{"meta":{"query_hash":"3301427e07b5","filters":{"venue":"Poetics"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3301427e07b5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Poetics"},"results":[{"id":"W1969156715","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2013.06.002","title":"From meat and potatoes to “real-deal” rotis: Exploring everyday culinary cosmopolitanism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Sociology; Reading (process); Elite; Aesthetics; Cultural capital; Mode (computer interface); Phenomenon; Anthropology; Social science; Epistemology; Art; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04178463890115096,"score_gpt":0.2308866681587495,"score_spread":0.18910202925759856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969156715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277406,0.0017020851,0.0036252772,0.0055949693,0.00013402817,0.000024911104,0.000027723294,0.000029539224,0.16112079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676883,0.00023411526,0.00039411083,0.00025239142,0.000013274224,0.000008363155,0.000007581667,0.00001547374,0.0023057326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881315,0.00088957587,0.000016333186,0.00009390445,0.00006569907,0.0001213883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989693,0.0004773311,0.000088792214,0.00011966225,0.00008187453,0.00026293113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016670522,0.00040288063,0.000281445,0.0011457485,0.007053398,0.010649908,0.0009996012,0.0013320447,0.003342351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020877786,0.00023106541,0.00021853065,0.0010000122,0.02785681,0.0062658302,0.0064900275,0.002935072,0.00023789509],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006392035,0.000077312805,0.0037083796,0.000079322286,0.000008113289,0.00063158915,0.87712413,0.000050484505,0.00071999955,0.10868384,0.0011221191,0.0077307657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011020031,0.000043023294,0.0046767737,0.000093467694,0.0000071525187,0.00043016838,0.9393794,0.000120656754,0.00027170384,0.022675162,0.03227855,0.000012941006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027021847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055785947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010649908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013778441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009339258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011181295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984802254","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2009.06.002","title":"High art, no art: The economic and aesthetic legitimacy of U.S. soap operas","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Mental Health Association","keywords":"Legitimacy; Opera; SOAP; Storytelling; Aesthetics; Sociology; Advertising; Art; Political science; Visual arts; Business; Literature; Law; Narrative; Computer science","score_opus":0.011167118773328884,"score_gpt":0.26711562203390615,"score_spread":0.2559485032605773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984802254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.266697,0.00062364346,0.0012833277,0.022969745,0.00039547164,0.000015415839,0.000048273996,0.00002505363,0.7079421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352336,0.000121034565,0.00024440957,0.00062605884,0.00006979943,0.000007354856,0.000006791473,0.000018651572,0.0053824703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850273,0.00054421305,0.00004165912,0.00019297109,0.0004251413,0.0002932387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967938,0.0017965725,0.00027902814,0.0004566856,0.000398288,0.0002755868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032936933,0.00021047588,0.00023281976,0.0011166114,0.0093314955,0.009311526,0.00063463516,0.0015612273,0.008323096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00943933,0.00016432516,0.00016791318,0.0010542987,0.020823367,0.0037818826,0.0037366839,0.004424938,0.00034464087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000740631,0.000035364388,0.0019536405,0.000019001594,0.0000055879186,0.00013131423,0.011402464,0.00009064108,0.00018400975,0.96061116,0.0062339674,0.019258816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048960974,0.00009365603,0.020516481,0.00038301267,0.000037968533,0.00028343668,0.077841,0.0012005483,0.0010471209,0.6153494,0.2831495,0.00004892368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00721902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021564301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093314955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026804043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021722773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027843535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987092181","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.005","title":"Modes of openness to cultural diversity: Humanist, populist, practical, and indifferent","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Humanism; Ethos; Agency (philosophy); Cultural diversity; Cultural analysis; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Field (mathematics); Social science; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13974829773410424,"score_gpt":0.37476564100899545,"score_spread":0.2350173432748912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987092181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43033347,0.0033547762,0.05979359,0.02628971,0.00030421204,0.00011136812,0.000089771005,0.00014596934,0.47957715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726844,0.00016977359,0.0012338125,0.00014491304,0.000044312594,0.000028619663,0.0000066327266,0.000014652583,0.0010888793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937104,0.0042566094,0.00017802851,0.00042814398,0.0009263802,0.0005004197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869436,0.007990514,0.0010054656,0.0021495742,0.0007095215,0.0012013403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009278479,0.00047384144,0.00058840035,0.0030456726,0.0043854876,0.013155295,0.0012631905,0.002633611,0.0031862813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020385146,0.00037802887,0.00052490295,0.0023125482,0.08759143,0.013000835,0.009601536,0.0035960553,0.00019809144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025345422,0.000014080669,0.0008709765,0.0000195603,0.0000045366846,0.00003631783,0.020271707,0.00012051882,0.00007177119,0.975355,0.00026368053,0.0029465517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024642877,0.000017521274,0.00110073,0.00005277023,0.000004664599,0.00010698672,0.015591786,0.00041274427,0.00007361032,0.9777655,0.0048371744,0.000011941294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081726204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000665841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013155295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023153552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019160669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04906988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009145793","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2005.12.001","title":"Factors influencing readers’ interest in new book releases: An experimental study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Attractiveness; Context (archaeology); Cover (algebra); Content (measure theory); Sociology; Advertising; Psychology; Social science; History; Art; Aesthetics; Engineering; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.08004384146947834,"score_gpt":0.2901251801743167,"score_spread":0.21008133870483836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009145793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.000010076278,0.000025446698,0.000026844102,0.000008250098,0.000049003134,0.00002140672,0.0000025576605,0.0007994665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601895,0.00004741516,0.00026000585,0.00008375097,0.00003659626,0.00024876013,0.00009188005,0.00000876935,0.003203774],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981172,0.0007979817,0.00016590772,0.00031327113,0.00040240766,0.0002032457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475854,0.04128043,0.0044938237,0.0022725698,0.0012724416,0.0030954054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033530036,0.00059298344,0.00081592903,0.0012273899,0.0016673156,0.003159025,0.0008835046,0.0015209311,0.0115984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021337008,0.0009399631,0.00053504977,0.0008341821,0.0017966221,0.0016798531,0.0010035349,0.002291691,0.0012054725],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05765098,0.41358104,0.3698704,0.00037147888,0.00039654446,0.002019271,0.053620342,0.0006012184,0.064630665,0.0022043039,0.002097144,0.032956544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006798968,0.09986355,0.84591055,0.00004501109,0.00052391924,0.00060105,0.022629987,0.0033519177,0.015429361,0.0015088017,0.0030957775,0.00024110822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001558778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001621769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006293572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005728476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038800538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018730130","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2006.06.001","title":"A general theory of artistic legitimation: How art worlds are like social movements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Framing (construction); Resource mobilization; Legitimacy; Sociology; Social worlds; Social movement; Epistemology; Political opportunity; Analogy; Social movement theory; Politics; Social science; Aesthetics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02016150518559722,"score_gpt":0.2705459948265033,"score_spread":0.2503844896409061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018730130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03829569,0.0009303752,0.13259159,0.028447572,0.0005472127,0.0001275073,0.00021597373,0.00018052528,0.7986635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608055,0.00037027634,0.012854961,0.000942552,0.00033214947,0.0002325782,0.00007547735,0.00009872156,0.024287798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997424,0.0011533132,0.000080949736,0.00049910136,0.00055767497,0.00028495071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487114,0.002888439,0.0004024523,0.0009585915,0.0005868141,0.0002926426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003414096,0.0005622813,0.0007230613,0.0033401742,0.005177743,0.012286814,0.001901014,0.0052866847,0.018627545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011098799,0.0004532734,0.00094585645,0.00335265,0.047450997,0.018629398,0.0036950589,0.004037387,0.0015068916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016301454,0.0000027752833,0.000039240822,0.0000045766637,0.0000012905649,0.0000065814006,0.0006733213,0.0000807746,0.000013543121,0.9982279,0.00032304693,0.000625401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068127383,0.000004026955,0.0001163522,0.000012179548,0.0000019575305,0.00003232143,0.0005275455,0.0005206206,0.000032421514,0.99135417,0.0073874923,0.0000042497118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030613265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019598065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018627545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031959827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021463567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062315404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019926590","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2014.10.001","title":"Making change in the kitchen? A study of celebrity cookbooks, culinary personas, and inequality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persona; Sociology; Advertising; Gender studies; Celebrity culture; Media studies; Psychology; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.11943694001755562,"score_gpt":0.3059758090612656,"score_spread":0.18653886904370998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019926590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871508,0.00016376251,0.000057116857,0.0009015726,0.00001177938,0.000008999287,0.00001339939,0.0000012455508,0.011691377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855775,0.00007492557,0.000035819776,0.00007899632,0.000005067482,0.0000084685835,0.0000068056847,0.00000255541,0.0012295177],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722666,0.0014999795,0.000055417215,0.0002186057,0.00023898321,0.000760343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363023,0.0030770453,0.0011463325,0.0003624005,0.00047319784,0.0013108071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027972404,0.00023881502,0.0004670174,0.0017659083,0.011539762,0.007911074,0.0013234295,0.001257803,0.005936731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009335428,0.0003039603,0.00021335574,0.0023542217,0.0099623315,0.005132972,0.006801863,0.0031312273,0.00022356809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022992917,0.0009290293,0.095729604,0.000066700406,0.000035166613,0.00031312054,0.85607964,0.000078178746,0.00025816524,0.026827116,0.0011773042,0.018276036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012984915,0.000046761812,0.082501754,0.000056359913,0.000010352674,0.00006400042,0.90928006,0.000105888714,0.00006634592,0.001801445,0.006039042,0.000015070467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04493313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07969837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04493313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039875633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028655843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08934319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027725380","doi":"10.1016/s0304-422x(01)00032-8","title":"Teaching art versus teaching taste: what art teachers can learn from looking at a cross-cultural evaluation of children's art","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Psychology; Visual arts education; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Art; Pedagogy; The arts","score_opus":0.06703802666995548,"score_gpt":0.41509039259155495,"score_spread":0.3480523659215995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027725380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123727,0.0038549418,0.0041628447,0.009962252,0.00017339375,0.00002791644,0.000024577621,0.00003026627,0.16939116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005276,0.0012728362,0.0013450892,0.00054247194,0.000024963314,0.000018112472,0.0000107030755,0.00005002388,0.0066830493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981365,0.0009233273,0.000058190133,0.0001245268,0.00051516667,0.00024219013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384344,0.0042802305,0.0004946162,0.0003164195,0.0006033482,0.00046191917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042515397,0.0003782809,0.00034171488,0.0011864603,0.0032773784,0.011167637,0.00068373757,0.0018779605,0.0033788404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014003733,0.00027397962,0.00036514955,0.00077688834,0.009817383,0.010014246,0.0031710018,0.003444886,0.0003073279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030892994,0.00030085692,0.035602707,0.00056409056,0.000075479446,0.0016962175,0.764737,0.00029814875,0.008585205,0.06878751,0.006215456,0.112828426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002538472,0.00015333538,0.058530908,0.0007155352,0.000073765856,0.0016270999,0.8681985,0.00030446693,0.007514147,0.02391219,0.038863547,0.00008107044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058294223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019126764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011167637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002001116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001260936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022484541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032355493","doi":"10.1016/s0304-422x(03)00004-4","title":"Evolution, extinction, or status quo? Canadian performing arts audiences in the 1990s","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Dance; Attendance; Poetics; The arts; Consumption (sociology); Musical; Population; Sociology; Period (music); Omnivore; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Demography; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Social science; Art; Political science; Literature; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033754098512510565,"score_gpt":0.2976394107597601,"score_spread":0.26388531224724954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032355493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398517,0.0071442714,0.00024306358,0.017998038,0.00027681328,0.000039850147,0.00080293306,0.000050731152,0.13359264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685176,0.0016125808,0.00008278051,0.0004211931,0.000050855393,0.000008042318,0.00012308515,0.000020660696,0.020829039],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970927,0.00017165171,0.000043870754,0.00021890781,0.00090731477,0.0015655807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645966,0.00049856794,0.00034239955,0.000075754244,0.0012969376,0.001326788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023936217,0.00047179704,0.0006601574,0.0056914417,0.017395182,0.008459354,0.0015450021,0.0020009426,0.012379773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059660124,0.00027790005,0.00028841995,0.007055038,0.007540415,0.002706475,0.0033743987,0.0029879115,0.0005630304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006490979,0.00017051089,0.07272832,0.0004474619,0.000059629165,0.001298189,0.51836675,0.00061622314,0.0026888214,0.19953635,0.044780217,0.15865847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021560221,0.00007677185,0.29630634,0.0003389385,0.00003594277,0.000295014,0.22238028,0.00049687515,0.00060273975,0.0033880293,0.47596192,0.00009555915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07385589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05660503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5358645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038964303","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2009.09.005","title":"Cultural classifications and social divisions: A symmetrical approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Eclecticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Class (philosophy); Cultural analysis; Consumption (sociology); Social class; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.06740613617324213,"score_gpt":0.353503534728669,"score_spread":0.2860973985554269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038964303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062204584,0.002260486,0.25765526,0.020428319,0.000752594,0.0002633999,0.00025510587,0.00013126404,0.6560491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.931431,0.0012451672,0.03803343,0.0011518562,0.00056067406,0.0007087699,0.00012895121,0.00008953724,0.026650578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994402,0.0032887352,0.0002563993,0.00049174705,0.001178888,0.00038218763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992743,0.003324061,0.0007720912,0.0013442556,0.00138435,0.00043216255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057954034,0.0005005116,0.0010279812,0.004981338,0.0049802843,0.009108945,0.002335107,0.0027127708,0.014377517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015141761,0.0005353681,0.00088861614,0.005147126,0.023544146,0.01512172,0.0060061147,0.003281688,0.0018617494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029665237,0.0000048452,0.00006104493,0.000007358612,0.0000012932853,0.000006257878,0.0006504517,0.0000504365,0.000018650868,0.996472,0.00028498052,0.0024396677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009603085,0.000008675491,0.00029099526,0.00003050388,0.0000062005493,0.000033217348,0.0015081599,0.00080542074,0.00003882161,0.99218655,0.0050772037,0.0000046346568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002367715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017388528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014377517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003452019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030898533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04809755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055352127","doi":"10.1016/s0304-422x(00)00025-5","title":"Sounds of contrast: an empirical approach to phonemic iconicity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Iconicity; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Phonemic awareness; Contrast (vision); Reading (process); Phonology; Intuition; Phonetics; Psychology; Vowel; Sound symbolism; Computer science; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12945944123331427,"score_gpt":0.4169990553194491,"score_spread":0.2875396140861348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055352127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48858285,0.0017423596,0.23132703,0.0034244522,0.00022881861,0.00014563228,0.00017810006,0.00012456092,0.2742462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894377,0.00022282715,0.008692992,0.00016492425,0.00005922965,0.00005850885,0.000029242528,0.000032319364,0.0013023561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993906,0.00022662366,0.000037123835,0.00014179056,0.0001591129,0.00004463059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99386483,0.0045611123,0.0002946631,0.00071278424,0.00042795655,0.0001386986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001462238,0.0003269849,0.00020720593,0.002882698,0.0010138835,0.0035541437,0.0008995557,0.0010595492,0.005695364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015874753,0.00024932047,0.00021583229,0.0015118468,0.008549345,0.0070264987,0.0028037387,0.001979145,0.00025547488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079628124,0.000079547826,0.00821893,0.0001667692,0.000014052814,0.000266708,0.015439584,0.0004104162,0.0075846193,0.9180364,0.00048187815,0.04922143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044792134,0.00017752298,0.03457111,0.00023765849,0.000049674934,0.002036951,0.023256462,0.008626857,0.0069359737,0.90171814,0.022283208,0.00006173733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046612634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055907964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005695364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006715405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045044333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019052923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930781101","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2019.03.001","title":"Meat as benign, meat as risk: Mapping news discourse of an ambiguous issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Risk communication; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.017033286160235216,"score_gpt":0.24974109248639043,"score_spread":0.2327078063261552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2930781101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275202,0.0061672763,0.0024661955,0.04814888,0.0007991033,0.000057848607,0.00060713285,0.00003893458,0.11419443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925621,0.0018556023,0.0007180241,0.00153652,0.00034631364,0.00003619783,0.00020113349,0.000043974997,0.002700134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958269,0.0024806983,0.0002471247,0.00029064255,0.0008153751,0.00033912185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9467345,0.043268595,0.0050728424,0.00093972025,0.0025992002,0.0013852457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361019,0.00033056215,0.0003344469,0.0059619364,0.004813769,0.012753783,0.0006564998,0.0023842312,0.0043674363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03768183,0.00024885594,0.0001504374,0.0065654684,0.007339101,0.007997935,0.0039748442,0.0028470694,0.00048191927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048979884,0.00010305622,0.038838316,0.0009700155,0.00003778312,0.0012032188,0.82326907,0.00018081308,0.001914594,0.07398108,0.012695387,0.0463169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016285252,0.00006499066,0.025992298,0.00075143384,0.00004608163,0.00041680087,0.84486353,0.00047817978,0.0006902644,0.009957316,0.11668945,0.000033358618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005278544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043525393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012753783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025431884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022477864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038929284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966396024","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101382","title":"Singing the romance: Gendered and racialized representations of love and postfeminism in popular music","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lyrics; Sociology; Popular music; Gender studies; Romance; Objectification; Persona; Consumerism; Popular culture; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Media studies","score_opus":0.03484347416266689,"score_gpt":0.32185316621829535,"score_spread":0.28700969205562843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966396024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89111054,0.0007898645,0.0005834508,0.0038592534,0.00017276157,0.000011848181,0.000022722283,0.000010087569,0.10343947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711585,0.00013863991,0.00005034439,0.00015598249,0.00004914122,0.000006080565,0.0000050830326,0.000008588131,0.0024703809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979797,0.0014103951,0.000034278335,0.00011010193,0.00022789057,0.00023766894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748105,0.0015242228,0.00037450492,0.00014856852,0.00018783775,0.00028371258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020941603,0.00031000224,0.0002876749,0.0018126286,0.008684615,0.007867263,0.0006477615,0.0014771938,0.006251459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061649093,0.00020918305,0.00014019669,0.0011484721,0.018520767,0.003810441,0.0041447124,0.002715454,0.00029233753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001613907,0.000076305754,0.006247871,0.00004760392,0.000012091852,0.00037688288,0.9210951,0.000030832605,0.0010916872,0.05989855,0.0011175359,0.0098442715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019154457,0.000057914032,0.018850034,0.00008705591,0.000010463065,0.00039413985,0.9522822,0.00011076709,0.00039468356,0.008782309,0.018992152,0.000019061574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003377341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056212703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008684615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012309854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073559146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020913184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034039145","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101448","title":"Accidental environmentalist or ethical elite? The moral dimensions of environmental impact","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Washington State University; College of Arts and Sciences, Boston University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Morality; Vignette; Social psychology; Moral disengagement; Elite; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019893341821836125,"score_gpt":0.2903638377411373,"score_spread":0.27047049591930117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034039145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084630616,0.0020331119,0.011470782,0.135162,0.0013539912,0.000022232596,0.00003549643,0.00003263629,0.76525915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870587,0.00038706165,0.000703874,0.0027409352,0.00030179915,0.000015708338,0.0000066083276,0.000018518955,0.008766894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636275,0.0020138405,0.00009272305,0.00027116688,0.0007174953,0.00054193794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326235,0.0038332145,0.00063058414,0.00058740587,0.00066011015,0.0010263316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006467919,0.00030049458,0.00029111514,0.0013066834,0.004712745,0.009230526,0.0008978131,0.0037857525,0.008741982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013831579,0.00020361909,0.00022185913,0.0009029442,0.054842725,0.010035931,0.005278714,0.0064854515,0.00046021593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063428797,0.00001915066,0.00043885052,0.000011003499,0.000002153147,0.00003947798,0.0030274678,0.00004992755,0.000032023734,0.99203837,0.0015954836,0.0027397047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008000603,0.000009065612,0.0010007257,0.000048159385,0.000003911842,0.000077332734,0.008534698,0.00020766903,0.00009714862,0.96173537,0.028270751,0.000007052015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013728341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018470179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009230526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022194963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027680353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034206033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093707452","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101498","title":"A life course perspective on cultural capital acquisition: How the timing and duration of musical socialization affect the taste for classical music and opera✰","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canada Research Chairs","funders":"","keywords":"Highbrow; Habitus; Socialization; Life course approach; Cultural capital; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Taste; Musical; Sociology; Attendance; Social psychology; Music education; Social science; Pedagogy; Visual arts; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05601374498746478,"score_gpt":0.32596037875295575,"score_spread":0.269946633765491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093707452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947977,0.0004029372,0.0043965885,0.0027458244,0.000027227781,0.000020213525,0.00016146865,0.00001241907,0.044256233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729985,0.00008371805,0.00041195264,0.00008899942,0.000010375186,0.0000051031725,0.000026029715,0.0000038426283,0.0020702204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997304,0.000096854026,0.0000052112305,0.000060253024,0.000028078704,0.00007910395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810576,0.00073633215,0.00036503267,0.000107524604,0.00014263154,0.00054268184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064556586,0.00017736066,0.0001411212,0.0005509455,0.0008849773,0.0028408854,0.00044004718,0.0008171332,0.009942585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023880382,0.00017172622,0.00022980777,0.00066025235,0.002248688,0.0019011734,0.0009885447,0.0009305563,0.0004194437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010645115,0.0017887669,0.5000601,0.00016547563,0.00025856405,0.0013164622,0.03210861,0.0038667466,0.028027292,0.35345593,0.0018908909,0.07599673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002519277,0.0003154334,0.9127139,0.000040636143,0.000051372226,0.00018698366,0.012276805,0.0019770951,0.0014905505,0.06388334,0.0069909417,0.000047741276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005602795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0089693675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009942585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009754555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007230214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0332613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184933987","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101595","title":"Artistic movement membership and the career profiles of Canadian painters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Painting; Field (mathematics); Movement (music); Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Visual arts; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.03555099569713238,"score_gpt":0.18842999504231528,"score_spread":0.1528789993451829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184933987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592268,0.00047250465,0.000043717602,0.001261958,0.000024682246,0.000020159685,0.0005525213,0.000006584898,0.038391072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869789,0.00037351524,0.000051450093,0.000101925994,0.000008385406,0.0000073522892,0.0002143944,0.0000068045692,0.0122574335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794275,0.00012547542,0.000033917295,0.00007882932,0.0005289134,0.0012900882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467456,0.00045134837,0.0005610256,0.00007394317,0.0019511606,0.0022880228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014507925,0.00018917533,0.00022789702,0.005893795,0.012108054,0.0051565547,0.0012808786,0.0008300459,0.017129103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00600987,0.00023398185,0.0002264769,0.007136809,0.0022508714,0.0010622886,0.0024563158,0.0011655223,0.0007280136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070327497,0.00024691838,0.68825686,0.00015523541,0.000054435564,0.00062330416,0.15949352,0.00041120817,0.0013373358,0.025630608,0.02901555,0.09407181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007632651,0.000037059785,0.8066537,0.00012775855,0.000010080703,0.00009209215,0.16281421,0.00020210091,0.00014415428,0.00037352246,0.029499924,0.000037689155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030132413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020377632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029593332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14785081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212845228","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101652","title":"Strategies for social engagement: Arts-service organizations as organizational intermediaries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intermediary; Intermediation; Public relations; Reflexivity; The arts; Service (business); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Position (finance); Business; Knowledge management; Political science; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.07088862610847287,"score_gpt":0.3266585533933053,"score_spread":0.25576992728483244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212845228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20228116,0.0009757463,0.05689133,0.052548617,0.0004974745,0.00045761804,0.00010023433,0.00026461217,0.6859832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768009,0.00017632822,0.004800594,0.00066679367,0.00006918757,0.00020842966,0.000029911644,0.000037596797,0.017210322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372476,0.004336004,0.00012141695,0.00042369828,0.0004206359,0.0009734217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896326,0.0045847353,0.0010738861,0.0007876637,0.0007543629,0.0031667028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006951013,0.000663475,0.0003085339,0.0032456657,0.011650694,0.022613639,0.0021802597,0.0051080044,0.032912374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010868304,0.00040312612,0.00058771076,0.0025238504,0.016996898,0.015857048,0.0143013345,0.0030751913,0.0024087457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006529125,0.00030617844,0.006486497,0.00009808269,0.000022679884,0.0006232425,0.067479484,0.0004177741,0.00055833225,0.8881703,0.0054483395,0.030323796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009648444,0.00018235155,0.0038538144,0.00035374827,0.00004156207,0.00036094175,0.24070166,0.0035295838,0.00076049333,0.61566466,0.13441578,0.000038841292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020553968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002982351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032912374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003681607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072679436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11010283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214857385","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101654","title":"Moral and aesthetic consecration and higher status consumers’ tastes: The “good” food revolution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consecration; Morality; Aestheticism; Sociology; Cultural capital; Symbolic capital; Moral disengagement; Habitus; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031500849978744236,"score_gpt":0.26519983888520043,"score_spread":0.23369898890645618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214857385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995139,0.00005275227,0.00016141564,0.0003291745,0.0000039661404,0.0000018846596,0.000005209388,9.588006e-7,0.004305671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997254,0.00001791197,0.000051360243,0.000022436003,0.0000029701637,7.8855896e-7,0.0000036452025,7.7066824e-7,0.00017463074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944633,0.0002550924,0.000018494033,0.000053328502,0.00014355754,0.000083218496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997486,0.0008145478,0.0008400254,0.00022519972,0.0002774914,0.00035670854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049324,0.00009911918,0.00015974352,0.00059745694,0.0010703758,0.0019974113,0.0001729991,0.00046693196,0.0028194473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040121106,0.00009776732,0.00022619205,0.00042972187,0.0036684233,0.0014785862,0.001178713,0.00096423016,0.00012532294],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007193512,0.00047246172,0.7453947,0.0001292914,0.00010118598,0.00039153214,0.14832637,0.00032236977,0.0055014133,0.03595389,0.0012746082,0.0614128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012935641,0.00015039956,0.9090749,0.000038564292,0.000025098812,0.00013390841,0.07649824,0.00077811547,0.00047417232,0.008356854,0.0044255313,0.000031232044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020592257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036716142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028194473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007172823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028293955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010838032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293108513","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101686","title":"Inequality Within omnivorous knowledge: Distribution of Jeopardy! geography questions, 1984-2020","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Localism; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Scarcity; Sociology; Economic geography; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.018683618988260212,"score_gpt":0.3103200074053048,"score_spread":0.2916363884170446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293108513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96841395,0.00070702034,0.0003016673,0.003326858,0.0000074793084,0.0000071848062,0.00026197938,0.000003276145,0.026970627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986513,0.000144835,0.000038456772,0.00004346334,0.000011983567,0.0000043546092,0.0000417305,0.0000018340068,0.0010619238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990669,0.00029141243,0.00005233894,0.00016185953,0.00016269757,0.0002649257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903185,0.006853165,0.0015944225,0.0006933597,0.0011117803,0.0007154379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002044851,0.00008235333,0.00028990395,0.0031179073,0.002552863,0.002666465,0.00063904736,0.00072737463,0.0062224334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014442672,0.00011736313,0.00013716223,0.005057855,0.009794331,0.004294834,0.0034175098,0.0009048713,0.00022998269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005645611,0.00021878337,0.4036032,0.00019257287,0.00008628365,0.0004813916,0.21673726,0.00065245054,0.0007924277,0.29512268,0.0042169807,0.07733147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014427854,0.000059546717,0.8508017,0.00010541766,0.000019866055,0.00015898644,0.08893386,0.00035978426,0.0002645556,0.04313161,0.01613381,0.000016348917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0478943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04437942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0478943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025098275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00144168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095231056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307351157","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101737","title":"Writing by women or for women? Either way, You're less likely to be reviewed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gender studies; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.06884519512314487,"score_gpt":0.3396778290072203,"score_spread":0.27083263388407547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307351157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035511225,0.08374229,0.0030043202,0.5931442,0.12199348,0.00044004657,0.0010044454,0.0007075764,0.16045241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13523623,0.06507382,0.005476302,0.169317,0.07896273,0.00087276817,0.0013815837,0.0009800292,0.5426995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214735,0.01297962,0.0022618,0.0017504516,0.008892511,0.0019682883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7728722,0.05042975,0.040177714,0.00994873,0.08022801,0.04634357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014394716,0.0005214161,0.0014456111,0.004378211,0.0042643817,0.009718962,0.0013725471,0.0039864974,0.078875065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19955178,0.00048371832,0.00073164527,0.0024663918,0.0028536753,0.0070734476,0.0042184955,0.0040209997,0.04575141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014578048,0.0001184719,0.0075788405,0.0019520032,0.0000741468,0.0007513707,0.0035207034,0.000045490928,0.0011012775,0.004167742,0.82456684,0.15597738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043802356,0.00014766613,0.0060202377,0.003473979,0.00004810252,0.0021579808,0.007623961,0.000061049934,0.0003987883,0.0033759894,0.97661054,0.00003784157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012197683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026459643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99573565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018650983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01205855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26386338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402035613","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101918","title":"A taxonomy of artists’ postures to grasp the plurality of cultural production practices: Putting an end to the cicada and the ant","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Sociology; Performing arts; Discipline; Taxonomy (biology); Aesthetics; Visual arts; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.11485968946691186,"score_gpt":0.3602673081892261,"score_spread":0.24540761872231423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402035613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39435813,0.015188327,0.05789751,0.01661328,0.0006417628,0.00058529153,0.00023765049,0.0002113415,0.51426667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96533984,0.0036709185,0.022096077,0.00058194343,0.00007082838,0.00037000258,0.00016458325,0.000075866985,0.007629968],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899412,0.004779299,0.00066210685,0.0008833334,0.0025926784,0.0011413253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98665965,0.0063072923,0.0014259913,0.0019490145,0.0022465403,0.0014114595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009767462,0.0010181308,0.0006905191,0.0107173165,0.008385757,0.016308023,0.0019422328,0.0029395937,0.0028748247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012320946,0.00054723065,0.00090183207,0.009548115,0.026724966,0.011729191,0.0069925296,0.0041446807,0.0005451732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052420994,0.00005209635,0.01558969,0.00047143322,0.000016264126,0.0003389627,0.46045086,0.00038414012,0.00087427924,0.43989056,0.0034763145,0.07840301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029457344,0.000111272675,0.034478363,0.0029981842,0.00003580112,0.0013310314,0.5081945,0.0021075015,0.0003952008,0.23459248,0.21563086,0.00009534063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013303692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01645036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016308023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007462197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008123498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054142356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403964756","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101945","title":"Homologies in fields of cultural production. Evidence from the European scientific field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Production (economics); Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.12611047753669946,"score_gpt":0.33990197782829057,"score_spread":0.2137915002915911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403964756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7969331,0.013026364,0.0095589375,0.003357292,0.000107847445,0.00007713988,0.0004843497,0.000051504077,0.17640346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974299,0.0007251637,0.00066951266,0.00009205199,0.000021428348,0.000011470403,0.00011292124,0.00000895602,0.00092865666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98613095,0.0067059444,0.00082933734,0.0025049287,0.0029353532,0.00089338305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094385,0.058010448,0.013221453,0.0080326805,0.008766391,0.0025304952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011798969,0.0002411162,0.00039053796,0.008752038,0.0024565463,0.0043669906,0.00075335393,0.00072833395,0.012255062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050187442,0.00026801965,0.00052061747,0.01030314,0.007944249,0.0065277456,0.005591155,0.00077360414,0.00066979043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007704124,0.00018997057,0.2910551,0.0011010634,0.00027848445,0.00059266353,0.06921798,0.0010845229,0.0013880973,0.38246018,0.0029144562,0.24894693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009111718,0.00019176045,0.7939369,0.00057118194,0.00009445548,0.0010646458,0.044185825,0.0015771973,0.0009579578,0.11006777,0.047211587,0.00004960295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008474438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005064715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99754345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024517763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019352474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062399626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413867424","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102043","title":"Who remembers fake historical figures? Differentiating between passing knowledge and dispositional openness in cultural research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10664305919579324,"score_gpt":0.44303104184442516,"score_spread":0.3363879826486319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413867424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97940916,0.00034303736,0.0034572373,0.0014111677,0.00005320477,0.000023872379,0.0000363491,0.0000102267295,0.015255763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998979,0.00012695049,0.00042208415,0.000107480104,0.000025963567,0.000010969715,0.000018451496,0.0000044900976,0.00030468687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987144,0.006161421,0.0010490767,0.0008125575,0.0014808424,0.0006248028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8797772,0.079895474,0.021308571,0.012842064,0.004071842,0.002104802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01883146,0.00024137796,0.00050574815,0.0038135627,0.0020229435,0.0066482476,0.0006676367,0.0013726975,0.0033824907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11264227,0.00039197004,0.00042450387,0.0018345873,0.008314532,0.011992855,0.0037260342,0.0018462227,0.0003021346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033888963,0.0002022014,0.51670295,0.00032647347,0.00018012288,0.0007256979,0.35961267,0.00023152036,0.001633836,0.0501642,0.00089164736,0.06898984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029805948,0.00034062014,0.5313861,0.0006657123,0.00016185327,0.0024430065,0.38376668,0.0019330138,0.0029754501,0.066600956,0.009528403,0.00016842634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010048978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001186363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01883146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007679829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048715377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09959149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416436960","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102022","title":"The embeddedness of marketing: Queer representation in advertisements by mainstream Chinese companies in mainland China, 2012–2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Mainstream; Lesbian; Queer; Mainland China; Embeddedness; China; Thriving","score_opus":0.014028418848995021,"score_gpt":0.3688010324631526,"score_spread":0.3547726136141576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416436960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893735,0.00024765055,0.00005041104,0.0017469932,0.000014577149,0.000007814702,0.00005180992,0.0000026302616,0.008504468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817204,0.00009672132,0.00001428882,0.00012544057,0.000012672263,0.000002035321,0.000015336276,0.0000018918449,0.0015596154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994531,0.0001789515,0.000020081345,0.000054146563,0.00012078098,0.00017287751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813384,0.00072164234,0.00061677414,0.00006670846,0.00021506294,0.0002460006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012410791,0.00011845541,0.000104948915,0.0013170821,0.0029356577,0.0021659022,0.00030713956,0.0006569358,0.0074418294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024935293,0.00012772763,0.0001028786,0.0016434361,0.0023053994,0.0016878648,0.0010821032,0.0009210044,0.00020258265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033258236,0.00013331279,0.44471756,0.00013819202,0.000037306774,0.0012442527,0.48352978,0.00006453463,0.0022408692,0.02401202,0.005151186,0.038398437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011479551,0.000049307135,0.6991496,0.000102452526,0.000033370703,0.00023719866,0.2808501,0.00048748654,0.00053989334,0.0010216417,0.017489752,0.000027757304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100251526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17363335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100251526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031227996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022588144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19933599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416545101","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2025.102062","title":"Loot, legitimacy, and provenance: Intermediaries and the legitimation of looted cultural objects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poetics","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amgen (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legitimation; Provenance; Intermediary; Anonymity; Power (physics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.008558793445325188,"score_gpt":0.24978889369971127,"score_spread":0.24123010025438607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416545101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42490047,0.0034003786,0.1041129,0.019357154,0.00028875086,0.00019427792,0.0001408559,0.00022781984,0.44737738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888642,0.00034618453,0.004099415,0.00014815725,0.000033542143,0.000029244844,0.000023720786,0.00005053509,0.006404974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380916,0.0033359462,0.00031462873,0.0007639979,0.0012361677,0.0005401216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801139,0.011758707,0.0020022322,0.0039923177,0.001390573,0.0007421943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010019438,0.00038279936,0.00047671964,0.0034081582,0.010484845,0.017977621,0.0013691103,0.0025320204,0.0067605968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024590341,0.00045509523,0.0003893202,0.0034059712,0.07327509,0.026745554,0.011102752,0.0033450746,0.00048324224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003464016,0.00001617677,0.002492735,0.00005276984,0.0000054905577,0.00034349406,0.07297808,0.0001424264,0.0003159003,0.9135734,0.0004602599,0.009584612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034342298,0.00004537041,0.0034731543,0.0007248633,0.000027934206,0.00075497956,0.06634994,0.00090798136,0.0013773439,0.8170174,0.1092309,0.000055778997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00552894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063943737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017977621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005293055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007256039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05298847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}