{"meta":{"query_hash":"ffd120003891","filters":{"venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ffd120003891","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Proceedings+of+the+Annual+Meeting+of+the+Cognitive+Science+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W21952862","doi":"10.1590/s0102-311x2011001500011","title":"Acquisition of concepts with characteristic and defining features","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognitive science; Probabilistic logic; Artificial intelligence; Confusion; Dual (grammatical number); Verb; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011177373506265376,"score_gpt":0.27198150877666993,"score_spread":0.2608041352704046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21952862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707139,0.00046100965,0.008833768,0.00047138394,0.000038068112,0.00007017032,0.00025811695,0.000057127498,0.019096354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008394,0.00041332422,0.015279805,0.00018535295,0.00003090112,0.0000791107,0.00057912443,0.000021716161,0.0033267818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00018843428,0.00005733104,0.00019806644,0.00028769096,0.000097907316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930137,0.0026190055,0.0018902717,0.0009890954,0.0010074851,0.00048053398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017514796,0.0002280044,0.000268954,0.00091446383,0.00044703708,0.0014390305,0.0005942941,0.0005357685,0.005219779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129958065,0.000199326,0.0004453791,0.00069899566,0.0008703986,0.0030252305,0.0012864892,0.0010906751,0.0006071343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041982887,0.0007165752,0.56123495,0.00071184785,0.00015571149,0.0020597745,0.022218194,0.00056517136,0.018752337,0.06929751,0.003625625,0.32024246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010145366,0.0015201202,0.7873382,0.00038852048,0.00022371643,0.011717478,0.0141255595,0.0027875,0.0068335347,0.12170395,0.053148273,0.00011170945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011271181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094283465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005219779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046462278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093400147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017461956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587594965","doi":"","title":"The Influence of Outcome Severity on Ascriptions of Intention & Punishment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.019572420323485842,"score_gpt":0.31307874904393873,"score_spread":0.2935063287204529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587594965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994697,0.000034896035,0.0002740875,0.000060933464,0.0000064189594,0.000016956052,0.00003968852,0.0000088997485,0.0048611676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989975,0.000028891247,0.00033141914,0.000023302808,0.0000038413586,0.000019391913,0.000057681107,0.000010746041,0.00052731414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772805,0.0010362066,0.00013174192,0.00023216613,0.0007436752,0.00012808686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694458,0.016609915,0.008632713,0.0017550936,0.002046749,0.0015095781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026705957,0.00026417992,0.00018138869,0.00042741853,0.00032733736,0.0015658322,0.00025988347,0.00034487882,0.003071796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033340264,0.0001993929,0.00020682694,0.00022655421,0.0007918412,0.0006813341,0.0010028692,0.0012634456,0.0002902967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025207242,0.0011911476,0.87820977,0.00019163614,0.00025906618,0.0004155458,0.019874826,0.0013812112,0.048790786,0.0031283873,0.0012874765,0.04274944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023655202,0.00038487816,0.9919876,0.000034143628,0.00003585976,0.00014650602,0.00200797,0.00103291,0.0027965552,0.00094771537,0.0005748305,0.000027451533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002290697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034525078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003071796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031756572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014123678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613342285","doi":"","title":"Evaluating Information Design for Notification Systems - eScholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Wearable computer; Variety (cybernetics); Information system; Mobile device; Human–computer interaction; Ubiquitous computing; Perception; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.3747123922527643,"score_gpt":0.4372657955688803,"score_spread":0.06255340331611597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613342285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74630255,0.009525711,0.17437252,0.003292563,0.00081676303,0.008865295,0.0019171403,0.005923748,0.048983727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83568704,0.0013778798,0.15366039,0.0003087243,0.00014092503,0.0015897444,0.0018985078,0.0004166598,0.0049200924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525182,0.030917805,0.0038509383,0.0018025797,0.010224419,0.0006860746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.756752,0.17607509,0.017419335,0.0128828725,0.032736976,0.0041337134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03476248,0.0011510256,0.0009931513,0.0038510822,0.0009971424,0.0065078693,0.0011383725,0.0015378945,0.008443167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2172256,0.00046151082,0.0013451165,0.0018868868,0.00059604045,0.005072458,0.001993256,0.0011420882,0.0017727587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005836727,0.002147095,0.027661366,0.0033358012,0.0005387187,0.00017229958,0.0025341704,0.030953728,0.006643191,0.0070271823,0.014477622,0.8986721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006401924,0.043377023,0.11802486,0.006362975,0.004662459,0.00072500395,0.010733785,0.54698706,0.063094765,0.036425058,0.16242053,0.00078456535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020861896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021381176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03476248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037550018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026062266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18384379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617640433","doi":"","title":"Atomistic and Systems Approaches to Consciousness - eScholarship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive Science and Education Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Focus (optics); Feeling; Perception; Cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1608721835608191,"score_gpt":0.3094553008795341,"score_spread":0.148583117318715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617640433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028927626,0.04585255,0.39369658,0.07984942,0.0013278038,0.00009318642,0.00016243872,0.00024946837,0.44984084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90717995,0.011953408,0.04619677,0.002768809,0.0010853958,0.00014776355,0.00007420663,0.000082930215,0.030510738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855334,0.00069866684,0.000051203257,0.0001964164,0.00035647812,0.00014381646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980294,0.0010818467,0.00013229634,0.0002906868,0.00030457816,0.00016114727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024249062,0.00051316153,0.0005607629,0.0018357176,0.001612278,0.0049079414,0.0012548622,0.0021005333,0.0049308557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027768156,0.00030471786,0.0007929346,0.001260263,0.015833141,0.0075355456,0.0035725185,0.004185991,0.00059324206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017130517,0.0000025343447,0.00002542822,0.000011339378,0.0000015865364,0.000010615486,0.00022053887,0.00031448854,0.000027843667,0.9973285,0.00044793467,0.0016075452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014127801,0.0000016603904,0.00003225731,0.000008193423,9.688972e-7,0.000009991524,0.00006758228,0.00059749035,0.000021454543,0.9959215,0.0033354764,0.0000020556827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027100323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019846011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049308557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016339646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03294164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623551224","doi":"","title":"Dysexecutive syndrome model using ACT-R - eScholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dysexecutive syndrome; Psychology; Perseveration; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Neuropsychology; Cognitive psychology; Action (physics); Robustness (evolution); Cognition; Executive functions; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03523835386485275,"score_gpt":0.3181574788242049,"score_spread":0.2829191249593522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623551224","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22858584,0.00090233365,0.7015936,0.0019056224,0.0001830552,0.00023486781,0.0017491095,0.0015783152,0.06326725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92081356,0.00043508364,0.06096743,0.00009064415,0.000051205938,0.0004325566,0.000878878,0.00010088977,0.016229756],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974865,0.00009758928,0.000014405916,0.000047316287,0.000051167055,0.0000409258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994574,0.000246246,0.0000758506,0.00004320064,0.0001294913,0.000047676593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005499413,0.0006144342,0.0005076985,0.0006061826,0.0003946196,0.00094991195,0.0011223048,0.00068950147,0.006694782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012982287,0.0002735701,0.0010615876,0.00036343274,0.00053301844,0.00056038296,0.0006324445,0.0008138263,0.0011708038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009263935,0.00009121085,0.004894783,0.000043953754,0.00007384268,0.00051715755,0.000147964,0.9265394,0.00049491186,0.05593456,0.0016589485,0.009510546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138354035,0.000029801937,0.00044905057,0.0000072309463,0.000016003285,0.00005194735,0.000016312883,0.9888102,0.00008025149,0.009365432,0.0011534421,0.0000064916885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017870076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0117318835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017870076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008093343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012744301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035532117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626011063","doi":"","title":"Metarepresentation in Philososphy and Psychology - eScholarship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Mental representation; Frith; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Confusion; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03346464949165234,"score_gpt":0.34563887171737506,"score_spread":0.3121742222257227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626011063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11982495,0.03983261,0.14469557,0.07119778,0.0012747257,0.00004675042,0.00013953957,0.00034555912,0.62264246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779107,0.0031230452,0.00820193,0.0013345798,0.00031161832,0.000026409061,0.00004279547,0.00006701291,0.008981997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766785,0.0014744186,0.000096615775,0.00026124174,0.00036338865,0.00013657675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977673,0.001124688,0.0001631208,0.0005247416,0.00027124814,0.00014895297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037921255,0.00027935073,0.00040650298,0.002121322,0.0019969437,0.0060228705,0.00066745793,0.0016078791,0.003391617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038368895,0.00024425052,0.00039439194,0.0015124205,0.023316957,0.010578311,0.0032589813,0.002383669,0.00035142037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071034674,0.000004748357,0.00014766409,0.000014969373,0.0000036350018,0.000021961478,0.0026107547,0.00010331547,0.00007340263,0.9912698,0.00082045037,0.0049221436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045948605,0.0000054271477,0.00029727147,0.000035325415,0.0000032917221,0.00006488415,0.0010168744,0.00029618142,0.000092612325,0.9808482,0.017329084,0.00000624587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023111317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020218021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060228705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038151247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012028664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027680814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626176996","doi":"","title":"Emotionality impairs memory for associations - eScholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amygdala; Psychology; Association (psychology); Emotionality; Hippocampal formation; Episodic memory; Emotional memory; Cognitive psychology; Hippocampus; Recall; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.06834207746337131,"score_gpt":0.33083122572866513,"score_spread":0.2624891482652938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626176996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976223,0.00034713603,0.00011403909,0.00013579296,0.00002510854,0.000006149235,0.00005779578,0.000023791656,0.001667849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919349,0.0006136906,0.00026226602,0.00014206937,0.0000092577375,0.000011435617,0.000101113816,0.000011553414,0.0069137146],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984956,0.000014381356,0.000007641618,0.000019929323,0.0000647864,0.000043666565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979585,0.000020345426,0.000045865134,0.000025015446,0.00002715352,0.00008577598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015013831,0.0004718085,0.00023435312,0.00027272658,0.00019748871,0.0003976782,0.00029784825,0.00031636964,0.0047177626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026747593,0.00019668067,0.00011659314,0.0001199801,0.00046792423,0.00018912158,0.00038892697,0.00075459044,0.0006442708],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00462853,0.0011553797,0.008840906,0.00009202644,0.00007622191,0.00047544204,0.00021806716,0.00012807567,0.9648448,0.00033243408,0.0016285746,0.017579416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004203361,0.0062496755,0.6110623,0.00009155178,0.00023992526,0.002118343,0.0008360969,0.0013117733,0.36855307,0.0015713391,0.0074771186,0.000068529174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067740455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012048192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067740455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005276476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003354894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015782475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626578885","doi":"","title":"Linguistic Resources and \"Ontologies\" across Sense Modalities A Comparison between Color, Odor, and Noise and Sound - eScholarship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Sound symbolism; Linguistics; Personal pronoun; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03517028294918421,"score_gpt":0.3423512240066362,"score_spread":0.307180941057452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626578885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8487148,0.004718318,0.046077024,0.0032545622,0.00011033344,0.0001128032,0.0018785481,0.00024474834,0.09488881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890732,0.0006136116,0.00789111,0.000098884666,0.000025767062,0.000055215827,0.0007343521,0.00007378723,0.0014339971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961408,0.001718037,0.0004982152,0.00066181674,0.0008142674,0.00016683314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988414,0.0062896856,0.0011656767,0.00089820666,0.0014590141,0.00030334532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029933352,0.00028449815,0.00032333843,0.005915579,0.0017583418,0.0045162085,0.00042492818,0.0005457048,0.0048733773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009838241,0.00028212686,0.0004400784,0.004561868,0.003953531,0.007807033,0.002716658,0.0008023882,0.00032483728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086504105,0.00012706818,0.07486431,0.0011394116,0.00025899004,0.0011120702,0.15754727,0.001201139,0.035743613,0.43140814,0.0070202136,0.28871274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013190304,0.00025739352,0.42473,0.0012731598,0.00051622675,0.0030575553,0.19077563,0.009570287,0.009913062,0.1825948,0.17689708,0.0002829232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053791795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00410982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005915579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018664579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010911411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016303003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765156980","doi":"","title":"Children's Causal Learning from Fiction: Assessing the Proximity Between Real and Fictional Worlds - eScholarship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Fantasy; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Fictional universe; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Art; Philosophy; Literature; History; Narrative","score_opus":0.04023383770208678,"score_gpt":0.3362064577098601,"score_spread":0.2959726200077733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765156980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99391466,0.00028785632,0.0007254259,0.000089134366,0.000013753671,0.00012002693,0.00015478459,0.000040002626,0.0046543893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914125,0.00085826794,0.004310602,0.00007036525,0.000012447631,0.0002776293,0.0004442045,0.000025987738,0.0025880784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990952,0.00011572608,0.00011626514,0.0002034231,0.0003609048,0.00010860308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452955,0.0015971077,0.0022499235,0.00035931825,0.0005598233,0.0007042386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012730932,0.000653986,0.00050461,0.0020977256,0.0005317238,0.0022533326,0.0006783669,0.0014430536,0.004706241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117728105,0.0005373555,0.00084701757,0.00062783813,0.0009787476,0.0018460302,0.0025399148,0.0012917805,0.00065588136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007326265,0.0014753134,0.75707376,0.0015151858,0.00022274199,0.0041212537,0.057506952,0.0013583632,0.030995844,0.0020471509,0.003425821,0.13952498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002878771,0.0007874995,0.968709,0.00020485086,0.00012392006,0.004642675,0.010246872,0.0008917268,0.006942167,0.0012833918,0.0060444954,0.00009450259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024551046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043116123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004706241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065911096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015743911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765242991","doi":"","title":"Theoretical Assessment of the SOILIE Model of the Human Imagination - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental image; Creativity; Cognition; Psychology; Rendering (computer graphics); Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026959052988020087,"score_gpt":0.3653694507610916,"score_spread":0.3384103977730715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765242991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16557646,0.0048498614,0.34673655,0.020080725,0.00022018612,0.00014274416,0.00020589924,0.00018034677,0.46200734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720454,0.00066528097,0.022393204,0.00022572532,0.00006741417,0.0001147943,0.00005955552,0.000011724605,0.00441682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987275,0.00064198615,0.00005121619,0.00015340034,0.00031535677,0.00011049823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686,0.0018650374,0.00022959666,0.0003767851,0.00045466234,0.00021393846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001998266,0.0005369403,0.0003411942,0.00209977,0.0010350266,0.0035816317,0.0013049539,0.0012808845,0.0042161085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028324,0.00024914937,0.000813736,0.0009612422,0.011951713,0.0049819625,0.0021545354,0.0014848468,0.00056947727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008068307,0.000010902456,0.00029298515,0.000019296878,0.000004080654,0.000047079997,0.0011586252,0.0015792806,0.0000645777,0.9936278,0.0003984858,0.002788951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001387828,0.000026653908,0.00047156686,0.000039936505,0.0000052929,0.00015312499,0.00127249,0.015402411,0.0001238178,0.9752331,0.0072457227,0.0000120556815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002194426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014253808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042161085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026552912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012399801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019265652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765305673","doi":"","title":"The Geometrician: a Computer Prototype of Problem Solving in Geometry Construction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Computer science; Reflection (computer programming); Set (abstract data type); Compass; Computer graphics (images); Artificial intelligence; Geometry; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Programming language; Psychology","score_opus":0.013478914455747174,"score_gpt":0.2938829918575559,"score_spread":0.2804040774018087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765305673","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02703959,0.0014197475,0.8429446,0.0041663107,0.00039180598,0.0008606073,0.00038224214,0.0092906505,0.11350438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10573723,0.0013920498,0.85707635,0.0006723702,0.00008573958,0.0014060647,0.00071337924,0.0012011451,0.031715754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989335,0.00056184136,0.00005456394,0.0001865931,0.00019795618,0.00006558353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974694,0.0016578359,0.000048817183,0.00043009073,0.00019490204,0.00019893498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017165755,0.0010684762,0.0005648607,0.0008084849,0.00092339655,0.0037989123,0.004037554,0.0026213226,0.024873063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050173635,0.00046197211,0.0008712399,0.00057722954,0.0037285662,0.0063457913,0.0029876458,0.0022786483,0.00397404],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006182792,0.0009556308,0.0016803431,0.0009890934,0.00005083113,0.0012577642,0.014631739,0.017616149,0.022380518,0.47878024,0.0698511,0.3911884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043475832,0.00083092233,0.0014108656,0.00055788097,0.00006278729,0.0020706453,0.0025673343,0.07384665,0.010789786,0.19539337,0.7118813,0.00015374858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018834217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024538098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024873063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010440636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013685869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08320862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765465403","doi":"","title":"Motivation-biased design - eScholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.057588156511351345,"score_gpt":0.2597093767483225,"score_spread":0.20212122023697116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765465403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079802446,0.00089207076,0.7950017,0.012151831,0.00046291456,0.0012046569,0.000087947126,0.0012969865,0.1090995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70975214,0.0004855655,0.26577702,0.002548776,0.00009195294,0.0015728069,0.00014037953,0.0005864446,0.01904503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94113994,0.045637254,0.001797319,0.002879178,0.00749288,0.0010534673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8983675,0.05515983,0.0055472367,0.027871413,0.011144828,0.0019092563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04121118,0.0009056174,0.00045248773,0.0012698675,0.0021335343,0.00538561,0.0020283908,0.001966271,0.0090885535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09974075,0.00070652546,0.00089483726,0.0007870664,0.0071950722,0.006220626,0.005594271,0.0024442817,0.0018897023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029066068,0.0004838599,0.01592252,0.0011055929,0.00012520359,0.00038368732,0.04063348,0.0056051034,0.005051836,0.5851516,0.015346998,0.32989946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029103967,0.00072640914,0.005670798,0.0015218813,0.00015802198,0.00094814727,0.009673371,0.02593029,0.011151915,0.63489765,0.30889022,0.00014033899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008587517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012924826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04121118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028410424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042131627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21794814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765630183","doi":"","title":"Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Aesthetic Judgement - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transcranial direct-current stimulation; Prefrontal cortex; Stimulation; Psychology; Neuroscience; Judgement; Self-reference effect; Audiology; Affect (linguistics); Cognition; Consumer neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.01883246883402719,"score_gpt":0.2854809922559441,"score_spread":0.2666485234219169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765630183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963921,0.0007964581,0.0011912456,0.00006714213,0.000023427741,0.000029929693,0.00002338477,0.00001550854,0.001460908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.00026384764,0.0006333771,0.000027030674,0.000009539552,0.000015433976,0.000013454284,0.000002651302,0.00047713026],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999331,0.000019978032,0.000004479307,0.000012026982,0.000018083398,0.000012235047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997812,0.000115042596,0.000034729073,0.000017550341,0.000020087822,0.000031431075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001851297,0.000154876,0.00010606222,0.00009947263,0.000050790346,0.000119877965,0.0000932404,0.00015295812,0.0023367684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084623223,0.00006564399,0.00011338294,0.000042963133,0.0001648531,0.00012331588,0.00012025683,0.00018621635,0.00012864302],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005439124,0.000697687,0.0033946272,0.00029235214,0.00007612895,0.00021519889,0.00016906609,0.00036237112,0.89781606,0.00012997903,0.00021389939,0.091193564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019684236,0.024353353,0.5644571,0.00013236416,0.0003974939,0.0024204059,0.0004956683,0.0070876423,0.39390716,0.0015501798,0.0031885481,0.000041739095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033911792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046933407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023367684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007364118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012983174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007817268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765828543","doi":"","title":"Plan and Situated Action Relationship as a Function of Activity Category: An Experimental Approach - eScholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Categorization; Action (physics); Ambiguity; Plan (archaeology); Function (biology); Categorical variable; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23832596724903862,"score_gpt":0.3797105877573849,"score_spread":0.1413846205083463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765828543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99364233,0.00003139326,0.0010795551,0.000103096245,0.000044929933,0.00054601196,0.00011691296,0.000024635094,0.0044111614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97919333,0.00009611536,0.0063603967,0.00018116129,0.000067058514,0.0069135544,0.00035744577,0.00004998368,0.0067810174],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533373,0.0020242787,0.00046583722,0.00093816896,0.00084311696,0.00039484754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971401,0.016842024,0.0030436458,0.006524638,0.0009854597,0.00120324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048420746,0.0007556493,0.0010839646,0.0009432084,0.0014415344,0.0028370032,0.002256958,0.0016674442,0.014662594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021613698,0.0008671634,0.00078958,0.00093925133,0.0034925882,0.0028755357,0.0035432798,0.00311869,0.0014831009],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.067669325,0.44784212,0.07306663,0.0015730438,0.0005672884,0.0013571611,0.07278031,0.0054415353,0.13192831,0.0498459,0.0059323916,0.14199594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027674194,0.28916562,0.40476793,0.00052868313,0.0013098087,0.0010387608,0.042985827,0.038437437,0.052257925,0.106176265,0.03465065,0.0010070128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012008293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010879806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014662594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010879599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007551847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049051285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765850199","doi":"","title":"Methods for Classifying Errors on the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test - eScholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Raven's Progressive Matrices; Standard error; Test (biology); Analogy; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.048656501315889666,"score_gpt":0.3758090381484613,"score_spread":0.3271525368325716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765850199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10639501,0.001802326,0.84790325,0.0008142001,0.0006181886,0.009946221,0.0088825,0.0052678916,0.018370299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16243328,0.0009714643,0.7941148,0.000347875,0.00020737709,0.01883375,0.006556913,0.0015217868,0.015012706],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496,0.0059241243,0.0056186053,0.0029579324,0.009920213,0.0006190597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93970096,0.018829105,0.012678299,0.0074348147,0.020476563,0.0008801953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021934204,0.0026100609,0.0014400368,0.01047858,0.0010477973,0.0028787504,0.0034159366,0.0017622781,0.010633196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10109092,0.0008121754,0.0020069736,0.004174076,0.0011059974,0.0029677039,0.0025707567,0.0021324535,0.004606965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015394724,0.0006823137,0.20099603,0.0011323084,0.0007451618,0.00034246597,0.0025547033,0.0033448588,0.007887358,0.010949737,0.027360318,0.7424653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002961,0.0029902076,0.69925785,0.0020271966,0.00089408155,0.004908022,0.003359119,0.06490312,0.04841835,0.05879173,0.11227759,0.0011697221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003406879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005703519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021934204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071694056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018446792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11600053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765905686","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Category Type and Working Memory Span on Attentional Learning in Categorization - eScholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Categorization; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Memory span; Cognition; Task (project management); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.019593329520154284,"score_gpt":0.3036488199823479,"score_spread":0.2840554904621936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765905686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00004882525,0.0003202666,0.000011702013,0.0000026710525,0.000005805343,0.00001455996,0.000008110046,0.0005018513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.000027834998,0.0005288805,0.000012972974,0.0000032971302,0.00001127776,0.000044223034,0.000010830285,0.000411519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994254,0.0001118266,0.000057653175,0.00013237531,0.00020706952,0.00006572122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120075,0.004209161,0.0020690719,0.0008918789,0.00073494704,0.0008941477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012190365,0.0002504653,0.00028795013,0.00037632906,0.00018222147,0.0011143608,0.00033342242,0.0002948635,0.0019984029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011985065,0.00020711584,0.00024310278,0.00017086773,0.0003050952,0.00073418836,0.0007690837,0.000463983,0.00028162135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051236576,0.0017565513,0.5990766,0.00013831085,0.0003735403,0.0002111337,0.0026064883,0.0021920507,0.23252147,0.0004174259,0.000582965,0.15499969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005618838,0.0014110495,0.9790508,0.00001904687,0.00006828796,0.00017659116,0.0004557146,0.003656197,0.013725864,0.00094064005,0.00040569223,0.000033892535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010995012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015112564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019984029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021919467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0066853166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766183613","doi":"","title":"Semantic Networks and Order Recall in Verbal Short-Term Memory - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Order (exchange); Psychology; Semantic memory; SAINT; History; Cognitive psychology; Art history; Cognition","score_opus":0.022882316590529767,"score_gpt":0.27350358439608585,"score_spread":0.2506212678055561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766183613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98953605,0.000843916,0.0021910465,0.00015897898,0.000019102408,0.000041531355,0.00015547524,0.00002516303,0.0070288116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995959,0.00034657313,0.0012237208,0.000053190084,0.000030228426,0.00004263896,0.00044463662,0.000024277668,0.0018756123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911517,0.00022515834,0.0000980785,0.00021767968,0.0002823725,0.00006158198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982357,0.008228575,0.005738546,0.0018709778,0.0010959635,0.00070882606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025603715,0.0003084398,0.0003568286,0.0011448145,0.00044350777,0.0031612134,0.00061130186,0.00071933004,0.0041865753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026558632,0.00033508905,0.0003573791,0.0009893517,0.0009937524,0.0064791897,0.0015999852,0.0009921961,0.0007280369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035836902,0.0015087518,0.7411282,0.00041291944,0.0006052648,0.00074109586,0.014619476,0.0042513483,0.015328405,0.01551997,0.0022339625,0.20006688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013765809,0.0011124788,0.9182636,0.00020097941,0.00023990282,0.0012327012,0.0043324763,0.007261063,0.004505623,0.059123747,0.003458159,0.00013174783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022667365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025579275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041865753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083519967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003679554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014005482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766301169","doi":"","title":"An Embodied Cognition Approach to Distinguishing Pictorial versus Symbolic Properties of Graphics for Design - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Graphics; Perception; Computer science; Cognition; Pickup; Human–computer interaction; Computer graphics; The Symbolic; Cognitive science; Computer graphics (images); Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.05253755900584987,"score_gpt":0.28275953704184253,"score_spread":0.23022197803599267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766301169","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08324397,0.0013703495,0.7369426,0.00625135,0.00011046254,0.000092084876,0.000060047132,0.0002059746,0.17172307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90393937,0.00040795037,0.090336226,0.0001747147,0.00002284174,0.000073000076,0.000028734949,0.000045658497,0.0049714977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991234,0.00042978863,0.000040405044,0.0001316548,0.0002012192,0.00007364684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845135,0.0009857132,0.00013438576,0.00018517929,0.00014931914,0.00009401485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010500342,0.00051966804,0.0002253379,0.0012688919,0.0008677458,0.004905622,0.0010887007,0.0012019932,0.0042219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035297358,0.00040209273,0.00077210326,0.0004762634,0.009529752,0.0061571104,0.002076628,0.0016097671,0.00029248808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035205565,0.000024794692,0.00041649517,0.000119257435,0.000012775977,0.000087982895,0.007359043,0.0037037611,0.0033380042,0.96736276,0.0003430846,0.017196754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004853155,0.00007721284,0.0019313724,0.00013713054,0.00004053401,0.00030275463,0.0040312824,0.030408803,0.004800399,0.93305224,0.025118561,0.000051286086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028563656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031358583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004905622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00250736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011514077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018192232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766399154","doi":"","title":"Intuition versus Reason: Strategies that People Use to Think about Moral Problems - eScholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Salient; Moral reasoning; Cognition; Social psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.10037572069111646,"score_gpt":0.29147101640658596,"score_spread":0.19109529571546952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766399154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588747,0.0009838511,0.018200789,0.0018988143,0.00004316149,0.000066808025,0.000032957854,0.00012962503,0.01976926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993541,0.000254601,0.005049239,0.00031662892,0.000013041496,0.000031158674,0.000032317654,0.000021160806,0.0007408672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359244,0.004146992,0.00033252698,0.0004927547,0.001056574,0.0003788077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98051906,0.0116331065,0.0038365352,0.0013669232,0.0016533354,0.0009910202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006156498,0.00078705145,0.00041599094,0.0018846026,0.0008614964,0.005738737,0.0006850342,0.0021841314,0.0016624327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031176116,0.00048594933,0.0006844279,0.0007964574,0.0046988516,0.0055132625,0.0022252505,0.0022553822,0.00047016356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073904183,0.00056900916,0.2238808,0.0006369326,0.00040911132,0.001181697,0.541666,0.0015458631,0.02978669,0.055271603,0.004950594,0.1393626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028163247,0.0008814194,0.25852126,0.000672371,0.00032321978,0.004308728,0.50458956,0.018147798,0.009797972,0.1551893,0.04677216,0.00051454327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008241534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093790825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006156498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007870421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006737673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032559097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766439719","doi":"","title":"Context effects in explanation evaluation - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Narrative; Recall; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Plot (graphics); Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; History; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02109351497195494,"score_gpt":0.2759000787834067,"score_spread":0.2548065638114518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766439719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97061116,0.0023919488,0.0039793393,0.0010831149,0.00005227058,0.00012400991,0.00010499832,0.000114731,0.02153845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974367,0.00025558055,0.0014939342,0.000051241594,0.000012331028,0.00003552944,0.00003501111,0.000019977859,0.00065962813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430156,0.004211394,0.00023549313,0.0003785748,0.00067263335,0.00020035468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231103,0.066714,0.004818402,0.0023748274,0.0018704038,0.0011120571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048628626,0.00027454758,0.00029320928,0.00047391962,0.0006734094,0.002007327,0.0005853379,0.0008213855,0.010411969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069754615,0.0003290846,0.00038146295,0.0003542813,0.0007456647,0.003665836,0.001895138,0.00085624284,0.00042457652],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013010462,0.0035168284,0.22571573,0.0052249813,0.0010150963,0.0028295119,0.07193375,0.0063512474,0.033446625,0.033147477,0.006178351,0.59763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001210084,0.005104363,0.83122313,0.0014768103,0.0014934592,0.0022022445,0.031888615,0.017148048,0.021527683,0.049849346,0.036593255,0.0002830062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011454921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001380515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010411969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090186426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005486437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034831524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766587004","doi":"","title":"Symposium: Creative Cognition - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Cognitive science; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Psychology; Discipline; Sociology; Social science; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.023097556773147714,"score_gpt":0.3206316003032523,"score_spread":0.29753404353010454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766587004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039595575,0.12062945,0.007837903,0.12931333,0.1563853,0.000091941605,0.0003806417,0.0007830143,0.5806189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06036291,0.043829616,0.0037164236,0.010982025,0.060573403,0.00017174182,0.00047943342,0.00071589195,0.8191685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811506,0.0005285784,0.00008420582,0.00033640146,0.00062228466,0.000313433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973258,0.00057794363,0.0001201429,0.00028023394,0.0005380191,0.0011578964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00271513,0.0012434466,0.0008700088,0.0013337827,0.0025807691,0.008581931,0.0016887793,0.0038342096,0.13971189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040130024,0.00033995925,0.0011867812,0.0011481789,0.0020030807,0.006605016,0.0054601342,0.0048207594,0.038816407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050287555,0.00006436798,0.00012962524,0.00019038147,0.000011990004,0.00006943516,0.00070603035,0.0001264563,0.00034567126,0.04091556,0.88416654,0.07322367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055212154,0.000022461225,0.00022369657,0.00017600914,0.0000043020023,0.000087253815,0.00031831043,0.00008914496,0.00012117725,0.009335307,0.98960984,0.0000070578435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059678283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011295177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13971189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023858992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001984875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46738285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766625588","doi":"","title":"Perceptual Fluency Affects Categorization Decisions - eScholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Fluency; Psychology; Perception; Subliminal stimuli; Cognitive psychology; Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Processing fluency; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.06612104346031418,"score_gpt":0.3239434146971014,"score_spread":0.25782237123678725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766625588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974807,0.00004767023,0.00018728622,0.0000847752,0.000016884705,0.0000046635346,0.000019379984,0.000010003407,0.002148722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982476,0.000038756432,0.0002745305,0.00005501753,0.000007896851,0.000007123638,0.000033391814,0.000010200151,0.0013254017],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955124,0.00015002333,0.000031921685,0.000092150425,0.00010965887,0.000064963046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918794,0.004978809,0.0014052981,0.00050866825,0.00037026562,0.000857607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084432494,0.00016427941,0.00015962598,0.0001923507,0.00022707172,0.0009800306,0.00016261448,0.00056501036,0.00906727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009395412,0.00015922071,0.00014024001,0.00008445513,0.00031794165,0.00052272907,0.00042086077,0.00060888636,0.0006696095],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019491624,0.0067277066,0.37114298,0.00034453033,0.00024148254,0.0012486377,0.0038060218,0.0018284497,0.45665044,0.0034964683,0.005265453,0.12975627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004397088,0.0033660121,0.95789564,0.000057679554,0.00012496184,0.000708838,0.000980148,0.005566588,0.022581974,0.005909057,0.0023156458,0.00005383678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006464953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067067356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00906727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023441458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001734492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030333042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766979989","doi":"","title":"Prospective Memory Tasks in Aviation: Effects of Age and Working Memory - eScholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prospective memory; Context (archaeology); Working memory; Psychology; Cognition; Transactive memory; Cognitive psychology; History","score_opus":0.024808637110895333,"score_gpt":0.2735282907827558,"score_spread":0.24871965367186047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766979989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99863225,0.0004574345,0.0001589294,0.00003387806,0.000011990483,0.000025587333,0.000082045335,0.000005513163,0.0005924304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976109,0.00034462486,0.00041707323,0.00004019641,0.000016645661,0.00006615093,0.00024264897,0.000008666347,0.0012530647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894255,0.00028210247,0.00016458421,0.00016637714,0.00035042205,0.00009395263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97690046,0.010668168,0.0063691847,0.0014084197,0.0021860732,0.0024677247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003952262,0.0005362519,0.00048706768,0.0005521491,0.0004404849,0.0011912,0.00071967463,0.0006122146,0.002125774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019238532,0.0002991685,0.00043936563,0.00035260431,0.0004655857,0.0010606414,0.0008113996,0.00089070614,0.0006576772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004761458,0.0027503353,0.93883985,0.00012588248,0.000294135,0.00019702781,0.0038195185,0.00067799893,0.0051564607,0.000118343756,0.00070248713,0.04255652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003289663,0.0015495489,0.99643445,0.000025202959,0.00003130585,0.0001241931,0.0003428542,0.00037809394,0.0005167385,0.00010798083,0.0004383755,0.000018363085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039115245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005444589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003952262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037441208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043322227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0209018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767003055","doi":"","title":"A General Purpose Architecture for Building Spiking Neuron Models of Biological Cognition - eScholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Advanced Memory and Neural Computing","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Cognitive architecture; Object (grammar); Phrase; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Cognitive model; Cognitive science; Psychology; Programming language; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.028970608555352044,"score_gpt":0.26149861051059703,"score_spread":0.23252800195524498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767003055","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009290455,0.00010555004,0.98130566,0.00018799631,0.000037420396,0.000048689923,0.00010312641,0.0023751182,0.0065460023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24171872,0.00048548233,0.7400001,0.00018633444,0.00004329752,0.000446812,0.00059532135,0.00064892636,0.015874952],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986684,0.000029316152,0.000010688571,0.000024239038,0.000051424766,0.000017532271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997768,0.000068765425,0.000010682483,0.000060644197,0.00006307424,0.000020053281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003854741,0.00054860185,0.00049714715,0.0003380756,0.0005105498,0.00096338807,0.002230472,0.0010007127,0.010857166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001005732,0.0004979472,0.0014635664,0.00036675157,0.00055623095,0.0015825967,0.0009857645,0.0011735997,0.0026029514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001491684,0.000090449845,0.00090346264,0.0001873226,0.00011515633,0.00026255366,0.00025382178,0.6599227,0.0135174,0.17404023,0.008947923,0.1416098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013399028,0.000022112361,0.000069225105,0.0000103454095,0.000014745974,0.000034292614,0.00000949569,0.9443769,0.002043683,0.0462389,0.007159147,0.000007750319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029948826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045506866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010857166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005281606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006068419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036320806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767108711","doi":"","title":"ACT-R models of a delayed match-to sample task - eScholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Advanced Memory and Neural Computing","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Sample (material); Cognition; Psychology; Object (grammar); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Management","score_opus":0.01631619629148564,"score_gpt":0.24747417005531383,"score_spread":0.23115797376382818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767108711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04395507,0.00077366637,0.9075324,0.0017381773,0.00027805864,0.000682177,0.0012625764,0.0012566459,0.042521253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62197495,0.0008135846,0.29593146,0.000520142,0.00018617767,0.0027165604,0.0017920615,0.00055092014,0.075514115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730897,0.00108556,0.00018170217,0.0007031933,0.00045730043,0.00026336848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909864,0.0044321404,0.001077886,0.0014004731,0.0012528237,0.0008502979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045477864,0.0018446074,0.0012333661,0.0010600807,0.00077013834,0.0032085807,0.0038764991,0.00224749,0.027280912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013431838,0.0012697333,0.002225567,0.0010657395,0.0014269834,0.0036364307,0.0020330197,0.0024887328,0.0087956805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016390516,0.0007605771,0.005904185,0.0005008425,0.00029138356,0.000809446,0.0013077649,0.21075687,0.007815791,0.6661974,0.0096021835,0.09441454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017620923,0.00036206853,0.0016480671,0.000052521013,0.00009460627,0.00032564966,0.00008280701,0.7609054,0.0009317851,0.22681443,0.008531769,0.0000747413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007890159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053200643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027280912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017029317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022824134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09126371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767120360","doi":"","title":"An Agent-based Simulation of the Effectiveness of Creative Leadership - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Diversity (politics); Creative problem-solving; Convergence (economics); Management; Engineering; Operations research; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03346930485918941,"score_gpt":0.29550925390521504,"score_spread":0.2620399490460256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767120360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6825867,0.00043443058,0.08854885,0.0036559757,0.00043367347,0.0005218783,0.0011749823,0.0005972737,0.22204608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735661,0.00014050696,0.01378223,0.00012695634,0.000015962018,0.00025808704,0.00021850465,0.000050822677,0.011840763],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996246,0.00017742396,0.000016459431,0.00003964701,0.00007255131,0.00006933989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969023,0.0020080435,0.00016639811,0.0001841076,0.00024208798,0.00049711944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008771974,0.00047401132,0.00043075046,0.00068243133,0.0011741683,0.0013665031,0.0011911824,0.0017072578,0.028427325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049126334,0.00031699945,0.0006584803,0.00045559986,0.00095605163,0.0015205229,0.0016445724,0.0011065671,0.0008774239],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028738688,0.00032494045,0.0030610193,0.000093209426,0.000054720633,0.0003281911,0.00045118446,0.9181882,0.00084297254,0.06703322,0.0034167033,0.0059182583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023728353,0.0001635957,0.00086086587,0.000034968263,0.000019106557,0.000049424594,0.0002527422,0.9718875,0.00029629824,0.020776762,0.0053978297,0.000023660145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011196298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008510703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028427325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014055723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015187314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09509891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767453778","doi":"","title":"Talking it up: How the function of rising declaratives depends on prolongations and listeners' expectations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Variation (astronomy); Psychology; Australian English; Phrase; Linguistics; Comprehension; Function (biology); Geography","score_opus":0.03491838984701807,"score_gpt":0.334791512956865,"score_spread":0.29987312310984693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767453778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95341384,0.00049479736,0.012636873,0.00047276347,0.00006236911,0.00005415183,0.00010266123,0.00013953606,0.032623008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956905,0.00015314593,0.0028247165,0.00014710495,0.000021949185,0.00003820008,0.00007173822,0.00013744603,0.0009152727],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796957,0.0008736416,0.00008594038,0.0003631098,0.0005257788,0.00018187871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053175,0.014016483,0.0017258557,0.0011156881,0.0017233016,0.00088691886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036697967,0.0005053906,0.0004105825,0.00071969384,0.0007634298,0.005481299,0.0009514644,0.0012804734,0.0037602372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035154857,0.00096669525,0.00043674264,0.00039415664,0.0022604538,0.004917524,0.0021084002,0.0020147027,0.0007516039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041522034,0.00038415228,0.093080245,0.00083816994,0.00021816949,0.0024354828,0.17748265,0.004222404,0.5413561,0.054666862,0.0021381406,0.11902543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044743606,0.0019226064,0.7363181,0.0006088944,0.0006048102,0.0030182083,0.060717724,0.037491556,0.06212747,0.08481692,0.011095768,0.0008305211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003167948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020351743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005481299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060859544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054278376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019407988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776180143","doi":"","title":"Lies in Conversation: An Examination of Deception Using Automated Linguistic Analysis - eScholarship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Communication source; Psychology; Deception; Ambivalence; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science; Literature; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0318352520955604,"score_gpt":0.34224769244297026,"score_spread":0.3104124403474099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776180143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606191,0.0010823115,0.021450011,0.00068682886,0.000024726014,0.0004357319,0.00030775822,0.000087121356,0.015306411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827436,0.0005152862,0.014994648,0.00020832256,0.000031007585,0.00036596876,0.00024381517,0.000025431891,0.0008718473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913641,0.0046437313,0.0007242733,0.0004888374,0.0024912085,0.00028773988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299286,0.044276107,0.013014111,0.0036087325,0.008554085,0.0006183633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008052277,0.00043368895,0.00034454348,0.0074993856,0.0018325077,0.003251508,0.0010894296,0.0009248833,0.0013336062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040708937,0.0003113054,0.0005312848,0.003667423,0.002401628,0.0047306316,0.0037677526,0.001595325,0.00039218532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039327334,0.0007565607,0.30679426,0.001467817,0.00025509865,0.0020985012,0.40973347,0.002059171,0.015555954,0.017089488,0.0019205248,0.24187596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040183415,0.00063050305,0.71470994,0.0010710852,0.00019338727,0.0041615707,0.20062068,0.02373366,0.010328797,0.021230746,0.023052823,0.0002266455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031558732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003692062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008052277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011370459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011841147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042585015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777339208","doi":"","title":"On-line Reference Assignment for Anaphoric and Non-Anaphoric Nouns: A Unified, Memory-Based Model in ACT-R - eScholarship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Noun; Proposition; Linguistics; Computer science; Proper noun; Noun phrase; Cognitive science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03825501678868466,"score_gpt":0.3235939993050299,"score_spread":0.28533898251634526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777339208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06346927,0.0015273291,0.8582527,0.0037861865,0.0002915038,0.00021321148,0.00044581236,0.0007601104,0.07125394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.749411,0.0009967776,0.21404548,0.0004946862,0.00037721524,0.00029853202,0.0007614109,0.00045022988,0.033164844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958384,0.0015028429,0.0003407235,0.0009959622,0.0010196205,0.0003024272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906063,0.003370866,0.0008749346,0.0024511926,0.0020515923,0.0006450643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005027901,0.0008472811,0.001318607,0.0033380713,0.0018601284,0.009944777,0.006779402,0.004088528,0.0119589055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018927297,0.00156274,0.0024933892,0.0031908432,0.005429464,0.024901945,0.004267045,0.00238,0.0043126442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019849167,0.00012796362,0.0024952115,0.00011348306,0.000059325135,0.00036195418,0.0029821196,0.02056856,0.0012178144,0.91291165,0.0030522328,0.05591128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067339126,0.00012526658,0.0013805652,0.00007160451,0.000093619594,0.00055271294,0.000727995,0.23855588,0.0015251843,0.74733657,0.009470135,0.00009317619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012924657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060249693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012924657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003366003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020928513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04000652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778934366","doi":"","title":"Dueling Theories: Thought Experiments in Cognitive Science - eScholarship","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thought experiment; Narrative; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.045103569255898694,"score_gpt":0.31227094882319867,"score_spread":0.26716737956729997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778934366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031539515,0.022256786,0.7420727,0.07033096,0.0023584075,0.00058631075,0.00019774941,0.0007938089,0.12986389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136175,0.0058532525,0.26454803,0.0047671073,0.0015876951,0.0019158932,0.00013866737,0.00032110227,0.0072507923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95122296,0.041017547,0.001135721,0.0026528346,0.0033110615,0.00065983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77226657,0.20711468,0.0052590067,0.0101762,0.0037962813,0.001387389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060964834,0.0012058181,0.0014788483,0.0048692795,0.005123593,0.010609725,0.0030700997,0.006356085,0.009240636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11441151,0.0010672555,0.0022723523,0.003611817,0.073451504,0.04056433,0.0073290197,0.009702349,0.0008407179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015429168,0.000012008195,0.000077574405,0.00005877987,0.0000075332637,0.000026983109,0.0016318224,0.00023072847,0.000036977013,0.99319553,0.00062289176,0.004083729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017784487,0.000006652812,0.000030797455,0.00004117164,0.000002667679,0.000017255736,0.00017673259,0.00046187663,0.000036925696,0.99657106,0.0026307388,0.0000063665766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011401284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070571556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060964834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067168525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00295277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32241672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779363679","doi":"","title":"Judgements of relative order: Mechanisms underlying subspan versus supraspan lists - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Psychology; Ceiling (cloud); Noun; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Computer science","score_opus":0.05493123086793266,"score_gpt":0.3185742690730038,"score_spread":0.2636430382050711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779363679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96011,0.0005610158,0.021507667,0.00040224224,0.000108256914,0.00010031606,0.00022181547,0.00027131668,0.016717369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901792,0.00021760985,0.0067349155,0.00010507301,0.00003477367,0.00003212109,0.00016914969,0.00007606053,0.0024510836],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850994,0.00016092454,0.00008845066,0.00038487848,0.0006897093,0.00016614879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890537,0.0032038519,0.0027534417,0.0020122884,0.0022326992,0.0007439733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015384122,0.00029303096,0.0004489669,0.00095666846,0.00065494905,0.002749312,0.0010734269,0.0008421314,0.0060902205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015043265,0.000474986,0.0004138239,0.0006625664,0.0012717806,0.0028155996,0.0019240909,0.0009289512,0.0010251362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018825143,0.00044380655,0.05617512,0.0005019265,0.00017751253,0.00067820755,0.005732178,0.0040548923,0.69742817,0.034085374,0.0027046052,0.19613568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022125484,0.0015082379,0.67776316,0.0002155667,0.00024354368,0.0011945108,0.0026375437,0.049912594,0.16824219,0.089650325,0.008125598,0.00028540648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030452309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022742904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060902205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073079474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006707068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020373821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780322822","doi":"","title":"Learning verb alternations in a usage-based Bayesian model - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Language acquisition; Linguistics; Syntax; Natural language processing; Argument (complex analysis); Class (philosophy); Inference; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013890282950420371,"score_gpt":0.2939145526330915,"score_spread":0.28002426968267113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780322822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16531251,0.0003310707,0.82611036,0.0023059475,0.000031681193,0.00009495041,0.00043532078,0.00035780465,0.0050203525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.846875,0.0003652862,0.14348528,0.00045785768,0.000063775304,0.0003087882,0.00068885414,0.00014073444,0.0076143877],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829274,0.00085238944,0.00010671739,0.0004054789,0.00019951013,0.00014313361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825333,0.014597514,0.000910759,0.00087723014,0.0007030944,0.0003780287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048498926,0.0006882869,0.0016342704,0.0011453469,0.00082850887,0.0024156878,0.0028381015,0.0024152363,0.005444039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020198124,0.0012305545,0.0022981141,0.0010955073,0.0025793803,0.005502316,0.0021877475,0.0035909314,0.0006705419],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032607382,0.00015460179,0.00830782,0.00014944046,0.0001417406,0.00031571204,0.0011166553,0.6079323,0.0014010064,0.32489717,0.002078908,0.053178556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002687779,0.000025436848,0.00032633494,0.000016499733,0.000016236572,0.000038056645,0.000025829537,0.87664676,0.00015284657,0.12229032,0.000416833,0.000018002438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01175824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015064561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01175824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002342663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012179316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025649011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781038358","doi":"","title":"The Development of Numeracy: Fingers Count! - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numeracy; Psychology; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.021684081208481018,"score_gpt":0.2973987282085043,"score_spread":0.2757146470000233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781038358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54270434,0.010839556,0.020290922,0.018086579,0.00067141623,0.00009193255,0.0013905999,0.0011024692,0.4048222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91082996,0.0047022076,0.011551076,0.00056133093,0.000053020573,0.000049475686,0.00027172937,0.00016289752,0.07181847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996753,0.000050143673,0.0000140480815,0.000054346725,0.00015255602,0.000053696203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873227,0.00020156366,0.0001752231,0.0001145408,0.00045459013,0.00032180827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005376972,0.00023409342,0.00019255313,0.0007174361,0.0007728232,0.0021890472,0.00041755772,0.00036582377,0.010835684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034656164,0.00020242453,0.00009512411,0.00051297055,0.0021471085,0.0014260304,0.0013281823,0.0009586931,0.0021128824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015920673,0.00012906289,0.16485922,0.00020283578,0.000016318072,0.00081373565,0.007835369,0.00038325138,0.010814509,0.06393496,0.06610592,0.6847456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016721433,0.00018458339,0.63854545,0.0005540318,0.000020117379,0.002470627,0.0060626986,0.0008181569,0.010041561,0.044514287,0.29669237,0.000079344056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02930898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061354462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02930898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015719045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017540926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058276772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781278576","doi":"","title":"Modeling The Fan Effect Using Dynamically Structured Holographic Memory - eScholarship","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Recall; Cognitive science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Cognition; Representation (politics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034318377749431854,"score_gpt":0.2856306274619525,"score_spread":0.25131224971252064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781278576","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3501666,0.0008324374,0.60605466,0.0012146999,0.00023031235,0.00017500999,0.00044702517,0.00058081915,0.040298503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641765,0.00027913682,0.028764332,0.000100138546,0.00003933141,0.00010064779,0.000094750605,0.00007008774,0.0063752085],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999813,0.000052610365,0.000010240592,0.00003056792,0.00004144597,0.000052110667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985837,0.0008459877,0.0001885518,0.00015577323,0.00011458166,0.00011142596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008886576,0.00038802729,0.00052010216,0.00063016865,0.000384789,0.0010719069,0.0014218945,0.001218527,0.0073372712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033100417,0.0003454636,0.0008765537,0.0004470827,0.00083935156,0.0022092715,0.0012297988,0.00078237674,0.00039798138],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022828394,0.00019951786,0.002926438,0.00007570374,0.00005063138,0.00050417474,0.0002214654,0.74602616,0.004173058,0.2263415,0.001699791,0.017553387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002272799,0.000023599025,0.00027695755,0.0000046834634,0.0000075658636,0.000027149259,0.00001576248,0.9804174,0.0002999361,0.018459203,0.0004369913,0.000008069165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008049729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058942367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008049729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008645369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084179005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02454561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782054346","doi":"","title":"Success in Theory of Mind - eScholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; False belief; Psychology; Perception; Theory of mind; Task (project management); Cognition; Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015101984780082593,"score_gpt":0.29906983344945576,"score_spread":0.2839678486693732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782054346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2123639,0.0040498157,0.15364087,0.031063795,0.00069794996,0.00015237919,0.00017266658,0.0005950817,0.59726363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96620375,0.000771937,0.023681564,0.0007337067,0.00011544361,0.000086589935,0.00013653464,0.00015023367,0.008120281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267876,0.0040385225,0.0003139093,0.00089672697,0.0015239227,0.0005481148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715318,0.013238086,0.0024788496,0.00611792,0.003755886,0.0028774266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102600325,0.00046035723,0.000475845,0.0014786391,0.0014770777,0.005897791,0.0011479734,0.0013747404,0.009982363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03482486,0.0002544898,0.0005657843,0.0009826224,0.0066338694,0.007889107,0.004408104,0.0020927766,0.0017508769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046560875,0.00010024304,0.008950151,0.000102149126,0.00006434255,0.00016410496,0.0027900436,0.0012935174,0.0003601322,0.91645753,0.007814546,0.06185666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023673854,0.000050039842,0.0034290522,0.00012379597,0.000026271977,0.00016153845,0.00086527213,0.005119401,0.0005749064,0.95503604,0.034573626,0.000016327584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007419028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093183614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102600325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020816866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018374597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05426085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28317371","doi":"10.1021/acsami.7b02700","title":"Why does explaining help learning? Insight from an explanation impairment effect","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Regional Development Fund; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Phenomenon; Learning theory; Psychology of learning; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013502957855595975,"score_gpt":0.31033601554342233,"score_spread":0.29683305768782636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28317371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09793039,0.015410058,0.023204053,0.6064676,0.0019402583,0.0001801138,0.0009163628,0.0004956365,0.25345552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586886,0.005049289,0.0045026965,0.017145075,0.00067295285,0.0000878094,0.00022608072,0.00010938338,0.013518146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726886,0.0014998085,0.000087048546,0.00037912093,0.00032488463,0.0004402859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847002,0.009085049,0.0012977672,0.0013851539,0.0018699309,0.0016618106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006124099,0.00062406715,0.00048162884,0.0011786383,0.002119001,0.004552,0.0015313602,0.002961971,0.02171318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022616325,0.00025125794,0.00047058612,0.0007762652,0.010459196,0.010844279,0.0043368004,0.0030130537,0.0019416219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033825255,0.0003469943,0.037061557,0.00065470516,0.00016889385,0.0018888788,0.020842321,0.0011385505,0.0006612178,0.67261094,0.10080006,0.16348758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099778736,0.00009259814,0.0077134776,0.000578967,0.0000724537,0.0012066155,0.0113864,0.0021603769,0.0006438447,0.82855296,0.14743078,0.00006170425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005653107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037421482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02171318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031529975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035194613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0726378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963112087","doi":"","title":"An Agent-based Simulation of the Effectiveness of Creative Leadership","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Imitation; Action (physics); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Computer science; Management; Knowledge management; Economics; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02935987049575929,"score_gpt":0.31947046379913613,"score_spread":0.29011059330337685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963112087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523824,0.000115179915,0.02793508,0.00037302542,0.000048332273,0.00010847024,0.00014138095,0.00008631967,0.018809749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914984,0.000046716577,0.0070145843,0.000030369963,0.00000427364,0.00008504075,0.000048487436,0.000009798959,0.0012622754],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958557,0.00024313253,0.000014326177,0.000036640995,0.00005171764,0.00006864974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578154,0.0032199519,0.00021814801,0.0001808697,0.0002412158,0.00035820258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012909545,0.00038376197,0.000432052,0.0005384414,0.0005674225,0.0010497291,0.00078689284,0.0009779955,0.0033694904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006569133,0.0002547112,0.00035261927,0.00042936933,0.0008194185,0.0009109223,0.00096433266,0.00069409976,0.00017953619],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002514376,0.00019679444,0.0033548714,0.000048347018,0.00004154024,0.00012337581,0.00023562218,0.97622615,0.0008841518,0.015283535,0.00039446348,0.002959684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066799235,0.0000863848,0.0003240053,0.000005488196,0.000006535126,0.000008145841,0.000049493305,0.9961701,0.00014609525,0.0027626285,0.0003681285,0.000006188767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062489477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004406491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062489477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009893422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010282428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012425184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}