{"meta":{"query_hash":"ef2b842f8668","filters":{"venue":"Political Research Quarterly"},"cohort_total":61,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":61,"exported":61,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ef2b842f8668","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Research+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1966298473","doi":"10.1177/1065912911427449","title":"Separate but Not Equal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Politics; Electoral politics; Political science; Electoral reform; Ceiling (cloud); Electoral system; Natural experiment; Test (biology); Glass ceiling; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Demographic economics; Law; Economics; Statistics; Democracy; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.38027246864310027,"score_gpt":0.5012837606199578,"score_spread":0.12101129197685756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966298473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08449647,0.001637677,0.008778377,0.02970457,0.0007842676,0.000082895815,0.00033745987,0.00011635316,0.874062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83971137,0.00070940895,0.0021801868,0.00716462,0.00034975808,0.00015453139,0.00027027374,0.00013276249,0.1493271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224585,0.0022088662,0.00018439625,0.0014282935,0.0018675295,0.0020651133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996788,0.0005641091,0.0003586727,0.0009335098,0.0006156151,0.0007401175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033779074,0.0003010015,0.0005808353,0.0010211461,0.0054533104,0.006477241,0.00091641146,0.0012316902,0.031538337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009525877,0.0003360427,0.00045740925,0.001250141,0.015873427,0.0061018346,0.009567091,0.0036841913,0.0033880458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057405116,0.000029052871,0.0020107955,0.000051410178,0.000021134058,0.000070421396,0.007997411,0.00006211503,0.0003825165,0.94877756,0.014822599,0.025717512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006020015,0.00006440303,0.011450525,0.0002466702,0.000042642605,0.00018954626,0.011859875,0.0002556678,0.0008803963,0.32794487,0.6469551,0.00005015842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010037868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014683117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031538337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004742894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004450289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10550624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969774453","doi":"10.1177/1065912909358583","title":"Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Test (biology); Political science; General election; Approval voting; Social psychology; Psychology; Cardinal voting systems; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.24790196064404632,"score_gpt":0.5080655312814356,"score_spread":0.26016357063738926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969774453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995641,0.000023548617,0.0015415971,0.00007475554,0.000011623884,0.00008260389,0.00003723416,0.000005955602,0.002581778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980205,0.00001743483,0.0008992815,0.00003340314,0.000007519897,0.00006907601,0.00009146278,0.000003108016,0.0008583096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853618,0.0114445975,0.0003676026,0.00087620196,0.0008531104,0.0010967168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8931796,0.08955709,0.008752641,0.0050607105,0.0013916092,0.002058369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017810637,0.00071339344,0.0016692859,0.0006052433,0.00089205743,0.0025547189,0.0013867103,0.0018966086,0.007443326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057760917,0.0006339813,0.00124037,0.0006639571,0.0018345524,0.002053001,0.0014557712,0.001993479,0.000999535],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058272503,0.021065373,0.4129212,0.001308426,0.0022991388,0.0012566689,0.015730908,0.25058833,0.020788146,0.12284218,0.0034943658,0.0894328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005803103,0.019812843,0.3231762,0.00009517872,0.0005540446,0.00044176125,0.0063182386,0.53289,0.00658835,0.098297924,0.0055414587,0.00048086455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002794685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027318422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017810637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015420134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007747455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0941928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970262444","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500201","title":"The Ghent System and Union Membership in Europe, 1970-1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Receipt; Economics; Labour economics; Income protection insurance; Demographic economics; Control (management); Trade union; Insurance policy; General insurance; Economic growth; Actuarial science; Geography","score_opus":0.10489102387961154,"score_gpt":0.3922902800749383,"score_spread":0.2873992561953268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970262444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97175455,0.0022719891,0.00014737691,0.0018907081,0.00010281504,0.00002385487,0.0017018467,0.000020613743,0.0220862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818063,0.0014523797,0.000113209055,0.00017841088,0.00012731252,0.000031779815,0.0026639802,0.000014475302,0.013612133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987282,0.00023889565,0.00009031054,0.000119876284,0.00025103422,0.0005715232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771714,0.0003065606,0.00094932644,0.00007549608,0.00032239826,0.00062897295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017142743,0.00019439471,0.000300916,0.0022141351,0.0020090423,0.0028923715,0.00072797405,0.0008911403,0.0066799745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043600197,0.00015872474,0.00020916211,0.004685139,0.0010797755,0.0014913311,0.002506307,0.0010231555,0.0011443147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011122035,0.00048493582,0.85890645,0.00016114234,0.00012504237,0.00061189017,0.01270476,0.0016767174,0.00025778875,0.020230826,0.020007262,0.083721116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004058252,0.00009627539,0.9501812,0.00007784531,0.000019873938,0.00014658505,0.0035180715,0.00019306094,0.00014798601,0.0006181781,0.04494962,0.000010725265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07433944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10471866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07433944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029684037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012741709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1478135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970494169","doi":"10.1177/106591290005300407","title":"Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Situational ethics; Political science; Voting; Affect (linguistics); Identity (music); Gender identity; Politics; General election; Test (biology); Ideology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3546987589204944,"score_gpt":0.47978436384212925,"score_spread":0.12508560492163484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970494169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786397,0.0002810329,0.001294612,0.00046401794,0.000013224807,0.00001609725,0.00005182068,0.000007903771,0.01923169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880636,0.000030779345,0.00011182738,0.000014340398,0.0000048781294,0.0000037251023,0.000010932992,0.0000017060813,0.00101543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982254,0.0010811968,0.00004103054,0.0001276613,0.00020193454,0.00032279268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616516,0.0019999077,0.00071764726,0.00018842188,0.00023607675,0.00069282507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024675922,0.00010379531,0.00027348014,0.00081547943,0.0015025273,0.0023380672,0.00023226501,0.0003908415,0.008800512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006029532,0.00013093076,0.00020156534,0.0007965174,0.0016724349,0.00101191,0.001108633,0.00031392125,0.0005872986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00108769,0.0006421431,0.73202604,0.00012496673,0.000119414784,0.0005346265,0.020088648,0.0049859546,0.0025300262,0.14938435,0.002781103,0.08569504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015450607,0.0004361588,0.8191581,0.00007151373,0.000035077257,0.0002440535,0.023163298,0.011666417,0.0009790334,0.12452355,0.019519603,0.000048781945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037798514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059448583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008800512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012310065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051142677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029440641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984778247","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304109","title":"Presidents, Political Context, and Economic Accountability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Institutionalisation; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Voting; Political economy; Voting behavior; Survey data collection; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07627312439421254,"score_gpt":0.47733380456356705,"score_spread":0.40106068016935453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984778247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976473,0.00026297942,0.00060877023,0.00052387913,0.000016606677,0.00001590578,0.00026032768,0.000008826345,0.021829715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955994,0.000048047477,0.000072870236,0.000013242311,0.0000103236125,0.000004368,0.000060420592,0.0000019079032,0.00022872776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807966,0.0009535706,0.00013468029,0.00021898118,0.0002467584,0.00036628373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817109,0.006875871,0.008658714,0.000818095,0.0011199738,0.0008163889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024904015,0.000110183995,0.00040428588,0.0012417407,0.0009872839,0.0015303289,0.00023098038,0.00020843823,0.004221377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023267344,0.0001300736,0.000087659006,0.0019568633,0.00085038453,0.00081705407,0.00091630145,0.0005164145,0.00021785162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078855155,0.000073817195,0.9742664,0.000045562192,0.00003710491,0.00010790893,0.0026916584,0.00065214775,0.00024092564,0.007807535,0.00058932597,0.013408713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010131756,0.000040464656,0.9905806,0.000030254792,0.000014794349,0.00006259314,0.002187504,0.00058302516,0.00009681164,0.0023693962,0.0040163933,0.000007961773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009899236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030558698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009899236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009310964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000586552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019683242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991634631","doi":"10.1177/1065912909357177","title":"Contradictory Calculi","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Microeconomics; Voter turnout; Bullet voting; Function (biology); Economics; Public economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Cardinal voting systems; Political science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Law","score_opus":0.14153476593502443,"score_gpt":0.49767329931143645,"score_spread":0.356138533376412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991634631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020449055,0.003034294,0.6445465,0.0082928855,0.0011102214,0.00032985403,0.0017918124,0.0017869737,0.31865844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48429477,0.004029052,0.40794417,0.0034542063,0.0015622054,0.0008983979,0.00277003,0.0015351808,0.09351208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946536,0.0012304353,0.00053078163,0.0011697185,0.0018887207,0.00052678015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910685,0.004853214,0.0004993954,0.0018949681,0.001470485,0.00021352981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041068937,0.001359821,0.0016165968,0.0038396392,0.005544638,0.00867645,0.003730563,0.003334396,0.026904687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02068641,0.0014888835,0.0039385073,0.004631459,0.0075619705,0.01825912,0.006696108,0.0050851246,0.0055188625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005252359,0.0000045529914,0.00007089069,0.000035382953,0.0000060339485,0.000034353514,0.000112103284,0.0003992162,0.000038485483,0.99508876,0.0011649324,0.00304006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008356028,0.0000019273118,0.000020839221,0.000021676908,0.000009334206,0.00006151974,0.000034841163,0.0035033433,0.0001237264,0.98242605,0.013780095,0.000008272409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003329424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037961071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026904687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043915967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026354126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0900051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992108282","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500303","title":"Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Nomination; Politics; Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.21372108820387303,"score_gpt":0.4678759746180191,"score_spread":0.2541548864141461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992108282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89297545,0.00053812074,0.00053043215,0.003986467,0.000052314386,0.00014754187,0.0007930116,0.000023395864,0.100953355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034226,0.00020291819,0.00025598382,0.00029143522,0.000019171068,0.000050391685,0.0002459531,0.000007416863,0.008584418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98984104,0.0017159125,0.00025750705,0.0006644387,0.0026257206,0.004895467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98458016,0.004626893,0.0033885536,0.0005809526,0.0024480452,0.0043755146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004895428,0.00020737886,0.00039193546,0.0031793476,0.010477932,0.004662918,0.0010431827,0.002029257,0.014282471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029719146,0.00035923012,0.00030218935,0.0039108726,0.0019492268,0.0010155211,0.0039954516,0.0015315323,0.0005841703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057892356,0.00031688577,0.71954936,0.00021640222,0.00008094323,0.0007538791,0.03914362,0.001690454,0.0012682813,0.13077262,0.022887748,0.082740806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068007896,0.00003789103,0.89972377,0.00011004757,0.00003156752,0.00012031792,0.029391414,0.0013223453,0.00022401752,0.0048113293,0.06410459,0.000054612745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87834686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95640105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12165314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026007168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029869229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24473912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993559288","doi":"10.1177/1065912910379227","title":"Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":636,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Mainstreaming; Gender mainstreaming; Sociology; Power (physics); Frame (networking); Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Gender equality; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.16879161333293644,"score_gpt":0.5278332544710013,"score_spread":0.3590416411380648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993559288","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0716444,0.015110359,0.33790228,0.29185766,0.0040588155,0.00040328657,0.000068134876,0.00036143066,0.2785937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92126846,0.0026607555,0.05304134,0.012602829,0.002101308,0.00095565023,0.000043759297,0.00036668646,0.0069593065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80757636,0.134758,0.008762751,0.010379769,0.032434676,0.0060884045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77189654,0.17545912,0.0065870527,0.016679157,0.025125114,0.0042530308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16776119,0.0014077914,0.0027898306,0.008537369,0.024570156,0.034395665,0.006419268,0.010203572,0.0037843788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13266158,0.0010656894,0.0022087365,0.005235304,0.17932154,0.05583119,0.040097937,0.023740938,0.0007447663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128146485,0.000009046497,0.00020091188,0.000055244967,0.0000067041033,0.00003461764,0.027741726,0.00006672546,0.00007559204,0.9666445,0.00043315033,0.0047189426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014994095,0.00003143816,0.00016670563,0.00034605933,0.000012733918,0.000089680005,0.021728316,0.0002520603,0.0002737172,0.9363156,0.040743314,0.000025344862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006289321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040506446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16776119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016457876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017411588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88721657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995079105","doi":"10.1177/1065912907305221","title":"How Sophisticated Can a Voter Be to Make Causal Attributions? A Response to Gomez and Wilson's Comment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Voting; Attribution; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.17415545386718956,"score_gpt":0.4772837426975364,"score_spread":0.3031282888303468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995079105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015220023,0.00044187636,0.00013747286,0.99459606,0.0043004933,0.0000025836334,0.000026449821,0.000011872559,0.00033098258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076301093,0.00071451004,0.00046979327,0.9779785,0.012071131,0.000030653653,0.000028675207,0.00003373002,0.0010428188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719701,0.012408155,0.0023595411,0.0044930214,0.0072698942,0.0014993579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7209608,0.21981084,0.008261591,0.0064919605,0.037428338,0.0070464597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039959718,0.0012767798,0.0021304716,0.0019954855,0.008815408,0.008408337,0.007203978,0.066938356,0.007884218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2397431,0.0014211615,0.0022676822,0.0037303837,0.01689347,0.01317288,0.0060350555,0.07119217,0.0045055537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005097991,0.000014190348,0.00042983366,0.00008921564,0.00002490859,0.00016521335,0.0012077773,0.000105565865,0.00008400535,0.015043903,0.97856015,0.004224129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024398776,0.00007562267,0.003443054,0.0011195524,0.000115014926,0.0008617889,0.007831072,0.0009906184,0.00079507567,0.10874817,0.87543,0.00034614492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028849924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028619047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066938356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008861767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011829503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2113297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012536499","doi":"10.1177/1065912910376385","title":"Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":337,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Public policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.33685300385527284,"score_gpt":0.5182908525237124,"score_spread":0.1814378486684396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012536499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027641842,0.036851548,0.17021993,0.30733287,0.0010051616,0.00014364856,0.00016200486,0.00020686636,0.45643616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344424,0.021853844,0.026731156,0.0060938345,0.0013707513,0.00049209746,0.00010543957,0.00014525025,0.0087652765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98296595,0.012096037,0.0005136126,0.0011350979,0.0017834102,0.001505875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799872,0.015419639,0.0009022774,0.0018369765,0.0009989082,0.00085506844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020645285,0.0010058964,0.0019035111,0.0062451586,0.009623227,0.0224068,0.005552223,0.0075673973,0.009795311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017905962,0.00073135627,0.002181567,0.008495355,0.081749655,0.038695466,0.015631031,0.008396033,0.0009891362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025729978,0.0000047132985,0.000066060646,0.000015240853,0.0000016840258,0.000008049691,0.0006485531,0.00016502118,0.0000018294141,0.9977412,0.00024455605,0.0011005028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004189322,0.000003280854,0.000066990746,0.000086940185,0.0000032986077,0.000015039298,0.0011886664,0.0005676189,0.000011511823,0.9888015,0.009247069,0.0000039154606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009214558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065632514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0224068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017677968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009214092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12826324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020852836","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500110","title":"Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conservatism; Charter; Political science; Voting; Law; Context (archaeology); Roberts Court; Principal (computer security); Politics","score_opus":0.12749155805501733,"score_gpt":0.40548025179090824,"score_spread":0.2779886937358909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020852836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862111,0.0004928756,0.0001105311,0.0020703683,0.000019234205,0.00004520571,0.0008069895,0.00000803213,0.010235557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955813,0.00027952617,0.00012773875,0.00020490806,0.000008115361,0.000009341775,0.00040986185,0.0000040042137,0.0033752518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997623,0.00014936882,0.000063788815,0.00016446607,0.0012183905,0.0007810313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325126,0.00064443925,0.0010575705,0.00011235287,0.0035523432,0.001381908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022203836,0.00020733634,0.00031009802,0.0019458261,0.008144785,0.002639115,0.00096602086,0.00067766453,0.003082839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00819517,0.00024231694,0.00031537947,0.0035190852,0.0020828003,0.0006435089,0.00084997143,0.0017313535,0.00026119305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000185995,0.00021991525,0.9130927,0.00006547577,0.000068523324,0.00022565748,0.030700706,0.000766242,0.0007183087,0.0055070203,0.011352079,0.037097476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005935344,0.000022802284,0.9812555,0.00002508218,0.000011733066,0.000027134478,0.010290708,0.00035399065,0.00014533038,0.00012565656,0.0077085677,0.00002767805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11180365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11180365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077053435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8111961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021049489","doi":"10.1177/1065912912461307","title":"Congressional Politics of U.S. Immigration Reforms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Immigration; Politics; Political science; Negotiation; Immigration policy; Political economy; Public opinion; Immigration reform; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07748015581296601,"score_gpt":0.4512185268682029,"score_spread":0.3737383710552369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021049489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5037786,0.0018200732,0.0020660127,0.026925337,0.00020665674,0.000040226936,0.000122186,0.000027476739,0.46501344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497706,0.00027228834,0.00028431724,0.0010446567,0.000056091416,0.000035511788,0.000024655557,0.000008899122,0.003296391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064434,0.0052691875,0.00031315576,0.00079657295,0.0012689282,0.0017077966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930621,0.0033131547,0.001657384,0.00043373898,0.0008104158,0.00072325167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012289505,0.00016945745,0.00039435658,0.0016392549,0.00712008,0.010012379,0.00049424364,0.0022886686,0.0057747797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015069994,0.00031143424,0.0005146416,0.0021701378,0.0069260034,0.002377178,0.0034480386,0.0031605721,0.000493362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008344649,0.00008239671,0.008369404,0.000047819947,0.00003783234,0.00009473743,0.008893149,0.001357908,0.00087094243,0.9611965,0.0036694196,0.015296455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021749768,0.00035929756,0.23926353,0.00063426315,0.00020430604,0.0001380412,0.059030436,0.0058901142,0.0039359224,0.4604976,0.22966242,0.00016663305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005267222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01353031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012289505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007280594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042391387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06499392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031101128","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304501","title":"Retrospective Economic Accountability under Authoritarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Authoritarianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); China; Mainland China; Political science; Panel data; Revenue; Nationality; Public administration; Local government; Development economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Accounting; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.06804154293687427,"score_gpt":0.4524899138525372,"score_spread":0.3844483709156629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031101128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985143,0.00014972377,0.00048632442,0.00083023234,0.000024593151,0.000014640495,0.00086095027,0.000011653278,0.012478928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846387,0.000046983747,0.000035364377,0.000024118526,0.00003308337,0.00000562981,0.00031965986,0.0000014539936,0.0010697853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774086,0.0008213623,0.00018128919,0.00029808062,0.00036731389,0.00059111445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642656,0.008734089,0.017755443,0.0029422124,0.0042867744,0.002015922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056312955,0.00012068117,0.00041163317,0.0013724994,0.0006568678,0.0018135745,0.00032009312,0.00037836726,0.0050565978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03368112,0.0001276127,0.00019048322,0.0018715515,0.0010881698,0.0011665284,0.001826348,0.00065206626,0.00037508676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040370217,0.00008420976,0.9590223,0.000023186389,0.000037781225,0.00018343597,0.0013253817,0.0020531162,0.00011200454,0.014604986,0.0025823019,0.019567676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024005636,0.00012894951,0.9746952,0.000017721086,0.000023555225,0.00010116905,0.0015699659,0.0037466162,0.00023159858,0.013396639,0.006048032,0.000016444355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008584763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006318528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008584763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014448136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082842004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02978152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.056460416537896574,"score_gpt":0.3829438105350005,"score_spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037359044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916788,0.00014452222,0.000047320285,0.00067117,0.0000059708473,0.000007214481,0.000038482347,0.0000013331048,0.0074051176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.00008005688,0.00002406473,0.000069340436,0.0000074562136,0.0000028416077,0.000032964657,0.0000013805164,0.00091744406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.00028868543,0.000051309104,0.00015001534,0.0007474275,0.00083053956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912537,0.0015092348,0.0023790572,0.00013067125,0.0019532754,0.0027740893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015543085,0.00008164481,0.0003274675,0.0026735312,0.005034926,0.0023913386,0.00039556352,0.00048292245,0.0026273858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006983314,0.00019712448,0.00018475902,0.0023507567,0.003375953,0.00051563245,0.0015010886,0.0016465238,0.00019167495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536933,0.00012385333,0.96454793,0.00001827919,0.00005836641,0.00018252894,0.015671685,0.00028729008,0.00038195125,0.0072623664,0.001572867,0.009827453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004494628,0.000011772821,0.99259675,0.000013383246,0.000007537429,0.000023813911,0.0055682966,0.00018575332,0.000055532197,0.00034037794,0.0011856329,0.000006566988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7449914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9225341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25500858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011236076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011183693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51302075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043953143","doi":"10.1177/1065912914524831","title":"Race, Party, and the Consequences of Restricting Early Voting in Florida in the 2012 General Election","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Straight-ticket voting; Group voting ticket; Political science; First-past-the-post voting; Legislature; Instant-runoff voting; Disapproval voting; Split-ticket voting; Spoilt vote; Demographic economics; Race (biology); Cardinal voting systems; Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09682191908473017,"score_gpt":0.4357739978005059,"score_spread":0.3389520787157757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043953143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995622,0.00006653151,0.000045311783,0.0007930408,0.0000120197055,0.000008318838,0.0000881702,0.0000020874888,0.003362516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887615,0.000037743026,0.00003117941,0.00015940344,0.000012822732,0.000010008254,0.000082615996,0.0000014573184,0.0007885623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986773,0.00052354235,0.000038560785,0.000112635425,0.00013518402,0.0005127253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962374,0.0009802371,0.0014369271,0.00017637578,0.0003672143,0.0008018419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019814172,0.00010695353,0.00022907667,0.000540052,0.0016943518,0.0009026385,0.00039001615,0.0006360354,0.0041534007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007638554,0.00011627781,0.0002730107,0.00038830776,0.0005676413,0.00057767646,0.00086249644,0.0008187863,0.00031744372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016405168,0.0011218229,0.94022745,0.00005059044,0.0001421607,0.0003044344,0.0044226167,0.00060897367,0.0026917958,0.0037603623,0.0060676956,0.03896162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016565456,0.0001509189,0.99414474,0.000019471468,0.000027084578,0.00003749621,0.0020915463,0.0002959626,0.00022064475,0.0003789167,0.0026052014,0.000011471634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04999107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14770155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04999107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012183975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078105077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09940016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046587431","doi":"10.1177/1065912913520573","title":"Strategic Voting and Coordination Problems in Proportional Systems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportional representation; Voting; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Electoral system; Straight-ticket voting; Contingent vote; Ranked voting system; Coordination game; Public administration; Political economy; Group voting ticket; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.17723868462090087,"score_gpt":0.45216201145942825,"score_spread":0.2749233268385274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046587431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87858975,0.00014910092,0.1051216,0.0010232981,0.00003989902,0.00016333653,0.00010140462,0.000050064773,0.014761556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072546,0.000038678547,0.0077557173,0.000049822163,0.000020622616,0.00009784054,0.000052769385,0.0000061718047,0.0012528874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147826,0.005669544,0.0003133016,0.0011435493,0.00065937644,0.0007358791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96331626,0.02529329,0.006583479,0.0027277796,0.0008375723,0.0012416107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007228584,0.00045718867,0.0008335595,0.0007903365,0.0015659021,0.0019369047,0.0008657558,0.0011542405,0.0056348825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031853516,0.00028490368,0.00060103193,0.0009004858,0.0028523554,0.002466557,0.0021148792,0.0011141627,0.00030315312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083281106,0.00071768183,0.026246322,0.0002738153,0.00023320505,0.00047389528,0.0030992269,0.15350743,0.009138073,0.7594049,0.001954094,0.04411857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050294073,0.0006914354,0.00898487,0.000028687804,0.00005361131,0.00019519449,0.0012687439,0.41758272,0.0021564972,0.5650843,0.0033989614,0.000052120384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015252096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010605818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007228584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014121487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010432558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03822887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047227654","doi":"10.1177/106591290605900401","title":"Party, Ideology, and Vote Intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French Electoral Panel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Multinomial logistic regression; Political science; Identification (biology); Panel data; Legislature; Single non-transferable vote; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.12562642278652342,"score_gpt":0.42401245136406474,"score_spread":0.2983860285775413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047227654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99375653,0.00028240343,0.00037171252,0.0010057178,0.000011108997,0.00001811357,0.001767014,0.000020912152,0.002766397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918321,0.00016735384,0.0003114374,0.00009982144,0.000029551515,0.00003756987,0.0048585427,0.000011801946,0.0026518824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998395,0.00091015355,0.00004807458,0.0001482972,0.00022942471,0.0002689039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896275,0.0066114417,0.0011529002,0.0005806893,0.0014621608,0.00056534156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046774275,0.0002549267,0.0005192301,0.0018899362,0.0010125638,0.0016473652,0.00049270643,0.0009905371,0.004222415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012268045,0.00016874704,0.00058808306,0.0022971763,0.00034871395,0.0006186444,0.0008663078,0.0007374518,0.00094406755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080165133,0.00029237155,0.9215652,0.000096335774,0.0002899978,0.00034957504,0.0052682445,0.007063971,0.00077454676,0.0031529816,0.012377129,0.04796798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028578264,0.00010284639,0.9824639,0.000021575936,0.00004765314,0.000059176364,0.0022667793,0.006446759,0.00021394124,0.00050679233,0.007804512,0.000037288268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17049366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20422484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17049366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017204392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071557704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33900255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047661309","doi":"10.1177/1065912908314713","title":"The Political Resocialization of Immigrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resocialization; Political socialization; Immigration; Politics; Socialization; Biology and political orientation; Adaptation (eye); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Psychology; American political science; Law","score_opus":0.19842220577751904,"score_gpt":0.489765840549163,"score_spread":0.29134363477164393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047661309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134856,0.000038347887,0.00006135063,0.00036152246,0.0000026907912,0.000003203513,0.0000039136635,7.9808314e-7,0.008179674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962485,0.000023022654,0.000013363558,0.000030657447,0.0000032236994,0.0000018828365,0.0000036499598,2.625576e-7,0.0002990881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922836,0.0004117218,0.000017316603,0.000047195066,0.00006438226,0.0002311123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874145,0.00029564195,0.0005174498,0.000081737206,0.00012210662,0.00024159341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009273744,0.0000917821,0.00010861421,0.00048821024,0.0014153105,0.0013753381,0.00015011869,0.0004560774,0.003046521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038812342,0.000054991808,0.00012217366,0.00036151215,0.0018527701,0.0005946276,0.0012852155,0.0005295678,0.00014236572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027976988,0.00067134365,0.737565,0.00007433581,0.00007401931,0.0009976536,0.08258716,0.0014191589,0.0027136263,0.09273882,0.0016401096,0.07923908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032305743,0.00028527546,0.9032454,0.00006110171,0.000025715986,0.00034120708,0.06568768,0.0020917568,0.0004332727,0.018153701,0.009616239,0.000026278665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003795002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055382946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003795002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077320955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006565258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010191619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048937976","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304502","title":"Economic Voting and Political Sophistication in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Sophistication; Presidential system; Voting behavior; Politics; Political science; Disapproval voting; Economics; Ranked voting system; Political economy; Public economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.14031627673591024,"score_gpt":0.48789803429886447,"score_spread":0.34758175756295423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048937976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973991,0.0000467619,0.000061769235,0.0000977989,0.000001991178,0.000003625487,0.000082856044,0.0000021358187,0.0023040394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999642,0.00002299016,0.000036161873,0.000010539444,0.0000043057103,0.0000018505759,0.000081228,8.261131e-7,0.00020004022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994388,0.00020312585,0.00006481589,0.00005208103,0.000100281744,0.00014077431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922295,0.0027569025,0.003413737,0.00039118106,0.0004940825,0.00071450864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001448456,0.00015800534,0.00030564424,0.0017295774,0.0005308709,0.0011113764,0.00017462157,0.00030595183,0.006722359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00517379,0.00014494432,0.00034999455,0.0017477783,0.00057043176,0.00061793934,0.0010508928,0.0006180077,0.00036960866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007758725,0.000059591723,0.99472976,0.000008932916,0.00003830652,0.000037599013,0.0005579121,0.0001990648,0.00020778658,0.0006101281,0.000118875876,0.0033544556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026957462,0.00002854645,0.99889624,0.0000035344096,0.000007410924,0.000020737014,0.00028114833,0.0002490506,0.00006509817,0.00016114609,0.000281295,0.0000030537603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066516595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012514006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006722359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003584269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014124681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022488534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079411133","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500401","title":"When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democracy; Elite; Craft; Political science; Politics; Ideology; Political economy; Work (physics); Public administration; Control (management); Direct democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.36598341056832023,"score_gpt":0.4934216830183262,"score_spread":0.12743827245000594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079411133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761078,0.00014982813,0.00014371393,0.0033847822,0.00001294957,0.000009083822,0.000044100543,0.0000047180433,0.020143034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992939,0.00003880079,0.000028417466,0.00010941902,0.000009625298,0.000003780672,0.000011493943,0.0000012081737,0.00050326175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839276,0.0005863018,0.000066573404,0.00016742156,0.00018340969,0.0006036048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938632,0.0015496401,0.0024117269,0.0003572913,0.00038833462,0.0014297338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030374408,0.00006043732,0.0002371577,0.0007939984,0.0016699473,0.0029469107,0.00033335664,0.00094989786,0.00614822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009065565,0.00010879032,0.00016131153,0.0009891551,0.0029526944,0.0020493378,0.0012876212,0.0011175026,0.0002298904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026406505,0.0003348812,0.79955536,0.00008387429,0.00005558072,0.00041461023,0.03608796,0.0006437176,0.0015424673,0.10587286,0.0027962283,0.052348346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028990318,0.00010050525,0.9562023,0.000050375147,0.000014945484,0.00006436281,0.023855135,0.00046455074,0.00027419266,0.007605202,0.011321461,0.000017961744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010130536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021571409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010130536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020390044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010825488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020567834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088244397","doi":"10.1177/106591290105400309","title":"Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.09078999668256828,"score_gpt":0.43023590698574615,"score_spread":0.3394459103031779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088244397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892956,0.00011352747,0.000050213275,0.000044536886,0.000004071069,0.0000035935313,0.00007277998,5.73452e-7,0.00078122976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.00016213085,0.0000725076,0.000033302753,0.000004572811,0.000012657017,0.00017787257,0.0000014490066,0.00042468458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990369,0.00039077626,0.000058721937,0.00010305707,0.00022150355,0.00018910281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423176,0.0030086394,0.001077338,0.0003011958,0.00062447204,0.0007565259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031429199,0.00014156476,0.0003697789,0.0012896219,0.0008811472,0.0008447249,0.00024517538,0.0004424622,0.004257812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005319472,0.00026119457,0.00060619786,0.0013138409,0.0006867046,0.000787708,0.0010050514,0.00058631727,0.00032407694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008343942,0.00011882794,0.99275583,0.000014045091,0.00012438983,0.000067846246,0.0030295157,0.00003641501,0.00011509052,0.0001444623,0.00015080826,0.0033593203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030168023,0.0000894925,0.9944349,0.000016191721,0.000041949294,0.00008696988,0.004571131,0.00008182883,0.00003979114,0.00006240265,0.00056825206,0.000004040209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009452759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017686035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009452759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047176445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005738947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01879549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089831780","doi":"10.1177/1065912911411099","title":"Politics in Peer Groups","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reciprocal; Social capital; Bridging (networking); Diversity (politics); Political science; Interpersonal ties; Panel survey; Political economy; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.22393472110129745,"score_gpt":0.45298264830814694,"score_spread":0.2290479272068495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089831780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33160147,0.002396496,0.010706337,0.0085865585,0.0003310735,0.000096716954,0.00011685711,0.000074205185,0.64609027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803683,0.0004473982,0.0005827409,0.00020175368,0.00010811461,0.00003228394,0.000025141944,0.000009404969,0.01822492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969523,0.0019482191,0.000051856325,0.00035490684,0.00032234163,0.00037042215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660385,0.0013833266,0.00063527666,0.00037594917,0.0003222972,0.0006792715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018176197,0.00017705787,0.0002591822,0.0012454968,0.0035549388,0.0041116355,0.0003876287,0.00084624236,0.01688932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006555968,0.00015467,0.00015987411,0.0011309163,0.0034780966,0.0023338464,0.002643275,0.0006767903,0.0017630896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006451925,0.00015662464,0.028266883,0.00014329709,0.000054038486,0.0007103161,0.0752408,0.0009984778,0.0007967847,0.79537195,0.012359717,0.085836574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005228114,0.00015350433,0.049609188,0.00018641334,0.00004611837,0.00060241023,0.04054086,0.0021857696,0.0005015344,0.46793646,0.43815523,0.000030270901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023720711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002000799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01688932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011660669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010647405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056500435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097338549","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500204","title":"Evangelicalism Meets the Continental Divide: Mloral and Economic Conservatism in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Protestantism; Exceptionalism; Politics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Fundamentalism; Anti-Americanism; Sociology; Political economy; Positive economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09077587072037419,"score_gpt":0.40142498267280813,"score_spread":0.31064911195243394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097338549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948214,0.00022955079,0.000020701935,0.0010084927,0.000004462282,0.000005288605,0.00022339207,0.000002172112,0.003684532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986338,0.0002149049,0.000029309473,0.00008394747,0.0000023245068,0.0000018578187,0.00019064538,0.0000025452675,0.00084062794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999071,0.000102919636,0.000022075412,0.00008347986,0.00024919966,0.0004714328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996994,0.00024469986,0.00037618476,0.00007754531,0.0010602307,0.0012472774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084748294,0.00015441651,0.00037868138,0.00189008,0.0064767096,0.0028621056,0.0008956975,0.0004151254,0.0022781985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033441146,0.00015774943,0.00024017319,0.004462733,0.0020839532,0.00066332996,0.0019041952,0.0009951645,0.00011496307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010914349,0.00007612776,0.96589255,0.000019314495,0.00005677149,0.00022187099,0.013125698,0.0003736734,0.0002331314,0.0042086374,0.0028568094,0.01282621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069534485,0.000009671378,0.9673692,0.000027979992,0.000020980482,0.00002979898,0.027208125,0.00054276106,0.00009293696,0.00027022083,0.004404094,0.000017349908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99654275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0397784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0397784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049063288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2886138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104194603","doi":"10.1177/1065912913510609","title":"Emerging Powers in the Climate Negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Political science; Political economy; Emerging markets; Identity (music); Development economics; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07136422016343524,"score_gpt":0.4553042924580914,"score_spread":0.38394007229465615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104194603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19152138,0.0033331022,0.012515057,0.022211997,0.00037589954,0.00005823693,0.000031069794,0.000013613432,0.76993966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902228,0.000744077,0.0006882067,0.00073545036,0.00005834602,0.000027683436,0.000008765589,0.0000080218315,0.0075067217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262166,0.0044076536,0.00017934295,0.00044806968,0.0009657049,0.001377554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555796,0.0021669264,0.000509457,0.00024834968,0.00048059731,0.001036591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674468,0.00028424358,0.0002949757,0.0010704278,0.011276377,0.010025561,0.00084091944,0.0022142911,0.00516854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009949731,0.00021429174,0.00041287858,0.0014817379,0.015346631,0.008928186,0.008753005,0.0058324384,0.00046655242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067535875,0.000008560407,0.0005085229,0.000008761388,0.000002057827,0.00013079299,0.0070993383,0.00017759723,0.000048443413,0.98967093,0.0003709657,0.0019672439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029879215,0.000028485643,0.0028909694,0.00021472307,0.000014167438,0.0003082429,0.03964199,0.0013123956,0.00034665043,0.8469102,0.10827619,0.00002615099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064825667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009119245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011276377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053151846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059613483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038564563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108005226","doi":"10.1177/1065912908320663","title":"Relative Extremism and Relative Moderation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.2474749647686408,"score_gpt":0.47677753183022614,"score_spread":0.22930256706158533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108005226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92780524,0.0008429722,0.013813257,0.0012164173,0.000048185928,0.000029673667,0.000102638536,0.00004057132,0.056101065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988362,0.000068864196,0.0005161991,0.000030581334,0.00003152036,0.000008400809,0.000021069218,0.0000040370533,0.00048304978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969676,0.0013949025,0.00010225047,0.00058222545,0.00040351044,0.00054955395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98994946,0.004965514,0.0028209584,0.0009807772,0.0005431284,0.000740213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003194426,0.0002504285,0.00044663224,0.0014713417,0.0014013002,0.001658407,0.00037255354,0.0005402891,0.0052351453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012791603,0.00015501532,0.00024181147,0.0011833935,0.0033941532,0.0017247908,0.002809278,0.00094979524,0.00028749174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081601896,0.00016090748,0.25505474,0.00039872335,0.0003649638,0.0004922994,0.017352046,0.0034219753,0.009988653,0.6042837,0.0017413344,0.105924584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013539818,0.0007246955,0.5152425,0.0001660546,0.00020089274,0.00097181293,0.012141332,0.004730494,0.003591109,0.43330392,0.028694557,0.0000972008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036884853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040521455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052351453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005899562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030082048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017513275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128384648","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349631","title":"Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Proposition; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Public administration; Composition (language); Local election; Law","score_opus":0.09907213906656631,"score_gpt":0.47410724886507927,"score_spread":0.37503510979851296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128384648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95519614,0.0002623363,0.0018568089,0.0012834299,0.00006607583,0.00006661122,0.00007366457,0.000014454333,0.041180465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615896,0.00006998946,0.00018078611,0.00015137301,0.000027262386,0.000014059341,0.000029543608,0.0000045373436,0.003363426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518,0.0028204196,0.00018431242,0.00025703784,0.0006642246,0.0008940046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872829,0.007487986,0.00246562,0.00058550684,0.00075983605,0.0014181061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034850435,0.000187551,0.00021258794,0.0010297901,0.0021668184,0.002050485,0.00028154484,0.00047099136,0.009593718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020224126,0.00013501645,0.00016229306,0.0007230579,0.0015820859,0.00056792516,0.001622339,0.00048470745,0.00094565464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006831548,0.0006632831,0.8407498,0.00015241615,0.000070732625,0.0014093388,0.035741456,0.00041886573,0.002889683,0.017194495,0.004783152,0.09524353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008291509,0.00037698078,0.8939682,0.00023537337,0.00006440975,0.0010537552,0.0510585,0.0014429096,0.002073791,0.008606658,0.040979136,0.000057376565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012603088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027924491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012603088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091015577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008657867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03209418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130308920","doi":"10.1177/1065912915580627","title":"Minorities in the Middle East","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Middle East; Democratization; Middle class; Ethnic group; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Psychological resilience; Islam; Secularism; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Democracy; Gender studies; Politics; Social psychology; History; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.4291201391669498,"score_gpt":0.4644150513692397,"score_spread":0.03529491220228992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130308920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940941,0.0003183407,0.000035217396,0.00044722515,0.000012249861,0.0000031342468,0.000025889294,7.048636e-7,0.005063138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992569,0.00016447062,0.000021022684,0.00011996948,0.000008798907,0.000002241327,0.000013573187,3.7178847e-7,0.00041266522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996749,0.00009210077,0.000015573918,0.000040878782,0.000035355915,0.00014113574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995888,0.000060366812,0.00015394021,0.000021967911,0.000049050213,0.00012581355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056764996,0.000113362716,0.0001655825,0.0005646758,0.0018695955,0.0012951615,0.00017789128,0.0002496028,0.0031215423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010364954,0.000056149776,0.00011348472,0.00070941076,0.000886488,0.00074888393,0.0012558039,0.0003893937,0.0002227489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046660856,0.00015359532,0.6952853,0.00018510567,0.000080197664,0.0010595501,0.20244287,0.00021262318,0.0046426095,0.016627727,0.0020574378,0.076786265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019005727,0.000114043934,0.72527266,0.00024917637,0.000049341128,0.0003847515,0.24697405,0.00020532627,0.0008739806,0.0041780476,0.021653645,0.00002607654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015174926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023169728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015174926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081514654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070148683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030173182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168513950","doi":"10.1177/1065912911421014","title":"Governing “Democratic” Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meritocracy; Mill; Governmentality; Democracy; Inequality; Liberalism; Democratic theory; Political science; Sociology; Underclass; Individualism; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.39577324407980097,"score_gpt":0.5075148953185098,"score_spread":0.11174165123870883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168513950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037541363,0.0018485476,0.07403529,0.06595653,0.0015150212,0.0001729363,0.000076935525,0.00016004643,0.81869346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96636605,0.00051552366,0.0053743315,0.007605948,0.00073605735,0.0002121882,0.000041174433,0.00008502925,0.019063722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97874075,0.008353891,0.0007520025,0.004293306,0.004393327,0.0034667465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960984,0.0041942573,0.0013133661,0.0024981434,0.0014618029,0.0009226441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019349301,0.0005125297,0.00059528253,0.0012605806,0.0068516545,0.008522751,0.0011956932,0.0037257117,0.00659539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0240844,0.00038538978,0.0006068635,0.0008283313,0.03494579,0.0073524495,0.011558754,0.007243931,0.0010221379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002362595,0.000006547692,0.00013861299,0.00000843051,0.000003818492,0.000010194557,0.0011674338,0.00010821434,0.00006798864,0.99497694,0.0012770217,0.0022324552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011327436,0.000008979021,0.00031904984,0.000043045242,0.000005725021,0.000020959797,0.00054876745,0.00025912188,0.00031043988,0.93752205,0.060940586,0.00000986303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033080208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032837365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019349301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058925794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074321744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10233015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347107049","doi":"10.1177/1065912916640900","title":"Political Socialization and Voting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Socialization; Turnout; Voting; Educational attainment; European Social Survey; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Voting behavior; Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.2370657947104446,"score_gpt":0.5209200335860047,"score_spread":0.2838542388755601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347107049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732439,0.00013290958,0.00034246288,0.000359237,0.0000076084057,0.000005182409,0.00004717371,0.0000028412649,0.025858685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994574,0.00001934453,0.00001829862,0.000007999062,0.000004179181,8.601648e-7,0.00001134325,5.4427557e-7,0.00048006073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917847,0.00035684145,0.00002566567,0.0000855249,0.00007609326,0.00027739073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978263,0.00073673663,0.0007998295,0.00013801527,0.00010876554,0.00039041275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008732133,0.00008919755,0.00016266025,0.0006820035,0.00073249073,0.0013386721,0.00018048346,0.00028134225,0.007929835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003688978,0.000059226102,0.00012130997,0.0006642519,0.001371127,0.00059035275,0.000903898,0.00037406923,0.00035592963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023817002,0.00021895661,0.84879404,0.000036614394,0.00006956492,0.0003935326,0.0075382325,0.0012261551,0.001128395,0.08985906,0.0014377648,0.049059585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016217997,0.00008360408,0.9608156,0.000025772297,0.000019244148,0.00020092372,0.005736506,0.0016074227,0.00033796424,0.024567991,0.0065760487,0.000012633614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031508398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042305207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007929835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053005817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020460483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026527941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620762129","doi":"10.1177/1065912917709354","title":"When the “Laws of Fear” Do Not Apply: Effective Counterterrorism and the Sense of Security from Terrorism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Purdue University","keywords":"Terrorism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.044795252073460995,"score_gpt":0.4084869752611737,"score_spread":0.3636917231877127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620762129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99041396,0.000096196265,0.00055319973,0.00059013907,0.000013812877,0.000015375703,0.000013306639,0.0000022443178,0.008301848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995772,0.000036821195,0.0001352777,0.00011595186,0.000004001672,0.000008234173,0.000008045109,0.0000011321183,0.00011324802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686396,0.0018784128,0.00017517341,0.00027054083,0.0005079583,0.0003040963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96663463,0.0210698,0.0080776,0.002412531,0.0009578008,0.00084765215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036137428,0.0002458847,0.0002893837,0.00046074312,0.00070558477,0.0024852871,0.00032748564,0.0013996495,0.0023661375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234478,0.00026505964,0.00033648845,0.0002331174,0.003829437,0.0020611098,0.0014436665,0.0019075325,0.00016007424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035830473,0.0062280805,0.65498644,0.0011089394,0.0007975274,0.00095684215,0.14397226,0.0039301896,0.029481724,0.074679725,0.0018413335,0.07843378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023760503,0.0022420592,0.86080635,0.00034865362,0.00044163395,0.0005526432,0.060164724,0.0047944034,0.007961103,0.05585704,0.006429552,0.0001641619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013810786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001313336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036137428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083623215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005946117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019111514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733328125","doi":"10.1177/1065912917717818","title":"Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a Liberal Right of Secession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political philosophy; Frame (networking); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.17369954166981158,"score_gpt":0.4960589075875838,"score_spread":0.32235936591777226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733328125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05573373,0.033805415,0.017171388,0.33845627,0.002453005,0.000041517094,0.000064578315,0.000060772494,0.55221343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112844,0.011311702,0.0039395625,0.024949182,0.0016081441,0.00007080451,0.000030382498,0.00006734079,0.046738617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736375,0.0016129501,0.000052323318,0.00020972424,0.0005649377,0.00019626474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956915,0.0031767623,0.00020641771,0.00026720946,0.00039428115,0.00026389724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033401612,0.00023826305,0.00040382287,0.001000738,0.0051747835,0.0048140273,0.0004223343,0.002932444,0.0030194605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050752484,0.00023356992,0.00021747663,0.0009001069,0.034667157,0.004813004,0.0024134812,0.0053157434,0.00071113784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076127844,0.000007577554,0.00010223504,0.000014721445,0.0000016289677,0.00003062486,0.0036137698,0.00006277302,0.00006213205,0.9869201,0.0065695876,0.002607308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011176891,0.00001178597,0.00029353553,0.00015576238,0.000004144242,0.00006114647,0.0029108725,0.00015170833,0.00020310286,0.87506723,0.12111299,0.00001655389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005307098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005947812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005307098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030793678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032138482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022342503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752243049","doi":"10.1177/1065912917727370","title":"Race and the Meso-Level Sources of Domination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Oppression; Race (biology); Sociology; Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Racism; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24364697679629982,"score_gpt":0.4943446241393689,"score_spread":0.2506976473430691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752243049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3158899,0.003939399,0.047030758,0.020010626,0.00013370084,0.000037801605,0.00007225128,0.00006506949,0.6128205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956222,0.000303743,0.0009013832,0.00019344235,0.000037928698,0.000009838777,0.000006749509,0.000013011459,0.0029116408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971806,0.0014945829,0.0000477415,0.00033072958,0.00047273329,0.0004736087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995626,0.002127591,0.0007273134,0.0006649312,0.00045858137,0.0003955832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043070414,0.00021487195,0.00034316798,0.0018311178,0.004126084,0.006206731,0.00084740185,0.0008513631,0.005447097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055528865,0.00019480255,0.00031670008,0.0013920884,0.017966108,0.005734117,0.0059802257,0.0021051352,0.00028339605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008855022,0.000009150421,0.0029354193,0.000015135807,0.00000680222,0.000056001078,0.0061438116,0.00029050026,0.00019614004,0.98529726,0.0003345934,0.004706331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077919985,0.000017166225,0.011333394,0.000097775264,0.000015115717,0.00011949245,0.008781792,0.0012763999,0.0005014721,0.93330675,0.044526108,0.000016739616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029606605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048266076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006206731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041041854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002484586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029778063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794532306","doi":"10.1177/1065912918761009","title":"Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent Men versus Leftist Women?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Left-wing politics; Ideology; System justification; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Parliament; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Competence (human resources); Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.10640559922372476,"score_gpt":0.4104760657507457,"score_spread":0.3040704665270209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794532306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581134,0.000016396785,0.00014161323,0.00013701952,0.0000065013546,0.0000073294664,0.00002011915,0.0000024602737,0.0038572852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994137,0.0000074285936,0.000050272938,0.000036551643,0.0000033199638,0.0000040295226,0.000013824807,0.0000020693362,0.0004687683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997538,0.0015103704,0.00006917549,0.00020961088,0.00027342196,0.00039944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.00076817995,0.00081465725,0.00021183495,0.00018679576,0.00038804108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018766408,0.000115349605,0.00023497759,0.000605595,0.0012466813,0.0017032744,0.0002305175,0.00035440628,0.0070134127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503149,0.00013109854,0.00011112181,0.0005667701,0.0013157687,0.0007923579,0.0011129318,0.00035797324,0.0009701401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002927665,0.0012249245,0.74085087,0.00018128242,0.000084787775,0.0011288127,0.140227,0.00025543314,0.01818763,0.011889808,0.0035355643,0.079506174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089686764,0.00070240005,0.8477667,0.00006092413,0.000030256688,0.0005263478,0.1362587,0.0009078392,0.0018832557,0.0017005921,0.010037297,0.000035951784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055663735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008815595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070134127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007177445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038098288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023462176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800115565","doi":"10.1177/1065912918768031","title":"Beneficence, Street Begging, and Diverted Giving Schemes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Compromise; Law and economics; Normative; Donation; Political science; Law; Population; Element (criminal law); Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.16696312524705134,"score_gpt":0.5368734931876278,"score_spread":0.3699103679405764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800115565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32433185,0.004234296,0.019419452,0.07724245,0.0008774915,0.00017933949,0.00004140964,0.000057810423,0.5736159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785786,0.0006875392,0.0017364768,0.005860377,0.00019498101,0.0000990276,0.000009849239,0.000012128805,0.012821072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98227537,0.012380932,0.000376625,0.000837247,0.0018244338,0.0023053945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858845,0.0060915262,0.0014952056,0.0012704605,0.00077992055,0.0017744318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014570038,0.00022921215,0.00032711803,0.0011633836,0.0075538657,0.0063616717,0.0012692049,0.005482131,0.004546949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021564618,0.00022935926,0.0003896488,0.0011913055,0.039108224,0.0046201316,0.009317805,0.005608696,0.0003066717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021314147,0.000044751483,0.0014666255,0.000026272037,0.0000031210466,0.00006772491,0.0042819222,0.00014966307,0.000045503664,0.98325723,0.0012408872,0.00939492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001293371,0.00034058111,0.008161037,0.00070413214,0.000030825257,0.00048768971,0.023618346,0.001272356,0.0005436386,0.7953774,0.16925281,0.00008187803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005849775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009937033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014570038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005287901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006356718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07705468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805677146","doi":"10.1177/1065912918775252","title":"Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Accountability; Politics; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Preference; Political economy; Social psychology; Public administration; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05567274590710162,"score_gpt":0.4787482996375129,"score_spread":0.4230755537304113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805677146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.000006117742,0.000075828684,0.00004302061,0.0000041190256,0.000055781595,0.0000064240694,0.0000017219947,0.0006697511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973241,0.00004023984,0.00071805774,0.00016327022,0.000031201584,0.00031147906,0.000033430577,0.0000039331744,0.0013742249],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978769,0.0013729096,0.000091330476,0.000231077,0.00018361726,0.00024413301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893128,0.007031835,0.0017261349,0.000963525,0.000275479,0.00069017976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052935523,0.00044547505,0.0004795104,0.00041621705,0.0019846465,0.0013607921,0.00053582573,0.0010228641,0.0062134084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010764452,0.0005207853,0.0003661807,0.00033233548,0.001644769,0.00093795516,0.00090663135,0.0017153379,0.00057590957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029702632,0.47605446,0.22184487,0.0004687847,0.00036519975,0.00081795285,0.09316884,0.0027921693,0.057329215,0.011381129,0.004004155,0.102070644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021745512,0.2509758,0.58166707,0.00019488632,0.0010091978,0.00057886046,0.063099675,0.020044018,0.023392567,0.020117585,0.016777646,0.00039720203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020462926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035526678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062134084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005928354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006063357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027995288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810349191","doi":"10.1177/1065912918784209","title":"<i>TRENDS:</i> Police Militarization and the Use of Lethal Force","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Suspect; Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Political science; Poison control; Geography; Law; Psychology; Politics; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.2495762502331529,"score_gpt":0.4923058386755124,"score_spread":0.2427295884423595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810349191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98786247,0.0008919257,0.00018424289,0.003225725,0.00004128317,0.000009104271,0.0020972833,0.00001653865,0.0056713284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662894,0.0007134682,0.00013782152,0.00017094357,0.000080614525,0.0000060502307,0.00119036,0.0000047974045,0.0010670242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.00008329869,0.000055548455,0.0000841972,0.00009626403,0.00008100997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890325,0.0011146825,0.008290549,0.00028912924,0.0008729407,0.00040018352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008366143,0.0001112083,0.0000990298,0.0012228796,0.0003611949,0.0011060839,0.00035832357,0.0004073414,0.0041081635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053377035,0.00011223175,0.00020936024,0.0020757122,0.0005812224,0.0010032027,0.00068041234,0.00071466964,0.00050129084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023223809,0.000018917719,0.99305433,0.000031639098,0.000031533003,0.000024439918,0.00081831234,0.00006429286,0.00013728974,0.0005452423,0.0015481957,0.0037025623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017021923,0.000029847708,0.99433196,0.000028479388,0.0000128063175,0.000046192767,0.0028232092,0.0001533073,0.00012236137,0.00013141925,0.0023150765,0.0000035275693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032158915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042868707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032158915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006710735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006589756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063943446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2842535635","doi":"10.1177/1065912918786040","title":"Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Cash; Public relations; Social psychology; Control (management); Political science; Psychology; Personality; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Law; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.13145612914317306,"score_gpt":0.4539914673465095,"score_spread":0.32253533820333646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2842535635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98760825,0.00027693502,0.00018009338,0.0019036263,0.000024214034,0.000009275149,0.000009500165,0.000002528884,0.00998552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853384,0.000105767635,0.000062255254,0.00022131013,0.000010721977,0.0000031411641,0.0000059544045,0.0000012775728,0.0010557259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990914,0.00045875387,0.000017706392,0.000078312994,0.00016313037,0.00019065927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978734,0.00063865015,0.00071320945,0.000118902244,0.00013016247,0.0005256184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018019197,0.00012853487,0.00018625791,0.0003203444,0.0014914193,0.0013733461,0.00021874787,0.00052439515,0.0034177746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007500245,0.00011843712,0.00010094553,0.0003187842,0.0023840896,0.0007700323,0.0006902954,0.0009972911,0.00031649272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011802076,0.00068665046,0.6649139,0.00012537048,0.00009525376,0.0014044467,0.14698288,0.00011760901,0.0064395373,0.02748196,0.0031024434,0.14746974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118011696,0.0004648583,0.74935883,0.00025536868,0.00009261396,0.0011852428,0.21104468,0.00060444087,0.0013810821,0.009055618,0.026374433,0.00006485895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010535452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029348591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010535452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069730333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011851257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020948231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889819521","doi":"10.1177/1065912918796326","title":"The Influence of Cause and Sectional Group Lobbying on Government Responsiveness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Incentive; Interest group; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Set (abstract data type); Politics; Work (physics); Public policy; Special Interest Group; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.07763246343692679,"score_gpt":0.3575061416990297,"score_spread":0.27987367826210297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889819521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671108,0.0002470991,0.00070454914,0.0014688,0.00002313737,0.00005150157,0.00032528522,0.00001583954,0.030052865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982728,0.000040793893,0.00006151118,0.00010709615,0.0000087741855,0.000009999214,0.000079135265,0.0000053369486,0.0014144583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937729,0.0025381874,0.00014044599,0.0006791534,0.0010931683,0.0017760193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97047865,0.015912501,0.006144186,0.0023320287,0.0018730356,0.0032596115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006269629,0.00018211587,0.00042803763,0.0011929196,0.0019524735,0.0026287881,0.0006365472,0.00080896117,0.0059550675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03297395,0.00015258607,0.00037093624,0.0013372615,0.0025045758,0.0008618281,0.0016469369,0.0012248788,0.00053148536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005657328,0.00021460449,0.9427326,0.000057746467,0.00019941741,0.00016125398,0.008255144,0.001879102,0.0012421925,0.012338688,0.0033091914,0.029044311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020442994,0.000100715144,0.98468274,0.000034152385,0.00009554699,0.000028841618,0.0046813944,0.0012680457,0.0004996405,0.0017410534,0.006830239,0.000017231152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36038208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45907658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36038208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006186642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042058886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7165688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889870292","doi":"10.1177/1065912918798489","title":"Receiving Foreign Aid Can Reduce Support for Incumbent Presidents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aid effectiveness; Test (biology); Politics; Accountability; Public economics; Mechanism (biology); Business; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country; Law","score_opus":0.13307506108103664,"score_gpt":0.482618859026625,"score_spread":0.3495437979455883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889870292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99149054,0.00012390947,0.00011162828,0.00048752205,0.000019714142,0.0000054902775,0.000058479243,0.000009889938,0.0076928744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895847,0.000052639894,0.00006043113,0.000057699817,0.000009576915,0.0000038119924,0.000026537879,0.0000018267965,0.0008291257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895763,0.00048480945,0.00003985434,0.00009114906,0.00009961709,0.00032681946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920684,0.0035650465,0.0026083966,0.00048433075,0.00038574185,0.0008879897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011644097,0.00017988283,0.00028315003,0.0004527349,0.00075273996,0.0009971595,0.00024145783,0.00044817588,0.010649315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009346124,0.000100914636,0.0002503774,0.00051833334,0.0007516526,0.00033722405,0.0013535145,0.0005130544,0.00076633185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039996235,0.001862561,0.8280478,0.0005626955,0.00042545513,0.0010072333,0.0087601505,0.0043689036,0.014942089,0.021283189,0.008251121,0.1064892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012155306,0.0011197511,0.9736439,0.000054723136,0.00017141843,0.00015459521,0.007366939,0.0009846778,0.0030091095,0.003267808,0.010085831,0.000019763915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035711979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054972903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010649315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004374295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045895053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035625517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954655822","doi":"10.1177/1065912919847293","title":"Intersectionality, Linked Fate, and LGBTQ Latinx Political Participation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Transgender; Intersectionality; Politics; Feeling; Gender studies; Sociology; Minority group; Identification (biology); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Ethnic group; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.1643047173249085,"score_gpt":0.4968359847713774,"score_spread":0.3325312674464689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954655822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928219,0.00009824104,0.00027560422,0.00037868455,0.0000053027675,0.000007566712,0.000028991182,0.0000021690614,0.0063815196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916327,0.000079139034,0.00010192031,0.000044864766,0.0000059554654,0.000010858724,0.000030982188,0.0000016999853,0.0005612815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989537,0.00063000084,0.00003966433,0.000075809614,0.000112592694,0.0001883181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755883,0.0006862348,0.0009954522,0.00015841676,0.00017654103,0.00042446225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017531218,0.00015258098,0.00022236929,0.0013684623,0.002209772,0.0022260754,0.00028498055,0.00034386423,0.0072628087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042006536,0.00010938105,0.00022312897,0.0010628257,0.002582821,0.0014925047,0.0040229904,0.0007303168,0.0002761484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014221427,0.00014825577,0.89068455,0.00005420574,0.000045444704,0.00019844453,0.07477113,0.00009344053,0.0005400479,0.010173176,0.00037713643,0.022771977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114993445,0.000116537354,0.7568356,0.0001493693,0.000021613667,0.00035879962,0.2287712,0.00032696946,0.0002577799,0.0064297984,0.006701447,0.000019508712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055649667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013389888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072628087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006205196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005954289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024296463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980111277","doi":"10.1177/1065912919879764","title":"Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than Their Male Colleagues?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Dove; Political science; Ideology; House of Representatives; Political economy; Roll call; Dimension (graph theory); Politics; Public administration; Law; Voting; Sociology","score_opus":0.11378162908741503,"score_gpt":0.4303996830704761,"score_spread":0.3166180539830611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980111277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787178,0.0008125279,0.00018319376,0.0026197264,0.00008117731,0.0000034769073,0.00010883785,0.0000031789748,0.017469998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775887,0.0001623323,0.00003253912,0.00022612787,0.000039890954,0.0000033332033,0.000040027462,0.0000031829256,0.0017337513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991611,0.00034917236,0.000018003506,0.00012535656,0.00013051041,0.0002158764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981761,0.00044962898,0.0008161856,0.0000899552,0.00012085672,0.00034722209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013038024,0.00008621258,0.00021226815,0.00067428115,0.000941533,0.0015170188,0.00021751104,0.00046904423,0.0076416093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045174845,0.00009132272,0.00012765531,0.00085209805,0.0011491171,0.0009370222,0.0006258857,0.00045957766,0.00087279995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023307669,0.00009326193,0.9239438,0.000047844183,0.000058977737,0.00014833988,0.018806426,0.000057792728,0.0009043123,0.008576846,0.0038699429,0.043259297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009964879,0.000094031675,0.93945205,0.00009431306,0.000022817578,0.0002583043,0.038035378,0.00010979095,0.00032841056,0.0013882775,0.020194411,0.00001225535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005031253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010190136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076416093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042809724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031295995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025563717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008660424","doi":"10.1177/1065912920906193","title":"Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Presidential system; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2500075570869809,"score_gpt":0.4546764629392381,"score_spread":0.20466890585225717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008660424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961028,0.000028476532,0.00006900709,0.000101684804,0.0000040057157,0.000010543736,0.000008754261,8.1602076e-7,0.003673812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863774,0.000049577357,0.00016120813,0.00012394451,0.000006152213,0.000012113437,0.000028498076,0.000002037407,0.0009787097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965048,0.0023701156,0.000106760985,0.0002944756,0.00054126565,0.00018266733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896164,0.0054336083,0.0027611423,0.0012298796,0.0010580164,0.0005557142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006128913,0.00023219925,0.00042699228,0.00047693987,0.0011079747,0.0011970139,0.00036012213,0.0005865154,0.0032957383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016492328,0.00034817762,0.00025141082,0.0003744865,0.0024537304,0.00093792164,0.0010811136,0.00091256975,0.00047688687],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019410292,0.01002509,0.6855135,0.0005109145,0.00079654035,0.00068839465,0.09294351,0.0011488709,0.06947549,0.014176831,0.0044486346,0.100861914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006442039,0.0037232726,0.9603579,0.00007686005,0.0002416947,0.0002534613,0.012983805,0.0024032495,0.008862714,0.0032879019,0.007090367,0.000074665375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01895718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03600353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01895718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075300573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005293899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03769368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036705317","doi":"10.1177/1065912920930822","title":"The Language of Legacies: The Politics of Evoking Dead Leaders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Courtesy; Charisma; Feeling; Natural experiment; Political science; Public opinion; Voting; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.21361875054650054,"score_gpt":0.48500977684716123,"score_spread":0.2713910263006607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036705317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8503525,0.00065287756,0.006310273,0.014149884,0.00020323512,0.00004444903,0.00009115887,0.000055223307,0.12814038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970469,0.00008421484,0.0008014426,0.0005522963,0.000058293426,0.000015134657,0.000014476228,0.00001979481,0.0014074692],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925136,0.0063456222,0.00009780199,0.00026724156,0.0005144858,0.00026119783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97428167,0.017785432,0.0042187055,0.0016638467,0.001306639,0.0007437891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004910371,0.00024587955,0.00024176146,0.00075439597,0.0026046194,0.004230085,0.00052648585,0.0012965557,0.0071368124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026626296,0.0001761294,0.00014131996,0.0005846407,0.0072632283,0.0037864987,0.0014446478,0.0019358044,0.00085256016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016672075,0.00069286453,0.0724058,0.00089554884,0.00008505218,0.001468062,0.40331674,0.00088693755,0.021344198,0.31897816,0.014780228,0.16347921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004999097,0.0017031019,0.1477327,0.0012672824,0.00022375678,0.0017822699,0.39152902,0.007812621,0.022783749,0.19423251,0.23019096,0.00024211143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010409668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016133647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071368124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011051155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047217298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02596879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040042046","doi":"10.1177/1065912920938143","title":"Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disinformation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Democracy; Internet privacy; Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.19890531838338715,"score_gpt":0.5076986544846781,"score_spread":0.30879333610129095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040042046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49949262,0.0021854076,0.040394608,0.059208486,0.00032848679,0.000091736954,0.00009224535,0.00022413151,0.39798218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972047,0.00018317695,0.0007487405,0.00076522626,0.000039673014,0.000014309594,0.0000068370687,0.000013710758,0.001023527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.984871,0.009397833,0.00048407677,0.0009364181,0.0027284946,0.0015822474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94835544,0.0337344,0.007816015,0.0061865924,0.0024992875,0.0014082243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102539575,0.00044435664,0.0003604041,0.0019562887,0.005753391,0.007692808,0.0007237331,0.0040369025,0.004554008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033559147,0.00043481658,0.000511897,0.0012476946,0.029222885,0.00996442,0.010133817,0.005751757,0.00047890723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011597302,0.000051355048,0.012110508,0.00015457236,0.000043340784,0.00051278993,0.037792224,0.0016028584,0.0010680873,0.9249475,0.0024987278,0.019101955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003450291,0.00011835999,0.00882585,0.00039578878,0.000058628157,0.0007522863,0.0220958,0.0026147272,0.0026795177,0.90142184,0.060935408,0.00006737925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014743094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013082064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102539575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036803794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029119002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054228723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099907200","doi":"10.1177/1065912920971715","title":"From Generation to Generation: The Role of Grandparents in the Intergenerational Transmission of (Non-)Voting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Grandparent; Turnout; Voting; Socioeconomic status; Disadvantage; Demographic economics; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.24325716956423124,"score_gpt":0.47393896006769526,"score_spread":0.23068179050346402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099907200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945328,0.00039872443,0.0009450555,0.00046077964,0.000016833004,0.0000069086595,0.00008151629,0.0000056332233,0.0035517693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883777,0.00012240499,0.00019280512,0.000037713082,0.000005878741,0.0000032061378,0.00003951962,0.000002622024,0.0007581134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.00053233537,0.000023431267,0.00016280291,0.00009227799,0.00014527875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995749,0.0025402338,0.00072955206,0.0004648839,0.00019721092,0.00031916663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021327396,0.0001962414,0.00024253974,0.00051678135,0.00078344624,0.0011036899,0.00037299845,0.0003025231,0.0063559744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008942286,0.00018140236,0.00024134942,0.00051583035,0.0006008344,0.0010681715,0.0011023891,0.00064416614,0.0003134413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013957986,0.00010416789,0.92797774,0.000029059043,0.00016962044,0.00082436675,0.016274529,0.00024296752,0.00070435443,0.010165843,0.0006762279,0.042691607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010316669,0.00013136378,0.9843998,0.000081492,0.00015366392,0.0005081107,0.0062843333,0.00085081,0.00035976022,0.0041187806,0.0030846891,0.000016993197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010014214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013238939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010014214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033140625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043408104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021262825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121249697","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349627","title":"Rethinking Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Harm; Pornography; Democracy; Political science; Reign; Law; Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.10214964596849722,"score_gpt":0.46109998245060135,"score_spread":0.3589503364821041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121249697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054475725,0.0051980712,0.007749769,0.5174287,0.004031241,0.000060946073,0.00013131098,0.00012543339,0.41079876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91797966,0.001956691,0.0013538733,0.040247332,0.0013800317,0.000060623606,0.00003968293,0.00012964959,0.03685258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850662,0.008150573,0.00023908005,0.0017448959,0.0017603524,0.003038846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98192316,0.008812391,0.0008435971,0.0030381416,0.0029307678,0.0024518888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018577768,0.0003617288,0.0005425189,0.0013638643,0.013095727,0.009839704,0.0011986204,0.0043878052,0.013208097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03091649,0.00023558283,0.00041866896,0.0010615881,0.044508427,0.009112574,0.008421367,0.008157391,0.0016632194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019718893,0.000021545846,0.0015307958,0.00004342161,0.00000952966,0.00009450528,0.019670276,0.00015256126,0.00012719806,0.9329158,0.025643317,0.019771246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003674076,0.000031971955,0.001709498,0.0001762403,0.000010431427,0.00006386495,0.01638945,0.00021716229,0.00029717374,0.50909,0.4719556,0.000021923808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036328223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050318588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036328223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010793804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017196763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09824979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128006609","doi":"10.1177/1065912921990751","title":"Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Affect (linguistics); Persistence (discontinuity); Political science; Contingent vote; Survey data collection; Natural experiment; Political economy; Economics; Demographic economics; General election; Psychology; Politics; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.057386594031011845,"score_gpt":0.45014771094841693,"score_spread":0.3927611169174051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128006609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99682426,0.000031108182,0.00008764468,0.00014451666,0.0000050600215,0.0000027832573,0.00002197753,0.0000019110212,0.0028807088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996313,0.000009717901,0.000019456193,0.000019952222,0.0000048839984,0.0000010750147,0.000013669572,9.1881367e-7,0.0002990173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991823,0.00039905353,0.000026897238,0.00013359483,0.000079462865,0.00017868867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299276,0.0031752358,0.0018783977,0.0006387769,0.00027293613,0.0010418701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018237602,0.000089400644,0.00037534986,0.00039325454,0.0008310878,0.0012402057,0.0002136275,0.00045931115,0.006612173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072349794,0.00011139106,0.00017170461,0.00044164553,0.0010909239,0.0005870216,0.00069194235,0.0005246751,0.0006259251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013137197,0.0006940857,0.9536543,0.00008317522,0.00017541705,0.0002371026,0.0037417482,0.0012409653,0.0027422132,0.008667156,0.0013040557,0.026146203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037149868,0.00028815164,0.9904668,0.000009836039,0.000029529332,0.00010539119,0.0033036373,0.00091251713,0.00034727177,0.0026023781,0.0018839622,0.000013314077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023038227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054202173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006612173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028884812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017511194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02211994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167331783","doi":"10.1177/10659129211023590","title":"Are Political Attacks a Laughing Matter? Three Experiments on Political Humor and the Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam; Institute of Population and Public Health; Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Backlash; Political science; Advertising; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.11414942620372244,"score_gpt":0.4800217024457434,"score_spread":0.36587227624202096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167331783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99360114,0.00012897144,0.0005463102,0.00021076661,0.00003724863,0.00016451598,0.00005249734,0.000014228176,0.0052443948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688476,0.0001202493,0.00095582067,0.00020407881,0.000031064945,0.0004067256,0.00009136732,0.00001877816,0.0012871624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945029,0.003535942,0.00044653504,0.00058469066,0.00060049846,0.00032939232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8811465,0.094784014,0.012149324,0.008372975,0.0018297693,0.0017173566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007987835,0.0005548952,0.0007316923,0.00055679213,0.0014218674,0.0021852104,0.0009966039,0.0015246375,0.0059528886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051425256,0.00055177324,0.0004884269,0.00035398017,0.00329992,0.0017387543,0.0012703085,0.0018433831,0.00071295915],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10216848,0.12423807,0.22188218,0.0061800904,0.002579563,0.001281106,0.06446683,0.0075241663,0.1947763,0.028094716,0.008917627,0.23789087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015290212,0.0746581,0.72535825,0.00092714175,0.0029349576,0.0005904945,0.022123842,0.0119161,0.098621145,0.02504561,0.021819763,0.0007143396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001802564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025241731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007987835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011579302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071896304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042244256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244645105","doi":"10.1177/1065912919870605","title":"Discursive Inequity and the Internal Exclusion of Women Speakers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Public sphere; Inequality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05536214733259488,"score_gpt":0.42725721637905456,"score_spread":0.3718950690464597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244645105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993019,0.0003274468,0.0019897071,0.0038338492,0.00007480814,0.000022194161,0.00002041929,0.000011774904,0.09441796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746275,0.000049219536,0.00012743926,0.00017430946,0.000017529159,0.000010537569,0.000005673068,0.000005841462,0.002146741],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934634,0.004222843,0.00015608933,0.0005634426,0.00086972007,0.000724519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135584,0.0047026672,0.0021864346,0.0008576687,0.00043104927,0.0004663786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006804821,0.00028912834,0.00039154856,0.0010153488,0.005914713,0.0057979017,0.0006134865,0.0009046601,0.006183023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013511477,0.00019931498,0.00025872843,0.00050511246,0.017872266,0.0031337987,0.0054253065,0.0016471761,0.00048246694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021696377,0.00023916028,0.03195332,0.00008730263,0.000025700945,0.00030716535,0.8319417,0.000071376955,0.0037043828,0.10718354,0.0010333917,0.023235897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007744504,0.0003289699,0.0758517,0.0003187388,0.000051673866,0.0007176078,0.7501817,0.0007300849,0.006794102,0.0875613,0.07729119,0.000095518386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002976095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002922224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006804821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017354542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010356738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035987794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249313361","doi":"10.2307/3088030","title":"Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Politics; Political science; Public economics; Business; Public administration; Economics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.2540121165146782,"score_gpt":0.479088289027598,"score_spread":0.22507617251291978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249313361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83501506,0.0005079783,0.00053175143,0.012140853,0.00010320916,0.0001420148,0.00092893915,0.00004235606,0.15058789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878,0.00010805707,0.00013214188,0.0003122453,0.00002891593,0.000026025515,0.00011876296,0.0000071839054,0.011466659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98529774,0.0027940029,0.0003912396,0.00060765323,0.002563305,0.008346179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564001,0.014926957,0.0033769687,0.0010416248,0.00852719,0.015727272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088753225,0.00035034525,0.00082103413,0.003517248,0.012689354,0.008691596,0.0019580603,0.004021061,0.024532637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04808253,0.0005715055,0.0005843797,0.0039113685,0.0036532087,0.0017117799,0.004409636,0.00295781,0.00093137816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020945594,0.0010487904,0.40673664,0.0002782418,0.0001414469,0.0003941807,0.017691573,0.009855599,0.0010604915,0.44320944,0.052060537,0.06542848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004670611,0.00021757593,0.836977,0.00022880422,0.0001443697,0.0001049786,0.02411486,0.009498845,0.000643761,0.046941318,0.08051799,0.0001435216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94555855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06563624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06563624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08213866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4762265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311630748","doi":"10.1177/10659129221143763","title":"Why the Public Supports the Human Rights of Prisoners and Asylum Seekers: An Experimental Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public opinion; Rhetoric; International human rights law; Refugee; Norm (philosophy); Public policy; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07611823459119202,"score_gpt":0.41400479103840004,"score_spread":0.337886556447208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311630748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964801,0.00010478968,0.0035874913,0.0019966539,0.00014815983,0.0029515796,0.00023227154,0.000024090825,0.026153948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809827,0.00012934124,0.0042203367,0.0010966045,0.00012631503,0.009793663,0.00009627208,0.000014230228,0.0035405024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865529,0.009422775,0.00051240355,0.0012083699,0.0011798625,0.0011237012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426076,0.041612107,0.006772088,0.006437883,0.0016690645,0.0009012858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015872912,0.0006406701,0.0006600391,0.0009798169,0.0035816485,0.0034731424,0.0019471862,0.0025820779,0.01610932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036472254,0.00071293366,0.0008259774,0.0011631768,0.010755174,0.0034721638,0.003555733,0.0033203713,0.00089707645],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026969431,0.23631927,0.05363248,0.0021296667,0.00064888573,0.00089691434,0.055286434,0.00468248,0.033962198,0.5207998,0.0069842404,0.057688154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.051990557,0.10682549,0.10250797,0.0011437844,0.0020298448,0.00048737696,0.06475708,0.024684655,0.045323726,0.53337395,0.06621338,0.00066212186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004322847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036108955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01610932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004413877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003096654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08394498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363675809","doi":"10.1177/10659129231166679","title":"Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Presidential election; Surprise; Democracy; Victory; Political science; Politics; Public opinion; Spoilt vote; Language change; General election; Social psychology; Psychology; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.08358256831837564,"score_gpt":0.45767324344509824,"score_spread":0.3740906751267226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4363675809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99884593,0.000019333302,0.000027725544,0.00008353728,0.000002665329,0.0000025802356,0.000029874604,0.00000128023,0.0009870459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995308,0.000019633782,0.000027738868,0.000023746594,0.000007850176,0.0000045684337,0.000085795444,0.0000010815338,0.0002988025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900764,0.00036635096,0.00010132251,0.00007127393,0.00024941232,0.00020400713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839298,0.004872487,0.008023805,0.0005282272,0.0008592727,0.0017863903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025678899,0.00016053037,0.00026742314,0.0008576649,0.0008163654,0.0019437124,0.00029199658,0.0007442371,0.0042600366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010293954,0.0001916576,0.00044128468,0.00075778854,0.0009586913,0.00092127954,0.0011625648,0.001360262,0.00045365316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105278355,0.0003041761,0.99426067,0.00001324648,0.000031452306,0.000042355197,0.0017977961,0.00008889608,0.00016245514,0.00018557294,0.00019034944,0.002817758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030156148,0.000068860216,0.99747723,0.0000040815353,0.000006499437,0.000023950979,0.0019226882,0.00014400043,0.00005342543,0.00010035799,0.00019234723,0.0000035361033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003034452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006548661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042600366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046264174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014251232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377088537","doi":"10.1177/10659129231176211","title":"Jobs and Punishment: Public Opinion on Leniency for White-Collar Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"White-collar crime; Public opinion; Wrongdoing; Incentive; Legitimacy; Affect (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); Business; Retributive justice; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.3771322186534036,"score_gpt":0.5457266805041591,"score_spread":0.1685944618507555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377088537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98603475,0.00007563802,0.00008811277,0.0047791484,0.000023719507,0.000012971139,0.0000346129,0.0000028613301,0.008948247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945766,0.00003269835,0.000013873387,0.00026643023,0.000020841322,0.000005063842,0.000011025611,7.6421236e-7,0.00019153391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614954,0.0021909373,0.00012496443,0.00022570071,0.0005587303,0.0007501821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95898366,0.017436853,0.017412923,0.0010515692,0.0025809854,0.0025339215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006435611,0.00017644609,0.0002938888,0.0011858614,0.0018697344,0.0021621739,0.0003341438,0.0013659734,0.0074633663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026403103,0.00015145267,0.00037170795,0.0007652307,0.003458815,0.0010493026,0.0012076815,0.0016632029,0.00037307487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080087123,0.0022216593,0.9267648,0.000101643454,0.00012215131,0.00034964926,0.015145057,0.00029013658,0.0009232593,0.009201512,0.0041566133,0.039922535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088621084,0.0004768289,0.96379304,0.00008343923,0.00008204337,0.00007627051,0.027503666,0.0009624532,0.0005298991,0.002214467,0.004160215,0.000029037361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063945497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058448655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074633663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001884172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013546216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034035206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381513502","doi":"10.1177/10659129231183915","title":"Hierarchical Interactions and Compliance in Comparative Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scholarship; Compliance (psychology); Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3859601098573573,"score_gpt":0.5436304890340797,"score_spread":0.15767037917672244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381513502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483393,0.00032249416,0.004669554,0.0010323618,0.000012231518,0.000046737077,0.00008793232,0.000030349469,0.045459107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988959,0.00003040089,0.00057883526,0.00005333798,0.000006837243,0.00001319903,0.000029465413,0.000004984129,0.0003871437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96957,0.017978426,0.0014505545,0.0027163618,0.0056074755,0.0026772202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94752055,0.02267655,0.017990058,0.0051039634,0.0050591948,0.0016497201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015117524,0.00015861822,0.00052064774,0.002997287,0.0042357245,0.0047522197,0.0010095859,0.0010593291,0.0057899496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06738417,0.00031263728,0.0003344976,0.0052447915,0.00840937,0.0030316142,0.0042885905,0.0010943322,0.00028411593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021423484,0.00030746372,0.4303967,0.00015299054,0.0002023026,0.00042016528,0.052319374,0.0064871404,0.0016546933,0.45627987,0.0015137141,0.05005129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081760736,0.00032133088,0.80453724,0.00028062658,0.00012344809,0.00021735807,0.025431132,0.009363233,0.0011926516,0.14191636,0.016443882,0.00009097717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029906685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031564873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029906685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059191156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047140135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079950094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386157206","doi":"10.1177/10659129231196566","title":"The Conditional Lawmaking Benefits of Party Faction Membership in Congress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislature; Politics; Political economy; Law and economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.28601788881659296,"score_gpt":0.5092373098453249,"score_spread":0.22321942102873193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386157206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838087,0.00008028439,0.0002422828,0.00046406654,0.000009943336,0.000009196293,0.000041421164,0.000006347775,0.015337788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940276,0.000019760986,0.000073738425,0.00003824937,0.0000129369,0.000004549229,0.000020920366,0.0000013717013,0.00042558418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754816,0.0010913275,0.00010291664,0.0002724759,0.00040780398,0.00057744747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698998,0.01739855,0.0065400237,0.0025607303,0.0013701492,0.0022308903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004003779,0.00009914243,0.0003238416,0.00067216,0.0010560921,0.002019851,0.0004309977,0.00085688726,0.0103758015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029398683,0.00014773672,0.0002278818,0.00074187556,0.002009492,0.001750665,0.0019836994,0.0013061832,0.0005319912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026667693,0.0025648077,0.7193875,0.00034234175,0.00035238068,0.00057734345,0.0069437786,0.005567648,0.017900104,0.09273132,0.002309758,0.14865628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005710005,0.0007573829,0.97124916,0.000054944587,0.00009455271,0.00018580051,0.003404125,0.0014292122,0.0021493395,0.014380067,0.0062153116,0.000023027025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095053297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031009626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103758015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074428145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007477258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034710526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386505911","doi":"10.1177/10659129231194270","title":"Issue Responsiveness in Canadian Politics: Are Parties Responsive to the Public Salience of Climate Change in the Question Period?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Political science; Politics; Climate change; Elite; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.5159062364615182,"score_gpt":0.5598716785761435,"score_spread":0.043965442114625275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386505911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8817308,0.00059436075,0.001319125,0.006634616,0.00010228459,0.00014527995,0.0003846497,0.00002233303,0.10906651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996114,0.00021119267,0.00025240416,0.00057901215,0.000022868466,0.000037768717,0.00012461461,0.000012949042,0.002645009],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206185,0.0018064167,0.00021331213,0.00074996025,0.0028722235,0.0022962168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816901,0.008054764,0.003177174,0.00080727856,0.004617936,0.0016526963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416562,0.00025988175,0.00035313042,0.0030349484,0.010175641,0.0064914604,0.00109613,0.0012622591,0.0059412722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043890167,0.00032188796,0.00038248548,0.004968557,0.005102178,0.0020288667,0.0035891864,0.0021718969,0.0004118369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047649414,0.0001503449,0.39320984,0.00033552898,0.000102684346,0.00058142754,0.47843242,0.0005289038,0.0046068896,0.039131794,0.012383933,0.07005976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021754813,0.000030575804,0.6835258,0.00015350842,0.00005306587,0.000075513635,0.2562458,0.00081659213,0.0007729367,0.0030968962,0.055115424,0.00009208797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92993873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94997126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07006127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046226136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03575102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3353957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391946084","doi":"10.1177/10659129241234839","title":"Exploring the Threat of Fake News: Facts, Opinions, and Judgement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Judgement; Disinformation; Misinformation; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Public opinion; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Fake news; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy; Social media","score_opus":0.40596264149483197,"score_gpt":0.49018699451360265,"score_spread":0.08422435301877068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391946084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30795968,0.008657577,0.01805092,0.16101213,0.00083784177,0.000073829986,0.00017641812,0.000047488815,0.5031841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909332,0.0017509683,0.0009066862,0.003266828,0.0001722743,0.000017078755,0.000018316858,0.000012538894,0.0029222812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841376,0.009218708,0.00036040295,0.0007412386,0.004126972,0.0014150073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94146526,0.046014052,0.005626975,0.0024491162,0.003597577,0.00084701116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013211547,0.0004199849,0.000513894,0.0026281318,0.009501559,0.015576802,0.00090388756,0.0074685463,0.004317858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04950136,0.00041694814,0.0004370781,0.0016043251,0.035141807,0.017585153,0.0057646614,0.008162824,0.000598044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009024891,0.000045534984,0.0066086357,0.0001287177,0.000027165275,0.0010874928,0.05837537,0.00088421383,0.00038276074,0.9053772,0.006556225,0.020436456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054745302,0.000105886626,0.0068635354,0.00072292134,0.000052458894,0.001044043,0.090386465,0.0027375538,0.0013456701,0.8050271,0.091537856,0.00012185872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012232785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009441662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015576802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069896984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031632187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069870174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395046023","doi":"10.1177/10659129241248406","title":"Mechanisms of Political Responsiveness: The Information Sources Shaping Elected Representatives' Policy Actions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Parliament; Political action; Public administration; Public policy; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.18156674867475991,"score_gpt":0.5088835050591657,"score_spread":0.32731675638440577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395046023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82427233,0.0013945071,0.03126981,0.011341388,0.00013028113,0.00026499853,0.0006226658,0.00025875343,0.13044526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960764,0.00025102517,0.0018941653,0.00029838845,0.000051370273,0.00007093791,0.00011366882,0.000038903218,0.0012051217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809234,0.012985211,0.00066345785,0.0016869237,0.0022545683,0.0014864728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9112658,0.06766874,0.011049094,0.0046692877,0.003765675,0.0015813767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01595647,0.00047187554,0.0005824313,0.0058437795,0.0022010135,0.009773428,0.0010085885,0.0016185605,0.0076841344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06684471,0.0006860695,0.00053207256,0.004808267,0.0040770266,0.0058746296,0.0039092028,0.0018933411,0.0011509577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085925724,0.00075536646,0.4253237,0.0010154389,0.0006423742,0.0014035694,0.13235155,0.0049234764,0.010299883,0.20334655,0.005232822,0.21384609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026138884,0.0006667488,0.56350774,0.0011041169,0.0005749258,0.0007943647,0.11855658,0.012444467,0.007801758,0.20449327,0.08940577,0.00038885736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031001891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016057388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01595647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002455427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022206118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084386945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399264791","doi":"10.1177/10659129241257856","title":"Representational Style Across National and Constituency Contexts: Members of Parliament in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Parliament; Style (visual arts); Variation (astronomy); Demographics; Sample (material); Political science; Geography; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.16692333551840202,"score_gpt":0.4960754523194646,"score_spread":0.3291521168010626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399264791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956287,0.00010268345,0.00005306217,0.00025388986,0.0000075852104,0.000010553331,0.000046175,0.0000020122627,0.0038953065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984102,0.0000919881,0.00006137466,0.00005880813,0.0000025354536,0.0000063342204,0.000031921812,0.0000040047075,0.0013327511],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967288,0.0010928761,0.0001450605,0.00023763106,0.0008010139,0.000994622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953923,0.0010366587,0.0008649082,0.00015604393,0.0013164494,0.0012336606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024234762,0.00015948631,0.00039738129,0.0015714953,0.0066961045,0.0029008482,0.0006453072,0.0004944086,0.002960179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008338656,0.0002101855,0.00016263293,0.002730742,0.0038947468,0.0010003143,0.002802255,0.0008641956,0.0002635492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001692719,0.000033594122,0.23212904,0.00009451313,0.000027530503,0.0005528995,0.7399754,0.000077097444,0.0012296262,0.0019774202,0.001335603,0.022398092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037484122,0.000032770382,0.4656583,0.00006664572,0.000009582071,0.00016956628,0.5221359,0.0001092142,0.00021276918,0.0001462613,0.0114231715,0.00003198187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7850005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9056425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2149995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009903784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009617574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4325313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411683287","doi":"10.1177/10659129251355606","title":"Examining the Effects of 2SLGBTQI+ Candidates on 2SLGBTQI+ Voter Turnout in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; McMaster University; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voter turnout; Turnout; Political science; Demographic economics; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.05346100559021138,"score_gpt":0.4039413867672941,"score_spread":0.3504803811770827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411683287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99176556,0.00009506521,0.000051058036,0.00060034264,0.000011379101,0.000019197647,0.00061718485,0.000006109573,0.0068341615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972132,0.000064321815,0.000040562696,0.000058026853,0.0000028536333,0.000007718039,0.00025254584,0.00000287503,0.0023579777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980725,0.0002573958,0.000039207825,0.00017807892,0.00040094974,0.0010518121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996396,0.0004348821,0.00055609486,0.00012271492,0.0010740241,0.0014162876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011527967,0.00023512909,0.00037728762,0.0009839156,0.004651689,0.0013718036,0.00086195295,0.00036354468,0.00641955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004110322,0.00018591441,0.00041914318,0.001997187,0.0013529777,0.00031918474,0.0016065096,0.00090746704,0.0004344673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004305276,0.000095558265,0.9674945,0.00004920227,0.000048829155,0.00013853482,0.00850083,0.0005208798,0.00058480515,0.002198036,0.004939049,0.014999186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015240392,0.000044116146,0.9851849,0.000023118217,0.000019384199,0.00002004047,0.010687269,0.0004539746,0.00016403444,0.000079236816,0.003293831,0.000014931853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030169845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030169845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028552407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2188986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413767348","doi":"10.1177/10659129251365875","title":"Neighboring Groups and Political Attacks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09336881144052239,"score_gpt":0.5115225167540441,"score_spread":0.41815370531352175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413767348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977262,0.00007742147,0.00012058323,0.00017607865,0.000015336564,0.000009161646,0.000009938199,0.0000032492055,0.022326136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988657,0.00005046286,0.000069802445,0.000050113817,0.000006404269,0.0000062485506,0.000012068115,0.000002549396,0.0009364829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888414,0.000693556,0.00002252758,0.00013844132,0.00014524988,0.00011606588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590117,0.0017904135,0.0011505557,0.00036329354,0.00013578267,0.0006587587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009246648,0.0002085243,0.00021546036,0.00044448077,0.0016445387,0.0018633052,0.000230376,0.00064869586,0.009025545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044175372,0.00015279936,0.00018025181,0.00023486225,0.0019767305,0.00079786277,0.0017700352,0.00084796763,0.00031683448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026601101,0.005388206,0.7251039,0.00036315317,0.00027898912,0.0011837671,0.10089629,0.0008846159,0.023441676,0.041685794,0.003435066,0.09467835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120725745,0.0011702252,0.92156285,0.00009810844,0.00017627633,0.00041333213,0.054842304,0.00081227557,0.0014616617,0.0062615573,0.01303881,0.000041877647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017825341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031649543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009025545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048686436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023120095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030193448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}