{"meta":{"query_hash":"ef2b842f8668","filters":{"venue":"Political Research Quarterly"},"cohort_total":61,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":61,"exported":61,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ef2b842f8668","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Research+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1966298473","doi":"10.1177/1065912911427449","title":"Separate but Not Equal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Politics; Electoral politics; Political science; Electoral reform; Ceiling (cloud); Electoral system; Natural experiment; Test (biology); Glass ceiling; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Demographic economics; Law; Economics; Statistics; Democracy; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.38027246864310027,"score_gpt":0.5012837606199578,"score_spread":0.12101129197685756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966298473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28072417,0.000014053542,0.00045370127,0.0030034936,0.00021843484,0.00024815014,0.000015644111,0.000068597146,0.7152538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899544,0.0000040703726,0.0001972658,0.00022076145,0.00050915446,0.000032250802,0.00000308378,0.000012277812,0.009066731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957384,0.0008889944,0.00021369202,0.00028183052,0.0011647743,0.0017123146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792826,0.0004772933,0.000019027195,0.00025782554,0.00039567432,0.0009218932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020176554,0.00008577947,0.00011873319,0.00016448573,0.000613714,0.00014439858,0.00036071238,0.00012119567,0.0009120943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052312866,0.00007809073,0.00007297257,0.0002444097,0.0010565125,0.0001891554,0.00003406534,0.0003497022,0.0017574158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017277329,0.000083131934,0.000315195,0.0000064597,0.000009019712,0.000021160535,0.018292595,1.6130723e-8,0.00025886006,0.97854483,0.0007205258,0.00173091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035629928,0.00066506874,0.012948671,0.00001103614,0.0000088417755,0.0000029584785,0.06605562,0.00007835585,0.0033201082,0.90272194,0.0135925235,0.00023859185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038141377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080136623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70923024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015047347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048274346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969774453","doi":"10.1177/1065912909358583","title":"Strategic Vote Choice in One-round and Two-round Elections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Test (biology); Political science; General election; Approval voting; Social psychology; Psychology; Cardinal voting systems; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.24790196064404632,"score_gpt":0.5080655312814356,"score_spread":0.26016357063738926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969774453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9329056,0.000019704266,0.000022582095,0.009536396,0.00015383295,0.00033191583,0.000006149039,0.000043341275,0.056980453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997334,7.684495e-7,0.00004569355,0.00009077108,0.0009829018,0.0000713822,0.0000028360378,0.000012202091,0.0014594314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960228,0.0008557149,0.00029500213,0.00031760975,0.00078361103,0.0017252552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689245,0.0016767808,0.00002087842,0.00020261649,0.0002763201,0.00093095965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023457971,0.00010413406,0.00017610403,0.00020968654,0.00061630306,0.000451921,0.000189821,0.00017171804,0.0001606778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011102374,0.000103215214,0.000036800328,0.0005737605,0.000974802,0.00033080654,0.000016880516,0.0010369286,0.00014717046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007418688,0.000118474054,0.02095875,0.000013840125,0.0000047005306,0.00000374573,0.0005601146,7.06225e-8,0.0023039768,0.97530884,0.00004558061,0.00067447644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057780073,0.0007728346,0.13260315,0.000036743244,0.000008869209,0.0000033887468,0.0016593115,0.0002905,0.00010971771,0.8564194,0.007252757,0.0002655694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34548324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.594972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24948876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021534116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046262395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6588752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970262444","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500201","title":"The Ghent System and Union Membership in Europe, 1970-1996","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Receipt; Economics; Labour economics; Income protection insurance; Demographic economics; Control (management); Trade union; Insurance policy; General insurance; Economic growth; Actuarial science; Geography","score_opus":0.10489102387961154,"score_gpt":0.3922902800749383,"score_spread":0.2873992561953268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970262444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43004924,0.0007165721,0.000014577311,0.05559788,0.00026858252,0.00066705956,0.00001596772,0.00008266956,0.5125874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476534,0.000091501286,0.00000791462,0.00014153554,0.00019244851,0.000025038675,6.8888966e-7,0.000007908919,0.0047676405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958748,0.0017664334,0.00018396843,0.0002006917,0.0008519609,0.0011221231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768317,0.0014079465,0.000013987312,0.00020478602,0.0002425658,0.00044755795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034976925,0.00006697184,0.0000893232,0.00009215098,0.0009117687,0.0003122024,0.00028477414,0.000056391484,0.00010143711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009310081,0.000045362598,0.000018368606,0.0006481405,0.00073136145,0.00012529941,0.00003575154,0.00032805224,0.000058827944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029487412,0.000040612606,0.0009017837,0.000005878446,0.000003524096,0.000013563934,0.0033584605,2.1847338e-8,0.000008235026,0.98406005,0.00088603486,0.0107188625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007806308,0.00072961114,0.089247085,0.00013932674,0.000007704236,0.0000028758561,0.07958326,0.00065745256,0.000018782594,0.039105207,0.78945386,0.00027423212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019855322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013563413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9449549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021251135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079511716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98667157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970494169","doi":"10.1177/106591290005300407","title":"Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Situational ethics; Political science; Voting; Affect (linguistics); Identity (music); Gender identity; Politics; General election; Test (biology); Ideology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3546987589204944,"score_gpt":0.47978436384212925,"score_spread":0.12508560492163484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970494169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534568,0.00043954546,0.000021565498,0.00701523,0.00011328885,0.0005104173,0.000008894023,0.00004685025,0.23838747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934618,0.000021879754,0.00002582398,0.00010766499,0.00036899638,0.000041078114,0.0000026808389,0.000009552132,0.0059605143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996062,0.001128292,0.00021117498,0.0002910075,0.00082558347,0.0014819872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980251,0.0010391346,0.00001007024,0.0001697762,0.00011517769,0.0006407496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018431069,0.00007966112,0.00012868097,0.00017049682,0.00034605045,0.00025338196,0.00017881065,0.00012517987,0.00027952564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043084926,0.00007462673,0.000028502476,0.0002750035,0.0007486397,0.0001820996,0.000010276834,0.0003653459,0.0002249381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012932682,0.00011680266,0.014710709,0.000067330446,0.000007958912,0.000021317,0.02029117,0.0000025079278,0.000059923703,0.95366526,0.00056320644,0.010480856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022120469,0.000650605,0.36381504,0.00012090562,0.000014078126,0.0000132941095,0.3506932,0.004684481,0.00005615191,0.18129373,0.09577217,0.00067432696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06858893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037104748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7723716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018353222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022450977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9376134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984778247","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304109","title":"Presidents, Political Context, and Economic Accountability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Institutionalisation; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Voting; Political economy; Voting behavior; Survey data collection; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.07627312439421254,"score_gpt":0.47733380456356705,"score_spread":0.40106068016935453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984778247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666173,0.00013120002,0.00022842569,0.0126574,0.00021585586,0.00042308588,0.00005093361,0.00009073059,0.41958502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969737,0.00001308001,0.00016965842,0.0008712425,0.00091049826,0.000017569317,0.0000028769973,0.000017437898,0.0010239279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428195,0.00062717486,0.00041097726,0.0004398746,0.00096426957,0.0032757544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282384,0.0044057686,0.00003028324,0.00034650892,0.00025623848,0.0021373373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006356877,0.000144921,0.00025543672,0.000118584736,0.0008702335,0.00023410085,0.00040118708,0.00021603405,0.00055853993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014794779,0.00014618372,0.000103980106,0.00015320814,0.0047167335,0.00027831912,0.000077206314,0.00060651044,0.00030475983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015700376,0.00006381377,0.0067155687,0.000012562517,0.000012884986,0.000006852197,0.0045576477,7.1768116e-9,0.000016144704,0.9829167,0.0011477203,0.004534357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052858604,0.0005619072,0.06106214,0.000026149188,0.000013681139,0.000006625432,0.14977087,0.00007034198,0.00008712878,0.7028758,0.084624186,0.00037259504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100576825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005726542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43035638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011618428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076338055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991634631","doi":"10.1177/1065912909357177","title":"Contradictory Calculi","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Microeconomics; Voter turnout; Bullet voting; Function (biology); Economics; Public economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Cardinal voting systems; Political science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Law","score_opus":0.14153476593502443,"score_gpt":0.49767329931143645,"score_spread":0.356138533376412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991634631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67575824,0.00001699915,0.00012784239,0.024016583,0.0005917351,0.0003754371,0.0000113124215,0.00012550612,0.29897636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949968,3.5351522e-7,0.000043862892,0.00023317746,0.0017731353,0.000057373218,0.000002604635,0.00001169249,0.002881009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574405,0.00083912193,0.00023456398,0.00023177057,0.0010789366,0.0018715829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654603,0.0013311112,0.000015730235,0.00025050223,0.00040546988,0.0014511753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028388347,0.00008314852,0.00014337257,0.00011212368,0.0006939713,0.00019366512,0.00028337666,0.00018946288,0.0011609601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020647286,0.000074877295,0.000067632005,0.00028552557,0.0014783922,0.00018773461,0.000011295297,0.000846778,0.0012903385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062721692,0.00005932389,0.0022436294,0.000006339421,0.000004421061,0.00000692776,0.0012030227,5.3295417e-9,0.002378416,0.9897224,0.0018417547,0.0025275103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036324194,0.00057320006,0.024151325,0.000017590044,0.00000771624,0.0000025232748,0.002172746,0.00007868493,0.00053787226,0.511862,0.45997337,0.00025977023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044573862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020742608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47786042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001421269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000496032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992108282","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500303","title":"Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Nomination; Politics; Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.21372108820387303,"score_gpt":0.4678759746180191,"score_spread":0.2541548864141461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992108282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49160692,0.000056997098,0.0000022120955,0.118819274,0.00031391106,0.0004318628,0.000031168674,0.000051661398,0.38868597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943879,0.0000043864297,0.000041066785,0.001804801,0.001066558,0.00009517596,0.0000020645957,0.000018343291,0.0025796702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018806,0.0014663461,0.00029136395,0.00033148995,0.0012285847,0.0064941766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99077326,0.0017547241,0.000010112234,0.00024207096,0.0002779847,0.0069418647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017825648,0.00013492895,0.00022429487,0.00059647433,0.00058372586,0.00023818393,0.00048409947,0.00022513626,0.0020825716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071441345,0.00014360623,0.000068516536,0.00090153754,0.0014526021,0.00019770171,0.000026913642,0.0006362209,0.0022726906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047447425,0.00006408151,0.028026497,0.000008439117,0.000005332268,0.000056202276,0.03680051,2.0611385e-8,0.0000051791208,0.9308264,0.003098159,0.0011044218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039171826,0.00062118773,0.019519582,0.00008123389,0.000008830027,0.0000021414976,0.25261566,0.000070195485,0.00013036291,0.41054848,0.3155413,0.00046931088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85876054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81070006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5202779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022033995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011665459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993559288","doi":"10.1177/1065912910379227","title":"Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":636,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Mainstreaming; Gender mainstreaming; Sociology; Power (physics); Frame (networking); Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; Gender equality; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.16879161333293644,"score_gpt":0.5278332544710013,"score_spread":0.3590416411380648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993559288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61156434,0.0000073197366,0.00003821888,0.020694796,0.001032863,0.00019136386,0.00004773679,0.00006483899,0.36635855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915073,8.395743e-7,0.00009072112,0.001177712,0.0015708946,0.00007952578,0.000009931646,0.000019314917,0.0055437493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968302,0.0006354663,0.00029837107,0.0003858226,0.0005596392,0.0012904909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961462,0.0022294093,0.000022969125,0.00056659064,0.00029142605,0.00074340357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013018074,0.00012124365,0.00014547944,0.00033971955,0.0005441217,0.00016343563,0.00018281552,0.00019058166,0.0073499437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001166825,0.00011509312,0.00008362243,0.00018956763,0.0006657661,0.00010140533,0.00002261623,0.0016150897,0.0061375545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002679508,0.00029349152,0.0051738853,0.00003613191,0.000016854628,0.000035613637,0.00057072734,1.3425801e-8,0.00024168626,0.95964754,0.030736823,0.0032204383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058927847,0.0011592915,0.20336935,0.000008864258,0.0000095961495,0.00009752975,0.0011778756,0.000014895875,0.000049267037,0.78495276,0.008389559,0.00018170616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014384958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033450348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.379943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028578175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995079105","doi":"10.1177/1065912907305221","title":"How Sophisticated Can a Voter Be to Make Causal Attributions? A Response to Gomez and Wilson's Comment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Voting; Attribution; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.17415545386718956,"score_gpt":0.4772837426975364,"score_spread":0.3031282888303468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995079105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50062853,0.000007802479,0.0017765759,0.4957655,0.000072092655,0.00063095725,0.00007783014,0.00004806839,0.000992661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922536,2.4797643e-7,0.00015555602,0.0037718362,0.00045506813,0.0001105616,0.000008046126,0.000016306123,0.0032287664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403703,0.0014754061,0.0003022811,0.00040408806,0.0012428224,0.002538382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932009,0.0026108918,0.000019444713,0.00028864815,0.0006006577,0.0032794457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064135967,0.00014863227,0.00023725737,0.00032920841,0.00077370025,0.00046005912,0.00023289754,0.00015444634,0.00005132941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051626563,0.00013874033,0.00004608232,0.00080062804,0.0005948114,0.00009342076,0.000057307243,0.00036802335,0.0001225676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039329834,0.00010636815,0.0015441803,0.000015159696,0.000012041278,0.00003831931,0.0042227493,4.3324153e-8,0.0023055752,0.98469913,0.0048515107,0.0018116535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011177857,0.008133995,0.15526167,0.00016032388,0.00003432831,0.0000102995755,0.0121034905,0.00007387863,0.0012184863,0.073406994,0.7476456,0.0008331357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029846983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0317215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91129214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010043499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035036533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012536499","doi":"10.1177/1065912910376385","title":"Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":337,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Public policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.33685300385527284,"score_gpt":0.5182908525237124,"score_spread":0.1814378486684396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012536499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8206383,0.000024031395,0.00055152277,0.077726886,0.00026974952,0.0001844762,0.000073061,0.00006674008,0.100465216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970384,0.000006337978,0.00026627467,0.0002319099,0.0018687579,0.00002685239,0.000012103001,0.000011307269,0.0005380103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966896,0.0005905893,0.00019688373,0.00034375547,0.0009138538,0.0012652809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716413,0.001173987,0.000023497181,0.00023481518,0.00037403504,0.0010295196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016341265,0.00008714648,0.0001198546,0.00024000095,0.0009306656,0.0005161903,0.00025829507,0.00015170603,0.00011724883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018651072,0.00008322192,0.00005050896,0.00023807633,0.0014629886,0.00051322737,0.000066397864,0.00070075673,0.000052248266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030379053,0.000055873457,0.00081966625,0.000004800713,0.000010140568,0.0000026160324,0.0052185874,7.662634e-8,0.0005649113,0.9878726,0.00012241844,0.005325242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013246221,0.00004874467,0.006605274,0.0000048396096,0.0000025221348,0.0000013264016,0.01903137,0.0005690372,0.0000441979,0.97064054,0.0028304728,0.000089192516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17970422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012059875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17640014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015347745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008718733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8257582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020852836","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500110","title":"Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991-1995","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conservatism; Charter; Political science; Voting; Law; Context (archaeology); Roberts Court; Principal (computer security); Politics","score_opus":0.12749155805501733,"score_gpt":0.40548025179090824,"score_spread":0.2779886937358909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020852836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7871309,0.0016135938,0.000103372964,0.07060625,0.00042840524,0.00065271347,0.000073730014,0.000026513737,0.13936453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930084,0.00006862648,0.000044896417,0.00023169954,0.00019461804,0.000021796988,7.0135576e-7,0.000004459326,0.00013233966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963339,0.00043860136,0.00028757748,0.00020442379,0.00171769,0.0010178242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630594,0.0029644398,0.000027249494,0.0001615206,0.0003218779,0.00021894043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013789047,0.00008554927,0.00019015878,0.00009363546,0.000877635,0.00003810972,0.00035062397,0.000049052174,0.00038602718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012740634,0.00005539556,0.000052246614,0.0004971747,0.0016650455,0.000090207766,0.000063450585,0.00039088694,0.00007401573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021487738,0.000090501446,0.019043842,0.000004124417,0.000017418444,0.000040144594,0.00193687,0.0000018373211,0.0000131927545,0.9588746,0.012228006,0.007727975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007148656,0.0004932596,0.32866338,0.00047285238,0.00002957508,0.00000809301,0.053593922,0.0008179285,0.000015361691,0.48449326,0.13028269,0.0004148396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47438136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007946973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009708005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67501473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021049489","doi":"10.1177/1065912912461307","title":"Congressional Politics of U.S. Immigration Reforms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Immigration; Politics; Political science; Negotiation; Immigration policy; Political economy; Public opinion; Immigration reform; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07748015581296601,"score_gpt":0.4512185268682029,"score_spread":0.3737383710552369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021049489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8353553,0.00023908261,0.0007261311,0.005124548,0.0004092785,0.00038004358,0.000042070817,0.00005588474,0.15766768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939956,0.000019339474,0.0002011639,0.00008879933,0.0011475153,0.000026497564,0.000030299174,0.000009234818,0.004481543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624133,0.00066559715,0.00034463377,0.00014542966,0.0013957688,0.0012072527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773455,0.00052803574,0.000050991384,0.00019992763,0.0008139638,0.0006725489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790618,0.000087801025,0.0001464928,0.00020661695,0.0005715159,0.00006826713,0.00021530839,0.00015688327,0.00063802075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011913816,0.00006724094,0.000076835095,0.00031429614,0.0008479584,0.00069981994,0.000014132385,0.0002876526,0.0002067727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009684665,0.00012972114,0.0033841273,0.000012561871,0.0000058755936,2.4954645e-7,0.014294561,1.8237353e-8,0.00066417723,0.97660035,0.002675215,0.002223449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006327966,0.0015179012,0.04763487,0.00015092983,0.000022757318,0.0000046803807,0.10837537,0.00026574088,0.011122974,0.5123076,0.3174882,0.0004762228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072395853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020567433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4642928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003031343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004902323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031101128","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304501","title":"Retrospective Economic Accountability under Authoritarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Authoritarianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); China; Mainland China; Political science; Panel data; Revenue; Nationality; Public administration; Local government; Development economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Accounting; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.06804154293687427,"score_gpt":0.4524899138525372,"score_spread":0.3844483709156629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031101128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7106584,0.000025775682,0.0004429183,0.008225873,0.00042494258,0.00030109042,0.000046928835,0.000058649755,0.27981544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994675,0.000007961376,0.00011450286,0.00018442994,0.0013377435,0.000013664984,0.0000025216152,0.00001600774,0.003648164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628574,0.00026749013,0.00035557602,0.00047201233,0.0007018129,0.0019173726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978234,0.0007747244,0.00004794896,0.00037587062,0.00019439028,0.00078367034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008318657,0.00012730598,0.00022734917,0.00009553312,0.000925362,0.00025830552,0.00046890634,0.00022123908,0.0010357046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045744624,0.00011840254,0.000127817,0.00014166634,0.001502359,0.0005144657,0.000045468038,0.000702535,0.0012435615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023471686,0.00005273084,0.005846056,0.000003937919,0.000011484838,0.00000464733,0.005562149,1.03749095e-7,0.00001549816,0.9853345,0.0008019619,0.0023434663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021084573,0.00019833454,0.23311459,0.0000058966293,0.0000023619598,0.000001003021,0.020706106,0.000012779267,0.00002215707,0.7230625,0.022520378,0.0001430609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09974459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048694316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2840166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055325576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089707447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037359044","doi":"10.1177/1065912909352775","title":"Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Judicial activism; Political science; Law; Voting; Judicial opinion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Case selection; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.056460416537896574,"score_gpt":0.3829438105350005,"score_spread":0.3264833939971039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037359044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437982,0.000026050222,0.0000033634235,0.053067025,0.00019392945,0.00016987177,0.00006906086,0.000005562827,0.0026669477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986952,0.000012567544,0.0000034807993,0.00045166016,0.00021252531,0.000010556966,0.0000045558477,0.0000030167325,0.00060645374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980073,0.00039693524,0.00014121129,0.00014216699,0.00068804336,0.00062432163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979897,0.0012488107,0.00002730008,0.00011712997,0.00037640272,0.00024061688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001083,0.00006636819,0.00010710937,0.000042697382,0.0014482635,0.000040328654,0.00018284534,0.000065849425,0.00009241257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010349887,0.000039895458,0.000016179662,0.00022737468,0.0069259773,0.000046821035,0.00008374635,0.0003467574,0.000003241867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983309,0.000012673046,0.01756161,0.000003234894,0.000013178376,0.0000018423357,0.0010658434,1.4057504e-7,0.000085048574,0.9792608,0.0018398816,0.00014775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014203278,0.00007720481,0.45704547,0.000010227734,0.000012759976,0.0000028477614,0.003957063,0.000007801617,0.00012249929,0.51705325,0.021499062,0.000069781316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46220756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011928453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082110375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043953143","doi":"10.1177/1065912914524831","title":"Race, Party, and the Consequences of Restricting Early Voting in Florida in the 2012 General Election","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Straight-ticket voting; Group voting ticket; Political science; First-past-the-post voting; Legislature; Instant-runoff voting; Disapproval voting; Split-ticket voting; Spoilt vote; Demographic economics; Race (biology); Cardinal voting systems; Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09682191908473017,"score_gpt":0.4357739978005059,"score_spread":0.3389520787157757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043953143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736614,0.00007001465,0.00005227229,0.017070029,0.00005935168,0.0003489797,9.819491e-7,0.000007928966,0.0087290015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992752,0.0000029418516,0.000013924317,0.00008900147,0.00042151765,0.00006356526,5.097564e-7,0.0000041974513,0.00012914585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928835,0.004949336,0.00035847505,0.0001632275,0.0007024808,0.0009429655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942636,0.00529034,0.000043111344,0.0001183903,0.00013860533,0.0001459391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010931311,0.000066074055,0.00017165324,0.00012411832,0.00034903275,0.00014673913,0.00020957699,0.00008010828,0.000012238412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035247244,0.000039439303,0.0000316672,0.0006031393,0.0014618274,0.00020338938,0.000013825149,0.00044784628,0.000010066163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028364111,0.000017268158,0.07011927,0.000010828253,0.0000017743123,9.658329e-7,0.00560808,6.409566e-7,0.00014870457,0.9227771,0.000054444612,0.0012325333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012449654,0.0008077704,0.48934716,0.00011294068,0.000008963348,0.000003104077,0.009628703,0.0022664107,0.00023501048,0.49469188,0.0014810642,0.00017203383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25851047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03881752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42808527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008649149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013569406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97872156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046587431","doi":"10.1177/1065912913520573","title":"Strategic Voting and Coordination Problems in Proportional Systems","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportional representation; Voting; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Electoral system; Straight-ticket voting; Contingent vote; Ranked voting system; Coordination game; Public administration; Political economy; Group voting ticket; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.17723868462090087,"score_gpt":0.45216201145942825,"score_spread":0.2749233268385274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046587431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410348,0.0000404476,0.00036092178,0.0068050195,0.00009856364,0.0005872419,0.000002897824,0.000044045486,0.05102605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986696,3.6725726e-7,0.000012551904,0.000023142815,0.00042973223,0.00010119552,0.0000041442217,0.0000073863566,0.00075186015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613214,0.0014570648,0.0003135535,0.00022673611,0.00080359733,0.0010669382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983363,0.0007942357,0.000030053065,0.000080093814,0.00030159063,0.0004577305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004792152,0.00007110578,0.00014052104,0.0001550198,0.00032298078,0.00026441377,0.000097586846,0.000107825945,0.00002818283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085896347,0.00006425127,0.000019219136,0.00031072946,0.0004372992,0.0002018063,0.00000991086,0.00028311386,0.000060807964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025286433,0.000041784086,0.02286286,0.00006226231,0.0000017347576,8.954561e-7,0.00081889395,0.0000028253685,0.000105365034,0.97556007,0.000038108235,0.0005026855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068536436,0.0013900152,0.09254909,0.0002949832,0.000006280703,0.0000038619546,0.009728882,0.028181938,0.000014051572,0.86246103,0.0043419977,0.00034252528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05239475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069927247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11309905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023648949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019120004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9539154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047227654","doi":"10.1177/106591290605900401","title":"Party, Ideology, and Vote Intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French Electoral Panel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Multinomial logistic regression; Political science; Identification (biology); Panel data; Legislature; Single non-transferable vote; Econometrics; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.12562642278652342,"score_gpt":0.42401245136406474,"score_spread":0.2983860285775413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047227654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90597934,0.0003831008,0.0006994625,0.06357421,0.00026404177,0.0005381845,0.000111062094,0.00009328985,0.028357329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959151,0.0000019013787,0.00004393423,0.00022845007,0.0009854499,0.00006910105,0.000026080517,0.000011352398,0.0027186156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953456,0.0015391686,0.0003343025,0.00030325385,0.0009231904,0.0015545173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996368,0.0025281613,0.000031861342,0.0002434513,0.00037671032,0.00045185362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017737682,0.00011688473,0.00017824679,0.00006783906,0.0008946156,0.0003188722,0.00029468373,0.00017366087,0.00021083062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012088873,0.000085980355,0.000064090535,0.0003400481,0.001778969,0.00018317731,0.00003763272,0.00051663304,0.00021063906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045741886,0.00005744429,0.08009502,0.000004550483,0.000009086195,0.000004323791,0.0003047166,8.485493e-8,0.000076817894,0.91244245,0.006021403,0.0009795448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019866986,0.0002978784,0.3474101,0.000026230144,0.000014498139,0.0000012184532,0.0009926963,0.00085873256,0.000019058869,0.6424486,0.0075888652,0.00014344294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5742035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4112537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2699938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030457223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024913703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.688075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047661309","doi":"10.1177/1065912908314713","title":"The Political Resocialization of Immigrants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resocialization; Political socialization; Immigration; Politics; Socialization; Biology and political orientation; Adaptation (eye); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Psychology; American political science; Law","score_opus":0.19842220577751904,"score_gpt":0.489765840549163,"score_spread":0.29134363477164393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047661309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8085927,0.00013349082,0.00028318047,0.055310946,0.0002938997,0.0006750607,0.000022400764,0.00008347824,0.13460487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.0000062939785,0.000015857493,0.00013286479,0.00066851603,0.000041138555,0.0000028388943,0.000011142875,0.001662804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939204,0.0019220413,0.00041985718,0.00018781448,0.0015481592,0.0020017514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531466,0.002834397,0.000038081092,0.00024641491,0.0007796226,0.0007868156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022906465,0.000083132014,0.00017262522,0.000090129215,0.001768352,0.00007090474,0.00032943758,0.00013998241,0.00007285737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035445525,0.000061308165,0.00009069068,0.0005122287,0.0029492409,0.0001380757,0.000019177278,0.00029834046,0.00016451931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020191801,0.000059357346,0.0071181203,0.000009236332,0.000007285156,0.000003912318,0.001822432,2.7247514e-8,0.00013048995,0.9887579,0.0014697203,0.00060133537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042462497,0.0009768292,0.0652016,0.000051546715,0.000012064525,0.0000047717353,0.0144087225,0.000098019205,0.0010214202,0.87522143,0.042343732,0.0002352097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08981132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008944096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18886587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028278283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006545881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048937976","doi":"10.1177/1065912907304502","title":"Economic Voting and Political Sophistication in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Sophistication; Presidential system; Voting behavior; Politics; Political science; Disapproval voting; Economics; Ranked voting system; Political economy; Public economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.14031627673591024,"score_gpt":0.48789803429886447,"score_spread":0.34758175756295423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048937976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93638265,0.000017955868,0.000405784,0.037634186,0.00005900193,0.00033568218,0.0000076279507,0.000028797485,0.025128327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987416,0.0000010850202,0.0000269225,0.00052065984,0.0005583064,0.000023973802,0.000013094073,0.000007939468,0.00010639227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957661,0.0011909957,0.00034406374,0.0002166431,0.0005630835,0.0019191384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422187,0.004848061,0.000020381714,0.0001420629,0.00014122808,0.00062642555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007443625,0.00008162794,0.00012087029,0.00025123404,0.0004577526,0.0002077675,0.00020991439,0.000106915904,0.00004978052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013537793,0.00006389363,0.00002706479,0.00034885126,0.0009827262,0.00013315363,0.000014132311,0.0003953768,0.0001314967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014866782,0.000038621696,0.011402561,0.000011297985,0.0000022244967,0.000006271794,0.003095845,2.663409e-7,0.000011228711,0.9847766,0.00011008262,0.0005300927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036031092,0.0007175779,0.16070247,0.0000459132,0.0000089341165,0.000004837567,0.033367023,0.0019542584,0.00004314605,0.7889727,0.01359879,0.00022404146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13217829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027099403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19580394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005054196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017209118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079411133","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500401","title":"When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democracy; Elite; Craft; Political science; Politics; Ideology; Political economy; Work (physics); Public administration; Control (management); Direct democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.36598341056832023,"score_gpt":0.4934216830183262,"score_spread":0.12743827245000594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079411133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11092188,0.00026635692,0.0012767855,0.16118191,0.0005751254,0.004011253,0.0002530851,0.0002354469,0.72127813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938682,0.0000065386903,0.00015247773,0.0002740119,0.0009135989,0.0008021743,0.00001514307,0.000013146194,0.003954707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961806,0.0005588702,0.0003694307,0.00030033363,0.0007997658,0.0017910171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675214,0.0019410858,0.000025232383,0.00021555522,0.0003420577,0.0007239255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018579587,0.00010819699,0.00019754117,0.00040499683,0.0010141631,0.00017846409,0.00026541113,0.00015458699,0.00084788864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023416555,0.00010314305,0.000091633534,0.0006766492,0.0006085511,0.0004835989,0.000016246897,0.00029471455,0.00054376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006149459,0.0001673539,0.0049818573,0.000025125319,0.000006045357,0.0000043101545,0.0037388986,1.0185246e-7,0.000024114717,0.98541087,0.0020202769,0.0036148822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063641573,0.0006855209,0.022738317,0.00010635042,0.000014349959,0.0000012494222,0.0009280209,0.00096621056,0.000038406284,0.6328219,0.34075013,0.0003131205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03295179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10374832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049723487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025071192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97348785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088244397","doi":"10.1177/106591290105400309","title":"Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: A Cross-National Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of scientific knowledge; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.09078999668256828,"score_gpt":0.43023590698574615,"score_spread":0.3394459103031779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088244397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620701,0.00013530396,0.0003231111,0.0035130153,0.000041148447,0.00028468235,0.000012466771,0.000019518553,0.03360062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501306,0.000010901493,0.0001321627,0.00013918239,0.00004717115,0.00007797942,0.0000133365775,0.000009143145,0.004557038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965346,0.00041719477,0.00024607172,0.0006132883,0.0012809534,0.00090792857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848306,0.0005103397,0.00002225651,0.00042922466,0.0000379674,0.00051713013],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026855106,0.00013387694,0.00013407879,0.00014303226,0.00080172543,0.00039661676,0.0004001927,0.000066083674,0.0060068215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027188158,0.00009835669,0.00010066493,0.0007618692,0.0043496075,0.0002674529,0.0002219529,0.00033328915,0.0016017554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001689164,0.0006994464,0.95177835,0.000016784332,0.00006526456,0.000005370234,0.0046374556,0.00004996538,0.00022589092,0.036310785,0.0008871844,0.0053066043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014272724,0.000087418404,0.94324845,0.0000010537863,0.000020316442,0.000004838194,0.001808489,0.0011040771,0.00002596554,0.03277335,0.020669099,0.0001142445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003911238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000945197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032942954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008077325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073643954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089831780","doi":"10.1177/1065912911411099","title":"Politics in Peer Groups","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reciprocal; Social capital; Bridging (networking); Diversity (politics); Political science; Interpersonal ties; Panel survey; Political economy; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.22393472110129745,"score_gpt":0.45298264830814694,"score_spread":0.2290479272068495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089831780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4403357,0.000055253946,0.000019566689,0.004868612,0.00018068166,0.00019645703,0.000005097118,0.000053061216,0.5542856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408305,0.000007124267,0.00007968022,0.00024440928,0.0009443912,0.0000371479,0.0000022434122,0.000013311771,0.0045886217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521375,0.0008597658,0.00021759975,0.00024558385,0.0013806138,0.0020827046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978453,0.0007562436,0.000012942949,0.00018241604,0.0004103919,0.00079269806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030435578,0.00008912977,0.00015020196,0.00018726084,0.00042515676,0.00008972216,0.00040501534,0.0001952652,0.0009587054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001224145,0.000086604254,0.00006933895,0.0005600647,0.001320911,0.0002094302,0.000036031022,0.00063535175,0.000702163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107764035,0.000117395066,0.0028746598,0.000004052877,0.000003083591,0.00003371405,0.06312659,3.0397362e-9,0.0000029806627,0.9303209,0.0012922342,0.0022136099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018311958,0.00034094436,0.03824505,0.0000140267375,0.0000019892525,6.7310094e-7,0.08126729,0.000010658933,0.000013133073,0.8697215,0.010070967,0.00013065802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034403667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056248633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5537474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033051043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033456518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097338549","doi":"10.1177/106591290205500204","title":"Evangelicalism Meets the Continental Divide: Mloral and Economic Conservatism in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Protestantism; Exceptionalism; Politics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Fundamentalism; Anti-Americanism; Sociology; Political economy; Positive economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09077587072037419,"score_gpt":0.40142498267280813,"score_spread":0.31064911195243394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097338549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7185521,0.0001023263,0.0000010590452,0.27646247,0.00004983569,0.00017333303,0.00002537716,0.0000065621653,0.0046269456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947804,0.00034228197,0.000003659136,0.004283588,0.000100433754,0.000031724114,0.0000051978163,0.000004220575,0.00044844954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768865,0.0009869689,0.0001580863,0.00014530958,0.00041922566,0.00060176646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595416,0.0035961575,0.000014797173,0.00012297768,0.000065493274,0.00024639265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011969887,0.00006561187,0.00009085758,0.00004646599,0.0006606868,0.0003105317,0.00021726787,0.000048769496,0.00014384059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039068869,0.000041154366,0.000022453605,0.00013333677,0.0011795806,0.00010148162,0.000021791502,0.0003968947,0.000022597407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006174569,0.000037645215,0.009540776,0.0000056574004,0.000015109403,0.00001799647,0.036507946,2.48939e-7,0.000004703179,0.8012679,0.15129402,0.0013018156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047619105,0.00018305444,0.04382869,0.000024446717,0.000007479269,0.000012756023,0.17038095,0.0028887861,0.0000029338767,0.042781547,0.7392582,0.00015496773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92869896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019714143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001471065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50815356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104194603","doi":"10.1177/1065912913510609","title":"Emerging Powers in the Climate Negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Political science; Political economy; Emerging markets; Identity (music); Development economics; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07136422016343524,"score_gpt":0.4553042924580914,"score_spread":0.38394007229465615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104194603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23396264,0.000010206291,0.00002281549,0.17449994,0.00011598386,0.00031535784,0.0000025717334,0.000021749403,0.5910487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800456,0.000005924269,0.00006566195,0.00068128743,0.00017979878,0.000081807615,0.0000035180485,0.0000038351745,0.00097361894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973234,0.0005362594,0.0001450788,0.00011740047,0.00093411165,0.00094376365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863565,0.0009005089,0.000009789814,0.00009241466,0.00021822818,0.00014341497],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021154466,0.000044063912,0.00005028613,0.00015695239,0.000493683,0.0002834063,0.00038022548,0.00003746579,0.0011975453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006130768,0.000032191645,0.00002969738,0.0003513894,0.0002950441,0.0002906774,0.000016653823,0.00026843708,0.0017918539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011103051,0.000028495626,0.002081777,0.0000017145455,0.0000018128652,0.0000028119102,0.015038245,4.4920625e-8,0.000014727364,0.97825676,0.0028851898,0.0016873219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019382912,0.00011757623,0.17628017,0.000023629735,0.0000013246912,8.008616e-7,0.14116253,0.00018310816,0.000010456419,0.63646096,0.04543315,0.00013249372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008574896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017437498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7640419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014322154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016064651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108005226","doi":"10.1177/1065912908320663","title":"Relative Extremism and Relative Moderation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.2474749647686408,"score_gpt":0.47677753183022614,"score_spread":0.22930256706158533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108005226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7493617,0.000121422556,0.0028171039,0.021503573,0.000088097746,0.0005274405,0.000008928669,0.00009002518,0.22548169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931139,0.0000059899667,0.00015312599,0.000091613736,0.00039431403,0.00004909622,0.000003356013,0.000009666418,0.0061789528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962146,0.001355043,0.00023513452,0.00026259728,0.0008516775,0.0010809439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708784,0.0016090724,0.00002303976,0.00013235198,0.0003959256,0.00075177633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013799667,0.00008813263,0.00014665804,0.00010798225,0.0012821835,0.0000836883,0.00009352778,0.00015436605,0.00013167714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001633939,0.00008048928,0.000039087292,0.00026850574,0.0013439604,0.0006493491,0.000014271247,0.0004301257,0.00022146871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012069646,0.00003532844,0.002315137,0.0000054428856,0.000007300677,0.000010067492,0.010679604,8.8567155e-8,0.00012278203,0.985728,0.00041642372,0.0006677499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892525,0.0006254412,0.022020433,0.000033374075,0.0000069001185,0.000005953469,0.002126813,0.0006457346,0.00009518959,0.967292,0.006681378,0.00017751254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016658649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013775298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24375217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027364312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029512524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128384648","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349631","title":"Informal Influences in Selecting Female Political Candidates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Proposition; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Public administration; Composition (language); Local election; Law","score_opus":0.09907213906656631,"score_gpt":0.47410724886507927,"score_spread":0.37503510979851296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128384648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7125057,0.00002252584,0.000024167073,0.009224248,0.00006365484,0.00022963849,0.000004550813,0.000047201116,0.27787828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800694,0.0000034513907,0.00010601828,0.0005399227,0.00046336013,0.000018574108,0.0000052903997,0.0000071194,0.00084929855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945383,0.0006419503,0.00037582437,0.0002902871,0.0012326406,0.0029209955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976087,0.00087237405,0.000024468003,0.0001876101,0.00031160013,0.0009951977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022461119,0.00011767615,0.00018001413,0.00040905958,0.00058816595,0.00035012755,0.00035444056,0.00015866382,0.00010811502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015863309,0.00010959282,0.000060296687,0.0006932683,0.0007019851,0.00045440454,0.000023696926,0.0006143864,0.00017895884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121289495,0.000064756954,0.026468774,0.000008484016,0.0000035711078,0.000018821967,0.010009886,9.148333e-7,0.00009243914,0.9599219,0.00008654909,0.0033118029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000556099,0.0009928535,0.32357034,0.000054389417,0.000005703478,0.0000073878186,0.10498285,0.00047704976,0.00065065915,0.56472844,0.0036410987,0.00033309992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0333248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004086865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3951934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045055692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010346859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97311234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130308920","doi":"10.1177/1065912915580627","title":"Minorities in the Middle East","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Middle East; Democratization; Middle class; Ethnic group; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Psychological resilience; Islam; Secularism; Political economy; Sociology; Development economics; Democracy; Gender studies; Politics; Social psychology; History; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.4291201391669498,"score_gpt":0.4644150513692397,"score_spread":0.03529491220228992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130308920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24782649,0.00014208502,0.000013476287,0.037049368,0.00011129341,0.00021948901,0.000013368246,0.000027154701,0.7145973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910362,0.0000020484167,0.000023239922,0.00091041025,0.00070748763,0.00004802326,0.0000011473787,0.000005925834,0.0072655333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949271,0.001310901,0.00017796602,0.00018300289,0.0016961165,0.0017048811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974774,0.0012755097,0.000011048723,0.00025024437,0.0002662452,0.0007195292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004342405,0.000076306016,0.00011782354,0.0000901446,0.00026661216,0.00024824904,0.00067288073,0.00008850122,0.000084408995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003206114,0.000055647903,0.00004583518,0.00042437253,0.0014962759,0.00021523476,0.000025528769,0.000493077,0.00060267426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010766788,0.00006295504,0.0009310051,0.0000050655667,0.0000013654402,0.000023969345,0.046401672,9.423323e-9,0.0000017546557,0.949356,0.0022937031,0.00091172766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873933,0.00033192764,0.0064746905,0.000023381652,0.000001762617,0.0000020481646,0.20952663,0.000017597036,0.000005160757,0.451712,0.33150747,0.00010993279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043123208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008205665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7432097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002732218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006772811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168513950","doi":"10.1177/1065912911421014","title":"Governing “Democratic” Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meritocracy; Mill; Governmentality; Democracy; Inequality; Liberalism; Democratic theory; Political science; Sociology; Underclass; Individualism; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.39577324407980097,"score_gpt":0.5075148953185098,"score_spread":0.11174165123870883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168513950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09655228,0.00002425348,0.0005955501,0.0014502709,0.00010990293,0.00018406392,0.000016735565,0.00010955231,0.9009574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362224,0.000003733911,0.00033071,0.0005928594,0.00040424452,0.00002993596,0.0000011688252,0.000011417417,0.0050036605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932375,0.0025034093,0.0003024614,0.000324643,0.0012705363,0.002361466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960439,0.0018154611,0.000023917482,0.00036184283,0.00033434047,0.0014205246],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006464027,0.00011037675,0.00017695507,0.00009226033,0.00091903354,0.000120402445,0.0006229755,0.00014899838,0.002643251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004844755,0.00010222866,0.000088835775,0.00036734488,0.0028008283,0.00047713102,0.000052537605,0.00063260325,0.0027897854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002505069,0.000100198995,0.0006843162,0.000010898132,0.000007019401,0.000014185399,0.009065659,4.1119352e-9,0.00006295303,0.98651236,0.00037153883,0.0031457944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011208938,0.00037023352,0.0047044386,0.000025557549,0.0000037419159,0.0000010557193,0.010019222,0.00001239541,0.0003670234,0.9690062,0.0152316615,0.00014641105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011034277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018125938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002857195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046252162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2347107049","doi":"10.1177/1065912916640900","title":"Political Socialization and Voting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Socialization; Turnout; Voting; Educational attainment; European Social Survey; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Voting behavior; Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.2370657947104446,"score_gpt":0.5209200335860047,"score_spread":0.2838542388755601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347107049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29622835,0.000071339906,0.0027422868,0.49950182,0.00039607572,0.00027300653,0.00003718834,0.000087610664,0.20066234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936275,0.0000036333972,0.00010288417,0.00050817564,0.0015534604,0.000030008903,0.0000024204746,0.0000060016873,0.0041659283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727446,0.0006199002,0.0001748039,0.00019294355,0.000730633,0.0010072802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707836,0.0017926178,0.000011987691,0.00006046741,0.00060245243,0.00045410884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017005671,0.000060220264,0.00008792949,0.00008789663,0.00092375523,0.00010686715,0.00010569653,0.00006645473,0.00021846013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032229496,0.000042684693,0.00003071345,0.00013652124,0.0011057458,0.00019166153,0.000024793493,0.000098289,0.00016873011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049030646,0.000034239212,0.0036538392,0.000005350677,0.0000071395652,6.990722e-7,0.0023017903,1.8592264e-9,0.00014961786,0.9894699,0.0020068542,0.0023656902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014821165,0.0001533909,0.019095432,0.00003441017,0.0000036941824,9.85965e-7,0.016501185,0.0000118207745,0.00011506194,0.93870705,0.02510631,0.0001224349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023793345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007781831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69739914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028761115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003358298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7104872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620762129","doi":"10.1177/1065912917709354","title":"When the “Laws of Fear” Do Not Apply: Effective Counterterrorism and the Sense of Security from Terrorism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Purdue University","keywords":"Terrorism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Law and economics; Criminology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.044795252073460995,"score_gpt":0.4084869752611737,"score_spread":0.3636917231877127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620762129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95713633,0.0002544055,0.00015436922,0.029435936,0.00046777775,0.0013324423,0.00028702675,0.000031184598,0.010900519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983395,0.000054041222,0.000011459856,0.00038575614,0.0008325712,0.0001424417,0.0000032642233,0.000025200894,0.00020578735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197316,0.0032064586,0.0006426243,0.0005711843,0.0020420875,0.0015644673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890686,0.007862505,0.00026231096,0.0015325709,0.0006719,0.0006021044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065611703,0.0002825258,0.0006740794,0.00011255347,0.0017355205,0.000488675,0.0016483902,0.0002947432,0.00013891992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030192295,0.00016933036,0.0002563898,0.00012187049,0.014165601,0.0004274697,0.00028788068,0.0011264943,0.000054915017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009251052,0.0002505478,0.0024696141,0.00011105039,0.00018410734,0.00003633259,0.4942316,3.5040916e-8,0.000307754,0.47966006,0.0012206712,0.0206031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027754365,0.0009228695,0.03538946,0.00036205235,0.00011709967,0.0000073077185,0.40702593,0.00041550692,0.00076231855,0.5475897,0.00424659,0.0003857218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102584355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003027475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099556886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015582584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030350563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733328125","doi":"10.1177/1065912917717818","title":"Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a Liberal Right of Secession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political philosophy; Frame (networking); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.17369954166981158,"score_gpt":0.4960589075875838,"score_spread":0.32235936591777226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733328125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28831178,0.000039292863,0.000012148158,0.055378344,0.00011946744,0.00018066345,0.000027689573,0.00002829873,0.6559023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713314,0.000015824255,0.000057573394,0.00026807075,0.00065716926,0.0000109172715,0.0000011535608,0.000009901425,0.0018462592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996214,0.0007732429,0.00021454896,0.00028868715,0.0012646735,0.0012448932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962153,0.0020072036,0.000041713854,0.0004750991,0.00028840316,0.000972297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428162,0.0001063857,0.00021160777,0.00012366533,0.0018416453,0.00031016418,0.00057752227,0.00023431714,0.00011709548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036962111,0.00008450674,0.00006695591,0.00008135714,0.0048595695,0.0003184604,0.000083730025,0.0007534954,0.00009263778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047522753,0.00010694962,0.00045318206,0.00003640438,0.0000070302567,0.000017803473,0.002398005,5.3797904e-9,0.000083580955,0.99386185,0.00059823954,0.0023894084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508277,0.0007830515,0.009595189,0.00011148531,0.000004767779,8.5373057e-7,0.0011276319,0.000020229292,0.0005781875,0.97868156,0.008738571,0.000107642874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046224054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045192507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70882136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008821568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032673992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752243049","doi":"10.1177/1065912917727370","title":"Race and the Meso-Level Sources of Domination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Oppression; Race (biology); Sociology; Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Racism; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24364697679629982,"score_gpt":0.4943446241393689,"score_spread":0.2506976473430691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752243049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23568048,0.00013583843,0.00014094276,0.27913874,0.00012031494,0.00035699114,0.00002690826,0.000019613346,0.48438016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786025,0.000023731889,0.000051807547,0.00017000864,0.00045217384,0.000015397645,3.9606175e-7,0.000005024464,0.0014212014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967431,0.0011311566,0.00017755503,0.00016074604,0.0010064688,0.0007809962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940223,0.0047987276,0.000045108227,0.00036853694,0.00037587713,0.0003894699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070125083,0.000061955165,0.00016638184,0.000058916186,0.0020784785,0.00030924703,0.00060053985,0.00012470201,0.00004352104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012599737,0.000041439514,0.00005672629,0.000061036204,0.012025327,0.00025120686,0.00007260968,0.00047143345,0.000038055096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005239749,0.000025950954,0.00022190942,0.000016536229,0.000007648377,0.0000018994358,0.007974938,6.4824253e-9,0.000012526297,0.98771614,0.000115314964,0.003854719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005334456,0.00011068688,0.009712259,0.00002128312,0.000006936643,6.647127e-7,0.005846449,0.000046338417,0.000113351045,0.980609,0.0029468513,0.00005274173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013907995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006437484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7621798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050250714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023674841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794532306","doi":"10.1177/1065912918761009","title":"Political Gender Stereotypes in a List-PR System with a High Share of Women MPs: Competent Men versus Leftist Women?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Left-wing politics; Ideology; System justification; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Parliament; Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Competence (human resources); Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.10640559922372476,"score_gpt":0.4104760657507457,"score_spread":0.3040704665270209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794532306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213103,0.000014377262,0.00006809832,0.0017985328,0.00015970042,0.0005271189,0.00008601716,0.00005162531,0.17598426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998486,9.178955e-7,0.00009204076,0.00005333042,0.000588334,0.0001789314,0.000011115929,0.000026261447,0.00056310033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924448,0.0012056386,0.0004705931,0.0004936148,0.0018280372,0.0035573246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614817,0.00095364486,0.000056031702,0.00042532478,0.0008289478,0.0015878831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022789536,0.00018481085,0.00039649947,0.00038558958,0.0003823834,0.0002073151,0.0005039946,0.00016218895,0.0004300314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890943,0.00015395727,0.000056066732,0.0005465821,0.0021661862,0.00019242881,0.000082395,0.00039674097,0.00014002496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034206774,0.00019684495,0.0018903353,0.00015560204,0.000056146837,0.00003645444,0.034887664,1.2966527e-7,0.000052242638,0.9621114,0.00013194692,0.00013917172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033053674,0.005494032,0.032614734,0.00017331397,0.00001573831,0.0000079597685,0.8810857,0.00037315185,0.0002452013,0.07467449,0.0015941688,0.0004161602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035271313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033582198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8874369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034434835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011127545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800115565","doi":"10.1177/1065912918768031","title":"Beneficence, Street Begging, and Diverted Giving Schemes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Compromise; Law and economics; Normative; Donation; Political science; Law; Population; Element (criminal law); Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.16696312524705134,"score_gpt":0.5368734931876278,"score_spread":0.3699103679405764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800115565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95879835,0.0001026601,0.00008881209,0.001339992,0.00015289406,0.00032404048,0.00003209101,0.00009503384,0.039066117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748343,0.000014379976,0.00011477716,0.0001357284,0.0010781322,0.000071953335,0.0000060070856,0.000022155557,0.0010734088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605364,0.0008092382,0.00031086607,0.00034461578,0.0006639202,0.0018177408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996706,0.0015868085,0.00003191174,0.0002771014,0.00069599185,0.0007021558],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014013521,0.00012688107,0.00030407478,0.00017760886,0.0018116732,0.00006109486,0.00024023223,0.00020645223,0.0010059973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008521126,0.000107737935,0.00003461861,0.00029867454,0.0008976184,0.00018863483,0.00014202036,0.00083665445,0.00069648173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022303206,0.000060101116,0.1518438,0.00015075914,0.000017702372,0.000009164653,0.017663892,1.1107318e-9,0.0001685097,0.8153663,0.00029267027,0.01440476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013269344,0.0021518534,0.36960462,0.00066813314,0.000017764858,3.2276336e-7,0.43809015,0.0004299365,0.00027372508,0.14780745,0.039123416,0.0005056947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006111401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065098354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013395249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025419003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805677146","doi":"10.1177/1065912918775252","title":"Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Accountability; Politics; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Preference; Political economy; Social psychology; Public administration; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05567274590710162,"score_gpt":0.4787482996375129,"score_spread":0.4230755537304113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805677146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99268883,0.00003532942,0.0012495295,0.0004954921,0.000049419745,0.0010492393,0.000018205435,0.00011118154,0.0043027946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988462,8.518632e-7,0.000076488446,0.000094018265,0.000672095,0.00017199287,0.0000057199486,0.00003102632,0.00010162903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055654,0.0048245066,0.00034500164,0.0006871905,0.001412904,0.002173839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955691,0.002140991,0.00006864519,0.00037569107,0.00051644485,0.0013291084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022811892,0.00020783342,0.00034387608,0.00015036583,0.0014502445,0.00043554782,0.00029250522,0.00009467747,0.00006770903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008760529,0.00017537268,0.00003482428,0.00068218034,0.0056789904,0.0004917787,0.00004565927,0.00055193657,0.000048089638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042448842,0.0031197073,0.5913166,0.000050326555,0.00010958816,0.000025146377,0.08858262,8.645672e-8,0.003376608,0.30359125,0.00024174272,0.009161867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002078869,0.085707545,0.33553183,0.00013619903,0.000096832984,0.0000065925115,0.54126716,0.0009633555,0.0056754886,0.026553703,0.0009895838,0.0009928235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39404508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048184846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45268455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052342867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026074512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810349191","doi":"10.1177/1065912918784209","title":"<i>TRENDS:</i> Police Militarization and the Use of Lethal Force","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Suspect; Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Political science; Poison control; Geography; Law; Psychology; Politics; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.2495762502331529,"score_gpt":0.4923058386755124,"score_spread":0.2427295884423595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810349191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051517,0.00002192104,0.0007541486,0.053667895,0.00013844078,0.0003150555,0.000047871257,0.000044230637,0.13985872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385846,0.000016136328,0.00022942908,0.00043414446,0.00058108923,0.0000113436445,0.000002107393,0.000006244991,0.0048610293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971133,0.0012914425,0.00016850911,0.0001492516,0.00060444593,0.000673048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955885,0.0035069175,0.000027235066,0.00021636336,0.00037858935,0.00028243446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020648635,0.000056365992,0.00010716938,0.00013299639,0.0008152486,0.00014974766,0.00018951175,0.00007298415,0.000217994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011411953,0.0000398674,0.000043815126,0.00042893353,0.0048034936,0.0003826508,0.000031816628,0.0002272049,0.000055185836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064885215,0.000029543788,0.0003849277,0.000005533961,0.0000073739775,1.6010598e-7,0.089236386,7.5495066e-8,0.00012878198,0.8995703,0.0012695158,0.009302539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028340842,0.0029805505,0.071751386,0.000118777374,0.000095049036,0.000014974073,0.12259577,0.0026397577,0.00018720466,0.26039279,0.53586984,0.000519838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5050331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05339526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004720324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013637278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2842535635","doi":"10.1177/1065912918786040","title":"Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Cash; Public relations; Social psychology; Control (management); Political science; Psychology; Personality; Gender gap; Demographic economics; Business; Economics; Law; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.13145612914317306,"score_gpt":0.4539914673465095,"score_spread":0.32253533820333646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2842535635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8229038,0.00005632406,0.00055559445,0.115134545,0.0001395525,0.0014639993,0.00016163972,0.000058296857,0.05952622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475956,0.000004923392,0.0001597268,0.0018937332,0.0008386822,0.00018146633,0.000004135842,0.000025585754,0.002132162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994612,0.0006733267,0.00033412952,0.00054463156,0.0011168631,0.0027190594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380046,0.0032036128,0.000031827887,0.00031826505,0.0006757606,0.0019700953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034109668,0.00018835632,0.00028733924,0.00022497239,0.0019481684,0.0007583011,0.00031109186,0.0001586567,0.000085304884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024565177,0.0001438725,0.000052608615,0.000295533,0.0031126398,0.00013057746,0.000090810034,0.00044082777,0.000015582229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054730466,0.000039021445,0.0010128991,0.000040370913,0.000032593118,0.000010294791,0.0670908,8.185843e-8,0.00018995268,0.92411494,0.006148131,0.0012661649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010766133,0.0020119029,0.019015824,0.00008685859,0.0000371999,0.000025081836,0.41886148,0.00081854756,0.00038155445,0.52807766,0.029120788,0.0004864868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008180983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013724428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39603728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031710943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070782495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889819521","doi":"10.1177/1065912918796326","title":"The Influence of Cause and Sectional Group Lobbying on Government Responsiveness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Incentive; Interest group; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Set (abstract data type); Politics; Work (physics); Public policy; Special Interest Group; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.07763246343692679,"score_gpt":0.3575061416990297,"score_spread":0.27987367826210297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889819521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770535,0.000012743359,0.000015848907,0.0019204789,0.0000654651,0.00014857936,0.0000072264115,0.000022234186,0.020753901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830025,0.0000024603887,0.000007672267,0.00081224926,0.00069759134,0.000029388839,0.0000011033356,0.000010328897,0.00013895148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975763,0.00007882986,0.00025663627,0.00025209828,0.0010060753,0.00083004916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980319,0.0010577076,0.000050171097,0.00026755128,0.00052135,0.00007132938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846831,0.000115058676,0.00012048694,0.00009140787,0.0005525313,0.00040706675,0.0002665838,0.000057254187,0.000028102311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008476248,0.000079105266,0.000034671943,0.00030545873,0.0017303182,0.0005360357,0.000093134,0.00027027997,0.00020747328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022781175,0.00004215881,0.0045228777,0.000041893472,0.000013204438,0.000008910639,0.000026954558,8.017296e-7,0.0016413383,0.9922467,0.00012616256,0.0011012087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027750793,0.0006936425,0.47625998,0.00009349427,0.000009490842,0.000004136425,0.0018164007,0.00023978655,0.0004138573,0.5134499,0.006587743,0.00015407173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00098754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012522317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4787968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078090394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064169275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63754296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889870292","doi":"10.1177/1065912918798489","title":"Receiving Foreign Aid Can Reduce Support for Incumbent Presidents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Aid effectiveness; Test (biology); Politics; Accountability; Public economics; Mechanism (biology); Business; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country; Law","score_opus":0.13307506108103664,"score_gpt":0.482618859026625,"score_spread":0.3495437979455883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889870292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1884324,0.0000059307235,0.00041371834,0.020016085,0.00052092754,0.00088665687,0.00004575899,0.00008060359,0.7895979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686687,0.0000023212285,0.00068214664,0.00028511632,0.0016723636,0.00012900229,0.000016779984,0.000015026422,0.028528545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640346,0.00028592165,0.0002482467,0.0003009456,0.0013310282,0.0014303729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974917,0.00078036374,0.00002704556,0.0001532494,0.001030126,0.000517512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026935078,0.00009100565,0.00011742621,0.00017819615,0.0008885177,0.00025342425,0.0005055549,0.00009307032,0.0010469622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001962445,0.000088017005,0.00006537125,0.0002115145,0.0008009911,0.00023017128,0.000045265504,0.00019781743,0.00040488728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004071732,0.000044410557,0.0014102735,0.000010699983,0.000013897912,0.000003823431,0.004654706,5.719919e-9,0.00012686141,0.9764866,0.013771449,0.00343656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005305965,0.0013357572,0.013691132,0.000070978036,0.000005937659,0.0000019181323,0.008586665,0.00005666409,0.0021671238,0.8309644,0.14234562,0.00024322476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004920411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029149363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7802363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045989588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096580194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954655822","doi":"10.1177/1065912919847293","title":"Intersectionality, Linked Fate, and LGBTQ Latinx Political Participation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Transgender; Intersectionality; Politics; Feeling; Gender studies; Sociology; Minority group; Identification (biology); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Ethnic group; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.1643047173249085,"score_gpt":0.4968359847713774,"score_spread":0.3325312674464689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954655822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8785262,0.000015541982,0.00011040954,0.0182557,0.00022941692,0.0005235322,0.000014982712,0.000087003675,0.10223719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963915,7.2973364e-7,0.000042805317,0.00036532496,0.0007372916,0.0000787131,0.000010263304,0.000016896129,0.0023565236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433666,0.0015369708,0.00040847535,0.00039445175,0.0011605783,0.0021628465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600434,0.001838053,0.000031749663,0.00024125002,0.0004913204,0.0013932678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024126717,0.00013396208,0.00023670607,0.00016870613,0.0004501704,0.00028747268,0.00018023167,0.00021345049,0.00076539844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013827459,0.00012511697,0.00007050632,0.0003613661,0.00085804285,0.00035032028,0.000042460775,0.0005074761,0.0011648628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024169889,0.00008723128,0.043739486,0.00003978786,0.000011479356,0.000002359284,0.0013919733,1.1784646e-7,0.00030358648,0.95314837,0.00022424347,0.0010272256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061513315,0.0014124317,0.21323442,0.000089090325,0.000016917524,0.000003036801,0.0057857516,0.0005721317,0.00015319367,0.76457083,0.0132086035,0.00033846806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033120442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035147362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18857752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042481217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028887865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980111277","doi":"10.1177/1065912919879764","title":"Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than Their Male Colleagues?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Dove; Political science; Ideology; House of Representatives; Political economy; Roll call; Dimension (graph theory); Politics; Public administration; Law; Voting; Sociology","score_opus":0.11378162908741503,"score_gpt":0.4303996830704761,"score_spread":0.3166180539830611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980111277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7331191,0.00006523305,0.000010732441,0.0020494694,0.000083815095,0.0004906858,0.00007642901,0.000019763595,0.2640848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99289685,0.000019023393,0.00004815584,0.0001276652,0.00030392277,0.000025312376,0.000007867557,0.000018762104,0.0065524243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633986,0.00061783293,0.0002745785,0.00036554923,0.0010841745,0.0013179855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975191,0.00085999764,0.000065459615,0.00033761797,0.0005172754,0.00070055225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013447197,0.00013165428,0.00026954542,0.00028263812,0.00033093157,0.00015751617,0.00032068434,0.00016525992,0.0003409333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004300542,0.00011050072,0.0000936748,0.00037696722,0.0014426865,0.00018869806,0.00006775953,0.00028554586,0.000059861915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024401998,0.00007384718,0.05083659,0.00009434942,0.000034337663,0.000008073792,0.016181108,5.8119264e-7,0.00018616297,0.9316893,0.00053554116,0.0003356607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010665583,0.0005796144,0.13849415,0.00007744165,0.000015316571,0.00001156265,0.56275964,0.00042470917,0.0010115477,0.29161784,0.0036130524,0.00032856836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015746368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005239513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6400715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015510975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060804025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008660424","doi":"10.1177/1065912920906193","title":"Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Presidential system; Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2500075570869809,"score_gpt":0.4546764629392381,"score_spread":0.20466890585225717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008660424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713922,0.00021345599,0.000011931145,0.027481372,0.00003970468,0.00027936127,0.000044701534,0.0000098220235,0.0005274101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899286,0.000104651685,0.000018723927,0.00040768748,0.00021941577,0.000018561175,0.000007091851,0.000007184173,0.00022380591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739635,0.0007370326,0.00019327611,0.0002405207,0.0007086435,0.00072420115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974436,0.0017714866,0.000029085564,0.00017777292,0.00013452883,0.00044349377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006228698,0.00009152292,0.00012145892,0.000041811883,0.0005588177,0.00023576713,0.00030780153,0.00005491684,0.00013784136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032527553,0.000056282784,0.00003209133,0.00021083944,0.002057498,0.00014750168,0.000072333656,0.00027530908,0.00001490677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009398876,0.000103085426,0.23656012,0.0000847533,0.000057441037,0.000008168131,0.27969772,0.0000023378454,0.003842233,0.47789878,0.0011210014,0.0005303917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049568375,0.0014231226,0.44629148,0.00013834046,0.000033048407,0.0000030737115,0.53100616,0.002322483,0.005925041,0.011163007,0.00096599374,0.00023255996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061951067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003358151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46673578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050736442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008740543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94429547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036705317","doi":"10.1177/1065912920930822","title":"The Language of Legacies: The Politics of Evoking Dead Leaders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Courtesy; Charisma; Feeling; Natural experiment; Political science; Public opinion; Voting; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.21361875054650054,"score_gpt":0.48500977684716123,"score_spread":0.2713910263006607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036705317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8229672,0.00040054452,0.0001581394,0.14014418,0.000104259045,0.00050625857,0.000027229526,0.0000347351,0.035657477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847937,0.000002406399,0.000011793976,0.0002628719,0.00050980656,0.000017332,9.480965e-7,0.000008550724,0.0007069531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958514,0.0013112959,0.0003731855,0.00013817412,0.0011650566,0.0011609056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490005,0.0039751893,0.00005142954,0.00022700234,0.00039463406,0.00045172314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021599869,0.00007261402,0.00016501805,0.0000349694,0.00070639583,0.000087192515,0.0004971837,0.00007513909,0.00005194145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039033734,0.00004278132,0.00009311812,0.00043435962,0.002981136,0.00009748174,0.000027957718,0.00034895368,0.000044564247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001035757,0.000019118912,0.0010178027,0.00004040027,0.000012697321,0.0000011052766,0.033306736,2.5728397e-7,0.0007746389,0.9632352,0.0006887905,0.00089288043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005975484,0.0026744935,0.008451266,0.00016303934,0.00005086206,0.0000013553113,0.67611736,0.0008104444,0.008667259,0.23814106,0.063976064,0.00034924265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0366573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025012346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72509414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009030727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038598222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040042046","doi":"10.1177/1065912920938143","title":"Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":357,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disinformation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Democracy; Internet privacy; Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.19890531838338715,"score_gpt":0.5076986544846781,"score_spread":0.30879333610129095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040042046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19116858,0.000005769973,0.002740488,0.22273268,0.000051540814,0.00058202224,0.000014391103,0.000118305885,0.5825862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98873997,0.0000030658653,0.00025424073,0.0093848305,0.00032658596,0.0000080635355,0.000007450278,0.0000071299887,0.00126869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967617,0.00036199708,0.00026502137,0.00014717682,0.0013920898,0.0010720519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966363,0.0004913041,0.00002106792,0.00013701248,0.00048428102,0.0022300857],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011348721,0.00008724607,0.00012030374,0.0001355284,0.00075337704,0.0004919937,0.00030073206,0.000077030396,0.00124562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047641597,0.00007667292,0.000048163573,0.0006789498,0.0002595517,0.0011387616,0.000032481184,0.00030106344,0.009682252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453793,0.000015039224,0.000015820991,0.0000075410185,0.0000038842213,0.0000023012976,0.20579948,4.853002e-7,0.000021007338,0.76174325,0.011497589,0.020859074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009153039,0.0037086175,0.0045107245,0.000064375774,0.000008841118,0.0000040573377,0.5069756,0.0017877163,0.00071508926,0.26663223,0.21416256,0.0005148829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014854831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013931045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79757136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021140299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005870207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099907200","doi":"10.1177/1065912920971715","title":"From Generation to Generation: The Role of Grandparents in the Intergenerational Transmission of (Non-)Voting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Grandparent; Turnout; Voting; Socioeconomic status; Disadvantage; Demographic economics; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Demography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.24325716956423124,"score_gpt":0.47393896006769526,"score_spread":0.23068179050346402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099907200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88485116,0.00015916687,0.0035793155,0.1071286,0.00015516089,0.00042725715,0.00005298364,0.0000052997825,0.0036410864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958284,0.0000044988706,0.00039247854,0.0008512002,0.0027282701,0.00008201009,0.000048588663,0.0000045698644,0.0000599746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969386,0.0009918008,0.0004264256,0.00019609185,0.0011127812,0.000334315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846876,0.0006986663,0.0000396377,0.00010142671,0.0005407934,0.00015070214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016525048,0.00007450218,0.00013209254,0.00006536146,0.00046306642,0.00007015606,0.0003706953,0.00004789234,0.00016966593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007180081,0.00004740049,0.00006504864,0.0004046105,0.00024658567,0.00011796189,0.000020062904,0.00018700284,0.000019759427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000375606,0.00013897671,0.0011132044,0.000008025157,0.000019801253,3.979522e-7,0.1704076,0.000086005384,0.045631282,0.7732724,0.0056048315,0.0036799323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014620457,0.002904147,0.04050536,0.00021174255,0.00006244556,0.0000012947442,0.4633861,0.14025635,0.09901726,0.16968001,0.08171678,0.0007964683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077647483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021365746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6035924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006278968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031707692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121249697","doi":"10.1177/1065912909349627","title":"Rethinking Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subordination (linguistics); Harm; Pornography; Democracy; Political science; Reign; Law; Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.10214964596849722,"score_gpt":0.46109998245060135,"score_spread":0.3589503364821041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121249697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2571454,0.00024841234,0.000075179945,0.103298396,0.0001640461,0.00021166597,5.1674414e-7,0.0001911737,0.6386652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195766,0.000026690313,0.0002956059,0.00062523544,0.0007757147,0.0000034801485,0.0000015006877,0.0000073869965,0.0063067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583656,0.0008712424,0.00018094183,0.00024813987,0.0012422667,0.0016208334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978123,0.0009497484,0.000013735494,0.00022354294,0.0003023757,0.00069833925],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027586382,0.00007911167,0.00012503422,0.00016903142,0.0013069687,0.0002719245,0.00040186616,0.00020118906,0.0004593632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014038564,0.00006861487,0.000064746666,0.00054745073,0.0006821316,0.00019380996,0.000011785118,0.0007842642,0.0010216816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009405592,0.000058311183,0.00013663179,0.0000018618791,0.0000048253705,0.0000339547,0.042903062,4.1160714e-8,0.000058084926,0.92131996,0.0024615084,0.033012364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110872264,0.00040659722,0.0016839654,0.000032716216,0.000002960216,0.0000013986391,0.017386246,0.000023071172,0.0000595932,0.943057,0.037140008,0.00009559017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018562601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065950604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73481226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018336347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027800116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128006609","doi":"10.1177/1065912921990751","title":"Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Affect (linguistics); Persistence (discontinuity); Political science; Contingent vote; Survey data collection; Natural experiment; Political economy; Economics; Demographic economics; General election; Psychology; Politics; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.057386594031011845,"score_gpt":0.45014771094841693,"score_spread":0.3927611169174051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128006609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177331,0.00008768608,0.0001735617,0.15371281,0.00012685405,0.00058025215,0.000013024166,0.000018238467,0.027554495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682534,0.0000051712695,0.000016330376,0.0005501771,0.0005600126,0.00019894908,0.000002453923,0.00000848836,0.001833072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952252,0.0020980383,0.00025859984,0.00026482568,0.0008243395,0.0013289902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964619,0.0024793085,0.00001503685,0.00020045045,0.00028603894,0.0005572199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029470949,0.00008753531,0.0001702974,0.000077196135,0.0009978411,0.00030758537,0.00020843363,0.00007648145,0.000117647076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002462732,0.000055529148,0.000057248275,0.0009149683,0.0007149914,0.0001407232,0.000043166467,0.0005378309,0.00016049232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029975114,0.00006257596,0.011649306,0.000011159082,0.000006218886,0.000008567559,0.017316775,2.5777783e-7,0.000115918316,0.9683517,0.00063618587,0.0018113176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019862691,0.0011424867,0.5335944,0.00015057219,0.00003463424,0.000025760166,0.08397259,0.0024089068,0.00027379097,0.31905344,0.056843422,0.0005136877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08979129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40190405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6492983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020323203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045163542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91626984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167331783","doi":"10.1177/10659129211023590","title":"Are Political Attacks a Laughing Matter? Three Experiments on Political Humor and the Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam; Institute of Population and Public Health; Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Backlash; Political science; Advertising; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.11414942620372244,"score_gpt":0.4800217024457434,"score_spread":0.36587227624202096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167331783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85232127,0.00013728689,0.0003111626,0.010518287,0.00010982608,0.0007432002,0.000107288644,0.000032910604,0.13571876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979766,4.8132733e-7,0.00006754093,0.00081860466,0.0002463404,0.0006196152,0.0000060678103,0.00003601725,0.00022875844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934408,0.002709543,0.00042181008,0.00064114865,0.000707095,0.002079569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98557395,0.012669543,0.00005795134,0.00068410847,0.00033668545,0.0006777861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017955621,0.00023428626,0.00054419576,0.00011970936,0.00047050737,0.00010870109,0.0003060258,0.00012935833,0.00046779928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013221111,0.00016938621,0.0001510436,0.00031362937,0.002208037,0.000040284176,0.00017510743,0.0008275556,0.00036559458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043697222,0.0003760688,0.006742339,0.00008984206,0.00013515262,0.00008384658,0.0018390445,4.167522e-8,0.00035944468,0.9895827,0.00022351713,0.00013103372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004360626,0.00092110585,0.36441886,0.00041127793,0.000056583238,0.00007578289,0.12888448,0.000044915487,0.00547393,0.49476665,0.00023473811,0.00035104787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013832648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062510815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49481604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020818599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097055956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8135604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244645105","doi":"10.1177/1065912919870605","title":"Discursive Inequity and the Internal Exclusion of Women Speakers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Public sphere; Inequality; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05536214733259488,"score_gpt":0.42725721637905456,"score_spread":0.3718950690464597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244645105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038173,0.000024025032,0.000047840393,0.009298251,0.00010305077,0.00030934557,0.000004561411,0.000006392236,0.08638922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976974,0.0000097051125,0.000012892691,0.00007051523,0.00014961338,0.000013982873,9.286988e-7,0.0000045856123,0.0020403718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997065,0.00087218196,0.00016613115,0.00015963936,0.0008494933,0.0008875271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980708,0.0011437325,0.000027915909,0.00017260308,0.00021486559,0.0003700819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033951558,0.000052104857,0.0001362321,0.00008053469,0.00022797339,0.000103831226,0.00024283242,0.00004963248,0.00022151603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006693961,0.000032262808,0.000043697655,0.00014141873,0.0018132821,0.000104751845,0.00008441286,0.00023321262,0.000060926155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060551647,0.00002707974,0.003069885,0.000017783157,0.000010665985,0.0000010303069,0.060855642,8.613899e-8,0.00011458245,0.9342483,0.000071973154,0.0015224069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011380521,0.0004442535,0.02938946,0.000027459406,0.00000465347,0.0000013508792,0.26795146,0.00018536975,0.00010273781,0.6976784,0.0029966275,0.00008018514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016833108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023716319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23656994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002253789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020836142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249313361","doi":"10.2307/3088030","title":"Incentives to Membership in Canadian Political Parties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Politics; Political science; Public economics; Business; Public administration; Economics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.2540121165146782,"score_gpt":0.479088289027598,"score_spread":0.22507617251291978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249313361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5241823,0.00004370283,0.000007413768,0.12848504,0.00015628067,0.0005621797,0.00002043381,0.000053204836,0.34648943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497247,6.607732e-7,0.000021035255,0.0009226441,0.00058071746,0.00012318484,0.000002070755,0.000015022698,0.003362169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906714,0.0016299543,0.00035862255,0.00034520085,0.001056509,0.0059383223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258024,0.0009220452,0.000011250439,0.0002365143,0.0002807769,0.0059691905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868178,0.00012663021,0.0002156093,0.00050050614,0.0004991672,0.00025940934,0.0003336966,0.00017736519,0.0020113976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036483542,0.00012559115,0.000058105237,0.00086566166,0.000748065,0.0002483759,0.000019459501,0.00047614484,0.0025747924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060630614,0.00006955969,0.032840304,0.000011586349,0.0000042605125,0.000025571604,0.0052526556,1.2377726e-7,0.000013864116,0.9590972,0.0020851716,0.0005936182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000616401,0.0016238812,0.1230246,0.0002043439,0.0000129993705,0.0000035330365,0.025695503,0.0006205097,0.00021412838,0.62523794,0.2219252,0.0008209386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93053496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93420726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4707902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021059508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058840064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311630748","doi":"10.1177/10659129221143763","title":"Why the Public Supports the Human Rights of Prisoners and Asylum Seekers: An Experimental Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Public opinion; Rhetoric; International human rights law; Refugee; Norm (philosophy); Public policy; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07611823459119202,"score_gpt":0.41400479103840004,"score_spread":0.337886556447208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311630748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95266485,0.00009338061,0.000092471426,0.010059146,0.000072022696,0.0005906368,0.00001534441,0.000026659496,0.036385503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850225,9.2194614e-7,0.000034048477,0.00022114384,0.00019611447,0.0001745152,0.000025986279,0.000006978545,0.0008380594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995105,0.0023788542,0.00021573916,0.00023802706,0.0014032867,0.00065906567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.00029489558,0.00003849465,0.00028830813,0.00018094988,0.0002758424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00353714,0.000077889985,0.00010374416,0.00010253172,0.0034714832,0.00028713958,0.0004740398,0.000045785644,0.0006133851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001163274,0.000045918,0.000049401566,0.00030807575,0.0016040081,0.00037040352,0.000049504833,0.00040991924,0.0000037323784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065709914,0.00017459258,0.00023683289,0.0000032629175,0.0000075268476,8.6028507e-7,0.049831517,6.195379e-8,0.00042227574,0.9417625,0.007304503,0.0002494789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032944407,0.0024029831,0.0018938655,0.0000045874845,0.000009402031,0.000008278105,0.51690745,0.00049954496,0.0006927931,0.13108435,0.34597683,0.00019045766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016188717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006777688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8106782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017472138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002060386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363675809","doi":"10.1177/10659129231166679","title":"Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Presidential election; Surprise; Democracy; Victory; Political science; Politics; Public opinion; Spoilt vote; Language change; General election; Social psychology; Psychology; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.08358256831837564,"score_gpt":0.45767324344509824,"score_spread":0.3740906751267226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4363675809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870839,0.000006157962,0.000122022146,0.011000157,0.00008562117,0.0005689093,0.0000068069644,0.00018886295,0.00093754486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872833,0.0000037302457,0.000036836824,0.00004810055,0.00026763903,0.00015089252,0.00001697264,0.00002082833,0.00072669116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473166,0.0017054596,0.00035251587,0.00042149462,0.0009926163,0.001796269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975768,0.0012029788,0.00004709562,0.00017164426,0.00038907104,0.0006124199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013144255,0.00015832174,0.00029258753,0.0005891567,0.0008310547,0.00026914556,0.00012381357,0.00014032569,0.000070654954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013486587,0.00013842381,0.000049658447,0.0022048,0.0008830708,0.00036472618,0.000016662154,0.0009610606,0.000119768694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009764991,0.00009481875,0.8436737,0.00001948972,0.00002590199,0.000018549843,0.0028054272,8.523679e-7,0.002238589,0.14685273,0.0003233874,0.0038488943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003502339,0.0010290897,0.9700489,0.000025764724,0.000010546295,0.000003093796,0.0034305353,0.00028386884,0.000053008247,0.024427159,0.00018083834,0.00015696672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58153963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59865546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12637518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077755377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052879495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63918847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377088537","doi":"10.1177/10659129231176211","title":"Jobs and Punishment: Public Opinion on Leniency for White-Collar Crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"White-collar crime; Public opinion; Wrongdoing; Incentive; Legitimacy; Affect (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); Business; Retributive justice; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.3771322186534036,"score_gpt":0.5457266805041591,"score_spread":0.1685944618507555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377088537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38763782,0.00020688333,0.0009905671,0.256855,0.0013030889,0.0025494522,0.00035327245,0.00048608685,0.3496178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362797,0.00003523581,0.00003525362,0.00015827679,0.0004634662,0.00019413208,0.000023667637,0.000014610863,0.0054474077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968853,0.00042635947,0.00020835493,0.00032319917,0.00078512443,0.0013716446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979249,0.0009126118,0.000017240875,0.00021025365,0.0003258952,0.00060907414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024809893,0.00008760258,0.00012490433,0.00036054073,0.00096793653,0.0004926573,0.00028253338,0.00009345032,0.0006413717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013494142,0.00008257469,0.00010178801,0.00050854695,0.00050952117,0.00024796065,0.00004433149,0.00022986048,0.0004768416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014588798,0.00010702254,0.0011525637,0.00003147157,0.0000085356205,0.000001938398,0.0022084555,1.158013e-8,0.000036185265,0.95624954,0.030144157,0.010045523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072414137,0.0036637709,0.05061748,0.00011372762,0.0000056355175,0.0000011011692,0.02959671,0.0002681262,0.00006757104,0.28933585,0.6253351,0.00027078838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013937361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037481045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6669137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015397771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018070919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74446833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381513502","doi":"10.1177/10659129231183915","title":"Hierarchical Interactions and Compliance in Comparative Courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Scholarship; Compliance (psychology); Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Certiorari; Judicial independence; Judicial opinion; Original jurisdiction; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3859601098573573,"score_gpt":0.5436304890340797,"score_spread":0.15767037917672244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381513502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.658359,0.000085967484,0.000041211537,0.049663704,0.00014482616,0.00027309667,0.000021389973,0.00008061998,0.2913302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899614,0.000023708946,0.000023130495,0.00010109625,0.00019647038,0.00004877741,0.0000025168954,0.000002230292,0.00060590566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979315,0.000438304,0.0001321941,0.00018573269,0.0005373246,0.00077499123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770004,0.001793392,0.000007538602,0.00005972969,0.00015224585,0.00028708667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094275427,0.00005391436,0.00012951941,0.00017896062,0.0007392683,0.00007784728,0.000118686556,0.000033213062,0.0000630557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045351338,0.000050405535,0.000021919283,0.000533766,0.0023910461,0.00012289658,0.000041581272,0.00038191807,0.00050000416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013606799,0.000039838,0.0020933002,0.0000030358383,0.0000053299414,0.0000193958,0.0066600554,1.2035188e-7,0.000019200093,0.9872698,0.0012573679,0.0026189082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016791768,0.00012838365,0.11506942,0.000058258596,0.0000014525248,0.0000013132793,0.030129664,0.0002717908,0.000004277179,0.8185661,0.035512928,0.000088531415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014208171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012019766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34063715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013389347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020232284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386157206","doi":"10.1177/10659129231196566","title":"The Conditional Lawmaking Benefits of Party Faction Membership in Congress","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Legislature; Politics; Political economy; Law and economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Public administration; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.28601788881659296,"score_gpt":0.5092373098453249,"score_spread":0.22321942102873193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386157206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95729274,0.000030912266,0.000007216008,0.015053763,0.00023448469,0.0003348524,0.000030935298,0.000050525752,0.026964579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985495,0.0000033630313,0.0000020836262,0.00003258637,0.00028193934,0.00007937114,0.000011051113,0.000006658147,0.0010334448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959774,0.0012270727,0.0003117107,0.0001610283,0.0010839109,0.0012388519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949689,0.0042299563,0.000033326785,0.00013552085,0.0003343145,0.00029801668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403401,0.00006114564,0.00012439798,0.00014274902,0.0005744137,0.0001064786,0.00019310424,0.00009790796,0.00011702602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018227391,0.000047053927,0.000047377613,0.0007284187,0.0008655589,0.0001611177,0.000015532589,0.00029054683,0.00023401158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015063131,0.000023693878,0.009463231,0.0000146199845,0.00000474168,0.0000020283635,0.0012152033,0.0000041913936,0.000052278025,0.9872975,0.00065687613,0.0012505982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032017587,0.0003430548,0.21481214,0.00008996151,0.000004291637,5.742195e-7,0.009677449,0.00052116835,0.00041442245,0.760321,0.013359723,0.00013599111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020991461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028709283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22697644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019876323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022401467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98901427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386505911","doi":"10.1177/10659129231194270","title":"Issue Responsiveness in Canadian Politics: Are Parties Responsive to the Public Salience of Climate Change in the Question Period?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Political science; Politics; Climate change; Elite; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.5159062364615182,"score_gpt":0.5598716785761435,"score_spread":0.043965442114625275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386505911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6105916,0.00005218073,4.3770683e-7,0.38225776,0.00008517506,0.0006317027,0.00007897563,0.000019727479,0.0062824506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973575,0.00039236518,0.0000048313377,0.0013756813,0.00022707989,0.0004722594,0.000016445309,0.000008747404,0.00014507306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908641,0.006129649,0.00028234097,0.00021050144,0.00084723934,0.0016661899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617195,0.002374708,0.000032081552,0.0005204937,0.0004469254,0.0004538237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012189362,0.00008393644,0.00014311545,0.0008692687,0.0007508752,0.00022083454,0.00087503943,0.000101954814,0.00018013794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061254627,0.00006174455,0.00003670953,0.00226985,0.000793046,0.0002202394,0.0000711024,0.00039885336,0.0005317527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034925582,0.000031504413,0.015395876,0.000020647718,9.546019e-7,0.000016553613,0.19969217,3.4051232e-7,0.000017045419,0.7802149,0.00024852186,0.0043265545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091793016,0.00018688451,0.47972187,0.00013212918,0.0000012396355,0.0000012988763,0.4328895,0.00015089393,0.0000034991472,0.010990461,0.07574204,0.00008838086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6180663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9635797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76922446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006206975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006522437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73331934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391946084","doi":"10.1177/10659129241234839","title":"Exploring the Threat of Fake News: Facts, Opinions, and Judgement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Judgement; Disinformation; Misinformation; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Public opinion; Politics; Supreme court; Political science; Fake news; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Philosophy; Social media","score_opus":0.40596264149483197,"score_gpt":0.49018699451360265,"score_spread":0.08422435301877068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391946084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5719456,0.0006038586,0.00038396547,0.10885652,0.0005500332,0.0007150342,0.000050912233,0.00012798396,0.31676605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846494,0.00018937269,0.000029101953,0.0001368714,0.00019912297,0.000011818373,0.0000026818914,0.000004938161,0.00096117606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979354,0.00028325137,0.00018243819,0.00011153308,0.0008577228,0.0006296692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983532,0.0010067879,0.000008819886,0.00015042773,0.00011291454,0.0003678739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018234581,0.000055445133,0.00008121865,0.00013405719,0.00034583473,0.0003451136,0.00018114079,0.000028797,0.00020477036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071191025,0.000035769277,0.00003494314,0.00029726585,0.00056842674,0.0005397611,0.0000296931,0.00023235865,0.00015483833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032757305,0.000010495127,0.000032560296,0.00003813601,0.000007854256,0.0000011294562,0.037093475,4.2474113e-8,0.0000096695085,0.88395476,0.0029782718,0.07587032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024921386,0.0007299083,0.015744938,0.00026736755,0.000010951082,0.0000027624951,0.41439953,0.00031005623,0.00027183082,0.11738345,0.45044494,0.00018504204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003750439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003177844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76657134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008635918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027488644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5669567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395046023","doi":"10.1177/10659129241248406","title":"Mechanisms of Political Responsiveness: The Information Sources Shaping Elected Representatives' Policy Actions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Parliament; Political action; Public administration; Public policy; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.18156674867475991,"score_gpt":0.5088835050591657,"score_spread":0.32731675638440577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395046023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.537651,0.00024222508,0.021722093,0.287211,0.00076701277,0.002376336,0.00020357931,0.00060338585,0.14922336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982248,0.000002140026,0.00004904234,0.00027905486,0.0006014295,0.00012202391,0.0000107063515,0.000013653837,0.00069714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934708,0.0025338593,0.0005290867,0.00023488968,0.0014385829,0.0017927764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99349433,0.0047379434,0.000040141356,0.00029155318,0.0007721054,0.00066390366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031899936,0.00012681202,0.00020279457,0.00053838536,0.0008380979,0.0005126521,0.00036167426,0.00016325367,0.00019993792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005805857,0.000093554896,0.00012955995,0.0016167845,0.0013219323,0.0008116365,0.00004061974,0.0005964271,0.00030841012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003290837,0.000032803997,0.00008619303,0.00006918235,0.000027758277,0.0000028257848,0.0065232855,5.187612e-7,0.0016199411,0.9897475,0.0003853428,0.0014717281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012595337,0.0005556295,0.0066359453,0.0001509103,0.000019622064,0.000004757742,0.024852276,0.00058527145,0.0025126934,0.94760495,0.01679824,0.00015373237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097259276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018574988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4605738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005641902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016905542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90875214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399264791","doi":"10.1177/10659129241257856","title":"Representational Style Across National and Constituency Contexts: Members of Parliament in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Parliament; Style (visual arts); Variation (astronomy); Demographics; Sample (material); Political science; Geography; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.16692333551840202,"score_gpt":0.4960754523194646,"score_spread":0.3291521168010626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399264791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965717,0.00009544837,0.000010018928,0.03151585,0.00008055878,0.00031365975,0.000061294464,0.000008148644,0.0021979746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966424,0.0000022157349,0.000009309646,0.00009480326,0.00015681179,0.000026319069,0.0000073263554,0.0000036347349,0.0030571593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973384,0.0006517858,0.00027864517,0.00017900212,0.000949523,0.0006026131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633926,0.0029947737,0.000018164972,0.00006277351,0.00022078186,0.00036426686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021580104,0.000062090825,0.00013124867,0.00008204732,0.00017189965,0.00017401471,0.00008509299,0.000054844928,0.00014505535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011185999,0.000045481138,0.000019010178,0.00035263083,0.0014528501,0.00011797999,0.000015355316,0.0002286849,0.000005395384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035049656,0.000012257715,0.008660339,0.000027413804,0.000013942029,0.0000061997466,0.005026776,0.0000012306474,0.000017141067,0.9814233,0.0045466716,0.00022964425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030479517,0.0003915964,0.16992398,0.00043150937,0.000022090933,0.0000098627315,0.015054125,0.0019343281,0.00008423,0.70781875,0.10095833,0.00032326003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92276996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2736046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026972443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012791691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53530866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411683287","doi":"10.1177/10659129251355606","title":"Examining the Effects of 2SLGBTQI+ Candidates on 2SLGBTQI+ Voter Turnout in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; McMaster University; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voter turnout; Turnout; Political science; Demographic economics; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.05346100559021138,"score_gpt":0.4039413867672941,"score_spread":0.3504803811770827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411683287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8880465,0.00007816071,0.000018257371,0.014043558,0.00033339343,0.00043301738,0.000008510535,0.000008856557,0.09702977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976955,0.000007733223,0.0000069682683,0.00036011162,0.00011016407,0.000046042114,0.0000022848226,0.0000063504776,0.0017648641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963014,0.0010789075,0.0002588933,0.00023602054,0.0010214326,0.0011033348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941944,0.00507719,0.000024990593,0.00028662645,0.00017870049,0.00023810744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012930562,0.000090218215,0.00016989821,0.00021287681,0.00029962647,0.0000799998,0.00039000655,0.00006810529,0.000032062006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019652587,0.00006429089,0.000034878587,0.00048384088,0.00049850554,0.00005784793,0.000036464466,0.000429005,0.000012875783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027646447,0.000068709596,0.032996077,0.00011263874,0.000022673286,0.000027962598,0.0075922054,0.0000014712093,0.00024498114,0.9508053,0.0020104204,0.0060898885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011505502,0.0010676517,0.5745386,0.0005302982,0.00002313642,8.645918e-7,0.1011002,0.0004006373,0.004717468,0.31000707,0.006156904,0.00030663353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97443587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9198271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6407983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007984372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00326272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5787925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413767348","doi":"10.1177/10659129251365875","title":"Neighboring Groups and Political Attacks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09336881144052239,"score_gpt":0.5115225167540441,"score_spread":0.41815370531352175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413767348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28443497,0.00010096254,0.0002948438,0.049437117,0.0004280356,0.00021169744,0.000005334072,0.00008330797,0.6650037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328643,0.00000930559,0.00005161164,0.0014338073,0.0007410895,0.000041498493,0.0000013313997,0.000008795925,0.004426145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958691,0.00085865054,0.00023015184,0.00037028757,0.00058328273,0.0020885128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970324,0.001697896,0.000010815863,0.00020449622,0.00025223652,0.0008021585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015991537,0.00010448369,0.00019311848,0.00024092381,0.00076353265,0.0002156466,0.00033829312,0.00021610796,0.00027693145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014782605,0.00010028361,0.00006677601,0.00046936714,0.0021432645,0.0001726232,0.000066422566,0.00059913594,0.00018762726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019968093,0.00006946126,0.004042675,0.000012785147,0.00001372953,0.000010213722,0.002484719,8.7680857e-10,0.00008641356,0.9810588,0.0024245093,0.009776729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031591288,0.00036533512,0.03338178,0.000040144183,0.0000068889135,0.0000015561477,0.03579672,0.00001330379,0.00003290817,0.879727,0.050189875,0.00012856653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069240606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092188106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70885146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030298615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002796419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}