{"meta":{"query_hash":"04817e07946d","filters":{"venue":"Planning Theory"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/04817e07946d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Planning+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1976157411","doi":"10.1177/1473095213510430","title":"The Fourth Coase Theorem: State planning rules and spontaneity in action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"New York Institute of Technology","keywords":"Coase theorem; State (computer science); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Law and economics; Zoning; Transaction cost; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.0375494554350072,"score_gpt":0.23605622965980744,"score_spread":0.19850677422480023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976157411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96492815,0.00235345,0.0011300101,0.00019256477,0.0005623694,0.00026399086,0.000041413638,0.00004783251,0.030480206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.000195439,0.00007059971,0.00015989167,0.00015478328,0.00003974003,0.000009683276,0.000024611163,0.00056090124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998686,0.000086992986,0.0005283454,0.0003129957,0.000026199597,0.0003594393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879783,0.00055155234,0.00031674106,0.00023899906,0.00001365408,0.000081198355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020394272,0.00013540733,0.000317265,0.00012572597,0.00029026397,0.00022927509,0.00019013202,0.00008096442,0.000079996156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018428045,0.00013933831,0.000047700843,0.00006474777,0.0001848436,0.000331178,0.00006294371,0.00019846874,0.00036292733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000146512,0.00002854837,0.24204177,0.000026785629,0.000057789883,0.000018267106,0.0039565293,0.00051571266,0.000019460042,0.74788946,0.0006819121,0.0046172435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043348392,0.000035926816,0.12816694,0.000052763902,0.0000029616563,0.000016216523,0.0011446193,0.0029229054,0.000021473385,0.8603787,0.006580703,0.000243336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009677959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008540187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11387482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085305976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012679347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5682051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996928120","doi":"10.1177/1473095214530701","title":"Justification, compromise and test: Developing a pragmatic sociology of critique to understand the outcomes of urban redevelopment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Redevelopment; Sociology; Governmentality; Epistemology; Situated; Ideology; Compromise; Discourse ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.046303690258836364,"score_gpt":0.3169175434013812,"score_spread":0.2706138531425448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996928120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301185,0.0022085859,0.023082692,0.013886079,0.00035163187,0.00071367976,0.000011376939,0.00007457334,0.029552903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972499,0.000028755909,0.0018320871,0.00035028902,0.000032969685,0.000011219865,0.0000011130138,0.000004261456,0.0004894071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909836,0.00030727542,0.00021000196,0.0001055392,0.00013369446,0.0001451493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635595,0.003332795,0.00011282991,0.00008054781,0.00008290201,0.000034964236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018433568,0.00006836379,0.00020395865,0.00003510949,0.00041934056,0.000010454606,0.00014793476,0.00004934373,0.000009253535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036883275,0.000049812348,0.000021383077,0.000086888766,0.00088124495,0.00002619696,0.000045568522,0.000057986832,0.0000011167535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005810576,0.000011729135,0.01665212,0.00002525529,0.000035626494,1.290979e-7,0.30223697,0.0000041029048,0.00004665926,0.6784344,0.0021347543,0.00041247485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039452728,0.00008290233,0.3486293,0.00022723855,0.00006460917,4.791668e-7,0.21857662,0.000034822293,0.00017581166,0.41571188,0.015816098,0.00028572566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001426917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006008389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33197716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006427894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008434243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4415539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011627423","doi":"10.1177/1473095205054603","title":"Rawls’s ‘Justice as Fairness’: A Moral Basis for Contemporary Planning Theory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Reflective equilibrium; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Normative; Law and economics; Classical liberalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Foundationalism; Politics; Public reason; Context (archaeology); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06905073781264442,"score_gpt":0.3407643549164012,"score_spread":0.2717136171037568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011627423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26242983,0.020674355,0.039106105,0.0045852833,0.0026849343,0.0015066639,0.0003666784,0.0017250085,0.66692114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675333,0.0000172752,0.0020823178,0.0021443632,0.0017166393,0.000088714485,0.000034416185,0.00005510829,0.026327891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971654,0.00067265553,0.00037881325,0.00051295146,0.0005023822,0.00076781673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949627,0.0040446306,0.00030591755,0.00032301733,0.0001138323,0.0002498997],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004169383,0.00030030843,0.00037930728,0.00013253184,0.0012148459,0.00018109634,0.00063138845,0.00023890573,0.00023308862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032120594,0.0002973865,0.00017276012,0.00024534483,0.00039785774,0.00054976164,0.000072201256,0.0003482606,0.0002009598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001997753,0.00014722176,0.012534535,0.000087294706,0.00015219265,0.00010922386,0.100098126,0.0017902417,0.00014062884,0.7462845,0.13137372,0.005284573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016462214,0.00023412172,0.0032450904,0.0008520786,0.00024872346,0.000020902264,0.043126274,0.00092625123,0.0004484239,0.11879063,0.82932377,0.0011375294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025194915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016176984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70510346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015739005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004221803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012583327","doi":"10.1177/1473095212441697","title":"“Never eat anything with a face”: Ontology and ethics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Sociology; Function (biology); Identity (music); Salient; Metaphysics; Computer science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.30096687025032426,"score_gpt":0.5443898553757062,"score_spread":0.2434229851253819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012583327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63471425,0.0076257223,0.15684408,0.021535134,0.00045689367,0.0004203169,0.0000101859,0.00024617807,0.17814724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98023576,0.00008746882,0.016212044,0.0011897404,0.00021215975,0.000009404534,0.0000013420843,0.000012365543,0.002039738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934794,0.0054779337,0.00008575615,0.00013076334,0.0003492391,0.00047692348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906075,0.008992294,0.00004410978,0.0000895804,0.000071917806,0.00019458224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02394276,0.000077912126,0.00013004408,0.000053456937,0.0007598752,0.00005093028,0.00011344344,0.00019672296,0.00007713598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004880259,0.000059114853,0.000016928787,0.00011337387,0.0012133315,0.0003628662,0.00004729225,0.0008451618,0.000015799444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048969392,0.000010544698,0.008484699,0.00001745361,0.000017951366,0.0000040492105,0.36592355,0.0000021542426,0.0000509629,0.6233078,0.00009027075,0.00204156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201007,0.0001939995,0.027753847,0.00027895256,0.00004046158,0.000018362278,0.3688766,0.000043236534,0.00012227402,0.38915402,0.2125034,0.0004947134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025545733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008286791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34552148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013942571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82981306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046789948","doi":"10.1177/1473095213513256","title":"On the future of urban design: Fabricating the future through Bloch’s utopians","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Relevance (law); Power (physics); Democracy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Globalization; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.026205259979102946,"score_gpt":0.2776408671115227,"score_spread":0.25143560713241975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046789948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12498434,0.0033314156,0.008745774,0.08578204,0.0019186643,0.0013414209,0.000016571557,0.0002447093,0.7736351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99071306,0.00002989043,0.00030661843,0.0046661906,0.0016868982,0.00004848804,0.0000010412668,0.000009819576,0.0025380165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985121,0.000679084,0.00015616983,0.00014556127,0.00016294421,0.00034417902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969353,0.002591943,0.00010260969,0.0002746832,0.000038568738,0.000056895664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013325342,0.000102609425,0.00012522517,0.00001505651,0.0007211059,0.0000643651,0.00053216016,0.000104060586,0.0006213306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029763716,0.00005474828,0.00006980894,0.000114706905,0.00041942697,0.00012710267,0.000043361346,0.00027865672,0.00011726631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007737733,0.000013809046,0.00008525891,0.0000031898244,0.00001655846,6.7729144e-7,0.02420156,0.000012798811,0.000011861592,0.95320106,0.018373115,0.004072349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082636536,0.000037843747,0.0009962635,0.000039023023,0.000016731057,0.0000010481393,0.0411439,0.000053184984,0.00014199788,0.6948796,0.2624819,0.00012588919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018854503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009425299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8657287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002955018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007019229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6803134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086319168","doi":"10.1177/1473095204044777","title":"Where is Feminism in Planning Going? Appropriation or Transformation?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Feminism; Sociology; Postmodernism; Gender studies; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020677319352961052,"score_gpt":0.2521511743383979,"score_spread":0.23147385498543685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086319168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992134,0.00016267181,0.00012317127,0.001487921,0.00006576305,0.00019338298,0.0000046253313,0.00008029729,0.005748168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998983,0.000009843284,0.000182879,0.00024722016,0.00005633799,0.00001676528,0.000032652115,8.367947e-7,0.00047042037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.000063828906,0.00021947439,0.00017854468,0.00014301372,0.00023494489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996739,0.00017318598,0.00005124054,0.000033891338,0.000024062208,0.000043697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006066437,0.00010928196,0.0001213767,0.000019816682,0.00015600924,0.000050570663,0.00014154508,0.00008911618,0.00019326425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055310218,0.000041309006,0.00003555515,0.0002437228,0.000027514086,0.00023333744,0.000019291849,0.00012882058,0.00003273963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026285253,0.00057500997,0.46168825,0.0004063764,0.00008272356,0.00023120864,0.23094113,0.0029727614,0.024278773,0.053593345,0.002666814,0.21993509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001001376,0.00026617653,0.796276,0.0004412155,0.000010618701,0.000017101404,0.025938332,0.00017134352,0.0031520007,0.15990016,0.01223777,0.0005879523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030469837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026338907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33458772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074825424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021806514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2116108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110633482","doi":"10.1177/1473095212441696","title":"Being and becoming: Writing children into planning theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Redress; Sociology; Neglect; Habitus; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016505831722132564,"score_gpt":0.2467428789065607,"score_spread":0.2302370471844281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110633482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99486,0.001604468,0.000031255433,0.00022735739,0.00009663461,0.00013480571,0.0000025199047,0.00013045568,0.002912491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987365,0.0000073422557,0.000305565,0.00025338907,0.00036510976,0.000009460236,0.000039843533,0.0000020080272,0.00028076215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986639,0.00026457175,0.00021215218,0.00023692146,0.00013518527,0.00048725496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869543,0.0010107479,0.00006949891,0.00005148209,0.000025101252,0.00014771943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022767547,0.00017186774,0.00017736705,0.000020283162,0.0005608658,0.000084726445,0.00017739368,0.000092400594,0.00011300941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027849345,0.000073795,0.000047755613,0.00012931855,0.00009626518,0.00031346772,0.00017354114,0.00018993158,0.000013167364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005226157,0.00002491612,0.933303,0.000010578327,0.000022589948,0.0000033504682,0.0047878665,0.0000018319939,0.0035372165,0.016250184,0.00011746759,0.04188873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093841794,0.000032744843,0.9173924,0.00006088868,0.000013189699,0.00001657676,0.004609206,0.000009774412,0.00065314263,0.07595972,0.00091137696,0.0002471902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022616201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010211614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059709538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000314204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052513055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4313783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154789417","doi":"10.1177/1473095204044778","title":"The Desire Called Civil Society: A Contribution to the Critique of a Bourgeois Category","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Bourgeoisie; Hegelianism; Democratization; Capitalism; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017886309264215524,"score_gpt":0.30916639100064974,"score_spread":0.2912800817364342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154789417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65356076,0.0039667436,0.07092571,0.11043875,0.0013154865,0.0017238478,0.00007316171,0.00035110905,0.1576444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966977,0.00003809101,0.000042676184,0.002575066,0.0001740142,0.00004209601,0.0000019214242,0.0000053034805,0.0004231292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888444,0.00031974664,0.00015774225,0.00011390557,0.00013614484,0.00038802295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828106,0.0013279422,0.00005285564,0.0001491016,0.00007844374,0.000110614485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031488633,0.00007017041,0.000114534145,0.000012550562,0.0010229681,0.00005166401,0.0002923857,0.00008033913,0.000028630071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015020756,0.000044059278,0.00010189449,0.00010347542,0.00044861954,0.000069204856,0.00004744001,0.00015012607,0.000027567248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003282565,0.000014565471,0.000056153873,0.0000029105743,0.000022129889,0.0000017308801,0.011684929,0.00006999724,0.000023074896,0.986443,0.0010092126,0.00063948287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026370023,0.000035406953,0.0010464935,0.000047321115,0.000020909816,0.0000016605014,0.009876522,0.000015036594,0.00035038122,0.8258947,0.16234173,0.000106138395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091910956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046360624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34313694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110003704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002893993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78679466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158823931","doi":"10.1177/1473095211427285","title":"Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Mediation; Indigenous rights; Reading (process); Democracy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.09803857321276536,"score_gpt":0.31494256708969204,"score_spread":0.21690399387692666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158823931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92626625,0.00051366305,0.007157281,0.000027203168,0.00059526344,0.0008799415,0.00001294288,0.00007198967,0.06447548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933374,0.00011021182,0.00008880036,0.00006731433,0.00019502729,0.000017459579,0.00005989526,0.00001328693,0.0001142762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996936,0.0016761033,0.000346542,0.00020117107,0.00032829624,0.00051184965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834585,0.0012190854,0.000200661,0.00012287157,0.000044502533,0.0000670295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061776564,0.000120199555,0.0001649822,0.00035265298,0.0018714163,0.00007300084,0.00022919454,0.00013809615,0.000037820053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004231176,0.000092684786,0.000025259,0.00037505216,0.00010310534,0.00024005736,7.743589e-7,0.0002897666,0.000029185821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012941903,0.00008867169,0.017033258,0.00003451931,0.000006836859,0.00003355427,0.9276509,0.00018601851,0.0000030202548,0.054706022,0.000010489423,0.000117269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011418413,0.0002525751,0.022564799,0.00083024375,0.000023828836,0.0000060064885,0.90295833,0.00021181713,0.00007067981,0.067215286,0.0042304816,0.0004940935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04506787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08227901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073067494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006745444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027651114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164632707","doi":"10.1177/1473095215596546","title":"Creation of property rights in planning by contract and edict: Beyond “Coasian bargaining” in private planning","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Property rights; Commons; Law and economics; Externality; Negotiation; Economics; Government (linguistics); Proposition; Business; Transaction cost; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030832272797376895,"score_gpt":0.24375934913478678,"score_spread":0.21292707633740987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164632707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8793005,0.004194807,0.00078084244,0.00006344575,0.0001698198,0.00020729446,0.000047619917,0.000038811268,0.11519689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875855,0.000017358501,0.0005158251,0.00013176283,0.00007444795,0.000018223533,0.00004527156,0.00002700498,0.00041157447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829865,0.00007700697,0.00073658745,0.00041873287,0.000068599045,0.0004004201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990774,0.00017559974,0.0004110913,0.00020349049,0.000020881698,0.00011157229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018124592,0.00021632858,0.0005717921,0.00044204545,0.000073601965,0.000049396545,0.00018003347,0.00018011175,0.0000199808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011290634,0.00020001829,0.000035609966,0.0002442947,0.00011860302,0.0003698789,0.000055038287,0.0003073124,0.0000133032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000595132,0.00017483046,0.7891157,0.00006399824,0.000046601846,0.0001945814,0.044374004,0.0028193921,0.00022818922,0.15950428,0.0016413727,0.0012418837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012146951,0.0008195581,0.44736177,0.0027843094,0.000034143595,0.00009808539,0.0021953655,0.018273845,0.0017670395,0.3346011,0.17775598,0.0021618528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007058502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012335362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34175396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008760856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029714527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8156509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171690259","doi":"10.1177/147309520323004","title":"The Future of Planning at the ‘ End of History ’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Global History, Politics, and Ideology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Hegemony; End of history; Ideology; Capitalism; Democracy; Politics; Reading (process); Sociology; Political economy; State (computer science); Political science; Neoclassical economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.021488337115466914,"score_gpt":0.2748502553127302,"score_spread":0.2533619181972633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171690259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040145902,0.122995995,0.000008247073,0.00019291404,0.0042414237,0.00016316702,0.000038487222,0.000027354552,0.87193096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004425509,0.0004767414,0.000019600642,0.00046735635,0.001172285,0.0000074929135,0.000021644166,0.000030892526,0.99337846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754876,0.0008788079,0.00040555623,0.00024126383,0.00047179058,0.00045383896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967959,0.0018479109,0.000663594,0.00047828,0.00012955091,0.00008476041],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024884017,0.00022117564,0.00040941828,0.00007727885,0.0007184511,0.00000700427,0.000794318,0.00043931507,0.0005446936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037328762,0.00014989654,0.0002082942,0.000031361036,0.0047367285,0.00003512857,0.00008939458,0.000468959,0.000037872393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004368786,0.0000063527054,0.000102317776,0.000025528489,0.00005169594,0.000005777764,0.019358236,0.000009441765,0.000004169854,0.49772763,0.482344,0.00032116944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080858954,0.000034750494,0.00009699105,0.00009857549,0.00007044815,0.0000034823736,0.0034512056,2.8903105e-7,0.0000056317663,0.084232844,0.91178554,0.0001394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014469645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020623961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42944154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013816757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015529648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329434651","doi":"10.1177/1473095214521585","title":"City and soul in divided societies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025251699397342182,"score_gpt":0.29611525251674964,"score_spread":0.27086355311940746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329434651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135079,0.00068259094,0.0005242553,0.00067966356,0.00014157659,0.00004556665,0.0000027446488,0.000081488135,0.084334224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940077,0.000018818444,0.00015245678,0.0003858332,0.00013120512,0.00000331888,0.0000010296461,0.00000485003,0.0052947607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915063,0.00026881136,0.000080839345,0.00013529218,0.0001494787,0.00021495487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910426,0.00071509986,0.000046577057,0.00007406171,0.000010901849,0.00004909493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00188441,0.000060919287,0.000099774166,0.000027091839,0.00023524844,0.000046961373,0.00011568835,0.00006373175,0.00003417306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079669774,0.000058930676,0.0000181635,0.00007778747,0.0002278348,0.00008923417,0.000030438852,0.00012856441,0.000011819215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004270281,0.000021854328,0.6880013,0.00001415384,0.000010430285,0.0000061798128,0.08402718,0.000041647894,0.00005116189,0.19749942,0.026236124,0.0040478664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048325656,0.000042433312,0.50176775,0.00020642855,0.0000115488365,0.0000015207349,0.009424776,0.00020494287,0.00005255303,0.29780388,0.18966496,0.00033597296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031901174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006892125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18623355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022315651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024150182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24031232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339760368","doi":"10.1177/1473095209357870","title":"Reflexivity and post-colonial critique: Toward an ethics of accountability in planning praxis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Reflexivity; Sociology; Praxis; Agency (philosophy); Normative; Technocracy; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06376662165482161,"score_gpt":0.4238473006551172,"score_spread":0.3600806790002956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339760368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99144804,0.0002115465,0.00008485468,0.0015019717,0.0003689317,0.0001406505,0.000044872817,0.00008379102,0.0061153537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983968,0.000007728046,0.0007951586,0.0004375166,0.00018084419,0.0000084092235,0.0000072797707,0.0000122700585,0.00015397555],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978489,0.0008038607,0.0002554889,0.00032750532,0.000377803,0.00038641723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973369,0.0019638797,0.00015787772,0.00023574334,0.0001362839,0.00016929448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008224177,0.00013430216,0.00024044071,0.00008117159,0.00029979795,0.000060552626,0.00030265088,0.00036982592,0.000044722794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008014331,0.00013651774,0.000033036285,0.00016893726,0.00065881957,0.00040198924,0.00006361593,0.0011955367,0.00000254665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008277681,0.00016846383,0.43804199,0.000089801935,0.000014922796,0.00003662991,0.4465974,0.000037163947,0.0059619574,0.106185675,0.00034993765,0.0016883053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006218856,0.00029398172,0.90714,0.00033955058,0.000025118063,0.000010373902,0.022365822,0.000103667364,0.00081070705,0.056028437,0.011750655,0.00050977984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007115448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002593226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46909803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044025157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004233923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341784539","doi":"10.1177/1473095215625707","title":"On embracing an immanent ethics in urban planning: Pursuing our Body-without-Organs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Politics; Sociology; Urban planning; State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Environmental design and planning; Epistemology; Agonism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Land-use planning","score_opus":0.05339164812834773,"score_gpt":0.3580654656941298,"score_spread":0.30467381756578205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341784539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589137,0.00040781804,0.0018240011,0.0030162737,0.00095220737,0.0002138642,0.000022394968,0.00039539987,0.034254357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220145,0.000012707879,0.00017192366,0.00070797105,0.0005804836,0.000014242589,0.0000061813257,0.000045484,0.006259581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964946,0.0010856616,0.0003339526,0.0005499572,0.0007262666,0.0008095849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733216,0.0017578534,0.00023470743,0.00038029047,0.000056435907,0.00023858582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004823478,0.00026207208,0.00030096766,0.00020029892,0.0006871161,0.00013475619,0.00059218326,0.00032614532,0.00004324718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003044306,0.00020850515,0.00006731448,0.00026344782,0.00015708104,0.0004256217,0.00006170016,0.0007770042,0.00011746137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007258219,0.00022694957,0.37176543,0.000036717014,0.00005731891,0.00037523214,0.2734717,0.0008488281,0.0032711416,0.33691287,0.010526278,0.0017816862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075254077,0.001800239,0.37981263,0.018506873,0.00019381635,0.000056346067,0.14338303,0.0007655447,0.0051643895,0.26209092,0.17506415,0.005636643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036225744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008204243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16453786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026262042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002367258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8502593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803322151","doi":"10.1177/1473095218776042","title":"The moral limits of autonomous democracy for planning theory: A critique of Purcell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Control (management); Law and economics; Power (physics); Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.09036046414335812,"score_gpt":0.3871233260105381,"score_spread":0.29676286186718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803322151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31504363,0.0018274937,0.018970562,0.008824593,0.0012981979,0.00089930155,0.00012325725,0.00024554323,0.6527674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.000007895957,0.0005319087,0.0004835548,0.00060237787,0.000013960648,0.0000027889673,0.000015759882,0.0010033869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981756,0.0006641008,0.00029575147,0.0001706038,0.0002314251,0.0004624986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916754,0.00761632,0.00016324372,0.00022121037,0.0002145773,0.00010925433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050752326,0.000112769056,0.0002114974,0.000050893585,0.00094498787,0.00003376177,0.0004759135,0.00017077917,0.00002701342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457168,0.00008689263,0.00010802923,0.000121142,0.00210673,0.00011315755,0.000048711005,0.00022481334,0.000008121243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031199088,0.000029227784,0.00037547044,0.00003290537,0.000031497137,0.0000016123755,0.023447458,0.000017473389,0.00018098213,0.97429734,0.00042924544,0.0008448003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016784604,0.00016511249,0.00038902144,0.00012650483,0.000032713753,8.8090206e-7,0.0048407875,0.00010968148,0.002466705,0.98480815,0.0067834095,0.0001091827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005930218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006914381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6822947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003001173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022172443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77623343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811113396","doi":"10.1177/1473095218763842","title":"Unsettling planning theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Theme (computing); Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03680984163163689,"score_gpt":0.3355455312333015,"score_spread":0.29873568960166463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811113396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4922105,0.003810854,0.011852764,0.00054139877,0.0021897405,0.00022121725,0.000034149434,0.0009725801,0.4881668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97798747,0.000011762907,0.0008175167,0.0009922336,0.0020502417,0.000009033163,0.000009192853,0.00003465635,0.018087873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757403,0.000699696,0.00023139715,0.00037313777,0.00043741186,0.0006843434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773955,0.0015214127,0.0001771578,0.00029561672,0.00009095388,0.0001753224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040354775,0.00019256007,0.00021099056,0.0001066286,0.001358616,0.00014071283,0.0005242818,0.00016015214,0.00044933672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015399781,0.00018784052,0.00007651268,0.00030020188,0.00075934426,0.0002499312,0.00006959641,0.00031175226,0.0005021605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005322694,0.00005814872,0.04833096,0.00001888029,0.00011222834,0.00014120055,0.17097543,0.00016590803,0.00038920454,0.7174267,0.056279406,0.0055696364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056978664,0.0001704897,0.010605234,0.0007311568,0.00006978289,0.000015832391,0.01843914,0.00021793655,0.0007198164,0.23023863,0.73738587,0.00083629345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014413745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015510534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008164952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014365974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897254329","doi":"10.1177/1473095218806929","title":"Pathways to legitimacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Deliberation; Public administration; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0473348383505151,"score_gpt":0.32826756870335005,"score_spread":0.28093273035283495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897254329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3730965,0.00020896834,0.003435176,0.000891,0.0008382302,0.00012598012,0.000015765292,0.0003239432,0.6210645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985035,0.000001894023,0.0008070642,0.0014866177,0.0011732065,0.000007658202,0.0000017469172,0.000010773758,0.011476024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990211,0.00014742989,0.00008811715,0.00018197842,0.00022851901,0.0003328364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.00027017054,0.000042577773,0.00015513232,0.000053839736,0.00014185093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010123268,0.00007468536,0.000086781256,0.000044034863,0.0005351078,0.00006633519,0.00027213563,0.000048975802,0.00031502938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007383467,0.00007331839,0.000027911507,0.00018273464,0.0002125425,0.00010254891,0.000038453665,0.000085465435,0.0013396485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012988405,0.00003081997,0.010974323,0.000003820679,0.00001862182,0.000038414637,0.15044668,0.000016845142,0.0004910038,0.55188245,0.2767899,0.009177241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108981505,0.00008204778,0.0077266786,0.00008277947,0.0000062543986,0.0000016231597,0.0033145885,0.0000129716955,0.0003270928,0.025731863,0.9624136,0.00019148279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020537955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029549794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68562376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041672636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008491792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036799252","doi":"10.1177/1473095220930766","title":"Our curious silence about kindness in planning: Challenges of addressing vulnerability and suffering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Compassion; Vulnerability (computing); Humiliation; Shame; Psychology; Pity; Social psychology; Harm; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Silence; Empathy; Acquiescence; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20820945121994386,"score_gpt":0.4169421256913569,"score_spread":0.20873267447141305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036799252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96932626,0.011267718,0.00019281943,0.0037280337,0.00029287513,0.00014257012,0.0000061590076,0.000104179846,0.014939362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999144,0.00028948952,0.00014602502,0.00019252754,0.00018318815,0.000005929418,0.0000012046866,0.00001279418,0.00002479666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818695,0.0006123507,0.00025137863,0.00031635506,0.00029063795,0.00034231364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987438,0.0008035475,0.00012425201,0.00013192465,0.000048732014,0.00014779074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00231039,0.000132864,0.00027505078,0.00006308943,0.0002661974,0.00004703425,0.0002596111,0.00016903252,0.000012410709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020668353,0.00013393343,0.000034668046,0.00015338838,0.0002993159,0.00019140694,0.00008765936,0.00045530513,0.000002932729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022263774,0.00006171409,0.052056026,0.0004252724,0.000019032579,0.000061940256,0.8794145,0.00093167345,0.0004491313,0.058142908,0.00008228353,0.008132861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012801065,0.0002607262,0.1829342,0.0032175458,0.00004697525,0.0000073419874,0.7158702,0.0012727481,0.0008644235,0.08516362,0.008049658,0.0010324867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001822207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036551202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16354434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028899796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108868095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5461647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111234860","doi":"10.1177/1473095220980499","title":"Creative or instrumental planners? Agency and structure in their institutional and political economy context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Structure and agency; Context (archaeology); Structuration theory; Politics; Realm; Sociology; Institutional theory; Function (biology); Public relations; Order (exchange); Control (management); Economic system; Political science; Economics; Management; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03304902464451757,"score_gpt":0.27882969670493857,"score_spread":0.245780672060421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111234860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95331717,0.00063803396,0.000047449048,0.00195263,0.00006106295,0.0001040261,0.00013079612,0.00003509398,0.043713734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977577,0.000009579621,0.00007384209,0.0018261737,0.00015182102,0.0000033095644,0.00001151042,0.000005036536,0.00016107335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991993,0.00014348344,0.00011555809,0.00021467874,0.00008014777,0.0002468414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994244,0.0003074652,0.000044820317,0.00003932571,0.000010227958,0.000173744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019620852,0.000103141334,0.00014505797,0.000029914367,0.0002418029,0.00005622195,0.00009289043,0.00007576787,0.00011080828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028986353,0.00008273818,0.000013406141,0.00007250668,0.0004865796,0.00019693493,0.00004311252,0.00018012879,0.0000031616628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003670249,0.000012752461,0.08914763,0.000016772314,0.000025523408,0.00006515232,0.08623978,0.000007811404,0.00002553108,0.82042307,0.0007723224,0.0028966102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038447976,0.00053179543,0.3596095,0.0005650375,0.000046379824,0.00009298412,0.19730413,0.0008903356,0.00036944405,0.25386924,0.18175068,0.0011256554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002859741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000947722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56655383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052389812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000133992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3373965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281706744","doi":"10.1177/14730952221107148","title":"Between virtue and profession: Theorising the rise of professionalised public participation practitioners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public participation; Sociology; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Equity (law); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Competence (human resources); Public administration; Political science; Law; Management; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05435843288941122,"score_gpt":0.3622670939148243,"score_spread":0.3079086610254131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281706744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97843724,0.0008793956,0.00045434613,0.006954981,0.0003905402,0.0002896604,0.00004148125,0.00007517035,0.012477175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979735,0.0000048875836,0.0000619245,0.0001458467,0.00015630416,0.00006656546,0.000012757401,0.000008467409,0.0015697207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996983,0.0020190773,0.00018090892,0.00015242762,0.0004634726,0.00020112678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977868,0.0016622342,0.00030372496,0.0001401357,0.000047389913,0.000059674257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044475207,0.00007197517,0.000114672905,0.00004791345,0.0018979791,0.00003791781,0.00021414661,0.000040141622,0.00012502751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009383934,0.00005372558,0.000027674836,0.00025367708,0.00030125218,0.00021695907,0.00011231072,0.0002931348,0.0000024484339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016054824,0.00007192026,0.20946285,0.00001711502,0.000047817186,0.0000053110252,0.072767764,0.000119035525,0.0001660923,0.70726883,0.007034999,0.002877725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011082162,0.00021881172,0.24124163,0.0003310535,0.00015581405,0.000005233133,0.21357064,0.00026803612,0.0002683457,0.2281602,0.31411576,0.0005562377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114299284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004466691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47910863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005184003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022607074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294756112","doi":"10.1177/14730952221124824","title":"‘ <b>¡</b> Eso no se dice’!: Exploring the value of communication distortions in participatory planning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Public relations; Citizen journalism; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13832946421820308,"score_gpt":0.35019600900038095,"score_spread":0.21186654478217787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294756112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788347,0.0025349488,0.00016569806,0.0004015766,0.00042921572,0.00015043783,0.000024467372,0.00008426852,0.017374692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983415,0.000023698314,0.000085383355,0.00014735646,0.0000786996,0.00017935867,0.000011492001,0.000013760031,0.0011187439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973981,0.0014341975,0.00027763686,0.00016685772,0.00041919947,0.0003040254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978749,0.0014556738,0.00022088607,0.00036606702,0.000030883784,0.000051583087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003760306,0.000092759146,0.00015036545,0.00007705771,0.0012921451,0.000025633703,0.0006002891,0.000028166167,0.00009094034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070644333,0.0000867726,0.00005234902,0.0003432305,0.0002857449,0.00018530001,0.00017875916,0.00043416512,0.000011527177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020979723,0.00017868381,0.31417394,0.000017836623,0.00004075988,0.00002525917,0.44311166,0.05533939,0.00014861883,0.17795476,0.00807176,0.00072753744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082974706,0.00016463638,0.4756205,0.00059543434,0.00009024409,0.000005541599,0.15441012,0.0028571843,0.00012867452,0.02262951,0.34200403,0.00066435593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016632401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006453599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33393228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017554595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011477362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361295934","doi":"10.1177/14730952231166567","title":"Heating up the sauna: Analogue model unraveling the creativity of public participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Creativity; Politics; Sociology; Social movement; Political science; Public relations; Participatory planning; Epistemology; Public administration; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07337198013995407,"score_gpt":0.29779308683657985,"score_spread":0.2244211066966258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361295934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99259406,0.000041952633,0.0032281757,0.00038603257,0.00006964668,0.000092674374,0.0000063826938,0.000052465733,0.0035286362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996839,0.0000066007583,0.000035080462,0.000110619185,0.000031205418,0.000020531521,0.0000111057025,0.000007008081,0.00009394158],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909467,0.00023733325,0.00016403919,0.00012813868,0.0001628973,0.00021292301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906594,0.0005781334,0.00009691149,0.00022226483,0.0000066962584,0.000030085612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002451368,0.00007077182,0.000090675676,0.000019423376,0.0003327684,0.00003437465,0.00024634963,0.000029163486,0.000110721965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000129692,0.00003541216,0.000035123605,0.0002815349,0.000037716745,0.00014114233,0.00014101133,0.00008331334,0.0001035589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026957465,0.000024169449,0.28595668,0.000030275045,0.000042474792,0.0000016620248,0.01438159,0.69101214,0.0016445569,0.0026266114,0.0004094224,0.0038434258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007940177,0.000011618458,0.08241958,0.000032952958,0.000018586008,9.6818e-7,0.0014247872,0.9029414,0.00044814925,0.012447043,0.00010786671,0.00006762174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019394951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013944111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21192926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020279635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007433466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25594193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396243397","doi":"10.1177/14730952241249799","title":"The online conversion framework: Understanding antagonism, planning theory, and social media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Land Economics Foundation","keywords":"Framing (construction); Agonism; Antagonism; Citizen journalism; Participatory planning; Sociology; Social media; Public participation; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Environmental planning; Geography","score_opus":0.06588109831427415,"score_gpt":0.3361285481694296,"score_spread":0.2702474498551555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396243397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75446177,0.0744549,0.08162529,0.017207019,0.014261284,0.0007343921,0.0004827079,0.0027240084,0.054048605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965901,0.00020520651,0.00012834455,0.00034035012,0.0011942354,0.0000040362916,0.000024138331,0.000029793126,0.0014838307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777764,0.00070894905,0.00019768438,0.00032928912,0.00044082553,0.0005455934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879375,0.011719851,0.00009230764,0.00012767756,0.000022582728,0.000100084544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004200496,0.000180077,0.00017928531,0.000077224846,0.0024843176,0.0004931887,0.00031930578,0.00020935552,0.0000471825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011986217,0.0001374803,0.00006930242,0.0002224518,0.00083060504,0.00021218996,0.0000929755,0.0006141172,0.000024587805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001667224,0.000009195116,0.001184904,0.000024063691,0.00005763549,0.00008107682,0.12733646,0.000009766764,0.000029343822,0.860899,0.008496717,0.0017051252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021569706,0.000033037817,0.0019422736,0.0007131154,0.00008252105,0.0000118096505,0.17190443,0.00031426203,0.000037795806,0.6528195,0.17154145,0.00038409114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032960415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011687895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24212828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017837012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013817214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402316472","doi":"10.1177/14730952241276686","title":"Perspectives on cities of the global south","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.034426482653391766,"score_gpt":0.3086575618214504,"score_spread":0.2742310791680586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402316472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33830875,0.008021144,0.000037706417,0.0029852553,0.0009676858,0.0000840158,0.000014853835,0.00015293532,0.64942765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941547,0.000051513896,0.000022700193,0.000048831098,0.00013136496,0.000001706953,2.5715212e-7,0.000003124938,0.005585785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941975,0.00014025343,0.000054147407,0.00009491994,0.00017954725,0.00011141198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970275,0.0001823557,0.000017033824,0.00006307548,0.000014647365,0.000020107158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041954743,0.000047908026,0.000053175387,0.000020272604,0.00018094406,0.000032503176,0.00015950945,0.0000338913,0.00012391034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012127231,0.000028789878,0.000045440378,0.00012213897,0.0002790326,0.000036719797,0.00002656218,0.00007094715,0.000032368367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009041669,0.0000044674994,0.001365373,0.0000067678466,0.000018676712,0.0000017436637,0.21522881,0.000003939091,0.0000027406197,0.7818694,0.00091693574,0.0005720825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066621826,0.000027209897,0.02322087,0.00042998279,0.00001707961,7.661828e-7,0.6562341,0.000007482456,0.00006852489,0.28446165,0.035328243,0.00013748453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020039555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069236557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.655846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058524347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008170917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13916938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412364991","doi":"10.1177/14730952251359052","title":"Rethinking planning in post-colonial cities: Institutional hybridity, power, and conflict","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Colonialism; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.0399367395142227,"score_gpt":0.3173533404726132,"score_spread":0.2774166009583905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412364991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8451673,0.0035068719,0.00010595211,0.002419588,0.00072386285,0.00013495242,0.0000055726196,0.00010829823,0.14782761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966712,0.0001278222,0.0001692224,0.00081810984,0.00008008069,0.0000081986245,0.000008563073,0.0000049478886,0.0021118606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988932,0.0002334061,0.00017273596,0.00020935756,0.00020684359,0.00028448497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991288,0.00066357787,0.000046294535,0.00006731688,0.000039529958,0.000054488315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015005702,0.000107558844,0.00014980896,0.00021019357,0.0006407678,0.00008546379,0.00018115723,0.00011566839,0.00007711979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005110993,0.00010571772,0.000025351315,0.00016006628,0.00041435502,0.00017423321,0.00009689803,0.0002615489,0.000007629844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001395486,0.000024173785,0.02707152,0.000024186193,0.000040820334,0.00010166167,0.20169301,0.000052698342,0.00007572025,0.7678739,0.001446584,0.0014561855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015218894,0.000083500585,0.3934279,0.0018172312,0.00002858708,0.00001373796,0.0440501,0.00007706823,0.00011918184,0.38861328,0.16955584,0.0006916767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027503647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012124959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37926063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010500702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003500334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4928333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}