{"meta":{"query_hash":"35806e15b583","filters":{"venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/35806e15b583","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Presidential+Studies+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2008865813","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03692.x","title":"The Law: Presidential Proclamation 6920: Using Executive Power to Set a New Direction for the Management of National Monuments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Presidential system; Political science; Delegation; Public administration; Law; Executive power; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Executive branch; Veto; Agency (philosophy); Separation of powers; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07674447495653182,"score_gpt":0.416195859362648,"score_spread":0.3394513844061162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008865813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8535265,0.0047004814,0.054086663,0.046440948,0.007250901,0.016380794,0.00008124825,0.00032496266,0.017207524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972095,0.00001699432,0.00017468889,0.00011262084,0.00046340397,0.0001273628,0.0000019809127,0.000006321313,0.0018871442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982784,0.00015870747,0.00037485512,0.00018688376,0.0006746793,0.0003264707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990209,0.0002458977,0.00017106737,0.00010494677,0.00038219002,0.000075006334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007266692,0.00010778885,0.00014454543,0.000030254052,0.0013053669,0.00016329136,0.00019007335,0.000043057793,0.000008385853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075321084,0.00007609069,0.00008795674,0.00019654781,0.0000929936,0.0002778297,0.000020140838,0.000046259625,0.0000070381993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083067815,0.0002096962,0.00052893884,0.00015914072,0.00171468,0.0000018621116,0.16540226,0.0009927906,0.0025983027,0.7476355,0.060890015,0.019036133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004597852,0.004437636,0.09226384,0.0010375001,0.0016446527,0.000003765348,0.08345081,0.0020275423,0.0062014037,0.68136424,0.12136431,0.0016064515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009763254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009007064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.143683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002134662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060135935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508403","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00007.x","title":"Projecting Presidential Personas on the Radio: An Addendum on the Bushes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Political science; Persona; Public administration; Law; Art; Art history; Politics; Humanities","score_opus":0.4336227091230434,"score_gpt":0.37222727725330157,"score_spread":0.061395431869741834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030508403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95517987,0.0044890814,0.000011052246,0.012133036,0.0034071866,0.0012853752,0.000025381023,0.00026945156,0.02319955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881802,0.00013568613,0.000011048179,0.0013237052,0.0023491422,0.00070576865,0.000002608931,0.0000419479,0.007249893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960839,0.0010428238,0.0005200862,0.00088441104,0.00065743295,0.00081135525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976272,0.0010699059,0.0002444816,0.0008410467,0.000117576004,0.000099764184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006809893,0.00049922353,0.0004560787,0.00007012681,0.0018874992,0.0002500704,0.0008839854,0.00016119787,0.0051529454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013733808,0.0002512254,0.00029000497,0.00028975823,0.0005790275,0.00017008345,0.00009505466,0.0007105478,0.0018476718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006956314,0.0016465858,0.003925494,0.000024992878,0.0015849503,0.00018015086,0.15112936,0.0000034814536,0.0003162723,0.019166566,0.7465758,0.07475073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005176039,0.027437009,0.49047413,0.00047804308,0.0014677979,0.00013926881,0.39349732,0.00009183155,0.0006970802,0.015296044,0.061749656,0.0034957745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007972374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073243567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68482614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053681302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046088485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045058034","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02609.x","title":"The Contemporary Presidency: Who Wants Presidential Supremacy? Findings from the Institutions of American Democracy Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidency; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Ideology; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09407801719163439,"score_gpt":0.41117716123608095,"score_spread":0.31709914404444656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045058034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834472,0.0037178083,0.00062622357,0.005310316,0.0012172387,0.0013633341,0.000048310245,0.00008753408,0.004182016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975041,0.00013107952,0.000038171693,0.00012072568,0.0010752579,0.00007278439,0.0000058484884,0.000016757065,0.0010352643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618185,0.0007907608,0.0009376878,0.00036279194,0.000958827,0.00076807616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585205,0.0027855146,0.0004175605,0.00039815338,0.00040358907,0.00014312651],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019451864,0.00022859532,0.0004305442,0.00005957695,0.0028586895,0.00025024478,0.0007010442,0.00008650309,0.000025207404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010760393,0.00015079146,0.00019755306,0.00051939883,0.00227478,0.00054623134,0.00009002086,0.0002433229,0.0000362044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088431523,0.0003101816,0.43206054,0.00011831348,0.0016291472,0.000040997376,0.21327549,0.000010359148,0.0030822938,0.11878677,0.22024271,0.009558869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012592298,0.0009153472,0.85595363,0.00038514406,0.00041816657,0.0000025309942,0.055619802,0.000023478095,0.003133963,0.0416947,0.03984968,0.0007443172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28195193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26861697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4238931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013109634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053384155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059448304","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02666.x","title":"George Akerson's Legacy: Continuity and Change in White House Press Operations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Outreach; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.09835431921463739,"score_gpt":0.36852725514648527,"score_spread":0.2701729359318479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059448304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941271,0.0016678097,0.00003042518,0.0023691328,0.0003197589,0.0005448364,0.0000060235493,0.0000924963,0.00084243924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979354,0.00018046355,0.000025079036,0.00009138335,0.00054148556,0.0001776337,0.0000011418326,0.000010462326,0.0010369299],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985467,0.00032733384,0.00025273167,0.00021960666,0.0002565862,0.00039703137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.00009016176,0.000043185144,0.00010157497,0.00011179214,0.000117354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003516744,0.00010888698,0.00023303943,0.000044112385,0.0006487328,0.000117017975,0.00009286012,0.00006881304,0.000025861666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111450594,0.00010473373,0.00003605126,0.00012317978,0.0003128136,0.00076445384,0.000024876374,0.00009587488,0.000019936087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043782005,0.00015281282,0.34203476,0.00007031955,0.000096913915,0.000047265752,0.623988,0.0000064467126,0.00012711136,0.027105216,0.0033295474,0.0029978452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091514376,0.00032258706,0.98042375,0.00007382307,0.000049560393,0.0000037738441,0.008954838,0.00012276028,0.0000560451,0.0011005771,0.0075904657,0.00038667157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16567923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43617365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.638389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006578348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032988446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8398766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04610514520876348,"score_gpt":0.2807071089102456,"score_spread":0.23460196370148212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077002469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.417416,0.18480371,0.00032824103,0.008273132,0.007191564,0.0006752269,0.000016153497,0.0009828439,0.38031313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92305917,0.00020856627,0.00006064418,0.00004096856,0.001138593,0.00011878604,0.000007319832,0.000019404133,0.07534655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825495,0.00014201735,0.00062333606,0.00030623114,0.0003304835,0.00034298867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.000124626,0.00017107178,0.00032053897,0.00015407792,0.000034757806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021904103,0.0002231927,0.00040219125,0.00026247112,0.0006335393,0.00017997425,0.00029662848,0.000043048043,0.00038996636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020335201,0.00020692126,0.00012560202,0.0001215585,0.00019640873,0.0003914661,0.0000837788,0.00017460156,0.00008519412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011669155,0.0005745937,0.01770184,0.00007353896,0.00039099494,0.00004550009,0.25147074,0.00005559835,0.000033261862,0.24128698,0.4364246,0.051825635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016302455,0.00046643763,0.099892765,0.00015574662,0.00016443332,0.000006290149,0.02790612,0.000045407363,0.00002091224,0.036257364,0.8325647,0.00088959455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021055087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03020124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5056432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005131215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020464884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98749506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086851228","doi":"10.1111/psq.12163","title":"No End Save Victory: How FDR Led the Nation into War. By DavidKaiser. New York: Basic Books, 2014. 408 pp.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; Citation; Classics; History; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.022166606567590303,"score_gpt":0.2706024242281873,"score_spread":0.248435817660597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086851228","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043558307,0.45455164,0.003338023,0.19481139,0.035871997,0.006232289,0.00008294686,0.0021339809,0.25941944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457104,0.0015512174,0.000103748185,0.0005949174,0.004216065,0.00017295901,0.000015223652,0.00003854018,0.047596917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968173,0.00077555946,0.0003445461,0.0005532325,0.00093302986,0.00057636155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.00019919114,0.00028817836,0.00037346358,0.00036275486,0.00017132428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010857631,0.00035314445,0.00047070868,0.00003382932,0.0047018058,0.00023706761,0.00064817624,0.00014445033,0.00024775637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048179898,0.00026216192,0.00021818637,0.00019209734,0.00091730605,0.00055707316,0.00009280235,0.00027412467,0.00041685198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034504177,0.000031109765,0.00013494678,0.000025547306,0.0002570288,0.0000012472296,0.23351355,7.258575e-7,0.0003507653,0.0028302257,0.7516527,0.0111676315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109992,0.0002752671,0.0004322789,0.000038218066,0.00016229661,5.0410307e-7,0.079247735,0.000007200636,0.000045339442,0.005135221,0.9137971,0.0003478724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003746452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041527398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024737668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011979517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121105972","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00270.x","title":"Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Polling; Presidential system; Democracy; Cash; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Politics; Finance; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.042938259867796764,"score_gpt":0.3602472136261893,"score_spread":0.3173089537583925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121105972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99275184,0.0013321221,0.00090591365,0.0023434465,0.0007449255,0.0005936494,0.0000074708573,0.00006777018,0.0012528878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966014,0.000018222781,0.00009233764,0.000032071148,0.0021235857,0.00007947933,0.0000017429758,0.000014783594,0.0010363444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765146,0.00043515358,0.0005681239,0.00024481275,0.000633899,0.00046658074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863714,0.00034076395,0.00029573246,0.00021319205,0.000421229,0.000091956164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011451141,0.00015009308,0.00026647127,0.000070902985,0.00066631107,0.00018162974,0.00031011496,0.00009487375,0.00009982636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032413268,0.00011465044,0.00012383352,0.00023358365,0.00034370442,0.0006174341,0.00004650527,0.00011917969,0.000067641166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035731745,0.00042610103,0.046484802,0.00037947024,0.00084668526,0.000007607713,0.32765645,0.00021381656,0.007048765,0.08749875,0.011488557,0.51759166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007112914,0.0048188884,0.7479609,0.00096911873,0.002244063,0.00001154097,0.06529786,0.006748647,0.022760987,0.10264845,0.035748594,0.0036780278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02404648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045448963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011716595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084201776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98245245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133804459","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03992.x","title":"Politics or Policy? How Rhetoric Matters to Presidential Leadership of Congress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Political science; Legislation; Appeal; Politics; Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.17777757210934672,"score_gpt":0.4137089684351728,"score_spread":0.23593139632582608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133804459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92674315,0.001805065,0.00054662046,0.06167323,0.0056590536,0.0014210959,0.000046890127,0.00019671507,0.0019081997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875209,0.000014475354,0.00006496077,0.00057871063,0.0037816956,0.00007609854,0.000002044351,0.000021876944,0.007939289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686,0.000539096,0.0004399984,0.00023157625,0.00072879903,0.0012005267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839675,0.0004029347,0.00019047646,0.000227583,0.00029201843,0.0004902371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000648803,0.0002023566,0.00042472617,0.00017723195,0.00047458135,0.00013495116,0.00030202323,0.00011992499,0.000123532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063303934,0.00017633209,0.00012403859,0.00043307926,0.0003903008,0.00059700373,0.000050314375,0.000107344495,0.00010638867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003564189,0.00051946373,0.054839004,0.0011711034,0.0011200455,0.000014781433,0.37193108,0.000012449645,0.004411457,0.34668505,0.21492004,0.004019089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051721702,0.0065777767,0.32612374,0.0015967634,0.0018658246,0.000025998042,0.34175843,0.000025369472,0.025630655,0.028918236,0.25759026,0.0047147954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03213715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015450138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31776682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024976794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015888443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97430795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154288493","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03893.x","title":"Remaking the Presidency: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson, 1901‐1916 – By Peri E. Arnold","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Citation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049804686741709375,"score_gpt":0.31380576948116523,"score_spread":0.2640010827394559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154288493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22840133,0.052149132,0.0016577309,0.010906258,0.002755699,0.001511106,0.00010770524,0.0004556017,0.70205545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316764,0.00076908147,0.00021701638,0.00039005844,0.0005204903,0.00005035116,0.0000016385625,0.000012661686,0.0048710764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980755,0.00031583422,0.00030662,0.0003216685,0.00046166885,0.00051871705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.0003272816,0.00016165951,0.0002209328,0.00017756548,0.00013394521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053205487,0.00019109361,0.00025215966,0.000033607397,0.001769202,0.00014546233,0.00036414195,0.00007408448,0.00016978155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002157041,0.00014657255,0.00008015263,0.00013893243,0.0024968933,0.00041291612,0.00008285299,0.00016608629,0.000033491597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041502833,0.000060866572,0.0060684187,0.00003367267,0.00034113287,0.00002279243,0.12354741,3.791795e-7,0.00008269258,0.8111671,0.050539296,0.008094735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007178255,0.00064245926,0.04614749,0.00017065025,0.00047511613,0.000027939188,0.12473744,0.000009706684,0.00016438613,0.057445973,0.7683883,0.0010727461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020497937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009227994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006547943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027894927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2835894000","doi":"10.1111/psq.12464","title":"The Diversity of Unilateral Presidential Orders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03119393008496603,"score_gpt":0.3362892602455776,"score_spread":0.3050953301606116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2835894000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616737,0.0015041674,0.00081410893,0.0038547856,0.0042168447,0.0005172973,0.00003114213,0.00012618437,0.12726176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995538,0.00013957571,0.000054944343,0.000077707096,0.00089522457,0.0000050552903,8.056587e-7,0.0000041655767,0.0032845067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.00024319919,0.00023069423,0.00015847584,0.00049422024,0.0003560669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988596,0.00032294693,0.00014042799,0.00016206503,0.0004383843,0.00007656899],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042481234,0.000096898344,0.00016167831,0.000028462635,0.0037118641,0.00006489184,0.00042554262,0.000043515352,0.00010362432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016551955,0.00007600126,0.00009259814,0.00014250292,0.0052032718,0.00020991392,0.00018208848,0.000070972186,0.000037801226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000888908,0.000030658335,0.008647424,0.000012199166,0.0003406936,0.0000045902248,0.039389238,0.000001369439,0.000042496496,0.9334533,0.015669027,0.0023200954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013341384,0.0015090394,0.054610882,0.00009025292,0.0005148137,0.0000047381036,0.1095214,0.000015481948,0.0005020946,0.07286175,0.75822747,0.0008079131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026523016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028834786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056515484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030162276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339222831","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x","title":"“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Political science; Character (mathematics); Persona; Law; Linguistics; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08396634978852817,"score_gpt":0.26788132284603405,"score_spread":0.18391497305750587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339222831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34240818,0.33718306,0.000040616404,0.1174032,0.005675967,0.005231443,0.000057011126,0.0007284764,0.19127205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635191,0.009047559,0.000008129392,0.00038956382,0.00092926394,0.00048262958,0.0000016015657,0.000031798027,0.025590342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973152,0.00086118997,0.000533817,0.000326572,0.00051816157,0.00044501422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957446,0.0025755623,0.0002996883,0.0011103078,0.00022190358,0.000047937858],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089510175,0.00034519206,0.0004242476,0.000046190846,0.009184196,0.0010459189,0.0010765246,0.000044832275,0.00028809503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020520174,0.00016500092,0.00021939843,0.00007904219,0.0030885553,0.00027636398,0.00041234505,0.00045376466,0.00013637988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024952323,0.0000710342,0.00025578972,0.000039498005,0.0016379176,0.0000051803113,0.54773396,9.443013e-7,0.0000028991617,0.2186256,0.20764746,0.023730153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027158558,0.0005904212,0.0011988541,0.00015464103,0.0005518628,0.000030441888,0.37849265,0.00046827502,0.00001625744,0.009776698,0.6053795,0.00062449387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017969147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057453383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6211109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057425852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010326485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213240781","doi":"10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00229.x","title":"The Legacy of John Adams","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04227632875375947,"score_gpt":0.3253315176716337,"score_spread":0.28305518891787423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213240781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08893117,0.030303843,0.00033576897,0.011291822,0.002410425,0.00042693844,0.000017912771,0.000112959446,0.86616915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126005,0.0009978681,0.000043759686,0.000079930425,0.00045778294,0.000011671719,2.5980563e-7,0.000003490644,0.007145185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.00015292648,0.00021111063,0.000103069775,0.000358963,0.0002650688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908656,0.00046301947,0.00010162244,0.0001293132,0.00016358316,0.000055882712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002555779,0.00006985149,0.00013361352,0.000017567487,0.0011760158,0.00007238324,0.00024278794,0.000026504556,0.00019123519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017581075,0.000051274325,0.0000771395,0.0001157218,0.001902897,0.0001973397,0.000022094058,0.00006250722,0.00006120504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000553643,0.000022769436,0.00037136365,0.0000059404847,0.00010464559,0.0000026630732,0.014213328,0.0000014284487,0.000010130713,0.94929594,0.024455879,0.011510405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019925421,0.00018206962,0.001329689,0.000020297854,0.000062536295,0.0000014523117,0.060655925,0.000009949079,0.000028036819,0.0077158576,0.92963547,0.00015948809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004139927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040886095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94158006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029321998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008801149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9045082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323925465","doi":"10.1111/psq.12823","title":"Managing our SOBs: Washington's response to friendly dictators in trouble","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Argument (complex analysis); White (mutation); Political science; Political economy; Foreign policy; Law and economics; Law; Development economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.031303022166940045,"score_gpt":0.3768631547745976,"score_spread":0.34556013260765756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323925465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95069194,0.00017576705,0.00031454925,0.015595475,0.00080682157,0.00057050213,0.000011950704,0.00025009664,0.031582884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907382,0.00007369238,0.000101324615,0.00012429606,0.0003568565,0.00013576978,0.0000024610317,0.000014890722,0.008452504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981896,0.00026059075,0.00029234975,0.0002642133,0.00051550067,0.00047771705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993355,0.0002442177,0.000065483975,0.0001349389,0.00011501404,0.00010482404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001327742,0.00011637343,0.0001735382,0.00048468006,0.0005924529,0.0001550206,0.00030718368,0.00005548213,0.000032173553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054488896,0.00012037977,0.00007843845,0.00083332387,0.00006382876,0.00037329143,0.00007367207,0.00011816513,0.00064687064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006865003,0.00008643975,0.007972209,0.000029512634,0.00027079138,0.00016788256,0.5397482,0.00062278495,0.0003421602,0.3710044,0.05919632,0.019872839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013797344,0.00068432034,0.12545659,0.0001975277,0.000050360606,0.0000016251979,0.54133916,0.00036668018,0.00007144525,0.2495659,0.08019827,0.000688374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004061087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006164026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121438496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023733459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008116547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8314429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390946246","doi":"10.1111/psq.12867","title":"The president and the vice president: Different types of partnerships for a unique power couple","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Vice president; Typology; General partnership; Power (physics); Political science; Administration (probate law); Executive power; Principal (computer security); Inherent powers; Public relations; Public administration; Management; Sociology; Law; Politics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07834875492056055,"score_gpt":0.41579845292638734,"score_spread":0.3374496980058268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390946246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643758,0.12266913,0.0023541264,0.27940315,0.0033741205,0.008159695,0.00016791369,0.0004419141,0.019054143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922264,0.0019709237,0.000010146326,0.00007196163,0.00031520298,0.000401948,0.0000015104557,0.000011106779,0.004990807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784625,0.0005718587,0.00036293158,0.00025039935,0.00056118995,0.00040737863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952979,0.0040581673,0.00009494301,0.00021285101,0.00024094255,0.000095187286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021552949,0.00013683733,0.00023290177,0.000050298702,0.0012958335,0.00065469375,0.00042317688,0.00006290871,0.000036088284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000901847,0.000074254654,0.00012925026,0.00016803209,0.0014846001,0.000244676,0.00008008495,0.0001502716,0.0000056970784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002807065,0.00003055687,0.000115113944,0.00014269633,0.0004781989,0.0000024722387,0.05544905,0.0000012478654,0.000053011823,0.9260613,0.015033599,0.0023520992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025441963,0.0011104561,0.009163095,0.00035666805,0.0004490229,0.0000059867552,0.11930082,0.0009913453,0.0011555061,0.5358758,0.32848135,0.0005657731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016667391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017003633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42785057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042640688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023326384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}