{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d6d614a06de","filters":{"venue":"Political Science Research and Methods"},"cohort_total":33,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":33,"exported":33,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d6d614a06de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Science+Research+and+Methods"},"results":[{"id":"W2469586763","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2016.31","title":"How to Survey About Electoral Turnout? The Efficacy of the Face-Saving Response Items in 19 Different Contexts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; National election; Face (sociological concept); Null hypothesis; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Government (linguistics); Variation (astronomy); Voter turnout; Political science; Econometrics; Psychology; Public economics; Economics; Statistics; Sociology; Politics; Voting; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.2304256022767907,"score_gpt":0.5535494463615038,"score_spread":0.3231238440847131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469586763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95398366,0.00007518731,0.0009086226,0.043882776,0.00014705036,0.00058197527,0.000011238202,0.000009095415,0.00040041495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825585,0.0000041622443,0.00011045654,0.00011353758,0.000115150935,0.000036484635,1.0435487e-7,0.000004971578,0.0013592612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858864,0.01037304,0.00026392334,0.0003387956,0.0012229213,0.001914915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97947425,0.018733429,0.000039336563,0.00031890773,0.00037834363,0.0010557481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036676724,0.000096643504,0.00020934943,0.00015583212,0.00081719813,0.00026954347,0.00071522145,0.000072712304,0.000018625016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09558031,0.00004073555,0.000045513032,0.0015388287,0.0040645506,0.00018309346,0.00024311896,0.00025374064,0.0000044998105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028681033,0.00010238518,0.27667627,0.000012201354,0.0000043409063,7.9904294e-7,0.0027505942,2.8924757e-7,0.12216364,0.5780245,0.00010652976,0.019871611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018896186,0.00016395237,0.9767572,0.00007047948,0.0000014367486,3.8187645e-7,0.00036036113,0.000012570551,0.010303733,0.010256032,0.0018106491,0.00007421728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03726023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017657828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70008093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048583013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007604478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527915749","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2016.39","title":"Which Matters Most: Party Strategic Exit or Voter Strategic Voting? A Laboratory Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Competition (biology); Fragmentation (computing); Political science; Business; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.30350042534087784,"score_gpt":0.5658816801086923,"score_spread":0.2623812547678145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527915749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8550169,0.0000990042,0.0017512753,0.07808769,0.0003809845,0.00077070016,0.000027433029,0.00012334659,0.06374265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518615,0.000016708591,0.0027778624,0.0003834965,0.0003771233,0.000082079976,4.0455515e-7,0.000010030464,0.0011661358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926975,0.0021542048,0.00032318258,0.0005640675,0.0013180637,0.0029429907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947873,0.0018349041,0.000038520997,0.0002428162,0.00079038215,0.0023061258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140218185,0.00014447798,0.00022388829,0.00027139034,0.0011684002,0.00046978806,0.00041075482,0.00012522754,0.000587817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026504453,0.00008204116,0.000027137625,0.002317305,0.0038286066,0.00048517575,0.00013166528,0.00024556532,0.0000793359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023763587,0.000059806996,0.0011248082,0.000016272134,0.0000037179286,0.0000035553956,0.00029720174,4.550017e-8,0.038465064,0.9589142,0.00018088947,0.00091064157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009883823,0.0016196049,0.008577886,0.00029258043,0.000017850007,0.000008176747,0.010980942,0.00038469848,0.081150256,0.87958336,0.015561868,0.00083438406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009394249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022424508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14016925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004213745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018995135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765917772","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2017.32","title":"Turnout and Education: Is Education Proxying for Pre-Adult Experiences Within the Family?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Sibling; Census; Variety (cybernetics); Social psychology; Robustness (evolution); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Population; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31777671541438085,"score_gpt":0.6486009518530439,"score_spread":0.33082423643866304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765917772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210523,0.0006994085,0.0009074878,0.13248761,0.0013838769,0.0007507055,0.000005264764,0.00001190653,0.0427014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957112,0.000081301885,0.033314425,0.0013498435,0.0010648958,0.0007380656,7.9006475e-7,0.0000030478902,0.006335637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793833,0.00032539855,0.00016051233,0.00031899396,0.00062436005,0.0006323989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969531,0.0009446012,0.00005379888,0.00021096756,0.0014227383,0.0004147352],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009544562,0.00006777197,0.00008896989,0.0000767548,0.008878179,0.0010298619,0.00050046603,0.000038525057,0.000014042851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015282949,0.000043188153,0.000021158257,0.00017392906,0.0062149204,0.0005247967,0.00016063791,0.00013001321,0.0000017626046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063619345,0.000054684642,0.0013976832,0.00001387189,0.0000025834681,1.095893e-8,0.037748832,1.5859303e-8,0.00034885106,0.93717974,0.0011758616,0.02207149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005373781,0.00008854689,0.03599069,0.00004613554,0.0000047761678,0.0000017196356,0.27661404,0.00016015483,0.0030378122,0.6588914,0.02499183,0.000119155564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008416306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028240538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27828833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011854173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004003653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790304980","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2018.3","title":"Elites Tweet to Get Feet Off the Streets: Measuring Regime Social Media Strategies During Protest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social media; Narrative; Censorship; Rhetorical question; Media studies; Political science; Democracy; Opposition (politics); Sociology; Criticism; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.23777898043035262,"score_gpt":0.5423418810115296,"score_spread":0.30456290058117697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790304980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184624,0.00012848534,0.00025276927,0.024870122,0.00046876248,0.0006504194,0.000014936597,0.0000878235,0.05506431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883481,0.000036105685,0.007021345,0.00021020809,0.0040639224,0.000084244326,4.890611e-7,0.000012404682,0.00022313607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919854,0.0019721566,0.00025334145,0.000500284,0.0020998043,0.003189027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922916,0.004569263,0.000036891,0.00026875924,0.0010095942,0.0018238877],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454662,0.00014896315,0.00022873175,0.00025774742,0.005473239,0.0009665733,0.0010249594,0.00013273381,0.00008730659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03277966,0.000107186905,0.000047618098,0.001887322,0.015320164,0.0005010821,0.00044283728,0.00050443417,0.000042703756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001963942,0.000034779558,0.0015434126,0.000016822905,0.0000059287704,0.0000034469504,0.04161765,3.2950418e-8,0.0074243313,0.92829883,0.00014884469,0.020886282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033157374,0.00032240868,0.072494425,0.00008985327,0.00001636024,0.000005467969,0.27356005,0.000026457526,0.041084487,0.56314576,0.04846234,0.0004608194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046308963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36515307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040466624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022198386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901429828","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2018.51","title":"Maps in People’s Heads: Assessing a New Measure of Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Measure (data warehouse); Representation (politics); Social psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Power (physics); Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.17061004875804833,"score_gpt":0.5230144405054461,"score_spread":0.3524043917473978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901429828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7844532,0.0004818993,0.15921253,0.0015462281,0.0002230978,0.00029599096,0.0000047646877,0.00007050814,0.053711742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361594,0.000010070787,0.026227824,0.000034086555,0.00008134968,0.0000037580007,4.7011375e-7,0.0000040251343,0.000022455395],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985413,0.00017781105,0.00013211595,0.00013671983,0.0004006606,0.00061141077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987874,0.00042011717,0.000006215641,0.00008561745,0.00025473774,0.00044587918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046399566,0.000046086945,0.00010522619,0.00023896167,0.00008546603,0.00006745889,0.00010951737,0.00003820669,0.00004804432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023988013,0.000039831157,0.000011346451,0.0010110004,0.0007848941,0.00022069042,0.00004323347,0.00018022124,0.0000070850683],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014803762,0.000029581126,0.0047115944,0.00005327858,0.000002534525,0.000001131427,0.0006553343,0.0000013095008,0.14842884,0.1557168,0.00010101436,0.6902838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009452783,0.00048068305,0.2308044,0.00035451673,0.000004922792,0.000015310627,0.0026442448,0.038184065,0.562706,0.16198888,0.0015997026,0.00027196997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012024353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027243508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6900118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009993518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002565401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947264546","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2019.24","title":"Are election results more unpredictable? A forecasting test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Econometrics; Economics; Test (biology); Term (time); Power (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics)","score_opus":0.2884577020752932,"score_gpt":0.5701558960756319,"score_spread":0.2816981940003387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947264546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83465236,0.00005488732,0.0008304898,0.016299801,0.00030560183,0.0006604387,0.000015663782,0.000089250425,0.14709151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937595,0.0000040663695,0.0028804396,0.00013117476,0.00039515088,0.000024524628,8.4921135e-7,0.000006229136,0.0027980707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994905,0.0008443684,0.00025566097,0.00044499044,0.001168493,0.0023814936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939793,0.003704587,0.000057609905,0.00019315317,0.00064950425,0.0014158755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019070167,0.00008570683,0.00017105867,0.0002185152,0.0012590705,0.0003162056,0.00026291984,0.000100463905,0.000058682155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035782207,0.00006930598,0.000028108905,0.0016984536,0.0023137527,0.00043565844,0.000114921444,0.00036246132,0.000045292207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003211993,0.000087264496,0.07894054,0.000041395208,0.0000030293945,0.0000034134146,0.00094228465,9.603749e-7,0.008214292,0.90035784,0.00026842987,0.011108429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012847284,0.0016576316,0.473203,0.0003963165,0.000018588487,0.000022452958,0.013553564,0.016579308,0.023645362,0.40700832,0.061882056,0.0007486498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017680248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008628306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49334952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044393257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058219396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011539761","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.8","title":"Voting at 16: Does lowering the voting age lead to more political engagement? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in the city of Ghent (Belgium)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Suffrage; Leverage (statistics); Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.42817438456282914,"score_gpt":0.5892127976823313,"score_spread":0.16103841311950212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011539761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143828,0.00012299069,0.0058098724,0.076653264,0.00008843283,0.000634482,0.000005925277,0.000018197346,0.0022840346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996071,0.000003821852,0.0023691626,0.0010144891,0.00041606446,0.00006999292,4.306698e-7,0.000005985812,0.000049046197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139977,0.0034769892,0.0004417133,0.00051539217,0.0018221687,0.002343949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899948,0.008253441,0.00004294193,0.00022545482,0.00021784155,0.0012655059],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022697048,0.00012560483,0.00025286345,0.00008967227,0.0013330436,0.00029844185,0.00085258717,0.0000646109,0.00006595467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027183281,0.00006786551,0.00005709514,0.0012993547,0.0030386685,0.0002492673,0.00059238327,0.0005088608,0.000008326568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031685628,0.00008764868,0.04033091,0.000037095368,0.000004851981,0.000006572354,0.021802386,0.0000013532134,0.027406208,0.90812117,0.000023966611,0.0021461677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000823602,0.0024289042,0.43010265,0.0012317037,0.00005869884,0.000003885332,0.13939138,0.006337958,0.307658,0.103808746,0.007077698,0.0010768024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084136955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037517287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066113874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034915886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025393907","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.18","title":"Placebo statements in list experiments: Evidence from a face-to-face survey in Singapore","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Treatment and control groups; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Placebo; Inflation (cosmology); Interpretation (philosophy); Statement (logic); Survey data collection; Social psychology; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Alternative medicine; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.7576034810771761,"score_gpt":0.6772032127523472,"score_spread":0.08040026832482894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025393907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83496374,0.00007879937,0.16149397,0.0024708037,0.000028623175,0.0004904058,0.000028114413,0.00005268044,0.00039282985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316325,0.0000147852925,0.2681306,0.00011938333,0.000014876171,0.000051811312,0.0000020881334,0.0000075632383,0.00002643237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994758,0.0022220267,0.000390425,0.0005750349,0.00085845834,0.0011960163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98879385,0.009783581,0.000028786479,0.00024560225,0.00019255899,0.00095559185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02698747,0.000117528754,0.00025688703,0.00028823956,0.00014026371,0.00020288311,0.00048587756,0.000058112313,0.000049124374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08303034,0.0001015385,0.000013748775,0.0016354091,0.0006014148,0.0004009557,0.00043995903,0.0003770988,0.0000118462085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018086192,0.0013794058,0.54600155,0.0005100414,0.000029111172,0.00011242067,0.041644156,0.000044058528,0.19076912,0.13483232,0.0019769073,0.08089229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010823335,0.0008984194,0.27341846,0.0010166074,0.0000036103934,0.0000024100975,0.005431377,0.02003367,0.2822681,0.415054,0.000174991,0.0006160445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01154804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029619393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28022167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029569786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030079772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034271659","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.21","title":"Betting on the underdog: the influence of social networks on vote choice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Voting; Homogeneity (statistics); Microeconomics; Social network (sociolinguistics); Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social media; Machine learning","score_opus":0.3161378258146733,"score_gpt":0.5836273683340438,"score_spread":0.2674895425193705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034271659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78940845,0.000016739465,0.00074655126,0.18778315,0.00004696321,0.000342691,0.000002110901,0.00001851673,0.02163483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968402,0.0000019433378,0.00016363982,0.0023261753,0.0005691056,0.000017886374,1.11369445e-7,0.0000038060286,0.00007715884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947163,0.002386988,0.00019307427,0.00024925263,0.0011088662,0.0013455153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900029,0.008891507,0.000037640064,0.00012992085,0.00028555648,0.00065249205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013852759,0.00007024613,0.0001263587,0.00004137403,0.002502779,0.00018293015,0.0005214218,0.00006358225,0.00001878588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020221014,0.000036954334,0.000035041434,0.0012227991,0.0052481545,0.0001173584,0.00012289805,0.00051331846,0.000007995671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008996531,0.000014865112,0.0011166288,0.0000057326947,0.0000021395629,2.1282158e-7,0.0010404796,0.000023890942,0.0009437685,0.993732,0.00008699498,0.003024293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038545742,0.0019463117,0.528208,0.00014545849,0.00002289392,8.313193e-7,0.0064816754,0.0113513395,0.009334387,0.40420157,0.037472963,0.00044910677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009032667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029822937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5895304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011675408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033584563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037341367","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.25","title":"Do natural disasters help the environment? How voters respond and what that means","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Voting; Referendum; Climate change; Flooding (psychology); Flood myth; Exploit; Extreme weather; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Geospatial analysis; Politics; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.24071952653239828,"score_gpt":0.5179058000293262,"score_spread":0.2771862734969279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037341367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6311852,0.0010779089,0.001590478,0.36263013,0.0002018692,0.00052616955,0.0000046138766,0.000027709822,0.0027559143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971041,0.00013534227,0.0013455779,0.0007884304,0.00023494962,0.000019294313,4.293428e-7,0.0000052972273,0.00036657427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461174,0.002047898,0.00011575276,0.00041160174,0.001161719,0.0016512644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958672,0.0021635112,0.000020901824,0.00015452893,0.00007833029,0.0017155488],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009479968,0.00009586483,0.00014375718,0.00006674754,0.0014497701,0.00175736,0.00036069105,0.000059559945,0.00003792651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004144168,0.000059482933,0.000029903615,0.0005365626,0.0071317097,0.001131052,0.00022824315,0.000362121,0.000010052263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025476538,0.000014936606,0.002822528,0.000018360968,0.0000051839984,0.0000026821951,0.007283951,2.121784e-7,0.009275303,0.937318,0.00009985459,0.04313346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011128782,0.0018093511,0.08492684,0.00022266828,0.000057612342,0.00001354564,0.2478613,0.004638193,0.039399877,0.3608686,0.2579263,0.0011628316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020115501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013352228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57644945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015696409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018525893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049205357","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.30","title":"Transformed-likelihood estimators for dynamic panel models with a very small <i>T</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Panel data; Extremum estimator; Econometrics; M-estimator; Mathematics; Random effects model; Fixed effects model; Statistics; Invariant estimator; Efficient estimator; Minimum-variance unbiased estimator","score_opus":0.2946374840912235,"score_gpt":0.42196148940358674,"score_spread":0.12732400531236326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049205357","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042115793,0.00034828653,0.9434775,0.007099485,0.000033676333,0.00033879306,0.00027549334,0.000026682173,0.0062842616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82403165,0.000094133626,0.1751894,0.0005089458,0.00004885952,0.00006379815,0.000009981572,0.00001216586,0.000041057992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751014,0.000050742623,0.0002871134,0.0006253647,0.00013631381,0.0013903256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783134,0.0005402363,0.000033978715,0.00019947598,0.000120723365,0.0012742268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003971625,0.000118379656,0.00033389617,0.00024110715,0.00034799817,0.00020353132,0.0004201026,0.00005686662,0.000032800952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010840307,0.00009648274,0.000062092826,0.0010700165,0.0009897423,0.00036829812,0.00009582178,0.0002180992,0.000020080213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007884905,0.00004541911,0.0016505506,0.00008176271,0.000021488931,0.0000026517052,0.00029742467,0.000023127519,0.0003509846,0.9815334,0.000015019454,0.015899325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047333533,0.00065330503,0.0015313177,0.000012655168,0.000010912803,0.000005013479,0.00026748658,0.35503063,0.0010349352,0.6382819,0.002481504,0.00021700069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010214424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056820656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78191584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009462022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019851173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39344522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123162206","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2020.38","title":"How responsive is Trade Adjustment Assistance?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Free trade; Voting; International economics; Presidential election; Politics; Liberalization; Economic integration; Development economics; International trade; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.3243835393476171,"score_gpt":0.5869592112514462,"score_spread":0.26257567190382913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123162206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011618182,0.00053407945,0.0011271044,0.84102273,0.00020079933,0.00041870325,0.00001294599,0.00006555152,0.14499992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974143,0.0008938406,0.015380701,0.0058224136,0.0017639671,0.000041828927,2.3590506e-7,0.000008518643,0.0019454513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949566,0.0011678173,0.00012136755,0.0004269908,0.0013218026,0.0020054304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613696,0.0013909532,0.000021251266,0.00011774131,0.00022424958,0.0021088477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076304246,0.0000932671,0.00019347011,0.00011260288,0.0024686863,0.00032261867,0.0004219131,0.00008784973,0.000032084234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015475815,0.00006704215,0.000050303115,0.0016258273,0.009746763,0.00033849414,0.00023960651,0.0003789308,0.000007601757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023687744,0.00002030875,0.00011504789,0.000010463349,0.000006481346,0.0000029198677,0.013704663,5.1106004e-9,0.001860661,0.94961184,0.00094439375,0.033699512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037658322,0.00057143037,0.02721986,0.00002111597,0.000012962157,0.0000017029843,0.12087447,0.00006458494,0.017157005,0.64720786,0.18616496,0.00032745753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010895315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006090275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96252483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024221263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009463391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165696130","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.10","title":"The best at the top? Candidate ranking strategies under closed list proportional representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Proportional representation; Incentive; Legislature; Competence (human resources); Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Order (exchange); Political science; Public relations; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Management","score_opus":0.2597051134036285,"score_gpt":0.6149408002078486,"score_spread":0.3552356868042201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165696130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75252545,0.0015215084,0.0057959678,0.14102854,0.0008380914,0.0010086122,0.000012573621,0.00008863699,0.09718064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949907,0.00003794205,0.00030031137,0.0000726206,0.00047253788,0.000056924073,0.00000159259,0.0000045447982,0.0040628393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952741,0.0015428397,0.00020516581,0.00030940684,0.0012739833,0.0013944634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948835,0.0040930333,0.000017405198,0.0001764948,0.00031431732,0.00051527756],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017659247,0.000066866196,0.00008225708,0.00007390305,0.004414321,0.001793101,0.00028693018,0.00005104786,0.00010800502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030123654,0.000033850712,0.00003404129,0.0010487252,0.0065350244,0.00042474957,0.00013739789,0.0002899383,0.000030119267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078410285,0.00000914281,0.0010867205,0.000008733867,0.000004152767,0.0000012493584,0.00048680158,0.0000010944815,0.0019454524,0.9858731,0.00013504722,0.010440666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006634945,0.00008483858,0.016795099,0.000037470927,0.0000090747435,0.0000032390255,0.0069395364,0.0008544579,0.0025724457,0.93281794,0.039720323,0.00009925362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034917105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074252165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24246524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043510325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013816712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175973093","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.24","title":"Are voters' views about proportional outcomes shaped by partisan preferences? A survey experiment in the context of a real election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Proportional representation; General election; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Political science; Survey data collection; Economics; Public administration; Public economics; Microeconomics; Law; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.41226343439738633,"score_gpt":0.6054310415336063,"score_spread":0.19316760713621994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175973093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98737615,0.00018612058,0.0004080723,0.0059231715,0.00007567338,0.0004183403,0.00001785413,0.000008879473,0.005585717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.000027845628,0.000515725,0.00016125797,0.000050847837,0.00010230144,0.0000037441196,0.0000026967944,0.0002418824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916213,0.005317091,0.00035722327,0.00032184814,0.0012040611,0.0011784551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965956,0.0021256458,0.000074274576,0.00015249985,0.0005645227,0.0004874255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02059403,0.00007731008,0.00022799218,0.000086464235,0.000511811,0.0001696919,0.0002480107,0.000069886024,0.00008811811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009767903,0.000049709455,0.000034204397,0.0011224989,0.0021927103,0.00019363481,0.00006304556,0.00023213043,0.0000028820289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021904763,0.00027506147,0.37515444,0.000021916883,0.0000050194617,0.0000023294908,0.0030840198,2.7935943e-8,0.014478659,0.60143477,0.00020491656,0.0053169583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015986037,0.00015214286,0.95850116,0.000032960783,0.0000027408405,0.0000010572488,0.006556542,0.00009319251,0.010448584,0.022699144,0.0012628783,0.00008973148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076567054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030294068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5833467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022532683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082507875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185989073","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.43","title":"Misattributed blame? Attitudes toward globalization in the age of automation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Blame; Globalization; Immigration; Polarization (electrochemistry); Job loss; Economics; Economic inequality; Labour economics; Inequality; Development economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Social psychology; Psychology; Market economy; Law; Unemployment","score_opus":0.36774677675284545,"score_gpt":0.6462130885628508,"score_spread":0.2784663118100053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185989073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85946155,0.00064251013,0.019377902,0.061288584,0.00023105669,0.0008583152,0.000018611787,0.000040826533,0.058080673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919051,0.00009297239,0.0073752166,0.00032453093,0.000054937005,0.000036478927,0.000005403229,0.0000021952671,0.00020319803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575675,0.0023675512,0.00023132787,0.00019130015,0.0006010463,0.0008520083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676543,0.0024101965,0.000021906893,0.0001501984,0.0005171634,0.00013512874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013212485,0.000047598045,0.00013231825,0.00011196626,0.00059819006,0.00002554165,0.00018929497,0.000048591468,0.000055367676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091154035,0.000029545969,0.000015560448,0.001353718,0.0010467687,0.00010943265,0.00024795224,0.00026205758,0.000004173983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006465905,0.00006780378,0.16233934,0.0001297436,0.0000031059856,0.000005397226,0.0022289702,1.6944124e-7,0.006009318,0.82529384,0.00023256594,0.003683296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018128927,0.00006239682,0.9087067,0.00008114806,0.0000026987864,0.0000010321729,0.005190265,0.00011101803,0.0020371766,0.08124701,0.002339279,0.000039990337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091916526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013380848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74636734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013194671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004820953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186935905","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.41","title":"Hypothesis testing with error correction models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Bivariate analysis; Null hypothesis; Error detection and correction; Econometrics; Mathematics; Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Error correction model; Order (exchange); Null (SQL); Type I and type II errors; Statistical hypothesis testing; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.5716359837438698,"score_gpt":0.4538477963276327,"score_spread":0.11778818741623709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186935905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60304976,0.0005436031,0.060803927,0.004396669,0.00026545383,0.00019869673,0.000035361438,0.000045131703,0.3306614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84054124,0.000022593047,0.15794085,0.00019501171,0.000087742934,0.000011363632,4.3038762e-7,0.000008013635,0.0011927697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977438,0.00010054099,0.00024182818,0.0005263994,0.00008470458,0.0013027302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743557,0.0014535249,0.00003929318,0.00026569032,0.00009143563,0.00071447965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062510455,0.00008752465,0.00022694039,0.000272614,0.00045923522,0.00022931352,0.00017801567,0.000048290076,0.000145544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062624277,0.0000796575,0.00002468095,0.0008488827,0.00095564715,0.0005031246,0.00012538012,0.0002516356,0.00006676035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019855861,0.00008294135,0.009036782,0.000022267492,0.000013862519,0.000010450921,0.00019762278,0.00025930145,0.00070735253,0.9561208,0.00013811649,0.03339068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018477999,0.00020327012,0.026765918,0.000017414295,0.0000020081127,0.00008975537,0.0003034446,0.21317998,0.004944307,0.7530556,0.001080906,0.000172662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024564152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026569971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3294686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018952972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001775908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74971634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225287051","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.19","title":"Belief in territorial indivisibility and public preferences for dispute resolution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Negotiation; China; Dispute resolution; Territorial dispute; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1686199981946572,"score_gpt":0.529223394189552,"score_spread":0.36060339599489477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225287051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98177314,0.00015959416,0.00065223745,0.010567799,0.00040855445,0.00051932543,0.000039513063,0.000013289668,0.0058665276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209243,0.00007958743,0.007152182,0.000048864877,0.00031657316,0.00014094348,0.0000012516314,0.000002836065,0.00016535209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963897,0.0008808381,0.00018534284,0.00045704655,0.0006968061,0.0013902587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776024,0.0013540016,0.000032127293,0.0001329165,0.00010586301,0.00061485684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027710546,0.00006115872,0.00014037093,0.00015564084,0.0021249037,0.0002893109,0.0003968325,0.000046117864,0.000035115052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061676768,0.000050599272,0.00002324511,0.00055302604,0.0033494732,0.0005083552,0.0005124856,0.00034380317,3.9841163e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024862804,0.000072927876,0.034724932,0.000010876911,0.0000013817371,3.2013028e-7,0.0034625987,2.0562867e-7,0.00011816591,0.91144055,0.000058532936,0.05008465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003126798,0.00028486102,0.17570367,0.000004803277,0.0000010172793,8.361249e-7,0.0084565235,0.00038971347,0.00006299149,0.7760423,0.038642183,0.00009844485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022260683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003170123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14097874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087616744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011624071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234871730","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2021.18","title":"Am I obliged to vote? A regression discontinuity analysis of compulsory voting with ill-informed voters","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Regression discontinuity design; Confusion; Demographic economics; Political science; Disapproval voting; Economics; Psychology; Law; Statistics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.17876924653877574,"score_gpt":0.5722743040760119,"score_spread":0.39350505753723614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234871730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96966064,0.00003129136,0.013087428,0.0073162625,0.000055831053,0.0002401538,0.0000068409367,0.000020389654,0.009581141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98067605,0.0000023905284,0.018582093,0.00013567563,0.000072847164,0.00001472361,0.00000189421,0.0000038622934,0.0005104631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948412,0.0014481196,0.00030136298,0.00039220118,0.0013425837,0.0016744934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945738,0.002219913,0.000048053585,0.00021245136,0.0012529586,0.0016928746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010478465,0.0000912666,0.00034503115,0.00046110037,0.0008483981,0.00021715222,0.0002665003,0.000065121705,0.00002327246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013732786,0.000062749335,0.00006197174,0.0054867407,0.002646317,0.00027154328,0.00018440383,0.00022180752,0.0000018701062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003653183,0.00008192061,0.06545593,0.000036735662,0.00004644383,0.0000054605684,0.0033503775,0.0000073728806,0.01703379,0.89727676,0.000026471052,0.016642233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047022733,0.00080641545,0.88917667,0.0003868778,0.00020353703,0.0000036831364,0.01359677,0.0051776757,0.06333752,0.022549007,0.0037766872,0.0005149167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022473203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014182777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031050012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012697834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99457496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281659893","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.21","title":"The politics of accountability in Supreme Court nominations: voter recall and assessment of senator votes on nominees","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Supreme court; Politics; Accountability; Political science; Law; Voting; Representation (politics); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21496461037456688,"score_gpt":0.5925137629530368,"score_spread":0.37754915257846994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281659893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762265,0.000069399226,0.00012601643,0.014720832,0.00007656853,0.00034891043,0.000020014213,0.0000047256144,0.008407044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972677,0.000012766799,0.002387995,0.000048272177,0.00004625011,0.00005313853,4.258679e-7,0.0000028386482,0.00018059112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995237,0.0021703488,0.00032512055,0.00023297721,0.001060905,0.00097368466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230546,0.0067202584,0.000044004493,0.00016992545,0.00036046992,0.000399891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02453821,0.00005833725,0.00016464129,0.00017190474,0.0011046638,0.00007376768,0.000267965,0.000036261736,0.000028358818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006789437,0.000041898613,0.000021997492,0.00072085037,0.004082002,0.00012816177,0.0002087345,0.0003127768,2.3189125e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001011603,0.00009702171,0.031705376,0.000017597979,0.0000017647105,1.6377665e-7,0.00059592223,0.0000010388807,0.0015985343,0.96308094,0.000014168369,0.0028773313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025946705,0.0007687703,0.50102895,0.00003129327,0.000005364886,0.0000011453316,0.007596185,0.0026622433,0.004434706,0.4768804,0.0062070903,0.00012436902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032296576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014297147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48620054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004795398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088091975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303413633","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.46","title":"Explaining women's political underrepresentation in democracies with high levels of corruption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; McGill University; Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"Coastal Response Research Center, University of New Hampshire; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Vignette; Language change; Politics; Democracy; Representation (politics); Political science; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2847427520885681,"score_gpt":0.560821165359426,"score_spread":0.27607841327085797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303413633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9645152,0.000017663779,0.004449909,0.0050878054,0.000108038636,0.00029404194,0.00001217797,0.000016448788,0.025498731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900087,0.000006081605,0.009429779,0.00007891184,0.000061925726,0.00008769564,0.0000013787718,0.0000058375394,0.00031965302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936969,0.0019750036,0.00023883657,0.0003765017,0.0017142256,0.001998496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970149,0.0016813852,0.000039317667,0.00015899818,0.000296314,0.0008090843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436632,0.00007369459,0.00016557418,0.0005541338,0.0013390888,0.00011334025,0.0003057897,0.000038723425,0.00018726414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024840636,0.00006418637,0.00001721535,0.001650702,0.0039896625,0.00031720905,0.00030297993,0.00036323525,0.0000010471281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025639849,0.000080371974,0.008995208,0.000014555672,0.000002586757,0.0000043596942,0.007173485,0.000016102716,0.0026603574,0.97783446,0.0000024942324,0.003190359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034578942,0.00037980493,0.14993626,0.000010810027,0.0000025672232,0.00000811216,0.25122067,0.00044564123,0.0042413566,0.59313923,0.0001586924,0.00011105862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012223928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016275307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38469526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009323766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013303484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304172327","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.51","title":"Equation balance in time series analysis: lessons learned and lessons needed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Confusion; Series (stratigraphy); Contradiction; Balance (ability); Econometrics; Monte Carlo method; Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.2612345217914732,"score_gpt":0.4671045514189034,"score_spread":0.20587002962743017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304172327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82327074,0.0039388356,0.029306984,0.09373743,0.00015158662,0.00066083734,0.00033744072,0.00006694773,0.04852921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990867,0.000091875874,0.006409838,0.00006860647,0.000027028307,0.000059154725,0.000005696047,0.0000061441633,0.0024646672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974701,0.0003414248,0.0003706471,0.00060381484,0.00023021085,0.0009837953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987583,0.00043203146,0.000065969,0.0002805914,0.00006752784,0.00039559221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014399709,0.0000902941,0.00041631455,0.0012330407,0.0008171666,0.00030126565,0.0003381277,0.00003184836,0.00063463056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012571636,0.00009437797,0.0000591473,0.004203572,0.00082136196,0.00030613638,0.000624436,0.0003028271,0.000018155468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015053508,0.000043627835,0.015559671,0.000008934747,0.0000305174,0.0000021959938,0.00023386395,0.000035873396,0.00041287145,0.9806766,0.000016193626,0.0029646337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037442066,0.0002747861,0.1475271,0.000006948824,0.000021947793,0.000009806137,0.0036198534,0.11165007,0.00022203413,0.7227537,0.013242603,0.0002967512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006959514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011323376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2579229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024289069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008991983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309938065","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.57","title":"Is compulsory voting a solution to low and declining turnout? Cross-national evidence since 1945","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Demographic economics; Political science; Voter turnout; Sanctions; Legislation; Single-member district; Economics; Public economics; Group voting ticket; Law; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4358149035367635,"score_gpt":0.6424060597390561,"score_spread":0.20659115620229257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309938065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93281335,0.00030029225,0.014094544,0.045903336,0.00030310595,0.0005493038,0.000016979271,0.00005066512,0.005968454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883503,0.000005088147,0.010007724,0.0008200378,0.00031053723,0.000062167885,5.479892e-7,0.0000047885737,0.00043882403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936391,0.0018325044,0.0002653982,0.00049543445,0.0020091697,0.0017583692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943894,0.0033745845,0.0000340328,0.00010362288,0.00065367005,0.0014446679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03210624,0.00007939731,0.00014513833,0.00023220923,0.0042946865,0.00048047866,0.00033131035,0.00004385652,0.00008836725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018679522,0.00007531054,0.000025507261,0.0013485227,0.0023607856,0.0004728551,0.00051952107,0.0003861179,0.000013795389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022757766,0.00004546234,0.032752786,0.000029348854,0.000002298589,0.0000016502461,0.0028269195,0.000013853497,0.0033726539,0.95239806,0.000121916666,0.008412313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006059047,0.001725305,0.55660784,0.00043749728,0.000014653073,0.00003051727,0.0055353395,0.055369765,0.005474533,0.33392015,0.039384153,0.00089430023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01248666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036397425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6184779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071714923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001126992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156190","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2022.60","title":"The effects of proposal power on incumbents' vote share: updated results from a naturally occurring experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lottery; Legislature; Cabinet (room); Parliament; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Politics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.08635897248053681,"score_gpt":0.5286014793420357,"score_spread":0.4422425068614989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97971123,0.00020547662,0.00007807179,0.0073631015,0.00052468956,0.0007389779,0.000043718395,0.000030302193,0.0113044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984011,0.0000030359477,0.0009839218,0.0001264547,0.000101552876,0.00008438621,0.0000026749449,0.000004750597,0.00029212818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293363,0.003067522,0.000283423,0.0003749695,0.0018162243,0.0015242321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348503,0.005181381,0.000049264876,0.00023994556,0.00027408788,0.00077031227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013391642,0.000082067985,0.00014503539,0.00010540041,0.002800269,0.00019553983,0.00055346626,0.000042630603,0.000043675613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013246713,0.00005443541,0.00003491279,0.000915203,0.002364219,0.0001458959,0.000409556,0.0004629175,0.0000037049683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012247248,0.00009596228,0.00049800565,0.0000064109913,0.000006294716,0.0000032687701,0.0018626119,4.2554612e-7,0.018393762,0.9754957,0.0002826716,0.003232406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022236612,0.0059794546,0.06284387,0.0002118061,0.00002249643,0.0000030346248,0.01140468,0.0011302659,0.2843044,0.548832,0.082333,0.00071130006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032578908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038418075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4266637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000479722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007910133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391842841","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.1","title":"Attitudes toward automation and the demand for policies addressing job loss: the effects of information about trade-offs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Washington; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Job loss; Economics; Automation; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Engineering; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.195040786107986,"score_gpt":0.6009483622078439,"score_spread":0.40590757609985784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391842841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73958653,0.009678847,0.059123535,0.17102095,0.000959376,0.0052633923,0.000036640115,0.00015094584,0.014179808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630135,0.00044719508,0.0024256017,0.00032498513,0.00014327644,0.00024220093,7.754806e-7,0.0000036915112,0.00011089767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974301,0.0009866697,0.00024915533,0.00013013268,0.0004228935,0.00078103354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98439866,0.015133035,0.00002952592,0.00010682403,0.00016911785,0.00016280737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014008179,0.00006980462,0.000154893,0.00015097058,0.0019323298,0.00014687651,0.00016968878,0.0000494056,0.000004700448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008187312,0.0000310755,0.000029325158,0.0004206173,0.0036127765,0.00040142785,0.00023249272,0.00029504142,0.0000018319034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029003575,0.0000055231967,0.0035796405,0.0017310802,0.000013252985,1.3062143e-7,0.011039003,6.818605e-8,0.00044678274,0.9422072,0.000347737,0.040600576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009466651,0.00030852982,0.6773036,0.0012248724,0.00004263179,0.0000033757858,0.0065991418,0.0034666255,0.0025866535,0.295929,0.011471898,0.00011699354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052808697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015907848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67372394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066514054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002806894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403001460","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.54","title":"Does vote buying undermine confidence in ballot secrecy? Theory and experimental evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Secrecy; Ballot; Economics; Political science; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.28370327674977197,"score_gpt":0.624538513059803,"score_spread":0.34083523631003104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403001460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95750666,0.004174339,0.009357261,0.0155004235,0.00045796455,0.0005920568,0.000003514876,0.000086248576,0.012321508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704576,0.000064983025,0.0015908101,0.00010217659,0.00021148432,0.00003998229,1.3817113e-7,0.0000056108474,0.000939062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943598,0.002468757,0.00022041638,0.00049628905,0.00082658586,0.0016281367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99113584,0.0075237807,0.00001020501,0.000116360505,0.00013402605,0.001079788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030518051,0.00009162043,0.00015614429,0.00025079612,0.0006673519,0.00064816535,0.00023685572,0.00007544208,0.00006879122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010330561,0.00005743205,0.00001992684,0.0010299209,0.005025753,0.000756387,0.00017642064,0.00033208873,0.000008119285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013298111,0.00001733373,0.0015604412,0.000040640003,0.0000014427617,0.000008810421,0.0015415053,8.5005006e-8,0.028262168,0.96268195,0.0000044254375,0.0058678915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008564156,0.00022128547,0.008709681,0.0004834085,0.000003949764,0.000005549934,0.005103574,0.0012548323,0.031109376,0.9513712,0.0014750555,0.0001764323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025235837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017101205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03953907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038358552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073893956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403469348","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2024.52","title":"The national network of US state legislators on Twitter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.2520658780797021,"score_gpt":0.6133919389758271,"score_spread":0.361326060896125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403469348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5061925,0.0009134757,0.0009429279,0.049367595,0.0023388334,0.00048253825,0.000016037182,0.00007331685,0.43967274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944852,0.00015864329,0.0023507415,0.00031643396,0.0010207857,0.000015457676,1.4598137e-7,0.000004563449,0.0016480293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955058,0.0009974077,0.00014161138,0.00020779684,0.001640327,0.0015070238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891384,0.0096619865,0.000010877957,0.00007855614,0.00043614997,0.0006739823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017693352,0.00005279242,0.00008872239,0.00009050943,0.0013660773,0.00032877075,0.00033131734,0.000045401783,0.000027640835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010819587,0.00003313446,0.000032354812,0.0012495394,0.008418661,0.00012498304,0.00009414301,0.0003231343,0.000016296979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004256869,0.000008389175,0.0007156526,0.000005733182,0.0000035800392,9.812946e-7,0.0018149031,4.0749157e-7,0.00015688293,0.97679865,0.0011089781,0.01938158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025196005,0.000078419136,0.002698272,0.000023194898,0.0000014571376,4.6644303e-7,0.0016256648,0.00013835165,0.0012790377,0.7234708,0.27061546,0.000043671553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002135915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007968939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48829266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025811367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019862286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409439245","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.19","title":"Reassessing World Bank conditionality: beyond count measures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1988634726657897,"score_gpt":0.6044226772035658,"score_spread":0.4055592045377761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409439245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007638427,0.0001301877,0.0049434714,0.042915683,0.00030574578,0.00015368182,0.0000049607197,0.000030379106,0.94387746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499557,0.000049753613,0.029575408,0.0009397633,0.00019169808,0.000025239455,0.000002034257,0.0000028922368,0.019257534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960475,0.0007744601,0.00016237918,0.00031718024,0.0015195286,0.001178949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963167,0.002101033,0.00001569748,0.000100651545,0.0009279272,0.0005380057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022599481,0.00006501683,0.00011092192,0.0005337493,0.0020557523,0.0005481267,0.0004022826,0.00004192879,0.00021635128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076243286,0.000055145938,0.000024125926,0.0017276361,0.0051116217,0.00048362307,0.00018265005,0.0002606262,0.000014254749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053761237,0.000025252217,0.002376962,0.000005907839,0.0000045464562,0.000001718238,0.00017528694,3.261854e-8,0.0012053765,0.9805093,0.00053246674,0.015157769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007708853,0.0000109361845,0.036971767,0.00003919951,0.0000021774958,5.4834146e-7,0.00088098884,0.000035176006,0.003231782,0.8059121,0.15276954,0.00006870289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020081387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045446248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94231725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054378936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027514147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411613247","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10022","title":"The value of dignity appeals: evidence from a social media experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Dignity; Value (mathematics); Social media; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.3605461873580664,"score_gpt":0.6342577987349004,"score_spread":0.27371161137683403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411613247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92113084,0.0047948337,0.00079827756,0.023684017,0.00049579336,0.0005190789,0.000021906115,0.000031389085,0.048523847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900205,0.0004288226,0.00913996,0.000048740683,0.00011106028,0.00005934364,1.578366e-7,0.0000025340094,0.00018889103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606884,0.0013852287,0.00023796846,0.00034509212,0.00075594767,0.0012069477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898302,0.00927243,0.000031799973,0.00017815597,0.00028809314,0.00039932356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016735135,0.00007500622,0.0001834406,0.00010377926,0.0030391698,0.00017949688,0.0007358296,0.000054150558,0.000019188868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131335305,0.000052997853,0.000041895575,0.00074177666,0.012793917,0.0002426097,0.00075460196,0.00022037105,0.000003684188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018193901,0.00004427321,0.0014716657,0.0000032568466,0.0000052085365,3.1814898e-7,0.00921204,1.3974302e-8,0.02810049,0.93762237,0.00010059112,0.023421599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016419071,0.000085388056,0.029626936,0.00007836637,0.000009553366,1.0629061e-7,0.09204587,0.000053618773,0.25255787,0.62195075,0.0032928018,0.0001345342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021510083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076680735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3156716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067889516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010052033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412166017","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10032","title":"Legislative reciprocity: Using a proposal lottery to identify causal effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lottery; Legislature; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.24765137323634376,"score_gpt":0.6410554643837668,"score_spread":0.39340409114742303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412166017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103205,0.000101562604,0.0752427,0.023658266,0.00066494656,0.0015045266,0.0000040051887,0.00007787242,0.08842561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96969116,0.0000017156873,0.028157007,0.0003883373,0.00026810542,0.000057006087,2.1880213e-7,0.0000048613897,0.0014316005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362135,0.0024020278,0.00022303959,0.00046523812,0.0009945681,0.0022937933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952013,0.0024942881,0.000018327924,0.00017697028,0.0006125621,0.0014965697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01701452,0.00009711093,0.00020733094,0.00042012692,0.0016768337,0.00047531488,0.00032433012,0.0000963665,0.000020208603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017218921,0.00008037396,0.000031040145,0.0025388051,0.003222728,0.00039252153,0.0002653381,0.0003236436,0.000020009049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012549797,0.000036175843,0.0036635716,0.000039453134,0.0000045566117,0.0000028889626,0.00097431004,2.3654646e-7,0.03382693,0.9523159,0.00007906453,0.0090443315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024487142,0.0004122,0.06135033,0.00027030037,0.000018509261,0.0000020640812,0.001228789,0.00067136076,0.046626713,0.8783551,0.010545711,0.00027408433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03485903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011430666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15937063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007291643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021782988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413085861","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10029","title":"Government ideology and support for redistribution among the wealthy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideology; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15582285467937346,"score_gpt":0.5903588336145149,"score_spread":0.43453597893514145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413085861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44389135,0.00038005871,0.109746195,0.22093797,0.0009399845,0.0028259126,0.000058662477,0.00006963663,0.22115023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962684,0.000011190103,0.0015134593,0.0002808209,0.00011943161,0.00010294301,6.4986256e-7,0.0000015509887,0.0017015566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968627,0.00087672455,0.00015803278,0.00024185154,0.00053612684,0.0013245578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599814,0.0030479147,0.000017055158,0.00010957954,0.00024274302,0.00058458647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020066705,0.00004805661,0.00010293701,0.000045604807,0.0017153325,0.00015977716,0.00018170102,0.000065722554,0.000015258389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011428147,0.00003165104,0.00001751296,0.0005191083,0.005822113,0.0001355126,0.000115505776,0.00015828386,0.0000011743634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008392781,0.000012532829,0.0074588,0.000015467856,0.000001751296,1.4339442e-7,0.00014470457,1.4212549e-8,0.0006217884,0.9816073,0.00021513701,0.009913938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015078756,0.0002540309,0.13652931,0.000017463837,0.000007490341,5.5536265e-7,0.0012686088,0.00044629024,0.0031910564,0.81309086,0.044979483,0.00006404343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005326831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007230105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55237705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003645346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057511206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413741140","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10037","title":"On the political consequences of local deliberative governance in China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Rochester; American Political Science Association","keywords":"China; Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.07095715410475366,"score_gpt":0.518614871106864,"score_spread":0.4476577170021103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413741140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.560523,0.00019968303,0.0026091414,0.0959014,0.00013457202,0.0003342612,0.000013094735,0.000009498984,0.3402754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674326,0.00011111811,0.0015727062,0.00068364537,0.000039160503,0.000022058948,8.794519e-8,0.0000023145174,0.00082565617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962924,0.00091864273,0.00024908464,0.00034632825,0.0006825552,0.0015109872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949586,0.0042076837,0.00003719824,0.00020151996,0.00016964122,0.0004253658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011949502,0.00008539406,0.00020406152,0.00010081932,0.00074531493,0.00011698129,0.0006033579,0.00007378949,0.00008506192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088105975,0.000051601404,0.000038689996,0.0009818019,0.021408234,0.0002204918,0.00019565162,0.00047179288,0.0000042648517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001703756,0.000044592518,0.0012056011,0.0000075626417,0.0000023518505,0.0000013810006,0.0007808417,7.1395226e-7,0.00026068286,0.98624074,0.00007102851,0.011367444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117950905,0.00008727084,0.044869144,0.00006439279,0.000001026679,5.604751e-7,0.006646217,0.00015709561,0.009110722,0.9375795,0.0013056956,0.000060405608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037934173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014176535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43622032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082972343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00217176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414142515","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10018","title":"Inequality, information, and income tax policy preferences in Austria and Germany","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Harvard University","keywords":"Status quo; Progressive tax; Redistribution (election); Inequality; Preference; Tax policy; Economic inequality; Status quo bias; State income tax","score_opus":0.2154974265237034,"score_gpt":0.6055336778585797,"score_spread":0.3900362513348763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414142515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347129,0.00012931818,0.00072614884,0.02668649,0.00006189937,0.00036550086,0.0000067658484,0.000019217461,0.0372918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977842,0.00005790197,0.001472933,0.00022596557,0.00007651695,0.000029895918,4.1275047e-7,0.0000012463877,0.00035094866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656475,0.0012030392,0.0002931334,0.00021227749,0.000512489,0.0012142994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971979,0.0015978666,0.000023260818,0.000103636055,0.00029119375,0.0007861015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014815475,0.000069804526,0.00016038792,0.0005792994,0.00068752596,0.00043761943,0.0001799692,0.00008991908,0.000012589884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013639103,0.000055906374,0.000009014114,0.0017617748,0.0034904922,0.0007734952,0.0002455616,0.00024366856,0.0000029487749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005369871,0.000011110059,0.056580078,0.000038140246,0.000001110188,1.9036723e-7,0.0007351267,3.5894313e-8,0.00016887285,0.9216093,0.000016798323,0.020833908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014385558,0.00006651782,0.3853201,0.000045937606,0.0000015308225,5.2481676e-7,0.00085921295,0.00013021902,0.0002739123,0.6073518,0.005739022,0.00006739862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122389786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004162063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32874003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025384247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012591518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416942093","doi":"10.1017/psrm.2025.10053","title":"What can dual citizens teach us about political engagement?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Research and Methods","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Politics; Witness; Citizenship; Dual (grammatical number); Leverage (statistics); Political socialization; Democracy; Immigration","score_opus":0.19620284188490872,"score_gpt":0.5965910023620735,"score_spread":0.4003881604771648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416942093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49672863,0.0005796675,0.0011096336,0.080554105,0.0028283799,0.0007934107,0.000023361192,0.00015133922,0.41723147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98309,0.00030035136,0.007998599,0.0024712265,0.0009380874,0.00006305761,0.0000018039825,0.000010030634,0.0051268484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888361,0.0034302007,0.00030927677,0.0006226055,0.0017222706,0.005079549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891364,0.0065406435,0.000021597012,0.00032790174,0.0007083167,0.003265118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017956492,0.0001615022,0.00029497818,0.00053715095,0.0033414518,0.0012405688,0.0006824674,0.0002031066,0.00016041799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029978184,0.0001451048,0.000070499686,0.0020789371,0.015060794,0.00048821038,0.00052213005,0.00094126415,0.00002134254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005946844,0.000064489126,0.005316404,0.00001986325,0.000007957513,0.000008845173,0.0035562275,1.2764078e-8,0.0007311636,0.97565913,0.00036646394,0.014263514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030870808,0.00014844826,0.019828163,0.00010164016,0.00002026464,0.0000032835896,0.103412725,0.000041818184,0.007352158,0.7528973,0.11563036,0.0002550918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013514089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047964582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48636135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009651583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043232115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}