{"meta":{"query_hash":"ec9adcf975a2","filters":{"venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism"},"cohort_total":99,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":99,"exported":99,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ec9adcf975a2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Publius+The+Journal+of+Federalism"},"results":[{"id":"W1966039841","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt035","title":"Changing Federal Constitutions: Lessons from International Comparison, edited by Arthur Benz and Felix Knupling.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Political science; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Law; Public administration; History; Economics","score_opus":0.02770095170183245,"score_gpt":0.31647263395237274,"score_spread":0.2887716822505403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966039841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769895,0.0031855495,0.010340975,0.31290117,0.005403488,0.00042138295,0.00024175408,0.00007350313,0.0904427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936694,0.00036079067,0.00047377386,0.002549144,0.0017411613,0.0000045787465,0.000022381782,0.0000065344966,0.0011722393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835753,0.00020047964,0.00044105068,0.00010609197,0.0005450341,0.00034981844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815464,0.00053315185,0.00042499744,0.00009130946,0.0005575492,0.00023834356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007545012,0.0001257891,0.00022911964,0.00012355477,0.001596383,0.00076566415,0.0004044325,0.00007340456,0.00039266652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043211115,0.000093378825,0.00007864125,0.00016258683,0.0010352543,0.000802015,0.00007733209,0.0003405876,0.000020418163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027785205,0.00013328482,0.0053944276,0.0000031008083,0.0002807889,0.000006170431,0.0075374166,0.000101048296,0.00022919672,0.6763085,0.30571675,0.004261527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005996422,0.000035542005,0.0020112006,0.00006109906,0.000057366502,0.00005665543,0.013420003,0.00037075722,0.00004697599,0.005624508,0.97748905,0.0002271895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004538438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041458767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6717723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011521957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006179935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967031825","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv010","title":"Federalism and Women’s Representation: Do Federations have more Women Legislators than Centralized States?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05040549755963111,"score_gpt":0.33843418407964254,"score_spread":0.28802868652001146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967031825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93629944,0.0003770397,0.00027713217,0.053397182,0.0010335182,0.00031046532,0.000011662396,0.000030584193,0.008262975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922714,0.00055433554,0.00017195055,0.0011014641,0.0008060424,0.000022512637,0.0000073205456,0.00002128857,0.005043686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965469,0.00082949223,0.0006216833,0.00018904597,0.0011042311,0.0007085952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735314,0.00023421382,0.0005635337,0.00023480506,0.000823891,0.000790436],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029038994,0.00018774439,0.0003199006,0.00017739594,0.0015543447,0.0020318143,0.00038090424,0.00010462776,0.0001010422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005489766,0.00013254321,0.000093261384,0.0002421039,0.000367599,0.0011644912,0.000084551015,0.00031910415,0.000004951319],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015075656,0.00014539456,0.012694787,0.000012995087,0.00026447326,0.000032228018,0.9141735,0.00056709535,0.00006108383,0.024302091,0.04643771,0.0011578752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031651938,0.00021208209,0.018206436,0.000029114095,0.0000651054,0.00018770657,0.743562,0.00026905903,0.00012729321,0.09340503,0.14035304,0.00041798814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004074688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006451614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17061156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057388016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062787073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968502388","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq009","title":"Safeguarding Federalism in Education Policy in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Safeguarding; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Education policy; Enforcement; Political science; Autonomy; National Policy; Politics; New Federalism; Economic growth; Higher education; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.010009286994424596,"score_gpt":0.2873418114393782,"score_spread":0.2773325244449536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968502388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8536023,0.00015629629,0.0000071016725,0.14263132,0.00040901746,0.00010392868,0.0000011886577,0.0000032572977,0.0030856063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941908,0.00073689857,0.000021011932,0.0043639056,0.00050025823,0.000002812801,0.0000013906538,0.0000073617557,0.00017553783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808747,0.0008211398,0.00035440488,0.00006351278,0.00035398113,0.00031947004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988489,0.0006790317,0.00014866378,0.000090320485,0.00011570935,0.000117385294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034323826,0.00008779574,0.00017631883,0.00030839292,0.00057363126,0.00032063184,0.0003600982,0.000043735323,0.000021501151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082433183,0.000051433224,0.00003504164,0.00061458425,0.00017392545,0.0003480095,0.000022036818,0.0008066394,3.6080755e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045181758,0.0001377954,0.15299729,0.000033518067,0.000099665835,0.000024327142,0.47381923,0.0017135524,0.00035781716,0.31142512,0.011924074,0.0470158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041570934,0.00003613612,0.52673674,0.00014210748,0.000041818068,0.00016951836,0.11005034,0.0006327197,0.00005977703,0.050939884,0.30662957,0.00040428215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99619925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99452585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37373945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030028023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035558825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6307983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969401051","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004976","title":"The Federal Spending Power in Canada: Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032440156933772626,"score_gpt":0.2883594640292888,"score_spread":0.2559193070955162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969401051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8926061,0.00070400257,0.00019331281,0.05197813,0.003368629,0.00024388073,0.0000048495936,0.000008921581,0.05089219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687606,0.00009559122,0.0000754302,0.00062726374,0.0003181838,0.0000023063994,9.181503e-8,0.000008131016,0.0019969367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974032,0.0005790123,0.0005099296,0.00007885464,0.00093636254,0.00049262424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795234,0.0011345124,0.00044267555,0.000100919366,0.00021443701,0.0001551373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036232495,0.000097610005,0.00016831359,0.00004837094,0.0015402058,0.00056207343,0.00047653582,0.00004158284,0.00008222586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036400117,0.00005138363,0.000060079714,0.0003009556,0.0001054811,0.0005024716,0.000021370017,0.00032897326,0.0000018730899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003087861,0.000020007177,0.01247247,0.0000030650694,0.00003807042,0.00002711854,0.002428243,0.000070564514,0.00002902617,0.9725681,0.011773719,0.00053876964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007211617,0.00004610707,0.06130872,0.00011763538,0.000015148853,0.00014611654,0.010203372,0.00006303946,0.00012581401,0.028899474,0.89807844,0.00027494578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8641667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001490401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002829208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973235894","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq003","title":"What Explains the Paradox of Tobacco Control Policy under Federalism in the U.S. and Canada? Comparative Federalism Theory versus Multi-level Governance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tobacco control; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Multi-level governance; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Politics; Public health","score_opus":0.06829945013192025,"score_gpt":0.34424987592910017,"score_spread":0.27595042579717993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973235894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7962973,0.0014225357,0.00022766522,0.19711426,0.001610146,0.00046119915,0.00003774699,0.000009612993,0.002819538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902499,0.0011047377,0.00004534828,0.007449699,0.00079130084,0.000010928794,0.0000012676684,0.000016944616,0.00032992914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499696,0.0024276774,0.00068007474,0.00017609805,0.001069833,0.00064937485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950424,0.0035501544,0.0005856741,0.00032583057,0.00030518402,0.000190783],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053857053,0.00027254273,0.00049190107,0.000093842726,0.001877004,0.0010417853,0.0013498188,0.00013418257,0.00004201422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080810685,0.00014175203,0.00015731684,0.00035419723,0.0008692858,0.0011903465,0.00005352474,0.0014155274,0.0000011594718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012886623,0.00025869676,0.0033046987,0.000016749247,0.00048210984,0.00003315623,0.3238904,0.00060481654,0.00058606407,0.65181464,0.009392908,0.008327119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015218106,0.00034622193,0.5116798,0.00024873848,0.00030036666,0.00027770633,0.3348229,0.00022476327,0.00027443987,0.025246518,0.110342525,0.0010179272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5563893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9230567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6265681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020104459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016953277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976031580","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji010","title":"Shaping the Constitutional Dialogue on Federalism: Canada's Supreme Court as Meta-Political Actor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Politics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Political question; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.08276134096458518,"score_gpt":0.30945985077585153,"score_spread":0.22669850981126635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976031580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03675789,0.002158471,0.00015703875,0.8063821,0.0018113361,0.0002770302,0.000058689966,0.000025941095,0.1523715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732407,0.00022698748,0.000037140435,0.02278453,0.003185158,0.000008017251,0.0000026037046,0.000006155418,0.00050872867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996596,0.00054984784,0.0005201719,0.00013295117,0.0015873316,0.0006136994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974828,0.0011551593,0.00030201563,0.00013791365,0.0006305042,0.0002916089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020860464,0.00019937468,0.00038249508,0.000058542886,0.003952643,0.00040412773,0.0007229486,0.00007461727,0.00042987723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013519983,0.00010226511,0.0002703369,0.0002080675,0.0020175497,0.0003992858,0.00008099271,0.0005410205,0.000027909797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046920683,0.00004808663,0.00012309656,0.0000010446814,0.00056453934,0.00001574957,0.0008603624,0.00010372003,0.000010643639,0.9324589,0.06537126,0.00039567755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036163843,0.000052550487,0.0020115757,0.000023210498,0.00044741854,0.00014562305,0.0028654202,0.000010812783,0.00005865239,0.036084753,0.9577378,0.00020056621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40262726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56461084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006197619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037592235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989114191","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs024","title":"Is Federalism Gendered? Incorporating Gender into Studies of Federalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.15612299886843747,"score_gpt":0.4009926049919845,"score_spread":0.24486960612354705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989114191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9207211,0.007593552,0.00079759397,0.046096254,0.0039031603,0.000429208,0.000009781898,0.000040823394,0.020408534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227935,0.0009660831,0.001380048,0.0020810105,0.002067771,0.000005341966,0.0000027242963,0.000030497118,0.0011871697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556786,0.0010302153,0.0011211167,0.00016446778,0.0013859002,0.0007304672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602723,0.00047772922,0.001476326,0.00029999047,0.0013438466,0.00037488737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049479236,0.0002612855,0.0005333355,0.00025012798,0.0020023645,0.00040042767,0.0006637883,0.00014735134,0.00008757663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007063708,0.00017659047,0.00031323227,0.0003815146,0.00056134234,0.0014041805,0.00019058285,0.00045847317,0.000011872295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007683261,0.00039253032,0.019337699,0.0001865002,0.0013882434,0.000013757486,0.74148875,0.000114119335,0.0030221248,0.13685548,0.09311337,0.004010614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030518775,0.00032252277,0.055200644,0.00022043174,0.00079071487,0.000403469,0.51053137,0.0001249073,0.009021725,0.34719673,0.07178653,0.001349041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035771276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036372046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23095734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024599498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040849016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991974378","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjn029","title":"The Gradual Defederalization of Canadian Health Policy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Library science; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04426395727677823,"score_gpt":0.30849443906242274,"score_spread":0.2642304817856445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991974378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086082935,0.0017353197,0.000047751444,0.898335,0.000510521,0.0001756622,0.000051108218,0.0000063760835,0.013055347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777774,0.0065135984,0.00002643412,0.01115583,0.0009235454,7.837206e-7,9.3903134e-7,0.000008532401,0.0035929352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981082,0.00044981253,0.00041556073,0.00005070021,0.00052170904,0.00045399967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982847,0.00022054196,0.00061857677,0.00014354388,0.000300954,0.00043170404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018395495,0.00007579067,0.00015887842,0.0002971029,0.0030519976,0.00013304282,0.0005382344,0.000044670975,0.000016118809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000940998,0.000046855246,0.00009796545,0.00086567836,0.00040405974,0.00030453625,0.000014026754,0.00019456632,0.0000027265924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015736457,0.000011519396,0.00045857654,0.000002911408,0.000029572244,0.0000057178922,0.028171726,0.00003736825,0.0000038716375,0.2829177,0.685528,0.0028172964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018701747,0.000047113594,0.02245829,0.000015678932,0.0000051380002,0.000116083465,0.0009330545,0.000004316443,0.000013686422,0.005524827,0.9706325,0.00006230017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97720903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97595674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8916945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041540296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066586183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992593401","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl007","title":"Seceding The Canadian Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Injustice; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics; Self-determination; Negotiation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015011845501710532,"score_gpt":0.2702112275652706,"score_spread":0.2551993820635601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992593401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2685885,0.00035415345,0.00011508419,0.29755604,0.0018151692,0.00020146169,0.000013241936,0.000023836237,0.43133253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919099,0.000035799487,0.000075588556,0.0029970894,0.0015742689,0.0000010151649,0.0000010432411,0.000010353375,0.0033949115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979063,0.00041471107,0.00033240666,0.00006217287,0.0006706213,0.0006137861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850065,0.00044391621,0.0002104646,0.00015333336,0.0003895463,0.0003021004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033871573,0.000093711256,0.00013652355,0.000100376856,0.002376826,0.00074000895,0.00085635734,0.00008284817,0.00013560179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067169167,0.000050238647,0.0001157755,0.0002914677,0.0003883296,0.00040951394,0.000036052283,0.00046901611,0.00002298346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000843425,0.000023658138,0.0015097455,0.0000027016226,0.00003535255,0.000023273551,0.005730909,0.00010219899,0.000028206094,0.9242053,0.0664065,0.001923709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000299321,0.000044383283,0.03836269,0.000025661355,0.000068749425,0.00014271795,0.0052002566,0.00025893588,0.00002093862,0.17850907,0.7768555,0.00021175847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6166081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88808143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74569625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044935587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094900245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000728607","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs020","title":"Local Politics in Indonesia: Pathways to Power, by Nankyung Choi.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Decentralization; Devolution (biology); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Power (physics); Restructuring; Dictatorship; Revenue; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.020671447329547874,"score_gpt":0.2731866529485128,"score_spread":0.2525152056189649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000728607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7738207,0.011725668,0.0015400418,0.0651825,0.003587194,0.0003473039,0.0000149724565,0.000031770887,0.14374983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701494,0.00020689615,0.00006846591,0.001449481,0.0006290567,0.000002156997,3.071686e-7,0.000011510573,0.000617186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981508,0.0002951543,0.00036342314,0.00006320921,0.00053303083,0.0005943484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999041,0.0001408622,0.00021510012,0.000109533255,0.0001572831,0.000336222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021358388,0.00010582357,0.00022917167,0.00012408232,0.0007679238,0.00009265724,0.0003992946,0.000077737925,0.0000543612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017422432,0.00007492277,0.00008639649,0.00025956656,0.00021317168,0.0004838078,0.000072024195,0.000339404,0.000020025162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000626133,0.000371319,0.013935838,0.000009694149,0.00008473764,0.000022395929,0.22975303,0.000011266435,0.00021715363,0.11901246,0.62897754,0.007541947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039439605,0.000094753166,0.026346087,0.0000260221,0.000019703139,0.000029140623,0.07059391,9.770745e-7,0.000028948785,0.0005785428,0.901721,0.00016650032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013454971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006283681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27274346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004472862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019388668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5906326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006922539","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju012","title":"Federal Property Policy in Canadian Municipalities, edited by Michael C. Ircha and Robert Young","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013189992195465664,"score_gpt":0.269287690579817,"score_spread":0.2560976983843513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006922539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3929432,0.0013038,0.000090780544,0.27167207,0.0011824938,0.00029964268,0.000064692525,0.000022178403,0.33242115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847158,0.0002768101,0.000059365866,0.0053146896,0.0011810133,0.0000019914087,0.0000041990916,0.000008647775,0.008437493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980409,0.0005817229,0.00033139018,0.00008285754,0.00037154192,0.00059157633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878466,0.0002191743,0.00017951934,0.000106036365,0.00019389058,0.00051671575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984116,0.00011402662,0.00020980266,0.00019659696,0.0009655911,0.00030247256,0.000374006,0.00007912769,0.000032524913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070983544,0.00006982849,0.00004798061,0.0002373562,0.00073035265,0.00040832337,0.000035833353,0.00032265973,0.0000019287302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026300588,0.000035037683,0.014730756,0.000007849129,0.00004033068,0.000008791249,0.014186428,0.000019221136,0.000033238448,0.905094,0.06410144,0.0017165608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030148996,0.000042990177,0.0030266016,0.000025845828,0.000010402327,0.00008863754,0.0026340776,0.000057556994,0.0000033343345,0.0020535837,0.99162525,0.00013021323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9630578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85293484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92752385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040923594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033529154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7426644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007008393","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02491157245994363,"score_gpt":0.2890151189613681,"score_spread":0.2641035465014245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007008393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89622897,0.0010294016,0.000028381732,0.099555515,0.00036305827,0.00014370553,0.000015787518,0.000004662293,0.0026305043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991587,0.0012950368,0.000014934665,0.00625311,0.00047023458,0.0000013178014,0.000004902197,0.0000042505108,0.0003692513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980218,0.00030542546,0.0004141234,0.000096096024,0.0007485737,0.00041398863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987659,0.0005376697,0.00023403164,0.00006440624,0.00024603872,0.0001519572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033945986,0.00013167603,0.00021811457,0.000101725076,0.0014394367,0.00032686332,0.000286824,0.000057632453,0.000028240054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021673494,0.0000766145,0.0000325098,0.00025513396,0.0005616053,0.0002879153,0.000047210287,0.000385367,4.6589844e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033762853,0.00015111991,0.02606486,0.000010817405,0.0002237065,0.00027824607,0.025185319,0.000042103467,0.000072402305,0.19416066,0.7500974,0.0033757717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007751266,0.00007110967,0.10135341,0.00003290395,0.000055122004,0.00013830587,0.009029979,0.000005316963,0.00001680238,0.020390037,0.8679326,0.00019924203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9631752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93278426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17377062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014818877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033456078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018717224","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt017","title":"Metropolitan Governance in the Federalist Americas: Strategies for Equitable and Integrated Development, edited by Peter K. Spink, Peter M. Ward, and Robert H. Wilson.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Metropolitan area; Federalism; Decentralization; Public administration; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Democratization; State (computer science); Multi-level governance; Democracy; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029379516194055866,"score_gpt":0.3199699283303993,"score_spread":0.2905904121363434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018717224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8731789,0.011012944,0.003570796,0.08670672,0.00075554155,0.0012483353,0.000037110236,0.000027520344,0.023462161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568856,0.0009320958,0.0010036693,0.001353332,0.00022991025,0.000038465387,0.0000028667307,0.0000079665915,0.000743129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997968,0.00038845185,0.00045860768,0.00015488127,0.0005224905,0.0005075751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816245,0.0007017682,0.00038154918,0.00009662873,0.00055848295,0.00009915081],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845536,0.00019000778,0.00031472664,0.0000738094,0.0013705688,0.0014197004,0.00045280322,0.000047243455,0.000043770633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005193079,0.00010396307,0.00005767746,0.00028877938,0.0009200298,0.001687913,0.0001037762,0.0002999941,0.0000027889273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002072401,0.00022540854,0.009112342,0.000055163317,0.00039726045,0.000011712829,0.06452664,0.0000141717655,0.0008533647,0.19025566,0.72740203,0.006938987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010790356,0.00020755916,0.06045774,0.00014526861,0.00005782569,0.00007743773,0.09782345,0.00005815897,0.000060971215,0.012552815,0.8270922,0.00038758028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069871694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006134091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17770284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028399317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042570042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019199818","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq035","title":"Citizen Attitudes Toward Issues of Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Distribution (mathematics); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Law","score_opus":0.018656398062719567,"score_gpt":0.28449136675261194,"score_spread":0.26583496868989237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019199818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87410784,0.0006320197,0.000010342189,0.12220096,0.0005120582,0.00013831985,0.000016210024,0.0000039656843,0.0023782745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639034,0.0006946453,0.000036182737,0.0018870851,0.00030448663,0.0000022862127,8.845849e-7,0.0000076120496,0.00067646056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977427,0.0005564958,0.0005348165,0.00007971112,0.00072216877,0.00036410036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980811,0.00083878014,0.000463059,0.00013981047,0.00030859956,0.00016866256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029543182,0.000113530376,0.00034682718,0.000063940424,0.00038599558,0.00025117458,0.0005695613,0.000053588297,0.000048534494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091162574,0.000058744165,0.00006429695,0.000239858,0.0005574667,0.00026914754,0.00006473221,0.00046193137,5.619133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032422,0.00010554293,0.07739928,0.000078083365,0.00023735066,0.000044044693,0.058268856,0.00012532523,0.00031284222,0.79541075,0.06594792,0.0017457764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027644471,0.00006759406,0.49689737,0.00019043392,0.000058648104,0.000088528155,0.011171796,0.00020727649,0.0003573096,0.04113526,0.4467362,0.00032514273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99138975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7542755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013102975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007656069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2968805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019516307","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjj013","title":"New Trends in Canadian Federalism, 2d ed., edited by Frances Rocher and Miram Smith, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2003, 399 pp., $37.95 paper","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Federalism; Art; Economic history; Humanities; Political science; Art history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012621803731050624,"score_gpt":0.25999918819464124,"score_spread":0.24737738446359062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019516307","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13644743,0.21356569,0.000018395182,0.5888367,0.0028912623,0.00066810305,0.00030404425,0.000049713963,0.057218626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63600653,0.0775982,0.0013105865,0.06873592,0.009834439,0.000026079038,0.000025479227,0.00012899478,0.20633377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997024,0.00035469688,0.0006436123,0.00024098525,0.0006975911,0.0010390887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779886,0.0001138323,0.00047437614,0.00023466167,0.00021575284,0.0011624872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012335157,0.00028393226,0.00044076736,0.000078765406,0.0008104992,0.00094759616,0.0007337233,0.00021512153,0.0011156338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002497393,0.00022498528,0.00012514573,0.00058043003,0.00021693262,0.001873987,0.000037150017,0.00073922373,0.0000086937525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002912162,0.000026585487,0.000969065,0.0000053386048,0.000046616144,0.000018277051,0.011552836,0.000015595067,0.000010765814,0.000887695,0.9532876,0.033150483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000797296,0.000048074893,0.02434528,0.000080415084,0.00003552676,0.00005368193,0.00026236178,0.000011001666,0.000011708751,0.0002763472,0.97380054,0.0002777787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99507487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52010083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009841257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002834477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025608131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr040","title":"Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Historical institutionalism; Scope (computer science); Institutionalism; New institutionalism; Politics; Political science; Institutional theory; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.025120645682214837,"score_gpt":0.22886531440312918,"score_spread":0.20374466872091435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025608131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92949104,0.0032676985,0.00004189361,0.046981294,0.0008634084,0.00015213227,0.000005230026,0.0000035909616,0.019193716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734014,0.0004953893,0.000035615125,0.0008409357,0.00021924294,0.0000019852337,5.7118427e-8,0.0000036644092,0.0010629452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831605,0.0004094302,0.00044992933,0.000065902546,0.00052978523,0.00022887425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889404,0.000366633,0.00036135296,0.00008551488,0.0001652338,0.00012721446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139797,0.00008330416,0.00026944067,0.000035893314,0.00043947937,0.00007912601,0.00027763456,0.000049088147,0.0000144405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052899815,0.000044353652,0.000044105094,0.00008989943,0.0005894247,0.0003001466,0.000053754895,0.00023829837,1.304694e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007698617,0.000023622306,0.003095618,0.000011794006,0.000026491114,0.000011757359,0.014334422,9.439681e-7,0.000006883784,0.9744841,0.0076584956,0.0002689121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016798695,0.00004890901,0.33278084,0.0000756493,0.00004524532,0.00016194256,0.0019231274,0.0000133097265,0.000017382568,0.07061733,0.5924576,0.00017878466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97044706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76611674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90386677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003064062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000655335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33801645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033313409","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs041","title":"A Little Help from My Friends: The Partisan Factor and Intergovernmental Negotiations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Explanatory power; Political science; State (computer science); Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019295896397905868,"score_gpt":0.2545251382291095,"score_spread":0.23522924183120364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033313409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709374,0.0011726483,0.000024490195,0.023725118,0.00078426534,0.00007302828,0.00005428625,0.0000020996597,0.0032266956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.00009525266,0.000009987659,0.0010059127,0.00066968054,0.0000019521813,3.2511383e-7,0.000004034601,0.00027018817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985774,0.00029368384,0.00026619443,0.00004472228,0.0004992919,0.00031871977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901557,0.00045793861,0.00022301836,0.000081432765,0.00003549527,0.00018656913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006051823,0.000065056694,0.00012258915,0.000011196522,0.00032317158,0.00014721778,0.0002627475,0.000025479054,0.00012765072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028557252,0.000034916233,0.00003398836,0.00008489196,0.00009047481,0.00049745414,0.00004614568,0.00019512627,0.000002046592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041791784,0.000112397276,0.7838021,0.000005974667,0.00013262861,0.000008590033,0.081991136,0.0000051602124,0.00013662153,0.08435246,0.04497655,0.004434592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021933291,0.000012076412,0.73061115,0.000027752938,0.000013770342,0.000010107868,0.01505727,0.000011736462,0.0000445243,0.0009929042,0.2529263,0.000073113224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96786594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96060795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20794974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005713745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042847928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24856071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033865671","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs021","title":"Federalism, Decentralization, and Reproductive Rights in Argentina and Chile","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Unitary state; Opposition (politics); Autonomy; Political science; Cooperative federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025869796519797376,"score_gpt":0.3057559082121908,"score_spread":0.2798861116923934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033865671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97606546,0.0014260847,0.00007526192,0.016776508,0.00058416044,0.00014114937,0.000001170556,0.0000057077364,0.004924476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979169,0.0005981613,0.00011245198,0.00022505595,0.0006624557,0.000001164944,0.0000011136,0.000004535209,0.00047820673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870116,0.0003708395,0.0002663634,0.000082095496,0.00028424722,0.00029528816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999278,0.00008388013,0.00021776794,0.00008191485,0.00017550384,0.00016295108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018441051,0.000071426344,0.00012218769,0.000095205476,0.00063158624,0.00023564824,0.0001052693,0.00004417169,0.000025999283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022082738,0.00004645942,0.00002670645,0.00014837574,0.00015382373,0.000742423,0.00003298987,0.00013347673,9.2073805e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058700298,0.00029251285,0.25299898,0.000023569415,0.00011284975,0.000007428166,0.2607845,0.000035852296,0.0003557555,0.46671733,0.01704206,0.0015704578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010798075,0.00004805811,0.74805945,0.000038802293,0.00007248839,0.00022890652,0.015310221,0.000025782418,0.0007920991,0.08324077,0.15084378,0.00025983906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031659694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081008935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49506047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004368807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053604716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48577145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036253132","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl002","title":"Canadian Abortion Policy: National Policy and the Impact of Federalism and Political Implementation on Access to Services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Federalism; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Health services; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.01907550293836379,"score_gpt":0.394498132722935,"score_spread":0.3754226297845712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036253132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73222977,0.000115495386,0.000017053915,0.26583204,0.00004718715,0.00034548462,0.000023295806,0.0000032292762,0.0013864189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908615,0.000070001995,0.000026895581,0.008695568,0.0020196151,0.0000067477436,0.000014033914,0.000010318812,0.00007064892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847096,0.00018329978,0.00046482353,0.00011196363,0.00043640635,0.00033253778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984151,0.0001325514,0.00030205213,0.00011442871,0.00068902085,0.0003468432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011918137,0.00012132317,0.00024329126,0.0004952122,0.000307813,0.00023013593,0.00011280017,0.000043804856,0.00001658359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022383523,0.00006354266,0.00007540613,0.00027606712,0.00008177554,0.00038859242,0.000023373384,0.00018980079,8.5613897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010731758,0.00051987055,0.184722,0.00042295648,0.0009794728,0.000023696964,0.008970456,0.00074599433,0.006085413,0.6971661,0.04221837,0.047413908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023792128,0.00033243315,0.9775863,0.00004090889,0.000047168596,0.0003757029,0.00027824016,0.000078109166,0.00018760636,0.017645782,0.0009859547,0.00006253568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57956916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04431573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7928643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059881085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014489385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044773446","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq007","title":"Federal-State Tax Interactions in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; State income tax; Tax competition; Endogeneity; State (computer science); Indirect tax; Competition (biology); Income tax; Public economics; Gross income; Tax reform; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01384854515950976,"score_gpt":0.27054339799189125,"score_spread":0.25669485283238147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044773446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92531097,0.000035669545,0.00014061083,0.072289765,0.00061297143,0.0000895043,0.0000053931662,0.0000031518325,0.0015119765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451685,0.0007710965,0.000026138912,0.0038003095,0.00014555447,0.0000014027208,0.0000027931585,0.000003926012,0.00073190633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987752,0.00026300098,0.00024018085,0.000047691374,0.0004776655,0.00019626967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915713,0.00032862579,0.00022574312,0.00007839363,0.0001454866,0.00006462116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012135142,0.00006300477,0.00008574348,0.000052295163,0.00061559555,0.00040546944,0.00028050417,0.000018177185,0.000044339547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029708477,0.00003430009,0.00002222512,0.00024727886,0.000102418104,0.00044357934,0.000019004967,0.00037310552,6.3675935e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022262722,0.00028866756,0.12905814,0.000017886465,0.00010834116,0.00010353653,0.13443838,0.001332056,0.000494799,0.055386554,0.66805005,0.0104989875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040741963,0.000026525104,0.073905036,0.000018611096,0.000014038849,0.00005507205,0.017339304,0.00027267364,0.000060576207,0.0070571015,0.90073633,0.000107287655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84701097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23268633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008895257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031979752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47347257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045098566","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt030","title":"The Question of Federalism in Nepal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Unitary state; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Nepali; Dual federalism; New Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Ethnic group; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01610185448587914,"score_gpt":0.3013066334009589,"score_spread":0.2852047789150798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045098566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87110287,0.00085436547,0.00008115584,0.10472031,0.0010259612,0.00025102936,0.0000024407796,0.000008197422,0.02195368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957977,0.0003809768,0.00004436893,0.0005622851,0.0005772682,0.0000046221476,1.4102083e-7,0.0000061833266,0.0026264458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975771,0.00074392196,0.00057615805,0.00006046366,0.0006651287,0.00037727124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982237,0.000587189,0.0005472608,0.0001389243,0.00036921757,0.00013370527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003460442,0.00008421822,0.00020136831,0.00004132706,0.00058674737,0.00038698918,0.00056118297,0.00006358019,0.000044298315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010565775,0.000042879412,0.00010210042,0.0001935653,0.00027935742,0.0006366341,0.000038946775,0.00028715306,0.000012846623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048115693,0.00010357048,0.0063896887,0.000015171572,0.000051494146,0.0000065537083,0.010225226,0.000025702131,0.00041592232,0.9080412,0.059072748,0.015604619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084481854,0.0001378106,0.38190287,0.00020659335,0.000023755532,0.000054067106,0.0038073186,0.00012464613,0.00016414943,0.10712282,0.5053912,0.00021994949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09842151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010733997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80091834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013495988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002014861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90758216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051020871","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp030","title":"Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Law; History; Decentralization","score_opus":0.013513490579879136,"score_gpt":0.2681913515043193,"score_spread":0.2546778609244401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051020871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8130738,0.00059479114,0.0005039613,0.18021044,0.0002890546,0.00016413437,0.0000063840894,0.000003994777,0.0051534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945282,0.0008591291,0.000018692968,0.003999199,0.00026835332,3.478062e-7,9.162596e-7,0.00000360421,0.00032161182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983086,0.00030986915,0.00040333183,0.00005214015,0.0006755865,0.00025049126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916995,0.00017594695,0.00036515715,0.00008657938,0.00012457119,0.0000778033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009797524,0.00007264111,0.00015268428,0.000054549273,0.00039512987,0.00012686542,0.00026339578,0.00004000586,0.000012231116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044560918,0.00004249148,0.000032721102,0.0003225377,0.0000981918,0.00033379334,0.000019246501,0.00013478035,1.6114677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007458907,0.00010085883,0.030926963,0.000013865324,0.000032526783,0.000011850523,0.03308855,0.0008694251,0.00015388164,0.88551056,0.039111033,0.010105883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020400013,0.00025997136,0.66200703,0.00017126695,0.00007725378,0.0000711694,0.023279892,0.0008762766,0.00084497477,0.1470963,0.1628717,0.00040416303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69986737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6531047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7384143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042970915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3532252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052118429","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs034","title":"Federal Supremacy and the Occupied Field: A Comparative Critique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Field (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036846473513787864,"score_gpt":0.35761074975069707,"score_spread":0.3207642762369092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052118429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36736873,0.0035257288,0.0015759786,0.22655442,0.001364845,0.00033134338,0.000009164155,0.000020628906,0.39924917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893647,0.00022422473,0.00015310748,0.007888364,0.0011424035,0.000002215978,3.758991e-7,0.000003040179,0.0012216023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820393,0.0008446528,0.00025398016,0.00004051417,0.00034815512,0.00030874772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974695,0.0018039638,0.00021485121,0.00008227801,0.00025030045,0.00017911631],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022978205,0.000084326326,0.00020509968,0.00003252732,0.001365408,0.00026762995,0.0002839457,0.000040452098,0.00010130975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005337378,0.000042404175,0.000087089116,0.00009585393,0.0011978478,0.000560342,0.000042482105,0.00030757269,0.000004191986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009427026,0.000022816641,0.0012073729,0.0000017142704,0.00004422013,0.0000010539065,0.01670603,0.0000016347491,0.000005307064,0.956869,0.024849333,0.00019722558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011831768,0.000065681874,0.004558481,0.000024718116,0.0000822065,0.00025467481,0.019154212,0.000011133173,0.00005839478,0.012894203,0.9615516,0.00016148342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032714084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041324538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041662464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047299996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055423297","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005037","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism and Federal Political Culture in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Public opinion; Political science; Political culture; Public administration; Law; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028200119052069716,"score_gpt":0.2700931987013161,"score_spread":0.2418930796492464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055423297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4552462,0.0025172485,0.00006060308,0.5341121,0.0007451505,0.00032752342,0.000030136469,0.000011653497,0.0069494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848876,0.001136504,0.000019323916,0.013161453,0.00046182977,0.0000040250375,0.0000035648773,0.00001142317,0.00031427768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969011,0.00078564783,0.0005224126,0.00014484562,0.0008714952,0.0007745228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834293,0.0004826074,0.00029523307,0.00013968138,0.00024008917,0.0004994804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002058836,0.00018323024,0.00034494227,0.00007219233,0.0010987802,0.00081963406,0.0003976986,0.00009753978,0.000011924191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087116024,0.00009534776,0.000061240746,0.0003031213,0.0005444084,0.00044099678,0.00006515089,0.00062805094,0.0000010070955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009401089,0.00003748158,0.0018947306,0.0000083827945,0.000034345572,0.000018279157,0.004474573,0.00008039807,0.0000016886701,0.9810607,0.012079488,0.00021595093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007899609,0.00020785842,0.071227595,0.00031110054,0.000024776342,0.00039694656,0.013877443,0.0001403359,0.000021124073,0.19051217,0.7149078,0.00047324755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7905485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010316867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015129644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.845104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057117391","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs015","title":"Federalism and the \"New Politics\" of Welfare Development: Childcare and Parental Leave in Australia and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Welfare; Politics; Parental leave; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.022749588398463663,"score_gpt":0.2869332547827435,"score_spread":0.26418366638427987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057117391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151011,0.0022259273,5.3235567e-7,0.08096777,0.00032658977,0.00013166986,0.0000058074306,0.0000024261185,0.0012381468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757415,0.0007324518,0.000026992564,0.00051477936,0.0005657937,0.0000012545918,5.431027e-7,0.000005453592,0.0005785845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860835,0.0002534308,0.00035060296,0.00005827654,0.00036344695,0.00036587237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921465,0.00018857823,0.0002610648,0.00005058295,0.0000879767,0.0001971211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011299268,0.00011458965,0.00026979347,0.000052337113,0.0013349956,0.00011848074,0.00015933761,0.000060610117,0.0000070896617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002310018,0.000059548856,0.000032122298,0.00009347725,0.0005747002,0.0003127262,0.00009073711,0.00023351007,8.991242e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001373224,0.000059089594,0.28331757,0.000067713714,0.00038450726,0.000006935222,0.46277925,0.000001432254,0.000008368613,0.23437649,0.014435142,0.004426187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017894993,0.00002345386,0.8852798,0.00006791545,0.00006133214,0.000084371335,0.07797252,6.600529e-7,0.000052796968,0.009624023,0.024856662,0.00018702088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7509692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6849493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6019622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009554926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031869917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063366292","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq025","title":"Federalism and Public Responsiveness to Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04198669779011627,"score_gpt":0.3619078820260473,"score_spread":0.319921184235931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063366292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283364,0.000046548037,0.00007480113,0.26656815,0.00065072655,0.00013369219,0.0000019670101,0.000013108907,0.004174638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931652,0.000016832144,0.00010669878,0.0031018099,0.0021178864,0.000004384174,3.7243365e-7,0.0000106371435,0.0014761927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785626,0.00067237194,0.00038204485,0.00008874205,0.00051838084,0.0004822152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979362,0.00046996988,0.00021621515,0.00015201834,0.000632831,0.0005927502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031254739,0.00010085737,0.00019666263,0.0002850781,0.0010492267,0.00081786193,0.00036368798,0.00009720087,0.00007341746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003479412,0.00006589614,0.00006424743,0.0005433614,0.00020402108,0.00060068525,0.00005321241,0.00037692633,0.000015005389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089968315,0.00006365749,0.0074230633,0.00000943155,0.00004037204,0.000007373347,0.010875733,0.0000032051005,0.007648816,0.9517078,0.014725956,0.007404653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043406,0.00021025121,0.073530495,0.00003105335,0.00003112037,0.00012855673,0.0016316086,0.00001048058,0.00040987998,0.045834664,0.8774162,0.0002613595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014113861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015780196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008144073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006139282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99245125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067705368","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq044","title":"Diversity and Unity in Federal Countries, edited by Luis Moreno and Cesar Colino.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Socioeconomic status; Citizenship; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Ideology; Identity (music); Sociology; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.032566268190518284,"score_gpt":0.25056204721253406,"score_spread":0.21799577902201578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067705368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860336,0.00084012136,0.000017301147,0.006188059,0.00035011134,0.0000993476,0.000020021605,0.0000067111073,0.0064447275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727565,0.00086916564,0.00001831278,0.0008534859,0.00026077215,5.2305705e-7,3.2288742e-7,0.000003925496,0.00071783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859667,0.00033347035,0.0002596425,0.000080181846,0.00042013763,0.0003098794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990921,0.0001828019,0.00024848187,0.00006766219,0.00017543964,0.0002335173],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017126946,0.00008903776,0.00020631992,0.000042155123,0.002052928,0.00013527765,0.0002621174,0.000079515165,0.000035449033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031003277,0.00006106172,0.000028954042,0.0001251624,0.0004028409,0.0005435488,0.00026244545,0.00025410161,8.3216185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026153942,0.00017577111,0.7050734,0.000035657533,0.00008812071,0.00005103878,0.11669204,3.8338135e-7,0.000027298107,0.10820579,0.0688607,0.0005282687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013966995,0.00014362331,0.75122494,0.000070671,0.000030939915,0.00005611733,0.003411616,0.000016426513,0.000042344513,0.016166955,0.22720198,0.0002376942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14579171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011759264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15834129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009947589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001031779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073159803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs036","title":"(Sub)national Economic Union: Institutions, Ideas, and Internal Trade Policy in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Economic union; Trade union; Commercial policy; Public administration; Economic history; Law; International trade; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.024599619881162275,"score_gpt":0.28916455628630816,"score_spread":0.2645649364051459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073159803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67581487,0.0011711684,0.000015455837,0.3056801,0.00080758275,0.0000711585,0.00006540466,0.0000025315392,0.016371762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193466,0.0005370499,0.000011300116,0.0056831283,0.0015758936,8.1429386e-7,4.848926e-7,0.0000034827412,0.0002531733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989413,0.0001994131,0.00025660367,0.000040874034,0.00028507682,0.0002767559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.00010740502,0.00021488256,0.00004563719,0.000028753819,0.00024555734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013220696,0.00006230943,0.00010673338,0.000114098206,0.00029211715,0.00009919021,0.00023710697,0.000029319546,0.000030622905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028660506,0.000049997652,0.000029851324,0.00012205909,0.00012459279,0.00076561375,0.000020182302,0.00020423761,0.0000014949495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022315642,0.000025980122,0.023257935,0.0000052873143,0.000041835694,0.000008968702,0.0073357457,0.00018616368,0.000013778703,0.5973996,0.36456406,0.007138358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002873991,0.000006669483,0.25421125,0.000019304813,0.0000051553216,0.00011831727,0.00066468626,0.000011925578,0.000011580793,0.0034793946,0.741105,0.00007928339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98674697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99549115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022110632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076964973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079486721","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv016","title":"Negotiating Territorial Change in Multinational States: Party Preferences, Negotiating Power and the Role of the Negotiation Mode","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Power (physics); Mode (computer interface); Political science; Economic geography; Space (punctuation); Economic system; Political economy; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.030500101807151216,"score_gpt":0.2969719739030321,"score_spread":0.26647187209588086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079486721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974021,0.0018476258,0.00008146515,0.017314566,0.0026013642,0.00045549436,0.000024451443,0.0000068591935,0.003647128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982666,0.000074428666,0.000032196192,0.00022593189,0.0013219939,0.000008459967,7.050134e-7,0.000005583966,0.00006413571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722296,0.001054063,0.0005110339,0.00007597078,0.0008706749,0.00026526925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978883,0.0007205586,0.00080639095,0.000104963234,0.00037925888,0.00010049556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035067333,0.000090556,0.00020214464,0.00003321542,0.00037800396,0.0002805229,0.00041792722,0.0000639218,0.0000054882366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021326244,0.000042277108,0.00005903182,0.00017672904,0.00026272508,0.00071232073,0.00008364871,0.00028815967,4.0212706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027499124,0.00015002795,0.101539984,0.000016166887,0.00007488254,0.0000010981461,0.2803753,0.0033325872,0.000048199756,0.6076439,0.0025851415,0.0039577223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009821059,0.00025156763,0.46734267,0.0005215073,0.00012343102,0.000044361735,0.08159373,0.06809794,0.000077958226,0.20729768,0.16426389,0.00056421914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103498764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060037975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40034622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013721897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026145892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081028403","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju039","title":"From Calgary to Canberra: Resource Taxation and Fiscal Federalism in Canada and Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Politics; Revenue; Incentive; Fiscal federalism; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Finance; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.01829936736056144,"score_gpt":0.2613873447796973,"score_spread":0.24308797741913585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081028403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956558,0.0001246318,0.00007036944,0.040497504,0.0003191459,0.00010045632,0.0000110583205,0.0000031214972,0.0023157399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995592,0.000022383781,0.00007107105,0.0021399036,0.00064479857,0.0000017637868,7.6616135e-7,0.0000060133675,0.0015212932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982414,0.0004662981,0.00035641616,0.00010981109,0.0004944912,0.0003315403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879247,0.00037244376,0.00031992426,0.00009113976,0.000067034714,0.00035697198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001260536,0.000097371034,0.00022337241,0.00003911735,0.00027311867,0.0002504755,0.00021225048,0.000058117745,0.000021954822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083181006,0.00006770371,0.000023238828,0.0001123492,0.000082304585,0.0002463966,0.00004728874,0.00024049585,0.0000010314523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025824088,0.00007843588,0.32650164,0.00004604138,0.00012181775,0.000090646245,0.065647475,0.00012242774,0.00048615632,0.13753726,0.44793066,0.021179227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039724822,0.000034575893,0.6665108,0.00006997967,0.000012421211,0.000021166099,0.0014059864,0.00005979159,0.000015958336,0.0038886613,0.32745087,0.0001325096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99781847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3400092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034659202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030288674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27608773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085912979","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji006","title":"Book Reviews: Legacy and New Directions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Library science; Political science; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03767819155314047,"score_gpt":0.3208671285821168,"score_spread":0.28318893702897635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085912979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034683815,0.13275278,0.0009996818,0.4318277,0.00088904,0.00019015667,0.0000032257262,0.000025337196,0.42984372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57451963,0.11755291,0.0032890672,0.07291626,0.013147182,0.000003517608,0.0000012238105,0.000019107669,0.21855108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990743,0.00023260918,0.00025229919,0.000041523665,0.00022797611,0.0001713097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919236,0.00019366729,0.00021664645,0.00006717615,0.0001201119,0.00021003069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009678506,0.000059290727,0.00013890403,0.000043999367,0.0007826555,0.00023592362,0.0001792847,0.000026352529,0.00037229157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038734736,0.000037682854,0.00006862888,0.00011007072,0.00035499063,0.0009206238,0.000018438659,0.00017136717,0.00001608928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004903573,0.000013978485,0.000050590697,0.0000013652741,0.000016532833,9.658613e-7,0.0016784872,0.0000037975722,0.000005662328,0.35838124,0.62104946,0.018792994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009574236,0.00001554069,0.00023332014,0.000016426384,0.000028620274,0.00007423274,0.00035516426,0.0000010685561,0.000004058169,0.0006789159,0.9984483,0.000048572296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017286274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056379824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5710513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086130184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6019633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087785354","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt040","title":"The Quest for a Political Settlement in Cyprus: Is a Dyadic Federation Viable?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Turkish; Political science; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Intermediary; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02113584943691246,"score_gpt":0.3076990027358404,"score_spread":0.28656315329892795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087785354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2006137,0.00090592797,0.00097354525,0.7663205,0.0014129662,0.0012779367,0.00003632521,0.00001763207,0.028441453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144554,0.00008988347,0.00008896607,0.0048717116,0.00083400006,0.00004206449,6.085242e-7,0.000008546733,0.0026186763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977818,0.0003730054,0.0005358261,0.000084744475,0.00056580413,0.0006587909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817944,0.00082266255,0.0002837086,0.00012715858,0.00036163893,0.00022539447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029786194,0.00009485,0.00017700261,0.000036200054,0.0011188932,0.0009985659,0.0004258603,0.00006664616,0.0000786898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010197763,0.00004970136,0.00010539803,0.00012565307,0.00018004968,0.0005796455,0.000030619914,0.00021329352,0.00001792369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001925691,0.00004877472,0.0008496873,0.000008072682,0.000025320038,0.0000011334959,0.0029779614,0.00000246537,0.00003691322,0.9019984,0.092859924,0.001172071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000675622,0.000119594486,0.013821218,0.00007085007,0.000018348339,0.000020426733,0.0035486848,0.00030413183,0.000073070914,0.13323787,0.8479758,0.0001344125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029569136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79083186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003521184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032492218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97689307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088511019","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq011","title":"Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Business; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.012149030339278272,"score_gpt":0.26633103379495027,"score_spread":0.254182003455672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088511019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963487,0.00015269463,0.000006520787,0.035229612,0.00026502015,0.00014350282,0.000005606758,0.0000021856495,0.0007078063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989829,0.00009451889,0.000003124442,0.0005616205,0.000119703334,0.0000034029713,4.3629362e-7,0.0000039758024,0.00023032381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986466,0.0002915148,0.00035769003,0.000057639227,0.00040728823,0.00023926466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987989,0.0006790448,0.00027978362,0.000050679642,0.00009944376,0.000092146816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015142461,0.00007821929,0.00023086405,0.00006803497,0.00026735538,0.00038210032,0.00021235779,0.00002795422,0.0000016614354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011321167,0.000041288597,0.000014282028,0.00022326635,0.0002021366,0.00034085606,0.000049251943,0.00029528898,7.9033065e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077512945,0.000028634415,0.874359,0.0000454014,0.000028090832,0.000007756246,0.012400624,0.00006297731,0.000012808616,0.11206469,0.00071309716,0.000199389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030648592,0.000030017816,0.9464321,0.00019204666,0.000010876389,0.00009045582,0.030475648,0.0014895961,0.000011671541,0.005096825,0.01292087,0.00018501664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99506384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10696786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003951519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007067214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3684602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089444739","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004996","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States in 2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Public opinion; Political science; Library science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.036488604183864105,"score_gpt":0.268670089023311,"score_spread":0.23218148483944692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089444739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73805016,0.0019290159,0.000029291747,0.23509382,0.0014075228,0.00039264854,0.000012720963,0.000006235959,0.023078576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920044,0.001306289,0.000009436498,0.0060570547,0.00012754736,0.0000047911417,0.0000011438582,0.000008099932,0.00048125727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962836,0.0018642369,0.0005254038,0.000099153054,0.0007048424,0.0005227879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982988,0.0007802601,0.00033895258,0.00013076706,0.00025091783,0.00020025365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600416,0.00012348648,0.0002775991,0.00012512488,0.00046947264,0.00038706363,0.00037449496,0.000057055335,0.000033845965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002512532,0.0000664059,0.000036476493,0.0007462538,0.00023156003,0.0003501171,0.000024029232,0.0004603411,0.000001206805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297339,0.000048308986,0.013136272,0.0000061986666,0.00002339587,0.000016726877,0.0058825957,0.00017219914,0.0000013621963,0.94809467,0.032085072,0.00046025342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023763257,0.000040606505,0.06252852,0.000105549145,0.0000048195834,0.000041075018,0.0055389632,0.0001987051,0.000011122079,0.022325862,0.90665567,0.00017275919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97497237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067019317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015764658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37324634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100922201","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq001","title":"Federalism and Representation in the Theory of the Founding Fathers: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Canadian Constitutional Thought","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Representation (politics); Sovereignty; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Conversation; Political philosophy; Dual federalism; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0582398632575388,"score_gpt":0.3466941844176328,"score_spread":0.28845432116009395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100922201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638099,0.00014269765,0.00004031028,0.009332909,0.00034289688,0.00027453,0.000011704097,0.0000013709488,0.026043646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918634,0.000030725016,0.000052678908,0.00044606026,0.0001770385,0.0000023930297,4.1657438e-7,0.0000018479226,0.000102480335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803,0.0010147741,0.00031903762,0.00006404208,0.00041591335,0.0001562323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815106,0.0010422923,0.00036993227,0.00011176791,0.00024599998,0.000078958365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026863152,0.000072546914,0.00017788103,0.00008437455,0.0009060694,0.00013055127,0.00032604818,0.00003836025,0.000018842977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044481806,0.000036739322,0.000041396714,0.00022140505,0.0027380614,0.00028175433,0.000031237105,0.00032672912,1.2355231e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000217603,0.000047716454,0.020293059,0.000001914094,0.000037150032,0.0000019653444,0.04429563,0.000018942994,0.000052280535,0.93480057,0.00029728658,0.00013175234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020573305,0.00025802417,0.32370156,0.00010167484,0.00022327028,0.00039831994,0.53120595,0.00004390717,0.000080046186,0.0745277,0.0671324,0.00026983226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073382795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21866587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8602728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041053176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011836591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104635029","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr053","title":"Beyond Decentralization--The Comparative Study of Interdependence in Federal Systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048700573372547934,"score_gpt":0.3416385983432719,"score_spread":0.29293802497072396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104635029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868483,0.0011867079,0.00016757639,0.0026546374,0.001328098,0.0003862966,0.0000033045753,0.0000042720185,0.007420801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880934,0.000051110906,0.000006120891,0.00013597077,0.00049349305,0.000004887316,1.674097e-7,0.0000048268453,0.00049410784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.0013936834,0.00065675704,0.000059627473,0.00080347375,0.00040303657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824667,0.00050165126,0.00067159696,0.00013593498,0.00029708614,0.00014707202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037264258,0.00009616178,0.00030171414,0.000052325333,0.0004278735,0.00021551429,0.0005918377,0.000044387645,0.000025033742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003349424,0.000051261177,0.000059782808,0.0002878244,0.0001695645,0.0007516357,0.000052328676,0.00025619514,0.0000037535756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010776189,0.0011219449,0.3270843,0.000025690437,0.00016324391,0.0000064445703,0.35360727,0.00052496744,0.000061551895,0.3033198,0.013738991,0.00023802921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022146415,0.00043477214,0.70191795,0.0002811266,0.0000748032,0.0001092671,0.22774841,0.00021097966,0.000082045,0.0032136103,0.06335825,0.00035413128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030826043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010984582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37483367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016325629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012955412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118577803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq027","title":"Federalism and Economic Growth: The Importance of Context in Nigerian Public Finance Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public finance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.014415850813404612,"score_gpt":0.25621464657819976,"score_spread":0.24179879576479515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118577803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047791,0.00058438216,0.000034342003,0.0866999,0.00074965134,0.00016600668,0.000005149884,0.0000053541353,0.006976146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579334,0.0018747746,0.000042659078,0.0016768659,0.00028547613,0.0000032297926,8.4794556e-7,0.00000856986,0.00031422908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998419,0.00018212854,0.00059129193,0.0001048834,0.00039074814,0.0003119534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861383,0.00016987682,0.0007732679,0.00018155584,0.00018334776,0.00007812584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026587616,0.000110899135,0.00023937154,0.00006456616,0.0004975061,0.00032013046,0.0005592081,0.000095248055,0.00006784386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038149845,0.00006429774,0.00007415114,0.00018931013,0.00040406562,0.001118405,0.000056215034,0.0003683086,0.0000023747414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011805957,0.00009797007,0.18023893,0.000013369666,0.000040643044,0.00000843858,0.015875336,0.000011587911,0.00022339534,0.782523,0.0112709515,0.009578328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029433337,0.00021592143,0.5601956,0.00010082785,0.00004664934,0.00013262189,0.018090973,0.00035059857,0.00073222397,0.061786663,0.3548874,0.0005171689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004677172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04337805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018521685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003275802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9740778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123513496","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004947","title":"Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018815603367121268,"score_gpt":0.24516744862610176,"score_spread":0.2263518452589805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123513496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80554456,0.0020115445,0.000049428043,0.12518267,0.0014042535,0.00027891487,0.000054132186,0.000004131088,0.065470375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630237,0.00033810668,0.000019754163,0.0007000707,0.00020091915,0.0000026587982,1.5037689e-7,0.000004933822,0.0024310448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771553,0.0005140176,0.0005554741,0.00006307139,0.00087242416,0.00027948865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998539,0.00042856994,0.0005778582,0.00011925877,0.00023074701,0.00010459435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011132085,0.00008351277,0.00019481471,0.000026233201,0.00046991228,0.000078930265,0.0005256419,0.00003504756,0.00044842358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063926366,0.000047039757,0.000061863546,0.00038652433,0.0001892015,0.00038437513,0.000042492215,0.00027180323,0.0000033852386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005117318,0.00015419617,0.027234329,0.000011670787,0.0001397945,0.000030735446,0.072238185,0.00026338364,0.00019585964,0.37129915,0.52676183,0.001619671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012833225,0.0001510877,0.22836721,0.00025778954,0.0000643286,0.000067110646,0.075781785,0.00049714034,0.00028225794,0.007105884,0.685753,0.00038909333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92225903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36419326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064071314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078529125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49099237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139040101","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq006","title":"A Two-Way Street: Federalism and Women's Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Arrow; Dual federalism; Suffrage; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.006651919003951761,"score_gpt":0.2127242906699705,"score_spread":0.20607237166601874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139040101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524587,0.00029782404,0.0000011604174,0.045114756,0.00053531706,0.00009083894,0.000013122577,0.000003319701,0.0014849869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994129,0.0008225859,0.000014695514,0.0036654228,0.00027910556,0.0000022291401,0.0000011424822,0.000007547951,0.0010782517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985121,0.00037204343,0.0002857569,0.00006996436,0.00039442955,0.00036571658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874145,0.0004739058,0.00021664303,0.000108336055,0.00016608764,0.00029359438],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019273524,0.00008473442,0.00018941532,0.00028633006,0.0014789029,0.0010401672,0.00030587576,0.000040640018,0.00008547877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035756113,0.000058828708,0.000027800254,0.0002496004,0.0008801507,0.00029448365,0.000041992946,0.0005577003,3.9572296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781992,0.00008927144,0.021681193,0.000050473518,0.00025735114,0.00022340736,0.38900816,0.00012885673,0.00007335754,0.48635122,0.094237626,0.007620873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023629067,0.00002869831,0.027085917,0.000022261287,0.000033786768,0.00009230504,0.0611892,0.00009646415,0.0000024509907,0.022253295,0.886631,0.00020167553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007321421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023810158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147452464","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju040","title":"Regions as Primary Political Communities: A Multi-Level Comparative Analysis of Turnout in Regional Elections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Turnout; Salience (neuroscience); Legislature; Political science; Politics; Voting; Democracy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.18623785470354767,"score_gpt":0.40743630702304007,"score_spread":0.2211984523194924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147452464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541646,0.00011687216,0.0025142888,0.029434498,0.00017331712,0.00017095795,0.000011166652,0.0000114855,0.013402805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981956,0.000017761244,0.00015756355,0.0009759089,0.00019176828,0.0000048327056,0.0000064321225,0.0000043449645,0.00044581015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650013,0.001885724,0.0006440836,0.00005871034,0.0005234468,0.00038790103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971825,0.0014723433,0.0003914007,0.00016305568,0.00057948614,0.0002112063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022667088,0.00009524018,0.00044262497,0.00039877143,0.00048482363,0.0000942846,0.00034277374,0.00008024332,0.00005262353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042413038,0.0000669545,0.00020603494,0.00094698335,0.00042533712,0.0003073388,0.000025667598,0.0003737866,0.000003450715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064157626,0.000330027,0.019753108,0.000009987271,0.00042719746,9.593351e-7,0.033288598,0.00031879894,0.000120163866,0.9432875,0.0022885392,0.0001109656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016217199,0.0005094779,0.8798623,0.00020486096,0.0011220351,0.000044080552,0.030555608,0.0034506216,0.000083956205,0.051696174,0.030445023,0.0004041638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06637259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08566123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003311225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9398445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156576814","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp001","title":"Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Normative; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Field (mathematics); Federalism; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07750398033551414,"score_gpt":0.32492325424201685,"score_spread":0.2474192739065027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156576814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89441526,0.027731147,0.00237034,0.06780341,0.0011958685,0.00064601895,0.000015048424,0.00002503921,0.005797894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995597,0.002710377,0.00017423372,0.00038796596,0.00060631696,0.000006070441,1.387615e-7,0.000002488141,0.0005154074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985953,0.00050708844,0.0002703674,0.000064282416,0.00033607302,0.00022689239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992156,0.00028711147,0.0001659301,0.00004696031,0.00013408688,0.00015029404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015981738,0.00007096585,0.00017843151,0.000040089766,0.00075659715,0.00019160467,0.00011949267,0.00005490052,0.0000079328565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036597255,0.000046898607,0.000023093398,0.00009541462,0.00079902064,0.0005924705,0.000022479438,0.00016076634,0.000001464535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029974433,0.000056504912,0.029795544,0.000016286833,0.000025634854,0.00006282337,0.01538549,0.000027797267,0.00001836465,0.94815344,0.005947673,0.00048046187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016484816,0.00023962815,0.48278388,0.00055432314,0.000028843859,0.0030456933,0.0025609622,0.0005299108,0.0000124144335,0.011746637,0.49644107,0.00040815357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05446988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015198304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007961136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015831074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9518265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160152441","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq012","title":"Going Alone or Moving Together: Canadian and American Middle Tier Strategies on Climate Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Political science; Regional science; Geography; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Public relations","score_opus":0.05346229013758931,"score_gpt":0.3193139495873245,"score_spread":0.2658516594497352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160152441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93094116,0.000086184424,0.000009295814,0.04529913,0.0003862752,0.00009325761,0.000005470016,0.000014988271,0.023164224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955011,0.00046733336,0.00010378307,0.0026135007,0.000981705,0.0000021341934,3.3881787e-7,0.00001377039,0.00031635017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986133,0.00029106977,0.00021484762,0.00008050557,0.00030578524,0.00049447594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990501,0.00025911932,0.00015358963,0.000095337346,0.00009369322,0.0003481812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984358,0.00010460775,0.00018714387,0.00017105787,0.0011863995,0.00061638874,0.00029780745,0.000052293013,0.00011005536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023019515,0.00006552193,0.00005108654,0.00020779904,0.00028200433,0.0006499445,0.000015212407,0.0005990264,0.000005935835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056394795,0.00013924927,0.029534103,0.00006694915,0.0002731671,0.00019137812,0.6560588,0.0000509342,0.0029713928,0.10094915,0.005985229,0.20321573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015838521,0.00091353554,0.18105371,0.00031521858,0.00016066525,0.00037208945,0.15264688,0.00016240885,0.00018874323,0.004248032,0.657466,0.0008888399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26843664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70770967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062068575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043759574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91249454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160417104","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju030","title":"Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Rule of law; Electoral reform; Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025121900994839005,"score_gpt":0.2634135380838276,"score_spread":0.2382916370889886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160417104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96587485,0.00019913612,0.00005390611,0.014510393,0.0005018958,0.00007168356,0.000012026802,0.0000040593864,0.01877202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995597,0.00006112087,0.00003110935,0.0006263552,0.0005509522,6.1381746e-7,2.37257e-7,0.000005549547,0.0031270282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824727,0.00027404624,0.00043526027,0.00006623112,0.0006419541,0.00033521853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.00021941515,0.0004883264,0.00011478031,0.00024847893,0.00024440687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872553,0.00009086923,0.00025567674,0.000027612787,0.00041002888,0.00015078852,0.00032682714,0.00005806501,0.00003010069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004394846,0.00005399421,0.00005833566,0.00008335921,0.00017670506,0.00032637885,0.000036578163,0.0001977059,0.0000010250855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011906878,0.000099829784,0.016734503,0.00010948395,0.00017698681,0.000029490557,0.012403682,0.000014427096,0.0010090785,0.8658659,0.09748557,0.005952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076463143,0.00015826775,0.22458944,0.000110728804,0.000035926347,0.00011987563,0.0013119617,0.000027377086,0.0002615863,0.014468847,0.7579287,0.0002226394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92406446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7784088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85139704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019545342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041331543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3153652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165650283","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji028","title":"Electoral Accountability in a Federal System: National and Provincial Economic Voting in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Voting; Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01539428594599356,"score_gpt":0.26788311578862783,"score_spread":0.25248882984263427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165650283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850907,0.00018324953,0.0000043020927,0.009856493,0.00030528466,0.0001297597,0.000011318668,0.0000032558878,0.004415685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998611,0.0000049203577,0.000019898212,0.00035404533,0.00089430367,0.000002630271,2.0044841e-7,0.0000042625807,0.000108756176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982684,0.00031956442,0.0005172123,0.000086454296,0.00046413759,0.00034419243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992183,0.00024757977,0.0002874422,0.00003995965,0.00010275499,0.0001039666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773436,0.00007840843,0.00020632255,0.00004877255,0.00024671707,0.00020605992,0.00022396617,0.000041964035,0.00001767721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000341572,0.000057952584,0.0000306638,0.000086546126,0.000060990504,0.0006201666,0.000027204884,0.00025055656,0.0000015986301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018190802,0.00008568777,0.8057314,0.000067038236,0.000033378346,0.000021983064,0.0063222125,0.0007712593,0.000040522762,0.17345373,0.009695378,0.0035954993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010368874,0.000025902453,0.9616878,0.00011899446,0.0000047866906,0.00008540051,0.0024125746,0.001869714,0.000016649697,0.00053783786,0.03199971,0.00020374286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99137384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17291589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053125033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004367814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167940972","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq008","title":"Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Similarity (geometry); Value (mathematics); Variation (astronomy); Perception; Political science; Positive economics; Variable (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03580295199593247,"score_gpt":0.32716795633381146,"score_spread":0.291365004337879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167940972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7398903,0.00006626855,0.000100353645,0.14941095,0.001408159,0.00010830484,0.000008551863,0.000012084187,0.108995065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989587,0.00014174423,0.00006466012,0.008455081,0.0005458884,0.0000012419487,0.0000021407934,0.0000044626336,0.001197785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868006,0.00038514892,0.00023400034,0.00004941758,0.00042974448,0.00022160495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811697,0.0010910964,0.00023237336,0.00010145945,0.0003113585,0.00014672648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013739704,0.00007745264,0.00014553315,0.000057123598,0.0022685719,0.00033544732,0.00030477686,0.000029516776,0.00003779796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004884773,0.0000402704,0.00004243759,0.00019919038,0.0011416859,0.00014570932,0.000027541279,0.0005445824,8.059232e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048143662,0.000010754662,0.00027687114,9.744849e-7,0.000037246762,0.0000028887632,0.003188928,0.00018939639,0.000008675096,0.9780577,0.01809432,0.00008413814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000461066,0.000021812573,0.0012115801,0.00000965987,0.000033891127,0.00008401914,0.005468713,0.000060768067,0.000009722084,0.007873862,0.9846862,0.000078737925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8969997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9168408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083008854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016523966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168177525","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq013","title":"Comparing Federations: Lessons from Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; State (computer science); New Federalism; Politics; Comparative politics; Public administration; Dual federalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.038002058820972746,"score_gpt":0.29112156950969986,"score_spread":0.2531195106887271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168177525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9044311,0.00023126483,0.00012825389,0.09025033,0.0007654859,0.00008731182,0.000008441375,0.0000067609553,0.0040910183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973152,0.00013549246,0.000040943294,0.0015931946,0.0005719112,0.0000016624728,0.0000022502832,0.000005274591,0.00033403607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984461,0.00039746444,0.00034005038,0.00006364425,0.00048756218,0.00026516485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979785,0.0011751631,0.00033502435,0.00012058872,0.0002203077,0.00017042477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017177825,0.000082875566,0.0002283043,0.00002531556,0.001813996,0.0008043374,0.00041004713,0.00003554766,0.000021765078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006849559,0.00004347917,0.000040629737,0.00012966139,0.0003779719,0.0002674583,0.000055287128,0.00048478993,8.152992e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080669066,0.000034088076,0.03227992,0.000006240856,0.00015206725,0.000008501209,0.017297601,0.00025401212,0.000089018344,0.91189307,0.03746673,0.00043810223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002000195,0.00001457692,0.17462523,0.00008116689,0.000083086976,0.00004805377,0.008543517,0.004064941,0.00005756903,0.034784358,0.775458,0.00023933615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8771087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008085709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041386636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264187945","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv030","title":"<i>Comparative Federalism and Intergovernmental Agreements: Analyzing Australia, Canada, Germany, South Africa, Switzerland and the United States (Routledge Series in Federal Studies)</i>, by Jeffrey Parker.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Relevance (law); Dual federalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.057544352639876166,"score_gpt":0.3118424948043053,"score_spread":0.25429814216442914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264187945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709171,0.004782406,0.000019358975,0.022444034,0.00043288287,0.00027913557,0.00007125595,0.0000064661494,0.0010473564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945798,0.0006269331,0.000016267059,0.0009778485,0.00022082734,0.000007902566,0.0000034542923,0.0000095337255,0.0035574446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661547,0.0010786952,0.0006838173,0.00017080913,0.0008917588,0.0005594711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979728,0.0006320974,0.0006230883,0.00012535386,0.0002909006,0.00035575707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028292944,0.00023808924,0.00057397597,0.000055979388,0.0008184947,0.00067140226,0.00037774787,0.00006070037,0.000009159787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005122209,0.00013278525,0.000058415528,0.00026382768,0.0007964025,0.0006672053,0.00016006586,0.00039812498,8.597511e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013914427,0.00013639574,0.049763866,0.00005911594,0.0011345887,0.00008660566,0.52310085,0.000086034626,0.00004473611,0.023308197,0.40074855,0.0001396357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0106522795,0.00039136386,0.030938154,0.00044196605,0.00020246598,0.00017915494,0.41894627,0.00025297276,0.00008676675,0.012146455,0.52487344,0.0008887267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7004654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6949058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124124885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062688946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031054314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6474348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311479810","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjw002","title":"Governing an International Transboundary River: Opportunism, Safeguards, and Drought Adaptation in the Rio Grande","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Economic shortage; Corporate governance; Water scarcity; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Government (linguistics); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0174668177881999,"score_gpt":0.20546185590707436,"score_spread":0.18799503811887447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311479810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149806,0.00029833353,0.06648775,0.011836417,0.0005826487,0.00017241671,0.00000959845,0.00003625685,0.005596004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801093,0.0009392529,0.00040271526,0.00022909073,0.00019120274,0.0000018295549,0.000006322611,0.0000128606025,0.00020581827],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999171,0.00010133547,0.00026181186,0.000054698878,0.00029151255,0.00011961776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964607,0.00007963686,0.00010223644,0.00008945386,0.000046688736,0.000035904603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000805899,0.00008906372,0.00009283951,0.00010778736,0.00010296472,0.00025001095,0.0003103458,0.00002825414,0.00002578626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002348553,0.00004375023,0.000035359604,0.00007432953,0.00004339205,0.0012040265,0.000015471165,0.00013021396,0.0000014268886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088967796,0.00028811098,0.015386041,0.00012573895,0.0008320792,0.0001968898,0.17646767,0.18867065,0.0022903506,0.010299595,0.021202372,0.58335084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007891138,0.0003872074,0.1753011,0.00034169565,0.00023359722,0.00059203675,0.005514517,0.15011273,0.00021314957,0.007893667,0.6507899,0.0007292274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003339362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083392944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6295876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045016805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010411107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24108616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385249247","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv037","title":"Secession Risk and Fiscal Federalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Decentralization","score_opus":0.029741393266418087,"score_gpt":0.290269295680313,"score_spread":0.2605279024138949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385249247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93214357,0.0015867865,0.004144276,0.042105716,0.0014924733,0.00018026658,0.000005526479,0.00002784925,0.018313546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994878,0.002032687,0.00015906586,0.0009828225,0.0006305676,7.8722496e-7,9.443774e-7,0.000007686361,0.0013074272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980032,0.00050644856,0.00030559764,0.00007782232,0.0008613165,0.00024563607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988469,0.00013482076,0.0004345374,0.00009254131,0.00023819966,0.0002529996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026562333,0.000090028196,0.00015603063,0.000044896526,0.0007237503,0.00043463908,0.0002621085,0.00007727384,0.00003586821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007240086,0.000054391596,0.00005376511,0.00018217243,0.0001550367,0.00089381466,0.000053042222,0.00022989334,0.0000066620482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005778368,0.00028795493,0.110722646,0.00001808781,0.000118812866,0.00004461179,0.10523819,0.00032340173,0.00012525698,0.062399503,0.6540047,0.06613903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019916252,0.0002376467,0.042317238,0.000066159286,0.00009867245,0.00008203646,0.013894943,0.0002704237,0.00015823802,0.042697765,0.8979149,0.0002703571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014448524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005117314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24391022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119668905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017230735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55665755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584855646","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx017","title":"The Crown and Canadian Federalism, by D. Michael Jackson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Dual federalism; Political science; New Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022385696715418568,"score_gpt":0.28680059655578516,"score_spread":0.2644148998403666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584855646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30163398,0.0084762545,0.000017572009,0.5779304,0.0019087433,0.0001831833,0.00001984642,0.000010574538,0.10981946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912012,0.003628178,0.000011347982,0.0019801718,0.0007562682,0.0000019975178,3.9808336e-7,0.0000049767764,0.0024154566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986845,0.0001829631,0.00023626082,0.00007544702,0.00043675455,0.0003840662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866056,0.00022653988,0.00035501833,0.00015752886,0.0003337506,0.00026658096],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019814647,0.00009890934,0.00015293091,0.00003446663,0.017914847,0.0019714623,0.00080350315,0.000057451354,0.000023813924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081599684,0.0000528374,0.00007144577,0.000048625458,0.0013706782,0.0005364883,0.00008197091,0.00025212666,0.000006113121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006900678,0.000030009947,0.009894422,0.0000028135503,0.00025758246,0.000026520525,0.012692982,0.0000015661718,0.000091098744,0.28569728,0.6577663,0.033470426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021603444,0.00002192078,0.02684373,0.000017103614,0.000029126983,0.00003076259,0.0042645223,0.0000020535383,0.000014445274,0.022970958,0.94549125,0.00009810622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5836342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7302019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6895672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011683849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005823868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586982757","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjw043","title":"Three-Quarters Empty or One-Quarter Full? Martha Derthick on the Courts, Federalism, and Public Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Scholarship; Pessimism; Legalism (Western philosophy); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Adversarial system; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.06639329898080316,"score_gpt":0.32634938873749086,"score_spread":0.2599560897566877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586982757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21993586,0.00018583355,0.0005018006,0.7118828,0.00081660855,0.0002900436,0.00002654413,0.000026406564,0.066334076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98205787,0.0003340126,0.000116580515,0.013739226,0.0022651956,0.0000057162406,0.0000013012992,0.000015993175,0.0014641307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971192,0.0005280643,0.00047968148,0.00016590384,0.0010193759,0.0006878095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660933,0.001045433,0.0008775712,0.000524417,0.0005054126,0.00043780918],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026177398,0.00022628836,0.0003342083,0.00013185144,0.007903199,0.003075088,0.0013172603,0.00012586506,0.00026637389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018150597,0.000116254654,0.00017204553,0.00011900218,0.0026653605,0.0010755314,0.00011232623,0.0006415238,0.000021566357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013261719,0.000078885074,0.0014298586,0.0000051142297,0.00013122227,0.000017548458,0.0022684268,0.0000016470976,0.0000113002525,0.94202423,0.05109377,0.0028053613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010702279,0.0005059891,0.025696594,0.000103712395,0.000105085885,0.00037633203,0.0062132035,0.00003391885,0.000010808009,0.042884514,0.9225602,0.0004394139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087396875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011285925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89913976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016495342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027506382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607314962","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx025","title":"Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Post communist; Political science; Communism; Political economy; Economic system; Economic geography; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05154112912042661,"score_gpt":0.3456976157494429,"score_spread":0.2941564866290163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607314962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389706,0.00055627007,0.00027547232,0.18802741,0.009254835,0.00017915986,0.0003313329,0.000013787194,0.06239117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557173,0.000093493145,0.00011511393,0.0004805145,0.002124537,9.573325e-7,0.0000025423942,0.000005711331,0.0016054225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998159,0.00036798202,0.00045452485,0.00006264047,0.00072968024,0.0002261964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734384,0.00048235917,0.0010004226,0.00030362158,0.0007191944,0.00015056095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014129151,0.0000914069,0.00027306506,0.000028131892,0.001956166,0.0005241767,0.0011770052,0.000058428654,0.000061755665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027161387,0.000057216523,0.00011988814,0.00004562081,0.0006700106,0.0011641897,0.00010057704,0.0002519533,0.0000070904907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008885122,0.00015315466,0.022164347,0.0000070181973,0.00015981075,0.000017659078,0.0057245926,0.0000050869826,0.00042779866,0.95003796,0.018796274,0.0024174713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060892245,0.000037227157,0.46692124,0.00005464885,0.000026671114,0.000009578812,0.0003763623,0.0000029668704,0.00004074015,0.0046789977,0.5271615,0.00008112905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121618465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013460548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94535893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073319374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005378279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734257280","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx043","title":"Introducing a Societal Culture Index to Compare Minority Nations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Political science; Index (typography); Politics; Sovereignty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Normative; Democracy; Minority rights; Empirical research; Political culture; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economic growth; Development economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.033229853718498334,"score_gpt":0.3410213217413101,"score_spread":0.30779146802281176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734257280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5575047,0.000420817,0.0010747703,0.2929316,0.0027004099,0.0003156842,0.00003066113,0.000023481252,0.14499791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891791,0.000034987457,0.0001481614,0.0008952748,0.00251681,0.0000016409306,2.3496827e-7,0.0000037849961,0.007220055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985462,0.0001811249,0.0002680971,0.00008120666,0.0006182747,0.00030512348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849665,0.00011234449,0.00046704433,0.00023215543,0.00044888366,0.00024294297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016707882,0.00007731902,0.00018208077,0.000033194883,0.003274683,0.00097564247,0.0009085186,0.000040509036,0.000039326565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023654574,0.000048292317,0.00011645926,0.000093601055,0.00018389987,0.0006862806,0.000091819296,0.00029265258,0.000012926352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035756082,0.00011882336,0.03247759,0.000021354073,0.00012633475,0.000012339035,0.051018953,0.00006374476,0.00015465758,0.4084752,0.5043857,0.0031095585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023763336,0.000026690055,0.1600185,0.000053217074,0.000022869319,0.000023205697,0.0023445846,0.000022531243,0.000025369689,0.004655855,0.8324497,0.00011984215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02714735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018393753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43167436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016474334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020533428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744934096","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx046","title":"Dynamic De/Centralization in Canada, 1867–2010","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Modernization theory; Political science; Nationalism; Citizenship; Localism; Globalization; Federalism; Political economy; Public administration; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01714878104020529,"score_gpt":0.2854445466285561,"score_spread":0.26829576558835083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744934096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91475993,0.0002619308,0.00023995766,0.070365764,0.0015757127,0.00008930887,0.000006921054,0.000003195873,0.012697289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969227,0.00020853287,0.000022650025,0.0005902503,0.00020557527,6.4034447e-7,1.7528077e-7,0.00000441365,0.002045068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986957,0.0002097856,0.00026175161,0.00004553084,0.00044003272,0.00034724126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990228,0.00009878221,0.0004563108,0.00014978851,0.00011699875,0.0001553367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014494736,0.000054917324,0.00013002966,0.00002180043,0.00073202874,0.00034382698,0.0006350954,0.000037115333,0.00003763211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009379008,0.000037300502,0.000037629536,0.00004633426,0.00009412981,0.00047995188,0.000027534345,0.00018193698,0.0000016907746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009284803,0.00013536564,0.41198522,0.000041656844,0.00009638483,0.00020382456,0.019606967,0.0003726309,0.0002707421,0.42640617,0.124579854,0.016208332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002954941,0.000008243399,0.853116,0.00005724521,0.000008287847,0.00002278477,0.00077884016,0.00033341808,0.000011962271,0.004904027,0.14038426,0.00007947644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44113073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009598237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001923631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56302476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766985713","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx059","title":"Territorial Politics and Institutional Change: A Comparative-Historical Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Formative assessment; Relevance (law); Political science; Institutional change; Distribution (mathematics); Regional science; Sociology; Economic geography; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.11113074288731706,"score_gpt":0.3639255908357007,"score_spread":0.25279484794838364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766985713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83978575,0.0013969803,0.00084322493,0.12085657,0.0071944077,0.00022101986,0.000037194914,0.000015020214,0.029649852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273455,0.00010056447,0.00007001478,0.00027670723,0.0055519342,0.0000017991111,3.285195e-7,0.000002273237,0.001261841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857336,0.00022306465,0.00029024316,0.00006979165,0.0005851994,0.00025836058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869955,0.00015371507,0.0005080037,0.00015691563,0.00023936946,0.00024242171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012568326,0.000075781485,0.00028934758,0.000067309054,0.0024552662,0.000578721,0.00048013637,0.0000606612,0.00001723287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006020626,0.000048223206,0.00012781461,0.00008951514,0.0004140327,0.0007310608,0.000061902734,0.00019728763,0.0000016030576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479402,0.00010005254,0.02858477,0.000008717924,0.0004630925,0.000021903323,0.015441749,0.000004254066,0.000018804209,0.93289655,0.021406146,0.001009158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032634859,0.00003756195,0.21666916,0.000016553404,0.00017267744,0.000019246612,0.00021938146,0.000050884908,0.0000036125214,0.0041926107,0.778206,0.00008596634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083920866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00790569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92870396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003590482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019156694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889853603","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy027","title":"Climate and Clean Energy Policy: State Institutions and Economic Implications, by Benjamin H. DeitchmanPolitical Opportunities for Climate Policy: California, New York, and the Federal Government, by Roger Karapin","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Federalism; Energy policy; Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Climate change; Political science; Public administration; Business; Economics; Economic policy; Engineering; Renewable energy; Politics","score_opus":0.04349861915082217,"score_gpt":0.29604484021497396,"score_spread":0.2525462210641518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889853603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19069663,0.0024104586,0.00060845056,0.79311395,0.00018223067,0.00038997474,0.0063532554,0.000019196606,0.0062258816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651125,0.010667547,0.000054855263,0.020543141,0.0013134876,0.000015210559,0.000010476319,0.000021257754,0.0022614943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982418,0.00023870287,0.00046279276,0.00016203633,0.00023168368,0.00066301506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983863,0.0003916422,0.0004259887,0.00015850551,0.00007547818,0.00056208484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012598508,0.0001782105,0.00027598697,0.00007286864,0.0022545971,0.0008996951,0.000303899,0.00007922579,0.000012169582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026235986,0.00012337869,0.00007374749,0.00009152194,0.0017448085,0.0005050076,0.00009868624,0.0001530516,0.0000011542741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013177813,0.000013443593,0.00028958713,0.000007984955,0.00005568063,4.7685336e-7,0.0025597517,7.8884193e-7,0.000016212605,0.6805491,0.30578867,0.010586586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015137469,0.00009049778,0.0019560398,0.000023077748,0.000051733332,0.00009858436,0.0020279856,0.00006426806,0.000056820965,0.038521767,0.95540154,0.00019395952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15796773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09938901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003545412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010273805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891627666","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy026","title":"The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada, by Robert Schertzer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Scholarship; Power (physics); Negotiation; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01939889538228969,"score_gpt":0.27695199841936124,"score_spread":0.2575531030370716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891627666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57142943,0.0018815197,0.00008062896,0.40252778,0.0015543208,0.00022814571,0.000081799175,0.000005432359,0.022210939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483967,0.00012509353,0.000009888254,0.0018078074,0.0014159563,0.0000020912769,5.8613443e-7,0.0000060170646,0.0017929174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759847,0.0005968756,0.00043798014,0.00007925121,0.0009037853,0.00038365924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980996,0.0008072298,0.000431205,0.0001684931,0.0003678853,0.00012556971],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023440246,0.0000917913,0.00019080023,0.000011622099,0.0017962543,0.00032359187,0.00075487234,0.000061845385,0.000086063876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091507693,0.000044054566,0.00007016434,0.00015919973,0.00044097612,0.0002919529,0.00006264377,0.0002822822,0.0000024819208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011639767,0.000066768764,0.0060966364,0.0000017146219,0.000108376305,0.0000053610956,0.014678765,0.00000905339,0.00040518018,0.10775079,0.8684068,0.002354201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042860935,0.000043729582,0.045710206,0.00005216204,0.000023629907,0.0000053204544,0.006557185,0.00006906473,0.00020981886,0.008673417,0.93812644,0.00010042959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94698817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4234102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024927896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012264455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894311746","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy034","title":"The Canadian Reference Power: Delegation to the Courts and the Navigation of Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Delegate; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; New Federalism; Blame; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02384343397391637,"score_gpt":0.2908756696374878,"score_spread":0.2670322356635714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894311746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4095348,0.0012562505,0.00009627199,0.5367436,0.0011544181,0.000406508,0.000009914716,0.0000071972668,0.050791085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959201,0.0004185125,0.00001873224,0.0027097214,0.000654986,0.000005301505,6.1337727e-7,0.0000035279445,0.00026846692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816245,0.0005262898,0.0003329985,0.00006962586,0.000653371,0.00025523978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775594,0.00056803605,0.00034035373,0.00012941587,0.0010845839,0.0001216833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044056484,0.00008583889,0.00013978082,0.000039448372,0.0077030784,0.00056186615,0.00055586384,0.00004333357,0.0000146585235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079136394,0.000033662287,0.000056627698,0.00021114909,0.0017584207,0.00026387267,0.00005901239,0.00023284314,0.000006920183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120161836,0.000008263542,0.00030475412,0.0000010378585,0.00008253989,0.0000010968265,0.028093837,0.000010580154,0.000018198218,0.94096494,0.02448201,0.00591256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056877406,0.0001314627,0.037477773,0.000072778996,0.000084923704,0.00005290622,0.0121945115,0.000029215944,0.0000578765,0.1985869,0.7506009,0.00014199909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35104656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65718824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74237806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012563165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067520014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99358875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900216905","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy040","title":"<i>The Parliaments of Autonomous Nations</i>, Edited by Guy Laforest and André Lecours","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Autonomy; Theme (computing); State (computer science); Gender studies; Economic history; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012903225716230008,"score_gpt":0.2810982031273108,"score_spread":0.26819497741108084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900216905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85971105,0.0028343687,0.00032633537,0.09762968,0.002772346,0.00029134558,0.00005144108,0.000016475487,0.036366977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99468094,0.00049627357,0.000026299798,0.0005097153,0.0009781129,0.0000015920149,3.783855e-7,0.0000054265815,0.003301284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856526,0.00023177374,0.00036432143,0.00005806715,0.0005053538,0.00027521185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841505,0.00045576488,0.000497801,0.000102183825,0.0003868388,0.00014236377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019580398,0.000069246606,0.0001451074,0.000032733147,0.0011067999,0.00026373757,0.0003692799,0.000050055896,0.000019776098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008036645,0.000037877464,0.000049263723,0.00016896226,0.00063331146,0.00033742553,0.00003560476,0.00013312002,0.0000028773663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079319885,0.00012992552,0.0071938084,0.000014837765,0.00015513586,0.0000033319322,0.008747518,0.000002362678,0.00043867744,0.21357788,0.7614971,0.008160142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032258325,0.00009815416,0.009516461,0.000033712062,0.000017687587,0.000016541631,0.0006747274,0.000019169383,0.00016492809,0.0045875357,0.98448545,0.0000630642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006819837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004283679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22298838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007044143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017327844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900510850","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy036","title":"Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Theorizing Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Political science; Public administration; Regional science; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.02556067526305265,"score_gpt":0.3120419825160873,"score_spread":0.2864813072530346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900510850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636462,0.00091948605,0.005007099,0.014419769,0.00058703293,0.00014666207,0.0000028690665,0.000014581684,0.015256348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809635,0.0002593712,0.00010115293,0.00060538313,0.00043054784,0.0000012036531,2.0036019e-7,0.0000057720226,0.0005000405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985515,0.00048620047,0.00029759214,0.00006302142,0.00030002522,0.00030170055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919933,0.000171911,0.00023505307,0.00006444407,0.0002062124,0.0001230233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024013787,0.00006410046,0.00012338598,0.000045200326,0.0007129334,0.00035003314,0.00018853655,0.00005107761,0.000034834426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088641164,0.00004475707,0.00003278988,0.00014643757,0.00031781732,0.00046676493,0.000021436323,0.00014089294,0.0000022685394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016632282,0.00003829289,0.0088845575,0.000007809702,0.00002016678,0.0000046022446,0.047707617,0.00001720112,0.0004543826,0.9387303,0.0022006475,0.0019177635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002033577,0.00027447153,0.28990746,0.00054746616,0.00007193422,0.00017778108,0.021546274,0.002174324,0.00036910333,0.1410786,0.5412837,0.00053524604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068846354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013336213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019811651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002055312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908631081","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy045","title":"The Limits of Federation-wide Political Parties in Ensuring Federal Stability: Nigeria under the Peoples Democratic Party","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Democracy; Political science; Scholarship; Public administration; Politics; Political stability; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03983703681417212,"score_gpt":0.2995773755339186,"score_spread":0.2597403387197465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908631081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143055,0.00029881057,0.0008455379,0.08022692,0.0006070864,0.00022521547,0.0000021093954,0.000009147674,0.0034796505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973378,0.00039860312,0.000028104945,0.0014348852,0.00049047306,0.000005180654,6.12241e-7,0.000008946769,0.0002953725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966589,0.0010520653,0.00073031744,0.000104449944,0.00092163327,0.0005325972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965759,0.0022048315,0.0004618127,0.00021394352,0.00043719826,0.00010633177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003665463,0.00012582992,0.00022462013,0.000033697117,0.0022469661,0.0007109692,0.00049402524,0.00007163126,0.00004893594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022012782,0.00006102993,0.00010657516,0.00027170609,0.0008230291,0.00060979044,0.000053622938,0.00023840491,0.0000034655645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005155697,0.00035299547,0.28012976,0.00003891581,0.00017287265,0.000005974261,0.070858814,0.00027688823,0.0004394406,0.624592,0.021054987,0.0015617575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018071448,0.0005377012,0.528633,0.00024999338,0.00011047691,0.000041231586,0.1955481,0.00066897843,0.0089124795,0.23821075,0.024749175,0.000531001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009596701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03667278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38638127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021401914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005498289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943154033","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz010","title":"Reconceptualizing Canadian Federal Political Culture: Examining Differences between Quebec and the Rest of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Federalism; Political culture; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Promotion (chess); Civic culture; Rest (music); Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.029916103461324218,"score_gpt":0.25662456145858326,"score_spread":0.22670845799725903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943154033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92357105,0.0004866085,0.000006014382,0.043152206,0.00054385315,0.00014915591,0.000020810427,0.0000030707506,0.03206724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993949,0.00003759023,0.0000131575525,0.0011835332,0.000639953,0.0000010148311,4.1554844e-7,0.0000061360906,0.0041691912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974482,0.0007242919,0.00047771013,0.000090511676,0.00064576906,0.0006134832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977334,0.0010518709,0.0003858344,0.0001266492,0.00021612181,0.0004861138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021099774,0.000110273046,0.00037320625,0.00003358349,0.00074476306,0.00028547907,0.0005013228,0.000075937205,0.000049409973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095729745,0.000055900226,0.000059171733,0.00012152832,0.00053419505,0.000290799,0.00003901067,0.00033136224,8.6125294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023785937,0.00000598754,0.14740446,0.000016531289,0.00009320055,0.000005690289,0.015508039,0.0000012185538,0.0000107013775,0.8270464,0.009197776,0.00068620953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011679509,0.00007302309,0.7991493,0.00021016206,0.00005498737,0.000040181978,0.030010983,0.00001152745,0.000030941457,0.008248067,0.160765,0.00023786897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99897677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81879836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040189578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027045298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57281905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979185294","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz027","title":"Assisted Reproduction Policy in Canada: Framing, Federalism, and Failure, by Dave Snow","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Parliament; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Federalism; Human reproduction; Narrative; Political science; Government (linguistics); Assisted reproductive technology; Public administration; Public policy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Geography; Medicine; Politics; Ecology; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01273400203705291,"score_gpt":0.2587116715931764,"score_spread":0.24597766955612346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979185294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82907015,0.0022803152,0.00001623994,0.16709074,0.00041998594,0.000338158,0.000003900853,0.000019922603,0.0007606025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950945,0.0007291998,0.00024650717,0.0024615414,0.00039329063,0.000004043161,0.0000055861124,0.000020347687,0.0010450187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812365,0.00013782823,0.00061853864,0.000267589,0.00047100792,0.00038140104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984342,0.00011795703,0.00050852326,0.00048175792,0.00030051076,0.00015704012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011772502,0.00017329094,0.00047099442,0.0003037402,0.00014752356,0.0000851063,0.00018460234,0.00008804647,0.000026381173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015995929,0.0001106627,0.00005132648,0.00042523883,0.00007872729,0.00033136996,0.000065502056,0.0007926255,0.0000023451528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001482315,0.00041081302,0.36558127,0.00055501447,0.0004559928,0.00020080774,0.0019131196,0.00003933381,0.01935935,0.0029433325,0.4940336,0.113025025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003508497,0.00066412496,0.7412547,0.0002919397,0.00007935564,0.005603266,0.0032683157,0.0000495565,0.007416269,0.0021782452,0.23536468,0.00032104412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43234503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12861711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3756734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069585897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016931265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8872834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989574122","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz029","title":"Understanding Majority Attitudes toward Minority Nations in Multinational Federations: The Case of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Status quo; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Perception; Identity (music); Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07476381841171725,"score_gpt":0.3123518136836071,"score_spread":0.23758799527188984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989574122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922203,0.00028410158,0.00043040272,0.07127474,0.0009852864,0.00031304616,0.000035453017,0.000004265625,0.034452405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998444,0.000028010143,0.00004389939,0.00027976965,0.00020439732,0.0000018977618,3.9804877e-7,0.0000026445148,0.0009949701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840033,0.00039055265,0.0003930548,0.0000588967,0.00053704175,0.00022010585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803925,0.0011416652,0.0003501801,0.00009001334,0.00030204913,0.00007682847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002322885,0.000063324085,0.00014684605,0.000052973744,0.00080125476,0.00016240057,0.0002821309,0.000039274077,0.000065272136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001163601,0.00003791279,0.000055006916,0.00025445718,0.00011743934,0.00038489213,0.000029385987,0.00022796539,7.4054833e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009201227,0.000048490398,0.019951481,0.000019160634,0.000029184204,0.000026616923,0.0037534062,0.00016272718,0.000012778384,0.97111684,0.004816116,0.00005401961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033583452,0.00016124733,0.7019399,0.00041318397,0.000103640385,0.0013227235,0.07122285,0.0020844513,0.00012380331,0.108404525,0.11017521,0.0006901707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82334936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8627123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079071283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013222876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61626846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042659518","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaa020","title":"Attitudes toward Ethnocultural Diversity in Multilevel Political Communities: Comparing the Effect of National and Subnational Attachments in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Multinational corporation; Geography; Political science; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Psychology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.15293704136058217,"score_gpt":0.37032371255146784,"score_spread":0.21738667119088567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042659518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719357,0.00005327743,0.000007268842,0.027189704,0.00008033876,0.00010494733,0.000006383371,0.0000014551417,0.0006209247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993335,0.00000323425,0.0000052442383,0.00054852397,0.00009707756,0.0000013697874,0.0000014859747,0.0000017568315,0.000007821878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980097,0.00085047266,0.00029252065,0.00003526203,0.000610543,0.00020150501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984622,0.0011064046,0.00013120346,0.00002729793,0.00016552661,0.000107376414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014314033,0.000058063644,0.00017222138,0.00003078274,0.00031572077,0.00005169748,0.00024661238,0.000026167147,0.000018601451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047163773,0.000033431083,0.000028115694,0.00011713068,0.00014281955,0.00022281281,0.00008937281,0.0002579039,3.1433532e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043424912,0.00001109615,0.97213113,0.000018635907,0.00001749479,0.0000011041535,0.013018856,0.00020506249,0.000010237841,0.014101343,0.00039655133,0.00004506811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055366947,0.000049430615,0.99431133,0.000036193564,0.000007670568,0.0000023980165,0.0033382808,0.0009905862,0.000030139448,0.0004727443,0.00016123029,0.000046344998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92122245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88911635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03210612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004297329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034688693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24283008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117418069","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaa035","title":"Undermining Governors: Argentina’s Double-Punishment Federal Spending Strategy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Dominance (genetics); Welfare; Opposition (politics); Political science; Economics; Punishment (psychology); Public economics; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09494603001844441,"score_gpt":0.3426340219890109,"score_spread":0.24768799197056646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117418069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504535,0.0006420061,0.0013652118,0.19337884,0.0016850344,0.000356458,0.00001418545,0.00007748673,0.2520273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930598,0.00037343896,0.000348905,0.0034816777,0.0016487456,0.0000011099904,0.0000016611083,0.000017475926,0.0010671898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750817,0.00031004602,0.0005391365,0.00012272655,0.00095007924,0.00056986266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983754,0.00022032054,0.0006428668,0.000118325974,0.00019497534,0.00044809954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015501046,0.00015541498,0.00028730615,0.000032714415,0.0013817607,0.0009740662,0.0007202574,0.00007737692,0.00037719012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023396485,0.00011415294,0.00023424682,0.0002764729,0.00026515982,0.00059809105,0.000098460296,0.00049949053,0.000017774582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030147383,0.0002904595,0.005970449,0.00005120314,0.00088235614,0.00013574083,0.2156618,0.0011127518,0.0010159704,0.5122117,0.25406924,0.0082969135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00470196,0.00087137835,0.012111141,0.00015015324,0.00030959712,0.00014233221,0.20991062,0.0011255594,0.0005464597,0.022140678,0.74682343,0.0011667283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010327576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49275416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022855011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004563783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165420987","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab005","title":"Projecting the Nation(s) in Multinational Federal Systems: International Education and Nation Branding in Canada/Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Nation branding; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03063296776982866,"score_gpt":0.29828131473622316,"score_spread":0.2676483469663945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165420987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91928554,0.0008828083,0.00008890383,0.069518976,0.0026793145,0.00019653077,0.0000053606823,0.0000033864358,0.007339206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696934,0.00007449907,0.000032298616,0.0005451626,0.000668255,0.000008490746,0.000002324785,0.000004261693,0.0016953867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980444,0.0005336424,0.00044710352,0.000082535356,0.0007033928,0.00018894307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836046,0.0005874881,0.0003562471,0.000050184408,0.0005915814,0.000054028515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022322922,0.000065284345,0.000119599055,0.000087071014,0.00040471822,0.00047758923,0.00021627577,0.000036069112,0.0000135428245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023574454,0.000043591055,0.00002483329,0.0002708729,0.000045323457,0.0006489397,0.000032492706,0.00024785494,3.1622304e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057409336,0.00024641564,0.25276113,0.00006258049,0.00008381046,0.00003447928,0.0366214,0.0013170115,0.00017750342,0.6730351,0.010088512,0.025514655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012832974,0.0000123356285,0.79269034,0.00051984424,0.000012498998,0.00026552172,0.053781867,0.003895443,0.000047689093,0.0045632944,0.14268944,0.00023843405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99160784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6684718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017428043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050143404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88952243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166377604","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab011","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Coordination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Responses in Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public administration; Pandemic; Procurement; Member states; Business; Economics; Economic policy; Law; European union; Management","score_opus":0.04789608263493415,"score_gpt":0.32612999570565077,"score_spread":0.2782339130707166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166377604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95795214,0.00038057574,0.000018393726,0.04059464,0.00030542485,0.000063777385,0.000013347995,0.0000033285146,0.0006683666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105257,0.00011852726,0.000005828204,0.0017168155,0.0002432895,0.0000019101249,2.679144e-7,0.0000040918744,0.0068567186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808675,0.00067531486,0.00032836644,0.00007784477,0.00056738476,0.00026431883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984427,0.0009455317,0.0002693385,0.00007998341,0.0000802212,0.00018222329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123496,0.00007340772,0.00014318089,0.00002468721,0.00055585575,0.00023526975,0.00022479113,0.00004007522,0.000047641523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021663418,0.000044227316,0.00003422879,0.0001310333,0.00012095044,0.00031823752,0.000062017316,0.00025561612,3.8681625e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004216,0.000087377375,0.84386086,0.00008364187,0.00015236491,0.0007178714,0.062435523,0.00007850927,0.003293215,0.04568052,0.04219618,0.0009135365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010975582,0.000028535116,0.62475735,0.00008748053,0.000019660365,0.0010387838,0.017219411,0.000015099185,0.00013847192,0.001572981,0.3538605,0.00016416705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72481513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8998217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3116643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094106386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008372241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42752492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166600131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab010","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Conflict in the COVID-19 Crisis: The United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Divergence (linguistics); Skepticism; Incentive; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06304866190792953,"score_gpt":0.3308383654452491,"score_spread":0.26778970353731957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166600131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72660106,0.0004985552,0.000038735256,0.27135107,0.00038881387,0.00008902752,0.00003104945,0.00000288271,0.0009987713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96283454,0.0003072886,0.000005787574,0.035680655,0.00024240842,0.0000025911174,0.0000017580425,0.0000042575334,0.00092070753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972722,0.0011347684,0.0003571159,0.000078323166,0.00082656834,0.00033105825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.00095500663,0.00027734734,0.00013197713,0.00010503638,0.00020080655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029531522,0.000090106914,0.00015239512,0.000022017397,0.00069069397,0.00045519526,0.0005047217,0.000036953505,0.000071180766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010402591,0.00004302683,0.00004518561,0.00026694726,0.0001733086,0.00021038382,0.000059333164,0.0003708349,6.313205e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053349268,0.000050117316,0.008804538,0.000017157714,0.00009556854,0.00029204873,0.09677571,0.00012097744,0.000021119346,0.14651318,0.747155,0.00010125451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031717223,0.00001975652,0.01180923,0.000019879064,0.000017028548,0.0002037669,0.082648866,0.000014264402,0.000011182643,0.00094046124,0.9039298,0.00006857259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9633528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9396188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23623346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000471823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081685703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53123295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195366346","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab031","title":"Federal Constitutional Values and Citizen Attitudes to Government: Explaining Federal System Viability and Reform Preferences in Eight Countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University","keywords":"Federalist; Federalism; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political system; Constitutional amendment; Political culture; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.022154561266615868,"score_gpt":0.2819885456755478,"score_spread":0.25983398440893196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195366346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552475,0.0012265715,0.00013119135,0.014349083,0.0004634471,0.00018317605,0.00005197529,0.000012607329,0.028334418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980351,0.00022696822,0.00016706553,0.0005006128,0.0003704982,0.000006652806,6.961985e-7,0.000004761069,0.00068768044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739605,0.0004975294,0.0005438093,0.0001798818,0.000982999,0.0003997084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986201,0.00046537118,0.00026605517,0.000104859704,0.00027120448,0.00027241555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026584053,0.00014380184,0.00036021887,0.000031633524,0.0011317928,0.00093304587,0.0002208723,0.000082616076,0.000026856807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006957411,0.00009567998,0.000052877665,0.00013729665,0.0006658953,0.0007279486,0.00012394671,0.00023567659,0.0000016194164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001279315,0.000065161985,0.13550869,0.00014127686,0.000084247615,0.000057912726,0.011167263,0.000010463752,0.00007450835,0.8507809,0.0012988214,0.00068279984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024095492,0.00028946143,0.8145369,0.0017337706,0.00006471098,0.0008851322,0.051179603,0.000070205744,0.00041298242,0.023992624,0.103693746,0.00073127524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056115077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058123283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8267883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074677455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045636614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89973825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196130899","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab020","title":"Dissecting Public Opinion on Regional Authority: Four Types of Regionalists Based on Citizens’ Preferences for Self-Rule and Shared Rule","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Universitetet i Bergen; Trond Mohn stiftelse","keywords":"Home rule; Rule of law; Autonomy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Political science; Regional autonomy; Majority rule; Identity (music); Public opinion; Public administration; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.09125133047699784,"score_gpt":0.32631382111843604,"score_spread":0.2350624906414382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196130899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82086563,0.0011831695,0.0003757635,0.15439092,0.0021278784,0.0004236736,0.000113204434,0.000043558277,0.020476216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686927,0.00015832542,0.00040870253,0.0007898357,0.0009673551,0.0000064157584,0.000005381575,0.000010090097,0.00078462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997993,0.00038877025,0.0003935355,0.00014887073,0.0007625188,0.0003133377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969464,0.0013239373,0.000536634,0.0001327678,0.0008670265,0.0001932475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018577675,0.00011511564,0.00027004056,0.00006667062,0.000603557,0.00031391153,0.0002823915,0.00009316836,0.00003293495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024660602,0.00007838289,0.00013481926,0.00019097365,0.000116861054,0.00030558865,0.000029816942,0.00020853456,8.745095e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027046894,0.00042052125,0.0099308435,0.00018606812,0.000211772,0.00001346963,0.0042644916,0.00004669383,0.00017276384,0.94343126,0.03759179,0.0034598669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031848361,0.0008911914,0.20114477,0.0015884304,0.000097915996,0.00013372171,0.0038536584,0.0010993938,0.00056163175,0.1835445,0.603247,0.0006529756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010161813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034734394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75988674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104726496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047338314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46421334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212220698","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab037","title":"Political Parties and Decentralization in Pakistan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Devolution (biology); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Constitution; Local government; Power (physics); Incentive; Newspaper; Centralized government; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02614863212868593,"score_gpt":0.3412473208945656,"score_spread":0.31509868876587965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212220698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27955225,0.007751754,0.0015502262,0.01994434,0.0021445302,0.0002329723,0.000024255121,0.000032756925,0.6887669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98382515,0.0007146415,0.00006958858,0.0012141631,0.00031102385,7.318239e-7,0.0000011928271,0.0000062879512,0.013857234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850065,0.00035612428,0.00034099494,0.000069091264,0.00033840252,0.00039475728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915385,0.00014195262,0.00012419866,0.00008554902,0.00028155316,0.00021288711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011048965,0.000072770454,0.0001481985,0.00005352471,0.0003799615,0.00040607707,0.00015783709,0.0000530416,0.0000579704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026183864,0.000053871954,0.0000467693,0.00016482192,0.00023780938,0.00024374145,0.0000293581,0.00016183246,9.66267e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013015634,0.000035345263,0.0020691683,0.0000056204194,0.000011683656,0.00002445055,0.0019960103,0.0000010864266,0.000048540463,0.99519634,0.00007412828,0.0005246082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045165623,0.000030917377,0.009467768,0.000050270082,0.00002721588,0.00008528063,0.01109613,0.00001900589,0.0001767079,0.06295807,0.9155215,0.000115484625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064477546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003086416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9322383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105256295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042761673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39158106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739138","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac008","title":"Dual versus Administrative Federalism: Origins and Evolution of Two Models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dual (grammatical number); Convergence (economics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Dual purpose; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.07011801920331819,"score_gpt":0.342197706841622,"score_spread":0.2720796876383038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214739138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577533,0.0009806599,0.00045967166,0.017766159,0.0013478599,0.00017330352,0.00006098376,0.000010602101,0.021447485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983778,0.00007167984,0.000074380405,0.0001624529,0.00045005942,0.0000041245185,5.5784477e-7,0.0000066374514,0.00085230044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766123,0.00065808004,0.00041015857,0.00008920212,0.0008868559,0.00029445256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.00036377672,0.0005589556,0.00010056667,0.0002343007,0.00016706598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987547,0.0000929603,0.00023267067,0.00005430808,0.0011639929,0.00014029526,0.0002974995,0.0000318672,0.00006450383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022641523,0.00006726125,0.00009195697,0.00020587016,0.00025493302,0.00059207896,0.00009041437,0.00030942773,6.7622375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018357532,0.00005733681,0.00025307317,0.0000049639466,0.00005407601,0.000008984733,0.007630787,0.00024100913,0.00007809991,0.9874957,0.003791342,0.00020100528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009627521,0.002549159,0.017346313,0.00011426986,0.00032235766,0.0005675485,0.055318456,0.0018842452,0.00025447848,0.37009397,0.54109275,0.0008289542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029650625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002667265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6174018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052468246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006361251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244142346","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030081","title":"Briefly Notable","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Citizenship; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.018075681276927418,"score_gpt":0.28246591530738896,"score_spread":0.2643902340304615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244142346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51496077,0.0008973831,0.00007627199,0.07784875,0.000745688,0.00010586543,0.0000056095646,0.00001905087,0.40534058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9531785,0.00034747907,0.00004867946,0.002392315,0.0012614081,7.061637e-7,1.02106085e-7,0.0000060251464,0.04276473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848044,0.00026403388,0.00029664207,0.0000495267,0.0005649443,0.00034441822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991946,0.00017516529,0.00018149152,0.00010849908,0.00015189749,0.00018835306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017880474,0.00006286713,0.00014919098,0.000019951636,0.00058924494,0.00027701096,0.00044484745,0.000045668246,0.0011695102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002622256,0.00003802347,0.00009214374,0.00015147125,0.00014459228,0.000523189,0.000012390703,0.00019308331,0.000082517414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010148334,0.0001451123,0.0011828156,0.000010792149,0.00009024844,0.000038323953,0.014310391,0.000058379646,0.00012151768,0.48486966,0.43132296,0.06774831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001772683,0.000025475088,0.00653082,0.000018855455,0.000010131096,0.000039523846,0.00018577313,0.0000046019386,0.000022880826,0.0070273145,0.98590016,0.000057164394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02391371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014439933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55457723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000838698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001940226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250306456","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004967","title":"Book Reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Federalism; History; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05210293692049371,"score_gpt":0.30165951963573656,"score_spread":0.24955658271524284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250306456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009639801,0.21387455,0.00029914573,0.30679473,0.0024859093,0.0003941248,0.000004710509,0.000027836944,0.46647918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61265206,0.06498747,0.00016096796,0.04851033,0.0063166944,0.0000063786606,1.7362606e-7,0.000022676797,0.26734325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834096,0.00047204373,0.00039600747,0.000046051733,0.00045771734,0.00028723545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990078,0.00016304581,0.00040301174,0.00012022818,0.0001264202,0.00017949357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002255076,0.00006574589,0.00019944938,0.000024336447,0.00046421713,0.00018311184,0.00043738238,0.00004059236,0.0013189035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008430472,0.00003623726,0.00013064436,0.00012448504,0.00012757834,0.0005264407,0.000020371699,0.00020075939,0.00013304732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020220357,0.00002054783,0.00005779229,0.000003874007,0.000008610479,0.00000388579,0.0026711612,3.680737e-7,0.000009684702,0.043215033,0.9502229,0.003784135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073728,0.000020622403,0.000576072,0.00003919547,0.000010922059,0.000029046358,0.00009387272,0.0000051157303,0.0000058667206,0.0011152666,0.9979457,0.000050950584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019337966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024130185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60301226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008434817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003698552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282000494","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac014","title":"Regulating Family Law in Federations: The Impact of De/Centralization, Religion, and International Treaties on Abortion and Child Marriage Policies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Legislation; Federalism; Family law; Affect (linguistics); Law; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.024983204347097346,"score_gpt":0.3304676656020918,"score_spread":0.30548446125499445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282000494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704273,0.00037321675,0.00005520533,0.022521438,0.00014166118,0.00011828699,0.000008075633,0.0000035473001,0.0063512963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841774,0.00080624333,0.000021439218,0.0004622333,0.0001428091,0.0000033197273,0.0000036657998,0.0000044608632,0.00013811009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998788,0.0004441531,0.0002881288,0.000051159066,0.0003036778,0.00012489295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.00016918562,0.00029928947,0.00005762587,0.00014056814,0.00003835937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012120878,0.000055661545,0.000086335276,0.000103929495,0.001160552,0.0002498323,0.00013517852,0.00002041686,0.000009932088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017122863,0.000033576638,0.000041889074,0.00013825746,0.00014237007,0.00023895684,0.00003737206,0.00013750161,4.1039286e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093072165,0.00012530581,0.046366088,0.000008089452,0.00010946712,0.0000016855483,0.138233,0.01953583,0.00041198658,0.78956014,0.0045468686,0.0010084645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010032813,0.0002210078,0.81911385,0.000057633923,0.000036867175,0.00009407996,0.063834384,0.0018419897,0.00010575971,0.10949177,0.004065095,0.00013430387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02028548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013093002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77274776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001668736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010704808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98623854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291237217","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac033","title":"From the Ivory Tower to the Courtroom: Cooperative Federalism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Term (time); Jurisdiction; Constitution; Separation of powers; Original jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.026826196433593217,"score_gpt":0.2686306425056153,"score_spread":0.2418044460720221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291237217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2975435,0.001924979,0.000032628683,0.68312895,0.0015811872,0.00041646376,0.00009130826,0.0000043553146,0.015276633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97819364,0.00014005537,0.000008156743,0.02005631,0.0009869925,0.000023975894,0.0000018862131,0.000005463581,0.0005834973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957941,0.0016140772,0.00047002066,0.00010643015,0.001665602,0.0003497707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739915,0.00154913,0.0003304608,0.0002042051,0.0004447584,0.000072321935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004638525,0.00013242025,0.00025044504,0.000034460572,0.0049700066,0.00024602696,0.0016682221,0.000026156109,0.0003510418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066351617,0.000055483397,0.00010820619,0.000500633,0.00043935428,0.00018823266,0.00023732227,0.0006427615,0.0000015118898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015334526,0.00009062796,0.0013667414,8.147551e-7,0.00019621164,0.000026815784,0.11877057,0.0019445885,0.00003930608,0.05600211,0.82094127,0.00046759474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033222386,0.000080186655,0.016297117,0.000018483759,0.000052305855,0.000026550679,0.16036423,0.000014301571,0.000012798764,0.010387772,0.8122936,0.000120434815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82637054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9002977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032954133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021602288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368347279","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad014","title":"<i>A Written Constitution for Quebec?</i> edited by Léonid Sirota and Richard Albert","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Queen (butterfly); Federalism; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Art history; History; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.020701594154192208,"score_gpt":0.2873191751224956,"score_spread":0.2666175809683034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368347279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4438947,0.0024821416,0.001939698,0.5095614,0.004996418,0.0010959867,0.000224505,0.00011323267,0.035691917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766776,0.0005630025,0.000040010287,0.002152134,0.001824666,0.000010923316,0.00000527208,0.000009141512,0.01871727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862665,0.00018224995,0.00031547312,0.00008388308,0.0004264114,0.00036532016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866265,0.00056499656,0.00027254125,0.00008002286,0.00022699262,0.00019276666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019824128,0.00008485818,0.00019115067,0.00004402379,0.0007255646,0.00030920468,0.00025162194,0.00007459652,0.00001348127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009114206,0.000055237997,0.00007871844,0.00021792126,0.00028680335,0.00046817766,0.000033366592,0.00014548235,0.000008678515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002972574,0.000020445683,0.0004045064,0.000013185981,0.000038466853,0.0000029907762,0.0017947322,0.0000020657967,0.00046772213,0.15692323,0.8386767,0.0016262203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042673066,0.000037073332,0.0020030895,0.00003473984,0.000023529632,0.000017207221,0.00055293215,0.000034031895,0.00006084698,0.004143684,0.99258214,0.00008399561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037645876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069022314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53278285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009763796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019837722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387473697","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad036","title":"Measuring Policy Diffusion in Federal Systems: The Case of Legalizing Cannabis in Canada under Time Constraints","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Legislation; Qualitative research; Government (linguistics); Salient; Complement (music); Frame (networking); Political science; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.05046941324031452,"score_gpt":0.30237060033188073,"score_spread":0.2519011870915662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387473697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516028,0.00019437075,0.000015352025,0.042938124,0.00028526125,0.00016242123,0.000007897561,0.000009218107,0.0047845244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882,0.000088806526,0.000002327826,0.00038779175,0.0002684359,0.000002707872,5.161925e-7,0.000011722141,0.0004176642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699533,0.001277056,0.00059351505,0.00008531397,0.0005390885,0.0005096865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896383,0.00041398604,0.00023385495,0.000116427545,0.00014173756,0.00013013613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004219737,0.00011511978,0.00028433933,0.00033792545,0.0006457696,0.00020805091,0.00042577912,0.000053572367,0.000024810364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046114792,0.00007267975,0.00007117699,0.0009514061,0.00019542822,0.00031108997,0.000042370008,0.000510219,0.0000018014903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046027676,0.00031981998,0.10303053,0.0004062876,0.00076097675,0.008297514,0.6210153,0.10345911,0.0061829067,0.0768181,0.048206206,0.031042978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064834883,0.00018057949,0.29981822,0.0019529177,0.00013162362,0.006095366,0.64867175,0.008022685,0.0003420237,0.006344756,0.020672716,0.0012838922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98032945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19678769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092274847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003828985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6792455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391768338","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae003","title":"Federalism, Decentral Governance, and Joint Decision-Making: Bad News for the Implementation of International Environmental Agreements?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München","keywords":"Federalism; Multi-level governance; Veto; Corporate governance; Convention; Compliance (psychology); International relations; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.016732391311254223,"score_gpt":0.3215731915192477,"score_spread":0.3048408002079935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391768338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.813229,0.0042115366,0.009490145,0.15803389,0.008721797,0.000938014,0.00016346715,0.000023146538,0.0051889843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449575,0.0027964825,0.0008263542,0.00065944274,0.0006319961,0.0000069892003,0.0000057190687,0.000010033975,0.00056723424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982273,0.00008120268,0.0005453432,0.00010159932,0.0008441836,0.000200352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880123,0.00057047413,0.0003896016,0.00006427256,0.00012277602,0.000051623494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014360126,0.00010367506,0.00013238974,0.000080658196,0.0005087403,0.0005522779,0.00039179178,0.00003552057,0.0005453982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014682696,0.00006104319,0.00014295155,0.000087465894,0.00013274996,0.000705867,0.000082625294,0.00013840839,0.0000030959634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042202658,0.00015459188,0.01728377,0.000032806896,0.0013313289,0.00001965197,0.044117194,0.000079592966,0.001162755,0.3087424,0.2162804,0.41037348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001346641,0.00013499583,0.18451858,0.0002684336,0.00014410935,0.00007969735,0.01847855,0.0005063087,0.00048072336,0.030858025,0.76293105,0.00025287218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037171063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009850962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54665065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021397062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017900608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5971728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915596","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae004","title":"<i>Rethinking Decentralization: Mapping the Meaning of Subsidiarity in Federal Political Culture</i>, by Jacob Deem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Decentralization; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political culture; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04500437366301309,"score_gpt":0.2957533105465377,"score_spread":0.2507489368835246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45074555,0.041769996,0.005313106,0.35969603,0.004588016,0.00064623926,0.000027085298,0.000097301585,0.13711667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965676,0.0014044559,0.00008597601,0.0012202413,0.0006064293,0.0000019325632,0.000001217133,0.000005551796,0.00010658662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784434,0.00048258025,0.00047526837,0.000090876405,0.00072141865,0.00038550803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989508,0.0004528105,0.00016389438,0.00006367802,0.00027820165,0.00009063036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025492255,0.00010561308,0.00020840424,0.000068720095,0.0011810107,0.00043948457,0.00040675033,0.00007240083,0.000029464823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005655449,0.00005870441,0.00012760029,0.0005217772,0.0005425503,0.00047191206,0.000067276436,0.0004490812,0.0000020893283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015280933,0.00003287792,0.005801455,0.000014279854,0.00008597433,0.000012610394,0.042266496,0.000024486455,0.00019212248,0.9386855,0.0122249955,0.0006439281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005496573,0.00006812391,0.009326615,0.000724978,0.000103027065,0.0001434839,0.035636555,0.00017149551,0.0005219188,0.7298485,0.222569,0.00033665905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005659132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039130547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5458221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001899963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037905184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90834993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396625434","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae012","title":"<i>Managing Federalism through Pandemic</i>, by Kathy L. Brock and Geoffrey Hale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Federalism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Economics; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02347726187068172,"score_gpt":0.2848828852118721,"score_spread":0.2614056233411904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396625434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378923,0.043172505,0.0073610363,0.06688395,0.005259605,0.00040957626,0.00004772262,0.00023088805,0.0387424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669595,0.019034013,0.00035984867,0.004280278,0.0011743639,0.0000035168118,0.0000057849106,0.000041421157,0.0081413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974704,0.0004122887,0.0005339996,0.00022154006,0.00076625816,0.0005955126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867827,0.00039798935,0.00024227174,0.00018883811,0.00026732826,0.00022528997],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017046941,0.0002280156,0.00032083664,0.00011240634,0.0014303913,0.0018614391,0.00060774095,0.0001552166,0.000035163594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001603258,0.0001593358,0.00016233284,0.00039767197,0.00029810154,0.0014461341,0.00011290888,0.0006719736,0.000011246866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074252835,0.00015067618,0.01464001,0.00014627846,0.0005964138,0.00011138061,0.14994802,0.0001280262,0.0019913,0.05683027,0.76069283,0.014690537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007816777,0.00011842254,0.0029943497,0.00017350078,0.0002120477,0.00041253725,0.049880087,0.0005193255,0.00003076766,0.09011052,0.85424745,0.0005192915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032085849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011671687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12906715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014845544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002982313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399264968","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae015","title":"<i>Indigenous Peoples and the Future of Federalism</i>, edited by Amy Swiften and Joshua Nichols","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Federalism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007172353246309677,"score_gpt":0.2614054989816331,"score_spread":0.25423314573532346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399264968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6172175,0.077604264,0.00028533544,0.26643118,0.0030410727,0.000512517,0.0001765622,0.00004893635,0.034682643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98315465,0.010027393,0.000074398544,0.0025350577,0.0020966341,0.000002733948,0.0000034612071,0.000011121708,0.0020945661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813104,0.0004836786,0.0004048473,0.00010763222,0.00056943885,0.00030339594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980029,0.0011654269,0.0002778471,0.0001164887,0.00026617636,0.00017116017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020216901,0.00013806972,0.00029766595,0.00007266105,0.0012069046,0.0007301914,0.0003622707,0.0000760948,0.000029715868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021188184,0.00007202091,0.00011410615,0.00023543138,0.0016562159,0.00046880654,0.00006378631,0.0003887,0.0000013040357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114592105,0.000038478083,0.00041180546,0.00004786831,0.0002590506,0.000015900687,0.039152864,0.000004530437,0.00010294778,0.8109799,0.14386076,0.0050113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005348991,0.00006549457,0.0007637318,0.00006972344,0.00014588512,0.00025715266,0.011022037,0.000009289984,0.000024281053,0.0059853443,0.9809869,0.00013526513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033624575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010615896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83712614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047210342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010355507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399280637","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae017","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.017363851217235687,"score_gpt":0.2830628415839839,"score_spread":0.26569899036674827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399280637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402504,0.13713579,0.04553257,0.23156658,0.008344033,0.0006717196,0.000026630116,0.000071759045,0.03640051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336815,0.005907871,0.00010265965,0.00014952847,0.00037219748,0.0000019817426,6.624975e-7,0.000002602115,0.00009432408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989478,0.0001704397,0.00031423723,0.00006941702,0.00036592057,0.00013219682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.0004090446,0.00016065969,0.00004287212,0.00023927988,0.000056656925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015224164,0.00007264929,0.00013565723,0.00006644697,0.0014905874,0.00040709638,0.00014912605,0.00003895637,0.000004496876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032612504,0.00004171357,0.000053003423,0.00013384542,0.0022131992,0.00039777826,0.000036230897,0.00016848337,8.121341e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083586,0.000013075504,0.0012422124,0.000007957368,0.00014225116,0.0000028605673,0.007333349,0.000011284448,0.00013409882,0.9634765,0.0064213565,0.021144256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007543169,0.00017194219,0.03730702,0.00037225336,0.0003772704,0.00024750532,0.023981621,0.0013747953,0.00014549126,0.42464802,0.5102729,0.00034683174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061647577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036576192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53882843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044041884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002498864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401206851","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae027","title":"<i>Multiple Barriers: The Multilevel Governance of Homelessness in Canada</i>, by Alison Smith","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Criminology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0233035077151718,"score_gpt":0.3217525083372681,"score_spread":0.2984490006220963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401206851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97091144,0.014182762,0.00012400343,0.011640159,0.0019606052,0.000331675,0.0001843731,0.000011989047,0.0006529686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967771,0.0019487175,0.000014946281,0.00044338964,0.00037171738,0.00001856201,0.000002636347,0.000032779903,0.00039015352],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967229,0.00091315823,0.0010195095,0.00012970914,0.0007194735,0.00049529696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967356,0.0018635627,0.0006401454,0.00025169633,0.00034835018,0.00016065431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021623631,0.00018641297,0.0006217438,0.00005752579,0.00056120445,0.00007435826,0.0007546339,0.00011076114,0.00014429218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005646692,0.00009723275,0.00010959177,0.00037211805,0.00009348425,0.00040406382,0.00010542121,0.0011979493,0.000003860217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006788382,0.00020451921,0.35653973,0.0019128266,0.0007046613,0.00020618213,0.39180005,0.0005200616,0.0013359215,0.0123808645,0.18379237,0.049923982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034333228,0.00013225069,0.23638484,0.0032234762,0.00017071885,0.000013173646,0.46080053,0.0035774123,0.0013397721,0.002024109,0.28821647,0.00068392913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93293744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12015489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006375776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037510167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6654143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402553924","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae034","title":"Between Decentralization and Asymmetry: Explaining Preferences toward the Division of Power in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Political mobilization; Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.02837015183771204,"score_gpt":0.2852332397300176,"score_spread":0.25686308789230555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402553924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97068876,0.0025566223,0.00023518213,0.023266701,0.00049241725,0.000084004205,0.000009549301,0.0000030500591,0.0026636992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993145,0.00035538475,0.000009471644,0.00013231265,0.00013241454,6.3028034e-7,2.7845525e-7,0.000003390084,0.000051610154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.00030971324,0.00032223095,0.00005448996,0.00052583433,0.00021648392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896705,0.00064435997,0.00017118402,0.000051643216,0.000087031054,0.00007874302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018053007,0.000055643282,0.00014404657,0.000035816178,0.00017987742,0.00018661072,0.00024537148,0.000028854705,0.000017688917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004744882,0.000027732765,0.000027895352,0.00023038282,0.00007605308,0.00031929594,0.00003547573,0.00016440001,2.3643173e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030805386,0.00003099081,0.48293623,0.0001220831,0.00017097536,0.000023837049,0.12592466,0.00007991989,0.000052136824,0.3261945,0.018027132,0.046406742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022791396,0.00006493893,0.8635626,0.0005730868,0.00003445734,0.000009549604,0.018300267,0.0001113613,0.000093948955,0.011470508,0.10542135,0.00013001829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8719246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7346553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38062638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000192902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000779386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27018654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403293784","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae008","title":"Subjective Perceptions of Difference in Multi-level States: Regional Values, Embeddedness, and Bias in Canadian Provinces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embeddedness; Perception; Political science; Demographic economics; Regional science; Psychology; Economic geography; Geography; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.08414540416916524,"score_gpt":0.3383810817709529,"score_spread":0.25423567760178767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403293784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843174,0.0015746346,0.00006001947,0.0126251,0.0002612147,0.00014199581,0.000055902266,0.000004320251,0.0009593659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976005,0.0006501431,0.000063330735,0.00016378559,0.000109169465,0.0000033989763,6.620711e-7,0.000005419181,0.0014035675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845916,0.00038020077,0.0003670705,0.00009575646,0.00035652015,0.00034129067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990621,0.00039794654,0.00013466325,0.000060998173,0.00013720509,0.00020704023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018546154,0.000081842045,0.00019644797,0.00018325387,0.00017575055,0.00018876555,0.00023725191,0.00006076815,0.000021583892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004915106,0.000052924326,0.000046039517,0.00030263892,0.00030664532,0.00039167324,0.000020018833,0.00027811693,0.0000011941611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007164945,0.00026169218,0.4271552,0.00020563912,0.00009943257,0.00014223618,0.26688272,0.00010241045,0.00018034205,0.28857186,0.0053540478,0.010972756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022935601,0.000038000737,0.9683459,0.00036428243,0.000007750725,0.000026126943,0.009928947,0.0005157148,0.0000035346695,0.010179789,0.010268394,0.00009221413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90409964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95349073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5411907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046033488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016076594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28519186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405397944","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae047","title":"<i>The Adaptable Country: How Canada Can Survive the Twenty-First Century</i>, Alasdair Roberts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.009458195246600562,"score_gpt":0.22019155709378732,"score_spread":0.21073336184718677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405397944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005907439,0.02220221,0.00004664004,0.8749476,0.015045316,0.00036249624,0.000059247075,0.00003344717,0.081395596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728939,0.010176167,0.0000043917125,0.0009950749,0.0016597436,0.000004980603,0.0000021098908,0.00001657181,0.014247079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732375,0.00049985235,0.00030913905,0.000119794946,0.0011206476,0.0006268182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997722,0.0013276598,0.00024513126,0.00021783268,0.0003331188,0.0001542195],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032364242,0.00017064178,0.00022236486,0.000030690488,0.005451176,0.0016807573,0.00086108036,0.00005640692,0.0000477387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002980004,0.00007179216,0.00012947235,0.00042967455,0.00032085538,0.0002718681,0.00008466096,0.00053242664,0.0000021915778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023445733,0.00000907133,0.00022189016,0.000008027535,0.00019912221,0.000033890643,0.021759843,0.00006807524,8.4442104e-7,0.015121877,0.96077365,0.0017802756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011032094,0.000023806462,0.0002965201,0.000036741403,0.00005484705,0.000039083006,0.06899036,0.00007000579,0.0000018346364,0.00056127843,0.92971224,0.00010299092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6616382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98365945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037888018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016007237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405906595","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae049","title":"Federalism and Social Policy Expansion in Canada during the Justin Trudeau Era","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.009665602133736547,"score_gpt":0.2363320022158864,"score_spread":0.22666640008214986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405906595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7862766,0.002073601,0.0000021028688,0.20713589,0.0010560284,0.000089120105,0.000009491158,0.000009429349,0.0033477445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196607,0.00077397807,0.000004978764,0.0014516491,0.0019073134,0.0000019379438,4.8314973e-7,0.0000113437145,0.0038822708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983484,0.00035490678,0.00031818415,0.00009187933,0.00054957275,0.00033702687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994304,0.00015385161,0.00012940067,0.00007636819,0.00008459359,0.00012537104],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012546076,0.00008911159,0.00016178664,0.00038294843,0.0026140923,0.001723363,0.00035439187,0.000053600867,0.0001000931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014959871,0.00006490945,0.00007045369,0.00040912456,0.00027354332,0.00049741264,0.000047038684,0.00055401115,0.0000025417505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001366922,0.000048672155,0.0009782678,0.00022336986,0.0001837986,0.0007318729,0.36325577,0.0001020532,0.0006136346,0.092566535,0.47873405,0.06242527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033274305,0.000012115706,0.05403775,0.00007042558,0.000033862376,0.00015583026,0.016770218,0.000027614706,0.0000068664986,0.002283801,0.9261088,0.00016002217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99962586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4473747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029129593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008132181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407428885","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf003","title":"A Reply to Fenna and Schnabel’s (2024) “What is Federalism?”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017456448418647668,"score_gpt":0.3070459932782696,"score_spread":0.2895895448596219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407428885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17954412,0.0057077603,0.00034951323,0.7699859,0.003240729,0.00035263767,0.000008874309,0.000027667182,0.04078276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84890234,0.0020781388,0.00018907803,0.087129734,0.00089850294,0.000007126393,1.9167004e-7,0.000013274679,0.060781628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997844,0.00034852975,0.00050616276,0.00015988157,0.00064133713,0.0005000884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984431,0.0003219866,0.00028133346,0.00022624849,0.00038017752,0.000347108],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025601543,0.00014047862,0.0003111416,0.00011679769,0.0010755305,0.0017933645,0.0005509043,0.00008209199,0.00008775595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008347999,0.00009278309,0.00011334782,0.0004241739,0.0001884415,0.0010965475,0.00012975617,0.0003213189,0.000015230674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000727619,0.00005523472,0.0012044491,0.000029384693,0.000116688396,0.00001814424,0.0123477215,0.0000020704979,0.00010157925,0.30075276,0.6712513,0.014047902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003035857,0.000052100437,0.0073592155,0.00022749662,0.000030058687,0.000027812777,0.0025960319,0.0000058193496,0.00006605916,0.015405551,0.97380996,0.00011632969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019895427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015236225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6828562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001819596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003649355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409386891","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf009","title":"A Complex Intergovernmental Problem: Why Asylum Seekers Challenge Canada’s Immigration System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Political science; Public administration; Criminology; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014858851085099038,"score_gpt":0.25432472077148427,"score_spread":0.23946586968638522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409386891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061849583,0.00090122706,0.0005220936,0.78399837,0.0020771835,0.0004915715,0.00013959064,0.000025958767,0.1499944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873589,0.00011871248,0.000035374127,0.0075683733,0.00036392128,0.0000031584602,0.0000011607016,0.000006206964,0.004544168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982649,0.0002968072,0.00038202797,0.00008270606,0.00067132304,0.000302214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990091,0.000121509314,0.00043129735,0.000121049765,0.00016790204,0.00014919667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009812195,0.00010194645,0.0001859251,0.000066043845,0.0007324683,0.00023537526,0.00050347386,0.000049462502,0.00003936038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010320373,0.00007773934,0.00008441196,0.00020755192,0.000105185,0.00036484344,0.00003839006,0.00023005756,0.0000015359385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041138563,0.000020890937,0.0001631746,0.000029265082,0.00008456199,0.000014596339,0.0064666537,0.000013658026,0.000040089613,0.08312655,0.9088005,0.001198959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035821088,0.000035457604,0.004047487,0.00014492206,0.000032735636,0.00002910756,0.013513627,0.000066916145,0.000021717724,0.00061027304,0.98103774,0.000101796315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9608844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92550933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020609056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002353564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5633628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158087","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf015","title":"Federalism, Intergovernmental Conflict, and the COVID-19 Crises in Latin America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Latin Americans; Political science; Federalism; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public administration; Development economics; Political economy; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Virology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03398233416034936,"score_gpt":0.35357710505611206,"score_spread":0.3195947708957627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20474505,0.003050325,0.0011844296,0.66783595,0.0011125078,0.0004874438,0.00002014333,0.000030049943,0.12153413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95003366,0.0029065579,0.00014915483,0.044448107,0.00019752023,0.0000059850286,5.938835e-7,0.0000068598265,0.0022515703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759346,0.0009561631,0.0004880867,0.000099349825,0.0005222054,0.0003407077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722767,0.0019440411,0.0004014212,0.00014394289,0.00010280795,0.00018011776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025601548,0.00012363655,0.00030675158,0.000069809445,0.0011515591,0.00056143204,0.0005684933,0.000060442115,0.00010188028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019544377,0.00007051302,0.00014220437,0.00032567454,0.001572601,0.00024624084,0.00013991976,0.00042249123,0.0000014504691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040764484,0.00015505876,0.0071573905,0.00003264844,0.00029184527,0.000019787112,0.21593954,0.00010630558,0.000052650386,0.46172655,0.3092182,0.0048924005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002176071,0.00004746772,0.003525048,0.000036460893,0.00005464628,0.000022537597,0.068052486,0.00018308606,0.000009965478,0.016099859,0.90965503,0.0001373103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013138541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092368905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034700692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005207077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99343306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411761855","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf024","title":"Variation All the Way Down: Charting the Subnational Trajectories of School Choice Policy across and within Multicultural Democracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Multiculturalism; Political science; Index (typography); Scale (ratio); Decentralization; Development economics; Regional science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.03153268085362771,"score_gpt":0.34975927518016364,"score_spread":0.31822659432653594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411761855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84032756,0.00049183454,0.000031309377,0.15765922,0.00049214636,0.00013912698,0.0000054214925,0.0000081909175,0.0008451973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952405,0.00025622296,0.00006362416,0.0020809858,0.0013575717,0.0000046851615,9.805451e-7,0.0000038374583,0.000991557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998244,0.00042555798,0.00045128597,0.000072530565,0.0005613327,0.00024528487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749124,0.0011239414,0.00057936227,0.000122007004,0.0006211861,0.00006224688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040288647,0.00009998787,0.00014811137,0.00005797829,0.0020774258,0.00062731473,0.0005512469,0.0000610881,0.000021273529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032132356,0.000043536296,0.000074982265,0.00045837974,0.00034152798,0.0010612,0.00006287629,0.00040864482,0.0000013883572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034053947,0.00013051581,0.10114548,0.00008342922,0.0007160721,0.0000015573379,0.77411455,0.0013924498,0.0064186747,0.08995127,0.01801869,0.00768677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006213192,0.000035115445,0.9425153,0.00006367506,0.00007511578,0.00002074413,0.02931905,0.00036885863,0.0005262301,0.006124024,0.020217154,0.00011341727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004357588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005222252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8413698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008689668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031144105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413864450","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf050","title":"Personality and Preferences for Territorial Scales","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Personality; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04618670269146222,"score_gpt":0.3580669042018638,"score_spread":0.31188020151040163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413864450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239087,0.0023918801,0.0011520525,0.048808374,0.007596432,0.00021102643,0.00003679566,0.000013082835,0.015881617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934003,0.00005246012,0.00026529748,0.0027191476,0.0015906519,0.000010232253,0.0000023870748,0.0000066941843,0.0019528486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881876,0.00029881715,0.00037048565,0.00013114019,0.00014971416,0.00023106743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878335,0.00058617385,0.00022299883,0.00014617441,0.0001897565,0.00007153871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015076757,0.000116926974,0.0002506199,0.000097740805,0.0002488268,0.00013863682,0.00034223156,0.00010806483,0.00013889598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011878739,0.000070298534,0.000119437325,0.00009189933,0.00018894745,0.00013674702,0.000027428088,0.0002660193,0.0000017377599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028652719,0.000471266,0.025058117,0.000089885834,0.0011622191,0.0000062812423,0.012299456,0.0000015033717,0.00042729158,0.1191313,0.7650802,0.07340717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002663045,0.00037072963,0.58289987,0.000043242948,0.00014466755,0.00023195148,0.0018055813,0.000005112451,0.00002485094,0.049333442,0.36232698,0.00015049308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021083304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016618602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5578418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001888522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058940637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2866691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416107846","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf067","title":"<i>Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter Era</i> , by James B. Kelly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.012898358641686102,"score_gpt":0.3258684917914153,"score_spread":0.3129701331497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416107846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28403246,0.002689459,0.00008648955,0.64634746,0.0005013751,0.00025739372,0.000013366309,0.0000070622164,0.066064924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820512,0.0008170101,0.000005867149,0.016583435,0.00046088616,0.0000052018286,7.0011674e-7,0.0000021534304,0.000073570285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985652,0.00042213046,0.00030257303,0.000063614345,0.0004114013,0.00023507662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991139,0.00045604017,0.00018785591,0.00005997291,0.00015070214,0.00003148454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002494282,0.00008352843,0.00013203318,0.000080821446,0.0017071791,0.00034713448,0.0003577029,0.000032912867,0.000026365586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002128382,0.000040017276,0.00005810185,0.00035041364,0.00066207704,0.00027469135,0.00004529877,0.0002842795,0.000001218921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006344862,0.000063609514,0.010144186,0.0000026231685,0.00015173566,0.000006091786,0.09661011,0.0000030588014,0.000113712034,0.6077546,0.25224453,0.032842327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009891788,0.000079029305,0.082839444,0.0000579747,0.0000861556,0.00004123758,0.18267536,0.0000028492593,0.000027527574,0.10837615,0.6246778,0.00014732016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010302879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00393829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6980187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006040911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047600377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417012236","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf077","title":"Measuring Identity in Substate Nations: Evidence from Quebec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Politics; Nationalism; Multinational corporation; Scale (ratio); Survey data collection","score_opus":0.06284534241470319,"score_gpt":0.34210134711310003,"score_spread":0.27925600469839684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417012236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397855,0.0042483225,0.001128306,0.04373562,0.0011149803,0.00012599991,0.0000042044144,0.00001024228,0.009846821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950038,0.0007758536,0.000049719885,0.00049294124,0.00026358396,0.0000022591842,1.1833568e-7,0.0000028336888,0.003408866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980538,0.00056102267,0.00043577145,0.00007382818,0.0006265041,0.0002490658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820095,0.0010454901,0.00027685586,0.0001140372,0.00028139312,0.00008129403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003396246,0.00006432004,0.00016758291,0.00012054364,0.0004432524,0.00046821003,0.00059719634,0.000046233516,0.000035227666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040865294,0.00004494582,0.000073846364,0.00057430123,0.00011289924,0.0018703237,0.0000472312,0.00024706894,0.000007483436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077221404,0.00011504021,0.057940062,0.000035215082,0.00010981853,0.00003428918,0.029373504,0.00011836058,0.00045787627,0.8952543,0.0106261065,0.005858164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005682498,0.000013834849,0.7807686,0.0014727485,0.000041405216,0.0000042699435,0.0033438546,0.00005046237,0.00022487456,0.10560161,0.107741065,0.00016905737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56389934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7237844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7896527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044721374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005407527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48922527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417102099","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf078","title":"Trade Attitudes and Federalism: A Study of Provincial Public Opinion toward Canada–US Trade","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Autonomy; Public opinion; Socioeconomic status; Free trade; Trade barrier; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.03147223694592316,"score_gpt":0.3047632790127334,"score_spread":0.27329104206681026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417102099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339028,0.0010843397,0.000035658875,0.15866207,0.0013060455,0.00044673658,0.000019642433,0.000011640255,0.0045310725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997614,0.00015066184,0.000014676516,0.00141552,0.00049826736,0.0000052319992,4.212219e-7,0.0000075275843,0.00029369278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715364,0.00064963714,0.00067714305,0.0001369507,0.0009478304,0.00043478177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986748,0.0003094403,0.00050350715,0.00014600952,0.00013028187,0.00023594509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017553611,0.00014802763,0.00041688292,0.00008645591,0.0007375579,0.00039808854,0.000571793,0.000080122314,0.0000115698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006587017,0.000099108685,0.00008173938,0.00030507415,0.00019730887,0.0004869059,0.00006987109,0.0003177681,1.1969225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038152005,0.002310501,0.1570533,0.00046943774,0.0011174208,0.000073154086,0.07111128,0.000026340793,0.00027313354,0.50572026,0.24641298,0.015050665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015896113,0.00030802033,0.65042967,0.000146179,0.000062949104,0.000035954537,0.009509816,0.000013234664,0.000036041165,0.0016305969,0.3360307,0.000207227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7532686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7877449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50408965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032010433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021655997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5672773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117362574","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf081","title":"Co-Determination: A Central Feature of Multinational Federalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Federalism; Normative; Appeal; Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015151899534510764,"score_gpt":0.3211126147163474,"score_spread":0.30596071518183665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117362574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41847438,0.0020910122,0.0028428622,0.3769528,0.00427181,0.00064841995,0.00008825814,0.00004233188,0.19458814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844615,0.00009349979,0.000241857,0.0012227753,0.0006128807,0.0000020768305,0.000001400265,0.0000050644385,0.013358987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979812,0.00039404765,0.00044433953,0.000078653145,0.00076340453,0.0003383784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981654,0.00045813597,0.00053606764,0.00011328255,0.0005999056,0.00012717622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015021684,0.00009861681,0.00024275196,0.00009015125,0.00059657573,0.00021186561,0.0005061117,0.00010229211,0.00007027205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000996097,0.00006602749,0.00016082877,0.00025614942,0.00024860483,0.00044707398,0.000025574369,0.00027690546,0.0000021066203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467518,0.0001895352,0.004308162,0.0000588857,0.0001244756,0.00001415335,0.011099536,0.00001680222,0.00067156454,0.79128903,0.18549153,0.0066416226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010866481,0.000058240727,0.1267533,0.00021618074,0.00005296788,0.000040055224,0.0011536389,0.00009894993,0.0010317316,0.019832583,0.8495174,0.00015827782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002652738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054509344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7714565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018898449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051864935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45884383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117368511","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf079","title":"Settler Federalism and the Conditions of Indigenous Autonomy: A Comparative Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Federalism; Autonomy; Jurisdiction; Self-determination; Treaty; Unitary state","score_opus":0.022586672783967622,"score_gpt":0.34634138228563577,"score_spread":0.3237547095016681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117368511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93220407,0.0008911089,0.000047426827,0.02120399,0.0010059751,0.0011449452,0.000009973091,0.000011673484,0.043480862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920986,0.0009090081,0.000039211427,0.00043604872,0.00033269697,0.0000047536387,0.0000019436911,0.00000535584,0.00617233],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968501,0.001697293,0.0006292207,0.00009938411,0.00041275308,0.00031125598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973772,0.0009604905,0.0006449986,0.00018948286,0.0007266302,0.0001011929],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041775475,0.00012548255,0.00039510895,0.00018991914,0.009443493,0.00030908338,0.00050190545,0.00006856361,0.00004974915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029442888,0.00006277859,0.00009898794,0.000379337,0.0008606406,0.00036043942,0.000006925416,0.0003680812,0.0000026972061],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072482486,0.00026433208,0.00084743317,0.00000971718,0.00019816567,0.0000012526236,0.82738596,0.000009863327,0.0000010952926,0.16892594,0.0022265404,0.00005722818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043197945,0.00036317576,0.052207492,0.0001056132,0.00044125723,0.000048848724,0.38047668,0.00001845293,0.000064160144,0.05801009,0.5036798,0.00026459203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060192205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25798845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5014533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019391897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011857193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}