{"meta":{"query_hash":"f32878505816","filters":{"venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f32878505816","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Opinion+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2024364466","doi":"10.1086/378963","title":"The International Economy and Presidential Approval","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Public opinion; Library science; Public administration; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.040194931960415514,"score_gpt":0.32763023993735196,"score_spread":0.28743530797693645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024364466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22171141,0.0005428413,0.002121879,0.118995644,0.008167392,0.0008770687,0.0000072082485,0.00018047572,0.6473961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979735,0.000006512522,0.00002069894,0.00009132742,0.0004913913,0.00003300668,0.0000025668453,0.0000031935938,0.0013778021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991925,0.00018773953,0.00014117478,0.00010732425,0.00014513911,0.00022615097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995692,0.00012757881,0.00004534358,0.000073290415,0.00007061204,0.000114024646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071635516,0.0000435375,0.000047439604,0.000022234295,0.00045111222,0.0005682616,0.00011988569,0.000039357765,0.00010862697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015253223,0.000033459055,0.00002303604,0.000055989087,0.00012171245,0.00033108602,0.0000046612768,0.000051064395,0.000037582067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015046618,0.000010217543,0.004704507,0.0000017297458,0.000007974669,6.0217424e-8,0.0010836776,5.229995e-8,0.000005195201,0.98361176,0.0032477858,0.0073255533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011944837,0.00004272881,0.00307886,0.0000020651173,0.0000012180558,8.3584365e-7,0.00091742096,0.000051050632,0.000007071342,0.038480658,0.95724434,0.000054334832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093921233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014716303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95399654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037527192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010297925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54797596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050649007","doi":"10.1086/320040","title":"Validation of Time-of-Voting-Decision Recall","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Voting; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.020783210723156822,"score_gpt":0.2625400784675149,"score_spread":0.24175686774435812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050649007","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23851696,0.000054150732,0.75910133,0.00060295773,0.0004893676,0.00008691326,0.0000015236968,0.000079086916,0.0010676836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935519,0.000008537751,0.006112301,0.00003775775,0.000110759276,0.0000033921433,0.000018061253,0.000008190529,0.0001490808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816567,0.00011400939,0.00066166697,0.0003378289,0.00047276614,0.00024807034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998646,0.00022396569,0.00039611684,0.00031516785,0.0003347457,0.00008396836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082800596,0.00013159995,0.0002807691,0.00028431226,0.000054769353,0.00012907306,0.000779388,0.000086979686,0.00014797779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108170396,0.00011766257,0.00016834392,0.00065283105,0.000036276797,0.0006776961,0.000054363263,0.0001068662,0.00009077681],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027525752,0.00045480978,0.0020702435,0.000045337434,0.00010208443,0.0000036587612,0.00610346,0.0009116978,0.0007687488,0.40222618,0.0039213398,0.5833649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005210865,0.0007268897,0.0014494295,0.00012047311,0.000009324321,0.000020730244,0.00017344607,0.98840135,0.0004996823,0.00034206943,0.00747456,0.0002609271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016228252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039880324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023656317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050783372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47981402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098478814","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfh042","title":"The Polls in the 2002 French Presidential Election: An Autopsy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Presidential system; Prime minister; Presidential election; Political science; National election; General election; Front (military); Shock (circulatory); Law; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.043019244535967546,"score_gpt":0.3559846864333282,"score_spread":0.31296544189736064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098478814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7172684,0.0005285764,0.0010835767,0.21868055,0.0049944604,0.0015544076,0.0000093885365,0.00026205552,0.0556186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764687,0.000005373467,0.000011415023,0.0002144221,0.0013081178,0.000082570456,0.000004774276,0.000005058271,0.0007214258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980089,0.00065409124,0.0002534778,0.00015895691,0.00043768896,0.00048689492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.00013828758,0.0000665153,0.00021387012,0.00008128666,0.00011869063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013777702,0.00007677356,0.00007941782,0.0000470659,0.0008797486,0.00067142287,0.00035327903,0.00008371061,0.00014682247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011150793,0.00004785988,0.00004414023,0.0004621761,0.00014359223,0.0005834225,0.000004321863,0.00015343899,0.00010817275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045860775,0.00015105838,0.003342674,0.000004532493,0.000007893433,8.825365e-7,0.025958609,0.000004873731,0.000029803534,0.94807523,0.007105859,0.015313976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076622656,0.0009889024,0.33609608,0.000024993307,0.000007224618,0.000006089648,0.007676143,0.000094252,0.000018315128,0.11486607,0.5391541,0.00030158504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06266169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10087661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83320916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113977956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024397002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94358015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105257747","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft024","title":"Do Attitudes about Immigration Predict Willingness to Admit Individual Immigrants?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Library science; Political science; Government (linguistics); Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037170631078214146,"score_gpt":0.33908461162086784,"score_spread":0.30191398054265367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105257747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94981194,0.00027770645,0.0012729486,0.029500134,0.004983418,0.0010017685,0.000034625966,0.00034714426,0.012770316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958217,0.000052626576,0.00017757283,0.0012676545,0.001644898,0.00032442366,0.00005232417,0.000018962372,0.00063985144],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763155,0.00030047304,0.00039332875,0.0004392193,0.0005942377,0.00064121117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.00010847362,0.0001412138,0.0002636865,0.00031085862,0.00040644873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007185126,0.00018254975,0.00023079918,0.00017477924,0.00061858783,0.0007894521,0.0006314441,0.00023561987,0.0017792344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014589702,0.00017315577,0.000116920935,0.000586876,0.00020066035,0.0012200623,0.000027098602,0.00018330365,0.0014429521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022241331,0.00039077477,0.12924592,0.000020246493,0.000107040076,9.4847803e-7,0.13449442,3.3480046e-7,0.0002162798,0.050212946,0.1062297,0.5790591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040715773,0.0006737648,0.69653815,0.000044354885,0.0000073021433,0.00000143999,0.023588631,0.000010097777,0.0000054456505,0.0031850303,0.2751917,0.00034690587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008770676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028194522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007965802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001329778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109371943","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfp051","title":"The Dynamics of Party Identification Reconsidered","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Dynamics (music); Public opinion; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.056491912944454874,"score_gpt":0.35551577851633526,"score_spread":0.2990238655718804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109371943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5463703,0.0004276707,0.004781229,0.40101555,0.0042813825,0.0012111256,0.000035623147,0.00028016136,0.041596953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989338,0.000009775196,0.000015208965,0.00006183732,0.0001989011,0.000011985959,0.000016095653,0.000002586974,0.000749802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878776,0.0002788094,0.0003290571,0.00010355575,0.00024129005,0.00025950954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992037,0.00017765215,0.00015562438,0.00017645374,0.00018862459,0.00009793411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010088056,0.00004893238,0.00008434483,0.000032501364,0.00041002154,0.00016220551,0.00014960064,0.000059994738,0.000033949706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002370561,0.000037328307,0.000045783443,0.00021483061,0.00012339016,0.00026856546,0.000001896184,0.000055974426,0.000033062766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026538005,0.000027031458,0.0017082738,0.0000025502327,0.0000036864008,2.8695958e-8,0.0014561828,1.3830275e-7,0.000043555465,0.90687436,0.001637128,0.08824443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050294225,0.0008316829,0.255473,0.0000448399,0.000014322607,0.0000014672493,0.00816388,0.0028210755,0.00011210005,0.54923457,0.1824233,0.00037680988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046484624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4525635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072103096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010574032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31535956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125193835","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft039","title":"Polling and Democracy: Executive Summary of the AAPOR Task Force Report on Public Opinion and Leadership","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Public relations; Conviction; Political science; Democracy; Task (project management); Politics; Polling; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3855075452714246,"score_gpt":0.38480326864355324,"score_spread":0.0007042766278713697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125193835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37832057,0.0024874206,0.0003848128,0.5452349,0.0026995987,0.0023248862,0.000053811247,0.00026801066,0.06822595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996043,0.0013965417,0.0000676331,0.0005807565,0.00021769278,0.000049046463,0.000071097005,0.000012768036,0.0015614537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830747,0.0004325926,0.00033608268,0.00026527155,0.00034275206,0.000315811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986207,0.00026993154,0.00029134794,0.00043038427,0.00021405204,0.00017356571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009772948,0.00012656595,0.00016673603,0.00010971837,0.0006989538,0.00031181914,0.00030586444,0.00013730065,0.00015028875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028529088,0.0001017824,0.00006002975,0.00031699843,0.00037534043,0.00080500584,0.000054889464,0.00018746642,0.000013419709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048175287,0.00045932957,0.10943589,0.0002893426,0.000092388545,0.0000010564283,0.19184902,3.164917e-7,0.0013472803,0.19124128,0.05250186,0.45273405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011404167,0.0005927853,0.27902636,0.00041022213,0.000014908359,0.00003568403,0.20367421,0.000433279,0.000030274705,0.017855536,0.49613342,0.0006529224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011821184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049093773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61772245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063998465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010346336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53758585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140450198","doi":"10.1086/318640","title":"Do People Have Feelings Toward Leaders about Whom They Say They Know Nothing?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Feeling; Library science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04150776594936123,"score_gpt":0.3377974987260428,"score_spread":0.2962897327766816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140450198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46044025,0.0009704028,0.0004338023,0.2013927,0.0072398107,0.00083823217,0.000038757546,0.0008012324,0.32784483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889599,0.0003392221,0.00008969329,0.0028414612,0.0019533795,0.000064774904,0.000026046964,0.00003394446,0.0056915586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971057,0.000432546,0.00043564578,0.0005645929,0.0005630427,0.0008984646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988232,0.0001820732,0.00014479915,0.0003530266,0.00017961553,0.00031723946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009916646,0.0002508034,0.00034827716,0.00014976131,0.00095616205,0.00082732586,0.0007912616,0.00035914587,0.0046855533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012144261,0.00023374587,0.00024224272,0.00026101625,0.0004348796,0.0008455208,0.000016588032,0.00037460375,0.001445032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027653085,0.00013445382,0.004391795,0.000009303299,0.000036518566,0.0000010167682,0.62568957,4.5362313e-7,0.000015348553,0.017082924,0.015199546,0.33741143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051435805,0.00032536185,0.009769928,0.000036551526,0.0000069602957,0.0000029685787,0.11215062,0.000025244479,0.000001465812,0.008717621,0.8681008,0.00034808848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013811255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074464376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013925215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023147654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147872545","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfn017","title":"Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":446,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homosexuality; Public opinion; Cohort; Demography; Politics; Attitude change; Cohort effect; Psychology; General Social Survey; Cohort study; Political science; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.09422929284971764,"score_gpt":0.321792967793562,"score_spread":0.22756367494384433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147872545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916952,0.00021572888,0.000005120026,0.0073052603,0.0002072287,0.00031415795,0.000013673378,0.00000706207,0.00023656122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948937,0.000079828074,0.0000025535023,0.0001869848,0.00009620953,0.00008205285,0.000016678645,0.0000027671106,0.000043574575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.000522432,0.00030583027,0.00013052151,0.00030186836,0.00030484385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994284,0.00024186658,0.00008374848,0.00009077956,0.00006432195,0.00009091391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006574785,0.00006973927,0.00021583827,0.00007738044,0.00012331542,0.000027617101,0.000115379946,0.000037719412,0.000028207234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054203723,0.000051383813,0.000012968983,0.0005291443,0.0002813076,0.00018040783,0.0000061414535,0.000094674375,9.562032e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011855779,0.00002424787,0.955767,0.000013327366,0.0000037772502,0.0000010068032,0.018201692,4.855812e-7,2.8865554e-7,0.024684288,0.00006379836,0.0012282296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044395475,0.000053232798,0.993545,0.000025492323,0.000001133135,6.375768e-7,0.0015390299,0.00048789062,3.6499463e-7,0.00069910876,0.0031337426,0.000070434646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99794424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037777975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020685236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005934273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2095371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154529659","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfi002","title":"Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":935,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Non-response bias; Quarter (Canadian coin); Telephone survey; Response bias; Psychology; Perception; Demography; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Social psychology; Geography; Economics; Advertising; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.14005562517633982,"score_gpt":0.39966426755399675,"score_spread":0.2596086423776569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154529659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337656,0.00047404532,0.00021283492,0.06078447,0.0023668897,0.0004681485,0.000053391726,0.000117811964,0.0017568227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959777,0.0002077846,0.0002060806,0.001574681,0.0012679178,0.0000866697,0.000044898472,0.000019034505,0.0006152102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.959121,0.038661405,0.00038482214,0.0004451232,0.0005169867,0.000870657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519903,0.013873063,0.00014450809,0.00045164788,0.00013405863,0.00019767445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051696613,0.0002006684,0.00026720596,0.00032924622,0.00050390715,0.00020250409,0.00061121356,0.00026848225,0.0011245726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037476476,0.00015730351,0.00008237975,0.0010041599,0.0004175008,0.00047206884,0.000027604448,0.00038063002,0.00029960266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006026517,0.0007497213,0.57452434,0.000012917615,0.000078742974,0.000012164381,0.13313188,0.0000017473849,0.00019582293,0.00434205,0.05708045,0.22384362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003973377,0.00011809585,0.6692312,0.0000060220864,0.0000015086505,0.0000019537765,0.004523775,0.000010236082,0.0000036629253,0.000069792506,0.32548714,0.00014927633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004188957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13604274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2684067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012717156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002787495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165992382","doi":"10.1093/poq/nft042","title":"Coding Voter Turnout Responses in the Current Population Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Politics; Democracy; Population; Citizenship; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Voting; Demography","score_opus":0.12068156517723279,"score_gpt":0.397223798644595,"score_spread":0.27654223346736223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165992382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771739,0.00007393194,0.00014567537,0.019773396,0.0010260997,0.0005058825,0.000007035092,0.000042195315,0.0012518817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999256,0.000003354978,0.000005391351,0.00012300562,0.00038863905,0.00008882113,0.000043830692,0.000004576216,0.000086343294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969831,0.0019060349,0.00027229462,0.0001385421,0.00033524813,0.0003647489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906915,0.00051042804,0.00007271002,0.0001410951,0.000112312555,0.000094327195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022115689,0.00007079017,0.000097939395,0.00008813057,0.00023777495,0.00041661435,0.00017547005,0.00005233936,0.00012448925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004534165,0.000050425366,0.000032742537,0.0003433647,0.000051292584,0.00057904125,0.0000044921867,0.00013618618,0.0001757884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010563212,0.00008914053,0.7700538,0.000014235968,0.000003364113,1.3839123e-7,0.01488695,2.998076e-7,0.0000100831385,0.12104657,0.00438573,0.08949909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008816543,0.00007662353,0.97694254,0.000017032722,7.1568905e-7,1.4946974e-7,0.0005037581,0.000089274,2.6635544e-7,0.006049903,0.016154291,0.00007728805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08310761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023374934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2068887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008336452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006416241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272783963","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfv054","title":"Party Identification, Contact, Contexts, and Public Attitudes toward Illegal Immigration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conference Board of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Interpersonal communication; Salient; Ethnic group; Politics; Contact theory; Population; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.056723173056157525,"score_gpt":0.3450844534490306,"score_spread":0.28836128039287307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272783963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73828036,0.00055251224,0.007459063,0.24623685,0.0023288862,0.0009056386,0.000060185856,0.00037014572,0.003806382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982531,0.000038187973,0.000014176331,0.00015000382,0.0005820672,0.00009702418,0.00002404036,0.000009745848,0.00083164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802417,0.00040363858,0.00041202753,0.0002943209,0.00037617245,0.0004896462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987321,0.00020442835,0.0001591369,0.00018383435,0.00035468533,0.00036584647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008944215,0.000118756,0.0001687571,0.00009731228,0.00042719222,0.0005669001,0.00015696697,0.0001221885,0.00025711092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003350098,0.000086966895,0.00005176712,0.00020481236,0.00021064641,0.0015605598,0.000009578206,0.00006349041,0.00017930304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059518825,0.00006776217,0.09244956,0.000016572723,0.000018973455,2.1390859e-7,0.0028995704,3.4681733e-9,0.0008964543,0.85039043,0.0038761015,0.04937842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000865937,0.00038601152,0.4316466,0.00006121055,0.000010089442,0.0000023737546,0.0024547426,0.000018514425,0.00007998175,0.0105926925,0.55348676,0.00039510257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039294017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006886355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83979774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012125962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001828699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5940106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346942379","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfw016","title":"Cross-National Trends in Religious Service Attendance: Table 1.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Library science; Service (business); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04319358314710601,"score_gpt":0.38031162809284097,"score_spread":0.33711804494573494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346942379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16064344,0.0002774185,0.0008771241,0.48777786,0.0057571596,0.0003414873,0.00012900979,0.00057684263,0.34361964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863246,0.00017688697,0.000090011774,0.0019527872,0.00057980994,0.0000622926,0.000027564758,0.000012845323,0.010773184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998252,0.00014139838,0.00030693875,0.00028598274,0.0005731643,0.00044051328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989427,0.00016095837,0.00010672811,0.00016751714,0.00044975648,0.00017234444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006986249,0.0001084864,0.00013089375,0.00021831783,0.00034791284,0.00031595823,0.00031324395,0.00014587479,0.0012890513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114708004,0.00008853824,0.00009041264,0.0010735664,0.00013457534,0.0010826382,0.000012826657,0.000125628,0.0005754394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031441694,0.00038605538,0.07337046,0.000015010254,0.000044998716,0.0000026972757,0.046341702,0.0000048838756,0.0002695852,0.24598716,0.4878747,0.14567131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069828384,0.000056875306,0.028750336,0.00003111266,9.710761e-7,0.0000025584493,0.0032811945,0.000041757696,0.0000036851206,0.0050959657,0.9618527,0.00018451503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038821737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82568115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003420778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029849148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461902677","doi":"10.1086/320041","title":"The Polls—Review","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025126213952517164,"score_gpt":0.2868048499672095,"score_spread":0.2616786360146923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461902677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046540287,0.07315424,0.000070032875,0.3611995,0.0044554533,0.00042966663,0.000009673763,0.00017346482,0.56004256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17340475,0.51165754,0.00007991593,0.019584848,0.006712226,0.0002976546,0.00005599263,0.00006424507,0.28814286],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989955,0.00015732732,0.00014337059,0.00011467028,0.00028086416,0.00030828142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940836,0.00006983973,0.000055620476,0.00019976463,0.00007470183,0.00019171304],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007396388,0.000047143443,0.000077356584,0.00010366655,0.001954073,0.0007942666,0.0003326368,0.000038995633,0.0012142952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001033769,0.00004498589,0.00007217496,0.00045613426,0.0003498683,0.0003258735,0.0000052720047,0.00008469119,0.00079895736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.751874e-7,0.000010410509,0.00006309486,0.000011244648,0.0000044147714,9.2132217e-7,0.0018194617,2.737305e-9,2.0767406e-7,0.13464026,0.379117,0.4843323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049513557,0.000024053783,0.00081435853,0.000031387055,0.000002012739,0.0000020086236,0.0011587447,6.8259664e-7,6.6041435e-9,0.0010151278,0.9968382,0.000063896456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108652614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59936845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025047894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058614457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793769061","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfx047","title":"An Evaluation of the 2016 Election Polls in the United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":207,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Polling; Presidential system; Opinion poll; Political science; Presidential election; Public opinion; Turnout; Voting; Preference; Public administration; Psychology; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.3219762045230792,"score_gpt":0.49870578518667097,"score_spread":0.1767295806635918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793769061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97868997,0.00003165259,0.00016130452,0.01806355,0.0010516646,0.00031449046,0.0000063168964,0.000013059864,0.0016679881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953365,0.000024028006,0.00003089185,0.00016532671,0.00013543059,0.000028472763,0.000017429806,0.0000029867178,0.000061778555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696126,0.029428305,0.00016648883,0.00012746693,0.00047721804,0.00018790984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971925,0.0018189447,0.00021171625,0.00047430213,0.00027126443,0.000031298703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06148619,0.000052637934,0.00007538091,0.000115180475,0.00086947007,0.00015641142,0.0006586097,0.00008770901,0.000082284816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005549462,0.000031608244,0.00003545959,0.00030424353,0.00030936868,0.00047018952,0.0000070085935,0.00011703446,0.000006605476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010407784,0.00070242566,0.215321,0.000012124264,0.000059551483,4.607399e-7,0.3163069,0.000035601748,0.0008197469,0.047808636,0.007396962,0.41049582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033767722,0.00014362363,0.96042055,0.000008897563,0.000005779672,4.8333084e-7,0.013943022,0.0005363081,0.00003987243,0.009171712,0.015338075,0.000054000346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012172398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00874617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74509954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004277995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034242173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974511225","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfl007","title":"Annual Membership Meeting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Associate editor; Management; Cliff; Vice president; Executive director; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.033215051964732054,"score_gpt":0.3070115638762204,"score_spread":0.27379651191148835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974511225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18729825,0.000812417,0.00017083368,0.03105592,0.0018175803,0.00029582446,0.000056356705,0.0004737843,0.778019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957485,0.000011914987,0.00012412449,0.00025169807,0.001431166,0.000014327675,0.0000147731425,0.000009626787,0.002393866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841803,0.00020383057,0.0002247264,0.00020170098,0.00041480522,0.00053690636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934316,0.00013882598,0.000089232024,0.00014540521,0.00014007077,0.00014330843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007630424,0.00011181174,0.00013773057,0.00009694431,0.000670759,0.00019893088,0.00019726496,0.00007604663,0.00027626794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110687295,0.0001075912,0.00007749538,0.00031519032,0.0001805481,0.0007312113,0.000013889951,0.0000846587,0.00022265973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018785442,0.00029926182,0.06513804,0.00003240298,0.000049744525,0.0000046743685,0.1783343,0.0000017658027,0.00002688499,0.4399045,0.20473042,0.11145921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036208346,0.00015849929,0.030297428,0.000019563588,0.0000048250654,0.000001290089,0.09077213,0.0000055597334,0.000006180275,0.010919769,0.8671912,0.0002615009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004888846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045955395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8084502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042095344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011505349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7390505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005146891","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfz048","title":"Follow the (ISSUE) Leader? The Leader-Led Nexus Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Generalizability theory; Priming (agriculture); Voting; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Test (biology); Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Politics; Law; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06097321714158251,"score_gpt":0.3414881944304853,"score_spread":0.2805149772889028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005146891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20982282,0.0010055092,0.00035782994,0.6555993,0.0060384236,0.002627048,0.000014302942,0.00039378947,0.124140985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871267,0.0000049051905,0.000005692754,0.0015627898,0.0015525923,0.00006455917,0.000014341223,0.000013247305,0.0080692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974063,0.0008436029,0.0003214365,0.00024187943,0.00055030856,0.00063646823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986814,0.0004294674,0.00012968776,0.00043563033,0.00015777248,0.00016601718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014702567,0.00013197423,0.00018821319,0.000044849916,0.00068748626,0.0005298308,0.0005003191,0.000121707155,0.0009907467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001858401,0.00007509538,0.00012388543,0.0005194738,0.00020567162,0.00042951602,0.000013194226,0.00022626712,0.002335908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149186935,0.00007878622,0.014209516,0.00004700147,0.000055500557,4.6840907e-7,0.042836677,0.0000016637528,0.00011661431,0.8488406,0.06477157,0.029026683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029120353,0.00022608205,0.009987809,0.00002689747,0.000008960263,9.4103484e-7,0.010401074,0.00022415693,0.000005095458,0.004803264,0.97386104,0.00016348544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004503544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012225601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90908945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080290396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014106391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008539663","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfz053","title":"Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forces College; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectualism; Ideology; Elite; Opposition (politics); Populism; Rhetoric; Politics; Salient; Political science; Social psychology; Mainstream; Sociology; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2848221792204148,"score_gpt":0.41754435645234256,"score_spread":0.13272217723192775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008539663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84505796,0.0005105253,0.00008819296,0.10067091,0.0011808133,0.00063454924,0.000023303428,0.00026475886,0.05156899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943848,0.00073094864,0.0002538253,0.0014389887,0.00016659945,0.000023627637,0.00005017149,0.0000137458455,0.0029372943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865776,0.00032489983,0.00021055415,0.00026043344,0.00024990243,0.00029642688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989962,0.00019263402,0.0000679076,0.00035785887,0.00016467753,0.0002207136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052350404,0.00010606369,0.00016449882,0.00014653381,0.00038099842,0.00025315353,0.00025564196,0.00009799584,0.0015258075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017072044,0.00010939437,0.000035520956,0.00039935944,0.00011650698,0.00018243022,0.000029435161,0.0000990835,0.00045933094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101182326,0.00022760002,0.010290238,0.000062862455,0.00003406088,0.0000011240501,0.64753735,3.5444657e-7,0.004510086,0.10570967,0.13241963,0.099105835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028387996,0.00008884764,0.009418585,0.00004182262,9.831293e-7,9.910815e-7,0.03614727,0.00002677365,0.0000101249625,0.00039248329,0.9534011,0.00018711977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080446835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016419884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8209815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007630368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005956301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035161100","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaa017","title":"Reinforcement Effects between Digital Media Use and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Repeated-Wave Panel Data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; MacEwan University","keywords":"Panel data; Leverage (statistics); Reinforcement; Politics; Globe; Political efficacy; Digital media; Panel analysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.43057688374534697,"score_gpt":0.3939282830590794,"score_spread":0.036648600686267574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035161100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86903363,0.0005587919,0.005133784,0.11197734,0.0013360817,0.0016409792,0.004897523,0.00041475947,0.005007102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975486,0.0000087862545,0.0000794483,0.0005639203,0.0006028767,0.00001614006,0.0011537167,0.00000864546,0.000017894172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977709,0.00030970786,0.00046831515,0.00033463252,0.00063751376,0.00047891407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965758,0.0019352501,0.00016548333,0.00039115577,0.00017511008,0.00075722043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036781334,0.00013482627,0.00066577346,0.00012508668,0.00014380564,0.0003734257,0.00028288533,0.0001169402,0.00011499559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027952767,0.000120316225,0.00021924064,0.00074333884,0.0003285933,0.0010766273,0.00007086108,0.000106754494,0.000010355924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033019354,0.00018606518,0.10818064,0.00012262634,0.06538387,0.00001256073,0.23417552,0.0000016756292,0.0000103105085,0.56925106,0.0037689607,0.018873675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040051728,0.0037795317,0.33111042,0.0000471073,0.257,0.0000021227863,0.11508267,0.0078213895,0.00019480204,0.01406818,0.2638493,0.0030393158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015015857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011011294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5551829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030791252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001615749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4906353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125853874","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfx034","title":"North American Public Opinion on Health and Smoking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Public health; Lung cancer; Polling; Environmental health; Smoke; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.07567155769854805,"score_gpt":0.35655549908318035,"score_spread":0.2808839413846323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125853874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943764,0.00010300589,0.0002069194,0.052476622,0.0015006117,0.0003889011,0.000016648364,0.00017454932,0.0013687698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974039,0.00024295221,0.000061878796,0.0013041887,0.00056956726,0.000044479762,0.00028609746,0.000032280688,0.00005463708],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998156,0.0000818532,0.00032667798,0.00045510882,0.0004927262,0.0004876168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979737,0.000044332493,0.00045573094,0.0008324086,0.00013096217,0.00056288415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004038033,0.00020754596,0.00035363773,0.00027667065,0.0007201867,0.00057735556,0.00021418197,0.00006584594,0.0000323465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001575572,0.00018848504,0.00007323047,0.00017532147,0.0002082509,0.00055921805,0.000029441871,0.00030750653,0.000010963943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021954873,0.00010467219,0.56521255,0.000031370484,0.000016632708,0.0000010461099,0.000581126,1.6629409e-8,0.000002016623,0.001226223,0.0015429561,0.43125942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011346997,0.0024202247,0.9322327,0.000082216204,0.000005235234,0.000029912258,0.0007882141,0.000035855097,0.0000033826514,0.000052004518,0.06304255,0.00017305158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004889841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013020696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43108636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001512036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024822124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7686197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173457332","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab006","title":"Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Polling; Context (archaeology); Variance (accounting); Opinion poll; Political science; Public opinion; Portrait; Social desirability bias; Demographic economics; Sociology; Social desirability; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Geography; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0922325599431251,"score_gpt":0.39714982053543496,"score_spread":0.30491726059230984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173457332","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010475514,0.064460345,0.0012558934,0.5710517,0.005494521,0.00082716503,0.000018676226,0.00050741836,0.34590876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911901,0.001119802,0.00006302113,0.0041012284,0.00092071947,0.000045345143,0.000035102847,0.0000071671616,0.002517549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988185,0.000360284,0.00018317407,0.00013225948,0.00021085893,0.0002949154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934393,0.00006552724,0.000040397932,0.00014319518,0.00021323375,0.00019369111],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004985115,0.000048831665,0.00011079285,0.000017873632,0.00019404627,0.00010832143,0.000084476116,0.000045896206,0.001214053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024814755,0.000047198897,0.000054146152,0.00031936093,0.000047081907,0.00024294535,0.000004430006,0.000058975784,0.00041625937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5326246e-7,0.000053390297,0.0017825941,0.0002028474,0.000008003456,0.0000012821187,0.0010845095,1.0839477e-8,0.000026711667,0.84417164,0.08595462,0.066713914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051104988,0.00003342798,0.0011289694,0.00017848848,0.000002428771,0.0000010286865,0.00021225985,0.0000025002357,0.0000043289306,0.0040020025,0.9943143,0.00006914704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011235324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011863552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98071456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004613027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025432924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199519442","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab034","title":"The Polls—Trends","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Dynamism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public opinion; Opinion poll; Politics; Political science; Perception; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.050065276729234234,"score_gpt":0.35287733798151977,"score_spread":0.30281206125228555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199519442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01002707,0.00090077345,0.0004674247,0.2823245,0.0057422393,0.000095390045,0.000010104779,0.0001317596,0.70030075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801276,0.000101736376,0.00005420289,0.00022870695,0.0007083299,0.0000112563885,0.000020503017,0.0000053266945,0.018742349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888504,0.0002247036,0.00012605696,0.00013842805,0.00030936394,0.00031639403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937147,0.0001008177,0.000042647847,0.00019544581,0.00016280057,0.00012683515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039782605,0.000048316164,0.00005114462,0.000039927483,0.0008948529,0.0005170044,0.00016691933,0.000047360703,0.00026208817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000777177,0.000036476136,0.00005975953,0.00033528288,0.00012267772,0.00017208033,0.000011587986,0.000067471316,0.00007904175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6995555e-7,0.00002567724,0.00074484904,0.0000014053173,0.000011563728,9.633632e-7,0.009661147,1.04032175e-7,0.000014258074,0.7607831,0.017435662,0.21132073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010225381,0.000021677426,0.010199938,0.0000015407717,0.0000015084535,0.0000016292762,0.0277559,0.00001925423,0.000010884537,0.015014817,0.94680965,0.00006095699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006652503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010954585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035049306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027114223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6882576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206313196","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab073","title":"Macropartisanship with Independents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Identification (biology); Politics; Political science; Erikson's stages of psychosocial development; Positive economics; Aggregate (composite); Variable (mathematics); Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06600991645779702,"score_gpt":0.35276033156736547,"score_spread":0.28675041510956845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206313196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84018725,0.0002225553,0.002679895,0.0471848,0.001845471,0.00039984012,0.000015874413,0.00030537494,0.107158944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973928,0.0000022016256,0.00009135266,0.00022396231,0.0004695128,0.00003008602,0.000020565476,0.000008477029,0.0017610634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984089,0.00034726795,0.00017153245,0.00019381917,0.0004349023,0.00044357253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.000066027984,0.000051987277,0.00015843251,0.00022120848,0.00027948574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036396683,0.00007442992,0.00010949231,0.00003607473,0.00029897716,0.00030605923,0.000110249806,0.000076848744,0.0006590393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007954325,0.00006587694,0.000033341275,0.00035666136,0.000092063325,0.00035209226,0.0000058884552,0.000099841454,0.00022958902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011862052,0.00015837808,0.16614366,0.000024389576,0.000028930057,0.000013763613,0.006823773,4.6395346e-7,0.00013221211,0.7992366,0.0033847378,0.024041217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012667944,0.00073353306,0.1655374,0.000089222616,0.000016473548,0.000019396131,0.00818434,0.000049671966,0.0003074058,0.025802528,0.7973614,0.00063186145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024920735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008547427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79397666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006846722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003413281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7216018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212824481","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfab069","title":"André Blais and Jean-François Daoust. <i>The Motivation to Vote: Explaining Electoral Participation</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Duty; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05592024519677271,"score_gpt":0.2981189016552424,"score_spread":0.2421986564584697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212824481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978369,0.009209111,0.009120408,0.24322535,0.005862903,0.0013292334,0.000041904055,0.00056280714,0.032811377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640065,0.00013367676,0.00012403753,0.0009877479,0.00081000983,0.00008017329,0.000020274563,0.00001014893,0.0014333031],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984624,0.0002606061,0.00022369887,0.0002594428,0.00038757516,0.000406272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989657,0.00036729284,0.00007173662,0.00014678107,0.00026030853,0.00018819138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005710869,0.00011147333,0.00015608585,0.000053075382,0.0012564794,0.00044497137,0.00014292939,0.000075575415,0.000062913175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009133733,0.000098102275,0.00004845013,0.00064535864,0.00016845734,0.00041691944,0.00002770555,0.00011189902,0.000015129305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019513447,0.00021332188,0.04333047,0.000034882924,0.00011674202,0.0000051937527,0.30315596,0.000007913621,0.00025176603,0.20748517,0.15665384,0.28872523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003526534,0.00018450404,0.05129217,0.000022691114,0.000009137797,6.236721e-7,0.017499622,0.000090851,0.000031331765,0.0018764442,0.928405,0.00023496621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022731049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014445379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77175117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010218275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015278932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9663951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214945778","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac012","title":"Ready for a Woman President?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of California","keywords":"Nomination; Democracy; Political science; Public relations; Voting; Perception; Test (biology); Worry; Psychology; Social psychology; Public administration; Advertising; Law; Politics; Business; Anxiety","score_opus":0.09469295241178304,"score_gpt":0.3744122444100257,"score_spread":0.27971929199824264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214945778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21751183,0.0008789967,0.011324982,0.3111451,0.022731103,0.006561392,0.00059182965,0.0011625321,0.42809224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330235,0.0000051935153,0.00014235995,0.00032503656,0.0005010591,0.0004160711,0.00010420223,0.000009644399,0.005194077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879265,0.00019682826,0.00014451373,0.00017971346,0.0003643254,0.00032199436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950534,0.00007898891,0.000070455986,0.00014538327,0.00008219845,0.00011763113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006147059,0.000053027805,0.00006953891,0.000092770715,0.0010477228,0.00017505299,0.00022563322,0.000026650145,0.0003585195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045437286,0.0000575526,0.00005509486,0.00015791028,0.000049983777,0.00020758946,0.000019994586,0.00006619499,0.000016786129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008598951,0.000116231975,0.0011491984,0.000012476479,0.000018941091,4.6520017e-7,0.046047255,0.0000036750494,0.000026169248,0.8586576,0.078110896,0.01584849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029871677,0.00024076633,0.002736031,8.8612563e-7,0.000002751935,0.0000011582806,0.047256935,0.00011082176,0.0000025101094,0.030031065,0.9192229,0.000095492025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019005137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022136843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84111196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021592538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80583423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294278840","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac031","title":"Measuring Support for Women’s Political Leadership","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Interview; Spouse; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Perception; Social desirability bias; Public opinion; Social desirability; Political science","score_opus":0.23779167206244547,"score_gpt":0.35396387346209324,"score_spread":0.11617220139964776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294278840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14738555,0.00020772385,0.007180079,0.36636215,0.017017795,0.0032908765,0.00035200675,0.0009187381,0.45728508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930116,8.184527e-7,0.00006837799,0.0007274459,0.0006281955,0.0005092193,0.000043254608,0.000012521073,0.00499857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793184,0.00023711007,0.00018690275,0.00022032172,0.00052258215,0.0009012559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927497,0.00010920361,0.000054037275,0.00014045877,0.0000942121,0.00032710307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012250395,0.00007247669,0.000100743775,0.00012833255,0.0009867141,0.00017356311,0.0002462214,0.000040619318,0.00088944426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009378334,0.00008123703,0.00007626471,0.00016472254,0.0000980417,0.0002083564,0.000020441475,0.000115253606,0.000023717237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070077194,0.000084825195,0.0010790688,0.000022484439,0.000014414756,4.7531555e-7,0.045131225,0.000001097286,0.000013868332,0.9432551,0.004271524,0.0061188517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037559765,0.00033852167,0.0015416902,0.0000010723585,0.0000020256687,0.0000025951376,0.34322372,0.000054769913,0.000005935647,0.039271213,0.61504614,0.00013669525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042567885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005217456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90398395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046527185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004501614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9738791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318765536","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac047","title":"Polarization Eh? Ideological Divergence and Partisan Sorting in the Canadian Mass Public","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Political economy; Public opinion; Sociology; Law; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08116095535041723,"score_gpt":0.3325489960296398,"score_spread":0.25138804067922255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318765536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8530628,0.00012941626,0.00019707478,0.13774507,0.00084206415,0.0005364369,0.000018095778,0.000061843304,0.0074071996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888664,0.0000013212306,0.000014152072,0.0006787513,0.00017977925,0.00011903329,0.000031586253,0.000004035433,0.00008468899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747515,0.0011218581,0.0002486044,0.0001859699,0.000414405,0.00055399694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938554,0.00012694088,0.00007755884,0.00010724074,0.00005430268,0.000248404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020243349,0.00006818647,0.000090970854,0.00011807322,0.0016563791,0.000370459,0.00024120534,0.00005981792,0.00036963247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027953245,0.000057424735,0.000023967154,0.0006020711,0.00012293526,0.00038240475,0.00001533556,0.00020380341,0.000012179375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0380115e-7,0.00001837198,0.4978963,0.0000025320742,0.0000019784616,0.0000011978033,0.0058251373,0.0000012036805,0.000014533549,0.49173498,0.00030656872,0.0041962718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023952218,0.00036798354,0.74900913,0.0000055878754,0.0000037101777,0.000003878938,0.012125137,0.00095682946,6.9844083e-7,0.037759643,0.19927385,0.00025400112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4528826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6870964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45397532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023954215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036149222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318765825","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfac044","title":"Before the Party Hijacks: The Limited Role of Party Cues in Appraisal of Low-Salience Policies—Experimental Evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Set (abstract data type); Social psychology; Political science; Positive economics; Public relations; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.055978679558881646,"score_gpt":0.37341105382506873,"score_spread":0.3174323742661871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318765825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799987,0.0005350558,0.000009929607,0.017569752,0.00049394346,0.00042075975,0.000021700751,0.000025703188,0.0009244272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940765,0.0000031696286,0.000004465423,0.00012897074,0.00018535751,0.00020459756,0.000007324455,0.000006469754,0.000052020278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971335,0.0011136126,0.0004624804,0.00017928838,0.00069124775,0.00041987593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988265,0.00046718091,0.00023754367,0.00028246647,0.00009727907,0.00008900294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016727188,0.00009633799,0.00018099969,0.000066513276,0.00045215111,0.00007154911,0.0005669378,0.000044950182,0.00017132198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028811043,0.00006236975,0.000082016966,0.00074840774,0.0005318419,0.00040816783,0.000056613313,0.00017606044,0.0000054749044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039271934,0.0004754821,0.14950655,0.000032323624,0.00001946166,2.69149e-7,0.22776572,0.00004295914,0.002054202,0.61423194,0.0016277814,0.004204034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011814114,0.0060805054,0.4510871,0.0003354141,0.000026120746,0.000005798715,0.3890712,0.0043806154,0.002300205,0.020079065,0.12476029,0.00069228985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023975777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005750825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59415287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104082486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020515469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376256284","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad012","title":"The Effects of Polarized Evaluations on Political Participation: Does Hating the Other Side Motivate Voters?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Turnout; Voting; Presidential election; Presidential system; Democracy; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Political action; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey data collection; Psychology; Panel survey; Demographic economics; Economics; Law; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.05873607098140151,"score_gpt":0.3964467472445019,"score_spread":0.3377106762631004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376256284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74894744,0.000052592015,0.0006210479,0.23714697,0.0032214052,0.0014326411,0.000019683795,0.00028440345,0.008273827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982308,0.0000018296595,0.000006538588,0.00031011458,0.0006456884,0.00018802796,0.000007360063,0.000011358664,0.0005982631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968631,0.0013279264,0.00036711752,0.0001651504,0.000617289,0.0006593729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956143,0.0036270602,0.0001373292,0.00026336868,0.0001843562,0.00017361023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950663,0.00009881036,0.00013458627,0.00006394805,0.0010866816,0.00025254468,0.00023440798,0.00007540353,0.000034519693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025208066,0.000051360967,0.00008687594,0.000549496,0.0003068917,0.00020512487,0.000012371247,0.00012568478,0.00012346577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007268861,0.000040732582,0.0044516856,0.000022091263,0.00002473253,1.4325109e-7,0.006042981,0.000001294415,0.000455774,0.98050743,0.0004690023,0.007976857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021444347,0.002263867,0.5318026,0.00043608746,0.00009866118,6.7182884e-7,0.018435834,0.0051911683,0.001845959,0.30264333,0.13438001,0.0007573974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019313208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67786413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077144956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014021686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8357987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392280840","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfad062","title":"Trump Support Explains COVID-19 Health Behaviors in the United States","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science; Campbell Institute; McGill University; Dartmouth College; Sage Foundation; Russell Sage Foundation; Syracuse University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ideology; Charisma; Politics; Scholarship; Political economy; Public health; Sociology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.08382456209823981,"score_gpt":0.4085302871351871,"score_spread":0.3247057250369473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392280840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4922947,0.0004261769,0.0010509986,0.49468264,0.005283889,0.0017026375,0.00026241277,0.0009625134,0.0033340298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532563,0.00021936782,0.000049177655,0.012480601,0.00034105987,0.00015681724,0.00082897773,0.000025597283,0.0005727621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965697,0.0009820225,0.00046652858,0.0003988352,0.0008081103,0.00077480543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987917,0.0003027408,0.0001019826,0.00032358518,0.00004370154,0.00043630943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003597994,0.00017076067,0.00018883005,0.00058035535,0.00066407275,0.00080075255,0.0006789133,0.000101248406,0.00049493724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012348263,0.00013013647,0.00008342264,0.0016234686,0.00021020096,0.00069286244,0.000018625225,0.0003019804,0.00015066151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000898447,0.0003273663,0.008883326,0.00010304261,0.00002616832,0.00003904999,0.6476302,0.0000047120197,0.0000026739176,0.1446641,0.16950974,0.028800616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026596992,0.0003314335,0.003742444,0.000028072476,0.0000030056162,0.0000025057184,0.061567448,0.00009858075,3.8965894e-7,0.004890562,0.92890453,0.0001650504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030404588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012075592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7593948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063750276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015269397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97605205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400098253","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfae018","title":"Autocratization Spillover: When Electing an Authoritarian Erodes Election Trust across Borders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Newcastle University","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Victory; Presidential election; Democracy; Spillover effect; Political economy; Political science; Politics; Mediation; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.052269411752802704,"score_gpt":0.40275662753714236,"score_spread":0.35048721578433967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400098253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517971,0.0006323376,0.042545088,0.059998874,0.012132126,0.0016696209,0.000056864952,0.0030147955,0.028153162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965082,0.000007016242,0.00015195586,0.000080211,0.0019868226,0.00006641294,0.00009660701,0.000026052367,0.0010767706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753606,0.00047823536,0.00037895195,0.00040772732,0.00044984734,0.0007491879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.00010359935,0.0000765966,0.00017276252,0.00019574407,0.00029855594],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013999459,0.00015471765,0.00016055128,0.00012719596,0.0011185085,0.0016487113,0.00016797241,0.00019916028,0.00026079873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002105062,0.00015502148,0.000075117765,0.00071454904,0.00010117667,0.0021247643,0.0000067881256,0.00021917587,0.00012029295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010511673,0.00009017482,0.006932205,0.000069651054,0.00003539615,0.0000011840893,0.040684447,0.000006380174,0.00045286815,0.7936811,0.0024812683,0.15555483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051412405,0.0017726228,0.028708724,0.00017620793,0.000030418769,0.0000073320552,0.013887888,0.029241398,0.00010847084,0.09948828,0.8250647,0.0009998213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02988514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027090482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82258344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032076912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036825263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401413198","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfae020","title":"The Trump Effect? Right-Wing Populism and Distrust in Voting by Mail in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Populism; Voting; Distrust; Straight-ticket voting; Political science; Politics; Legitimacy; Voting behavior; Direct mail; Democracy; Disapproval voting; Democratic legitimacy; First-past-the-post voting; Advertising; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.00835728870026388,"score_gpt":0.26148106654242653,"score_spread":0.25312377784216267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401413198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97391075,0.0014442897,0.000018495164,0.018036857,0.0032085006,0.0004294146,0.000035892648,0.00008922918,0.0028265535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991837,0.000042504216,0.0000102409085,0.00012367037,0.0001857716,0.00005097742,0.00002401283,0.000017694661,0.00036143226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746734,0.00047476232,0.00039065361,0.00039220377,0.00054440805,0.0007306037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990582,0.00051091536,0.000067643785,0.00016378588,0.00001895794,0.00018052713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016539781,0.00017379486,0.00019717982,0.00012631652,0.0006125868,0.0008279687,0.00037526293,0.0000840305,0.000039761628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013770029,0.00012951702,0.000036028105,0.00058736425,0.000115146584,0.0006418025,0.00003016097,0.00032871703,0.0000101866335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960935,0.00008443652,0.3277887,0.0002668033,0.00007588661,0.00011165052,0.040207863,0.0000019011491,0.00012673008,0.1387094,0.047908146,0.44468886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012202671,0.00019576968,0.1295506,0.00056423445,0.000009122221,0.0000050709364,0.013372811,0.0022569245,0.000025500478,0.0068380074,0.84521425,0.0007474315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8727655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7973061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009807022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071250997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79841214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410647496","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf002","title":"The Preference-Expectation Gap in Support for Female Candidates: Evidence from Japan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University","keywords":"Preference; Moderation; Social psychology; Psychology; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Conjoint analysis; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1243297238836331,"score_gpt":0.38579944499246754,"score_spread":0.26146972110883443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410647496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8379863,0.0008858644,0.009322469,0.089678064,0.0064696767,0.0028406053,0.00010203962,0.00017947979,0.05253548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968749,0.00010447464,0.00010916221,0.00011305608,0.00018632547,0.00023811913,0.000066375695,0.000004267608,0.0023033067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876386,0.00019646471,0.00025386966,0.00023033597,0.00022988209,0.000325582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988197,0.00069147075,0.00008509177,0.00018742113,0.0001477566,0.00006857837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067864696,0.00007266781,0.00009259986,0.00010029256,0.00049279124,0.00037858318,0.00028364334,0.00007172188,0.000046417084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035153975,0.000057902278,0.000046365345,0.00028083884,0.000104957646,0.0003996102,0.000011284793,0.00007007797,0.000017035674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006945872,0.00016132614,0.21323381,0.00006033144,0.00006492398,3.5562906e-7,0.23884064,0.0000053865488,0.00013589275,0.37274525,0.023366034,0.15131658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011810522,0.0003807544,0.39745903,0.00014762915,0.000017541928,1.9969768e-7,0.22073986,0.0012404621,0.00015417108,0.112994336,0.265332,0.0003529434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00996348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014713421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2597509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108491484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005218159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99662924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413104793","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf032","title":"Relationships, Trust and Accountability, and Critical Reflexivity: Developing Quality Data with the “Hard to Reach”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Accountability; Quality (philosophy); Function (biology); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.2507367311925055,"score_gpt":0.469733296868817,"score_spread":0.21899656567631148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413104793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59740525,0.00040925705,0.014664761,0.38136697,0.0003295718,0.0010298876,0.00012961273,0.0001996817,0.0044650217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123853,0.000022477276,0.0057503087,0.0022806164,0.00015090605,0.00005734176,0.0001700101,0.00001993289,0.00030989395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774396,0.00041653222,0.00040520256,0.00070371997,0.00038334276,0.00034722264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684787,0.0012552821,0.000061146005,0.001325856,0.00024985365,0.00025996644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028073168,0.00019812457,0.00034966448,0.00017529035,0.00038676476,0.0003083994,0.00030206246,0.00012846998,0.000016179647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018911319,0.0001362014,0.000017306267,0.0005733389,0.00031329523,0.0006422377,0.00020351996,0.0004899929,0.000016892078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006216632,0.00035777088,0.37932077,0.0011912091,0.00021977197,0.0000057833527,0.03035742,1.5422063e-7,0.00016354665,0.21754704,0.027990395,0.34222445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011284204,0.0005143876,0.8105685,0.0002620953,0.0000705777,0.000049143124,0.043532353,0.00020812896,0.0000075751764,0.0026562226,0.14071019,0.00029240703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022706448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005073834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4312477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093023344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5554132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413105486","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf028","title":"To Report or Not to Report? A Qualitative Analysis of Journalists’ Perspectives on Harm to Public Opinion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Public opinion; Political science; Public relations; Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.11643303122078606,"score_gpt":0.47360559196064306,"score_spread":0.357172560739857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413105486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17928414,0.00028626036,0.013883313,0.7705435,0.0031974507,0.0018661853,0.00008245476,0.00020030733,0.030656373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323624,0.00015890357,0.0014552019,0.001581201,0.00029619318,0.00027852607,0.00006874839,0.000013217021,0.0029117644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958978,0.00094303966,0.0010214048,0.0006336491,0.0010123278,0.0004917783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957335,0.0007170888,0.0005231134,0.0010588843,0.0014748245,0.0004926019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047649173,0.00020299683,0.0005945875,0.0015759723,0.0006717077,0.00036927313,0.00078020256,0.00010364396,0.00024006261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062691034,0.00017781714,0.0002589721,0.00590813,0.00012033074,0.00037198895,0.00011972222,0.00019603503,0.00003176476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019978726,0.00041010138,0.0013328587,0.000022547614,0.0009479725,0.0000099001645,0.7707827,0.000006896799,0.000058626836,0.1668766,0.029824562,0.029527409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002008736,0.0006780442,0.020196566,0.00008663546,0.00005424079,0.000002738002,0.58441573,0.000017049335,0.000009882105,0.00040540233,0.3936977,0.00023510691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003079458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004556764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8139521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046542363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006624701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7505155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417089030","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfaf041","title":"How Can We Size Your Core Issue? Assessing Salience Validity Using Psychophysiology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Opinion Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Operationalization; Measure (data warehouse); Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychophysiology; Set (abstract data type); Core (optical fiber); Construct validity","score_opus":0.1539296185902544,"score_gpt":0.4291466390266063,"score_spread":0.27521702043635193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417089030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7555128,0.00029891686,0.003629136,0.18641098,0.022799328,0.0005054965,0.000023993736,0.0003733372,0.030446045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932726,0.00008803658,0.0005560366,0.0017427532,0.0016154291,0.000026752554,0.00001080179,0.000013518209,0.0026740646],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764705,0.00054428447,0.00029261335,0.00052336074,0.00030143966,0.00069125515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987464,0.0003145685,0.00020419147,0.0003178879,0.00023595481,0.00018098946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005806332,0.00019606664,0.00032274582,0.000158834,0.0009361218,0.0006604156,0.0006143128,0.00029995685,0.00021914487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041796724,0.0001963864,0.0001422214,0.00088298955,0.0005736177,0.0007478462,0.000033291337,0.00027799388,0.00002533127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008595633,0.0008657754,0.035063073,0.00013777902,0.0002051186,0.0000102051845,0.09008992,0.0000010924917,0.027668877,0.23010501,0.078449436,0.53731775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090465444,0.00043145104,0.03645411,0.00012400428,0.00002205688,0.0000042254214,0.08880773,0.00015146454,0.00003870055,0.08551459,0.78695047,0.00059651944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020710502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049494265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70850104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019794532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040758593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8008405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}