{"meta":{"query_hash":"459e78ce178b","filters":{"venue":"Public Administration Review"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/459e78ce178b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Administration+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1531700853","doi":"10.1111/puar.12395","title":"Commentary: The Social Media Effects of a Few on the Perceptions of Many","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Police Service","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Social media; Perception; Citation; Library science; Computer science; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; World Wide Web; Medicine","score_opus":0.09505686276191197,"score_gpt":0.3946182371427736,"score_spread":0.2995613743808616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531700853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014445174,0.0020596194,0.000047087033,0.9485484,0.048207983,0.000010604464,0.00014077904,0.000015410022,0.0008257454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002386052,0.0014032401,0.00011480344,0.9383524,0.0549855,0.000060638442,0.000037533602,0.000029970493,0.002629796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857773,0.0051779705,0.0014000954,0.0021883722,0.0042727874,0.0011835368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86240584,0.101024866,0.006159892,0.0021148527,0.022242336,0.0060521434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015165807,0.0016008171,0.002558639,0.0025756229,0.0065900898,0.005316836,0.007807314,0.08169607,0.011580037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09767486,0.0013895737,0.0021437337,0.0036634246,0.0077540954,0.005948116,0.0038087144,0.059657104,0.008449034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042869004,0.000006326894,0.000049467064,0.00022727349,0.000025485811,0.000086869826,0.0002951486,0.000016173834,0.00006405018,0.0011887922,0.9962308,0.0017667133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001822863,0.000050386883,0.0011629749,0.002487233,0.00020366405,0.0002936168,0.0017221143,0.00016491047,0.000331808,0.0063304817,0.98697543,0.00009523409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03214019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036832064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08169607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008134317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018012974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08020538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976244645","doi":"10.1111/1540-6210.00334","title":"Integrating Values into Public Service: The Values Statement as Centerpiece","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":279,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Public service; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Mission statement; Service (business); Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Ethical values; Focus (optics); Problem statement; Political science; Sociology; Business; Management science; Marketing; Law; Computer science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.09653163788704938,"score_gpt":0.44770109962229093,"score_spread":0.35116946173524155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976244645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06068206,0.03608493,0.109208934,0.49801236,0.0040352345,0.00017969514,0.0000499052,0.00020235938,0.2915444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267685,0.015969612,0.021974998,0.015954351,0.0013929999,0.000115030496,0.000027679684,0.00012971456,0.01766706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97647494,0.01759747,0.0006047526,0.00046660544,0.0040790085,0.0007772246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696432,0.018473761,0.0031972993,0.0019534628,0.0051797163,0.0015525876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021153146,0.0003998724,0.00056928844,0.0016469416,0.0039423346,0.012590941,0.0009591193,0.0026192463,0.0017197587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026804786,0.00033860188,0.00031932595,0.002583331,0.028837876,0.015345286,0.0039323317,0.006501685,0.00039951445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001681382,0.000028092669,0.0011385737,0.00025785563,0.00001339077,0.00015131616,0.017048543,0.00033037676,0.0003720551,0.8833487,0.008909095,0.088385105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012427596,0.00009495009,0.0026541727,0.0017634806,0.000022535296,0.0002718816,0.048114885,0.00079622446,0.0011007389,0.57957876,0.36552998,0.000060014914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057733315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007976935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021153146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020266518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11186987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982037610","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x","title":"The Strategic Use of Information Technology by Nonprofit Organizations: Increasing Capacity and Untapped Potential","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Information Technology Governance and Strategy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Staffing; Strategic planning; Sustainability; Information technology; Strategic thinking; Strategic leadership; Scale (ratio); The Internet; Knowledge management; Marketing; Public relations; Process management; Management; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.018418753031306696,"score_gpt":0.23130297916166712,"score_spread":0.21288422613036043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982037610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709471,0.004036519,0.003122231,0.017113412,0.00005808927,0.00004638264,0.0000408418,0.000043948974,0.10459151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837047,0.0006771307,0.0002920406,0.00013635085,0.000009792042,0.000004552264,0.000008934158,0.000002004394,0.0004987331],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948309,0.0026195429,0.00014429343,0.00017181724,0.0011399391,0.0010935027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825716,0.008636015,0.0024622558,0.0010394232,0.002800056,0.0024906518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861056,0.00019013228,0.00016273704,0.002000344,0.0014961902,0.007760811,0.00067435985,0.0010084416,0.0015090909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017289413,0.00019280132,0.00023804005,0.002018254,0.0038444009,0.0065893657,0.0041815587,0.0007075284,0.0002695709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012368719,0.00046508387,0.31411695,0.0007457742,0.00018139093,0.001421743,0.032433763,0.0048006894,0.0031899712,0.14485927,0.0116561875,0.48600549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006277498,0.00065292465,0.3028724,0.0019800677,0.00019188737,0.0018413714,0.25720698,0.014472738,0.007022424,0.24569005,0.16780786,0.00019858903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045155184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010122674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007760811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029650596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008295587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02570802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995223996","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00578.x","title":"Toward a Postbureaucratic Model of Governance: How Institutional Commitment Is Challenging Quebec's Administration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Administration (probate law); Public administration; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Management; New public management; Public relations; Public sector; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.08528520784405114,"score_gpt":0.3391563372273364,"score_spread":0.25387112938328527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995223996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22755034,0.0104470635,0.01136006,0.38609037,0.00048239663,0.00019392827,0.00029335654,0.00007954096,0.36350304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802374,0.0012121081,0.0012467108,0.0049192454,0.00005847573,0.00004886669,0.000033932156,0.00001271066,0.012230662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918503,0.0043955785,0.00014172628,0.00044851747,0.0014796031,0.0016841195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98051286,0.0055745468,0.0012175575,0.0010533193,0.009399084,0.0022426601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011429368,0.0003124442,0.00039080577,0.0023364183,0.01301565,0.016961275,0.0027235432,0.0038506875,0.004932723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018215373,0.00025544543,0.00035366224,0.0039702896,0.013514357,0.005933859,0.0021965548,0.004150879,0.00025123253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023744678,0.000048687616,0.007256769,0.00007445203,0.000024746687,0.00014204805,0.007510111,0.0013558845,0.00014363985,0.9416199,0.020594079,0.021205962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012381417,0.00011135069,0.109437495,0.0010240889,0.00014364599,0.00018056462,0.07227263,0.014319255,0.00070255,0.4114919,0.39001146,0.00018118475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93927884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9690205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120615706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13473067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8751323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009276513","doi":"10.1111/puar.12353","title":"Conflict and Collaboration in Wildfire Management: The Role of Mission Alignment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Joint Fire Science Program; U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Land management; Work (physics); Business; Emergency management; State (computer science); Public administration; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Conflict management; Local government; Political science; Environmental planning; Land use; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.018029393910956704,"score_gpt":0.27895985444285654,"score_spread":0.26093046053189983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009276513","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039292043,0.9710951,0.000511887,0.0129095,0.00053298176,0.00004587031,0.000015748834,0.000004265826,0.010955486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16134538,0.8312818,0.0012717923,0.004352347,0.000493556,0.00014541356,0.00003363515,0.000009765943,0.0010663565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96463966,0.028909024,0.0016986368,0.00072313054,0.003104523,0.0009249457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391029,0.04424198,0.007284941,0.0006542524,0.007189879,0.0015260909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027465736,0.00033219138,0.0007759746,0.002569895,0.0018432918,0.0059956703,0.0012222036,0.0019770449,0.00262644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035563372,0.0003153028,0.0007300597,0.0030774479,0.0040524225,0.0040827575,0.0027811616,0.0029645183,0.00031622217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028112312,0.00024012895,0.0060354862,0.058209863,0.0008117534,0.00041819646,0.015985033,0.001302208,0.00043771372,0.0974139,0.042466488,0.7763981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014056612,0.00041503328,0.02506847,0.15288366,0.00086589245,0.0007042235,0.023531627,0.00042773073,0.0005397075,0.028000487,0.7673349,0.00008763112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010071448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022925595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027465736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071553187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0208767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14525443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026041722","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00093","title":"Less Government, More Secrecy: Reinvention and the Weakening of Freedom of Information Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of information; Secrecy; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Restructuring; Democracy; Business; Government (linguistics); Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.030109396186381893,"score_gpt":0.2985655148150158,"score_spread":0.26845611862863394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026041722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101244375,0.13034484,0.024073808,0.42147848,0.0011175887,0.00017037413,0.00006391583,0.0001474324,0.3213592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91872776,0.03155438,0.0038629705,0.031389084,0.0009579581,0.00008068066,0.000033960747,0.00004941396,0.0133438315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96996105,0.016200393,0.0012482898,0.0018023893,0.008015681,0.00277215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91182595,0.061698135,0.010608217,0.007629187,0.0065541733,0.0016843854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038793623,0.0003041223,0.00073077145,0.0031993599,0.0028134703,0.008737996,0.0018114625,0.0060119135,0.003290312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043770514,0.00037825675,0.0009174135,0.0031704744,0.046366688,0.012898525,0.0060204933,0.0069592106,0.00041480124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011273357,0.000021266385,0.0008362626,0.00014641503,0.000014875923,0.00010117171,0.002208145,0.00040326905,0.00018223868,0.96901053,0.0028124165,0.024252081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005290087,0.00009756803,0.005150357,0.0012881702,0.00003446901,0.0005210956,0.003451869,0.0006383732,0.0014819566,0.6659181,0.32130393,0.00006121948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008103118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073084007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038793623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012910996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20516276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043460714","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00113","title":"Loose Cannons and Rule Breakers, or Enterprising Leaders? Some Evidence About Innovative Public Managers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":316,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Foundation (evidence); Promotion (chess); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Entrepreneurship; Element (criminal law); Public sector; Accommodation; Political science; Law and economics; Sample (material); Business; Economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16373279414472358,"score_gpt":0.44491062745344906,"score_spread":0.2811778333087255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043460714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42110515,0.12616971,0.001984807,0.15968025,0.00063840044,0.00006849161,0.00031425626,0.000028563749,0.29001036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304267,0.04760151,0.0005594348,0.015567008,0.0006140177,0.00003497521,0.0001400939,0.00002250546,0.0050336677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915558,0.0036324325,0.0004639974,0.0015838472,0.0020015482,0.00076235976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8633862,0.10439543,0.021287791,0.003800803,0.004521393,0.002608288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016172647,0.00026794354,0.0004243135,0.003461038,0.0019639733,0.007941021,0.0014504989,0.0037264163,0.01360554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057631984,0.00040968246,0.00030129953,0.0044187224,0.010723729,0.007661774,0.0020215567,0.0026519394,0.0013326425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011760906,0.00053329277,0.18109137,0.006138484,0.0004381487,0.0012361534,0.08883899,0.00029692147,0.0006249209,0.24955137,0.02656477,0.44350952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043286083,0.0007082496,0.4401417,0.010463063,0.00049834925,0.0014794947,0.13413759,0.00032721763,0.000937256,0.08401126,0.32673684,0.00012623896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065378034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016172647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001590084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002040139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08553016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055398541","doi":"10.1111/1540-6210.00282","title":"Exploring Charismatic Leadership in the Public Sector: Measurement and Consequences","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charisma; Public sector; Charismatic authority; Unit (ring theory); Public relations; Leadership; Psychology; Leadership style; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.4940369086122135,"score_gpt":0.29675165218341604,"score_spread":0.19728525642879746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055398541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908257,0.000067020104,0.0000461537,0.00011638392,0.0000039783126,0.000017135306,0.000024268926,0.0000015151758,0.00064102147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996798,0.00005837667,0.00005153738,0.000030087816,0.0000053881554,0.000012048109,0.000034655048,5.509583e-7,0.0001276917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994093,0.0021546816,0.00024392083,0.00022561141,0.0019211713,0.0013616546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97447973,0.004448725,0.008428313,0.00080914027,0.0076005138,0.0042336686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009353964,0.0002033942,0.00028332122,0.0011974461,0.0021026134,0.0013352341,0.0004755512,0.00039446223,0.0006525201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017095195,0.00018715639,0.00020355657,0.0018425294,0.0017501776,0.00028271682,0.0010871305,0.0010447461,0.00012690815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005220219,0.00016376635,0.9869762,0.00002289191,0.000013013473,0.00004346127,0.0036454771,0.000034605167,0.00023559986,0.00008088519,0.00030336357,0.00842855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032019298,0.00007864444,0.9951912,0.00000779978,0.0000037590041,0.000020660491,0.00424614,0.000065043896,0.00007055877,0.000026586671,0.00028319034,0.0000032500147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21095759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37884995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21095759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005298594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008680034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41945934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055491537","doi":"10.1111/0033-3352.00039","title":"Defining and Defending the New Public Management","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public management; Public administration; Political science; New public management; Sociology; Management; Law; Public sector; Economics","score_opus":0.0942861300380078,"score_gpt":0.41461631611259475,"score_spread":0.32033018607458696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055491537","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014818463,0.28213206,0.0056635235,0.40665627,0.01112275,0.00004530356,0.000059036633,0.000073420015,0.29276583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19281253,0.345277,0.0098183965,0.112250455,0.027034655,0.0003148205,0.00020023396,0.0001697717,0.3121221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951668,0.0017301518,0.00018475167,0.0004366319,0.00209502,0.00038666296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398625,0.0029141482,0.0004979831,0.00031855304,0.0018699187,0.00041302884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006611922,0.0004299038,0.0004869757,0.0026133372,0.0027078965,0.015885506,0.0015607241,0.0052600913,0.0058198273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011058438,0.00039553165,0.00024465885,0.0025822339,0.020687077,0.012588054,0.0033863313,0.007178533,0.0020675666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032220942,0.000007221668,0.00007348084,0.00011170731,0.0000021264757,0.000019861704,0.0005719998,0.0001268559,0.000044047127,0.86118144,0.1107161,0.02714204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031165584,0.0000033915012,0.000220589,0.0005582963,0.000002209777,0.00002930212,0.0009911295,0.000083265826,0.000053581767,0.1570183,0.8410286,0.000008190938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010315079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018437188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015885506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011216698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019889278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08138323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061686928","doi":"10.1111/1540-6210.00279","title":"The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public relations; Adaptation (eye); Political science; Survey research; Multivariate analysis; Affect (linguistics); Public administration; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2589741858824874,"score_gpt":0.45809429554438985,"score_spread":0.19912010966190247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061686928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884212,0.0013501135,0.00050433585,0.002314164,0.000009776898,0.000035005338,0.00009704511,0.000016936423,0.00725147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802446,0.0009889274,0.00033566085,0.00011180092,0.000019544717,0.000018318866,0.00005444503,0.000007711048,0.00043913195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96524453,0.019897072,0.0027003482,0.001163485,0.007893392,0.003101183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78891164,0.11195691,0.045196507,0.013466791,0.027890109,0.012578062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014995304,0.00014801521,0.00041001767,0.0051119803,0.0020221178,0.004816952,0.00128756,0.0012202633,0.0023514826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08901765,0.00047995374,0.00051358115,0.008155635,0.0032918279,0.0027891067,0.0030823292,0.0015831761,0.00046559883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019355617,0.00048739207,0.87326616,0.0004762288,0.00017237142,0.00044496803,0.024761846,0.0007353644,0.0025871205,0.0065061506,0.0013067772,0.08906203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014266559,0.00023436903,0.9402005,0.0003704952,0.000055246863,0.0006710507,0.04333102,0.00079166045,0.00078214303,0.0012072002,0.012285807,0.00005620353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034845244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04506224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004823201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070178243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07930368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077191658","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00798.x","title":"Write the Rules and Win: Understanding Citizen Participation Game Dynamics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Control (management); Mechanism (biology); Citizen journalism; Public relations; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Dynamics (music); Audience participation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Epistemology; Management","score_opus":0.1449371114061826,"score_gpt":0.4143992792704793,"score_spread":0.2694621678642967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077191658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68489903,0.0006973042,0.19936478,0.0075341323,0.00006622485,0.0002576663,0.00014397936,0.00009582526,0.106941015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995763,0.00012753585,0.0076752068,0.00006942938,0.000011210474,0.00008533584,0.00002693611,0.000012039178,0.0020346418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964838,0.0023175357,0.00012314145,0.00030206062,0.0004732832,0.0003001808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175984,0.0058412543,0.0012190596,0.00046033858,0.00045553426,0.00026397986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005083062,0.00035402318,0.00050221174,0.001463565,0.0011300048,0.004360895,0.0012710334,0.0014639818,0.0034954406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021933427,0.00035042776,0.0004893867,0.0008464056,0.0047296216,0.0081063425,0.0018139483,0.0012105833,0.0003129859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115480485,0.00010429679,0.015212129,0.00011536877,0.000040996187,0.00028262558,0.018006999,0.020328566,0.00096542196,0.9228561,0.0009558357,0.021016086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047905338,0.00009811453,0.009788948,0.00008039791,0.000016634996,0.00015105377,0.019965015,0.16460167,0.00060045026,0.7899892,0.014620651,0.000040040002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00567901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004594533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00567901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002244717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016441264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026882172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137292110","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00758.x","title":"Brain Politics: Aspects of Administration in the Comparative Issue Definition of Autism‐Related Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autism; Politics; Political science; Public administration; Psychology; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.12281950958468722,"score_gpt":0.4675333411830571,"score_spread":0.3447138315983699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137292110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061465688,0.05283633,0.020466574,0.24293591,0.0015904156,0.00018094124,0.00006999477,0.00005091757,0.62040335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634274,0.0069925315,0.003236985,0.013391493,0.00059749087,0.00022686114,0.000023556788,0.00006282056,0.012040849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90392756,0.07788909,0.002231927,0.0023676506,0.00858063,0.005003042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91902155,0.06715628,0.0036987695,0.0020273423,0.0066866796,0.0014094712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064714886,0.00040580583,0.00096299715,0.0056750826,0.011221491,0.023290617,0.002404527,0.008806358,0.005284772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07775237,0.00059569394,0.00070229685,0.0061884806,0.044571884,0.019096527,0.0062614195,0.007567143,0.0005010277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074053532,0.000013183517,0.00043684072,0.00006263543,0.0000068702893,0.000058361882,0.0064955787,0.000116069896,0.000046882436,0.98657125,0.0017633053,0.004421718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004910014,0.000091486174,0.008052496,0.0013286715,0.00005550309,0.00030908553,0.052068006,0.0008817338,0.0008151291,0.5834192,0.35284013,0.00008949808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026868716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026793357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064714886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027953899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02835694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3422491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140552801","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02130.x","title":"Evaluating Local Government Emergency Management Programs: What Framework Should Public Managers Adopt?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Emergency management; Business; Key (lock); Local government; Quality (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Quality management; Process management; Operations management; Public administration; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.11988121789766383,"score_gpt":0.4222783695264721,"score_spread":0.30239715162880826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140552801","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19259603,0.298372,0.21823402,0.1968703,0.0017731359,0.03636401,0.0023911668,0.0011262222,0.05227309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57995355,0.067237325,0.33263266,0.0045883628,0.0003597606,0.013311106,0.00082668546,0.00007781816,0.00101271],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8283468,0.13215719,0.013316908,0.0026497666,0.021538854,0.0019906063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8648817,0.058588967,0.023376642,0.0029443644,0.047008716,0.0031996148],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22469595,0.0022103577,0.005749104,0.01348486,0.0025877282,0.012868696,0.0057602245,0.0031345615,0.00077127264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23655629,0.0010434098,0.001909874,0.011043017,0.0036703306,0.010254984,0.00482024,0.0032158345,0.00035035476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004944714,0.0010954605,0.050763816,0.03388557,0.0014136662,0.00026299577,0.015428712,0.010890424,0.0010116041,0.026193468,0.014934095,0.84362566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209397,0.009582381,0.22360702,0.23693399,0.008060994,0.0007112887,0.20916544,0.03511769,0.008883966,0.1132641,0.15127991,0.001299368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025166823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040247217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22469595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027041312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05931622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95608795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150244412","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00731.x","title":"The Changing Nature of Public Entrepreneurship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Public policy; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Economics; Political science; Management; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.03616394230351844,"score_gpt":0.2931729906709352,"score_spread":0.2570090483674168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150244412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49476552,0.011708585,0.030106919,0.054420352,0.00038417065,0.00007203183,0.00014160424,0.00012498249,0.40827584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512756,0.0017312061,0.00070718327,0.00032179954,0.00008774249,0.000015129886,0.000012567256,0.000009584436,0.0019871064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759907,0.0010983362,0.00006267905,0.0003484018,0.0004694424,0.0004221818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938705,0.003378972,0.000926279,0.0005976584,0.00068961957,0.00053691166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031784591,0.00010067444,0.0002507771,0.001771532,0.0019150678,0.006450397,0.00060923875,0.0010979709,0.0029186974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008793748,0.00021305874,0.00023401152,0.0017191431,0.008221944,0.006515798,0.002530247,0.0011678821,0.0003192946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026367217,0.000038471422,0.008234732,0.00008018148,0.000011863313,0.00033697148,0.007837803,0.0007878301,0.00024380052,0.9273512,0.002263486,0.052787356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014489122,0.000053520944,0.019612562,0.00023532132,0.000016007009,0.0005233324,0.022648737,0.0018551259,0.00039275558,0.76905274,0.18555799,0.000037498863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025293133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026392206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006450397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00368417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002895967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026730597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194549272","doi":"10.1111/puar.12504","title":"Recovering the Craft of Public Administration","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Bureaucracy; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Corporate governance; Stewardship (theology); Relevance (law); Political science; Public relations; Public sector; Sociology; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.2333159199067755,"score_gpt":0.44801034344722857,"score_spread":0.21469442354045307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194549272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042002276,0.15898389,0.010391066,0.38024643,0.0021772115,0.000107459404,0.00011725685,0.00028065994,0.40569368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79391277,0.12107862,0.004266893,0.030003117,0.0028588583,0.000092694914,0.000095513315,0.00009972692,0.04759176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98719305,0.006276132,0.00029080812,0.0006241685,0.0044859545,0.0011298804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538129,0.021904008,0.0033639222,0.005543394,0.012785238,0.0025905396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017320601,0.0002534225,0.00060142763,0.002772923,0.0018419096,0.006978346,0.0013014674,0.002463681,0.0063104937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034574013,0.0003181873,0.0002959238,0.0022238747,0.013706376,0.006758603,0.0044593783,0.0052930755,0.0017761237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003804335,0.00009659787,0.002086895,0.0013398344,0.000037120066,0.00014738043,0.0047423486,0.0006709078,0.0003563379,0.64040864,0.07081176,0.27926418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020381116,0.00008741904,0.0071712015,0.0034845343,0.000020589154,0.0002453002,0.004447247,0.00064546877,0.0007187843,0.12585355,0.8572773,0.000028334776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023172507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02482282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023172507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010229494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027649911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09160119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238813578","doi":"10.1111/puar.12494","title":"Managing for Legitimacy: Agency Governance in Its “Deep” Constitutional Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legitimacy; Bureaucracy; Public administration; Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Politics; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Social science","score_opus":0.11196824182056683,"score_gpt":0.42228239792344313,"score_spread":0.31031415610287627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238813578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23822838,0.006153022,0.06401295,0.08709674,0.00030245277,0.00014656797,0.00009672993,0.00010824057,0.6038549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960114,0.00031842946,0.0016240205,0.00058131013,0.00007059591,0.000028429446,0.000009302079,0.000006270412,0.0013502041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820978,0.012310918,0.00056348334,0.0013288623,0.0020294185,0.0016695459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800314,0.010878825,0.002455896,0.002819829,0.0024033836,0.0014106926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011913254,0.00019766258,0.00043242512,0.0021739232,0.002883423,0.011565304,0.0011328242,0.0027239616,0.003927695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018509889,0.00030038142,0.00033064568,0.0017720078,0.04182902,0.008596625,0.0047205663,0.0034857222,0.0002628536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039104907,0.000007979561,0.00059038313,0.000018086583,0.0000036709882,0.00002086706,0.00096838945,0.00028409,0.0001016814,0.9939619,0.00034370465,0.0036953797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002278932,0.000029552299,0.0047207647,0.0002373626,0.00001492163,0.00006823862,0.0026552582,0.0013807482,0.00023416408,0.95149785,0.03912189,0.000016361284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051276926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006100496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011913254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065290444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074943234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555400967","doi":"10.1111/puar.12685","title":"25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":480,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"National Research Foundation of Korea; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Corporate governance; Open government; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Public relations; Political science; Accounting; Business; Law","score_opus":0.1949989109640837,"score_gpt":0.43662193329282734,"score_spread":0.24162302232874364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555400967","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049163396,0.96242535,0.00035972035,0.025548212,0.0010375889,0.000026463336,0.00022268569,0.000011661565,0.0054519065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11832957,0.86778504,0.0012331376,0.009898801,0.0017593555,0.0000879234,0.00032352665,0.000024297982,0.00055831316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461806,0.030723995,0.0062125097,0.003570257,0.01062784,0.0026847129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5162176,0.3854652,0.046066727,0.010944277,0.035078127,0.0062280074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07569885,0.00062795845,0.002211824,0.01175296,0.0016933277,0.013144397,0.0023989163,0.0039599203,0.012037839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18108937,0.00092766015,0.0024901396,0.015796455,0.0080770105,0.015845405,0.006004503,0.0060454467,0.0010126415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012233964,0.00046100034,0.035245687,0.09696567,0.0021875347,0.0004675929,0.0078823315,0.0011676792,0.00032874302,0.13267478,0.042427413,0.678968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024639457,0.0004671903,0.071672104,0.34495252,0.0018965214,0.0008602997,0.01664813,0.000504154,0.00068553427,0.053070925,0.5087844,0.0002119212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011743825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010829906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92430115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012800964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03024622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4003386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563190176","doi":"10.1111/puar.12698","title":"Managing the Entanglement: Complexity Leadership in Public Sector Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Public sector; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Complex adaptive system; Complexity management; Balance (ability); Boundary (topology); Work (physics); Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Mathematics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.2358084797553983,"score_gpt":0.2778193107455184,"score_spread":0.042010830990120124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563190176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33706445,0.12283267,0.07911437,0.10731674,0.0011236798,0.00039287852,0.00004149319,0.00019619612,0.35191756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98815596,0.006716429,0.0021945536,0.0008682765,0.00018451146,0.000034401543,0.0000063166826,0.000012041656,0.0018275419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863499,0.009388342,0.00032647423,0.00047057503,0.0023602096,0.0011043795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832812,0.009292572,0.0031678542,0.00079701835,0.0021251887,0.0013361498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009954608,0.00019752883,0.00038991502,0.0018445206,0.0031225306,0.0075749895,0.0010011098,0.0013469676,0.0027588948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012884781,0.00024323586,0.000276308,0.0015577199,0.013433689,0.006347646,0.0047108266,0.0016028518,0.00031528148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068822745,0.00016850943,0.013914911,0.0021616227,0.0001243658,0.0008887549,0.04786302,0.0048712012,0.0017449143,0.6893726,0.012419875,0.22640131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070320224,0.00050592865,0.042985752,0.0036328025,0.00008459699,0.0011677252,0.08218304,0.0046172054,0.0016363179,0.42656708,0.43642515,0.00012406547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003703968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065850005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009954608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005682899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008841357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052645624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602400993","doi":"10.1111/puar.12737","title":"Examining the Evolution of the Field of Public Administration through a Bibliometric Analysis of <i>Public Administration Review</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Milestone; Bibliometrics; Administration (probate law); Politics; Field (mathematics); Political science; Centrality; Sociology; Public administration; Social science; Library science; History; Law","score_opus":0.1941251998639366,"score_gpt":0.4629531432263876,"score_spread":0.26882794336245097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602400993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8129541,0.054929063,0.00626156,0.015660185,0.00080635404,0.00044118875,0.0107944505,0.00027048658,0.097882524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97911674,0.012699429,0.0027894524,0.00039872475,0.00077965145,0.00019361434,0.001974518,0.00006971938,0.0019781596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744942,0.008073864,0.0033413572,0.0019262668,0.01126624,0.000898047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8131677,0.102838725,0.040686764,0.0063896966,0.034552444,0.0023646634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020795448,0.0002448899,0.0006585769,0.06713259,0.001735085,0.010219154,0.0007725713,0.0006203738,0.0021525607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106488295,0.00025320417,0.00044645602,0.1061174,0.0021749318,0.006290564,0.0030496293,0.0006679094,0.00051267166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019383446,0.00010080349,0.5581033,0.006158769,0.00071667135,0.0007113957,0.05355712,0.0010588822,0.0028428433,0.047445856,0.034636058,0.29447442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001108334,0.00006005687,0.83370227,0.0015456179,0.00018340441,0.00036657453,0.024417074,0.0012769517,0.0011728723,0.0036197016,0.1335885,0.000055882185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068933326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01070814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97920454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047920803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069907117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10997814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792879789","doi":"10.1111/puar.12924","title":"Body‐Worn Cameras and Policing: A List Experiment of Citizen Overt and True Support","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques","keywords":"Popularity; Discretion; Polling; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Accountability; Psychology; Public support; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07319675171110947,"score_gpt":0.42538812419623623,"score_spread":0.3521913724851268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792879789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99078876,0.00013617147,0.0015945556,0.00026428967,0.00012999063,0.004359801,0.00015743109,0.000029909452,0.0025391255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640932,0.00026125862,0.007961319,0.0005368297,0.00011939137,0.0224611,0.00019128952,0.000021489675,0.0043540304],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784933,0.015673622,0.0015223381,0.0015706489,0.0019542165,0.0007859448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9001065,0.08107575,0.00926114,0.0043059327,0.0038675396,0.0013831778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021231452,0.0007699354,0.0012434562,0.00057880185,0.0024894918,0.002174007,0.0013962853,0.00285929,0.010621188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044166125,0.0010311955,0.0012091876,0.0006091479,0.002185964,0.002532296,0.0014500328,0.0021444529,0.0014627324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14603125,0.5498106,0.042360052,0.008039101,0.0015990444,0.00055582455,0.04730058,0.0019307372,0.030738618,0.009990107,0.005556346,0.15608782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.044079874,0.80395824,0.09106156,0.0010699157,0.002241717,0.00015535748,0.015834337,0.006398036,0.013495357,0.0070048016,0.014324492,0.0003762551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013935653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002064907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021231452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001356451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020312741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112284005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943459228","doi":"10.1111/puar.13056","title":"From Research Evidence to “Evidence by Proxy”? Organizational Enactment of Evidence‐Based Health Care in Four High‐Income Countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Institutionalisation; Proxy (statistics); Health care; Evidence-based practice; Documentary evidence; Audit; Public relations; Business; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Accounting; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7198830068334424,"score_gpt":0.6886276008072244,"score_spread":0.03125540602621801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943459228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39270878,0.34994814,0.031191273,0.16292548,0.0012755704,0.0021837302,0.00028602703,0.00007168367,0.059409358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94562197,0.034621853,0.012312039,0.0058549284,0.000075636315,0.0010018173,0.000067901485,0.000019846844,0.00042399394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.37901405,0.56119907,0.028583845,0.0052653365,0.019949293,0.005988489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2684265,0.63344395,0.04535183,0.019629456,0.029918725,0.0032295685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.37922418,0.0006175752,0.0029950037,0.011760956,0.005189144,0.031537026,0.0046372833,0.005643942,0.001467734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4829299,0.0021693406,0.0013090427,0.021094352,0.029786203,0.019898402,0.019000044,0.006773994,0.00014705928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056283415,0.00034309668,0.04511868,0.047082182,0.0016908591,0.0013933295,0.33449912,0.0019853099,0.00083769165,0.30791873,0.0048740534,0.25369418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047448007,0.0007774907,0.035839092,0.19279738,0.0019356423,0.00084962486,0.5851515,0.0020516159,0.0028623228,0.05401781,0.1229872,0.00025580905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021111002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02273607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37922418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033681944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074660994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2960900077","doi":"10.1111/puar.13083","title":"What Gets Measured, Gets Done: Understanding and Addressing Middle‐Class Challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Thriving; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Public policy; Political science; Population; Tracking (education); Face (sociological concept); Benchmarking; Public administration; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Business; Computer science; Law; Social science; Pedagogy; Marketing","score_opus":0.2943855134202582,"score_gpt":0.37951065974276904,"score_spread":0.08512514632251084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960900077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016484633,0.42938522,0.0037672536,0.5134691,0.0030147196,0.0000571537,0.00008218352,0.000024102374,0.033715703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4603065,0.48008996,0.004898619,0.047175135,0.0029172583,0.00019110292,0.00008266668,0.00006112905,0.004277683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97047216,0.02133661,0.0011295178,0.0012959022,0.0040756925,0.0016900887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952321,0.03413079,0.0035297137,0.001602069,0.0060702986,0.0023460838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037581876,0.00044258244,0.0013058542,0.004205745,0.0042938595,0.014587334,0.0020261605,0.004560984,0.002226336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04994531,0.00039473947,0.0005115121,0.0045694527,0.018429432,0.017655972,0.00529107,0.0069656954,0.0003790189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043328302,0.00019315485,0.009513004,0.007011488,0.00016397827,0.00017500266,0.11306155,0.00054052146,0.00035816143,0.4599067,0.08323761,0.3257955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012003199,0.000105466745,0.012415084,0.023526814,0.00007843425,0.00011637645,0.13648067,0.0002656083,0.00037921802,0.19468348,0.63187766,0.000059199527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03414841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041365173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037581876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013844443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034229726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19875431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042411959","doi":"10.1111/puar.13278","title":"An Empirical Assessment of the Intrusiveness and Reasonableness of Emerging Work Surveillance Technologies in the Public Sector","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Public sector; Work (physics); Workforce; Public relations; Business; Phone; Corporate governance; Public service; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06600647886320607,"score_gpt":0.3590803965089071,"score_spread":0.293073917645701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042411959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955254,0.000076037715,0.00038610568,0.0002377567,0.0000050879025,0.000059838218,0.000041476123,0.0000030305262,0.0036652223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942505,0.000051168256,0.00021834817,0.00006324241,0.000005296505,0.000035040113,0.000027029891,0.0000016932943,0.00017312789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97296345,0.0141000105,0.0020435965,0.00117959,0.0083296355,0.0013836677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70213646,0.1727049,0.07570789,0.01469497,0.030495632,0.0042601447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028684072,0.00021383533,0.00026454564,0.0025949231,0.002174244,0.0046180007,0.0011704576,0.0009540666,0.0021359702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1301425,0.00042470483,0.0004844966,0.0015642911,0.0049657756,0.0031510794,0.0030257641,0.0021361297,0.00024521534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018782797,0.00064755214,0.90877515,0.0001834173,0.00008373081,0.00011899582,0.06909778,0.00019006705,0.00094028347,0.0012655244,0.0002918916,0.018217904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013482753,0.0005806646,0.8496022,0.00023732906,0.0000452337,0.00015222556,0.14435737,0.0009913715,0.0009286727,0.0004274437,0.002627949,0.000036015535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013097612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014650067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028684072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032007042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027809725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15169764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124699047","doi":"10.1111/1540-6210.00335","title":"In the Eye of the Storm? Societal Aging and the Future of Public‐Service Reform","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Retrenchment; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Vulnerability (computing); Public service; Public sector; Central government; Political science; Economic policy; Development economics; Economics; Public administration; Economy; Local government","score_opus":0.050028881097007226,"score_gpt":0.36721612213638827,"score_spread":0.31718724103938106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124699047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08444595,0.064490326,0.0008527723,0.78849053,0.0007824539,0.000013725017,0.00007449801,0.000024711017,0.060824998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92392325,0.04475737,0.00041378287,0.023081094,0.001144675,0.000017156899,0.000027560041,0.000010635156,0.0066244854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976018,0.0013888786,0.0000314568,0.00007038517,0.00020943048,0.000698037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966884,0.00096723234,0.00042857789,0.00017240783,0.001008148,0.000735243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004658759,0.00018582224,0.0002818838,0.00080619275,0.0026926335,0.0038461813,0.00034570904,0.0018377518,0.0038357344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007562923,0.00007904844,0.00025707774,0.0009863165,0.006004714,0.0058503267,0.0015817311,0.0015643418,0.00041592476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096688374,0.00013952501,0.015101438,0.00048492922,0.000050833543,0.00024839173,0.017134635,0.0009642469,0.00035162325,0.6652696,0.09671822,0.20343986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003634552,0.00014843143,0.029710516,0.0013143468,0.0000546331,0.00021519647,0.042250637,0.0006377284,0.0003823288,0.2882672,0.63694715,0.000035509234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031689122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049078323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031689122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006471183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01460737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182383288","doi":"10.1111/puar.13413","title":"A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government: A Public Value Perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Productivity; Business; Public value; Public economics; Quality (philosophy); Empirical research; Service (business); Public relations; Public service; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.13012369561087858,"score_gpt":0.4621052371177076,"score_spread":0.331981541506829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182383288","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019326434,0.9948549,0.00035109694,0.0010656798,0.000175238,0.00021108087,0.0004257636,0.000008908924,0.00097459694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018067988,0.979933,0.0008263269,0.0005299705,0.00007297927,0.0002734725,0.00019195523,0.000005078627,0.00009925275],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811204,0.0077007613,0.0053130947,0.0010598059,0.0043330374,0.00047289632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.887349,0.089172415,0.011288704,0.0012531807,0.010155087,0.00078167056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022783013,0.0013247064,0.004476314,0.025284568,0.0007976803,0.00405021,0.0016880641,0.0019415711,0.0046562683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0907359,0.001015151,0.00465967,0.026706954,0.0019461669,0.0036809652,0.0020946176,0.0015483113,0.00048761556],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086585,0.000041016345,0.0023151706,0.86913395,0.004204287,0.00019441651,0.000521587,0.0002614312,0.00024660342,0.0018856917,0.003725361,0.11736192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004941764,0.00011590723,0.005058981,0.95021194,0.013809048,0.00023493801,0.0009154928,0.0000822819,0.00019672459,0.00089750136,0.028402632,0.000025154966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066859312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01988471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025284568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005677841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12048954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183029569","doi":"10.1111/puar.13416","title":"How Can Servant Leaders Foster Public Employees’ Service‐Oriented Behaviors? A Multilevel Multisource Study in Canadian Libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Servant leadership; Public relations; Service-orientation; Sample (material); Context (archaeology); Service (business); Public service; Leadership style; Multilevel model; Business; Servant; Linkage (software); Psychology; Sociology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10199635041021136,"score_gpt":0.3075938112420342,"score_spread":0.20559746083182284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183029569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985752,0.000104771585,0.000039697243,0.00023109895,0.0000046577206,0.000024681274,0.00009406598,0.0000023189946,0.0009235525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894124,0.00010935621,0.00008588814,0.000078949444,0.0000031508212,0.000018605124,0.000084453335,0.000002848512,0.00067570654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701214,0.0005477665,0.00007427685,0.0002983044,0.00070590334,0.0013615736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412054,0.0008882021,0.0010215975,0.00027010572,0.0020106877,0.0016888002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037231355,0.00039763364,0.0007940438,0.0020910415,0.009832329,0.003415688,0.0016232915,0.00070367096,0.0028394433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008055855,0.0004231655,0.00061491865,0.003626369,0.0017833445,0.0010913481,0.0021979036,0.0013751521,0.0002753752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135845,0.00039224062,0.92574674,0.000056633697,0.000053588625,0.00017895579,0.058209784,0.00008515633,0.00026794517,0.00062748324,0.0014573798,0.01278815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010279741,0.00008982741,0.89873356,0.000093187205,0.000042225103,0.000026629617,0.09838609,0.00025002583,0.000106786276,0.00009998205,0.0021366698,0.000024768353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99265176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039378908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039378908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059924588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28571534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326327605","doi":"","title":"Public Administration Theory Network Conference Articles","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Administration (probate law); Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Media studies; Relevance (law); Library science; Sociology; Public administration; History; Law","score_opus":0.23839804185906646,"score_gpt":0.40203374467509867,"score_spread":0.1636357028160322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W326327605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005838205,0.0058026416,0.00083724986,0.05173623,0.07141653,0.0003631349,0.0066940524,0.0010078418,0.8615585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005054485,0.0051086843,0.00077461015,0.010726096,0.022983665,0.0006343776,0.006144688,0.0008789646,0.9476944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491113,0.0008079391,0.00025329395,0.00066222635,0.0027995447,0.0005658388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900821,0.0020293242,0.0005625197,0.0008531984,0.003214672,0.0032581815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004667129,0.0013283045,0.00075802364,0.0060061486,0.005409075,0.01501154,0.0027853427,0.0053709582,0.53555155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015652565,0.00053511193,0.0008314715,0.0076352083,0.001097747,0.0065498496,0.004711046,0.004720952,0.32740197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075892876,0.000014920392,0.00001566384,0.000062780244,0.0000010353061,0.000019197812,0.000021147807,0.000017964572,0.0000230222,0.0019410648,0.9909837,0.0068917875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004287849,0.000003972551,0.0001035156,0.00006464023,6.9529835e-7,0.000013230286,0.000058193775,0.000025070232,0.000021626942,0.00052336854,0.9991781,0.0000032840985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030509906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064453143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53555155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071359714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077782506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66247934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210973526","doi":"10.1111/puar.13485","title":"Compassion, Bureaucrat Bashing, and Public Administration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Compassion; Test (biology); Aggression; Public sector; Social psychology; Psychology; Sample (material); Field (mathematics); Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.07929482952903776,"score_gpt":0.3801630970885519,"score_spread":0.3008682675595141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210973526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6972896,0.22345552,0.000866435,0.010881987,0.0002383303,0.00007028066,0.000059685568,0.000012683358,0.06712543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92409307,0.07236627,0.00031402754,0.0011972263,0.00012446585,0.000025621615,0.000020083766,0.000003511643,0.0018558097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971089,0.0019235214,0.00009107256,0.00012941379,0.0005497231,0.0001973895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820451,0.011179768,0.0049639824,0.00030978973,0.00088450446,0.0006169065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039960737,0.00018591013,0.0003307166,0.0009178,0.00067942514,0.0016529465,0.0004949954,0.0008754519,0.0045378804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009741853,0.00017988197,0.00028315544,0.0011430194,0.0031091636,0.0006227004,0.0007617093,0.0008695323,0.00020069355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066542043,0.0028861053,0.23490833,0.011387254,0.000957818,0.00045562224,0.011925915,0.00091890176,0.0022355393,0.08463544,0.008773482,0.6402501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013566524,0.0008038471,0.9024526,0.00714106,0.00047511453,0.00080799276,0.013176504,0.00059001317,0.0010451578,0.017484732,0.055817652,0.000069645335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058842422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013637912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058842422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001992556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026004221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021133542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213120588","doi":"10.1111/puar.13478","title":"Structural Advocacy Organizations and Intersectional Outcomes: Effects of Women's Police Stations on Female Homicides","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Universidade de São Paulo; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Fundação Getulio Vargas","keywords":"Mandate; Race (biology); Intersectionality; Metropolitan area; Representation (politics); Criminology; Population; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Geography; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.023576860293287406,"score_gpt":0.34700289383534216,"score_spread":0.32342603354205474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213120588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6878605,0.28812212,0.00049781153,0.0052110115,0.0003701189,0.00018848426,0.00044519483,0.000009330384,0.01729536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92478913,0.07341368,0.00039580712,0.0002987864,0.00011740134,0.0001034159,0.00008405969,0.0000034604836,0.00079415494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932287,0.004994681,0.0002753485,0.00031888418,0.0007729066,0.0004094285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827854,0.009567205,0.004600769,0.00028530814,0.0020426451,0.0007186964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004663529,0.0003169547,0.0005981549,0.0012931493,0.0006781284,0.0011051944,0.0008264789,0.0007897565,0.0049631163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022199893,0.00017500813,0.0012163942,0.0016570757,0.00084518385,0.0006233553,0.0010427361,0.0008104827,0.0002459302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016318319,0.0016938958,0.6320739,0.017898256,0.0066232486,0.0003862292,0.004629182,0.00086261326,0.0004253808,0.009678058,0.0038320508,0.32026544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016794585,0.0024235426,0.9388425,0.01680718,0.005934642,0.0003213841,0.010858644,0.00042272446,0.00054250145,0.0016864161,0.021956094,0.000036397887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01728585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03753878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01728585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013474013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004142007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034370482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221062269","doi":"10.1111/puar.13492","title":"Bureaucratic Representation, Accountability, and Democracy: A Qualitative Study of Indigenous Bureaucrats in Australia and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Accountability; Indigenous; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.14498039943786006,"score_gpt":0.4940228537454857,"score_spread":0.34904245430762565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221062269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99323785,0.0003831077,0.00043360397,0.00153471,0.000031295363,0.000119521115,0.000054339824,0.000007584914,0.004197969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962339,0.00035501047,0.00034277196,0.00045840035,0.000008420425,0.00007896159,0.00002985106,0.000018106051,0.002474543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850426,0.0074192556,0.000381869,0.0008611523,0.0023464805,0.0039486424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799218,0.00968001,0.0014513695,0.00042894896,0.004079873,0.0044380086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01344677,0.0006451999,0.0013188677,0.0036847286,0.03722632,0.007181031,0.0033693833,0.002015908,0.0029219505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018188959,0.00084581267,0.00038971027,0.004487752,0.02249415,0.0030906438,0.0064522824,0.004372822,0.00021818797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008378254,0.00002018685,0.0023967724,0.000031265947,0.0000015637654,0.00025370755,0.9956475,0.000017658422,0.00018914131,0.00053894654,0.00015796884,0.00073703384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.549369e-7,0.000011423002,0.0020748437,0.000054288714,0.0000018124457,0.00003600842,0.99532795,0.000059999074,0.000050099847,0.00006858542,0.0023046948,0.000009261893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92929024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.958318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070709765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06759479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08556732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4904368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280502764","doi":"10.1111/puar.13518","title":"Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Brock University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Centrum för naturkatastrofslära, Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Interdependence; Salient; Collective action; Collaborative governance; Disaster response; Computer science; Emergency management; Knowledge management; Corporate governance; Collaborative network; Action (physics); Public relations; Process management; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.0654747369558845,"score_gpt":0.40938243191517587,"score_spread":0.34390769495929135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280502764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36266553,0.21163619,0.090885736,0.087336704,0.0027427757,0.0015038655,0.00017187733,0.00023744,0.24281988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053962,0.058525182,0.026109498,0.002531511,0.00032070803,0.0004058075,0.000056182373,0.000029412215,0.0066256523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871939,0.010760998,0.00023942787,0.0003837276,0.00089141383,0.00053046044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899805,0.0060745757,0.0013619275,0.00034005937,0.0013413263,0.00090162765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012843679,0.00040759565,0.0003919633,0.001359509,0.0024352204,0.0032812466,0.0014513583,0.0015219817,0.0027714954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01436378,0.00019857536,0.00048989564,0.001352758,0.002671457,0.0031189097,0.0037546859,0.0012669705,0.00039015154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033640632,0.00056102674,0.012082019,0.012938352,0.00050500326,0.0007072897,0.0582173,0.0039329776,0.0031444393,0.085438766,0.029997908,0.7921384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003368668,0.0012492817,0.02955149,0.01441683,0.00096265064,0.0013263855,0.15349498,0.0069869515,0.00518818,0.0979767,0.68835384,0.00015587149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006154403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018412715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012843679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002689062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008697445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06792468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380052654","doi":"10.1111/puar.13682","title":"Achieving social equity: From problems to solutions By M. E.Guy &amp; S. A.McCandless (Eds.), Irvine, CA: Melvin &amp; Leigh. 2020. pp. 194 $44.95 (paperback)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nickel Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; State (computer science); Equity (law); Library science; Art history; Art; Law; Computer science; Political science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.16208280469498632,"score_gpt":0.44787100181516803,"score_spread":0.2857881971201817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380052654","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055953624,0.98034567,0.00010849697,0.014932283,0.0017008336,0.000009171852,0.0000267408,0.000011919509,0.0028090584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015274119,0.98369586,0.0003299551,0.0031985957,0.0013896471,0.000023600074,0.000060597373,0.000016156133,0.009758218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986137,0.00049604615,0.00009608326,0.00013354162,0.00052940834,0.0001312157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998198,0.0008122364,0.00017654635,0.00004105857,0.00048360208,0.00028862222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002680704,0.0018185473,0.0012849701,0.0019908831,0.0010175646,0.0038158586,0.0013049763,0.0026339141,0.017158316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003267867,0.0008882293,0.0005630946,0.0031245677,0.0021648493,0.0049968027,0.0027633524,0.0050986013,0.009125374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025411118,0.00002817743,0.00013293691,0.0016311929,0.000017919923,0.000026147241,0.00023097394,0.000092216294,0.000062995234,0.003499652,0.7974996,0.19675277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016124539,0.00003750641,0.0011845905,0.0052218502,0.000027655757,0.00016589244,0.00055148074,0.00007928749,0.000071777155,0.0049067424,0.9877159,0.000021117708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019937992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041169044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019937992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003479411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006175573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057400346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387186668","doi":"10.1111/puar.13738","title":"Politics, Policy and Public Administration: Essays in Honour of Professor John Wanna. By AndrewPodger, MichaeldePercy, and SamVincent, eds. 2021. Acton, Australia. Australian National University Press. 420 pp. $70.00 (paper). <scp>ISBN</scp> (print) 9781760464363. Available for free download at https://press.anu.edu.au/publications/series/anzsog/politics-policy-and-public-administration-theory-and-practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Politics; Administration (probate law); Download; Library science; Political science; Citation; Public policy; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08111348058580672,"score_gpt":0.3815892642891226,"score_spread":0.30047578370331585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387186668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000702609,0.71981007,0.00052904524,0.2257505,0.015582296,0.000035251538,0.0000919377,0.000034748165,0.03746357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02994305,0.60446584,0.001328132,0.053442974,0.022934217,0.0003161246,0.00018088952,0.00017605399,0.28721276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976802,0.0010306932,0.00011030049,0.00028310617,0.0006277026,0.0002680242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997044,0.0015924026,0.00019517633,0.00010060854,0.0006115829,0.00045618968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539431,0.0016467487,0.0015225129,0.0018981827,0.004859624,0.008603704,0.0014903182,0.0042902427,0.008503203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008915908,0.0011538331,0.00079165265,0.0035041312,0.0070171067,0.009426653,0.003752607,0.0069376724,0.0059403796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016134878,0.000045118406,0.0001228016,0.0003662279,0.000008696107,0.000059251564,0.0031325312,0.00008274498,0.0000637873,0.020036941,0.94674903,0.029316798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006079477,0.0000057159677,0.00052867515,0.0010555952,0.000004532349,0.000042232827,0.0018972249,0.000035617675,0.000028213975,0.007786875,0.988602,0.00000730374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027625354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043134835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027625354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128658675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09334886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387344296","doi":"10.1111/puar.13741","title":"Nature or nurture? Agency life‐cycles as a function of institutional legacy, political environment, and organizational hardwiring","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Nature versus nurture; Politics; Ideology; Agency (philosophy); Function (biology); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Biology; Law; Social science; Genetics","score_opus":0.06736084466350688,"score_gpt":0.3926101794203208,"score_spread":0.3252493347568139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387344296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97841007,0.0020189427,0.0031398938,0.00249522,0.000010931248,0.00002641539,0.00008157429,0.000012941031,0.013803971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912435,0.00025903448,0.00028758383,0.000033210174,0.0000077370805,0.000006005874,0.000014836924,0.0000022053282,0.0002650203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798715,0.0010876311,0.00007651219,0.00032358745,0.00023948934,0.00028559324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97754616,0.009796528,0.00700506,0.0021147025,0.0013513247,0.0021862846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005440846,0.000101746096,0.00028946815,0.0012488764,0.00078797416,0.00277397,0.000899458,0.00076540565,0.004264975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016850024,0.00021822313,0.0002796569,0.0011592645,0.0034249984,0.0038456682,0.0014692463,0.0006507294,0.00024931855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044293972,0.0005046114,0.6805963,0.00024944663,0.00018464545,0.00026960592,0.009587617,0.005331907,0.0014785272,0.16060992,0.0012800096,0.1394644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037145204,0.00026138968,0.896273,0.00014111651,0.00006968872,0.0002842233,0.011817901,0.0051767724,0.0006590365,0.074383624,0.010852569,0.00004351383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002241912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032358817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005440846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013763352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010735053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028774261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399295922","doi":"10.1111/puar.13847","title":"Corporatisation in local government: Context, evidence and perspectives from 19 countries. By MariekeVan Genugten, BartVoorn, RhysAndrews, UlfPapenfuß, HaraldTorsteinsen, Cham: Springer. 2023. pp. 497. €119.99 (hardcover). ISBN: 978‐3‐031‐09981‐6","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07159777906093992,"score_gpt":0.3584000333438224,"score_spread":0.28680225428288253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399295922","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11307167,0.7057481,0.0009128342,0.051690213,0.0012666536,0.00011745714,0.0007634773,0.000043195563,0.12638639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5956755,0.37560943,0.0008714218,0.004629832,0.00056247687,0.00022971357,0.000700513,0.00009200467,0.021629084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427456,0.0037961295,0.0002770555,0.00036020554,0.00079153036,0.0005005329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107367,0.0069691706,0.0009209426,0.00016890494,0.00047391624,0.000393431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847873,0.0006422502,0.0010263177,0.0032998617,0.005680238,0.010919433,0.0014978276,0.002553368,0.0069082016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009014817,0.0010578113,0.000512398,0.017743211,0.011630943,0.010078691,0.006270152,0.0037166306,0.00078823883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112355505,0.00018275889,0.010415851,0.0064292774,0.00009443703,0.0026475345,0.5617099,0.0005511984,0.00017629722,0.1272395,0.15540789,0.13503301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001957782,0.000045615052,0.022625124,0.011554931,0.000037882335,0.00054612843,0.45635816,0.00010688113,0.00014812127,0.0074384543,0.50108093,0.000038217262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024084825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04284305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024084825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011008648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081685865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399615946","doi":"10.1111/puar.13849","title":"The government analytics handbook: Leveraging data to strengthen public administration. By DanielRogger, ChristianSchuster (Eds.), Washington, DC: World Bank. 2023. pp. 760. ISBN (paper): 978‐1‐4648‐1957‐5; ISBN (electronic): 978‐1‐4648‐1981‐0","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Government (linguistics); Digital government; Analytics; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Business; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06916149960887856,"score_gpt":0.3198334119372918,"score_spread":0.25067191232841324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399615946","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009549782,0.62251574,0.011611239,0.0782764,0.015738744,0.00033179228,0.009692565,0.0027042215,0.2581743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005062257,0.64964455,0.022278268,0.00819007,0.003449617,0.000554562,0.011760193,0.0017931246,0.29726732],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743265,0.000554427,0.00023993151,0.00028552796,0.0013104271,0.00017703643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965507,0.0017925656,0.00029577292,0.0002151053,0.0008171826,0.000328648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028054134,0.0018759159,0.0014206911,0.0048398394,0.0015079977,0.012364274,0.0015465211,0.0025311522,0.055299442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006451632,0.0017684014,0.00081170036,0.013140259,0.0017161784,0.0124431895,0.0033637371,0.0053074253,0.048525758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053094695,0.000013138857,0.00007606396,0.0003338332,0.000005955591,0.000019173525,0.00017564146,0.00014099896,0.000052926625,0.0070010684,0.8962612,0.09591464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002270208,0.00000355484,0.0002667688,0.0007985167,0.0000026485059,0.00004199174,0.00021918099,0.00006249154,0.000037361802,0.004709039,0.9938466,0.000009522477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012259993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133332005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055299442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042240433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011978246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18499506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405016977","doi":"10.1111/puar.13915","title":"The Adaptable Country: How Canada Can Survive the Twenty‐First Century. By AlasdairRoberts, Montreal: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2024. pp. 192. $24.95 <scp>CAD</scp> (paperback). <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9780228022008","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.01349205326542166,"score_gpt":0.22086008404955082,"score_spread":0.20736803078412916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405016977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00597214,0.26424894,0.001175938,0.16619563,0.006827329,0.0000862868,0.002204227,0.00048121586,0.55280834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049150202,0.09054451,0.0014788894,0.009675555,0.0002773506,0.000037806058,0.00086375343,0.00032036402,0.84765154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894947,0.000054117576,0.000018095665,0.000086419204,0.0005035476,0.00038834408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937975,0.00003869972,0.000023096321,0.0000208134,0.00023792476,0.00029973596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006798478,0.0009009797,0.00043397702,0.0014428309,0.010352268,0.014157849,0.0016451839,0.0021745202,0.046074793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013388685,0.0005242562,0.00042528374,0.00407116,0.0048615932,0.004448789,0.00305802,0.0035366004,0.008306868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013639154,0.000013177214,0.0007725073,0.00018811326,0.0000074438067,0.00017673493,0.004143707,0.00016147087,0.000117259115,0.04302292,0.85443074,0.09695229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.272333e-7,0.0000012476551,0.0010366502,0.00012198149,0.00000211999,0.000025113843,0.0022620219,0.000023924704,0.000015720323,0.0010600442,0.9954417,0.000008562951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98584783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0703305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0703305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13969688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51028585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411967001","doi":"10.1111/puar.70001","title":"Are Citizens Responsive to the Regulatory State? The Effect of Regulation on Evaluations of Early Childhood Education and Care ( <scp>ECEC</scp> )","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Regulatory state; Early childhood education; Child care; Public economics; Political science; Business; Public administration; Psychology; Economics; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0174793173893929,"score_gpt":0.34806533497147857,"score_spread":0.33058601758208567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411967001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724559,0.002687191,0.00072213623,0.006372617,0.00008231603,0.000046541874,0.00050177815,0.000011761189,0.01711963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.0006621162,0.00018038548,0.00058061123,0.000026024914,0.000029770574,0.00010612885,0.000006814471,0.00049037556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96908396,0.022347715,0.0013192686,0.0016685803,0.004547344,0.0010330507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8122807,0.120408535,0.04600948,0.004706161,0.014538869,0.0020562804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022826927,0.00008614125,0.0003472091,0.001101787,0.00075765274,0.0034368641,0.00041061165,0.0007260159,0.0022761696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13563727,0.00017107575,0.00036132283,0.0016985195,0.0016232436,0.0016904379,0.0011862958,0.0011646188,0.00022212855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046264674,0.00014885014,0.8639322,0.00078906654,0.000419883,0.00018326002,0.033983063,0.00054270914,0.0006493412,0.007520237,0.006606994,0.08476173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019031635,0.00016109964,0.9589977,0.0007123356,0.00017567568,0.000074861084,0.021556819,0.0007502587,0.00055953383,0.0012792769,0.015670547,0.00004286277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020060739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034707863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022826927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023108437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020992307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12072176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414553589","doi":"10.1111/puar.70045","title":"Brazil's Public Administration and the Challenge of New Democracies: Promoting Social Inclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Microsemi (Canada)","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Legislature; Devolution (biology); Decentralization; Accountability; Autonomy; Corporate governance; Democratization; Democracy","score_opus":0.03545199528530921,"score_gpt":0.3564058774194521,"score_spread":0.3209538821341429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414553589","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06132663,0.4233149,0.0018468678,0.34735334,0.001005108,0.0000901251,0.00008165071,0.000045145247,0.1649362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87601113,0.10791927,0.001029396,0.010128593,0.00065422343,0.00005306899,0.000026493748,0.000011369224,0.0041665016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951048,0.003273664,0.00014529534,0.00017837269,0.00074911444,0.0005487788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353164,0.0032338868,0.0010572735,0.00028245832,0.0012670051,0.00062771444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086042695,0.00020588096,0.0004294571,0.0017693639,0.0019187562,0.0043177805,0.00058967737,0.0015534748,0.0019703375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008767821,0.0001163255,0.00031887266,0.0018270739,0.0070709665,0.0023270692,0.0034495757,0.0017807889,0.0001334984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021491756,0.000074952244,0.0037872002,0.0036168853,0.000046445974,0.00027010808,0.010396363,0.0007496865,0.00077350484,0.83068305,0.016282711,0.13329753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029023546,0.00010137413,0.015010515,0.009800185,0.00006299627,0.00027654937,0.01214519,0.0004354323,0.00069384417,0.067384586,0.8940352,0.00002496159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029628592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059623834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029628592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009090413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02989575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06595582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415689606","doi":"10.1111/puar.70050","title":"Entrepreneurial Leadership, Well‐Being, and Inclusion in Public Sector Organizations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Ural Federal University","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Promotion (chess); Entrepreneurship; Public sector; Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Organizational performance","score_opus":0.03589557709530332,"score_gpt":0.2691199563148658,"score_spread":0.23322437921956246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415689606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8485784,0.13371445,0.00025114,0.0037475661,0.00013027008,0.00003377195,0.00010298276,0.0000062252902,0.013435116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753828,0.024022361,0.00009700153,0.00010719371,0.000042790165,0.000007502252,0.000024322577,7.594063e-7,0.00031536733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.0005455298,0.000067002366,0.00005161947,0.00021647489,0.00009541191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526125,0.0015054581,0.002204232,0.000067110515,0.0004690548,0.00049301644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020805865,0.000081335296,0.00022614849,0.0010514851,0.00035063544,0.00097011,0.0001698792,0.00021666693,0.0015406184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051990515,0.00007312977,0.00021810601,0.0012332639,0.00040685167,0.00036678812,0.00060799246,0.00037822555,0.00007504133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001183198,0.0005227606,0.788522,0.0027605263,0.00028819338,0.00025716115,0.0031741993,0.0002333476,0.00027623223,0.0021370393,0.002028456,0.19968177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045271963,0.00010022824,0.9885908,0.0012263948,0.000075271724,0.00016306907,0.0030226344,0.000068036454,0.000067100824,0.00035260027,0.006323195,0.0000061268847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048602186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120309675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048602186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043666043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011741332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011003315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417066149","doi":"10.1111/puar.70058","title":"Rhetoric Versus Reality? A Comparative Study of Public and Non‐Public Sector Employees' Perceptions of Discrimination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Rhetoric; Exploratory research; Public sector; Empirical research; Equity (law); Set (abstract data type); Human resource management; Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.3277436845023624,"score_gpt":0.43317123487501286,"score_spread":0.10542755037265045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417066149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801096,0.003731638,0.00013263446,0.0024126905,0.000069742506,0.000011865981,0.000013207385,0.0000017977011,0.013516851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746525,0.0014753512,0.00003287011,0.00033924665,0.00002991291,0.0000094692,0.000006094733,0.0000025199754,0.00063926796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804086,0.008315299,0.00036156987,0.0003012065,0.0020883225,0.0008927017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749587,0.017194007,0.0048005595,0.0004155176,0.0016054478,0.0010258412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014159427,0.00017779802,0.0005630074,0.00196964,0.002590675,0.00516014,0.0006362282,0.0010284857,0.003730311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023493191,0.0001999349,0.00020531286,0.0019993961,0.0055363774,0.003611333,0.002909257,0.001453804,0.0002506796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000880774,0.00021918774,0.031420164,0.00045770218,0.000029128394,0.00029366388,0.9314441,0.000019938218,0.000430334,0.009719708,0.0013473587,0.024530703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005162879,0.000080999285,0.030664798,0.00047693873,0.000012377476,0.00011625218,0.9587684,0.000029291128,0.00008951493,0.0005887664,0.009156068,0.000011366023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003710474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060308743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014159427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021833999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002753211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0748831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}