{"meta":{"query_hash":"b6bc1cd2abf9","filters":{"venue":"Qualitative Research"},"cohort_total":91,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":91,"exported":91,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b6bc1cd2abf9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Qualitative+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1966332451","doi":"10.1177/1468794112455037","title":"Doing participatory qualitative research: development of a shared critical consciousness with racial minority research advisory group members","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; Association of Local Public Health Agencies; York University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Dialogical self; Critical consciousness; Sociology; General partnership; Participatory action research; Public relations; Qualitative research; Community-based participatory research; Consciousness; Community development; Photovoice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9089431206035483,"score_gpt":0.7810056252157593,"score_spread":0.12793749538778898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966332451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93362784,0.0019638496,0.0029611338,0.0019521775,0.00024490713,0.0028425953,0.000097353746,0.00012895554,0.056181185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546151,0.0000491109,0.04141132,0.00002523717,0.0005236027,0.0019461852,0.00001545383,0.000078467114,0.0013355252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7315404,0.24131072,0.0015415427,0.001327678,0.017026814,0.007252865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8437418,0.1386657,0.00022538345,0.0010357704,0.01322092,0.0031104456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4363225,0.00042239678,0.0009875007,0.0023903786,0.006154246,0.00035654407,0.0017154688,0.00047926544,0.0012719829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12317804,0.00038431303,0.00016802871,0.0070307804,0.028380528,0.0017997664,0.0011257413,0.0043945247,0.0005167119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001081713,0.0012261986,0.0015286567,0.00042792203,0.00014018932,0.000025538306,0.7451068,6.6525956e-7,0.0032757602,0.2416377,0.0018606372,0.0036881692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093861425,0.0009283208,0.0019873825,0.00043487837,0.000015482889,9.54227e-7,0.90921617,0.000028180899,0.0044873846,0.010565848,0.07087572,0.00052109244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005962985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007723076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31314448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024485798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073608668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981067518","doi":"10.1177/1468794114538896","title":"Talking, wrestling, and recycling: an investigation of three analytic approaches to qualitative data in education research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Ethnomethodology; Conversation; Sociology; Conversation analysis; Semiotics; Qualitative research; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Sociocultural evolution; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social science; Communication","score_opus":0.9264210981600284,"score_gpt":0.7326231661017149,"score_spread":0.19379793205831353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981067518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95741224,0.0006547432,0.006325629,0.02221895,0.00008449326,0.001700657,0.00005128182,0.000033444165,0.011518584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94130695,0.00024336761,0.057088967,0.00006484165,0.00028122403,0.00017414057,0.00009544767,0.000040176077,0.0007048717],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84053785,0.15090278,0.0010143173,0.0014188222,0.004682231,0.0014440276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345704,0.059261624,0.0002455573,0.0015040186,0.0033887362,0.0010296683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37754554,0.00020343966,0.00052145583,0.0021649292,0.0010257878,0.00029210723,0.0015336917,0.00028909804,0.000041224168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10143004,0.00019841883,0.00004235001,0.004801639,0.0067400057,0.0011249051,0.0007356128,0.0018874931,0.00003826337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007491137,0.00012876131,0.0024721911,0.00015627024,0.000017361332,4.3396034e-7,0.5532347,0.0000034838076,0.00028453878,0.42254588,0.00029609064,0.020785358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017606714,0.00045156732,0.0035615563,0.00022810475,0.0000031170207,1.177251e-7,0.5497314,0.00094757444,0.000107388245,0.44281945,0.0018210886,0.00015257909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046021625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039044045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2761155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043835075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026974652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959631},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1988588354","doi":"10.1177/1468794114543400","title":"Apprenticeship as method: embodied learning in ethnographic practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Emic and etic; Ethnography; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pedagogy; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8886648517063099,"score_gpt":0.8267451170160557,"score_spread":0.06191973469025425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988588354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18562876,0.00043128047,0.014501084,0.0114220325,0.00014810642,0.0011047347,0.0000018804101,0.0001891242,0.786573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615192,0.00013029843,0.031841103,0.00018791732,0.00021118649,0.0003359398,0.000003070515,0.000036688398,0.005734621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.76211524,0.23111378,0.0004948368,0.00068446546,0.0037893122,0.0018023661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89142257,0.105652556,0.00016791144,0.00042168322,0.00163695,0.0006983142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2941374,0.00016438098,0.00036601466,0.0011351431,0.001284998,0.00030018986,0.0008019378,0.00022781886,0.0004201945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33671892,0.00016561401,0.000098910976,0.004010055,0.0018993003,0.0008111555,0.00025796855,0.002541807,0.00077918154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018664646,0.00019404166,0.0010032568,0.000046337824,0.000031370168,0.000013591162,0.46172068,0.00003918974,0.0005900066,0.49415162,0.00027983214,0.041743428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005631698,0.0005161854,0.00081290805,0.000085828986,0.000008183372,4.1086946e-7,0.61524576,0.0015681228,0.00043555343,0.1090839,0.271417,0.00026295445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012460114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020448763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7808384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003367532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086694636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996716493","doi":"10.1177/1468794111404319","title":"Interpreter-facilitated cross-language interviews: a research note","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Qualitative research; Grandparent; Mandarin Chinese; Psychology; Semi-structured interview; Process (computing); Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.8626783080133277,"score_gpt":0.7844615248927833,"score_spread":0.07821678312054436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996716493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2838464,0.0024359787,0.011764552,0.0065768124,0.0004379688,0.002463253,0.00018780936,0.00030187846,0.6919853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948997,0.00061978045,0.017416812,0.00011226547,0.00032703465,0.00053687196,0.000019178895,0.00007774689,0.03189326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8445357,0.14481036,0.00092529546,0.0011180184,0.0055791903,0.0030314508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554236,0.035264067,0.00012751008,0.0009812725,0.0071813976,0.0010221618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28718764,0.00030932436,0.0005714269,0.0015911335,0.0030363074,0.00056165236,0.0021583976,0.00048774056,0.0051634586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07994916,0.0002757211,0.00028328717,0.004441351,0.018507725,0.00094973133,0.0009453468,0.004727446,0.0031608716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033590713,0.0002209593,0.0001298135,0.00014138893,0.00005820336,0.00006019246,0.8185016,7.995195e-8,0.0014227701,0.15328214,0.003292004,0.02255497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043827127,0.00088798784,0.00034242214,0.00027061804,0.0000030923911,0.0000010170643,0.7508203,0.0000405684,0.0021470801,0.1930957,0.0516203,0.00033267302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029373871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006678328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66515064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010703845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016955885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003330906","doi":"10.1177/1468794113495037","title":"The commonplace journey methodology: exploring outdoor recreation activities through theoretically-informed reflective practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Outdoor and Experiential Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Existentialism; Sociology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Lived experience; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7039338883095084,"score_gpt":0.6823557642623752,"score_spread":0.021578124047133218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003330906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30068445,0.0012027259,0.014483857,0.045114476,0.0024003868,0.0022700306,0.000013135762,0.00015886145,0.63367206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573433,0.0005981098,0.022276614,0.00047535606,0.00053856627,0.0045704315,0.000027261622,0.00006510388,0.01410526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97682035,0.02056342,0.00048081597,0.0004349398,0.00080271106,0.00089776696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400595,0.057692524,0.0001981338,0.0005895694,0.0013102187,0.00015008637],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013911991,0.00020115777,0.0002758487,0.0001798841,0.0013177029,0.00033059952,0.00044655107,0.00016623986,0.0018036069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024030972,0.00014052738,0.000096956326,0.00071465963,0.0013977913,0.0015910538,0.00013884863,0.0011612696,0.0016498311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064417993,0.00012578371,0.000010961545,0.000009722025,0.00014273169,0.0000012524632,0.53512186,4.1970142e-7,0.00080372294,0.4337623,0.020083262,0.009293754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035634264,0.00045123225,0.0004977239,0.000026493719,0.000014410056,0.000009838005,0.8255492,0.000008212007,0.003732023,0.12186995,0.047331415,0.00015318966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030170365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076949626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6566588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040499837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028864952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005372738","doi":"10.1177/1468794106065005","title":"Expressions of personhood in Alzheimer’s: moving from ethnographic text to performing ethnography","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Nurses Foundation","keywords":"Personhood; Embodied cognition; Ethnography; Sociology; Immediacy; Appeal; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.8564210565874426,"score_gpt":0.7527300817271043,"score_spread":0.10369097486033829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005372738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97865856,0.0016747115,0.000623587,0.0012384312,0.000054612086,0.0007414877,0.000046091693,0.00004175464,0.01692077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98910356,0.000056501176,0.010198528,0.000027035961,0.00013520775,0.0002785419,0.000005620979,0.000026115953,0.00016892226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97339535,0.021067705,0.0006047324,0.0005757264,0.0029003313,0.0014561331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519754,0.013086663,0.00009701655,0.0003914465,0.00077582616,0.00045148478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037415046,0.00016719745,0.00039157155,0.001959938,0.00088139425,0.00008938711,0.00077702256,0.00019559407,0.00037363096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011078756,0.00016364625,0.0001549981,0.005493513,0.0018946015,0.00041211126,0.0002715493,0.0010056667,0.00006871175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013943184,0.0004106941,0.022637699,0.000026439053,0.00007056538,0.000013686976,0.8758303,0.000030639294,0.06293031,0.023396943,0.00090779545,0.0136054875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051028345,0.0002923516,0.029334007,0.00039237805,0.0000120231,5.5803905e-8,0.9201042,0.00019368285,0.0125943795,0.03076251,0.005485665,0.0003184669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08127265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011434077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069838576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016383975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005973514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99725133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013537486","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446104","title":"‘If you can call it a poem’: toward a framework for the assessment of arts-based works","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Performative utterance; Sociology; Arts in education; Normative; Visual arts; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.9252908332090877,"score_gpt":0.8223612904170058,"score_spread":0.10292954279208189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013537486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060489044,0.0012609904,0.85392904,0.065070465,0.00043217986,0.0041633896,0.00016448014,0.00007041069,0.014419972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341597,0.00006911551,0.0629426,0.00022435568,0.00039540647,0.0012297295,0.00000405266,0.000027276832,0.0009477649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758431,0.01849835,0.00043234607,0.0003223275,0.0031180452,0.0017858442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346238,0.062716305,0.00013366842,0.00046702143,0.0014492476,0.0006099964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0970705,0.00014989462,0.00033960212,0.00024593636,0.0010651505,0.00014419353,0.0008620896,0.00020531843,0.00039374546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04738226,0.000109073546,0.00018218473,0.0014292885,0.0025892856,0.00022590169,0.00015784973,0.0010540122,0.00002294463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015786737,0.00041934117,0.004088015,0.00011608901,0.000116651056,0.0000013216035,0.41203016,0.000022729315,0.00037475897,0.56207407,0.0040381714,0.016560808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009251946,0.0009946395,0.00925962,0.00045286654,0.000042362764,1.2375392e-7,0.76034874,0.0041225334,0.0019010123,0.06975617,0.15176035,0.00043638036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003066572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047612982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87367064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002370649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96064204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017795280","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076021","title":"Nostalgia, goodness and ethical paradox","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Sociology; Aesthetics; Construct (python library); Power (physics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.370335316527473,"score_gpt":0.6624588903577446,"score_spread":0.29212357383027165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017795280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583385,0.00097042543,0.0007785393,0.002283103,0.0002036386,0.00034513618,0.000024438936,0.000048590846,0.037007622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262005,0.00001392719,0.00034582842,0.00015208426,0.000066674584,0.000060277707,0.000009772455,0.000026377673,0.0067050145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950718,0.002553042,0.00031758804,0.00048149898,0.00072607485,0.0008499632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934918,0.0054823197,0.00003843247,0.00034837457,0.00033861762,0.00030041963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011783223,0.00013729985,0.00020847429,0.0002878978,0.00025437074,0.00004897267,0.00021235384,0.0003502958,0.0013031338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005662605,0.00012454248,0.000049643062,0.0005433608,0.0010556547,0.000043103068,0.00012746165,0.0016317638,0.0013015069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006995112,0.000330358,0.012327411,0.000058270307,0.000107303356,0.0004555601,0.28083885,9.2199475e-9,0.0064816745,0.59298813,0.0096697565,0.096043155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002400607,0.0010584345,0.4167933,0.00007361451,0.000031115338,0.000085010404,0.51624185,0.0000016295087,0.0032115814,0.03544068,0.024019489,0.0006427053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061874633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006847902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55754745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051809173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006466425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017994899","doi":"10.1177/1468794105056924","title":"Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1012,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Focus group; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12380968316149689,"score_gpt":0.5506791787967483,"score_spread":0.42686949563525145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017994899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851871,0.0021909873,0.002333557,0.0028503644,0.00014369933,0.0005349488,0.000060442686,0.000025752686,0.0066731465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956402,0.00014859509,0.0019178955,0.00023093638,0.00009846678,0.00009235403,0.0000022101065,0.00001988905,0.0018494547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644214,0.0019944713,0.00027771454,0.0002740442,0.0006193579,0.0003922991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611515,0.0029874535,0.000044706543,0.00040676486,0.00036095173,0.00008499025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005101479,0.00009225658,0.00017273008,0.00015297232,0.00013586726,0.000023813887,0.0003034628,0.00012777442,0.0003038463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008446768,0.00007432419,0.00006470734,0.00039270453,0.0011849364,0.000059231916,0.000106406704,0.00058424164,0.00006438701],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024754673,0.0004300302,0.0012097689,0.000058454585,0.000083553234,0.000011267502,0.73069257,0.0000029767616,0.004293557,0.2135875,0.014962259,0.034420554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022324072,0.0014923154,0.10430965,0.0002042522,0.000036699068,0.00004701482,0.57717824,0.0001928038,0.00040743154,0.2163549,0.09686903,0.000675263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002934441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010120145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15351431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085615895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085601256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43659472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020575600","doi":"10.1177/1468794103033007","title":"&amp;lsquo;Giving Voice&amp;rsquo; to Students: Using the Internet for Data Collection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Ethnic group; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.927024663724717,"score_gpt":0.760420218698501,"score_spread":0.16660444502621607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020575600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197671,0.00021469941,0.17312384,0.0025441025,0.0005353504,0.0013701267,0.000054159955,0.00003317909,0.0023574347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7777293,0.00008148371,0.11080395,0.00058330415,0.00048849743,0.0004050605,0.00006352504,0.00006166234,0.10978325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85172474,0.14538348,0.00031165048,0.0005589006,0.0012396241,0.0007816369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88575256,0.112546384,0.00007424118,0.00062337104,0.00083229534,0.00017112168],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30341348,0.000108943794,0.0001976663,0.00027697958,0.0017891361,0.00021018894,0.0012216924,0.0001290564,0.00030855727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24876358,0.00008712031,0.00005118639,0.0015576271,0.0007181558,0.0002572561,0.0003240414,0.00043328363,0.00016896437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034257344,0.00024180434,0.008560946,0.0000338142,0.00019307336,0.0000018900612,0.9043804,0.000010484852,0.0022868263,0.021361155,0.0581847,0.0013192209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046808732,0.0001765142,0.004049915,0.000055684104,0.000014512292,0.0000016636862,0.22552077,0.000053294156,0.00032933475,0.009121096,0.7599872,0.00022196195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007947277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020194586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7018025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003297355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029413296","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337877","title":"The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Visual research; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Psychology; Point (geometry); Value (mathematics); Representation (politics); Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Geography; Political science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.8454495203515204,"score_gpt":0.8040831670268701,"score_spread":0.04136635332465033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029413296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130857,0.00044379922,0.00024539407,0.027994944,0.00010195679,0.0010617821,0.000006181205,0.00006890642,0.056991346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936403,0.00018136651,0.0015916666,0.00006779968,0.00037052616,0.0001162824,0.0000036447511,0.00002990092,0.0039985157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.798154,0.18761003,0.00081458216,0.0009464488,0.008511414,0.003963559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94228566,0.0537147,0.00010298858,0.00061868585,0.0023951726,0.00088281493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36627275,0.00020821583,0.0003554019,0.0008925648,0.013608453,0.003291593,0.0012847384,0.00022609624,0.00022036175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17658216,0.00013254453,0.00012447363,0.0047321287,0.012696884,0.0012405996,0.000506444,0.003220504,0.00054344727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015992712,0.00073678367,0.0015072268,0.000041873634,0.000020136706,0.00018395772,0.70591396,0.0000010691683,0.03093479,0.147357,0.0034091503,0.10829477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005754866,0.0009827801,0.017713014,0.0002418836,0.0000023258442,0.0000018278402,0.4761692,0.00025296886,0.0033661728,0.44749236,0.052911684,0.00029031018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011807752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028721094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30013534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020185406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048223757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043162520","doi":"10.1177/1468794108099320","title":"Multiple text analysis in narrative research: visual, written, and spoken stories of experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Construct (python library); Reading (process); Narrative network; Narrative inquiry; Narrative criticism; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5614235798992749,"score_gpt":0.6945102678409579,"score_spread":0.133086687941683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043162520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989705,0.00057603297,0.00009616002,0.001560053,0.000050221235,0.0005508496,0.000013948952,0.00001672593,0.00743097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995582,0.00013578558,0.00031362107,0.00003549212,0.000066975575,0.00014697827,0.000020270454,0.000009610554,0.003689268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971564,0.007500191,0.00054860185,0.0004158297,0.0010623323,0.0007574108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869795,0.01085209,0.000103719285,0.0002564347,0.001626506,0.00018178417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137998415,0.00011060292,0.000367064,0.0013256975,0.00080695987,0.00002742484,0.00020978697,0.00013016333,0.00014669633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007992834,0.00009706353,0.00004641773,0.003841958,0.0008532455,0.00031304653,0.000091100614,0.0010732178,0.000056433062],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217559,0.0002632885,0.040420275,0.000069115944,0.00003818006,0.00000216452,0.94943947,0.0000057137167,0.0008830178,0.0041386173,0.0015058408,0.0030125673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029864543,0.00044656507,0.10656489,0.00014420529,0.0000039821566,6.44879e-8,0.88490826,0.00018310278,0.0002860598,0.0052906657,0.0017801215,0.0000934311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004486872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012949859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066144615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034274568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003995687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95687467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7126574550515453,"score_gpt":0.634758587860571,"score_spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045612295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56516755,0.00040260056,0.41018397,0.019462243,0.00019596338,0.0024544445,0.000013757107,0.0000731487,0.0020463688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968732,0.000030261861,0.1010139,0.000087253924,0.00017746014,0.00064261205,0.0000015956545,0.000030153631,0.0011435847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754547,0.021045774,0.00029344196,0.00043741814,0.0013136416,0.0014550431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859338,0.012499382,0.000068351466,0.00024335962,0.0005478175,0.00070729054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04366878,0.00017893413,0.00032652018,0.0006222053,0.0005747258,0.0003031202,0.00029290587,0.00009200845,0.00010612802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006617971,0.00014554086,0.000050446917,0.0025531985,0.00042406027,0.0010834772,0.000108133645,0.0005577023,0.00017164441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049003965,0.00021425376,0.0024073347,0.000024840723,0.000033662916,0.0000056369104,0.85111374,0.000034388184,0.0016094757,0.13036714,0.002014347,0.011685118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004050762,0.001194419,0.0047388305,0.00025328528,0.000008757544,4.6313696e-7,0.9241933,0.000036889887,0.0010194558,0.0060514915,0.06172177,0.00037621422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012961767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015984267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33170566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047202967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013062112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048310586","doi":"10.1177/1468794103003001770","title":"Exposing failures, unsettling accommodations: tensions in interview practice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Conceptualization; Vulnerability (computing); Qualitative research; Sociology; Power (physics); Semi-structured interview; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8056848262636709,"score_gpt":0.7474369098650276,"score_spread":0.05824791639864324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048310586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019597493,0.011737861,0.10274156,0.3727119,0.0004595836,0.0034391922,0.00005460418,0.00020935485,0.48904845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206181,0.006140584,0.26650792,0.0011854831,0.00024100445,0.0005313835,0.00002439236,0.00008557787,0.00466554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8417981,0.1530742,0.0006599706,0.0005703168,0.002547909,0.0013494615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918616,0.07773522,0.00012711005,0.00039571684,0.0027627044,0.00036324753],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21176094,0.00015509008,0.0003185078,0.0007705905,0.0017211785,0.00033747507,0.0004932827,0.00020085489,0.00039729007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22876991,0.00014705026,0.00009387009,0.0032028516,0.0023288655,0.0010762386,0.00013283934,0.0021020633,0.00024216186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016406188,0.0001330835,0.000025280677,0.00003827908,0.000017464383,0.000015652522,0.35235906,0.000003581611,0.00019490287,0.6402379,0.0011319898,0.005826354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020241833,0.00007004029,0.000034667766,0.00021093417,0.000002508395,9.939929e-7,0.56375676,0.000016508506,0.00010939659,0.16277285,0.2726983,0.00012459031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007594275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034607048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70102066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006278312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015343885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050898615","doi":"10.1177/1468794113509261","title":"Advocating beyond the academy: dilemmas of communicating relevant research results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Sociology; Public relations; Participatory action research; Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Work (physics); Community-based participatory research; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.775037321702685,"score_gpt":0.7288378966725597,"score_spread":0.04619942503012531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050898615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17231013,0.0030193692,0.000579227,0.39233384,0.00011642437,0.004105367,0.00010481202,0.00010439695,0.42732644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965415,0.002170161,0.021552801,0.00019035107,0.0003657469,0.00070268434,0.0000147980545,0.000054922133,0.009533564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.794736,0.1935873,0.0013305095,0.00070191897,0.0072817537,0.002362467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7174558,0.27080727,0.0004236454,0.0013570149,0.009326788,0.0006294761],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38993543,0.00020884634,0.0004812077,0.0006712464,0.005936413,0.00039852544,0.003075169,0.00037279748,0.00037629172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18778296,0.00014669095,0.00016558569,0.0046005906,0.020174215,0.00063909596,0.0013355315,0.0064846333,0.000577367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000602499,0.00008184066,0.00003934887,0.000076267694,0.00003992525,8.758891e-7,0.4932796,0.0000013297381,0.0024127085,0.47207648,0.0142121455,0.017719222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029119494,0.0002200018,0.0004313376,0.00017378808,0.0000022497134,2.5232583e-7,0.57357806,0.00011567557,0.0008339912,0.37695977,0.047261514,0.00013213669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044271097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010542772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004792092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001621564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052860698","doi":"10.1177/1468794107082305","title":"Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sociology; Identity (music); Politics; Socialization; Ideology; Qualitative research; Narrative; Power (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.7115118991827734,"score_gpt":0.7857387431437663,"score_spread":0.074226843960993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052860698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88825876,0.0009154489,0.005724898,0.011013979,0.0001542276,0.0011629092,0.00002668385,0.00002809572,0.09271499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936415,0.00016648238,0.0033839236,0.000025411213,0.0003782754,0.00005260291,0.000004926359,0.00002497018,0.0023218854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8483531,0.1382992,0.001188265,0.00071270106,0.008367985,0.0030787901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063751,0.0870172,0.0001389652,0.0006294898,0.0053430945,0.0004961419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.46464443,0.00013484065,0.00032701957,0.0012705305,0.0034361507,0.00029116342,0.0015521933,0.00024570333,0.00010589639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04797972,0.00010389985,0.0000918894,0.005421595,0.012342132,0.0010238439,0.0010596626,0.0035191197,0.00005310704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005251525,0.00015510085,0.0010131671,0.00004829605,0.000009385735,0.0000070701863,0.4874497,0.00000329729,0.00049623585,0.5080794,0.0003429822,0.0023428244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014049848,0.00029666052,0.004393908,0.00007790398,8.699822e-7,2.0759268e-7,0.6239853,0.000079041994,0.00018624097,0.36951697,0.0012449019,0.00007751069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02156805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028141255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41666472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008262231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013944007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6043639673826666,"score_gpt":0.600795378554305,"score_spread":0.0035685888283616407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791074,0.0003512565,0.0020281489,0.0017943484,0.000012675607,0.0031369964,0.000049873142,0.000042576987,0.013476736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97105736,0.00013867259,0.027911508,0.0000028535653,0.0000074518452,0.0006807255,0.000004433758,0.000023276903,0.0001737221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97489184,0.022045687,0.00044709753,0.00028077015,0.0015921353,0.00074246695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481035,0.04770751,0.00014350936,0.0007263033,0.0032319846,0.00008721074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036413997,0.00014057703,0.00035102584,0.0010801407,0.002839693,0.00004782519,0.00091280055,0.00008432964,0.00002899184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006187272,0.00010872034,0.00002099799,0.0040796613,0.0034921297,0.0002563364,0.0002274358,0.0009482064,0.0000011559108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003488682,0.00045961665,0.0027285062,0.00011134513,0.000059474376,0.000073651136,0.8874434,0.000004712708,0.0000020122864,0.10616885,0.00009425903,0.0025052729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010270023,0.0026876216,0.000490778,0.00028204164,0.0000057246225,0.000005923831,0.9698704,0.000060448216,0.00007384265,0.024875693,0.00047445772,0.00014610344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08242693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011206844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026961183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053888554","doi":"10.1177/1468794109348680","title":"Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnography; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Institution; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Narrative inquiry; Engineering ethics; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6951726244112297,"score_gpt":0.6988167302744593,"score_spread":0.0036441058632296075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053888554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8414897,0.0005348596,0.12184982,0.023904406,0.00052548904,0.0029484436,0.00021463864,0.00024585528,0.008286798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5487102,0.00011490092,0.4500283,0.00006670485,0.00026016744,0.00056154566,0.00002816053,0.00001992067,0.00021006238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614663,0.034319334,0.00048477226,0.0007368775,0.0018943115,0.001098404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458626,0.050485224,0.00014638207,0.00032903353,0.0026065616,0.00057018816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14523281,0.00022074694,0.00038020825,0.0007926196,0.006141481,0.0003751279,0.0005709986,0.00037718003,0.000083872386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476323,0.0001950058,0.00014723762,0.0015775285,0.015338254,0.00088287453,0.0002065947,0.002070921,0.0000061592696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097564494,0.00008219804,0.00049228425,0.00006094457,0.0000433447,0.0000015794052,0.4192478,0.0000018595073,0.008751115,0.54944646,0.00021453238,0.021560317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043134997,0.00043573667,0.0008967783,0.000026741605,0.0000037257798,4.3887368e-7,0.5132677,0.0002354131,0.0007505797,0.47101128,0.012740652,0.00019960855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003390547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009749649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3281785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009172262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010906572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063123176","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446105","title":"Storytelling in a digital age: digital storytelling as an emerging narrative method for preserving and promoting indigenous oral wisdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Indigenous; Digital storytelling; Narrative; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Ecology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.34966023256063744,"score_gpt":0.6162015810418132,"score_spread":0.2665413484811758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063123176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97948974,0.0013160775,0.010984404,0.00023204507,0.00036600712,0.00242603,0.0000621446,0.000112975795,0.005010586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876996,0.000027619444,0.007852489,0.000048734484,0.00060265453,0.00064257433,0.00016088267,0.000105669205,0.0028597242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928084,0.0027784128,0.00085894135,0.0007088587,0.0008372372,0.0020081596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881562,0.009777978,0.00027895154,0.0003497131,0.00083201437,0.0006051477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01690682,0.00032408643,0.0005233628,0.00069013564,0.0019693624,0.0003348896,0.00035301415,0.00026241195,0.000051643703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071303654,0.000316646,0.000081641076,0.00078142824,0.00030383648,0.0034389838,0.00022183626,0.0015471535,0.00007575617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023488085,0.00039894658,0.010362683,0.00054160843,0.000056283,0.000004413464,0.94687426,0.00002868372,0.00019908587,0.0020758675,0.0001515702,0.03907172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091091817,0.0006670793,0.00089672994,0.00070396264,0.000011615946,0.0000037893005,0.9571565,0.0021166636,0.00012309584,0.023035996,0.0138722,0.00050148176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082938245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015471155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03857024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007379336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061642664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063288048","doi":"10.1177/1468794113481795","title":"Popularizing ethnography: reflections on writing for popular audiences in magazines and blogs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Media studies; Popular media; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7688613729027349,"score_gpt":0.7343597915147355,"score_spread":0.034501581387999414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063288048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80016154,0.0014687172,0.0052704783,0.09926811,0.000188186,0.0038178766,0.000044008862,0.00012315276,0.08965794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329277,0.0010083797,0.0611219,0.00026515799,0.0002576769,0.0012990347,0.0000095082305,0.000033490287,0.0030771506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803034,0.016381273,0.00041750175,0.00051365624,0.0012713317,0.0011128422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98003525,0.018224435,0.00007221316,0.00017197418,0.0012262685,0.00026986623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05411267,0.00014206274,0.00027895832,0.000903417,0.002129748,0.00032120143,0.00030185672,0.00018625362,0.000055410055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022253366,0.00012711025,0.00008493322,0.002314628,0.0030642098,0.0004814555,0.00008947861,0.0010322091,0.00003925873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028281293,0.00007557122,0.001583002,0.000080062266,0.000019099763,0.0000020791413,0.39577153,0.0000012591229,0.0012604614,0.582931,0.00090073264,0.017346933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022969714,0.00034120955,0.0027820917,0.00013761122,0.0000016122393,1.6585867e-7,0.5534308,0.000040237057,0.000049046437,0.43376377,0.009083672,0.00014009271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030129785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011227384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15765925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001790301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025240815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063364875","doi":"10.1177/1468794104041106","title":"What’s So Funny?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Solidarity; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social justice; Gender studies; Social solidarity; Epistemology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.5065192918331807,"score_gpt":0.686000224803707,"score_spread":0.17948093297052636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063364875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31283346,0.008334298,0.0023681347,0.10324853,0.0009121586,0.0013404498,0.000062320614,0.00017853864,0.5707221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794508,0.00019272132,0.0004459337,0.0001796286,0.00017769518,0.00050930656,0.0000076167057,0.000018984614,0.019017287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777186,0.00078376225,0.0001810906,0.00032529974,0.00041023918,0.00052776956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983289,0.00093996234,0.00002710071,0.0003780045,0.00021576555,0.000110227724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025330952,0.000082816514,0.00013144186,0.0001271592,0.00054619403,0.00010801799,0.00024070653,0.000054436026,0.0016368374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001751171,0.00007269767,0.000052775507,0.0005780257,0.00063582795,0.000068280686,0.000098937424,0.0003833493,0.009343541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015921101,0.00014292868,0.00001075659,0.0000047346557,0.000044925207,0.0000070845504,0.25782084,7.9691534e-7,0.00014506401,0.7211606,0.014290412,0.006355931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051569985,0.00019429186,0.0013785657,0.000022301136,0.0000024402766,0.00000211507,0.6013848,3.9085756e-7,0.00016793756,0.14955056,0.24667616,0.00010473549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008092272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013473269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66661733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100074365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078850746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108368184","doi":"10.1177/1468794115569561","title":"Men can change: transformation, agency, ethics and closure during critical dialogue in interviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Compassion; CONTEST; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Distancing; Social psychology; Closure (psychology); Friendship; Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.8588660113801196,"score_gpt":0.7283389263296247,"score_spread":0.13052708505049493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108368184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47978657,0.0048523783,0.0025142105,0.43463102,0.0002640508,0.002518805,0.00018227895,0.0001014196,0.07514926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404603,0.0026376646,0.0019797275,0.0001796112,0.00025832627,0.00031863406,0.000012348199,0.00002157158,0.0005461044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9078542,0.08774076,0.00049638253,0.00039806645,0.002462457,0.0010481265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747963,0.022248926,0.000045758035,0.0001965012,0.0020158633,0.00069664663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17606734,0.0001501214,0.00033384023,0.00051860634,0.0010858891,0.00019542279,0.00038481204,0.0003568644,0.0000693613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078253135,0.00013710141,0.000057985315,0.0013458576,0.004202806,0.0006458404,0.00015097341,0.0031580701,0.000040769104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004583002,0.000045699253,0.00023431501,0.00021322614,0.000008282584,0.000010815786,0.7236088,1.8387277e-7,0.000053899865,0.27296188,0.0002309079,0.0025861477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000485951,0.00019056979,0.0018653134,0.00017137377,0.0000021969968,7.281283e-7,0.71097046,0.000035853933,0.00008317898,0.2778941,0.008136577,0.00016369142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022797806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025401315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51425946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004850088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109319812","doi":"10.1177/1468794105048658","title":"Fear of offending: disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Psychology; Content analysis; Focus group; Constructivist grounded theory; Social psychology; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Sociology; Grounded theory; Social science","score_opus":0.7134932883470805,"score_gpt":0.7306789638120522,"score_spread":0.01718567546497174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109319812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7498341,0.0017657569,0.022384932,0.061335113,0.00007642403,0.0016314292,0.00011397586,0.000080464786,0.16277781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96447414,0.00041850124,0.029388702,0.000030474723,0.00018722215,0.00007331724,0.000015055041,0.000027318414,0.0053852587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9296051,0.06295188,0.0007876184,0.00061973743,0.004390725,0.0016449413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97204703,0.02609178,0.00013630903,0.00043784842,0.00087410765,0.00041292736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17231782,0.0001714251,0.00060336024,0.0025682417,0.0010429869,0.00018504103,0.0008557566,0.00019469576,0.0009133908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021637268,0.00015547476,0.00026114224,0.0062541277,0.0049593705,0.0007119047,0.00033098692,0.0021366484,0.0000374222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084332925,0.00019935302,0.005489019,0.00007222505,0.00020879475,0.00000630601,0.65403974,0.000052997875,0.0007736586,0.3248916,0.0004920935,0.0136898905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005282401,0.00015829783,0.004522136,0.00017736151,0.000026758671,1.139637e-7,0.8377546,0.0012230065,0.00087652303,0.13384776,0.020598063,0.00028714444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021167442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017580952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21464007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088145584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094861747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.4244514128753006,"score_gpt":0.6660440278786938,"score_spread":0.24159261500339319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116918702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54499036,0.0007815948,0.016746566,0.0050315643,0.00014905725,0.0005404454,0.0000028554043,0.00010029341,0.43165725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831396,0.00008228755,0.0073124724,0.000035673118,0.00023963279,0.000032335687,0.0000021714768,0.000020173276,0.009135689],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709051,0.025268618,0.00044453662,0.00041001945,0.0016454203,0.0013262886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97920144,0.019745652,0.000067579014,0.00014979829,0.00058185734,0.0002536584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15123793,0.00011637029,0.00024329528,0.00071229215,0.00090616045,0.00008712774,0.00034918266,0.00014580695,0.00036231815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016038543,0.000111338675,0.00007337406,0.0025593662,0.0014821951,0.00027212963,0.000094647796,0.0012149259,0.00027146793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005169028,0.00005306108,0.0012521107,0.000008259426,0.000005830789,0.000018851595,0.48840457,9.62598e-7,0.00029812564,0.45889473,0.00021899595,0.050792813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032957667,0.00026163727,0.00527251,0.000034710825,8.8833366e-7,2.0635397e-7,0.7708715,0.00000937456,0.0003791419,0.16391627,0.058765646,0.00015851833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011951803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012717333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43814918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004895473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002521773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119068251","doi":"10.1177/1468794114548945","title":"Five stories of accidental ethnography: turning unplanned moments in the field into data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; National Council for Eurasian and East European Research; Russell Sage Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Ethnography; Accidental; Notice; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Politics; Everyday life; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology; History; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3221945454977697,"score_gpt":0.6206663579474165,"score_spread":0.2984718124496468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119068251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256388,0.0003971205,0.00012601752,0.023019794,0.00011591822,0.00048424597,0.000038384747,0.000021756969,0.050157946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991994,0.00002326573,0.0002493019,0.00013079381,0.00013928527,0.00003453193,0.000011058486,0.0000057303187,0.00020666329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893795,0.008240986,0.00023672261,0.00025672678,0.0013782645,0.0005077564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806087,0.018635906,0.000055090477,0.00036388487,0.00026149346,0.00007494283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017512552,0.00007871204,0.00019021715,0.00015607847,0.00069077633,0.000059379297,0.0011557902,0.000075802025,0.000051619183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02090495,0.000057701847,0.00004047291,0.0009405805,0.0017218649,0.00021213295,0.00038123125,0.00047829907,0.000028710745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028690274,0.000042278672,0.016538685,0.000017124761,0.000025259877,0.0000010950807,0.8726038,1.297685e-7,0.000008885616,0.10731282,0.0021896143,0.00123162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016744326,0.000119153934,0.006102351,0.000039559785,0.0000028843892,3.503806e-8,0.92226565,0.000008813023,0.000035008834,0.06654261,0.0046545938,0.0000619233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026950708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008803118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07356055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008915284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088725494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98734236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124352716","doi":"10.1177/1468794114538897","title":"Catching the shimmers of the social: from the limits of reflexivity to methodological creativity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Participatory action research; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Creativity; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9741345824231714,"score_gpt":0.8375044618927163,"score_spread":0.1366301205304551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124352716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9316444,0.00008050211,0.0060435925,0.044461735,0.00008323109,0.0008208459,0.000046455225,0.00001416337,0.01680508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623376,0.000016197018,0.0027124619,0.0002415782,0.00019171089,0.00010209385,6.234907e-7,0.000011675517,0.00048990577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7936855,0.20212688,0.0003740784,0.00032487267,0.002775618,0.00071306765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83306634,0.16500357,0.00019923574,0.0005934719,0.0009548385,0.00018256504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19456351,0.00011741421,0.000382895,0.00006741125,0.0021008938,0.00006331319,0.0018517195,0.00012394364,0.000118037926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19183847,0.000054520107,0.00019129584,0.0017180317,0.0058315927,0.00011359202,0.00056748395,0.0010055803,0.00002261028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016944864,0.000107579006,0.0034962564,0.000015215189,0.00006430344,2.2694907e-7,0.6818372,0.000005477609,0.017635219,0.27732712,0.001599503,0.017742459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002614597,0.00036409404,0.21076651,0.00008981881,0.000023207482,4.9943335e-8,0.5250516,0.00007792287,0.02740145,0.2114469,0.024342485,0.00017451777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024153559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041767037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20727026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018847112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057785184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919826},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2130133015","doi":"10.1177/1468794110380525","title":"Interviews as encounters: issues of sexuality and reflexivity when men interview men about commercial same sex relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Respondent; Human sexuality; Interview; Sexualization; Gender studies; Sociology; Qualitative research; Queer; Conversation; Focus group; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.6093595537735169,"score_gpt":0.7057991561710943,"score_spread":0.09643960239757743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130133015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117822,0.0040716524,0.004203187,0.1632914,0.00034626375,0.0028490804,0.00040630787,0.00015054228,0.5128994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085099,0.0050219335,0.028198184,0.000467406,0.00075133966,0.0003400494,0.000051820392,0.000077624296,0.05658175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92352223,0.0713642,0.00091480534,0.0006639658,0.002557755,0.000977013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721111,0.024293695,0.00027446132,0.0006129774,0.002184398,0.00052337785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16410348,0.00024092483,0.0006991446,0.00041749267,0.0012345361,0.00025615355,0.0008995107,0.00036462827,0.0020661205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03309553,0.0002124217,0.00015158032,0.00086755835,0.008460395,0.0007263173,0.0006039866,0.0025540148,0.00016397594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058018188,0.00016217315,0.00047445277,0.00020579706,0.0000766026,0.0000021081858,0.66257256,4.0656566e-8,0.0018969445,0.29062048,0.012652742,0.03127805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030621517,0.00037490347,0.0018579173,0.00019091819,0.00000964491,7.22063e-7,0.47898698,0.000022209717,0.00052765355,0.3740911,0.14341763,0.00021413376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044907443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015276648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59672767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022709506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008020393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139378737","doi":"10.1177/1468794108093898","title":"Dynamics of the `field': multiple standpoints, narrative and shifting positionality in multisited research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Crafts, Textile, and Design","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Gender studies; Narrative; Subjectivity; CONTEST; Power (physics); Social science; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.36275277847338033,"score_gpt":0.511294056283965,"score_spread":0.14854127781058463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139378737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98341894,0.0002419158,0.00009861582,0.0039212704,0.00005036866,0.000632151,0.00013543281,0.000014766825,0.011486552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966524,0.000047550802,0.00023958976,0.000054813678,0.00007858032,0.00005401985,0.000018185989,0.000015514526,0.0028393273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229175,0.005290669,0.0004049988,0.00033033887,0.0011945493,0.000487691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98460317,0.01362608,0.0000716567,0.00027198563,0.0013486013,0.0000784834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008319243,0.00011929127,0.00024164541,0.0003823596,0.0013471884,0.00007864958,0.00027483355,0.00007282809,0.00044301595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038625132,0.000087674234,0.000060758604,0.00041860537,0.0026851266,0.00021787954,0.00021021474,0.0009204011,0.00001474206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024264569,0.00016271941,0.0025452555,0.00006433481,0.000022537944,0.00001030752,0.7161304,0.0000035613614,0.00025087528,0.27809322,0.0021661534,0.0003080391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013503592,0.00047894046,0.01627322,0.00024395126,0.0000027090498,0.000003527376,0.8980019,0.0035491495,0.00083488243,0.07730217,0.0017432383,0.00021592404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065551987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012667712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20079105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019905929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018457448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139498372","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337880","title":"Preliminary field-work: methodological reflections from northern Canadian research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Field research; Research ethics; Creativity; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8558503893335307,"score_gpt":0.7424642321071072,"score_spread":0.11338615722642353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139498372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5382314,0.0010362291,0.00048489962,0.10883792,0.0005496405,0.002540371,0.00009695807,0.000100250625,0.34812236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980008,0.00023058147,0.0041026133,0.0019864386,0.00084491714,0.0005980227,0.000053819458,0.000026876603,0.0121487435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597181,0.034959078,0.00052643195,0.0005909732,0.00081788923,0.0033875306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545655,0.041600384,0.0000633834,0.00050190685,0.0027504065,0.0005183764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03680858,0.00015942469,0.00040794132,0.0006871747,0.014836652,0.000023051658,0.0005030229,0.0005537906,0.003042336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015512573,0.00013163502,0.00008405855,0.0015923791,0.00035892657,0.00007674794,0.00029884983,0.0044547054,0.0036834497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007943097,0.00018305257,0.0070753843,0.000031486215,0.0000955624,0.00010284589,0.8380708,0.0000031836341,0.00016745648,0.019752776,0.12499733,0.008725775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004094199,0.0033334896,0.049612764,0.00008001732,0.0000065947766,9.1189366e-7,0.7083716,0.000007180429,0.00003612487,0.10632572,0.13160628,0.00020989051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6424314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9001079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4417766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019162731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024545297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143472267","doi":"10.1177/1468794106093636","title":"What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Active listening; Epistemology; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.5654033162008418,"score_gpt":0.6453762317024662,"score_spread":0.07997291550162433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143472267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51130265,0.01050544,0.0004458763,0.4460997,0.00019097309,0.0013516005,0.000025236337,0.00007118419,0.03000737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8962316,0.036158852,0.0041478407,0.00064435834,0.00032033894,0.00018481979,0.000008543632,0.00003904554,0.062264614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9380022,0.0581608,0.00024796478,0.0004720345,0.0021399898,0.0009769633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95497507,0.04239474,0.00008414749,0.00025576173,0.0018462319,0.00044405748],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.092820495,0.0001629263,0.00035650385,0.00025382394,0.0044932887,0.0007563531,0.0003783325,0.0001728916,0.000058383288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041097354,0.0001103262,0.000063600775,0.0012438163,0.020447748,0.0006993753,0.00027139322,0.0012634638,0.000007738365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107590764,0.000014930176,0.00007357752,0.00003663582,0.000038977825,0.000018450417,0.7603143,1.1830219e-7,0.00023019484,0.2310602,0.004958644,0.0031463767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008950117,0.00016000333,0.00025856248,0.00009224739,0.0000037879706,0.0000048140623,0.88039994,0.000056961464,0.00015953726,0.044001874,0.07380788,0.00015938972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01032338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048824977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44545534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016753282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010177188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143692112","doi":"10.1177/1468794115569564","title":"Filtered meaning: appreciating linguistic skill, social position and subjectivity of interpreters in cross-language research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Subjectivity; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Fluency; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6750878281009164,"score_gpt":0.7356350787654956,"score_spread":0.06054725066457922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143692112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92486054,0.0004350206,0.0011093927,0.0023054176,0.00009215807,0.00072284247,0.000052215528,0.00002963078,0.0703928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994651,0.000059027872,0.004306467,0.00001472901,0.0002536848,0.0000773427,0.000009434188,0.000024484063,0.00060381135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9200466,0.07397821,0.0005713723,0.00056453753,0.0035952507,0.0012439842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96197486,0.033259742,0.0001394952,0.0002149316,0.0040267357,0.0003842603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19870628,0.00014900167,0.0004216615,0.0009959801,0.0010732971,0.0002790984,0.00047505292,0.00026154314,0.000041505587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14576362,0.0001494513,0.00007501675,0.0022523683,0.0068795644,0.00037771853,0.00040189474,0.0020935973,0.000015272819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028383086,0.000115073126,0.0016643241,0.00013699598,0.00002224608,0.000016012253,0.8380297,0.0000012567265,0.0018846213,0.1533033,0.00016018847,0.0043824636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006634414,0.00046644692,0.0020916087,0.00021038082,0.0000019845734,4.770972e-7,0.7483991,0.0002113837,0.0011530692,0.24640268,0.0002353656,0.0001640931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021990703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031956972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093099385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095563446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012948631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99582314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163261691","doi":"10.1177/1468794113495038","title":"‘Emergent reconstruction’ in grounded theory: learning from team-based interview research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Sociology; Framing (construction); Constructivist grounded theory; Construct (python library); Solidarity; Premise; Population; Epistemology; Social constructionism; Psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.771834576379648,"score_gpt":0.6983268824887411,"score_spread":0.07350769389090694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163261691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5084612,0.0046066185,0.026352098,0.10444998,0.0009184309,0.006066088,0.00005165551,0.00030790575,0.34878606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96797466,0.001586827,0.015508352,0.00015474074,0.0005906496,0.0013786376,0.00003366882,0.00007271025,0.012699756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.733087,0.25941342,0.0007188732,0.00082796125,0.004024253,0.0019284922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191716,0.07514147,0.00012416313,0.0004898458,0.004441085,0.0006318871],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27112052,0.00023172946,0.0005038282,0.0014886778,0.0023961163,0.00056728796,0.0010634132,0.00036730635,0.0093716495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07085693,0.00021132582,0.00016802123,0.0042363824,0.007603979,0.0007707759,0.0003352217,0.005249842,0.0021743367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010545869,0.00021855679,0.0008955054,0.0000969928,0.00006141321,0.0000052864457,0.4101176,0.000008710307,0.0008314188,0.46353343,0.004362836,0.11976278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034534265,0.00021137639,0.00086384686,0.00025227398,0.0000013975128,1.1485965e-7,0.471761,0.00028385964,0.00013927018,0.5051479,0.020827489,0.0001661538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09442832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008657145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4595135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013881518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018176413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167996025","doi":"10.1177/1468794108093897","title":"Ethics policy as audit in Canadian clinical settings: exiling the ethnographic method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Audit; Meaning (existential); Research ethics; Informed consent; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Process (computing); Social science; Anthropology; Epistemology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.915368868469525,"score_gpt":0.8163960002943483,"score_spread":0.0989728681751767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167996025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35232332,0.0010723076,0.00026639886,0.5742195,0.00017111433,0.0018046991,0.000035132838,0.000066790606,0.070040725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600786,0.006225895,0.010073084,0.0118130045,0.0009448149,0.00019975512,0.000020679418,0.000088558976,0.010555589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454482,0.04177969,0.0019422951,0.0013240211,0.0066015003,0.0029042934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23598613,0.74780226,0.00031253832,0.003048052,0.009031058,0.003819992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30893573,0.00024176294,0.00070146937,0.002002363,0.0013372197,0.00006340843,0.0010465769,0.0015262739,0.0002851122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6063335,0.00017447176,0.0003369819,0.00525264,0.005757873,0.000111561254,0.00043649654,0.031602595,0.00073514815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085325044,0.00064945547,0.049037322,0.00079522206,0.00034360742,0.0016041389,0.3705995,0.000013010039,0.00023375277,0.55796057,0.009628569,0.008281605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036208283,0.0031466964,0.06283016,0.0018002859,0.000028303444,0.0001910253,0.18214592,0.0008069003,0.00040793748,0.65729845,0.0871239,0.00059959415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57333237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4365001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7094621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009106949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033648912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268836053","doi":"10.1177/1468794115622529","title":"Watching the watchers: conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Covert; Secrecy; Ethnography; Law enforcement; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; State police; Symbol (formal); Reflexivity; Legislation; Participant observation; Deception; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.8909101175761514,"score_gpt":0.7009790939748612,"score_spread":0.1899310236012901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268836053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8154265,0.00001005059,0.000018682642,0.17004669,0.000052546726,0.00045373052,0.0000072850403,0.00002230959,0.013962173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729985,0.0001575182,0.00004198241,0.0008686742,0.00036273903,0.00011832248,0.0000041287226,0.000013650759,0.0011331348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9476249,0.048581462,0.00026314263,0.00030627832,0.0022942917,0.0009299004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346415,0.0639852,0.00008117554,0.00041484224,0.0007455742,0.00013173505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09244322,0.000099099525,0.00011430014,0.0007709422,0.0035182494,0.0003377788,0.0008810805,0.00012888043,0.00010968698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009866956,0.000047736023,0.000053798212,0.0048977556,0.003202507,0.0005133083,0.00010531739,0.0016415177,0.00023067559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026900254,0.00003425853,0.0008655502,0.0000058545893,0.000010134314,6.4102386e-7,0.8379268,0.0000043428436,0.0018266547,0.15472364,0.0034325162,0.0011426772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022574652,0.0001312725,0.0037353688,0.00017818241,0.0000023689993,4.3500302e-7,0.9118799,0.000015471085,0.00010104763,0.031245062,0.05239432,0.000090833295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63076717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08874572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54202145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032103836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003947703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299219954","doi":"10.1177/1468794116630040","title":"Arts-based health research and academic legitimacy: transcending hegemonic conventions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Hospital for Sick Children; University of British Columbia; University Health Network; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Openness to experience; The arts; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.7458826426879663,"score_gpt":0.7055587668032544,"score_spread":0.04032387588471198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299219954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550035,0.0031451269,0.004015557,0.23238881,0.00012478605,0.0014421323,0.00004351777,0.0000695926,0.0037669858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933059,0.0010523404,0.00058010616,0.00041746348,0.00021022501,0.00021592312,0.00003108168,0.000025607304,0.0041613462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936907,0.0028675015,0.0004095115,0.00046352626,0.0015995151,0.0009692123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915572,0.0064701727,0.000049015907,0.00025070334,0.00086721167,0.0008057061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02266851,0.000111864145,0.00029881208,0.00070232037,0.0005338699,0.000022087017,0.000121929144,0.00014183957,0.00036809186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043873885,0.000076178636,0.00006005257,0.0008856161,0.0017617015,0.0001445552,0.00003716527,0.0014352798,0.00021843854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016570066,0.001777248,0.0033919006,0.003025534,0.00018158571,0.000061271065,0.48242027,1.5845615e-7,0.044552594,0.1704259,0.04885938,0.24364714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014546641,0.011259663,0.028462563,0.012737005,0.000036393634,0.00006984242,0.70403075,0.00019854953,0.026219962,0.1170305,0.08479427,0.0006138512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016244849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020598603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24303329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049170095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002032806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7856499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310008377","doi":"10.1177/1468794115626244","title":"Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Investment (military); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Peer group; Public relations; Social psychology; Process (computing); Applied psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.9050232879490918,"score_gpt":0.7786427984073505,"score_spread":0.1263804895417413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310008377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723247,0.0007341985,0.0009582631,0.0074133324,0.000499349,0.006083057,0.00033481698,0.00009627121,0.011555988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96441627,0.00008666397,0.00039508045,0.00042624393,0.0002841286,0.002997578,0.00006779823,0.0000767453,0.031249505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.83616275,0.15398215,0.0015310851,0.0010441169,0.004516939,0.0027629575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236349,0.06938384,0.00026594102,0.00084073504,0.004967032,0.0009075906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19485115,0.0003426962,0.00060066406,0.0010853647,0.0056243315,0.000055039436,0.0006723442,0.00022012657,0.001652994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009806486,0.00022673473,0.00010488009,0.0017148462,0.00076642615,0.00049617677,0.0009946757,0.0040243543,0.0035723303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032922227,0.00095829635,0.0028641715,0.0009292876,0.000088431625,0.00030209703,0.91164094,3.3682138e-8,0.0005606145,0.0034145233,0.06991138,0.009001014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002651145,0.0028645203,0.0000438445,0.0016391955,0.0000062786085,0.0000065620575,0.9578714,0.000010895976,0.00012450712,0.0066353367,0.027875828,0.00027048844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018507749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023153676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18504466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021667427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009292932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315425008","doi":"10.1177/1468794111399841","title":"Carrying my family with me: artifacts as emic perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Emic and etic; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.941550614149252,"score_gpt":0.791870571483774,"score_spread":0.14968004266547796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315425008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7104802,0.0005119515,0.00067029794,0.00057899737,0.000035965117,0.0005814744,0.0000054489706,0.00008371579,0.28705195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882404,0.000143398,0.0049802167,0.000044240063,0.00012690024,0.00023938996,0.0000010655133,0.000035889298,0.006188482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.970006,0.024329621,0.0002734815,0.00062749,0.0031357254,0.0016276729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911642,0.005690564,0.00007623809,0.000405455,0.0018950643,0.00076849636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0375838,0.00017743865,0.00029737226,0.00047618704,0.0014683254,0.00015559829,0.00069539394,0.0001298086,0.0011550498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01745057,0.00014783669,0.00007553322,0.0018128812,0.0044534695,0.00060044456,0.00017354713,0.0009757146,0.0011450744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554918,0.00014374836,0.0008299449,0.000017032016,0.00006106063,0.000042980824,0.79692364,3.3003553e-7,0.0047193365,0.19459571,0.00037040928,0.002040325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029814732,0.00070230017,0.0040394627,0.000062887695,0.000006221887,6.7667077e-7,0.95263976,0.0000126846535,0.0047441465,0.032115385,0.005158753,0.00021957062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01574013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010884433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28086346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006602305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002104583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318578413","doi":"10.1177/14687941110110020606","title":"Book review: MICHAEL PICKERING (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008. 240 pp (including index). ISBN 9780748625772 (hbk) US$110.00; ISBN 9780748625789 (pbk) US$36.00","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Index (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.561025670769544,"score_gpt":0.5839376888406713,"score_spread":0.022912018071127305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318578413","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004941093,0.85373175,0.0014763718,0.045895375,0.0020782414,0.011158316,0.00024707866,0.00045764243,0.08001415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016597703,0.3957235,0.009749217,0.0011187057,0.0016604902,0.0006573028,0.00007356019,0.00010334743,0.5892541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801619,0.010238237,0.0012084014,0.0016477555,0.0034782162,0.0032654642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98275983,0.007441309,0.000428368,0.0007799747,0.0076029436,0.0009875797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04562535,0.0006535484,0.0012961002,0.0005383597,0.0059076254,0.00032980397,0.002131888,0.0005879074,0.0046518436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013208697,0.00056550914,0.00045164715,0.0029593161,0.0044214,0.0017819296,0.0019148173,0.0025851491,0.00006569169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003391832,0.00015467289,0.00018510204,0.00035921627,0.0003646937,0.000030531763,0.10979279,0.000001386936,0.00019089728,0.0021798646,0.8828212,0.003580444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007100222,0.00032650016,0.00011245599,0.0012786314,0.000040256567,0.000002798492,0.19982235,0.000050037437,0.0007817661,0.0010904449,0.7951713,0.0006134052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016920129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056562055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003032244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014947859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392284092","doi":"10.1177/1468794115619002","title":"Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Queer; Participatory action research; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Narrative; Citizen journalism; Politics; Action research; Gender studies; Knowledge production; Unpacking; Feminism; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.8154885795801954,"score_gpt":0.7488891148639437,"score_spread":0.06659946471625167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392284092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54551643,0.0043240297,0.016140549,0.11493661,0.0006084171,0.0016368768,0.000025368294,0.00010250616,0.31670922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753222,0.0002674999,0.008046476,0.000049587466,0.00055174663,0.00014527202,0.000004105528,0.000019640545,0.0155934775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91691536,0.07866738,0.000411626,0.00032987827,0.0028328686,0.0008428629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97596246,0.016105574,0.00011469061,0.00037404176,0.0070343805,0.0004088279],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23902053,0.000094558585,0.000204459,0.0002709305,0.0013060304,0.00028426803,0.0005630936,0.00015951718,0.00010101835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12902695,0.000069534464,0.000069564325,0.0018091998,0.0053568007,0.0009276061,0.00010862702,0.0013276107,0.0001946784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051488692,0.00006928646,0.00026672956,0.000031656647,0.000022353148,7.501761e-7,0.6275839,0.000002877321,0.00081616757,0.35719255,0.008055472,0.0059067816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017330312,0.0002158546,0.00050988107,0.000053606647,0.000004097148,2.3694197e-7,0.68039435,0.00003422867,0.0025151158,0.19504055,0.1209698,0.00008897176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096503965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4298058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058637484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002681965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422566680","doi":"10.1177/1468794116652451","title":"Researching resilience: lessons learned from working with rural, Sesotho-speaking South African young people","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Inclusion (mineral); Psychological resilience; Sociology; Qualitative research; Poverty; Gender studies; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.40133043441474625,"score_gpt":0.5923547926670147,"score_spread":0.1910243582522685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422566680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201735,0.00037799616,0.0030149398,0.009294929,0.00015769183,0.00071321987,0.000106816624,0.00010582469,0.06605506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867457,0.000115228475,0.00089893414,0.000047826125,0.00025239878,0.0002563794,0.000019440176,0.00007044346,0.011593612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871379,0.007055607,0.0005004666,0.0010809739,0.0021708594,0.0020541977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99173665,0.00621513,0.00018658958,0.0009581546,0.00038675754,0.00051669485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009237006,0.00028428712,0.00044473348,0.00062745716,0.0011138029,0.0001842697,0.0008982322,0.0001557254,0.0011563353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011401278,0.00018000991,0.000090583446,0.0017860758,0.0011464594,0.00037715156,0.00031764738,0.00112426,0.0014273267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022091388,0.00024218237,0.044570595,0.00004111624,0.00011665808,0.00009131768,0.74828887,0.0000030486883,0.007902813,0.031765178,0.0016036627,0.16316544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001774488,0.001057463,0.07733215,0.0010124008,0.000009221683,0.0000137030775,0.90390706,0.000013905167,0.0010386207,0.010828681,0.0025847347,0.0004275642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014715802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004445436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16273788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000514159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046176984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532883782","doi":"10.1177/1468794116672914","title":"(Re)Grounding grounded theory: a close reading of theory in four schools","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Grounded theory; Focus group; Epistemology; Coding (social sciences); Phenomenon; Sociology; Axial coding; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Process theory; Theoretical sampling; Social science","score_opus":0.5036375311519631,"score_gpt":0.6665039151524628,"score_spread":0.1628663840004997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532883782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50903577,0.0007183265,0.1709741,0.030763915,0.00011391308,0.0028298963,0.00013256755,0.000121769976,0.2853097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98393124,0.0004421654,0.007192117,0.00002921599,0.00013322232,0.00037723815,0.0000017454997,0.000027941289,0.007865093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9223353,0.0733347,0.0006010445,0.0005584247,0.0019879558,0.0011825343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307408,0.06738914,0.00015641408,0.00037219803,0.0010303564,0.00031114108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16505231,0.00015342112,0.00038450965,0.00082645635,0.00078413833,0.00010148665,0.00070817943,0.0001495997,0.00064267643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053694442,0.00010994345,0.00012409079,0.002378989,0.0028258665,0.0005682777,0.00019116778,0.00065766263,0.00018615516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556567,0.000079885715,0.00034894948,0.000031039843,0.00003152373,0.0000037555146,0.13330877,3.5138722e-8,0.006834176,0.7957312,0.00024655304,0.06322844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352138,0.00009038766,0.0008071084,0.00020721178,0.0000019479423,9.6055764e-8,0.3695011,0.0000013593708,0.0007750971,0.6252517,0.002908797,0.00010301052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020745702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008971817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47489548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073527195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007527224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551741184","doi":"10.1177/1468794116638829","title":"Alison I Griffith and Dorothy E Smith (eds), <i>Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-Line Work</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Front line; Ethnography; Sociology; Front (military); Work (physics); Media studies; Gender studies; Anthropology; Political science; Geography; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.24157522323281455,"score_gpt":0.49662823090016883,"score_spread":0.2550530076673543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551741184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7102729,0.009265864,0.026566563,0.12860443,0.0004697268,0.0020414027,0.00024037856,0.00017068523,0.12236801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97280985,0.0039312122,0.001578487,0.00021752492,0.00018465123,0.00004684629,0.0000071228883,0.000013025009,0.021211259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964887,0.0012433145,0.00022776434,0.00028207185,0.0011206272,0.0006375337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828315,0.0008470996,0.000071780196,0.0001681507,0.00040237606,0.00022746087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052622785,0.00010311202,0.0001643356,0.00072266744,0.0008962306,0.00009737336,0.00027478556,0.00007289107,0.0003223674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037071263,0.00006947397,0.00004769868,0.001655101,0.0017720478,0.00047394694,0.00019187045,0.00015159366,0.000009462548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031049352,0.00007003145,0.000656335,0.000014274101,0.00008834788,0.0000016973614,0.057517085,5.223658e-7,0.00009080431,0.89218473,0.0029634617,0.04638167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024128845,0.00026293218,0.02837983,0.0005741481,0.000021058622,2.4818758e-7,0.31452167,0.000002329048,0.00029343492,0.14294809,0.51019454,0.00038883698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028130643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019917525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74923664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008819226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023867318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68931717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560223254","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679726","title":"Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Freedom of information; Qualitative property; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6820203904628809,"score_gpt":0.7045284147875014,"score_spread":0.022508024324620513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560223254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851996,0.00004739874,0.0008307718,0.009515636,0.000018309825,0.00070081215,0.00034059194,0.000003879949,0.0033430294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977804,0.00010161283,0.0018484803,0.000015540367,0.000039759812,0.00009099905,0.000009558651,0.000003367871,0.00011028791],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96668094,0.029714704,0.0007606745,0.0002512675,0.0019971551,0.00059528305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95149565,0.046898738,0.00019126062,0.0001648092,0.0012054488,0.00004411913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1450395,0.000073390205,0.00028953992,0.000935083,0.0007172374,0.00015718721,0.0005736692,0.00006688818,0.000024444436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031939726,0.00004501795,0.00005096616,0.002146869,0.006568678,0.0016872701,0.00016148826,0.00023854552,0.000002926997],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080673686,0.000060258575,0.0013155144,0.000054615535,0.0000061432625,1.3791559e-7,0.5645677,2.578878e-7,0.0008938651,0.42997494,0.00058181427,0.0024640807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004056985,0.0002758604,0.018432487,0.00017210186,0.0000013713236,3.25176e-8,0.8239197,0.000033362496,0.00012993741,0.15496312,0.0015917411,0.00007453976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024588604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013699206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010886493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041173608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562473293","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679873","title":"Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":580,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Theoretical sampling; Qualitative research; Management science; Process (computing); Conceptual framework; Saturation (graph theory); Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.9120043105781258,"score_gpt":0.7689833316555257,"score_spread":0.14302097892260013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562473293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021596,0.0039752848,0.05290248,0.11473572,0.0002106839,0.0052426797,0.00027511406,0.00010400112,0.12039446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621523,0.0006193493,0.011558271,0.000019955014,0.00028677552,0.00033799052,0.0000057447837,0.000034526733,0.0009221748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8306178,0.16183738,0.00096784404,0.0007842588,0.004158486,0.0016342616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90755004,0.08772953,0.0002463558,0.00059155,0.0036080056,0.0002745115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19294581,0.00019873586,0.00046119982,0.0009294079,0.002466854,0.00017739515,0.0010086506,0.00022091836,0.00029647083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04918524,0.00012447606,0.00012166987,0.0032268825,0.012413193,0.00080171064,0.00033685713,0.0014678489,0.000053060252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007038257,0.00009586899,0.000026271817,0.000027679474,0.000019067515,0.0000019941015,0.5099327,4.8681693e-7,0.01755139,0.45885605,0.00027848783,0.013139614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041283178,0.00017360659,0.0002171654,0.0004195785,0.00000252119,2.2713452e-7,0.7089483,0.000050874398,0.0014682254,0.28353342,0.004630671,0.000142575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012045566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004669022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28405565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010974336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013842528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576190658","doi":"10.1177/1468794116682823","title":"A sociogram is worth a thousand words: proposing a method for the visual analysis of narrative data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Narrative; Computer science; Visualization; Data science; Narrative network; Data visualization; Qualitative property; Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Social network analysis; Graph; Narrative structure; Narrative criticism; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Social media; Theoretical computer science; Machine learning; Linguistics","score_opus":0.9278203283948669,"score_gpt":0.8422690525012019,"score_spread":0.08555127589366507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576190658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31670374,0.0020958143,0.6204095,0.04040149,0.0002488458,0.007940158,0.0011386058,0.00009852933,0.01096334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369823,0.00019212315,0.05948061,0.00007571125,0.00022915285,0.00062059157,0.000019704134,0.000031544856,0.0023682925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676682,0.027010271,0.0004971208,0.00075840944,0.0028786242,0.0011873838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557113,0.03984913,0.00039470426,0.0016516213,0.0020903116,0.00030291945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13849072,0.00016362658,0.0006038181,0.00061677885,0.0066229603,0.00069164496,0.0030957845,0.00013825858,0.0002457038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068774104,0.00011401066,0.00028016884,0.0023807066,0.0045088273,0.0006950603,0.0010066715,0.00063573435,0.000008640885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035627457,0.0002200793,0.0018094566,0.000049867143,0.0024792776,0.0000023195703,0.91496754,0.000004638382,0.00070852507,0.020013485,0.0022563997,0.057132166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057050167,0.00044289333,0.004202643,0.00007184483,0.00045708191,6.773866e-8,0.9157537,0.039508782,0.0011013919,0.014780924,0.022874186,0.00023595899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0156082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008009041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62027854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022086017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016248588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739530871","doi":"10.1177/1468794117722193","title":"The iSquare protocol: combining research, art, and pedagogy through the draw-and-write technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5274670924540499,"score_gpt":0.6141890882393464,"score_spread":0.08672199578529649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739530871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016937757,0.00071465573,0.00003107035,0.059392992,0.00011674213,0.058376174,0.00006852081,0.00009343594,0.86426866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7834122,0.00024820777,0.00015341639,0.0001539566,0.00065606355,0.09502228,0.0000067382666,0.00005468473,0.120292455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945079,0.0032353015,0.00027491534,0.00035699495,0.00091112085,0.00071376935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994829,0.003390214,0.000099726974,0.00069576624,0.00089170126,0.000093568844],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011964542,0.00015542342,0.00019358449,0.000056564117,0.013973506,0.0027315961,0.000747464,0.00006744267,0.00040398972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013053025,0.00007431158,0.000049795148,0.0000556706,0.0074849143,0.0005117479,0.0006728183,0.0012400094,0.00010482929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006672438,0.000022130824,0.000013337248,0.000076116936,0.000019800056,0.0000050925355,0.28262368,1.1663884e-8,0.0001055702,0.69177556,0.021715604,0.0035763553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021880164,0.00029626428,0.00015431974,0.0000995726,0.000001461112,0.0000024025935,0.2769826,0.000007159605,0.00008257761,0.09940172,0.62266713,0.0000859996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025226767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038999922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037078844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009799773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751044040","doi":"10.1177/1468794117728410","title":"What role does the ‘parent-effect’ play in child centered research? The case of photo-interviews of children’s home reading practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Literacy; Narrative; Data collection; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.3867861900969759,"score_gpt":0.6157872331062011,"score_spread":0.2290010430092252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751044040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789788,0.000771409,0.0000019402287,0.011098298,0.0001707856,0.0016315982,0.000047592814,0.0000070172396,0.0072925533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979591,0.0011817797,0.000010386081,0.000012311546,0.00018267248,0.00016434083,0.000008062315,0.000013262656,0.00046811273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739843,0.022990279,0.0005321072,0.00037996768,0.0013962834,0.00071708165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861834,0.011455415,0.000697109,0.00088232296,0.0006707996,0.00011093246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05061014,0.00013152784,0.00032532716,0.00028624161,0.0031948383,0.00068312546,0.0013067927,0.000097500495,0.00024362041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011246388,0.000060948245,0.00011597306,0.000526911,0.0033196125,0.0011475328,0.00036386907,0.00093503005,0.000025525309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033207025,0.00027504563,0.012691164,0.00007153642,0.00010501097,0.000031897667,0.9305368,0.000002458212,0.00046560707,0.04535422,0.00053570914,0.009598458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001294643,0.0007372021,0.06329807,0.0013406163,0.000028623237,0.000019446816,0.8918406,0.00013528384,0.011986051,0.02524115,0.0038234,0.0002549642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12268754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110436425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050606903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013805009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017817477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751556990","doi":"10.1177/1468794117728411","title":"Advancing rigour in solicited diary research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Qualitative research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Research design; Psychology; Management science; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7994687555827503,"score_gpt":0.7960433844838966,"score_spread":0.003425371098853769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751556990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31022108,0.0010550476,0.0021200797,0.13507076,0.00031488776,0.0021251966,0.000049921506,0.00009718752,0.54894584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710155,0.0019205675,0.008531068,0.00007942682,0.00061897543,0.0003368967,0.000006251862,0.00005218911,0.017439129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8365614,0.15135485,0.00066366297,0.0009501801,0.006780491,0.0036894567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92780054,0.065802075,0.00015456235,0.0011951971,0.004255522,0.00079212536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43243453,0.00019269533,0.00046293868,0.0021667348,0.0094414335,0.0010434086,0.0023324436,0.00036465525,0.0004639533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24719816,0.00018360816,0.0001209952,0.0025229298,0.013255478,0.0012163634,0.0009062688,0.004626558,0.0006431636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097507495,0.00014711411,0.0016253979,0.00007079071,0.000019052233,0.000067027504,0.42444062,0.0000011630872,0.00090707705,0.552248,0.004451262,0.015924979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000438516,0.00017324318,0.004346768,0.00022623099,9.079817e-7,2.6330966e-7,0.44183207,0.000093000985,0.00028839632,0.47993478,0.07245715,0.00020869508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059789706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025504092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66079444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011563809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002425002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757742546","doi":"10.1177/1468794117731510","title":"Using internet data sources to achieve qualitative interviewing purposes: a research note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"School for Public Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; The Internet; Social media; Qualitative property; Face (sociological concept); Internet research; Psychology; Medical education; Semi-structured interview; Applied psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.948765234674034,"score_gpt":0.8017038590496283,"score_spread":0.1470613756244057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757742546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5913018,0.0025909608,0.14795415,0.05837028,0.0014416813,0.005589183,0.0008915313,0.00025378837,0.19160661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86629105,0.00017584903,0.11331229,0.00018923836,0.0012185958,0.00025211874,0.000049493683,0.00012269628,0.018388646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88308376,0.10691466,0.00097083976,0.0017699978,0.004757008,0.002503738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95995086,0.031432886,0.00040209334,0.003123739,0.004115022,0.00097539206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26606685,0.00038309785,0.00080531917,0.0012422588,0.007773208,0.0024722381,0.007316285,0.00029217193,0.00048906414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10235959,0.00035020514,0.00017500974,0.0017529621,0.0077338526,0.0021853356,0.0057481527,0.0023780088,0.00085875357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002800671,0.00013889211,0.000058975787,0.00008922015,0.00009898603,0.000020980491,0.8233307,0.0000015784864,0.0010296314,0.14306433,0.005564225,0.026322395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038265536,0.0006555109,0.0001347159,0.000544236,0.000010687923,8.1506784e-7,0.77584255,0.00034380023,0.0004192279,0.09057681,0.1306685,0.0004204899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07400872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019492516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27498925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010383916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011991841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781528524","doi":"10.1177/1468794117743463","title":"Play-making with migrant farm workers in Ontario, Canada: a kinesthetic and embodied approach to qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Qualitative research; Habitus; Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Embodied cognition; Action research; Public relations; Action (physics); Citizenship; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Cultural capital; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8220467114492359,"score_gpt":0.7273129418213309,"score_spread":0.09473376962790503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781528524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9045971,0.00013140225,0.00061298884,0.0031134968,0.000047673213,0.0021081131,0.000015417605,0.000030789186,0.08934299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322785,0.0000062716294,0.011014127,0.000105665495,0.00011312631,0.0008784845,0.000003864104,0.00004672268,0.004603882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93019634,0.05905488,0.000581418,0.0011605299,0.0060173245,0.0029895264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977221,0.018150594,0.000087109736,0.0005302076,0.002943798,0.001067292],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.114080906,0.00028421273,0.0005781412,0.0013232061,0.0020087117,0.0003188031,0.00092171476,0.00017531187,0.00015766693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019235143,0.00024310131,0.00004238758,0.004872493,0.0066280523,0.0002613481,0.0004173798,0.002174078,0.000054775242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009513078,0.00020666175,0.0063812966,0.00004483076,0.00005016386,0.000052249237,0.93027174,0.000007247292,0.00011679424,0.058925588,0.001920122,0.0010719707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007177539,0.0011382132,0.0195727,0.00032693957,0.0000042643346,0.0000017120469,0.93501157,0.00010167299,0.00008039699,0.00901066,0.033660635,0.0003734587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99275345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094845764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004527312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013361213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784091840","doi":"10.1177/1468794117753353","title":"Research in carceral contexts: confronting access barriers and engaging former prisoners","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Prison; Qualitative research; Public relations; Function (biology); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Criminology; Plan (archaeology); Psychology; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3735031249630323,"score_gpt":0.6427627717095051,"score_spread":0.26925964674647285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784091840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451284,0.00037128327,0.00031045757,0.0027785453,0.00008260317,0.00031347945,0.000004098444,0.000019623774,0.05099151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973484,0.000256937,0.00013528757,0.00005415574,0.00027732865,0.000073722505,0.0000018390973,0.000011707747,0.0018405993],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884922,0.008475463,0.00026597586,0.00041590552,0.0013478112,0.0010026634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932496,0.0046706423,0.00004099558,0.00017009172,0.0015742703,0.00029441592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033081893,0.000089099405,0.00020013166,0.0010730948,0.0028453616,0.00049358315,0.00040822662,0.00009180596,0.000373507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051237736,0.00008695945,0.00004308161,0.0026310647,0.00341766,0.00062705984,0.0002368334,0.0009434559,0.000054974797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009094765,0.000025466858,0.006066608,0.0000376842,0.000030027297,0.000008720754,0.9190771,0.0000010420605,0.0001565095,0.01980675,0.0015940815,0.053105034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022112792,0.00011940414,0.0008605828,0.000079358506,0.000007757036,3.441827e-7,0.98270595,0.0002441003,0.00011204745,0.0030186214,0.012522876,0.000107847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12622096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09213276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042103246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006068389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799620040","doi":"10.1177/1468794118769785","title":"Co-constructing the field for a critical ethnography of immigrants’ experiences in a Canadian Francophone minority community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Participant observation; Sociology; Immigration; French; Field (mathematics); Critical ethnography; Gender studies; Construct (python library); Field research; Qualitative research; Anthropology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5221177161698419,"score_gpt":0.6890439702973913,"score_spread":0.16692625412754936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799620040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441429,0.00035314698,0.0016710425,0.024023462,0.00019423976,0.00093036273,0.00008658238,0.000012706726,0.028585587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919025,0.00004370161,0.007289143,0.00018836085,0.00019108703,0.00030654337,0.0000020829227,0.000007448068,0.00006914825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9522062,0.04472418,0.00041266598,0.00023556878,0.0012022587,0.0012191508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8710883,0.12613302,0.000060718703,0.0003104039,0.0020398013,0.00036769977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.119118944,0.0001071419,0.0002894184,0.0005423688,0.00326535,0.00009003185,0.0008330249,0.0002056022,0.00024475763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12375417,0.00008340894,0.000114949326,0.002329534,0.017480478,0.00019522471,0.000058164915,0.001615373,0.000009489906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090831345,0.000053455216,0.0025325483,0.00008815394,0.000014775973,9.746631e-7,0.84349126,1.485357e-8,0.00030433416,0.14737394,0.0012114188,0.004838317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019439978,0.00048611936,0.0008055955,0.00007651764,0.0000011634584,1.4361383e-7,0.8912132,0.000014483589,0.0020159532,0.100398615,0.0047019864,0.000091851405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91352457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89989495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08140884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015451605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019907276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809432046","doi":"10.1177/1468794118781380","title":"Moving between theory and practice within an Indigenous research paradigm","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Paradigm shift; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Reciprocal; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.3238106970331905,"score_gpt":0.6304965313042169,"score_spread":0.3066858342710264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809432046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8094646,0.00051901926,0.00021251736,0.0018536189,0.00016886847,0.0012279877,0.000014519443,0.00005532035,0.18648356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804339,0.0016258239,0.0016686872,0.000049281967,0.0024876143,0.000024818566,0.000014767859,0.000034784196,0.013660366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91959107,0.075584985,0.00037954963,0.00057931495,0.0023187727,0.0015462876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581713,0.03746676,0.00012776234,0.00044584318,0.0031058525,0.00068245525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1977697,0.00013056898,0.00022472104,0.00064772903,0.02508308,0.0003820632,0.0005916974,0.00024295185,0.0001507589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036472394,0.00010879447,0.000025654967,0.0015929029,0.006200856,0.0010501104,0.000015263786,0.0011705678,0.0003990323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008930665,0.00008477263,0.0001345332,0.00002046632,0.000017460421,0.0000028291931,0.5435359,2.6791264e-8,0.0000057018838,0.45533872,0.00006057795,0.0007097239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011253679,0.0007400342,0.00094015134,0.000032770135,0.0000045599863,0.0000018247614,0.61830264,8.554124e-7,0.00012311227,0.24021074,0.13940609,0.00012470319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24418908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3616533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21512799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059817923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020813985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883435672","doi":"10.1177/1468794118788004","title":"Witchcraft and supernatural harm: navigating spiritual ethics in political science research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Harm; Politics; Research ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Work (physics); Spiritual care; Field (mathematics); Bioethics; Epistemology; Political science; Spirituality; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4791582883124163,"score_gpt":0.672744616814401,"score_spread":0.1935863285019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883435672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532829,0.000795981,0.00001932581,0.028431445,0.00014400645,0.00039529888,0.000003962467,0.00002941278,0.016897649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959682,0.0007830864,0.0021953569,0.00024944716,0.00046048284,0.00003784169,0.0000016201695,0.000012862224,0.0002911053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832445,0.008055842,0.00035308136,0.0006696032,0.00515672,0.0025202646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98521775,0.009784162,0.000028680462,0.00022655625,0.0040356116,0.0007072573],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.113768645,0.0001183265,0.00019549568,0.00037221567,0.0042892955,0.0005035707,0.0007156972,0.0002449969,0.00007534551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031373158,0.00010780877,0.00003470073,0.0034569716,0.025275216,0.0005038234,0.0005180403,0.0031738214,0.00015752333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584872,0.000032628468,0.0012397228,0.000017232047,0.000003456242,0.000006018906,0.68124974,1.8826398e-8,0.00071270857,0.31451628,0.0019118044,0.00029454063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024256246,0.0001698177,0.012057566,0.00014629112,5.4468256e-7,0.0000010971938,0.82783216,0.000027944676,0.0008320106,0.15656298,0.0019900664,0.00013695678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1169012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047218283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15795329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012494647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044014645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897285595","doi":"10.1177/1468794118803022","title":"Negotiating with gatekeepers to get interviews with politicians: qualitative research recruitment in a digital media environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Negotiation; Reputation; Politics; Qualitative research; Social media; Sociology; Reputation management; Digital media; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7666971906980924,"score_gpt":0.7040218733260135,"score_spread":0.06267531737207888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897285595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69792986,0.0013030911,0.023745101,0.07052755,0.00021280693,0.012612872,0.00059136,0.0001777611,0.1928996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618958,0.00043443157,0.029725786,0.00029743958,0.0006607042,0.0024117192,0.000046475285,0.0001268062,0.0044008335],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91478914,0.07155998,0.0009226629,0.0014062765,0.00779151,0.0035304136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433587,0.050461378,0.00016910007,0.0007488088,0.003897523,0.0013644621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15476784,0.0004103226,0.0007338764,0.0018124214,0.0019834267,0.0008508288,0.0011848761,0.0002630642,0.00046045033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030979512,0.0003121922,0.000091546885,0.004530128,0.014453624,0.0009825841,0.00056186254,0.0027382562,0.0009996765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064030127,0.00027340252,0.00014384284,0.00005689864,0.00007577143,0.000040108927,0.7562741,0.00000863538,0.00008498495,0.23394018,0.0008693086,0.007592424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080988934,0.003885876,0.0002498132,0.0006732166,0.0000041479393,0.0000011192674,0.8770851,0.00003427707,0.00017088391,0.077465236,0.039199125,0.00042131328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016273893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011618557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26396593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026360801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002028921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915215940","doi":"10.1177/1468794119830076","title":"Participatory training in disability and migration: mobilizing community capacities for advocacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Participatory action research; Transformative learning; Sociology; Oppression; General partnership; Citizen journalism; Training (meteorology); Public relations; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.6324257609704906,"score_gpt":0.6246997909268173,"score_spread":0.007725970043673369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915215940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852274,0.00006433787,0.000035937068,0.0039418424,0.00005706232,0.0010272445,0.000010732334,0.000018178309,0.009617277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877274,0.000017014216,0.00018918177,0.000013037176,0.0000505124,0.00022982336,0.000008892309,0.0000061115543,0.00071268517],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002063,0.008676267,0.00024043843,0.00020597337,0.00046334858,0.0003933386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899255,0.00951196,0.00003395988,0.00019294712,0.00024223326,0.00009338148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020801993,0.000065819164,0.00016802095,0.000065483255,0.00081686693,0.00008785055,0.00014240383,0.0000673413,0.000097659766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024709436,0.000055191158,0.000039028277,0.0002920761,0.004205127,0.0003652537,0.0000424344,0.0003468744,0.000009836192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041700612,0.00009616123,0.01838977,0.00009755842,0.000005836105,9.934737e-8,0.8686133,0.000005113164,0.00015146034,0.11050248,0.000033480595,0.0020630127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025199333,0.00010943383,0.011131979,0.00003141441,0.0000013593555,4.5608058e-8,0.84130853,0.00012294145,0.00007617852,0.1453215,0.0015771982,0.00006741934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025047867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045521338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034819014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020471145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027106944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947458104","doi":"10.1177/1468794119851336","title":"The necessity of a relational ethics alongside Noddings’ ethics of care in narrative inquiry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Ethics of care; Indigenous; Narrative; Sociology; Club; Identity (music); Narrative inquiry; Environmental ethics; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.6814733013135371,"score_gpt":0.6720827856224815,"score_spread":0.009390515691055645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947458104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.941849,0.0012246575,0.00002916741,0.02008212,0.00031111354,0.00030378104,0.000010764795,0.0000092051705,0.03618021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797124,0.00012621029,0.00032570216,0.000036887537,0.00008023344,0.000015685177,0.000004560903,0.000007206043,0.0014323053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839735,0.013220208,0.00036567703,0.00021990057,0.0018582337,0.0003624726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507375,0.046838492,0.00015504581,0.00017426879,0.0020142936,0.00008039629],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033215817,0.00006779237,0.00021709717,0.00017855252,0.00089427386,0.000018303046,0.00035736963,0.00030850596,0.000084104795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028686788,0.000054576387,0.00006261246,0.0009386625,0.0031469606,0.00011674362,0.00006816204,0.002468692,0.000020687312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005874139,0.000028789544,0.0029141004,0.00005990552,0.000008168481,4.2602744e-7,0.67184144,0.000004763997,0.000039987393,0.3246639,0.00022402391,0.00015573282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016907252,0.00020228796,0.0039748964,0.00011613932,0.000001389786,5.6530443e-8,0.965607,0.0000032373537,0.000058588823,0.020607393,0.009200143,0.000059836246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012281121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017557753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3040565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041455904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036042263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947676566","doi":"10.1177/1468794119851330","title":"Discovering dimensions of research ethics in doing oral history: going public in the case of the Ghent orphanages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Oral history; Situational ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Public history; Sociology; Politics; Research ethics; Comparative historical research; Social science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Media studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5247920455599239,"score_gpt":0.6137663961846743,"score_spread":0.08897435062475045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947676566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775992,0.00041674348,0.00002317145,0.0074179284,0.00005151063,0.00045297542,0.0000144407795,0.0000033473077,0.014020675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874085,0.00020135689,0.00016256979,0.000023345012,0.00001979397,0.000023201475,0.000002306863,0.000007650198,0.0008189265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664184,0.030349603,0.00039251667,0.0002815169,0.0019211877,0.00063676503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97719103,0.021728517,0.00010499717,0.00049065275,0.0004263873,0.000058406084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.089978024,0.0000707637,0.00023063722,0.00068640785,0.0005649934,0.000073373645,0.00091960374,0.000065304426,0.000091193106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011645477,0.000039959516,0.00008376359,0.0027456754,0.0018065639,0.00035650967,0.00059650844,0.0016526101,0.000013052588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011857831,0.00011144972,0.009278783,0.00009668646,0.00001527724,0.000034500226,0.6925389,0.000036029207,0.0010850859,0.29511634,0.0003540224,0.0013210751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019746672,0.00006327434,0.002837051,0.00039801214,0.0000029563694,0.0000011778366,0.97557825,0.00040360633,0.00007562979,0.008007106,0.012357445,0.00007801332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07117649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1279936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28710923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047022733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009172365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99667984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951865297","doi":"10.1177/1468794119847578","title":"Toward a transnational feminist methodology of encounter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situated; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Gender studies; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8185853627063606,"score_gpt":0.7295018813106071,"score_spread":0.0890834813957535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951865297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27193657,0.0005737393,0.04448837,0.095910735,0.000483813,0.0019510232,0.00022789031,0.00006999827,0.58435786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454298,0.00009409318,0.04676279,0.0001169722,0.0000976652,0.000065932756,0.0000081649405,0.000017575378,0.0074069886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9289784,0.066299245,0.0004746368,0.0004135931,0.003007389,0.00082675694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94198537,0.055321116,0.000096307194,0.00022868821,0.002157972,0.00021053861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13933758,0.00011106635,0.00038532526,0.00046300015,0.0003578179,0.000053054937,0.0005964005,0.00022018132,0.0030087812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015026708,0.00009943459,0.00014799098,0.0012115922,0.00432955,0.00019733793,0.0000906009,0.00094845134,0.00020296269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081435304,0.00005189644,0.00015241238,0.00009108331,0.000033256514,0.0000014021585,0.39507273,6.244873e-7,0.001948793,0.60111487,0.00027668162,0.0011748198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032202608,0.0003315565,0.00029568508,0.000027557226,0.0000024111662,3.7657267e-7,0.52482396,0.000017241366,0.0008236235,0.4099001,0.063344784,0.00011068555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014168104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026823187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67349327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020918866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014032318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980954613","doi":"10.1177/1468794119880746","title":"Situating the life story narratives of aging immigrants within a structural context: the intersectional life course perspective as research praxis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life course approach; Photovoice; Operationalization; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Everyday life; Immigration; Praxis; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7032767612204109,"score_gpt":0.7400981043034065,"score_spread":0.03682134308299556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980954613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953315,0.0020865158,0.00006907427,0.030896327,0.00026886174,0.0019824007,0.000028492175,0.00003343198,0.011319879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540615,0.000026397658,0.0002446198,0.00016583058,0.00035045034,0.00026273972,0.0000017073322,0.000032675583,0.003509439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88846964,0.102667354,0.0005547139,0.00066687923,0.0062180515,0.0014233905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9331132,0.057248767,0.00034356842,0.0007677849,0.007857545,0.000669128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14701056,0.00021805386,0.0004317566,0.00045612853,0.004250666,0.00028906655,0.0015507997,0.00014775908,0.0009401094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10794235,0.00013588986,0.0001799258,0.002543472,0.011075927,0.0006018871,0.00053325034,0.0035673266,0.00030421113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002777275,0.00006226753,0.0012781997,0.000030940573,0.00022590389,0.0000027977665,0.72913027,0.000016412607,0.00199057,0.2654329,0.0010971697,0.00045485437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004215131,0.0006121838,0.0050393613,0.0001391754,0.0000074633294,8.054122e-7,0.9560202,0.00034515647,0.0006092619,0.035456255,0.0011974729,0.00015117893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028064214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009023873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22997665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078625075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069512352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988730351","doi":"10.1177/1468794119885040","title":"Where’s the database in digital ethnography? Exploring database ethnography for open data research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Sociology; Ethnography; Data science; Key (lock); Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.7969043138591074,"score_gpt":0.6418251739474456,"score_spread":0.15507913991166178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988730351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066699,0.010135994,0.0064570406,0.06585782,0.00065341895,0.024643954,0.013496749,0.00024033156,0.07184477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227667,0.0009859446,0.00073216174,0.00007657715,0.00020899411,0.0016308671,0.0016130174,0.000037895352,0.0024378705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98388326,0.010020399,0.0005728982,0.0012515169,0.0028667187,0.0014051783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96801245,0.027107965,0.00009012282,0.002800619,0.0017012121,0.00028763743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11512353,0.00017529906,0.00034538205,0.0012569483,0.002456472,0.0014551441,0.0063407244,0.00011173228,0.0006105108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012529177,0.00014099687,0.00012249642,0.006667284,0.0028887754,0.0039143995,0.002784924,0.0015278395,0.00034228998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006053301,0.0011037277,0.01538881,0.00054361654,0.0002592939,0.000010187921,0.67024624,0.000020353797,0.00024390781,0.24382734,0.033400044,0.034351155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007158181,0.00016792638,0.00037181578,0.00027977506,0.000008919176,6.486968e-8,0.8118181,0.0007405639,0.000051944717,0.0179224,0.16766927,0.00025340213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07609472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14119937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22590496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020765972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012014678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006688485","doi":"10.1177/1468794120906012","title":"Working the aporia: ethnography, embodiment and the ethnographic self","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Scholarship; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6843093927139514,"score_gpt":0.6624807157343372,"score_spread":0.021828676979614214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006688485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036883324,0.010104881,0.0029445896,0.8698791,0.0002568352,0.0027354206,0.000011551426,0.00018719761,0.0769971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852966,0.006418206,0.0043616774,0.002213036,0.0007076721,0.00039646297,0.0000025282875,0.000033031574,0.0005708062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89600235,0.09841564,0.00043385496,0.00054382713,0.0034430767,0.0011612566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93742144,0.060694646,0.000112070265,0.00034507414,0.0009623135,0.00046448005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15518507,0.00017756918,0.00033299258,0.0002009666,0.0049193497,0.0004957164,0.0009996195,0.00018023611,0.000098800476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018836062,0.000095216936,0.00019371934,0.003690696,0.01641044,0.00018317302,0.000423849,0.0027352453,0.000056559686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097351396,0.000017554863,0.000104715735,0.00002099244,0.00008163952,0.0000019153351,0.52544254,3.3930516e-7,0.000018729042,0.4687948,0.0019811315,0.0034383328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000606771,0.00012549025,0.00011556931,0.00003466962,0.000011072124,1.6682817e-7,0.6363654,0.00009582042,0.00001961578,0.22135167,0.14115758,0.00011612897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029036843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061608164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94841325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072994095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004648553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017333755","doi":"10.1177/1468794120909038","title":"Key considerations when interviewing individuals with expressive language difficulties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Key (lock); Intellectual disability; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.3862540945960357,"score_gpt":0.56094389991188,"score_spread":0.17468980531584427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017333755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76471364,0.0005889134,0.0014087404,0.14776726,0.00006130358,0.0014089334,0.000095677635,0.00016611024,0.08378939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504346,0.000018932393,0.0024416144,0.00026174448,0.00016851864,0.00008411998,0.000018381874,0.0000102121885,0.0019530478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932823,0.0048440476,0.00019997521,0.00029342173,0.0010384182,0.0003418349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960417,0.003079981,0.000056284847,0.000129568,0.0004921409,0.00020028625],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029044482,0.00008466669,0.00016148997,0.000074076735,0.00089815725,0.00031364523,0.00018633244,0.00005393964,0.0013049354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032901801,0.000056584926,0.000042977736,0.0003214632,0.0017100263,0.00040529348,0.00008396442,0.00028430342,0.0001303153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012791291,0.00004469836,0.00032884232,0.000025341615,0.00003534078,0.0000058921364,0.8715464,0.0000053550675,0.0003662698,0.11990801,0.0073248697,0.0003961855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028083386,0.00013154841,0.00042934116,0.000051729236,0.0000060461894,2.402652e-7,0.9622918,0.00001361781,0.0008455144,0.02709849,0.008740471,0.00011036106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026541178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013737329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23032977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000677618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022513822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037148320","doi":"10.1177/1468794120934398","title":"Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: a comparative case-study approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Photovoice; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Focus group; Participatory action research; Sociology; Work (physics); Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Climate change; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.9649627906532334,"score_gpt":0.7976799185037576,"score_spread":0.1672828721494758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037148320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9075865,0.00061603484,0.00048587954,0.0012285128,0.000050114442,0.0040381597,0.00003167386,0.00008942434,0.085873656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941917,0.0004079472,0.0031038888,0.0000629124,0.0001942291,0.0015605333,0.0000023562798,0.000019695446,0.00045670217],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665727,0.029092664,0.00037092523,0.00070412864,0.0020508827,0.0012087184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964743,0.0018390001,0.000070866416,0.00023069991,0.00055920007,0.0008259023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027860705,0.00017490418,0.00036261353,0.00026134684,0.0016854766,0.00013504877,0.00039936294,0.000067212444,0.00026442163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460479,0.00016386682,0.00005464025,0.0021519251,0.0011432962,0.00038019216,0.00055849436,0.0006318471,0.00018531248],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011964755,0.00044186597,0.0033626324,0.00015153854,0.00009946344,0.00046553387,0.9664918,4.8092136e-7,0.000049050876,0.025367333,0.0010554978,0.0023951167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004932045,0.00066767493,0.0014393689,0.000012490086,0.000014165215,0.0000027540034,0.9888306,0.00075260014,0.000028765446,0.0007851534,0.0067860424,0.00018716439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004397834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009542368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08660519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013979798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008985119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094611420","doi":"10.1177/1468794120965374","title":"A critical discussion of the use of film in participatory research projects with homeless young people: an analysis based on case examples from England and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Central Lancashire; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Publics; Participatory design; Media studies; Economic Justice; The Symbolic; Gender studies; Public relations; Politics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8844590982352759,"score_gpt":0.7048359669098964,"score_spread":0.17962313132537955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094611420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956681,0.00003080271,0.0002037699,0.0030413037,0.00001153499,0.00067342224,0.00027482718,0.000006141392,0.000090064175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907434,0.000007959107,0.00066263194,0.000025058644,0.00003179828,0.00015343676,0.0000058546902,0.000014842579,0.000024089246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9319644,0.06258677,0.0003875925,0.0005243225,0.003690321,0.00084658357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96121126,0.03628009,0.00007257288,0.00043223472,0.0013767816,0.0006270504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02499495,0.00012764061,0.00050290575,0.00044147068,0.000598049,0.000107361106,0.00040538324,0.00008980629,0.00009051111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059458513,0.0000738598,0.00004707113,0.0043082926,0.0030248256,0.0002953679,0.00019597237,0.0008615441,5.057262e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091978116,0.0002987464,0.4284475,0.00014559188,0.000071777584,0.00018124768,0.56561273,0.00031430394,0.00088691025,0.0024747862,0.00006374811,0.0005828932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088779564,0.0011553762,0.3438099,0.00019829841,0.00004858188,4.0653424e-7,0.6124431,0.03870334,0.00198438,0.00036470438,0.00021045213,0.00019368641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9347423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08463759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032988947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113809065","doi":"10.1177/1468794120980975","title":"The Face in Visual Representations of Children","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Politics; Sociology; Visual culture; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35701017037661714,"score_gpt":0.6298668888188117,"score_spread":0.27285671844219456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113809065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587769,0.0001320725,0.00017702363,0.028135331,0.000019482643,0.0004493925,0.000012133344,0.00001161486,0.012286067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992212,0.00008926274,0.00003795487,0.000029294859,0.000086396125,0.00002515617,0.000006769208,0.0000039742677,0.00050001184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946698,0.0039548245,0.00021310456,0.00015187789,0.00073733315,0.0002730766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964283,0.0031242662,0.000045732228,0.00008330953,0.00022767088,0.00009071814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046500084,0.0000379386,0.00008352114,0.00005732207,0.0005638535,0.000051749634,0.00021107928,0.000032676973,0.00009042827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031724107,0.000025824149,0.000030935378,0.0009327566,0.00075914786,0.000113551025,0.000045520184,0.00020995729,0.000055549877],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044146713,0.00004948441,0.009572125,0.0000035827004,0.000014824824,4.679746e-7,0.7959577,0.000023293429,0.00012829635,0.19029404,0.0016838628,0.0022281788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006781774,0.00032575356,0.17191313,0.00002927163,0.0000050302333,8.6560554e-8,0.7847389,0.0004871739,0.0017877195,0.032088917,0.0077861184,0.00015972565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007949347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038847295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.162341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038920443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018626252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171410757","doi":"10.1177/14687941211010029","title":"Imagining research together and working across divides: Arts-informed research about young people’s (post) digital lives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participatory action research; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Visual research; The arts; Focus group; Conceptual framework; Photo elicitation; Realization (probability); Participatory design; Visual arts; Social science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8777786780609822,"score_gpt":0.786335206735945,"score_spread":0.09144347132503716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171410757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803203,0.0030646115,0.00024151539,0.008140487,0.00019330393,0.0012572795,0.000082032,0.00012781931,0.18368994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742951,0.0012562362,0.0018711333,0.0000429319,0.0006229842,0.0006123345,0.000023800774,0.00009466893,0.021180807],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92024434,0.058118492,0.0009610449,0.0016885007,0.012513743,0.0064738924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89171857,0.09218644,0.00012364148,0.0010955068,0.013062764,0.001813074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19297639,0.00034800288,0.00068213907,0.0012102774,0.0082013225,0.005077108,0.0015070832,0.000334083,0.00056343345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21675785,0.00034308204,0.00018263978,0.007775233,0.012216418,0.0021122769,0.0029323956,0.00499839,0.0008075859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023693974,0.0002436379,0.021153273,0.00016711019,0.000109179135,0.00017031931,0.88112146,9.1572997e-7,0.0025610721,0.05826323,0.001829386,0.03414347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057101325,0.00037734708,0.010708169,0.00052744034,0.0000035152664,0.0000071127192,0.89967126,0.000077742945,0.0013138084,0.027855653,0.05849579,0.00039114786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00872721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02521175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1710921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015914944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063878493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185729747","doi":"10.1177/14687941211034963","title":"“You have the right to love and be loved”: participatory theatre for disability justice with self-advocates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Canadian Institute for Health Information","funders":"Vancouver Foundation","keywords":"Ableism; Citizenship; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Self-advocacy; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Reproductive health; Participatory action research; Intellectual disability; Disability studies; Liminality; Human sexuality; Citizen journalism; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.2785678661328887,"score_gpt":0.5688530088332308,"score_spread":0.29028514270034206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185729747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69835854,0.0003362164,0.00079418527,0.23364958,0.000117779105,0.002457473,0.000105767176,0.00004905538,0.06413141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307275,0.000042469364,0.0009647132,0.00022186823,0.00019884038,0.00016396292,0.000009684749,0.000013429596,0.0053122696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337965,0.0044710217,0.00021142514,0.000483534,0.0009026258,0.0005517513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891843,0.009284214,0.000037512073,0.00034169934,0.0009077836,0.0002444413],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008365425,0.00010897892,0.00017949237,0.000029280864,0.0010618347,0.00023959101,0.00021716744,0.00006790918,0.00024410544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019542107,0.000059323742,0.00005387639,0.0004569784,0.0029733416,0.0002108275,0.000097775366,0.00021702668,0.00004019372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017126152,0.00039617863,0.0020725527,0.0001606978,0.00006538247,0.0000032655687,0.8217746,0.000008159527,0.00013675349,0.17055213,0.0030619954,0.0015970428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032486007,0.00023943969,0.0015574263,0.000025836674,0.00005102258,4.935062e-7,0.8502071,0.00008224694,0.001419982,0.063279085,0.08266881,0.00014371693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013760432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013934871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29471424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001859502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004111132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206381486","doi":"10.1177/14687941211049323","title":"Binary blues: Exploring beyond dichotomized gender comparisons with a theory-driven approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College of the Rockies; University of Toronto; York University; University of Victoria; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Dualism; Reflexivity; Gender schema theory; Sociology; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Photo elicitation; Epistemology; Feminist theory; Intersectionality; Binary opposition; Psychology; Social psychology; Feminism; Social science","score_opus":0.5904492538822896,"score_gpt":0.5490854375029681,"score_spread":0.041363816379321516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206381486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7279489,0.0038287183,0.007552097,0.009098963,0.00019207658,0.0011519678,0.000046570585,0.00016163627,0.25001904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865442,0.0007785069,0.0054670656,0.000057448888,0.00015702829,0.00037023108,0.000018248886,0.000023929182,0.0065833484],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98789245,0.008910948,0.0002399232,0.0005164247,0.0016262629,0.000813983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968826,0.0014625996,0.00005754828,0.00030053733,0.0010815454,0.00021512959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941779,0.00014880503,0.00035777534,0.00016713428,0.0022147961,0.00026904923,0.00035587273,0.00006784801,0.00012823373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011378787,0.00012462142,0.00009890686,0.0013213502,0.0007903546,0.0003673813,0.00028985183,0.00054104126,0.00011757166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015841793,0.00031300538,0.0020118044,0.00007003755,0.0003011015,0.000033206266,0.77565956,0.000030547013,0.00012621771,0.20953152,0.011499518,0.0002650943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007910408,0.000084680956,0.0016303556,0.000028546623,0.00001811392,9.3622026e-7,0.96879774,0.00006339208,0.00008186308,0.019218639,0.009105045,0.0001796604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010309076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012506723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25859526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019355598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005676642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214749562","doi":"10.1177/14687941211072792","title":"Listen to her: Re-finding culturally responsive poetic inquiry as home knowing for women of African descent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","keywords":"Storytelling; Sociology; The arts; Poetry; African descent; Knowledge production; Poetics; Immigration; Aesthetics; Psychology; Narrative; Anthropology; Visual arts; Computer science; Knowledge management; History","score_opus":0.6545711309947028,"score_gpt":0.6849552118196327,"score_spread":0.030384080824929938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214749562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968531,0.00066824595,0.0028147537,0.059369013,0.0003828989,0.004074281,0.0002965873,0.00008272303,0.035458434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962565,0.000119379525,0.010250216,0.00024290622,0.00024318232,0.002062967,0.000014012177,0.00004975174,0.024452573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9356453,0.056931123,0.00067163707,0.0007108825,0.004176615,0.0018644799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578453,0.03791783,0.00019061819,0.00039466843,0.0029088638,0.0007427399],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12667198,0.00019282562,0.00052851654,0.00093484053,0.0032212038,0.00016423018,0.0010930835,0.00011368215,0.0007033188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05258899,0.00018527827,0.00019059818,0.0033582114,0.0023759047,0.00026557042,0.0007799754,0.0012405302,0.000048507718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010567345,0.000119931356,0.000028488808,0.00014321413,0.00007231815,0.000009730535,0.81169647,0.000017493243,0.0040700994,0.17533398,0.00247252,0.0049790205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038170072,0.0019459183,0.00013403803,0.00007112198,0.0000033433216,4.0933043e-7,0.8004222,0.000009755645,0.00033203518,0.09577623,0.10071776,0.00020550826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031805453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036448587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09824524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026413563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021289983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225009018","doi":"10.1177/14687941221096604","title":"A side-by-side methodological approach: Shared experience, informality and adaptation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Qualitative research; Face (sociological concept); Adaptation (eye); Common ground; Great Rift; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.8740419199226072,"score_gpt":0.7055077223247346,"score_spread":0.16853419759787258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225009018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31356075,0.0037529783,0.23099536,0.03897593,0.0003028128,0.0059421477,0.0008672543,0.00037250627,0.40523025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81836873,0.0006365472,0.16923514,0.00047780675,0.00015451421,0.0032480084,0.00012414671,0.000035416902,0.0077196686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.86729366,0.12597273,0.00061953,0.00069555937,0.0041675367,0.0012509571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96520257,0.03293888,0.00015517682,0.0002820352,0.0009214882,0.0004998603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17057388,0.00017438593,0.00038872173,0.00036985788,0.004497324,0.00028909647,0.0006568385,0.00015267186,0.0007030912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041071597,0.00016067566,0.00009751725,0.0019774586,0.0049798754,0.0006669118,0.00073767465,0.0019718814,0.000020674835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016018588,0.000110589295,0.0000785031,0.00004185479,0.00002345813,0.000004174013,0.68878883,0.00000954167,0.00043048756,0.2906348,0.0026172916,0.01710025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002887106,0.00033858174,0.0002716328,0.000006875692,0.0000023307196,0.0000012235517,0.77742684,0.0006017525,0.00005199615,0.10798684,0.1128374,0.00018579801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018415075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.504808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048237844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077096955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229441438","doi":"10.1177/14687941221096592","title":"“He/his/she/her/father/mother/son/daughter”: A critical reflection of reproductions of cis-normativity and cis-dominance in preparing qualitative data for analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Heteronormativity; Dominance (genetics); Sociology; Qualitative research; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social justice; Gender studies; Social psychology; Human sexuality; Social science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7397011393593811,"score_gpt":0.7417182434142487,"score_spread":0.0020171040548676578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229441438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.628221,0.0057561034,0.289567,0.043316506,0.0003955322,0.0061959983,0.0055263783,0.00011524987,0.020906271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605828,0.00039420798,0.036712676,0.000020179787,0.00008059145,0.00065296463,0.00006482886,0.000030667365,0.0014611012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92216647,0.07204187,0.0011433321,0.0011664797,0.0025786809,0.0009031707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9412923,0.054826763,0.00041582674,0.0011446584,0.002105977,0.00021451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16038938,0.00019254768,0.000836378,0.0013032396,0.001505303,0.00007278417,0.0009156658,0.00013736676,0.00018406958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075043805,0.00019885838,0.00018019542,0.005704462,0.004889235,0.0008036061,0.0008022949,0.0012163672,0.0000018211197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083338196,0.0005486897,0.0002260021,0.0004455599,0.00037219218,0.0000015396419,0.7811474,0.00006365158,0.0019876305,0.20816164,0.001028058,0.0051842504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057578174,0.0009301855,0.0006055246,0.00009187875,0.00007080598,6.0346105e-7,0.776613,0.002001625,0.00054907287,0.21214466,0.006182676,0.00023416798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016025893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008383538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33236182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004977029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087556866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280498888","doi":"10.1177/14687941221098927","title":"Hierarchy and inequality in research: Navigating the challenges of research in Ghana","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inequality; Stigma (botany); Mental health; Data collection; Hierarchy; Psychology; Focus group; Sociology; Public relations; Applied psychology; Political science; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8968303792439632,"score_gpt":0.7578192566602281,"score_spread":0.13901112258373516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280498888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7898038,0.012256459,0.000022806136,0.16028357,0.00007063319,0.0021069953,0.000060934814,0.00002217191,0.03537262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937712,0.0033624591,0.0011875947,0.00003584834,0.00012445681,0.0010367389,0.000003954747,0.000032426746,0.00044532208],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.42563242,0.5539968,0.0013410107,0.0012766919,0.014258401,0.0034946592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8033647,0.1920969,0.00014367382,0.00078559486,0.0032165132,0.0003926114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.66805655,0.00017357194,0.00053274824,0.00211983,0.00426925,0.00015650009,0.0016837646,0.0001957635,0.00019229283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07024662,0.00014659263,0.0000799852,0.010801266,0.017360324,0.00035675493,0.002310078,0.013576922,0.000015594736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001351699,0.000184115,0.0006043578,0.00017652872,0.000010404463,0.000024292769,0.49329758,0.0000033440522,0.00013351439,0.49015772,0.00012910571,0.015143867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003160041,0.0004110634,0.0014892708,0.00021449488,3.8552807e-7,4.816136e-7,0.5941021,0.000058175516,0.000056188004,0.40065074,0.0026065023,0.00009462938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075106256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021887878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5978099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013710685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024856464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99702704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283590961","doi":"10.1177/14687941221110179","title":"Ethically important moments: Researching the intimate lives of adults labeled/with intellectual disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Embodied cognition; Intellectual disability; Romance; Psychology; Sociology; Disability studies; Human sexuality; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21977121593601365,"score_gpt":0.5549950202975042,"score_spread":0.3352238043614906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283590961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592429,0.00017359901,0.00007572591,0.017209593,0.000057339785,0.0010347131,0.000066868015,0.000031836415,0.022107445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952956,0.00013530566,0.00019412357,0.000031490166,0.000052413823,0.0002915735,0.000013191735,0.000014242556,0.0039720736],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794612,0.015852451,0.0004471692,0.00037360998,0.0032534765,0.0006121241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721369,0.02636803,0.00011224923,0.00036814794,0.00088500546,0.00012962855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026987292,0.000101038684,0.00020350875,0.00018329594,0.0027421247,0.00012330142,0.0007430054,0.000038023154,0.002089622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014904101,0.000057510228,0.00007543235,0.0012809566,0.00726148,0.0002192343,0.00046114382,0.001109439,0.000018566236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049048587,0.00025325775,0.0007860942,0.00005885113,0.000051019793,0.0000021222315,0.81589496,0.00001743293,0.00012728215,0.18068302,0.0007225133,0.000912954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024889616,0.00070711836,0.00020929202,0.000038315877,0.000003707719,5.583448e-7,0.9275203,0.00009222917,0.00019336364,0.067356765,0.0035425127,0.00008696208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013089862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028685692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11332625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029286052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006639409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297995984","doi":"10.1177/14687941221129804","title":"Future memory work: unsettling temporal Othering through speculative research practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions","keywords":"Construct (python library); Memory work; Indigenous; Dimension (graph theory); Work (physics); Narrative; Sociology; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5443132042881852,"score_gpt":0.6174875122738533,"score_spread":0.07317430798566815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297995984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6939292,0.00437218,0.0007589511,0.01855646,0.0014903204,0.0018866195,0.00007875093,0.00017600194,0.2787515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660706,0.00004699682,0.002098472,0.00023119642,0.0015500687,0.0011037773,0.00009966024,0.00010160215,0.02869765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.960068,0.033828076,0.0005897875,0.0010465472,0.003057467,0.0014101159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006313,0.007432554,0.00036337748,0.0009737513,0.000982554,0.00018464505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03466629,0.00026153767,0.00037920353,0.00066808617,0.0026869318,0.0002048255,0.00097148336,0.00015632168,0.009717487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001409492,0.0002598667,0.00013012203,0.0034072734,0.00072202954,0.00048546423,0.00056196545,0.0032827056,0.0009609713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018570352,0.0007705222,0.0007720869,0.00008670648,0.00028729546,0.0002365308,0.8035744,0.000084668616,0.00079414074,0.092626244,0.08576157,0.01314881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090922177,0.0007716258,0.0014790022,0.00003595612,0.000007747793,0.000013950482,0.84467584,0.000051483792,0.00030796364,0.02164914,0.12979414,0.00030395424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019146625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016192358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27214137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005854522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003419342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378652588","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176931","title":"Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Focus group; Great Rift; Focus (optics); Psychology; Dynamics (music); Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5136757521572586,"score_gpt":0.6439928010743068,"score_spread":0.1303170489170482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378652588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7933144,0.0001641439,0.00054514664,0.04347616,0.00014608615,0.00164691,0.00008966233,0.00021713009,0.16040036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97628874,0.00024811894,0.0034827713,0.0002886256,0.00017977922,0.0003206886,0.000017267173,0.000056233635,0.019117795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97151446,0.02414028,0.00041644322,0.0005707667,0.0021059602,0.0012520856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756574,0.023202095,0.00008525788,0.0003143158,0.00046298947,0.00027794286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04141534,0.0002001507,0.0003942793,0.00082270755,0.0008277026,0.00012965003,0.0004951098,0.00013112678,0.00038396174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007723988,0.00014202655,0.000073261115,0.004542209,0.0015621735,0.0003017461,0.00011153005,0.00087510835,0.0008709949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008671619,0.00029007162,0.0006808215,0.000040021754,0.000045313584,0.00014786681,0.6607556,0.0000065691484,0.00013010688,0.29524648,0.010543258,0.031246766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014671988,0.0020367343,0.006277556,0.00022107204,0.000003751552,5.477019e-7,0.85318124,0.000047719666,0.00041879338,0.09792877,0.03808188,0.00033474853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006675435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016651567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1973177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045365194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037444755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378831244","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176947","title":"Charlas y Comidas: Humanising focus groups and interviews","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Ethnography; Focus group; Feeling; Sociology; Qualitative research; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7236316614784513,"score_gpt":0.7390011184585082,"score_spread":0.015369456980056984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378831244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8047174,0.00048356666,0.00003188149,0.022420248,0.00019756888,0.0004166964,0.000012407471,0.00012635019,0.17159384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98124325,0.00047554998,0.00008908206,0.0001436014,0.00035811684,0.000044877674,0.0000060662505,0.000011494722,0.017627941],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943179,0.0042506107,0.00018019891,0.00021152948,0.0005696354,0.00047012328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655145,0.0028120056,0.0000355814,0.00012647029,0.0002845523,0.00018995957],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013101494,0.00006463157,0.00012376742,0.00032941162,0.00096737593,0.00017170847,0.00020468312,0.000057787103,0.0004838032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033949383,0.000060714614,0.00003301961,0.00095007924,0.000775028,0.00013798333,0.00010075529,0.00028127234,0.0010214044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005055681,0.000016331865,0.00005766704,0.000017757371,0.000005680153,0.0000011326686,0.7181074,3.6494303e-8,0.000103506056,0.24498415,0.0066837505,0.030017508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014532129,0.000047912727,0.0011541004,0.00004255979,0.0000011053024,1.564592e-7,0.68941426,0.000030140585,0.000107707376,0.044676155,0.26429266,0.00008788452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007316938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024223658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25760892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101165344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022025105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386419969","doi":"10.1177/14687941231196382","title":"Anti-oppression as praxis in the research field: Implementing emancipatory approaches for researchers and community partners","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Praxis; Oppression; Sociology; Transformative learning; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.9535102794223602,"score_gpt":0.7943083438193271,"score_spread":0.15920193560303308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386419969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8780637,0.0005737645,0.00031478849,0.07620614,0.000051424428,0.0033680063,0.000044315573,0.00007303421,0.04130484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923218,0.0012305225,0.0012415882,0.00012656412,0.00019251146,0.0017477478,0.000034639965,0.000037057478,0.0030675966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.76251954,0.22768578,0.0006122256,0.00068572623,0.005308598,0.0031881414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75589675,0.24130236,0.00008334143,0.00064660516,0.00168351,0.00038744585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.58693707,0.00017582031,0.00035897488,0.0013002477,0.009383323,0.0005397613,0.0014062596,0.00029615394,0.00007282501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16193561,0.00013406907,0.0001020062,0.0049716467,0.0060017714,0.00044311018,0.00092311756,0.0057075927,0.00007030361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264643,0.00012836912,0.00066398265,0.00029890612,0.000026561345,0.000008857147,0.7056546,0.0000014224894,0.00022838796,0.2612751,0.012754201,0.018833114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034229446,0.0005079445,0.0011089887,0.000110850015,0.0000015488043,2.2703543e-7,0.7096415,0.00016444888,0.0002214747,0.23782599,0.049956262,0.00011843105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020147637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006920908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42500147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030486725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012898754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391142721","doi":"10.1177/14687941231224590","title":"Mapping working practices as systems: An analytical model for visualising findings from an institutional ethnography","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Participant observation; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8410049251210757,"score_gpt":0.7516451382818904,"score_spread":0.08935978683918533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391142721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313939,0.0017557542,0.052230775,0.0065483307,0.00056675577,0.0022305297,0.0001636035,0.00023896559,0.004871364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98691696,0.000099179226,0.009705568,0.0006446865,0.0004592086,0.0008813939,0.00041936367,0.00004237851,0.0008312887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98737013,0.008946272,0.0008260918,0.00059515296,0.0011769276,0.0010854258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747225,0.023200361,0.00015903624,0.00040992445,0.00092415855,0.0005840278],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026421677,0.0001896706,0.00034365003,0.0011305535,0.003953796,0.00026606026,0.00041662654,0.0002868946,0.000100963225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057186605,0.00017214085,0.00007834811,0.001391981,0.00029843036,0.0009106933,0.000238196,0.0024164594,0.00017757516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003882133,0.00018057237,0.0017029935,0.0017165506,0.00013055585,0.000014143979,0.6978938,0.00013198725,0.0001266344,0.29179883,0.0028600215,0.0030556691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040812598,0.00020347438,0.0008014792,0.00225981,0.000010026289,9.477857e-7,0.4674559,0.46688676,0.0000028247641,0.035428785,0.026330441,0.00021143009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006428214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000744443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46675476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007233726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040116287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391157828","doi":"10.1177/14687941231224591","title":"Who can you trust these days?: Dealing with imposter participants during online recruitment and data collection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Data collection; Psychology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.568417349501868,"score_gpt":0.6156968205055752,"score_spread":0.04727947100370722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391157828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835186,0.0021567913,0.00022039471,0.009657045,0.000021242355,0.0012990372,0.00050246296,0.00006078548,0.0025636607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503301,0.00089256436,0.0006312952,0.000023844395,0.00014073959,0.00021695049,0.00031982356,0.00004513561,0.047399558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625295,0.0011546476,0.00032641843,0.0006062998,0.0009391823,0.0007204817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977846,0.00082276226,0.000025914367,0.0005573605,0.00038792592,0.00042141002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044128965,0.00014554737,0.00026570237,0.00054416765,0.00029182935,0.00018527477,0.00018919642,0.00005858346,0.00036738513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013486953,0.00010170238,0.000046214038,0.000818759,0.0003893905,0.0002498603,0.00031628832,0.00073784194,0.00004642207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011916392,0.0032288036,0.021966947,0.011213082,0.0059097693,0.0032908076,0.572113,0.0000075851785,0.0925418,0.012883529,0.07235247,0.19257583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01441679,0.052528333,0.058861792,0.026328035,0.0006538452,0.00077756005,0.5856052,0.10610192,0.036921144,0.004488136,0.11155992,0.0017573343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012209878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016140597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19081849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025421835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003559767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41473028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395003839","doi":"10.1177/14687941241246173","title":"Affecting photos: Photographs as shared, affective ethnographic spaces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Affect (linguistics); Ethnography; Popularity; Visual research; Sociology; Photo elicitation; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Visual culture; Extant taxon; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Art; Communication; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8133724478262857,"score_gpt":0.777889685872314,"score_spread":0.03548276195397171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395003839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81789744,0.0048684594,0.00071840925,0.002000766,0.00042252592,0.0018369753,0.00004665093,0.0005612608,0.17164753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935403,0.0004953502,0.0011201162,0.000048296417,0.0003679787,0.00071463094,0.000005757282,0.00006492645,0.0036426762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9492752,0.043323476,0.00036031325,0.0010076858,0.0039350213,0.0020982916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960688,0.036995746,0.000056149296,0.00040602137,0.0010496469,0.0008044465],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08899198,0.0002690192,0.00039202656,0.001960875,0.0021657357,0.0013494431,0.00079194905,0.0002703044,0.0017655632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0336417,0.00024854427,0.00031128476,0.008207671,0.0040682773,0.0009355988,0.000210612,0.002059052,0.0015197941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112209,0.00014294137,0.00058677996,0.0002430271,0.00022823543,0.00015456937,0.8480173,0.0000010928669,0.015536843,0.11504302,0.003603913,0.0163301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028416657,0.0007974813,0.0004265698,0.0005990081,0.00001834955,0.0000020170717,0.8205602,0.0002140183,0.01267576,0.09749379,0.06648796,0.00044064433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017117457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028954868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17564285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054328283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015322355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399589192","doi":"10.1177/14687941241259965","title":"Chasing scorpions across North Africa: Ethical reflections on life story research with Sub-Saharan migrants","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6505494682052942,"score_gpt":0.6604122938989678,"score_spread":0.009862825693673583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399589192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94342506,0.00469988,0.00082563295,0.023833083,0.0005275704,0.0013266752,0.00031997755,0.0002474964,0.024794647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99031585,0.00020821174,0.0001783942,0.00027029842,0.000523581,0.0007906052,0.000057241272,0.00008308161,0.007572703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97795564,0.016058581,0.00048480902,0.0011167222,0.0023823604,0.002001906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830481,0.014038258,0.00004584474,0.0007153657,0.0013650064,0.0007874565],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023241097,0.00025164796,0.0003391105,0.0015317026,0.002764977,0.00026899955,0.00041091742,0.0004383386,0.00045454106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027892508,0.00020433233,0.00010509767,0.005418596,0.0016546871,0.00016615506,0.00008436853,0.008173423,0.0038956439],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013195757,0.0004821341,0.00024686585,0.00029700247,0.00020081768,0.00017106469,0.7356494,0.0000057756265,0.0002948112,0.12690572,0.12922877,0.0051980526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023332045,0.0076868217,0.0566188,0.0013917087,0.000025868128,0.000052827534,0.5715038,0.00015407131,0.0002106491,0.013198451,0.34597588,0.00084792904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016480733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012616511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21674712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044601003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012768636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401395734","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264677","title":"North-South research collaboration during complex global emergencies: Qualitative knowledge production and sharing during COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Multinational corporation; Latin Americans; Public administration; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.7438499382076558,"score_gpt":0.737893983678502,"score_spread":0.005955954529153762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401395734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397735,0.004848095,0.0012298705,0.03750392,0.0004403809,0.0023104602,0.00035687847,0.0003606651,0.013176203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202187,0.0017642851,0.002160509,0.000021266564,0.0009237515,0.00052698335,0.000042658357,0.000060487357,0.012478194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9159758,0.07390637,0.00092708133,0.0018998655,0.0049544703,0.0023364055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724846,0.018589092,0.00013536114,0.000647726,0.0065473174,0.00159591],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13780631,0.00035062272,0.0005188142,0.0014157542,0.00842548,0.0013402612,0.0007902705,0.00031811898,0.00043723124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09796226,0.00034390623,0.00013196669,0.011010338,0.008330206,0.0013381424,0.00080736016,0.002459852,0.00035156115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002616311,0.00008793093,0.0006043422,0.0017852923,0.00011457186,0.00003088284,0.76080525,0.000011491178,0.0013505785,0.23212126,0.0024643815,0.00036236012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030599837,0.00018371143,0.0020295244,0.0003126935,0.000007555015,0.0000029989455,0.8789326,0.00014374047,0.0002517424,0.104416765,0.0130409645,0.0003717138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059423936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031868815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1277045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043783025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004299622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401395760","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264473","title":"But where's the body? Bodies, time, money, and the political economy of post-pandemic field research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia; York University; Carleton University; Saint Mary's University; St. Thomas University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Notice; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Underpinning; Field research; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Political economy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.4365221344450209,"score_gpt":0.6675999920764029,"score_spread":0.23107785763138194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401395760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019118108,0.013650662,0.00061284204,0.6102449,0.00010640691,0.0016053776,0.00009684662,0.000064809734,0.35450006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96460533,0.0032245382,0.0011813632,0.0010813887,0.000849247,0.00047828094,0.000008167803,0.0000579074,0.028513748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9085223,0.08576454,0.0005658729,0.0005834584,0.002822251,0.0017415627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7811414,0.21526395,0.000045806817,0.00046184292,0.0027173376,0.00036967045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19016284,0.00016489644,0.00039593567,0.00044815821,0.0022561958,0.00061349006,0.0010241031,0.00026323323,0.00049777824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0451038,0.000091744194,0.00016647551,0.0012023017,0.023112426,0.00033187072,0.00059767236,0.0034319055,0.00024508074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022690193,0.000026817519,0.000020854015,0.0001832172,0.00009379548,0.000006765932,0.21811543,5.2398082e-8,0.00028009387,0.76564157,0.0118491035,0.0035553821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021447513,0.00027628063,0.000023790997,0.00011614238,0.0000057394755,0.000001393482,0.35258946,0.00019013257,0.00022571419,0.5875886,0.058688175,0.00008007997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026077753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014580623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94548726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029408635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024155513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401445786","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264458","title":"Designing afro-emancipatory qualitative research with and for Black people","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Gender studies; Participatory action research; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5807845116684713,"score_gpt":0.7175607221607525,"score_spread":0.13677621049228117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401445786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016077,0.0024148168,0.015276545,0.041563362,0.0002214276,0.0028459902,0.0000861367,0.00018725893,0.035796754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98493546,0.00014240594,0.0051001254,0.000029464964,0.0003948315,0.0007898441,0.000011472441,0.000047376423,0.00854903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97429466,0.021399977,0.00028590448,0.00067613594,0.002113085,0.0012302181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92348015,0.073502444,0.000025373081,0.00023413464,0.002390356,0.0003675454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.091104366,0.00014442483,0.0002455712,0.0006446639,0.0016907374,0.00054413953,0.00033149758,0.00013766241,0.00022442386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022098416,0.00012614524,0.00005096841,0.002109774,0.0053736586,0.0005330045,0.000099867146,0.000948073,0.00026567047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099240584,0.000043327676,0.000008701554,0.0002200395,0.000024941548,0.0000020670443,0.54001343,6.6853113e-7,0.00041100406,0.454844,0.0034391035,0.000893486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012587711,0.00037659763,0.00003284496,0.00020778822,0.0000060371067,3.304495e-7,0.6490557,0.000081297396,0.00032908015,0.3406572,0.009008597,0.00011865402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014477205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003745468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114186786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006650014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016226021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406435274","doi":"10.1177/14687941241306234","title":"Indigenizing collaborative methods in studying human–water relations in the Syilx Okanagan Territory of British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.24034355422726286,"score_gpt":0.6232601032350691,"score_spread":0.38291654900780625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406435274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590389,0.00052513933,0.000050357554,0.0019862268,0.00021650924,0.0023530005,0.0000944718,0.0000071997897,0.035728157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886456,0.00003692666,0.0006939998,0.0002788919,0.00003981368,0.0009885338,0.0000205473,0.000013333834,0.009282368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.973416,0.023757318,0.0008565414,0.00030673877,0.00044569196,0.0012177309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880215,0.010631845,0.000107803266,0.00024401738,0.00095686346,0.000038003727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025193138,0.00008594751,0.00042245476,0.00030791515,0.0039297836,0.000025847072,0.0003574138,0.000149796,0.00018593369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015910773,0.000090148606,0.000029352519,0.0014781551,0.00030182282,0.00007614181,0.00034096392,0.0015800389,0.00000819736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016524935,0.00012480773,0.15035026,0.00022512501,0.00007472944,0.00003390846,0.83092093,0.000008890704,0.00018642617,0.0017760803,0.015937906,0.0003443885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051918806,0.00009254735,0.1583918,0.00021512894,0.0000045937472,1.6659467e-7,0.83010274,0.0000051747634,0.000010817712,0.0031092684,0.0074731125,0.00007548448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029606648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001939449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035217244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99736696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410412565","doi":"10.1177/14687941251341992","title":"How can institutions better support researchers? The case of extremism and terrorism research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Violent extremism; Political science; Criminology; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.5260104981497145,"score_gpt":0.6309501166253352,"score_spread":0.10493961847562072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410412565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7697516,0.0007672377,0.00046578998,0.19174276,0.00021462332,0.0010481172,0.00012635854,0.0000387021,0.03584479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808072,0.00033458916,0.00006442635,0.00024297187,0.0002147022,0.00019088927,0.00000579208,0.000013494045,0.01812596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226494,0.013541302,0.00038423366,0.00056278193,0.0017388946,0.0015078284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867431,0.010081015,0.0000568729,0.0006443249,0.0020672684,0.0004074334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031229649,0.0001652554,0.00029222228,0.00076966727,0.002907955,0.0003959376,0.0008871697,0.00023616175,0.00013807314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00891509,0.00012330039,0.00009158771,0.0022318354,0.011570332,0.00035165565,0.00048241045,0.0018534922,0.000022883027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049678878,0.00011168548,0.00034307985,0.00011627645,0.000059130693,0.00028539097,0.7369197,8.156249e-8,0.00036689398,0.22651353,0.017994795,0.017239736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027078035,0.00017005992,0.00042438717,0.00013400769,0.0000083631885,0.000011698077,0.8940542,0.000013812242,0.00029342668,0.051375285,0.05312398,0.000120041404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034703232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0139049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21105556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044201053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021829929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411659748","doi":"10.1177/14687941251337243","title":"Land-based métissage: An arts-based praxis of reconciliation among humans and with the more-than-human","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Praxis; The arts; Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.2560797498543263,"score_gpt":0.586539785092461,"score_spread":0.33046003523813466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411659748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531029,0.00022203955,0.0010029847,0.014565329,0.000016794085,0.0004744991,0.000011179187,0.000021468748,0.030582845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980797,0.00003348728,0.00017161365,0.00010983107,0.000031753076,0.00004200016,0.000006632806,0.000003608881,0.0015213691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959973,0.0026473566,0.0001621378,0.00023699256,0.0006359113,0.00032031405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695,0.0021811128,0.00007089627,0.00015039422,0.0005828513,0.000064744956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055588447,0.0000790464,0.00017171049,0.00008780758,0.0021277086,0.00006112443,0.00019365562,0.00006819693,0.0001670129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000644762,0.000044485434,0.000029976813,0.00056578935,0.0055090296,0.00011251474,0.00003785508,0.00022742653,0.0000021751275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037447884,0.00047050547,0.096968055,0.00015509689,0.0001210655,0.0000071246427,0.36253667,0.000030990323,0.00035090873,0.5271692,0.004632638,0.0071832356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009549578,0.0018779619,0.1885642,0.0001416958,0.000017366767,1.8025341e-8,0.77612793,0.00019541559,0.00081713917,0.0104094455,0.02070546,0.00018841932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021381294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04471211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5167598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008816369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018257326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414630040","doi":"10.1177/14687941251377267","title":"Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Closeness; Field (mathematics); Conceptual framework","score_opus":0.9671774531523792,"score_gpt":0.8619748596545497,"score_spread":0.10520259349782957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414630040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5671032,0.002309254,0.023645947,0.013969539,0.00048601997,0.0044106916,0.00005488838,0.00014050501,0.38787994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95788926,0.0003616532,0.027857076,0.000078683974,0.00012429936,0.0018364758,0.000010433825,0.000039412684,0.011802732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5725784,0.41492218,0.0014378001,0.0014549553,0.005664519,0.003942183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073745,0.08733326,0.00011951929,0.0007943676,0.003728217,0.0006501277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43805265,0.00028416095,0.00079742185,0.0054202788,0.0013087721,0.00043870372,0.0014515165,0.00042363338,0.00040723354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2475392,0.00028926803,0.00013341618,0.014186943,0.0061501423,0.0008359099,0.00070407067,0.0038011016,0.00028969074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030925643,0.0003273605,0.00053616706,0.00011441335,0.00002532509,0.000032261098,0.5107169,0.000004434275,0.0018134622,0.4683335,0.0012382768,0.016548626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066743337,0.00019603853,0.0046565863,0.000303552,0.0000025371758,7.610303e-8,0.5499932,0.0002612564,0.00091399107,0.42986032,0.012952023,0.00019296323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0603392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025362834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.390786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004738327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005179142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414715934","doi":"10.1177/14687941251377273","title":"From language to translanguaging in qualitative research: Exploring methodological and pedagogical possibilities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Translanguaging; Conceptualization; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Multilingualism; Frame (networking); Discipline","score_opus":0.9675376536282085,"score_gpt":0.8316695151334669,"score_spread":0.13586813849474166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414715934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313541,0.0012440007,0.0003179058,0.033611085,0.000109898,0.00062927965,0.000044346016,0.000045057543,0.032644298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976385,0.00015705868,0.005604769,0.00029491517,0.00028730292,0.00035880128,0.000008977358,0.0000111762065,0.016892001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94992065,0.047027335,0.00038763738,0.0006023637,0.0011680411,0.00089395116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491447,0.04962514,0.000025548254,0.0002500526,0.0005622093,0.00039232854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061569728,0.00012919583,0.00031264708,0.0011008128,0.0007113568,0.00019823526,0.00040487587,0.0001129182,0.00044263905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05042071,0.00011613387,0.00005138469,0.0021384554,0.0015207363,0.00022314982,0.00016842317,0.0010719517,0.00007104745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012820342,0.00006424083,0.000119276265,0.0000308708,0.000009948762,0.000008225809,0.7966377,7.8242977e-7,0.0004073801,0.1884231,0.00033537773,0.0138349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021216106,0.00005535673,0.0018682298,0.00014490164,0.0000014197105,3.6913836e-8,0.8714516,0.000007902976,0.0002656176,0.114870645,0.011013866,0.000108253415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1054121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009335464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09607664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033842196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083368714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96631145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415819767","doi":"10.1177/14687941251390758","title":"Decolonizing methodology: Co-designing research with the voices and footprints of the community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Fundación para el futuro de Colombia; Universidad de Córdoba","keywords":"General partnership; Praxis; Variety (cybernetics); Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Focus group; Curriculum; Data collection; Qualitative property; Educational research","score_opus":0.6595775891208701,"score_gpt":0.6842154240869632,"score_spread":0.024637834966093175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415819767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110474,0.0004575216,0.00014750914,0.011809924,0.00004002834,0.00076822017,0.0000027179185,0.000008882482,0.07571781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99224687,0.00009486695,0.0011937032,0.00008888409,0.000035803092,0.00008865466,0.0000010017413,0.000005381333,0.0062448177],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92845577,0.069901824,0.00014539057,0.00014608708,0.0008943352,0.00045660895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713836,0.02647489,0.00006725664,0.00029953732,0.0017266019,0.000048159643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08458411,0.000061727194,0.00014085181,0.000142854,0.009341012,0.00012083041,0.00074162666,0.000101893405,0.000017237024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074049197,0.00003303427,0.000029025865,0.0015233746,0.0048872894,0.000078993005,0.00021286674,0.0014336144,0.0000033370325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029283488,0.00005204104,0.0020157732,0.000039483704,0.00003365811,1.3063726e-7,0.75885206,5.496496e-7,0.0006161538,0.23510149,0.0012922862,0.0019670688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087079694,0.000090486006,0.0069578397,0.00007584873,0.0000046988594,1.7007156e-7,0.93249846,8.815153e-7,0.0015846185,0.049605142,0.009056405,0.000038378083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034090955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021227075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18549635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022668086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020561349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99782085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}