{"meta":{"query_hash":"7699fc2acd53","filters":{"venue":"Public Administration"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7699fc2acd53","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1535853360","doi":"10.1111/padm.12184","title":"DETERMINANTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEDIATIZATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ADAPTATION OF SWEDISH GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TO NEWS MEDIA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Media management; Adaptation (eye); Government (linguistics); Media coverage; Affect (linguistics); Organizational structure; Business; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies","score_opus":0.06942274079313049,"score_gpt":0.3322231872913237,"score_spread":0.26280044649819323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535853360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984211,0.000046270558,0.000097597724,0.00006158171,0.0000017655465,0.000008547519,0.000027226284,0.0000019391919,0.0013339927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972504,0.00004003018,0.00004336095,0.000008322325,0.0000038430235,0.0000064685337,0.000043265038,0.0000018335692,0.00012788273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959935,0.0019256372,0.00039260378,0.00029931005,0.00082046393,0.0005684627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661212,0.015240411,0.012765119,0.0017518868,0.0023949347,0.0017263611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020890266,0.00025863,0.00025020487,0.0020769888,0.0008230531,0.0030677726,0.00042477646,0.00041686092,0.0020885307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020125818,0.00022843413,0.0002873495,0.0024749658,0.0016626408,0.000978103,0.0020212452,0.00059111055,0.0002888944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006555716,0.000084562154,0.9754716,0.0000350662,0.00004372191,0.00019812679,0.015515894,0.00026348405,0.0003657289,0.00042344793,0.0001533918,0.007379403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015021819,0.000037199454,0.97685224,0.000019479403,0.000011846684,0.000094020295,0.021602582,0.00026479014,0.00012578425,0.000105151325,0.0008780353,0.0000073386273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01051203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008659507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01051203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012007098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011926828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02090168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596845526","doi":"10.1111/padm.12198","title":"TRANSGOVERNMENTAL POLICY NETWORKS IN THE ANGLOSPHERE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Situated; Public administration; Public policy; Political science; Policy transfer; Administration (probate law); Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06908654125971815,"score_gpt":0.36071659362942043,"score_spread":0.2916300523697023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596845526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.626306,0.002814635,0.0101871155,0.013379505,0.00008440736,0.00006984429,0.000048801412,0.000051339888,0.34705824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946228,0.00038579738,0.0007795065,0.00018028573,0.000004762919,0.000024720719,0.000009341721,0.0000067656,0.0039860234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597293,0.0027996618,0.000083534294,0.000305966,0.00030267055,0.0005351987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959485,0.0021657175,0.00057897886,0.00034414377,0.00044589632,0.0005166983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040514604,0.00013670654,0.00025423346,0.001358156,0.0085386485,0.007969799,0.0005617419,0.00084536185,0.004236974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056711156,0.00027955056,0.00012232683,0.0017148334,0.013760733,0.0068738875,0.00785292,0.0015091922,0.0003294538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034414476,0.00004112844,0.0093206735,0.000066372275,0.000012513619,0.00038205937,0.19425249,0.0009615291,0.00030477863,0.76113987,0.001649764,0.03183435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026076408,0.000053702235,0.022772817,0.00052381144,0.00002196696,0.00028602828,0.3658775,0.0027313216,0.00048040002,0.27102113,0.33616096,0.000044287306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050748065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07817575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050748065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011731253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009919227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1009053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662542501","doi":"10.1111/padm.12175","title":"UNDERSTANDING HYBRIDITY IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":324,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Public sector; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public relations; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.4552793757901237,"score_gpt":0.4269935463645355,"score_spread":0.02828582942558816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662542501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5356938,0.003005934,0.18551306,0.017597489,0.00015416807,0.00012205484,0.0000931655,0.00010954885,0.2577107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933882,0.00022426601,0.004920555,0.00012996899,0.000023062306,0.000041698837,0.00002533,0.000010747433,0.0012361634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904523,0.006590438,0.00025259296,0.0008888094,0.0008486616,0.00096716196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907286,0.006386153,0.001352723,0.0015390282,0.00081916543,0.00083001354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00800173,0.00029934966,0.0004346976,0.0032549486,0.005185013,0.010217611,0.0011987927,0.0019499655,0.0048427912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010812154,0.00033650015,0.0007894724,0.0024343692,0.02668207,0.015871333,0.009721326,0.0018712869,0.0003633716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088696415,0.000012176896,0.0016604995,0.000021027194,0.000005411861,0.000073125855,0.00965655,0.00055247586,0.00008451595,0.98444515,0.00012578399,0.0033543329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073798337,0.000017399112,0.0014797477,0.000053379157,0.0000062644863,0.00012857097,0.018642463,0.0023412171,0.00009353113,0.9644716,0.012748324,0.000010190846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025001834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015731609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010217611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055696294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019947658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04231769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970065311","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00270","title":"Rational Management, Performance Targets and Executive Agencies: Views from Agency Chief Executives in Northern Ireland","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Business; Service delivery framework; Northern ireland; Public relations; Senior management; New public management; Central government; Performance management; Public sector; Public administration; Service (business); Focus (optics); Local government; Political science; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.059992979158390754,"score_gpt":0.34893464312250866,"score_spread":0.2889416639641179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970065311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485178,0.0023115438,0.0003803022,0.01819731,0.00016300331,0.000072462215,0.00003311111,0.0000163895,0.030308062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990471,0.0011089436,0.0001518682,0.0019696786,0.000062854604,0.000024119152,0.000017965896,0.00001103451,0.006182584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98007584,0.011397926,0.00089612824,0.00064450566,0.0026460213,0.0043396093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97358376,0.010721549,0.005318979,0.00059774803,0.005142814,0.004635187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016135165,0.0002999513,0.0004410208,0.0014680394,0.007262001,0.010701822,0.0012537679,0.0017142433,0.001830434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02400511,0.0005226304,0.00022742317,0.0019743906,0.007764649,0.002865823,0.003982635,0.0038536317,0.00029548455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017264232,0.0001307894,0.03390572,0.00032353634,0.000026018402,0.0027474437,0.91798335,0.00037396658,0.0012527668,0.007391927,0.012607147,0.02308481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102271215,0.000095436095,0.015756285,0.00014483511,0.000006773686,0.00029568205,0.9362967,0.00014885662,0.00022470077,0.00028173148,0.046703547,0.000035323344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0869709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12904808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0869709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01758095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013426848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17292935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975219832","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01809.x","title":"HOW TO ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM? INVESTIGATING THE ADOPTION AND PRELIMINARY IMPACTS OF THE NORWEGIAN WELFARE ADMINISTRATION REFORM","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Context (archaeology); Welfare reform; Autonomy; Public economics; Welfare; Politics; Administration (probate law); Process (computing); Economics; Public administration; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.09016467142494265,"score_gpt":0.38304608222163267,"score_spread":0.29288141079669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975219832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93344116,0.001262875,0.0038288436,0.007401015,0.00010930154,0.0005936756,0.00023622307,0.00003194783,0.053094897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606234,0.0002723876,0.0019017296,0.00038547523,0.000028579165,0.00016957425,0.00006547697,0.000011839562,0.0011026035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9164736,0.060314704,0.0033473643,0.0035995194,0.012041332,0.0042233937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85186255,0.08600487,0.021884225,0.008418376,0.029496487,0.0023335153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07012106,0.0005103941,0.0007967193,0.0031627452,0.0027125515,0.0071436986,0.0014102578,0.0019191005,0.0036996487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14748484,0.0004002967,0.00071945204,0.0045918995,0.009833324,0.009806867,0.0051619415,0.0022282817,0.00029840448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009926104,0.0013302014,0.5189368,0.0015731198,0.00037296585,0.0006856343,0.112077236,0.010757127,0.005329556,0.17021364,0.0034299395,0.17430118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014543353,0.0016762885,0.80359787,0.00068267965,0.00024373658,0.00007046092,0.12761228,0.0066988547,0.0043686037,0.013270654,0.041473188,0.00015983354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085402794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10032659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085402794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023674637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014771925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977095901","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x","title":"WAS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUCH A GOOD IDEA? A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Argument (complex analysis); Corporate governance; Politics; Government (linguistics); Local government; Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.14115930239632735,"score_gpt":0.420598985497123,"score_spread":0.27943968310079564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977095901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13592957,0.047792763,0.008234324,0.16782986,0.0005033742,0.00003044398,0.00017718461,0.00005358087,0.6394489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830345,0.008332372,0.00056066195,0.0032948179,0.00022203168,0.000019187872,0.0000428519,0.000019089932,0.004474395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626595,0.0028137332,0.00004181146,0.00026084555,0.0001928582,0.00042482233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855584,0.0007718216,0.00014994443,0.00020362667,0.00015756945,0.00016109133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034771718,0.0002783227,0.0004263836,0.0018174207,0.0021976035,0.0075851125,0.00051344873,0.002000144,0.0057850657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021241088,0.00012366172,0.00024759048,0.002574464,0.016243588,0.008446765,0.002519427,0.0020701764,0.00025702777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002168718,0.00001312364,0.0015343545,0.00017161755,0.000018580231,0.00014773928,0.0089462735,0.00061120914,0.00015251861,0.9686394,0.0040871254,0.015656462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021947206,0.0001470576,0.015873715,0.0013146298,0.00005451504,0.00042485457,0.09297607,0.0007981266,0.00043256363,0.42325187,0.46466765,0.000036944737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054071923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070921327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075851125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070511843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015556862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051160157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988975138","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01844.x","title":"MECHANISMS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN EU REGULATORY POLICY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Politics; Constructivism (international relations); Collective action; Conflict management; European union; Sociology; Economics; International relations","score_opus":0.03017416709435131,"score_gpt":0.27396460561561603,"score_spread":0.24379043852126472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988975138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079047956,0.006678027,0.36494502,0.03626351,0.00052855763,0.0005173955,0.00010195543,0.00028881585,0.51162875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96565276,0.0009934664,0.024245685,0.0010500816,0.00018991348,0.0006083932,0.00003674618,0.000045561592,0.007177452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9610066,0.025307639,0.0020660576,0.003761059,0.005092373,0.0027663156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97555804,0.016861409,0.0032822702,0.0019869755,0.001531279,0.00077997195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034278583,0.0009290357,0.0009779003,0.00630102,0.006728035,0.021765277,0.0039237253,0.0072249924,0.008935607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0330942,0.0010374577,0.0017443806,0.004362144,0.041551698,0.018112747,0.013028024,0.004143933,0.00066971924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003110086,0.0000046091477,0.00009987478,0.00001349681,0.000005619519,0.000025656718,0.000806495,0.000566064,0.000025314075,0.9970988,0.00012127278,0.0012296301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001773867,0.000010904719,0.00019066264,0.000076426084,0.0000082834695,0.000043849606,0.00096568186,0.0016099472,0.000104882216,0.98901016,0.007946419,0.00001515428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017511826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081575924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034278583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009881124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059173377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18128467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993448166","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00256","title":"The Lost Legitimacy: Property, Business Power and the Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Leverhulme Trust; Manchester Metropolitan University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Competition (biology); Constitution; Politics; Accountability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political economy; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03152106397148123,"score_gpt":0.3043101881480836,"score_spread":0.27278912417660234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993448166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069065854,0.018425068,0.011926466,0.20142597,0.0015076041,0.000039458755,0.000087220906,0.00007153649,0.6974507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96113056,0.0036927932,0.0011787397,0.0051403255,0.0010264046,0.000054004682,0.00003782711,0.000054338936,0.027685042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357283,0.002919206,0.00017077128,0.00064783695,0.0015176956,0.0011716859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913625,0.005893339,0.000589376,0.0009045963,0.00072205183,0.00052810594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071676834,0.00030174223,0.0005323977,0.0021609191,0.009849359,0.017214818,0.0011796751,0.005498732,0.0057595014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017607853,0.00034216064,0.0003620992,0.0021642179,0.088054605,0.016056629,0.007470264,0.007903473,0.0007975309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040495256,0.000003969709,0.0000730795,0.0000055417213,0.0000010053684,0.000034669767,0.0010224096,0.000042801894,0.000016280494,0.9954797,0.0014653247,0.0018511662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000985261,0.0000060392867,0.00017252329,0.00005819655,0.0000016946655,0.000037016645,0.0008352103,0.00011534208,0.000044692646,0.9648027,0.033910424,0.000006256784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008560504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007507272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017214818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007330436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071092304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053186238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005810389","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00368.x","title":"Cabinet Government: An Elusive Ideal?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Criticism; Proposition; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.035699984231947195,"score_gpt":0.298077534154662,"score_spread":0.2623775499227148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005810389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04281265,0.011316085,0.013640989,0.37921065,0.0017016624,0.000028448685,0.000119986435,0.00018862661,0.5509808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95250416,0.0028595047,0.0024448263,0.018619334,0.00063636753,0.00004446069,0.00008197475,0.00011898388,0.022690559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878368,0.006677806,0.00031436404,0.0010893444,0.0018865692,0.002195009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910357,0.003955864,0.00088181265,0.0011209588,0.0017921262,0.001213614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009781682,0.0002516564,0.0005846753,0.0016130867,0.011161089,0.017097333,0.0011858145,0.005510003,0.008339161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024131438,0.00033059463,0.0003328714,0.0031517418,0.035211697,0.016749186,0.0049205306,0.008729739,0.0016752883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006571022,0.0000032529535,0.00013962561,0.000011185543,8.3428114e-7,0.000010548389,0.00118564,0.00003118141,0.000008335355,0.9907742,0.0042892396,0.0035393569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018932391,0.00001998193,0.0010370068,0.00036342218,0.0000049844084,0.000083374216,0.010697226,0.00042393262,0.00014184933,0.69303554,0.2941535,0.000020319414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016277842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015391949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017097333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088121835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011307046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06393719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010157159","doi":"10.1111/padm.12126","title":"CONTROL PATTERNS IN CONTRACTING‐OUT RELATIONSHIPS: IT MATTERS WHAT YOU DO, NOT WHO YOU ARE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Hierarchy; Control (management); Corporate governance; Neglect; Service (business); Business; Control variable; Public relations; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Management; Market economy; Psychology; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.09138552575451299,"score_gpt":0.37792247786321603,"score_spread":0.28653695210870306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010157159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98480564,0.00045138857,0.003388475,0.0012431993,0.000011724933,0.00007133924,0.000108036525,0.000013779807,0.0099063385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992312,0.00007514446,0.00020664227,0.00007173509,0.0000061897895,0.0000142967265,0.000053559914,0.0000055293694,0.0003356311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301153,0.0031686139,0.00062015024,0.0007770741,0.0013128598,0.0011097018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428316,0.030129114,0.017169738,0.003897324,0.0025913033,0.0033811296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008257481,0.00024224809,0.00037400593,0.0016160903,0.0021453837,0.0025129188,0.00065236655,0.00057374925,0.0039053892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032927938,0.0002755606,0.0003164728,0.0026818386,0.0043377704,0.0016265514,0.0021324067,0.0012399293,0.00023621036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016125488,0.00020368591,0.9081919,0.00011369016,0.0000612656,0.00019193425,0.046222012,0.00019201901,0.0006523509,0.01290674,0.00065288425,0.030450288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026639791,0.00010578548,0.9371898,0.00012628535,0.000042813735,0.0003001957,0.046804037,0.0011867593,0.00057192304,0.009100211,0.0045061684,0.000039305705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031043641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024799174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031043641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025621646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002304416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061725914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011543177","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00459.x","title":"Proving the Potential of Independent Commissions: A Critical Review of the Richard Commission on the Powers and Electoral Arrangements of the National Assembly for Wales","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Llywodraeth Cymru; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Commission; Insider; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Politics; Law; Administration (probate law); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.12369947039710202,"score_gpt":0.418915967783011,"score_spread":0.29521649738590894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011543177","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007438131,0.9790495,0.00022139179,0.013929476,0.0014825538,0.00003996304,0.000019537487,0.0000031920754,0.0045105126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022860331,0.9686365,0.0005666118,0.0058318228,0.0010133706,0.000069408234,0.000036781315,0.000009585331,0.000975561],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.954995,0.02799296,0.003843331,0.0015240374,0.010575442,0.0010691478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89465624,0.07719012,0.0061044814,0.0016392522,0.019619767,0.0007901274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050150566,0.0007670442,0.002198443,0.010087649,0.0023566408,0.008782923,0.0020102225,0.00457848,0.001399275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11568051,0.0012349673,0.00080339087,0.014370485,0.007204308,0.006758017,0.0026107272,0.0053188484,0.0006234032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016307819,0.000046166464,0.0013073783,0.055335924,0.00035243444,0.00086842064,0.017854935,0.0006547498,0.0004417174,0.22555283,0.1727814,0.52464104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017400429,0.000072048664,0.0021426012,0.039284293,0.00014036181,0.0002485718,0.0047812867,0.00006981484,0.00022039512,0.0059539755,0.9470187,0.000050555213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03797323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060330115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050150566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013242809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03664925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2652247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018772302","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02003.x","title":"SYMPOSIUM OVERVIEW: CONCEPTUALIZING NEW GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Work (physics); Public administration; Political science; Multi-level governance; Key (lock); Economics; Management; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.14515042264605726,"score_gpt":0.42193473284441146,"score_spread":0.2767843101983542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018772302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017854262,0.21083778,0.089932986,0.23336257,0.039300766,0.00030454205,0.000684892,0.00044352206,0.40727875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43370125,0.31753194,0.05559375,0.02705835,0.028563432,0.0010239087,0.0020265738,0.0004944768,0.13400628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575555,0.0018844773,0.00029968665,0.00052421173,0.0010302284,0.00050585944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632484,0.0018776942,0.00035444862,0.0002355339,0.0007532658,0.00045419185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005981084,0.00075439527,0.0007015798,0.0033685523,0.0038607018,0.009945086,0.0021430086,0.0041658585,0.011153339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006660244,0.00061990926,0.001403961,0.003940813,0.0065156,0.015688224,0.0046012416,0.008823757,0.0016472507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011703236,0.000025348878,0.00047976658,0.0005333271,0.000010120099,0.0001138369,0.006118438,0.0007693117,0.00023519875,0.87300533,0.09345339,0.025244132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036290805,0.000031412535,0.00055345177,0.00078749406,0.000010818285,0.00014990773,0.004266708,0.00048205417,0.00014234023,0.09300612,0.9005413,0.00002484126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027968984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027176375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011153339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056457836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048387027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040963233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033370333","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01842.x","title":"TOWARDS GLOBAL SCHOLARSHIP IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Scholarship; Public administration; Administration (probate law); Excellence; Public service; Political science; Nationalism; Sociology; Sovereignty; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08824151112287518,"score_gpt":0.41650409942680827,"score_spread":0.32826258830393307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033370333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077418876,0.05036509,0.011682128,0.43947786,0.0043171407,0.000048141166,0.00007933882,0.0002348502,0.48605356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6725889,0.07684861,0.029211141,0.10295794,0.01315789,0.0005116512,0.0003382926,0.00066772354,0.10371784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806029,0.013707118,0.0004482491,0.0010819873,0.002333925,0.0018257047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97550225,0.01414003,0.0010581096,0.003469967,0.0024430375,0.0033866449],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028316673,0.00088728697,0.001124481,0.007559251,0.008146518,0.027794335,0.0019476301,0.012186318,0.011636941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016953055,0.00035812633,0.00082304055,0.010539897,0.041725866,0.027234014,0.018672546,0.01367046,0.002433001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031903055,0.000014531819,0.00013602887,0.00007241007,0.0000024564345,0.000024241801,0.0064375345,0.000068211484,0.000035705496,0.97075576,0.012744963,0.00970502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060964953,0.000012531752,0.00033091492,0.0005310439,0.0000038105875,0.000045701527,0.012272824,0.00012259242,0.00006069586,0.5485267,0.43808144,0.000005563355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004333382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005265558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97220564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016291272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03151032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1497547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035697834","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01792.x","title":"POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN AN AFRICAN STATE: AN EXTENSION OF KINGDON'S MULTIPLE‐STREAMS APPROACH","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Context (archaeology); STREAMS; Transferability; Extension (predicate logic); State (computer science); Empirical research; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Incentive; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.046135102814980185,"score_gpt":0.3830751511687941,"score_spread":0.3369400483538139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035697834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61408865,0.0011585503,0.081995666,0.024719093,0.00011702845,0.00082608685,0.00014312872,0.0000582479,0.2768935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880091,0.00044859093,0.008266642,0.00020985579,0.000016291166,0.00015561403,0.000008772992,0.000005690638,0.002879478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960913,0.002838953,0.000100255646,0.00014908217,0.00038105645,0.00043937407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639064,0.0023890554,0.00046291496,0.00020196091,0.00038214968,0.00017335363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048078015,0.00024932664,0.00038554685,0.0022835948,0.0030486898,0.0049188146,0.00085733394,0.0012465233,0.0041801515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008748514,0.0002946738,0.0006300675,0.002281444,0.0049274527,0.005377588,0.0051231286,0.0017084292,0.00015346988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045427376,0.00011950237,0.0076292916,0.000119772216,0.00001856359,0.0003859928,0.01929848,0.004971243,0.0001822303,0.9328992,0.0008196048,0.033510666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011798139,0.00027815846,0.016390458,0.0008119533,0.00013297772,0.00036243707,0.06855345,0.05261809,0.0010948054,0.78817666,0.07137964,0.00008352294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016223392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01202133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007953793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008761213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057709098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036747559","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00435.x","title":"Spin Control and Freedom of Information: Lessons for the United Kingdom from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Control (management); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Business; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.04344142266758387,"score_gpt":0.31537788329161176,"score_spread":0.2719364606240279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036747559","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08417592,0.07544848,0.0012473793,0.42177826,0.0017373331,0.00013362894,0.00066605775,0.000063936655,0.4147489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167409,0.05179627,0.0028611952,0.04602003,0.00023819214,0.00006460525,0.00034229673,0.000115021925,0.08182152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923189,0.0010987513,0.00030177104,0.00048143815,0.0020749986,0.0037240959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869486,0.0031140056,0.00034874806,0.0004838548,0.0061333464,0.0029713907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005373638,0.00050482387,0.001294005,0.0018670417,0.01746931,0.014400008,0.0022627434,0.0055394233,0.009452688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012097541,0.0003592315,0.0008628153,0.0033865294,0.0132965725,0.0059892116,0.0050266655,0.007169017,0.0007728383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041571076,0.000104724226,0.008378275,0.000674632,0.0000804727,0.0027349931,0.032456346,0.001773996,0.0004670905,0.6745861,0.16126814,0.11705955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015704666,0.000084247695,0.019563995,0.0023242508,0.00012073934,0.0004929184,0.056978267,0.0009143139,0.0006231482,0.068579644,0.8498592,0.00030224197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99753654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1834963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1834963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2232048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9470286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06613390136467633,"score_gpt":0.35489292659155425,"score_spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062435447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048446,0.0027093813,0.0038543711,0.006989579,0.00003131111,0.00026762293,0.00015449335,0.000020543337,0.08112821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180096,0.0013750264,0.002561027,0.00023741428,0.000009895064,0.000078730875,0.00006576894,0.000016535183,0.0038546214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352163,0.0027589398,0.00019225139,0.00037231695,0.0014794527,0.0016754759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877406,0.006556722,0.0011110358,0.00042031324,0.0020594979,0.001078414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007975396,0.00038752987,0.0006162992,0.0026114513,0.017161388,0.006576316,0.002430241,0.0013343025,0.003360987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019072102,0.000394269,0.00039323748,0.0070606624,0.017505711,0.004097934,0.005239602,0.0023076653,0.00011976953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052963707,0.00011433191,0.04205206,0.00021722946,0.000032206382,0.0016732818,0.7531856,0.0015102936,0.00020451592,0.16527563,0.0021171032,0.03356488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025418907,0.000047366193,0.103942454,0.000408594,0.00004067252,0.00025616083,0.8248477,0.0038516528,0.0001637976,0.021946097,0.04440989,0.000060252594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09743371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09743371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08367603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70693433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081282679","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00357","title":"Ethics, values and behaviours: comparison of three case studies examining the paucity of leadership in government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pillar; Public relations; Public service; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Ethical leadership; Public administration; Political science; Service (business); Business; Law; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.7788923445721057,"score_gpt":0.5100501830772671,"score_spread":0.2688421614948385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081282679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98607385,0.0007622698,0.00072626944,0.0013794263,0.00003326623,0.000106029634,0.00003266633,0.0000060099674,0.01088027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952838,0.0011197143,0.00065401365,0.0002165017,0.00001217824,0.00012171604,0.000034065357,0.000012321052,0.0025456536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98342586,0.012298801,0.00057130493,0.00042487675,0.0015740048,0.0017051973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95680195,0.033967838,0.0031849153,0.0013341097,0.0027764891,0.0019347173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011836394,0.00045274897,0.00062024733,0.0036387707,0.0142598385,0.007236504,0.0018366667,0.0037243562,0.0026593173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030625988,0.00068898714,0.00049767934,0.005814866,0.009738633,0.0038486393,0.0055452455,0.0030022983,0.00041194135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090969705,0.00032232603,0.019022042,0.00025335845,0.000018668254,0.0072829262,0.9474775,0.000220147,0.00036540857,0.01101582,0.0014459221,0.012484805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113286105,0.00006449953,0.009686045,0.00025827877,0.000012749763,0.0018236061,0.9748628,0.00018948465,0.00030198036,0.00086343876,0.011905345,0.000020411717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03364461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10175157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03364461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013268767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062363725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09627211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086548991","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01854.x","title":"LIFE AND DEATH OF AN INSTITUTION: THE CASE OF COLLECTIVE WHEAT MARKETING IN AUSTRALIA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Demise; Politics; Institutional change; Reproduction; Institutionalism; New institutionalism; Sociology; Historical institutionalism; Positive economics; Political economy; Political science; Social science; Economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.045932495192283915,"score_gpt":0.34646018847504345,"score_spread":0.3005276932827595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086548991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87767214,0.0011375953,0.0019140508,0.032153033,0.00008180412,0.00007328295,0.000010136852,0.00001279916,0.08694504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915815,0.0003853781,0.00034157588,0.00083411805,0.00003108326,0.000017939255,0.0000035605617,0.00000819085,0.00679658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923854,0.0038579926,0.00014717165,0.0005038661,0.0008538793,0.0022516726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282324,0.0026179228,0.0010247573,0.00036201917,0.0008120235,0.002360085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007704315,0.00027994768,0.0006426218,0.00144013,0.036710065,0.009990759,0.0024635694,0.00783841,0.0035362276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010531248,0.00054969,0.0004574694,0.0013448091,0.02938308,0.0069401106,0.010188159,0.009061624,0.00032162567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007263756,0.00025221205,0.01070439,0.00008455848,0.00002110572,0.014844341,0.5990643,0.0007829773,0.00063683843,0.35489327,0.0025904416,0.01605294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004226616,0.0002089863,0.029107098,0.00037236797,0.000038053025,0.002600326,0.7209238,0.004813134,0.00062909466,0.08465316,0.15649815,0.00011350464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16618857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21402277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16618857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02770201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013397229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3304425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105566173","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01836.x","title":"LEADERSHIP STYLE, CRISIS RESPONSE AND BLAME MANAGEMENT: THE CASE OF HURRICANE KATRINA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Newcastle Australia","keywords":"Blame; Crisis management; Hurricane katrina; Politics; Political science; Leadership style; Public relations; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology; Natural disaster; Law; History; Geography","score_opus":0.041115267215470604,"score_gpt":0.3164825033139023,"score_spread":0.2753672360984317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105566173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96684885,0.00023207343,0.00066818955,0.0131582795,0.00007231948,0.000036972808,0.000019942347,0.000012899813,0.018950557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756855,0.00019510998,0.00041021395,0.00046484394,0.000024834091,0.000016557371,0.0000095664545,0.000005850199,0.0013044047],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975672,0.0017620442,0.000037527465,0.00005478783,0.00014625787,0.00043216365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994549,0.002856861,0.0007575944,0.00015841605,0.000367384,0.0013107433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002632843,0.00029009447,0.00029423783,0.0008502946,0.0112396525,0.0031611205,0.0010072739,0.0025307261,0.0032772727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077015553,0.00023840413,0.00026446316,0.0009171976,0.004961339,0.0017706174,0.002458483,0.0036823782,0.00028880793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004092176,0.0013787473,0.09511125,0.00021143572,0.00007421456,0.040897224,0.75411177,0.0030683859,0.0018981303,0.059651542,0.016000379,0.027187774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006225673,0.0002145858,0.053358104,0.00010074656,0.000024455885,0.0036613352,0.90201056,0.003264282,0.00042358562,0.01094531,0.02587559,0.000059223024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018227391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05413678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018227391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003112627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023591039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036242604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113206757","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00698.x","title":"POLICY DESIGN FOR LEGITIMACY: EXPERT KNOWLEDGE, CITIZENS, TIME AND INCLUSION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM’S BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTOR","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Inclusion (mineral); Narrative; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.08998183470126617,"score_gpt":0.3905297206880784,"score_spread":0.30054788598681226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113206757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50622773,0.003866744,0.032352258,0.18509752,0.00036959045,0.00028593396,0.00006280655,0.00011469289,0.2716228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106807,0.0003007294,0.0028742007,0.0016069752,0.000018350334,0.00009265985,0.000008230227,0.000015358106,0.0040155347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9213137,0.06635175,0.0026630543,0.0014992394,0.004590738,0.0035815735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8825836,0.1022382,0.0052478034,0.0033329625,0.004743842,0.00185363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039471384,0.00044193593,0.0005557476,0.0019571418,0.015899466,0.019790117,0.0010600726,0.007415656,0.005002723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0737677,0.0004954977,0.0004959274,0.0019576512,0.030833151,0.011964344,0.009100882,0.0043014647,0.00045552038],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014213909,0.000106411564,0.0058381013,0.00037665066,0.00001709148,0.0009482516,0.2512494,0.0016947591,0.00060540455,0.7015357,0.0063642785,0.031121802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013949093,0.00021867016,0.009567388,0.0014412549,0.00006724889,0.0006708702,0.26374364,0.0040488876,0.002745477,0.39721113,0.3199793,0.00016660316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028818967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026866445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034891635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01980667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25315773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114327298","doi":"10.1111/padm.12199","title":"HOW PUBLIC SERVICE LEADERSHIP IS STUDIED: AN EXAMINATION OF A QUARTER CENTURY OF SCHOLARSHIP","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Public service; Public relations; Quarter (Canadian coin); Diversity (politics); Exploratory research; Public sector; Service (business); Leadership studies; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Leadership style; Business; Social science; Marketing","score_opus":0.3780762306924821,"score_gpt":0.4160277530872755,"score_spread":0.037951522394793435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114327298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5166623,0.24528159,0.0026808826,0.15711756,0.002320865,0.000055555818,0.00021327108,0.00007016179,0.075597815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106241,0.07975891,0.0008978083,0.0058958535,0.0011416321,0.00006087546,0.00009272304,0.000056951376,0.0014711379],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98158276,0.010623434,0.0011881097,0.0013023403,0.003842485,0.0014608525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91364145,0.06605236,0.00628833,0.002951976,0.008177917,0.002888027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020879788,0.0002359596,0.00066347944,0.015978266,0.007909659,0.017231898,0.001274211,0.0025124084,0.0029470874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0643481,0.00041309258,0.00040074592,0.02621444,0.016649488,0.013988478,0.0071714176,0.0029133318,0.00031736263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000917793,0.00017865725,0.052387543,0.002555115,0.00006936712,0.00051610864,0.514168,0.00019130956,0.00039487923,0.14801645,0.013975104,0.2674557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001486267,0.00013237266,0.08113454,0.010466258,0.000033576503,0.00059111504,0.6285937,0.00031662776,0.00032872809,0.031635717,0.24668528,0.00006728933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009929188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0193127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010347374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019286707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11042422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116123437","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01973.x","title":"A VERY PUBLIC SEARCH FOR PUBLIC VALUE: ‘RHETORICAL SECRETARIES' IN WESTMINSTER JURISDICTIONS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Bureaucracy; Public administration; Accountability; Public value; Value (mathematics); Political science; Corporate governance; Power (physics); Rhetoric; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.23706444557234416,"score_gpt":0.4044974523039545,"score_spread":0.16743300673161035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116123437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176126,0.0018625146,0.0011782777,0.015225631,0.00010390179,0.000025363637,0.000023373925,0.000035035253,0.063933335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964612,0.00021570183,0.000095372125,0.0005311784,0.000024866687,0.000004322377,0.000004484551,0.000011406165,0.0026514984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075294,0.004892028,0.00032393276,0.0006116198,0.0014342046,0.0019852403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97361076,0.017705336,0.0039024334,0.0009400301,0.0020865626,0.0017548763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010533931,0.00027125728,0.0005155848,0.0018927662,0.015121124,0.013112957,0.00092584087,0.0022014095,0.0029044459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019040573,0.00055742136,0.00015695751,0.0024375222,0.028728705,0.0059835087,0.006786984,0.004251227,0.00036129905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005770694,0.000019996349,0.004552223,0.00010713104,0.0000074277564,0.00064852624,0.9187872,0.000055636126,0.0009614752,0.05779217,0.003591811,0.01341863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023019453,0.000079673555,0.026586313,0.0003901256,0.00003343075,0.0004800456,0.80849105,0.00045029714,0.002470343,0.012847525,0.1480751,0.00007313858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10772356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15831758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10772356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016342979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091995895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2141931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117097811","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01837_2.x","title":"PROFESSIONALISM AND PUBLIC SERVICE: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF KENNETH KERNAGHAN - edited by David Siegel and Ken Rasmussen, SEARCHING FOR LEADERSHIP: SECRETARIES TO CABINET IN CANADA - edited by Patrice Dutil","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Cabinet (room); Citation; Public service; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Art; Political science; Law; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.0665960777211323,"score_gpt":0.34974933800908387,"score_spread":0.28315326028795157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117097811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063051167,0.37611452,0.00020365718,0.55134714,0.03925841,0.000021276479,0.00012805052,0.000013969275,0.03228247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06328779,0.5073639,0.00078806176,0.16014002,0.058702692,0.00014037422,0.00033349355,0.00025523087,0.20898838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371815,0.0025253792,0.00021043168,0.00047443857,0.0019253788,0.001146253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906933,0.0038434286,0.00027625402,0.00021996514,0.0031857367,0.0017813873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005491935,0.001862938,0.0016061562,0.0047043744,0.01657446,0.019969882,0.0030587646,0.011988833,0.006391936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01408257,0.00077146373,0.00067314913,0.01131807,0.024335489,0.010312528,0.006493377,0.01203856,0.002019431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009093419,0.000019563979,0.000077158176,0.00018587771,0.0000052969663,0.00003079308,0.0064089173,0.000046983936,0.000019643601,0.03526486,0.9483825,0.009549395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008299045,0.0000037102811,0.0005979593,0.00097128336,0.0000046076175,0.000023915349,0.011303845,0.000023002018,0.000024075283,0.012172641,0.974854,0.0000127703715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53889614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6961063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95008254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049917486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07880036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92763877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118170475","doi":"10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00410.x","title":"Governance Structures and Political Processes in a Public System: Lessons from Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Deliberation; Public administration; Politics; Political science; Mandate; Multi-level governance; Field (mathematics); Negotiation; Sociology; Organizational field; Public relations; Institutional theory; Economics; Law; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.04023555174953917,"score_gpt":0.33094994521278054,"score_spread":0.29071439346324135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118170475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262116,0.0042488403,0.0026060683,0.02148736,0.000071695795,0.00016345383,0.00078008074,0.000073806565,0.24435715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835782,0.00086035,0.0006705008,0.00043035985,0.000010030247,0.000018617911,0.00012232726,0.00001065261,0.014298895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987056,0.0004038055,0.00002534764,0.00010406605,0.00020659721,0.000554534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969254,0.0011828211,0.00023192671,0.00019884242,0.0010627046,0.00039819223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016809594,0.00017968554,0.00027611156,0.0010546618,0.005952762,0.004076984,0.0012029279,0.0010613934,0.0059208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004116271,0.00016848078,0.0002959004,0.0020792512,0.0046532787,0.0015907799,0.0010927734,0.0010952918,0.00023697552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002138074,0.00029782412,0.10805398,0.0003779048,0.00011211679,0.0027381051,0.083936125,0.01637215,0.0012593283,0.6555814,0.026352515,0.1047047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016921971,0.00019303449,0.41210693,0.000922918,0.00017386688,0.00036295937,0.10600652,0.03438049,0.0009619751,0.057912603,0.38663092,0.0001784981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99456847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99599326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1049688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1049688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049436044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7616055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122642665","doi":"10.1111/padm.12209","title":"INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; University of Toronto; European Commission; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Public sector; Variety (cybernetics); Corporate governance; Empirical research; Systematic review; Business; Economics; Political science; Management; Computer science; Economy","score_opus":0.4283953741007598,"score_gpt":0.5388943579545579,"score_spread":0.11049898385379808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122642665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043725665,0.9983296,0.00014283766,0.00063353305,0.00012477013,0.0000617214,0.00006499234,0.0000034739205,0.00020171021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046675694,0.9939703,0.0005713802,0.0004404534,0.000084997526,0.00012512751,0.000075404954,0.000002020011,0.000062865154],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.989358,0.0041573695,0.0032577321,0.0007315822,0.002072392,0.00042302586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334207,0.049813904,0.006701124,0.0010172592,0.008207429,0.0008395107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021172367,0.0011461999,0.0050244555,0.024620036,0.0009432839,0.0032575564,0.0015133201,0.0021062524,0.0028805549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056639247,0.00087091123,0.0035828738,0.024987102,0.001349257,0.004727173,0.0019198651,0.001630409,0.00035966738],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013037541,0.00006290633,0.0021325715,0.74619967,0.0023524736,0.00028984886,0.0010050745,0.0002624689,0.00034330908,0.0030025407,0.006504481,0.2377143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006440169,0.00019243505,0.005312089,0.86619496,0.0122140935,0.00068733474,0.0016560763,0.00017115331,0.00027399615,0.0021075672,0.11107695,0.00004881429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007976444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02564524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024620036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052282787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0349665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1119715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122993439","doi":"10.1111/padm.12060","title":"GOVERNMENT FUNDING, EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS, AND WORK ORGANIZATION IN NON‐PROFIT COMMUNITY SERVICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outsourcing; Recession; Business; Work (physics); Public sector; Vulnerability (computing); Government (linguistics); Competition (biology); Industrial relations; Labour economics; Private sector; Economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Management","score_opus":0.10253309456435386,"score_gpt":0.3923508044582871,"score_spread":0.2898177098939332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122993439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963008,0.00029815524,0.00001579844,0.00017384559,0.000003881408,0.000016400354,0.000049362385,9.451811e-7,0.0031406623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908614,0.00028317058,0.000026333493,0.000029573792,0.000005594653,0.000016102886,0.000040124687,0.0000013919075,0.0005114827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969387,0.0013674597,0.00010134631,0.00011828961,0.00046482385,0.0010093517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932482,0.002883617,0.0012671753,0.00026279312,0.0009029308,0.0014352795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002307189,0.00017314497,0.0005041427,0.003461525,0.003584367,0.0022448653,0.00063342083,0.00083610666,0.0057542743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008862873,0.00023287747,0.00030418148,0.0060119675,0.0020437595,0.0016379271,0.0028985762,0.00089853635,0.00025950142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009363167,0.0042544915,0.7135637,0.0005603512,0.00013388405,0.0018739599,0.16644531,0.0004298306,0.00054487,0.011316044,0.0026682504,0.097272985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040681112,0.0006055936,0.7724803,0.00027014263,0.00003495255,0.00052636716,0.2185535,0.00024151993,0.00008386192,0.0005744859,0.0065648262,0.000023639232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11515831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25686955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11515831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006353222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006588255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22897607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128493221","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02095.x","title":"RETHINKING E‐GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FROM A CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Information and Communications Technology; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Perception; Public relations; The Internet; E-Government; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Work (physics); Business; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.032468261757579754,"score_gpt":0.30772157697912955,"score_spread":0.2752533152215498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128493221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80964804,0.00041172202,0.04601215,0.0113284,0.00007829361,0.00022953862,0.0001347378,0.00014964823,0.13200748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490744,0.00011249697,0.004264676,0.00009915333,0.000008917572,0.000042595562,0.000030532683,0.000014196929,0.0005200954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97370696,0.01742751,0.0010844484,0.0009539948,0.0055063567,0.0013206588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682152,0.021370942,0.0029338254,0.00202025,0.004817743,0.00064194953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024900118,0.0007385947,0.00055468763,0.0040638377,0.0027049517,0.012625234,0.0011384789,0.001755714,0.0016998709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035855778,0.00024865268,0.0005028632,0.0047206874,0.008954684,0.012544105,0.0047448645,0.0022349365,0.00040315167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016282582,0.0007487409,0.12629868,0.00071086094,0.00012319357,0.0004208255,0.22129034,0.0072408877,0.004390373,0.37929425,0.0028300795,0.25648895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005194436,0.0007709399,0.13348168,0.0014783262,0.00018714643,0.000323184,0.5485514,0.0349401,0.0118979635,0.2075791,0.060546678,0.00019159509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006016916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007737617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024900118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063014943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063277856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13168603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138597664","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02002.x","title":"GOVERNING INFORMATION: A THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Value (mathematics); Political science; Positive economics; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Law; Management; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015259603426133115,"score_gpt":0.2750058883449407,"score_spread":0.2597462849188076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138597664","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0750509,0.0020968828,0.5724608,0.012039533,0.00027465037,0.0005388574,0.001691658,0.0003918776,0.33545482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768653,0.0015880758,0.21112528,0.00048861833,0.00015618156,0.0004288786,0.0010869349,0.00008480301,0.008175935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600357,0.0016241688,0.00032318986,0.00033643498,0.0014078077,0.00030481975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948284,0.0026162083,0.0007524659,0.0006623898,0.00087497226,0.00026551023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037544025,0.00038600786,0.00044716024,0.0060870545,0.0022931625,0.0143749295,0.0009923815,0.0013465598,0.0050776587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011218074,0.00030644023,0.0010828391,0.006852093,0.006553322,0.008603476,0.0040630116,0.001768995,0.00048590722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015137266,0.00002787836,0.002489843,0.00007026823,0.000016746992,0.0001303217,0.0018764376,0.0071887346,0.00025374405,0.96184266,0.0018692174,0.024219017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014247775,0.0000381067,0.005264799,0.00019307605,0.000044327604,0.00024873466,0.0058094785,0.06587023,0.0007636633,0.822627,0.09905711,0.0000692325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011162072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005474732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143749295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039309873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039425315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028521419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143720337","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01811.x","title":"DODGY KEBABS EVERYWHERE? VARIETY OF WORLDVIEWS AND REGULATORY CHANGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Variety (cybernetics); Newspaper; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0585633736557314,"score_gpt":0.3365104808808747,"score_spread":0.2779471072251433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143720337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8181836,0.0036129723,0.0038640178,0.059765838,0.00026727736,0.000015422964,0.000024268471,0.000021609025,0.11424498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.00029170394,0.0001269496,0.00068654463,0.000010315385,0.0000018335742,0.0000022326974,0.0000049567257,0.00063378835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461645,0.0039098603,0.00008669953,0.00032877366,0.00068146875,0.00037674067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947589,0.0029006584,0.00088696595,0.00039175624,0.00043137057,0.0006302388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077773375,0.00015497985,0.0002045149,0.0014338613,0.0037149962,0.008757446,0.0005174086,0.0017479041,0.00197584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009536384,0.00016350305,0.00015880738,0.00087048934,0.024089847,0.004683814,0.0027795937,0.0022823643,0.0002306903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012334989,0.000115283496,0.045331117,0.00011177006,0.00005532813,0.0008001872,0.44991976,0.00045912203,0.0011691991,0.42284626,0.0057701673,0.07329852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003074655,0.000078287514,0.0411803,0.0003695847,0.000033958306,0.0006039013,0.69475156,0.00095835247,0.00087797886,0.15963335,0.10138155,0.00010050686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071713394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007369923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008757446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037367851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015212897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04113096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144474058","doi":"10.1111/padm.12027","title":"STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN PHARMACEUTICAL REGULATION: CONNECTING TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND LAY KNOWLEDGE IN RISK MONITORING","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Technocracy; Stakeholder; Democracy; Process (computing); Ideal (ethics); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.5825368299380186,"score_gpt":0.5522875246403636,"score_spread":0.030249305297655016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144474058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5014982,0.0017353209,0.25112984,0.039240785,0.00012452746,0.0005713244,0.000065160886,0.000076083794,0.20555876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436957,0.00013630332,0.004396503,0.00035469315,0.000018544333,0.000060573246,0.0000075989306,0.0000055683367,0.00065078516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9205555,0.061136547,0.002140537,0.0028704691,0.009225643,0.004071333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84882224,0.12109812,0.014961134,0.0052037905,0.0064748446,0.003439774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05059881,0.0006721452,0.0007314996,0.003635111,0.005858292,0.010614631,0.0016282093,0.0054622064,0.004473928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07747342,0.00068100914,0.0010292346,0.0024540832,0.02238307,0.010125522,0.012552004,0.00414111,0.00039942111],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006760924,0.00097619387,0.065595284,0.0012289183,0.00022538874,0.0021477712,0.0635068,0.024356348,0.0053376253,0.7313731,0.0018990291,0.10267742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016793616,0.00060904433,0.031295355,0.0009922499,0.00012430116,0.0007273911,0.037409104,0.033840615,0.0063058822,0.86654234,0.021807916,0.00017785549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025349823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019375917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007825857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008820776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2675953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160531842","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02006.x","title":"NEW GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND FOREST POLICY: INSTITUTIONAL, POLITICAL AND REGULATORY DIMENSIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Complementarity (molecular biology); Politics; Climate change; Government (linguistics); Political science; Multi-level governance; Extant taxon; Modalities; Public administration; Environmental resource management; Economic system; Economics; Sociology; Ecology; Management; Social science","score_opus":0.06397024431788512,"score_gpt":0.2811851780160821,"score_spread":0.217214933698197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160531842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5791599,0.005824677,0.065036446,0.028157685,0.00032385945,0.00015887627,0.00007778663,0.0000609974,0.32119974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928832,0.0011506671,0.0030219627,0.00030754518,0.000052902524,0.000026750775,0.000019184323,0.000007907982,0.002529817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489695,0.0023095098,0.0002586215,0.0005838749,0.0011126727,0.00083824416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531144,0.0019875553,0.0009660905,0.0004419726,0.0007515143,0.0005414769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005470128,0.00013877367,0.0002898708,0.0019737931,0.0040796353,0.0114745395,0.0006809537,0.0010953863,0.0021759516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050907102,0.0002589145,0.00047080958,0.002494279,0.018220358,0.007819669,0.0046045273,0.0026858272,0.0001331897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030818363,0.000046718033,0.01638091,0.00009263792,0.000018283445,0.00027703747,0.01913201,0.0022416103,0.0016396835,0.9276914,0.0006322915,0.031816673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021599515,0.00013362094,0.09838574,0.0005697174,0.00005769057,0.00047499724,0.0893787,0.0052986764,0.0024954872,0.6314156,0.17165765,0.00011047667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063250666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011876343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114745395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085160285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057524387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06178838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164915570","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02001.x","title":"GOVERNANCE FROM THE BOTTOM UP: COMPLEXITY AND DIVERGENCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Corporate governance; Politics; European union; Perspective (graphical); Convergence (economics); Political science; Multi-level governance; Public administration; Regional science; Economic system; Economics; Sociology; Economic growth; International trade; Management; Law","score_opus":0.20516551908977465,"score_gpt":0.4375753109876892,"score_spread":0.23240979189791455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164915570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22320032,0.020520747,0.06896569,0.03657713,0.00039263125,0.0000803656,0.00019854953,0.00007574646,0.64998883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896431,0.003209152,0.0039893184,0.0006365023,0.00010451824,0.000051119012,0.000078106124,0.000027845721,0.0022602493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881175,0.008604268,0.00025463413,0.00072659884,0.0014471009,0.0008498561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348843,0.0045479937,0.00036323795,0.0007408832,0.0005617332,0.00029775684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008364322,0.00031054538,0.00077339413,0.0062498357,0.0033024885,0.011799452,0.0008749194,0.001323681,0.0037892144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010405182,0.00025152494,0.0004349343,0.005094752,0.021101423,0.011871231,0.0060248408,0.0022205145,0.00019801118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012791025,0.000005425464,0.0015193138,0.00006846226,0.000015164678,0.000057242683,0.02631353,0.0004197343,0.00011543111,0.9553702,0.00075919233,0.015343399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064269934,0.000037668135,0.0054467763,0.0004814516,0.000023639652,0.00012800566,0.052475087,0.0008613681,0.00022272652,0.8528326,0.087466605,0.000017659786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035887107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003934159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011799452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006829765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025071928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049553692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588716391","doi":"10.1111/padm.12290","title":"Temporary partisans, tagged officers or impartial professionals: Moving between ministerial offices and departments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Impartiality; Competence (human resources); Politics; Public administration; Public service; Public relations; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.15398509344067013,"score_gpt":0.4652385094898656,"score_spread":0.3112534160491955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588716391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433017,0.00024667205,0.0006908048,0.009284774,0.00008262455,0.000046785422,0.000022020302,0.000020802963,0.046303928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958289,0.00007046716,0.00017753479,0.00043367216,0.000012226512,0.000008569886,0.000008011753,0.0000068372015,0.003453677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932272,0.0027731282,0.00014936631,0.00049842504,0.0005558074,0.0027960844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911786,0.0021440235,0.0011601701,0.00043238883,0.00075209636,0.0043327482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051938994,0.00012664631,0.00028657963,0.0010224291,0.017479593,0.0077506024,0.0012462563,0.0015310132,0.008500481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014203498,0.00036645486,0.00020938,0.0010708709,0.01126259,0.0031249896,0.0057136714,0.002328097,0.00075379445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041203186,0.00030712623,0.1027245,0.00012766197,0.00001799851,0.0013191893,0.75367934,0.00027661363,0.0014781937,0.06618199,0.014504764,0.058970626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023542598,0.00009374504,0.087579824,0.00014006467,0.000013938754,0.00015497656,0.8577585,0.00028653638,0.00030688403,0.0043311156,0.049274046,0.000036722395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13599363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31468043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13599363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012313265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014916645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2704041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591549822","doi":"10.1111/padm.12303","title":"Partisan advisers and political policy failure avoidance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Elite; Work (physics); Public administration; Control (management); Political science; Public relations; Economics; Management; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03912756663661974,"score_gpt":0.37829340698582786,"score_spread":0.3391658403492081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591549822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642273,0.00038286095,0.0010634413,0.0024630905,0.000029924024,0.000022743381,0.000032092586,0.000027817185,0.031750716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989876,0.00010773481,0.00008595006,0.00008843155,0.000009148415,0.0000066149823,0.000009923023,0.0000050389062,0.0006995493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905489,0.005231257,0.00044660774,0.00058654527,0.0014334315,0.0017532528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91784626,0.043594714,0.019245133,0.003358544,0.0046541505,0.011301258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012171379,0.00019634471,0.00033462868,0.0026058299,0.0048425915,0.0039846916,0.00089506287,0.0013182196,0.0071740756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05462493,0.00027129013,0.0002228479,0.0022498157,0.005476139,0.0026172216,0.0041685933,0.0024117474,0.0004250641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019696541,0.00043334,0.6601758,0.00024126838,0.000116228985,0.000690971,0.2196968,0.0009734486,0.0008826177,0.028114948,0.0049030674,0.08357465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042872336,0.0001355815,0.69137675,0.0004231971,0.00004944996,0.0004504908,0.23788694,0.001620411,0.0004578578,0.015333903,0.0521274,0.0000952437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017779924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026278503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017779924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036124948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031053452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06436914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592078335","doi":"10.1111/padm.12322","title":"Combating terrorism by constraining charities? Charity and counter‐terrorism legislation before and after 9/11","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Terrorism; Legislature; Democracy; Normative; Political science; Law; Intersection (aeronautics); Public administration; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.029208191433742002,"score_gpt":0.32624109330636,"score_spread":0.297032901872618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592078335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9188925,0.00022093886,0.0010328615,0.004011701,0.0000446223,0.000052931046,0.00008407907,0.000012948939,0.07564743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971029,0.00008291798,0.00022679793,0.00028691444,0.000014768165,0.00003187436,0.00003597613,0.000007003511,0.0022109067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914807,0.003063638,0.00028306566,0.0007657451,0.0014246927,0.0029821603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877274,0.0032440037,0.0047477423,0.0010173429,0.0015840136,0.0016794292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00486038,0.00014445065,0.00032217838,0.001944321,0.0055142404,0.0076054735,0.0009119236,0.0017410129,0.005997924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016549576,0.00033582668,0.00040964867,0.002087254,0.011044955,0.004578313,0.0083006965,0.0030436865,0.000482312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040004082,0.0006606594,0.3393557,0.00034685785,0.00012455531,0.00075780664,0.19849457,0.0015143648,0.0021912225,0.3896841,0.0045096884,0.06196038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002743684,0.00032356786,0.6725295,0.0005996962,0.0000558277,0.00016772375,0.23285408,0.00074790575,0.0014271424,0.011556797,0.07963438,0.00007585697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04819133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0792546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04819133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012227485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009744254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09582168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789063311","doi":"10.1111/padm.12401","title":"A study of the operationalization of management controls in United Kingdom Private Finance Initiative contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Operationalization; Incentive; Negotiation; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Business; Management control system; Finance; Private sector; Public administration; Accounting; Public relations; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Management; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08145269741602383,"score_gpt":0.3078247887812682,"score_spread":0.22637209136524433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789063311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770842,0.0005146095,0.0024415457,0.0008128301,0.000010455718,0.00017397288,0.000041002488,0.000011960557,0.01890935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885166,0.00007509287,0.0004297357,0.00003835525,0.0000015976647,0.000059919912,0.000014221182,0.0000024465805,0.0005270685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9449453,0.03493904,0.0029872577,0.001951342,0.010391968,0.0047850925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75589645,0.16730656,0.04283404,0.011576,0.018512323,0.003874554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042881854,0.00023283131,0.00039011193,0.002151808,0.0047727623,0.007835456,0.0016187045,0.0020397876,0.0023138952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13337302,0.0006041281,0.0002391819,0.003559722,0.00718163,0.0056886845,0.005873204,0.0022260763,0.00015159599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005443269,0.0007741139,0.29495165,0.0007157937,0.0001338536,0.0017563157,0.35635474,0.0031003389,0.002443178,0.20859252,0.002417832,0.12821536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001221759,0.0009394373,0.6246703,0.0012686808,0.000083648556,0.0007523469,0.28140694,0.007414076,0.0022086992,0.010519259,0.07041939,0.00019507276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0770962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075228356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0770962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022158626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015210776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2267837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891183708","doi":"10.1111/padm.12548","title":"Encouraging civil servants to be frank and fearless: Merit recruitment and employee voice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Scrutiny; Bureaucracy; Civil servants; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Corporate governance; Employee voice; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.17809181411015215,"score_gpt":0.43085724639233397,"score_spread":0.25276543228218185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891183708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421313,0.0003577067,0.0012402004,0.01351091,0.00005439548,0.000025323354,0.000015243975,0.000014002727,0.042651005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797076,0.000056146928,0.000110131296,0.00062937976,0.000020508794,0.0000053276053,0.0000046896744,0.0000023501418,0.0012006849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991642,0.004621555,0.0002082059,0.00029936168,0.0019009885,0.0013279818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457355,0.026938232,0.01805311,0.0012084453,0.0032734913,0.0047910903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062969993,0.00015160828,0.00024432782,0.0005867299,0.003259858,0.0034382085,0.0004653499,0.0016700656,0.0061421017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035260964,0.00013165148,0.00032739353,0.0004902495,0.005479098,0.0013358766,0.0019566026,0.002311268,0.00056204415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005880645,0.0012703066,0.71986383,0.00023635812,0.00014349702,0.0010444454,0.10255946,0.00073859346,0.002333452,0.052614447,0.008172494,0.11043505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000621928,0.00030305798,0.8184998,0.00038632078,0.00009886351,0.00057904614,0.13686553,0.0023033887,0.001368072,0.020892931,0.018547378,0.00009339575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011188123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029816272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011188123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040408345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054453663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03330207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898187675","doi":"10.1111/padm.12567","title":"Adding rooms onto a house we love: Central banking after the global financial crisis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Financial crisis; Monetary policy; Inflation (cosmology); Order (exchange); Financial stability; Price of stability; Resilience (materials science); Financial system; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Central bank; Business; Monetary economics; Finance; Keynesian economics; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.026102180908742164,"score_gpt":0.26037084755782025,"score_spread":0.23426866664907808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898187675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91457707,0.0035246382,0.0013023334,0.048356924,0.00075515016,0.000030887124,0.000040931598,0.000047168713,0.031364854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393165,0.00061313115,0.00019214832,0.0021915552,0.000075135795,0.000011504824,0.000009154653,0.000024638648,0.0029511787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663854,0.002387572,0.0000503843,0.0001277921,0.00031411817,0.00048152724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466324,0.0028645284,0.0009573256,0.00025509502,0.0004777138,0.0007820024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039194133,0.00032470693,0.0003223394,0.00083356065,0.011767974,0.007003487,0.00060773554,0.001991828,0.0038391922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009010583,0.0003074598,0.00013348668,0.0014528994,0.014415602,0.0058685313,0.0048756306,0.0045409896,0.00038736293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056646437,0.000019865794,0.003226618,0.00007230032,0.0000055091296,0.0007910909,0.9560834,0.000048076075,0.0008129374,0.015693055,0.010992158,0.012198248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047317053,0.000024316547,0.0057160305,0.00016062916,0.000006505047,0.00029016397,0.93707234,0.000060995175,0.00032932384,0.0013097744,0.05500498,0.000020168241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008923272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018413628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011767974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004750479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032353282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03446728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972182074","doi":"10.1111/padm.12626","title":"How do professionals perceive the governance of public–private partnerships? Evidence from Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Rijkswaterstaat; Deltares; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public administration; Business; Political science; Public relations; Finance","score_opus":0.06391360935701565,"score_gpt":0.26760827739670806,"score_spread":0.2036946680396924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972182074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898261,0.00056008855,0.00008347404,0.00085765653,0.000012328049,0.000019387384,0.00009108977,0.0000010855849,0.008548892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840516,0.00046139455,0.00006750587,0.00014359999,0.0000017701276,0.000007844163,0.000071955146,0.0000016997747,0.0008390768],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319386,0.001770132,0.0003696696,0.00060831493,0.002289237,0.0017688478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97943956,0.008576667,0.002827206,0.00047415312,0.0057163495,0.0029660102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006246511,0.00021624366,0.0004995065,0.0017863996,0.0067099947,0.0064290925,0.00096083933,0.0012090466,0.0023390695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019937756,0.000379838,0.00025458276,0.0035070395,0.0043667504,0.0018312382,0.002941085,0.0010672773,0.00015567923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000235881,0.00021270664,0.4599123,0.0004034804,0.000050157014,0.00094758737,0.5039383,0.00040329786,0.00042981692,0.008776409,0.0033237983,0.021366214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021363727,0.000030499978,0.1871466,0.0004780486,0.0000241317,0.00010483752,0.80152243,0.0003169846,0.00015900789,0.0005564904,0.009597757,0.000041809322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96196413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03803587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035290483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041822106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25605154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980773956","doi":"10.1111/padm.12627","title":"Network relationships and standard adoption: Diffusion effects in transnational regulatory networks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Agency (philosophy); Business; Socialization; Memorandum of understanding; Industrial organization; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022235300695824092,"score_gpt":0.22944177850011135,"score_spread":0.20720647780428725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980773956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99021155,0.00028766037,0.004772639,0.00060816103,0.000008867698,0.000023694825,0.00021161024,0.000024045114,0.0038518626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991014,0.0000992748,0.00039081863,0.0000135495175,0.0000070574074,0.00000745339,0.00007212636,0.0000034766097,0.00030486638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790037,0.0011573428,0.00012146731,0.00045003838,0.00020710897,0.00016371672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437106,0.03618384,0.014635178,0.0020597607,0.0019144989,0.0014960289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004431364,0.00021390551,0.00032606875,0.0020943007,0.0006838979,0.0025729733,0.0005525437,0.00093150284,0.0055274004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03960833,0.00020021075,0.00041233975,0.0029237277,0.0016118553,0.004416887,0.0015770557,0.0012335347,0.00036596577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019648952,0.00020901446,0.9340025,0.00006685073,0.00023099898,0.00017591285,0.0040726257,0.01436621,0.0007098041,0.022607611,0.00077801617,0.022583941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005316298,0.00026696626,0.80671024,0.00012318586,0.00023569624,0.00041712506,0.006927038,0.14181018,0.00097323075,0.037408076,0.0049985787,0.00007654286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011065745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010900333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011065745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010567523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035445733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023435593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989399700","doi":"10.1111/padm.12630","title":"Left on the shelf: Explaining the failure of public inquiry recommendations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Politics; Order (exchange); Public administration; Policy learning; Political science; State (computer science); Public relations; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.10496229765760408,"score_gpt":0.35963580372021337,"score_spread":0.2546735060626093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989399700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7449557,0.00090386206,0.02900667,0.07111064,0.00029563115,0.0002600778,0.00026332124,0.00042549902,0.15277852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923375,0.00020206493,0.0020227383,0.0011170143,0.0000367816,0.00006021649,0.000038697468,0.00007257907,0.0041124844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9541105,0.0277449,0.0028070381,0.0026101295,0.008602144,0.004125284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76419187,0.17000937,0.02414801,0.018640278,0.019596567,0.0034139762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047851555,0.00038261074,0.00067254575,0.0029991288,0.006535738,0.01189108,0.00388403,0.0076686786,0.011387876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18571568,0.0009229242,0.00056262896,0.0028706628,0.021817904,0.015387736,0.011405665,0.0071518742,0.0025553093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039529958,0.00034347005,0.06751919,0.0005251049,0.00005530357,0.0019367676,0.4084929,0.0023027833,0.0013059537,0.43075114,0.015381788,0.07099036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018129307,0.00037742604,0.035495963,0.0018124512,0.000117956835,0.0006595859,0.49819297,0.01793708,0.0038271593,0.2512647,0.1898409,0.0002924527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03171285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018687546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047851555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011421655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008859628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25306618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995002059","doi":"10.1111/padm.12644","title":"The origins and effects of public servant confidence in whistleblowing protection regimes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Legitimacy; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Perception; Political science; Accounting; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Economics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.1463208082422131,"score_gpt":0.3843854457780407,"score_spread":0.23806463753582757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995002059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99621505,0.00007042319,0.00019658219,0.0005282911,0.0000021528504,0.000010061278,0.00006449245,0.0000040584496,0.0029089812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979,0.000017170232,0.000042840216,0.0000147654755,0.0000010985684,0.0000013847057,0.000016153033,9.255498e-7,0.00011569076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191767,0.002802462,0.00036498488,0.0006428486,0.0025539119,0.0017181626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8631789,0.06920199,0.036328666,0.006437305,0.013784037,0.01106908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075569726,0.00015535878,0.00028188838,0.0022253427,0.0019670508,0.0032830485,0.0011251211,0.0010394462,0.0033354103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071908206,0.00026553366,0.00028796768,0.0019660972,0.006862536,0.0009944632,0.0021645073,0.0018812383,0.00018038522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015546914,0.00015918529,0.9711141,0.000017683442,0.00003547791,0.0001421011,0.015209616,0.00028511122,0.00034941718,0.0020224894,0.00020955566,0.010299755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004275153,0.00004509392,0.9837451,0.00003553841,0.000011031913,0.000048458092,0.014286634,0.000497549,0.00017158025,0.00050485006,0.00063268235,0.00001714096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5594969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48846257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5594969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009599622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009086463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88619465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003112792","doi":"10.1111/padm.12654","title":"Burdens of transparency: An analysis of public sector internal auditing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Audit; Business; Public sector; Unintended consequences; Accounting; Internal audit; Public relations; Function (biology); Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.17707789923399458,"score_gpt":0.4094292100692392,"score_spread":0.23235131083524463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003112792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98035634,0.00015467651,0.00038026203,0.0016026885,0.0000060316797,0.00004579211,0.00017078093,0.000008225441,0.017275237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937576,0.000052730833,0.00008067413,0.000042085896,0.00000385664,0.0000059696695,0.00005433977,0.000002128807,0.00038250984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845508,0.0039764815,0.0005498483,0.00045455547,0.006947367,0.0035209775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7990034,0.10453075,0.057718534,0.0055072056,0.028046025,0.005193995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110986,0.00018029408,0.0003344128,0.0038321721,0.004850949,0.005067458,0.0009984333,0.0008270394,0.0027542517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08527663,0.00020226729,0.00041932418,0.0073446264,0.0042021764,0.0016543258,0.0021559433,0.001694192,0.00012548508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022972302,0.00015908945,0.8710769,0.00015730619,0.00006229058,0.000546936,0.05817282,0.00282367,0.0006178744,0.02929019,0.0038802214,0.032983094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011243087,0.000058353155,0.91476357,0.0001741635,0.000038103564,0.00013767893,0.06599116,0.005075829,0.00035182768,0.003656683,0.009698857,0.000042477935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6030019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.585963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6030019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0346946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025643269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7986722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023963495","doi":"10.1111/padm.12672","title":"Challenging the necessity of New Public Governance: Co‐production by third sector organizations under different models of public management","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Public sector; Corporate governance; General partnership; Hierarchy; Contingency; Government (linguistics); New public management; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy","score_opus":0.13036312521260948,"score_gpt":0.3536550681182538,"score_spread":0.22329194290564433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023963495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8770729,0.0005371589,0.007725936,0.014867432,0.000028160846,0.00010807847,0.00003855649,0.00003464081,0.099587314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990282,0.00004180844,0.00030478355,0.000114590475,0.00000342086,0.000013033478,0.000005285795,0.0000042063493,0.00048462412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97252256,0.019186424,0.00038201892,0.0015386262,0.0029649017,0.0034055081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572539,0.024858374,0.005667037,0.005983039,0.0030431487,0.003194571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020134075,0.00026598267,0.0004562028,0.001741384,0.0075064665,0.01510341,0.0016177061,0.0019887392,0.0036256278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02487223,0.00034110167,0.00041060406,0.0020408642,0.03130574,0.010312558,0.011438686,0.0023036979,0.00025029483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001714492,0.00023470435,0.09677597,0.00019467427,0.000059955462,0.0010698369,0.2637871,0.0019544302,0.0011348013,0.5847614,0.0024377664,0.047417935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000787164,0.000115552444,0.08546081,0.00042581532,0.000049246315,0.00029926669,0.66473377,0.005508986,0.0009853265,0.19529064,0.046987187,0.00006466833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0688879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092539564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0688879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024177976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019363869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17542434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095834832","doi":"10.1111/padm.12704","title":"A micro‐process model of institutional complexity in public hybrid organizations: Construal of identity threats and mitigation strategies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Hybridity; Public relations; Identity (music); Process (computing); Sociology; Organizational identity; Construal level theory; Work (physics); Resistance (ecology); Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Institutional theory; Business; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Organizational commitment; Social science","score_opus":0.07139996580677298,"score_gpt":0.27389570806637975,"score_spread":0.20249574225960676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095834832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6763787,0.00017634995,0.19740058,0.0039002735,0.000023783054,0.00036167153,0.00004506607,0.00017804878,0.121535555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930282,0.000020450745,0.0057207444,0.000024690127,0.0000024969934,0.000040254068,0.000007114195,0.000006823696,0.0011491594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339855,0.0039483393,0.00013527067,0.0005076718,0.001368149,0.00064204197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991808,0.0047356957,0.0011487417,0.0009707021,0.0007804272,0.0005563959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060923942,0.00042268555,0.00025444006,0.0024789176,0.003465083,0.008209134,0.0016711688,0.0015617403,0.0034970487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010279245,0.00036737567,0.0004952505,0.0011824308,0.021807086,0.0062586493,0.004175188,0.0013019533,0.0002829827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005514414,0.00012746637,0.014578033,0.000082640996,0.000026467053,0.00055197574,0.15059668,0.0059138183,0.0020411878,0.80761284,0.00029693145,0.018116811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006432402,0.0003022442,0.018333578,0.00023749318,0.00007605651,0.0006669543,0.2514607,0.08161032,0.002894218,0.61288345,0.031377263,0.000093343726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014087165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01064496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014087165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007938152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064491043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05759555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139472782","doi":"10.1111/padm.12736","title":"Assessing the stability of fiscal attitudes: Evidence from a survey experiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Revenue; Affect (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Government revenue; Public economics; Government spending; Survey data collection; Fiscal policy; Stability (learning theory); Macroeconomics; Psychology; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.31149413865692344,"score_gpt":0.48016780685906635,"score_spread":0.1686736682021429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139472782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978917,0.000014448204,0.00048138684,0.00006311829,0.0000047692392,0.00005046849,0.00011756578,0.0000054912775,0.0013711506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.000026969434,0.00068499305,0.00009764743,0.000008477379,0.0000988455,0.00019574807,0.0000036482804,0.00041883686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155164,0.0055954102,0.00049305835,0.00085893006,0.0012216098,0.00027934927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8878746,0.07059953,0.024921445,0.009020646,0.0056697833,0.0019140018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016123293,0.00023246619,0.0005252793,0.00058924867,0.0007623745,0.0016171973,0.00058282004,0.0008961235,0.0037837944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04249615,0.00029731006,0.00035623173,0.0009464659,0.0014359334,0.00094571273,0.0008749828,0.001082966,0.0007329216],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007384923,0.012927476,0.91468346,0.00023854943,0.0007714337,0.000099643454,0.0077821556,0.0012512538,0.013460466,0.0028790024,0.0011906783,0.03733089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003867978,0.0063639795,0.9774868,0.0000338576,0.00020474552,0.00005651025,0.0036895308,0.0037416345,0.0045309067,0.0015075315,0.0019321546,0.00006553828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002973398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034990234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016123293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006606965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006010383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08526915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192810220","doi":"10.1111/padm.12777","title":"Usability of transparency portals: Examination of perceptions of journalists as information seekers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Irish Research Council; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Credibility; Usability; Democracy; Perception; Politics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Corporate governance; Business; Open data; Political science; Computer science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.028370104371376083,"score_gpt":0.3231353179263385,"score_spread":0.2947652135549624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192810220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99572974,0.00017366113,0.0002830716,0.0004785148,0.000013110899,0.00004820841,0.00003670452,0.000010922165,0.003226107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987124,0.00017701524,0.00037493612,0.00021762826,0.00002161849,0.00004733139,0.000036275043,0.000008677023,0.00040412103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762456,0.016469477,0.001414667,0.000803064,0.0038094735,0.0012576173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82921875,0.1264539,0.022908805,0.003979735,0.010681377,0.00675744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022322435,0.00028082103,0.00065883616,0.002502762,0.0026702515,0.0070566717,0.0006490425,0.0015591051,0.0023613654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084977075,0.00047442853,0.00054532004,0.00146079,0.002718881,0.004039213,0.0036613734,0.0015097255,0.00044134317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041871695,0.00058114383,0.34618914,0.00054272654,0.00009732063,0.000667466,0.6229032,0.000113931244,0.0027310143,0.0009990059,0.001415508,0.023340719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007264823,0.00115522,0.22631986,0.00042115702,0.00008228058,0.00071021676,0.75762856,0.00090209494,0.0009029848,0.00059575494,0.0111035155,0.00010571355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035687825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026849676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022322435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011824955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018114514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118053734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205922673","doi":"10.1111/padm.12793","title":"What has become of the audit explosion? Analyzing trends in oversight activities in the Canadian government","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Accountability; Performance audit; Internal audit; Government (linguistics); Business; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Institution; Exploratory research; Joint audit; Public administration; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09572233357555879,"score_gpt":0.3651327426155417,"score_spread":0.2694104090399829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205922673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94184476,0.0067370064,0.00038888733,0.014513884,0.000101478196,0.000053286632,0.009568942,0.0000683432,0.026723422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914322,0.0031858229,0.00038455246,0.0004433903,0.000052388288,0.000012275395,0.002122845,0.000015580652,0.0023510181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931351,0.0004606374,0.00035859412,0.00048531362,0.0043868255,0.0011735393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9204631,0.0077942503,0.014642714,0.0016651812,0.05096871,0.0044659902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050808545,0.0002209636,0.00032466606,0.012417433,0.0023423266,0.005570094,0.0015577029,0.0007717005,0.001610457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029430954,0.0002567926,0.00028133448,0.027203964,0.001985233,0.0016819398,0.001195881,0.0011707073,0.00018118335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001406513,0.000049383136,0.9094166,0.00031819675,0.00006567557,0.00026595642,0.009129118,0.0006002709,0.0008509761,0.0062251613,0.012153088,0.060784996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024178573,0.000016522537,0.97053,0.00014717811,0.000017026336,0.000055578275,0.006698351,0.0004144769,0.00027479295,0.00012240912,0.021694215,0.000027041442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9237123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07628767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08391006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207280407","doi":"10.1111/padm.12791","title":"Why create government corporations? An examination of the determinants of corporatization in the Canadian public sector","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatization; Public sector; Popularity; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Public management; Ideology; New public management; State (computer science); Outsourcing; Public relations; Politics; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Economy; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.1115814883883347,"score_gpt":0.35654328357496184,"score_spread":0.24496179518662714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207280407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750294,0.0004720179,0.00022063985,0.0027236762,0.000011718076,0.00005054749,0.0009908995,0.000009237833,0.020491926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983918,0.00025489982,0.0000853845,0.00008409818,0.0000064529495,0.000008289616,0.0002964225,0.000004448322,0.00086826476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555016,0.00061323965,0.00017830658,0.00041225617,0.0019546454,0.0012914294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633854,0.008261075,0.013140492,0.0014189294,0.007948569,0.0058454676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033395502,0.00015167074,0.00031865964,0.003353973,0.0052234596,0.0043895035,0.0012185147,0.0005920906,0.0052124774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021934306,0.0002640885,0.00025456017,0.0061792675,0.0049631423,0.0012514729,0.0019842053,0.0014853729,0.0001815053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034637542,0.00007097462,0.96784794,0.000052561787,0.000034981356,0.00018230494,0.009459083,0.00030802874,0.00016760334,0.008883496,0.0037999672,0.009158454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049589694,0.000008163258,0.9700164,0.000091878275,0.000013950227,0.0000376515,0.020037903,0.0005815112,0.00010945374,0.00047580007,0.008608256,0.000014090003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9661292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04163003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04163003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053082053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30204844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224216051","doi":"10.1111/padm.12849","title":"Designing for adaptation: Static and dynamic robustness in policy‐making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Regional resilience and development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Indigenous Peoples' Health; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.06732327629877961,"score_gpt":0.2896131292671255,"score_spread":0.2222898529683459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224216051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09865309,0.0018222743,0.59390163,0.02863269,0.00026507463,0.0005205757,0.00015748467,0.0007474317,0.2752998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96608,0.0003198288,0.030335864,0.0006164691,0.000067201,0.00018915502,0.000038431008,0.00010369605,0.002249321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96888316,0.022302667,0.0013850689,0.0029940421,0.0021928237,0.0022421826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939219,0.041058216,0.00444084,0.010708952,0.0029867745,0.0015863442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03893585,0.0007356044,0.0008228567,0.0021209952,0.003111967,0.010621689,0.0022572298,0.0043661343,0.005870863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05968351,0.0006904858,0.0013453049,0.0017046008,0.021658313,0.010315244,0.007411579,0.0037247648,0.0006856086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059425227,0.000050178023,0.002012529,0.000105703504,0.000069292764,0.00025016666,0.0031481322,0.03426321,0.00062999193,0.936259,0.0012460554,0.021906339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002696105,0.000039104463,0.0011264528,0.00013771966,0.00002946818,0.00007371616,0.0012048016,0.015102685,0.0006337347,0.9660099,0.015569998,0.00004533628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00373752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019057292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03893585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007109537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057502543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20591491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224223747","doi":"10.1111/padm.12852","title":"Trust, but verify? Understanding citizen attitudes toward evidence‐informed policy making","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public trust; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public policy; Public opinion; Policy making; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.29849836095911864,"score_gpt":0.4703500000369211,"score_spread":0.1718516390778025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224223747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925162,0.00014411609,0.00077525567,0.002847066,0.000010262973,0.000006927554,0.000024913175,0.0000032191547,0.0036719874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997004,0.000052586434,0.00008860317,0.00009864443,0.000003945329,0.0000024187013,0.0000065983045,5.985244e-7,0.000046236095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883476,0.007865636,0.00068338023,0.00044421566,0.0018023638,0.0008567574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002369,0.05460539,0.03074302,0.004866309,0.0059910337,0.0035573929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01767806,0.00012417194,0.00030746212,0.0012870377,0.0010358434,0.0036639157,0.0003455344,0.0010009105,0.001581613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06803301,0.00026825894,0.00030590984,0.0011251608,0.0030975759,0.0027505097,0.0016746313,0.0015861243,0.00012522761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015420507,0.0001801745,0.9321241,0.00008520529,0.00013684279,0.00014494448,0.03579192,0.0002893966,0.0005324463,0.0048238817,0.00048481798,0.025252003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025601492,0.0002975119,0.89155585,0.00036437184,0.000114907,0.0002838586,0.0850825,0.003263756,0.00076328975,0.011411417,0.00677675,0.00006025483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005864371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061643072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01767806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014686958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019391286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09349167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255810709","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00330","title":"Annual report 2001","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Erasmus+; Queen's University; University of Sussex; Sheffield Hallam University; Griffith University; University of Bath; De Montfort University; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Ulster University; Teesside University; University of Greenwich; Oxford Brookes University; Universiteit Utrecht; Staffordshire University","keywords":"Section (typography); Annual report; Operations research; Library science; History; Political science; Geography; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Business; Accounting; Advertising","score_opus":0.05094261712775177,"score_gpt":0.32648108219380073,"score_spread":0.27553846506604895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255810709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018931043,0.0066745547,0.0014032084,0.012758562,0.018194743,0.0008070653,0.2270025,0.0013944976,0.72987175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005049999,0.0053535993,0.0013630193,0.0018632209,0.0016191042,0.00061317475,0.10450567,0.00042569198,0.87920654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837613,0.00015776885,0.0001351992,0.00017762773,0.00097143213,0.00018182409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951139,0.0003773969,0.00023507516,0.00030550102,0.0036560702,0.00031199268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019326425,0.00081577245,0.00050046155,0.0025849778,0.0007347024,0.0039398884,0.0017914028,0.0014876187,0.264761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064881584,0.0004116583,0.00032833533,0.003354639,0.0002291551,0.001605696,0.00085371936,0.0015397033,0.27849758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044284185,0.000024114674,0.000335488,0.000081565966,0.0000024866645,0.000015894742,0.000014567182,0.000029218716,0.000071741306,0.0012786418,0.9779447,0.020157218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007632468,0.000009156219,0.0015967847,0.00006654373,0.0000017034804,0.000017658485,0.000023466222,0.00001773526,0.0000563792,0.00015854141,0.9980411,0.0000034403965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016136505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013210553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022287746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005031149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8857138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286669373","doi":"10.1111/padm.12878","title":"The effect of institutional support and relational capital on knowledge mobilization in public administration research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Relational capital; Mobilization; Knowledge management; Dissemination; China; Public relations; Human capital; Administration (probate law); Capital (architecture); Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Intellectual capital; Geography","score_opus":0.06960033731624118,"score_gpt":0.3759858519864189,"score_spread":0.3063855146701777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286669373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910773,0.00011973874,0.0006429328,0.000653849,0.000008051749,0.000029177681,0.000022213559,0.000008956705,0.0074377945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981266,0.000024811015,0.00006634556,0.000010560279,0.0000033075294,0.0000054468587,0.000004053599,5.476248e-7,0.000072279305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890153,0.0070084836,0.0005604093,0.0006831572,0.0013216883,0.0014110894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222073,0.03946088,0.021378584,0.003869354,0.0029646026,0.01011933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007668359,0.0002275457,0.00023259457,0.0022645914,0.00229735,0.0034732083,0.0007488525,0.0005878491,0.004593325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040069528,0.00021069172,0.0002492463,0.0017406398,0.0031425222,0.00200068,0.0049680425,0.0006974154,0.00016766712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022890267,0.0007309484,0.9246698,0.00012819146,0.00017638854,0.00043843858,0.011087462,0.00062338164,0.00079402747,0.0066104596,0.0004934601,0.054018628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032183783,0.000256392,0.96632564,0.0001671649,0.000115070805,0.00018550539,0.02416255,0.0018932414,0.00056557363,0.003433341,0.0028352726,0.000028121622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029382522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004430199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007668359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025210404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003824847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040554643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327557202","doi":"10.1111/padm.12923","title":"A comparative study of governance changes on the perceptions of accountability in Fire and Rescue Services in England","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Perception; Public administration; Service (business); Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.05816901732751636,"score_gpt":0.3577885098254921,"score_spread":0.29961949249797576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327557202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984842,0.000050385268,0.000021215224,0.00033308522,0.000004439389,0.0000063472557,0.000013951378,4.3079172e-7,0.0010860092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967253,0.00004573273,0.000015799822,0.00004572021,0.0000023508424,0.0000062210656,0.0000069563343,6.039778e-7,0.00020403195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516726,0.002808082,0.00021548562,0.0002213624,0.0005179886,0.0010699074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887889,0.004387276,0.0032662721,0.00031207775,0.0015251352,0.0017203199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035696966,0.00015089424,0.00033930084,0.0012273764,0.0034816288,0.0024527877,0.0004477544,0.0005981991,0.004515203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012556195,0.00029752954,0.00022018461,0.0013151886,0.004101857,0.0022315322,0.0037395784,0.0015519572,0.00019340818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015116707,0.00021518988,0.14308125,0.00009367291,0.000018006995,0.0006928452,0.8458182,0.00007645302,0.00062291964,0.0018495095,0.0008263977,0.0065543335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005249573,0.00010925946,0.18543933,0.00008264477,0.000004502771,0.00006990651,0.811617,0.00006667003,0.000063772066,0.00011632462,0.002412265,0.000013072837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15062408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24526165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15062408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010579988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041948874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29949474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360614526","doi":"10.1111/padm.12924","title":"The design roots of policy problems: Unpacking the role of procedural tools in design fitness and resilience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Melbourne; Monash University","keywords":"Unpacking; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Conceptual framework; Management science; Computer science; Process management; Knowledge management; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07725667625659226,"score_gpt":0.35331180282692876,"score_spread":0.2760551265703365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360614526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19371703,0.0014816684,0.6620821,0.035841495,0.00019726758,0.0004987449,0.00007592298,0.00041405644,0.105691865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385742,0.00021523178,0.059191987,0.000483222,0.000024698611,0.00032169637,0.000016548105,0.00009675016,0.0010756587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90083945,0.080338076,0.0034745126,0.0045050792,0.007579948,0.0032629413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7400788,0.19799976,0.01736609,0.031913195,0.009189047,0.00345313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09546507,0.001388926,0.001410861,0.00666992,0.007624893,0.020799192,0.0039060996,0.0056170314,0.0061070826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16803762,0.0016133998,0.0012696686,0.004085529,0.09069046,0.027983671,0.015419535,0.007469405,0.0005909867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003717798,0.00006690102,0.004156109,0.00018878626,0.000039183862,0.00009533486,0.01578838,0.0056658946,0.00033505456,0.95194244,0.00036884416,0.021315867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033157943,0.00008206638,0.0015025156,0.0004253321,0.000040505067,0.00008480673,0.01140423,0.011232196,0.00070298,0.9630139,0.0114319,0.000046402853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034220878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031163117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09546507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016529797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017470628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5048736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387397682","doi":"10.1111/padm.12964","title":"Does increasing auditors' independence lead to more forceful public auditing? A study of a Canadian internal audit reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Audit; Accountability; Accounting; Auditor independence; Independence (probability theory); Internal audit; Business; Joint audit; Chief audit executive; Legislature; External auditor; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01946312852177811,"score_gpt":0.2509506810582495,"score_spread":0.2314875525364714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387397682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96780145,0.00054564164,0.00012204206,0.009644318,0.000035499972,0.00011463817,0.00016424777,0.000010750793,0.021561394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729556,0.00017415264,0.00009235691,0.00066380587,0.000012823068,0.00002229766,0.00004455657,0.00000516729,0.0016892247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98179996,0.0043087834,0.00041450604,0.0011195949,0.005757964,0.006599112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145587,0.02169318,0.019726317,0.0042551695,0.028942754,0.010823744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014469582,0.00029498665,0.00055992434,0.0024794813,0.014751556,0.0068909363,0.002023034,0.0018195551,0.0036444212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0664734,0.0004789919,0.00051817676,0.0064240294,0.009971413,0.0020236464,0.0029814795,0.0039912504,0.00024332377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010950805,0.0015114886,0.6157859,0.00035468463,0.0001636046,0.00084619777,0.21579371,0.001646969,0.0015503938,0.057798453,0.024051422,0.07940204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011660942,0.0001903013,0.8882184,0.00020889449,0.00008592551,0.000048619266,0.075484194,0.00078369176,0.00045926927,0.0009181406,0.033383437,0.00010265446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98981047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99110806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21628553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2013639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387767247","doi":"10.1111/padm.12966","title":"Losing control is not an option. Resource allocation to police oversight agencies in Western states","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines; Université de Lausanne","keywords":"Delegation; Accountability; Corporate governance; Agency (philosophy); Public administration; Politics; Business; Independence (probability theory); Empowerment; Discretion; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Norm (philosophy); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.09548369277241653,"score_gpt":0.39756569993226554,"score_spread":0.302082007159849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387767247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97376597,0.000102951046,0.0004703144,0.0021923014,0.0000110004785,0.000012617633,0.000013803746,0.0000039934407,0.023427103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.000033546945,0.00005431691,0.00011596263,0.000003454778,0.000004036996,0.0000044687604,0.0000012390096,0.00078184245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970806,0.0012962808,0.00015024169,0.0003610072,0.0005405455,0.00057127833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258465,0.0018719935,0.0030991167,0.00041191519,0.0010588466,0.00097346836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028457174,0.00010111855,0.00017677044,0.0008503534,0.0036724375,0.002367242,0.00041304276,0.000541262,0.0045660855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010233821,0.00022620239,0.0001284654,0.0010741415,0.008154139,0.0018390784,0.0022875324,0.0010093676,0.00022109172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002709142,0.00026103677,0.54752153,0.00019067922,0.00006392682,0.0005713783,0.28251114,0.0013083756,0.0028610707,0.075784236,0.004661939,0.08399375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014797897,0.00010341829,0.70073634,0.00019675998,0.000019053607,0.00016163918,0.25871447,0.0007336977,0.00049336604,0.008806536,0.029983383,0.00003657436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052341472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10621161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052341472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035068095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032511095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104073584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400058320","doi":"10.1111/padm.13013","title":"Influences on e‐governance in Africa: A study of economic, political, and infrastructural dynamics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ural Federal University","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Dynamics (music); Economic system; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Political economy; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.029805964930483438,"score_gpt":0.32374227828326907,"score_spread":0.29393631335278564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400058320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958324,0.00019645852,0.00006836863,0.00023956256,0.0000026916484,0.000008302286,0.00004783029,6.058072e-7,0.0036037927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.00014366962,0.000028472545,0.00001047918,0.0000028237864,0.0000028853276,0.000014579889,4.3323746e-7,0.00013074359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923074,0.00038463034,0.000030870226,0.00005302826,0.000068801775,0.00023193135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960814,0.0015738073,0.0015782824,0.00007866106,0.0002365457,0.00045126403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010584294,0.00015685533,0.00019936381,0.0012001998,0.0011082244,0.0012120088,0.00016229879,0.00022398308,0.0028444945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003906953,0.00015357234,0.00020057187,0.002150843,0.0011004908,0.0009796255,0.0011416167,0.0005221509,0.00011839353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004242106,0.00011634743,0.9759149,0.00005010048,0.00004605298,0.00048239046,0.00761861,0.0006007579,0.00028078174,0.005313537,0.00038346683,0.009150711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033173174,0.00003272071,0.9835776,0.00007255316,0.000018184915,0.000099908364,0.012672184,0.0005681814,0.00011061854,0.0004148023,0.0024242103,0.000005672823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012563321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018701058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012563321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012911962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011897846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024980366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406620528","doi":"10.22394/2070-8378-2023-25-6-46-52","title":"The importance of business network analysis. Illustrative example of Hindalco Industries Limited","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Industrial organization; Operations management; Economics","score_opus":0.06419027159383144,"score_gpt":0.2626632148511839,"score_spread":0.19847294325735243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406620528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33995387,0.0029466068,0.113037005,0.0154010095,0.00018088074,0.00024908368,0.0016098111,0.00025124996,0.52637047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95539993,0.0013187742,0.030674893,0.00029423976,0.00003971559,0.00007745021,0.00048336887,0.000037277616,0.011674337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945015,0.00034437643,0.000013124692,0.000051082312,0.00007573489,0.00006548861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980538,0.0012748705,0.00017036144,0.000109190514,0.00024455404,0.00014733378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006949867,0.00024968918,0.00016539915,0.0025741092,0.002392697,0.0019544947,0.00040452214,0.00087107683,0.0042579477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021763265,0.0001255775,0.00030293182,0.0034102777,0.0010253638,0.0026766786,0.0015254326,0.00063659216,0.00041647008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012997999,0.00009734263,0.02914385,0.00022014523,0.000044015444,0.0042791683,0.0058556553,0.023876678,0.0014407438,0.84969133,0.020027747,0.06519344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036210495,0.00007904786,0.04372396,0.00038982855,0.000088595625,0.002815288,0.027897272,0.2286563,0.0016179533,0.40900606,0.2856269,0.00006268019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018983679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024967594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018983679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017076244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000855535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03774637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410872393","doi":"10.1111/padm.13072","title":"Social Equity and Representative Bureaucracy: The Case of Nigeria's Federal Character Principle","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Character (mathematics); Social equality; Social character; Equity (law); Public administration; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0732996718142099,"score_gpt":0.4265975942703732,"score_spread":0.3532979224561633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410872393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362262,0.00022072125,0.00083353807,0.008642519,0.00004616454,0.000027357739,0.0000035827481,0.0000030103088,0.053996865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872404,0.000039252653,0.00007901189,0.00021680405,0.000006968476,0.0000050546073,7.4163233e-7,9.3142796e-7,0.0009270945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917846,0.0044719046,0.00019278955,0.00038319247,0.00066731405,0.0025002211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99104553,0.005151589,0.0014213524,0.0004950138,0.0006222984,0.0012642085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009896848,0.00016461466,0.00027477095,0.00090209465,0.022164213,0.006004808,0.0004728891,0.002410521,0.0021169651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007813582,0.00028155907,0.00020452232,0.0006760486,0.021718815,0.002407679,0.00400138,0.0033652384,0.00008366732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008354305,0.00019952927,0.04077288,0.00006123191,0.0000135896935,0.0033782288,0.300587,0.00040743852,0.00070480147,0.63846,0.0017534137,0.013578349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006782165,0.00015772587,0.08321635,0.0004987681,0.000039807986,0.0013012273,0.7513176,0.0022854768,0.00095143146,0.08078322,0.07931312,0.00006739881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034285128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06007321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034285128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010223611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008783001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07417786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413241160","doi":"10.1111/padm.70012","title":"Governance and Accountability in Reshaping Public Services: Open Challenges and Wicked Problems of the 21st Century","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Legitimacy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Transparency (behavior); Public service; Public administration; Equity (law); Public relations; Service delivery framework; Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Stakeholder; Service (business); Business; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Management; Law","score_opus":0.09309746600543775,"score_gpt":0.3822882083711681,"score_spread":0.2891907423657304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413241160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050277105,0.031734474,0.007878175,0.8943141,0.026107598,0.000028794964,0.000026987082,0.00008193821,0.034800235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5404209,0.10364742,0.009732278,0.1454371,0.1675269,0.000269745,0.00006016125,0.00036069428,0.03254473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845126,0.009995524,0.0006399069,0.0009887159,0.0025617988,0.0013014696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96006507,0.03332367,0.0014010695,0.0013994522,0.0026491208,0.0011616028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018122463,0.00052764686,0.0008400833,0.001974213,0.005972891,0.025355326,0.0016000217,0.0074305,0.0036181065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027162837,0.00033783013,0.0005588676,0.0023057568,0.038886376,0.019420074,0.0075565726,0.013099209,0.00055221125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013536651,0.000020541504,0.00018529009,0.00016662144,0.000009449275,0.00008423245,0.008146298,0.00041672107,0.000052301115,0.8792921,0.0858606,0.025752336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007831983,0.000020886202,0.00034417782,0.0006501601,0.000008033441,0.000057132198,0.006655275,0.000690639,0.000103608654,0.5745211,0.41691142,0.000029736142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002692435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032359816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025355326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007957175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067505348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095841885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116900316","doi":"10.1111/padm.70036","title":"Measuring Administrative Burden: Bringing the State “Back in” as a Reflexive Actor in Burden Reduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reflexivity; State (computer science); Conceptual framework; Performance measurement; Policy analysis","score_opus":0.1360740158523757,"score_gpt":0.43336555102970586,"score_spread":0.2972915351773302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116900316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35511768,0.016701631,0.27258673,0.181487,0.0014369864,0.0014152537,0.00068252743,0.00053839653,0.17003384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96007264,0.0029194704,0.033028457,0.002219082,0.00012884059,0.00046426847,0.000116304014,0.00007990447,0.000970999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8269399,0.14421183,0.0075708567,0.0038919856,0.014343133,0.0030422865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7022573,0.20009902,0.03576058,0.029309046,0.029240798,0.0033332678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12911306,0.0009304743,0.0013713432,0.012002995,0.006546285,0.021184599,0.00297429,0.003267052,0.0039401446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23851953,0.0010703782,0.0013772211,0.012558856,0.02971628,0.037332267,0.02058291,0.0056564477,0.00053497753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021270277,0.00023881996,0.05849603,0.0032279154,0.00033601405,0.0002061533,0.2235626,0.00375478,0.0011473742,0.4966263,0.008006466,0.2041848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007768293,0.00031081826,0.054283395,0.015997903,0.0007731981,0.00027327266,0.22401033,0.008033703,0.004528216,0.58769673,0.10366642,0.00034827495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012817413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013608714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12911306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013385273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02484985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6828233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}