{"meta":{"query_hash":"ec9adcf975a2","filters":{"venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism"},"cohort_total":99,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":99,"exported":99,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ec9adcf975a2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Publius+The+Journal+of+Federalism"},"results":[{"id":"W1966039841","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt035","title":"Changing Federal Constitutions: Lessons from International Comparison, edited by Arthur Benz and Felix Knupling.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Political science; Politics; Order (exchange); Constitutional law; Law; Public administration; History; Economics","score_opus":0.02770095170183245,"score_gpt":0.31647263395237274,"score_spread":0.2887716822505403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966039841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050309133,0.335245,0.004364267,0.071031205,0.0051147686,0.00003637019,0.00094223674,0.00017042019,0.57806486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30046046,0.47314727,0.008393761,0.012883019,0.005464841,0.00023189199,0.0025699164,0.0005424887,0.19630641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998971,0.00047701882,0.000052101754,0.00012473554,0.00026023167,0.00011485239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872094,0.00087915803,0.00008225867,0.00010556514,0.00015000554,0.000061994004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547892,0.00060944434,0.00047669807,0.0028539002,0.003333233,0.0064986395,0.0008826699,0.0019828603,0.009908835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005464261,0.0005402613,0.00032173147,0.007138972,0.004798661,0.008732678,0.0017394115,0.003194432,0.0017528773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021097178,0.00002161306,0.00041984947,0.00017519698,0.000014075371,0.000047960453,0.0055148876,0.00044286682,0.00005983217,0.6710863,0.25413293,0.06806327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067500887,0.0000062508843,0.0017443686,0.0007281609,0.000008090464,0.00006292563,0.0026415423,0.00011119123,0.000088265544,0.14411078,0.85048085,0.000010785532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0232364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030499686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0232364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006720468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045978446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048760653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967031825","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv010","title":"Federalism and Women’s Representation: Do Federations have more Women Legislators than Centralized States?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05040549755963111,"score_gpt":0.33843418407964254,"score_spread":0.28802868652001146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967031825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877443,0.00028208684,0.0003053858,0.0010732827,0.000022657034,0.000006629626,0.0000803303,0.0000064611468,0.01047894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989716,0.000050667037,0.00005256248,0.000084356005,0.000016469225,0.0000052941473,0.00004409987,0.0000019929862,0.00077303854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823415,0.0005841056,0.000064214866,0.00020520986,0.00023382458,0.0006783726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553275,0.000784897,0.0025917084,0.00030710685,0.00023567546,0.0005478302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022853066,0.00008067715,0.00032038472,0.0008851902,0.0019261186,0.0014995235,0.0003065802,0.00041071558,0.0049918336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059306505,0.00011989752,0.00023189682,0.0013602322,0.001272064,0.0010962109,0.0013460085,0.0004361909,0.00033613082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014994114,0.0001274854,0.93580925,0.000047550937,0.00006578114,0.00009504934,0.010418178,0.00016273938,0.00060560415,0.0110970475,0.002584691,0.038836718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007938114,0.00007497777,0.9838815,0.000048508555,0.000019674866,0.000060604638,0.006939884,0.00012668804,0.00019430049,0.0008266343,0.007812713,0.000006640353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014040479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037165903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014040479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012039463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010543504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027917504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968502388","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq009","title":"Safeguarding Federalism in Education Policy in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Safeguarding; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Government (linguistics); Education policy; Enforcement; Political science; Autonomy; National Policy; Politics; New Federalism; Economic growth; Higher education; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.010009286994424596,"score_gpt":0.2873418114393782,"score_spread":0.2773325244449536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968502388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50857383,0.0126473745,0.0038503923,0.10683078,0.00035030232,0.00015617769,0.0002876434,0.00008377034,0.3672198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991715,0.001233319,0.000524441,0.0016206864,0.0000217016,0.000017675444,0.000029883673,0.000008427927,0.0048288046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98944724,0.0016507913,0.00019593761,0.00040259995,0.0028603075,0.0054431246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230754,0.002506197,0.0006737906,0.00020036998,0.002423877,0.0018881764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065122917,0.00017136605,0.00037339155,0.0025856835,0.017466133,0.010105325,0.0010003896,0.0019338515,0.0023958064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016133962,0.0002569954,0.00030782082,0.0041728867,0.01184939,0.0024272893,0.003397988,0.0028898339,0.00011030268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084026,0.00006939247,0.026140748,0.00010137859,0.000038524213,0.00022010293,0.018176068,0.0035283733,0.00028340044,0.8867041,0.01238607,0.05226785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013188277,0.000102568374,0.257176,0.0014800549,0.00020489088,0.00016059112,0.07936646,0.007754956,0.0016684587,0.21281895,0.4389087,0.00022655727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18829718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18829718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31953275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9414602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969401051","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004976","title":"The Federal Spending Power in Canada: Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032440156933772626,"score_gpt":0.2883594640292888,"score_spread":0.2559193070955162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969401051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09837189,0.04490522,0.0015555293,0.5093869,0.001549374,0.00003863601,0.00066725985,0.000068856374,0.34345624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504862,0.014904254,0.0006882199,0.016116386,0.0002852376,0.000015328907,0.00017349159,0.00002911105,0.017301805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952135,0.00040443332,0.00007423059,0.00026870478,0.0012972079,0.0027418814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964438,0.0005132347,0.00030335216,0.00013266435,0.0010839956,0.0015228933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505077,0.00030510913,0.0005815421,0.002257814,0.019757167,0.01361762,0.0016414556,0.0026114103,0.005930749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075527895,0.00023981348,0.00027954843,0.0059150406,0.020020008,0.004616458,0.0032354202,0.0042148195,0.00024006193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027438375,0.000018815887,0.00831587,0.00011793678,0.000020150434,0.00019304123,0.013534718,0.000269083,0.00011052204,0.8685192,0.07213686,0.036736477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025953426,0.00001980951,0.059641164,0.0009295863,0.000066157954,0.0001754812,0.05211931,0.00080091984,0.00031283023,0.12096768,0.76480097,0.00014009005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99691534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85342145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14657858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.224822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973235894","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq003","title":"What Explains the Paradox of Tobacco Control Policy under Federalism in the U.S. and Canada? Comparative Federalism Theory versus Multi-level Governance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tobacco control; Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Multi-level governance; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Politics; Public health","score_opus":0.06829945013192025,"score_gpt":0.34424987592910017,"score_spread":0.27595042579717993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973235894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4056432,0.0072827996,0.0033991802,0.31977838,0.0002943338,0.00006177337,0.00063770777,0.0000945618,0.26280808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222517,0.0010580514,0.00033501966,0.004625655,0.00004448712,0.000008721929,0.000058787045,0.000013224456,0.0016309316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967018,0.00072936655,0.00006435263,0.0003247417,0.0007691413,0.0014106048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957158,0.0016411057,0.00072613254,0.00020864219,0.0010900385,0.0006183733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042231507,0.00014383353,0.0005770785,0.0021037234,0.0061975406,0.0071220556,0.001597104,0.002587161,0.0051547056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014134954,0.0001738721,0.00036446133,0.004554905,0.0138231395,0.0034190756,0.0020965443,0.0027962136,0.00017976025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050995106,0.000040781575,0.010000091,0.000104066436,0.00003129863,0.00012290038,0.00420029,0.0016243225,0.00015357231,0.9522238,0.011452817,0.019994985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016657829,0.000048560796,0.119647436,0.0005735423,0.00013168948,0.0001773736,0.034268606,0.009785455,0.0007855904,0.7183485,0.11594871,0.000117949465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9115919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9204913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08840811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07941156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064071864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976031580","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji010","title":"Shaping the Constitutional Dialogue on Federalism: Canada's Supreme Court as Meta-Political Actor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Politics; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Political question; Democracy; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.08276134096458518,"score_gpt":0.30945985077585153,"score_spread":0.22669850981126635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976031580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14476815,0.0073691434,0.021932732,0.23182447,0.00063360267,0.000110927824,0.00030310068,0.00012161714,0.59293634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97838223,0.0008367073,0.0025990182,0.0069687986,0.000089954076,0.000026361438,0.000030352885,0.000031833766,0.011034866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915036,0.002851922,0.00014646763,0.0008096059,0.0019061,0.0027822934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325,0.0032302397,0.00027588537,0.00032951427,0.001949091,0.0009653666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008785244,0.0003126349,0.00055084313,0.0020808815,0.030549524,0.017324341,0.0022744017,0.0048481906,0.0034418246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013543369,0.00040757895,0.00043281732,0.0025987704,0.031053217,0.0042222426,0.0043000574,0.007888487,0.00017066517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055974137,0.0000031882123,0.00066892966,0.00000763856,0.0000045789443,0.00007653615,0.007934239,0.0003807648,0.00009213507,0.9842482,0.0038948134,0.0026833222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006492114,0.000020806478,0.007061493,0.00042452983,0.00008432596,0.00009618689,0.030346958,0.0044418466,0.00067177904,0.53129387,0.4253565,0.00013680433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97894406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98842144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1634058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1634058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1997238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97033066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989114191","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs024","title":"Is Federalism Gendered? Incorporating Gender into Studies of Federalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.15612299886843747,"score_gpt":0.4009926049919845,"score_spread":0.24486960612354705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989114191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50239277,0.02036628,0.029446447,0.048165645,0.0010431682,0.00003119177,0.00013482397,0.000036409365,0.39838323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963607,0.001160316,0.00045182966,0.0005435458,0.000095316864,0.000009971652,0.000008081893,0.0000083674995,0.001361829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539423,0.0033423838,0.000075544966,0.00035527477,0.0003327823,0.0004997846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954047,0.00325745,0.00058307056,0.0002986075,0.00016709871,0.00028905872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053233407,0.0002504452,0.0004935946,0.001609725,0.004854143,0.006137257,0.00055884814,0.0012839613,0.0035435085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076036416,0.00014797132,0.0003137217,0.002071904,0.023155132,0.0077613518,0.00323144,0.0015017327,0.00019303712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002517094,0.000013737638,0.0060020257,0.000043157022,0.000009343844,0.000052472602,0.039357103,0.00009654614,0.00019647909,0.93793297,0.00075918634,0.015511856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010791675,0.00007446831,0.016235787,0.0005015265,0.000023635428,0.00024044029,0.10266338,0.00057143,0.0006577725,0.79372793,0.08526424,0.000028581366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004129067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006137257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004262831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019069159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030929148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991974378","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjn029","title":"The Gradual Defederalization of Canadian Health Policy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Library science; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04426395727677823,"score_gpt":0.30849443906242274,"score_spread":0.2642304817856445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991974378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11681342,0.0126149515,0.01321848,0.5162596,0.0025497398,0.00031032876,0.0011975283,0.0004280401,0.336608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87988824,0.004127291,0.0068431613,0.050468493,0.0004773974,0.00011201034,0.00030047822,0.00009564612,0.0576873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686855,0.0043853656,0.0008954796,0.002764278,0.016152581,0.007116739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97058266,0.004877032,0.0017796101,0.0019101569,0.01630251,0.0045481133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020280786,0.0005549031,0.00073361513,0.004486625,0.0176198,0.011701923,0.0022804758,0.00513115,0.003231893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04137844,0.0008094268,0.0011332607,0.00561803,0.019775035,0.0034591572,0.007184721,0.011097988,0.00025758316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006046807,0.000025049185,0.003688288,0.00022626482,0.00006318648,0.00018836278,0.012979314,0.0011079996,0.0007666743,0.89875174,0.044164713,0.037977904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006549642,0.000049917937,0.029521575,0.00036186186,0.00004992032,0.0001228045,0.005863032,0.0014130521,0.00072036445,0.04403164,0.9176379,0.0001625298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7412836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2587164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3024459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8597839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992593401","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl007","title":"Seceding The Canadian Way","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Injustice; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Politics; Self-determination; Negotiation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015011845501710532,"score_gpt":0.2702112275652706,"score_spread":0.2551993820635601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992593401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12733352,0.002651678,0.0022878083,0.06466233,0.00064076553,0.00006291843,0.0006941883,0.00012015609,0.80154663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85178745,0.0015020608,0.0013839969,0.0075559337,0.000060610164,0.00002840484,0.00015545913,0.00005747059,0.13746859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972819,0.00030537022,0.000035259338,0.00035041952,0.0006374515,0.0013895093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827933,0.00015015958,0.000064282474,0.00014330595,0.0009272598,0.0004356401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014829597,0.00031344427,0.00032821388,0.0011261362,0.02089951,0.0059774197,0.00078218,0.002340934,0.013632911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035536014,0.00022889765,0.00030721806,0.0016184973,0.009592445,0.0023238389,0.002593937,0.0032296297,0.0006776994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043443528,0.000014361106,0.0035397152,0.000031559248,0.000010821956,0.00013145598,0.011524181,0.00019863066,0.0004780788,0.9208986,0.041954055,0.02117509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028557755,0.000030881536,0.011581565,0.00013812889,0.00003459102,0.000117807554,0.015599688,0.0005175377,0.00069609703,0.033434004,0.93772054,0.00010054784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07297991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07297991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12609987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5295088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000728607","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs020","title":"Local Politics in Indonesia: Pathways to Power, by Nankyung Choi.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Decentralization; Devolution (biology); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Power (physics); Restructuring; Dictatorship; Revenue; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.020671447329547874,"score_gpt":0.2731866529485128,"score_spread":0.2525152056189649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000728607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055823447,0.5299042,0.00033874603,0.29435685,0.031683058,0.00004557163,0.0002289809,0.00009517701,0.13776504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08002215,0.33492005,0.001143184,0.069679305,0.013119389,0.00018542308,0.00040506283,0.00031729578,0.50020814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.0001738715,0.00004280034,0.00009164962,0.00010331287,0.00007342998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995414,0.0001072523,0.000044030487,0.000014849644,0.00006209761,0.00023038841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009237042,0.00092274044,0.00038782627,0.00084046717,0.0036828315,0.0061294236,0.0008052223,0.0022443475,0.008472656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011487522,0.00056007516,0.00034067154,0.0011662318,0.0019669994,0.005019909,0.0033027914,0.005430486,0.0045971945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037885486,0.00010735505,0.0019539814,0.0005321909,0.000011860211,0.0005415712,0.013672279,0.00011136289,0.00022263775,0.015649153,0.86555845,0.10160123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005023035,0.000009612103,0.0043979078,0.0005773087,0.000006000811,0.00025764483,0.008110159,0.00010603978,0.000057178804,0.0012521109,0.9852093,0.000011767767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01570365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053672954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01570365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028476613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036924724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03122449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006922539","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju012","title":"Federal Property Policy in Canadian Municipalities, edited by Michael C. Ircha and Robert Young","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013189992195465664,"score_gpt":0.269287690579817,"score_spread":0.2560976983843513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006922539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008453829,0.50844425,0.0013351456,0.3008596,0.012983023,0.000086038024,0.004223483,0.00013919131,0.16347547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22071664,0.3929189,0.003961985,0.01761497,0.004726132,0.00009768271,0.002526158,0.00021005902,0.35722747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983891,0.00023772428,0.000046290483,0.0001289452,0.0006973774,0.0005005591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977848,0.00030405374,0.000074638374,0.000057585326,0.001430515,0.00034838528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021378968,0.00096324773,0.00059543684,0.003968097,0.013925926,0.009168111,0.0015761812,0.0034822312,0.011618162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005098282,0.0007900884,0.00058798806,0.010548424,0.004946908,0.00302812,0.0014636152,0.0027482493,0.0012652503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002074768,0.000014660695,0.0011114907,0.00019323968,0.000010869302,0.00007030164,0.0016263275,0.0008032825,0.00010277946,0.07890946,0.89025795,0.02687894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008706136,0.0000037382792,0.007967383,0.0005988895,0.000016057413,0.000027342756,0.0031024974,0.0003664117,0.000093802635,0.009071462,0.9787123,0.000031322954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17459625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17459625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26314822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007008393","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjm022","title":"Courts and Federalism: Judicial Doctrine in the United States, Australia, and Canada, by Gerald Baier","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Scholarship; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02491157245994363,"score_gpt":0.2890151189613681,"score_spread":0.2641035465014245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007008393","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090888105,0.4949644,0.0010909723,0.26950902,0.0029518092,0.000031129843,0.00018603401,0.000050347375,0.22212744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34108227,0.37121361,0.003086605,0.04200682,0.002834998,0.000058348705,0.00024190875,0.000107673055,0.23936771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999035,0.00016369589,0.000021091506,0.00006411261,0.0005614613,0.00015474063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992488,0.00022980427,0.000051097304,0.000015789254,0.00033302506,0.000121456185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010308694,0.00035070782,0.00026591826,0.0017447311,0.0053285947,0.0047979187,0.00076236797,0.002158014,0.0028266783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004034405,0.00035379326,0.00018698964,0.0036002798,0.006994331,0.0034545246,0.0012065696,0.002781565,0.00042387305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019762625,0.000030136358,0.0013459278,0.00015895102,0.00001179061,0.00010215759,0.00632471,0.0006396368,0.0001229795,0.4535763,0.4860626,0.051605064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008551739,0.0000054984125,0.00899987,0.00076213,0.000012467816,0.00007995723,0.0036626102,0.0005338176,0.00006024533,0.074980974,0.9108704,0.000023474964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8448222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9081496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15517777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031282194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042294007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31218326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018717224","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt017","title":"Metropolitan Governance in the Federalist Americas: Strategies for Equitable and Integrated Development, edited by Peter K. Spink, Peter M. Ward, and Robert H. Wilson.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Metropolitan area; Federalism; Decentralization; Public administration; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Democratization; State (computer science); Multi-level governance; Democracy; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029379516194055866,"score_gpt":0.3199699283303993,"score_spread":0.2905904121363434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018717224","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067148306,0.6018683,0.010780272,0.1365543,0.009946891,0.00011763683,0.00046813276,0.0004583761,0.23309124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14258826,0.56642187,0.01602384,0.008616234,0.005259126,0.00030728412,0.0006508935,0.0003080003,0.25982448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973685,0.00010306771,0.000012931255,0.000033346918,0.00007188921,0.000041876418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999798,0.00006119807,0.000030182253,0.00001392382,0.000048172446,0.000048538044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006411881,0.0006312654,0.0002950235,0.0008999479,0.0017745256,0.004283953,0.0007332496,0.0012257461,0.005415235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008910941,0.00043813535,0.000255643,0.0020599216,0.0019087056,0.003943998,0.0018962177,0.001992653,0.0012050449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007776638,0.000029348614,0.00066696055,0.00037519643,0.000012285873,0.00008829183,0.0049303854,0.00073765696,0.0001618158,0.2427513,0.64605063,0.1041884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023522184,0.0000040499995,0.00095433905,0.00039626102,0.000003406099,0.000038860733,0.0015572442,0.0001603153,0.000043029562,0.021474067,0.9753625,0.0000035583448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025063714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053727694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025063714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051566944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076475563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049835682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019199818","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq035","title":"Citizen Attitudes Toward Issues of Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Government (linguistics); Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Politics; Distribution (mathematics); Public policy; Value (mathematics); Law","score_opus":0.018656398062719567,"score_gpt":0.28449136675261194,"score_spread":0.26583496868989237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019199818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919037,0.00013775604,0.000024429555,0.0015817519,0.000008007038,0.000013072383,0.00014490103,0.0000027536455,0.0061835726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997366,0.00033886562,0.000045726967,0.00029137975,0.000009246174,0.000011236642,0.00016763374,0.0000023302443,0.0017674788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985341,0.0001836555,0.00003934795,0.00009232568,0.0006291368,0.0005214444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938292,0.00096266577,0.001539555,0.0001199967,0.002299167,0.0012493287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279594,0.00013866006,0.00029513743,0.0017028118,0.0077969786,0.0030816698,0.00046456585,0.00077664375,0.0024241414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061036455,0.00017046544,0.000275155,0.0029258984,0.002437405,0.000888457,0.0013583093,0.00128316,0.00009196591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002254549,0.0001718666,0.89315754,0.000045006127,0.000047249305,0.0002046135,0.074604735,0.00025349663,0.00046341209,0.0036713267,0.0060361996,0.02111904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009736849,0.000030022422,0.9320516,0.000056909998,0.000016570963,0.000028705028,0.05867755,0.0002446701,0.00011724978,0.00015715061,0.008584077,0.000025751888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033594087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033594087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019456374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2437433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019516307","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjj013","title":"New Trends in Canadian Federalism, 2d ed., edited by Frances Rocher and Miram Smith, Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2003, 399 pp., $37.95 paper","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Federalism; Art; Economic history; Humanities; Political science; Art history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012621803731050624,"score_gpt":0.25999918819464124,"score_spread":0.24737738446359062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019516307","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007634827,0.76629746,0.0016054104,0.07202323,0.0072398824,0.000039261027,0.003544947,0.0002676554,0.1482186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021024283,0.7036284,0.004564506,0.008110073,0.0029109076,0.00006469159,0.0029423179,0.00030280964,0.256452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980439,0.00012816834,0.00007446321,0.00016673632,0.0012997257,0.00028705513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862695,0.0001447014,0.00009727892,0.000060003233,0.0008029087,0.00026818618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020051636,0.0015294622,0.0011089705,0.0055050435,0.005434036,0.007425013,0.0015626276,0.0025344894,0.061877698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035466352,0.0010454864,0.00074948464,0.015310056,0.004258777,0.0052031274,0.0013750494,0.0030291134,0.014326422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010899383,0.0000049845366,0.0004310917,0.00024083837,0.0000075431462,0.000045153087,0.0007384287,0.000112864895,0.000080806196,0.012661913,0.9237798,0.061885737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024917642,0.0000019840593,0.0016006189,0.00026418536,0.000006183878,0.000049970637,0.00050549407,0.000032472446,0.000035090467,0.0027953612,0.9946905,0.000015571371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94648814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0668567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0668567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10073109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48508155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025608131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr040","title":"Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Historical institutionalism; Scope (computer science); Institutionalism; New institutionalism; Politics; Political science; Institutional theory; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.025120645682214837,"score_gpt":0.22886531440312918,"score_spread":0.20374466872091435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025608131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85718775,0.002786074,0.0021402996,0.0054601952,0.000053676427,0.000059390542,0.0003064661,0.000029761257,0.13197638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977417,0.00028072618,0.00022119255,0.0000780249,0.0000020530922,0.0000061494247,0.000030577117,0.000005360888,0.0016342591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945104,0.0011278035,0.00011630729,0.0004053898,0.0009395557,0.0029005532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731475,0.0006749323,0.0003905471,0.00017213752,0.0007515805,0.0006960492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031326404,0.000173889,0.00030903672,0.0031133802,0.017432043,0.007540001,0.0012449442,0.0011337547,0.0015875499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006543628,0.0002616704,0.00029438402,0.0055084564,0.01738908,0.0018754443,0.0027919873,0.0018395678,0.00005853871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007387708,0.0000284088,0.023877634,0.00006349366,0.000027644786,0.00086332473,0.040377047,0.0025946258,0.00041924606,0.9076731,0.002563192,0.021438219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734096,0.00009126342,0.32423082,0.00081365707,0.00015031347,0.0011569032,0.20517263,0.006500162,0.0025785496,0.083725214,0.37511492,0.0003921874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97865933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98895043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17866303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08616991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95263445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033313409","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs041","title":"A Little Help from My Friends: The Partisan Factor and Intergovernmental Negotiations in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Explanatory power; Political science; State (computer science); Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019295896397905868,"score_gpt":0.2545251382291095,"score_spread":0.23522924183120364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033313409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37333384,0.021396415,0.0027865362,0.3640962,0.0010709502,0.000063742,0.00057868933,0.000073343435,0.23660028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97597575,0.0050300644,0.00055601215,0.006339802,0.0001674712,0.000008436071,0.000065845,0.000034082423,0.011822496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972849,0.0006312694,0.0000474294,0.00017917412,0.00085111125,0.0010061422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944014,0.0016591531,0.00043678525,0.00014183263,0.0016071367,0.0017536414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024655636,0.00016827206,0.00037265458,0.0013258772,0.015910564,0.0057717795,0.0008918441,0.0016053749,0.00590787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010143556,0.0002145356,0.0003444914,0.0031478205,0.0080299275,0.0025190532,0.0019816908,0.0037895811,0.0003278855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016495948,0.00014417717,0.18959583,0.00022459232,0.00018890091,0.00071827753,0.07590753,0.003651842,0.00038755886,0.47393575,0.17897958,0.07610098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006681299,0.00004819386,0.27773497,0.0006499622,0.00016971989,0.0003290048,0.13789172,0.0049321787,0.00063434907,0.07978554,0.4974657,0.00029181977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98991805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99515826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07780669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07780669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062472675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56452966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033865671","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs021","title":"Federalism, Decentralization, and Reproductive Rights in Argentina and Chile","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Unitary state; Opposition (politics); Autonomy; Political science; Cooperative federalism; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.025869796519797376,"score_gpt":0.3057559082121908,"score_spread":0.2798861116923934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033865671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871157,0.00029540312,0.00017433272,0.000505054,0.0000046236564,0.00001098607,0.000093871175,0.0000026985192,0.011797304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992545,0.00008293579,0.00005984155,0.000025236928,0.0000040990835,0.000008783904,0.000055039527,0.000001547963,0.00050804764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991054,0.00035845864,0.000029136407,0.00009817964,0.00009095143,0.00031778883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793124,0.0006348646,0.0008852565,0.0001436226,0.00017123405,0.00023387694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012972888,0.0000743387,0.00030662608,0.0009837431,0.001105624,0.0011666312,0.00030444577,0.00021643363,0.0041547106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055854446,0.00008760001,0.0001693523,0.001499543,0.002081854,0.0007742097,0.0017141405,0.00043327038,0.00010233029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043866478,0.00028074466,0.8483114,0.00012561018,0.000066272514,0.0004852767,0.031579982,0.0013400324,0.0010347802,0.07374942,0.0015039359,0.04108381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045835557,0.00007463474,0.96527374,0.00009398696,0.000018701085,0.00010153723,0.01812726,0.00095008773,0.00019917637,0.0060597067,0.009042232,0.000012986394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057675645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08446132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057675645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031546075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014020643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11467987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036253132","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjl002","title":"Canadian Abortion Policy: National Policy and the Impact of Federalism and Political Implementation on Access to Services","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Federalism; Politics; Public administration; Political science; Health services; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.01907550293836379,"score_gpt":0.394498132722935,"score_spread":0.3754226297845712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036253132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1336797,0.02985948,0.0009126928,0.33298376,0.0006023503,0.0001536901,0.004010263,0.000088659785,0.49770933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94492996,0.013369383,0.0011113074,0.012207664,0.00016945593,0.00006586935,0.0008466952,0.00004703741,0.02725278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98837835,0.001394675,0.00018496811,0.0004007435,0.004755129,0.004886164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985495,0.003214548,0.00074912095,0.00031102687,0.006177199,0.004053015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065573934,0.0002736794,0.0005943329,0.003007198,0.013654703,0.009193985,0.0017870639,0.002811229,0.010697537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023785409,0.00037743367,0.0005363454,0.0047245915,0.0066190944,0.001844122,0.0024226694,0.0030738378,0.0004417963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021805278,0.00010407494,0.030946553,0.00033848803,0.000071980474,0.00023113035,0.0056951023,0.0014226212,0.00033392326,0.78068763,0.12508684,0.05486357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017293407,0.000082155,0.3099453,0.0014470923,0.00022797938,0.0001589604,0.011593319,0.003512997,0.0007180678,0.057742782,0.6141987,0.00019963711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99627423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99777704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73159945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26840052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35622218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8485517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044773446","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq007","title":"Federal-State Tax Interactions in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; State income tax; Tax competition; Endogeneity; State (computer science); Indirect tax; Competition (biology); Income tax; Public economics; Gross income; Tax reform; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01384854515950976,"score_gpt":0.27054339799189125,"score_spread":0.25669485283238147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044773446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594232,0.0012150268,0.0001967801,0.002167232,0.000026759857,0.000031144937,0.0039600665,0.00003350937,0.032946296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359196,0.00040518385,0.00007509228,0.0001006792,0.000005843941,0.000006829751,0.0009107382,0.000008704774,0.0048950207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983785,0.00017796659,0.00004618284,0.0001167787,0.000440759,0.0008398754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966264,0.00074696867,0.0005739089,0.00007933091,0.0011918247,0.0007814678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006845405,0.00019904776,0.00074292405,0.0016715904,0.0031545146,0.0027219986,0.000578081,0.00042628302,0.008522718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043876204,0.00018048192,0.00055483356,0.005571087,0.0009912957,0.0006356403,0.0015518065,0.00093629974,0.0002773455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005789723,0.00021672562,0.85272336,0.00011975803,0.0005124677,0.0005710988,0.0035275312,0.012132014,0.0005921139,0.060263313,0.031185647,0.037576955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006704618,0.00004310487,0.9562432,0.00009931432,0.00025603327,0.000103181555,0.0072298925,0.009240698,0.00036030565,0.0033703924,0.022912487,0.00007439505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99710804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039740935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039740935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039094113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.288342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045098566","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt030","title":"The Question of Federalism in Nepal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Unitary state; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Nepali; Dual federalism; New Federalism; Cooperative federalism; Ethnic group; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01610185448587914,"score_gpt":0.3013066334009589,"score_spread":0.2852047789150798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045098566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25380227,0.0055156765,0.0104027735,0.12772493,0.00034624108,0.00006598165,0.0001037747,0.000049778875,0.6019886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605055,0.00070010824,0.0006023614,0.0050212685,0.00008167109,0.00004847485,0.000022121347,0.000010391319,0.0074629616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960665,0.001682319,0.00012610805,0.00065596274,0.00040727752,0.0010618395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782014,0.0013917111,0.00020567402,0.00022036622,0.00021612704,0.0001460262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004611546,0.000134364,0.00038459332,0.0008088875,0.014214867,0.008634618,0.00081334997,0.0037595762,0.0038689205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009625958,0.00037559628,0.00040819836,0.0010488294,0.021375425,0.0066543063,0.0068200873,0.0060756416,0.00026955007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053296712,0.000003436156,0.0003042231,0.000008406849,0.0000033229521,0.00005413186,0.0028958344,0.00008160566,0.000044108263,0.99400663,0.00079291814,0.0018000377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026835622,0.000023857285,0.0038550997,0.00021618325,0.000014901827,0.00013968493,0.006090798,0.00066110474,0.00039167405,0.879929,0.108619854,0.000030991323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024413418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023674306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024413418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009463056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005674238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0686596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051020871","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp030","title":"Federalism and Fiscal Policy: The Politics of Equalization in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Law; History; Decentralization","score_opus":0.013513490579879136,"score_gpt":0.2681913515043193,"score_spread":0.2546778609244401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051020871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26308948,0.014309705,0.0018237701,0.16396408,0.00039054864,0.00006368221,0.00047325573,0.000067256304,0.5558182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760419,0.002568066,0.00030545506,0.003621776,0.00005560904,0.000007767724,0.000043245465,0.000013093787,0.017343035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604577,0.000414453,0.00004477608,0.00017660507,0.0009248962,0.0023935765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979304,0.00045081697,0.00016208267,0.000050175542,0.0007584233,0.00064814644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018031785,0.00015109811,0.00029049633,0.0014319937,0.02062812,0.0071366914,0.0009160226,0.0019231709,0.004374276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054654423,0.00021635089,0.00024342425,0.0031016513,0.009127401,0.001483041,0.0022769393,0.003297156,0.0001290086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297582,0.000026538493,0.011857583,0.00008300341,0.000023180424,0.00026383213,0.0075370846,0.0019029937,0.00030850543,0.92340934,0.028759453,0.025755487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010157281,0.000046376663,0.13462396,0.0006244839,0.00011686634,0.00018521941,0.030028105,0.004287697,0.0011135199,0.11525033,0.7133889,0.00023300457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99425274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99729425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18122013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22389376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9496686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052118429","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs034","title":"Federal Supremacy and the Occupied Field: A Comparative Critique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Political science; Field (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitutional law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.036846473513787864,"score_gpt":0.35761074975069707,"score_spread":0.3207642762369092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052118429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05347411,0.03820405,0.015520945,0.09608691,0.0011049607,0.00003132216,0.000058375703,0.000055988854,0.7954633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97982085,0.0050863735,0.001288619,0.0049450537,0.0012080492,0.00005311912,0.000028808898,0.00003729091,0.0075316853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923833,0.004577009,0.00016153565,0.00049914053,0.0015967692,0.00078230916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932367,0.005362209,0.00029959955,0.00037074296,0.00053616543,0.00019463418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007396615,0.00040925934,0.0008431704,0.0063322727,0.011295149,0.011606133,0.0016295874,0.0051621865,0.0036624174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011412049,0.00030087095,0.00074180414,0.0036862432,0.046779435,0.012339488,0.0043187723,0.006311819,0.00027461615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022525223,0.000002793424,0.000028715798,0.0000070222727,8.141362e-7,0.000005993302,0.00071629026,0.00004158423,0.0000066704206,0.99758637,0.0005029675,0.0010986773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002738944,0.000019808866,0.0008570931,0.0002551452,0.000010367959,0.000069681264,0.0031309885,0.0004947017,0.000103938524,0.9129938,0.08202512,0.00001196475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012560671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010748327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014982715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014982715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067098676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108707726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055423297","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005037","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism and Federal Political Culture in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Public opinion; Political science; Political culture; Public administration; Law; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.028200119052069716,"score_gpt":0.2700931987013161,"score_spread":0.2418930796492464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055423297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853285,0.0005790201,0.00004507205,0.0028319356,0.000028958211,0.000022256243,0.0014135756,0.000006525799,0.009744109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99438757,0.0007730738,0.000080453254,0.00037431082,0.000027765796,0.000022841197,0.0012481319,0.0000041054227,0.0030817469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989297,0.000111465946,0.000036043068,0.000059031965,0.00044997485,0.00041370332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929467,0.00060581276,0.0016765788,0.00010012059,0.0033910822,0.0012796432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014685652,0.00015347984,0.00026470658,0.0020648825,0.0055393637,0.0026591315,0.0004754521,0.00041187147,0.002378463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069881766,0.0001458954,0.00021283742,0.004380608,0.001204926,0.0007428048,0.0011820896,0.0011418648,0.00009896456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013635677,0.00010070113,0.95190394,0.00004936227,0.000053920456,0.000077416975,0.018039083,0.00013827615,0.00018639077,0.0017247702,0.0101374285,0.017452307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000546607,0.0000146872735,0.9736621,0.000030984975,0.000012154424,0.000013000358,0.017813483,0.0000735598,0.0000648159,0.00005081281,0.008246946,0.000012117111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98597777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99085885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031003464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031003464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026653025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22494692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057117391","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs015","title":"Federalism and the \"New Politics\" of Welfare Development: Childcare and Parental Leave in Australia and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Welfare; Politics; Parental leave; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.022749588398463663,"score_gpt":0.2869332547827435,"score_spread":0.26418366638427987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057117391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91154057,0.0014064412,0.0008636289,0.015235701,0.000031788026,0.000037406473,0.000082084225,0.000009858324,0.07079245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607736,0.00033820275,0.00021236132,0.00030197945,0.0000036382173,0.00001042747,0.000014401592,0.0000036138106,0.0030378972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615484,0.0011420316,0.00005926782,0.00016490705,0.0005431721,0.001935823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732226,0.0006022956,0.00033676735,0.00011353012,0.0007414448,0.0008836749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025051818,0.00009435647,0.000251447,0.0013204594,0.01187749,0.004756387,0.0007836841,0.0009217888,0.0023462956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054948144,0.00016413396,0.00024755343,0.0016394507,0.009778496,0.0013293067,0.0041041914,0.0014905971,0.00006106124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001388655,0.00013009585,0.097881794,0.000104448554,0.00004248179,0.0005768888,0.112692945,0.0028178247,0.0010976724,0.72833395,0.004522647,0.051660497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047772133,0.00008392494,0.60134363,0.00052390445,0.00008718877,0.00022138347,0.1994326,0.0037999558,0.0012086558,0.03501937,0.15810938,0.00012224511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96076685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98630327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10104608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092948295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73314404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063366292","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq025","title":"Federalism and Public Responsiveness to Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04198669779011627,"score_gpt":0.3619078820260473,"score_spread":0.319921184235931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063366292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59310746,0.0019460404,0.013256303,0.04392193,0.00017047844,0.000059714435,0.00016846354,0.0001075315,0.34726208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982387,0.0001257761,0.00021582544,0.00038573562,0.000044984863,0.000010925611,0.000013925379,0.0000048918123,0.0009593107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98963785,0.0066809114,0.0002086306,0.0005744328,0.0012070485,0.0016911679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821383,0.010614803,0.0032596234,0.0013792554,0.0016096522,0.000998433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008843396,0.00010103046,0.00028434684,0.0012983691,0.002243946,0.0036261294,0.00033286342,0.0013472673,0.0057103615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027187703,0.00013308659,0.00033550203,0.0017554191,0.0055389614,0.001766903,0.0024433692,0.0016035639,0.00028973678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109523105,0.000062608844,0.021919303,0.00006486622,0.00006819603,0.00009884053,0.0039691203,0.004825025,0.00061246386,0.94080746,0.0030078397,0.024454854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010348633,0.00012206318,0.103165016,0.00017257077,0.000064118525,0.00010454984,0.00525308,0.0063455794,0.0008450801,0.828108,0.055668995,0.00004751325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007695129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006710951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008843396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005655949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046768904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067705368","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq044","title":"Diversity and Unity in Federal Countries, edited by Luis Moreno and Cesar Colino.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Socioeconomic status; Citizenship; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Ideology; Identity (music); Sociology; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Population; Economics","score_opus":0.032566268190518284,"score_gpt":0.25056204721253406,"score_spread":0.21799577902201578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067705368","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023275034,0.7932656,0.0015203747,0.062154606,0.020821169,0.000020664102,0.00038827068,0.00009216865,0.11940963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10970022,0.63511413,0.0035442484,0.016550852,0.030880596,0.00011099838,0.00097409554,0.00030914252,0.20281573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993807,0.00023649911,0.000040064242,0.000092477494,0.00017866128,0.000071524606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995771,0.00018559152,0.00005061794,0.00003638003,0.00008822026,0.00006210884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007726457,0.0011499686,0.0005232253,0.0019812305,0.0020521434,0.0042091454,0.0007114377,0.0015046477,0.0065503954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016416329,0.000559057,0.00052424194,0.0029921972,0.0023317013,0.0045492025,0.0020287626,0.002857352,0.0023473664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030689524,0.000029548013,0.00058525807,0.00035751823,0.000016818218,0.00009880394,0.004247167,0.00037871953,0.0001608823,0.12243617,0.7977517,0.07390678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027017097,0.0000036024358,0.0010161952,0.00046242078,0.00000353954,0.00010730795,0.00078163965,0.000059986454,0.000036222984,0.015429839,0.9820911,0.0000054161546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018812502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031213617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018812502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003859706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041318857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037406027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073159803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjs036","title":"(Sub)national Economic Union: Institutions, Ideas, and Internal Trade Policy in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Economic union; Trade union; Commercial policy; Public administration; Economic history; Law; International trade; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.024599619881162275,"score_gpt":0.28916455628630816,"score_spread":0.2645649364051459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073159803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32605264,0.016327381,0.0021152387,0.06875758,0.0006022022,0.00016704414,0.0022343823,0.00019553798,0.58354795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949313,0.0054014483,0.0014784698,0.003850358,0.000042222346,0.000041252722,0.0006599837,0.000050164377,0.09354484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964736,0.00016909525,0.00006095329,0.00023336767,0.0010231865,0.002039857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967192,0.0003686215,0.00019736297,0.000077310564,0.0012669443,0.001370586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002098796,0.00029238744,0.000437526,0.0028399024,0.019677049,0.010933614,0.0015884709,0.0018936745,0.0099782925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004183805,0.00031672546,0.0004886101,0.006328076,0.0050662966,0.0016065164,0.0032183973,0.0027153133,0.00032513408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076007236,0.00007709308,0.028612826,0.0002274771,0.00003360007,0.00040961927,0.017152458,0.0021330656,0.00033694235,0.8239674,0.07014685,0.056826595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057914393,0.00003920433,0.115050726,0.0006273387,0.00009747684,0.00016596114,0.036436226,0.0047771726,0.00067495037,0.033856623,0.8080669,0.00014955667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6410852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3589148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40944234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74356794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079486721","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv016","title":"Negotiating Territorial Change in Multinational States: Party Preferences, Negotiating Power and the Role of the Negotiation Mode","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Power (physics); Mode (computer interface); Political science; Economic geography; Space (punctuation); Economic system; Political economy; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.030500101807151216,"score_gpt":0.2969719739030321,"score_spread":0.26647187209588086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079486721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91984797,0.00026114064,0.018762486,0.0008195434,0.0000095597925,0.000039896375,0.00003392416,0.000016988573,0.060208473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988041,0.000031959753,0.00075579155,0.000013377989,0.0000018153307,0.00001020105,0.0000071045083,0.0000030977387,0.00037271657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527717,0.003181973,0.00019671184,0.00035982966,0.00045382848,0.00053053367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941923,0.003402187,0.0009971603,0.0005801649,0.0003943874,0.0004336576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059510097,0.00015236318,0.0002944334,0.0012989246,0.0022505405,0.0045679,0.00059848477,0.00071743166,0.0039416626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011996754,0.00020686719,0.00029798714,0.001494007,0.00724568,0.0049860766,0.0030357202,0.0008703604,0.00022928513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000303685,0.00011366358,0.13641228,0.00018418356,0.00012611684,0.00050090376,0.08272055,0.0084136445,0.004644476,0.6920586,0.0005836218,0.07393823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008186381,0.00019953508,0.26113287,0.00025988565,0.00007962962,0.0005510706,0.1875228,0.022493916,0.0024539381,0.49315593,0.03193431,0.0001341836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037493012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067046285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059510097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020867048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010184384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031472266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081028403","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju039","title":"From Calgary to Canberra: Resource Taxation and Fiscal Federalism in Canada and Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Decentralization; Politics; Revenue; Incentive; Fiscal federalism; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Finance; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.01829936736056144,"score_gpt":0.2613873447796973,"score_spread":0.24308797741913585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081028403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90721637,0.0031307766,0.0002414016,0.014418607,0.00006666249,0.000044687524,0.0001915888,0.000013636545,0.07467626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853695,0.0010907422,0.00018926123,0.00081958284,0.0000073196315,0.000008840299,0.000045439938,0.0000058053997,0.009296032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976482,0.0002626187,0.000042586773,0.00014732432,0.00064802245,0.0012512235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962296,0.00046599025,0.00038948073,0.000070393406,0.0012831396,0.0015614115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012831044,0.00013814445,0.00035099563,0.001545186,0.011664506,0.0042400346,0.0011290136,0.00097485475,0.0029405067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055788034,0.00020878074,0.00023325748,0.0033825098,0.0036247391,0.0011415259,0.0025815095,0.0019704988,0.0001272421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036187738,0.0003317567,0.3251469,0.00043210344,0.00015860415,0.0025924959,0.1559953,0.0037406832,0.0014547952,0.3138564,0.040663373,0.15526572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031024665,0.00006750056,0.75751346,0.0003380225,0.00007674271,0.00024007923,0.100990415,0.0016527988,0.00045152873,0.006509005,0.1320207,0.0001087068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99928325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15604697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15604697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16590345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97886586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085912979","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji006","title":"Book Reviews: Legacy and New Directions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Library science; Political science; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03767819155314047,"score_gpt":0.3208671285821168,"score_spread":0.28318893702897635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085912979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007390873,0.7085428,0.0005707361,0.1368373,0.129511,0.000050225375,0.0002779659,0.0003213226,0.023814604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011023306,0.66616863,0.0016004292,0.08108982,0.20649225,0.00015638987,0.00048060744,0.0002511587,0.042658415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97086,0.0055529326,0.0032035855,0.002552783,0.016652634,0.0011780821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85789263,0.048975628,0.009897625,0.010174913,0.057990476,0.015068635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030703353,0.0026208314,0.0050138487,0.013059528,0.0034102448,0.03525452,0.0051781307,0.010906082,0.07600107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099707544,0.002300051,0.0017636418,0.019988015,0.0073446548,0.031096803,0.007130933,0.016833577,0.09804728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023487926,0.00002114364,0.00005392245,0.0017044415,0.000017439703,0.000040793,0.0001427892,0.00002796201,0.000061448496,0.007207788,0.8938821,0.09681668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012852367,0.000011479813,0.00006606964,0.002356916,0.000008485139,0.00010877584,0.000092306036,0.000013406933,0.000010956444,0.002508809,0.9947984,0.000011551835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021300197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004146657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07600107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008009265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014195002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25424892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087785354","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt040","title":"The Quest for a Political Settlement in Cyprus: Is a Dyadic Federation Viable?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Turkish; Political science; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Intermediary; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02113584943691246,"score_gpt":0.3076990027358404,"score_spread":0.28656315329892795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087785354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826272,0.0007153975,0.0036013795,0.0073698084,0.00011923439,0.000055844717,0.000026767691,0.00001933534,0.10546513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766123,0.000088448665,0.00023993479,0.00010655584,0.000012022451,0.000013378978,0.000006608714,0.0000024877277,0.0018693386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416983,0.0037100192,0.00011646144,0.0004167597,0.0002500818,0.0013368482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724007,0.0008221457,0.0005940036,0.00032064636,0.00030851612,0.00071465026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065150848,0.0001588816,0.00034498784,0.0007361131,0.020397898,0.0073099267,0.00087458605,0.0019793804,0.0071632266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054434193,0.00026044578,0.0001988956,0.0008153217,0.008330238,0.0039734645,0.006801599,0.0015732986,0.00081867824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040543018,0.00028074931,0.056439925,0.00024014564,0.000062014726,0.0044014384,0.17414136,0.0018533919,0.000973848,0.6661756,0.012851865,0.08217419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012775463,0.00040300726,0.11185906,0.0007058898,0.00013447508,0.0022590347,0.61763674,0.0070698387,0.00096236396,0.09049939,0.16822936,0.00011311601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017782338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032197714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020397898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046879635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060533434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035357654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088511019","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq011","title":"Policy Coordination in Federal Systems: Comparing Intergovernmental Processes and Outcomes in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Political science; Business; Public economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.012149030339278272,"score_gpt":0.26633103379495027,"score_spread":0.254182003455672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088511019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97772926,0.0005914015,0.00035349472,0.0014875121,0.000016668737,0.00010248145,0.0008699009,0.000034093453,0.018815208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982121,0.00020219065,0.00021608826,0.000076362696,0.0000026954083,0.000027270627,0.00049027876,0.00000622189,0.00076680916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156684,0.001396899,0.00023604582,0.000512897,0.0026747598,0.0036126028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456144,0.0021333017,0.0021623715,0.0007290682,0.007933968,0.002479762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824805,0.0003218502,0.0007495233,0.0046133697,0.007972299,0.004976068,0.0015241983,0.00090218266,0.001535981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02586044,0.00024970036,0.0005759452,0.011668877,0.0049171066,0.0016221745,0.003683969,0.0012927011,0.00012617644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068221043,0.0004036724,0.84189194,0.00017320059,0.00040806402,0.00025286604,0.027720507,0.015247425,0.00049532566,0.05014962,0.01017103,0.052404195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006927593,0.000066906425,0.9570497,0.00009396652,0.000093946626,0.000021756727,0.027339505,0.0050937603,0.00038580425,0.0022197647,0.007498423,0.000067155226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99672407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8278491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17215092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13567413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96018755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089444739","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004996","title":"Public Opinion on Federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States in 2003","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Public opinion; Political science; Library science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.036488604183864105,"score_gpt":0.268670089023311,"score_spread":0.23218148483944692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089444739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95964324,0.002119688,0.00010304219,0.008889487,0.00010533327,0.000043410582,0.0012248413,0.000010057121,0.027860815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930988,0.0015195278,0.00008390977,0.0009144474,0.00004064121,0.000019206138,0.00058841775,0.0000036992406,0.0037314596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982687,0.00017923325,0.00004731325,0.000080921076,0.00082554924,0.00059816765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931011,0.00081480335,0.0011110716,0.00007012545,0.0037085873,0.001194343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952716,0.0001472501,0.00026447224,0.0019510457,0.005759842,0.002772041,0.0004508104,0.00069972815,0.0017490642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069884113,0.000110063855,0.00021760727,0.0039238017,0.001406499,0.0007881051,0.0009809827,0.001363598,0.00006636904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062852266,0.0001563357,0.80103904,0.00030372257,0.00013901376,0.00066384807,0.08417636,0.0005022145,0.0011451144,0.011847978,0.041653015,0.057744797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014693482,0.000038545804,0.87987214,0.00014303731,0.00003128532,0.000052785545,0.068282716,0.00022396543,0.00027045677,0.000179709,0.050848763,0.000041801268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98424673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99018025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048076853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048076853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033449706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3488236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100922201","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq001","title":"Federalism and Representation in the Theory of the Founding Fathers: A Comparative Study of U.S. and Canadian Constitutional Thought","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Representation (politics); Sovereignty; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Conversation; Political philosophy; Dual federalism; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0582398632575388,"score_gpt":0.3466941844176328,"score_spread":0.28845432116009395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100922201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6250714,0.004517867,0.001101786,0.017817156,0.00010724393,0.000039694038,0.00015348806,0.000020214866,0.3511712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947109,0.0009067501,0.00022324969,0.00041700224,0.000010891632,0.0000072963157,0.000026135118,0.0000094145835,0.0036884395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945444,0.0013100812,0.00008578512,0.00037137343,0.0017106908,0.001977689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930226,0.003313726,0.00048458233,0.00021004048,0.0021012102,0.0008678225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005452661,0.00020432855,0.000561827,0.004366381,0.026671274,0.007610704,0.0015171423,0.0015918419,0.0039917245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014955725,0.0002451714,0.00034699633,0.008308385,0.02214534,0.0026031728,0.002653447,0.0030682292,0.00013278745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006323626,0.000037544432,0.008128685,0.00006323686,0.000014380158,0.0001922848,0.2782025,0.0003385447,0.00024215404,0.68833613,0.0052942378,0.01908699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063083,0.00006747583,0.114817135,0.00072156405,0.00009806109,0.0003164055,0.5519142,0.0021013266,0.00047928977,0.07496978,0.25430146,0.00015021594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98434794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1594294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1594294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10500326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97494274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104635029","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjr053","title":"Beyond Decentralization--The Comparative Study of Interdependence in Federal Systems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048700573372547934,"score_gpt":0.3416385983432719,"score_spread":0.29293802497072396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104635029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82968473,0.0068088523,0.028306074,0.0014374277,0.000031632444,0.0000651102,0.00032405925,0.000036972902,0.13330509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974778,0.00065382407,0.001351697,0.00002638542,0.000011589689,0.000018243716,0.00009185742,0.0000054845627,0.00036315035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939627,0.004196846,0.00020871566,0.00039216081,0.0008979057,0.00034175723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885334,0.006419553,0.0017647871,0.0017746097,0.0012176078,0.00029000043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004787909,0.00014984155,0.0004590085,0.004020553,0.0012019704,0.0022269578,0.0004393627,0.0003378256,0.0028826047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013923012,0.00014886956,0.00033407373,0.006301587,0.0036527505,0.0044492916,0.0023435547,0.00073123083,0.00013593481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021277419,0.00008338963,0.100825146,0.0005782219,0.0003215458,0.00009477233,0.0113131525,0.013669216,0.0014473143,0.78701025,0.00091905263,0.0835251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007296831,0.00031659615,0.5033876,0.0011126859,0.00022046544,0.00046414536,0.013852266,0.012866555,0.0019213392,0.40154523,0.06418026,0.000059949958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027623025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039708945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004787909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028183989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001390944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025321186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118577803","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq027","title":"Federalism and Economic Growth: The Importance of Context in Nigerian Public Finance Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public finance; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.014415850813404612,"score_gpt":0.25621464657819976,"score_spread":0.24179879576479515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118577803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6868933,0.01896052,0.0032986582,0.05713712,0.00030511484,0.000042294858,0.000062121115,0.000014113521,0.23328677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971992,0.0015307382,0.00015976904,0.0003467865,0.000042616837,0.000006409004,0.0000062521567,0.0000017451569,0.00070630515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997764,0.0014404472,0.00007358516,0.000101398284,0.00017280222,0.0004477398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784124,0.001048877,0.00061841984,0.00006572496,0.00020497579,0.00022074024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023583386,0.00013909124,0.00033478343,0.0011492535,0.0037665567,0.006933974,0.00025132837,0.0009388228,0.0018371325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049157836,0.00014932892,0.00012585561,0.0022482558,0.007969995,0.003963349,0.0035940788,0.0019980813,0.000065208005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005302382,0.000034346853,0.012510317,0.00012041787,0.00000958258,0.00036531905,0.010009209,0.00093577924,0.00016804686,0.95675194,0.0009940687,0.01804795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006205817,0.00015548692,0.16332202,0.0022043968,0.00007024565,0.00043171333,0.09956455,0.0036636887,0.0009758229,0.5702632,0.15920871,0.00007810317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011703484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031668212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011703484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008993967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006851625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06525612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123513496","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004947","title":"Intergovernmental Relations in Canada: The Emergence of Collaborative Federalism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":233,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018815603367121268,"score_gpt":0.24516744862610176,"score_spread":0.2263518452589805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123513496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2979166,0.009386391,0.005771961,0.12563877,0.0004920829,0.00015794787,0.00061643193,0.00015773247,0.5598621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833003,0.0018763265,0.0010448351,0.0022640405,0.00004779798,0.000019869372,0.00009818702,0.000020774469,0.011327742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943499,0.000703121,0.000081960075,0.00042713765,0.001973497,0.002464447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930113,0.00091487664,0.0004888767,0.00028333615,0.0028551235,0.002446437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003471182,0.00018668355,0.00032632594,0.0019344913,0.018643524,0.0072041512,0.0012487919,0.001958065,0.0050349715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008484135,0.0002757743,0.00032980103,0.0055997064,0.010162666,0.0023312157,0.004183805,0.0034513383,0.00022086587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064176405,0.000050768293,0.019047473,0.00011125221,0.0000344612,0.0005005054,0.023340058,0.0019775813,0.0003692653,0.8346731,0.046542954,0.07328851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007755564,0.000037178226,0.1606258,0.00034516116,0.00006231141,0.00019137374,0.029059665,0.0045140954,0.00051876134,0.096327044,0.70811474,0.00012627144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99374384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7922796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20772038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25514543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139040101","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq006","title":"A Two-Way Street: Federalism and Women's Politics in Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Arrow; Dual federalism; Suffrage; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.006651919003951761,"score_gpt":0.2127242906699705,"score_spread":0.20607237166601874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139040101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4611462,0.017601635,0.0009071365,0.14376485,0.0006889869,0.000059674578,0.00053295924,0.00004594845,0.3752527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602828,0.0033765524,0.00025589176,0.0052489615,0.00007053317,0.000017021464,0.00006240983,0.000022097685,0.030663732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964115,0.00045626628,0.000030750503,0.00020650946,0.00073234213,0.002162739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782336,0.00066134485,0.00017469206,0.000038710783,0.0005233697,0.0007784365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019801878,0.00027383157,0.00042560455,0.002462604,0.03993664,0.010071258,0.0012440574,0.002762309,0.0067774532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034426898,0.00027539436,0.0003406126,0.0047266413,0.019207561,0.00210919,0.0031312644,0.0033079956,0.00018575032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011372514,0.000054892025,0.029684283,0.00016373734,0.000034187793,0.0007531763,0.2755654,0.0005080153,0.0005137708,0.5811627,0.05609058,0.055355586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019731984,0.000030312965,0.07472422,0.00043779577,0.00004319861,0.00015371514,0.3575817,0.00039729927,0.0004268892,0.0130914,0.5529763,0.00011733532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99724114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99915254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18783857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18783857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17887895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94199216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147452464","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju040","title":"Regions as Primary Political Communities: A Multi-Level Comparative Analysis of Turnout in Regional Elections","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Turnout; Salience (neuroscience); Legislature; Political science; Politics; Voting; Democracy; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.18623785470354767,"score_gpt":0.40743630702304007,"score_spread":0.2211984523194924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147452464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980743,0.00017927731,0.000121650686,0.000016467398,0.0000012331329,0.0000041187427,0.000108956425,0.00000179344,0.001492224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.000036361747,0.00006958905,0.0000032499033,0.0000016331273,0.0000025257082,0.00009479538,0.0000017494701,0.00016254175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987833,0.00063845987,0.000033950335,0.00015130544,0.00010010755,0.0002929004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977471,0.00092745293,0.0005687423,0.00015270528,0.0002603425,0.00034356103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014383263,0.0000891195,0.000346335,0.002061162,0.0006142196,0.00107967,0.0002590204,0.00022018336,0.0029890311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003370892,0.00009724606,0.00037418192,0.0020348625,0.00044322753,0.00065091986,0.0009967806,0.00026514207,0.00025680216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046318653,0.00005620583,0.96503985,0.000107017964,0.00031999548,0.00022205936,0.015481543,0.00070473814,0.0020144251,0.002125482,0.00034899195,0.013116494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027758576,0.000045556633,0.9926762,0.00000939228,0.000034475524,0.000035316523,0.005961577,0.00031519838,0.000072193645,0.00011776206,0.00072591595,0.0000036748336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033083547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083672255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033083547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006610819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029568182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06578195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156576814","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjp001","title":"Constitutional Design and Change in Federal Systems: Issues and Questions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Normative; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Field (mathematics); Federalism; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07750398033551414,"score_gpt":0.32492325424201685,"score_spread":0.2474192739065027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156576814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0922045,0.06501435,0.052123908,0.5487436,0.0018783715,0.00014409206,0.00020746466,0.00016704742,0.23951665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665092,0.010422283,0.0074621174,0.009343468,0.0018310064,0.00015066144,0.000082533465,0.000040377487,0.0041583073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727666,0.01735632,0.0009942633,0.0029574435,0.0031831088,0.0027423198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627502,0.027462343,0.0029019779,0.003543067,0.0022907131,0.0010518308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027608007,0.00035642585,0.0013206878,0.0028374174,0.0084894765,0.016298296,0.0034438577,0.010614706,0.0054811197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042464223,0.00070147077,0.00094047596,0.005148159,0.0785703,0.027773352,0.0048017614,0.008080163,0.0004990477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041403687,0.000018872288,0.0002830985,0.000039049093,0.000003733306,0.0000121684325,0.0007686972,0.00036799457,0.000016964103,0.9933676,0.0007611863,0.0043564574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007897102,0.000013313715,0.0005908542,0.0001239453,0.000004025913,0.00002634919,0.0013035333,0.0004456957,0.000066171204,0.9801769,0.017228348,0.000012817796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009417344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057560075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027608007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01653358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008805402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14600682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160152441","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq012","title":"Going Alone or Moving Together: Canadian and American Middle Tier Strategies on Climate Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Political science; Regional science; Geography; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Public relations","score_opus":0.05346229013758931,"score_gpt":0.3193139495873245,"score_spread":0.2658516594497352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160152441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6421747,0.0024922513,0.0015701022,0.048832238,0.00024119829,0.00014112497,0.00017936663,0.00005348511,0.30431548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898386,0.00046118564,0.0005113475,0.0017738272,0.000007276638,0.00001585186,0.000037902268,0.00000705469,0.0073469547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932591,0.0012397262,0.00006670854,0.00032836662,0.0011050481,0.004001064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966528,0.00043340493,0.00014587207,0.000110807356,0.0008584045,0.0017987347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049271374,0.0003595508,0.00032392718,0.0017616911,0.040272355,0.007712514,0.0019743547,0.0023320953,0.0047730585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055652414,0.00017927036,0.0004487853,0.0029989788,0.009162286,0.0025053872,0.0056213345,0.0023717112,0.00020036506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042848664,0.00036045667,0.08462708,0.00015287066,0.00009400608,0.0010378069,0.27378318,0.0022422955,0.0019018884,0.43566275,0.048091955,0.15161718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061330735,0.000118080614,0.12169222,0.00026511573,0.00011701643,0.00014918052,0.4729597,0.001761457,0.0012321251,0.022248033,0.37921402,0.00018176681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85116065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14883934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19820915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160417104","doi":"10.1093/publius/pju030","title":"Pathways of Federal Reform: Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Unilateralism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Rule of law; Electoral reform; Democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025121900994839005,"score_gpt":0.2634135380838276,"score_spread":0.2382916370889886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160417104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824633,0.004720503,0.0018697775,0.00970839,0.00010000426,0.00011231671,0.00036007646,0.000087812354,0.15840822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228656,0.0008263736,0.0006138013,0.00025458622,0.000005446303,0.000016215354,0.00008120398,0.000008381968,0.0059074736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781287,0.00028989653,0.000042118896,0.0001390712,0.00037973837,0.0013363234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977731,0.00022752376,0.00035026993,0.00009592944,0.0008987672,0.0006544129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021301839,0.00015735762,0.00018492594,0.0029097646,0.0065115853,0.003734036,0.0004483308,0.00078225415,0.002193259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004123612,0.00016099514,0.00022599782,0.0038323796,0.004366727,0.0016019791,0.0020486924,0.0010521805,0.00008786103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024047981,0.000083553896,0.10473326,0.00016981733,0.000065433895,0.0010525224,0.037588,0.0031441955,0.001052681,0.75107324,0.010829149,0.08996776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054829383,0.000106446554,0.69266504,0.0004772105,0.00010968506,0.00043277026,0.0535604,0.003845706,0.0022161072,0.021647284,0.22474237,0.00014210772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9302951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96509594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06970489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053672075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056914065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38941997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165650283","doi":"10.1093/publius/pji028","title":"Electoral Accountability in a Federal System: National and Provincial Economic Voting in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Voting; Political science; Federalism; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01539428594599356,"score_gpt":0.26788311578862783,"score_spread":0.25248882984263427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165650283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916123,0.00026953113,0.00013143317,0.0012220539,0.000016165499,0.000021376343,0.0008687625,0.000008021482,0.0058502806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983729,0.00008002512,0.000050461727,0.00003589716,0.0000036958168,0.000002932861,0.00025448864,0.0000021942624,0.001197427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971981,0.00024579087,0.000088633,0.00019584048,0.0007098946,0.0015616438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911542,0.0010044167,0.00170136,0.00033646132,0.004300612,0.001503038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002309416,0.00013043244,0.0006288934,0.0016635995,0.00424816,0.0019231699,0.0009743381,0.0003779082,0.0024048667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012054619,0.0001885465,0.00036982525,0.004605981,0.0010518354,0.00055620284,0.0013222988,0.000974029,0.00013820636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000188879,0.000052311727,0.9637057,0.000034760462,0.00007310742,0.00010671867,0.0051432247,0.0011174885,0.0001628029,0.0040344573,0.0046163793,0.020764198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007993445,0.000012270433,0.991314,0.0000147367,0.000023708631,0.000015561376,0.0030141054,0.0015915682,0.000093748,0.00019276829,0.00370593,0.000013552618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051631805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051631805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052614857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37461674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167940972","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq008","title":"Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Similarity (geometry); Value (mathematics); Variation (astronomy); Perception; Political science; Positive economics; Variable (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03580295199593247,"score_gpt":0.32716795633381146,"score_spread":0.291365004337879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167940972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27876875,0.022149159,0.0039373823,0.3246214,0.003491073,0.0002668841,0.0013342648,0.000104400206,0.36532667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476225,0.0037966198,0.0026777952,0.035240825,0.00025463893,0.000108211956,0.00028443488,0.000066288456,0.009948742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788173,0.0074274335,0.00066258636,0.0011220407,0.005609489,0.006361263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796252,0.009821542,0.0007551356,0.00050503446,0.007479598,0.001813618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018438797,0.0003216732,0.0007790939,0.0059244833,0.034266762,0.014437555,0.0032415418,0.0048905755,0.0033833263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047415253,0.00031285585,0.000677425,0.010595908,0.018717147,0.0054133222,0.0055287955,0.0064807427,0.00011634535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014661363,0.000042893265,0.009219905,0.00022171803,0.00006736117,0.00046778307,0.05937745,0.0010567942,0.00030076393,0.84052587,0.050473414,0.038099356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010124381,0.000112558635,0.06715225,0.001806669,0.00018970782,0.00023147438,0.364037,0.001769594,0.00145828,0.11711057,0.4457089,0.00032177637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99279225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8573874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14261256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15639926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168177525","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjq013","title":"Comparing Federations: Lessons from Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; State (computer science); New Federalism; Politics; Comparative politics; Public administration; Dual federalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.038002058820972746,"score_gpt":0.29112156950969986,"score_spread":0.2531195106887271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168177525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20543328,0.071790814,0.0061261686,0.13916974,0.0038813758,0.00031109262,0.0047172657,0.00020624585,0.56836396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94941884,0.022599012,0.0050045075,0.011809848,0.00052174274,0.00013059948,0.0018867846,0.00023578969,0.008392982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845798,0.003768115,0.00044315404,0.0012893855,0.006265643,0.0036538998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613604,0.012694398,0.0015660166,0.0013782963,0.020308752,0.0026920969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013942776,0.00052450283,0.0012729198,0.016943498,0.02633996,0.015344831,0.0037988527,0.0027690872,0.0052259183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057206623,0.0003499398,0.0009189564,0.0357654,0.011149369,0.0091941105,0.006863898,0.0040247925,0.00024412572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002805652,0.000071232,0.059654623,0.00079912925,0.00040820905,0.0007328903,0.13070206,0.0017022731,0.00018229462,0.5189,0.13518713,0.1513796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006681741,0.000075818236,0.15891233,0.0037591804,0.00041988093,0.00021301747,0.2834089,0.001962188,0.00050156715,0.099322125,0.45108604,0.00027211203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98887444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99419606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12444371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12444371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16686577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90290654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264187945","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv030","title":"<i>Comparative Federalism and Intergovernmental Agreements: Analyzing Australia, Canada, Germany, South Africa, Switzerland and the United States (Routledge Series in Federal Studies)</i>, by Jeffrey Parker.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Relevance (law); Dual federalism; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.057544352639876166,"score_gpt":0.3118424948043053,"score_spread":0.25429814216442914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264187945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19232132,0.2304851,0.0038759552,0.21232052,0.0019388587,0.00019384369,0.0028396633,0.00008952843,0.35593525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84760624,0.07543476,0.0036211684,0.008084836,0.00042483734,0.00025293455,0.0012327193,0.000121446385,0.06322104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988984,0.00035937177,0.000030489466,0.000091364345,0.0003117105,0.00030858413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986817,0.0006058312,0.00021547239,0.00003816845,0.00029694012,0.00016191845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013398685,0.00035918542,0.00026017256,0.0043681953,0.007398657,0.0034172272,0.0008642998,0.0013630242,0.0040985453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037182644,0.00021555898,0.00026440242,0.015552926,0.0067290864,0.0042401957,0.0018984664,0.0015438058,0.00030710237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003304244,0.000035789224,0.011654971,0.00046161466,0.00002194394,0.00040697376,0.16120228,0.0006764392,0.00014977825,0.4859608,0.29470697,0.044689417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053159943,0.000011074287,0.08145765,0.001145638,0.000013884424,0.000173017,0.10668081,0.00052218814,0.00018762487,0.024236403,0.7855262,0.000040047118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8798733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94117403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120126724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03943329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029615337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28610986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311479810","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjw002","title":"Governing an International Transboundary River: Opportunism, Safeguards, and Drought Adaptation in the Rio Grande","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Economic shortage; Corporate governance; Water scarcity; Adaptation (eye); Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Government (linguistics); Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0174668177881999,"score_gpt":0.20546185590707436,"score_spread":0.18799503811887447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311479810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735693,0.00019273508,0.0041164584,0.001696164,0.0000039753577,0.000017372791,0.000022801005,0.00000863245,0.02037269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990621,0.00007109506,0.000535301,0.000022548124,0.0000018437613,0.000007177984,0.00000671026,0.0000012380245,0.00029199693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994135,0.0002521091,0.00002191441,0.000092001625,0.000064225525,0.00015625323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983771,0.0004577579,0.0008347342,0.00012443667,0.00008471094,0.00012120496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015182486,0.00009926162,0.00017390525,0.00047688666,0.0012140024,0.0018477478,0.0004591936,0.00045721786,0.001052373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030965465,0.00009993241,0.00023891225,0.00063567027,0.0026922787,0.0010712154,0.0014736644,0.00041528846,0.000031686817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001672349,0.00034889134,0.4338545,0.00018313152,0.00019319923,0.0015860345,0.020881336,0.058015704,0.0050335242,0.40719956,0.0024717685,0.070065096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050058647,0.00024611477,0.70886,0.00018977655,0.00015552685,0.0004843619,0.04505474,0.062555574,0.0020334749,0.14831139,0.03197781,0.000081119644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031104058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054235566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031104058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019885357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015056009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061846018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2385249247","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjv037","title":"Secession Risk and Fiscal Federalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Federalism; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Decentralization","score_opus":0.029741393266418087,"score_gpt":0.290269295680313,"score_spread":0.2605279024138949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2385249247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6982199,0.0058005364,0.014806345,0.09788289,0.00025266063,0.000042622418,0.00020785895,0.0000814816,0.18270561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970362,0.00044181646,0.00018584925,0.00058499223,0.000083814055,0.000005733449,0.000014821992,0.000005480493,0.0016413508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696714,0.0011665417,0.00017228509,0.0003776426,0.0005163057,0.0008000643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98441327,0.0050500096,0.0066560404,0.0015043691,0.0012858338,0.0010904464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052279388,0.00012409962,0.00045054336,0.0009896411,0.002244954,0.0050600898,0.00047163386,0.0023964196,0.0051694303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021576885,0.00016080719,0.00033469824,0.0009443995,0.008330656,0.0039920434,0.0031055019,0.0034907483,0.00034350934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006551967,0.000045885416,0.016450923,0.000030248657,0.000023738661,0.00012585988,0.0018567528,0.0009813439,0.00011065892,0.96030635,0.003353606,0.0166492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035609268,0.000045275407,0.018196544,0.00020796896,0.000023831812,0.0002625018,0.0025719793,0.0026614668,0.00027865704,0.9543888,0.021298792,0.000028547327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003950222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002778732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052279388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039325655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023626306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028532922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584855646","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx017","title":"The Crown and Canadian Federalism, by D. Michael Jackson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Sovereignty; Politics; Law; Dual federalism; Political science; New Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.022385696715418568,"score_gpt":0.28680059655578516,"score_spread":0.2644148998403666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584855646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001315025,0.27697214,0.0009915535,0.28437132,0.022205854,0.000052558833,0.0005004924,0.000117396965,0.41347373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03324497,0.17017658,0.0023002282,0.0643007,0.0059599206,0.0000634041,0.000390591,0.00020865876,0.72335505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989698,0.00008809253,0.00002430628,0.00016086882,0.0005604864,0.00019641532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993662,0.000107208965,0.000025232075,0.000018508463,0.00034999757,0.00013278468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000904087,0.00069078006,0.00037768652,0.0015358705,0.009916572,0.0054959585,0.00095648115,0.0022744245,0.010991586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002443459,0.00045547914,0.00033172677,0.0026519382,0.005034506,0.004000913,0.0015521854,0.003869935,0.0034546645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005806555,0.000004335768,0.000103907805,0.000040679828,0.0000017833812,0.000027091397,0.0007322201,0.000049108512,0.000049439754,0.063329406,0.9211511,0.014505193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.567693e-7,7.5711523e-7,0.00019404343,0.00004828041,7.2531964e-7,0.000016105318,0.00021248915,0.000012362301,0.000009131295,0.0021344563,0.9973672,0.000003549633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8536806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9313899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14631939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045130875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049589854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32744896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586982757","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjw043","title":"Three-Quarters Empty or One-Quarter Full? Martha Derthick on the Courts, Federalism, and Public Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Scholarship; Pessimism; Legalism (Western philosophy); Politics; State (computer science); Political science; Adversarial system; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.06639329898080316,"score_gpt":0.32634938873749086,"score_spread":0.2599560897566877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586982757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019926522,0.052515656,0.001200832,0.83588356,0.002166584,0.000004788664,0.00004137761,0.00003254103,0.08822814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.783721,0.0435501,0.0015046098,0.116591424,0.0040971194,0.00002448147,0.00003994019,0.00006583788,0.05040545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871445,0.00063651125,0.000019778625,0.000118644704,0.00029278162,0.00021788206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982008,0.0011111011,0.00010650382,0.000095379495,0.00019545421,0.000290704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017809963,0.00013423608,0.00020935564,0.0007179682,0.005183997,0.005039792,0.0005577498,0.0022354545,0.004021078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043372973,0.00014762772,0.00016481066,0.00077336095,0.008645522,0.0055095847,0.0022392992,0.004183422,0.0006064903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018332868,0.000029302351,0.00095636706,0.000027864828,0.000007667514,0.00009825309,0.0034152577,0.00014865189,0.00014468572,0.8146401,0.15231033,0.028203115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044289,0.000017503009,0.0022152967,0.0004077748,0.000007764263,0.00013142728,0.0074459375,0.00031243832,0.00033776226,0.45127738,0.5378141,0.000024608833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011935317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016359262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011935317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035973454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028894663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607314962","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx025","title":"Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Post communist; Political science; Communism; Political economy; Economic system; Economic geography; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05154112912042661,"score_gpt":0.3456976157494429,"score_spread":0.2941564866290163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607314962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731951,0.00052870106,0.00021537617,0.0008857268,0.000009759473,0.000008374998,0.000045418434,0.0000025108423,0.025108997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931467,0.00012086747,0.000036064324,0.000039496164,0.0000033054976,0.000003575261,0.00002465345,0.0000018809889,0.00045537067],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984201,0.00066091446,0.00007244987,0.00013904704,0.000111260015,0.0005961835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983954,0.0007270413,0.0003164535,0.00015900478,0.00022149921,0.0001805622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028259875,0.00013611937,0.00029417724,0.0015476841,0.0037305558,0.0049183224,0.00063579116,0.00076735276,0.0024944986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048884107,0.00013055002,0.00017996639,0.00282415,0.009848024,0.0031354527,0.003955131,0.0013184425,0.000092266324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003326958,0.000172108,0.10783809,0.0001844693,0.00005214795,0.001489578,0.49814343,0.0016956154,0.00064224884,0.34368542,0.0024917754,0.043272514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028365055,0.000084176674,0.41705987,0.00032676573,0.000019092931,0.00030414478,0.5069337,0.00095046294,0.0007100468,0.019562382,0.053980526,0.00004047729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040500537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068767056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040500537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062950305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019250034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08052957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734257280","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx043","title":"Introducing a Societal Culture Index to Compare Minority Nations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Political science; Index (typography); Politics; Sovereignty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Normative; Democracy; Minority rights; Empirical research; Political culture; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Economic growth; Development economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.033229853718498334,"score_gpt":0.3410213217413101,"score_spread":0.30779146802281176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734257280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404444,0.00017440281,0.0054138396,0.00025906146,0.000052838826,0.00012806285,0.000793962,0.000027175012,0.052706294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994142,0.00007057297,0.0037631236,0.000032439133,0.000012113933,0.00013414548,0.000652514,0.0000070263613,0.0011861725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.00032697406,0.000091900656,0.00006276651,0.00029083868,0.00013830648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977024,0.00041727466,0.0005988669,0.00016242021,0.00083282794,0.000286264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011833891,0.00023139235,0.00023254887,0.0039019145,0.0009298672,0.0016397833,0.00025441192,0.00023733731,0.0040426482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004301524,0.000047271096,0.00026556986,0.003126902,0.0007161392,0.0011296786,0.0019183891,0.000370557,0.00032711713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001769221,0.00021500526,0.849549,0.0001482086,0.00022601202,0.00013308704,0.009348862,0.0010313836,0.0035117462,0.029804619,0.003304043,0.102551214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019705627,0.00027430782,0.9419303,0.00010683874,0.00006224715,0.00011310116,0.02345339,0.0031574985,0.0019836954,0.006428753,0.022426533,0.000043752505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009240143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019297628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009240143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013794078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008262403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018372715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744934096","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx046","title":"Dynamic De/Centralization in Canada, 1867–2010","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Modernization theory; Political science; Nationalism; Citizenship; Localism; Globalization; Federalism; Political economy; Public administration; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01714878104020529,"score_gpt":0.2854445466285561,"score_spread":0.26829576558835083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744934096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4562502,0.019222185,0.0025409018,0.05508639,0.0011766183,0.00027195644,0.015900748,0.00040614262,0.4491449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960176,0.004146621,0.0012416899,0.0036872618,0.00011862946,0.000049682563,0.0025551294,0.00009913347,0.0920842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956637,0.00013382919,0.000096394106,0.00036752087,0.0014517141,0.00228681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944402,0.00023642703,0.00035977972,0.00019124364,0.003457629,0.0013146959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002013793,0.00039805842,0.00044337712,0.003389906,0.01547465,0.005196527,0.0014206142,0.0012692153,0.007001073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055491696,0.0004769392,0.0005409394,0.0065802857,0.0040907846,0.0014556111,0.0023703205,0.0031692025,0.00042893467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037641198,0.00014033713,0.08931986,0.0005184268,0.00019468465,0.0013474446,0.035963543,0.0037185072,0.0017712206,0.4347683,0.26709053,0.16479078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020480793,0.0000213086,0.19647922,0.00018802489,0.000036905494,0.0001803793,0.0064263307,0.0007083686,0.0006542073,0.0027455473,0.7924525,0.00008668893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6854805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31451952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30980775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79506016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766985713","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjx059","title":"Territorial Politics and Institutional Change: A Comparative-Historical Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Formative assessment; Relevance (law); Political science; Institutional change; Distribution (mathematics); Regional science; Sociology; Economic geography; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.11113074288731706,"score_gpt":0.3639255908357007,"score_spread":0.25279484794838364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766985713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4776475,0.06394476,0.029824253,0.012379411,0.000618089,0.00016562759,0.0010969375,0.000059670292,0.41426378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780477,0.013627234,0.0038160307,0.00025482877,0.0003385973,0.00007487103,0.00038678013,0.00001959641,0.0034343651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998611,0.0009218094,0.000043700693,0.00011054573,0.00014936639,0.00016358522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997303,0.0019776,0.00022349742,0.00016053487,0.00022019615,0.00011516374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026166218,0.00016185139,0.00024055295,0.0061393604,0.0024942032,0.0036281524,0.0005687827,0.00090067874,0.0052291215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037432697,0.00013817975,0.00031022166,0.009104066,0.00506361,0.004771335,0.0016645645,0.000974553,0.00020061951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846952,0.00004881878,0.01766876,0.00031052585,0.000041216234,0.0004855431,0.019838242,0.0012431024,0.00026376237,0.9157418,0.0041605234,0.04015924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115028915,0.00018486126,0.14958033,0.001044372,0.00008649486,0.0017999497,0.06423325,0.0035646243,0.00084025116,0.13129336,0.64731276,0.00004819281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006290904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010773717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006290904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042211083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070270494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030626476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889853603","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy027","title":"Climate and Clean Energy Policy: State Institutions and Economic Implications, by Benjamin H. DeitchmanPolitical Opportunities for Climate Policy: California, New York, and the Federal Government, by Roger Karapin","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Federalism; Energy policy; Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Climate change; Political science; Public administration; Business; Economics; Economic policy; Engineering; Renewable energy; Politics","score_opus":0.04349861915082217,"score_gpt":0.29604484021497396,"score_spread":0.2525462210641518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889853603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015638056,0.24644162,0.0005871742,0.6532072,0.006861872,0.000010838953,0.00016145737,0.00003011682,0.091135904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1560398,0.5284143,0.0019858193,0.049183145,0.012796884,0.00008260111,0.00030942657,0.00010389332,0.25108415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.00020002967,0.000017771988,0.00008588634,0.0002569071,0.0001140858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986008,0.0006805219,0.00013197037,0.0000617728,0.0002907736,0.00023409927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015491932,0.000553199,0.00033538227,0.0008559426,0.0046988693,0.0062921317,0.0006347017,0.0025594034,0.010221165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003126297,0.00040079883,0.0002835985,0.0022164476,0.005682945,0.0047921073,0.0017638534,0.0054609473,0.0009998673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658583,0.000025726147,0.0007928256,0.00009810024,0.000008053787,0.000029833747,0.00086463377,0.00059621566,0.000048960737,0.27176118,0.69662285,0.029135153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008656797,0.0000050768963,0.002649777,0.00052054913,0.0000078091225,0.000017868033,0.0009830423,0.0004102194,0.00005063534,0.07701658,0.918315,0.000014784739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.238508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38783982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.238508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012467988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014621186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4742394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891627666","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy026","title":"The Judicial Role in a Diverse Federation: Lessons from the Supreme Court of Canada, by Robert Schertzer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Scholarship; Power (physics); Negotiation; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01939889538228969,"score_gpt":0.27695199841936124,"score_spread":0.2575531030370716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891627666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025310896,0.11338579,0.0013971444,0.43839744,0.0023582166,0.000046156114,0.00020434661,0.00005489628,0.4188451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7225641,0.07069749,0.002108846,0.07371614,0.0012806415,0.00006113442,0.00019419534,0.0001032704,0.12927422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966067,0.00071005296,0.000052128362,0.00026890755,0.0012847079,0.0010773918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970902,0.0010303488,0.00008435298,0.00008387752,0.0010978347,0.00061337266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029227217,0.0004756067,0.0005091058,0.0016523406,0.03801983,0.014119301,0.0023649042,0.006314972,0.0026970098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006067498,0.00044044293,0.0003998105,0.0036010698,0.023179071,0.00519753,0.002787546,0.0075199213,0.0004204812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018477147,0.000019877227,0.00086050224,0.00006853135,0.000010943214,0.00036395356,0.018769987,0.0006774505,0.00008875673,0.7411492,0.22000252,0.017969867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023810459,0.000010413205,0.004666205,0.0006140886,0.00002133985,0.00016496319,0.023937345,0.0007633576,0.000119403536,0.119190425,0.8504197,0.00006894148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98812765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13983987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13983987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1802859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894311746","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy034","title":"The Canadian Reference Power: Delegation to the Courts and the Navigation of Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Delegate; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law and economics; New Federalism; Blame; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02384343397391637,"score_gpt":0.2908756696374878,"score_spread":0.2670322356635714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894311746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67589766,0.00308158,0.003813155,0.018427102,0.00013980463,0.00012596192,0.007987607,0.000075626434,0.2904515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195004,0.00049960735,0.0006518684,0.0004169297,0.000020417167,0.000015416656,0.000769906,0.000022609487,0.0056532966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250185,0.0012339044,0.0002188366,0.00077648566,0.0034333454,0.0018354254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97085637,0.009728466,0.004757055,0.0016101614,0.011439258,0.0016086727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005025194,0.00014815656,0.00042005617,0.0050049573,0.007553948,0.0067655877,0.0015482936,0.00090770837,0.009283254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043476533,0.00017877856,0.00024047728,0.012587573,0.00624837,0.0020454535,0.0023926857,0.0016076595,0.00037721894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016819313,0.000051957868,0.35109192,0.00026495365,0.00008388402,0.00071591,0.065819606,0.0024389606,0.00054108875,0.39862418,0.083498076,0.09670131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025494215,0.00002283766,0.5863254,0.00057134294,0.00010303714,0.0001512155,0.06555949,0.0034935672,0.0007474,0.02869953,0.31415904,0.0001417027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059571113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059571113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06366022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43222076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900216905","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy040","title":"<i>The Parliaments of Autonomous Nations</i>, Edited by Guy Laforest and André Lecours","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Autonomy; Theme (computing); State (computer science); Gender studies; Economic history; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012903225716230008,"score_gpt":0.2810982031273108,"score_spread":0.26819497741108084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900216905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003822996,0.36083248,0.0017091221,0.078176424,0.11224291,0.00007014848,0.0022731577,0.00032115154,0.44055164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06776628,0.1266941,0.0026109428,0.021117369,0.04415218,0.0002110853,0.0025505018,0.00090447336,0.7339932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988507,0.0004153325,0.000046940226,0.00016488909,0.00041290995,0.000109251436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989274,0.0005393621,0.00011122932,0.000085278814,0.00020479911,0.00013192518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090796524,0.0012177519,0.00049108226,0.0023507546,0.0035326437,0.00626635,0.00090117456,0.0016994624,0.014177018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028052789,0.00042866752,0.0003726748,0.0025504844,0.0027952152,0.0032682118,0.002111618,0.003215425,0.004437469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014988318,0.000008662322,0.00011373086,0.00015685296,0.0000038410126,0.00006387296,0.0021317948,0.00012350573,0.00014059524,0.037525754,0.94095236,0.018764077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012113464,0.0000026358355,0.0005921263,0.00018912114,7.8110367e-7,0.00005993804,0.00040296238,0.000017888724,0.000026787702,0.0014922214,0.9972109,0.0000034527534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03248447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06567585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03248447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051134652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004166088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06459081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900510850","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy036","title":"Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Theorizing Dynamic De/Centralization in Federations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Political science; Public administration; Regional science; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.02556067526305265,"score_gpt":0.3120419825160873,"score_spread":0.2864813072530346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900510850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64857006,0.0015873367,0.24324252,0.0075152395,0.00010112608,0.0003727599,0.00017627975,0.00016981507,0.09826481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99228513,0.00013860062,0.0070179487,0.00005272715,0.000015534935,0.00008506692,0.000029252718,0.000005778226,0.0003699555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930235,0.0036970843,0.00038449166,0.0008765996,0.00081777445,0.0012005974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98389524,0.006613681,0.0049076737,0.0021478792,0.001583805,0.0008517854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014754855,0.00029923668,0.00043331558,0.0041077617,0.0033451286,0.0046416232,0.0012875882,0.0012701403,0.0019941432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024193633,0.00040198653,0.0004940621,0.0043469714,0.013666429,0.010858799,0.0052758106,0.0017316475,0.00013245498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024485133,0.000049774386,0.023168571,0.00008207998,0.000017679848,0.00009239976,0.012921526,0.0050078044,0.00035443748,0.941112,0.00046735615,0.01670183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002367555,0.00010737789,0.052141782,0.00031826246,0.00003925924,0.00026610773,0.035836402,0.01857435,0.0009103706,0.8682238,0.02349892,0.000059703158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005503535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034082509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014754855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006892174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060922843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07803208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908631081","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjy045","title":"The Limits of Federation-wide Political Parties in Ensuring Federal Stability: Nigeria under the Peoples Democratic Party","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Democracy; Political science; Scholarship; Public administration; Politics; Political stability; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03983703681417212,"score_gpt":0.2995773755339186,"score_spread":0.2597403387197465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908631081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009124,0.0015313341,0.002009827,0.014844503,0.00017417455,0.00005809166,0.00001862538,0.00000837586,0.18044263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879044,0.00010730938,0.00011706031,0.0002572017,0.000013800937,0.0000085697675,0.0000012110411,9.1253287e-7,0.00070353266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198806,0.004065659,0.00030002356,0.00037935952,0.0005653689,0.0027015929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929053,0.0033414224,0.0013524923,0.00045421414,0.0007470739,0.0011994067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012948227,0.00012538617,0.00027551805,0.00075814314,0.009123508,0.0088731535,0.0005318829,0.002421052,0.0035137332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012244608,0.00023502577,0.00021250588,0.0006272374,0.00820757,0.0041782977,0.005937232,0.003198835,0.0001638817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020504094,0.000114312556,0.034241788,0.00013054293,0.000021386753,0.0012255593,0.028491685,0.00058808946,0.0006896309,0.9013002,0.0016891375,0.031302605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017836985,0.0006460402,0.14972043,0.002696849,0.00018318293,0.0014863468,0.22899729,0.003937167,0.003712546,0.40548238,0.20280935,0.00015011842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007721397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019562708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012948227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045746462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074245376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06847763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943154033","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz010","title":"Reconceptualizing Canadian Federal Political Culture: Examining Differences between Quebec and the Rest of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Federalism; Political culture; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Promotion (chess); Civic culture; Rest (music); Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.029916103461324218,"score_gpt":0.25662456145858326,"score_spread":0.22670845799725903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943154033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808499,0.0009903143,0.00044928485,0.002169258,0.00004191565,0.000053076823,0.0016192442,0.000010080556,0.013816991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980379,0.00022998637,0.00023845815,0.00019574835,0.000003924819,0.000022398579,0.0004123177,0.0000050329827,0.00085428945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997349,0.00047019322,0.000098776574,0.00027130797,0.0008473367,0.0009633584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986698,0.0014279976,0.0013351663,0.00034697165,0.008623479,0.0015685221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036299217,0.00031929856,0.00050744356,0.0047231214,0.00929184,0.0038693487,0.0015135003,0.0005239482,0.0034215837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01009446,0.00018525207,0.00041702983,0.009880112,0.0028464454,0.0011428528,0.0018910716,0.00093716464,0.00012941111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015819412,0.00007338672,0.91881657,0.00012058669,0.00016006344,0.00013664212,0.038490638,0.0006477678,0.0005035673,0.007861385,0.0070813857,0.025949687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093253775,0.000024985322,0.9272451,0.00018826367,0.000058556332,0.000028327202,0.06206049,0.0007807675,0.00024535746,0.000357153,0.008955958,0.00004576134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99848515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10850524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10850524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09244781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78726435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979185294","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz027","title":"Assisted Reproduction Policy in Canada: Framing, Federalism, and Failure, by Dave Snow","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Parliament; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Federalism; Human reproduction; Narrative; Political science; Government (linguistics); Assisted reproductive technology; Public administration; Public policy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Geography; Medicine; Politics; Ecology; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01273400203705291,"score_gpt":0.2587116715931764,"score_spread":0.24597766955612346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979185294","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022078697,0.048951995,0.00081096473,0.85007316,0.0029788266,0.00004459468,0.00024459758,0.00005266884,0.07476451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6717394,0.07103378,0.0027896825,0.18663102,0.0017064695,0.00015183058,0.0002847883,0.00020585686,0.06545719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988483,0.0023096963,0.00022266968,0.0009985832,0.0043526506,0.0036332917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403627,0.0055558765,0.00065720663,0.00033989432,0.0061701653,0.0032406212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00956434,0.0006895843,0.00066703884,0.003204656,0.06874921,0.019089505,0.0037228419,0.0080709765,0.0041081537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019332021,0.0008074293,0.0005723624,0.0069847,0.041377418,0.005681013,0.0053235227,0.011563969,0.0004129018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037929352,0.000050445902,0.004061063,0.00019948679,0.000031021726,0.0007631337,0.09273053,0.0007785058,0.00016962417,0.35965443,0.5065234,0.035000466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021097472,0.000014901015,0.008532035,0.0008540892,0.000030688243,0.00019116074,0.08240396,0.00062195334,0.0002495806,0.034170657,0.8727257,0.00018411891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99666107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3123809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3123809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45556855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79754066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989574122","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjz029","title":"Understanding Majority Attitudes toward Minority Nations in Multinational Federations: The Case of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Status quo; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Perception; Identity (music); Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07476381841171725,"score_gpt":0.3123518136836071,"score_spread":0.23758799527188984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989574122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97727364,0.00020080172,0.00016288659,0.003072778,0.000012030285,0.00001670152,0.000050860577,0.0000027171245,0.01920762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860483,0.000108534456,0.00006860312,0.00017640134,0.000002145669,0.000003161964,0.0000169797,0.0000014551424,0.0010178979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732226,0.00051598845,0.00003659724,0.00019126525,0.00046750723,0.001466453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487925,0.0011411263,0.0008027789,0.00018747416,0.0014464855,0.0015429457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003551517,0.00021901543,0.00032466513,0.0016472444,0.02167757,0.0047573918,0.001145384,0.0009468492,0.0036192394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063644145,0.00015401655,0.0003423646,0.0023300073,0.006232907,0.0016302251,0.0029596852,0.0020019743,0.00010997888],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012522275,0.0001878137,0.57246697,0.000079811536,0.00005285231,0.0018081273,0.32858363,0.0007175733,0.00077590614,0.05959419,0.0051460494,0.030461926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013359617,0.000026514577,0.36450088,0.00021468854,0.00005215857,0.00017740586,0.60572445,0.0014814398,0.00034495248,0.0037992517,0.023608124,0.000056774716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99563366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07453429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058660794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5407866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042659518","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaa020","title":"Attitudes toward Ethnocultural Diversity in Multilevel Political Communities: Comparing the Effect of National and Subnational Attachments in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Multinational corporation; Geography; Political science; Economic geography; Demographic economics; Psychology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.15293704136058217,"score_gpt":0.37032371255146784,"score_spread":0.21738667119088567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042659518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980122,0.00006119114,0.000026382062,0.00014778637,0.0000057061743,0.000008875693,0.00008532729,0.0000014198833,0.0016510687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992774,0.000054875272,0.00003141257,0.000025491203,0.0000014236181,0.0000041470466,0.00006544333,0.0000012440439,0.0005385366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981665,0.00028705865,0.00004775763,0.00018953993,0.0004875503,0.00082176295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939844,0.00060652656,0.0009638294,0.00018771272,0.0014553375,0.002802274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015311453,0.0003021101,0.00046665565,0.0016755875,0.007546916,0.002062345,0.0009138811,0.00048408713,0.0030080616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00549508,0.00020740577,0.0005548333,0.0025594535,0.0022878174,0.00045163877,0.002394086,0.0011723131,0.00015774912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002003184,0.00013214846,0.9737645,0.0000187661,0.00005562477,0.0000898231,0.015253205,0.00015122989,0.0002794311,0.00056757766,0.00069293316,0.008794405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000516332,0.000031233267,0.9792317,0.000025607442,0.0000133212625,0.000017579841,0.019639263,0.00018915762,0.000058268175,0.00007453673,0.0007025686,0.000011506196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98848677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02742937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02742937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026886081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19901496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117418069","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaa035","title":"Undermining Governors: Argentina’s Double-Punishment Federal Spending Strategy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Dominance (genetics); Welfare; Opposition (politics); Political science; Economics; Punishment (psychology); Public economics; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09494603001844441,"score_gpt":0.3426340219890109,"score_spread":0.24768799197056646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117418069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7414198,0.0014230872,0.007816664,0.034118693,0.0005080057,0.00014194661,0.0002988836,0.00016526869,0.21410777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99050784,0.00022260721,0.00075197243,0.0009981788,0.0000929858,0.00004823023,0.000058535,0.000020878442,0.007298818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959006,0.0017932063,0.000090780384,0.00039248666,0.0005344978,0.001288408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957172,0.00095937104,0.000977173,0.000496653,0.0009516038,0.00089802925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041642804,0.00028198835,0.00038286176,0.00086152065,0.0033288733,0.003577728,0.00055949995,0.0010142027,0.0036670677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009405891,0.00016432893,0.00021475562,0.0010007032,0.00289363,0.0010667945,0.0024063394,0.0019072853,0.00028185718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050244137,0.00026539646,0.19942807,0.00030443442,0.00013447317,0.0012566133,0.018536389,0.004170706,0.0033000978,0.5881802,0.04929226,0.13462895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026719354,0.0005549557,0.37889665,0.0007259374,0.00015274357,0.00054906437,0.014785297,0.009959325,0.0026710003,0.071855284,0.5194441,0.00013847295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06299525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09320494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06299525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071127797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006013566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12525713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165420987","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab005","title":"Projecting the Nation(s) in Multinational Federal Systems: International Education and Nation Branding in Canada/Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Autonomy; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Nation branding; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03063296776982866,"score_gpt":0.29828131473622316,"score_spread":0.2676483469663945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165420987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93619555,0.0003073029,0.0005501459,0.0065858955,0.000025137186,0.0000195944,0.00011645807,0.000010772731,0.05618923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659085,0.00006609558,0.00012570027,0.000108555076,0.000001499086,0.0000025919821,0.000015893178,0.000002611923,0.0030861709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.00037885873,0.000020694562,0.000100314166,0.00026999257,0.00068118196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966653,0.00069430267,0.0003524734,0.00012438309,0.0010356647,0.0011277503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002355584,0.00011516946,0.0002065028,0.0010288816,0.012529785,0.00591821,0.00078554655,0.0005568285,0.0053487075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037036617,0.00009547034,0.00016650617,0.0019443552,0.005524783,0.0011347715,0.0022464884,0.0017275295,0.00010458077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017575912,0.00031532845,0.42584231,0.000110149165,0.0000646495,0.00060105865,0.17496793,0.0031807206,0.0012511455,0.27193195,0.01908431,0.10247476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020027093,0.000079117184,0.50650996,0.0002539166,0.000044712466,0.00012362462,0.36540803,0.004458014,0.0011247867,0.009761446,0.11212789,0.00008852639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99208105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100912794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100912794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07139436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.732177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166377604","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab011","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Coordination during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Responses in Australia, Canada, Germany, and Switzerland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public administration; Pandemic; Procurement; Member states; Business; Economics; Economic policy; Law; European union; Management","score_opus":0.04789608263493415,"score_gpt":0.32612999570565077,"score_spread":0.2782339130707166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166377604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178052,0.00027780674,0.0013101734,0.012699922,0.00004236113,0.00015846442,0.00027252833,0.000032535892,0.06740109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868625,0.00005406556,0.0001411226,0.00014134377,0.0000036470822,0.000014434328,0.000035548343,0.0000029814946,0.000920526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968093,0.0010863935,0.000057910383,0.00018447354,0.00036929525,0.0014925759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946379,0.0018088548,0.0009370308,0.00020123778,0.0014024245,0.0010125363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004747141,0.00020335385,0.00021540241,0.0016224317,0.005580259,0.0029545957,0.00079630903,0.0010550579,0.004223219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009991378,0.0001623915,0.000289823,0.0022000389,0.0039433087,0.001066058,0.002732905,0.0013005332,0.00013125803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034024197,0.00022535799,0.40399906,0.00019245713,0.00013879004,0.0023896336,0.16842341,0.038002666,0.0014299655,0.3183288,0.033757467,0.032772142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106714826,0.0000586246,0.5447369,0.00033866908,0.00006393715,0.0000958155,0.31830725,0.034395643,0.00061303645,0.025717158,0.0754526,0.0001135525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94704026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9507845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059879772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059879772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02882068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43446016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166600131","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab010","title":"Explaining Intergovernmental Conflict in the COVID-19 Crisis: The United States, Canada, and Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Political science; Presidential system; Democracy; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Divergence (linguistics); Skepticism; Incentive; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06304866190792953,"score_gpt":0.3308383654452491,"score_spread":0.26778970353731957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166600131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035424,0.00085649005,0.0006360006,0.010417888,0.000032440435,0.00006126069,0.00034832713,0.000015447646,0.084089726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986754,0.00015231871,0.00009422105,0.00016122467,0.0000040859513,0.0000074042987,0.00004664907,0.000003136879,0.00085561373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987263,0.00025788567,0.000028772693,0.00006552929,0.0002993081,0.0006221541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679935,0.00075752573,0.00042666087,0.00008852535,0.0011518602,0.0007759116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015633345,0.00019325444,0.00038399582,0.0022894288,0.0057032164,0.0036459852,0.00084767194,0.00094064046,0.005380542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007277418,0.00016348029,0.00025292547,0.0037997405,0.0036778885,0.0012308365,0.0024425827,0.0015094228,0.00013226527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015940296,0.00020355631,0.5526564,0.0001230187,0.00012205123,0.0011939049,0.03149444,0.024885094,0.00037771507,0.34242854,0.020614333,0.025741521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008033499,0.00003556198,0.69803715,0.00038310603,0.000111909016,0.00016912477,0.1118231,0.05444599,0.00034018228,0.08036001,0.054099116,0.00011434991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98297244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98618186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069108464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069108464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041451097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5014193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195366346","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab031","title":"Federal Constitutional Values and Citizen Attitudes to Government: Explaining Federal System Viability and Reform Preferences in Eight Countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Griffith University","keywords":"Federalist; Federalism; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Political system; Constitutional amendment; Political culture; Law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.022154561266615868,"score_gpt":0.2819885456755478,"score_spread":0.25983398440893196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195366346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795604,0.0000100635225,0.00006965266,0.0000538442,8.1909195e-7,0.0000027929966,0.00002191526,6.9212723e-7,0.0018841766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998828,0.000006498717,0.000029157298,0.0000062834433,6.1231225e-7,0.000001512686,0.00001977591,4.1329062e-7,0.000052948013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982235,0.0009640081,0.0000916146,0.000109794404,0.00023502283,0.00037604102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99115914,0.0041880035,0.002677108,0.00043838317,0.0009379546,0.0005993968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030108271,0.00010123385,0.00020701694,0.0015511845,0.0009528556,0.0020162275,0.00019187994,0.00038069172,0.0028887677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008628166,0.00010757726,0.00025014955,0.0018889173,0.0016435534,0.00077474734,0.0010120474,0.00058828626,0.00011673909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009329438,0.00010263537,0.98243517,0.000020716203,0.000045708122,0.00006385496,0.004119721,0.0010933338,0.00030530043,0.0047357115,0.00020871825,0.0067758285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012633919,0.00008272906,0.9740461,0.00002856557,0.00001920276,0.000036865695,0.021187685,0.001727568,0.00025912825,0.0013935602,0.0011925915,0.000013342323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016230159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025682665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016230159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017115559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006382734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032271385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196130899","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab020","title":"Dissecting Public Opinion on Regional Authority: Four Types of Regionalists Based on Citizens’ Preferences for Self-Rule and Shared Rule","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Universitetet i Bergen; Trond Mohn stiftelse","keywords":"Home rule; Rule of law; Autonomy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Political science; Regional autonomy; Majority rule; Identity (music); Public opinion; Public administration; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.09125133047699784,"score_gpt":0.32631382111843604,"score_spread":0.2350624906414382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196130899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99684525,0.00002022303,0.00023731796,0.00016628166,0.000003951116,0.000009666855,0.000030613977,0.0000016548577,0.0026849827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973077,0.000012361146,0.00008087807,0.000025870211,0.000004056577,0.0000067674155,0.000036185746,7.7882186e-7,0.000102313985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720275,0.001412893,0.00018338651,0.00020657216,0.0005607069,0.0004336625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98598564,0.0050514815,0.005201004,0.0008688385,0.0017917128,0.001101264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049862,0.00015412101,0.00025551874,0.0020345072,0.0010348018,0.0021255335,0.00040017976,0.00068543875,0.0021008383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012641199,0.00012418628,0.0004045499,0.0012003324,0.0021243242,0.0014339199,0.001764967,0.0009418152,0.00026777497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045323896,0.0001264252,0.9364282,0.000047714075,0.00008242862,0.00016644527,0.040935114,0.00027512075,0.0019170988,0.0030957346,0.0007080887,0.015764503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028072536,0.00014559056,0.8677219,0.00004742482,0.00003650137,0.00014375037,0.12427496,0.0018931088,0.0008716411,0.0025715434,0.0022211971,0.000044260683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046490203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006460627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000878848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000446007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212220698","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjab037","title":"Political Parties and Decentralization in Pakistan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Devolution (biology); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Constitution; Local government; Power (physics); Incentive; Newspaper; Centralized government; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02614863212868593,"score_gpt":0.3412473208945656,"score_spread":0.31509868876587965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212220698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491429,0.00017301904,0.00028167127,0.0011869806,0.000015218714,0.000014673233,0.000040644205,0.0000043393934,0.049140472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948823,0.000026076536,0.000015876425,0.00002401479,0.000003981796,0.0000012579585,0.0000051947663,3.7229574e-7,0.0004350647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937004,0.00015209113,0.000021969412,0.000057671536,0.000087567685,0.00031077611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.00040285746,0.00062939664,0.00006617748,0.00013421578,0.00028175407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083318393,0.000054382173,0.0001285605,0.00086697086,0.0026871625,0.0019100987,0.000151376,0.00034780474,0.0070110457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022933774,0.00010766522,0.00007682851,0.0012018667,0.0022776178,0.00073271425,0.0013067008,0.00075234845,0.00020769607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049296377,0.00031950005,0.606746,0.00014165897,0.000049031954,0.0011360734,0.04981555,0.0018426613,0.0014208984,0.2592224,0.0055611352,0.07325214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012723147,0.00010607104,0.85762835,0.00010507811,0.000020572792,0.0003293917,0.063378304,0.0017297268,0.00059807237,0.031001592,0.044947747,0.000027758771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01514617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02006493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01514617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020416656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014433346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030116022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739138","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac008","title":"Dual versus Administrative Federalism: Origins and Evolution of Two Models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Dual (grammatical number); Convergence (economics); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Dual purpose; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.07011801920331819,"score_gpt":0.342197706841622,"score_spread":0.2720796876383038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214739138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54333377,0.0021859263,0.08928522,0.027600208,0.00023574254,0.0001088972,0.000239939,0.00022419218,0.3367861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949197,0.00016938456,0.0027926515,0.000117307,0.000019708661,0.00001944473,0.000023029917,0.000014007343,0.0019248055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963349,0.0021358537,0.00008373178,0.00042776615,0.00043952593,0.00057820126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925378,0.0037965921,0.0010453212,0.0010504238,0.00081782753,0.0007519945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062884567,0.00022840823,0.00044978512,0.0021016942,0.002717693,0.0058171926,0.0012374028,0.0018416739,0.007200156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010079415,0.00024139613,0.00057223864,0.0017185885,0.0117454855,0.00524833,0.002381188,0.0016450579,0.00048468733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017738696,0.000016991557,0.0013534643,0.000009299876,0.0000046550213,0.000019602689,0.0015361308,0.0010144552,0.00002635841,0.9931912,0.00041558637,0.002394361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034612174,0.00003975503,0.0049259528,0.00010684152,0.000020032661,0.0001193449,0.00408453,0.01678364,0.00015459808,0.95604867,0.01764988,0.000032088727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009839802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008905831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011211274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011211274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030245965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08134389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244142346","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a030081","title":"Briefly Notable","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Citizenship; Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.018075681276927418,"score_gpt":0.28246591530738896,"score_spread":0.2643902340304615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244142346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011819648,0.039341193,0.0009325052,0.052431963,0.11990048,0.000110429304,0.0026583923,0.00073264824,0.7827103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076165716,0.016785825,0.0004124658,0.009010711,0.018478738,0.000029921925,0.001443889,0.0004285,0.94579345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845266,0.00010201648,0.000042102034,0.00017463227,0.0010061361,0.00022247329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734914,0.0003270986,0.00010418629,0.00015189577,0.0013384286,0.0007293394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010407126,0.0008488549,0.00060319866,0.0035111113,0.0045636585,0.00736744,0.0013724001,0.002328993,0.30793443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004580421,0.00029479098,0.0005366159,0.0047698747,0.0018208893,0.0038288063,0.0021874823,0.0017424893,0.09392131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016287042,0.000006687868,0.00007841839,0.00011950127,0.000001550543,0.00005134301,0.00017831873,0.00001352296,0.00010632828,0.0035124698,0.968423,0.027492506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010704513,0.0000027009307,0.00017606042,0.000044479362,0.0000010675631,0.000044719884,0.00010248958,0.000003831372,0.000025398376,0.00032165324,0.9992742,0.000002376556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11267934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2497455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6920656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064702756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009929745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250306456","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004967","title":"Book Reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Federalism; History; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05210293692049371,"score_gpt":0.30165951963573656,"score_spread":0.24955658271524284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250306456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035897578,0.23817898,0.0012160996,0.029772332,0.06967034,0.00019376024,0.0030572389,0.00084369857,0.6567086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021922642,0.103077665,0.0009828401,0.01646368,0.02329063,0.00013060748,0.0029422455,0.00044650226,0.8504736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804974,0.00019173948,0.00012646042,0.00023010118,0.0012872049,0.000114697235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455875,0.0010377404,0.00035776853,0.00035659096,0.0031494908,0.00053965696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008808408,0.00092334824,0.0012011868,0.0047524204,0.0010336422,0.0058228164,0.0017833385,0.0027766305,0.44666475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008592059,0.00045546738,0.0006996925,0.0061740167,0.00067355856,0.0035237283,0.0014908663,0.0024342695,0.4016573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068721365,0.00001005929,0.000019088358,0.00034555868,0.0000030280412,0.00002146217,0.000018610699,0.000025432086,0.00006203744,0.0011794562,0.9393032,0.0590053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002205352,0.000004630984,0.000043425374,0.0002818701,0.00000206592,0.00005736897,0.000016098356,0.0000067670017,0.000019784196,0.00045209844,0.9991111,0.0000025600323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002284723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040529286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44666475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018185836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026671917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7892656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282000494","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac014","title":"Regulating Family Law in Federations: The Impact of De/Centralization, Religion, and International Treaties on Abortion and Child Marriage Policies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Legislation; Federalism; Family law; Affect (linguistics); Law; Political science; Race (biology); Sociology; Law and economics; Gender studies; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.024983204347097346,"score_gpt":0.3304676656020918,"score_spread":0.30548446125499445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282000494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95005,0.00052944163,0.0005039076,0.0067971437,0.000036126185,0.000028315557,0.00003951441,0.00001049812,0.042005055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0000624672,0.00006145929,0.00025426954,0.00001335069,0.0000066653165,0.000008666061,0.0000013344128,0.00052465865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720795,0.0069864425,0.00026661702,0.0005959157,0.0013388166,0.0036042815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696333,0.011727684,0.011800986,0.0016859302,0.0020781297,0.0030739047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013782085,0.00009527663,0.00034801202,0.00095495186,0.0051487065,0.0044761207,0.00087717234,0.0010493646,0.0051209806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027032444,0.00016684787,0.00041524117,0.0012096029,0.006119593,0.0016720966,0.0039668004,0.001677986,0.00022094083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005896497,0.0012055214,0.53589064,0.00014946176,0.00021350167,0.000520787,0.027486872,0.004224579,0.0016599721,0.3521086,0.005895021,0.07005538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001306702,0.00052877946,0.8971759,0.00037364216,0.00018190633,0.00013452976,0.035441376,0.003539814,0.0014261199,0.02976235,0.031252295,0.000052679254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03536814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062199302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03536814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008269322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009135939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07288748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291237217","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjac033","title":"From the Ivory Tower to the Courtroom: Cooperative Federalism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Majority opinion; Term (time); Jurisdiction; Constitution; Separation of powers; Original jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Politics","score_opus":0.026826196433593217,"score_gpt":0.2686306425056153,"score_spread":0.2418044460720221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291237217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4746232,0.005524259,0.002771982,0.056013666,0.00031907947,0.00007012207,0.00060519116,0.000057613386,0.46001488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189067,0.00044233838,0.00024446982,0.0017054543,0.00003300097,0.000007562607,0.000040174073,0.000009687613,0.005626749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866934,0.0019564296,0.00020052891,0.0008071372,0.0043801633,0.003986452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853373,0.005115392,0.00088285765,0.00043418535,0.005876265,0.0023540535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052763936,0.00016600301,0.00040355773,0.003451755,0.030377662,0.014300353,0.001981436,0.0027929607,0.00451629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0187601,0.00028730158,0.00028432027,0.006375044,0.019992175,0.003197268,0.003337578,0.004753318,0.00018341189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035435794,0.000025934283,0.011653367,0.00004884803,0.000021035657,0.00048252277,0.034134597,0.0009293516,0.00031501756,0.91337115,0.025582017,0.013400728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066848734,0.000077683275,0.1327007,0.0011794667,0.00016160056,0.00033946164,0.1375331,0.0049108653,0.0017040162,0.14738134,0.5735736,0.00037128697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99076337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1988665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1988665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1819824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9292013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368347279","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad014","title":"<i>A Written Constitution for Quebec?</i> edited by Léonid Sirota and Richard Albert","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Queen (butterfly); Federalism; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Art history; History; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.020701594154192208,"score_gpt":0.2873191751224956,"score_spread":0.2666175809683034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368347279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025093085,0.21918617,0.0019110268,0.21389194,0.036955394,0.00018941532,0.007778885,0.0005716118,0.5170063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03366208,0.049712934,0.0016452664,0.020813761,0.0026506586,0.00013954574,0.0028216408,0.0005450195,0.888009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983541,0.00022277466,0.000043392225,0.00015469533,0.000924616,0.00030044635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974101,0.00026629015,0.00010176195,0.0001357584,0.0017189388,0.00036714732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016626852,0.00083654176,0.0006493513,0.002069432,0.005810961,0.007393507,0.0011298077,0.0026259443,0.07697334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004785163,0.00045961555,0.00043839857,0.004125841,0.003517562,0.002427772,0.001607247,0.0029170173,0.013387981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069188222,0.0000038253997,0.00013125745,0.000055714598,0.0000020481807,0.000021254458,0.0002320988,0.00005416761,0.00007706798,0.0066375365,0.9794449,0.01333315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021493424,0.0000015210917,0.0005855555,0.00013416397,0.000001320318,0.000012462352,0.00022927753,0.00002490578,0.00004221049,0.00048918516,0.9984675,0.00000965496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9520536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97130626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03914623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078155585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2840271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387473697","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjad036","title":"Measuring Policy Diffusion in Federal Systems: The Case of Legalizing Cannabis in Canada under Time Constraints","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Legislation; Qualitative research; Government (linguistics); Salient; Complement (music); Frame (networking); Political science; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.05046941324031452,"score_gpt":0.30237060033188073,"score_spread":0.2519011870915662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387473697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841092,0.0001743032,0.0013727862,0.0016699454,0.000008057961,0.0000834026,0.0009001372,0.000015481846,0.011666563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980627,0.000078339486,0.00079226284,0.0000421984,0.0000022119702,0.000021158734,0.00024213965,0.0000041421713,0.00075483124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950787,0.0013070777,0.00025300728,0.00041537316,0.0017985812,0.0011472999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658513,0.018320259,0.004948318,0.0010775434,0.008082759,0.0017198932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059271404,0.00021449532,0.0005151574,0.004908162,0.006383616,0.0036074368,0.0013234207,0.0009192235,0.0031328322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0332984,0.00018912049,0.0003259715,0.0121382065,0.003932263,0.0018616767,0.0018049893,0.001624114,0.00014115337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041637823,0.0004035665,0.7388891,0.0004956412,0.00020965344,0.0016381394,0.052037634,0.05360729,0.0016495979,0.06794961,0.006942779,0.07576069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042208398,0.00010343273,0.8008946,0.00029000707,0.000086461914,0.00017159345,0.09897827,0.068010524,0.0019038139,0.009469976,0.019887391,0.0001617424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97976893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08220693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08220693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048002385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391768338","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae003","title":"Federalism, Decentral Governance, and Joint Decision-Making: Bad News for the Implementation of International Environmental Agreements?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München","keywords":"Federalism; Multi-level governance; Veto; Corporate governance; Convention; Compliance (psychology); International relations; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.016732391311254223,"score_gpt":0.3215731915192477,"score_spread":0.3048408002079935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391768338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30278137,0.007020022,0.010671989,0.58221906,0.0011941864,0.000040183855,0.0001449561,0.00011368417,0.095814615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995097,0.0005870245,0.00041192272,0.002892745,0.00026467373,0.000013976184,0.000014335701,0.00001346997,0.00070484844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852356,0.008963979,0.00032437526,0.0010574777,0.0024137187,0.0020048216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331017,0.043963846,0.009066832,0.006007574,0.0045913737,0.0032686358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023576902,0.00017553421,0.00073144794,0.0008708755,0.0029043106,0.00724909,0.0013270709,0.0036613613,0.009556709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061518453,0.00020292697,0.000593958,0.0013524436,0.015652955,0.009204877,0.0038769003,0.007178686,0.00042633343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002795163,0.00025448407,0.020870803,0.00021144199,0.00010709801,0.000095098636,0.0021324288,0.0037874193,0.00016571648,0.90818405,0.014385003,0.049526926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010861894,0.00014388628,0.044078708,0.0005838982,0.00011164859,0.000084415544,0.008716897,0.005458311,0.0007377731,0.9049474,0.034952193,0.000076166485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006071545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056598894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023576902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049286387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048591765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12468803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915596","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae004","title":"<i>Rethinking Decentralization: Mapping the Meaning of Subsidiarity in Federal Political Culture</i>, by Jacob Deem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Decentralization; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political culture; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04500437366301309,"score_gpt":0.2957533105465377,"score_spread":0.2507489368835246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11846971,0.02619099,0.009445594,0.63025904,0.0028312388,0.000024797631,0.0004608402,0.00010827298,0.21220952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570157,0.008109616,0.0026324329,0.016432814,0.0011513131,0.000041597687,0.00016299344,0.00018512606,0.014268352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812466,0.0012128184,0.000040570278,0.00021090312,0.00022847166,0.000182605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953629,0.0033772418,0.000426211,0.00025878183,0.00036387853,0.00021089641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149609,0.00030650158,0.00028842076,0.0013338551,0.0058322446,0.010136117,0.0008556141,0.0015459197,0.0037906454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00892019,0.00023648213,0.00031923098,0.0048393914,0.018958488,0.0096429605,0.0029003723,0.004766261,0.00038954278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030950272,0.000022984543,0.005248413,0.00011154786,0.000018153336,0.000049760423,0.05707696,0.00030571912,0.00025305376,0.8219427,0.07816252,0.036777236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009624371,0.000014641081,0.025997123,0.0006668986,0.000021315593,0.00011086065,0.100854345,0.0009300813,0.00066974445,0.5285194,0.34216475,0.00004119466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039370492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08327095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039370492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005856215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005829536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078282654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396625434","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae012","title":"<i>Managing Federalism through Pandemic</i>, by Kathy L. Brock and Geoffrey Hale","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Federalism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law and economics; Economic history; Economics; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02347726187068172,"score_gpt":0.2848828852118721,"score_spread":0.2614056233411904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396625434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008220751,0.33212745,0.0006340853,0.48722494,0.047715325,0.000039562434,0.00033940916,0.0002316239,0.13086554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029085215,0.3391695,0.0012917775,0.08443862,0.041764576,0.00009979574,0.0004456581,0.00042845853,0.5032764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873596,0.00029987103,0.00006817206,0.00012296357,0.00060473353,0.00016828877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972983,0.0008862344,0.00027213764,0.00011391913,0.0006154984,0.0008139629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021481856,0.00075989973,0.0004623384,0.0013935242,0.0032419208,0.0063920356,0.0007637311,0.00328502,0.061350156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071182195,0.0005046718,0.0004355002,0.0022177906,0.003465101,0.009570205,0.0033914994,0.003803074,0.020668799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000433689,0.000002759528,0.00006580823,0.00006922454,0.0000010888191,0.0000088652205,0.00038510907,0.000011019926,0.000029879058,0.0024629089,0.98228735,0.014671701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017816725,0.0000050358663,0.0003728813,0.0003209694,0.0000019387128,0.000043287753,0.00075819466,0.000011775715,0.00003364075,0.0014177342,0.9970271,0.0000057941684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031352866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06307305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061350156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004924291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088180285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20523673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399264968","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae015","title":"<i>Indigenous Peoples and the Future of Federalism</i>, edited by Amy Swiften and Joshua Nichols","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Federalism; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007172353246309677,"score_gpt":0.2614054989816331,"score_spread":0.25423314573532346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399264968","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001894624,0.6294538,0.00031382916,0.21526438,0.010544442,0.000013130424,0.00022774126,0.000055406344,0.14223263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09995045,0.52437246,0.0011039672,0.026368072,0.012220109,0.00004982639,0.00035136825,0.00012608006,0.33545768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992101,0.00025488163,0.000027963453,0.00007522821,0.0002874163,0.00014431114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940014,0.00023921487,0.00007244571,0.00003004239,0.00012697109,0.00013117872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012136752,0.0004800956,0.00033875444,0.0014606328,0.0036446499,0.005688234,0.00063327537,0.00182493,0.016798275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021636619,0.00034454674,0.0003652951,0.0027235888,0.0050114277,0.004918343,0.0019167536,0.0028818152,0.0027809239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013592626,0.000009390068,0.00037956442,0.00030210085,0.000006657704,0.00006056653,0.0047412016,0.00005575453,0.00007573395,0.07420332,0.88711524,0.033036802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031464142,0.0000039395877,0.0017192893,0.0006374574,0.0000055473383,0.000059741797,0.0039438694,0.000026420867,0.000041848096,0.015519863,0.9780297,0.000009178764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12579647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2593448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12579647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077659944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01265185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2501285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399280637","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae017","title":"The Frontiers of Nullification and Anticommandeering: Federalism and Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; Federalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional interpretation; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.017363851217235687,"score_gpt":0.2830628415839839,"score_spread":0.26569899036674827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399280637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10889107,0.015122904,0.09333976,0.16610007,0.0007088664,0.000066806104,0.00013880379,0.000113347465,0.6155184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898727,0.00075616885,0.0041985493,0.0018532414,0.00015678145,0.000025887706,0.000014415166,0.00002206746,0.0031002061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846741,0.010038436,0.00035523184,0.0010295461,0.0024807164,0.0014219224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765079,0.01685374,0.00094282685,0.0023520992,0.0024199358,0.0009235299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021033987,0.00029886916,0.00089491653,0.0025548367,0.009722731,0.015368379,0.002222431,0.005637499,0.003716807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018757258,0.00039350748,0.0006623053,0.0023123294,0.1158267,0.008806587,0.0050016697,0.011529318,0.00020263501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018259328,0.0000013124011,0.00003623436,0.0000025874585,6.8264495e-7,0.000008905784,0.0005722231,0.000059672042,0.000013852462,0.99861,0.00014997601,0.00054272375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007667093,0.000004424249,0.0003047823,0.00006662154,0.0000048247366,0.000017079243,0.0010671949,0.00059726054,0.00007875574,0.9857678,0.0120725,0.000011144443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16902897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13962764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16902897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03253974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023931362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3360902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401206851","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae027","title":"<i>Multiple Barriers: The Multilevel Governance of Homelessness in Canada</i>, by Alison Smith","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Criminology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0233035077151718,"score_gpt":0.3217525083372681,"score_spread":0.2984490006220963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401206851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003616453,0.22913513,0.0004310429,0.6988822,0.0100878095,0.000060323175,0.0007475366,0.000068697555,0.056970716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1896372,0.52709967,0.0018880608,0.101001695,0.011519688,0.00015596725,0.0011396818,0.0003231156,0.16723488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809414,0.00024671442,0.000046176996,0.0001468294,0.00092079514,0.0005453781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968485,0.0004751275,0.00018008276,0.00007545301,0.0011446915,0.00127611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020002648,0.0008640692,0.00067066395,0.0021765034,0.012200601,0.010533727,0.0014329378,0.003063057,0.011310832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004901134,0.00055150635,0.00058375427,0.0053670187,0.011549844,0.0042148153,0.0038112449,0.0067170244,0.0015111134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010922684,0.000008573631,0.0019065022,0.00020432226,0.000012995437,0.000048409223,0.0054200715,0.00013945201,0.00004894558,0.011833795,0.95821863,0.022147454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083873,0.000010337977,0.015116576,0.0018877683,0.00002573602,0.00011231344,0.021057876,0.00018107715,0.00007996149,0.008885124,0.95257866,0.00005614524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085871905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085871905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16153331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62304723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402553924","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae034","title":"Between Decentralization and Asymmetry: Explaining Preferences toward the Division of Power in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Decentralization; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Political mobilization; Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.02837015183771204,"score_gpt":0.2852332397300176,"score_spread":0.25686308789230555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402553924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99442565,0.000042524134,0.00013785416,0.00036437414,0.0000034146897,0.00001405875,0.00011781096,0.0000019256054,0.004892351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995227,0.000021392529,0.000047886682,0.000016440621,0.0000010829731,0.000002144843,0.00004286051,7.899976e-7,0.0003446896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843246,0.00029896904,0.00004044019,0.000118876305,0.00051382463,0.0005954332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316674,0.0018769385,0.0014352748,0.00030226313,0.00171337,0.0015054172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002146367,0.00014759718,0.00025838058,0.0011380136,0.003866782,0.00194196,0.0005519934,0.00040662597,0.0038482754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084349,0.000103232676,0.0002534916,0.0017230511,0.0027388665,0.0004232956,0.0011135908,0.0008669672,0.00012218565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019588695,0.00006283048,0.9663671,0.00002656721,0.000044022283,0.00014698914,0.013107067,0.0010192059,0.0005089854,0.0048490535,0.0013286717,0.012343454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016734633,0.00002408785,0.9665873,0.00003990961,0.00001395452,0.00003047215,0.026074281,0.002425662,0.00019149033,0.0014670008,0.0031062525,0.000022825589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028411806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026613517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019224824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1930955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403293784","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae008","title":"Subjective Perceptions of Difference in Multi-level States: Regional Values, Embeddedness, and Bias in Canadian Provinces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embeddedness; Perception; Political science; Demographic economics; Regional science; Psychology; Economic geography; Geography; Sociology; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.08414540416916524,"score_gpt":0.3383810817709529,"score_spread":0.25423567760178767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403293784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99623626,0.00007265266,0.0002445183,0.00019359839,0.000004045367,0.000011166229,0.00013097873,0.000002354961,0.003104425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997205,0.000025397996,0.00005297447,0.0000134912825,0.0000010340144,0.0000026192708,0.000046042886,9.3783194e-7,0.0001369374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675983,0.0006720166,0.00017442949,0.00029034662,0.0014283813,0.00067501626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741144,0.0032794897,0.0027709962,0.0006366879,0.004237526,0.0016639302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049875346,0.00018131053,0.00039604265,0.0026392192,0.0043129427,0.0028697092,0.0007810497,0.00039794727,0.001776493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015914164,0.00017981681,0.00031033315,0.003549666,0.004891894,0.0008663442,0.0019801077,0.00063847995,0.000059707676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015510744,0.000038296595,0.9243148,0.00005119678,0.000067098685,0.000075844335,0.060150433,0.0006068472,0.00048058177,0.003171513,0.00057557673,0.0103126345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007929688,0.000031352418,0.93575704,0.000057372337,0.000019716175,0.000023230448,0.060279656,0.0008086609,0.00018536822,0.00075792265,0.0020299954,0.000041636773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02804041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026692769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015677903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19367051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405397944","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae047","title":"<i>The Adaptable Country: How Canada Can Survive the Twenty-First Century</i>, Alasdair Roberts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.009458195246600562,"score_gpt":0.22019155709378732,"score_spread":0.21073336184718677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405397944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015494439,0.020983426,0.00081405585,0.53553,0.008211411,0.0000715778,0.00043869053,0.00014855401,0.41830787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17574607,0.0141121615,0.0013067103,0.08219526,0.00055584195,0.00004011114,0.00016803961,0.00020133471,0.72567445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852306,0.00013671038,0.000018239927,0.00009503995,0.00041725376,0.0008098104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985164,0.00010155947,0.000037637397,0.00002881019,0.0004230333,0.0008925423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013437235,0.00045778937,0.0002563386,0.0006357942,0.0271425,0.013355582,0.0011458237,0.004119633,0.02280988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002392902,0.00023602483,0.00032465276,0.0012392884,0.008686585,0.003721507,0.0037645,0.006668982,0.0015908616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026284995,0.000026517542,0.0017626385,0.0000732288,0.0000111904765,0.00034374173,0.009237847,0.0002330898,0.00020980313,0.15340337,0.79945505,0.035217237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038541916,0.0000052375076,0.0012951477,0.0000923896,0.0000055750047,0.000037067042,0.013845555,0.000060129205,0.00008215781,0.0050441017,0.97950613,0.000022649941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94553006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054469954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19015908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39520907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405906595","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjae049","title":"Federalism and Social Policy Expansion in Canada during the Justin Trudeau Era","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.009665602133736547,"score_gpt":0.2363320022158864,"score_spread":0.22666640008214986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405906595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7879042,0.0034711035,0.0010583794,0.058032874,0.00017231857,0.00007627304,0.0006977555,0.000045810742,0.14854132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895188,0.0005652482,0.00023743632,0.0011862363,0.000015976082,0.000010292168,0.00006279957,0.000009951101,0.008393365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548507,0.00039773242,0.000056545596,0.00028618294,0.0011157054,0.0026587779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558276,0.00073453115,0.0004487915,0.00013296437,0.0015170539,0.0015840223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566442,0.00016665357,0.00034653282,0.0021906465,0.022047423,0.0058145956,0.0011098329,0.0014231585,0.005141004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00630573,0.00024416088,0.00032988875,0.0035109012,0.010620556,0.0013849522,0.0037781333,0.0033554973,0.00012199276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016286192,0.00009720886,0.086510085,0.000110652814,0.000052366682,0.0007880352,0.09447338,0.002028527,0.00094056607,0.7336074,0.033260416,0.047968384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041473973,0.00005504809,0.40459624,0.00037364583,0.00006278392,0.00018397243,0.074974716,0.0022470828,0.0010219755,0.02221784,0.49404886,0.00017633617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71125174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28874826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27270305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8249512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407428885","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf003","title":"A Reply to Fenna and Schnabel’s (2024) “What is Federalism?”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017456448418647668,"score_gpt":0.3070459932782696,"score_spread":0.2895895448596219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407428885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014974737,0.0019292214,0.0003002771,0.99038374,0.005087038,0.0000025429852,0.000046288154,0.000012694741,0.0020883922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00815407,0.0012646558,0.00063959556,0.9749944,0.008090498,0.000031961194,0.000040157956,0.000052782514,0.0067318664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174213,0.0032319971,0.00040716364,0.0015001622,0.00207825,0.0010403362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841138,0.010830672,0.00073861267,0.00051287503,0.0026574882,0.001146571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009776317,0.0012499456,0.0013297974,0.0014378855,0.008547664,0.008417645,0.003577728,0.039885707,0.011749361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03367223,0.0008483726,0.0014885142,0.0019055587,0.015585498,0.021279035,0.005085513,0.04312341,0.004378685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016189295,0.0000075050575,0.0000973851,0.000048172675,0.0000047434396,0.00005296852,0.0019001428,0.000038901824,0.000049426926,0.100924015,0.8931253,0.0037351626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019194396,0.000010717864,0.00046514653,0.00037699874,0.000006833388,0.00018404868,0.0037098674,0.00014327714,0.00013670948,0.09583944,0.89904755,0.00006024543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02672307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03251074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039885707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009050794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009277804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06566846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409386891","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf009","title":"A Complex Intergovernmental Problem: Why Asylum Seekers Challenge Canada’s Immigration System","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Political science; Public administration; Criminology; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014858851085099038,"score_gpt":0.25432472077148427,"score_spread":0.23946586968638522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409386891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5763777,0.0015743137,0.0037409011,0.23841219,0.0003972087,0.00015781175,0.0001891815,0.00008760391,0.17906314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916739,0.00021190153,0.00044890793,0.0033192146,0.000022180682,0.000013891441,0.000018860263,0.000015059917,0.004275997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98735946,0.0026827806,0.00015520903,0.00075636274,0.0021859475,0.006860161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883464,0.0023499965,0.0007440757,0.0005580619,0.003464026,0.0045374455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009338934,0.00025861818,0.00046421372,0.0011637355,0.047369305,0.014791347,0.0028905496,0.005758147,0.0052727484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014605165,0.0003536796,0.00055758766,0.0026187706,0.02605449,0.0035139269,0.007995177,0.0069064046,0.00027294664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010677661,0.00009080743,0.04881362,0.00014616556,0.00006540077,0.0022767857,0.16479284,0.004304027,0.0012572346,0.69343257,0.062893845,0.021819774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000695457,0.00005629066,0.05952384,0.00048292655,0.00006976351,0.00040214797,0.4867103,0.0066245445,0.00077161065,0.09787556,0.3471625,0.0002510502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98582166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99180365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21066758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21066758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22893733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91551375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410158087","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf015","title":"Federalism, Intergovernmental Conflict, and the COVID-19 Crises in Latin America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Latin Americans; Political science; Federalism; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public administration; Development economics; Political economy; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Virology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03398233416034936,"score_gpt":0.35357710505611206,"score_spread":0.3195947708957627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410158087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90971774,0.005503553,0.00037953097,0.028061697,0.0000667643,0.00001618174,0.00014884853,0.000009388309,0.056096315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985959,0.0005531638,0.00003228895,0.0003712236,0.000026664222,0.000004643828,0.00002508491,0.0000011808183,0.00038992026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836785,0.00096087105,0.000049753155,0.00007002736,0.00010338029,0.00044810306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942707,0.0023145827,0.0022535785,0.0001528013,0.0004300612,0.0005783663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023898988,0.00010725871,0.00021712398,0.001320059,0.0022220502,0.002684516,0.0003114179,0.0007135348,0.003943447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053056027,0.000071722665,0.00014720701,0.0025541333,0.0038246382,0.0013734677,0.0023407927,0.00080200523,0.00007171151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026054255,0.00030924263,0.5662755,0.0003769548,0.00009389851,0.0015542477,0.046467736,0.0023730104,0.0008614086,0.3298948,0.010517007,0.04101569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004597792,0.00011521736,0.7281654,0.00062473014,0.000032291067,0.0003652313,0.15385813,0.0015436759,0.00036625256,0.04601532,0.06880605,0.000061687875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032107625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035663273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032107625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044217464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031663568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06384146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411761855","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf024","title":"Variation All the Way Down: Charting the Subnational Trajectories of School Choice Policy across and within Multicultural Democracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Multiculturalism; Political science; Index (typography); Scale (ratio); Decentralization; Development economics; Regional science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.03153268085362771,"score_gpt":0.34975927518016364,"score_spread":0.31822659432653594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411761855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892784,0.0001876792,0.0016920924,0.00035668348,0.0000076151773,0.000018488592,0.0006662927,0.000016615955,0.007776064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985745,0.000061394596,0.0006906129,0.000018446119,0.0000021268406,0.000010782895,0.00034630718,0.000006709122,0.00028903855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986614,0.00056710927,0.0001035514,0.00025266,0.00015949477,0.0002557175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506724,0.0015272821,0.0016121501,0.00061665656,0.0007734819,0.0004031067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021164527,0.00009895465,0.00030634148,0.0033185207,0.0008847146,0.0022688597,0.0003444185,0.00024912064,0.001859509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070278198,0.00011956414,0.00028834405,0.0053043095,0.0013005944,0.0017124563,0.0025535733,0.00061697804,0.00013960106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015934004,0.00005115501,0.90348035,0.000066691675,0.00012363108,0.000119209,0.021939792,0.0034224938,0.0010908205,0.024358954,0.0011739784,0.044013597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003311535,0.00004193683,0.9714603,0.00005044177,0.00002103492,0.000044674995,0.015460889,0.00280007,0.00043086064,0.0039106896,0.005752067,0.00002375096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047980264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07595634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047980264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021291736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014193126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09540194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413864450","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf050","title":"Personality and Preferences for Territorial Scales","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Personality; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04618670269146222,"score_gpt":0.3580669042018638,"score_spread":0.31188020151040163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413864450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967951,0.00003646091,0.00019072421,0.00010469739,0.000006286835,0.0000053667895,0.00007944376,0.000002583495,0.0027792174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995659,0.0000173305,0.00008995272,0.000011578893,0.000003792243,0.0000024591552,0.00003954036,6.526598e-7,0.00026875138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996705,0.00013961182,0.000021419417,0.000035001485,0.00007583017,0.000057688103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963031,0.0008916385,0.0016230899,0.00024238149,0.00031103258,0.0006287131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008236718,0.00010213152,0.00010883764,0.00043606161,0.00035909296,0.00088021916,0.000079874975,0.00020805065,0.0036252455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003353367,0.00006424188,0.0002025819,0.00038514865,0.00032492616,0.00023595217,0.00032992996,0.0003831747,0.00030195605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005626268,0.00004751734,0.9886783,0.000012514658,0.000043333457,0.00005846662,0.0008734465,0.00017143095,0.000642951,0.0004242526,0.00037360477,0.008617944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001895881,0.000032972257,0.998228,0.0000063484176,0.0000041391336,0.000039209408,0.00076249155,0.00022156961,0.000046146204,0.00024944643,0.00040452834,0.0000031693464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025788452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004580438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036252455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020435273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012741014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012127638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416107846","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf067","title":"<i>Constraining the Court: Judicial Power and Policy Implementation in the Charter Era</i> , by James B. Kelly","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Power (physics); Judicial review; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.012898358641686102,"score_gpt":0.3258684917914153,"score_spread":0.3129701331497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416107846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010711095,0.02450284,0.002638632,0.8178675,0.0024301182,0.000022485541,0.00007538543,0.000051959643,0.14169985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7545256,0.02574569,0.0030614363,0.15674719,0.0061810426,0.00013486115,0.00005659953,0.00014787453,0.053399764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701966,0.0074314955,0.00031347497,0.0009687414,0.00237908,0.0018874767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753921,0.019609092,0.0016523751,0.000557335,0.0019269281,0.00086214533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014156931,0.00030890887,0.0004492801,0.0012128985,0.009725821,0.02194674,0.0015882629,0.010791514,0.0059619783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052364826,0.0005408414,0.00039993817,0.0021720654,0.02349886,0.011142301,0.0039628423,0.010328738,0.0008351428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027357235,0.000012255676,0.0003775905,0.00006349281,0.0000074272352,0.00004404121,0.0026925514,0.00041399218,0.00013299244,0.8738152,0.11438092,0.008032181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043735097,0.000024950086,0.0033150788,0.00069415534,0.000030825555,0.000047287693,0.0089650825,0.0012115333,0.00065707177,0.5585505,0.4263807,0.00007906875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08594693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1354333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08594693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013031538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030435188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17089331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417012236","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf077","title":"Measuring Identity in Substate Nations: Evidence from Quebec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Politics; Nationalism; Multinational corporation; Scale (ratio); Survey data collection","score_opus":0.06284534241470319,"score_gpt":0.34210134711310003,"score_spread":0.27925600469839684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417012236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676888,0.0010170956,0.0012132316,0.0013842813,0.00003636336,0.0001293063,0.004953122,0.000018972432,0.02355891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952009,0.00026708518,0.00049970084,0.0001729666,0.000004575753,0.00004509552,0.0012789913,0.0000067033366,0.002523838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705124,0.0012154552,0.00010890933,0.00037330217,0.00083673076,0.0004143032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97608805,0.005660224,0.0029113574,0.0014086119,0.012647035,0.0012847238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00410266,0.000250856,0.00035151283,0.002311248,0.0036490888,0.0018381543,0.0011826223,0.00043738633,0.004984558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014514911,0.00014792531,0.00027442197,0.006434324,0.0018418264,0.0008413009,0.0012956397,0.00077504164,0.00028826052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024880664,0.00023353167,0.9182814,0.0002327568,0.00020272854,0.000251307,0.015299718,0.0011381404,0.00051340164,0.006658821,0.011171992,0.045767393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001975823,0.00005158981,0.97818804,0.00015417759,0.000049106693,0.000033268316,0.009655579,0.0011615503,0.00031556693,0.00026075062,0.010082067,0.000028595752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02573745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02573745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014474881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18673915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417102099","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf078","title":"Trade Attitudes and Federalism: A Study of Provincial Public Opinion toward Canada–US Trade","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Autonomy; Public opinion; Socioeconomic status; Free trade; Trade barrier; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.03147223694592316,"score_gpt":0.3047632790127334,"score_spread":0.27329104206681026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417102099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99236757,0.000055272238,0.000050280996,0.00082226924,0.0000062793697,0.000009742704,0.0001742985,0.0000021426836,0.0065122363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992774,0.00003159976,0.0000186225,0.00006640713,0.0000024103751,0.000002636335,0.00006626447,0.0000012701688,0.00053328084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981027,0.00033975817,0.00004926286,0.00011902147,0.00060748006,0.0007817844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976445,0.0025255107,0.0018797066,0.00027484406,0.0038197353,0.0017357483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002548978,0.00010206444,0.00024745808,0.0014959552,0.006780658,0.002498397,0.00064465194,0.0004991562,0.004319111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00857348,0.00012996154,0.00032718884,0.0038788805,0.0027169834,0.0006050962,0.0011589427,0.0011937813,0.00017870033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022866967,0.00014122138,0.909372,0.000036961348,0.000048975264,0.00013051629,0.07111339,0.00029119052,0.00036695806,0.0036868465,0.003312889,0.011270425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009416054,0.000031113654,0.9113122,0.000038984752,0.000016663977,0.000024642188,0.08193417,0.0006575996,0.00010864113,0.00031943433,0.005524033,0.000023026068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98776186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99143434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040084053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040084053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034865063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2908315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117362574","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf081","title":"Co-Determination: A Central Feature of Multinational Federalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Federalism; Normative; Appeal; Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015151899534510764,"score_gpt":0.3211126147163474,"score_spread":0.30596071518183665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117362574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3017547,0.0012808836,0.1627686,0.027707579,0.00029779132,0.00015501966,0.00010517321,0.00017908652,0.5057512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962888,0.000064523236,0.0019616615,0.00019945933,0.00004972365,0.000027251876,0.00000837566,0.000009318345,0.0013908554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388075,0.0026168104,0.0002689678,0.0011515596,0.0013409917,0.00074094604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877366,0.0044752425,0.0019612184,0.0032136266,0.0018225552,0.0007906651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069971657,0.000113411385,0.00069172477,0.000916884,0.004611235,0.0049394756,0.0008457631,0.0021338926,0.003317524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013551736,0.00024291372,0.00043403704,0.0012483204,0.019593282,0.0050523295,0.005019194,0.0026589306,0.0002805831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004927802,0.000006551828,0.000524171,0.0000065245426,0.000004275061,0.000027476817,0.0009089107,0.00022848867,0.00005241575,0.9955409,0.00046797958,0.0022272784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007685929,0.0000063502084,0.000771294,0.000021342334,0.0000037802993,0.00006788999,0.00048255298,0.0011097088,0.00010848872,0.9904198,0.0069946386,0.0000064620494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024156591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002449925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069971657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029631979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027769844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037005007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117368511","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjaf079","title":"Settler Federalism and the Conditions of Indigenous Autonomy: A Comparative Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Federalism; Autonomy; Jurisdiction; Self-determination; Treaty; Unitary state","score_opus":0.022586672783967622,"score_gpt":0.34634138228563577,"score_spread":0.3237547095016681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117368511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255171,0.00034853606,0.00022539713,0.00055186957,0.00000916989,0.00001722407,0.000016396403,0.0000022407048,0.073312074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00009388382,0.00004666346,0.000023861132,0.000002512828,0.0000033312235,0.0000047784015,7.276842e-7,0.0005635386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973393,0.0010678958,0.0000627194,0.0001948926,0.00051583635,0.0008192125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734277,0.0012681832,0.00047171078,0.00018661158,0.00045641145,0.00027424187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029170602,0.00007021053,0.00033149726,0.0013776978,0.010299208,0.003135998,0.0007248147,0.0007426289,0.003859259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007365264,0.00010793103,0.00011991444,0.0020836696,0.010770789,0.001742141,0.0031719182,0.0012269727,0.000063653955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007385695,0.0001509581,0.047833648,0.00012896405,0.000027436461,0.0017684621,0.53349084,0.000364925,0.0008307552,0.38823962,0.0010010095,0.02608947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022914719,0.00011503661,0.2538147,0.00032083094,0.0000464552,0.00065951515,0.6706944,0.0006476598,0.00048537142,0.016393352,0.05675407,0.00004561262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34489438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57751596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34489438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012893214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077688135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68577373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}