{"meta":{"query_hash":"6607e1d6fce4","filters":{"venue":"Public Finance Review"},"cohort_total":39,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"exported":39,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6607e1d6fce4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Finance+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1970747503","doi":"10.1177/109114210102900603","title":"Specific Inputs, Value-Added, and Production Linkages in Tax-Incidence Theory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Production (economics); Economics; Tax incidence; Factors of production; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Process (computing); Production theory; Macroeconomics; Public economics; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Computer science","score_opus":0.04887788198380479,"score_gpt":0.23795960821921747,"score_spread":0.18908172623541267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970747503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13680539,0.0101161115,0.7040243,0.005632752,0.00052347686,0.00015871876,0.0013889049,0.00030240987,0.14104794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91866595,0.010836711,0.035081156,0.00024120849,0.00035112686,0.0002538918,0.0004917939,0.00010516064,0.033973057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994147,0.00022896053,0.000033510496,0.00010369288,0.00012450446,0.000094753595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988625,0.0006644178,0.00017955259,0.00013266386,0.00009929434,0.00006161211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215807,0.0013333453,0.000984279,0.0023763324,0.0011681063,0.003686026,0.0015792736,0.0017150138,0.010947257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032515563,0.0007030865,0.0014176401,0.0043810178,0.0036248202,0.0056342767,0.0019044363,0.0024466526,0.0010477788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009608914,0.000022322907,0.00067205034,0.000034271037,0.000009672759,0.00007200057,0.000053861582,0.08582887,0.00007512759,0.90785456,0.0006621939,0.0047055967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000823686,0.000015137601,0.0003136633,0.00003066576,0.000013142885,0.000048186444,0.00005773105,0.062209208,0.000103273924,0.9327826,0.00440343,0.0000147693345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076318528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049981615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010947257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034278217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014502903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036622226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971272404","doi":"10.1177/109114210203000505","title":"Public Provision of Indivisible Private Goods in Short Supply","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Government (linguistics); Private good; Economics; Public economics; Government expenditure; Labour economics; Business; Public finance; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07942749459356237,"score_gpt":0.30421043115342516,"score_spread":0.2247829365598628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971272404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18875612,0.03853209,0.1435311,0.028917663,0.00042414918,0.00018893224,0.0011009527,0.0002465723,0.59830236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93171793,0.013534782,0.0069983476,0.00078865513,0.00031946975,0.00010764951,0.00020964889,0.00003256457,0.04629092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.0006186429,0.00007166873,0.00018630506,0.00038714163,0.0002826897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970613,0.0012433259,0.0007512047,0.000440117,0.00036846907,0.00013561478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997167,0.0004125037,0.00066867017,0.0015715888,0.0010250468,0.004319195,0.0006864118,0.0019559602,0.012017276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049548387,0.00037420672,0.00049084733,0.001945268,0.0047023115,0.00680808,0.0020193474,0.0011086034,0.0013266299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052887517,0.00003932201,0.0009666528,0.00021152827,0.000019579471,0.00014892002,0.00020115433,0.0041242656,0.0003582624,0.9600396,0.0032204804,0.030617349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034202763,0.0000915322,0.0022570132,0.0002982093,0.000031589636,0.00030838905,0.000586856,0.0045899185,0.0006798144,0.89426726,0.09683339,0.000021803115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004611693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034818538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012017276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00494402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030912799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040201783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972548698","doi":"10.1177/1091142103031004003","title":"The Measurement of Interregional Redistribution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Per capita; Economics; Revenue; Fiscal federalism; Per capita income; Federal state; Redistribution of income and wealth; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Population; Decentralization; Economic policy; Demography; Political science; Unemployment","score_opus":0.09293327618407321,"score_gpt":0.241448343202734,"score_spread":0.1485150670186608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972548698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77992713,0.0033022487,0.043149326,0.00069095165,0.00007215388,0.0001103237,0.0020351599,0.00017586909,0.17053673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403703,0.00043451463,0.0037267017,0.000032939297,0.000018258088,0.000030862622,0.00042031505,0.000017536993,0.0012819411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998919,0.00043473355,0.000072945564,0.00017210557,0.00027297478,0.00012824353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979444,0.0002575258,0.00086285226,0.0003742735,0.00045993557,0.000101022495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015753313,0.00032760616,0.00038745784,0.0038365507,0.0005332906,0.00115317,0.0005220534,0.00017723133,0.0026219646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044444874,0.00012696214,0.00027106388,0.0062342244,0.0011011363,0.0017239504,0.0023577735,0.00041342704,0.00048481234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058186095,0.0001643758,0.56294376,0.0005081503,0.0007809153,0.0003727349,0.0052552293,0.025872039,0.008263144,0.16954157,0.006859415,0.21885692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038736413,0.00015618294,0.87120134,0.0002523615,0.00015981507,0.00072154653,0.0067334343,0.0076861354,0.004042594,0.046217375,0.06273977,0.000050569863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005230992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005616762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005230992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013483083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009342796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01040107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974494107","doi":"10.1177/109114210002800102","title":"Explaining the Evolution of Government Size in the Canadian Provinces","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Economics; Voting; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics; Control (management); Measure (data warehouse); Macroeconomics; Series (stratigraphy); Public economics; Political science; Law; Statistics; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03096720854109277,"score_gpt":0.21154036134813806,"score_spread":0.18057315280704528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974494107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850814,0.00085929694,0.00076423225,0.0016876033,0.000019797266,0.000020743633,0.0039219637,0.000048633432,0.007596406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969145,0.00028798403,0.00023049446,0.000037020804,0.0000052549303,0.0000046770106,0.0010990065,0.0000060086145,0.0014150428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914885,0.00007048827,0.00003356324,0.00011893847,0.0002158826,0.0004122768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944031,0.0011299296,0.0011054085,0.00026285092,0.0024737178,0.0006249336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014468444,0.00028550733,0.00044812803,0.0027880087,0.0014634806,0.0020171325,0.00094599527,0.00045185475,0.002055431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438925,0.000277054,0.0006840494,0.0047873543,0.0009729535,0.0005787978,0.0008570607,0.0006649813,0.0001720975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001981877,0.000033740766,0.92623353,0.000067033725,0.00018471436,0.0002695065,0.0013222592,0.029205661,0.00063325994,0.012730196,0.0060198517,0.023102086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012953692,0.000013487062,0.9737376,0.000027784616,0.000047759273,0.00002736069,0.0011270479,0.018652445,0.00019467033,0.0010452253,0.005082131,0.000031631957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99244624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036895424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036895424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023838311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26769632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980540775","doi":"10.1177/109114210203000501","title":"James McGill Buchanan: Nobel Laureate, 1986","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nobel laureate; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07774882548268433,"score_gpt":0.22347074235115294,"score_spread":0.1457219168684686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980540775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010340083,0.64139247,0.003378737,0.102544785,0.031682663,0.000027167793,0.001984212,0.0005575083,0.21739842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009888522,0.1547605,0.0015184793,0.0055810004,0.004518765,0.000029075234,0.00047371635,0.0002132602,0.82301676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960965,0.00005051138,0.0000240373,0.00008509878,0.0001696507,0.000060990264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936813,0.00008950727,0.00006395711,0.000049148854,0.0002938956,0.00013535819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008274564,0.0010539638,0.00079634815,0.0022759538,0.0013204053,0.0029061462,0.00066499814,0.0020872678,0.07390993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023278864,0.0004768644,0.00028324264,0.0026033795,0.00085854955,0.0029883801,0.0014007917,0.0023901796,0.044282768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023821138,0.000009037071,0.00010001632,0.000082406084,0.0000048411366,0.00001958487,0.000022099046,0.00008868979,0.00005134949,0.0076266807,0.9191023,0.0728692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044125204,0.00000451763,0.00040683805,0.00019905885,0.0000067311203,0.000038508624,0.000026755979,0.000058217476,0.00008242498,0.0049490165,0.9942173,0.000006211984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019472258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06368611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07390993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031668083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004487724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24725336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986353521","doi":"10.1177/1091142106292498","title":"Taxing Consumption in Jamaica","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Revenue; Tax revenue; Value-added tax; Consumption tax; Tax reform; Shadow (psychology); Public economics; Indirect tax; Sales tax; Value (mathematics); Macroeconomics; Economic policy; Ad valorem tax; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07303948150723977,"score_gpt":0.2542928373240532,"score_spread":0.18125335581681346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986353521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85661936,0.010882007,0.00096297223,0.0063680573,0.00009512705,0.00007701507,0.0009084366,0.000029109136,0.12405788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764202,0.0075392695,0.00065274606,0.00046408043,0.000057713372,0.000014252688,0.00032094173,0.0000037943337,0.014527022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976236,0.000060839757,0.000015751395,0.00003157505,0.000074138385,0.000055354565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960023,0.000097001415,0.00012591139,0.000026796783,0.00012814558,0.000021921598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004433577,0.000076879965,0.000117478114,0.0006599976,0.0007410054,0.0009781315,0.0002517711,0.0003188134,0.0011309508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013528463,0.000077970304,0.00011531386,0.0024410796,0.00053474563,0.00031528267,0.00037914774,0.0005381589,0.00010656932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040305097,0.00038562264,0.39045322,0.0011175586,0.00011855599,0.0052265124,0.0066435677,0.014205758,0.0053831507,0.20058753,0.029273657,0.3462018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011593986,0.00019789822,0.75163585,0.0006746843,0.000111222354,0.0013988978,0.006364281,0.00760934,0.003062275,0.01128961,0.21749547,0.000044568376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37012404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4336818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37012404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047481414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004258566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7359394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996223686","doi":"10.1177/1091142103253753","title":"The Uneasy Case Against Discriminatory Excise Taxation: Soft Drink Taxes in Ireland","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Economics; Laffer curve; Indirect tax; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Revenue; Tax reform; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Tax revenue; Public economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; State income tax; Macroeconomics; Gross income; Market economy","score_opus":0.044909561026286224,"score_gpt":0.23638939712398968,"score_spread":0.19147983609770347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996223686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123033,0.00085075473,0.0017997976,0.007474802,0.000054927044,0.00010409731,0.0000871373,0.000016673113,0.07730847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963666,0.0004241062,0.000584915,0.00029390623,0.0000142722965,0.00001517646,0.000029037148,0.000004219301,0.002267829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606824,0.001967065,0.00012602244,0.00021372143,0.0007348431,0.0008900297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921693,0.0038444186,0.002131199,0.0005075201,0.0009780755,0.0003695239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033424732,0.00023910208,0.0006853558,0.0011874778,0.001455887,0.004880605,0.0010513839,0.0020557968,0.001902705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011788765,0.00024040736,0.0006381664,0.0013791563,0.0034299644,0.0027233646,0.0019576484,0.0022875476,0.0002380405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022831166,0.003646789,0.22482333,0.0013033361,0.00036034753,0.0097285835,0.0076583973,0.061269224,0.0023926091,0.5519142,0.018225316,0.116394676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002208786,0.0034852151,0.29608148,0.0020415196,0.00052933476,0.0040072026,0.10437606,0.08739719,0.015380498,0.28533697,0.19860756,0.0005480961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05897544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068226114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05897544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075568375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039993664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11726433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998499961","doi":"10.1177/1091142106296413","title":"Competitive Governments, Globalization, and Equalization Grants","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Competition (biology); Economics; Public good; Capital (architecture); Goods and services; Public sector; Payment; Race to the bottom; Economic policy; Market economy; Business; Finance; Economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02519921920339608,"score_gpt":0.3182010724211086,"score_spread":0.29300185321771255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998499961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063494265,0.10722067,0.0046951408,0.06869536,0.00073905307,0.00004427449,0.000090764304,0.000049148646,0.75497127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157258,0.042559564,0.0011911344,0.0067974743,0.00091237004,0.000038225982,0.000062595594,0.000018135526,0.032694686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694026,0.0011620775,0.00008487177,0.00025342067,0.0010672736,0.00049225317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972801,0.0012105125,0.0004866915,0.00020718444,0.00054920383,0.00026617906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033660063,0.00019796475,0.00028524638,0.0017383462,0.001309128,0.0041074515,0.00052606175,0.0017793052,0.006673674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005480309,0.00013442425,0.00023663728,0.0025935671,0.0073231184,0.0037948252,0.0023418653,0.0014467067,0.00033540383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006663427,0.000013331322,0.0005500792,0.000067087596,0.000005941158,0.00003583807,0.00021727843,0.00032941654,0.000025905727,0.97231907,0.005017949,0.02141142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026644953,0.000038484315,0.006233779,0.000454249,0.00002065488,0.00017437074,0.0011425706,0.00037254987,0.0001497495,0.69508094,0.2962891,0.000016990629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007171128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011141944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007171128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005046132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053967065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03661239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022253496","doi":"10.1177/1091142107301954","title":"Labor and Capital Taxation with Public Inputs as Common Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economics; Returns to scale; Microeconomics; Capital (architecture); Production (economics); Public capital; Means of production; Profit (economics); Public economics; Financial capital","score_opus":0.03619052881900492,"score_gpt":0.23272090116161637,"score_spread":0.19653037234261145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022253496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26731893,0.01269327,0.24631926,0.027471695,0.00088489975,0.00023636369,0.00055632886,0.00015992952,0.44435936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429625,0.0031830065,0.0067257676,0.0004165746,0.0002370148,0.000052073538,0.000053437103,0.00001570793,0.04635393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925643,0.00025748447,0.00003132154,0.0001337303,0.00014615749,0.00017490241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988439,0.0004593025,0.00028720684,0.00022805529,0.0001162023,0.00006530367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008297434,0.000661647,0.0008410929,0.0006952258,0.00090263924,0.0036035532,0.000818697,0.0022485275,0.004362059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026549124,0.00034178328,0.0009880447,0.0009281686,0.0031531143,0.003851999,0.0012900026,0.0015696266,0.0004691793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003644852,0.000045812485,0.00058409024,0.000046500787,0.000020395737,0.00010495107,0.000060650313,0.02278493,0.0002319149,0.9683155,0.0012895748,0.0064792056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007670469,0.000042198906,0.00079264643,0.000109817825,0.000045328292,0.00009103809,0.000120735116,0.045154676,0.00080141914,0.9296241,0.02312328,0.000018170358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076033035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007870467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076033035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061047706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026515508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044293404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051170174","doi":"10.1177/1091142111430682","title":"Sweet and Not-So-Sweet Charity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Public economics; Earnings; Order (exchange); Welfare; Government (linguistics); Private good; Social Welfare; Public good; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05702669095331902,"score_gpt":0.3155892491066585,"score_spread":0.25856255815333945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051170174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118616074,0.0096414555,0.04355366,0.05558365,0.000996898,0.000107777785,0.00026401845,0.00015270326,0.7710838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771451,0.004554278,0.008953361,0.0074297073,0.00029997024,0.000096239564,0.00008783671,0.000044642846,0.10138881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966709,0.0015310388,0.00009517366,0.0003342298,0.00079288287,0.00057590834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982559,0.00035008002,0.0003427601,0.00033164147,0.00039746685,0.00032215362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037425498,0.00029637953,0.0004672708,0.0008048916,0.0022855808,0.0031405063,0.00049048464,0.0019513562,0.005574414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388995,0.00020679698,0.0004112925,0.0009615019,0.0045284536,0.002629402,0.0031282802,0.0017037109,0.0011619566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027812657,0.000040252206,0.0015600238,0.00009563797,0.000019221312,0.000054489705,0.00042830544,0.00058403425,0.00032539075,0.9639683,0.009094485,0.023802204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028702774,0.00013454806,0.00997024,0.00044753563,0.0000305647,0.00077189365,0.002171359,0.0014984569,0.0007503622,0.6861317,0.29803398,0.000030725998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017428194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056954366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005574414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014821542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026195128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019792736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051473999","doi":"10.1177/1091142106291474","title":"Experimental Evidence on Mixing Modes in Income Tax Evasion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Revenue; Evasion (ethics); Portfolio; Public economics; Economics; Tax evasion; Compliance (psychology); Offset (computer science); Income tax; Business; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.10929430921499772,"score_gpt":0.29096112558057,"score_spread":0.1816668163655723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051473999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717423,0.0005171217,0.0053675827,0.0005863941,0.000054957643,0.000260267,0.0001167379,0.000051686802,0.021303045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157363,0.00042016886,0.0046246224,0.00027483827,0.000025970108,0.00020637784,0.00009745531,0.000020885205,0.0027560643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944443,0.006358616,0.00075047417,0.001068376,0.0020870832,0.00029099415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9274662,0.043987386,0.014984498,0.010746807,0.0016656771,0.0011494125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009039006,0.00066622504,0.0005852568,0.0009086035,0.0005858179,0.00177702,0.0008693447,0.0018611497,0.0098987175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04453552,0.00069799554,0.00048638543,0.0006278693,0.0017066338,0.0017241283,0.0013147251,0.0016707336,0.0010108728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031362247,0.07893387,0.22058858,0.0024710028,0.0017575293,0.0011209112,0.0062468676,0.008692693,0.19863267,0.114448264,0.005289009,0.3304564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008215635,0.07684325,0.4835397,0.0012655612,0.001777732,0.005303796,0.0043575275,0.056236025,0.15870804,0.16931403,0.033899378,0.0005393454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006508531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062532525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098987175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071137067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006415362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047803342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053439067","doi":"10.1177/1091142106288392","title":"Analyzing the Interdependence of Regulation and Taxation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Public economics; Tax policy; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Tax reform","score_opus":0.03304510512042698,"score_gpt":0.22577210639782916,"score_spread":0.19272700127740217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053439067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42047828,0.010695381,0.25202894,0.027677407,0.00038452144,0.00020727326,0.0002987288,0.00014351445,0.288086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98100364,0.0038547884,0.005909393,0.0005214392,0.00014246398,0.000058244936,0.000054657015,0.000027578844,0.008427908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967989,0.0013022893,0.00015351246,0.00035618147,0.00068662385,0.0007024858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98761743,0.0079406,0.002412745,0.0007163479,0.0011378733,0.0001750342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004203489,0.00028204106,0.0010111628,0.001534335,0.0010247784,0.004488163,0.0008290471,0.0016940259,0.003770662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015400269,0.00043733753,0.0008931422,0.0019183143,0.0035217383,0.004647644,0.0021378838,0.0024509951,0.00035121554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002104972,0.00003369939,0.003226448,0.000036485995,0.000025123587,0.00006395929,0.00012806804,0.023511717,0.00021112214,0.9634385,0.00043854798,0.0088653155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024707788,0.000031940424,0.0068563013,0.00008036771,0.000042471456,0.00007246933,0.00032484607,0.048441682,0.0008250013,0.93217963,0.011091451,0.000029281962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075297854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004584345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075297854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052200663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036200255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03787446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058686587","doi":"10.1177/109114210002800103","title":"Revenue Structures, The Perceived Price of Government Output, and Public Expenditures","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Economics; Government revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Monetary economics; Illusion; Public finance; Debt; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.04171482027852279,"score_gpt":0.22416568847382257,"score_spread":0.18245086819529976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058686587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99282175,0.00016816237,0.00039477987,0.00030672448,0.000003678823,0.0000117743775,0.0002081755,0.0000060682296,0.0060788323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989895,0.000094596835,0.0000783419,0.000013433278,0.00000401737,0.0000023069463,0.0001420159,0.000001673139,0.00067403074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994272,0.000112033675,0.00002515159,0.000053920077,0.00020155507,0.0001801226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914655,0.0031903978,0.0033681155,0.0003270636,0.0007531321,0.0008958334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008544176,0.0002298834,0.00023862085,0.00075114635,0.00031835295,0.0018167669,0.00033284948,0.0003656815,0.0031077585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008324717,0.00012687597,0.00034030265,0.0009089949,0.0009853373,0.0007151329,0.00054299075,0.0009402789,0.00025737745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020974452,0.00017355397,0.9805736,0.000020522693,0.00011521562,0.00008822253,0.0003871274,0.0035427788,0.00035281037,0.004911506,0.00034020294,0.009284751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010332241,0.000063641215,0.99412787,0.000010135741,0.000034929526,0.00002866579,0.00050096214,0.0026610845,0.00018488876,0.001764715,0.00060282316,0.000009987083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15957607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17306368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15957607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004919667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021119767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31729442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059837247","doi":"10.1177/1091142111401009","title":"The Utility Compensated Effects of a Wage Tax on Human Capital and Consumption Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Portfolio; Consumption (sociology); Wage; Context (archaeology); Human capital; Yield (engineering); Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Labour economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.14356214623442498,"score_gpt":0.27589479332172195,"score_spread":0.13233264708729697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059837247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79542917,0.005197698,0.07487027,0.008684991,0.00034649664,0.00011771261,0.0006512498,0.00007451506,0.114627905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773836,0.0020023705,0.0023895619,0.00021515042,0.00005313749,0.000014655921,0.000058420697,0.000008505972,0.017874697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961984,0.00017549143,0.000015777185,0.00004827708,0.0000597223,0.000080943864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980716,0.0012502694,0.00029201809,0.00013145276,0.0001591938,0.00009555961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010042589,0.0003809353,0.0003524979,0.0003261468,0.00033101754,0.0015558049,0.00031951445,0.0008372164,0.007702707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061013894,0.00027141508,0.00049124,0.00043679695,0.00081429526,0.001370073,0.00059348496,0.0011221151,0.0004347708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010150707,0.0004767374,0.02638072,0.00021949034,0.00022571944,0.0008935234,0.0007342164,0.11341784,0.003911527,0.73706245,0.0045041214,0.1111586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015686566,0.00050164515,0.056727275,0.00016230711,0.00022442576,0.0004311328,0.0009005001,0.12474052,0.0033444413,0.7992417,0.013462677,0.00010645152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055664475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066580866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007702707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016553254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008537271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025768101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071113445","doi":"10.1177/1091142113515053","title":"Fiscal Incidence When Family Structure Matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Allowance (engineering); Incidence (geometry); Population; Welfare; Public economics; Order (exchange); Tax incidence; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Demography; Finance; Operations management","score_opus":0.023291559062155357,"score_gpt":0.2771567131425435,"score_spread":0.2538651540803881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071113445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374656,0.0003788631,0.010217127,0.0019172294,0.00004062848,0.000037869875,0.0005812044,0.00004450292,0.04931701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967303,0.00024973197,0.0004995461,0.000047510064,0.000013532878,0.000009453375,0.00013508527,0.000006990106,0.002307831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990971,0.0003304066,0.00003180037,0.00007467377,0.0001420576,0.0003239143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974565,0.0012689545,0.0005719686,0.0002845809,0.00027756576,0.00014054347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019020467,0.00019416983,0.00048225682,0.00073015713,0.0005610128,0.0018387729,0.0006494484,0.00056600216,0.010092044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009513162,0.00016289817,0.00052331237,0.0009444904,0.0011070346,0.0012908065,0.0009636975,0.00092766114,0.0003772592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030972727,0.00025811532,0.3147907,0.00007356089,0.00009085976,0.00055122556,0.0014470434,0.11989309,0.00058608135,0.48171532,0.006016774,0.07426744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010308362,0.00030966185,0.3433652,0.00017220998,0.00014811686,0.000853032,0.008760028,0.22920087,0.0014187597,0.38328445,0.03228842,0.000096209114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029798064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025689535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029798064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036770974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015442204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059249222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095361156","doi":"10.1177/1091142106292774","title":"Debt Aversion and the Demand for Loans for Postsecondary Education","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Subsidy; Economics; Investment (military); Payment; Finance; Cash; Student debt; Monetary economics; Actuarial science; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.013326839088831458,"score_gpt":0.256763282723967,"score_spread":0.24343644363513553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095361156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987135,0.000046671903,0.000030904783,0.00006226545,0.0000018143751,0.0000104070195,0.000056316338,0.0000013030286,0.0010768754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980288,0.00007035736,0.000066463384,0.000091957874,0.0000029909647,0.000008029259,0.00013691951,6.184655e-7,0.001593866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995815,0.00009327951,0.000023628407,0.000042301006,0.0001434361,0.000115793555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318016,0.002435081,0.0025137928,0.00031550854,0.00052610796,0.0010293019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001611131,0.00017739128,0.0003194484,0.00045934707,0.0009716581,0.0008785186,0.0003258211,0.0005232146,0.0037437787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004665034,0.00016857847,0.00028543547,0.0005358104,0.0005971028,0.00022012249,0.00030623842,0.0008026727,0.00028598792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007464888,0.0014696391,0.9886326,0.000015927804,0.000057521796,0.0000726551,0.0011882685,0.00010872281,0.00064881466,0.00025849818,0.00033177706,0.0064690216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052807205,0.00034851782,0.9968663,0.000007465993,0.000027455653,0.00004170615,0.0011990514,0.00027879336,0.00022288498,0.0001857584,0.00076024176,0.000009064904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.220858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3171199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.220858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019148847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014357488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4391449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099243768","doi":"10.1177/1091142111403620","title":"The Income Elasticity of Lottery: New Evidence from Micro Data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Euros; Economics; Tobit model; Consumer Expenditure Survey; Income elasticity of demand; Econometrics; Consumer expenditure; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Aggregate expenditure; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.47895665119800457,"score_gpt":0.4323330199569172,"score_spread":0.04662363124108737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099243768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96546406,0.0095170615,0.0078980075,0.002500556,0.000112180154,0.00006421184,0.004441894,0.00006939546,0.0099327285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901333,0.003088974,0.0011311165,0.00030045552,0.00016089912,0.000039322324,0.0039150575,0.000024494613,0.0012064729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969702,0.0016887711,0.00023938017,0.00036444978,0.00056076114,0.00017645436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85844254,0.11245765,0.018837987,0.0061681163,0.003165004,0.0009287075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005760703,0.00042374336,0.0009206048,0.0032785267,0.0003171255,0.0018574771,0.0008933417,0.0008874992,0.006698046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038126796,0.00037603482,0.001091582,0.0052474416,0.00076430803,0.0012801265,0.0012567437,0.0015520355,0.0011704714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005636532,0.00028211754,0.95108473,0.00029265697,0.001351223,0.0001656034,0.0003455733,0.004566978,0.000066442764,0.0044897273,0.004005237,0.032786198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010396677,0.0001864659,0.96505505,0.00030763118,0.0007070097,0.0002625278,0.0014028302,0.010850063,0.00021250035,0.013296507,0.0075532123,0.000062309344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060463124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004204232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006698046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054364844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026759531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030465841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125102675","doi":"10.1177/1091142106289173","title":"The Marginal Cost of Public Funds Is the Ratio of Mean Income to Median Income","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deadweight loss; Economics; Numéraire; Marginal utility; Welfare; Marginal cost; Income tax; Public expenditure; Median income; Labour economics; Public economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.05100712260792484,"score_gpt":0.2467065954327474,"score_spread":0.19569947282482256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125102675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05184943,0.034831528,0.39754963,0.066946924,0.0035365135,0.00011533368,0.002144969,0.0005071121,0.44251853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85686237,0.033781424,0.041524183,0.004021893,0.005127554,0.00028390685,0.000543746,0.0003455304,0.05750951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980691,0.00062631693,0.00009466772,0.00036225741,0.0006216195,0.00022597957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963134,0.0021682533,0.0004738263,0.0004070119,0.0005534822,0.00008408133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025884002,0.0005141753,0.00092631334,0.0016568658,0.0006112183,0.0035475232,0.0012022691,0.0010806996,0.012823845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011958218,0.00024003308,0.0007756146,0.0015285013,0.003412539,0.004939935,0.0014115195,0.0022371535,0.0021807316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012251973,0.00000507523,0.000390807,0.00005519736,0.000010960009,0.000017728387,0.00004576537,0.0011771749,0.00007389055,0.97928876,0.0051740054,0.013748388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011642069,0.000034907473,0.002061528,0.0001774639,0.000026819296,0.00036953372,0.00010501711,0.0029999688,0.0005606388,0.8998668,0.093764596,0.000021075193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017940702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009843258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012823845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002914059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018545107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042900026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130968718","doi":"10.1177/1091142104271139","title":"Fiscal Reserves and State Own-Source Expenditure in Downturn Years","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Fiscal policy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Recession; Panel data; Variance (accounting); Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Geography","score_opus":0.029467807761204258,"score_gpt":0.2359295178273196,"score_spread":0.20646171006611536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130968718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99813014,0.00021902233,0.00004054961,0.00009497492,0.0000059616946,0.0000018350279,0.00041032236,0.0000061907454,0.0010910478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809057,0.00020130201,0.000017605384,0.000017550734,0.000010666021,0.0000028180727,0.0011023057,0.0000032848789,0.0005538206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995789,0.000116894356,0.000037704696,0.000047267844,0.00006597959,0.00015328867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920363,0.0018074722,0.004854223,0.00021123169,0.00055460364,0.00053623464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008822624,0.00019914382,0.00043681133,0.0011972272,0.00020894365,0.00096031895,0.00020565749,0.00021840338,0.0031515977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004531371,0.00015443611,0.0004881751,0.0011905835,0.0002949459,0.00045282574,0.00070495234,0.00060959853,0.00036186972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480362,0.0001024623,0.9894252,0.000029563953,0.00019357172,0.00010772747,0.00018465299,0.0014841702,0.00035246363,0.0005640249,0.0007099657,0.006298078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000100156885,0.00008855347,0.9980855,0.0000116783,0.00006795396,0.000046313973,0.00019118213,0.00051348936,0.0001931312,0.00007770687,0.0007104843,0.000004015113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015025908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016006652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015025908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006058103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032495466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029876888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131545578","doi":"10.1177/1091142104264369","title":"Do Government Expenditures Crowd Out Corporate Contributions?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Microdata (statistics); Government spending; Government (linguistics); Economics; Public economics; Business; Monetary economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06653370226227419,"score_gpt":0.34201022908435746,"score_spread":0.2754765268220833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131545578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422347,0.0054534636,0.0021528478,0.013755098,0.00020646404,0.00005489656,0.0008252759,0.00010417497,0.03521311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945005,0.00090992637,0.0001853384,0.0007909462,0.0001383549,0.000016194488,0.0002902449,0.00002263591,0.0031457972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451786,0.0015478454,0.00034978925,0.00079095917,0.0011642053,0.001629409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477029,0.018454866,0.024351127,0.0032773837,0.0031519716,0.0030618398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008101815,0.00031961835,0.0013136399,0.003287455,0.0011141187,0.0032230127,0.0007928586,0.001190813,0.00592327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039249003,0.000515413,0.0005209665,0.004807637,0.0019509642,0.0028950407,0.002216721,0.0012292934,0.0010969463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004361961,0.00021564944,0.8199343,0.0003330489,0.00039924553,0.0006257294,0.0040039667,0.002202813,0.00054431026,0.04553761,0.015979541,0.10978751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070874,0.00014121401,0.9124283,0.00040054673,0.00017101699,0.00037584704,0.006339344,0.002347371,0.00078305573,0.03344106,0.04345675,0.000044574128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012184085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018933123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012184085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016141835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019491415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042847037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140033782","doi":"10.1177/1091142105285576","title":"Measures of Fiscal Dependency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Fiscal sustainability; Dependency ratio; Economics; Population; Fiscal union; Fiscal policy; Dependency (UML); Sustainability; Macroeconomics; Fiscal year; Fiscal imbalance; Fiscal federalism; Development economics; Finance; Demography","score_opus":0.12570777354267193,"score_gpt":0.44440330134338085,"score_spread":0.3186955278007089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140033782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51361716,0.007367483,0.012344303,0.0031454202,0.00047283038,0.00076094794,0.042975765,0.0002116866,0.41910434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946547,0.005369589,0.00828726,0.00054848497,0.00023936,0.00088088424,0.020210959,0.00005429753,0.017862182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690646,0.00076304394,0.00049521954,0.00016628712,0.0013748957,0.00029407977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842913,0.0030374692,0.0067732874,0.0006962128,0.004294005,0.0009076981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004527495,0.0005262749,0.00037781277,0.010334675,0.0010377705,0.0015725931,0.00068195735,0.0003636771,0.009522202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019560287,0.00016095706,0.0007022116,0.009919246,0.000695353,0.0016570181,0.001694751,0.0008000508,0.0013218971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003965775,0.00037474316,0.73535115,0.0007866251,0.00070216047,0.00018807793,0.0029580232,0.0036877627,0.00036360775,0.05427836,0.05260187,0.14831108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029581426,0.00028941283,0.84011924,0.0003439669,0.00016618043,0.00060764194,0.0035337543,0.00096851465,0.0004351212,0.010460807,0.14298077,0.00006506075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021481419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02841942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021481419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029997332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025948973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042712748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W215052529","doi":"10.1177/1091142115584815","title":"Casting a Long Shadow? Cross-border Spillovers of Shadow Economy across American States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Ceteris paribus; Economics; Spillover effect; State (computer science); Economy; Product (mathematics); Macroeconomics; Microeconomics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08147572059241544,"score_gpt":0.3671245405561318,"score_spread":0.2856488199637164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W215052529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98760325,0.00080572267,0.0011409604,0.00055647,0.000009815987,0.0000098616065,0.00012592941,0.000012976381,0.009735122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.00029966686,0.00009583869,0.000048560854,0.0000072203497,0.0000019325596,0.00005350948,0.0000016153856,0.0003715984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996573,0.00010693931,0.000016365395,0.0000633864,0.00006202231,0.00009412985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757737,0.0009481073,0.0007467195,0.00026867574,0.00031418685,0.00014499361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008081945,0.00009529789,0.0003578987,0.0007301763,0.0005451919,0.0009858452,0.00016687476,0.00020843586,0.004595927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027468097,0.00010955621,0.00029269562,0.0012668847,0.00075288233,0.0009051955,0.0010635433,0.00043799067,0.00014491018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038702885,0.00034618168,0.8213301,0.00015525753,0.00038418453,0.00054618524,0.0037526542,0.010711059,0.0019356519,0.05622542,0.003706348,0.10051988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023723946,0.00010525013,0.96382016,0.000114721784,0.0002407562,0.0000972154,0.0077650934,0.0040593995,0.00095023436,0.014510072,0.0082910955,0.000022237415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026338737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03687514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026338737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096108654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073733646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052370846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152096695","doi":"10.1177/1091142103254584","title":"How “Parasites” Serve their Host: A Graphical Analysis of “Scalping”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; Market power; Revenue; Joint (building); Market analysis; Business; Host (biology); Economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Marketing; Finance; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.029377700485195127,"score_gpt":0.21381970679400544,"score_spread":0.1844420063088103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152096695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66601366,0.0021197055,0.280596,0.0060516265,0.00027307696,0.00021463657,0.0026218076,0.0016750869,0.040434465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801339,0.00023040338,0.015900403,0.00018550032,0.000059962265,0.000038645718,0.0003866065,0.000098324184,0.0029662496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989944,0.0005536722,0.000029801355,0.0001615893,0.000116913936,0.00014358049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864516,0.009558942,0.001650497,0.0009620242,0.00091884664,0.0004580066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020482712,0.00034972455,0.00054237,0.0021527316,0.0008432789,0.0020381662,0.0006868227,0.000898875,0.0109326085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013366595,0.00018660365,0.0007470317,0.0018332483,0.0015152502,0.002442146,0.00084405305,0.00084346416,0.00091378833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019518549,0.00015875969,0.18932088,0.0008145611,0.0006940709,0.0022213722,0.005737184,0.04740182,0.01316449,0.41564116,0.059595533,0.2632983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023410055,0.00041592997,0.1810938,0.00022565744,0.00074050436,0.0017113913,0.004909657,0.43684873,0.0038609377,0.30385768,0.06593566,0.00016593646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007932825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007653222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109326085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086919847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004056683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03657317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152627881","doi":"10.1177/109114210102900201","title":"Tipping and the Mcquatters Formula","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Imputation (statistics); Credit card; Cash; Revenue; Internal revenue; Evasion (ethics); Econometrics; Monetary economics; Tax deduction; Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Payment; Public economics; Tax reform; Service (business); Macroeconomics; State income tax; Finance; Gross income; Missing data; Statistics; Economy","score_opus":0.05435266897088238,"score_gpt":0.36775616461353927,"score_spread":0.3134034956426569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152627881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032070566,0.027794622,0.09118644,0.084252104,0.004575443,0.00012414757,0.00028992206,0.00041542348,0.75929135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7941103,0.011257433,0.021646678,0.008198408,0.0034215203,0.00013717906,0.0000987895,0.00016290043,0.16096683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753237,0.00076297275,0.00007956813,0.00027455259,0.0011287206,0.00022174444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957552,0.0022844428,0.00030114682,0.00064991537,0.0008748286,0.00013444955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029126117,0.00037482724,0.00058417395,0.0014520523,0.0012578125,0.0022141195,0.0016749767,0.0023592096,0.021773502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020288259,0.00028133232,0.0005300703,0.0010807285,0.004974487,0.004150211,0.001247486,0.004526857,0.0029188306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015447275,0.000012652144,0.00017153329,0.000019424842,0.0000049611754,0.00005686988,0.000051093666,0.00044320963,0.000030526277,0.9597202,0.011501784,0.027972221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014572964,0.000019556357,0.0003753481,0.00004064269,0.0000059323797,0.00017959661,0.000042373507,0.003163672,0.00014604861,0.9449558,0.051046345,0.000010078401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003477472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027062935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021773502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021601438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010337293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07283956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156158318","doi":"10.1177/109114210002800305","title":"On the Incentive Effects of Municipal Tax Credits","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Liability; Business; Work (physics); Ad valorem tax; Subsidy; Property tax; Tax reform; Finance; Public economics; Investment (military); Incentive; State income tax; Value-added tax; Economics; Double taxation; Microeconomics; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.027666680033648024,"score_gpt":0.21681298650118816,"score_spread":0.18914630646754013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156158318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6410671,0.009907686,0.008665144,0.012911183,0.000355461,0.00038036352,0.0010403966,0.0001538563,0.32551876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98154426,0.0027702942,0.00048287402,0.00056742685,0.00015327093,0.000027951442,0.00010906372,0.000015674883,0.014329124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978611,0.00070395303,0.000053213153,0.00011616726,0.00040614608,0.0008594772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98775196,0.006926656,0.0023022427,0.0003407839,0.0018982973,0.0007799722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034392218,0.0005248584,0.0009839999,0.0017770157,0.0015943432,0.0030749678,0.00091114675,0.0017838954,0.018646989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015814539,0.00028408563,0.0006937542,0.0019990944,0.001958568,0.0018007407,0.0016834443,0.0017490343,0.00063604297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082725415,0.0011958855,0.065655075,0.00038422196,0.00022894442,0.0008988164,0.0007775707,0.06445025,0.0009333003,0.7298186,0.024931246,0.10989881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012743003,0.0017146677,0.2672861,0.001239687,0.0017621581,0.0005493298,0.0057455706,0.118775666,0.0036057136,0.39641246,0.20133832,0.0002959342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14156057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14000416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14156057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071526906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061697867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28147316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171617590","doi":"10.1177/1091142109331638","title":"Do Local Residents Value Federal Transfers?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Decentralization; Attractiveness; Public economics; Transfer payment; Differential (mechanical device); Welfare","score_opus":0.07256369239287445,"score_gpt":0.2461175943233951,"score_spread":0.17355390193052067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171617590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382707,0.0007027395,0.0002233246,0.016092606,0.000030293737,0.000020412635,0.0003390491,0.000010475307,0.04431035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961505,0.00044712573,0.000037516078,0.0005163364,0.000020626672,0.0000057103666,0.00006683603,0.0000017845339,0.0027535798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993754,0.00018925729,0.000012427104,0.000034381643,0.00010476399,0.00028386482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751127,0.00059514533,0.0007620069,0.000103501814,0.0005533893,0.00047470196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009382183,0.00007286865,0.00027926525,0.00058993645,0.0011772772,0.0019951416,0.00047307918,0.00064217765,0.009858301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075946804,0.00008707374,0.00011344751,0.0015887861,0.0010627097,0.0015486379,0.0006434951,0.0006100516,0.0006016728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035155675,0.00038301534,0.7407795,0.00025292765,0.00010610001,0.00065393944,0.017508265,0.0014319248,0.00039467032,0.036848154,0.030995488,0.17029443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006078554,0.00018909763,0.78653425,0.00035339614,0.00011317917,0.0002758932,0.13161345,0.0014978477,0.00038520992,0.01699454,0.061933883,0.000048490103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1259478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26913947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1259478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036123868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024882003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2504294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465122161","doi":"10.1177/1091142115602064","title":"Block Grants and Education Expenditure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"MacEwan University","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Block grant; Per capita; Economics; Aggregate expenditure; Federal funds; Panel data; Demographic economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Finance; Demography; Monetary policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07713077896420419,"score_gpt":0.26126811115844634,"score_spread":0.18413733219424216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465122161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9128059,0.0037008265,0.0011906475,0.0035143518,0.000077331744,0.00009572847,0.040204924,0.00009418873,0.038316023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97541434,0.0016671105,0.00027439513,0.00013906942,0.00003033501,0.000030036144,0.009656343,0.000011357798,0.012776993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790263,0.0002388767,0.00008453821,0.0001598671,0.00078629894,0.0008277783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399793,0.0015601865,0.0016931554,0.00023232237,0.0016316695,0.00088475295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088881084,0.00019173746,0.00046309156,0.0021164042,0.00075067696,0.0013572217,0.000477306,0.00036442955,0.009048263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008585449,0.00016854344,0.0003566011,0.0046148724,0.0005901232,0.00049420126,0.0008832054,0.0008548212,0.0006728048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038753843,0.000091996146,0.9257121,0.00016280546,0.00021352732,0.00018326177,0.00073865766,0.0055546053,0.00032011082,0.011064665,0.017281534,0.03828897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016805656,0.000026700374,0.9730865,0.000047250407,0.000043788965,0.00003492676,0.00044046025,0.00079137506,0.00014885303,0.00052453007,0.024825258,0.000013536629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91713816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9463671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91713816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010361622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014680599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16669959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512315994","doi":"10.1177/1091142116666316","title":"The Incentive Effects of Equalization Grants on Tax Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Tax incentive; Equalization (audio); Public economics; Personal income; Panel data; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.017280344243681005,"score_gpt":0.3176291918596273,"score_spread":0.30034884761594627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512315994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9183695,0.0024314171,0.0062607755,0.0051105055,0.000088824505,0.0001650113,0.0008586212,0.00009295563,0.06662255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971648,0.00041730914,0.00044423452,0.00018338651,0.000027193373,0.00001194442,0.0000818683,0.000004386721,0.0016647647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914767,0.0030058483,0.00028358167,0.00044161186,0.0021853463,0.0026068336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756001,0.012344283,0.0059046913,0.0010935224,0.0037474346,0.0013099575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060603134,0.00018818244,0.0006907392,0.0015175829,0.0011966913,0.0019289411,0.0006660907,0.000644761,0.006354227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039185707,0.00019208844,0.00049237616,0.0024159257,0.002120076,0.0011423684,0.0016934153,0.0015851831,0.00021333397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007070111,0.00060525624,0.4754471,0.0003655232,0.00050754985,0.0002848297,0.0013181187,0.029407922,0.0012186762,0.31539455,0.0064664115,0.16827717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022174648,0.0002990606,0.9001842,0.00027538667,0.00033587814,0.00011455153,0.0013585945,0.010265548,0.0012375719,0.042899594,0.042730503,0.000077337696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1266933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20852004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1266933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008378068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009489522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25191176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516792222","doi":"10.1177/1091142116666671","title":"Tax Incidence and Demand Convexity in Cournot, Bertrand, and Cournot–Bertrand Models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Oregon State University; Michigan State University; Washington State University","keywords":"Cournot competition; Bertrand competition; Bertrand paradox (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Oligopoly","score_opus":0.03921173033282019,"score_gpt":0.2347113735004303,"score_spread":0.19549964316761012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516792222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58692,0.0051472182,0.2860229,0.0037148949,0.00015467734,0.00010203989,0.00055540435,0.00018774756,0.11719511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909129,0.0015068366,0.0032374926,0.00007384443,0.000089829125,0.000017901995,0.00009491837,0.000025731444,0.0040404745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999127,0.00035885733,0.00003556488,0.00009490437,0.000141693,0.00024191359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933015,0.0039222674,0.0014556067,0.00046834373,0.00046367955,0.00038856693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016980134,0.00076447777,0.001330683,0.0013040564,0.0010589119,0.00399072,0.0009994212,0.0009879628,0.005304788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076678013,0.0005874996,0.0012502725,0.0016852025,0.002408459,0.0040431875,0.0015678416,0.0021540576,0.0004633874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008601806,0.000090937785,0.004270827,0.00006995387,0.00007134005,0.00028728583,0.0002324572,0.3008415,0.00055841735,0.6832005,0.002335124,0.00795566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003380771,0.000036007208,0.004671804,0.00003675572,0.00005531417,0.00017899823,0.00019765607,0.593396,0.00031464323,0.39779305,0.0032246318,0.00006131485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01819214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008447368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01819214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029728722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013557335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03617251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520480173","doi":"10.1177/1091142116668253","title":"More on the Impact of Economic Freedom on the Black–White Income Gap","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; White (mutation); Economics; Index (typography); Index of Economic Freedom; Household income; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.07447500833552087,"score_gpt":0.35282920529417017,"score_spread":0.27835419695864927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520480173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79991823,0.11220752,0.0021777223,0.013392148,0.0007790356,0.00005338939,0.010232099,0.00003147566,0.061208323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91353387,0.06144255,0.0012643421,0.0015118519,0.0008115051,0.00005889841,0.007712095,0.00003231426,0.0136325415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996132,0.00013242429,0.000025146319,0.000053148317,0.00009080131,0.00008528196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760026,0.00082086603,0.00097898,0.00010735992,0.00037727802,0.00011527181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013228984,0.0002626284,0.00040679835,0.002850339,0.0003472703,0.00073027716,0.00020978125,0.00025771558,0.0071697566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036838604,0.00006560838,0.00093339203,0.0054084314,0.0002932456,0.0010223706,0.00064601947,0.0007529541,0.00044136695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024586474,0.0002094496,0.7394756,0.0018087802,0.0010801065,0.00026335838,0.002926048,0.0015012757,0.0006680658,0.031050641,0.029145721,0.19162516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010694241,0.00008537596,0.9381359,0.0008890574,0.00024645642,0.00006136025,0.0015800627,0.00028482437,0.0003270346,0.0017415617,0.056618858,0.000018688923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035269573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06356098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035269573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000503873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071264594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07012856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558588987","doi":"10.1177/1091142117690437","title":"Replication of Goolsbee, Lovenheim, and Slemrod’s “Playing with Fire: Cigarettes, Taxes, and Competition from the Internet” ( <i>American Economic Journal: Economic Policy</i> , 2010)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Taxable income; Economics; Population; Spurious relationship; The Internet; Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Medicine; Environmental health; Accounting; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.037163657227588624,"score_gpt":0.24632599211522127,"score_spread":0.20916233488763264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558588987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.565402,0.010699274,0.0693529,0.1035168,0.012518265,0.006110677,0.023804735,0.001342522,0.20725286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90019006,0.002728583,0.040500477,0.02332434,0.0019121767,0.0024682567,0.0050091026,0.00052627054,0.023340762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98101,0.008378711,0.0010716423,0.0041839355,0.004893658,0.00046189633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8891916,0.036527775,0.009936131,0.045546025,0.017181797,0.0016165829],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033187646,0.00088500296,0.0014639546,0.0028684842,0.0019466968,0.003668298,0.0051371637,0.0017621875,0.014725327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12568702,0.0006115041,0.0037428273,0.0036055176,0.003334548,0.0037062347,0.0052621225,0.0037576694,0.0032100773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027481818,0.004051101,0.23960632,0.002579869,0.005884233,0.002035837,0.024832143,0.004762981,0.0037800607,0.23752287,0.21223652,0.25996003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028013259,0.003237136,0.3137148,0.002431992,0.003959287,0.00128709,0.021533603,0.009588922,0.007577619,0.14886235,0.48424464,0.0007612299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036262386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02453634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027114733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006448323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17551512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759033152","doi":"10.1177/1091142117730634","title":"Does Foundation Giving Stimulate or Suppress Private Giving? Evidence from a Panel of Canadian Charities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Liberian dollar; Public good; Crowding out; Welfare; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Crowds; Private information retrieval; Economics; Empirical research; Public relations; Political science; Law; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.18141243801513016,"score_gpt":0.3664704449252024,"score_spread":0.18505800691007226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759033152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90752345,0.021353917,0.00045927466,0.01192748,0.00013970146,0.0002538381,0.0017380465,0.000013072092,0.056591183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872803,0.0079797255,0.00022206515,0.0010120528,0.00004245599,0.000037196525,0.00044920854,0.000006742197,0.002970097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899492,0.003291335,0.0003023904,0.00075283344,0.0035080027,0.0021963073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566442,0.0126375435,0.00927336,0.0020081254,0.016245695,0.0031911482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593573,0.00033082414,0.0007573424,0.0025105546,0.004740394,0.0026198942,0.001694684,0.00089469703,0.0040695504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04487931,0.0002489613,0.00043528582,0.0057398365,0.0024686498,0.0008478089,0.001438099,0.00091087585,0.00025844984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016854447,0.00036847056,0.7003579,0.001849204,0.00089201605,0.00039535644,0.02973407,0.0007461103,0.0005643315,0.019203415,0.037641615,0.20656215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016062503,0.0001169485,0.92175275,0.00096569734,0.00049656036,0.000093022485,0.02200372,0.0003640771,0.00034914934,0.0016269257,0.05199966,0.000070907074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96371984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036280155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027055034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044266723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1962989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965732554","doi":"10.1177/1091142120960491","title":"Labor Supply, Taxation, and the Use of Tax Revenues: A Real-Effort Experiment in Canada, France, and Germany","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Economics; Redistribution (election); Tax revenue; Revenue; Indirect tax; Direct tax; Tax rate; Tax reform; Value-added tax; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05027346089567508,"score_gpt":0.29658044817861434,"score_spread":0.24630698728293926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965732554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99816054,0.00004853403,0.00024206364,0.00009321533,0.0000055182527,0.00009392403,0.00008445617,0.000006670582,0.0012650678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956726,0.00011990715,0.0011874352,0.00011582376,0.0000065881413,0.00017859519,0.00019975312,0.000005571344,0.00251363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870706,0.00049890886,0.00005302888,0.00017548288,0.00025615192,0.0003093627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994528,0.0032378219,0.00058550254,0.00043626217,0.00057348097,0.0006388515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034698893,0.00079585006,0.00086563616,0.00064878335,0.0020870653,0.001340231,0.0013466348,0.0013893653,0.0027893004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064391484,0.0003530966,0.00043097162,0.0007776453,0.0024416056,0.00086134864,0.00079842063,0.00083730614,0.00018361711],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061180614,0.10306423,0.33810073,0.0019835767,0.002542374,0.0026628852,0.024462065,0.12329896,0.08741066,0.07420256,0.019530423,0.1615609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013727232,0.03055884,0.7584895,0.00038879956,0.0013268201,0.00027902002,0.021382488,0.105043896,0.02084932,0.013566459,0.033572465,0.0008151492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6994706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8011788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30052942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01903525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6045986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967710951","doi":"10.1177/1091142119861352","title":"Poverty and Savings: Optimal Taxes with Endogenous Discount Factors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Consumption (sociology); Discounting; Valuation (finance); Poverty; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Public economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04366687929547513,"score_gpt":0.2051232855347908,"score_spread":0.16145640623931568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967710951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5145419,0.006592375,0.41718167,0.008045604,0.00024094802,0.0002150318,0.0005653702,0.00012998834,0.052487142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966665,0.0028811556,0.02124051,0.00022397935,0.000070940965,0.00006342445,0.00008003057,0.000033770226,0.008741168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935824,0.0003341442,0.00002149071,0.000084406434,0.00005172516,0.00015005776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842834,0.0009448538,0.0003114899,0.000087643675,0.00012284763,0.00010487163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020932497,0.00077666773,0.001294815,0.00057805266,0.00048134793,0.0024168957,0.00087324576,0.001232651,0.0033614505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007140334,0.0006215652,0.0008936879,0.00069565396,0.0017679723,0.0030391277,0.0011203075,0.0017698836,0.00023093987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001794313,0.00014556546,0.0016371765,0.00013234837,0.00007158573,0.0001420461,0.00013741228,0.4400539,0.0006943897,0.54235965,0.001471251,0.012975339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009536603,0.00006106785,0.00089055486,0.00009185748,0.000065102366,0.00006549231,0.00015506354,0.58314556,0.00040466888,0.41199404,0.0030048331,0.000026436064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010972154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00628677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010972154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038379799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020159762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027846575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994382771","doi":"10.1177/1091142119890369","title":"Social Discount Rates for Seventeen Latin American Countries: Theory and Parameter Estimation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Estimation; Economics; Social discount rate; Econometrics; Development economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Political science","score_opus":0.06876530386791381,"score_gpt":0.2826520086393483,"score_spread":0.2138867047714345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994382771","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44319963,0.007920208,0.49207544,0.0016146806,0.00015547947,0.00037374103,0.0031132184,0.00034709187,0.05120052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.894958,0.0063932007,0.092534855,0.00008314316,0.00006373209,0.0003711447,0.0022811654,0.00007194899,0.0032428282],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894565,0.00057984685,0.000077583085,0.000115478135,0.00019722366,0.00008420375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275583,0.004633486,0.0012115816,0.00044553744,0.0008655109,0.00008803971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006601253,0.0007214033,0.00064974837,0.0032989255,0.0004449518,0.0025971443,0.0010342933,0.0005409275,0.0027768656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019664368,0.0004333563,0.0011843414,0.0038280897,0.0007762789,0.002197869,0.0012861829,0.0016831966,0.00028988766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002483777,0.000114034665,0.11893708,0.0005083376,0.0004436434,0.0004684012,0.0016456321,0.3597869,0.0005743445,0.2826855,0.0063908994,0.22819674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010746062,0.0001893535,0.052955776,0.0010329105,0.00030999657,0.0005219245,0.0031082206,0.68303794,0.0019088894,0.21270531,0.043878403,0.00024381386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013545242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00762183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013545242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024001626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010582308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034911215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121672249","doi":"10.1177/1091142109345263","title":"The Efficiency Loss of Capital Income Taxation under Imperfect Loss Offset Provisions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Deadweight loss; Offset (computer science); Monetary economics; Liberian dollar; Welfare; Imperfect; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Public economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.025261131740019108,"score_gpt":0.24466806459383092,"score_spread":0.2194069328538118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121672249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8690332,0.0012211795,0.070250414,0.0010016765,0.00007242661,0.00007247912,0.00016845923,0.00011418475,0.058065888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964981,0.00017954214,0.0015833783,0.00002727791,0.000007163551,0.000007700086,0.000016696533,0.000011719927,0.0016683147],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988248,0.00043771183,0.000052507614,0.00009462112,0.00026469285,0.00032571625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468285,0.0030200107,0.0010511199,0.000746392,0.00039002497,0.000109588866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030740527,0.000372038,0.00076488,0.0004924151,0.00044602528,0.002701396,0.0007549465,0.0007591857,0.002417902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013963088,0.00027036882,0.00055120845,0.0006099188,0.0018872747,0.0028721744,0.0014995071,0.0010248305,0.00032426364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008502246,0.0001640434,0.008660889,0.00019840423,0.000115511,0.0008568048,0.00032264856,0.5459863,0.004759736,0.39764345,0.0014031049,0.039038934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119905446,0.00049225974,0.015335534,0.000145368,0.00016185887,0.0006595895,0.00075525005,0.5858223,0.0070606726,0.38499954,0.0043684808,0.000079175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023564266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096690806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030740527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002343061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012549673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017000139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121913983","doi":"10.1177/1091142116679728","title":"The Politics of Checkbook Federalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Politics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Constitution; Revenue; Public economics; Political science; Decentralization; Law; Finance; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.03138046514157087,"score_gpt":0.3051683766290523,"score_spread":0.2737879114874814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121913983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1259808,0.020662282,0.0032652922,0.06542915,0.00072181853,0.000047169677,0.0010080704,0.0002022039,0.7826832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94938624,0.0033034189,0.0005446136,0.0052046287,0.00027863108,0.000018805797,0.00020371248,0.00004174055,0.041018113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970579,0.0005298478,0.00004522881,0.00036637785,0.001070419,0.00093009725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575555,0.001264718,0.00037662976,0.00039666946,0.0016965141,0.0005099315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004159618,0.00013739604,0.0002705225,0.0025206641,0.004493416,0.0051372247,0.0008824003,0.0010334163,0.0061213975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009835352,0.00018572058,0.00019950111,0.002397195,0.0050852792,0.0016248983,0.001210717,0.0021354905,0.00036293018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031919484,0.000006276981,0.0024690393,0.00002924452,0.00001068756,0.0000325591,0.00084283884,0.00033632803,0.00008937054,0.94281566,0.028042376,0.025293661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057986035,0.000030426136,0.053310983,0.00032584363,0.000036070167,0.00006332848,0.0017600013,0.0010535097,0.0006370541,0.09940753,0.8432617,0.00005549496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7435073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80012447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034619283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025878688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5160064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387576026","doi":"10.1177/10911421231204651","title":"Between Election Rivalry and the Agency Costs of Government: The Effectiveness of Party Competition Across Indian States, 1957–2018","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Competition (biology); Economics; Ex-ante; Agency (philosophy); Margin (machine learning); Government (linguistics); Politics; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04252961653611543,"score_gpt":0.3553463882874271,"score_spread":0.3128167717513117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387576026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521387,0.00023005695,0.000090246125,0.00017505648,0.0000029645641,0.0000045411043,0.00026483863,0.0000022868408,0.0040161675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960023,0.00004440879,0.000015553935,0.000006685799,0.000005952873,0.0000016149157,0.00011978636,7.125916e-7,0.00020506959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998804,0.00028342934,0.00010045813,0.00016034162,0.0002686884,0.00038305516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871186,0.0048100743,0.0056217876,0.0005802994,0.0011527038,0.000716569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016790095,0.00009847543,0.00025215308,0.0015953365,0.0007341107,0.0015457474,0.0004906193,0.0002534423,0.0021453246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008696951,0.00012562468,0.00033700437,0.0034012515,0.0014995442,0.0007072985,0.0013079247,0.00079400855,0.00014382583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109220375,0.000028396567,0.98829865,0.000022110462,0.00008834288,0.00007108163,0.0009160534,0.0009301207,0.00014491126,0.0029664582,0.00032811312,0.006096548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012315246,0.000014761062,0.9980605,0.0000043190053,0.000012774537,0.000027208716,0.0006219345,0.00031480435,0.00005340897,0.00019178636,0.00069374783,0.0000034250115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059152264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102292605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059152264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025429633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009346509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11761594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388733545","doi":"10.1177/10911421231212354","title":"Property Tax Regressivity, the Case of Québec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Finance Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Economics; Property tax; Distributive property; Consumption (sociology); Property (philosophy); Value-added tax; Capital (architecture); Indirect tax; Ad valorem tax; Consumption tax; Tax reform; Public economics; Double taxation; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.08895440195667276,"score_gpt":0.2618959422492774,"score_spread":0.17294154029260467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388733545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6956653,0.016619274,0.0036154988,0.019806005,0.00015078289,0.0001347272,0.0054531153,0.00012409121,0.2584312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793171,0.0023935353,0.00047913546,0.00046356616,0.00002341885,0.000017574333,0.00049262337,0.000013118832,0.016799906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911946,0.0001402605,0.000026681051,0.0001243628,0.00023244222,0.00035670196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817276,0.00032918388,0.0002906232,0.0001318825,0.0009301924,0.00014549152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086542877,0.0002659908,0.00036784896,0.001563467,0.0030291723,0.0036199598,0.0010582685,0.0007362408,0.004811901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031125173,0.0001874561,0.00047202062,0.0030844912,0.00184515,0.0013171284,0.0007980665,0.0015575843,0.00019780778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002068247,0.000110214496,0.12305906,0.00025156443,0.00026011415,0.0030426627,0.004700748,0.016947927,0.0007136081,0.77404034,0.024422355,0.052244514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098487966,0.00010249355,0.60869336,0.0008328928,0.00036302427,0.0013114032,0.012260063,0.042539064,0.001158924,0.056558177,0.2758511,0.0002309155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99183184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99025035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055388104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055388104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40187073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}