{"meta":{"query_hash":"be4a03ae57b2","filters":{"venue":"Public Understanding of Science"},"cohort_total":84,"direct_labels_cover":30,"predictions_cover":84,"exported":84,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/be4a03ae57b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Public+Understanding+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1824962959","doi":"10.1177/0963662507060586","title":"Experts’ understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public opinion; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Control (management); Public relations; Expert elicitation; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Politics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.5543987976542909,"score_gpt":0.43988476063267096,"score_spread":0.11451403702161994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824962959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7736119,0.0014647254,0.013512195,0.061193235,0.0001493689,0.0000768085,0.00004230864,0.000037903923,0.14991158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808383,0.00012028915,0.0002493274,0.00087299827,0.00003910979,0.00001004731,0.000008662172,0.0000045541565,0.00061125983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.946057,0.029722948,0.0015191516,0.0030578768,0.014657785,0.004985294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8553207,0.111910254,0.013014275,0.0055296104,0.010704964,0.0035201684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048302915,0.0005375384,0.0010194484,0.006050535,0.01913804,0.019132031,0.0019912869,0.0062597557,0.0033122716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09062374,0.00056972,0.0006308158,0.0031183003,0.054900352,0.012445743,0.0108542675,0.0072280467,0.00018445063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001175511,0.000077686156,0.017642712,0.000153046,0.00005575575,0.0007659153,0.7618497,0.00078617607,0.0010350503,0.19486198,0.0019840996,0.020670347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000836438,0.000090736656,0.022361731,0.0005634832,0.00010059162,0.0004695756,0.6269533,0.002256035,0.0013241088,0.27945936,0.06618375,0.00015367643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07049539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03904383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98086196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016049841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019883089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2554533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904970715","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/1/303","title":"What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured? A multidimensional model","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Theme (computing); Scientific literature; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.5649196279989956,"score_gpt":0.4116867703268896,"score_spread":0.15323285767210604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904970715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44457978,0.008665271,0.26340923,0.05450243,0.000509219,0.0015072266,0.0016289422,0.00016047533,0.22503738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96238726,0.0017069572,0.03291758,0.00053345313,0.00008431814,0.0009016247,0.00023471279,0.00001707273,0.0012170576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98363197,0.010527599,0.0009698922,0.0016658509,0.0023918236,0.0008129029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609937,0.02547345,0.0054656165,0.0021222096,0.0041745706,0.0017704376],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013344445,0.001215374,0.0011741314,0.007865193,0.0024324374,0.012496464,0.0020252233,0.0027721887,0.0036408824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03548066,0.0005631818,0.0018708112,0.008735845,0.011931504,0.011487501,0.0049193185,0.0024347932,0.00047364997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081592276,0.0003151913,0.07308425,0.0006066966,0.00038451128,0.0002408853,0.02158509,0.008347491,0.00038496114,0.84771144,0.0019595586,0.0452983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008683565,0.00030460954,0.058286082,0.0014673991,0.00031798973,0.00040999387,0.027957715,0.06963056,0.000340873,0.8141648,0.026834207,0.00019902199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008299742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003227334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99756753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009975863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047193817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072380304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966136681","doi":"10.1177/0963662511403039","title":"Risk assessment as rhetorical practice: The ironic mathematics behind terrorism, banking, and public policy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Rhetorical question; Contingency plan; Homeland security; Contingency; Politics; Risk management; Risk assessment; Recession; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.17087508854613304,"score_gpt":0.39876971213486123,"score_spread":0.2278946235887282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966136681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053273503,0.023731185,0.030806534,0.567763,0.0028638435,0.000051611405,0.000049899656,0.00010392833,0.32135648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594802,0.006216121,0.0056337183,0.016849224,0.0027396826,0.00008433582,0.000020492433,0.000101734724,0.008874426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865541,0.010185974,0.00027059417,0.0005092567,0.0021005867,0.0003795049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633698,0.031441715,0.0020819493,0.00093026255,0.0016064232,0.00056977203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013198412,0.00068543747,0.0005014713,0.003131272,0.008814491,0.01549531,0.0011571276,0.0060019223,0.0024681883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02923352,0.0003626644,0.0003367988,0.002049652,0.06544409,0.017598445,0.0043209014,0.008068377,0.0005017024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011436987,0.000018997738,0.00019014422,0.000071384784,0.0000044251065,0.000060587518,0.03594534,0.00016038585,0.000119134675,0.95055586,0.0063901213,0.0064721084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025043384,0.00003006628,0.00045348424,0.0003379265,0.000010073949,0.00013635546,0.02048894,0.0008680528,0.00029613558,0.8770838,0.100251585,0.000018568346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017082097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011672371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059133642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039418275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069800675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966157167","doi":"10.1177/0963662505047525","title":"Time and the structuring of ritual performance in the xenotransplantation debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Xenotransplantation; Environmental ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Public relations; Transplantation; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03953893554580601,"score_gpt":0.26641566368995995,"score_spread":0.22687672814415394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966157167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64478475,0.009674159,0.021881195,0.104897805,0.0011775966,0.00012549726,0.000067056135,0.00009000091,0.21730207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942924,0.0007927109,0.0010794869,0.0016229834,0.0001335776,0.000048431968,0.000012626223,0.00003228499,0.0019854917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460072,0.04626229,0.0010832301,0.0012610733,0.0028397376,0.0025465416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94799966,0.039651968,0.0061388556,0.0017358193,0.0019698206,0.0025040137],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032880515,0.00039426316,0.0006130379,0.0029439405,0.01976226,0.012859201,0.0015377736,0.004005626,0.0028961638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04813266,0.00045912186,0.00047133563,0.002334516,0.07141944,0.013221267,0.011507688,0.006331126,0.0003626988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011237615,0.000026365367,0.0017746999,0.00010023311,0.000014825896,0.0003201955,0.6090554,0.000206815,0.0007577253,0.374534,0.0019983975,0.011098927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048131413,0.00010028158,0.0047502755,0.0006715433,0.000025275385,0.0003619253,0.59475315,0.00050215394,0.0013146582,0.16794223,0.2294019,0.00012848467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004742462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004972613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096148625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076264916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17389089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981739046","doi":"10.1177/0963662513495149","title":"Public media communications about H1N1, risk perceptions and immunization behaviours: A Quebec–France comparison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; McGill University","keywords":"Credibility; Risk communication; Perception; Public health; Risk perception; Pandemic; Agency (philosophy); Health communication; Public relations; Population; Order (exchange); Compliance (psychology); Environmental health; Political science; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Nursing; Disease","score_opus":0.1611894976693929,"score_gpt":0.3483433421483837,"score_spread":0.1871538444789908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981739046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992025,0.0010872555,0.00014498552,0.00045948607,0.000021550544,0.000055638684,0.0012875244,0.0000098397395,0.0049087508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618536,0.00028048642,0.00008572401,0.00012868967,0.00001202325,0.000042565796,0.00070769805,0.0000047670724,0.0025527996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982504,0.0005818429,0.00009654929,0.00019967508,0.00045020526,0.0004213204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922191,0.0025879876,0.0014389944,0.00019641701,0.0027411971,0.0008163175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019933442,0.0005211803,0.00048692193,0.0026254784,0.002002022,0.0023942683,0.00083573547,0.0012654286,0.007825531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007727684,0.00018911058,0.000746413,0.0027993734,0.0010188372,0.0010480079,0.0012257805,0.0008199633,0.00043914517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012029851,0.0005099833,0.96592736,0.00014529465,0.0005315937,0.00033683126,0.007991495,0.00039521683,0.00046111437,0.0006163017,0.0031594485,0.0187224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035950896,0.00019613377,0.99167025,0.000046003875,0.000091635105,0.000060588773,0.00537925,0.00052134885,0.000057509504,0.000029987694,0.0018856317,0.000025669166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9639489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036051095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020244172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007121075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14688247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984233276","doi":"10.1177/0963662506076138","title":"Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public actor","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Ambivalence; Autonomy; Modernity; Late modernity; Social science; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.6134299573489076,"score_gpt":0.44679511623572876,"score_spread":0.16663484111317883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984233276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16002251,0.00328856,0.087620854,0.15984327,0.0004892028,0.00009580826,0.000049446196,0.00008972867,0.5885006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991071,0.00032664425,0.0027636676,0.0016457711,0.000095397736,0.00003651276,0.000010397506,0.000021210912,0.0040295734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460466,0.008477442,0.00052162795,0.0019896284,0.0022771067,0.0021296623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749028,0.01733651,0.0018978568,0.002768906,0.001849741,0.0012442134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021404216,0.0004721534,0.0006567229,0.0026146662,0.009852223,0.010031374,0.0014318901,0.005304375,0.006486198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035218168,0.0004615887,0.00075569545,0.001301214,0.049737513,0.020999474,0.012354926,0.005599576,0.000560582],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001337313,0.000013867621,0.00076156907,0.000021070131,0.0000050154263,0.000114264505,0.016883504,0.0002693255,0.00011471096,0.9755181,0.0011560889,0.0051291008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001651387,0.000008147593,0.00051236246,0.00006577756,0.000008265771,0.0000736416,0.009152722,0.0007154534,0.00015571293,0.9699811,0.019294048,0.00001624478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013736157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008611789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99014777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074347183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008616677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113197684},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1984500656","doi":"10.1177/0963662508091806","title":"Analysis of an innovative survey platform: comparison of the public’s responses to human health and salmon genomics surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nerd; Genomics; Public health; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Biology; Genome; Pathology; Genetics","score_opus":0.7890295842147376,"score_gpt":0.5099727285029798,"score_spread":0.27905685571175776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984500656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99321425,0.000024921472,0.0018396089,0.00045138685,0.00001829882,0.00028590614,0.00030023803,0.000024397017,0.0038408795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957367,0.000032338427,0.0021374447,0.0003425081,0.00001695653,0.00057735946,0.0005245707,0.000018086559,0.0006140944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9226243,0.058267515,0.0023982786,0.0025964114,0.011536058,0.0025775393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7571622,0.17312543,0.02687851,0.014177132,0.025812961,0.0028437967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055653136,0.00037016085,0.0006879279,0.0043668724,0.0013463912,0.0021979578,0.000940938,0.0016937872,0.001700049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15421635,0.00052652974,0.00079429767,0.0038096372,0.002582595,0.002564203,0.006152531,0.0014843789,0.0003475295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002644795,0.0014223601,0.80801404,0.00047150248,0.00032626744,0.0004273431,0.089495,0.002401301,0.0070478204,0.0037320005,0.0022517897,0.08176563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012166963,0.00205244,0.92720425,0.00007840964,0.000063741914,0.00015124798,0.056075662,0.0043644477,0.0030198435,0.0013853799,0.0053638,0.000119141674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007855462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007014389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94434685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043750713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035829658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29432547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988131571","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335523","title":"Biobanking, public consultation, and the discursive logics of deliberation: Five lessons from British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public relations; Sociology; Public discourse; Political science; Public involvement; Public engagement; Public participation; Public awareness of science; Science communication; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.41217215206023217,"score_gpt":0.4722221365860229,"score_spread":0.060049984525790745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988131571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433577,0.0047116266,0.0013995714,0.051035084,0.00011682301,0.00020112612,0.00019069808,0.000041535568,0.098945886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97706145,0.0017005177,0.00089652825,0.003089037,0.000011302929,0.00008681084,0.000084014784,0.000038632887,0.01703168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272764,0.0034763967,0.00019809317,0.00049295183,0.0009785471,0.0021263235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782574,0.014319026,0.0006610552,0.00060785294,0.0030032406,0.0031514284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007188882,0.00041904408,0.0006615669,0.002190859,0.042678982,0.01067595,0.0026129123,0.0029374324,0.0041184635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016981617,0.0006323734,0.00026872024,0.0054065743,0.017111225,0.0027281113,0.0078056487,0.0053082206,0.0003093958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016106156,0.0001437472,0.018317759,0.00026079247,0.000025175243,0.0036014426,0.88567024,0.000530955,0.00096962164,0.03796919,0.012774191,0.039575797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023975634,0.00002531723,0.020948771,0.0004890089,0.000022478904,0.00018076878,0.9049278,0.0004905775,0.00044526235,0.0051328894,0.067224085,0.00008915609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99163646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95732105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15847339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1675101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97605157},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1997466337","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335410","title":"In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Prima facie; Experiential knowledge; Public relations; Public participation; Biobank; Political science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.29838816263940077,"score_gpt":0.38839630512434764,"score_spread":0.09000814248494687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997466337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391932,0.00027943664,0.02045985,0.0054341163,0.00008741394,0.00049218506,0.00004721388,0.0000422759,0.033964377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954353,0.00008273668,0.003368983,0.00037463466,0.000025762545,0.0003005687,0.000014891572,0.0000100517445,0.00038712667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8030018,0.17453592,0.003200508,0.003737479,0.011398227,0.004126169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55581653,0.40374875,0.02023976,0.007290444,0.010370876,0.0025335718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14511625,0.00082758855,0.00071926217,0.004304159,0.0072531095,0.010175376,0.001742292,0.0050675804,0.00341269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2663285,0.0008487469,0.00072492764,0.0022714909,0.011146794,0.011259978,0.012253624,0.004412472,0.00040512515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015335743,0.0010516096,0.058518693,0.00071968336,0.00023985065,0.0011113738,0.8197982,0.0020833984,0.0038571174,0.021764418,0.0011755322,0.08814645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027352935,0.001493419,0.054826923,0.001124855,0.00036147292,0.0006437115,0.84106845,0.009735511,0.008169628,0.06193955,0.020121675,0.00024133957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019341359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002427511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052412353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063326024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76745725},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2011153353","doi":"10.1177/0963662513490466","title":"Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Worry; Opposition (politics); Animal welfare; Demographics; Public engagement; Intervention (counseling); Welfare; Psychology; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Biology; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.9049595305333119,"score_gpt":0.4314383528755984,"score_spread":0.4735211776577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011153353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931757,0.000067836634,0.001309494,0.0011857193,0.000026845251,0.00010377941,0.000040508803,0.000014244141,0.004075951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965256,0.00012055716,0.0011772005,0.00077523856,0.000028556024,0.00032003454,0.000038412592,0.000011244425,0.001003269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97627366,0.019819513,0.00056221953,0.00067991565,0.0013597113,0.0013049662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9086319,0.07581403,0.0076355706,0.001992401,0.0032883366,0.0026376832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025315968,0.0005784108,0.0005259231,0.0011054702,0.0030472656,0.0048899166,0.0007964548,0.002400938,0.005136903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04766109,0.0004091232,0.0005250228,0.0005634041,0.0030338417,0.0039975927,0.0050207614,0.0031289882,0.00068562885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066919206,0.0010276521,0.06693064,0.0005136611,0.00006364023,0.00078277866,0.89614403,0.0002997482,0.006146749,0.0019259133,0.0013193426,0.02417673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013810441,0.0016773304,0.04566047,0.00048785983,0.00008545561,0.00046407874,0.92460567,0.002089678,0.0020225984,0.002174328,0.020451408,0.00014289246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014749259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014588125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014358022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008700648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13388526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012209553","doi":"10.1177/0963662508098575","title":"Food, publics, science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Public awareness of science; Citizen science; Science communication; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Biology; Science education; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1837613329618355,"score_gpt":0.3122339638260476,"score_spread":0.12847263086421212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012209553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023474148,0.038243324,0.0034985757,0.2782143,0.00106836,0.00003184095,0.00013153529,0.00014566406,0.6551922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002136,0.020111421,0.0015744586,0.028405804,0.0016006762,0.00008468198,0.000121543126,0.000108486995,0.047779348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367213,0.0042948416,0.00008574733,0.00055445253,0.00075208925,0.0006407939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952584,0.0030504796,0.0004422971,0.00039733708,0.00044469713,0.0004067981],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063028317,0.0006251822,0.0005910917,0.0031056257,0.011530562,0.020124085,0.0009327639,0.007065434,0.016370874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006126406,0.00022762362,0.00029945985,0.0041893297,0.0484929,0.014128291,0.0061702435,0.0042217495,0.0013058772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000958499,0.000027529279,0.00042237598,0.00008984061,0.0000042744136,0.00009864765,0.0119769955,0.000108868684,0.000058385463,0.960784,0.015331905,0.011087637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000902009,0.00002521615,0.000890141,0.00027168888,0.0000062382096,0.00012363093,0.028231028,0.00008945078,0.00008460368,0.34298626,0.62726957,0.000013126883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018777406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013828606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014134754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008288846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102555335},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2024455479","doi":"10.1177/0963662510363379","title":"Foodborne microbial risks in the press","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Homogeneous; Public discourse; Media coverage; Outbreak; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Biology; Media studies","score_opus":0.17883834142566918,"score_gpt":0.2801366180116121,"score_spread":0.10129827658594293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024455479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17216071,0.05767975,0.00079099386,0.15307865,0.0015365815,0.000030475163,0.00051752,0.00008227195,0.614123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239438,0.027010104,0.000422555,0.008482546,0.0021371834,0.00003050733,0.00024315942,0.000048937552,0.037681136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826163,0.0007537123,0.000048746584,0.000077462995,0.0006244837,0.00023394256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993166,0.0044755847,0.0008966086,0.0002481351,0.0008756909,0.0003380203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002288278,0.0005048364,0.00025453712,0.0035193625,0.0032591838,0.01352144,0.00039156948,0.0019363434,0.012866988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071243695,0.00027155952,0.0001824602,0.0032189374,0.0068853884,0.003495864,0.002084473,0.0016286816,0.00090931804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022785523,0.00015684428,0.022494655,0.000991353,0.00008329027,0.0029379893,0.25387856,0.0009526651,0.0037129198,0.4044522,0.11414402,0.19596761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016185431,0.000046713612,0.02992056,0.00122274,0.000048477476,0.0004794979,0.06821063,0.0002922724,0.0007379669,0.028957536,0.8700313,0.000036052625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05282865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044530608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009048245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038986187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10504228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033947970","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/301","title":"Assessing a controversial medical technology: Canadian public consultations on xenotransplantation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Jury; Constructive; Public health; Public opinion; Political science; Publics; Democracy; Public relations; Public administration; Process (computing); Law; Medicine; Nursing; Politics","score_opus":0.6234218180529332,"score_gpt":0.5204227652734262,"score_spread":0.10299905277950694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033947970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32199737,0.00529564,0.0043115844,0.5803892,0.00091345515,0.00028976685,0.00023919028,0.000089385314,0.08647436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94615734,0.002257982,0.0034784812,0.03862455,0.00020672102,0.0001158858,0.00007327879,0.000025250245,0.009060433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565592,0.021306487,0.00084555504,0.0013424276,0.0119251935,0.008021179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9378146,0.048177358,0.0025646612,0.0006988576,0.0073826434,0.0033617674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044183765,0.00047758155,0.00063078874,0.002014412,0.045957226,0.009921475,0.0020713096,0.012808316,0.0029754513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06874952,0.00055497984,0.0007853643,0.0031631708,0.019609574,0.003181832,0.006571387,0.009734477,0.00021636431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006536226,0.0003468435,0.015375159,0.0007449471,0.0001129371,0.006229486,0.37996238,0.003794675,0.0032848597,0.34165162,0.13428645,0.113557056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031225174,0.0002964146,0.03195676,0.0009621791,0.00022012394,0.0007327633,0.37057456,0.0039928043,0.0045427918,0.055964172,0.5298592,0.0005860745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.890874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9331005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1343657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20804341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034078848","doi":"10.1177/0963662508097626","title":"Recruiting for representation in public deliberation on the ethics of biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Public relations; Representation (politics); Event (particle physics); Democracy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8892915425614092,"score_gpt":0.6111883534280442,"score_spread":0.27810318913336496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034078848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42176992,0.0010955888,0.13422744,0.33727095,0.0019486572,0.007257734,0.00011428051,0.0002969179,0.0960185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933514,0.0003999357,0.03315938,0.020604162,0.00041839143,0.0069015166,0.00004864938,0.000095313575,0.004858598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.3047884,0.6456584,0.009433708,0.0065821414,0.016727675,0.01680973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35038206,0.5588102,0.02939432,0.028481463,0.020471226,0.012460745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.57046616,0.00084932375,0.0014096696,0.0027553758,0.03007476,0.021424187,0.0043387963,0.011518325,0.006014646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48581222,0.0015557901,0.0009991009,0.002752776,0.039704986,0.014974583,0.033260413,0.0149136195,0.0016215846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006884202,0.00047198834,0.009811349,0.00049180083,0.00007060531,0.00094335753,0.627426,0.0018963271,0.0014916962,0.23800792,0.023802023,0.09489851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046740042,0.00052274874,0.005157535,0.00201776,0.00005665611,0.00039767398,0.39481533,0.0042619356,0.003212683,0.34897274,0.23989,0.00022756784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037993924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004644312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016922392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05663729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5296917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047411715","doi":"10.1177/0963662508088668","title":"Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychological intervention; Public relations; Relevance (law); Science communication; Media coverage; Order (exchange); News media; Public health; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Media studies; Business; Medicine; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.49057877625076257,"score_gpt":0.4444615329357097,"score_spread":0.04611724331505285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047411715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85927254,0.007278557,0.008333268,0.04637987,0.00053978746,0.00012617206,0.00018746087,0.00005491345,0.07782739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959907,0.0011757374,0.00076966424,0.0010190638,0.00034515362,0.00005704229,0.000034244422,0.000025300656,0.00058307726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538748,0.03378901,0.001750599,0.001851837,0.006503564,0.0022301828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6949383,0.26787475,0.02106491,0.0051974608,0.008464421,0.0024601363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04043856,0.00059629016,0.0011188447,0.009226978,0.006266448,0.017973859,0.0014932262,0.0032537004,0.0042740847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18092975,0.0008479192,0.00064258074,0.005048484,0.018942842,0.016365131,0.0091729155,0.0031800629,0.00046378493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038796192,0.000072190574,0.07269289,0.0012351542,0.00017139858,0.0009377221,0.80808544,0.00014473526,0.002048396,0.037708044,0.0015133383,0.07500274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047968682,0.00021011048,0.083299294,0.0027149324,0.00032833804,0.0009924694,0.81347156,0.0008200794,0.002565688,0.04870065,0.04673479,0.0001141015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002560453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022081682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003469739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028047909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21386212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052346044","doi":"10.1177/0963662506067662","title":"Parental views on pediatric vaccination: the impact of competing advocacy coalitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cancer Care Ontario; McGill University; York University; University of Toronto; Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Vaccination; Feeling; Public health; Vaccination policy; Focus group; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Immunology; Nursing","score_opus":0.16620912751457,"score_gpt":0.3706688252949526,"score_spread":0.2044596977803826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052346044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98375803,0.0013178637,0.00045791044,0.0066779586,0.000075609176,0.000022064569,0.000026802367,0.000004912315,0.0076588406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896705,0.00041326968,0.00012109652,0.0002464719,0.000012876547,0.000007392369,0.00001049753,0.0000022571696,0.00021905989],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98214173,0.012582884,0.0006072011,0.00055790885,0.00247,0.0016403171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642434,0.025574083,0.0044246125,0.00085453654,0.0023498673,0.002553524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0235667,0.00027100186,0.00041752207,0.0011244382,0.005178843,0.0054752044,0.0010262893,0.001398543,0.0023862782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05385323,0.00047277083,0.0006052041,0.0009212128,0.004137161,0.002362082,0.004007936,0.0026368028,0.00010043377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017266932,0.00007974625,0.23280674,0.00013416821,0.0001056845,0.0020260678,0.72456235,0.00017234473,0.00045677804,0.008462762,0.0012444106,0.029776292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033885135,0.00015906541,0.12978974,0.0004507807,0.0001398384,0.00091146753,0.85105556,0.00067696767,0.00052710035,0.0021621666,0.014034803,0.000058550777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06317379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07108697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06317379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008281488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006617834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1256122},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2056839815","doi":"10.1177/0963662507075649","title":"School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Public awareness of science; Promotion (chess); Science education; Science, technology, society and environment education; Science communication; Social science education; Sociology; Literacy; Political science; Public relations; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Social science; Engineering ethics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.183257703049856,"score_gpt":0.421375110627949,"score_spread":0.23811740757809302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056839815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026592875,0.03340876,0.0008477879,0.88215846,0.0020909898,0.000008485036,0.000055413086,0.000015262744,0.054821935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749294,0.026607063,0.0007045467,0.079320036,0.0071438323,0.000041076582,0.000064455366,0.000041880034,0.0111477915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993634,0.003431623,0.00019848744,0.0010891047,0.0009916737,0.0006550539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770882,0.016953155,0.002156717,0.00097485096,0.0017798508,0.0010472258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011307063,0.00027230332,0.0005766901,0.0031000136,0.01172425,0.01596757,0.0010083037,0.008279766,0.007536223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027529556,0.0002381295,0.00049394625,0.003572844,0.050092928,0.016706653,0.005206082,0.011797867,0.000663403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027935988,0.000060369475,0.0017532142,0.00020222564,0.000020037623,0.00009087916,0.019465655,0.00011533496,0.00010564077,0.9291958,0.020708824,0.028254107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018211425,0.000035317848,0.0039900397,0.00075206906,0.000018665482,0.000064739914,0.03258163,0.00011844611,0.0002759889,0.6011793,0.36093554,0.000030006819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010547867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009997148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98827577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012503628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009104509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090720594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059720664","doi":"10.1177/0963662512444682","title":"Progress, decline, and the public uptake of climate science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Ideology; Conservatism; Climate change; Blame; Narrative; Global warming; Divergence (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perception; Public opinion; Social psychology; Political economy; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.5307798169057809,"score_gpt":0.4478265359944933,"score_spread":0.08295328091128762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059720664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94978654,0.00053314195,0.00041128692,0.010972009,0.00003456867,0.000012786947,0.000032391432,0.000011326134,0.03820586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908173,0.00012918007,0.000040454717,0.00020561025,0.000015925276,0.0000040926216,0.000012062946,0.0000031815302,0.00050775736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278706,0.0035728791,0.00033002728,0.00047770437,0.002057617,0.0007746272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95160204,0.026103418,0.011170047,0.0019622345,0.0063016163,0.0028606432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014594925,0.0001932515,0.00029243316,0.0021176704,0.003906066,0.006153887,0.0007147166,0.0022828043,0.0040471507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04221965,0.0002752227,0.0002917008,0.0013362061,0.009099016,0.005647668,0.0062522674,0.005373733,0.00025498477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003323675,0.00040130535,0.2586208,0.00027050087,0.00010734936,0.00090569165,0.61923623,0.00058599,0.0019314274,0.0629018,0.0028105385,0.051896017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019102,0.00032591523,0.29999384,0.00042415838,0.00007312948,0.0004687789,0.60627174,0.0018832248,0.0017387823,0.041742995,0.046913818,0.00012344467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014258096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009490539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005095308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026838647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07718629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061854397","doi":"10.1177/0963662514563888","title":"Voices from other lands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Media studies; Kingdom; Political science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.4430785820135099,"score_gpt":0.40479552965437265,"score_spread":0.03828305235913726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061854397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08962637,0.024790041,0.0022890153,0.45923787,0.015607717,0.000029616791,0.00011975645,0.00009156974,0.40820798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7377774,0.011236476,0.00091150386,0.13779594,0.00471282,0.000040287763,0.00011926106,0.00027297434,0.107133426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99110466,0.0043801977,0.00021974274,0.000928536,0.0015885507,0.0017783019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224854,0.0033309981,0.0006752203,0.00066271407,0.0011189275,0.00196363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007166923,0.0005668287,0.000844576,0.0011373715,0.0117572155,0.015869852,0.0011627345,0.0064911377,0.012910589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015281307,0.00026385795,0.00050036306,0.0010596259,0.015766414,0.013563822,0.008449676,0.011807772,0.0028230774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098482655,0.00008893892,0.0025244413,0.00024383947,0.000049522412,0.0010174396,0.4322278,0.00006624354,0.0013552897,0.37455204,0.13969898,0.048076957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070404135,0.000025168798,0.0007855652,0.00036854297,0.000010031115,0.00031208832,0.22358745,0.000039525603,0.0002719964,0.039285537,0.7352776,0.000029505507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033273643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058485107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015869852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003555672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027729573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04319018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062160663","doi":"10.1177/0963662510394949","title":"Post-ecological discourse in the making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10116573810507386,"score_gpt":0.30952421107614275,"score_spread":0.2083584729710689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062160663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90503836,0.0017606808,0.002125004,0.0068118684,0.0000919878,0.000019293775,0.000048073,0.000027149928,0.08407745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967841,0.00018105107,0.000118074495,0.0000708679,0.000016135074,0.000004968084,0.000014694965,0.000008114819,0.002802041],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572444,0.0025273666,0.000105098756,0.00027573333,0.00080754224,0.00055986823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953994,0.0029523352,0.0005892067,0.00021145739,0.0004701478,0.00037754816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005145581,0.0006257545,0.00026321373,0.0023891816,0.007285066,0.0056570778,0.00070177106,0.0016227306,0.0046202918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046268776,0.00021703435,0.00028892444,0.0015656084,0.0149296485,0.004281836,0.004857581,0.0019110015,0.00042593206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026678805,0.000023004863,0.0049347864,0.000042314154,0.000005169772,0.00043595297,0.9323567,0.00009400662,0.0009357776,0.055272248,0.0005798602,0.0052935793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128413185,0.000055240387,0.022550516,0.00024687048,0.000018794757,0.00040391058,0.79560894,0.00048371786,0.0015500723,0.029105797,0.14992175,0.000041512892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009346124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010508357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99271494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004466478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022278184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032406688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062652729","doi":"10.1177/0963662504044559","title":"Engaging the public in the regulation of xenotransplantation: would the Canadian model of public consultation be effective in the US?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Public consultation; Xenotransplantation; Public opinion; Public relations; Elite; Political science; Value (mathematics); Public domain; Public administration; Transplantation; Medicine; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2526097649308369,"score_gpt":0.33847074226323237,"score_spread":0.08586097733239545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062652729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011745055,0.0022679316,0.005876892,0.8709215,0.0011804389,0.00025984002,0.000088864595,0.00009141637,0.10756797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64424074,0.003088687,0.014017863,0.30057082,0.0005635613,0.00050881825,0.0000888308,0.00009599349,0.036824767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9376673,0.025602818,0.0010143392,0.0038532242,0.017375927,0.014486333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480682,0.025886478,0.0024843197,0.002172739,0.01280848,0.008579691],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054492574,0.0007191248,0.0007861295,0.003481005,0.031487208,0.019759908,0.0031917868,0.021074392,0.006843849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07598184,0.0007895747,0.0015304434,0.00348613,0.037092477,0.009809836,0.009451353,0.017132442,0.00079396664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018681468,0.00014865259,0.0037048091,0.0003447947,0.000057172183,0.00045937984,0.019222574,0.00092747813,0.00061234285,0.8483706,0.09176454,0.03420091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052351947,0.00022954826,0.012169574,0.0011122486,0.00022191639,0.00045082535,0.03472362,0.0043096594,0.0013633353,0.24590611,0.69849354,0.00049607956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88107383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91668004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11081875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2834567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040501},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2063030201","doi":"10.1177/0963662507076603","title":"The meanings of genomics: a focus group study of “interested” and lay classifications of salmon genomics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Realm; Phenomenon; Genomics; Conflation; Focus group; Focus (optics); Psychology; Sociology; Data science; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Genetics; Genome","score_opus":0.615727767013,"score_gpt":0.4113988937783352,"score_spread":0.2043288732346648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063030201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977175,0.000045175035,0.00028813796,0.00081831735,0.000013613392,0.000039679715,0.000008433213,0.0000023566301,0.0010667609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777776,0.00009221248,0.00027499703,0.000868702,0.000019520143,0.00013703268,0.000014840514,0.000007925486,0.000806986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855063,0.011342344,0.00029076895,0.0006791644,0.0008219176,0.0013595088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96877915,0.02530079,0.0021574944,0.0006363662,0.0017563757,0.0013698393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023495533,0.00078121043,0.0007897019,0.00243845,0.017561188,0.005004514,0.0014814785,0.0042330767,0.0033686818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028774302,0.0009370468,0.00043460712,0.0011912119,0.015111037,0.007805298,0.006950233,0.005225135,0.00043422982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026600557,0.000088622284,0.0019261288,0.000014539085,0.0000020968682,0.000068253605,0.9964653,0.000004799884,0.00038298723,0.00038677535,0.0000795182,0.0005543776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012080738,0.00009558642,0.0022073798,0.000020153419,0.0000030138344,0.000036378497,0.99619555,0.000036378147,0.0001300547,0.00029566354,0.0009572304,0.000010529474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011914684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012030542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036439227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024766098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067747683","doi":"10.1177/0963662511412861","title":"The weight of communication: The <i>Canadian Medical Association Journal</i>’s discourse on obesity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Ideology; Rhetoric; Politics; Context (archaeology); Obesity; Association (psychology); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Exploratory research; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Media studies; Psychology; Medicine; Law; History; Pathology","score_opus":0.20865509824461292,"score_gpt":0.42792556798092374,"score_spread":0.2192704697363108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067747683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18023635,0.010128818,0.002380386,0.33793876,0.002352446,0.00008706792,0.000225311,0.00009885339,0.46655202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707228,0.0027021628,0.00093685614,0.014618505,0.0006514709,0.000060376395,0.00006591945,0.00007708103,0.010164756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825921,0.0054488215,0.00029791673,0.00085972715,0.0073492476,0.003452184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818751,0.009665597,0.0016621827,0.0004677168,0.0037424266,0.0025869908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012987606,0.0007099264,0.0006788876,0.008091235,0.059173964,0.025785174,0.0026833797,0.0074441615,0.0046875807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02567345,0.0005698734,0.00045333715,0.011371783,0.06358121,0.008316046,0.0098048765,0.010900482,0.00038492933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032293636,0.000021800242,0.0013517148,0.00013656738,0.000009225514,0.00048278528,0.7481664,0.000079702964,0.0003998259,0.21531217,0.022906326,0.011101246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016208669,0.000016417256,0.0047862,0.00058082986,0.000025380012,0.00024643683,0.59490716,0.00025227226,0.00032755107,0.014801998,0.3839652,0.000074276846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79748416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7555782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94082606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09200159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08768541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66752136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070091809","doi":"10.1177/09636625030122001","title":"University Students' Interpretation of Media Reports of Science and its Relationship to Background Knowledge, Interest, and Reading Difficulty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northwestern Polytechnic; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Reading (process); Psychology; Scientific literacy; Interpretation (philosophy); Variance (accounting); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Science education; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.23096740584485512,"score_gpt":0.40443844809828916,"score_spread":0.17347104225343404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070091809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999395,0.000042915155,0.00006440908,0.000025270103,0.000002325416,0.0000046733226,0.000016925853,0.0000054909133,0.00044279647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999413,0.00006655144,0.00012248284,0.0000150936685,0.000006291197,0.000007904359,0.000046105997,0.000003247697,0.00031923983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982823,0.0007324189,0.00023552719,0.00016881996,0.00040988487,0.0001711385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95168734,0.026928812,0.013301552,0.0019135119,0.0042522145,0.00191656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029459272,0.00046568294,0.00040241043,0.002600875,0.0006186317,0.0030948648,0.00041582127,0.0006636208,0.0021403998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049473334,0.00034935283,0.00035113553,0.0010186087,0.00085039105,0.0008073055,0.0011680068,0.0011137595,0.00039430807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003739902,0.00036643265,0.92501086,0.0000798252,0.0000733135,0.00045483708,0.040304385,0.00018238518,0.0062381355,0.0001372861,0.00023081762,0.026547685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000232116,0.0005770027,0.94934964,0.000051147712,0.000054846336,0.00072947907,0.04376017,0.0010090343,0.002993375,0.00029782022,0.0011058075,0.000048414557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017014464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002257148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030948648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004972697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027530038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01557976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083539232","doi":"10.1177/0963662505054560","title":"Book Review: The Genetic Imaginary: DNA in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0350899771419827,"score_gpt":0.27324036364467896,"score_spread":0.23815038650269627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083539232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003435544,0.2690158,0.00041942098,0.37919423,0.20702319,0.00009715697,0.00073278043,0.00012725694,0.14304669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006285147,0.1596473,0.00046129906,0.12304097,0.118417315,0.00010153264,0.0004928848,0.00016361623,0.5913899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895775,0.000121463316,0.000028371736,0.00010143705,0.00066532765,0.00012568138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957918,0.0010421082,0.0000748771,0.00007649006,0.0024839414,0.00053072476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013475843,0.0015222846,0.0014175767,0.0029222465,0.00543805,0.006057177,0.002270686,0.0064109494,0.04386534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055629616,0.00047550653,0.00060763996,0.0044418867,0.0033734706,0.0029158222,0.001046784,0.0053442246,0.0084492015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020397313,0.0000018725625,0.000020058065,0.00003088077,0.0000010599844,0.000009207226,0.000018670515,0.000021439171,0.000009652053,0.0011569058,0.9951207,0.003607642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000441518,0.0000033936658,0.0003609952,0.00017337051,0.0000052730315,0.00003425409,0.0001273929,0.000028755656,0.000012970538,0.0012463075,0.9979931,0.000009818801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68587613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8816252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026762439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026716089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086139813","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414982","title":"The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Cardiff University","keywords":"Drama; Sociology; Science communication; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Focus group; Focus (optics); Human cloning; Public relations; Science education; Pedagogy; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.5671756946719387,"score_gpt":0.44082014414216014,"score_spread":0.1263555505297786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086139813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30800685,0.0053783953,0.02147232,0.010685224,0.0019640555,0.00040519718,0.00056303013,0.0005447596,0.65098023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529923,0.0019671808,0.008056177,0.0012690976,0.0008015426,0.00029652243,0.00029108181,0.00016512256,0.034160934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974497,0.0017139626,0.000050899085,0.00017153182,0.0003306492,0.00028317113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922881,0.0056982604,0.0004677129,0.0007119491,0.00022423419,0.0006097288],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026476684,0.00055737223,0.00024800014,0.0017518472,0.0035601438,0.004647933,0.0011857947,0.0016264275,0.012898113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008129017,0.0002120523,0.00034256815,0.0015654513,0.00585423,0.0026868288,0.005026551,0.0024668598,0.0011473874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005960247,0.00042090032,0.009043028,0.0026234444,0.00007525005,0.0018742378,0.44146028,0.0012012,0.013966899,0.22013919,0.054827634,0.25377193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666258,0.00040889636,0.012209534,0.00078994804,0.000050629555,0.0019123964,0.094039574,0.00088515144,0.004563825,0.010321196,0.8746753,0.00007699263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013711707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027667538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015673566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006509552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043148518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089501922","doi":"10.1177/0963662510384461","title":"Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Newspaper; Public opinion; Political science; Scientific publishing; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.5880613633378229,"score_gpt":0.4714212013915512,"score_spread":0.11664016194627169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089501922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985733,0.00016739243,0.00003473081,0.00010847309,0.0000034940851,0.000006772453,0.000179616,0.0000024216881,0.0009237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928385,0.00027344114,0.00006248076,0.000044025397,0.00001270363,0.000009670599,0.00013417343,0.0000024401393,0.00017713966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964457,0.0014695338,0.0005793203,0.00020255442,0.0009163321,0.00038661857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937575,0.020488821,0.030753374,0.0017222969,0.0059608617,0.003499564],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004707539,0.00014421558,0.00045499226,0.0036728545,0.0010015421,0.0018400074,0.0004508873,0.0005313478,0.0019177938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021096399,0.00027835323,0.00022843956,0.006666443,0.0009374597,0.001643734,0.0011073448,0.0005410487,0.0003818306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067715206,0.00008062188,0.9760695,0.00008570672,0.00003327947,0.00011739077,0.013883668,0.000049405287,0.00021333671,0.000094694784,0.00042698425,0.008877699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060674242,0.00010777992,0.9631341,0.000050607436,0.000013182991,0.00018369264,0.034719463,0.00013127759,0.00014431393,0.000030946117,0.0014644717,0.000014094569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007919226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071262685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010457664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011280209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024896204},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2091751676","doi":"10.1177/0963662510364201","title":"Truth and opinion in climate change discourse: The Gore–Hansen disagreement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Representation (politics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Pragmatic theory of truth; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.679273851901187,"score_gpt":0.48942157437090733,"score_spread":0.18985227753027972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091751676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09954206,0.015389829,0.021993862,0.5464524,0.0026022126,0.000039353174,0.000099671226,0.000067051005,0.31381363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840949,0.0017806445,0.0012210154,0.00904902,0.00089759356,0.000021443919,0.000020261785,0.000036008,0.00287912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666071,0.024358148,0.0009640182,0.0021754724,0.0044028163,0.0014924436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94148314,0.05073042,0.0028080924,0.0018407545,0.0022889078,0.0008487658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023502963,0.00044437993,0.00078303984,0.0025985169,0.014045364,0.013884629,0.0018745468,0.012204113,0.0051496173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063877344,0.00054153317,0.0004746321,0.002567294,0.058641538,0.025459226,0.009023609,0.012491699,0.00056894537],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036579146,0.000011924149,0.00037552236,0.00008245659,0.000008899946,0.00031658137,0.096702054,0.00013550009,0.00014436265,0.88991034,0.0061535705,0.006122286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051987416,0.000039526785,0.0011090008,0.0004990223,0.00002437791,0.00040196464,0.07493903,0.0009959257,0.00056978856,0.73181295,0.18948093,0.00007540407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005732388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030361833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98595464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066713295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024432647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12429702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097298859","doi":"10.1177/0963662509351638","title":"Extending the reach of research as a public good: Moving beyond the paradox of “zero-sum language games”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Zero-sum game; Sociology; Zero (linguistics); Public relations; Game theory; Intersection (aeronautics); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Linguistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.12754353179383815,"score_gpt":0.36159367717987445,"score_spread":0.2340501453860363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097298859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06536081,0.0074529937,0.17729634,0.29552734,0.0009929504,0.00028604633,0.000054772976,0.0003158623,0.45271286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96598923,0.0013878944,0.017751617,0.008550426,0.00034342968,0.00032745217,0.000021107622,0.00013308394,0.0054958155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90446,0.07492977,0.0021118415,0.00432268,0.010406845,0.0037688038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8100983,0.15087083,0.0073749796,0.014422003,0.007211274,0.0100227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09810957,0.0011228075,0.001688203,0.0058388337,0.01586149,0.047359027,0.004585398,0.013606193,0.0046812133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11818936,0.0011989886,0.0013048048,0.00340302,0.12507609,0.05723385,0.047546826,0.015249839,0.0009309235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012557539,0.0000148775725,0.00015970161,0.000056219014,0.000009946363,0.000036535133,0.016697463,0.0002695447,0.00013604983,0.976393,0.0005785807,0.005635579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015709062,0.000013453508,0.000073172916,0.000111674155,0.0000063599464,0.00002111244,0.005672975,0.000419436,0.00012791972,0.9728169,0.02070637,0.000014918484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005104824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014559723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028012538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5188592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098428202","doi":"10.1177/0963662510389977","title":"Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Credibility; Assertion; Situated; Social media; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Relevance (law); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Science communication; Social science; Media studies; Geography; Science education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.2064546613661575,"score_gpt":0.35814849699906937,"score_spread":0.15169383563291186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098428202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81268203,0.0070195594,0.002762544,0.018076489,0.00027121938,0.000056846122,0.00024419677,0.000020746731,0.15886632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435943,0.0024975121,0.00045186983,0.00051620416,0.00022045175,0.000023155015,0.00004425899,0.000013597314,0.0018736112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965237,0.0019418631,0.00012040422,0.00027671573,0.00068586366,0.00045132838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746293,0.019726017,0.0031183981,0.00052200264,0.0013703742,0.0006339181],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035614702,0.00026971666,0.00032444112,0.007038189,0.0064917654,0.015371127,0.0007921635,0.002007949,0.0039889975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02009185,0.0002840542,0.00021620777,0.0076379585,0.012044595,0.009648039,0.0045696045,0.0018118669,0.0002965508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029676114,0.00006268782,0.05419208,0.00049633556,0.0000530226,0.0022761424,0.78709334,0.00021957123,0.0013882014,0.085695416,0.002338423,0.065887995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035660105,0.00007790636,0.07495545,0.000762778,0.00009539463,0.00088422,0.7959811,0.00054077065,0.001110967,0.026050616,0.09944033,0.00006483622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030163687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036179107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004612102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031687208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05997622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103628484","doi":"10.1177/0963662506059259","title":"When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Alzheimer's disease research and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Perspective (graphical); Disease; Reflexivity; Population; Family aggregation; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Biology; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Pathology; Gene","score_opus":0.12665422455900074,"score_gpt":0.3536581988586312,"score_spread":0.22700397429963046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103628484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045308266,0.03536136,0.019831331,0.84198666,0.0074582784,0.00005572307,0.00010323211,0.00008428188,0.049810775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83613724,0.044400226,0.0097578615,0.09657901,0.0072315517,0.00017462444,0.000108917084,0.00018258559,0.00542801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96825224,0.027388271,0.00058355497,0.001211079,0.001333571,0.0012312434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938203,0.054437,0.0021618272,0.0013167243,0.0022619162,0.0016195347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03596892,0.0013427077,0.0016399365,0.0045205904,0.015257467,0.014777026,0.0035441972,0.013841624,0.0028493053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051387217,0.001064156,0.0008549885,0.002430447,0.097789675,0.03244936,0.011269122,0.016222935,0.00058482686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006999602,0.0000293936,0.0025776143,0.0004960633,0.00007196499,0.0031662937,0.7373318,0.000300643,0.00029740308,0.22387078,0.01584247,0.015945544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021407497,0.00007076102,0.0013517046,0.0011800575,0.000062173574,0.0018615819,0.56769127,0.0001997646,0.00024838804,0.30000085,0.12725496,0.00005713704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010181535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018769797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009636072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011650156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19022405},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2110560640","doi":"10.1177/0963662510362834","title":"Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Demographics; Agriculture; Genetically modified maize; Biotechnology; Biology; Genetically modified crops; Sociology; Demography; Transgene","score_opus":0.3381699158898848,"score_gpt":0.42899045343867487,"score_spread":0.09082053754879005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110560640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877187,0.0006532142,0.0010996776,0.0034584305,0.00004917657,0.000023293012,0.00003620911,0.000008349439,0.006952869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967822,0.00070552685,0.00052570464,0.0011630562,0.000049984727,0.0000266836,0.000025011666,0.000005677849,0.0007160941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871738,0.009722356,0.00037319015,0.00045635866,0.0018063068,0.00046804428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9250289,0.04712787,0.017525492,0.0023530028,0.003103228,0.004861365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018950248,0.0002103852,0.00025608088,0.00088059745,0.0015662654,0.0025474122,0.00040749347,0.0013841445,0.0031922448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026183473,0.00025184866,0.00029955464,0.00040719798,0.003843639,0.0018491098,0.001987937,0.0020138437,0.00024822986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094563566,0.00079627923,0.5163339,0.0008321693,0.0002941772,0.0022050922,0.38445553,0.00041903663,0.015595983,0.007786878,0.0034651128,0.066870235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001276067,0.0033314892,0.45167246,0.0013364073,0.00025368162,0.0049963356,0.4415783,0.0010704083,0.0056678453,0.00881724,0.08082073,0.00032759065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015287669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016427477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007789725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011392549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10021973},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2112267120","doi":"10.1177/0963662512445011","title":"Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Prerogative; Synthetic biology; Opposition (politics); Value (mathematics); Perception; Epistemology; Contextualization; Sociology; Biology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Genetics; Computer science; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.6569746554918238,"score_gpt":0.4649709770504388,"score_spread":0.19200367844138494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112267120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98983276,0.00025390583,0.00043448174,0.002469871,0.000018476983,0.0000081976505,0.000026989073,0.000002339467,0.006952911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.00007872892,0.000035790563,0.00013137922,0.000009716251,0.0000014807567,0.000007766785,9.2702186e-7,0.0001353879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957146,0.0026297844,0.00020417117,0.00023275778,0.0007925558,0.00042610936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942161,0.02973709,0.021151377,0.002130152,0.0032863216,0.0015339867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069593918,0.00014487993,0.00022642034,0.0008757397,0.0009368762,0.002226316,0.00035778526,0.0010937357,0.004072106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028354496,0.000204606,0.00020186229,0.0006402575,0.0038926124,0.0014468107,0.0010673932,0.0022992983,0.0003154736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005436678,0.00043180666,0.87901896,0.00022717364,0.00015604513,0.0007418211,0.0587503,0.00029494942,0.0019075366,0.017839508,0.001419792,0.038668543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000545582,0.00039440236,0.8971988,0.00027790538,0.000085893094,0.00058828923,0.08087609,0.0011637767,0.0010892899,0.007676112,0.010527362,0.000067573266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030979824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002642687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99906313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007090181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049392245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036805212},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2118284749","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104721","title":"Ethnocultural community leaders’ views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Biobank; Public relations; Qualitative research; Population; Political science; Parliament; General partnership; Empirical research; Sociology; Social science; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.9682858363290403,"score_gpt":0.7231313609780634,"score_spread":0.2451544753509769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118284749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99644226,0.00021285526,0.0006567674,0.0010541573,0.000022558355,0.00016910218,0.000027173359,0.0000049959413,0.0014101468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975083,0.0002975701,0.00047211943,0.0006271959,0.000013223313,0.00022252204,0.000021005719,0.000005936417,0.0008321213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98221856,0.013634957,0.0003435714,0.0005627068,0.00096363405,0.0022766558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719244,0.01918201,0.0016664016,0.0004942961,0.0021337233,0.0045991107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021323653,0.00046324916,0.00071319187,0.0019352518,0.014022483,0.0036709898,0.0013093662,0.0015558448,0.002489468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01934144,0.0006069845,0.00030587046,0.0015119553,0.00972837,0.0032391546,0.0052714655,0.0022407135,0.0002316546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002636277,0.00009676753,0.003981155,0.00004917934,0.0000026138523,0.0004668131,0.9922666,0.000017246606,0.00044161754,0.0004197213,0.00019035014,0.0020415748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053263784,0.000057106085,0.0010952109,0.000046786947,0.0000023371063,0.00011797793,0.9965475,0.000040607047,0.00011485963,0.00013165396,0.0018334416,0.000007321494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023442492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028539887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98597753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004908819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007859016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11277157},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2119874225","doi":"10.1177/0963662511420511","title":"Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Structural equation modeling; Public trust; Set (abstract data type); Science communication; Psychology; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Science education; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.7019911411933458,"score_gpt":0.46281155206154523,"score_spread":0.2391795891318006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119874225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99295044,0.0004739315,0.0016209437,0.0016329443,0.00002060884,0.000031008512,0.0002372433,0.0000048150637,0.0030280603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994624,0.00008276719,0.00018138216,0.000068542045,0.0000074171967,0.000009870756,0.00006338468,0.0000011507854,0.00012317488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928848,0.0036825743,0.0006195926,0.00068300735,0.0013134236,0.00081654824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8340841,0.108054124,0.0399104,0.007963364,0.0063432218,0.0036447798],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010848468,0.00016914055,0.00051763747,0.0011701571,0.0009795037,0.0017350577,0.00054256985,0.00093480095,0.0030142514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09418786,0.00037353951,0.0005481777,0.0019764917,0.0030396292,0.0012064409,0.0011643675,0.0016829723,0.00014535926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006559689,0.000046206856,0.9936114,0.000028667597,0.00011932503,0.0000657272,0.0012474497,0.00018648716,0.000032074666,0.00096262415,0.00014751054,0.0034869292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028976234,0.00009499647,0.9868194,0.00009180761,0.00018448695,0.00020623094,0.002988538,0.0029930617,0.00012659485,0.0054709534,0.00096757227,0.0000273175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09848975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09961945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025697728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003056715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19583297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127448545","doi":"10.1177/0963662509102690","title":"The gap between scientists and journalists: the case of mercury science in Québec’s press","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Media studies; Journalism; Science communication; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.6052165534473128,"score_gpt":0.4691542361943893,"score_spread":0.13606231725292356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127448545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78726995,0.0022054894,0.0009484082,0.1084479,0.00044238043,0.000117406154,0.000142417,0.00005408097,0.100371905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98353195,0.0003240711,0.00023352518,0.005771145,0.00008492152,0.000036918405,0.000026108111,0.00001688619,0.009974656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855167,0.0061622253,0.0002652989,0.00077641837,0.0024992167,0.0047801146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454967,0.03471159,0.0035914169,0.0008607665,0.008071588,0.0072678737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008898947,0.00040609084,0.00057668623,0.002686682,0.06548575,0.018382622,0.0031453245,0.008830031,0.009963047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02688285,0.00055916625,0.00043740467,0.0056748996,0.019267699,0.0050987974,0.0049297237,0.0058091595,0.00064839673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001349042,0.00009579963,0.018796159,0.0001590218,0.00004086453,0.020845745,0.9082697,0.00032062797,0.001161696,0.023283541,0.018051138,0.008840787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035376,0.000034420253,0.013484134,0.00017443311,0.000024162906,0.00069604267,0.89113486,0.00045035634,0.00025884513,0.0019822805,0.09166506,0.00006006521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95739645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9345142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107618436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06451947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78083},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2129601625","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306","title":"Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: a comparative study of four Anglo-American nations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sociology of scientific knowledge; General Social Survey; Public opinion; Political science; Variation (astronomy); Scientific evidence; Social science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1476767092510554,"score_gpt":0.347158489290871,"score_spread":0.19948178003981562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129601625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998982,0.00012400486,0.000016941383,0.000037431888,0.0000029722294,0.0000023399014,0.000025722367,2.9868357e-7,0.0008082117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989893,0.00027088114,0.000047740872,0.000082773935,0.0000038143824,0.0000078534995,0.00006314995,0.0000013696974,0.00053317874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995828,0.00017117495,0.00001863569,0.00004812691,0.000058874226,0.00012046544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986858,0.00045366274,0.00030115503,0.000049105176,0.00024593133,0.00026426304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011059701,0.0001538099,0.00027858076,0.0010785285,0.001566348,0.0008852299,0.0001909595,0.00030340874,0.00216388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021684254,0.00016720143,0.00020653312,0.0013040856,0.0008770834,0.0007648734,0.0006718295,0.00046354532,0.00024847992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030313418,0.0003343175,0.8806747,0.000053442207,0.0000617745,0.00037665805,0.10333747,0.000024696217,0.0007292284,0.00067286106,0.0005350363,0.012896701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007840355,0.00017409898,0.9287832,0.00003923121,0.000024982364,0.00017549994,0.06846947,0.000049735558,0.000093757204,0.000102741134,0.0020701373,0.000009358457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03802842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084636696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99843365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006390413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041659773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075614154},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2129744414","doi":"10.1177/0963662506053738","title":"Moral presentation of genetics-based narratives for public understanding of genetic science and its implications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Harm; Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Genetic testing; Medical genetics; Psychology; Obligation; Bioethics; Political science; Genetics; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Biology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.1399270792147459,"score_gpt":0.3462521193223407,"score_spread":0.20632504010759478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129744414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065724276,0.0044308295,0.05413691,0.5730378,0.01036531,0.000436559,0.00011764116,0.0004148489,0.2913358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91172326,0.0019185506,0.015337351,0.03651185,0.0015399074,0.00051170203,0.0000847815,0.000225042,0.032147657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93158436,0.0583819,0.0012389718,0.0008230474,0.0061555286,0.0018161407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9202321,0.053307053,0.0065722815,0.004271729,0.008252903,0.0073639126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03838263,0.0010652321,0.00073372945,0.0015170628,0.016911814,0.014586622,0.0023487392,0.011215371,0.010223625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104926676,0.00052068103,0.00095485314,0.000889656,0.03465953,0.016328575,0.016718281,0.015437889,0.0019267118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006551437,0.00007719752,0.0005338778,0.00021773655,0.000013584405,0.0023044602,0.3535687,0.00029985726,0.00085792114,0.58197945,0.04778772,0.012293874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046475663,0.00005790005,0.000365107,0.00066255266,0.000017146755,0.002226064,0.22383098,0.0008418493,0.0012067022,0.26308557,0.50757337,0.00008628234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001250581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009727223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009580981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009257245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20298922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130426866","doi":"10.1177/0963662510393083","title":"Frames, claims and audiences: Construction of food allergies in the Canadian media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; McMaster University","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Framing (construction); Allergy; Environmental health; Mass media; Public health; Food safety; Perception; Food allergy; Medicine; Psychology; Business; Advertising; Geography; Immunology","score_opus":0.15202335343811485,"score_gpt":0.21807949395867754,"score_spread":0.06605614052056269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130426866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7274967,0.0029617175,0.001766674,0.018786546,0.00027618028,0.00014228662,0.00064711086,0.00007869895,0.24784406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922735,0.0010289352,0.000502728,0.00028289243,0.00006596804,0.000020674115,0.00011580478,0.000023552155,0.0056859325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202174,0.0025914449,0.0001942773,0.0006346601,0.0033604251,0.001197445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97963953,0.010264639,0.0027885102,0.0008573727,0.004833849,0.0016160992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583797,0.00088384096,0.00040428794,0.012440564,0.019933358,0.018679123,0.0018499583,0.0021515328,0.006591501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023986164,0.00063395867,0.00051327894,0.0078034117,0.014590077,0.0052041467,0.0072494405,0.0024884003,0.00034591972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009253311,0.000038478127,0.027561828,0.00015481388,0.000025589166,0.00083309156,0.91047907,0.00018983286,0.0009574552,0.032585144,0.0035784002,0.023503808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019345853,0.000044293276,0.086380705,0.0005404629,0.000102448925,0.00026605203,0.7688835,0.0011098434,0.0008129764,0.006561213,0.13513355,0.00014555374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9137957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9031809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08620429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085801974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034861363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6225398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133789319","doi":"10.1177/0963662512472160","title":"From ‘trust us’ to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Publics; Deliberation; Corporate governance; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Political science; Public awareness of science; Public participation; Sociology; Science communication; Business; Science education; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.5857273778470713,"score_gpt":0.4660049300630402,"score_spread":0.11972244778403107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133789319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03544592,0.0113322465,0.151922,0.50652593,0.002347167,0.0003808277,0.00005834387,0.00030498687,0.2916826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96369,0.0023264673,0.009579555,0.015173113,0.000817591,0.00038453302,0.000029573974,0.00012755206,0.007871606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.78229827,0.1851391,0.0035601815,0.008134768,0.012588189,0.0082794335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8477766,0.11478637,0.009385588,0.01387416,0.00678053,0.0073967795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13754705,0.0011782186,0.0013898549,0.004319765,0.015925271,0.028419793,0.003326232,0.016521923,0.0074915853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13123347,0.0011767588,0.0014047065,0.0036669318,0.14255665,0.0360084,0.031769026,0.017440377,0.0009743877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024277095,0.000028977454,0.0004543048,0.000116439514,0.000022155917,0.00009523477,0.022411821,0.0004955298,0.00009056669,0.96584445,0.0026305532,0.007785686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025768757,0.00003863935,0.00023156303,0.00025434184,0.000010515216,0.000052770883,0.009817031,0.00045864694,0.00014619126,0.93676263,0.05217372,0.000028168208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00790532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004756218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017845947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029094871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.727427},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2133826347","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/11/1/302","title":"Scientific literacy as collective praxis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Praxis; Situated; Literacy; Ethnography; Sociology; Collective intelligence; Event (particle physics); Information literacy; Epistemology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.21158686980101016,"score_gpt":0.4075914366067257,"score_spread":0.19600456680571554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133826347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28707114,0.003067164,0.08222342,0.026963226,0.00034325194,0.00016414654,0.000060277504,0.00020989997,0.59989744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98369503,0.00052608945,0.007711474,0.0005851794,0.00014353463,0.00011000733,0.000027014406,0.000027611079,0.0071740393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494475,0.0028008276,0.00021851498,0.0007789925,0.00083008053,0.0004268331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901579,0.0048695477,0.0018524772,0.0016080379,0.0007513692,0.0007605683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006074222,0.0003090768,0.00032264684,0.0019979065,0.0033155838,0.0075283702,0.0007902873,0.0017859294,0.0034865441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116503695,0.00024072664,0.00031908066,0.0009256428,0.038538415,0.008181434,0.008656032,0.0026007686,0.0004199122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019275094,0.000080349666,0.0042341948,0.0001836982,0.000016914188,0.00022947518,0.10287786,0.00040996718,0.0013468253,0.86173856,0.0009406037,0.027922304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029274759,0.00015659485,0.006645108,0.0003800877,0.000025926478,0.0005825161,0.03941177,0.0010045164,0.0011060423,0.8586634,0.09195165,0.00004309139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007441431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006382926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99668443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001705018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021021534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032123923},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2137512204","doi":"10.1177/0963662513512441","title":"<i>Nacherzeugung, Nachverstehen</i>: A phenomenological perspective on how public understanding of science changes by engaging with online media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Scientific literacy; Sociology; History and philosophy of science; History of science; Science communication; Science education; Social science; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.19069262310952687,"score_gpt":0.31608265246383516,"score_spread":0.1253900293543083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137512204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78117007,0.0023532498,0.029741298,0.0405879,0.0004826184,0.00018953532,0.00017732938,0.00016027495,0.14513767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938496,0.0006003707,0.0011890136,0.0011391416,0.00005765007,0.00006560729,0.000027591674,0.00004538533,0.0030256528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915063,0.0067895437,0.00019680991,0.0004050701,0.00049511733,0.0006071493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904184,0.0074990513,0.0008429166,0.00058193237,0.000297934,0.00035988083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006949233,0.00050120865,0.0004412407,0.0018666087,0.011915729,0.012146798,0.001774149,0.0052085426,0.002358572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011530601,0.0004442093,0.00061122817,0.0018894695,0.059371945,0.021838984,0.0070965053,0.006583547,0.00035283228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015282714,0.00001792865,0.0005868101,0.000042525615,0.0000024923427,0.00036037128,0.92818445,0.000059665068,0.00034872082,0.068779245,0.0005183388,0.0010842346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050998024,0.000021007065,0.0006326563,0.00013548024,0.000005288501,0.00036844102,0.9573561,0.0001551308,0.00040010072,0.01457173,0.026325878,0.000023034549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049490165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035766573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98808426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044339546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022001048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03675151},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2146122845","doi":"10.1177/0963662513481294","title":"A surfeit of science: The “CSI effect” and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Appropriation; Hegemony; Contradiction; Sociology; Science communication; Social media; Reality tv; Public opinion; Mass media; Public awareness of science; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Science education; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.3991288809330105,"score_gpt":0.38424801767111966,"score_spread":0.014880863261890864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146122845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49416757,0.0032150557,0.015833262,0.056534953,0.00051286956,0.000049888135,0.000105044135,0.00016230872,0.42941913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959636,0.0005339235,0.0005725375,0.0012112912,0.0001745295,0.000015384212,0.000013528892,0.000039235914,0.00147601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889092,0.0070161177,0.00028131658,0.0007150132,0.0024947908,0.0005836091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523639,0.03881788,0.0039272723,0.0025168466,0.0018240047,0.000550125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009180216,0.0005357624,0.00036641644,0.0048172013,0.007894057,0.012317609,0.0009199738,0.0029704748,0.0048275795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02462909,0.00048199005,0.00046152514,0.0028459744,0.048395567,0.014929269,0.011123602,0.005257427,0.000317765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012461616,0.000051840747,0.008275332,0.00021241332,0.00003296383,0.0003667241,0.3410064,0.0002476462,0.0017368343,0.61977255,0.0031426307,0.02502997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008985033,0.00019597213,0.013872066,0.0010055192,0.0001406938,0.0009976523,0.5215934,0.0015017675,0.007173523,0.28294078,0.17035438,0.0001345001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004255355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030733733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99210596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054025524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029670761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04855019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147817416","doi":"10.1177/0963662507077509","title":"The emergence of a community mapping network: coastal eelgrass mapping in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Victoria University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Outreach; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Citizen science; Wonder; Process (computing); Politics; Ethnography; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.09202029578232994,"score_gpt":0.23054178283587534,"score_spread":0.1385214870535454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147817416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738174,0.00038031375,0.0012409037,0.003073952,0.000018275878,0.00007719972,0.00011006511,0.000027737064,0.02125436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945292,0.00020078545,0.0010919942,0.00013533748,0.0000019709917,0.000025768912,0.000065370565,0.000009240588,0.0039403937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982318,0.0006431379,0.000042544485,0.00025111175,0.0003109751,0.00052036624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993911,0.0019804582,0.0005447328,0.0003198592,0.0019038515,0.001340015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023143697,0.0001498494,0.00016495153,0.0018349409,0.010777062,0.00364291,0.0014819807,0.00077515864,0.0024206846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006823558,0.0002886543,0.00007412287,0.0030493217,0.0050210594,0.001776756,0.0038114926,0.0009922897,0.00012904353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100352096,0.00009935649,0.25457695,0.00017676638,0.000018552191,0.0032105597,0.58863026,0.0011241651,0.0023536643,0.014946022,0.0072965394,0.12746683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008478305,0.000052159674,0.23947087,0.00022625693,0.000015580314,0.00035314972,0.67664903,0.0020146836,0.00048684535,0.001564865,0.07911415,0.000043906395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9486697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051330328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028530985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035262406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20700777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147876970","doi":"10.1177/0963662506063017","title":"Use of the deficit model in a shared culture of argumentation: the case of foot and mouth science","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of East Anglia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Public awareness of science; Sociology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Politics; Criticism; Science communication; Relation (database); Philosophy of science; Social science; Political science; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.1653316454734304,"score_gpt":0.2743574182359106,"score_spread":0.10902577276248018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147876970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58508956,0.0022328305,0.07359005,0.14511546,0.0005110042,0.00024111143,0.000075081276,0.00013448184,0.19301051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960263,0.00014523363,0.0019863006,0.00082241534,0.00004304909,0.000058272366,0.0000084209905,0.00003022381,0.0008797502],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87834847,0.100529894,0.0029731982,0.0037878593,0.009268576,0.005092025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8833327,0.09440582,0.008705804,0.005980719,0.004823623,0.0027512447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056485582,0.0011528751,0.0013811279,0.007083619,0.032315467,0.024303885,0.004973932,0.016339047,0.00345135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092522256,0.001177136,0.0012747766,0.003642235,0.09026701,0.039365165,0.02690611,0.012617966,0.000387661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042747793,0.000032443397,0.0013072955,0.000119361175,0.000018743787,0.0013735761,0.60537213,0.0002555994,0.00031314814,0.38729018,0.00079456693,0.0030802374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009322596,0.000064195956,0.0007260903,0.00048373546,0.000047933354,0.001660558,0.5421522,0.0037709645,0.0006411657,0.4035228,0.046753354,0.00008374128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010283544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004993333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020025117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108189285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29872787},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2153995192","doi":"10.1177/0963662506052889","title":"The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: competing voices, contrasting frames","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Exploratory analysis; Political science; Democracy; Cluster (spacecraft); Descriptive statistics; Pragmatism; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Data science","score_opus":0.06979643153437269,"score_gpt":0.26027385716915075,"score_spread":0.19047742563477804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153995192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603636,0.00071611855,0.00033164106,0.00811611,0.000083010185,0.00006313552,0.00036756363,0.000009379722,0.029949531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769187,0.00027070017,0.00011276125,0.000640048,0.000020006271,0.00001876775,0.00011008551,0.00000582909,0.0011300019],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004316,0.002328155,0.00020075549,0.00051739614,0.0042727846,0.0026377917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97871906,0.0074451757,0.0020361908,0.00033006573,0.008973631,0.00249587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008539303,0.00032515518,0.0005866694,0.0059305043,0.017067414,0.010389751,0.001430786,0.0014541224,0.0018853722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021383207,0.00032974692,0.0004678763,0.008577011,0.008816074,0.0022795363,0.0036991092,0.0025316412,0.000110785775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048555082,0.00012555871,0.17867775,0.00020081397,0.0000982469,0.0007666841,0.7535899,0.00047045,0.0011716665,0.02663112,0.008877451,0.028904825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019469573,0.000045226,0.15689419,0.00014477897,0.000036556354,0.000058427526,0.8201049,0.00062558206,0.0003034699,0.0010273884,0.020649845,0.00009015063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104992114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104992114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07162552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76177466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156568070","doi":"10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306","title":"Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ignorance; Functional illiteracy; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Climate change; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Public awareness of science; Scientific literacy; Social science; Science communication; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Science education; Ecology","score_opus":0.5924144285400437,"score_gpt":0.4405157376015892,"score_spread":0.15189869093845448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156568070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62945753,0.013280002,0.00419994,0.15725297,0.00044167947,0.00001607119,0.0000393904,0.000015517542,0.19529694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641573,0.001264396,0.00009858876,0.0014046947,0.00009650943,0.000003932231,0.000003123016,0.0000035625003,0.00070947834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733424,0.0016742367,0.00007203106,0.00013675404,0.0004315912,0.0003511202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913628,0.0059359297,0.0015100747,0.00027670714,0.0005129533,0.0004015727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037524519,0.00022892146,0.00032329993,0.0013853862,0.0034494742,0.00622651,0.00064117217,0.00295683,0.002708114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008757785,0.00018680857,0.00021248824,0.0015097248,0.023921518,0.007934604,0.004069811,0.0030913432,0.00014102744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009847816,0.000104702965,0.011922816,0.00023674867,0.00003768944,0.0006622223,0.2727874,0.00029462474,0.0006226825,0.6866812,0.0033670296,0.023184445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046277677,0.0001603713,0.026069399,0.0006883708,0.00007081621,0.0006539606,0.43711814,0.0010316831,0.0009773948,0.4480496,0.08503861,0.000095294636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004385729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003623997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00622651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022857296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014823652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019845128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157148197","doi":"10.1177/0963662509104722","title":"Proceeding carefully: Assisted human reproduction policy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Leverhulme Trust; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Reproduction; Jurisdiction; Elite; Political science; Federalist; Policy development; Human reproduction; State (computer science); Public administration; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.08371168763202602,"score_gpt":0.2941998160954693,"score_spread":0.21048812846344328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157148197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17742282,0.020496126,0.0020341333,0.48915464,0.0011491505,0.00029668512,0.00058402464,0.00008968316,0.30877268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8861595,0.00823023,0.0021738587,0.04224584,0.00017864822,0.00008512477,0.0001672898,0.00003820338,0.06072131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98163027,0.002893969,0.0004778121,0.0010320377,0.0065858415,0.0073800636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97507024,0.0076495344,0.0011970204,0.00048132552,0.008618412,0.006983454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011136659,0.0003002898,0.0005239897,0.002647277,0.048362225,0.013368696,0.0032387697,0.0076029543,0.006770883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023523282,0.0005806745,0.00048375636,0.0062826253,0.01689907,0.002737942,0.0046675587,0.0068613566,0.00031539422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009016392,0.00008097826,0.009622898,0.0003741952,0.000034233788,0.0015524654,0.05663733,0.0013401052,0.00090022804,0.816078,0.06715605,0.046133276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000836336,0.00008709789,0.030415524,0.0008063713,0.0000644684,0.00029597164,0.07823661,0.0015047739,0.0008827046,0.039091367,0.84830105,0.0002304916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99722123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95163774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32868662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6414485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77862835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158238213","doi":"10.1177/0963662510361655","title":"Can the governance of a population genetic data bank effect recruitment? Evidence from the public consultation of Generation Scotland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Corporate governance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Good governance; Public economics; Business; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Demography; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.3178384925395448,"score_gpt":0.39872020931873864,"score_spread":0.08088171677919381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158238213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454517,0.00078067847,0.002284147,0.02819599,0.00007680633,0.000436476,0.00023012332,0.000026970198,0.022517165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766564,0.0001619726,0.00030891458,0.0013871333,0.00001967193,0.00009520616,0.000024926512,0.0000053527297,0.0003311825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8277073,0.15262526,0.0029760862,0.0024247603,0.0067784074,0.007488294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6957829,0.23361921,0.04040544,0.012481826,0.009062563,0.008648032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.106909655,0.0002333727,0.00036262794,0.001090457,0.0044782967,0.0044891327,0.0015877427,0.0019206217,0.005993346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22485098,0.0004099063,0.00048110733,0.0014943726,0.0065726535,0.0027461722,0.005443149,0.0012737735,0.00045229946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012838107,0.0006809326,0.67992073,0.0007772128,0.00017846032,0.0019304777,0.19879001,0.00048501894,0.000656801,0.023970028,0.009506975,0.08181948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006120942,0.00091724546,0.79362833,0.0015729447,0.00018815075,0.000613658,0.14988564,0.002032594,0.0006963208,0.011140119,0.038576163,0.00013668196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08281257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091846205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073625282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014059311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56539905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163499486","doi":"10.1177/0963662514528439","title":"Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Comprehension; Informed consent; Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Psychology; Principal (computer security); Research ethics; Medical education; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Pathology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7901716714040768,"score_gpt":0.6243422349910017,"score_spread":0.16582943641307513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163499486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5837761,0.006004047,0.22065012,0.13223483,0.0019149705,0.013135086,0.0006343132,0.0005749408,0.041075625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93739206,0.0012836289,0.035176188,0.0114751095,0.00023619716,0.009825788,0.00016106539,0.00019648323,0.0042534587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.28503442,0.63684374,0.036202464,0.0075229118,0.028567202,0.0058292556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18779843,0.7268145,0.044771086,0.0199618,0.018200416,0.0024538434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35610232,0.0012857273,0.0015640327,0.0036089593,0.010695786,0.009725403,0.0042728516,0.0065231733,0.0076177167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5286626,0.002008487,0.00082500756,0.0028051243,0.032559946,0.013303787,0.016922336,0.0094876755,0.0014168479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019906866,0.000046396504,0.0020055317,0.0010652132,0.000018463264,0.0015838305,0.9504643,0.0001357204,0.0020435227,0.026489727,0.0029583063,0.012989893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002122187,0.00037984023,0.0040520714,0.009458281,0.00008162059,0.0048214993,0.7889016,0.0026649064,0.0065132002,0.07146557,0.11114351,0.00030565643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037162916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032478664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012454632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025377177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7940405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167322003","doi":"10.1177/0963662511414983","title":"Working the fringes: The role of letters to the editor in advancing non-standard media narratives about climate change","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Narrative; Skepticism; Newspaper; Normative; Climate change; Media studies; Subject (documents); Political science; Neutrality; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Literature; Art; Computer science; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.413333968661421,"score_gpt":0.3835932143465601,"score_spread":0.02974075431486095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167322003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24274306,0.00922303,0.005022864,0.47692868,0.012059374,0.00016066336,0.0001760008,0.0002768986,0.25340945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529389,0.0019261893,0.0022324228,0.020389881,0.003901815,0.00006670608,0.000031441006,0.00013483624,0.018377746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769398,0.013414922,0.00090939726,0.0011782192,0.004695242,0.0028624078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76851153,0.17532322,0.01764139,0.004636003,0.021760216,0.012127594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029535275,0.0004980849,0.00046123264,0.00260062,0.029827993,0.030195428,0.0019725037,0.006060572,0.004705685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1467262,0.0006020648,0.00030510683,0.0024240515,0.021480305,0.012311955,0.008002498,0.006899537,0.0012445486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004980994,0.000108537635,0.00893391,0.00083646725,0.000036313177,0.0031725005,0.64863294,0.0002723144,0.0025589028,0.14479303,0.09707467,0.093082346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050558072,0.00011781839,0.008467543,0.00080414803,0.000047266592,0.000440675,0.35550466,0.00032914974,0.0023329041,0.027842753,0.60393995,0.0001225434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0571631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08987501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018790267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03289537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15619934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317982304","doi":"10.1177/0963662514545014","title":"Assessing the quality of a deliberative democracy mini-public event about advanced biofuel production and development in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Quality (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Politics; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Democracy; Public participation; Research council; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.10341732006616995,"score_gpt":0.35802912950323085,"score_spread":0.2546118094370609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317982304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610821,0.00018549505,0.001519945,0.0026691107,0.000049956372,0.0004738508,0.0006094868,0.000059011996,0.03335108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439466,0.000105174324,0.0012747273,0.00016401564,0.000007028616,0.00012281486,0.000233743,0.000011148755,0.0036867326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876889,0.003420274,0.00044903587,0.0007585771,0.004983829,0.002699377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97129405,0.0073641664,0.0027260245,0.0008930681,0.01205531,0.005667425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014626978,0.00031942522,0.0005341374,0.001832288,0.01417587,0.005859836,0.0015541036,0.0011028287,0.003332837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0345625,0.0003462477,0.00041069035,0.0028131895,0.0032394023,0.0016150174,0.004922987,0.0018773145,0.00022993424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027702234,0.0014699188,0.4313239,0.0009736439,0.00034720797,0.0018806017,0.24695222,0.01644702,0.004594031,0.027235512,0.02446645,0.2415393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000962547,0.0005207004,0.6714256,0.00036592045,0.00008652953,0.000070760674,0.23794,0.008328054,0.0037305844,0.003706125,0.07342167,0.00030776398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97473645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99014413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09822957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12700813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127088},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2322230534","doi":"10.1177/0963662512450990","title":"Front page or “buried” beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Newspaper; Media coverage; Opposition (politics); Greenhouse gas; Content analysis; Political science; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Public opinion; Public relations; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Media studies; Climate change; Sociology; Social science; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.4860786367515358,"score_gpt":0.3951380317364512,"score_spread":0.09094060501508461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322230534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6153968,0.006050902,0.0029312002,0.030537393,0.0013580612,0.00008448683,0.003494407,0.00015309226,0.3399937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97019863,0.004602836,0.0011599365,0.003067337,0.000967834,0.00003264565,0.0005897405,0.000101937774,0.019279148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903786,0.00031082306,0.000045328827,0.00006711726,0.00038486757,0.00015389983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928389,0.0038178763,0.0014247014,0.00027667658,0.0013999661,0.00024195161],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013023794,0.0002100082,0.00021695823,0.0026177843,0.0016155619,0.004708819,0.0002504309,0.00061348855,0.016274368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088318465,0.00014223723,0.00014953723,0.0035581938,0.0018508602,0.0031807355,0.00070878497,0.00057031953,0.0018702735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008922037,0.00017301207,0.18230584,0.002429201,0.00020264076,0.0017749496,0.12978934,0.00043754172,0.01979189,0.052693494,0.09692984,0.51258004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024796875,0.00016453683,0.30722478,0.0021432757,0.00029134843,0.00072700775,0.17038786,0.0010782336,0.010583837,0.008670835,0.49861014,0.0000934392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024346046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034776192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014315412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010605459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05444318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400513735","doi":"10.1177/0963662515611823","title":"“It’s natural to look for a source”: A qualitative examination of alternative beliefs about HIV and AIDS in Cape Town, South Africa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Skepticism; Credibility; Cape; Focus group; Experiential learning; Sociology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Power (physics); Natural (archaeology); Trustworthiness; Scientific evidence; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; History; Law; Pedagogy; Family medicine","score_opus":0.37600767917625355,"score_gpt":0.46345095382063156,"score_spread":0.08744327464437801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400513735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915348,0.0006775005,0.00054485275,0.0030919455,0.000035824873,0.00011447931,0.000040007253,0.0000054498896,0.0039551207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965322,0.0007055403,0.00028528707,0.0005384728,0.0000113598835,0.00007898214,0.000014792476,0.000012128868,0.0018210958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913326,0.00625033,0.00025573294,0.00042542405,0.0005479565,0.0011879555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822871,0.014468236,0.0012146044,0.00023959373,0.0005713101,0.0012191617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01110028,0.0008337628,0.00092765753,0.0022664864,0.017423894,0.0051963367,0.0021884025,0.0020668101,0.00463961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022800034,0.0011044644,0.00032790427,0.0017803776,0.019301428,0.0055363774,0.006883732,0.0042257165,0.0002600622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006947095,0.00000747313,0.00074423064,0.00004004936,0.0000014477462,0.00042251224,0.9975719,0.0000059241265,0.0001899761,0.00034018813,0.000064161366,0.0006051966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.312738e-7,0.000008262003,0.00060185074,0.000066893925,0.0000015283694,0.000090843,0.9976041,0.000011353128,0.00005243144,0.00007956755,0.0014786852,0.000003497368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0443453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06267524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0443453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008901956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006804305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08817434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743152103","doi":"10.1177/0963662517725715","title":"Anticipating health innovations in 2030–2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Publics; Public health; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Business; Politics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Nursing","score_opus":0.16375850065465422,"score_gpt":0.3729762413115637,"score_spread":0.20921774065690948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743152103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68279237,0.0019723577,0.034036543,0.17002626,0.00060903287,0.00024474686,0.00007189707,0.00012394227,0.110122964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460983,0.0002985057,0.0018399018,0.0020637575,0.00004065347,0.00006385522,0.000011865353,0.000013352719,0.0010581957],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763496,0.017432021,0.00044247706,0.0011150287,0.0021320032,0.0025288388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97194886,0.01999207,0.0030714348,0.0009849304,0.0019051612,0.0020974209],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040155385,0.0004878499,0.00044454433,0.001339364,0.010169912,0.012630168,0.0017862092,0.008634095,0.003280478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04117585,0.00048885774,0.0008487312,0.0005486034,0.022710146,0.015970148,0.013569775,0.0072759846,0.00043787612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013703846,0.00027549238,0.017823743,0.0002990768,0.000057304118,0.0020030586,0.74163276,0.0012099467,0.0027084958,0.20060495,0.0047656256,0.028482541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002094036,0.00016735961,0.006091704,0.00031864698,0.000028450413,0.0005681141,0.73912114,0.0010998286,0.0019096616,0.16279031,0.08775972,0.00012416395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002950139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029033595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067556994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008707609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2123645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775691914","doi":"10.1177/0963662517746561","title":"The Mid-Victorian period and the Astronomical Register (1863-1886): ‘A medium of communication for amateurs and others’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"History and Developments in Astronomy","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Period (music); Telecommunications; History; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05206521858061487,"score_gpt":0.28022839925439047,"score_spread":0.2281631806737756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775691914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20993625,0.022732845,0.0019848458,0.038048875,0.0018918933,0.00008556489,0.0014762359,0.000064719716,0.7237787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.793211,0.0031838764,0.0006632105,0.002319778,0.00026513712,0.00004150212,0.00019907573,0.00010323579,0.2000132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985732,0.0002698321,0.00006302475,0.00012083517,0.000415641,0.00055753853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985683,0.00033568044,0.00032855893,0.00012735538,0.0003268544,0.0003131838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013293821,0.0001875655,0.00023965373,0.0014023167,0.008559564,0.004939752,0.0010491736,0.0022667472,0.013372111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072528934,0.00034737942,0.00015268839,0.0031845248,0.0073869172,0.0041397493,0.004136311,0.0031718174,0.0013181932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014169827,0.000015017498,0.0035712523,0.000366751,0.0000123966765,0.00090579846,0.3120587,0.00010050481,0.0014238134,0.5702374,0.054866366,0.056300256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003977172,0.000009838245,0.013545107,0.00033391162,0.0000028778145,0.00014639321,0.015478684,0.000033569537,0.00020539471,0.008594957,0.9616235,0.000021799267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4669346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73114014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021753859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019217728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796216221","doi":"10.1177/0963662518761733","title":"Identifying diffusion patterns of research articles on Twitter: A case study of online engagement with open access articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Open science; Social media; Science communication; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Citizen science; Ask price; World Wide Web; Altmetrics; Online community; Public engagement; Data science; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Biology; Science education; Publishing; Business","score_opus":0.50896915729909,"score_gpt":0.49662623253611704,"score_spread":0.01234292476297294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796216221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99491537,0.0000772599,0.0022402601,0.00046578402,0.000007622414,0.00007718722,0.0002654909,0.000024791674,0.0019263396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99030906,0.0001856615,0.0072455276,0.00009755554,0.00002524966,0.00012915225,0.00040708468,0.000036543963,0.0015640991],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970682,0.0014800363,0.0002018005,0.0004018073,0.00054295483,0.0003051607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96605366,0.025547387,0.0035917468,0.0016058567,0.0020494687,0.0011520078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004231453,0.00038424705,0.00045126225,0.003794928,0.002615267,0.0021988216,0.0009094948,0.0017134113,0.0015625487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01971113,0.00033158576,0.0004886667,0.004522181,0.001045995,0.003731254,0.0019330345,0.0010229674,0.0005525774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008167667,0.0018617547,0.61788327,0.0007391648,0.00025352588,0.013043894,0.22274835,0.0032520527,0.02422444,0.008782652,0.0039191456,0.1024749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014442478,0.00092075975,0.53968847,0.00033461393,0.00029439287,0.007772573,0.31734806,0.063271314,0.017774958,0.011104495,0.04103617,0.00030968903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00703724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012797692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010949492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069878256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022378325},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2796249541","doi":"10.1177/0963662518766281","title":"Farmers prevailing perception profiles regarding GM crops: A classification proposal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Genetically modified organism; Perception; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified crops; Variety (cybernetics); Stakeholder; Diversity (politics); Genetically engineered; Biotechnology; Sociology; Biology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.14371476778850525,"score_gpt":0.30283445820276395,"score_spread":0.1591196904142587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796249541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769496,0.0003175136,0.0047220252,0.0024852161,0.000041651616,0.000263341,0.00043167453,0.000031302996,0.014757631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966889,0.00023690316,0.0019562077,0.00012291521,0.000012242334,0.00012322214,0.00025602098,0.000005983355,0.0005975999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997292,0.000712399,0.00036685533,0.0002585747,0.00080521667,0.00056497566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898567,0.0032761889,0.0022287369,0.0005356521,0.0032222064,0.00088048144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005685904,0.00039943904,0.00040526403,0.0030142113,0.0017156451,0.0029072133,0.0008656782,0.00086740305,0.0028718547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01427382,0.00025773843,0.0005675896,0.002254436,0.0018854038,0.0024913172,0.0021731157,0.00081230386,0.0006403591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036695908,0.00018484479,0.67022955,0.0005148145,0.00006104475,0.000778697,0.23793598,0.00023929273,0.008177811,0.012637663,0.0022250349,0.06664819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034203586,0.00044672922,0.4429273,0.0006230695,0.00007252759,0.0010672762,0.52246153,0.002757999,0.001342939,0.0112600755,0.016896578,0.0001097611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008340916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005989873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008340916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016345233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018689024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030070305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885131378","doi":"10.1177/0963662518793204","title":"Book Review: Susanna Priest, Communicating Climate Change: The Path Forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Path (computing); Climate change; Environmental ethics; Telecommunications; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer network; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.565314376449417,"score_gpt":0.4602810698541386,"score_spread":0.10503330659527838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885131378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005108492,0.2681409,0.0002868459,0.36661854,0.35219988,0.000053054395,0.00016471367,0.00007059084,0.012414302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014332802,0.22370602,0.00041239004,0.31312653,0.33841795,0.00014864869,0.00025280676,0.00013584176,0.12236649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966703,0.00065129914,0.00021392731,0.00044951445,0.0018626385,0.00015226245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98086804,0.008588804,0.00085042487,0.0003197328,0.007748632,0.0016243426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003759939,0.001526026,0.0025974507,0.0030902484,0.0019019155,0.0063887653,0.003126771,0.011214103,0.031272426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028954916,0.00085109833,0.0010285891,0.0031617517,0.0027803977,0.0054067643,0.0020755157,0.015190276,0.027840734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036597887,0.000001970031,0.000007863046,0.000119449236,0.000003415035,0.000010312974,0.000008648179,0.00000736256,0.00000767406,0.00024405014,0.99449486,0.0050908024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015470612,0.000007434039,0.00008702565,0.0004725825,0.0000118822345,0.00010396661,0.000038035152,0.000018484458,0.000024580586,0.0007395416,0.99847,0.000010962035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011350467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02546855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031272426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004729287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066664997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10461676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885761036","doi":"10.1177/0963662518791902","title":"Researching multiple publics through latent profile analysis: Similarities and differences in science and technology attitudes in China, Japan, South Korea and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Religiosity; Publics; Structural equation modeling; East Asia; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.44973142730612164,"score_gpt":0.4206395576674103,"score_spread":0.029091869638711354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885761036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.000015028204,0.00013955418,0.00008767165,0.0000013100553,0.000004782564,0.000025549381,9.80955e-7,0.000637879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999721,0.000025192983,0.00006206768,0.000019752955,0.0000014426241,0.0000047612252,0.000049685925,8.414303e-7,0.0001152165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988171,0.00042254772,0.00008435703,0.00011592016,0.0002623351,0.0002979023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945575,0.0014302891,0.0019298567,0.0005468642,0.0007954277,0.00074014463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038980057,0.0001825679,0.00030866454,0.0021160417,0.0019224214,0.0024938993,0.00031543663,0.00040338712,0.0018418904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060642636,0.00021094017,0.0004251009,0.0021053546,0.0011843503,0.002808386,0.0027354443,0.00091313256,0.0001711779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010936634,0.00014343367,0.9428365,0.000020267391,0.00006195939,0.00006840486,0.04273967,0.00012663605,0.000958914,0.0015285359,0.00015798153,0.011248249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000587157,0.00007769037,0.9069406,0.000028535096,0.000026964826,0.000039835733,0.08971902,0.0012363843,0.00032913918,0.00085168617,0.00072755374,0.00001685378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019723004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031575527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014630584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015775175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0392164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899501770","doi":"10.1177/0963662518809804","title":"Do newspapers preferentially cover biomedical studies involving national scientists?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Cover (algebra); Political science; Library science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7927431899398841,"score_gpt":0.51843480275747,"score_spread":0.2743083871824141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899501770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95366967,0.01594146,0.002517685,0.006822611,0.00041130977,0.00022768253,0.003986766,0.000032766326,0.016389994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99069667,0.003513488,0.0014459344,0.001928215,0.0007261683,0.00016632772,0.000923635,0.000026844957,0.0005726272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560102,0.024377918,0.008708274,0.0042394986,0.00531197,0.0013521079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4754188,0.35171708,0.1460413,0.014175691,0.009744325,0.002902808],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030794287,0.00041330687,0.0012864525,0.011932882,0.0014211155,0.0050893314,0.00089174596,0.0013694956,0.0047035906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16672672,0.0005371082,0.0006014609,0.02068064,0.0018896988,0.0045742053,0.0027944895,0.00073570287,0.0004795559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005433381,0.000105001025,0.9427883,0.0029749682,0.001529461,0.0007912164,0.013634198,0.00011243833,0.0014334834,0.0017809934,0.0034682297,0.030838367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000784795,0.0001391087,0.96842927,0.0008714204,0.0010955571,0.0011905573,0.012309666,0.00024001763,0.001144469,0.0020466559,0.012413211,0.000041670606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028707695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053957645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96920574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000863656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087776885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16285771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969751061","doi":"10.1177/0963662519868969","title":"The critical reception of the <i>DSM-5</i>: Towards a typology of audiences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Typology; Naturalism; Association (psychology); Meaning (existential); Psychology; Common ground; Narrative; Humanism; Sociology; Narratology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.1251424667542597,"score_gpt":0.3140854409436589,"score_spread":0.18894297418939923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969751061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6225226,0.008028984,0.01593921,0.103969164,0.001909414,0.00021686517,0.00021153968,0.00013319278,0.24706903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910987,0.0011388011,0.0009289059,0.0030180998,0.0005348256,0.000086945525,0.0000502385,0.00011589083,0.0030275178],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.954358,0.035384268,0.0012888698,0.0015570559,0.005220475,0.0021913438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9330817,0.05379729,0.0055205673,0.0022665905,0.003314704,0.0020191595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035180792,0.0009609126,0.00075375853,0.0068600085,0.017114626,0.022668872,0.0018979947,0.004457704,0.0035243144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053315684,0.0005977694,0.00058836566,0.004006975,0.052119274,0.021500751,0.019398153,0.007671793,0.00061032467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022408347,0.0000070711326,0.0013250809,0.00009061717,0.0000050415006,0.00023002565,0.9200584,0.000023324626,0.00030616502,0.07223173,0.0017559937,0.003944055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273188,0.00002157907,0.001542597,0.00057817384,0.000010570624,0.00029253992,0.9037773,0.00014625245,0.00036967712,0.02993718,0.06328671,0.000029205055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032032568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001909406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98288536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077927085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035091897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18605602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008656998","doi":"10.1177/0963662520905466","title":"Assessing YouTube science news’ credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Popularity; Source credibility; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.22678584172344918,"score_gpt":0.3819570587012111,"score_spread":0.15517121697776193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008656998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99828714,0.00004546628,0.00018566391,0.00004241995,0.000003489518,0.0000338986,0.0000943871,0.00000362658,0.0013039227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867743,0.000042889696,0.000584902,0.000022996666,0.0000057735506,0.000049622893,0.00014971347,0.0000047135113,0.000461883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980263,0.0010979308,0.00016651838,0.00012236854,0.0004669589,0.00011978792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527165,0.03591256,0.0050036255,0.0010911317,0.0038714595,0.0014046552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041589644,0.00017475066,0.00026314697,0.00093920797,0.00055322034,0.001247078,0.0001944991,0.00034596867,0.003098299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036415454,0.000096287346,0.00027281657,0.0005949564,0.00030995437,0.0011224395,0.00075790443,0.0003603962,0.0002239314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015277788,0.00074590824,0.92329144,0.00027665144,0.0001838751,0.00026376697,0.010536391,0.00032350214,0.0050400863,0.0002838144,0.00074730697,0.056779448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050878654,0.0008467839,0.98259544,0.000053044154,0.00009051479,0.00023697772,0.008805484,0.0026104955,0.003064597,0.00027861883,0.0013280923,0.000039139843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052072653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009139264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039939545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038858567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021994948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036239323","doi":"10.1177/0963662520923110","title":"What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Templeton Religion Trust","keywords":"Publics; Sociology; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Social science; Politics; Existentialism; Field (mathematics); Norm (philosophy); Social science education; Science education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6248035204532549,"score_gpt":0.4449237684640692,"score_spread":0.1798797519891857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036239323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95116657,0.0012981321,0.0055020708,0.010115312,0.00010977466,0.000031141284,0.000029235394,0.000012894458,0.031734876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980422,0.00038053465,0.00046099068,0.00043908323,0.00001840289,0.000010469505,0.000013655303,0.0000073673828,0.00062719244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878384,0.009386705,0.00030355417,0.0005201231,0.0011183136,0.0008328048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96862304,0.022838963,0.0041085873,0.001194701,0.0015249763,0.0017096638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016623683,0.00033135695,0.00042820827,0.0030293497,0.008513022,0.009224223,0.00089836854,0.002124591,0.0022903841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028150965,0.0004543105,0.00037357368,0.001809483,0.027776869,0.01245781,0.007836412,0.004484653,0.00032445535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013196372,0.0000142944755,0.007754519,0.000033636534,0.000007663323,0.00010340033,0.9811928,0.000029810066,0.00023546569,0.007462161,0.0002030236,0.0029500304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029138175,0.000026487796,0.0054975064,0.00009942131,0.000006465715,0.00023072913,0.9779383,0.00016576723,0.00011478222,0.008544521,0.007355403,0.000017797487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008912512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095024705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99148697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031903912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002749521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08791554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048214453","doi":"10.1177/0963662520946667","title":"Effects of gender harassment on science popularization behaviors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Harassment; Legitimacy; Science communication; Clothing; Public relations; Public engagement; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Science education; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.2413896625906315,"score_gpt":0.4029488181134472,"score_spread":0.1615591555228157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048214453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961068,0.00010383089,0.0003269773,0.0002546946,0.000027408845,0.0000695118,0.00004840471,0.000008618557,0.003053757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983498,0.00007618547,0.0003349162,0.0002236068,0.00002353243,0.00011462258,0.000034770983,0.000007837821,0.0008347969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878456,0.008028611,0.0006278014,0.00080693787,0.001658289,0.0010327302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93030834,0.042477988,0.016209288,0.0031795045,0.0039222594,0.0039026958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009738523,0.00044188014,0.00035094778,0.0012660658,0.0023692371,0.0024203346,0.00044496576,0.00069857977,0.007963815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039466377,0.00032191252,0.00056351547,0.0005456778,0.0019130626,0.001484562,0.0022213282,0.0017618118,0.0006907307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016640958,0.0042038173,0.84366757,0.00024780477,0.00018437322,0.00067859306,0.08833742,0.00010580163,0.004938817,0.0013326524,0.0010401397,0.053598978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041032323,0.0028679743,0.9042075,0.00014241862,0.00010787189,0.00035147366,0.084380805,0.00036068782,0.0024963908,0.00066032866,0.004311248,0.00007234038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002731047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031190622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008510914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079841865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051502824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081647417","doi":"10.1177/0963662520950671","title":"Exploring scholars’ public engagement goals in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kavli Foundation; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; Burroughs Wellcome Fund","keywords":"Public engagement; Demographics; Agency (philosophy); Sample (material); Public relations; Funding Agency; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.4329928537704818,"score_gpt":0.3110697779997487,"score_spread":0.12192307577073308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081647417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534614,0.000956728,0.000421363,0.009849552,0.00006905431,0.00012975867,0.0005193929,0.00002030222,0.034572247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952544,0.00058784575,0.00027990644,0.0007581864,0.000013401533,0.00006524299,0.00019190615,0.00001144534,0.002837616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879125,0.0019555844,0.00036216268,0.00072938,0.004581764,0.004458679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574905,0.00718213,0.0035155339,0.0008595933,0.017326836,0.0136253685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015124498,0.00024851118,0.00085912494,0.0075416253,0.024621129,0.012100972,0.0021454715,0.0013572935,0.0017044303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036686927,0.00033084876,0.00034362826,0.015127125,0.007602883,0.0029324342,0.00862762,0.0029247163,0.00016555851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017497341,0.00025943192,0.34784663,0.00017240236,0.00005755002,0.00035772272,0.55220324,0.00037637664,0.00042950435,0.029958976,0.009874013,0.058289096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023654356,0.000053851058,0.29988635,0.0002515971,0.00002845019,0.000050207058,0.6530961,0.0005190834,0.00034683215,0.0027065983,0.04294783,0.00008945844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99415624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14099322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.252724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963261},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3093329438","doi":"10.1177/0963662520963365","title":"Knowledge, (mis-)conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Disease; Middle East respiratory syndrome; Outbreak; Risk perception; Social distance; Perception; Hygiene; Environmental health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Psychology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Virology","score_opus":0.4714173073633237,"score_gpt":0.49172868567535855,"score_spread":0.020311378312034833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093329438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028491387,0.9989618,0.00007837157,0.00023701241,0.00006064986,0.000032425287,0.00006420489,0.0000021208466,0.00027859161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024839847,0.9970016,0.00017243503,0.00014891874,0.000029206087,0.000057107212,0.000055180808,0.0000013414405,0.000050340735],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960665,0.0013699617,0.0013013219,0.00032794214,0.00081739103,0.00011694029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97026193,0.024989462,0.0023597698,0.0003240782,0.0018629328,0.00020186846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076549165,0.0012436978,0.0030661514,0.013023597,0.0008211331,0.0026848386,0.0011475481,0.0018840565,0.002636131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028177576,0.000817454,0.0036935916,0.013566641,0.0011719854,0.0025962652,0.0018226252,0.0012972486,0.0003732483],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084994484,0.000041942792,0.0015225149,0.66481006,0.0033458453,0.00018693821,0.0013566035,0.00024186181,0.0001894691,0.0015587645,0.0053641815,0.32129675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031226045,0.00009584383,0.006299019,0.8717008,0.012217339,0.0005800754,0.0013388019,0.000089392524,0.00023006699,0.0013988805,0.10596979,0.000048835715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009334374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022511093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013023597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029654189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011127091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040483594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094400678","doi":"10.1177/0963662520965490","title":"Population health AI researchers’ perceptions of the public portrayal of AI: A pilot study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Sensationalism; Perception; Population health; Psychology; Population; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.4910734703954394,"score_gpt":0.4745531649617737,"score_spread":0.016520305433665727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094400678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99149686,0.00027471746,0.00016094101,0.0013759747,0.000041450192,0.00020557988,0.00014942084,0.000006969171,0.0062879845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631363,0.0005069473,0.000255055,0.0008754959,0.000049627117,0.00031240575,0.00008514333,0.000011471407,0.0015902249],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97200567,0.0152379,0.0013644545,0.001154819,0.0053941677,0.004842985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138698,0.044219393,0.010461952,0.003699452,0.021244043,0.0065053343],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04024935,0.00052160746,0.0008574598,0.0055831643,0.012189877,0.0106738545,0.001562641,0.0020786133,0.004728809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07055125,0.000924209,0.000739233,0.004961037,0.009878927,0.003955569,0.0073775,0.004201799,0.00066308945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011018056,0.0001432588,0.027445378,0.00013240457,0.000012362448,0.00026599632,0.96673244,0.000010890382,0.00029640205,0.00037689228,0.0006305843,0.0038432947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014111033,0.0001704953,0.018375501,0.00011246773,0.000016242675,0.000068109555,0.97674084,0.000024989551,0.00012141091,0.00006986871,0.0042632855,0.000022703609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46854946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4655766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98781013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020297766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024357082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9316444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118396830","doi":"10.1177/0963662520982540","title":"Co-producing uncertainty in public science: The case of genomic selection in forestry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Forestry; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5320797320514963,"score_gpt":0.4481629911374109,"score_spread":0.08391674091408535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118396830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3729722,0.003059458,0.059031677,0.3749478,0.0005612805,0.00015263633,0.000096849195,0.00009792543,0.1890802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375993,0.00028059204,0.0021529472,0.0027531509,0.0001323175,0.00005075415,0.000011463575,0.00002346218,0.00083536404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.878618,0.09873307,0.0019047509,0.0051050526,0.010172753,0.0054663727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6252881,0.33675748,0.013858975,0.010952432,0.008351892,0.004791091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11100465,0.0007125129,0.0009726959,0.00436203,0.030516263,0.027361352,0.0026899816,0.016112562,0.0057317135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14752954,0.00092388503,0.001030896,0.0039640996,0.069060825,0.027000481,0.025164591,0.016458316,0.00045084194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010575081,0.00007069478,0.006104995,0.0001629705,0.000055812074,0.002506766,0.44371745,0.0015501144,0.00063655287,0.51969427,0.0041350066,0.021259613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052898315,0.00006350989,0.002779396,0.0005565115,0.000053836236,0.0007438947,0.2522086,0.0034793548,0.00089928677,0.6596809,0.07935749,0.00012436483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008447648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057650716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96948373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017299147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01249547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5870557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209737204","doi":"10.1177/09636625211051970","title":"Science communication skills as an asset across disciplines: A 10-year case study of students’ motivation patterns at Université Laval","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Science communication; Communication skills; Psychology; Science education; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4230862481454705,"score_gpt":0.47902038454205986,"score_spread":0.05593413639658934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209737204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993974,0.000031443884,0.000037668957,0.00017310277,0.000004413047,0.000012344056,0.000021085138,0.0000016076922,0.0003209847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.00006661251,0.00014405149,0.00010233805,0.000006097119,0.0000246076,0.000034257646,0.0000034127518,0.001122185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718505,0.000842607,0.00009759969,0.0002631299,0.0006196727,0.0009918986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993188,0.0012800915,0.0010894503,0.00020351468,0.0011272376,0.0031116342],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037161345,0.0003230938,0.00039031016,0.0019266255,0.0069875475,0.0033389472,0.0013709167,0.0011907814,0.0015632556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005607127,0.00043577157,0.0005128021,0.0012792484,0.0018379557,0.0014983375,0.0034745834,0.0021198108,0.00036196096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012039082,0.002339893,0.71708363,0.000053209646,0.000030671046,0.0022121994,0.2518088,0.0001245189,0.0009795328,0.00058062165,0.0012653071,0.023401175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013640608,0.000725922,0.5178965,0.00006553445,0.000017201526,0.00079523656,0.47378296,0.00040797872,0.0006079706,0.00013048029,0.00549899,0.000057578487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14795242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33300334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99666107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075425534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008698682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29418254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310572720","doi":"10.1177/09636625221135425","title":"Heuristic responses to pandemic uncertainty: Practicable communication strategies of “reasoned transparency” to aid public reception of changing science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Science communication; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Heuristic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Science education; Medicine; Computer security; Virology; Artificial intelligence; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.6298813795993575,"score_gpt":0.4749396006509381,"score_spread":0.15494177894841943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310572720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35914394,0.002569551,0.3522367,0.12752374,0.00077321916,0.0009552673,0.00016654431,0.0007746267,0.15585642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957105,0.0003055168,0.03909914,0.0020856194,0.000057408408,0.00020473397,0.000035402245,0.000053898537,0.0010533779],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95355743,0.04041843,0.0010335136,0.001309475,0.0023010883,0.0013800383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9011371,0.075688995,0.00960166,0.007863463,0.003985828,0.0017228731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046821177,0.0009652954,0.0004593254,0.0029717023,0.005345436,0.010004333,0.0029449905,0.0049186978,0.0036403788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09501553,0.00079868926,0.0010748734,0.001550249,0.027533885,0.014272579,0.008926739,0.0063550468,0.0004768262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019303313,0.00015038483,0.0094227735,0.00063930376,0.00010828424,0.00078019814,0.57837373,0.0027354732,0.002034275,0.34026694,0.0056385365,0.05965709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015721774,0.00022752925,0.004271627,0.001118772,0.00012157678,0.0007314387,0.29583257,0.014081671,0.0028369196,0.5927028,0.08766277,0.0002551088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003217538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003139457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99465454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051653585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067727724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.247617},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4315754093","doi":"10.1177/09636625221141663","title":"Brain-computer interfaces, disability, and the stigma of refusal: A factorial vignette study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Vignette; Blame; Psychology; Anger; Stigma (botany); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12719089807302328,"score_gpt":0.3554422314485006,"score_spread":0.22825133337547734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315754093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989643,0.0000130005055,0.0001862932,0.00008347088,0.00000530411,0.00025080136,0.000022778464,0.000002756093,0.00047123525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666095,0.00008154882,0.0010956246,0.00024717583,0.0000150539,0.0011331108,0.000086342516,0.0000034100278,0.0006767147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912177,0.0070721935,0.00030509642,0.0003037508,0.00067423197,0.0004270785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660019,0.026562985,0.0026485848,0.00209218,0.0012243935,0.0014699891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008665211,0.00059228024,0.0006186423,0.0008720388,0.0040170657,0.0021379762,0.00072920794,0.0018641851,0.0033927746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043230418,0.0006750256,0.0006632866,0.0008113628,0.0026151475,0.0017861011,0.001815885,0.0025165,0.00041543614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013837408,0.172732,0.2419578,0.0010736987,0.00038172348,0.002508329,0.48232245,0.0029658198,0.013233076,0.0146941235,0.0037394066,0.050554197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053647477,0.07817067,0.5528089,0.00057985407,0.00034890976,0.0023502621,0.30574042,0.014762994,0.010678076,0.00963171,0.018705478,0.00085793366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040772455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045044334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008665211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030771685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001340591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045826554},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4379509183","doi":"10.1177/09636625231174845","title":"Believing in science: Linking religious beliefs and identity with vaccination intentions and trust in science during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Legitimacy; Ideology; Social psychology; Pandemic; Identity (music); Public health; Religious identity; Science communication; Vaccination; Skepticism; Psychology; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Public trust; Politics; Public engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Science education; Epistemology; Law; Immunology","score_opus":0.08528824625014327,"score_gpt":0.35604111844213426,"score_spread":0.270752872191991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379509183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985279,0.00006443021,0.00003442385,0.000271003,0.0000041566254,0.000011395971,0.000044686953,8.012109e-7,0.0010411707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995577,0.00006306884,0.000040317427,0.000046780366,0.000002125936,0.0000055932805,0.00004079991,8.3296845e-7,0.00024273929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987596,0.000394344,0.00009255956,0.00011681938,0.00030098463,0.00033574234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846401,0.004819496,0.0056722485,0.0009039524,0.0016563685,0.0023078532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037055537,0.00014315282,0.0002461249,0.0007428762,0.0015356095,0.0019894852,0.0005990318,0.00078140775,0.0028438454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019201467,0.00027436283,0.00043960757,0.000630387,0.0016122413,0.0008404596,0.0012306981,0.0016718092,0.00018356985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009275659,0.00022484001,0.9809027,0.000023923174,0.000047453068,0.00005455599,0.013507111,0.00004313397,0.0001266125,0.00020188521,0.00020888413,0.0045661926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006284972,0.00004978439,0.9852866,0.00004921504,0.000018689705,0.000033543787,0.013655795,0.00025854158,0.00005789157,0.0001457487,0.0004270499,0.000010733627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29996878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3273034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029295345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037878642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59644556},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4385997351","doi":"10.1177/09636625231191633","title":"Comparing the influence of intellectual humility, religiosity, and political conservatism on vaccine attitudes in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Religiosity; Humility; Conservatism; Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13272707038701692,"score_gpt":0.32958762949980164,"score_spread":0.19686055911278472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385997351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987116,0.0002461221,0.000018327983,0.00010421068,0.0000028488132,0.0000054329894,0.00009079956,9.3982067e-7,0.0008197044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993912,0.00020035771,0.00003645418,0.000043154178,0.00000215453,0.000004661189,0.00011109974,8.278726e-7,0.00021001132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902856,0.0003551723,0.00006160743,0.00006557351,0.00021988111,0.00026929454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918745,0.003183749,0.0016396672,0.00023210283,0.0017836302,0.0012863667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018681659,0.00016983111,0.00026148884,0.0011482533,0.0011342489,0.0012452091,0.0003362353,0.0003035942,0.0012722136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076278234,0.00017869183,0.0006816114,0.0017323493,0.0010331686,0.00029225336,0.0006314847,0.00055601867,0.00008571761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007126117,0.000019640866,0.99592775,0.000014937111,0.000065318454,0.000026094795,0.0015475937,0.000046902634,0.000053055734,0.000095472,0.00008687595,0.0020450517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032430598,0.000022307438,0.9975055,0.000016722866,0.000026156706,0.000013648545,0.0020982556,0.000087428816,0.00004138432,0.000016188074,0.00016502327,0.0000042678275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9050931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.936585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094906926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055242484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007979335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19093168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387388262","doi":"10.3109/a036854","title":"Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Journalism; Public relations; Advice (programming); Popular science; Science communication; Media literacy; Literacy; Sociology; Psychology; Science education; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Media studies; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4662405871462212,"score_gpt":0.4757859517315292,"score_spread":0.009545364585308025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387388262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863643,0.0009775216,0.00009624937,0.0015407692,0.000036876616,0.000022252205,0.0001389306,0.000015127437,0.010807964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957867,0.0011871767,0.00014080321,0.0005329078,0.00012267426,0.00003836559,0.00018993187,0.000028574881,0.0019729498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667597,0.0013832379,0.00033492225,0.0002206299,0.001048922,0.00033640504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9239215,0.05267428,0.012282796,0.0009857097,0.0071780635,0.0029575536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056708436,0.00018707754,0.0004199008,0.004614778,0.001187031,0.004487388,0.000479012,0.0014083801,0.008806804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050241057,0.00023352183,0.00032669512,0.00435777,0.0014328886,0.004328353,0.00141821,0.0010876101,0.0007863235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018457767,0.0008993329,0.488833,0.0013343897,0.0001883071,0.0011691423,0.37157497,0.00013166633,0.002941697,0.0030451631,0.00704236,0.12099421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071268645,0.00063614594,0.7709464,0.00037104613,0.000121201076,0.0002469219,0.20728922,0.0003497133,0.0008029959,0.00064335065,0.01845302,0.000068709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064422884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00982394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015942203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012082878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029990673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389735731","doi":"10.1177/09636625231210453","title":"Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Genome Alberta; Ontario Genomics; Genome Canada","keywords":"Publics; Typology; Public engagement; Perception; Public relations; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Public awareness of science; Public opinion; Political science; Science communication; Social science; Epistemology; Science education","score_opus":0.8881191807214109,"score_gpt":0.5376860809207465,"score_spread":0.3504330998006644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389735731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92572635,0.00065600505,0.009119771,0.02822527,0.00014629085,0.0001757844,0.00007754585,0.000053274016,0.035819635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936945,0.00035821402,0.0017727454,0.0014650116,0.00003452485,0.000093964154,0.000023387118,0.00004800259,0.0025096892],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582719,0.034439832,0.0005437865,0.0014943246,0.002097588,0.003152574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93713266,0.052598875,0.0028578583,0.0023810058,0.001966805,0.003062773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028208554,0.0005830347,0.00071175816,0.0024472275,0.03881073,0.011615868,0.0026830442,0.0074546393,0.0062796697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041391663,0.0006228856,0.0007793902,0.0033871538,0.03224095,0.013679013,0.013479291,0.009806061,0.0006648483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037458067,0.00015937867,0.0023019712,0.00006245973,0.000005947018,0.002515005,0.9646823,0.00008678095,0.00037426388,0.023309503,0.0011029773,0.005362037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083743,0.00003785868,0.00084856414,0.000094917734,0.0000055325672,0.00037687912,0.97607416,0.00017951617,0.00027301747,0.005717524,0.016367551,0.000016081225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016920337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027654003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96118927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013506064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009000868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14918286},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4391321098","doi":"10.1177/09636625231220226","title":"The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Skepticism; Politics; Reflexivity; Newspaper; Neutrality; Climate change; Sociology; Climate science; News media; Political science; Social science; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Epistemology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.600456464784278,"score_gpt":0.4432853046471829,"score_spread":0.15717116013709514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391321098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6204804,0.0026012976,0.0015865174,0.016959183,0.00015257679,0.00006441553,0.0005230599,0.00004165827,0.35759076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961224,0.00044777925,0.00021588856,0.00032816452,0.000023400658,0.000008584617,0.000055499473,0.000014859207,0.002783462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953082,0.0010876266,0.00008327363,0.0004324458,0.0019221774,0.0011662365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99327177,0.0030852025,0.00089662673,0.0002693755,0.0018602391,0.00061677664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038118095,0.0004276571,0.00032535673,0.0068877293,0.022360314,0.014687725,0.0008990973,0.0015237826,0.0066068685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011732983,0.0003490018,0.000345968,0.00891095,0.01374969,0.0033008454,0.004080478,0.0024816543,0.0002894433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022754825,0.00006863955,0.055881757,0.0003138974,0.000077661614,0.00078331766,0.5550846,0.0008538698,0.0024017445,0.32740802,0.012324749,0.044574186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042896485,0.00003782733,0.17944057,0.0005700959,0.00019673296,0.00014984357,0.56068665,0.0018549645,0.001937511,0.030604376,0.22430575,0.00017284366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9380668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11019885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11019885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044129085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7995523},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391321383","doi":"10.1177/09636625231219853","title":"Who are the publics engaging in AI?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publics; Affordance; Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.4211150533307218,"score_gpt":0.4773886732174504,"score_spread":0.056273619886728576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391321383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060217236,0.91974056,0.0016857487,0.04192857,0.00062467414,0.00009815978,0.00016869651,0.000015194231,0.029716764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13775639,0.84960806,0.0019172914,0.007773829,0.0006186891,0.0003098834,0.00016396014,0.000020112999,0.0018316325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794317,0.014955991,0.0012754317,0.0010043251,0.002435911,0.0008966152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95774764,0.033558007,0.003709309,0.0008770645,0.003361316,0.0007465481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022495514,0.0004953834,0.0016112776,0.0065130414,0.0020610902,0.011450948,0.0011033535,0.003469876,0.004272403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045948774,0.00053175795,0.0009861328,0.008914189,0.0056912983,0.015592004,0.0037522197,0.003208666,0.000900273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019349891,0.00006750404,0.0050384244,0.061294995,0.00042655793,0.00035882104,0.035185464,0.00022028056,0.00041740062,0.18457024,0.019346695,0.69288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059965685,0.00007922948,0.0067255874,0.11073864,0.00072890316,0.000675639,0.062736064,0.00012888687,0.00046438383,0.0769608,0.7406407,0.00006108551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060510198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009167513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022495514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005046455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011483392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11896902},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391650317","doi":"10.1177/09636625241227091","title":"Gene editing in animals: What does the public want to know and what information do stakeholder organizations provide?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public relations; Public engagement; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027256239789286853,"score_gpt":0.2803478450636607,"score_spread":0.2530916052743738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391650317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64283025,0.0027192028,0.00665857,0.3134252,0.00037861225,0.00023245113,0.0006135004,0.000080304046,0.03306191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768703,0.0015163391,0.0014553879,0.01859004,0.00013689783,0.00014918535,0.00014542237,0.000027655346,0.0011086673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96882254,0.021647114,0.0012694515,0.0010122731,0.003414552,0.0038340513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87248605,0.08891643,0.014581002,0.0029399807,0.012469092,0.008607444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05240124,0.00036688062,0.00064303965,0.0019253542,0.0062728235,0.008720411,0.00087185774,0.005321766,0.005394856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08586108,0.0004756656,0.000574061,0.0019844065,0.0071756626,0.011804396,0.005616898,0.005069102,0.0009577117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041723793,0.0005948884,0.21099158,0.002432276,0.00014016297,0.0020431534,0.61184347,0.00038866364,0.005356169,0.03028276,0.024563853,0.11094584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003461041,0.000294871,0.04618924,0.0020944774,0.00008598398,0.00077612634,0.8350777,0.0006261135,0.0014832598,0.015622668,0.097560674,0.00015427895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006945884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049912487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05240124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004434165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006842637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27712756},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4403332823","doi":"10.1177/09636625241268881","title":"Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preprint; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Population; Pandemic; Term (time); Media studies; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.7307891558044088,"score_gpt":0.5019906325918755,"score_spread":0.22879852321253336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403332823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126844,0.0027234533,0.008474625,0.04022113,0.00058851135,0.00010267614,0.00025609144,0.00012458245,0.0348246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940739,0.0011689946,0.00085901236,0.0022958315,0.0003686517,0.000043987573,0.00014471565,0.00006251883,0.000982389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519732,0.031520076,0.003194018,0.002251435,0.008869456,0.0021918183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7621595,0.16586418,0.040959783,0.010499325,0.013811536,0.0067056795],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06067248,0.0005442317,0.0008300142,0.004426045,0.0047400277,0.019239359,0.0014361413,0.0035484233,0.0036984996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17980845,0.00065266533,0.0007105011,0.0025635213,0.010298469,0.01820854,0.010281763,0.006471389,0.00073441333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032408827,0.00008816924,0.063423686,0.00052542577,0.00009874778,0.0008197326,0.8747269,0.00019414545,0.0018428398,0.017216284,0.005301705,0.035438277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004600179,0.00020352493,0.05420301,0.0012539967,0.00013698384,0.00065729674,0.8527386,0.00096801005,0.0011569873,0.021295318,0.06718475,0.00015553612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035494484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017895006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98076063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004847829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031504447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32087058},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4404044890","doi":"10.1177/09636625241287392","title":"Sociotechnical imaginaries of gene editing in food and agriculture: A comparative content analysis of mass media in the United States, New Zealand, Japan, the Netherlands, and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Division of Social and Economic Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Legitimacy; Narrative; Sociology; Agriculture; Civil society; Public relations; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.048799362416089245,"score_gpt":0.28788765434738717,"score_spread":0.23908829193129794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404044890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906551,0.00024946092,0.00018551659,0.00036316548,0.00001167991,0.0000331931,0.000171547,0.0000032484954,0.008327045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979054,0.00055699196,0.00025915628,0.00010054883,0.0000115783805,0.00004951384,0.00018061217,0.000010172761,0.0009260762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777216,0.0008035576,0.00012035806,0.00018472536,0.00074116583,0.0003780369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830639,0.0100556575,0.0025688848,0.0003059124,0.003230255,0.00077543047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040462823,0.00030601252,0.00030814,0.0072929496,0.0042426405,0.0057853158,0.0006014219,0.0005450903,0.0017722938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012588658,0.0002585605,0.00020977625,0.007998283,0.005161971,0.002457355,0.0031004085,0.0009592213,0.00007011298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012960989,0.00003748364,0.08923469,0.0001947225,0.000038379716,0.00043653412,0.8899349,0.000068871865,0.0019512608,0.0021438552,0.00058107654,0.015248624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005292401,0.000015616559,0.123013504,0.00015878915,0.000027063428,0.00006716954,0.8679026,0.00015387172,0.00034295578,0.00016989704,0.008120922,0.000022310185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62264985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7562343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99575734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015312572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012010745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7591449},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4411809595","doi":"10.1177/09636625251347063","title":"Contesting state expertise after COVID-19","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Negotiation; CONTEST; Political science; Public relations; Scholarship; State (computer science); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Boundary-work; Pandemic; Sociology; Transformational leadership; Social science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.25988621924541716,"score_gpt":0.41929784124342706,"score_spread":0.1594116219980099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411809595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8755324,0.00033510957,0.003998815,0.015162981,0.00015259377,0.00004369734,0.000027934893,0.000030754712,0.10471571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975674,0.000032423533,0.0001246525,0.00038926816,0.000010749392,0.000008332867,0.00000649173,0.0000063503603,0.0018543073],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906199,0.004768062,0.00020892727,0.00079344446,0.001310702,0.002298942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847948,0.0086886445,0.0018563493,0.00096708926,0.0013749142,0.0023181883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009338436,0.00024761716,0.0004553888,0.0009733248,0.019958282,0.00780972,0.0009172702,0.00325398,0.0051708156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0189406,0.00026105114,0.00031350553,0.00077390386,0.031335082,0.0049115336,0.013545879,0.005907209,0.0003250631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051071987,0.000038712158,0.005987392,0.000040431296,0.000009646627,0.0008818408,0.9123638,0.00015645086,0.00125509,0.07003177,0.0015713834,0.007612434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015485968,0.000068223315,0.009743857,0.000111024354,0.000009253287,0.0002852915,0.88452053,0.0005171039,0.0006840192,0.032301206,0.07168455,0.00005938955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054555938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08764973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98004174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009830543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009174442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10847682},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4414525180","doi":"10.1177/09636625251367685","title":"Scientists’ public engagement goals: Perceived importance and personal prioritization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Public engagement; Sense of agency; Agency (philosophy); Prioritization; Social engagement; Survey data collection; Goal setting; Social media","score_opus":0.586152365656085,"score_gpt":0.45622151658434057,"score_spread":0.1299308490717444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414525180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980724,0.000041735708,0.00006839994,0.00009480573,0.0000040480327,0.000016545113,0.00036582706,0.0000023479593,0.0013339102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978537,0.000071079936,0.00012450683,0.00013255325,0.000007598573,0.000036624777,0.0005716447,0.0000032193261,0.0011989976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.00017929144,0.00003439662,0.00007519851,0.0002463422,0.0002241376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968952,0.00078985194,0.0009808665,0.00013504077,0.00062726677,0.000571755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014618413,0.00015234663,0.00022681488,0.0010670038,0.0025073255,0.0009957269,0.00027939468,0.00037521892,0.0028530401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036586227,0.00022146854,0.00026548785,0.001663305,0.00078895275,0.0005431281,0.00091858953,0.0011896458,0.0004966654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007821199,0.00018589677,0.9806486,0.000018893435,0.000047408077,0.000052968295,0.010417452,0.00008828785,0.00024588435,0.00015818691,0.0016594717,0.006398886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014233008,0.000047133988,0.9769876,0.000015578535,0.000016761212,0.000052877454,0.019294634,0.00033694977,0.00018782547,0.000100980345,0.002935133,0.000010136093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51281923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6658102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99853814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028784603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028817002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98009974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417414414","doi":"10.1177/09636625251372820","title":"Shedding light on public perceptions of scientists who engage in wrongness admission amidst a failed replication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Perception; Public engagement; Public trust; Work (physics); Science communication; Public funding; Psychological science","score_opus":0.3669841485490524,"score_gpt":0.44967322132672016,"score_spread":0.08268907277766774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417414414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981157,0.0004252637,0.0034504128,0.008486768,0.00019759405,0.000096667885,0.000066014385,0.000045913763,0.0060745305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773705,0.00010891046,0.0008457107,0.00089209835,0.00006287141,0.000068828966,0.000028674649,0.000015443607,0.00024025481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.88517714,0.078471355,0.007935788,0.0048385956,0.018923888,0.0046531362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43313742,0.34125245,0.100291155,0.08102819,0.033999722,0.010291115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13642427,0.00042475664,0.0008861632,0.0016773655,0.0054194694,0.00638026,0.0014099731,0.0039863684,0.0035496864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38662863,0.0005657681,0.0011951962,0.0013613106,0.008829348,0.0066028107,0.0077295816,0.005437444,0.00038111059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022928359,0.00097063807,0.6048437,0.0009646491,0.0006902878,0.0014560974,0.27329743,0.000690621,0.015536556,0.015614224,0.0043429416,0.07930009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031239237,0.0021752585,0.6148427,0.0013909318,0.00081606704,0.0009839264,0.2819645,0.0043256856,0.013995778,0.050813053,0.02788096,0.00049864105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035640632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043573934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034816188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061070914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72148913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}