{"meta":{"query_hash":"3c90707e58d8","filters":{"venue":"Politics & Gender"},"cohort_total":76,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":76,"exported":76,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3c90707e58d8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Politics+%26+Gender"},"results":[{"id":"W1964055302","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x13000330","title":"Crossings and Correspondences: Rethinking Intersectionality and the Category “Latino”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Lesbian; Human sexuality; Reading (process); Poetry; Intersectionality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Race (biology); Art; History; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.04887972984493162,"score_gpt":0.32316516542770707,"score_spread":0.27428543558277546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964055302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6496415,0.0009677693,0.00079751265,0.01014446,0.000371957,0.00032846403,0.0000030213293,0.000087086584,0.33765823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936644,0.00010048344,0.00047892937,0.0022995085,0.00015901883,0.000014331851,4.0751127e-7,0.0000047127214,0.0032781996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989989,0.00022952525,0.00014182944,0.00015736838,0.00021249519,0.0002598767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906874,0.00057198835,0.00007132399,0.00009936458,0.00010216317,0.00008639652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057041046,0.00008077674,0.0001204285,0.000023156614,0.0011803609,0.0003148642,0.00010248182,0.000044265755,0.00014684953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036009774,0.000053725875,0.000027127786,0.0000875797,0.0026115547,0.00018083396,0.00010679871,0.00013090334,0.000008993253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036579895,0.0000059910476,0.01832493,0.00000926729,0.000026560196,4.6822205e-7,0.25913683,3.664774e-7,0.000007529958,0.7194171,0.0012234867,0.0018438454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048076911,0.000014726022,0.1539685,0.000011645521,0.000026400146,0.000007442635,0.096228756,0.00038855587,0.000008797439,0.73401,0.014657105,0.00019735604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021002255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022689879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3440229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004083127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009967746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98551697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967831320","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x09000026","title":"Tracing Gender Equality Cultures: Elite Perceptions of Gender Equality in Norway and Sweden","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Gender equality; Gender studies; Perception; Tracing; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11580831612467504,"score_gpt":0.41816275416583865,"score_spread":0.3023544380411636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967831320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8156509,0.0005205209,0.0026338396,0.0008321176,0.00021417647,0.00039070795,0.00007393681,0.000051827054,0.17963202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966272,0.00025070607,0.00073798076,0.0008578776,0.0003625242,0.0000091797,0.000024705598,0.000015865628,0.0011139207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967592,0.00057754095,0.00065532856,0.00046171693,0.0006814292,0.0008647975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878097,0.00014571231,0.00012701137,0.0003519399,0.00023699045,0.00035740892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178161,0.00022953609,0.0003393051,0.000188581,0.00045180603,0.00010731622,0.00023008736,0.00026040297,0.00022411285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017845591,0.00022377181,0.00014415878,0.00029471188,0.00035875713,0.00025834772,0.000059675276,0.0002826054,0.000020055957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007762228,0.0002997668,0.03926718,0.0001162922,0.0000527214,0.0000038101957,0.25681674,0.00011732452,0.0025137754,0.69971883,0.00030482485,0.0007809556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057264324,0.00002495568,0.70433795,0.000017736578,0.00006720602,0.0000049777746,0.09672047,0.00015426094,0.00034947653,0.19593139,0.0014222937,0.0003966471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039789192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048751337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6650708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023454009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002877722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987429795","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x09990201","title":"The Numbers Do(n't) Always Add Up: Dilemmas in Using Quantitative Research Methods in Feminist IR Scholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Face (sociological concept); Field (mathematics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Epistemology; Feminist theory; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Political science; Social science; Feminism; Gender studies; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4672278900414181,"score_gpt":0.5796758687715056,"score_spread":0.11244797873008744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987429795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6965787,0.0025803105,0.00042178377,0.0024374414,0.0007271445,0.0006613529,0.000015775948,0.00005959028,0.29651794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935588,0.00015556786,0.00454224,0.00055311335,0.00022345147,0.0000134782085,0.000002206951,0.00001822144,0.00093290413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938842,0.003041994,0.00042449665,0.00040357455,0.00084289676,0.0014028521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974991,0.0015639489,0.00007897096,0.00036236158,0.00024123128,0.00025436218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008939202,0.00017154873,0.00023469569,0.00026982356,0.0012155266,0.00039542394,0.0006564862,0.00020877206,0.000070590366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002073593,0.00015473146,0.00009114713,0.0010153954,0.000686191,0.00020623213,0.00009935965,0.0009077039,0.00003565363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012457902,0.00008069862,0.012614595,0.0000071748755,0.00001162368,0.000012563631,0.16236158,0.000009879785,0.00012976138,0.8233061,0.00021429134,0.0012393106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053609355,0.00006862355,0.0569585,0.000041964526,0.0000139295935,0.0000036960614,0.3055815,0.00025062848,0.00030376157,0.5553895,0.08047587,0.00037588956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00942144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005796785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29698014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005898314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000856318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999808881","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x06231143","title":"The Substantive Representation of Women and PR: Some Reflections on the Role of Surrogate Representation and Critical Mass","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Prudence; Representation (politics); Voting; Citizenship; Ideology; Object (grammar); Political science; Yesterday; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0681192732031546,"score_gpt":0.38796716255364594,"score_spread":0.31984788935049135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999808881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96715546,0.00036411497,0.000105490064,0.0023810898,0.00014825315,0.00026683538,0.00002231828,0.000015128598,0.029541332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990359,0.00023090692,0.000083950974,0.000057305817,0.00016394554,0.00002517931,0.0000044061317,0.000008876841,0.000389517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984203,0.00037151895,0.00027569034,0.00018913018,0.00037509127,0.00036826506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981992,0.0011735426,0.00011788358,0.00020030566,0.00022666964,0.00008236772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000547145,0.00008111574,0.00012159483,0.00006409797,0.0006453764,0.00007318309,0.00009165212,0.00006149866,0.000010937293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004869531,0.000056868117,0.00004113664,0.00018938145,0.00088576286,0.00012104009,0.000030495163,0.0000927663,0.000001342844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009205183,0.000031575026,0.010577444,0.000008246107,0.0000230073,4.1538038e-7,0.022837974,0.000017081025,0.0022237299,0.9641116,0.00005147576,0.000108209635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015400404,0.00003543998,0.04303021,0.000005160274,0.000026458047,0.0000015331193,0.11904069,0.00018343046,0.01017578,0.8263474,0.0009264468,0.00007341233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038215262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001401526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1377642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008981548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093958035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.577703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003846455","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000219","title":"Relations of Freedom and Law's Relations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Centrality; Human sexuality; Constructive; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Focus (optics); Independence (probability theory); Element (criminal law); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07818005685223442,"score_gpt":0.3462182411075495,"score_spread":0.2680381842553151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003846455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.369334,0.0019934757,0.000190786,0.003431393,0.00044882146,0.00022563974,0.000036157835,0.000068008856,0.6242717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263376,0.000037437043,0.002055328,0.00009417823,0.0003495988,0.0000060945154,0.0000030708384,0.000005470014,0.004815073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992124,0.00007701193,0.0001394716,0.00007306659,0.0001935352,0.00030455034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943936,0.00019349981,0.00005222877,0.00007487734,0.00010030358,0.00013971033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020490661,0.000060762057,0.00009293368,0.000018434494,0.0007107745,0.000016105314,0.000057023102,0.00007434695,0.00019439764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002442343,0.00005394136,0.000037303624,0.00008508658,0.00053018134,0.00021554188,0.00004264387,0.000083679566,0.000057406432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2302696e-7,0.000020733545,0.06894867,0.0000030955782,0.00002166314,4.996745e-8,0.052438457,0.0000057045404,0.000018859542,0.8769978,0.0015264859,0.00001820071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026825402,0.000011515973,0.5979771,0.000009956923,0.0001224015,9.388797e-7,0.04126764,0.000035283487,0.00005006273,0.030708529,0.32930177,0.000246547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075665275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005529164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84628934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000991705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003202284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022622662","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000554","title":"Toward an Integrated Perspective of Minority Representation: Views from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Representation (politics); Dimension (graph theory); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Politics; Focus (optics); Isolation (microbiology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Geography; Pure mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22307543592744603,"score_gpt":0.42227172698925197,"score_spread":0.19919629106180595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022622662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92239994,0.00032352572,0.00020178231,0.0011511198,0.0006018266,0.00017966398,0.00014536383,0.000024445751,0.074972324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809813,0.0000021079309,0.00015326962,0.00023685777,0.00093968655,0.0000074935024,0.00002618264,0.0000045006127,0.0005317946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857354,0.00034535135,0.00021558107,0.00012249526,0.000319932,0.00042308887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990384,0.000116654715,0.00007220023,0.00014841571,0.00028356144,0.000340794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002157881,0.000074596064,0.00014842367,0.000020755337,0.00012634041,0.000018179899,0.000099369994,0.0000640603,0.00040783916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025617707,0.000069635826,0.000035341327,0.00013772497,0.000109885914,0.00018233752,0.000011943885,0.000079370024,0.000008299227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030469225,0.00006725833,0.17105341,0.0000072834355,0.00002603333,6.271763e-7,0.03317191,0.000001827381,0.00010682002,0.79343677,0.0020374884,0.0000875522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036552874,0.00005995633,0.69541943,0.00001641144,0.0001369045,0.0000010347126,0.1232354,0.000083617706,0.0046578,0.084347956,0.091196455,0.00047951718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99480027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8383228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7090888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005432224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066583673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4465553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059108472","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000263","title":"Tales of Two Cities: Women and Municipal Restructuring in London and Toronto. By Sylvia Bashevkin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. 2007. 184 pp. $85.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Library science; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014703543218265494,"score_gpt":0.2386375395465414,"score_spread":0.2239339963282759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059108472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798898,0.0046936045,0.000002678821,0.000009152323,0.00012253154,0.00014003136,0.00035062362,0.000014396981,0.014777144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834293,0.010872447,0.0001427898,0.000090369,0.000051515206,0.0000012646194,0.0000046345062,0.000010251774,0.0053973948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887705,0.000102599624,0.0001881927,0.0001956787,0.00024084993,0.0003956486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994759,0.000063973384,0.00009051831,0.00014181345,0.0000713135,0.00015648335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015481938,0.00007897083,0.00021656543,0.000011665573,0.0002695772,0.000031715244,0.00015147477,0.00007785088,0.0003974415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025019925,0.00012240157,0.000025118557,0.00005997829,0.0007875146,0.0002611251,0.00011042645,0.00008102662,8.854394e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049900696,0.00045789016,0.49121195,0.0002760154,0.00028876276,0.00011236016,0.24079056,0.000038317667,0.000736128,0.048385706,0.215235,0.00241742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002728356,0.000097115546,0.44998989,0.000077105506,0.000040391908,0.0000071208783,0.10226532,0.00006111867,0.000053637803,0.0066269934,0.43758357,0.00046940608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81892425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6787638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22234857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021321773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001282604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49913913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099145840","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000280","title":"Should International Relations Consider Rape a Weapon of War?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Power (physics); Political science; Software deployment; Criminology; Computer security; International relations; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.1011419913888959,"score_gpt":0.3766535844026077,"score_spread":0.2755115930137118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099145840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2825209,0.00012501652,0.0003742691,0.0061140805,0.0022349553,0.00015903675,0.0000430922,0.00006995015,0.7083587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890407,0.000023162283,0.0005876293,0.00074331346,0.0005508077,0.0000063934945,0.000009823588,0.000010486276,0.009027721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988452,0.00006341197,0.00021443598,0.00015949507,0.00041351118,0.00030392315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918514,0.00014535068,0.00007578435,0.00019232777,0.00025221804,0.00014918552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030135858,0.000085610016,0.000106849504,0.000091323476,0.00023095602,0.000030642288,0.00024167993,0.0001527094,0.0032512029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031421386,0.000089939545,0.00008635274,0.00009803655,0.00032113204,0.00010466784,0.000049179354,0.00025103535,0.00013190001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016961624,0.00006422137,0.012779218,0.0000042714933,0.000041577252,0.0000015712982,0.037490565,0.0000022273866,0.0007404184,0.9441829,0.00447226,0.00021909356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004589744,0.000016182408,0.028118426,0.000004965728,0.000056525016,0.0000062312834,0.023307746,0.00018397205,0.0009309048,0.17763893,0.7690075,0.0002696303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014977449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009950595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038357277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036205366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105148358","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000264","title":"Risk Aversion, Gender, and Constitutional Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Referendum; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Principle of legality; Government (linguistics); Politics; Stateless protocol; Political economy; Law; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.25636984191858847,"score_gpt":0.3887635585048551,"score_spread":0.13239371658626664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105148358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09922202,0.0032714373,0.000611818,0.004245223,0.0021429749,0.00045416987,0.00017976359,0.00019561443,0.889677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994465,0.00080789207,0.00013836173,0.0013445514,0.0021433963,0.000009916858,0.0000036631827,0.0000046078912,0.0010826027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899614,0.00010069245,0.00009746454,0.00012975719,0.0003011487,0.0003747758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994045,0.000064389584,0.000044560908,0.000067917856,0.00013288778,0.00028574656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035679713,0.00008221437,0.000103296894,0.00004328771,0.00090054225,0.000029983152,0.00007612117,0.00009541682,0.000022605476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030388858,0.00007033194,0.000036564426,0.000090000205,0.0026066843,0.000120402576,0.00006791195,0.00009696396,0.00006231033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015322869,0.000014544794,0.01749733,0.000003998932,0.00002944427,0.0000017827865,0.059467237,3.0980507e-7,3.4633223e-7,0.9181779,0.004633127,0.00017242694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061292376,0.00002166804,0.030660287,0.000004475539,0.000071216855,0.000004732823,0.094940215,0.000016034697,0.000011280673,0.667948,0.20543101,0.0002781164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026190677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062596526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106510626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002726716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96044374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105488691","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x06060107","title":"Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":350,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Work (physics); International relations; Emulation; Sociology; Political economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04998125576071779,"score_gpt":0.34478460431928276,"score_spread":0.294803348558565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105488691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64942193,0.0003651925,0.0011212921,0.002430104,0.0007022454,0.00038658225,0.00003028159,0.0000648768,0.3454775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906203,0.00006241625,0.00022690077,0.0003187069,0.00083347224,0.000013790513,0.00003219776,0.000018086677,0.007874129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979334,0.00022074848,0.00039651574,0.00023940881,0.00065131264,0.0005586393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895775,0.00015919996,0.00017977491,0.00038447347,0.0002028307,0.00011597278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043629282,0.00012824374,0.00015445036,0.000102306374,0.0007174132,0.0000678032,0.00026897996,0.00008713661,0.00015877845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087457316,0.00009561827,0.00011597335,0.0002897788,0.00036665954,0.00012891913,0.00008433234,0.00012965975,0.000022366365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051567067,0.000087241315,0.05190259,0.000028646054,0.000042734082,0.000005696124,0.03163957,0.00016072276,0.0007272351,0.91120386,0.0037076944,0.0004888625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010338523,0.000027137812,0.28817555,0.000023468281,0.00019953978,0.000015991358,0.10453545,0.0005517207,0.0090222275,0.5028074,0.09300902,0.00059868913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046309702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001362989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40839648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014643988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028301807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.960041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106885901","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000330","title":"Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Politics; Gender studies; Perception; Media coverage; Gender equality; Psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.12220079197973037,"score_gpt":0.38992136366105196,"score_spread":0.2677205716813216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106885901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7027338,0.0007178634,0.0009939333,0.0005081025,0.000331831,0.0003606499,0.000029485891,0.00009324638,0.29423106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954376,0.0003120488,0.00031320032,0.00040617114,0.0004707126,0.000018160907,0.000011779183,0.000014113017,0.003016211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982599,0.00021327368,0.00020704546,0.00032504078,0.00039752436,0.0005972421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990593,0.0000820816,0.000086856686,0.00015072332,0.0003164921,0.00030450485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022492236,0.00015261682,0.00019592085,0.0001238767,0.0010799359,0.00006143942,0.00009424872,0.00010691895,0.000094612165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066371766,0.00015171032,0.00006395285,0.0001854904,0.0005046897,0.00016280646,0.000031312655,0.0001569152,0.000028710147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060407046,0.00008162339,0.017542746,0.0000105680265,0.00009988442,0.000018298806,0.34194937,0.000013888408,0.00016120948,0.6379266,0.002167733,0.000022074875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011760539,0.00011333977,0.16827337,0.0000092962055,0.00014935658,0.00017143143,0.5189775,0.0003820968,0.0022660284,0.28797838,0.019646564,0.0008565472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017014178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053378404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3499482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032699524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059102714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98953164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112203224","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000146","title":"The Victoria Schuck Award: A Sonata for Gender Politics Scholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Scholarship; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.18539212987691503,"score_gpt":0.3826757345871186,"score_spread":0.1972836047102036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112203224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16974676,0.0028053138,0.013943129,0.0075894115,0.012605632,0.0034091484,0.0004887408,0.00064644666,0.78876543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98590285,0.00013342721,0.0023488775,0.0010093284,0.0021367131,0.00008688305,0.0000229462,0.000056641784,0.008302317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996572,0.00028918972,0.00042799188,0.0004123364,0.0007066267,0.0015918278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977234,0.00042190345,0.00014394819,0.0005922107,0.0005757042,0.0005428302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012067308,0.0002414025,0.00019877077,0.00010442226,0.0024854473,0.00030023014,0.0007075186,0.00025279238,0.00012064771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070649775,0.00019778183,0.00021872176,0.00018718594,0.0005575193,0.0002454671,0.00012395301,0.00028599132,0.00011562233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005497366,0.00006046402,0.006203663,0.000024242827,0.00008770773,0.000002120869,0.027166106,8.836119e-7,0.000020159609,0.96346414,0.0028142298,0.00015078137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042397503,0.000027139236,0.018450722,0.0000046178675,0.00008830191,0.000003949855,0.020031517,0.000049147315,0.0004488388,0.6766201,0.2835434,0.00030823934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018149192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017023356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030410915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092089124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116128980","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000134","title":"State Structures and The Politics of Child Care","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Child care; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.055069589736286804,"score_gpt":0.32688737208247115,"score_spread":0.27181778234618437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116128980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3116122,0.0029000985,0.000016144942,0.0022582575,0.0004417786,0.00031053738,0.00009673601,0.000046718094,0.68231755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724716,0.0004658363,0.00006491299,0.00093218184,0.00044542432,0.000003853986,9.609466e-7,0.000008129518,0.00083152397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990732,0.000110969195,0.00014885886,0.00009320984,0.00020164586,0.00037211916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995364,0.00008067311,0.00006552776,0.000116222356,0.000112840906,0.000088348854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014640785,0.000086408654,0.00015361061,0.000031317202,0.00089721725,0.00001518749,0.00014311227,0.00005950533,0.000018117402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011961067,0.00005280917,0.00006145314,0.00007223767,0.0018504449,0.00003968341,0.0000697808,0.000099579665,0.0000019442355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002687676,0.000003983771,0.0015795863,0.000013918358,0.0000353952,2.829731e-7,0.30602747,1.3492419e-7,2.404174e-7,0.6921083,0.00010095684,0.00012710968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038361142,0.000012594371,0.035617508,0.000004646793,0.000049299455,9.906198e-7,0.15586017,7.374815e-7,0.00020674686,0.8033421,0.004417103,0.000104514824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012709827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042550845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.685635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030052479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092680486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117131052","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x13000536","title":"Peace Accords and the Adoption of Electoral Quotas for Women in the Developing World, 1990–2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Parliament; Democracy; Political science; Authoritarianism; Representation (politics); Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05648163916646806,"score_gpt":0.34752212669426114,"score_spread":0.2910404875277931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117131052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545694,0.00025296138,0.0036043243,0.006180058,0.00029255252,0.00067590206,0.000012413002,0.000017286526,0.03439509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997392,0.000030275043,0.0004182831,0.00065936364,0.00029384493,0.000051106406,0.0000045075467,0.000006850765,0.0011437819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874526,0.0002972804,0.00018088787,0.00011494226,0.0002247817,0.0004368364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992373,0.00043879612,0.000072733266,0.00012289516,0.000079392266,0.000048871585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016146881,0.00006828076,0.000114009104,0.00006686635,0.00026334723,0.00006228949,0.00016463839,0.000039432252,0.0000053244635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021804748,0.00004345124,0.000036061203,0.00016810143,0.00026031065,0.000053695454,0.00002558646,0.00007365366,0.0000015022648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007497822,0.000012704967,0.012947968,0.000024089217,0.00000987352,6.576877e-8,0.046225194,0.000012367026,0.00001104254,0.9401076,0.00030228423,0.00033933794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017599645,0.00003734174,0.20028886,0.000014492032,0.00003829918,0.0000019813676,0.085046545,0.0009526508,0.00011228532,0.60409385,0.1074105,0.00024323282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032332472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016265613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33601373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010460577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001651282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48877242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124360880","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000062","title":"Confining Social Insecurity: Neoliberalism and the Rise of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century Debtors' Prison","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Prison; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Development economics; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.03590517751402692,"score_gpt":0.23603898802035247,"score_spread":0.20013381050632556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124360880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392147,0.009162905,0.00011324492,0.0016579588,0.0007085618,0.00027866985,0.00023126887,0.00003070667,0.048601996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953961,0.00050080003,0.00012862083,0.0023063319,0.00078406674,0.000016550666,0.000006236591,0.000043109918,0.0008181953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823576,0.00009130475,0.0006149708,0.00026676216,0.00009237244,0.0006988258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989283,0.00011310873,0.00040224468,0.00038958466,0.000045860234,0.000120880286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061613263,0.00022796464,0.00048609628,0.000093558745,0.00038947616,0.00006497249,0.00030921955,0.00019076685,0.00010406296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004195301,0.00017670853,0.00020540971,0.0001722161,0.00054987386,0.00022202877,0.00018586243,0.00032664125,0.00003481151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013027422,0.000061150626,0.017508557,0.000039680235,0.0000615079,5.1661414e-7,0.045138508,0.0000068136355,0.0000026684793,0.9352594,0.0016339977,0.00027418396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025307534,0.000019828645,0.066723056,0.000021767079,0.000075346354,0.000024812765,0.0013693997,0.001634386,0.00012706699,0.075547144,0.8514155,0.0005109499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094714004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007474884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85971224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007281135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047014597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7205965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125392551","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000342","title":"Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":609,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1468953851633293,"score_gpt":0.3777007126249193,"score_spread":0.23080532746158997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125392551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184937,0.00043944042,0.00064225687,0.0014585261,0.0005041812,0.00022456261,0.000084053754,0.00008401028,0.07806928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290603,0.0004993732,0.00055580516,0.0006010166,0.0007290472,0.000028779523,0.000044775563,0.000024710005,0.0046104575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761504,0.00023335757,0.0002863149,0.0004583499,0.00058439904,0.00082256604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987808,0.00016446532,0.00010906347,0.00030115785,0.0002005977,0.00044395452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023272638,0.00017700587,0.00021264449,0.00010833061,0.0010701328,0.00009625885,0.00017576167,0.0001385964,0.0005983816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013771531,0.00018451904,0.00007724689,0.00022443586,0.000575388,0.00020961734,0.00008148505,0.00016118975,0.000067190645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008107779,0.00012338256,0.09901517,0.000012132438,0.00016270102,0.000060949136,0.30935696,0.000012669573,0.00025997643,0.58730555,0.0034868147,0.00019556319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010280327,0.000025575153,0.43790293,0.0000067006786,0.0000862554,0.000026065847,0.21300192,0.00015309129,0.0009873682,0.3017042,0.044433646,0.00064422254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003725271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009211976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33888775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019806052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037456542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82307047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136536380","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x08000469","title":"The Gender Gap in Self-Perceived Understanding of Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Politics; Feminism; Socioeconomic status; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Population; Law","score_opus":0.11108743685845206,"score_gpt":0.31517422751675034,"score_spread":0.20408679065829827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136536380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828325,0.00025104624,0.000068118265,0.0018870651,0.00019075724,0.0002810956,0.000017282217,0.000011976578,0.01446018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976188,0.0013580888,0.00004491804,0.0006049595,0.0000756484,0.000008425876,0.000008668045,0.000013105536,0.00026738486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977939,0.00047968756,0.0003761417,0.0001681038,0.00047708448,0.0007050802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985346,0.00092734466,0.00009397016,0.00019961865,0.00009974776,0.00014468825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005871939,0.00012340855,0.00017960943,0.00013099123,0.0006689126,0.00003994496,0.00021386598,0.000063213774,0.000010812576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001567157,0.000084154744,0.000035922232,0.00034614708,0.00078423484,0.000054394128,0.000056786987,0.00019580495,7.2960535e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048524375,0.000021660111,0.107471004,0.000017507407,0.000031540032,0.000009867046,0.1128321,0.00032413343,0.0000029265586,0.7790304,0.00025052595,0.0000035230846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015755433,0.000009219243,0.23715779,0.000011589533,0.000031569332,0.000010803828,0.42553273,0.004355627,0.000031389714,0.32865402,0.0023939102,0.00023580389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96077186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78622866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45037633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011426685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019356065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5144803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140912625","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000279","title":"Judging Alone: Reflections on the Importance of Women on the Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Position (finance); Law; Political science; Solitude; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09326621534670063,"score_gpt":0.3628824125046064,"score_spread":0.26961619715790575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140912625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58961874,0.000019997542,0.000009263114,0.020695543,0.00033634139,0.00008491938,0.000008209768,0.00001601573,0.389211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453706,0.000023857321,0.000013093703,0.0044221194,0.00047538022,0.000024871713,3.4045078e-7,0.0000033263223,0.0004999606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915695,0.000055192286,0.000101368845,0.000089917594,0.0002901065,0.0003064513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993128,0.0003616707,0.000048869806,0.0001405408,0.000082935665,0.000053182208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053516595,0.0000574532,0.00007187463,0.000018426423,0.0012651377,0.000020714931,0.00016552919,0.000034608358,0.00024867617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040665243,0.000032792555,0.000040082065,0.00012679839,0.0007045094,0.00002173139,0.000025658055,0.0001947272,0.00004172898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015501643,0.000023883671,0.0031122805,5.4204213e-7,0.000020957372,3.4719508e-7,0.00848039,0.000001972195,0.00009574575,0.98659164,0.0016434791,0.000027233571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006453692,0.000026220609,0.027997555,0.000007035627,0.000014976993,7.6394736e-7,0.02926692,0.0000042216707,0.0003305078,0.7220665,0.220113,0.00010777277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015443974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001478083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40491834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010381679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020195241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9730544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141895619","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000079","title":"Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing “Flexible” Voters in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Voting; Incentive; Politics; Consciousness; Political science; Proportional representation; Style (visual arts); Social psychology; General election; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.10717869931512064,"score_gpt":0.33838170385092253,"score_spread":0.2312030045358019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141895619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342432,0.00023255862,0.00015367294,0.00014020473,0.0011379588,0.00044702875,0.0000097380225,0.000025204377,0.06361044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987195,0.000010469609,0.00016838571,0.0005390563,0.00018366166,0.000034254706,0.000006191764,0.000024801106,0.00031369185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968727,0.00062470284,0.0004910396,0.0003810109,0.00052197726,0.0011085402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989767,0.00031342264,0.00011210983,0.00026155871,0.00007091807,0.00026525455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006733437,0.00020359711,0.00029202414,0.00034282944,0.00014016485,0.000102126105,0.0002748875,0.00016029173,0.000018474931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021613536,0.00021659546,0.00004454658,0.00043762094,0.00011057758,0.00030401105,0.00006842181,0.00034098068,0.0000074055797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026304867,0.000113085465,0.9340637,0.00015338427,0.000014751023,0.00009639091,0.024602285,0.0002520889,0.000023924222,0.040434368,0.00011336521,0.00013006006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070350524,0.000007929127,0.9719634,0.00006286232,0.0000125465485,0.0000026045761,0.020065993,0.00055948674,0.000111144094,0.0055921236,0.0006187762,0.00029962795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99025065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9664882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0644763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020363969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029555955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88325065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149786024","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x12000323","title":"Feminist and Gender-Neutral Frames in Contemporary Child-Care and Anti-Violence Policy Debates in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political science; State (computer science); Public policy; Perspective (graphical); Welfare state; Social policy; Gender studies; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06892212517497541,"score_gpt":0.36852191470095075,"score_spread":0.2995997895259753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149786024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832827,0.0056905374,9.078578e-7,0.004128483,0.0002812833,0.00014622229,0.000022875001,0.000012067862,0.10643493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960399,0.0005086647,0.000056663397,0.0029659558,0.00031737884,0.000008375802,0.0000055151163,0.000010074936,0.00008747179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875337,0.00022960495,0.00017782117,0.00015757179,0.00016431684,0.0005172976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992065,0.00032667458,0.000060130755,0.000088779314,0.000032044714,0.0002859119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002841022,0.00010671582,0.00014487913,0.0000869783,0.0003569601,0.00006210999,0.00009639952,0.000087370936,0.000043848373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033149542,0.0001178314,0.000014708965,0.00029748722,0.00018611118,0.00018359575,0.000035586854,0.0002071951,0.0000031655682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016606322,0.000022206468,0.7729654,0.000020043557,0.000005131715,0.0000019561962,0.064798206,4.7037045e-7,6.9046285e-7,0.16129328,0.00038823902,0.00050272676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018945201,0.0000036745241,0.7139275,0.000014650468,0.0000060810444,0.000002893188,0.22993164,0.000001880783,0.000022452377,0.0058472576,0.049884822,0.00016766254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86357063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50253993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3610307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003947181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002477097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5065374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160280749","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x10000073","title":"Global Householding amid Global Crises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Pooling; Sociocultural evolution; Politics; Order (exchange); Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Unit (ring theory); Reproduction; Sociology; Political economy; Economy; Geography; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05282907680598626,"score_gpt":0.33829756087689744,"score_spread":0.2854684840709112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160280749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7425266,0.00012578779,0.0013026743,0.00039213322,0.0026160064,0.00013149189,0.00020809377,0.0002452568,0.252452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428254,0.00006762976,0.0019501549,0.0015572743,0.0013002421,0.0000059893673,0.000010482247,0.000017946672,0.0008077106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771655,0.000090132104,0.000243627,0.0003467844,0.00057316414,0.0010297513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886346,0.000052794487,0.00007148275,0.00036294418,0.00018676609,0.00046253565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033457912,0.00020223873,0.00018901774,0.000033554206,0.00070304296,0.00020586778,0.00048328142,0.0002618806,0.00014177928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023034014,0.00021466444,0.00012118789,0.00038338648,0.0004413799,0.00017402838,0.00010342997,0.0002070606,0.00010070776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012526722,0.00005039233,0.2939436,0.000007585802,0.000021401684,0.000007405751,0.0029020975,0.000016575927,0.0000317847,0.7005102,0.0022842058,0.00022347228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004788322,0.000024951276,0.603742,0.0000059108297,0.00009118031,0.000016960601,0.026332775,0.00019405084,0.00001615916,0.2472488,0.12119515,0.0006532217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055045076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004154386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45326144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034818865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060436083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8753762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165081973","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000110","title":"Gender Policy and State Architecture in Latin America","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Decentralization; Authoritarianism; Legislature; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Democracy; Power (physics); Affect (linguistics); Political economy; State (computer science); Development economics; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09272889638088903,"score_gpt":0.34967143058576716,"score_spread":0.2569425342048781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165081973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5302906,0.00019576937,0.0013984818,0.00096922653,0.00017710017,0.00027452657,0.000029868643,0.000064752465,0.46659967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942373,0.00011811417,0.0017136737,0.0011061284,0.0002791034,0.000009699393,0.000004893705,0.000018595982,0.0025124915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840385,0.00017796448,0.00020900185,0.0002467519,0.000269032,0.0006933876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936694,0.00006935182,0.000059154754,0.0001750341,0.000057155237,0.00027238362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018697619,0.00012726101,0.00013830801,0.00023248303,0.00020461013,0.000047119134,0.00013570926,0.00007975451,0.00012717424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012580717,0.00012283896,0.000040996245,0.00024815096,0.00034752244,0.00007068698,0.00006600492,0.00016519123,0.00002657006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048868574,0.000081485974,0.052006926,0.000026477053,0.000029824061,0.000014963109,0.34466735,0.000026200596,0.000057453013,0.5995972,0.00021204592,0.0032751348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034742846,0.00002186833,0.35282424,0.0000045274614,0.000014731417,0.0000043053356,0.020549083,0.000058279547,0.00015033003,0.60499656,0.020749863,0.0002787837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027685532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071861414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4640872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011020634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003883305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171312640","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x14000646","title":"Party Quotas and Rising Women Politicians in Singapore","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.12216024532661057,"score_gpt":0.37386820027025575,"score_spread":0.2517079549436452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171312640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428248,0.00020202766,0.000090688925,0.0018070391,0.00031490275,0.00013938935,0.0000122202155,0.000042523403,0.15456636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965163,0.000021927292,0.00024695724,0.0008106701,0.0004340313,0.000009903227,0.0000056105428,0.000015231504,0.001939366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981325,0.00019432793,0.0002182787,0.00022187631,0.00035582331,0.00087714725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.00006521389,0.000049268627,0.00015130796,0.000106782696,0.00054501276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006683269,0.00010913021,0.00014762866,0.00012622665,0.0002254501,0.00011592001,0.00010413928,0.00010459921,0.000031119813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024957533,0.0001116755,0.00002545767,0.00015316361,0.000278114,0.00013690905,0.000052448402,0.000129821,0.000021445854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025807174,0.000065446504,0.074082516,0.000016723494,0.000015186213,0.000016181351,0.25506756,0.00002240201,0.000015897827,0.6694728,0.0008764106,0.0003462861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007275057,0.00003419608,0.040820856,0.000012110871,0.00001765718,0.000008516334,0.34460762,0.0002167462,0.0000692635,0.5605152,0.052641004,0.0003293259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008957805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048380837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15369146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004643403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005126155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219979124","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000446","title":"Gender and the Executive Branch","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Executive branch; Legislation; Public administration; Legislature; Law; History","score_opus":0.11354588238310358,"score_gpt":0.36542897716055295,"score_spread":0.25188309477744936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219979124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07754575,0.001208685,0.0014891902,0.003916794,0.0007518217,0.00037731457,0.000012551276,0.00006273187,0.9146352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917374,0.0000757326,0.00014669375,0.001477088,0.00060487137,0.000013306914,0.0000036029446,0.000011654757,0.005929634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984867,0.00029756653,0.0001504019,0.0001803391,0.0004263631,0.00045862183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911827,0.00015689406,0.0000480976,0.00018271232,0.00018835551,0.00030565527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007378691,0.00009573233,0.00011931954,0.000042361848,0.00042613508,0.00011769358,0.00015125948,0.000078768564,0.00003280806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023487913,0.00006769747,0.000050058195,0.000101401776,0.00078013574,0.00009112569,0.00006890524,0.00011349397,0.000042648615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004491867,0.000012996254,0.0020016676,0.0000040602017,0.000025584317,0.0000012022545,0.10265538,0.0000050481817,0.0000027994208,0.89084846,0.0043495996,0.00008869536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001271223,0.000008436538,0.007754988,0.000001730801,0.000050983374,0.000007646779,0.09194155,0.00012895674,0.00006105882,0.81582785,0.08278102,0.00016459342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033559145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050969913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91419166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008133381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003647512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313820225","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x11000092","title":"Gender and State Architectures: The Impact of Governance Structures on Women's Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scholarship; Ideology; Politics; State (computer science); Corporate governance; Power (physics); Unitary state; Political economy; Opportunity structures; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06223646900126362,"score_gpt":0.3417709901097295,"score_spread":0.2795345211084659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313820225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91913086,0.00017463595,0.00009216542,0.00009392456,0.0001758801,0.00021721773,0.00012674164,0.000025642894,0.07996294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824435,0.000094505966,0.00016158629,0.000382494,0.00025013945,0.0000098379105,0.0000025321372,0.000023145894,0.00083141413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979633,0.00021459592,0.0002600536,0.0002458708,0.0004767186,0.0008394803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889845,0.00017240371,0.00015833255,0.00034404598,0.00012497333,0.00030181307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028626094,0.0001911121,0.00018957118,0.000067228575,0.00040788818,0.000052539566,0.0002811617,0.000087003464,0.00021485369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014231584,0.00012641602,0.00011106502,0.000120133445,0.00069778325,0.000045726374,0.00007001885,0.00020281576,0.0000063697853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011102892,0.000059234913,0.009224289,0.000023895065,0.00012690807,0.00000319738,0.2021394,0.000122052035,0.000041738243,0.7876329,0.00026856796,0.0003467013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020473609,0.00007597888,0.43033394,0.0000034863158,0.000017693921,0.0000043232676,0.013551895,0.000034142453,0.0004184615,0.5546361,0.00056539534,0.00015381137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012629264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049212198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42110965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022162899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042760954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321510021","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x14000622","title":"Introduction: Quotas and Non-Quota Strategies in East Asia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Politics; Convergence (economics); Norm (philosophy); Representation (politics); Ethos; East Asia; Development economics; Economic growth; Political economy; China; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07700584714882344,"score_gpt":0.35195177218546203,"score_spread":0.2749459250366386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321510021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5620675,0.0003851123,0.0005054369,0.016126119,0.0013192997,0.00028406348,0.000010708799,0.000059390215,0.41924238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946421,0.000024216952,0.00033112432,0.00013044725,0.0018406317,0.0000075540484,0.000007610519,0.0000098542,0.0030064743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878496,0.00010542289,0.00017016983,0.00021751331,0.00029947158,0.0004224348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994026,0.000018360464,0.000038544084,0.00015226795,0.00012637839,0.00026189623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038148963,0.00009213272,0.00011031263,0.00009651209,0.00015522822,0.00016095668,0.000096300704,0.00008393125,0.00005557106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008593496,0.00009263592,0.000022659842,0.00015065582,0.00024461377,0.00021907019,0.00004143356,0.00011262908,0.000041390675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026776688,0.000046551173,0.015693381,0.000014014783,0.000013413996,0.000006128612,0.07028107,0.00006823071,0.00003254328,0.9065541,0.0071232766,0.0001646057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066545047,0.000038251765,0.06374257,0.0000056918,0.000025784564,0.00001381218,0.53167987,0.00023636052,0.000087368855,0.30266753,0.10053033,0.00030700583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041190055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064820406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012818525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052403787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62267315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323919086","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x1200075x","title":"The Retelling of Tales: Disentangling the Feminist Evolutionary Analytic Approach, Legal Pluralism, and Gender Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Phenomenon; Pluralism (philosophy); Dominance (genetics); Plural; Inequality; Legal pluralism; Gender inequality; Sociology; Criminology; Family law; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Epistemology; Legal realism; Legal profession","score_opus":0.06978202686042317,"score_gpt":0.31962316735826934,"score_spread":0.24984114049784617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323919086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6027647,0.013875972,0.0012187876,0.005090525,0.0012007485,0.00091929064,0.00008409304,0.00014639845,0.37469947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677944,0.00057128526,0.00048119517,0.0003012098,0.0003835792,0.000023775072,0.000006491413,0.000012400435,0.0014406423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981281,0.00023953135,0.0003154648,0.00026563133,0.00050644274,0.0005448155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.0005369569,0.00013652649,0.00029941936,0.00013970041,0.0001668649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057695596,0.0001526985,0.00015941839,0.00006045881,0.0016541118,0.00024027021,0.00040511473,0.000089072106,0.000040061324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012328762,0.00009183153,0.00010877508,0.0002860349,0.0014417394,0.00016364374,0.00009569543,0.00020122748,0.0000071166746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036571134,0.000044627635,0.016807009,0.00005825412,0.000149575,0.0000013196155,0.045139544,0.00006706728,0.0000061807027,0.93445534,0.0019379372,0.0013295109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046508692,0.000050050887,0.09339109,0.000028439821,0.0008793122,0.000030127447,0.5889717,0.0146649275,0.00001928134,0.24086848,0.05992426,0.000707281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013582498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121568846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040650386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001668019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328460664","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x1000036x","title":"Analyzing Institutional Persistence: The Case of the Ministry of Women's Affairs in Aotearoa/New Zealand","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Christian ministry; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Political science; Restructuring; Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04091293366167028,"score_gpt":0.31795573353379963,"score_spread":0.2770427998721294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328460664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98002094,0.000021878504,0.000009469731,0.0016893423,0.00034764444,0.00010216075,0.000014940365,0.000004014663,0.017789591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544466,0.0000060927923,0.0000875183,0.000055888486,0.00018892158,0.0000033337644,0.0000012001864,0.000004029751,0.004208343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900746,0.000102513484,0.00020708572,0.000112290276,0.00022691977,0.00034371906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993717,0.00011197505,0.00009721064,0.0002187956,0.000084280255,0.0001160168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005003929,0.00006395479,0.00009900896,0.00005177448,0.00023978522,0.000022084148,0.00022810441,0.00008085706,0.00008591787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002162759,0.000041775715,0.00007638643,0.00020731601,0.00070691796,0.000047176134,0.000054485336,0.00018928069,0.0000016238218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041852027,0.00010408912,0.102078624,0.000035217403,0.000053029285,0.000024995494,0.28601944,0.0001552639,0.001017938,0.6097372,0.0005263666,0.00024366402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008843693,0.0000314053,0.18104713,0.000026228363,0.00008812775,0.0001780685,0.5385475,0.00033033642,0.0024938758,0.2657714,0.010287575,0.00031398446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014135294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021089816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3439658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098863966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008900638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336403513","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000155","title":"Julia Gillard and the Gender Wars","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Metaphor; Newspaper; Gender studies; Power (physics); Allegory; Political science; Prime minister; Sociology; Law; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0624751045624428,"score_gpt":0.3223703708744206,"score_spread":0.2598952663119778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336403513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28196135,0.002602377,0.0014433278,0.017216478,0.0026690217,0.00066331105,0.000053040625,0.00020945935,0.69318163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777966,0.00096322637,0.00016900811,0.0027868657,0.0008665675,0.000015817759,0.0000011127394,0.000018081133,0.017382728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982116,0.00022789942,0.00018595168,0.0002449473,0.00044197516,0.00068759423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988682,0.00038738403,0.000055906694,0.00027583158,0.00009232316,0.00032033562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007977288,0.00013627857,0.00016785401,0.000041742045,0.0005010848,0.000057735135,0.00024381053,0.00012577532,0.0002710181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035859866,0.00007582792,0.000083592255,0.00008444348,0.0010307115,0.00008635093,0.0000766765,0.00009760989,0.00017684691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011676519,0.000018611256,0.0033043541,0.000011193453,0.000051488685,0.0000047031526,0.114975676,1.4037639e-7,0.00006106585,0.8671443,0.012060181,0.0023566103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001621178,0.000015709005,0.009060626,0.0000074765794,0.000082749735,0.000009507352,0.044394765,0.0000034407137,0.00023943499,0.21914186,0.72513956,0.0002836726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034016388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000702197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7130794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007957103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027652696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38539898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345965789","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000131","title":"Do Women and Men Respond Differently to Negative News?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Skin conductance; Arousal; Neuropsychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Cognition; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.11243303950275291,"score_gpt":0.4246122158380769,"score_spread":0.312179176335324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345965789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546628,0.00008951639,0.00022506437,0.0019529038,0.00032923344,0.00020295741,0.00012371893,0.000033899047,0.042379934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461762,0.000006941773,0.00011813744,0.0014279684,0.00015172224,0.00010179799,0.0000016193919,0.000018422686,0.051997196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987172,0.000108658925,0.00021307179,0.00026003705,0.0000977146,0.0006033378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999038,0.000089786154,0.00003846776,0.00028466593,0.00005239568,0.0004966963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098612945,0.00011610985,0.00013882418,0.00010886923,0.00008050085,0.000021696207,0.000102462305,0.00007993994,0.004161291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003611841,0.00008227844,0.000038253747,0.000067844434,0.000063377905,0.00004998701,0.00006344556,0.00008087378,0.0008095244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038912546,0.00060412777,0.097714044,0.000038586433,0.00015172502,0.000028262692,0.06896627,3.5681612e-8,0.001320927,0.5966633,0.12879424,0.105329365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014226206,0.000530548,0.8909145,0.00002972306,0.000019122772,0.00001232128,0.0063347723,3.4746196e-7,0.00019059649,0.04403431,0.0562584,0.00025276706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025513876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015043941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79320043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014485237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030946812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404729571","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000234","title":"Just the Facts? Media Coverage of Female and Male High Court Appointees in Five Democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media coverage; Political science; Variation (astronomy); News media; Law; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.05281048631499318,"score_gpt":0.3021888606153184,"score_spread":0.24937837430032522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404729571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8902046,0.00061870087,0.000106441985,0.0062475954,0.00020049309,0.0001063339,0.00008128679,0.0000111844765,0.10242334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971215,0.0005745815,0.000025098414,0.000292487,0.00017369869,0.000005513805,7.692803e-7,0.0000027854987,0.0018035575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923754,0.000063159605,0.0001299823,0.00010209111,0.00022513061,0.0002420916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993222,0.00044442943,0.000042930445,0.000064383166,0.00007548851,0.00005062046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002044396,0.00006425638,0.00011925904,0.000027992828,0.00028072044,0.000014379545,0.00010485793,0.000039869246,0.00023747835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029641856,0.0000381347,0.000026581676,0.000070159265,0.0011599533,0.00007300406,0.000065207765,0.000045536217,0.000024362667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035945254,0.000020052783,0.06337101,0.0000049001574,0.000019554807,0.0000029226262,0.015591684,0.0000011233739,0.000041306048,0.91964644,0.0007632586,0.0005341622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036110144,0.000017039985,0.57596964,0.000038707385,0.000030819203,0.0000031877414,0.041958425,0.0000014436923,0.00024262416,0.3623958,0.018822566,0.0001586479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059618843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002579445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5572506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052232226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013409174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9012626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405550332","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000039","title":"Context and Media Frames: The Case of Liberia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Presidential system; Context (archaeology); Political science; Media coverage; Gender studies; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06555992134806152,"score_gpt":0.3487911517612996,"score_spread":0.28323123041323806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405550332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496681,0.0004956517,0.0004725295,0.006330119,0.00044581844,0.00016401667,0.00004999732,0.000022716067,0.042351067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786323,0.0001082844,0.00007779381,0.00038980626,0.00027805733,0.000004255463,6.3988085e-7,0.0000070093406,0.0012709217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992197,0.00012538576,0.00014045055,0.00011003642,0.0001385715,0.00026584836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990913,0.00047266518,0.00005331771,0.00015650531,0.000097997385,0.00012816142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002598567,0.000059251342,0.00008234764,0.000028758313,0.0002205203,0.000027023327,0.000091054804,0.00006249304,0.00013340428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026422157,0.000032597447,0.000033288157,0.000049348622,0.0005865055,0.000055769116,0.000038327227,0.00004142182,0.000012268257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6953554e-7,0.000012151079,0.0020114789,0.0000063130587,0.000018410294,0.000016174625,0.055773117,7.584481e-8,0.00009747939,0.9378275,0.00080922217,0.003427201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006422915,0.000025188596,0.013206088,0.000018005625,0.00007317878,0.00011119782,0.21112385,0.000019546429,0.0016493007,0.7253272,0.047576565,0.0002275553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047840783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006036552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21250029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002622468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012499951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2444597018","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000574","title":"Women on Corporate Boards: A Comparison of Parliamentary Discourse in the United Kingdom and France","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislation; Legislature; Political science; Kingdom; Directive; Gender balance; Commission; Corporate law; European commission; Corporate governance; Political economy; Public administration; Accounting; Law; Business; European union; Sociology; Gender studies; International trade","score_opus":0.2865987547184954,"score_gpt":0.3753449196243615,"score_spread":0.08874616490586612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2444597018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932486,0.000021791262,0.0000906946,0.0028233307,0.00008214392,0.00011233105,0.000041375697,0.0000091624415,0.0035705983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860823,0.000020525047,0.00002925114,0.001087905,0.000055680994,0.0000040921136,0.0000026300395,0.0000030967697,0.00018856973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988038,0.00031830475,0.0001479711,0.00012751327,0.00029212405,0.00031030524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994484,0.0001847055,0.00010607894,0.00014612502,0.00003682238,0.00007786332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062400877,0.00006947655,0.00012699656,0.000064095664,0.00018419961,0.000019849198,0.00018477759,0.000046313828,0.000071493276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055629047,0.000044412398,0.000021318632,0.00015463949,0.0005104493,0.00007753933,0.000035042143,0.000077895405,0.000009626346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015531354,0.00018958369,0.57097703,0.000015920794,0.000017679935,0.0000023501166,0.16298804,0.0000057168777,0.000038586844,0.26439446,0.0009195515,0.00043555655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011537158,0.00014902145,0.50346035,0.00004888275,0.000025323563,3.3097226e-7,0.38777316,0.00003579128,0.00020087573,0.08234347,0.024559487,0.0002496105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006354308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026298154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22478512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008628501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067988534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96058553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475171680","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000477","title":"Women's Transnational Activism, Norm Cascades, and Quota Adoption in The Developing World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Beijing; China; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Developing country; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0776937338099527,"score_gpt":0.3379499118446452,"score_spread":0.2602561780346925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475171680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9322132,0.00004441065,0.0019694404,0.029513104,0.0001969388,0.0002111018,0.000014389519,0.000023905455,0.03581351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972215,0.000042253545,0.00022874819,0.00083661306,0.00021068894,0.000027317197,0.0000025866514,0.00000719125,0.0014230605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879646,0.00015043168,0.00014429216,0.00015483605,0.00033300061,0.00042099238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951404,0.00023695457,0.00003587919,0.00008779501,0.000043286003,0.000082050836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004375038,0.00007637964,0.00007121556,0.000117815565,0.00026270267,0.00006559449,0.00011832657,0.00005222904,0.00004504442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037870996,0.000049294464,0.00002186618,0.00016991934,0.00016274111,0.00015451042,0.000015571468,0.00007382715,0.000004379661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014286043,0.000016939026,0.0072553214,0.0000067020674,0.000007934911,0.0000015128824,0.04186547,9.833789e-7,0.00008986786,0.9497494,0.00008664782,0.0009177524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063104025,0.000013041544,0.54929996,0.000012958562,0.000013084596,0.000007001009,0.042009708,0.000023967907,0.0001899144,0.33690226,0.07063014,0.00026691187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000337857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090899237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6128472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023656906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024473993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20205231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535741930","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000544","title":"Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype threat; Politics; Social psychology; Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Anxiety; Identity (music); Political psychology; Order (exchange); Cognition; Political science; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11781557245917168,"score_gpt":0.3780742860863044,"score_spread":0.2602587136271327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535741930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.908443,0.00019278792,0.0032796846,0.004650747,0.0005133488,0.0002809201,0.000030205618,0.00012419776,0.08248512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559474,0.000046611847,0.000532225,0.0017064939,0.0006841602,0.000017502673,0.000009096261,0.000024229605,0.0013849519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789923,0.00023178277,0.00022749495,0.00035425412,0.00041919074,0.0008680631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884725,0.00013092937,0.000051168703,0.00025995122,0.00012157885,0.00058914855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028944615,0.00015442661,0.00014954364,0.00009406902,0.00042842524,0.00013574303,0.00013298464,0.0001337278,0.0002127157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076800054,0.00012104545,0.00003875488,0.00006796186,0.0004149147,0.00029316498,0.00006823835,0.00007506039,0.000034509267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004543647,0.00006436095,0.012727409,0.000010404218,0.000022418775,0.0000043370633,0.013388366,3.7227844e-7,0.0017781488,0.97046894,0.00066185783,0.00086886366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026107351,0.00050031266,0.14299127,0.00008978116,0.00016851859,0.00003561254,0.17210276,0.00013057006,0.013189794,0.59740627,0.06934736,0.0014270087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032755646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011086091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37306264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022478697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015148286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49516958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571847123","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x16000684","title":"Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Western University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Electoral system; Parliament; Legislature; Voting; Proportional representation; Representation (politics); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Politics; Communication; Democracy","score_opus":0.09256334293386646,"score_gpt":0.3913990247997294,"score_spread":0.2988356818658629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571847123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9216365,0.0004686005,0.0035287377,0.002657146,0.0026795345,0.0023141198,0.0006354413,0.00010167916,0.06597819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719054,0.000015423228,0.00026219158,0.00012654893,0.0008385203,0.00017456264,0.000021543125,0.000016413604,0.026639396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.000029377281,0.00015123875,0.00020351486,0.00015980942,0.0006731759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991547,0.00012706527,0.00010401507,0.00021771478,0.00016536201,0.0002311774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003901618,0.000094485,0.00014691554,0.000040672847,0.0014182857,0.0004307164,0.00017648101,0.000084658204,0.000015947799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026237816,0.00009013855,0.000048025395,0.000014827503,0.00022635862,0.00013029942,0.000033841963,0.000036985042,0.000004165074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011761942,0.000043534663,0.05737312,0.00025103032,0.000087187946,0.0000011945864,0.026900837,0.0000046628434,0.00014770514,0.9108227,0.0039989497,0.00035732822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00251525,0.00034563473,0.060777914,0.000020868982,0.0001403869,0.000009035376,0.066438206,0.0021762752,0.0021754138,0.26133007,0.6031556,0.0009153096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003086188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025386343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6494926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011001078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027217265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606211833","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000173","title":"Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Edited by Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 304 pp. $100 (hardcover).","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08370536329733332,"score_gpt":0.32016864893233277,"score_spread":0.23646328563499946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606211833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5802002,0.3454585,0.0012577296,0.013114376,0.0035307775,0.0018677234,0.0008365667,0.00038493297,0.053349216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818001,0.013024627,0.0005343153,0.0011573628,0.0014123283,0.00001068015,0.00010815025,0.000048038262,0.0019044145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970209,0.00024201539,0.00038973594,0.0006245781,0.00072561525,0.0009971735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977462,0.00014072354,0.00014525352,0.00032284914,0.00022456775,0.0014203485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053267664,0.0003397517,0.00035680892,0.000084335545,0.00049732416,0.00028690902,0.0002022492,0.00030016783,0.0000738368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014877408,0.00033198277,0.000064447755,0.0002159847,0.00058697024,0.00009371002,0.00015359692,0.0002318701,0.000027007814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000301116,0.00006817807,0.030959113,0.00012852895,0.00025793043,0.000041765823,0.057047058,0.000010317121,0.00024037348,0.2627601,0.6454228,0.0030336976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032855913,0.00017742412,0.033327922,0.000030927997,0.000330872,0.000100571975,0.033325557,0.00063515245,0.00029615287,0.50927764,0.4179014,0.0013108207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016085563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030299905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40159988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013785306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004814083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606229170","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x15000392","title":"Resisting Parity: Gender and Cabinet Appointments in Chile and Spain","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parity (physics); Dominance (genetics); Status quo; Politics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.1344248107729453,"score_gpt":0.3656062068777426,"score_spread":0.2311813961047973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606229170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82307464,0.00075512263,0.0001552089,0.00091001426,0.00022647846,0.00025874216,0.000015253943,0.000038425216,0.17456609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730116,0.00006213138,0.00063968106,0.00040947992,0.00025078503,0.000008614974,0.000009593856,0.000012393819,0.0013061613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856806,0.00020597708,0.00019102202,0.00024683136,0.0002991195,0.0004890152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933404,0.00007849018,0.000047468675,0.00012423664,0.00006731828,0.0003484349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007479493,0.000104405386,0.00013134009,0.00009769128,0.00025839175,0.00009879615,0.000060343307,0.00009180094,0.000015613146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002547827,0.00010610946,0.000017721768,0.00010137031,0.00020134042,0.00009955213,0.00008385802,0.00011123515,0.0000075598473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052916002,0.00009008511,0.3589804,0.000055945726,0.000034539597,0.000025036708,0.087466694,0.000018680386,0.00002761769,0.5510529,0.0016122324,0.00063056825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015071806,0.000037883678,0.46533525,0.000017008915,0.000047879425,0.00001849439,0.09100433,0.00087168044,0.000056248253,0.42094836,0.019703502,0.0004521948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077122534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004153876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17422651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011565567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771049538","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000484","title":"From the Colonial to Feminist IR: Feminist IR Studies, the Wider FSS/GPE Research Agenda, and the Questions of Value, Valuation, Security, and Violence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Valuation (finance); Constitution; Politics; Commodification; Feminist theory; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Economy; Economics","score_opus":0.21012639053930657,"score_gpt":0.46822523733412946,"score_spread":0.25809884679482287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771049538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87406605,0.009771617,0.00003685661,0.07568788,0.0009556438,0.0015282097,0.00027051428,0.00003584482,0.037647374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441075,0.0015830423,0.000058472015,0.0023413603,0.0009694981,0.000083678795,0.0000030700064,0.000014129277,0.00053598254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637777,0.0013263139,0.0003377913,0.00037879765,0.0009894074,0.0005899034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569464,0.0025195652,0.0001714011,0.00085964875,0.0005752477,0.00017947171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005144117,0.0001690852,0.00025461288,0.000037970196,0.0065275417,0.00064219616,0.0010576076,0.00010133794,0.000024592093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035823067,0.00009941572,0.00007161386,0.00014889562,0.0057296287,0.000096332,0.000717857,0.00038578786,0.000014363316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019901261,0.000037003483,0.010786551,0.000013355723,0.00010093827,0.0000018747548,0.36847693,0.0000011804185,0.0000069638313,0.61442375,0.005766383,0.00036512886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064325373,0.00005655534,0.08193815,0.0000578261,0.00015142327,0.0000045709735,0.21235166,0.00008816549,0.00003791075,0.6003409,0.10413941,0.00019015445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059052028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15612528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008839198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060919835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784324061","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000526","title":"Stories from the Front Lines: Making Sense of Gender Mainstreaming in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender mainstreaming; Mainstreaming; Narrative; Technocracy; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Resistance (ecology); Work (physics); Mainstream; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration; Gender equality; Engineering","score_opus":0.08222544578080214,"score_gpt":0.34492011597450445,"score_spread":0.2626946701937023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784324061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524472,0.00026147772,0.00041032574,0.0007322613,0.0010215602,0.00015530929,0.00011029097,0.000013602672,0.044848017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997319,0.000021659249,0.00040077383,0.00075524836,0.0011058181,0.0000040741647,0.000008850365,0.000013010733,0.00037159192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983624,0.00019504411,0.000282625,0.00019081247,0.0004626278,0.0005064592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991071,0.0002704444,0.00010296661,0.00025008543,0.00017791711,0.000091482965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026683073,0.00010706831,0.00014315969,0.000041126757,0.00031507702,0.000036972047,0.00018017652,0.00006311232,0.0001403924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018340448,0.0000866944,0.00004053834,0.00011444546,0.0002966383,0.000060358172,0.00006210539,0.000111798014,0.0000058535675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272563,0.000050776875,0.40354946,0.00002818864,0.00010915782,0.000025470768,0.34849235,0.00009873752,0.00015947546,0.2426043,0.0041470397,0.0007267829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000457116,0.000014426983,0.36291993,0.00003675138,0.00006334805,0.0000028068298,0.53793275,0.00079708395,0.001045562,0.064289376,0.03207769,0.00036318804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18944038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005657402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021516096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38168633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792270211","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x17000319","title":"Women and the Orange Order: Female Activism, Diaspora and Empire in the British World, 1850–1940. By D. A. J. MacPherson. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016. 230 pp. $110.00 (hardback).","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Empire; Orange (colour); Order (exchange); Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Gender studies; Ancient history; Chemistry; Economics","score_opus":0.03390466658801979,"score_gpt":0.2667766484633348,"score_spread":0.23287198187531502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792270211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6236128,0.020502258,0.00012327207,0.0062660626,0.0006651208,0.0013324609,0.00020258885,0.00013511721,0.34716028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796064,0.0041471226,0.00006806802,0.0017115781,0.00041180593,0.000020992478,0.000004046835,0.000019965162,0.014010043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978713,0.00041615733,0.00018692603,0.00040338933,0.00037002494,0.0007521995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990606,0.000310898,0.00008256184,0.00026799002,0.0000862008,0.0001917921],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007085343,0.00020108321,0.00029662676,0.0000311597,0.0016617456,0.0002999851,0.00036587552,0.00011176877,0.00009304126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005288783,0.00016101946,0.00005188179,0.00030045607,0.002044881,0.00022866459,0.00017980562,0.00025621642,0.000017373168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072408824,0.000120461336,0.019373357,0.000056391404,0.000105381405,0.00003733163,0.77905715,1.1518345e-7,0.0000029701935,0.0050814226,0.19397266,0.0021203577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011512192,0.00003363408,0.023120508,0.000016098185,0.000047977996,0.000006052212,0.2182424,0.0000072308676,0.000003358658,0.0021232616,0.75496244,0.00028582214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005581609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001087024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56098974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024623808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113987255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795541401","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000016","title":"She's Married, She's Faithful, She's Dying: Politicizing the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Political science; Mandate; Public administration; Law; Politics; Ideology","score_opus":0.06444925298124908,"score_gpt":0.35295924183396243,"score_spread":0.28850998885271334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795541401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38168228,0.005302357,0.0024417383,0.010704006,0.0084212385,0.0020725676,0.00007177427,0.0006845789,0.5886195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682575,0.0003839284,0.00085620664,0.0011728165,0.0055647027,0.000070706374,0.000022189004,0.000073074276,0.023598919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625254,0.00029579425,0.0005567205,0.00053312856,0.00070372503,0.0016580924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980278,0.0003723153,0.00016702968,0.0005955994,0.00040551685,0.00043170826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010039282,0.00032447235,0.00030578868,0.00014548477,0.002541244,0.00023996059,0.0008575116,0.00036593975,0.0015194389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006007519,0.0002520557,0.000226349,0.00037816295,0.00079888396,0.00024220848,0.00015878056,0.00034661256,0.00026142536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042090942,0.00014519384,0.011302163,0.000075193784,0.00036201175,0.0000100858715,0.21272615,0.000018644289,0.0001820509,0.69502634,0.07905142,0.0010586753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056685857,0.00020929224,0.003205566,0.000049227798,0.0002617602,0.000008163942,0.09546418,0.00018924133,0.0010604088,0.1697926,0.7285299,0.00066279824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034115673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002606389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6494785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021113551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038270772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902393081","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000752","title":"Trump in Transnational Perspective: Insights from Global LGBT Politics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democratization; Queer; Lesbian; Transgender; Opposition (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.05249310714694997,"score_gpt":0.3729083599349547,"score_spread":0.3204152527880047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902393081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56615967,0.00018635877,0.0008882382,0.006475527,0.0008912308,0.00021867962,0.00017164147,0.000067583016,0.4249411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565905,0.000013467093,0.0006505052,0.0010856086,0.0017777376,0.000008503837,0.000025764297,0.000014868264,0.0007645136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978248,0.00021163072,0.00028629194,0.00036243894,0.00062377076,0.0006910509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989395,0.000105307074,0.000056767396,0.00021085991,0.00038862723,0.000298898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013488601,0.00015716093,0.00017112875,0.00011798759,0.00045037674,0.00010124548,0.000257083,0.00018057122,0.00036034358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114236704,0.00016472231,0.00008804096,0.00030868934,0.0005113146,0.00016828926,0.000035910405,0.00013865811,0.000081371974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022920624,0.000088484194,0.007185502,0.0000029329642,0.000026786855,0.000005967545,0.04114018,0.000004187449,0.000024702435,0.9512184,0.0002672957,0.000033222976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040509633,0.00001987976,0.14850561,0.0000030616893,0.00001990567,0.0000015085435,0.03193046,0.00016587679,0.00010187315,0.8083519,0.010311807,0.00018301305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025997939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004654219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4294994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009616937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078261906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911581129","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000818","title":"A Gender Gap in Party Congruence and Responsiveness?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Gender gap; Representation (politics); Democracy; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Political economy; Demographic economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.08400816165923213,"score_gpt":0.3670949356392507,"score_spread":0.2830867739800186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911581129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86878735,0.0002572834,0.00005321802,0.00072387164,0.00035322385,0.0002705097,0.000009194473,0.000026497877,0.12951884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442774,0.000077710705,0.00015912001,0.00076798303,0.00013362705,0.0000111332865,0.0000044865847,0.00001254741,0.0044056317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983637,0.00025148626,0.00019684188,0.0002838919,0.00032410145,0.000580006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999251,0.0001835572,0.000050214192,0.0002087195,0.00010630958,0.00020019832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004909983,0.000106675696,0.00014583197,0.00011989139,0.00016249625,0.000078893456,0.00012963745,0.00011158493,0.00022301289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014104607,0.00010664558,0.000036295933,0.00015427255,0.00021374768,0.00014185019,0.000059642523,0.00012850978,0.000103291604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063608945,0.000033547167,0.1943305,0.000033290344,0.000013283927,0.000009964814,0.03082632,0.000023456863,0.00034164404,0.77405953,0.00023098769,0.000091130736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089463417,0.000029425544,0.62962025,0.000017418613,0.000023658506,0.00000967475,0.051676925,0.00029477864,0.00036014302,0.27867407,0.037978638,0.00042037477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004227191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028161594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49538544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011444677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040958196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63902766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911708914","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x18000892","title":"The Gender Gap in Political Discussion Group Attendance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ethnic group; Voting; Political science; Attendance; Poverty; Democracy; Gender studies; Gender gap; Face (sociological concept); Survey data collection; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Law; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.0653853477192291,"score_gpt":0.36326986618698376,"score_spread":0.29788451846775466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911708914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35178596,0.00036696202,0.0004495013,0.016054008,0.0022671716,0.00079764484,0.000022710845,0.00010219982,0.62815386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98639417,0.000046508438,0.00011856956,0.0010358992,0.00055955467,0.000020256339,0.000009941256,0.000024305871,0.011790793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691856,0.0003475142,0.00033198338,0.0003480909,0.00065683,0.0013970492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.0002553221,0.000066193476,0.00040023832,0.000087934786,0.0003400932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069490704,0.00016003038,0.00016293551,0.00008596855,0.0005664151,0.00015991495,0.00036199452,0.0001473326,0.00021015425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013833823,0.00009831768,0.000106691106,0.00020862813,0.0003611444,0.00015219508,0.000109082444,0.00026860295,0.00031472387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029167852,0.000048123067,0.05969595,0.000014337147,0.000011411433,0.0000032394073,0.0067420243,0.000007366805,0.00006147709,0.9326328,0.0005934699,0.00018688838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006596278,0.000027274926,0.21989802,0.000016095391,0.000022042748,0.000005676131,0.06757243,0.00039582187,0.00008834939,0.60299665,0.1079101,0.00040789568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024360772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004916301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6346082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034439826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026878336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4356464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009948428","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x19000886","title":"Implementing Inclusion: Gender Quotas, Inequality, and Backlash in Kenya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Inclusion (mineral); Backlash; Oppression; Government (linguistics); Constitution; Inequality; Gender equality; Political science; Power (physics); Affirmative action; Gender inequality; Gender studies; Redress; Gender mainstreaming; Politics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.1272810967360012,"score_gpt":0.391375779632924,"score_spread":0.26409468289692284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009948428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84765667,0.0005559903,0.0007673632,0.0112109855,0.00027956077,0.00040522727,0.000042347358,0.000090104586,0.13899177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948563,0.00010000766,0.00052081275,0.0035698249,0.00064782344,0.000007405912,0.000018683797,0.00001869414,0.00026044808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976491,0.00026806543,0.00037128569,0.00034019363,0.0005028941,0.0008684912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918014,0.000110230685,0.0000821721,0.00014550232,0.00008856753,0.000393395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007639506,0.00014106608,0.00018172586,0.00008218843,0.00080033345,0.00010766816,0.00019861563,0.00010665839,0.00026723562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020276304,0.00014765865,0.00005197305,0.00024113509,0.00015559542,0.0001447618,0.00090871676,0.00018028931,0.000027778504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030236326,0.000049627128,0.19864728,0.00008269819,0.000028665696,0.000014754193,0.20426708,0.0000128766205,0.00021888314,0.5946787,0.0013195019,0.0006769199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020208256,0.00006153552,0.22380039,0.000020103918,0.000085006024,0.000007063684,0.17124642,0.001632367,0.0006111287,0.3578632,0.24164607,0.0010058937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034522598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004891479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24032657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010953045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024234186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6155599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047319872","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x2000032x","title":"Introduction: (Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation through Empirical Perspectives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Empowerment; Conversation; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Structuring; Feminism; Gender studies; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10190767586182954,"score_gpt":0.3887894582013223,"score_spread":0.2868817823394928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047319872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20087264,0.0064326404,0.0008264183,0.52032775,0.000931395,0.0005831591,0.00005074063,0.00025128378,0.26972395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875156,0.00009283729,0.00017175802,0.0075344914,0.0045892866,0.000011062587,0.0000031071231,0.000009500259,0.00007231831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811965,0.00031397448,0.00026734226,0.00043638804,0.0002550365,0.00060760195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.0002390884,0.00008402721,0.0001549798,0.00025926868,0.0002538343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003705902,0.00018487181,0.00025525966,0.000013379755,0.00073185825,0.00021675965,0.00018831465,0.00010738403,0.0000985287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082130585,0.00015227281,0.000091593865,0.00015984205,0.0012566493,0.00019725945,0.000118855765,0.0002635046,0.000019967036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034755572,0.000011603046,0.0035030907,0.000016314369,0.000050635677,0.000001382648,0.4148451,2.2667378e-7,7.8298814e-7,0.5794314,0.0021014733,0.000034528483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017323998,0.00003194631,0.00086386356,0.0000037702534,0.000055875375,0.0000053197787,0.7316088,0.00008910948,0.00001697775,0.16544363,0.10156459,0.00014289924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000549217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014338567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78664297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035510966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021623725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6209505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047526546","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000574","title":"Evidence of Exacerbated Gender Inequality in Child Care Obligations in Canada and Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Inequality; Psychological intervention; Child care; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Health care; Gender inequality; Demographic economics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economic growth; Psychology; Medicine; Economics; Psychiatry; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.23989231088463273,"score_gpt":0.38142719382560786,"score_spread":0.14153488294097513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047526546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945325,0.0019030421,0.0000061403116,0.0023993761,0.00006705896,0.00024717336,0.00003974653,0.000021860977,0.00078309746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983244,0.00056729757,0.000018942133,0.0009392478,0.000094439114,0.000015346099,0.0000032086766,0.0000074500094,0.0000296679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827135,0.00036875482,0.00031481462,0.00025050837,0.00036932086,0.0004252729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990607,0.00035211357,0.000090956,0.0001757766,0.00006671326,0.00025375467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038133966,0.00011349847,0.00018523897,0.00004551422,0.0001812097,0.000021523472,0.0002580488,0.00007883264,0.00007112924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008007203,0.00010388622,0.000023204148,0.00039391583,0.00021289918,0.00010499969,0.000081038816,0.00027663328,0.0000013723097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000393635,0.0000051893644,0.90572566,0.0001529403,0.0000071626264,0.000005150152,0.091266,0.0003312578,0.00004504437,0.0023887448,0.00006304136,0.0000058786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021232221,0.0000042172296,0.916763,0.000034486355,0.0000075617904,0.0000015704339,0.08171869,0.000009646385,0.000023033235,0.00087633345,0.00023671931,0.000112426875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91100174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058942635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012725897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017403208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4236357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049345155","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000598","title":"News Coverage of Child Care during COVID-19: Where Are Women and Gender?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Newspaper; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Child care; Pandemic; Health care; Political science; Conversation; Psychology; Medicine; Geography; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.05534261393746137,"score_gpt":0.3311575366734799,"score_spread":0.27581492273601854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049345155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8969775,0.001556974,0.00042327214,0.009378643,0.00018974156,0.00036067507,0.00016066988,0.00008894663,0.09086357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948307,0.00066902186,0.000058770693,0.0036271603,0.00046835735,0.000010611527,0.000009531202,0.000020365065,0.0003054602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983592,0.00013935192,0.00024275636,0.0003046592,0.0003881663,0.0005658675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986412,0.00005396589,0.00012583841,0.00017132296,0.00010301851,0.0009046367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009654634,0.00013941436,0.000209403,0.000057747973,0.00056532037,0.00007151228,0.0001640805,0.00011279997,0.00019372282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019801385,0.00014552535,0.00006461549,0.00013978482,0.00020619157,0.00009747706,0.00010252288,0.0001393585,0.000009802671],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013313331,0.000041277934,0.14451066,0.0010838377,0.000095187854,0.00002599712,0.73975074,0.00022970897,0.00009990376,0.11286394,0.0011249396,0.0001605233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018052125,0.000062130435,0.09802072,0.000016821514,0.000072494826,0.000011551302,0.74514806,0.000068286354,0.00040190987,0.04930343,0.10447007,0.0006193393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016566943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016695035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103345126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035871827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59343517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085774845","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000227","title":"Do Elites Discriminate against Female Political Aspirants? Evidence from a Field Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Audit; Identity (music); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Gender bias; Social psychology; Gender studies; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.19880936294169302,"score_gpt":0.40711831086701833,"score_spread":0.2083089479253253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085774845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84431684,0.0017534902,0.0037144872,0.029100385,0.0006882371,0.00044578963,0.00007806297,0.00017318565,0.11972955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98750114,0.000115720366,0.0009814563,0.009476358,0.0014743063,0.000023716957,0.000015654536,0.000024263936,0.00038740406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972458,0.00024279354,0.00034744883,0.000483861,0.00066804554,0.0010120888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982051,0.00042144745,0.000071545604,0.00030271418,0.00013318127,0.0008659969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019564255,0.00019868476,0.0002266798,0.000049444574,0.0004126547,0.00023799876,0.0003724375,0.00015108864,0.0005126717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006313803,0.0001908015,0.00014746653,0.0001419349,0.00024276922,0.00021892408,0.00014991236,0.00020558713,0.00018856385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134026795,0.000116830604,0.016467812,0.000047944715,0.00007202142,0.000035791112,0.157111,0.0000118348335,0.002687342,0.8204636,0.0020735012,0.00089893653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019615674,0.00045557081,0.04242781,0.00029606168,0.00041730358,0.000004158111,0.51887625,0.0019208129,0.115557596,0.23455472,0.08103225,0.0024959128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006829105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004032342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58590883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015897326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031700806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100890669","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000276","title":"Who Controls the Purse Strings? A Longitudinal Study of Gender and Donations in Canadian Politics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Turnout; Voting; Political science; Inequality; Demographic economics; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Gender gap; Exploit; Gender inequality; Economics; Geography; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.12633067115890276,"score_gpt":0.3674263896089986,"score_spread":0.24109571845009584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100890669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559575,0.00020135565,0.000074996344,0.004763765,0.000118791235,0.0006699393,0.000067729416,0.000016613567,0.038129356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984778,0.00002546711,0.000034564895,0.00092404603,0.00027211139,0.000018450388,0.0000044568233,0.000013303603,0.00022977896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981128,0.0002257986,0.00031157906,0.00023959669,0.00041311537,0.0006971244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988441,0.00016627408,0.00007796973,0.00017462745,0.00017927922,0.00055778376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035893638,0.00012138739,0.00019035695,0.00013920211,0.00044829233,0.00009552355,0.0002211141,0.00007874569,0.00004918545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002876128,0.00010508976,0.000042665444,0.00027248485,0.0002626919,0.0000918485,0.00005378828,0.00018056639,0.0000045062766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013597996,0.000070423775,0.2627228,0.000013108412,0.000046541125,0.0000078952135,0.10681234,0.000076167686,0.0000051160764,0.6300686,0.00014708046,0.00002854623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008409616,0.00006166714,0.79325,0.0000038685534,0.000079042904,0.00000229116,0.17723747,0.00070367526,0.000013070908,0.023434315,0.0042001517,0.00017347286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6009796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22016235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6066343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017627883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008532587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7940677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115730110","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x20000653","title":"The Politics of Part-Time Work: Gender, Employment Status, and Preferences for Redistribution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Argument (complex analysis); Welfare state; Demographic economics; Scholarship; Politics; Workforce; Redistribution of income and wealth; Welfare; Work (physics); Labour economics; Panel data; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.13341120918693056,"score_gpt":0.3606680565725164,"score_spread":0.22725684738558583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115730110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77305347,0.01303279,0.0012955576,0.066942185,0.0022119717,0.0036252544,0.0027015214,0.00044750044,0.13668977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577117,0.0011524953,0.000089664674,0.0005720638,0.0013058495,0.000032044078,0.000020006022,0.000010728992,0.001045981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984842,0.00010844648,0.0002601027,0.0001635474,0.0002969157,0.00068679295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903226,0.0003563757,0.00011177321,0.00009305628,0.00016471285,0.00024179337],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029511657,0.000113745424,0.00017731483,0.000014963136,0.001314691,0.000054515272,0.00014086449,0.000093654526,0.000008959311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005171234,0.000080213955,0.00007417128,0.00013327185,0.000737333,0.000057589907,0.00007684776,0.00008479621,0.00000420843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014026859,0.000028995624,0.004960321,0.00004237285,0.00012858566,1.6767775e-7,0.0511332,0.0000010713752,0.000010929322,0.93329585,0.009567111,0.00081734476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146722,0.00016105513,0.019963123,0.000017708284,0.00017586244,2.4278404e-7,0.06827373,0.000035763307,0.00047665994,0.65038794,0.2595303,0.00036295498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042476697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032428143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28290793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007779929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025881053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162325564","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x21000131","title":"Representations of Political Leadership Qualities in News Coverage of Australian and Canadian Government Leaders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Honesty; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Compassion; Ethical leadership; Law","score_opus":0.2227002407283119,"score_gpt":0.391350195886908,"score_spread":0.1686499551585961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162325564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75687766,0.00022544964,0.00006900423,0.020757634,0.00025539208,0.00023380862,0.00026856083,0.000011448904,0.22130103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99291104,0.00007119435,0.00021928214,0.0005820117,0.00009021148,0.000004901745,0.000016324786,0.0000098987375,0.006095124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801284,0.0002653245,0.0003662826,0.00020561651,0.00047015672,0.00067975203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902105,0.00019762151,0.0000693077,0.000193876,0.000118656484,0.0003994817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023839288,0.00009450133,0.00019239626,0.00009808018,0.00011250636,0.000031949483,0.00009639528,0.00011199197,0.00014937817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003396756,0.000109679306,0.00006172467,0.00017940451,0.0005740607,0.00009163657,0.00002796885,0.00011255345,0.0000022603206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013478792,0.000041444844,0.097129084,0.00007657268,0.000024923835,0.000009865674,0.039158534,0.000020470718,0.00011169413,0.86306655,0.0002886798,0.00007085183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038421672,0.000015377882,0.15188107,0.000024079785,0.000033647302,0.0000045451475,0.78604263,0.000015209795,0.0033480646,0.05429931,0.0037873907,0.00016444639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5125117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22962198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8087672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032749632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010675227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7844354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200163642","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x21000350","title":"Lobbying Beyond the Legislature: Challenges and Biases in Women's Organizations’ Participation in Rulemaking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Legislature; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Public relations; Process (computing); Political process; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09522584680998458,"score_gpt":0.37046089075104494,"score_spread":0.27523504394106035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200163642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612419,0.0036707672,0.00006349211,0.008339784,0.00023591676,0.00014005374,0.0000038732915,0.00002011117,0.026284102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782735,0.00080721045,0.00008738563,0.0006645899,0.00018944142,0.000019941377,0.0000082547185,0.000010201457,0.00038560524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866766,0.00027132352,0.00018412482,0.00018937222,0.0002190631,0.0004684832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993458,0.00027157032,0.00004292898,0.00013807426,0.00011742192,0.00008420644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045877654,0.0000736611,0.0000944072,0.00008343367,0.00028540826,0.000119623284,0.0000717652,0.00007413548,0.00004484716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008134916,0.00006577919,0.000012993259,0.00032662615,0.00014119271,0.000121010235,0.000052447722,0.00011829634,0.0000038564317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001001652,0.000076506105,0.01617041,0.000022019003,0.00001210553,0.000040224455,0.34378904,0.00021756472,0.00006470656,0.63813865,0.000040335308,0.0014274346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048952014,0.000008954937,0.47862133,0.000035390505,0.00001900821,0.000013837269,0.28125775,0.00057938596,0.00033489705,0.22975338,0.00863294,0.00025358424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066496513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002495463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46245092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016173904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033340364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26823974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280620206","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000149","title":"Gender Is Not a Proxy: Race and Intersectionality in Legislative Recruitment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"University of Toronto; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Intersectionality; Legislature; Proxy (statistics); Politics; Race (biology); Representation (politics); White (mutation); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20891976995841482,"score_gpt":0.4110593581514884,"score_spread":0.2021395881930736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280620206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7490862,0.00034781752,0.00054865994,0.011009357,0.0014269445,0.0015476461,0.00016875335,0.000076385135,0.23578826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907181,0.000034310116,0.00021048481,0.0020208228,0.00018253711,0.00017958604,0.000011237954,0.000012220922,0.0066306964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980744,0.00041155296,0.00022425568,0.0003162073,0.00051551824,0.00045804004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946433,0.00009567154,0.00007232003,0.00014943648,0.000072532865,0.00014570312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065575185,0.00010743167,0.00013330142,0.00012827932,0.00062623504,0.000056944806,0.00012280891,0.000050197454,0.00053276756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005750236,0.00011722054,0.00005227921,0.00019152468,0.00018325113,0.000101323334,0.00017113781,0.00023034512,0.000008661668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010177648,0.0001579998,0.04058508,0.000020190502,0.000056277924,0.000008917466,0.4284863,0.000047522717,0.00005466572,0.52795416,0.0023140244,0.00030466923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010718323,0.00006402164,0.107336484,0.0000053710382,0.000044618057,0.000016826176,0.2618204,0.0007322771,0.0003710109,0.29915556,0.32890636,0.00047523368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057423688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017253573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32659236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005507898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003713252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8680782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321442586","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000721","title":"How Jacob Zuma Revitalized Feminism in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"South African History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Political science; Presidential system; Government (linguistics); Media studies; Front (military); Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0925593193810981,"score_gpt":0.3115952573758906,"score_spread":0.2190359379947925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321442586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24727686,0.0010047867,0.00004011666,0.0026955954,0.0011368868,0.00044906564,0.00010341592,0.00055942277,0.74673384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375249,0.000012762203,0.00007630475,0.00031195552,0.00039765064,0.000026235753,0.000009306536,0.000015542742,0.0616253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839795,0.00017318715,0.0001427337,0.00024468094,0.00037066446,0.0006707631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.00007518114,0.000055265955,0.00020195077,0.00005427761,0.00021361499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038441815,0.00011899731,0.00017107313,0.000117679396,0.00036186058,0.0000865911,0.00024443032,0.00014651091,0.00016271777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033200494,0.000116513445,0.000089804715,0.00064644095,0.00021909388,0.000094129384,0.00004179908,0.00016424821,0.00034361676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028864395,0.000019908066,0.0022313786,0.000016622746,0.000011946483,0.00003233784,0.7330772,0.0000017218402,0.000039328657,0.2543997,0.01010295,0.00006403089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002673134,0.0000094609295,0.0014511968,0.000009558074,0.000016773383,4.571793e-7,0.3040245,0.000005961682,0.00001338198,0.016455505,0.6775369,0.00020901335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038921375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031298518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6902481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018263323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019408939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47512805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321498640","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000733","title":"#JusticePourMirabelle: The Resurgence of a Transnational Cameroonian Feminist Movement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Transnationalism; Feminism; Politics; Political science; Social movement; Independence (probability theory); Political action; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.08613980329431391,"score_gpt":0.2679322631442322,"score_spread":0.18179245984991826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321498640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06664251,0.00021113815,0.00042018882,0.014251348,0.0017401153,0.00038383578,0.0012062814,0.00021176264,0.91493285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96611077,0.0000071801264,0.000019711884,0.001651067,0.00032294806,0.000020174693,0.000032194355,0.000014678498,0.031821303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987958,0.000044179902,0.000319351,0.00014799228,0.00034221628,0.0003504737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931556,0.00021347425,0.00005576882,0.00020316441,0.000102503254,0.000109525565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017172565,0.000112257985,0.00013664977,0.00006350871,0.0003240445,0.000034647197,0.00020065592,0.000031144515,0.0007889621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003653843,0.000079624704,0.00009973692,0.00007988621,0.0004048163,0.000041000083,0.00003674154,0.000116980336,0.00008862015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031089073,0.000046853067,0.000102494036,0.000047869427,0.00003070332,0.0000043425202,0.015278634,0.000016896676,0.000016746963,0.9793323,0.0050061694,0.00011385228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021132483,0.000068007364,0.0010962175,0.000009044769,0.000059976814,0.0000014266742,0.010494786,0.0027504389,0.0000459814,0.17101593,0.81403387,0.00021297572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018961613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047847636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89946824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000517547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010832604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8638582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322770244","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x22000666","title":"High-Risk Feminism in Colombia: Women’s Mobilization in Violent Contexts. By Julia Margaret Zulver. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2022. 194 pp. $29.95 (paper). ISBN: 9781978827097.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"History and Politics in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Mobilization; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018021044329887288,"score_gpt":0.2701570030284356,"score_spread":0.2521359586985483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322770244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66075,0.00346162,0.00019827289,0.0026152753,0.004377517,0.0019092143,0.0009359142,0.00065940106,0.32509282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625142,0.005880821,0.00013186263,0.0010588665,0.0003574107,0.000016458347,0.00012964995,0.000045662382,0.029865064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633163,0.00075071055,0.00047285817,0.00056838593,0.0005893443,0.001287054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982919,0.00045592562,0.0002164221,0.00040326358,0.00010414035,0.0005283413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008617698,0.0002862752,0.00041919888,0.00016641233,0.00050711166,0.000063366,0.00051850907,0.0003614188,0.00084602064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038901297,0.000363369,0.00009415936,0.0008282976,0.00065529806,0.00028640658,0.00014119882,0.000539609,0.00015276659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054576067,0.00029694842,0.026041143,0.000063714026,0.00007458118,0.00008076129,0.091609746,0.00053269323,0.00011950022,0.22277564,0.6573812,0.00096950936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014088021,0.00010058374,0.008041563,0.00004201719,0.000041979132,8.085906e-7,0.01797127,0.00021417369,0.00015751025,0.008301162,0.96311766,0.00060245645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06754294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30573648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022971816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016397813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322774782","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000041","title":"“Don’t Put Color in Your Hair, Don’t Do This, Don’t Do That”: Canadian Mayors’ Mixed Gender Performance on Social Media","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Social media; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.13384462839543793,"score_gpt":0.34388042563871146,"score_spread":0.21003579724327354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322774782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85159683,0.0001593289,0.0000059189433,0.0037220595,0.0026076392,0.0005216239,0.00018957697,0.00016700434,0.14103004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179035,0.00032315,0.00007095,0.0010990785,0.0016069541,0.00007048022,0.00013099727,0.00006835957,0.0048397016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951003,0.0003713469,0.00047518738,0.0006546976,0.001191109,0.0022073165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981961,0.00025914947,0.00014209058,0.0003934693,0.00018071494,0.00082847435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010561588,0.000364373,0.00036927985,0.0007020371,0.0012960582,0.00029088857,0.00058821583,0.00047149003,0.0008249274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021208839,0.00037489596,0.00017437046,0.0007596725,0.00043210995,0.00024057247,0.00011766313,0.00051802595,0.0006100128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023881537,0.00020057832,0.105351076,0.00012387066,0.00016695594,0.00012833955,0.27553535,0.00024450885,0.0000633893,0.5439475,0.07205241,0.0021621392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013941785,0.000046667956,0.6747091,0.000031327258,0.00007977026,0.0000067008546,0.16924351,0.000651582,0.00024772808,0.040142585,0.112385504,0.0010613413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12455375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11167027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013088712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018557837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362473398","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000089","title":"Making Women Visible: How Gender Quotas Shape Global Attitudes toward Women in Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Demographic economics; Gender equality; Economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.1532895255049057,"score_gpt":0.4061254290266456,"score_spread":0.2528359035217399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362473398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91758716,0.00018061843,0.00011775144,0.002817074,0.000966776,0.00039765693,0.00014484287,0.0003259528,0.077462174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929965,0.00013395306,0.00021273585,0.0012667683,0.0010071587,0.00010309449,0.000030465457,0.000047637524,0.0042016543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942797,0.0003414404,0.00043534135,0.0006002191,0.0010560283,0.0032873016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983502,0.00016795189,0.00012652102,0.0004160584,0.00020336454,0.00073591585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122965,0.00031982036,0.0003860797,0.00034527137,0.00057278655,0.00042694758,0.0005415511,0.00028456113,0.00040459627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039538793,0.00034497632,0.00011967231,0.0011548066,0.00037397235,0.00028564557,0.00027751827,0.00027569823,0.00024616098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055671776,0.00014120169,0.17040315,0.0001736986,0.0001329054,0.00007870967,0.15286687,0.00012440294,0.000032397576,0.6725887,0.0028929648,0.0005594137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074499863,0.000043465596,0.44166818,0.000022917757,0.000025799402,0.000009118217,0.20285913,0.0007458114,0.000024640847,0.3240204,0.029152302,0.00068325555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022097523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016651403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34856832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029587634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001109449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375862529","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000193","title":"Submitting to<i>Politics &amp; Gender</i>: Advice from the Editors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Advice (programming); Gender diversity; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.09662746601316172,"score_gpt":0.3702450478609993,"score_spread":0.2736175818478376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375862529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6668405,0.0002726427,0.0015921968,0.037589338,0.017594619,0.0011409872,0.00050839735,0.001358788,0.27310252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95548755,0.000050194903,0.0007974312,0.004878574,0.027002962,0.000039580522,0.00012218808,0.00005843217,0.011563061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962766,0.00036220535,0.00041004713,0.00045992143,0.0010267794,0.0014644326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743074,0.0009921148,0.0001040115,0.00059776014,0.0002854276,0.0005899647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008716024,0.00022772638,0.00020337652,0.00013739736,0.001551947,0.00027506813,0.0006294425,0.00019096893,0.00021727713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009174939,0.00019466436,0.00015627246,0.00068181765,0.00027618467,0.00012832419,0.00023952643,0.00028937496,0.0016692212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002147665,0.000054173463,0.021822995,0.000023358212,0.000120030716,0.000010457143,0.17446269,0.00019509764,0.00016833839,0.3774387,0.42549926,0.00020276013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019498111,0.000007666631,0.04248097,0.0000089116,0.00007004641,0.0000012904072,0.05790007,0.00014178001,0.00013553641,0.113907084,0.78481245,0.0003392007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01845107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047847783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35931322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002186189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005069498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381167617","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000302","title":"Gender and LGBT Affinity: The Case of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lesbian; Gender studies; Transgender; Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10856351286548917,"score_gpt":0.3565512361569549,"score_spread":0.24798772329146573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381167617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8564733,0.00011914456,0.000044975248,0.00077643443,0.00033895552,0.00024442282,0.000028962437,0.000053805143,0.14192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98645496,0.00004383594,0.00012826019,0.00028465217,0.00027592064,0.000012187704,0.000009862122,0.000015766906,0.01277455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985416,0.0001604554,0.00023320141,0.00022184225,0.0002933587,0.0005495772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909544,0.00021872722,0.00007802242,0.00027934284,0.00013509495,0.00019336483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006261233,0.00011535874,0.00014183043,0.00009299889,0.0005717057,0.00007042757,0.00015761128,0.000107716776,0.0001685165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011625213,0.0000903724,0.000070692564,0.00022646452,0.000364461,0.00008147172,0.00011745839,0.00016013601,0.000037391048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022155152,0.00004112247,0.015771456,0.00003805615,0.000089896945,0.00013290005,0.2845107,0.000031152216,0.000040906096,0.69577205,0.0032867629,0.00028278836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008900321,0.000051534826,0.16847807,0.000013776914,0.0002973299,0.000278432,0.22878641,0.00041592313,0.0006056028,0.49660194,0.102989994,0.00059094763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14206918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029853944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19917008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001933725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007493609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383033633","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000363","title":"Antigone’s Example: Early Modern Women’s Political Writing in Times of Civil War from Christine de Pizan to Helen Maria Williams. By Mihoko Suzuki. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022. 452 pp. $119.99 (cloth), $89.00 (ebook). ISBN: 9783030844547.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Politics; Humanities; Art history; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03292317802618407,"score_gpt":0.24777439302891505,"score_spread":0.21485121500273097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383033633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479556,0.0012277698,0.0004547367,0.0009166261,0.00040922992,0.00057020807,0.0030700755,0.00030219436,0.04509357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281794,0.0002399668,0.0001197558,0.0015606948,0.00086333294,0.00008853838,0.00048578286,0.00012138751,0.0037026205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536306,0.00015613872,0.0011202507,0.0006418636,0.00072955294,0.0019891325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978901,0.00025594514,0.00022315654,0.00063228,0.0002557139,0.0007427879],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006447784,0.00053854915,0.0007680124,0.00037783905,0.00035473323,0.00024432663,0.00048834,0.00024205985,0.003989219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013203711,0.000521616,0.00017318454,0.0001761869,0.00027646197,0.000118130796,0.00027436958,0.0005085421,0.0005303144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024381369,0.00032931528,0.025146445,0.00086269464,0.0005590784,0.00014585804,0.29986972,0.00011517448,0.004063436,0.61490816,0.05227172,0.0014845585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007492669,0.00097352563,0.11866045,0.000736819,0.0002461604,0.000053037365,0.06101372,0.02966501,0.005693576,0.61298347,0.15789674,0.004584837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026925044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019137484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.238856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042210575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023799452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386778609","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000429","title":"Violence against Women in Politics: An Urgent Problem the Political Science Community Must Take Seriously","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Political science; Content analysis; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.08707627910245493,"score_gpt":0.37289068984305757,"score_spread":0.28581441074060265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386778609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441041,0.000028693361,0.000019111065,0.003825295,0.0004284269,0.00051414734,0.00005206485,0.00019419544,0.050833985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944604,0.000091980386,0.00009993127,0.0037251033,0.00046560372,0.00009757502,0.000027091439,0.000033178385,0.0009991233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302393,0.0010083134,0.00049874716,0.00043965076,0.0011647583,0.003864609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963066,0.00035414397,0.000097243734,0.0008318541,0.00033965072,0.00207052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043642754,0.00024218437,0.00024993223,0.0004104511,0.0027786754,0.00037094802,0.001291342,0.00015054575,0.00007533859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011701626,0.00020615921,0.00008162625,0.0013745894,0.002536141,0.0003705466,0.00038717827,0.00064827804,0.0001238575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001668625,0.00016428002,0.011252377,0.00003190779,0.0000118672915,0.000011583489,0.12920953,0.00013946401,0.00017605237,0.85859805,0.00013784817,0.00026536177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030204625,0.000052396757,0.07667937,0.000033962166,0.000012285674,0.0000051263323,0.47087693,0.00078999007,0.0002343413,0.4466855,0.003970949,0.00035711116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03370783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017850298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41191256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016722592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034365037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387876195","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x23000508","title":"Gender and LGBT Affinity: The Case of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne – CORRIGENDUM","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1164111786813375,"score_gpt":0.3450629871823485,"score_spread":0.22865180850101102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387876195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020228626,0.001996853,0.00007457624,0.0010495621,0.037371706,0.00123352,0.00060538633,0.0001713172,0.93726844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27083436,0.00047043158,0.00011379503,0.0004719585,0.00340451,0.00004434507,0.00022187151,0.00010797651,0.7243308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965141,0.0003843673,0.0006039923,0.00060771697,0.0007592809,0.0011305517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978099,0.00027312143,0.00037237338,0.0007289398,0.00039921954,0.00041643417],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009235016,0.00040788663,0.00051420956,0.00022666075,0.0010154613,0.00019376285,0.00047890982,0.00076818874,0.00039714362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026665762,0.00033284994,0.00024050093,0.00028367093,0.0008143244,0.00010152247,0.00031583486,0.0010543923,0.000063876345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003183593,0.00006899183,0.0010891866,0.00020795371,0.00033811384,0.0003789074,0.1688266,0.0000056400972,0.0000020016362,0.22482654,0.6041128,0.00014006834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003497719,0.000037386806,0.006859417,0.00004265247,0.0005911189,0.00021412663,0.058458716,0.00007105024,0.000016843098,0.09854323,0.83416635,0.00064934976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37208813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17267351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25060573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000790486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048293793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393150591","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000060","title":"Do Women Politicians Know More about Women’s Policy Preferences? Evidence from Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.061439899591045746,"score_gpt":0.36304991362573413,"score_spread":0.3016100140346884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393150591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93200624,0.0032722857,0.00012631367,0.009748167,0.001813545,0.00033011858,0.00066933053,0.00020341978,0.05183056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982638,0.00059549714,0.00006538447,0.0026152881,0.003115711,0.00012449008,0.000023289418,0.000044230525,0.01077809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560827,0.0002636829,0.00041733118,0.00061131193,0.0010991159,0.0020002646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977087,0.000510347,0.00007621845,0.0004634303,0.00024304226,0.0009982832],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004564572,0.00028316956,0.00028169592,0.0002242081,0.0005611001,0.0005827061,0.0005482143,0.00018357646,0.0010482913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005943755,0.00027298596,0.000086355794,0.00046961085,0.00037453155,0.00030771695,0.0001253939,0.00031589172,0.00008622761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004604106,0.00005223962,0.006821567,0.00014601345,0.00021635217,0.0000628193,0.38862377,0.00004868167,0.000076374294,0.5902617,0.010902691,0.0027831718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022739646,0.00004344656,0.046510834,0.00021643197,0.000066132736,0.0000056956856,0.24378283,0.0002173326,0.0002513709,0.39541623,0.31244197,0.0008203444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9496329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23125292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057330616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012230379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396930269","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000084","title":"Partisanship, Independence, and the Constitutive Representation of Women in the Canadian Senate","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06138904163061099,"score_gpt":0.3567185416860566,"score_spread":0.2953295000554456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396930269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6587496,0.00070968503,0.000043236752,0.009081298,0.00041804957,0.00051597477,0.00002764786,0.000018043895,0.33043647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865526,0.00008617253,0.000012130187,0.00047227409,0.00012136725,0.00003405498,0.0000029223775,0.00000450181,0.0006113285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983612,0.00045516563,0.00017396496,0.0001462945,0.0003597025,0.0005036881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925125,0.00036515787,0.000029941855,0.00013488789,0.00006942629,0.00014935319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017130018,0.00006321738,0.00010118167,0.00011512495,0.00034836103,0.00017354124,0.00014848984,0.00007185656,0.000037968566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027435028,0.000039457074,0.000033461638,0.00029992845,0.0010494454,0.0000948534,0.000019971292,0.00017145523,0.0000073737856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015853441,0.000004219689,0.0064378297,0.000011246926,0.00001671873,0.0000073837464,0.20782918,0.000009796458,0.0000034752436,0.78542876,0.00014189465,0.0001079389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033519158,0.000007541441,0.02964615,0.000017489994,0.000033290522,0.000010669344,0.22155838,0.0004592793,0.00013745287,0.7356628,0.012020892,0.00011086183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47874272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19636358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33990565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029986654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011831977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81830066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401135095","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000138","title":"All the President’s Women? Female Leaders, Family Ties, and Gendered Cabinet Appointments Worldwide","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Nexus (standard); Politics; Family ties; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.10505571011532537,"score_gpt":0.3564953706520467,"score_spread":0.2514396605367213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401135095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782611,0.00979754,0.00057993043,0.012339256,0.0025881522,0.0010250817,0.000113074304,0.00034846328,0.19059747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604754,0.0004418628,0.00010391401,0.0023344464,0.00071082835,0.000059749415,0.000018865021,0.000032167885,0.035822753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976359,0.0002361265,0.00026426496,0.0003802652,0.0005537134,0.00092974154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991008,0.00019093204,0.000042262487,0.00028229458,0.000063898326,0.00031982956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055842224,0.00018633502,0.00015406746,0.00011596703,0.0005084256,0.0004442445,0.00025354352,0.00010969005,0.00014564166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006386634,0.00014541548,0.00007156732,0.00017539039,0.0005302223,0.00016977754,0.00011111255,0.00021892841,0.000097625496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053731806,0.000067344925,0.004309019,0.00015457017,0.00037854927,0.00003623117,0.37487411,0.0000337676,0.00016272308,0.57718545,0.04184861,0.0009442197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039732113,0.000036246012,0.03273528,0.000023866789,0.00013642189,0.000013506625,0.33292714,0.0004521476,0.000114503026,0.19444676,0.43827528,0.0004415406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051543126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020614023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39642665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003501433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046001628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7791813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402991834","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x2400028x","title":"A Comparative Approach to Explaining Gender Disparities in Asian American and Asian Canadian Politics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Asian americans; Political science; Politics; Gender studies; Asian studies; Sociology; Ethnic group; China; Law","score_opus":0.10154057017396607,"score_gpt":0.37158609660993736,"score_spread":0.2700455264359713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402991834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18958212,0.00045818413,0.0011043614,0.005012783,0.0005023558,0.00051291066,0.000140612,0.00010656752,0.8025801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948063,0.00002875762,0.0016085475,0.0013012964,0.000499054,0.000050784387,0.000031459767,0.00003145234,0.0016423495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973247,0.00022874112,0.00029358477,0.00046812836,0.00039659097,0.0012882646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851876,0.00009786873,0.000033230688,0.00020103758,0.00008057513,0.0010685055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034393053,0.00021883413,0.00029374487,0.00057436747,0.0005134849,0.00043678808,0.00019596385,0.00010509029,0.00002583551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006770113,0.00023076676,0.000059937844,0.0005196316,0.00051184674,0.00016943253,0.00006144822,0.00027924703,0.000032673335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0069706e-7,0.000028922888,0.0069524017,0.000040564875,0.00003811352,0.000015221467,0.21126398,0.000034453144,0.0000031488248,0.7805794,0.00075388805,0.00028921547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024974704,0.00004722869,0.21814387,0.000041627314,0.00006536754,0.000024661185,0.6305349,0.0023590422,0.00003349333,0.08959681,0.058136135,0.0007671372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4860317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108989164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8052242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064083165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011303496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94103956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403614922","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000394","title":"When Councillors Sexually Harass: Legislative Sanctions and Gender-Based Violence in Canada’s Municipalities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Legislature; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1057683313545247,"score_gpt":0.34350092487692613,"score_spread":0.23773259352240145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403614922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7602796,0.0037538894,0.0013825285,0.004927778,0.0021038295,0.00057062664,0.0003431091,0.0001658155,0.22647282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556905,0.00016596909,0.0002281989,0.00079178426,0.00023639356,0.000027389686,0.00001724493,0.00001967379,0.0029442827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979519,0.0002067036,0.00026652988,0.00032602294,0.0006011753,0.0006476727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999105,0.00030674486,0.000037466707,0.00018548999,0.00013741844,0.00022791933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041675553,0.00015506273,0.00015618932,0.00014452872,0.0003404338,0.00016696841,0.00014979662,0.00008275056,0.0001270371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012311933,0.00015724846,0.000038638114,0.00016165785,0.00028691965,0.00017047954,0.000039567465,0.00020977217,0.000009110577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002941288,0.000034721666,0.035946626,0.00014353365,0.00007457157,0.00004636796,0.17177029,0.00050883106,0.000024759112,0.78749037,0.003475419,0.0004815547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006434837,0.000036679445,0.109817825,0.00015421316,0.00013475057,0.000009725494,0.31979907,0.012510827,0.00013010383,0.4237545,0.13206694,0.0009418815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36373585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014073139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008758093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99686134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406187568","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x24000461","title":"A Look Back At 20 Years of Research on Gender and Voting in <i>Politics &amp; Gender</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.18917164918307217,"score_gpt":0.44586320192584816,"score_spread":0.256691552742776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406187568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66405123,0.0005641966,0.00014316259,0.00061345025,0.00035842299,0.00042869366,0.000046089608,0.0000305459,0.3337642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98077154,0.0001385142,0.0004552611,0.00068781216,0.00025951586,0.000014163884,0.000017784874,0.000025618552,0.017629806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963926,0.00057154644,0.00048330464,0.00048194488,0.0008677192,0.001202856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982138,0.0007313411,0.00008276016,0.00038563012,0.0003016967,0.00028475988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411985,0.00017345336,0.00027446126,0.0005719947,0.0004416488,0.00008671395,0.00029169975,0.00024667435,0.00014569178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041214292,0.00019652929,0.00008740288,0.0005842781,0.00079397485,0.0000845774,0.00028485645,0.00039846887,0.000099942394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008801345,0.0001409616,0.0624324,0.00018548522,0.000060228333,0.000008514063,0.02656077,0.000081289836,0.00022864061,0.9052499,0.0049275984,0.00011540549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002663657,0.00008621856,0.28939384,0.0001809012,0.000120296136,0.000011255405,0.07946016,0.00046825476,0.0024253814,0.47687218,0.14736398,0.00095389085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035228613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000717655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42837772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005233173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065969914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80142313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407879379","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25000054","title":"The Effects of Parental Leave on Attitudes Toward the State","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04359965363085923,"score_gpt":0.3811548104762186,"score_spread":0.33755515684535936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407879379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690039,0.0030847075,0.000034835142,0.02842482,0.0036799214,0.00086929667,0.000030211282,0.000093163406,0.39477915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188817,0.000882733,0.0000029563973,0.0011280548,0.0002985145,0.000016691569,3.7216824e-7,0.000004044271,0.0057784817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990672,0.00014843847,0.00012030847,0.00008441487,0.0002357874,0.00034383824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880326,0.00094051455,0.000043954835,0.00012304714,0.0000540829,0.000035155143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024978703,0.000074204494,0.00009990561,0.00002083722,0.0011014063,0.000035579484,0.00022833252,0.000039465,0.0000019521933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040650382,0.000036945752,0.00008144535,0.00012632109,0.00083597295,0.000021171409,0.00007158781,0.00010604274,0.000009332191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005615732,0.00003881782,0.006347678,0.000049679347,0.00015780753,6.8160756e-7,0.07993187,0.0000019704353,0.000012317549,0.90814376,0.0035740605,0.0017357238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038701962,0.00007889029,0.21846865,0.00006324158,0.00008799893,1.6950928e-7,0.07498398,0.0000041275653,0.0025182334,0.67120624,0.032011297,0.00019013304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026914438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047452404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42288426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007395376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015095892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8471238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409821732","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25000194","title":"Is Scholar-Activism an Oxymoron? Reflecting on the Challenges and Opportunities for Scholarly Activism or Activist Scholarship in the Politics and Gender Field","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Oxymoron; Politics; Field (mathematics); Political science; Political activism; Gender studies; Social activism; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6736886224126424,"score_gpt":0.5373872769503126,"score_spread":0.13630134546232975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409821732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82112366,0.0007910722,0.000029211087,0.08137293,0.00014990292,0.0006835217,0.000020197633,0.000039394577,0.09579013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97817427,0.0015862912,0.00007676475,0.01738309,0.00041277034,0.00010374291,0.0000011527887,0.000017780963,0.002244151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965795,0.0011427257,0.00021721637,0.00042395675,0.00064883544,0.0009877653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574405,0.0033870481,0.00007415394,0.0003784998,0.00018463173,0.0002316275],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590909,0.00020925305,0.00021134404,0.000208813,0.0029098275,0.0013117454,0.00061453343,0.0002406325,0.00003027049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030238733,0.00013802965,0.000060230384,0.0002850534,0.00058402395,0.0012786079,0.000121653124,0.0009985033,0.000002051233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028769518,0.000078635545,0.0011932979,0.000046040168,0.000037806945,0.0000043114374,0.12568721,1.01219236e-7,0.000072496805,0.8579245,0.00039253017,0.014534261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053983193,0.00027741602,0.056864392,0.00006393377,0.000051749448,0.0000060365373,0.37019807,0.000036543275,0.0006973747,0.5013148,0.0695566,0.00039324118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018038364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088246167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35660973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019020661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008865372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412016112","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100093","title":"Are LGBTQ+ Candidates Disadvantaged in Financing Their Campaigns? Evidence from Canadian Federal Elections, 2015–21","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04826293965367555,"score_gpt":0.3581556625081397,"score_spread":0.3098927228544641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412016112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970629,0.0013991515,0.0004098744,0.006408425,0.0011345227,0.0003531316,0.00013473594,0.00005435126,0.019476822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930776,0.00014563906,0.000117977535,0.0012729082,0.0002801383,0.000026093407,0.000022223161,0.000012553313,0.005044911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980709,0.0002542941,0.00026990418,0.00033063907,0.00022321082,0.0008510528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895674,0.00030052237,0.00008681107,0.0002449404,0.00012126193,0.0002897439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266776,0.00015435016,0.00018962899,0.0002610514,0.00091857865,0.00020176609,0.00023890671,0.0001407907,0.00012555598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005122447,0.00015402176,0.00006618172,0.00036272043,0.00013926085,0.00020193536,0.000041956824,0.00023761808,0.000031130032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036122165,0.000033578042,0.940089,0.000020749367,0.000037100537,0.000016776085,0.026348934,0.00010933138,0.000108414904,0.026562482,0.006495838,0.00017419178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030729413,0.0000075265716,0.8273794,0.00014846976,0.000031702166,0.0000013072876,0.07965457,0.0004622062,0.000770269,0.07423994,0.016634682,0.0003626535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8323943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87696844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112709604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010224505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017586115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7065057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412549329","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100196","title":"Feminist Government but No Feminist Foreign Policy: The Curious Case of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Foreign policy; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027637399971091055,"score_gpt":0.3268419158759638,"score_spread":0.29920451590487274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412549329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040741954,0.000113693175,0.00009027461,0.0039030567,0.00050759676,0.00027750558,0.0002795087,0.000016756907,0.9540697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691538,0.000017734115,0.000056448163,0.0040846197,0.00042763457,0.000016415626,0.0000036836518,0.000010863163,0.026228769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980975,0.00014085967,0.00033303094,0.0001997066,0.00060607295,0.0006228247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891955,0.00029130335,0.00012358364,0.0003512824,0.00012650416,0.00018775757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000360978,0.00013070474,0.00016038919,0.00003600248,0.0008705819,0.00006919447,0.0002874218,0.000078533114,0.000056814737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038539173,0.00010596444,0.00007885033,0.00020070582,0.00039937426,0.000020002084,0.000104343555,0.00012322376,0.0000040891314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024262465,0.00003531571,0.0025859447,0.00003292636,0.000058841357,0.000055528424,0.007430085,0.000012956662,0.00001426089,0.97178185,0.017914858,0.00007501368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005679621,0.00003598052,0.0033471682,0.000022971932,0.00014909898,0.000108794964,0.25421965,0.00032086833,0.0015430377,0.18911754,0.5501768,0.00039013402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81815886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22628789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084329175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042918767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78783035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414705229","doi":"10.1017/s1743923x25100421","title":"The WPS Agenda Beyond 2025: Time for a WPS Treaty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics & Gender","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security council; Quarter (Canadian coin); Treaty; Work (physics); Track (disk drive); National security","score_opus":0.08691660210267951,"score_gpt":0.26247605848332867,"score_spread":0.17555945638064915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414705229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057512272,0.008283824,0.0050156424,0.007443295,0.0020702283,0.00076648546,0.0017930601,0.00010209046,0.9170131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999517,0.00071296643,0.0014758037,0.0075354357,0.00055243354,0.00014616392,0.00010349813,0.000058427748,0.08946357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843484,0.000009173438,0.0005309671,0.00037077966,0.000020716532,0.0006335488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990974,0.00017537527,0.00013284628,0.00046910593,0.000032927706,0.00009231737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031151136,0.00018209976,0.00031163613,0.00010791745,0.00036259115,0.0001570976,0.0003383337,0.00012290651,0.00018394498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009561463,0.00017973312,0.00022479423,0.00012604418,0.000085476364,0.00009121973,0.0000748243,0.000110052264,0.0011814791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009202905,0.000039681057,0.0025979234,0.000022814495,0.00014545867,7.016157e-7,0.00014673697,0.000035937737,0.0000037056168,0.9435663,0.05292408,0.0005074426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041291575,0.000017320097,0.002791073,0.0000022845022,0.000016685743,0.0000012976741,0.00007524258,0.0017875904,0.00006806636,0.42061645,0.57406193,0.00014911863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011807624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015962152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021311094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006969446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}