{"meta":{"query_hash":"ce7c0b976c56","filters":{"venue":"Political Theory"},"cohort_total":83,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"exported":83,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ce7c0b976c56","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1966583833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707302196","title":"From Honor to Dignity and Back Again: Remarks on LaVaque-Manty's “Dueling for Equality”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Dignity; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09210073930510225,"score_gpt":0.4036069734791128,"score_spread":0.3115062341740105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966583833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006576717,0.006030397,0.0040622,0.8770722,0.010893916,0.000043812197,0.000110500834,0.000050362167,0.0951598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24679299,0.002286366,0.0027116593,0.6673969,0.016848251,0.00034716286,0.00004354595,0.00022890659,0.063344225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867875,0.0042401496,0.00050014636,0.0028811728,0.0018273721,0.001872299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98989254,0.0073308544,0.00045418035,0.00053666934,0.001158309,0.0006273711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125049995,0.0010482576,0.00206724,0.0014822868,0.020234413,0.013163047,0.0056721237,0.052725453,0.009496283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024722923,0.00097555027,0.0016247226,0.0018634852,0.0752872,0.016740276,0.00963717,0.058715228,0.0018528751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013305831,0.0000069744074,0.0000365529,0.000015840398,0.0000072586777,0.000051304938,0.0030293078,0.0000314074,0.00003070976,0.95196545,0.044072744,0.0007391893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006917275,0.000017073842,0.00035790427,0.0002122048,0.000020446645,0.0001115482,0.0028340383,0.00022901394,0.00023569241,0.7486138,0.24722199,0.00007717903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049122967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056605767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052725453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014620326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085939355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10607839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975290864","doi":"10.1177/0090591705274867","title":"Normativizing Hybridity/Neutralizing Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Essentialism; Identity (music); Orthodoxy; Politics; Sociology; Identity politics; Cultural identity; Epistemology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.04172689706387978,"score_gpt":0.3666921770762609,"score_spread":0.3249652800123811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975290864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114750616,0.00087044545,0.20403934,0.018063609,0.0010778874,0.000078986224,0.000045505938,0.00018917315,0.6608844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814874,0.0001498113,0.010429614,0.0013799783,0.0000925884,0.00008217621,0.000016624312,0.000063818974,0.0062979744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98986477,0.0063824398,0.00035702085,0.0012448198,0.0014843218,0.00066655193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991995,0.0035151732,0.00062801084,0.0019524802,0.001448024,0.00046133227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010004659,0.00041352105,0.00048898987,0.00084711524,0.003065191,0.005781211,0.0010290537,0.0017057281,0.003527935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012660782,0.00027014798,0.0005726222,0.0004572706,0.034514654,0.0077181174,0.008443283,0.0038046874,0.0004409956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063768543,0.000004695052,0.00009684253,0.0000113639835,0.0000031407785,0.000015766318,0.0017355244,0.00007190976,0.00019565677,0.99619234,0.00019621396,0.0014700746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011041022,0.000013610224,0.00010028418,0.000023431647,0.000006579341,0.000046949117,0.002390319,0.00045606788,0.0006890581,0.9838562,0.012398445,0.000008039826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013221224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013033585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010004659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025590032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020961722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052910328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977534503","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276383","title":"The Federal Structure of a Republic of Reasons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Classical liberalism; The Republic; Original position; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03677186889086934,"score_gpt":0.3475646313101299,"score_spread":0.3107927624192605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977534503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07545888,0.0017630985,0.05751175,0.024887245,0.0004845267,0.00013114768,0.00038562,0.00027487648,0.8391028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494949,0.00033811718,0.012436709,0.002090491,0.00018414458,0.00015136547,0.00017838206,0.00004779507,0.035078034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664307,0.0013086945,0.0001247355,0.0006304812,0.0005780266,0.0007150737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772066,0.00066858786,0.00030084848,0.000546912,0.00052484224,0.00023819033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002785553,0.00014392572,0.0003318372,0.0013319231,0.0060986658,0.0061595067,0.0004015566,0.0020323687,0.0076067224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004577891,0.00036643495,0.0006509087,0.001222238,0.007781861,0.0031683154,0.002451929,0.0030086767,0.0011699141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381481,0.000002082301,0.000092456125,0.0000027983626,0.0000011691428,0.0000036383817,0.00011007775,0.00005988209,0.000025067919,0.9977063,0.0009344615,0.0010581355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024815507,0.000017412962,0.0016000994,0.000039866125,0.000014835281,0.000037554546,0.0001945316,0.0009363868,0.00016640201,0.89817953,0.09877339,0.000015092389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00828787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013358284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00828787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004788275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005585752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03474158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987636686","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332336","title":"Rhetoric and the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":560,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; State (computer science); Sociology; Public administration; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03162158993094817,"score_gpt":0.3318990754674336,"score_spread":0.3002774855364854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987636686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034316346,0.0187066,0.03220503,0.108257055,0.0018278873,0.000059934322,0.00005675609,0.00013438004,0.8044359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677864,0.0046418062,0.003457298,0.005628302,0.0013924451,0.00011065902,0.000039562943,0.00009133031,0.016852338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881762,0.00840147,0.00024179154,0.00070639036,0.0017884156,0.0006856881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98056567,0.015973255,0.0011469566,0.000775885,0.001065984,0.0004723464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011093038,0.0005714407,0.0006011695,0.0036121083,0.009278904,0.014368377,0.0009770957,0.004570813,0.004609835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018018892,0.00032038442,0.00043706372,0.002488882,0.052003164,0.014790993,0.0061842767,0.0057052257,0.000972986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034009804,0.00000412403,0.00003692974,0.000022760867,0.0000011464705,0.000018156743,0.0035660076,0.000065672975,0.000029461777,0.9928532,0.001226312,0.0021727895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011629925,0.000012484325,0.00009493349,0.00015360002,0.0000037156162,0.000042974807,0.002856764,0.00022647029,0.00013215351,0.92472005,0.0717392,0.0000060652847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011640443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006921877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014368377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006294729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005301425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000369785","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451715","title":"Global Justice, Historical Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Global justice; Sociology; Metaphysics; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0887236929548679,"score_gpt":0.38837986710509975,"score_spread":0.2996561741502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000369785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015457789,0.037616692,0.010807667,0.19751303,0.0028405043,0.00003290232,0.000097883305,0.00005897106,0.73557454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890435,0.01210024,0.0034863283,0.04443066,0.0041129556,0.00009553327,0.00009638481,0.0001355593,0.046498887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943808,0.002756044,0.00012711191,0.00091215124,0.0010421422,0.00078181387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955858,0.0023318834,0.0004112772,0.00069096265,0.00046268903,0.0005173956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056742434,0.000535263,0.0005644689,0.0018789495,0.006281318,0.010259651,0.00087378843,0.005193587,0.006700807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071371435,0.00016816941,0.00032162416,0.0020952069,0.0516085,0.0125827445,0.005825922,0.007854964,0.000824457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002565445,0.0000046256773,0.0000974441,0.000019188978,0.0000022251504,0.000013121024,0.0010329814,0.00003315422,0.000015146675,0.9914141,0.004147295,0.0032181498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042650317,0.0000067128194,0.00035219063,0.00009674857,0.0000036145732,0.000046199693,0.0021137083,0.00005380659,0.000044294975,0.85070825,0.14656562,0.000004502465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035950406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050725834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010259651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054618022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039972207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039628327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005293593","doi":"10.1177/0090591704273537","title":"Robert Denoon Cumming (1916-2004)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.021386210039054984,"score_gpt":0.3168376441080261,"score_spread":0.2954514340689711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005293593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00523148,0.40303454,0.0018874449,0.29641396,0.100933716,0.00007388941,0.0003149001,0.000081529724,0.19202854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04271329,0.078009345,0.0009842676,0.03546563,0.010942285,0.00004531892,0.000087716144,0.0000849887,0.8316672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899477,0.00030477915,0.000040042356,0.00020310919,0.00034387733,0.00011337529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870896,0.00037855646,0.00009853363,0.0000757844,0.000436754,0.00030143035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019741931,0.0005796623,0.0004827337,0.0018960724,0.0037511988,0.0024502852,0.0005379533,0.0020043945,0.019824926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055324226,0.00034472777,0.00026892786,0.0017833667,0.0023759413,0.0034425065,0.0017635872,0.004181855,0.004902753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002799367,0.000026778293,0.00042682703,0.0002240195,0.0000075381026,0.00010203153,0.0028464515,0.00007382647,0.00010565738,0.06358361,0.86291826,0.06965703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010720261,0.000005151273,0.00041382923,0.000118668024,0.0000017876757,0.00004912795,0.0002468932,0.00001573691,0.00006206838,0.0028244383,0.9962573,0.0000038821563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02860629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052383024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02860629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005989435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044002756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066320956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016158199","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299808","title":"Citizenship as Inherited Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Politics; Scrutiny; Citizenship; Realm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Analogy; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052380025567756144,"score_gpt":0.34489306100206124,"score_spread":0.29251303543430507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016158199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25873467,0.0020595505,0.04072539,0.011055676,0.00017722945,0.000054787313,0.000120778626,0.000060472852,0.6870114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888769,0.00021192705,0.0010441499,0.00026770527,0.00007219255,0.000022962651,0.000014970738,0.000012201678,0.009477105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706036,0.0012292123,0.00012056964,0.0005172929,0.0005101042,0.00056250446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977665,0.0009613547,0.00022263441,0.00063307467,0.00026100487,0.00015548585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027035638,0.00016822458,0.00022538775,0.00085491885,0.002822138,0.005882596,0.0006890978,0.001508639,0.0037672997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696399,0.00014947166,0.00028250233,0.0006719614,0.025617402,0.00457106,0.003433937,0.0023542843,0.00032732054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017228405,0.0000031098052,0.00029503566,0.0000034592674,0.0000013868414,0.000028618653,0.0008787702,0.000085396176,0.000052874228,0.996985,0.00011845711,0.001546205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010152554,0.000023143062,0.0010812017,0.000034482375,0.000010753198,0.00012620384,0.0009356906,0.00060919946,0.0002828497,0.97154164,0.025337307,0.0000073235533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042115664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040345215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005882596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030927632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018470427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022439718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524797","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030001003","title":"Beyond Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08188175393542789,"score_gpt":0.35654160224484394,"score_spread":0.27465984830941603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022524797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059589,0.018283157,0.04840861,0.085759945,0.0015132449,0.00005398937,0.0004117867,0.00007782377,0.83489555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77631575,0.011298094,0.010508404,0.009198899,0.0019227946,0.00020651505,0.00030190102,0.00026781813,0.18997984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944787,0.0030403878,0.00016793744,0.0008754938,0.00093262776,0.0005048142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266475,0.0042913053,0.00027812127,0.0013206698,0.0009896487,0.0004555248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006557732,0.0005741272,0.0007767229,0.0012196115,0.0035947738,0.009537884,0.0014965166,0.0040435526,0.03340893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011397662,0.0003104317,0.00074339495,0.0015914267,0.016504258,0.010814276,0.004063172,0.005252925,0.0035332865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000571784,0.0000030957628,0.00004054198,0.000012355247,0.000002274957,0.000008208866,0.00019042291,0.00010882488,0.000008166857,0.99345464,0.003131725,0.0030340462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005280912,0.0000034899404,0.00005998035,0.00005565717,0.0000026742714,0.000014056373,0.00020207724,0.0003054577,0.000027281625,0.91151065,0.08781039,0.0000029813289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056225685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00514552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03340893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072614234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004851518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111764014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023998101","doi":"10.1177/0090591700028006008","title":"Review Essay on Thucydides","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04364299207181617,"score_gpt":0.37682449002257706,"score_spread":0.3331814979507609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023998101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095681474,0.34350458,0.0011339048,0.4189725,0.15936986,0.000020334279,0.00014975508,0.000019335721,0.07587294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034644596,0.4198383,0.0013870355,0.11913021,0.26420876,0.00008706819,0.00022401633,0.00011361423,0.16036636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993678,0.00023396626,0.000031069994,0.00011257407,0.00021014764,0.000044422053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746037,0.0015975009,0.00012246537,0.0001025011,0.00060241343,0.000114729795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019755606,0.0006048374,0.0009218771,0.0027913142,0.0027556142,0.002856147,0.0009464618,0.0034662702,0.012943791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004453364,0.00018967237,0.00029617277,0.003111454,0.004410302,0.0046682656,0.0017836501,0.0038531993,0.0026850621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002134169,0.000010479188,0.00005268993,0.00036040836,0.0000069092594,0.000036759688,0.000332608,0.0000669345,0.00004862702,0.10706948,0.8596636,0.032330126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006134964,0.0000048056077,0.000111340734,0.00038216574,0.000003962175,0.000055705445,0.0001988998,0.000026090298,0.00003573488,0.020247022,0.9789245,0.000003575252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032647885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051782657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012943791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024580678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024080111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043301344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027072966","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366387","title":"Book in Review: Rescuing Justice and Equality, by G. A. Cohen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. 448 pp. $45.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034820391461184284,"score_gpt":0.32706486561880294,"score_spread":0.29224447415761867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027072966","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034073935,0.9748742,0.00021107019,0.0107621625,0.009361531,0.000016075368,0.00015708069,0.000030345347,0.004553593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011584007,0.9492584,0.0005096759,0.012694504,0.015677541,0.00007646397,0.00031504093,0.00006835555,0.020241551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.00037164785,0.00017890778,0.00019664117,0.0008191242,0.00010101372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331266,0.0037467047,0.0006396049,0.00013327872,0.0017461381,0.00042163034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500023,0.0022804597,0.0028523037,0.007378007,0.001010374,0.0038785124,0.0021310302,0.0035660437,0.025648236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012221958,0.0011905947,0.0011141314,0.007830616,0.0023683796,0.004407602,0.0012808053,0.00502206,0.020964133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019050602,0.0000066669427,0.000042498537,0.0013031313,0.00003004011,0.000021476337,0.00003131184,0.000041779887,0.00004748231,0.0013947058,0.9681018,0.028960073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026206657,0.000018380942,0.00068303844,0.0027220107,0.000050690505,0.0002757892,0.00006439074,0.00003857419,0.00006915223,0.005268411,0.99076426,0.000019006402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010679698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022431793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025648236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039542313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069661736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0858019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045498150","doi":"10.1177/0090591706286986","title":"The Unsettled and Unsettling Claims of Culture","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006093930751230042,"score_gpt":0.2674621643246079,"score_spread":0.26136823357337785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045498150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10934362,0.01185654,0.029836642,0.33160132,0.0018468277,0.00004989974,0.00037391094,0.000097249496,0.514994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746484,0.0014129911,0.0022695595,0.012507573,0.0012392728,0.000077981895,0.000052041156,0.00007643203,0.0077156597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933147,0.0037402129,0.0001957474,0.0009992679,0.0012369282,0.0005131755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97660726,0.0144456895,0.001307233,0.004637537,0.0017959462,0.0012063024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008865626,0.00045313904,0.0009773565,0.0032082438,0.0070770155,0.010405745,0.0023158246,0.0069982065,0.0077881087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020837517,0.0005189706,0.00057326327,0.0024983708,0.11565238,0.02774139,0.0073327855,0.0109244855,0.000653656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059891227,0.0000051843544,0.000116249474,0.000011091169,0.0000043525274,0.000011456124,0.0014858732,0.000043023712,0.000023868213,0.9956071,0.0010863662,0.001599381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052551345,0.0000024537335,0.00013697795,0.000019157113,0.0000026397122,0.0000126832765,0.0007991705,0.00008799691,0.000030252288,0.9940918,0.004806852,0.0000046966716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003587376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039239605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010405745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032928933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027129296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046886444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072658130","doi":"10.1177/0090591706295106","title":"Book Review: Political Obligations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05276057819546925,"score_gpt":0.40054184326514547,"score_spread":0.3477812650696762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072658130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001644656,0.7282399,0.0009426033,0.089517616,0.078929156,0.00005045678,0.0006003754,0.000106929525,0.10144848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039027147,0.6294997,0.0007160588,0.040831283,0.07917138,0.00018828061,0.00087804336,0.00021159854,0.244601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874854,0.00029882166,0.00006758862,0.00013320257,0.00067458214,0.000077164186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944464,0.0031103455,0.00035720482,0.00023508065,0.001442054,0.00040890783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014799562,0.0011141818,0.002257072,0.0063533243,0.0012256257,0.004123183,0.0015465483,0.0048574517,0.090319574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00960263,0.00069007673,0.00055763737,0.010595463,0.0020481562,0.0043148478,0.0019777713,0.0055211424,0.035311982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033078395,0.0000045987954,0.000013725933,0.0003501016,0.0000033942717,0.000006131783,0.000008870922,0.00003776135,0.000009911067,0.003251366,0.9735156,0.022795293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065440686,0.0000036802207,0.000109783905,0.0007389997,0.000006046084,0.000039553313,0.000015890679,0.000018007186,0.000008703696,0.0030581257,0.9959914,0.0000033004485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055886502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013185289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090319574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037073568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062273243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30214906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073087360","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340136","title":"Communicating Depth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Intersubjectivity; Praxis; Epistemology; Existentialism; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06044201083906416,"score_gpt":0.36922536650107823,"score_spread":0.3087833556620141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073087360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023163005,0.0028010295,0.0138988225,0.029226623,0.0032453693,0.00006378595,0.0003112899,0.0002739759,0.94786274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29475716,0.0060076173,0.010104526,0.016276907,0.0033706427,0.00028022774,0.0006463005,0.0012645915,0.66729194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963946,0.0014785067,0.00014297648,0.0005366488,0.0010168224,0.00043037668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963605,0.0015179566,0.00024812738,0.0008416537,0.000653501,0.00037825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027429028,0.00083655166,0.0004751667,0.0012521502,0.004423069,0.010841972,0.0013914931,0.0034658485,0.094209045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013042108,0.00035613735,0.0005770914,0.0011570625,0.0073394077,0.014451628,0.011471079,0.00509329,0.029338794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003545835,0.000010286898,0.00013485202,0.00013159633,0.000008636378,0.000174881,0.021496993,0.00008126976,0.0004240601,0.8518958,0.09335505,0.03225102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062211916,0.0000074390978,0.00007725858,0.00017590051,0.000003480957,0.0001186836,0.004666744,0.00007569543,0.00023590159,0.07877888,0.9158469,0.000006773822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015649772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017745045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094209045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038130414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033589336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31516063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075443705","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485377","title":"Book Review: <i>Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought</i> : Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Eds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Contextualism; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0791029846245056,"score_gpt":0.338774500448251,"score_spread":0.2596715158237454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075443705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013795191,0.90203327,0.0004017592,0.050296064,0.028047876,0.000016295053,0.00019552973,0.000031997588,0.018839246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034771105,0.85819966,0.0006021304,0.028379126,0.039478865,0.00007528526,0.0003543277,0.00011329572,0.069320165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990558,0.00024487055,0.000046367535,0.00011196556,0.00047995025,0.000061088576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956351,0.0027414751,0.0002683839,0.00009125835,0.0010368899,0.00022694057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013543719,0.0007448856,0.0018117324,0.0030465834,0.0009442928,0.0047366703,0.001139522,0.0026374313,0.027786361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005812485,0.0005245086,0.00050210475,0.0076941727,0.0017981518,0.0037920768,0.0013053126,0.003977894,0.013207575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070845877,0.000005197218,0.00003792152,0.00080623163,0.000009498869,0.000009336044,0.00005707023,0.000046814814,0.000034112298,0.004523056,0.95635027,0.038113303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007430258,0.0000056475124,0.00018205958,0.0013588269,0.000012984133,0.000060146045,0.00007484097,0.000028940327,0.000026202042,0.0030944548,0.99514234,0.0000060810844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006809092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019087877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027786361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027838938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005392976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092954695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081728906","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340137","title":"The Radical Hobbes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03198801902196852,"score_gpt":0.2588037024958945,"score_spread":0.226815683473926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081728906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058018547,0.00695539,0.009400103,0.037876055,0.0039230348,0.000021765245,0.00006685434,0.000055140983,0.93589973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4426915,0.004281539,0.0047896462,0.015418459,0.004879009,0.0001586516,0.000077376084,0.00023885827,0.527465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.00088617223,0.00003283921,0.00024254898,0.00029249597,0.00017382648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.0006885779,0.00005761659,0.00028203177,0.0001388309,0.00014842313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022614638,0.0005775853,0.0005234019,0.0013200641,0.0073508034,0.0072176903,0.00083441933,0.0034818107,0.020525573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038622075,0.00028720137,0.0003347956,0.00084609026,0.0298586,0.0056791394,0.0035265605,0.006853583,0.0036989208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020557386,0.0000023884359,0.0000086133505,0.000003828988,5.0334154e-7,0.0000031882869,0.00053075067,0.000011000812,0.000010128751,0.99330306,0.0048960373,0.0012284658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006150347,0.0000047475914,0.000054750406,0.000047048066,0.0000015915971,0.000018541981,0.00063866365,0.00007229881,0.00004851196,0.78739244,0.21171139,0.000003835678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026607711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00499312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020525573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036380826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022158257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06866491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093435547","doi":"10.1177/0090591707307326","title":"The Force of Ideas in Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Epistemology; Transpersonal; Ideology; Power (physics); Falsity; Interpretation (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Vitality; Contemplation; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.026674866546227253,"score_gpt":0.39043934096806016,"score_spread":0.3637644744218329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093435547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049173843,0.006930559,0.08466851,0.029590284,0.001055446,0.000092689654,0.0000631845,0.00018398676,0.8282415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95895046,0.0013766893,0.012990228,0.0016056203,0.00030071678,0.00014669163,0.000023795517,0.000075665426,0.024530081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461824,0.0027385224,0.00020368144,0.00067701656,0.0011694975,0.0005930004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622464,0.002066426,0.0003379456,0.00047764945,0.0005280763,0.00036520674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066952636,0.0005326807,0.00054526597,0.0036194802,0.0105195325,0.012176231,0.00079081155,0.002593873,0.0048367395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069313613,0.0003945237,0.0007652292,0.001690112,0.054251183,0.012687286,0.006184359,0.004281281,0.0006950261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028522456,0.0000018867156,0.00003252889,0.000006741206,9.3645366e-7,0.000014823634,0.0013352822,0.00003127494,0.000019431465,0.99737966,0.00021773638,0.00095684396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012086095,0.000005710592,0.000055995708,0.000027422398,0.0000036998038,0.000036279507,0.00082439237,0.00020864318,0.000072742805,0.96660346,0.03214347,0.000006013019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032899242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012176231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077778636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044629066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056432664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093477573","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276974","title":"Book Review: Sovereign Nations, Carnal States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Sovereign state; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01227282060598202,"score_gpt":0.22082112793278114,"score_spread":0.2085483073267991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093477573","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015958429,0.82178235,0.00036150485,0.031699598,0.04419396,0.000028601466,0.0005387342,0.00006803139,0.10116762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030524433,0.66526246,0.00056273496,0.016944744,0.046963908,0.000090131696,0.00091974495,0.00014106873,0.26606277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00013400498,0.00004163,0.00010129322,0.00033614621,0.00004511027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976162,0.0011703585,0.00016442825,0.000095940246,0.00076891214,0.00018408173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000969964,0.0012345392,0.0018857752,0.0061399452,0.0014157365,0.004752039,0.0014880359,0.0034546594,0.08246722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004628716,0.0005724358,0.0005077861,0.017192785,0.0019533017,0.004677318,0.0014485904,0.0033096864,0.03205373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036750585,0.000005860027,0.00002434468,0.0003443067,0.0000029149007,0.0000069864573,0.000014758543,0.000050548373,0.000009187388,0.004150166,0.9771624,0.018224875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059332224,0.000003541676,0.00013655394,0.00056702766,0.000004860776,0.000034451845,0.000036480895,0.000018375751,0.000005545666,0.002091081,0.9970932,0.0000029534435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013811534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033248406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08246722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033043376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004435009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27588034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101567242","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366367","title":"Polybius’ Advice to the Imperial Republic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aristocracy (class); Constitution; Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Narrative; Classics; History; Political philosophy; Law; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02172936344141912,"score_gpt":0.3412937576863255,"score_spread":0.3195643942449064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101567242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021540828,0.025184158,0.005576308,0.10011614,0.0029215813,0.00003002277,0.00010019154,0.00007586208,0.844455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71374965,0.0089779245,0.0032185467,0.0139202885,0.0008461073,0.00007817802,0.000059311686,0.00012968226,0.25902033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.00053231296,0.000022887638,0.000112394955,0.00012945107,0.00008934139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944466,0.0003406008,0.000043799704,0.00004630576,0.0000763954,0.000048220678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008694664,0.00025640434,0.00023015337,0.00066587236,0.0047491738,0.0031756188,0.00038775508,0.001164352,0.007822947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022645786,0.00018796386,0.00010558089,0.0007091519,0.008446721,0.0019834898,0.0016549786,0.0032815041,0.0013537104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039436018,0.0000094249035,0.00033659962,0.00009372608,0.00000386663,0.00012623737,0.01957622,0.00007065288,0.00019485349,0.88557756,0.07525423,0.018717157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008210414,0.0000066051534,0.0006231333,0.00012236253,0.0000022064503,0.00010343329,0.0024261887,0.00010361633,0.00019714561,0.037928052,0.9584738,0.0000051838165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076373545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024393141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007822947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047157323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020535649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034215152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102591225","doi":"10.1177/0090591709345463","title":"Approaching Others: Aristotle on Friendship’s Possibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Democracy; Statement (logic); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0601659445881968,"score_gpt":0.2798299955626103,"score_spread":0.2196640509744135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102591225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0885062,0.011540363,0.03630635,0.033529893,0.00062503986,0.000034167097,0.000045733057,0.0000801891,0.829332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857664,0.0011519331,0.0019852924,0.0007284451,0.00020825648,0.000022898721,0.00001075671,0.000020908721,0.010105134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963082,0.0023649568,0.00006829336,0.00039163735,0.00050188537,0.00036502598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979067,0.0013139776,0.00016903332,0.0002076914,0.00017803014,0.00022453476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028695413,0.00043173935,0.0004672806,0.0014517959,0.01193617,0.0071237115,0.00065437314,0.0025133144,0.0027962376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031814973,0.00026673614,0.0005422816,0.0009215605,0.038186383,0.01048834,0.0045574354,0.0038253812,0.0005006104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041607077,0.000002660893,0.0000632708,0.0000051466745,0.0000014475761,0.00004204527,0.0064060017,0.000051976695,0.00001590609,0.99158657,0.0005310562,0.001289775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073366155,0.000011146555,0.00019969547,0.00003745192,0.0000040871273,0.00007105384,0.0045650043,0.00023898754,0.000052969317,0.9524964,0.042307872,0.000008006435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042748055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036832846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01193617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045192605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013720035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032789648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111299150","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265729","title":"The Force of Political Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Contradiction; Politics; Performative utterance; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Criticism; Aesthetics; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sincerity; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029103127340166606,"score_gpt":0.3490306364080441,"score_spread":0.3199275090678775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111299150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017136775,0.013436367,0.056397554,0.30656636,0.0046821823,0.00008887441,0.00009287065,0.00014428436,0.6014548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242658,0.0045955153,0.013007984,0.021135025,0.004603395,0.00036424253,0.00007442842,0.00022260733,0.0317309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751046,0.014900306,0.0006565288,0.0030793096,0.004923542,0.0013358293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95777357,0.03407736,0.001743219,0.002896099,0.0023746006,0.0011350808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029138565,0.00074768055,0.0010381261,0.0042266017,0.009439045,0.019362226,0.0018408246,0.008977106,0.00849091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05236853,0.00057878473,0.00087273505,0.0016965638,0.062399432,0.019704882,0.008134105,0.011060727,0.0016511854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003590859,0.0000032290668,0.000056965822,0.000019285675,0.0000035318012,0.000017705835,0.001183481,0.000034551816,0.000021465865,0.9953815,0.0018174878,0.0014573038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012044389,0.000004161846,0.000044390865,0.00008201542,0.0000026065213,0.000029825733,0.00065793516,0.00015651222,0.000052460335,0.9529621,0.04599207,0.0000037312384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010437593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073884387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029138565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006803332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056062154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15410131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114653917","doi":"10.1177/0090591704264467","title":"Expanding the Boundaries of Critical Theory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical theory; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03903002526766564,"score_gpt":0.41588377417609496,"score_spread":0.3768537489084293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114653917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017088028,0.08885465,0.16493402,0.3540372,0.0049036336,0.00009171731,0.00010338396,0.00018995935,0.36979732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.897938,0.027077215,0.04031841,0.015799789,0.008537344,0.00034925842,0.00005968518,0.00025210634,0.009668165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98089933,0.014717025,0.00035820584,0.0012154324,0.0022349104,0.0005751327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83802897,0.14737773,0.0021525193,0.0056188707,0.0046096444,0.0022123053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028067866,0.0012936821,0.002311755,0.008033458,0.00718315,0.013482913,0.0028120084,0.007679616,0.009941186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06394846,0.0007792977,0.0009430041,0.002937818,0.06650124,0.031038739,0.010167868,0.013938012,0.0008603574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004401987,0.0000063793054,0.000027381155,0.00003724767,0.0000030979263,0.000007400279,0.00045338323,0.0001482685,0.000010123126,0.9957848,0.0010363733,0.0024810855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003838676,0.000001718128,0.000018700053,0.00007786816,0.0000013971213,0.00000529091,0.00017613299,0.00036463735,0.000017591718,0.99188274,0.007447649,0.0000024102205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018469178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001575894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028067866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007985546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076897065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14843887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116645954","doi":"10.1177/0090591707310090","title":"Democratic Theory and Border Coercion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":645,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sovereignty; Naturalization; Coercion (linguistics); Legitimation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Discretion; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Popular sovereignty; Political economy; Sociology; Citizenship","score_opus":0.025066668869516966,"score_gpt":0.33919443280327044,"score_spread":0.31412776393375347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116645954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037612822,0.002939846,0.047571555,0.026754599,0.0005396957,0.000082350176,0.000078314624,0.00005553253,0.88436526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599513,0.0009792434,0.0035875647,0.0019758863,0.0004605797,0.00012200644,0.000035552115,0.000029215715,0.03285863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941473,0.002459659,0.00021852399,0.0010344028,0.0012368533,0.0009031442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945679,0.0029778257,0.0005075503,0.0009411588,0.0006526034,0.00035301215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052908715,0.0003147856,0.00056914444,0.0011035374,0.0050580017,0.0053390306,0.0010111671,0.0028355308,0.008974251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008076209,0.00025476096,0.0006058706,0.00079445937,0.028140336,0.0048266654,0.0042981165,0.0044526937,0.00066406745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013504571,0.0000022416502,0.000036050038,0.0000044332005,0.0000011684646,0.000011116118,0.00021007667,0.00010235771,0.0000130922945,0.99870455,0.0003525814,0.00056094734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008685843,0.0000033741633,0.00007895539,0.000018929966,0.000001889558,0.000016842312,0.0001409988,0.00032973118,0.000036240814,0.9887439,0.010617479,0.0000029109083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035294036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002720786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008974251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004852036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035789981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035204172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126637129","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332339","title":"Afghānī on Empire, Islam, and Civilization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Islam; Orthodoxy; Contradiction; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; Hegemony; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.021559168571035115,"score_gpt":0.31597144484992273,"score_spread":0.2944122762788876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126637129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2031006,0.07031733,0.0006552368,0.08104873,0.0007652312,0.000016349284,0.000029351408,0.000016545664,0.6440506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98349714,0.005948651,0.00011368252,0.0018037804,0.00029195767,0.0000059755644,0.000006197802,0.000004560212,0.008328019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938524,0.0003888126,0.000009152799,0.00003482325,0.00006317154,0.00011883472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999572,0.0002780868,0.000050077993,0.00002273802,0.000040129275,0.000037020258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007953645,0.00028819786,0.00022025894,0.0008860214,0.0072933915,0.0041346494,0.00031792346,0.001279073,0.0022179182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092071964,0.00008438944,0.00010642145,0.0010084929,0.022990799,0.0020554585,0.0019524214,0.0022009225,0.00014172115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016918972,0.000018172988,0.00061393186,0.0000237439,0.0000028641307,0.00017003156,0.04102827,0.000054658616,0.00011692396,0.9467006,0.00393735,0.0073164585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003035307,0.000052103413,0.0082605835,0.0003602834,0.000009469634,0.0003284572,0.06323883,0.0001898122,0.00027628918,0.45760673,0.4696283,0.000018847117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015367058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031349313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015367058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005132263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019541003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037237287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130704102","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485371","title":"Political Corruption and the Concept of Dependence in Republican Thought","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Dependency (UML); Law; Sociology; Political corruption; Law and economics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017843628132864667,"score_gpt":0.31190666728012134,"score_spread":0.2940630391472567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130704102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27940425,0.0064955675,0.034972556,0.04615694,0.0002246155,0.00003518399,0.00004515922,0.00005459807,0.63261116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996336,0.00045019886,0.0005788954,0.00047210118,0.00007846446,0.000014652711,0.000005251199,0.000007978142,0.002056418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637175,0.002559132,0.00008827624,0.0001864098,0.00042590412,0.00036855417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662364,0.0021304279,0.00046984784,0.00037918778,0.00019744589,0.0001994286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035314048,0.00016743293,0.00024943223,0.0016220176,0.0038970024,0.00536055,0.0005014672,0.0011712617,0.0011746824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049322974,0.00021851005,0.00027462767,0.0016369934,0.046013173,0.00610521,0.0043147737,0.0041428036,0.00012300127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043548953,0.000004806814,0.0002614943,0.0000037548637,9.451909e-7,0.000012679459,0.0020520657,0.000120362594,0.000023834236,0.9962513,0.00021282116,0.0010516786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014373569,0.000010851871,0.0010940133,0.000039286104,0.0000042389233,0.000053533502,0.0010545324,0.0009961096,0.00009730259,0.9801892,0.016437205,0.000009391637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031012031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002113836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054973736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054973736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023128947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039886475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133322118","doi":"10.1177/0090591704272278","title":"Book Review: Stretching “The Political”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02041720021970197,"score_gpt":0.2699473762028781,"score_spread":0.24953017598317614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133322118","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015001657,0.66801333,0.0005266333,0.09819343,0.18745618,0.000042209813,0.00029267606,0.00009796232,0.045227613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027391387,0.53834146,0.0007054656,0.0780218,0.17631486,0.00013445788,0.00050662906,0.00025234162,0.20298389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978703,0.00050904695,0.00013431266,0.00021254767,0.0011300219,0.0001436311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99020153,0.0044684066,0.0006882739,0.00034906683,0.0034998667,0.00079278264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024206145,0.0012008059,0.0023295747,0.008015349,0.0015470999,0.0061514936,0.0017809008,0.0049755634,0.0572763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010995153,0.0006409605,0.0006280015,0.012289968,0.002504329,0.0053363214,0.0019775943,0.005069581,0.030974288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004581374,0.000004148604,0.000012344714,0.0003410792,0.0000027622011,0.0000052292594,0.000012260696,0.000022390983,0.0000151959475,0.0011440875,0.97964853,0.018787378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005082147,0.00000578893,0.0001031378,0.00075340556,0.0000065888025,0.000028039167,0.000024464383,0.000012462042,0.000012186996,0.00091740664,0.9981275,0.0000037412983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076016015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026465714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0572763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048223753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006064132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19160837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134495749","doi":"10.1177/0090591714555577","title":"Shipwrecked Sovereignty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Sovereign immunity; Corporation; Political science; Indigenous; Constitution","score_opus":0.017904656941818947,"score_gpt":0.23422872761993235,"score_spread":0.2163240706781134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134495749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05320089,0.0022819934,0.010940076,0.013575354,0.00018808403,0.00002507689,0.000050616873,0.000039356786,0.9196984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93873227,0.000879558,0.0009339373,0.002642305,0.00012921767,0.00003269834,0.000049183345,0.000039127583,0.0565617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962219,0.0010246659,0.00016068859,0.0008493863,0.0008722714,0.0008710901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812096,0.0007684964,0.00020337365,0.0004249891,0.00033630338,0.00014591165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149748,0.00029839226,0.000425818,0.0009934623,0.007560793,0.011996285,0.00094709505,0.0037942883,0.0071115573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055595785,0.00027224908,0.0003908795,0.0011164737,0.03001537,0.007924514,0.008065531,0.00736911,0.0007530392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025542688,0.0000017162932,0.00011573749,0.0000051047955,0.0000015220415,0.00009071216,0.0024870913,0.00003845418,0.000035160563,0.994747,0.0010350939,0.001439869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014840813,0.000022769294,0.00074023794,0.00020348042,0.000017434564,0.00033522985,0.005504847,0.0006958589,0.0005439507,0.71861553,0.27328527,0.00002049863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008745992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008243576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011996285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005491506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039843857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137617981","doi":"10.1177/0090591713507934","title":"A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political culture; Political economy; Conversation; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Pragmatism; Social science; Epistemology; Economic system; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12364833206241839,"score_gpt":0.411159859143011,"score_spread":0.28751152708059263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137617981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015444947,0.008743099,0.119039506,0.32198167,0.0027176465,0.00019948983,0.00012552807,0.0000927422,0.53165525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008176,0.003173877,0.043197136,0.025518464,0.0029011061,0.0012742237,0.0001270916,0.00015068353,0.022839742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510993,0.039306242,0.0007006016,0.0030691095,0.0041482775,0.0016765657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624844,0.026634427,0.0011638826,0.0058923247,0.0022342613,0.0015906388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043843288,0.00067540404,0.0012838586,0.003294659,0.012617105,0.014153485,0.0023764644,0.008113845,0.0073581487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050087366,0.0005548407,0.0010006374,0.0026495557,0.07175936,0.023708105,0.0124019515,0.01366497,0.0010063349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015099835,0.0000034152818,0.000012917564,0.000005554657,0.0000010962016,0.000007814802,0.00046031858,0.000041870633,0.000004479155,0.9982679,0.00054678804,0.00064629415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006299142,0.000002443569,0.000017770217,0.000023302373,0.0000013022005,0.000013389763,0.0003387166,0.00013863004,0.000014925697,0.9778414,0.02159963,0.0000021718306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023004636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016090017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043843288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009887508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007893074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23186821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02734212584362437,"score_gpt":0.34691117675757527,"score_spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141496769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04150551,0.005554258,0.030743234,0.044379268,0.00030353846,0.000037482947,0.00007615475,0.00003900696,0.8773614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96929115,0.0014115297,0.004271095,0.004381147,0.00026456104,0.000069460766,0.0000384612,0.0000329219,0.020239556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946709,0.0027489983,0.00015281033,0.0008852633,0.0008068455,0.0007350308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714905,0.0014616798,0.0003021029,0.0004896918,0.00029400998,0.00030356253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006231321,0.00028207817,0.0004983546,0.0010728438,0.0044284286,0.006033768,0.0007735987,0.0039672977,0.0068113306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035371517,0.00019247069,0.0004862325,0.0010886266,0.05051157,0.007254504,0.0051287604,0.004032784,0.00050268974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016481521,0.0000026340786,0.00005519955,0.0000036218757,0.0000012653486,0.00000775194,0.00021411621,0.00008682452,0.000013911066,0.99861836,0.0003093399,0.0006853633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006380913,0.0000046860664,0.00020306959,0.000020285424,0.0000018656264,0.000018124441,0.00026571233,0.00018105359,0.000029296745,0.9847941,0.014472442,0.0000030963201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059307544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069671366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068113306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041205175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003701493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032954752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141674088","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451722","title":"Isaiah Berlin as Essayist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Rhetorical question; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Rhetoric; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.0656464873582708,"score_gpt":0.39344186963205613,"score_spread":0.32779538227378535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141674088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021214845,0.069885515,0.008177386,0.36676767,0.031393114,0.000035000186,0.00015027323,0.0001544867,0.50222176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5419872,0.03754048,0.0051991674,0.05503286,0.013307913,0.00017885599,0.00015289904,0.00023031484,0.3463703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984451,0.00062023866,0.000057788973,0.0002234578,0.00051662925,0.00013666165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.0012631327,0.00015977485,0.00009242827,0.00030451614,0.00020541887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017637258,0.00038352498,0.0003480945,0.0014157993,0.0028507023,0.007737808,0.0004235596,0.0026918945,0.005228023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075746165,0.00020754602,0.00019429372,0.00091120094,0.0058976323,0.004663252,0.002168287,0.0046013184,0.0015526215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020944944,0.000034032586,0.00040197765,0.00012205404,0.000005290073,0.00010284795,0.004228954,0.00015674919,0.00033793307,0.75438464,0.21363986,0.026564684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005741349,0.000010669691,0.00050223956,0.00024680287,0.0000052046107,0.000096844626,0.0013743574,0.00020094383,0.00023005696,0.10309365,0.89422077,0.0000127229405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008764359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012967137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007737808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022705854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013362844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017489433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147169714","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265931","title":"Brothers and Others","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Narrative; Racism; State (computer science); Rivalry; Sociology; Relation (database); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020003495919882295,"score_gpt":0.3299957686529255,"score_spread":0.3099922727330432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147169714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02170166,0.014757772,0.0015061534,0.13973519,0.025617108,0.00010582252,0.00022715845,0.00015747326,0.79619163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07483103,0.0031986404,0.00048065867,0.024243347,0.0013197041,0.00004792292,0.00008302923,0.00007774741,0.8957179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980363,0.00065188494,0.00005159938,0.00030008418,0.0006088231,0.00035125262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981989,0.00020256259,0.00011145529,0.00013822135,0.00059340725,0.0007554222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016229021,0.000590503,0.00036717436,0.0009044144,0.013298455,0.006019831,0.0007430561,0.0020154899,0.071324125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054066847,0.00027736853,0.00024934995,0.00064067316,0.002799184,0.004560359,0.004807338,0.005143543,0.017749853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033956057,0.000052384483,0.0011910369,0.000046843987,0.000008387787,0.00048410645,0.027677482,0.00004316524,0.00037308643,0.16340949,0.7598776,0.046802532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016159745,0.0000054002376,0.00021599067,0.00003091229,9.0501106e-7,0.00010126186,0.005129252,0.000013489495,0.00004622944,0.0015517493,0.99289846,0.000004640031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01440254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026182018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071324125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037901106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024684856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.238603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148598833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299951","title":"Platonic Reflections on the Aesthetic Dimensions of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Shame; Virtue; Dialogical self; Democracy; Deliberation; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Communicative action; Transformative learning; Sociology; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.08464911667457438,"score_gpt":0.41384547338502564,"score_spread":0.3291963567104513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148598833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057079226,0.0061702416,0.04144622,0.12656036,0.0015082755,0.000032599724,0.00002728182,0.00008292683,0.7670928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98156035,0.0009778504,0.0029054584,0.003643886,0.00043481245,0.000043819615,0.0000059019494,0.000043302538,0.010384608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992636,0.005298351,0.00009171472,0.0002560182,0.0011900247,0.00052782707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968923,0.0022534146,0.00023398084,0.00023305307,0.00019839715,0.0001889533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049407906,0.00048357286,0.000262815,0.00080718513,0.0054981196,0.0071881064,0.00072519475,0.002351824,0.0030324848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006968239,0.00023620583,0.00038244098,0.0006970323,0.05825921,0.0069597308,0.004333178,0.0074803117,0.00044368688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065760432,0.000004528471,0.00003497722,0.0000120499135,0.0000011297634,0.000021235017,0.009064254,0.00012929081,0.00006673619,0.9880916,0.0010922811,0.0014754467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052960436,0.0000059695003,0.0001001132,0.000038865273,0.0000016237783,0.000031955282,0.004785884,0.0002778555,0.00010507764,0.9596215,0.035021245,0.0000047271974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093342486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010158892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071881064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040163887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017376521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029141068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154796128","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329668","title":"Not So Novus an Ordo","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Polity; Social contract; Law and economics; Politics; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.12402404434066001,"score_gpt":0.3829714428445114,"score_spread":0.2589473985038514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154796128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039981403,0.017608246,0.00891526,0.52768314,0.02360491,0.000031307954,0.00029914215,0.00030845613,0.41755137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2191312,0.02139513,0.012586518,0.2159882,0.01703037,0.00015414067,0.0005284726,0.0006714855,0.51251453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604887,0.0015159848,0.00014545981,0.00077351066,0.0011651777,0.00035098247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953473,0.0014194621,0.00026715326,0.0010148988,0.0011253308,0.0008257429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490963,0.00062610046,0.00059781433,0.0011402023,0.00582257,0.009624108,0.0014220244,0.0042357952,0.03211167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014426778,0.00028247377,0.00048109936,0.0010841762,0.0136156855,0.010409237,0.0044936095,0.009648189,0.015495062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022973725,0.00002366387,0.0003821753,0.0000776625,0.000011017763,0.000066562454,0.0013184721,0.00008808359,0.000116702584,0.742044,0.227778,0.028070774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044595013,0.000008376762,0.00016010646,0.00017252844,0.000003628122,0.00007664568,0.0009712068,0.000096558615,0.0000791656,0.11756682,0.88084984,0.000010576018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005075544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008847748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035778028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040588905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10742426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158248433","doi":"10.1177/0090591709359593","title":"Theocracy and Autonomy in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Theocracy; Obedience; Judaism; Islam; Autonomy; Law; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Philosophy; Torah; Power (physics); Divine law; Religious law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019013598464196507,"score_gpt":0.2378588496994711,"score_spread":0.2188452512352746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158248433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2703173,0.023523634,0.008612746,0.033827256,0.00045523286,0.000029806266,0.000050081468,0.00003477999,0.6631492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066836,0.0012646676,0.000892121,0.0013004596,0.00019082811,0.000010189828,0.0000081265425,0.0000048147344,0.005660371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.00049863796,0.00003037131,0.0001351024,0.00022625331,0.0001334836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945813,0.0002770588,0.00006152369,0.000052976735,0.00006012951,0.00009014404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017843805,0.00015892192,0.00018183354,0.0005849431,0.0027900934,0.002876542,0.000351352,0.0012177918,0.001364781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001191966,0.0001132224,0.000117923235,0.0004296907,0.032902606,0.0019541783,0.0020061007,0.0019752646,0.00014823228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008143259,0.000008559656,0.0002454961,0.000010540089,0.0000017363315,0.000017730083,0.004932097,0.00006227814,0.000047183556,0.99203706,0.00038051733,0.0022486362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002712945,0.000032003212,0.003315999,0.000068426765,0.0000044127914,0.00008265384,0.0023264126,0.000322253,0.00012776148,0.94425625,0.049426988,0.000009828475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048314133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004188582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048314133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024876464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014472172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01804918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163111576","doi":"10.1177/0090591703251146","title":"Heidegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Liberalism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018673369959709307,"score_gpt":0.30563676914137994,"score_spread":0.28696339918167063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163111576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056649946,0.008217622,0.044167645,0.0678261,0.0006165944,0.000045491684,0.00005946473,0.000068455105,0.8223487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426145,0.0021137274,0.0071859797,0.0051290956,0.00033131268,0.000102873215,0.00002039011,0.00003502703,0.04246716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965687,0.0019333813,0.00010270916,0.00035511912,0.0007199888,0.00032015372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970282,0.0018646432,0.00025771567,0.00030097333,0.00030405677,0.00024457386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034672488,0.000507774,0.00041172854,0.0017641297,0.005596643,0.005553684,0.0006699897,0.003023843,0.0020656716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044124085,0.0001850577,0.0003393505,0.0012732132,0.043727458,0.008149324,0.0037431014,0.0047025327,0.00037341684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016111283,0.0000017111292,0.000023608056,0.0000031995799,3.3365194e-7,0.0000058412693,0.0013159112,0.000020559759,0.000013128451,0.99778384,0.0003714782,0.0004589054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004681034,0.0000069001576,0.00013063646,0.000025596155,0.0000013159591,0.00004348944,0.0014107057,0.00014234638,0.00007665336,0.96505165,0.0331013,0.000004764268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003207329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037158802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005596643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055864668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028577908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040532768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168652425","doi":"10.1177/0090591714525172","title":"To Be a Courtier in the Islamic Republic of Iran","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Acquiescence; Politics; Opposition (politics); Law; Autocracy; Political science; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.035214986947815385,"score_gpt":0.3138513087489161,"score_spread":0.2786363218011007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168652425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14105973,0.0060922466,0.00092790613,0.098303,0.003936972,0.000079523794,0.000062977284,0.000085885236,0.7494518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91000634,0.0013661755,0.00063384493,0.013316454,0.0009115745,0.000015963635,0.000024952224,0.000030875624,0.073693804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987901,0.0003571807,0.000020916037,0.00011312614,0.00040768992,0.000310963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995653,0.00006846685,0.000059455197,0.00003287181,0.00012911817,0.00014477881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014417995,0.00022360134,0.00017739517,0.00038088244,0.009033102,0.004089635,0.00037775474,0.001327337,0.004862514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019143488,0.00014606188,0.00014415562,0.0004295343,0.0057063317,0.0013961105,0.0014774216,0.003409887,0.0010972746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090803405,0.000075548654,0.0040925336,0.00010784302,0.000014984455,0.0010996227,0.06186308,0.0001709772,0.0014448825,0.62941617,0.24137023,0.060253356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030075102,0.0000546508,0.00838311,0.00010768634,0.000008097607,0.00053610036,0.030274462,0.00018480618,0.00030915433,0.013670463,0.94641083,0.000030419927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027561957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05420021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027561957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003675436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039797705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054803073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170826547","doi":"10.1177/0090591713476050","title":"“Office Is a Thing Borrowed”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute monarchy; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Doctrine; Normative; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027208922250037692,"score_gpt":0.23019894450312958,"score_spread":0.2029900222530919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170826547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040312406,0.0014636457,0.009148759,0.014964865,0.00025544173,0.000026556178,0.000043332817,0.00004529903,0.93373966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670913,0.0008417258,0.0013231399,0.0028256492,0.00024971092,0.00004964667,0.000051062452,0.00008264827,0.12748505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786264,0.0009447545,0.000042728647,0.0003172655,0.00035541205,0.00047724997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928385,0.00033715373,0.00007821021,0.00007600069,0.00011534956,0.00010938558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013382458,0.00023621981,0.0002117464,0.0009281045,0.006732848,0.0050958158,0.0005146173,0.0015705596,0.0067597167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020165462,0.0001580272,0.00022454372,0.00087583816,0.015636103,0.0045133047,0.0026299036,0.002947624,0.0009933587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009056271,0.0000057371694,0.00018095327,0.000007805222,7.577698e-7,0.000051959658,0.006962383,0.000023119866,0.000038700917,0.9851575,0.004302506,0.0032596532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013118806,0.000029214498,0.0019169351,0.00010112454,0.000006027234,0.00014568114,0.009843372,0.00021876046,0.00045554613,0.21368445,0.77356744,0.000018307577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010219178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016983679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010219178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019943207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02878815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171918329","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329650","title":"Disability, Self Image, and Modern Political Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Personhood; Sociology; Opposition (politics); Political philosophy; Autonomy; Binary opposition; Identity (music); Self; Citizenship; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031160590587096047,"score_gpt":0.3471203260432779,"score_spread":0.3159597354561819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171918329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044949576,0.016267935,0.008743936,0.0539398,0.00055409555,0.00002409614,0.00003112161,0.000030213532,0.8754592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636001,0.004912368,0.0011443737,0.0027433631,0.0004892873,0.000040742594,0.00002219721,0.000017223585,0.027030371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985984,0.00078339095,0.000025704963,0.00011496206,0.00021426554,0.00026327427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990571,0.0005627727,0.000097486074,0.0000576587,0.000078695266,0.0001462372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016637604,0.00035368316,0.00028643897,0.0019765056,0.0041068895,0.005964,0.0006044933,0.0017855436,0.0040801894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016487044,0.000107905515,0.0001956971,0.0012391029,0.032846104,0.0037186686,0.0023234983,0.0026018585,0.00039747008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011413422,0.0000061764313,0.00006654636,0.000005829153,4.3469947e-7,0.0000116578,0.001269761,0.000049659295,0.0000055019673,0.99651587,0.00072952406,0.0013378786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006378998,0.0000067381175,0.00022028331,0.000045111803,0.0000011662886,0.000039347215,0.002320629,0.00022426007,0.00002847405,0.9415533,0.055550884,0.000003364164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003789691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029595443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005840672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018749981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042377234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312325109","doi":"10.1177/0090591713499725","title":"Book Review: <i>Foucault and the Politics of Hearing</i> by Lauri Siisiäinen","year":2013,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social and Educational Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01784340811788545,"score_gpt":0.32050982629203706,"score_spread":0.30266641817415163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312325109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007635892,0.63760865,0.00031848426,0.18231557,0.15582016,0.000024177936,0.00011690409,0.00004461505,0.023675058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031517462,0.42889023,0.00050274463,0.167527,0.23562546,0.00017845507,0.00024225097,0.00025988248,0.16362225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980293,0.00057214976,0.00009384382,0.00026007163,0.00091552903,0.00012908374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912211,0.006056846,0.000351331,0.00019287213,0.0017140119,0.00046377885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023004068,0.0014780303,0.0019991382,0.0038539812,0.0022020913,0.0051153162,0.00204155,0.006906428,0.023611614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119154705,0.00069197366,0.000718335,0.0041519357,0.0038312676,0.0050162924,0.002161572,0.009749284,0.0152373845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037272148,0.0000022145398,0.000007965226,0.00012932804,0.0000021538203,0.0000061487845,0.000022257076,0.000010893345,0.000008261549,0.0016972207,0.98867214,0.009437709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006637877,0.000005136589,0.00007970669,0.000608983,0.0000049443815,0.000072700546,0.00004088809,0.000015201935,0.000017374869,0.0020843688,0.9970573,0.000006610574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011013353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025444742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023611614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057636257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005260321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07898867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1285266877168514,"score_gpt":0.3874451090091326,"score_spread":0.25891842129228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323106053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009915745,0.01839279,0.030082233,0.17054024,0.0015777813,0.000029690149,0.00006255798,0.00002455993,0.76937443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788617,0.021658378,0.011204368,0.031055218,0.006062251,0.00023616808,0.00007434988,0.00007556222,0.050771933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972553,0.00646603,0.00018144124,0.0006506665,0.0021228327,0.00085346185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923523,0.005884773,0.00046759064,0.00033906088,0.0004705821,0.00048563228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008020552,0.00074746006,0.000698073,0.0032145358,0.0061278027,0.0099894395,0.0011696356,0.0075760256,0.0077578127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006240555,0.000358155,0.0005736399,0.0023808426,0.070908695,0.010705432,0.004578178,0.0088459,0.0007097506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.621907e-7,0.0000023850885,0.000009102766,0.000005438134,5.2587325e-7,0.0000064878764,0.00035412842,0.0000425987,0.0000074524746,0.9988558,0.00033399626,0.0003815283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004187049,0.0000052086016,0.00006053246,0.00006391417,0.0000013298276,0.000020067499,0.00058347953,0.000123315,0.00003212097,0.9543597,0.044742968,0.000003172261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003205686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029703318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099894395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007870363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040818662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057103753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326128374","doi":"10.1177/0090591715619337","title":"Book Review: <i>Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</i> , by Hartmut Rosa, translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06610963969518283,"score_gpt":0.35096713654489714,"score_spread":0.2848574968497143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326128374","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017490103,0.6580782,0.00085882994,0.17983316,0.112648845,0.00003082006,0.0005893221,0.000106506566,0.04767948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055238856,0.5354879,0.0010319706,0.08403158,0.13546966,0.00011771506,0.0008174115,0.00029786566,0.23722199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928975,0.000121755504,0.000032503747,0.00011108782,0.00039973028,0.000045020894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773335,0.0010958947,0.00017870271,0.00006149641,0.0007553933,0.00017521353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008025866,0.0010644753,0.0010815787,0.0030828277,0.0009258329,0.0033509522,0.0013123226,0.0028448906,0.03137327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053468556,0.00046160366,0.000489463,0.0048915176,0.0019424591,0.003732362,0.0013642586,0.004763243,0.017570568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029379632,0.0000016263517,0.000009196116,0.00017836735,0.0000027120457,0.0000035393005,0.000011900011,0.000023337048,0.00001543649,0.0030015907,0.98476404,0.011985313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052656956,0.0000039710467,0.00012328918,0.0003776823,0.000004905253,0.000042376498,0.000025884034,0.000026892683,0.000026469035,0.0031812289,0.9961761,0.000005897564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076369895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148233175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03137327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033333865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041312384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104954004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332935222","doi":"10.1177/0090591713492698","title":"Book Review: <i>In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible</i> by Michael Walzer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Hebrew Bible; Politics; Hebrew; Philosophy; Theology; Art; Religious studies; Political science; Classics; Biblical studies; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.014763618732343893,"score_gpt":0.24735614241757484,"score_spread":0.23259252368523095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332935222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018091526,0.6917671,0.00022202972,0.13961317,0.113322884,0.000025643072,0.00029953226,0.00006011293,0.054508578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051300894,0.49225616,0.00035709448,0.097474396,0.13773263,0.000105406936,0.00042071682,0.00020102835,0.2663225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912065,0.00021586209,0.000046614674,0.00010150276,0.00044321775,0.00007222755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970457,0.0015004305,0.00020754902,0.00009412634,0.00088143366,0.0002707969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010980823,0.00073705724,0.001441947,0.003493642,0.001836851,0.0049270974,0.0012603609,0.0034764213,0.042331126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005049425,0.00054236094,0.00041088104,0.0067913467,0.0023171569,0.003457333,0.0015426015,0.0046518412,0.018203309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028082384,0.0000019823729,0.0000095805135,0.00018903348,0.0000021698709,0.000004615027,0.00003008053,0.000010019182,0.000013974624,0.0011492736,0.9904483,0.0081380755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048263496,0.0000035380035,0.00012818053,0.0006348257,0.0000047127755,0.000027169212,0.000064711225,0.000009844091,0.000016324448,0.0010172372,0.9980837,0.0000050156623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011218084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038424406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042331126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038497895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045686634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14161175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335250233","doi":"10.1177/0090591710378977","title":"Animals and Interdependence: Reply to Dolgert","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.015375673471944842,"score_gpt":0.3665213307881342,"score_spread":0.35114565731618935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335250233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016334922,0.0041365563,0.00012008086,0.99133414,0.0036646284,0.000001576778,0.000020519681,0.0000048501624,0.0005542854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011229201,0.0061975312,0.0003217258,0.9577857,0.02175467,0.00002517884,0.000033680357,0.000030800667,0.0026214097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996454,0.0015367265,0.00022899179,0.00086258753,0.0006849859,0.00023264157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637637,0.029833846,0.0008374053,0.0009307641,0.003156648,0.0014776925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008051508,0.0010200536,0.0024673643,0.0013675262,0.0040284293,0.0062215338,0.0029464879,0.030542733,0.005864499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03476432,0.0006490184,0.0010187493,0.0023417661,0.012725373,0.010995661,0.0042328774,0.04016,0.0034519078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055278346,0.000025240253,0.00030852496,0.000120133496,0.000033880908,0.0001241593,0.00079081114,0.00012591598,0.000058359743,0.030910345,0.9622943,0.0051529612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018425363,0.000033253174,0.0015405834,0.0007649069,0.00006983248,0.00052235794,0.0042812414,0.0005948273,0.000281913,0.1539561,0.83761764,0.00015303596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009058731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008921847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030542733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039007657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031586841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042580962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335328045","doi":"10.1177/0090591716642496","title":"Catching Up with Wells: The Political Theory of H. G. Wells’s Science Fiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Politics; Faith; The Imaginary; Institution; Identity (music); Narrative; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Aesthetics; Literature; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art","score_opus":0.031932886003333126,"score_gpt":0.2504189024739024,"score_spread":0.21848601647056928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335328045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011273746,0.02841409,0.008795108,0.60999614,0.0041318075,0.000027661312,0.00006747084,0.0000560081,0.33723804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7813245,0.014911341,0.0032445942,0.094940566,0.00494096,0.00014800667,0.00003405806,0.00013083722,0.10032509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781764,0.0014090671,0.000027481437,0.0002020354,0.00036252965,0.00018119873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504673,0.004063741,0.00023747292,0.00014761167,0.0003010669,0.00020339951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024525565,0.00042200612,0.00031278812,0.0012353219,0.0077755013,0.0065229754,0.00075181486,0.0047075725,0.0038520868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007139341,0.00025440345,0.00024221807,0.00090802973,0.03606522,0.00771914,0.0016264227,0.0062123425,0.0005709991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003598073,0.0000037702157,0.0000215126,0.000010882017,6.7832406e-7,0.000035043264,0.0027023973,0.000054942466,0.000018392842,0.973544,0.022548191,0.0010566488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010814613,0.000009012151,0.00010620992,0.00014797246,0.000002635214,0.000067754874,0.0034559402,0.0003033697,0.00014234254,0.621854,0.37388656,0.000013408615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009918702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010170177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009918702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068548773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003258984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049735844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339594322","doi":"10.1177/0090591716640471","title":"Book Review: <i>Leo Strauss on the Borders of Judaism, Philosophy, and History</i> , by Jeffrey A. Bernstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Judaism; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.03154044214282961,"score_gpt":0.24574529758044317,"score_spread":0.21420485543761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339594322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107904256,0.72397095,0.0002878487,0.14582556,0.10208582,0.000020089454,0.00032872133,0.00005520279,0.027317846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028390451,0.6199612,0.00036935444,0.10193948,0.09579664,0.00007337848,0.00050341734,0.00015945538,0.17835806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900025,0.00017228577,0.000053553198,0.00014109591,0.000561088,0.00007172151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513227,0.0022299597,0.00026625223,0.000119597054,0.0018519007,0.00040006035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011736847,0.0009146154,0.0013594701,0.0028344241,0.0014010933,0.0046197856,0.0016116227,0.003244768,0.031406607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00807292,0.000484786,0.0004911974,0.004874152,0.0020021715,0.0040531675,0.0015319269,0.0052691987,0.023719884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024564429,0.0000010937804,0.000009270811,0.00013354355,0.0000014316053,0.0000034840518,0.00000976196,0.000011299013,0.000010726283,0.000835634,0.9918675,0.007113807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029905611,0.0000025738977,0.000092685776,0.0004707571,0.0000025540526,0.000032449992,0.00002397715,0.000010306043,0.000014320879,0.0010186762,0.99832433,0.0000043746372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013161145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032148942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031406607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039617755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065915077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105065584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2348057775","doi":"10.1177/0090591715625877","title":"For a Pragmatics of the Useless, or the Value of the Infrathin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Proposition; Value (mathematics); Expression (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Key (lock); Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Programming language; Computer security","score_opus":0.053136839623748496,"score_gpt":0.2780976724256777,"score_spread":0.2249608328019292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2348057775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013096283,0.01321359,0.08791058,0.33641914,0.0031383978,0.00007068317,0.0001495146,0.00013618966,0.54586565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8654612,0.003215386,0.02115802,0.04575027,0.002804701,0.00024078858,0.00008906697,0.0004053774,0.060875196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886225,0.0076424945,0.00027513976,0.0012113026,0.0016236553,0.0006249119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99077356,0.00628951,0.0005863586,0.0012033478,0.00075230433,0.0003948923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008895382,0.0006320275,0.0006447358,0.0014163763,0.0096932035,0.009944401,0.0013045432,0.007834949,0.0095437635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015188129,0.0004433089,0.0007635167,0.0013575442,0.070814006,0.02089804,0.004867639,0.01244463,0.0020865798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030978504,0.000002442053,0.000030303585,0.000011098452,0.0000013888548,0.0000135069895,0.0026829753,0.000013589902,0.00004051268,0.99369425,0.0025808099,0.00092592224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007754106,0.00001201401,0.00009828689,0.00010199461,0.0000043040714,0.00008552883,0.003908574,0.0000975569,0.00012930132,0.847249,0.14829136,0.000014297392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029960363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037535036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009944401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048798267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003101874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04704386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372909987","doi":"10.1177/0090591703253187","title":"“Words Cloth'd in Reason's Garb”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Art","score_opus":0.017672029352490872,"score_gpt":0.31797949797955105,"score_spread":0.3003074686270602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372909987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072447434,0.012716739,0.024372082,0.46730974,0.023783533,0.00004405019,0.00017582628,0.00029580458,0.46405742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47004893,0.004182902,0.010548095,0.18571086,0.010286912,0.00026309918,0.00013351464,0.0004796392,0.31834602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958912,0.0025021697,0.00017002018,0.00041830307,0.00067127607,0.00034700855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656147,0.0020046097,0.00022289675,0.00053761806,0.00046129312,0.00021207688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003855735,0.00077660265,0.000629806,0.0017734921,0.0058474154,0.008246387,0.0010832342,0.0079106325,0.0075651812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010367242,0.00040767065,0.0007194466,0.0013738791,0.040891763,0.008423868,0.0029685404,0.012851921,0.002126105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053578524,0.0000024869748,0.000028797805,0.000012735795,0.0000028250545,0.000010941908,0.0013553164,0.000024488678,0.000024870664,0.9678315,0.028933166,0.0017674703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009918107,0.000007630637,0.00013888234,0.000090949856,0.000008953447,0.000048173508,0.0016026484,0.00012548531,0.00013209283,0.6017408,0.3960775,0.000017055041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009239536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010928541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009239536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041304086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028572578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029968321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2443657003","doi":"10.1177/0090591716651109","title":"Responsibility as Responsiveness: Enacting a Dispositional Ethics of Encounter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Massey University","keywords":"Situated; Embodied cognition; Normative; Sociology; Active listening; Politics; Normative ethics; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05336935418280534,"score_gpt":0.39971338918640387,"score_spread":0.3463440350035985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2443657003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22262001,0.00071488204,0.19944528,0.050223533,0.0005475632,0.00030141763,0.000022160748,0.0002837037,0.5258415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873685,0.000104631064,0.0071558193,0.00092446647,0.000044706365,0.00011017705,0.000005242351,0.000045313438,0.0042410516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95560765,0.036270555,0.0007630645,0.0022604896,0.0032536387,0.0018446668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98130614,0.011732268,0.0017350301,0.002186883,0.001339703,0.0017000239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02019588,0.00042098935,0.00046872487,0.001105188,0.0082906615,0.012061942,0.0014050057,0.004243404,0.0022480204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023827568,0.00044292133,0.00057230843,0.00055483595,0.07716938,0.011427003,0.01283877,0.007133712,0.0005034423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017825454,0.00004651433,0.0013643119,0.00005990105,0.0000082087645,0.00035718054,0.24568194,0.0004059133,0.0013159915,0.73912376,0.0012767361,0.010341686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000311033,0.000099203346,0.0015766866,0.00026655046,0.000013044692,0.0006979202,0.20851661,0.0022250025,0.0017264197,0.7096083,0.075158335,0.000080797254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014640759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014733081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02019588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007234373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10680735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497174511","doi":"10.1177/0090591716661222","title":"Everyday Deeds: Enactive Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Silence; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0281936615050476,"score_gpt":0.3292949038784501,"score_spread":0.3011012423734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497174511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40317,0.0059811673,0.21427615,0.03340361,0.00059863453,0.00022316696,0.0001470652,0.00020882169,0.3419914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370897,0.00026661943,0.0039435495,0.00024003361,0.0000839257,0.0000777022,0.000018413275,0.000022352637,0.0016383715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98478544,0.011165866,0.00056059007,0.0012407991,0.0012967375,0.00095064886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622411,0.030388428,0.0027020178,0.0024712156,0.0010720107,0.0011251973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012585938,0.00048312824,0.00062597875,0.0025494497,0.00578429,0.0115347095,0.0013871368,0.0031777555,0.0031997305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028405977,0.00050124066,0.00071993144,0.0019729694,0.059561152,0.015993478,0.009783368,0.0035257682,0.0002456176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024967825,0.0000264751,0.0014533343,0.000059700124,0.000010354132,0.00015728376,0.042473126,0.0010235115,0.00015246065,0.9491042,0.00032866318,0.005186018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018116883,0.000029062176,0.0011489191,0.00009137004,0.000010855019,0.00014266389,0.018588684,0.003751701,0.0002732534,0.9652673,0.010650966,0.000026987485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020025554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013174033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012585938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00460498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002283444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06656158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518817499","doi":"10.1177/0090591716630745","title":"Book Review: <i>Forgotten Justice. The Forms of Justice in the History of Legal and Political Theory</i> , by Allan Beever","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012474257656425293,"score_gpt":0.28665668624811036,"score_spread":0.27418242859168507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518817499","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000641527,0.7223436,0.00026223835,0.14784737,0.10603228,0.000024786057,0.00025202226,0.000039729555,0.023133857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020101306,0.5973019,0.00049236295,0.17888229,0.10018476,0.00010494956,0.00037385302,0.00014151291,0.1205083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982613,0.00035158667,0.000100863064,0.00019125192,0.0009813333,0.0001136615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929739,0.0040102173,0.00042800148,0.0001676923,0.0019477188,0.0004724976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016301473,0.0011226154,0.001727087,0.0033567653,0.0017741346,0.006402723,0.0019970625,0.0057807397,0.023090674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955032,0.00068655936,0.00085304526,0.0054304423,0.0035986789,0.0052635856,0.0018587498,0.0091838995,0.014721149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025022453,0.000002706264,0.000011421495,0.00020637081,0.000002831613,0.0000056209533,0.000018929279,0.00000957357,0.000010439434,0.0018837822,0.9880981,0.009747653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004566264,0.0000038866715,0.000103029684,0.000971933,0.000006005139,0.000060240818,0.00003859481,0.000011931841,0.000016299813,0.0027182242,0.9960586,0.0000066788284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014522341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042552985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023090674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004876063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008491549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07724595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519147428","doi":"10.1177/0090591716663293","title":"Coherence, Consistency, Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.0629267514145857,"score_gpt":0.37243749525636266,"score_spread":0.30951074384177696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519147428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14219312,0.009592367,0.32325768,0.053643357,0.0010407246,0.00037877675,0.00076103647,0.00023920383,0.4688937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97042453,0.00077019987,0.022505214,0.00087406894,0.0004793896,0.00029782817,0.00020597794,0.00005383298,0.004388904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98256093,0.008866392,0.0014760629,0.003392205,0.002852048,0.0008524233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555743,0.02735308,0.003632281,0.008277601,0.004256501,0.0009063939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017522391,0.00043585635,0.0014603983,0.003314095,0.00405097,0.008789077,0.0012358256,0.002710214,0.006978412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047920167,0.0006307317,0.0010582347,0.0034156311,0.029549638,0.012024401,0.004160975,0.004245998,0.00072024576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144778005,0.000015211753,0.0005397048,0.00003782576,0.000017336353,0.000011834954,0.0007584534,0.00026888185,0.00006376895,0.9923739,0.000772794,0.0051257745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015336302,0.000008044063,0.00057555066,0.0000179395,0.000008006622,0.00002044549,0.00027869354,0.00033596085,0.000050875886,0.9959621,0.0027220268,0.000005045169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021485547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014462969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017522391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029874695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003714901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092668414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520497297","doi":"10.1177/0090591715627446","title":"Book Review: <i>The Structure of Pluralism: On the Authority of Associations</i> , by Victor Muñiz-Fraticelli","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01963110587418068,"score_gpt":0.31457624890436636,"score_spread":0.2949451430301857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520497297","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009152078,0.72744536,0.0003943746,0.15317269,0.09295443,0.000025085803,0.0002896943,0.00004201923,0.025584918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032750368,0.63180333,0.0006245393,0.10417505,0.13282506,0.00012252323,0.00052496145,0.00015214576,0.12649724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988513,0.00023140194,0.000055485536,0.00018549089,0.00059832324,0.000077998084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615604,0.002002411,0.0002245844,0.000096085016,0.0012816928,0.00023928052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011713203,0.0010382165,0.0015151319,0.0031587307,0.0012711188,0.004199559,0.001768851,0.0040528,0.02097213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073514055,0.00052769313,0.00057482946,0.006668486,0.002764693,0.0043146797,0.0015967132,0.005650422,0.011319052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002766809,0.0000021176083,0.000011101475,0.0001736485,0.000002779705,0.0000034414552,0.000009795018,0.000017069558,0.000008684405,0.0020091655,0.98849154,0.009267875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006022574,0.0000042484603,0.0001225646,0.0005555453,0.00000670153,0.00004031642,0.000027292077,0.000021945825,0.000015978767,0.0027818745,0.996412,0.000005494399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014307721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032390904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02097213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042801895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055544297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07015878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520880326","doi":"10.1177/0090591715596559","title":"The Critique of Possessive Individualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Private property; Possessive; Debt; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05021306714651034,"score_gpt":0.3791271739592444,"score_spread":0.32891410681273403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520880326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063260466,0.0071753585,0.026487406,0.1591981,0.00063905225,0.00001975059,0.000111746376,0.00007628802,0.74303186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718123,0.0017120286,0.0017920949,0.006061709,0.0009184306,0.000040093026,0.000023570485,0.00004794221,0.017591743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956845,0.0022456548,0.00008366164,0.00056631997,0.0009152676,0.00050457165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702793,0.0018494203,0.00027102797,0.00040836402,0.00028080877,0.00016244063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049786707,0.00036593905,0.00045339807,0.001236941,0.0050827563,0.0048094373,0.0010125455,0.0028962616,0.004075993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042383014,0.00021765793,0.0006341635,0.0011324454,0.048393,0.0054223845,0.0036485947,0.005411682,0.0005745137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014078564,0.0000013601953,0.000029331353,0.000003306635,8.642597e-7,0.000004257985,0.00039934466,0.000040775674,0.000006431812,0.9985838,0.00044613,0.00048308543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008335556,0.0000058838605,0.00014350333,0.000023376038,0.0000021677076,0.000022446007,0.00031773574,0.00015953493,0.000049934173,0.9650453,0.034218464,0.0000033635454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003665258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002623247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007464783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007464783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028666365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054161012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555043433","doi":"10.1177/0090591716677335","title":"Book Review: <i>Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political</i> , by Graham Harman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.015600589593219968,"score_gpt":0.31369666837104315,"score_spread":0.2980960787778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555043433","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006327482,0.45332277,0.00023475876,0.3226427,0.21136336,0.000021182508,0.00019375062,0.00006218243,0.012095975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023692697,0.32967344,0.0004325861,0.30670765,0.22270179,0.00010602176,0.0003337628,0.00024877008,0.13742664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977851,0.0004960734,0.0001265031,0.00027173402,0.0011456582,0.00017487338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924015,0.0032689646,0.00042205845,0.00023596393,0.0028738768,0.0007976203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030662215,0.0013007834,0.001965622,0.004377951,0.0021107711,0.0074015143,0.0025282225,0.0070793172,0.016608793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019489592,0.0007755894,0.0007248161,0.0052913087,0.0033608833,0.0059065847,0.0027013766,0.010472629,0.014726559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002608286,8.731749e-7,0.000005370184,0.00007225363,0.0000016096484,0.000004234615,0.0000066941207,0.000006831393,0.0000062814056,0.00053272856,0.9953778,0.0039828205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050011836,0.000002893795,0.000052525265,0.0002950237,0.0000045438555,0.00003418158,0.00001952197,0.000009566729,0.000014383347,0.0010406963,0.9985166,0.0000051189286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014938417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04039806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016608793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072920006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00833601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05556196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604478434","doi":"10.1177/0090591716688265","title":"Book Review: <i>Decolonizing Time: Work, Leisure, and Freedom</i> , by Nichole Marie Shippen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Work (physics); Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.01689201556127904,"score_gpt":0.3034673897689537,"score_spread":0.28657537420767465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604478434","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008813138,0.7714917,0.000245523,0.111015834,0.096289575,0.000016622607,0.00015967971,0.000034430595,0.020658486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018748818,0.67759895,0.00029150653,0.096781425,0.10140084,0.000075885226,0.00022732277,0.00010416044,0.12164509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.0001284167,0.000037827893,0.000096699856,0.00032259733,0.00004945959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971666,0.0015637442,0.00015558914,0.00006974886,0.0007926752,0.0002517494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052916,0.0010124544,0.0012638897,0.0024240965,0.0013770347,0.003758196,0.0013382528,0.0034966532,0.020974275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061844736,0.000459827,0.00044424695,0.0038313365,0.0023875376,0.0041152667,0.0016657597,0.006997507,0.009592961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037642822,0.0000025963725,0.000009079609,0.00018746486,0.000002281868,0.000004139928,0.000018000186,0.000015704863,0.0000127859375,0.0017207649,0.98649514,0.011528286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004717345,0.0000036241715,0.00009396671,0.00048662268,0.0000041808353,0.0000340455,0.000039072842,0.000009674694,0.000013492374,0.0012359433,0.9980704,0.0000043222954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012158814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034971755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020974275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033295345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004186796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07016593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750838938","doi":"10.1177/0090591717725302","title":"Book Review: <i>Unconditional Equality: Gandhi’s Religion of Resistance</i> , by Ajay Skaria","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Gender equality; Religious studies; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.02668240783604248,"score_gpt":0.26934815839067117,"score_spread":0.2426657505546287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750838938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028195628,0.6405499,0.00019822852,0.19525841,0.10184438,0.000016791977,0.000198443,0.000049867704,0.061602075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010077213,0.4482958,0.0003689348,0.14733754,0.11629534,0.000066279594,0.00033105048,0.0002143974,0.27701345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933654,0.00017164386,0.00003348941,0.00009630323,0.00029726946,0.0000648411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983552,0.0008985992,0.00010158869,0.00006687557,0.00043533763,0.00014226734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008879679,0.00075780984,0.00088822463,0.001997299,0.0018497619,0.003704058,0.0011412835,0.0026743577,0.022373568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00382148,0.00038673787,0.00029538939,0.0035068346,0.0033306123,0.0034782076,0.0016851231,0.0057123196,0.008583355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000301723,0.0000016413504,0.000014821318,0.00014855881,0.0000017046376,0.00000602239,0.000057877478,0.00001179625,0.000015554739,0.0042769355,0.985151,0.010311059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023503221,0.0000026492528,0.00014015101,0.00026298623,0.0000024679364,0.000043333905,0.00009129259,0.000008278626,0.000014279488,0.0011603773,0.9982681,0.0000036852823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015124107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042118568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022373568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003364386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043661115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07484698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765849185","doi":"10.1177/0090591717731109","title":"Book Review: <i>Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought</i> , by Robert S. Taylor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.010316364056990624,"score_gpt":0.30966449778460997,"score_spread":0.29934813372761937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765849185","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014208608,0.5388338,0.00027179805,0.32684803,0.107131444,0.000018801718,0.00027178097,0.00004369721,0.026438566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004458678,0.55572486,0.00036519478,0.12809211,0.17752981,0.00008344422,0.00042478312,0.00013575758,0.13318534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992741,0.00019214906,0.000036840163,0.00012274037,0.00031829323,0.00005595527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944014,0.0034796817,0.0002816147,0.00012018619,0.0013092491,0.0004078112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011553532,0.0009528147,0.0011352359,0.0019227217,0.001483007,0.0043463833,0.0014928011,0.0041752416,0.022449067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007306364,0.0005576225,0.0005019772,0.0030952664,0.0026266137,0.0046833646,0.001313059,0.007101369,0.012233632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022868023,0.0000017669809,0.000017288783,0.000069424335,0.0000018171015,0.0000031361658,0.000011655737,0.000014456799,0.000004839503,0.0014890154,0.99279404,0.005590268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008622797,0.000006090281,0.00031783397,0.0006509046,0.000005975321,0.000049894334,0.00006777403,0.00004097262,0.000021477406,0.004093084,0.99472815,0.000009282859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011522528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023734337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022449067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035991832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004349112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07509965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804291774","doi":"10.1177/0090591718776938","title":"Poor-Led Social Movements and Global Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Poverty; Social movement; Politics; Political science; Culture of poverty; Economic Justice; Sociology; CONTEST; Political economy; Power (physics); Development economics; Basic needs; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.016679471327525112,"score_gpt":0.2560716456888615,"score_spread":0.23939217436133636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804291774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07324165,0.002886798,0.015138422,0.10546051,0.00040497977,0.00007330723,0.000037515478,0.00006467588,0.80269223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714716,0.0010280879,0.0012759692,0.005550569,0.00016535741,0.000069999034,0.000014785503,0.000030775045,0.014717182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682754,0.0017919585,0.000055016233,0.00030160023,0.00031901302,0.0007047913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982121,0.00081122987,0.00031309124,0.0002068929,0.00015276174,0.00030390528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044437298,0.00039400975,0.00027571802,0.001779549,0.007729794,0.0064597675,0.0006234968,0.0028029454,0.00546474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029275543,0.00013948277,0.00040329405,0.0012667587,0.04784393,0.005178811,0.009189751,0.0038952888,0.00026856503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021591118,0.000005786619,0.00015302909,0.000008585688,0.0000018291582,0.00001930016,0.0032220264,0.00013185744,0.000020654594,0.994155,0.0007572261,0.0015225792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013522774,0.000018658526,0.00088346016,0.000066412234,0.0000053938898,0.000031465985,0.007932147,0.0002890999,0.000095631694,0.91205436,0.078602225,0.000007634271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032189297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054318225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007729794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059800097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035199649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043388247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808868027","doi":"10.1177/0090591718781821","title":"Book Review: <i>The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and Theories of the State from Hobbes to Smith</i> , by Paul Sagar","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008603850814158832,"score_gpt":0.29181624857519756,"score_spread":0.28321239776103874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808868027","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008897412,0.64157337,0.0003092271,0.14119291,0.19093543,0.000030225448,0.0004035238,0.000065527616,0.02540084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024606015,0.5071893,0.0004577122,0.1267988,0.20611455,0.00011589984,0.00063111656,0.00018642964,0.15604569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989095,0.0001948334,0.00006628924,0.00014055878,0.00060972513,0.00007917886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540776,0.0019876224,0.00027131886,0.00012375908,0.0018457257,0.00036384602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224537,0.0013536994,0.001974585,0.0038828515,0.0013018455,0.004524367,0.0018956854,0.004208714,0.028562961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007940695,0.00058232667,0.00076361716,0.0067066327,0.0022633916,0.0038071608,0.0016943032,0.006806229,0.021305604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022640315,0.0000016851977,0.000007887782,0.000119959484,0.000002338552,0.0000033681831,0.0000063539405,0.000010666492,0.0000073309793,0.00058973895,0.9923458,0.0069024246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048306047,0.0000049875775,0.000097458644,0.0005451415,0.0000064234805,0.00004854335,0.000022205508,0.000014739953,0.00001675522,0.0012391978,0.9979943,0.0000055082073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009838316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024565447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028562961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034725366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004993096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09555262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2872121524","doi":"10.1177/0090591718786471","title":"The Rhetoric of Self-Ownership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Rhetoric; Depiction; Sociology; Politics; Rhetorical question; Subversion; Invocation; Law and economics; Ambiguity; Individualism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056810154213223614,"score_gpt":0.2815420788844856,"score_spread":0.22473192467126202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2872121524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054079425,0.024389572,0.057258796,0.09210397,0.004083633,0.000046933576,0.000052429226,0.0002089274,0.76777625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698308,0.0035553353,0.0028076523,0.0038301528,0.0014864285,0.00004858149,0.000021020476,0.00011738062,0.018302502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991715,0.005858298,0.00018424733,0.00042602266,0.0013988029,0.00041767844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869942,0.010698262,0.0006512204,0.0005910578,0.0007946615,0.0002705918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00798245,0.0004695332,0.0004174234,0.0023213774,0.006471254,0.008219144,0.00094102585,0.0025536146,0.0037029034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015080077,0.00027605286,0.00029484803,0.0014941776,0.0369617,0.013655577,0.0049921228,0.0045692422,0.00069030694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070935953,0.0000028722227,0.00006456252,0.000040164585,0.0000015973251,0.00004384638,0.01523502,0.00004024184,0.00008708002,0.9784903,0.0021475162,0.0038396306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017242792,0.000039257568,0.0002117865,0.00060397526,0.000012882333,0.00030605393,0.013642917,0.00055096304,0.0010960207,0.63782626,0.3456751,0.000017613353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000836663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052904413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008219144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035663804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020578767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042215705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042393846","doi":"10.1177/0090591720943507","title":"Book Review: <i>Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration</i> , by Anna Stilz","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030166174887665154,"score_gpt":0.3182426056773699,"score_spread":0.28807643078970474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042393846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000095994044,0.82539093,0.00019959328,0.07408316,0.08097514,0.000020968257,0.00037813044,0.000032049396,0.01882411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018787698,0.7873247,0.00027472439,0.04388265,0.07299722,0.000095976015,0.0005184487,0.00009611139,0.09293134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993049,0.00011520303,0.000048117887,0.000108903245,0.00037083024,0.0000520397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664426,0.0017351679,0.00021748248,0.000077554345,0.001092136,0.00023339808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010686157,0.0011593137,0.0017930416,0.0040916726,0.0011629498,0.004530818,0.0013419772,0.0032997504,0.02724941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006372764,0.0005185659,0.0005793179,0.008005061,0.0017575903,0.0037492497,0.0015867423,0.00430781,0.013687952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003951758,0.000002550941,0.000013702017,0.0004087233,0.0000034323878,0.0000054867346,0.000010995441,0.000022787386,0.000017025934,0.0010694172,0.98628485,0.0121569075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005853243,0.0000058765886,0.00013860466,0.00085011305,0.000007632336,0.000051634124,0.00003053758,0.00001960863,0.000018892282,0.0011292523,0.9977373,0.000004758716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010365965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023000263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02724941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036705555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006137615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09115839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084410903","doi":"10.1177/0090591720952056","title":"Laughing with Leviathan: Hobbesian Laughter in Theory and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Rhetoric; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Adversary; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05017537227571865,"score_gpt":0.2822843875170103,"score_spread":0.23210901524129163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084410903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12511128,0.07294428,0.0663746,0.15724447,0.004338883,0.00011552839,0.000040780422,0.00025281316,0.5735774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685327,0.00866115,0.0056980248,0.0043374235,0.00061946124,0.000107729466,0.000016678665,0.00015314086,0.011873654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869158,0.011193133,0.0001917429,0.00058986695,0.0006722383,0.0004371794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809404,0.016186642,0.00046052734,0.000955169,0.0006942577,0.0007630145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129629215,0.00071791554,0.0007249059,0.0028162128,0.012017083,0.013769226,0.0015582696,0.004899411,0.004316335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680735,0.00055429206,0.00032823454,0.0018309986,0.06540171,0.01040012,0.0058209146,0.0058112503,0.0013261492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029605368,0.00004013238,0.00036666356,0.0001424428,0.000006836061,0.00022931132,0.2684663,0.00016903569,0.00018247524,0.7107435,0.0054185255,0.01420524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035021516,0.00008464225,0.000976815,0.0021952845,0.00001712393,0.00030467886,0.21579732,0.0012058013,0.0007656638,0.5202112,0.25835693,0.000049415055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041707535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004963604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013769226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007126066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037465203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068555295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088037499","doi":"10.1177/0090591720960438","title":"Lyons and Tygers and Wolves, Oh My! Human Equality and the “Dominion Covenant” in Locke’s <i>Two Treatises</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Covenant; Punishment (psychology); Power (physics); Humanity; Creatures; Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Natural (archaeology); History; Ecology","score_opus":0.03340030916116202,"score_gpt":0.3390903998550614,"score_spread":0.3056900906938994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088037499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028023845,0.036354523,0.0036278216,0.2063362,0.0020799881,0.00002487712,0.00004717671,0.000037911417,0.7234677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76480323,0.005525235,0.0009390007,0.03910763,0.0017929425,0.000073155774,0.000041968782,0.000055354958,0.1876614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762976,0.001284835,0.00003753769,0.00021736952,0.00039693576,0.00043344186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928755,0.000421328,0.00007194721,0.00006186671,0.00007055811,0.000086780514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012348972,0.00026625465,0.00020179071,0.000643947,0.0070891385,0.007701093,0.00052167557,0.0031004571,0.006889246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029125868,0.0001798386,0.00021772287,0.00062735006,0.01866053,0.0037358513,0.002286764,0.0043595294,0.0006662828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059378294,0.000006212167,0.00014803196,0.000010968708,0.00000205621,0.000036162048,0.0041811056,0.000023612582,0.000038116174,0.9675299,0.024605006,0.0034127894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009477957,0.000010397246,0.0008242307,0.00012066878,0.000004148344,0.00007293353,0.005511827,0.000046465917,0.00019016408,0.14211877,0.8510775,0.000013341966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01922948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030444615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01922948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003773156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022841382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03823507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110057919","doi":"10.1177/0090591720976568","title":"Book Review: <i>The Virtues of Violence: Democracy Against Disintegration in Modern France</i> , by Kevin Duong","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.010648732306368246,"score_gpt":0.29706374828069804,"score_spread":0.2864150159743298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110057919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012108757,0.7272843,0.00013560712,0.13704784,0.115164936,0.000017381928,0.0002644884,0.00002993294,0.019934386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045715147,0.6302269,0.00028070074,0.08945295,0.12917106,0.00010182762,0.00042260674,0.00011502161,0.14565745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918383,0.00020266889,0.000044392662,0.00013368437,0.0003623937,0.00007300026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969414,0.0017103647,0.0002094238,0.00006555944,0.00086068874,0.00021255526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096803636,0.0011321311,0.0015698958,0.0026682357,0.0014756907,0.0040490157,0.0011970755,0.0040346175,0.017696682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004974291,0.00044582845,0.00051580626,0.004261386,0.0018271619,0.002651266,0.001361168,0.0049558613,0.0076101357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032527716,0.0000017903482,0.000016920836,0.00018430536,0.000002902316,0.0000039735687,0.000013200223,0.000018654076,0.0000070767246,0.0011831336,0.98989713,0.008667686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006601469,0.0000072743414,0.0002626905,0.0006366272,0.0000071944014,0.000040157887,0.000052508647,0.000020835427,0.000015883896,0.0011644323,0.99778,0.000005772622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021396922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049576182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021396922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004459973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005872597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0592013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153860839","doi":"10.1177/00905917211008591","title":"Land Grabbing and the Perplexities of Territorial Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Land grabbing; Alienation; Democracy; Corporate governance; Political science; Land law; Political economy; Law; Land tenure; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.012607858700101343,"score_gpt":0.20584149080577238,"score_spread":0.19323363210567104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153860839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36206916,0.009424352,0.059182152,0.07052213,0.00031888948,0.00006769738,0.00006486434,0.00005521533,0.49829555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943604,0.00085333775,0.0012418899,0.0008156872,0.000054283646,0.000025193518,0.000012200008,0.000008805926,0.0026282046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472976,0.0030609716,0.00018904285,0.000804313,0.000566394,0.0006496177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631387,0.0019409822,0.00058242155,0.0005731055,0.00026173602,0.00032781155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061394973,0.0002440459,0.0004934533,0.0013378272,0.005743598,0.008738071,0.0008087649,0.0029422322,0.0026878398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047805505,0.00031184932,0.00039721103,0.001274225,0.10175167,0.013042973,0.01007452,0.005128179,0.00021043213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031486488,0.0000028360105,0.00025129062,0.000008338035,0.0000015201032,0.000030798627,0.0034784663,0.00015704999,0.000047891965,0.9948749,0.00021317467,0.00093055697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006944621,0.000009230562,0.00070630095,0.000041933417,0.0000030694523,0.00008474072,0.0044065197,0.00064666354,0.00007721228,0.9757907,0.018217826,0.000008979888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036600062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034990548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008738071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004809148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028082284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034892917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170568441","doi":"10.1177/00905917211020772","title":"Book Review: <i>On Borders: Territories, Legitimacy, and the Rights of Place</i> , by Paulina Ochoa Espejo","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008432661837847945,"score_gpt":0.3077365056950558,"score_spread":0.2993038438572078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170568441","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000101208636,0.8848614,0.00019300255,0.059135973,0.035955664,0.000011878873,0.00022111606,0.0000138598,0.019505871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002411477,0.8654647,0.00037871598,0.03493463,0.034726083,0.000047407986,0.0003084882,0.000043352138,0.06168514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994399,0.00012928912,0.00003824182,0.00010859539,0.00024224033,0.00004172742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681073,0.0021629855,0.00015533807,0.00006648998,0.00065856066,0.00014595056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009618601,0.0010296224,0.001614209,0.002709772,0.0011567688,0.0041344767,0.0013332558,0.0035098118,0.021208072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044896505,0.00046469693,0.0004539802,0.0075025316,0.0030951765,0.0044955127,0.0013941248,0.0045238277,0.006874695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000622432,0.0000048473757,0.000038050082,0.0006273174,0.0000063649595,0.000010999939,0.000054743705,0.000039922263,0.000022665341,0.0076053552,0.9664264,0.02515716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006549239,0.0000060194066,0.00033088168,0.0017217716,0.000009576186,0.00008050813,0.00012492244,0.000023078353,0.000021137976,0.0036617771,0.9940055,0.000008378322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019611752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047069393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021208072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029928659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005182635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070948064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170591943","doi":"10.1177/00905917211021796","title":"Martin Luther King Jr. on Democratic Propaganda, Shame, and Moral Transformation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Shame; Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; White (mutation); Political science; History","score_opus":0.039360600682068474,"score_gpt":0.2266899206312947,"score_spread":0.18732931994922622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170591943","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115535455,0.051482733,0.005501191,0.49091712,0.0031989166,0.00002843831,0.000050545088,0.00008887265,0.43717864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73237187,0.022216668,0.0025148958,0.09828061,0.0032099157,0.00012818819,0.000024947938,0.00013413395,0.14111882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699175,0.0017005393,0.000055098288,0.00023202114,0.0006503539,0.00037020267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979894,0.0013703868,0.00017131395,0.0001229312,0.00020625757,0.00013963768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025800157,0.0003594317,0.0002810238,0.0008251765,0.0059542125,0.0045899167,0.0005528498,0.005018042,0.0030691482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003677214,0.00021946571,0.0002865523,0.00056972593,0.023691446,0.004655483,0.002211502,0.0064511765,0.0010116975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005695838,0.000006681068,0.000068932895,0.000025673142,0.0000017590799,0.000029930738,0.0046262853,0.00007306773,0.000044785174,0.9516189,0.040343236,0.0031550168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011874491,0.000013528402,0.00047430384,0.00035306663,0.0000059323074,0.00008741929,0.0025909774,0.00019439234,0.0002638903,0.4240934,0.57189065,0.000020516616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102706235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00962939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102706235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063773617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034166086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046271145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176645292","doi":"10.1177/00905917211026704","title":"Book Review: <i>influx &amp; efflux: writing up with Walt Whitman</i> , by Jane Bennett","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Poetry Analysis and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Efflux; Philosophy; Art; History; Chemistry; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.015360669130286306,"score_gpt":0.2532700029687467,"score_spread":0.23790933383846039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176645292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023373915,0.33157024,0.0005531078,0.30945447,0.20249082,0.000089505425,0.0006156028,0.00029709304,0.15469547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017099406,0.08029991,0.00035452124,0.067709394,0.041838408,0.00008617532,0.00036642645,0.00032867966,0.8073066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878925,0.00016605204,0.000055414297,0.0001302618,0.00076054514,0.00009855781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961659,0.0012579546,0.00019946993,0.000121972014,0.0016082069,0.000646502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509218,0.0009251944,0.0012212319,0.0026405952,0.0026492593,0.006372701,0.0016040404,0.0038557006,0.09202073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00817931,0.0005935104,0.00048366137,0.0035240867,0.0014341719,0.0047222045,0.0021482653,0.005264981,0.058588292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012990765,0.0000011030208,0.0000045396655,0.000031977004,4.5383385e-7,0.000003227069,0.000008693176,0.0000033524605,0.000009262499,0.00023994697,0.99522877,0.0044674673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017246623,0.0000022681334,0.000055553744,0.000121920275,0.0000016076879,0.00001867582,0.00003887234,0.0000058024516,0.000018918865,0.00025783287,0.99947375,0.0000031545396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012490105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05292965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09202073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034962078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062490627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177088810","doi":"10.1177/00905917211027967","title":"Book Review: <i>Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism</i> , by Onur Ulas Ince","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian Economic and Social Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Colonialism; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.007693827330325186,"score_gpt":0.2020659153550596,"score_spread":0.1943720880247344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177088810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011510922,0.742956,0.00019756926,0.108856566,0.09549216,0.000026460912,0.0004894648,0.00006031634,0.051806368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026100539,0.5970896,0.0003407944,0.049562518,0.096884824,0.00007416434,0.00064587465,0.00014782744,0.2526443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919575,0.0001267002,0.00004102184,0.000116671494,0.00044728213,0.00007258281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960129,0.0017408009,0.00029535464,0.0001212378,0.0014266564,0.00040294701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009154445,0.0010680091,0.0013921831,0.0033897804,0.0011641164,0.0048509836,0.0013652329,0.003394118,0.03954521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005374778,0.0004957554,0.0004941273,0.0072926325,0.0016749741,0.0032705024,0.0014392909,0.004125334,0.020618567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020360085,0.0000017869078,0.000012268203,0.00012114023,0.0000013344652,0.0000033544165,0.0000066195307,0.000016661334,0.000007648205,0.00097649044,0.9906386,0.008212047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030842984,0.0000031873922,0.0001514022,0.0004716799,0.0000030933654,0.000026876587,0.000020166062,0.000018418707,0.000012619419,0.000956985,0.9983285,0.0000040100435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01895696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043223742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03954521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00426837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005767119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13229191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198419904","doi":"10.1177/00905917211039749","title":"Review Essay: Energopolitics, the Eurocene, and Critical Theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.019563029978124848,"score_gpt":0.3301861922969512,"score_spread":0.3106231623188263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198419904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009808565,0.46590337,0.0008132067,0.39228076,0.100597315,0.000010203116,0.00014527168,0.000014444755,0.039254587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061144464,0.52129793,0.00080277596,0.10756419,0.24763551,0.000070232556,0.0003168561,0.000088767134,0.0610793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848866,0.00067010324,0.00006803914,0.00028286042,0.00037814394,0.000112143236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101454,0.006928719,0.00041968652,0.00025001116,0.0011341369,0.00025290853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033250803,0.0009707526,0.0011514396,0.003650122,0.0019513217,0.0074364347,0.0015896737,0.008240255,0.020459756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011694122,0.00025893893,0.0005988631,0.0064208526,0.0076976647,0.008304709,0.0020817271,0.005147739,0.00319599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027915452,0.000024198771,0.00015264761,0.0012745644,0.000026201866,0.000053870826,0.000398073,0.0002792745,0.000072802744,0.24841511,0.7160847,0.033190653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022606268,0.000009403119,0.00051751203,0.0032281822,0.000020150928,0.00010647497,0.0011474418,0.00013411378,0.000057844176,0.118899144,0.875841,0.000016059961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002231995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034080707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020459756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035197006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043640267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06844467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216475987","doi":"10.1177/00905917211065064","title":"Settling Accounts at the End of History: A Nonideal Approach to State Apologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Governmentality; Individualism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03924193129292487,"score_gpt":0.3066311663187966,"score_spread":0.26738923502587175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216475987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05985849,0.0045417217,0.07855822,0.07123528,0.0010005266,0.000104557665,0.00008954034,0.00025294643,0.78435874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95516527,0.00082216755,0.0057691764,0.0029157961,0.00029259286,0.00005824614,0.00003565153,0.000121202655,0.034819886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000156,0.0053906557,0.0002770555,0.0010156459,0.0023148921,0.0010001716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114144,0.004594997,0.00048151807,0.0011952703,0.0019899404,0.00059685914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008569043,0.0004982392,0.00046282544,0.002574561,0.017860176,0.019826112,0.002220558,0.0057219635,0.004409713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01548012,0.0005133846,0.00043701747,0.0015662451,0.07850381,0.013833159,0.0066619315,0.008201249,0.00053400046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020539549,0.0000021210087,0.00006155498,0.0000045617157,7.8485624e-7,0.00002097173,0.0075142197,0.00005584312,0.000019281979,0.990448,0.0006360408,0.0012345723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008167046,0.000006572158,0.00020200328,0.00013040136,0.0000095945325,0.0000498146,0.0103242,0.0009569929,0.00022724623,0.87162966,0.11643103,0.000024387646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13484423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15697975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13484423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037688937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024842178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2734537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221078462","doi":"10.1177/00905917221076085","title":"Book Review: <i>Cinema Pessimism: A Political Theory of Representation and Reciprocity</i> , by Joshua Foa Dienstag","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Movie theater; Representation (politics); Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Art history; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026065499502657744,"score_gpt":0.2627089754513029,"score_spread":0.23664347594864515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221078462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002126063,0.6711068,0.00062809006,0.16750954,0.0878656,0.000037810463,0.00066374714,0.00008774034,0.07188809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057776985,0.55672646,0.00066902576,0.06619407,0.11079572,0.00012710251,0.00083767984,0.00027312548,0.2585991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992446,0.0001461315,0.000033414744,0.00013220578,0.0003890906,0.00005465677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550664,0.0023690609,0.00026511974,0.00012443676,0.0014269134,0.00030782478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090750644,0.0009827516,0.0012724184,0.0026923453,0.0011467859,0.00460971,0.0013592183,0.003367406,0.03772605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00685517,0.0004804083,0.00045553318,0.004925957,0.0014906063,0.0031110176,0.0011100317,0.0042709955,0.018596433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025328038,0.0000023332502,0.000015993955,0.00011173597,0.0000018654328,0.000002261964,0.0000082154465,0.000022322105,0.000009655286,0.0015667534,0.986204,0.012052206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053964623,0.000006180234,0.0002209512,0.0005234016,0.000006629253,0.000029888468,0.0000329661,0.000050895796,0.000026202531,0.0021294383,0.996962,0.0000060439475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014515805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033365585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03772605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037284188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039997003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12620622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248973662","doi":"10.1177/0090591709348193","title":"Citizens of the World","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495528448430352,"score_gpt":0.3629069642109506,"score_spread":0.3133541193679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248973662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033293493,0.0012786158,0.0036612682,0.041533895,0.0005493094,0.000042713116,0.00012092386,0.000036277124,0.9194835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7621306,0.0015097078,0.0012762815,0.009524733,0.0005708521,0.00009840077,0.00017638528,0.00005367415,0.22465935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979232,0.00091784314,0.000040877807,0.0003022818,0.0003912545,0.00042453426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.00046793232,0.0001403248,0.00029358457,0.00029827724,0.00041136477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867846,0.00024190324,0.00037990193,0.0006488356,0.0046862485,0.0072640157,0.00050135347,0.0023650257,0.021422103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004405562,0.00014052352,0.00024866714,0.000885526,0.006897349,0.0042055473,0.0022641248,0.0046368563,0.002175317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055998116,0.000017050737,0.00065963157,0.000010185696,0.000006517763,0.000037233498,0.0026750097,0.000054130007,0.00009703482,0.97926176,0.01144632,0.0057294676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008425149,0.000017782488,0.0014608831,0.000084147454,0.000015477728,0.000079750775,0.006660381,0.000283516,0.0002469776,0.47460267,0.5165255,0.000014501206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036280714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005210134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021422103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015026453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028400023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071664095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254528727","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030006007","title":"Books in Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Historical and modern epidemiology studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1293256818209135,"score_gpt":0.3812378370303886,"score_spread":0.2519121552094751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254528727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004456871,0.43572596,0.0013417639,0.01007506,0.02526458,0.0001482683,0.0023954045,0.0006143488,0.52398896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015181978,0.13701549,0.00091999274,0.0042469315,0.007546073,0.0001048286,0.0018064568,0.00027462177,0.84656733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914134,0.00009155851,0.00004980894,0.00013566682,0.0005119338,0.00006972549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982749,0.0004377789,0.00014254313,0.0001664814,0.0007142956,0.0002640488],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006845105,0.0015275867,0.002620849,0.0075296643,0.0013032467,0.0061347364,0.0015910737,0.0020847586,0.3804725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043163146,0.00069033616,0.0006382853,0.014875111,0.0010191017,0.004677738,0.0022885937,0.0022976669,0.36713418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014982445,0.00001796279,0.00005720138,0.0009520802,0.000008211316,0.000027991531,0.00004217954,0.000059044272,0.00012960062,0.0030546645,0.8545217,0.14111431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004543244,0.0000051622847,0.0001609847,0.00040109592,0.000005623576,0.00004983488,0.00002928178,0.000011902533,0.00002456024,0.0010455548,0.9982584,0.0000029702492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030923013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006876297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3804725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018988043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003728449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88368076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386569268","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193107","title":"Colonialism versus Imperialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Colonialism; Ideology; Decolonization; Opposition (politics); Cultural imperialism; Power (physics); History; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07211415653491443,"score_gpt":0.3796386410283284,"score_spread":0.30752448449341396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386569268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07999141,0.023948204,0.0073853806,0.087445475,0.0010337036,0.00002913053,0.000025946369,0.000025604253,0.80011517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692811,0.005181509,0.0009359685,0.0047979886,0.0007826681,0.000030033763,0.000011857584,0.000034600842,0.018944265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959925,0.0022258323,0.00013772471,0.00053117506,0.00061146304,0.0005013733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661714,0.0018435719,0.00043921877,0.0003497177,0.00035735895,0.0003930568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033805605,0.00028055636,0.00051433063,0.001152347,0.0050363503,0.0062859096,0.00075815077,0.0025006523,0.00324242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006253832,0.00018994421,0.00024305134,0.001312867,0.051158674,0.007011912,0.004304758,0.0037792176,0.0004003257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029439525,0.0000035908677,0.00023132593,0.000025378831,0.0000020513426,0.00002853337,0.006496578,0.000029207875,0.000028184062,0.99002445,0.0009366923,0.0021910493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015517946,0.00002776612,0.0021094112,0.00039873229,0.000009968359,0.00015796727,0.011551596,0.0003371135,0.00016769326,0.76785326,0.2173592,0.000011805746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007756149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070028543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007756149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00592578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032103688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042994678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386772732","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193106","title":"The Art of Not Being Sexed Quite So Much: A Feminist Reading of Roland Barthes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Yale University","keywords":"Queer; Gender studies; Neutrality; Sociology; Normative; Transformative learning; Scholarship; Queer theory; Transgender; Opposition (politics); Binary opposition; Shame; Doing gender; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06299201384365997,"score_gpt":0.37075470567013774,"score_spread":0.30776269182647775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386772732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045988847,0.05158908,0.0061391206,0.27843323,0.0042992756,0.000026433127,0.00012727773,0.000113689035,0.6132831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83765256,0.008392977,0.0013332508,0.02584851,0.0023374222,0.000062805455,0.000041367934,0.00016299181,0.12416811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970831,0.0019610038,0.000029273397,0.00022369633,0.00042760285,0.00027536304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987135,0.0008883261,0.000102236,0.00005481324,0.00014528976,0.00009586998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020806459,0.00058945623,0.00040189305,0.0007873639,0.00806832,0.0050223675,0.0008693069,0.0030085908,0.0034358124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029133335,0.00019819479,0.00021476076,0.00041572575,0.028610894,0.0038549495,0.0017129235,0.004032424,0.000655384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041125528,0.000017691798,0.00013193306,0.000059351027,0.0000038500834,0.0003101678,0.109515645,0.00010941484,0.00033238894,0.83762497,0.042321537,0.009531999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011092673,0.000041079413,0.0005284794,0.0003289015,0.0000063531934,0.00037437794,0.03730911,0.00013858525,0.00038830517,0.081718184,0.87912667,0.000028764138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034714032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026125649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034714032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001869639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06902397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388197903","doi":"10.1177/00905917231200828","title":"“Persons of the Sex are True Wonders”: Gabrielle Suchon on Difference and Political Wonders","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Closet; Politics; Deception; Sexual difference; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04651542337027485,"score_gpt":0.24974600306106093,"score_spread":0.20323057969078606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388197903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02477329,0.068656296,0.0022651588,0.58749384,0.0034229665,0.00001796309,0.00004539159,0.000030944575,0.31329423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74836373,0.028277574,0.0015171414,0.10292765,0.004018393,0.00008290853,0.00003573726,0.000115363815,0.114661455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997834,0.0014705794,0.000022682452,0.0001963058,0.00026455036,0.00021185676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832815,0.0012525028,0.00011853741,0.00006444633,0.00012438095,0.000111970905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021212567,0.0004449984,0.00037267696,0.00089155184,0.007561716,0.00582413,0.0006411032,0.00538726,0.0032528054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030052057,0.00020033601,0.00025125913,0.0007635691,0.02873026,0.0073813987,0.0024707078,0.0055145225,0.0006360557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013098867,0.000007672052,0.00012219779,0.0000258096,0.0000012960387,0.000082315346,0.014723951,0.00003006283,0.000042411324,0.94915146,0.033408355,0.0023913204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016042706,0.00001774198,0.00049886835,0.00036695515,0.000005517153,0.00021889826,0.014751589,0.00012763268,0.00013839317,0.4273727,0.55646086,0.000024863784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01364048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009127729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042076586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013845718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030528843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705131","doi":"10.1177/00905917231210995","title":"The Ambiguity of Betrayal: Contesting Myths of Heroic Resistance in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Betrayal; Ambiguity; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07029374130561054,"score_gpt":0.33371159697795144,"score_spread":0.2634178556723409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8714658,0.0034650909,0.005756541,0.03165724,0.00019165342,0.00005051849,0.000020880656,0.000019804336,0.08737238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852645,0.0003520094,0.00013856437,0.00019481702,0.000014510504,0.000008458956,0.000001604229,0.000007155755,0.0007563796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931867,0.005248473,0.00012510401,0.00029451036,0.0004939968,0.00065115327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906873,0.0072621265,0.0009833418,0.0003833055,0.00028169615,0.0004023274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010032932,0.00073659903,0.00061510684,0.0020572345,0.015326959,0.011317905,0.0010962292,0.0029437405,0.0024840746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014711593,0.0005448278,0.0003057626,0.0010687455,0.07241325,0.012785811,0.010381909,0.0062152958,0.00018630657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027714683,0.0000109130915,0.0005283461,0.000050041912,0.0000044849085,0.000445611,0.8287353,0.000087773115,0.00029766472,0.16770352,0.00032481956,0.0017837438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015123866,0.000046381665,0.0010470583,0.00031665206,0.000008452273,0.00057167164,0.89099324,0.00045782523,0.00057981256,0.07890385,0.02703451,0.000025413723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043318127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004289332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015326959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006417668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002631987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053059876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405090512","doi":"10.1177/00905917241291148","title":"Book Review: <i>No Other Planet: Utopian Visions for a Climate-Changed World</i> by Mathias Thaler","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Planet; Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Astrobiology; Philosophy; Anthropology; Astronomy","score_opus":0.019233942989801512,"score_gpt":0.33391169342588434,"score_spread":0.3146777504360828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405090512","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016749742,0.7100775,0.00055411324,0.09561353,0.103815176,0.000073429364,0.00059208594,0.00017414385,0.088932574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019959921,0.5812806,0.0006746516,0.048335623,0.05425258,0.00011197061,0.0007756777,0.00019436107,0.3123785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992035,0.00008748332,0.0000383748,0.0000968861,0.0005176311,0.000056070807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971206,0.0009546806,0.00019295886,0.00006885831,0.0013200287,0.00034293428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081742596,0.00082437607,0.0014390005,0.002080354,0.000916746,0.0041828854,0.0014260155,0.0026217392,0.0820445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048410287,0.00042311673,0.0005763867,0.0040946193,0.0010731688,0.0032321587,0.0012416514,0.0041510505,0.051099636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023826613,0.0000018872504,0.000008195411,0.00022528852,0.0000022369247,0.0000047370418,0.00000796711,0.00001305965,0.00002069051,0.00062712893,0.9845264,0.014560002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031436477,0.000004617493,0.00008857879,0.0005476155,0.0000034134548,0.00004668847,0.000019734804,0.00001157658,0.000016295231,0.0005450326,0.99870884,0.000004441616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012895775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0820445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023150183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034178086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27446616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408418245","doi":"10.1177/00905917251321287","title":"The “Recognition Trap”: Self-Constitution, Culture, and Mutual Recognition in Fanon’s Project of Freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Mutual recognition; Trap (plumbing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02978081949341823,"score_gpt":0.3104937600217614,"score_spread":0.28071294052834317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408418245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2203671,0.0089377295,0.018658008,0.1643643,0.0010968863,0.00008536757,0.000026762093,0.00005702618,0.58640677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631763,0.00036883255,0.00083291484,0.0023927789,0.000089190005,0.00003326481,0.0000036863107,0.000009257411,0.009952356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722207,0.0019479779,0.000038443468,0.00023058074,0.000265866,0.00029514488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988632,0.00078762876,0.000084031155,0.00008058702,0.00007195734,0.00011264135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048879446,0.00038598207,0.00031899582,0.0010375313,0.008369535,0.004679745,0.0007127747,0.0030522398,0.0019206429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030789215,0.0001605446,0.00022104452,0.0005934086,0.061716694,0.0058655776,0.0028262995,0.0034343335,0.00011799062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053235112,0.000004941987,0.00013553693,0.0000073257434,5.6279384e-7,0.00004281559,0.020544974,0.000036978647,0.00002999793,0.9754944,0.0015025904,0.002194551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025070733,0.000037666578,0.0009952886,0.00017762127,0.0000064425108,0.00031867932,0.023967648,0.0011437095,0.00039093642,0.8246494,0.14825611,0.00003142257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012636521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011693451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012636521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00976523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005355185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07085198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236420","doi":"10.1177/00905917251336722","title":"Book Review: <i>The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization</i> , by Kevin D. Pham The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization, by PhamKevin D.New York: Oxford University Press, 2024, 219 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Dignity; Decolonization; Vietnamese; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009550570406182618,"score_gpt":0.2775549958324187,"score_spread":0.2680044254262361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236420","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008247075,0.9032583,0.00012114453,0.048290685,0.034375068,0.000024417977,0.00030351203,0.000029907835,0.013514449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001467094,0.85913354,0.00022260733,0.029007887,0.024800383,0.00007687903,0.00067502965,0.000047275167,0.08456928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993185,0.00009905727,0.000054040745,0.000083369494,0.00038595352,0.000059017664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964043,0.0014425807,0.00027833506,0.000051699764,0.0015097831,0.00031334758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714886,0.0012357156,0.0017410201,0.00270962,0.0010079243,0.0032260905,0.002028611,0.0025956105,0.043098684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055046673,0.00051888253,0.0005671846,0.005795178,0.0013276094,0.0033989744,0.0011934908,0.004145289,0.020575276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004561781,0.00000305819,0.000020851594,0.0004999193,0.000003469444,0.000011338697,0.0000183209,0.000013670559,0.000014050217,0.00033530663,0.9792087,0.01986666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065652343,0.000010526783,0.00031071418,0.0015510948,0.000008392971,0.00014213653,0.00006633732,0.000016312784,0.00002483686,0.0003725062,0.9974819,0.000008629624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020867515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048931237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043098684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034159184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007031221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14417946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411796123","doi":"10.1177/00905917251350593","title":"Book Review: <i>The Greatest of All Plagues: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx</i> , by Williams, David Lay The Greatest of All Plagues: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx, by WilliamsDavid Lay, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024, 403 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economic history; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027055597993663926,"score_gpt":0.25643821643996995,"score_spread":0.22938261844630603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411796123","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012743162,0.85538864,0.00040112095,0.051285833,0.045920793,0.00002788624,0.0008986479,0.000066363886,0.045883365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021016775,0.7896008,0.0005072896,0.022338232,0.036620174,0.00008965686,0.0011642458,0.00013423683,0.1474437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.000096427204,0.000044887744,0.000118314776,0.00046028476,0.000058723814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968663,0.0013276561,0.000214109,0.00007385993,0.001279684,0.00023828409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007852393,0.0010296911,0.0016573423,0.002986467,0.0009305466,0.004323126,0.0014151738,0.0023181876,0.056551427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004892523,0.00048296203,0.000503607,0.007834448,0.0012428972,0.0031861512,0.0011617623,0.0038253758,0.03721998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036157046,0.0000034349812,0.000019936679,0.00026754854,0.0000031561287,0.0000043302966,0.000012451272,0.000030380474,0.000012872541,0.0013800012,0.97957224,0.018690025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043021437,0.000004913122,0.00020146057,0.0007025046,0.000004695114,0.000040298302,0.000021924543,0.00002011092,0.000015657562,0.0013084405,0.99766964,0.0000060448465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010825426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022898689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056551427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003272113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005438416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18918335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412166187","doi":"10.1177/00905917251351570","title":"Book Review: <i>Honor and Political Imagination</i> , by Smita A. Rahman Honor and Political Imagination, by RahmanSmita A.New York: Oxford University Press, 2024, 200pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.008940918037890147,"score_gpt":0.27241511120344686,"score_spread":0.2634741931655567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412166187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042370193,0.9577237,0.000069917216,0.016866107,0.01883782,0.0000080281325,0.000120560755,0.00001487274,0.006316622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011698868,0.9201637,0.00015745887,0.013483454,0.026068727,0.000042823907,0.00031821724,0.000031939624,0.038563892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943465,0.00012152489,0.000048900954,0.000079926846,0.0002584641,0.000056580004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721044,0.0014937134,0.00022012365,0.00004718927,0.0007834224,0.00024509005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007726784,0.0017247677,0.0019520834,0.0036451675,0.0010849744,0.0037700403,0.0017991686,0.0028898409,0.033690743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005225115,0.0006730186,0.00068591215,0.0064883647,0.0016873499,0.0036376663,0.0014218424,0.0043964274,0.020199617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008356895,0.0000051920324,0.00003241346,0.00060084235,0.000006628075,0.000013550343,0.00002190397,0.000020557693,0.000018384913,0.0007345793,0.9717388,0.026798777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009737416,0.000011397652,0.00047193348,0.0014746023,0.000012916193,0.00019990925,0.000066858476,0.000022334021,0.000024436826,0.0010740382,0.99662197,0.000009938497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011575661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027663996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033690743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029737118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042779567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11270678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414850396","doi":"10.1177/00905917251374863","title":"Book Review: <i>Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought</i> , by Temin, David Myer Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought, by TeminDavid Myer, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023, pp. 264","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Third world","score_opus":0.0055236777889120904,"score_gpt":0.2637016690894363,"score_spread":0.2581779913005242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414850396","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062524385,0.9291158,0.00008551948,0.033110738,0.027395338,0.000009675533,0.00014010548,0.000013968742,0.010066481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010513015,0.92429537,0.00015523973,0.016023709,0.024635006,0.000042413394,0.00021739434,0.000031394036,0.03354814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940825,0.00011397195,0.00004219207,0.00008649634,0.00030075127,0.000048380323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964116,0.0018947349,0.00024965068,0.000057152287,0.0011576395,0.00022913606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087086926,0.001061033,0.0015752591,0.0028325284,0.0011557125,0.003549049,0.0015117906,0.0026856102,0.027685186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046361852,0.00047172984,0.00047045024,0.0069493544,0.0019432517,0.0035797257,0.0013356673,0.0042603016,0.011606696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050426365,0.000004839403,0.000027098338,0.0007670745,0.000005332815,0.000008164612,0.000031197822,0.000024532821,0.000018378614,0.0013618425,0.97362345,0.02412308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007087969,0.000007751941,0.00031338388,0.0020131352,0.000009042742,0.00008053392,0.00007581367,0.000018964083,0.000019212877,0.001067289,0.99638003,0.000007810251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016781382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039566673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030364608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006143592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0926162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}