{"meta":{"query_hash":"487ccd6738cc","filters":{"venue":"Political Studies"},"cohort_total":73,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"exported":73,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/487ccd6738cc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1515967280","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00930.x","title":"Does Holding Beliefs with Conviction Prevent Policy Actors from Adopting a Compromising Attitude?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Flexibility (engineering); Conviction; Politics; Democracy; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Belief system; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.10094971217238986,"score_gpt":0.4186342575045379,"score_spread":0.31768454533214807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515967280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851511,0.00044080528,0.00032134584,0.0082829185,0.0005152786,0.0002957561,0.000014864126,0.00014064605,0.004837283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953301,0.000013001694,0.00026414436,0.00033879944,0.0037168448,0.000039284823,0.0000038166386,0.000014494718,0.00027950524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977146,0.00026585328,0.00027791882,0.00019557045,0.00039441403,0.001151647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857545,0.00062246725,0.00007909992,0.00011005318,0.00015975545,0.00045317932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004295011,0.00015778777,0.00028736054,0.000048883776,0.000783352,0.00007610932,0.000087460176,0.000081341714,0.000042182743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009462635,0.00009337278,0.00005134692,0.00023662677,0.00041014887,0.0003245266,0.00005753624,0.00013949431,0.000039548337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146557,0.000101385864,0.3603764,0.000031471303,0.00011666537,7.3070674e-7,0.007960208,0.0000015019841,0.00010284883,0.63083446,0.000055119715,0.00041008173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001209676,0.0003617408,0.8709297,0.0010841531,0.00041785755,0.000002595206,0.029579494,0.000050942246,0.0033899583,0.042156685,0.049411442,0.0014057268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056371972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048315628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58867776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008705952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585834220","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00969.x","title":"Social Capital and Ethno-racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in an Immigrant Society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Social capital; Diversity (politics); Multiculturalism; Normalization (sociology); Immigration; Ethnic group; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Racial diversity; Contact hypothesis; Social psychology; Politics; Political socialization; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Social science; American political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08767882723229209,"score_gpt":0.38629586093622376,"score_spread":0.29861703370393167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585834220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902865,0.001134545,0.0000033571744,0.005596451,0.00022587074,0.00012174782,0.0000032807677,0.000055884822,0.0025723598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689317,0.000078553494,0.000039910155,0.00070742355,0.0020865828,0.0000114622535,0.0000012105095,0.0000069733237,0.00017473212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982898,0.0001819957,0.00012450725,0.00017358839,0.00029875222,0.00093133294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.00020309896,0.000021533573,0.00003117829,0.000061024402,0.00033848107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059814396,0.00011326279,0.00023474627,0.000025738937,0.001899463,0.00003964778,0.00009816348,0.00012823613,0.000022360704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028277177,0.000107653126,0.000080768266,0.00018480762,0.0006950992,0.00025738095,0.0003882336,0.0002450654,0.000019660003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114399345,0.000050400988,0.19291654,0.0000057743173,0.00002376248,0.0000011745497,0.67949355,2.1352041e-7,0.000003844982,0.12548724,0.00020732882,0.0017987433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022855977,0.0000713669,0.30107164,0.000007663874,0.00002965423,2.2396613e-7,0.6855077,0.000004945714,0.000005323399,0.010006218,0.002842242,0.00022443669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005940365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006084756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11548103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020739649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021803442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594187640","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x","title":"Women's Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Democracy; Language change; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Affect (linguistics); Lower house; Political system; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.21762590270375196,"score_gpt":0.42316828671543144,"score_spread":0.20554238401167949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594187640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823676,0.00006707638,0.000002472888,0.0011417699,0.00004578601,0.00018919843,0.00000857345,0.000003229864,0.016174315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996563,0.00011988982,0.000021413372,0.0000625257,0.000031627435,0.00004064308,8.794765e-7,0.0000030000158,0.000063711064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987847,0.00026849186,0.0002387408,0.00010963581,0.00031452856,0.00028390778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990422,0.0006726224,0.00007687508,0.000069883055,0.0000994414,0.000038962236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006192212,0.000065841305,0.00013703069,0.000047616544,0.0001427454,0.000009234278,0.00008061175,0.000029356017,0.00005347768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005608243,0.000037056554,0.00003739658,0.0001652334,0.00059421384,0.00007642892,0.00005049988,0.00007083167,0.000002515916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024510058,0.00010105393,0.6761894,0.0000079878255,0.000045391298,5.4270055e-7,0.06773125,0.0000066877096,0.000015444357,0.25566494,0.000059867703,0.0001528985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014247825,0.00003066436,0.6388243,0.000014997989,0.0000044905137,2.6376009e-7,0.14025939,0.000021970776,0.00014162029,0.22052352,0.0000041417193,0.000032208318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016876623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047808982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07252813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022764286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055661552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597855413","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00975.x","title":"Group Rights and Shared Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University College Dublin","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Fundamental rights; Law; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.1856507005785668,"score_gpt":0.43245100305721584,"score_spread":0.24680030247864904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597855413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29511136,0.005659941,0.000036742855,0.05054125,0.0011351799,0.00021177763,0.000027368886,0.00021378933,0.6470626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964701,0.000040545834,0.00010887375,0.0016801385,0.001329162,0.000009715348,7.725099e-7,0.000004240855,0.0003564724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985288,0.0001432214,0.00012522904,0.00011806426,0.00020908394,0.0008756148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985038,0.0008098119,0.000013038712,0.000072109906,0.000054840384,0.0005464026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042070466,0.00008880793,0.00015967827,0.000023311211,0.00057413813,0.00003187297,0.0000862245,0.000086103944,0.00005509111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128009,0.00006839561,0.00003717781,0.000060735758,0.0014781421,0.00023144606,0.00011816021,0.00015901364,0.000103022394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029079602,0.000039428065,0.0031208924,0.000014229578,0.00002699884,0.0000011423766,0.0065755653,9.617868e-10,0.0000013503317,0.98943514,0.00068761857,0.00009474246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082894694,0.000020933592,0.009557114,0.000020926176,0.000020606301,9.4495454e-7,0.0020469222,4.0065623e-7,0.000017920172,0.93162763,0.056496706,0.00010700562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013714046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038715467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70135874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008960221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011874191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5446276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1614415425","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12091","title":"The Longest Negotiation: British Policy, IRA Strategy and the Making of the Northern Ireland Peace Settlement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Negotiation; Settlement (finance); Political science; Northern ireland; State (computer science); Key (lock); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.026527419008236717,"score_gpt":0.3222031526825367,"score_spread":0.29567573367429995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1614415425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39507225,0.025627041,0.0000031881045,0.31529593,0.00037169585,0.00097130425,0.000037853973,0.00004262026,0.2625781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460906,0.0018361507,0.0000057914353,0.001123914,0.00054348947,0.000060373237,2.7871857e-7,0.0000055374935,0.0018154175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855477,0.00020828085,0.00022536567,0.00013683544,0.00035945614,0.0005152754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886286,0.00065083685,0.00007702914,0.00010805817,0.0002605238,0.000040659794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048595248,0.000093891504,0.00019365428,0.000008582725,0.0023296655,0.00024514942,0.00023954602,0.000034446275,0.000017181244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011248145,0.000048637066,0.000071545226,0.00014361308,0.0034051714,0.000080124635,0.00026628203,0.00011732137,0.000009387414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015383337,0.000058122463,0.18806772,0.0000574053,0.00043608353,0.0000028071086,0.01946052,0.0000021350243,0.0000011779844,0.6285566,0.14566936,0.017672712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006391674,0.000039728002,0.79886097,0.00009566544,0.00008067207,0.000007970453,0.11558306,0.000010757939,0.000004137748,0.036940362,0.047569312,0.00016820576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024732498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036766607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61079323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079244746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1758659582","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12090","title":"The Politicization of European Integration: More than an Elite Affair?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; European union; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Assertion; European integration; Population; Phenomenon; Sociology; Law; International trade; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05713037382868516,"score_gpt":0.36291701448464986,"score_spread":0.3057866406559647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1758659582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119440086,0.0008809098,0.00015094237,0.028286649,0.00026334936,0.00024786987,0.000016735334,0.00009696715,0.8506165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943233,0.0004438075,0.00006517699,0.0009869419,0.0005629825,0.000007484575,0.0000016924072,0.000009711515,0.0035988917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845606,0.0004896444,0.00023082198,0.00012746814,0.00027210085,0.00042391737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989202,0.00036661304,0.00007458445,0.00017748427,0.00030796515,0.00015315201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045732537,0.00008581708,0.00011486695,0.000018298146,0.00064369873,0.00007058712,0.0002439523,0.000020292295,0.000027032787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016871499,0.000054776727,0.00004616429,0.00013499495,0.0011661737,0.00022814739,0.000069928166,0.000079154066,0.00009899382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015579587,0.000019101739,0.0008624654,0.0000040534687,0.000013581656,4.5082643e-7,0.005675492,2.9483382e-7,0.0000167788,0.9907934,0.00066526915,0.0019475579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026962563,0.00014259499,0.56344575,0.00012256269,0.000037876445,0.0000013756961,0.12114244,0.00004505911,0.0006451736,0.16497894,0.14884228,0.00032632292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027427473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007371144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87488323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058164936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031355343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4950875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778294656","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01004.x","title":"The Politics of Unconditional Basic Income: Bringing Bureaucracy Back In","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Basic income; Politics; Point (geometry); Payment; Cybernetics; Work (physics); Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Market economy; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.07742717719085071,"score_gpt":0.39043168602893963,"score_spread":0.31300450883808895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778294656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7387416,0.0027812694,0.000019270725,0.01139127,0.0010567127,0.00020364605,0.000051996853,0.00003428377,0.24571995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971852,0.000113377406,0.000063839805,0.00048757388,0.0008343693,0.000009204578,0.000002327832,0.0000059487825,0.0012981711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797434,0.0002487527,0.00033527333,0.00010125226,0.00039831587,0.0009420666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978468,0.0016525052,0.00005957666,0.00012404313,0.00014875272,0.00016831481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012705072,0.00009726474,0.00021977464,0.000040995557,0.00064291584,0.000021894355,0.00017601384,0.00005411215,0.000087370565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022661688,0.0000692263,0.00007260234,0.00018439318,0.0010932843,0.00018697957,0.00012267215,0.00013779885,0.000062140294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021497397,0.000047795613,0.1908411,0.000021802467,0.000022421596,3.162278e-7,0.0032156713,2.1303474e-7,0.0000011536882,0.8050479,0.00071702164,0.00008244318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033578835,0.000031377796,0.53939444,0.000076829456,0.000025574156,0.0000011393765,0.028469251,0.000009806534,0.00014191562,0.36769375,0.063594855,0.00022529064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004695502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009450333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43735418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032762057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009082474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70982254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804212557","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00926.x","title":"The 2011 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework: Global Health Secured or a Missed Opportunity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Preparedness; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public relations; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Pandemic; Equity (law); Global health; Indonesian; Business; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Virus","score_opus":0.3230131558259299,"score_gpt":0.4842412953559471,"score_spread":0.16122813953001724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804212557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21729545,0.033302702,0.0004397709,0.2887659,0.005986285,0.0034426523,0.000539524,0.0017368878,0.44849083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634484,0.0028024788,0.0002958055,0.032435995,0.0005175196,0.00006887016,0.000002274557,0.000010380625,0.0004182715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996025,0.00084421615,0.00049381924,0.00031357873,0.00055512023,0.001768255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968929,0.0009925269,0.00013398804,0.00029414,0.00029885527,0.0013875352],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022296156,0.00019575711,0.000385953,0.000019030129,0.002486746,0.00008591689,0.00053227955,0.0001959852,0.00035554287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066160792,0.00012291885,0.00009498622,0.0003029582,0.0013832536,0.00016739151,0.00019613699,0.00031330317,0.00010701692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007453556,0.00009765848,0.0064450637,0.000033998982,0.00008166318,0.00000580892,0.040301513,1.8344027e-8,1.1161069e-8,0.9315452,0.017661374,0.003753184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001987809,0.00016333796,0.008481765,0.00005297036,0.000018327733,0.0000044289113,0.07304602,0.0000020000198,3.2394786e-7,0.39899594,0.51885444,0.00018165915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043870915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028123625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74615294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091475743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027734267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836838334","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00842.x","title":"Public Spending, Public Deficits and Government Coalitions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Status quo; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Status quo bias; Government (linguistics); Economics; Government spending; Public economics; Coalition government; Power (physics); Public spending; Political science; Politics; Market economy; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.1626504726451763,"score_gpt":0.27658169147865486,"score_spread":0.11393121883347856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836838334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51146793,0.0010217346,0.000087778266,0.035136733,0.00062566734,0.00012659644,0.00038009914,0.00006004633,0.4510934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769384,0.000059697923,0.00018960271,0.001271196,0.00033588166,0.000034094886,0.0000037904904,0.000015324056,0.0003965639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985089,0.000009123584,0.00041545992,0.00033881175,0.000039480117,0.0006882328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919915,0.00018162519,0.00008872145,0.00020454894,0.000018349636,0.0003075818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003351399,0.0001506229,0.0003493633,0.00007043082,0.0002669861,0.0001369618,0.00013896824,0.00008232428,0.000201504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011431033,0.00015618266,0.00007182343,0.000078563884,0.00037287475,0.0002515048,0.00020386846,0.00022055439,0.00054070057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.2995134e-7,0.00004626764,0.1257632,0.000016731534,0.00006001697,8.1973036e-7,0.00006134345,1.1974657e-8,0.0000039815886,0.872916,0.0010186904,0.00011204776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026232388,0.00003397276,0.11347352,0.000003241392,0.0000058936785,0.0000104366745,0.00028742655,0.00007120229,0.000029138584,0.8144983,0.07110865,0.00021588904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074427975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014267999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4862259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012646803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000781983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69497925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837825643","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12059","title":"Canada's Republican Invention? On the Political Theory and Practice of Citizens' Assemblies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Institution; Ideal (ethics); Law; Order (exchange); Democratic theory; Citizenship; Sociology; Law and economics; Representation (politics); Character (mathematics); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.037430435923000015,"score_gpt":0.31810666974042207,"score_spread":0.28067623381742207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837825643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03790914,0.0009754786,0.0000020357122,0.3411982,0.00021868931,0.00021214716,0.00003034567,0.000022402264,0.61943156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98478556,0.000107321255,0.000015399797,0.010983171,0.00017494263,0.000027594717,4.930865e-7,0.0000050281287,0.0039005042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982132,0.0006278391,0.00017110439,0.00013553754,0.00037108533,0.0004812338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937168,0.0055126417,0.00004800915,0.00013210365,0.0002993121,0.00029113606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082819886,0.00006821245,0.00015544634,0.00008070248,0.0008063425,0.00012522085,0.0001235586,0.000038605365,0.00039262333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019302733,0.000055908236,0.000037496866,0.00012823494,0.0025998647,0.00011904294,0.000061366074,0.00012280355,0.000010770734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044852086,0.000017200056,0.00011904964,0.000010073884,0.000049300867,0.0000018866469,0.00077669136,1.051034e-8,0.0000022333888,0.93436533,0.06433381,0.00031990343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067665336,0.000035952857,0.009215968,0.00002204586,0.000043455744,0.0000025746726,0.09871897,3.849039e-7,0.000009701728,0.40692762,0.4848559,0.00009977048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006742267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087933906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45623254708739935,"score_gpt":0.47709534641451484,"score_spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893974355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591111,0.0015235774,0.00032118833,0.14970455,0.0013334944,0.00038333584,0.00003645098,0.00034049223,0.7872458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98969835,0.000025170184,0.00018545156,0.0061168466,0.0035309664,0.00003630821,0.0000030780943,0.00001175162,0.00039206535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619025,0.00049904134,0.00029756065,0.00022284164,0.0005863621,0.0022039437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665123,0.0016191596,0.00002714776,0.00018218638,0.00023483021,0.0012854324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010798624,0.00016433209,0.00029748786,0.000040836985,0.0007845387,0.00004043439,0.00016242324,0.00018576723,0.0001037486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00808745,0.00014325356,0.000116519535,0.00016619592,0.004463138,0.00062870217,0.0001221575,0.00031820443,0.0004147761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080836735,0.0001425075,0.005030706,0.00001416378,0.000034103672,0.0000013273619,0.0103639625,2.604148e-8,0.0000028763905,0.9838837,0.00045580865,0.0000627446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016995468,0.000047010883,0.0016050591,0.000014626735,0.000042228774,0.0000010815255,0.053931218,0.0000011997944,0.000115279254,0.91102314,0.032852713,0.00019646285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005576343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007903963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93058723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005600393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012072263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896758939","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00781.x","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Global English: Language Politics in Globalisation Debates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Globalization; Public sphere; Language politics; Sociology; Metaphor; State (computer science); Sociology of language; Global politics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Law; Language education; Comprehension approach; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07267821476621121,"score_gpt":0.4894183011300244,"score_spread":0.41674008636381316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896758939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896082,0.0017791761,0.0000030986248,0.015259629,0.0002766667,0.00013472245,0.000024733932,0.00008528866,0.19282849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518013,0.00015281924,0.00013193607,0.003455357,0.00070163055,0.000004125469,0.0000028356847,0.0000026118712,0.00036853427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987578,0.00013220782,0.00018428106,0.00015538529,0.0001852575,0.0005851041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931514,0.00022130185,0.000024422201,0.00007707615,0.00011290615,0.0002491573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025951967,0.000098644945,0.00016504209,0.000036279074,0.00022970635,0.00005112835,0.000082365186,0.000068095054,0.000021194586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032071127,0.00009257057,0.000026537375,0.00018138393,0.00039117385,0.000094028335,0.000024774039,0.00007053336,0.000012277768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018178428,0.00004480488,0.00845297,0.000006062706,0.000005945943,0.0000019545616,0.056271013,1.2685842e-7,0.0000011899577,0.9330756,0.00029822986,0.0018402761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005060935,0.0000671532,0.14453305,0.000041389452,0.00002333366,0.0000019354998,0.3164217,0.0000152197545,0.00006908293,0.5106684,0.02736013,0.00029250592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008765336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017757879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42240718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046936495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011544751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943366961","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00547.x","title":"Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Intervention (counseling); Empire; Introspection; Politics; International relations; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0734456788707056,"score_gpt":0.4252741545714664,"score_spread":0.3518284757007608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943366961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6009811,0.002370226,0.000121874626,0.06164722,0.00029334627,0.0001319063,0.000019051962,0.00008197883,0.3343533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933463,0.00021853189,0.00021368256,0.0010633375,0.00034837515,0.000009451863,7.5184084e-7,0.00000272929,0.0047968905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992082,0.000105448424,0.00014844384,0.00013190102,0.00012329206,0.00028267634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992984,0.00040605004,0.000017623108,0.000043932305,0.000073265255,0.0001607491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037858673,0.000060586313,0.00009569039,0.00002946071,0.00037267525,0.000043078508,0.000062415056,0.00003904265,0.00015396658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016939292,0.00005326182,0.000028099495,0.000044604454,0.0010164252,0.00025620515,0.00008895698,0.00007767448,0.000067042754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036161116,0.000024973466,0.0056216507,0.0000037129005,0.00002887041,4.3774966e-7,0.0018323633,1.2779941e-7,0.0000026358564,0.9874035,0.00046634418,0.0046117534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003121064,0.000048379945,0.050602578,0.000052081676,0.000031163207,0.000003257204,0.009056883,0.000034963396,0.00004117248,0.68538314,0.2542836,0.0001506427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014816022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015376686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39236513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008932048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011849325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37450612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985837429","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00400","title":"Parliamentary Election Turnout in Europe since 1990","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Bivariate analysis; Voting; Range (aeronautics); Demographic economics; Public administration; Geography; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11421700350258138,"score_gpt":0.3854178568132271,"score_spread":0.2712008533106457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985837429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86125284,0.0019845897,0.000018130839,0.045376427,0.0005656943,0.00031387724,0.0000054867683,0.00013467792,0.09034829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971358,0.0000817565,0.00001874126,0.000938633,0.0005244871,0.000028243965,8.5656563e-7,0.000006756207,0.0012647323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831975,0.00027743986,0.00023972707,0.00017057177,0.00025259255,0.00073989807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993137,0.00029169561,0.000025719084,0.000074783886,0.00011067246,0.00018339713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002682656,0.000090898684,0.00017889825,0.00004290757,0.0002729771,0.00003360608,0.000073955984,0.000049501097,0.00013827438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010485227,0.00007866114,0.000030535135,0.00038092287,0.00029987615,0.00012909915,0.000026320266,0.00011956089,0.0002945843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041831418,0.000114597024,0.07057688,0.000019838988,0.000020492897,0.000008176202,0.0023460954,0.0000011019365,0.000050667135,0.92213756,0.0034802041,0.001240231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014777039,0.00069875334,0.2385714,0.00038004084,0.00012251361,0.000006799114,0.011346286,0.00061697414,0.0014086325,0.13224348,0.6117363,0.0013911152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033326976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018596036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78989404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031427562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001764271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987184260","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00378","title":"Why is there so Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Group voting ticket; Split-ticket voting; Political science; Single non-transferable vote; Ranked voting system; General election; Contingent vote; Preference; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Spoilt vote; First-past-the-post voting; Instant-runoff voting; Primary election; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1731824556346918,"score_gpt":0.39644265496890957,"score_spread":0.22326019933421776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987184260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8053531,0.0018330242,0.0000026423747,0.083025135,0.00024408098,0.00022525928,0.00001746997,0.00006682844,0.10923248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575686,0.000017062519,0.000009848337,0.0025895352,0.0003794044,0.000030100377,8.7469203e-7,0.000006899331,0.001209434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978589,0.0002455209,0.00025225503,0.00018919207,0.00021537396,0.0012388013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904186,0.00024453728,0.000025725614,0.00008033627,0.00011644108,0.0004910775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036799582,0.00010515099,0.00019873098,0.000060571434,0.0007614106,0.00009831042,0.000090167734,0.00009122397,0.00074426905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052717933,0.00009339107,0.000052447453,0.00031071284,0.0003659361,0.0001137766,0.000015749116,0.00016134871,0.0002274858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0573475e-7,0.000031592168,0.15047996,0.000017461483,0.000017578515,0.0000034550542,0.0021459546,8.218619e-7,0.0000033351052,0.8437662,0.0034509276,0.000082011036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006327206,0.00020051251,0.22148411,0.00021964453,0.000074446645,0.0000029262649,0.01598753,0.0012346217,0.00022284045,0.41145733,0.3474446,0.0010387297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95514774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96795833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43230888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075160514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111648995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8149224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993021756","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x","title":"Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Outcome (game theory); Control (management); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.07739236580483107,"score_gpt":0.41510132374803044,"score_spread":0.3377089579431994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993021756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976782,0.00032360558,0.0005621001,0.007187737,0.00009985594,0.000110703164,7.873886e-7,0.00006165145,0.014871557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880385,0.0000073315273,0.00020860578,0.00032189605,0.00038610317,0.0000034145896,2.4175358e-7,0.000005092063,0.00026343617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989076,0.00006419079,0.00013926029,0.000119061704,0.00020617023,0.000563679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00043779818,0.000025327829,0.000042809566,0.00009973342,0.00022463487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045880096,0.000068075045,0.00012454315,0.000027067039,0.00058558077,0.000035462625,0.000021389626,0.000041014002,0.000016566422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044153206,0.00005098096,0.000013980062,0.000103129045,0.00048054135,0.00011750732,0.000015252515,0.00006953088,0.000012645606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060657294,0.000005222129,0.4213876,0.000009793873,0.000014913226,0.0000021546873,0.0008539476,9.065369e-8,0.000021929938,0.57639027,0.00006363515,0.0012443922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022409968,0.00013975815,0.90690756,0.00007491682,0.000048453898,0.000003954762,0.0052118236,0.000005633993,0.0003277796,0.08086804,0.0059919613,0.00019599474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019060774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023941906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4955222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013766658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024029172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001322293","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00759.x","title":"Multiculturalism and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Multiculturalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Identity (music); Public administration; Section (typography); Business","score_opus":0.046047158019897956,"score_gpt":0.3229604105415068,"score_spread":0.27691325252160887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001322293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96917754,0.0015748275,0.0000019041607,0.012150986,0.000090723755,0.00014384983,0.0000070584633,0.000008552141,0.016844532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983641,0.00027290752,0.000029237774,0.00030087147,0.00014687328,0.00000718396,7.4496046e-7,0.0000010062247,0.0008770752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950206,0.00007022474,0.00008914868,0.00006498641,0.00010746111,0.00016614496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958515,0.00014500832,0.000015518328,0.00003373372,0.000119566226,0.00010101019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001369568,0.000043310578,0.00010361109,0.000015435588,0.0008815956,0.000014805721,0.00003123723,0.000029976803,0.000013376819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030204517,0.000021313965,0.000016770671,0.00003318776,0.0021794464,0.000063120395,0.000008532814,0.00003606679,0.0000025434065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020060372,0.0000029001362,0.0012721329,0.0000022446409,0.000015715352,3.755571e-7,0.083397634,1.0993568e-8,0.000002329644,0.91371185,0.0015607295,0.000032058917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024299887,0.0001294551,0.26078606,0.00007372974,0.00013984287,0.000017914319,0.08000721,0.00019542179,0.0005135325,0.3503909,0.30484584,0.00047007584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6314876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90342504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56332093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038162776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029375196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80302614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004500282","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00566.x","title":"The Social Policies Presidents Make: Pre-Emptive Leadership under Nixon and Clinton","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Presidential system; Politics; Typology; Ideology; Craft; Legislature; Sociology; Public administration; Political science; Power (physics); Political economy; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.16788923207555484,"score_gpt":0.398857399474346,"score_spread":0.23096816739879117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004500282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45139527,0.0055135037,0.000011620155,0.08659756,0.00050965295,0.00023572639,0.000019453872,0.000108842374,0.45560837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723093,0.0001546996,0.0000069845287,0.0013013985,0.001416255,0.0000178211,7.404889e-7,0.000005751779,0.02478708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983638,0.00014380153,0.00021480653,0.00018537091,0.00018671752,0.0009055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990121,0.0006824076,0.00003638445,0.00006309964,0.000055735996,0.00015024065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003541116,0.00011855354,0.00019745949,0.000021207747,0.0026325134,0.000091734124,0.00013312054,0.00008271981,0.000017992405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002754907,0.00008450311,0.00007163097,0.00004403003,0.003065372,0.000073808136,0.00007771324,0.00012106368,0.00004302368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125072065,0.000022361397,0.0021805794,0.000011550499,0.000036443387,7.171807e-7,0.0048646866,1.9888043e-7,0.0000014942668,0.98537457,0.006941485,0.00055342435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024381024,0.000040573927,0.20235701,0.0000127890335,0.00004996025,8.916466e-7,0.04890381,0.000003640412,0.000020284502,0.5500654,0.19808984,0.00021199265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012272659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00894571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.520914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024622155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054758002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015785474","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00507.x","title":"Globalisation, Ecological Modernisation and New Labour","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological modernization; Globalization; Modernization theory; Politics; Neglect; Government (linguistics); Economic system; Environmental degradation; Economics; Principal (computer security); Public policy; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.07683598137470636,"score_gpt":0.31445464140940405,"score_spread":0.23761866003469767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015785474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799641,0.00020197671,0.00013879643,0.015269856,0.000040423445,0.00008401263,0.000003783172,0.000031951215,0.004265129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757797,0.00008249347,0.00038939333,0.0015990562,0.000059877144,0.000008702584,6.9714116e-7,0.0000025624536,0.00027924957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993052,0.00001602322,0.000093561765,0.000177119,0.0001364617,0.0002716234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972856,0.00005914702,0.000017852275,0.000067520414,0.000009729771,0.00011720311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000803172,0.00007063026,0.00009296928,0.000003761679,0.000119032804,0.000014334105,0.00004829742,0.00003405874,0.00024835463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003499735,0.000055809516,0.00001655246,0.000052864816,0.0003153733,0.000101367244,0.0001467848,0.000040262672,0.000095066374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133471685,0.00011086104,0.073284596,0.000027362375,0.000016098527,0.000007164858,0.0057092505,0.00034368507,0.000046879602,0.9183651,0.00086968794,0.0012059521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023487303,0.000045837878,0.4190999,0.0000035135706,0.0000066575353,0.000003511927,0.0048055765,0.000012364576,0.000097821845,0.5729525,0.0026627693,0.00007468173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013586265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004862642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3458153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052779645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009197599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2719309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023023773","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00723.x","title":"Imperial Liberties: Democratisation and Governance in the ‘New’ Imperial Order","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Sociology; Democracy; Hegemony; Civil society; Law; Political science; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.05188614856526704,"score_gpt":0.2510561030695004,"score_spread":0.19916995450423333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023023773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440061,0.003467721,0.000030856583,0.028791362,0.0014048218,0.00033011264,0.00006644484,0.00008010226,0.12182246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911539,0.00017620799,0.000034051754,0.0019499952,0.0017812923,0.000024483394,0.0000031315997,0.000008621522,0.0048683016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890995,0.000067112815,0.0002581786,0.0001745727,0.00019741556,0.0003927673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937826,0.00033472123,0.000027340167,0.000102711914,0.0000568251,0.0001001286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000077565,0.00014031386,0.00022615105,0.000016255872,0.00040407086,0.000049341426,0.00010484965,0.000036994486,0.00017465331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003806362,0.000085802174,0.000040162446,0.000037589958,0.00080466946,0.00015813936,0.000054713917,0.00013083707,0.000032874068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025248628,0.00003744036,0.00028001456,0.000011421888,0.000016911177,0.000010626571,0.038453743,1.4405771e-7,0.000002528403,0.95420563,0.006706534,0.00024973424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010624084,0.00029332517,0.0049519353,0.000028902787,0.000032820168,0.000023244454,0.0053875763,0.00014001003,0.00001094855,0.4184982,0.5691949,0.00037575865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016169666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094458845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5624884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084630265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005337453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3498911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025994862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00701.x","title":"Obligation by Association? A Reply to John Horton","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Moral obligation; Sociology; Association (psychology); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08018636217447421,"score_gpt":0.42054983002937246,"score_spread":0.34036346785489824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025994862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05237347,0.000379516,0.0003649163,0.379088,0.0006128313,0.00026094695,0.00003269401,0.00019961434,0.566688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96988654,0.00003878093,0.00016124122,0.025747858,0.0010003368,0.000012048839,0.0000023523369,0.0000072426183,0.00314358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769944,0.00012954288,0.00027030634,0.00021235923,0.00065552193,0.0010328366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708706,0.001911181,0.00004111176,0.00010576965,0.00031706737,0.00053781737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257812,0.000098527446,0.00018804212,0.000048392023,0.0006673985,0.00004703886,0.0001303175,0.00012823124,0.000029526931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013424478,0.00009288665,0.0000635034,0.00028655803,0.00031876765,0.000114246046,0.00006607029,0.0002075603,0.0002569086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006005672,0.000037999896,0.0032323615,0.000006437038,0.000037623016,0.0000017602338,0.0032763518,6.722274e-8,0.000017424309,0.9653526,0.02777574,0.00025563614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009975205,0.000055211833,0.0063509676,0.000016920529,0.00002688997,1.6136991e-7,0.0047117947,4.8494377e-7,0.00058519415,0.62125534,0.36673233,0.00016493244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002548668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052675325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009820313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066723645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99488586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047852660","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00504.x","title":"The Ambiguities of Reconciliation and Responsibility in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; McGill University","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Commission; Denial; Narrative; Moral responsibility; Reading (process); Balance (ability); Sociology; Law; Responsibility to protect; Political science; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08089644965285242,"score_gpt":0.3697666242673601,"score_spread":0.2888701746145077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047852660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98974967,0.004104237,0.0000025516206,0.0012866103,0.00018956416,0.00008422055,0.000008271175,0.000010766305,0.004564093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995025,0.000047301924,0.000015654261,0.00002140978,0.000016258415,0.000020828955,2.4173357e-7,0.0000034237037,0.00037242277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929595,0.00008315037,0.0001994495,0.00011777715,0.0000687514,0.0002349474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946076,0.0003190505,0.000029123084,0.00011274299,0.00004828002,0.000030069888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003213224,0.00005829688,0.00013691219,0.00002762149,0.000086458545,0.0000047765484,0.000041007603,0.00005405524,0.000007951279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031506535,0.000034774774,0.000025621513,0.000072247225,0.00056739437,0.000015809796,0.000037982118,0.00009222436,0.000007889841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011712402,0.00008250647,0.048007187,0.000018868295,0.000058169993,0.0000056550275,0.030954413,0.0000018632741,0.000023911083,0.9196402,0.000018656781,0.0010714894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007935307,0.00017738264,0.7993319,0.000043441007,0.000027635217,0.000002320961,0.057446018,6.090025e-7,0.00025482272,0.1412293,0.0006024239,0.00009060289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022574411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090523936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77841085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016091071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20905882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071676811","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00439","title":"Contractualism and Liberal Neutrality: A Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Neutrality; Legitimacy; Mistake; Law and economics; Impartiality; Politics; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Political science; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16282176328477097,"score_gpt":0.419368508874564,"score_spread":0.25654674558979307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071676811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16767997,0.0025903315,0.000029995099,0.0747011,0.00038337478,0.00017487374,0.000013861928,0.00012658075,0.75429994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918072,0.00022058461,0.00011381708,0.006882281,0.00026288017,0.000011233184,2.252482e-7,0.000005245524,0.00069650775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830264,0.00031610904,0.00016113896,0.00018882881,0.00024357576,0.00078772503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.0014632789,0.000016707552,0.00008641299,0.00010007,0.00043213816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006136294,0.0001026169,0.00020683682,0.000019364856,0.0006103564,0.000050947332,0.00007690838,0.00010121913,0.00003266148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051162164,0.00008757343,0.000046591187,0.0000815025,0.0022640256,0.00012594905,0.000036636622,0.00021125765,0.00003288875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022435324,0.000019124036,0.00070686825,0.000012719126,0.000024182731,0.0000055024107,0.006219419,2.462211e-8,0.0000020417697,0.9927344,0.00019687417,0.00007665281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012834778,0.000022577187,0.0014479802,0.000012794506,0.00002336466,0.0000024566202,0.004356552,5.1500575e-7,0.000055130353,0.94857454,0.045255043,0.00012071532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067392323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019037917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82412726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007050127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007847996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83418965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079916482","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00280","title":"Bougainville and Papua New Guinea: Complexities of Secession in a Multi-Ethnic Developing State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Morality; Ethnic group; New guinea; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Normative; Distributive justice; Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.3779954448919442,"score_gpt":0.4751971691122485,"score_spread":0.09720172422030432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079916482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80510306,0.009082476,0.00015057607,0.05215699,0.00018577887,0.0003601795,0.000047700494,0.00012829348,0.13278492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949107,0.0015162631,0.0010103103,0.00136403,0.00012878237,0.0000057139673,9.1760654e-7,0.0000066296557,0.001056655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984179,0.00019475474,0.00030827397,0.00017937444,0.00024928225,0.00065038167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878675,0.000808719,0.000026534868,0.00007538257,0.00007099396,0.00023162688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044783996,0.00011513509,0.0003083267,0.00004646164,0.00026042244,0.000015458794,0.000109627974,0.00007878517,0.0000709642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010067737,0.00009767875,0.000036272944,0.00017843368,0.0015722445,0.00011056334,0.000083620194,0.00017817708,0.0000141528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014470402,0.000033979362,0.002514249,0.00007075846,0.000021315718,0.0000037262344,0.017754346,0.0000015320946,0.0000046100017,0.9760504,0.0000857562,0.0034448765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482368,0.00003835275,0.03601908,0.00018788036,0.0000103553075,6.977986e-7,0.009200779,0.000023636117,0.00006323429,0.9470007,0.0068316585,0.0001753967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008877408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005398835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18980761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013015505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016333222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098351263","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12087","title":"Political Mobilisation, Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion: The Conditional Effect of Political Parties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multiculturalism; Rhetoric; Salience (neuroscience); Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cohesion (chemistry); Nationalism; Ethnic group; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08515644827209631,"score_gpt":0.36400754277304653,"score_spread":0.27885109450095025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098351263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95178515,0.0009673525,0.0000075570065,0.034222074,0.00019637341,0.00036154376,0.000023011853,0.000051667805,0.012385248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749297,0.0000305357,0.000005254766,0.0013236101,0.0009480297,0.00006121728,0.000003879134,0.0000058299547,0.00012868486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747753,0.0006485427,0.00022952072,0.0001910138,0.0005212401,0.0009321226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553627,0.0038250445,0.000042371532,0.0000725996,0.00025473515,0.00026895874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000634109,0.00014280394,0.00033834451,0.00002352765,0.00270112,0.00003008757,0.00015774422,0.00013947763,0.00013836965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012046066,0.000093754075,0.00012416134,0.00011768099,0.00602084,0.00014523532,0.00050984294,0.00019199974,0.000031218366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012133111,0.000028247621,0.021890502,0.000030704814,0.00006873343,6.618303e-7,0.010920811,3.6868062e-8,0.0000016382788,0.96552014,0.0013085419,0.00021782289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032002327,0.00017249332,0.2979264,0.000012795689,0.00011493488,8.9928585e-7,0.074987955,0.000008530096,0.000115038274,0.6257758,0.00040588953,0.00015924971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038414437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001809641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33974436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016341555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044566204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2148880415269112,"score_gpt":0.4882066868125774,"score_spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112170319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05986636,0.00079365587,0.0005716846,0.04068489,0.00058823446,0.00014875851,0.0000051750826,0.00010350439,0.8972377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505216,0.00005256792,0.00016089852,0.0035335626,0.0008522955,0.0000053420454,5.816604e-7,0.0000049324103,0.00033763252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826145,0.00023112686,0.00021409687,0.00014595377,0.00030731954,0.00084003696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962792,0.0032922484,0.000018762394,0.00006789355,0.00010866554,0.00023327302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036616,0.00007620553,0.00014880665,0.0000596012,0.00036771703,0.000017351607,0.00010038108,0.00010503869,0.00002173614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008985677,0.000067311026,0.00003741575,0.00021020774,0.001080024,0.0000947996,0.00004449669,0.00023539421,0.000086214226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019706236,0.000032850607,0.0005017265,0.000022422722,0.000011252767,0.000014552967,0.0072221262,2.638832e-7,0.0000020082234,0.9915615,0.000081371974,0.0005302249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011739383,0.000020738298,0.006209877,0.00001962044,0.000026480895,4.0248372e-7,0.02334911,0.0000015389827,0.000027774078,0.9634901,0.006651351,0.000085609514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010309907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015720837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93518585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027992058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067460634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112547010","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00611.x","title":"Testing the Decline of Parliament Thesis: Ireland, 1923–2002","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Irish; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07350500153003924,"score_gpt":0.34238886298699217,"score_spread":0.2688838614569529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112547010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19541569,0.01773156,0.000016792455,0.03967308,0.00034087748,0.00029927018,0.000021090445,0.000101900834,0.74639976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970751,0.00022423916,0.00023212616,0.0006852574,0.00075445115,0.00002865553,3.388002e-7,0.0000052375976,0.0009946313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985781,0.00011373907,0.00026041997,0.00013485739,0.00035999686,0.000552933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981124,0.0014526646,0.00005747561,0.000089156056,0.00023590685,0.000052419877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005136306,0.00009458193,0.00023306046,0.000016773956,0.0007674822,0.00003116383,0.00016119241,0.0000339174,0.000024961446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022540975,0.0000593717,0.00006834232,0.00017702597,0.0013289211,0.000043230033,0.00014653243,0.00007330545,0.000028160892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015802792,0.0003235696,0.19079587,0.000081801685,0.00028564694,0.000019746663,0.004096284,0.0000043828245,0.00004776195,0.54240406,0.2512915,0.010633567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073016144,0.00018787952,0.54718393,0.00025166137,0.0002787572,0.000005032278,0.08004538,0.000015221365,0.00050772633,0.13585187,0.23444664,0.0004957598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015762514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024893212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80165935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006402664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034809396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126871687","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12008","title":"Polls and the Vote in Britain","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Outcome (game theory); General election; Presidential election; Spoilt vote; Politics; Period (music); Opinion poll; Primary election; Presidential system; Group voting ticket; Public administration; Law; Economics; Public opinion","score_opus":0.07004385815879804,"score_gpt":0.39680287298870603,"score_spread":0.326759014829908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126871687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86583376,0.0009974075,0.000006321912,0.11073588,0.0001017879,0.0003701933,0.0000012076812,0.000025682712,0.021927753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975727,0.000013879911,0.000011665334,0.0011661913,0.00021798423,0.00007423995,9.689477e-8,0.0000026912353,0.0009405409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880505,0.00031139137,0.00015561216,0.000091492344,0.00014233925,0.0004941199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989188,0.000828197,0.000014008514,0.00005369855,0.000060889826,0.00012443693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051114685,0.000053551652,0.00015341387,0.000016954784,0.00024127307,0.00005330993,0.000054975382,0.00003400496,0.000023716351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015394995,0.00003189508,0.000023301303,0.00009861189,0.0010495882,0.000078507655,0.00003576791,0.00007077575,0.000060276558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027000813,0.0000063485954,0.04388746,0.000005908419,0.0000078738585,3.538812e-7,0.0017837085,5.8736013e-8,0.0000019502327,0.9535176,0.00047214064,0.00031387628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006120804,0.000026293128,0.37971294,0.00003243851,0.000013777889,5.195972e-7,0.006313357,0.00004631475,0.000017581206,0.608276,0.0048241057,0.00012457612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15546347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02149003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3452416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000730275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018588249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128284528","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00346","title":"Sowing Dragon's Teeth: Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear decommissioning; Politics; Political violence; Population; Criminology; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.055020239589923754,"score_gpt":0.35961784703244537,"score_spread":0.3045976074425216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128284528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8749036,0.0053761983,0.00007894416,0.039227262,0.00034068277,0.0005238593,0.000030760344,0.00011304583,0.07940562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960372,0.0017565858,0.00019780236,0.0010993183,0.00047681938,0.00011009063,0.000003155259,0.000012090388,0.00030698234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718374,0.00011855381,0.00031573212,0.0003696297,0.00030332454,0.0017090392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809265,0.0011870306,0.0000261611,0.00009951703,0.0002161981,0.00037845317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006757466,0.0001753717,0.00040357118,0.00007650182,0.00080977514,0.000078263,0.00014826233,0.00011693777,0.000012148433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036828069,0.00016027638,0.000081281374,0.00018463373,0.0015439253,0.00019465151,0.00015046203,0.0001685048,0.000014538658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017941891,0.00010763627,0.660685,0.00004760605,0.000063871754,0.000047304435,0.0024228424,9.8630586e-8,0.0000011372222,0.32761198,0.0014934931,0.0075010783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021177053,0.00041986266,0.39221427,0.00038380735,0.00011350623,0.000034469,0.1270438,0.00003528841,0.000016442109,0.35584405,0.12078503,0.0009917737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005477016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015511181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26847073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024541182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012455092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86556035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129462394","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00350","title":"Steger on Engels — A Brief Comment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Socialism; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18981073142651247,"score_gpt":0.45329904304675417,"score_spread":0.26348831162024167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129462394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023477875,0.00035784446,0.000019823934,0.19545387,0.0002858208,0.0001229881,0.000009799714,0.00008427344,0.7801877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799908,0.00013082977,0.000019122148,0.017963383,0.00087510695,0.000018328465,5.586652e-7,0.0000054949323,0.0009963862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.0002299761,0.00013249452,0.00016059764,0.0002821969,0.00056953146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819267,0.0013597752,0.000010032007,0.00011144327,0.00007179626,0.00025425683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004044459,0.00009291851,0.00017550714,0.000021924363,0.000557541,0.00003127118,0.00011574164,0.000046493315,0.00033806488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001062447,0.000075552394,0.000070854534,0.00010537567,0.000801011,0.0000493513,0.00005666913,0.00012337822,0.00029176867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019951094,0.00011541324,0.00025597945,0.0000052294317,0.000031037605,0.000015466896,0.0018163247,1.2960528e-7,0.0000017423523,0.99508476,0.0017172395,0.00093672477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009598506,0.000057122583,0.00013521769,0.0000136938725,0.000009618625,4.515233e-7,0.0025673867,3.8284188e-7,0.00003391165,0.51849663,0.4785187,0.00007092846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023219381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003706181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011888543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013207418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4288211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131643728","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00431","title":"Millian Radical Democracy: Education for Freedom and Dilemmas of Liberal Equality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meritocracy; Individualism; Democracy; Mill; Sociology; Liberalism; Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08261371204018352,"score_gpt":0.4138531305585156,"score_spread":0.33123941851833205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131643728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6474965,0.0032664612,0.0009369021,0.021192862,0.0010897105,0.00083264685,0.000090117814,0.000090267225,0.32500455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963932,0.00008016339,0.0016069943,0.00096649426,0.00024511528,0.000031928965,8.789341e-7,0.0000048413262,0.0006703551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856883,0.00031669854,0.0002439749,0.00016964012,0.00017054779,0.0005303299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796623,0.0014515845,0.000036002504,0.000093551105,0.00015374011,0.00029887448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008049844,0.000088037654,0.0002337214,0.000022311899,0.0004255234,0.000016446695,0.000089771194,0.0000691491,0.000036982954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007423274,0.00007472949,0.000062563515,0.00008101733,0.002338431,0.00011465806,0.000030559055,0.000070648566,0.000004893368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008865614,0.0000756375,0.004253339,0.00004639517,0.000025199373,1.1451776e-7,0.0011424617,6.306681e-8,0.000016048558,0.9933799,0.0004471681,0.0006048073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015184062,0.000052980795,0.003921682,0.000026295203,0.000027216376,5.9296013e-7,0.0027205062,0.0000018411683,0.00042871785,0.94848067,0.04408998,0.00009769636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033945643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039497103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34889674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075312164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019024052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88868886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133948504","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00665.x","title":"When US Scholars Speak of ‘Sovereignty’, what do they Mean?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); International relations; International law; Political science; Sociology; Territorial integrity; Human rights; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192800796130983,"score_gpt":0.36339164333671586,"score_spread":0.321463635375406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133948504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7168406,0.0060677645,0.000017174649,0.0033261708,0.00048749038,0.00016634363,0.000013740047,0.000056401608,0.27302432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963882,0.0019766262,0.00021180956,0.00087526394,0.0002678305,0.0000016321251,0.0000011385974,0.0000068296627,0.00027069612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980766,0.00010649159,0.000271988,0.0001953862,0.0005577179,0.0007917752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988541,0.00042864974,0.00005369868,0.00015770712,0.00026423522,0.00024159694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011250849,0.000121453675,0.00027940725,0.000044688757,0.0003285439,0.00010425654,0.00024883624,0.000097971424,0.000065015265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010562455,0.00010336765,0.00010964939,0.00011223517,0.0007411662,0.0004087848,0.00014326954,0.00016029688,0.00005847823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010951512,0.000060481867,0.009999046,0.00001621931,0.00006905745,0.0000077000705,0.014322751,5.394486e-7,0.000005752574,0.97385466,0.00022613064,0.0014266788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022968146,0.0000639208,0.0105941985,0.000097135206,0.00005134692,0.0000010877213,0.19385648,0.0000023588016,0.000068200745,0.77189326,0.022943972,0.00019835503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037958294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010674805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27954757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021256325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053262986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5956792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137375941","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x","title":"When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":607,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Cultural diversity; Interpersonal ties; Context (archaeology); Survey data collection; European Social Survey; Democracy; Social trust; Citizenship; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Social capital; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.0378203951933691,"score_gpt":0.31728311478897836,"score_spread":0.27946271959560925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137375941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729224,0.00046757524,0.0000068522986,0.009193605,0.0005186552,0.00016610428,0.000025962263,0.000037508977,0.016661352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983769,0.0002168401,0.00000794184,0.00023839175,0.00084120757,0.0000070294213,0.0000011638924,0.0000035998467,0.00030691925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858725,0.00039537178,0.00014215415,0.00015030621,0.00036005225,0.00036484218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757594,0.0021288183,0.00006402668,0.000043116175,0.00008990529,0.000098216566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000500518,0.0001101795,0.0003254686,0.000024413861,0.004825507,0.000016970358,0.00018583261,0.00006063601,0.00006642653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010569388,0.00006432545,0.00014884146,0.00009203095,0.003350295,0.00013491495,0.0013637013,0.00019235842,0.000004338201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017248178,0.00003526715,0.33531797,0.000023940825,0.00028159074,0.00000439446,0.40951943,5.4052002e-8,0.000001150337,0.25246465,0.0010790213,0.0011000315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004613789,0.00034308515,0.34134454,0.000068812005,0.0008232983,0.000005426286,0.47573987,0.000096036805,0.000103696606,0.17437178,0.0018990207,0.000590659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004200569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095923635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07809288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115304436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020643358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146408989","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00780.x","title":"Latin American Canadians Rethink Their Political Spaces: Grass-Roots or Electoral Participation?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Grassroots; Distrust; Latin Americans; Political science; Disappointment; Focus group; Political economy; Sociology; Political efficacy; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06746378523996524,"score_gpt":0.36434748484191487,"score_spread":0.2968836996019496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146408989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46256188,0.0011398832,0.00002918028,0.28571022,0.00080329075,0.0005357809,0.00019571348,0.0004139221,0.24861011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803181,0.00006331127,0.00007507695,0.0064874296,0.0006459656,0.00001849466,0.0000042349684,0.000010438618,0.012376906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743253,0.00020407677,0.0002478532,0.0002689064,0.00035497508,0.0014916548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811745,0.00043768404,0.000049675877,0.00016593961,0.00015973998,0.0010695412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024488076,0.00014831178,0.00034508746,0.00019530604,0.0012725142,0.00021779357,0.00019266013,0.00007473291,0.0002704473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017990003,0.00014029864,0.00009694911,0.00044752206,0.002550321,0.000118526485,0.000023026038,0.00021274341,0.00016211768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013806721,0.00004787025,0.0044154003,0.000006558264,0.00004225839,0.000027026332,0.0055441633,2.6626418e-7,0.0000023014504,0.96220475,0.025576662,0.0021189023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027755104,0.00034588054,0.23558228,0.00003754628,0.00008876284,0.0000014910755,0.029767431,0.000010750104,0.000009861105,0.07418619,0.6592001,0.0004922139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.799195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8880186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022606354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010350092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97872794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152636297","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00273","title":"Conflicting Equalities? Cultural Group Rights and Sex Equality","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Cultural rights; Subject (documents); Sociology; Inequality; Fundamental rights; Gender equality; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15524163669787802,"score_gpt":0.46572448071801165,"score_spread":0.3104828440201336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152636297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543358,0.000545352,0.0000116551055,0.0034317959,0.00013596275,0.000119779266,0.000010594088,0.0000757223,0.34133336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98655957,0.00012488841,0.00007718796,0.0005800954,0.0005002507,0.000011464868,0.0000029683301,0.000004086394,0.012139504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998426,0.0002629141,0.00020857953,0.00020333457,0.00028426223,0.0006148822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919045,0.0004097026,0.000024800931,0.00007783624,0.000070862734,0.00022637038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004368406,0.00010030323,0.0001839949,0.00001730874,0.0009838219,0.000092907794,0.00007071376,0.000057758003,0.0001852683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018736973,0.00007565944,0.000044853314,0.00006065065,0.0008910156,0.0001324494,0.00004356834,0.00008660912,0.00003123505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017469038,0.000019163332,0.0018202353,0.000015811751,0.00004229291,0.0000016328095,0.03925672,1.9610394e-7,0.0000042299635,0.9576182,0.00027567035,0.0009441321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041584513,0.00005019835,0.00802082,0.000025654848,0.00005312556,0.000003833186,0.17355096,0.000028134049,0.00014878533,0.6102779,0.20708247,0.00034229876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019062046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073769374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3473403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008450883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001607349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154957127","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00958.x","title":"Lockean Toleration: Dialogical not Theological?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dialogical self; Protestantism; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Nonconformity; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Law; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3301795896720684,"score_gpt":0.44989559047925026,"score_spread":0.11971600080718187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154957127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03984803,0.0010445488,0.00014951665,0.12415122,0.0008815221,0.00016140373,0.000011532397,0.00021587977,0.8335363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833113,0.00011565717,0.0001699933,0.011565738,0.003940706,0.000023520408,0.000001474135,0.0000057924426,0.00086579693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746746,0.00040210874,0.00022625709,0.00017492629,0.00042736225,0.0013018707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727225,0.0017909242,0.000023211569,0.00012653985,0.00012682423,0.00066023384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009894514,0.00013324924,0.00025658673,0.000021888307,0.0009126707,0.000037334055,0.0001708983,0.00018389059,0.0003889754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005562118,0.0000946381,0.00010202333,0.00011716486,0.002268081,0.00019295375,0.00013390767,0.00028504114,0.0005060262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000729915,0.000096485106,0.0036006868,0.0000068076206,0.00002483787,0.000002264132,0.0029080638,9.801774e-8,0.0000027495792,0.9922751,0.0008346389,0.00024097475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010790916,0.000051073057,0.011708108,0.000008592496,0.00002954977,0.0000014696815,0.0034739661,0.0000018200085,0.00009433306,0.89275104,0.09157839,0.00019376486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019060733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004968575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94346327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015007156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043208598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83568394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165987554","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00714.x","title":"Civic Engagement and Civic Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: Introduction to the Symposium","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civic engagement; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0868098275855662,"score_gpt":0.4148040372920291,"score_spread":0.32799420970646287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165987554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78758687,0.002236523,0.000007959249,0.18999344,0.0005101298,0.000268827,0.0000036719794,0.000041294712,0.019351302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943698,0.0005962344,0.00001985047,0.0009170037,0.003089656,0.000050941897,4.2566268e-7,0.0000037538477,0.0009523547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883896,0.00016628504,0.00011078415,0.00019750187,0.00033727742,0.00034920406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993109,0.00033723892,0.0000142649205,0.00004639578,0.00020831554,0.00008287932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006441166,0.00007202796,0.0001139892,0.000033498534,0.0010922601,0.00003821499,0.000082386134,0.000034159457,0.000028764252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009584451,0.000052682644,0.000028401142,0.00020566017,0.0007132102,0.00008633159,0.00011065975,0.0001285614,0.000027778417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008588295,0.00005289679,0.049382467,0.000004716889,0.000033143886,0.0000019475935,0.079761796,0.000014803716,0.0000038778467,0.8650089,0.005647957,0.00007890579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022678585,0.00007325701,0.8201347,0.0000127046615,0.000013086269,0.0000025963166,0.07151632,0.000006430915,0.000014759472,0.0716907,0.03612214,0.00018650382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018083567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039682714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005411721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051623978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84008926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168314353","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00481.x","title":"Do (Some) Canadian Voters Punish a Prime Minister for Calling a Snap Election?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Prime minister; Opposition (politics); Politics; General election; Political science; Law; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.10963823443334096,"score_gpt":0.4203678878012823,"score_spread":0.31072965336794134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168314353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7255578,0.001564363,0.0010319987,0.23702982,0.0020934725,0.0020988702,0.00009284968,0.00027477316,0.030256052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957577,0.0000063602415,0.00017941334,0.0021932446,0.0010544246,0.00013483943,0.000003096411,0.000011752749,0.0006591794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980178,0.00008216022,0.00024916284,0.00022161125,0.000223531,0.0012057546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.00027599972,0.000030375111,0.000093277245,0.00021001167,0.0006509003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036318015,0.00012088007,0.00022469678,0.00006520565,0.0009046373,0.00009871192,0.00009857553,0.000100893,0.00001834964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009933905,0.00010776885,0.000093353294,0.00014844036,0.0003492471,0.0001353635,0.0000150279775,0.000092963994,0.000048425853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005764237,0.000023983193,0.0023534498,0.000022240643,0.00004831443,0.0000020602258,0.001737796,0.0000020957614,0.000020316298,0.99503005,0.0005970044,0.00015694338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009565469,0.00038588836,0.0073113577,0.00015023434,0.00013602216,0.0000027896656,0.0047703777,0.000016976228,0.0010422526,0.75406915,0.2305342,0.00062418974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45309794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51860964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2701999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011418164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042737668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.695783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169831876","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00779.x","title":"Concurrent Elections and Voter Turnout: The Effect of the De-Linking of State Elections on Electoral Participation in India's Parliamentary Polls, 1971-2004","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Ceteris paribus; Incentive; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Political economy; State (computer science); Decentralization; Voter turnout; General election; Politics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Demographic economics; Voting; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04050522181947482,"score_gpt":0.4019845213925761,"score_spread":0.3614792995731013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169831876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99330115,0.00042197527,0.000023614699,0.005126936,0.00016271854,0.00038861795,0.000009485996,0.000014358041,0.00055115967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995072,0.000015817433,0.0000025384247,0.00026339275,0.00013035623,0.000045390243,0.0000010950114,0.000004245699,0.000029965226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979919,0.00071893516,0.00033397833,0.00013137762,0.00026821822,0.00055556564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988174,0.00083146465,0.000090218455,0.00009687326,0.00007151776,0.00009255587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006121368,0.00010883434,0.00023974193,0.00005053822,0.00038039847,0.00002123761,0.00008723705,0.000049771275,0.000005408553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060615595,0.0000632074,0.000069064015,0.0003575138,0.0004490949,0.00006095963,0.000019911819,0.00019478786,0.0000013176723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051072235,0.00018617642,0.7755474,0.000058734502,0.00008950149,6.2490193e-7,0.006445873,0.00005791137,0.00055601547,0.21181706,0.00013181377,0.005057818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037478824,0.0010260093,0.9710174,0.00014320637,0.00008292802,6.1092305e-7,0.0004639269,0.00009350225,0.007779713,0.018658044,0.000247069,0.00011278114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009623852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010752102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19547002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002849371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006529051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549702762","doi":"10.1177/0032321716666293","title":"Centripetalism, Consociationalism and Cyprus: The “Adoptability” Question","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Prosperity; Power (physics); Power sharing; Institution; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.06231808926361124,"score_gpt":0.3882607646680093,"score_spread":0.32594267540439803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549702762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33006352,0.010979698,0.00019147838,0.49217713,0.0025080508,0.00093750766,0.00020543182,0.0004607867,0.16247642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945481,0.00076789636,0.00007671467,0.0021058347,0.0007575235,0.000029755696,7.4211323e-7,0.000008177667,0.0017052984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808216,0.00043410968,0.00021663224,0.00022393263,0.0004149847,0.00062818395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689054,0.0024245444,0.00005524198,0.00014919964,0.00027644995,0.00020400537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076151,0.00011464905,0.00018927705,0.000017133438,0.0010825479,0.00003920723,0.00013996621,0.00008525723,0.00007494672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060356506,0.00006739071,0.0000829477,0.00006200016,0.0042523025,0.00012743993,0.00009501147,0.00008731375,0.000051864798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016851392,0.000020105179,0.013238968,0.000007736662,0.000042724336,4.213202e-7,0.01030963,1.1358208e-8,0.0000057392995,0.9717187,0.004327612,0.0003266574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037769094,0.000021692402,0.07969156,0.00004091134,0.0000766545,0.0000015148369,0.030495234,0.0000013054497,0.00003870279,0.3484796,0.54054224,0.00023285346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00258993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015446821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66448456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011230758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015405656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758769579","doi":"10.1177/0032321717723507","title":"Mini-publics and Public Opinion: Two Survey-Based Experiments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; MacEwan University","keywords":"Publics; Legitimacy; Public opinion; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Survey research; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.35120198904806715,"score_gpt":0.5065673476760167,"score_spread":0.1553653586279496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758769579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83764344,0.0023929928,0.00002302608,0.082654096,0.004550083,0.00035602847,0.000090451766,0.00014599484,0.072143875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969936,0.00015262062,0.00012723987,0.0012177847,0.001233703,0.000033261935,0.0000051657635,0.000009713634,0.00022688105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998093,0.00029798504,0.0001692909,0.00020862481,0.00037290738,0.00085819594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977677,0.0011263617,0.00006812895,0.00024405414,0.0002712848,0.0005224975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048409397,0.00012520154,0.00025244206,0.00003594106,0.0023160693,0.00036209525,0.00030172037,0.00008207781,0.00004191165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01127272,0.0001138718,0.000047519366,0.000055830118,0.0025858223,0.00019713068,0.00016841947,0.00010053102,0.000028766493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030541603,0.00004393894,0.36899722,0.000009370185,0.000042927604,0.0000016262888,0.0034542512,3.8606074e-9,0.0000011804606,0.6249206,0.0018687807,0.0006570563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002101484,0.00014784152,0.38961738,0.00006494037,0.000047979003,8.8096164e-7,0.09918723,0.000016396234,0.00034338413,0.073465705,0.43422893,0.0007778318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013571714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029359057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5514549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012368178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022614267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760260117","doi":"10.1177/0032321717722360","title":"Impartiality and the Definition of Corruption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Language change; Politics; Political corruption; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22640879450053558,"score_gpt":0.4267496499605336,"score_spread":0.20034085545999802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760260117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73370254,0.00021657883,0.00003491249,0.031159328,0.00038786637,0.000117287476,0.0000034969892,0.000013779681,0.2343642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909085,0.0003581818,0.00005441792,0.0002027563,0.000078540244,0.000009427087,2.061578e-7,9.129173e-7,0.00020468915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995771,0.00005577902,0.000106358646,0.000057567202,0.00006788259,0.00013527872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995906,0.00018471324,0.000054277287,0.00008061374,0.000047340367,0.000042466287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006725631,0.00002896791,0.00010114869,0.0000063932634,0.0008322046,0.00003922475,0.00006480958,0.000016097734,0.00003485133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012138092,0.000019037703,0.000022731148,0.000007166233,0.0015894761,0.000059297563,0.000072447445,0.000024999801,0.000015393667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012036465,0.0000055442533,0.013972091,0.000004110258,0.0000123161,6.8825464e-8,0.0031368681,1.0451669e-8,8.346531e-7,0.97918344,0.000034321147,0.0036383427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077693776,0.000012193813,0.571627,0.000018211696,0.000028358781,4.9812047e-7,0.01780679,0.000011504362,0.000019149627,0.39891228,0.010708187,0.000078881676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017276445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088434917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5802712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043400392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022891387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6400729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402058","doi":"10.1177/0032321717726919","title":"Communicating Cosmopolitanism and Motivating Global Citizenship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Culpability; Sociology; Action (physics); Global citizenship; Action research; Argument (complex analysis); Collective action; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.22473767706701364,"score_gpt":0.5040316341716451,"score_spread":0.27929395710463145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43461755,0.00067391386,0.00000865555,0.024117965,0.00028760295,0.00006583692,0.000006706907,0.000052388554,0.5401694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755263,0.00012842315,0.00029313812,0.0012917438,0.00042814782,0.000009366928,2.9344446e-7,0.0000041717058,0.00029210173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885094,0.0001711218,0.00014659174,0.00015214863,0.00013856114,0.0005406499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895465,0.0004937462,0.00007102738,0.00022865806,0.00009354503,0.00015834278],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041482487,0.00008340517,0.00019460406,0.0000074213854,0.0034381857,0.00012617877,0.00034378358,0.000069159665,0.000016539216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00552979,0.0000749557,0.000039384257,0.000026054984,0.0028007808,0.000075140306,0.0003589629,0.00011207141,0.000017779294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018262655,0.000008455161,0.100348175,0.000004828205,0.000039143728,0.0000016638327,0.0033834134,1.0654151e-9,0.000004552868,0.89373285,0.00066435593,0.0018107655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017260878,0.000028806735,0.20803982,0.000029044508,0.000010883004,0.0000014401998,0.03628817,0.0000013030308,0.000005817732,0.7526949,0.0026212956,0.00010589598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039003927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079991546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56293505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015140307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018306426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793506630","doi":"10.1177/0032321718761466","title":"Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Public relations; Corporate governance; Faith; Public engagement; Political efficacy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Public trust; Democracy; Public opinion; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06544212779348799,"score_gpt":0.41805282306326375,"score_spread":0.35261069526977573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793506630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9486748,0.00041992782,0.000046559056,0.027923461,0.0005478361,0.00023628992,0.0000117339,0.000073458825,0.022065926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949381,0.000072678224,0.00081642973,0.0018912988,0.002046044,0.000018533876,6.472603e-7,0.000013594555,0.00020268749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973311,0.00032377202,0.00028092248,0.000281424,0.0003426173,0.0014401576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730986,0.0018220686,0.000030705392,0.00009633196,0.00019112973,0.000549884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172106,0.00016734014,0.00034641713,0.000079692545,0.00076257106,0.000042242445,0.00014069233,0.00012934019,0.000042076394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053267386,0.000149614,0.00005164807,0.00024180929,0.002481284,0.00012585116,0.00013596467,0.00020452864,0.00004498084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008936202,0.000052954714,0.056467358,0.000009099235,0.00003784053,0.000005861162,0.013278091,1.3294907e-8,0.0000068441523,0.9290992,0.0002237904,0.00081000564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008399064,0.0001767587,0.081354946,0.0000946263,0.00006700327,0.0000029283271,0.076028466,0.000013834296,0.00047655482,0.82388014,0.01669216,0.00037267752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003254895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010091565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10521906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003626095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015486739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9142395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793592185","doi":"10.1177/0032321718762882","title":"Time and the Fulfillment of Election Pledges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Mandate; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business; Economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.06726927031446683,"score_gpt":0.40259254083817125,"score_spread":0.3353232705237044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793592185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91765994,0.00078681647,0.0000213744,0.031815886,0.00022871324,0.00026411298,0.0000043713585,0.0000346283,0.04918416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790186,0.000015395817,0.000010991352,0.00023091499,0.0005587963,0.000013331275,1.8334411e-7,0.0000021692827,0.001266338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999138,0.00020824873,0.00014076477,0.00007377404,0.00015418496,0.00028505907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991478,0.0005306954,0.000026830117,0.00004968236,0.00017117124,0.00007385243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047421,0.00004461288,0.00014141023,0.000012665556,0.00035667606,0.0000121726835,0.000040191244,0.000026728667,0.00005043737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009774991,0.000025685538,0.00002577274,0.000081645994,0.0027179655,0.000033719654,0.000027055326,0.000031339354,0.00004511409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015517086,0.000010708295,0.0013062445,0.0000069540065,0.000029248817,4.6760263e-8,0.0025686217,2.2714895e-8,0.000045123794,0.9949174,0.0007985795,0.00030151298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002054688,0.00090940547,0.053715818,0.00013572421,0.00027522224,0.0000024303092,0.010065277,0.0003424527,0.008555463,0.8358791,0.0876286,0.0004358367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006932787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002465174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15903834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048574057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020122621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795249882","doi":"10.1177/0032321718763558","title":"What Drives People to Protest in an Authoritarian Country? Resources and Rewards vs Risks of Protests in Urban and Rural China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; China; Government (linguistics); Politics; Accountability; Political science; State (computer science); Survey data collection; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.03673454252769359,"score_gpt":0.3768839610016818,"score_spread":0.3401494184739882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795249882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876711,0.0008661546,4.5365303e-7,0.009664293,0.00010819203,0.00050697505,0.000014548157,0.000012744183,0.0011555464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999078,0.00029105073,0.00010109808,0.00012535513,0.00025826998,0.00005461953,5.0150305e-7,0.000006357056,0.00008477999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885356,0.00009480976,0.00022210622,0.00022758015,0.00015995611,0.0004419727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995074,0.00011393296,0.00005812724,0.00009936299,0.000052084783,0.0001690381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005724491,0.00011369716,0.00032297388,0.000046243025,0.00027412697,0.000099759134,0.00011181957,0.00006972623,0.0000046819496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006568046,0.000090103866,0.000014383325,0.00013610128,0.0008345404,0.00038267305,0.00013115215,0.00011143913,0.0000014919744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038081238,0.00004898691,0.72467077,0.000039162347,0.0000094479,0.0000011656382,0.17050852,2.7071113e-7,0.000015849959,0.103588395,0.000043824497,0.0010355305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024530455,0.00029465824,0.921466,0.00013418714,0.0000042049837,3.433531e-7,0.052496962,0.000016520968,0.000017883911,0.023303917,0.0019024459,0.00011757959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060801327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28030676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21950541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017014754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052686697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94545287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886451041","doi":"10.1177/0032321718791370","title":"Political Leaders and Public Engagement: The Hidden World of Informal Elite–Citizen Interaction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Politics; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Deliberation; Public value; Public administration; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Public participation; Public engagement; Constructive; Deliberative democracy; Law; Economics; Process (computing); Management","score_opus":0.27946642443743164,"score_gpt":0.49150088717568285,"score_spread":0.21203446273825122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886451041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14689635,0.00015832907,0.000018381324,0.18064432,0.00019410976,0.00020049271,0.000017076576,0.000047348458,0.67182356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477303,0.0000453322,0.000040361254,0.0023567392,0.000819277,0.000020853926,0.0000014909771,0.0000039981055,0.0019389032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980108,0.00030627995,0.00024914436,0.00012998842,0.0004313446,0.0008724524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.0011810879,0.000040018753,0.00011317929,0.00028124917,0.00032168455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009917013,0.00008562183,0.00014863888,0.00011570253,0.0008685638,0.00013246082,0.00020271477,0.00004134104,0.0001901826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042696083,0.00005891447,0.000044337678,0.00029556995,0.0051429304,0.00033642678,0.00018171148,0.00020639278,0.000032999927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008219241,0.0000259304,0.0022818656,0.000014853012,0.000053252505,4.3174248e-7,0.0052848128,1.8135228e-9,0.000004031419,0.9886143,0.0016459527,0.002066337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039481398,0.00018955994,0.024350006,0.0000471709,0.00003416559,0.0000031371223,0.31386638,0.00003176496,0.00035418314,0.10905906,0.551461,0.00020877423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012281269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021636626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008811811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020587417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922412555","doi":"10.1177/0032321718819077","title":"Public Opinion, Turnout and Social Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Congruence in European Liberal Democracies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Ideology; Parliament; Turnout; Democracy; Public opinion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Public policy; Public economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.1714765354386686,"score_gpt":0.44177163119033264,"score_spread":0.27029509575166405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922412555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222859,0.0002543646,0.0000043077675,0.03550914,0.00007254422,0.000196728,0.000029187859,0.000027607575,0.041620217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986114,0.000018743538,0.000013046015,0.0005036447,0.00044556253,0.000010066812,0.000005090646,0.0000047424355,0.00038769748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770236,0.0006913414,0.00038970629,0.0002099169,0.00029171395,0.000714967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.0005151266,0.00008858915,0.00008560024,0.00024133334,0.00017756534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000566824,0.00012251052,0.00055460155,0.00035475974,0.00024191856,0.000058396785,0.00012280131,0.000053877222,0.000024030996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096613634,0.00010486808,0.000090484406,0.0011668194,0.0009748938,0.0001781623,0.000094807685,0.00010679575,0.000022930664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004981072,0.000032624743,0.21280716,0.00002483311,0.00019195736,3.5404875e-7,0.01409778,0.0000015904567,0.000022481494,0.77265054,0.000073836425,0.00009186836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002911723,0.00007837833,0.9580325,0.000030561936,0.00008189288,2.5752303e-7,0.008224444,0.000080007885,0.000023665047,0.029655982,0.0033042028,0.000196923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038831364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120487055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74522537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026811138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019311545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965916949","doi":"10.1177/0032321719865111","title":"Calling It Quits: Legislative Retirements in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Devolution (biology); Normative; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Democracy; Face (sociological concept); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2936772604246386,"score_gpt":0.5168762393651253,"score_spread":0.22319897894048668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965916949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6634854,0.00037663913,0.000012263052,0.014169737,0.00029482227,0.00046001456,0.0000064590154,0.000037169113,0.3211575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997276,0.000009051089,0.000029329723,0.0005006564,0.00021082154,0.00003820187,8.903639e-7,0.000005294773,0.001929729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800545,0.00035775607,0.00027062965,0.00024327032,0.0003540882,0.0007687944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.0007025477,0.000043792406,0.00008510652,0.00029357907,0.00016799434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004456373,0.0001164158,0.00033474131,0.000050728515,0.00020778846,0.0000323895,0.000095572475,0.00006328961,0.00013249162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007579494,0.00010025848,0.000049957358,0.00023587293,0.00039853668,0.00016679455,0.000044426324,0.00015478751,0.0003448863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009657995,0.000041612137,0.09268603,0.000010507884,0.00003740107,0.000001395657,0.037751716,0.0000035490068,0.000017612942,0.86916006,0.0002734329,0.0000070572573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014324781,0.0005253328,0.1630477,0.00052413566,0.000067172456,5.405679e-7,0.43966234,0.00037510446,0.00040244876,0.3617293,0.031380843,0.00085258705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041676443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021228267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50743073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010520987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008978226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99663174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981900083","doi":"10.1177/0032321719880316","title":"Glass Cliffs or Partisan Pressure? Examining Gender and Party Leader Tenures and Exits","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Dalhousie University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Position (finance); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.25187649936658646,"score_gpt":0.4225138777631914,"score_spread":0.17063737839660492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981900083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93124557,0.0048552225,0.000013301762,0.005245831,0.00041354826,0.00033728912,0.000012564149,0.00006418733,0.057812493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944423,0.00032438373,0.00007958661,0.00070127676,0.00028137842,0.000016908216,8.847582e-7,0.000008287014,0.004145008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986006,0.00014059267,0.00015837466,0.00026617246,0.00025499158,0.00057927147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910766,0.0004759198,0.000030879415,0.00009296719,0.00007329861,0.00021927428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002511846,0.000109262706,0.00020591608,0.000027694725,0.00035329149,0.00007740038,0.000057534297,0.000070804126,0.00006127875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044114664,0.000076210505,0.000019488936,0.000056779063,0.00065896905,0.00010609842,0.00010816938,0.0000857299,0.000016858974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013612512,0.00003743923,0.23437722,0.00013622527,0.00018750656,0.000005334329,0.030208398,0.000001252662,0.000048328362,0.73221517,0.002109149,0.0006603571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008426068,0.00015428607,0.61636657,0.00005246955,0.00019183938,0.000008422877,0.22518925,0.000101656435,0.00023779646,0.060552888,0.0958703,0.000431886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007273438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024037204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6716623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021244901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037378348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31077743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994141134","doi":"10.1177/0032321719881812","title":"How is Political Violence Gendered? Disentangling Motives, Forms, and Impacts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Politics; Hegemony; Political violence; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Gender studies; Poison control; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06463667915082799,"score_gpt":0.37460902212929115,"score_spread":0.30997234297846316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994141134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848574,0.0027292855,0.000067055575,0.036994487,0.0003831855,0.0004232496,0.000058185495,0.00008807406,0.07439905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968415,0.0005083398,0.00008431556,0.001198301,0.00033137974,0.000008934679,0.0000025698607,0.000011373825,0.0010133045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978073,0.00008934271,0.00016341025,0.00031794928,0.00040895812,0.0012130066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998784,0.00033653743,0.000035708556,0.0001443531,0.00013954825,0.0005598689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018081123,0.00015168033,0.00024846708,0.00004886781,0.00040895888,0.00016347413,0.00011326618,0.00008297511,0.0000287437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000536913,0.000119677694,0.00007285512,0.0000942569,0.00069956493,0.00022380077,0.00014673064,0.00012353163,0.000033543212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027600563,0.000024226225,0.065417275,0.000041404222,0.00005592854,0.0000030401047,0.004571205,5.0638945e-8,0.000020632973,0.9295185,0.00011916897,0.00022578139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042355043,0.000081092905,0.049183033,0.00009056967,0.000061877516,0.000005419054,0.24982439,0.00006618475,0.00083052204,0.69641703,0.0026867872,0.00032952827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009866207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000075338954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24525319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020322987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008160369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48803148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015893541","doi":"10.1177/0032321719895428","title":"Electoral Systems and Policy Congruence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Legislature; Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Elite; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Survey data collection; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Democracy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15170445468747668,"score_gpt":0.4351668922640535,"score_spread":0.2834624375765768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015893541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68628,0.0046480177,0.00012151252,0.27269232,0.00046532822,0.0005950654,0.000025504496,0.00032827043,0.03484397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959049,0.000022954739,0.00001365114,0.002153562,0.0015660644,0.000023966744,5.906206e-7,0.0000063749376,0.00030788386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984955,0.0002013529,0.00019675617,0.00017935628,0.0002416505,0.0006853473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885684,0.00032440628,0.000027480419,0.000051851748,0.00013584257,0.0006035592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018434151,0.000093894974,0.00023031357,0.000021476577,0.00035938897,0.00007941056,0.00007559703,0.000054895198,0.000012534145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025804439,0.0000786572,0.000028439967,0.00020699002,0.0005903528,0.00010394387,0.00004481366,0.00008607464,0.0000646848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036639005,0.0000065443737,0.024917774,0.00004201309,0.000021729838,0.0000021207222,0.0014506021,5.2340994e-7,0.00004600868,0.9724951,0.0009176296,0.000096307245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018763186,0.0015379154,0.13344334,0.000332212,0.0002817805,0.000012799409,0.028762883,0.0012730771,0.00094604207,0.21104378,0.6183456,0.0021442522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036915965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011838126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013448522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010928267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96949726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020115569","doi":"10.1177/0032321720906581","title":"Policy Polarization, Income Inequality and Turnout","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Inequality; Polarization (electrochemistry); Economic inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Income distribution; Political science; Politics; Voting","score_opus":0.13184710532918809,"score_gpt":0.43252802426081965,"score_spread":0.30068091893163157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020115569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7265196,0.0005046136,0.00021521366,0.25979584,0.00011408552,0.0002332918,0.000020548401,0.00015903728,0.012437749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941632,0.000013016,0.000040131803,0.0044238446,0.0011647646,0.0000106731,0.0000014931018,0.0000059234726,0.00017695337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985902,0.0002602701,0.00023029212,0.00016395884,0.00023244682,0.00052284286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989262,0.0003151941,0.00003107865,0.00005902772,0.00014364872,0.0005248276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002619443,0.00008717953,0.0002067665,0.000024698633,0.0003974179,0.00005017001,0.00006809329,0.00006024845,0.00002124224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052660923,0.000073147516,0.000029994098,0.0002580662,0.00047215432,0.00011657484,0.00006990339,0.00008633182,0.0000446452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027695332,0.000007828823,0.19021977,0.000032409713,0.000016234102,5.951133e-7,0.002788487,1.09190786e-7,0.000025940257,0.80669457,0.00008168105,0.00012962529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497689,0.00023060525,0.5082424,0.000057694095,0.00006385647,9.411789e-7,0.005067124,0.00007667128,0.00022841728,0.4614982,0.023550946,0.00048544173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015068438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010772226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34519637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100524885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008943752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021063476","doi":"10.1177/0032321720911566","title":"The Dark Side of Politics: Participation and the Dark Triad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Narcissism; Dark triad; Psychopathy; Politics; Machiavellianism; Personality; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Normative; Great Rift; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14757661849009704,"score_gpt":0.43137893760802554,"score_spread":0.2838023191179285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021063476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5233629,0.010252895,0.000077903394,0.32612896,0.0006334475,0.00037829886,0.00007973564,0.000046818088,0.13903908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889667,0.00009873084,0.000018906227,0.010311373,0.00036332392,0.000052935793,0.0000013592852,0.0000080366835,0.00024868597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984313,0.00040170705,0.0003389853,0.00020631775,0.00013778628,0.00048389833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683625,0.002700307,0.000064126754,0.00018802073,0.00007418797,0.00013709863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043852458,0.00011476862,0.00030517986,0.000010568138,0.00026726993,0.000017452528,0.00014789001,0.000051571606,0.00003673268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001172792,0.000057327314,0.00007762501,0.000080001846,0.0019165637,0.000019362737,0.00007379439,0.00015453906,0.000035520006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023453702,0.00003667737,0.0022938845,0.000017783901,0.00031459684,0.0000022635745,0.008273799,1.06091015e-7,0.000008569936,0.9789456,0.007963971,0.0019081761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006711216,0.00064412464,0.35094234,0.00002740673,0.00046184222,0.000015945798,0.030822515,0.00003919102,0.00009589347,0.5098515,0.10006509,0.00032292964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020744134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030152747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46909416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012340933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128869115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7061659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123517388","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12065","title":"The Problem of Pluralist Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; State (computer science); Politics; Primary authority; Traditional authority; Political authority; Political science; Moral authority; Public authority; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13688601380641846,"score_gpt":0.41377943162889486,"score_spread":0.2768934178224764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016376348,0.0008998941,0.000010490309,0.3012045,0.0001942186,0.00026762602,0.00000853117,0.0000633614,0.680975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972668,0.00011866359,0.00017532692,0.00074937404,0.00037244926,0.00003402193,2.105863e-7,0.0000034158375,0.0012797051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.00020450163,0.00020908215,0.00010090761,0.00032438635,0.0006398158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973855,0.0019575679,0.000029884357,0.000104067876,0.00031208302,0.00021089753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006116953,0.00006934234,0.00015158499,0.000010023219,0.0009931215,0.000040922947,0.0002033592,0.000068191395,0.000038772414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018891364,0.000041374147,0.00006545003,0.00009721449,0.0036216204,0.000093782546,0.00009621693,0.00017277355,0.00010501455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011846058,0.000018518153,0.00039956867,0.000017178594,0.000027086913,2.1361794e-7,0.0019828822,3.2418097e-8,0.0000028194224,0.99520224,0.0018302044,0.0005180679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003848701,0.000019708601,0.0021870658,0.000011309681,0.000010758109,1.1211341e-7,0.0062543023,0.0000016341062,0.000048152655,0.9452041,0.046169374,0.00005502253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007807704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045201217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008088458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068073605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152511","doi":"10.1177/0032321720981491","title":"The Role of Self-Interest in Deliberation: A Theory of Deliberative Capital","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Divestment; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Facilitator; Social capital; Capital (architecture); Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Democracy; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06064784188447204,"score_gpt":0.3592029060114349,"score_spread":0.29855506412696287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124152511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962151,0.005737403,0.0000048253914,0.0039221314,0.0002611565,0.00009362009,0.000011151917,0.000014288513,0.02780446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989462,0.00039933162,0.000088821995,0.00014612204,0.00022428227,0.000015153985,6.3288405e-7,0.0000037809673,0.0001756893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874616,0.00044363926,0.00024138752,0.000085524276,0.00016042139,0.0003228644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967439,0.0026985393,0.000041442956,0.0000763716,0.00036894964,0.000070808375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028605512,0.000060517654,0.00018725415,0.000015883275,0.00021954256,0.000013654474,0.00009228182,0.000048111397,0.000019681205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028012972,0.000044404555,0.000057889643,0.00014179572,0.000878482,0.00004350017,0.000059345002,0.000083405066,0.0000041884887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004442451,0.000047881167,0.005565339,0.0000070757956,0.00006173393,0.0000020642783,0.07200615,8.027605e-8,0.00003660617,0.92131245,0.00003418828,0.00092197733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009595324,0.000024052177,0.0024106444,0.000019232823,0.000020234227,3.4958535e-7,0.38513005,0.0000018326741,0.006125316,0.60274214,0.003382782,0.00004740389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005126536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004453026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3185703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008776932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023847084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3353617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137093276","doi":"10.1177/0032321721996941","title":"The Grammar of Social Power: Power-to, Power-with, Power-despite and Power-over","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022562953300177376,"score_gpt":0.33760379974430127,"score_spread":0.3150408464441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137093276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8361067,0.0026465906,0.000018627527,0.040944796,0.0008332532,0.00037017756,0.0000970923,0.00011230239,0.11887042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534255,0.00022654032,0.00009249829,0.0016638734,0.00014148826,0.000022999133,0.0000023282482,0.000023441837,0.0024842594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968495,0.0002917089,0.0004064031,0.00043337262,0.0008465046,0.0011725296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997863,0.0007879229,0.00011073547,0.000199895,0.00066231325,0.0003761479],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048022287,0.00029339766,0.0005418953,0.000034469398,0.002175201,0.00017745308,0.0003112274,0.00017924474,0.00020420544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014443899,0.00019400763,0.00020151428,0.00054498203,0.0022826183,0.00015078041,0.00035361733,0.00026978127,0.000040203347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004577827,0.00008264599,0.003890553,0.000011405917,0.0002621233,0.000021789492,0.033520814,9.145997e-8,0.000100859084,0.9594339,0.0022198488,0.00041019116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010353262,0.0008651562,0.2209254,0.000091691174,0.00017839146,0.000010945487,0.39973825,9.047301e-7,0.00016846076,0.11044326,0.2655719,0.0009703055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005494435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001829019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022164342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019370389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160584821","doi":"10.1177/0032321721996939","title":"Shared Membership Beyond National Identity: Deservingness and Solidarity in Diverse Societies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Solidarity; Obligation; Feeling; National identity; Social psychology; Identity (music); Salient; Sociology; Political science; Collective identity; Immigration; Gender studies; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1168210598118165,"score_gpt":0.41268066243432805,"score_spread":0.29585960262251154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160584821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835566,0.0029855845,0.000053966316,0.015801901,0.0003751783,0.00014624797,0.00003915019,0.000055032106,0.096986316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996859,0.00033442938,0.00014961195,0.00085213024,0.00022631965,0.0000147753135,0.000009966682,0.0000031641273,0.001550595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988109,0.00016380294,0.00015253678,0.00017177894,0.0004303577,0.0002706526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910766,0.00025975116,0.000024080267,0.00004519486,0.00048134298,0.000081979386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005246606,0.00007261074,0.00014493741,0.000034586134,0.00051114504,0.00013827029,0.00007251182,0.000065693486,0.00018695493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026806286,0.000068442234,0.000039184983,0.0001791241,0.0004212132,0.0005191222,0.00009877597,0.00009087196,0.000011539981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021415,0.000032260254,0.02497914,0.000027050064,0.000022344471,0.000002402762,0.017509153,2.8500187e-7,0.000014093417,0.9547931,0.002557676,0.000060329203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010254,0.000010801012,0.05622302,0.00003197628,0.000018429913,8.4484975e-7,0.10635755,0.00004491385,0.00014860404,0.83201265,0.004817239,0.0001329684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013986109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0743087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1227805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023801999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000173003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169444523","doi":"10.1177/00323217211018127","title":"The Flying Heads of Settler Colonialism; or the Ideological Erasures of Indigenous Peoples in Political Theorizing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Indigenous; Colonialism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Mythology; Sociology; Gender studies; Race (biology); Political science; Law; History; Ecology","score_opus":0.06344543621993322,"score_gpt":0.39902134240168013,"score_spread":0.33557590618174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169444523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619384,0.0037519096,0.000009997271,0.019950379,0.000537047,0.00038236607,0.00001714272,0.000019977091,0.013392796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465173,0.003735279,0.00007535355,0.00029106406,0.0004306703,0.000011737202,0.0000013750895,0.000007013696,0.00079575216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966771,0.0010750117,0.0005118489,0.00018940454,0.00044212647,0.0011044999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917842,0.007372962,0.0000902526,0.00019252108,0.00042135434,0.00013866615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017396539,0.000120745375,0.00037203138,0.00003704156,0.0047093793,0.00003269832,0.0002800594,0.00011755053,0.000033485154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012313087,0.00005085379,0.00008974058,0.00033426302,0.0024972314,0.00004774435,0.000018204284,0.00021707402,0.0000045060074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020336136,0.00010082758,0.0112053,0.000048717342,0.000039309976,0.000005000774,0.2076486,3.2578802e-7,0.000003568419,0.7808372,0.000018608229,0.000072252835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037329356,0.00021891006,0.08291781,0.0001608916,0.00007909124,0.000014816707,0.53814554,0.0000026674093,0.0014674059,0.32422054,0.05213965,0.00025939904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058699697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6313878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57268816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024697924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006479332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181236798","doi":"10.1177/00323217211026189","title":"Winning, Losing, and the Quality of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Manchester; University of Oxford","keywords":"Democracy; Victory; Salience (neuroscience); Quality (philosophy); Direct democracy; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17132817119918126,"score_gpt":0.47918037959249626,"score_spread":0.307852208393315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181236798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88036275,0.0038032045,0.00005612387,0.0772989,0.00017835536,0.00012805495,0.0000048875386,0.000025992338,0.038141757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982617,0.00003996186,0.000042604155,0.0005942596,0.0002121661,0.00000685924,3.589327e-7,0.0000025475986,0.00083953195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984358,0.0006442922,0.00025553184,0.00010070121,0.00023211799,0.0003315599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978697,0.001656118,0.000046669757,0.00008273888,0.0002409451,0.000103835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009273899,0.00005211607,0.00023312905,0.000007679905,0.00039730163,0.00002379196,0.000046649344,0.000033422708,0.000037309375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005326342,0.000033016662,0.000049927534,0.00010299189,0.0015361853,0.00004555709,0.000054094024,0.00006145777,0.000005829696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064248966,0.000014698352,0.048947293,0.000029480701,0.000032585827,5.3368706e-7,0.0019455707,6.384563e-8,0.000031209165,0.9486518,0.00019993327,0.00014038461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006857589,0.000025494013,0.09733952,0.00006005289,0.00006597523,9.855968e-7,0.008485406,0.0000096602125,0.001204103,0.8821875,0.009801867,0.00013372338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011274145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028336754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117898986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040526353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059518276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204369362","doi":"10.1177/00323217211049294","title":"Making the Paris Agreement: Historical Processes and the Drivers of Institutional Design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Cardiff University","keywords":"Gridlock; Agreement; Treaty; Political science; State (computer science); Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15289536635235412,"score_gpt":0.3936076475450433,"score_spread":0.24071228119268917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204369362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066879573,0.019768307,0.009524658,0.10434265,0.00030625222,0.00036344634,0.000011841947,0.000025725123,0.85896915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972923,0.0005432372,0.00025738697,0.00045371387,0.00014991105,0.000014719408,2.9548184e-7,0.0000012243537,0.0012872288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930024,0.00011817326,0.00011324572,0.00006815279,0.00025375275,0.00014645972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984163,0.0011935055,0.000031219624,0.0000408114,0.00029386472,0.000024269233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032565315,0.000038726277,0.000084838524,0.000012911869,0.00072723546,0.000020031066,0.0000748879,0.00002007671,0.000032942167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002769636,0.000020506162,0.000029741901,0.00012222498,0.00129774,0.00004507828,0.00006354726,0.00005579855,0.0000036454753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056663275,0.000012918611,0.00083312683,0.000007189739,0.000055971246,0.0000011056045,0.005196283,0.0000065482477,2.8898555e-7,0.99268234,0.0010193675,0.00017920583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036198113,0.000016089689,0.0033060296,0.000041337124,0.00007472014,0.0000038150165,0.01297979,0.00007144619,0.00003735753,0.88911164,0.09392269,0.00007311205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004076976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009835784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99060434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020395698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020634399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5593381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207022422","doi":"10.1177/00323217211046329","title":"Policy Preferences Influence Vote Choice When A New Party Emerges: Evidence from the 2017 French Presidential Election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Victory; Instant-runoff voting; Political science; Presidential election; Voting; Group voting ticket; Presidential system; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.17322287594142816,"score_gpt":0.43960503093448594,"score_spread":0.2663821549930578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207022422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88427514,0.006697546,0.00018564553,0.10237861,0.0007722872,0.00038507,0.000027745458,0.00014289054,0.0051350696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900902,0.00021136786,0.0000624203,0.0013513486,0.0039054723,0.000057956273,0.000003809011,0.000008093905,0.004309349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967663,0.0007997301,0.00040978563,0.0003964006,0.0006643437,0.0009633823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598384,0.0026984406,0.00009828418,0.0002844245,0.00053107657,0.00040395578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041924271,0.00018012208,0.00029575184,0.000027107057,0.0010444334,0.00024364806,0.00032659975,0.00011987589,0.00013354195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015749292,0.00012715842,0.00010474503,0.00035536085,0.00054985285,0.0004880344,0.00015004908,0.00023069755,0.000105095045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018100442,0.000097661345,0.42249525,0.000058096666,0.0003474338,0.0000063573502,0.014206771,0.000014925052,0.0007371447,0.44441226,0.11609604,0.0015099805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017521202,0.00007663058,0.6341241,0.00029682575,0.00014157884,9.970604e-7,0.0012815051,0.000016666785,0.0011708856,0.32921508,0.033210877,0.00028962322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7371222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48232186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25480032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009749142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214186904","doi":"10.1177/00323217211055560","title":"What Kind of Electoral Outcome do People Think is Good for Democracy?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; Austrian Science Fund; Vetenskapsrådet; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Electoral system; Outcome (game theory); Representative democracy; Focus (optics); Survey data collection; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14309155121898853,"score_gpt":0.45510622666843537,"score_spread":0.31201467544944683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214186904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9089009,0.003966626,0.00018597025,0.078991875,0.0015507191,0.0005136445,0.000060014325,0.0000739793,0.005756244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960399,0.000039900948,0.00016209159,0.00096746534,0.0005409244,0.0000344467,0.0000038858734,0.000010512476,0.0022008223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979769,0.00018610811,0.00042348463,0.00023088578,0.000362444,0.0008201706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791163,0.001075374,0.00006868101,0.00014600252,0.0005593765,0.00023892477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042099456,0.00012198383,0.0004298656,0.000026130681,0.00042690188,0.000101805155,0.000108954024,0.00009966536,0.00014476023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020777814,0.00010412868,0.00016747677,0.00022785617,0.00026443883,0.000244392,0.000057777484,0.00008848424,0.000030470632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005903761,0.00006349114,0.15941529,0.00009643707,0.00007371557,0.0000010347111,0.0038791187,1.8313123e-7,0.000046541063,0.83509654,0.0010531903,0.0002685494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000953003,0.0003478335,0.120493226,0.00021910817,0.00031167435,0.0000025666104,0.029897906,0.000046974652,0.006242035,0.7992704,0.041582774,0.0006324902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034957393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008812654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087139025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015694284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013855673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5284535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212902376","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12072","title":"Emergency Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"State of exception; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; State of emergency; Law; State (computer science); Exceptionalism; Norm (philosophy); Member state; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Member states; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.08550792841367942,"score_gpt":0.38008325915230745,"score_spread":0.294575330738628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212902376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041061603,0.0009510723,0.000013144904,0.014444777,0.00035867063,0.00008586304,0.0000031042855,0.00008064939,0.9430011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95566034,0.0013072855,0.00005006341,0.001849096,0.00060392974,0.000010932773,1.7905377e-7,0.0000068173817,0.04051134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892265,0.00013824592,0.00013716608,0.0001190449,0.00018988774,0.00049302186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994086,0.00011428666,0.000025490472,0.00009178548,0.00018295235,0.00017689717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015210808,0.00006549384,0.00009653271,0.000013831347,0.00036563465,0.00002066686,0.00014837562,0.000018262639,0.0008963944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020898895,0.000052793996,0.000034998768,0.00015238952,0.00035836134,0.00012478024,0.000078017874,0.00006602919,0.0030241823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1838312e-7,0.000013374897,0.003168645,0.0000039322085,0.000011790467,0.0000011944226,0.0013864875,3.1786445e-8,0.0000059900303,0.95382,0.041191466,0.00039676667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059551152,0.000018825025,0.11330437,0.000008892466,0.0000069128637,2.9973853e-7,0.0027284536,7.172448e-7,0.00003847539,0.07559113,0.8081156,0.00012679804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003532658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020892928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91459876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003536489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020086938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238600222","doi":"10.1177/0032321720964666","title":"Constraining Denaturalization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3394719977652889,"score_gpt":0.4554833585132848,"score_spread":0.1160113607479959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238600222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071123512,0.0007216972,0.00033511076,0.44448292,0.00025021256,0.00009756705,0.0000093341805,0.00021706661,0.54677373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788408,0.00004956305,0.00015301508,0.019940298,0.00095116015,0.0000033125546,9.4577376e-7,0.000003927161,0.0000569607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894696,0.00011321927,0.000120567376,0.00012318876,0.00023130229,0.0004647799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989013,0.000564851,0.000013879938,0.000035459856,0.00011251054,0.00037197393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017612516,0.00006212809,0.0001271176,0.000009759409,0.00043089167,0.00002670166,0.00008953193,0.00006620448,0.000055817705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006388033,0.00005439503,0.000040278213,0.0001208374,0.0012298034,0.00008631862,0.000047052683,0.00015348755,0.00010563733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020916107,0.0000049705172,0.00041667317,0.000013106706,0.00001843521,0.0000032258295,0.008786056,3.1150884e-7,0.000003551336,0.9900688,0.0005081293,0.00017463195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012847639,0.000034102475,0.00037285878,0.00001831707,0.00002499067,4.221682e-7,0.021719513,0.000035147474,0.0000857782,0.92778844,0.049649134,0.00014280413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012568112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022583572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97172844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000575711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000655512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76475334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13798997686747863,"score_gpt":0.4396970784488198,"score_spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243315529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04081483,0.00047338713,0.00016568966,0.012521294,0.00012960183,0.00009340087,0.0000028833358,0.00006866242,0.94573027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970873,0.00013912497,0.00025546458,0.00072511693,0.00014285027,0.000020380447,3.7468456e-7,0.0000020010814,0.0016273963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993776,0.00005995395,0.00007457165,0.000086407206,0.000120281824,0.0002812016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964416,0.00011676032,0.000010053048,0.000064668,0.000062007304,0.000102379716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020357294,0.000036830956,0.000061584615,0.0000098618775,0.00059552764,0.000019862888,0.00005111978,0.000023080482,0.000022234575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001148457,0.000030782096,0.000025030567,0.00009049773,0.000416523,0.000045802197,0.00001672319,0.000045373043,0.00014424251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1462054e-7,0.00001380222,0.0007058829,0.0000018204046,0.0000064281335,4.78882e-7,0.0005520725,4.3511525e-7,0.0000074787204,0.9977244,0.0007790796,0.00020787881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043875116,0.0000040403866,0.00094635214,0.0000040407213,0.00000542824,1.2576383e-7,0.004328618,0.0000010135981,0.00009905951,0.14072196,0.8537935,0.000051996536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031522923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024890402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104707906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005610008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45803776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252357135","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00755.x","title":"Patriotic Virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dartmouth College","keywords":"Virtue; Liberalism; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criticism; Sociology; Patriotism; Classical liberalism; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21251296162175656,"score_gpt":0.4166120778362671,"score_spread":0.20409911621451052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252357135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072396815,0.0014365049,0.000055310455,0.0816564,0.0006108693,0.00013687518,0.000011390716,0.00023269266,0.8434631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993165,0.00026467332,0.00009220263,0.004059285,0.0011161122,0.000007879864,4.4711064e-7,0.0000065533827,0.0012878443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983539,0.00016747415,0.00016622969,0.00016379966,0.0003817018,0.0007668995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982832,0.0010533263,0.000015159619,0.00011171212,0.00013775106,0.00039887018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030871894,0.00009522402,0.00019871998,0.00002951936,0.001188172,0.000012268053,0.00014664863,0.00009903614,0.000053828968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040231473,0.00008098788,0.000083325365,0.00013763637,0.0027936469,0.000092244416,0.000073799936,0.0002142799,0.00043264555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025166944,0.000034953824,0.0013125136,0.000008794607,0.000025840469,0.000025269626,0.0028206815,1.234766e-7,0.0000011723189,0.9947416,0.00096703146,0.00005948318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116389885,0.000037611524,0.0032130866,0.000012064228,0.000018710365,0.0000040613277,0.0034333398,0.000001749668,0.00004505,0.9538611,0.03910884,0.00014795299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010315581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010681787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016379435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013366541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283775561","doi":"10.1177/00323217221105170","title":"Revisiting Elite Perceptions as Mediator of Elite Responsiveness to Public Opinion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Research Council; Universiteit Antwerpen","keywords":"Elite; Delegate; Perception; Politics; Public opinion; Representation (politics); Political science; Action (physics); Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.12439182780098013,"score_gpt":0.44466759501859854,"score_spread":0.3202757672176184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283775561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9064328,0.0015293404,0.000047995778,0.07313338,0.0007174862,0.00044122012,0.00007748266,0.00009015767,0.017530154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727166,0.00006529748,0.00005644692,0.0010417429,0.00083595194,0.0001809631,0.000006290095,0.000009669934,0.0005320015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706686,0.0009594211,0.00038971266,0.00021698659,0.0006311607,0.0007358897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980367,0.0009829802,0.00006479277,0.00014372116,0.00036172665,0.0004100994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013039217,0.00009856858,0.00028056157,0.000106569336,0.0011277396,0.000034885397,0.00016976162,0.00003703996,0.00045714877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005672975,0.00009476642,0.00008902627,0.00051135296,0.00027387665,0.00010531098,0.00020872234,0.00013439264,0.00008782179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016040847,0.000035775283,0.012318681,0.000040429444,0.000028920535,0.0000011006163,0.0044712494,0.000002866544,0.00022847275,0.98100424,0.0006163308,0.0012359029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040860233,0.0004374013,0.13268305,0.00023511612,0.00006900015,0.0000038161515,0.06857919,0.00002174935,0.00021026212,0.08203412,0.7147242,0.00059351826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004727595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029015314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004826867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020123398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8673775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378215977","doi":"10.1177/00323217231173800","title":"Populist Democrats? Unpacking the Relationship Between Populist and Democratic Attitudes at the Citizen Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Populism; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Representative democracy; Political science; Direct democracy; Political economy; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.36296507800102873,"score_gpt":0.4560002516589876,"score_spread":0.09303517365795888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378215977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8851913,0.0007458981,0.000015275007,0.10411855,0.00035556126,0.00042052678,0.00007041863,0.0002181019,0.008864331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98802936,0.000084104984,0.000048376452,0.0013313309,0.00069094123,0.00006080581,0.000015213767,0.00002235704,0.009717521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969269,0.0005775997,0.0003873393,0.00035729707,0.00071960816,0.0010312396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993669,0.005617604,0.0000946394,0.00030120515,0.000098223376,0.00021933964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015847887,0.00021973105,0.00031457478,0.000062769024,0.0065537905,0.00019833131,0.0004340803,0.00009614533,0.000026100774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005454391,0.00012573804,0.000093144685,0.00055273663,0.0021537323,0.00016180352,0.00056038337,0.0002878451,0.0001978994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020054508,0.000006749452,0.66103727,0.000018878307,0.00007742231,0.000003909677,0.0036193694,4.9778333e-7,0.0000017317707,0.3280396,0.00700148,0.00019109542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001178702,0.000010994989,0.71334594,0.000043367232,0.00007436305,7.520968e-7,0.005171953,0.0000025904048,0.0000074663735,0.279236,0.0018546182,0.00013408285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00283641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009016526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10283801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042202312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062420055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99473953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391051768","doi":"10.1177/00323217231223400","title":"Minority Affirmations and the Boundaries of the Nation: Evidence From Québec","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Ethnic group; Salient; Social psychology; Sociology; Nationalism; Construct (python library); Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11316003091109915,"score_gpt":0.41706582571939504,"score_spread":0.3039057948082959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391051768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35187095,0.042083707,0.000032188975,0.5555954,0.0019857797,0.00017644805,0.000018540779,0.00004680016,0.048190214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797964,0.0003129359,0.000009850114,0.0005749857,0.0004377975,0.000016067492,9.713799e-8,0.0000012145264,0.0006673942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932647,0.00020365488,0.00010879867,0.0000802465,0.00015087244,0.00012993728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744326,0.0023777355,0.000015974214,0.00006174984,0.00007744632,0.000023855102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028483733,0.000039088478,0.00009590841,0.000007658763,0.0008456718,0.00008697837,0.00012004501,0.000027366095,0.00004800746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026909462,0.00001911045,0.000049825398,0.00010747841,0.0059552155,0.00008261881,0.0000775387,0.000074049734,0.000010793906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037954394,0.0000044825592,0.0033425903,0.000007861421,0.000049182847,1.243863e-7,0.048987657,8.859501e-9,0.0000024368837,0.9432042,0.0038159832,0.00058164337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116657866,0.000015575792,0.06988644,0.00010622002,0.00009120253,4.6921457e-7,0.04630457,0.000015355725,0.000030163661,0.7008723,0.18249604,0.000064973014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1568673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09676063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6461087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006298064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013629324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408468988","doi":"10.1177/00323217251324025","title":"Perceived Democraticness of Parties From Citizens’ Perspectives: Evidence From Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.09630308236206331,"score_gpt":0.39963906023977985,"score_spread":0.30333597787771654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408468988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708696,0.0039830524,0.000042320327,0.017768815,0.00036708577,0.00015944804,0.00006731386,0.000032357093,0.006709995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984945,0.000059669295,0.000060055347,0.0003638308,0.00031111392,0.0000324169,0.0000021836827,0.0000043549917,0.00067186076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981268,0.00036839992,0.00034644318,0.00023577866,0.00038231106,0.00054024387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607205,0.0031551945,0.000052772728,0.00014986032,0.00039976026,0.00017035689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018311015,0.00012042481,0.00038169863,0.000025075016,0.00038031559,0.000030193072,0.0001612676,0.0000633707,0.00014699287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004586264,0.00010257671,0.00005964347,0.00017703313,0.00074007903,0.000094543866,0.00005905414,0.000095453004,0.0000078948615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002388619,0.000044202603,0.1860262,0.000048117527,0.00026752282,0.0000034608856,0.021680173,0.0000024148146,0.0003555401,0.78775245,0.003654781,0.0001412682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020935068,0.00003894105,0.63200057,0.0006419839,0.00017678698,3.5220086e-8,0.13728258,0.00003960112,0.0015848037,0.22653784,0.0012477478,0.00023976022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9452223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5612146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005958495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067404297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54905176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408552092","doi":"10.1177/00323217251323404","title":"Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; State (computer science); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.030700481378550807,"score_gpt":0.40324842165232266,"score_spread":0.37254794027377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408552092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34823787,0.013700788,0.0002632567,0.12248751,0.00049255876,0.00021811684,0.0000141671835,0.000053986943,0.51453173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309266,0.0025290127,0.000036552603,0.0018181358,0.000018878405,0.000008211969,1.3237799e-7,0.0000012537035,0.0024951508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.000087954584,0.00011855461,0.00006819774,0.000104749415,0.00018373263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877894,0.00096101745,0.000021740403,0.000056200024,0.00014054851,0.000041565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023662073,0.000040098595,0.00010800568,0.000013016827,0.00052171096,0.000022256067,0.00006104427,0.00002348688,0.0000048696184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011773951,0.000026491196,0.000041879146,0.000084892046,0.0008191574,0.00003474617,0.000048378697,0.00007801976,0.000005324998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020940547,0.000009257677,0.0050006593,0.000006875936,0.00004895338,1.2575826e-7,0.009275429,6.86491e-7,0.0000013796334,0.9698753,0.015588928,0.000190361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021382178,0.000025846422,0.014309551,0.00008068416,0.000059839,4.0286298e-7,0.13968886,0.00004001778,0.0001521375,0.74180895,0.10352128,0.0000985904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006045996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011620134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046662517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050646628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9139778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410806931","doi":"10.1177/00323217251338491","title":"Personality and (Negative) Partisanship in Canadian Federal Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Personality; Political science; Social psychology; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05048873707881063,"score_gpt":0.34598958018548287,"score_spread":0.29550084310667224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410806931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4156302,0.003025156,7.2296643e-7,0.05536844,0.00026198156,0.00012088007,0.000041272975,0.000017740373,0.5255336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838158,0.0001611669,0.00001397677,0.0022083796,0.0000999825,0.000007655542,4.125291e-7,0.0000021570206,0.013690495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988297,0.000120471625,0.00010996525,0.00013618724,0.000104396095,0.0006992663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992013,0.00026225724,0.0000081997605,0.000049002847,0.000053193588,0.00042605563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027803285,0.000056049044,0.00014187298,0.00022451271,0.0010347932,0.00012066649,0.000062879524,0.000053417403,0.00011437715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014140785,0.00006981633,0.00002565915,0.00017236549,0.0016489907,0.000062008236,0.00002423394,0.000108025095,0.000018875675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.4169e-7,0.000006432481,0.071550235,0.000018619696,0.000014105005,0.000006132031,0.00593305,3.3677285e-8,1.13263944e-7,0.9166083,0.0056579676,0.00020421638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108123386,0.000006518044,0.43575865,0.000031045958,0.000010988388,2.6320427e-7,0.019039845,0.0000015105596,0.0000014159829,0.14463185,0.40030974,0.00010002143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99821466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7719764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002591247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001320508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7958897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}