{"meta":{"query_hash":"e81b6b93d24f","filters":{"venue":"Polish Sociological Review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e81b6b93d24f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Polish+Sociological+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2190640083","doi":"","title":"A Genealogy of Sociological Theories - An Attempt at General Reflection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Sociological imagination; Perspective (graphical); Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24858515316169777,"score_gpt":0.47859184273068806,"score_spread":0.23000668956899029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190640083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6326191,0.08379775,0.00012220225,0.018420942,0.0006350081,0.00078033906,0.00007187835,0.00027069548,0.2632821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93697715,0.045238554,0.0003970189,0.012982592,0.0014652212,0.00006800815,0.00003517512,0.000012104063,0.002824161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652934,0.0016830966,0.0004516065,0.00033471306,0.0003932352,0.0006080278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847263,0.00036558104,0.0002300281,0.00023309489,0.00023285997,0.00046582153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296559,0.00016940835,0.0006234018,0.000015565762,0.0002889172,0.000015764503,0.00041799303,0.00036432655,0.0006078306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421481,0.000118229145,0.000215504,0.000169438,0.0018122065,0.00015467899,0.00013522553,0.000249358,0.00011218796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023832294,0.00007789375,0.005739937,0.00008306183,0.000015335278,0.000003650625,0.0021345257,3.7309684e-7,0.00008226166,0.98230076,0.0071476595,0.0023907248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029064875,0.00046789582,0.013133688,0.00014840355,0.000060617684,0.000005476148,0.0004938885,0.0000047072094,0.000040289422,0.25043538,0.7345948,0.00032417747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012831148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016711853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73186535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030297847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023555881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.667715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542045846","doi":"","title":"The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Poland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political communication; Democracy; Sociology; Political culture; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.20692220845204667,"score_gpt":0.45703101572032356,"score_spread":0.2501088072682769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542045846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07431799,0.16011155,0.000044467135,0.13411896,0.0005864478,0.0012145108,0.000014042192,0.00007539902,0.62951666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92588973,0.07161906,0.000012948262,0.0015249815,0.00025592642,0.000045210832,0.0000010695816,0.0000042277397,0.0006468395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976511,0.00095291156,0.00031759514,0.00019918375,0.00017272236,0.0007064756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.0010263133,0.000046690857,0.00013877364,0.000050316958,0.00016751786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018248472,0.00008770089,0.00021791887,0.00002640136,0.00018627281,0.000026163838,0.00025753383,0.00013247192,0.00015673685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002074837,0.000040085488,0.0000934702,0.00017009326,0.00057653204,0.000059789894,0.00006447225,0.0001531636,0.00013983007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012275004,0.00003851811,0.02956216,0.00004199361,0.000002793392,0.0000025597876,0.0007211395,1.2523668e-8,0.0000051959187,0.9614061,0.0024136596,0.0058046365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003399494,0.00001969112,0.27860618,0.00043022004,0.000010196555,0.0000014839859,0.0017930833,0.0000010055904,0.000002298127,0.4115552,0.3070618,0.0001789072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080526486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071867305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85157174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021627237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016720699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24839236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W780005616","doi":"","title":"On a Classic Thinker, Classically","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Sociology; Narrative; Polity; Reading (process); Greenwich; Brother; Classics; Media studies; Law; Art history; Literature; History; Anthropology; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.05176967140973258,"score_gpt":0.38128703676792747,"score_spread":0.32951736535819487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W780005616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016863933,0.031226767,0.00025661165,0.080359384,0.0008082862,0.0008126077,0.000009260293,0.0005406025,0.86912256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6965059,0.16776016,0.00039956914,0.1298518,0.0018496743,0.0001525103,0.000024854879,0.000024209565,0.0034312902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958801,0.0023057952,0.00037662932,0.0004085536,0.00036614522,0.0006627505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968566,0.0022816085,0.00015788748,0.00029359444,0.00010178859,0.0003085633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028299938,0.0001950977,0.00062164146,0.000023697481,0.000580668,0.000032355165,0.0005631335,0.00047179827,0.0015487495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010033591,0.00013676062,0.00033758767,0.00018093044,0.0012676291,0.00007147396,0.000071132585,0.000595134,0.0013007388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030965207,0.000056393576,0.00033323315,0.00007390715,0.000010424036,0.0000018623833,0.00061509816,1.3850288e-7,0.0000026446826,0.89071524,0.09180398,0.016383981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013754379,0.0001576983,0.0016235004,0.0003423141,0.000028637407,6.148694e-7,0.00013217979,0.0000032098073,3.7227372e-7,0.1793903,0.8179891,0.00019452018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007844878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003239151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86569124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012710261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012364841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W793223501","doi":"","title":"Foreigners in the Polish Academic System at the Beginning of the 21st Century. A Quantitative Analysis of Their Employment According to the Official Documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Social Issues in Poland","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Prestige; Christian ministry; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Social science; Law; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0764819433747585,"score_gpt":0.41419629596230856,"score_spread":0.33771435258755006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W793223501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8674572,0.062090993,0.00003720546,0.031308744,0.00066167087,0.003479403,0.00010415006,0.00005089927,0.03480973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764221,0.01906805,0.000012961333,0.0040596644,0.0002667116,0.00012633664,0.000005596888,0.000009034142,0.000029545241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930032,0.0046531893,0.00075456133,0.00029273485,0.0007718241,0.00052450405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948662,0.003744363,0.0006940005,0.00049113354,0.00013485661,0.000069478265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007914573,0.00020568124,0.0008160275,0.00005817835,0.00085441873,0.00004168416,0.0020562306,0.00019360756,0.000045838893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004975606,0.0000781717,0.00058087584,0.0019429415,0.0012130928,0.00008033336,0.00044443118,0.0004988101,0.000009383477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030552485,0.00006659047,0.120396815,0.00031018702,0.00063213403,5.1351753e-7,0.16008647,0.00011239068,0.00002420008,0.7069699,0.002897251,0.008472996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004204828,0.00020339951,0.096994884,0.0032709483,0.002499299,0.0000013015507,0.60892177,0.00010432471,0.000027684284,0.0061480715,0.28085208,0.0005557866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041943365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012215668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7008218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036184664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008339663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65715843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W895497371","doi":"","title":"On the Difficulty of Being Fair: A Review of Grzegorz Lissowski's Principles of Distributive Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Publishing; Distributive property; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.239707243681051,"score_gpt":0.4599497563652715,"score_spread":0.22024251268422051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W895497371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012564776,0.93252784,0.000014795478,0.005036281,0.00014192416,0.0017920398,0.00052140694,0.000029540004,0.05993492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056179013,0.99539095,0.000028158436,0.0032724594,0.00039734476,0.00013938936,0.00011516997,0.000019022942,0.00007569631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011755,0.0054926462,0.002316086,0.00048608604,0.0009470897,0.00064056966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807238,0.01534344,0.002378441,0.0007166293,0.00058309856,0.00025459653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075960243,0.000504094,0.0051559764,0.000037157166,0.00029196127,0.000010699207,0.0015810803,0.0007908034,0.0003566156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07913279,0.00026042375,0.0022728,0.000621003,0.0034308003,0.000054697088,0.00032166438,0.0013595917,0.000041133237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010364222,0.00007497473,3.6831662e-7,0.31171626,0.000069772796,6.4109435e-7,0.00011264813,1.5894768e-8,1.7422183e-8,0.66338235,0.0015433547,0.023098556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025308245,0.00007518013,0.0000038511166,0.33989027,0.001969746,6.6792205e-7,0.000032450156,6.7661404e-8,1.633065e-7,0.034108717,0.6237159,0.00017771988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009632647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037534242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62927365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018130377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006284997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}