{"meta":{"query_hash":"35806e15b583","filters":{"venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/35806e15b583","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Presidential+Studies+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2008865813","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2009.03692.x","title":"The Law: Presidential Proclamation 6920: Using Executive Power to Set a New Direction for the Management of National Monuments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Presidential system; Political science; Delegation; Public administration; Law; Executive power; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Executive branch; Veto; Agency (philosophy); Separation of powers; Constitution; Legislature; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07674447495653182,"score_gpt":0.416195859362648,"score_spread":0.3394513844061162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008865813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041182045,0.005319767,0.0041905423,0.25284684,0.0020099827,0.000061529165,0.00016718058,0.00011272482,0.69410944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7775773,0.0023710749,0.0025746087,0.114095114,0.002615447,0.00020735152,0.0001092226,0.000064939326,0.10038486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435705,0.0020034267,0.00037454555,0.0007832609,0.0012050902,0.001276629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952679,0.002289308,0.0010529755,0.0003824776,0.0006671943,0.00034012517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005901802,0.00031326295,0.0002535634,0.00073219667,0.0081604775,0.012162554,0.0010954854,0.008783492,0.0037217848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011176908,0.00041077044,0.00024567425,0.0011396701,0.019801246,0.0048979633,0.0038126442,0.007424405,0.00094637927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014167879,0.000011704391,0.0010006748,0.000028339176,0.0000035269497,0.00007696902,0.0044417297,0.00004798127,0.00021060441,0.90439236,0.084983304,0.004788537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034184068,0.000058684658,0.010475938,0.0002992853,0.000020309752,0.00031273253,0.0046595973,0.00033766564,0.0014116975,0.07344489,0.9088652,0.00007976813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03285758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04927323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03285758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048492714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052281544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06533265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508403","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00007.x","title":"Projecting Presidential Personas on the Radio: An Addendum on the Bushes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Behavioral and Psychological Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Political science; Persona; Public administration; Law; Art; Art history; Politics; Humanities","score_opus":0.4336227091230434,"score_gpt":0.37222727725330157,"score_spread":0.061395431869741834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030508403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09995542,0.04602092,0.02406379,0.31248492,0.048996564,0.0002543049,0.0033625509,0.00068915694,0.4641724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39670548,0.14342931,0.06913157,0.031756792,0.08328601,0.0007044514,0.0069307927,0.0017265662,0.26632896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991223,0.00034166797,0.00004104239,0.000064612344,0.00032122363,0.00010914034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913898,0.0041275043,0.0003046923,0.0009977549,0.0024401934,0.0007400962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031354856,0.0006195221,0.00043576697,0.002171901,0.003713491,0.0064661605,0.001183344,0.0011370552,0.029128842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012704255,0.00044209458,0.00050400384,0.0029106778,0.0012272934,0.007535618,0.0035798703,0.0032926227,0.005944199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010888534,0.00016740593,0.009837673,0.00033847097,0.000024764917,0.0001449162,0.0060838116,0.00026056357,0.0007197963,0.051667605,0.51520896,0.41543704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012856376,0.000068093825,0.019543463,0.0003697411,0.000050655177,0.00016378725,0.009280613,0.00049031107,0.0007833494,0.013119128,0.95606816,0.000049876504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097270375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04665911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029128842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012248346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026330224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09744573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045058034","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02609.x","title":"The Contemporary Presidency: Who Wants Presidential Supremacy? Findings from the Institutions of American Democracy Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidency; Political science; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Ideology; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09407801719163439,"score_gpt":0.41117716123608095,"score_spread":0.31709914404444656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045058034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97915936,0.00028435612,0.00007689247,0.008072314,0.000016177379,0.000009147492,0.00016006416,0.0000028351476,0.012218755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807703,0.00021445451,0.00003831239,0.0006642684,0.000039576913,0.000021688304,0.00019115717,0.000004620446,0.00074875075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969818,0.0017546325,0.00013332465,0.00024118202,0.0004124472,0.0004766359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97480154,0.011899625,0.007598682,0.00083949947,0.001984235,0.0028764198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008668766,0.00010887013,0.0003200065,0.0012256948,0.0021153088,0.0039948253,0.00077308237,0.0012736098,0.0058918083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874556,0.0001661739,0.00017852832,0.002266952,0.0030270158,0.0028102146,0.0024688786,0.002512454,0.0007277767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017598619,0.0004882807,0.8572501,0.00011989227,0.0000707415,0.00012837099,0.087632336,0.00015129693,0.00026556654,0.012363869,0.014552771,0.026800793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014710965,0.00006346636,0.8524207,0.000079342186,0.000023962728,0.00005716924,0.13451792,0.00021758313,0.0001226119,0.002286978,0.010181071,0.000014493518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007662477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016562797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008668766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011327902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010548095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04584539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059448304","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02666.x","title":"George Akerson's Legacy: Continuity and Change in White House Press Operations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Outreach; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.09835431921463739,"score_gpt":0.36852725514648527,"score_spread":0.2701729359318479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059448304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17435639,0.022728665,0.0037112418,0.4978995,0.0041215243,0.000024021614,0.00024755334,0.00017208372,0.29673904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884485,0.008051124,0.0015936781,0.017280646,0.0022194672,0.000021563654,0.00008850023,0.00013706215,0.08215946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996644,0.0013270399,0.00013202705,0.00066420523,0.00072688743,0.00050587446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923206,0.0036823442,0.0008891392,0.0009500305,0.0008549407,0.001303072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052251252,0.00013838215,0.00018841261,0.0013614492,0.006438017,0.013455332,0.0010389913,0.0021083723,0.005734046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146621,0.00028786584,0.00012544572,0.0024808946,0.010217928,0.008021307,0.004094654,0.0034939009,0.00076436193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074346186,0.00007495623,0.009915509,0.00009566571,0.000020442938,0.000680283,0.076888114,0.00022781585,0.00022776806,0.5932672,0.19668365,0.12184431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007656421,0.000024402654,0.008705564,0.00016301137,0.000009250754,0.00028305346,0.023223935,0.00013275728,0.00033849519,0.030788599,0.9362957,0.000027640152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027455153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041206878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027455153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040916335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051838644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054590702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04610514520876348,"score_gpt":0.2807071089102456,"score_spread":0.23460196370148212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077002469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90981007,0.019960362,0.00060214614,0.0044643106,0.00024131265,0.000057689354,0.0034982024,0.00006208957,0.06130383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840605,0.006288012,0.00034766854,0.0005935546,0.0003443304,0.00003776617,0.0018769715,0.00002556752,0.006425652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805033,0.00041354203,0.00025503582,0.000389397,0.00051778875,0.0003738937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840776,0.0051314044,0.005873419,0.00042167815,0.0033675642,0.0011283606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026877285,0.00022396108,0.00031923188,0.0067583146,0.0018941595,0.0035420305,0.00050871406,0.0010429487,0.0039272755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012795771,0.0003932881,0.00017690564,0.009094933,0.0019297786,0.0025530462,0.0017817562,0.00183913,0.0011118053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064885063,0.00022553193,0.6662187,0.0011087834,0.000108260734,0.000900668,0.09798,0.00053400535,0.0029014135,0.029407015,0.024749694,0.17521702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068280015,0.000099688164,0.8282557,0.00020045324,0.000019578836,0.0003997224,0.012411003,0.00014597226,0.0013626947,0.00042269035,0.15664338,0.000032330045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029231565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054484148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029231565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039089224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009989657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058122873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086851228","doi":"10.1111/psq.12163","title":"No End Save Victory: How FDR Led the Nation into War. By DavidKaiser. New York: Basic Books, 2014. 408 pp.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential system; Citation; Classics; History; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.022166606567590303,"score_gpt":0.2706024242281873,"score_spread":0.248435817660597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086851228","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015008987,0.703079,0.0007421677,0.18330978,0.010759846,0.000029711831,0.00030432068,0.00012854689,0.10014576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06303415,0.43659377,0.001556581,0.031763528,0.0036008577,0.00009344868,0.00042051726,0.0002893805,0.46264783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947554,0.00022908347,0.000022552056,0.000046905796,0.0001057343,0.000120349745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995616,0.00016731411,0.000046218345,0.000013179892,0.00009800561,0.00011370173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010799689,0.00091046066,0.0003144835,0.001010234,0.0035725164,0.004707919,0.0009698606,0.0019596384,0.034726776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024182308,0.0005630927,0.00028863424,0.0013247278,0.0028736072,0.0063372157,0.0017757363,0.0029231578,0.00722854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016558277,0.000015183141,0.00024185074,0.00028546815,0.0000046717237,0.00008503924,0.003447341,0.000060489674,0.000043975502,0.0189307,0.8951339,0.08173488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036261456,0.0000074350837,0.0004872477,0.00061086,0.0000027674694,0.00010360537,0.0042890212,0.00003630764,0.000054353946,0.0053851814,0.9890132,0.0000063110547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06258222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14582661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06258222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004710802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005285572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1244359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121105972","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00270.x","title":"Do Early Birds Get the Worm? Improving Timeliness of Presidential Nomination Forecasts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Polling; Presidential system; Democracy; Cash; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Politics; Finance; Geography; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.042938259867796764,"score_gpt":0.3602472136261893,"score_spread":0.3173089537583925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121105972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721513,0.0008040764,0.008123219,0.0021331897,0.00016914014,0.000038607075,0.0015590714,0.00031169623,0.014709727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519324,0.00018653963,0.0024262497,0.00011328571,0.000121115045,0.000012949886,0.00082885195,0.000027572542,0.001090101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833375,0.0008058952,0.00010806971,0.00031466267,0.00026579938,0.00017192158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96952146,0.017901253,0.0069377827,0.0019946392,0.002471012,0.0011738427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004617782,0.00035640737,0.00049739075,0.001633194,0.00059453177,0.0020748037,0.0004740766,0.0007670325,0.0050867246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043859202,0.00024869014,0.00022431303,0.0012137416,0.00022794417,0.0029420601,0.0005270565,0.0008664341,0.0019221362],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009639417,0.00019908762,0.75466704,0.0001348134,0.00014719459,0.0000841895,0.0012751569,0.008488008,0.0013988601,0.0012452331,0.0068841404,0.22451234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059975817,0.00075410807,0.9345102,0.00014263048,0.00010106833,0.00015491682,0.0024101834,0.04159047,0.0024812603,0.003869829,0.013844975,0.0000803701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074885474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016517228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074885474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056449685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005361793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024421453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133804459","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.03992.x","title":"Politics or Policy? How Rhetoric Matters to Presidential Leadership of Congress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Legislature; Political science; Legislation; Appeal; Politics; Public administration; Agency (philosophy); Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.17777757210934672,"score_gpt":0.4137089684351728,"score_spread":0.23593139632582608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133804459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86849576,0.00343526,0.0029546919,0.028057087,0.0002239195,0.00003502239,0.0002163501,0.000045558172,0.096536316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974516,0.00049080735,0.00026869006,0.0005888672,0.00027327577,0.000014540684,0.00004748807,0.000018109693,0.0008466245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900851,0.006395219,0.00028377734,0.00072099175,0.0017879554,0.0007269779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298346,0.05082405,0.012274232,0.0012101188,0.0032156475,0.002641458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289268,0.00025089143,0.00060591573,0.0029854663,0.0015136156,0.0073017483,0.000500071,0.0012248199,0.0064533832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05963495,0.00019235695,0.0002874147,0.0034466756,0.0052534984,0.005132414,0.0016703726,0.0016329918,0.00095669396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004252658,0.0006343801,0.54077786,0.00089709525,0.00044161142,0.00035253557,0.07488029,0.0011119021,0.0028388621,0.20929109,0.0056423876,0.16270666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008260525,0.0005412972,0.8287718,0.0006827788,0.00025562363,0.00030852773,0.046091862,0.0024085415,0.0013179042,0.07308896,0.0463502,0.0000998746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015061169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001605271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01289268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016657399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017320202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154288493","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03893.x","title":"Remaking the Presidency: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson, 1901‐1916 – By Peri E. Arnold","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Citation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049804686741709375,"score_gpt":0.31380576948116523,"score_spread":0.2640010827394559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154288493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021531845,0.23888826,0.0010621069,0.4768044,0.013895416,0.000046510846,0.0002775494,0.000047873345,0.247446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36327234,0.07753125,0.00085099676,0.049507298,0.007643987,0.00005861798,0.00014224982,0.00015658795,0.5008367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853504,0.00066814775,0.00005868572,0.00026141622,0.0002422002,0.00023444914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908984,0.0004142411,0.00016805869,0.000032881315,0.0001549721,0.00014000031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021735881,0.0005634476,0.00031840152,0.000819278,0.006315783,0.007093889,0.0008265911,0.0036257638,0.0065097534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061068516,0.0005561681,0.0001990265,0.001427296,0.004757125,0.0048625763,0.0015207763,0.008096001,0.0021475346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003289752,0.00003547381,0.00070024194,0.00008211272,0.000017284285,0.00019840896,0.015832825,0.00016867841,0.000077075776,0.25235868,0.68683374,0.043662686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067073056,0.000007208128,0.0011176099,0.0002420094,0.0000052976643,0.00008686693,0.0049143336,0.000051231167,0.00007615258,0.014659713,0.9788198,0.000013096722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07408892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2442327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07408892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00588929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005211318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14731538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2835894000","doi":"10.1111/psq.12464","title":"The Diversity of Unilateral Presidential Orders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03119393008496603,"score_gpt":0.3362892602455776,"score_spread":0.3050953301606116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2835894000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009887,0.0017349103,0.0055787326,0.005446197,0.00013687501,0.000037780526,0.0005914131,0.00007158928,0.18541385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982223,0.00013135167,0.00020279831,0.0001706852,0.0000660232,0.000011459377,0.00008510622,0.000009320078,0.0011009094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843679,0.005893274,0.00080269645,0.0014431764,0.005500328,0.0019926622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221535,0.056199383,0.005127214,0.006781749,0.0064419545,0.0032961862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010875437,0.00014632619,0.0008331025,0.0037954075,0.0041453107,0.009029512,0.00093648897,0.001405029,0.009866122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859526,0.0004050661,0.00033433468,0.0035184799,0.0046289554,0.0046505206,0.003414463,0.0018711977,0.0010084506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051414163,0.00014364449,0.1014457,0.00017853639,0.00020330797,0.00020951356,0.016636733,0.0011902921,0.0026881776,0.78475946,0.007213382,0.08481712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001280576,0.00014863329,0.32789004,0.0002444249,0.00023800871,0.00065349427,0.019344077,0.0035677075,0.0021064146,0.60609376,0.039483026,0.000102363345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016263888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044960445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010875437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020036784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016680039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057515502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339222831","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x","title":"“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Political science; Character (mathematics); Persona; Law; Linguistics; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08396634978852817,"score_gpt":0.26788132284603405,"score_spread":0.18391497305750587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339222831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90225863,0.00052593974,0.0017776844,0.0019458667,0.00009148584,0.000014020137,0.00003443483,0.000033452816,0.09331836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669975,0.00037377712,0.00033534414,0.00011739086,0.000050664414,0.000009239892,0.00002479477,0.0000151610475,0.0023739433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971961,0.0017371398,0.000050506904,0.00011748606,0.0006187194,0.0002800284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474406,0.0030326867,0.0009947751,0.00019565405,0.0006290798,0.00040373474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028135264,0.00038916102,0.00014794366,0.0018160078,0.0033667965,0.006557648,0.00027770855,0.0008833138,0.004203531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010985756,0.00027218653,0.00019807463,0.0011428687,0.0041963495,0.003765845,0.0033820085,0.0017111608,0.0007071229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018343251,0.00010282322,0.09628392,0.00019077145,0.000038159422,0.00049259554,0.75938606,0.0002462002,0.003770034,0.03203662,0.0051809084,0.10208852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009613858,0.00014055257,0.14414,0.00021700475,0.000048925187,0.00047196346,0.8184627,0.00051899,0.0019217867,0.003213834,0.030804088,0.00005051624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032584034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068314536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006557648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011792998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008301819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014879584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213240781","doi":"10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00229.x","title":"The Legacy of John Adams","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04227632875375947,"score_gpt":0.3253315176716337,"score_spread":0.28305518891787423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213240781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000692528,0.3390765,0.0006875664,0.4126847,0.07083687,0.000016121985,0.00021448289,0.0001257593,0.17566554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017555522,0.13916548,0.0010987767,0.09737705,0.025971161,0.000035883855,0.00017787317,0.0002326087,0.7183857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807006,0.00044809032,0.00007452896,0.00039013886,0.00078893045,0.00022826662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974712,0.0005220735,0.00021022666,0.00014647479,0.0009801536,0.00066986296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019092899,0.00071033824,0.00043843454,0.0013770374,0.0040463284,0.005814111,0.0007680488,0.0026901516,0.034147356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061745835,0.00049862784,0.00032148036,0.0015622489,0.0021562674,0.0051143165,0.0024540527,0.0064534815,0.019827668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011457246,0.000006817036,0.00008214925,0.0000492758,0.0000020606692,0.000017466617,0.00021970047,0.000010379088,0.000031688516,0.013223119,0.96159714,0.024748642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.688171e-7,0.0000021124072,0.0000840672,0.0000683165,7.363788e-7,0.000024876843,0.00010613993,0.000004867759,0.00001746443,0.0011856324,0.99850285,0.0000020472667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019796388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035770956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034147356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023520486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041819164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11423427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323925465","doi":"10.1111/psq.12823","title":"Managing our SOBs: Washington's response to friendly dictators in trouble","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Argument (complex analysis); White (mutation); Political science; Political economy; Foreign policy; Law and economics; Law; Development economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.031303022166940045,"score_gpt":0.3768631547745976,"score_spread":0.34556013260765756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323925465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468271,0.00042788193,0.00035357618,0.053957887,0.0006338858,0.000052618503,0.000058531805,0.000030155375,0.09765854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98346806,0.00017893541,0.00011263627,0.003962648,0.000063970205,0.000020530164,0.000020400026,0.000012167827,0.012160589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985018,0.00052036496,0.000048289166,0.00010115055,0.0001363559,0.00069201755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995083,0.0013315151,0.0007479545,0.00016829369,0.00056564785,0.0021037364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805718,0.00019279194,0.00016616168,0.000495544,0.012218694,0.005389399,0.0006629084,0.003169008,0.008305639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008411911,0.00020435077,0.00011657546,0.00050582574,0.0030907248,0.0023840885,0.003413642,0.005790323,0.0007791696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004793424,0.000542654,0.15625483,0.00023247625,0.00008313413,0.0140018435,0.38546804,0.0011606122,0.004100527,0.07697376,0.2667999,0.09390281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028381948,0.00016769153,0.050597213,0.00023135055,0.000018838347,0.00043378476,0.6772923,0.0005981807,0.0010021736,0.0055578197,0.2639902,0.0000821197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035064816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096097514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035064816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038715566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004086319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06972146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390946246","doi":"10.1111/psq.12867","title":"The president and the vice president: Different types of partnerships for a unique power couple","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Vice president; Typology; General partnership; Power (physics); Political science; Administration (probate law); Executive power; Principal (computer security); Inherent powers; Public relations; Public administration; Management; Sociology; Law; Politics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07834875492056055,"score_gpt":0.41579845292638734,"score_spread":0.3374496980058268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390946246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73838276,0.00080734905,0.015077295,0.0048467354,0.00010905128,0.00009790996,0.00004609413,0.000046541147,0.24058616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981427,0.00009443818,0.0004832994,0.00006487775,0.000009718859,0.000015688578,0.0000072234902,0.00000382902,0.0011782468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514425,0.002928553,0.0001341915,0.0003197656,0.0005967779,0.000876457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918773,0.0031847116,0.0014051505,0.00062700134,0.0007112649,0.0021945282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041893893,0.00021515651,0.00029025215,0.0016204085,0.0054599997,0.008654477,0.0007371827,0.0013122864,0.007151854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607061,0.00038079935,0.00029685177,0.0014880451,0.007018103,0.0077756047,0.0072520724,0.0011678982,0.00059876434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012176144,0.00014657457,0.054737844,0.00008628286,0.000029606377,0.0017936596,0.09603951,0.00049728225,0.00064201694,0.80531013,0.0030155582,0.037579827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088631496,0.00022548996,0.04968318,0.0004281268,0.00007207257,0.004018866,0.45036197,0.0065992284,0.0007952598,0.3967639,0.090865314,0.00009797336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015943303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024976768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008654477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018359614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019365187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023925304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}