{"meta":{"query_hash":"e81b6b93d24f","filters":{"venue":"Polish Sociological Review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e81b6b93d24f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Polish+Sociological+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2190640083","doi":"","title":"A Genealogy of Sociological Theories - An Attempt at General Reflection","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Sociological imagination; Perspective (graphical); Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24858515316169777,"score_gpt":0.47859184273068806,"score_spread":0.23000668956899029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190640083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07011537,0.025037572,0.22089384,0.14775603,0.0022551543,0.0001799278,0.00027832997,0.00037297164,0.53311086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341064,0.007925639,0.03726487,0.0045987507,0.001506713,0.0002648736,0.0001859539,0.00028280047,0.01386388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478406,0.0036271634,0.00011954016,0.000574429,0.0006848832,0.00020993802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884057,0.00817224,0.00047895435,0.0017407538,0.000972112,0.00023032898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009330433,0.00057521503,0.00067183847,0.0055741235,0.00436273,0.009285697,0.0017810964,0.002116536,0.0047203447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015570398,0.0005083062,0.0005313141,0.003502979,0.043652248,0.019422218,0.0042269947,0.006451983,0.00056689035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044150647,0.000007014035,0.0001614715,0.000018227513,0.0000063773864,0.000031759133,0.0032184937,0.0002894888,0.000025586638,0.9912043,0.0011436245,0.003889267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046341383,0.000007542795,0.00014153315,0.000061055034,0.0000035608787,0.00004776573,0.0018538907,0.000873976,0.000055974746,0.9680734,0.028871583,0.0000050499402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023410043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001182477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009330433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055381213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019369296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04934466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542045846","doi":"","title":"The Gender Gap in Political Knowledge in Poland","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political communication; Democracy; Sociology; Political culture; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.20692220845204667,"score_gpt":0.45703101572032356,"score_spread":0.2501088072682769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542045846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862536,0.0006503549,0.00026490138,0.0005902989,0.0000063026105,0.000013662504,0.000330114,0.0000027568512,0.0118879145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989073,0.00021727438,0.00009038128,0.000031056927,0.0000047709896,0.000012404899,0.00007886181,0.0000010306128,0.0006570063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893934,0.00019098636,0.00010356897,0.00020293548,0.00031236222,0.000250753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963624,0.001637419,0.001443944,0.00014296299,0.00020477353,0.0002085703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014048845,0.0001334592,0.00041016602,0.001905342,0.0009402349,0.0019826472,0.0002654547,0.0002553845,0.0074247345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053505953,0.00016295176,0.00018067098,0.0023668772,0.001404934,0.0014911771,0.0020414188,0.00044969618,0.00030669948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012971721,0.000111228255,0.8794704,0.000311608,0.000068626985,0.00038716698,0.04043649,0.00025734346,0.00057582394,0.013916303,0.0012465419,0.06308877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060490893,0.00004937606,0.9644509,0.00018052677,0.000018258988,0.00014382969,0.022385051,0.00018167998,0.00019549702,0.0043620267,0.008017393,0.000009299507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004639414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054699206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074247345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009407502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085299613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02483821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W780005616","doi":"","title":"On a Classic Thinker, Classically","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Sociology; Narrative; Polity; Reading (process); Greenwich; Brother; Classics; Media studies; Law; Art history; Literature; History; Anthropology; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.05176967140973258,"score_gpt":0.38128703676792747,"score_spread":0.32951736535819487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W780005616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003537673,0.20232753,0.010460865,0.35921326,0.04572879,0.000076038625,0.00029704487,0.0004937296,0.37786517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110428296,0.06034993,0.010241265,0.12821443,0.036212616,0.00020031394,0.00032599422,0.0008573921,0.65316975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702305,0.0011798881,0.000104188584,0.0005478794,0.0009011428,0.00024375829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967235,0.0013230126,0.00027247038,0.00031781464,0.0010366584,0.00032651794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027311447,0.0010365705,0.0006914058,0.0024664938,0.0045155655,0.011805809,0.001618384,0.0035172426,0.015144575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011080434,0.00036690998,0.00050453475,0.0020494373,0.016143449,0.013152434,0.0033931339,0.006382579,0.008558023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003952091,0.000016359285,0.00013974281,0.00017560268,0.000006806161,0.00010529867,0.005950224,0.00007104842,0.00022445213,0.2990741,0.659053,0.035143774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031434906,0.0000060843677,0.000064253836,0.00015481756,0.00000203388,0.000062039784,0.001198537,0.000032807508,0.00006869084,0.031428907,0.9669721,0.0000065719414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010474135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007936616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015144575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069196136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056433827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05066371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W793223501","doi":"","title":"Foreigners in the Polish Academic System at the Beginning of the 21st Century. A Quantitative Analysis of Their Employment According to the Official Documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Social Issues in Poland","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Prestige; Christian ministry; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Social science; Law; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0764819433747585,"score_gpt":0.41419629596230856,"score_spread":0.33771435258755006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W793223501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99480504,0.00046991635,0.00014483964,0.0001364744,0.0000058780447,0.000009652886,0.0011439886,0.000003925272,0.0032801696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965184,0.00036343586,0.00021629552,0.000019642921,0.000012102033,0.000020286816,0.001197837,0.0000043758737,0.0016476504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845076,0.00030418328,0.0003275067,0.00023941536,0.00046918768,0.00020883014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949361,0.0012040247,0.0022264223,0.00025276918,0.0010255357,0.00035506792],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015924786,0.00012665452,0.00020139264,0.005237798,0.00045823798,0.0017225926,0.00025307023,0.00023605228,0.0026340028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005913112,0.00011559481,0.00014017342,0.008072328,0.00052131194,0.001373586,0.0011887742,0.0002840014,0.0006277616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011261493,0.000046920497,0.94437,0.00015045174,0.000051371335,0.00017590563,0.019493472,0.00020440176,0.00057957787,0.0027166873,0.0013603328,0.030738184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031569548,0.00004134379,0.97298175,0.00004452587,0.00001519522,0.000124769,0.019082483,0.00017819404,0.0003000051,0.00018146061,0.007038509,0.000008457671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005446887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050608963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007641452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006532659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010830343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W895497371","doi":"","title":"On the Difficulty of Being Fair: A Review of Grzegorz Lissowski's Principles of Distributive Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Publishing; Distributive property; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.239707243681051,"score_gpt":0.4599497563652715,"score_spread":0.22024251268422051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W895497371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000109568566,0.97844565,0.0005432836,0.014657003,0.0011710068,0.000010338401,0.000015874703,0.0000060952552,0.0050411136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045546484,0.977081,0.0008055622,0.011670886,0.0035249712,0.00004856119,0.000045575533,0.00002553461,0.0022432161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896515,0.0040797745,0.0010535839,0.0008132836,0.0044982117,0.0005899613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97974294,0.014744399,0.001121546,0.0004917146,0.0035114943,0.00038784646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013583211,0.0016297067,0.002781606,0.009794951,0.0030715899,0.010657246,0.0031896876,0.0074833254,0.0028350279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021818627,0.0012507639,0.0011529602,0.013915996,0.01781807,0.019613218,0.0050053117,0.013802815,0.0017382081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040684936,0.000079585254,0.00030211778,0.006742256,0.00008625742,0.00017859475,0.002817685,0.00068197737,0.00015457791,0.4160371,0.3214254,0.25145367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009417199,0.000025439875,0.00085635314,0.0125148725,0.000023833773,0.00022560598,0.0007350209,0.00014044686,0.000099584984,0.08394529,0.90138376,0.000040421928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010564256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122317355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013583211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012651582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016611988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09179407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}