{"meta":{"query_hash":"de3b3d862b2f","filters":{"venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de3b3d862b2f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Policy+Reviews+in+Higher+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2595906047","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2016.1246065","title":"Fiscal incentives, Clark’s triangle, and the shape and shaping of higher education systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; State (computer science); Balance (ability); Convergence (economics); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Public administration; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10105881395089192,"score_gpt":0.4185060993920384,"score_spread":0.31744728544114653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595906047","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28748825,0.3185907,0.0000037939903,0.17600797,0.011772769,0.0045246803,0.000010608307,0.000044074757,0.20155713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92001075,0.029664012,0.00020782897,0.0013364195,0.0017513898,0.00046884446,0.000006723265,0.000011930022,0.04654208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829,0.0004813416,0.00052217965,0.0002584097,0.00023394686,0.00021413511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985716,0.00014532276,0.0007012598,0.00037707298,0.00010303695,0.0001017189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015356442,0.00013804495,0.0003684325,0.000119672695,0.0005274948,0.00025075077,0.00032159965,0.00009705892,0.00019415026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038863817,0.000103347826,0.00004760087,0.00023637706,0.00047353917,0.0004344905,0.00006434472,0.00012390463,0.00001625548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029759798,0.00023609675,0.09614954,0.0003082234,0.00001773844,6.981813e-8,0.01646945,2.556894e-7,0.000016077265,0.7313263,0.024996696,0.13044982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023692736,0.0000035318521,0.4370359,0.00032771798,0.000011843611,3.748077e-7,0.00025094647,0.0000012235025,0.0000013798316,0.0023186917,0.559733,0.00007846851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011778351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021164991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7290076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002314479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011352979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778998364","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2017.1396556","title":"Differentiating universities: some insights from organization studies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Skills Training","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07172573879949574,"score_gpt":0.32723727268126174,"score_spread":0.255511533881766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778998364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80619615,0.06210633,0.00005753542,0.031707197,0.0069054984,0.0014492233,0.000004375593,0.0002477744,0.091325894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796781,0.0054530003,0.00012931437,0.0031663636,0.0055072056,0.000025802143,0.00010807473,0.00002526156,0.0059068673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991636,0.000018307019,0.00029462785,0.00024316834,0.00013742974,0.00014285301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989529,0.000030321255,0.0004904731,0.00033726887,0.00018063973,0.000008399684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000089852336,0.00016837099,0.00027163324,0.00027727982,0.00063676614,0.00032440215,0.00035077718,0.0000383326,0.00042390893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003502529,0.00014880307,0.000033514727,0.00040405852,0.000055597207,0.0018082886,0.00034627577,0.00006369971,0.00037614035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031281907,0.00013522935,0.19659586,0.0004718138,0.00006468214,6.763232e-7,0.0007902726,0.0000044401295,0.00006722236,0.7763892,0.01992294,0.0055545354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022434891,0.0000017005492,0.7144641,0.00041000638,0.00007099179,3.643422e-8,0.0006851306,0.000011855587,0.000013925482,0.057070628,0.22681406,0.00023319731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001702507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016156676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71931857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020020618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004612316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6068013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794557027","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2018.1455532","title":"Exploring the potential contribution of college bachelor degree programs in Ontario to reducing social inequality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Bachelor; Mandate; Equity (law); Limiting; Inequality; Political science; Social mobility; Baccalaureate Degree; Higher education; Historically black colleges and universities; Public administration; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.41417215426157855,"score_gpt":0.4751105365191509,"score_spread":0.060938382257572365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794557027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9411676,0.0005546878,0.0000063872294,0.042184465,0.001556889,0.0022680145,0.0000034881198,0.000020198157,0.0122383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274576,0.00034057096,0.0003029294,0.00031626032,0.002098515,0.0015613202,0.000010165851,0.000009290423,0.002615201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700665,0.0011398154,0.00067153067,0.0002816797,0.00041854064,0.00048176933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888575,0.00011593656,0.00022591525,0.00025175032,0.00041575875,0.000104889295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034567,0.00013529463,0.00033837164,0.00029492116,0.00042855408,0.000048744158,0.00037191794,0.000062088286,0.0002455798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009947022,0.000111050314,0.00007632305,0.002051182,0.00034128517,0.0003076038,0.00008337435,0.00023832456,0.0000619885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089210684,0.0013365698,0.20108096,0.00014713155,0.000032809265,4.8123724e-7,0.3292198,0.0000014292842,0.00039073318,0.17390555,0.009182006,0.28461334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073875,0.000028613855,0.7130201,0.00014378643,0.0000064615774,1.0961479e-7,0.0022443722,1.4584141e-7,0.000027280435,0.0008285468,0.28350353,0.00008969759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38535744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39660615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5119391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020214533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022581294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61873555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981341004","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2019.1679662","title":"Student pathways and differentiation policies in Ontario: are they compatible?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Public relations; Political science; Diversity (politics); Policy development; Policy studies; Policy analysis; Public economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.06809523464727711,"score_gpt":0.3738849776441849,"score_spread":0.30578974299690775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981341004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620568,0.0025402596,4.068954e-7,0.0058798855,0.0010354758,0.0008168753,0.000001138354,0.00001428069,0.027654853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810868,0.0033922705,0.00011046301,0.0012782081,0.00025004917,0.00022271046,0.000012202569,0.000008436807,0.01363887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856424,0.00025099114,0.00042527757,0.00024278276,0.00025615483,0.00026057215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993584,0.000056206864,0.00026032925,0.00019473991,0.00004989261,0.00008042219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051257235,0.00013242077,0.0002769657,0.00024196075,0.00008552985,0.00008620283,0.00016780412,0.000070565715,0.0005410747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000457312,0.00012259853,0.00003145292,0.0004007194,0.000032670257,0.00025667265,0.00003253926,0.00014486887,0.00015821312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017736528,0.00020051244,0.88479525,0.000026192844,0.0000020705259,4.8425974e-8,0.060490638,0.0000016958243,0.000013460169,0.05136833,0.0010255647,0.0020744607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121337056,0.0000059864474,0.7467998,0.0001622056,0.000002395201,1.0463796e-7,0.0012334954,1.9125912e-7,0.0000020946054,0.002409235,0.2491584,0.000104747094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31935945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47826216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24813284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001339862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010722895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.685173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286216312","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2022.2096106","title":"Ideal immigrants in name only? Shifting constructions and divergent discourses on the international student-immigration policy nexus in Australia, Canada, and Germany","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Nexus (standard); Ideal (ethics); Immigration policy; Ideal type; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04895507260393435,"score_gpt":0.4033446881511448,"score_spread":0.3543896155472105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286216312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326263,0.0020040758,8.781168e-8,0.062542126,0.0011688372,0.0004070533,0.000012070938,0.0000043416203,0.0012350889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99087805,0.0035800443,0.000010966519,0.0017614659,0.00045357313,0.00025619497,0.000012946137,0.0000049704295,0.0030417745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985146,0.00033781672,0.00039286906,0.00022166295,0.0003022049,0.00023088173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954367,0.0000959347,0.0001578194,0.00010759784,0.000021473707,0.000073517775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006547724,0.000110450994,0.00016054558,0.0002988985,0.00038499315,0.00008923823,0.00022964482,0.000030212963,0.0003649731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012690791,0.00008711624,0.000024416919,0.00057558285,0.00014738443,0.00016844629,0.00005925549,0.00020452544,0.000002415097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014558295,0.0005184816,0.55295414,0.000019071756,0.00000992588,0.0000011266488,0.112096906,0.00003852061,0.000021607553,0.28801838,0.0037858852,0.04252137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019836555,0.000017794193,0.6682835,0.0000850022,0.0000033911865,0.0000025688917,0.04356019,0.000006394732,0.000001397265,0.00140927,0.28630796,0.00012411237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9142914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8953628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2866091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066895585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013089016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39961994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587442","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2023.2209655","title":"From rejection to acceptance: the institutionalization of adopting university ranking outcomes as policy and strategic tools in China since the 1980s","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ranking (information retrieval); Institutionalisation; China; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0943847924259508,"score_gpt":0.40542988949929715,"score_spread":0.3110450970733464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376587442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8868735,0.0012806746,0.000013821462,0.08583437,0.0008480167,0.0010212279,0.000007558418,0.000029771229,0.0240911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885316,0.005977525,0.00018720805,0.0011746428,0.00059460494,0.000050570987,0.000017206145,0.0000051343027,0.0031399573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987296,0.00036887501,0.00030629357,0.0001859152,0.00023229419,0.00017700954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.000216311,0.00021093713,0.00017478749,0.000058074987,0.00004169716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095996604,0.00009097842,0.00015939615,0.00023540536,0.0003002415,0.00006539604,0.00023333989,0.00005194474,0.0000611898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063140976,0.00006670481,0.000031369746,0.002901716,0.00009555914,0.00031129576,0.00004091449,0.000099611934,0.0000348528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008149438,0.000057776622,0.080653064,0.000027882228,0.0000056735676,1.7021429e-7,0.049790706,0.00013346455,0.000025080415,0.84115076,0.0007232419,0.027424024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007492864,0.000003241722,0.70615387,0.00014386784,0.000003827725,1.1604023e-7,0.0026728201,0.0000020522757,0.0000035061084,0.010171505,0.2807056,0.000064694665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06382737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006115668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016594095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94240665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}