{"meta":{"query_hash":"90fe748c4389","filters":{"venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90fe748c4389","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Pragmatics+%26+Cognition"},"results":[{"id":"W1979138239","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.04cha","title":"Ideomotor design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Robotics and Automated Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Perception; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive science; Mental representation; Video game; Representation (politics); Mental rotation; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.011213544197071393,"score_gpt":0.2089733607085249,"score_spread":0.19775981651145352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979138239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014747369,0.0008699712,0.7570399,0.00071313005,0.0016197696,0.003232258,0.0012735962,0.0024456882,0.21805836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23088978,0.0009728339,0.67436236,0.001676232,0.000320635,0.011079852,0.0015342641,0.0012289813,0.07793507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979426,0.0008150785,0.00025034515,0.0004920634,0.00030704832,0.00019291803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978561,0.00091445923,0.0001187635,0.00052029634,0.00040869755,0.00018166439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024180734,0.001512491,0.0006936818,0.0009637365,0.00096910173,0.0022948496,0.0016459485,0.0013971126,0.08487449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007860272,0.00045123833,0.00086596486,0.0005786309,0.0018676682,0.0018225913,0.003779027,0.001175854,0.01578934],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020586934,0.00048246008,0.001829681,0.002510042,0.00007114793,0.00085468555,0.0023417994,0.003074762,0.034826603,0.45128703,0.0219733,0.47868985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011769403,0.0020927454,0.0024754487,0.000637697,0.00021823154,0.0023846102,0.0011313625,0.014670721,0.024053097,0.15481196,0.7962025,0.00014461455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003688334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056156865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08487449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066848187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087977055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2839334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980921678","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.16kan","title":"Speech transformation solutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Speech Recognition and Synthesis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dictation; Computer science; Spotting; Speech recognition; Keyword spotting; Perception; Interface (matter); Distributive property; Transformation (genetics); Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.022333147322471096,"score_gpt":0.23427528483208632,"score_spread":0.2119421375096152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980921678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065292795,0.0014998786,0.851301,0.0017619919,0.0011347111,0.00043946746,0.00087493856,0.019573608,0.116885014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14153454,0.002994813,0.500022,0.0026262326,0.00096922345,0.00090558245,0.008598472,0.0042142705,0.3381349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845874,0.00015780148,0.00010683229,0.00039049945,0.0007080364,0.0001779731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888915,0.00017268176,0.00005286867,0.00032196284,0.00049555494,0.000067714784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009917837,0.0011486346,0.00059314794,0.0012602649,0.0011572967,0.002744611,0.0024603724,0.00205877,0.079508625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023658087,0.00045181077,0.00075966807,0.0009490824,0.00061423687,0.002737671,0.0030629698,0.001915085,0.056739055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031606774,0.00024502003,0.0003795194,0.00035606982,0.000041592488,0.0003497347,0.00056525203,0.0041223047,0.047142256,0.07480525,0.047624514,0.82405233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008992062,0.00018758824,0.00050646946,0.00014269479,0.000048076316,0.001166925,0.000552991,0.03968579,0.07019388,0.04277687,0.8445781,0.00007074934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011105884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010220775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079508625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090198114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012715334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26598287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994949853","doi":"10.1075/pc.11.1.06rot","title":"From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Modalities; Nonverbal communication; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Cognition; Competence (human resources); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Multimodality; Cognitive science; Communication; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07797080367069067,"score_gpt":0.3891698717173427,"score_spread":0.311199068046652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994949853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11849312,0.013220612,0.15386847,0.025139805,0.00087497814,0.00010310623,0.00019562745,0.0005609342,0.68754345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683424,0.003246222,0.018609395,0.000695247,0.00029220217,0.00009126085,0.0000802568,0.00010598607,0.008537006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562305,0.0026465016,0.0002476998,0.00050034426,0.0007022403,0.00028018965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928525,0.004347448,0.0007789127,0.0010080913,0.0006215769,0.00039144422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045324145,0.0006355358,0.00029738632,0.0023081275,0.0025082415,0.00941287,0.0009100084,0.0021342582,0.0053102733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015270634,0.00052632805,0.00043116254,0.0010075152,0.031321898,0.012972456,0.0065993215,0.0023748248,0.0009488541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052352963,0.000016834812,0.0008618245,0.0002738128,0.000009812685,0.00031971486,0.030491935,0.00030787097,0.0012945903,0.9415316,0.0009536134,0.023885943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024890434,0.00005231985,0.0023509045,0.00034476843,0.000021576076,0.00081672356,0.015915044,0.00081509573,0.0018482172,0.8993292,0.0784403,0.000040988027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013547183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095384114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00941287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019461289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001984996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023969948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996666899","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.2.02che","title":"Recognizing sarcasm without language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Prosody; Linguistics; Sincerity; Psychology; Active listening; Irony; Spoken language; Intonation (linguistics); Communication; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0516756280067124,"score_gpt":0.31279589992841317,"score_spread":0.2611202719217008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996666899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870008,0.00039804398,0.006783449,0.000098090495,0.000051773535,0.000048388385,0.00005275864,0.0000867247,0.0054799314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994034,0.00026784703,0.0037272305,0.00012452599,0.000020985124,0.000044998847,0.00008160494,0.000018732211,0.0016801099],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994685,0.00020736182,0.000035609963,0.000110099005,0.000113830865,0.00006462833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800485,0.0006155839,0.00042967286,0.00021099247,0.0006121396,0.00012668817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084214343,0.00047662784,0.00031612662,0.00030702096,0.00025568763,0.00092414167,0.00026537193,0.0006920742,0.001425243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004307121,0.00019131014,0.00019843379,0.000090287285,0.00048042796,0.0010402882,0.00073923264,0.00036566568,0.0005721317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018089935,0.00019691873,0.06392775,0.0012407287,0.000109326604,0.0016416195,0.025389887,0.00038671162,0.7907719,0.0009919426,0.0012874521,0.11224674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011296596,0.005045905,0.74864024,0.00058327673,0.00033345842,0.008190452,0.045959517,0.00791302,0.16555224,0.0029617932,0.014445258,0.00026194242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000763651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019131008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001425243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022182759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002593671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0047678947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005174739","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.1.09cor","title":"Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Minimalism (technical communication); Proposition; Utterance; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Philosophy; Semantic theory of truth; Value (mathematics); Truth value; Counterexample; Linguistics; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04304640448116723,"score_gpt":0.2956730208095352,"score_spread":0.252626616328368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005174739","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07791154,0.012213195,0.46692014,0.03656798,0.00067273783,0.00012707293,0.00025771157,0.00040520375,0.4049244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585633,0.0016622577,0.031868935,0.0012567049,0.00044529504,0.00015170642,0.00010849396,0.00009233281,0.005850916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958591,0.0024551407,0.00018431808,0.00064281817,0.000493573,0.0003649265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732995,0.001506938,0.0002645534,0.00043708738,0.0002810021,0.0001804853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003533048,0.000518015,0.0006119824,0.0017704725,0.0030267125,0.0039997576,0.0011396441,0.0012045577,0.0037217226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037301127,0.00042006795,0.0011425035,0.0011010042,0.016593108,0.006644115,0.0047371374,0.002934525,0.0003574009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057369634,0.0000030494127,0.000102904894,0.000021507652,0.000005361874,0.000022852262,0.00064594473,0.00017490808,0.000058132115,0.99726874,0.00024221968,0.0014486328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003993219,0.0000070579376,0.00021901702,0.000018683892,0.0000054291095,0.00004150412,0.00037958918,0.000450503,0.000087092376,0.98972404,0.009056865,0.000006185143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00333718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031709836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039997576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029137933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013389967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021141112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009926695","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.2.01vil","title":"Revisiting pragmatic abilities in autism spectrum disorders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Literal (mathematical logic); Psychology; Linguistics; Literal and figurative language; Metonymy; Grammar; Irony; Pragmatics; Metaphor; Possessive; Class (philosophy); Autism; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019341298104383387,"score_gpt":0.2804843630756579,"score_spread":0.2611430649712745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009926695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321041,0.023873562,0.0036931948,0.018875578,0.00047538432,0.00006808163,0.00020382451,0.000039791958,0.020666515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339676,0.0035462086,0.0014565733,0.00080194697,0.00011359777,0.000041738982,0.000049275375,0.000013144944,0.0005807346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974975,0.0009808771,0.00028757923,0.00042147067,0.00061558647,0.00019696013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913771,0.005570083,0.0013656813,0.00039588157,0.0008706152,0.00042059226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003940291,0.000604243,0.0005970559,0.004502601,0.0010300983,0.0021648924,0.000826712,0.0012471891,0.0019679188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015636815,0.00043212407,0.00070656784,0.0013079379,0.006891919,0.005478316,0.0051348344,0.0020080875,0.00014496864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025959077,0.00034489462,0.4359337,0.0023849509,0.00027973417,0.01910917,0.3178403,0.0004117673,0.011427639,0.060548145,0.005087405,0.14637272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006085997,0.00034098237,0.6887618,0.002527981,0.00024462937,0.024682287,0.16335243,0.0008534561,0.0013302519,0.075441286,0.04225814,0.00014590641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007818175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009557459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007818175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018330459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02083844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020500505","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin","title":"Out of the Space of Reasons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Common Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Realm; Space (punctuation); Personhood; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer security; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10904715622007047,"score_gpt":0.2552478712419941,"score_spread":0.14620071502192364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020500505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050509654,0.009658148,0.29748124,0.03723267,0.0013832914,0.000105588675,0.00026582685,0.0003788459,0.6029847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94302106,0.0016853021,0.030883508,0.001510633,0.00045192236,0.00013085209,0.00016362798,0.00022882858,0.021924164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991335,0.0057668085,0.00029931578,0.00091620244,0.0012231834,0.00045956776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075305,0.005900898,0.0006639812,0.0013607641,0.00091455545,0.00040680295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007265979,0.00069775706,0.0007709717,0.0023297798,0.005361198,0.012110149,0.0010649662,0.003202529,0.010779521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013027232,0.0004752523,0.0013046787,0.0014254989,0.030958608,0.020162137,0.007092287,0.004070853,0.0016008127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097347465,0.0000022785557,0.000070956296,0.00002198136,0.0000032758458,0.000030900428,0.002121517,0.000101462196,0.000067957975,0.9951343,0.00041217412,0.0020235307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010314853,0.000011356146,0.000089058645,0.000051861614,0.0000070454375,0.00007637368,0.0018120733,0.00041545773,0.00014631903,0.9473883,0.04998317,0.0000085993515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011716188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009990718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012110149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020841288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027284487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038426638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023187384","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.01wal","title":"The Carneades model of argument invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Inference; Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04691921290485994,"score_gpt":0.27177970308648586,"score_spread":0.2248604901816259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023187384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013395548,0.0018643704,0.47069854,0.010133109,0.00027228898,0.00022369063,0.00028922112,0.0006323381,0.5024909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56357485,0.0019004176,0.28763235,0.0012061825,0.00033597797,0.0006613389,0.00038850255,0.0002954588,0.1440049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955804,0.0016679994,0.00026516212,0.0008786211,0.00123696,0.00037098024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969945,0.0014059349,0.00020467376,0.0007197752,0.0004563121,0.00021884574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044649723,0.0009482106,0.0007940763,0.003729627,0.004492132,0.009147035,0.00263966,0.004640892,0.01841573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077019418,0.00078717555,0.0024132195,0.0024843095,0.013203456,0.013920198,0.0048440946,0.003488581,0.002966568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032852813,0.000002401476,0.000020139514,0.00001051278,0.0000021104772,0.000028238033,0.00020228629,0.00039176334,0.000034277946,0.99758863,0.00035852133,0.0013579313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020325144,0.000008204358,0.0000428216,0.000025847878,0.000008460878,0.0001019901,0.000108285916,0.004420038,0.00022264049,0.95031077,0.04472003,0.000010666399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005233439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003499208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01841573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046516866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025184264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061606705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026508940","doi":"10.1075/pc.12.1.11rot","title":"Theory and praxis of metacognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.032056797429351205,"score_gpt":0.37173431117499817,"score_spread":0.339677513745647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026508940","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045037612,0.028758172,0.4802905,0.051589474,0.00092174084,0.00020608914,0.00031768656,0.0004974496,0.39238116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88639927,0.013182462,0.07687766,0.002827466,0.0008459874,0.0006376093,0.00018953394,0.00009177122,0.018948164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732673,0.0013454307,0.0001344658,0.000400812,0.0006529829,0.00013961882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895544,0.0071007777,0.00077461585,0.0014736,0.0007466018,0.00035000633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053051426,0.0005305864,0.0005893279,0.0033282724,0.0009501676,0.005370609,0.0014778586,0.0018111789,0.0060154623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012534446,0.00044507353,0.0006912779,0.0012884414,0.01975232,0.0076761,0.0022395572,0.002990424,0.0011569324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012723618,0.000026369882,0.0005395443,0.000179777,0.000018662187,0.000034474022,0.0011654128,0.0005479274,0.00013024635,0.97550404,0.0016006862,0.02024017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096345275,0.00001421484,0.00052082946,0.000101374084,0.000006509822,0.00008166046,0.00019135118,0.00088166806,0.00015392093,0.9905505,0.0074807075,0.000007505833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011460623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008206532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060154623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025397167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026021642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028056622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027599522","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.03val","title":"On local bars and imported beer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Linguistics; Sentence; Truth condition; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Prima facie; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.020274034048008364,"score_gpt":0.2976193521228441,"score_spread":0.27734531807483576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027599522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14757082,0.0011328129,0.00152868,0.0059615145,0.00035127698,0.000015246192,0.00018890895,0.00005383278,0.84319675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853538,0.0006334307,0.0005087027,0.001033478,0.00009889331,0.000007346173,0.00014781901,0.00008605112,0.11213046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977654,0.00007282822,0.000004403528,0.00004593393,0.000051656578,0.000048715403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998574,0.000049722006,0.000016858727,0.000013728758,0.000038787,0.0000235869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017758725,0.00024602682,0.00016227635,0.00037535126,0.0027783185,0.0022476248,0.00026009913,0.00089371257,0.020859843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005317995,0.00016441764,0.00020129338,0.0004228042,0.0026558507,0.0022992385,0.0012615552,0.0010628869,0.001519258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026789843,0.00007545663,0.004707239,0.00023053313,0.000040624822,0.0033014333,0.13195404,0.00018714598,0.0039235735,0.77018017,0.054018386,0.031113533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021352485,0.000092884984,0.018647265,0.00022150716,0.00003584141,0.0015000274,0.1494116,0.00033410083,0.0024390551,0.058729343,0.7685156,0.000051557807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011957999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032356832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020859843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014266791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003054546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031990438","doi":"10.1075/pc.9.2.04ols","title":"What writing is","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Adjunct; Compromise; Linguistics; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Direct speech; Indirect speech; Exploit; Speech act; Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03035789479025274,"score_gpt":0.3469682667578406,"score_spread":0.31661037196758784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031990438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115479985,0.008302245,0.0030718006,0.053676035,0.009521463,0.000046767855,0.0004931209,0.00022092402,0.9131196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.484398,0.016904078,0.003482344,0.023439508,0.008581607,0.00010935215,0.0013701969,0.00044603215,0.4612689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973252,0.0009408178,0.00016720696,0.00047266704,0.0007505448,0.00034356673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967931,0.0007815039,0.00036795673,0.0006015192,0.0006958096,0.0007600392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016327673,0.00028431293,0.00035658985,0.0010225738,0.0032180392,0.010590001,0.00040807054,0.0014177393,0.042098243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070347115,0.00013336507,0.00026968605,0.0013195021,0.0057825325,0.0074081416,0.0017140132,0.0018387518,0.01411526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052722502,0.00007384335,0.003485348,0.00055702525,0.00003812351,0.0005789109,0.036614057,0.00008675311,0.0010333257,0.54139614,0.22506368,0.19102007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004569937,0.000020182764,0.0022148609,0.00034927178,0.00000869252,0.00034358294,0.008435585,0.00002874895,0.00019720414,0.04563601,0.94274807,0.000013161451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020623049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027247688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042098243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001167421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020100074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14083266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039246849","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.1.07rut","title":"On the use and misuse of the “Two Children” brainteaser","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Illusion; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.027197197498866368,"score_gpt":0.28454544594444664,"score_spread":0.2573482484455803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039246849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1334007,0.01134967,0.085975565,0.26919127,0.0024460722,0.0001324664,0.00013498956,0.00042548173,0.49694386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243823,0.0056426222,0.020485519,0.029041259,0.00071278214,0.00022344176,0.000059323393,0.00058502704,0.01886768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95469695,0.030237777,0.0018519843,0.004554219,0.0072349454,0.0014240842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.896446,0.07974915,0.0068772687,0.009366322,0.0064347093,0.0011264981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036513556,0.00093151216,0.0006879331,0.0021555156,0.009599731,0.007689958,0.0024741385,0.009533839,0.0046917833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080767095,0.0008111993,0.0006165066,0.0019926112,0.07436925,0.02365735,0.0077701765,0.012228429,0.0015590762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007876198,0.000021516376,0.0012674354,0.00009114566,0.000012629974,0.00049127516,0.047318343,0.00007803801,0.00064149266,0.9153584,0.011042492,0.02359852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000516938,0.00012278103,0.003103781,0.0010318755,0.000046501467,0.0035763928,0.0661114,0.001206157,0.0037356112,0.5622388,0.35859808,0.00017693052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005023895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052680364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036513556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031644625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024176848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19310445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040258355","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.2.06god","title":"A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Foundation (evidence); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05674631934493059,"score_gpt":0.29331665308833654,"score_spread":0.23657033374340597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040258355","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00828866,0.003638131,0.8027431,0.017211255,0.00043654328,0.00009285421,0.00013554668,0.00021674266,0.16723725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6671743,0.0023095282,0.3119723,0.002151471,0.00076111907,0.0004555889,0.0002686769,0.0001792179,0.014727827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929778,0.0038247667,0.0005376253,0.00081288884,0.0015056425,0.00034116278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675203,0.008599137,0.0009195723,0.0021849799,0.001107914,0.00043635172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008992348,0.0007370608,0.0010846707,0.0029014745,0.0047564027,0.008535993,0.003729319,0.0041640704,0.0058914903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017196095,0.00065497716,0.0018863325,0.002760048,0.023079285,0.022324637,0.0055486406,0.00540731,0.0013638183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019495035,0.000002110044,0.000027053055,0.000014061601,0.0000017109131,0.000020884318,0.0004351381,0.00017867946,0.000023248289,0.9973972,0.00022273672,0.0016752111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036954727,0.0000033225476,0.00002864282,0.000028723873,0.0000024971907,0.000042320364,0.000116623385,0.0009534027,0.000034139142,0.99100924,0.0077741956,0.0000033085905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018825262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008992348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048434255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026624391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04755664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043836746","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.1.11lau","title":"Pragmatics, Pittsburgh style","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.030217415862094366,"score_gpt":0.24760853803667665,"score_spread":0.21739112217458229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043836746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047596274,0.0068573025,0.2666289,0.020198015,0.0009853387,0.0001481823,0.0016704892,0.0007821272,0.69797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5607861,0.008463023,0.20626353,0.0059400597,0.0031029976,0.00083088956,0.0023188163,0.0011118967,0.21118264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989392,0.00035926275,0.00007977113,0.00029460443,0.00025840916,0.00006866812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0001770511,0.0000522446,0.00012558563,0.00013013203,0.000041038245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001967874,0.001110307,0.000667973,0.0016470632,0.0030426017,0.004350217,0.0012920235,0.001277652,0.03033268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034519385,0.0007464518,0.0011025156,0.001887952,0.005299278,0.009144589,0.0024757807,0.0024347259,0.006423049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024362414,0.0000022262761,0.000034789566,0.000022839371,0.0000036641995,0.000013958632,0.00015723541,0.00011351973,0.000030499097,0.9894705,0.0063439556,0.0038044264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006040294,0.000004416591,0.00011824985,0.000016173099,0.0000040572536,0.000039268245,0.000049309016,0.00050969527,0.00004652758,0.9388906,0.06031131,0.0000044835674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005446335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004923758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03033268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034524275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013673583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101472914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047012610","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.3.06har","title":"Distributed processes, distributed cognizers, and collaborative cognition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Socially distributed cognition; Feeling; Cognitive science; Thinking processes; Process (computing); Need for cognition; Test (biology); Computer science; Turing test; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.013068579044466282,"score_gpt":0.2520850149167202,"score_spread":0.2390164358722539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047012610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14977422,0.017983064,0.321198,0.026542883,0.0005367703,0.00022005715,0.0001081021,0.0006116894,0.48302522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95961446,0.0022809624,0.027575538,0.0007568346,0.0003631195,0.0001771591,0.000053665048,0.000062796345,0.009115493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550027,0.0021332768,0.00018149547,0.0010310145,0.0007836161,0.0003704111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488395,0.0028283899,0.0005121923,0.00096524827,0.0003671784,0.00044294252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004520861,0.00068073143,0.0005371399,0.0024121671,0.0022184923,0.007956626,0.0011168278,0.0026454157,0.0050274166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007353901,0.00036721549,0.0007534185,0.0019626187,0.019464226,0.01529506,0.005397443,0.002639872,0.000596316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011414004,0.000016149526,0.00035833856,0.000041863364,0.00001277272,0.00005732749,0.003210757,0.00049910956,0.00012749177,0.98636013,0.0004993752,0.008805213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016308528,0.0000073665283,0.00027064898,0.000017424014,0.000006130502,0.000056316203,0.00048595338,0.0008453543,0.00007644175,0.9916972,0.00651582,0.0000051064517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024271484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013053822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007956626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029223256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017557374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023908913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050367651","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.3.13har","title":"Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autopoiesis; Superordinate goals; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Turing; Metaphor; Cognition; Enactivism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11821899399094947,"score_gpt":0.40231265517869885,"score_spread":0.28409366118774937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050367651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024103446,0.0144105945,0.73935413,0.054632556,0.0011300999,0.00008035958,0.00021704457,0.0004970105,0.16557465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821758,0.005508856,0.15187076,0.0041969903,0.0015515083,0.0003152479,0.000115036346,0.00017771921,0.014505876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985958,0.00078189094,0.00006121992,0.00020977913,0.0002363954,0.00011491518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984004,0.00089789374,0.000166724,0.00032423498,0.000110851026,0.00009992432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004282001,0.00077092805,0.0008986287,0.0017823738,0.0012678662,0.002588372,0.0022599762,0.0028393192,0.005311175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004242131,0.00037659195,0.001374974,0.0012676857,0.015294968,0.008390818,0.0018961899,0.0032841724,0.00075956236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027993,0.0000019805382,0.000022500164,0.000013026193,0.0000031721859,0.000009181983,0.00013424875,0.00020694653,0.000030164445,0.99828136,0.00030196525,0.0009926695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036088754,0.0000067433407,0.000059829898,0.000009375721,0.0000030171982,0.000022585931,0.000056066117,0.0008376024,0.00006465392,0.9915045,0.007425826,0.000006203643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066927995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075569435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005311175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001675707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075183064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022645652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051971282","doi":"10.1075/pc.17.2.01sta","title":"Perry, Wittgenstein’s builders, and metasemantics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Block (permutation group theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026674861337420124,"score_gpt":0.2311185816114544,"score_spread":0.2044437202740343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051971282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12376738,0.013163057,0.1379409,0.033931572,0.0008391162,0.00006212351,0.00022939856,0.00038184426,0.6896846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597644,0.0017214454,0.015824623,0.0010832901,0.00019105895,0.000040227656,0.000070052505,0.000105190156,0.021199718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989507,0.0005068041,0.000055683708,0.00017247713,0.000227573,0.000086685104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999181,0.00041904795,0.000102929094,0.000112283924,0.00013277921,0.000052008247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014446465,0.00040707842,0.0002903698,0.0015000085,0.0018143826,0.00277294,0.00063988235,0.0012121305,0.0034681438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021484974,0.00043189945,0.0003071826,0.0009987202,0.010723755,0.007482216,0.002140289,0.0019511953,0.00051639805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035929038,0.000002028162,0.000047029465,0.000016500757,0.0000021327853,0.000025765057,0.0013841077,0.00004299653,0.00007115494,0.9954184,0.0008244421,0.0021618675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006502661,0.000008418745,0.00018646666,0.000030121124,0.000008809148,0.000106018975,0.0011908524,0.00027442118,0.00043853634,0.95264393,0.04509718,0.000008671401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020616513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028947874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034681438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019043032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009241571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013816774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080521047","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.05val","title":"Unarticulated comparison classes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Predicate (mathematical logic); Indexicality; Linguistics; Utterance; Perspective (graphical); Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03679927968927353,"score_gpt":0.3006408775835764,"score_spread":0.26384159789430284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080521047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11938459,0.0015847142,0.110612854,0.0016345889,0.0005185217,0.00019122942,0.002761771,0.0011073607,0.76220423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9035496,0.00039016496,0.026725497,0.0003244879,0.00021248455,0.00020110783,0.0024703317,0.00046123294,0.065665014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972377,0.00048782644,0.00019485489,0.0010921996,0.0005782854,0.00040923088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981558,0.00056314236,0.0002017353,0.00051610806,0.00040095334,0.00016225508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016614042,0.000489354,0.00058590836,0.0012881635,0.0026175852,0.0051240134,0.0019081351,0.001162519,0.04050683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004551462,0.00031158718,0.0006956885,0.0012224242,0.0032251154,0.009350575,0.0031909675,0.0016493723,0.0045317304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010396571,0.000020693105,0.00045434874,0.000057586356,0.000011591673,0.00009488456,0.0010165004,0.00013896674,0.0010814075,0.9710627,0.0036635706,0.022293702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005145401,0.00006206178,0.002688776,0.000070345726,0.00003481991,0.00036419422,0.0015604473,0.0021011764,0.002522174,0.7557909,0.23471825,0.00003544097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014900749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013730818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04050683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002609692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068151497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1355089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100684635","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.04poi","title":"A framework for thinking about distributed cognition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cognition; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Fuzzy cognitive map; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Socially distributed cognition; Fuzzy logic; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02292693330644633,"score_gpt":0.28517921364585436,"score_spread":0.262252280339408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100684635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040656035,0.0060856,0.86661893,0.02082017,0.0005792227,0.00015926626,0.00013687788,0.00033323953,0.10120109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53374696,0.004666562,0.4369074,0.0034052657,0.0012205841,0.0011319768,0.00022026099,0.00020937787,0.018491706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654645,0.0017519438,0.00020448133,0.00063921843,0.00058582064,0.00027216884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980818,0.00088076317,0.00015337851,0.00034981957,0.00025099594,0.0002831583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056019817,0.0012666151,0.0009911361,0.0027363682,0.003530494,0.009874493,0.003315478,0.0042995615,0.006863566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033593713,0.00060379656,0.0018689879,0.0022575583,0.01950329,0.014926662,0.0043835375,0.0059764422,0.001191083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013677119,0.0000016982794,0.000014159397,0.000015791566,0.0000032229707,0.000020834055,0.000316861,0.000425141,0.000026795731,0.9980179,0.000313076,0.00084319216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007817857,0.0000046986725,0.000023750013,0.000019354622,0.0000029518114,0.000029507097,0.00018386498,0.0014831399,0.000021004436,0.9800617,0.01815832,0.0000038005455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055403616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031089727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009874493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068539656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003223857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049729228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244035841","doi":"10.1075/pc.22.1.04kna","title":"A developmental approach to ancient innovation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Creativity; Scale (ratio); Embodied cognition; Process (computing); Economic geography; Cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Archaeology; Computer science; Geography; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01919202006520681,"score_gpt":0.2037573877328252,"score_spread":0.18456536766761839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244035841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025182636,0.009429248,0.21761137,0.015958423,0.000398519,0.00014385786,0.00014058853,0.00010865124,0.73102677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8211867,0.006285002,0.109280474,0.0016178035,0.00026032873,0.00042437218,0.00012218305,0.00011338385,0.060709774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980453,0.0011347594,0.00006907029,0.00034057038,0.00025387315,0.00015632798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795145,0.0012273706,0.00013878933,0.00026205898,0.0002404394,0.00017988888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023782267,0.0005265258,0.0003210837,0.0027039794,0.0041327,0.0051339017,0.0016999972,0.0020803497,0.0071865204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036631622,0.00028116256,0.0005462319,0.0019322543,0.022357892,0.005619626,0.0048066974,0.0026867585,0.0008036903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017915479,0.0000035002954,0.00011407359,0.000026295089,0.0000014295989,0.00006383844,0.0018370907,0.00019156859,0.00005209572,0.9951509,0.00018918423,0.0023681906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067229103,0.000016139209,0.00031995995,0.0001094839,0.0000053086264,0.00029867978,0.0026893388,0.0012189045,0.00021428122,0.8881309,0.106980756,0.000009527701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034879823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035565137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071865204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005880149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027925954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042663634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254185234","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.02oat","title":"Worlds of the possible","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalization; Empathy; Consciousness; Suite; Narrative; Social worlds; Cognitive science; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Literature; History; Art; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017297946684733674,"score_gpt":0.2816814425742599,"score_spread":0.26438349588952625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254185234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008791114,0.0065476624,0.02912828,0.01980144,0.000710006,0.00006892711,0.00023692643,0.00013477393,0.93458086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8550764,0.007771656,0.02632925,0.0039160866,0.0006735404,0.00039047998,0.0005493683,0.0002275641,0.1050656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961941,0.0021586223,0.00012436046,0.0005671986,0.00057665125,0.0003789904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978781,0.0006702576,0.0001300473,0.00082377944,0.00020654948,0.00029140565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023905628,0.0008810125,0.00068241375,0.0015878886,0.0064842254,0.01729263,0.0014276936,0.0029820066,0.025901366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053224596,0.00050274364,0.0008439682,0.0009390644,0.028994702,0.019295702,0.009533704,0.004510692,0.004103007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004934438,0.000004068119,0.00005453454,0.00002025492,0.000004443004,0.000046022913,0.0029506802,0.0000855629,0.000043265954,0.99100834,0.0026299753,0.003147877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007095052,0.0000074150425,0.00010086444,0.000121448255,0.000005645017,0.00016336277,0.0038168735,0.00016970038,0.00006103676,0.75108016,0.24445598,0.000010281424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020162757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021970982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025901366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030586324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029843154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08664876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289326418","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.01ols","title":"Literacy and the languages of rationality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Literacy; Dimension (graph theory); Relation (database); Epistemology; Logical conjunction; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01771214698085294,"score_gpt":0.34987692843289153,"score_spread":0.3321647814520386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289326418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11861784,0.015452873,0.034409497,0.04879789,0.00031849684,0.000036915055,0.000111635214,0.00018292612,0.78207195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98029685,0.002457419,0.004700329,0.0012127066,0.00021168956,0.0000430586,0.00003025353,0.00004769863,0.011000008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951277,0.003665544,0.00015176949,0.0003274506,0.00047655415,0.00025101507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923884,0.0056663933,0.00063648395,0.0006661471,0.00040683063,0.00023575615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035321047,0.0002291481,0.00025353295,0.0016416118,0.002065479,0.007950166,0.0004739885,0.0016243283,0.0031518976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010289369,0.0001893204,0.0002656851,0.0010582166,0.024113597,0.0068199066,0.0034101105,0.0022514274,0.00053890946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008864728,0.0000046419805,0.00021666558,0.000020932714,0.000001821746,0.000049853425,0.0055568838,0.00010266122,0.000088190216,0.9879089,0.0006232466,0.0054173293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009313635,0.000012392797,0.00053787854,0.00011671431,0.0000034877003,0.00012420847,0.002264697,0.00035890524,0.00021244363,0.9495453,0.04680363,0.00001114101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001980664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013262111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007950166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019968837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019211611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018679798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896512482","doi":"10.1075/pc.17013.mar","title":"Embodied concept mapping","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Cognition; Perception; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04361702205331579,"score_gpt":0.32623971627669823,"score_spread":0.28262269422338243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896512482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069580056,0.0023853658,0.64087325,0.0026510092,0.00048628173,0.00020167862,0.00022800174,0.00058671425,0.28300765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917616,0.0010701106,0.18067947,0.00029953974,0.00004949531,0.00017347062,0.0002100947,0.00012448152,0.025631795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989542,0.0004332952,0.000048035992,0.00021734551,0.00026920362,0.000077937926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892884,0.0005024666,0.00007487568,0.00027050747,0.00014295544,0.00008030997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011399384,0.0004761381,0.00031483543,0.0009543152,0.0010024618,0.0033134886,0.0008760948,0.0010988923,0.013308151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058883773,0.00030209945,0.0006126629,0.00067394634,0.003852623,0.0069579915,0.004165728,0.001217931,0.0011996615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031302778,0.000020300264,0.00024046509,0.00014595826,0.000017018474,0.0002450867,0.0053020203,0.0013863078,0.0031685396,0.9414774,0.0015757359,0.04638984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002120822,0.00004830111,0.00046922296,0.0001248038,0.000016895063,0.0008573588,0.0027447494,0.011196831,0.0023391254,0.8925352,0.08961891,0.000027410686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006078053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004773724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013308151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010539979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04452014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121502482","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.1.04mac","title":"Reasoning from paradigms and negative evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.060265549585889686,"score_gpt":0.25863810750957417,"score_spread":0.19837255792368447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121502482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039377347,0.0042796726,0.8051632,0.05675982,0.0009891866,0.00023096561,0.0003144642,0.00033347917,0.0925519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65093344,0.0022419963,0.33111006,0.007955397,0.0010349195,0.00048206295,0.00042916674,0.00013631149,0.0056766104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654776,0.024756258,0.0019278507,0.002744503,0.0041328706,0.0009608759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93471247,0.049365684,0.00354512,0.007431297,0.003348299,0.0015971313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184249,0.001356199,0.0012793093,0.00317083,0.003699596,0.011642609,0.004130905,0.0063008764,0.005175007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05881553,0.0013203733,0.0030797734,0.0017655435,0.027474623,0.028311687,0.014314837,0.011835407,0.00081606826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024884686,0.000015183211,0.00022343079,0.00010396384,0.000036334506,0.00019268726,0.0009055426,0.0009046056,0.0002316032,0.99171036,0.00095227925,0.0046991836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010653041,0.0000046873174,0.000028487706,0.000024011668,0.000006554291,0.00006662819,0.0000953065,0.0010314578,0.00015397932,0.9961773,0.0023931416,0.000007847871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013076264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015071522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047170194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024188834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16840118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123209816","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.1.03wal","title":"Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argumentation theory; Conversation; Computer science; Persuasion; Equivocation; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Vagueness; Transitive relation; Epistemology; The Internet; Negotiation; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Management science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Sociology; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07546235976159879,"score_gpt":0.31612151839266284,"score_spread":0.24065915863106405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123209816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010119233,0.0035042963,0.9484006,0.008846684,0.00054467097,0.0002834905,0.00005112476,0.0002777309,0.02797228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38898236,0.0039426177,0.5969515,0.0012591992,0.0008881394,0.0009472963,0.00014694089,0.00021489602,0.0066670678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741141,0.0192526,0.0015549383,0.001669132,0.002634267,0.0007750388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326611,0.054953173,0.003907081,0.004822651,0.0023909444,0.0012650779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028843632,0.0016772817,0.0016060775,0.0036555626,0.004850632,0.008527189,0.0030180456,0.0048934147,0.0035399392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07144748,0.0012062788,0.002257235,0.0024007794,0.013811275,0.02576275,0.008546274,0.006794661,0.0007628273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037948008,0.00003426088,0.00018781122,0.00012037447,0.000025161067,0.00008270589,0.0020922383,0.006993053,0.00024814333,0.966989,0.0008103802,0.022379007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026709631,0.000025624893,0.00006294756,0.00010789511,0.000019825191,0.00011078577,0.00053997093,0.022969091,0.00045296043,0.96116513,0.014487997,0.000030960855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013572903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093352946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028843632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036752967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034438726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15254152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404877463","doi":"10.1075/pc.24039.olk","title":"Training studies provide new insights about mechanisms of irony development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Training (meteorology); Psychology; Art; Literature; Geography","score_opus":0.09439507786787515,"score_gpt":0.352955237888043,"score_spread":0.25856016002016785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404877463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74727315,0.08900364,0.06818671,0.015291688,0.0010728997,0.00024360177,0.0004243489,0.0007001123,0.07780386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95547175,0.02011184,0.016378142,0.001378797,0.00021398047,0.00016432416,0.00012439505,0.00009113366,0.006065628],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995497,0.00017687818,0.000024860972,0.000113454065,0.00009143979,0.000043675664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630666,0.0025035546,0.00048293627,0.00028383482,0.00026047492,0.00016264156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014999106,0.00037065698,0.00034387404,0.00081355456,0.00022935861,0.00076220854,0.00063723075,0.0009782098,0.0064546433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004980773,0.00022029673,0.0002973302,0.00033860237,0.0015997674,0.0014226381,0.00068745826,0.0010963086,0.000534595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010717419,0.0020511446,0.02817582,0.007271152,0.00038658472,0.0022152753,0.0075909123,0.0014019163,0.1159999,0.104177505,0.009073499,0.72058463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045049295,0.004819517,0.35115302,0.009139764,0.0009045523,0.0044388273,0.006271548,0.005192495,0.057426833,0.41361743,0.14642619,0.00015928807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006674945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006843895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064546433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043189226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054071104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021592915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}