{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d6d614a06de","filters":{"venue":"Political Science Research and Methods"},"cohort_total":33,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":33,"exported":33,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d6d614a06de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Science+Research+and+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W2469586763","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2016.31","title":"How to Survey About Electoral Turnout? The Efficacy of the Face-Saving Response Items in 19 Different Contexts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; National election; Face (sociological concept); Null hypothesis; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Government (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Voter turnout; Political science; Econometrics; Psychology; Public economics; Economics; Statistics; Sociology; Politics; Voting; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.2304256022767907,"score_gpt":0.5535494463615038,"score_spread":0.3231238440847131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469586763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397926,0.0002269413,0.025824146,0.0015139827,0.00036122286,0.003027515,0.0009593441,0.00026772142,0.028026653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95579714,0.00019832789,0.03445616,0.0008529961,0.0001302476,0.00581296,0.0006698414,0.00008523001,0.0019971728],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9130684,0.07506618,0.0028676973,0.003702403,0.004515356,0.000779947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64328,0.2921474,0.016911974,0.034089804,0.011804682,0.0017661441],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078617014,0.0007733606,0.00083714986,0.0012708259,0.00078932155,0.001942756,0.00086193817,0.0014065417,0.0055962927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1921901,0.0005008605,0.0011455745,0.0013308193,0.0024523886,0.0025511393,0.0012665404,0.0014369225,0.0017819089],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008477757,0.007325076,0.4031394,0.0015308305,0.0018657498,0.00009860313,0.016229777,0.0040825983,0.019256009,0.009443693,0.007486966,0.5210635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091227976,0.010152884,0.9316958,0.0004999806,0.0005865549,0.00013908622,0.005764158,0.008166903,0.019144695,0.008159243,0.014496228,0.00028222863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064939394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000997675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92138296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047216553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005351948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41577148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527915749","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2016.39","title":"Which Matters Most: Party Strategic Exit or Voter Strategic Voting? A Laboratory Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Competition (biology); Fragmentation (computing); Political science; Business; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.30350042534087784,"score_gpt":0.5658816801086923,"score_spread":0.2623812547678145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527915749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99118024,0.00007274513,0.0016819194,0.000485163,0.00009121352,0.00041048924,0.00021649609,0.00004300752,0.0058186287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239844,0.00007229021,0.0033084943,0.00073689193,0.00008286343,0.00085748074,0.0002040822,0.000026698679,0.0023128542],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969471,0.0016983555,0.00015495198,0.0007100862,0.00023527072,0.0002541417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975969,0.016146122,0.003634423,0.0023203853,0.0003809124,0.0015491334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005601483,0.0006212379,0.001127588,0.00028230634,0.0008550659,0.0017256268,0.0009671748,0.0017170935,0.014682171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013504106,0.0003679598,0.00048478117,0.00029378093,0.0021018183,0.0011396626,0.0011295958,0.0019308552,0.0011463239],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16250305,0.18245648,0.16845353,0.002964995,0.001607278,0.0016522185,0.008815219,0.006692124,0.28202263,0.06869606,0.012723597,0.101412855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04551261,0.27301654,0.34314057,0.00040846854,0.0025213412,0.0013667892,0.006886289,0.057317752,0.082370356,0.1543037,0.032575063,0.0005805155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043551016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004999833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014682171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005231054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007305476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04911679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765917772","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2017.32","title":"Turnout and Education: Is Education Proxying for Pre-Adult Experiences Within the Family?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Sibling; Census; Variety (cybernetics); Social psychology; Robustness (evolution); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Population; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31777671541438085,"score_gpt":0.6486009518530439,"score_spread":0.33082423643866304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765917772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946554,0.00030608915,0.0014595679,0.00020274485,0.000017940873,0.000025727633,0.00027891432,0.0000026871776,0.003050993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989845,0.000048240374,0.0003428735,0.00004085943,0.00000720989,0.000023497569,0.00013145471,0.0000014956096,0.00041974563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359447,0.0041774074,0.00029672156,0.0010152616,0.00048148658,0.00043466056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97949195,0.009567641,0.0065569314,0.0028031159,0.000606631,0.0009738516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005266977,0.00023004126,0.00052087463,0.0008050673,0.00089124776,0.0012387714,0.0011569276,0.00061290764,0.0038197322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01926719,0.00016283544,0.00041634165,0.0013106383,0.0013956737,0.00087904156,0.0013183878,0.00060510606,0.00023403516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019393637,0.00008812335,0.9900675,0.000031358602,0.0001637498,0.00006605278,0.0018508935,0.00012390355,0.0001837724,0.0025502439,0.00012221048,0.0045582918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021862075,0.0002632237,0.99095047,0.0000517144,0.00021387039,0.00011561441,0.0031729497,0.0007557162,0.000570623,0.0024169155,0.0014528505,0.000014067187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010563559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013539758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010563559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057425554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005582798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0278548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790304980","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2018.3","title":"Elites Tweet to Get Feet Off the Streets: Measuring Regime Social Media Strategies During Protest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social media; Narrative; Censorship; Rhetorical question; Media studies; Political science; Democracy; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Criticism; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.23777898043035262,"score_gpt":0.5423418810115296,"score_spread":0.30456290058117697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790304980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956583,0.00006489253,0.00021467218,0.000071857365,0.000006639566,0.000028762073,0.00030566173,0.0000053652207,0.0036438524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980064,0.00007627615,0.00033297724,0.000024243318,0.000014499988,0.00006941539,0.0003759947,0.00000582906,0.0010943923],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994429,0.00018111622,0.000044350465,0.000103037506,0.00010132955,0.00012741161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962243,0.0016880878,0.0012456769,0.00019539545,0.00032926493,0.00031726825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009488844,0.00020342755,0.00022497082,0.002332721,0.0010129537,0.0018943307,0.00029474797,0.00061084435,0.0026037549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066553815,0.0002056369,0.00014488932,0.0017056226,0.0005056652,0.0014854557,0.0013427001,0.0006416283,0.0006345746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003054134,0.00026028472,0.91802996,0.00014697535,0.00008573543,0.0002220011,0.04429149,0.00039189318,0.0035933116,0.0014270488,0.0015444357,0.02970155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073958868,0.00007264402,0.96452254,0.000046470715,0.00002653489,0.00006979401,0.02981565,0.0010148352,0.0004700756,0.00036684054,0.003571067,0.000016112084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008200334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018784443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008200334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006105519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002894237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016305208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901429828","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2018.51","title":"Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Measure (data warehouse); Representation (politics); Social psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Power (physics); Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.17061004875804833,"score_gpt":0.5230144405054461,"score_spread":0.3524043917473978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901429828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98751885,0.000049975755,0.005571675,0.00013313352,0.000016068796,0.000057474255,0.0001786505,0.00004005075,0.006434228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957278,0.000028396968,0.0038889346,0.000017689747,0.0000062237955,0.00005822691,0.000084132786,0.0000048496445,0.00018385841],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674654,0.0017336166,0.00020998379,0.0003195757,0.00080787716,0.00018243288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853844,0.0057351924,0.0035982293,0.0015807927,0.0029713437,0.0007300274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024529626,0.00029907038,0.00027634914,0.0026204626,0.0009225001,0.0025436226,0.00052670744,0.0006638818,0.0022239052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021296574,0.00026936663,0.00037468827,0.002017411,0.0015720198,0.002560318,0.002420193,0.0006487726,0.00021188617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031196157,0.00032743078,0.8628558,0.00028109417,0.00021859696,0.00022717222,0.048869535,0.002286183,0.0042026527,0.007449043,0.0017546568,0.071215875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005051616,0.00067488744,0.8566236,0.00019524411,0.00015587728,0.00030420127,0.09641386,0.012068422,0.0042121173,0.014847326,0.014244437,0.0002094869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005767283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009642691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005767283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006407342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063116883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0129727125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947264546","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2019.24","title":"Are election results more unpredictable? A forecasting test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Econometrics; Economics; Test (biology); Term (time); Power (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics)","score_opus":0.2884577020752932,"score_gpt":0.5701558960756319,"score_spread":0.2816981940003387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947264546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501913,0.0004094318,0.023167392,0.005296206,0.00031121535,0.00017229284,0.0017732019,0.00020564155,0.018473279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981128,0.000051239957,0.0005795388,0.0001439779,0.00011675908,0.000032214477,0.0004725529,0.0000148542495,0.00047612385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889838,0.0047408957,0.00060597784,0.0030011144,0.0016618756,0.0010063889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6030311,0.3503145,0.021400828,0.018239925,0.004578854,0.0024348246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033114646,0.0009894746,0.0013399165,0.0013869664,0.0013202231,0.002737131,0.0026088567,0.002602174,0.019803287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17785898,0.00031151233,0.0016333541,0.0021419595,0.0037471643,0.0048962617,0.0014286832,0.0030154008,0.001571855],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038075224,0.001011013,0.8111623,0.00027941813,0.0015216087,0.0010584176,0.0018248339,0.05270926,0.001142441,0.042379282,0.008914661,0.07418927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005245511,0.0025499286,0.38423878,0.00018587986,0.0010039604,0.0005350648,0.002949497,0.50326496,0.0020508685,0.09645925,0.006077815,0.00015947301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005681665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025287203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033114646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010179407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009998293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17512906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011539761","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.8","title":"Voting at 16: Does lowering the voting age lead to more political engagement? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in the city of Ghent (Belgium)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Suffrage; Leverage (statistics); Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.42817438456282914,"score_gpt":0.5892127976823313,"score_spread":0.16103841311950212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011539761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985789,0.000052749525,0.00017999101,0.00011343655,0.000020208803,0.000111005305,0.00020197542,0.000005398646,0.0007362998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794227,0.00003694291,0.00036428068,0.00013551822,0.00001307114,0.00032339245,0.00022833147,0.000007088528,0.0009491137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919228,0.0064169406,0.00012406768,0.0007429043,0.0002731347,0.00052018947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985338,0.008141001,0.0030853627,0.0016476433,0.000610877,0.0011770426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008296375,0.00038837994,0.0007405275,0.0002918146,0.0014328108,0.0014157824,0.0011477852,0.0012157746,0.008102873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853079,0.00047230555,0.00064647617,0.00047701123,0.0023131862,0.00057002064,0.00071265484,0.001020252,0.0008733889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07450141,0.0698228,0.7317181,0.0015539571,0.0032520676,0.0012405767,0.031294785,0.0030980997,0.012837434,0.006153225,0.010962626,0.053564876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044414885,0.019793319,0.95469683,0.00011445417,0.0006789957,0.0000749987,0.009698647,0.0017232173,0.0015780049,0.0012520041,0.00586532,0.000082681385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055187166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06002629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055187166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014927733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015902134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10973185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025393907","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.18","title":"Placebo statements in list experiments: Evidence from a face-to-face survey in Singapore","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treatment and control groups; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Placebo; Inflation (cosmology); Interpretation (philosophy); Statement (logic); Survey data collection; Social psychology; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Alternative medicine; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.7576034810771761,"score_gpt":0.6772032127523472,"score_spread":0.08040026832482894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025393907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93326235,0.0037424965,0.032700866,0.0064071375,0.0011607349,0.0038741468,0.0013129809,0.00020906144,0.017330183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891802,0.0006307324,0.0045721317,0.0019175408,0.00024648235,0.0019120836,0.0003012414,0.000028120523,0.0012115624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.69996375,0.27010152,0.009222477,0.006676727,0.012362287,0.0016732787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2803855,0.59787786,0.07490744,0.034153085,0.010714309,0.0019617823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17697093,0.0009460737,0.001548691,0.0007502239,0.0021374116,0.0030316762,0.0021916346,0.004594446,0.013269067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37708277,0.000693386,0.0016844111,0.001264086,0.007060084,0.0037845767,0.00200124,0.0037727226,0.0020816638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14564015,0.0414817,0.25434768,0.016143687,0.00916591,0.0017923946,0.028334409,0.003491364,0.0054300874,0.041317176,0.022119094,0.43073636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04130429,0.14013383,0.54923457,0.010758213,0.011769049,0.0016187961,0.018317465,0.030195067,0.024541209,0.09007098,0.08116873,0.0008878163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011437268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069809036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17697093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001314394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014178501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034271659","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.21","title":"Betting on the underdog: the influence of social networks on vote choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Voting; Homogeneity (statistics); Microeconomics; Social network (sociolinguistics); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social media; Machine learning","score_opus":0.3161378258146733,"score_gpt":0.5836273683340438,"score_spread":0.2674895425193705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034271659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99013853,0.00010209025,0.00094661524,0.0005624874,0.000014131332,0.000010534134,0.000077278644,0.0000075520284,0.008140704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996549,0.000019741592,0.00007817221,0.00002610736,0.0000068720688,0.0000032259554,0.000012829633,0.0000016894537,0.00019644153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972657,0.0020708118,0.000060961618,0.00028546437,0.00016658995,0.00015050924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435211,0.046104316,0.0067536654,0.0013762092,0.00066498696,0.001579795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037946503,0.00019548168,0.00036892892,0.0006126673,0.0007147681,0.0019161325,0.00028913937,0.0006865227,0.011191057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027563151,0.0001259555,0.00023079658,0.0005556062,0.0016018806,0.0012276517,0.0008464249,0.00092435646,0.00040921837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047813505,0.00168001,0.78399533,0.00049554836,0.00087170413,0.0006645969,0.0062647667,0.026102513,0.014680473,0.067747764,0.0048842407,0.087831736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034192723,0.0014611478,0.8514787,0.00015469274,0.00068232225,0.00030087828,0.0067216135,0.055501033,0.0046937717,0.07086134,0.007680347,0.00012229152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018899246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011191057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006619097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001871812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037437856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037341367","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.25","title":"Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Voting; Referendum; Climate change; Flooding (psychology); Flood myth; Exploit; Extreme weather; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Geospatial analysis; Politics; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.24071952653239828,"score_gpt":0.5179058000293262,"score_spread":0.2771862734969279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037341367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97689635,0.00078767014,0.00068862847,0.0056796656,0.00010885993,0.00002084853,0.00022036077,0.00000545817,0.015592217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986682,0.0002512764,0.00007442784,0.00024963758,0.00004044866,0.000006069796,0.00005360355,0.0000016063492,0.00065478723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990784,0.0005953251,0.000022557248,0.000088828674,0.000055696026,0.00015924714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972512,0.0015447302,0.0006738385,0.00011515941,0.00015938093,0.0002556127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012037456,0.00013600106,0.00022877633,0.00046545058,0.00044373612,0.0011997952,0.00015517016,0.0005673465,0.0063230707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060477545,0.00009625438,0.00022377366,0.00048693235,0.0007157268,0.0007607435,0.0004893384,0.00046108649,0.0006326815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005396842,0.00046436896,0.88740987,0.00035492293,0.00023411412,0.00018616904,0.009173703,0.00091804686,0.0013517137,0.0077278777,0.0050470103,0.08659261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054291275,0.0004906368,0.9385257,0.00014583141,0.0001250119,0.00015548046,0.031122865,0.0014937571,0.0006400234,0.011628562,0.01558698,0.00003091648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013345235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031547367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063230707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030105692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024157319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021152794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049205357","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.30","title":"Transformed-likelihood estimators for dynamic panel models with a very small <i>T</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Panel data; Extremum estimator; Econometrics; M-estimator; Mathematics; Random effects model; Fixed effects model; Statistics; Invariant estimator; Efficient estimator; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","score_opus":0.2946374840912235,"score_gpt":0.42196148940358674,"score_spread":0.12732400531236326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049205357","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002887514,0.00027759367,0.99125415,0.0002681437,0.00007396672,0.00009056785,0.00095610064,0.000898718,0.003293358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1475613,0.0011582174,0.83072096,0.00061515043,0.00026477105,0.0012210311,0.0073353797,0.0012379929,0.009885043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573106,0.0028671443,0.00019291282,0.00048403922,0.0005864498,0.00013839206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861302,0.008360793,0.0016017075,0.0028305445,0.0009540701,0.00012266045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006183562,0.0006305048,0.0007532409,0.0017803862,0.00041086695,0.0017099468,0.0019407553,0.0011123954,0.021154344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04732617,0.00056982966,0.001484434,0.0034230147,0.0009607482,0.0025592588,0.0017153968,0.0024361103,0.007997799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016083974,0.00017311214,0.011873813,0.00065156067,0.0005169658,0.00024476016,0.0005240047,0.08233092,0.0023711785,0.41946158,0.050398305,0.43129304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015353649,0.00012554512,0.008271314,0.00028886241,0.00019168099,0.000421385,0.00041556955,0.4699178,0.004655663,0.415896,0.09953696,0.00012566274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031482754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044560498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021154344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008789683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020555425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07076836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123162206","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.38","title":"How responsive is Trade Adjustment Assistance?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Free trade; Voting; International economics; Presidential election; Politics; Liberalization; Economic integration; Development economics; International trade; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.3243835393476171,"score_gpt":0.5869592112514462,"score_spread":0.26257567190382913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123162206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71483976,0.0036391793,0.0038994935,0.11124301,0.000984958,0.00008060831,0.002429296,0.00017608723,0.16270766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936098,0.00038956443,0.00016001817,0.002385078,0.00025372783,0.000020773152,0.0001986718,0.000018059012,0.0029643413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028426,0.00524757,0.00033459562,0.0007320066,0.001514294,0.0018873264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767303,0.010362828,0.0062921983,0.0009858662,0.002831441,0.0027973645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072220783,0.00024262255,0.0003995946,0.0025513263,0.0012138018,0.004722473,0.0008008959,0.0012033787,0.013551947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031588163,0.00015466925,0.00036948005,0.0031809954,0.0019545066,0.0022323849,0.0018563865,0.0022162683,0.0015814209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093980436,0.0006450606,0.5836462,0.00069248077,0.0010040682,0.00058328244,0.006448247,0.011661789,0.003919913,0.1074235,0.061648577,0.22138703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013091337,0.0005126717,0.6401541,0.00065263576,0.0003221805,0.00033852633,0.026547644,0.0052837515,0.004163548,0.057608165,0.2641262,0.00015953768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006447867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060950797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013551947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027507008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023221583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04533577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165696130","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.10","title":"The best at the top? Candidate ranking strategies under closed list proportional representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Proportional representation; Incentive; Legislature; Competence (human resources); Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Order (exchange); Political science; Public relations; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Management","score_opus":0.2597051134036285,"score_gpt":0.6149408002078486,"score_spread":0.3552356868042201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165696130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77959275,0.00028495473,0.09472435,0.0041612843,0.00010354907,0.0003523105,0.0002144631,0.00019984518,0.120366514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880449,0.00004367695,0.0052695596,0.0001516885,0.00002777576,0.00006258189,0.000033635642,0.000014905356,0.0063512116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929011,0.0046567963,0.00015941772,0.00049723865,0.0006357321,0.0011497093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884884,0.00759492,0.0013846965,0.00081047014,0.000612326,0.0011092742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066860607,0.00056421716,0.0010992613,0.0013320176,0.0018964073,0.0043393173,0.0012915517,0.0019808062,0.018388702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02249566,0.00036725678,0.0004876551,0.0011464412,0.0015963932,0.003295649,0.0027495003,0.0016438884,0.0018325025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026088934,0.0015860716,0.01240085,0.00046219685,0.00020887713,0.0006818965,0.0035566387,0.0729511,0.00778962,0.6995068,0.0114899585,0.18675716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007473994,0.0021758883,0.0117141055,0.00016387869,0.00016649227,0.00046821267,0.0047576968,0.49015495,0.0038046476,0.46475387,0.020930862,0.00016193562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018928401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001974164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018388702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017717286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010739686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061516285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175973093","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.24","title":"Are voters' views about proportional outcomes shaped by partisan preferences? A survey experiment in the context of a real election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Proportional representation; General election; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Political science; Survey data collection; Economics; Public administration; Public economics; Microeconomics; Law; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.41226343439738633,"score_gpt":0.6054310415336063,"score_spread":0.19316760713621994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175973093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958324,0.000012455246,0.0005652523,0.00013651217,0.000016854985,0.0001831476,0.000095664094,0.0000049787664,0.0031527572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762136,0.000015386924,0.00091836264,0.00013263834,0.000014182186,0.0004022496,0.00008037223,0.0000035603432,0.0008119623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858242,0.011157339,0.00043195428,0.00087218557,0.0010247679,0.0006895412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94824064,0.03568052,0.009001775,0.0043263086,0.0016338401,0.0011168551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017577896,0.0003583333,0.0006967208,0.00035667213,0.0015307947,0.0032232518,0.00062223466,0.001360523,0.0065407273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044767357,0.00037612265,0.0004979586,0.00048414755,0.00287211,0.0010464186,0.0009803245,0.0013472416,0.0006336174],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09178141,0.052682176,0.55474585,0.001625025,0.0019202973,0.00050744996,0.06290632,0.01796689,0.0671432,0.058493957,0.0062856553,0.08394179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011904145,0.05756638,0.80333984,0.00026207068,0.0011333347,0.00014093929,0.03162671,0.029542862,0.018999148,0.026987717,0.017765436,0.0007313794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009228277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011544729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017577896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001693119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011836326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185989073","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.43","title":"Misattributed blame? Attitudes toward globalization in the age of automation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Blame; Globalization; Immigration; Polarization (electrochemistry); Job loss; Economics; Economic inequality; Labour economics; Inequality; Development economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Social psychology; Psychology; Market economy; Law; Unemployment","score_opus":0.36774677675284545,"score_gpt":0.6462130885628508,"score_spread":0.2784663118100053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185989073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856263,0.00025405927,0.00047578994,0.0055622775,0.000059479727,0.0000051010843,0.000013781467,0.0000063536954,0.007996827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998836,0.000082586674,0.000044346827,0.0006116402,0.000015439517,0.0000018054059,0.000003840115,0.0000022535896,0.00040212835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617237,0.002543389,0.00012676853,0.00020183426,0.0005737109,0.00038200116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732197,0.01137055,0.009876616,0.001907143,0.0021335676,0.0014923781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006317259,0.00021721466,0.00023903871,0.00081061135,0.0027626783,0.004027263,0.0004195651,0.0016713422,0.0045816107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023167782,0.00023118242,0.00029270566,0.00057032466,0.0057394174,0.003025835,0.0020642988,0.0029370403,0.00043409909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001516446,0.00031253477,0.52649397,0.00009720418,0.00008358119,0.0004897922,0.42653847,0.00019185642,0.00095898577,0.012877036,0.004319539,0.02748542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019504301,0.00023768276,0.3351981,0.00046642148,0.00005714565,0.0008800312,0.6298589,0.0008071136,0.00097537,0.009595177,0.02180351,0.000101022146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034571884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037418245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006317259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009420032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072746264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033409238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186935905","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.41","title":"Hypothesis testing with error correction models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Bivariate analysis; Null hypothesis; Error detection and correction; Econometrics; Mathematics; Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Error correction model; Order (exchange); Null (SQL); Type I and type II errors; Statistical hypothesis testing; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.5716359837438698,"score_gpt":0.4538477963276327,"score_spread":0.11778818741623709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186935905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048924156,0.0011372333,0.9373001,0.0043013184,0.00096263306,0.0010379056,0.001248517,0.0007428716,0.004345323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69085425,0.00066227786,0.29784742,0.0014279196,0.0010330102,0.004180316,0.001416606,0.00021551948,0.0023627188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6691986,0.2855264,0.008242432,0.02024855,0.0135997515,0.0031844073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21606673,0.7434082,0.014495209,0.018612552,0.0064647147,0.00095255097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1510698,0.003365413,0.0062548104,0.005131518,0.0025054037,0.0061700414,0.007353027,0.0061565298,0.013458813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48699525,0.0014439959,0.005882767,0.0066452883,0.009284433,0.006884257,0.0046116905,0.009326524,0.0015162671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003554869,0.0007300071,0.04781469,0.0027704681,0.009916013,0.0024373494,0.0021296022,0.15040162,0.0010944834,0.6271693,0.0107793175,0.14120227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087082764,0.00086966984,0.004845347,0.00043265516,0.0005283116,0.00029382264,0.0005210498,0.41039997,0.0015330155,0.57500786,0.0045485487,0.00014895448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003524475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013758582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1510698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034941304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004710659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79894304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225287051","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.19","title":"Belief in territorial indivisibility and public preferences for dispute resolution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Dispute resolution; Territorial dispute; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1686199981946572,"score_gpt":0.529223394189552,"score_spread":0.36060339599489477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225287051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99496907,0.000027151767,0.00020844197,0.00015888416,0.0000022424767,0.000004267959,0.000010178865,9.2273444e-7,0.004618883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998282,0.000009775722,0.000025403857,0.000011419706,0.0000016799725,0.0000011872163,0.0000057286734,2.4559247e-7,0.000116346775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.0007623553,0.00010383621,0.000117635915,0.00023582208,0.00023527308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827271,0.0066003534,0.0073489747,0.001005356,0.000971578,0.001346682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030174875,0.00012536632,0.00016996768,0.00057839183,0.0006273692,0.0018786232,0.00022993183,0.0005216609,0.005157729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011719027,0.00011097652,0.0001570138,0.0005144106,0.0014145776,0.0006126696,0.00061434286,0.0008505178,0.00022183415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024117362,0.0005483786,0.9628633,0.00004991011,0.0001061943,0.00027249774,0.010149176,0.0007410698,0.0019077687,0.0092098685,0.00033247698,0.013578074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045619778,0.00023324169,0.9596251,0.000053696156,0.000051450916,0.000246198,0.027736915,0.0027435047,0.0007996711,0.0058387714,0.0025988484,0.000026936237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022054834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031454796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005157729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006376596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034186363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017254353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234871730","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.18","title":"Am I obliged to vote? A regression discontinuity analysis of compulsory voting with ill-informed voters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Regression discontinuity design; Confusion; Demographic economics; Political science; Disapproval voting; Economics; Psychology; Law; Statistics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.17876924653877574,"score_gpt":0.5722743040760119,"score_spread":0.39350505753723614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234871730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890966,0.00033833113,0.0072638094,0.00083207584,0.000033206623,0.00007957487,0.0004788101,0.00002651197,0.0018510219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984674,0.000034989647,0.0006138014,0.000047713107,0.000011939966,0.000028855464,0.00019295451,0.0000047332296,0.0005976648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898526,0.007274171,0.00035972035,0.0008972107,0.000532229,0.0010841413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9316732,0.047664892,0.014217065,0.0038412206,0.0014523799,0.0011511041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015788807,0.00028263056,0.001184593,0.0013587653,0.00089930545,0.0018151955,0.0021543878,0.0010084785,0.008002918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056008093,0.00028496396,0.0015025195,0.0013990946,0.0011637904,0.00078977755,0.0015637804,0.0025231661,0.0005039618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010400867,0.00048678712,0.9523712,0.000146896,0.0008481026,0.0005018741,0.0018993417,0.005189017,0.0004907459,0.015147157,0.0013469905,0.020531854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021202156,0.001138354,0.8424047,0.00021825403,0.0014188591,0.0004543307,0.006528274,0.124475345,0.0013146044,0.016233414,0.005513132,0.00008872179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024477234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01145272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024477234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001131945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008027974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08350021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281659893","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.21","title":"The politics of accountability in Supreme Court nominations: voter recall and assessment of senator votes on nominees","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Accountability; Political science; Law; Voting; Representation (politics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21496461037456688,"score_gpt":0.5925137629530368,"score_spread":0.37754915257846994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281659893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98911846,0.00036511934,0.0030367735,0.0006424149,0.000020267178,0.000014444957,0.00022799315,0.00002079423,0.006553728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938536,0.000038438273,0.0001518646,0.000021932232,0.000022038115,0.0000042756496,0.00009508792,0.000002828977,0.00027813276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475236,0.011179507,0.0007746721,0.0013280386,0.0013957808,0.0005696132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6407656,0.2677151,0.06524252,0.016321532,0.007825471,0.0021298176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015211325,0.0002611049,0.000621447,0.0020562743,0.0009154114,0.003105927,0.0006698479,0.00092478504,0.0038738265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16461289,0.00025839388,0.00038394312,0.002413982,0.001997572,0.0021398703,0.0015420127,0.0018727945,0.00066726963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006221825,0.00014500423,0.9546613,0.00008218108,0.00027008608,0.00010362235,0.0029770706,0.0023171932,0.00046972412,0.0036324498,0.00096430874,0.03375483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043261778,0.00029061554,0.9627576,0.00011027441,0.00017393196,0.00035775997,0.003688962,0.013576066,0.002355211,0.013162654,0.0034080036,0.00007569492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033106569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004550708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015211325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007932516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037799755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08044618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303413633","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.46","title":"Explaining women's political underrepresentation in democracies with high levels of corruption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; McGill University; Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"Coastal Response Research Center, University of New Hampshire; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Vignette; Language change; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2847427520885681,"score_gpt":0.560821165359426,"score_spread":0.27607841327085797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303413633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982147,0.000022543636,0.00017245527,0.000064419524,0.0000030771105,0.000009335467,0.00001784114,9.331111e-7,0.001494765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973863,0.0000070136716,0.000058024092,0.000014936167,0.0000013080557,0.000004593243,0.000007794844,3.6104646e-7,0.00016735906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966446,0.0025334987,0.000082177416,0.00020164551,0.0002679636,0.0002701178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99104285,0.0059559126,0.0019313367,0.0005444848,0.00029593502,0.00022937608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047739013,0.00014723747,0.00034109518,0.0007334268,0.0009264184,0.001702669,0.00024036472,0.00054887746,0.0044419793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010848485,0.00014655449,0.00024114357,0.00070134713,0.0011315887,0.00037982516,0.0010110697,0.0005818637,0.0002969265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008484094,0.0008625543,0.9496532,0.00011305234,0.00010951704,0.00024339397,0.016338367,0.001086037,0.0047029126,0.007221307,0.0004868914,0.018334337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041834577,0.0005506658,0.9551497,0.000046938192,0.00006121521,0.00018806082,0.03011906,0.004600409,0.0025442129,0.0040483247,0.0026231518,0.00002631312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022490046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002628558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047739013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000855017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025145995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025247097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304172327","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.51","title":"Equation balance in time series analysis: lessons learned and lessons needed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Confusion; Series (stratigraphy); Contradiction; Balance (ability); Econometrics; Monte Carlo method; Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.2612345217914732,"score_gpt":0.4671045514189034,"score_spread":0.20587002962743017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304172327","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024134088,0.031431325,0.74284375,0.18101245,0.003340161,0.0001045272,0.00025086998,0.00059458014,0.016288284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.531476,0.04190163,0.3935761,0.015986027,0.0064319265,0.00037224122,0.0004684284,0.00063134584,0.009156273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900187,0.0072298897,0.0006438169,0.0010648164,0.0017734581,0.00028616237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88404673,0.099884346,0.0016889969,0.0054087397,0.007703647,0.0012675211],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042683896,0.0009628004,0.0020233393,0.0016362127,0.00078975724,0.006450687,0.0032051513,0.0042222347,0.006145319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1284093,0.00072714797,0.001291535,0.0024254334,0.0053128023,0.015631935,0.0031947554,0.009106014,0.0015585048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009763516,0.00012896622,0.004835018,0.00048517712,0.00013929539,0.00022523102,0.001292314,0.035660446,0.00022973462,0.814559,0.01627615,0.12607092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002647118,0.000042436262,0.0005691235,0.00040034208,0.000021581794,0.00006250535,0.00044670756,0.064486295,0.00023200159,0.9157506,0.017928679,0.000033141558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006615405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024249477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025084873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032801977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22573674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309938065","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.57","title":"Is compulsory voting a solution to low and declining turnout? Cross-national evidence since 1945","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Demographic economics; Political science; Voter turnout; Sanctions; Legislation; Single-member district; Economics; Public economics; Group voting ticket; Law; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4358149035367635,"score_gpt":0.6424060597390561,"score_spread":0.20659115620229257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309938065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871228,0.0017023383,0.00030841833,0.0012739879,0.000035695135,0.000007487781,0.00024793384,0.000006165928,0.009295201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913174,0.0001855596,0.0000361006,0.0000600634,0.000019245352,0.0000013825303,0.00008911751,0.000001327534,0.00047549396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891794,0.00037763477,0.00006916147,0.00024319314,0.00011827423,0.0002738208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749185,0.007647239,0.012753406,0.0013442951,0.0016417461,0.0016948286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003556578,0.000119724435,0.0002995255,0.0012478093,0.0006537613,0.00090845075,0.000695255,0.0005989647,0.006186408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013000273,0.00013505844,0.00028906798,0.0013252401,0.0013724517,0.00049508386,0.0007166239,0.00087379804,0.00034405373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016947345,0.00013151037,0.9737317,0.00008679796,0.0001634667,0.00007928023,0.00111227,0.00024251401,0.000180544,0.0021182082,0.00064699084,0.021337213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005894127,0.000073516036,0.995606,0.000059517046,0.00006159641,0.000040925916,0.0015966773,0.00015586785,0.00014752655,0.00037054636,0.0018773936,0.00000451031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018735096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032727197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018735096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004681116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051458273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037252128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156190","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.60","title":"The effects of proposal power on incumbents' vote share: updated results from a naturally occurring experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lottery; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Parliament; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Politics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.08635897248053681,"score_gpt":0.5286014793420357,"score_spread":0.4422425068614989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98940873,0.00015859964,0.0024252038,0.00025773505,0.000047159632,0.00018470523,0.00064646173,0.000052303807,0.006819065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969007,0.00003780889,0.0014317823,0.00010688471,0.000032786433,0.00019806344,0.00024323033,0.000026271076,0.0010224453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902514,0.0062235296,0.00036982348,0.0013898674,0.0013858895,0.0003794477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8717517,0.10405694,0.0073771966,0.012813753,0.002609552,0.0013908136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014261092,0.0002568313,0.00096094824,0.00036391916,0.0010812434,0.0015716621,0.0010748518,0.0008074555,0.011152283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0707851,0.00035109048,0.0005511994,0.00050304225,0.0016750459,0.001076214,0.0011707804,0.0019889192,0.0008384379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.087225154,0.046850584,0.50799626,0.0022727468,0.004154381,0.00062144763,0.0210418,0.0067011807,0.075745605,0.043878607,0.010652297,0.1928599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026460928,0.009451631,0.93164426,0.000083093044,0.0013220066,0.00022787428,0.0023612375,0.0089323735,0.011401594,0.019349543,0.012352948,0.0002273264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007445891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007967681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014261092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092233793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008741132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0754208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391842841","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.1","title":"Attitudes toward automation and the demand for policies addressing job loss: the effects of information about trade-offs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Washington; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Job loss; Economics; Automation; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Engineering; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.195040786107986,"score_gpt":0.6009483622078439,"score_spread":0.40590757609985784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391842841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99566746,0.00005291581,0.0002362443,0.00019411625,0.000006759685,0.000025492203,0.0000441284,0.0000025062864,0.0037704043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994388,0.000041310712,0.00014401966,0.000079820085,0.0000074964546,0.000012977589,0.000030654843,0.0000017609362,0.00024311512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98783743,0.008762151,0.0005999203,0.00049896835,0.0017837527,0.00051785505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7583637,0.19981106,0.028017469,0.0062398487,0.004612565,0.0029552414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012557071,0.00023966242,0.00041275442,0.0010318588,0.0010028215,0.0047027357,0.00049780245,0.0016564006,0.0062777656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08240147,0.0003548515,0.00046262832,0.0010404413,0.00250489,0.0014216575,0.0014980299,0.002521953,0.00046172246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042051403,0.007836455,0.92119694,0.00041783025,0.0005301622,0.00036364386,0.020881152,0.005505414,0.0058003543,0.0058396785,0.00064910325,0.026774133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014040059,0.0012434641,0.9730796,0.00009117745,0.00012962538,0.00006838886,0.014815702,0.004290757,0.0014376671,0.0029566975,0.0016475226,0.000099002114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005657448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004670606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012557071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012287316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000553449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06640893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403001460","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.54","title":"Does vote buying undermine confidence in ballot secrecy? Theory and experimental evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Secrecy; Ballot; Economics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.28370327674977197,"score_gpt":0.624538513059803,"score_spread":0.34083523631003104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403001460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797238,0.0004210993,0.0034900391,0.0023194158,0.000027891569,0.000086902895,0.0001518943,0.00002465148,0.013754266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998919,0.00010382131,0.00042045422,0.00020932694,0.00001901411,0.000020038979,0.000029065342,0.000003779077,0.0002754573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915622,0.0054702885,0.00042121916,0.00089096616,0.0011261541,0.0005291531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80665183,0.12619509,0.046570092,0.01658392,0.0028952796,0.0011037262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013638427,0.0004059221,0.0009072799,0.000638452,0.0008499641,0.0021108314,0.0011383014,0.0019625672,0.010710631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062325355,0.00050434534,0.0004511313,0.0008190427,0.0060559376,0.001875399,0.001282595,0.0019337438,0.000653325],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017400233,0.013256289,0.58745474,0.0029355076,0.0026738083,0.00087136164,0.0070590186,0.009473771,0.035054326,0.17505163,0.0044151912,0.14435415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031972355,0.010516596,0.76732457,0.00047663096,0.0015709305,0.00070215826,0.005197471,0.023886545,0.031348985,0.14075509,0.014823495,0.00020022475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021134487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015518619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013638427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013806394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006930286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07212776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403469348","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.52","title":"The national network of US state legislators on Twitter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.2520658780797021,"score_gpt":0.6133919389758271,"score_spread":0.361326060896125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403469348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9190723,0.00038554886,0.0028913296,0.0019122562,0.000080795784,0.00007151177,0.035904255,0.00024453906,0.039437585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822932,0.00027408783,0.0013304165,0.00016738553,0.00006211602,0.000103075945,0.01083719,0.00004038749,0.004892266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00019990094,0.000054698998,0.00012484014,0.00014766504,0.00007236875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569196,0.0019036568,0.0011381089,0.000272498,0.0006892684,0.00030454196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053282344,0.00010624301,0.00018732654,0.0022919418,0.0007950399,0.00112038,0.00021763342,0.00031860982,0.0093763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053664944,0.00015614815,0.00014446235,0.004650371,0.00024705168,0.0014201448,0.0009454929,0.00031103098,0.0021949855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022559881,0.000097699325,0.8373437,0.0002943275,0.00011925284,0.00017807793,0.0057604993,0.0026786395,0.003938922,0.007469325,0.059032787,0.082861334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021132288,0.00007338391,0.8495758,0.00017332102,0.00008165428,0.00023102759,0.0074670454,0.026729682,0.002817277,0.0032048572,0.109569095,0.000055705852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011966311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017597597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011966311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005544009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046155087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031366825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409439245","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.19","title":"Reassessing World Bank conditionality: beyond count measures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1988634726657897,"score_gpt":0.6044226772035658,"score_spread":0.4055592045377761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409439245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217619,0.0015611968,0.12795803,0.006296005,0.00027760444,0.00016349262,0.0091236755,0.000562971,0.03229513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866002,0.00016949623,0.009245584,0.00023396168,0.00016460051,0.00013091484,0.0028165388,0.0000773808,0.0005612363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992784,0.004030839,0.00059897767,0.0012353262,0.0011171673,0.00023365882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597802,0.10138911,0.0177648,0.013213168,0.0062584463,0.0015942106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100320885,0.0004835441,0.0005705147,0.007365345,0.0017380377,0.0039153947,0.0007043342,0.00063794834,0.0076338137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12201734,0.0002516806,0.00049042597,0.012900285,0.003353895,0.0072764046,0.0030827688,0.0022460672,0.00067236274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004904312,0.00028000883,0.5221396,0.0007212768,0.0005787009,0.00029929553,0.010235158,0.009205932,0.0023836177,0.26358753,0.02450694,0.16557156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007538313,0.000187477,0.3752886,0.00051687297,0.00022990981,0.00028924862,0.0061541493,0.08030825,0.0031780866,0.49238437,0.04115519,0.00023240127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005115881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035746337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100320885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010748503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007837752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053055406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411613247","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10022","title":"The value of dignity appeals: evidence from a social media experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Dignity; Value (mathematics); Social media; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.3605461873580664,"score_gpt":0.6342577987349004,"score_spread":0.27371161137683403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411613247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899636,0.0000771541,0.0005762965,0.0006497074,0.000046017863,0.00012943351,0.000074652984,0.000009758165,0.008473382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982502,0.000063234795,0.000427366,0.00027491344,0.000049519753,0.00013100168,0.00002984187,0.000004277866,0.0007696569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915897,0.0064514275,0.0002733379,0.00057971216,0.000851776,0.00025402417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7735854,0.19655696,0.018852117,0.0064509776,0.0014286292,0.0031258862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011370491,0.0003883631,0.00045622216,0.00062518247,0.0011029368,0.0021540462,0.00064360345,0.0014921436,0.009081823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060742028,0.00034649714,0.00050616026,0.00038950972,0.0022889553,0.0016806441,0.001145305,0.0021161947,0.0007652427],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.092792235,0.12437315,0.5354584,0.0017322496,0.001951175,0.0011636324,0.016134467,0.005498721,0.025967892,0.039731417,0.006362097,0.1488346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010675213,0.056321792,0.81402886,0.00053142116,0.0022459694,0.00072234275,0.010754165,0.03418025,0.014805462,0.04346319,0.01197876,0.00029261733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015808368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011370491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005331239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004379007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060133636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412166017","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10032","title":"Legislative reciprocity: Using a proposal lottery to identify causal effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lottery; Legislature; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.24765137323634376,"score_gpt":0.6410554643837668,"score_spread":0.39340409114742303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412166017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635841,0.00013389245,0.031053847,0.0004568472,0.0000579497,0.0006192163,0.00038216685,0.00008105659,0.003630957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913195,0.00003517682,0.0070743435,0.00007388248,0.00002652001,0.0006051927,0.00019283482,0.000011518421,0.00066111056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9322391,0.058344077,0.0015401503,0.0040367697,0.002520801,0.0013190449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47782707,0.44477692,0.046023645,0.02352594,0.004613625,0.0032328002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08259043,0.000542672,0.0013829574,0.0036450154,0.0024330646,0.00242345,0.0022028773,0.0020035135,0.00995779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2581327,0.00076084206,0.001806141,0.0033282295,0.0032005766,0.0030078727,0.0029667178,0.003230486,0.00093543617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003816589,0.0019985822,0.88804406,0.00038768785,0.0016692957,0.00029944826,0.0038651149,0.012381279,0.00083956757,0.03353276,0.0016347535,0.051530987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009796661,0.005081537,0.6499928,0.00030553358,0.0015471423,0.00052346487,0.0041611833,0.25411817,0.0024944644,0.074406475,0.0060905535,0.00029897582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007632799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005116066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08259043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017333927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021381218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43678516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413085861","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10029","title":"Government ideology and support for redistribution among the wealthy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideology; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15582285467937346,"score_gpt":0.5903588336145149,"score_spread":0.43453597893514145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413085861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99637467,0.00006158574,0.00007265381,0.00025056902,0.0000045586794,0.0000046114214,0.000048846312,0.000001310223,0.003181159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996649,0.000023444361,0.000019783254,0.000025161795,0.000006744716,0.0000020588827,0.000020737458,4.7253113e-7,0.0002367187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995043,0.00019978637,0.000024196028,0.00006456904,0.00006630038,0.00014084033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939143,0.002117094,0.0025695108,0.00033161667,0.00027346812,0.00079398137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009168286,0.00013157644,0.0002854779,0.000854826,0.00081941346,0.0011757358,0.00013610808,0.0004381884,0.00985737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054379134,0.00008839804,0.000115438954,0.00049627287,0.00083699345,0.00033852895,0.0006251885,0.0005054956,0.0005745643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089174695,0.0005748405,0.96984565,0.00006205626,0.000121328194,0.00022114489,0.0025675027,0.0003988957,0.0021447192,0.0037026834,0.00080603315,0.018663399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008226041,0.00015350778,0.99134785,0.000028764065,0.000031985088,0.00006197415,0.003776428,0.0005927519,0.00031579955,0.0022363258,0.0013607341,0.000011742667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028813467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034560699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00985737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030386524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020957313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03297615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413741140","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10037","title":"On the political consequences of local deliberative governance in China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Rochester; American Political Science Association","keywords":"China; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.07095715410475366,"score_gpt":0.518614871106864,"score_spread":0.4476577170021103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413741140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348515,0.000029556733,0.00020530199,0.00023533792,0.000002747155,0.000016485492,0.00002140618,0.0000051387724,0.005999014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996221,0.000008260955,0.000033812757,0.000008246676,9.052275e-7,0.000004123698,0.000006019661,4.227594e-7,0.00031599522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.00054568064,0.00005487557,0.00013549699,0.00018300232,0.00037349013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973688,0.00087552756,0.000734282,0.00023493989,0.0003773434,0.00040903458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023608878,0.000110974295,0.00019310947,0.00084263674,0.001544666,0.0013781736,0.000302539,0.00029678756,0.0033363583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003352612,0.00009368772,0.00016016723,0.001088264,0.0020596401,0.00059158285,0.001146965,0.0003518813,0.00010148989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077055325,0.0004996967,0.7659585,0.00024717988,0.000116779556,0.0016583925,0.052124135,0.013908544,0.008046355,0.08404583,0.003042991,0.06958106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000804875,0.00035622364,0.9226981,0.000053329386,0.00009019118,0.000062617946,0.037078295,0.015234835,0.0026626834,0.011859839,0.009773056,0.000050434654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037140995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05963048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037140995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051001185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036473402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07384962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414142515","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10018","title":"Inequality, information, and income tax policy preferences in Austria and Germany","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Harvard University","keywords":"Status quo; Progressive tax; Redistribution (election); Inequality; Preference; Tax policy; Economic inequality; Status quo bias; State income tax","score_opus":0.2154974265237034,"score_gpt":0.6055336778585797,"score_spread":0.3900362513348763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414142515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971444,0.000070226466,0.00014755836,0.0001446123,0.0000025273634,0.00000468429,0.00015280426,0.0000013044823,0.0023318331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.000028415141,0.00005763581,0.000021182677,0.0000019466597,0.0000031575084,0.000113496455,4.6424742e-7,0.0002128006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998747,0.00065342535,0.00006908346,0.00011830464,0.00017161886,0.00024059987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558204,0.0025856586,0.0012062354,0.00019799394,0.00021435035,0.00021366113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030543345,0.00014754976,0.0002697429,0.0011675439,0.0003860579,0.00096760393,0.00013811848,0.00040767764,0.004086016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008781175,0.0000955679,0.00015245998,0.0012406849,0.0005558682,0.0006291416,0.00073485926,0.0003713936,0.00031638713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015264144,0.00042209265,0.9233136,0.00013554508,0.00019065382,0.00018547942,0.0058558886,0.0059789075,0.00211417,0.021120435,0.0020709878,0.037085734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000645903,0.00028336514,0.9793904,0.00007622844,0.000056917954,0.00008822295,0.0050410433,0.0040002544,0.0010571233,0.0050967676,0.004815395,0.000029809044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005230625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073480834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005230625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078896404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000250901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016153038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416942093","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10053","title":"What can dual citizens teach us about political engagement?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Politics; Witness; Citizenship; Dual (grammatical number); Leverage (statistics); Political socialization; Democracy; Immigration","score_opus":0.19620284188490872,"score_gpt":0.5965910023620735,"score_spread":0.4003881604771648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416942093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77686626,0.00177499,0.0022438231,0.060467184,0.00046552924,0.000027577,0.00006633662,0.00003705788,0.15805128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939393,0.0005100412,0.00027773762,0.001961107,0.00007660405,0.000024156128,0.000020205425,0.000011470708,0.0031792677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537563,0.003149627,0.00005776536,0.0003521286,0.00035331384,0.0007114757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927315,0.004031341,0.000798664,0.00046137816,0.00024941415,0.0017276669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004894745,0.0002356026,0.00043757565,0.0011134482,0.0050591175,0.0077310414,0.0005769966,0.0018495691,0.015203249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010483728,0.00022041777,0.00037586706,0.00082298217,0.008244491,0.005693922,0.0065847076,0.0044577485,0.0011999118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031939097,0.0015270939,0.12525284,0.00031958905,0.000056276804,0.00073146634,0.49906543,0.000138779,0.00095379044,0.19947885,0.018270863,0.15388566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000698769,0.0002901797,0.06951933,0.001181388,0.00007216458,0.00058752287,0.5933262,0.0008013391,0.001229891,0.14801173,0.18484862,0.00006167309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017110907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004024817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015203249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018690829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014616603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05085987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}