053516715,0.0000035052594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009324767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013815029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009324767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029880975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015847989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024164379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339760368","doi":"10.1177/1473095209357870","title":"Reflexivity and post-colonial critique: Toward an ethics of accountability in planning praxis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Reflexivity; Sociology; Praxis; Agency (philosophy); Normative; Technocracy; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06376662165482161,"score_gpt":0.4238473006551172,"score_spread":0.3600806790002956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339760368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061895475,0.009473675,0.19510461,0.23519495,0.0010698169,0.00017125878,0.000044719363,0.0003675415,0.496678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763906,0.0010981669,0.009131471,0.0031064237,0.00019787534,0.00012958086,0.000009168101,0.00011847575,0.009818305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9628493,0.029828096,0.0006606602,0.001827137,0.0033682908,0.0014665219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721842,0.020967377,0.0019675775,0.002343294,0.0017179012,0.0008197126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025953531,0.0007069377,0.0005390371,0.0018359264,0.007428074,0.013132638,0.0023657626,0.0046633915,0.0021101446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029458651,0.00043976077,0.000502201,0.0020914974,0.11826394,0.012688141,0.009860088,0.010238696,0.00034970403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004499557,0.0000056761705,0.00010058279,0.000026245296,0.0000025785562,0.000050862844,0.033761892,0.000267289,0.000040731193,0.9614866,0.0010532791,0.0031996316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013143145,0.0000121765615,0.00018761794,0.0001697959,0.000003811655,0.00006784879,0.013505794,0.00075755286,0.00029719164,0.89676577,0.08820276,0.000016488404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009246951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065810154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025953531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012331313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013819207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13725704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341784539","doi":"10.1177/1473095215625707","title":"On embracing an immanent ethics in urban planning: Pursuing our Body-without-Organs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Politics; Sociology; Urban planning; State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Environmental design and planning; Epistemology; Agonism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Land-use planning","score_opus":0.05339164812834773,"score_gpt":0.3580654656941298,"score_spread":0.30467381756578205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341784539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050160076,0.010682319,0.13324742,0.34698617,0.0012264666,0.00012504186,0.00003133278,0.00009260112,0.45744854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94158787,0.005358312,0.024117567,0.012547608,0.00040042153,0.00019039704,0.000019508001,0.00008458499,0.015693743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908495,0.0068773753,0.0001240512,0.0004572838,0.0010238355,0.0006679609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945909,0.0034316343,0.000406846,0.0005810014,0.0004241145,0.00056562916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014299727,0.00054979825,0.0006261873,0.0012424754,0.009316846,0.012147313,0.0019537339,0.0051123225,0.0030506195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068393485,0.00031522225,0.0005966864,0.0013306565,0.115808,0.012907405,0.010751842,0.008355731,0.00056595524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002342107,0.000005287905,0.0000839367,0.000014671896,0.00000128683,0.000033634275,0.004889093,0.00019011657,0.000021586517,0.99149996,0.00067412533,0.0025839165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003949139,0.000013052778,0.000105576524,0.00009911207,0.00000242049,0.000038897855,0.0068262713,0.0003204504,0.00009156757,0.9516857,0.04080381,0.000009191671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053061265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009794174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014299727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059338277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077509773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07562506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803322151","doi":"10.1177/1473095218776042","title":"The moral limits of autonomous democracy for planning theory: A critique of Purcell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Control (management); Law and economics; Power (physics); Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.09036046414335812,"score_gpt":0.3871233260105381,"score_spread":0.29676286186718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803322151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018941568,0.011810507,0.09184323,0.51359797,0.0010016225,0.000074154006,0.00007212026,0.00013854848,0.36252037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92338264,0.0037016775,0.017389301,0.04014679,0.00103147,0.0004158077,0.000027779091,0.00015994548,0.013744568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858293,0.009423885,0.00023775536,0.0011584936,0.0027183061,0.0006322554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843642,0.012296369,0.0006578314,0.0010734957,0.0011113909,0.00049672014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012990779,0.00055264164,0.0010055227,0.0015087998,0.00668697,0.009611948,0.0032798452,0.008222099,0.0034145392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01678564,0.00046363834,0.00092827866,0.00143638,0.06598025,0.009604281,0.006006573,0.015500249,0.0007059318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024426338,0.0000035979458,0.000025042356,0.000011796423,0.0000018254591,0.00001183837,0.0006143188,0.0002865424,0.000007865249,0.9961577,0.0018053907,0.0010717129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007021451,0.0000035080764,0.00003218675,0.000038282793,0.0000018054345,0.000012440485,0.00029174902,0.0005413559,0.000049896327,0.9789094,0.020106165,0.000006137672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00759696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005278847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012990779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009203233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069853878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06870258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811113396","doi":"10.1177/1473095218763842","title":"Unsettling planning theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Theme (computing); Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03680984163163689,"score_gpt":0.3355455312333015,"score_spread":0.29873568960166463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811113396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03128832,0.01571394,0.12741819,0.23803852,0.0016815183,0.00011016539,0.00013908345,0.00019691541,0.5854134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95393175,0.0052059707,0.014225114,0.008055568,0.0004943411,0.000177938,0.00007083767,0.00013760582,0.017700857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989509,0.0068551796,0.00021561515,0.0013457538,0.0013897448,0.00068469637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911089,0.006353212,0.00039108781,0.0011012739,0.0005961399,0.0004493403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011656604,0.0005748905,0.00065479486,0.0017478865,0.008154485,0.0120554315,0.0025707763,0.0037204765,0.0065591116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012208213,0.00048725458,0.0008074474,0.0020804328,0.08980018,0.016563138,0.008135002,0.009128027,0.00080882735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017027172,0.000003053903,0.000051573115,0.000021282616,0.000001355606,0.000021177073,0.0025556097,0.00030278292,0.000009233349,0.99356914,0.001253185,0.0022098436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003043999,0.0000045900415,0.000060594422,0.00009414845,0.0000015375036,0.000025781008,0.003138059,0.0005877751,0.00003190268,0.9564569,0.03959059,0.0000051372167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062800837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007084307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120554315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011961323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009674067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08678591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897254329","doi":"10.1177/1473095218806929","title":"Pathways to legitimacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Deliberation; Public administration; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0473348383505151,"score_gpt":0.32826756870335005,"score_spread":0.28093273035283495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897254329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06998325,0.0014975216,0.11082064,0.043047734,0.00029231893,0.0004291355,0.00035795823,0.00041276056,0.7731586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692826,0.0007589054,0.014420529,0.00084886403,0.00013194101,0.00035542305,0.0001826722,0.00014460017,0.013874344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820141,0.006403819,0.000857175,0.0028243456,0.0053704698,0.0025301343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607098,0.021077843,0.0030779906,0.0052494598,0.0063242004,0.0035606753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014742162,0.0008158537,0.00080193684,0.0059662247,0.008509678,0.022157228,0.0022539846,0.004848632,0.025757048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054295216,0.0009771046,0.000853732,0.0039059548,0.050978076,0.024788901,0.023534253,0.008268149,0.0022698778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009938805,0.000020977937,0.0008364164,0.000026868245,0.000004470015,0.00007936526,0.002549969,0.00021852719,0.00006054287,0.98935145,0.00076430326,0.006077151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021348102,0.000020160902,0.0008590926,0.00010503766,0.00000569994,0.000083912644,0.0024202396,0.00055725285,0.00017584341,0.96726125,0.028473742,0.000016432361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004400115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040141465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025757048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011714045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020744968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086165905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036799252","doi":"10.1177/1473095220930766","title":"Our curious silence about kindness in planning: Challenges of addressing vulnerability and suffering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Compassion; Vulnerability (computing); Humiliation; Shame; Psychology; Pity; Social psychology; Harm; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Silence; Empathy; Acquiescence; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20820945121994386,"score_gpt":0.4169421256913569,"score_spread":0.20873267447141305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036799252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13796373,0.009148096,0.0872682,0.48022166,0.0013910184,0.000110718036,0.00006272642,0.00022521606,0.2836087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766476,0.001624029,0.007354987,0.007639516,0.00013715329,0.00005606874,0.000009361247,0.0000870373,0.006444254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114835,0.0064721154,0.0001445549,0.00045438803,0.0009838238,0.0007967666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869739,0.008814381,0.00079823396,0.0011442082,0.0011444369,0.0011248623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012887243,0.0005211979,0.00045122998,0.0010452723,0.018247826,0.008248755,0.0025016216,0.003949843,0.0030042701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015512114,0.00034704263,0.0005215453,0.001174872,0.104556404,0.009218956,0.008662401,0.009266411,0.00026192973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011371688,0.0000093325225,0.0004929716,0.00006138642,0.0000071183517,0.0002681842,0.15528914,0.00045060582,0.00015289492,0.8249363,0.0061339196,0.012186739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007166553,0.000019402301,0.0007529354,0.0002926171,0.000013067907,0.00041496727,0.14483851,0.0008688939,0.00047881703,0.7085308,0.14373556,0.00004715233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07836797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10044068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07836797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013670794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014222739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15582365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111234860","doi":"10.1177/1473095220980499","title":"Creative or instrumental planners? Agency and structure in their institutional and political economy context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Structure and agency; Context (archaeology); Structuration theory; Politics; Realm; Sociology; Institutional theory; Function (biology); Public relations; Order (exchange); Control (management); Economic system; Political science; Economics; Management; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03304902464451757,"score_gpt":0.27882969670493857,"score_spread":0.245780672060421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111234860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33406258,0.0035868862,0.07787476,0.05857417,0.00020034073,0.00024291678,0.00012562134,0.0001554958,0.5251772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268204,0.0003438117,0.0023716507,0.00021485733,0.000018962202,0.00003503966,0.000014919131,0.000013652611,0.0043050773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532205,0.0027473948,0.00011331172,0.00060200895,0.00051585084,0.000699317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963566,0.0017887723,0.00051133876,0.00044311298,0.00019650308,0.00070377643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004674178,0.00025990207,0.00031421141,0.0014449223,0.0038016073,0.01031671,0.0010978439,0.0015766151,0.0069229533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008095733,0.00039450452,0.0003120203,0.0017731517,0.035090946,0.008258985,0.0051832646,0.0022106217,0.0003621049],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117562195,0.000016365208,0.0018776562,0.00002801142,0.000006336225,0.00009927587,0.010413239,0.00083242566,0.00007365878,0.9781919,0.0007247215,0.007724733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030494568,0.000034724213,0.0045718397,0.00013237762,0.000015169015,0.00011544321,0.03140054,0.0036447535,0.00023505,0.88560516,0.07418887,0.000025553922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009196934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013134541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01031671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008267996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075091026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059988797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281706744","doi":"10.1177/14730952221107148","title":"Between virtue and profession: Theorising the rise of professionalised public participation practitioners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public participation; Sociology; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Equity (law); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Competence (human resources); Public administration; Political science; Law; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05435843288941122,"score_gpt":0.3622670939148243,"score_spread":0.3079086610254131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281706744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22910935,0.0037005614,0.076038554,0.12417797,0.0005773732,0.00016775203,0.000020729934,0.00009494599,0.56611276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038154,0.0005423608,0.0038021505,0.001266627,0.000099426514,0.000072011586,0.000005814757,0.000018084755,0.0038120279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345596,0.012755162,0.00019235563,0.00089224445,0.0014548672,0.0012493738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96927726,0.022399792,0.0016500314,0.0016381545,0.0018103679,0.0032244336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02194801,0.00031597537,0.00045093521,0.003037991,0.012301557,0.012192978,0.0022227543,0.0067956676,0.003921799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020932222,0.0005725695,0.00053067185,0.0018035175,0.1098697,0.014889099,0.01391143,0.007514257,0.0005367443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007042148,0.00003083917,0.0010161652,0.000029268696,0.0000015701487,0.0001447702,0.09474878,0.00017964217,0.000048557562,0.8992829,0.00066893705,0.0038415068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020747866,0.00003072351,0.00082813937,0.00020426678,0.000004230859,0.00021964192,0.07536463,0.001892237,0.00007269575,0.8756014,0.045744725,0.000016614795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051611825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057132673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02194801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009334096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011480437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11607355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294756112","doi":"10.1177/14730952221124824","title":"‘ <b>¡</b> Eso no se dice’!: Exploring the value of communication distortions in participatory planning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Public relations; Citizen journalism; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13832946421820308,"score_gpt":0.35019600900038095,"score_spread":0.21186654478217787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294756112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35795447,0.008484453,0.05052941,0.17634866,0.0006897451,0.00053361367,0.00022590533,0.00010578814,0.40512797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857115,0.0012056606,0.0048458115,0.0032316146,0.00006397078,0.00024985097,0.000030800486,0.0000879054,0.0045729717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94018406,0.052980807,0.0003872458,0.0012815361,0.003502913,0.0016634774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87931657,0.105250664,0.005057099,0.0045377887,0.0047760666,0.0010618366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047916744,0.00076313486,0.0007015831,0.0017065273,0.015032246,0.020934861,0.0043197097,0.0054565985,0.008268086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078562364,0.0008195349,0.00066862494,0.0034341428,0.073706344,0.033442043,0.01456582,0.009351383,0.0008882149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093220726,0.00005399407,0.0025330468,0.0002481833,0.000021781525,0.00044075088,0.38527176,0.0007875261,0.0001091168,0.59220874,0.0039205314,0.014311419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089476045,0.00008158456,0.0019962408,0.0012805973,0.00005832104,0.0003971231,0.50815046,0.0027265283,0.00063340255,0.39278105,0.09174259,0.000062617626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01958426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019165892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047916744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018671878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113011785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.253411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295934","doi":"10.1177/14730952231166567","title":"Heating up the sauna: Analogue model unraveling the creativity of public participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Creativity; Politics; Sociology; Social movement; Political science; Public relations; Participatory planning; Epistemology; Public administration; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07337198013995407,"score_gpt":0.29779308683657985,"score_spread":0.2244211066966258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20735532,0.00069251435,0.35485289,0.011035303,0.00039549562,0.00019619142,0.00020144266,0.00023706496,0.42503372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969163,0.00017027628,0.019633487,0.00014325744,0.000053112828,0.00010613731,0.000023930996,0.000035469115,0.010671396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864,0.000834176,0.000025853744,0.00019306425,0.00014465526,0.00016229849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773186,0.001235223,0.0001828853,0.00040078996,0.00013857443,0.00031067498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015879279,0.00038354108,0.0004491193,0.0006786518,0.0017197955,0.0047220653,0.0015350977,0.002110731,0.012792416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003715836,0.00029469404,0.0010779948,0.00075500406,0.006901805,0.0037599942,0.003416271,0.0018140321,0.0007688771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028565351,0.000031235868,0.0003707145,0.000032138676,0.000007323362,0.00015167145,0.0014851711,0.016213823,0.00032936406,0.9783034,0.00050156325,0.002544984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005576146,0.00004236533,0.00040553385,0.000031591306,0.000014176904,0.000104616476,0.0011092679,0.16935655,0.00014472086,0.82029194,0.008421304,0.000022194152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003768495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027888028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012792416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001805291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013521281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042794883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396243397","doi":"10.1177/14730952241249799","title":"The online conversion framework: Understanding antagonism, planning theory, and social media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Land Economics Foundation","keywords":"Framing (construction); Agonism; Antagonism; Citizen journalism; Participatory planning; Sociology; Social media; Public participation; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Environmental planning; Geography","score_opus":0.06588109831427415,"score_gpt":0.3361285481694296,"score_spread":0.2702474498551555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396243397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037197944,0.002883056,0.24051179,0.025029013,0.00032037287,0.00028833738,0.00012302464,0.00011712891,0.69352937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421026,0.0012355645,0.036981832,0.0010450348,0.00013045166,0.00060398923,0.00007715513,0.00006422975,0.017759025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945574,0.003897135,0.00011236819,0.00038705574,0.0006375533,0.00040852898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621457,0.002571434,0.0003113516,0.0003272772,0.00021850131,0.00035685778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00610642,0.00089990627,0.0005592939,0.0032925585,0.007421488,0.01024206,0.0025402943,0.0026043665,0.010164542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040314286,0.0003618861,0.0007761429,0.003257442,0.044452384,0.013737566,0.007647415,0.003655162,0.0005278468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031997351,0.000013419278,0.0001506328,0.000021285976,0.000001935239,0.00005519951,0.0034046879,0.0004816578,0.000028632407,0.99228466,0.00033896844,0.0032156687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011121479,0.00001962817,0.00027186683,0.00012300516,0.0000051204997,0.000098234595,0.013850921,0.0022966247,0.00014887145,0.93796664,0.04519644,0.000011384794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064555183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068643885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01024206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076748244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006093417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055685043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402316472","doi":"10.1177/14730952241276686","title":"Perspectives on cities of the global south","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.034426482653391766,"score_gpt":0.3086575618214504,"score_spread":0.2742310791680586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402316472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12425911,0.033697296,0.0068618422,0.31775975,0.0019767892,0.000037510148,0.00018155345,0.00008825766,0.5151379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652065,0.011498847,0.0011135758,0.009442277,0.00047396746,0.00006137805,0.000075877484,0.000082688406,0.012044824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682105,0.001976137,0.00007866896,0.00034205613,0.00033728383,0.00044488529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974004,0.0015947251,0.00022552189,0.00017171256,0.0002838975,0.00032373326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036037008,0.00069521426,0.00062339066,0.0026823399,0.01316631,0.013045178,0.0013165076,0.0034328096,0.0059171687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030544708,0.0002928754,0.000570204,0.0043716123,0.040430285,0.009401224,0.011217989,0.007394774,0.0004275283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084625735,0.000004331362,0.00038188708,0.00010143343,0.0000030746078,0.00016870693,0.08203612,0.00029722412,0.00007596288,0.9087581,0.004672098,0.0034926084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007072476,0.000016847289,0.0011659941,0.00058389123,0.000008550804,0.000239297,0.24817014,0.0003959519,0.00017499347,0.21238558,0.5368231,0.000028595221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022185594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03453059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022185594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015002813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007625041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10885358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412364991","doi":"10.1177/14730952251359052","title":"Rethinking planning in post-colonial cities: Institutional hybridity, power, and conflict","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Colonialism; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.0399367395142227,"score_gpt":0.3173533404726132,"score_spread":0.2774166009583905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412364991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6818329,0.0017287795,0.054523844,0.021861605,0.0001112821,0.00015654412,0.000045899185,0.000102031954,0.23963712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621034,0.00013267362,0.0018644237,0.00010009059,0.0000046643427,0.000023201565,0.000006081234,0.000018429546,0.0016400865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528694,0.0030966536,0.00009500272,0.0004143332,0.0003417338,0.0007652821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543047,0.0025753872,0.00061544805,0.0006714065,0.00022935029,0.00047802395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006426921,0.00033363068,0.0003061056,0.0011464778,0.009754787,0.010598638,0.001929045,0.0012360469,0.0029860737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063654277,0.00047408385,0.00028275614,0.002363207,0.07022361,0.006247653,0.011264762,0.002917715,0.0001664795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024119363,0.000023431214,0.003915816,0.0000713253,0.000012329426,0.0006932542,0.14426373,0.0038290538,0.00026754732,0.8262038,0.0010246272,0.019670835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025149873,0.000043752163,0.006237344,0.00024485987,0.000017755292,0.00028898288,0.32210237,0.005370621,0.0006021947,0.5447227,0.120300956,0.000043319822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025390377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064605564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025390377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0157256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010349923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114097714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}