{"meta":{"query_hash":"d8b8585f373a","filters":{"venue":"Popular Communication"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d8b8585f373a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Popular+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2466650387","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2016.1179546","title":"<i>Television and the meaning of “live”: An enquiry into the human situation</i>, by Paddy Scannell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sociology; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035924543983866,"score_gpt":0.3212692296135543,"score_spread":0.2853446856296883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466650387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044658333,0.18238558,0.0011592098,0.75488484,0.012241432,0.000028392558,0.000060132275,0.000035260884,0.044739325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23546568,0.28664538,0.0036176315,0.3753389,0.02324919,0.00022475574,0.000080990656,0.0003497567,0.07502768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532926,0.0036083462,0.00008982655,0.00025998199,0.00056947005,0.00014318911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900907,0.0083728125,0.0002698091,0.0001726602,0.00072200666,0.00037204154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044724992,0.0006861976,0.0006198466,0.0017768516,0.008067118,0.009565572,0.0012844524,0.004644164,0.00320359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009591982,0.0004026149,0.00037523266,0.0016848142,0.019097986,0.016268652,0.0034527343,0.01206239,0.00069078564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007643618,0.000029375951,0.00083051086,0.0006438994,0.000021077301,0.00042602196,0.10376372,0.000100161575,0.00042863094,0.19666094,0.66176516,0.035254113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086739155,0.000036927177,0.00095425645,0.0014821776,0.000009567403,0.0006707018,0.058510683,0.00014827453,0.00028775446,0.0316546,0.9061906,0.000045630433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019096276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029708026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019096276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003511013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033569054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037970245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605672688","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2016.1269909","title":"Verified: Self-presentation, identity management, and selfhood in the age of big data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Identity (music); Capitalism; Sociology; Identity management; Big data; Social identity theory; Aesthetics; Social group; Computer science; Political science; Politics; Social science; Law; Art; Authentication (law)","score_opus":0.12418105615239805,"score_gpt":0.299962979630496,"score_spread":0.17578192347809796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605672688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38904628,0.0073404415,0.05592449,0.20905833,0.002756999,0.00010499811,0.00043426477,0.00037425096,0.33495995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850546,0.0009239035,0.0028168869,0.0027889772,0.00043797382,0.00003019259,0.00006563003,0.00006556829,0.007816191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948225,0.003289906,0.00015757294,0.00040732164,0.00097451376,0.0003482432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896902,0.0056059626,0.0012363876,0.0017441349,0.0010176573,0.0007055409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075355065,0.0002970378,0.00023110794,0.0015969389,0.0058112256,0.013088778,0.0007197898,0.0021026726,0.005223217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015914917,0.00019171974,0.0002911049,0.0017054772,0.02426284,0.021089867,0.0069764266,0.0030320208,0.0007983677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006818294,0.000025330826,0.0078091067,0.00008797045,0.0000103931625,0.0002221444,0.11778492,0.00013375211,0.0005354632,0.82564193,0.009587811,0.03809305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001604214,0.000057424902,0.006695036,0.00035243435,0.000015631686,0.00055998523,0.11981643,0.0016825949,0.0017900098,0.6001023,0.26884463,0.000067445115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018080213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015558173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013088778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027738146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020509455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039852023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898772754","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2018.1535657","title":"“That’s what I’m talking about”: Twitter as a promotional tool for political journalists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Politics; Promotion (chess); Social media; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Scope (computer science); Competition (biology); Sociology; Advertising; Political science; Media studies; Business; Law","score_opus":0.08759161927004215,"score_gpt":0.38706522661937726,"score_spread":0.2994736073493351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898772754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9014839,0.0017950549,0.001387427,0.025585897,0.00041022865,0.00010703628,0.00024212035,0.000117239964,0.0688712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98725617,0.00079227955,0.00074175483,0.0015935213,0.00020679283,0.000058515852,0.000093889634,0.000049052767,0.009208063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679923,0.0021118291,0.000051527266,0.00012939396,0.00048372045,0.00042422782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99268675,0.003940599,0.0010417328,0.0002258744,0.000863659,0.0012414732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004271758,0.0003362428,0.0003066001,0.0018242646,0.010950122,0.010304322,0.0006040636,0.0010644317,0.003161642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009380734,0.00027238566,0.00018537205,0.0022548975,0.0063332864,0.004807596,0.0022460257,0.0014031216,0.0009474303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037287796,0.00012738277,0.053228807,0.00039326938,0.00003116036,0.0018090116,0.85432965,0.00006833763,0.0058739134,0.0066529256,0.016259167,0.06085352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025988094,0.0001190409,0.08475695,0.0004054953,0.000045442066,0.00054360303,0.7008153,0.00034479576,0.0021671806,0.0010601474,0.20964529,0.00007070969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09925562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21211432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09925562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006962889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006204637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1973558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095437739","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2020.1839075","title":"“Palpably Ugly” or “beauty of their form”?: Corsets in Toronto periodicals, 1871-1914","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Globe; Beauty; Media studies; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Sociology; Advertising; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08049083032258203,"score_gpt":0.2775186536142434,"score_spread":0.19702782329166135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095437739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6612268,0.032459795,0.0003749464,0.019325918,0.0016846437,0.00007816331,0.0027761522,0.00011814832,0.28195548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142513,0.009128677,0.00016683074,0.0005774014,0.00020584467,0.000018284445,0.00033640236,0.00009493715,0.075220324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881834,0.00018168965,0.000045971818,0.00012160677,0.0005200154,0.00031237383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972941,0.00077173166,0.0004954412,0.00013610412,0.0007068232,0.0005959003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011190233,0.00059277716,0.00034739153,0.0044041313,0.01579068,0.006637955,0.00067528593,0.000848078,0.009285904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003794104,0.0004370304,0.00015329613,0.00889677,0.014400314,0.0019374358,0.0028916798,0.0013340558,0.00075754593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007663438,0.000010222059,0.0072767856,0.00033616865,0.0000095695505,0.0012826485,0.89340943,0.00006648549,0.00066092116,0.03267368,0.04221012,0.021987358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000505151,0.000021558051,0.056246087,0.00044111727,0.000021126187,0.00034770014,0.42456242,0.000048799928,0.0006241681,0.0006109851,0.517037,0.00003404296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9082127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96919507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09178728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08333194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03030446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60461843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106644014","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2020.1839079","title":"Makeover media as fashion journalism: <i>What Not To Wear</i> , fashion, authority, and <i>Gonzo</i> subjectivity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Journalism; Sociology; Media studies; Style (visual arts); Subject (documents); Aesthetics; Advertising; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; Epistemology; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06497505587407044,"score_gpt":0.2761563718873973,"score_spread":0.21118131601332685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106644014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18383461,0.006816155,0.00410566,0.03471974,0.0017932215,0.000032402906,0.000084074,0.00017039177,0.7684438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95440453,0.0020658954,0.0006074491,0.0017641864,0.00078968966,0.00002733147,0.00002772008,0.00012536916,0.040187787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895084,0.0006688925,0.000021300633,0.000068493704,0.00018382836,0.000106543404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723804,0.0020742419,0.00022991339,0.00017451501,0.000114929244,0.00016836054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013054314,0.00030918143,0.00014800209,0.0010905307,0.0053460747,0.014286337,0.0003639185,0.001553775,0.004254211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00312582,0.00018939226,0.0001353614,0.0013492146,0.018311214,0.0046951314,0.0027892431,0.0022832463,0.00038363558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074004616,0.000043815937,0.002754417,0.00020561484,0.000008112456,0.00055011903,0.32208642,0.000102456775,0.0027140668,0.6211238,0.019176468,0.031160656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014696712,0.00007499867,0.008973212,0.00051045296,0.000023323437,0.0005759406,0.28127426,0.00039046654,0.0027891456,0.055824984,0.64950967,0.000038718572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043884073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014286337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002091987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010381152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015178502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155113662","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2021.1913491","title":"Offshoring &amp; leaking: Cristiano Ronaldo’s tax evasion, and celebrity in neoliberal times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Football; Referendum; Political science; Earnings; Inefficiency; Economic Justice; Elite; Political economy; Immigration; Economics; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0640856400540699,"score_gpt":0.2647637769863685,"score_spread":0.20067813693229858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155113662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6056759,0.0031961494,0.00044250424,0.061083253,0.00035229014,0.000011396884,0.000058807767,0.00003695014,0.32914278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602676,0.00060073653,0.00006028592,0.0011198992,0.0001237605,0.0000034566651,0.00001061437,0.00001798615,0.012036425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988067,0.0005821557,0.000017810024,0.00012489977,0.0002046258,0.0002636936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964316,0.0017117896,0.00085043727,0.00029843766,0.00027457517,0.00043308685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023575872,0.00019976073,0.00022745482,0.0011327664,0.005693174,0.0060103033,0.00049539545,0.0016967545,0.0036543976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074495506,0.00010866176,0.00012966631,0.0014330109,0.008256295,0.0022329374,0.0022914654,0.0023431925,0.00028117813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028972613,0.00018201317,0.027162075,0.00014335851,0.000024681618,0.0015761702,0.33353385,0.00034889366,0.00066814735,0.5221837,0.060850225,0.05303716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024973315,0.00004372887,0.048895467,0.00036750868,0.000021360056,0.0005903421,0.23190854,0.0005790795,0.0005433846,0.021461431,0.69549453,0.00006959323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04375024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054297075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04375024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048413463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018020655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08699113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203327162","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2021.1985503","title":"Headlocks in lockdown: working the at-home crowd","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Sports, Gender, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Precarity; Liveness; Mediation; Crowds; Feeling; Pleasure; Spectacle; Work (physics); Sociology; Advertising; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Business; Computer security; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06821525677132136,"score_gpt":0.32863860768403663,"score_spread":0.2604233509127153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203327162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159938,0.00095439615,0.0012495666,0.0042080753,0.0003379955,0.000029110257,0.000031837306,0.000034140092,0.0771611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98779464,0.00045765145,0.00032169413,0.00069824053,0.00009634373,0.000017558217,0.000019531422,0.000023930264,0.010570437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998164,0.0009872987,0.000026282454,0.00016518497,0.00018577294,0.00047147155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988273,0.000415951,0.00018628327,0.00008786351,0.000107276705,0.0003753728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015452654,0.00057439675,0.00026979073,0.0012786381,0.012929829,0.006480003,0.00082206784,0.0014593682,0.00743513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025456692,0.00026781735,0.00028972104,0.0005519421,0.009661316,0.0038853956,0.007945357,0.0023102686,0.0008882703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088263856,0.0001306355,0.018961819,0.00012051348,0.000019617659,0.00125855,0.9297769,0.00008273241,0.0014832894,0.015442028,0.006639836,0.02599573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005874134,0.000093524766,0.006754575,0.000106641826,0.0000102156655,0.00026988087,0.94921523,0.00008268052,0.00029331105,0.0015324434,0.041617785,0.000017815315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014479384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031482764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014479384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018392762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001275625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028790236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220673446","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2022.2050238","title":"How conspiracy theorists argue: epistemic capital in the QAnon social media sphere","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Spiritualities; Epistemology; Narrative; Power (physics); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Social epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Spirituality","score_opus":0.046668727765388884,"score_gpt":0.3092786981038109,"score_spread":0.26260997033842204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220673446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6730863,0.001750454,0.030197501,0.073683254,0.00029879544,0.00015469463,0.000095934985,0.00004577603,0.22068726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969331,0.00012600765,0.001103027,0.00063500216,0.000023603612,0.000028337789,0.000007984462,0.0000129621,0.0011298303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98321354,0.0118319085,0.00041136428,0.001424364,0.0018550619,0.0012637207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447639,0.04628873,0.00334963,0.002877529,0.0017321883,0.0009879242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022472525,0.0004343944,0.00062864204,0.0043801568,0.007965468,0.017677812,0.0014383845,0.003124486,0.0050922926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045139197,0.00056069554,0.0004617678,0.0025789177,0.0526248,0.024251994,0.010959779,0.005090623,0.00042034575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054090433,0.000042783096,0.0064381845,0.00009996925,0.00001899709,0.0002852926,0.3939222,0.0002114483,0.00038876352,0.5899965,0.000826219,0.0077156196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028524939,0.000033881406,0.005379734,0.0004387916,0.000026691874,0.00022045677,0.41909283,0.00195808,0.0005746208,0.5446452,0.027557308,0.000043846638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005123858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022472525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051639574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003780212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11884755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403392197","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2024.2414120","title":"How to be a fanboy: <i>Wizard</i> magazine and the pedagogy of comic book fandom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Trent University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fandom; Comics; Wizard; Wizard of oz; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Literature; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029916988224288635,"score_gpt":0.32836478242371137,"score_spread":0.29844779419942274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403392197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25904393,0.0054224385,0.008093448,0.02998435,0.0010405885,0.0000811411,0.000025997077,0.00022306327,0.69608504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92068905,0.0019018997,0.0021368242,0.0029077965,0.00021949984,0.000045638033,0.000017244973,0.00011885682,0.07196314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.0006245778,0.00001298419,0.000076887234,0.000106088286,0.000108221975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989208,0.0005702588,0.000092949675,0.000054686137,0.000120344914,0.0002409421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014013507,0.0003901588,0.00014897194,0.0010806853,0.0067091333,0.009155389,0.0005107976,0.0011375708,0.00513965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021827621,0.00021247975,0.00012520672,0.00046809646,0.011025337,0.004753873,0.0019563911,0.0029195813,0.000858056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030319756,0.00016856418,0.0052406634,0.00012687141,0.00000612801,0.00057689945,0.5651371,0.00005392215,0.0012728127,0.31668302,0.040887013,0.06981664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014790285,0.000080447644,0.0046904874,0.00036440947,0.000009347129,0.00069146435,0.29905593,0.00028906652,0.001266047,0.03001225,0.6635068,0.000018901104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003813637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010623814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009155389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019189726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010558547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017193854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406025278","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2024.2447001","title":"“This one's for the sapphics”: Mamamoo, “Girl Crush,” and Transcultural Networks Through Queer Fan Labor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Asian Culture and Media Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Girl; Fandom; Gender studies; Sociology; Art; Advertising; Media studies; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.03770861150308189,"score_gpt":0.3408687684559849,"score_spread":0.303160156952903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406025278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88190454,0.00042764848,0.0019402895,0.004693939,0.00015870751,0.000026239126,0.000046557736,0.000043569504,0.11075844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98859555,0.00018668115,0.00023717475,0.00028428066,0.000031667692,0.000012006732,0.000011970923,0.000021714444,0.01061898],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960655,0.0002464888,0.0000051705288,0.00003803018,0.000033720906,0.0000701317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994721,0.0002260246,0.00008526724,0.00005004048,0.00003934433,0.00012721827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009057364,0.00032423364,0.00012067082,0.00054875534,0.0071731047,0.0031548967,0.0003639643,0.00046545925,0.006230562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017214713,0.00012736155,0.00012247227,0.00041953268,0.007937266,0.002856086,0.002916073,0.0012363461,0.00034545257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007256744,0.000027975613,0.009551163,0.00007536161,0.000007232504,0.0010568082,0.918354,0.000044986016,0.0022740772,0.049305335,0.0033215908,0.01590896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057297902,0.000042233212,0.007341623,0.00010843547,0.000011741202,0.0005592399,0.903961,0.00016721826,0.00093175546,0.0043463423,0.08251121,0.000013491519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045533725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011239637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071731047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009508953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086600333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020843327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413997610","doi":"10.1080/15405702.2025.2552779","title":"<i>Below Deck</i> : politics and paradoxes of class conflict on reality television","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Popular Communication","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reality tv; Reality television; Deck; Class conflict; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Political economy; Aesthetics; Law; Art; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.060852620396379196,"score_gpt":0.3690546095961099,"score_spread":0.30820198919973074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413997610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41280866,0.00213357,0.0023942387,0.040930454,0.00083547615,0.000019959058,0.00013044826,0.000045542358,0.5407016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976177,0.00031329656,0.00012119123,0.0011651642,0.00020475427,0.000010339206,0.000020340482,0.000042460983,0.008360697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978473,0.0014364922,0.000027226393,0.00016299407,0.00026019738,0.00026580162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996786,0.0024604779,0.00025174647,0.00016982794,0.0001369197,0.00019506257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020479038,0.00022576285,0.00022892276,0.0015248953,0.0091051925,0.011444274,0.0008031333,0.001608873,0.0073666624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005276782,0.00017622784,0.00016853571,0.0013579677,0.020463593,0.0054176627,0.0040417365,0.002997169,0.00042409313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007553029,0.000027220221,0.002604313,0.000071857714,0.000007667988,0.00033483485,0.40282667,0.00008637642,0.0007137338,0.5654666,0.017113302,0.010671902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016046468,0.000038344868,0.007445514,0.00033521032,0.0000123083,0.00027656686,0.6014676,0.0004186219,0.0011464849,0.056025483,0.33278355,0.000034325534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009670577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010227896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011444274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004095759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084874366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029716969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}