{"meta":{"query_hash":"63a9a1e98326","filters":{"venue":"Policy & Politics"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/63a9a1e98326","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Policy+%26+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1969898611","doi":"10.1332/030557302760094694","title":"Bringing difference into deliberation? Disabled people, survivors and local governance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Mental health; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Citizen journalism; Corporate governance; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Business","score_opus":0.11721852582077606,"score_gpt":0.3991664712927677,"score_spread":0.28194794547199165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969898611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3239286,0.00969656,0.00638904,0.25518665,0.00036261295,0.00007314557,0.00005023258,0.00006851851,0.40424463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044085,0.0008341265,0.000189678,0.0019905127,0.000042547814,0.000021853752,0.0000051711345,0.000009025356,0.0064663514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022853,0.007692698,0.00016668682,0.00023731972,0.00044877938,0.0012260306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950329,0.0032603797,0.00044374177,0.0002589466,0.00024105262,0.00076299044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007165648,0.00018450306,0.00032879578,0.00089701155,0.009172114,0.011446179,0.0009441125,0.0025335432,0.005774897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00980253,0.00021457388,0.00019592188,0.0012192328,0.0458507,0.010059674,0.0076330337,0.0023291272,0.00043244078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028903676,0.00003371328,0.0020292492,0.00012196844,0.0000075875964,0.0006258962,0.3155589,0.00028538372,0.00012262027,0.66476405,0.0051590567,0.011262695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028533474,0.00003452261,0.0021193381,0.0004048602,0.0000098011,0.00019154596,0.5662316,0.00020489277,0.00020357824,0.25092602,0.17961739,0.000027887572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021648828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020278204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021648828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064489273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04679042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986579376","doi":"10.1332/030557308x313705","title":"Reinventing Westminster: how public executives reframe their world","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Cognitive reframing; Public administration; Public service; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; New public management; Mythology; Service (business); Political science; Sociology; Management; Public relations; Public sector; Law; Politics; History; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.19631044125532116,"score_gpt":0.4049794971770793,"score_spread":0.20866905592175816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986579376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33382455,0.013124379,0.0055718636,0.19488335,0.0014959087,0.00007566295,0.000059795504,0.00017851546,0.45078593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9119913,0.0026029935,0.0006605166,0.013047222,0.0002746256,0.000024858091,0.000023988761,0.00013033977,0.07124422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930848,0.0034210435,0.00014865941,0.00054277125,0.00068369956,0.0021190776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965071,0.0013268576,0.00037456155,0.00034089637,0.00054382713,0.00090675335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008088946,0.00038770615,0.00050199206,0.001601623,0.017159041,0.022547085,0.0011433859,0.0030935248,0.008113109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013186201,0.000600476,0.0002700365,0.0019819678,0.024652889,0.017638778,0.009730915,0.005651357,0.0014415949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000836863,0.000043696924,0.0038955137,0.00009161239,0.000015061931,0.00043067845,0.40797138,0.0001852393,0.00036680652,0.49429247,0.03939984,0.053223986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011823684,0.00004117181,0.0024772175,0.0002490619,0.000012435911,0.00010629691,0.17238006,0.00021006945,0.00033171143,0.04515852,0.7789818,0.000039904593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068267904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109538294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068267904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015487317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012972237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13574111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999294268","doi":"10.1332/0305573022501548","title":"Third way social policy: Clinton’s legacy?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Ideology; Undoing; Welfare reform; Public administration; Politics; Thatcherism; Sociology; Legislature; Political economy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.07697481967112398,"score_gpt":0.38658727191550746,"score_spread":0.3096124522443835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999294268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029650338,0.010573605,0.000915215,0.8835797,0.0046680905,0.000012162069,0.000017746761,0.000019329993,0.09724916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31086662,0.014687074,0.0016628805,0.5260704,0.008216134,0.0001790232,0.00004088114,0.00014420672,0.13813278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882712,0.0057842126,0.00028104478,0.001280329,0.0026655213,0.001717731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847551,0.00971321,0.00065242726,0.00080112135,0.0019988287,0.0020791877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120580895,0.0004695972,0.000723689,0.0021373772,0.016772933,0.024100823,0.0019924063,0.015266612,0.007740338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027123628,0.00040430803,0.00043472147,0.0024415662,0.040224317,0.014277719,0.0055063097,0.022174016,0.0010782301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006778792,0.000014737509,0.000067934474,0.000034658908,0.0000024936119,0.00004939775,0.0023931004,0.000065593966,0.000015179525,0.9242853,0.06762338,0.0054414687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001194778,0.0000099270055,0.00017080008,0.00030844557,0.0000027377457,0.000037921833,0.003231879,0.0001570387,0.00007934772,0.21614322,0.77982545,0.000021342143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03907951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031859946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03907951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022506462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02403883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16329658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004690677","doi":"10.1332/030557311x546352","title":"The administrative efficiency of basic income","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Edinburgh","keywords":"Basic income; Praise; Public economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Politics; Low income; Political science; Demographic economics; Law; Psychology; Market economy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11137594510805515,"score_gpt":0.403145009385906,"score_spread":0.2917690642778508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004690677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14362887,0.004368827,0.13614623,0.056420587,0.0006460911,0.0001701213,0.00042327307,0.00036846462,0.65782756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96904624,0.0010208704,0.011355457,0.0021681364,0.00044949132,0.00010780108,0.00009326248,0.00009362751,0.015665011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808147,0.008404186,0.0007710709,0.0014685227,0.005930955,0.0026105451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829743,0.0071274727,0.00191684,0.0043990347,0.0029795375,0.00060293387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014261206,0.00025292212,0.0006376557,0.0018373522,0.0025489745,0.007839572,0.0015827776,0.0014220427,0.0076620453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041841198,0.00037488656,0.00087316177,0.0017109644,0.01575642,0.007161772,0.006992546,0.0040982803,0.0009816273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014686248,0.0000067346423,0.000585589,0.000016588618,0.0000059893946,0.000009778599,0.00018350905,0.00040892515,0.000059558603,0.9929224,0.0011773905,0.0046087275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003053552,0.00009108853,0.008633387,0.00017145145,0.000037200887,0.00017652786,0.0007293997,0.0034876468,0.0012218083,0.8715261,0.11385885,0.000036040423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054679415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003860478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014261206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059367674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061516035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07542133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022315530","doi":"10.1332/0305573022501674","title":"The social economy and the state: linking ambitions with institutions in Québec, Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"State (computer science); Autonomy; Social economy; Power (physics); Political economy; Democracy; Economic system; Political science; Economy; Economics; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.0347619098160804,"score_gpt":0.3100055468962335,"score_spread":0.2752436370801531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022315530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676941,0.011991731,0.0019313624,0.056601036,0.00017897425,0.00013917715,0.0016980977,0.00008102415,0.25968447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748789,0.0014807588,0.00036067073,0.0012094508,0.00001053096,0.000026337457,0.00011839841,0.000012548139,0.021902405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815196,0.0004244065,0.000037045767,0.00012814139,0.00036400388,0.00089446065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970361,0.0007346352,0.0002431052,0.00006617571,0.0009567789,0.0009632729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015877383,0.00019105841,0.000261738,0.0016789576,0.015229243,0.0070218625,0.0012068921,0.0012308641,0.006882604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003179768,0.00022483764,0.00025076038,0.0040152576,0.0074616782,0.0016729636,0.002223318,0.001781879,0.0001664995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016697959,0.00011639259,0.07455626,0.00035985888,0.00007737861,0.001494239,0.09255657,0.005160127,0.0007705148,0.72399575,0.046061598,0.054684337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080593345,0.00005967882,0.36326593,0.0010382726,0.00010238211,0.00022662514,0.14860359,0.005271743,0.00062995026,0.03258914,0.44787028,0.00026174125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99907047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21072981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21072981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17342173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9154416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056101003","doi":"10.1332/0305573052708483","title":"Resisting and reinforcing neoliberalism: lesbian and gay organising at the federal and local levels in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Lesbian; Politics; Resistance (ecology); Gender studies; Identity (music); Sociology; Social movement; Political science; Political economy; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04634907204389251,"score_gpt":0.3231728577625127,"score_spread":0.2768237857186202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056101003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637088,0.00049119006,0.0002671289,0.0051159416,0.000020782989,0.000029856206,0.000037311504,0.0000099259405,0.030319018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481344,0.00018001549,0.00011459931,0.00034908493,0.0000029973335,0.0000075135745,0.000013285888,0.000004902249,0.004514254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960045,0.00088726263,0.000051811767,0.00023630467,0.00065043283,0.0021697632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970335,0.00064884964,0.00029524055,0.0000931028,0.0007117057,0.0012176727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023925924,0.0002046376,0.00033505453,0.0012703805,0.037216987,0.0069659525,0.0014889303,0.0013894406,0.004406595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036472587,0.00027037424,0.00021654241,0.0017885945,0.014592867,0.0012900273,0.0046761776,0.0021957639,0.00015699852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000141732,0.00010994962,0.03937729,0.00012707782,0.000022580678,0.0016027819,0.8554235,0.0005807339,0.002307084,0.06742468,0.005667305,0.027215324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703744,0.000036860478,0.055487286,0.00010450742,0.000020333473,0.00012888658,0.87476593,0.00037089808,0.0007032806,0.0020857635,0.06623056,0.000048657224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107894175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107894175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1132656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7828307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063909545","doi":"10.1332/030557312x655611","title":"Transforming Vietnam: a quest for improved efficiency and transparency in central government procurement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Procurement; Liberalization; Government procurement; Craft; Business; Politics; Government (linguistics); International economics; Public economics; Economic system; Economics; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.015838862263204974,"score_gpt":0.2517810501083019,"score_spread":0.2359421878450969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063909545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.747429,0.00079723645,0.009587635,0.010639922,0.000040151233,0.00026863505,0.000052493986,0.000045250486,0.23113966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949704,0.00027512855,0.0013784611,0.00016741987,0.000005636986,0.000027329368,0.000012977841,0.000009590345,0.0031530892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595475,0.0026220658,0.00008243755,0.00014092303,0.00048601595,0.0007138462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630654,0.0017464848,0.00062381604,0.00035968024,0.00056917686,0.00039445513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056972383,0.00020436947,0.00024958947,0.0005630146,0.0035539304,0.007692017,0.0005626391,0.00075443834,0.0042358856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046966714,0.00017761333,0.0001748025,0.0020879295,0.0049310033,0.0036677367,0.0029839934,0.0018642801,0.00023973259],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022017895,0.00038892688,0.030417632,0.0005711269,0.000039787912,0.0044124033,0.09986505,0.011723592,0.004092825,0.7267827,0.0043183155,0.11716756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020334095,0.00090305693,0.05171807,0.0013808196,0.000083370134,0.0032789286,0.38183182,0.021297317,0.009458696,0.16148126,0.36823928,0.00012400643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032924425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03697753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032924425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008895731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012812871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06546557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065457091","doi":"10.1332/030557312x655882","title":"The politics of poverty in the European Union: how states respond to the open method of coordination on social inclusion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; European union; Member states; Convergence (economics); Power (physics); Economic growth; Political economy; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; International trade; Social science","score_opus":0.06004984778953958,"score_gpt":0.4190128469647348,"score_spread":0.3589629991751952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065457091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59272,0.004753572,0.010218658,0.067420505,0.00036813976,0.00007408115,0.000042252293,0.000046866808,0.32435596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965725,0.00034556328,0.00032883044,0.00111766,0.000021514867,0.000023621777,0.0000043155446,0.000008461103,0.0015775787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675195,0.025477732,0.00055170956,0.0010818815,0.0021351625,0.0032340842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233866,0.0054019466,0.0008004479,0.00049749255,0.0004894431,0.0004720594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021150474,0.000266859,0.00056642905,0.001794171,0.008694617,0.013201294,0.0008944434,0.0041744784,0.002403938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01815946,0.0003134589,0.0006161859,0.002378754,0.026641209,0.007976411,0.014273088,0.0028264069,0.00015098708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010639458,0.000050973176,0.004995113,0.000118419695,0.00003239564,0.00019889828,0.10559914,0.0017496783,0.00032577894,0.8618974,0.0020975207,0.02282832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076640164,0.00019505515,0.024816712,0.001000341,0.00006470591,0.00013315973,0.17698179,0.002047494,0.0009424703,0.5868825,0.20676795,0.00009121282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063985717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055598025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021150474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007550067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006063028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111855686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074281169","doi":"10.1332/030557310x488448","title":"The politics of social policy change: lessons of the Clinton and Bush presidencies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Social policy; Social change; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07370805079352324,"score_gpt":0.41594556704289143,"score_spread":0.34223751624936816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074281169","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0868547,0.019918617,0.0047960146,0.5535906,0.0011971481,0.000047236314,0.000059720387,0.000021566386,0.33351436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96398973,0.0059722164,0.0009526239,0.01802143,0.00063926255,0.000049585316,0.000016799333,0.00001807919,0.010340179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222976,0.0051913606,0.00009009092,0.00047749333,0.0009721754,0.0010391453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941723,0.004328568,0.00024418632,0.00026937528,0.00046589176,0.000519776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010102521,0.00028145118,0.0005849684,0.0012729373,0.0069561466,0.008468906,0.00079382514,0.0047764145,0.0032845016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010796524,0.00024488708,0.0004215675,0.0014325632,0.036807418,0.0070741675,0.004767458,0.00693921,0.00024861214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013721963,0.000018589804,0.00031993876,0.00002586473,0.000005812007,0.000050780836,0.0027335787,0.000462574,0.0000619471,0.9873505,0.0031755145,0.005781208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049264763,0.00004105561,0.0030787864,0.00027999817,0.00001538401,0.000038694656,0.010997283,0.000978284,0.00035495803,0.8039051,0.18023305,0.000028103805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033801153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042681683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033801153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014264061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0099224765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10349351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078112660","doi":"10.1332/030557302760590378","title":"Toward a self-regulatory form of accountability in the voluntary sector","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Voluntary sector; Business; Private sector; Public sector; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public administration; Welfare; Social accounting; Not for profit; Public economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Economic growth; Management accounting","score_opus":0.06934170412982928,"score_gpt":0.33505417221771927,"score_spread":0.26571246808789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078112660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23121275,0.0010061061,0.19734879,0.14185047,0.00043147372,0.0005333968,0.000031842574,0.00023785263,0.4273473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855246,0.00012925867,0.0064673703,0.0014222924,0.000044025597,0.00008448864,0.0000049379196,0.000023827684,0.0062992857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95347756,0.03182081,0.00096564955,0.002441448,0.00688596,0.0044085383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95488626,0.02262402,0.0054461085,0.005964053,0.0069019333,0.0041775685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048839703,0.00027647484,0.00035716128,0.0015717197,0.011212881,0.014728932,0.0015833842,0.003972983,0.0015157956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041640837,0.00041009116,0.0004564795,0.0012631755,0.058513194,0.008770234,0.008659392,0.005999835,0.0002620606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001328652,0.000041378215,0.0027065757,0.000044156986,0.0000073140395,0.00012194276,0.026530568,0.00059105013,0.00049570843,0.9546311,0.0018147242,0.013002099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006208719,0.00014881618,0.005905003,0.00039378172,0.000018425806,0.00022199549,0.024307411,0.0035198964,0.0012435641,0.82192504,0.1421534,0.00010053104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039579317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05752388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048839703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018186307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047940675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25829214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088235380","doi":"10.1332/030557307779657757","title":"The social exclusion discourse: ideas and policy change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Thatcherism; Social exclusion; Sociology; Politics; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social policy; Political economy; Inequality; Social inequality; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.06738673365903126,"score_gpt":0.4520137281218146,"score_spread":0.38462699446278337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088235380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05494693,0.021927891,0.012012938,0.63862514,0.0023090357,0.000054372475,0.000053283602,0.000053468026,0.270017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614924,0.008735634,0.0022851257,0.016034052,0.0014673113,0.00012270776,0.00003177827,0.000044895478,0.009786031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97708976,0.017247364,0.00043132718,0.0012516412,0.0023906643,0.001589182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98182195,0.014763919,0.0010781736,0.0006000417,0.0008422128,0.0008936678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026150506,0.00075706997,0.0009235471,0.0044455975,0.016054964,0.024560895,0.0020596676,0.011765213,0.004850268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0199271,0.0003087125,0.00064345775,0.004904861,0.103725746,0.019082109,0.014070591,0.010318478,0.00047112518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004897937,0.000010498815,0.000098718,0.00002581434,0.0000018288871,0.000033189,0.011588327,0.00007445034,0.000027862781,0.9846867,0.0010332257,0.002414601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017716744,0.000015974058,0.0002974554,0.00032160006,0.0000054675156,0.000038688737,0.02543303,0.0003081276,0.00013703757,0.8582082,0.115202606,0.000014146671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00625655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037690557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026150506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021445164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014954515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15559626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091363693","doi":"10.1332/030557303765371681","title":"Process research in healthcare: towards three-dimensional learning","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Face (sociological concept); Relevance (law); Health care; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Process management; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.12416913153619288,"score_gpt":0.3990736793459938,"score_spread":0.2749045478098009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091363693","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053588455,0.003233308,0.9267724,0.025535828,0.0003535248,0.00033739395,0.00008518696,0.0003728863,0.037950583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15632915,0.0051660687,0.8303247,0.0021443863,0.00028744317,0.0013504465,0.00017095973,0.00016278267,0.004064009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96067,0.031513423,0.0018441791,0.0015018006,0.0038226913,0.00064787857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90483534,0.07235633,0.003374261,0.011160316,0.0053797723,0.0028940353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05337482,0.0011314119,0.0014470582,0.006222106,0.0041541504,0.02818393,0.004216629,0.0054380754,0.004069005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05992334,0.0010964365,0.0032235673,0.005179843,0.043903925,0.023220658,0.013994439,0.008334604,0.001204536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009240047,0.000046315774,0.00044758376,0.0002464258,0.000021422355,0.000063398955,0.010939731,0.002613083,0.00015705674,0.9625625,0.001483332,0.021409847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015792195,0.000016685419,0.00012761528,0.00027309885,0.0000075037865,0.00004190372,0.0029292777,0.004232253,0.00015728775,0.9602732,0.031908758,0.000016633023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038806368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05337482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008889687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013827715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28227633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144053226","doi":"10.1332/030557306777695325","title":"Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGOTM paradigm of an active society","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Paradigm shift; Preference; Convergence (economics); Architecture; Welfare state; State (computer science); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Epistemology; Law; History","score_opus":0.03631510506728202,"score_gpt":0.37501414622117846,"score_spread":0.33869904115389643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144053226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034482382,0.002463134,0.1650567,0.0843646,0.00079196686,0.00015646251,0.00012545478,0.00012808286,0.7124312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105926,0.0009777069,0.04262505,0.0060205464,0.00039870758,0.00048588117,0.00006498321,0.000087247885,0.038747266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633646,0.0022316172,0.000081645194,0.0003955947,0.0005468083,0.000407861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989054,0.00037266215,0.00013405508,0.00021535545,0.00016024003,0.00021213804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047111125,0.0004486311,0.0003753019,0.0016223668,0.003989124,0.008012679,0.0011705903,0.0034786623,0.005905686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027169746,0.00021992445,0.0007447937,0.0009646657,0.032099195,0.008694842,0.0051557375,0.0043855086,0.0012258546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001763154,0.0000015385222,0.000019416542,0.0000042347365,3.4882478e-7,0.0000051820343,0.00042268168,0.000038169885,0.000020167437,0.9985545,0.00025624374,0.00067557674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000542349,0.000009701899,0.00007075417,0.000022316719,9.156636e-7,0.000018193577,0.00039038318,0.0002801506,0.000035597932,0.97029793,0.02886464,0.000004045306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025688098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034701067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008012679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067697414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003457356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04911816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163790756","doi":"10.1332/030557312x655594","title":"Developing a better understanding of community foundations in the UK’s localisms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Localism; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Epistemic community; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.20554796161745612,"score_gpt":0.4092227141022789,"score_spread":0.20367475248482278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163790756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4389101,0.009605989,0.03193679,0.1353445,0.00058747357,0.00014085523,0.00013402228,0.00009187204,0.38324833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935353,0.0009819436,0.0011648267,0.0008791826,0.000022417722,0.000024621379,0.000011708485,0.000009570341,0.003370417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944036,0.004048734,0.00011401608,0.00024573185,0.0002888677,0.0008990157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299777,0.004192276,0.00072241935,0.00047855088,0.00058026606,0.0010287135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057700067,0.00023347865,0.00031950136,0.0017149012,0.0061314665,0.011431959,0.00088652427,0.003081207,0.005392416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068833344,0.00028299296,0.0002462009,0.0017150147,0.020972302,0.011466872,0.0078398455,0.0029296542,0.000436309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012312365,0.000017097742,0.0024933147,0.00013053062,0.0000035616458,0.000498619,0.16172619,0.0005595542,0.00018113173,0.8179687,0.0036930318,0.012715863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017149005,0.00005414399,0.008794282,0.0010738391,0.000009513733,0.00036216524,0.40292197,0.0015551462,0.00017555422,0.3060698,0.27891967,0.000046793277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060196552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09885125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060196552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016422454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010920442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119692326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315933676","doi":"10.1332/147084414x13992869118596","title":"From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: the new design orientation towards policy formulation research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":299,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Field (mathematics); Management science; Computer science; Design elements and principles; Human–computer interaction; Systems engineering; Political science; Engineering; Software engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5713815743657811,"score_gpt":0.56044765351476,"score_spread":0.010933920851021073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315933676","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012050266,0.04568583,0.79421073,0.07954101,0.0018180789,0.00054080173,0.00018758248,0.00050070626,0.06546495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3545519,0.0347512,0.59322107,0.007999403,0.00092252705,0.0029654019,0.00014405436,0.0005999965,0.0048444928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7540579,0.21777938,0.00815922,0.00554536,0.012826673,0.0016315435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65358955,0.3045317,0.007587557,0.024167595,0.007053151,0.003070481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1418625,0.0024790447,0.0038134959,0.014163342,0.0045769485,0.035980783,0.0050773383,0.0082796905,0.00765031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1512271,0.0028026202,0.0025604458,0.014621143,0.11089385,0.061344873,0.022676464,0.017985342,0.0018168533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023940534,0.000031093892,0.00030407004,0.0014028923,0.000033154778,0.000033436016,0.007938517,0.00091006217,0.00011044724,0.96745545,0.0009039674,0.020852875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047587808,0.00006660439,0.00017850117,0.0021531782,0.000024593666,0.000091031085,0.004592823,0.0015207605,0.0002800988,0.94703233,0.043964595,0.00004784163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002039771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022842155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1418625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014998565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018123994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75024956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316357077","doi":"10.1332/030557312x655602","title":"Familialism and migrant welfare policy: restrictions on social security provision for newly arrived immigrants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services; University of Sydney","keywords":"Immigration; Welfare; Scholarship; Social security; Social Welfare; Social policy; Welfare reform; Immigration policy; Welfare system; Political science; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.03612551565844544,"score_gpt":0.36499508405114284,"score_spread":0.3288695683926974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316357077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719876,0.0003351638,0.00050700345,0.0044823275,0.000017779099,0.000011243247,0.000036485628,0.0000037941168,0.022618618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.00010268311,0.00009025296,0.00017586998,0.000008493926,0.0000058869555,0.000009319292,0.0000011109913,0.00094842125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979395,0.0009550903,0.00007371112,0.00012063522,0.00023916547,0.000671799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973584,0.0007143425,0.0007752007,0.00016864859,0.00043529677,0.00054814335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023208505,0.00011137598,0.00015791015,0.0006177786,0.0040351925,0.0022617627,0.00044714086,0.0007041949,0.002064848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007117893,0.00011795316,0.00018612457,0.00056548935,0.0029517878,0.0010686493,0.0027190645,0.0012294966,0.000093701754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035730613,0.00020790394,0.3965996,0.00015940235,0.000090857735,0.001548555,0.105012245,0.004165646,0.0031431322,0.43065888,0.003148196,0.054908127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050854713,0.00034345975,0.75918996,0.00090607035,0.000100836194,0.00061356684,0.14730822,0.0027617526,0.0013321051,0.0321151,0.055199232,0.00007889839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11134223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21747212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11134223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006798304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007214404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22138828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322405743","doi":"10.1332/030557312x655936","title":"Managing poverty, managing dissent: homeless politics and collective action in London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Collective action; Poverty; Politics; Punitive damages; Opposition (politics); Social movement; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Political economy; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04773380645952823,"score_gpt":0.41733995407553515,"score_spread":0.3696061476160069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322405743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54390293,0.029174406,0.0018769265,0.10033679,0.00060186215,0.00009109414,0.000056996123,0.000047648387,0.32391137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701965,0.004176744,0.00026654167,0.0015939983,0.00007198701,0.000029319934,0.000010732791,0.000017832706,0.023636477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976291,0.0015996174,0.00007532739,0.000087936394,0.00018172029,0.00042636858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843353,0.00078184105,0.00029143388,0.00006433558,0.00007034778,0.00035840107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018730573,0.00022656632,0.00019230522,0.0011387288,0.008502772,0.006173115,0.0006648258,0.0022444895,0.005546802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022013518,0.00017784194,0.00013987035,0.0012054502,0.023461586,0.0036287592,0.00844136,0.0012992369,0.00051233894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111985464,0.00006231171,0.0057111555,0.00049625646,0.000018034814,0.002509734,0.68933725,0.00048888713,0.0008568992,0.24655268,0.016393185,0.037461575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034669032,0.00006621173,0.007438024,0.00042493554,0.00000764207,0.00037053906,0.66391194,0.00015388113,0.00029245793,0.03259865,0.29466933,0.000031676285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03874363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09667774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03874363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010954834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004262665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07948321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568985889","doi":"10.1332/030557316x14595273846060","title":"Citizens’ Initiative Review process: mediating emotions, promoting productive deliberation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Expression (computer science); Deliberative democracy; Political science; Democracy; Statement (logic); Process (computing); Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06114896904747234,"score_gpt":0.3994334229677089,"score_spread":0.33828445392023654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568985889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79634345,0.0011736894,0.029144358,0.02546675,0.0004705993,0.00042034956,0.00008473571,0.0003049764,0.14659105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932787,0.00013458668,0.0040938347,0.00084849127,0.00006507758,0.00020129538,0.000021902324,0.000041510702,0.0013145952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91093665,0.07897977,0.0012498786,0.0022664743,0.004021838,0.0025453668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.855991,0.117935926,0.013275229,0.004918867,0.003805835,0.0040730895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034430537,0.00044889608,0.00039105077,0.0019918573,0.0054993085,0.010439922,0.00084270973,0.0027877926,0.0032336572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107416555,0.0004381663,0.00055393815,0.001159005,0.00949762,0.006769466,0.008779482,0.0026913416,0.0006541306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008229511,0.00060690794,0.05523937,0.0010904307,0.00026408109,0.0016549643,0.6539709,0.0013630252,0.011592373,0.12280871,0.009307764,0.14127854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005648334,0.0009258931,0.07932626,0.0012752904,0.00034952755,0.000736116,0.4090191,0.0057269125,0.008625794,0.27704442,0.21602155,0.00038434815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010697907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018825335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034430537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021753544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005484627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18208826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585967196","doi":"10.1332/030557317x14860555458738","title":"Reconsidering the fiscal–social policy nexus: the case of social insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social insurance; Nexus (standard); Welfare state; Legitimacy; Restructuring; Social Welfare; Economics; Public economics; Economic system; Political science; Finance; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.16565969135259093,"score_gpt":0.4114363937464503,"score_spread":0.24577670239385938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585967196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21011053,0.0059489543,0.030441811,0.18806787,0.00050216354,0.00013983864,0.0000988963,0.00004503536,0.5646449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375595,0.0013531107,0.0029703653,0.0025112422,0.00018125452,0.0000867832,0.000012209055,0.000015723062,0.009113295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377644,0.0035035477,0.00011241077,0.00039507303,0.00067124213,0.0015412847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965275,0.0023347794,0.0002942454,0.00019578288,0.00025594854,0.00039163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008976457,0.0004874771,0.00092020223,0.0020114875,0.015088096,0.011941689,0.0017819961,0.0096759815,0.0060262317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062398775,0.00042661742,0.0009850689,0.0015900257,0.031737097,0.012546315,0.010438863,0.0071639176,0.00032505507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003789465,0.000006755864,0.00011794167,0.0000049132664,0.000001493944,0.00009252405,0.0009541416,0.00037747703,0.000018218057,0.9977597,0.00020448714,0.00045850454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036080346,0.000020041176,0.0004630295,0.00012147481,0.000011551144,0.00013002005,0.0067337924,0.0025733688,0.00017476632,0.9547099,0.035003863,0.000022103733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02684765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030740011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02684765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016100949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012597724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11682111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587621947","doi":"10.1332/030557316x14748942689774","title":"British Columbia’s fast ferries and Sydney’s Airport Link: partisan barriers to learning from policy failure","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Policy learning; Process (computing); Public policy; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.018078577176065133,"score_gpt":0.29786684986698575,"score_spread":0.2797882726909206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587621947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74791396,0.00027293235,0.0009232636,0.02523906,0.00009190903,0.000044074386,0.00012320951,0.000038866103,0.22535273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860318,0.0000896241,0.000115934214,0.0006475532,0.0000069026773,0.00000922586,0.000024284613,0.000011055247,0.013063564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744725,0.0006161647,0.00004121837,0.00018580747,0.00027936767,0.0014301067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920614,0.0029387579,0.0006114827,0.000500256,0.0013371437,0.002550897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029360196,0.00017846008,0.00035414455,0.0008030331,0.024681471,0.0065646134,0.0010793447,0.0031408793,0.017830784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012907355,0.00025236592,0.0001700677,0.0015643389,0.0063669845,0.0029863266,0.0038344245,0.003977373,0.0007434538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005176603,0.0005210956,0.13304903,0.00018058601,0.00007626248,0.007428374,0.27725676,0.005970602,0.0013781058,0.35082233,0.101917624,0.120881654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523732,0.000104363644,0.18898037,0.00044218617,0.00005630077,0.0005052622,0.4410123,0.0045880172,0.0011959961,0.05096478,0.31193498,0.00015008156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8526285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94236064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14737147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02212645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024431111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2964787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772283625","doi":"10.1332/030557317x15053060139376","title":"Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nudge theory; Incentive; Matching (statistics); Public economics; Focus (optics); Policy mix; Management science; Economics; Policy analysis; Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Microeconomics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0663821511405952,"score_gpt":0.34703333370318673,"score_spread":0.28065118256259153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772283625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08206491,0.0017046102,0.86098087,0.0071136667,0.00010429806,0.001329037,0.00009760359,0.00017220607,0.04643278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249908,0.0005914541,0.1708349,0.0004225328,0.000047065805,0.0014294432,0.000034722256,0.00008587337,0.0015632171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.850963,0.13071766,0.0033159873,0.005934421,0.00695722,0.00211166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8920702,0.08445112,0.007375433,0.010996754,0.0032799586,0.0018265333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09641311,0.001553301,0.0032957618,0.004803382,0.0025139516,0.012446692,0.0032552548,0.004719075,0.0065762755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15779959,0.0017273262,0.0013873593,0.0048651267,0.02326933,0.021896295,0.010522506,0.0040532793,0.00059032603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018227217,0.00015490217,0.004616135,0.0004017523,0.00013526097,0.0000545735,0.0035414302,0.021275658,0.0003694389,0.91893697,0.0002971143,0.0500346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084389154,0.00019878177,0.0013101555,0.000290089,0.00004748815,0.000030077314,0.0011409977,0.019330803,0.00045795995,0.9730305,0.004042354,0.000036457262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018455611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018954517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09641311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008135945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066735414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50988734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793691563","doi":"10.1332/030557318x15200933925397","title":"Austerity in the making: reconfiguring social policy through social impact bonds","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Transparency (behavior); Politics; Political science; Social policy; Political economy; Empirical evidence; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1577991416534026,"score_gpt":0.40102909795752284,"score_spread":0.24322995630412023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793691563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088917114,0.0030875213,0.10536038,0.1378078,0.0013951703,0.0002517647,0.00011201008,0.0002981349,0.66277015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975127,0.00084600627,0.010216488,0.003628236,0.00019336921,0.00013391726,0.000018414723,0.00007358215,0.009763016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884537,0.008003053,0.00027276957,0.00091029867,0.0014828224,0.0008773677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858064,0.006178422,0.0013839847,0.0017802188,0.0008024148,0.0012742244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014945857,0.00049698085,0.00046695513,0.0019239472,0.0049470584,0.011644403,0.001604222,0.0055999346,0.012136429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033085946,0.0004339733,0.0005516449,0.0012854285,0.041483928,0.0136728,0.013278829,0.007092666,0.00094933284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012762502,0.000020627229,0.00030798605,0.000027098056,0.000007019962,0.00003302842,0.0015194899,0.0005491047,0.000095777206,0.9871043,0.0014733133,0.008849424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011941787,0.000023526653,0.0005538334,0.00012144017,0.000007139647,0.000025273412,0.0012297378,0.00060188526,0.00019780626,0.96592486,0.031287357,0.0000153586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002049843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031910418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014945857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050318767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050212857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07904214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885881976","doi":"10.1332/030557318x15333033508220","title":"Is it time to give up on evidence-based policy? Four answers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; GRASP; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Task (project management); Political science; Public relations; Discipline; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Economics; Management; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.4824637774321112,"score_gpt":0.5706544681213398,"score_spread":0.08819069068922858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885881976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010757239,0.059209097,0.0047577065,0.9203981,0.01210942,0.000058665406,0.00015144494,0.00006350094,0.00217631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10607276,0.16588151,0.03378443,0.65178084,0.036379494,0.0010225138,0.0007676371,0.0002533367,0.0040574097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91950107,0.04231098,0.010896531,0.007089514,0.015563848,0.0046380726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5769839,0.3339886,0.022661068,0.01203063,0.03610989,0.01822588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12111605,0.0017988519,0.005236131,0.005994281,0.0053688316,0.019055668,0.0043607317,0.024940636,0.023224834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3218565,0.0014281403,0.002695502,0.007843118,0.029616645,0.055718154,0.01451262,0.034077007,0.00488971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009446143,0.00047247566,0.003988267,0.020873865,0.0009329065,0.00071755436,0.007550493,0.0013611874,0.0010148436,0.37851754,0.23103309,0.3525932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002497575,0.00016353923,0.001881659,0.023872746,0.00022834093,0.00041137994,0.024019163,0.00047907044,0.00025435523,0.6925817,0.25563198,0.0002262172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027757357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027488046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87888396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009426578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032035198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6405306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904898488","doi":"10.1332/030557318x15407315707251","title":"The effects of welfare state universalism on migrant integration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Welfare state; Welfare; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.015131718880669956,"score_gpt":0.3375957738534095,"score_spread":0.32246405497273956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904898488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8527468,0.0007717977,0.0038770656,0.010530296,0.000052820837,0.000051627274,0.00009050713,0.000026046791,0.13185294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983878,0.000096898264,0.00018409871,0.0002959911,0.000006342238,0.000010487602,0.000010237634,0.0000039573288,0.0010042312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292785,0.0025581701,0.00020261249,0.0007942266,0.0008382491,0.0026788013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952478,0.0014872362,0.0011661501,0.0004686554,0.0006936855,0.0009365276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061634663,0.00020582815,0.0004467263,0.0010012797,0.0060876897,0.0039645857,0.00086654397,0.0013416519,0.007438058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012740233,0.00021696734,0.00069202215,0.0012802626,0.012708897,0.0029827226,0.01204594,0.0020923754,0.00017932097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022244175,0.00015332161,0.06134956,0.00013246363,0.0001071019,0.0005325803,0.03485963,0.0017684739,0.00094905536,0.8721137,0.001050723,0.026760863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023981724,0.0003840526,0.36962682,0.00085306284,0.00047379866,0.00046364436,0.13799287,0.0035525616,0.0023821832,0.4242625,0.059637617,0.00013103396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078765035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09275579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078765035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010251524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069260066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15661317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972363115","doi":"10.1332/030557319x15613699681219","title":"Challenges in applying design thinking to public policy: dealing with the varieties of policy formulation and their vicissitudes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Variety (cybernetics); Public policy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Management science; Design thinking; Policy studies; Product (mathematics); Product design; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07830923547365505,"score_gpt":0.2810519324378748,"score_spread":0.20274269696421976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972363115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011537137,0.03414527,0.3581171,0.46690357,0.0031192037,0.0004777914,0.00007300879,0.00024374043,0.12538323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5940321,0.030202663,0.3134278,0.043751046,0.0033097137,0.0027470447,0.000090735455,0.0005369087,0.011902045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79742396,0.16869265,0.005421068,0.0065191835,0.018011672,0.0039314805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8077224,0.16232009,0.0050797737,0.014697228,0.007570447,0.0026101347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14714894,0.002239261,0.003249384,0.0062577897,0.013391313,0.043176528,0.00802109,0.017672446,0.0035497118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099747725,0.0021972593,0.0023988124,0.0055975243,0.16662171,0.04311125,0.019111268,0.024956062,0.0011609973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010030573,0.000022691005,0.00014739833,0.00027001504,0.000025163094,0.00006767464,0.0075397985,0.0010120409,0.000049867613,0.97936535,0.001459744,0.010030272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001563079,0.000016045704,0.000044974473,0.0004991596,0.0000081772005,0.00007658738,0.003911481,0.0007079998,0.00008700306,0.9708265,0.023784546,0.000021800814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003951716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040834458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14714894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022757899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025353637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77820724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015122099","doi":"10.1332/030557320x15837138808157","title":"Improving the political judgement of citizens: why the task environment matters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Politics; Framing (construction); Task (project management); Political efficacy; Political science; Public relations; Political communication; Cognition; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.054487380078616074,"score_gpt":0.3275600760962464,"score_spread":0.2730726960176303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015122099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610362,0.00023316022,0.0032345897,0.003986456,0.000051341845,0.00005046706,0.000045890083,0.000019886776,0.031342033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987577,0.00005189888,0.0005467666,0.0001974054,0.000012816444,0.000019400539,0.000022545617,0.000008939422,0.0003824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867208,0.009821045,0.00038214112,0.00063942786,0.0013146228,0.0011220099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622081,0.02595485,0.003950039,0.002896217,0.0026442315,0.0023465648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012517601,0.00030973754,0.00041256775,0.0007700822,0.0027215497,0.0070440634,0.00047111468,0.0011903498,0.0045053125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049503457,0.0002307178,0.0003291684,0.00072370796,0.005021698,0.0031931251,0.00254469,0.0017064997,0.00088008697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012779124,0.001316476,0.53065383,0.0012046759,0.00024033093,0.00056326063,0.17808264,0.0020157276,0.012448064,0.057700142,0.0077420324,0.20675482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013660887,0.00071736565,0.76722926,0.0005746453,0.00010297863,0.0002649586,0.11518061,0.0039383294,0.0050073466,0.07066855,0.036010146,0.00016920341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003148585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043770783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012517601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013284448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012066718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0662002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185199073","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16239357875918","title":"Institutional logics as a framework for understanding third sector development: an analysis of Quebec and Scotland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Welfare state; Political science; Context (archaeology); Solidarity; Nationalism; Public administration; Civil society; Economic system; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Geography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11787435761818792,"score_gpt":0.39422345237740225,"score_spread":0.2763490947592143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185199073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7763139,0.001014276,0.0034425545,0.0068905316,0.000029602488,0.00016715942,0.00036742666,0.000045913508,0.2117287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938951,0.00018364766,0.0005206557,0.0001952713,0.0000025373338,0.000028835746,0.000079389676,0.000009988898,0.005084655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977628,0.0005472596,0.00003496182,0.000098781755,0.00029760602,0.0012586064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996549,0.00093652547,0.0004552977,0.00017289426,0.001037379,0.0008488002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017472751,0.00025597203,0.0003064189,0.0035633384,0.009816721,0.0071016075,0.0016262672,0.00080367265,0.006371155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035979012,0.0001821539,0.00048057773,0.004594891,0.010225146,0.002241108,0.003458015,0.0011263175,0.00018042342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093873794,0.000138395,0.07421935,0.000112205205,0.000047321973,0.0022905278,0.063788354,0.0053988425,0.00091085664,0.8166359,0.00529102,0.031073285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108955304,0.00012366097,0.2950233,0.00086999394,0.00012033507,0.0005003701,0.38966918,0.014302529,0.0010985233,0.06899771,0.22900881,0.00017666195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98562616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13078919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13078919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060383644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9489464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226236954","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16476244758073","title":"The impact of direct democracy on policy change: insights from European citizens’ initiatives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Veto; Political science; Democracy; Scholarship; Politics; Direct democracy; Ideal (ethics); Foreign policy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05435375045884908,"score_gpt":0.3658436116901435,"score_spread":0.3114898612312944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226236954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82228625,0.00105802,0.0020802924,0.0049084467,0.000029159064,0.00006179253,0.00009868204,0.000012836603,0.16946456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986021,0.00027255397,0.00027338232,0.00019055133,0.0000064178435,0.000028633132,0.000026566182,0.0000055478436,0.00059424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910328,0.0060214247,0.00027607795,0.0004867837,0.0008533956,0.0013294361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854188,0.011160933,0.0012781796,0.0007926073,0.000693237,0.00065626885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010911793,0.00021607403,0.0005171332,0.002179375,0.0029710692,0.006964178,0.0007025784,0.0019559136,0.0033689125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015421281,0.00016731721,0.00053847325,0.00463784,0.007363716,0.004605242,0.0059528016,0.0019065449,0.00017526344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002648022,0.0005758142,0.067099966,0.00045547396,0.00010744702,0.0012142372,0.111514226,0.0038479436,0.00094681734,0.7487233,0.0024091792,0.06284085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018192433,0.00059703726,0.23358355,0.0013286475,0.00021637305,0.000548996,0.28073454,0.0065517793,0.0027841667,0.306363,0.16700408,0.000106049556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036570204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050783623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010911793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045957346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031805115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057707787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281615866","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16485722290035","title":"Transforming public policy with engaged scholarship: better together","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Guelph; York University; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Transformative learning; Public engagement; Public policy; Public relations; Power (physics); Political science; Indigenous; Community engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.0419951652104941,"score_gpt":0.3406112483008874,"score_spread":0.2986160830903933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281615866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030766718,0.010235007,0.0644743,0.6155884,0.0040625865,0.00057299086,0.00006949288,0.0005046731,0.2737259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84210145,0.01031465,0.05108438,0.05601919,0.0023474996,0.0011150237,0.00017085767,0.0006667944,0.036180153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8791709,0.097952,0.0023173126,0.004031837,0.007887557,0.008640436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91024405,0.05731232,0.002751426,0.0123387,0.006393686,0.010959729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08866088,0.0015011587,0.0026336059,0.0062815296,0.04157401,0.05819852,0.005777019,0.019928612,0.015485877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.083592094,0.0012118008,0.0021274297,0.006403184,0.09395943,0.059520535,0.05746568,0.032595836,0.0035720125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042326847,0.00029173706,0.001218958,0.00046734032,0.00005120245,0.00064155046,0.28352058,0.000673065,0.00039878258,0.6430838,0.014170804,0.055439845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027706603,0.00008092721,0.00036734864,0.0013429994,0.000026368807,0.00016164393,0.1559063,0.00033702314,0.00029961625,0.5860066,0.25538996,0.000053563843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012327691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015579208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.958426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024451224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072676465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46888918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283770254","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16528864819376","title":"New pathways to paradigm change in public policy: combining insights from policy design, mix and feedback","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Policy mix; Transformative learning; Policy studies; Policy analysis; Public policy; Politics; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.12141262153287502,"score_gpt":0.34565129405278994,"score_spread":0.22423867251991492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283770254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09976756,0.00823351,0.49904636,0.15004349,0.0005861577,0.0006846006,0.00022305993,0.0007235004,0.2406919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92372847,0.0027555455,0.066936105,0.0024483756,0.00013257336,0.0005880313,0.000072636445,0.00024015621,0.0030981533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489277,0.039099313,0.0014161832,0.002713444,0.0052259676,0.002617412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92517084,0.056603763,0.004450201,0.0069823624,0.004127566,0.0026653428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05297163,0.0018345943,0.0016912001,0.0083078975,0.0072572483,0.03351553,0.0037951476,0.007842376,0.0077106166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05259278,0.0013763917,0.0016608285,0.005241437,0.059991803,0.055293366,0.019943103,0.012104844,0.0009640956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061749146,0.000119317025,0.0016377664,0.00039794305,0.000042950072,0.00013355649,0.019434884,0.0039641773,0.0003194414,0.9488918,0.0007742667,0.024221977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002046641,0.000036963094,0.00036596262,0.00031877874,0.000019793828,0.000045352313,0.008873398,0.0027188798,0.00040029405,0.97523105,0.011942388,0.000026653803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030868675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036535903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05297163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02868111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02385405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2801441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283774250","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16521053190029","title":"A future research agenda for transformational urban policy studies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Political science; Urban politics; Politics; Political economy; Transformational leadership; Oppression; Public administration; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Public relations","score_opus":0.16284103328914992,"score_gpt":0.3746271092236248,"score_spread":0.21178607593447488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283774250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005528468,0.05719384,0.020595606,0.802099,0.004451913,0.00026404203,0.0004002123,0.0001614058,0.109305486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55507076,0.15493733,0.08866497,0.14685601,0.010890837,0.0030272785,0.0015806973,0.00034072457,0.03863134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831025,0.0122637255,0.00039360073,0.0009081789,0.0013824218,0.0019495197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91737014,0.061515495,0.0026196043,0.0046509183,0.0071200184,0.006723798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03232258,0.0009783971,0.0022161554,0.0040045492,0.0051067597,0.016062152,0.0042674337,0.009128893,0.037687883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033782814,0.00049638975,0.0017323509,0.008153557,0.016541893,0.026551258,0.008271418,0.011587768,0.0027664893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042475353,0.0002736551,0.0009901897,0.0006556264,0.000025851255,0.000055367775,0.001816677,0.0010454169,0.000049003942,0.94050133,0.028591901,0.025952468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036747955,0.000053466734,0.0011432946,0.0021985718,0.000022465525,0.00003560521,0.018832985,0.001665124,0.0000901004,0.7633819,0.21250606,0.00003364556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068834294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010490893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037687883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014165799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03408738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17094022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313537609","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16569341758199","title":"Advocacy coalitions, power and policy change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Status quo; Veto; Jurisdiction; Scholarship; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Causality (physics); Public administration; Public economics; Public relations; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07982133109769289,"score_gpt":0.4138934286772529,"score_spread":0.33407209757955997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313537609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08426557,0.0070285182,0.035909466,0.10617879,0.0007044896,0.00028347736,0.00010327795,0.00010912185,0.76541716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97983414,0.0016032873,0.0034004839,0.0026487906,0.0001313587,0.00010449553,0.000033067805,0.00002571855,0.0122185545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867975,0.0053422637,0.00030946024,0.001377263,0.003056524,0.003116886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837916,0.010098379,0.0019116453,0.0010131171,0.0014344945,0.0017507855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018593458,0.00058888627,0.00067389116,0.005462051,0.013192296,0.010021264,0.0019263075,0.004776095,0.011641829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03265236,0.00035835514,0.0006256519,0.0043275203,0.051446397,0.010110921,0.012101599,0.0049267937,0.00065792294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006569898,0.000016068543,0.0009891946,0.000039312876,0.0000061391383,0.00007116016,0.004561596,0.00036783665,0.00004016973,0.98490566,0.00095524604,0.008041079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033661494,0.00002209898,0.0029711549,0.00029128496,0.000012776182,0.00008800496,0.0105495835,0.0009614522,0.0001792586,0.8723114,0.112552434,0.00002687675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12026234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093568064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12026234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03141772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039177906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23912466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323922440","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16764537061954","title":"The role of charitable funding in the provision of public services: the case of the English and Welsh National Health Service","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Welsh; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Pluralism (philosophy); Public administration; Service (business); Political science; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08341175601012703,"score_gpt":0.4511423409307736,"score_spread":0.3677305849206466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323922440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8465746,0.001663193,0.0011064714,0.057881616,0.00026022494,0.0000719651,0.00014316992,0.000016486609,0.09228215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930038,0.00038741608,0.00022517558,0.0013863976,0.00005058501,0.000031180283,0.000032047927,0.000011661167,0.0048717544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697651,0.020660466,0.0005129117,0.00064876216,0.0021652605,0.0062474236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733975,0.022195347,0.0026806928,0.0012977974,0.002284897,0.0042014807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020054951,0.00026297418,0.00040770293,0.0023006508,0.01812379,0.011783999,0.0014832782,0.0022035954,0.005471181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03281381,0.0003635341,0.00032017494,0.0055619013,0.018969081,0.007323593,0.010481923,0.0032114354,0.00032298753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014065564,0.00009335605,0.025015714,0.00036101812,0.000024759025,0.0043028044,0.69726354,0.00043800793,0.00026220555,0.23071691,0.013082358,0.028298656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023711053,0.000051495485,0.025008855,0.0008135913,0.000024255736,0.00070319057,0.81428343,0.0004082439,0.000180316,0.015285638,0.14315982,0.000057385598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18973207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26112655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18973207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027567675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029297529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37725544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379114729","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16831146677554","title":"Analysing the ‘follow the science’ rhetoric of government responses to COVID-19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Blame; Slogan; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Rhetoric; Political science; Newspaper; Corporate governance; Public opinion; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.0813914327867281,"score_gpt":0.41979185829308435,"score_spread":0.33840042550635624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379114729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6172526,0.00517483,0.016243163,0.16765463,0.0014024191,0.0001681966,0.00014619961,0.00013028772,0.1918277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988861,0.00078663154,0.0012267078,0.0060143005,0.00013584796,0.00007814748,0.0000292091,0.00007348772,0.002794759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682331,0.024824625,0.000522606,0.0010864252,0.003811308,0.0015218235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87089187,0.11429006,0.007116143,0.0024048765,0.0041675684,0.0011295361],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02451688,0.00050995813,0.00043429525,0.0031974777,0.014503457,0.009271902,0.001411172,0.005925637,0.002558711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073267356,0.0004864151,0.00031185139,0.002686342,0.031836,0.007989163,0.0060899286,0.008492716,0.00040469458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063526255,0.00003803864,0.0032527924,0.00031838796,0.0000144277665,0.00051935524,0.81754,0.00021412772,0.00063227833,0.1571993,0.008144089,0.012063614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029123074,0.00007085507,0.00789987,0.001457867,0.000028438022,0.0003149885,0.69580513,0.0010376975,0.0013610104,0.052742988,0.23917654,0.0000755341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008535554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116253095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013483389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051317737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12965924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390658537","doi":"10.1332/030557321x16841388707452","title":"Types of learning and varieties of innovation: how does policy learning enable policy innovation?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Policy learning; Entrepreneurship; Innovation process; Business; Process (computing); Political science; Knowledge management; Marketing; Computer science; Work in process; Geography","score_opus":0.025825078054099358,"score_gpt":0.35810944568231357,"score_spread":0.33228436762821423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390658537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44473946,0.0057199197,0.120973036,0.056544386,0.00035060183,0.00046706625,0.0006945896,0.0002807848,0.37023014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899361,0.0010849005,0.0059454697,0.0005899894,0.000098899225,0.0001367364,0.00006432507,0.00003097571,0.002112582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833292,0.008935033,0.0007060129,0.0021026756,0.0023748162,0.0025522588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279867,0.05308672,0.007124191,0.0062657315,0.002596862,0.0029397462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014293974,0.00047940575,0.0011739966,0.0049142353,0.0033125815,0.014317522,0.001993143,0.0039476953,0.01035154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053227425,0.00048906956,0.0016323577,0.005152266,0.02241626,0.025382841,0.00945681,0.004742417,0.0009237042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012516853,0.00014721294,0.018815603,0.00026988387,0.000043452867,0.00015542516,0.0043163607,0.0032190394,0.00027101766,0.9340629,0.0007307484,0.03784312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027054182,0.000049901162,0.009653158,0.00027088766,0.000029605217,0.0001344137,0.0058213514,0.004606507,0.00048162168,0.96763444,0.01125143,0.00003956058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022697558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017929572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014317522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076888916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044331695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07559466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390901437","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2023d000000024","title":"Emotions and anti-carceral advocacy in Canada: ‘All of the anger this creates in our bodies is also a tool to kill us’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Denunciation; Anger; Indigenous; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0398154010459476,"score_gpt":0.3840765112940183,"score_spread":0.3442611102480707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390901437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7956745,0.004702482,0.0006752682,0.073959835,0.0006355589,0.00007319618,0.00010729538,0.000035993853,0.1241359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850209,0.0012574887,0.00021669411,0.0039528324,0.000030883133,0.000016707934,0.000021562844,0.000021057476,0.009461895],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444914,0.0014293274,0.00007428011,0.0003574314,0.0013250862,0.002364604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463177,0.0011244033,0.00060347735,0.00010618376,0.001044247,0.0024898727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035680449,0.0004567354,0.00043194124,0.0012909306,0.050207745,0.011590985,0.0018827987,0.0030190742,0.0045147534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006492599,0.00041206484,0.0004134834,0.0020301917,0.031914365,0.0021805638,0.0069033345,0.008089498,0.0003141641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006964995,0.000100351615,0.022231782,0.00014312491,0.000028323671,0.0008302872,0.9111416,0.00015561568,0.0006525002,0.025629107,0.017836034,0.021181708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001090553,0.000022053446,0.024139639,0.00023218727,0.000021621263,0.00015139897,0.879799,0.00014686945,0.00022644256,0.0018833014,0.09329617,0.00007036102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99341375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1201914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1201914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13680488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87205374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396946771","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2024d000000035","title":"A theory of policy advisory system quality: Hirschman 2.0 or what makes for good policy advice?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Quality (philosophy); Public economics; Economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11442770885243334,"score_gpt":0.47764752042483777,"score_spread":0.36321981157240446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396946771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035201617,0.00692542,0.30737492,0.14837189,0.0010159442,0.00051346753,0.00032418617,0.00072489853,0.49954772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999129,0.0024603934,0.06990912,0.0058500166,0.0009927568,0.00045125245,0.0001273706,0.0002494404,0.020046733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700684,0.015437892,0.0011881298,0.0028244557,0.007609594,0.0028714936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91226345,0.059874035,0.008601411,0.005945735,0.00995408,0.003361327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028059905,0.0007396667,0.0009832736,0.0063041523,0.0057891016,0.013539351,0.002997864,0.007368688,0.010613194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088675044,0.00091118045,0.0011658064,0.006472017,0.035623483,0.016204156,0.0047295317,0.005675675,0.0013844807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001147872,0.000013716315,0.00069186575,0.000054665958,0.000008701915,0.000021804566,0.001652842,0.00089056854,0.000026830001,0.9867126,0.0026859227,0.0072289733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025196403,0.000018164737,0.00068225694,0.000110072455,0.000014072568,0.000032385913,0.0005799601,0.0034698837,0.00007673407,0.9727323,0.022238998,0.000019979914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019408513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008747695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028059905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016471844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016229771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14839673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402255105","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2024d000000050","title":"Developing a theory of robust democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Democracy; Interdependence; Political science; Politics; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Economic system; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.12382070550317914,"score_gpt":0.41967548630120854,"score_spread":0.2958547807980294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402255105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021576341,0.0016443237,0.43228218,0.032770876,0.0004766173,0.00018292866,0.00015276107,0.00018589116,0.5107281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89757824,0.001510392,0.06616608,0.0027332404,0.0003957091,0.00049751945,0.00014400356,0.000114484035,0.030860372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927108,0.0047031483,0.00017868927,0.0007330058,0.0010807882,0.00059347285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449086,0.003364808,0.00043088046,0.0008999984,0.0005412459,0.00027219215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081901485,0.00041145942,0.0005319476,0.00172902,0.002649728,0.0053377724,0.0014363246,0.0023904627,0.008899886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010873298,0.0003386369,0.00092624093,0.0014077331,0.015639832,0.0069544893,0.005282118,0.0042602774,0.0014331241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0241826e-7,0.0000032310122,0.00004454273,0.0000066631114,0.0000015547398,0.000010239367,0.00021326054,0.0007851986,0.000014309384,0.99734133,0.00039828525,0.001180517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003776153,0.0000053940985,0.00006351121,0.00002154438,0.0000016158887,0.000012250311,0.00016531377,0.0019790381,0.000040810777,0.98556757,0.012136139,0.0000030279166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022538085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015292568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008899886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004294053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003532229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04331422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406091039","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2024d000000064","title":"Why did the influence of experts erode during the COVID-19 pandemic?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Betacoronavirus; Virology; Environmental health; Medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine","score_opus":0.05106471700094065,"score_gpt":0.4099220893052461,"score_spread":0.3588573723043054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406091039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8327085,0.0013124319,0.005201175,0.09226269,0.0003695119,0.00012251943,0.0003782916,0.00003524813,0.06760967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996488,0.00026265052,0.00033601103,0.001928233,0.00003902704,0.000016158489,0.00002912475,0.0000068751883,0.0008939136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797586,0.012651393,0.00039783245,0.0013066791,0.0031543688,0.0027311728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455285,0.035558973,0.00579647,0.0017292013,0.008055542,0.003331221],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030579915,0.00027619264,0.0004806538,0.001376758,0.004535225,0.0071510887,0.0011714592,0.0026515624,0.0037409023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094649546,0.00028658728,0.00029307848,0.0011855373,0.005091645,0.004359438,0.003223693,0.0037633732,0.00038976283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011070485,0.00031889076,0.38926327,0.0005861354,0.00040938714,0.0018330519,0.3155443,0.006914957,0.002270052,0.08615456,0.023648655,0.17194957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011617639,0.00029133243,0.36034882,0.0010850384,0.000196914,0.00034412587,0.47324088,0.0077989255,0.0018726061,0.07111864,0.08325568,0.0003308885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27726737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3405492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018026656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015305857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55130696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408097659","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2025d000000065","title":"What is successful policy experimentation?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for Canadian Studies in the United Kingdom","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.14098322508892044,"score_gpt":0.5144076319604024,"score_spread":0.37342440687148193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408097659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10072864,0.030241398,0.076562144,0.43529588,0.0037610438,0.0020442393,0.0004638906,0.0004919122,0.35041088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482769,0.0059102965,0.020732153,0.016644377,0.0011942844,0.002350653,0.00012028313,0.00020290901,0.004568234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80380094,0.14579208,0.006492192,0.008769464,0.025577448,0.009567786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48003337,0.43183455,0.024131503,0.026424471,0.021601355,0.015974762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17606686,0.0010126512,0.0020481425,0.0032329164,0.008235677,0.025106328,0.002827731,0.0117819235,0.007885909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30988663,0.00068694545,0.0012325781,0.0029356468,0.05068165,0.026372219,0.010258537,0.0075059584,0.0015534719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026041456,0.00046494033,0.013512462,0.002933658,0.00019535498,0.00044977068,0.009323248,0.00226141,0.00058314437,0.8708683,0.009634169,0.08951309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013694611,0.00044334287,0.0058268597,0.0034516486,0.00008920589,0.000271644,0.012674863,0.0014438902,0.0015093754,0.87758267,0.09644193,0.00012754912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002679785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024772556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17606686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0120201865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029633207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9311417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410736419","doi":"10.1332/03055736y2025d000000071","title":"How do populist discourses influence policy termination?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy & Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.01829298398744894,"score_gpt":0.4045230304006908,"score_spread":0.3862300464132419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410736419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4560499,0.007058,0.013644437,0.13853976,0.00096145,0.00023392787,0.00015406447,0.000094710165,0.38326377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99149585,0.0009982081,0.0007027529,0.0028516743,0.000118078,0.000060655286,0.000031049018,0.00005757923,0.0036842888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613872,0.021140976,0.0009920546,0.0026899956,0.008422511,0.0053672357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94501203,0.03767676,0.006683701,0.0020969154,0.0050738673,0.003456797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04731106,0.00071427575,0.0010475442,0.004714687,0.02239987,0.02468592,0.002674672,0.0060097505,0.0050243596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07570836,0.00076900783,0.0007693043,0.004540438,0.075495385,0.011558106,0.013936242,0.010831013,0.0006477939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005956028,0.00004429087,0.012116101,0.00021864695,0.000042214142,0.00038745804,0.62852615,0.00020137879,0.00042830003,0.34280968,0.0027824999,0.01238371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096498996,0.000061034483,0.019780628,0.0012388461,0.000083981664,0.00015273727,0.51934093,0.0007475196,0.0008079216,0.22461297,0.23294201,0.0001349763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10303594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08645968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10303594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051914096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036508307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37666488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}