{"meta":{"query_hash":"e3daa3c122f1","filters":{"venue":"Policing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e3daa3c122f1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Policing-an+International+Journal+of+Police+Strategies+%26+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W2765449540","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-06-2016-0081","title":"Correlates of subject(ive) resistance in police use-of-force situations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing-an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Multinomial logistic regression; Officer; Psychology; Use of force; Situational ethics; Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Psychological intervention; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Political science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0774768757440838,"score_gpt":0.4143391794747769,"score_spread":0.3368623037306931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765449540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90088725,0.000013202006,0.0003134599,0.0022513669,0.0006950702,0.00017219562,0.000038572573,0.00001264004,0.09561624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944558,0.0010321283,0.0013843025,0.00014794276,0.000543068,0.0000041199605,0.000003865575,0.000015342242,0.0024134226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976323,0.0002048413,0.00083820935,0.00016137357,0.0008312201,0.00033202695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996701,0.00029881753,0.0018296458,0.00041071128,0.00062263693,0.00013717609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009149275,0.00015883506,0.00031072047,0.00066665676,0.00036688845,0.00046772457,0.00144422,0.000083230996,0.00009963308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017618095,0.00016089168,0.00016013638,0.00019265091,0.00044428074,0.003028771,0.00014698072,0.00024405954,0.000006545093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024244984,0.00039543907,0.057838485,0.00006618661,0.00044226318,0.000010243539,0.17998727,0.0034069815,0.0007092751,0.75423956,0.0006468252,0.002015024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086953625,0.000119664466,0.93255216,0.0004933941,0.00014808093,0.000008152439,0.04605727,0.00012434088,0.000108281274,0.015129708,0.0041386588,0.00025074193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52052325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42559996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87471366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022513796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028553797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65609723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}