{"meta":{"query_hash":"40683746c37d","filters":{"venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/40683746c37d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Problema+Anuario+de+Filosof%C3%ADa+y+Teor%C3%ADa+del+Derecho"},"results":[{"id":"W2115301571","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2009.3.8075","title":"A Living Tree Constitutionalist Replies","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Tree (set theory); Political science; Mathematics; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.01136539754906831,"score_gpt":0.2204982895737308,"score_spread":0.20913289202466248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115301571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39210907,0.009938478,0.013151922,0.021225173,0.00091219257,0.0026072923,0.00039322337,0.0008737985,0.55878884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97214663,0.0010078624,0.010565237,0.004842939,0.00025359704,0.000059244103,0.000042791296,0.000051654923,0.011030036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958185,0.00024874354,0.00075309945,0.0012004111,0.0008873504,0.0010919038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980198,0.0002272457,0.00043931295,0.0007445141,0.000021444466,0.0005476586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057409314,0.0006984684,0.0006025919,0.0001515277,0.00086949544,0.00012584432,0.0007614296,0.00037647263,0.0030832666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001075341,0.00067924423,0.00036865537,0.00042257327,0.0046423576,0.00055495894,0.00034011248,0.00069933844,0.0026129365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005794189,0.0070271413,0.40942246,0.00050706347,0.00054294034,0.0010135085,0.008655959,0.008480122,0.0742346,0.1064598,0.17477567,0.20830134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010566035,0.001244243,0.675773,0.0010724274,0.00032948528,0.00096357695,0.0007318318,0.0020591225,0.0009818809,0.027904568,0.28538716,0.002496072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009823629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007306164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5800376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018209753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021186343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262421116","doi":"","title":"Desacuerdos y descriptivismo en la filosofía del derecho","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Politics; Legal positivism; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Law; Comparative law; Theology","score_opus":0.06088599584842349,"score_gpt":0.2744722126942788,"score_spread":0.2135862168458553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262421116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1309541,0.015619983,0.013451908,0.0467044,0.004197412,0.0053139045,0.0024326288,0.0027782638,0.7785474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766517,0.0009843699,0.005361093,0.0052116956,0.0029372503,0.00046748697,0.00025592465,0.00049985875,0.007630581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886897,0.0026177482,0.0021294286,0.002082843,0.0017972866,0.002682969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914046,0.0023376911,0.00090378977,0.0018395756,0.0014927796,0.002021594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596338,0.0019673635,0.0019192615,0.0008473673,0.0014478188,0.0035427085,0.0021914407,0.002189052,0.0015571191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023145159,0.0018901184,0.0009559515,0.00045353032,0.0019680355,0.0014918505,0.0010606516,0.0045577353,0.0024240552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058416417,0.0014601888,0.0018344398,0.00087940635,0.00078352337,0.00045002476,0.016642671,0.0001763666,0.00043174616,0.95566046,0.013406999,0.0076900213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00257549,0.0007930031,0.0002731198,0.0010413944,0.000556973,0.00024889965,0.0008110208,0.002541428,0.0004908295,0.72766054,0.26105163,0.001955671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026089349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041693295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84569764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010713278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263527188","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2010.4.8090","title":"The Americans with Disabilities Act and Health Care Allocation","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Humanities; Philosophy; Health care; Political science; Welfare economics; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.040597380963353254,"score_gpt":0.29072718794002095,"score_spread":0.2501298069766677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263527188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47274947,0.020461619,0.008337444,0.45093554,0.0014594446,0.0058366414,0.0010646442,0.00039876762,0.03875641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843021,0.0046173898,0.0056409747,0.0033513505,0.00027480852,0.00035140585,0.000056570694,0.00007625495,0.0013291358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969312,0.000110486464,0.00095909904,0.00081078627,0.00012213695,0.0010663079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759644,0.00032244032,0.0006560001,0.00088876305,0.00012602261,0.00041035196],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399855,0.00043237564,0.00062288705,0.00019845372,0.0010824841,0.00064904185,0.0004630945,0.00023615318,0.000058114965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026141893,0.00037357982,0.00010982242,0.0003674502,0.0005308944,0.00030574942,0.00016628228,0.0008760477,0.00010390533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007133175,0.00014317117,0.27555847,0.0014940164,0.00018023397,0.0000024776741,0.010639905,0.000038240378,0.000006091102,0.6255645,0.002886485,0.083415076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176795,0.0012855314,0.19130565,0.00023562125,0.00005031622,0.00004080123,0.004289551,0.0016998686,0.0000530711,0.052135933,0.74663395,0.0010929098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030082561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017866556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7437475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004522312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005376468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263663485","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2011.5.8100","title":"50th Anniversary of Hart's The Concept of Law. Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029059746663384737,"score_gpt":0.26374822076189436,"score_spread":0.23468847409850963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263663485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2738909,0.012700882,0.0014884189,0.04333382,0.004002963,0.0051758657,0.0008003824,0.00053498504,0.65807176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99005276,0.0013231444,0.003574054,0.0005814171,0.000905351,0.000034530225,0.00002701174,0.00003530581,0.003466454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679637,0.00063926115,0.00072009914,0.00052580517,0.00068206503,0.0006364083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976825,0.00017139845,0.00076078717,0.000622551,0.0005957583,0.0001669902],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012945365,0.0003482386,0.0005583879,0.000024845263,0.00072290876,0.00007918743,0.0009717678,0.00061692874,0.0011531711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017364777,0.00026729683,0.00043736683,0.0006246675,0.0026816241,0.00058248726,0.00017584898,0.0006597555,0.000049124585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014811826,0.0006258724,0.0032890514,0.00027607815,0.00037379086,0.0000052496816,0.16392706,0.000033511973,0.002484989,0.7848509,0.04112987,0.0028555335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025517738,0.001428516,0.006951449,0.00070859183,0.0013026512,0.000040314004,0.042525224,0.00016594164,0.105052285,0.336131,0.5016331,0.0015091572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006773399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003406196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7161618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015618154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003836588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475800475","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2015.9.8183","title":"Charter Interpretation, Judicial Review and a Community's Constitutional Morality: Responding to Natalie Stoljar on Wil Waluchow","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"review","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Morality; Worry; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08516005879393775,"score_gpt":0.3752467636066387,"score_spread":0.290086704812701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475800475","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033333333,0.8794864,0.00077425316,0.02771719,0.0010896603,0.005987148,0.0015791295,0.0002978883,0.082735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032787066,0.95013607,0.00096781796,0.012350918,0.0009345428,0.0012111173,0.00046736802,0.000074055046,0.0010710702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900301,0.0042029642,0.0017505962,0.0011642356,0.0016228986,0.0012292113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481326,0.0013767175,0.00090906903,0.0007424995,0.0012491565,0.00090927765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074455366,0.0011941622,0.0030269998,0.0009187266,0.0038651854,0.0005122585,0.0012528343,0.00075024355,0.00022862587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039664702,0.0011006327,0.0005540103,0.0023822212,0.0033791403,0.00057560916,0.00077691895,0.0025934463,0.0009045401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003123654,0.0007889047,0.00042170088,0.013261353,0.0012074575,0.00008004654,0.0069064107,0.000011387673,0.0000042323513,0.7303544,0.047680885,0.19897084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005306708,0.00053427776,0.00009475621,0.04368092,0.0018321853,0.0000963797,0.00046989953,0.000010734922,0.000001257133,0.049549762,0.9019632,0.0012359921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045825364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010470218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85428226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016578091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003657835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231994154","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2017.11.11088","title":"Margaret Martin","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Photographic and Visual Arts","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.04310777747510024,"score_gpt":0.290333654068792,"score_spread":0.24722587659369177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231994154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49760735,0.0022183666,0.00033219354,0.01647836,0.0023393454,0.00221127,0.00090533745,0.0007334054,0.47717437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664879,0.0005904887,0.00057825685,0.0015013962,0.0015887441,0.00020470984,0.0000909383,0.00016481464,0.028792795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531233,0.00025192372,0.0010116968,0.001113663,0.00065273885,0.0016576386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995851,0.00015277887,0.0009783626,0.0020164675,0.00039245567,0.0006089531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010291636,0.0009224717,0.0009260495,0.00034675165,0.0046847537,0.006372443,0.0017994541,0.0005285426,0.005211087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032517425,0.0008770337,0.0006065207,0.00006508813,0.0013271351,0.0011572283,0.00071890955,0.0010857757,0.0017275923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035907212,0.0011693202,0.13059996,0.001137239,0.0006717925,0.00030130596,0.010180818,0.000004038862,0.00079501746,0.7057141,0.13615789,0.012909423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017446948,0.00057506753,0.026828386,0.001042005,0.00040128423,0.00007059854,0.00042573357,0.0014336959,0.0009284813,0.11085466,0.8539938,0.0017016114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042836526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018569571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7178359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015728382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032276456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405224118","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2025.19.18773","title":"Waluchow’s constitutional morality and the artificial reason of the Common Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Rationality; Law; Philosophy of law; Scope (computer science); Constitutional law; Philosophy; Rule of law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.033711042017283824,"score_gpt":0.296853218188618,"score_spread":0.2631421761713342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405224118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1840689,0.016849693,0.0022506074,0.1982333,0.002284839,0.0027615572,0.0003561651,0.00044979254,0.5927451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818784,0.00023683187,0.00020928113,0.00075562927,0.0002715606,0.00007047626,0.000004474538,0.000005649672,0.0002582847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810684,0.0004341544,0.00035208138,0.00026755343,0.0005152358,0.00032412255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989177,0.0005813381,0.00009340085,0.00018373302,0.00014533219,0.00007847628],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001615468,0.00015388666,0.00025793412,0.000034003962,0.0016259195,0.00018753088,0.00032953304,0.00013150068,0.00006511305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000293129,0.00009119531,0.00016327041,0.00039374776,0.008573042,0.00018416623,0.00016399019,0.00034376493,0.000021536442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051909326,0.000038397797,0.0045980206,0.000028144235,0.00006866833,0.0000036892395,0.0017804283,0.000017803388,0.000060573828,0.98945695,0.0013926645,0.002502729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022861059,0.000015290567,0.002989855,0.00015539106,0.00009753127,0.000013438095,0.00038672786,0.00023136978,0.00021571503,0.94116193,0.054362394,0.00014177391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030104818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012066277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013638772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062994537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}