{"meta":{"query_hash":"90fe748c4389","filters":{"venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90fe748c4389","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Pragmatics+%26+Cognition"},"results":[{"id":"W1979138239","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.04cha","title":"Ideomotor design","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Robotics and Automated Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Coding (social sciences); Computer science; Perception; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive science; Mental representation; Video game; Representation (politics); Mental rotation; Human–computer interaction; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Multimedia; Sociology","score_opus":0.011213544197071393,"score_gpt":0.2089733607085249,"score_spread":0.19775981651145352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979138239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13307391,0.000048207836,0.83910376,0.0000557989,0.0019189998,0.00049370807,0.000012619331,0.0011528778,0.024140114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741429,0.000011267075,0.025569806,0.000022669961,0.0001361383,0.00003112277,0.00001775375,0.000028606348,0.0000397193],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994821,0.000016113509,0.00018133257,0.000068879046,0.000112576556,0.0001390023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968266,0.00006469596,0.000027638163,0.00012522428,0.000049877093,0.000049886625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018608761,0.000090009016,0.00009314256,0.000050961684,0.00004253507,0.00006156215,0.00006451049,0.000078616315,0.000097584634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053637235,0.00008945929,0.000024911815,0.000080785336,0.000012394224,0.00009137965,0.000007078405,0.00015411603,0.000416251],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047458852,0.000084544634,0.000045924247,0.0004335564,0.00010962232,0.000018978473,0.0006392141,0.032399222,0.932448,0.004269284,0.008237915,0.021308975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707954,0.000022438726,0.00038414157,0.00006214923,0.00003951741,0.000027782638,0.000032952274,0.9556557,0.035307925,0.0060489113,0.0019107879,0.00023692881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010581849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027730234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92325646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007774203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007391941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5350203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980921678","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.16kan","title":"Speech transformation solutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Speech Recognition and Synthesis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dictation; Computer science; Spotting; Speech recognition; Keyword spotting; Perception; Interface (matter); Distributive property; Transformation (genetics); Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.022333147322471096,"score_gpt":0.23427528483208632,"score_spread":0.2119421375096152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980921678","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008961932,0.000027063668,0.8731203,0.0013888628,0.00018447946,0.00023419573,0.000011295246,0.00036727727,0.11570456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8406129,0.000023513088,0.15861818,0.00033789268,0.0001053319,0.000050772454,0.00007831668,0.000009860954,0.00016322648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988587,0.00007294512,0.0003252376,0.00017925962,0.00031508072,0.00024877736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993432,0.000115944844,0.00009968265,0.00021167926,0.00017857728,0.000050885552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033820124,0.00011646031,0.00011152186,0.00017234411,0.00023263629,0.0002000322,0.00021847188,0.00007133424,0.00014082406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057787493,0.00011941062,0.000076445125,0.00035716878,0.00002940557,0.00085560186,0.000028866827,0.000094408904,0.00079692935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061880123,0.00045099485,0.000023075692,0.00007147132,0.00002693831,0.000015373009,0.00048552823,0.000029141569,0.0076110777,0.3224047,0.0039170254,0.6649585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014144005,0.00010214608,0.0056734676,0.0001489551,0.00011533433,0.00029887768,0.00021334298,0.27848428,0.05085349,0.6483649,0.01351523,0.00081557105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027727783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005136499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037152666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003449855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994949853","doi":"10.1075/pc.11.1.06rot","title":"From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Modalities; Nonverbal communication; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Cognition; Competence (human resources); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Multimodality; Cognitive science; Communication; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.07797080367069067,"score_gpt":0.3891698717173427,"score_spread":0.311199068046652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994949853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175164,0.00005925678,0.020634534,0.0016083443,0.0012142728,0.0004241662,0.00002613286,0.00012590771,0.058390968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929831,0.0000068574095,0.0043644244,0.00017344204,0.000071886156,0.00012913185,0.00016552284,0.000018073724,0.0020875696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887913,0.00025279887,0.00024769088,0.00022519141,0.00017414357,0.00022101175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989701,0.00017197209,0.000083207306,0.0005749665,0.00009119253,0.00010859197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043248854,0.00010166993,0.00010446703,0.00012742782,0.00023550577,0.00016512674,0.00014889309,0.00006880449,0.0011586472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020538656,0.000108204695,0.000043067463,0.00029631608,0.00006612375,0.00016934433,0.000029005445,0.0001462834,0.003763026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030057083,0.0077784695,0.0059226635,0.00016573806,0.0008312978,0.000031804582,0.14196762,0.00016942658,0.10817841,0.33717793,0.071930334,0.32554573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007571938,0.00094181777,0.12067039,0.001843347,0.0015390124,0.00012567862,0.064076535,0.0021044633,0.0159398,0.49459085,0.28765026,0.0029459365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005649098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004812467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32259977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050233077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039476847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996666899","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.2.02che","title":"Recognizing sarcasm without language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sarcasm; Prosody; Linguistics; Sincerity; Psychology; Active listening; Irony; Spoken language; Intonation (linguistics); Communication; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0516756280067124,"score_gpt":0.31279589992841317,"score_spread":0.2611202719217008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996666899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49083683,0.00035179555,0.010883415,0.000035746507,0.0007559254,0.0004339242,0.00003650981,0.00030272006,0.49636313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042135,0.000024285973,0.006599317,0.000708401,0.00028326604,0.00014103901,0.00019589465,0.000053877997,0.0015725837],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984396,0.00022764875,0.00038155395,0.00033821017,0.00023532266,0.00037765157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908245,0.00010067813,0.00021381814,0.00033669235,0.00015563556,0.00011073631],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046807353,0.00021414172,0.00023208719,0.00017396681,0.00012679106,0.00004177122,0.00014916572,0.00016738307,0.007130081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017332408,0.00020499043,0.000101147496,0.00022696287,0.0000692853,0.00021189994,0.00003740325,0.00025701022,0.0037014328],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007531842,0.0024236178,0.0041002054,0.00039200162,0.00095477613,0.00057202694,0.2555483,2.4249474e-7,0.020988557,0.031604722,0.0056625307,0.6769998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02139902,0.0026311208,0.14039108,0.0019893595,0.006054448,0.002181981,0.24255252,0.0010712848,0.118092515,0.44704846,0.009950931,0.0066372934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014111887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006888873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67036253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023592846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020407388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005174739","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.1.09cor","title":"Contextualism, minimalism, and situationalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Minimalism (technical communication); Proposition; Utterance; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Relativism; Philosophy; Semantic theory of truth; Value (mathematics); Truth value; Counterexample; Linguistics; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.04304640448116723,"score_gpt":0.2956730208095352,"score_spread":0.252626616328368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005174739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720819,0.0008415875,0.003945349,0.001941958,0.00034843606,0.00045133845,0.000114454146,0.0002507121,0.52002424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961269,0.00005008613,0.0012477337,0.000899615,0.00030636534,0.000019814563,0.0002479276,0.000018316043,0.0010832377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990679,0.000059721842,0.00032399024,0.00013522354,0.00023797597,0.00017517683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988883,0.00040505044,0.00016175256,0.00019744196,0.0002866003,0.000060865383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005386829,0.00012703272,0.00013317165,0.00010611637,0.00029600828,0.00028468476,0.000113100476,0.000045530112,0.0009935698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012700119,0.00011793797,0.000034640358,0.00003606661,0.0003056824,0.00041094638,0.00004774913,0.00011570695,0.00011889202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016205788,0.000072693874,0.000021625814,0.00003851273,0.000036735873,0.0000042185143,0.054536637,3.6655598e-7,0.00035220227,0.9393969,0.0014064652,0.0041174144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033021558,0.00023015354,0.0076151844,0.00038247256,0.00050649355,0.000083337516,0.2769598,0.0007223702,0.0020456794,0.46964434,0.23716423,0.0013437785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005553471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009761653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.524045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016679562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026169007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009926695","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.2.01vil","title":"Revisiting pragmatic abilities in autism spectrum disorders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Implicature; Literal (mathematical logic); Psychology; Linguistics; Literal and figurative language; Metonymy; Grammar; Irony; Pragmatics; Metaphor; Possessive; Class (philosophy); Autism; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019341298104383387,"score_gpt":0.2804843630756579,"score_spread":0.2611430649712745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009926695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707341,0.00011523128,0.0038959868,0.04874025,0.00017372251,0.0027108283,0.00001857085,0.0003626445,0.07324866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.00021845869,0.0009076028,0.0003433861,0.000041271207,0.00042588572,0.000015911904,0.000050500556,0.0003154576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997001,0.0004771519,0.00062497193,0.00051021186,0.0006350931,0.00075159926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982434,0.0010460311,0.00019994081,0.0003833947,0.000009197689,0.00011804841],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052681356,0.00025228653,0.0002890412,0.00037176444,0.00021915442,0.00027389746,0.00032930597,0.00009845805,0.001745558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017163636,0.00025848774,0.0000758537,0.0007428822,0.0002143744,0.0008903151,0.00016327946,0.00048706608,0.0019193932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039009148,0.0009632517,0.0052331374,0.001858221,0.00002441577,0.00004141756,0.007936638,0.00020783025,0.024967724,0.9041462,0.0003248455,0.054257344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000758198,0.00007749169,0.02507023,0.00028481783,0.00001356834,0.00002120107,0.00042955196,0.025936225,0.003895219,0.9429235,0.00020795912,0.00038207453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021928483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001304169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12694742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012773226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072374954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020500505","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin","title":"Out of the Space of Reasons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Common Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Realm; Space (punctuation); Personhood; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer security; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10904715622007047,"score_gpt":0.2552478712419941,"score_spread":0.14620071502192364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020500505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056040313,0.00019888219,0.0006186649,0.00042990188,0.00042694644,0.0001686204,0.000029497056,0.000018676972,0.9420685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972793,0.000075532174,0.0003954895,0.000032407093,0.0000379041,0.000010251363,0.0000024338922,0.0000042477477,0.0021624297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995222,0.000057420642,0.00019932367,0.000039817933,0.00013389798,0.0000473188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991203,0.000095938085,0.00024475643,0.00024802092,0.00028238122,0.000008621345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014941795,0.000044524673,0.00009962655,0.000020755784,0.00010667962,0.0000074124277,0.0001420065,0.000013452685,0.00033200602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000128827,0.000029049037,0.00005073515,0.000023778755,0.00019771396,0.00005554952,0.000066237655,0.000045020828,0.000023712591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008894888,0.00014690963,0.00036568602,0.00004752435,0.00006504676,4.502668e-8,0.14636147,1.5668058e-7,0.000105598876,0.8469295,0.0043206983,0.0016484698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010470782,0.0002580883,0.023495859,0.0006295586,0.0007237789,0.0000021890282,0.13046762,0.00019697195,0.013815072,0.5977186,0.23118974,0.00045546328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035908437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014770216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000038030948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001116771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3635233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023187384","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.01wal","title":"The Carneades model of argument invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Inference; Epistemology; Argument map; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04691921290485994,"score_gpt":0.27177970308648586,"score_spread":0.2248604901816259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023187384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07281073,0.00018140991,0.923811,0.0002209411,0.00033067996,0.00027175082,0.000002786387,0.00004283753,0.00232783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782617,0.000048950165,0.011904377,0.000040241954,0.00005129951,0.00003306432,0.000008386231,0.0000042069773,0.00008331909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.000077868135,0.00026358306,0.00007930006,0.00025934822,0.0001491267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993457,0.00008143133,0.00022477536,0.00020380718,0.00010345748,0.000040821797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006362614,0.000063858446,0.00007307176,0.00003763887,0.00012919215,0.0000522493,0.00015931884,0.000033585024,0.0000027537376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059580918,0.0000469426,0.000042349,0.0000962121,0.0000151202075,0.00046011168,0.000050680523,0.000045834935,0.000031298066],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015091137,0.0007275345,0.0023918212,0.0004539083,0.00012912785,3.1090528e-7,0.012650666,0.0026418339,0.062112153,0.8218233,0.0018208785,0.09523337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471741,0.000024142335,0.0020563789,0.00006693584,0.00002787103,0.0000022979457,0.000111193964,0.9583383,0.01396484,0.02470271,0.00035625757,0.00010190354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000068918735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045797633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95569646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023696217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001610666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19142637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026508940","doi":"10.1075/pc.12.1.11rot","title":"Theory and praxis of metacognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Metacognition; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.032056797429351205,"score_gpt":0.37173431117499817,"score_spread":0.339677513745647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026508940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6073997,0.00010950136,0.34723505,0.00011913952,0.00016209323,0.00016325562,0.00000927148,0.000065014916,0.04473699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705755,0.000007374205,0.028920854,0.00018927337,0.000052213218,0.000025266698,0.000037945727,0.000015731932,0.0001758188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983258,0.0010211645,0.00025337393,0.00015196133,0.00011865032,0.0001290227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899775,0.000502987,0.0001997296,0.000120125966,0.00015323983,0.000026177331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030228468,0.00009628432,0.00015458262,0.0001331682,0.00008108839,0.000012465673,0.000043049124,0.00008156151,0.00028235707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089265394,0.00009083197,0.00003146955,0.0001767309,0.00011588499,0.00007766729,0.00001670179,0.00022798545,0.000062863306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033484603,0.00045397633,0.00036864847,0.00016518275,0.00026486474,0.0000072517028,0.021449434,0.000011071145,0.015118936,0.7615147,0.00008052618,0.20023054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002473719,0.00047157743,0.06575255,0.00025123454,0.00034212123,0.000070830894,0.0036718661,0.00003012028,0.008983898,0.91688126,0.00077154074,0.00029930586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014224282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012814926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36317584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012342136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015671316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37040204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027599522","doi":"10.1075/pc.20.1.03val","title":"On local bars and imported beer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Linguistics; Sentence; Truth condition; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Prima facie; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.020274034048008364,"score_gpt":0.2976193521228441,"score_spread":0.27734531807483576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027599522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8216206,0.0005282496,0.039397933,0.00014226865,0.0008373003,0.000407869,0.000039960578,0.00014531163,0.13688055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974402,0.000021430056,0.00051735743,0.0011709863,0.00022022874,0.000072211194,0.00018815287,0.000025915371,0.00034352348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896,0.00013038678,0.00023385919,0.00017551427,0.00019327042,0.00030696558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993525,0.00017775684,0.00010375913,0.00016412385,0.00007136972,0.00013046137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036356912,0.00014464831,0.00014565248,0.000102657854,0.00008576359,0.000027486702,0.00004513391,0.00013555093,0.0017944913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093275194,0.00013203092,0.0000433467,0.00011571024,0.000074602045,0.0001614771,0.000018558645,0.00017109148,0.0010948434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071277464,0.0034286722,0.0029579839,0.0002935974,0.0007626796,0.00008401818,0.030509897,0.0000038947683,0.003271372,0.27618477,0.021476936,0.6603134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018603297,0.0025273575,0.44840968,0.0008207638,0.0040442087,0.0012431267,0.041886333,0.0022820989,0.014253184,0.44175723,0.02022139,0.003951322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017892651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045800334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6563621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020086345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008112206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031990438","doi":"10.1075/pc.9.2.04ols","title":"What writing is","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Adjunct; Compromise; Linguistics; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Direct speech; Indirect speech; Exploit; Speech act; Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03035789479025274,"score_gpt":0.3469682667578406,"score_spread":0.31661037196758784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031990438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74426746,0.0034530472,0.007872687,0.0016449379,0.0012045846,0.00025779798,0.0000057970146,0.00027261852,0.24102108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97350645,0.00008016874,0.0006791056,0.022416117,0.00035269637,0.000034154094,0.0000885659,0.000022781851,0.002819989],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914306,0.00010469331,0.00022673521,0.00017624276,0.00013382896,0.00021546001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944204,0.00014648229,0.000104037856,0.00016920619,0.00008037919,0.000057870133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026312252,0.000095032854,0.000101215526,0.00009159788,0.00011468061,0.00015378646,0.00006736995,0.000083308965,0.12647058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006143134,0.00010141804,0.000049576814,0.00015688835,0.000024067638,0.00033994653,0.000016459458,0.00017031468,0.0038651088],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012473162,0.00054054277,0.0009948575,0.000099263525,0.00025470526,0.00057485065,0.07768607,0.000007327438,0.0031003035,0.013196305,0.027611261,0.8758098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010459352,0.0006807225,0.061318528,0.0017932766,0.00072915386,0.0036286379,0.5074765,0.0056500332,0.0032153656,0.04085857,0.361476,0.002713836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007116687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016467499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013095619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006381463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039246849","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.1.07rut","title":"On the use and misuse of the “Two Children” brainteaser","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Illusion; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.027197197498866368,"score_gpt":0.28454544594444664,"score_spread":0.2573482484455803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039246849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929424,0.000008047882,0.0000630509,0.0016256714,0.00021675805,0.00024615598,0.000014113945,0.000018100434,0.004865693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805266,0.0000030640313,0.00028401794,0.0012831767,0.000055553643,0.000010853791,0.000009886352,0.000010329796,0.0002904711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994239,0.000100435296,0.000139416,0.00011819716,0.0001187037,0.0000993354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915004,0.00045963013,0.00010552428,0.00020782606,0.000051905772,0.00002506608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023158679,0.00007795221,0.00007110085,0.000023338476,0.00011684537,0.000034648147,0.00009336851,0.000040576313,0.0005626635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056478614,0.000043119653,0.000035323552,0.00006582783,0.00010248696,0.00003277657,0.00003816198,0.0002952228,0.000081323604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032624052,0.0014522534,0.12406751,0.00007230904,0.0005628206,0.000006517525,0.017306186,0.000010483881,0.0313905,0.7413245,0.037454035,0.046026636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063155463,0.000045031295,0.9881525,0.00008616404,0.000052196276,0.00002593811,0.00011051238,0.00006405443,0.0010149353,0.007346996,0.0023644196,0.00010570335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018571287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028831031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86408496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000029556008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001137162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040258355","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.2.06god","title":"A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Defeasible estate; Argumentation theory; Normative; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Foundation (evidence); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05674631934493059,"score_gpt":0.29331665308833654,"score_spread":0.23657033374340597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040258355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47680324,0.00022246181,0.34407997,0.0005941809,0.002485586,0.002154596,0.00023426692,0.00018778948,0.17323789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959156,0.00001469227,0.002566542,0.00015844351,0.0005142558,0.00007860703,0.00032837433,0.000014489051,0.0004089981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.000047220852,0.0003760217,0.00011063618,0.000160036,0.00014437702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886066,0.00047291996,0.00027112814,0.000105008534,0.00025899056,0.000031267886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010233276,0.00009208132,0.000109734334,0.00012577679,0.00017607893,0.000045149543,0.000062185914,0.000043446435,0.00039155825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019035993,0.000090824695,0.00006077782,0.00003357428,0.000096028605,0.00038933358,0.00000908377,0.000053816937,0.000036023306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016102905,0.00022422586,0.000022108927,0.0002974674,0.000049314112,1.4326065e-7,0.027957594,0.0000041989138,0.0017317826,0.93664753,0.0007196698,0.032184955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006110916,0.00014601968,0.0011441235,0.0001255728,0.00017831677,0.000001706877,0.004477778,0.00022955045,0.009508733,0.97851425,0.004904221,0.00015863203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000435427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027844982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51911235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026590997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020798327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42872885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043836746","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.1.11lau","title":"Pragmatics, Pittsburgh style","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.030217415862094366,"score_gpt":0.24760853803667665,"score_spread":0.21739112217458229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043836746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12695295,0.0005590502,0.008906218,0.014290395,0.0027557544,0.0012713842,0.00009797589,0.0008363625,0.8443299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908965,0.00006531739,0.002886582,0.0014683502,0.0027664262,0.000112247646,0.00016240618,0.000038222795,0.0016039509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849033,0.000086526,0.0005203843,0.00023255037,0.0003490211,0.00032115894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886787,0.00019163071,0.0002657906,0.00029969454,0.0002672473,0.00010778582],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003872131,0.00022299089,0.0002125901,0.00015509872,0.00048437933,0.00031663166,0.00018520188,0.00007697947,0.0039137662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021296249,0.00021894161,0.0000869072,0.000064785054,0.00018034878,0.0009408859,0.000043066724,0.00022185799,0.0016053317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023394146,0.0006962488,0.000022397608,0.00021294846,0.00009903322,0.0000023032399,0.060773417,0.000033962016,0.00020079435,0.84701943,0.033436593,0.057479467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009158413,0.00014252531,0.0003202667,0.00025384876,0.00027646864,0.000021240636,0.00528928,0.0038947985,0.00073268474,0.5417213,0.44571105,0.00072073657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018588245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007717924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006508314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053934127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047012610","doi":"10.1075/pc.13.3.06har","title":"Distributed processes, distributed cognizers, and collaborative cognition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Socially distributed cognition; Feeling; Cognitive science; Thinking processes; Process (computing); Need for cognition; Test (biology); Computer science; Turing test; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.013068579044466282,"score_gpt":0.2520850149167202,"score_spread":0.2390164358722539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047012610","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034438014,0.00071758684,0.95702296,0.003904993,0.00016102567,0.0006958939,0.0005078618,0.0005559141,0.0019957721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605427,0.0002826721,0.037641946,0.00039575802,0.000093731855,0.00008374245,0.00093393115,0.00001090664,0.000014610014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848574,0.000103978244,0.00036761654,0.00039535513,0.00032720304,0.0003201165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820447,0.0004078418,0.00023255553,0.00023004565,0.00080855575,0.00011651555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027298802,0.00022238333,0.0002483724,0.00009431135,0.000255685,0.00035148417,0.00026129902,0.00011836704,0.00001756712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009941007,0.00021092776,0.000028252909,0.0008290568,0.0001287542,0.0010168866,0.00013932443,0.00014835023,0.00007299723],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076612225,0.0057537006,0.004081154,0.004719799,0.0016828522,0.0003532462,0.026666706,0.00060925883,0.015485537,0.14837132,0.069245204,0.72226506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021199666,0.0020818044,0.050600745,0.0026815846,0.0020380963,0.0009220369,0.010418505,0.386014,0.1333154,0.3035226,0.08111413,0.0060914475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041668964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056879795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92610466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042926757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014402298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8601384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050367651","doi":"10.1075/pc.15.3.13har","title":"Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autopoiesis; Superordinate goals; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Turing; Metaphor; Cognition; Enactivism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11821899399094947,"score_gpt":0.40231265517869885,"score_spread":0.28409366118774937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050367651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6143014,0.00032953807,0.22914164,0.0022012522,0.0053455937,0.0028914693,0.00008669797,0.0008989772,0.14480345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97165954,0.00006215768,0.026669951,0.00028413488,0.0007054404,0.000061752304,0.00023522116,0.000018862516,0.00030295626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983484,0.000266636,0.00033773892,0.00022112584,0.00033730757,0.00048876903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834746,0.00089365355,0.00019985679,0.00009838909,0.00034148875,0.000119171906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020407238,0.0001448096,0.00018108901,0.000088560766,0.0006725434,0.0000812955,0.00011319545,0.00022925428,0.00014666791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016506218,0.00014279211,0.00008981218,0.00021476863,0.0001467522,0.00031706778,0.0000238306,0.00016497764,0.000056797715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031913887,0.00064528803,0.000091362315,0.0007762746,0.00063221646,0.00009276386,0.31801277,0.00007665793,0.048856787,0.272197,0.003914131,0.3515134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018602556,0.0019004125,0.008195306,0.0008713086,0.0040072664,0.00008545587,0.41632408,0.0037508905,0.045273956,0.44427317,0.053422425,0.0032931736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014329654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023571325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35735813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014814262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082892155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5822893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051971282","doi":"10.1075/pc.17.2.01sta","title":"Perry, Wittgenstein’s builders, and metasemantics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Block (permutation group theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026674861337420124,"score_gpt":0.2311185816114544,"score_spread":0.2044437202740343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051971282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31302026,0.0010496153,0.0039708293,0.021872366,0.00046228452,0.0015393333,0.00030265603,0.00062172196,0.65716094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956381,0.00006867282,0.0018542223,0.0013203227,0.00042627135,0.000020175035,0.00009181305,0.000012963316,0.00056749285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923503,0.00002893117,0.00023499908,0.00017854752,0.00015628908,0.00016618875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.000054366003,0.0001010733,0.00016587341,0.00012251658,0.000074477284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011421835,0.00014270173,0.00015134837,0.000075605734,0.00037804976,0.00021053177,0.000073546646,0.000040148327,0.00026334327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029983039,0.00013394252,0.000046259447,0.000039830476,0.0001522627,0.00023941262,0.000016030224,0.000109591434,0.00013476572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008836193,0.00021156106,0.000003542853,0.00004730502,0.000042118965,0.0000041022977,0.008298911,0.0000014017421,0.0011896994,0.97281873,0.0027151064,0.014658696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012276769,0.0004525309,0.00065217423,0.00018097261,0.0006874049,0.00005791959,0.0042381207,0.0012347497,0.0021409309,0.86632437,0.12198762,0.0008155159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005310995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018656423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6826178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008393528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013296721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54620177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080521047","doi":"10.1075/pc.18.2.05val","title":"Unarticulated comparison classes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Predicate (mathematical logic); Indexicality; Linguistics; Utterance; Perspective (graphical); Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03679927968927353,"score_gpt":0.3006408775835764,"score_spread":0.26384159789430284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080521047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48040476,0.00003407888,0.0005785326,0.0005023739,0.0009891186,0.00014968481,0.000034605207,0.00015097721,0.5171559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972692,0.0000061520554,0.00049671007,0.00019557579,0.00105321,0.000012062232,0.00015823018,0.00001403743,0.0007947904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992438,0.000021063499,0.00027163772,0.00012299645,0.00018486162,0.00015567458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999254,0.00008566202,0.00012379217,0.00015033523,0.0003239906,0.000062225794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013590207,0.00010438834,0.00015255374,0.00007934398,0.0002550012,0.00028882702,0.00007440579,0.000042197164,0.0047326754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023417895,0.00008995768,0.00006691979,0.000036918733,0.00012403619,0.00010430525,0.000020273865,0.00018025633,0.00050088944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009716207,0.00037823437,0.0004533864,0.000044787274,0.00012600211,0.000005966558,0.0064379605,0.000019234953,0.0022793415,0.98270845,0.0049536424,0.0025832718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013834547,0.00018653058,0.0012676636,0.00011929274,0.0020012609,0.000008413075,0.010514633,0.09761928,0.0057337177,0.25432584,0.62576383,0.0010760715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006251172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014246053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051205557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021486152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99617714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100684635","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.2.04poi","title":"A framework for thinking about distributed cognition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cognition; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Fuzzy cognitive map; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive science; Socially distributed cognition; Fuzzy logic; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02292693330644633,"score_gpt":0.28517921364585436,"score_spread":0.262252280339408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100684635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004998746,0.000058867696,0.98723775,0.00094485417,0.00035501245,0.00064415584,0.000074330186,0.00033858142,0.005347714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7539605,0.000011606074,0.24463244,0.00065317296,0.00022404252,0.00016662962,0.00031762887,0.000010895909,0.0000230675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.00005838454,0.00036276126,0.00040328488,0.0004178624,0.00041266324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983135,0.00061081233,0.00023687015,0.0002446535,0.0005273241,0.000066867375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060654717,0.00017639755,0.00017437947,0.00014465256,0.00048732047,0.000505937,0.0004076021,0.000110435634,0.000016570368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006009751,0.00018097309,0.0001039773,0.00060004846,0.00006598469,0.0009087058,0.00012366884,0.00016424186,0.00007532122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016611946,0.00025165253,0.00007095046,0.00014417947,0.000030021469,0.000008665807,0.000687578,0.00005236318,0.0038909204,0.93162537,0.0012595898,0.061962117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048099973,0.000066627,0.002572402,0.0003427174,0.00005609968,0.000012626589,0.000105434236,0.038569,0.0033746145,0.9526088,0.0015298328,0.0002808082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008004699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009850702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74896175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041600328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065657216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7379868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244035841","doi":"10.1075/pc.22.1.04kna","title":"A developmental approach to ancient innovation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Creativity; Scale (ratio); Embodied cognition; Process (computing); Economic geography; Cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; History; Archaeology; Computer science; Geography; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01919202006520681,"score_gpt":0.2037573877328252,"score_spread":0.18456536766761839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244035841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226092,0.000018735745,0.06260654,0.00013834311,0.00007676297,0.00019833996,0.000013360432,0.000033405628,0.114305295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655344,0.000005468047,0.03258409,0.0015130375,0.000039449078,0.000006553454,0.00020835774,0.0000017568213,0.00010691334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933577,0.00003558178,0.00015314957,0.00014836225,0.00016202658,0.00016513735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981385,0.000043603595,0.00004551113,0.00003502865,0.00002035155,0.00004166088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029616785,0.00007595017,0.00007547526,0.000074070245,0.00021626665,0.000010792343,0.00006200397,0.000028541628,0.00021306706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009442712,0.00006610185,0.000011628322,0.0002561205,0.00006911521,0.000091449634,0.000022402446,0.0000552977,0.0007928376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008619583,0.0003041434,0.49766776,0.00011760978,0.00006993177,0.0000021471803,0.0067647677,0.0025878556,0.0020788244,0.010463558,0.0035900366,0.4762672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024877422,0.00010142351,0.9709382,0.00001676529,0.0000132023115,0.000013054183,0.0005083227,0.01010504,0.00043144324,0.007255047,0.010182093,0.000186645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010669506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003397004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47608054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005981919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007201852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254185234","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.02oat","title":"Worlds of the possible","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalization; Empathy; Consciousness; Suite; Narrative; Social worlds; Cognitive science; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Literature; History; Art; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017297946684733674,"score_gpt":0.2816814425742599,"score_spread":0.26438349588952625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254185234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7471908,0.00016327955,0.0021936297,0.00037644533,0.00075503404,0.0005876769,0.000018916478,0.0000573895,0.24865685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957718,0.000007820982,0.00056313525,0.0005456857,0.000103830644,0.00014003279,0.000031140928,0.000015774061,0.0028207467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906653,0.00015614022,0.00027232422,0.00013290026,0.00019828016,0.00017383326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999166,0.00013031124,0.00018591415,0.00028306068,0.00019763225,0.000037076803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018703919,0.00009804423,0.00012496249,0.000065117834,0.00007635226,0.000030829357,0.0001424122,0.00008037835,0.005339919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111321315,0.00006839061,0.000084910454,0.00025349265,0.000074579286,0.00012245258,0.000032891003,0.00013080261,0.0013447698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018761604,0.0034011952,0.008911786,0.0007473193,0.0010615918,0.000016480408,0.051751897,0.000010452056,0.07180394,0.17824788,0.0836923,0.6001675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004281282,0.00036763214,0.35306114,0.00062832725,0.0010523628,0.00010923965,0.017888846,0.0008639297,0.04203999,0.57527107,0.0035081967,0.0009279803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000892581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023657241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5992396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010033005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016487664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289326418","doi":"10.1075/pc.21.3.01ols","title":"Literacy and the languages of rationality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Literacy; Dimension (graph theory); Relation (database); Epistemology; Logical conjunction; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01771214698085294,"score_gpt":0.34987692843289153,"score_spread":0.3321647814520386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289326418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89583117,0.0006592482,0.0022323078,0.019163592,0.00014590456,0.00070011744,0.000005113046,0.00003219222,0.08123035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996768,0.00051895657,0.0020692453,0.00020815631,0.000097781136,0.00006118312,0.00003621583,0.000002038842,0.0002384459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927855,0.0003274817,0.00014258047,0.00004296423,0.0001508524,0.000057552104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987852,0.00074395403,0.00010793772,0.000111457026,0.00022519522,0.000026262409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008416058,0.000029805564,0.000056110868,0.000020278889,0.00021873086,0.0000643008,0.00008031416,0.000025141611,0.0002741579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095295813,0.000021921422,0.000014375059,0.00008427801,0.00025501061,0.00025515357,0.000013529097,0.000042683372,0.000028054843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013645031,0.00014154841,0.0035973212,0.00010888373,0.000029736239,3.606359e-8,0.42728695,0.0000011677702,0.0002430248,0.4859795,0.0023977906,0.08020037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009919784,0.000017690287,0.09213296,0.000114608316,0.00009286851,0.0000011282868,0.057341527,0.001449194,0.0003597862,0.84146655,0.0058752475,0.0001564897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011394692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018931419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36994544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008659455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052203228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30018368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896512482","doi":"10.1075/pc.17013.mar","title":"Embodied concept mapping","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Cognition; Perception; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Psychology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04361702205331579,"score_gpt":0.32623971627669823,"score_spread":0.28262269422338243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896512482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1571309,0.00025686307,0.024740234,0.00045903164,0.0017318293,0.0005329009,0.00006313425,0.00020950573,0.8148756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953758,0.000018391347,0.0013020859,0.0006112175,0.00044877047,0.000104199964,0.00017820195,0.000027435419,0.0019339041],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.00012028683,0.00029573875,0.00026987816,0.00021018506,0.00029338652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872935,0.00010482468,0.0003603585,0.0005602821,0.00016511125,0.000080066995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031729887,0.0001608236,0.0002027032,0.00008497882,0.0005233024,0.0002024209,0.00024245071,0.000139057,0.0026216018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032422532,0.00015819466,0.000088310335,0.000049319577,0.00013443633,0.0002580893,0.000055313543,0.00018745226,0.0019575676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023778455,0.0012271814,0.0016160914,0.0002928463,0.0009423116,0.00032110495,0.052238204,0.000001978522,0.007777377,0.23183663,0.023340292,0.6801682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017033098,0.0006981401,0.22468348,0.001218838,0.0018442748,0.00039141809,0.042711023,0.0016005273,0.011648371,0.6521143,0.042824462,0.003232102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054721644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021209169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8382449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019152467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001792692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121502482","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.1.04mac","title":"Reasoning from paradigms and negative evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.060265549585889686,"score_gpt":0.25863810750957417,"score_spread":0.19837255792368447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121502482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1725124,0.001030536,0.76719785,0.00012665309,0.00033292826,0.000315118,0.0000055135315,0.0002758186,0.058203176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88134044,0.00016902985,0.118211895,0.0001373963,0.00006257359,0.000023868824,0.00000410024,0.0000069575885,0.000043761946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990076,0.00011302367,0.00019317726,0.00031227592,0.00017408365,0.00019985178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889237,0.0004651549,0.0001513304,0.00025980192,0.00012938294,0.000101968195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002830134,0.00013364051,0.00014811548,0.000052297113,0.00015056525,0.0001444899,0.00028942854,0.000063932705,0.00004980116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007053892,0.00012016382,0.000031611464,0.00017531868,0.00007278196,0.00091170275,0.00016347837,0.00012574097,0.00014324827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000807981,0.00046511958,0.010866158,0.00017178724,0.00020643964,0.00010575606,0.121948026,0.000003125706,0.002402385,0.62230176,0.0011411298,0.24030754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000881751,0.00032405945,0.086929895,0.0011421215,0.00014771061,0.000054281252,0.0005821066,0.09326679,0.0140565,0.8015887,0.00032188342,0.0007041738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093489856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029758852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70882803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019745901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038161754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49001384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123209816","doi":"10.1075/pc.14.1.03wal","title":"Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Argumentation theory; Conversation; Computer science; Persuasion; Equivocation; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Vagueness; Transitive relation; Epistemology; The Internet; Negotiation; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Management science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Sociology; Fuzzy logic; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07546235976159879,"score_gpt":0.31612151839266284,"score_spread":0.24065915863106405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123209816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42151433,0.000010737738,0.5779064,0.00012014728,0.00006276735,0.0002906174,0.0000023188193,0.000014846991,0.000077785226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95731854,0.000006833177,0.042569254,0.000038480004,0.000031046024,0.000015266829,0.0000151333,0.0000038202884,0.0000016187104],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.000046547724,0.0004174314,0.00015649709,0.00019584913,0.000112805814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949175,0.000053791275,0.00021410905,0.00009824181,0.0001176122,0.000024514218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035816134,0.00007517219,0.00010911553,0.00019359849,0.000046782185,0.000056858215,0.000073591946,0.000039800332,0.0000029829584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047321526,0.00008123828,0.000015660238,0.00029735357,0.000017210332,0.00040781585,0.00003927928,0.00003862279,0.000006019244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043683074,0.0008648164,0.012731884,0.0011428313,0.00003485833,0.000003525106,0.041814342,0.0401108,0.5433528,0.26640132,0.000062691564,0.09343644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019272813,0.00007522424,0.036142655,0.000261967,0.000017422492,0.00000444114,0.0005651217,0.8042382,0.07772847,0.08058339,0.000007920752,0.00018245583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096558925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004526419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000490918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021062318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33128008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404877463","doi":"10.1075/pc.24039.olk","title":"Training studies provide new insights about mechanisms of irony development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Irony; Training (meteorology); Psychology; Art; Literature; Geography","score_opus":0.09439507786787515,"score_gpt":0.352955237888043,"score_spread":0.25856016002016785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404877463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6357425,0.039304048,0.077337585,0.0027963025,0.017268408,0.0067423666,0.00014020645,0.0019088215,0.21875976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94459623,0.00019493184,0.050796464,0.00025819556,0.0003427323,0.000255899,0.00026966917,0.00008946097,0.0031964115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739325,0.00013403606,0.0009980769,0.0006807907,0.00045764723,0.0003361913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862033,0.00020111889,0.00055895257,0.00029281038,0.00021414996,0.00011262154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048570003,0.00044336598,0.0006974216,0.00031624132,0.00011281171,0.0000744167,0.00022961019,0.00032445096,0.0003025432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022854985,0.00040746407,0.00014702552,0.00016069131,0.00006651644,0.00003603766,0.000679533,0.00090553396,0.00052348693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012527763,0.00042164282,0.000016085454,0.005718443,0.003967773,0.00010937913,0.42484507,0.00007184931,0.0020689126,0.10951366,0.0057603084,0.4473816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013687524,0.00028671607,0.005037342,0.014890189,0.0012082013,0.00004368051,0.020200573,0.00019779545,0.0058109313,0.9139677,0.035400763,0.0015873297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012503854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030272777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013705528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070284505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}