{"meta":{"query_hash":"487ccd6738cc","filters":{"venue":"Political Studies"},"cohort_total":73,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"exported":73,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/487ccd6738cc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1515967280","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00930.x","title":"Does Holding Beliefs with Conviction Prevent Policy Actors from Adopting a Compromising Attitude?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Flexibility (engineering); Conviction; Politics; Democracy; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Belief system; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.10094971217238986,"score_gpt":0.4186342575045379,"score_spread":0.31768454533214807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515967280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92302346,0.00017975524,0.0041238586,0.008280278,0.000047359714,0.000030433173,0.0000329677,0.000020224836,0.06426172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893767,0.00003974935,0.00021709003,0.00023348181,0.00000795373,0.000005825325,0.000008369315,0.0000025928064,0.0005473509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943474,0.0028634318,0.00021570578,0.00042948304,0.00086049107,0.0012834877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97707134,0.008481133,0.0086516505,0.0021629496,0.0014217651,0.0022111333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063036205,0.00015613234,0.00027165402,0.00071746,0.0016572396,0.0034605183,0.0005727245,0.0016227468,0.0062122126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02896287,0.00025329567,0.00030483032,0.0006879344,0.0047142706,0.0023953686,0.001992926,0.0020596352,0.00065715273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048906065,0.0011614485,0.54199356,0.00039805038,0.00023922631,0.0012849151,0.09463835,0.0013198807,0.0064010546,0.21806583,0.0027828747,0.13122575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016666482,0.000902963,0.68870723,0.0004676888,0.00016476947,0.0009523597,0.09709873,0.0034815078,0.0039942493,0.15563065,0.04831693,0.00011623102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025999486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030562908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063036205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014046329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019933395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033337116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585834220","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00969.x","title":"Social Capital and Ethno-racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in an Immigrant Society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Socialization; Social capital; Diversity (politics); Multiculturalism; Normalization (sociology); Immigration; Ethnic group; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Racial diversity; Contact hypothesis; Social psychology; Politics; Political socialization; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Social science; American political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08767882723229209,"score_gpt":0.38629586093622376,"score_spread":0.29861703370393167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585834220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99294126,0.00008047548,0.00010837488,0.0007071558,0.000005498211,0.000004671009,0.0000081615235,0.0000011242067,0.006143246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997043,0.000036043886,0.000023659068,0.000027988386,0.000001987328,0.000001135868,0.000002805186,2.3562177e-7,0.00020177907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.00039822652,0.000021382217,0.000071729024,0.00015940801,0.0004244787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961448,0.0010386292,0.0008669412,0.00014513155,0.00033326674,0.0014712013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013369318,0.00016613174,0.00017000025,0.0007116802,0.003743174,0.00311222,0.00039165214,0.0005722945,0.0022726818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054881135,0.000101333426,0.00015235099,0.0005322263,0.0033673455,0.0014523151,0.0029139302,0.0008965612,0.00007585563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014854483,0.00044576905,0.75189185,0.000048836086,0.0000628976,0.0007941404,0.19173989,0.00042217845,0.0007696276,0.016977005,0.0011025226,0.035596844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001919575,0.00019459633,0.7119353,0.00012660016,0.000055113964,0.00034671428,0.26873127,0.0013456143,0.00035795398,0.008268688,0.008565874,0.000053207696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15470955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2522483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15470955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004161072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031786738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30761808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594187640","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x","title":"Women's Parliamentary Representation in Africa: The Impact of Democracy and Corruption on the Number of Female Deputies in National Parliaments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Democracy; Language change; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Affect (linguistics); Lower house; Political system; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.21762590270375196,"score_gpt":0.42316828671543144,"score_spread":0.20554238401167949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594187640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943541,0.00029753605,0.000056165194,0.000307542,0.000011524552,0.000004442882,0.000049897266,0.0000013542001,0.0049174963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907625,0.000109227454,0.000026186777,0.00001808792,0.000009875,0.0000027723067,0.000019430467,0.0000010626582,0.0007370854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781895,0.001218431,0.00007644547,0.00011011402,0.0002762912,0.000499695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943557,0.0022397956,0.0021591608,0.0001376301,0.00039698198,0.0007108612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018090284,0.00012031784,0.000209277,0.00089760654,0.0008223154,0.0012400203,0.0003053248,0.000343958,0.004743455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010927892,0.00012358604,0.00016404586,0.001157793,0.0008641672,0.0008404184,0.0010164222,0.00043317786,0.00041887013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064692803,0.00023605324,0.9288207,0.00009740028,0.00006418663,0.0005607584,0.018786792,0.00025585975,0.001144776,0.002983503,0.0012561615,0.045146924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009969575,0.00018664783,0.97830576,0.000059079746,0.00001828187,0.00047601567,0.015800122,0.0002963389,0.00037307123,0.000441301,0.004025388,0.000008138342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029437882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004743455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078562513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050804514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015868425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597855413","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00975.x","title":"Group Rights and Shared Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University College Dublin","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Fundamental rights; Law; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.1856507005785668,"score_gpt":0.43245100305721584,"score_spread":0.24680030247864904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597855413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03819307,0.004629961,0.053523865,0.04224744,0.00045024796,0.00009949991,0.00007061989,0.000050421844,0.8607348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549776,0.0013679817,0.0075643375,0.0039822785,0.00045346285,0.00020146139,0.00005828525,0.00003767707,0.031356867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867121,0.0075757396,0.00032821525,0.0017702465,0.0021457502,0.0014679681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937641,0.0029310922,0.0006714851,0.0013493558,0.0006681312,0.0006158713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011757386,0.0005238221,0.0006594506,0.0015446366,0.006383697,0.0075446344,0.001299425,0.0051527624,0.008297168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009245876,0.00028395726,0.0006175598,0.0011065307,0.052241467,0.009395696,0.0099679865,0.0050207875,0.00091350364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012074187,0.0000025599254,0.000039028044,0.000004907616,0.0000017394539,0.000008490144,0.0006141305,0.000040003782,0.000015394824,0.99806005,0.0002519632,0.0009604886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007657983,0.000008221774,0.00009349391,0.000025761778,0.0000024703074,0.000026998294,0.00041812824,0.00008140169,0.00004382828,0.9778756,0.02141312,0.0000032509477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021017601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016326654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011757386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003913171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062179744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1614415425","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12091","title":"The Longest Negotiation: British Policy, IRA Strategy and the Making of the Northern Ireland Peace Settlement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Negotiation; Settlement (finance); Political science; Northern ireland; State (computer science); Key (lock); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.026527419008236717,"score_gpt":0.3222031526825367,"score_spread":0.29567573367429995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1614415425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23213243,0.0070048766,0.001425693,0.034124576,0.00038707964,0.00005031774,0.00003890238,0.000037275582,0.72479886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788174,0.0013345401,0.00030890733,0.0014974761,0.00003861071,0.000037635557,0.000021801408,0.000032989385,0.017910618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892607,0.006098221,0.00023320268,0.00036418083,0.0010604885,0.0029832926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963834,0.0016614214,0.0004646649,0.00013139847,0.0005384904,0.0008205915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007894624,0.00024581671,0.0003755127,0.0019427931,0.01111905,0.013580956,0.0010880993,0.0022102525,0.0049114097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010525678,0.00036418013,0.00020411826,0.002154204,0.018785998,0.0058155744,0.004592719,0.0035275612,0.000830587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019562482,0.000117382,0.008872017,0.00029850937,0.000040246454,0.001391407,0.2903093,0.0010035137,0.0006940001,0.6193437,0.019445838,0.058288343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033436438,0.00006283105,0.022235766,0.00075803715,0.000018146548,0.00032783137,0.40633476,0.0003655567,0.0003694991,0.03808311,0.53133315,0.000077918696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25187787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35303026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25187787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03527005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022206172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50082356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1758659582","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12090","title":"The Politicization of European Integration: More than an Elite Affair?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; European union; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Assertion; European integration; Population; Phenomenon; Sociology; Law; International trade; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05713037382868516,"score_gpt":0.36291701448464986,"score_spread":0.3057866406559647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1758659582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8980271,0.0026948403,0.00067423354,0.010122454,0.0000895914,0.000008544711,0.000030757394,0.0000075002226,0.088345036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986369,0.00036310253,0.000022737775,0.0003602538,0.000054334563,0.0000017105649,0.000007864562,0.0000026887,0.0005504747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734324,0.0012095834,0.00009516786,0.00033734934,0.00042844148,0.00058621855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960522,0.0018789122,0.0011023913,0.00027333698,0.00022198902,0.00047121092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032661885,0.00010968479,0.00041382783,0.0012900339,0.002207893,0.0059212605,0.0002334408,0.0007476528,0.0032878923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007491738,0.00009890098,0.00010920304,0.002910906,0.007809975,0.003900521,0.0023914455,0.001076688,0.0001562086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026604295,0.00023204392,0.15741214,0.0002480503,0.00007652683,0.0007425724,0.2024455,0.00040474816,0.0010219899,0.51578975,0.007559117,0.113801576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037907284,0.00014876928,0.5663024,0.0005255836,0.000054228054,0.00053424283,0.2339698,0.000652148,0.0007371623,0.10006613,0.09692789,0.000043764914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003488629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004066438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059212605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018975945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012267313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017273426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778294656","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01004.x","title":"The Politics of Unconditional Basic Income: Bringing Bureaucracy Back In","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Basic income; Politics; Point (geometry); Payment; Cybernetics; Work (physics); Economics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Market economy; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.07742717719085071,"score_gpt":0.39043168602893963,"score_spread":0.31300450883808895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778294656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14643241,0.003490459,0.096660584,0.18440902,0.0009343509,0.000071471404,0.00006988584,0.00013213954,0.5677997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835917,0.00067104836,0.0033379374,0.004099801,0.00042201133,0.00007460183,0.000010233358,0.000050740386,0.0077420524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765916,0.0073155737,0.00024860358,0.0007895656,0.0017208651,0.0022663032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98807985,0.007017301,0.0012487448,0.00167911,0.0009870555,0.0009878512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011330786,0.0002760663,0.0004974958,0.0016623209,0.009061881,0.011113463,0.0011763055,0.0027966776,0.004347539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016274132,0.0003820595,0.00048747618,0.0017668114,0.04275388,0.009606385,0.009205294,0.0071308212,0.0005922091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046620835,0.000004833369,0.00021199891,0.0000053625363,0.0000011368257,0.000009543832,0.0009983553,0.00011654821,0.000031511096,0.9959728,0.0007690876,0.0018741651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015345213,0.000028103463,0.0013235816,0.00010372398,0.000008615778,0.00003841383,0.0027631624,0.000986133,0.00028854207,0.93892086,0.055508718,0.0000148284635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041448222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045965267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011330786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007912212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005730961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1804212557","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00926.x","title":"The 2011 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework: Global Health Secured or a Missed Opportunity?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Preparedness; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public relations; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Pandemic; Equity (law); Global health; Indonesian; Business; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Virus","score_opus":0.3230131558259299,"score_gpt":0.4842412953559471,"score_spread":0.16122813953001724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804212557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054512834,0.018024582,0.009789854,0.7970524,0.0071484856,0.00012923623,0.00014920207,0.00011791312,0.16213699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60809416,0.016912539,0.0206548,0.30990195,0.0070174267,0.0007133643,0.0005269302,0.00024400665,0.035934832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825915,0.008697469,0.00043851032,0.0012695616,0.0033260058,0.003676823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952945,0.0017238178,0.00036113462,0.00044691926,0.0008368867,0.001336643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030711778,0.0018217389,0.0009551557,0.0018524764,0.0081358375,0.019280016,0.0037277425,0.016218774,0.007597495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015690418,0.00053242996,0.0013560796,0.0016764315,0.028299239,0.023116508,0.015447444,0.023193493,0.00083464594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006995752,0.000014322435,0.000051640414,0.00005834941,0.0000032612231,0.000043869764,0.00092061626,0.00037502512,0.000052189327,0.9784717,0.013866169,0.0061358204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023079054,0.00007069353,0.00047775533,0.0005701302,0.0000075154794,0.00007142556,0.00494082,0.00051870046,0.000090265305,0.7610155,0.23216034,0.000053779313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016130684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016383503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030711778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019883659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0389575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1624214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836838334","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00842.x","title":"Public Spending, Public Deficits and Government Coalitions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Status quo; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Status quo bias; Government (linguistics); Economics; Government spending; Public economics; Coalition government; Power (physics); Public spending; Political science; Politics; Market economy; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.1626504726451763,"score_gpt":0.27658169147865486,"score_spread":0.11393121883347856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836838334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529358,0.0006934668,0.0009174931,0.0015410184,0.000018108381,0.000012851596,0.00051880965,0.000023533268,0.043338943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791926,0.00015467692,0.00009460054,0.000032860553,0.000017085706,0.00000783087,0.0002697909,0.000007663576,0.0014961921],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981797,0.00041425505,0.000106901985,0.00017445289,0.00034016857,0.00078458403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98445094,0.0052210917,0.006867477,0.0009364692,0.0009005687,0.0016234448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019931744,0.00024870603,0.0005200164,0.0023866494,0.0010586269,0.0028984274,0.00048000593,0.0004627736,0.008816716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016288681,0.00015237683,0.00038823573,0.0037709197,0.0016677752,0.0025233834,0.003180442,0.0013512745,0.00052288926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007910154,0.00029100355,0.7869453,0.00014374556,0.00040657935,0.00028032338,0.0032978938,0.012561401,0.00064422906,0.15236564,0.0033836088,0.038889304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009935468,0.00018561065,0.8818723,0.00013674551,0.00014185368,0.00031213838,0.0074987733,0.0053860564,0.0006128205,0.07949791,0.024216259,0.000040208935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006524406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106561845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008816716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028701525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014305442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029494882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837825643","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12059","title":"Canada's Republican Invention? On the Political Theory and Practice of Citizens' Assemblies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Institution; Ideal (ethics); Law; Order (exchange); Democratic theory; Citizenship; Sociology; Law and economics; Representation (politics); Character (mathematics); Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.037430435923000015,"score_gpt":0.31810666974042207,"score_spread":0.28067623381742207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837825643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14147435,0.0052716387,0.0025094214,0.11539695,0.00031772346,0.000033003293,0.00020148887,0.00006844562,0.73472697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96712923,0.0014220249,0.00056202523,0.002419351,0.00004249076,0.0000088538545,0.000029422892,0.00002183852,0.028364751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967121,0.000751615,0.000042760414,0.0003201735,0.0009964112,0.0011769335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786586,0.00071483006,0.0001631484,0.00019050731,0.0006292974,0.00043639797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031425222,0.00024249233,0.0003302777,0.0012496243,0.02294144,0.008971157,0.0012091174,0.0015946757,0.0061949333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004899839,0.00016986998,0.0002316524,0.0026556903,0.029130057,0.002933392,0.0029039972,0.0028368481,0.0003850574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671609,0.0000053526387,0.0010024443,0.0000143472635,0.000001778755,0.00004619738,0.015116204,0.00015956188,0.00003498467,0.96988004,0.0067785643,0.006951739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020825408,0.000026665635,0.013895511,0.00024628366,0.000024637,0.000103228274,0.07045159,0.0014861973,0.0003781404,0.15599531,0.7572913,0.00008039856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11925274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11925274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14959507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86524326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45623254708739935,"score_gpt":0.47709534641451484,"score_spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893974355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08324175,0.010326807,0.24552815,0.08527792,0.00072712963,0.00042767476,0.0002066249,0.0001183227,0.5741457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734281,0.0018918151,0.019816557,0.0011453568,0.00030328712,0.0003888175,0.00007472618,0.000057264617,0.002894132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646532,0.027262187,0.0009916226,0.0017835712,0.0040277736,0.0012816625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489272,0.041551657,0.0030557397,0.0019362958,0.003059634,0.0014695118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032042652,0.00087812357,0.0011499291,0.0068737604,0.0074466737,0.013019688,0.0029162045,0.0058106664,0.009248951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042241145,0.0008716887,0.0014038627,0.005919961,0.08475504,0.030003417,0.009250337,0.00979879,0.00063857035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029067664,0.0000052335317,0.00008919675,0.000023867544,0.0000019022577,0.000016648475,0.0008212336,0.000116218274,0.000012504988,0.9979109,0.00013162087,0.0008677406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007899333,0.000013308334,0.00021079608,0.000096204756,0.000005025739,0.000062813146,0.002090693,0.00081018446,0.000038926028,0.98872805,0.0079272,0.000008847036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018370854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010441387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032042652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074381144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060045486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16945976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896758939","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00781.x","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Global English: Language Politics in Globalisation Debates","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Globalization; Public sphere; Language politics; Sociology; Metaphor; State (computer science); Sociology of language; Global politics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Law; Language education; Comprehension approach; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07267821476621121,"score_gpt":0.4894183011300244,"score_spread":0.41674008636381316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896758939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11258788,0.045452993,0.0027397198,0.23019993,0.00078557385,0.000017568093,0.000035113157,0.000039426104,0.6081417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764995,0.0041837827,0.00029756522,0.007539278,0.00090540515,0.000022871374,0.000010849153,0.00004434442,0.010496509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993471,0.004637021,0.000086027765,0.0005082398,0.0005035431,0.0007942239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996619,0.002507944,0.00025944645,0.0001818683,0.00015834555,0.00027329693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060176235,0.00046584787,0.0005552248,0.0024078945,0.009348102,0.015071375,0.0011054456,0.006060867,0.005335899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004103336,0.00022952727,0.00051627867,0.0031647799,0.061647862,0.011681889,0.006885792,0.007849362,0.00040858882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000833236,0.0000082903825,0.0001739737,0.000021652708,0.0000022591232,0.00012154521,0.036148634,0.00006127306,0.00005382381,0.95975035,0.0016928638,0.0019569783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040876603,0.00003081152,0.00263813,0.00049983856,0.000009970197,0.00024399282,0.06922683,0.000333115,0.00026986352,0.69762474,0.22905351,0.000028391349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071268487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006668047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015071375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011877116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024989517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086174965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943366961","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00547.x","title":"Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Intervention (counseling); Empire; Introspection; Politics; International relations; Sociology; Law; Political science; History; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0734456788707056,"score_gpt":0.4252741545714664,"score_spread":0.3518284757007608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943366961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013370703,0.26008815,0.0039248895,0.3611763,0.00473474,0.000039007162,0.00004229849,0.000047790345,0.35657606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.634172,0.17411661,0.002371355,0.051484894,0.015939128,0.00014523928,0.00003647318,0.000137203,0.121597104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791104,0.0010357407,0.00006147903,0.00019622249,0.0005613578,0.00023415653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628484,0.0025612074,0.00027378096,0.0001380334,0.00035087482,0.00039130173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026284943,0.00048757376,0.000493661,0.0018156914,0.005981776,0.012688297,0.0008595039,0.0034503168,0.00267826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051993844,0.00048969116,0.0002573897,0.0025136312,0.0178549,0.0064332425,0.0019109345,0.005092372,0.000496977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015504118,0.000047190395,0.0004200212,0.00007297458,0.000012734817,0.0001498131,0.0058990815,0.00043905107,0.0000436556,0.88254815,0.100851595,0.009500159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013233241,0.000018597722,0.0010036863,0.00048661482,0.000014918629,0.00012096248,0.0051253582,0.0006090499,0.0001313342,0.3618447,0.63059944,0.00003212467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021099284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025822604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021099284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045446446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037489112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041952908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985837429","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00400","title":"Parliamentary Election Turnout in Europe since 1990","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Bivariate analysis; Voting; Range (aeronautics); Demographic economics; Public administration; Geography; Political economy; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11421700350258138,"score_gpt":0.3854178568132271,"score_spread":0.2712008533106457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985837429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941168,0.001197437,0.00010485623,0.0001779273,0.000030207786,0.0000034598913,0.0005973945,0.000019142362,0.0037527962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965436,0.0003456612,0.00006513719,0.0000432005,0.000027056209,0.0000029789587,0.001451839,0.000006662927,0.001513904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947566,0.000089507164,0.0000499666,0.00011130045,0.0000820916,0.00019156604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976859,0.00043236514,0.00094709976,0.000097087104,0.0004259397,0.00041170654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010211885,0.00014490368,0.00028210614,0.0017760018,0.00033350126,0.0010053086,0.00021131501,0.00034770428,0.0028006819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031954555,0.00009469322,0.00027143682,0.0013237258,0.0002849808,0.00052909885,0.00079235143,0.00047922568,0.00062064826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040193685,0.000068118585,0.9683765,0.00007324733,0.00014814948,0.00025066943,0.0012530681,0.00044262156,0.00070368056,0.00058246445,0.0017317657,0.025967618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026572816,0.000035666548,0.9966073,0.000009500404,0.000013572746,0.00011035339,0.00021695426,0.00007152713,0.00015423745,0.000023886223,0.0027510172,0.0000033556864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009081196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018981898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009081196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039573433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018449812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018056631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987184260","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00378","title":"Why is there so Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Group voting ticket; Split-ticket voting; Political science; Single non-transferable vote; Ranked voting system; General election; Contingent vote; Preference; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Spoilt vote; First-past-the-post voting; Instant-runoff voting; Primary election; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1731824556346918,"score_gpt":0.39644265496890957,"score_spread":0.22326019933421776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987184260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88104004,0.0022498635,0.002872229,0.014915636,0.0001376571,0.00015465681,0.0011176143,0.00010506592,0.09740716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960756,0.00035625344,0.0003783626,0.00044361321,0.00003324346,0.000021202168,0.00021480498,0.000018081328,0.0024589119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836623,0.0027445795,0.0004335378,0.00201836,0.0052373367,0.005903873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98278975,0.0049762335,0.002411493,0.0018054369,0.005530655,0.002486415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011152829,0.00035543623,0.001228553,0.004696479,0.016255112,0.005445196,0.002504123,0.0014808873,0.007038969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044434145,0.00058217905,0.00057677523,0.009691826,0.0094807865,0.002728708,0.0027714875,0.0017826842,0.0006918332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012160635,0.00021807122,0.54750407,0.000651997,0.0003010531,0.00070603145,0.052074045,0.002858255,0.0024786908,0.10815904,0.028721355,0.25511128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009966863,0.00015432078,0.8707576,0.00022808505,0.00012966109,0.00025371692,0.03681154,0.0028267899,0.0010416331,0.0216152,0.06592604,0.00015575928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96330816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98648655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038696844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038696844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040492386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28076655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993021756","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00659.x","title":"Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":334,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Outcome (game theory); Control (management); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Law; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.07739236580483107,"score_gpt":0.41510132374803044,"score_spread":0.3377089579431994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993021756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993028,0.00006952426,0.00011974912,0.00024568016,0.0000062072877,0.0000072629605,0.00008385226,0.0000029166395,0.006436778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993655,0.000027623651,0.000026943251,0.000019464454,0.0000035619041,0.000002016143,0.000073956675,0.0000010472868,0.00047984128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829715,0.0005104524,0.00011183242,0.000104665036,0.00041593486,0.0005599348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921693,0.00192982,0.0022970987,0.00036175776,0.00094484974,0.0022970845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001973747,0.00011249039,0.00037293925,0.0006697981,0.0012857304,0.0019234291,0.00030646156,0.00045216776,0.005982136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069275936,0.000107775224,0.00033486995,0.00090509205,0.0015207184,0.000498939,0.0008232292,0.00091386976,0.00032957282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024708724,0.00019930373,0.9751567,0.000038816983,0.00010205382,0.000088654226,0.0038953219,0.000299143,0.00027814988,0.0021275675,0.0009952034,0.016572002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008617341,0.000075223135,0.9933008,0.000009274332,0.00001480747,0.00005729331,0.004340601,0.0002816767,0.00007396685,0.00046956725,0.0013594242,0.000008733608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028813275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052874655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028813275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000988401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008020515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05729115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001322293","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00759.x","title":"Multiculturalism and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Multiculturalism; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Identity (music); Public administration; Section (typography); Business","score_opus":0.046047158019897956,"score_gpt":0.3229604105415068,"score_spread":0.27691325252160887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001322293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12927134,0.014553256,0.0017967633,0.0928325,0.0006022517,0.000037888065,0.00024085082,0.000030445599,0.7606347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806683,0.0030037577,0.0006202247,0.0024225356,0.000075700984,0.000006960238,0.000034638942,0.000012161407,0.013155676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399275,0.001053705,0.000102221165,0.0004357867,0.0022373355,0.0021781286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957736,0.001110221,0.00052570243,0.00024610115,0.0016017843,0.0007425483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038769192,0.00024538866,0.00024246876,0.0021174639,0.019302182,0.0077267303,0.0010789674,0.0014989019,0.004062323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060051554,0.00020930555,0.0002485849,0.0038643784,0.0280818,0.002442204,0.0031729273,0.003677698,0.00013072642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011044124,0.000006054666,0.0018522808,0.00004414651,0.0000033324027,0.000066331326,0.01758383,0.00010926815,0.000073673466,0.959843,0.009098085,0.011308958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028511113,0.00002840391,0.056495603,0.0009195148,0.00003250356,0.00020768474,0.06309502,0.0005776103,0.0006432595,0.13251022,0.74532795,0.00013358003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083007105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09924758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60226154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004500282","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00566.x","title":"The Social Policies Presidents Make: Pre-Emptive Leadership under Nixon and Clinton","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Presidential system; Politics; Typology; Ideology; Craft; Legislature; Sociology; Public administration; Political science; Power (physics); Political economy; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.16788923207555484,"score_gpt":0.398857399474346,"score_spread":0.23096816739879117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004500282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6616677,0.0026896533,0.0011391724,0.03862889,0.0004501846,0.000036026977,0.000016999204,0.000016943559,0.29535446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909719,0.00030097165,0.00012309998,0.00081795023,0.00004807663,0.00001370453,0.000003609807,0.0000054399225,0.007715205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926392,0.0045568645,0.000108522974,0.00038791404,0.00081350445,0.0014940016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957212,0.0015501633,0.0008592264,0.00022597921,0.00048367403,0.001159642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056636184,0.000188188,0.00023713801,0.0008966676,0.010228533,0.0070170136,0.00042367872,0.0013044806,0.0027253635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063243145,0.00020701358,0.00012907048,0.0007384138,0.015168385,0.003796825,0.0039265756,0.0026671179,0.0002641852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011901298,0.00007225058,0.010953833,0.00008726827,0.000009436396,0.0011124286,0.35307088,0.00017237954,0.0004788339,0.5917225,0.013543527,0.028657755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000659714,0.00022540614,0.057878073,0.00038538035,0.000015263973,0.00065290736,0.30816334,0.00054819393,0.0010991072,0.05828212,0.57259375,0.00009051012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00967828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030132405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010228533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059119742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004552583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0428946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015785474","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00507.x","title":"Globalisation, Ecological Modernisation and New Labour","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological modernization; Globalization; Modernization theory; Politics; Neglect; Government (linguistics); Economic system; Environmental degradation; Economics; Principal (computer security); Public policy; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.07683598137470636,"score_gpt":0.31445464140940405,"score_spread":0.23761866003469767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015785474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15290453,0.02537359,0.005998029,0.06975773,0.00023137576,0.000027522485,0.000044122593,0.000021506894,0.7456416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98049563,0.00588288,0.0005331204,0.00148656,0.00015877128,0.00002824791,0.000016064014,0.000008551116,0.011390152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798167,0.0011318198,0.00004008381,0.00014821869,0.00025242032,0.00044567158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850047,0.00091946335,0.00023382498,0.00014209806,0.00007850528,0.00012564051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015062985,0.00019909635,0.00023309607,0.0011256267,0.0025410396,0.005135975,0.0004061642,0.001421973,0.0042653615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023541825,0.000111959285,0.00021879002,0.0027619621,0.02753273,0.0048205857,0.0043858355,0.001528176,0.00018079384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004575335,0.0000036499744,0.0004641469,0.00002330982,0.0000018122802,0.00005547601,0.0045742006,0.00027473108,0.000027965489,0.9905273,0.0008346187,0.0032082612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008260319,0.00002160231,0.004866107,0.00022299045,0.0000040066534,0.00010112259,0.012862533,0.00040102447,0.00010484165,0.76884633,0.21255118,0.0000099841645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005622166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093214195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062878425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062878425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023454465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045621693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023023773","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00723.x","title":"Imperial Liberties: Democratisation and Governance in the ‘New’ Imperial Order","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Sociology; Democracy; Hegemony; Civil society; Law; Political science; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.05188614856526704,"score_gpt":0.2510561030695004,"score_spread":0.19916995450423333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023023773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15990184,0.007096621,0.021582661,0.03791576,0.00020162249,0.00006859114,0.00004683879,0.000070730806,0.7731152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832849,0.00096409884,0.0013726269,0.00055944157,0.000086223685,0.00003385603,0.000017020295,0.000030083102,0.013651778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518037,0.0024758084,0.00020611627,0.00065832026,0.00076862227,0.00071085466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714464,0.001402173,0.00039468624,0.00058221025,0.00019543426,0.00028086122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048975954,0.00023660278,0.00039844602,0.0008676378,0.004240888,0.011954872,0.000773602,0.0017180206,0.0029718804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065833037,0.0002431218,0.0002685827,0.0011004715,0.051696792,0.00810249,0.006547337,0.003466588,0.0003859664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044821327,0.000004198857,0.00013382063,0.000009608164,0.000001755277,0.000021588785,0.006377846,0.00017102835,0.000033412212,0.9909972,0.00041319098,0.0018317901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019419884,0.000011311887,0.00056785427,0.000068135596,0.000004230621,0.000034043358,0.0038146519,0.0005952986,0.00018320992,0.9285267,0.066168636,0.00000658067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062570185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072371406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011954872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009747346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005384169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07072222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025994862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00701.x","title":"Obligation by Association? A Reply to John Horton","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Moral obligation; Sociology; Association (psychology); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08018636217447421,"score_gpt":0.42054983002937246,"score_spread":0.34036346785489824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025994862","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024732898,0.0019745857,0.00011828444,0.9926224,0.0034559953,0.000001546103,0.0000047684225,0.0000045898423,0.0015705669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012196959,0.003256611,0.0002836486,0.96800274,0.010954344,0.00002047389,0.000008431332,0.000033603363,0.0052432627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302953,0.0033293117,0.0002852405,0.0011821279,0.0016872075,0.00048650836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777314,0.025270322,0.000756772,0.0008504885,0.0031815823,0.0021676081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012458503,0.00062518276,0.0014986435,0.00091123563,0.007458973,0.0070982333,0.0036264826,0.030036757,0.007925053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040278926,0.0007140488,0.0007281337,0.0014316448,0.022566171,0.020345207,0.006155827,0.0452763,0.0026626987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275359,0.000019672096,0.00020244061,0.00008388949,0.000010173507,0.00020841332,0.0024276986,0.00006173295,0.00007049768,0.08989718,0.8995458,0.007439723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060577288,0.000027136879,0.00073587964,0.0004788017,0.000012751179,0.00054354937,0.007370979,0.00034194047,0.00023755629,0.14670312,0.8433955,0.00009230636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00865922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008573849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030036757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038257518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050009578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06588763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047852660","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00504.x","title":"The Ambiguities of Reconciliation and Responsibility in South Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; McGill University","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Commission; Denial; Narrative; Moral responsibility; Reading (process); Balance (ability); Sociology; Law; Responsibility to protect; Political science; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08089644965285242,"score_gpt":0.3697666242673601,"score_spread":0.2888701746145077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047852660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67622805,0.011513715,0.009396055,0.06333216,0.0003205011,0.000056626377,0.000011806492,0.000035968416,0.2391051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965616,0.00074836216,0.0002459558,0.00046260597,0.00001791799,0.000009471879,0.0000010909228,0.000008860553,0.001944017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99040085,0.0077211047,0.00015523391,0.0003002084,0.00062901695,0.00079351186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941736,0.0043463795,0.000747944,0.00028555392,0.00020030481,0.00024621145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009386363,0.00039885892,0.00038062382,0.0012742582,0.012706845,0.0070721214,0.0008147687,0.0024622022,0.0021912209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146769,0.00032039083,0.00019822162,0.0010569944,0.07132764,0.00798552,0.009305994,0.0039334097,0.0001438054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020434107,0.000009099164,0.00044595345,0.000057331887,0.000003298316,0.00041136617,0.6459161,0.00006866631,0.0003823307,0.34622043,0.00047518176,0.0059897876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016521548,0.000045271783,0.0026293742,0.00042166284,0.000008795364,0.00069967244,0.6487656,0.00021255735,0.00086207245,0.2233419,0.1229666,0.000030008898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005084734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048407144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012706845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058396035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033949069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049640417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071676811","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00439","title":"Contractualism and Liberal Neutrality: A Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Neutrality; Legitimacy; Mistake; Law and economics; Impartiality; Politics; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Political science; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16282176328477097,"score_gpt":0.419368508874564,"score_spread":0.25654674558979307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071676811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045854174,0.0045495746,0.12558372,0.19128662,0.0015353049,0.00015817153,0.00007424345,0.000107496795,0.63085073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464134,0.001314371,0.0095126685,0.01651962,0.0019310608,0.0002967954,0.000033369077,0.00010412241,0.01564665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846926,0.0067823785,0.00049021025,0.0018478361,0.004728266,0.0014587506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806816,0.011406799,0.0017305467,0.0030651528,0.0018993473,0.0012164938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019149197,0.00066680653,0.0010069568,0.0016115438,0.0055605806,0.009223621,0.0025733819,0.009285815,0.005532213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024951283,0.000549187,0.0012838959,0.0015905269,0.06893466,0.01343714,0.009853577,0.015278572,0.0010665532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003977053,0.0000029702728,0.000032267275,0.000006420809,0.0000017416912,0.000008156399,0.0003667483,0.000033094497,0.000020494843,0.99863106,0.00028572272,0.0006072717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012809528,0.0000069159905,0.000052391,0.000022913002,0.0000016792816,0.000022967783,0.0001427473,0.00014533069,0.000055026485,0.99126035,0.008272462,0.000004380102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023524975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011504705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019149197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057560694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065770545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10127187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079916482","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00280","title":"Bougainville and Papua New Guinea: Complexities of Secession in a Multi-Ethnic Developing State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Morality; Ethnic group; New guinea; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Normative; Distributive justice; Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.3779954448919442,"score_gpt":0.4751971691122485,"score_spread":0.09720172422030432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079916482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253596,0.0010748017,0.0007950041,0.007919606,0.00003145928,0.00004209295,0.000008527733,0.000005487592,0.06476338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823964,0.00018755299,0.0001941117,0.00022351241,0.0000036365552,0.000019311046,0.0000018687007,0.00000135014,0.0011290051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980242,0.001158825,0.000040229246,0.00010280866,0.00009383323,0.00058011693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768066,0.0017433317,0.00020588624,0.00010528545,0.000079892874,0.00018493227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034523536,0.0002301062,0.00038062892,0.0009466621,0.011514942,0.0068034413,0.0009911021,0.002355567,0.0020876473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037396976,0.00034089526,0.00020950042,0.00095350854,0.018663807,0.003957294,0.0069736093,0.002937543,0.00007517462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012642339,0.00008959085,0.016716698,0.0001806811,0.000026057061,0.014349053,0.40973577,0.0009897231,0.0012616268,0.5314709,0.0010287008,0.024024876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004929499,0.00013440274,0.030652553,0.0005758647,0.000057779114,0.004419643,0.81459254,0.0018832411,0.00074833474,0.09644626,0.05037052,0.00006957797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039110646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08612706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039110646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006021618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043668207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098351263","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12087","title":"Political Mobilisation, Ethnic Diversity and Social Cohesion: The Conditional Effect of Political Parties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multiculturalism; Rhetoric; Salience (neuroscience); Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cohesion (chemistry); Nationalism; Ethnic group; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Immigration; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08515644827209631,"score_gpt":0.36400754277304653,"score_spread":0.27885109450095025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098351263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98816186,0.00011700415,0.00017933836,0.000307534,0.000007468655,0.0000060612006,0.000029359026,0.0000017157064,0.011189691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996854,0.000021926771,0.000023622953,0.000010949482,0.0000034835218,0.0000027027431,0.000008536114,8.918049e-7,0.00024251784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635446,0.0022349544,0.00013264436,0.00032785648,0.0004462889,0.00050384767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97543895,0.014939842,0.0056283064,0.00092846336,0.0005408896,0.0025235207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024940702,0.00020231472,0.00027817837,0.00076730514,0.0012294397,0.0022107856,0.00034002066,0.0005802377,0.008563628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013083894,0.00009839339,0.00028486075,0.00086748204,0.0027260429,0.0010603459,0.0030698252,0.0008844824,0.0003199162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092443527,0.0006296659,0.93234676,0.00014884172,0.00039091796,0.00047087783,0.022654815,0.00093602913,0.0018929627,0.018236743,0.0004516256,0.02091648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027597345,0.00030886626,0.97600013,0.00008080882,0.00013698147,0.0001210014,0.01422548,0.0008871838,0.00044098857,0.005440211,0.0023157836,0.000014960609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032589408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003864037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008563628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084407756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006244313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028648198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2148880415269112,"score_gpt":0.4882066868125774,"score_spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112170319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012459942,0.015030068,0.1433589,0.48697105,0.009776825,0.00008568772,0.0002395464,0.0002777066,0.3318003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.777816,0.008836263,0.045361273,0.1276806,0.013026399,0.00033511847,0.0002393115,0.00042965845,0.026275419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648536,0.005517684,0.00064341945,0.0018223656,0.004637918,0.0008932849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796937,0.013469387,0.0009165749,0.0025848227,0.002611227,0.00072417234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014483603,0.00070426334,0.0012101515,0.0032074526,0.006279312,0.006613983,0.003261372,0.0087164175,0.00653189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028887743,0.00041361683,0.0018432084,0.0016954239,0.049164705,0.013689671,0.008411995,0.015665883,0.0020866562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031419124,0.00000578895,0.000028335762,0.000018762637,0.0000028061932,0.000012875613,0.00015741483,0.00007148798,0.0000082652705,0.9952005,0.0028554234,0.0016351298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045561596,0.000004027528,0.000021446185,0.00003432294,0.0000018400195,0.000020989119,0.00006714289,0.00019196598,0.000023134646,0.9856895,0.0139374165,0.0000037225395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036364584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019448708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014483603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056448067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051450655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07659751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112547010","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00611.x","title":"Testing the Decline of Parliament Thesis: Ireland, 1923–2002","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Irish; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07350500153003924,"score_gpt":0.34238886298699217,"score_spread":0.2688838614569529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112547010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90165114,0.0009671508,0.00024707604,0.00893165,0.00018865714,0.00007300761,0.0014064683,0.000018790719,0.08651597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779482,0.00036169845,0.00008514876,0.0012769542,0.000076604534,0.00006705831,0.00059179426,0.000025151303,0.019567361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949567,0.001102555,0.00032334408,0.00048040898,0.0013711235,0.0017659866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381144,0.0027432134,0.0042908927,0.0009980749,0.0062513324,0.0019050593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009882403,0.00017455283,0.0005051589,0.0023831043,0.003425726,0.0032179523,0.0014109644,0.0011537442,0.005034069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024756312,0.0004478816,0.00029110158,0.003882811,0.0056890515,0.0025816555,0.002904032,0.0030888577,0.0014082977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013722813,0.00043056114,0.37407696,0.0005213756,0.000098570374,0.0013974161,0.401585,0.00047676044,0.001152195,0.033455886,0.056599785,0.12883317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034596724,0.00020446836,0.74495906,0.00014969915,0.000016446244,0.00021442575,0.12065354,0.00016280837,0.00068007794,0.0007644852,0.13211043,0.00004988337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47134885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5585151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47134885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026252529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011077696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93721056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126871687","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12008","title":"Polls and the Vote in Britain","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Outcome (game theory); General election; Presidential election; Spoilt vote; Politics; Period (music); Opinion poll; Primary election; Presidential system; Group voting ticket; Public administration; Law; Economics; Public opinion","score_opus":0.07004385815879804,"score_gpt":0.39680287298870603,"score_spread":0.326759014829908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126871687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394141,0.0021157558,0.00069854636,0.0024930467,0.00013668078,0.000027483271,0.0008019811,0.00003645236,0.054275926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346185,0.00030031058,0.00014854448,0.00014104781,0.000059313537,0.000014776039,0.000447049,0.000020179894,0.0054068826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995363,0.002624477,0.00024475803,0.00031363597,0.00079582294,0.00065819244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956364,0.0053330786,0.0023384632,0.00062423304,0.0013643173,0.0007763681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042201523,0.00012414259,0.0005055529,0.0025191815,0.0011538425,0.002356745,0.00032708657,0.00061946095,0.007761689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021873942,0.00030692617,0.00027743995,0.004814845,0.0013152162,0.0007691119,0.0016277729,0.00077432476,0.0012487129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013468044,0.00024390421,0.8122357,0.00038342254,0.00024765515,0.00035187177,0.017144786,0.001080779,0.0016622889,0.03368599,0.013412245,0.1182045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002088456,0.0000853744,0.98078203,0.000058916736,0.00002004174,0.00004188801,0.0022973816,0.0003619623,0.00015608635,0.0017313042,0.0144277625,0.000016524356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025691833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040942136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025691833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013184638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005938692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051084578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128284528","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00346","title":"Sowing Dragon's Teeth: Public Support for Political Violence and Paramilitarism in Northern Ireland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear decommissioning; Politics; Political violence; Population; Criminology; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.055020239589923754,"score_gpt":0.35961784703244537,"score_spread":0.3045976074425216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128284528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918257,0.00018652446,0.000009390652,0.0023636562,0.000012605076,0.000004098104,0.00003151791,0.0000012068529,0.0055652526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00014715955,0.000008213742,0.00019157218,0.000008261034,0.0000061192113,0.00001663244,8.2315387e-7,0.0005280735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998243,0.00078286236,0.000050719394,0.00006381738,0.0002191127,0.0006405876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961414,0.00092349056,0.001196975,0.00016292612,0.0004042479,0.0011709908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001899116,0.00011104448,0.00029889992,0.0010607293,0.0018567259,0.0018780589,0.0005189387,0.0006184198,0.0033654082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007370126,0.00021744799,0.00016298254,0.0010617959,0.0017964903,0.00092604116,0.0016413814,0.00140299,0.0002924931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015232679,0.00025694372,0.87155503,0.00010611551,0.00004355869,0.0006845915,0.093105026,0.000105292325,0.00025391753,0.0023891765,0.0076098987,0.023738196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013522506,0.00007269514,0.87773776,0.000091128844,0.00000985747,0.0001407627,0.11683157,0.000073049225,0.000053894153,0.00020965002,0.0047520488,0.000014074436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22156148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37975118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22156148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004742377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003964448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4405437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129462394","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00350","title":"Steger on Engels — A Brief Comment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Socialism; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18981073142651247,"score_gpt":0.45329904304675417,"score_spread":0.26348831162024167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129462394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019099173,0.0036336835,0.0001557193,0.9772792,0.0066218367,0.000006948624,0.00005338419,0.000024394769,0.010314921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033355426,0.003946881,0.00019697126,0.9352224,0.008952522,0.000045120094,0.00003219444,0.00009153001,0.018157003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449027,0.001541039,0.0003043441,0.0014074796,0.0014605711,0.000796315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819957,0.014445677,0.0008066132,0.0005426739,0.0017163773,0.0004930243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064270217,0.0009375652,0.0010890793,0.001323988,0.005890019,0.0073084147,0.0030352224,0.023983367,0.009139721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036652084,0.00048186234,0.0008745264,0.0023062562,0.0097753005,0.010702751,0.00509164,0.0222987,0.003288439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045617107,0.000014320152,0.00035549112,0.000098274504,0.000011316209,0.00045856767,0.004236133,0.0001015155,0.00018674995,0.1529779,0.83535933,0.0061547905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001981695,0.000021600561,0.0012397537,0.0006352728,0.000011520716,0.0002167027,0.006850378,0.0001526827,0.00035170178,0.04845672,0.94198686,0.00005703535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02238589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019034479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023983367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005581598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044439477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0445112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131643728","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00431","title":"Millian Radical Democracy: Education for Freedom and Dilemmas of Liberal Equality","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meritocracy; Individualism; Democracy; Mill; Sociology; Liberalism; Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08261371204018352,"score_gpt":0.4138531305585156,"score_spread":0.33123941851833205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131643728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05369283,0.008181678,0.027502285,0.42689103,0.0013993402,0.00004063095,0.000043503518,0.000046794892,0.4822019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95584494,0.0018388063,0.0032709301,0.02018285,0.0010319786,0.00007889319,0.000015221997,0.000037464917,0.017698804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924009,0.004787632,0.00012052426,0.0006119329,0.001221673,0.000857323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934409,0.0044703404,0.00050704164,0.000641483,0.00039674997,0.0005435288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009863324,0.00031493837,0.00046512374,0.0011971416,0.007677876,0.009210175,0.00081762346,0.003647886,0.003994668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012502944,0.00017793284,0.0003964342,0.0009979878,0.036649004,0.008367094,0.006458011,0.0073190634,0.0003869363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003200408,0.0000045975075,0.00005325393,0.0000045629304,9.953737e-7,0.0000074013255,0.0010501854,0.00004895508,0.000009742359,0.99556476,0.001650202,0.0016021228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071144577,0.0000060279276,0.000104070794,0.000021366437,0.0000012006643,0.000010019445,0.00067150616,0.0001464778,0.000043830885,0.9687875,0.030197607,0.0000032582145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017496888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025253154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009863324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045910385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035013766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052162886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133948504","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00665.x","title":"When US Scholars Speak of ‘Sovereignty’, what do they Mean?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; Independence (probability theory); International relations; International law; Political science; Sociology; Territorial integrity; Human rights; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192800796130983,"score_gpt":0.36339164333671586,"score_spread":0.321463635375406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133948504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04344969,0.08779406,0.037220962,0.5065241,0.010848989,0.00006855492,0.00016320338,0.00012093584,0.31380957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890966,0.032990184,0.0101094395,0.04818935,0.007954504,0.00027939223,0.0001549975,0.00017411869,0.00918195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98485017,0.0096468935,0.0007562486,0.0011958232,0.002380644,0.0011703956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746771,0.017886939,0.002375493,0.0017785345,0.0021284383,0.0011534657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01572613,0.0009339556,0.0014801945,0.0037593725,0.0069039296,0.018488599,0.0018258638,0.006538568,0.0037406853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030149063,0.00041526192,0.000550349,0.0076572206,0.07424696,0.02799468,0.007640785,0.012918539,0.0007506265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000612231,0.000008156243,0.00046023706,0.00006884992,0.0000100498655,0.000027864533,0.028012598,0.000062485684,0.000057266858,0.95876163,0.006295298,0.0062294155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009287423,0.000021740201,0.0007940698,0.0007044625,0.000015171174,0.00008490092,0.029913059,0.00019835054,0.00014756208,0.786706,0.18138334,0.000022110882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003209862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023905584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018488599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039394484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00391951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083168745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137375941","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x","title":"When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":607,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Cultural diversity; Interpersonal ties; Context (archaeology); Survey data collection; European Social Survey; Democracy; Social trust; Citizenship; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Social capital; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.0378203951933691,"score_gpt":0.31728311478897836,"score_spread":0.27946271959560925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137375941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885565,0.00063434074,0.0006618514,0.0023895963,0.000037297174,0.000006934291,0.00004920547,0.000004391252,0.0076599815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996208,0.00009818861,0.000043600696,0.000042626198,0.00001032431,0.0000014804533,0.000005421479,0.000001252991,0.0001762228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965346,0.0018349001,0.000115355746,0.00040737214,0.00036680856,0.0007409038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97960544,0.011314714,0.0041609984,0.0013696668,0.0006813193,0.0028678786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027963317,0.00025809673,0.0006427345,0.00080618274,0.001717307,0.0029032214,0.00062026066,0.00084108044,0.0040993434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019341432,0.00024916694,0.00044680276,0.00091204175,0.0028250313,0.0023214102,0.0039408277,0.0013973116,0.00015651663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003188538,0.00024910297,0.94080144,0.00009254324,0.00041887126,0.00095337874,0.014000524,0.0006903293,0.0005565909,0.014690715,0.0005763178,0.026651321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029257206,0.00032220533,0.94778275,0.00020407056,0.00035448722,0.0005477511,0.021889783,0.0017136734,0.00040833832,0.022848412,0.0038566517,0.000042659816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009860624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013042501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009860624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010993655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012134098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019606471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146408989","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00780.x","title":"Latin American Canadians Rethink Their Political Spaces: Grass-Roots or Electoral Participation?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Grassroots; Distrust; Latin Americans; Political science; Disappointment; Focus group; Political economy; Sociology; Political efficacy; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06746378523996524,"score_gpt":0.36434748484191487,"score_spread":0.2968836996019496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146408989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637454,0.00083695515,0.00013086462,0.004519898,0.000039243107,0.00003372408,0.0000858007,0.000006848751,0.030601194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933287,0.0006156648,0.00010440915,0.00051133434,0.000011846297,0.000011912969,0.00005545445,0.0000067477436,0.0053539826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977487,0.00044776837,0.000025954902,0.00016456572,0.00036490572,0.0012481072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984181,0.00023468562,0.00019847561,0.00006141707,0.00035961915,0.0007277429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002191563,0.00032010808,0.000475725,0.0018835972,0.024312016,0.0068803523,0.0012165097,0.0010150583,0.0055328947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032300872,0.00025080435,0.00023150425,0.0030494016,0.010818219,0.0018032711,0.0036863447,0.001497396,0.000306949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007789211,0.000040872277,0.06270949,0.00007627656,0.000012576868,0.0004565445,0.8962251,0.00004740372,0.00086585095,0.010732266,0.0037175613,0.025038099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005794529,0.000014187632,0.04678269,0.000072251176,0.0000074693858,0.000068244764,0.9203908,0.00003892796,0.00009417912,0.00034574952,0.03216085,0.000018931774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036441006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036441006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038690288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26439923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152636297","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00273","title":"Conflicting Equalities? Cultural Group Rights and Sex Equality","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Cultural rights; Subject (documents); Sociology; Inequality; Fundamental rights; Gender equality; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15524163669787802,"score_gpt":0.46572448071801165,"score_spread":0.3104828440201336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152636297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1464264,0.008841914,0.0059281527,0.08849026,0.00062594813,0.000016537193,0.000031193173,0.000015552168,0.749624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809764,0.0015050574,0.00038744672,0.0021211035,0.0002017918,0.000010224434,0.000009705618,0.00000930002,0.014778971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957475,0.0024330453,0.00005694282,0.00038273033,0.00057875266,0.0008009716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979962,0.0011470099,0.00023799835,0.00020415035,0.00015445771,0.00026032978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033895788,0.0002578493,0.00035068425,0.00088476314,0.006127585,0.007192412,0.00069739507,0.0019673419,0.010248128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005846401,0.00012949333,0.00017723894,0.0011203063,0.052995197,0.0065433336,0.0058341553,0.001979047,0.00050286134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006786351,0.0000048501256,0.00035632504,0.00001461317,0.0000023806706,0.000048821068,0.031713217,0.000029206292,0.00006366756,0.9593415,0.00094742666,0.0074712085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011254175,0.000015547344,0.0015631552,0.0001521805,0.0000064097208,0.00012435473,0.08657383,0.000118581374,0.00019488997,0.79625,0.1149809,0.000008955085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024688357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022537295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024688357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004254169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031823185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049089313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154957127","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00958.x","title":"Lockean Toleration: Dialogical not Theological?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dialogical self; Protestantism; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Nonconformity; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Law; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3301795896720684,"score_gpt":0.44989559047925026,"score_spread":0.11971600080718187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154957127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03491503,0.012875386,0.04201172,0.38750803,0.0026900326,0.000051100895,0.000069601876,0.00012290273,0.5197562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592246,0.0016287954,0.002556627,0.020820724,0.0013607446,0.00013314476,0.000031231782,0.00007001664,0.014174188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853969,0.010116005,0.00032965117,0.001201602,0.0018004652,0.0011554862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369615,0.0035675275,0.0006529175,0.0008237255,0.0006138841,0.0006458076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009174047,0.00045886432,0.000673366,0.001501968,0.009197661,0.015469172,0.0020164012,0.006575986,0.0075804545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017736198,0.00030700344,0.0004937429,0.0016083523,0.073987246,0.022682985,0.011192803,0.009567068,0.0007743384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000657617,0.0000070451015,0.00006493772,0.000018511362,0.0000018362445,0.000024137013,0.00785494,0.000016149084,0.00003600169,0.9889742,0.0012258366,0.0017697625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026664431,0.000026853015,0.00030447918,0.00023547183,0.000006702264,0.00017652196,0.020186327,0.00020107138,0.00019502525,0.8482511,0.13036749,0.000022208835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022867129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019069503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015469172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063124825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040004775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048517585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165987554","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00714.x","title":"Civic Engagement and Civic Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: Introduction to the Symposium","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civic engagement; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0868098275855662,"score_gpt":0.4148040372920291,"score_spread":0.32799420970646287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165987554","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014325284,0.321644,0.008461908,0.30635938,0.051330235,0.00013817866,0.00030202558,0.00006281156,0.29737613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29433322,0.34969983,0.0071622673,0.069486134,0.08848912,0.00067627925,0.0005433507,0.00019249287,0.18941724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965394,0.00014942317,0.000013893285,0.00007312228,0.00004436609,0.00006524926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992471,0.000367578,0.00002844143,0.000026417578,0.00014368434,0.00018677239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010968993,0.0006133862,0.00074273784,0.0012027536,0.003991266,0.0062953224,0.00079606933,0.004562799,0.015142564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011497653,0.00031730483,0.0006840996,0.0018332928,0.0028440238,0.0063796495,0.0037573853,0.007076737,0.0028010989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004352369,0.00035008826,0.0022721868,0.00075303856,0.000021846903,0.00050629274,0.013532138,0.00040761105,0.00055761135,0.5747923,0.3180893,0.088674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006707061,0.0000436998,0.003343829,0.0013449022,0.000011293082,0.0002610088,0.008377218,0.00028764302,0.00007030948,0.06619931,0.92002726,0.000026813153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041408385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007096331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015142564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031443257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018752668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050656915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168314353","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00481.x","title":"Do (Some) Canadian Voters Punish a Prime Minister for Calling a Snap Election?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Prime minister; Opposition (politics); Politics; General election; Political science; Law; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.10963823443334096,"score_gpt":0.4203678878012823,"score_spread":0.31072965336794134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168314353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9308657,0.0003213289,0.00022784802,0.013109663,0.00006733916,0.000072168354,0.00022048436,0.000014205548,0.055101335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471503,0.00014455125,0.00009031132,0.0010819519,0.000020534188,0.000010535275,0.000047126927,0.0000027877652,0.0038871416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761534,0.00040145617,0.000039523118,0.0001376936,0.00069654296,0.0011095633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559903,0.0007134756,0.001480194,0.00015466101,0.0012811245,0.0007714886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002233492,0.00022407855,0.00023723075,0.00061020773,0.0066620996,0.002174609,0.0006840328,0.0012959117,0.0055643045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013877533,0.00019577751,0.00028138436,0.0010242425,0.0021798145,0.0005271813,0.00067814067,0.0014424119,0.0005725837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010171125,0.00020483564,0.77244,0.0002556105,0.00017969804,0.0007098681,0.050198164,0.0009529522,0.0026430003,0.018272046,0.03758935,0.11553741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059287184,0.00014819104,0.8739147,0.00007906802,0.000078288125,0.00013828938,0.06608024,0.0007464373,0.0005306804,0.001351001,0.0567757,0.000097944845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016727244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012189808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18639064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169831876","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00779.x","title":"Concurrent Elections and Voter Turnout: The Effect of the De-Linking of State Elections on Electoral Participation in India's Parliamentary Polls, 1971-2004","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Ceteris paribus; Incentive; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Political economy; State (computer science); Decentralization; Voter turnout; General election; Politics; Government (linguistics); Economics; Demographic economics; Voting; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04050522181947482,"score_gpt":0.4019845213925761,"score_spread":0.3614792995731013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169831876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971955,0.0002603043,0.00009072996,0.00019036316,0.00001992782,0.000006178404,0.00015451846,0.000004232875,0.0020781788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.00010198578,0.00002865038,0.000028638415,0.00003217353,0.0000050416347,0.00024287392,0.0000024193766,0.0006938952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857426,0.00045822878,0.0000969135,0.00022776812,0.00024342939,0.0003994521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983576,0.0071767326,0.005580566,0.0008985296,0.00091636076,0.0018518245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021057995,0.00025879848,0.00040987445,0.0010471975,0.0010577937,0.0022269546,0.0006794665,0.0005142738,0.0043128505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013003846,0.000251412,0.0006495642,0.0014007237,0.0011619587,0.00070524594,0.002119253,0.0014743571,0.00050966465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008299474,0.0002472788,0.98793924,0.00003477806,0.00022189108,0.00007594698,0.0009156216,0.0004690529,0.00070902053,0.00068386126,0.00028625538,0.0075870533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011466151,0.00014950722,0.9982742,0.0000057719685,0.000067756024,0.000028030267,0.00037912745,0.00011810764,0.00024882003,0.00008585101,0.00062636356,0.0000049905657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02462018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049398113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02462018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012730828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091836374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048953712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549702762","doi":"10.1177/0032321716666293","title":"Centripetalism, Consociationalism and Cyprus: The “Adoptability” Question","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Prosperity; Power (physics); Power sharing; Institution; Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.06231808926361124,"score_gpt":0.3882607646680093,"score_spread":0.32594267540439803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549702762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832225,0.0042316075,0.003789504,0.007309938,0.00004970366,0.000021614977,0.00003704549,0.000013432915,0.20132467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858487,0.00034198054,0.00011408089,0.0001224875,0.000022564021,0.0000046017453,0.0000053528815,0.0000019580875,0.0008020602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974064,0.0013400414,0.00010725741,0.00033601632,0.0003504838,0.00045974812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593997,0.00206334,0.0011813691,0.0004703986,0.00019773353,0.00014730635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036117262,0.0001826912,0.000283572,0.0010915607,0.0031028814,0.004410105,0.00055817264,0.0012126213,0.002898944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003731683,0.00014214774,0.00019966344,0.0021892907,0.014053416,0.0042304946,0.002490939,0.0014756226,0.00017627457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008264048,0.00002127654,0.016495453,0.00010264197,0.000029470753,0.0005521184,0.022932375,0.00045775058,0.0005248219,0.9320319,0.00078833505,0.025981296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006124647,0.00036089294,0.3754022,0.0009146112,0.00012868144,0.0025528509,0.073144466,0.0026673384,0.0028387145,0.4173144,0.12449572,0.0001188666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045946506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003945982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045946506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041572405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017943128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03016305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758769579","doi":"10.1177/0032321717723507","title":"Mini-publics and Public Opinion: Two Survey-Based Experiments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; MacEwan University","keywords":"Publics; Legitimacy; Public opinion; Politics; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Survey research; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.35120198904806715,"score_gpt":0.5065673476760167,"score_spread":0.1553653586279496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758769579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939913,0.00003581686,0.001251097,0.00013867379,0.00005285495,0.0021741148,0.00030286712,0.00002213562,0.0020312285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659442,0.000111730275,0.008596485,0.0006902372,0.00012461655,0.020533212,0.0007366712,0.00002501203,0.003237941],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.97352976,0.019830696,0.0015091131,0.0017788737,0.002134895,0.0012165981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7901183,0.18281588,0.012474416,0.008905379,0.0032577503,0.0024282904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024613991,0.0012192833,0.0015218208,0.0010438076,0.0017930877,0.0024970924,0.0017656016,0.0033106648,0.006765834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055105884,0.0012690393,0.0012579483,0.0010855452,0.0027718775,0.0028894187,0.0023455357,0.00386412,0.001006716],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15670587,0.464346,0.13949777,0.0035464934,0.0015077866,0.0006958632,0.05607575,0.007635692,0.04768929,0.009351637,0.005867308,0.10708066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.054571673,0.44964772,0.34368774,0.00056909263,0.0018608533,0.00063181005,0.02880498,0.033334922,0.04933984,0.015927907,0.02063978,0.0009836229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016063544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015354954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024613991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013570782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13017279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760260117","doi":"10.1177/0032321717722360","title":"Impartiality and the Definition of Corruption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Language change; Politics; Political corruption; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22640879450053558,"score_gpt":0.4267496499605336,"score_spread":0.20034085545999802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760260117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049430273,0.041691404,0.09341835,0.077695094,0.0010651427,0.00010852773,0.00020130396,0.000077553064,0.7363124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757534,0.0059190076,0.006326096,0.0026698697,0.0009694557,0.00016353387,0.00006985688,0.000040336356,0.008088415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803477,0.012904676,0.00082305475,0.0009869708,0.0031649189,0.0017726738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689157,0.00788506,0.0019842698,0.0012610699,0.0013215723,0.0006565815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008179058,0.0006148979,0.00088512775,0.00481719,0.0041682823,0.009719636,0.0015722197,0.0033683826,0.0024835947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014123124,0.00033349142,0.00069642975,0.004420193,0.04693636,0.008824617,0.0065701073,0.00721494,0.0004914349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014137228,0.000002093246,0.00006330379,0.000007676964,0.000001259465,0.000008678987,0.00028021977,0.000102378064,0.000007646815,0.9984297,0.0003174773,0.0007781326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003915058,0.000006591723,0.00026265313,0.00008772501,0.0000030349106,0.00004477629,0.0003000357,0.00039261143,0.000042836033,0.9813332,0.017513566,0.000009029257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017370436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011200021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009719636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051966202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028005114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043255508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402058","doi":"10.1177/0032321717726919","title":"Communicating Cosmopolitanism and Motivating Global Citizenship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Culpability; Sociology; Action (physics); Global citizenship; Action research; Argument (complex analysis); Collective action; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.22473767706701364,"score_gpt":0.5040316341716451,"score_spread":0.27929395710463145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63780975,0.0006892352,0.016399477,0.013477876,0.0002185891,0.000072698436,0.000014382483,0.00009005595,0.3312279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539316,0.00014012426,0.0014250856,0.0003894923,0.000038912658,0.000020075979,0.0000054994907,0.000016759142,0.002570854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960756,0.002956463,0.00006673394,0.00018328178,0.000386486,0.0003314209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936992,0.0031885293,0.001399407,0.00042360113,0.0004074018,0.00088187645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004312683,0.0004610854,0.00018888262,0.0009809074,0.002803968,0.0047123157,0.000459256,0.001763478,0.004055534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008263395,0.00015985202,0.00025008802,0.0005480168,0.008142566,0.0032284264,0.004769836,0.0017676087,0.0004846356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109993925,0.00042208793,0.0426465,0.000396204,0.00008650871,0.00096467277,0.27670273,0.0011365375,0.0046854764,0.54600555,0.0055976445,0.121246025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066262284,0.0006263571,0.05847957,0.00086029986,0.00010987129,0.0013536772,0.29786363,0.0039057373,0.0053796726,0.36813125,0.26305565,0.00016806899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004034148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008207142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047123157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093347573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010148591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022807896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793506630","doi":"10.1177/0032321718761466","title":"Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Public relations; Corporate governance; Faith; Public engagement; Political efficacy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Public trust; Democracy; Public opinion; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06544212779348799,"score_gpt":0.41805282306326375,"score_spread":0.35261069526977573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793506630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149656,0.013019818,0.010698867,0.011411051,0.00026923686,0.00038898917,0.00027833652,0.000044913355,0.048923213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974113,0.001097292,0.00083907216,0.00024815134,0.00002671068,0.00009380592,0.000032939843,0.000006018802,0.00024466362],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9379718,0.052255113,0.003161818,0.0016454983,0.0032276895,0.0017381354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74697,0.20247911,0.03255967,0.00903121,0.005402333,0.0035577042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0399535,0.00034771868,0.0008166334,0.0023172186,0.0023704288,0.0071693333,0.00078305847,0.0014791321,0.0032757104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12296948,0.00044413054,0.00095710193,0.00276318,0.010069271,0.0065119094,0.0063794944,0.0021151376,0.00023271656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011676034,0.0013318328,0.2653162,0.010674984,0.0019284805,0.00078930915,0.25788757,0.0019451024,0.0010177018,0.09368641,0.00279974,0.36145502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002929552,0.001784106,0.49894977,0.017440412,0.0015909596,0.000654837,0.26275352,0.0023350145,0.0040142005,0.13484265,0.07496191,0.0003797096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017267566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002905149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0399535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025742033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040763454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21129686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793592185","doi":"10.1177/0032321718762882","title":"Time and the Fulfillment of Election Pledges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Mandate; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Business; Economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.06726927031446683,"score_gpt":0.40259254083817125,"score_spread":0.3353232705237044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793592185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96731013,0.00078393327,0.0033166313,0.0011316157,0.00006796185,0.00013528312,0.002181498,0.00007126077,0.025001802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904784,0.00022473725,0.0015071988,0.000054251475,0.000051448194,0.000084186664,0.002006474,0.000029690522,0.0055637117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902159,0.004036937,0.0013250279,0.0008505781,0.0024664705,0.0011050485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953719,0.04961193,0.03500406,0.006933197,0.008499455,0.0045794444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013312886,0.00021894339,0.00048021984,0.004949237,0.00261371,0.003222746,0.000955178,0.00076381076,0.010642917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09499231,0.00026505865,0.0004667119,0.006888875,0.0013193463,0.0023928815,0.0019211282,0.0012537523,0.0014498518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000833424,0.00020790345,0.8440291,0.00035591688,0.00022490553,0.00049367436,0.01671975,0.0031416265,0.0009829119,0.016594646,0.0063741435,0.11004204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015364738,0.00011320699,0.9563655,0.000118921394,0.000026676356,0.00015968156,0.00973262,0.0015380381,0.0003563893,0.0022840947,0.029240487,0.000049042872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038706083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08414295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038706083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036092966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021994454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07696158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795249882","doi":"10.1177/0032321718763558","title":"What Drives People to Protest in an Authoritarian Country? Resources and Rewards vs Risks of Protests in Urban and Rural China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; China; Government (linguistics); Politics; Accountability; Political science; State (computer science); Survey data collection; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.03673454252769359,"score_gpt":0.3768839610016818,"score_spread":0.3401494184739882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795249882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989053,0.000040534727,0.000016385493,0.0002104428,0.000002370946,0.0000033068673,0.000027672484,6.216287e-7,0.0007932951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975294,0.00003288676,0.0000073829606,0.000022796337,0.000002267538,0.0000021078972,0.000023673692,2.8679608e-7,0.00015563278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995047,0.00013536714,0.000032094522,0.00005834513,0.00005851715,0.00021098515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819946,0.00025595826,0.00069452403,0.0000553196,0.00010969401,0.00068489753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007063349,0.00015332083,0.00018892945,0.0009207329,0.001081842,0.0011006802,0.00025367198,0.0003420581,0.0024781926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001454977,0.000145613,0.00020572396,0.0009662368,0.0011208706,0.000542048,0.0009214731,0.0005584951,0.00012647494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002605934,0.00006433476,0.985535,0.00002361569,0.00002878595,0.00012844669,0.009400268,0.0000966049,0.0001297355,0.00065095903,0.00035952253,0.0035566743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003162748,0.000023118415,0.9863064,0.000013093546,0.0000086220625,0.00002615673,0.012485851,0.00027312324,0.00002630447,0.00025139464,0.00057705335,0.0000056823483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03488857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081433006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03488857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013359777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011732196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069370985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886451041","doi":"10.1177/0032321718791370","title":"Political Leaders and Public Engagement: The Hidden World of Informal Elite–Citizen Interaction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Politics; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Deliberation; Public value; Public administration; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Public participation; Public engagement; Constructive; Deliberative democracy; Law; Economics; Process (computing); Management","score_opus":0.27946642443743164,"score_gpt":0.49150088717568285,"score_spread":0.21203446273825122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886451041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903046,0.0028409173,0.044031512,0.029428352,0.00038759792,0.00015148157,0.00010474276,0.00017799545,0.23257291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958794,0.00032124325,0.00084927975,0.00054852973,0.000072884264,0.000052127045,0.000017115295,0.00003292861,0.0022264025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.965484,0.028256748,0.000504814,0.0012143163,0.0024873407,0.0020528107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651204,0.028091596,0.0024316106,0.002319516,0.0007000548,0.0013368689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012605118,0.00040801355,0.0005577934,0.0029056366,0.010787747,0.016537597,0.0011860083,0.0025890393,0.005074319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024886899,0.0005080352,0.0003735723,0.0027564412,0.038682893,0.014425449,0.013644945,0.0035381163,0.00058299943],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001257539,0.00006963612,0.008011839,0.00024677778,0.000041028885,0.00091000827,0.72476715,0.00051078975,0.0008780229,0.2351902,0.0025381322,0.0267106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091106325,0.00017011084,0.006808825,0.00067461614,0.000055840024,0.0007553675,0.5187292,0.0019317665,0.0009937919,0.2963386,0.17336804,0.00008274229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025509112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027053747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016537597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038263316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031210333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06666303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922412555","doi":"10.1177/0032321718819077","title":"Public Opinion, Turnout and Social Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Congruence in European Liberal Democracies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Ideology; Parliament; Turnout; Democracy; Public opinion; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Public policy; Public economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.1714765354386686,"score_gpt":0.44177163119033264,"score_spread":0.27029509575166405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922412555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944706,0.00027716826,0.00011336107,0.000111797235,0.0000039393553,0.000012662483,0.00007307828,0.0000011523226,0.0049362294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995983,0.00007021504,0.0000414937,0.000012203511,0.000004493674,0.000007871999,0.00009041267,0.0000011303567,0.0001739129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959286,0.0026251322,0.00018341454,0.00024391207,0.0003454892,0.0006734018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907521,0.006460739,0.0014889687,0.00025742225,0.0005745335,0.00046618306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054698917,0.00016119283,0.00052413304,0.004334765,0.0013140374,0.0026267937,0.00037538886,0.00055106,0.0055272016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012238888,0.00015854005,0.00040334175,0.0054236115,0.0020720244,0.0020540543,0.0022444362,0.00054086413,0.00021699959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001329575,0.0005870412,0.8438453,0.00032804973,0.00047165004,0.00073599414,0.060277313,0.0019781461,0.0012176044,0.052116178,0.0008525274,0.03626055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043644446,0.00021211403,0.9515404,0.00008353908,0.000066494766,0.00007921037,0.03885816,0.0010089296,0.0002382289,0.0029577997,0.004897596,0.000013975795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00813813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010934682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00813813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026419794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090671005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028927863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965916949","doi":"10.1177/0032321719865111","title":"Calling It Quits: Legislative Retirements in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Devolution (biology); Normative; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Democracy; Face (sociological concept); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2936772604246386,"score_gpt":0.5168762393651253,"score_spread":0.22319897894048668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965916949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764304,0.008076115,0.0006431843,0.0067300852,0.00019194584,0.000020409381,0.00046174476,0.000009569443,0.107436545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388605,0.0015819578,0.00012310257,0.00032734158,0.000114342765,0.000017158458,0.00014505512,0.000005461854,0.0037995602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972536,0.0015932986,0.00009269557,0.00018821126,0.0002886119,0.00058355223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942326,0.0032634712,0.0012653278,0.00020193674,0.0004763051,0.00056030235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004424982,0.00010830228,0.00029784287,0.004184012,0.0033871874,0.0025914442,0.0005684529,0.0008509114,0.013691732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009042393,0.00014130634,0.00020281672,0.004132594,0.0027123955,0.0031207693,0.0020468857,0.00096326414,0.0004207252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037891595,0.0002383506,0.27387276,0.0005630646,0.00011054796,0.0009768489,0.35515958,0.00032357415,0.00056688307,0.24446398,0.014781671,0.10856381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013452699,0.0001762496,0.5831028,0.00043961036,0.00004666392,0.00066885294,0.30324847,0.00023997987,0.00024341125,0.0051727355,0.10661687,0.00003088995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01410968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049815178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01410968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027377857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011063621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045803368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981900083","doi":"10.1177/0032321719880316","title":"Glass Cliffs or Partisan Pressure? Examining Gender and Party Leader Tenures and Exits","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Dalhousie University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Position (finance); Political science; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.25187649936658646,"score_gpt":0.4225138777631914,"score_spread":0.17063737839660492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981900083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99339736,0.00009827493,0.00015282107,0.00023134453,0.000012069102,0.0000056159624,0.000049836184,0.0000023005218,0.006050439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910575,0.000031985604,0.000031258573,0.000024752884,0.000007403831,0.0000022466993,0.000030381047,0.000001946666,0.0007641379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.00040239346,0.000058678062,0.00017026893,0.00046214228,0.00078741397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917105,0.0029296484,0.0027326134,0.00036735876,0.00063806557,0.0016219917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025872742,0.00010849496,0.00033616048,0.00068516866,0.0020715522,0.0018442132,0.00049077877,0.00038484237,0.005643891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118214125,0.00011487902,0.0001890893,0.0008076009,0.0026652615,0.0010650742,0.0012639818,0.00090063585,0.0003301971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021292687,0.00009366615,0.9396599,0.000024920977,0.000031366722,0.00017652696,0.038094312,0.000087167195,0.00049307203,0.002437386,0.00092285697,0.017765768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046915816,0.00006381874,0.95605063,0.00003419077,0.0000070813144,0.000049612776,0.04060927,0.0001150474,0.00015148924,0.0005301323,0.0023750209,0.000009061632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07109207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15498026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07109207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014876504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00168952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14135653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994141134","doi":"10.1177/0032321719881812","title":"How is Political Violence Gendered? Disentangling Motives, Forms, and Impacts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Politics; Hegemony; Political violence; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Gender studies; Poison control; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06463667915082799,"score_gpt":0.37460902212929115,"score_spread":0.30997234297846316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994141134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8049551,0.015785806,0.0110262325,0.027668918,0.0007641513,0.00007019462,0.00026964967,0.000036961508,0.13942291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700326,0.001416817,0.00028020184,0.0005432212,0.0000887351,0.000015349584,0.000026177517,0.000013913743,0.0006122546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98843235,0.007430533,0.0002974398,0.0012028323,0.0014909736,0.0011458498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885233,0.0069858474,0.0019604226,0.0009610273,0.0006988216,0.00087054726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008360517,0.0003976615,0.00095054886,0.0039712302,0.0038192985,0.013978386,0.00096570473,0.0015361857,0.0030328524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021446927,0.0004227772,0.0005686919,0.0029185724,0.023626793,0.008821889,0.0069489926,0.0023626608,0.00027830838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001833336,0.00012852057,0.14725016,0.00044631373,0.00031311423,0.0006545323,0.2952064,0.0003552962,0.0014870202,0.44825274,0.002281706,0.10344093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001989296,0.00018614861,0.18522048,0.0015412694,0.00015877667,0.0010986209,0.3661763,0.0006473814,0.0014739905,0.37744346,0.06593582,0.00009780674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004143268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033728469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013978386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003257171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002141167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044215202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015893541","doi":"10.1177/0032321719895428","title":"Electoral Systems and Policy Congruence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Legislature; Representation (politics); Proportional representation; Elite; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Survey data collection; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Democracy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15170445468747668,"score_gpt":0.4351668922640535,"score_spread":0.2834624375765768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015893541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95191485,0.0004898539,0.0028453174,0.000843371,0.000033743076,0.00004118814,0.00016841541,0.00001652064,0.043646757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922466,0.00008322544,0.00017664098,0.000023023096,0.000013710913,0.000007905831,0.000059411243,0.0000029953712,0.00040840852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247956,0.0045213574,0.00061765866,0.0006600316,0.0009336182,0.00078773143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870588,0.0059744082,0.003964476,0.0011701898,0.0009259775,0.00090615137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005747428,0.0001613786,0.0003587573,0.0026634107,0.0016717409,0.0034841131,0.00042010398,0.00043113044,0.0070446776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031000242,0.00014336524,0.00023204988,0.0042178347,0.0023202698,0.0018311039,0.003687921,0.00067132455,0.00046114955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047490114,0.00024582207,0.70552707,0.00028641938,0.00016600666,0.00025008904,0.02983377,0.0019578554,0.001413464,0.15557773,0.0012696113,0.10299732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006173264,0.0003315764,0.84255093,0.00022435345,0.000047261732,0.00039779075,0.03604779,0.0021202795,0.0009017033,0.083633855,0.033633363,0.00004927602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012657294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012564851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070446776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010129604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007158949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030395627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020115569","doi":"10.1177/0032321720906581","title":"Policy Polarization, Income Inequality and Turnout","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Inequality; Polarization (electrochemistry); Economic inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Survey data collection; Income distribution; Political science; Politics; Voting","score_opus":0.13184710532918809,"score_gpt":0.43252802426081965,"score_spread":0.30068091893163157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020115569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938279,0.0002281236,0.00017148007,0.00018404952,0.000009628756,0.0000049114847,0.0002311728,0.0000037468087,0.005338966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990846,0.00009327618,0.000025334053,0.000014076662,0.00001437611,0.0000033592507,0.00018593862,0.0000015597881,0.00057743496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995689,0.00014341885,0.000022095577,0.000043880496,0.00005135563,0.00017040409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535394,0.0018288798,0.0016495488,0.00018016568,0.0002369932,0.0007505665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008569236,0.0001270331,0.0002479654,0.0009001421,0.0006388686,0.0009963604,0.00014387837,0.00020731817,0.0058931354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00379524,0.00007167829,0.00020922255,0.0009677892,0.0005219357,0.00041270076,0.0008755612,0.0005868146,0.0005172717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012536037,0.000068474146,0.9913816,0.000017325956,0.00006579018,0.000056726847,0.00061501755,0.00029598761,0.00024484703,0.0010156708,0.0003223396,0.005790977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002216518,0.00002858092,0.99775404,0.0000090325375,0.000010953537,0.00002650166,0.0006288828,0.00016209327,0.000114943534,0.00042742727,0.00083287776,0.000002537589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004536717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077543412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058931354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040791382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021074779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019714534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021063476","doi":"10.1177/0032321720911566","title":"The Dark Side of Politics: Participation and the Dark Triad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Narcissism; Dark triad; Psychopathy; Politics; Machiavellianism; Personality; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Normative; Great Rift; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14757661849009704,"score_gpt":0.43137893760802554,"score_spread":0.2838023191179285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021063476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993995,0.00006186976,0.00030598338,0.00038109458,0.0000066186135,0.000003725002,0.000013955276,0.0000019584634,0.005229809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967074,0.000023242912,0.000074940086,0.00002650511,0.00000649465,0.000001947583,0.000008240135,7.0579307e-7,0.00018719706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924743,0.00037289303,0.000025274421,0.00007856544,0.00014693405,0.00012894854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526155,0.001480542,0.0017760134,0.00026914838,0.0001699801,0.0010427161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092279934,0.00017035789,0.00019939005,0.00065864314,0.0007960117,0.0014255763,0.00016181575,0.0003255547,0.0040431167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003205273,0.00009084579,0.00016563303,0.00044068904,0.0018367262,0.0007653339,0.0013860567,0.0010004353,0.00020118133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002981292,0.00029891208,0.94817364,0.000053318432,0.000054840806,0.00043730682,0.009678395,0.00013783111,0.0045184856,0.008775149,0.00035889982,0.027215192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011950453,0.0001492395,0.9836446,0.000030662937,0.0000151633685,0.00049344753,0.007821627,0.0005189637,0.00035956138,0.005678948,0.0012638733,0.000011902682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005174914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010292267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040431167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025590297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000307597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013525546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123517388","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12065","title":"The Problem of Pluralist Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; State (computer science); Politics; Primary authority; Traditional authority; Political authority; Political science; Moral authority; Public authority; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13688601380641846,"score_gpt":0.41377943162889486,"score_spread":0.2768934178224764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045630194,0.003727974,0.086168155,0.14971833,0.0012556082,0.000071074996,0.00007142173,0.00013488962,0.7132223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648538,0.00068442477,0.007644871,0.0061230334,0.0011946557,0.00013083684,0.00002741673,0.00009826515,0.0192427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765022,0.011342768,0.00084155734,0.0036241577,0.005676518,0.0020128498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836213,0.005679053,0.0009192357,0.0023215024,0.0017666289,0.0009513976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021042926,0.0004542817,0.00091538613,0.0017620199,0.013571996,0.010010385,0.002214877,0.0059333555,0.004644462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022449654,0.0005326594,0.0011555011,0.0011822855,0.066136785,0.01566481,0.011451964,0.012937317,0.000944247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019060959,0.0000019253946,0.000026334183,0.0000039132788,0.0000013342885,0.000011786127,0.0013015298,0.000041273004,0.000014024993,0.9974215,0.0004919829,0.0006825439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007559031,0.0000034050463,0.00003192429,0.000018086022,0.0000016513534,0.00002066588,0.0004331858,0.00015281848,0.000031529744,0.9841613,0.015133685,0.000004262726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041037956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026409996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021042926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071343533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00698809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152511","doi":"10.1177/0032321720981491","title":"The Role of Self-Interest in Deliberation: A Theory of Deliberative Capital","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Divestment; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Facilitator; Social capital; Capital (architecture); Process (computing); Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Democracy; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06064784188447204,"score_gpt":0.3592029060114349,"score_spread":0.29855506412696287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124152511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16118258,0.0031540408,0.36081073,0.028866617,0.00032706378,0.00056034466,0.00015800989,0.00031269612,0.44462782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741048,0.00059808674,0.018840048,0.0006328864,0.00009040202,0.00031165223,0.0000369364,0.000056402234,0.0053286916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98533756,0.010590598,0.00034425815,0.0013131493,0.0012003706,0.001214127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95921856,0.030662302,0.003743336,0.0032417292,0.0014305041,0.0017036702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0127168335,0.0006712887,0.0005121688,0.0022734413,0.0033219291,0.008526478,0.0018292529,0.0029364577,0.0058857957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030146498,0.00047017878,0.0011420725,0.0019126311,0.033132307,0.015235817,0.0065767337,0.003710234,0.0008284982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005171038,0.00006614092,0.0019886123,0.00016854453,0.000026708518,0.00014244183,0.028020537,0.0017692703,0.00028929778,0.95681393,0.0005438933,0.010118847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033129872,0.00006342518,0.0013773435,0.00019430234,0.000023167364,0.00010771272,0.00734044,0.0038215108,0.0004912754,0.96721643,0.019297043,0.000034289398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016973006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009731306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127168335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004366895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044422494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06725383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137093276","doi":"10.1177/0032321721996941","title":"The Grammar of Social Power: Power-to, Power-with, Power-despite and Power-over","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022562953300177376,"score_gpt":0.33760379974430127,"score_spread":0.3150408464441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137093276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042364858,0.008106171,0.16456276,0.048596047,0.0011903193,0.00012211813,0.00018485487,0.00019253185,0.73468035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971076,0.0019189868,0.013714073,0.0018823836,0.000565179,0.00018872933,0.00007848405,0.00014482377,0.010431321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914296,0.0061353473,0.00023674036,0.000724364,0.0010105629,0.00046344704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940049,0.003927387,0.00055072515,0.000689361,0.000501861,0.0003257774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006340234,0.00085523794,0.00067872484,0.002380102,0.004509303,0.009703146,0.0015115531,0.0022085893,0.003451968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008082915,0.00035846175,0.0007399614,0.0026096674,0.058744963,0.012385564,0.0043817274,0.003910204,0.0005699828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016931004,0.0000012996825,0.000049839007,0.000007715407,0.0000011648278,0.000010150458,0.0019576957,0.000046163448,0.000013206627,0.9966924,0.00036246842,0.00085629395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052242485,0.000005439062,0.000101806,0.00003678655,0.000002553405,0.000036542417,0.0013723006,0.00025106652,0.000034033295,0.9801688,0.017980345,0.0000051286243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028783479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022998904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009703146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044171847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028585272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03353077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160584821","doi":"10.1177/0032321721996939","title":"Shared Membership Beyond National Identity: Deservingness and Solidarity in Diverse Societies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Solidarity; Obligation; Feeling; National identity; Social psychology; Identity (music); Salient; Sociology; Political science; Collective identity; Immigration; Gender studies; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1168210598118165,"score_gpt":0.41268066243432805,"score_spread":0.29585960262251154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160584821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97616833,0.00018502753,0.0003065529,0.0018024124,0.00001854125,0.0000064226188,0.000008352901,0.0000021923875,0.021502176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995254,0.0000369812,0.00004620847,0.000057204015,0.000004068706,0.0000018843267,0.0000035442597,0.0000011141517,0.00032349644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964384,0.0017767227,0.00009495701,0.0002613933,0.0005339667,0.0008947237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957345,0.0008862146,0.00072461495,0.0002747636,0.0004717381,0.0019081413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037987335,0.00020430208,0.0003989795,0.0017762665,0.011896746,0.006671939,0.00081931276,0.00084101956,0.0039187507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068725892,0.00015776989,0.00020286447,0.0014672244,0.013948961,0.003227877,0.010463717,0.001789268,0.00012922887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011241639,0.00021244829,0.16977361,0.00008295351,0.00005926193,0.00074194925,0.73368037,0.00012390215,0.0013077325,0.054255817,0.0010382597,0.03861135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011162206,0.000079928526,0.14989842,0.00014135544,0.000023028879,0.00032862424,0.8187505,0.00023288775,0.00026958677,0.018142486,0.0120904725,0.000031553114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03920281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06286806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03920281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003481877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039062016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077949226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169444523","doi":"10.1177/00323217211018127","title":"The Flying Heads of Settler Colonialism; or the Ideological Erasures of Indigenous Peoples in Political Theorizing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Indigenous; Colonialism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Mythology; Sociology; Gender studies; Race (biology); Political science; Law; History; Ecology","score_opus":0.06344543621993322,"score_gpt":0.39902134240168013,"score_spread":0.33557590618174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169444523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28243923,0.01617632,0.018033903,0.0913031,0.001096321,0.0000556327,0.000029969091,0.00006129807,0.5908042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898727,0.0018033969,0.0012425858,0.0013441772,0.00025681386,0.00002125772,0.000004396847,0.000017152897,0.005437595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968646,0.0021442068,0.000046582034,0.00021129377,0.00033436326,0.00039883037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962069,0.002872111,0.00030449315,0.0002659466,0.00018152768,0.00016892105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049793324,0.00030810066,0.0003284709,0.0013653348,0.0074405866,0.0061822315,0.00081515306,0.0016586714,0.0019648073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049259895,0.00015636538,0.00025400208,0.00111752,0.07429874,0.005997489,0.003274184,0.0033379,0.00012490775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050683225,0.000007116221,0.0003209844,0.000029247178,0.0000021642397,0.00007365731,0.10608839,0.000045652334,0.00006945301,0.8898753,0.00077246845,0.0027106253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015825806,0.000035636094,0.0019031627,0.0004132241,0.00001328308,0.0002261631,0.19638827,0.00054141553,0.00030878448,0.66852874,0.13160428,0.000021228549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008251879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011953476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008251879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003922313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032212024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028458536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181236798","doi":"10.1177/00323217211026189","title":"Winning, Losing, and the Quality of Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Manchester; University of Oxford","keywords":"Democracy; Victory; Salience (neuroscience); Quality (philosophy); Direct democracy; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17132817119918126,"score_gpt":0.47918037959249626,"score_spread":0.307852208393315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181236798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922172,0.000112004294,0.0001904627,0.00042092358,0.000013594273,0.000009128287,0.00005901632,0.0000036003003,0.0069741644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.000018798133,0.000028550836,0.000020877205,0.0000064931974,0.00000225522,0.000038050526,0.0000014031773,0.00028686225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643695,0.0014191587,0.00026885557,0.00033260425,0.0006207001,0.00092178537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830619,0.005026254,0.0065162643,0.0011359295,0.0010230528,0.0032366347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042256583,0.000113152346,0.0003993861,0.0010430461,0.0014116021,0.003488974,0.0003637624,0.0005798371,0.008070041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046485,0.00012724331,0.000323103,0.0010436614,0.002265959,0.0012149006,0.0025172,0.0012649123,0.0005283809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002987049,0.0002631648,0.9713552,0.000054915432,0.00017419664,0.00010357055,0.004946551,0.00034452818,0.00026110164,0.0065774363,0.000921367,0.014699223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018702367,0.0001338531,0.98567307,0.000025485626,0.000021533868,0.00007466506,0.008136212,0.0003649742,0.0001073682,0.003407704,0.002022479,0.000014028267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001991935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032579557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008070041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058839587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043639843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02699703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204369362","doi":"10.1177/00323217211049294","title":"Making the Paris Agreement: Historical Processes and the Drivers of Institutional Design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Cardiff University","keywords":"Gridlock; Agreement; Treaty; Political science; State (computer science); Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15289536635235412,"score_gpt":0.3936076475450433,"score_spread":0.24071228119268917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204369362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3683613,0.005124489,0.045115903,0.03112072,0.00034391988,0.00027373515,0.00034742345,0.00022647626,0.5490861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139094,0.00066860125,0.0019655754,0.00034498944,0.00004324462,0.000047913923,0.000038994105,0.000050079452,0.005449549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903978,0.005815275,0.00026387465,0.0012882443,0.0009532408,0.0012815603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937047,0.0066222707,0.0011974435,0.001308904,0.0009680847,0.0005327984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016903538,0.00032765145,0.00028402792,0.003450446,0.0066583864,0.012216927,0.001446562,0.0020696358,0.0077888453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02273348,0.00045499747,0.00034441243,0.0038908585,0.028236939,0.00830509,0.004357553,0.003265796,0.0006160961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024033305,0.000016299211,0.0031743243,0.000055722707,0.0000106066245,0.00024403381,0.025616903,0.0010641135,0.00013487796,0.9533001,0.001366526,0.0149926385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003544501,0.00008036749,0.020586886,0.00067273364,0.00002950468,0.00037946503,0.06385596,0.00284495,0.0017230113,0.56930596,0.34034792,0.00013789393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011860512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014471113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01782624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01782624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005835621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12933904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207022422","doi":"10.1177/00323217211046329","title":"Policy Preferences Influence Vote Choice When A New Party Emerges: Evidence from the 2017 French Presidential Election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Victory; Instant-runoff voting; Political science; Presidential election; Voting; Group voting ticket; Presidential system; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.17322287594142816,"score_gpt":0.43960503093448594,"score_spread":0.2663821549930578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207022422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99263906,0.00027298596,0.00013044942,0.0009868223,0.000014456955,0.000006607644,0.0003059433,0.0000042211436,0.005639402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851197,0.000100210054,0.00003841164,0.00008616859,0.000023245371,0.000005167005,0.0002605821,0.0000031505065,0.00097104325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976234,0.001360937,0.00008642754,0.00026695718,0.00022683364,0.00043543318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840717,0.009460218,0.0037639837,0.00070497405,0.0010776904,0.0009214029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003973232,0.00017394985,0.0005014689,0.0010173178,0.0012792776,0.0019796253,0.00038759012,0.001015215,0.01094367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011570196,0.00015168391,0.00042426924,0.001032806,0.0008385605,0.0008866146,0.0007717005,0.0008937185,0.0014894501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012369588,0.00037999006,0.9600274,0.00009708399,0.00025923134,0.0002374792,0.0052187587,0.00046225742,0.0006525486,0.004003569,0.0030173429,0.024407472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040352883,0.00014432399,0.9899739,0.000024698624,0.00005899784,0.000038983777,0.0035043117,0.0004669413,0.00016223657,0.00080856425,0.004760031,0.000016711861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037108168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057096265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037108168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001080413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046384058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07378435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214186904","doi":"10.1177/00323217211055560","title":"What Kind of Electoral Outcome do People Think is Good for Democracy?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats; Austrian Science Fund; Vetenskapsrådet; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Parliament; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Electoral system; Outcome (game theory); Representative democracy; Focus (optics); Survey data collection; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14309155121898853,"score_gpt":0.45510622666843537,"score_spread":0.31201467544944683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214186904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660596,0.0005017759,0.0010057843,0.0036777693,0.00005494004,0.000016324188,0.00012987966,0.00000922439,0.028544744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991197,0.00015923078,0.00017597881,0.00019332174,0.000019469431,0.0000062277495,0.000065116015,0.000002432942,0.0002585441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957087,0.002843599,0.00026704874,0.00024202975,0.00057232106,0.00036617985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899907,0.0042627756,0.0030247492,0.0005951073,0.0010627436,0.0010639611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074510234,0.00018053269,0.00037474168,0.0016201485,0.001075594,0.0035877032,0.0002768729,0.00087307434,0.0034990765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013041919,0.0001233847,0.0003249144,0.0013143922,0.0035929962,0.0018508814,0.001054792,0.00095413247,0.000483409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037416426,0.00024033245,0.82357615,0.0004884673,0.00039688754,0.00026629205,0.06327972,0.000509652,0.0011484113,0.027223991,0.004276496,0.07821941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005756147,0.00040020584,0.79702413,0.00037816327,0.000116296345,0.00047654766,0.1528963,0.00080906315,0.0006793615,0.028748337,0.018341787,0.000072235525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090810977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020957093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074510234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053758756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038890867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039405286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212902376","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12072","title":"Emergency Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"State of exception; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; State of emergency; Law; State (computer science); Exceptionalism; Norm (philosophy); Member state; Democracy; Power (physics); Law and economics; Member states; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.08550792841367942,"score_gpt":0.38008325915230745,"score_spread":0.294575330738628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212902376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010712423,0.011655027,0.0028296218,0.019228641,0.0037228032,0.00007123593,0.00072933483,0.00026186262,0.9507891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24655792,0.011257643,0.0027727997,0.021130448,0.0024100472,0.00017683837,0.0016741628,0.00025780086,0.7137624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924374,0.00014448221,0.0000449947,0.00016134289,0.00017938127,0.00022599191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995865,0.000068829424,0.000051425253,0.00006453365,0.00007915286,0.00014949832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009139559,0.00036148596,0.00029972175,0.00079669576,0.002181072,0.004933074,0.00058236136,0.002881296,0.06244057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018855714,0.0001457469,0.00043028407,0.0010076857,0.0010511872,0.0024144792,0.0043322197,0.0025814162,0.009969087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058951584,0.000037695056,0.0009529859,0.00025371244,0.000013543212,0.00092385063,0.0009656761,0.00037815736,0.000389504,0.67188597,0.239652,0.08448796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004732084,0.000008417223,0.0006768982,0.00009409199,0.0000018178611,0.00033559583,0.0001776799,0.000033443313,0.000095628144,0.007931203,0.9906369,0.0000036323622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015220728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06244057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019207873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023697726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20888454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238600222","doi":"10.1177/0032321720964666","title":"Constraining Denaturalization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3394719977652889,"score_gpt":0.4554833585132848,"score_spread":0.1160113607479959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238600222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11682715,0.003581044,0.33792862,0.04463965,0.0015374994,0.00088045595,0.0003905327,0.00071054476,0.49350455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295529,0.0010202925,0.04583607,0.0065747844,0.0005091987,0.0011011333,0.000121572055,0.0003814111,0.014902618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94426566,0.028922811,0.003060678,0.011397025,0.0072740056,0.0050798687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8859735,0.07061181,0.0060707494,0.028649174,0.0072245006,0.0014703402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04960553,0.0007095558,0.0015177397,0.0015822621,0.0061041717,0.010337082,0.0048048,0.005523371,0.008077214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12618516,0.001002725,0.0011447137,0.0013641028,0.037177883,0.01299947,0.014782894,0.012280786,0.0015484269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020762307,0.000014599612,0.00038013374,0.000050027546,0.000010641387,0.000036389432,0.0018665097,0.00032805567,0.0002644159,0.989408,0.000987943,0.0066324514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022115431,0.000031099902,0.00045275752,0.00018037984,0.00002760556,0.00005776397,0.0010416269,0.0010329725,0.0013650544,0.9510465,0.04471144,0.000030530035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058677355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004858374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04960553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062982524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26234227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13798997686747863,"score_gpt":0.4396970784488198,"score_spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243315529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027989626,0.007913787,0.081822306,0.30708003,0.003069713,0.00021407448,0.0001331011,0.00048655004,0.57129097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6889678,0.0025486592,0.014256429,0.19512695,0.0022283206,0.000797157,0.00010936096,0.00048634104,0.095479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96899384,0.013282496,0.0013246575,0.0060808565,0.0071032336,0.0032148822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98008865,0.009170607,0.0020134703,0.0042726644,0.0033964224,0.0010582443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038378473,0.00100216,0.0013428592,0.0015686817,0.011857975,0.010985642,0.0031187257,0.01576378,0.0062371674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039326143,0.00051532785,0.0016274251,0.0013043948,0.0668948,0.013268668,0.014826271,0.028083753,0.0020386763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006568244,0.000005460284,0.00009597468,0.000017451559,0.000006342938,0.000018091228,0.0015105953,0.00005042182,0.000043417727,0.99104226,0.004855058,0.002348355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026194079,0.000033572684,0.00031463683,0.0003178189,0.000019591442,0.00011427417,0.0017169669,0.0004190535,0.00062047254,0.75660694,0.2397788,0.000031648262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008194255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007350233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038378473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069866744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094720265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20296723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252357135","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00755.x","title":"Patriotic Virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dartmouth College","keywords":"Virtue; Liberalism; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criticism; Sociology; Patriotism; Classical liberalism; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21251296162175656,"score_gpt":0.4166120778362671,"score_spread":0.20409911621451052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252357135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027430674,0.0015657742,0.021248125,0.018824942,0.00028634293,0.000051370393,0.000042777483,0.00009129379,0.93045866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479814,0.00075862405,0.005100839,0.0063816267,0.00033615102,0.00010032778,0.000038420363,0.000045692108,0.03925681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785787,0.00089720346,0.0000739549,0.00041772012,0.00051072356,0.00024259588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983772,0.00045916627,0.00022194578,0.0003773895,0.00033776302,0.00022654806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024531516,0.00022849164,0.00034398242,0.0007291996,0.003007824,0.003935153,0.0004987676,0.0019364429,0.0054059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003048903,0.00017827879,0.00032199293,0.00039116968,0.020789284,0.0023359791,0.0036426333,0.0032283724,0.0014199073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024810947,0.0000046676246,0.00022015857,0.000011609793,0.0000017895077,0.000024312309,0.0007699602,0.00003339313,0.000064821266,0.99423665,0.0018979164,0.002732382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009305593,0.000023890208,0.0009285502,0.00006584049,0.0000034414084,0.00024548525,0.00066994526,0.00031585808,0.00018475145,0.8368003,0.16074494,0.0000077758705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005965889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074824295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001496947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013602154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018084526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283775561","doi":"10.1177/00323217221105170","title":"Revisiting Elite Perceptions as Mediator of Elite Responsiveness to Public Opinion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Research Council; Universiteit Antwerpen","keywords":"Elite; Delegate; Perception; Politics; Public opinion; Representation (politics); Political science; Action (physics); Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.12439182780098013,"score_gpt":0.44466759501859854,"score_spread":0.3202757672176184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283775561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920465,0.000043087734,0.00031410423,0.00026166867,0.000009827517,0.000015290072,0.000033977452,0.000004921776,0.0072706956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956375,0.000012295011,0.000057861114,0.000032186166,0.000007947156,0.0000058969663,0.00001691335,0.0000020248488,0.0003010495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613285,0.0024745988,0.000116667805,0.00032822366,0.00041189993,0.00053580507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762932,0.017207857,0.0032074566,0.0010167658,0.0008124169,0.0014622813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060796593,0.00020631503,0.00039244673,0.0010027139,0.00094325794,0.0029054612,0.0003317018,0.00060705154,0.009698543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019061925,0.00019114568,0.00038008596,0.0008153528,0.0015156211,0.0011511906,0.0017299001,0.0009241866,0.0003938618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000681184,0.00081800105,0.95258963,0.00010614769,0.00024137992,0.00028647634,0.019657003,0.0004110299,0.0021595752,0.006179957,0.0005423466,0.016327152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039465587,0.00032090856,0.98045635,0.00003499006,0.00008799253,0.00004096605,0.013298201,0.0012890552,0.00052558497,0.0027624934,0.0011303237,0.00001371224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030062217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002478302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009698543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063475437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007705813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032444835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378215977","doi":"10.1177/00323217231173800","title":"Populist Democrats? Unpacking the Relationship Between Populist and Democratic Attitudes at the Citizen Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Populism; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Representative democracy; Political science; Direct democracy; Political economy; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.36296507800102873,"score_gpt":0.4560002516589876,"score_spread":0.09303517365795888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378215977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98720294,0.00033356625,0.00032714478,0.0013468937,0.00001237922,0.0000047459084,0.000024309886,0.0000020066022,0.010746104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995652,0.00010391997,0.000053014857,0.0000730447,0.000012088273,0.000003056222,0.000010887298,0.0000013302498,0.00017756745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856913,0.00066853646,0.000060291546,0.00020043473,0.00023157474,0.00027007554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99088216,0.004819592,0.0024998742,0.00055436726,0.00039418263,0.0008498639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025634798,0.00015402756,0.00027807045,0.0017952345,0.0010444307,0.0023784484,0.00027184418,0.00056199514,0.0040141465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009172456,0.00014752022,0.000278805,0.0019410076,0.003098629,0.0023245465,0.0022898766,0.0014621957,0.00018156017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007737067,0.00018123534,0.9059605,0.000086393935,0.0001562464,0.00017282947,0.027023118,0.0002948613,0.00062059524,0.040658675,0.00041420312,0.024353987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008312277,0.00006694633,0.96866846,0.000056261568,0.000033486496,0.000067276065,0.01645466,0.0005427037,0.00015455893,0.010016508,0.0039178277,0.000013140253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004304392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005508012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004304392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006203256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080561714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013557136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391051768","doi":"10.1177/00323217231223400","title":"Minority Affirmations and the Boundaries of the Nation: Evidence From Québec","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Ethnic group; Salient; Social psychology; Sociology; Nationalism; Construct (python library); Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11316003091109915,"score_gpt":0.41706582571939504,"score_spread":0.3039057948082959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391051768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98496467,0.0012058654,0.00020840527,0.0012664193,0.00002109225,0.00004347896,0.0011006431,0.000005406569,0.011183965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971209,0.00039541695,0.00009624213,0.00018373696,0.0000041769454,0.000018801316,0.00029478053,0.0000051972115,0.0018806843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828124,0.00052623654,0.000059214708,0.00024381909,0.0004345219,0.00045503164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473966,0.004111654,0.0025462185,0.00066349615,0.0060698856,0.0018691154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031385857,0.00031038138,0.00048716448,0.0019700225,0.008112345,0.0024974665,0.0016294623,0.0007705593,0.0065017957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009426734,0.0002552981,0.00029739,0.0031420696,0.0028942684,0.00096347113,0.0016837344,0.0011091717,0.00028743775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041121445,0.00022695606,0.88216424,0.00023956707,0.00015350596,0.00040103318,0.07363141,0.00029064325,0.00058566435,0.0028147285,0.0065091783,0.032571875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001984284,0.00004483182,0.962902,0.00018044254,0.000051834697,0.00005557605,0.029200127,0.00034144803,0.0001790192,0.00017078954,0.006827127,0.00002678274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99511176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99786854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027879693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027879693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02279109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20228225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408468988","doi":"10.1177/00323217251324025","title":"Perceived Democraticness of Parties From Citizens’ Perspectives: Evidence From Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.09630308236206331,"score_gpt":0.39963906023977985,"score_spread":0.30333597787771654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408468988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98648006,0.00011918742,0.00006142601,0.0008608248,0.000006904281,0.00002107303,0.0002447954,0.00000192043,0.012203761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979576,0.00015955223,0.000044468692,0.00016984895,0.0000029381122,0.000008970907,0.00016537542,0.000003064462,0.0014880984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595153,0.0007841223,0.00012039478,0.00033042437,0.0017136054,0.0010999267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907554,0.0027125021,0.0017991748,0.0005503359,0.004292078,0.0015704358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005111738,0.00017822796,0.00035479944,0.0013939143,0.010333267,0.0036469898,0.0008296817,0.00068172475,0.005145622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274604,0.00023287992,0.000333025,0.0034860324,0.0037847022,0.00086902373,0.0021146506,0.0014776109,0.00029169107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027185344,0.00017669203,0.7484353,0.00012429655,0.000058359165,0.00026831802,0.21462294,0.00016098858,0.0005691192,0.005064941,0.0051562036,0.025090894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022248118,0.00004167919,0.8317604,0.000113165675,0.000029500005,0.000042303946,0.1523816,0.0002554624,0.00026665084,0.00041053764,0.014629972,0.000046535224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99426234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027605174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027605174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030646918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2002905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408552092","doi":"10.1177/00323217251323404","title":"Defining the Contours of Religion, State, and Modernity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; State (computer science); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.030700481378550807,"score_gpt":0.40324842165232266,"score_spread":0.37254794027377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408552092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98346347,0.00042687912,0.0010147461,0.00149195,0.000013942942,0.000005176088,0.000016021682,0.0000024744854,0.013565401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970204,0.00005410827,0.00012064745,0.00002985707,0.0000056888407,0.0000012148404,0.0000040122227,7.783584e-7,0.00008163244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927145,0.00046130235,0.000025066645,0.00007275853,0.00008007805,0.000089418245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494004,0.0020341931,0.0017433668,0.0003854204,0.0003173416,0.0005795344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018480892,0.000084407955,0.00015348276,0.0010755345,0.00091506646,0.0030124465,0.00026287793,0.0003787832,0.0015697157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066011567,0.00009507732,0.00013674487,0.0007407121,0.005831938,0.0024229472,0.001900163,0.0011573662,0.00007104541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019255064,0.00013364063,0.6445262,0.00006100021,0.000047078687,0.00019764109,0.0801689,0.00032233985,0.0023078592,0.2041755,0.00046345327,0.06740384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012810025,0.00016120191,0.8196607,0.00014950985,0.000032760745,0.00025966117,0.09847486,0.0015851575,0.000588446,0.07176502,0.0072779963,0.0000317654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016989844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026907404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030124465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077069295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044883988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009773731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410806931","doi":"10.1177/00323217251338491","title":"Personality and (Negative) Partisanship in Canadian Federal Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Personality; Political science; Social psychology; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05048873707881063,"score_gpt":0.34598958018548287,"score_spread":0.29550084310667224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410806931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891417,0.00014023077,0.000056726425,0.0003455503,0.000011608948,0.000007355033,0.00017460244,0.0000026061723,0.010119704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984036,0.00007618638,0.000039690418,0.00003427681,0.0000031760708,0.0000019741165,0.00007219025,0.0000018480437,0.0013670856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990783,0.00010262057,0.000021194086,0.00008014943,0.0003345026,0.00038317917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971992,0.00030827257,0.00039951003,0.00010373244,0.0009730275,0.0010163119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011900262,0.00013343783,0.00021183568,0.001742899,0.0072074365,0.0014933157,0.00039725515,0.00027777103,0.0035146184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033626966,0.00014358439,0.00021321238,0.0021020873,0.0019414852,0.00030792033,0.0010136092,0.0006697183,0.00015594786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013368123,0.00004472426,0.9529673,0.000030696494,0.000038120408,0.0001491029,0.020985141,0.00020391439,0.00062295946,0.0039070738,0.002660055,0.018257353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023500993,0.0000056231775,0.99113315,0.000012304976,0.0000047815447,0.00002241996,0.0062966426,0.000112024136,0.000043006214,0.00012514894,0.0022347532,0.000007774459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97944266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020557344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01591621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014473084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11548078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}