{"meta":{"query_hash":"fc2f393627f6","filters":{"venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fc2f393627f6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Proceedings+of+the+Institution+of+Mechanical+Engineers+Part+O+Journal+of+Risk+and+Reliability"},"results":[{"id":"W1969461147","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr212","title":"A series—parallel redundant reliability system for cellular manufacturing design","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Iran National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Computer science; Integer programming; Production (economics); Series and parallel circuits; Series (stratigraphy); Cellular manufacturing; Order (exchange); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008441203112898027,"score_gpt":0.19802174058087077,"score_spread":0.18958053746797274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969461147","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026545187,0.0003287806,0.96534294,0.000126349,0.00003529328,0.00006083569,0.0000785113,0.00016931373,0.0073127807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7605583,0.00071379717,0.22875766,0.000076203636,0.000053754906,0.0003568183,0.00017566336,0.000060514973,0.009247315],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996517,0.00014334609,0.000010346224,0.0000598457,0.00009466459,0.000040093146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980325,0.00007561274,0.00004883192,0.000017120476,0.0000414613,0.000013720343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050849083,0.0009347711,0.00069430156,0.00048932934,0.00038784771,0.0008033713,0.0009072302,0.00076636986,0.0027584617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006874868,0.00039683332,0.00074753235,0.00064497424,0.00044908808,0.00048791527,0.00055380934,0.00065026165,0.00039306996],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020435918,0.000012242302,0.00010308712,0.000034668905,0.000008769075,0.000054230597,0.000017588862,0.9856044,0.000880595,0.00714927,0.00026714755,0.0058476822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006271256,0.000040795643,0.000037652557,0.0000042045,0.000009302435,0.000024664765,0.0000070046567,0.9968258,0.00023681165,0.0019527893,0.0008510891,0.0000036805616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028904523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034109177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028904523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009229757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089853804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009227991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977543843","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr307","title":"Human reliability: Benchmark and prediction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Human reliability; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Reliability (semiconductor); Human error; Reliability engineering; Machine learning; Risk assessment; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.014876068078469768,"score_gpt":0.27486121255589085,"score_spread":0.2599851444774211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977543843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34240684,0.0036893259,0.6284716,0.0006270182,0.0003535235,0.00044171477,0.0017554943,0.0022107558,0.020043684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203083,0.0006732341,0.07561435,0.00006232761,0.00010794683,0.00025298327,0.0013014746,0.00010432018,0.0015751472],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919687,0.0026925467,0.00037876522,0.0007498837,0.003983409,0.00022673448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852246,0.006601392,0.0014134826,0.0032154657,0.0032695455,0.00027552646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008039611,0.000925358,0.0007592881,0.0029144417,0.00030194828,0.001297856,0.0014021278,0.001108359,0.00104417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029609008,0.00018181813,0.00053588295,0.0015168152,0.0008778835,0.0012006419,0.0012142134,0.0009024462,0.0004067074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006589191,0.00061852304,0.038991153,0.0007312489,0.00025628158,0.00021294138,0.000535238,0.47614104,0.013831243,0.0178425,0.0076690814,0.4425119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004103892,0.0016612008,0.04384965,0.00017929832,0.000057214573,0.00036019436,0.00020627392,0.91458994,0.018811788,0.014132715,0.0059946924,0.00011602431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00275698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016963974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008039611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008562604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007871497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04251802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979344695","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr160","title":"Single-objective deterministic versus multi-objective stochastic water network design: Practical considerations for the water industry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Pareto principle; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Network planning and design; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto analysis; Flexibility (engineering); Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03972253696518675,"score_gpt":0.24410622523600503,"score_spread":0.20438368827081826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979344695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030326791,0.0009921085,0.96434027,0.0006765438,0.000038508235,0.0000822401,0.000047511385,0.00009579604,0.003400246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7076273,0.001590981,0.28745428,0.00019551204,0.00005277599,0.00031100606,0.000076509525,0.00007487273,0.0026167356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832445,0.0009391424,0.00006727253,0.00015904778,0.00043567477,0.00007443834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716264,0.0021489365,0.00022907028,0.00009904088,0.0002929767,0.00006725669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913178,0.00066360907,0.001158957,0.0006066238,0.00037827838,0.0012002891,0.0010039997,0.0011757951,0.0016464078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005904897,0.0007333789,0.0009122798,0.00063901965,0.0008532058,0.0013655494,0.0007694139,0.0009455073,0.00016981183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020619998,0.000010227137,0.00026669214,0.00007114656,0.000015495345,0.000022015493,0.000011896078,0.97972566,0.00045617006,0.005891109,0.00010659107,0.013402336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009719424,0.000057994424,0.00017512617,0.000015790045,0.000007842317,0.000015241765,0.00001348522,0.991667,0.00033737964,0.0070444625,0.00064804876,0.000007927922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026172628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045696525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003913178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001159042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016860667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02069509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983466952","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr266","title":"Wind power modelling and the determination of capacity credit in an electric power system","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Electric power system; Wind speed; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Environmental science; Electric power; Power (physics); Computer science; Meteorology; Automotive engineering; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.0067246090579162554,"score_gpt":0.19060570902267307,"score_spread":0.18388109996475682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983466952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7986919,0.00030412522,0.1943942,0.00027825392,0.000021950475,0.000052148414,0.00021163296,0.00020954091,0.005836156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969331,0.000055704208,0.0024387375,0.0000047666626,0.0000036291674,0.000009559813,0.000046658333,0.000008978379,0.0004988095],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966276,0.00015341546,0.000025152673,0.000040466202,0.00008184804,0.00003638065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981554,0.0013246026,0.00027663595,0.00008607738,0.00012463146,0.000032705084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085218775,0.00055804045,0.0003653616,0.00060797686,0.00022884006,0.0009227559,0.00046976577,0.0005946134,0.0007657219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059669656,0.0003163989,0.00029425885,0.00062246894,0.0006119807,0.0010450598,0.00044283518,0.0005737826,0.00011810644],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024214405,0.000009377701,0.0024012374,0.0000065911627,0.000008622219,0.0000615708,0.000018144488,0.9919258,0.00036443133,0.0027999114,0.00005442347,0.0023256938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030136023,0.000011505392,0.0012277904,0.0000031050681,0.0000035532726,0.00001891997,0.000011805438,0.9964561,0.00014643768,0.0020319878,0.000081083635,0.000004765804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018937629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012805285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018937629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079151226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006961756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037654757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990280946","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr24","title":"Minimizing maintenance cost involving flow-time and tardiness penalty with unequal release dates","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Tardiness; Schedule; Scheduling (production processes); Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Minification; Retard; Due date; Job shop scheduling; Mathematics; Reliability engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.0056777393329820024,"score_gpt":0.19609202833350778,"score_spread":0.1904142890005258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990280946","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11326546,0.0005499212,0.88312155,0.0001445739,0.000048893442,0.000041569947,0.000042639356,0.00017572599,0.0026097365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7911301,0.0002948068,0.20583811,0.000035937257,0.000063424406,0.000086130356,0.0000824361,0.00011727745,0.0023516705],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994211,0.00015219813,0.000035153404,0.00009561876,0.00020105737,0.000094821466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871194,0.00080542814,0.000207437,0.00009866905,0.00011235073,0.000064150336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009615655,0.0008436273,0.00085304043,0.0006082826,0.00030503093,0.0007180322,0.001005412,0.00043116475,0.001052156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039543384,0.00023051088,0.0003583555,0.0005467122,0.00038072653,0.0009711606,0.00042368984,0.0005277731,0.00017440492],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002715668,0.00014123892,0.0015114557,0.00016436506,0.000055137945,0.00011326192,0.00006458278,0.88352716,0.010102549,0.02090784,0.0007035256,0.082437344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003416411,0.00022105062,0.00136387,0.00001257801,0.000041107884,0.00015858306,0.000021437378,0.9825561,0.0060182363,0.0083012665,0.0012573902,0.000014296669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009148127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007470588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001052156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056765944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008572498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005085349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996330381","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr90","title":"Impacts of repair state residence time distributions in an electric power generating capacity adequacy assessment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Electric power system; Computer science; State (computer science); Power system simulation; Power (physics); Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.006789851987170005,"score_gpt":0.22911412539359136,"score_spread":0.22232427340642136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996330381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535091,0.000097477554,0.043184873,0.00014694758,0.000007159403,0.000049172246,0.00013732532,0.0002741049,0.0025938768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982407,0.00001625361,0.0014418343,0.00000868733,0.0000017747376,0.0000072915877,0.000045081586,0.0000143331235,0.00022412653],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979122,0.000998797,0.00008857737,0.00021535503,0.00057905086,0.00020587708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508291,0.04084302,0.002992444,0.002103029,0.002791279,0.00044106573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006190968,0.00044680876,0.000558801,0.0011068828,0.00040481053,0.0012808028,0.0007131273,0.0008482772,0.0019100369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028857514,0.0003984529,0.0004845552,0.00086411944,0.0011017659,0.0021001226,0.00094564166,0.0010482745,0.00017497106],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009525544,0.00014986692,0.028343651,0.000031486245,0.000052004656,0.0003418789,0.00024037078,0.9446133,0.0037279434,0.0070992587,0.0002178007,0.014229945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026645856,0.00038874976,0.017511591,0.000012245029,0.00003725628,0.00020056851,0.00022547148,0.9720743,0.0053689606,0.0038160405,0.00030286273,0.000035432135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00549923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050729853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006190968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017278354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006349098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032741368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016141565","doi":"10.1177/1748006x11419071","title":"Value of stochastic reserve policies in low-carbon power systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Electric Power System Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pratt and Whitney Canada","keywords":"Reserve requirement; Wind power; Electric power system; Wind generator; Reliability engineering; Environmental economics; Computer science; Power system simulation; Electricity generation; Scheduling (production processes); Environmental science; Business; Power (physics); Operations management; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.00741985161677194,"score_gpt":0.19234960535860088,"score_spread":0.18492975374182893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016141565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6415131,0.0026253676,0.32044137,0.0035742202,0.00026249432,0.00011654637,0.00046447653,0.0006397666,0.030362781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971353,0.00017526104,0.0020346872,0.000029206522,0.000014508152,0.0000100480665,0.000025199697,0.000016020345,0.0005598665],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905974,0.00053467415,0.000035758098,0.000078665915,0.00017025527,0.00012092288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993233,0.0052959085,0.0006109966,0.00019198726,0.0004426564,0.00022543901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027217928,0.0007452836,0.0010805421,0.0005262443,0.0006862332,0.0018811407,0.00084655435,0.0010355636,0.0023589379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010552003,0.00051836006,0.00041443505,0.0005106922,0.0012493933,0.0015927084,0.00076818094,0.0009948167,0.00013195073],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006937467,0.000010814066,0.00022111424,0.000019215347,0.0000131582265,0.000054148357,0.00000831683,0.98703194,0.00017017563,0.010574022,0.00018194798,0.0016457748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015590005,0.000038625614,0.00016213584,0.0000062421514,0.0000088035495,0.000014670057,0.0000132689875,0.9878169,0.00011667086,0.011663583,0.00013715144,0.000006318901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004180914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002923205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004180914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001795879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013889114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014394343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021957535","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr51","title":"Interactive enhanced particle swarm optimization: A multi-objective reliability application","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Particle swarm optimization; Mathematical optimization; Multi-swarm optimization; Maximization; Reliability (semiconductor); Metaheuristic; Computer science; Position (finance); Convergence (economics); Process (computing); Minification; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0195059979262874,"score_gpt":0.2871447188501895,"score_spread":0.2676387209239021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021957535","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010893401,0.00026317444,0.9856205,0.000106892105,0.00003355032,0.000049546394,0.000015567022,0.00028489504,0.0027325742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45988113,0.0005693037,0.53601724,0.00010341562,0.00008297317,0.00020997219,0.00006815567,0.0000988498,0.0029689933],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960715,0.00015389387,0.000019768118,0.000046282203,0.00014782493,0.000025042013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994122,0.00035082895,0.00006346266,0.000044435637,0.00011309549,0.000016035565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009952039,0.0008278768,0.00070139795,0.0005172722,0.0002701323,0.0005382572,0.00087653735,0.0010754245,0.0015174868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019523686,0.0003410825,0.00063510594,0.00050394837,0.00037238997,0.0006268337,0.000671867,0.00071440137,0.0002642653],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010115094,0.00007742535,0.00084719784,0.00016302429,0.000090324174,0.00014425807,0.0001216472,0.8733873,0.005606104,0.009103381,0.0008594714,0.1094988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010329401,0.000030499035,0.00012467428,0.0000055156374,0.0000077516,0.000022952869,0.000003386323,0.99701023,0.00084176054,0.0010680761,0.000871353,0.0000035567575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015422285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013070817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015422285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033301645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039984877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0052632093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029500005","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr11","title":"Failure Bunching Phenomena in Electric Power Transmission Systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Electric power transmission; Reliability (semiconductor); Overhead (engineering); Reliability engineering; Tower; Power transmission; Failure mode and effects analysis; Electric power system; Transmission line; Transmission (telecommunications); Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Transmission system; Power (physics); Electric power; Electrical engineering; Engineering; Telecommunications; Structural engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.002822704829870875,"score_gpt":0.16985058816909218,"score_spread":0.1670278833392213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029500005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033707,0.003187286,0.27817202,0.00027630696,0.0000737892,0.00006709388,0.00010612731,0.0005333018,0.014213375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506134,0.00055128185,0.0030999328,0.000017277593,0.00001943628,0.0000109516395,0.00001996517,0.000019229636,0.0012005407],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999824,0.000039135964,0.0000099779345,0.000029948123,0.00006938627,0.00002757743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999424,0.00027209523,0.00014676897,0.00006159756,0.000069747075,0.00002592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035099665,0.00035535966,0.0004039035,0.00054564787,0.00030168702,0.00042843318,0.00046760408,0.00042078074,0.0010275587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001637366,0.00024378145,0.00024529698,0.0006144089,0.0007550576,0.00097441045,0.00041803226,0.0005907729,0.00010675525],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010010982,0.00004351092,0.004844119,0.0001196607,0.000022368517,0.0012807398,0.00043749093,0.922797,0.01504833,0.019611442,0.00081635674,0.034878887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001068072,0.00024708154,0.010881106,0.000035250225,0.000014351975,0.00085681706,0.00018104976,0.9538244,0.0037317453,0.02842033,0.0017577123,0.000039504328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038831707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025932344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038831707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048220163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017666158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077211857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065694111","doi":"10.1177/1748006x11422623","title":"Reliability analysis of generalized multi-state <i>k</i> -out-of- <i>n</i> systems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); State (computer science); Component (thermodynamics); Integer (computer science); Computer science; Flexibility (engineering); Independent and identically distributed random variables; Algorithm; Reliability theory; Mathematics; Random variable; Statistics; Physics; Failure rate","score_opus":0.014941330809820356,"score_gpt":0.21171552099841387,"score_spread":0.19677419018859352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065694111","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22310218,0.00049439206,0.77293915,0.00021291948,0.000029917508,0.000036810994,0.00011054874,0.00019665557,0.0028774436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602575,0.00016270725,0.012968851,0.000021255288,0.000016286054,0.00002537153,0.000057222533,0.000021561345,0.00070098176],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955195,0.00015037466,0.000017990293,0.000090219335,0.000107611406,0.00008181828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00052612904,0.0001988995,0.00011706602,0.00014562864,0.00003981414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009353453,0.00047946718,0.0006949102,0.0004390627,0.00028634473,0.0005113222,0.0007939769,0.00039828164,0.0008989427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023854293,0.00029219346,0.00074236,0.00036895843,0.00085408223,0.0009123586,0.0006230361,0.000489919,0.00009764172],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024682051,0.000005391238,0.0005369406,0.000020171432,0.000014768913,0.00005804502,0.000030238745,0.9876957,0.00088130747,0.0077683125,0.00013523662,0.0028292434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016318658,0.000007835765,0.00031538756,0.0000018783842,0.0000031944744,0.0000138831,0.000006694829,0.9948521,0.00011222647,0.0046163676,0.00006572435,0.0000031497211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060217576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003047293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060217576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000712664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000580892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011973441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081075072","doi":"10.1177/1748006x15573166","title":"A multi-constrained maintenance scheduling optimization model for a hydrocarbon processing facility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scheduling (production processes); Reliability engineering; Preventive maintenance; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Flexibility (engineering); Predictive maintenance; Optimal maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Operations research; Operations management","score_opus":0.016711110142128848,"score_gpt":0.22234054406329892,"score_spread":0.20562943392117009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081075072","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06403396,0.0008433196,0.91755056,0.00064799434,0.000089656634,0.00015631922,0.0007714787,0.00034660797,0.0155601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145668,0.00088611775,0.065708354,0.00010687361,0.00005838536,0.00052489096,0.00055753364,0.000088726316,0.0175023],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995129,0.00014232342,0.000021603571,0.00011458606,0.00011313559,0.000095469266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.00018480323,0.00009314814,0.000015201825,0.000078517405,0.00003429432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006957133,0.0010604257,0.0011762399,0.0006614642,0.0005055156,0.0013287744,0.0017368583,0.0019480287,0.0036602863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096838456,0.00069952285,0.0008169323,0.0010477738,0.000561759,0.00083738274,0.000744738,0.001229974,0.00040925032],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017849388,0.000015730053,0.000096243915,0.000029357103,0.000008566713,0.000049149832,0.000013431653,0.9952649,0.0004379618,0.0022827778,0.0002008039,0.0015833097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070760293,0.000016952314,0.00008323502,0.000002595981,0.000006432324,0.000008401927,0.000005468797,0.99908817,0.0000757253,0.00048261278,0.00022011201,0.000003191202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017550817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009686925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017550817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014952337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019744197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034897327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090052210","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr218","title":"Reliability assessment of a wind power delivery system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Electric power system; Renewable energy; Reliability engineering; Sizing; Electric power transmission; Transmission line; Transmission (telecommunications); Reliability (semiconductor); Transmission system; Power system simulator for engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Automotive engineering; Power (physics); Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.006361742821705281,"score_gpt":0.19867907956973754,"score_spread":0.19231733674803225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090052210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81935966,0.00062638125,0.17218038,0.00018712447,0.00003344785,0.00016972974,0.00027728805,0.0005169846,0.0066491123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442494,0.00008115344,0.004780872,0.0000067049036,0.000006991339,0.000019346407,0.00005409915,0.000012208668,0.0006137063],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993924,0.00026212898,0.000031361677,0.000049367172,0.00022625457,0.00003848887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984333,0.0008772627,0.00017580342,0.000093944946,0.00037178668,0.000047821628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082317396,0.0006493918,0.00044084806,0.0008904066,0.00030035566,0.0005912399,0.00037591383,0.00054628664,0.0014822347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032177716,0.00026619853,0.00035274852,0.00036589423,0.00027794534,0.00047955706,0.00030384437,0.0003844053,0.0002755945],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005932935,0.000091907095,0.008519052,0.00019013161,0.000102080485,0.00062474806,0.00014304416,0.9284853,0.024191411,0.0021535244,0.0005003944,0.034405205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019623782,0.00042426825,0.002470045,0.000010442329,0.000035985464,0.00010853805,0.000029824121,0.99200386,0.0040011904,0.00064655306,0.00023890434,0.000010704794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002141445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015148469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002141445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000459272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003164695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049586296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106129728","doi":"10.1177/1748006x11421265","title":"A condition- and age-based replacement model using delay time modelling","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Computer science; Condition-based maintenance; Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Operations research; Order (exchange); Preventive maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm; Economics","score_opus":0.015353892874597546,"score_gpt":0.20182504819341937,"score_spread":0.18647115531882183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106129728","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07496504,0.0010302186,0.90746367,0.0008374001,0.00019171488,0.000171124,0.001774565,0.0005413777,0.01302485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124756,0.0014443904,0.041130587,0.00011767401,0.00010657637,0.0004838129,0.00094053283,0.00009581419,0.043205008],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993197,0.00013928971,0.00004911433,0.00021767027,0.00014022802,0.00013409586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865097,0.0006885753,0.0002561439,0.000060478298,0.00024214816,0.00010161907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015275045,0.0011941742,0.0016091242,0.001181058,0.0005135207,0.0020666646,0.003554356,0.003322365,0.0068024457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032138298,0.0009654325,0.0014263069,0.0014487416,0.00086794834,0.0019313011,0.0010520879,0.0016510535,0.0010857184],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034597182,0.000019865009,0.00038690015,0.000029210618,0.000016673894,0.000069032394,0.000031946944,0.9898031,0.0005304937,0.0068865577,0.00018887072,0.0020027307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008446077,0.00001605216,0.00013304784,0.0000030495933,0.0000121944995,0.000016094498,0.000004335756,0.9979937,0.000065697466,0.0014868437,0.0002536686,0.000006868695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01783308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008762029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01783308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015990416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014800007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035458565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116650366","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr149","title":"Managing and predicting technological risk and human reliability: A new learning curve theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Econometrics; Computer science; Failure rate; Statistics; Human reliability; Human error; Measure (data warehouse); Entropy (arrow of time); Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.036556692771992444,"score_gpt":0.29366876572865114,"score_spread":0.2571120729566587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116650366","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041644655,0.002419823,0.9405143,0.0047546825,0.00011586364,0.000115867406,0.00019042353,0.0002553405,0.009988986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8571534,0.004926113,0.13055038,0.0006962804,0.0006603898,0.00037040765,0.00025536382,0.00013900636,0.00524873],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666035,0.0014617424,0.00013781153,0.0005487924,0.0008864492,0.00030491428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659448,0.026870707,0.0025026698,0.0016083654,0.0024189323,0.0006544194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067029297,0.0015434104,0.0017090946,0.0027487618,0.0011026706,0.0040202606,0.002888331,0.0035782736,0.0026960801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051966496,0.00066046574,0.0013720205,0.0024224124,0.0053356765,0.00997194,0.0031829886,0.0034858652,0.00051464303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111893736,0.00019055407,0.018459884,0.000267729,0.00017583909,0.00022139405,0.00094682927,0.55389,0.00054440706,0.33118153,0.0027041074,0.09130585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012222013,0.00009510733,0.0021796024,0.00007148853,0.000028055712,0.000097870565,0.00014743766,0.57731974,0.00020930926,0.41781017,0.0019661821,0.00006284802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005900708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019605528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067029297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002791609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020707056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03544891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122527029","doi":"10.1177/1748006x13512631","title":"Accountability, Risk, and the ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) limit of benefit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Risk management; Business; Probabilistic logic; Quality (philosophy); Index (typography); Limit (mathematics); Environmental economics; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.007798496294093507,"score_gpt":0.2524914793537018,"score_spread":0.2446929830596083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122527029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051290713,0.010115148,0.2106982,0.22844282,0.0015422909,0.00032345165,0.0002225318,0.00025913963,0.4971057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93524534,0.0017609207,0.032296095,0.014085277,0.001044694,0.0006063172,0.000050339604,0.00006810941,0.014843035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9218944,0.039829858,0.0046611186,0.0049951235,0.025053997,0.0035656227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90747005,0.06220893,0.0105199,0.008317206,0.009007532,0.0024764785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05405182,0.00080631446,0.0011133283,0.0020837837,0.0044214753,0.017820608,0.0018673597,0.012378059,0.0030824917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0972692,0.0006290858,0.0008958981,0.0011208807,0.039524186,0.012848781,0.00847661,0.009205533,0.0009220748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019752973,0.000020517877,0.0006963863,0.00007344028,0.000011227856,0.00005075918,0.0008435763,0.00064456917,0.00022209343,0.9868166,0.002197134,0.008404125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001818614,0.00009447941,0.0010455169,0.00033701892,0.000018246557,0.0002035608,0.00093784,0.0013613633,0.00029779502,0.9640573,0.031573147,0.000055589746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032997113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024253537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05405182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062527508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010707124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28585672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124602339","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr249","title":"Effect of hourly wind trends on the peak load-carrying capability of wind-integrated power systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wind power; Wind speed; Turbine; Power (physics); Automotive engineering; Environmental science; Marine engineering; Electric power system; Engineering; Meteorology; Electrical engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.004627208618187897,"score_gpt":0.19896290525922514,"score_spread":0.19433569664103723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124602339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99843043,0.00004182465,0.00082634157,0.00002690041,0.0000058087458,0.000005952965,0.00012925145,0.000020382091,0.000513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996754,0.000020183876,0.00014315044,0.0000043611617,0.0000028899565,0.000001692375,0.00008558931,0.0000037750126,0.00006308746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996996,0.00010580198,0.000025664072,0.00003451602,0.000083309154,0.000051197054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397177,0.004213435,0.0008262028,0.0003202209,0.00047315474,0.00019522956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015151196,0.0002972103,0.0002792216,0.000380049,0.0002563408,0.0006126343,0.00022271388,0.0003831641,0.0006513179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005567636,0.00023256218,0.0002786918,0.00045155807,0.00026561823,0.000622299,0.00022397259,0.00044298236,0.00009925357],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023494717,0.00030995518,0.32482272,0.00015702928,0.00029166095,0.0018847531,0.00027405113,0.6196345,0.01767461,0.0011719518,0.00078644394,0.030642886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306688,0.0012252912,0.6519254,0.000026782298,0.00012670955,0.0005507252,0.00037672475,0.3367899,0.0078605255,0.0006183643,0.00041782466,0.00005119929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024129774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030474437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024129774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031586905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014322926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008012831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126085726","doi":"10.1177/1748006x12472158","title":"Accident modeling and risk assessment framework for safety critical decision-making: application to deepwater drilling operation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Hazard; Hazard analysis; Work (physics); Offshore drilling; Deepwater drilling; Risk management; Identification (biology); System safety; Engineering; Submarine pipeline; Computer science; Drilling; Reliability engineering; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.018139141104378954,"score_gpt":0.3364573579814555,"score_spread":0.3183182168770765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126085726","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023698792,0.0004986225,0.9716361,0.00055820623,0.000045619465,0.00013612951,0.000102897844,0.00028130907,0.0030423335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66293365,0.00093549665,0.33205387,0.00011504066,0.0001166945,0.0004075066,0.00017433555,0.000056717556,0.0032067066],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.0007591645,0.00008262249,0.00013388923,0.00031056965,0.00012666373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970266,0.0019804966,0.00024853775,0.000062685634,0.00053688453,0.00014478606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035779828,0.0012060421,0.0010838056,0.0010878796,0.0008620421,0.0016996105,0.0014877667,0.0014293452,0.002502463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044191945,0.00049349916,0.0012429736,0.0008141723,0.0006797137,0.00095876347,0.00145034,0.0017992775,0.00024197155],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041083065,0.000082187566,0.00069192535,0.00006666284,0.000058372432,0.00009192982,0.00014474553,0.9645693,0.00048290056,0.018696034,0.0003266229,0.014748291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060557054,0.000021649203,0.000078165234,0.000009047601,0.000012061967,0.000012493372,0.000024220953,0.99494463,0.00010323265,0.0044024554,0.00037865347,0.000007356847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024500223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015887951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024500223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020149508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035072062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048715234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126242518","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr219","title":"Modelling N- and W-shaped hazard rate functions without mixing distributions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; Western University","funders":"Massey University","keywords":"Bathtub; Weibull distribution; Mathematics; Parametric statistics; Hazard; Applied mathematics; Polynomial; Maxima and minima; Function (biology); Maxima; Degree (music); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Physics; Materials science","score_opus":0.03463820527458046,"score_gpt":0.2737841420234362,"score_spread":0.23914593674885576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126242518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032500554,0.00013278193,0.96595865,0.00006891113,0.000016961418,0.000052601456,0.00006282639,0.00019606686,0.0010105832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8319691,0.00058356096,0.1594487,0.00008799402,0.000053088064,0.00026218852,0.0003035035,0.00011484751,0.00717707],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982432,0.0007810981,0.00009509744,0.00040916953,0.0002688617,0.00020264945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123466,0.005868937,0.0013274756,0.00097411184,0.0004659031,0.00012889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070081013,0.0014622275,0.0011158235,0.0011659253,0.00033953445,0.001266164,0.0026469347,0.0019740157,0.0019650757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01693675,0.00062944985,0.0021898202,0.0012822328,0.0012614261,0.0023344883,0.0013655586,0.001645636,0.00088601216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026211224,0.00008343207,0.003894166,0.00011776808,0.00008812368,0.00023103524,0.00024269894,0.89957124,0.003404483,0.05161919,0.00046560398,0.040020097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008948667,0.000058612983,0.00059460883,0.000013507599,0.00001911902,0.00009040125,0.000024854635,0.9829291,0.0011230566,0.014631946,0.0004808935,0.00002490263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001384496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070081013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008020102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007529265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037062824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133020076","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr93","title":"Maintenance modelling and scheduling in fault-tolerant control","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fault tolerance; Scheduling (production processes); Markov chain; Computer science; Optimal maintenance; Fault detection and isolation; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Control (management); Distributed computing; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Actuator; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.007165396534082781,"score_gpt":0.1837241743250642,"score_spread":0.17655877779098142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133020076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023567908,0.00048219107,0.97421366,0.00020806442,0.000034202672,0.000015570491,0.000035237706,0.00007593509,0.0013673453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462266,0.0008794867,0.0500235,0.000046346726,0.000080016456,0.000093090996,0.00009812997,0.00003508214,0.0025177323],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994717,0.00017994038,0.000026858244,0.000095106836,0.00016495008,0.000061566265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907047,0.0005850978,0.00017659165,0.00004663216,0.00008896912,0.000032258642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008828646,0.00064884487,0.00071837136,0.0003745799,0.00030969622,0.00089998776,0.00096398214,0.00085452385,0.00077915034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026438083,0.00037253185,0.00055140915,0.00049694575,0.00070616225,0.00096460595,0.00037437922,0.00066690444,0.00014022396],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109550965,0.00000723828,0.00012477017,0.000016974867,0.0000072891257,0.000018118244,0.000018196723,0.9810207,0.00038923472,0.014810072,0.00009632429,0.0034801813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019669303,0.000005902229,0.0000364274,0.000001791293,0.000001818669,0.000004196062,0.0000024720741,0.9947949,0.00009675834,0.0049010525,0.0001508807,0.0000018397789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008552276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040009925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008552276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011370752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010945518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017005026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150605328","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr210","title":"Physical programming and conjoint analysis-based redundancy allocation in multistate systems: A Taguchi embedded algorithm selection and control (TAS&amp;C) approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Particle swarm optimization; Taguchi methods; Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024271052201691665,"score_gpt":0.3266420823009661,"score_spread":0.3023710300992744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150605328","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00973813,0.00014203852,0.9886929,0.00006042276,0.0000143039615,0.00004225206,0.0000035826981,0.000088161265,0.0012183584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6053474,0.00036538148,0.39133433,0.00009198579,0.000027975535,0.00023495535,0.000018654857,0.00003848243,0.0025408908],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989429,0.0004633986,0.000041879888,0.00012632096,0.00037327423,0.00005218905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.00042424045,0.00014104102,0.00004829517,0.00013423976,0.000020478405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001509083,0.00077454204,0.00078350597,0.0006565981,0.00043112904,0.0012489794,0.00097560417,0.0008203224,0.0008246448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016973619,0.000493557,0.0008023275,0.00071311544,0.0009149104,0.0007146486,0.0006318553,0.0008788929,0.00014902536],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053806438,0.000067406254,0.00036795597,0.00007821648,0.000043604417,0.000042063006,0.00006175107,0.93097407,0.005984437,0.006134521,0.00015851932,0.056033682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002969392,0.000064048065,0.00007837222,0.000003553219,0.0000074784543,0.000012210703,0.000005023071,0.99797505,0.00089867733,0.00074752275,0.0001996619,0.000005536931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031089229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026573567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031089229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076199503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010735195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007980883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158310369","doi":"10.1177/1748006x12466371","title":"Quantitative modeling of organizational resilience for Dutch emergency response safety regions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Emergency response; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Emergency management; Risk analysis (engineering); Quality (philosophy); Process management; Computer science; Business; Geography; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03982071146247176,"score_gpt":0.3218974619265687,"score_spread":0.28207675046409697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158310369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8567357,0.00030579368,0.12376283,0.0006911452,0.000023592132,0.00008571171,0.0010556919,0.00010326351,0.017236227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920061,0.00010428633,0.005405332,0.0000145038,0.000004686554,0.00007872959,0.00017149269,0.000020474088,0.0021944023],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994741,0.00023678617,0.000019867653,0.0000922066,0.00005122096,0.00012579169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981352,0.0011752911,0.00030283834,0.00007724974,0.00019500068,0.00011437782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012981484,0.0004170515,0.00033480866,0.000817074,0.00035441067,0.0013102588,0.0009186789,0.0008468194,0.0027506144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778881,0.0003102024,0.0006673211,0.00072437903,0.0008258684,0.0010800122,0.0007739877,0.00047968826,0.00017317552],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015975726,0.000013045003,0.0020162053,0.000015817333,0.00000969365,0.000047117606,0.00009174897,0.9881246,0.00031103048,0.008191586,0.000106985484,0.0010561516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036867862,0.000011187111,0.0013563861,0.0000053080707,0.0000046623395,0.000007687279,0.00011208337,0.99563426,0.00007832594,0.0024738486,0.0003068694,0.0000057391303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08131559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031696264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08131559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003797936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014013154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16168451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170832271","doi":"10.1243/1748006xjrr264","title":"Generic approach for deriving reliability and maintenance requirements through consideration of in-context customer objectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Maintainability; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Failure rate; Implementation; Risk analysis (engineering); Preventive maintenance; Product (mathematics); Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.020893477840359654,"score_gpt":0.2379309116932677,"score_spread":0.21703743385290802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170832271","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006728773,0.000051846215,0.9858503,0.00012450849,0.000012511798,0.00014335418,0.00012118209,0.00017055108,0.0067969416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1397071,0.00031108267,0.85657144,0.00015683759,0.000024214816,0.00041492187,0.000297785,0.00013460677,0.0023820256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726045,0.0008601542,0.0002261542,0.0002757426,0.0012289418,0.00014858355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779725,0.0005554009,0.000285804,0.0005344894,0.0007635433,0.00006355117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034930548,0.0017927114,0.00082291075,0.0017286646,0.000728303,0.002708346,0.0017068377,0.0016318953,0.0026791734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056974622,0.0007771675,0.0016220872,0.0012506506,0.00087586994,0.002243453,0.0018282623,0.0021374668,0.000857774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008915245,0.00048243598,0.00781931,0.0010719266,0.00027229986,0.0013829373,0.0015967105,0.31097588,0.05094513,0.43518737,0.0041190605,0.1860578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044879333,0.00054382044,0.0063592996,0.00038202983,0.0004044563,0.0013697498,0.0007038147,0.67488134,0.05231259,0.21361722,0.049158935,0.00022190718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015102826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023609172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034930548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014109006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026733035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018473268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320828504","doi":"10.1177/1748006x13477008","title":"An efficient method for the estimation of parameters of stochastic gamma process from noisy degradation measurements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Gamma process; Sizing; Degradation (telecommunications); Computer science; Process (computing); Particle filter; Stochastic process; Noise (video); Algorithm; Filter (signal processing); Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012497191141599952,"score_gpt":0.24197677737994883,"score_spread":0.22947958623834888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320828504","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043291567,0.000040262225,0.9993082,0.000010760235,0.0000059516565,0.000009989502,0.0000097314705,0.000097889424,0.00008416028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032365948,0.00027162395,0.96593815,0.000030008692,0.000030974592,0.0001528013,0.00015852405,0.00010880776,0.00094316754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991535,0.00033942566,0.000038244576,0.00011304056,0.00032563586,0.000030189041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986539,0.00084950466,0.00012452959,0.00012590848,0.00022429116,0.000021867349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015545284,0.0010924006,0.0009246582,0.0013074907,0.0003539783,0.0006207316,0.0010395943,0.0010652513,0.0020535667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005074899,0.0005714369,0.00074693776,0.0010811244,0.00064994226,0.0011167715,0.0010788537,0.0014829985,0.0011076023],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016954895,0.000093714574,0.0014601023,0.00042291865,0.00013183597,0.0003063155,0.00022454036,0.36925155,0.037926536,0.0506402,0.00308819,0.53628457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001873888,0.000035844958,0.00055480254,0.000022478676,0.000019515588,0.00031886683,0.000013009561,0.9799856,0.005992191,0.0096484,0.0033507317,0.000039814266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00171606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024550776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020535667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048506196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013098582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008221269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321994534","doi":"10.1177/1748007810393826","title":"Finite-time maintenance cost analysis of engineering systems affected by stochastic degradation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University Network of Excellence in Nuclear Engineering","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Time horizon; Gamma process; Optimal maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Preventive maintenance; Minification; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Process (computing); Stochastic process; Variance (accounting); Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.006534947984490498,"score_gpt":0.17911523458889653,"score_spread":0.17258028660440602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321994534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48485327,0.0016357771,0.50570995,0.0006867773,0.0000500728,0.000059418417,0.00017207331,0.00015829505,0.006674403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944877,0.00020589012,0.004096233,0.000019342058,0.000015009246,0.000027886716,0.000048307505,0.000023807273,0.0010756933],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993048,0.00026724496,0.000029720573,0.000073549374,0.00019813723,0.00012660651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948755,0.0039091236,0.0005509983,0.00012975521,0.00038174857,0.00015280505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025106024,0.0007307028,0.0009158694,0.0008767195,0.0002791529,0.0010158205,0.0011576749,0.00087320997,0.0010914494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007774328,0.00049971556,0.000707437,0.0005332047,0.00093681156,0.00094035594,0.00055674143,0.00084565626,0.00008405742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022639202,0.000009810007,0.00033032979,0.000015608457,0.000013426785,0.000038361137,0.000010563386,0.9950465,0.00034152615,0.003185632,0.000054463337,0.0009312596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016325303,0.000007980935,0.00027084685,0.0000017407054,0.0000046568143,0.0000073601905,0.0000043425584,0.9988362,0.000058998583,0.0007851338,0.000018907085,0.000002209955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008469543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003048529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008469543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00181064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008684463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016840518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328128098","doi":"10.1177/1748006x15598914","title":"Selective maintenance scheduling over a finite planning horizon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Shutdown; Scheduling (production processes); Time horizon; Optimal maintenance; Reliability engineering; Planned maintenance; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009654871328553168,"score_gpt":0.21535605835251495,"score_spread":0.20570118702396178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328128098","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08914686,0.000646498,0.9001115,0.00031822475,0.000063320054,0.00015354194,0.0005703407,0.00041210317,0.008577696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93265057,0.0005683699,0.061225016,0.000039895673,0.000032162385,0.00021854408,0.00033518177,0.000029324094,0.004901069],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996227,0.000080309976,0.000019915038,0.00010181753,0.00009894352,0.000076338794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947447,0.00021937421,0.00012370446,0.000048830854,0.00007681988,0.000056884386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005710843,0.00081781705,0.0008254022,0.00045425876,0.0004378051,0.0007571089,0.0018527559,0.00073193916,0.0033486534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010508592,0.00049307407,0.0005914893,0.0006717226,0.00050368375,0.00087127934,0.00043770543,0.00072567654,0.00029716583],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045353736,0.00003159074,0.0002906887,0.00005674989,0.000019208854,0.0000937889,0.00002293688,0.9808328,0.0010184564,0.007757042,0.0003578275,0.009473518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014761788,0.000042851087,0.0001703633,0.0000041369176,0.000015382246,0.000024505296,0.000006622361,0.99623233,0.00025987485,0.002705705,0.0005189422,0.0000044869903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080484925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005844669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080484925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010121838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016915769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01600331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336675174","doi":"10.1177/1748006x16631202","title":"Reliability estimation considering usage rate profile and warranty claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Failure rate; Computer science; Population; Field (mathematics); Estimation; Task (project management); Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.006109775821410678,"score_gpt":0.1960387168812009,"score_spread":0.18992894105979022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336675174","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36234596,0.0004050281,0.63449097,0.00018542705,0.000015694268,0.000072499904,0.00056470605,0.0005858064,0.0013338481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96871614,0.00017788753,0.029653255,0.000018505943,0.000020997877,0.000043159365,0.00066943915,0.000027040036,0.00067352416],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990459,0.000313983,0.00008030223,0.00021342933,0.00026165028,0.000084729385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534744,0.00266463,0.0006918765,0.000560156,0.00064029195,0.00009570463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015122995,0.00076584605,0.0007111426,0.0011569341,0.0001739439,0.00071895996,0.0009033861,0.0010043096,0.00051162473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091291955,0.00037471988,0.000776714,0.0010353713,0.00021677998,0.0012422765,0.00042588782,0.0008038285,0.00024970016],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009405371,0.000052886648,0.01401695,0.0000575416,0.000051319512,0.00023124843,0.00009061392,0.94404733,0.003771472,0.0013259873,0.00037457855,0.035886034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014084607,0.000020014397,0.002302904,0.0000037340485,0.000004926092,0.000045425604,0.000010974141,0.9963207,0.00056752824,0.0006310995,0.000085826454,0.0000053682375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042106467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026505764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042106467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043710333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039813356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008372307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338995105","doi":"10.1177/1748006x15595875","title":"System availability enhancement using computational intelligence–based decision tree predictive model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Decision tree; Fault tree analysis; Process (computing); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Tree (set theory); Fault detection and isolation; Fault (geology); Decision tree model; Data mining; Decision model; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.01575260835563995,"score_gpt":0.232243033206015,"score_spread":0.21649042485037506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338995105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0806708,0.00038534414,0.91301566,0.000300177,0.000057035693,0.000082718034,0.00011036789,0.00076522946,0.0046126936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96775347,0.00017912984,0.030603908,0.000046204008,0.00001928665,0.000090164795,0.00008754603,0.00001783909,0.0012025257],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960893,0.00011439856,0.00002426507,0.00007486024,0.00012278922,0.000054745316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990695,0.00062510563,0.00008391052,0.00002937177,0.00017008962,0.000022052085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076662115,0.0006213473,0.0008190149,0.00054350414,0.00031139475,0.00079042086,0.0007355451,0.0006595973,0.0013865505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020538336,0.00030385508,0.0005727941,0.00054890546,0.00029052485,0.00075927394,0.00037797485,0.00094460655,0.00017380828],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000262978,0.000027815058,0.0003083961,0.00002127302,0.000012215019,0.000026687409,0.000015117521,0.98742735,0.0004094505,0.0009279909,0.00016804073,0.010629301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.348524e-7,0.0000052642076,0.000029653092,8.0008084e-7,0.0000017565163,0.00000149816,7.037348e-7,0.999718,0.00006084408,0.0001577489,0.00002201379,7.599687e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01140908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070264786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01140908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067640736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008982465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022685349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344953494","doi":"10.1177/1748006x16641767","title":"Higher moments and probability distribution of maintenance cost in the delay time model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Kurtosis; Skewness; Variance (accounting); Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Random variable; Probability distribution; Reliability engineering; Time horizon; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.006951164490658533,"score_gpt":0.19376873005203366,"score_spread":0.18681756556137513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344953494","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18290654,0.0011533521,0.81016666,0.0007897814,0.00006969408,0.000035636836,0.00028173107,0.00022829458,0.0043684077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740657,0.000875077,0.01941759,0.00005634771,0.00013953456,0.00005177576,0.00018482594,0.000073015806,0.005136167],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990595,0.00019984663,0.000044974735,0.0001825602,0.00030613254,0.00020695818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922002,0.0050927266,0.0012572745,0.00048546502,0.0006859293,0.0002784661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025340517,0.0007246272,0.0009627981,0.0016107898,0.0003110055,0.0019040321,0.0013513223,0.0012011377,0.0024640101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012261737,0.00051334716,0.0007018158,0.0011511687,0.0014221267,0.0031327966,0.0008258283,0.0017517054,0.00031967502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010550874,0.000061846535,0.0026201636,0.000098495795,0.000039928418,0.00035312132,0.00014007608,0.63011414,0.0041270973,0.3528067,0.0008887184,0.008644162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007214954,0.000024537687,0.00092598645,0.000011966836,0.00001221292,0.00009702946,0.00002051906,0.9472044,0.00048189916,0.05085204,0.0003329269,0.000029254328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031477232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013785523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031477232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018430945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085131166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013401508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594988625","doi":"10.1177/1748006x17694494","title":"Formal reliability analysis of oil and gas pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Software Reliability and Analysis Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Monte Carlo method; Pipeline (software); Reliability engineering; Environmental science; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012012727037487446,"score_gpt":0.2573335610753184,"score_spread":0.24532083403783095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594988625","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019951595,0.0003301604,0.9740287,0.00018534827,0.00002793309,0.00006343506,0.00015792502,0.00031909946,0.0049358117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77273583,0.001031743,0.22122766,0.000113945964,0.00012247467,0.00025858817,0.00041271528,0.00011458892,0.003982455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.00053985906,0.00011704725,0.0002280468,0.00070371566,0.00017972123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996603,0.0021409635,0.00036176495,0.000229021,0.000609076,0.00005607447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019249868,0.000641716,0.00032363358,0.001160906,0.00039932193,0.0012832633,0.0009525429,0.0004442419,0.0016486478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051615764,0.0002936591,0.0011393771,0.0005569766,0.0018189818,0.0012528821,0.00074924756,0.00087456894,0.0002395548],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037614413,0.00005926309,0.0009454495,0.0002759989,0.000036013025,0.00041888922,0.0003735362,0.37874073,0.0082810065,0.59024966,0.0006701451,0.01991174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024589708,0.00006792065,0.00047795873,0.00008357809,0.000045140605,0.00017971822,0.00007708516,0.6671567,0.0068469364,0.31529668,0.00971592,0.000027764292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044449326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021814103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044449326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015306532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016036113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011105657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621329470","doi":"10.1177/1748006x17710816","title":"Optimizing the re-profiling policy regarding metropolitan train wheels based on a semi-Markov decision process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Central University Basic Research Fund of China; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Flange; Profiling (computer programming); Markov decision process; Imperfect; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Markov process; Statistics","score_opus":0.008453485537065255,"score_gpt":0.2434860538262645,"score_spread":0.23503256828919925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621329470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23080994,0.0004099933,0.7623557,0.001080273,0.000064986714,0.00014193983,0.00024282128,0.00046439463,0.00443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981079,0.00010982815,0.016428215,0.00006598395,0.000015937447,0.00008625354,0.00009552005,0.000024340623,0.0020949948],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.0002931211,0.000031302407,0.0001820881,0.00011599495,0.0002236853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966304,0.0024652758,0.00034625252,0.00007724826,0.00027510285,0.00020567773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019370348,0.0010513343,0.002258766,0.0006428702,0.0006176482,0.0013894705,0.0013903003,0.0017279744,0.0030951854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033441081,0.0008983707,0.0010697978,0.0004943789,0.0012735297,0.0010401505,0.0010890528,0.0016022957,0.00023844802],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047521677,0.000015643256,0.00029859127,0.000011739835,0.000009987214,0.000030443904,0.000013773682,0.99686843,0.00021141995,0.0013049276,0.0000906287,0.0010968515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067583383,0.000009849561,0.00006482485,0.0000016066366,0.0000044098088,0.0000027937126,0.0000037826262,0.9993272,0.000059398135,0.0004935562,0.000023556031,0.0000023496807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027514579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015689468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027514579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002219149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029582165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05470884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886737844","doi":"10.1177/1748006x18765521","title":"Condition-based selective maintenance for stochastically degrading multi-component systems under periodic inspection and imperfect maintenance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Component (thermodynamics); Reliability engineering; Maintenance actions; Reliability (semiconductor); Imperfect; Optimal maintenance; Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Condition-based maintenance; Mathematical optimization; Predictive maintenance; Engineering; Mathematics; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.00722911458293761,"score_gpt":0.2149677174833689,"score_spread":0.20773860290043128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886737844","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09784372,0.0005005381,0.8979112,0.00024573063,0.0000316677,0.0000678736,0.00012072486,0.00025797726,0.0030205199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041725,0.00020908563,0.01694815,0.000024757828,0.000018760975,0.000072498406,0.000077365454,0.00002618686,0.0022058808],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993186,0.000150375,0.00002610617,0.00016918694,0.00022323862,0.00011248376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907684,0.00048238505,0.00021651029,0.000061555605,0.0001143658,0.000048288235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009463888,0.0010168174,0.0011735081,0.0005067854,0.00035327167,0.00087564037,0.0014826371,0.0011937,0.0013395917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019809494,0.00049751834,0.0008017153,0.00046867193,0.00087990507,0.0011177209,0.0008066565,0.00076751143,0.00015495859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032236327,0.000014446458,0.00021238292,0.000021214557,0.0000083872355,0.00004506838,0.000016312446,0.9941695,0.00090663164,0.0020197418,0.00008741308,0.0024667212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036438316,0.000016393204,0.000117476084,0.0000010304674,0.0000036644901,0.000009331003,0.0000024807052,0.9991722,0.00009038585,0.0005365447,0.0000450619,0.0000017418441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008350987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046757627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008350987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012640463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090187247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016604781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913411440","doi":"10.1177/1748006x18764511","title":"Toward a hybrid model of ship performance in ice suitable for route planning purpose","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; European Commission","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Sea ice; Identification (biology); Computer science; Meteorology; Marine engineering; Operations research; Lead (geology); Environmental science; Engineering; Geology; Geography","score_opus":0.0181722524201151,"score_gpt":0.21835098555511626,"score_spread":0.20017873313500115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913411440","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14919116,0.00072205346,0.8280245,0.0008969551,0.00012728032,0.000095680676,0.0018871375,0.00072707876,0.018328117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95730466,0.0006520425,0.02725335,0.00015021153,0.000093031806,0.00025568856,0.0014701715,0.00016201299,0.0126588065],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968505,0.000057418132,0.00001454166,0.00011207466,0.000060678143,0.00007022723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994165,0.00021479969,0.00010573167,0.00003810361,0.00017329273,0.000051589002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005253049,0.00098208,0.00076343596,0.00072593044,0.00031163293,0.0017160738,0.0018021831,0.0015406236,0.0021225985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015988034,0.0006560598,0.0012823653,0.0008284347,0.0007064969,0.0012531648,0.0010389631,0.0011550225,0.000731565],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073697756,0.000009426932,0.00082788785,0.0000093135695,0.000011550537,0.0000329031,0.000020051362,0.9959757,0.00033158142,0.0014038134,0.00017664403,0.001193803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017889389,0.0000056663994,0.00029361589,0.0000035611245,0.000005982662,0.0000066825237,0.000006924183,0.99853706,0.000049510985,0.0008571448,0.00022786872,0.0000041453536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026773294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010425337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026773294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010227896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010356328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053234935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990993108","doi":"10.1177/1748006x19888421","title":"AK-PDF: An active learning method combining kriging and probability density function for efficient reliability analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Kriging; Probability density function; Function (biology); Monte Carlo method; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.022115700084773,"score_gpt":0.2855558154777289,"score_spread":0.2634401153929559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990993108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007850585,0.00011498148,0.9985128,0.00002659628,0.000016397968,0.0000104638275,0.0000129130585,0.000210175,0.00031060283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2064486,0.0007454392,0.7874584,0.00013751484,0.00013560796,0.00028001255,0.00020821884,0.0002879938,0.004298138],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999201,0.00027671267,0.00004222188,0.0001161202,0.0003185794,0.000045337012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819916,0.0010946152,0.000118820426,0.00011944018,0.00042376123,0.0000442282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021068386,0.0011602488,0.0014591988,0.0015673551,0.0004820029,0.000970711,0.0020262636,0.0014562072,0.0020672774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00362983,0.000669436,0.0011320512,0.0012762339,0.000806532,0.0019571837,0.0011923579,0.001697985,0.00079405215],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066514396,0.000057869674,0.00059054565,0.0001792812,0.000074803975,0.00006866317,0.00006906569,0.78075624,0.0033765465,0.010108645,0.0019962506,0.20265561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031038242,0.000008546133,0.00003667595,0.000005222782,0.0000041990456,0.000014132855,0.0000019105353,0.9973762,0.00042103996,0.0014600515,0.000663531,0.0000053252134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038661319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036003992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038661319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011142194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005968199","doi":"10.1177/1748006x19900850","title":"Analysis of maritime transport accidents using Bayesian networks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Maritime Navigation and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Key Technologies Research and Development Program; Major Technology Innovation of Hubei Province; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Tonnage; Bayesian network; Transport engineering; Accident (philosophy); Interdependence; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.008201900854601206,"score_gpt":0.21117594687591382,"score_spread":0.2029740460213126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005968199","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10372222,0.0005718681,0.89044714,0.0005009407,0.00002809488,0.00016903355,0.00061880663,0.00020457002,0.0037372527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91666913,0.00095108507,0.07838742,0.000078613346,0.000066204375,0.00025501667,0.0010333565,0.000027083222,0.0025320507],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983834,0.00077389117,0.000077244265,0.00030757178,0.00032838157,0.00012957797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963856,0.0026787915,0.00045191616,0.00007799952,0.00033474487,0.00007098537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026120923,0.0010202543,0.000984587,0.0031587025,0.00055387564,0.001420165,0.0012890189,0.0009842545,0.0020256918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008722312,0.00073100376,0.0013502243,0.0015259128,0.0005584533,0.0018703892,0.0008529916,0.0008425372,0.00021436694],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045127275,0.00003732259,0.0042860284,0.00003718368,0.000083784646,0.000081650986,0.00004873432,0.9730821,0.00023052878,0.010395792,0.00031448278,0.0113573475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023936814,0.0000068234845,0.00056464784,0.000005168828,0.000011150739,0.0000106943935,0.00000964418,0.99422646,0.00004297606,0.0050085606,0.00010620488,0.000005221982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025215564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015670922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025215564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017993888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001276302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05013758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111328003","doi":"10.1177/1748006x20978099","title":"A nonlinear Wiener degradation model integrating degradation data under accelerated stresses and real operating environment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Degradation (telecommunications); Acceleration; Precondition; Nonlinear system; Test data; Computer science; Structural engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.0262943912961832,"score_gpt":0.22756266050764667,"score_spread":0.20126826921146349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111328003","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060609125,0.0005026506,0.933811,0.00020028105,0.000057310717,0.00005989912,0.00027833862,0.00053580943,0.003945634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739983,0.00059415906,0.016932396,0.0000548641,0.00003496439,0.00013615783,0.00030481204,0.000039619084,0.007904715],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936134,0.00009776905,0.00004398575,0.00023159606,0.00018427875,0.00008108075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995602,0.00015356456,0.00009706267,0.000035814963,0.0001386056,0.000014768079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087554357,0.001108623,0.00086819567,0.0007276848,0.00033901096,0.0010390957,0.0013969057,0.0014030728,0.0011670903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015510957,0.000439105,0.00087175646,0.00070952164,0.0006510684,0.0016084373,0.00057443045,0.0010393878,0.00039749226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049352413,0.00003113826,0.0015495386,0.00006653296,0.000030807703,0.00014531678,0.000074852265,0.9760064,0.00442603,0.0030603951,0.00029551247,0.014264233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002224832,0.000016024063,0.00033978908,0.000002364309,0.000008994764,0.000026078373,0.0000047090534,0.99845254,0.0003682443,0.00067134487,0.00010124072,0.000006465058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008684409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005222105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008684409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070585107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075448153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017267704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112099311","doi":"10.1177/1748006x20976802","title":"A failure prediction model for corrosion in gas transmission pipelines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Corrosion; Pipeline (software); Natural gas; Forensic engineering; Environmental science; Residual; Failure assessment; Engineering; Petroleum engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Structural engineering; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Materials science","score_opus":0.010916807500700882,"score_gpt":0.2101591347057791,"score_spread":0.19924232720507823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112099311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3737085,0.0013896563,0.61382335,0.0007375636,0.000166307,0.00025402324,0.0017600006,0.0013679018,0.0067928396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797696,0.0004082793,0.013657072,0.00005021277,0.000037109625,0.00027484706,0.0008565511,0.00003866696,0.0049076173],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.00017296175,0.00005428875,0.00025146018,0.0001240127,0.00013674912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986124,0.00070464297,0.00020579217,0.000031297594,0.00040734847,0.00003841268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018226859,0.0014896089,0.0012096121,0.0012519252,0.00047850132,0.0011920859,0.0020077578,0.0018821841,0.0031939643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028943813,0.00064926123,0.0016693335,0.00079537206,0.00055472384,0.0007043952,0.0008291502,0.0019125873,0.000661828],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003333285,0.000032792486,0.0023621628,0.000033723907,0.000027638862,0.00007282259,0.000041263636,0.99106103,0.00035315246,0.00078485697,0.00026457643,0.004932649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019863987,0.000010875265,0.00038739934,0.0000032405135,0.000006575875,0.0000073056817,0.000006678768,0.99926347,0.00005871711,0.00018645886,0.00006397188,0.000003303469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04392695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01821962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04392695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012107436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001292338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08734256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128534410","doi":"10.1177/1748006x21991036","title":"Evolving extreme events caused by climate change: A tail based Bayesian approach for extreme event risk analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Iceberg; Extreme value theory; Event (particle physics); Climate change; Bayesian inference; Inference; Natural (archaeology); Natural hazard; Submarine pipeline; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering); Statistics; Meteorology; Geography; Engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Artificial intelligence; Oceanography; Geotechnical engineering; Sea ice","score_opus":0.01546105915871588,"score_gpt":0.21997357701951867,"score_spread":0.2045125178608028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128534410","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036420058,0.00011887103,0.9954342,0.000072106355,0.000009574269,0.00002109927,0.00003424292,0.00006521084,0.0006025849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55644566,0.0017260829,0.43298087,0.00027128393,0.00029098356,0.00041811974,0.0006567548,0.00024495376,0.0069653047],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983637,0.00071986095,0.00008888219,0.00026279406,0.00043442933,0.00013034932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623704,0.002544413,0.000408986,0.00020017137,0.00048316785,0.00012626866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003856336,0.00095694786,0.0013599071,0.0020617945,0.00057161966,0.0015625644,0.002212763,0.0014038548,0.0025646847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009720803,0.0009885291,0.0015122549,0.0013039595,0.0011623374,0.0019438029,0.0016857393,0.0019447588,0.00053859875],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053249318,0.00005152431,0.0026864295,0.000092677794,0.00014525081,0.00019670025,0.00013040281,0.89112085,0.0014195343,0.053933408,0.0010630221,0.0491069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000441778,0.000018372044,0.00045512695,0.000012789817,0.00002251808,0.00004534168,0.000014485853,0.97682744,0.00014313245,0.021895632,0.0005441287,0.000016713346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005204912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055150636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005204912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090044754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010898644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020394444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212767643","doi":"10.1177/1748006x221078128","title":"Optimizing a joint reliability-redundancy allocation problem with common cause multi-state failures using immune algorithm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Ryerson University","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Reliability (semiconductor); Component (thermodynamics); Reliability engineering; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; State (computer science); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Optimal allocation; Algorithm; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010533831006841916,"score_gpt":0.2101583616257019,"score_spread":0.19962453061885999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212767643","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12815745,0.0006417851,0.8647187,0.0006292356,0.00006207461,0.00012886027,0.00009098178,0.0002758949,0.0052949777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89246595,0.00024742508,0.103159495,0.00017197135,0.00005591287,0.00030485832,0.0001231618,0.000057366302,0.0034137599],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914193,0.00034881174,0.00003376607,0.00017821889,0.00011517458,0.00018213423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982973,0.0012040125,0.00019439858,0.00004972772,0.00016941957,0.00008508762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017779082,0.001161587,0.0017832852,0.0009707012,0.00047439194,0.0010428345,0.0010914993,0.001821118,0.0020308585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028354297,0.00074926397,0.0010439428,0.0007617024,0.0007685734,0.0010353043,0.0011635127,0.0009953225,0.00016293096],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004260908,0.00004882966,0.00028336994,0.000042649168,0.000034904042,0.000043313074,0.000015901214,0.9920563,0.00032697304,0.0019382207,0.00025445706,0.0049125887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013526429,0.000030843126,0.00006796364,0.0000025146992,0.000008625484,0.000009458355,0.0000060117054,0.998362,0.00009721389,0.0013322642,0.00006711408,0.0000024435021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035832433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021174205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035832433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009546535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014773435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009402573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280573633","doi":"10.1177/1748006x211070641","title":"Guest Editorial: Reliability analysis for infrastructure systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.0035580909791516997,"score_gpt":0.20220504226633576,"score_spread":0.19864695128718407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280573633","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005563899,0.0045187636,0.0003370412,0.019148178,0.9742698,0.000012587974,0.000038833234,0.000059046135,0.0015601424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005500471,0.004095546,0.00012969376,0.0048637292,0.9842242,0.000010158225,0.000024456902,0.00004834959,0.006053852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621886,0.0005052716,0.00048391763,0.0004821179,0.0020703415,0.00023948372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98226446,0.0061750202,0.0007762614,0.0005004486,0.008385342,0.0018986302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004846028,0.004626889,0.003149699,0.0035827837,0.0022989078,0.00628997,0.0032039678,0.012737188,0.014937527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017036123,0.0011042751,0.0027996968,0.0013340337,0.0019411321,0.0040820385,0.0010559004,0.014802218,0.012795908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004104041,0.000021521599,0.000028459519,0.00019710297,0.00002112674,0.00016069626,0.000007577846,0.000107253196,0.00010208993,0.00045724306,0.9931664,0.005689622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007077169,0.00006192368,0.00042138653,0.0004304439,0.000072811075,0.0005734533,0.000032396016,0.0009074128,0.00032257827,0.002708333,0.99436814,0.000030258041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078651647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016375585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014937527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020692428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017397942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049970984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308588613","doi":"10.1177/1748006x221130540","title":"Efficient reliability computation of consecutive-k-out-of-n: F systems with shared components","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Markov chain; Reliability (semiconductor); Disjoint sets; Computation; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Markov model; Reliability theory; Markov process; Algorithm; Function (biology); State space; Reliability engineering; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Failure rate; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0085190713278502,"score_gpt":0.19835309440730436,"score_spread":0.18983402307945416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308588613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058218375,0.00018059021,0.9393834,0.00006625845,0.000013525253,0.000030696603,0.000048705937,0.00018464444,0.0018738507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87896514,0.00020999064,0.11850204,0.000022744465,0.000020475769,0.0000691743,0.0001276631,0.00009233506,0.0019904354],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976724,0.000064332264,0.000016049065,0.000045100693,0.000062415376,0.000044798177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998429,0.0010608038,0.00016689453,0.00008202096,0.00021855869,0.000042701515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083014707,0.0006260077,0.0008468799,0.00064621435,0.00037889482,0.0006473304,0.0008608252,0.0005892911,0.0022732855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037766062,0.0003528686,0.0005854225,0.00049518014,0.0005642844,0.0009866698,0.00057402987,0.0005615205,0.0002537414],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003121519,0.000013951964,0.0007051744,0.000048034286,0.000017088862,0.00009991671,0.00006165531,0.9703926,0.0017622192,0.012379733,0.00022007214,0.014268431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001096715,0.000005355741,0.000060784856,0.0000016965693,0.0000022218107,0.000013136699,0.0000043767513,0.9973724,0.00030624404,0.0021764366,0.00005440458,0.0000018570245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063341176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006941997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063341176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000754374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011912476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012594521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378218810","doi":"10.1177/1748006x231174960","title":"Optimal condition based maintenance using attribute Bayesian control chart","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Control chart; Control limits; Condition-based maintenance; Partially observable Markov decision process; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Statistical process control; Markov chain; Reliability engineering; Data mining; Chart; Statistics; Machine learning; Process (computing); Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Markov model; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007363713392144142,"score_gpt":0.21016631024795443,"score_spread":0.20280259685581029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378218810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030020103,0.00033561606,0.96592474,0.00014282955,0.00003343977,0.00012779736,0.0001316164,0.00055027637,0.0027336013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387833,0.00021813958,0.059598442,0.000038562317,0.000023588706,0.00014511398,0.00016824625,0.00003674701,0.0009878282],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853015,0.0003408226,0.00007173085,0.00034830158,0.0005213877,0.00018753567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708456,0.0014491597,0.00052991405,0.00014665628,0.0006632073,0.00012649725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024544331,0.0010826415,0.0012565228,0.0009833495,0.00050798943,0.0019320098,0.0011288761,0.0008535181,0.0017393361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006044241,0.00040453736,0.0005633869,0.00070078793,0.00086468284,0.0012676512,0.0007686965,0.0010593296,0.00017114819],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001083421,0.00004340825,0.0006143201,0.000045759924,0.00001682656,0.000033921155,0.000040032064,0.96384454,0.0014725344,0.0069905836,0.00043755674,0.026352277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009846106,0.000030165109,0.00016306309,0.0000043566797,0.0000055036317,0.00000546151,0.0000028320217,0.99762374,0.00035399146,0.0016549495,0.00014058755,0.0000054847583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010768332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040914007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010768332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015927902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00194934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0214113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382795996","doi":"10.1177/1748006x231184289","title":"A model-based safety analysis approach for airborne systems using state traversals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Software Reliability and Analysis Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Aeronautical Science Foundation of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Fault tree analysis; Computer science; Reliability engineering; State space; Model checking; Markov chain; Certification; Markov model; Reduction (mathematics); State (computer science); Simulation; Engineering; Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024536700723139366,"score_gpt":0.2639670540791575,"score_spread":0.23943035335601812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382795996","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036933064,0.000032159565,0.99514467,0.000025285097,0.000005346674,0.00002225549,0.000030518124,0.00054760074,0.00049881084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3934005,0.00024575045,0.6025,0.00005194627,0.00002639588,0.00024756725,0.00040715587,0.00025139848,0.0028692107],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965537,0.00007828729,0.000022099828,0.00006515894,0.00014481657,0.000034319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995122,0.00023715022,0.00006880305,0.00007036021,0.00009489516,0.00001675825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041389983,0.0008745239,0.00058956555,0.00097055425,0.0005340793,0.00069300353,0.0007423865,0.0005520065,0.0025236644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012578778,0.0004872202,0.0014220697,0.00046521306,0.00049443333,0.0010298216,0.0008449406,0.0011059137,0.00034590074],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039712122,0.00005739186,0.00070997205,0.0000916392,0.00003708764,0.0001297791,0.00014736505,0.894077,0.010362981,0.026325261,0.0007121951,0.06730965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031592344,0.00001764893,0.000053994758,0.00000581132,0.0000083651175,0.000019255087,0.000007852472,0.99305046,0.00082297006,0.005332648,0.00067386526,0.0000039698302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008954197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008800417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008954197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067110034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014290002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017804146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388340785","doi":"10.1177/1748006x231207169","title":"A rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on a new data fusion mechanism and improved CNN","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convolutional neural network; Computer science; Block (permutation group theory); Fault (geology); Bearing (navigation); Information fusion; Residual; Artificial intelligence; Sensor fusion; Pattern recognition (psychology); Data mining; Artificial neural network; Feature (linguistics); Fusion; Algorithm","score_opus":0.016407218415950296,"score_gpt":0.27577646154586816,"score_spread":0.2593692431299179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388340785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041572414,0.0006233593,0.9528235,0.00024278117,0.00016564243,0.00008776246,0.00011812986,0.0021019108,0.0022644775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6429356,0.00045650773,0.35016116,0.00023722596,0.00012818872,0.000097803895,0.00047131718,0.00008876352,0.005423379],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996216,0.000021936497,0.000024781992,0.00013433736,0.00014086868,0.000056481353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999708,0.000037645892,0.000030124183,0.00004189846,0.00016557451,0.000016758848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005172934,0.00086343836,0.00078530854,0.00093757716,0.00034940394,0.00055130693,0.0010676576,0.0008588765,0.0013746578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087091496,0.0003935176,0.00072890293,0.0007179371,0.00030716328,0.001412974,0.00079041405,0.00071820704,0.00037214937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030531222,0.0001351051,0.003309034,0.00014246257,0.00016435792,0.0002508373,0.00009937781,0.11611452,0.10838687,0.0033218553,0.0037015534,0.7640687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016145183,0.00008152246,0.0014959355,0.000007495659,0.000057113844,0.00014549565,0.000011001346,0.97081053,0.024973495,0.0005737674,0.0018093252,0.00001814009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012603479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010402893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012603479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070805755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008918573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025060236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399919403","doi":"10.1177/1748006x241252469","title":"Continual learning for fault diagnosis considering variable working conditions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canada First Research Excellence Fund; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Fault (geology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.00884755273941571,"score_gpt":0.24928751419827097,"score_spread":0.24043996145885527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399919403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18881889,0.00062207744,0.8072115,0.00022427777,0.000054467182,0.000076559605,0.00004786808,0.0011992772,0.0017451427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380008,0.00009755672,0.060798414,0.000048318863,0.000027030961,0.00006127809,0.00005854467,0.00003153565,0.0008764223],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955136,0.00009133518,0.000032593533,0.00017057183,0.000110897774,0.000043073345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825746,0.0010094563,0.00018358871,0.00022690553,0.0002673751,0.00005514604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018069287,0.00058056216,0.00059579505,0.0005561233,0.00038276124,0.0005868722,0.0011943249,0.00081384723,0.0007201576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042617684,0.00042043414,0.00034188334,0.0003758825,0.00084375875,0.0011207098,0.0011478902,0.001046285,0.00020472599],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028208012,0.00020341626,0.0038853525,0.000094236544,0.0000442977,0.00014525725,0.00023637216,0.7081874,0.008943823,0.0015530706,0.00051314494,0.27591145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043514424,0.00005154549,0.0004277593,0.000003912642,0.000003594728,0.00002539064,0.000010837048,0.9972811,0.0011307356,0.0008928615,0.00016273247,0.0000052464147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026333593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026210484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026333593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005082149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006396448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009556055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407334470","doi":"10.1177/1748006x251314506","title":"Robust inference and model selection for data from one-shot devices under cyclic accelerated life-tests with an application to a test of CSP solder joints","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Soldering; One shot; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Computer science; Model selection; Reliability engineering; Engineering drawing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Materials science; Mechanical engineering; Composite material; Geology","score_opus":0.15210944091594922,"score_gpt":0.34818249347216357,"score_spread":0.19607305255621435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407334470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015951054,0.00015098065,0.9835187,0.00009654729,0.000007870327,0.000021612288,0.00005009906,0.00007660578,0.00012660064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6257733,0.0005718593,0.37139043,0.00015325882,0.00009270174,0.0003274147,0.0007254325,0.00008801728,0.00087758666],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937668,0.004173988,0.00023840972,0.0007259726,0.00094345585,0.00015143682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94302595,0.050577328,0.0022386995,0.0023437866,0.0015740782,0.00024017887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018826945,0.0011172774,0.0013915893,0.0015309798,0.0004178717,0.0012281904,0.0019558046,0.0016187932,0.0006377854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06918073,0.0005311706,0.0012837737,0.001035768,0.0019785122,0.0016947824,0.0016971446,0.0021838436,0.00016171442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022836069,0.00010777853,0.0059398427,0.00020146609,0.00036539015,0.00029769834,0.00020503529,0.8480274,0.0046185614,0.059610076,0.0005057786,0.07989266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001752325,0.00007126624,0.00083400786,0.000013263192,0.000019388202,0.000049113733,0.000014643946,0.96897596,0.00104077,0.02870674,0.00023382566,0.000023419892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019863397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013077927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018826945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076036877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013292865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09956759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}