{"meta":{"query_hash":"8191d8b205e7","filters":{"venue":"Political Psychology"},"cohort_total":90,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":90,"exported":90,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8191d8b205e7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1484635786","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00849.x","title":"Priming and the Obama Effect on Public Evaluations of the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.165075033907701,"score_gpt":0.4596539816547078,"score_spread":0.29457894774700677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484635786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97660905,0.0001941052,0.00022736608,0.00023295956,0.000034615023,0.000025015173,0.000028741972,0.000010613224,0.022637626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988661,0.00009012958,0.00018173351,0.000075519536,0.000021490905,0.000013071927,0.000017560267,0.0000062166573,0.000728241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.00047961043,0.000026468282,0.0001143511,0.00022682021,0.000108965476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98638666,0.009345048,0.00230839,0.00049440237,0.00074364495,0.00072187703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017759731,0.00027772418,0.00021647222,0.000645052,0.0012432365,0.0011411319,0.00016659113,0.0005636007,0.0062839948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013850109,0.00025441896,0.00020935005,0.00040357158,0.0011676602,0.00074216584,0.001017375,0.0009455393,0.0003543009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017497642,0.0037053588,0.37233183,0.0011735788,0.00020977756,0.0018828913,0.08666291,0.0009851133,0.33136326,0.032474905,0.0038568198,0.14785585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014236073,0.0011433347,0.96071345,0.00011154847,0.00014221648,0.00040198388,0.009271271,0.0005837513,0.018085072,0.003291992,0.00603744,0.00007563007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009350655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012511667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009350655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009885503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006321776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021022081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495686792","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00864.x","title":"Where To From Here for the Psychology of Social Change? Future Directions for Theory and Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Australian Research Council","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Process (computing); Social change; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1520846094926072,"score_gpt":0.4843382461714507,"score_spread":0.33225363667884356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495686792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016434649,0.113316916,0.01603158,0.85222507,0.004771373,0.00020622673,0.000083377665,0.00018258639,0.011539502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2688444,0.3761662,0.13952594,0.18662558,0.015886039,0.0038288455,0.00035289698,0.0003531426,0.008416952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95854074,0.032278962,0.0013610569,0.0024058819,0.0029319131,0.0024814883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8223177,0.13981476,0.004211119,0.010485809,0.012576048,0.010594595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0950208,0.0024703508,0.006416923,0.008517011,0.010158921,0.029427094,0.009173431,0.020983163,0.025822707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07598065,0.0015305331,0.003442665,0.011103987,0.054821122,0.067701735,0.013613028,0.02778247,0.004164021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020742028,0.00058722385,0.0019890787,0.005357343,0.00016539953,0.0002702303,0.014310947,0.0012140148,0.00016670107,0.7667186,0.053305566,0.15570743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007585608,0.00009047452,0.00065968797,0.007906583,0.000052836924,0.00008365834,0.036918327,0.001017856,0.00009515419,0.8678162,0.08519334,0.00008992982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152783375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016941259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0950208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02174563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051573474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.502524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507761640","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00835.x","title":"Deliberation from Within: Changing One's Mind During an Interview","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of New Brunswick; Université de Montréal","funders":"One Mind","keywords":"Deliberation; Preference; Voting; Public opinion; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Structuring; Survey data collection; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.2667424962938361,"score_gpt":0.4378307916517717,"score_spread":0.17108829535793557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507761640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475546,0.00030998111,0.031324677,0.0062802974,0.00019045165,0.00029376397,0.00005992061,0.00007672022,0.013909598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889964,0.00015031155,0.0069676614,0.0014142938,0.0000569055,0.00028762754,0.0000580241,0.000020155914,0.0020486782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91634583,0.07564579,0.001492163,0.0020100833,0.0025075686,0.0019985558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90045047,0.07966368,0.0076044807,0.0052216025,0.004895281,0.0021646265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032148246,0.00041100287,0.0005784555,0.0012566778,0.0032915385,0.0037906126,0.00093959284,0.001253335,0.0019451911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10961546,0.00048803084,0.00052885886,0.0007043298,0.0048394515,0.002877463,0.0043613426,0.003016075,0.00064419495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006201937,0.0002592285,0.03227117,0.0003466486,0.000084882675,0.00050131103,0.86249834,0.0003501608,0.015623888,0.009696107,0.0017866597,0.07596142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011417156,0.00092176173,0.05223055,0.0006445022,0.00015120459,0.0009848896,0.81989145,0.0036700133,0.014520516,0.03856311,0.06804478,0.00026303285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008908826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011484682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032148246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015331301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017642546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1700182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510812856","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00829.x","title":"Why Intelligence Fails: Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War – By Robert Jervis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Iraq war; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08596943166365235,"score_gpt":0.38284453194288753,"score_spread":0.2968751002792352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510812856","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0094750095,0.05290076,0.00023671241,0.9005772,0.003760933,0.000005557601,0.000026952432,0.000015569043,0.033001296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50853974,0.103700705,0.00087106857,0.33638844,0.016623812,0.00003221749,0.000086362816,0.0001268258,0.033630855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988757,0.00051300373,0.000026391948,0.000096116724,0.00019047708,0.00029828766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641705,0.0023050734,0.0002687164,0.000107024876,0.00051328697,0.00038893463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034246675,0.0005788802,0.00045138507,0.00077538955,0.0045523094,0.0054368894,0.0011296624,0.004746326,0.0031446875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008131794,0.00025097877,0.00032092456,0.0011464095,0.011358924,0.0049936366,0.0021531754,0.010242384,0.000661374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008557713,0.000103841034,0.0031441501,0.00017490795,0.0000841939,0.0004205731,0.016908344,0.00042788358,0.00014912907,0.13554908,0.7707766,0.07217563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004506895,0.00003153728,0.00783919,0.0006782616,0.000035313715,0.0002522126,0.02972902,0.00027738558,0.00017476748,0.22465575,0.7362272,0.00005435737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024435574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043407053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024435574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028787313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043547982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048586726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539703311","doi":"10.1111/pops.12094","title":"What Can Political Psychology Learn from Implicit Measures? Empirical Evidence and New Directions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Voting; Voting behavior; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Implicit attitude; Political psychology; Empirical research; Psychological research; Cognitive psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.21744308714837343,"score_gpt":0.4891905812418564,"score_spread":0.271747494093483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539703311","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0315821,0.7538279,0.036565535,0.14185877,0.004937504,0.00026180554,0.0010791429,0.00015997117,0.029727235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29780552,0.5948909,0.047838468,0.037525974,0.015879208,0.000681621,0.0012920671,0.00020806602,0.003878088],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813643,0.009899288,0.0012870119,0.0030380883,0.003877003,0.00053435046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60346407,0.32966515,0.014654166,0.025088977,0.024480779,0.0026468781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06562684,0.0024061883,0.004972575,0.007039822,0.0014628014,0.008631826,0.0059977933,0.0060047023,0.015744852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1897944,0.0016472536,0.0021767488,0.007289605,0.014542732,0.029567996,0.004822597,0.0106296,0.00255833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079483737,0.00091002183,0.048772182,0.014795966,0.0019508518,0.00027515998,0.002630506,0.0013466289,0.0005217786,0.16597591,0.013919112,0.74810696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024815815,0.00062847725,0.083327346,0.030584307,0.001351595,0.0005262228,0.0044465563,0.004090061,0.0010830589,0.7612155,0.11211381,0.0003848317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007733386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058578947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06562684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026977395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046484093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34707206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606951780","doi":"10.1111/pops.12029","title":"Expectations Among Aboriginal Peoples in <scp>C</scp>anada Regarding the Potential Impacts of a Government Apology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Pessimism; Social psychology; Government (linguistics); Perception; Psychology; Population; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Theology","score_opus":0.010871878976413132,"score_gpt":0.3293216449253788,"score_spread":0.3184497659489657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606951780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99856746,0.00003632544,0.000011846326,0.00029812023,0.00000557529,0.0000069976963,0.000010721684,7.580878e-7,0.0010620554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990901,0.000060708462,0.000032599004,0.000109058994,0.0000046776163,0.000010147182,0.000012915548,6.882536e-7,0.00067926774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931467,0.00021826598,0.000031585543,0.000038979364,0.000150451,0.00024607117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972475,0.00044050286,0.00063990545,0.00006378482,0.00049426756,0.0011138968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015407453,0.00018121272,0.00019229515,0.00045105556,0.002819474,0.001678117,0.0003646721,0.0006075873,0.0021716633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003879056,0.00022858295,0.0002983988,0.0003202934,0.001547659,0.00052262895,0.0010414778,0.0015526001,0.000397382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017220227,0.0003080264,0.4649575,0.00009493701,0.000026099662,0.00116258,0.5216622,0.000079785794,0.0015238659,0.00073438603,0.0012185941,0.008059886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014022719,0.00029488062,0.40550306,0.00009143316,0.000020316242,0.00024797456,0.59042484,0.0002270169,0.00016983382,0.00033069262,0.0026475966,0.000028317381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18274127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23657757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8172587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024593242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003278519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36335522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1681989313","doi":"10.1111/pops.12017","title":"Victim and Perpetrator Groups' Responses to the <scp>C</scp>anadian Government's Apology for the Head Tax on <scp>C</scp>hinese Immigrants and the Moderating Influence of Collective Guilt","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Sincerity; Social psychology; Psychology; Perception; Government (linguistics); Ingroups and outgroups","score_opus":0.021654460430821778,"score_gpt":0.3302176618143667,"score_spread":0.3085632013835449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1681989313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.000036000525,0.000026051612,0.000059465314,0.000006832764,0.0000058748674,0.0000055600544,4.872009e-7,0.000873494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998431,0.00010902021,0.000059904905,0.00008583715,0.000008348262,0.000019146246,0.000019930889,0.0000011835916,0.0012655138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894506,0.00065565313,0.000054827415,0.000055650366,0.00014254199,0.00014633143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398524,0.00260045,0.0021999811,0.00026570048,0.00049050304,0.00045811673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018951936,0.00024546846,0.00027231398,0.0006504838,0.001921559,0.0014211445,0.0002212425,0.00079847046,0.0027185318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101898275,0.000150678,0.00019977521,0.0003659239,0.0010271197,0.0006023877,0.0013381132,0.0010777694,0.00022328903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007787963,0.0005639793,0.6461479,0.00012539001,0.0001291977,0.0015513981,0.3231848,0.00014076965,0.0029697963,0.0016575452,0.0012041705,0.021546287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026196245,0.000651499,0.5639481,0.00008393717,0.000044272256,0.00068986556,0.4305325,0.00035857843,0.00063534366,0.00041775955,0.0025704063,0.000041557385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004004089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006307761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99599594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042205985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039335838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010022819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682588597","doi":"10.1111/pops.12307","title":"Differences in Media Preference Mediate the Link Between Personality and Political Orientation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Openness to experience; Personality; Psychology; Preference; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Conservatism; Biology and political orientation; Politics; Trait; Political science; Extraversion and introversion; Economics","score_opus":0.3411263300923305,"score_gpt":0.4071697513316546,"score_spread":0.06604342123932411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682588597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99778324,0.00004762756,0.00010910898,0.000048931415,0.0000047819826,0.000006801509,0.000027213691,0.0000014069358,0.0019708609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994281,0.00003485747,0.00010650499,0.000021875725,0.0000036574324,0.0000043280675,0.00002504708,7.659175e-7,0.00037484517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997532,0.000117553915,0.000010526602,0.000033708773,0.000042348354,0.000042807274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713516,0.0011690293,0.000892713,0.00019141952,0.00018748007,0.0004242862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019068,0.0002090674,0.00012985017,0.0003857669,0.00040065957,0.0008585733,0.000104714796,0.00023857855,0.004794509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034398544,0.00015108673,0.00016721801,0.00021046745,0.0003892768,0.00022305707,0.0004436661,0.00043092764,0.0002469645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028712268,0.00033214476,0.9814456,0.000031557553,0.000093023256,0.00015143264,0.002441263,0.000085028434,0.003403352,0.00039239475,0.00015239157,0.011184659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062557474,0.000066547866,0.99834013,0.0000072422754,0.00001344761,0.000056458677,0.00079271436,0.00014331195,0.00015483589,0.00023169369,0.0001840025,0.0000033156414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019049086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004914806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004794509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015625045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022134738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016039252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741930452","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00862.x","title":"The Discursive Frames of Political Psychology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Huron University College","keywords":"Politics; Political psychology; Psychology; Discursive psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Discourse analysis; Law","score_opus":0.10193273589182056,"score_gpt":0.4573759623350087,"score_spread":0.35544322644318815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741930452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05081509,0.01185389,0.07896766,0.0925535,0.0011078547,0.000098728065,0.00013248698,0.000119471566,0.7643513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751022,0.003601961,0.008137297,0.0029974093,0.0011847112,0.00017482256,0.000055742417,0.00007848461,0.008667412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986034,0.009927292,0.00025575378,0.0012203949,0.002011976,0.00055060675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915107,0.005510013,0.0008580362,0.0010414508,0.0006697718,0.0004100145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111644305,0.0008029416,0.000559017,0.005271636,0.0069275117,0.015197589,0.0015111975,0.0029687537,0.0033096436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00903544,0.00032184867,0.00042635942,0.0034432835,0.0834805,0.008650718,0.004989667,0.0048019416,0.00051279995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026885841,0.000004106331,0.00007460085,0.000017784518,0.0000019671545,0.000010220517,0.005481266,0.000054624452,0.00002942797,0.99237156,0.0004549421,0.0014968449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074497043,0.000004938,0.00024033873,0.00006524595,0.000004054411,0.000022629396,0.0044002393,0.00022715745,0.00007700825,0.9633114,0.031634964,0.000004584328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024984528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016517767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015197589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008716875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033236141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778748324","doi":"10.1111/pops.12204","title":"Distributive Justice for Others, Collective Angst, and Support for Exclusion of Immigrants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"Wayne State University; Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Immigration; Psychology; Procedural justice; Distributive property; Compassion; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04636563552807551,"score_gpt":0.4256205319075234,"score_spread":0.3792548963794479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778748324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894506,0.00002031191,0.00002454729,0.000114835275,0.000003731978,0.00000349731,0.00000547628,0.0000011227219,0.00088139885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996762,0.000022687776,0.0000389812,0.000048009966,0.0000053513877,0.000006673248,0.00001018679,9.529382e-7,0.00019089936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994479,0.00022520109,0.00003293114,0.000084226005,0.00009561385,0.000114089795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942914,0.0014588829,0.002668728,0.00039495388,0.00025791477,0.0009281811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011000873,0.00022671996,0.00018255433,0.0004963585,0.0013322618,0.0015513416,0.0002936006,0.0005860947,0.0022475682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068619023,0.0002393457,0.0003041629,0.00021471754,0.0012169755,0.00053991925,0.001444641,0.0013135612,0.000111824316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018497446,0.0007703683,0.9605864,0.00003461862,0.000073976975,0.00020880309,0.026668388,0.00007729252,0.0016788876,0.00055899104,0.00030375397,0.008853422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072097573,0.00008267853,0.98649955,0.000019450665,0.000016549162,0.000057622776,0.012440178,0.00012670067,0.00016385767,0.00023306355,0.00034408312,0.000009087846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052593406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011809915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052593406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050335407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005694404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010457456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1835515630","doi":"10.1111/pops.12010","title":"Self‐Harm Focus Leads to Greater Collective Guilt: The Case of the <scp>U.S</scp>.‐<scp>I</scp>raq Conflict","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Collective action; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Focus group; Political science; Sociology; Psychiatry; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10205451487426777,"score_gpt":0.3383643569237673,"score_spread":0.23630984204949956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1835515630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936976,0.000061028837,0.000099037854,0.0008021657,0.000010080082,0.0000046678483,0.000004397157,0.0000016451468,0.005319483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948525,0.000025517254,0.00007029707,0.00019057604,0.000004579274,0.000007051391,0.0000041165677,0.0000019126646,0.00021062643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927646,0.00045673715,0.00001774081,0.00006258931,0.00009471592,0.00009179919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957047,0.002223485,0.0009688485,0.00035264148,0.00023743899,0.00051294744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018518982,0.00016190896,0.0002484875,0.0003792242,0.0021576867,0.0012226927,0.00035077333,0.0010539317,0.0024451215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007063829,0.00018643007,0.00025328144,0.00027070902,0.0029913168,0.0012351272,0.0016783967,0.0018132679,0.00015068418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004188766,0.0048407954,0.40272066,0.00042525568,0.00035849502,0.0093388315,0.3942078,0.0011429716,0.035086937,0.044384867,0.0119958725,0.09130873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003267815,0.0012020227,0.8024793,0.00016462553,0.00016280057,0.0045910943,0.14230667,0.001977479,0.00660437,0.030501738,0.009576947,0.00010616633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040492197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006952182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040492197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006054761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054510956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009793937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1886786995","doi":"10.1111/pops.12056","title":"Applying the Flanker Task to Political Psychology: A Research Note","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Nebraska-Lincoln; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Distraction; Psychology; Task (project management); Politics; Ideology; Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Psychological research; Cognition; Political psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.174775273920372,"score_gpt":0.5553606654739646,"score_spread":0.38058539155359256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1886786995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15669808,0.047733158,0.55383086,0.12593903,0.01574747,0.025931349,0.0019191478,0.0014828802,0.07071814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25978488,0.034821395,0.6332517,0.025541704,0.012427313,0.019029893,0.0008740993,0.0006987888,0.013570254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9595242,0.028802818,0.0030982518,0.0033214448,0.0046454323,0.00060780486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8799239,0.08422438,0.0032181437,0.021602644,0.009379719,0.0016511831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11125351,0.0014775441,0.0016080445,0.0020911342,0.0022643027,0.0055521624,0.0047564614,0.00533778,0.004201424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106214285,0.0017632163,0.0017710219,0.003206815,0.006448973,0.0172685,0.005234604,0.006537178,0.002480485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003811922,0.007468134,0.020304406,0.0042734966,0.00034146165,0.0023957675,0.017251031,0.0018134121,0.034605123,0.12717584,0.03690035,0.74365896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029275927,0.020457283,0.0724376,0.00510013,0.0007277815,0.008855837,0.010342214,0.015486014,0.056831103,0.33589393,0.46926284,0.0016775938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037019167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028981075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11125351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013134117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004704412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932415253","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00797.x","title":"How Exposure to the Confederate Flag Affects Willingness to Vote for Barack Obama","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Flag (linear algebra); White (mutation); Symbol (formal); Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Negativity effect; Political science; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04327965344525458,"score_gpt":0.40590989809124545,"score_spread":0.36263024464599086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932415253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.00000945833,0.000028571001,0.00004601332,0.00000515951,0.0000026532703,0.0000056961967,8.5254476e-7,0.00086779095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938786,0.000010547099,0.000035798268,0.00003627978,0.000002990192,0.000006804097,0.00000852857,0.0000011437118,0.00051006675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995522,0.00022156688,0.000015553513,0.00007613914,0.000042399482,0.00009200702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873084,0.0004985699,0.0003289661,0.000093394985,0.00006890305,0.0002792802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006173701,0.00015400583,0.00015395416,0.00020691965,0.0004502555,0.0011474366,0.000090425485,0.00059895986,0.005477752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026084175,0.00016365512,0.00017784143,0.00009439139,0.0005572357,0.00033344023,0.00043716392,0.000789073,0.00039411325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008308151,0.0060078045,0.7840529,0.00012374671,0.00019541415,0.0007082769,0.01791319,0.00032477573,0.1464326,0.0026644552,0.0012375645,0.03203109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010145431,0.0017960822,0.9858521,0.000015750209,0.00006899034,0.00020110937,0.004276283,0.00044049954,0.004970297,0.0010624349,0.0011845599,0.000030334695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010860551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016399442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005477752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002480801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016250568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018324912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969392131","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00689.x","title":"Government Apologies for Historical Injustices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Coding (social sciences); Criminology; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.060599164317421135,"score_gpt":0.41376319950663826,"score_spread":0.35316403518921713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969392131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340727,0.0006963427,0.004749057,0.005313234,0.00013468448,0.000046498368,0.00002238695,0.00007679237,0.054888256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968631,0.00012635946,0.0006783136,0.0004183776,0.000028896657,0.000008625397,0.000009849433,0.000006643943,0.0018599376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706525,0.0015224385,0.00018418898,0.00012812632,0.00074648135,0.00035351687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833387,0.005590314,0.007516233,0.0013169327,0.0011796725,0.0010581921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028113264,0.00019885787,0.00020324394,0.00087240955,0.003251661,0.0023109855,0.00047965348,0.0013701753,0.002973104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025758794,0.00009305644,0.00022780361,0.00038156228,0.003306174,0.0018826966,0.0017264747,0.0024591112,0.00031959396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028330876,0.0010222924,0.29046836,0.000537524,0.00017920005,0.008167735,0.17734043,0.0012105184,0.010405734,0.27819335,0.027006648,0.20518492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005689861,0.00071270845,0.38292828,0.0011735468,0.00016473047,0.01923955,0.2358242,0.004223651,0.008128337,0.13539214,0.21192974,0.00022614222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053628226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016339895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003251661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010342435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011023916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014867902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984811522","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00430.x","title":"Integrative Complexity in Face-to-Face Negotiations Between the Chiapas Guerrillas and the Mexican Government","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Face (sociological concept); Face-to-face; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Social science; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16161181272909667,"score_gpt":0.44258686124802316,"score_spread":0.2809750485189265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984811522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926265,0.00007745923,0.00045469086,0.0001852273,0.000009128586,0.00003273762,0.000026458561,0.0000070296205,0.006580871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802643,0.000063961095,0.0005688153,0.000039539675,0.000013272833,0.0000569846,0.000044513472,0.000008939498,0.0011774694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974185,0.0017851697,0.00007509876,0.00013877488,0.00038484336,0.00019750484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99011946,0.007137219,0.0015933395,0.00034011292,0.00047664734,0.000333301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020978055,0.0003020188,0.000302569,0.0013133046,0.002728813,0.002610176,0.0004414576,0.0005472401,0.002119139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018097619,0.00020451023,0.000110044966,0.0014017125,0.002540814,0.0010800363,0.0021941336,0.0011889945,0.00014693817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003978,0.000101237536,0.03744809,0.00017449108,0.000021223415,0.0011970629,0.9109804,0.0002921733,0.011555915,0.0052442793,0.00069310993,0.031894226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024027075,0.00012517134,0.3527169,0.00012148949,0.000014952265,0.00069680007,0.6229066,0.0011718844,0.0023082374,0.0035270897,0.016303653,0.00008318876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057226936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138985505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057226936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018197881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005857445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013203561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997077689","doi":"10.1111/pops.12263","title":"The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. By Howard G.Lavine, Christopher D.Johnston, &amp; Marco R.Steenbergen. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012. ISBN 978‐0‐19‐977275‐9. Pp. xviii+298. $69.99","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Democracy; Ambivalence; Sociology; Media studies; Citation; Politics; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.08162538500104596,"score_gpt":0.36381465486453707,"score_spread":0.28218926986349113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997077689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051785946,0.12480508,0.0073984712,0.23660551,0.0030578566,0.000052734915,0.0001384362,0.0001567004,0.5759994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83697176,0.059722856,0.0025874618,0.011301321,0.001955343,0.00008910102,0.00008683247,0.00018327487,0.08710205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994072,0.0004062739,0.000010801874,0.000046583682,0.00006957171,0.000059601272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979011,0.0015667266,0.00016897531,0.000076931115,0.000078758625,0.00020757319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015793459,0.00027340243,0.00023678127,0.00047891907,0.0018751937,0.0045367517,0.0004046217,0.0010073094,0.012971272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041766455,0.00033203466,0.0002452093,0.00064023526,0.0068197125,0.0032327918,0.0023468023,0.00231339,0.0015869945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016590348,0.00014905639,0.0028772817,0.0006065595,0.000059147762,0.00021783654,0.01941738,0.00080432557,0.0013297686,0.5259127,0.24336746,0.20509252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048483435,0.00009201505,0.015142881,0.0009371599,0.00004392089,0.0002404183,0.01035547,0.0011745655,0.00067740993,0.6309699,0.34027648,0.000041401563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024357894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012971272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015696969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011087841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043393254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004512016","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00381.x","title":"Harun al‐Rashid and the Terrorists: Identity Concealed, Identity Revealed","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Society for the Humanities, Cornell University; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Identity (music); Spell; Adventure; Theme (computing); Order (exchange); Point (geometry); History; Sociology; Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Art history; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03409912355142017,"score_gpt":0.4234229689063654,"score_spread":0.38932384535494524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004512016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44765568,0.030725298,0.00839705,0.177063,0.0021364675,0.000049509483,0.000051066712,0.000058293885,0.33386365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986509,0.0028911568,0.00040098472,0.004074264,0.00027722816,0.000012452095,0.0000068172267,0.0000137971265,0.0058143027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997182,0.0020639568,0.00003916022,0.00014446667,0.00029131156,0.00027912672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765366,0.0013282386,0.00046016305,0.00020353605,0.0001489934,0.00020537278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260245,0.00035227617,0.00027354687,0.0010046862,0.0105045885,0.008562491,0.0005826906,0.0036562232,0.0016828232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039694975,0.0003139066,0.00022132162,0.00070878805,0.04003775,0.007263565,0.0047461637,0.005854832,0.00021182031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054345266,0.000051832983,0.002838147,0.0000715259,0.000014475296,0.0007479986,0.37840128,0.00007394982,0.0003033805,0.59993523,0.007640949,0.009866913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043186647,0.00012466416,0.009924012,0.00047248387,0.00003740124,0.0027346965,0.5085842,0.00047480472,0.00085773825,0.23391674,0.24277085,0.000059170052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036740797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007021999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105045885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038357016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001816012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027830124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022784591","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00341","title":"Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism, and External Conflict","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Realism; Liberalism; Situational ethics; International relations; International relations theory; Positive economics; Social psychology; International conflict; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06378526826679953,"score_gpt":0.4421662575861964,"score_spread":0.37838098931939684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022784591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412612,0.00039250415,0.0020095138,0.003431178,0.000022396473,0.000018494888,0.000010763135,0.0000045804823,0.052849256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965394,0.000053476488,0.000062709885,0.000042222087,0.0000047553785,0.0000027734968,0.000003800586,0.0000012337802,0.00017511673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968267,0.0025460406,0.0000519254,0.0000950522,0.00027656238,0.00020371907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940492,0.003231008,0.0015780155,0.0002958594,0.00030872607,0.000537222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045559215,0.00017087685,0.00014569172,0.0010166711,0.0018475798,0.0046807895,0.00022506456,0.00060073246,0.0016781035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088459505,0.00010804658,0.00018584263,0.00079368707,0.0123584345,0.0021624228,0.002590027,0.0016856976,0.00009369361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024880093,0.00038411157,0.25760448,0.00013901286,0.00006928298,0.00056453183,0.27872106,0.0028544737,0.002011227,0.4157858,0.001279376,0.040337864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007817245,0.00035152974,0.33736682,0.00047588965,0.000054296164,0.0012225676,0.381281,0.0088378275,0.0019067348,0.22231323,0.04601845,0.0000935841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019308323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017081765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046807895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023583006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009071243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024094343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024534321","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00276","title":"The Problem of Transfer from Confidential Interactive Problem‐Solving: What Is the Role of the Facilitator?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Facilitator; Confidentiality; Perception; Complementarity (molecular biology); Psychology; Social psychology; Process (computing); Politics; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.027152985997859144,"score_gpt":0.3447195148421032,"score_spread":0.3175665288442441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024534321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1701289,0.010549083,0.30486125,0.4134538,0.002650243,0.0046085645,0.00017460846,0.00092171726,0.09265179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9080459,0.003017645,0.06351437,0.010009487,0.000680523,0.0071055777,0.000059092898,0.00017989373,0.0073874407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7683236,0.20294584,0.0045343107,0.0067977277,0.012003,0.005395391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6059925,0.3389124,0.010107673,0.021651993,0.013709267,0.009626188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19492535,0.001154847,0.0019647689,0.0017913654,0.009720265,0.013579826,0.011031114,0.010730257,0.009674002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34557775,0.0015053191,0.001401778,0.0013227616,0.018742632,0.037591826,0.019982863,0.0092464965,0.002731884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009286725,0.0021147819,0.010887124,0.0063519226,0.00024366294,0.0014178612,0.17557819,0.00402919,0.0017775656,0.2618405,0.017167406,0.5176631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011461882,0.0020988246,0.0078101032,0.00941468,0.0003389671,0.0028830438,0.21863696,0.027163971,0.0072271954,0.60328937,0.11951823,0.0004725705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030676518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017429746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19492535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066616167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018050635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99280035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032269736","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00299","title":"Early Communications in the War Against Terrorism: An Integrative Complexity Analysis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Surprise; Degree (music); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2346736438151335,"score_gpt":0.4799536020019079,"score_spread":0.2452799581867744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032269736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902096,0.00016360143,0.0024006036,0.00018391678,0.000009171762,0.000064134125,0.00016918118,0.00001560705,0.0067841182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980855,0.000066525,0.0012920403,0.000011345626,0.000023744753,0.00003988644,0.00015450512,0.000006526215,0.00031977493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986767,0.0005093792,0.00009773888,0.00010310355,0.00047484477,0.00013818336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803356,0.0113270525,0.0047520627,0.000609927,0.0017680797,0.0012073065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002185621,0.00034001743,0.00033878218,0.0066127796,0.0008856036,0.002311973,0.00030488553,0.0004128902,0.003300872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01817751,0.00021402423,0.0004246765,0.003695071,0.0011281112,0.0030220037,0.002644842,0.0009482132,0.00020159359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016494029,0.00050267234,0.7945079,0.00045437316,0.00035901187,0.0006931049,0.04069517,0.004197536,0.008539593,0.016580282,0.0015876128,0.13023332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002011204,0.00021652278,0.98018324,0.00004027796,0.000080694575,0.00016352696,0.0067361374,0.0051953425,0.00078137807,0.0047036353,0.0018401522,0.000039038914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018713226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002000699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066127796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001169371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007979585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011558831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048515950","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00513.x","title":"The New Russian Business Leaders - By Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries, Stanislav Shekshnia, Konstantin Korotov, and Elizabeth Florent-Treacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Russia and Soviet political economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.018424861647789437,"score_gpt":0.3373350254494229,"score_spread":0.31891016380163345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048515950","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015308578,0.8745376,0.00038403395,0.032911256,0.01814529,0.00002900816,0.0005211932,0.00010510294,0.07183565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013843586,0.38724366,0.00053186266,0.0052610813,0.0054908344,0.000038772137,0.000661832,0.00011751968,0.5868109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973613,0.000047749414,0.000018966037,0.000062209714,0.00010526719,0.00002966189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995378,0.00013394693,0.00007890436,0.000017663764,0.00015032465,0.000081319275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005001704,0.0012762838,0.0008185149,0.0011814985,0.0009863004,0.0018583224,0.0005184611,0.0009197333,0.05319733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011674656,0.00060185255,0.00030041122,0.0019562545,0.0007818428,0.0028957922,0.0010838804,0.002188519,0.038174283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016752352,0.000009329781,0.0002891365,0.00022455523,0.000007741672,0.00003184093,0.00032414732,0.00005262705,0.00015820302,0.0023026033,0.9429004,0.05368273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027172216,0.000008967221,0.0010111978,0.0002614276,0.000004336844,0.000093657916,0.00028201283,0.000017127166,0.00004917244,0.00051457627,0.9977502,0.000004558743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056526405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016085802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05319733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009597272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009295705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17796278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049574340","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00736.x","title":"Cognitive Management in an Enduring International Rivalry: The Case of India and Pakistan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Terrorism; Rivalry; Hostility; Cognition; Citizen journalism; Scale (ratio); Guerrilla warfare; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Geography; Politics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.11573944845796466,"score_gpt":0.49783952450227886,"score_spread":0.3821000760443142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049574340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98585296,0.000036076697,0.000094256524,0.0006893706,0.000004758322,0.0000071448317,0.0000082661345,0.00000220072,0.01330511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992292,0.00002664622,0.000047903402,0.000037148475,0.0000019276793,0.0000020001098,0.0000046793116,0.0000010233728,0.00064952584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991084,0.00036294185,0.000013330006,0.00004664843,0.00009165167,0.00037692752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985154,0.00062075007,0.00020522326,0.00006718992,0.00014855475,0.00044289223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009360219,0.0001880316,0.00016885581,0.00103764,0.0075535085,0.004006368,0.0007937265,0.0009440118,0.0040231217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025092938,0.00017396148,0.00019518202,0.001287885,0.0035029727,0.0011673038,0.0025189538,0.0013898093,0.00025873806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063946494,0.0010466357,0.2994166,0.00009588092,0.00008571202,0.055846144,0.48418942,0.002387932,0.0014415561,0.085877836,0.007717673,0.061255112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005580664,0.00019713036,0.14475952,0.000049167997,0.000038863716,0.0046920953,0.81567943,0.0041737496,0.00055697135,0.008099895,0.021631481,0.000065795495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099420644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099420644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042455103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026605383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19768387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053114998","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00588.x","title":"The Political Psychology of Liberation: From Politics to Ethics and Back","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Sociology; Reflexivity; Problematization; Liberation theology; Politics; Transformative learning; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26387013585078684,"score_gpt":0.6054918487737919,"score_spread":0.3416217129230051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053114998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020429047,0.06437787,0.029012162,0.2783939,0.0021204117,0.00006354614,0.00003129639,0.00006884198,0.6055029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007231,0.02634367,0.0062100496,0.021859214,0.0021379942,0.0002300353,0.000024852341,0.00011683376,0.042354234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927108,0.0056952727,0.00008038142,0.00031158613,0.00061587367,0.00058609684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948585,0.0038409545,0.0004118358,0.0002698259,0.00026954737,0.00034925123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005423869,0.0005108928,0.0003970717,0.0016533305,0.0056814924,0.011747701,0.0007625246,0.0033635232,0.004347673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069062416,0.00023371674,0.00036815595,0.0015360365,0.067104794,0.0066600894,0.0043966677,0.005474849,0.0006541468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037119169,0.000007853363,0.000094605646,0.000024802048,0.0000016114553,0.000033056265,0.0047529037,0.00008069662,0.000048860515,0.9886791,0.0018929333,0.0043798913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009084797,0.000013596755,0.00041680055,0.00025641106,0.0000023968066,0.00007327771,0.0066622742,0.00025324017,0.00011269381,0.8345912,0.15759912,0.000009752468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002556609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020727778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011747701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00697499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047782734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050607383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054419101","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00538.x","title":"Punishing Those Responsible for the Prison Abuses at Abu Ghraib: The Influence of the Negative Reciprocity Norm (NRN)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Norm of reciprocity; Wrongdoing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Norm (philosophy); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12591844272820585,"score_gpt":0.36490823206913237,"score_spread":0.23898978934092652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054419101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99789184,0.000032831802,0.000057305733,0.00019610011,0.000004150588,0.000003786094,0.0000023571158,7.179117e-7,0.001810929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964976,0.000039418068,0.00006822611,0.000058652982,0.0000026769387,0.0000036894187,0.0000032912499,6.951033e-7,0.00017368131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807066,0.0012474507,0.000042888747,0.00009433478,0.00025641356,0.00028829655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949132,0.0014315684,0.0022854179,0.00021955291,0.00044902292,0.0007012505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023641156,0.00016289756,0.00018971019,0.000422185,0.0015289823,0.0013137576,0.00027430087,0.0003529463,0.0012800065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009230736,0.00012374466,0.0000997479,0.00016110708,0.0018200281,0.00039059884,0.000807571,0.0011839167,0.0001521183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006116914,0.0005751855,0.90743816,0.00005225539,0.000074227755,0.00067325536,0.041302904,0.00015462001,0.007939384,0.0020097955,0.0006097909,0.03855876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011612672,0.00020520059,0.962479,0.00004725297,0.000024026864,0.000449327,0.033677567,0.00044260596,0.0007737567,0.0007334037,0.0011382016,0.000018164399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015353737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03647348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015353737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093138526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010883352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030528724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064871171","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00227","title":"The Making of Female Presidents and Prime Ministers: The Impact of Birth Order, Sex, of Siblings, and Father‐Daughter Dynamics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Politics; Birth order; Population; Power (physics); Psychology; Demography; Affect (linguistics); Order (exchange); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05958372908591468,"score_gpt":0.4469525858280638,"score_spread":0.3873688567421491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064871171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984642,0.00024348522,0.000027167154,0.00015720392,0.000010438273,0.0000014220825,0.000023392566,7.7757704e-7,0.0010718015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998944,0.00015672577,0.000023716859,0.000019383664,0.000008083727,0.0000013924582,0.00002412603,0.0000015531832,0.0008209932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993837,0.0002539071,0.000020280368,0.000072077135,0.00014062176,0.00012947866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966648,0.0012049543,0.0010125302,0.000117564545,0.00019213009,0.0008080428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012094986,0.00012058868,0.00021601409,0.00048500762,0.0007691482,0.0008094901,0.00020706846,0.00017447463,0.004406821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007904236,0.00011826321,0.00013626821,0.00032393422,0.0005584672,0.0004990139,0.000593047,0.00041390027,0.00042030987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026232988,0.00009099496,0.9690541,0.000011483204,0.00003325644,0.00033934158,0.0057915314,0.000034827466,0.00059721444,0.0007310706,0.00048105305,0.022572763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009171924,0.000121500765,0.9899541,0.00001567642,0.000015306196,0.00049225107,0.0071273283,0.0000957645,0.00033598187,0.00037074074,0.0014569543,0.0000052090068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041171005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104165245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004406821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031187636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040160966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014742255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081395514","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00176","title":"Two‐Timing: Politics and Response Latencies in a Bilingual Survey","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales","keywords":"Allegiance; Politics; Context (archaeology); Panel survey; Interview; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Applied psychology; Sociology; Law; Demography; History","score_opus":0.1605493679202427,"score_gpt":0.48182744777285563,"score_spread":0.3212780798526129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081395514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98579806,0.00012260639,0.008370089,0.00016113938,0.000034141573,0.00017890798,0.0006902364,0.00008843556,0.0045565036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959151,0.00006304254,0.0019887057,0.00007558724,0.000027960747,0.00032721597,0.00043060485,0.000038739956,0.0011329466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831251,0.012010581,0.0010773657,0.000925569,0.002147371,0.00071397604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8739588,0.09002089,0.021438736,0.006730951,0.0060819625,0.0017686681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018736802,0.00027792892,0.0003401019,0.0010972077,0.00056824513,0.001067346,0.00033033564,0.0005684442,0.0035632236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1044302,0.00025750115,0.00025774137,0.0013672033,0.00046347288,0.0011205081,0.0010346555,0.0008104228,0.0013330138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005024651,0.00039575444,0.9262158,0.00014393622,0.000091650465,0.00018669324,0.005194212,0.00077798206,0.008235129,0.000936769,0.0008496349,0.051947806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066020635,0.0009840305,0.9851505,0.000031107636,0.00004788509,0.0003193961,0.0016469035,0.0024576918,0.0058248118,0.0008358447,0.0025732783,0.00006255777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002552275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035073764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018736802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000560955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087486487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099090815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086958039","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00688.x","title":"Group Threat, Collective Angst, and Ingroup Forgiveness for the War in Iraq","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Forgiveness; Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03938410147580841,"score_gpt":0.39091896238481905,"score_spread":0.35153486090901065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086958039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99906033,0.000024477395,0.00002256652,0.000060584327,0.0000030551882,0.0000032943574,0.0000034708285,8.2509246e-7,0.0008212478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.000035351266,0.00003825672,0.000040334002,0.0000052880264,0.000007424486,0.000006068583,6.7617765e-7,0.00022417687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995696,0.00021507447,0.000013794721,0.000032430355,0.00008718906,0.0000818732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.0005908316,0.0011609666,0.00017257643,0.00009920196,0.00037438326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010488165,0.0003236191,0.00023325683,0.00040893018,0.0010236772,0.0008082145,0.00020180648,0.0005793974,0.0019847967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003971611,0.00016738438,0.00020938738,0.00013702916,0.0009135229,0.00044899367,0.0005847672,0.0011103568,0.00018276281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015734555,0.006830205,0.8971435,0.00015994452,0.0002888459,0.0007094896,0.03821076,0.00077984465,0.018198282,0.0017176571,0.0010870016,0.03330105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023652477,0.000739122,0.98934805,0.000019966372,0.00003558009,0.00014242737,0.007973368,0.00029219742,0.00049244234,0.00044678518,0.00047056537,0.000015764392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017587276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035690537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019847967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005116635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022404203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006639838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089282320","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00636.x","title":"It's Not Easy Being Green: Minor Party Labels as Heuristic Aids","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of California, Davis","keywords":"Minor (academic); Heuristic; Politics; Public opinion; Social psychology; Work (physics); Order (exchange); Psychology; Third party; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Law; Internet privacy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11255425083285613,"score_gpt":0.43398889281088165,"score_spread":0.3214346419780255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089282320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755879,0.00020421649,0.0028280711,0.0006572691,0.00003316109,0.000030497817,0.00003053326,0.000023422881,0.020604938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835616,0.000057678724,0.00095862185,0.00009968119,0.000012200348,0.000010858502,0.000016836366,0.000010283711,0.00047756959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570894,0.0032039427,0.00010667766,0.00022886704,0.00055432995,0.00019720318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96261704,0.025970977,0.0072362735,0.0021900537,0.0011160105,0.00086965354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037062825,0.0002733615,0.00030238557,0.00074769015,0.0010112942,0.002575209,0.00024181101,0.00059328193,0.0034939575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033938993,0.00019507894,0.00016746022,0.00061024236,0.0018836978,0.002092022,0.0016154721,0.0011260139,0.00030018933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056712786,0.0019162729,0.33964592,0.0009778142,0.00021301802,0.0005556719,0.092639625,0.003299695,0.04065864,0.06392359,0.005159463,0.44533893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038774687,0.003044347,0.7460726,0.0006361283,0.0005149382,0.0007546535,0.072838254,0.020954484,0.02011143,0.08603895,0.048324328,0.00032217836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011031448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023250345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037062825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062687526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004350728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019600868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097270909","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00750.x","title":"Why Do Students Strike? Direct and Indirect Determinants of Collective Action Participation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Collective action; Collective identity; Action (physics); Social psychology; Identification (biology); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Collective efficacy; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Path analysis (statistics); Sociology; Political science; Social group; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08291133867885503,"score_gpt":0.4947724494888188,"score_spread":0.4118611108099638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097270909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99511105,0.00005628127,0.00016177495,0.00057077827,0.000007707479,0.000015283036,0.000031740623,0.0000034704403,0.004041918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.000032209955,0.000050866853,0.000031935837,0.000003254409,0.0000052973496,0.000014599526,0.0000013883239,0.00042475603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998078,0.00076749764,0.00004553029,0.00021679855,0.00026670442,0.0006253658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919912,0.0036470732,0.0019207364,0.000219118,0.0006005382,0.0016214085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018613277,0.00021325263,0.0002562169,0.000770454,0.0013833158,0.0028460815,0.00044247863,0.0010664408,0.0057923244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009293574,0.00018171674,0.00026161873,0.00057088706,0.0020991666,0.0007871129,0.0009614382,0.0010970054,0.00050695136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013440504,0.0003195642,0.9563497,0.00003907152,0.00006108181,0.00023434754,0.020039886,0.00024052759,0.00064189336,0.0014071403,0.00051212794,0.020020232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001216365,0.000059387705,0.96442586,0.000024726536,0.000021498588,0.000042544765,0.03249935,0.0004393559,0.00011570106,0.00096683664,0.0013814305,0.000011203254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04796774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102075204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04796774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001744516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024604695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09537703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102360396","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00521.x","title":"Geographical Frame of Reference and Dangerous Intergroup Attitudes: A Double‐Minority Study in Sri Lanka","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Tamil; Ethnic conflict; Ethnic group; Social psychology; South asia; Political science; Salient; Internally displaced person; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Ethnology; Law","score_opus":0.06391578230712967,"score_gpt":0.4343879516359181,"score_spread":0.3704721693287884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102360396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976283,0.000006929093,0.00000652067,0.000010364214,8.1376993e-7,0.000005372685,0.0000023892585,1.6531051e-7,0.00020451914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996333,0.000028971517,0.000028079807,0.00003007004,0.0000018102535,0.000014058226,0.000007897608,8.060354e-7,0.0002550443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993838,0.00023690188,0.000034273864,0.00007963481,0.00008618118,0.00017924396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900776,0.00023905962,0.00025675056,0.00009176523,0.00012394528,0.00028069373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011755308,0.0005172996,0.00049378804,0.0008878599,0.004406244,0.0017705356,0.000557364,0.0006611742,0.0022259895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018476801,0.0005499201,0.00039067352,0.0005736218,0.0020048087,0.0009881958,0.0014187396,0.0011002986,0.00045080672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079052814,0.0031192624,0.350641,0.000091190544,0.000088831766,0.0019120275,0.6224946,0.000042799864,0.01021634,0.00054577296,0.00029277254,0.009765009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006663226,0.0013717415,0.4794904,0.000037215967,0.000060555536,0.00050288945,0.51596534,0.00014679795,0.0006859211,0.00012485436,0.0015044593,0.000043172466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046774063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09085458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046774063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010323068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007825494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09300363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119734301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00852.x","title":"Philosopher‐King or Polarizing Politician? A Personality Profile of Barack Obama","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Psychological Testing and Assessment","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Michigan","keywords":"Presidency; Personality; Presidential system; Psychology; Social psychology; Personality profile; Style (visual arts); Big Five personality traits; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.3299459593900069,"score_gpt":0.46161239096143886,"score_spread":0.13166643157143193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119734301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99739045,0.0001001082,0.000041302905,0.00038784673,0.00001242091,0.000004149021,0.000042943146,0.0000010630749,0.0020197465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775666,0.00019161701,0.00008845712,0.0001307667,0.000021452239,0.0000064189626,0.00007667696,0.0000031512232,0.00172485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997459,0.000100963465,0.000013512691,0.000023126058,0.000057319314,0.00005917154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986621,0.00019154359,0.0004452405,0.000042904387,0.00021493045,0.00044331184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059896754,0.00013771962,0.0002037766,0.0009310893,0.0016911366,0.0022386676,0.00012545937,0.0002870404,0.0017356129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021973806,0.00010944335,0.00007311854,0.0008790177,0.00051158015,0.0007272478,0.00046489434,0.00070192147,0.0005195551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001383888,0.00015865658,0.9293734,0.0000276242,0.000025850622,0.00034657537,0.04338439,0.000058406695,0.0015341205,0.0009826018,0.0034305286,0.020539518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000268131,0.00007594777,0.9493392,0.000023579298,0.0000062766717,0.00028147065,0.044705663,0.00023724187,0.00018370574,0.00020289296,0.0049302946,0.00001109722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007838997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018657379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007838997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039706958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002898368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015586734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132663781","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00881.x","title":"The Heritability of Duty and Voter Turnout","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Turnout; Duty; Personality; History; Psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Voting; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04656048677730671,"score_gpt":0.44568614685206603,"score_spread":0.3991256600747593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132663781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721766,0.00012394521,0.00033896888,0.000264619,0.000012012752,0.0000025360648,0.000058301295,0.0000045361276,0.0019774125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.000027145079,0.00006515866,0.000017217462,0.000008188794,0.0000011747343,0.000015369314,0.0000029131043,0.0003527695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.00048455075,0.00002978782,0.00022792647,0.00010747178,0.0001676891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112076,0.004683071,0.0015625033,0.0015049236,0.0003711798,0.00075748266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014548115,0.00020227251,0.00028170997,0.00074111595,0.00078799174,0.0009260777,0.00025075822,0.00075691415,0.00589657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008648751,0.00039268046,0.00019131579,0.00045218502,0.0009724106,0.00049005,0.0006964563,0.0007620669,0.00041778426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022939261,0.00023528577,0.9756731,0.000009144151,0.00011066455,0.00023943058,0.0013246399,0.00039572717,0.0053036627,0.007432785,0.00035314416,0.008693106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010546271,0.00003225897,0.99496645,0.0000072924922,0.000027663647,0.00021777891,0.0004650773,0.00057913404,0.00028298603,0.0030512558,0.00035279055,0.0000068564727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004254775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058978274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00589657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027078905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002587822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019725978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133307240","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00358.x","title":"Political Psychology in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Mainstream; Field (mathematics); Political psychology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08263082873634527,"score_gpt":0.5024059794346022,"score_spread":0.41977515069825694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133307240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13372585,0.036755156,0.0013912183,0.30359522,0.0022636696,0.00014452047,0.001542225,0.00016197214,0.5204202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82760376,0.017480098,0.0016351467,0.026007626,0.00030134048,0.000070747315,0.0004798416,0.000070903676,0.12635054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646014,0.00040876132,0.00006694612,0.00029818926,0.0011262823,0.0016395197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912574,0.00080737035,0.00029113004,0.00012863384,0.0034756688,0.0040397556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025298921,0.00026789884,0.00049659587,0.002393058,0.032498796,0.0075323833,0.0008380429,0.0021732333,0.014982154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050858967,0.00034547495,0.00033013354,0.004724318,0.006004071,0.0015190273,0.0025668815,0.003833771,0.0007658986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118885524,0.00013267295,0.036864568,0.00053643616,0.00005609401,0.0007560836,0.026768655,0.0007776746,0.0010796145,0.44559896,0.33575457,0.15155576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037159716,0.000028765015,0.11243177,0.00043219162,0.000030555933,0.00015236849,0.017983692,0.0004962597,0.0002655089,0.012344615,0.85572535,0.00007162409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22794977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22794977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46437812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89546883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147442708","doi":"10.1111/pops.12035","title":"The Uncertainty Paradox: Perceived Threat Moderates the Effect of Uncertainty on Political Tolerance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Politics; Social psychology; Feeling; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.025724117526620835,"score_gpt":0.38098868036305333,"score_spread":0.3552645628364325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147442708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99379504,0.00009639964,0.00042300936,0.0002626393,0.000017659553,0.000004484327,0.000016904625,0.0000044378016,0.0053794226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956423,0.000027054959,0.00013342203,0.00006290052,0.000007774563,0.0000053800254,0.000008627498,0.000003333488,0.00018729123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.0009325267,0.000055500062,0.00015481304,0.00030319826,0.000110898276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765993,0.017518029,0.003062977,0.0009829781,0.00035797025,0.0014787081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023858391,0.00027725537,0.0004029323,0.00038818302,0.00053747307,0.001561634,0.00030455203,0.0008050573,0.005363123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017788129,0.00022469278,0.00022520604,0.00025817595,0.0012141279,0.0010526207,0.001682707,0.0011176867,0.00018127839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02166896,0.006178588,0.62379134,0.0011534615,0.0011951711,0.0017767642,0.032343213,0.0074676834,0.1475545,0.05655192,0.0028925778,0.097425826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043147587,0.0018140884,0.95137787,0.000090305395,0.00024868693,0.00035544674,0.0039925687,0.0060771853,0.0054283966,0.027783053,0.0022891245,0.00011174062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058083417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006910695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005363123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028571265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031190494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017941475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149992006","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00897.x","title":"Thin‐Slice Decisions Do Not Need Faces to be Predictive of Election Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Psychology; Schema (genetic algorithms); Heuristics; Social psychology; Competence (human resources); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Association (psychology); Cognitive bias; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10423323627254083,"score_gpt":0.4478227500615858,"score_spread":0.34358951378904495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149992006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98971355,0.000055679022,0.002663267,0.000099679775,0.000016477974,0.000024397754,0.00015971815,0.000022453256,0.007244721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785393,0.000026582788,0.0014384113,0.00004157381,0.000012104392,0.00001892053,0.00021796169,0.000009386881,0.00038104295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994634,0.00013439925,0.00003337664,0.00015885459,0.00014494751,0.00006507005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899587,0.004661335,0.0030897874,0.0013242732,0.0005302457,0.0004356507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011305925,0.00027194765,0.00027323957,0.00028469946,0.00035519796,0.0012355467,0.00020599917,0.0004526527,0.0069106417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016443094,0.00028374835,0.00037471898,0.00019305076,0.0005407636,0.0012486302,0.00053164747,0.00067562005,0.0004518726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038160814,0.0005914604,0.79058576,0.00026202668,0.0003846618,0.00043464254,0.0021812818,0.0027024825,0.1050277,0.007945963,0.001467752,0.084600165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040500803,0.0003494324,0.98089635,0.00002873811,0.00006778341,0.00033547974,0.00053946715,0.0035917985,0.0072611524,0.006001387,0.0008472187,0.000040728708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013072909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021170478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069106417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020456249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002539096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023118436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151415801","doi":"10.1111/pops.12185","title":"When Suspicious Minds Go Political: Distrusting and Justifying the System at the Same Time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Injustice; Situational ethics; Politics; Social psychology; System justification; Trait; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Compromise; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282734010238979,"score_gpt":0.38590389597835667,"score_spread":0.33307655587596685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151415801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99357563,0.00003730242,0.0006210249,0.00043794184,0.0000071311483,0.000012831613,0.000008641323,0.0000056790964,0.0052938005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955875,0.000019577172,0.00014869493,0.00007371055,0.0000036538104,0.000004331103,0.0000068209324,0.0000025075608,0.00018196205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968546,0.0015595895,0.0001211802,0.00027524767,0.00067480427,0.0005145089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859439,0.0048346575,0.006094369,0.0011854229,0.0008468596,0.0010947766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026475212,0.00027137782,0.00028164525,0.0018986606,0.0015961409,0.0049309614,0.00040940664,0.0013445792,0.0024267803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019700153,0.00056871166,0.0003498696,0.00060606387,0.0060992357,0.002195931,0.0021556509,0.0020506703,0.00013600236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074072997,0.000939562,0.77012175,0.00012331473,0.00022688493,0.0019499506,0.16050576,0.0006605748,0.0098731695,0.028275434,0.0009612809,0.025621567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748695,0.00024962047,0.86852396,0.000083549014,0.00015534757,0.001188396,0.09842983,0.002956011,0.0031438724,0.02278727,0.0023162412,0.000118445794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054483213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065404763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054483213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012887967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010939316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014001608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155635359","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00850.x","title":"Two Years of Ups and Downs: Barack Obama's Patterns of Integrative Complexity, Motive Imagery, and Values","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Situational ethics; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Power (physics); Thematic map; Hierarchy; Adversarial system; Value (mathematics); Ranking (information retrieval); Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Statistics; Qualitative research; Social science; Mathematics; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.1991917463651073,"score_gpt":0.4387497740334825,"score_spread":0.23955802766837517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155635359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969193,0.00008814518,0.00006534751,0.00016600454,0.00000843948,0.0000044609455,0.000037347938,0.0000033965123,0.0027075668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.000049313527,0.00006510466,0.000022718958,0.0000066723646,0.000008242713,0.00007665024,0.0000032447354,0.00094271067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958545,0.00014539386,0.000020694997,0.000047549554,0.000078459845,0.00012248308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783903,0.0005917263,0.0006912681,0.00009789178,0.00028246726,0.0004975794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00099482,0.00018374146,0.0002036987,0.0015981179,0.0019540733,0.002223518,0.00031467548,0.00040973537,0.0018390135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034909905,0.00020991892,0.0001190464,0.0011681385,0.0012108629,0.00090663525,0.0016632511,0.0010911339,0.0001803044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033956114,0.00012574803,0.66877663,0.00007020765,0.000055160723,0.00048616913,0.28335944,0.00013693838,0.0035057643,0.0024794743,0.003564326,0.037100505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026568266,0.000056411143,0.8525974,0.00002751833,0.000007657957,0.00013402969,0.14102553,0.00009624077,0.00033426977,0.00021639146,0.0054849396,0.000016924636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013911077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04809575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013911077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010789976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063297036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027660191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156255487","doi":"10.1111/0162-895x.00179","title":"Do Strength‐Related Attitude Properties Determine Susceptibility to Response Effects? New Evidence From Response Latency, Attitude Extremity, and Aggregate Indices","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Response time; Computer science","score_opus":0.06449857731704196,"score_gpt":0.395025093659009,"score_spread":0.33052651634196706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156255487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98005086,0.00049494184,0.010142882,0.0003044256,0.000029856725,0.00009511903,0.00016565119,0.00007844002,0.008637789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970283,0.00011313625,0.0019725875,0.00010847861,0.000033704346,0.00006435407,0.00012321779,0.000060416893,0.0004958394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985824,0.008045177,0.0008872199,0.002074638,0.0027477713,0.00042121243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68653363,0.24398735,0.029548807,0.03157573,0.0060141603,0.0023402767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029780215,0.0005185123,0.0005510752,0.0015642099,0.00042069232,0.0017189861,0.0006188455,0.0009190798,0.0058872416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13745658,0.000529815,0.0007205368,0.00089244463,0.001964597,0.0028973718,0.0017551373,0.0016987709,0.00061140297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007985842,0.00046850045,0.9431217,0.00016737543,0.00044158197,0.000067603345,0.0033978238,0.0005139518,0.0050350544,0.0017842894,0.00021991479,0.04398365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023310964,0.00028105968,0.99173003,0.000026776028,0.00013838206,0.00009647302,0.00046139123,0.0012475884,0.0021893373,0.0031459255,0.00063192245,0.000027810447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008793691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010413061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033599528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039177164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15749466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159863353","doi":"10.1111/pops.12225","title":"Feeling Hopeful Inspires Support for Social Change","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Association of Social Psychology; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Social change; Mood; Social support; Power (physics); Scale (ratio); Action (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.0965596135387914,"score_gpt":0.42210187713410785,"score_spread":0.32554226359531646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159863353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775457,0.00053435453,0.0013236001,0.0018168399,0.00006226339,0.000021761705,0.00003968534,0.000040171217,0.018615587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991731,0.00014200663,0.00027967017,0.00009398247,0.000015525758,0.000005071591,0.000011924817,0.0000021122876,0.0002765501],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994326,0.00025320932,0.000024911053,0.000038855615,0.0001637698,0.00008658346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433374,0.0018020343,0.0020056756,0.00033907354,0.00029926214,0.0012200973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013839126,0.0001600854,0.00019263224,0.00046529027,0.0006798488,0.0016117226,0.00017519345,0.00049113255,0.0021246225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00721874,0.00015075589,0.00040099333,0.00020171415,0.0015315994,0.00059597567,0.0011999358,0.0011897616,0.00018244889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007062013,0.0015301708,0.7263572,0.0007358007,0.00084221544,0.0010329509,0.031231422,0.0008271035,0.014339217,0.026011644,0.00763012,0.188756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006311988,0.00083807425,0.9565303,0.00014662844,0.00019624364,0.0010074477,0.015831681,0.00087982597,0.0012564613,0.014018717,0.009161057,0.00007045682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040407377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010349498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021246225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003250318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003556335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007318914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169283536","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00649.x","title":"Crisis Management: Looking Back to Look Forward","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Politics; George (robot); Cold war; Political science; Deterrence theory; Political economy; Crisis management; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.05662163453583772,"score_gpt":0.4124544244032854,"score_spread":0.35583278986744765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169283536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047877687,0.10502877,0.0007805724,0.87755436,0.008212647,0.0000056245012,0.000030180026,0.00002316555,0.00788595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11213823,0.3635408,0.003493661,0.4645771,0.03370577,0.00007231143,0.00016050912,0.00018700692,0.022124577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551094,0.0022634126,0.00022013109,0.000446509,0.00084462966,0.0007143922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844988,0.0068523544,0.00083424523,0.00056221645,0.004488408,0.002764065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009493291,0.00085842813,0.001136544,0.0019455539,0.0040384037,0.013953113,0.0018236985,0.01351425,0.016308123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02170839,0.00043003532,0.0005620841,0.0021132233,0.010685986,0.02931841,0.005730771,0.025413817,0.004202595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487297,0.00016227919,0.0008828308,0.0013898584,0.000072246075,0.00024227843,0.0039720926,0.00047529634,0.00018727146,0.3754272,0.4513213,0.16571863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044673845,0.000102789294,0.0009866346,0.005977223,0.000026365791,0.00029802468,0.019783938,0.0004928873,0.00018778104,0.33314934,0.6388673,0.00008304126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070861885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009579868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016308123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007252852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01027137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05455613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170134874","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00387.x","title":"Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric During the Course of an Election Campaign","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Anger; Newspaper; Appeal to emotion; Social psychology; Preference; Psychology; Incentive; Drama; Credibility; Persuasion; Advertising; Political science; Law; Appeal; Economics","score_opus":0.05038961082908301,"score_gpt":0.4185263533639609,"score_spread":0.3681367425348779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170134874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91264176,0.00096877903,0.00076429994,0.0026311039,0.00011663795,0.000045459183,0.00006980623,0.000037905924,0.082724154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638927,0.00015848942,0.00024071225,0.0002307895,0.00006313949,0.000012362377,0.00003718298,0.0000143884445,0.002853501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728763,0.0015967293,0.000056517503,0.00017534064,0.0005269606,0.0003569323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98372746,0.01136802,0.0020230957,0.00032186313,0.0013007044,0.0012587218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004976264,0.0002613567,0.0002928461,0.0020803083,0.004660252,0.004168116,0.00042369126,0.0011917691,0.003986151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025929132,0.00019762828,0.00014994344,0.00094079645,0.002491066,0.0018363091,0.001518367,0.0013687309,0.00052473386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027752488,0.0011027021,0.18427983,0.0008410812,0.00017620162,0.0025455425,0.48131084,0.0006540319,0.021251049,0.05440043,0.016973509,0.23368953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010923993,0.0012548529,0.68035036,0.0005401097,0.00022605335,0.000755222,0.19082232,0.0019759163,0.0057017994,0.014736855,0.103419565,0.00010773089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01080308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029933784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01080308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026788916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012652912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026317298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175884964","doi":"10.1111/pops.12317","title":"“We Got To Live Together”: The Psychology of Encounter and the Politics of Engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Huron University College","keywords":"Politics; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Contact hypothesis; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Social science; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1314725830412552,"score_gpt":0.4469600760794367,"score_spread":0.3154874930381815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175884964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08597022,0.00848818,0.029748205,0.2526476,0.0017950089,0.00010574788,0.000034692694,0.00008852705,0.62112176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757037,0.0014318592,0.0018365107,0.009264892,0.0005062943,0.00012327945,0.000014737453,0.00006202978,0.011056692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742681,0.020857034,0.00019960427,0.0012392949,0.0016708797,0.0017650127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067056,0.006145343,0.00082253426,0.00044247395,0.00041843302,0.0015006708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012268628,0.0004894228,0.0005671475,0.0025477053,0.02555295,0.0224775,0.0017200737,0.008345603,0.0053312923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011179666,0.00045353055,0.0006841143,0.002080719,0.1370749,0.020519966,0.015333877,0.012683548,0.0007049758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105995,0.00002157309,0.00034628386,0.000025465317,0.0000046176397,0.000112659116,0.1297085,0.000056260593,0.000047146666,0.86375624,0.0029932314,0.0029174227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022729877,0.000032078304,0.000745546,0.0002063325,0.000007663843,0.00025439766,0.2009494,0.0003015932,0.00009603234,0.6877007,0.109662816,0.000020799787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004158188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030366092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02555295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071486486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053408514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06488353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235942705","doi":"10.1111/pops.12325","title":"Explaining Normative Versus Nonnormative Action: The Role of Implicit Theories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Psychology; Action (physics); Social psychology; Collective action; Context (archaeology); Normative social influence; Identification (biology); Hatred; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.06034826206554169,"score_gpt":0.43868798106683504,"score_spread":0.3783397190012934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235942705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88996416,0.0006127922,0.03573644,0.004960402,0.00008036767,0.00009488989,0.000055194232,0.000035535148,0.06846018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959662,0.0001337929,0.0031063596,0.00014925661,0.000014650722,0.000034725632,0.000032479664,0.000012139402,0.00055047515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567175,0.0027499357,0.00013328767,0.00048090168,0.0006348608,0.00032929736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97330576,0.018382119,0.004221229,0.002030336,0.0012788024,0.0007817162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073557496,0.0004975914,0.00035084257,0.0011841637,0.0010128455,0.004150343,0.0007917703,0.0012809255,0.0040255436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02346639,0.00034537207,0.000535074,0.0006310795,0.0060899723,0.0043384708,0.0020963158,0.002482246,0.00024883982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032519439,0.0011753798,0.40449458,0.0006538323,0.00031296792,0.0006331922,0.08546915,0.0044652894,0.0025795884,0.4165205,0.00092608616,0.082444325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001300906,0.00025831614,0.21604522,0.0005383578,0.0002462727,0.00040593167,0.03930858,0.037315585,0.0020589733,0.6947482,0.008838006,0.000106456384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002459792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033435011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073557496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014299687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014423919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03890139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339662209","doi":"10.1111/pops.12338","title":"Locus of Control and Anti‐Immigrant Sentiment in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Locus of control; Immigration; Outgroup; Feeling; Social psychology; Ethnocentrism; Prejudice (legal term); Perception; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026578451496430525,"score_gpt":0.33765972430640623,"score_spread":0.3110812728099757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339662209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973271,0.00028649162,0.000029062838,0.00016986569,0.0000074327777,0.000006699386,0.00021496965,0.0000022280774,0.0019560466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992144,0.00017199156,0.00002486904,0.00003037809,0.0000014363401,0.0000028175516,0.00017048913,0.0000020511873,0.00038153844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991596,0.00009548368,0.000046335572,0.00006494552,0.00032829482,0.00030535957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526656,0.00047442983,0.0009417553,0.00011592335,0.0018372376,0.0013641322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009822339,0.0001934696,0.00032550006,0.001451455,0.003092563,0.002280353,0.00053314836,0.00035616825,0.0015532152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004654323,0.00016221292,0.0003002354,0.0026680517,0.0015538727,0.000371849,0.001194495,0.0006438614,0.00012235671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006687557,0.000034258024,0.98762774,0.000014612505,0.00003184896,0.000098329125,0.005812409,0.00011732428,0.000116822855,0.00050621753,0.00066357636,0.004909916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041376147,0.000009187669,0.99197805,0.000034554007,0.000008430258,0.00002465228,0.006875284,0.00012671447,0.00004683524,0.000036180427,0.000845322,0.000010738012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98625726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99105835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018023103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018023103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013505943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1307674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406656080","doi":"10.1111/pops.12347","title":"Personality Traits and Political Ideology: A First Global Assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Ideology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Politics; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Big Five personality traits and culture; Psychology; Parallels; Value (mathematics); World Values Survey; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.046552055144340375,"score_gpt":0.4376940555763778,"score_spread":0.39114200043203745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406656080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816018,0.00095014647,0.0023350196,0.00041274092,0.000041521314,0.00006178686,0.001122984,0.000031765678,0.013442269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963381,0.00040801865,0.0015696144,0.00004215189,0.000040267205,0.000039714858,0.0008071273,0.000010112613,0.00074477587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924755,0.00033308752,0.000056497818,0.00009704795,0.00018223045,0.000083575156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759716,0.0008802213,0.00044808394,0.00029104427,0.00042570973,0.00035770118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020054537,0.00062203367,0.00048856495,0.0030698325,0.00056126446,0.0012543931,0.00025358322,0.0003761427,0.0051693735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027216144,0.00015175552,0.00090990646,0.0020868112,0.0006487793,0.0014741311,0.0022884489,0.00078104896,0.00060109555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252608,0.00010177795,0.9500938,0.000090385765,0.00023772905,0.00008918862,0.0018988332,0.00022892332,0.0006755621,0.0010743412,0.00077823945,0.04460598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060603884,0.0003798217,0.99448884,0.0000416195,0.000080414036,0.00019641829,0.001591836,0.000482228,0.0001574471,0.0005226916,0.0020415655,0.000011014007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075791345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010954478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051693735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020729484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025030653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017293215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467838142","doi":"10.1057/9780230598744_15","title":"Multicultural Policy and Social Psychology: The Canadian Experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Ethnic group; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Social policy; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Anthropology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.07896744745387095,"score_gpt":0.4358563886708855,"score_spread":0.35688894121701453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467838142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4156894,0.047611296,0.0008196939,0.16960405,0.0021777437,0.000110887275,0.0004199643,0.00009924186,0.3634678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91734195,0.021613404,0.00058403815,0.013152707,0.00021410965,0.00004995817,0.000109824105,0.00009465353,0.04683932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936127,0.0015603278,0.00009346632,0.00038658688,0.0017759464,0.0025710398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931064,0.0014427145,0.0002052525,0.00012211071,0.0015618033,0.00356174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053804168,0.00058855966,0.00079815777,0.0021569992,0.062230185,0.011822954,0.002039276,0.0034135026,0.009949261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006297602,0.0005424553,0.00045105175,0.006689007,0.02422514,0.003970246,0.0061306846,0.0073706107,0.00045200228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007871153,0.00017785074,0.011246287,0.00022519864,0.000025407291,0.00093872024,0.73295337,0.00033104175,0.00053936534,0.1296586,0.07158297,0.05224243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016939433,0.00003733525,0.020463731,0.00041691714,0.000017232498,0.00033065485,0.4624925,0.0002281539,0.00014818802,0.006230864,0.5095252,0.00009229915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99554825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22976668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22976668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24707817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89336145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494619457","doi":"10.1111/pops.12353","title":"“One Nation Under God”: The System‐Justifying Function of Symbolically Aligning God and Government","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Politics; Presidential system; System justification; Function (biology); Political system; Sociology; Perception; Public opinion; Social psychology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Ideology; Democracy","score_opus":0.06373235188291582,"score_gpt":0.3783498801811698,"score_spread":0.31461752829825396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494619457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97639924,0.00025338502,0.0012367343,0.002969333,0.000022363802,0.000012128865,0.000011033425,0.0000067394662,0.01908901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922717,0.00006729549,0.0003905608,0.00013443915,0.000007945738,0.000005861346,0.0000050633016,0.0000030847557,0.00015857005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604404,0.0030375246,0.00007396705,0.00021472834,0.00039787873,0.00023183927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97711164,0.014824159,0.004901292,0.0011970776,0.001110004,0.00085573713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056830905,0.00018344668,0.00021027609,0.0009972915,0.0017470098,0.002727211,0.000559239,0.0009070785,0.0034675568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030385338,0.00025130608,0.000208266,0.0008289536,0.00722227,0.003650979,0.0023875625,0.0015355466,0.00014458982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012643491,0.0017467205,0.3869167,0.00064740225,0.00022995553,0.00056604104,0.27253762,0.00074560964,0.009123227,0.20826797,0.002331313,0.11562312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018950316,0.00091614027,0.74339235,0.0005225621,0.0003118628,0.00059697224,0.14799021,0.004409734,0.0044773687,0.083540544,0.013553783,0.000098972414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031291177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042854478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056830905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013495332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018139862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030055463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560113952","doi":"10.1111/pops.12379","title":"Negative Affectivity, Political Contention, and Turnout: A Genopolitics Field Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Politics; Turnout; Social psychology; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Test (biology); Negative affectivity; Voting behavior; Positive affectivity; Political science; Voting; Biology; Personality; Ecology","score_opus":0.049543887807910414,"score_gpt":0.4324850149949439,"score_spread":0.3829411271870335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560113952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741036,0.0000151104,0.00019963172,0.000108803186,0.000044785967,0.00038283714,0.00016652801,0.000014254339,0.0016576113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98198444,0.00007485448,0.0030479825,0.00083089975,0.00014150434,0.0032515004,0.00057806907,0.000023549714,0.01006707],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986884,0.00062248064,0.00006291504,0.00029797244,0.00013041757,0.0001979514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478525,0.0022116404,0.0007312724,0.0007411473,0.0001947286,0.0013358807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003091045,0.0013187357,0.0009373535,0.0005192472,0.0024913917,0.0012942738,0.0012253585,0.0017082366,0.010840516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032274013,0.00077674614,0.00043312024,0.00033681808,0.001784079,0.00052753446,0.0009657739,0.002662181,0.0013188198],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11336195,0.5795402,0.10813308,0.00033650605,0.00034882608,0.0009845315,0.007872692,0.0012244628,0.14632246,0.0050029354,0.007740001,0.029132396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028518043,0.4016551,0.5141109,0.00007393142,0.00065139023,0.00065640593,0.00405172,0.006719,0.020657977,0.009895446,0.01269506,0.00031502536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026903679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052167173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010840516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006867618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001011674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036265075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605015151","doi":"10.1111/pops.12412","title":"Exposure to Violence and Attitudes Towards Transitional Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Retributive justice; Transitional justice; Restorative justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Torture; Context (archaeology); Imprisonment; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Human rights; Geography","score_opus":0.09644692490702494,"score_gpt":0.45408578617470374,"score_spread":0.3576388612676788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605015151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99845517,0.00007211779,0.00004618176,0.00010763366,0.0000038378384,0.000003924439,0.00001118633,8.273638e-7,0.0012991434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996043,0.00007191231,0.000028691049,0.000042016505,0.0000044540816,0.0000031371717,0.000016702194,6.225783e-7,0.00022815728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991535,0.00039163188,0.000060003964,0.00009091045,0.00014812833,0.0001557648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944911,0.0016067423,0.0024570674,0.00021781212,0.00026845417,0.0009587793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012816961,0.00015782616,0.00015903907,0.00081161264,0.00077330496,0.0019032476,0.00026868514,0.00060853513,0.0034194235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005394608,0.00018994456,0.00029287595,0.0005326736,0.001439413,0.0005881876,0.0010928655,0.0011240247,0.00023636174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031985986,0.00020672544,0.98578775,0.000018732195,0.000056092733,0.00010836861,0.008614858,0.00008125255,0.00024969233,0.00047324755,0.00012998728,0.0042413645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002732699,0.00010571172,0.9842073,0.000026458923,0.000011836661,0.00019607204,0.0142450845,0.00012564524,0.000081117716,0.00030836285,0.0006796261,0.000010028834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003357387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004614548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034194235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003743289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022187181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011439145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613204184","doi":"10.1111/pops.12428","title":"Deradicalizing Detained Terrorists","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ubisoft (Canada)","funders":"Office of Naval Research; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Tamil; Recidivism; Sri lanka; Terrorism; Criminology; Violent extremism; Political science; Empirical evidence; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.09277652930889792,"score_gpt":0.49413350701719866,"score_spread":0.40135697770830076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613204184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936156,0.00008013093,0.00050314184,0.00043232963,0.000021762111,0.000068665955,0.000012130679,0.000014277426,0.0052519315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974491,0.0001277444,0.00067641103,0.00012883068,0.000017049537,0.000039150687,0.000020840062,0.0000026333619,0.0015382605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905723,0.0005056825,0.000028489201,0.00006130758,0.00008414958,0.00026311306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984492,0.0003437513,0.00043814394,0.0002357196,0.00014268336,0.000390484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014744506,0.00023865158,0.00013659682,0.00043463506,0.0018390127,0.0005966753,0.00039476829,0.00031251184,0.0024106519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004020719,0.00009256173,0.00012663942,0.00022243056,0.0011577912,0.0004947926,0.0016621912,0.0006988954,0.0003280115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008898284,0.0072635934,0.19499293,0.0005041976,0.00015959915,0.00053020165,0.080656156,0.001279872,0.015629241,0.008743436,0.009072827,0.6802782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015549989,0.007455557,0.77132505,0.00031846008,0.00009100788,0.0005358295,0.15513758,0.0016268538,0.009260089,0.0051372256,0.04888358,0.00007328278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024503097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010246788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024503097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000721359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010917198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008064449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780112182","doi":"10.1111/pops.12467","title":"Implementation Intentions, Information, and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Western University; Bishop's University","keywords":"Turnout; Voter registration; Psychological intervention; Voting; Voter turnout; Work (physics); Political science; Survey data collection; Psychology; Public relations; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Politics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1059422353045208,"score_gpt":0.5305363396035376,"score_spread":0.42459410429901684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780112182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996523,0.000019471516,0.00018902656,0.00008152439,0.00003061909,0.0010272636,0.00012989697,0.000014725384,0.0019843876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97911716,0.00011431774,0.0029147523,0.00047873807,0.00009085134,0.006596264,0.00044181698,0.000019865578,0.010226348],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692494,0.0011999278,0.00018410914,0.0005060571,0.0005766834,0.0006083746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711073,0.006792757,0.0019193768,0.0016584372,0.0007675592,0.001751125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550912,0.00095308124,0.0009649649,0.0006164053,0.0027479383,0.001649366,0.0013665115,0.0016205991,0.015269486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010917636,0.0009197526,0.00083379145,0.00048626537,0.0016395007,0.00097430276,0.0011622112,0.003444388,0.0019276968],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03515276,0.85473937,0.045238584,0.00038850226,0.000265833,0.00021767244,0.009188133,0.0006717603,0.01230351,0.0018409824,0.0026738711,0.037319023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037394468,0.49354008,0.42125878,0.00021552129,0.00110421,0.0001955881,0.008648459,0.008408563,0.0115318885,0.0046814317,0.012663786,0.00035736136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01490721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024641763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015269486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017642991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027278478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05108154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788267696","doi":"10.1111/pops.12486","title":"The Nature of Party Categories in Two‐Party and Multiparty Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Left-wing politics; Perspective (graphical); Categorical variable; Political science; Confusion; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Sociology; Political economy; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05238806043342864,"score_gpt":0.44681364804684914,"score_spread":0.3944255876134205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788267696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7858002,0.0013305004,0.038727295,0.0015813574,0.00010181138,0.00014702577,0.00023264952,0.00004524708,0.17203397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957711,0.00008807884,0.0029031795,0.000069891925,0.000019180145,0.00006560187,0.0000793439,0.000009462263,0.0009942133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931781,0.0040120077,0.00029640523,0.00064911303,0.0012914179,0.0005727883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206877,0.0041038105,0.0017282154,0.0008737854,0.0006159157,0.0006095928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002451824,0.00023557026,0.00037814534,0.0026469647,0.0032628821,0.0058081932,0.0006654502,0.00092086836,0.006058742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01161283,0.0002811079,0.00049933174,0.003262933,0.007589698,0.00558975,0.0040644687,0.0011610774,0.00046720845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030305138,0.00018941687,0.07957841,0.0004130283,0.00009893091,0.00034454706,0.075953074,0.0010475384,0.004137687,0.747518,0.0016105763,0.08880574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057398174,0.0001927021,0.26302585,0.00025830252,0.00005131614,0.00088650576,0.06347367,0.005263231,0.0009503918,0.6189225,0.04680457,0.00011359421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016027809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022864365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006058742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014971544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065194914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02026856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792780939","doi":"10.1111/pops.12471","title":"Who Is Afraid of the Chinese State? Evidence Calling into Question Political Fear as an Explanation for Overreporting of Political Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen","keywords":"Politics; Authoritarianism; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Incentive; State (computer science); Psychology; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); China; Institution; Political science; Law; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.06848583646112157,"score_gpt":0.4986479950684142,"score_spread":0.4301621586072926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792780939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955498,0.000115435345,0.00013239487,0.00053135917,0.000011127461,0.000004775745,0.000031195927,0.0000013468718,0.0036225303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976,0.00004234049,0.000013890081,0.000051264593,0.0000053657363,0.0000013880593,0.000012088923,4.792048e-7,0.00011325067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876106,0.00037746583,0.0000958954,0.00020599188,0.00031245302,0.00024719263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128073,0.0030714867,0.0035415227,0.00088449544,0.00074536126,0.00047638972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031688937,0.00017544352,0.0002358289,0.0007920646,0.0010398369,0.0012177258,0.00035827848,0.0005160125,0.003278184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00909193,0.00015302491,0.00034052788,0.0009801801,0.0020877786,0.00085440214,0.00064335926,0.00073780713,0.00014629312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001455015,0.00004705016,0.9731828,0.00005832492,0.00009099339,0.00032755279,0.010577705,0.000053707205,0.0005771068,0.0020774151,0.00040882744,0.01245312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008526175,0.000042715932,0.9893355,0.000028851187,0.00008437968,0.0002131981,0.007260829,0.00064821425,0.00046642395,0.0009443315,0.0009522977,0.000014592779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028166577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023626294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028166577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010326151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008821549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0560053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884413220","doi":"10.1111/pops.12509","title":"Looking Back, Looking Forward: ISPP at 40 and Future Directions for Political Psychology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Warrant; Political psychology; Politics; Presidential system; Presidential address; Field (mathematics); Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Social science; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.037519400214141706,"score_gpt":0.42245472917216514,"score_spread":0.38493532895802346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884413220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021283296,0.026808841,0.00071493373,0.9348398,0.006867999,0.00000538673,0.000030478292,0.000030213001,0.028574068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34596482,0.103947364,0.0058585154,0.457254,0.025180299,0.000115348186,0.00017285983,0.00022316964,0.061283655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920908,0.0050898585,0.00015172466,0.00061728095,0.0011331663,0.00091721845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861574,0.005917657,0.0006872643,0.0006485712,0.002392763,0.0041962676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013802068,0.00062905345,0.0008743902,0.0020140163,0.011932341,0.018128017,0.0013547351,0.009596065,0.018748904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014326711,0.00035107494,0.0006588331,0.0037265082,0.022344127,0.023576038,0.0050324593,0.021245504,0.0038392434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051181574,0.000111576956,0.0017488513,0.00024637542,0.000015612699,0.00018659535,0.009431381,0.00010614974,0.0001510012,0.5300515,0.38258424,0.075315475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011837629,0.000045456534,0.0024678446,0.001061993,0.000012782756,0.00018476082,0.024904639,0.00018816214,0.00014118415,0.39533293,0.57560635,0.000042112813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006713466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092514865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018748904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007891186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015767703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07299316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898583683","doi":"10.1111/pops.12530","title":"Solidarity Not Homogeneity: Constructing a Superordinate Aboriginal Identity That Protects Subgroup Identities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Superordinate goals; Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Identity (music); Sociology; Social identity theory; Gender studies; Social group","score_opus":0.07394934965723589,"score_gpt":0.4461099010027552,"score_spread":0.37216055134551934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898583683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96319014,0.00012843127,0.0054682516,0.0013406567,0.000049285372,0.00004473486,0.000008367864,0.00001794279,0.029752208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645716,0.000036621823,0.0018550446,0.00010072053,0.0000066544367,0.000020258927,0.0000074814707,0.000006652496,0.0015092535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516463,0.0031854722,0.000100885496,0.00032968473,0.00047338338,0.0007460104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951379,0.001184663,0.00084830105,0.0010444963,0.0004576655,0.001327054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067800125,0.00026915537,0.0003221698,0.0007971339,0.007194084,0.003050711,0.00073629554,0.00056685734,0.0024104512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504562,0.00022695679,0.00029464206,0.00052833837,0.008637059,0.0019382401,0.005052437,0.0013731702,0.0002605814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001627247,0.00017293793,0.04737579,0.0001342039,0.000029101207,0.0006011631,0.83264214,0.00014563905,0.0110260025,0.061824974,0.000896594,0.044988737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004160414,0.0006033279,0.14591663,0.0003550975,0.00008463683,0.000904293,0.73122084,0.0013880155,0.0068390695,0.03782413,0.07475252,0.00006992831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012410629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023407666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012410629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022011676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005075761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035856545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969717308","doi":"10.1111/pops.12615","title":"Right‐Wing Ideology as a Predictor of Collective Action: A Test Across Four Political Issue Domains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Social dominance orientation; Ideology; Collective action; Empathy; Social psychology; Authoritarianism; Psychology; Dominance (genetics); Politics; Action (physics); Political science; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.04952121522222076,"score_gpt":0.44624080116698894,"score_spread":0.3967195859447682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969717308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831414,0.000020259109,0.000095225994,0.000044670276,0.0000069055327,0.000015440784,0.000029396791,0.0000021077706,0.0014719241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998965,0.000028045679,0.00028932042,0.000020623494,0.000005770666,0.00004539136,0.00010007766,0.0000018779042,0.0005438303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.0003124008,0.00004941678,0.00015768371,0.00029581378,0.00021812772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932742,0.0029566004,0.0016056565,0.00048551513,0.0005821095,0.0010960061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031688607,0.0004132306,0.00032780392,0.0008334964,0.0013543081,0.0010389403,0.00036286082,0.00066975976,0.0038103885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069232,0.0001947888,0.0007754556,0.0004029991,0.0012016086,0.0005974467,0.001291791,0.0011763872,0.00033449472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003150991,0.0005478396,0.9846586,0.000022634144,0.000096699114,0.00004488661,0.0036783963,0.0002369561,0.001217001,0.000501438,0.0001851798,0.008495259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015720234,0.00014346774,0.9959478,0.000011063297,0.000016345459,0.000015335878,0.0022702566,0.00097135006,0.00014146457,0.00019522593,0.0002672497,0.0000046872974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028333576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039646853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028333576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091135676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016712515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056337297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005617920","doi":"10.1111/pops.12653","title":"What Determines Voting Behaviors of Muslim Minorities in Europe: Muslim Identity or Left‐Right Ideology?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"KU Leuven; Vlaamse regering; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Queen's University Belfast; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Ideology; Turkish; Political science; Religious identity; Disapproval voting; Politics; Identity (music); Disadvantaged; Voting behavior; Authoritarianism; Social psychology; Sociology; Political economy; Democracy; Psychology; Religiosity; Law","score_opus":0.11450532392197998,"score_gpt":0.4471198392212376,"score_spread":0.3326145152992576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005617920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.000037496742,0.000037620997,0.000050681156,0.0000025804495,0.0000015667046,0.000014397148,4.3897288e-7,0.0008739652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997222,0.000027804595,0.000027813057,0.000016984051,0.0000026574571,0.0000010868066,0.000025578618,5.1989434e-7,0.00017543258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960333,0.00018100112,0.000020389014,0.00004745034,0.000036742214,0.00011110965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920005,0.00017632864,0.0003289732,0.00004492949,0.00006995778,0.00017980092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008295366,0.000105226696,0.00015104453,0.00037659533,0.00044180703,0.0007013291,0.00013671149,0.00029864215,0.0020351037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018012929,0.000070254006,0.0001675666,0.00028154027,0.0004118263,0.00033547118,0.00042158997,0.0003138707,0.00028917685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013449539,0.00012405028,0.98439306,0.00001608722,0.000029111143,0.000056162076,0.0031043505,0.0000558664,0.0007080954,0.00041373976,0.00016319107,0.010801753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002667207,0.00004131565,0.9950206,0.000013301486,0.0000064898513,0.000037833914,0.004060405,0.0001718923,0.00012370116,0.00012447534,0.00039407113,0.000003180229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003845845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007863597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003845845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021641444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019238023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076469183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027567544","doi":"10.1111/pops.12667","title":"Social Cure Processes Help Lower Intergroup Anxiety Among Neighborhood Residents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Group cohesiveness; Anxiety; Cohesion (chemistry); Social anxiety; Group conflict; Social group","score_opus":0.057076341569985097,"score_gpt":0.4034680374453425,"score_spread":0.3463916958753574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027567544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980877,0.00010286012,0.00007077601,0.00019184592,0.000012095918,0.000014229413,0.000006862624,0.000013813089,0.0014995812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866164,0.00010449775,0.0002726469,0.000043836608,0.000011860093,0.0000136342815,0.000016306649,0.0000017941479,0.0008736961],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987507,0.00006044235,0.0000042112,0.00001182424,0.000016511149,0.000031899726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997011,0.000060211845,0.000060597,0.000020221752,0.000019479163,0.00013844982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031560296,0.00018447526,0.0001821176,0.00018405815,0.0008101495,0.00038773607,0.00014235378,0.00029018935,0.004040395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001204302,0.00008482382,0.00015410042,0.00005749814,0.00031917653,0.00021488611,0.00052936596,0.00033115296,0.00023740904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027296334,0.033865966,0.2963838,0.00084888143,0.00042889421,0.00065674837,0.039390966,0.0009668784,0.036565237,0.0025555282,0.013120589,0.5724868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039151372,0.010901976,0.9329248,0.00017084993,0.00022675961,0.00021369608,0.02803588,0.0013218417,0.0037174711,0.0016369013,0.020410264,0.00004795621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017082732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007413137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004040395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015041215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026895193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013516426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036782560","doi":"10.1111/pops.12671","title":"The Volatility of Collective Action: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Opposition (politics); Openness to experience; Social psychology; Politics; Social identity theory; Collective identity; Commit; Social movement; Sociology; Social group; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2593020488635236,"score_gpt":0.5310710851010335,"score_spread":0.2717690362375099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036782560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637535,0.0035476456,0.0072503844,0.0014031471,0.000037409656,0.00015426989,0.0010960964,0.00005126667,0.022706194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739057,0.00074321596,0.00097208767,0.00007827345,0.000036875335,0.00009536944,0.0004446437,0.000015104352,0.00022400508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307305,0.0030036417,0.00049237686,0.00097129814,0.0020012842,0.0004583784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8400964,0.1315407,0.01654356,0.006257851,0.0039689397,0.0015925881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009974681,0.0004209623,0.0007077634,0.0056593074,0.0016381361,0.0033075132,0.0017073967,0.0011785862,0.006518786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05956861,0.0004003549,0.0005330327,0.008303841,0.0048756995,0.004502627,0.0028515523,0.0019352022,0.0006471281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067765295,0.0009193602,0.7674891,0.0013723002,0.00036275174,0.0005462578,0.027550265,0.00871518,0.00044911532,0.09279254,0.0071541592,0.09197132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012397037,0.00044248195,0.79224616,0.0009131257,0.00018570392,0.001000376,0.04734293,0.032953084,0.00068416836,0.096303605,0.027657898,0.0001466294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004202657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025026596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009974681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020406332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097655365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05275172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111796108","doi":"10.1111/pops.12718","title":"Are there Local Differences in Support for Violent Radicalization? A Study on College Students in the Province of Quebec, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Radicalization; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social support; Social psychology; Mainstream; Diversity (politics); Social environment; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Medicine; Social science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.05226607974761614,"score_gpt":0.38681310555121645,"score_spread":0.3345470258036003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111796108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997615,0.00022290226,0.000044262175,0.0003610719,0.000009177438,0.000037634778,0.0003657002,0.0000030619142,0.0013412819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985434,0.00015633769,0.000054297616,0.00015094098,0.0000039777124,0.00002112069,0.00020875692,0.0000023918033,0.0008588067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00013003765,0.00003846821,0.00014009241,0.00016792325,0.00045108324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752635,0.00026122437,0.00040187538,0.00006704141,0.00076013635,0.0009833388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009049584,0.00039544867,0.0005410789,0.001322591,0.0070987935,0.0019960448,0.0014476741,0.00064459635,0.0040302915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021798946,0.0003773351,0.0005571194,0.0031342146,0.0019026877,0.0006983315,0.0011783369,0.001276846,0.00038657643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009175547,0.00028785304,0.9665882,0.000054994744,0.000045578377,0.00020908129,0.02096412,0.000072020586,0.00035532462,0.00022492863,0.0016680816,0.009437915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009184987,0.00005918575,0.9651069,0.000055986962,0.000016822587,0.00003756203,0.03320054,0.00015393987,0.000046453617,0.000025720215,0.0012698901,0.000017670825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99366826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03129763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03129763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027580103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2270813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157246042","doi":"10.1111/pops.12744","title":"Authoritarians Go with the Flow: Social Norms Moderate the Link between Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Outgroup‐Directed Attitudes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Prejudice (legal term); Authoritarianism; Social psychology; Psychology; Prosocial behavior; Democracy; Political science","score_opus":0.05054203985400755,"score_gpt":0.3778270188174454,"score_spread":0.32728497896343783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157246042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991654,0.000018481887,0.000058013837,0.00002671436,0.0000024203043,0.0000015790864,0.000005959427,8.9141156e-7,0.0007206439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997274,0.00001631795,0.000050240782,0.000016922895,0.000003159321,0.0000018115172,0.0000111395975,0.0000010076642,0.00017181075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965477,0.00019335741,0.000013452637,0.00004389481,0.0000469536,0.00004759768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647635,0.0011097932,0.0014396121,0.00027941057,0.00015690232,0.0005379106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082450494,0.00023190964,0.00014961096,0.00036161454,0.00036650116,0.0007488272,0.00012567776,0.00025499184,0.0025933685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004215596,0.00015453185,0.00010301308,0.00013853477,0.0006417475,0.00038988533,0.000556325,0.0005416617,0.00016907623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005574709,0.00093350123,0.9734537,0.00003899788,0.00013262471,0.00010338757,0.0040233866,0.00022491845,0.008473153,0.0009770069,0.00019325547,0.0108886445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011043155,0.0001350959,0.9969894,0.000008753375,0.000017593877,0.00004437563,0.0010853668,0.0002561439,0.0006545874,0.00052401936,0.00026883616,0.000004785055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014403008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028137888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025933685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013386577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026422145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008675694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160039548","doi":"10.1111/pops.12751","title":"The Role of Humanitarianism in Shaping Public Attitudes Toward Refugees","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Situational ethics; Politics; Natural disaster; Attitude; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07612763880659011,"score_gpt":0.412920168072721,"score_spread":0.3367925292661309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160039548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977902,0.000028003293,0.00007996606,0.00012567945,0.0000028971385,0.0000040239706,0.0000052291375,0.0000010378907,0.0019630103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999859,0.000018254928,0.000024339659,0.000013798399,0.0000014722643,0.0000017894325,0.0000040360883,4.0553928e-7,0.00007702458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989207,0.0006383395,0.000044362183,0.0000765325,0.0001293518,0.00019075705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609405,0.0012792149,0.0014494316,0.0002333945,0.0002712952,0.00067262916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018496467,0.00019758155,0.00014233221,0.0005791092,0.0010138033,0.0017857807,0.00018290644,0.00035158606,0.002569868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048849722,0.00015133386,0.0002483023,0.00029911887,0.0017357499,0.0005954786,0.001097608,0.0007627056,0.000119052864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015740773,0.00056188385,0.94711417,0.00004473897,0.000065144435,0.00020570113,0.03386035,0.000112821064,0.0011104159,0.0015153579,0.00021949229,0.015032547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008879279,0.00011929813,0.9553897,0.000029504266,0.000017348699,0.00009454312,0.04262939,0.00020390682,0.00016553272,0.0005958698,0.0007356158,0.000010327125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024132712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005160815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002569868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005714535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050493405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009782016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185455682","doi":"10.1111/pops.12774","title":"The COVID‐19–Social Identity–Digital Media Nexus in India: Polarization and Blame","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Social psychology; Political science; Social media; Polarization (electrochemistry); Social identity theory; Psychology; Politics; Collective identity; Sociology; Social group; Law","score_opus":0.05269653616262123,"score_gpt":0.42449327092436606,"score_spread":0.37179673476174485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185455682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991495,0.00005600071,0.00017699697,0.00054916565,0.000022756823,0.000026305392,0.00095495326,0.0000068649333,0.0067117913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485683,0.000079287915,0.00017979393,0.00017485223,0.00001635308,0.000056755107,0.00059475214,0.000005336316,0.004036115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945587,0.0001684944,0.000018008148,0.000041866126,0.00008297149,0.00023288823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978568,0.00074439065,0.00058824685,0.00024230914,0.00024263425,0.00032556697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007133098,0.00019554507,0.00018348549,0.0010789488,0.0025324575,0.001337047,0.00042123185,0.0003252023,0.01878639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018572384,0.00019367872,0.00039252738,0.0018249891,0.0009012145,0.0010083416,0.0020315922,0.0018318021,0.0015958925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008730669,0.0003215047,0.9629941,0.000072934046,0.00005859471,0.00021469202,0.014104192,0.00010939846,0.00022798924,0.0020450149,0.0047898483,0.014974432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007002808,0.00009324086,0.92770433,0.000054545548,0.000048882375,0.00020199214,0.06308012,0.0003762078,0.00027970536,0.00054601755,0.007592873,0.000015007681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05380842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06841961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05380842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075960037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015387044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10699046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192609491","doi":"10.1111/pops.12777","title":"Prejudice, Political Ideology, and Interest: Understanding Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action in Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften; Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Affirmative action; Redress; Politics; Prejudice (legal term); Ideology; Social psychology; Equity (law); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.35266144538745897,"score_gpt":0.5244543064759383,"score_spread":0.1717928610884793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192609491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99042106,0.0002386367,0.00015262802,0.0013575155,0.000005367707,0.000013058858,0.000018255783,0.0000013595694,0.007792266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960047,0.000107728665,0.00005420586,0.00005929692,0.0000022211154,0.000004992918,0.0000062195786,6.607767e-7,0.00016416809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.0006570439,0.000049614984,0.0001233971,0.00023604026,0.00026333323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928948,0.0036129474,0.0020612953,0.0003417947,0.00042527015,0.00066382845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042032376,0.0002144581,0.00031390542,0.0013122726,0.0020287663,0.0021595429,0.0003889281,0.0005819893,0.0019129397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012777165,0.00025879973,0.00028089384,0.0011723773,0.003931269,0.0013577085,0.0020123331,0.0010124573,0.00010623166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006702323,0.00027394271,0.76282644,0.00008802177,0.000045231405,0.00014515297,0.19194864,0.0001622096,0.0011393981,0.020184474,0.0003819291,0.022737535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015669795,0.00008977736,0.85408235,0.0002471788,0.00006196082,0.000111563306,0.12813255,0.0014850339,0.00040837598,0.008220929,0.0071194596,0.000025129542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051813155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084743455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051813155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023643058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019743473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10302311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204578711","doi":"10.1111/pops.12783","title":"“The More You Know”: Critical Historical Knowledge About Indian Residential Schools Increases Non‐Indigenous Canadians' Empathy for Indigenous Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Empathy; Indigenous; Harm; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Outgroup; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02576950892754636,"score_gpt":0.39129321870693595,"score_spread":0.3655237097793896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204578711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842498,0.0007423404,0.00021344282,0.0021920148,0.000026228225,0.00003636816,0.000022228125,0.000010545815,0.0125070065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758625,0.0006751946,0.00030421422,0.00038910145,0.000007739239,0.000012975641,0.000013029718,0.0000023389464,0.0010091946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987375,0.0005096456,0.000027721291,0.00010834121,0.00033344212,0.00028334185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969446,0.0010638698,0.0006394143,0.00015102228,0.0005695528,0.0006316483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024168405,0.0002013024,0.00024145599,0.0004279744,0.0041321055,0.0017867788,0.000620132,0.00057661696,0.004546619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007903885,0.0001368598,0.00031427463,0.0003688167,0.0025625096,0.0010135918,0.001470681,0.0011432312,0.00013100356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009904968,0.003604387,0.22481017,0.0029653998,0.0005012119,0.00079586,0.4208751,0.00064237526,0.0091989385,0.007482911,0.01258541,0.3155478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014312462,0.0007794671,0.6823691,0.0017328232,0.00090988085,0.0002889347,0.2684632,0.0005966527,0.003670798,0.0034025032,0.037505027,0.00013844967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49348655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69639796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5065135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056912797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154307885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212548316","doi":"10.1111/pops.12785","title":"A Radical Vision of Radicalism: Political Cynicism, not Incrementally Stronger Partisan Positions, Explains Political Radicalization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Cynicism; Radicalization; Political radicalism; Politics; Ideology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Political economy; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0464815268164771,"score_gpt":0.42555841390150423,"score_spread":0.3790768870850271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212548316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7239731,0.0010365031,0.043038905,0.05018761,0.0004221163,0.00009871859,0.00010629836,0.00012235729,0.1810144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682957,0.000067700304,0.0011297491,0.0006727643,0.00008117725,0.000016688648,0.000013274843,0.000014060651,0.0011750568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889344,0.00037641524,0.00003467584,0.00023269969,0.000193649,0.00026924527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536705,0.0015614649,0.0013149328,0.0006654566,0.0004602782,0.0006307625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002452349,0.0003407027,0.00033157467,0.0011401073,0.0013595374,0.0037,0.00085329404,0.0017121118,0.0048668357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059804097,0.00022803612,0.00046353697,0.00048497668,0.009955793,0.004411939,0.0030078813,0.0027340802,0.0004783725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031835533,0.0002803018,0.07835351,0.00022927344,0.00006853715,0.0006170511,0.024543082,0.0008543568,0.005867097,0.8430962,0.004219299,0.041552957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008265777,0.00023814078,0.09097606,0.00017736657,0.000060887716,0.0006858271,0.011113998,0.0074466923,0.00208702,0.87165093,0.01540339,0.00007700158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069019635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006704799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048668357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011477021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090853515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016281188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W34548719","doi":"10.1111/pops.12775","title":"Sedimentology of Composite Sand-and-Gravel Beach-Shoreface Complexes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Geological formations and processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Swash; Geology; Intertidal zone; Beach morphodynamics; Longshore drift; Sedimentary depositional environment; Sedimentary rock; Sedimentology; Deposition (geology); Sedimentary structures; Shoal; Shore; Sediment transport; Sediment; Beach ridge; Clastic rock; Geomorphology; Surf zone; Rip current; Oceanography; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.03464206637995873,"score_gpt":0.31573922261624665,"score_spread":0.28109715623628795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W34548719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602142,0.0012332209,0.0028439364,0.0006750047,0.00037752913,0.00008501185,0.002764744,0.00019483137,0.031611674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900851,0.00043161822,0.0018977352,0.000096619086,0.00007636008,0.000021456488,0.0007775687,0.000134511,0.0064789956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956113,0.000028419481,0.000063097454,0.00011222515,0.00015817606,0.00007687969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925023,0.00008772569,0.00014478977,0.000047571797,0.00032480323,0.00014481574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002456574,0.00044155607,0.00056149776,0.004729206,0.002401379,0.003088363,0.00071292446,0.00088927004,0.0073624793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016654172,0.0004169392,0.00037775116,0.0045132423,0.0009369414,0.00090386445,0.0016907534,0.0006538922,0.0012316979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009344006,0.00014745121,0.83882046,0.0006633846,0.0004443279,0.004824176,0.00574661,0.009007459,0.03261504,0.0066409297,0.010845426,0.08931038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017761497,0.00004927114,0.97240055,0.000056518744,0.000059937283,0.00047333894,0.0036637755,0.0035102693,0.0017710136,0.0007517034,0.017203538,0.000042328847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030237028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06378001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030237028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009803057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006436319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060122013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200533649","doi":"10.1111/pops.12798","title":"A Social Identity Approach to How Elite Outgroups Are Invoked by Politicians and the Media in Nativist Populism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Department for the Economy","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Elite; Populism; Identity (music); Political science; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Politics; Collective identity; Social group; Prejudice (legal term); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.054941150622392194,"score_gpt":0.3904049228233291,"score_spread":0.3354637722009369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200533649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49859846,0.001418096,0.010110399,0.010165848,0.00020604338,0.000052588704,0.000029060664,0.0000397435,0.47937968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940315,0.0001798889,0.0004880376,0.00035424234,0.000050860723,0.000015853904,0.000004400372,0.000012485716,0.0048626247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967886,0.002320555,0.00005068406,0.00025250547,0.00027647114,0.00031112958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667525,0.0021034617,0.0005764521,0.00018781135,0.0001774031,0.00027962893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036071849,0.0003729186,0.00018034637,0.00307367,0.0066886456,0.008084884,0.00061950024,0.0011423575,0.0030827746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004397344,0.00023493683,0.0002126719,0.0010615516,0.027142098,0.004520492,0.0046526343,0.0015001791,0.00023337048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040421466,0.000047046447,0.0062864483,0.00007326324,0.000011107108,0.00033969633,0.455167,0.00009701035,0.001123826,0.5220442,0.0008219159,0.013948033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004986386,0.00013584242,0.034256432,0.00045190693,0.0000549405,0.0006541638,0.47489408,0.0012234346,0.002695151,0.30627206,0.1792604,0.00005169074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045263153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004058019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008084884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029657967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012505745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02151841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221025312","doi":"10.1111/pops.12820","title":"Overestimating Reported Prejudice Causes Democrats to Believe Disadvantaged Groups Are Less Electable","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Prejudice (legal term); Presidential system; Social psychology; Psychology; Democracy; Presidential election; Inequality; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08704083300802831,"score_gpt":0.4350971798835651,"score_spread":0.34805634687553677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221025312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99535036,0.000090689486,0.00011712633,0.00021992729,0.000012051636,0.0000065044774,0.00003167329,0.000008157742,0.0041634273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888057,0.00008276154,0.00013123499,0.00018189444,0.000015103017,0.000005376469,0.00006652182,0.000003970819,0.0006324767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946505,0.00018420527,0.000034276163,0.000084051804,0.00015488343,0.00007749761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506146,0.0012351715,0.0024733131,0.00053434697,0.00024561954,0.0004499657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094342645,0.0002534713,0.0003048396,0.0006987862,0.0007054197,0.0009453128,0.00012563379,0.00047328757,0.0053020054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005712008,0.00027448215,0.00030758965,0.0003134293,0.00058155676,0.00026750346,0.00057101384,0.0008598845,0.00046565535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000188319,0.0003836852,0.9806315,0.000048883812,0.00012971023,0.00013842325,0.0015382782,0.000105404324,0.0033477098,0.00025450683,0.0006630036,0.012570469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012290249,0.00009660431,0.9976655,0.000013549737,0.000034454857,0.00012423465,0.00052945776,0.00012828833,0.00040716934,0.00029594568,0.000687114,0.0000053792683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027158195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006067702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053020054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024139867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017736971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221115207","doi":"10.1111/pops.12803","title":"Abortion Attitudes: An Overview of Demographic and Ideological Differences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Religiosity; Ideology; Conservatism; Social psychology; Psychology; Openness to experience; Developmental psychology; Politics; Gender studies; Demography; Sociology; Pregnancy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16313045659089265,"score_gpt":0.46854347765141974,"score_spread":0.3054130210605271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221115207","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09227095,0.8978399,0.0007956593,0.0020276438,0.00014342184,0.00004335951,0.00092549564,0.000011160649,0.0059424373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20145798,0.79520875,0.0009182342,0.000755607,0.00024490317,0.000088050365,0.0008879323,0.000009932891,0.00042855472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902415,0.00040237213,0.00014855106,0.00016823268,0.00021295382,0.00004373754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946398,0.0036288481,0.00092677143,0.00009365775,0.0005786235,0.00013235447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024442377,0.0002205357,0.0006645097,0.004172029,0.0002850928,0.00082280027,0.00028752766,0.00035204706,0.0013805894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048763542,0.0002252945,0.0005796794,0.0039039967,0.0005782664,0.0011067041,0.0005785986,0.00070093287,0.00019943721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015500003,0.00010031423,0.18236433,0.010556414,0.0007829445,0.00015941715,0.0038047296,0.00016146437,0.00055265514,0.0027699377,0.0040407325,0.79455215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011447908,0.00022800924,0.8961175,0.01048163,0.00075771706,0.001438932,0.0044352864,0.00015825989,0.0004880474,0.0018304597,0.08400043,0.000052248728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027053992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043770117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004172029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005828528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008822805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012926519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281287521","doi":"10.1111/pops.12819","title":"Does Analytic Thinking Insulate Against Pro‐Kremlin Disinformation? Evidence From Ukraine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Sociology; Operationalization; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Social media","score_opus":0.07211554270550284,"score_gpt":0.4174371051439383,"score_spread":0.3453215624384354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281287521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99768734,0.00016817573,0.00005942238,0.000176453,0.00000263086,0.00000154647,0.000022751754,9.229834e-7,0.0018807953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997515,0.000073027455,0.000019913312,0.000032197677,0.0000023183213,6.623878e-7,0.00001793081,8.833062e-7,0.000101524434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984597,0.00073474104,0.00010629336,0.00019919574,0.00024232284,0.00025780723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97890145,0.010609772,0.006894976,0.0014296767,0.0014578655,0.00070623873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028924085,0.00018445028,0.00026641716,0.00096750475,0.0009909576,0.0015366591,0.00040454126,0.0004945584,0.002298557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015909856,0.00017434955,0.00024504686,0.00082734285,0.0022307562,0.0013315824,0.00160177,0.0009050097,0.00025381276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053190556,0.0001520673,0.9177705,0.00014498188,0.00018245463,0.00038081285,0.056507047,0.00017411436,0.0009230674,0.0032877747,0.0003754508,0.019569768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001152371,0.000093724506,0.9719782,0.00009927018,0.000072751085,0.00023567754,0.023664454,0.00021252214,0.0007292693,0.0007261657,0.0021645464,0.000011926875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140090855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013132372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140090855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006851739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080886635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027855098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283642277","doi":"10.1111/pops.12851","title":"Projection in the Face of Centrism: Voter Inferences About Candidates' Party Affiliation in Low‐Information Contexts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Loughborough University; European Commission","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Salience (neuroscience); Politics; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Categorization; Psychology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Geography; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.041879343428919136,"score_gpt":0.4000259457749837,"score_spread":0.35814660234606455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283642277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99586016,0.00001803258,0.00034367523,0.00013218896,0.0000025307534,0.0000074210525,0.000022585593,0.0000021101564,0.0036113004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996984,0.000012009536,0.000107171596,0.000026659212,0.0000034315453,0.000003884666,0.00002747283,0.0000014419808,0.0001195231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722266,0.0017798415,0.000098283366,0.0003504622,0.00031939373,0.00022933568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850248,0.009585832,0.003069206,0.00096531643,0.0008044595,0.00055031665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040298398,0.00017144807,0.0003552052,0.0007955146,0.0013567887,0.0033200176,0.0003301398,0.00076229393,0.0033909723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02602873,0.00032905606,0.0001996107,0.00060003204,0.0017850396,0.0017687087,0.0022069435,0.0010814473,0.00034504637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002777903,0.0005160256,0.88010573,0.00019880904,0.000105465115,0.0005925432,0.04552169,0.0010819513,0.015431743,0.010253258,0.0007818156,0.042632993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005702283,0.00043247014,0.94732356,0.000047769612,0.00007144712,0.00027467895,0.03322923,0.0038435669,0.0035158903,0.009432406,0.0017201179,0.000051824056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033743877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004806558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040298398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006007943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033580716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021312058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317910246","doi":"10.1111/pops.12882","title":"Motivated to Forgive? Partisan Scandals and Party Supporters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Motivated reasoning; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Appearance of impropriety; Political psychology; Social psychology; Cynicism; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10327722760853049,"score_gpt":0.4657300898891332,"score_spread":0.36245286228060275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317910246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969651,0.000017222206,0.00007791616,0.00007047447,0.000003380517,0.0000073482315,0.000007750251,0.0000015536198,0.0028492352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957913,0.000011493496,0.00006164491,0.000039048176,0.0000030985254,0.0000053280146,0.0000098888695,0.0000013229645,0.00028908747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834585,0.0008934586,0.000063640655,0.00016716543,0.00026920368,0.00026068115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98850656,0.004738021,0.004626208,0.0005309839,0.0006748943,0.0009232932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027532475,0.00017799834,0.00023464735,0.00070351304,0.0013660899,0.0027812042,0.00022986323,0.0008129427,0.0034317626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011313316,0.00022025075,0.00021756018,0.00029874666,0.0013036634,0.0006456431,0.0007529771,0.0010105522,0.00032935294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095118565,0.0013329976,0.93237555,0.00008786615,0.0001461186,0.00033972107,0.032499243,0.0003718983,0.0068911808,0.00453636,0.0006068219,0.019860953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003109479,0.0003176672,0.9735773,0.000020501151,0.00002972274,0.00010871172,0.020379612,0.0006947098,0.00085455726,0.0017099387,0.002232305,0.0000438844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030868778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072381007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034317626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056848733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035643217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014560699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319794021","doi":"10.1111/pops.12880","title":"Gender Gap in Parental Leave Intentions: Evidence from 37 Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Economic and Social Research Council; Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jilin Office of Philosophy and Social Science; Masarykova Univerzita; Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Canada Research Chairs; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Parental leave; Gender gap; Gender equality; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Demographic economics; Unpaid work; Politics; Inequality; Gender inequality; Gender role; Sociocultural evolution; Family Leave; Social psychology; Political science; Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.20700775015865736,"score_gpt":0.4550636125385983,"score_spread":0.24805586237994093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319794021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895863,0.0060340334,0.00016504138,0.00021519995,0.000032083582,0.000011240111,0.00097279146,0.000003114968,0.0029802755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760616,0.0016698259,0.000060309107,0.000073092626,0.000006194113,0.000013940438,0.0004299481,0.0000036108831,0.00013703627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978397,0.00084399356,0.00026265412,0.00040746573,0.00027603173,0.0003701213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933908,0.00270169,0.0023112856,0.00053977245,0.00063703203,0.00041949254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039605056,0.00024688215,0.00048409033,0.0016552734,0.0007437454,0.0011635748,0.0004761313,0.00032379036,0.0020106072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006331447,0.00034306524,0.0005416826,0.0030208258,0.0010957025,0.0008354062,0.0018380099,0.0004362265,0.00023675463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009681478,0.000022826083,0.9812011,0.00022087045,0.00016771432,0.00009464596,0.0059381034,0.000063765445,0.000056858487,0.0004452635,0.00048596205,0.011205924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070287424,0.000041313637,0.9891093,0.00031997994,0.00006579737,0.0000831641,0.00821719,0.00003392671,0.0000610982,0.00009538367,0.0019584547,0.0000072447315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023141762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03389441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023141762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004317132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005832404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04601413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379932769","doi":"10.1111/pops.12900","title":"Projection in Politicians' Perceptions of Public Opinion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Projection (relational algebra); Public opinion; Perception; Subject (documents); Democracy; European Social Survey; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.19950825549682394,"score_gpt":0.5094821716568896,"score_spread":0.30997391616006564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379932769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903804,0.00010881193,0.0008764703,0.00031798944,0.000010834373,0.000008443035,0.000043681102,0.00000819361,0.0082450975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997279,0.000028665032,0.00008287496,0.000017455633,0.0000051604065,0.000002702549,0.000030384024,0.0000017075283,0.00010319328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107915,0.0057682493,0.000472093,0.00062681263,0.0015265248,0.000527142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768673,0.0138354935,0.0051982254,0.0013088655,0.002184059,0.0006061183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008924604,0.00016397408,0.0002819722,0.0013205577,0.0007463148,0.002777596,0.00022742554,0.0004439502,0.002112601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03408809,0.00021780594,0.00033572922,0.0015098958,0.002359884,0.0017164408,0.002377721,0.0008956766,0.00025839094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004558364,0.000067792425,0.89632416,0.000095694406,0.00014186646,0.0001755903,0.049266674,0.0008428653,0.0011169453,0.0062120548,0.00085240265,0.044448126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014933435,0.00012455684,0.95494145,0.000048668433,0.00002646092,0.00017203094,0.036330447,0.0015286638,0.00042186212,0.004223188,0.002134709,0.00003303684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026150257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028953392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008924604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007473019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043662486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047198355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390611341","doi":"10.1111/pops.12952","title":"Political leaders' identity leadership and civic citizenship behavior: The mediating role of trust in fellow citizens and the moderating role of economic inequality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Identity (music); Inequality; Context (archaeology); Politics; Organizational citizenship behavior; Social psychology; Civic engagement; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.09082416894108208,"score_gpt":0.4124991193355544,"score_spread":0.3216749503944723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390611341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978137,0.000055180273,0.00013364627,0.00011801399,0.000004150991,0.0000027242163,0.000018990193,0.0000011047347,0.0018524493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99988496,0.00001295538,0.000021997403,0.00000529774,0.0000017052414,0.0000013836716,0.000007828805,2.3928513e-7,0.00006360074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885106,0.0006807347,0.000034619716,0.00009445032,0.00010855367,0.00023051996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929796,0.002900987,0.0023120414,0.0003310231,0.0003527172,0.0011235669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018048022,0.00018943018,0.00022458161,0.00055250264,0.00069422345,0.0011961631,0.00020778639,0.00021476056,0.0036554672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063745244,0.00011705165,0.00018700406,0.00045688672,0.00084337936,0.0006203821,0.0014274917,0.0006942274,0.00011785918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076840224,0.00018328204,0.9891109,0.000017500148,0.000059223075,0.00007542331,0.001622139,0.00013678538,0.00018394957,0.0010323877,0.00020643737,0.00729511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062772733,0.000054013173,0.99489754,0.000027213664,0.000026697562,0.00002901162,0.003321373,0.0006586493,0.00013388444,0.0004137542,0.00042825274,0.0000032702817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005247519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008914716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005247519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004295302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005928908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012228727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392002420","doi":"10.1111/pops.12959","title":"Lay theories of place effects","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Place Attachment and Urban Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024402389268183174,"score_gpt":0.4389142663378299,"score_spread":0.4145118770696467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392002420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47552526,0.0015124911,0.042413607,0.015607071,0.00017827391,0.000053639396,0.0001867995,0.000054331595,0.4644685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811906,0.00014827403,0.00036688338,0.00015938217,0.00002620079,0.000007497701,0.000015428908,0.0000032399803,0.0011540205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.0005807029,0.000033445835,0.00015917739,0.000430448,0.00022498447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557847,0.002349872,0.0006463525,0.00059330266,0.00053502293,0.00029700858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023670134,0.0003982687,0.000272867,0.0014177597,0.0015504764,0.003613592,0.0008700909,0.0009681572,0.010898652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051375926,0.00021059332,0.00041962133,0.0009020121,0.014536911,0.0027144924,0.0031984095,0.0017499585,0.00035435797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065102526,0.00007950707,0.019073965,0.000094830815,0.00003785111,0.000107976986,0.007877384,0.00193526,0.00048377394,0.956025,0.00078380236,0.013435635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050781375,0.00011632334,0.071818665,0.00023058374,0.00008116117,0.00013574192,0.017533692,0.0053049964,0.0007812414,0.8846976,0.019216929,0.00003233203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011677678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010321336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011677678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031850094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010078389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036459625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392754693","doi":"10.1111/pops.12974","title":"What explains elite affective polarization? Evidence from Canadian politicians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Collegio Carlo Alberto","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Elite; Legislature; Politics; Hostility; Political science; Social psychology; Ideology; Psychology; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0755003214654273,"score_gpt":0.44190961559965064,"score_spread":0.36640929413422335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392754693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743196,0.00047253357,0.00014465449,0.0018728585,0.00003228346,0.000039854185,0.0007524586,0.000003989596,0.022361761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798834,0.00024089562,0.000056182467,0.00028341298,0.000015005977,0.000014746826,0.00031525534,0.0000038296325,0.0010823517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968822,0.00049183593,0.00008646758,0.00031581084,0.0009986361,0.0012251188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852638,0.0031603016,0.0023562035,0.0006538977,0.00655048,0.0020153401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004532371,0.00026497096,0.00048470838,0.003500385,0.008661136,0.0034378916,0.0011100956,0.0009148825,0.006243732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01566384,0.00030321672,0.00036424803,0.006559832,0.0027720185,0.0007049768,0.0016010473,0.0012803936,0.00047206655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018898518,0.00009658828,0.9560733,0.000086605534,0.00005110287,0.000110559406,0.021988114,0.00008133952,0.00022930386,0.0028178631,0.0053849197,0.012891445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009064234,0.000011735608,0.9709609,0.000067458765,0.00002366111,0.000021087119,0.021996051,0.00016202591,0.00007313932,0.00030118242,0.0063570426,0.000016557831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029686213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020038685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018380785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14539152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392884980","doi":"10.1111/pops.12962","title":"Urban Colombian youths' perspectives on the armed conflict and possibilities for ways forward","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Armed conflict; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09916917407247554,"score_gpt":0.4192892951710194,"score_spread":0.3201201210985439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392884980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99317235,0.0005119845,0.000090136,0.000554347,0.00001351516,0.000009287956,0.00003662111,0.0000026952375,0.00560897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905723,0.0002862053,0.00003912707,0.000059438917,0.000003462625,0.000008108951,0.0000139166095,0.0000016331718,0.0005309918],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999087,0.00048617987,0.000030301826,0.00005652215,0.00008548348,0.0002545716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990551,0.00033984665,0.00024383175,0.000020692341,0.00012550547,0.00021503471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012446032,0.00035790345,0.00030722626,0.0010552458,0.004321687,0.004398584,0.0004004198,0.00059472816,0.0024535612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013611628,0.00022445146,0.00015006574,0.0006801089,0.0025307308,0.001114632,0.0018233731,0.0012159171,0.00012093507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003478613,0.000054835196,0.077613205,0.000087402135,0.000007273866,0.0007809512,0.90902066,0.00005015743,0.00096442323,0.0037623849,0.0009302632,0.006693767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021096291,0.000015902804,0.032805692,0.0000642691,0.000005444124,0.00014003873,0.9580053,0.00004326926,0.00011475435,0.00012772286,0.008665632,0.000009864318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040256314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10142977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040256314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027919966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013933855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08004403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401883263","doi":"10.1111/pops.13024","title":"A fair go? How belief in a just world shaped attitudes, intentions, and behaviors before and after the Australian referendum on a First Nations voice to parliament","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Just-world hypothesis; Referendum; Economic Justice; Parliament; Context (archaeology); Politics; Social psychology; Perception; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06875347053643784,"score_gpt":0.41842218232118483,"score_spread":0.349668711784747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401883263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99925333,0.000016916161,0.000029079369,0.00015565843,0.000005854605,0.0000036890463,0.0000128727215,5.144607e-7,0.0005221553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992181,0.000014058659,0.000027135655,0.00004185006,0.0000021902677,0.000006625456,0.000017344108,7.151767e-7,0.00067203486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991683,0.00036909035,0.000023845303,0.00012176695,0.00009248305,0.00022465701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968329,0.0007956437,0.00094262324,0.00022346324,0.00031820318,0.00088717014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027107424,0.00012937657,0.00022793484,0.00031243227,0.0016077512,0.001549202,0.0003715055,0.00079963845,0.00454011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00579794,0.0002765133,0.0004141408,0.00023923663,0.0012148722,0.00064198393,0.0008045078,0.0019014502,0.00042199105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016158794,0.0007975193,0.969913,0.000012843296,0.000053758293,0.000076800796,0.022636961,0.0000716649,0.0005840766,0.0006587053,0.000554791,0.0044782897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043947775,0.00011407456,0.98735005,0.000021162597,0.000014168588,0.000013913609,0.011353062,0.00028333176,0.000110678164,0.00022825784,0.0004989322,0.000007961527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07270565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097843006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07270565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000888418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012256457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14456493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402003721","doi":"10.1111/pops.13028","title":"How collective punishment harm intergroup relations through ingroup homogeneity, perceived fairness, and counter‐collective action: A registered report","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Social psychology; Collective action; Psychology; Harm; Group cohesiveness; Punishment (psychology); Group conflict; Perception; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12192822656525126,"score_gpt":0.4368983961522032,"score_spread":0.31497016958695195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402003721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993826,0.000055271674,0.000104701416,0.000023960143,0.0000032182006,0.0000036349527,0.000005554542,6.070637e-7,0.00042045186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998086,0.000024447045,0.00004749821,0.0000073593574,0.0000022418653,0.0000022613583,0.00000468748,3.742583e-7,0.00010255603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879175,0.00076975435,0.00006520996,0.00011835249,0.00015368461,0.000101205405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931016,0.0031821597,0.0025196013,0.00050520163,0.00040043652,0.00029104788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024134421,0.0002338293,0.00018569383,0.0003425502,0.0005905815,0.00071356277,0.00023504414,0.00029718876,0.0017958422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006082196,0.000106947,0.0002426309,0.00021164872,0.0007750641,0.00036434893,0.0004933418,0.00045123367,0.00008085568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007925626,0.001638611,0.9568738,0.00013208331,0.00033656956,0.00021487442,0.004606221,0.0003989181,0.0044717207,0.0010871873,0.00035344934,0.029093985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017734366,0.00075395574,0.9935381,0.000023019595,0.000127109,0.0001443531,0.0023217362,0.0006296458,0.0015815502,0.00037091205,0.00047855973,0.000013322428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002135201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033082017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024134421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037351833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038025374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012763619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402644199","doi":"10.1111/pops.13034","title":"Online political adverts: The effect of disclosures and opportunities for clandestine campaigning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Politics; Advertising; Political science; Psychology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.10013038740417937,"score_gpt":0.4517083502690186,"score_spread":0.3515779628648392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402644199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915308,0.00009983423,0.0001252246,0.00022750994,0.00003459295,0.00002957013,0.000071619565,0.000014473407,0.007866366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987159,0.000044105025,0.00014652587,0.00008722898,0.000026778898,0.000025203299,0.000041140607,0.000014053926,0.0008991176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557686,0.0028522988,0.00023208106,0.00050197396,0.00045526886,0.00038165535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83875674,0.1335323,0.018497033,0.003469043,0.0014521634,0.004292826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038290336,0.00038477595,0.0004304502,0.00046749288,0.00086160726,0.0033046487,0.00042238244,0.0015676148,0.0186725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05954765,0.00036872918,0.00042479875,0.00035200664,0.001355643,0.0017017152,0.0016121254,0.0020964316,0.0009627004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07160019,0.024110949,0.684684,0.0023032834,0.0011462148,0.0017633499,0.030309103,0.0039071348,0.06493109,0.010092155,0.00446345,0.10068913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059488526,0.006698456,0.970759,0.00017777593,0.0004343533,0.00021238778,0.0072446023,0.0023515215,0.005885586,0.002227015,0.0033275248,0.000086903645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008195033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086355396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0186725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047834308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032156036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062465727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403040259","doi":"10.1111/pops.13044","title":"On the relationship between age and conspiracy beliefs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.21085388279231304,"score_gpt":0.48340660087866255,"score_spread":0.2725527180863495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403040259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613175,0.034146123,0.0007204622,0.0007885534,0.00007801543,0.000029487099,0.0007488364,0.000007488014,0.0021635983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962322,0.0031662062,0.00019500255,0.00008681637,0.000036732956,0.000013357495,0.00015708304,0.0000028738295,0.00010967983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467814,0.0030861506,0.0006376879,0.0005203118,0.0009271979,0.00015041334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8692453,0.10035789,0.021404235,0.0026678557,0.005137539,0.0011872665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011709348,0.00028315192,0.00059343124,0.0024746563,0.00037721262,0.0011097351,0.00045524514,0.0005390068,0.0038324813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046538353,0.00022916931,0.0018717225,0.0030041102,0.00070028583,0.0010449771,0.00073983095,0.00082003523,0.00012411347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021255747,0.000043895514,0.9804607,0.00096289563,0.0040046875,0.00005923621,0.00088062213,0.000121792764,0.00010522166,0.00034731068,0.00023092619,0.012570155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022771495,0.00016961027,0.9925356,0.0008662751,0.003128565,0.00009984033,0.00090322696,0.0003536187,0.00017822838,0.0005965234,0.0011304338,0.000015344207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045696935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063667004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011709348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044296207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006954263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06192571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408877341","doi":"10.1111/pops.70149","title":"Similar Moral Values, Different Agendas? U.S. Politicians’ Use of Moral Language Is Issue-Specific","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Political science; Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.14016769107271904,"score_gpt":0.424401112872652,"score_spread":0.28423342179993294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408877341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727808,0.0005217371,0.0039981916,0.0040876986,0.00007360209,0.0000211879,0.00031915418,0.00004624135,0.01815131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988978,0.00009289587,0.00035720933,0.00016897141,0.000026175783,0.000005344753,0.00009382862,0.000015498217,0.0003422879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663013,0.0023607188,0.00010715226,0.00032043096,0.00036744494,0.0002140834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97759694,0.016047867,0.0037182753,0.0008576949,0.001010758,0.000768402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062840604,0.00017810497,0.00035486557,0.0014946274,0.00096302055,0.0035060497,0.00018634406,0.0007644249,0.0039569666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029758818,0.00024528714,0.00029475446,0.0019747373,0.0021329974,0.0033070857,0.0016671728,0.0015846156,0.0006231605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014978463,0.00050399627,0.6324449,0.00070549373,0.00034333492,0.00033779626,0.122460015,0.0029230402,0.010059394,0.060285836,0.013009229,0.155429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020755097,0.00040513376,0.6966417,0.00069778156,0.0003464067,0.00033462368,0.10965287,0.03718099,0.005284256,0.096730456,0.052343976,0.00017420948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029228134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00402667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062840604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007833369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059360487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033233702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410039656","doi":"10.1111/pops.70035","title":"Collective candidacies and mandates in Brazil: Recasting democratic mediation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; York University","keywords":"Mediation; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.031986265004265726,"score_gpt":0.4306902705654104,"score_spread":0.3987040055611447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410039656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6723779,0.0043899873,0.008755637,0.016879369,0.00012670267,0.00023415966,0.00011417456,0.000059716625,0.2970623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975925,0.0002798444,0.0007533095,0.0001916328,0.000006640212,0.000036215537,0.000008705831,0.00000442056,0.001126641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993693,0.0038899863,0.00022050622,0.0006296908,0.00089819555,0.00066880696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98289454,0.012044454,0.001512582,0.0018297845,0.0013088334,0.00040989666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01329402,0.00026363163,0.00046716948,0.0014426551,0.0054475153,0.004351089,0.0009961264,0.0011547519,0.0030921076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02663253,0.0003204183,0.00038596627,0.0019923968,0.011399999,0.0034976152,0.005516872,0.0021609457,0.00012970428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007070193,0.000099984994,0.019236173,0.0005344566,0.000041754858,0.000930747,0.2049619,0.0007234446,0.002434382,0.712115,0.0020124242,0.056839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016053459,0.00034520525,0.07287212,0.002312709,0.0002880279,0.0007976518,0.27920094,0.0058793006,0.00499812,0.27443996,0.3585631,0.00014237681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03963021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08792318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03963021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008709272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009362756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07879907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410260712","doi":"10.1111/pops.70032","title":"Bridging the divide: Understanding the psychological factors influencing feminist women's support to transgender related policies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Universidad de Granada","keywords":"Transgender; Bridging (networking); Transgender women; Psychology; Gender studies; Transgender Person; Transgender people; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.12267537663333826,"score_gpt":0.45241694091038115,"score_spread":0.3297415642770429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410260712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943327,0.00017000879,0.00009909047,0.0013076089,0.000007361268,0.0000039082724,0.000007232532,8.1949037e-7,0.0040712594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995184,0.0000679083,0.00002271864,0.000094992894,0.0000046561345,0.000003404809,0.0000040795717,6.118217e-7,0.00028322585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00061169884,0.000024677453,0.000105852916,0.00015062622,0.0003075246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956839,0.0021827759,0.0012130778,0.00009987574,0.00022411495,0.00059633557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020674684,0.00016045429,0.00017410236,0.0009282526,0.0018055865,0.003055547,0.00037831315,0.00085062487,0.0059081274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007163121,0.0001484221,0.00014820967,0.0005341455,0.0031764205,0.0015221186,0.0019574426,0.0011294428,0.00019118031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023790609,0.00081690546,0.56683886,0.000098158445,0.000064368294,0.00047099142,0.37429795,0.00013835065,0.0017583851,0.013302891,0.0010127539,0.040962495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001511959,0.00008872288,0.32137424,0.00012355318,0.000018007759,0.00009069834,0.66905487,0.00032067375,0.00025390182,0.0038537679,0.004792393,0.000014049047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007136769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009746932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007136769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013987175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016402886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019764662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410826352","doi":"10.1111/pops.70045","title":"Compensating personal climate response inefficacy with political conservatism?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Conservatism; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4262643195185073,"score_gpt":0.5498407864015332,"score_spread":0.12357646688302593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410826352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99674404,0.000058612815,0.0011159054,0.00024587114,0.0000057035127,0.00000639611,0.000015507301,0.000008740362,0.0017991781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981433,0.00000857161,0.00009982192,0.000019353485,0.0000032582197,0.0000016071133,0.0000060197563,0.0000010325613,0.000046175304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876875,0.0005753889,0.0000822281,0.0001888785,0.00021582269,0.00016878323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806583,0.007711448,0.007497514,0.0025029113,0.00064727943,0.0009825458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528593,0.00020414707,0.00022046485,0.0005663845,0.00046767274,0.001106438,0.00030075712,0.00059926335,0.0033744692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017466018,0.0002259709,0.0002864578,0.00042534637,0.0012878875,0.0008805169,0.0009578673,0.0008097343,0.00009614641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002199804,0.00031457562,0.96732014,0.00006579949,0.00018737846,0.00016770168,0.0046608704,0.0012210375,0.0038261241,0.0023390446,0.00022667996,0.019450683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009074843,0.00007974504,0.99402606,0.00001647224,0.000027847573,0.0001453535,0.001799624,0.0011824664,0.00044626027,0.0019087617,0.00034450548,0.000013772906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00110586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017374859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033744692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040584296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040627824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01337266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411043379","doi":"10.1111/pops.70043","title":"What personality traits do citizens want politicians to have? Observational and experimental evidence of citizens' preferences in three countries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Research Council; Universiteit Antwerpen","keywords":"Observational study; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.15534994009002806,"score_gpt":0.4531347303750362,"score_spread":0.29778479028500815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411043379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996007,0.000007228097,0.00002324408,0.000009038862,0.0000010926644,0.0000032261958,0.000022876162,4.4328118e-7,0.00033225204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998437,0.000008671374,0.000032211676,0.000011531226,0.0000012025374,0.0000040967398,0.00003158304,4.4366894e-7,0.000066449385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981511,0.001296535,0.000096386604,0.00015697876,0.00016188677,0.00013695745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831645,0.008012752,0.0052294605,0.0015920048,0.00069153175,0.0013098441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027478063,0.00013654187,0.00026485126,0.00045374353,0.00061573234,0.0009964268,0.0001647486,0.000493442,0.0021116964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009656636,0.00020998078,0.0002177912,0.0005259883,0.00077376456,0.00028223393,0.00039923136,0.0005491352,0.0003012148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012404342,0.0010887688,0.98602,0.00002555065,0.00010548539,0.00008830132,0.0038528768,0.00016684651,0.0017616395,0.00026919608,0.00029053955,0.00509023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036110654,0.00029638095,0.996687,0.0000051135803,0.000014669759,0.00004061052,0.0020552953,0.00021691904,0.00026765573,0.00011036842,0.00026083988,0.000009207017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035538801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055870446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035538801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026483837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016330564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01453197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413082081","doi":"10.1111/pops.70061","title":"Collective post‐traumatic growth: Validating and measuring positive change in the collective self among victims of sexual violence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Posttraumatic growth; Psychology; Social psychology; Construct (python library); Solidarity; Confirmatory factor analysis; Collective behavior; Politics; Developmental psychology; Structural equation modeling; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.07346431616984081,"score_gpt":0.37844967198825286,"score_spread":0.304985355818412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413082081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978702,0.00003210863,0.0004677438,0.000037886937,0.000008763992,0.00007070818,0.000031327945,0.000005754263,0.0014754956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998543,0.000044675235,0.00089588435,0.000018351297,0.000007885842,0.00015748915,0.000052975443,0.0000028266381,0.0002769757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984043,0.00085721683,0.000121295,0.00010998964,0.000372323,0.00013491194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078465,0.0032578672,0.0031002138,0.0009945839,0.001107568,0.0007552065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042783874,0.00030332804,0.0002630416,0.0011583589,0.0012966885,0.0010279489,0.0005054129,0.0005181607,0.0014653933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128368605,0.00019175958,0.00033559816,0.0005221153,0.0015299487,0.0007087789,0.0020197518,0.0009263672,0.0001993722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004066324,0.0011656026,0.8832851,0.00023025752,0.00013701436,0.00018571434,0.046062037,0.00048789493,0.007157491,0.00095452834,0.0006170791,0.059310734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009644405,0.00075438124,0.96278334,0.000050090395,0.00002848045,0.0002227702,0.031948302,0.0006358946,0.0019662282,0.0006091267,0.00096543203,0.000026268866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059442327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010506085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042783874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042473557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044548695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022626579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417431309","doi":"10.1111/pops.70100","title":"How leading climate movement advocates perceive collective gridlock in social change advocacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Psychology","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Gridlock; Collective action; Climate change; Social movement; Hostility; Political economy of climate change","score_opus":0.44742594904091565,"score_gpt":0.530623472938799,"score_spread":0.08319752389788332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417431309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820311,0.00021542577,0.0005255829,0.003610382,0.000092681665,0.000018835852,0.000007224966,0.000010228401,0.0134884855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908626,0.00006991967,0.00008805467,0.00030225192,0.000017446526,0.0000128506135,0.0000058398095,0.00000433093,0.00041320408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919023,0.0057581253,0.00013662204,0.00030693735,0.0009567569,0.00093935366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98465145,0.008749972,0.0030782768,0.00032965225,0.0011828876,0.0020077846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010363804,0.00037762494,0.0003553461,0.001925201,0.0068688537,0.007709099,0.0007026447,0.002674925,0.0037506053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019081118,0.00032940728,0.0003272556,0.0007414854,0.0068501364,0.0034998215,0.006005841,0.003967211,0.00035313616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103649916,0.00022191479,0.07118765,0.00009378683,0.000026142128,0.00040321195,0.9065529,0.00008990673,0.0013229186,0.0071881087,0.0018138639,0.01099594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028764001,0.00015831053,0.029649235,0.00014945248,0.000018313474,0.00019854849,0.9519124,0.00058913423,0.00025707466,0.0032613615,0.013743061,0.000034358567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030117277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042357245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010363804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021676372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019010748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05480969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}