{"meta":{"query_hash":"ddd29141b5ec","filters":{"venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ddd29141b5ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Potchefstroom+Electronic+Law+Journal%2FPotchefstroomse+Elektroniese+Regsblad"},"results":[{"id":"W118265215","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i2a2817","title":"Deference and Diffèrance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Judicial deference; Economic Justice; Positivism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Liberalism; Relation (database); Judicial restraint; Action (physics); Political science; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.010716278119482435,"score_gpt":0.30772149438429386,"score_spread":0.2970052162648114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118265215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21302834,0.033883624,0.025558755,0.2751858,0.0010682924,0.000075646785,0.000062863386,0.00009866954,0.4510379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893784,0.0012489618,0.00067962694,0.0039485646,0.00025504318,0.000012733177,0.0000042009106,0.000007769329,0.0044647558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97970515,0.010699266,0.000996504,0.0014902552,0.005075687,0.0020331268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673996,0.020378234,0.0036990873,0.0024795225,0.0037637085,0.002279922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01760363,0.00019742525,0.0004921518,0.002311952,0.007141216,0.010357843,0.0010584217,0.0055234837,0.0021534427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04598892,0.00026685314,0.0003176299,0.001446529,0.03902527,0.008888948,0.006183404,0.0043889116,0.00023479755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014247229,0.00000702979,0.00041372713,0.000030127749,0.000004144251,0.0001323485,0.002883462,0.00014048656,0.00008650612,0.9897635,0.0010553238,0.0054690223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057088317,0.00005877289,0.0023432083,0.00022398308,0.000016499536,0.00042414665,0.0030040168,0.0006472604,0.0003305353,0.92715037,0.06570593,0.00003820295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012850675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012538059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01760363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012474605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011859607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093098044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981031201","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2001/v4i1a2878","title":"Utilizing constitutional values in constitutional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Constitutional law; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Public law; Mores; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03607853444442566,"score_gpt":0.3597977281514343,"score_spread":0.32371919370700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981031201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029042743,0.0059359297,0.414454,0.019649256,0.00093970215,0.0003571224,0.00025688706,0.00016676137,0.5291977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815137,0.0023868135,0.16905633,0.0017336896,0.0006261424,0.00096725475,0.00017785998,0.00016569176,0.0097491685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9473591,0.043828625,0.0011208336,0.0020973403,0.0040880307,0.0015061034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735979,0.018959384,0.0015191986,0.0032662607,0.0019534263,0.0007037883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045126077,0.000783789,0.0010707985,0.009176327,0.007429543,0.017043848,0.0024315072,0.0042693387,0.005866751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04553247,0.00056004553,0.0007167517,0.007340922,0.053189516,0.024197131,0.011161793,0.0057070167,0.00050878053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017991089,0.0000019557883,0.00004217951,0.000009245334,0.0000015478582,0.000008754475,0.00044405946,0.00008191705,0.000012365502,0.9973495,0.0001301295,0.0019165302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005414169,0.000010424219,0.00009547505,0.000056924753,0.0000042109696,0.000019558538,0.0010437957,0.0003854266,0.0001140643,0.9826979,0.015557458,0.000009398727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022582565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030993372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045126077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010590966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00567912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23865235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999535358","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2691","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; Law; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Duty; Legislation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059355931468528064,"score_gpt":0.3419609162935602,"score_spread":0.2826049848250321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999535358","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103388295,0.0054623466,0.037574004,0.4787263,0.0020341673,0.0004670304,0.00014760844,0.000110261855,0.37208995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91461265,0.001277061,0.0076403324,0.058759447,0.00035840162,0.00024077923,0.000017595174,0.000046737543,0.01704685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97311515,0.015938422,0.00067333516,0.0025183037,0.005485428,0.002269457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97908187,0.01739224,0.00071370427,0.00096774206,0.0011067054,0.00073778594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032635484,0.0004910298,0.000781677,0.001256946,0.007437537,0.01026302,0.004388812,0.014213249,0.0040354454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035199963,0.00061450474,0.00095139234,0.0010990351,0.043379597,0.010764116,0.009371371,0.014622065,0.0004123032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034242926,0.0000028917607,0.000059128426,0.000010023157,0.0000014178153,0.000061234605,0.002357114,0.0001016806,0.00002802164,0.9956513,0.0009775031,0.00074627204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009725487,0.00009468161,0.0007538392,0.0005294564,0.000038445447,0.00020840336,0.008543824,0.003295633,0.0006962694,0.8544787,0.13116191,0.00010151346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07617446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09868291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07617446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015591952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028213605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17259496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013299482","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i2a2498","title":"Comparative analysis of access to patented HIV/AIDS pharmaceutical medicines through the Canadian and EU TRIPS flexibilities measures: are they efficacious or overly burdensome and ineffective measures?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Access to medicines; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); TRIPS Agreement; Medicine; Business; Actuarial science; Traditional medicine; Intellectual property; Virology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11063137299792307,"score_gpt":0.3449586732713687,"score_spread":0.23432730027344562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013299482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85247856,0.0114020705,0.00071883673,0.0038317288,0.000049746155,0.00019074198,0.009591993,0.00006672763,0.12166964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98843014,0.0026721125,0.00024108269,0.00022532235,0.00001672303,0.000016712269,0.001044884,0.0000061031765,0.0073467684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763834,0.00025867042,0.00008190944,0.00017540781,0.0010106551,0.00083496416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956255,0.0014835,0.0009767113,0.00016518826,0.0012393139,0.0005098019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233765,0.00019122788,0.00032580088,0.002548441,0.00091127993,0.0030285476,0.000776788,0.00051407726,0.012164955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410447,0.000089553374,0.00057173264,0.004264282,0.0010672346,0.001057284,0.0010379391,0.0008116687,0.0003695262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003320619,0.0005491262,0.46448004,0.0025351476,0.0015083052,0.0010345917,0.0048771226,0.008254539,0.0044767074,0.1303474,0.02564816,0.3529683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095149,0.00039925773,0.93692005,0.00024749796,0.00055415,0.00022726922,0.0038628804,0.001679386,0.0015654406,0.0018600855,0.05252088,0.00006796381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8631804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9016341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98453254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015467453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017303597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27525067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014559428","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2310","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Conviction; Action (physics); Cause of action; Discretion; Political science; Reasonable doubt; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.0806131554190942,"score_gpt":0.39180385668970136,"score_spread":0.31119070127060716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014559428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042299824,0.96426135,0.00042451735,0.019194033,0.0006925698,0.000028370187,0.000024748457,0.0000048465035,0.011139615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051026564,0.9399301,0.00056279096,0.0059616435,0.000663741,0.000030435102,0.000017946268,0.0000116091915,0.0017950891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940513,0.0019842067,0.000979326,0.00034903712,0.0020641095,0.00057196873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664906,0.026405552,0.0026182903,0.00040591543,0.003396346,0.00068335544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015776467,0.0006891339,0.00082291075,0.013769627,0.003442431,0.0068829693,0.0016851496,0.004344217,0.00274565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145401,0.00090845546,0.000733482,0.014760658,0.01393355,0.006918952,0.0030758216,0.00477777,0.0005390266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817979,0.00013303709,0.008851568,0.022916665,0.00011576753,0.0041378075,0.041608207,0.0007767948,0.0011084266,0.32531944,0.068587676,0.5263564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018951032,0.00014053917,0.02483398,0.074455984,0.00015178022,0.0035431592,0.01869874,0.00036949816,0.00061753613,0.03379893,0.84325653,0.00011435161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036379114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07177958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036379114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029637525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08343494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039212520","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Compliance (psychology); Law; Promotion (chess); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021897228404757003,"score_gpt":0.3507606884253308,"score_spread":0.3288634600205738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039212520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4508855,0.0056932764,0.010134095,0.025203846,0.0007476975,0.00023751844,0.00005697203,0.000018216093,0.5070229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686307,0.0015401801,0.0007623528,0.0023782484,0.00042185036,0.00009170266,0.000016069556,0.000021807668,0.026137142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801728,0.006115353,0.00097137084,0.0009943238,0.005708835,0.006037324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98260814,0.011319795,0.0030706062,0.00064177864,0.001833429,0.00052627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011249016,0.0005063885,0.00084158353,0.0026475037,0.0144824395,0.014146626,0.0024189996,0.011323877,0.005144607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031848703,0.0006121592,0.00095319655,0.0024054558,0.018936789,0.0052938387,0.008492552,0.01064827,0.00071843737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385816,0.000076138815,0.0052843005,0.00013334709,0.000016103491,0.0030477447,0.020476598,0.0008120273,0.0007020354,0.9568218,0.0016740304,0.01089196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111155605,0.000584193,0.07799168,0.0030794796,0.00019447545,0.0034164982,0.16011252,0.00503409,0.004667059,0.5041634,0.24026677,0.00037861647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02378622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037545625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02378622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012425722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008954748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09015536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076502478","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i3a2353","title":"Legal Research Methodology and the Dream of Interdisciplinarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Universitetet i Oslo; Princeton University; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Premise; Multidisciplinary approach; Empiricism; Discipline; Falsifiability; Human science; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Social science; Law; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21702400558179524,"score_gpt":0.5118720691138577,"score_spread":0.2948480635320625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076502478","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022188198,0.04439973,0.50343376,0.2828219,0.002654792,0.0007344149,0.00012776842,0.00041528468,0.14322412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545466,0.014598596,0.20143187,0.01639028,0.0027582375,0.002687923,0.00011221639,0.00023616767,0.007238215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.579592,0.37323678,0.006958307,0.013549001,0.024137424,0.0025263906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62290066,0.28411886,0.013534075,0.05023397,0.021115102,0.008097458],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29022112,0.0013184319,0.0029010137,0.012368234,0.0113345375,0.030061131,0.0059553636,0.00885055,0.003236846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17030229,0.0014507566,0.0013312211,0.008591815,0.13132595,0.03947565,0.024511991,0.013374627,0.0011846437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009582962,0.000035826968,0.0003187223,0.00026025117,0.000039742703,0.000041722033,0.00933834,0.000291085,0.0000632531,0.9761535,0.001151393,0.012296638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019147963,0.00001958898,0.00009630951,0.00042329213,0.000007652201,0.000035103043,0.0030797112,0.00044894504,0.00007801822,0.9805727,0.015207579,0.000011938745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017542838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012740502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7097789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012941714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027817644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8752837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084412400","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.06","title":"The liability of churches for the historical sexual assault of children by priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Test (biology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.012536297173417258,"score_gpt":0.2760796712263531,"score_spread":0.2635433740529358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7163461,0.0021561345,0.0009421386,0.016039109,0.00024076496,0.00007233344,0.000109650005,0.000018083687,0.26407576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657817,0.0003875017,0.0001938646,0.0019712292,0.000062582505,0.00001664582,0.000016649328,0.0000029993053,0.010770257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743134,0.0006492182,0.000121216544,0.00022759751,0.00062919286,0.00094150135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751914,0.0009250956,0.0003075386,0.00032846455,0.00043577148,0.00048400517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023172563,0.00015451049,0.00022451267,0.00074720616,0.0069648535,0.0029493454,0.0011892959,0.005345839,0.0035215071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00837136,0.0004138602,0.0005254175,0.0002456335,0.008358825,0.0016281612,0.00346644,0.005976108,0.00034037646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002353601,0.00016252651,0.068283595,0.00012746699,0.00009794413,0.014555736,0.04799309,0.00074795005,0.004265761,0.81282306,0.017732818,0.032974765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026139707,0.0011233831,0.27871314,0.0022436967,0.0005122433,0.031057509,0.08173463,0.0031752782,0.011194373,0.14755712,0.4419528,0.00047445024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10435314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19883242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10435314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034273395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054455264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20749146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088114035","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i2a2728","title":"Die Impak en Grondwetlikheid van die Reg om te Staak met Betrekking tot Noodsaaklike Dienste – 'n Vergelykende Studie","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Position (finance); Law; Business","score_opus":0.018726474126044543,"score_gpt":0.3248098539873243,"score_spread":0.30608337986127976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088114035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2616596,0.28521752,0.010616714,0.061750606,0.0062469696,0.0013264156,0.002914903,0.0000590744,0.37020814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71026325,0.16569966,0.007082671,0.014151082,0.001270361,0.0022011572,0.0021096938,0.00018572043,0.09703644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98872316,0.006040364,0.0008797202,0.0008285418,0.0027740055,0.0007542758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438406,0.011092627,0.0015878773,0.0009547443,0.0015112928,0.00046942243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011523152,0.00044156975,0.00080315355,0.001587937,0.002601256,0.011536961,0.0012307896,0.0012865842,0.02524321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033412695,0.00050564785,0.0006870509,0.0021645112,0.002699792,0.009331637,0.0044983393,0.002007844,0.0040281215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004986419,0.0008815469,0.036351904,0.01619483,0.00093462114,0.0006200422,0.13411978,0.0008202835,0.001086209,0.27021965,0.08820321,0.45006922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004499577,0.00023828902,0.029242197,0.019226989,0.00030180323,0.00037948476,0.09241975,0.00020819844,0.0009157194,0.028699456,0.82825595,0.000067142035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101624215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023908745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02524321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036595215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009476439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08444697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113237779","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i2a2479","title":"Decentralisation in Africa: A critical review of Uganda's experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Accountability; Public administration; Service delivery framework; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Local government; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Corporate governance; Political science; Central government; Service (business); Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics; Economy; Management","score_opus":0.1103857489927654,"score_gpt":0.4148214548680573,"score_spread":0.3044357058752919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113237779","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018398507,0.9991142,0.000013240623,0.00032272562,0.00006063158,0.000002691058,0.000004387729,5.7706114e-7,0.0002975059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034975247,0.9960842,0.000048640028,0.00020414396,0.00006302602,0.000008508772,0.000006999706,9.202058e-7,0.00008591318],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807596,0.0010303924,0.00029037864,0.00015605423,0.00030193682,0.00014517513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943732,0.0040164525,0.0006700663,0.00008155739,0.00068996375,0.00016870422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043876343,0.0006474538,0.0016015185,0.006574528,0.0011228048,0.0026251925,0.0009974022,0.0016078807,0.0021129327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010080261,0.00059480354,0.0004926564,0.012108152,0.0021675352,0.0031344348,0.0018038453,0.0019004921,0.0003465657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017903517,0.00009198135,0.0013210225,0.18986282,0.00032498268,0.0011459327,0.008619643,0.0006679012,0.00042873458,0.03208378,0.04232712,0.722947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021837192,0.00012954535,0.0051121167,0.11176607,0.0002536912,0.0013298434,0.0038991203,0.000052652053,0.0001914673,0.0023984357,0.87481254,0.000032701697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069150086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013657741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069150086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042056274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008183539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030514121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113683616","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.04","title":"Arbitration of family separation issues – a useful adjunct to mediation and the court process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Arbitration clause; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010679055463419719,"score_gpt":0.3214630370797933,"score_spread":0.31078398161637355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113683616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014789601,0.0871143,0.13828616,0.11127013,0.0029804667,0.00020105943,0.00005701738,0.00014424977,0.64515704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83280224,0.024590371,0.039169747,0.0077477917,0.0031771336,0.00021580547,0.000046900503,0.0000956046,0.09215444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730377,0.02069045,0.00074902584,0.0011111235,0.003037259,0.0013745336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915244,0.005708715,0.00091330643,0.00084077416,0.0005848757,0.0004279638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015489782,0.0006338714,0.00087611104,0.0020948648,0.010402599,0.013619881,0.00224721,0.006417276,0.011156337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015863374,0.0003136218,0.00069476815,0.002451514,0.025060898,0.014938986,0.012513871,0.006725404,0.0014326621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005207517,0.0000043448317,0.00005073729,0.000036824895,0.0000029088956,0.00014558903,0.0030999926,0.00012968261,0.000055128407,0.9858906,0.0022244977,0.008354442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008405633,0.000028643506,0.00018082806,0.000297685,0.0000071838926,0.0004108862,0.0034015444,0.00057697925,0.00029998203,0.69880986,0.29595253,0.00002541651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00428047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041257213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015489782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047918004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065652356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081918776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115924852","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2319","title":"The Impact on Women on the Removal of Gender as a Rating Variable in Motor-Vehicle Insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Yale University","keywords":"Actuarial science; Disadvantaged; Legislation; Variable (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01805414983900718,"score_gpt":0.3180676394324125,"score_spread":0.30001348959340535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115924852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70846486,0.0017550974,0.003021797,0.040432844,0.0009852446,0.0002065575,0.0002983398,0.000032349937,0.24480288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713111,0.0006310349,0.0006577689,0.014141921,0.0002203456,0.00005628044,0.000049274928,0.000016802791,0.012915475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830466,0.004602514,0.00060995267,0.0012687289,0.006246708,0.0042254906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730416,0.017961634,0.0032818813,0.0012730941,0.0031526664,0.0012892002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01407832,0.00025743118,0.0004179346,0.0010733738,0.004874888,0.003193694,0.001156777,0.0026060059,0.0073612737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039975304,0.00032208476,0.0011758786,0.0009366187,0.0043296497,0.0016224147,0.0035539763,0.0044306093,0.00064639794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014499662,0.0005094753,0.30386734,0.00044078086,0.00030023634,0.0068977247,0.034827467,0.0017722088,0.01239336,0.4511976,0.031244954,0.15509881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002361493,0.0015534139,0.6276621,0.0020038986,0.0012108146,0.0033316,0.02753102,0.0034305379,0.027650876,0.027374316,0.2777202,0.0002950438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07159204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13647893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07159204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006847438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14235061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131814071","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Law; Democracy; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Enforcement; Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.030630525159094132,"score_gpt":0.32502375730937255,"score_spread":0.2943932321502784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131814071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19995643,0.005146684,0.017746875,0.017861256,0.00049964496,0.00036265288,0.00038874446,0.00008947503,0.7579482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926736,0.000942226,0.0028920455,0.0026297492,0.0002940107,0.00038201787,0.00004977653,0.000034230394,0.013508514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98178077,0.005679163,0.0018845423,0.0027121317,0.004786494,0.0031568576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98032117,0.013193669,0.0019436363,0.002415113,0.0015491904,0.0005772154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015719697,0.0003502482,0.0008295781,0.0025481319,0.011282956,0.012706181,0.0017290957,0.006065246,0.005367528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027928004,0.0011041631,0.00070118206,0.002299012,0.038065966,0.0076240776,0.0069802296,0.009515364,0.0008230786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012982446,0.000005378409,0.00029140513,0.000016504768,0.0000032873759,0.000076678116,0.0015275507,0.000081291015,0.00016776782,0.99577916,0.0004250762,0.001613009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014264647,0.00016229038,0.0069146166,0.0009701348,0.00015933637,0.00065023475,0.003832178,0.0023779834,0.004161669,0.8393933,0.14105949,0.00017610105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026339918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024986463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026339918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008985199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012649349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142835003","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2650","title":"Restructuring of Insolvent Corporations in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Restructuring; Creditor; Business; Payment; Debt restructuring; Statute; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Debt; Political science; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.012023456429599743,"score_gpt":0.20293185715586642,"score_spread":0.1909084007262667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142835003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3595451,0.003196812,0.0041613174,0.015776914,0.00022322281,0.0006207113,0.0010952057,0.00032414304,0.6150566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78256834,0.0027769296,0.0030375847,0.0034822298,0.000039972074,0.00009847792,0.0008156687,0.00004393005,0.2071369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972217,0.000074278294,0.000051185565,0.00015633147,0.0008774951,0.0016190115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835557,0.000081433354,0.00009870046,0.000077041936,0.0007707133,0.0006165538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054039055,0.0003151204,0.00026974236,0.0020604539,0.011767863,0.0057396567,0.0015404138,0.0017096814,0.008317887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024493728,0.0004133579,0.0003811698,0.0027984148,0.004114073,0.0011154839,0.0028498918,0.002634042,0.0005197884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008224603,0.00019096822,0.019308697,0.0001389636,0.000033739314,0.003808315,0.008563088,0.009045813,0.003701008,0.8183333,0.051038634,0.08575525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008352566,0.00007664716,0.10126553,0.00026857093,0.000043533764,0.0006312705,0.010398596,0.008262064,0.0023529453,0.027076745,0.8493654,0.00017520683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13028775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13028775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16543692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160252093","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i5.01","title":"Transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms and the Cartagena protocol: key issues and concerns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; European Commission; International Fine Particle Research Institute; Global Environment Facility; Michigan State University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biosafety; Convention on Biological Diversity; Scope (computer science); International community; Genetically modified organism; Biotechnology; Convention; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Biology; Biodiversity; Law; Ecology; Geography; Politics; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02686338109358479,"score_gpt":0.2734570014326463,"score_spread":0.2465936203390615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160252093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109856175,0.014793756,0.049181405,0.5639794,0.0082076425,0.0017660443,0.0005788041,0.0006560822,0.34985116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14541264,0.016608821,0.09893037,0.46510348,0.0040317173,0.007873645,0.001251785,0.000772884,0.26001468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9325362,0.03341708,0.004197751,0.0048675104,0.020835096,0.004146265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9322518,0.045016948,0.0033846644,0.0050065955,0.012016523,0.0023234256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08319102,0.001150054,0.00083292305,0.0025863207,0.008011933,0.019438798,0.0078089624,0.041543156,0.0114869755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08667094,0.0013854925,0.0014656034,0.0036621615,0.01557675,0.029847287,0.009830696,0.0266115,0.0042888816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034183166,0.00005609223,0.0002628535,0.0003075995,0.00001160431,0.0008692023,0.0046263253,0.00038587433,0.0006202366,0.9004314,0.07618116,0.016213443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000161822,0.00003924585,0.00025204747,0.0009011645,0.000015446318,0.00077034195,0.0022672727,0.0005895314,0.00064343645,0.091674104,0.90272576,0.000105422616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024011204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0145317195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08319102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113739595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03198923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43996143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162799772","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2500","title":"Mixed and Mixing Systems Worldwide: A Preface","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Thriving; International law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02539429521708089,"score_gpt":0.2957537107665136,"score_spread":0.2703594155494327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162799772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009301146,0.22374307,0.00531217,0.13458465,0.09223196,0.00022636341,0.00042039072,0.00011606264,0.5340642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17405786,0.24027058,0.00463366,0.028734928,0.08332383,0.00046055918,0.0009578032,0.00045096464,0.46710983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994635,0.00018287802,0.000034691,0.00006692951,0.00016133035,0.00009069218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00047364738,0.000064995686,0.00007328347,0.00017741376,0.00017711116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011164444,0.00080850336,0.00044977502,0.0025068389,0.00570614,0.008784123,0.0006819557,0.0026943844,0.020757021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027876906,0.00039908185,0.00034124576,0.0026926436,0.0035927335,0.009747375,0.0034377284,0.006318513,0.0035339466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028185654,0.000071289134,0.00061310513,0.00031036304,0.000005529443,0.0003063423,0.01294261,0.00014607006,0.00028847082,0.3408371,0.52363586,0.120815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018579685,0.000013811524,0.00071493594,0.00048263563,0.0000011099156,0.00012637951,0.0030494274,0.000043937078,0.000051073144,0.021933295,0.9735744,0.0000070870274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032380864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00535178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020757021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028513423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020128426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06943917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192161463","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i3.08","title":"A Critical Appraisal of Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2011 5 SA 87 (WCC)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Perception; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03146304632993881,"score_gpt":0.31708016510968756,"score_spread":0.28561711877974877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192161463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115276305,0.035361644,0.0005222314,0.7661123,0.015166025,0.00043856073,0.00036326892,0.000048230846,0.17046008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1222713,0.014851735,0.0005971269,0.7961815,0.0060139946,0.00079868454,0.00012026727,0.00006615479,0.059099253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796475,0.006109687,0.0012254698,0.0016713424,0.0060429713,0.0053029787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97229034,0.019862624,0.0014107028,0.0006443773,0.0043698684,0.001422056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01774652,0.00148596,0.0010250425,0.0042657303,0.020982966,0.017630294,0.004091618,0.049621865,0.0052461005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04840231,0.0015926454,0.0020212654,0.0036868681,0.016558968,0.0059815296,0.004265621,0.034214485,0.0011765979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004825525,0.000044129993,0.0007754171,0.0007641154,0.000042230666,0.0021819456,0.017810127,0.00022503515,0.00048548434,0.38846213,0.57897145,0.010189726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004850979,0.00005531661,0.0044487165,0.0057666055,0.000074538504,0.0002722265,0.01652697,0.00020346245,0.0005551776,0.018921299,0.9529458,0.00018135714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28597295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33922774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28597295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028841354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058165282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5686168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289549478","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i7.04","title":"Introduction to Virtual Property: Lex Virtualis Ipsa Loquitur","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Digital Rights Management and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pretoria; University of Oxford; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; CLARITY; Computer science; Real property; Intellectual property; Personal property; Metaverse; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Virtual reality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014889422810655238,"score_gpt":0.23122459652293406,"score_spread":0.2163351737122788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289549478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013818811,0.024243329,0.006265752,0.011143226,0.0036172722,0.0000726851,0.0007872332,0.0007938268,0.9516948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048142266,0.031830512,0.0057480745,0.009798591,0.006869179,0.00046321633,0.001630226,0.001483048,0.8940348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930394,0.00020458459,0.000068901434,0.000109508954,0.00023743411,0.000075631724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999094,0.00052723434,0.00009404505,0.0000890055,0.0001208801,0.000074844225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066101295,0.0007644679,0.0005178657,0.0028283065,0.002524835,0.0065499144,0.00082324527,0.0018601719,0.12679969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019086666,0.00034750314,0.00028876087,0.0026790546,0.0025731397,0.0080333585,0.002510657,0.0036923545,0.054791674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024724011,0.000027067505,0.00018853026,0.00028596277,0.0000030101746,0.00016672998,0.00096416305,0.00011670918,0.00031739371,0.4966631,0.41014996,0.09109259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015538095,0.0000054649618,0.00013133671,0.0001734779,5.746426e-7,0.000100331636,0.00010115906,0.000033016706,0.000060340568,0.012015822,0.9873726,0.000004321187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017130694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017725307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12679969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023602378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012817523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42418724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291324282","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i6.06","title":"Cyberbullying: Should Schools choose between Safety and Privacy?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Anonymity; Monster; Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Expression (computer science); State (computer science); The Right to Privacy; Internet privacy; Right to privacy; Freedom of information; Sociology; Human rights; Public relations; The Internet; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.027093879895546673,"score_gpt":0.2606954477839584,"score_spread":0.23360156788841174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291324282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07535561,0.009047439,0.0061752275,0.83669007,0.0012996668,0.000097918826,0.000058712398,0.000049253635,0.07122609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9408202,0.0057764715,0.0019501542,0.044196244,0.00043539685,0.00008020031,0.000027263424,0.000032684737,0.0066814222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885964,0.0063311383,0.00035637876,0.0011135744,0.0013065578,0.002295973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857372,0.005634963,0.0019938555,0.0005901407,0.0020358565,0.004007979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009380065,0.0005788397,0.0009019253,0.0022069928,0.011270844,0.018240353,0.0017458934,0.009761353,0.010389481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0173225,0.0005843956,0.00066716725,0.0014822996,0.039187133,0.02194678,0.009519666,0.013252046,0.0012369144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060379716,0.00032418763,0.013708178,0.0005817827,0.000027770231,0.0007556262,0.10070727,0.00037431333,0.0001650105,0.8173304,0.01994527,0.04601982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006398404,0.00014992956,0.010259708,0.0038068295,0.00006354117,0.00060630654,0.35871682,0.000670133,0.00053467316,0.4462408,0.1787886,0.00009871726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149479145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02184162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018240353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010378975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021607459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075305045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569194418","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a827","title":"The Exclusion of Liability for Emotional Harm to Passengers in the Warsaw and Montréal Convention: moving away from Floyd, Siddhu and Pienaar, the Stott Case?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Convention; Dignity; Law; Liability; International law; Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023671782178929623,"score_gpt":0.3184187537033344,"score_spread":0.29474697152440477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569194418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15603313,0.009963819,0.0040861745,0.22919475,0.0016616012,0.00017602245,0.00021284788,0.000037101843,0.59863454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84175855,0.004000971,0.0011098783,0.070293225,0.0010601497,0.00021778607,0.000095230935,0.00004580019,0.08141842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924826,0.0018709828,0.00020169995,0.00081901316,0.0017105055,0.0029151645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965049,0.0013952308,0.00032562425,0.00027801484,0.0008540868,0.00064214953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008203162,0.00065155345,0.00060689996,0.0012356926,0.013137224,0.011709514,0.003381253,0.014270573,0.005028886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013648552,0.00066480803,0.00081182225,0.0010741788,0.021171981,0.009934336,0.006061244,0.013186389,0.0006069017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003965416,0.000031110158,0.0022121514,0.00002912157,0.00001631142,0.0007204115,0.0071442393,0.00015016778,0.00016237845,0.9585686,0.02343974,0.007486135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021601633,0.00014013727,0.02826009,0.0013796301,0.00015446548,0.0012422277,0.03584814,0.0018861596,0.0013610857,0.24958776,0.67949045,0.00043386384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7055773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7949222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7055773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023577949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029040342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5923132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797246365","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4496","title":"An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part Two","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Statutory law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislation; Common law; Commission; Law reform; History","score_opus":0.02600647097165336,"score_gpt":0.3086666323383723,"score_spread":0.28266016136671895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797246365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07370695,0.045041587,0.029858995,0.76297593,0.0015372789,0.0014088453,0.00014991488,0.00007317048,0.08524744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7178557,0.051094797,0.05651325,0.13219398,0.0017315389,0.0012519116,0.00013550684,0.00011783495,0.03910562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97226197,0.014170515,0.002364677,0.0017682107,0.0049228524,0.004511849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95429283,0.031080287,0.0038285821,0.001451899,0.00809961,0.0012466862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03572494,0.00064745627,0.000994856,0.0048690992,0.006520142,0.018046292,0.003126688,0.011089403,0.005357131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05698507,0.0011523449,0.0013978913,0.0040133246,0.015544909,0.016541451,0.0069276956,0.011259458,0.0006269502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088273075,0.00012245805,0.0028281696,0.0018320318,0.00004105584,0.0026520083,0.02626508,0.001760468,0.0030514635,0.900507,0.009578854,0.05127305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015266059,0.0002956039,0.013530443,0.008647278,0.00016012216,0.0014979491,0.07515619,0.003519038,0.0070518088,0.23639098,0.65321004,0.00038781637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043541115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044428587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043541115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023064077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06799658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18893379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798102003","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a3407","title":"The Testimonial Competence of Children: A Need for Law Reform in South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Law; Competence (human resources); Officer; Psychology; Cross-examination; Political science; Victimisation; Appeal; Criminology; Social psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.014021911687443251,"score_gpt":0.268808152428598,"score_spread":0.25478624074115475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798102003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08239667,0.15718469,0.0014242457,0.70838326,0.0014466217,0.0001834641,0.00005222886,0.000015881138,0.048912946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7793635,0.14520116,0.0036678796,0.06152664,0.0011689386,0.00019482254,0.00003525256,0.000025941355,0.0088158995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475515,0.0021570092,0.0006841602,0.00026719557,0.00090937025,0.0012271611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785373,0.014229637,0.002002249,0.00053684466,0.002036229,0.0026577374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126035735,0.00024121463,0.00070582447,0.0016355966,0.0063815746,0.009109552,0.0015143213,0.0070552616,0.0051340573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033356,0.0004858414,0.00037771225,0.001696958,0.014871024,0.008534028,0.009498526,0.0106161535,0.00025839414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005774631,0.00011012329,0.0060059293,0.00432397,0.000037934864,0.008327428,0.2014672,0.00025495028,0.0018066007,0.5496211,0.02152755,0.20645945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007172829,0.0001570112,0.019249713,0.019535402,0.00006453407,0.0061858366,0.19002491,0.00022793726,0.0011471745,0.1202165,0.64300394,0.00011533157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03027914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049738456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03027914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009166699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03628518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0666548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938864449","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4979","title":"Monkey Selfie and Authorship in Copyright Law: The Nigerian and South African Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Dismissal; Copyright Act; Selfie; Sociology; Copyright law; Political science; Intellectual property; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.010733095019712036,"score_gpt":0.2226097471595707,"score_spread":0.21187665213985865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938864449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21516232,0.13756008,0.0032765346,0.112456284,0.0009601608,0.000054890566,0.000028086928,0.000009320692,0.53049225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546086,0.03131013,0.0007052105,0.0026736641,0.00046563783,0.000028173721,0.0000038041271,0.0000062416275,0.010198623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978514,0.0012196988,0.00013143777,0.00016214867,0.00031096296,0.00032436862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968834,0.0085584195,0.00083175773,0.00020952357,0.00045988665,0.00025211138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043964335,0.00033009794,0.00030694957,0.0032589608,0.008761094,0.009779156,0.00057434884,0.0056234137,0.003078374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076244385,0.00029560152,0.00023940546,0.0020302285,0.027639184,0.013295139,0.0030041072,0.004040159,0.00019212598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008972134,0.0000122691845,0.00083650305,0.000099161,0.0000019122608,0.0008525938,0.02544342,0.000060901802,0.00009703508,0.96397936,0.00090042275,0.0077074515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020283042,0.00006448717,0.007928828,0.0044453987,0.00002957905,0.0028105178,0.134433,0.0007695837,0.00075255823,0.5401462,0.30853787,0.000061702856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008370434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013594531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009779156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054788794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039219274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039752185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946755514","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4961","title":"Beyond the Contours of Normally Acceptable Political Violence: Is Cameroon a Conflict/Transitional Society in the Offing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Global Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Transitional justice; Politics; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.007315200147739604,"score_gpt":0.2732287067696486,"score_spread":0.265913506621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946755514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70740753,0.044865973,0.0010712878,0.1434935,0.001212142,0.00009651626,0.00016100217,0.000014559414,0.10167748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98613524,0.0067601036,0.0002671416,0.0048149386,0.00011228117,0.000024229925,0.000024932495,0.000005262916,0.001855756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987686,0.0005797385,0.000032777585,0.000056855763,0.00004443545,0.0005176275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841106,0.00068126037,0.0003912819,0.00004203204,0.00013591629,0.00033840284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098486,0.0004213939,0.00024234048,0.0010338874,0.007854822,0.005348565,0.0004981331,0.0015106256,0.004440653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002634643,0.00022337887,0.00019065259,0.002045467,0.010022088,0.0060941554,0.0026526824,0.0022575604,0.00021475645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052411115,0.00014617095,0.10769721,0.0011054564,0.00004703668,0.029780868,0.37964284,0.00041061133,0.0015201395,0.34116125,0.028114215,0.10985006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021574491,0.00008467725,0.07700309,0.0019250604,0.000034611796,0.0038276382,0.7453348,0.0003853553,0.00039617563,0.024220917,0.14670222,0.00006403446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039626654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041659098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039626654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004402039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050877477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078792036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974595825","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4221","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; Nedbank","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Companies Act; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Face (sociological concept); Statute of limitations; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.015442356436548343,"score_gpt":0.2963009868218156,"score_spread":0.28085863038526726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974595825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14191933,0.003922171,0.0048586586,0.05682551,0.0010546197,0.00011861981,0.0001467196,0.000047669782,0.7911067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703369,0.0028082584,0.002728788,0.018632447,0.000840792,0.00019716675,0.000104745835,0.000044820412,0.10430609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98196304,0.00804623,0.0009519839,0.0014490266,0.0045299553,0.0030596717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987887,0.0076137823,0.0015308068,0.00049822615,0.0019770744,0.0004931252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009981407,0.00033394288,0.00048377665,0.0011502244,0.0065642707,0.011601675,0.0010662671,0.005718362,0.0036535836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017490946,0.00044135135,0.00042841976,0.00096172176,0.011131656,0.006390585,0.003989259,0.0064087533,0.00089073455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021742691,0.000030480387,0.0016066226,0.000056396035,0.0000034380157,0.0004973955,0.016776754,0.0003077503,0.00036747436,0.95817155,0.017336182,0.0048241518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032959266,0.000117197946,0.011459022,0.00092645054,0.00004369705,0.0008499812,0.032176033,0.00094061915,0.0013418389,0.07443385,0.8775529,0.00012531127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031511415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04277909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031511415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111766355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014744765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919765","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5950","title":"Deciphering Dangerousness: A Critical Analysis of Section 286A and B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Declaration; Discretion; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.00906949135286845,"score_gpt":0.29022582411866865,"score_spread":0.2811563327658002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22593632,0.0702482,0.011121744,0.2788647,0.0034966809,0.0015480807,0.0005622774,0.00009850213,0.40812337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8778622,0.02703051,0.0065036155,0.04927912,0.0012701666,0.00044580473,0.0002333454,0.00009126284,0.037283983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926544,0.0044894447,0.0005936389,0.00039416488,0.0037345607,0.0015226722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94601315,0.045418832,0.0018808781,0.00041452606,0.0057580476,0.0005146806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013566533,0.00046127112,0.00038483687,0.009915696,0.011788286,0.009029362,0.0013167929,0.0057641505,0.002139968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037911788,0.00049555604,0.000606928,0.003712507,0.017377693,0.005426632,0.0025929,0.008701635,0.00030410953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006138836,0.00004614974,0.006372179,0.0005647199,0.000021988135,0.0031138097,0.20731252,0.00035177363,0.0006722126,0.6464893,0.071050234,0.063943714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017146795,0.000110480694,0.038587485,0.006560795,0.00009500471,0.0012306754,0.3170334,0.001005861,0.002010641,0.1071901,0.52597106,0.00018735132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17158979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2785004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17158979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025063878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032116793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34118205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120840252","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a6781","title":"The Taxation of Company Distributions in Respect of Hybrid Instruments in South Africa: Lessons from Australia and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Debt; Financial instrument; Legislation; Liability; Economics; Tax avoidance; Tax law; Public economics; Business; Incentive; Finance; Tax reform; Law; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.020522217513147967,"score_gpt":0.23279146231571418,"score_spread":0.2122692448025662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120840252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65704584,0.004060757,0.0023054578,0.01221276,0.00006195137,0.000116477175,0.0001901758,0.000016399641,0.32399017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733893,0.0029678557,0.0015715712,0.0005389618,0.00000978825,0.000022414632,0.000039275586,0.000011335559,0.021449616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992466,0.00012906901,0.000027767554,0.000057758967,0.00020581234,0.0003330218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.00027580865,0.00009741812,0.00006510596,0.00044857187,0.000118124175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070416066,0.00020646284,0.00030795028,0.0009768797,0.0041833404,0.002398477,0.00062967517,0.0007375839,0.0021925005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027913635,0.0002080338,0.000363382,0.0013801339,0.0021029827,0.001275583,0.0016397694,0.0018272924,0.00010355853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001534896,0.00009150854,0.0252682,0.00019241795,0.00006074833,0.002538233,0.01681637,0.007840332,0.001269116,0.8720624,0.007928636,0.06577849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022221191,0.00020069334,0.22460686,0.0015567756,0.00045743093,0.0018734753,0.052455783,0.03955254,0.0071351235,0.18904234,0.4824323,0.00046449085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9618473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97096765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038152695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03324911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025548285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24124032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122490110","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i7.6","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Legislature; Promotion (chess); Law; Labour law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018536158317493914,"score_gpt":0.3303078449576757,"score_spread":0.3117716866401818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122490110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6685929,0.004498057,0.0065719625,0.018640662,0.00049092504,0.0001599563,0.000049612816,0.000014333351,0.3009817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985284,0.0007670277,0.00038991016,0.0011652895,0.00021926267,0.000039300947,0.000009857927,0.000008487033,0.012116898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98459756,0.004863992,0.0009922843,0.0008648726,0.004441413,0.004239914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98219,0.011697055,0.0034908652,0.000618281,0.0014790989,0.0005246395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009022198,0.0003334186,0.0005777265,0.0019856659,0.011998246,0.010001934,0.0014967361,0.007832899,0.0046450393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028686794,0.0003832165,0.0006153173,0.0017581175,0.015203727,0.0037679137,0.008476266,0.007057611,0.00047530304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011223232,0.00011708341,0.0150343515,0.00024710066,0.000024240691,0.0051261173,0.043127466,0.001215727,0.0014984347,0.9065454,0.002093093,0.024858762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105740415,0.0007271662,0.19081254,0.0029212157,0.00018195456,0.0046229917,0.2339003,0.0039225915,0.0051232935,0.34638944,0.21085897,0.00043381378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015269866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015269866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008621019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066272896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06255019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122551832","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i2a496","title":"Responsibilities of Companies towards Employees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Corporate governance; Business; Shareholder; Corporation; Corporate law; Stakeholder; Corporate social responsibility; Accountability; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Social responsibility; Limited company; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.016467992128349235,"score_gpt":0.222796727493214,"score_spread":0.20632873536486476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122551832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15382946,0.0041025667,0.01086544,0.06163556,0.0014055519,0.00024074863,0.000092230795,0.00020160434,0.7676269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8656063,0.0013947185,0.0016578353,0.014649913,0.00048324568,0.00014970917,0.000069618574,0.000046367477,0.115942284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806678,0.009496458,0.00082593964,0.0013283365,0.0043685976,0.0033128955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831297,0.0049655186,0.0019756844,0.0012630641,0.0034308783,0.0052351677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009256768,0.00042536866,0.00022715986,0.001275263,0.0053314115,0.007875838,0.0010990911,0.0025611424,0.009511181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015347958,0.0003993851,0.00029634338,0.0005496782,0.008156553,0.0032169933,0.006278929,0.002932444,0.003400209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008323677,0.00024687077,0.0301313,0.0002351449,0.000036300047,0.0015931289,0.09489396,0.00066389143,0.005299527,0.6584057,0.08162283,0.12678804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024551451,0.0001440582,0.015964566,0.0004532346,0.000016815506,0.0012126678,0.03199235,0.00046290172,0.0017545312,0.07236148,0.875524,0.00008899213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060232705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032797595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009511181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003288408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008671197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048955023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123089497","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v16i1.8","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Plaintiff; Warrant; Suspect; Cause of action; Law; Probable cause; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Political science; Reasonable doubt; Officer; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04659939553475984,"score_gpt":0.3514826152423833,"score_spread":0.30488321970762344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123089497","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042299824,0.96426135,0.00042451735,0.019194033,0.0006925698,0.000028370187,0.000024748457,0.0000048465035,0.011139615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051026564,0.9399301,0.00056279096,0.0059616435,0.000663741,0.000030435102,0.000017946268,0.0000116091915,0.0017950891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940513,0.0019842067,0.000979326,0.00034903712,0.0020641095,0.00057196873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664906,0.026405552,0.0026182903,0.00040591543,0.003396346,0.00068335544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015776467,0.0006891339,0.00082291075,0.013769627,0.003442431,0.0068829693,0.0016851496,0.004344217,0.00274565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145401,0.00090845546,0.000733482,0.014760658,0.01393355,0.006918952,0.0030758216,0.00477777,0.0005390266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008817979,0.00013303709,0.008851568,0.022916665,0.00011576753,0.0041378075,0.041608207,0.0007767948,0.0011084266,0.32531944,0.068587676,0.5263564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018951032,0.00014053917,0.02483398,0.074455984,0.00015178022,0.0035431592,0.01869874,0.00036949816,0.00061753613,0.03379893,0.84325653,0.00011435161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036379114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07177958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036379114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029637525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08343494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123763647","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i5.4","title":"Pre- and Post-Trial Equality in Criminal Justice in the Context of the Separation of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Celerion (Canada)","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Law; Prerogative; Political science; Veto; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.041904938249990774,"score_gpt":0.32934137939955277,"score_spread":0.287436441149562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123763647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27319887,0.013200384,0.01215485,0.06226854,0.00082455634,0.0000957133,0.00010301152,0.000019646408,0.6381345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98512137,0.0010249977,0.0008208267,0.0019633227,0.0004003783,0.00004416251,0.000011848513,0.00001351858,0.010599574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160355,0.0030222647,0.00023712854,0.0014180026,0.0011637553,0.0025553405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963229,0.0019068305,0.00047921875,0.00026754112,0.00043617925,0.000587414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005423447,0.00026108898,0.00064246595,0.0012834204,0.014557637,0.013471058,0.0013192752,0.0057289945,0.00678835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099876765,0.00031927938,0.0004410025,0.001458964,0.038033366,0.012856224,0.009481042,0.008673575,0.0005599999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010557849,0.000011152524,0.00016070629,0.000005309828,0.0000011799455,0.0000636173,0.0017385503,0.00006130795,0.000031213694,0.9959506,0.00033628268,0.0016294557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017841829,0.00004312075,0.0021256136,0.00008107417,0.000010310884,0.000072969015,0.0035043387,0.00050687866,0.00015877125,0.97605366,0.017400118,0.0000253179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020887654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026120158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020887654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012868349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008285252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09336686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124915855","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2506","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Law; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Common law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.048583883940547204,"score_gpt":0.3792018602225298,"score_spread":0.3306179762819826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124915855","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042749878,0.0043146005,0.54439294,0.0102560865,0.0024161434,0.0059828614,0.005463959,0.00032378008,0.3840997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32539907,0.005783207,0.53981304,0.006561743,0.00085526553,0.0123147145,0.0034510288,0.00051718927,0.10530478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781713,0.009791913,0.0024889861,0.0030267192,0.0055035404,0.0010176498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832191,0.008746978,0.0020594837,0.0018520575,0.0039237924,0.00019859256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016195485,0.00066496263,0.00085789745,0.007945572,0.0047294847,0.007589827,0.002620805,0.0026789438,0.010358336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137674,0.000589864,0.001297133,0.00986883,0.01392901,0.0049445615,0.003984847,0.0040304367,0.0029348359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027549975,0.00005587488,0.0053773,0.0005085785,0.000033608656,0.00033101471,0.017044509,0.0005604686,0.0011446859,0.9161065,0.009926054,0.048883803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032307857,0.0001568119,0.012580159,0.0015471689,0.00004180142,0.0010248735,0.015803974,0.002330312,0.0035982225,0.29563332,0.6671375,0.00011360581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013739703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013542509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135940413","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a8150","title":"State Use Provisions for Patent Law, and Expropriations: Some Comparative Law Guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remuneration; Government (linguistics); TRIPS Agreement; State (computer science); TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; Patent Act; Business; Patent infringement; Political science; Patent law; Engineering","score_opus":0.13350417912541174,"score_gpt":0.3603051737450357,"score_spread":0.22680099461962394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135940413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03381925,0.12677419,0.0202227,0.15024914,0.0021135698,0.0011989516,0.0007943434,0.00022293457,0.66460496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59504503,0.1387213,0.058511414,0.0552281,0.0027368504,0.0031205255,0.0011369593,0.0009566855,0.1445431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542064,0.0063438187,0.0015906952,0.0010840965,0.0031680474,0.0023926978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971017,0.022133831,0.0015534069,0.0011563723,0.0036123802,0.0005270315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028051723,0.0013771206,0.0015948412,0.011552882,0.014838478,0.029682614,0.004084437,0.021247689,0.012168083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047517583,0.0017752092,0.0016080353,0.012667442,0.023752563,0.03594706,0.009205233,0.017873466,0.001671452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001801032,0.00004358271,0.00022091373,0.00030063067,0.0000040669775,0.00041643353,0.0153765045,0.00023103347,0.0003474732,0.9592109,0.0079786405,0.015851788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058804035,0.00013880651,0.0038892052,0.0059101507,0.000052119456,0.0005099406,0.040761195,0.00085571565,0.0011490829,0.24392346,0.7025745,0.00017711177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1020422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11898192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1020422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033724975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039653055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24469298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158127812","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7593","title":"Orocowewin Notcimik Itatcihowin: The Atikamekw Nehirowisiw Code of Practice and the Issues Involved in Its Writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Law; Coding (social sciences); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; History; Linguistics; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016814980352450905,"score_gpt":0.3444684474139722,"score_spread":0.3276534670615213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158127812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1622766,0.01307485,0.0076869167,0.08149309,0.001369704,0.0001875751,0.00009324847,0.00006346574,0.7337546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257966,0.0041354,0.0042585656,0.006404086,0.00021016419,0.00025287666,0.0000852331,0.00012635883,0.15873066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974426,0.001006871,0.000106919775,0.00030761823,0.00064341066,0.0004926722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748033,0.0014300526,0.00029030585,0.00019258275,0.00037032762,0.00023655193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031071806,0.00027561843,0.00018946777,0.0007157503,0.011315204,0.010510329,0.00084212056,0.0030143848,0.0038425361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074404976,0.0003163292,0.00009321177,0.0017582455,0.01472557,0.0038155485,0.0025838492,0.0040889494,0.00060250255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033949673,0.000024995705,0.0015260739,0.00007342962,0.0000026404994,0.0008813958,0.11289776,0.00014542976,0.0008513457,0.8063314,0.04055838,0.036673255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009506536,0.000015219432,0.0054401546,0.00039585022,0.0000034960922,0.0004349196,0.068789944,0.00039858546,0.0007281189,0.047667183,0.87607116,0.000045937675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13689609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19429357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13689609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013131711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013476103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163756057","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7588","title":"Did I Break It? Recording Indigenous (Customary) Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Limiting; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.008005651693130172,"score_gpt":0.2614457549019123,"score_spread":0.25344010320878213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163756057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51078075,0.0059623416,0.009149466,0.08338001,0.0014978978,0.00013413226,0.00015528915,0.00020245711,0.3887377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97002,0.0012223757,0.0012035742,0.0025785202,0.00014042735,0.000028912238,0.000030551568,0.00007535095,0.024700264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917761,0.0031579726,0.0003106341,0.00074048206,0.002628381,0.0013865244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912453,0.0045783794,0.0008201078,0.0010339605,0.0017629657,0.0005592993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008656499,0.0003004198,0.00043675175,0.0015826193,0.017151097,0.010767686,0.00227999,0.0030355758,0.0037320126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023083951,0.00033815557,0.00023196316,0.002154071,0.043531127,0.007695319,0.0046777846,0.009914311,0.00048719282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013724837,0.000011961088,0.001569826,0.0000738605,0.000008210229,0.0005236567,0.79292697,0.000043167827,0.0004930671,0.18400753,0.005985628,0.014342503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054282937,0.00003076705,0.0044113733,0.0005995515,0.000021256461,0.000557824,0.71098226,0.00016360536,0.0012121921,0.015152225,0.2668054,0.00005814173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24346974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25007927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24346974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0162879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114084715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48410517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168065586","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7662","title":"Editorial: Determining the Content of Indigenous Law with Special Reference to Recording of the Law - Continental Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Diversity (politics); Political science; Cape; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022941763180475437,"score_gpt":0.2918479840411488,"score_spread":0.2689062208606734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168065586","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042158757,0.0017483137,0.0000629106,0.027664207,0.9668615,0.000021453772,0.000073941825,0.00003829614,0.003487321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007248773,0.0025004107,0.0000919054,0.011321312,0.96550834,0.000031036227,0.00006216288,0.000068593916,0.01969122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904795,0.0015051108,0.00095949427,0.00088949694,0.0055622836,0.00060409895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646224,0.0146522755,0.0018075365,0.0009316893,0.014921466,0.0030646175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007380825,0.0033275099,0.0031374448,0.0072817835,0.008085446,0.012568705,0.0033155696,0.011844668,0.024783341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034100536,0.00096261513,0.0020033314,0.0035342535,0.004459823,0.0057131564,0.0024341643,0.014609711,0.012932148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008399786,0.00000671471,0.000016390226,0.00008141301,0.00000398112,0.00004789476,0.000032690274,0.00001041102,0.000027694576,0.00028404174,0.9974305,0.0020498612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002088582,0.000013583082,0.00033345268,0.0006514394,0.000019914625,0.000106485226,0.00018399295,0.00009332261,0.000088931534,0.0011288447,0.9973424,0.000016669503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007296624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017569548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024783341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006638647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077326545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08290857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206208231","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i6a1117","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Safeguarding; Multiculturalism; Legal education; Politics","score_opus":0.009911963621447422,"score_gpt":0.3101963665386608,"score_spread":0.30028440291721337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206208231","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015025318,0.0049881404,0.00018708695,0.030922066,0.88220966,0.00007555904,0.000487027,0.00027045034,0.08070971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00227562,0.0066236253,0.00025635757,0.027926505,0.6700988,0.00007500942,0.00069584313,0.0002848336,0.29176345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972133,0.0002719064,0.00024467058,0.00051792787,0.0014808362,0.00027140227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135405,0.001277715,0.00045784732,0.0005882356,0.004738564,0.0015836147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018859459,0.0014616576,0.0012364738,0.0026946843,0.002332145,0.006837156,0.0020251917,0.004501661,0.28524715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012660299,0.0005000684,0.0011266919,0.0011231124,0.0010504579,0.0034519287,0.0018511792,0.004953873,0.18525942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010044749,0.0000069152984,0.000025251533,0.00007712826,0.000001981508,0.00004065556,0.000013370862,0.000007971758,0.000039942013,0.0003933584,0.98958194,0.009801435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005892209,0.000007468025,0.00010547097,0.0001485491,0.0000023465948,0.00006985194,0.000031495965,0.000014000064,0.000035687735,0.00028289392,0.99929285,0.0000035575308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001148675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020948877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28524715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025706799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235959392","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i2a3507","title":"Editorial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Legislation; Ecosystem services; Law; Political science; Environmental law; Presentation (obstetrics); Corporate governance; Library science; Management; Ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.005044059924247144,"score_gpt":0.2345695300680237,"score_spread":0.22952547014377656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235959392","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027978217,0.008482818,0.0003312256,0.03868461,0.6672352,0.00019216853,0.001999043,0.0005668559,0.28222823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026849618,0.0069759823,0.00040350508,0.020294484,0.15453382,0.00014957714,0.0023649812,0.0004144872,0.81217825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770665,0.00026098872,0.00016383361,0.00045378716,0.001123389,0.00029139782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448544,0.000636778,0.00021709275,0.0004821091,0.003033567,0.0011449337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017574423,0.0013376233,0.0012179666,0.0023937242,0.0025267152,0.0070645977,0.0020006276,0.0044344706,0.49208844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008569428,0.00048416946,0.0010823089,0.0013820825,0.0008795203,0.0033138697,0.0022828346,0.0045760185,0.31629226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016832524,0.0000072800103,0.000023803312,0.00007821795,0.0000016713296,0.000043069358,0.000013868706,0.000008848681,0.00004434859,0.0005476668,0.98698425,0.012230247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005168559,0.000006216156,0.000100817626,0.00010308194,0.0000012605232,0.000029983625,0.000032214703,0.0000074441014,0.000025939018,0.00024814534,0.9994373,0.0000024489934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024412794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004606622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49208844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024085087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030165983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236421334","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v13i3.63674","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); General partnership; Sine qua non; Duty; Law; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Limited partnership; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07185191166909422,"score_gpt":0.316219953803129,"score_spread":0.2443680421340348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236421334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13610972,0.004865988,0.045792505,0.38159996,0.001594054,0.00048558586,0.00012907165,0.00009264396,0.42933047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95073384,0.0008246795,0.005841962,0.030026358,0.0002376527,0.00019096168,0.000011919453,0.000029857672,0.012102765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770159,0.014432611,0.00057820807,0.0018558836,0.0041218856,0.0019955416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979354,0.017247185,0.0007367063,0.00095874176,0.0010133123,0.00069006527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029500304,0.00044044314,0.0007101128,0.0011920439,0.0070673986,0.009237305,0.0033353376,0.012021569,0.0036331979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032819137,0.00049793225,0.0008495512,0.0011162264,0.04401626,0.009795219,0.009096893,0.01122809,0.0003152553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027898102,0.0000021284484,0.000050984017,0.000008401912,0.0000012066771,0.00005098888,0.0020855847,0.00008532656,0.000024102423,0.996636,0.00051514286,0.0005373494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008082081,0.00006958398,0.00069387164,0.00041233219,0.000029266334,0.00016838207,0.0075434037,0.0027357407,0.00057477015,0.89534926,0.09226934,0.0000731762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048889678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0626924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048889678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013858232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01978139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15601438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254903354","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2697","title":"Editorial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Law; Restructuring; Exposition (narrative); Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.007535733209175946,"score_gpt":0.22852473564039613,"score_spread":0.2209890024312202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254903354","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005081414,0.0024550646,0.00011367285,0.01687132,0.9482339,0.000037225338,0.00017846996,0.000112440604,0.031947155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010876927,0.004117377,0.00020595692,0.019117983,0.75061154,0.000059286354,0.00035523335,0.00018720106,0.2242577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963343,0.00033011977,0.00033456762,0.000617639,0.0020711897,0.00031214987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883858,0.0017540551,0.0005293195,0.00076780235,0.0067283455,0.0018346839],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026553026,0.0020239863,0.0012544534,0.0031861356,0.0029835722,0.006274283,0.0021899773,0.005491446,0.13386315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565496,0.00049082394,0.0013374608,0.001369008,0.0013026983,0.0034483974,0.0016578205,0.0065563624,0.10358316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006632686,0.0000051658462,0.000013140562,0.000047693076,0.0000014030815,0.0000371495,0.000006146248,0.000008291767,0.00002810306,0.0003111961,0.99409086,0.0054441215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048851603,0.000005236021,0.000067610854,0.00009539169,0.0000023098937,0.000046552,0.000019762892,0.000018703478,0.000032366275,0.0003801196,0.99932384,0.0000031291333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015876081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004025293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86613685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023616012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030422125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380538111","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15441","title":"Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures, Biodiversity Stewardship and Statutory Intervention – A South African Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Stewardship (theology); Statutory law; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Intervention (counseling); Protected area; Environmental planning; Business; Conservation biology; Political science; Geography; Law; Politics; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.013067006512388431,"score_gpt":0.22187833045206382,"score_spread":0.2088113239396754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380538111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06752334,0.106366836,0.008549942,0.5059004,0.003331034,0.00025307247,0.0001959612,0.00003567368,0.3078439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79828864,0.07103617,0.006817248,0.066975355,0.0012706262,0.0002598703,0.00010522134,0.000056506964,0.055190306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962471,0.0016290853,0.00019055248,0.00027931537,0.0006534706,0.0010005052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593335,0.0021944074,0.0006470875,0.00017869768,0.0005612378,0.0004853418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072845346,0.00065948983,0.00038567,0.0020992155,0.0054849368,0.0061107567,0.0013125507,0.0057650357,0.012494723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007948764,0.00033645862,0.00057562994,0.0019855269,0.011961831,0.008985675,0.0068089473,0.0056492807,0.0007671729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002286119,0.000056974557,0.0020755567,0.0013527599,0.000018305964,0.001145261,0.015147644,0.00030220908,0.00086169713,0.9254132,0.011768971,0.041834626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018425377,0.00009590795,0.01025422,0.006036179,0.000040372346,0.0012586843,0.039303407,0.00060074276,0.0009925413,0.19941132,0.74192137,0.000066864064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011110047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01412503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012494723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004907715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013756656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04179901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391011554","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a14259","title":"The International Court System: A Solution to the Crisis in Investor-State Arbitration?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Investor-state dispute settlement; Arbitration; Tribunal; European union; Law; Political science; International arbitration; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Business; International trade; Foreign direct investment; International investment; Finance","score_opus":0.009465041701417244,"score_gpt":0.22988352982669918,"score_spread":0.22041848812528195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391011554","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01767072,0.00972519,0.021314885,0.6653413,0.0045765666,0.00007753689,0.0000820618,0.00021945426,0.2809922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7592587,0.008758799,0.0118133,0.11500925,0.0072213565,0.00019295029,0.0002014858,0.00037098586,0.097173154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839499,0.006532038,0.00081359927,0.0021659096,0.0037771363,0.002761456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811251,0.008608946,0.001570276,0.0018476876,0.003823351,0.0030245108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018023795,0.00051215367,0.00067801273,0.0023243786,0.0083612725,0.027570412,0.0030687558,0.015817018,0.023215126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04141961,0.00051470194,0.00075799186,0.002830533,0.017463172,0.030363057,0.010821893,0.019458639,0.0032940924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013294188,0.000019375848,0.0005290076,0.00003604899,0.000004501165,0.00014196217,0.0018995405,0.00022884882,0.00009247518,0.94761497,0.028407143,0.021012746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045764064,0.000052373325,0.0011376659,0.000469396,0.0000130141425,0.00041060394,0.007510093,0.0018685027,0.00022831942,0.5236245,0.4645827,0.0000570131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012890033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013876269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027570412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00970376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015665567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095320046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408651025","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a17049","title":"Thin Capitalisation Safe Harbour Rules: A Proposed Conceptual Legislative Design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harbour; Legislature; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.017392189782128354,"score_gpt":0.22903817283362551,"score_spread":0.21164598305149715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408651025","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037516247,0.0004721841,0.6147587,0.018079907,0.00065956387,0.0040014875,0.0003207153,0.0006282329,0.32356304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3696111,0.0004868211,0.5683795,0.005427685,0.0002268229,0.0053014494,0.00030070823,0.00014455093,0.050121292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835308,0.007819477,0.001522871,0.0024792464,0.0033090126,0.001338544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820645,0.0039941045,0.0014125187,0.0022553145,0.003346842,0.0007848172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022887649,0.00074906764,0.0006866415,0.0027021116,0.0048836814,0.015511029,0.0041602957,0.0074778264,0.008234049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015441283,0.0015859734,0.0017978777,0.0017004545,0.019274851,0.008942864,0.0042468673,0.006655939,0.0018434934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065874133,0.000024407542,0.0001830049,0.000036745176,0.0000033065487,0.00004767148,0.0013828757,0.0006059863,0.000244709,0.9939023,0.00076617644,0.002796274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018164149,0.00041767862,0.0018799464,0.0010015419,0.00011501623,0.0006557331,0.0071445997,0.013746674,0.0029131344,0.616362,0.35533065,0.00025132194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008257064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011060565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022887649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077558598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018800046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12104291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410444879","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental justice; Environmental planning; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Law","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410444879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043688085,0.009824843,0.0018044536,0.7325315,0.007723335,0.0006894065,0.00029446514,0.00011793375,0.2033259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30427969,0.0042680595,0.0019676008,0.58032167,0.0026424278,0.00090483174,0.000118343705,0.00008566966,0.10541172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920447,0.0016774185,0.00050712883,0.00076998386,0.0015422605,0.0034585146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246323,0.0039408165,0.0007613104,0.0002707635,0.0006930276,0.0018707528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076885535,0.0007672606,0.00056825735,0.00087673205,0.018050112,0.012285767,0.0030770192,0.03647717,0.005783385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064103,0.0011491331,0.0007183891,0.00091746723,0.0081754895,0.0048497617,0.007137637,0.032670897,0.00082501967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009037436,0.0002196253,0.0083402395,0.00037295587,0.00008287643,0.0068045477,0.029059565,0.00073443673,0.0024676844,0.33516622,0.5828885,0.03377298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015205615,0.00012503719,0.01843604,0.0012378115,0.00010358416,0.0012504965,0.014245094,0.00082289876,0.0013505877,0.02830462,0.9337405,0.00023133494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15920515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3437719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15920515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043413635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415300917","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set-aside; Situated; Protected area; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental justice; Marine protected area; Rural area; Biodiversity; Convention","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415300917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043688085,0.009824843,0.0018044536,0.7325315,0.007723335,0.0006894065,0.00029446514,0.00011793375,0.2033259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30427969,0.0042680595,0.0019676008,0.58032167,0.0026424278,0.00090483174,0.000118343705,0.00008566966,0.10541172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920447,0.0016774185,0.00050712883,0.00076998386,0.0015422605,0.0034585146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246323,0.0039408165,0.0007613104,0.0002707635,0.0006930276,0.0018707528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076885535,0.0007672606,0.00056825735,0.00087673205,0.018050112,0.012285767,0.0030770192,0.03647717,0.005783385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022064103,0.0011491331,0.0007183891,0.00091746723,0.0081754895,0.0048497617,0.007137637,0.032670897,0.00082501967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009037436,0.0002196253,0.0083402395,0.00037295587,0.00008287643,0.0068045477,0.029059565,0.00073443673,0.0024676844,0.33516622,0.5828885,0.03377298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015205615,0.00012503719,0.01843604,0.0012378115,0.00010358416,0.0012504965,0.014245094,0.00082289876,0.0013505877,0.02830462,0.9337405,0.00023133494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15920515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3437719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15920515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009776837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043413635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}