{"meta":{"query_hash":"3c90707e58d8","filters":{"venue":"Politics & Gender"},"cohort_total":76,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":76,"exported":76,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3c90707e58d8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Politics+%26+Gender"},"results":[{"id":"W1964055302","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x13000330","title":"Crossings and Correspondences: Rethinking Intersectionality and the Category “Latino”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Lesbian; Human sexuality; Reading (process); Poetry; Intersectionality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Race (biology); Art; History; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.04887972984493162,"score_gpt":0.32316516542770707,"score_spread":0.27428543558277546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964055302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40801427,0.0055530337,0.025364364,0.029004248,0.0007567745,0.000091247566,0.0001684775,0.00018653652,0.5308611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99142015,0.0006317045,0.0026434374,0.0006559692,0.00010715901,0.00007039183,0.00005663926,0.00016390803,0.0042505893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98908746,0.008111169,0.00020413082,0.0011541402,0.0007235451,0.0007195218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914003,0.0066507338,0.001131061,0.0016469731,0.00092371396,0.0005073999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009557282,0.000620469,0.0008110621,0.006543188,0.017762503,0.022188665,0.0025822192,0.003311217,0.008479813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018652972,0.0007112673,0.0006571634,0.0063556335,0.06253778,0.030897146,0.016699402,0.005219494,0.00068782497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029166213,0.000010240813,0.0022970787,0.000041540607,0.0000065692266,0.00017225776,0.60346097,0.00002786286,0.00019350696,0.38631555,0.00084287813,0.0066023762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001471553,0.000018092835,0.0038136893,0.0004236125,0.000022576674,0.00024219147,0.7490332,0.0002604108,0.0003377675,0.17804335,0.06775757,0.00003290455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017266978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021453327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022188665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006185514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035113064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05054432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967831320","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x09000026","title":"Tracing Gender Equality Cultures: Elite Perceptions of Gender Equality in Norway and Sweden","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Gender equality; Gender studies; Perception; Tracing; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11580831612467504,"score_gpt":0.41816275416583865,"score_spread":0.3023544380411636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967831320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909285,0.00051828416,0.000049112503,0.00029447052,0.00004405768,0.000005853654,0.000041789142,0.0000014012401,0.008116422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971993,0.00057276804,0.00007943604,0.00012191111,0.000014114239,0.000013664552,0.0000764356,0.0000054240745,0.0019170312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973441,0.0008818269,0.00020866912,0.00025645448,0.00046977337,0.0008392365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975656,0.0009565661,0.0004272027,0.000060358037,0.00038162956,0.0006087556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005277305,0.00034189815,0.0006061375,0.0026369432,0.0061511113,0.005857695,0.0005928899,0.00086171104,0.0023705212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004268058,0.00023945067,0.00031561195,0.0025292954,0.0039779525,0.002948214,0.00618817,0.001002713,0.00032452744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026027294,0.00015976794,0.26353964,0.00013019846,0.000029572733,0.0007798755,0.70076114,0.000119689415,0.0006092438,0.0055898367,0.0016441003,0.026376585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012760394,0.0001073282,0.17371623,0.00024302203,0.000018100842,0.0001409131,0.8130305,0.000110395624,0.00022749412,0.0007847631,0.011584036,0.000024405404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16502099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22107907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16502099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060799653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051740767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32812095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987429795","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x09990201","title":"The Numbers Do(n't) Always Add Up: Dilemmas in Using Quantitative Research Methods in Feminist IR Scholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Face (sociological concept); Field (mathematics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Feminist theory; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Political science; Social science; Feminism; Gender studies; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4672278900414181,"score_gpt":0.5796758687715056,"score_spread":0.11244797873008744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987429795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015813423,0.012563743,0.20383464,0.7209527,0.016817039,0.0010989624,0.00030528347,0.0004143855,0.028199825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33162656,0.009994144,0.38796788,0.23528637,0.013802931,0.0110146105,0.00015149335,0.001127755,0.009028184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3003135,0.62658966,0.023554344,0.009995975,0.038205538,0.0013410964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17643084,0.7418652,0.014730552,0.031135099,0.033832513,0.0020058132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.58463496,0.0015051893,0.0023164274,0.005268674,0.010746653,0.024081126,0.0070762304,0.008189702,0.004860567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73058635,0.0019693081,0.0013973109,0.0063864356,0.062397663,0.030149497,0.012398501,0.014992606,0.0022346908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028567424,0.00020170635,0.0069291783,0.0035372912,0.00028844908,0.00027320426,0.12277868,0.0008105941,0.0013577144,0.59373045,0.08230172,0.18750535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020650402,0.00025805522,0.0031528533,0.00859779,0.00015850586,0.00062286155,0.07545157,0.0044147833,0.0024881756,0.7441573,0.16015758,0.00033396643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028711886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00594607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41536504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066867163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009504814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5122191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999808881","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x06231143","title":"The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Prudence; Representation (politics); Voting; Citizenship; Ideology; Object (grammar); Political science; Yesterday; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0681192732031546,"score_gpt":0.38796716255364594,"score_spread":0.31984788935049135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999808881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032505322,0.03993969,0.0064502377,0.68877614,0.0041039283,0.00007722817,0.000021561025,0.000032200245,0.22809373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8588905,0.014086151,0.0019901933,0.08313647,0.0059794807,0.00026051936,0.000016631002,0.00013216134,0.035507977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97184867,0.024005884,0.00029633188,0.0007657072,0.001394265,0.0016890916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664611,0.03065666,0.00078514474,0.00054779934,0.00086782215,0.0006814502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024516951,0.00082924264,0.00080306176,0.0020658742,0.016525479,0.01941346,0.0026446674,0.01355618,0.0039155264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026404746,0.00049885106,0.0007760452,0.0021221815,0.089835666,0.01675833,0.00859459,0.017750552,0.0004885028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022213228,0.000018412604,0.00008643079,0.00006907958,0.0000027605593,0.00024626186,0.09378534,0.000039795315,0.00009665694,0.8930769,0.008638687,0.0039174785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052758056,0.000086417196,0.00051883905,0.00092825625,0.000011605322,0.00037606643,0.17066345,0.00038127782,0.00049488194,0.47830647,0.34814712,0.000032871543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071745315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074714166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024516951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014721177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004277993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003846455","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000219","title":"Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Centrality; Human sexuality; Constructive; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Focus (optics); Independence (probability theory); Element (criminal law); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07818005685223442,"score_gpt":0.3462182411075495,"score_spread":0.2680381842553151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003846455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048896804,0.006608172,0.019815728,0.036369517,0.00039926937,0.00005361938,0.00011836691,0.000056371417,0.88768226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764708,0.0013082182,0.0018756704,0.0015453427,0.00031671007,0.000074530144,0.000038056147,0.000038148733,0.018332545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916952,0.0043625743,0.00023973665,0.0012429762,0.0013707145,0.0010887604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202955,0.005380126,0.0006123848,0.0008419432,0.00053657196,0.0005994388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008190811,0.00039521544,0.00057850376,0.002079279,0.00843431,0.011967338,0.0010043302,0.0039257254,0.010372596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012394164,0.00037471415,0.0005614105,0.0014757428,0.07896295,0.009971673,0.008557886,0.0058781197,0.00060396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018742576,0.000003867172,0.000096748845,0.000004503414,0.0000013504792,0.00001608207,0.0020480445,0.000039476086,0.00002884232,0.9966658,0.0003340958,0.00075927854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008318547,0.0000063569487,0.0002886731,0.000031351203,0.00000220821,0.00003872343,0.0015841508,0.00008426976,0.00006163891,0.96446115,0.033426207,0.0000069064536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007136009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035041613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011967338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004383708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046872914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022622662","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000554","title":"Toward an Integrated Perspective of Minority Representation: Views from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Representation (politics); Dimension (graph theory); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Politics; Focus (optics); Isolation (microbiology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Geography; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22307543592744603,"score_gpt":0.42227172698925197,"score_spread":0.19919629106180595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022622662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30637524,0.019860832,0.0013082086,0.43624595,0.0011838144,0.00007666071,0.00035517785,0.000029394212,0.23456466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94172317,0.0072653284,0.0005287075,0.027389655,0.00014500256,0.000030303192,0.000076433935,0.000045386827,0.022796035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406224,0.0011181502,0.00010718893,0.00042459773,0.0018169805,0.0024707248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941275,0.0015047187,0.00024099549,0.000110382396,0.002144725,0.0018715492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046840026,0.00043565736,0.0006195076,0.0022869818,0.05403095,0.012275599,0.0031117068,0.0052114786,0.0054149297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006237776,0.00036025845,0.0004909135,0.004855968,0.01530205,0.00437563,0.005218866,0.009344698,0.00027071626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015872192,0.000075864795,0.010946,0.00030815505,0.000033833643,0.0014543963,0.3960339,0.00057203224,0.0009817479,0.4753034,0.07366025,0.04047168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036134963,0.000038086426,0.013387365,0.0008671279,0.000051465075,0.00034223238,0.5322414,0.0007778587,0.00054111367,0.026504759,0.4250327,0.0001797466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99707747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16637996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16637996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18226255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059108472","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000263","title":"Tales of Two Cities: Women and Municipal Restructuring in London and Toronto. By Sylvia Bashevkin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 2007. 184 pp. $85.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Library science; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014703543218265494,"score_gpt":0.2386375395465414,"score_spread":0.2239339963282759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059108472","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08883305,0.50110084,0.00040668028,0.17274466,0.0026343248,0.000059227325,0.001997313,0.000099998135,0.23212402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64253527,0.07532475,0.00021605282,0.00420187,0.00047997042,0.00005297178,0.00049548503,0.00011030112,0.27658337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994271,0.00018208321,0.000013954088,0.000044572073,0.00009654811,0.00023585372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.00015749282,0.00010053188,0.000030494595,0.00009032002,0.0003308221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000555238,0.0006180757,0.00039641417,0.0012617613,0.010065959,0.004981511,0.00096133974,0.0013625473,0.020431904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011232691,0.0005737752,0.0002688135,0.00411995,0.0071731177,0.0023606822,0.0031675429,0.0015818336,0.0013457445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009983743,0.000021375336,0.0060623144,0.00049427967,0.000034960445,0.0006860582,0.29471588,0.00027382956,0.00018672946,0.06197164,0.5905704,0.04488274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010366159,0.000011606581,0.026131378,0.00051163876,0.000022114704,0.0001274519,0.19789466,0.000040984727,0.00007807193,0.0026294743,0.7725214,0.000020917187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.889741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041782577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0150202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30315518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099145840","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000280","title":"Should International Relations Consider Rape a Weapon of War?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Power (physics); Political science; Software deployment; Criminology; Computer security; International relations; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.1011419913888959,"score_gpt":0.3766535844026077,"score_spread":0.2755115930137118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099145840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07509208,0.030316139,0.003543616,0.5361617,0.0034470432,0.00003637142,0.000037809616,0.000039383667,0.3513258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.931519,0.012103327,0.0005410682,0.04371159,0.0021247035,0.000026252126,0.000017708579,0.000023189414,0.009933188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940334,0.0038722148,0.00015100869,0.00036421703,0.0005387008,0.0010404823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932533,0.004060492,0.0010536143,0.0003835031,0.0005435855,0.00070556835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074084224,0.0003279546,0.00061488734,0.0012799278,0.0062006605,0.013026748,0.0010008757,0.008190718,0.005229975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013868656,0.00023310496,0.00039193546,0.0017313996,0.023272732,0.011397,0.00340701,0.006936286,0.0007289533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003270815,0.00005844136,0.005921479,0.0001752695,0.0000128000875,0.00047471927,0.077331685,0.00012332197,0.0002392821,0.874212,0.013027775,0.02839052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939332,0.0001298475,0.0074704867,0.0012957868,0.0000315626,0.0010289769,0.31865767,0.00019177591,0.00059806055,0.31794798,0.35256937,0.000059111517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00568083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063780625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013026748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035661417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004000723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03917998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105148358","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000264","title":"Risk Aversion, Gender, and Constitutional Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Referendum; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Principle of legality; Government (linguistics); Politics; Stateless protocol; Political economy; Law; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.25636984191858847,"score_gpt":0.3887635585048551,"score_spread":0.13239371658626664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105148358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66260546,0.002430647,0.0032100652,0.013090519,0.00010372698,0.000035124653,0.000071471855,0.000017070133,0.31843594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963652,0.00021876165,0.0001037808,0.00033376066,0.000017423386,0.0000052935698,0.000006945053,0.00000276974,0.002945988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850607,0.0007443332,0.000033500663,0.00017065366,0.00020466976,0.00034092687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680614,0.0015337141,0.0009018863,0.00016726855,0.00015732618,0.0004336277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030553697,0.00013914827,0.00016440744,0.00083131035,0.001609442,0.0031171266,0.00034905985,0.0008207013,0.007837306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006329654,0.0000752203,0.00016688001,0.000705763,0.0079844175,0.0014433064,0.0018940874,0.0011577009,0.00020284706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011497099,0.00022608505,0.042558756,0.00003799043,0.000028557746,0.00031498435,0.017715937,0.0006156153,0.0004646083,0.90383905,0.0021885359,0.03189493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061040926,0.00019713464,0.12156394,0.00019568372,0.000037612575,0.00037698128,0.045583412,0.0014127912,0.00070492347,0.73250526,0.097304314,0.000056798817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028449004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037963036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022085842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008046362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026218355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105488691","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x06060107","title":"Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Work (physics); International relations; Emulation; Sociology; Political economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04998125576071779,"score_gpt":0.34478460431928276,"score_spread":0.294803348558565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105488691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6822749,0.00217097,0.03549142,0.037141357,0.0004233616,0.00015429294,0.00012352657,0.00015240145,0.2420678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927981,0.00026532312,0.00158173,0.00070214213,0.000064314285,0.000043101016,0.000023626015,0.00003890523,0.0044829296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98238593,0.01189997,0.00041892283,0.0015087301,0.0024182908,0.0013682101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95737195,0.028830033,0.0048341597,0.004467941,0.0031789085,0.0013170675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02731076,0.00025989165,0.00047897978,0.0025809703,0.0043982062,0.009520277,0.0012447343,0.0024531551,0.006513233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07659792,0.00040704818,0.00041463735,0.0023376325,0.011955571,0.013369866,0.0075948494,0.003151649,0.0006494295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121807716,0.00006805921,0.016770445,0.00017097933,0.000030303137,0.00035612762,0.2896925,0.0006185308,0.002648997,0.5448265,0.004786982,0.1399088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047304176,0.00035442927,0.040069956,0.00072822726,0.000049094408,0.0004182507,0.25821808,0.0050505977,0.005244711,0.25910026,0.43055797,0.000161236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025878388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023734642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02731076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050728023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002365693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14443481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106885901","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000330","title":"Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Politics; Gender studies; Perception; Media coverage; Gender equality; Psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.12220079197973037,"score_gpt":0.38992136366105196,"score_spread":0.2677205716813216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106885901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7940345,0.058348775,0.0006466643,0.00624825,0.00031337858,0.000017856191,0.00027979838,0.0000066756043,0.14010404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834188,0.012626563,0.00016429723,0.0004121838,0.00021272413,0.000011750346,0.000076011325,0.00000526442,0.003072357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872094,0.00090187805,0.000022162269,0.00005871232,0.0001256535,0.00017074523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979164,0.0015404032,0.00021918183,0.000043859454,0.00014945307,0.00013085312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020750465,0.00018041927,0.00034334356,0.0030404504,0.0014454536,0.0024539314,0.0002543644,0.0007356755,0.0092109535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035862236,0.000117202646,0.000317072,0.0032350868,0.0016723799,0.002170145,0.0011033992,0.00048324687,0.00041702585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014481207,0.0006950114,0.32728127,0.0024027028,0.00036718673,0.0024757974,0.18592519,0.00037350587,0.0035319668,0.17645773,0.013057123,0.28598434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040815503,0.0010192278,0.620567,0.0012636995,0.00022560668,0.0016805957,0.22724494,0.00034247257,0.00094936683,0.01431073,0.13231005,0.000045412686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006688991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092109535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010560739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056537346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030813694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112203224","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000146","title":"The Victoria Schuck Award: A Sonata for Gender Politics Scholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Scholarship; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.18539212987691503,"score_gpt":0.3826757345871186,"score_spread":0.1972836047102036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112203224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013655269,0.03892472,0.0014365547,0.349635,0.2349907,0.00009102918,0.00027379973,0.00018316292,0.37309957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0098923,0.008427679,0.00087569485,0.022625752,0.019609721,0.00005013563,0.00014143287,0.00016198079,0.9382154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963833,0.00052915973,0.00011313404,0.00022940678,0.0022169894,0.00052798266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953311,0.0003927629,0.00014750607,0.00017977279,0.0016443451,0.0023045354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037996378,0.000533269,0.000496544,0.002176552,0.007407399,0.011348188,0.0011813962,0.004276456,0.06684221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933572,0.00040471117,0.00044956265,0.0018098466,0.0034101754,0.005336656,0.0053023347,0.006729224,0.022888534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000731669,0.000009973508,0.00009822437,0.000023903125,0.0000011273751,0.000030418512,0.00014686155,0.0000087397275,0.000043767956,0.026377337,0.95400023,0.019252056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001580522,0.0000030175454,0.00013865606,0.00003062565,5.5766515e-7,0.000018670344,0.0001441333,0.000010131285,0.0000161891,0.0019650708,0.99766856,0.0000027342878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020165019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059004243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06684221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008453161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2236095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116128980","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000134","title":"State Structures and The Politics of Child Care","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Child care; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.055069589736286804,"score_gpt":0.32688737208247115,"score_spread":0.27181778234618437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116128980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20170282,0.0058889687,0.0062811086,0.07616607,0.000199109,0.00003710816,0.0001132461,0.000038706785,0.70957285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897389,0.0009187187,0.00038723496,0.0012370708,0.00004980208,0.000019367784,0.000016436536,0.000010120136,0.007622459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704653,0.0015461713,0.00005459951,0.00029700264,0.00029369,0.000762049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984059,0.00087999785,0.00022732353,0.00016268839,0.00012388798,0.00020021132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033125866,0.00013957205,0.00019013011,0.00092012633,0.007439114,0.0075076995,0.0006276757,0.0022305027,0.006503742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004097325,0.00026793228,0.00028952086,0.0014198187,0.020492746,0.0032701243,0.0046964814,0.0029068193,0.00024399726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071141085,0.000004615987,0.001225388,0.0000058852343,0.000002577847,0.000024655896,0.0048189797,0.00020191791,0.000026473543,0.9898525,0.0009649051,0.0028650265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031451073,0.000027188336,0.010210645,0.00026144885,0.000026684036,0.000100950274,0.024307683,0.0014238469,0.00028242765,0.75937796,0.2039212,0.00002862648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03739594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051688228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03739594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014215909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047087343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10314411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117131052","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x13000536","title":"Peace Accords and the Adoption of Electoral Quotas for Women in the Developing World, 1990–2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Parliament; Democracy; Political science; Authoritarianism; Representation (politics); Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05648163916646806,"score_gpt":0.34752212669426114,"score_spread":0.2910404875277931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117131052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97792095,0.0026435605,0.00018975286,0.002836757,0.00012053618,0.000049557097,0.0025482636,0.0000080257005,0.013682548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917744,0.0024318187,0.00016283928,0.00023187565,0.000069448615,0.000047679376,0.0010776902,0.0000060781404,0.004198129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988784,0.0002653169,0.000116975534,0.00011665079,0.00019129807,0.00043128128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952845,0.0007285795,0.0030018934,0.000099107325,0.0005074795,0.0003784714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022799063,0.00020871287,0.00019151474,0.0013182014,0.0016102561,0.001521478,0.0004485013,0.00040738125,0.0037634394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008216273,0.00022210505,0.00016838906,0.0032178788,0.0012261985,0.0013025295,0.0016381354,0.0016641993,0.0005573653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005362398,0.0002639378,0.8089452,0.0004473526,0.000060409136,0.0006120516,0.08195863,0.00023997432,0.00063814316,0.010567434,0.01584469,0.079885945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008603641,0.000105817446,0.9464571,0.0001432419,0.000015941603,0.00018107575,0.01949965,0.00004902246,0.00036604967,0.0003069086,0.03285288,0.000013691111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05148776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12944068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05148776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023780705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015750846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1023761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124360880","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000062","title":"Confining Social Insecurity: Neoliberalism and the Rise of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century Debtors' Prison","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Prison; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Development economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.03590517751402692,"score_gpt":0.23603898802035247,"score_spread":0.20013381050632556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124360880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29292512,0.028282901,0.0019412199,0.3215243,0.0005442609,0.00001983985,0.00006653473,0.00002895681,0.35466692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857107,0.0023778481,0.0001587933,0.0046833684,0.00023106512,0.00000998457,0.0000054497164,0.000011925749,0.00681086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746907,0.0014786283,0.00004130888,0.00013322466,0.00024484048,0.00063298916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788207,0.0007981384,0.00038124307,0.0001385513,0.00017313067,0.00062685984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032520029,0.00023869208,0.00023944314,0.0012704954,0.007931373,0.010390299,0.00055556756,0.0023573325,0.0042577498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035627189,0.00019149958,0.0002084758,0.0011887017,0.051140808,0.00510495,0.0067460285,0.0041218735,0.00019518072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001660292,0.000017148766,0.0021267035,0.00001804894,0.000004284441,0.00012727127,0.025927825,0.00011160965,0.000046670917,0.9586989,0.006305864,0.0065989885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024087632,0.000034339246,0.011596561,0.00041287087,0.000004723598,0.00022130429,0.06692984,0.00034673655,0.00014567056,0.5745962,0.34565118,0.000036456597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013118474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026269782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013118474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012573097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047160434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09122461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125392551","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000342","title":"Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":609,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1468953851633293,"score_gpt":0.3777007126249193,"score_spread":0.23080532746158997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125392551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5832405,0.0048134024,0.0043434957,0.0146198375,0.00015721186,0.00006819896,0.00019305272,0.000023286259,0.39254105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891538,0.0013436071,0.00076286035,0.00041856468,0.000058217258,0.000040923474,0.00009339129,0.000022599097,0.008105905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593496,0.0023740355,0.0000912324,0.00036582406,0.0004544304,0.00077952235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962991,0.0023816647,0.00046809128,0.00024897367,0.0004417343,0.00016048341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047950214,0.00029316844,0.0006322595,0.0011293602,0.004727124,0.0037908687,0.0006925783,0.001074142,0.00508063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00872255,0.00023998161,0.00021319915,0.0026258894,0.005286115,0.0028998347,0.0026907811,0.0016813779,0.0002335746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038546335,0.00024609923,0.055996355,0.00035884927,0.000045244917,0.0024449853,0.24916947,0.00093499327,0.0014652099,0.5585143,0.011479531,0.11895951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010398703,0.0002994562,0.23674893,0.001261388,0.00007369953,0.00084086315,0.20648155,0.0038076234,0.0019062834,0.08241341,0.46598318,0.000079531645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104093395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10372056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104093395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008030252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002040564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20697504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136536380","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000469","title":"The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Politics; Feminism; Socioeconomic status; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Population; Law","score_opus":0.11108743685845206,"score_gpt":0.31517422751675034,"score_spread":0.20408679065829827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136536380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863897,0.00056652335,0.00006415083,0.0015844334,0.000021472779,0.000009599164,0.00023589027,0.0000036766753,0.011124522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981475,0.0003445865,0.000030187968,0.0001505016,0.0000043229256,0.0000049999353,0.00012640841,0.0000041222747,0.0011874837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970439,0.00045821382,0.000102235674,0.000204737,0.0012007154,0.0009901875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925619,0.0017116334,0.0010422885,0.00018346866,0.0026770507,0.0018236488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003734558,0.00017964441,0.00054414273,0.002584921,0.007467673,0.005332385,0.0008838864,0.0007405582,0.0034608503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009728613,0.0002186336,0.0003689475,0.0032673376,0.0050616786,0.0013080213,0.0025337238,0.0012776222,0.00016572734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026002512,0.00017773126,0.61998564,0.000081408245,0.00009385933,0.0002636249,0.33021167,0.0002991314,0.0005630529,0.009388383,0.00473157,0.033943847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008710448,0.000030732324,0.78279227,0.00012984405,0.00001767022,0.000045854395,0.20752612,0.00030667358,0.00013752154,0.0005820924,0.008374996,0.000047489248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99309546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031111816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031111816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038852356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22573304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140912625","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000279","title":"Judging Alone: Reflections on the Importance of Women on the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Law; Political science; Solitude; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09326621534670063,"score_gpt":0.3628824125046064,"score_spread":0.26961619715790575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140912625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053302374,0.019512758,0.0010727452,0.7260051,0.0049878797,0.00002068648,0.000044977412,0.000017627153,0.19503585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7814903,0.006942943,0.0003010051,0.16210967,0.00259822,0.00004607337,0.00001766123,0.000085038286,0.046408925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829244,0.011010723,0.0002532548,0.0012279472,0.0017395901,0.002844119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850331,0.011781063,0.00054518704,0.00027001396,0.0009707057,0.0013998052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015108588,0.0005957848,0.00067376497,0.001311784,0.038402054,0.020271115,0.0019657912,0.011559578,0.009230744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019676818,0.0005228579,0.0004178749,0.0014998657,0.07130853,0.016376013,0.008040071,0.019418404,0.0008792648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033775483,0.000027788996,0.0011784284,0.000071253286,0.000008073204,0.0009789768,0.41436383,0.00003459617,0.00027503766,0.47215,0.09917501,0.011703196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001468425,0.000025961286,0.00079914974,0.00040468707,0.0000063724524,0.00031760707,0.49412447,0.000038135084,0.00024382258,0.038499817,0.46549603,0.000029301205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06825655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11170053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06825655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013751229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009689885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13571852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141895619","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000079","title":"Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing “Flexible” Voters in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Voting; Incentive; Politics; Consciousness; Political science; Proportional representation; Style (visual arts); Social psychology; General election; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.10717869931512064,"score_gpt":0.33838170385092253,"score_spread":0.2312030045358019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141895619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99603206,0.00007150009,0.00006987258,0.00015549142,0.000004101203,0.0000204852,0.0003657073,0.0000036572749,0.0032770867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977112,0.000054177497,0.00010577215,0.00003390842,0.0000015062083,0.000009636393,0.00029625915,0.000003878978,0.0017836341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714214,0.0004672572,0.0000783021,0.0003312399,0.00073216134,0.0012489185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513924,0.00077059964,0.0006883401,0.00025054798,0.0019733787,0.0011779221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001981747,0.00023224133,0.000569261,0.0018600435,0.007560915,0.0018416404,0.0010193721,0.00052744447,0.003933746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070259995,0.0002415078,0.0004149978,0.0037260766,0.0021841335,0.00054334616,0.0017887802,0.0007459888,0.0002965262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000447678,0.00009514704,0.9646217,0.00003811361,0.000059473285,0.00016771028,0.013962575,0.0006008402,0.00055809994,0.003227071,0.0024436193,0.013778004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018599956,0.0000469288,0.9830703,0.000017429487,0.000022820244,0.00003146345,0.011870067,0.0010016161,0.00029123822,0.00018703098,0.0034160758,0.000026351898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99554425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050394136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050394136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03374124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3656367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149786024","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000323","title":"Feminist and Gender-Neutral Frames in Contemporary Child-Care and Anti-Violence Policy Debates in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political science; State (computer science); Public policy; Perspective (graphical); Welfare state; Social policy; Gender studies; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06892212517497541,"score_gpt":0.36852191470095075,"score_spread":0.2995997895259753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149786024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16162811,0.040324815,0.0017898781,0.47660998,0.001544532,0.000084111205,0.00048642076,0.000072153896,0.31746003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90323013,0.011521685,0.0012962484,0.03738456,0.00025553358,0.00005502085,0.00008968918,0.00008434249,0.04608285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971725,0.0018578019,0.00017635975,0.0008748657,0.0031970786,0.00417661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924759,0.002250296,0.00039962097,0.0001277026,0.0025478338,0.0021985162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007830401,0.00048838777,0.00082175113,0.0028749781,0.049260378,0.016359769,0.0032600302,0.006897992,0.00741368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01128975,0.00060578727,0.00052400166,0.005700635,0.030802058,0.0029280025,0.005461657,0.008654031,0.00026277793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007705291,0.00003737694,0.004243412,0.0001946326,0.000023642799,0.00049737754,0.07609955,0.0007869359,0.00044655637,0.8431569,0.04641021,0.028026454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005463943,0.000032124113,0.021386778,0.0011698687,0.000057811547,0.00014670516,0.14030367,0.0012440095,0.00082013063,0.057259142,0.77730924,0.00021590786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40057227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.40057227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35685617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160280749","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000073","title":"Global Householding amid Global Crises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Pooling; Sociocultural evolution; Politics; Order (exchange); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Unit (ring theory); Reproduction; Sociology; Political economy; Economy; Geography; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05282907680598626,"score_gpt":0.33829756087689744,"score_spread":0.2854684840709112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160280749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21617235,0.018930288,0.0063375668,0.07402861,0.0014723251,0.00005133837,0.00037556648,0.000156169,0.6824758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641756,0.0055001304,0.0009134294,0.0047513237,0.00056931964,0.000038149643,0.00010158192,0.00006970081,0.023880782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.0003049184,0.000019216395,0.00013817279,0.000080235564,0.0002826046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994473,0.0001518207,0.0000764402,0.00011630399,0.0000687423,0.00013934707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013634365,0.00031596873,0.00035807787,0.0006238504,0.0032295529,0.003667615,0.00034206655,0.0014169761,0.010700636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016949219,0.000112074864,0.00019206225,0.0012574219,0.00874045,0.00740626,0.0055308985,0.0018373075,0.00061329856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046967078,0.000009886137,0.0023523944,0.000079467085,0.000009020963,0.00055726746,0.039598536,0.00026363245,0.00039437233,0.9005575,0.022438917,0.03369201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066166554,0.000030601142,0.008872169,0.00016230746,0.000007653118,0.00040821568,0.04467403,0.00022248235,0.00023816527,0.24016601,0.70519537,0.000016391486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026052387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035366712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010700636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025740282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009203903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03579724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165081973","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000110","title":"Gender Policy and State Architecture in Latin America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Decentralization; Authoritarianism; Legislature; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Democracy; Power (physics); Affect (linguistics); Political economy; State (computer science); Development economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09272889638088903,"score_gpt":0.34967143058576716,"score_spread":0.2569425342048781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165081973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6084413,0.0045901146,0.0024231886,0.021282557,0.00011682354,0.000048139278,0.0002908883,0.00009174335,0.36271524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869392,0.0007426695,0.0003156735,0.00054072915,0.000025656476,0.000026445214,0.0000659567,0.000013222929,0.011330364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999263,0.00026799968,0.000017966388,0.0000767485,0.00007101759,0.00030327015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996019,0.00011009375,0.000083192484,0.000030668267,0.00009234125,0.00008183416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001555042,0.00009756522,0.00014486196,0.0009906731,0.0020522214,0.0033568367,0.000373791,0.0004988299,0.007217858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019380638,0.00011759738,0.00018333022,0.0013993524,0.0026665346,0.0009017509,0.0019809061,0.00059789955,0.00018384415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011673452,0.000055939265,0.04514279,0.0001246024,0.000033700595,0.00022557718,0.014718763,0.0022319695,0.0011210816,0.8722709,0.005241824,0.058716126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008970518,0.00013968916,0.20955274,0.0006287856,0.00007845056,0.00011797035,0.040378492,0.0029453097,0.0011924144,0.1871231,0.557696,0.00005734401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059961446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07912195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059961446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009381005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042280746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11922485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171312640","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x14000646","title":"Party Quotas and Rising Women Politicians in Singapore","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.12216024532661057,"score_gpt":0.37386820027025575,"score_spread":0.2517079549436452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171312640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90034723,0.00090691325,0.00028857464,0.010812608,0.00014588982,0.000016692766,0.00008552456,0.000016699978,0.08737985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123454,0.00027191895,0.000055766875,0.00050821743,0.000031664928,0.000009488795,0.00003642328,0.0000075957196,0.007844342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956741,0.0024270818,0.00014676648,0.00022145803,0.00052362727,0.0010069077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978497,0.0005338377,0.0005923641,0.00010442066,0.00022905288,0.0006905382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005120631,0.00013702916,0.00029020512,0.0010436454,0.005257746,0.0040763835,0.00040391236,0.0009364367,0.0114100315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004275542,0.0002552134,0.00025254284,0.002099754,0.0029702939,0.0024682095,0.0042896722,0.0013493539,0.000906605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073103164,0.00037732508,0.25813863,0.00042671373,0.00007266424,0.003112138,0.2696571,0.00045440125,0.0033226926,0.25030866,0.038666323,0.17473222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005483517,0.00047747535,0.43198577,0.00037928933,0.000040514748,0.0008548273,0.25011557,0.0010524057,0.0020087324,0.016050212,0.2969054,0.00007503897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015940344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03526974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015940344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035780647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023924923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038170338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219979124","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000446","title":"Gender and the Executive Branch","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Executive branch; Legislation; Public administration; Legislature; Law; History","score_opus":0.11354588238310358,"score_gpt":0.36542897716055295,"score_spread":0.25188309477744936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219979124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03062395,0.02400319,0.00085105107,0.112038635,0.006569001,0.00001935005,0.00019264346,0.00004922784,0.825653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5899056,0.013741576,0.0003924137,0.06489116,0.0061860755,0.000053603537,0.00015650086,0.00014191642,0.32453108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696404,0.0010391355,0.000068992755,0.00026571128,0.0005482507,0.0011138447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955902,0.0016118265,0.0004955614,0.00019010983,0.00061620935,0.0014962041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033082142,0.00032486976,0.0002679397,0.0010237137,0.0054817097,0.0078749,0.00064444984,0.0020243283,0.03255384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007363929,0.00017138875,0.00025100532,0.0015060897,0.005305419,0.005169648,0.0021810709,0.0033282845,0.0055358945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066788096,0.00003183589,0.0037566603,0.00007273352,0.0000053487142,0.00023071894,0.011621754,0.00003480795,0.00017721075,0.7217647,0.1998294,0.06240814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010323893,0.0000313589,0.0035750696,0.00024705942,0.0000030501367,0.00016864015,0.004608153,0.000026513228,0.000108884866,0.031539164,0.9596722,0.000009563477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00509584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008965943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03255384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038341586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034670543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10890347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313820225","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000092","title":"Gender and State Architectures: The Impact of Governance Structures on Women's Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scholarship; Ideology; Politics; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Power (physics); Unitary state; Political economy; Opportunity structures; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06223646900126362,"score_gpt":0.3417709901097295,"score_spread":0.2795345211084659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313820225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49100807,0.005067525,0.0037476236,0.027691256,0.00037978194,0.000019200443,0.000108511216,0.000016152086,0.47196183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875558,0.0011238942,0.00020134762,0.00078604475,0.000076671284,0.000011158922,0.000014876694,0.000015355241,0.010214822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981048,0.0011735602,0.000022562832,0.00015793521,0.00020877969,0.0003322022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741733,0.0017932402,0.0003094471,0.00008804744,0.00013447582,0.00025737283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002605784,0.00022026252,0.0001929786,0.00077118626,0.0031276809,0.00507332,0.00038563396,0.00072592456,0.011050717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035161918,0.000110485635,0.00017017248,0.0010003714,0.00931135,0.0032048877,0.0028634653,0.0010303329,0.0005745219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011183947,0.00007807348,0.023717046,0.00009997842,0.000015470576,0.00030015575,0.2645282,0.00020217722,0.0007787598,0.6462349,0.007412533,0.056520928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003323701,0.00017638043,0.058691997,0.00062882045,0.000028637673,0.00032951875,0.40536356,0.00044799075,0.0013402835,0.17098263,0.36193907,0.00003786707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033762208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005986703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011050717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021743889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013536924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03696835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321510021","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x14000622","title":"Introduction: Quotas and Non-Quota Strategies in East Asia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Politics; Convergence (economics); Norm (philosophy); Representation (politics); Ethos; East Asia; Development economics; Economic growth; Political economy; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07700584714882344,"score_gpt":0.35195177218546203,"score_spread":0.2749459250366386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321510021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39217693,0.02047312,0.009938523,0.016908003,0.00053015235,0.00007725247,0.00020010152,0.000043595814,0.55965227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720272,0.0052877385,0.0011344001,0.0011570301,0.00017415397,0.00004262124,0.000049315393,0.000018803947,0.020108778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999204,0.0004323364,0.000046366713,0.0001023108,0.00011719749,0.00009782313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885404,0.00058230304,0.0002686668,0.000096159194,0.00012518236,0.00007376734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018391948,0.0001689051,0.0001422976,0.0005614268,0.001550884,0.0026040608,0.00039352322,0.0005054231,0.0056017647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017489044,0.00011840505,0.0001737097,0.0015531242,0.0035467176,0.0034399948,0.001488948,0.0010410591,0.00041639965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007900428,0.000063312735,0.012979285,0.00056882866,0.000014055945,0.00040720415,0.065745495,0.00034704202,0.0008059025,0.82356447,0.0072616045,0.088163756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021099113,0.00031162146,0.075664654,0.0017629944,0.00004640373,0.0010012558,0.07336737,0.0012641185,0.0040475307,0.13096084,0.7115006,0.000051597257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018095132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022640948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056017647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015871094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001281806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01873976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323919086","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x1200075x","title":"The Retelling of Tales: Disentangling the Feminist Evolutionary Analytic Approach, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Phenomenon; Pluralism (philosophy); Dominance (genetics); Plural; Inequality; Legal pluralism; Gender inequality; Sociology; Criminology; Family law; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Epistemology; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.06978202686042317,"score_gpt":0.31962316735826934,"score_spread":0.24984114049784617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323919086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13378374,0.04624296,0.05614358,0.5578558,0.0033789417,0.00005898472,0.00014377487,0.000092966235,0.20229928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95325494,0.007811371,0.007242328,0.018624812,0.0021331783,0.00007563589,0.00003326727,0.00014909358,0.010675352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930098,0.00580064,0.00006652119,0.00036358635,0.00041997482,0.0003395152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741424,0.02289931,0.0007717509,0.0010043706,0.00067371404,0.00050839595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014023168,0.0008019208,0.00072646054,0.0039617773,0.00778977,0.010670945,0.0022679057,0.0027316618,0.0038429054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017341765,0.00032900527,0.00046381186,0.0021412075,0.08505521,0.018549273,0.008066554,0.0066669327,0.00033736424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018826313,0.000016872289,0.00089192926,0.00006917223,0.000018819492,0.00023512756,0.079381265,0.00021986976,0.000109184526,0.9007232,0.004937248,0.013378475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070195974,0.000014539328,0.0009850214,0.00027438934,0.000010098711,0.00013808443,0.080927305,0.0006733078,0.00020878957,0.82892287,0.08781978,0.00001893066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00649871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010492477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014023168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00455227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019091661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07416248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328460664","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x1000036x","title":"Analyzing Institutional Persistence: The Case of the Ministry of Women's Affairs in Aotearoa/New Zealand","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Christian ministry; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political science; Restructuring; Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04091293366167028,"score_gpt":0.31795573353379963,"score_spread":0.2770427998721294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328460664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410707,0.0005306982,0.000635685,0.00585926,0.000025209281,0.000090381975,0.00008626463,0.000007562683,0.05169436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933821,0.00034300235,0.00025632157,0.00023925975,0.0000094242705,0.00003247978,0.00003583361,0.000008679908,0.005692901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963421,0.0010405247,0.00009191486,0.00026521322,0.00045660057,0.0018036716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575126,0.0014524095,0.0011808057,0.0002094321,0.00053641765,0.0008695662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041504023,0.00021347965,0.00051774306,0.0020627878,0.012634289,0.0077513657,0.0018065235,0.0015987455,0.006122372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008136845,0.00052242744,0.00037365686,0.00385313,0.017222064,0.0045695286,0.006301748,0.002570785,0.00019879056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013394872,0.00011225249,0.07052593,0.0002292048,0.000040029132,0.008307616,0.72917295,0.00080328895,0.0012406647,0.16136718,0.0038487327,0.024218237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025931391,0.00006074918,0.09323213,0.0002527634,0.000032431464,0.0004379638,0.8327252,0.0006165587,0.00028032679,0.0055803233,0.06671939,0.00003624563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69453526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8380433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69453526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04682818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02255544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61452734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336403513","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000155","title":"Julia Gillard and the Gender Wars","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Metaphor; Newspaper; Gender studies; Power (physics); Allegory; Political science; Prime minister; Sociology; Law; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0624751045624428,"score_gpt":0.3223703708744206,"score_spread":0.2598952663119778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336403513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19365157,0.047282252,0.0014223434,0.27699932,0.0024610837,0.00003116473,0.00008134719,0.00008555223,0.47798532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059698,0.00815451,0.00045920126,0.017565036,0.00087092724,0.000032252243,0.000012120456,0.000054955282,0.066881284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.0009932022,0.00001404625,0.00010680693,0.00022261112,0.00014637854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794966,0.0014816026,0.0002157072,0.00005611159,0.00012858213,0.00016832666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013694435,0.00036447053,0.00017415632,0.0012692702,0.0075089536,0.005354563,0.00038401867,0.002013929,0.0031152526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003229986,0.0002539159,0.00013536967,0.0007370734,0.009294939,0.0031500629,0.002738964,0.0026850381,0.00052954006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048317095,0.000037955746,0.0022804157,0.00017172449,0.000012010364,0.0007965462,0.47411495,0.00009716226,0.00097470894,0.39928934,0.0977222,0.02445463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004695642,0.000034067452,0.0037132006,0.00024755293,0.000008362796,0.00048009443,0.093934126,0.00013338112,0.0007030719,0.026456485,0.8742612,0.000023785136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017197851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025896316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017197851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034342208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013074335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034195483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345965789","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000131","title":"Do Women and Men Respond Differently to Negative News?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Skin conductance; Arousal; Neuropsychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Cognition; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.11243303950275291,"score_gpt":0.4246122158380769,"score_spread":0.312179176335324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345965789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909648,0.0019144737,0.00016608706,0.0010916726,0.00015119977,0.000017337543,0.00015705278,0.0000050253147,0.0055323537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968803,0.0008143696,0.000065387336,0.0007215022,0.000106635016,0.000012949515,0.00006314501,0.0000038271537,0.0013319282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996828,0.00011265596,0.000019828563,0.00006845191,0.000056944988,0.000059408674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988626,0.00051903736,0.00034635953,0.000047299156,0.00007069909,0.00015388956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008779793,0.00020215816,0.0003211535,0.0005955157,0.0003240578,0.00088849297,0.00012391279,0.00051143265,0.0044088094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042557567,0.00019511521,0.00016940024,0.00030952148,0.0005515726,0.0006774311,0.00025397955,0.00029482666,0.00078800786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028139215,0.0004039295,0.88549215,0.000272822,0.00031477478,0.00086070766,0.017256528,0.00004230838,0.008158553,0.00092293305,0.0017812308,0.081680186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037753605,0.00054052804,0.98385876,0.00004195187,0.0000747294,0.000660401,0.010622081,0.000057433732,0.0005797208,0.00065939286,0.0028491125,0.000018168026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001113611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014709164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044088094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001222388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010556367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014748931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404729571","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000234","title":"Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Political science; Variation (astronomy); News media; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.05281048631499318,"score_gpt":0.3021888606153184,"score_spread":0.24937837430032522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404729571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872503,0.00054309244,0.000049851176,0.00045262647,0.00002144496,0.0000057922234,0.0011023933,0.0000045084676,0.010569948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974534,0.0005420169,0.00005559568,0.00007194073,0.000057434812,0.0000075372,0.00042012575,0.000004125962,0.0013878443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951744,0.0001704792,0.000037263417,0.00005304449,0.00011481104,0.00010691252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957064,0.0014693686,0.0019468534,0.000105188396,0.00045394455,0.0003183256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006378052,0.000119402815,0.00019658935,0.0034481187,0.0006422392,0.0012238759,0.0001398806,0.0002113158,0.003647165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040233606,0.0001033551,0.00011683397,0.003009519,0.00036479297,0.0006348605,0.0006022889,0.0003258301,0.0003726155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023273607,0.000069338814,0.92135215,0.00018082531,0.00008375416,0.00041132164,0.031750906,0.00010610554,0.0017958443,0.0015266795,0.004227239,0.038263038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027355509,0.00002927445,0.9711779,0.00007741855,0.00001911157,0.00015592141,0.019834759,0.00013299109,0.00039238657,0.00008061042,0.008086894,0.000009983667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021164611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043817647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021164611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005813642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022861565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042082787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405550332","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000039","title":"Context and Media Frames: The Case of Liberia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Presidential system; Context (archaeology); Political science; Media coverage; Gender studies; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06555992134806152,"score_gpt":0.3487911517612996,"score_spread":0.28323123041323806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405550332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124987,0.0043213,0.00028503884,0.009754056,0.0001450701,0.00004992243,0.00009589645,0.000010326095,0.17283973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870402,0.0014414649,0.00022433231,0.0012504236,0.000033226188,0.00003066573,0.000043781674,0.0000101046,0.009925773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.00034137515,0.000028545113,0.00006687448,0.00006139294,0.00041615186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.0004644294,0.0001848311,0.000040893414,0.00005944614,0.00014715221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013609702,0.00028090322,0.00029847305,0.0012209598,0.010913959,0.007520145,0.00068647164,0.0011224395,0.00870224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018385113,0.00027670898,0.0002167002,0.0017579491,0.004981017,0.0039038162,0.0069938535,0.0025515107,0.0006434476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015473299,0.00011252588,0.022794833,0.00024293052,0.00002605776,0.010179352,0.84450346,0.000078271856,0.0010362654,0.0843673,0.0046978393,0.031806424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042107233,0.00007107064,0.03046273,0.000857909,0.000049397655,0.0011754177,0.7913879,0.0001755881,0.00070448767,0.0045845145,0.17046455,0.000024496347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059734687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105447814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059734687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009454684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027587884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2444597018","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000574","title":"Women on Corporate Boards: A Comparison of Parliamentary Discourse in the United Kingdom and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Kingdom; Directive; Gender balance; Commission; Corporate law; European commission; Corporate governance; Political economy; Public administration; Accounting; Law; Business; European union; Sociology; Gender studies; International trade","score_opus":0.2865987547184954,"score_gpt":0.3753449196243615,"score_spread":0.08874616490586612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2444597018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8671642,0.014762772,0.00042422328,0.02174623,0.00033525014,0.000035167017,0.00017873867,0.000029000437,0.0953244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98841804,0.0018273416,0.00008848442,0.002074855,0.00007472384,0.00002075562,0.0000680811,0.000028222988,0.0073995763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759519,0.014137877,0.0009586326,0.0012445527,0.0044236495,0.0032832886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719545,0.018395407,0.003929383,0.00043080372,0.0034332892,0.0018566179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011449184,0.0005163818,0.00083857693,0.0066163708,0.014737182,0.014207392,0.0011311646,0.004013321,0.006606881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028586015,0.00042864154,0.00049640605,0.005630986,0.011133803,0.0044319048,0.005993321,0.0027537567,0.0006816552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012175323,0.000031432483,0.011427645,0.00019346135,0.000025099982,0.0005393588,0.9527467,0.000050822546,0.0006089758,0.018687392,0.0033592198,0.012208176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013392583,0.00006838433,0.06057702,0.000650982,0.000019968178,0.00022978992,0.7616271,0.00006351009,0.00036683018,0.00066040765,0.1756622,0.000060339695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24742699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25739598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24742699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033582773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008274603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49197358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475171680","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000477","title":"Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Beijing; China; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Developing country; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0776937338099527,"score_gpt":0.3379499118446452,"score_spread":0.2602561780346925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475171680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99534446,0.00011808107,0.00033445313,0.00021181848,0.0000037039727,0.000009085987,0.00008085041,0.0000028297015,0.0038947512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994659,0.00008071734,0.00006224553,0.000013222932,0.000002175479,0.0000056145063,0.000031369455,0.0000010892555,0.0003376032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993001,0.00037031446,0.000024917801,0.00008885135,0.00006371667,0.0001520119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977849,0.0010180705,0.00087923254,0.00008989792,0.00009779335,0.00013018418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991572,0.000117166106,0.00017808969,0.0009271615,0.00069052534,0.0016365937,0.00021419305,0.0002513504,0.002835428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004481142,0.00016247034,0.00019192112,0.0012966513,0.0010433631,0.0013974241,0.0012441688,0.00050601456,0.00013979328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015055029,0.00011689598,0.92206407,0.000058388858,0.00006122537,0.00029835064,0.033220407,0.0012615758,0.0004435566,0.009167758,0.0007302144,0.03242703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067743804,0.000102670514,0.94807327,0.00004903275,0.000027865959,0.00007023858,0.04075534,0.002567783,0.0004002364,0.0026674247,0.0052616405,0.00001772789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013961341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022248205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013961341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011869508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005480037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027760148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535741930","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000544","title":"Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype threat; Politics; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Anxiety; Identity (music); Political psychology; Order (exchange); Cognition; Political science; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11781557245917168,"score_gpt":0.3780742860863044,"score_spread":0.2602587136271327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535741930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997866,0.000009592606,0.00014498812,0.00012041151,0.000029167557,0.00012351245,0.000028192248,0.000006186475,0.0016720489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936254,0.000046979327,0.0012147529,0.00037786967,0.000035195488,0.00053848146,0.000056426077,0.000009914287,0.0040949243],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882215,0.00046585262,0.00009922823,0.00023349845,0.00017138234,0.0002080045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140537,0.005745874,0.00074307824,0.00063488516,0.00017870004,0.0012921997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026140646,0.00045024735,0.00066090334,0.00028428558,0.0014285437,0.001471994,0.00080263213,0.0014865282,0.010604811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046213665,0.00046327122,0.00025753846,0.00019744654,0.0012758754,0.0009023869,0.00088002166,0.0022539727,0.0008825366],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08672076,0.36631778,0.09916188,0.0007224752,0.00018533405,0.0019234658,0.034994133,0.00086587,0.33843568,0.010144913,0.003001228,0.057526473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015901629,0.4524515,0.39480215,0.00020208892,0.0004686531,0.0009022788,0.026973775,0.01343743,0.061550524,0.015655534,0.01717073,0.0004837968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008226046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015334476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010604811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039281056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007559983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035476565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571847123","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000684","title":"Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Western University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Electoral system; Parliament; Legislature; Voting; Proportional representation; Representation (politics); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Politics; Communication; Democracy","score_opus":0.09256334293386646,"score_gpt":0.3913990247997294,"score_spread":0.2988356818658629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571847123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99235827,0.00007951601,0.000095259194,0.00021851614,0.000008487987,0.0000062540066,0.000074233445,0.0000023658072,0.0071570394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890924,0.000017915909,0.000036558526,0.00002166015,0.000008761713,0.0000038154776,0.00004436967,0.0000012954165,0.00095632195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887115,0.0006112987,0.000056493773,0.00012801708,0.00014060248,0.00019247444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954716,0.0017608564,0.0017727107,0.0002351341,0.00024126057,0.0005185014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001440392,0.000117431984,0.00019083993,0.00072434894,0.0005855433,0.001185084,0.00023665174,0.00047131968,0.0104329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008091032,0.00008920776,0.000194859,0.00057539163,0.000564675,0.00050961704,0.0007579564,0.00033392024,0.0009396963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015170709,0.0002717871,0.9514231,0.0000508371,0.00007700531,0.00012263401,0.0040837424,0.00022758395,0.0028223663,0.0028486669,0.0011776116,0.035377644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029096156,0.00023880233,0.99040365,0.00001813113,0.000021783764,0.000118592085,0.004643013,0.000308389,0.000526864,0.0007334055,0.0029475724,0.000010676076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013964988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030464472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028931364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015619161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0349015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606211833","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000173","title":"Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 304 pp. $100 (hardcover).","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08370536329733332,"score_gpt":0.32016864893233277,"score_spread":0.23646328563499946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606211833","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001019267,0.8873106,0.00070493174,0.016815992,0.0049457056,0.00001398637,0.00029375462,0.00005217194,0.08884364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0533552,0.74330944,0.0017400417,0.0045942953,0.0063601597,0.00013088189,0.0004376715,0.00019573096,0.18987657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993561,0.00029255677,0.000035965284,0.000080476595,0.00016256984,0.00007222556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915326,0.0004502288,0.000105899475,0.000058140406,0.00014949581,0.00008303311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010290345,0.0015433664,0.0010797956,0.0017950698,0.0017458535,0.004366323,0.0010433631,0.0017539674,0.030385116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027471492,0.0010229128,0.00052158383,0.0025880323,0.004230083,0.004123522,0.0019747005,0.0024818825,0.0068775476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055840515,0.000038699553,0.00043930512,0.0011338687,0.000026999054,0.00018324825,0.005491338,0.00019065743,0.0002703943,0.09191436,0.76715076,0.13310449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007878753,0.000011854861,0.0015552829,0.0017669313,0.000011434736,0.00033501312,0.0024456508,0.00007308143,0.00013174168,0.039938636,0.9537064,0.00001612375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012431698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026038438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030385116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026727174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10164833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606229170","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000392","title":"Resisting Parity: Gender and Cabinet Appointments in Chile and Spain","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parity (physics); Dominance (genetics); Status quo; Politics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.1344248107729453,"score_gpt":0.3656062068777426,"score_spread":0.2311813961047973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606229170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796195,0.00056156045,0.000102309205,0.0034592496,0.000045834557,0.000016527309,0.000131608,0.0000060688476,0.016057447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908618,0.00020848462,0.000036561076,0.0002572544,0.000017742854,0.000010113922,0.000070915456,0.00000784739,0.008529364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987043,0.000387223,0.000031347376,0.00010839486,0.000109934386,0.00065888895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784815,0.0008340433,0.00046486827,0.000078426914,0.00025913425,0.00051545317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024982018,0.00013136808,0.00045313447,0.0008284023,0.002628067,0.0036233515,0.0009710472,0.0010851661,0.010879993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054756175,0.0001731425,0.00019449557,0.0010912301,0.002200469,0.0012330783,0.0024790636,0.001574655,0.0006850619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002488966,0.0018256162,0.48969057,0.0004503071,0.000077746336,0.0039854846,0.30984825,0.0006334183,0.0015814414,0.045581892,0.022759637,0.12107671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014909818,0.00019676775,0.4165398,0.00033536088,0.000021632493,0.00030857202,0.511056,0.0007374518,0.00025751835,0.004166217,0.06617861,0.000052984833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11246235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18085267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11246235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056411275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003526909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22361547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771049538","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000484","title":"From the Colonial to Feminist IR: Feminist IR Studies, the Wider FSS/GPE Research Agenda, and the Questions of Value, Valuation, Security, and Violence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Valuation (finance); Constitution; Politics; Commodification; Feminist theory; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.21012639053930657,"score_gpt":0.46822523733412946,"score_spread":0.25809884679482287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771049538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032220546,0.08765776,0.0045531397,0.55280733,0.001991679,0.000026043153,0.00012569247,0.000031807504,0.320586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88182074,0.028386995,0.0018486924,0.04967006,0.002726324,0.00010546877,0.0000624675,0.00012550743,0.035253663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148643,0.0068827677,0.00009284441,0.00043580984,0.00056341273,0.00053861697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98927444,0.008960917,0.00036941722,0.00046234523,0.00045399935,0.00047885533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011244183,0.0005303561,0.00045344973,0.0022128946,0.0117889205,0.014309072,0.0010137748,0.0036408524,0.009343404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009316427,0.0003111974,0.00029219766,0.0022910621,0.05971743,0.015271206,0.005115265,0.009696917,0.0006870214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145172835,0.000015829817,0.00049924874,0.000103597544,0.0000031781397,0.000067680696,0.061179463,0.000048691894,0.000059719005,0.9013924,0.019462718,0.017152969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009650927,0.000020482497,0.0017026908,0.0015241228,0.000004759265,0.00018634423,0.13158165,0.00015424924,0.0002673306,0.22460398,0.6399265,0.000018257773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015221187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019574476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015221187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012185601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050706924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08841318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784324061","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000526","title":"Stories from the Front Lines: Making Sense of Gender Mainstreaming in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender mainstreaming; Mainstreaming; Narrative; Technocracy; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Resistance (ecology); Work (physics); Mainstream; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Gender equality; Engineering","score_opus":0.08222544578080214,"score_gpt":0.34492011597450445,"score_spread":0.2626946701937023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784324061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75156575,0.0041204323,0.004396718,0.10227933,0.0008658741,0.00022357226,0.0008025045,0.00016529737,0.13558063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97550225,0.0016367869,0.0009962099,0.00410293,0.000059606566,0.00006948633,0.00014230283,0.00011464982,0.017375818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866079,0.0055398834,0.0002469889,0.00093986496,0.0026735007,0.0039919126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859309,0.005712854,0.0008713393,0.0004733542,0.002820096,0.0041913725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074966433,0.0012209523,0.00086807203,0.0027157292,0.0702924,0.0170041,0.0047369134,0.0045485483,0.005807992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015516026,0.0008415932,0.0005903072,0.0045695007,0.032395404,0.0067484537,0.012023738,0.009894321,0.00048574051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019851732,0.0000129986865,0.0016926158,0.00004579899,0.0000045083116,0.0007861065,0.97747964,0.000079550555,0.00020432076,0.008247625,0.006263557,0.005163344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019115882,0.0000069704483,0.0011857048,0.000090709524,0.0000055777255,0.00011576449,0.9296061,0.00014288737,0.0001620436,0.0009893117,0.06766835,0.000024673624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96924603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14296629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14296629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12912121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792270211","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000319","title":"Women and the Orange Order: Female Activism, Diaspora and Empire in the British World, 1850–1940. By D. A. J. MacPherson. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016. 230 pp. $110.00 (hardback).","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Empire; Orange (colour); Order (exchange); Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Gender studies; Ancient history; Chemistry; Economics","score_opus":0.03390466658801979,"score_gpt":0.2667766484633348,"score_spread":0.23287198187531502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792270211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006123956,0.9358076,0.00007833973,0.02049807,0.0014530607,0.00000789441,0.0003158249,0.00001835173,0.035696898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16914226,0.68395483,0.00033853788,0.004333725,0.0029798243,0.000034899622,0.0004551947,0.000049153503,0.13871168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995136,0.00016002596,0.000026762234,0.00006075169,0.00013654851,0.00010222652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955505,0.00018634525,0.00007420358,0.000015302787,0.000055058917,0.000113951195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000758593,0.0007966305,0.0004111422,0.0017385705,0.0021314004,0.0029254411,0.0004581017,0.0012019005,0.016961036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009848948,0.0006036869,0.00021330753,0.0051087947,0.0046827267,0.003075323,0.001430363,0.0012775809,0.002487611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014770792,0.00003397541,0.005017126,0.0016882921,0.000028860115,0.00028368967,0.049345836,0.0001303744,0.0003881326,0.0359604,0.65720075,0.24977489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059745007,0.000026793354,0.024676342,0.0020319892,0.000011092596,0.00017382248,0.020237941,0.000019361132,0.000060355742,0.0035187341,0.94922155,0.000015984782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2457105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56967765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2457105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072481674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030591849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48856062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795541401","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000016","title":"She's Married, She's Faithful, She's Dying: Politicizing the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Political science; Mandate; Public administration; Law; Politics; Ideology","score_opus":0.06444925298124908,"score_gpt":0.35295924183396243,"score_spread":0.28850998885271334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795541401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17772132,0.01197921,0.0011963872,0.57828885,0.003917393,0.000033647233,0.00002647841,0.000024564359,0.22681221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8710213,0.0057553276,0.00045253642,0.087947786,0.0013693059,0.000027377331,0.000009709008,0.000038009224,0.03337871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627846,0.0024786866,0.000031515352,0.00012280063,0.0002706998,0.0008178391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998447,0.0009206425,0.00011693371,0.000023955501,0.0001001764,0.0003913751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044905134,0.00020742099,0.00014078882,0.00044642642,0.020486804,0.0070454907,0.0004330127,0.0037515603,0.004865981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040107258,0.00022966541,0.00017031566,0.00041966935,0.011040628,0.0032550136,0.0031451792,0.006147317,0.00051119574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052174597,0.00009406872,0.0051654577,0.00008299097,0.000011244897,0.00081851374,0.13304669,0.00015660793,0.0008005623,0.66005224,0.15608846,0.043630943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015518131,0.00008174911,0.007589964,0.0002741214,0.000009851477,0.00024628508,0.23612654,0.00020256499,0.0005278389,0.04222361,0.71266556,0.00003640449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015758121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05080467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020486804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047999774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058133393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034826458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902393081","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000752","title":"Trump in Transnational Perspective: Insights from Global LGBT Politics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democratization; Queer; Lesbian; Transgender; Opposition (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.05249310714694997,"score_gpt":0.3729083599349547,"score_spread":0.3204152527880047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902393081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28618646,0.007362265,0.003922043,0.07357231,0.0005196873,0.000037541606,0.000106546504,0.00003539484,0.62825775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98250026,0.0036507961,0.0005368291,0.0042068423,0.0001810097,0.00004230696,0.00004042815,0.000042738968,0.008798709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737084,0.0020143953,0.000022298642,0.00011237034,0.00015345223,0.00032656523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774545,0.0016558887,0.00013471712,0.00009911597,0.00014731676,0.00021735288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002696752,0.00040676558,0.0004910181,0.0021455502,0.006457365,0.0100056175,0.00084659917,0.002375807,0.00664375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00232606,0.00015887644,0.0002522098,0.0036903643,0.017578447,0.009646799,0.0051636687,0.0041043414,0.00042791016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017312703,0.000047339978,0.0023763268,0.00011569919,0.000006325839,0.00076411455,0.29088527,0.00023453379,0.0001468529,0.68671095,0.006941879,0.011753404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008542996,0.000027747732,0.0036210841,0.00041281868,0.000008540706,0.0002996381,0.69206434,0.000635142,0.0001446321,0.14620112,0.15656401,0.000012387797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011052619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018574668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011052619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006050151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002429855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043897152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911581129","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000818","title":"A Gender Gap in Party Congruence and Responsiveness?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Gender gap; Representation (politics); Democracy; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Political economy; Demographic economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.08400816165923213,"score_gpt":0.3670949356392507,"score_spread":0.2830867739800186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911581129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95777017,0.0005812058,0.0012710458,0.0020294988,0.00009699012,0.000019970426,0.00018042096,0.000008213452,0.038042482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994203,0.000036142817,0.000051099058,0.00005602289,0.000026417472,0.000006601578,0.000024259241,0.0000022660442,0.00037684946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966671,0.0018084401,0.00013316491,0.0004035306,0.00057909935,0.00040862308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98214877,0.01230466,0.0029102808,0.00083765417,0.0007847547,0.0010139106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004866018,0.000104969324,0.00033250026,0.000923244,0.0007003036,0.001831776,0.0004506243,0.00037966136,0.0143875275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028485114,0.00009495256,0.00017984596,0.0011871402,0.0016585332,0.0012223858,0.0015942977,0.0006429802,0.0006703834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010006151,0.00032015116,0.83988965,0.00019510517,0.00012688643,0.0005077541,0.03572219,0.00023971559,0.003153565,0.056515135,0.0023917637,0.059937548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031628068,0.00023960875,0.9443506,0.0001340591,0.000033299435,0.00022900636,0.031936713,0.00048503283,0.00078944414,0.015044809,0.006708599,0.00001720228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007259179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008298434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143875275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036376968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042781697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04813105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911708914","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000892","title":"The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ethnic group; Voting; Political science; Attendance; Poverty; Democracy; Gender studies; Gender gap; Face (sociological concept); Survey data collection; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Law; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.0653853477192291,"score_gpt":0.36326986618698376,"score_spread":0.29788451846775466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911708914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95215625,0.00063697534,0.0007260514,0.0022535578,0.0001272127,0.000078197656,0.0011533583,0.00002733439,0.04284102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970401,0.00010114341,0.00010807326,0.00014753306,0.000025039715,0.000046334262,0.00019027143,0.0000075020275,0.0023339505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913726,0.0038557558,0.00040058634,0.0007787254,0.0017733828,0.0018189414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622594,0.024670918,0.0054418123,0.0013902278,0.0030494812,0.0031881211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075581386,0.00014539849,0.00030105718,0.0014730422,0.0017936347,0.0021972132,0.00088084495,0.00063539983,0.01981762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04052227,0.000174716,0.00022790658,0.0013279744,0.0010062319,0.0014197892,0.0020621389,0.0008061489,0.0016290692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011685521,0.0005701605,0.7432096,0.00038773613,0.00011370839,0.00031715637,0.1223732,0.00015765722,0.0023829003,0.008775846,0.013279969,0.10726346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028280352,0.000121413184,0.8914035,0.0002895908,0.000027901018,0.00012225055,0.079426125,0.00032157966,0.0009627817,0.002523093,0.02474353,0.000029860035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02462893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033633873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02462893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017851816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016605732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06629652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009948428","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x19000886","title":"Implementing Inclusion: Gender Quotas, Inequality, and Backlash in Kenya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Inclusion (mineral); Backlash; Oppression; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Inequality; Gender equality; Political science; Power (physics); Affirmative action; Gender inequality; Gender studies; Redress; Gender mainstreaming; Politics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1272810967360012,"score_gpt":0.391375779632924,"score_spread":0.26409468289692284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009948428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8917481,0.0009357348,0.005076273,0.013788939,0.00013836604,0.0004387598,0.00004361698,0.000021588821,0.08780868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652964,0.00013534212,0.0007244594,0.00047618445,0.000009709539,0.00011482701,0.000006150507,0.000005586322,0.0019981195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730622,0.019472895,0.0006067936,0.0009359462,0.0022472434,0.0036749307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97839046,0.015653886,0.0028866876,0.00089914654,0.0011707002,0.0009992095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03785188,0.00033934045,0.00046910794,0.0012809742,0.021091437,0.0067155934,0.0012983611,0.0021834425,0.0050689895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03451862,0.0004747995,0.00021770048,0.0017339529,0.021292211,0.006879472,0.01086465,0.0026931302,0.00022845177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001499172,0.00019343052,0.014517533,0.0003766396,0.000014789779,0.0009854842,0.75834215,0.00028601752,0.0033370247,0.15082677,0.0025049595,0.068465345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047930997,0.00039208677,0.02615071,0.0012184911,0.000027677255,0.00026432058,0.80544615,0.000679986,0.0042236275,0.03481726,0.12663595,0.000095792944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016011063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032284055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03785188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011972453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014322725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20018232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047319872","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x2000032x","title":"Introduction: (Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation through Empirical Perspectives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Empowerment; Conversation; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Structuring; Feminism; Gender studies; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10190767586182954,"score_gpt":0.3887894582013223,"score_spread":0.2868817823394928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047319872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006666029,0.042854592,0.009977225,0.8039548,0.036937535,0.00008641525,0.00039911605,0.000114374016,0.09900999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36332825,0.06881529,0.019966898,0.35194707,0.09401417,0.00085509004,0.00062343944,0.0008029014,0.099646986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957153,0.0027398414,0.000111861395,0.00045637946,0.0007190615,0.00025750787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97867966,0.018203307,0.00056121673,0.00059080997,0.0014207297,0.00054424803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065342234,0.0008475807,0.00065125705,0.0025361327,0.006460829,0.01061994,0.0018532914,0.006447907,0.013235688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014318518,0.0002934408,0.0005620423,0.002678963,0.020492498,0.01391756,0.005364802,0.016173102,0.002061416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030010355,0.00003380906,0.0006886746,0.0006453656,0.0000086501395,0.00015598541,0.06425828,0.00012547248,0.00033781008,0.65682316,0.2527566,0.024136184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049040095,0.000014701978,0.0005087914,0.0013233228,0.000003487161,0.00011988454,0.023346119,0.00012760037,0.00014529222,0.062426787,0.9119641,0.000014920762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038799862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004175874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013235688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053905803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002727364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044277787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047526546","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000574","title":"Evidence of Exacerbated Gender Inequality in Child Care Obligations in Canada and Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Inequality; Psychological intervention; Child care; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Health care; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economic growth; Psychology; Medicine; Economics; Psychiatry; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.23989231088463273,"score_gpt":0.38142719382560786,"score_spread":0.14153488294097513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047526546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915005,0.00042401734,0.00006826189,0.0018946689,0.000014974184,0.000013265923,0.00039692552,0.0000017021887,0.0056855413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909294,0.0002241173,0.000037180725,0.00015709408,0.000004388954,0.000006368302,0.00008404383,0.0000015911281,0.0003922269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976305,0.0004039509,0.000050570656,0.00020027957,0.00045685016,0.0012579835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995061,0.00063799537,0.0015242036,0.00018221124,0.0013081175,0.0012865155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017695617,0.00014938075,0.00032544733,0.0010733467,0.00648054,0.001939029,0.00086990604,0.00053209916,0.0032087106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061178096,0.00021756787,0.00021132285,0.0023107424,0.002717799,0.0009202378,0.0029551885,0.0013073151,0.00010172184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010278516,0.00005733795,0.9117403,0.00005497057,0.000046839086,0.00027127872,0.06352997,0.0002181156,0.0003617869,0.0034129743,0.003478582,0.01672512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001962603,0.000010240674,0.9578302,0.00005687769,0.0000050175736,0.000028955104,0.038828835,0.000119757075,0.000057866793,0.00016729835,0.0028815072,0.000011495905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98885417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024095714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022042567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02544068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15993077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049345155","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000598","title":"News Coverage of Child Care during COVID-19: Where Are Women and Gender?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Newspaper; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Child care; Pandemic; Health care; Political science; Conversation; Psychology; Medicine; Geography; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.05534261393746137,"score_gpt":0.3311575366734799,"score_spread":0.27581492273601854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049345155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8521497,0.0037865115,0.00042537178,0.019683842,0.00030619933,0.000039624025,0.002385742,0.000015083952,0.12120788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992312,0.001211737,0.00009781561,0.0009839635,0.00009055218,0.000011671407,0.0003226535,0.000014626943,0.004955046],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974119,0.00076065905,0.00006440609,0.00021815267,0.000675358,0.00086953124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932549,0.0031373228,0.0013397691,0.0001814879,0.0013205378,0.0007659502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026278282,0.00019979084,0.00029968805,0.0021588246,0.004141869,0.0058563426,0.00052158686,0.0006152481,0.008691851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009747255,0.00015169663,0.0001487247,0.004092405,0.004024383,0.0020158994,0.0014118764,0.0011750605,0.0005220683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021751654,0.000033495813,0.20813668,0.00029897803,0.0000414358,0.0008083092,0.69492716,0.00007551365,0.0009829091,0.022666706,0.0231764,0.04863491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037351397,0.000018584482,0.24488656,0.00054614106,0.000023884304,0.00015712251,0.6479847,0.00014263269,0.00044087117,0.0012275157,0.10453657,0.00003179019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64451075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7193485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64451075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011988698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006520114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085774845","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000227","title":"Do Elites Discriminate against Female Political Aspirants? Evidence from a Field Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Audit; Identity (music); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Gender bias; Social psychology; Gender studies; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.19880936294169302,"score_gpt":0.40711831086701833,"score_spread":0.2083089479253253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085774845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902119,0.000037828002,0.00034937187,0.00024517116,0.000034917848,0.0003815828,0.00012260761,0.000008585547,0.008608005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913585,0.00006990552,0.0009501464,0.00065847806,0.00003542758,0.0004884064,0.00014641577,0.00000708359,0.006285645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99096584,0.0044507124,0.00025208318,0.00088418066,0.002262498,0.0011846599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96424663,0.018586187,0.005870453,0.0038216256,0.0053238817,0.0021512015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015753841,0.00046075106,0.00050137547,0.00070591,0.0038918972,0.0017831238,0.0010175655,0.00137664,0.00568291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022850402,0.0004552957,0.0002790084,0.0007072503,0.0038124705,0.0008094724,0.00081146526,0.0010765243,0.00092358264],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024499977,0.03767766,0.73052216,0.00048565224,0.00029717977,0.0006620109,0.057162322,0.00037743326,0.044729285,0.007669858,0.012765907,0.08315059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016204385,0.015186166,0.92957515,0.000118834585,0.00015926198,0.00018560629,0.022578562,0.0010130509,0.007536376,0.00248894,0.019424373,0.000113157475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19821836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29209933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19821836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025694035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035713164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39412916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100890669","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000276","title":"Who Controls the Purse Strings? A Longitudinal Study of Gender and Donations in Canadian Politics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Turnout; Voting; Political science; Inequality; Demographic economics; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Gender gap; Exploit; Gender inequality; Economics; Geography; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.12633067115890276,"score_gpt":0.3674263896089986,"score_spread":0.24109571845009584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100890669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906908,0.0004543581,0.0001499742,0.0017562606,0.00003354723,0.000023211971,0.0014143388,0.000005612521,0.0054718857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669814,0.00013531467,0.00009416283,0.00012675514,0.0000060613474,0.000011524354,0.00039468883,0.00000394839,0.0025294821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813783,0.00028466474,0.000032966924,0.00018808534,0.000414474,0.00094205147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494547,0.00050870434,0.0009896077,0.00028161696,0.0016503215,0.0016242408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033966445,0.00018761505,0.00035456172,0.0015757018,0.0065800208,0.0018436507,0.0011014884,0.0008066779,0.0045734737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006804167,0.00022034087,0.00038747408,0.0026748243,0.0015029237,0.0006834398,0.0010614637,0.0016010391,0.00043111955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001228857,0.0001107084,0.96712935,0.0000130915405,0.000029990108,0.00009091959,0.010584528,0.00015603725,0.00018798956,0.0021365026,0.00545829,0.013979674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004508189,0.00002032689,0.9806042,0.000046634617,0.000012173236,0.000032702654,0.01097859,0.00037863094,0.000077021934,0.00027710467,0.0075476477,0.00002029764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98245126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021329032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021329032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025829833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15475368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115730110","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000653","title":"The Politics of Part-Time Work: Gender, Employment Status, and Preferences for Redistribution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Argument (complex analysis); Welfare state; Demographic economics; Scholarship; Politics; Workforce; Redistribution of income and wealth; Welfare; Work (physics); Labour economics; Panel data; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.13341120918693056,"score_gpt":0.3606680565725164,"score_spread":0.22725684738558583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115730110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915944,0.00015094763,0.00022723981,0.0012371704,0.000008825357,0.0000033323179,0.000050504063,7.57618e-7,0.0067267222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952304,0.000035014113,0.000022394548,0.00006444358,0.0000064498636,0.0000016548719,0.000011670565,3.6146398e-7,0.0003348862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909735,0.00059192936,0.000020894217,0.00006192275,0.00010267167,0.00012536507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995227,0.0024022828,0.0013952798,0.00023592843,0.00020775468,0.0005317581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018458983,0.00008390062,0.00014504386,0.00044443947,0.00071709836,0.0011683005,0.00016428679,0.00043741305,0.0072317645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004909886,0.00006976896,0.00013767564,0.00039825976,0.0013758235,0.00049030676,0.0005309537,0.00039602228,0.00024642824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002898748,0.0002880708,0.9566262,0.00003102519,0.000063535575,0.00012966944,0.0048576775,0.00061867613,0.0010131373,0.02013435,0.0012408257,0.014706904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001670025,0.000117742726,0.9751559,0.000053505002,0.000021895863,0.00007078959,0.012608897,0.00069758995,0.00025480255,0.007887275,0.0031043405,0.000010423626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023397296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007525756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072317645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042785713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02419269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162325564","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x21000131","title":"Representations of Political Leadership Qualities in News Coverage of Australian and Canadian Government Leaders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Honesty; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Compassion; Ethical leadership; Law","score_opus":0.2227002407283119,"score_gpt":0.391350195886908,"score_spread":0.1686499551585961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162325564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870554,0.00019572007,0.00006644608,0.000330314,0.000026080608,0.000016824539,0.00041711825,0.0000084454,0.011883625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753124,0.00022872529,0.000085655745,0.00008092625,0.000029362032,0.000015635365,0.00025650216,0.000006686892,0.0017652455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810153,0.00050359254,0.00007504391,0.000103837105,0.0009164698,0.0002994217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821109,0.0056095077,0.004994126,0.00039728687,0.0055372906,0.0013508666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024664397,0.00027782322,0.00025976877,0.005154716,0.0025088692,0.0041895187,0.00043520864,0.00046120756,0.0033242695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015479795,0.00020877835,0.00015395385,0.0035836266,0.0012407068,0.0011172721,0.0013870622,0.00068855786,0.00025717285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004538682,0.00010055686,0.5166667,0.00023482504,0.00008115991,0.0007071137,0.4375821,0.00014851821,0.003717714,0.0011537409,0.0051300926,0.034023587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074479353,0.00006983971,0.7787218,0.00014226935,0.000031629028,0.00018064462,0.20504409,0.00036153375,0.000504698,0.0000928647,0.0147892255,0.000053869528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61897045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.717861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38102955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007105667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038757224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76654696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200163642","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x21000350","title":"Lobbying Beyond the Legislature: Challenges and Biases in Women's Organizations’ Participation in Rulemaking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Legislature; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public relations; Process (computing); Political process; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09522584680998458,"score_gpt":0.37046089075104494,"score_spread":0.27523504394106035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200163642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745243,0.0006900259,0.002076695,0.0071581746,0.0001041102,0.0000698663,0.000065142114,0.000010924123,0.015300656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977798,0.00016518077,0.00027967492,0.00078321394,0.00004733023,0.00006411741,0.000019516014,0.000007678649,0.0008534933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87800103,0.100577466,0.0034413466,0.0033312477,0.010152574,0.0044964016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85594696,0.10584129,0.02068716,0.0059391456,0.00857729,0.003008102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07468794,0.00027932276,0.00055248284,0.0030418814,0.0060683354,0.0070608393,0.0014517059,0.0012242275,0.002977179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1316901,0.0004229179,0.0002578869,0.002390449,0.008382082,0.0035082144,0.0051447167,0.0014076936,0.00044275587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020676413,0.00009064249,0.22114748,0.00022062888,0.000059976435,0.00030201202,0.7089174,0.000089887726,0.0008730187,0.013506672,0.0033026198,0.051282942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025221048,0.000103519465,0.09374326,0.0006582109,0.00003011037,0.00034857364,0.86631465,0.00056028285,0.0014400531,0.008028813,0.028696675,0.00005061043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077541578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103245415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07468794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022728269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003641574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3949923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280620206","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000149","title":"Gender Is Not a Proxy: Race and Intersectionality in Legislative Recruitment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"University of Toronto; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Intersectionality; Legislature; Proxy (statistics); Politics; Race (biology); Representation (politics); White (mutation); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20891976995841482,"score_gpt":0.4110593581514884,"score_spread":0.2021395881930736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280620206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767298,0.00038143696,0.0006538263,0.0011687159,0.00003180529,0.000013436303,0.000060888295,0.0000046049327,0.02095551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.000049744835,0.000105840125,0.000052953455,0.000006917457,0.0000058619075,0.000014943503,0.0000035972787,0.00058289146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962419,0.002044047,0.00008769461,0.00031882347,0.00062426715,0.0006833666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921789,0.0029843473,0.0022273336,0.0004607433,0.0009972135,0.0011514003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054440885,0.00011779074,0.0003780127,0.0012738081,0.0041294713,0.0034354515,0.00069542724,0.0004628144,0.0059764166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016571267,0.00016655175,0.00022128026,0.001775843,0.004715088,0.0017023926,0.0031764868,0.00076983235,0.00031043703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023481462,0.00009097448,0.8862561,0.000048981383,0.000048583664,0.00011733137,0.0595712,0.00011381792,0.0005660517,0.021433828,0.0014622408,0.030056162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066479724,0.000057344943,0.8976452,0.00018581748,0.000033689594,0.00011632741,0.088395044,0.00041178355,0.00034412777,0.0044594705,0.008323749,0.00002089157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10700576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23667985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10700576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002796941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037966445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21276587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321442586","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000721","title":"How Jacob Zuma Revitalized Feminism in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"South African History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Political science; Presidential system; Government (linguistics); Media studies; Front (military); Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0925593193810981,"score_gpt":0.3115952573758906,"score_spread":0.2190359379947925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321442586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23158452,0.026735162,0.0036004684,0.36491072,0.0067874747,0.00020824443,0.000072410985,0.00007873537,0.3660223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8402121,0.0058438433,0.0009508386,0.034034226,0.0005764925,0.00009634014,0.00001843282,0.0001919356,0.118075766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949705,0.0030852328,0.00008178254,0.00025677253,0.00040038343,0.0012052001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980572,0.0010397037,0.00012665133,0.00012764016,0.0001919905,0.00045676975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007874866,0.0006938715,0.00036788807,0.0011929901,0.030054558,0.008110166,0.0009284896,0.00454805,0.011107731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007003407,0.0005299298,0.00040645798,0.0008996933,0.0317457,0.009092161,0.011297759,0.010897263,0.0010698441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030826508,0.000029522103,0.0006276005,0.0001446986,0.000008228963,0.0014058851,0.78837866,0.00008553231,0.0012099543,0.17451158,0.019743787,0.013823735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010551926,0.00003108146,0.000664632,0.00038150867,0.0000063633065,0.00041082717,0.28533423,0.00007267253,0.00075560197,0.021148428,0.6911605,0.00002356134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029424958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058852907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030054558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011195686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105325645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08123082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321498640","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000733","title":"#JusticePourMirabelle: The Resurgence of a Transnational Cameroonian Feminist Movement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Transnationalism; Feminism; Politics; Political science; Social movement; Independence (probability theory); Political action; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08613980329431391,"score_gpt":0.2679322631442322,"score_spread":0.18179245984991826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321498640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6991075,0.0143427,0.0022265238,0.0922201,0.0038231974,0.00016563573,0.00018551454,0.000075411306,0.18785337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93849176,0.002840783,0.0010726249,0.007929428,0.00018160458,0.00007144285,0.000039959257,0.00004470302,0.04932762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910104,0.00038615963,0.000012556288,0.0000834133,0.000051373077,0.0003655155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00026698038,0.00008537666,0.0000362499,0.00006944093,0.00020441302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002426345,0.00050098036,0.00017451937,0.0005952459,0.009422767,0.0033463293,0.0003479256,0.0014137843,0.013270658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014935127,0.00023109448,0.00017067917,0.0007267303,0.004412836,0.003182541,0.004022111,0.0025521454,0.0005688502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004261802,0.00010426828,0.018650861,0.00071207597,0.000018981422,0.011327881,0.422071,0.00014804142,0.009401077,0.28954348,0.07819917,0.16939698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013593423,0.00011756775,0.016113952,0.00049888995,0.000013733802,0.0015053612,0.20765465,0.00028076666,0.0019286775,0.0043212622,0.7675113,0.00004021603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016612135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026637476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016612135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035368958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030996848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04439473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322770244","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000666","title":"High-Risk Feminism in Colombia: Women’s Mobilization in Violent Contexts. By Julia Margaret Zulver. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2022. 194 pp. $29.95 (paper). ISBN: 9781978827097.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"History and Politics in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Mobilization; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018021044329887288,"score_gpt":0.2701570030284356,"score_spread":0.2521359586985483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322770244","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021569418,0.67100865,0.00032073632,0.12668492,0.0034466295,0.00005161731,0.00037100867,0.00010163959,0.17644544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53193,0.3045975,0.00068282656,0.0067138984,0.002030448,0.00015827545,0.00037469674,0.00015018038,0.15336211],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994849,0.00024353569,0.000012169749,0.000040378825,0.00007321793,0.00014575767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933296,0.00027206834,0.00009531718,0.000022604689,0.00005339522,0.00022371924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083871477,0.0008498374,0.0003726988,0.0010112874,0.004391444,0.0050564804,0.0006769465,0.0016174752,0.019706301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014251927,0.00039525947,0.00020090184,0.0016617632,0.004096199,0.0028776997,0.0027153534,0.0019434218,0.0013338685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018935149,0.000094140276,0.0062077353,0.0022487214,0.000029845149,0.0008119242,0.07764358,0.00024199726,0.0007409615,0.0546271,0.5521538,0.3050108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001955394,0.00002165041,0.024188431,0.0017158863,0.00001671131,0.00032679253,0.0662543,0.000121051125,0.00027870302,0.005527293,0.9014961,0.000033490145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14504263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29977155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14504263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085633565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28839678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322774782","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000041","title":"“Don’t Put Color in Your Hair, Don’t Do This, Don’t Do That”: Canadian Mayors’ Mixed Gender Performance on Social Media","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Social media; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.13384462839543793,"score_gpt":0.34388042563871146,"score_spread":0.21003579724327354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322774782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792027,0.00020642717,0.0001506058,0.0010974866,0.000041484353,0.000028173316,0.000362784,0.000022223508,0.018888157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938412,0.00014736493,0.000115708775,0.00015629678,0.0000071786,0.00001047295,0.00011069327,0.000014886794,0.005596146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705255,0.00055251986,0.00006827324,0.00030478652,0.0010949795,0.00092684355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996219,0.00061069254,0.0005101318,0.00018189936,0.0013881322,0.001090047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002707246,0.00045653977,0.00039422617,0.0023934518,0.016063327,0.0043871286,0.00095567084,0.0006813818,0.0064078546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047609014,0.00031135883,0.00028511288,0.0028054148,0.0055587953,0.0008658403,0.0025674077,0.0011615289,0.0005219006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019902212,0.00004665816,0.12056714,0.0000923068,0.0000287613,0.0009814574,0.8408135,0.0000793592,0.002504945,0.0027188382,0.009744373,0.022223644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057253837,0.000045376448,0.17072497,0.000086654065,0.000015635536,0.00021229265,0.79161423,0.000204387,0.00043145812,0.00011950382,0.03646552,0.00007430663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97842705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99102587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023393769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023393769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017470293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16973442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362473398","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000089","title":"Making Women Visible: How Gender Quotas Shape Global Attitudes toward Women in Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Demographic economics; Gender equality; Economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.1532895255049057,"score_gpt":0.4061254290266456,"score_spread":0.2528359035217399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362473398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946567,0.000067071356,0.0006121207,0.00034939908,0.00001039696,0.0000056814706,0.00006829638,0.0000035587962,0.0042268643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999663,0.00001361013,0.00009555219,0.000021059948,0.0000021309345,0.0000037431034,0.000014862147,0.0000015680387,0.00018451184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757224,0.0018188694,0.000037391615,0.00019858075,0.00014286289,0.00023008697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923159,0.004981606,0.001580823,0.00048585975,0.0002666563,0.000369181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029993868,0.00013863678,0.00026362436,0.00034562926,0.0006235901,0.0019127332,0.00023744165,0.00042438894,0.006960014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009898979,0.00010758219,0.0004181614,0.00054826314,0.0016590838,0.00083215797,0.0013047825,0.0006740399,0.000292807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064912764,0.00030003797,0.919432,0.000119712655,0.00036097455,0.00014053313,0.01754879,0.0029322195,0.003102075,0.024662077,0.001324713,0.029427726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030051908,0.0004747838,0.9531634,0.00012734446,0.00019842791,0.0000404675,0.01780613,0.005519454,0.0014359589,0.015070672,0.006094122,0.00003933328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059533487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007845697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006960014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065781636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040836298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023283541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375862529","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000193","title":"Submitting to<i>Politics &amp; Gender</i>: Advice from the Editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Advice (programming); Gender diversity; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.09662746601316172,"score_gpt":0.3702450478609993,"score_spread":0.2736175818478376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375862529","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018683047,0.013414268,0.0015876266,0.32946217,0.646737,0.00029936197,0.000234803,0.00045176793,0.0076262057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027433063,0.03039157,0.006313378,0.24494046,0.64003426,0.00076752657,0.0004546794,0.0009921115,0.07336265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730281,0.0077036885,0.0049374183,0.00175132,0.011639812,0.0009396548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6785078,0.04231834,0.013663758,0.007534953,0.23705597,0.02091918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039894126,0.0019484292,0.002409659,0.0052325036,0.0050944164,0.015090278,0.0041951444,0.012021823,0.04166539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24310029,0.0014008011,0.002354645,0.0033081577,0.0031116134,0.010693591,0.0044814292,0.016469512,0.06153326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010452636,0.000004831072,0.00006447938,0.00017565298,0.000004738611,0.000053455184,0.00014036607,0.000008212376,0.0000721247,0.00017422621,0.99130356,0.007987829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011130123,0.000014657505,0.00017741445,0.00054844486,0.000013869416,0.00013536154,0.00030817295,0.000028330975,0.00010003431,0.00072081643,0.9979175,0.000024253344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025391271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059952866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003933589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012200561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2109828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381167617","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000302","title":"Gender and LGBT Affinity: The Case of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Transgender; Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10856351286548917,"score_gpt":0.3565512361569549,"score_spread":0.24798772329146573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381167617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650613,0.00017415987,0.00012760985,0.004948325,0.000028136727,0.00003606968,0.00011792239,0.0000043653367,0.029502096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863462,0.00019969213,0.0001106762,0.00086031243,0.000009445278,0.00001794826,0.000053714943,0.0000069291928,0.0123951165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809283,0.00035236814,0.00002718182,0.00012079594,0.00034811647,0.0010587525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975121,0.00032207477,0.00036312218,0.00008972938,0.00062294694,0.0010899318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013231037,0.00017986877,0.00031281347,0.0009959935,0.02424346,0.0023562317,0.0008286072,0.0009621493,0.0056025665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027470107,0.00021475888,0.00021996094,0.0017556956,0.0044554784,0.0009195681,0.0022700357,0.0016849331,0.00037868755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013167752,0.00014815974,0.33384985,0.00007958058,0.000027032325,0.005950022,0.6011735,0.0002290909,0.0016431797,0.0137499245,0.017897962,0.025120016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011862397,0.000050003462,0.23000973,0.00007728596,0.000014458326,0.00047106337,0.7004956,0.0002289844,0.00028889114,0.000697367,0.06761216,0.0000425567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035970736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035970736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026569547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26098716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383033633","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000363","title":"Antigone’s Example: Early Modern Women’s Political Writing in Times of Civil War from Christine de Pizan to Helen Maria Williams. By Mihoko Suzuki. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 452 pp. $119.99 (cloth), $89.00 (ebook). ISBN: 9783030844547.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Politics; Humanities; Art history; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03292317802618407,"score_gpt":0.24777439302891505,"score_spread":0.21485121500273097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383033633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036974046,0.21199976,0.0014682952,0.1500659,0.013706386,0.000046921028,0.0006330045,0.000109271874,0.58499634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2632168,0.05959445,0.0012975811,0.023243554,0.0041212123,0.0000945805,0.00038494525,0.00030217104,0.64774466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997632,0.00013935605,0.000006467004,0.000018784702,0.000040928033,0.000031414267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996656,0.00021739413,0.00002289998,0.000015923995,0.000037963684,0.000040140916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004566738,0.00047950103,0.00017794032,0.0009890641,0.0033567236,0.0019361224,0.00039221413,0.0010400148,0.018832782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011271826,0.00019024836,0.00013811086,0.0014833495,0.001773145,0.002597824,0.0014212372,0.0020391655,0.003096632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006540675,0.000029628603,0.0003918033,0.00031704665,0.0000079861575,0.00056146196,0.067800276,0.000026437405,0.0004514181,0.05158098,0.81880265,0.05996479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000229177,0.0000059314766,0.00091306405,0.00019482657,0.0000016242965,0.00019425846,0.013464312,0.000010549213,0.00012240339,0.0019690874,0.9831182,0.0000035039157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052039837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030138038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018832782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008817535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000564068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386778609","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000429","title":"Violence against Women in Politics: An Urgent Problem the Political Science Community Must Take Seriously","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Political science; Content analysis; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.08707627910245493,"score_gpt":0.37289068984305757,"score_spread":0.28581441074060265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386778609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005008129,0.03547732,0.00029427657,0.94075567,0.0028442526,0.000006731921,0.000029081995,0.000012029938,0.015572531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45056093,0.14998268,0.00181833,0.3478183,0.02288469,0.00013142459,0.00014437278,0.00011890378,0.026540415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98215795,0.01283973,0.0003190572,0.00052305695,0.0018070876,0.002353131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97404367,0.01713228,0.001607234,0.0008177201,0.0018497782,0.0045492086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016202986,0.00047636597,0.0015626885,0.0011831541,0.009900956,0.014271633,0.0015063579,0.015882203,0.011770802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023089096,0.00036539978,0.0005642263,0.0020815935,0.021499177,0.012478988,0.0057109063,0.012893596,0.0018794709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008288609,0.0001473638,0.0063752816,0.0012449508,0.00007833463,0.00064112537,0.029383222,0.00019988592,0.00034443382,0.40752164,0.42229083,0.13168998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004051494,0.00010875924,0.0076101623,0.005951178,0.00005158814,0.0008376669,0.10373892,0.00022009606,0.00037262848,0.25098953,0.62999505,0.000083894556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010694616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018772317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016202986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047163004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012284917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08569062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387876195","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000508","title":"Gender and LGBT Affinity: The Case of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne – CORRIGENDUM","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1164111786813375,"score_gpt":0.3450629871823485,"score_spread":0.22865180850101102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387876195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09055525,0.0105479425,0.00044389468,0.2913148,0.0037906994,0.00009766557,0.00035644593,0.000028792132,0.60286456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40865445,0.0096529545,0.00056263123,0.045666307,0.0005443056,0.00010930857,0.00013071686,0.000097295815,0.5345821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.00026685785,0.000028309067,0.00010899083,0.00033761418,0.0005448855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990157,0.00025259177,0.000059998438,0.00003229119,0.0003060514,0.00033332448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011781035,0.0002954716,0.00036733103,0.0004806366,0.02809881,0.003679007,0.0011318792,0.0034234182,0.017189134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026805752,0.00029122035,0.0002639853,0.0011606102,0.0065314784,0.0018089243,0.0022607248,0.0041626887,0.0015132783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039295264,0.000036325306,0.005058887,0.00016882247,0.00001184147,0.005604071,0.28385767,0.00013336094,0.000336212,0.12550384,0.555751,0.023498612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007389619,0.000008567703,0.009384263,0.00026720966,0.000015298263,0.000791101,0.18668729,0.000084457046,0.00014126247,0.004215927,0.79835695,0.000040210263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9676628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050779738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050779738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034681026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393150591","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000060","title":"Do Women Politicians Know More about Women’s Policy Preferences? Evidence from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.061439899591045746,"score_gpt":0.36304991362573413,"score_spread":0.3016100140346884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393150591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549983,0.0018972972,0.00025074687,0.008377301,0.00006487107,0.00004188982,0.0036720973,0.0000113663,0.030686017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379987,0.00080871425,0.000087050554,0.00079729554,0.000017143544,0.000013266074,0.0010308452,0.0000089208725,0.0034367684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956073,0.0008413388,0.00016900882,0.00064712623,0.0016269807,0.0011082976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767279,0.0068587093,0.0045549483,0.0011098856,0.007978368,0.0027702495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004605767,0.00029724996,0.0007253015,0.0014763366,0.004765723,0.0023069123,0.0012381161,0.0008097933,0.01053092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021218076,0.0003840101,0.0005286013,0.0046742735,0.0018038746,0.00094509975,0.0012020499,0.0015576925,0.00066466426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003356722,0.00012274936,0.94551903,0.00015725478,0.00017665478,0.00017305251,0.01658114,0.00027597518,0.00015782808,0.0030749668,0.013034989,0.020390691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039302133,0.000032989774,0.96766883,0.00023810062,0.000080998536,0.000035066692,0.015251087,0.0005058962,0.00013605032,0.00052999624,0.015443009,0.000038650178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01805701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01805701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030516032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396930269","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000084","title":"Partisanship, Independence, and the Constitutive Representation of Women in the Canadian Senate","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06138904163061099,"score_gpt":0.3567185416860566,"score_spread":0.2953295000554456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396930269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555093,0.00018652112,0.00016797926,0.0006504092,0.0000151340155,0.000024787081,0.00014590853,0.000008681439,0.043291334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699366,0.00007182622,0.000057839512,0.00005903865,0.0000044529515,0.000006489599,0.00004172497,0.0000042040488,0.0027608387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626726,0.0008081597,0.00008919942,0.00033865438,0.001413723,0.0010830018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212986,0.0019640226,0.0014314612,0.0003538595,0.0023858186,0.0017349769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034676394,0.00016880865,0.00028826657,0.0023878203,0.011423486,0.002670677,0.00072876364,0.0004103657,0.0063128034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010855557,0.00023077764,0.00020179071,0.0022586207,0.0049192132,0.0005764631,0.0022485103,0.0008228923,0.00026957988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055873283,0.00014087929,0.60599995,0.0001357851,0.000090587746,0.00062751555,0.31721655,0.00030969764,0.0077331658,0.015385734,0.006319212,0.045482185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009237498,0.000040002753,0.85379356,0.0000723307,0.000023957824,0.00009329213,0.11449162,0.00024621293,0.000722393,0.0006162853,0.02983843,0.000052588846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92729086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97312546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020379717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018400472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14786589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401135095","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000138","title":"All the President’s Women? Female Leaders, Family Ties, and Gendered Cabinet Appointments Worldwide","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Nexus (standard); Politics; Family ties; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.10505571011532537,"score_gpt":0.3564953706520467,"score_spread":0.2514396605367213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401135095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916141,0.0006349035,0.00006288665,0.001093632,0.000039376737,0.0000027605392,0.00074862293,0.000003357342,0.0058004223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983454,0.00017286137,0.000017795059,0.00005978089,0.000027972525,0.0000025576726,0.00025928588,0.0000016402215,0.0011127975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995889,0.00012379547,0.000014422761,0.00006895179,0.00004569717,0.0001583101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971818,0.0005628263,0.0015011521,0.00007393962,0.00014066458,0.0005397156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069879286,0.00006744004,0.00016461215,0.0007409137,0.00064731314,0.0010808875,0.00016009639,0.00022245706,0.008577598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003452654,0.000070663526,0.000080515914,0.0012304004,0.00038482458,0.0006392435,0.00056470674,0.00051572436,0.00075519434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000861505,0.000035408266,0.97394717,0.000030402194,0.000028223818,0.00016207522,0.0035844822,0.000090899746,0.0001143442,0.001159414,0.0055785216,0.0151829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007910571,0.00004350391,0.96774083,0.000065256376,0.000010389853,0.00013218971,0.017725533,0.000115039154,0.00011294349,0.00029231014,0.0137467235,0.0000073408237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011389251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025346309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011389251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003116784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026051782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028694868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402991834","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x2400028x","title":"A Comparative Approach to Explaining Gender Disparities in Asian American and Asian Canadian Politics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Asian americans; Political science; Politics; Gender studies; Asian studies; Sociology; Ethnic group; China; Law","score_opus":0.10154057017396607,"score_gpt":0.37158609660993736,"score_spread":0.2700455264359713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402991834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7098179,0.009015839,0.0061372453,0.01511538,0.0003647183,0.00031385003,0.0027297754,0.000046080175,0.25645927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858613,0.0018012226,0.002368995,0.0010032138,0.000038390954,0.0001465495,0.00036836936,0.000010669336,0.008401272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.00041101396,0.000022811679,0.00013849534,0.00029665526,0.0004667981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850345,0.0005701442,0.00016635032,0.00009146254,0.000454239,0.00021431036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235442,0.00038887528,0.00035244398,0.004096796,0.0073177093,0.002205089,0.0010619664,0.0004899255,0.012063902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056595565,0.0001289979,0.00049716845,0.0073832115,0.0036888234,0.001633932,0.0021976545,0.00093139097,0.00019634227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019735936,0.00027173714,0.30999646,0.0003258082,0.00022203162,0.00046975302,0.098425984,0.000725314,0.00084451586,0.46743333,0.014487811,0.10659991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044302702,0.00013488714,0.59476626,0.0009184098,0.00033390478,0.00019688503,0.24309686,0.0023637551,0.0004761284,0.052595653,0.10501827,0.000054614786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9217888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9400097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07821119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022985293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023911228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16677076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403614922","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000394","title":"When Councillors Sexually Harass: Legislative Sanctions and Gender-Based Violence in Canada’s Municipalities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Legislature; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1057683313545247,"score_gpt":0.34350092487692613,"score_spread":0.23773259352240145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403614922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99221987,0.0001230706,0.00005688391,0.001130016,0.000015434354,0.000018729239,0.00016504955,0.0000030428967,0.0062679485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904805,0.00006947757,0.000029841322,0.00008205484,0.000003962677,0.0000045999122,0.00005368611,0.0000015840513,0.0007068003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961994,0.0007324447,0.000109231754,0.0002348451,0.0008555346,0.0018684696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870978,0.0013726815,0.004619014,0.00038396072,0.002221405,0.004305023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017738745,0.00013723799,0.00030815703,0.0015154963,0.007819743,0.0030381037,0.0010692327,0.00079086993,0.004259656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010917841,0.00026449142,0.00030737245,0.002440094,0.0031131713,0.00058912626,0.0019588368,0.0013495043,0.00024902064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007355853,0.000095588526,0.9695034,0.000028843126,0.000024987441,0.00023134136,0.017717524,0.00012545225,0.0001671006,0.0012580822,0.0027839306,0.007990213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049515825,0.00002960818,0.9290141,0.00008195689,0.000011885787,0.00006551569,0.0654795,0.00023373056,0.00009600647,0.00020525177,0.0047586495,0.000018709527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97350603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030950107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030950107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04320872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22455978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406187568","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000461","title":"A Look Back At 20 Years of Research on Gender and Voting in <i>Politics &amp; Gender</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.18917164918307217,"score_gpt":0.44586320192584816,"score_spread":0.256691552742776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406187568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062289998,0.73501664,0.0010042791,0.12577264,0.0095755225,0.000013705115,0.000496267,0.000022954091,0.06580806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43192822,0.49889085,0.000941147,0.034176756,0.014875357,0.000031909036,0.00053351047,0.00014128775,0.018481001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970675,0.001660271,0.00015596734,0.00024676597,0.0005413906,0.0003281227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804689,0.01547942,0.0013485561,0.00033378482,0.0016398252,0.0007294092],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053328327,0.00031549076,0.0006358272,0.0074624442,0.0036975718,0.0060227513,0.0004358983,0.0015209805,0.0053437958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012185376,0.00025423127,0.0003641569,0.011757885,0.0058634845,0.006657131,0.002375513,0.0030119596,0.00094027485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037067727,0.00019274035,0.018764373,0.004752529,0.00017007386,0.0010017722,0.1642402,0.00031302279,0.0017076159,0.26567444,0.16438988,0.3784226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000619842,0.00008303968,0.025597034,0.0072482293,0.000029389952,0.0003578896,0.060078133,0.00008958733,0.00032055695,0.01586593,0.89027613,0.000047832476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007091102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017972115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99253756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033536702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019631614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02820301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407879379","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25000054","title":"The Effects of Parental Leave on Attitudes Toward the State","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04359965363085923,"score_gpt":0.3811548104762186,"score_spread":0.33755515684535936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407879379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780124,0.00003912591,0.000035596222,0.00012224358,0.000004191139,0.0000012649609,0.000033105684,0.0000011046271,0.001961983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995946,0.000022096168,0.000009135999,0.000011232563,0.0000021741246,9.381915e-7,0.000023649907,6.253035e-7,0.00033561426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987035,0.000730367,0.000038038863,0.00009928335,0.00018606844,0.00024270029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135935,0.004610528,0.0026176674,0.00034788565,0.00034560642,0.00071897905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016892465,0.00012283014,0.00017070847,0.00043734818,0.0007461097,0.0014674914,0.00015824779,0.00036130476,0.0077525945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005753418,0.000090329304,0.00029362945,0.0004581744,0.0009340855,0.00044547737,0.0006905309,0.00074003614,0.00034447253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032568406,0.00028211746,0.9838209,0.000015225895,0.00007525166,0.00010605164,0.0063065547,0.00033174895,0.0005134349,0.0011994577,0.0002782147,0.0067454833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006134354,0.00016132634,0.9887251,0.000015806538,0.000022474685,0.00002786054,0.009486732,0.00023870087,0.00024441883,0.00025459033,0.0008104166,0.000006386047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011619208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015851319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011619208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006717876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002641857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025934994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409821732","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25000194","title":"Is Scholar-Activism an Oxymoron? Reflecting on the Challenges and Opportunities for Scholarly Activism or Activist Scholarship in the Politics and Gender Field","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Oxymoron; Politics; Field (mathematics); Political science; Political activism; Gender studies; Social activism; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6736886224126424,"score_gpt":0.5373872769503126,"score_spread":0.13630134546232975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409821732","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06638922,0.017761888,0.014551407,0.7836694,0.0067181084,0.00009401726,0.00006258864,0.00007895581,0.11067447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226584,0.008109031,0.004094726,0.047648024,0.004889238,0.00023698162,0.000045611865,0.00019927099,0.012118795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528517,0.036192995,0.0009346851,0.0027720835,0.0041996757,0.0030488428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91997623,0.062507875,0.0043435753,0.0038370027,0.0038084248,0.0055269385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05861173,0.0006524928,0.0011399742,0.0027347056,0.017754301,0.034886833,0.0026427964,0.010542254,0.004906898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051883068,0.00046584898,0.0006470485,0.0029073432,0.087578245,0.034252487,0.016356682,0.014533065,0.0008317806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033297372,0.00005787951,0.0016318873,0.00028586184,0.0000128387,0.00032101313,0.36723632,0.000041812564,0.0003579026,0.60616165,0.009302626,0.014556991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020901509,0.00007237955,0.001006691,0.0013298591,0.000022108945,0.0005405143,0.43063352,0.00021352153,0.00057439145,0.30115458,0.2643938,0.000037764526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018597515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003392386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064380593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010991628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30997217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412016112","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100093","title":"Are LGBTQ+ Candidates Disadvantaged in Financing Their Campaigns? Evidence from Canadian Federal Elections, 2015–21","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04826293965367555,"score_gpt":0.3581556625081397,"score_spread":0.3098927228544641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412016112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443622,0.0027104232,0.00015378966,0.009105591,0.00008476904,0.00006366254,0.0071204454,0.000012266765,0.03638688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940777,0.00083289307,0.00005381027,0.0005745318,0.000022469483,0.000019846975,0.00120457,0.0000070632464,0.003207046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961643,0.00049779285,0.000111442794,0.00026604207,0.0010692893,0.0018912124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871733,0.0015472795,0.003204167,0.00047002785,0.0045272526,0.0030778956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032010784,0.00020617679,0.00041703816,0.002515222,0.0058511114,0.0031582427,0.00129956,0.0006162179,0.011111728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013659663,0.00026720727,0.0003420382,0.005361114,0.0015357842,0.0009622057,0.0018790684,0.0012256299,0.0007275656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026014622,0.00009676058,0.93273747,0.0001649841,0.00007049297,0.00011842065,0.010818678,0.00010431906,0.0000989704,0.0047124433,0.023067093,0.027750127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015333233,0.000017946071,0.9704999,0.00015875058,0.000036039306,0.000019819981,0.014339576,0.000111380024,0.00006222842,0.00017887849,0.014542947,0.00001728822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020065427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020065427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03268032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14558554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412549329","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100196","title":"Feminist Government but No Feminist Foreign Policy: The Curious Case of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Foreign policy; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027637399971091055,"score_gpt":0.3268419158759638,"score_spread":0.29920451590487274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412549329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115972765,0.005595835,0.000908908,0.21401547,0.00050237647,0.000054489952,0.00027458556,0.00004199032,0.66263354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89393604,0.0024990127,0.00037120766,0.019917456,0.000080796424,0.000029227274,0.00005419276,0.00005549039,0.08305665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386543,0.00066042336,0.00004781231,0.00033645364,0.0011402565,0.003949572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964371,0.0008338971,0.00012079998,0.00013517786,0.0010557066,0.0014173364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023916378,0.00029614338,0.00051485206,0.0009281633,0.03824528,0.011277377,0.0015487418,0.005222734,0.010395248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068625207,0.00027870294,0.00038125503,0.002556131,0.01506715,0.002951166,0.003370442,0.0064267167,0.0005109339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003848401,0.000021116133,0.0026801145,0.00005437798,0.000013849619,0.0005793548,0.01966367,0.0003973695,0.00012493125,0.90901136,0.056168742,0.01124665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067748726,0.000024120456,0.012137994,0.00057203264,0.000078919154,0.0004130973,0.11622813,0.0014764563,0.0004836838,0.10662786,0.7617573,0.00013256083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99415475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99723583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12269158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12269158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19426289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8901939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414705229","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100421","title":"The WPS Agenda Beyond 2025: Time for a WPS Treaty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security council; Quarter (Canadian coin); Treaty; Work (physics); Track (disk drive); National security","score_opus":0.08691660210267951,"score_gpt":0.26247605848332867,"score_spread":0.17555945638064915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414705229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049201814,0.018324625,0.0038763091,0.7573272,0.03140834,0.00010759785,0.0010101508,0.00015175379,0.18287387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13726714,0.020730859,0.020117525,0.6154061,0.020719904,0.00079743913,0.0036226083,0.0005224554,0.18081594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910432,0.0020642043,0.000552809,0.0005406958,0.0034100001,0.0023890743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927146,0.0018938988,0.0004527049,0.00037230394,0.001408417,0.0031581873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01928379,0.0008480302,0.0008409334,0.001363219,0.005704633,0.018764006,0.0023717156,0.019330347,0.03558108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020923289,0.0005655193,0.0017920382,0.0018548243,0.00517649,0.02199668,0.010610306,0.018532496,0.007493798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957448,0.00008060784,0.0002191983,0.00014764418,0.00000707349,0.00019881608,0.0011006548,0.00018993828,0.00022908766,0.5416335,0.42815077,0.028003186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006546621,0.000017062603,0.00037285255,0.00039415003,0.000002916026,0.000038285343,0.0011962613,0.000079202226,0.000059310452,0.05645313,0.9413665,0.000013781302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014002376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010836737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03558108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007352658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03762346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119030595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}