{"meta":{"query_hash":"7995a8b4463d","filters":{"venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7995a8b4463d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Proceedings+of+the+Design+Society+DESIGN+Conference"},"results":[{"id":"W3034396759","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.71","title":"ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSET DEVELOPMENT IN BUSINESS AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION – AN EXPERIMENT","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference","topic":"Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Entrepreneurship; Entrepreneurial education; Perception; Test (biology); Management; Psychology; Entrepreneurship education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05448584421545178,"score_gpt":0.2747577236506977,"score_spread":0.22027187943524595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034396759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984748,0.000006865102,0.00010806334,0.000029271288,0.000012291401,0.00045244716,0.000034962883,0.000004780047,0.0008765494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887736,0.000040387145,0.0017766048,0.00015315722,0.000028520319,0.0024325517,0.000113776405,0.000007860063,0.006673448],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974855,0.0005929509,0.00014826558,0.00045122317,0.00065202615,0.0006699949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904626,0.0044305557,0.0006013124,0.0009810041,0.0007684099,0.002756076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038155904,0.00063977286,0.0008672688,0.0005106121,0.002906713,0.0018679597,0.0013413376,0.001570096,0.007855941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006706427,0.0008295529,0.0005113398,0.000441457,0.0016394304,0.0011232755,0.0018954824,0.0027251109,0.00090246036],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040375978,0.72001207,0.03538413,0.0003858512,0.000113372334,0.0008617221,0.043398388,0.0014829338,0.10449421,0.0033006028,0.0012956847,0.048895087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020312928,0.5064445,0.342894,0.00016568815,0.00026013298,0.0004951051,0.02895392,0.006479129,0.0663421,0.0064779553,0.020643324,0.00053119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045658797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006601278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007855941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013192251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027617444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02628076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034399191","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.164","title":"VOLUMETRIC CELLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR A BIO-INSPIRED GEOMETRIC MODELLING METHOD TO SUPPORT HETEROGENEOUS LATTICE STRUCTURES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference","topic":"3D Printing in Biomedical Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretization; Lattice (music); Geometric modeling; Computer science; Geometric design; Algorithm; Geometry; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.12442169785665909,"score_gpt":0.31155828417978104,"score_spread":0.18713658632312197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034399191","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009536396,0.000043530647,0.99779224,0.000040979226,0.000019203608,0.000016630089,0.000023614808,0.00022181595,0.00088825397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07259592,0.00028050304,0.92324626,0.00006671248,0.000025091678,0.00019124722,0.00015241976,0.00031250739,0.0031293118],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954337,0.000087402645,0.000022935335,0.000046099354,0.000268784,0.00003142989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964726,0.00012585727,0.00003541956,0.00007551131,0.000077945755,0.000038074988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071208115,0.0006848897,0.00054321927,0.0007723406,0.00046904042,0.0018167738,0.0022326377,0.001185356,0.0031375177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010591743,0.000478731,0.0009978028,0.0005779171,0.0012697085,0.0009104793,0.0019652767,0.0012505995,0.0014222731],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004994845,0.000053064075,0.00042039758,0.00024851985,0.000046568395,0.00031933744,0.00046514493,0.52144045,0.06275009,0.3175393,0.0033847648,0.0932824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013758058,0.000031227177,0.000064838314,0.000039502338,0.00000864816,0.00017590071,0.00004424195,0.9275995,0.008598918,0.030035734,0.03335523,0.000032517233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018582278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021682882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031375177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059274863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009235664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01049608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034439704","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.78","title":"A FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE ENGINEERING OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES (AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Process (computing); Task (project management); Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Computer science; Engineering design process; Systems engineering; Management science; Engineering; Engineering management","score_opus":0.2483408559777671,"score_gpt":0.3817186626279584,"score_spread":0.1333778066501913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034439704","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053319833,0.0022097244,0.78686124,0.08474878,0.00079582323,0.0010623323,0.00012299749,0.00024333883,0.11862382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28561512,0.0013342851,0.69471765,0.0062810765,0.00053865643,0.0028672449,0.00011027206,0.00010628524,0.008429348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9293173,0.057857003,0.0024165518,0.0029281818,0.005226263,0.002254737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945205,0.037839726,0.0033848714,0.0032162042,0.0073545263,0.002999748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.092132196,0.003132756,0.001682704,0.010218035,0.014108804,0.017967984,0.0060798726,0.018396534,0.0072894436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041937076,0.0015624155,0.0030796665,0.0035480086,0.076403156,0.016934995,0.01288691,0.013383118,0.0014142798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031866161,0.00002059021,0.00006224997,0.00003805123,0.000004197685,0.000063304484,0.0016600649,0.0012536965,0.0000528288,0.9939042,0.0010886213,0.0018489644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026676526,0.000016277807,0.000060580238,0.00028205695,0.0000072121093,0.000061167506,0.0016527114,0.003949896,0.00009208577,0.9726105,0.02121684,0.000024059838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015335186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014733923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0183033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026723538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48724747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035118309","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.160","title":"IDENTIFYING GAPS IN AUTOMATING THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference","topic":"Technology Assessment and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Automation; Maturity (psychological); Process (computing); Data science; Scale (ratio); Emerging technologies; Computer science; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.06376527906804959,"score_gpt":0.2783147213121272,"score_spread":0.21454944224407763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035118309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87608075,0.0031779718,0.08980725,0.0048132837,0.00012870895,0.00073638104,0.0034290017,0.00067532057,0.021151407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572304,0.0005834369,0.03787235,0.00024930236,0.00003878685,0.00074238627,0.0022771899,0.000055234796,0.0009508672],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568785,0.019309606,0.0080396505,0.0026436376,0.011275358,0.0018533046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65442395,0.22786273,0.03257224,0.01923523,0.06374117,0.0021646363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051065568,0.0006032955,0.0008879132,0.015849518,0.00091594097,0.0060557653,0.0018124301,0.0014880778,0.002733745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15258344,0.0004046986,0.000682888,0.012494834,0.0008723941,0.0064706034,0.0035013682,0.0012002405,0.0015478425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026155464,0.0005092263,0.46333158,0.0024685226,0.00013136113,0.0002500668,0.010754063,0.003967921,0.006893266,0.0080763865,0.004257715,0.49909833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009397087,0.001391224,0.7393127,0.0039580627,0.0002900468,0.0006473066,0.041418064,0.06355009,0.033397686,0.031801376,0.08387266,0.00026677307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005983219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070633874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051065568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021666784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007572846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27006376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035665411","doi":"10.1017/dsd.2020.274","title":"DESIGN READINESS OF MULTI-MATERIAL CONCEPTS: MANUFACTURING AND JOINING TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATED EVALUATION OF CONCEPT MATURITY LEVELS USING CARDINAL COEFFICIENTS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference","topic":"Technology Assessment and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Design for manufacturability; Maturity (psychological); Capability Maturity Model; Manufacturing engineering; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Industrial engineering; Process management; Systems engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.11852735429937471,"score_gpt":0.29581108748747587,"score_spread":0.17728373318810114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035665411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84370196,0.00016758544,0.1460234,0.00005978749,0.000016599251,0.00023727145,0.0005204027,0.00020090718,0.009072167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96287405,0.00005195157,0.03605419,0.000004183199,0.0000026050732,0.000102656355,0.00034537708,0.00001770475,0.00054719206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758315,0.00080163695,0.00018902293,0.00015154116,0.0011065846,0.00016807465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888974,0.0045845066,0.0017142488,0.00077901344,0.0034474602,0.0005773186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004730753,0.00051121524,0.0003210185,0.004905559,0.000296813,0.0013920367,0.00046204033,0.00034423912,0.0012305551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01285865,0.00024538656,0.000505779,0.0019069285,0.00032505786,0.0013901812,0.0013039378,0.0006659422,0.0003390289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016794734,0.00052837055,0.47816613,0.0005646359,0.00026621274,0.00018237153,0.0016153756,0.15041518,0.06484694,0.017826078,0.0013023461,0.28260702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051235857,0.0020727806,0.4041058,0.00017294726,0.00016328783,0.00022917535,0.00209071,0.51165944,0.06379379,0.0102049615,0.0052070087,0.00024887975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015914008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018710678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004905559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079460203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087446225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02501887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}