{"meta":{"query_hash":"cd58372abc77","filters":{"venue":"Public Policy and Administration"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cd58372abc77","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Policy+and+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1996569128","doi":"10.1177/0952076711417747","title":"What's wrong with this picture? The case of access to information requests in two continental federal states – Germany and Switzerland","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Secrecy; Accountability; Law; Freedom of information; Political science; German; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Geography","score_opus":0.0364595014616272,"score_gpt":0.3376877850846028,"score_spread":0.3012282836229756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996569128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683228,0.000032404005,0.000015827936,0.014376286,0.000047273086,0.00025757315,0.000010141286,0.000013093694,0.016924579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985627,0.00009330831,0.000031594755,0.0010785066,0.000092191316,0.0000176517,0.000014967388,0.0000025331542,0.00010652942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932784,0.00007660614,0.00018124346,0.000089342706,0.0001516917,0.00017326554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995715,0.00006741938,0.00012881395,0.0000697777,0.000058477726,0.000104002596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048317364,0.00007575953,0.00008395619,0.00008984471,0.00024201139,0.0010120694,0.000111657224,0.000035191864,0.000045205623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007145171,0.000051861425,0.000009165427,0.0002275018,0.00014746148,0.0049004075,0.000038181555,0.000058478086,7.777479e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032466772,0.00014635827,0.30239493,0.00009941692,0.000046029254,0.000034384313,0.24836944,0.0000012765789,0.000031813976,0.4111916,0.0005424731,0.036817618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032604092,0.0008818876,0.74545175,0.00018036147,0.000042240423,0.0002829299,0.18973097,0.00048618403,0.0011081838,0.012896383,0.044932123,0.00074655074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030455258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14471346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44305685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027593356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018940977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107457940","doi":"10.1177/0952076709103811","title":"Changing Course","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Political science; Patriot Act; Terrorism; Point (geometry); Economics; Positive economics; Actuarial science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03905868781890607,"score_gpt":0.3717030595771768,"score_spread":0.3326443717582707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107457940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2760147,0.0001382827,0.0013833077,0.19713643,0.000094414056,0.00017941775,0.0000054440225,0.00023641041,0.5248116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512744,0.0000630166,0.00004541967,0.0021822234,0.00091322005,0.0000029659968,0.0000059664553,0.0000026817988,0.0016570531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992568,0.00007407744,0.000086568354,0.00010491329,0.00014094269,0.00033668627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968237,0.000036500925,0.000021975413,0.00005427056,0.000024395402,0.00018047304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046178524,0.0000565938,0.000059977276,0.00011598,0.0005942052,0.00019078619,0.0000671112,0.000055648874,0.00003148851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002307604,0.00005878052,0.000021748041,0.00032063865,0.00008702948,0.00034473426,0.000003462709,0.000074386444,0.0000065805416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002770563,0.00002903868,0.00027432168,0.0000014679882,0.0000024754502,0.0000011121203,0.0057671554,1.9777522e-7,0.0000874018,0.9056549,0.00007264257,0.08810648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006930011,0.00034214507,0.06283156,0.000024921208,0.000023423603,0.000019383411,0.006868066,0.00017588043,0.00054163596,0.0442408,0.8837785,0.00046070042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022049899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024924107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88370585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025454334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005068809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4570206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112330230","doi":"10.1177/0952076715593139","title":"Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Corporate governance; Politics; Policy Sciences; Phenomenon; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Public administration; Epistemology; Management; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.12475538290159219,"score_gpt":0.3343694926206265,"score_spread":0.2096141097190343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112330230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41023934,0.0013805672,0.0009423236,0.32383606,0.00008872322,0.00049837306,0.00011955653,0.000050387873,0.26284468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998859,0.00019663159,0.000015057629,0.00034601736,0.00034465315,0.000004066037,0.000001915421,0.0000039109214,0.00022878293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989729,0.0002083996,0.00017369226,0.00010797169,0.00028354386,0.0002535004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992389,0.0003140867,0.00010845747,0.000116377814,0.00007532728,0.00014682779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083523185,0.00007414846,0.00010463503,0.000052575917,0.00045794522,0.00010000066,0.00018028209,0.00005530437,0.000004096317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017387972,0.00004904239,0.00003305605,0.00032482843,0.0010418213,0.00023153731,0.000024283312,0.00010108627,3.0997285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007551821,0.000011751267,0.0017343414,0.000008040998,0.000010095723,7.682729e-8,0.02705734,0.0000051051493,0.000044820023,0.96970475,0.000040530824,0.0013755832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090744055,0.00042933057,0.021783223,0.00007837594,0.00006166744,0.000020220075,0.31703192,0.0009852515,0.00060559995,0.43406573,0.22368802,0.00034320023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025149306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58861965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012050281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001688986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114320929","doi":"10.1177/095207670301800302","title":"Devolution and Intergovernmental Relations: The Emergence of Intergovernmental Affairs Agencies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Welsh; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Civil servants; Government (linguistics); Political science; Central government; Local government; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024798269333168216,"score_gpt":0.29738911636416454,"score_spread":0.27259084703099634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114320929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76728487,0.0004952194,0.0006023919,0.006002383,0.00016827339,0.0002144349,0.00005366219,0.00001848379,0.22516029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.00017647122,0.00004653382,0.0000956571,0.000096584045,0.00001154833,0.0000017291842,0.0000028133124,0.0016608535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909586,0.00013321433,0.00019307487,0.000115633426,0.0002801833,0.00018205163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995859,0.000101398306,0.00012160966,0.00007067429,0.00002343207,0.000096933145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042531686,0.000064357846,0.00007149166,0.000019584706,0.0003317034,0.000065622735,0.000071205715,0.000047713052,0.00007216437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010691037,0.000050868137,0.000024436515,0.00013952142,0.00040096074,0.00036287034,0.000022938753,0.000053863503,0.000002306372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036517677,0.000018931398,0.0068558278,0.000005774401,0.0000066621847,1.7388633e-7,0.0016601176,6.82877e-8,0.0001840922,0.9901784,0.00035976496,0.0007265128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008092839,0.00048079537,0.2211409,0.00012098193,0.000045054996,0.000045742934,0.11817389,0.00026219164,0.0032495267,0.052229516,0.6029019,0.00054025225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028005736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032198904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9379489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030054018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42336482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122911303","doi":"10.1177/0952076714529141","title":"A politics of priority setting: Ideas, interests and institutions in healthcare resource allocation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Politics; Health care; Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.27320755876942665,"score_gpt":0.44861632073769925,"score_spread":0.1754087619682726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122911303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7573658,0.000458249,0.0019294622,0.23646806,0.00006151713,0.00032802307,0.000121103745,0.0000240623,0.0032436843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994182,0.000058430607,0.0006283343,0.0047292574,0.00021985962,0.00002614901,0.000064226224,0.000007555419,0.00008422078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754626,0.00025200183,0.001628453,0.00027805127,0.00005286998,0.0002423822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983986,0.00037724717,0.0007795076,0.00020848602,0.000048292157,0.00018784938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052304068,0.00010070135,0.0003448727,0.00039727744,0.000149479,0.0000723281,0.0000825038,0.00011500023,0.0000042350875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006459286,0.000132703,0.000023623501,0.00019461042,0.00012113613,0.00041152284,0.000032642223,0.000117624775,0.0000075975054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033395938,0.00003921308,0.0640446,0.00022364168,0.000004648207,6.8967815e-8,0.0006551204,0.0000024024664,0.0000025298039,0.93414265,0.00019865276,0.0006831474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012545519,0.00033361648,0.65047866,0.0001827662,0.000005398461,0.000028571823,0.0008648137,0.007855277,0.000030377641,0.19601758,0.14255534,0.00039306367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033421267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018328212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7381251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019259148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053098577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7732835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152111558","doi":"10.1177/0952076714524810","title":"The distribution of analytical techniques in policy advisory systems: Policy formulation and the tools of policy appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Policy analysis; Work (physics); Public policy; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Policy studies; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Public economics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.04707165716929342,"score_gpt":0.40570322827520694,"score_spread":0.35863157110591354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152111558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3311007,0.00040192876,0.0033051784,0.49294478,0.00012795941,0.0025208287,0.0004360832,0.00016582482,0.16899672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996941,0.0006712527,0.00001944388,0.00023548992,0.0013976152,0.0000924962,0.000064025175,0.000009693403,0.00056900544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966039,0.0010842765,0.00080486364,0.00025909932,0.0006392598,0.000608621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958818,0.0028131488,0.00042842285,0.00032357287,0.00027982995,0.00027324533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047928095,0.00018110395,0.00033771418,0.00057687995,0.0007304088,0.0005504883,0.0003744717,0.00022297325,0.000002652859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029323138,0.00012528151,0.00008470507,0.0018177825,0.0019217104,0.0008122635,0.00009787962,0.00023535354,8.012832e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096135125,0.00006117519,0.0006746101,0.000042946853,0.000014885441,1.4212203e-7,0.000900343,0.000002030748,0.000034565746,0.9584179,0.00011436333,0.039640922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004710697,0.0011158857,0.12316906,0.00022114684,0.000058314054,0.000051589108,0.007253415,0.019161044,0.0011025236,0.16461247,0.67768174,0.00086209795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024358496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020205423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019212705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004884634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160753590","doi":"10.1177/0952076712458110","title":"The architecture of community: Intelligence community management in Australia, Canada and New Zealand","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Intelligence, Security, War Strategy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Architecture; Government (linguistics); Exploit; State (computer science); Intelligence cycle; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Public administration; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Military intelligence; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.09938173709473573,"score_gpt":0.37235356911441103,"score_spread":0.2729718320196753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160753590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785717,0.000114053175,0.00006838936,0.009012084,0.000084406594,0.00021243724,0.000011207899,0.000009907607,0.011915774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976726,0.0002361034,0.000050290244,0.00018642489,0.00011416454,0.000006240845,0.000008103925,0.0000033313122,0.0017227174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984283,0.00073371857,0.00022288665,0.000053203672,0.00020970505,0.00035221997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905765,0.00042123615,0.00009005189,0.00018849685,0.000034096447,0.00020847644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015649132,0.00008903613,0.00009714605,0.00007376417,0.0007413729,0.00012623059,0.00027287102,0.00006270894,0.000010848895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032318177,0.00007459183,0.000012952011,0.00030559502,0.00039007005,0.00019792159,0.00007290605,0.0004104839,5.296232e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002339507,0.00012938735,0.013545453,0.000044948127,0.000030476736,9.3354896e-7,0.05193281,0.0000024437152,0.000010086468,0.8245081,0.0006951854,0.109076805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003082729,0.00029927684,0.32029474,0.0000661226,0.000036819296,0.00002505477,0.09455596,0.000018615414,0.0010315147,0.29868397,0.28418088,0.0004987622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98847044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52582407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086054824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065663515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5702116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163634330","doi":"10.1177/0952076714559327","title":"Power distance, sub-ethnic groups, and teams of civil servants: Overlooked factors of administrative reform in Kazakhstan?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Blueprint; Ethnic group; Public administration; Civil service; Corporate governance; Political science; Power (physics); Public service; Management; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.043770705714009095,"score_gpt":0.32951315529179026,"score_spread":0.28574244957778117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163634330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94521326,0.000037995567,0.0000684195,0.0014201242,0.00006467345,0.00014966163,0.000026682985,0.0000133674885,0.053005833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992153,0.00021073186,0.000029968383,0.00008641839,0.000039507562,0.000008142925,0.000018241604,0.000004786743,0.00038691875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896264,0.000087946566,0.0003877067,0.00019161054,0.00015100061,0.00021909301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937564,0.00010180136,0.00022547448,0.000103131046,0.000047318936,0.0001466299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070776185,0.0001007787,0.0002102646,0.00015195165,0.000088306224,0.00004787344,0.000088885,0.00009044867,0.00005884153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003429349,0.00009852121,0.000027818704,0.00026450373,0.00027462095,0.0004256187,0.00002622691,0.00007006845,8.1145777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008577085,0.00022265023,0.08925921,0.00006248717,0.000022178961,7.2700414e-7,0.024957968,2.2297014e-7,0.00027197207,0.8552821,0.000030514122,0.029804198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006458873,0.0002711928,0.96163076,0.000045449462,0.000004837229,0.0000013088165,0.013758674,0.000035117948,0.00035091644,0.0046212347,0.018432088,0.00020250371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013393951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03471409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87237155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017902625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006809798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98289984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163774099","doi":"10.1177/0952076710381933","title":"Policy Analytical Capacity in Changing Governance Contexts: A Structural Equation Model (SEM) Study of Contemporary Canadian Policy Work","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Work (physics); Public policy; Scale (ratio); Policy analysis; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.2353313019252247,"score_gpt":0.39067773798395217,"score_spread":0.15534643605872747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163774099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87483495,0.000024773706,0.00008452593,0.024101682,0.000039205483,0.0007112684,0.00010824938,0.000040998468,0.100054316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972651,0.000024543688,0.00006784993,0.0008095702,0.00051418156,0.000059573485,0.00002408804,0.000013955647,0.0012211282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698806,0.00043977945,0.0006289087,0.00039024066,0.00061176135,0.00094122416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.000144312,0.00027665208,0.000267606,0.0002092142,0.00082740834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015111566,0.00021875565,0.00032227748,0.0017472571,0.00058262574,0.00024369961,0.0003790539,0.00021270402,0.00003893336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036682526,0.00022954942,0.00006063468,0.0034466842,0.00050819275,0.0011923186,0.00005895439,0.00028781884,0.0000028137633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058538208,0.00020146431,0.026365208,0.000013554821,0.000021748654,0.0000057918533,0.026897985,0.000006519727,0.0000073533406,0.94380146,0.00004317634,0.002577169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065786173,0.002079462,0.74597067,0.00021205324,0.000044224613,0.00002631429,0.040134553,0.040288232,0.00028087158,0.15521641,0.00720057,0.0019680269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5301718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40096158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78858507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005925399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015036436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321608869","doi":"10.1177/0952076710391517","title":"Canada’s Senior Public Service and the Typology of Bargains: from the Hierarchy of Senior Civil Servants to A Community of ‘‘Controlled’’ Entrepreneurs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Public service; Hierarchy; Civil servants; Public administration; Bureaucracy; Civil service; Position (finance); Politics; Senior management; Sociology; Management; Political science; Public relations; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.08100504706003392,"score_gpt":0.3347550910688337,"score_spread":0.2537500440087998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321608869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80533594,0.000082993516,0.000027046406,0.1662521,0.0000555702,0.00065506465,0.0004394045,0.000012843217,0.02713905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961992,0.000105745596,0.000054783668,0.0031857383,0.00013587244,0.000044767403,0.000023494104,0.0000069546063,0.0002434506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627805,0.002055816,0.0005819299,0.00018634532,0.0004937993,0.0004040347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631625,0.002108195,0.0003885727,0.00043589456,0.00043023808,0.00032084848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027763678,0.00014430127,0.00040256768,0.0001405401,0.00062108284,0.0000917423,0.0006501489,0.000114698196,0.00011384584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054089795,0.00009519298,0.00006093385,0.0006951143,0.0011593167,0.00037242568,0.00017051355,0.000256441,5.907065e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006861526,0.00028132138,0.0096437065,0.0000516091,0.00017185144,0.0000011801543,0.035036523,3.0301868e-7,0.00037849537,0.94831,0.0010459216,0.0043929485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02148735,0.0017293495,0.5531904,0.00019499082,0.0003155273,0.00004083727,0.13958485,0.0006041418,0.0084301485,0.13309337,0.140151,0.0011780217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8845844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9495839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8152166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043126605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007842153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99778247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2410858807","doi":"10.1177/0952076715623356","title":"A qualitative narrative policy framework? <i>Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reform</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Qualitative research; Policy analysis; Salience (neuroscience); Sociology; Public administration; Political science; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05956910874749837,"score_gpt":0.4017234250371205,"score_spread":0.3421543162896221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2410858807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75913674,0.00016658174,0.0021232255,0.17531098,0.0000757301,0.00038910253,0.00008989214,0.00009303903,0.06261472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393225,0.0002816044,0.00030150884,0.0015416319,0.0015927674,0.000065676046,0.0000055695127,0.000019449319,0.0022595744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660593,0.0013377316,0.00049860246,0.00036315728,0.00049915095,0.0006954337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802,0.00088896847,0.00032401306,0.00031553555,0.00020953172,0.0002419494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020273493,0.00024568115,0.00031184938,0.00038899758,0.0012796985,0.00015291008,0.00036855307,0.00022884148,0.000035721256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045404606,0.00015757294,0.00009055479,0.0012922881,0.0019122543,0.00096474856,0.00004452259,0.0002599933,0.000005525452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032433392,0.000031021504,0.00021092918,0.0000100749,0.0000248194,4.8991797e-7,0.32991678,3.619528e-7,0.00049146806,0.66101855,0.00005549578,0.008207555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013148875,0.001030523,0.038864695,0.00043156042,0.00002626916,0.000019542822,0.4957904,0.000010112887,0.0023062588,0.32895863,0.13038278,0.00086436304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094212545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025085434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33205995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003901192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004725514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744921178","doi":"10.1177/0952076717724498","title":"Comparing third party policy frameworks: Regulating third party electoral finance in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Third party; Economics; Public economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08965338476716395,"score_gpt":0.36754791907773515,"score_spread":0.2778945343105712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744921178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391039,0.000029240373,0.000028222868,0.055631205,0.000082572835,0.00022078428,0.000005571949,0.000018966955,0.0048795072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981211,0.000016139495,0.000021194985,0.00084168813,0.00075516105,0.000032162352,0.000009851171,0.000005666163,0.00019702804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998352,0.00034120603,0.0003211127,0.00019749158,0.0002555353,0.00053265813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893206,0.0003420745,0.00025501978,0.00022058685,0.00007086059,0.00017938214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009511546,0.00011937614,0.00021278205,0.000081100305,0.0015306304,0.0007237396,0.00019115477,0.0001369036,0.000003898099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032591256,0.00009326754,0.000022585946,0.00029644527,0.00045498635,0.00047743236,0.000046185847,0.00030214846,7.893064e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022118096,0.000009178655,0.23020741,0.000009993548,0.000004654283,8.0218985e-7,0.0006622202,0.0000070508354,0.0000067137476,0.7681741,0.00014101366,0.00075472315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009218744,0.000041838466,0.92668647,0.00008772022,0.0000104036435,0.0000033455244,0.00025604496,0.0068523856,0.000055221135,0.04424271,0.020593597,0.00024837407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72393143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028482653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026272624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804139680","doi":"10.1177/0952076718775791","title":"Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Public policy; Subject (documents); Policy Sciences; Set (abstract data type); Policy analysis; Work (physics); Policy studies; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.049918247017945595,"score_gpt":0.43088379335723176,"score_spread":0.38096554633928614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804139680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25312015,0.00012142004,0.015615776,0.21995978,0.0003664202,0.0016007065,0.0004750062,0.00058579183,0.5081549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009806,0.000051269897,0.0007299679,0.002085064,0.0046319063,0.000097986805,0.00014222067,0.00001860893,0.0021448932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688786,0.00063074316,0.00039963442,0.00045691233,0.0006616182,0.00096320896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978133,0.00074791745,0.00012612098,0.00026138863,0.00031608256,0.0007351901],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020460854,0.0002211131,0.00019769695,0.0005165356,0.0018511824,0.001036024,0.0003233221,0.00023374606,0.00031853653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009722377,0.00021152094,0.00008031107,0.0010388293,0.001339645,0.0013196617,0.00008719,0.00023583336,0.000026286447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037796388,0.00012330679,0.0011202503,0.000020137972,0.000020257437,0.000001329457,0.0033444609,7.642603e-8,0.00017402113,0.9431394,0.0010826887,0.050936308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021811852,0.0011193942,0.0247302,0.000031823904,0.00005150087,0.00007249123,0.03125112,0.0011634014,0.0020745192,0.1821753,0.75405246,0.001096609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038683615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039901393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020820697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052578747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914784542","doi":"10.1177/0952076719827068","title":"Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Causal chain; Policy analysis; Management science; Focus (optics); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Process management; Business; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Epistemology","score_opus":0.054714983481806534,"score_gpt":0.3295057309291713,"score_spread":0.27479074744736476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914784542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17945151,0.00051748485,0.4021211,0.3809158,0.00032696247,0.0045636278,0.00018934764,0.0005117154,0.031402454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946307,0.00024058348,0.0021090386,0.0017536366,0.0006656189,0.000043938217,0.0000064116957,0.000023874869,0.00052619656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750507,0.0006266283,0.00024427878,0.0005170279,0.0003068396,0.0008001458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875134,0.0004369204,0.000118097814,0.00014482344,0.00010859954,0.00044021514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014202013,0.0002691244,0.00030153545,0.0006572413,0.0005960011,0.0007251224,0.00015164683,0.000249113,0.00001143144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002426274,0.00027498743,0.000035580855,0.0008122519,0.00027091274,0.00062192156,0.000052391297,0.0003185906,0.0000019962138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004266775,0.000038231665,0.00020248668,0.000028642382,0.000017266007,0.0000053526437,0.013486627,0.0000073579386,0.0027251395,0.9786132,0.000011416404,0.0048216074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004925243,0.003915428,0.011450227,0.0001908641,0.000114198265,0.00017943536,0.0689579,0.0079371035,0.0033916892,0.8903719,0.0063269422,0.0022390608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034804825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051703257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81517917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004022979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029835142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937730932","doi":"10.1177/0952076718814894","title":"Have policy process scholars embraced causal mechanisms? A review of five popular frameworks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Punctuated equilibrium; Mechanism (biology); Perspective (graphical); Process theory; Narrative; Policy analysis; Management science; Development theory; Positive economics; Work in process; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.07555246711590458,"score_gpt":0.4414505209563407,"score_spread":0.3658980538404361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937730932","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007965561,0.97188693,0.00031646047,0.0069607273,0.000118021824,0.0015222336,0.00018727157,0.0000843087,0.018916065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003227056,0.9916766,0.00009810779,0.0015819581,0.0010426135,0.00014423567,0.0002625587,0.000050852737,0.001915978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595815,0.0010004862,0.0009780481,0.00058142806,0.0007215715,0.0007602955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792564,0.00026475862,0.00068446883,0.00040802459,0.00025674535,0.0004603763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018309392,0.000476391,0.0016037051,0.00067700184,0.000489538,0.00033332926,0.0005721431,0.0011489217,0.0000811788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005472912,0.00043896513,0.00041226234,0.0013272596,0.00026900647,0.0007532664,0.00005469834,0.0013355112,0.000024218027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004654598,0.00006801769,0.000002392787,0.061954673,0.000106428706,0.0000032140629,0.0014668977,1.399117e-7,3.4649597e-7,0.48814228,0.00010437748,0.44814658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017221343,0.00013257409,0.000006876898,0.039221648,0.00042770905,0.000026016309,0.00030912829,0.000004700166,0.0000016837379,0.01123445,0.9479403,0.0005226964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018731271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003312177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021869453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938152507","doi":"10.1177/0952076718796548","title":"Exploiting conditionality: EU and international actors and post-NPM reform in Ireland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Conditionality; Polity; Public administration; Legitimacy; Rationalisation; Public sector; New public management; Opposition (politics); Public service; Accountability; Austerity; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03365226662926155,"score_gpt":0.3371079861214392,"score_spread":0.30345571949217764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938152507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.874884,0.00008704338,0.0000012948685,0.031939566,0.00006600132,0.00009170916,0.000032291733,0.000015073654,0.092883036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976005,0.0003943636,0.000021259993,0.0007039859,0.00025728997,0.000008473296,0.0000436261,0.0000026723383,0.0009678044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941176,0.000036878377,0.00012462406,0.00014052977,0.00012726049,0.0001589587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971455,0.00007539408,0.00004994727,0.000027209835,0.000052952204,0.000079947604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032227603,0.000056855533,0.00007857865,0.00009393709,0.00020209672,0.00022703635,0.000039619426,0.00005399392,0.000033303455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034378254,0.00005675481,0.000009747978,0.00009057553,0.00015509767,0.00062541454,0.000032651347,0.00006255443,0.000002135937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049071765,0.000103521,0.34270474,0.000060114002,0.000044795568,0.0000075440325,0.008810099,5.9550178e-8,0.00031629973,0.60701704,0.000930953,0.039955765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007930457,0.00011731786,0.9305577,0.000044741908,0.0000051418137,0.000026867381,0.016131436,0.000028354978,0.00003730889,0.007506586,0.04454719,0.00020427679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025777007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018746817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065695014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016453971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38967294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970080104","doi":"10.1177/0952076719869786","title":"Emotional labour: Exploring emotional policy discourses of pregnancy and childbirth in Ontario, Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Childbirth; Legislation; Emotional labor; Pregnancy; Convergence (economics); Health care; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.02986633612610421,"score_gpt":0.2961408826373924,"score_spread":0.2662745465112882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970080104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559856,0.00007798086,0.0000027823478,0.0067953165,0.00017953636,0.00025071832,0.000032491844,0.000008425456,0.03666717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919125,0.00073603075,0.000039407903,0.00006798841,0.0004027259,0.0000046500522,0.000042146,0.0000046430555,0.006789922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989419,0.0000871287,0.00022597157,0.00017101994,0.00026846788,0.00030552177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995055,0.000068737136,0.00010949392,0.0000777374,0.00007397861,0.00016451313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023503829,0.00008474516,0.00011964497,0.00018572927,0.0008075992,0.00006418322,0.00007321939,0.000057404177,0.000116449206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029466926,0.000079189405,0.000014815232,0.00024281417,0.00011916287,0.00055556116,0.0000021583296,0.000101017264,9.966697e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004121316,0.00006687904,0.084894605,0.000036019686,0.0000046694468,3.692728e-7,0.028731743,0.000001163842,0.0000011894258,0.8856754,0.0000074195113,0.0005764683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002618588,0.00006521783,0.90185523,0.00011861246,0.0000021261953,0.000005343496,0.0021004546,0.00000407285,0.000024470313,0.00594518,0.08949572,0.00012172159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87973017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004046792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07620735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9290297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990428547","doi":"10.1177/0952076719889100","title":"Puzzling Publics: The role of reflexive learning in universal pre-kindergarten (UPK) policy formulation in Canada and the US","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reflexivity; Policy learning; Legitimacy; Restructuring; Publics; Policy studies; Public policy; Social learning; Sociology; Political science; Education policy; Public relations; Public administration; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Higher education; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.012786425344682242,"score_gpt":0.2878936952842135,"score_spread":0.2751072699395313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990428547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456101,0.000066588174,0.000013435304,0.022117376,0.000023695504,0.00027673732,0.000003628774,0.000011094902,0.03187734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913937,0.0001047876,0.000006112671,0.00030216223,0.00017589472,0.000008964043,0.00000722576,0.000005661327,0.00024980635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986323,0.00042109768,0.000237428,0.00014876742,0.00023917822,0.00032123277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928224,0.00040273272,0.00010361379,0.00009127544,0.00004172441,0.000078399775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011134325,0.00008651749,0.00014001256,0.00020514599,0.00028055505,0.0001371388,0.0001448498,0.00006874184,0.000010865538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006653767,0.000063915584,0.000021444206,0.00059094664,0.00015906688,0.00053757307,0.000026179558,0.00026674374,4.0045256e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007326712,0.000011713642,0.19568075,0.000010649617,0.000009271947,4.187787e-7,0.022507844,0.00023699322,0.000051552714,0.7666072,0.000002448365,0.014807839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026979886,0.00011895873,0.87517285,0.00005546578,0.000014308103,0.000006977522,0.03764728,0.0136427535,0.000115427865,0.027447693,0.04278849,0.00029177358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95704573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96639824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7391595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027012223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004370857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77537125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005549329","doi":"10.1177/0952076720904434","title":"Strategic policy narratives: A narrative policy study of the Columbia River Crossing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Scope (computer science); Public policy; Public administration; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08003358689349006,"score_gpt":0.36986731569588693,"score_spread":0.2898337288023969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005549329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8949488,0.000021559323,0.000031393072,0.070923954,0.00003662466,0.00052692293,0.000027504168,0.00006258802,0.03342069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592054,0.000014500566,0.00002553732,0.0018100935,0.0015186061,0.000026728749,0.000004419403,0.000014523533,0.00066505856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974904,0.0008108965,0.0003912265,0.00033428983,0.00047567164,0.00049752195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897736,0.00011808956,0.0001998433,0.00017759959,0.00014315652,0.00038395385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046740627,0.00017622257,0.00025889388,0.00015864955,0.002371479,0.00087620266,0.00035920853,0.0001224576,0.000049205937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012897216,0.00016570611,0.00008515491,0.0018933831,0.0012406361,0.0005995348,0.00005804039,0.00029058263,0.0000027638034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034822213,0.000242988,0.0071192975,0.000024249764,0.00005029841,0.0000016835148,0.74584293,0.0000062384897,0.0004266209,0.24438463,0.00009647339,0.0017697352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030559048,0.0021942966,0.1524849,0.00006469174,0.000050394166,0.000010960797,0.76932496,0.00016913004,0.00019918433,0.04073549,0.03096946,0.00074064964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07456545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031943586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20364915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013160048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006925402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036044455","doi":"10.1177/0952076720929738","title":"The politics of senior bureaucratic turnover in the Westminster tradition: Trust and the choice between internal and external appointments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Politics; Public administration; Assertion; Public service; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06995192254907401,"score_gpt":0.3737838719475947,"score_spread":0.3038319493985207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036044455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73273945,0.0001531364,0.00007785759,0.25653,0.000027769298,0.00038290556,0.000047414112,0.000009775063,0.010031708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99600554,0.00017042062,0.000015818228,0.002366668,0.0010206867,0.000033197848,0.000008113043,0.0000046429022,0.00037490577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998143,0.0005821425,0.00035478445,0.00017542618,0.00043448596,0.00031011872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981852,0.0012720586,0.00014817719,0.00012145755,0.00004997849,0.00022313953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015226194,0.00011349042,0.00015038438,0.00006060173,0.00078441866,0.0007844536,0.00030020566,0.00007364783,0.00001116833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014320037,0.00006270056,0.00003588336,0.00030831507,0.0014322784,0.00043768456,0.000039237475,0.00024414755,9.819022e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004793165,0.000038342987,0.014436907,0.000026791036,0.000024722884,0.0000020106093,0.01584052,6.7463986e-8,0.00002268709,0.96341795,0.00028312148,0.005858933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005757863,0.0009631458,0.5830373,0.00009278311,0.00008876143,0.0000903695,0.024169607,0.0010988774,0.00022599532,0.10942607,0.2745617,0.00048750892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015000392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010247552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025150533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057034026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7564504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117658222","doi":"10.1177/0952076720977588","title":"Theorizing the behavioral state: Resolving the theory-practice paradox of policy sciences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Relevance (law); Irrational number; State (computer science); Positive economics; Public policy; Sociology; Deterrence theory; Hegemony; Policy studies; Action (physics); Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1217822465532858,"score_gpt":0.4488480486169806,"score_spread":0.3270658020636948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117658222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08652553,0.00022228394,0.00057624467,0.7839087,0.00006378581,0.00048668587,0.00005919276,0.00007561781,0.12808195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99153197,0.0002687799,0.000099935,0.0064258785,0.0010909921,0.00003056421,0.000005312631,0.000008277959,0.00053830305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646384,0.0014596599,0.0003913156,0.00028288324,0.00081432203,0.0005879972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648,0.0024629333,0.00029828525,0.00022356329,0.00019837602,0.00033687474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054280586,0.00014237975,0.00015159095,0.00014428605,0.0025177205,0.0010437907,0.0007941002,0.000082533195,0.000061488885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016945371,0.000088995315,0.00006983875,0.0017406391,0.00272872,0.0012177493,0.00012677917,0.0003077535,0.0000074721274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004260761,0.00005511962,0.00020590422,0.000006928101,0.000012724053,0.0000014185734,0.013500652,0.0000016239596,0.0001329046,0.9703087,0.0003562493,0.01537516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006053196,0.0010419181,0.0037982618,0.000028121289,0.000049733877,0.000036138503,0.07790965,0.0004613014,0.0013917324,0.17791246,0.7363174,0.0004479816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003544507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005474218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056761477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056737117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213379489","doi":"10.1177/09520767211065609","title":"Narrative policy framework at the macro level—cultural theory-based beliefs, science-based narrative strategies, and their uptake in the Canadian policy process for genetically modified salmon","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Narrative inquiry; Individualism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3332870004153435,"score_gpt":0.45713493258626503,"score_spread":0.12384793217092155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213379489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6673798,0.000113080714,0.0002102581,0.31889355,0.000053785167,0.0013204144,0.00039407157,0.000034679448,0.01160037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911742,0.00006961567,0.000060224345,0.0072536212,0.00038874825,0.0006115916,0.00022838333,0.000010895547,0.00020272711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975633,0.0008298571,0.00027292676,0.00032902486,0.00041829894,0.0005865616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845546,0.0005933473,0.00015974113,0.00029466584,0.0002345165,0.0002622513],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027306583,0.00019118084,0.00014707586,0.00039910612,0.008164014,0.0012292957,0.0006497247,0.00011580304,0.00010699535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016670505,0.00012814443,0.00004857622,0.0017293516,0.0017821093,0.00045724,0.00006195847,0.00032025969,6.246826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006910472,0.00005443679,0.00008466593,0.0000102181875,0.00000484303,2.7192556e-7,0.29879165,0.000074922566,0.00011922877,0.6942899,0.000038503298,0.0064622457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010237497,0.0005265295,0.022951802,0.000030847816,0.000011886335,0.000011374234,0.72312987,0.0031146256,0.00013131823,0.21798392,0.030595368,0.00048868306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06621504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62634695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5601319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000870711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014280558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385202728","doi":"10.1177/09520767231183506","title":"Varieties of governance versatility and institutions: Comparing the governance of primary care performance in six jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Multi-level governance; Business; Project governance; Network governance; Accounting; Public administration; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.11392971898919713,"score_gpt":0.3656893416900819,"score_spread":0.25175962270088476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385202728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9405374,0.00038919697,0.000008043273,0.030722158,0.000057207737,0.00012664463,0.000031382355,0.000020636147,0.028107315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611145,0.0036431085,0.000015555393,0.00008090811,0.000057020574,0.000013425491,0.000011762575,0.0000016057635,0.000065155175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933034,0.00006534966,0.00021259823,0.00008940338,0.00018205578,0.00012024539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956894,0.00009694598,0.00012763026,0.000077709105,0.000096030955,0.000032740507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045944625,0.000043902302,0.00009296054,0.000042869073,0.0002737497,0.000025760555,0.00007191138,0.00004814864,0.000002616574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002926333,0.000039141112,0.000010528222,0.00057614094,0.0003924332,0.0003054779,0.000024190618,0.00008210563,4.1304432e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085187385,0.00001734641,0.053772714,0.00014717192,0.0000027333115,1.03192065e-7,0.009111705,0.000001776866,0.000009580768,0.92197365,0.000019545598,0.0149351405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013547305,0.00003461914,0.94032925,0.000040433122,0.0000016794276,4.1940783e-7,0.004372381,0.000089971574,0.000044049943,0.0005874203,0.05432452,0.000039801846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012311131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012305389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92138624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008596389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001112614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6866696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}