{"meta":{"query_hash":"ddd29141b5ec","filters":{"venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ddd29141b5ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Potchefstroom+Electronic+Law+Journal%2FPotchefstroomse+Elektroniese+Regsblad"},"results":[{"id":"W118265215","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i2a2817","title":"Deference and Diffèrance: Judicial Review and the Perfect Gift","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Judicial deference; Economic Justice; Positivism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Liberalism; Relation (database); Judicial restraint; Action (physics); Political science; Judicial activism; Politics","score_opus":0.010716278119482435,"score_gpt":0.30772149438429386,"score_spread":0.2970052162648114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118265215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09436609,0.6852048,0.0005323313,0.09011768,0.0013865902,0.003418372,0.000037287664,0.00045326483,0.12448356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85396594,0.14102462,0.00023649352,0.001228713,0.0015382284,0.00012023698,0.0000033539002,0.0000926545,0.001789736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919617,0.0016118467,0.0010867696,0.0010196085,0.0014785404,0.002841509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946739,0.0008201947,0.0014689582,0.0016814033,0.00049142627,0.00086411275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006972998,0.00081855385,0.0015446364,0.000113262206,0.01186462,0.0022491268,0.0026153657,0.00040485163,0.00024450835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031747837,0.0005951649,0.00045843335,0.00030072618,0.007589112,0.0016772373,0.00068746024,0.0032625599,0.000056604975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008447648,0.00017610396,0.0034733622,0.00042875818,0.0011152277,0.00009919647,0.023002584,0.0000054683355,0.00011893595,0.93591547,0.00316117,0.031658962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0087134205,0.00064496463,0.0015928693,0.0010216177,0.002285791,0.00060125306,0.0038977782,0.00007170264,0.0001414085,0.09121913,0.8881078,0.001702322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047029234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009512031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080113544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010659252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981031201","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2001/v4i1a2878","title":"Utilizing constitutional values in constitutional comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Constitutional law; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Public law; Mores; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03607853444442566,"score_gpt":0.3597977281514343,"score_spread":0.32371919370700863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981031201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15220737,0.031006722,0.010091903,0.016963663,0.0056300825,0.0023052427,0.00010706466,0.0009070572,0.7807809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256134,0.0012294444,0.0017503198,0.00024671163,0.0024739206,0.000085185835,0.000028028824,0.0000689168,0.0015561215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893344,0.0010911005,0.0018215325,0.0011724386,0.002527693,0.004052841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439746,0.0006097389,0.0017117164,0.0015220969,0.00072781974,0.0010311785],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053341165,0.00089307,0.0013670644,0.00044690122,0.010339539,0.002253744,0.003392465,0.0007098112,0.0007907165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025800897,0.00092245283,0.0006464323,0.0004998485,0.018153533,0.0031241586,0.00048316625,0.004135021,0.00031696536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025425002,0.0003879732,0.022203285,0.000020578284,0.0003034471,0.00019079928,0.0068534124,0.00045969646,0.00022631287,0.9653724,0.0010465431,0.0026813454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00535009,0.00042331408,0.0015946827,0.00040801568,0.00025216112,0.00033065205,0.011496974,0.0004571343,0.0009033418,0.10744515,0.86960894,0.0017295288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033946685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013064977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005105027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055515296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999535358","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2691","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sine qua non; Law; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Duty; Legislation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059355931468528064,"score_gpt":0.3419609162935602,"score_spread":0.2826049848250321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999535358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44617176,0.014928414,0.08099538,0.116098024,0.0026891723,0.01692807,0.00023407217,0.0017890955,0.320166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927049,0.00020931974,0.0022332636,0.0003200459,0.0017232724,0.000687023,0.000009925305,0.0001631212,0.0019491116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909868,0.0010225661,0.0015539175,0.0012116154,0.0020243472,0.0032007108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913086,0.0009270582,0.0027113487,0.002746574,0.001364053,0.0009423224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464276,0.00085308036,0.0011708844,0.00031706094,0.010228443,0.0018060139,0.004560439,0.0005117753,0.0000814134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043519153,0.00071601436,0.0007040726,0.0009648801,0.0021307233,0.0019188407,0.00055838306,0.003231095,0.000058562026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063545577,0.0003565574,0.008545995,0.00005505281,0.0010100459,0.000022606802,0.23515706,0.008850877,0.0019293948,0.73381704,0.00075024983,0.008869695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008546193,0.0020273519,0.006364441,0.00088734477,0.0021039546,0.00020124027,0.045264285,0.006215171,0.0025916642,0.5058038,0.41575322,0.0042413003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028565766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021319136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54653317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033186872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025760466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013299482","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i2a2498","title":"Comparative analysis of access to patented HIV/AIDS pharmaceutical medicines through the Canadian and EU TRIPS flexibilities measures: are they efficacious or overly burdensome and ineffective measures?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Access to medicines; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); TRIPS Agreement; Medicine; Business; Actuarial science; Traditional medicine; Intellectual property; Virology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11063137299792307,"score_gpt":0.3449586732713687,"score_spread":0.23432730027344562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013299482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9372034,0.035781533,0.0010051362,0.016814403,0.0004914625,0.0017401685,0.00076662295,0.00008921782,0.006108055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99186105,0.004068488,0.0001299355,0.002966789,0.0005830458,0.00011493411,0.000024923129,0.000079100166,0.00017171862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940494,0.00047517524,0.001763948,0.00088441186,0.00035000994,0.002477085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954311,0.0008967969,0.0011280484,0.00073428906,0.00033361043,0.0014761008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003323365,0.00083351694,0.0023890464,0.00093475194,0.0010707468,0.00054223783,0.0009783076,0.00034367706,0.00020311643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006668049,0.000633099,0.0005045186,0.0013209803,0.00080500083,0.0011613029,0.00026435853,0.0018298393,0.000034855286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047358423,0.0012142921,0.15038477,0.00034346108,0.034591436,0.0000545459,0.045738578,0.005519212,0.0006958708,0.7479583,0.0037124227,0.0050512906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017111452,0.003724378,0.07757349,0.00045182506,0.008494473,0.001033325,0.017504547,0.012182846,0.004178285,0.054215,0.7987113,0.00481906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017969722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14710431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017367909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046816524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014559428","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2310","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Conviction; Action (physics); Cause of action; Discretion; Political science; Reasonable doubt; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.0806131554190942,"score_gpt":0.39180385668970136,"score_spread":0.31119070127060716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014559428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000119134595,0.97844636,0.000024344701,0.0014249411,0.0001831206,0.0036594567,0.000117027776,0.000058346453,0.015967289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040353518,0.9575854,0.00042121968,0.00016689043,0.00047580662,0.00034630325,0.00003564269,0.00014944364,0.00046580145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869538,0.0038363428,0.0031856138,0.001157361,0.0021655825,0.0027012816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895905,0.0016657464,0.0051620025,0.002232065,0.00069285306,0.0006568165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011661233,0.0012174381,0.005016841,0.00039482213,0.002316387,0.0005326696,0.0031699,0.00086608814,0.00004960039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023421687,0.0008822389,0.0009406673,0.001274207,0.0037171084,0.0008528804,0.0005752609,0.0041646794,0.000008969421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021588763,0.00079120096,0.00013864163,0.047650795,0.0018184659,0.00024764676,0.042045966,0.0000035504038,0.0000017645767,0.6883862,0.0012691632,0.2174307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008149917,0.00058293564,0.000003729116,0.049831577,0.0018846699,0.0005072837,0.0031217707,0.000001801374,0.0000023728155,0.005832254,0.93670493,0.00071166235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005787913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018023394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015500536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045452965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039212520","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Legislature; Compliance (psychology); Law; Promotion (chess); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021897228404757003,"score_gpt":0.3507606884253308,"score_spread":0.3288634600205738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039212520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89349985,0.007884659,0.0005597099,0.06896668,0.001036545,0.0022703558,0.00017350698,0.000108625296,0.025500083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996313,0.0007196616,0.0003504933,0.0004281552,0.0011089002,0.00009361999,0.00001976731,0.00006960753,0.0008968291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930931,0.0011268266,0.0014349428,0.0005984654,0.0017712316,0.0019754688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942946,0.00097206223,0.0020745595,0.0017795179,0.00050310884,0.00037613843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004311779,0.000534434,0.001016345,0.00021746305,0.0036696706,0.00064282876,0.003575316,0.00023842767,0.00058907445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012448663,0.0003676156,0.00044303617,0.0006652476,0.001707644,0.0006803945,0.00054487557,0.0015374906,0.000022434398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089360034,0.0010468202,0.029826617,0.00010087128,0.00404139,0.00012638865,0.3663693,0.008790496,0.012788529,0.5473627,0.0044737915,0.024179524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005521128,0.0017499968,0.009373256,0.0016125847,0.0015936409,0.00003964433,0.09895571,0.00076073856,0.031380948,0.06619297,0.7807622,0.002057195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06749888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16312157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014952981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000816104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076502478","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i3a2353","title":"Legal Research Methodology and the Dream of Interdisciplinarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Universitetet i Oslo; Princeton University; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Premise; Multidisciplinary approach; Empiricism; Discipline; Falsifiability; Human science; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Social science; Law; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21702400558179524,"score_gpt":0.5118720691138577,"score_spread":0.2948480635320625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076502478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8297377,0.007920181,0.0128505165,0.07847571,0.001455323,0.0019392302,0.00005117147,0.00009352491,0.06747664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923389,0.00066545565,0.0010581388,0.00008346542,0.0011482058,0.00010976949,0.000005432976,0.00007303586,0.0045175944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97986406,0.008454826,0.0024951354,0.0013571855,0.004873567,0.0029552458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981835,0.007283216,0.0023069864,0.0038614601,0.004054012,0.0006593002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06763831,0.0006437685,0.0017250619,0.0007544231,0.008577077,0.0038952816,0.0065846373,0.0004328352,0.00027209608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01344273,0.00039050964,0.00075051875,0.0010151992,0.008244404,0.002616741,0.0035160917,0.0050264876,0.00009332786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00651356,0.00025772597,0.0013417439,0.0000281709,0.0006154519,0.00009037651,0.0031790717,0.000079204394,0.002810279,0.9528231,0.004711947,0.027549377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008827947,0.0030531348,0.002938354,0.00013389414,0.00018154473,0.0017499549,0.022746826,0.0023829376,0.008826859,0.8895224,0.058943342,0.000692852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014661876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018672893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1626012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008034872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016949254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084412400","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.06","title":"The liability of churches for the historical sexual assault of children by priests","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Law; Supreme court; Liability; Damages; Test (biology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Tort; Psychology","score_opus":0.012536297173417258,"score_gpt":0.2760796712263531,"score_spread":0.2635433740529358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084412400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86401874,0.07013264,0.0075535662,0.04796559,0.0016683432,0.004507195,0.00011645006,0.00031274895,0.00372473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928061,0.003245219,0.0004262652,0.00008586277,0.0012589269,0.00018861602,0.00001272584,0.00007680291,0.0018994793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918478,0.0014581531,0.0016201179,0.0006646582,0.0020297216,0.002379548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991065,0.0047308765,0.0016406542,0.00092062505,0.0012575226,0.00038527284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008844893,0.0006358954,0.0011212209,0.000059698712,0.0051621036,0.00025207238,0.0022615958,0.0004144045,0.000034599998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004415803,0.0003784542,0.000763954,0.0005897837,0.0028187681,0.0004948807,0.00023497449,0.0018480008,0.0000049203236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00303488,0.0024267505,0.0399913,0.00033880468,0.007922441,0.0000024488359,0.03663822,0.00087897346,0.025352918,0.6272091,0.081851825,0.1743523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037969083,0.002549027,0.0057877456,0.000082766855,0.0009837827,0.00003936908,0.01127956,0.00027164788,0.007704955,0.011716619,0.9546256,0.0011619844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012368339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015185434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003578119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008122436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088114035","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i2a2728","title":"Die Impak en Grondwetlikheid van die Reg om te Staak met Betrekking tot Noodsaaklike Dienste – 'n Vergelykende Studie","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Position (finance); Law; Business","score_opus":0.018726474126044543,"score_gpt":0.3248098539873243,"score_spread":0.30608337986127976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088114035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5674891,0.11020809,0.0028894434,0.028408615,0.011391711,0.0055720652,0.00041945846,0.0031213292,0.2705002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97123235,0.010510727,0.0017869596,0.00048575108,0.006693169,0.00021371472,0.000048847647,0.00051539147,0.00851311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97887313,0.0024869677,0.002784799,0.0026072413,0.004420616,0.008827223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986913,0.0012970569,0.0036693674,0.0043577403,0.001273049,0.0024897777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008624817,0.0022473931,0.0028500992,0.00063932635,0.016014755,0.0040384056,0.00756333,0.0012890352,0.000745123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038073547,0.0021534383,0.0018244493,0.00073685823,0.0033724783,0.004914431,0.0019751012,0.0069012092,0.0005659878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004174189,0.003774191,0.03141099,0.00051575684,0.016006324,0.0050615515,0.2009827,0.0008471684,0.0053431247,0.4993709,0.011594713,0.2209184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005475838,0.0017754141,0.0010780033,0.0004051751,0.0012686684,0.00019580487,0.018810477,0.000092773975,0.0024500606,0.034496997,0.93100876,0.0029420604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009384535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056371726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91941404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008707612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031452489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113237779","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i2a2479","title":"Decentralisation in Africa: A critical review of Uganda's experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Accountability; Public administration; Service delivery framework; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Local government; Constitution; Promotion (chess); Corporate governance; Political science; Central government; Service (business); Economic growth; Law; Economics; Politics; Economy; Management","score_opus":0.1103857489927654,"score_gpt":0.4148214548680573,"score_spread":0.3044357058752919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113237779","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016453441,0.9841762,0.00052991946,0.0010362748,0.0008002264,0.0016930094,0.00004682058,0.00009418857,0.011606903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042972076,0.9933471,0.00018087524,0.000125205,0.0008938555,0.00027684704,0.000070353024,0.00015865795,0.0006498643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869949,0.002088971,0.0033558896,0.0011882205,0.0027448435,0.00362715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928428,0.0008303946,0.003472313,0.001488294,0.00066336535,0.0007028449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005051659,0.0011920789,0.0042398763,0.00040583056,0.0015766723,0.0005278755,0.0026954454,0.0010530009,0.00050639454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044108895,0.001083114,0.0016202849,0.0012054734,0.0016480656,0.0017643737,0.00025010787,0.0029138967,0.000059207297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011143016,0.0007601352,0.000085474436,0.03469178,0.00052321545,0.00020292257,0.003798629,0.0000052580726,0.0000029826251,0.27152583,0.0028441206,0.6854482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000616401,0.0002250472,0.0000042097863,0.072684206,0.0008556186,0.00012031971,0.00060686254,0.0000052684118,0.000009016114,0.0030672108,0.9209281,0.0008776987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013825096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003875917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.918084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005693897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057263155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113683616","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i6.04","title":"Arbitration of family separation issues – a useful adjunct to mediation and the court process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Arbitration clause; Federal Arbitration Act; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010679055463419719,"score_gpt":0.3214630370797933,"score_spread":0.31078398161637355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113683616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8537935,0.019745648,0.025769765,0.043728832,0.0014900146,0.0040767756,0.00002580286,0.00048500928,0.050884623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943361,0.0013485259,0.0008466114,0.00076677406,0.00185807,0.00015732276,0.00001599554,0.000086628424,0.0005839269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992284,0.0018372915,0.0013201003,0.0007196945,0.0020955012,0.0017434092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957022,0.0008235175,0.001108551,0.0007142332,0.0010744452,0.00057705323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073657953,0.0005815148,0.0009982685,0.00027393887,0.0018284587,0.0005618498,0.0011185268,0.0003798003,0.000066562825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019820984,0.00044979516,0.00031456214,0.0010820118,0.0013961621,0.0012921924,0.00012150978,0.0014496336,0.00004972238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002022311,0.0002971363,0.0017846327,0.000109456356,0.0006398315,0.0000068944487,0.1280928,0.0018913532,0.0037894647,0.8522077,0.0019862866,0.007172098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011617288,0.002681618,0.0011004903,0.00033270093,0.0009344261,0.00010484787,0.033307534,0.0044038505,0.0106941005,0.1670489,0.7657827,0.0019915048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018971502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005911398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76379645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086837006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010087135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115924852","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2319","title":"The Impact on Women on the Removal of Gender as a Rating Variable in Motor-Vehicle Insurance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Yale University","keywords":"Actuarial science; Disadvantaged; Legislation; Variable (mathematics); Promotion (chess); Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01805414983900718,"score_gpt":0.3180676394324125,"score_spread":0.30001348959340535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115924852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83995664,0.003974117,0.000037830778,0.0051930905,0.0005339187,0.0010229171,0.000022489608,0.00009950859,0.14915948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369854,0.0012620711,0.00013954168,0.00028278818,0.0011520673,0.00016443315,0.0000019022517,0.00012558162,0.003173074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964465,0.0019538985,0.0013477029,0.0008181997,0.002291435,0.0039441343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922098,0.0023020892,0.0019882994,0.0024241845,0.00049734337,0.0005782979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010142472,0.0007933805,0.000978365,0.00019197218,0.008302616,0.0016382016,0.004370626,0.0004302564,0.00027329873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046301503,0.00048386172,0.00056783715,0.00068719283,0.0020445627,0.0010616452,0.00033247637,0.003999259,0.00011474681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029703465,0.00064630975,0.0040703067,0.000028452389,0.00094115606,0.00023167227,0.04038726,0.0021044493,0.0028699618,0.9354811,0.0006896267,0.009579394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010155956,0.007376498,0.011063905,0.00094492827,0.00020451337,0.00049722317,0.051947065,0.0015015942,0.0059747887,0.40813705,0.49916595,0.0030305209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072085066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024181213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52734405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004793642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002590258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131814071","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2747","title":"The Constitutional Validity of Search and Seizure Powers in South African Criminal Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitution; Criminal procedure; Law; Democracy; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Enforcement; Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.030630525159094132,"score_gpt":0.32502375730937255,"score_spread":0.2943932321502784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131814071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045983,0.01573516,0.0006707707,0.013064381,0.001095256,0.0016962442,0.00007343821,0.00018233483,0.06288412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958754,0.0017282349,0.00036277753,0.00006783577,0.00086519675,0.000050368053,0.0000050974872,0.000059420192,0.000985668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991941,0.0011173204,0.0011563632,0.00081519026,0.0020332048,0.0029369695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995603,0.0006771725,0.0010675762,0.0012247049,0.00071081164,0.0007167114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065688826,0.00060859864,0.00087072427,0.0002276769,0.007649873,0.001323738,0.0026144388,0.0004545011,0.000086197906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024526326,0.0004895623,0.00037131825,0.00043208044,0.01068799,0.0012621714,0.000466215,0.003125492,0.000019324658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089585583,0.00029372072,0.024921075,0.00010253901,0.00045286512,0.00014549201,0.07881788,0.00022572489,0.00035012187,0.88954103,0.0002865651,0.003967157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012832004,0.0031702598,0.01686675,0.0010007804,0.0011802256,0.0009230521,0.240387,0.0007657147,0.003997744,0.088108905,0.62692326,0.0038443175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002699595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015331089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8014321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017069982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004130241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142835003","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2650","title":"Restructuring of Insolvent Corporations in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Restructuring; Creditor; Business; Payment; Debt restructuring; Statute; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Debt; Political science; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.012023456429599743,"score_gpt":0.20293185715586642,"score_spread":0.1909084007262667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142835003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97715753,0.002276867,0.00027125378,0.0028445255,0.0011422044,0.0005004201,0.00001950891,0.00006514656,0.015722517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974544,0.00041465907,0.00019039676,0.00033666755,0.0012856612,0.000037048718,0.000020252262,0.0000984237,0.00016248842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948555,0.00005616274,0.0015169244,0.00067624997,0.0011099087,0.0017852066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436396,0.00009264814,0.0034972276,0.0014772875,0.00046640282,0.00010249175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010294563,0.0006445082,0.00095156085,0.00030211633,0.0014419728,0.00069816055,0.002024461,0.00018046974,0.00016009934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041311645,0.0006329858,0.00031495365,0.00044435312,0.00033431416,0.003237312,0.00044930953,0.0017540165,0.000024438594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010969829,0.00054134394,0.25565612,0.00049255235,0.0006370161,0.00081219355,0.00015746112,0.006591317,0.0056141466,0.7033402,0.0035031894,0.021557463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014382668,0.0004961173,0.35291672,0.0017790875,0.000684241,0.0007260883,0.002603617,0.0073293797,0.012033952,0.26017505,0.34251365,0.004359433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83783555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44316512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025621322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039400235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160252093","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v17i5.01","title":"Transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms and the Cartagena protocol: key issues and concerns","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; European Commission; International Fine Particle Research Institute; Global Environment Facility; Michigan State University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biosafety; Convention on Biological Diversity; Scope (computer science); International community; Genetically modified organism; Biotechnology; Convention; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Biology; Biodiversity; Law; Ecology; Geography; Politics; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02686338109358479,"score_gpt":0.2734570014326463,"score_spread":0.2465936203390615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160252093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96573615,0.0060289875,0.0003994962,0.0090000285,0.000118702876,0.01610382,0.000044752604,0.00013149914,0.00243654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949873,0.0009586184,0.0006279723,0.00026680535,0.0005406582,0.002116092,0.00001555027,0.000025577117,0.00046143238],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361914,0.00096851395,0.0011827071,0.0008260718,0.001555218,0.0018483712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971115,0.00045214195,0.00048976974,0.00037311166,0.0006591242,0.00091436337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002853241,0.00067715446,0.001001205,0.000057063084,0.00084525626,0.0005538361,0.0011026795,0.00034599172,0.00019173654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028757192,0.0002888233,0.0002536668,0.00051155704,0.0020931442,0.00035404498,0.0004232481,0.0014842295,0.000012995172],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009904135,0.0013083316,0.0040569883,0.00029109642,0.0023524875,0.00013142785,0.0070717875,0.0004132984,0.5852989,0.26715988,0.0013212404,0.12069041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.060093366,0.023149222,0.014546729,0.00045288628,0.0012058262,0.0030369784,0.018137123,0.0036247543,0.2584436,0.35646302,0.2558817,0.0049648127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017202962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021364954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3268553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031707413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043050753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162799772","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2500","title":"Mixed and Mixing Systems Worldwide: A Preface","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Thriving; International law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02539429521708089,"score_gpt":0.2957537107665136,"score_spread":0.2703594155494327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162799772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7994156,0.037729383,0.0031134954,0.02333059,0.0049876464,0.0022742709,0.000035574598,0.00093251036,0.12818094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98144364,0.007970814,0.00036737527,0.00013179911,0.0028655494,0.0000901108,0.000008898883,0.00014098929,0.006980841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920394,0.0008634533,0.0011698644,0.0010359751,0.0016140902,0.0032772627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947667,0.00034711798,0.0016525544,0.0014908264,0.00057815557,0.0011646332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047165677,0.0007958158,0.0010645277,0.0002812699,0.012063302,0.004454098,0.0018781349,0.0005459195,0.00015244339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007470655,0.00077823154,0.0004601527,0.00028428642,0.0016104295,0.0025954938,0.00039409165,0.0024106484,0.000064964086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005619698,0.00036875374,0.0066524427,0.00013099404,0.0013653716,0.00021002848,0.008102125,0.00020355705,0.002558841,0.9031989,0.0030282626,0.07361878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003073531,0.00056439365,0.0025610644,0.0003340319,0.0003889294,0.0005105421,0.0070561995,0.00046792006,0.00062015856,0.010467285,0.97272015,0.0012357931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011947053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028378015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012970415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192161463","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i3.08","title":"A Critical Appraisal of Western Cape Forum for Intellectual Disability v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2011 5 SA 87 (WCC)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Perception; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.03146304632993881,"score_gpt":0.31708016510968756,"score_spread":0.28561711877974877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192161463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91509163,0.023000622,0.013116151,0.014479953,0.0042347363,0.004109008,0.0006711034,0.00030895913,0.024987847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968108,0.00013218033,0.0014089487,0.000046096935,0.0007336195,0.00011164864,0.0000056743183,0.00012229306,0.0006287272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882712,0.0015394699,0.0024480668,0.00088482455,0.0040287804,0.0028276641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980963,0.0038503595,0.0020214557,0.0016185108,0.0018169074,0.00088312774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005859549,0.0007398842,0.0016438966,0.00012033262,0.0008113467,0.00016866687,0.002767341,0.00056792377,0.00022309106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016178558,0.0005850772,0.0012372916,0.0009400885,0.0049542864,0.0009397457,0.00063045055,0.0017667409,0.000009837804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006489551,0.0047773104,0.0538281,0.00080466975,0.0025699954,0.00001383521,0.44927043,0.0005608515,0.0033115044,0.45928308,0.008307303,0.010783369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011504406,0.008489654,0.0011502885,0.00075111893,0.0022314382,0.00013656302,0.23857073,0.0006106534,0.035865743,0.056359272,0.6415667,0.0027634054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096622313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002758669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025419656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030413105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289549478","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i7.04","title":"Introduction to Virtual Property: Lex Virtualis Ipsa Loquitur","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Digital Rights Management and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pretoria; University of Oxford; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; CLARITY; Computer science; Real property; Intellectual property; Personal property; Metaverse; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Virtual reality; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014889422810655238,"score_gpt":0.23122459652293406,"score_spread":0.2163351737122788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289549478","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116331965,0.0056181257,0.6206622,0.13922684,0.01066903,0.004843567,0.00004462856,0.0047507347,0.09785289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628705,0.00031241908,0.005656107,0.002067061,0.006342218,0.00015908742,0.000054868324,0.00021551597,0.022322217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892292,0.00062394224,0.0016547227,0.0020406344,0.002652273,0.0037992292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343735,0.00013267141,0.0007796259,0.0024674535,0.0010558837,0.002127027],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003453022,0.0012810563,0.0012474762,0.00076985423,0.0010530694,0.003005436,0.0044363253,0.00038384023,0.00011225189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005100765,0.0009495711,0.00062556786,0.0020631894,0.00033524047,0.006156629,0.0013599314,0.0024039908,0.0012210585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055671466,0.000771915,0.0000437197,0.000029003435,0.00073360995,0.00022086102,0.0022032184,0.0020045955,0.0012629268,0.79569113,0.1249216,0.07156073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027063424,0.003873077,0.000024206909,0.000058508227,0.00013152653,0.0008911223,0.0007582713,0.0023102753,0.0041377414,0.050066896,0.93353283,0.0015091958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031819782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011627101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84653854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030605784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014449805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291324282","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v18i6.06","title":"Cyberbullying: Should Schools choose between Safety and Privacy?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Anonymity; Monster; Law; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Expression (computer science); State (computer science); The Right to Privacy; Internet privacy; Right to privacy; Freedom of information; Sociology; Human rights; Public relations; The Internet; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.027093879895546673,"score_gpt":0.2606954477839584,"score_spread":0.23360156788841174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291324282","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3685662,0.02612769,0.5497272,0.027084846,0.0028063473,0.002805176,0.000046297,0.0035566916,0.019279584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97933024,0.0019192012,0.014651387,0.0005883818,0.0017602241,0.00006361616,0.000029796372,0.0002002273,0.0014569126],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894927,0.00085234165,0.0019045854,0.0017656317,0.0021285394,0.0038562063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931998,0.0003080865,0.0010924796,0.0020834343,0.0007814409,0.0025347315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004504917,0.0012978798,0.0015361096,0.00058784644,0.0016640457,0.0020027505,0.0030706816,0.0007015229,0.000039314436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006442436,0.001208645,0.0005414088,0.0014683196,0.00036108936,0.0035765707,0.001073064,0.0049148663,0.0002598697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018564108,0.0009586505,0.010318007,0.00019473334,0.0038220363,0.0009898933,0.0049478495,0.0016674373,0.005550679,0.47827083,0.009731745,0.48169172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013113381,0.0044239652,0.0020542988,0.00038182802,0.00060856633,0.007881753,0.0016782286,0.0038858585,0.016834913,0.11350955,0.8315436,0.004084047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045508548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021721482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82181185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025669718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019431374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569194418","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a827","title":"The Exclusion of Liability for Emotional Harm to Passengers in the Warsaw and Montréal Convention: moving away from Floyd, Siddhu and Pienaar, the Stott Case?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Convention; Dignity; Law; Liability; International law; Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023671782178929623,"score_gpt":0.3184187537033344,"score_spread":0.29474697152440477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569194418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90262,0.016761316,0.0010980899,0.07471571,0.00085576874,0.002043361,0.000070237555,0.00005326158,0.0017822577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994288,0.0032214643,0.00030353616,0.00043311596,0.0012047846,0.00012001336,0.000007678431,0.00004963321,0.00037171715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407953,0.0013872419,0.0010053772,0.00071594684,0.0011948787,0.0016170131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354285,0.0034128658,0.0009760483,0.0011699462,0.00047040405,0.00042789188],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020725,0.0004839749,0.00063785195,0.000080805024,0.010711709,0.0012908139,0.0015663285,0.00036783033,0.00003291675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025942996,0.00029136706,0.00036698882,0.0002073481,0.0024883747,0.0007697417,0.00033629822,0.0020206035,0.00000234371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018435883,0.0006820342,0.012225741,0.00015565136,0.0012472048,0.00025874656,0.09286919,0.00039482737,0.0016038087,0.809966,0.00287528,0.07587787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007311249,0.0018686902,0.02863666,0.0004822896,0.0007628623,0.001176334,0.110069074,0.0015529809,0.00082561624,0.22670354,0.6190529,0.001557803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023603292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2087065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6161776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069384184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084016763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797246365","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4496","title":"An Analysis of the Regulatory Environment Governing Hearsay Electronic Evidence in South Africa: Suggestions for Reform – Part Two","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Statutory law; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislation; Common law; Commission; Law reform; History","score_opus":0.02600647097165336,"score_gpt":0.3086666323383723,"score_spread":0.28266016136671895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797246365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556275,0.02265045,0.0057634194,0.0037746348,0.0010844376,0.002938277,0.00017591007,0.00034417113,0.0076411855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505687,0.00081954646,0.0007945558,0.00012888658,0.0015267164,0.00022188156,0.00002249728,0.0001389302,0.0012900903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882545,0.0018459989,0.0018945888,0.0013098188,0.0024168422,0.0042782575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407697,0.000709763,0.0017735427,0.0021301212,0.0006185891,0.00069101446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008329822,0.000813502,0.0014183021,0.00063407817,0.0027791378,0.00037165132,0.002891863,0.0004954387,0.00041849207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095481006,0.00068255095,0.0012120032,0.0031528613,0.0025674677,0.0015905693,0.00029225953,0.002441235,0.00004122569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025659343,0.0019490311,0.0333385,0.000120304314,0.0073789414,0.000028668208,0.24734311,0.019452408,0.007640084,0.67306197,0.0005839747,0.0065370733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00819467,0.0068589984,0.009923853,0.001058729,0.010036627,0.00006479696,0.062330928,0.010218207,0.008234852,0.03302807,0.8458325,0.0042177537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032467225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0446468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011852472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002949455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798102003","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a3407","title":"The Testimonial Competence of Children: A Need for Law Reform in South Africa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Law; Competence (human resources); Officer; Psychology; Cross-examination; Political science; Victimisation; Appeal; Criminology; Social psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.014021911687443251,"score_gpt":0.268808152428598,"score_spread":0.25478624074115475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798102003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87619346,0.0225116,0.0023272808,0.0040746997,0.0023849716,0.0038546398,0.00018616245,0.000449466,0.088017724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953975,0.00020831803,0.00075931486,0.0002665541,0.0020831455,0.00024812255,0.000025113917,0.00020396075,0.00080797076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156976,0.00046869888,0.0020689408,0.0011080977,0.0009366406,0.003847874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951019,0.0007321176,0.0013567809,0.0016621547,0.00066953007,0.0004774813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026007507,0.00096046703,0.0012645663,0.0003244386,0.0018259255,0.0003047947,0.0020745627,0.00050415634,0.00023398252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017853781,0.0007189254,0.0008259416,0.0010619503,0.0020025882,0.00050237327,0.0002182505,0.002443999,0.00013981153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056672273,0.0012126745,0.003439106,0.00004641839,0.0023235797,0.000050293245,0.015475837,0.000059894945,0.0017091498,0.956884,0.0011222108,0.012009611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0980009,0.044386007,0.033365756,0.00195636,0.0033883576,0.0072698053,0.044983685,0.0016913586,0.04149473,0.21407011,0.49957228,0.009820652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015558677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01285025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7428139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015270736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068281236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938864449","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4979","title":"Monkey Selfie and Authorship in Copyright Law: The Nigerian and South African Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Research Foundation","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Dismissal; Copyright Act; Selfie; Sociology; Copyright law; Political science; Intellectual property; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.010733095019712036,"score_gpt":0.2226097471595707,"score_spread":0.21187665213985865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938864449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78589725,0.049877293,0.057024565,0.039308436,0.0016021567,0.0028642358,0.000028147511,0.0011826206,0.06221531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936068,0.0016362945,0.0017956573,0.000923513,0.0010561828,0.000063652195,0.00000277535,0.0001105321,0.00080460834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214554,0.0011224488,0.0011508648,0.001590751,0.0010178444,0.002972548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961579,0.00049510354,0.0005845403,0.0014487038,0.0005125928,0.0008011893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029875336,0.00097220636,0.0010183633,0.0003412674,0.002338006,0.0017628081,0.0023470258,0.00043020782,0.00012917459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000336647,0.0006678402,0.0002895671,0.0011118317,0.0030112157,0.001993085,0.0007699847,0.002956461,0.00005824059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055365724,0.00035167683,0.00069004984,0.000048139478,0.00060926826,0.00008326408,0.07375739,0.000022095852,0.002248973,0.9105126,0.0015011154,0.009621753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012974539,0.013227274,0.0023231586,0.00064680615,0.00059080735,0.008165908,0.04601619,0.036458153,0.023360768,0.5243553,0.3255699,0.0063111917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010512902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006485108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3861573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010424193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007129195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946755514","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4961","title":"Beyond the Contours of Normally Acceptable Political Violence: Is Cameroon a Conflict/Transitional Society in the Offing?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Global Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Transitional justice; Politics; Political science; Political violence; Political economy; Criminology; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.007315200147739604,"score_gpt":0.2732287067696486,"score_spread":0.265913506621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946755514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.847949,0.004944055,0.000387799,0.03853291,0.0006906729,0.0017272108,0.00014423757,0.00011104672,0.105513066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995566,0.001428284,0.00015114657,0.0066423425,0.00095359964,0.000053089116,0.000023019125,0.000058269125,0.00073460647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905274,0.0013125094,0.0012947537,0.00063302834,0.0023436532,0.0038886443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644333,0.0010631649,0.0005882449,0.000733959,0.0006430264,0.0005282889],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004657314,0.00060767005,0.0009332336,0.00010218214,0.0016764381,0.00044561582,0.0022237787,0.0005559974,0.0005998325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002283472,0.00042147352,0.0010744005,0.0009687627,0.0021849475,0.00079878327,0.00014606294,0.0031304308,0.00007113395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015368316,0.00030487592,0.002459431,0.000036134257,0.00029755305,0.000011523172,0.010722841,0.00013828164,0.00023314706,0.98351705,0.0012978398,0.0008276624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007927256,0.0018099862,0.007261843,0.0004961938,0.0008194289,0.0004274178,0.23494078,0.001892564,0.00071549224,0.5319843,0.20949939,0.002225299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014195998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010028856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4515327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017978662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025746967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974595825","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4221","title":"Director's Duty to Act for a Proper Purpose in the Context of Distribution under the Companies Act 71 of 2008","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center; Nedbank","keywords":"Duty; Statute; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Companies Act; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Face (sociological concept); Statute of limitations; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Corporate law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.015442356436548343,"score_gpt":0.2963009868218156,"score_spread":0.28085863038526726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974595825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592535,0.010212268,0.0013947204,0.015318476,0.0008806846,0.00572725,0.00019487082,0.000117507065,0.006900738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971567,0.0005111523,0.00019108813,0.00040133714,0.0005893933,0.00025940206,0.00003685176,0.00008688017,0.00076719775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918596,0.0016652594,0.0015368651,0.0006902875,0.0018457932,0.002402178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472314,0.0017035308,0.0011752931,0.0011952001,0.0008847597,0.00031805932],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006126984,0.00063627254,0.001229341,0.0001938796,0.0010380617,0.00031194216,0.002706948,0.00035956863,0.00015985384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008378049,0.00040392025,0.0007273144,0.0014871499,0.0011734932,0.00077018683,0.0002064829,0.0017896342,0.00004575554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004579116,0.0021775456,0.014813558,0.00035444455,0.0018260862,0.00002182308,0.18300503,0.0029303285,0.008727363,0.757854,0.008711777,0.014998951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004798394,0.002933145,0.002876647,0.00038770906,0.00045629623,0.00007549697,0.08854001,0.00022734843,0.008797582,0.010659343,0.87910426,0.0011437604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048573534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020178305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8703925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018497986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016445953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980919765","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a5950","title":"Deciphering Dangerousness: A Critical Analysis of Section 286A and B of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Declaration; Discretion; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.00906949135286845,"score_gpt":0.29022582411866865,"score_spread":0.2811563327658002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980919765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983764,0.0068252254,0.00049068226,0.00087320304,0.0005505738,0.0006532131,0.000032610234,0.00005940095,0.006751072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997818,0.00062187307,0.00059219927,0.000042893073,0.00039918997,0.000023486631,0.0000044519193,0.00007000286,0.00042791062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993423,0.0008995115,0.0015266798,0.0006736128,0.0018594582,0.0016177634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540263,0.00085784006,0.0014905952,0.00093544956,0.0009530452,0.00036044428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026515687,0.0005213202,0.0015135029,0.0004537185,0.0006951287,0.00013486108,0.001317996,0.0004655063,0.00029143266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012686584,0.00042093144,0.0009159397,0.0026804162,0.0018120296,0.0008183386,0.00029549553,0.0016718449,0.000003804551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002912657,0.0022359276,0.24378756,0.0022837797,0.015360955,0.00003530565,0.215504,0.0061647515,0.086642176,0.41425,0.00035906013,0.010463838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021492774,0.014595007,0.10155351,0.0056416593,0.0664668,0.00095173955,0.31661278,0.009699124,0.19646639,0.054662883,0.20260711,0.009250209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032058097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090102125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3595871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008933714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014194261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120840252","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a6781","title":"The Taxation of Company Distributions in Respect of Hybrid Instruments in South Africa: Lessons from Australia and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Debt; Financial instrument; Legislation; Liability; Economics; Tax avoidance; Tax law; Public economics; Business; Incentive; Finance; Tax reform; Law; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.020522217513147967,"score_gpt":0.23279146231571418,"score_spread":0.2122692448025662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120840252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99426514,0.001986683,0.00021197296,0.0023858591,0.0002272375,0.0002609952,0.00008491602,0.00002031563,0.00055687455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.00027912273,0.00009213254,0.00005168945,0.00022159338,0.000023439246,0.00009802536,0.000035064477,0.00014944695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963102,0.00016259974,0.0013086546,0.0004786991,0.0007029888,0.0010368967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966192,0.00021738542,0.0021650183,0.0004923958,0.0004402834,0.00006567457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009078994,0.00038424376,0.0006804801,0.00021070286,0.00040048125,0.0002484121,0.0005011933,0.0000895345,0.00007580345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000526941,0.0003371064,0.0001466021,0.0009755891,0.0002720112,0.0007247069,0.00020818983,0.0010757468,0.0000042783213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001487124,0.0011954247,0.3926777,0.0003607168,0.0009633091,0.00040311346,0.0011553961,0.0029490783,0.0346669,0.55198884,0.0020817702,0.01007063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021674333,0.0003730103,0.5521817,0.0019974879,0.0008181644,0.00027784926,0.019407367,0.007929683,0.0730745,0.15563186,0.16338682,0.003247238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21069872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84565425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6349555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089714624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011389543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122490110","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i7.6","title":"Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Appeal; Enforcement; Unfair dismissal; Collective bargaining; Compliance (psychology); Legislature; Promotion (chess); Law; Labour law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.018536158317493914,"score_gpt":0.3303078449576757,"score_spread":0.3117716866401818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122490110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9280679,0.019684989,0.000760048,0.032093383,0.0010762546,0.002135193,0.00013638646,0.00012535644,0.015920483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597675,0.00063602196,0.00043911336,0.000593847,0.0015598624,0.00010513351,0.00002778984,0.00007388384,0.0005876212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214,0.0015677038,0.0014939326,0.00046160945,0.0017941727,0.0025425954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556214,0.0012888558,0.0012677896,0.00097483705,0.0004048943,0.0005014969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050926222,0.0005362159,0.0009558798,0.00026567763,0.0014533473,0.00021870139,0.0018771669,0.00023675659,0.0008202708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069421943,0.00036610482,0.00041934632,0.0015714827,0.0010195621,0.000686588,0.00034056,0.0015082125,0.00003083518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005271616,0.0011973664,0.03229121,0.000073399235,0.0027695484,0.00002705482,0.4848523,0.0060848636,0.010237754,0.44674706,0.0038478922,0.0113443555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030850277,0.001070269,0.0043309657,0.0008090346,0.0012774125,0.000038002396,0.124590605,0.00027996732,0.02614086,0.01974961,0.81711924,0.0015089803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032600034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05373505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81327134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018163192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006156858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122551832","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i2a496","title":"Responsibilities of Companies towards Employees","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Corporate governance; Business; Shareholder; Corporation; Corporate law; Stakeholder; Corporate social responsibility; Accountability; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Social responsibility; Limited company; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.016467992128349235,"score_gpt":0.222796727493214,"score_spread":0.20632873536486476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122551832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722625,0.0027992094,0.0013050506,0.0038677629,0.00082248065,0.0006013303,0.00002587385,0.0005238349,0.017791977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925091,0.00045120093,0.00030834752,0.00040145838,0.0030484067,0.000047927395,0.00001938878,0.00020436462,0.0030097743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930077,0.00017105078,0.0018671475,0.00097500806,0.0014507362,0.0025283515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952685,0.00033362335,0.0017217355,0.0013010547,0.0012138012,0.00016124645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001901075,0.0010235142,0.001449465,0.0007537033,0.0010557844,0.000632635,0.0016363186,0.000342883,0.0013903747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020805874,0.0006881968,0.0008539114,0.00078077917,0.0011431124,0.0034483275,0.000464394,0.0011080944,0.0003568518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013742831,0.00047884506,0.0018655582,0.00019967217,0.000687048,0.00007479114,0.00023112509,0.000048354508,0.010091141,0.97121954,0.0025836953,0.011145936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005811202,0.0009252874,0.0024914427,0.00061194337,0.0005783433,0.0003235451,0.0010756582,0.00008875112,0.011978534,0.68986577,0.28445745,0.0017920873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051644775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28187376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008795845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007562158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123089497","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v16i1.8","title":"Reasonable and Probable Cause in the Law of Malicious Prosecution: A Review of South African and Commonwealth Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Plaintiff; Warrant; Suspect; Cause of action; Law; Probable cause; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Political science; Reasonable doubt; Officer; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04659939553475984,"score_gpt":0.3514826152423833,"score_spread":0.30488321970762344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123089497","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022431198,0.98263025,0.00003241189,0.0013442197,0.0001549421,0.0046467716,0.000088467576,0.000067798144,0.010810835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028296314,0.9691847,0.00067916117,0.00023147352,0.00041944193,0.0005668546,0.000037567235,0.00015976152,0.00042470449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862358,0.004276636,0.003391328,0.001134273,0.0021786483,0.0027833174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911105,0.0019214501,0.0038755431,0.0016310593,0.000763654,0.000697818],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009112789,0.00124858,0.0047174147,0.00042182498,0.0013801453,0.0004087908,0.0023876133,0.0008605707,0.000102659506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001516382,0.0008856377,0.0008621345,0.002198881,0.0029627436,0.00083454384,0.00049216405,0.00412277,0.000016443208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014063805,0.00084727333,0.00010356791,0.047672726,0.0017145489,0.00013617905,0.04411669,0.0000048952443,0.0000035694713,0.73153126,0.0021123344,0.17161629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077113294,0.0006411368,0.0000024217727,0.04023822,0.0017423446,0.00047352308,0.005005453,0.0000027292444,0.0000037409623,0.006294195,0.9440736,0.0007514833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006781776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010804214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016436281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037047032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123763647","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v14i5.4","title":"Pre- and Post-Trial Equality in Criminal Justice in the Context of the Separation of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Celerion (Canada)","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Law; Prerogative; Political science; Veto; Constitution; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Criminal code; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.041904938249990774,"score_gpt":0.32934137939955277,"score_spread":0.287436441149562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123763647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857672,0.0017741941,0.00025451198,0.0009275854,0.00039220872,0.0011966676,0.000017136827,0.000021646008,0.009648866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978676,0.0012623466,0.00012510922,0.00024417762,0.00030926164,0.00003648748,0.0000056395384,0.00003006876,0.00011929524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347013,0.0027075002,0.0012730923,0.00042774036,0.0010365946,0.0010849553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973384,0.0005058706,0.0010424256,0.0006102401,0.0003639322,0.00013909422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00659313,0.00033670233,0.0005456443,0.00021187229,0.00065679627,0.000102377875,0.0011703706,0.00023181786,0.00004673582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010643792,0.00023635432,0.00024167544,0.0007515056,0.0010591714,0.00086919224,0.00014557723,0.0016898668,0.00000355479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033069517,0.0019409992,0.003676429,0.00061794743,0.00030019545,0.00004643148,0.30950108,0.000077758494,0.009418939,0.6194301,0.000144181,0.02177638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036219425,0.009032063,0.032510426,0.0008593573,0.0032183586,0.0004212535,0.8728293,0.00016493272,0.013789776,0.014179926,0.015258316,0.0015168458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016974006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05968546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054110034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095757004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98957205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124915855","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2506","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Law; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Common law; Statutory law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.048583883940547204,"score_gpt":0.3792018602225298,"score_spread":0.3306179762819826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124915855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35609108,0.056862205,0.014324339,0.20911907,0.015137454,0.006286504,0.00013231166,0.0021948346,0.3398522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98353463,0.0018655637,0.0021567626,0.00081600435,0.0038441902,0.00017788108,0.000007809636,0.0002063595,0.0073908195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717,0.002962715,0.0014221274,0.001218537,0.0021346442,0.005092023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909256,0.0023691866,0.0011814968,0.0031411217,0.00080002967,0.0015825459],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010518268,0.0009702046,0.0012809559,0.00026011156,0.017358592,0.0037998664,0.005925577,0.00073946593,0.00028153253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067486474,0.00074311986,0.0008163023,0.00053976785,0.0028488163,0.0016777673,0.0010298967,0.00417411,0.0005082087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002683494,0.0005419039,0.01100763,0.00005759969,0.0032012325,0.00076432107,0.12929493,0.0002681072,0.002782351,0.7251333,0.03185318,0.09241197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016022132,0.0007020491,0.00037116723,0.00010407905,0.00025397688,0.0002183852,0.006115129,0.000032839063,0.001025025,0.035338487,0.95328665,0.0009499781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064988583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07652024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027353729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021307413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135940413","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a8150","title":"State Use Provisions for Patent Law, and Expropriations: Some Comparative Law Guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 Crisis and Beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remuneration; Government (linguistics); TRIPS Agreement; State (computer science); TRIPS architecture; Intellectual property; Patent Act; Business; Patent infringement; Political science; Patent law; Engineering","score_opus":0.13350417912541174,"score_gpt":0.3603051737450357,"score_spread":0.22680099461962394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135940413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31332684,0.11379678,0.05668029,0.47874868,0.0018512565,0.025703838,0.003397745,0.0022917413,0.004202841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97880715,0.0015901818,0.006751205,0.009583154,0.0016485713,0.0008563902,0.000035949608,0.00015402393,0.00057334686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235916,0.0008636491,0.0015748426,0.0012748863,0.0012099117,0.0027175737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933969,0.0017099379,0.0011054752,0.000653073,0.0014045349,0.0017300958],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771858,0.0008639903,0.0011727567,0.00013826764,0.0073872865,0.0018633364,0.00109029,0.000340965,0.00003445095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022939849,0.0006742963,0.0005054425,0.00057228864,0.0017683114,0.0021386303,0.00036675105,0.0014245453,0.000009315444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015730021,0.0001815731,0.00016471064,0.00023498274,0.0010810057,0.000019397869,0.25543872,0.0011756619,0.00079212704,0.73057467,0.008495977,0.00026817055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049212626,0.0011795817,0.000009462472,0.00004186036,0.0005461453,0.000044978635,0.04796996,0.0008054093,0.00080764387,0.09405118,0.84859043,0.0010321067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017850765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059499196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84009445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013365238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001319745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158127812","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7593","title":"Orocowewin Notcimik Itatcihowin: The Atikamekw Nehirowisiw Code of Practice and the Issues Involved in Its Writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Law; Coding (social sciences); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; History; Linguistics; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016814980352450905,"score_gpt":0.3444684474139722,"score_spread":0.3276534670615213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158127812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86522156,0.05433543,0.000109580826,0.058926847,0.0012729104,0.004947344,0.000029736737,0.00012848825,0.015028096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97809905,0.014747598,0.00030716587,0.003156198,0.0011692991,0.0004187379,0.000013189364,0.00016806304,0.0019207156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98642915,0.0041160784,0.002754106,0.00089268415,0.0011025597,0.0047054444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877205,0.0068018213,0.0023540216,0.0012023284,0.0016386872,0.000282627],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012999272,0.0008612179,0.0018966043,0.00025059842,0.0052109812,0.00013534066,0.0014649867,0.0006185147,0.00036999685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026805075,0.00053436495,0.0004567977,0.0008701503,0.0008877063,0.00096330955,0.00090994616,0.00670884,0.00021479512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010340111,0.0013647606,0.07963303,0.0016110732,0.0054308167,0.00018471915,0.24082446,0.0023064704,0.003305834,0.6391213,0.009343354,0.006534093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032169566,0.0032027683,0.0064156116,0.0011940206,0.0011793441,0.00061861414,0.5319829,0.002173451,0.0008253798,0.017887589,0.40042874,0.0019220097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066939895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06791985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6212337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019380066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017922561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163756057","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7588","title":"Did I Break It? Recording Indigenous (Customary) Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Limiting; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.008005651693130172,"score_gpt":0.2614457549019123,"score_spread":0.25344010320878213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163756057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41803566,0.020353578,0.0004794184,0.024387486,0.005138009,0.0034496533,0.0000613631,0.001689617,0.5264052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633025,0.008738781,0.00073738565,0.0030087316,0.0034777713,0.00011250142,0.000056028002,0.00028207814,0.020284219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867189,0.0014261425,0.0017578738,0.001542902,0.0027205579,0.0058336095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943979,0.0005460244,0.0013495819,0.0014688428,0.00083926186,0.0013983814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004760055,0.0012752892,0.0015952872,0.00011882582,0.005984151,0.0014218418,0.0027896361,0.0013228935,0.0027641687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023022137,0.001201818,0.0014944533,0.0014690398,0.0014284168,0.0027057484,0.00035394615,0.00525981,0.0013119313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057242805,0.0007996607,0.00217864,0.00014232328,0.0020430586,0.00018897308,0.032494985,0.00038002533,0.0035139425,0.9241894,0.02275912,0.010737473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027620296,0.00086630863,0.000057800273,0.0002331274,0.0003368768,0.00049995776,0.020087617,0.000033872628,0.0013373333,0.03868978,0.9334526,0.0016426876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008831026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030638814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91069347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005282309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026255432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168065586","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7662","title":"Editorial: Determining the Content of Indigenous Law with Special Reference to Recording of the Law - Continental Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Diversity (politics); Political science; Cape; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022941763180475437,"score_gpt":0.2918479840411488,"score_spread":0.2689062208606734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168065586","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012443649,0.003739997,0.00005780975,0.0011803037,0.9205173,0.0042900816,0.0004406771,0.0001591448,0.057170987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3472664,0.00061203033,0.00019923203,0.00014554334,0.64924127,0.000121998295,0.00005369054,0.00027280915,0.0020870368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821264,0.0025237533,0.003085457,0.0014746276,0.0068451352,0.003944632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850558,0.0030302426,0.0052945963,0.0024733676,0.0034161161,0.0007298819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064600674,0.0016177732,0.003078676,0.00024880466,0.003270398,0.0008346399,0.0066465153,0.002014665,0.00016368566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021950188,0.0010381629,0.0012791748,0.0013374713,0.0035710295,0.0010108931,0.0009736196,0.008934225,0.00006522428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003267325,0.0008027398,0.00068615226,0.0003927123,0.0028769225,0.00002750314,0.058912136,0.0001809682,0.0008774424,0.1636023,0.76645845,0.001915353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026754956,0.0020314008,0.000014998642,0.0009988343,0.0008678752,0.00001553746,0.0053170323,0.0000012389457,0.0010203373,0.0011763275,0.9847689,0.0011120118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025978187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11330174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33482277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046794815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067288787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206208231","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i6a1117","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Safeguarding; Multiculturalism; Legal education; Politics","score_opus":0.009911963621447422,"score_gpt":0.3101963665386608,"score_spread":0.30028440291721337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206208231","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042259468,0.03353723,0.00017301795,0.0016025034,0.85895956,0.0013684554,0.00029862998,0.0011923589,0.10282599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008087146,0.009559618,0.00060347543,0.00012864497,0.95757663,0.00026032078,0.0005515571,0.0009181384,0.022314453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655618,0.0039083315,0.003387099,0.0027985002,0.014833058,0.009511175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97946846,0.0028815616,0.0036537948,0.0029780115,0.0071413377,0.0038768523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015746338,0.0029539126,0.0037728064,0.00090282405,0.0053771464,0.0035820953,0.0072284313,0.007914745,0.000985266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012723702,0.0029997183,0.0020750803,0.0020569349,0.0032102687,0.0027751648,0.0010075395,0.023240505,0.001727175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007399681,0.00037155004,0.000006093621,0.00008828688,0.001373903,0.00015824795,0.011978156,0.00005502282,0.000019276362,0.023377454,0.9601754,0.0016566543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038844822,0.0012735159,1.435054e-7,0.00033456515,0.0011028121,0.00004079392,0.0037992918,0.00000814746,0.000037222497,0.026368227,0.96037084,0.0027799457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117732305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0266603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0986171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02256025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03351862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235959392","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i2a3507","title":"Editorial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Legislation; Ecosystem services; Law; Political science; Environmental law; Presentation (obstetrics); Corporate governance; Library science; Management; Ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.005044059924247144,"score_gpt":0.2345695300680237,"score_spread":0.22952547014377656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235959392","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023299895,0.0019890915,0.00037051138,0.0019083028,0.93685985,0.0011292088,0.0001231945,0.00039142987,0.056995388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032016872,0.0065368954,0.0005223446,0.00049451564,0.96038216,0.00025131908,0.0005607848,0.00056109496,0.027489189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98433024,0.00068187143,0.0021195617,0.0024023145,0.006008035,0.0044579585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912012,0.000593852,0.0032836818,0.0034840454,0.00020897016,0.0012282297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036621965,0.0022615094,0.002046924,0.00025590643,0.0037021702,0.0018647017,0.005026295,0.0026984739,0.004821247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011523943,0.0021983625,0.0013706045,0.00035370738,0.0016459896,0.0021377336,0.0022623073,0.010168455,0.003872559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038820255,0.00034817812,0.0000518253,0.00006549078,0.00078165455,0.000099865734,0.00012020366,0.00023396614,0.00028810208,0.0009817677,0.9924174,0.004223351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003304708,0.0009743535,0.000019492816,0.0001820337,0.00070004724,0.0000802869,0.0001336493,0.000046861147,0.00019671579,0.0054047424,0.98689735,0.0020597847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003712141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014286462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029506197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009078869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010589449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236421334","doi":"10.4314/pelj.v13i3.63674","title":"Rethinking Volks V Robinson: The Implications of Applying a \"Contextaulised Choice Model\" to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); General partnership; Sine qua non; Duty; Law; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Limited partnership; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07185191166909422,"score_gpt":0.316219953803129,"score_spread":0.2443680421340348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236421334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38092923,0.017550752,0.13024482,0.028890794,0.0020749134,0.017079439,0.00018450475,0.0023696173,0.42067593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171096,0.0001751063,0.004446177,0.00037669728,0.0010841335,0.000767792,0.000010236621,0.00017148745,0.0012574065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075043,0.0012937817,0.0016992912,0.0011758402,0.0018508928,0.0032297652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935529,0.0008373845,0.0017203015,0.0016086642,0.0013195735,0.0009611617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048917094,0.0008614262,0.0011107863,0.0004166659,0.0036971655,0.0004974802,0.0028536618,0.00050690473,0.00017622592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019542868,0.0007205897,0.00067964115,0.0023002948,0.0014981859,0.0013465728,0.00034742258,0.0031000695,0.000069349924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000571924,0.00036351883,0.0040117884,0.000035329125,0.0007168947,0.000014956558,0.40059415,0.002774977,0.0010234212,0.58563757,0.00038007702,0.0038753937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007304677,0.0030256037,0.0035242024,0.0007073255,0.002374907,0.00025696462,0.09223674,0.0037305446,0.0043712547,0.6410356,0.23696396,0.0044681733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027415017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014351712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031557928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023922373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254903354","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i3a2697","title":"Editorial","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Law; Restructuring; Exposition (narrative); Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.007535733209175946,"score_gpt":0.22852473564039613,"score_spread":0.2209890024312202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254903354","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021766218,0.010562342,0.0002059395,0.0012755767,0.9450172,0.00093847804,0.00016082676,0.0007068582,0.040915124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014729913,0.0042630434,0.000099202705,0.0003625856,0.9730227,0.00019714369,0.00080950354,0.0008222432,0.0056936643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829015,0.00017982899,0.0027583935,0.002575868,0.0059708906,0.0056135124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836098,0.0006943969,0.0083651105,0.00373224,0.003285676,0.00031276216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004261399,0.0029734294,0.0031839989,0.00079147075,0.0047149025,0.007173519,0.006572056,0.0039186473,0.00055786106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037048114,0.0028628933,0.0021117209,0.00075555005,0.0010199785,0.006943236,0.0014337325,0.015219298,0.0018812137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009603808,0.00035423346,0.00003569825,0.0004196273,0.0010311706,0.00023205398,0.000029168026,0.00006119436,0.000107304186,0.02510629,0.9680355,0.0036273717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041173166,0.00033480593,0.000008761254,0.00076399953,0.0011708468,0.00008283366,0.00008415602,0.000088373956,0.00005615083,0.03717847,0.95338434,0.0027299677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006532616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01427592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035221457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033611152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057842233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380538111","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15441","title":"Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures, Biodiversity Stewardship and Statutory Intervention – A South African Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Stewardship (theology); Statutory law; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Intervention (counseling); Protected area; Environmental planning; Business; Conservation biology; Political science; Geography; Law; Politics; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.013067006512388431,"score_gpt":0.22187833045206382,"score_spread":0.2088113239396754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380538111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97077066,0.001123006,0.008041713,0.010374887,0.00033687212,0.0021067413,0.000097361706,0.0007001357,0.0064486302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660605,0.00021659491,0.00030672763,0.0016721986,0.00009118995,0.00015085572,0.00005585176,0.00007566639,0.0008248593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472964,0.00075252785,0.00069962186,0.0010339356,0.0012162941,0.001568003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796075,0.00022448735,0.0006590175,0.0005913559,0.0000923031,0.0004720935],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023572878,0.0006674099,0.0005699725,0.0003105181,0.0011118626,0.00029650636,0.00056048785,0.00023285048,0.000691039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001905792,0.0006513373,0.0003869314,0.0009328338,0.0008322988,0.0008450139,0.000415123,0.0011923222,0.00049603835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013047081,0.0055653173,0.54210144,0.0007214065,0.008873819,0.0010308383,0.032271683,0.03239158,0.040098082,0.09600683,0.12398239,0.1039095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024415435,0.006733571,0.20332238,0.00045933854,0.0017919708,0.00031388918,0.052211136,0.01121357,0.009455028,0.030461494,0.65467834,0.004943864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005040847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008057079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5306959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004322131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011909769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391011554","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a14259","title":"The International Court System: A Solution to the Crisis in Investor-State Arbitration?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Investor-state dispute settlement; Arbitration; Tribunal; European union; Law; Political science; International arbitration; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Business; International trade; Foreign direct investment; International investment; Finance","score_opus":0.009465041701417244,"score_gpt":0.22988352982669918,"score_spread":0.22041848812528195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391011554","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11813127,0.0150735555,0.018576303,0.57911134,0.017920291,0.0042828065,0.00005260942,0.0019554195,0.24489643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978458,0.00038093005,0.00013198759,0.014850817,0.0045101885,0.00028813008,0.000049150076,0.00011536802,0.0012154416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947045,0.00013815983,0.0013124642,0.0007406939,0.0015445389,0.0015596586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980202,0.00022796182,0.0004655211,0.0006124314,0.00056675187,0.00010718191],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034574948,0.0005948584,0.0004014834,0.00054978026,0.0016590095,0.004662536,0.0017736192,0.00015105637,0.0001275993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020346383,0.00038923198,0.0004129615,0.0012027313,0.0002083082,0.0026672408,0.00028973102,0.0018900282,0.0010206944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002190516,0.00008838499,0.000096673975,0.000056121684,0.00040203688,0.00007411053,0.00027901042,0.0015059356,0.0008753483,0.93860495,0.056503095,0.0012953015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008015837,0.00009742859,0.00014130643,0.00022328248,0.00011841267,0.00031730602,0.0016064537,0.037339576,0.00039293256,0.029963829,0.9284863,0.0005116299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019522944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019452233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9086411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027108053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005745592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408651025","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a17049","title":"Thin Capitalisation Safe Harbour Rules: A Proposed Conceptual Legislative Design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harbour; Legislature; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.017392189782128354,"score_gpt":0.22903817283362551,"score_spread":0.21164598305149715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408651025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40812218,0.016129304,0.30157876,0.030077968,0.0049183653,0.006867845,0.000055039727,0.0028473604,0.22940318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870033,0.00033598108,0.0015241881,0.003077513,0.0023000746,0.00012979632,0.00010717414,0.0001605802,0.0053613945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99308,0.0003507946,0.0016828509,0.0011836063,0.0012402044,0.0024625328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953134,0.00030633106,0.0021018207,0.0009445899,0.001185208,0.00014865423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025426385,0.0011298616,0.001140003,0.00084845227,0.001930183,0.0017322545,0.0013875312,0.00044035263,0.0007253407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063368515,0.00104611,0.000593393,0.0016503648,0.0007799807,0.0041284775,0.00032331105,0.0024773236,0.00069384644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001068347,0.0005019408,0.00089435355,0.00014782064,0.0008968357,0.00008183472,0.000865541,0.003967494,0.0061411033,0.96732414,0.011858829,0.0062517617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012563536,0.0006340037,0.0009783109,0.0008124336,0.001139673,0.00020089324,0.008345743,0.023150276,0.009698798,0.29156587,0.64776146,0.003148999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010022295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014503212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6757583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001807233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015239022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410444879","doi":"10.17159//1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental justice; Environmental planning; Economic Justice; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Law","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410444879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95226735,0.03534466,0.0028389683,0.0012717925,0.0006714333,0.0039192038,0.0001980595,0.00011291428,0.0033756082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942202,0.001514771,0.0017062399,0.000064572996,0.00028031936,0.00032525478,0.00006408432,0.00005577752,0.0017688068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939858,0.0010687158,0.0012452503,0.0006706359,0.00094854797,0.0020810664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969546,0.00095513125,0.0009350529,0.00046701095,0.00013223238,0.0005559356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036968032,0.0007196401,0.0008723829,0.00023513452,0.006301845,0.0006273737,0.0007429029,0.00036055595,0.000046496632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066517317,0.0005871628,0.0002054928,0.0005168308,0.0011302358,0.00055446726,0.00059507793,0.0016193831,0.0000037392106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008361187,0.0034809469,0.058577295,0.0015903814,0.014299101,0.00009510748,0.68165225,0.00048410665,0.07538506,0.04389282,0.02037816,0.091803595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010740284,0.0021837738,0.0041497312,0.0014799867,0.0033937944,0.00014907354,0.28759193,0.0006328006,0.0106470315,0.010076924,0.6662941,0.002660549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002493371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016814492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043772135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415300917","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a20220","title":"The Judiciary's Contribution to Preventing Protected Area Downgrading, Downsizing, and Degazettement: Mining and Environmental Justice Community of South Africa v MEC for Agriculture, Rural Development Land and Environmental Affairs (1322/2021) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 48 (18 July 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set-aside; Situated; Protected area; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental justice; Marine protected area; Rural area; Biodiversity; Convention","score_opus":0.010362434990230969,"score_gpt":0.2489336477855339,"score_spread":0.23857121279530294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415300917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95226735,0.03534466,0.0028389683,0.0012717925,0.0006714333,0.0039192038,0.0001980595,0.00011291428,0.0033756082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942202,0.001514771,0.0017062399,0.000064572996,0.00028031936,0.00032525478,0.00006408432,0.00005577752,0.0017688068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939858,0.0010687158,0.0012452503,0.0006706359,0.00094854797,0.0020810664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969546,0.00095513125,0.0009350529,0.00046701095,0.00013223238,0.0005559356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036968032,0.0007196401,0.0008723829,0.00023513452,0.006301845,0.0006273737,0.0007429029,0.00036055595,0.000046496632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066517317,0.0005871628,0.0002054928,0.0005168308,0.0011302358,0.00055446726,0.00059507793,0.0016193831,0.0000037392106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008361187,0.0034809469,0.058577295,0.0015903814,0.014299101,0.00009510748,0.68165225,0.00048410665,0.07538506,0.04389282,0.02037816,0.091803595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010740284,0.0021837738,0.0041497312,0.0014799867,0.0033937944,0.00014907354,0.28759193,0.0006328006,0.0106470315,0.010076924,0.6662941,0.002660549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002493371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016814492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043772135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}