{"meta":{"query_hash":"ce7c0b976c56","filters":{"venue":"Political Theory"},"cohort_total":83,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":83,"exported":83,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ce7c0b976c56","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1966583833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707302196","title":"From Honor to Dignity and Back Again: Remarks on LaVaque-Manty's “Dueling for Equality”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Dignity; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09210073930510225,"score_gpt":0.4036069734791128,"score_spread":0.3115062341740105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966583833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06303197,0.000037913855,0.020977696,0.025328906,0.00046465793,0.00049688097,0.00020454287,0.00010600332,0.8893514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97826344,0.000004632877,0.0010479535,0.017337842,0.0023313006,0.000009303022,0.000008738239,0.000017620043,0.0009791505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974155,0.0004700555,0.00029369528,0.00035886475,0.00032382514,0.0011380899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98875934,0.009796041,0.000029696528,0.00023049275,0.00009944791,0.0010849877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004438701,0.00015365293,0.00024168495,0.00005929108,0.00045416647,0.000081257705,0.00022269788,0.00028178524,0.0001772038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071506705,0.00014262935,0.00009877634,0.00010204285,0.0007950723,0.00009913279,0.00008001354,0.0003344792,0.0002393186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018766968,0.000052995423,0.00005699914,0.000019822128,0.000014169228,0.0000027103704,0.00261168,3.39298e-7,0.000034510267,0.9955936,0.00016526057,0.0012602424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021839896,0.00008797599,0.00034406295,0.000051928368,0.000018707178,2.05409e-7,0.0018619519,0.000008510001,0.0006382461,0.97314864,0.023420408,0.00020093603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010251945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001538004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91523147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014560293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009541047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975290864","doi":"10.1177/0090591705274867","title":"Normativizing Hybridity/Neutralizing Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Essentialism; Identity (music); Orthodoxy; Politics; Sociology; Identity politics; Cultural identity; Epistemology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.04172689706387978,"score_gpt":0.3666921770762609,"score_spread":0.3249652800123811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975290864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0127806775,0.00017567471,0.0010886745,0.013050697,0.000219537,0.000113427195,0.000015835343,0.00021709327,0.9723384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894453,0.000013187448,0.00052562344,0.005708038,0.002595284,0.000007725952,0.0000030116576,0.000012482905,0.0016893194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775934,0.00076109363,0.00020143838,0.00018872057,0.00029460943,0.00079477805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841404,0.0008441664,0.000021151203,0.0001731875,0.00006216305,0.00048530078],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014570385,0.00012390365,0.00016099728,0.000041464245,0.00060316816,0.00008914405,0.0002641005,0.00011006403,0.0012241079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009829476,0.00011232892,0.00012970246,0.00013974187,0.0005890152,0.00035223336,0.000051042578,0.00029210548,0.0008141139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014147925,0.00005582346,0.000033875538,0.000008329108,0.000008381031,0.0000044213853,0.0030014948,9.3921636e-7,0.00006484322,0.993799,0.00035598635,0.0026527965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007767102,0.000011326045,0.000012185926,0.000014813085,0.000011216062,0.0000028392715,0.0015463074,0.0000059868867,0.0007659756,0.6993178,0.29811013,0.00012372299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003404591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007508811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97666466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003985613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977534503","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276383","title":"The Federal Structure of a Republic of Reasons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Classical liberalism; The Republic; Original position; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03677186889086934,"score_gpt":0.3475646313101299,"score_spread":0.3107927624192605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977534503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11599576,0.00022544814,0.00009950699,0.061187476,0.00017807976,0.00012865686,0.000071407376,0.000044214157,0.82206947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753845,0.00000921623,0.00013127824,0.0009936081,0.00056204555,0.0000011476884,8.423904e-7,0.000005543381,0.0007578833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.0005370988,0.00022561853,0.00009998315,0.00033203277,0.0005212731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700737,0.0023564815,0.000048927286,0.00021808015,0.00012639708,0.000242716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101224,0.00006455807,0.0001364759,0.000022402357,0.00035927512,0.000023451701,0.00029139497,0.00013560057,0.00020459657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004757919,0.00004346613,0.000096560136,0.00011081875,0.002545596,0.000082426894,0.00004719195,0.0002380326,0.000007848864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019082925,0.000026661188,0.00008314943,0.000007134377,0.000012469014,2.1338565e-7,0.0009243355,3.260055e-7,0.000057940448,0.9975817,0.00011233973,0.0011745981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007124367,0.000019625179,0.00071349536,0.0000099889185,0.000009229655,7.646568e-7,0.0010282957,0.0000036435877,0.0010317297,0.97919923,0.017862558,0.000050207705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031684185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014158523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051665065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022780447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9379355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987636686","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332336","title":"Rhetoric and the Public Sphere","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":560,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Democracy; Political science; Civil society; State (computer science); Sociology; Public administration; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03162158993094817,"score_gpt":0.3318990754674336,"score_spread":0.3002774855364854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987636686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053376835,0.00044830985,0.00028929507,0.09741288,0.00016051994,0.00011502447,0.00000258985,0.00007215463,0.89616156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077755,0.000024672117,0.000030984305,0.0070244255,0.00082216156,0.000004217115,4.4471614e-7,0.000004175567,0.0013113823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.00105508,0.000115771116,0.00013657335,0.00019670947,0.000504959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732953,0.0021237733,0.000011736602,0.0001569828,0.00003989834,0.0003380468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020789725,0.00007614369,0.00012796765,0.00001699474,0.0005332296,0.00011591497,0.00020379483,0.00007299143,0.0007245272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002250861,0.000048659967,0.0000695111,0.00013600734,0.0020226317,0.00011566205,0.0000277357,0.00017086454,0.000110278466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004716387,0.00002839563,0.000012670604,0.0000016390359,0.00000466178,0.0000025646489,0.0005592723,7.797236e-9,0.0000013657118,0.99373674,0.00008424535,0.0055212635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024825122,0.000019100054,0.00006416355,0.0000035697524,0.00001040707,0.000002615175,0.00085886335,0.0000021929086,0.0000058230976,0.892511,0.106206596,0.00006741752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016145168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026485077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98543984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002968082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003745223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79330647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000369785","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451715","title":"Global Justice, Historical Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Global justice; Sociology; Metaphysics; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0887236929548679,"score_gpt":0.38837986710509975,"score_spread":0.2996561741502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000369785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019882785,0.000484355,0.0029624286,0.015181151,0.002799489,0.000090381516,0.000023840676,0.00019606511,0.976274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810623,0.000012232328,0.0003239391,0.0086458605,0.0069667217,0.00000791666,0.0000018282618,0.000011563045,0.0029676515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641937,0.0008118367,0.00023421271,0.0001904576,0.0005411838,0.0018029195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597126,0.001955793,0.000028804792,0.00022730611,0.00009194727,0.0017248729],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020418179,0.0001448978,0.00019831717,0.00003141124,0.00066463155,0.000038517424,0.00031687145,0.0003013526,0.00054088846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070895934,0.00013644421,0.00012727732,0.00023480634,0.000964048,0.00028086355,0.00008479428,0.00033037094,0.0009609114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021751443,0.0001646582,0.00041420932,0.00003841189,0.00001041995,0.0000038251787,0.0007613884,1.6418318e-7,9.98443e-7,0.995694,0.002521924,0.0003682762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089531946,0.000016560016,0.000871252,0.000006768131,0.00022538421,0.0000034565153,0.0011350979,0.0000020668956,0.0000044864864,0.81633985,0.1811459,0.00015963765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056241854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013934564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014986555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021559683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005293593","doi":"10.1177/0090591704273537","title":"Robert Denoon Cumming (1916-2004)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.021386210039054984,"score_gpt":0.3168376441080261,"score_spread":0.2954514340689711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005293593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074230223,0.00052944606,0.0005392607,0.0024970854,0.00025903346,0.00010475399,0.0000047543354,0.00014794343,0.9884947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91259694,0.000007311431,0.00047054564,0.001520705,0.0021637962,0.0000062151908,0.0000022649895,0.000012611425,0.0832196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.00027826114,0.00014920038,0.00016911194,0.00024874785,0.00078569487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927324,0.00015467804,0.000026195647,0.00014532842,0.000042411288,0.0003581415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078832504,0.00009506303,0.00012304747,0.000042994205,0.0007092142,0.000042864925,0.00021815946,0.00013480644,0.0019954967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001860067,0.00008890554,0.00008597656,0.000085339576,0.0005647171,0.00015947156,0.000019221956,0.00017360495,0.0017766966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004412881,0.000040628733,0.00016271163,0.000002921052,0.000007915061,0.000004734464,0.011160526,0.0000010799056,0.000028860757,0.9767925,0.004586149,0.007207571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077240344,0.000010483616,0.0001804817,0.000008119008,0.00001755385,0.000002221645,0.0046115736,5.85641e-7,0.00019282215,0.14632435,0.8484311,0.00014347544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001280588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011523514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041282413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017182474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016158199","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299808","title":"Citizenship as Inherited Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Politics; Scrutiny; Citizenship; Realm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Analogy; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052380025567756144,"score_gpt":0.34489306100206124,"score_spread":0.29251303543430507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016158199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047334746,0.00012820862,0.00038672597,0.0039828965,0.00019622117,0.00009048155,0.0000025489721,0.000099010125,0.9477792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912039,0.000007762039,0.0000480676,0.0029492085,0.0007186381,0.0000042989395,7.622823e-7,0.0000039558404,0.005063398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879605,0.00014991543,0.000118012205,0.000116975745,0.00026191655,0.0005571119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910635,0.0004931213,0.0000130167155,0.0000601365,0.00008336829,0.00024402358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012780592,0.00006273432,0.00009143381,0.00002808503,0.0005487067,0.00002318782,0.000113875045,0.00006435575,0.00053552986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001698739,0.0000419999,0.00004944799,0.00014504684,0.0014740741,0.000034054763,0.000038899983,0.00009969616,0.0005241848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029884304,0.000019808278,0.0008510416,0.0000011634462,0.000013444291,0.000013629484,0.000497289,1.8679625e-8,0.00002579766,0.9958064,0.00035198315,0.0023895537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006843667,0.000015321299,0.0037379926,0.000008311329,0.000007552054,0.0000017537894,0.0032279047,1.5589127e-7,0.00009962053,0.9430555,0.04969665,0.00008078053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027521013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014594448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089171706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013236937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.673751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524797","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030001003","title":"Beyond Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08188175393542789,"score_gpt":0.35654160224484394,"score_spread":0.27465984830941603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022524797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028863256,0.00013333942,0.000116881565,0.031349055,0.00027493073,0.000060734368,0.000009334421,0.00013036797,0.965039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770048,0.000010944082,0.00006654148,0.011907233,0.0016572957,0.0000053650365,6.741452e-7,0.000009419285,0.009337688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804,0.00046955337,0.00013366545,0.00016038935,0.00031935785,0.00087702845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969007,0.0022219946,0.000013119128,0.00017520366,0.000048799397,0.0006402029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007816417,0.00008268354,0.0001120411,0.00003383288,0.00041385135,0.000044335124,0.00023814333,0.00016405461,0.004292591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038468745,0.00007745487,0.00008065805,0.00012028648,0.0014162525,0.00012903416,0.000038663962,0.0002997897,0.0019120155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017982792,0.000054260698,0.0000772647,0.00000429911,0.000005760581,0.0000035750497,0.00093170773,4.878255e-8,0.000003130811,0.9973165,0.0007668524,0.0008348025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074860356,0.000013255208,0.00016877086,0.0000044674266,0.000009553804,6.844661e-7,0.00033445295,0.000009128462,0.000031145828,0.89222974,0.10702513,0.00009879542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028138742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001987715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97411853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008523486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023998101","doi":"10.1177/0090591700028006008","title":"Review Essay on Thucydides","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04364299207181617,"score_gpt":0.37682449002257706,"score_spread":0.3331814979507609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023998101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022898437,0.0031100467,0.0000068753075,0.070363134,0.00007488302,0.00013570103,0.0000057932903,0.000111020854,0.9239027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8275987,0.008015933,0.00004440236,0.058642264,0.00081670604,0.00002735829,0.0000013983366,0.000014525409,0.104838744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983836,0.00052070833,0.00013894125,0.00016886825,0.0002523571,0.0005355333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983544,0.001224719,0.000012425075,0.00015708036,0.000030336832,0.00022105298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009636377,0.00008594259,0.0001867101,0.000014441294,0.00031727768,0.000022948323,0.00019094323,0.00004770253,0.007588532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017130094,0.000065305954,0.00010031345,0.00012147527,0.00087732566,0.000049890732,0.000027538757,0.00013357206,0.0024928171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007368799,0.000049057548,0.000017924072,0.00003686628,0.000007748349,0.000002406701,0.00024571337,2.4152142e-8,5.742039e-7,0.9470841,0.008833101,0.04371509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003173279,0.000017660626,0.0001396834,0.00024003697,0.000012388446,2.6518904e-7,0.00016450786,3.0079224e-7,0.000012795974,0.43260598,0.56670797,0.000066714005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008725955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004806178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060457107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027072966","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366387","title":"Book in Review: Rescuing Justice and Equality, by G. A. Cohen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. 448 pp. $45.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034820391461184284,"score_gpt":0.32706486561880294,"score_spread":0.29224447415761867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027072966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023413058,0.010078143,0.00012395215,0.02504801,0.00045684588,0.00034886133,0.0001980724,0.000110008594,0.9612948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90546834,0.016871076,0.00013488231,0.051577196,0.0011678466,0.000008143632,0.000020379244,0.000035728848,0.024716407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965968,0.0013019338,0.0002697304,0.00034612443,0.0004006477,0.0010847468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653447,0.0021778957,0.00004723935,0.00028743703,0.00009772763,0.00085524895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035061347,0.00016161548,0.00030326282,0.000033264663,0.000411864,0.000053358443,0.00036925828,0.00031158235,0.00030247512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004713901,0.00016515281,0.00007553616,0.00014164184,0.0021775027,0.0003339057,0.00018763864,0.0010272928,0.00008277719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025936313,0.00007482174,0.00006254707,0.00029243986,0.00000806288,0.000015652831,0.00021117232,2.8697643e-8,0.00002418287,0.94420975,0.054994218,0.00008118056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041867,0.000018246084,0.00021092188,0.00016017338,0.00007395791,0.0000020750324,0.0004385626,0.0000055053165,0.000046168578,0.20830706,0.79033065,0.00020247171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009370212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014852079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021484707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045498150","doi":"10.1177/0090591706286986","title":"The Unsettled and Unsettling Claims of Culture","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006093930751230042,"score_gpt":0.2674621643246079,"score_spread":0.26136823357337785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045498150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17247641,0.0012971457,0.0010755896,0.06988708,0.00045732816,0.00040105206,0.000033969365,0.00023457922,0.75413686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597263,0.000014331769,0.00010644964,0.00026347346,0.00024399946,0.0000014170228,0.0000018304925,0.000006897518,0.0033889434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991023,0.00025910253,0.00012480764,0.00008309529,0.00016356942,0.00026713562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908435,0.0006684468,0.000027277503,0.00008985609,0.000053057604,0.00007699746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005402198,0.000048224083,0.000069753056,0.000013590325,0.00043807027,0.000042595886,0.00011394986,0.00004972235,0.00008783819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031754686,0.000032573233,0.00002340233,0.00014690666,0.0009965117,0.000045553854,0.000019118977,0.00007353571,0.000012649007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036891245,0.00001033686,0.0008272458,0.0000026101818,0.0000037265586,4.351166e-7,0.00049391424,4.121337e-7,0.00008710534,0.99807894,0.0003706689,0.00012088823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000865713,0.0000058137757,0.0031945528,0.0000060079014,0.000010229009,7.349185e-7,0.0014782427,0.0000030623992,0.0007428646,0.9223634,0.07205748,0.000051055376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016561274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010160027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002410249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004104618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36716887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072658130","doi":"10.1177/0090591706295106","title":"Book Review: Political Obligations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05276057819546925,"score_gpt":0.40054184326514547,"score_spread":0.3477812650696762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072658130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057808043,0.015205544,0.0020849048,0.1316229,0.00027370386,0.00020949538,0.000020008674,0.00018838023,0.85033727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58499503,0.0006075839,0.00015353049,0.40330222,0.002039583,0.000012390186,0.000007647146,0.000021339049,0.008860649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961233,0.00059430755,0.0004023022,0.00025662687,0.0005992727,0.0020241821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941718,0.003597139,0.000030870466,0.00030593987,0.00017002528,0.0017242101],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041692136,0.00014735787,0.00024118404,0.000074857875,0.00055920496,0.00003776259,0.00033652547,0.00024372031,0.0031047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077462518,0.00013824768,0.00017940161,0.00025032109,0.0024261603,0.00020768458,0.0000674744,0.00052454916,0.0010423854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007710876,0.00006570028,0.000023657523,0.00006106478,0.000009674578,0.000011678416,0.00015623934,8.679107e-9,0.0000029780924,0.97599196,0.023485402,0.00018392892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052195588,0.000013217203,0.00013382718,0.000094358904,0.00002553171,0.0000024067454,0.00026340832,3.461621e-7,0.00007853643,0.5898042,0.40942177,0.00011023861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022808084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014202072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002805404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031042472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073087360","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340136","title":"Communicating Depth","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Intersubjectivity; Praxis; Epistemology; Existentialism; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06044201083906416,"score_gpt":0.36922536650107823,"score_spread":0.3087833556620141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073087360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03157088,0.00032312388,0.00045536598,0.0042470866,0.0001901254,0.000051974595,0.0000028583922,0.000117387746,0.9630412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889539,7.8184064e-7,0.00024421193,0.009518755,0.0002489814,0.000005410472,0.0000048185925,0.000007795522,0.0010153562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885267,0.00032292356,0.00014894924,0.00014763392,0.00005056053,0.00047723958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00029213508,0.000022610533,0.000493694,0.000014282066,0.0001439372],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029396024,0.00008478749,0.00012653915,0.00003694633,0.00010569842,0.000008124093,0.000288819,0.00009548729,0.00095780374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009047069,0.00007771456,0.00005946894,0.000054948046,0.00023735824,0.000030506451,0.000042005337,0.00025489312,0.0017528447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000562715,0.00013721813,0.00012091754,0.000001039021,0.000024786228,0.000008902003,0.0003084943,6.669729e-8,0.00006432655,0.9919595,0.00017356199,0.007144932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021951845,0.00010346925,0.010842364,0.0000038976527,0.000014192106,0.000020137271,0.00023075784,0.0000015461874,0.00004408851,0.98616356,0.0022670222,0.00008944928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008391441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1937643e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019348725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006836077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075443705","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485377","title":"Book Review: <i>Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought</i> : Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Eds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Contextualism; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0791029846245056,"score_gpt":0.338774500448251,"score_spread":0.2596715158237454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075443705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023263555,0.0865726,0.000015349095,0.15361395,0.0007224038,0.00106123,0.00014469695,0.0002247572,0.75531864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84750104,0.003935386,0.000090146816,0.14328822,0.0019819182,0.000110986504,0.000024056286,0.000074225965,0.0029940184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911588,0.0025713155,0.0010310969,0.00087356707,0.000968819,0.0033964403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869765,0.00592317,0.00009958903,0.00059472484,0.00027479517,0.004410086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022744867,0.00057143916,0.0010245522,0.00022770379,0.00041307355,0.00011917067,0.0005097988,0.0007290608,0.0012506986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005934205,0.0005553297,0.00022143453,0.00019432906,0.00808209,0.00076526357,0.00037378946,0.0013423485,0.0001829202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008593475,0.0001695036,0.00014039635,0.00038864496,0.000038908536,0.000055783185,0.0005439769,4.5199138e-9,0.0000062572826,0.9742618,0.024185386,0.00012337537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011477243,0.00017681265,0.00043200588,0.0004432588,0.00006745163,0.000016021293,0.001030527,0.000008067289,0.000013455351,0.74892014,0.24721932,0.00052521174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00824117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000480551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011458836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011832119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081728906","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340137","title":"The Radical Hobbes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03198801902196852,"score_gpt":0.2588037024958945,"score_spread":0.226815683473926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081728906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055532106,0.0007112628,0.00007594646,0.063659735,0.0007917322,0.00014286979,0.00003499212,0.00018567235,0.9288446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732623,0.000019671716,0.00001810867,0.013956184,0.0035939494,0.000007893538,0.000005760011,0.000013055902,0.009123089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980633,0.00025249698,0.00028202616,0.00021088835,0.00028606932,0.0009051636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979174,0.0012629842,0.00002365957,0.00030484828,0.000050201965,0.00044088296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041210628,0.0001759164,0.00018143431,0.000027079017,0.00067544193,0.0002044874,0.00034478467,0.00006174055,0.0022331183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041883838,0.00009812608,0.00019389772,0.000029112603,0.0015321516,0.00008864531,0.000042696603,0.00031873412,0.0008621337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005552877,0.00011508184,0.0000032814185,0.0000031309853,0.000017675922,0.0000072233925,0.00025054894,4.51921e-8,0.0000048428446,0.99207395,0.0021225552,0.0053461413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073542,0.00007193322,0.000070309296,0.00000679732,0.000013371073,0.0000042923043,0.00014761528,0.0000064807246,0.000057295096,0.57247674,0.426946,0.0000917922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008379515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019184233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96770906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035666904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022583698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093435547","doi":"10.1177/0090591707307326","title":"The Force of Ideas in Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Epistemology; Transpersonal; Ideology; Power (physics); Falsity; Interpretation (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Vitality; Contemplation; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.026674866546227253,"score_gpt":0.39043934096806016,"score_spread":0.3637644744218329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093435547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10305864,0.00030002126,0.00041406308,0.0047191954,0.00035039333,0.00009420556,0.0000018056347,0.00002431484,0.89103734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951751,0.000028806791,0.000036579433,0.00070190255,0.00019422808,0.0000013889589,2.1116021e-7,0.0000046345826,0.0038571074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863887,0.00026126465,0.00018638569,0.00008214366,0.00025519435,0.00057615177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692255,0.002723686,0.000025139874,0.00013198555,0.000052275307,0.00014436542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004879492,0.00004773978,0.00008406242,0.000029621402,0.00019443379,0.000015515427,0.00021910125,0.00010075641,0.00006554882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030781003,0.000033784643,0.00005112275,0.00012756695,0.0013148077,0.000043852622,0.000029501503,0.00018875141,0.00003759864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022454471,0.000017693066,0.0007895563,0.0000040055397,0.0000024712072,0.0000020652565,0.0036074263,1.4983681e-7,0.000014540764,0.9942287,0.00004511501,0.001265788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007405041,0.000014057936,0.004579862,0.000011451885,0.0000026997814,3.1692082e-7,0.011998168,0.000001904255,0.00024158663,0.95521986,0.027809579,0.000046450805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014335931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8921165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006105502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116784795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48444638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093477573","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276974","title":"Book Review: Sovereign Nations, Carnal States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Sovereign state; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01227282060598202,"score_gpt":0.22082112793278114,"score_spread":0.2085483073267991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093477573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039402767,0.0717828,0.00026717142,0.004335601,0.00024270648,0.00013321252,0.0001782611,0.0001250921,0.9228957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19753815,0.001096316,0.0000396881,0.12920858,0.002850319,0.00006627204,0.00023409844,0.000051694296,0.6689149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856454,0.0001467828,0.00034391313,0.00018851581,0.00022910637,0.0005271126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900967,0.0004634083,0.000036759287,0.00018329782,0.00010081221,0.00020608195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001886575,0.00015436862,0.00022817655,0.0000594984,0.00027594727,0.00005981494,0.00015154007,0.00003843065,0.013041304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012963661,0.00012142842,0.00014392259,0.000032816264,0.0004934947,0.00017291137,0.000033997057,0.00016805695,0.00072458497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052558985,0.00006359289,0.0000045154525,0.00009502009,0.00000822003,0.0000061873757,0.00005027484,2.4229996e-7,4.0557194e-7,0.7729896,0.22669627,0.00008042512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059626393,0.000019481578,0.000007183067,0.00005670092,0.000018907735,0.0000017842733,0.000047884936,0.000022793443,0.000003397912,0.45504245,0.54462016,0.00009959503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002874052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001992098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31794712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110722365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047439473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101567242","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366367","title":"Polybius’ Advice to the Imperial Republic","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aristocracy (class); Constitution; Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Narrative; Classics; History; Political philosophy; Law; Sociology; Literature; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02172936344141912,"score_gpt":0.3412937576863255,"score_spread":0.3195643942449064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101567242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19031921,0.000021011878,0.00007930862,0.29914233,0.001894354,0.00024141422,0.000014873613,0.00024092128,0.50804657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766451,0.0000015948535,0.00012337472,0.0067501348,0.0033477375,0.000023832243,5.1907966e-7,0.000009326139,0.0130983405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818796,0.00033696843,0.0001634723,0.00020665812,0.00035152846,0.0007533994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769413,0.0014811389,0.000020930027,0.00029527213,0.00009076394,0.0004177428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016379621,0.00009110113,0.00013688783,0.000030825813,0.0007472002,0.00012067475,0.0004861262,0.00009295094,0.001111468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009768966,0.000058523434,0.00008758431,0.0002261263,0.0010819056,0.00007741497,0.00023107037,0.0003262839,0.0006882685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015744841,0.000033813794,0.00013813854,0.0000011349821,0.000008489323,9.760246e-7,0.0032058507,1.530676e-8,0.00019655786,0.98399615,0.007403483,0.004999618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054593464,0.00001971033,0.001608185,0.0000019262645,0.000008769856,7.208784e-7,0.0029597073,0.0000016143335,0.00015965763,0.3290043,0.66609675,0.000084062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006027986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033384906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78632593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004016423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118427415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102591225","doi":"10.1177/0090591709345463","title":"Approaching Others: Aristotle on Friendship’s Possibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Democracy; Statement (logic); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0601659445881968,"score_gpt":0.2798299955626103,"score_spread":0.2196640509744135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102591225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231311,0.00008814061,0.00017664011,0.0077190674,0.00044335917,0.00016804328,0.00008248821,0.00022838435,0.9487808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812102,0.0000010742921,0.000061570514,0.014508139,0.0021648419,0.000007818952,0.000014955408,0.00002192695,0.0020095285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771625,0.00032686035,0.00033644153,0.00041364424,0.00031579658,0.00089102756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834514,0.00062259694,0.000038760347,0.00044082128,0.000044484324,0.0005081866],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005425347,0.00025390688,0.00028601085,0.00006738887,0.00032008704,0.00014334157,0.0002733066,0.00009574559,0.003920683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406115,0.0001861821,0.00023050317,0.00003660422,0.0005836314,0.00013257535,0.000036993784,0.00046858363,0.0008155303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244734,0.0005453518,0.000016312199,0.000012260928,0.00001830344,0.0000073233773,0.0010249551,4.261766e-7,0.0000063340362,0.99570084,0.00015028693,0.0023931472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559959,0.00026748274,0.00032486976,0.000028458135,0.000022832133,0.0000030980855,0.00054434396,0.000027540478,0.00013775389,0.93704647,0.061101526,0.00023961865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033306616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020451862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94677126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096065756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002268523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111299150","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265729","title":"The Force of Political Argument","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Contradiction; Politics; Performative utterance; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Criticism; Aesthetics; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sincerity; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029103127340166606,"score_gpt":0.3490306364080441,"score_spread":0.3199275090678775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111299150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021957802,0.00014605609,0.0017259162,0.032245938,0.00032068245,0.0001966948,0.000017932436,0.000068203844,0.94332075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690473,0.000007284925,0.00008486551,0.0016304636,0.000578182,0.000011441708,8.738089e-7,0.000009974681,0.0007721878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766237,0.0005373045,0.00026067038,0.00015634019,0.00038356968,0.0009997453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963044,0.0028023906,0.000023329176,0.00025789105,0.00008451402,0.00052748265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018074188,0.0000999935,0.00015542183,0.000025205949,0.0005745059,0.00004217682,0.00035742877,0.0000955953,0.00021234847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022817457,0.00006988893,0.0001520519,0.0001250693,0.0029772162,0.000071299146,0.0000660008,0.00018500921,0.00012164687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000470195,0.00008426869,0.00001988847,0.0000071385903,0.000013629995,0.0000029638422,0.0004185446,6.3607e-7,0.000040343948,0.999007,0.000008516641,0.00035007397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019385786,0.000056166948,0.000058633697,0.000017541624,0.000017860251,0.000001786787,0.0026269567,5.312205e-7,0.0019089401,0.98171777,0.013308308,0.00009162311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019171568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010288248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014731039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013508975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114653917","doi":"10.1177/0090591704264467","title":"Expanding the Boundaries of Critical Theory","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical theory; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03903002526766564,"score_gpt":0.41588377417609496,"score_spread":0.3768537489084293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114653917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14321378,0.0008510621,0.031803675,0.064609624,0.0015825127,0.00036344785,0.000053100404,0.00023869071,0.7572841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967271,0.000008231428,0.00028026325,0.002153263,0.0005214328,0.00001732151,0.0000010891215,0.000013927197,0.00027735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968452,0.0013976316,0.0002786103,0.00019487501,0.00038659415,0.0008971077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879887,0.0112924585,0.000025129057,0.0002684584,0.00013431172,0.00029094666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035348334,0.00011241923,0.00022450963,0.000035931625,0.0009956601,0.00009253521,0.00042629286,0.00018147654,0.00074779487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027058944,0.0000795553,0.00014327459,0.00014144923,0.02447345,0.00010827474,0.00010447571,0.00030609715,0.00007218505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029425913,0.00006955037,0.000043207787,0.000013644784,0.000011402539,0.0000054080433,0.012570075,3.0842352e-7,0.000062495135,0.9866209,0.00003134833,0.0005422066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013249626,0.000036463327,0.00018001777,0.000018173736,0.000033056545,0.0000034636464,0.040342007,1.8468775e-7,0.0007751012,0.9529612,0.005423581,0.000094271054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000525936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003746575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85351336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017784101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047466025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98113656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116645954","doi":"10.1177/0090591707310090","title":"Democratic Theory and Border Coercion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":645,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sovereignty; Naturalization; Coercion (linguistics); Legitimation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Discretion; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Popular sovereignty; Political economy; Sociology; Citizenship","score_opus":0.025066668869516966,"score_gpt":0.33919443280327044,"score_spread":0.31412776393375347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116645954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62343943,0.00024055783,0.0035684975,0.0018700034,0.00015003383,0.00015941757,0.0000030897222,0.00009269123,0.37047628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822373,0.000043732703,0.00007449758,0.0010568551,0.00025559688,0.0000050512317,0.0000017231423,0.000006489916,0.016318757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986259,0.0006692237,0.00010470068,0.000121823075,0.00015461133,0.00032377534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990662,0.0006107569,0.000015580628,0.000087324486,0.000036100846,0.0001840714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009424442,0.00006382056,0.000089095374,0.00003200914,0.00066333,0.000026066977,0.00006923592,0.00006505603,0.000989302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000475766,0.000047305206,0.000028776733,0.000049926486,0.0009754107,0.00013427663,0.000015730062,0.00008183842,0.000094322444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132807645,0.000020471876,0.00024978264,0.0000024431763,0.000004361438,0.0000036708154,0.004307262,3.302646e-8,0.000019089182,0.9940798,0.00030317553,0.000996606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009670003,0.00002228293,0.004143063,0.000005604613,0.000009269975,0.0000041505036,0.001916701,0.000006301467,0.000074740754,0.97858673,0.015052569,0.000081864964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012260758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062384104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35879788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033057157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007201588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126637129","doi":"10.1177/0090591709332339","title":"Afghānī on Empire, Islam, and Civilization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Islam; Orthodoxy; Contradiction; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; Interpretation (philosophy); Empire; Hegemony; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.021559168571035115,"score_gpt":0.31597144484992273,"score_spread":0.2944122762788876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126637129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03457198,0.00018053302,0.00012418491,0.004704463,0.00018038368,0.000068414905,0.000002747647,0.000056496978,0.9601108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901063,0.000056616205,0.000027335358,0.004122428,0.00034328862,0.0000017399086,8.6028666e-7,0.0000035478906,0.0053379214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999234,0.00013881674,0.000071973525,0.00011706949,0.00013836278,0.00029977752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995934,0.00021532332,0.000012581209,0.00007321782,0.000025462909,0.000080027305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036356036,0.000054243552,0.000080557176,0.00003099024,0.00036466014,0.000017240049,0.000056994002,0.000050342325,0.00017478885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031811272,0.000049186157,0.000022778067,0.000051493236,0.00036047236,0.00003658024,0.000010625583,0.00006209827,0.00006064266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066522657,0.0000223952,0.000034808418,0.000001540928,0.0000024150875,0.000001252063,0.0037142024,5.206888e-8,0.0000040533387,0.9883356,0.000978737,0.006898305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009999627,0.00006594462,0.005809847,0.000010843082,0.000007930301,3.3424539e-7,0.0030981414,0.0000037053246,0.000012397452,0.8947742,0.09603382,0.000082828796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088042856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061721286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078593606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031637093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2804708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130704102","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485371","title":"Political Corruption and the Concept of Dependence in Republican Thought","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Dependency (UML); Law; Sociology; Political corruption; Law and economics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017843628132864667,"score_gpt":0.31190666728012134,"score_spread":0.2940630391472567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130704102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063877895,0.00017121668,0.0009638212,0.015836202,0.00012221192,0.00031431625,0.000021004036,0.000030812684,0.91866255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956055,0.000005786072,0.00015131803,0.0025426906,0.00019832773,0.000022372364,0.0000014992534,0.0000042967927,0.0014681914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791896,0.00084396667,0.00023610743,0.00014125014,0.0002627997,0.0005968839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663746,0.002774037,0.000039426133,0.0001448597,0.00011202518,0.00029220083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010027183,0.00007644857,0.00018954958,0.000038963284,0.00015633545,0.000038640654,0.00018166109,0.00007499311,0.00059154886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023256687,0.0000531209,0.00005075321,0.00013213375,0.009055217,0.00014883166,0.00005701215,0.00016482797,0.000012882515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014622499,0.00002152844,0.0016360148,0.0000026282435,0.0000046260975,8.579441e-7,0.00033817787,1.5889091e-7,0.000003507121,0.9975073,0.000038184764,0.00043242754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003629006,0.000018653081,0.0051032505,0.000015705238,0.000011790989,0.000006085182,0.0069297026,0.000021578191,0.00005844801,0.97566706,0.011713762,0.00009109298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008408589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000897811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93172765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008076795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047133685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133322118","doi":"10.1177/0090591704272278","title":"Book Review: Stretching “The Political”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02041720021970197,"score_gpt":0.2699473762028781,"score_spread":0.24953017598317614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133322118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004119065,0.11238528,0.000007831671,0.08866838,0.00025145998,0.0001488804,0.00003311703,0.000103586,0.79798955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5670444,0.0019535224,0.000012482158,0.3798404,0.005221189,0.00003507883,0.0000057838365,0.000025527472,0.0458616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860066,0.00012100368,0.00023919143,0.0001431704,0.00016190523,0.0007340703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990967,0.00040951656,0.000023567261,0.00026978174,0.000047085563,0.0001533593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031013717,0.00014831952,0.00020064089,0.000025848436,0.00045176066,0.0000598804,0.00019835633,0.000023377705,0.013043569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008979531,0.00008592467,0.00012892233,0.000016105816,0.0006910739,0.00018200795,0.0000731799,0.00022134547,0.0013798976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004109098,0.000019715253,0.000006246479,0.00006277466,0.00002188211,7.5344764e-7,0.0009271606,5.2777597e-8,3.514979e-7,0.79855305,0.19813405,0.0022698855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068203146,0.000024439605,0.000010625342,0.00014344831,0.00005285259,0.000004705773,0.0019274266,0.0000069261296,0.000056515113,0.116143055,0.8814435,0.00011831038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043400498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028787195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75212795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004465801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022045539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134495749","doi":"10.1177/0090591714555577","title":"Shipwrecked Sovereignty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Sovereign immunity; Corporation; Political science; Indigenous; Constitution","score_opus":0.017904656941818947,"score_gpt":0.23422872761993235,"score_spread":0.2163240706781134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134495749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0106931,0.00000275174,0.0020903945,0.0015265814,0.0002531226,0.00005070332,9.1449675e-7,0.0001064507,0.985276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862538,9.609686e-8,0.00008403509,0.11081952,0.0015616921,0.000006003797,0.000014083846,0.00000994894,0.0012508314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.000019330157,0.00012701779,0.00012319355,0.00015826867,0.00024693663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967426,0.000100732585,0.000032192034,0.00010930493,0.000063308304,0.000020220643],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003525352,0.00007994259,0.00007649537,0.000059782677,0.00007616478,0.00011528332,0.00013045988,0.000032455657,0.0036756166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035261674,0.00006665585,0.000055154396,0.000058962934,0.00009079207,0.0003593942,0.000049477894,0.000070436465,0.0032511067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013054408,0.000030864554,0.00017826723,0.000010284768,0.000006012254,4.5851414e-7,0.0000019819763,5.510412e-7,0.000045606772,0.9985373,0.00096332555,0.00021228206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016437554,0.000003833669,0.00084651593,0.000005543341,0.000007870154,5.6275326e-7,0.000016984446,0.0016697968,0.00019456577,0.85079974,0.14620745,0.00008274954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026612614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014525749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018270317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061281476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137617981","doi":"10.1177/0090591713507934","title":"A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political culture; Political economy; Conversation; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Pragmatism; Social science; Epistemology; Economic system; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12364833206241839,"score_gpt":0.411159859143011,"score_spread":0.28751152708059263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137617981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030626863,0.00009104375,0.012062627,0.0299058,0.00041044437,0.0011739646,0.00010969058,0.00025372062,0.92536587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841908,0.0000010777184,0.00077864167,0.010393144,0.0014169845,0.00023634676,0.000006313084,0.000024935014,0.002951762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948148,0.0018023317,0.00041010304,0.00037781065,0.0003715371,0.0022234279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480386,0.012833486,0.0000426258,0.00031656263,0.00030407397,0.001699376],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252038,0.00024519317,0.00040605318,0.00008186167,0.0009851067,0.00014761809,0.00034168636,0.0003316821,0.0012257765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327656,0.00021191972,0.00024354937,0.00015440707,0.0036376452,0.000319637,0.00008308219,0.00047641867,0.0007946723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003987714,0.00014007007,0.000017808128,0.000035008747,0.000043215907,0.000042896154,0.0023013612,1.871276e-7,0.000009945333,0.9964277,0.0007318514,0.00021005806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031953547,0.00009971517,0.000054269884,0.000021197939,0.00006887077,0.00006461217,0.013685378,0.00009261268,0.00016235594,0.9825361,0.002605849,0.0002895099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001009471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048546528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002612653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02734212584362437,"score_gpt":0.34691117675757527,"score_spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141496769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04567479,0.00078428816,0.0003280824,0.011156659,0.004531835,0.00015011821,0.00025453407,0.00015337794,0.9369663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864981,0.0000049796877,0.00007305642,0.0016213286,0.011472216,0.0000041134394,0.0000059543754,0.000005908092,0.00031432777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738604,0.00071977236,0.00015304169,0.0001683723,0.00036221914,0.0012105494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972735,0.0015445579,0.000022582695,0.00012426177,0.000059000286,0.000976116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249939,0.00012299466,0.00015368241,0.000014737046,0.00060283137,0.00006532734,0.00018031403,0.00021423733,0.000111192116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00342814,0.000103651,0.00006300755,0.00010276465,0.0020804843,0.00024638616,0.0000996381,0.0003621288,0.000082743296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430765,0.00005048216,0.0005019589,0.000012101937,0.000012410131,0.000002754803,0.0011459154,6.225861e-9,0.0000020786886,0.9977953,0.00025744454,0.00017527182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371307,0.000016195574,0.003624581,0.000010269967,0.0000742071,0.000004033078,0.0012235255,0.0000013542912,0.000026644446,0.9051629,0.08956159,0.00014103642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052183116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025342613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025336392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007967911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141674088","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451722","title":"Isaiah Berlin as Essayist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Rhetorical question; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Rhetoric; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.0656464873582708,"score_gpt":0.39344186963205613,"score_spread":0.32779538227378535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141674088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012301318,0.00017187734,0.00026221716,0.017454496,0.00058542285,0.000081522725,0.000015624486,0.00013173337,0.9689958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807626,0.000006664362,0.00010795368,0.010628554,0.0031776996,0.000008402864,0.0000022875442,0.0000137573,0.0052920827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712044,0.000735619,0.00016857368,0.00013996345,0.00039051034,0.0014448712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966358,0.0018585696,0.000018892057,0.00019850112,0.000054568616,0.0012337029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324978,0.0001084475,0.00014522023,0.00003514518,0.00045848172,0.000043200955,0.00024554523,0.00022482991,0.0018845737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039850236,0.00009917649,0.00010445598,0.00011084167,0.0017292202,0.00024002568,0.000062935964,0.00036232194,0.0032832988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010887593,0.000099881945,0.00031257613,0.0000065955446,0.000009193994,0.000001962091,0.0019850468,2.5006713e-8,0.000005824199,0.9968925,0.00023869149,0.0004368061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007143108,0.000013756741,0.00035205708,0.0000072341945,0.000016796843,0.0000019035339,0.0014780115,5.414123e-7,0.00015854494,0.87379175,0.12398124,0.00012671601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005788158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014942436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013427218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015317342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147169714","doi":"10.1177/0090591704265931","title":"Brothers and Others","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Narrative; Racism; State (computer science); Rivalry; Sociology; Relation (database); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020003495919882295,"score_gpt":0.3299957686529255,"score_spread":0.3099922727330432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147169714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13358662,0.000095112606,0.0012925845,0.0042687966,0.00010017828,0.00010684755,0.0000060968046,0.00011824296,0.86042553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926557,0.000011313619,0.00022530339,0.005648755,0.00020677014,0.000006288006,1.9488212e-7,0.000009484977,0.0012362207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986214,0.00027786338,0.00010948653,0.00015958914,0.00016089705,0.0006707346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886787,0.00046873532,0.000012685662,0.00012279079,0.00002189053,0.0005060121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008998397,0.00008002412,0.00010254783,0.000030331868,0.0002832962,0.000045971414,0.00014762318,0.00008287329,0.00048644558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010555721,0.000071600865,0.00004235787,0.000080451595,0.0021231333,0.00015268169,0.00002730672,0.00011443867,0.00021233721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013175844,0.000020252295,0.000091774724,0.0000033491724,0.000006105005,0.000003224295,0.0013783654,6.8579044e-7,0.00005454135,0.9975047,0.0000059954177,0.00091780466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018697292,0.000023071987,0.00038805237,0.000014415255,0.000006472661,0.000002202551,0.0026584242,3.1909104e-7,0.000477902,0.9811446,0.014994251,0.000103318154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004975057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012199041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8591893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001023766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010719928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148598833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707299951","title":"Platonic Reflections on the Aesthetic Dimensions of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Shame; Virtue; Dialogical self; Democracy; Deliberation; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Communicative action; Transformative learning; Sociology; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.08464911667457438,"score_gpt":0.41384547338502564,"score_spread":0.3291963567104513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148598833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7368622,0.000047621885,0.0015855284,0.0028137413,0.00030598373,0.00018489553,0.000015563464,0.000047943267,0.25813654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437755,0.0000014111538,0.00019974928,0.0015501722,0.00004972648,0.000015244267,0.0000022161025,0.000015532358,0.0037883767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883664,0.00025019553,0.00022765795,0.00016244619,0.00010486062,0.00041820988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840695,0.000980484,0.00003652963,0.00038124408,0.00006207809,0.00013271908],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051009,0.000098446675,0.000118529904,0.00007919698,0.00021039454,0.0000058627065,0.000115675,0.00008172538,0.0014407579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010770271,0.00005573355,0.00009901066,0.00015808087,0.00036421383,0.000019815068,0.000027477621,0.00026188005,0.00047785926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046597903,0.00025826483,0.00009924782,7.1940457e-7,0.00001339359,0.000008150785,0.0004988529,5.0448176e-7,0.00034916974,0.99695164,0.0003698982,0.0014035719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036009215,0.00042776644,0.019369386,0.00003086373,0.00008796802,0.0001104333,0.0040386464,0.0000024691687,0.0045367694,0.9668929,0.003973469,0.00016920987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003387356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008246787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2575154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040688774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022415094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154796128","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329668","title":"Not So Novus an Ordo","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Polity; Social contract; Law and economics; Politics; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.12402404434066001,"score_gpt":0.3829714428445114,"score_spread":0.2589473985038514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154796128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08054863,0.000028344557,0.00047588252,0.018314404,0.00028547915,0.00008798594,0.000020797495,0.00020177341,0.9000367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98141116,0.00001013864,0.00022739344,0.014238766,0.0017114772,0.000005967647,0.0000025316683,0.000013868775,0.00237868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.0006875422,0.00017420005,0.00022235564,0.00040975888,0.0009876844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974338,0.0012905033,0.00001713204,0.00024715223,0.00008898076,0.0009224749],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010851789,0.0001088296,0.00015695348,0.00004062185,0.0009875837,0.000039577175,0.000313419,0.00021137216,0.0011195259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023577046,0.00010048085,0.00008925468,0.00011247379,0.0035512613,0.00019936405,0.000046942267,0.00034880734,0.00091799576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021004256,0.000102216014,0.00009766819,0.0000038778007,0.0000058705355,0.000024313722,0.0023307765,1.6262632e-7,0.000020615787,0.9969558,0.0000924628,0.00034520793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012057742,0.00003778607,0.00079573004,0.000005026865,0.000009158187,0.0000067315723,0.00073838735,0.0000073352003,0.00031445478,0.9700811,0.02773445,0.00014925451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008809898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003627235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9008626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010424741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158248433","doi":"10.1177/0090591709359593","title":"Theocracy and Autonomy in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Medieval and Classical Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Theocracy; Obedience; Judaism; Islam; Autonomy; Law; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Philosophy; Torah; Power (physics); Divine law; Religious law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019013598464196507,"score_gpt":0.2378588496994711,"score_spread":0.2188452512352746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158248433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.355567,0.00016938239,0.0000045107545,0.008405124,0.00039545147,0.000115733565,0.000022350776,0.000051122857,0.6352693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99450624,0.0000053785075,0.000026113801,0.002396107,0.0018082593,0.000013881281,0.0000036236024,0.000016840826,0.0012235666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888617,0.00010242279,0.00021090062,0.0002580604,0.00013389153,0.00040852753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990052,0.0005769216,0.000024844547,0.00016123356,0.000028742692,0.00020308858],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004014438,0.00015955712,0.00022180245,0.00007592321,0.00012869343,0.00008432736,0.00010858455,0.00007381824,0.0013964967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023801,0.00011895724,0.000041928557,0.000018760238,0.0016204754,0.00015014867,0.000095302654,0.00045262103,0.00007277155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026872569,0.000063479994,0.00014221233,0.000032772605,0.000009848281,0.000008397792,0.0017615187,4.5632547e-9,0.000104055114,0.99436027,0.000030113,0.0034604666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036927362,0.000057717756,0.00069801055,0.000021017138,0.00001647076,0.00000770541,0.00024845504,0.00004027383,0.000048137797,0.9826858,0.015645353,0.00016175781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027850117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060683793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6389392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014256063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003264474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163111576","doi":"10.1177/0090591703251146","title":"Heidegger's Dasein and the Liberal Conception of the Self","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Politics; Liberalism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018673369959709307,"score_gpt":0.30563676914137994,"score_spread":0.28696339918167063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163111576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09591335,0.00023804346,0.0001192608,0.012035132,0.00027620172,0.00026533697,0.00001018735,0.000038779686,0.8911037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.000011126555,0.00003670682,0.0020741017,0.00022434293,0.000007641837,2.0498187e-7,0.0000050079548,0.00058810087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664885,0.002612272,0.00014420052,0.000105929845,0.00019059004,0.00029817835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970615,0.0025745637,0.000024041383,0.00017479979,0.000040682917,0.00012444958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022799626,0.00006682565,0.0001243226,0.000009475344,0.00038762664,0.00002778495,0.00016952724,0.00006404183,0.0003269089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019128696,0.000035842033,0.000093253126,0.00010422288,0.0035936723,0.000059318932,0.00003701657,0.00014892773,0.000014482062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003231012,0.000028158343,0.00012016043,0.000005274162,0.000009685415,2.875448e-7,0.0018083666,1.0328718e-7,0.000010757806,0.99774724,0.000029082665,0.00020856888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031856558,0.000010882899,0.00017049558,0.000009419036,0.000024859442,0.000001453105,0.0013355656,0.0000026190667,0.0003501451,0.98202026,0.015703784,0.000051966705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033526416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024539997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90113944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000205892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056092675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168652425","doi":"10.1177/0090591714525172","title":"To Be a Courtier in the Islamic Republic of Iran","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Acquiescence; Politics; Opposition (politics); Law; Autocracy; Political science; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.035214986947815385,"score_gpt":0.3138513087489161,"score_spread":0.2786363218011007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168652425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15046234,0.000046447705,0.00017753697,0.023875905,0.00017909177,0.00012403559,0.0000033512893,0.000015317293,0.825116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903649,0.0000034756629,0.00003470574,0.0074094017,0.00021025841,0.000011245372,2.6931016e-7,0.0000044250423,0.0019613183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985966,0.00055698666,0.00013838509,0.00010547791,0.0002264292,0.00037609867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896735,0.00076186156,0.000019969164,0.0001762695,0.00003278374,0.000041760948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023899018,0.00004984743,0.000121647696,0.00005312122,0.00015571374,0.000011038319,0.00025598783,0.000041519983,0.00016137931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014493265,0.00003561705,0.00004945409,0.00015072501,0.0005484447,0.000026547044,0.000034158504,0.000088871464,0.000027782266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063170755,0.00002630481,0.00013090893,0.0000031358875,0.0000030608965,4.175023e-7,0.024623366,1.3812094e-7,0.0000065353615,0.9721755,0.0017118442,0.0013124748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011043877,0.000042880947,0.006102405,0.000008328078,0.000007901014,3.024859e-7,0.02105942,0.000004736325,0.000008015532,0.7114511,0.26113427,0.00007019391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014455846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011204402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8399026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077015255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045011977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21853012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170826547","doi":"10.1177/0090591713476050","title":"“Office Is a Thing Borrowed”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute monarchy; Politics; Sovereignty; Law; Doctrine; Normative; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027208922250037692,"score_gpt":0.23019894450312958,"score_spread":0.2029900222530919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170826547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017314544,0.00010310321,0.0001811172,0.0016329456,0.000220588,0.000090213354,0.000024060048,0.00018677532,0.98024666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664758,7.675038e-7,0.000068698035,0.013374924,0.0008521815,0.000013000756,0.0000039718043,0.000032292566,0.11917832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833834,0.00022940381,0.00026946192,0.00025359343,0.0002037296,0.0007054655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856067,0.00053761195,0.00003174167,0.00035982582,0.00012394259,0.00038622678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028217144,0.00016643551,0.00020525495,0.000089438014,0.00029603924,0.00017353348,0.00025698217,0.000039086175,0.07214911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003145694,0.00013717817,0.0001808837,0.000030861,0.0008420579,0.00028946772,0.00007797793,0.0002279051,0.026944954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005239478,0.00005171183,0.000010338912,0.00001534676,0.000034680565,0.000005793117,0.0034047186,1.2652849e-7,0.000018402901,0.9838582,0.012393465,0.00020195317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009195161,0.000030585266,0.00009573115,0.000015140885,0.00006192581,0.000002985618,0.0020082088,0.00006639535,0.00010163015,0.52271676,0.4745963,0.00021238664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041357582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006151074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007831669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002235162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9738127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171918329","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329650","title":"Disability, Self Image, and Modern Political Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Personhood; Sociology; Opposition (politics); Political philosophy; Autonomy; Binary opposition; Identity (music); Self; Citizenship; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031160590587096047,"score_gpt":0.3471203260432779,"score_spread":0.3159597354561819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171918329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46424985,0.00006115554,0.0011609506,0.009311722,0.00016675754,0.00029788265,0.000019895539,0.00024172361,0.52449006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962123,0.00001495974,0.0004043694,0.00068424316,0.0004940074,0.000015240896,0.0000037355603,0.000015685964,0.0021554693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675554,0.0012699236,0.00024852355,0.00037543502,0.00041216053,0.0009384226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969843,0.0018910366,0.000023111226,0.00029782444,0.00008022501,0.0007235257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013831286,0.00014562863,0.00021238893,0.000027480302,0.00069116155,0.000074524134,0.00020198956,0.0001445155,0.0006295659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011265127,0.00010892466,0.000109772016,0.000098783705,0.008485082,0.000291545,0.00010694236,0.00018564102,0.00010019997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030581712,0.00034353134,0.006315132,0.000016965005,0.000016973983,0.0000064373567,0.0039668214,7.8754105e-8,0.000016459213,0.98841757,0.000050143517,0.00081932865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019244773,0.000026723947,0.016061265,0.0000053693066,0.000026922999,0.000012164441,0.0035093469,0.00003892293,0.00009361727,0.97825044,0.0016206291,0.00016215119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006600232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004489264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53196245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017255588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013475289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312325109","doi":"10.1177/0090591713499725","title":"Book Review: <i>Foucault and the Politics of Hearing</i> by Lauri Siisiäinen","year":2013,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social and Educational Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01784340811788545,"score_gpt":0.32050982629203706,"score_spread":0.30266641817415163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312325109","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006191209,0.4488036,0.000012202602,0.32814616,0.00063756044,0.00083500723,0.000056947047,0.000027946979,0.21528938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5650478,0.05477288,0.000054958364,0.23061202,0.0021470515,0.00013667479,0.000009275673,0.000026524142,0.14719282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673796,0.0010572008,0.0004493374,0.0002723616,0.0006111598,0.0008720104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550575,0.0034109645,0.00013334294,0.00021654164,0.00021912993,0.00051426765],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021234767,0.00017357596,0.00039921285,0.000022267275,0.00068720005,0.00010245483,0.00048296413,0.00012343368,0.0047743665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022774779,0.00011011869,0.00015634936,0.00026191777,0.007023294,0.0002491066,0.00013505285,0.00022572781,0.00027462645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032848534,0.000048444497,0.00018350007,0.00009140595,0.000015947644,8.735337e-8,0.0018709162,1.1346109e-8,0.000003592513,0.7124961,0.2847806,0.00050611433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017532139,0.00002490857,0.0008924815,0.00019715847,0.00006977938,0.0000014136702,0.00524178,0.000004778938,0.0000306961,0.5628358,0.43039036,0.00013547196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012000741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000096003605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5588566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007326384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003055425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1285266877168514,"score_gpt":0.3874451090091326,"score_spread":0.25891842129228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323106053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061745033,0.000033894976,0.000046716625,0.0028825905,0.000104458835,0.00010921951,0.000015232411,0.00013627,0.93492657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956064,0.0000013246107,0.00008699365,0.0020314218,0.0009423471,0.000008354599,0.0000012276355,0.000014640549,0.0013072719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.0006766951,0.0001940557,0.00035102016,0.00034661553,0.001247912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765617,0.00093234604,0.000020418112,0.00023870407,0.00008038943,0.0010720036],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187506,0.00016549596,0.0002026793,0.000076470315,0.0013595227,0.00005937613,0.00024345193,0.00023076765,0.0010216685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073851855,0.00014236732,0.00009255638,0.00007116568,0.004973303,0.00012515916,0.00006750965,0.0004588605,0.00023243217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025697267,0.00019942784,0.00007380322,0.000007189068,0.00001585345,0.00001529425,0.0086701885,1.5167723e-9,0.000005521812,0.9909397,0.000029349447,0.000017985443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015272888,0.00014976045,0.0016582689,0.000018046247,0.000024196155,0.0000024035332,0.008491671,3.4809685e-7,0.00021109707,0.9855792,0.0035150745,0.0001972116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096842676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017044126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059259495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326128374","doi":"10.1177/0090591715619337","title":"Book Review: <i>Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</i> , by Hartmut Rosa, translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06610963969518283,"score_gpt":0.35096713654489714,"score_spread":0.2848574968497143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326128374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009964537,0.22235602,0.008060236,0.057526838,0.00043181624,0.0009988338,0.00076114736,0.00032661564,0.70854205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881933,0.0014349755,0.00007652343,0.068649836,0.0017400841,0.000059832026,0.00018060349,0.00007839138,0.04584678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516505,0.00250526,0.0005422056,0.00031175808,0.000685066,0.0007906658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973602,0.0011269922,0.000083696796,0.00025806436,0.0001950002,0.00097602524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030453994,0.00025574453,0.0005386407,0.000041207553,0.00034695695,0.000056086643,0.0004478517,0.00026321824,0.0037165524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012463698,0.00024128152,0.0002650179,0.00025538137,0.0013009114,0.00039686242,0.00004259674,0.00035822703,0.00018129226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013317057,0.00015208156,0.0000011697906,0.000055859087,0.000025262098,0.0000017755988,0.0024676973,8.265171e-8,0.00017653921,0.7016329,0.29417136,0.0011820687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034619603,0.000052022737,3.4085653e-7,0.00006360132,0.00006403314,9.920128e-7,0.00034964524,0.0000020308996,0.0013285582,0.54831254,0.44930837,0.00017168491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010444799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026652112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096432974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030193882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332935222","doi":"10.1177/0090591713492698","title":"Book Review: <i>In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible</i> by Michael Walzer","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Hebrew Bible; Politics; Hebrew; Philosophy; Theology; Art; Religious studies; Political science; Classics; Biblical studies; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.014763618732343893,"score_gpt":0.24735614241757484,"score_spread":0.23259252368523095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332935222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011020282,0.30794412,0.000028079507,0.07237129,0.00021843686,0.0006841162,0.00006586978,0.00004495555,0.61754113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19442657,0.0050229244,0.000006735365,0.78905207,0.00041969938,0.00022092261,0.000019657808,0.0000233206,0.010808079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982754,0.00027406294,0.0003897394,0.00019991292,0.00020167707,0.00065918354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901557,0.0005563401,0.0000354693,0.00022135538,0.00006680354,0.00010444971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043315458,0.00016498593,0.00025582986,0.00010841077,0.0001207627,0.00012685443,0.00026923287,0.000051268784,0.015075941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018267734,0.00010041444,0.00010112131,0.00011800999,0.00043243286,0.00023583417,0.00006542022,0.00028051095,0.0010652886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016825951,0.00005217592,0.000017084454,0.000057829948,0.000004640211,6.8997036e-7,0.00069926324,1.0881751e-8,0.0000015925909,0.529932,0.46894467,0.0002883494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012782241,0.000043107724,0.00015139866,0.00019403116,0.000012403919,0.0000016198201,0.0011207933,0.000020770221,0.000010793541,0.1972706,0.80092424,0.00012241362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015848702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008160633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7166808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057052013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012976979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335250233","doi":"10.1177/0090591710378977","title":"Animals and Interdependence: Reply to Dolgert","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.015375673471944842,"score_gpt":0.3665213307881342,"score_spread":0.35114565731618935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335250233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72797585,0.000016043346,0.0005639397,0.011825691,0.0006404583,0.00040916615,0.000005737541,0.00012960176,0.25843355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932777,3.2686833e-7,0.00024009107,0.0027111562,0.00086233165,0.000026352674,8.398378e-7,0.000012780067,0.0028683746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804056,0.00046732122,0.00026892129,0.00029942326,0.00031934053,0.0006044397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983198,0.00069472403,0.000035858942,0.000304076,0.0003081353,0.00033739387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004434472,0.000105763356,0.00016105882,0.00010322746,0.00039437626,0.00013134234,0.00026761516,0.000100575046,0.0005575747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008522962,0.00009596198,0.000038829377,0.0002237691,0.00071177544,0.00013536529,0.00012461492,0.00028686554,0.00008819839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016138723,0.000020489306,0.0047202245,0.000017039118,0.0000049322607,0.0000030463573,0.006025865,3.5940047e-8,0.00031161014,0.98776686,0.00031546075,0.0007982961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008519956,0.00004534079,0.011037679,0.000010247334,0.0000056426206,0.0000051353163,0.010030646,0.000003718465,0.00021319604,0.9248118,0.05359927,0.00015212326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025254837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055273186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2653019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109568224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001748513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335328045","doi":"10.1177/0090591716642496","title":"Catching Up with Wells: The Political Theory of H. G. Wells’s Science Fiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Politics; Faith; The Imaginary; Institution; Identity (music); Narrative; Declaration; Environmental ethics; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Aesthetics; Literature; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art","score_opus":0.031932886003333126,"score_gpt":0.2504189024739024,"score_spread":0.21848601647056928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335328045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36761954,0.000018550321,0.003938923,0.0036610686,0.00087975623,0.00023085685,0.00005558207,0.00010227152,0.62349343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052337,0.0000028280883,0.000023773835,0.0008412103,0.0007622599,0.000010712366,0.000001575507,0.000019800995,0.093104154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979048,0.00031831043,0.00028534883,0.00030848032,0.0004141865,0.0007689078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813,0.0009832324,0.00007260665,0.000391036,0.00020423961,0.0002188499],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010044456,0.00018420974,0.0002038095,0.00012323224,0.0005237691,0.00009523011,0.00031409803,0.00005129535,0.0019211657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002596149,0.000087337095,0.00010192426,0.00007252607,0.0046173413,0.00033316162,0.00006756522,0.00017066652,0.00012170782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102836835,0.000055744225,0.0002903618,0.00001621385,0.000025549625,0.0000015397619,0.0022699807,3.7479288e-7,0.00036963058,0.99590343,0.00004318139,0.00092117843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044718428,0.00019969235,0.0030561397,0.000118952965,0.00006519383,0.000016931686,0.004377603,0.00002038427,0.0053739455,0.88901657,0.097071044,0.00023636968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022232844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028267687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5376141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015188738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013400514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339594322","doi":"10.1177/0090591716640471","title":"Book Review: <i>Leo Strauss on the Borders of Judaism, Philosophy, and History</i> , by Jeffrey A. Bernstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Judaism; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.03154044214282961,"score_gpt":0.24574529758044317,"score_spread":0.21420485543761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339594322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071663974,0.13520484,0.000020364354,0.20767502,0.0005147736,0.0004870098,0.00057647453,0.0000877473,0.65471715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736752,0.0061413036,0.0000038743865,0.22898218,0.001227827,0.00005138203,0.000013849054,0.00005509465,0.026772495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979112,0.00038423395,0.0004327812,0.0003219888,0.00034601896,0.00060375896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0017608812,0.00008327545,0.00042245173,0.00007472198,0.0003363112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042332982,0.00026754948,0.0003908566,0.000035850615,0.00012575106,0.000017897837,0.00029365657,0.00007429156,0.0129431635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038662556,0.0001336916,0.00018876806,0.000020241461,0.0023294494,0.00012041363,0.00008071112,0.0002237811,0.00021745978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040973187,0.00010702266,0.0000018715687,0.00014186726,0.000033397,0.0000016316626,0.00010011303,1.8719069e-9,0.00003008339,0.7374759,0.26170492,0.00036225695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019454701,0.00011365978,0.0000025984236,0.0004539118,0.00004025003,0.0000014823386,0.000023958684,2.3882708e-7,0.00021556819,0.4184796,0.5803473,0.00012691341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.835877e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73603535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033186087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98795915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2348057775","doi":"10.1177/0090591715625877","title":"For a Pragmatics of the Useless, or the Value of the Infrathin","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Art, Politics, and Modernism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Proposition; Value (mathematics); Expression (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Key (lock); Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Law; Political science; Programming language; Computer security","score_opus":0.053136839623748496,"score_gpt":0.2780976724256777,"score_spread":0.2249608328019292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2348057775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22617027,0.00032471685,0.009433319,0.061731275,0.004006444,0.0037519971,0.0030343959,0.00015173742,0.6913958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547639,0.000003401116,0.00003556059,0.0024174952,0.00045525737,0.000025969808,4.4478256e-7,0.000018100942,0.04227986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988048,0.00025273912,0.0003097045,0.00009381711,0.00018981972,0.00034909844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970067,0.0021885599,0.00012015286,0.0005077285,0.00012503212,0.000051840467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005425869,0.00010818851,0.00017515186,0.000013810472,0.00026797783,0.000020568426,0.00047467742,0.000045445235,0.00029721457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011585653,0.00002998451,0.0001965801,0.0000034939328,0.0021706002,0.000053249943,0.00014146962,0.00008763484,0.000008369409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026388963,0.000049462273,0.00004538629,0.000053893964,0.00003601974,5.8386135e-8,0.0155387465,4.801605e-7,0.000053102027,0.98245066,0.0015027317,0.00024304789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024427864,0.000042672324,0.00023383168,0.00008357529,0.00007012955,0.0000014410014,0.0021175507,0.000051105428,0.0031937303,0.8708959,0.123000786,0.000064966494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009819401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024716996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72859365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024852954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001540408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7997667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372909987","doi":"10.1177/0090591703253187","title":"“Words Cloth'd in Reason's Garb”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Art","score_opus":0.017672029352490872,"score_gpt":0.31797949797955105,"score_spread":0.3003074686270602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372909987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018958608,0.0003911723,0.0000612736,0.0020621915,0.00022174155,0.00008117169,0.0000028401305,0.000058176603,0.9781628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494625,0.000058806665,0.00022063326,0.0020156854,0.00023712471,0.000010069539,7.569962e-7,0.0000072293005,0.012503423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982619,0.0006895939,0.00010307934,0.0001448101,0.00021374966,0.00058683363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992861,0.00033966094,0.000013372337,0.00011938348,0.000026623717,0.00021487185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013469504,0.00006983852,0.00010386931,0.00000504641,0.00019828811,0.000032745815,0.00014440731,0.00015959641,0.0014723223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012739026,0.00005983465,0.00007464842,0.00018075272,0.0005698922,0.000076753415,0.000013424315,0.00018978998,0.00015849897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034905927,0.000041991167,0.00094239233,0.0000029050796,0.0000036655945,0.0000042837582,0.004860446,1.4108838e-7,0.000004837309,0.9928626,0.0010258902,0.00024739394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009505389,0.0000051475604,0.00033231883,0.000007908712,0.0000034199136,7.0362375e-7,0.011118081,3.2187842e-7,0.00006679513,0.68004715,0.30825162,0.00007148526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018649577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010538868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012058204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011693028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2443657003","doi":"10.1177/0090591716651109","title":"Responsibility as Responsiveness: Enacting a Dispositional Ethics of Encounter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Massey University","keywords":"Situated; Embodied cognition; Normative; Sociology; Active listening; Politics; Normative ethics; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05336935418280534,"score_gpt":0.39971338918640387,"score_spread":0.3463440350035985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2443657003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70607024,0.000036149257,0.0020641685,0.03055796,0.0002849551,0.0001481447,0.000074774915,0.000060264483,0.26070336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958407,0.000012473533,0.0000625921,0.00090635405,0.00022734566,0.0000070074925,7.120109e-7,0.0000093070985,0.0029335069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961361,0.002457494,0.00022870206,0.00021049588,0.0005276893,0.00043951054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98632306,0.012905612,0.00007147823,0.00021800562,0.00028995116,0.00019187697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075963927,0.000084305204,0.00014394516,0.000056034896,0.00039209696,0.00002038415,0.00021570949,0.00021098682,0.0010881809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020395044,0.00005861263,0.00010205534,0.0000840206,0.0015109098,0.0001746381,0.00006870751,0.00031407885,0.000079966725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003259629,0.00005867416,0.00034800833,0.000010216696,0.0000110570445,0.000004259554,0.004193792,1.3328098e-8,0.0055971327,0.9889668,0.000009747031,0.00047431694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013103864,0.000047065598,0.003552535,0.00008998488,0.00000920733,0.0000020150171,0.0022359616,3.1809742e-7,0.0055710436,0.98207086,0.0061948104,0.00009512797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034938444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006640684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28977048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001786346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007376536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497174511","doi":"10.1177/0090591716661222","title":"Everyday Deeds: Enactive Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Silence; Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Social science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0281936615050476,"score_gpt":0.3292949038784501,"score_spread":0.3011012423734025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497174511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82691765,0.0004806686,0.0009246061,0.0037249436,0.0006712435,0.00082586124,0.00004489016,0.00010437465,0.16630574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975022,0.00006726848,0.00004726135,0.00037358387,0.0005966715,0.000099617326,3.107963e-7,0.000010457031,0.0013026206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764895,0.0010167477,0.00017832857,0.0002022139,0.00024286247,0.0007109028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562436,0.003785587,0.000034809476,0.0001018768,0.00008393268,0.00036945278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006562787,0.000108056905,0.00018608753,0.00009255639,0.00016988399,0.00004279966,0.00012991416,0.0001373847,0.00007448422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034795417,0.00007611427,0.000031100328,0.00018062229,0.001187873,0.00020555894,0.000037236627,0.00011967588,0.000062441824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015230282,0.000025055437,0.0060787727,0.0000086850805,0.0000069050725,0.0000068766617,0.010019476,2.800423e-8,0.000119162876,0.98231703,0.000049950897,0.0013528294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035464647,0.000056976485,0.0038857155,0.00017794361,0.000012319641,0.0000025222232,0.051314544,0.0000042360043,0.0009899202,0.93773943,0.0052475315,0.00021419984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019762667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000813222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17058453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019655345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020023782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43767676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518817499","doi":"10.1177/0090591716630745","title":"Book Review: <i>Forgotten Justice. The Forms of Justice in the History of Legal and Political Theory</i> , by Allan Beever","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012474257656425293,"score_gpt":0.28665668624811036,"score_spread":0.27418242859168507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518817499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023757338,0.17522258,0.00020967753,0.10745893,0.0006205148,0.000831353,0.00014965054,0.000046035337,0.71308553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77952194,0.012313181,0.000026468068,0.16621998,0.00058954564,0.00005358327,0.000004475857,0.000025014611,0.04124583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698937,0.0012526178,0.0003659149,0.00019863679,0.0004894864,0.0007039459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510187,0.004207289,0.00009373288,0.0003138157,0.00009797739,0.00018532127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003442083,0.00014456642,0.00028928203,0.0000073009796,0.00017967836,0.000012369325,0.0005603374,0.00015679897,0.0006575798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023682185,0.00006270924,0.00015055975,0.00009589792,0.004030829,0.00019097737,0.00008016726,0.0002452979,0.000011951286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022696728,0.000051511328,0.0000229757,0.00019977434,0.000015492264,0.0000011811866,0.002910302,5.4348144e-9,0.00005822658,0.7932713,0.20323393,0.00021258018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019447916,0.000033688753,0.000087474684,0.00018639982,0.00025215445,0.0000039186243,0.009038699,2.628648e-7,0.0000505093,0.3094518,0.68060476,0.000095864096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014112327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018383413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77714616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020352482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022934581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519147428","doi":"10.1177/0090591716663293","title":"Coherence, Consistency, Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.0629267514145857,"score_gpt":0.37243749525636266,"score_spread":0.30951074384177696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519147428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05756827,0.00007247505,0.0010632015,0.01974711,0.00041643466,0.00009672783,0.00002328712,0.0000954232,0.9209171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783608,0.000008752576,0.000062678766,0.0012396063,0.0003747486,0.000007842846,1.12965736e-7,0.0000035739881,0.019941904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982014,0.0004552164,0.00013703917,0.00018232524,0.00038248187,0.00064157497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982802,0.0011442538,0.000040335683,0.00013801394,0.000063608815,0.00033359017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015514863,0.00006403233,0.00011057416,0.000012062662,0.0003473969,0.0000358862,0.00027560405,0.00007510846,0.002171551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021017976,0.00004013533,0.00006999636,0.00014118671,0.002042256,0.00014568733,0.0000395113,0.000048522816,0.00043496382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051949532,0.000016376443,0.0043633785,9.76528e-7,0.0000028080049,0.0000010858581,0.00059231545,2.265004e-9,0.000055806137,0.98521453,0.00096300396,0.008784514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098023826,0.000013153415,0.010322611,0.000013197952,0.000003933365,2.6499163e-7,0.0025119232,9.588373e-8,0.0001341503,0.90394884,0.08285944,0.000094344476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048920494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001017108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012338541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030638583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520497297","doi":"10.1177/0090591715627446","title":"Book Review: <i>The Structure of Pluralism: On the Authority of Associations</i> , by Victor Muñiz-Fraticelli","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01963110587418068,"score_gpt":0.31457624890436636,"score_spread":0.2949451430301857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520497297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044425152,0.080184095,0.00062141905,0.6479603,0.0015294488,0.0034277476,0.0026400455,0.00038333028,0.21882848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9421129,0.002015308,0.000020242647,0.05077135,0.0003473309,0.000014311241,0.0000044924423,0.00001946527,0.004694603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939158,0.004233218,0.00046882668,0.00021898143,0.00060747436,0.00055570854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843793,0.014525119,0.00027272018,0.00046416087,0.00019201108,0.00016670508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033998492,0.00016324976,0.000390234,0.000017935532,0.0003652234,0.000014545667,0.0007550799,0.00023078817,0.003801932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01230479,0.00007075136,0.0002275234,0.00019105223,0.002856751,0.0000909556,0.00008692943,0.00030729047,0.00007383438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013900274,0.00004311072,0.000050642026,0.000019751673,0.000030427345,1.8856507e-7,0.0006268237,3.201402e-8,0.0011600618,0.8525492,0.14535023,0.00015565116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012330063,0.00004925736,0.00019988965,0.00016661605,0.00005640307,1.635751e-7,0.00070786814,2.2751536e-7,0.0043917615,0.6735677,0.3206228,0.00011399992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081614635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053815916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89768773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016380314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011019137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520880326","doi":"10.1177/0090591715596559","title":"The Critique of Possessive Individualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Private property; Possessive; Debt; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05021306714651034,"score_gpt":0.3791271739592444,"score_spread":0.32891410681273403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520880326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02090326,0.00019777547,0.00044974612,0.014522034,0.0003557018,0.00011608403,0.00002134336,0.000043339278,0.9633907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487066,0.000009853652,0.000066751054,0.0023116346,0.00036096113,0.000012462517,9.440487e-7,0.0000056580884,0.0023610473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981905,0.0006916851,0.00018912306,0.00010232706,0.00021210863,0.00061425904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967084,0.002411208,0.00003412008,0.00016483976,0.00014024308,0.0005412007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358784,0.00006395862,0.00012216016,0.000021987873,0.00024754516,0.000045194796,0.0003098835,0.00009238104,0.00009216079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005803627,0.000045555505,0.00006339564,0.000068775706,0.0019308551,0.00011511911,0.00006930759,0.00013303888,0.00007611069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009630208,0.00002261641,0.00008100591,0.0000023269338,0.000009710536,0.000001935435,0.0016385147,4.6835744e-8,0.0000011827165,0.9963743,0.00062514876,0.0012335982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010208489,0.000020521891,0.00021406366,0.0000055448068,0.000008551013,0.0000010367961,0.009245437,9.727947e-7,0.00022199244,0.869659,0.12046438,0.00005643243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009151617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060208626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97396743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075583135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004396188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555043433","doi":"10.1177/0090591716677335","title":"Book Review: <i>Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political</i> , by Graham Harman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.015600589593219968,"score_gpt":0.31369666837104315,"score_spread":0.2980960787778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555043433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021280379,0.030991504,0.000900922,0.3417102,0.00035109674,0.00042034258,0.00008582399,0.00022946623,0.6250978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44517505,0.00574239,0.000027536882,0.5018368,0.0014483109,0.00010058064,0.000005126103,0.000043794895,0.04562045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954208,0.0011556047,0.00044911794,0.00039193546,0.0003986289,0.0021838732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944239,0.0036160254,0.00006281637,0.00050790876,0.00009721094,0.0012921356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021784843,0.00022748145,0.0003471712,0.000037714814,0.00062529015,0.00007681905,0.00067633425,0.00016721079,0.0047646165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034427529,0.0001305727,0.00024210215,0.00013240128,0.0020944076,0.0003542566,0.00014496603,0.00028142906,0.0013583418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006901498,0.00003661065,0.000024793606,0.000025073366,0.000015906155,0.000002881875,0.00003441735,1.1569079e-9,0.00003663264,0.7476927,0.2507394,0.0013846853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013325358,0.000013479911,0.000015876938,0.00016137976,0.000036303056,0.0000032483215,0.00017067669,3.4239957e-7,0.0004481911,0.3938872,0.6049784,0.00015165462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046304293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011817493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57947737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027513425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002554109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604478434","doi":"10.1177/0090591716688265","title":"Book Review: <i>Decolonizing Time: Work, Leisure, and Freedom</i> , by Nichole Marie Shippen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Work (physics); Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.01689201556127904,"score_gpt":0.3034673897689537,"score_spread":0.28657537420767465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604478434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006342792,0.072804205,0.00007941866,0.04970944,0.0002728075,0.00039521995,0.000044694356,0.000101029465,0.8759589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49713877,0.016740264,0.00025168748,0.17118762,0.0018436206,0.00014271874,0.000024025063,0.00008193238,0.31258938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977935,0.00041752247,0.00025212628,0.00032182792,0.00018944177,0.0010255678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972561,0.0013689665,0.000083494604,0.00048249523,0.00004440813,0.0007645516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020147958,0.00015683725,0.0003477127,0.000019627076,0.0011360643,0.00027425584,0.00056926114,0.00016833331,0.0031760857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043697646,0.00014979484,0.0000947734,0.00003335561,0.0021275629,0.0004595352,0.00025959846,0.00027541452,0.0007406548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000901862,0.000027270378,0.00034050643,0.000034149394,0.000012976134,0.0000039121983,0.000045365654,6.303167e-9,0.0000023666653,0.80917376,0.18751088,0.0028397625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016449371,0.000015037196,0.00040638418,0.00014690268,0.00003561594,8.378856e-7,0.000032076077,0.0000017480359,0.000027166961,0.18271753,0.8162779,0.00017427396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003496822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014865945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6287671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092448485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012262668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750838938","doi":"10.1177/0090591717725302","title":"Book Review: <i>Unconditional Equality: Gandhi’s Religion of Resistance</i> , by Ajay Skaria","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Gender equality; Religious studies; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.02668240783604248,"score_gpt":0.26934815839067117,"score_spread":0.2426657505546287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750838938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023757594,0.051740415,0.000017704895,0.0053800414,0.000531997,0.0001599047,0.001016992,0.000036154925,0.9408792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6879548,0.0012354135,0.00002555148,0.09960199,0.0023264433,0.000045158333,0.00029297682,0.00004470982,0.20847297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878365,0.00017461802,0.00032544718,0.0001897398,0.0002242205,0.00030230795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988462,0.00020000727,0.00018123051,0.0005282575,0.000105314844,0.00013904339],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053142366,0.00013606221,0.0002789444,0.000025401136,0.0006546874,0.00005574892,0.00029529934,0.000055350723,0.007792221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021154163,0.00011856693,0.00015035307,0.000006117892,0.0012212531,0.00023861499,0.00004205417,0.00015866256,0.0002464105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034039575,0.000031419047,0.0000025585123,0.00022276433,0.000013813708,0.0000019425104,0.0004992955,2.5004339e-9,0.000007859705,0.58072144,0.41845214,0.000012700753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011848152,0.00002513583,0.000004059979,0.00027250563,0.000028241568,7.424476e-7,0.000017619337,3.8895273e-8,0.00013390514,0.42707816,0.5722307,0.00009042022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035707933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009276466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73240626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048973125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053707245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765849185","doi":"10.1177/0090591717731109","title":"Book Review: <i>Exit Left: Markets and Mobility in Republican Thought</i> , by Robert S. Taylor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.010316364056990624,"score_gpt":0.30966449778460997,"score_spread":0.29934813372761937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765849185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002668354,0.13013165,0.00007179529,0.032909878,0.00028621475,0.0005651092,0.000053528798,0.00010013805,0.8332133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.613309,0.06972435,0.00030104164,0.16651572,0.0010539235,0.00013427797,0.000013936089,0.000070794646,0.14887695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974594,0.00083956035,0.0002721854,0.0004132141,0.00030475392,0.0007108906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817824,0.00054838206,0.00011942739,0.00063618727,0.00005579458,0.00046198274],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033349555,0.00014749555,0.00035321066,0.00002848548,0.0008860996,0.00010502876,0.0004733862,0.00011112724,0.0016442657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031758547,0.000136094,0.00011911342,0.00007976779,0.0040155156,0.00036052146,0.00011474979,0.00025703988,0.000018049492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019213381,0.00013041496,0.0015587369,0.00009244566,0.000010532769,0.000003983511,0.00091883884,4.2892556e-9,0.000017038588,0.45574728,0.5347769,0.006724561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015203001,0.000015892518,0.0038792915,0.000087184126,0.000015704274,0.000001286616,0.0006388724,0.0000026863124,0.000022205115,0.029779794,0.9652224,0.00018264553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009222192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006906708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68433636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017465766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011517074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804291774","doi":"10.1177/0090591718776938","title":"Poor-Led Social Movements and Global Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Poverty; Social movement; Politics; Political science; Culture of poverty; Economic Justice; Sociology; CONTEST; Political economy; Power (physics); Development economics; Basic needs; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.016679471327525112,"score_gpt":0.2560716456888615,"score_spread":0.23939217436133636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804291774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497466,0.000032703454,0.000011854004,0.001257051,0.00019688162,0.00010579645,0.000058455153,0.00007455431,0.048516072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938878,0.0000030670872,0.00006970288,0.0037968527,0.0012459921,0.0000072517764,0.0000215718,6.486901e-7,0.00096711476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878156,0.000104617786,0.000153227,0.00024239362,0.00019621199,0.00052199786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951905,0.00012988492,0.000029105939,0.000025619724,0.00006988476,0.00022645897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020041116,0.00014081638,0.0001411007,0.0000030906983,0.00033515078,0.00005350948,0.00014872196,0.0001019279,0.00051800814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095631614,0.00004587471,0.000045874476,0.00013721902,0.00022865731,0.00006498847,0.00014270261,0.0000709207,0.00020221143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039859922,0.000043111915,0.0017874904,0.000005056342,0.000016665452,0.000003385206,0.000041627478,3.7126262e-9,0.0004070125,0.9846889,0.001297317,0.011669605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015250477,0.00010073093,0.39876792,0.00000691628,0.000027112947,0.0000101112555,0.0005660685,0.0000034400766,0.00048001262,0.58974314,0.00996766,0.00017438427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055136206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035200785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39698043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058184698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006789554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56718254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808868027","doi":"10.1177/0090591718781821","title":"Book Review: <i>The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and Theories of the State from Hobbes to Smith</i> , by Paul Sagar","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008603850814158832,"score_gpt":0.29181624857519756,"score_spread":0.28321239776103874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808868027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12098779,0.14912061,0.0013912383,0.2996394,0.0018868374,0.0029873978,0.0025693208,0.00013462076,0.4212828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94156635,0.0024035668,0.00003118012,0.05396603,0.00032572713,0.000022085713,0.0000024317344,0.0000098502005,0.0016727672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978506,0.001003846,0.00030743983,0.00018880828,0.00020625332,0.00044304942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731594,0.0019886093,0.00007676097,0.00032312237,0.000097008204,0.00019854431],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018404718,0.00010152916,0.00026024663,0.000010137701,0.00025438794,0.000016746992,0.00037146083,0.00006656549,0.00054682133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018626925,0.000060203525,0.00009311053,0.00008351251,0.0057026115,0.00008830136,0.00017901829,0.000118080425,0.000019820804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018618097,0.000028535202,0.00015917465,0.000053659904,0.000016041145,4.2699707e-8,0.0014388167,5.758416e-9,0.000012536906,0.965042,0.031852804,0.0013777394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048352664,0.000028385266,0.00056896155,0.000103042534,0.00001590544,9.74113e-8,0.0005094971,2.729953e-7,0.0012826619,0.61374646,0.38364267,0.00005369619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015550939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057702873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004638241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001308308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2872121524","doi":"10.1177/0090591718786471","title":"The Rhetoric of Self-Ownership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Rhetoric; Depiction; Sociology; Politics; Rhetorical question; Subversion; Invocation; Law and economics; Ambiguity; Individualism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056810154213223614,"score_gpt":0.2815420788844856,"score_spread":0.22473192467126202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2872121524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058596064,0.0005332807,0.000052916803,0.0013693512,0.00040771562,0.000044078733,0.0000035637404,0.000059591777,0.9916699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633057,0.00003434658,0.000025197458,0.0003277601,0.00082604494,0.000009260729,3.850323e-7,0.000006246512,0.012440171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931324,0.00014085908,0.00015129543,0.000062905616,0.000106667074,0.00022501712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858093,0.00086945633,0.000035831934,0.00031079238,0.00015700288,0.0000459723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038718485,0.000059304788,0.000089223446,0.000015535743,0.0005074472,0.00003262805,0.00024365103,0.00001606025,0.0004232145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014272534,0.000032705033,0.000051332463,0.00002147788,0.001235796,0.000034470857,0.000080384656,0.00006446271,0.00024585074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010608365,0.000025474761,0.000026032343,0.0000035375344,0.000034504184,5.7493285e-8,0.006641543,1.9746598e-9,0.0000012739957,0.9905463,0.0016427605,0.0010679063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044980316,0.000039628445,0.00012038846,0.0000036096799,0.000012135565,3.315312e-7,0.00510609,0.0000030563374,0.00007636516,0.47318938,0.52136534,0.000038674076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015794307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000130139015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98047096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019851237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017751934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46339017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042393846","doi":"10.1177/0090591720943507","title":"Book Review: <i>Territorial Sovereignty: A Philosophical Exploration</i> , by Anna Stilz","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030166174887665154,"score_gpt":0.3182426056773699,"score_spread":0.28807643078970474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042393846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000650147,0.030598389,0.0026980573,0.5094785,0.0012553983,0.0009420372,0.0005611603,0.00054547004,0.45385596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23097566,0.00409455,0.00017686228,0.7479005,0.013234983,0.00012291083,0.00010975553,0.00008309794,0.0033016736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577475,0.0011375679,0.00048799734,0.00049328874,0.0008640062,0.0012424116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967296,0.0010244905,0.00006551124,0.00029608895,0.00015760589,0.0017266696],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008369491,0.00025382914,0.00044537373,0.00002530664,0.00034126666,0.000098197015,0.00055262045,0.00024967492,0.003849196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005841477,0.0002475127,0.00021561899,0.0002470195,0.0011945748,0.00054927677,0.00015453745,0.0004915493,0.00094545726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020202,0.000059394555,0.0000035573203,0.000072597104,0.000012904388,0.000008571439,0.0002551284,1.17411254e-7,0.00000827292,0.7472184,0.25215405,0.00016682096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018152819,0.000065361535,0.0000011559478,0.00006437259,0.00003760564,7.576837e-7,0.0001571496,0.00004522271,0.000024188164,0.4883117,0.51092327,0.00018772193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009290547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030560168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45055428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017828008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035771463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084410903","doi":"10.1177/0090591720952056","title":"Laughing with Leviathan: Hobbesian Laughter in Theory and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Rhetoric; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Adversary; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05017537227571865,"score_gpt":0.2822843875170103,"score_spread":0.23210901524129163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084410903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032497954,0.0009709518,0.00058467843,0.08293353,0.00020915712,0.00037070032,0.00009924263,0.00019023193,0.88214356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96189785,0.000015352756,0.00015069605,0.035647076,0.0014078609,0.000015522592,0.00000809475,0.000034725726,0.0008227969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974875,0.00094226917,0.0002797063,0.00036615826,0.0002374237,0.00068695383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954898,0.0036990806,0.000040558043,0.00017387398,0.00005215578,0.00054456585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096121,0.0002331608,0.0003007796,0.000050720086,0.00013992141,0.00015089751,0.0001645569,0.00007186495,0.0017652937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016283456,0.00016342213,0.00006517039,0.00005749451,0.00084398116,0.0003546138,0.00010287992,0.00043096757,0.00018690832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007333075,0.00012941707,0.000061010793,0.000057355846,0.000038736493,0.00008259044,0.0055396813,2.1455035e-7,0.000012604428,0.9927638,0.00010431705,0.00047693576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005625575,0.00021643148,0.0001268698,0.00006403268,0.00006180688,0.000037775768,0.004690635,0.000012190677,0.000055766337,0.85217035,0.14173156,0.00027001888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003433189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009592034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029935336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026836942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088037499","doi":"10.1177/0090591720960438","title":"Lyons and Tygers and Wolves, Oh My! Human Equality and the “Dominion Covenant” in Locke’s <i>Two Treatises</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Covenant; Punishment (psychology); Power (physics); Humanity; Creatures; Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Theology; Political science; Natural (archaeology); History; Ecology","score_opus":0.03340030916116202,"score_gpt":0.3390903998550614,"score_spread":0.3056900906938994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088037499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37082338,0.0011390849,0.000417127,0.035818115,0.00007339102,0.00038167607,0.00013702587,0.000054893768,0.5911553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930504,0.00009936646,0.00004675318,0.006274913,0.00021615003,0.00000786537,0.000003272078,0.0000054197403,0.000295872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828756,0.0007829383,0.00018112517,0.00019808016,0.00015949734,0.0003908185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976728,0.0018104991,0.000034162582,0.00008067307,0.000021860684,0.0003799878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009357622,0.00010188074,0.0002163207,0.000018193236,0.0004145555,0.00006211405,0.00008612345,0.00005576734,0.00005559814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007157424,0.000073596435,0.000030666408,0.000085207845,0.0063265394,0.000079300575,0.00007359414,0.0001516602,0.0000037220561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055843127,0.000013473445,0.0033399046,0.000011080847,0.000008669678,0.0000031989223,0.0022689889,1.4319234e-7,0.000015126834,0.9937021,0.0000630026,0.00051842735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022161037,0.00007205935,0.0047784485,0.000041131425,0.000062878185,0.000007872696,0.009398107,0.000026748503,0.00004516401,0.9087607,0.07432479,0.0002659564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004574363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034165767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.622227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004064148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021289696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110057919","doi":"10.1177/0090591720976568","title":"Book Review: <i>The Virtues of Violence: Democracy Against Disintegration in Modern France</i> , by Kevin Duong","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.010648732306368246,"score_gpt":0.29706374828069804,"score_spread":0.2864150159743298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110057919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047673676,0.4120516,0.011828976,0.20905359,0.00040559814,0.0021571089,0.0002823647,0.000317196,0.3162299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8125166,0.013672484,0.00001877036,0.1732481,0.00017312897,0.000021367438,0.000005153797,0.00001078611,0.00033358057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697965,0.001296632,0.00046295082,0.0002557274,0.00037756233,0.0006275001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979933,0.0012814057,0.00007673554,0.00021792958,0.00007388506,0.00035673045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735447,0.00014604429,0.0003139746,0.000017842503,0.00020778342,0.000026440659,0.0004967605,0.0000989929,0.000334687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004250799,0.00010649505,0.00012109782,0.00025981115,0.001567195,0.0003463664,0.00006074552,0.00032802933,0.000061129525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023431096,0.00004313781,0.00014511358,0.00009262493,0.000005444464,0.0000018831591,0.0007372489,0.0000014331881,0.00033823604,0.98512685,0.005383932,0.008100664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014808733,0.000042204472,0.000108598586,0.0011163708,0.000019308669,3.443404e-7,0.0007725822,0.00017311652,0.0018565822,0.89178616,0.103793256,0.00018338718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000094652074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022183003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7648429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011325242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57743955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153860839","doi":"10.1177/00905917211008591","title":"Land Grabbing and the Perplexities of Territorial Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Land grabbing; Alienation; Democracy; Corporate governance; Political science; Land law; Political economy; Law; Land tenure; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.012607858700101343,"score_gpt":0.20584149080577238,"score_spread":0.19323363210567104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153860839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97841424,0.00034541686,0.0000031397065,0.0010671619,0.0003022337,0.00007816099,0.00003418098,0.000021957541,0.019733502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981225,0.000025048985,0.000033592027,0.00040262382,0.0008950671,0.0000063613775,0.00001941761,5.193785e-7,0.00049488066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910235,0.00020567264,0.00015285752,0.00013845008,0.00015494725,0.0002457266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989135,0.00087266555,0.00002873329,0.000036995072,0.000063577114,0.000084474894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028165887,0.00009483178,0.00017848112,0.0000025307452,0.00012203257,0.00003801196,0.00010010228,0.00005763663,0.0003043015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029120475,0.000021944292,0.00007268052,0.00006912325,0.00026249414,0.00003932412,0.00011307838,0.000087306486,0.000005500127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005752898,0.000016861648,0.002394435,0.0000062484705,0.000016150316,0.0000023164098,0.000086205175,6.902627e-8,0.00019336093,0.9954678,0.00016559994,0.0015934206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003047893,0.000022846869,0.052915525,0.00001528938,0.000016614533,0.000014604837,0.0012750805,0.0000030683793,0.0028093085,0.93924695,0.0032876334,0.00008827531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010513331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003710019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056220837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012103438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010072569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3331888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170568441","doi":"10.1177/00905917211020772","title":"Book Review: <i>On Borders: Territories, Legitimacy, and the Rights of Place</i> , by Paulina Ochoa Espejo","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008432661837847945,"score_gpt":0.3077365056950558,"score_spread":0.2993038438572078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170568441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035856268,0.2673834,0.0000593572,0.13113688,0.0003715794,0.0005683226,0.00021926686,0.000087721266,0.5998149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71230936,0.023422226,0.00024124557,0.20873344,0.0032494373,0.00025976857,0.000044948636,0.00008795056,0.051651593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966252,0.0015208723,0.00032890923,0.0002953327,0.0005216348,0.0007080799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957722,0.0033970745,0.00006118362,0.00029682086,0.00015996136,0.00031276877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012080221,0.00017788677,0.000463748,0.000013559008,0.000555895,0.000049879414,0.00024230496,0.00010588164,0.0007202836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003029352,0.00011784259,0.00014899939,0.00015618745,0.005175126,0.000090003705,0.00011838666,0.000257971,0.00004253616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045683144,0.00005521532,0.000028820701,0.000071317845,0.000041864798,0.000005581574,0.0019208305,4.6047797e-9,9.81839e-7,0.8954071,0.102199286,0.00022330442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044654348,0.000020475452,0.00001554531,0.00020435537,0.00006130886,0.000002113825,0.0048739305,4.5797466e-7,0.00013109113,0.3406416,0.65349257,0.00010998699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082455075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71195084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000916733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015387977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170591943","doi":"10.1177/00905917211021796","title":"Martin Luther King Jr. on Democratic Propaganda, Shame, and Moral Transformation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Shame; Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; White (mutation); Political science; History","score_opus":0.039360600682068474,"score_gpt":0.2266899206312947,"score_spread":0.18732931994922622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170591943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20402984,0.000103351274,0.000057256842,0.0014565657,0.00023224278,0.000097024225,0.000028121554,0.000045813224,0.7939498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995006,9.3366e-7,0.000015060667,0.0025804786,0.00051704125,0.000008693597,0.000010972224,0.000012909449,0.0069038607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992433,0.00014326496,0.0001464897,0.00012266172,0.00009836241,0.0002459014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964845,0.0001039738,0.000017841587,0.00009857797,0.000035362802,0.00009578132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017485439,0.00009527014,0.00011261251,0.000037375525,0.00027427607,0.000071163544,0.000038737642,0.00003566946,0.0026582957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038904476,0.00007992597,0.000047174664,0.000014274848,0.00025238015,0.0001221427,0.000008661035,0.00013229217,0.00017684634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036582816,0.00004407386,0.00001989882,0.000050570376,0.000010617655,0.000013484786,0.015847111,3.3299492e-7,0.000022696979,0.9831744,0.000089060915,0.0006911825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000236678,0.000070466864,0.00006903457,0.00004669042,0.00002373353,0.000009457293,0.00087579753,0.000055684548,0.00065598707,0.9610129,0.03680465,0.00013891594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000067033884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011604883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029647088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026114058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176645292","doi":"10.1177/00905917211026704","title":"Book Review: <i>influx &amp; efflux: writing up with Walt Whitman</i> , by Jane Bennett","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Poetry Analysis and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Efflux; Philosophy; Art; History; Chemistry; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.015360669130286306,"score_gpt":0.2532700029687467,"score_spread":0.23790933383846039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176645292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020244627,0.2345335,0.00036036162,0.014071822,0.00029015093,0.0002110094,0.00024209656,0.00017877866,0.7480878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24597909,0.004084081,0.00007735439,0.28629184,0.001984282,0.000075726995,0.00042151142,0.00010074179,0.46098536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768925,0.00031732477,0.00045118283,0.00039601524,0.00033704686,0.0008091806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839926,0.00048297743,0.000059609956,0.000482389,0.00024420486,0.00033158148],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004959973,0.00025933445,0.0004940049,0.000037503927,0.0003707396,0.00019998198,0.00019922819,0.000059524158,0.03534713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026339662,0.0002021167,0.00020794768,0.00006563346,0.00051122945,0.00022318747,0.00008325393,0.00031467387,0.00075801404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008027659,0.000069125475,0.000011124766,0.0002490917,0.00007037522,0.000017906805,0.00025885616,1.14461926e-7,0.00003498063,0.7129731,0.28604522,0.00026204335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024894436,0.000038239887,0.0000074915642,0.0006604355,0.00028316738,0.000031601994,0.0008583107,0.000004011728,0.0005587605,0.03239941,0.9645974,0.000312239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000300343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031967844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6805737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004300168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060846778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97429895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177088810","doi":"10.1177/00905917211027967","title":"Book Review: <i>Colonial Capitalism and the Dilemmas of Liberalism</i> , by Onur Ulas Ince","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Indian Economic and Social Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Colonialism; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.007693827330325186,"score_gpt":0.2020659153550596,"score_spread":0.1943720880247344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177088810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02604019,0.70117617,0.0004062895,0.053058986,0.0007665029,0.00053821824,0.00065711566,0.000032172316,0.21732436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6698787,0.041835003,0.00023611491,0.23854133,0.00039914998,0.000096896874,0.000064387954,0.00005622326,0.048892144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.000102021746,0.0005407268,0.00023760684,0.000029157201,0.00032869555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918425,0.00032134244,0.00013830197,0.00021571832,0.000028337256,0.00011203445],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008253053,0.00011291717,0.00047324787,0.000022708384,0.00009272332,0.000026357739,0.00014224357,0.00007961053,0.0013926699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003271105,0.0001019718,0.00011573538,0.00005646478,0.000498906,0.00008464614,0.00009864662,0.00013344546,0.0001691482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012415159,0.00002284449,0.00016319449,0.00007399501,0.000038341757,0.0000029702067,0.00048786562,4.2221068e-8,8.63303e-7,0.9299459,0.06915706,0.00009453679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051844853,0.000008462196,0.00053876225,0.00004762681,0.000010574338,0.000006093539,0.000043101933,0.0000054011334,0.00012984202,0.4935123,0.5050568,0.00012256118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082557955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017727438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65934116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007145691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058564245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198419904","doi":"10.1177/00905917211039749","title":"Review Essay: Energopolitics, the Eurocene, and Critical Theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.019563029978124848,"score_gpt":0.3301861922969512,"score_spread":0.3106231623188263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198419904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061742505,0.102258466,0.0011365915,0.046297133,0.00036849637,0.00022568088,0.000041193976,0.00020667019,0.8432915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95284206,0.002159975,0.00011132137,0.03593564,0.00035642163,0.00004329931,0.000014413926,0.00003939196,0.0084975045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480253,0.002821769,0.00035449213,0.00046288868,0.00034663785,0.001211656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930512,0.005115329,0.000018577792,0.00077886565,0.0004589034,0.00057715876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002095213,0.0002300066,0.00035035642,0.00003209413,0.00032636413,0.00008964717,0.00033248076,0.0001377224,0.0016947996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019656697,0.00015811627,0.00016789074,0.0002522131,0.0017418904,0.00009748753,0.00041663653,0.00046877936,0.000105776904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034012603,0.00009676944,0.000031970056,0.0006543621,0.000038505,0.00010822893,0.000038023845,0.0000027217552,0.000012976584,0.9892926,0.00038534484,0.00930449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014122904,0.000029899458,0.00017656232,0.0001902494,0.00006842955,0.00014979778,0.0006552204,0.000027432903,0.0005281145,0.8899455,0.10791201,0.00017555113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012765313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016137643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001270613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042422075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216475987","doi":"10.1177/00905917211065064","title":"Settling Accounts at the End of History: A Nonideal Approach to State Apologies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Hegemony; Power (physics); Governmentality; Individualism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03924193129292487,"score_gpt":0.3066311663187966,"score_spread":0.26738923502587175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216475987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86628515,0.0005755199,0.000084686486,0.0004972079,0.00093833177,0.00022020005,0.00015312458,0.000051198673,0.13119458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865525,0.0000013900228,0.000037100614,0.00083594146,0.000040354375,0.0001464953,0.000013526989,0.000024746507,0.012347962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841994,0.00035665187,0.00021906893,0.00025337178,0.00022144585,0.0005295493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990719,0.0003610772,0.000055486667,0.00038218152,0.000023299464,0.000106060565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007268729,0.00011988159,0.00019228047,0.000073721385,0.00018360699,0.0000042578463,0.00034317482,0.00006224255,0.004538163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043684282,0.00008253112,0.0001023575,0.00010082111,0.0005436326,0.000017406777,0.0003803293,0.00033999252,0.0001380025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002483138,0.00022004991,0.0006255392,0.000009916541,0.000059466376,0.000012634363,0.0034545385,0.00009733167,0.00044498366,0.9920379,0.0017795921,0.0010097153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003016791,0.0013535703,0.06429332,0.000035120484,0.0005207693,0.0005053442,0.0519152,0.00007936296,0.0018977313,0.47813076,0.39677754,0.0014745068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032750826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020604703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51390713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043166828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005826117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221078462","doi":"10.1177/00905917221076085","title":"Book Review: <i>Cinema Pessimism: A Political Theory of Representation and Reciprocity</i> , by Joshua Foa Dienstag","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Cinema and Media Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Movie theater; Representation (politics); Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Art history; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026065499502657744,"score_gpt":0.2627089754513029,"score_spread":0.23664347594864515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221078462","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012492061,0.6462759,0.0020834845,0.031107986,0.00083373033,0.001037241,0.001578798,0.00010682761,0.304484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935947,0.012272376,0.0001661663,0.07157046,0.0003351097,0.00036962546,0.000089221074,0.00006909138,0.021533236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979316,0.00021008648,0.00069239404,0.00044622418,0.00009959065,0.0006201086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821657,0.0009499038,0.00017591885,0.00035417767,0.000042309544,0.00026113982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013745227,0.00017343662,0.000640652,0.000108928034,0.00018333396,0.00001241291,0.00017100484,0.000051113755,0.002234808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017265063,0.00017950004,0.00015306498,0.00016970077,0.0004060479,0.000099108045,0.00028489146,0.00025138707,0.00003621401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005567092,0.00010104882,0.0009381566,0.00025019326,0.000048108745,0.000004700936,0.00020158995,1.1206852e-7,0.00001668832,0.89819527,0.099799335,0.0003891239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053942244,0.00014237172,0.00071061123,0.00006895212,0.000049299917,0.000024386063,0.0009765533,0.000014583319,0.00024201852,0.6678545,0.32915446,0.00022284451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004357986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.8079806e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098231954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025513566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248973662","doi":"10.1177/0090591709348193","title":"Citizens of the World","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495528448430352,"score_gpt":0.3629069642109506,"score_spread":0.3133541193679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248973662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062463568,0.000026368923,0.000056151734,0.054063987,0.00016727089,0.00006456823,0.000007897387,0.00003559033,0.9393318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98290104,0.0000014046233,0.000037905407,0.010936316,0.00045805617,9.500544e-7,1.9255053e-7,0.0000031637028,0.005660996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849546,0.00047449916,0.00014152356,0.00009086053,0.000292032,0.000505625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.0010661981,0.00002158715,0.00019614665,0.000051644787,0.00023043928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008688771,0.00005732597,0.00010416215,0.00002769942,0.00024135977,0.000013031513,0.0003001654,0.00007461019,0.00031547324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018573606,0.00003923954,0.00011393899,0.0002013919,0.0014935374,0.000041499683,0.000028979315,0.00023206834,0.000042915646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062232934,0.000033009812,0.000056170673,0.0000023631933,0.0000029707114,5.451437e-7,0.00043009562,1.3668205e-7,0.000020930105,0.9989235,0.00018322654,0.00034084055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005312618,0.000012253988,0.0027311468,0.000015290041,0.000010242584,2.7151185e-7,0.00025802533,9.988319e-7,0.0006532887,0.98561454,0.010598344,0.000052476946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075486205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029370527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97665465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048670543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011908306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5503001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254528727","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030006007","title":"Books in Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Historical and modern epidemiology studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.1293256818209135,"score_gpt":0.3812378370303886,"score_spread":0.2519121552094751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254528727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034835195,0.02943466,0.00009479591,0.025569836,0.000114935734,0.000082897415,9.953399e-7,0.00003973607,0.94431376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228091,0.010517461,0.00008303891,0.031417444,0.00029822387,0.000030092744,2.7830126e-7,0.000005927553,0.034838397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986084,0.0006153594,0.00014464834,0.00011262593,0.00008881705,0.00043015013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989473,0.0008057911,0.00001298659,0.00007943467,0.000015630263,0.00013883205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011119914,0.000048504793,0.00017675907,0.000018734734,0.00012954965,0.0000020804305,0.00010036409,0.000048377093,0.0009726063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033446255,0.000038920214,0.000049176913,0.00006353347,0.00050221896,0.000026918064,0.000022283202,0.000112255184,0.00042666256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1782404e-7,0.00002191601,0.00041726028,0.000017382174,0.0000023115736,0.0000035715914,0.000549504,1.0036372e-8,2.677268e-7,0.98567736,0.009728328,0.0035813896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032549706,0.0000059388094,0.00023311298,0.00006225142,0.000005272157,2.8034262e-7,0.00013682886,0.0000018745257,4.763185e-7,0.4719575,0.52751577,0.000048140962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028517225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009790151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110141256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010063399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386569268","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193107","title":"Colonialism versus Imperialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Oxford","keywords":"Colonialism; Ideology; Decolonization; Opposition (politics); Cultural imperialism; Power (physics); History; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07211415653491443,"score_gpt":0.3796386410283284,"score_spread":0.30752448449341396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386569268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46526498,0.000017879056,0.000027289836,0.006742064,0.0053238817,0.00019459272,0.000038797,0.0008018729,0.5215886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765999,0.000010329732,0.000026213509,0.0005738504,0.0011687381,0.000012259555,0.000005494921,0.000009684632,0.02159358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845904,0.00043597637,0.00010481661,0.00014211063,0.00022597729,0.000632069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.00068967923,0.000016675718,0.00012867064,0.000030096762,0.00029614536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001190996,0.00006725245,0.00010294971,0.000027388267,0.0005598671,0.000034260367,0.00018284952,0.00014217995,0.0013540944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009084561,0.00006860206,0.000100032834,0.0002202287,0.00085934694,0.00007844103,0.000034527355,0.000119811586,0.0015726541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003276971,0.000012217225,0.000038090104,0.0000022900992,0.000009198496,0.000009118661,0.008918021,1.6077352e-7,0.000021133565,0.97926766,0.011613237,0.00007608337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004028902,0.000041635205,0.00072357844,0.0000040890445,0.000018412054,3.0230484e-7,0.01477784,0.0000014005989,0.00005602777,0.42149925,0.5623163,0.00015828105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045714094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026641408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5577684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020357213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015723663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386772732","doi":"10.1177/00905917231193106","title":"The Art of Not Being Sexed Quite So Much: A Feminist Reading of Roland Barthes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Yale University","keywords":"Queer; Gender studies; Neutrality; Sociology; Normative; Transformative learning; Scholarship; Queer theory; Transgender; Opposition (politics); Binary opposition; Shame; Doing gender; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06299201384365997,"score_gpt":0.37075470567013774,"score_spread":0.30776269182647775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386772732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42626417,0.00014038444,0.000042294643,0.005352311,0.00038482706,0.0001929417,0.000046648864,0.000095402494,0.56748104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907835,0.00008144046,0.00002295128,0.00040208953,0.00022925701,0.000009593291,0.0000021677095,0.000010451425,0.00845854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979897,0.0005032511,0.0003312398,0.00016797041,0.00039237546,0.00061542453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938277,0.0056845034,0.000074160846,0.00021393533,0.00006791825,0.00013180147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031803295,0.0001001596,0.00025832755,0.000053480515,0.0007840456,0.00004461835,0.0002627589,0.0000746485,0.00003562066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002998534,0.000072642695,0.00010585627,0.00023379408,0.0019951544,0.000039580536,0.00011533367,0.000105930616,0.000051797953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035981455,0.000018828647,0.0020668525,0.000028307413,0.000046753048,0.0000015314638,0.057824265,2.5004928e-7,0.00030307425,0.9383464,0.0004898034,0.00083796657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021424075,0.000078228666,0.0040500406,0.000050075254,0.000047073023,9.0302984e-7,0.36853945,0.000021988797,0.0032228476,0.5702225,0.053380806,0.0001718695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024605868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001404241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56451935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003208937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012232471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388197903","doi":"10.1177/00905917231200828","title":"“Persons of the Sex are True Wonders”: Gabrielle Suchon on Difference and Political Wonders","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Closet; Politics; Deception; Sexual difference; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04651542337027485,"score_gpt":0.24974600306106093,"score_spread":0.20323057969078606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388197903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6426795,0.00002046856,0.00009850384,0.0066699535,0.0003282983,0.00017037902,0.00016862915,0.00013215191,0.3497321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868235,0.000002790226,0.000002384403,0.0019557667,0.00018413065,0.0000066342072,0.000005439719,0.000014056712,0.011005314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987,0.00018204324,0.0001952916,0.00016426378,0.00023647792,0.0005219243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897206,0.0004806817,0.000042886262,0.00025687806,0.00003616709,0.0002113115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022469106,0.00013632557,0.00018562214,0.00007283965,0.00031424453,0.00007523605,0.00016363582,0.00006228482,0.0006255697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023731973,0.00008476346,0.000096119904,0.000044531196,0.0010100338,0.00006540223,0.00008035783,0.00023115957,0.000117120144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020828395,0.00003777551,0.00040782292,0.000046927373,0.000015348787,0.0000014248923,0.0056182835,4.880915e-7,0.00001174216,0.99297345,0.00067255524,0.00019336147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004888019,0.000100408004,0.02547799,0.00011689896,0.000035427292,0.0000057279394,0.06560842,0.0006812087,0.00078481133,0.9002889,0.006143743,0.00026769162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018534262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004300118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34414396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040203788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032598145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.684955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705131","doi":"10.1177/00905917231210995","title":"The Ambiguity of Betrayal: Contesting Myths of Heroic Resistance in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Betrayal; Ambiguity; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Sociology; Mythology; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07029374130561054,"score_gpt":0.33371159697795144,"score_spread":0.2634178556723409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39097974,0.0007052617,0.000022385913,0.0012073464,0.00015042053,0.00015686346,0.000022248976,0.000068326815,0.6066874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733603,0.000013157711,0.000015817286,0.00004131091,0.00007526872,0.0000071035856,4.741362e-7,0.0000065732875,0.0025042389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821496,0.0005432734,0.00026458802,0.00012975639,0.0003089788,0.0005384223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974411,0.0021316414,0.00006341875,0.00018034388,0.00007622377,0.00010723062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024657443,0.000063893785,0.00016566715,0.000046838646,0.00018446088,0.000016633256,0.0002961179,0.000061251056,0.00002457414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003098251,0.000050590592,0.000070473594,0.00040023547,0.0009670763,0.000030311503,0.000054687014,0.00012966068,0.000015694186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017615983,0.000019077834,0.0022355001,0.000020447455,0.000005869855,0.000002046058,0.03752995,2.4741067e-7,0.00004738736,0.959853,0.00003247503,0.00023640358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014187966,0.000016936681,0.019224769,0.000039511666,0.000007657264,6.1494674e-8,0.08281905,0.000006736929,0.00024988505,0.89430255,0.0031199395,0.00007102474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035314058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062621053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6063563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035937614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012460601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37091196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405090512","doi":"10.1177/00905917241291148","title":"Book Review: <i>No Other Planet: Utopian Visions for a Climate-Changed World</i> by Mathias Thaler","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Planet; Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Astrobiology; Philosophy; Anthropology; Astronomy","score_opus":0.019233942989801512,"score_gpt":0.33391169342588434,"score_spread":0.3146777504360828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405090512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001023443,0.0821351,0.00037742592,0.035042748,0.00079437887,0.0007602344,0.0010660102,0.0003427866,0.87947106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022077987,0.010130523,0.00029280287,0.6162108,0.0039198357,0.0007109367,0.00017909588,0.00013595303,0.34634206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977207,0.00026260162,0.0002938549,0.00033219001,0.00017673915,0.0012138833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735904,0.0017979662,0.000023658795,0.00021885653,0.000032348045,0.0005681587],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001417722,0.00016813305,0.00028319695,0.000059702437,0.00030373357,0.000107245796,0.00024489086,0.00012572955,0.013727527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048005712,0.00014212349,0.00016148153,0.0001032212,0.0005114797,0.00018505327,0.000057573256,0.00021228567,0.002472128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008221691,0.00002530127,0.0000021426454,0.0002886897,0.000015005591,0.0000027199883,0.00009397892,4.314644e-9,0.000002667816,0.66373605,0.33542588,0.0003993273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008072406,0.000025188257,0.000003011835,0.00041221947,0.000043545668,0.0000013463783,0.00006162847,0.000012357389,0.000019448971,0.20154889,0.79763323,0.00015839095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020237867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041737643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58116806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009089551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012584623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408418245","doi":"10.1177/00905917251321287","title":"The “Recognition Trap”: Self-Constitution, Culture, and Mutual Recognition in Fanon’s Project of Freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Mutual recognition; Trap (plumbing); Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02978081949341823,"score_gpt":0.3104937600217614,"score_spread":0.28071294052834317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408418245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13411245,0.0004936139,0.0001305766,0.0010215242,0.00043982177,0.00040786064,0.000061554056,0.00006211445,0.86327046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910396,0.000049601455,0.00012709336,0.00019221078,0.0001728342,0.000026412643,0.000009986393,0.0000023137547,0.00031559943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988016,0.0005612084,0.00018843485,0.00013344863,0.00011943868,0.00019588412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991075,0.00065669895,0.000032060994,0.00007539714,0.000076561795,0.000051819334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010125444,0.00007172488,0.00010964437,0.00008160239,0.00038946708,0.000024705136,0.00008948182,0.00009587446,0.000019254967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081170985,0.000053165673,0.000045733075,0.00021977346,0.001088858,0.000111415495,0.000018018876,0.0001406881,0.000011008742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060340768,0.00006601627,0.00023529622,0.000023349976,0.0000116450055,8.753801e-7,0.003978858,7.575935e-8,0.00001633093,0.9922549,0.00010734599,0.0032449423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002631931,0.000023855677,0.00042837078,0.000047786107,0.000023884915,9.970422e-7,0.0016233377,0.0000067921283,0.00008179768,0.98223066,0.0152003635,0.000068945614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046593498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003719737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008926028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022484516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40119427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410236420","doi":"10.1177/00905917251336722","title":"Book Review: <i>The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization</i> , by Kevin D. Pham The Architects of Dignity: Vietnamese Visions of Decolonization, by PhamKevin D.New York: Oxford University Press, 2024, 219 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Dignity; Decolonization; Vietnamese; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.009550570406182618,"score_gpt":0.2775549958324187,"score_spread":0.2680044254262361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410236420","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007979039,0.70511204,0.009792537,0.107809,0.0013556165,0.0074065914,0.00425718,0.0002679362,0.15602008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85970765,0.045135,0.00025054647,0.010461389,0.00019576108,0.000075747834,0.00011494677,0.000068869485,0.083990104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995532,0.0018458995,0.0008591248,0.00042126165,0.0007134147,0.0006283056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634326,0.0015195172,0.0005446679,0.0006994306,0.00062095845,0.00027217623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017656166,0.00031570822,0.0008478647,0.000084441635,0.0012331096,0.000014782395,0.0011348359,0.00017984696,0.0004348888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004474229,0.00022508847,0.00038778753,0.0013099536,0.0027927826,0.00017671837,0.00042476808,0.00042327537,0.0000035319679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000129282,0.0006373329,0.00034937763,0.00066421466,0.0002790232,0.0000014359113,0.011257029,0.000017145207,0.00025611126,0.24160917,0.7425234,0.0022764879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058851735,0.00016258995,0.00013737191,0.0011870287,0.00055456173,0.0000011084005,0.009278814,0.000015528638,0.00097390986,0.024170788,0.9626753,0.00025452534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029876878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025546175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8517286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021706242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080989214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411796123","doi":"10.1177/00905917251350593","title":"Book Review: <i>The Greatest of All Plagues: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx</i> , by Williams, David Lay The Greatest of All Plagues: How Economic Inequality Shaped Political Thought from Plato to Marx, by WilliamsDavid Lay, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024, 403 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economic history; Political science; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027055597993663926,"score_gpt":0.25643821643996995,"score_spread":0.22938261844630603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411796123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46774048,0.05905527,0.0076774196,0.17178527,0.003914342,0.007956533,0.20062293,0.00057166425,0.0806761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93729126,0.004425613,0.0004304081,0.04157687,0.0009099127,0.00019048956,0.0016152262,0.00015555214,0.013404684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192256,0.0011013852,0.0024309396,0.0020605393,0.00019514131,0.0022894617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907179,0.004341278,0.00085272704,0.0026158972,0.00011647415,0.0013557114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029763367,0.0010965869,0.0025876719,0.00022075446,0.0004291212,0.00026856118,0.0026301122,0.00070486136,0.0012499832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011703,0.0009978262,0.0007798669,0.0002831154,0.001789873,0.0009922164,0.001287164,0.0010890429,0.00047155833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044798348,0.00034456057,0.0061044665,0.00027718797,0.0006308647,0.000008849067,0.00021739953,0.000018781135,0.000100554185,0.91942155,0.0723611,0.00006669716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016927121,0.00024078322,0.0022480418,0.00058836554,0.00040997952,0.0000081229955,0.000672544,0.00044853977,0.003192563,0.093476206,0.8957827,0.0012394071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053891665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026896992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019124366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042259437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412166187","doi":"10.1177/00905917251351570","title":"Book Review: <i>Honor and Political Imagination</i> , by Smita A. Rahman Honor and Political Imagination, by RahmanSmita A.New York: Oxford University Press, 2024, 200pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.008940918037890147,"score_gpt":0.27241511120344686,"score_spread":0.2634741931655567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412166187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004178976,0.099547,0.0031647095,0.020151263,0.00037839575,0.0006489519,0.0007815077,0.00014919379,0.8751372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027578706,0.011260471,0.00021062413,0.052340142,0.0005171566,0.00002023039,0.00009711351,0.000047657508,0.9079279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954489,0.0007023433,0.00051831116,0.0007690324,0.00051841553,0.0020430237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646896,0.00090569037,0.00008958644,0.00044064745,0.0003006257,0.0017945041],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009886296,0.00041515322,0.00056453724,0.00012908001,0.0008321337,0.00032097788,0.0005454313,0.0002606158,0.00053580914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090208295,0.00043430887,0.0001508894,0.00026636184,0.0028696724,0.000476664,0.0002541528,0.00045953618,0.000016034794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031482316,0.00011362419,0.00014469618,0.00018961016,0.000050346967,0.0000067553765,0.00004967093,1.0047902e-8,0.0000110394585,0.8136918,0.18507712,0.0006338496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061251485,0.00003489337,0.000060663704,0.00020883084,0.0001795101,0.000005627752,0.00052730157,0.000023007919,0.00009740964,0.23658457,0.7613083,0.00035735324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025792446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028515697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5771072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050247536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007403423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414850396","doi":"10.1177/00905917251374863","title":"Book Review: <i>Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought</i> , by Temin, David Myer Remapping Sovereignty: Decolonization and Self-Determination in North American Indigenous Political Thought, by TeminDavid Myer, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023, pp. 264","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Politics; Third world","score_opus":0.0055236777889120904,"score_gpt":0.2637016690894363,"score_spread":0.2581779913005242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414850396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91973555,0.018957444,0.0026266489,0.0054130955,0.0003285023,0.005292665,0.0013108208,0.00058309286,0.04575221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97776055,0.013155626,0.0013518659,0.00679944,0.00016259993,0.00004766187,0.00025173865,0.000061347586,0.00040917512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298406,0.0018029223,0.0011281313,0.0010380097,0.00083145575,0.0022154534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543273,0.0022850416,0.0006143994,0.0004936015,0.0003614402,0.00081281137],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015294213,0.00056639896,0.0011787601,0.00029816842,0.0008602041,0.00014983506,0.0005742989,0.00033799728,0.000050246563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001601072,0.0006520746,0.00016373064,0.0019684,0.0024870879,0.0005994595,0.0003355186,0.0007896279,0.0000048268216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015791687,0.0028417525,0.20007192,0.0021662072,0.00027730482,0.000058986054,0.02485777,0.000012393805,0.000054065193,0.75285155,0.0035756573,0.013074501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009654459,0.002764276,0.59713435,0.0046324995,0.0027223679,0.00012333904,0.066750295,0.013972108,0.0013289766,0.077890866,0.21477269,0.008253796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061087376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023500067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6749607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017456649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010076005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}