{"meta":{"query_hash":"bc2d525ecbd4","filters":{"venue":"Politics Groups and Identities"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bc2d525ecbd4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Politics+Groups+and+Identities"},"results":[{"id":"W1152395919","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2015.1065751","title":"Political stories: media narratives of political participation by Asian immigrants in the US and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Mainstream; Vietnamese; Newspaper; Politics; Gender studies; Narrative; Political science; Asian americans; Media studies; Sociology; Ethnic group; Law","score_opus":0.031365355058223424,"score_gpt":0.3181299645586195,"score_spread":0.2867646095003961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1152395919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98228294,0.00071311014,0.000038063943,0.0019251376,0.00002759617,0.000016630333,0.0014474294,0.000007855306,0.013541147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557316,0.0009841159,0.00004677705,0.00021193222,0.000017485341,0.0000110263845,0.00046321983,0.000009803862,0.0026825015],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922395,0.00017468286,0.000038815873,0.00006036579,0.00024852098,0.00025363325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99393976,0.0018713243,0.0011355786,0.00013954267,0.0017784786,0.0011352786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172345,0.0002568215,0.000215485,0.0032061036,0.0071499012,0.0050115422,0.00069870095,0.00054300856,0.0031468375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061127986,0.00016821623,0.00015586281,0.0058119167,0.0026960622,0.001650369,0.0026804693,0.00091157004,0.00019441177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012585454,0.000045645567,0.22486351,0.00015828054,0.000039945116,0.0011447286,0.74049395,0.00008435851,0.0005118537,0.0014500316,0.011149744,0.019932032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004014745,0.000015845058,0.18453579,0.00015380782,0.000024790654,0.00013988944,0.7826528,0.000157083,0.00024121864,0.000120109034,0.03192335,0.000031385516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041256607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018350445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022543514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13314241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004041327","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2014.970560","title":"Cultural politics pathology: the Charter of Québec values","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Pathological; Law; Pathology; Medicine; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011081301395276402,"score_gpt":0.23708168895855286,"score_spread":0.22600038756327645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004041327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25653073,0.0065542054,0.002679993,0.1965999,0.0012357677,0.00004807197,0.00025057886,0.000085478234,0.5360153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96106106,0.00080011535,0.00025551853,0.00638931,0.00006663464,0.000014224698,0.000026699814,0.000025537638,0.031360842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969427,0.00083811703,0.000031079373,0.00023909478,0.00082512916,0.0011238217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972385,0.0007416463,0.00026409305,0.00013557823,0.0007913372,0.000828751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019519951,0.00024799732,0.0002494334,0.0011467624,0.024484836,0.010413801,0.0009424207,0.0020298045,0.0064510726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003998155,0.00021752535,0.0002146852,0.0019082923,0.020983122,0.0021803852,0.0025926335,0.0040991213,0.00023887787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035769095,0.000017877446,0.0068896133,0.000041515515,0.0000111832815,0.00050396885,0.07299922,0.0003217497,0.0004323608,0.8451852,0.050392415,0.02316914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003508626,0.000031879506,0.04116105,0.0003142303,0.000032150998,0.00026204356,0.13466,0.0009177586,0.00067650626,0.055428952,0.7663677,0.00011264755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98790795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99350125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10614564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10614564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09457038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77014416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052403146","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2013.785958","title":"Implicit attitudes: meaning, measurement, and synergy with political science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Field (mathematics); Social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; History; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027729769086778384,"score_gpt":0.3090194958538692,"score_spread":0.2812897267670908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052403146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61351955,0.0148900375,0.1544369,0.02007943,0.0006582011,0.00021381394,0.00061910256,0.00016927994,0.19541366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98301387,0.0014093951,0.01396421,0.00045747025,0.00022018954,0.00009649294,0.00008586828,0.00003122282,0.00072132365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880797,0.0075583253,0.0006153563,0.00087467185,0.0026468278,0.00022520553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9274392,0.05089346,0.008500808,0.006384343,0.0056650247,0.0011170984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013023929,0.00046343156,0.00065528374,0.004585278,0.0012351573,0.0074176225,0.0008413659,0.001689754,0.0032867892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094891876,0.00037239122,0.00036851622,0.004108419,0.01263313,0.009610396,0.003698466,0.0026413123,0.0003624717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029283843,0.0003651863,0.104136154,0.000696364,0.00022376174,0.00015631497,0.02599621,0.0012286727,0.001884903,0.6473077,0.0016374469,0.21607442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037160353,0.00011956358,0.05545665,0.00048545573,0.00007567016,0.00025102135,0.005095906,0.0038851,0.00079559366,0.92684937,0.006883093,0.00006538723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009774733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010707321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013023929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013883184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00128937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068877935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072151418","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2013.818043","title":"Immigrant integration, gender, and citizenship in the Dutch Republic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Radboud Universiteit","keywords":"Immigration; Citizenship; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Political science; Legitimacy; Population; Treaty; The Republic; Geography; Politics; Economy; Sociology; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.02623614040492997,"score_gpt":0.2766509966678797,"score_spread":0.2504148562629497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072151418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9502071,0.0011445031,0.00012479768,0.0019059099,0.000032956486,0.0000064773485,0.000028959119,0.0000018452082,0.04654744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701095,0.0003511138,0.000027541308,0.00008464692,0.0000061845763,0.000004836091,0.000010918408,0.0000021464978,0.0025016298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987882,0.0005897299,0.000039508763,0.00007002377,0.0001405405,0.00037209873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.00014760393,0.00016705233,0.00001902433,0.00004774718,0.00016932124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015313858,0.0000971898,0.00023365347,0.0006592118,0.0028780114,0.004073193,0.00031901436,0.0004238908,0.002526089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018280734,0.00008718899,0.00015495061,0.0013243532,0.0030887537,0.0017364622,0.0021133972,0.00048855983,0.00017023903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015520983,0.00024851473,0.2225734,0.00007385045,0.00003580242,0.0015770795,0.55675286,0.00022814749,0.00064143236,0.1732516,0.002931016,0.04153116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018340621,0.000061210485,0.17856811,0.00014347686,0.000019131543,0.0004517519,0.7641111,0.00024559916,0.00020485188,0.009326687,0.046823267,0.000026577178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05215193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0979667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05215193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002722127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021606793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103696704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190553347","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2015.1080620","title":"“Displaced futures”: indigeneity, land struggle, and mothering in Honduras","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Futures contract; State (computer science); Sociology; Political ecology; Gender studies; Biosphere; Politics; Narrative; Work (physics); Geography; Political science; Ecology; Anthropology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0193665248616575,"score_gpt":0.21141745401501902,"score_spread":0.19205092915336153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190553347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992638,0.00032295348,0.00009926037,0.00079872966,0.000009569214,0.0000037016382,0.000007439779,0.0000014112251,0.006118906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875927,0.00017000842,0.000052074814,0.000057560155,0.0000027993851,0.000002727586,0.000003858652,0.0000016151045,0.0009500407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993943,0.00028049934,0.000015461455,0.000054059485,0.00004264028,0.00021300632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992663,0.00036434372,0.00018076262,0.00003888566,0.000041865413,0.000107968764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010993624,0.00023411663,0.00021305874,0.00052261795,0.008983959,0.0027094355,0.0006114242,0.0005850069,0.0015877723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014687212,0.00023913059,0.00007529443,0.0007768428,0.00843366,0.0020992255,0.004322346,0.0010573313,0.000072104565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013722195,0.000012529891,0.012692798,0.000024895982,0.0000022960692,0.0010513054,0.9751338,0.000029160945,0.00044362777,0.004155635,0.00023025907,0.006209994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014213176,0.000015395635,0.013384414,0.00002971163,0.0000021248195,0.00015930258,0.97527325,0.00004257549,0.0001023478,0.0005957334,0.010388275,0.0000054127013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06063956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17138761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06063956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041493597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020059606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12057322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253640197","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2015.1053399","title":"Intersections of exclusion: the institutional dynamics of combined gender and ethnic quota systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Ethnic group; Scholarship; Representation (politics); Politics; Transformative learning; Parliament; Affirmative action; Sociology; Collective action; Political science; Political economy; Inclusion (mineral); Intersection (aeronautics); Inequality; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.0845852556211018,"score_gpt":0.33169028568939324,"score_spread":0.24710503006829143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253640197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53728336,0.0008835351,0.13960676,0.013000359,0.00016325078,0.00016895722,0.00010877045,0.00015422392,0.30863085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99335045,0.000056295128,0.003557833,0.00014799606,0.000025031752,0.00007127673,0.000015385478,0.000026941136,0.0027487795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661112,0.024617653,0.0008913908,0.002373161,0.0032716373,0.0027350443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718635,0.017894184,0.0032617797,0.0036849186,0.0020323289,0.0012632858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022061981,0.000255982,0.0007424357,0.0021738675,0.008771361,0.0131698,0.0018141909,0.0014256116,0.008608269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040562723,0.0005989653,0.0007231626,0.0022122557,0.034789097,0.012680372,0.016357666,0.002718396,0.00062466104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063174375,0.000026965172,0.003912225,0.000040551386,0.000015097886,0.00012878592,0.04021458,0.00043826204,0.0004913208,0.9416871,0.00041870977,0.01256327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051305025,0.00012761487,0.0070889285,0.00021534447,0.000054563207,0.000207679,0.066378444,0.0035739264,0.0015134803,0.8408358,0.079889536,0.00006339574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034511152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036333103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022061981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053125704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044035064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11667633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275427225","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2015.1050411","title":"Social media and senior citizen advocacy: an inclusive tool to resist ageism?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Social media; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Social engagement; Political science; Population; Sociology; Focus group; Social science","score_opus":0.025665547810085267,"score_gpt":0.31167732090206285,"score_spread":0.28601177309197756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275427225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17793812,0.15367456,0.011014947,0.40630418,0.005856188,0.00043540436,0.00009247998,0.00022128144,0.24446282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957294,0.051945046,0.008101931,0.029095069,0.0022284486,0.0005920271,0.00004818549,0.00006894832,0.012190861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825526,0.0090379575,0.000455117,0.0003856096,0.0012468487,0.00061922416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699393,0.023732219,0.002223305,0.001005026,0.0013280686,0.0017721457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018170603,0.0006220108,0.0007242906,0.0043087206,0.0048544863,0.0132082645,0.0012065622,0.0044042217,0.0047825975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028639372,0.00040435774,0.0006802288,0.002083297,0.012099992,0.018831583,0.00944333,0.0033195082,0.00063920545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018537219,0.0003519652,0.008016534,0.005946889,0.00019903811,0.0008531183,0.27538323,0.00009871631,0.00096743327,0.13428196,0.01759113,0.5561246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010139951,0.00042911537,0.0074134446,0.014738682,0.00021687998,0.0010111663,0.20022231,0.00019967843,0.0010343066,0.07787462,0.69668686,0.00007155027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015859432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003923597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018170603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021968589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069720536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096096516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615558362","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1318759","title":"Beyond disenfranchisement: collateral consequences and equal citizenship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Conviction; Citizenship; Scope (computer science); Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Law and economics; Criminal Conviction; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02988507916612165,"score_gpt":0.31910104267981426,"score_spread":0.2892159635136926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615558362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66365,0.001116895,0.018359797,0.016432155,0.00017301488,0.00007954371,0.00007280639,0.000030289035,0.30008557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773335,0.00012061869,0.0002299833,0.0002751697,0.00002547134,0.000013539755,0.000008351726,0.000004784444,0.0015886457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961098,0.001769895,0.00013883461,0.00048703176,0.0006325912,0.00086195045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935666,0.0021525242,0.0013257284,0.0015455864,0.0006775544,0.0007319852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033951858,0.00025423782,0.00051326404,0.0009425028,0.006669481,0.006555449,0.00096223725,0.001975651,0.007508267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01355544,0.00017688255,0.00034994967,0.00094182236,0.02824413,0.010087754,0.010125583,0.004442612,0.0002764026],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046418252,0.00006705412,0.011383981,0.00003094795,0.000016662701,0.0006378801,0.01893507,0.0003576665,0.00021040851,0.9533187,0.000991621,0.014003584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021821319,0.00013283611,0.022570243,0.00030654206,0.00004156056,0.0010902043,0.041901074,0.0012821989,0.00073104614,0.89553386,0.036339078,0.000049691367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004867378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007804014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007508267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002568866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028110927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025117695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618457246","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1330216","title":"Language politics, education, and ethnic integration: the pluralist dilemma in Singapore","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Ethnic group; Multitude; Graduation (instrument); Politics; Leverage (statistics); Political science; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Social integration; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03220440968367217,"score_gpt":0.35314378177946787,"score_spread":0.3209393720957957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618457246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931658,0.00015495927,0.00004082031,0.001984593,0.000007972486,0.0000014601609,0.000016683856,0.000001033928,0.004626708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995085,0.00005982355,0.000014872213,0.00007677819,0.000004192285,0.0000013271649,0.000009417828,8.476093e-7,0.00032416172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985316,0.0007351409,0.00007985866,0.00014317044,0.00019597262,0.00031432608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976004,0.0004062282,0.0008537277,0.00011532768,0.00017331137,0.00085102813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020952108,0.00013568293,0.00034985595,0.00097066246,0.0036464164,0.0038590555,0.0003191838,0.00043460753,0.0040006526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026433556,0.00014719984,0.00016771749,0.0017723772,0.0028443078,0.0026925285,0.00487819,0.00096130354,0.00031890368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058499478,0.00015766027,0.8465418,0.000039811846,0.00004987185,0.00076709676,0.1120236,0.00011184308,0.00037599594,0.014268304,0.0011538704,0.024451546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060562134,0.00005628189,0.795366,0.00007958727,0.000021062639,0.00018390855,0.19227032,0.0003035956,0.00017558335,0.0036739311,0.007847547,0.000016128077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012473753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046433985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012473753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014460029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016489736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024802327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620075859","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1321997","title":"What do women symbolize? Symbolic representation and cabinet appointments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Representation (politics); The Symbolic; Symbol (formal); Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Art; Programming language; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.033915935250986864,"score_gpt":0.34138688148598884,"score_spread":0.307470946235002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620075859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6927585,0.0028008795,0.0039906553,0.022343067,0.00041316738,0.000020835796,0.00010021184,0.00003613118,0.27753657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946713,0.00033812798,0.00013752365,0.00025925494,0.000056200148,0.0000056525746,0.000012373966,0.000009994458,0.0045096013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628395,0.0024625687,0.00006330857,0.00024919864,0.00035530806,0.00058560295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962568,0.0020119199,0.00081882847,0.00021314752,0.00020802143,0.0004911441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024591826,0.00026964338,0.0002524073,0.0012423168,0.0045786384,0.0067671034,0.00045779024,0.0010730604,0.0073265815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010313308,0.00017985556,0.00016115517,0.0013115498,0.012121602,0.0038710528,0.0029822872,0.0012496321,0.00085047213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016957296,0.00008286249,0.026343433,0.00011699936,0.000016303915,0.00054903014,0.6623945,0.00013214846,0.0009873823,0.24507815,0.0065932823,0.057536367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035054523,0.00015327157,0.032318104,0.000475738,0.000023846591,0.00080026675,0.6920328,0.00053692504,0.0010156019,0.06289134,0.2096596,0.00005739867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003923496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043043983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073265815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019531595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097310054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024509847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626880984","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1338970","title":"Voting for one’s own: racial group identification and candidate preferences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Social psychology; Voting; Preference; Identity (music); Politics; Value (mathematics); Social identity theory; Race (biology); Test (biology); Collective identity; Voting behavior; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social group; Gender studies; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05284538505252384,"score_gpt":0.3570663475348008,"score_spread":0.304220962482277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626880984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99436814,0.000032543227,0.0001881254,0.00016072615,0.000004802489,0.0000045100796,0.00001327984,0.000001116899,0.0052266675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999345,0.000014244269,0.00007792516,0.000036586895,0.0000047128938,0.0000034337395,0.000016500271,0.0000014547661,0.0005000147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999132,0.00057633413,0.000023072125,0.00008179959,0.000085421394,0.00010144826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413043,0.003313883,0.0013084974,0.0004006603,0.00023131772,0.00061518414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019275298,0.00011931085,0.00023954407,0.0004550094,0.0009964046,0.0016163136,0.00017481117,0.0005621237,0.008797797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009404084,0.00009683143,0.00018234106,0.00035480366,0.0006977714,0.0008814991,0.0008162226,0.00066892355,0.0006951738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002927534,0.0025029234,0.90873164,0.0000795856,0.00015408648,0.00020057186,0.008668923,0.0007845519,0.0073165223,0.01738542,0.0014534123,0.049794856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011460344,0.00079076004,0.9583198,0.000040916657,0.000111787245,0.00029648215,0.013569975,0.004694819,0.001804516,0.01646187,0.003755241,0.000039355542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013987682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024610313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008797797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002960669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023654276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029431581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735922467","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1354038","title":"The differentiation of citizenship; from negotiated differences to corrupted liability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporate governance; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.06234797481748912,"score_gpt":0.3290225495348609,"score_spread":0.26667457471737177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735922467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22094452,0.0021277994,0.22384605,0.032341063,0.00040916837,0.00024343992,0.000080612685,0.00015214771,0.51985514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496336,0.00018646772,0.008258663,0.00088453386,0.0000572486,0.00010594306,0.000016054411,0.000035912657,0.0054916563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98072,0.011285149,0.00085873343,0.0023704185,0.003579377,0.0011864188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98885196,0.0046089543,0.0012044269,0.0038369491,0.00073709193,0.00076065515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010689632,0.00038221703,0.0007734247,0.0013736149,0.0042453166,0.009258206,0.001715298,0.0038181143,0.0028122573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020032099,0.00037173097,0.00068981235,0.001072108,0.091549635,0.012017497,0.012493294,0.006035733,0.00039817815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035908483,0.0000034696984,0.00011818831,0.0000066866605,0.0000016235712,0.000026431553,0.0028599896,0.00008336469,0.000058465568,0.995481,0.00011488967,0.0012422873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000747886,0.000012120104,0.00022613157,0.00003765773,0.000003043632,0.000083205494,0.0018990474,0.00043513798,0.0001565803,0.9890082,0.008121718,0.000009657461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014153746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010502707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010689632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040032924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05653286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904704646","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2018.1557056","title":"Where women stand: parliamentary candidate selection in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nomination; Politics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Parity (physics); Political science; Sex selection; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.01203894233190322,"score_gpt":0.26471154203996516,"score_spread":0.25267259970806194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904704646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115486,0.0017632842,0.00045883557,0.014762368,0.00021308704,0.00010452838,0.0015233706,0.000044544788,0.06958137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202044,0.0005064555,0.00021431687,0.00065593165,0.000017912304,0.000018766617,0.00025076428,0.000016276164,0.016299123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951762,0.00047244743,0.000093171984,0.00031983413,0.0010313932,0.00290703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478215,0.0005747961,0.00047958505,0.0000915085,0.001519408,0.0025525028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022839752,0.0001825881,0.0004561265,0.0019301379,0.016654346,0.004398446,0.0015115904,0.00089759124,0.010022366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006024504,0.00030187893,0.000283575,0.00416092,0.0025705416,0.00071359635,0.0030005393,0.0013727093,0.00069788547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006702539,0.00016297278,0.5413909,0.00044777125,0.00007190178,0.0028961487,0.15142453,0.0006825509,0.0022443074,0.045141634,0.08497467,0.16989237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003293699,0.00006160087,0.6753131,0.00024957515,0.000036682843,0.00028238233,0.18291083,0.00082970026,0.0007849723,0.00134873,0.13804825,0.00010120165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99859375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0823449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0823449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13834175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5974568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915709908","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2019.1584755","title":"Still not there: continued challenges to women’s political representation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04454271484049,"score_gpt":0.32575328785464874,"score_spread":0.28121057301415875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915709908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030373488,0.0054975846,0.001160181,0.8988536,0.0044761524,0.000015240884,0.00011122692,0.00003399172,0.059478477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76477486,0.008786643,0.002031112,0.13976294,0.0104444465,0.0001953716,0.0002658828,0.0002563308,0.07348248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96875674,0.0191265,0.0009114596,0.0020172345,0.004588749,0.0045993184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802223,0.0100655705,0.001052315,0.0010990978,0.0030503937,0.004510301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035539012,0.00033317713,0.00082531694,0.001920215,0.019356636,0.024535934,0.002627832,0.0075693894,0.016907604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044830315,0.0003932611,0.0005049613,0.0034622846,0.017465651,0.016994381,0.011081295,0.009070518,0.0024889319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009484199,0.000080205384,0.0052326573,0.00020458849,0.000018049353,0.00027714975,0.13171567,0.00009361779,0.00032216258,0.42684156,0.26716188,0.1679577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018706725,0.00004535197,0.0039070984,0.00040300694,0.0000071126747,0.00021283902,0.18466285,0.00018785235,0.00028152444,0.0664097,0.74382454,0.00003932949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014943639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035539012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006634931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009847884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18795055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920719036","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2019.1584750","title":"Running for elected office: Indigenous candidates, ambition and self-government","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Elite; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.012144901999894677,"score_gpt":0.28125595290470223,"score_spread":0.2691110509048076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920719036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98219115,0.000090069385,0.00007698263,0.00065424305,0.00001423404,0.00001006367,0.000012590281,0.0000015633935,0.016949032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814975,0.00004511748,0.00003322303,0.000042591364,0.000006233094,0.000003327409,0.000009487689,0.0000014425041,0.0017088577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804425,0.00066339946,0.000051921837,0.00012003629,0.0002828138,0.000837592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971361,0.00063272903,0.00065959734,0.000081542195,0.00035076766,0.0011392011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018170375,0.00011635368,0.00018909184,0.001162973,0.009128932,0.0036626663,0.0005732734,0.0005443318,0.00423488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004417688,0.00010496512,0.000119427634,0.0010350262,0.0048718746,0.0010313807,0.0024756736,0.0010151293,0.0002880789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012585656,0.0002079237,0.41415828,0.00008928082,0.000021502892,0.0010455307,0.53245157,0.00013144147,0.000824664,0.024762698,0.0018595845,0.024321668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049508203,0.000048589045,0.2939596,0.000086490654,0.0000072156527,0.00016936618,0.6891838,0.00015874134,0.00014351305,0.0011936774,0.015024597,0.000019436202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14622721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32897794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14622721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030181631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044204635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29075217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939589257","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2019.1605298","title":"Avoiding the spotlight: public scrutiny, moral regulation, and LGBTQ candidate deterrence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Candidacy; Legislature; Human sexuality; Prejudice (legal term); Lesbian; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03277549676528155,"score_gpt":0.2992131591410195,"score_spread":0.26643766237573796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939589257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95160526,0.0002933239,0.000421892,0.008650691,0.000032670338,0.000017742712,0.00001001415,0.000004939751,0.038963508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848014,0.0000639085,0.000049433103,0.00043618734,0.0000052892065,0.0000027715353,0.0000027336505,0.0000018136,0.0009578001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955922,0.0020694674,0.00007739833,0.00020083241,0.0009509782,0.0011091246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416107,0.0018346439,0.0019483018,0.00023298824,0.0007153564,0.0011075905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039383913,0.00012513295,0.00015550033,0.00077438384,0.010066267,0.0056713335,0.00054580445,0.0015540636,0.0030240056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009672153,0.00016312776,0.00017088532,0.00060290523,0.012315957,0.001191675,0.0021789942,0.002570225,0.0001876408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018387282,0.0005789588,0.3486528,0.00012151942,0.000047074467,0.00088618114,0.5310042,0.00020380467,0.0026074722,0.058555733,0.0050710947,0.0520873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021442707,0.000117200056,0.29697245,0.00023653849,0.000038159902,0.00036424954,0.6489957,0.0004813081,0.0013023495,0.0077102333,0.043702614,0.000057793808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20816322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25085843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20816322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009534974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011879136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41390312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949557710","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2019.1629315","title":"Sensing policy: engaging affected communities at the intersections of environmental justice and decolonial futures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Community engagement; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public engagement; Environmental justice; Economic Justice; Citizen journalism; Indigenous; Intersectionality; Futures contract; Deliberation; Situated; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.015480279231436415,"score_gpt":0.28426262802101926,"score_spread":0.26878234878958285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949557710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3505308,0.002333076,0.1548328,0.14577827,0.00073788775,0.00087051827,0.00012296451,0.00024252528,0.34455118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97575104,0.00070719095,0.013840768,0.0023257518,0.000042126878,0.00038414725,0.000025363064,0.0000606073,0.0068630097],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9611964,0.032991186,0.0003409383,0.0015557909,0.0015576875,0.002358084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773686,0.018018704,0.0012327736,0.0016207331,0.0007422444,0.0010169174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03359079,0.000887352,0.0007112368,0.0023813716,0.027113413,0.015138247,0.0028920483,0.0054962295,0.005884387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021685801,0.00059966586,0.00067606545,0.0018262194,0.07251811,0.018049106,0.020756392,0.005441695,0.0004602754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035376626,0.00007900178,0.0012447153,0.00017281597,0.00001457236,0.000417861,0.6473694,0.0006570138,0.000688714,0.3270757,0.0019052617,0.020339603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015418856,0.00006440646,0.00090837665,0.0004893441,0.000018620041,0.00016104034,0.6391367,0.00073147117,0.001486241,0.25386435,0.10308442,0.000039573435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015616269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026116557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03359079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012974843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018618299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17764723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955840801","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2019.1636833","title":"Race, class, or both? Responses to candidate characteristics in Canada, the UK, and the US","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions","keywords":"Ideology; Race (biology); Disadvantaged; Identity (music); Gender studies; White (mutation); Representation (politics); Ethnic group; Politics; Racism; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.01765414950917188,"score_gpt":0.2868682270682113,"score_spread":0.2692140775590394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955840801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961146,0.000043668715,0.000017313918,0.00026041124,0.0000079597285,0.000014918727,0.00012935739,0.0000012306542,0.003410521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691737,0.00006764883,0.000035825648,0.00014044673,0.0000041970657,0.000015171836,0.00014226785,0.000001994126,0.0026751626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982646,0.00047541398,0.00004558243,0.00012660217,0.0003642135,0.00072358805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963008,0.00077590486,0.0007918624,0.000105354025,0.00094369915,0.0010823805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016158565,0.00019426871,0.00032593324,0.000870474,0.004228446,0.0019683018,0.00039820833,0.00068492716,0.0050793043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00592284,0.00015569557,0.00026863418,0.0013619764,0.0013957043,0.00038173125,0.0010984909,0.0006845623,0.00044330783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011992366,0.00024646946,0.9276189,0.000055539647,0.00005145732,0.00017989767,0.044368464,0.00015356224,0.0011855913,0.0013873061,0.004771051,0.018782597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023201615,0.000098282355,0.91505605,0.000042287407,0.000019482737,0.000030404757,0.07920664,0.0002363414,0.00030419478,0.00010717653,0.0048386194,0.000037413367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9321472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9649344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067852795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009302742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008827912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13650471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037170927","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2020.1782948","title":"Diverse and inclusive high courts: a global and intersectional perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Intersectionality; Perspective (graphical); Privilege (computing); Gender studies; Diversity (politics); Race (biology); Disadvantage; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Geography; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017982904699169387,"score_gpt":0.28876736899116867,"score_spread":0.27078446429199926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037170927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2445417,0.0068702693,0.011719685,0.026055714,0.0001640043,0.000039609746,0.000054722834,0.000025757303,0.7105286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929819,0.0011334753,0.0009167737,0.00086936157,0.00007215585,0.000015691112,0.000015481191,0.00001676053,0.003978281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964417,0.0066572307,0.00014620803,0.00067974854,0.0012718241,0.0016009673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956126,0.0022571646,0.00038372565,0.00047717645,0.00047680593,0.0007925684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061040125,0.0004697366,0.0007028198,0.0049511255,0.016192226,0.025591502,0.0013037856,0.0025112687,0.005145588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004145582,0.0003024585,0.00036151096,0.0038410472,0.06789874,0.0138952425,0.017168943,0.004903942,0.00025723025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007066196,0.000015317913,0.002083288,0.000036502042,0.000008926157,0.0001639757,0.08389795,0.00011594044,0.0001634165,0.90446556,0.00064178015,0.008400252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007918454,0.00004270612,0.006890825,0.00046646732,0.000036164904,0.00040967937,0.34811312,0.0003068709,0.00051386846,0.52679336,0.11639275,0.00002629796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00889978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015562011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025591502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00713101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051739335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118348231","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2020.1854792","title":"Do ministers’ occupational and social class backgrounds influence social spending?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Legislature; Presidential system; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.05081114307648741,"score_gpt":0.35347257700444723,"score_spread":0.3026614339279598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118348231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895783,0.00021047775,0.00012950005,0.0009777535,0.000016488972,0.00000489067,0.00023856896,0.000002213188,0.008841763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.00012822561,0.000040556188,0.000053209482,0.000012571055,0.000003892178,0.00015743723,0.0000027162246,0.00081234763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989755,0.00035599782,0.000035833942,0.000106332154,0.00017806164,0.00034834843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955817,0.00092645205,0.0017300473,0.00017712632,0.00020709094,0.0013776462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338149,0.0001148673,0.00025106012,0.0008487004,0.0012038632,0.001813192,0.00027048663,0.00028104708,0.0070622903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066562453,0.000130041,0.00018395006,0.0014057424,0.0008866637,0.00081892713,0.0010063795,0.00064606965,0.0007415232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108314336,0.000076401855,0.9787991,0.000019959756,0.000040775878,0.00005582349,0.007260932,0.000057301204,0.00014849356,0.0018861454,0.0010383832,0.010508504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045731754,0.000020242906,0.9892085,0.000025667252,0.0000091977545,0.00002185349,0.007248932,0.00007395373,0.000033613836,0.00034802337,0.0030010722,0.000004298187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0395975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10191287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0395975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010102518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008134453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07873404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164927374","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2021.1926297","title":"Exploring the effects of electorate size on indigenous voter turnout","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Voting; Political economy; Demographic economics; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04983646830905659,"score_gpt":0.29999740249300455,"score_spread":0.25016093418394797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164927374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972556,0.000040581876,0.0000511293,0.00008081128,0.0000032028793,0.000006725933,0.00015897116,0.0000019903634,0.0024010385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911326,0.000019487621,0.00002901604,0.000008314671,0.0000023089578,0.0000035080445,0.0000815373,0.0000013611424,0.0007412828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.00021354697,0.000022598342,0.00008830564,0.000109941335,0.00034551497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995861,0.0014280885,0.00085406087,0.0002001479,0.0006233082,0.0010335329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010609693,0.00013678608,0.0002712278,0.0007025409,0.0017108618,0.0010145903,0.00045432136,0.00021548726,0.0053651202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046099178,0.000095619755,0.00028253626,0.00086382875,0.0009616219,0.00038732268,0.0009428873,0.00046873806,0.00040590312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120505574,0.00005190641,0.99192154,0.000015059325,0.00004504566,0.00007273681,0.0029622086,0.0001593127,0.00031602784,0.00043922546,0.0002604999,0.0036359266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016855261,0.00002782157,0.9958919,0.000005345935,0.000008911375,0.00001229309,0.0033245485,0.00013558057,0.00006440977,0.00005121163,0.00047374176,0.0000025430475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58682114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83561695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58682114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002441616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025114217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8312243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182832976","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2021.1950015","title":"Sources of evidence and openness in field-intensive research on violent conflict","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Openness to experience; Field (mathematics); Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.2882165392958645,"score_gpt":0.4585812315968533,"score_spread":0.17036469230098883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182832976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66569996,0.032583665,0.13297902,0.061394706,0.0016077153,0.0017353444,0.00041279037,0.00013564523,0.103451155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98296607,0.0019083088,0.011648788,0.0016553423,0.00026017218,0.00086433836,0.00007822044,0.00005093766,0.0005678317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6137153,0.32274422,0.017302372,0.014917105,0.027581587,0.0037393766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08758826,0.84855616,0.020751968,0.029680528,0.01241449,0.0010086086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.37230983,0.0010717466,0.0018667111,0.020189682,0.012949585,0.022317108,0.0048283194,0.0070730816,0.004064351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6383302,0.0023692066,0.0011062457,0.00995153,0.070089445,0.031579897,0.023512162,0.00745071,0.00038436224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045375898,0.000318312,0.046153996,0.0025922623,0.0005398654,0.0010675894,0.68347365,0.00090731983,0.00090549455,0.19127956,0.0022504136,0.07005784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036850595,0.0007999983,0.04078689,0.018193958,0.00036050254,0.0017038584,0.49194714,0.0021611606,0.0046645645,0.37082377,0.06786511,0.00032448696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030574952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030444101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99517167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007037593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006390727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77405375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280534851","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2022.2071304","title":"Gender, morality and violence in anthropomorphic metaphors depicted in Canadian political humor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Citizenship; Gender studies; Sociology; Ideology; Femininity; Masculinity; Morality; Conversation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03586149491121463,"score_gpt":0.32331619278342705,"score_spread":0.2874546978722124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280534851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65853107,0.003861919,0.00888943,0.013255663,0.0004305869,0.00007077806,0.00018552227,0.00010898296,0.31466597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324447,0.00034983744,0.0007917018,0.00032004886,0.000012935255,0.000012422996,0.000017403316,0.000025231162,0.005225987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951751,0.0021896274,0.00005496706,0.0003331345,0.0012149627,0.0010322422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661475,0.0018222925,0.00033966798,0.00016820797,0.00067278254,0.00038232334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004127503,0.0009473762,0.000539302,0.006442023,0.03256,0.0102295,0.0015402685,0.0020498373,0.004379724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007570589,0.0003406087,0.00036476477,0.0043626493,0.057632554,0.0036799735,0.0059993886,0.0027992986,0.00021194133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033875833,0.000007372442,0.0017616587,0.00007133269,0.0000047558547,0.0004433574,0.8319675,0.000116311945,0.0007605446,0.15595558,0.0021123851,0.006765408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006492712,0.000015452215,0.005318591,0.00023597153,0.000015995049,0.0004874636,0.8176508,0.00032881912,0.00060024526,0.012695842,0.16258165,0.00006264746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8680056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9082101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13199443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056857392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03458862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4125312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381510988","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2224762","title":"Youth’s low presence in parliament: the perspective of candidates and elected representatives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung","keywords":"House of Commons; Parliament; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; House of Representatives; Perspective (graphical); Population; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.027154710745875308,"score_gpt":0.32434306291055937,"score_spread":0.29718835216468403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381510988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603881,0.0006538393,0.00014788046,0.010346321,0.000080309255,0.000017719705,0.00023700135,0.0000059597924,0.028122822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562883,0.00031537347,0.000041544048,0.0008025456,0.000022869688,0.000005523955,0.00007740487,0.0000057124953,0.003100104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946062,0.0015027667,0.00008848807,0.00025757207,0.0008262123,0.002718837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587613,0.0006121331,0.00061093,0.00007854569,0.0010943395,0.0017279624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003454878,0.00022551737,0.000405298,0.0021427576,0.015637364,0.0074307495,0.0009576095,0.0010038571,0.0043270458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052396664,0.0002354672,0.00035118088,0.0022710739,0.0066923373,0.0020761478,0.0029590041,0.0025844271,0.00039222007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008335841,0.000069247995,0.21746004,0.00006562655,0.000020932182,0.00074235495,0.744934,0.00004642272,0.00048057045,0.010995245,0.008617547,0.016484698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003093428,0.000024752653,0.1002023,0.00007647431,0.0000091764305,0.00014159357,0.8786432,0.000058412912,0.00013392634,0.00034021254,0.02034775,0.000019066138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84117085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91224986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84117085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019539252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016660117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.319529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382813821","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2227437","title":"Do equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) requirements change student political attitudes?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Politics; Affirmative action; Inclusion (mineral); Quarter (Canadian coin); Diversity (politics); Higher education; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Medical education; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.18824136065603408,"score_gpt":0.48036285203766,"score_spread":0.2921214913816259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382813821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985341,0.000016272008,0.00006809403,0.0002860729,0.000007366642,0.000009715477,0.000017117425,0.000002073237,0.0010591903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994079,0.000014652598,0.000074721014,0.00007098536,0.000009780936,0.000014355001,0.00001523725,9.412044e-7,0.00039148008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971687,0.0013337921,0.00013094927,0.00024387462,0.00063403085,0.00048854644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861844,0.0051708645,0.004440314,0.00088832586,0.0007590699,0.0025569967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049542743,0.0001228025,0.0002935007,0.00034081904,0.00075294904,0.0012456641,0.00048614232,0.0007863767,0.0048628277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014772452,0.0001212244,0.0003803897,0.0005470422,0.0010284964,0.0008574606,0.0012357144,0.00081069325,0.00047335704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001304119,0.008110729,0.8939012,0.00007769495,0.000094467905,0.00012348722,0.004926023,0.0004559819,0.005320932,0.0013019742,0.00077375927,0.08360959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025514086,0.0017222873,0.99144125,0.000009298209,0.000016363185,0.000020921289,0.0032497623,0.00026496357,0.0018297766,0.00038590908,0.0010247685,0.000009171364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025290945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054978975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049542743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008603418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011863653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02620107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386261379","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2248075","title":"Institutional opportunities and party position change: the case of LGBTQ+ rights in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Position (finance); Institutional change; Human rights; Gay rights; Political economy; Gender studies; Law and economics; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.08940126306644489,"score_gpt":0.3110751633529767,"score_spread":0.2216739002865318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386261379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91525793,0.00089066237,0.00032182373,0.009152845,0.000066399414,0.00003794273,0.00021561515,0.000008652806,0.07404798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950877,0.0002383899,0.00011099118,0.00051450956,0.000007989269,0.000006113044,0.000047911577,0.000006747069,0.0039796727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374807,0.00084438483,0.00008879383,0.0003052703,0.0010015467,0.004011882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951096,0.0009759772,0.0005439923,0.0002626131,0.001059528,0.0020481928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028617124,0.00019169963,0.00040813143,0.0018715558,0.028279794,0.0069965897,0.0016089336,0.0014692463,0.007397921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00584621,0.00021540446,0.00044427958,0.003849795,0.009677653,0.0018596002,0.0054322947,0.003167376,0.00027263194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028434818,0.00018239366,0.2551667,0.00016560595,0.000074348645,0.0047143595,0.45587075,0.0011485124,0.0014937569,0.1854658,0.015989482,0.07944396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003347463,0.00003223832,0.21612515,0.00030615568,0.00005021889,0.00055476953,0.6626746,0.0008838432,0.0005915259,0.0066247643,0.11201909,0.00010425878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98854136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09624952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09624952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07695616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69834244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386326599","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2251651","title":"Racial discrimination at the polls? The Canadian case of Jagmeet Singh","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Immigration; Political science; Democracy; Racism; Context (archaeology); Redistribution (election); Prejudice (legal term); Racial formation theory; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Psychology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.04279160929337924,"score_gpt":0.33058730606903475,"score_spread":0.28779569677565553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386326599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77181596,0.0018242486,0.00031341377,0.08892312,0.000418479,0.00011405045,0.00037507495,0.000025050307,0.1361907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970456,0.0007110031,0.0002636242,0.010729538,0.000057412013,0.000024988387,0.00008001013,0.000018352363,0.017659051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929697,0.0009742087,0.000072248746,0.00043015144,0.0014858955,0.0040677846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938573,0.0009766732,0.00044577345,0.00026820533,0.0021205815,0.0023312974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005354657,0.00027780572,0.00053337985,0.0014325542,0.047890175,0.004774556,0.0018422375,0.0026419507,0.0062928298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011352961,0.00030896426,0.00038399105,0.0029409651,0.006296814,0.0011593297,0.0025047436,0.0039155376,0.0005394287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046188594,0.0002644051,0.31242117,0.00017429788,0.00010238132,0.007155395,0.24548241,0.00067547255,0.002208052,0.1078768,0.2287488,0.09442887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006588718,0.000083785766,0.25480747,0.00028483992,0.000099867575,0.0009777877,0.3814382,0.0008204684,0.0011563698,0.0037075435,0.3563393,0.00021841237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05560772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05560772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07831089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40346414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389569548","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2023.2286389","title":"Material circumstances and pandemic-related education choices: parental schooling decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic in four Canadian provinces","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Economic growth; Geography; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Medicine; Demography; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.0702380542356825,"score_gpt":0.354573326345645,"score_spread":0.28433527210996246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389569548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972927,0.00014183566,0.00002807054,0.00022871181,0.0000049769656,0.000011455456,0.0003641047,0.0000012493065,0.0019268495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910814,0.00013653906,0.000039576295,0.000029710844,0.0000012324423,0.0000045917777,0.00025552124,0.0000011356856,0.00042348122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990132,0.00010234161,0.00003721983,0.00009279822,0.0001804764,0.0005740089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976955,0.00030110928,0.00054801593,0.00007523426,0.00062300084,0.0007570977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010137527,0.00024116128,0.0002761758,0.0010377073,0.0055769337,0.0018725244,0.0010203876,0.0004225107,0.0021427884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030589418,0.00028447428,0.00043868535,0.0025162664,0.0019271648,0.0005447977,0.0015910418,0.0010578814,0.00012212602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014994093,0.00006319033,0.9609151,0.000026915814,0.0000343808,0.00019087853,0.028920686,0.000286121,0.00016993222,0.000659252,0.0010097141,0.007573864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044627664,0.000018897237,0.9400195,0.00005054887,0.000010555558,0.000027708034,0.058003064,0.00018134352,0.0000622669,0.00006066426,0.0015385082,0.000022397837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99486226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99790907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03112119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03112119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026643664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22580111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392922879","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2024.2328552","title":"Gender, family status, and parliamentary careers in the German Bundestag","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"German; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Demographic economics; History; Economics","score_opus":0.040433110061585786,"score_gpt":0.32898632762703095,"score_spread":0.28855321756544516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392922879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911157,0.0005848694,0.00013659443,0.00059947884,0.000023984217,0.0000037077314,0.0007597889,0.0000045526526,0.006771327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972097,0.00018593567,0.000058633377,0.00004881322,0.000009001904,0.0000049189566,0.00048518396,0.0000041651606,0.0019935349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897003,0.0002537427,0.000049384256,0.00013076475,0.00020979573,0.0003861856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981754,0.0004947967,0.000734335,0.00007367737,0.00012845408,0.00039338184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012867844,0.000113394075,0.00024475149,0.001602442,0.0012280658,0.0017041424,0.00020037481,0.00026025044,0.0063349344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003146537,0.00015433085,0.0001158484,0.0023371198,0.000717096,0.0008523786,0.0012460502,0.0004462069,0.00095931214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003533449,0.00015715933,0.86464816,0.00013141727,0.00009347219,0.00081258436,0.04079917,0.00049178774,0.00079669047,0.015409269,0.012519819,0.06378717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059404165,0.00003591831,0.9552639,0.00006950069,0.000015165463,0.00013332334,0.020943012,0.00019586182,0.00014426981,0.000851052,0.022328762,0.000013284923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03493749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06982512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03493749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009804943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006955353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06946826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402139938","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2024.2392240","title":"When pandemic threat does not stoke xenophobia: evidence from a panel survey around COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Xenophobia; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Panel survey; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Survey research; Criminology; Psychology; History; Sociology; Immigration; Law; Medicine; Socioeconomics; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.2847939607183537,"score_gpt":0.34476800777786626,"score_spread":0.059974047059512536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402139938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99793386,0.00009566742,0.00003917405,0.00016186187,0.0000096453105,0.000010386189,0.0002284905,5.5747574e-7,0.0015203769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910295,0.00014526007,0.000031909345,0.00010812152,0.000007856393,0.000012504712,0.00030763177,9.578898e-7,0.00028288734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914384,0.00044847748,0.00003957582,0.00013224805,0.00008803161,0.00014787524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514043,0.0014391402,0.0019362065,0.00035688357,0.00059902156,0.00052842835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014785448,0.0001606109,0.00018128115,0.0004668258,0.00088573864,0.0011482632,0.00037037072,0.00057908025,0.0024320579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057872357,0.00019924753,0.00016917363,0.00050231133,0.00066718255,0.0005779725,0.00082204666,0.0009445093,0.00033224458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031864434,0.00025201,0.9828487,0.00006108899,0.0000919303,0.000108094064,0.009104108,0.000037044607,0.00041644395,0.00012785186,0.0010364559,0.0055975663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065896133,0.000048704864,0.9879848,0.000026565896,0.000016412148,0.00003219794,0.010992541,0.00006375119,0.000083524734,0.00002941968,0.00070856104,0.0000070357514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055342417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092589036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055342417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059838063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040426967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110040545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404489183","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2024.2423081","title":"Using civically engaged research to promote young Black and Latino children’s well-being: lessons from a new interdisciplinary community-university, faculty–student collaboration","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Community college; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Media studies; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.10501511575019085,"score_gpt":0.424918428312366,"score_spread":0.31990331256217514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404489183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73395526,0.004943163,0.0134930145,0.15409258,0.0014567828,0.00084673107,0.00012220185,0.00026543374,0.090824835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445937,0.0034386464,0.02363461,0.012616334,0.00021784313,0.001069549,0.00007848555,0.00017195642,0.0141787585],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97040707,0.02399731,0.00029615912,0.0011972844,0.0012103515,0.0028917943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768748,0.009009661,0.000987839,0.0019689433,0.0014115433,0.0097471345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035278164,0.00075865776,0.00052420545,0.0014216359,0.025654059,0.013665356,0.003239669,0.0029663031,0.0037647842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01356185,0.0005546229,0.00094643974,0.00091206253,0.017669367,0.008358205,0.03202853,0.0060820463,0.000667799],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007069869,0.0009685495,0.011740048,0.00039336746,0.00004879031,0.0022055828,0.826867,0.00021963545,0.0014345672,0.027674576,0.013046297,0.11533081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003878466,0.00026355614,0.0047818087,0.0007497161,0.000029816942,0.00048750592,0.84697586,0.00014439812,0.00090507534,0.011706649,0.13386737,0.000049529986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014727907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07124695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035278164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00836056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04311493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18657094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406228748","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2024.2444897","title":"The political power of Muslim social capital in Europe and North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Embeddedness; Mainstream; Politics; Civic engagement; Political economy; Political capital; Social engagement; Sociology; Group cohesiveness; Power (physics); Political science; Social mobility; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.01017147766169705,"score_gpt":0.2662774400942778,"score_spread":0.2561059624325807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406228748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951368,0.00016915839,0.000028796205,0.0002106897,0.0000038851604,0.0000016348035,0.000024911795,6.2049077e-7,0.0044235066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970573,0.00008095677,0.000012695921,0.000021179807,0.0000034967334,7.1200657e-7,0.000013881461,3.1539648e-7,0.00016100451],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996075,0.00015001248,0.000011547064,0.000038379116,0.000056283276,0.00013629877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900913,0.00026579585,0.00031299205,0.000047552017,0.000115259696,0.00024928738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072743284,0.000078019984,0.000121973564,0.0011010042,0.0009037787,0.0011575619,0.00013799383,0.00017295638,0.0016238202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016482744,0.000054026335,0.000080055856,0.001063559,0.0009516009,0.00065778685,0.0013070138,0.0002116473,0.00007946382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017814594,0.00008366686,0.93722564,0.00002932751,0.000057540583,0.00016850216,0.017687723,0.00016169112,0.00050292164,0.0050764284,0.0008168543,0.038011644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034943243,0.000019458983,0.9853998,0.000024403891,0.000008662775,0.000043969,0.011788162,0.00009586144,0.00005888867,0.000410137,0.0021440196,0.0000031334305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02531004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06303558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97468996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007449687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005232233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050325453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406587712","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2025.2453167","title":"Black lives matter and say her name: how intersectional solidarity strengthens movements for social justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Social movement; Sociology; Economic Justice; Social justice; Intersectionality; Movement (music); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Politics; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034442629839710116,"score_gpt":0.37633161253525105,"score_spread":0.3418889826955409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406587712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7589592,0.0009260397,0.0030064469,0.060337715,0.00033461367,0.00005138141,0.000055345343,0.00005027658,0.17627914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411714,0.00014256182,0.00039143072,0.001376805,0.000047298818,0.000023728557,0.000009261236,0.000025956297,0.003865842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956605,0.002531108,0.00005948376,0.00039507772,0.00039834232,0.000955564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406576,0.0028055331,0.0010813257,0.0005489654,0.000363395,0.0011349224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061929575,0.00030657084,0.00033065642,0.0017179799,0.014327775,0.008981638,0.0010862981,0.0023024564,0.011416849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01321713,0.0002473713,0.00031776467,0.0011727829,0.02592715,0.009127668,0.010005268,0.00292848,0.0005947401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009198406,0.00008974578,0.019527145,0.00010541279,0.000027265065,0.0003267712,0.7313803,0.000083086255,0.0010751283,0.20237516,0.006276745,0.038641274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015917241,0.000079839745,0.022956915,0.00041695623,0.00002322339,0.00012044605,0.8158537,0.00022450005,0.00075394596,0.049999103,0.109514624,0.000040744213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013728795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02194761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014327775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004397968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004777423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038193166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409036307","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2025.2484260","title":"Ethnic affinities and political engagement: an experimental study of Chinese-Canadian candidates and voters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; McMaster University; University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Ethnic group; Politics; Political science; Affinities; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04055553925774368,"score_gpt":0.3589953436413309,"score_spread":0.3184398043835872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409036307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980318,0.000011713286,0.000039099807,0.00003597505,0.000008072619,0.00014049918,0.000024788395,0.0000010332103,0.0017069945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927987,0.000057608282,0.000384086,0.00015168254,0.000012233235,0.00036523293,0.00009374346,0.000003336117,0.0061334698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979942,0.0004788996,0.000049766415,0.00027017627,0.0005670493,0.0006400274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765754,0.00069532596,0.0003308515,0.00019197035,0.00048419423,0.0006401405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027313044,0.0006382494,0.0006264449,0.00061758986,0.011505362,0.0017937559,0.0007331102,0.0008619887,0.006142739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004394149,0.0003996872,0.00042298564,0.0008980369,0.0026957428,0.00046287375,0.0012431833,0.0014053334,0.00050498964],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025427306,0.1017149,0.356494,0.00046401515,0.00027788532,0.0015689498,0.3566134,0.0011543748,0.0583418,0.013182585,0.0064336206,0.078327134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030573534,0.027753819,0.6895997,0.00010825876,0.00025836282,0.00020030413,0.24249136,0.0025835927,0.0079611,0.00273427,0.022871764,0.00038009015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6671909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8236253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3328091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088170245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013239052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66953814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409972523","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2025.2498151","title":"Who gets the prestigious positions? Credentials and ministerial appointments in Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Public relations; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.027974170859550104,"score_gpt":0.3170750579906917,"score_spread":0.28910088713114157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409972523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958813,0.0002998617,0.00008366971,0.00050013675,0.00001003209,0.0000047163717,0.00014207324,0.0000014365777,0.0030766926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990326,0.00017924659,0.000038735674,0.000029954314,0.000009358153,0.0000023843509,0.00005852037,0.0000013299214,0.00064773706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991341,0.00029756717,0.000037727907,0.00008301917,0.00010484793,0.00034279734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687564,0.0006832,0.0013866001,0.000075255564,0.00012799742,0.00085131224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010290012,0.00010002508,0.00018733226,0.0009698606,0.00097103155,0.0013181135,0.0002454247,0.00024238417,0.0057542827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008151625,0.00014081459,0.00010147344,0.0016946557,0.0005728113,0.00092791836,0.0013526188,0.0005750015,0.00058504735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016559652,0.000076584314,0.95436436,0.00006388871,0.000017418328,0.00033792906,0.011800874,0.0001888881,0.00041039352,0.001939075,0.0017216187,0.02891322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008326105,0.000042802036,0.9761169,0.000087141285,0.0000056456215,0.00020176731,0.01626991,0.00019066781,0.0001228847,0.00053631386,0.006409817,0.000007931275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013606923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029457957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013606923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005867343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005836135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027055442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413185634","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2025.2543300","title":"Escaping the multicultural trap: strategic litigation and the decriminalization of same-sex relations in Mauritius","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Universitätsallianz Ruhr; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster","keywords":"Decriminalization; Multiculturalism; Trap (plumbing); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.025875383760911298,"score_gpt":0.30685768619611775,"score_spread":0.28098230243520644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413185634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9264296,0.0019073754,0.0004700594,0.014517793,0.000055629756,0.000022837288,0.000004417173,0.0000052070745,0.056587122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763954,0.000273031,0.00006160326,0.00060140307,0.000013081863,0.000005875038,9.719699e-7,0.0000016504213,0.0014028621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952212,0.003040643,0.00009391298,0.00020325251,0.00033966434,0.0011012405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995509,0.0028517128,0.0008513516,0.00019230007,0.00018341458,0.00041207444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044805296,0.00023481478,0.00025338866,0.001295618,0.02153315,0.0065250457,0.0012078108,0.0034602636,0.0033678128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00893095,0.00026452975,0.00020052254,0.0013053344,0.025150334,0.003408249,0.008652215,0.0032424831,0.00017257221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014906029,0.00003371964,0.0084157325,0.00007300347,0.000010876889,0.0025117334,0.7693121,0.000062272265,0.0007564821,0.20124325,0.0010784271,0.016487489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010632914,0.00007525185,0.020153696,0.0004173731,0.000024262457,0.0011077924,0.88349646,0.0003612361,0.0009115028,0.03425609,0.05915759,0.000028008546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03264026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06513723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03264026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007821652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00651899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06490052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413859395","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2025.2548864","title":"Identifying LGBTQ2S+ candidates: comparing three approaches","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10985982022839605,"score_gpt":0.3335785430419219,"score_spread":0.22371872281352587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413859395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6515374,0.020397792,0.15059653,0.020829381,0.00073195266,0.007649667,0.0056288233,0.00056333694,0.14206506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84817064,0.005010323,0.12377036,0.0030754153,0.00018264692,0.009019107,0.0028855207,0.00011521396,0.0077708117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9196035,0.060802307,0.004093067,0.0027023372,0.01051371,0.0022849701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8520919,0.0974811,0.014251982,0.009068273,0.023968095,0.003138625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070039235,0.00079721597,0.0011455319,0.017867623,0.0038623542,0.00527765,0.003088335,0.0021142089,0.007089997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1583123,0.0006580533,0.0018239979,0.0146010555,0.0033279036,0.005803008,0.008692386,0.0014651322,0.0013492093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022156783,0.00066048116,0.36236274,0.0076817437,0.0016323068,0.0002795188,0.06021463,0.0023795574,0.0015007944,0.06772285,0.011321053,0.48202866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074660766,0.0022748932,0.55833,0.006220885,0.0020378705,0.00080163265,0.22882055,0.011292974,0.0057429243,0.056391705,0.12667115,0.00066874945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030746069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07773591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070039235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059142024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011121263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37040728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}