{"meta":{"query_hash":"f32878505816","filters":{"venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f32878505816","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Opinion+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2024364466","doi":"10.1086/378963","title":"The International Economy and Presidential Approval","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Public opinion; Library science; Public administration; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.040194931960415514,"score_gpt":0.32763023993735196,"score_spread":0.28743530797693645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024364466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6025794,0.0020375112,0.0011866351,0.013778055,0.00025529673,0.000022762422,0.00021501955,0.000032586482,0.37989268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969234,0.00028648248,0.00006988185,0.00024040666,0.00016904998,0.0000056371864,0.00005167197,0.000007182989,0.002246331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995795,0.0022566537,0.00019371723,0.00026055324,0.0008025827,0.0006914672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97580916,0.009702991,0.00765113,0.0007981406,0.0034386741,0.0025999434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004072301,0.00017184972,0.0003073279,0.0018609681,0.0014341173,0.004493934,0.00019546977,0.00094517367,0.013021839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024403045,0.00011479383,0.00017868348,0.0018291945,0.0022628994,0.0012379439,0.0014749448,0.0011597307,0.0010784648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007285141,0.00043795153,0.5212381,0.0003558138,0.00023544402,0.0007578607,0.020882204,0.0010317516,0.0020054546,0.26931956,0.035882976,0.14712435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007108218,0.00021116562,0.84439725,0.0001913325,0.00006131437,0.0005252036,0.013201785,0.0010276322,0.00063851324,0.044852044,0.09476625,0.00005641648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010889247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015502467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013021839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008974091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048310938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043562353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050649007","doi":"10.1086/320040","title":"Validation of Time-of-Voting-Decision Recall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Voting; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.020783210723156822,"score_gpt":0.2625400784675149,"score_spread":0.24175686774435812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050649007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83362323,0.0012181873,0.12239851,0.0013519804,0.0008571552,0.0012328072,0.006052433,0.00091717567,0.032348588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98337126,0.00009560764,0.010286424,0.00040807438,0.00016333837,0.00045602504,0.0029944496,0.00018518248,0.002039794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91820925,0.050057214,0.005724445,0.008134091,0.016216693,0.0016583174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.390903,0.45138893,0.037464265,0.08080837,0.037508205,0.001927322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07297919,0.00082498713,0.0012845345,0.0017465799,0.0010862361,0.0027160328,0.0024214585,0.0023057053,0.0036561885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4196818,0.00042433594,0.0009203395,0.002020123,0.0021023063,0.002156681,0.0026374187,0.001922437,0.0018947853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016409583,0.0017388345,0.6838847,0.0009469861,0.0022279997,0.00043293418,0.0046726717,0.031818375,0.008009761,0.031099323,0.01762219,0.2011367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017819735,0.005314549,0.53806794,0.0005640982,0.0013360438,0.0018281103,0.002006343,0.24973221,0.058979888,0.06224238,0.07773996,0.00040648796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025305287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015667866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07297919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013236363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015230123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38595545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098478814","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfh042","title":"The Polls in the 2002 French Presidential Election: An Autopsy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Presidential system; Prime minister; Presidential election; Political science; National election; General election; Front (military); Shock (circulatory); Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.043019244535967546,"score_gpt":0.3559846864333282,"score_spread":0.31296544189736064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098478814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4399335,0.023951963,0.0050780526,0.18956125,0.0049330695,0.0002714314,0.0049395803,0.0003127368,0.3310184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050859,0.0059104674,0.0012141911,0.029827513,0.003528004,0.00019019624,0.0016111151,0.00023250323,0.05240001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862802,0.006576564,0.00048457595,0.00089318777,0.0033810548,0.0023844498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96191406,0.0201297,0.004580139,0.0034507401,0.008650116,0.0012753775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023782458,0.0003770733,0.00038708773,0.005972786,0.005886806,0.006777335,0.0013153958,0.0040259585,0.005436423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058599472,0.0007132881,0.0007397379,0.0038631342,0.003939357,0.0037833003,0.0020540338,0.003151559,0.0013348025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012375639,0.00026613873,0.18166988,0.00069836,0.00036583788,0.005086063,0.08705581,0.0004302233,0.0011267501,0.2068841,0.28537592,0.22980337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064120504,0.00017128128,0.21138772,0.00075283204,0.00014057982,0.0017724215,0.024018774,0.0005751777,0.0019068306,0.0052867825,0.75380564,0.00011779964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15594503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124009185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15594503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006398596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039771306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105257747","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft024","title":"Do Attitudes about Immigration Predict Willingness to Admit Individual Immigrants?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Library science; Political science; Government (linguistics); Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037170631078214146,"score_gpt":0.33908461162086784,"score_spread":0.30191398054265367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105257747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988682,0.00004580108,0.00003485576,0.00018597796,0.000017028344,0.000003389503,0.000074802476,0.0000011056218,0.00076892105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990693,0.00006663555,0.000050437393,0.0000908229,0.000024859071,0.0000071830896,0.00018327842,0.0000017799056,0.00050576957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999171,0.00030435857,0.00007372702,0.00015249141,0.0001527199,0.00014572954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777455,0.0046751956,0.0040072086,0.0008577101,0.00074467214,0.0019407388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020430447,0.00024961637,0.00029423193,0.0007013662,0.0006869998,0.0012798858,0.00042087582,0.0011839297,0.0043566884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010822751,0.00023548177,0.0007157162,0.00069015886,0.00064473273,0.0009859909,0.0009784121,0.0014643673,0.00061953097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097394426,0.0001391108,0.99730337,0.000005874067,0.00008511516,0.000024902281,0.000351704,0.00005225901,0.000049042916,0.00007836789,0.00014233554,0.0016705771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007516265,0.00008869523,0.99774027,0.000008906416,0.000046407233,0.000038117127,0.001244636,0.00037884247,0.000052609055,0.00016906139,0.00021522657,0.000009635165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051498665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006108904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051498665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026319668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036259127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014574528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109371943","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfp051","title":"The Dynamics of Party Identification Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Dynamics (music); Public opinion; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.056491912944454874,"score_gpt":0.35551577851633526,"score_spread":0.2990238655718804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109371943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93888134,0.00029853918,0.0428953,0.0023255812,0.000033743614,0.000030260997,0.00022104094,0.000055188342,0.015259077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749774,0.000053160864,0.0014246769,0.00004139817,0.000011436196,0.000008736675,0.000054560598,0.0000070489427,0.00090121984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962476,0.0020776147,0.000116608266,0.0008444425,0.00034416438,0.0003695184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98289526,0.009972367,0.0032407122,0.002786915,0.0006749353,0.0004299218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00589515,0.00016519266,0.0006203088,0.0009439511,0.0015878751,0.0037460558,0.0011456644,0.0010028181,0.004669143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030060172,0.00039649924,0.00050901214,0.0014777494,0.0025327648,0.00601382,0.0021902618,0.0021042118,0.0004922309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004787806,0.0001465831,0.2816646,0.00010276454,0.00018870259,0.00034758693,0.01207413,0.036246423,0.001364403,0.5612055,0.0016615166,0.10451899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006395176,0.0001782399,0.15113768,0.000094392424,0.00010551366,0.0005764316,0.0070784297,0.27144963,0.0011131415,0.55847645,0.009620157,0.0001060191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005017378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061599533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00589515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015432208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008517685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031176925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125193835","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft039","title":"Polling and Democracy: Executive Summary of the AAPOR Task Force Report on Public Opinion and Leadership","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Public relations; Conviction; Political science; Democracy; Task (project management); Politics; Polling; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3855075452714246,"score_gpt":0.38480326864355324,"score_spread":0.0007042766278713697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125193835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035092058,0.12263373,0.006830277,0.37573233,0.14818789,0.005940471,0.08644045,0.0015523467,0.24917336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03553799,0.22420257,0.015831001,0.102169216,0.07543808,0.015845148,0.11148788,0.002249257,0.4172388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98455274,0.0026329868,0.0013257052,0.00090992905,0.008558788,0.0020198268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662013,0.006458213,0.004311491,0.0013287755,0.018429479,0.003270626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022327336,0.0025959439,0.0017561995,0.0054992875,0.0030283676,0.009959347,0.0045901537,0.010125889,0.020241247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036532417,0.0013196982,0.0016612967,0.009503422,0.0013566647,0.0042715655,0.0038303907,0.007232921,0.024617208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028239403,0.000036353114,0.00039625715,0.00039039363,0.000008398137,0.00002288498,0.00007082926,0.00013455753,0.0000533742,0.0013900658,0.977182,0.02028658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021955952,0.000023687553,0.004218581,0.0014957151,0.000017763961,0.000021301472,0.00020931433,0.0001145824,0.00010042676,0.0011926024,0.99255353,0.000030469857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09600933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048212323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09600933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060573556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036480412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19090098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140450198","doi":"10.1086/318640","title":"Do People Have Feelings Toward Leaders about Whom They Say They Know Nothing?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Feeling; Library science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04150776594936123,"score_gpt":0.3377974987260428,"score_spread":0.2962897327766816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140450198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47850615,0.0393314,0.0005134084,0.35446426,0.0060481625,0.000037832444,0.00037735968,0.00003290653,0.120688505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353099,0.01792598,0.00019248827,0.033843424,0.0014101114,0.000033593496,0.00012991161,0.000020568219,0.011134047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990522,0.0004111776,0.00003145186,0.000043313506,0.00035888798,0.000103032115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506027,0.0014317166,0.0011743725,0.00012058395,0.0011231779,0.001089805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227673,0.00018976681,0.00024290099,0.000533733,0.0023056956,0.003059602,0.00028648294,0.0016019609,0.006596187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013333753,0.00020699108,0.00019293666,0.00043803325,0.0020869183,0.0022523499,0.0010899076,0.0023874433,0.001310738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006807199,0.0003642764,0.40501848,0.0006116473,0.00019979061,0.0004791242,0.07352552,0.00007666273,0.0014283016,0.0139793325,0.2933102,0.21032594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014076245,0.0004280264,0.5756478,0.0010598308,0.00019699374,0.0011712811,0.24684681,0.00022088073,0.00076505647,0.012555185,0.1608862,0.00008113189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035656234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058761835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006596187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006393745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022066414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147872545","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfn017","title":"Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":446,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homosexuality; Public opinion; Cohort; Demography; Politics; Attitude change; Cohort effect; Psychology; General Social Survey; Cohort study; Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.09422929284971764,"score_gpt":0.321792967793562,"score_spread":0.22756367494384433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147872545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945874,0.0004325179,0.00003461643,0.00027896973,0.000010652686,0.000014207612,0.00276512,0.0000052603573,0.0018711289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951432,0.000620233,0.000070044574,0.00007075481,0.0000072108746,0.0000086099735,0.0024727308,0.0000031601367,0.0016040986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.000037660182,0.000027115653,0.00006641185,0.00022050453,0.00023773973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966568,0.00019864102,0.0007612569,0.0000798191,0.0013288184,0.00097478286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089349033,0.00023279335,0.00028464114,0.0021809808,0.0021569366,0.0012784712,0.00075491983,0.0004161879,0.0019404292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026927858,0.00018045197,0.00039927533,0.004258255,0.00061519595,0.00041424463,0.00076022855,0.00084101636,0.00026120726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008181273,0.000033864457,0.99131835,0.000019150964,0.000037866077,0.000036909696,0.0021274,0.00007912701,0.00012192061,0.0001083703,0.0008925025,0.0051428764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013353625,0.000008418297,0.9980749,0.0000070606056,0.0000054705806,0.000010694853,0.0012213417,0.000051337054,0.000031746633,0.000007024003,0.00057656947,0.0000041163257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98814315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99421376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012876747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012876747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012162927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09342778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154529659","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfi002","title":"Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":935,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Non-response bias; Quarter (Canadian coin); Telephone survey; Response bias; Psychology; Perception; Demography; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Social psychology; Geography; Economics; Advertising; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.14005562517633982,"score_gpt":0.39966426755399675,"score_spread":0.2596086423776569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154529659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8334332,0.010199615,0.030384058,0.07821428,0.005739103,0.00039260255,0.014690914,0.00068665773,0.026259456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92524827,0.005014654,0.015671004,0.029964386,0.0024042635,0.00093154545,0.007971355,0.00042154468,0.012373049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.952589,0.025311926,0.0069585727,0.0050650914,0.008307978,0.0017674373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8565441,0.0517691,0.046630796,0.016547268,0.026431663,0.0020771313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04877676,0.00033763176,0.00060676347,0.0037301853,0.0013510842,0.0020221889,0.0016554411,0.0017199634,0.004468953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1692907,0.0005034714,0.0005101964,0.007841122,0.00090177025,0.0022160343,0.0017786565,0.0018512697,0.0020017799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030248237,0.00016414869,0.67463964,0.001458433,0.00020324707,0.00047826857,0.015703484,0.00077828794,0.0019557502,0.008481419,0.067898706,0.2279362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021706735,0.00020366104,0.8169756,0.0004469933,0.00008320519,0.0010393574,0.0042312546,0.0018244927,0.0025259182,0.0014108514,0.17115264,0.00008437841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010245023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016379647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95122325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002871041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018692866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25795925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165992382","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft042","title":"Coding Voter Turnout Responses in the Current Population Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Politics; Democracy; Population; Citizenship; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Voting; Demography","score_opus":0.12068156517723279,"score_gpt":0.397223798644595,"score_spread":0.27654223346736223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165992382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.858576,0.0008798555,0.009236064,0.002329596,0.00065256737,0.0017878232,0.090578936,0.00036778624,0.035591274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93423176,0.00063704624,0.007456453,0.00068252365,0.00016586797,0.0036749071,0.04454365,0.000121663295,0.008486068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893686,0.00555086,0.001279012,0.0007217526,0.002564674,0.00051521003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97281903,0.0105046155,0.00497357,0.0029309774,0.008183016,0.0005888271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068938513,0.0002937431,0.00043752018,0.005473997,0.0005595928,0.0010769428,0.00079660123,0.00065409415,0.0047236253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056718934,0.00035041472,0.0003837133,0.009650002,0.00048570806,0.0009687962,0.0015134419,0.00065572787,0.0030748844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042720963,0.00011778852,0.7421084,0.0010134807,0.00022566438,0.00023747486,0.011428673,0.0013450263,0.0013347475,0.0031223802,0.12923972,0.109399304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051448293,0.00011191523,0.92688143,0.000416636,0.000076715434,0.00016678961,0.011446832,0.0024484603,0.00089388894,0.001797383,0.05560902,0.000099384575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024209699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029079856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024209699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009621685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096947205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048137605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272783963","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfv054","title":"Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conference Board of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Interpersonal communication; Salient; Ethnic group; Politics; Contact theory; Population; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.056723173056157525,"score_gpt":0.3450844534490306,"score_spread":0.28836128039287307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272783963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99530894,0.000051907093,0.00002381462,0.00021263892,0.0000027654005,0.0000019011793,0.0000060521365,6.329355e-7,0.0043914034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996742,0.000055912154,0.000012926697,0.000023089799,0.000004366376,0.0000017778998,0.00000738795,4.4462294e-7,0.00021990763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991333,0.0004934838,0.000021596808,0.00004688625,0.00013404003,0.00017076817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573463,0.001892554,0.0014067151,0.00015902583,0.00018159812,0.0006254941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016282272,0.00012002701,0.00015318772,0.00062265527,0.0013264896,0.0016930988,0.0001509603,0.00039837463,0.00552744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052695787,0.00010022998,0.00013515376,0.0005248874,0.0013057714,0.0007125237,0.0015458255,0.0006068824,0.00022805504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001472615,0.0004317191,0.97141594,0.000024917677,0.000050861643,0.00015170702,0.012286383,0.00016694251,0.00041243003,0.0031165555,0.000371815,0.011423518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008189868,0.00008928903,0.96916616,0.000035003453,0.000021576769,0.000055600405,0.028195625,0.00021346362,0.00012777786,0.00081872597,0.0012622154,0.000006373472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037095007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00966761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00552744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005388028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003734996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01849109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346942379","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfw016","title":"Cross-National Trends in Religious Service Attendance: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Library science; Service (business); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04319358314710601,"score_gpt":0.38031162809284097,"score_spread":0.33711804494573494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346942379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7923552,0.009756442,0.0006770382,0.0024616155,0.00016821237,0.00006281287,0.15157366,0.00024406509,0.04270096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201468,0.004705394,0.00079612195,0.00034797378,0.00007507046,0.00006873765,0.060852274,0.00007003358,0.012937509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962044,0.000065892025,0.000050556646,0.00009339334,0.00010364936,0.00006600725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964734,0.00087491,0.001135786,0.00020385167,0.0010687085,0.00024341095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006912974,0.00016696086,0.00024197593,0.0020223255,0.00035762516,0.00067702355,0.00042422893,0.00025476437,0.016989356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035368672,0.000119812146,0.00046537808,0.004257984,0.00016562878,0.0007785351,0.0007460845,0.0005672819,0.0024275768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010767385,0.000029225816,0.9299842,0.00054515654,0.0002618223,0.000086614054,0.0011035022,0.0002091303,0.0004266539,0.0011504472,0.021775752,0.044319812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001365246,0.000019503901,0.9896025,0.000059259466,0.0000366726,0.00010292816,0.00087242527,0.00009628103,0.000073135205,0.00007009077,0.009061991,0.000003929635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029869644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0513108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029869644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047793976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005688898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461902677","doi":"10.1086/320041","title":"The Polls—Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025126213952517164,"score_gpt":0.2868048499672095,"score_spread":0.2616786360146923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461902677","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023238652,0.99420553,0.000016315556,0.003093959,0.0019794896,0.000016312182,0.000095070514,0.000005311976,0.0005647876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079480466,0.9926684,0.000051209798,0.0043659224,0.0014069594,0.000037521597,0.00009783637,0.000004668692,0.00057271664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994207,0.0016573591,0.00090298307,0.0006904606,0.0020785471,0.00046351663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976703,0.009945499,0.0027162167,0.0006483944,0.008703465,0.0012835107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00889207,0.0011853889,0.0043213526,0.0055432315,0.001195421,0.003952592,0.0030080846,0.004532371,0.008310652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041640606,0.0011251903,0.0013071066,0.009168089,0.002036426,0.0028530876,0.0014959374,0.003634624,0.00349215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015565599,0.000024022693,0.00036352058,0.04289254,0.0003397057,0.0000748644,0.00010065453,0.000079371304,0.00005931718,0.0015718681,0.6617084,0.2926301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008427659,0.00003253251,0.0021101402,0.0504791,0.00036937342,0.00015844051,0.0001233663,0.000017754373,0.000034052246,0.00042108767,0.9461441,0.000025754729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11309602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2246969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11309602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009381482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031058049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22487545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793769061","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfx047","title":"An Evaluation of the 2016 Election Polls in the United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Polling; Presidential system; Opinion poll; Political science; Presidential election; Public opinion; Turnout; Voting; Preference; Public administration; Psychology; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3219762045230792,"score_gpt":0.49870578518667097,"score_spread":0.1767295806635918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793769061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94799256,0.0006851489,0.0016078237,0.0027578236,0.001569466,0.00070698815,0.0041797836,0.00025852353,0.040241867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967473,0.00057453936,0.003055568,0.0011845927,0.0006876684,0.0006811012,0.012095244,0.00019702817,0.014051169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724578,0.012445476,0.0019339547,0.0013724429,0.01041565,0.0013746581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9204004,0.034711536,0.0065834867,0.004878152,0.02950199,0.003924461],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05266378,0.0005113559,0.00094528164,0.0020622124,0.0016836117,0.0026924198,0.0007519919,0.00090605067,0.003062792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10343005,0.00048448134,0.0010375575,0.0030428027,0.0008432889,0.0018722357,0.0020214713,0.0012764753,0.0018536478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010210259,0.0038783369,0.46087328,0.0014369594,0.00086021726,0.0005031144,0.01098246,0.0075110137,0.0041205385,0.0068422183,0.15392308,0.33885843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057758694,0.0035563523,0.8647869,0.0002426664,0.00019791957,0.00011198923,0.007962783,0.008067202,0.0028666481,0.0007911627,0.110692225,0.00014639283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02858779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06679884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029271983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026325139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27851605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974511225","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfl007","title":"Annual Membership Meeting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Associate editor; Management; Cliff; Vice president; Executive director; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.033215051964732054,"score_gpt":0.3070115638762204,"score_spread":0.27379651191148835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974511225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017105059,0.014573487,0.0019952017,0.07427161,0.11570622,0.0008316179,0.007924502,0.00084188464,0.78214496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013240691,0.015920775,0.002464085,0.018127771,0.03677452,0.0014291767,0.00850869,0.0005298305,0.90300447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655724,0.0004912334,0.00023586648,0.00039820315,0.0017721419,0.00054538174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987465,0.0005682557,0.00049430365,0.00044870898,0.008485181,0.0025385579],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048887962,0.0010052598,0.0007609458,0.0023874661,0.002832414,0.0061449492,0.0014692317,0.0034441003,0.3205051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011124536,0.00033840435,0.0006907952,0.0017624267,0.0004082299,0.0029133346,0.0025587366,0.0033059162,0.23936099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001427559,0.000018739462,0.0001960474,0.00007451581,0.0000023403707,0.00001856335,0.000023707613,0.000004728017,0.00007688383,0.0005025367,0.9620504,0.037017263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003507361,0.000007344432,0.00085194386,0.000082347964,0.00000273373,0.000023435307,0.0000614505,0.000013011845,0.000022586291,0.0002080482,0.9987205,0.0000031065556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033501084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051824874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67949486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018340538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006631265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005146891","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfz048","title":"Follow the (ISSUE) Leader? The Leader-Led Nexus Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Generalizability theory; Priming (agriculture); Voting; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Test (biology); Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Politics; Law; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06097321714158251,"score_gpt":0.3414881944304853,"score_spread":0.2805149772889028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005146891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8453819,0.0011257534,0.0027301428,0.023644198,0.00011744486,0.00008814722,0.000577729,0.000030222862,0.12630445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965785,0.00010367252,0.00014376453,0.00041498308,0.000033715045,0.000011013955,0.00005789471,0.000005640086,0.0026508472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966497,0.0013060785,0.000083110055,0.00057497324,0.0006320796,0.00075405306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781212,0.013503781,0.0031358448,0.00085084187,0.0025967753,0.0017914503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006290537,0.0001671622,0.00078362395,0.0015522498,0.0035257314,0.0052323425,0.0010725469,0.0013898569,0.018479008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023055118,0.00014053559,0.00024497794,0.0022418534,0.0028101492,0.002549098,0.0019051905,0.0025088582,0.0012567041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007212935,0.00046881646,0.5787453,0.0003630518,0.0001901716,0.0013231569,0.054238033,0.001364067,0.0008834802,0.2534363,0.019934297,0.08833197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002222208,0.00019459435,0.6518475,0.00042556203,0.000214238,0.00022568389,0.11552316,0.008552257,0.0013682501,0.11855297,0.10280542,0.000068250105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15681873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20112029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15681873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063159685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00499421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31181192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008539663","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfz053","title":"Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forces College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectualism; Ideology; Elite; Opposition (politics); Populism; Rhetoric; Politics; Salient; Political science; Social psychology; Mainstream; Sociology; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2848221792204148,"score_gpt":0.41754435645234256,"score_spread":0.13272217723192775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008539663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905178,0.000048102003,0.0002977861,0.00045218496,0.00000820751,0.000009172534,0.000008962035,0.0000028845684,0.008654878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997104,0.00001816771,0.00006537024,0.00007548496,0.0000097933635,0.0000038137448,0.0000051337606,0.000001356104,0.000110475936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995624,0.0025997218,0.00015705841,0.00029045477,0.0010313584,0.00029745075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94075394,0.03679869,0.016069071,0.0018387622,0.002791635,0.0017478638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004891095,0.00018218256,0.00024074383,0.0012637314,0.0010366496,0.0024824834,0.0002766615,0.0009668445,0.0039750915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033247598,0.00019354025,0.00021650834,0.0006276958,0.0024958004,0.00086453866,0.0013604466,0.0013835324,0.00020486095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009546759,0.0010880356,0.83386534,0.00030704707,0.0003332993,0.0008053335,0.07961382,0.0009299675,0.012802856,0.01908518,0.0018456291,0.048368823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009340241,0.00041080522,0.9447765,0.00011250482,0.00007149891,0.00037839627,0.03258462,0.003112232,0.0016763353,0.012927658,0.0037911078,0.000064952845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011311728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00107215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004891095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078000396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004358576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025866926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035161100","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaa017","title":"Reinforcement Effects between Digital Media Use and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Repeated-Wave Panel Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; MacEwan University","keywords":"Panel data; Leverage (statistics); Reinforcement; Politics; Globe; Political efficacy; Digital media; Panel analysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43057688374534697,"score_gpt":0.3939282830590794,"score_spread":0.036648600686267574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035161100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17606051,0.7853035,0.025986996,0.0019713354,0.0011475319,0.0012681565,0.0056234887,0.00022565879,0.0024129085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262833,0.059776176,0.008914105,0.00094668654,0.00031615334,0.0011718174,0.002120531,0.000087934386,0.00038329675],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.95804495,0.030736415,0.0048948103,0.0035605577,0.002288566,0.00047467815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.789753,0.17644228,0.01610943,0.01171644,0.0052404483,0.00073844846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05847664,0.0014097005,0.0050892034,0.00430851,0.00052506285,0.0031333666,0.001860751,0.0014939472,0.0031559872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12636144,0.0011045014,0.021970078,0.0059752665,0.0010653726,0.0020191704,0.0016063581,0.0022022382,0.000285198],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015876316,0.00011072256,0.07474624,0.04170433,0.8608704,0.00011522068,0.000444399,0.00090351887,0.00036969554,0.0005107358,0.0009974111,0.01763962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095168,0.00081370986,0.07367633,0.010006226,0.9064913,0.00014104454,0.0004432677,0.0012849062,0.0007703393,0.0015714762,0.0042212536,0.000070560985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039651166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059196744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05847664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011469093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015966843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30925775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125853874","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfx034","title":"North American Public Opinion on Health and Smoking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Public health; Lung cancer; Polling; Environmental health; Smoke; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.07567155769854805,"score_gpt":0.35655549908318035,"score_spread":0.2808839413846323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125853874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080660954,0.086237036,0.00034126433,0.3473232,0.0057146796,0.000027959193,0.000684585,0.000040444036,0.47896984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7967134,0.09210636,0.00029890612,0.059082825,0.009521366,0.000062720064,0.0007453952,0.00002000313,0.041449092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978358,0.0008575989,0.00006692121,0.00009939454,0.00089881377,0.00024139277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949502,0.002247424,0.00063843373,0.00012749911,0.0015460304,0.0004903973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024829404,0.00015964182,0.0002252756,0.0013027585,0.001459123,0.002201623,0.0002462251,0.0020127324,0.013922639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006662506,0.00009649618,0.00022849403,0.001689639,0.0012466089,0.0012741619,0.00079634815,0.001270349,0.0010427852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020597193,0.00021009064,0.056731187,0.00090831716,0.00007989484,0.00066937465,0.017970819,0.00013824338,0.0011501291,0.047740508,0.5806463,0.2935491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023738343,0.00012504701,0.18661842,0.001136674,0.00006151787,0.00046027964,0.013828487,0.00014440449,0.00015110026,0.008546403,0.7888664,0.00003748896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018902166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024649993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018902166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021419963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020612068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046575844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173457332","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab006","title":"Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Polling; Context (archaeology); Variance (accounting); Opinion poll; Political science; Public opinion; Portrait; Social desirability bias; Demographic economics; Sociology; Social desirability; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Geography; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0922325599431251,"score_gpt":0.39714982053543496,"score_spread":0.30491726059230984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173457332","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008076576,0.85351515,0.0019252104,0.018840134,0.01336552,0.0004972011,0.00620108,0.00040116318,0.10444688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006974658,0.9148204,0.0020852848,0.012315001,0.005268005,0.0003884448,0.0057775066,0.0001756263,0.052195087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984989,0.00034942033,0.000270381,0.00022307763,0.0005187551,0.00013938159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624974,0.0013213691,0.00041925957,0.00024110309,0.0014766495,0.00029191512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015823231,0.0009178345,0.0017426552,0.0048945383,0.0007233653,0.0040482716,0.002350854,0.0022570824,0.1776545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120403515,0.0003510433,0.0013503111,0.005099932,0.0005636909,0.003198639,0.0020854312,0.0018741497,0.06817793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013861715,0.000051090876,0.00038136204,0.037758686,0.0001708267,0.00026926285,0.00019739967,0.0001725644,0.0003021991,0.006656387,0.49556592,0.4583358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015129363,0.000021418453,0.0004325345,0.015778441,0.00011329248,0.00033948448,0.00007866671,0.000020728594,0.00006338753,0.001358802,0.9817692,0.00000890157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034768097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038552408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002153947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007912909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199519442","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab034","title":"The Polls—Trends","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Dynamism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public opinion; Opinion poll; Politics; Political science; Perception; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.050065276729234234,"score_gpt":0.35287733798151977,"score_spread":0.30281206125228555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199519442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41335133,0.044206776,0.015821002,0.10588629,0.015356171,0.0014067532,0.11836971,0.0022591674,0.28334287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7764104,0.022784777,0.009812116,0.033235323,0.01217286,0.0017546219,0.080962874,0.0007877173,0.062079307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908343,0.003012598,0.0009541226,0.0014017466,0.0031469744,0.00065024965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510488,0.015269357,0.00907725,0.0033425535,0.019182326,0.002079746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012643578,0.00037750026,0.00048605356,0.0064910427,0.00089802494,0.0040021213,0.0008881641,0.0011110473,0.008206603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037442014,0.0004081176,0.00042573156,0.0109892385,0.00064192334,0.0030168435,0.0016220054,0.00169682,0.0043272763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042090553,0.00023206315,0.2421388,0.0019199991,0.00021907083,0.0001439306,0.0048432834,0.00031706295,0.0022926277,0.013670026,0.3781109,0.35569125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026162435,0.00024544366,0.387367,0.0007194928,0.000046095778,0.00018621741,0.0046120007,0.00072067976,0.0016640787,0.0014745774,0.6028875,0.0000508308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010522501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010558681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012643578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016354823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017075521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0668664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206313196","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab073","title":"Macropartisanship with Independents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Identification (biology); Politics; Political science; Erikson's stages of psychosocial development; Positive economics; Aggregate (composite); Variable (mathematics); Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06600991645779702,"score_gpt":0.35276033156736547,"score_spread":0.28675041510956845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206313196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88307405,0.00088650105,0.020003403,0.0025124499,0.00016990717,0.0000686451,0.0007971105,0.000117606105,0.09237037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971054,0.0000683645,0.0006184918,0.000060416616,0.00008884716,0.000016353271,0.00010247401,0.000017174552,0.0019226389],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966344,0.0012246687,0.000117654614,0.001144908,0.0004888918,0.0003894876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97471786,0.010273136,0.0060456754,0.0046512466,0.0018168596,0.0024952996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029126422,0.00032860434,0.0005803547,0.0018295523,0.0014137917,0.002559401,0.00046659313,0.00031462417,0.022226926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015971737,0.00021438205,0.00058927166,0.0021591985,0.004204513,0.0023946315,0.0036853154,0.001598289,0.0011563209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007652606,0.00036334453,0.4632301,0.00021828424,0.00047942981,0.00036913078,0.00967141,0.004699555,0.0024443262,0.42592776,0.0084589375,0.08337246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054477587,0.00026575764,0.59411573,0.00009681718,0.00016201986,0.0003310268,0.0032820902,0.013074957,0.0011313787,0.3566935,0.030716501,0.000075741096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001377244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022226926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010956425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030713752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0743565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212824481","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab069","title":"André Blais and Jean-François Daoust. <i>The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Duty; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05592024519677271,"score_gpt":0.2981189016552424,"score_spread":0.2421986564584697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212824481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028116656,0.2460649,0.02179753,0.56695706,0.011377799,0.00013263745,0.0019103346,0.0002647866,0.12337836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51200444,0.1867592,0.023340646,0.08447972,0.01155716,0.000573529,0.001553239,0.00040737458,0.17932469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990777,0.0004187941,0.00002706501,0.00015557173,0.00023920496,0.00008169597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995624,0.003183583,0.00032228843,0.00007295137,0.00058882334,0.00020838871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016118069,0.00073844125,0.00035440765,0.0015135155,0.001575602,0.002492557,0.000936145,0.0024724666,0.0108146425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00708276,0.0003369835,0.00053568324,0.001687088,0.0012846868,0.0030055845,0.0008846017,0.0021687835,0.0032569433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107971515,0.00013030237,0.012037555,0.00057210505,0.00006818438,0.00018937919,0.004685663,0.0009377146,0.0002695801,0.27958283,0.61230713,0.08911152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036444057,0.00004854837,0.02033381,0.00073087745,0.00004036348,0.00018770056,0.003963261,0.002518481,0.0007417325,0.12312588,0.8481915,0.0000813759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018480117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022262722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018480117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015384473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010509243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03674513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214945778","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac012","title":"Ready for a Woman President?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of California","keywords":"Nomination; Democracy; Political science; Public relations; Voting; Perception; Test (biology); Worry; Psychology; Social psychology; Public administration; Advertising; Law; Politics; Business; Anxiety","score_opus":0.09469295241178304,"score_gpt":0.3744122444100257,"score_spread":0.27971929199824264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214945778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95162416,0.0005662712,0.00096923835,0.0071350266,0.00043248932,0.000054607157,0.00022762359,0.000042243686,0.038948454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992673,0.00019270349,0.00026118898,0.0015939181,0.00012266244,0.000031641186,0.000059015845,0.000008753037,0.0050570765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988691,0.00069145794,0.0000541012,0.0001064908,0.00016603079,0.00011287514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387324,0.0033074662,0.0015032396,0.00035629794,0.00038059425,0.00057923107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019977307,0.00018403764,0.00027683884,0.00041023214,0.0013269559,0.0021005615,0.00013424095,0.00068751595,0.019193588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091726985,0.00015586846,0.00014784496,0.0002700424,0.00080060906,0.0010103283,0.0006645736,0.000977173,0.0022888419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036989376,0.0021263554,0.53424984,0.001030006,0.00026442565,0.0014560655,0.15411392,0.00037192943,0.023517814,0.021216098,0.044356655,0.21359798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034191247,0.0043037864,0.45866802,0.0005978325,0.00032808838,0.001645332,0.23678313,0.0022416722,0.010569463,0.00867022,0.27560997,0.00024046673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008976464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010722899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019193588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004860858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020797428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064208925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294278840","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac031","title":"Measuring Support for Women’s Political Leadership","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Interview; Spouse; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Perception; Social desirability bias; Public opinion; Social desirability; Political science","score_opus":0.23779167206244547,"score_gpt":0.35396387346209324,"score_spread":0.11617220139964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294278840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844639,0.00018679877,0.0005982688,0.00039305325,0.000019723006,0.00003839057,0.00032424793,0.0000047462368,0.01397089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981097,0.000117403884,0.00048746724,0.00006660469,0.000022214663,0.000056420784,0.00018487581,0.0000015171905,0.0009538321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826306,0.0009865467,0.0001221216,0.00010866797,0.00033585203,0.00018386114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938152,0.0024776757,0.0022602845,0.00026425614,0.0008185868,0.00036392393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034687154,0.00013515518,0.00014727117,0.0012184347,0.0005270356,0.00072428817,0.00021492134,0.00027680397,0.0059475326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011185909,0.00009354739,0.00015125351,0.0010206228,0.0003914463,0.00055696676,0.00056531583,0.00028351982,0.0006348278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012003847,0.000108294305,0.9419692,0.00007853979,0.000055119857,0.00007042479,0.00701507,0.000095329895,0.0011826674,0.0010919536,0.0015833621,0.046630006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011059398,0.00022006397,0.9794531,0.00004528817,0.000028039536,0.00017975389,0.011027898,0.00029974143,0.0009950579,0.0005319495,0.0071956813,0.00001250044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012355838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002903373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059475326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033085758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028097126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019896448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318765536","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac047","title":"Polarization Eh? Ideological Divergence and Partisan Sorting in the Canadian Mass Public","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Political economy; Public opinion; Sociology; Law; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08116095535041723,"score_gpt":0.3325489960296398,"score_spread":0.25138804067922255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318765536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92931175,0.00047978378,0.0002726737,0.0064093582,0.000037006448,0.00002011925,0.00096394727,0.0000130138205,0.06249233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985631,0.000114226794,0.000051042472,0.00011780003,0.00000643687,0.0000030354397,0.00012526744,0.0000025936517,0.0010165299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978846,0.00022693588,0.00003765428,0.00013131749,0.00077392656,0.0009454585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898397,0.0017745288,0.0012158345,0.00035722638,0.0057387776,0.0010740247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033652498,0.00013934386,0.00039009275,0.0047971993,0.0081919655,0.0037353616,0.0007716987,0.0004645776,0.006975191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013847992,0.00011273447,0.00023549661,0.007720276,0.0041734613,0.0012196266,0.0018974312,0.0011624785,0.00023010181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044067015,0.000057385518,0.7843029,0.00014101075,0.00007808234,0.00021961561,0.07357027,0.0006918277,0.0006719548,0.05419245,0.017380701,0.0682532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001145452,0.000017117782,0.8977833,0.00012323592,0.000024433884,0.000030077817,0.07533093,0.00059157703,0.0003270094,0.0035428319,0.022182528,0.00003536261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037363984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037363984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035434704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27109593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318765825","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac044","title":"Before the Party Hijacks: The Limited Role of Party Cues in Appraisal of Low-Salience Policies—Experimental Evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Public relations; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.055978679558881646,"score_gpt":0.37341105382506873,"score_spread":0.3174323742661871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318765825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924601,0.00017436761,0.00059441745,0.00018490665,0.000022396067,0.000064261796,0.000051879695,0.000004661057,0.006443041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761057,0.0001846722,0.0009331821,0.00033600643,0.000038548627,0.00010066619,0.00008238865,0.000010311618,0.000703727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958121,0.002671365,0.00020054371,0.0006234536,0.0004932954,0.00019932703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93713945,0.045179658,0.008706613,0.00641945,0.0013718205,0.0011829908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008089919,0.00032256902,0.00044973494,0.00031953547,0.0008282086,0.0021878683,0.0007348046,0.000981099,0.009308482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032143194,0.00049153675,0.0003482998,0.00038637526,0.002171338,0.0015786483,0.0013339454,0.0020382924,0.0008575382],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.090801455,0.095571406,0.37833768,0.0034766868,0.0024001244,0.0005935359,0.028274052,0.003049225,0.15955465,0.039485253,0.005274053,0.19318196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004146134,0.020688394,0.8818648,0.00059040246,0.0013842329,0.0003133529,0.012223265,0.0064486144,0.03098416,0.0295731,0.011546898,0.00023669636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018965283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020692775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009308482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045956322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005232662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042784095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376256284","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad012","title":"The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Turnout; Voting; Presidential election; Presidential system; Democracy; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Political action; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey data collection; Psychology; Panel survey; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.05873607098140151,"score_gpt":0.3964467472445019,"score_spread":0.3377106762631004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376256284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900503,0.00009368798,0.00028095287,0.0004960255,0.000013546434,0.000009293615,0.000039964616,0.0000022691167,0.009013916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994981,0.00004762432,0.000063116466,0.000061988954,0.000012469922,0.000004264786,0.000018771341,0.0000015184768,0.00029202746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980563,0.0013301737,0.00004372752,0.00013322632,0.00022284928,0.00021365474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760626,0.012278134,0.00669423,0.0013884522,0.0013854828,0.0021912002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032084652,0.0001792596,0.000300443,0.00041883622,0.00075552874,0.0014792553,0.000178255,0.00054575736,0.0061401078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154129565,0.00014236613,0.00030635198,0.0003859852,0.0011323182,0.0006663844,0.000743912,0.0009743826,0.0004455608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016802517,0.0013191226,0.945961,0.000100935824,0.00020017379,0.00014573874,0.0023848554,0.00034463487,0.0038785832,0.004737104,0.0008355506,0.038412046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023181763,0.00029284816,0.99203,0.00003250996,0.000062738436,0.00005959367,0.001959041,0.00056158326,0.0007027542,0.0032814941,0.0009825671,0.000011585527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010422386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016701055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061401078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042264242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031919352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020540714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392280840","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad062","title":"Trump Support Explains COVID-19 Health Behaviors in the United States","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science; Campbell Institute; McGill University; Dartmouth College; Sage Foundation; Russell Sage Foundation; Syracuse University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ideology; Charisma; Politics; Scholarship; Political economy; Public health; Sociology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.08382456209823981,"score_gpt":0.4085302871351871,"score_spread":0.3247057250369473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392280840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973425,0.00006998667,0.00009736054,0.00042576043,0.000011928152,0.0000052154087,0.00015642526,0.000002093864,0.0018887627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997204,0.000017696802,0.00002028399,0.000039547223,0.000008456656,0.0000022961187,0.00008871198,8.5516376e-7,0.00010166903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993273,0.00028537004,0.000025004749,0.00009858824,0.00007635824,0.00018737455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470705,0.0018728431,0.0016986183,0.00054947543,0.00041559892,0.00075641024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023119464,0.000123076,0.00026329706,0.0007448512,0.0011226059,0.00075737626,0.00028219007,0.0004403279,0.0036096708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059303385,0.00016273098,0.0002474201,0.00084000605,0.0005856786,0.0004465345,0.0010359278,0.0010931382,0.0002944786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075092605,0.00008084145,0.9944296,0.000005928166,0.000039666087,0.00004229611,0.0012561902,0.00013585655,0.00010262846,0.00037348832,0.00072052644,0.0027378227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034763814,0.000025609417,0.9971131,0.000008141734,0.000009522582,0.000015111257,0.0014393434,0.0005159882,0.000037622805,0.00030807697,0.0005203909,0.0000035801445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015151079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022915028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015151079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004351147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037594413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030125797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400098253","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfae018","title":"Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Newcastle University","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Victory; Presidential election; Democracy; Spillover effect; Political economy; Political science; Politics; Mediation; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.052269411752802704,"score_gpt":0.40275662753714236,"score_spread":0.35048721578433967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400098253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952466,0.00013078588,0.0005478723,0.0002995061,0.000009644249,0.000015179799,0.00008012588,0.00000893127,0.009383321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946326,0.000029029003,0.000057378136,0.000024711328,0.0000040561104,0.0000034323318,0.00003305373,0.000001430405,0.00038363002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862623,0.0004787354,0.00007627731,0.00026566104,0.0001888975,0.0003641372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98911256,0.004578792,0.0035551754,0.0010607392,0.0008020621,0.0008907302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014855844,0.00017744659,0.0004673298,0.0007119522,0.00096618803,0.0021713793,0.00029581974,0.0004904963,0.010788455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010409434,0.0001641,0.00034955272,0.00070056354,0.0010555922,0.0012771769,0.0024399154,0.0009162377,0.00035981432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007272613,0.0006652891,0.9319356,0.00021680736,0.00035185265,0.0011127517,0.012515908,0.0011698066,0.0029665001,0.01325851,0.0013825101,0.03369718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034195815,0.0002921139,0.9709263,0.00009205597,0.00023078006,0.00028992002,0.018630158,0.0015751189,0.0012439409,0.003582618,0.003075652,0.000027074217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00953406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009809705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010788455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011247188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008724424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03609091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401413198","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfae020","title":"The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Populism; Voting; Distrust; Straight-ticket voting; Political science; Politics; Legitimacy; Voting behavior; Direct mail; Democracy; Disapproval voting; Democratic legitimacy; First-past-the-post voting; Advertising; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.00835728870026388,"score_gpt":0.26148106654242653,"score_spread":0.25312377784216267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401413198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853872,0.0004851635,0.00015207908,0.003659087,0.0000345129,0.000020843172,0.0015270497,0.000012115226,0.008721961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767023,0.00012902045,0.000054667704,0.00015681637,0.000009254809,0.0000040703985,0.00031515994,0.0000056171116,0.0016550495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975018,0.00027043524,0.000090423746,0.00028776593,0.00070174003,0.001147911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890591,0.0020605305,0.003086778,0.00059129036,0.0026228933,0.002579368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016583288,0.0002506141,0.00060432765,0.0017043307,0.0051964084,0.0021366775,0.0011018672,0.0007222969,0.0068803974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010176851,0.00024674353,0.0008734372,0.003489287,0.002149067,0.0007320205,0.0015873293,0.0014984531,0.00029079337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012354853,0.000036971003,0.9870997,0.00001966476,0.000050027964,0.00012983051,0.0034263032,0.00017824731,0.0001198912,0.0013643873,0.0023163087,0.005135028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691132,0.000016351796,0.99073505,0.000038112616,0.00004576991,0.000032949196,0.0055140075,0.0005972568,0.00011830649,0.00018819698,0.0026798535,0.000021538886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99506843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99695385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023669133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023669133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030649155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17173237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410647496","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf002","title":"The Preference-Expectation Gap in Support for Female Candidates: Evidence from Japan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University","keywords":"Preference; Moderation; Social psychology; Psychology; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Conjoint analysis; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1243297238836331,"score_gpt":0.38579944499246754,"score_spread":0.26146972110883443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410647496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99758446,0.00013211131,0.00013381093,0.00014832696,0.0000066066045,0.0000058004707,0.00007778951,9.2326326e-7,0.0019100573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954945,0.00005842369,0.00005402922,0.00007435475,0.000008689332,0.000006943634,0.00008769298,0.0000016523545,0.00015883298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968466,0.0015114311,0.00024484293,0.0005996814,0.00045084732,0.0003465543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710779,0.012977985,0.009047794,0.0026285534,0.0029671849,0.001300583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073398524,0.0002833423,0.0005782463,0.00082176004,0.0014508395,0.0013916496,0.0004889945,0.00070786325,0.0057402933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01669072,0.00027319972,0.0005066748,0.0016323639,0.0019528787,0.0009834499,0.0016847765,0.0007954691,0.000481479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016668723,0.0005988115,0.9596563,0.0003408421,0.00028428924,0.0003730705,0.019352347,0.000100094585,0.0019628084,0.0012913246,0.0008485585,0.013524702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055198572,0.00023837494,0.9844811,0.00004082652,0.00019949784,0.00008299487,0.01247276,0.00018504757,0.0005833727,0.00039628355,0.0012411078,0.000023471095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017584624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022747107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017584624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000590189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038817286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413104793","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf032","title":"Relationships, Trust and Accountability, and Critical Reflexivity: Developing Quality Data with the “Hard to Reach”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Accountability; Quality (philosophy); Function (biology); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.2507367311925055,"score_gpt":0.469733296868817,"score_spread":0.21899656567631148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413104793","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27217123,0.0076075955,0.34194964,0.31939787,0.0016965615,0.005531008,0.00024351734,0.00031382334,0.051088773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8432764,0.002239299,0.13266519,0.012447925,0.0003151117,0.0067875474,0.00008885248,0.00013457253,0.00204511],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.43033332,0.54207295,0.006361362,0.0055247126,0.012022737,0.0036849685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38725236,0.5080262,0.028951379,0.0417005,0.024215458,0.009854076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3408321,0.00087323954,0.0011822359,0.0057117506,0.022619074,0.021177683,0.004772046,0.0071609407,0.0026645458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4650922,0.001802668,0.000986005,0.004636117,0.08050506,0.026434973,0.030015638,0.012490811,0.0007764731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058472702,0.000096362084,0.0029738178,0.0006152812,0.000037817892,0.0005300835,0.8974546,0.00019377789,0.00069116935,0.07028492,0.0035834864,0.023480251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000737318,0.0002016143,0.0034603786,0.0030657796,0.00006407512,0.0011482959,0.71033555,0.0012640313,0.0022286405,0.18666627,0.09130829,0.00018348283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004830822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007006045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014244792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027049141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81287134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105486","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf028","title":"To Report or Not to Report? A Qualitative Analysis of Journalists’ Perspectives on Harm to Public Opinion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Public opinion; Political science; Public relations; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.11643303122078606,"score_gpt":0.47360559196064306,"score_spread":0.357172560739857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494435,0.001870567,0.0055008344,0.024151694,0.00051895843,0.00027239975,0.0003087335,0.000039967777,0.017893385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926565,0.00084366853,0.0009344618,0.0031618811,0.00013468515,0.000256322,0.00005747871,0.000040506864,0.0019144549],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93611175,0.053277384,0.0014862948,0.0015835316,0.0040591154,0.003481865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7654834,0.20588905,0.010899749,0.0023403456,0.010496045,0.004891399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05351902,0.00052388303,0.00094778155,0.0029045013,0.0120952455,0.010272877,0.0016601811,0.0034513364,0.0018392148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10357335,0.000857229,0.0005447078,0.0030696455,0.014168656,0.007166934,0.0051836455,0.0046131792,0.00032616762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004728067,0.000017106784,0.0027453376,0.00014646261,0.0000060474194,0.0004566846,0.9910026,0.000016792876,0.00050067867,0.002337963,0.0006056158,0.0021174345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000542713,0.000024049914,0.0011728337,0.00015400218,0.0000048080697,0.00014874805,0.9889943,0.00005556983,0.00022515959,0.0005541343,0.008646999,0.000014011971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005431851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066986075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05351902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007472304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008167439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28303903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417089030","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf041","title":"How Can We Size Your Core Issue? Assessing Salience Validity Using Psychophysiology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Operationalization; Measure (data warehouse); Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychophysiology; Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Construct validity","score_opus":0.1539296185902544,"score_gpt":0.4291466390266063,"score_spread":0.27521702043635193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417089030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94177324,0.001372751,0.030744683,0.0040184655,0.00031062376,0.00041465057,0.00015327724,0.00006904011,0.021143194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904066,0.0006594475,0.007587205,0.00049778895,0.00013198463,0.0001808593,0.00006512853,0.00002152109,0.00044946722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936522,0.0033761493,0.00038057062,0.0005440749,0.0017460564,0.0003008486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9469975,0.034398597,0.008414864,0.0025715055,0.006157324,0.001460196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016598182,0.0003347378,0.00052715396,0.0018317595,0.0008362644,0.0031182976,0.00055689696,0.0010796763,0.0020257449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109048076,0.00029963662,0.00053822895,0.00080546475,0.001769625,0.0041492023,0.0024674432,0.0013293668,0.0006036527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081137626,0.0007857014,0.6229098,0.001148837,0.00043644253,0.00031721088,0.045474604,0.001093067,0.030561987,0.01127113,0.0033080338,0.28188172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010157427,0.0015620565,0.8694359,0.00081963354,0.00030950466,0.0005528565,0.04773698,0.008894853,0.010940147,0.046489548,0.012969432,0.00018757205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075555645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006639223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016598182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050283014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009204372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087780595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}