{"meta":{"query_hash":"de3b3d862b2f","filters":{"venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de3b3d862b2f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Policy+Reviews+in+Higher+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2595906047","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2016.1246065","title":"Fiscal incentives, Clark’s triangle, and the shape and shaping of higher education systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; State (computer science); Balance (ability); Convergence (economics); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Public administration; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10105881395089192,"score_gpt":0.4185060993920384,"score_spread":0.31744728544114653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595906047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19726478,0.0107564125,0.14325094,0.13576736,0.0009526107,0.00021622077,0.00023718066,0.00022255705,0.5113319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984359,0.0013392235,0.00780473,0.0010494647,0.00011368952,0.000075672404,0.000025788504,0.0000330121,0.005199425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992018,0.0042037116,0.00025901725,0.0010632972,0.0014717225,0.0009843762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946154,0.0023530687,0.0008904444,0.00079556275,0.0007445811,0.00060088834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065116687,0.00039039634,0.0005007364,0.0022635488,0.003969654,0.009253904,0.0011923977,0.0024815272,0.0043098642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012434191,0.00033076614,0.00051866006,0.0031540992,0.03213327,0.009606961,0.0055605224,0.0025474182,0.00033584988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060069938,0.0000023252148,0.00028993457,0.00001064921,0.0000013052072,0.00001131328,0.00068622536,0.00029427692,0.000028183724,0.995369,0.00041102726,0.0028896527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011124967,0.000011479634,0.0005560432,0.000037536563,0.0000019555514,0.000033347016,0.0011862501,0.00069869123,0.00006810788,0.9709819,0.02640304,0.000010427007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010022361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007023169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010022361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009439499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006815009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06848866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778998364","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2017.1396556","title":"Differentiating universities: some insights from organization studies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Skills Training","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07172573879949574,"score_gpt":0.32723727268126174,"score_spread":0.255511533881766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778998364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15373933,0.17737097,0.0155989425,0.111649014,0.00046706962,0.000081613085,0.0001626651,0.00005065172,0.5408798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183064,0.06549878,0.0036392715,0.0025561815,0.00043716494,0.000051115727,0.00006789711,0.000022682423,0.00942056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963576,0.0023473785,0.00012691284,0.00014883943,0.00048762164,0.0005315541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103516,0.006387199,0.0007552253,0.00044016307,0.0008085503,0.0005737241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049303556,0.00028526815,0.00045041132,0.0042483453,0.0036763407,0.0069750687,0.0010745042,0.0018838018,0.0025096068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051534246,0.00020027644,0.00034332456,0.0056897225,0.01421379,0.005807623,0.0028415394,0.0014527183,0.0002580561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013422512,0.00003997542,0.00388958,0.0002446702,0.000008653588,0.00031551238,0.029743925,0.000562271,0.000088673696,0.939029,0.0038058066,0.022258513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019263392,0.00004766889,0.017020974,0.0012355171,0.000017822336,0.0003876838,0.04629329,0.001308876,0.0001915192,0.57224184,0.36120802,0.000027514885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07575528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09430989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07575528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014307815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005059854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15062869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794557027","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2018.1455532","title":"Exploring the potential contribution of college bachelor degree programs in Ontario to reducing social inequality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Bachelor; Mandate; Equity (law); Limiting; Inequality; Political science; Social mobility; Baccalaureate Degree; Higher education; Historically black colleges and universities; Public administration; Public relations; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.41417215426157855,"score_gpt":0.4751105365191509,"score_spread":0.060938382257572365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794557027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90569025,0.0011543761,0.00044748007,0.018054664,0.000055554287,0.00028443805,0.00030651432,0.000015528287,0.07399105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369884,0.0006957501,0.00033442647,0.0006503031,0.00001553591,0.00005028304,0.00005780802,0.000003439993,0.004493615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692327,0.000610948,0.000037951613,0.000109637695,0.0005221456,0.0017960254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525225,0.00097450236,0.00044318254,0.00013021723,0.0010446025,0.0021552313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020089545,0.00017170918,0.00028854702,0.00077609916,0.0061998754,0.00215723,0.0012457027,0.00071125606,0.0033359844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008348831,0.00016664658,0.00025457816,0.0018576663,0.0025208928,0.0008064347,0.0017581418,0.000789017,0.00010707456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001349925,0.0010130904,0.5087335,0.001179084,0.00014813934,0.0008960653,0.067839794,0.004892288,0.0039853756,0.091262326,0.023607733,0.29509258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018136094,0.00040077293,0.86605984,0.00045242338,0.000113265494,0.000055891367,0.052803665,0.001869566,0.0008148337,0.004124683,0.07308333,0.000040411716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8994892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1005108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18209592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7292603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981341004","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2019.1679662","title":"Student pathways and differentiation policies in Ontario: are they compatible?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Public relations; Political science; Diversity (politics); Policy development; Policy studies; Policy analysis; Public economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.06809523464727711,"score_gpt":0.3738849776441849,"score_spread":0.30578974299690775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981341004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4356799,0.021326054,0.0043361494,0.2190057,0.0004915301,0.0004551371,0.0017833307,0.00012580787,0.31679636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95529133,0.009754746,0.002742884,0.004519242,0.00005324394,0.00010143867,0.00027556828,0.00002981956,0.027231634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917142,0.0014997579,0.0005425085,0.00050513755,0.00328665,0.0024516978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98288363,0.0048320196,0.002191901,0.0007459569,0.005943605,0.0034028855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067875884,0.00014976498,0.00032862372,0.0020198422,0.010127931,0.00753566,0.0014533305,0.0014544798,0.0033465694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017090507,0.00032318622,0.00030769437,0.0077519305,0.008918837,0.0037275054,0.0031731639,0.0013339905,0.0001884065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018669662,0.00006525789,0.078517735,0.0024230024,0.00006463856,0.0010342308,0.11928333,0.001954697,0.0015196092,0.5707431,0.030275827,0.19393186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056740526,0.00006790479,0.15681164,0.0021294437,0.00007757619,0.00022501704,0.15359226,0.0008078591,0.0010435543,0.035539586,0.6494933,0.0001552109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98337525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99351245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80585927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19414075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3374983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9346825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286216312","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2022.2096106","title":"Ideal immigrants in name only? Shifting constructions and divergent discourses on the international student-immigration policy nexus in Australia, Canada, and Germany","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Nexus (standard); Ideal (ethics); Immigration policy; Ideal type; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04895507260393435,"score_gpt":0.4033446881511448,"score_spread":0.3543896155472105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286216312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122968,0.022209164,0.00069588947,0.027239464,0.00034711926,0.000043625063,0.00008071832,0.000013044369,0.0370742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98922193,0.007290347,0.0002698097,0.001589051,0.00002605848,0.000022624676,0.000030266157,0.000011731507,0.0015381258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211735,0.0045270165,0.0003719058,0.0005123218,0.0013555727,0.0011157402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899985,0.0062219137,0.0010094015,0.00027351783,0.0015129203,0.0009837191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016527774,0.00048608994,0.0008243172,0.003915082,0.015965188,0.014409114,0.0015314099,0.0023262005,0.0013131564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015787851,0.0003511859,0.000313473,0.0049865716,0.030428588,0.007041442,0.0067896326,0.0031976511,0.00009463591],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022581351,0.000008606675,0.0027983494,0.0002612506,0.000010323904,0.00033025545,0.9564872,0.00003252818,0.00014410906,0.03163175,0.0010627105,0.0072104093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029700461,0.0000069295706,0.0028934134,0.0009499658,0.000015651454,0.000067828085,0.97407913,0.000037420592,0.00011586386,0.0012760721,0.020536523,0.000018237444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6607688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69566923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3392312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043518033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06739081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.682458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587442","doi":"10.1080/23322969.2023.2209655","title":"From rejection to acceptance: the institutionalization of adopting university ranking outcomes as policy and strategic tools in China since the 1980s","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Reviews in Higher Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ranking (information retrieval); Institutionalisation; China; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0943847924259508,"score_gpt":0.40542988949929715,"score_spread":0.3110450970733464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376587442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955225,0.0009336397,0.0016660211,0.006408934,0.00006379015,0.000058740632,0.00006731905,0.0000304359,0.03554624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847776,0.00016957242,0.00012139049,0.00013334706,0.0000115134735,0.000012213685,0.000015504409,0.000003926647,0.0010546733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862097,0.006438107,0.00079735956,0.0009829719,0.0031317635,0.0024401671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733107,0.01417799,0.0051981327,0.0017487914,0.0040302323,0.0015341302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020962778,0.00022789223,0.00036039262,0.0021507065,0.003973985,0.0061355736,0.001013994,0.0009620883,0.0022119053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02465204,0.00024003263,0.00024207168,0.0030331553,0.009507372,0.0035752708,0.0035852238,0.001709697,0.00011590641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032798326,0.00018235041,0.2611542,0.00075308344,0.0000806386,0.0024562408,0.27424487,0.0017160191,0.0040333187,0.29323006,0.0055365786,0.15628469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052415868,0.0003625639,0.636434,0.00063850667,0.00009039651,0.0002933367,0.19427799,0.0044560945,0.0051049218,0.042164225,0.11583977,0.0002858187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049588125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051034696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011118452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019617746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11086309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}