{"meta":{"query_hash":"be4a03ae57b2","filters":{"venue":"Public Understanding of Science"},"cohort_total":84,"direct_labels_cover":30,"predictions_cover":84,"exported":84,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/be4a03ae57b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Understanding+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1824962959","doi":"10.1177/0963662507060586","title":"Experts’ understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public opinion; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Control (management); Public relations; Expert elicitation; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Politics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.5543987976542909,"score_gpt":0.43988476063267096,"score_spread":0.11451403702161994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824962959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26867086,0.00059879874,0.15923227,0.034472797,0.0020336742,0.0013571413,0.000053196858,0.00013116101,0.5334501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991557,0.0005113149,0.00006169481,0.00014410267,0.00003980554,0.0000042911493,8.181126e-7,0.0000065809963,0.00007571801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762523,0.0003056844,0.00043329532,0.0002448836,0.0007927811,0.0005981271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977283,0.0009827774,0.00040623764,0.00041156186,0.00029064537,0.00018046459],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009954808,0.00010443674,0.00021043244,0.0006319006,0.0015191018,0.00017688697,0.0011713636,0.000089506924,0.0001777308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028176848,0.000085025946,0.0000933815,0.0030296685,0.0061806105,0.0008887904,0.00016475865,0.00017767331,0.0000015945113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020937743,0.0001381666,0.0696898,0.000012015938,0.000007828452,2.3239717e-7,0.06422888,0.0000020407226,0.0023944275,0.8620984,0.00022356468,0.0011837201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022813645,0.00007082822,0.016237807,0.00015856662,0.000017949194,0.0000018875247,0.9249297,0.001781468,0.00016188998,0.039643258,0.014398224,0.00031709982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079554314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02474926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026934189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006836192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904970715","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303","title":"What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Theme (computing); Scientific literature; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.5649196279989956,"score_gpt":0.4116867703268896,"score_spread":0.15323285767210604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904970715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315499,0.0017390765,0.0017014124,0.23489729,0.00031130807,0.0004259979,0.000027226495,0.00014117941,0.029206593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868595,0.008731129,0.0011594908,0.00047930193,0.000011293453,0.0000036045228,0.0000018296233,0.0000028896336,0.00275094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984517,0.0000502151,0.000099357065,0.00035575387,0.0007529204,0.00029003306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.00005148037,0.00005981044,0.00022119054,0.00017583268,0.00017042684],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002005988,0.000081636856,0.00010429097,0.000209917,0.0025192597,0.0011685165,0.00035283674,0.00009825399,0.0004394138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017254984,0.00006916844,0.000023949966,0.00100301,0.010736283,0.0019101168,0.00012290422,0.00011496371,0.000003943673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025754798,0.00022038595,0.0021844315,0.000047978436,0.0000150274445,8.649575e-7,0.50118566,0.000009369107,0.037156858,0.3845105,0.01005367,0.064589515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008255707,0.00008778596,0.0009095988,0.00029715232,0.000023711802,0.000014381048,0.736725,0.05163463,0.00066322734,0.04941003,0.15877812,0.0006308495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022586712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015740126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33510044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019510432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016545142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966136681","doi":"10.1177/0963662511403039","title":"Risk assessment as rhetorical practice: The ironic mathematics behind terrorism, banking, and public policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Rhetorical question; Contingency plan; Homeland security; Contingency; Politics; Risk management; Risk assessment; Recession; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.17087508854613304,"score_gpt":0.39876971213486123,"score_spread":0.2278946235887282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966136681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10000826,0.00008284476,0.05344711,0.05654876,0.00065344357,0.0007236166,0.0000038125245,0.00014381815,0.7883883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99419165,0.00079968345,0.0041175256,0.00030608053,0.000087837674,0.000012339763,3.5238247e-7,0.000008228718,0.00047628253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713033,0.00022175953,0.00029298748,0.00033945616,0.0013895481,0.0006259218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985121,0.000264526,0.0003877202,0.00034275494,0.00019759922,0.0002952835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067471913,0.00012258711,0.00014686203,0.0004323032,0.0027576343,0.00075064343,0.000880257,0.0000621035,0.0004092826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002486103,0.00008959146,0.000049459286,0.0012448466,0.0050228667,0.002035373,0.0003201068,0.00023084963,0.000013534329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015733891,0.00013714306,0.002695676,0.0000059437334,0.000013476934,7.6574605e-7,0.06341279,3.193895e-7,0.000017029313,0.9314358,0.00033292297,0.001946509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043666418,0.00019797955,0.012046629,0.00002644515,0.00006761916,0.000011123352,0.6145955,0.00077323423,0.000012307322,0.29670894,0.07479493,0.00032866866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041278275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072605244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012460502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014054809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966157167","doi":"10.1177/0963662505047525","title":"Time and the structuring of ritual performance in the xenotransplantation debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Xenotransplantation; Environmental ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Public relations; Transplantation; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03953893554580601,"score_gpt":0.26641566368995995,"score_spread":0.22687672814415394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966157167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99284476,0.000083242834,0.0007194425,0.0039009457,0.000018404804,0.00016296536,0.0000022283523,0.0000059797035,0.0022620554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940413,0.00018729463,0.00025110607,0.00011531079,0.000008192187,0.000001626355,0.0000014451663,0.0000023790872,0.000028500426],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991562,0.00004719709,0.00019615103,0.00009662027,0.00035989797,0.00014395479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954295,0.00021136091,0.00007098864,0.00011028097,0.000037830257,0.00002660868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016782832,0.000051109273,0.000111699126,0.00019145543,0.00016169227,0.000026786432,0.00016503228,0.000016645623,0.000016726963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007151488,0.000027802333,0.000018768242,0.00051843334,0.002178441,0.00034592318,0.000010035152,0.00008669735,9.006467e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069614057,0.00039628724,0.050640482,0.0011070839,0.00010580136,0.000014578221,0.27634037,0.0013696133,0.37991682,0.26371938,0.00004694024,0.01938122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021157723,0.0006820473,0.6918764,0.0009298823,0.00019144706,0.0010874849,0.032423757,0.12959972,0.119324654,0.0018853596,0.00041616822,0.00042536083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011798723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009257241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6412359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054134103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012449978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80265564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981739046","doi":"10.1177/0963662513495149","title":"Public media communications about H1N1, risk perceptions and immunization behaviours: A Quebec–France comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University","keywords":"Credibility; Risk communication; Perception; Public health; Risk perception; Pandemic; Agency (philosophy); Health communication; Public relations; Population; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Environmental health; Political science; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Nursing; Disease","score_opus":0.1611894976693929,"score_gpt":0.3483433421483837,"score_spread":0.1871538444789908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981739046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87012887,0.00037491374,0.041023303,0.024819797,0.00040378765,0.0007114496,0.000032615855,0.00020980816,0.06229548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972758,0.00058323285,0.0017161404,0.000105524356,0.000022087099,0.0000067417122,0.000014784241,0.00000601762,0.0002696587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979641,0.00017722731,0.00038664107,0.00018518967,0.0008194764,0.0004673734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978954,0.00028115945,0.00036583532,0.0005029201,0.00055328495,0.00040137683],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022641248,0.0001039269,0.00016312618,0.00053420657,0.003474204,0.0013086632,0.0010510713,0.00007615445,0.0004607773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002204331,0.000101087506,0.000033809105,0.002065388,0.007295435,0.0052552656,0.0001962285,0.00020075617,0.000025404886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010093925,0.00013917245,0.086097844,0.000008438287,0.000008767975,3.1253386e-8,0.2237469,0.0000057345333,0.00029630287,0.67151433,0.001784106,0.016397376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054997095,0.00004589595,0.499503,0.00007856429,0.000024852907,0.000002016241,0.47172207,0.011027676,0.000031045634,0.010588686,0.006033981,0.0003922766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014660053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0145304045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6609256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048007639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007888343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984233276","doi":"10.1177/0963662506076138","title":"Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public actor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Ambivalence; Autonomy; Modernity; Late modernity; Social science; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.6134299573489076,"score_gpt":0.44679511623572876,"score_spread":0.16663484111317883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984233276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59629303,0.0004494559,0.048770946,0.17400698,0.0010560693,0.0014952009,0.0000145430395,0.000088039895,0.17782575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992501,0.00015861377,0.00024291409,0.00017262172,0.00004525011,0.000008090362,5.650412e-7,0.000003380108,0.00011845146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988366,0.000073370036,0.00021346389,0.00013337759,0.00043396596,0.0003092248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985239,0.00070130447,0.00023276886,0.0002558113,0.00021332472,0.00007292945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008095298,0.000053070537,0.000099528195,0.00013772341,0.0020315733,0.00024008665,0.000836769,0.000038063237,0.0000684503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017784364,0.000032505155,0.000049664322,0.0009973745,0.007208528,0.0006779556,0.00017899825,0.00006788415,3.192425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011823467,0.00002343932,0.0064777173,0.000013049996,0.000004123838,8.831991e-9,0.07419428,2.3009973e-7,0.0021781211,0.9098951,0.00007966703,0.0071224268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026893634,0.00006111342,0.042116553,0.0001451167,0.000027224882,0.0000027727951,0.76184535,0.002417191,0.00132043,0.050536957,0.13843746,0.00040048247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002195911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011334475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85935813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004119262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004079081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926764},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1984500656","doi":"10.1177/0963662508091806","title":"Analysis of an innovative survey platform: comparison of the public’s responses to human health and salmon genomics surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nerd; Genomics; Public health; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Biology; Genome; Pathology; Genetics","score_opus":0.7890295842147376,"score_gpt":0.5099727285029798,"score_spread":0.27905685571175776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984500656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947547,0.00002967111,0.0012382562,0.0021839887,0.000056006094,0.00017643985,0.00006177458,0.000011839691,0.0014873242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953634,0.0001707173,0.00016905816,0.000066817476,0.0000051950406,0.0000016197608,0.000023350081,0.0000034356942,0.000023496606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742967,0.000986494,0.00044765032,0.00020434713,0.0006681476,0.00026370471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978527,0.00042356394,0.00051340804,0.0003865844,0.000634137,0.00018959766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013173421,0.00007045651,0.00029924532,0.0009692886,0.0017855462,0.00007957197,0.0008129115,0.000040711107,0.00003147831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016844213,0.000059742593,0.000035408833,0.008792624,0.0043092538,0.0006121091,0.00020821692,0.00008660158,1.680404e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012685488,0.00010375115,0.83441275,0.0000072719527,0.000022132448,1.8431926e-8,0.14161181,0.0000074011627,0.0011768162,0.021624142,0.000025999434,0.0009951906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009034069,0.00010692837,0.9183501,0.00001009307,0.0000057212333,2.0671678e-7,0.080497816,0.00043054039,0.00008255923,0.00020130508,0.0001554173,0.00006897547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069438973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074991524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083937325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000543859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010202812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988131571","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335523","title":"Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: Five lessons from British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public relations; Sociology; Public discourse; Political science; Public involvement; Public engagement; Public participation; Public awareness of science; Science communication; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.41217215206023217,"score_gpt":0.4722221365860229,"score_spread":0.060049984525790745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988131571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7405373,0.00064005173,0.02421482,0.2205185,0.00021280306,0.0007740972,0.00007858823,0.00004378784,0.012980082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633795,0.0005032826,0.0019514585,0.00075648644,0.00002621323,0.000003824059,0.000008409522,0.00000423081,0.00040816274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997427,0.000090195834,0.00043634212,0.0003668894,0.0013767827,0.00030282693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926284,0.005100199,0.0002588072,0.00030990335,0.0015055798,0.00019709568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053019957,0.00006495018,0.0002681979,0.00011734564,0.00066522986,0.00069232757,0.00042722916,0.00012236135,0.00009094955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035751376,0.0000609206,0.00005026432,0.0012916838,0.012902501,0.00047056685,0.00012969605,0.00050414423,6.463539e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055456392,0.00018711698,0.015582257,0.000044418295,0.000040261923,0.0000062341715,0.0043177404,0.0000025443749,0.0008504183,0.97314,0.001745428,0.0040281364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028604886,0.0002850218,0.060917355,0.0002427876,0.000035647405,0.000018683735,0.012687176,0.0010811733,0.00015071812,0.92148125,0.00013151638,0.00010817494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017757306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073007513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25580066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020071314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001351016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897838},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1997466337","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335410","title":"In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Prima facie; Experiential knowledge; Public relations; Public participation; Biobank; Political science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.29838816263940077,"score_gpt":0.38839630512434764,"score_spread":0.09000814248494687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997466337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86598504,0.00012371768,0.0051728073,0.10556135,0.00018659468,0.00034182536,5.8706877e-7,0.00004108977,0.022586962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703497,0.00030555675,0.00035014164,0.0022135423,0.000030953925,0.000009727385,7.84488e-7,0.0000034687694,0.000050865066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976378,0.00023324962,0.0003434357,0.0003726027,0.00082552206,0.0005874002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924576,0.00010821317,0.00013928342,0.00022081025,0.00014351243,0.000142424],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005597124,0.0001111099,0.00013561438,0.0009667375,0.00091576914,0.0026136606,0.00077094353,0.00006361236,0.000058624664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009150154,0.00008974163,0.000022964696,0.003019589,0.0023522598,0.00692013,0.00008095361,0.00018276874,0.0000019783138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019433792,0.000119507604,0.0055060997,0.0000049569367,0.0000014739604,0.0000033206097,0.035482142,0.0000028372972,0.0012155849,0.9383353,0.00043803878,0.018888813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013597282,0.0001761616,0.39584333,0.00021127787,0.0000060166567,0.000009916227,0.445362,0.0018960721,0.000079595084,0.1017364,0.052600954,0.0007185553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030179656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003581673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073809066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045852124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984217},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2011153353","doi":"10.1177/0963662513490466","title":"Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Worry; Opposition (politics); Animal welfare; Demographics; Public engagement; Intervention (counseling); Welfare; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.9049595305333119,"score_gpt":0.4314383528755984,"score_spread":0.4735211776577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011153353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99111587,0.000034270386,0.0018638367,0.0060461024,0.000054022807,0.0006050214,0.000015275931,0.00002257258,0.00024302157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779683,0.00003283959,0.0020653396,0.000036780017,0.000036954447,0.000010387476,0.0000033602112,0.0000026173727,0.00001487553],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951247,0.0005746536,0.0005089841,0.00055138575,0.002171761,0.0010685142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977705,0.0009580077,0.00014189466,0.0002556748,0.0006200109,0.0002539073],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075897775,0.00015170185,0.00023950609,0.00036586807,0.0010737097,0.0010495596,0.0016089331,0.00008559376,0.00045841603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002021298,0.00006263759,0.00005348845,0.004771455,0.004312778,0.0016190667,0.00082268065,0.00042419194,0.0000032153553],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010582228,0.0004565088,0.036766164,0.000024118941,0.000011533591,0.0000015697541,0.00074595393,0.0001243381,0.8796121,0.0780617,0.00005308942,0.0041323365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047270147,0.0012202074,0.8569063,0.00015250899,0.0000088468,0.0000111204645,0.05565803,0.02806461,0.014728947,0.041847985,0.0003871114,0.00054161623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020154326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014453769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010721595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003870983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012209553","doi":"10.1177/0963662508098575","title":"Food, publics, science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public awareness of science; Citizen science; Science communication; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Biology; Science education; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1837613329618355,"score_gpt":0.3122339638260476,"score_spread":0.12847263086421212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012209553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05121347,0.0005394897,0.005922523,0.018079843,0.0013828102,0.00026270718,0.0000038406124,0.00019826449,0.9223971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857616,0.00009840966,0.0006096701,0.00026301746,0.0001246546,0.0000017558697,2.0274938e-7,0.0000032674943,0.00032287167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615914,0.00003726667,0.00024071995,0.0004214934,0.0021463495,0.0009950482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853784,0.00009611551,0.00015653837,0.00023552518,0.0005567334,0.00041725233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509982,0.00010971511,0.00018326685,0.00070413033,0.0054952777,0.00076048204,0.0015306226,0.000048891765,0.000060992017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029168732,0.000105191095,0.00005978862,0.006585342,0.02686643,0.0025660337,0.00012957439,0.00012356055,0.000005927344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012595024,0.00003922259,0.00061576895,0.0000014962015,0.0000024242722,2.7506564e-7,0.012258639,5.550146e-7,0.00045959468,0.98423386,0.0006856117,0.0017012722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005202786,0.00066479814,0.012854722,0.000047592916,0.000013094751,0.0000015344001,0.12376793,0.00015889527,0.0009885529,0.7967025,0.06364808,0.00063200935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043422758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000559581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94736266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002164063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025657797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957994},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2024455479","doi":"10.1177/0963662510363379","title":"Foodborne microbial risks in the press","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Homogeneous; Public discourse; Media coverage; Outbreak; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Biology; Media studies","score_opus":0.17883834142566918,"score_gpt":0.2801366180116121,"score_spread":0.10129827658594293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024455479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807131,0.00001764996,0.000037031943,0.008796037,0.00023970686,0.00011538296,0.000009048889,0.000016666741,0.010055361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968463,0.000007752349,0.00010028305,0.00012767967,0.0000617984,0.0000031609381,0.0000017034412,2.8937387e-7,0.000012708651],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989058,0.000036690482,0.00015607027,0.00021716439,0.0003570469,0.00032722048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995639,0.00017604802,0.00007267116,0.00008139432,0.000046100406,0.00005992074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019025062,0.000067665766,0.00008431581,0.000031575684,0.00043818096,0.00016656963,0.0009917081,0.00003775839,0.00007488674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016969976,0.000022163582,0.000035407134,0.0010912577,0.0015080685,0.00037211817,0.000096120275,0.00019845291,0.0000022913493],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014289692,0.00013414893,0.0037668082,0.0000042261468,0.0000021087087,0.0000016046071,0.00090012496,0.00000298812,0.8101838,0.17783722,0.00022295082,0.0069297217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009230673,0.0010519522,0.8406234,0.00004993162,0.000014871821,0.000065374195,0.023397624,0.000675027,0.04917963,0.03873463,0.044556912,0.0007276005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005053684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029859717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8368566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031776413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034017947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5556541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033947970","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/301","title":"Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Jury; Constructive; Public health; Public opinion; Political science; Publics; Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Process (computing); Law; Medicine; Nursing; Politics","score_opus":0.6234218180529332,"score_gpt":0.5204227652734262,"score_spread":0.10299905277950694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033947970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22973935,0.00008217548,0.023561668,0.5784511,0.00053915207,0.0005837133,0.00002534292,0.00017212173,0.16684538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978421,0.000097206204,0.00085695327,0.0010056485,0.00003552144,0.00000625467,0.0000044617163,0.000008537914,0.00014334777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960782,0.000042270705,0.00035904572,0.00039186873,0.0024798226,0.00064881786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943899,0.0032772573,0.000110293026,0.00031436255,0.00092698407,0.000981182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046369755,0.0000948232,0.00020488366,0.0017850129,0.00089807936,0.00026018702,0.0005182842,0.00030658772,0.0006513124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05318325,0.00008576573,0.000039871666,0.0034091037,0.006979379,0.0006732825,0.000044082826,0.0010868888,0.000026933985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008853795,0.00011850254,0.010623898,0.000043743505,0.000019362828,0.000039991155,0.0003496605,8.0411553e-7,0.0010527553,0.98585427,0.00021222315,0.0016759649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032225925,0.005585642,0.032158162,0.0066310843,0.00037220836,0.0012251708,0.115421824,0.14169621,0.008844766,0.6414799,0.011867163,0.0024919412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010946806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01729499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013250306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062255645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034078848","doi":"10.1177/0963662508097626","title":"Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Public relations; Representation (politics); Event (particle physics); Democracy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8892915425614092,"score_gpt":0.6111883534280442,"score_spread":0.27810318913336496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034078848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43434182,0.000032321917,0.06010814,0.47349924,0.00018283143,0.0011851973,0.0000045662177,0.000032504908,0.030613359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965189,0.000055911325,0.002382812,0.00092648104,0.000029142144,0.0000095107725,0.0000024636465,0.000004480018,0.00007029457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972211,0.0001093236,0.00048102863,0.00030511207,0.0015673024,0.00031615084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98538065,0.012799515,0.00023834097,0.00040117887,0.0010717614,0.00010858115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02218993,0.00006131831,0.00015830022,0.0005112715,0.00032328023,0.000100202196,0.00036641577,0.00015569937,0.000013574498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11468144,0.00004396892,0.000051621828,0.00194651,0.0018838742,0.0003625274,0.00004945575,0.00090918806,5.377264e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004226856,0.00009279136,0.0014796511,0.00004674395,0.0000030522658,3.4140064e-7,0.0013989545,0.000009134291,0.013547878,0.9806213,0.000038853912,0.002719043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000927597,0.0009823771,0.012193322,0.00052937213,0.0000076112824,0.0000029383107,0.010227227,0.008193646,0.023062473,0.94371694,0.000060536026,0.000095965974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016912118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059536676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56217706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042096083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014500602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89277595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047411715","doi":"10.1177/0963662508088668","title":"Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychological intervention; Public relations; Relevance (law); Science communication; Media coverage; Order (exchange); News media; Public health; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Media studies; Business; Medicine; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.49057877625076257,"score_gpt":0.4444615329357097,"score_spread":0.04611724331505285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047411715","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21086986,0.0008562603,0.0441505,0.6957496,0.0013076146,0.0019692744,0.00015145526,0.00006193654,0.044883493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982074,0.0011496998,0.00009118551,0.0004813796,0.000044257387,0.0000058200653,0.000004169398,0.000003135871,0.000012974824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963929,0.00045882852,0.00046922753,0.00028697305,0.0017667066,0.0006253573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753636,0.0008504058,0.00058568077,0.00046940107,0.00036425795,0.00019388048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018332405,0.00011250067,0.00028194708,0.0009127076,0.002209504,0.0006604329,0.0024193022,0.000045640412,0.000062357234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031628162,0.00007775294,0.00011486558,0.0041617434,0.007100484,0.0015655557,0.00017392145,0.00018663936,0.0000011276035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019181594,0.00011823348,0.002266675,0.00002105462,0.0000042596557,1.9340054e-7,0.089143336,0.000006434484,0.00044805737,0.90589404,0.0002502223,0.0018282911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010553404,0.00035206304,0.018695185,0.0004365246,0.000014088714,0.000003349328,0.8855987,0.0003045797,0.00004060148,0.08981189,0.0034762202,0.00021141872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005858761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012127814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8160822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017874686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012438823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052346044","doi":"10.1177/0963662506067662","title":"Parental views on pediatric vaccination: the impact of competing advocacy coalitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cancer Care Ontario; McGill University; York University; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Vaccination; Feeling; Public health; Vaccination policy; Focus group; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Immunology; Nursing","score_opus":0.16620912751457,"score_gpt":0.3706688252949526,"score_spread":0.2044596977803826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052346044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9244212,0.00015585426,0.0014722978,0.002405875,0.00019102122,0.00022553655,0.000007021134,0.000031480162,0.0710897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994511,0.0002537409,0.000062022285,0.000031535466,0.00012232528,0.0000031514185,0.0000012241035,0.0000038914072,0.00007098755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983236,0.00010570784,0.0002737088,0.00018797469,0.0007645815,0.00034438804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988499,0.0003668841,0.0002617116,0.0001913657,0.00021285113,0.000117250485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017042205,0.0000823072,0.00014687126,0.00030564633,0.0024331128,0.00007584589,0.00059409137,0.000028687517,0.00027350817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007181349,0.000057979,0.000113381306,0.0021802303,0.00047454963,0.00069572876,0.000058861944,0.0001007991,0.0000051092707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116688525,0.0002427434,0.6539466,0.0000159622,0.00001237454,0.0000024719443,0.047201745,0.000114327886,0.00018293763,0.29469538,0.0032894297,0.00028435595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007437409,0.00037311186,0.90366054,0.00004521907,0.000023558468,0.0000122580195,0.078650124,0.00040365406,0.00016833753,0.015047013,0.0005760315,0.0002964131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045163033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109399276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27964836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005589968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014250473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988656},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2056839815","doi":"10.1177/0963662507075649","title":"School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Public awareness of science; Promotion (chess); Science education; Science, technology, society and environment education; Science communication; Social science education; Sociology; Literacy; Political science; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering ethics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.183257703049856,"score_gpt":0.421375110627949,"score_spread":0.23811740757809302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056839815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87253463,0.00010341126,0.011308649,0.025367405,0.0041632224,0.0006975269,0.000005857595,0.000113399845,0.085705884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486154,0.00002065944,0.0008966659,0.0010523848,0.00009179236,0.0000035294554,3.1455227e-7,0.000005429215,0.0030676627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943183,0.00006451302,0.00034723603,0.0008230711,0.003142479,0.0013043869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952619,0.00069306063,0.00023254953,0.0003435659,0.0018757525,0.0015931701],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028252512,0.00013520659,0.00017972046,0.002127702,0.007249612,0.0031651289,0.0017292388,0.000054349402,0.00043181804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025892595,0.0001181681,0.000028718336,0.012738473,0.01684985,0.0063599753,0.00030159214,0.00015108343,0.00004969678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005394385,0.00010056017,0.007831092,0.000014873425,0.0000041987214,0.0000033136737,0.085506745,0.000003035725,0.03579979,0.861391,0.0021121763,0.0071792523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013917468,0.000380439,0.03124667,0.00020491361,0.000021125581,0.000024895631,0.64592713,0.00080319575,0.019218381,0.016876355,0.28273413,0.0011710145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023160751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008467919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84451467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017276893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009964095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059720664","doi":"10.1177/0963662512444682","title":"Progress, decline, and the public uptake of climate science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Conservatism; Climate change; Blame; Narrative; Global warming; Divergence (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perception; Public opinion; Social psychology; Political economy; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.5307798169057809,"score_gpt":0.4478265359944933,"score_spread":0.08295328091128762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059720664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6645588,0.0015650529,0.0011747478,0.07822157,0.0009334416,0.0006988122,0.000012678099,0.00010414765,0.25273076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931005,0.0060704155,0.0006340649,0.00012328368,0.00004402518,0.000007967882,9.0602913e-7,0.0000037711332,0.000015026156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976683,0.000116303236,0.0002850326,0.00018335547,0.0011010363,0.00064593594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985251,0.00023297369,0.00027197908,0.00035666424,0.00035574884,0.00025752516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016115503,0.000073639334,0.0001425611,0.00037204995,0.0027827674,0.00040390572,0.0011920248,0.000035838293,0.00010369723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014790754,0.00005257187,0.00003555633,0.0029053641,0.043453366,0.0023292543,0.00053792883,0.00008843854,0.0000029118166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006350792,0.00004322289,0.030184224,0.000010864905,0.0000014755718,1.4395568e-8,0.020030107,4.5664713e-8,0.00020881832,0.9411606,0.0000145515505,0.008339687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032165179,0.00014469665,0.22630805,0.0002121549,0.000060271723,0.000018214816,0.5728599,0.0026609665,0.00041891908,0.059619114,0.13368459,0.00079663587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008259291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002648946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88154155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027497654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055277627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061854397","doi":"10.1177/0963662514563888","title":"Voices from other lands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Media studies; Kingdom; Political science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.4430785820135099,"score_gpt":0.40479552965437265,"score_spread":0.03828305235913726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061854397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586306,0.00016045132,0.002506206,0.0011907932,0.0008112526,0.000049798135,0.000013772713,0.00004488248,0.13659227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998687,0.0000018229963,0.00020427104,0.00010508777,0.00006965777,0.0000020202199,0.0000016685552,0.0000038741923,0.0009245896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989782,0.000023950228,0.00012726254,0.00023603547,0.00037586165,0.00025868975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994386,0.000052500553,0.0000837422,0.00018297107,0.00007826711,0.00016391338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005184551,0.00006936956,0.0001075596,0.00012209681,0.00013115232,0.0001299348,0.00043501143,0.000034064178,0.0006557345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090915055,0.00004836173,0.000026602182,0.0005321216,0.0010768027,0.00037455672,0.00006245078,0.0000552028,0.00005420669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028565264,0.0001122035,0.2814155,0.000004238073,0.00003580956,0.000002104027,0.029539062,0.0000017564836,0.0024233605,0.67813504,0.006992201,0.001310141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028720582,0.00062097335,0.32553273,0.0000984036,0.000044873064,0.000014226813,0.29343778,0.0012581417,0.001352878,0.34131497,0.032633904,0.0008190786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011273654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010933538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3368201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010817329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085020125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7179833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062160663","doi":"10.1177/0963662510394949","title":"Post-ecological discourse in the making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10116573810507386,"score_gpt":0.30952421107614275,"score_spread":0.2083584729710689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062160663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073568,0.000003506731,0.0009603963,0.0032989124,0.00007554389,0.00016263442,7.628638e-7,0.000009210432,0.08813221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.0000013266914,0.00062396866,0.000513341,0.0000035264425,0.00000812761,2.6328547e-7,0.0000022234838,0.00004752271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874455,0.000060193408,0.00016187188,0.0002513206,0.00046197156,0.00032007377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995857,0.0000513886,0.000065638225,0.0002411325,0.0000055606733,0.000050617906],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001954843,0.00006672879,0.000068124275,0.00007906264,0.0002980151,0.000041270603,0.0007253249,0.000023678504,0.0019463282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028507688,0.000043492262,0.000026741174,0.00079596776,0.005503134,0.0005906587,0.00020553978,0.00010277325,0.000019916868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007899138,0.00057225226,0.88585377,0.0000046775776,9.85325e-7,0.0000038614685,0.028587881,0.000014796033,0.001215475,0.08266794,0.00010096587,0.0009694811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076037,0.000058471163,0.8695267,0.0000025424404,0.0000014817145,0.000005039842,0.11436345,0.00012618367,0.00008092843,0.015571457,0.00011761471,0.000070111324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108389664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011750104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09144288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000808922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053576907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062652729","doi":"10.1177/0963662504044559","title":"Engaging the public in the regulation of xenotransplantation: would the Canadian model of public consultation be effective in the US?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Public consultation; Xenotransplantation; Public opinion; Public relations; Elite; Political science; Value (mathematics); Public domain; Public administration; Transplantation; Medicine; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2526097649308369,"score_gpt":0.33847074226323237,"score_spread":0.08586097733239545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062652729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7927654,0.000015151279,0.03356875,0.16751374,0.00019139439,0.0013510688,0.00003671597,0.000016323529,0.004541465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724126,0.000016139184,0.00008558405,0.0025701374,0.0000123086475,0.00005834669,0.000004083857,0.0000066240023,0.0000055296896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964166,0.0006059129,0.00055720104,0.00035449446,0.0015834412,0.00048234608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963752,0.0023795117,0.00041640602,0.0004693798,0.00029598287,0.00006353878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008865498,0.00012742035,0.00014233535,0.00084872486,0.0013587533,0.00033064003,0.0016879793,0.0000808317,0.000009198887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056739557,0.00006952151,0.000038536564,0.006843424,0.0074588126,0.0011774717,0.000053488424,0.00074734323,5.454716e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004378275,0.000071529306,0.0006743778,0.000022663175,0.0000024673736,7.1366696e-7,0.025973974,0.0015973363,0.062715225,0.90872216,0.000013235156,0.00020196021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036403732,0.0003625059,0.07150734,0.0003293473,0.000043401127,0.00005930826,0.08511619,0.081574045,0.119185105,0.63726014,0.00032738372,0.0005948435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002884572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039806567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.271462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006166362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015540514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994135},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2063030201","doi":"10.1177/0963662507076603","title":"The meanings of genomics: a focus group study of “interested” and lay classifications of salmon genomics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Realm; Phenomenon; Genomics; Conflation; Focus group; Focus (optics); Psychology; Sociology; Data science; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Genetics; Genome","score_opus":0.615727767013,"score_gpt":0.4113988937783352,"score_spread":0.2043288732346648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063030201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891351,0.00012494306,0.0009954729,0.0014358,0.00006106102,0.00024843385,0.0000068993245,0.000009626845,0.007982677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971755,0.0025489556,0.0002309141,0.0000063679336,0.000008497173,0.000003792087,8.2749966e-7,0.0000037560658,0.000021378268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988252,0.00011586151,0.0003551532,0.00014310154,0.0003961442,0.00016456607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986004,0.00032721835,0.00043876408,0.00030948038,0.0002588342,0.00006526427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020144656,0.00005475839,0.00014298536,0.00020933218,0.0010341704,0.00003686457,0.00066770473,0.00003107728,0.0000152374905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035798474,0.00004569867,0.000030388692,0.0007978695,0.0062238784,0.00028451675,0.00014981325,0.00006323388,2.5119687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033159697,0.00048819132,0.03755903,0.000028607636,0.000025774138,1.3648771e-7,0.57822007,0.000005607296,0.065481864,0.31501168,0.00005911836,0.0030867471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004909083,0.00029998677,0.03646813,0.000043562297,0.000019310954,0.0000021806425,0.9544035,0.00049161154,0.00053976366,0.005758777,0.0013670275,0.00011521901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012194621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049860966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37618345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027093667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023844701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067747683","doi":"10.1177/0963662511412861","title":"The weight of communication: The <i>Canadian Medical Association Journal</i>’s discourse on obesity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Ideology; Rhetoric; Politics; Context (archaeology); Obesity; Association (psychology); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Exploratory research; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Media studies; Psychology; Medicine; Law; History; Pathology","score_opus":0.20865509824461292,"score_gpt":0.42792556798092374,"score_spread":0.2192704697363108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067747683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10844963,0.00044627461,0.0005792875,0.31374604,0.0022897485,0.0006506794,0.0000106538555,0.000027828542,0.57379985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970225,0.0008128853,0.00009716754,0.0014957753,0.00008983362,0.0000056774293,2.9791985e-7,0.000004062272,0.0004717629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963293,0.00090865354,0.00049236947,0.00011591269,0.0016105344,0.0005432444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947303,0.0029079635,0.00095082313,0.00044575808,0.00058652484,0.0003786337],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02641803,0.00006610585,0.00013208552,0.00016938281,0.012544329,0.00006592863,0.001466254,0.00015068644,0.000955511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044737128,0.000036167225,0.000038273924,0.00073592016,0.0023575688,0.0007049325,0.00014268617,0.0012777166,0.000051671374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015246185,0.00008613068,0.09080783,0.000027053331,0.000017310333,6.938935e-7,0.015538374,2.328083e-7,0.0000038387066,0.87989146,0.013110398,0.0005014669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013213549,0.00035093582,0.42475566,0.0010893869,0.000065910186,0.000015481231,0.25552943,0.0005129693,0.00010141255,0.1153111,0.2006351,0.00031125473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008048087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14643073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88857293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013082903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066343504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070091809","doi":"10.1177/09636625030122001","title":"University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northwestern Polytechnic; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Reading (process); Psychology; Scientific literacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Science education; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.23096740584485512,"score_gpt":0.40443844809828916,"score_spread":0.17347104225343404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070091809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980868,0.000042311458,0.0026700634,0.00056014943,0.0004621564,0.00015752843,0.0000016321563,0.0000109385755,0.015227261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935305,0.000023681074,0.0004188268,0.000010193191,0.000008025788,5.39343e-7,2.1716556e-7,0.0000020734176,0.00018340639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.00013673038,0.00027153856,0.00035621406,0.00089893694,0.00029435076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978894,0.0006000356,0.00028344357,0.00014941236,0.00077983935,0.00029785404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009066671,0.00006781203,0.00014084073,0.0009122659,0.0010924775,0.0001355764,0.00047278934,0.000036042617,0.00001954535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010195172,0.00006802041,0.000016111584,0.004088553,0.007822215,0.0015104531,0.00014065581,0.00008242161,5.1373763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052350088,0.00005923789,0.08774001,0.000016887525,0.0000024025105,3.5580305e-7,0.109746665,0.0000024309236,0.0038595144,0.79820794,0.000029506065,0.00032981276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023913465,0.0000981583,0.17772636,0.00016560733,0.000016114744,0.000009241302,0.8069147,0.00026660532,0.002141047,0.011689045,0.0005326406,0.00020138407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012590192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006382233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7865189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005660065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001886227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083539232","doi":"10.1177/0963662505054560","title":"Book Review: The Genetic Imaginary: DNA in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0350899771419827,"score_gpt":0.27324036364467896,"score_spread":0.23815038650269627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083539232","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1270414,0.56903166,0.009598799,0.17914145,0.0014751481,0.0025830495,0.000052144987,0.000048930196,0.11102744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821103,0.0054170876,0.0002510337,0.0118610645,0.00014663757,0.000012226279,0.0000037500076,0.0000073328174,0.00019053745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985132,0.00008858386,0.00022382499,0.00030920058,0.00041576312,0.00044942717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991366,0.000026451995,0.00009405495,0.00049884437,0.000115033654,0.00012898284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018501801,0.000109581146,0.00010893175,0.00007697439,0.0008276854,0.00012862183,0.0009916165,0.000050967934,0.000012605336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017648496,0.000072058145,0.00005958981,0.00045448574,0.0018434302,0.000020117082,0.0000798549,0.0001172958,0.00000371126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023306397,0.00017865218,0.002165378,0.0022616857,0.000063584564,0.000021180555,0.014943868,0.00040080337,0.03384024,0.0382297,0.90543807,0.0024335524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007199399,0.00031650468,0.005519875,0.00049673935,0.00032924075,0.00030060177,0.05508154,0.003530583,0.0044246702,0.00026636498,0.92832744,0.00068649097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010309452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008016645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035554834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008947171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67921954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086139813","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414982","title":"The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Cardiff University","keywords":"Drama; Sociology; Science communication; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Focus group; Focus (optics); Human cloning; Public relations; Science education; Pedagogy; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.5671756946719387,"score_gpt":0.44082014414216014,"score_spread":0.1263555505297786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086139813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48039868,0.00026345637,0.0014438019,0.009126812,0.00039600444,0.000485694,0.000004192633,0.00007506219,0.5078063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956676,0.0033109721,0.00078644,0.00007557948,0.0000110286,0.0000055898877,0.0000017404814,0.0000043281407,0.00013676143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772733,0.00012835902,0.0003277097,0.0002101106,0.0011854797,0.00042102506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795705,0.00031706176,0.0003391977,0.00076032244,0.00045915623,0.00016718313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008139046,0.00007774758,0.00011063626,0.00037599052,0.0054886322,0.00028481195,0.002680667,0.00003880979,0.00030733843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010552763,0.000060964736,0.00004707127,0.00253873,0.0281323,0.0021185572,0.00047903706,0.00012360001,0.00000950339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013158226,0.00007469636,0.0023171718,0.000007596463,0.0000028824668,6.974378e-8,0.10749134,1.8022338e-7,0.0028862192,0.8747801,0.00008550329,0.012341081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000420037,0.0001987742,0.0116996,0.0001723722,0.000016348942,0.000003680982,0.6810723,0.0005368606,0.0031907335,0.28751272,0.014886914,0.0002896836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024859963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020374397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5872674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076080736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010663623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089501922","doi":"10.1177/0963662510384461","title":"Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Newspaper; Public opinion; Political science; Scientific publishing; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.5880613633378229,"score_gpt":0.4714212013915512,"score_spread":0.11664016194627169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089501922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676279,0.00019800103,0.00047547038,0.014737566,0.00033216408,0.0002156681,0.000052490872,0.000063780935,0.016296992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971629,0.0022160728,0.00045629297,0.00007483323,0.000023622482,0.0000058616415,0.000013726314,0.0000072803814,0.00003944189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658275,0.00025281988,0.00045854732,0.0003711032,0.0016257125,0.0007090934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996187,0.00048518184,0.00048963266,0.00079405337,0.0016605488,0.00038363587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023938343,0.00011619168,0.00021641002,0.00059097784,0.004543836,0.0021905252,0.0031501509,0.00014892982,0.00015135849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109054865,0.00011743748,0.000028627737,0.0046637626,0.033874005,0.008681203,0.00091048906,0.00054178573,0.000001979384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008453426,0.00008170586,0.22083738,0.000028289194,0.000004355897,7.9508716e-8,0.08147538,4.2867478e-7,0.006424665,0.6868927,0.00012013799,0.0041264584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009319595,0.00011821895,0.3167082,0.00017791874,0.000013407861,0.0000097700495,0.63313365,0.0012467204,0.0005157638,0.027727425,0.018718561,0.0006983869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068223337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04973115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65916526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043694043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018136611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997913},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2091751676","doi":"10.1177/0963662510364201","title":"Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore–Hansen disagreement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Representation (politics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.679273851901187,"score_gpt":0.48942157437090733,"score_spread":0.18985227753027972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091751676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83463234,0.00013815978,0.0003520596,0.0934712,0.0019206231,0.000601901,0.000017013366,0.00005196811,0.06881474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642086,0.003306197,0.00007257556,0.00007392346,0.000093759154,0.000015163001,0.0000025155998,0.000003135917,0.000011870781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988528,0.000077465236,0.0001434724,0.00017262746,0.0004327044,0.00032094415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993514,0.00017620985,0.000091684225,0.00023705632,0.00004505858,0.00009861659],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035136237,0.000058893827,0.000076070064,0.00018288796,0.0011803897,0.0002274763,0.00051713525,0.000037179205,0.00012228804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028503637,0.00004343282,0.00001760924,0.00082193705,0.004552459,0.00073842733,0.00017267399,0.00014015756,0.0000024743094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036954314,0.00003959122,0.029347144,0.000011715819,8.7248037e-7,5.4090016e-8,0.07820608,1.05304075e-7,0.0007291771,0.88013154,0.00002185743,0.011508182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070067885,0.000076004966,0.23677187,0.00016424108,0.0000079927595,0.0000029729006,0.7092012,0.0015542302,0.000039415037,0.0355897,0.015526776,0.00036488494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006361215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007856899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84454185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016846701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008538182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097298859","doi":"10.1177/0963662509351638","title":"Extending the reach of research as a public good: Moving beyond the paradox of “zero-sum language games”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Zero-sum game; Sociology; Zero (linguistics); Public relations; Game theory; Intersection (aeronautics); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Linguistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.12754353179383815,"score_gpt":0.36159367717987445,"score_spread":0.2340501453860363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097298859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55675167,0.0008604502,0.000327213,0.00862714,0.00054894976,0.00029031397,0.000021014082,0.000037126592,0.4325361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998015,0.000038421636,0.00009394146,0.00006160814,0.00013709841,0.00001301851,0.0000015588854,0.000013428964,0.0016259303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965644,0.0001512699,0.00046061657,0.00035065188,0.0018212908,0.0006517807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706674,0.000995918,0.00039247787,0.00084409636,0.00061215623,0.00008864517],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009082805,0.00014762268,0.0002975277,0.000781994,0.0019156883,0.00060579117,0.0018910355,0.000036499227,0.00063989754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002400003,0.00008203079,0.00013425694,0.0012614004,0.019928142,0.00096037396,0.00058538833,0.0004941555,0.000004815144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036752044,0.00006256006,0.0007301548,0.00002864053,0.000058724712,0.0000015231929,0.07735641,0.0000012195179,0.006402312,0.91385704,0.0005645619,0.00093319523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002449687,0.00012608801,0.0005228926,0.000096459975,0.000062986575,0.000009540853,0.905628,0.0003777883,0.0033179787,0.0836233,0.0057777767,0.00021222235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000882416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019814896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83023375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010876162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037408608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098428202","doi":"10.1177/0963662510389977","title":"Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Credibility; Assertion; Situated; Social media; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Relevance (law); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Science communication; Social science; Media studies; Geography; Science education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.2064546613661575,"score_gpt":0.35814849699906937,"score_spread":0.15169383563291186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098428202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97347164,0.00013431195,0.00011286415,0.0051933317,0.00032166223,0.00052032585,0.000020829582,0.000004140894,0.020220907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940497,0.00045157233,0.000011004581,0.00009496761,0.000009107528,0.000012642785,0.000002389723,8.293875e-7,0.000012525591],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998966,0.0001378445,0.00021178258,0.0000668161,0.00049117504,0.00012640514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883026,0.0006478,0.00019670936,0.00024143652,0.000057234603,0.000026557569],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007303512,0.000037987134,0.0000772874,0.0001274992,0.0008306908,0.00014084068,0.0006936404,0.000023785784,0.000079562575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044499946,0.000019860705,0.000024555497,0.00056767627,0.014518163,0.00061598944,0.00011027215,0.00010164986,0.0000011131425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010172131,0.00005006802,0.0020379517,0.00000637881,0.0000018668763,5.736033e-9,0.49890402,5.498027e-7,0.0052150837,0.4874721,0.0000694557,0.006232364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007661069,0.000027311125,0.009046388,0.000013704225,0.0000060488032,2.983182e-7,0.97127587,0.00083832163,0.0002916964,0.0086487895,0.009038735,0.00004673424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000290342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003358055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47882327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093236864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012532239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98816377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103628484","doi":"10.1177/0963662506059259","title":"When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Alzheimer's disease research and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Perspective (graphical); Disease; Reflexivity; Population; Family aggregation; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Biology; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Pathology; Gene","score_opus":0.12665422455900074,"score_gpt":0.3536581988586312,"score_spread":0.22700397429963046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103628484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602002,0.0013903454,0.00032095192,0.010067791,0.00003397952,0.00048697804,0.000005883015,0.000018072542,0.027475836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994532,0.000024654648,0.00038146297,0.0000839718,0.000025066951,0.000011072813,0.000002695088,0.0000049228893,0.0000129824575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997999,0.000060756563,0.000217389,0.00035683738,0.0008628644,0.0005031659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992588,0.00015790983,0.000060712675,0.00027031224,0.0001403598,0.00011187948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018900245,0.000096060234,0.00016336315,0.00048413282,0.00022323933,0.00009254073,0.0002919625,0.00002888509,0.000027350945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029825323,0.00006536768,0.000047921618,0.001471405,0.0016701017,0.00041868168,0.00007152446,0.00014465331,0.0000034093252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006120521,0.0009749087,0.9257742,0.000037016238,0.000088308814,0.0000806553,0.0050412496,0.000009575811,0.0023534913,0.06496156,0.00029389965,0.00032391984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020622145,0.0002491381,0.76767343,0.00012427547,0.000040201074,0.000017177166,0.12943013,0.000977206,0.00052648864,0.09870888,0.000046136836,0.0001446866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003076278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012858448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15810075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013706778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008471968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6153559},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2110560640","doi":"10.1177/0963662510362834","title":"Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Demographics; Agriculture; Genetically modified maize; Biotechnology; Biology; Genetically modified crops; Sociology; Demography; Transgene","score_opus":0.3381699158898848,"score_gpt":0.42899045343867487,"score_spread":0.09082053754879005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110560640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769667,0.000084251486,0.021182507,0.0004988868,0.00009545355,0.00011515745,0.0000031694374,0.0000032295754,0.001050642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997367,0.000045266694,0.0025138773,0.000012484901,0.000025192496,0.000004209816,7.65899e-7,0.0000055926,0.000025607125],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988178,0.000029665578,0.0001837959,0.00023082396,0.0004255267,0.0003124114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930364,0.000058923357,0.000036615613,0.00034560365,0.00018542852,0.00006981472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018981198,0.00006233629,0.00008623627,0.00020212126,0.00012043534,0.00006917439,0.00052246446,0.000058049474,0.000008373968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009306839,0.000047141166,0.00002889039,0.0006767426,0.00221703,0.0000110594465,0.00023547189,0.00015745554,2.660121e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008465888,0.000026463324,0.004686641,0.000011769479,0.0000038553176,2.5977178e-7,0.00012909826,0.0003961144,0.97453696,0.019649398,0.000043545726,0.0005074234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004085139,0.0002868589,0.09992103,0.000029810557,0.0000044175795,0.000009681946,0.00082345976,0.00529609,0.88874656,0.0023756914,0.001900221,0.00019766937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005951495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001780307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09523439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000247506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028663286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168739},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2112267120","doi":"10.1177/0963662512445011","title":"Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Prerogative; Synthetic biology; Opposition (politics); Value (mathematics); Perception; Epistemology; Contextualization; Sociology; Biology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Genetics; Computer science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.6569746554918238,"score_gpt":0.4649709770504388,"score_spread":0.19200367844138494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112267120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91955686,0.00091695064,0.002490214,0.009997401,0.0006401372,0.00028828712,0.000011239081,0.00007442128,0.066024475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674094,0.0024667804,0.00064244174,0.000047265803,0.00004424732,0.000002679115,0.0000017952815,0.0000036827994,0.000050175477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989336,0.00009517358,0.0001864527,0.00014607818,0.0002817631,0.0003569165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.0002664714,0.0001591325,0.00018909405,0.00009832044,0.00014798905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002380699,0.00006292946,0.00012710212,0.00025892336,0.00089953234,0.000059787653,0.00040550658,0.0000653124,0.00011332261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074646494,0.000050932482,0.000023533432,0.00087706157,0.0047326833,0.00056863535,0.00014196608,0.00008301271,0.0000020700843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021914839,0.000114046634,0.046718907,0.00006734605,0.000008763087,1.1788601e-7,0.1552708,5.369586e-7,0.015223124,0.7743327,0.00012566664,0.008116088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015776872,0.00045070116,0.04140581,0.0004542453,0.000075976146,0.000041265528,0.8902787,0.0012144493,0.0015937954,0.038475893,0.023354756,0.0010766992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031622924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002441688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7358568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002358094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016975013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979759},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2118284749","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104721","title":"Ethnocultural community leaders’ views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Biobank; Public relations; Qualitative research; Population; Political science; Parliament; General partnership; Empirical research; Sociology; Social science; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.9682858363290403,"score_gpt":0.7231313609780634,"score_spread":0.2451544753509769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118284749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742653,0.00011295602,0.00012182195,0.019442186,0.00003705557,0.0008881202,0.000004300238,0.000023441995,0.0051048584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985882,0.00030569435,0.00069552124,0.00009720995,0.000038189482,0.000009187214,0.0000037077746,0.000008128205,0.00025414245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920717,0.0027920327,0.00046682506,0.00056729326,0.0033751922,0.0007269865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604786,0.011425505,0.000082681756,0.0006645404,0.0013287775,0.00045062994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08564277,0.00011855221,0.00029347275,0.0014483368,0.003165716,0.000322425,0.0005077581,0.00014883491,0.00002953804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02069972,0.00009354447,0.00003469746,0.0027940448,0.014538788,0.0004528936,0.0003654735,0.004226864,0.000007885816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031499323,0.0016135055,0.02939762,0.00014526598,0.000024731824,0.0000073407373,0.5209102,6.517829e-7,0.040383257,0.40310466,0.0004057269,0.0036920654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005961065,0.0026399943,0.32028797,0.00015275246,0.0000034624877,0.000004751863,0.55080444,0.000046372297,0.000039896793,0.125334,0.000019927005,0.000070303984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005582356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065530883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29089037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011996637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043766538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813205},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2119874225","doi":"10.1177/0963662511420511","title":"Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Structural equation modeling; Public trust; Set (abstract data type); Science communication; Psychology; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Science education; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.7019911411933458,"score_gpt":0.46281155206154523,"score_spread":0.2391795891318006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119874225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573385,0.00010046161,0.00022578561,0.006460123,0.000070994414,0.00019913333,0.0000014095347,0.000019028044,0.035584528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916524,0.00027531627,0.0004651798,0.000023402537,0.0000051147726,0.0000053309222,8.6623274e-8,0.0000018202171,0.000058494283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990988,0.000048919464,0.0001493307,0.00017252048,0.00031599595,0.00021442653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991776,0.00023631069,0.000075027914,0.00019689601,0.00022586166,0.00008835459],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042722435,0.000043559456,0.00008026498,0.0007972172,0.0010992627,0.00007301679,0.00059909147,0.000036771664,0.00004285995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028889955,0.000031850934,0.000005236334,0.004536339,0.013449039,0.00052617874,0.00026012457,0.00007904176,0.0000011140421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004806999,0.00002969803,0.3352078,0.000008696731,5.0775e-7,7.4028385e-8,0.079155095,5.6433226e-8,0.001048552,0.5826738,0.000010039707,0.0018609135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021637804,0.00010984951,0.79701,0.000098680575,0.000004059324,0.0000035720764,0.17255709,0.00012684078,0.00021954931,0.028757546,0.0007755435,0.00012086577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041624732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009441793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5539162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000278119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059564394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98923576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127448545","doi":"10.1177/0963662509102690","title":"The gap between scientists and journalists: the case of mercury science in Québec’s press","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Media studies; Journalism; Science communication; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.6052165534473128,"score_gpt":0.4691542361943893,"score_spread":0.13606231725292356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127448545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153531,0.0006343969,0.00034609623,0.049745478,0.00021760675,0.00025863844,0.0000069733355,0.000017490542,0.033420216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984014,0.0014193984,0.000053795306,0.000050975734,0.000022296928,0.0000015357956,2.0659255e-7,0.0000016098644,0.00004875291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983317,0.00015325019,0.00026407183,0.0001905622,0.00069541245,0.000364976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858,0.0004958221,0.00021777781,0.0003258635,0.00024477838,0.00013575406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01152,0.000059136528,0.00009867932,0.0002786806,0.0044758245,0.00061580195,0.0013036769,0.000025017567,0.000017922252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001402139,0.000037797807,0.000022860166,0.0024124852,0.019294465,0.0010346203,0.00016674222,0.00013176986,3.3035312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086846985,0.000060457547,0.013587222,0.000011146098,0.0000026463276,0.0000036966096,0.11473082,0.000003970139,0.0026014654,0.8336586,0.00019601951,0.03513526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009100214,0.00022158088,0.14061566,0.00029011516,0.00003301907,0.00014169935,0.7288572,0.0023336865,0.0007293672,0.10328968,0.022044083,0.000533888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011703378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04534435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7303689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059105066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009044728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968202},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2129601625","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306","title":"Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: a comparative study of four Anglo-American nations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sociology of scientific knowledge; General Social Survey; Public opinion; Political science; Variation (astronomy); Scientific evidence; Social science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1476767092510554,"score_gpt":0.347158489290871,"score_spread":0.19948178003981562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129601625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851303,0.000021089061,0.000091352966,0.0001640935,0.000068223875,0.00035812243,0.0000024586438,0.000010856698,0.014153518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951595,0.000008005601,0.00030927756,0.000008334076,0.0000028152995,0.000013654114,3.3592073e-7,0.0000028640895,0.00013873896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976959,0.00007567117,0.00030648225,0.00061391434,0.0009186908,0.00038934697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992622,0.000109086264,0.0001257601,0.00027231203,0.00004059472,0.00019004232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020423857,0.00011762911,0.00021856472,0.00058856624,0.00089433236,0.00017667944,0.00065094465,0.00001536457,0.000525626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015854696,0.000102776234,0.000020248503,0.0055477573,0.025103811,0.0010831577,0.0002710477,0.00009311804,0.0000061407222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005158689,0.0009690726,0.9447901,0.000010657167,0.0000025153463,2.5187865e-7,0.04977401,0.000055876404,0.001417357,0.0021870763,0.000010249255,0.00077764055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022644809,0.0001409779,0.89232016,0.0000067208052,0.0000032745709,0.0000013630276,0.10503155,0.00090112933,0.00015876233,0.0010824999,0.000025461944,0.00010166578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036744203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007578136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05525754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010933977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003128346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775493},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2129744414","doi":"10.1177/0963662506053738","title":"Moral presentation of genetics-based narratives for public understanding of genetic science and its implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Harm; Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Genetic testing; Medical genetics; Psychology; Obligation; Bioethics; Political science; Genetics; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Biology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1399270792147459,"score_gpt":0.3462521193223407,"score_spread":0.20632504010759478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129744414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7393958,0.0006418781,0.2552153,0.0031920876,0.00010242719,0.0004916516,0.00005471498,0.000008592185,0.0008975592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820257,0.00005395139,0.017778678,0.000043993034,0.000033933935,0.000031967782,0.000007942745,0.0000109736575,0.000012902913],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829054,0.000025283598,0.00037209273,0.0004537442,0.0005143516,0.00034398376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824595,0.000056935784,0.00034463737,0.00031370905,0.0009096383,0.0001291498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010552197,0.00011522177,0.00014819042,0.0005403659,0.0004815459,0.000084344916,0.0005521166,0.000055566245,0.000006679363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053433387,0.000119278746,0.000042921107,0.0013895949,0.004437482,0.0000892393,0.00013328792,0.000040257393,1.052703e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016237474,0.00006377297,0.0065067834,0.000063105086,0.000016399885,1.9269017e-8,0.00072311703,0.00087767834,0.9088928,0.08224572,0.00008625776,0.0005081094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011467305,0.00048706683,0.01014786,0.000038840513,0.00002707024,0.000006410194,0.008816889,0.019286638,0.9421146,0.017266722,0.00036789046,0.00029326134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029457083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002831403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24262986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051977707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023723927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130426866","doi":"10.1177/0963662510393083","title":"Frames, claims and audiences: Construction of food allergies in the Canadian media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Framing (construction); Allergy; Environmental health; Mass media; Public health; Food safety; Perception; Food allergy; Medicine; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography; Immunology","score_opus":0.15202335343811485,"score_gpt":0.21807949395867754,"score_spread":0.06605614052056269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130426866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98670393,0.000078868645,0.000022878452,0.0027947817,0.000098827564,0.000076966004,0.000011188122,0.0000066744274,0.010205874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995422,0.000048380312,0.00034096482,0.00005446682,0.000009924466,0.0000017430419,0.0000010091492,2.1120218e-7,0.000001122687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909896,0.000033443695,0.0001584704,0.00016299466,0.00029731743,0.00024883208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995967,0.00012883758,0.000084431376,0.000046284185,0.00005434444,0.00008937679],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010720757,0.000056704514,0.00009359155,0.000079967984,0.00039754028,0.000050120452,0.00042926715,0.000036467936,0.000056658493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012426241,0.000020879022,0.000018268405,0.0011096122,0.0033233266,0.0003564898,0.00004100087,0.00007299559,3.0004463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605223,0.000034782035,0.022171842,0.000008129515,0.000005094037,0.0000010227286,0.011560522,8.0587955e-7,0.0034627297,0.95654786,0.00003075219,0.006166856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019874853,0.00078389596,0.6409263,0.00005470859,0.0000063756643,0.000022266928,0.1405935,0.000105173574,0.0022643867,0.21418582,0.00065048836,0.00020832854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017020162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44903442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.742362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006743604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011018897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133789319","doi":"10.1177/0963662512472160","title":"From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Publics; Deliberation; Corporate governance; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Political science; Public awareness of science; Public participation; Sociology; Science communication; Business; Science education; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.5857273778470713,"score_gpt":0.4660049300630402,"score_spread":0.11972244778403107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133789319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8356393,0.000034121982,0.005827149,0.035820846,0.00032069982,0.00020847398,0.000018756573,0.00007155728,0.12205908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765724,0.00030072915,0.00093926385,0.00083666266,0.00014876318,0.00000849699,0.0000014204566,0.0000052847795,0.000102151134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977015,0.0001118973,0.0002093075,0.0003783395,0.001056051,0.0005429047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983784,0.0002125734,0.00014798141,0.00037519145,0.00036356674,0.0005222803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043587014,0.00009173347,0.00013536759,0.00040545195,0.0026139035,0.0007736894,0.0010273925,0.000044047778,0.00015397515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038389224,0.00009087645,0.000021319796,0.0033500108,0.009885617,0.0018444036,0.0003734712,0.000098300225,0.000012006038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040206883,0.000030572475,0.010448895,0.000003590718,0.0000017582571,5.1220614e-8,0.07509003,0.0000035137105,0.0041391184,0.9021628,0.00018099428,0.007934679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012311764,0.0003289133,0.26864254,0.00023460732,0.000026235497,0.0000022030763,0.3525566,0.0111367535,0.0019792302,0.186973,0.17564376,0.0012450034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003711909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026055216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71518975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012360736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986846},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2133826347","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302","title":"Scientific literacy as collective praxis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Praxis; Situated; Literacy; Ethnography; Sociology; Collective intelligence; Event (particle physics); Information literacy; Epistemology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.21158686980101016,"score_gpt":0.4075914366067257,"score_spread":0.19600456680571554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133826347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3558727,0.00013027916,0.074295685,0.0017823052,0.0021216522,0.00017738869,0.000003578205,0.00013053522,0.5654859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689319,6.9823056e-7,0.0041512446,0.00010594821,0.00004070651,0.000007599306,8.177787e-7,0.000011153628,0.026749922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747425,0.00037678832,0.00027795613,0.0005995837,0.00067498774,0.0005964165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835676,0.00040405965,0.00023023464,0.00043634503,0.0004404478,0.00013216854],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007018163,0.00012724235,0.00017816204,0.0012405913,0.0017851826,0.00055679464,0.0006474876,0.000056505905,0.002662914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023443676,0.00011664346,0.00005040298,0.005997199,0.005292149,0.0007982264,0.00009821081,0.00034090542,0.00015740319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872452,0.0003177129,0.010694927,0.000013223211,0.00003609031,0.00000773378,0.127048,0.000004310476,0.007943942,0.833039,0.00830814,0.012568228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066261133,0.0036488979,0.11527563,0.00053051254,0.00009827672,0.0005247388,0.15860027,0.014136275,0.008836438,0.41794035,0.27052423,0.0032582749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039390106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011469541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6130592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006469669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002496059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951434},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2137512204","doi":"10.1177/0963662513512441","title":"<i>Nacherzeugung, Nachverstehen</i>: A phenomenological perspective on how public understanding of science changes by engaging with online media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Scientific literacy; Sociology; History and philosophy of science; History of science; Science communication; Science education; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.19069262310952687,"score_gpt":0.31608265246383516,"score_spread":0.1253900293543083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137512204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.667677,0.00073958567,0.020502081,0.08037842,0.0016148735,0.0011852569,0.00011377929,0.00031580677,0.2274732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874973,0.000025705016,0.0005552413,0.00040338363,0.00009266633,0.00003094243,0.000008782508,0.000028373905,0.00010515433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951693,0.00017837058,0.00038458538,0.0012803556,0.0014737657,0.0015136161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971128,0.00048185806,0.0005803811,0.0007450806,0.0005598529,0.00052000384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022106867,0.00039326533,0.00057665224,0.0019165761,0.0015892388,0.00035238752,0.0019304397,0.00017355631,0.00039776613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007117151,0.0003168353,0.00007992218,0.0046401336,0.0294439,0.0018047161,0.00038142546,0.0006521331,0.000016860135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007526914,0.0005834303,0.0012968373,0.000019838459,0.00010330554,0.0000047400636,0.018496562,0.0000028738905,0.014439186,0.9644068,0.00035717612,0.00021400051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002591405,0.0024467267,0.0018483887,0.00013311216,0.00006745449,0.000045370678,0.7382405,0.00032227946,0.001256281,0.2519662,0.00022731323,0.0008549506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013855043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058700396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71974397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026368694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005668184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2146122845","doi":"10.1177/0963662513481294","title":"A surfeit of science: The “CSI effect” and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Appropriation; Hegemony; Contradiction; Sociology; Science communication; Social media; Reality tv; Public opinion; Mass media; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Science education; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.3991288809330105,"score_gpt":0.38424801767111966,"score_spread":0.014880863261890864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146122845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93898946,0.00015950634,0.0023963256,0.026448516,0.00073578855,0.0011273993,0.0000075778103,0.00002609673,0.030109325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999352,0.00042581864,0.00010028585,0.000053328935,0.000024547953,0.000014873877,5.937728e-7,0.000005271602,0.00002327746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954892,0.0004290661,0.0004987186,0.00033933917,0.0027005938,0.00054309884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956646,0.0016583373,0.0008153766,0.00077583635,0.0009231204,0.00016272556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0239903,0.00012484784,0.00026468246,0.00065010315,0.0045725717,0.0005238461,0.0032453972,0.000060261595,0.00010094099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006951823,0.0000663333,0.00008327085,0.008414348,0.12550484,0.0022340443,0.0007278569,0.0001902111,0.0000011115603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009727,0.00003758649,0.0074819303,0.000038160022,0.0000052676355,1.1031e-8,0.087643035,0.000003528871,0.022739708,0.8808422,0.000030244844,0.0011682232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016731649,0.00015269626,0.04874065,0.0002893162,0.00005467795,0.000004634427,0.79334784,0.009016342,0.0061800857,0.13994035,0.00026778274,0.00033246566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012394805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008784833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083842315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016260381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147817416","doi":"10.1177/0963662507077509","title":"The emergence of a community mapping network: coastal eelgrass mapping in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Victoria University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Outreach; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Citizen science; Wonder; Process (computing); Politics; Ethnography; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09202029578232994,"score_gpt":0.23054178283587534,"score_spread":0.1385214870535454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147817416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839725,0.00007276039,0.0023057996,0.00030026693,0.00024590158,0.00018034595,0.0000041225844,0.000019434443,0.012898903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992494,0.00018503556,0.00022870225,0.00002074622,0.000011958212,0.000008862458,5.8929913e-7,0.0000044793287,0.00029024263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981454,0.0001006582,0.0004199252,0.00019125633,0.0005918823,0.0005508592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991709,0.0002071798,0.00023084892,0.00026478752,0.000041266518,0.000085008345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612622,0.00007726757,0.00020480894,0.000053054802,0.0025739612,0.000110973524,0.00082387624,0.000025319132,0.00009835305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003403685,0.000089134715,0.000047023295,0.0022924435,0.0046199528,0.00053812895,0.0012494931,0.00020091736,0.0000023377281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011554711,0.000048231035,0.99140656,0.000016818669,0.000005162802,0.0000026775974,0.001975464,0.000055061955,0.0007003085,0.00038262006,0.0033777603,0.0020281638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001655547,0.000034462424,0.97110015,0.00006798166,0.0000013921074,0.000027594304,0.022788774,0.0008609494,0.000011933056,0.0040589026,0.0007635015,0.00011877529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07491508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37752795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30261287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022938367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007620692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147876970","doi":"10.1177/0963662506063017","title":"Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: the case of foot and mouth science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of East Anglia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Public awareness of science; Sociology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Politics; Criticism; Science communication; Relation (database); Philosophy of science; Social science; Political science; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.1653316454734304,"score_gpt":0.2743574182359106,"score_spread":0.10902577276248018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147876970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977532,0.00004906092,0.0001607695,0.0010031908,0.000019321935,0.0001521233,0.000026401465,0.0000035740968,0.00083232654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997457,0.000009513714,0.00017432187,0.000035068264,0.0000050117255,0.000002068185,0.0000010796296,3.112541e-7,0.000026903168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899757,0.000038486567,0.00027753974,0.00020357396,0.0002795269,0.00020329868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936825,0.00014845667,0.0002607339,0.00007499118,0.00011230872,0.00003524451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010929129,0.000064375614,0.00013408704,0.00005735645,0.00030208996,0.00004663063,0.00045341288,0.000022736029,0.000009032199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002861899,0.000020936519,0.000039702805,0.0017524646,0.004048903,0.0004839684,0.00022443384,0.00004494512,4.900684e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766062,0.00014889246,0.18645102,0.000048145357,0.000006377181,0.0000019849167,0.0015929273,0.0014057795,0.29239762,0.51687294,0.0001655315,0.00087113795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036972578,0.00022802116,0.81389046,0.000109639586,0.000038066846,0.00001803878,0.03419055,0.083167806,0.0047047106,0.06303885,0.000027445136,0.00021669526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001179333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007626512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62743944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052249834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000481631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986615},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2153995192","doi":"10.1177/0963662506052889","title":"The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: competing voices, contrasting frames","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Exploratory analysis; Political science; Democracy; Cluster (spacecraft); Descriptive statistics; Pragmatism; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Data science","score_opus":0.06979643153437269,"score_gpt":0.26027385716915075,"score_spread":0.19047742563477804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153995192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92411053,0.0003729305,0.000634548,0.07427018,0.000073383795,0.00038781043,0.00001981168,0.000036688885,0.000094104966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988413,0.0005432003,0.0004726232,0.000094227,0.000020394991,0.000018551977,0.000006562581,9.915681e-7,0.0000021913809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814487,0.00007586754,0.00027886475,0.0002678206,0.00051037525,0.000722179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967333,0.002804121,0.0001307053,0.00008313629,0.0001719791,0.00007677838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032476922,0.00009558356,0.00013558204,0.000066432694,0.0015066292,0.0005026261,0.00087372214,0.000035639754,0.0000044056155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001982295,0.000031192863,0.000019053492,0.0014977936,0.002822415,0.00021851389,0.00032374024,0.00015964065,2.0900671e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022274989,0.00012734749,0.13210824,0.00010069375,0.00005147386,0.0000021417475,0.0023702944,0.00074729294,0.1081317,0.5521699,0.0002605003,0.20370765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034119445,0.0004612659,0.086852446,0.00020230451,0.000014404964,0.00003731596,0.45430598,0.3688209,0.015962837,0.04680459,0.022172641,0.0009533802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073058575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5430704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5053653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042425236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027165806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156568070","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306","title":"Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ignorance; Functional illiteracy; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Climate change; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Public awareness of science; Scientific literacy; Social science; Science communication; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Science education; Ecology","score_opus":0.5924144285400437,"score_gpt":0.4405157376015892,"score_spread":0.15189869093845448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156568070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2234253,0.0058094785,0.0002848542,0.10626828,0.0010420223,0.0011196336,0.000021402757,0.00015877273,0.66187024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97003937,0.02931867,0.00003537971,0.00020619626,0.0000978224,0.000020856489,0.00000177447,0.000003930469,0.0002760279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986879,0.00021553664,0.00014463463,0.00018125353,0.00042565505,0.00034498965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992504,0.0001581668,0.00008672947,0.0003173847,0.00009624692,0.00009105929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035163495,0.00007520037,0.00010424894,0.0000729637,0.0036395094,0.0003493468,0.0008230351,0.00003997919,0.00026780405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023274934,0.000044612796,0.000037793765,0.0012633107,0.00893705,0.00068741065,0.00012001917,0.00011856052,0.000019378755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007818073,0.000048121776,0.00096772367,0.000014800083,0.0000053769004,1.2236747e-7,0.23811363,0.0000010109474,0.000051195337,0.73507893,0.00025220818,0.025388697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036642994,0.00014414573,0.0051790606,0.00016384605,0.00005910977,0.0000038482863,0.51907593,0.003021037,0.00002079267,0.03160298,0.43653426,0.00053068955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036576926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020952495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74661404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006914712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157148197","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104722","title":"Proceeding carefully: Assisted human reproduction policy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Leverhulme Trust; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Reproduction; Jurisdiction; Elite; Political science; Federalist; Policy development; Human reproduction; State (computer science); Public administration; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.08371168763202602,"score_gpt":0.2941998160954693,"score_spread":0.21048812846344328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157148197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.625636,0.00010283054,0.00015828354,0.03286181,0.0006871148,0.00026360957,0.0000052119876,0.000054278127,0.34023085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990353,0.000009654005,0.000033954762,0.00007970679,0.00010810264,0.0000011914262,5.687043e-7,0.0000022583317,0.0007292428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998364,0.000024064659,0.00018434036,0.00027837805,0.00073118217,0.0004180892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994361,0.000014710096,0.00011211342,0.00013066923,0.00011141124,0.00019499636],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013718212,0.0000500405,0.000102114136,0.0015572868,0.0019291593,0.0003638932,0.0003863165,0.000023715824,0.00003858096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006398882,0.0000674743,0.000018528055,0.003565353,0.0018225713,0.0006915229,0.000018977986,0.00009711951,5.3452277e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000167126,0.000025559273,0.011085332,0.000009204914,0.0000018538409,0.0000030771114,0.01188713,0.0000070924125,0.0025584607,0.96828455,0.0012860672,0.0048500076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009069415,0.00013955108,0.37164402,0.00021792075,0.000016945934,0.00001239085,0.34309384,0.000094843606,0.0004875102,0.12786256,0.15453671,0.0009867672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99962336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.840422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022814961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02094168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158238213","doi":"10.1177/0963662510361655","title":"Can the governance of a population genetic data bank effect recruitment? Evidence from the public consultation of Generation Scotland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Corporate governance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Good governance; Public economics; Business; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Demography; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.3178384925395448,"score_gpt":0.39872020931873864,"score_spread":0.08088171677919381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158238213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601046,0.00034429855,0.0030170078,0.034409575,0.0008586985,0.00072504376,0.000072779796,0.000012316773,0.00045568973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885285,0.00029532856,0.0005619693,0.00013659119,0.00010570264,0.000011605898,0.000014910267,0.0000038623584,0.0000171784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771357,0.00028453677,0.0003697365,0.00027165873,0.0010521988,0.0003083017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615294,0.002437052,0.0005236632,0.00056443474,0.00022625984,0.000095639254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005499185,0.00007734141,0.00015649485,0.000059826525,0.0010943543,0.0002626082,0.0013025366,0.00005099575,0.0000441405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010390785,0.0000480582,0.000027960607,0.0010523647,0.0025922682,0.0013145013,0.00014437964,0.00012291885,4.1447583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014533991,0.000033598542,0.6620527,0.000077457196,0.000016861371,2.133086e-7,0.012301314,0.000024368888,0.0067109293,0.30849567,0.0005690551,0.00970331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473821,0.00008587639,0.96918,0.0002503238,0.000042629898,0.0000011287605,0.01375808,0.007843859,0.00089890347,0.005531826,0.0017543647,0.00017919058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027372377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088164225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30712733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020814365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013331954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163499486","doi":"10.1177/0963662514528439","title":"Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Informed consent; Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Psychology; Principal (computer security); Research ethics; Medical education; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Pathology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7901716714040768,"score_gpt":0.6243422349910017,"score_spread":0.16582943641307513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163499486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990352,0.0001558192,0.001364556,0.0031387568,0.000019751065,0.00036038816,0.000002268652,0.0000089333225,0.0045975526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975948,0.0009329526,0.0012068681,0.00004396476,0.000021697515,0.000006068988,0.0000043006194,0.000010852589,0.0001784979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949084,0.0003864628,0.0006218125,0.0003389645,0.0029347036,0.0008096752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98734975,0.010420092,0.00016775238,0.0008035074,0.00073158863,0.0005272918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023308747,0.00008577251,0.00026871436,0.0008358736,0.00027405954,0.000107484964,0.0007644226,0.00015229595,0.000027789045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048699323,0.00007875739,0.000031329568,0.0015123938,0.009095494,0.00017290143,0.00091989024,0.0009613473,0.000003289823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020557194,0.00031927237,0.89797014,0.0010079686,0.00005605547,0.0000055741884,0.0126317665,0.000062182015,0.054058667,0.026584497,0.00009441487,0.0070038955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0083417315,0.0041046757,0.48897177,0.002001883,0.00007631387,0.000014165686,0.117197074,0.025039416,0.08954041,0.263331,0.0008154514,0.0005661277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006415379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058243517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40899837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046861707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002789225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167322003","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414983","title":"Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Narrative; Skepticism; Newspaper; Normative; Climate change; Media studies; Subject (documents); Political science; Neutrality; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Art; Computer science; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.413333968661421,"score_gpt":0.3835932143465601,"score_spread":0.02974075431486095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167322003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77550894,0.000717839,0.0027786912,0.11556754,0.005846458,0.0016492528,0.000020651769,0.00007711718,0.097833514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977408,0.0011574894,0.0002239851,0.00037265298,0.0004598066,0.00003633937,5.3798e-7,0.0000055213236,0.0000028910285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982399,0.00019537688,0.00023831392,0.00017761784,0.0007079783,0.00044084634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988161,0.00041216466,0.00020736965,0.00037841065,0.000106252024,0.000079700265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006160495,0.00008333586,0.0001220969,0.00020334043,0.0017764907,0.00014286028,0.0014890119,0.000031319298,0.00008152178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049654226,0.00004673107,0.000040905426,0.0016868208,0.0030408679,0.0006391449,0.00026215275,0.00016102195,0.0000027612848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013304468,0.000015131565,0.015320784,0.0000042083702,0.0000022092252,6.851051e-8,0.93102777,0.0000026640844,0.0013175458,0.047929075,0.00010663697,0.004260611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008963171,0.000022399368,0.015336948,0.00016127012,0.000003392818,2.2719045e-7,0.9674862,0.00009736006,0.00013036982,0.0027355338,0.013847344,0.00008934103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080003653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020438107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22223184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036335186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001169511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317982304","doi":"10.1177/0963662514545014","title":"Assessing the quality of a deliberative democracy mini-public event about advanced biofuel production and development in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Democracy; Public participation; Research council; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.10341732006616995,"score_gpt":0.35802912950323085,"score_spread":0.2546118094370609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317982304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807169,0.0000915668,0.0074786656,0.0077570193,0.00040348154,0.00019260189,7.005757e-7,0.000013608008,0.0033454765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973049,0.00003747005,0.0025085846,0.00006218326,0.000034381686,0.000010165696,5.1719974e-7,0.0000048204424,0.000036951336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.00031590482,0.00045439941,0.00034173104,0.0011703974,0.00047153773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984507,0.00042406752,0.00046056655,0.0001627465,0.00036632956,0.00013559505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058379825,0.0001018558,0.00021847375,0.00020318621,0.0014829376,0.00021730742,0.000494392,0.00003500997,0.000011774738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052805245,0.00008376856,0.000018917885,0.0018458543,0.0027011186,0.0017133938,0.00010096099,0.000094358664,8.946856e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014119966,0.00013312412,0.3749603,0.00009002659,0.000027287735,4.8638424e-7,0.052375603,0.00040719792,0.0061343783,0.37605366,0.00007531855,0.1897285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005068124,0.000031297845,0.29302046,0.00018980245,0.00000540446,8.9181884e-7,0.663045,0.0004081943,0.0053984206,0.035205938,0.0017742952,0.00041350359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33394128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95783144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62389016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026740567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008960533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999817},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2322230534","doi":"10.1177/0963662512450990","title":"Front page or “buried” beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Newspaper; Media coverage; Opposition (politics); Greenhouse gas; Content analysis; Political science; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Public opinion; Public relations; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Media studies; Climate change; Sociology; Social science; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.4860786367515358,"score_gpt":0.3951380317364512,"score_spread":0.09094060501508461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322230534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8715891,0.00082269387,0.001220813,0.0075058825,0.0005986271,0.0002926021,0.000023470511,0.00003900321,0.11790778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980189,0.0015847159,0.000080959006,0.000079393,0.00007450921,0.0000034950021,0.0000021631522,0.0000040866375,0.00015177453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869555,0.000120532095,0.00015933249,0.00012296661,0.0005909637,0.00031065833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998984,0.00035465343,0.00015603521,0.0002579673,0.0000905167,0.00015687649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002892865,0.00006848778,0.00011870858,0.00013371998,0.000783278,0.000096078154,0.0004898656,0.000053009455,0.00029206747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005987889,0.000045843855,0.000024729776,0.00058733043,0.0031636553,0.0005853888,0.00013476513,0.00009462819,8.8572614e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028482891,0.00013615639,0.04213621,0.000044700144,0.000013193692,3.8946047e-7,0.68977547,0.0000029816244,0.004199729,0.25967315,0.00037821435,0.0036113476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081184664,0.000099376826,0.06890455,0.00013198519,0.000053734766,0.0000055036007,0.89557296,0.0009370339,0.00029435163,0.009626902,0.023096915,0.00046485598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010903645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002855774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25004625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030066294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021009125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400513735","doi":"10.1177/0963662515611823","title":"“It’s natural to look for a source”: A qualitative examination of alternative beliefs about HIV and AIDS in Cape Town, South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Skepticism; Credibility; Cape; Focus group; Experiential learning; Sociology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Power (physics); Natural (archaeology); Trustworthiness; Scientific evidence; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; History; Law; Pedagogy; Family medicine","score_opus":0.37600767917625355,"score_gpt":0.46345095382063156,"score_spread":0.08744327464437801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400513735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8619003,0.0002091322,0.122208126,0.007883419,0.00071171863,0.0020548324,0.000053684103,0.000034094304,0.004944658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961658,0.0000039895554,0.0022872023,0.00020764954,0.00007045345,0.00004505148,0.0000030891629,0.000009456114,0.001207298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974879,0.00035164502,0.0005138713,0.00048375464,0.000612659,0.00055017235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789894,0.0005313203,0.0003966555,0.00017902613,0.0007180794,0.0002759591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070999125,0.00012529914,0.00029969998,0.00072351383,0.00047430018,0.000016622364,0.00026852818,0.000060722006,0.0000065466743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032355716,0.000099494835,0.000022141088,0.0012333941,0.0012605644,0.00048904313,0.00019343989,0.00025067397,0.0000021124679],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093974544,0.00010521775,0.0071463017,0.00021698154,0.0000073442375,2.1199075e-7,0.9555475,0.000018219698,0.0007011741,0.03539839,0.00036254642,0.00040212797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014384752,0.00048383532,0.008644651,0.0003784439,0.000005336537,5.891086e-7,0.97874165,0.0011660656,0.00016954196,0.008279435,0.0005305955,0.00016136873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008441787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006148034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13426547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008914832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009451047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46446022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743152103","doi":"10.1177/0963662517725715","title":"Anticipating health innovations in 2030–2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Publics; Public health; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Business; Politics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Nursing","score_opus":0.16375850065465422,"score_gpt":0.3729762413115637,"score_spread":0.20921774065690948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743152103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84498465,0.000038671915,0.07214805,0.07296608,0.00039248937,0.0014048286,0.000030152652,0.000038604656,0.007996503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966428,0.000049614104,0.0026209827,0.0005118339,0.000024108016,0.00004841679,0.0000012922615,0.000011926854,0.00008900658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695444,0.000112063375,0.0005393474,0.0007322839,0.00078673015,0.00087515556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973152,0.00076612056,0.00063810055,0.0010448616,0.000042991887,0.00019270006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013762486,0.00014616681,0.00021177973,0.00023334718,0.0041474947,0.00049816986,0.0011635635,0.000048894235,0.0001704949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004875423,0.0001032515,0.00004275287,0.0010514853,0.005498423,0.0022706804,0.00064116815,0.00025617197,0.000007709764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003050741,0.0002420557,0.88837767,0.000095951706,0.000010641106,0.0000015193198,0.006509099,0.00014482961,0.0045947223,0.060272824,0.0005056637,0.039214514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000684493,0.00010031244,0.9417771,0.00010870073,0.0000051470015,0.0000025776867,0.0102356905,0.012167875,0.00054083165,0.031667292,0.0024435646,0.00026641705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016967942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044671423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15165819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019114725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047413755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99720806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775691914","doi":"10.1177/0963662517746561","title":"The Mid-Victorian period and the Astronomical Register (1863-1886): ‘A medium of communication for amateurs and others’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"History and Developments in Astronomy","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Period (music); Telecommunications; History; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05206521858061487,"score_gpt":0.28022839925439047,"score_spread":0.2281631806737756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775691914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.796881,0.00026366772,0.14145643,0.020664748,0.001053563,0.0010839888,0.000035555247,0.000018160335,0.038542863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974761,0.000003656464,0.0022924468,0.0000056533545,0.000030199697,0.000016579317,0.0000010536166,0.000004375604,0.00016991455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929243,0.000031093157,0.00019083092,0.00015295415,0.00014613294,0.00018656428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888664,0.00021115814,0.00033358665,0.0004493449,0.000059429432,0.00005985204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015562503,0.00007342943,0.000129095,0.00004018385,0.002332219,0.00032220024,0.00070048077,0.000014847053,0.000008535735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075449076,0.00004566081,0.000030357063,0.000048319347,0.008562133,0.00040025587,0.0001989547,0.00006773373,2.0301292e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000640064,0.000020141702,0.07099755,0.000009041503,0.000035912108,8.143248e-9,0.006348277,0.0000019307608,0.00026885138,0.91909075,0.00014807255,0.0030154856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017693754,0.00034378233,0.21308865,0.00039888822,0.00018475745,0.0000050820504,0.16798568,0.0029842828,0.005558596,0.2627935,0.32777804,0.0011850025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029258219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012035182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6562972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059396545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019791552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796216221","doi":"10.1177/0963662518761733","title":"Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Open science; Social media; Science communication; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Citizen science; Ask price; World Wide Web; Altmetrics; Online community; Public engagement; Data science; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Science education; Publishing; Business","score_opus":0.50896915729909,"score_gpt":0.49662623253611704,"score_spread":0.01234292476297294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796216221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96721405,0.0000018435338,0.031666577,0.00014610196,0.000017818847,0.00043485084,0.000005407892,0.000013108581,0.0005002314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992802,7.697605e-7,0.0006444073,0.000006315426,0.00003245316,0.000012994395,0.0000010831084,0.000007875936,0.000013901553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978277,0.00016571718,0.00037132128,0.0003587165,0.00094658334,0.0003299293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984764,0.00019617479,0.00028400868,0.0004961622,0.00045727956,0.00009000579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002881206,0.000097280354,0.00023178803,0.00074365933,0.0005672697,0.0004536173,0.001341408,0.000009673142,0.00012861924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003649474,0.000074935975,0.0000300079,0.0024379669,0.0011704317,0.00085516536,0.0016804052,0.00013520113,3.5891742e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006484748,0.0030802498,0.94370943,0.00003387287,0.00008888314,0.000014531839,0.015173807,0.000026970743,0.011692062,0.02102828,0.00006047397,0.0050265607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026663686,0.004180921,0.08483757,0.00087415334,0.00010988908,0.000011658533,0.74957347,0.013003196,0.10700311,0.037282575,0.000019638108,0.00043747746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005020816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012619218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8588719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115033916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013726972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590005},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2796249541","doi":"10.1177/0963662518766281","title":"Farmers prevailing perception profiles regarding GM crops: A classification proposal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Perception; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified crops; Variety (cybernetics); Stakeholder; Diversity (politics); Genetically engineered; Biotechnology; Sociology; Biology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.14371476778850525,"score_gpt":0.30283445820276395,"score_spread":0.1591196904142587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796249541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849586,0.00000950965,0.0038310362,0.0038770807,0.00013788957,0.00033235512,0.000004814065,0.000076608616,0.006772111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971106,0.000009941614,0.0025776848,0.00002879876,0.00014734875,0.000009423188,0.000004813084,0.0000014735566,0.00010990478],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976583,0.000073975076,0.00025288874,0.0005095631,0.0009493025,0.0005559814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.00009323902,0.000121677236,0.00011146654,0.00043328718,0.00019250228],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017897872,0.00011187468,0.00012311644,0.00010790324,0.0011008228,0.0003631379,0.0006984759,0.00007012632,0.00037371318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055123237,0.00004980881,0.000044884706,0.0017865556,0.0037416574,0.00060800184,0.00018959442,0.00012439092,0.000033260127],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110857945,0.00003642581,0.0068049133,0.000008953175,0.0000028046115,1.8563688e-7,0.00043345246,4.6830664e-7,0.9670466,0.014203407,0.000050063314,0.0114016235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005433145,0.0019938054,0.6840537,0.00017444907,0.00002566295,0.000031195337,0.08989144,0.014979747,0.18183346,0.024403362,0.001202282,0.00086759054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006845893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000075437165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7852132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039613442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018134469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885131378","doi":"10.1177/0963662518793204","title":"Book Review: Susanna Priest, Communicating Climate Change: The Path Forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Climate change; Environmental ethics; Telecommunications; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer network; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.565314376449417,"score_gpt":0.4602810698541386,"score_spread":0.10503330659527838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885131378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019010733,0.0732236,0.0020509586,0.38952997,0.00082223985,0.0016899203,0.000025776693,0.00029122265,0.53046525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68302125,0.30364427,0.00026136904,0.012648863,0.00017191668,0.000040804687,0.0000055128576,0.000009244238,0.0001967802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794513,0.00029026004,0.00028888852,0.00020671594,0.00074506516,0.0005239661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980693,0.00027563714,0.00030169945,0.00081347936,0.00039780364,0.00014208282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007110655,0.000093204464,0.00015155754,0.00013692395,0.0049541504,0.00025270088,0.0019072389,0.000042779844,0.00090511946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009868196,0.00007115397,0.00005657184,0.0016415333,0.010337959,0.0012002711,0.00052467023,0.00015494178,0.000030337107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012822644,0.00012828644,0.0036333394,0.00029633704,0.00001189533,3.149728e-7,0.19349891,7.63735e-8,0.00041020298,0.66481084,0.09972109,0.037475877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012183437,0.000062057115,0.0008873386,0.0007266995,0.000013636819,0.000001711134,0.05315968,0.0002522215,0.000027062379,0.0020790286,0.94249874,0.00017000461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025549426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006477046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8427776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043034015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022226048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885761036","doi":"10.1177/0963662518791902","title":"Researching multiple publics through latent profile analysis: Similarities and differences in science and technology attitudes in China, Japan, South Korea and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Religiosity; Publics; Structural equation modeling; East Asia; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.44973142730612164,"score_gpt":0.4206395576674103,"score_spread":0.029091869638711354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885761036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98274565,0.0001351627,0.00017120353,0.015054111,0.000027636135,0.0002451722,0.0000066134107,0.000023603901,0.0015908452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972426,0.002415003,0.00024182997,0.000059694725,0.000008112372,0.000013593585,0.000003625122,0.000002582491,0.000012915998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816036,0.00018549587,0.00022202535,0.00033438785,0.00066198484,0.00043576362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988742,0.00039039,0.00011438425,0.00022049685,0.00031243727,0.00008809412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071433308,0.00008532686,0.00019154014,0.002014267,0.0021096123,0.0007748672,0.00065519527,0.000053219344,0.000020145213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026512353,0.00006176457,0.000010976324,0.0094215805,0.041492924,0.0011393263,0.00052361086,0.00019237114,1.6370524e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001127431,0.000022972035,0.72182345,0.000013632143,0.000005508043,9.9254436e-8,0.15614468,0.0000010875171,0.00011635899,0.121553145,0.0000021737264,0.0003056139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006638598,0.000059230035,0.5429751,0.000081333405,0.000011923271,8.612871e-7,0.40154138,0.025824664,0.00003199603,0.028618902,0.000049421575,0.00014129154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007811963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034172554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24539669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025967264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027655176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899501770","doi":"10.1177/0963662518809804","title":"Do newspapers preferentially cover biomedical studies involving national scientists?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Cover (algebra); Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7927431899398841,"score_gpt":0.51843480275747,"score_spread":0.2743083871824141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899501770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28090662,0.00040822686,0.006330991,0.02139699,0.0034653072,0.00043558047,0.000025077368,0.00021637027,0.68681484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975758,0.0009972668,0.0005770121,0.00018814008,0.00017538402,0.0000039979373,0.0000042497877,0.0000041017674,0.00047400105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734324,0.00010465493,0.00022417115,0.00027759717,0.0016777125,0.00037263735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832094,0.00020677742,0.00015193567,0.00019051477,0.0009401744,0.00018967505],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044300985,0.00007542737,0.00011410135,0.0005211717,0.002815588,0.00040104947,0.0008128229,0.00005091073,0.0015382138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025437193,0.00007004298,0.00003778578,0.0021595946,0.018263068,0.0010985531,0.0002718414,0.00007937251,0.00005684313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152768,0.000106738786,0.0023343803,0.000021235535,0.00001942236,1.4062375e-7,0.0963675,5.312024e-7,0.009970365,0.8796896,0.010070709,0.0014112554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011641701,0.00028888852,0.009960643,0.00037401597,0.00003016146,0.0000035506016,0.60582894,0.0010124757,0.00038505788,0.1382309,0.24201468,0.0007065098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102351594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089458545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74145865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012385978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010265714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969751061","doi":"10.1177/0963662519868969","title":"The critical reception of the <i>DSM-5</i>: Towards a typology of audiences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Typology; Naturalism; Association (psychology); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Common ground; Narrative; Humanism; Sociology; Narratology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.1251424667542597,"score_gpt":0.3140854409436589,"score_spread":0.18894297418939923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969751061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5925535,0.0002801824,0.00016871926,0.017090984,0.0051246537,0.0002500862,0.000017103104,0.000011304698,0.38450348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937165,0.000028069679,0.00003672747,0.00012074919,0.00004138125,0.0000016356126,1.7873137e-7,0.0000019829636,0.00039764386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989628,0.00004314516,0.00023964047,0.000118738346,0.0004002968,0.00023538835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992983,0.00019345297,0.00015627348,0.00018369945,0.00012093013,0.00004734005],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011748257,0.000047996225,0.00010187716,0.000070903436,0.00067301095,0.000046253583,0.00047606148,0.000018040411,0.0003661776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016699152,0.000025099824,0.000042122316,0.00020632347,0.0070620733,0.00023635726,0.00007213183,0.000070909235,0.0000034553775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102309905,0.000022047272,0.002291635,0.000060337705,0.0000020124755,8.383027e-9,0.0064846147,2.7343654e-7,0.0002976959,0.9901982,0.0002820872,0.00035089112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007702261,0.0014309948,0.011504629,0.00040231168,0.00002882158,0.000008678042,0.42531502,0.00056104024,0.0035082544,0.5148467,0.041307453,0.00031589795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001327593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000275484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47535148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054899992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031442777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99564016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008656998","doi":"10.1177/0963662520905466","title":"Assessing YouTube science news’ credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Popularity; Source credibility; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.22678584172344918,"score_gpt":0.3819570587012111,"score_spread":0.15517121697776193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008656998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95191956,0.000040373812,0.0020306744,0.015915716,0.000046995825,0.00023363392,0.000008080391,0.000020547963,0.029784435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995656,0.0000311044,0.000080356775,0.0002849317,0.000021434305,4.5956799e-7,1.9517995e-7,0.0000034089662,0.000012501834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967162,0.00013109409,0.00032172422,0.00023639936,0.002108863,0.00048570667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981134,0.00058554404,0.00028000318,0.00027856664,0.00043459615,0.0003079111],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008561436,0.00009467593,0.00017218613,0.00026908718,0.001812268,0.0008342395,0.0011628665,0.000031764008,0.000086023836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071362313,0.000051701987,0.00006477982,0.0039356337,0.013885305,0.0027774973,0.00024238846,0.00016485334,0.0000011338744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046266352,0.00011329764,0.09562688,0.000035830697,0.000023121283,1.6036093e-7,0.23117088,0.0004917265,0.06651304,0.5977648,0.0012658063,0.0069481907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041189327,0.000364133,0.04719254,0.00010379699,0.000012114966,0.0000015931072,0.89568174,0.03471245,0.013544789,0.0063568302,0.0014049172,0.00021321789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005525516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022119995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66451085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030516618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029728806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036239323","doi":"10.1177/0963662520923110","title":"What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Templeton Religion Trust","keywords":"Publics; Sociology; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Politics; Existentialism; Field (mathematics); Norm (philosophy); Social science education; Science education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6248035204532549,"score_gpt":0.4449237684640692,"score_spread":0.1798797519891857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036239323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72752047,0.0000987067,0.2080231,0.057194285,0.00062269584,0.0006176508,0.000007238815,0.0000641276,0.005851735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785495,0.00040008075,0.0012758968,0.00038662564,0.000052937285,0.000005678315,0.0000014805992,0.000007113973,0.000015229404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621296,0.00011608842,0.00035314416,0.0005514518,0.0021373485,0.000628996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787253,0.00020244968,0.00037051935,0.00036192793,0.00082682073,0.00036573215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064324527,0.00012346345,0.00017864227,0.00072166533,0.0059697847,0.000657449,0.0020720898,0.000049335955,0.00005661766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001081533,0.00009904975,0.000047100468,0.00788269,0.0479802,0.0040664705,0.0003716065,0.0001605277,0.000004051115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028289694,0.00004195376,0.0024015242,0.0000217374,0.0000052077326,1.897001e-7,0.32502767,0.00016205704,0.22420672,0.4477679,0.000062703104,0.0002740196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025042248,0.00014920489,0.003311185,0.00013543008,0.000020268404,0.000003637416,0.94814885,0.035936255,0.0018854119,0.00968267,0.00023368381,0.00024300693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029606774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000218922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62312114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033731775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048214453","doi":"10.1177/0963662520946667","title":"Effects of gender harassment on science popularization behaviors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Harassment; Legitimacy; Science communication; Clothing; Public relations; Public engagement; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Science education; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.2413896625906315,"score_gpt":0.4029488181134472,"score_spread":0.1615591555228157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048214453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94413143,0.000013370265,0.03293723,0.0039384677,0.0014956011,0.00029290598,0.000003993559,0.00004585918,0.017141156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998908,0.0000021730862,0.00056713907,0.00042519983,0.00003090396,0.000008940793,0.0000011044657,0.0000047916606,0.000051742536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979138,0.00003647474,0.00023530802,0.00045050125,0.0010065136,0.00035741137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990455,0.00007814953,0.00016885594,0.00023869678,0.00017973589,0.00028907444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010446914,0.00008591336,0.000117120675,0.000612195,0.000524669,0.00009889105,0.0007636888,0.000031895444,0.0004386102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004978778,0.000078683195,0.000036414378,0.004254665,0.0041541867,0.0005875563,0.0000714152,0.00009362163,0.000028996663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010044296,0.00032178714,0.030012308,0.000026232365,0.000004413358,7.027944e-7,0.028011318,0.00002637325,0.26157653,0.6787605,0.00050358963,0.00074616115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009809722,0.0007957837,0.896632,0.000057898735,0.000037784357,0.0000064227484,0.055638272,0.0013243022,0.0395105,0.00428208,0.00031002346,0.0004239176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026633888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014704622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86661977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031828947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005940462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081647417","doi":"10.1177/0963662520950671","title":"Exploring scholars’ public engagement goals in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kavli Foundation; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; Burroughs Wellcome Fund","keywords":"Public engagement; Demographics; Agency (philosophy); Sample (material); Public relations; Funding Agency; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.4329928537704818,"score_gpt":0.3110697779997487,"score_spread":0.12192307577073308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081647417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90980804,0.00006741901,0.0006672146,0.08237628,0.00013533578,0.00019783415,0.0000015425762,0.000037916016,0.006708394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794984,0.0004918467,0.00009490794,0.0014133945,0.000018257902,0.0000140352995,0.0000018012418,0.0000051723673,0.000010730873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972207,0.0008293032,0.00023573296,0.00022253541,0.0009905845,0.0005011591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984718,0.0008187317,0.00011936265,0.00018950457,0.000129358,0.00027121676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008356762,0.00008944363,0.00015042766,0.0002787736,0.0023417159,0.0005553986,0.001012134,0.000014734541,0.00004455879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002028341,0.00007235909,0.000018009814,0.003506814,0.0019481478,0.0011876487,0.00037578243,0.0004323856,8.9776955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021790696,0.000032287473,0.057867173,0.00003765586,0.000023117067,0.0000032789933,0.24280642,0.000539924,0.00005900171,0.6962759,0.0001503993,0.0021830695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007546854,0.000025430594,0.005824091,0.000037877766,0.0000057520942,2.2459584e-7,0.96485853,0.003711034,0.00004041482,0.0024447967,0.022146257,0.00015089102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8445402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7823097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7220521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012256658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020175723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989571},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3093329438","doi":"10.1177/0963662520963365","title":"Knowledge, (mis-)conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Disease; Middle East respiratory syndrome; Outbreak; Risk perception; Social distance; Perception; Hygiene; Environmental health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Psychology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Virology","score_opus":0.4714173073633237,"score_gpt":0.49172868567535855,"score_spread":0.020311378312034833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093329438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000721797,0.9943411,0.000108984794,0.00021002296,0.0002821877,0.0018700826,0.000032873293,0.000052491137,0.003030083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018080445,0.9977086,0.00017208335,0.000046342193,0.00012323796,0.00006533629,0.0000043312616,0.000012099259,0.000059884875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.996995,0.00029061447,0.0009907598,0.00039420484,0.0008700474,0.00045938147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735683,0.00027872573,0.0013209323,0.00024349488,0.0004538701,0.00034616503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004152096,0.0002530882,0.0012759885,0.0006200557,0.001438856,0.00015312653,0.0006269767,0.00012552123,0.00007338101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042284513,0.0002144268,0.00019123904,0.0026479114,0.0045460276,0.0017063859,0.00021567254,0.00026571442,0.0000059732465],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001203517,0.00006309891,0.00011571879,0.25150865,0.00006077644,8.928352e-7,0.11131508,2.0175246e-8,0.0000018375157,0.008040089,0.00029191302,0.6286007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028158998,0.000080480175,0.00012690779,0.74958587,0.0008594323,0.00001705333,0.14024591,0.0000063944,8.2581755e-7,0.00019582934,0.107963696,0.000636031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058094298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010526324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6279647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010155312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021083849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094400678","doi":"10.1177/0963662520965490","title":"Population health AI researchers’ perceptions of the public portrayal of AI: A pilot study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Sensationalism; Perception; Population health; Psychology; Population; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.4910734703954394,"score_gpt":0.4745531649617737,"score_spread":0.016520305433665727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094400678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6367598,0.000020121153,0.0012309807,0.35628703,0.00014977617,0.0005234803,0.000010376287,0.000026321903,0.004992101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988595,0.000022259344,0.0001024655,0.00093002606,0.00004412852,0.0000022300082,8.1623193e-7,0.000005780498,0.000032764423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961994,0.00045645412,0.00041785926,0.0002505737,0.0021865352,0.00048915343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980837,0.0001902766,0.00034826764,0.00022022198,0.0007601008,0.00039744086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008379367,0.00007627277,0.00023105308,0.00023533888,0.0019497249,0.00026228372,0.0009883825,0.00004219052,0.00007201375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052664727,0.00006187535,0.0000644234,0.0034797578,0.005226111,0.0014416955,0.0001769497,0.00035989936,5.995042e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009738481,0.00036119422,0.20710105,0.000030262217,0.0000129720565,1.5440459e-7,0.108336054,0.000006505297,0.0008416309,0.68273973,0.0003685504,0.00019215595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055323174,0.002151089,0.38216296,0.000063870684,0.000012840731,3.349832e-7,0.5450807,0.0002668693,0.00003718741,0.069243364,0.0002469194,0.00018061607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073274537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61349636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005745778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118396830","doi":"10.1177/0963662520982540","title":"Co-producing uncertainty in public science: The case of genomic selection in forestry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Forestry; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5320797320514963,"score_gpt":0.4481629911374109,"score_spread":0.08391674091408535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118396830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704504,0.000056548848,0.0002020689,0.006852902,0.00013016703,0.00015348494,0.0000028264203,0.000014643609,0.022136949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.0003805387,0.00011334068,0.000049278908,0.000022853093,0.0000059407926,0.0000016752241,0.0000032329308,0.000026919532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821305,0.00020582128,0.0003031967,0.00030945323,0.0005290753,0.00043941947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998887,0.00022704406,0.00017018063,0.0002777962,0.0003409452,0.00009703469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091667175,0.000063895626,0.00012201494,0.00061734504,0.0014653287,0.00029272036,0.0007302452,0.00004433502,0.00017203754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001987941,0.000056921177,0.000028303451,0.0064881435,0.006511875,0.0010879495,0.00012800371,0.00017675677,0.0000014034822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101414535,0.00021757018,0.13634881,0.00004366386,0.0000035826438,0.0000128439215,0.14540647,0.0004004681,0.09013297,0.6197287,0.00004030861,0.0076545156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006038818,0.00004594069,0.099832915,0.00010458931,0.00000532766,0.000089063986,0.85939103,0.010561261,0.0016002229,0.026658228,0.00083995226,0.00026759546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004070961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05726829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71398455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002020855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002725553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209737204","doi":"10.1177/09636625211051970","title":"Science communication skills as an asset across disciplines: A 10-year case study of students’ motivation patterns at Université Laval","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Science communication; Communication skills; Psychology; Science education; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4230862481454705,"score_gpt":0.47902038454205986,"score_spread":0.05593413639658934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209737204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943453,0.000009313215,0.00019093246,0.00091052277,0.000094963056,0.0002570371,0.000022682008,0.00003609877,0.0041331667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991588,0.00034427881,0.00010700965,0.000020351396,0.00001364951,0.0000020650784,0.000019036888,0.000005756631,0.0003290389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971036,0.00032164837,0.0003073865,0.0003734838,0.00153711,0.0003567941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974987,0.0002363606,0.00031795955,0.0007980102,0.00093723997,0.00021175301],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044747754,0.00009534167,0.00015778365,0.00037194556,0.0041422825,0.0004503652,0.0015863433,0.00004718382,0.00030046247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008772611,0.00009981377,0.000034936205,0.0036586642,0.0033831687,0.0020789725,0.0011942801,0.00010250895,0.0000033764236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012355108,0.0015172195,0.4869812,0.00001412183,0.000008651919,0.00001063402,0.4922025,0.00001396816,0.004548903,0.014108546,0.000014953238,0.0005669446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005149283,0.00014582997,0.070659,0.000039557865,0.000009461686,0.00001690833,0.9275038,0.00010879593,0.00039448266,0.0003787855,0.00011249128,0.000115934454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004431068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05115679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43530133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016605757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008147242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310572720","doi":"10.1177/09636625221135425","title":"Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: Practicable communication strategies of “reasoned transparency” to aid public reception of changing science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Science communication; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Heuristic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Science education; Medicine; Computer security; Virology; Artificial intelligence; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.6298813795993575,"score_gpt":0.4749396006509381,"score_spread":0.15494177894841943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310572720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92228925,0.00011775201,0.020202423,0.022325125,0.00029266533,0.0008041048,0.0000629554,0.00010263615,0.033803105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758554,0.00047257775,0.0016843644,0.0000834105,0.0000114511895,0.000050386516,0.000010125406,0.000007652345,0.00009446924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632865,0.00053596176,0.00049329596,0.0003587529,0.0017077723,0.0005755639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723554,0.00063091714,0.00045299152,0.00068198075,0.0007302015,0.00026837527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013400427,0.000107439715,0.00023274438,0.0019473392,0.0034297968,0.00027048838,0.0020371766,0.00003568332,0.00044157536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034372008,0.000119702854,0.00004874685,0.009352513,0.0043673995,0.0018465712,0.0005175111,0.0001743696,0.0000024239532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015473593,0.00027843812,0.0064255283,0.00005751105,0.000008832072,2.3532077e-7,0.2032938,0.0007796764,0.09350473,0.6902505,0.00007050747,0.0051754927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003497475,0.00037150935,0.0041687973,0.00013578462,0.000017091374,0.000004904051,0.9766377,0.0013957777,0.00046683548,0.010898704,0.005292537,0.0002606094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012504925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014804848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001706533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024633422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834216},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4315754093","doi":"10.1177/09636625221141663","title":"Brain-computer interfaces, disability, and the stigma of refusal: A factorial vignette study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Vignette; Blame; Psychology; Anger; Stigma (botany); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12719089807302328,"score_gpt":0.3554422314485006,"score_spread":0.22825133337547734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315754093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98090947,0.000017420603,0.009923708,0.002561374,0.0021209822,0.00040972326,0.000010147411,0.00005109966,0.003996059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961126,0.000001999602,0.000024555913,0.000046088757,0.000101643476,0.000012216304,7.6042943e-7,0.000006059315,0.00019541357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986066,0.00014277073,0.00025219566,0.0003454041,0.0003818905,0.00027111208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851024,0.0009022561,0.00012029631,0.00029892978,0.000099985766,0.000068268535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002926656,0.00008825567,0.00018583234,0.00022559188,0.00031527743,0.000081055594,0.00034042908,0.000026911017,0.000104531224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003628203,0.000058645168,0.000036716363,0.0014245042,0.0060070544,0.00021030023,0.0003067367,0.00010957255,0.0000054641264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009824868,0.0015182445,0.22265713,0.00009483276,0.000344574,0.000008810914,0.112687826,0.000012915945,0.005440078,0.6126368,0.012003479,0.0316128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012661865,0.0023687768,0.6890675,0.00009446223,0.0001049142,0.000023283736,0.23590343,0.0015129334,0.00039899535,0.05453676,0.0028038423,0.0005232291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014629384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068439214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55810004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009168763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007407624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996698},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379509183","doi":"10.1177/09636625231174845","title":"Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Legitimacy; Ideology; Social psychology; Pandemic; Identity (music); Public health; Religious identity; Science communication; Vaccination; Skepticism; Psychology; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Public trust; Politics; Public engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Science education; Epistemology; Law; Immunology","score_opus":0.08528824625014327,"score_gpt":0.35604111844213426,"score_spread":0.270752872191991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379509183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99122864,0.00014976424,0.0012110746,0.0053450684,0.00012620294,0.00029851953,0.0000011077963,0.00006731897,0.0015723272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988737,0.00086863374,0.00009164226,0.00008802424,0.000024960387,0.000009501042,2.3173612e-7,0.0000050720623,0.000038220198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966735,0.000063553525,0.00030101236,0.0005860099,0.00161956,0.0007563221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887717,0.0002633328,0.00016677393,0.00020894961,0.00022174798,0.0002620059],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140306195,0.00010596886,0.0001537498,0.0022975693,0.004897867,0.001117623,0.0009347021,0.000041155163,0.000006989979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003914814,0.00008561908,0.000016104328,0.015136488,0.0040289634,0.004911371,0.00045643406,0.00022193535,7.1016495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005028285,0.000013680499,0.88567233,0.000033790275,0.0000010161069,0.000004688135,0.030147389,0.00005375074,0.003182969,0.080653705,0.0000040756786,0.00022757934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059872447,0.000037975282,0.8945514,0.0001404627,0.0000045724837,0.000018855615,0.06565197,0.0009956914,0.00007898187,0.037706517,0.00003924836,0.00017559505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014619736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042947184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020438933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027945044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999193},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4385997351","doi":"10.1177/09636625231191633","title":"Comparing the influence of intellectual humility, religiosity, and political conservatism on vaccine attitudes in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Religiosity; Humility; Conservatism; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13272707038701692,"score_gpt":0.32958762949980164,"score_spread":0.19686055911278472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385997351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96254885,0.00003188012,0.000065331355,0.03655996,0.00004109161,0.00022129458,0.0000038126886,0.000015278942,0.0005124958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851334,0.00016898922,0.0000057280495,0.0012811479,0.000012177538,0.0000034812713,0.0000022911254,0.0000032403625,0.000009593877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798554,0.0003298727,0.0002778044,0.00020688084,0.0007518289,0.00044808126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497116,0.004449796,0.000105389474,0.00021981413,0.00016182332,0.000092047056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004758699,0.00009335938,0.00018299962,0.00037821606,0.0013119987,0.00020865194,0.0007591115,0.000029774026,0.000004263091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032913326,0.00005170839,0.000016831737,0.0041317334,0.0021351683,0.00022948337,0.0002468457,0.00021630713,2.4201097e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023424023,0.0000132287,0.30560422,0.000015682504,0.00000625956,0.0000018514812,0.014971449,0.00019858211,0.000016927343,0.6786337,0.0005094531,0.0000052455757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081282586,0.00006058197,0.90168196,0.00013224725,0.000014418329,0.0000039538086,0.04624494,0.0037024799,0.000028835766,0.046516344,0.00067544414,0.00012594167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71224624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6035366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63211733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025774314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006872518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387388262","doi":"10.3109/a036854","title":"Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Journalism; Public relations; Advice (programming); Popular science; Science communication; Media literacy; Literacy; Sociology; Psychology; Science education; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Media studies; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4662405871462212,"score_gpt":0.4757859517315292,"score_spread":0.009545364585308025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387388262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370896,0.001434321,0.00021916028,0.055773716,0.00026312974,0.0006876861,0.0000021377655,0.00002004537,0.004510188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890702,0.010081815,0.00009813735,0.0006221491,0.000016106505,0.00001680906,0.0000011744314,0.0000039207803,0.00008969128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700236,0.00024682702,0.00028172403,0.0003253689,0.001680796,0.00046289113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987953,0.00022881423,0.00011319447,0.00050116575,0.00017164163,0.00018989653],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007027174,0.000093256596,0.00015437674,0.00040202303,0.0018958008,0.001769384,0.0022767321,0.00003377953,0.00005905536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005688871,0.000063805805,0.000025191617,0.0034740805,0.004759128,0.0033382867,0.00063331035,0.00009113442,0.000002526945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035769124,0.0001921994,0.037860144,0.00001377632,0.0000027412466,5.005908e-7,0.931958,0.000018062563,0.0049391496,0.010556545,0.00089147023,0.013531604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012998837,0.00005920589,0.006751509,0.00018787978,0.0000034317272,0.0000018622067,0.9674837,0.0002959218,0.00007884312,0.00020414173,0.024705723,0.00009781412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012586949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010738321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055151567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006353502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001991493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389735731","doi":"10.1177/09636625231210453","title":"Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Genome Alberta; Ontario Genomics; Genome Canada","keywords":"Publics; Typology; Public engagement; Perception; Public relations; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Public awareness of science; Public opinion; Political science; Science communication; Social science; Epistemology; Science education","score_opus":0.8881191807214109,"score_gpt":0.5376860809207465,"score_spread":0.3504330998006644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389735731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95534253,0.000010991042,0.00013545997,0.023390733,0.00016955093,0.0005012266,0.0000068149097,0.0000564854,0.020386195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947697,0.00032142826,0.00005724312,0.000021156742,0.000033348293,0.000030596835,0.0000036528675,0.0000072735684,0.00004832734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678093,0.00072925177,0.0003986844,0.0002829911,0.001128705,0.0006794557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974471,0.0010643143,0.00018052931,0.00052095734,0.00061386183,0.00017327265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016451102,0.000077206816,0.0001493067,0.001716396,0.003586164,0.0005574241,0.001257847,0.000055355995,0.00014592631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034408073,0.00006651736,0.000039177503,0.009982299,0.008094069,0.0010764314,0.00052371644,0.00030429394,0.000009271024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025639388,0.00023809112,0.20641805,0.000013671382,0.000006606038,0.00001143861,0.3133252,0.000007280933,0.00026779293,0.47538546,0.00012328697,0.004200546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021706331,0.000048314632,0.005793029,0.000012940436,0.0000021845733,0.000022477154,0.98679036,0.0012118393,9.150698e-7,0.0049835886,0.0008487683,0.000068524685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045940485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17875786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67346513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014372341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001103078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997711},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391321098","doi":"10.1177/09636625231220226","title":"The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Skepticism; Politics; Reflexivity; Newspaper; Neutrality; Climate change; Sociology; Climate science; News media; Political science; Social science; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Epistemology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.600456464784278,"score_gpt":0.4432853046471829,"score_spread":0.15717116013709514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391321098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34346318,0.003311535,0.0006527372,0.21600762,0.002865368,0.0010082244,0.0001303112,0.00018103728,0.43237996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547887,0.004314762,0.00003446246,0.00007181209,0.000056245906,0.0000070235565,0.000003276949,0.0000038026217,0.0000297578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.000073324234,0.00019533472,0.00011875014,0.00038497496,0.00051231973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908316,0.00036691377,0.000049465612,0.00017228018,0.00012562591,0.00020256962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028767062,0.000046862504,0.00006960198,0.00047665794,0.0010640136,0.00024452884,0.0005051588,0.00003620429,0.00008027781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069112075,0.000038183243,0.000022154836,0.0016730573,0.002993666,0.00046663595,0.00006950288,0.00007241466,0.0000037042464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2420843e-7,0.000005184835,0.0066816434,0.00001655848,7.8460914e-7,2.0521219e-7,0.05040213,4.7361166e-7,0.000028222874,0.9417414,0.000011989987,0.0011110775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023855161,0.000050909548,0.06915296,0.0007576878,0.000015044158,0.00000334533,0.62365294,0.009259347,0.0001694333,0.22570175,0.07061453,0.0003835065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13631098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69084173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71603966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001254051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010440118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391321383","doi":"10.1177/09636625231219853","title":"Who are the publics engaging in AI?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publics; Affordance; Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.4211150533307218,"score_gpt":0.4773886732174504,"score_spread":0.056273619886728576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391321383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004324599,0.8869152,0.00014660475,0.031626772,0.0011863186,0.0004924949,0.000015099312,0.0000708251,0.07954233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02034361,0.97852385,0.000021143504,0.00029417346,0.00023209286,0.000014353679,0.0000014070146,0.000025119398,0.00054422766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955237,0.00048030712,0.000599997,0.0005511907,0.0018554637,0.0009893378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974536,0.0010352428,0.00046951554,0.0004007284,0.0003564988,0.00028444492],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018619217,0.0002656649,0.0009015475,0.0012189118,0.00266565,0.0033967253,0.0024680137,0.00033540477,0.000026562797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069894716,0.00017867133,0.00029115708,0.0077537703,0.010108727,0.0018722861,0.00042607798,0.0016947854,0.000012527536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8214273e-7,0.000016187782,0.000023847248,0.0011919879,0.000017746259,0.000003919314,0.016755467,1.8467229e-7,4.8885603e-8,0.9421451,0.0012134082,0.038631927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034004785,0.000009423458,0.0000025405798,0.006995505,0.00007374709,0.0000012662131,0.05713418,0.000016888776,5.9800016e-8,0.07882499,0.85667217,0.00023521666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000948335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003032106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002536026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008189794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986327},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391650317","doi":"10.1177/09636625241227091","title":"Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public relations; Public engagement; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027256239789286853,"score_gpt":0.2803478450636607,"score_spread":0.2530916052743738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391650317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82386804,0.0065590045,0.1490122,0.018847935,0.0010737011,0.00041162138,0.0000086044565,0.000037399637,0.00018153153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805033,0.0012333746,0.0005205027,0.00009538115,0.00006544662,0.000009484726,0.0000070044252,0.000007327509,0.000011131572],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990742,0.000013417728,0.00019329369,0.00022240556,0.0002349152,0.0002617269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954873,0.000026144222,0.000034433095,0.0001702974,0.0001319487,0.00008841446],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008022786,0.000087047934,0.00006842853,0.0002826798,0.00020297237,0.0026756227,0.00023543791,0.00003842984,0.000007691663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004106691,0.000059665697,0.000013707773,0.0012227305,0.00030821288,0.0004959807,0.00018762099,0.0000650567,0.0000011441842],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010565891,0.000046160243,0.0030932825,0.0003033082,0.00004447608,0.0000031905713,0.01957755,0.0010540484,0.83607876,0.052385677,0.00085830357,0.08654467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007465232,0.0003991147,0.002828265,0.0009779132,0.000033270717,0.00011951171,0.38914433,0.016542627,0.5038509,0.0040713614,0.08036019,0.00092600274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042930915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005748783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36956677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081235885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022801348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983597},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4403332823","doi":"10.1177/09636625241268881","title":"Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preprint; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Population; Pandemic; Term (time); Media studies; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7307891558044088,"score_gpt":0.5019906325918755,"score_spread":0.22879852321253336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403332823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3834761,0.004326119,0.116546266,0.21897282,0.0030381752,0.002077099,0.00007419782,0.00013754678,0.27135167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.00037529352,0.00032006405,0.00008609577,0.00005374622,0.000013095848,0.0000010170428,0.000011325547,0.00030705193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859081,0.001418442,0.001538302,0.0013485334,0.008651773,0.0011348337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680604,0.009604,0.00075706147,0.0014645549,0.0010963434,0.0002720249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10307218,0.0002191284,0.000620451,0.0043774927,0.0007633868,0.004341419,0.007400257,0.00015533518,0.00013592732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03439563,0.00013396659,0.00018097056,0.02655848,0.010060229,0.006524354,0.0013618349,0.00093182345,0.000013554297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014812614,0.00008943688,0.018611152,0.00016005697,0.000019234612,0.000011680931,0.009973641,0.000027036773,0.0012617958,0.95650387,0.0065730033,0.0067542996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033125884,0.00012000975,0.0028176683,0.00089914026,0.000013438459,0.00004474296,0.27611342,0.0063596456,0.0008198417,0.70391,0.008272677,0.00029813655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023563232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032930536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6153562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009776802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022460704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797016},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404044890","doi":"10.1177/09636625241287392","title":"Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Division of Social and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Legitimacy; Narrative; Sociology; Agriculture; Civil society; Public relations; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.048799362416089245,"score_gpt":0.28788765434738717,"score_spread":0.23908829193129794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404044890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98822033,0.0016085319,0.007913547,0.0020952635,0.000032305135,0.0000758462,0.000026000504,0.0000015603082,0.00002661875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996412,0.00016803805,0.0001284958,0.00002417469,0.000011694585,0.0000016863576,0.000019381223,0.0000016772844,0.000003688794],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935216,0.000026261543,0.00016707432,0.00014047348,0.00018473304,0.00012931296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996844,0.00011177027,0.000047476395,0.00008367991,0.000039830084,0.000032826167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005487733,0.00006112892,0.00013104474,0.00015191597,0.000040947987,0.00003642894,0.00015676685,0.000025894653,6.0732464e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076099874,0.0000353737,0.000018065282,0.0009648331,0.00060914,0.000007836,0.00004051435,0.00007558308,1.9371946e-9],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044284352,0.00005031608,0.09192382,0.00011644953,0.00048629162,0.000003977833,0.03976287,0.0084446715,0.8448832,0.012089999,0.0018897151,0.0003044193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020624346,0.000729837,0.25341055,0.00028172196,0.00043851385,0.00004048778,0.38775957,0.065848164,0.28238618,0.0043693776,0.0020131154,0.00066004426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02725651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21007955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.562497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034638397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017565908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97922105},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4411809595","doi":"10.1177/09636625251347063","title":"Contesting state expertise after COVID-19","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Negotiation; CONTEST; Political science; Public relations; Scholarship; State (computer science); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Boundary-work; Pandemic; Sociology; Transformational leadership; Social science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.25988621924541716,"score_gpt":0.41929784124342706,"score_spread":0.1594116219980099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411809595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18010084,0.0007593555,0.117663495,0.05666744,0.0009095385,0.00044131905,0.0000090229305,0.00024761594,0.64320135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595225,0.00004825374,0.00026851194,0.0020933847,0.000021086067,0.0000114255345,2.9518372e-7,0.000002290968,0.0016025271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981715,0.0003775153,0.00024150725,0.0003091876,0.00046909123,0.0004311764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973175,0.0018987177,0.00014873489,0.00017470402,0.00013259142,0.0003277414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007477468,0.00008255467,0.00014728065,0.00025270128,0.0020082744,0.0002762803,0.00058627006,0.000050995874,0.00026698122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016468687,0.00007424362,0.000050203173,0.0017830717,0.007903576,0.0013340323,0.00013904793,0.00014568907,0.0000041571802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005029984,0.00003518655,0.01484908,0.00001452809,0.000007637218,0.0000081939625,0.02193565,0.0000029666583,0.0003598443,0.96137995,0.0002123961,0.0011442961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043010752,0.000056478537,0.00092680246,0.00005626197,0.0000086976825,0.0000011970408,0.11148812,0.00014421508,0.00013374756,0.8256875,0.060839333,0.0002275045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005022093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016401858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008904789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002277796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999291},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4414525180","doi":"10.1177/09636625251367685","title":"Scientists’ public engagement goals: Perceived importance and personal prioritization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Public engagement; Sense of agency; Agency (philosophy); Prioritization; Social engagement; Survey data collection; Goal setting; Social media","score_opus":0.586152365656085,"score_gpt":0.45622151658434057,"score_spread":0.1299308490717444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414525180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65444803,0.00043180032,0.013633014,0.043025795,0.00070547586,0.0005086316,0.000011240443,0.00014821927,0.28708777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709636,0.0016335803,0.00046101707,0.00021865613,0.000023471039,0.000008241807,0.000006148419,0.0000032674632,0.0005492581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982951,0.00015319705,0.00021825002,0.00030693534,0.0006647893,0.00036169513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990619,0.00015095674,0.00012428458,0.00020456362,0.00030501827,0.00015327618],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043111406,0.0000780631,0.00011080966,0.00057706545,0.0031335985,0.00067287765,0.0005266941,0.00004753646,0.00033302433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011693024,0.00008207522,0.000029136834,0.0022698317,0.0049930625,0.0011685243,0.00019509225,0.000105921856,0.0000024757721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029798618,0.00006180437,0.07605051,0.000033722325,0.0000057204,1.958637e-7,0.039434034,2.2996853e-7,0.0032245137,0.8744808,0.00036653725,0.0063389684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001023054,0.000066586894,0.29339024,0.00024937565,0.000027702481,0.0000023616847,0.588935,0.00432782,0.000060426002,0.042349424,0.06905962,0.00050834304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010921652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010135601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093882845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007881685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417414414","doi":"10.1177/09636625251372820","title":"Shedding light on public perceptions of scientists who engage in wrongness admission amidst a failed replication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Perception; Public engagement; Public trust; Work (physics); Science communication; Public funding; Psychological science","score_opus":0.3669841485490524,"score_gpt":0.44967322132672016,"score_spread":0.08268907277766774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417414414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71490246,0.00005121745,0.0066999677,0.029372185,0.0004308202,0.0005327551,0.000009910248,0.00010766675,0.24789304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986021,0.00042181156,0.0002014948,0.000084980915,0.000017436727,0.00002033948,0.000008751785,0.0000051095094,0.00063799525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976431,0.0002845236,0.00041849696,0.00046155835,0.00079016556,0.00040216776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982716,0.0002787398,0.00024171003,0.0007083748,0.0003388442,0.00016076282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006194891,0.000101689766,0.00019518653,0.0017171189,0.0018431323,0.0003106772,0.0010578918,0.000090091184,0.0003455948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029564851,0.00010237513,0.00005769285,0.0055150865,0.0025055623,0.00113392,0.00020247306,0.00019081033,0.0000050269273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014616717,0.00027974843,0.042522598,0.00006007267,0.000003894402,1.9602466e-7,0.04054503,0.000008198897,0.028071353,0.8784505,0.00035906382,0.009684716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017624184,0.00019508362,0.38325107,0.0019690718,0.000025744916,0.0000012938963,0.5473165,0.0070614205,0.0028029962,0.0322892,0.022592764,0.0007324339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030925212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022204323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018092019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007912947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}