{"meta":{"query_hash":"b6bc1cd2abf9","filters":{"venue":"Qualitative Research"},"cohort_total":91,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":91,"exported":91,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b6bc1cd2abf9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Qualitative+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1966332451","doi":"10.1177/1468794112455037","title":"Doing participatory qualitative research: development of a shared critical consciousness with racial minority research advisory group members","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; Association of Local Public Health Agencies; York University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Dialogical self; Critical consciousness; Sociology; General partnership; Participatory action research; Public relations; Qualitative research; Community-based participatory research; Consciousness; Community development; Photovoice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.9089431206035483,"score_gpt":0.7810056252157593,"score_spread":0.12793749538778898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966332451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38708323,0.0022873208,0.36680958,0.14791106,0.0049682036,0.039413203,0.00049394724,0.00092811405,0.050105307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6941406,0.0009787807,0.250247,0.00793119,0.0005037427,0.036806777,0.0002497725,0.00025458273,0.008887549],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7429497,0.22570483,0.0077663185,0.007975853,0.010103806,0.005499477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7661264,0.15279724,0.010940259,0.01941794,0.030538928,0.020179298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23968983,0.0013482716,0.0013615148,0.0045649675,0.024764856,0.012816785,0.004254829,0.0065244897,0.004493356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20012523,0.0018558688,0.001181866,0.002315059,0.024354864,0.0122000845,0.025192456,0.009453331,0.0010311696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010126671,0.00015496,0.001048298,0.00032328424,0.000017443046,0.0006380967,0.9486774,0.00016844073,0.0028189316,0.01723959,0.0036622218,0.025150083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015245934,0.0002926763,0.0015161874,0.0017460017,0.000053391836,0.00088801596,0.7511212,0.0015770006,0.0042904583,0.06687784,0.1713218,0.00016302803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019189479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020912595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7603102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007706866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035083115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981067518","doi":"10.1177/1468794114538896","title":"Talking, wrestling, and recycling: an investigation of three analytic approaches to qualitative data in education research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Ethnomethodology; Conversation; Sociology; Conversation analysis; Semiotics; Qualitative research; Epistemology; Representation (politics); Sociocultural evolution; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social science; Communication","score_opus":0.9264210981600284,"score_gpt":0.7326231661017149,"score_spread":0.19379793205831353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981067518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72404176,0.00214857,0.2161512,0.014330304,0.00025172098,0.0060893046,0.000331754,0.00026215674,0.036393248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012004,0.001298317,0.086553104,0.0014501942,0.000038217924,0.006680636,0.0001118236,0.00018207991,0.0024850946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6946645,0.2716719,0.0081277955,0.004513117,0.015392491,0.005630265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.634114,0.3264348,0.01091921,0.008678596,0.016799264,0.0030541332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21694954,0.0013952724,0.0019101677,0.009430639,0.026588691,0.022213245,0.0059230397,0.0047697094,0.0019888093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25019553,0.002393101,0.0016567358,0.010660695,0.039639145,0.021727873,0.017174108,0.006448139,0.00034582097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003474366,0.000024851473,0.0011046976,0.00029218968,0.000009904889,0.00019802037,0.9774165,0.000066448745,0.00035061993,0.012848203,0.00013587187,0.007517923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002136028,0.00006346672,0.0006634211,0.0010270018,0.000024450055,0.00031028962,0.9787667,0.00060457166,0.00079927535,0.010639585,0.007036992,0.000042870528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008549237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012738566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7830505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021547077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023305297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656406},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1988588354","doi":"10.1177/1468794114543400","title":"Apprenticeship as method: embodied learning in ethnographic practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Emic and etic; Ethnography; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pedagogy; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8886648517063099,"score_gpt":0.8267451170160557,"score_spread":0.06191973469025425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988588354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045332007,0.006394298,0.8434452,0.010834108,0.00087444705,0.004174078,0.00017294934,0.00052334473,0.08824952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37358543,0.0039449013,0.596537,0.0026509603,0.00035744696,0.011614556,0.00012670836,0.0004254693,0.010757528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8342616,0.15791169,0.0017153157,0.0026111603,0.0027592846,0.0007409588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577343,0.12484493,0.0021357706,0.011913936,0.001881468,0.0014895423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.087536685,0.001412748,0.0011755051,0.0075197928,0.0067196595,0.014020154,0.0033940517,0.0034014063,0.005824475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07205234,0.0011157873,0.00081816973,0.0042072115,0.05243211,0.012164875,0.015883246,0.00355097,0.0010117211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068053334,0.00016031787,0.0017303732,0.0012080194,0.00003416305,0.0008204819,0.650115,0.0007559203,0.0017103435,0.25680456,0.0034153298,0.0831775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001840721,0.00028110412,0.0020224089,0.005635301,0.00004216256,0.0033714562,0.34632006,0.0044424627,0.0023564792,0.35276893,0.28243262,0.00014302823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019887413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003945585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087536685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036793463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005519208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4629438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996716493","doi":"10.1177/1468794111404319","title":"Interpreter-facilitated cross-language interviews: a research note","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Qualitative research; Grandparent; Mandarin Chinese; Psychology; Semi-structured interview; Process (computing); Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.8626783080133277,"score_gpt":0.7844615248927833,"score_spread":0.07821678312054436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996716493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5561658,0.009413533,0.24057359,0.050123647,0.0039055462,0.07925064,0.0011919653,0.0007646007,0.058610704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50903475,0.009890608,0.42172477,0.00520846,0.00047470216,0.04019026,0.00038919115,0.0002815378,0.012805682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9037518,0.08278651,0.0045522433,0.003003823,0.003903503,0.0020021228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89122593,0.08426049,0.0032403804,0.0057411296,0.010905119,0.004626858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1127925,0.0011075177,0.0007314668,0.0021663257,0.019589534,0.006752421,0.004138914,0.004859799,0.0036971013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06401464,0.0017760221,0.0007793827,0.0038554843,0.007824313,0.008659597,0.008732505,0.007903735,0.001104312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028242075,0.0012018918,0.0018841207,0.0018471357,0.000011773458,0.0065337433,0.89962626,0.00034277784,0.010853938,0.012227875,0.004244436,0.060943674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018762148,0.0012716703,0.0029353022,0.0028153476,0.00002530782,0.0028981795,0.8804972,0.0010755548,0.008507449,0.0054030144,0.09426188,0.000121465724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056535034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01119238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080852015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020553537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003330906","doi":"10.1177/1468794113495037","title":"The commonplace journey methodology: exploring outdoor recreation activities through theoretically-informed reflective practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Outdoor and Experiential Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Existentialism; Sociology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Lived experience; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7039338883095084,"score_gpt":0.6823557642623752,"score_spread":0.021578124047133218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003330906","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15142123,0.0026923416,0.7121767,0.010882931,0.0005285897,0.0031719373,0.00025598423,0.00035932392,0.11851098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6573888,0.0022211713,0.32563484,0.0009479772,0.000054172666,0.0035039522,0.00014549338,0.00020101268,0.00990256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97092336,0.024923865,0.0006004011,0.0011389905,0.0016957739,0.00071767956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97674143,0.016927117,0.0011191122,0.0027441536,0.0015596973,0.0009085473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026416479,0.0009276797,0.000622493,0.004856991,0.0055985516,0.010054433,0.003015831,0.0022399493,0.0036779095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025552994,0.00057427306,0.0009035867,0.0042292513,0.01941377,0.0120119555,0.009068499,0.0025969925,0.0006129906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047037673,0.00017344944,0.0026369654,0.0010039714,0.00002955914,0.0005047019,0.66089773,0.0007086216,0.0010062058,0.22479425,0.003364766,0.10483275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005760807,0.00020582216,0.001464323,0.0022575033,0.00003978034,0.0013159653,0.6853543,0.0021537591,0.0019581898,0.12192104,0.18319906,0.000072623894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026102592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057690027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026416479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009144395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13970536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005372738","doi":"10.1177/1468794106065005","title":"Expressions of personhood in Alzheimer’s: moving from ethnographic text to performing ethnography","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Canadian Nurses Foundation","keywords":"Personhood; Embodied cognition; Ethnography; Sociology; Immediacy; Appeal; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.8564210565874426,"score_gpt":0.7527300817271043,"score_spread":0.10369097486033829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005372738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79426837,0.006227648,0.10444074,0.017905846,0.00087699585,0.001003017,0.0002534849,0.00024667697,0.07477719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96383345,0.0035064328,0.026720079,0.0010195965,0.0002120331,0.0007058481,0.00008350403,0.00012291774,0.0037960939],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529843,0.042472735,0.0008209242,0.0010547381,0.0016338922,0.0010334718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481593,0.046818215,0.0014304471,0.0019451047,0.00096511375,0.0006817682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03306311,0.0010109055,0.00086477667,0.0042734966,0.008853082,0.012324335,0.0020275349,0.0022096403,0.0022539673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034973614,0.000693392,0.0005335934,0.003317404,0.042904858,0.015238122,0.012356235,0.0034011593,0.000354459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014111555,0.00001658103,0.0004298195,0.00011494116,0.0000034163907,0.00028867784,0.9794429,0.0000723242,0.00055018865,0.011708261,0.0002978409,0.0070609683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011330058,0.00005149059,0.0008253212,0.0006011826,0.0000106586995,0.0004984587,0.95909935,0.00021693799,0.00085066794,0.012324336,0.02547925,0.000030890187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00446656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03306311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031514077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027919689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17485654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013537486","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446104","title":"‘If you can call it a poem’: toward a framework for the assessment of arts-based works","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Performative utterance; Sociology; Arts in education; Normative; Visual arts; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.9252908332090877,"score_gpt":0.8223612904170058,"score_spread":0.10292954279208189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013537486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053390138,0.017723093,0.70222646,0.06650698,0.0011124825,0.0073147085,0.0005729139,0.0007820849,0.15037109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36739537,0.003461033,0.61965096,0.0015441697,0.00011888602,0.004860065,0.00024417113,0.00013717955,0.0025882514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8156673,0.15091597,0.011310428,0.0046744375,0.01573668,0.0016951725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8231428,0.12346671,0.010726441,0.0110733425,0.028629256,0.0029614195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20364656,0.0022374121,0.0017849061,0.036278695,0.009762989,0.024769634,0.007263754,0.004700886,0.0027483746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18436953,0.001502661,0.0019857972,0.013553279,0.067469485,0.030606844,0.014131958,0.0067142285,0.00058874174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056440775,0.00007974088,0.0037513014,0.0031827076,0.00009194607,0.00016456492,0.2478842,0.000920821,0.00078575144,0.63973176,0.0032608022,0.10008994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059422655,0.0001674164,0.0043773586,0.0102824485,0.00015672501,0.00058299856,0.21618427,0.004021177,0.0012820222,0.61962694,0.14310937,0.00014984643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010086781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013247359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79635346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019446174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026441239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017795280","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076021","title":"Nostalgia, goodness and ethical paradox","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Sociology; Aesthetics; Construct (python library); Power (physics); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.370335316527473,"score_gpt":0.6624588903577446,"score_spread":0.29212357383027165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017795280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691276,0.0021153882,0.0027837937,0.04438834,0.00015661714,0.00011569101,0.000078860714,0.000015206015,0.0812185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918161,0.0007147138,0.0005673597,0.0030419284,0.000009626141,0.000048786565,0.000012377313,0.0000071550553,0.0037821091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98239535,0.014704952,0.00025369198,0.0006385959,0.00089802,0.0011094192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838636,0.01099221,0.0011754575,0.00093082647,0.0015994058,0.0014385122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010256731,0.00026811194,0.0004079951,0.0014595232,0.020960184,0.0065594036,0.0010017281,0.0018231934,0.0030376634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014858281,0.00028816817,0.00018167672,0.0028892967,0.05747367,0.0043140077,0.0062894397,0.004407116,0.00026014974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006124563,0.00009215828,0.011000725,0.000139317,0.00001720254,0.00077975885,0.7318814,0.0002097374,0.0010410575,0.239457,0.004638385,0.010682034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615968,0.000046593286,0.008605393,0.0003395031,0.00001086095,0.00017735391,0.8786082,0.00019429927,0.0005278575,0.047806796,0.06360626,0.00005070872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29662192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48249623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29662192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028337233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028714783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58979076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017994899","doi":"10.1177/1468794105056924","title":"Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1012,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Focus group; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12380968316149689,"score_gpt":0.5506791787967483,"score_spread":0.42686949563525145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017994899","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019448288,0.7457168,0.026029551,0.1187805,0.009625961,0.0004912276,0.0001849005,0.00013484395,0.07958792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24570817,0.63134694,0.040559944,0.041667704,0.0064830226,0.0012323252,0.000287561,0.00038774352,0.03232662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653396,0.024266925,0.0019048222,0.0018193352,0.005850414,0.00081883825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9257613,0.05407031,0.0028668898,0.003614651,0.0113628,0.0023240484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05389169,0.0009334939,0.0009893785,0.0069450317,0.0063628773,0.011477813,0.0017113122,0.00413546,0.0052420907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06504068,0.00089191925,0.0005198591,0.006593528,0.02988184,0.012414031,0.008170905,0.008093994,0.0011530047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029824025,0.00019443182,0.002820794,0.003320641,0.000041036597,0.00037562195,0.11141896,0.00027827246,0.0009539252,0.25302476,0.046159767,0.5811135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016398308,0.00008019967,0.0026112583,0.0104961945,0.000012251186,0.00034661856,0.019261392,0.00009633686,0.00067608623,0.02657123,0.93977255,0.000059453327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012945271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016670762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94610834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022774825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019052478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28500992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020575600","doi":"10.1177/1468794103033007","title":"&amp;lsquo;Giving Voice&amp;rsquo; to Students: Using the Internet for Data Collection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Data collection; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Ethnic group; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.927024663724717,"score_gpt":0.760420218698501,"score_spread":0.16660444502621607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020575600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9471142,0.00042057384,0.031873185,0.0050308933,0.00011801073,0.0042079086,0.00027980396,0.0001338727,0.010821464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92042077,0.001731028,0.06360584,0.001422131,0.00010727762,0.00953904,0.00026495868,0.00007288463,0.002836094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608093,0.033637304,0.0018144323,0.00062249176,0.0021076659,0.0010088257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94779176,0.035995983,0.0039185584,0.003736961,0.0057935235,0.0027631805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033321515,0.00034159175,0.00038109877,0.00219239,0.0039138123,0.0054972745,0.0009867713,0.0008057703,0.0025974235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06937849,0.0007612885,0.00025568274,0.0024093313,0.0021919068,0.0041961283,0.0037432967,0.0017075002,0.0014708632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022812562,0.0016115253,0.24802391,0.00085970794,0.00003674079,0.00068205496,0.25277615,0.00030411832,0.0042937384,0.0028427823,0.0068664374,0.4814748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017116342,0.0028260192,0.13857676,0.0022112096,0.00011235377,0.0011777938,0.72945094,0.003350394,0.011557328,0.004699195,0.10566341,0.00020342584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033790285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008101605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016023185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006134777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1762231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029413296","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337877","title":"The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Visual research; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Psychology; Point (geometry); Value (mathematics); Representation (politics); Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Geography; Political science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.8454495203515204,"score_gpt":0.8040831670268701,"score_spread":0.04136635332465033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029413296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50035435,0.0022287904,0.37600774,0.014221529,0.0012875658,0.007719823,0.00023498246,0.00056883984,0.097376436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90427446,0.00047061566,0.08328706,0.0014444441,0.00020564381,0.00816837,0.000074441195,0.00032247644,0.0017523555],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.53247404,0.41956615,0.0097832205,0.010815722,0.024318835,0.0030420257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36766827,0.51984364,0.023035482,0.050363168,0.036016375,0.0030730453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30438098,0.0011900704,0.0015967756,0.011324341,0.013756003,0.014931486,0.0044531925,0.0038613013,0.0043399623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52807665,0.0018839217,0.0015343196,0.0053314012,0.04112648,0.020133233,0.027186342,0.004997526,0.00094836374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036557144,0.00015211829,0.010331641,0.0015799414,0.000081642866,0.00041696473,0.8438961,0.00040529994,0.0028045687,0.04396252,0.0013769524,0.09462674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065175723,0.001415029,0.015769789,0.008575112,0.00034402002,0.0018725791,0.66077495,0.008761286,0.014904849,0.1949018,0.09159235,0.00043652294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002687593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021699478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30438098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007150531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083258785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85782206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043162520","doi":"10.1177/1468794108099320","title":"Multiple text analysis in narrative research: visual, written, and spoken stories of experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Construct (python library); Reading (process); Narrative network; Narrative inquiry; Narrative criticism; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5614235798992749,"score_gpt":0.6945102678409579,"score_spread":0.133086687941683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043162520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3400343,0.017381161,0.47806692,0.013025168,0.0015122175,0.005543269,0.0013232614,0.00073424546,0.14237954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7060335,0.004766862,0.27585548,0.0007242962,0.00028989968,0.005584204,0.00037952454,0.00030801943,0.006058186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93850833,0.054804455,0.0015193636,0.001450411,0.0032363157,0.0004812001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8504417,0.13220915,0.0056677153,0.005490722,0.004740956,0.0014497974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0353158,0.001001014,0.0008315152,0.008749825,0.0058175493,0.014701562,0.00171766,0.0020310886,0.004701832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09561847,0.0008050304,0.00082319387,0.00894704,0.012640009,0.017502489,0.008532777,0.002081133,0.0006036691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015801202,0.00008388554,0.0026278337,0.0020261977,0.0000610463,0.0005419214,0.8233818,0.00039831686,0.0021670917,0.056069255,0.0028107197,0.109673895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010799207,0.00030373514,0.0045860293,0.006506554,0.00011822349,0.0023795627,0.7654048,0.004657887,0.0065083574,0.095393516,0.11381989,0.00021339551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001384643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025825447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0353158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003483032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00340033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18677002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045612295","doi":"10.1177/1468794111433089","title":"Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participant observation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Qualitative research; Distancing; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.7126574550515453,"score_gpt":0.634758587860571,"score_spread":0.07789886719097427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045612295","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029872123,0.0073617427,0.86354274,0.07404167,0.001993467,0.0063225445,0.00010847542,0.0006636729,0.016093472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17219871,0.0037287553,0.7878979,0.009503811,0.0004533891,0.024111671,0.000056358633,0.00034798123,0.00170143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.21521287,0.7482675,0.013392315,0.00774,0.013460305,0.0019270637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36916927,0.55627185,0.015756937,0.031785745,0.02282943,0.0041867397],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.58943427,0.0027503541,0.0031240259,0.0067034983,0.012428226,0.019533165,0.01161318,0.014636211,0.0051760823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.509804,0.0039864825,0.00300794,0.00442805,0.05386046,0.043428052,0.020145467,0.011789015,0.002209544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003706826,0.00016910274,0.0023471424,0.007035353,0.00021296297,0.00066959806,0.71723044,0.0007558673,0.0040075188,0.107403256,0.005388793,0.15440938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076994114,0.0011924064,0.0023788686,0.019423038,0.0004968602,0.002858752,0.29250255,0.0058304295,0.011874233,0.407385,0.254628,0.00065992895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022843056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036986978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41056573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010179752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014719835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5063007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048310586","doi":"10.1177/1468794103003001770","title":"Exposing failures, unsettling accommodations: tensions in interview practice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Conceptualization; Vulnerability (computing); Qualitative research; Sociology; Power (physics); Semi-structured interview; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8056848262636709,"score_gpt":0.7474369098650276,"score_spread":0.05824791639864324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048310586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64361703,0.004785578,0.21599922,0.06449212,0.0010933008,0.0012172307,0.00010445877,0.00052247173,0.06816851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97997594,0.0008028519,0.013680299,0.0018238545,0.00015596833,0.000871112,0.00003605951,0.00017969246,0.0024742237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.500166,0.45177418,0.009804246,0.010980518,0.020326871,0.00694819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67242545,0.28513342,0.014222069,0.013805197,0.009873762,0.004540046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23355609,0.0016449303,0.0020907412,0.0072224652,0.028653616,0.025253842,0.006410675,0.007412617,0.002695794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31692314,0.0027228466,0.0014072158,0.00600419,0.095966734,0.031861488,0.037406325,0.010172994,0.00073475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022806478,0.000008569551,0.00048141312,0.000116678835,0.000010176138,0.00033493715,0.9754566,0.00007113705,0.00024122362,0.018924523,0.0003346415,0.0039972146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017268943,0.000035140325,0.00035910332,0.0004742603,0.000012583352,0.00070890295,0.9308212,0.0005397425,0.0003187433,0.048974875,0.017695075,0.000043046246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002511209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024106002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010381709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008460291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050898615","doi":"10.1177/1468794113509261","title":"Advocating beyond the academy: dilemmas of communicating relevant research results","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Sociology; Public relations; Participatory action research; Indigenous; Citizen journalism; Work (physics); Community-based participatory research; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.775037321702685,"score_gpt":0.7288378966725597,"score_spread":0.04619942503012531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050898615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24391681,0.010132161,0.08036332,0.56695443,0.002895928,0.0010268923,0.00006311107,0.0002659803,0.094381414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94278395,0.003283756,0.02389814,0.022694182,0.00065461325,0.001127806,0.00002159646,0.00022847342,0.005307277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.40668318,0.5354655,0.014572205,0.007893191,0.025722208,0.009663666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38870484,0.5386719,0.017994706,0.019903783,0.021967657,0.012757072],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.41475782,0.001062769,0.0018631251,0.0050296807,0.055149347,0.04453332,0.0074727326,0.015764905,0.0031601666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44576088,0.0019692304,0.0014402041,0.005113319,0.1141583,0.035325475,0.04063056,0.020815007,0.0010123131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002739791,0.00003460056,0.0009732174,0.00040110073,0.000024605815,0.0012015328,0.9210457,0.00012543946,0.00026640535,0.05841771,0.0022641527,0.015218115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020837337,0.000049321763,0.00037151406,0.0015890945,0.00002878247,0.00093586126,0.8766869,0.0003489436,0.00042734182,0.06838247,0.05109413,0.00006482482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013451991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012810596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016657783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0558529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7217078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052860698","doi":"10.1177/1468794107082305","title":"Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary research team","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Sociology; Identity (music); Politics; Socialization; Ideology; Qualitative research; Narrative; Power (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.7115118991827734,"score_gpt":0.7857387431437663,"score_spread":0.074226843960993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052860698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72141683,0.002828538,0.119223066,0.066258684,0.0010834556,0.0005558222,0.000031931322,0.00008357048,0.08851822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848663,0.00041377786,0.010043574,0.0014458541,0.00007464437,0.00025444778,0.000009217187,0.000034173707,0.0028578294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7169187,0.26046342,0.002362106,0.0050145974,0.0093526635,0.005888417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8814588,0.0928216,0.007937249,0.004407274,0.0053815776,0.007993523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12531863,0.00048086874,0.0010070436,0.0031919472,0.036967374,0.028237702,0.0029961045,0.005648675,0.002262924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090993494,0.0009834194,0.0008048935,0.0018422331,0.07160375,0.018915283,0.024635075,0.0074937735,0.00048597183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041292453,0.00005317835,0.0022650352,0.000081779646,0.000026962254,0.0006894596,0.89497435,0.00031190235,0.0004729278,0.092526644,0.000942652,0.007613696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037754035,0.00006806409,0.00067553506,0.00026801112,0.000021465408,0.00043658938,0.8901546,0.0010218209,0.00050903775,0.06683764,0.039921574,0.00004789724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030608037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025304384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008501904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01651077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279737","doi":"10.1177/1468794110394068","title":"Communication technologies for focus groups with remote communities: a case study of research with First Nations in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Participatory action research; Qualitative research; Citizen journalism; Videoconferencing; Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Political science; Multimedia; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.6043639673826666,"score_gpt":0.600795378554305,"score_spread":0.0035685888283616407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967659,0.0019072521,0.0033195475,0.0056072525,0.00012558122,0.0025311543,0.00022738129,0.000045361947,0.01857737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787556,0.0019432834,0.0068361154,0.0014408302,0.000027182736,0.0009360259,0.00010403764,0.00004483035,0.009912059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864827,0.007231587,0.00032273904,0.00090501196,0.0015708008,0.0034872226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828215,0.008785522,0.00075612956,0.00057557406,0.0026652527,0.00439591],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012138166,0.0010457354,0.0009971287,0.0022348992,0.06067302,0.0051295683,0.004538802,0.0045426795,0.0035755392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016192371,0.0009128251,0.00087852776,0.004432096,0.011853232,0.0019776216,0.005985046,0.003108475,0.00035369172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011904288,0.00029048187,0.006118886,0.0004097252,0.000016744652,0.010008603,0.9653545,0.00021212017,0.0014686831,0.0021669928,0.0014173533,0.012416917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024095732,0.00014053167,0.0055912333,0.00031423118,0.000021529784,0.0009744898,0.9727285,0.00022032984,0.0006763828,0.0003527707,0.018909711,0.00004630616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9384571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97889143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0767818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117811516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55709356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053888554","doi":"10.1177/1468794109348680","title":"Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnography; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Institution; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Narrative inquiry; Engineering ethics; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6951726244112297,"score_gpt":0.6988167302744593,"score_spread":0.0036441058632296075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053888554","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06652137,0.02539935,0.516251,0.13984722,0.0032085946,0.0037977756,0.0002250029,0.00036474742,0.24438493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80623823,0.0045253625,0.16027275,0.011044377,0.0009612296,0.009160491,0.000080736376,0.0001942301,0.0075226417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5546737,0.41510943,0.0065710195,0.008664242,0.012119221,0.002862377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46588382,0.46351928,0.016582528,0.03711994,0.012925087,0.0039693676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28640592,0.0024163118,0.0020644355,0.010535776,0.012264787,0.024667447,0.00695953,0.009064455,0.0048050415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25204733,0.0021618456,0.0015461389,0.006369498,0.09496849,0.05304441,0.025027294,0.0086293,0.0005335786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007386188,0.000052173316,0.001332669,0.0007140104,0.000104973995,0.0002342797,0.116176955,0.00033145054,0.00009093453,0.864601,0.0012850016,0.015002683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019043627,0.00017187756,0.0012647527,0.005775914,0.00012082906,0.00073941844,0.106725074,0.0030715694,0.00062500185,0.7831517,0.098051995,0.00011141149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006351194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005697141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7135941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015804939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015334847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87998855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063123176","doi":"10.1177/1468794112446105","title":"Storytelling in a digital age: digital storytelling as an emerging narrative method for preserving and promoting indigenous oral wisdom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Indigenous; Digital storytelling; Narrative; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Pedagogy; Ecology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.34966023256063744,"score_gpt":0.6162015810418132,"score_spread":0.2665413484811758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063123176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42017704,0.0047120233,0.33760568,0.010978294,0.0008515992,0.0028824755,0.00033345172,0.00039038964,0.22206897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72587293,0.003128815,0.24502024,0.0011145558,0.00015259566,0.0025106817,0.00013400592,0.00015294254,0.021913342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916323,0.0071263807,0.00020403902,0.00030405496,0.00052624993,0.0002069354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900865,0.007415252,0.00043775572,0.0010563277,0.0005028385,0.0005013149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115665365,0.00057297153,0.00029365296,0.0024467271,0.0048133032,0.006062746,0.0015304128,0.0009837933,0.0064502107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011316437,0.00029920787,0.00044099643,0.0013538355,0.009695753,0.00621821,0.008217894,0.0016051312,0.0007430263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006466134,0.00015491729,0.00201254,0.0009926566,0.000020078889,0.00061513745,0.77272695,0.00030698572,0.0035214974,0.07049808,0.002460009,0.14662643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006203172,0.0002453306,0.002551805,0.0015038587,0.000056912973,0.0016369176,0.61411446,0.0010024109,0.0067992993,0.040328126,0.33161482,0.00008397927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011520896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040070396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115665365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001724437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028267791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0611704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063288048","doi":"10.1177/1468794113481795","title":"Popularizing ethnography: reflections on writing for popular audiences in magazines and blogs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Media studies; Popular media; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7688613729027349,"score_gpt":0.7343597915147355,"score_spread":0.034501581387999414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063288048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93028474,0.002418799,0.009823866,0.015881142,0.00095722027,0.00068942073,0.00025546926,0.00019023557,0.03949922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98035216,0.0020916816,0.0028956553,0.0033200593,0.00043100741,0.0006843363,0.00012407781,0.00042150845,0.009679512],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9291283,0.060255483,0.0012443113,0.0020625968,0.002849235,0.004460142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86012435,0.1246025,0.0043638675,0.0032871226,0.004227142,0.0033949977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04563214,0.002491104,0.0016900308,0.0058064978,0.032945026,0.016134271,0.004610181,0.0066699106,0.0051944316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086440675,0.0026626685,0.0012271059,0.004897166,0.04070434,0.018755963,0.018682767,0.010690796,0.0013799486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016041293,0.000021320542,0.00035284317,0.000060474922,0.0000035910407,0.00049515266,0.99617636,0.000013605359,0.00032191203,0.0007283581,0.00045231314,0.0013580717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055566125,0.000028055578,0.00033914487,0.0001528844,0.0000058476494,0.00021749178,0.99047476,0.000031986707,0.00031009488,0.00039545164,0.008025844,0.000012902716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065980745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013847608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008640583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052439435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24132872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063364875","doi":"10.1177/1468794104041106","title":"What’s So Funny?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Solidarity; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social justice; Gender studies; Social solidarity; Epistemology; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.5065192918331807,"score_gpt":0.686000224803707,"score_spread":0.17948093297052636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063364875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1254008,0.067330286,0.015657347,0.51033425,0.034606714,0.00014328393,0.00021414254,0.0005416186,0.2457716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74416834,0.02804461,0.009424462,0.12069882,0.009780092,0.00022284641,0.00017228449,0.00064228964,0.08684624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940352,0.0041173776,0.00010676579,0.00032536007,0.0007676661,0.00064774236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407554,0.0022918868,0.00069519493,0.00037638462,0.0010348095,0.0015262796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003801584,0.0006261399,0.0008002071,0.0011745833,0.01075142,0.00916136,0.00084702484,0.0035300846,0.007035854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016621774,0.00027450413,0.00069083145,0.0010672788,0.015677279,0.012452502,0.004371249,0.0052975714,0.0027832293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002999093,0.00020368308,0.013205338,0.0013431929,0.00021393492,0.0023969552,0.36120227,0.00016280636,0.0026551592,0.10117429,0.26243123,0.25471127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014169128,0.00012232941,0.002908882,0.0015196798,0.000040483905,0.002675393,0.22951254,0.00012974755,0.0007987568,0.040765822,0.72142166,0.00009054833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015979322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035717257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013780895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016220247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023537278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108368184","doi":"10.1177/1468794115569561","title":"Men can change: transformation, agency, ethics and closure during critical dialogue in interviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Compassion; CONTEST; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Distancing; Social psychology; Closure (psychology); Friendship; Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.8588660113801196,"score_gpt":0.7283389263296247,"score_spread":0.13052708505049493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108368184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81528264,0.0057905717,0.037555292,0.03909145,0.0009982407,0.001754532,0.00019895895,0.0002064742,0.09912189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892075,0.00080044224,0.0036791929,0.0013163771,0.000075005584,0.0004872017,0.000024408128,0.00006310877,0.004346755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8802306,0.10874533,0.0015644251,0.0020523188,0.0032724058,0.0041350108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91230935,0.075719476,0.00415508,0.002324837,0.0025248975,0.002966329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05692563,0.0012901464,0.0011435982,0.002906601,0.02192229,0.017171115,0.0031206687,0.004125032,0.0034811872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06545743,0.0013417987,0.0008283889,0.0025668982,0.058243122,0.016844962,0.013910363,0.007870003,0.00045186252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011293067,0.00000518802,0.00013514284,0.000032788364,0.0000022203694,0.00019943203,0.99452066,0.00001775265,0.00010655167,0.0038548897,0.00021112207,0.0009028347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048666975,0.00001561047,0.00020615739,0.00016653663,0.000004095556,0.0002458927,0.98096436,0.00007031954,0.00022719093,0.003580624,0.014501901,0.000012543199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005054943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007875265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05692563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00968786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009454403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30105507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109319812","doi":"10.1177/1468794105048658","title":"Fear of offending: disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Psychology; Content analysis; Focus group; Constructivist grounded theory; Social psychology; Participant observation; Qualitative research; Sociology; Grounded theory; Social science","score_opus":0.7134932883470805,"score_gpt":0.7306789638120522,"score_spread":0.01718567546497174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109319812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60930246,0.0056990604,0.24057202,0.08718603,0.004491917,0.0022692725,0.00032658328,0.0011979867,0.04895464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94323814,0.0018167443,0.032052387,0.01280234,0.00086119043,0.0031507558,0.00011313859,0.00039451887,0.005570919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6239647,0.3326717,0.0131830005,0.0063694213,0.019119319,0.004691852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57297647,0.3550628,0.029177379,0.02759736,0.011504089,0.003681868],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17010954,0.0016033616,0.0015534719,0.0029680566,0.013381665,0.014651609,0.0034176917,0.007987651,0.0036858108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3757397,0.0015423291,0.0017148507,0.0022284247,0.022009354,0.011742414,0.017603382,0.0090257665,0.0014903147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012872466,0.00004310811,0.002842597,0.00050900783,0.000052195996,0.0024211702,0.95593494,0.00015134817,0.0030996369,0.014169393,0.002587365,0.018060481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000485148,0.00032455253,0.0023382073,0.0017377647,0.00009380323,0.010412974,0.88125545,0.0016515478,0.0041408082,0.031635597,0.06620109,0.00015967563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010058853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010652969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8298905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038575763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052107717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116918702","doi":"10.1177/1468794107076023","title":"Learning in focus groups","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Moderation; Focus (optics); Data collection; Empirical research; Psychology; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.4244514128753006,"score_gpt":0.6660440278786938,"score_spread":0.24159261500339319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116918702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048009813,0.0017354165,0.8488237,0.0048488397,0.0012737035,0.017614296,0.0006935032,0.0010089526,0.07599175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24369001,0.0015806528,0.67159724,0.0040736683,0.0007292597,0.044259183,0.00084602257,0.00034757654,0.032876454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8956745,0.09086377,0.0020297884,0.0051895007,0.0047270935,0.0015154327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88197833,0.09756936,0.0041594924,0.008888507,0.0052551837,0.0021490874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.071147434,0.0014233285,0.0012281014,0.003970276,0.0056835245,0.0057649426,0.0034929449,0.0041502207,0.023612648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103866756,0.0012523255,0.0010898536,0.0027888797,0.007017811,0.0084883,0.013235495,0.0029270102,0.0065043587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095575914,0.00082027994,0.0033598924,0.003122994,0.00012684679,0.00088224706,0.35506573,0.0023085983,0.010109674,0.19023621,0.028536705,0.40447518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093178166,0.001502032,0.0028457534,0.002337529,0.00013393792,0.0017584641,0.063351944,0.005593618,0.014528195,0.27990106,0.6268614,0.00025431233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006305333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088402664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071147434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028371396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033135172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3762681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119068251","doi":"10.1177/1468794114548945","title":"Five stories of accidental ethnography: turning unplanned moments in the field into data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; National Council for Eurasian and East European Research; Russell Sage Foundation; Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars","keywords":"Ethnography; Accidental; Notice; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Participant observation; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Qualitative research; Politics; Everyday life; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology; History; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.3221945454977697,"score_gpt":0.6206663579474165,"score_spread":0.2984718124496468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119068251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378947,0.0058283648,0.09040564,0.02062588,0.0007952922,0.0008934499,0.00072543987,0.00037970024,0.042451408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98373485,0.0013403853,0.010686509,0.00093539985,0.00010106307,0.000372043,0.00011971724,0.00008309901,0.002626931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9513331,0.04294073,0.0010081418,0.0010682646,0.0020623778,0.0015872811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421674,0.045684256,0.0040922426,0.0037762637,0.002138334,0.0021415628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020510744,0.0013845111,0.0007300618,0.0030413582,0.012065165,0.0077563217,0.0020584555,0.0028101718,0.0021156683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041708197,0.0013064469,0.00081754243,0.0024796133,0.025339143,0.012337193,0.012691278,0.0045217215,0.00041876416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006886441,0.00001554294,0.0021662454,0.00018344814,0.000012908143,0.0012761136,0.97681004,0.000085522704,0.00055072433,0.010393546,0.0013005253,0.0071365265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010529147,0.000070426555,0.0019859723,0.00052887585,0.000016140542,0.0013833547,0.9304867,0.0003149696,0.0011359957,0.007421153,0.05660268,0.00004316728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033836097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068038767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020510744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003661878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018528264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108472526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124352716","doi":"10.1177/1468794114538897","title":"Catching the shimmers of the social: from the limits of reflexivity to methodological creativity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Participatory action research; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Creativity; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Social research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9741345824231714,"score_gpt":0.8375044618927163,"score_spread":0.1366301205304551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124352716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15432538,0.025907489,0.47304568,0.24840854,0.0021769623,0.0015568921,0.00015531025,0.00046135279,0.09396241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137113,0.004252437,0.06840636,0.008487956,0.0006273949,0.0015100143,0.00003225913,0.00028771342,0.0026844875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.46790025,0.4859879,0.008391641,0.010570025,0.023631627,0.0035185074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44075215,0.4909089,0.013299961,0.03976632,0.012191538,0.0030811478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.35818994,0.0013754023,0.0022203648,0.007760565,0.015652662,0.033017978,0.005232323,0.005963567,0.002652271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36174104,0.002087261,0.0015546748,0.0044338643,0.21011303,0.040383942,0.03130001,0.01313535,0.00060057704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008919881,0.000041200943,0.0014998995,0.0010532896,0.00009910568,0.0003367291,0.49556088,0.0005163478,0.00066690554,0.46461424,0.0016863992,0.033835776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000924954,0.00008962824,0.0006469754,0.003189249,0.00004995247,0.00032404027,0.15126579,0.0011885606,0.0011711973,0.80157506,0.040294487,0.00011257564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067500356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005957236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35818994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012283182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02321406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2130133015","doi":"10.1177/1468794110380525","title":"Interviews as encounters: issues of sexuality and reflexivity when men interview men about commercial same sex relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Respondent; Human sexuality; Interview; Sexualization; Gender studies; Sociology; Qualitative research; Queer; Conversation; Focus group; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.6093595537735169,"score_gpt":0.7057991561710943,"score_spread":0.09643960239757743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130133015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77557606,0.014307723,0.07818896,0.035217144,0.0010022374,0.001642939,0.00041606533,0.00022740335,0.09342146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97987515,0.0025299024,0.0066808094,0.0027282133,0.00017573226,0.0010505484,0.000062773746,0.00012070888,0.0067763035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7863824,0.19398533,0.0039595463,0.0042962437,0.0065785833,0.004797939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8398288,0.14154531,0.008155135,0.0039373,0.004480889,0.002052653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091286846,0.0010101368,0.0016433672,0.00408447,0.022554696,0.019624606,0.003506588,0.005102146,0.004385796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10998627,0.0020944881,0.0007968074,0.0050892346,0.053833615,0.017791243,0.014939653,0.0059990673,0.00085637876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012733816,0.000003051491,0.0002565605,0.000063473744,0.0000035220357,0.00013963672,0.99378854,0.000010317156,0.00013127053,0.0044100205,0.000121023586,0.0010599216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006336461,0.000018291372,0.00032264678,0.00029389653,0.0000052667096,0.00025980093,0.9804175,0.000051049643,0.00035402612,0.0040055,0.014252845,0.000012910807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007112416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008526124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90871316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007856446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006588995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48277676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139378737","doi":"10.1177/1468794108093898","title":"Dynamics of the `field': multiple standpoints, narrative and shifting positionality in multisited research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Crafts, Textile, and Design","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Gender studies; Narrative; Subjectivity; CONTEST; Power (physics); Social science; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.36275277847338033,"score_gpt":0.511294056283965,"score_spread":0.14854127781058463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139378737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8058122,0.0037140865,0.03176664,0.020403061,0.00033252305,0.0002292683,0.00011474052,0.00011016687,0.13751733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940148,0.00035996412,0.0019333063,0.0003084697,0.000033443583,0.000071575436,0.000015085896,0.000029528697,0.0032339203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707654,0.025170155,0.00034013705,0.0010655097,0.0014940753,0.0011647244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945053,0.025200155,0.0012109159,0.0019061604,0.00096052786,0.0012717223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023069117,0.00061652955,0.0007757195,0.004750206,0.020782169,0.018488223,0.0026368732,0.0027115934,0.003650969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018359683,0.0008352765,0.00042382962,0.0042983163,0.08820149,0.016504088,0.015641248,0.004064231,0.0002583013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001773747,0.000012037168,0.00077578734,0.0000577366,0.0000036927802,0.0003422079,0.92905277,0.000045973324,0.00023578884,0.06523832,0.00034250368,0.0038754982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007496271,0.000022957433,0.00074903225,0.00014971626,0.0000063238153,0.0003100723,0.95419466,0.00014496612,0.00025911684,0.019828,0.024310632,0.000017011613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003989022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007567179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007683367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041470686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1220026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139498372","doi":"10.1177/1468794109337880","title":"Preliminary field-work: methodological reflections from northern Canadian research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Field research; Research ethics; Creativity; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8558503893335307,"score_gpt":0.7424642321071072,"score_spread":0.11338615722642353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139498372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7687241,0.01570557,0.028739056,0.069632314,0.0019933886,0.00883227,0.00094382226,0.00035533166,0.10507405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94449073,0.0030216174,0.021278132,0.0077812686,0.0001110776,0.0030570459,0.00026158674,0.0002455522,0.019752864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8819929,0.082278654,0.003822111,0.007202722,0.010440385,0.014263238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84672314,0.09381858,0.0043201097,0.008233076,0.035325322,0.011579734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15756969,0.001639728,0.002002889,0.0057365065,0.07696153,0.019265158,0.008455944,0.004666101,0.0050114375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13057666,0.00185598,0.0010603252,0.008148198,0.063756846,0.007708596,0.016310494,0.0084194,0.00075302477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005722732,0.00003027546,0.0014100629,0.00030427382,0.0000046006758,0.00061076425,0.9825205,0.00005014214,0.00030597346,0.0076036616,0.0015104023,0.0055921655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008492685,0.000027351261,0.0014504918,0.0005339515,0.000006252875,0.00008535992,0.9714527,0.00005474623,0.00022666181,0.0017338612,0.02439387,0.0000261786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9017537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94767684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19187216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21933077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93731374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143472267","doi":"10.1177/1468794106093636","title":"What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Active listening; Epistemology; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.5654033162008418,"score_gpt":0.6453762317024662,"score_spread":0.07997291550162433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143472267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2586774,0.010898828,0.2511897,0.12919527,0.0037114471,0.0018651609,0.0005811823,0.0006464436,0.34323463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326347,0.003921481,0.031349827,0.0068815066,0.0004512118,0.0011396965,0.00016340842,0.00024616162,0.023212012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96155936,0.034829855,0.00068887643,0.0010479897,0.0013744123,0.00049951207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734234,0.021917205,0.0010325074,0.001384945,0.0012695002,0.000972371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01842217,0.0006691422,0.000838624,0.0017281865,0.0066975253,0.011839189,0.001676181,0.003856138,0.005713628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03739509,0.00045260054,0.00042915117,0.001612824,0.03167738,0.013228934,0.0061435984,0.0047991076,0.0013825413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004950128,0.000029559073,0.00040184025,0.00023702088,0.0000065062286,0.00077152,0.7594698,0.000093832714,0.000889514,0.22248204,0.002851898,0.0127168745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002739961,0.00009776711,0.0005040278,0.0011610663,0.000017699798,0.0011100266,0.5327702,0.00040219264,0.0019227873,0.15985967,0.30206302,0.00006413626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014842906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001160753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01842217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027591125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027522526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09742689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143692112","doi":"10.1177/1468794115569564","title":"Filtered meaning: appreciating linguistic skill, social position and subjectivity of interpreters in cross-language research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Subjectivity; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Fluency; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.6750878281009164,"score_gpt":0.7356350787654956,"score_spread":0.06054725066457922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143692112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602874,0.0013588358,0.009439773,0.0063578524,0.00016314548,0.00014418176,0.00002239297,0.000042438704,0.022183996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996837,0.00030908658,0.0014993493,0.00040498414,0.000019631989,0.0000752698,0.000007893268,0.00002907339,0.00081769266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9119083,0.07692546,0.0021278998,0.0021854592,0.0036833284,0.0031695305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073573,0.07596231,0.005311709,0.0041147624,0.0041856198,0.0030683803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.070664085,0.00089046004,0.0012303594,0.0047286674,0.018401746,0.020350812,0.0028706943,0.003347102,0.0022027998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105947696,0.0011248619,0.0007897523,0.0021573654,0.06265659,0.017408684,0.020895801,0.005413589,0.00030259465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006239302,0.000004414853,0.00073029444,0.000025180334,0.000002709887,0.00011631793,0.9965497,0.0000064120786,0.00009784337,0.0016204106,0.000035454603,0.0008050019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034620657,0.000019050154,0.0006333108,0.00015141373,0.000006851146,0.00021925475,0.9918467,0.000060223796,0.00017024358,0.004079569,0.0027974823,0.000012480524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005082086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004956732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005272766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008196352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37371188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163261691","doi":"10.1177/1468794113495038","title":"‘Emergent reconstruction’ in grounded theory: learning from team-based interview research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Sociology; Framing (construction); Constructivist grounded theory; Construct (python library); Solidarity; Premise; Population; Epistemology; Social constructionism; Psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.771834576379648,"score_gpt":0.6983268824887411,"score_spread":0.07350769389090694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163261691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017666614,0.00053326803,0.9617625,0.003751675,0.00025297457,0.0021839573,0.00022221674,0.0003429588,0.013283812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15543163,0.0006318923,0.8371298,0.00059363217,0.000056292873,0.0045702783,0.0004365072,0.00019415256,0.0009558888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8771243,0.10941804,0.0031520221,0.0037868966,0.005189261,0.0013294558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82862145,0.14520256,0.002427142,0.016581934,0.005762541,0.0014044555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11953235,0.0015195791,0.0017029333,0.006442377,0.005704971,0.014006946,0.006199708,0.0031953386,0.0038457173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12875706,0.0013583765,0.001980991,0.0056252596,0.032091383,0.011754035,0.013815666,0.0069020535,0.00097230717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007879209,0.0001485699,0.0013428631,0.002090775,0.00008610628,0.00080642814,0.4434749,0.0035116258,0.0013573479,0.41870597,0.0038636525,0.12453292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012307378,0.00014098562,0.00089187437,0.004989266,0.0000645281,0.0006827102,0.1375252,0.015050985,0.0019444581,0.7645807,0.07389856,0.00010762527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022194847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038314096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88046765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007952167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010234773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63215506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167996025","doi":"10.1177/1468794108093897","title":"Ethics policy as audit in Canadian clinical settings: exiling the ethnographic method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Audit; Meaning (existential); Research ethics; Informed consent; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Process (computing); Social science; Anthropology; Epistemology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.915368868469525,"score_gpt":0.8163960002943483,"score_spread":0.0989728681751767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167996025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23237762,0.030277798,0.18770717,0.22828063,0.0041943314,0.008074502,0.00047156715,0.00047144148,0.308145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91533905,0.0065030735,0.050752603,0.011105591,0.00025715417,0.0026318403,0.00006664473,0.00017431148,0.013169729],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6812348,0.2740573,0.0055801333,0.0068892967,0.02419095,0.008047593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7571394,0.17467234,0.009355438,0.01944792,0.0317707,0.0076142303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22935505,0.0011884142,0.0012958002,0.010845982,0.040562082,0.021923354,0.005379409,0.004165657,0.0029681174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19448212,0.0017905103,0.00047114718,0.013358786,0.092591785,0.012448921,0.019995924,0.0068540173,0.00034576195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007223359,0.000057986323,0.0047995253,0.0007317262,0.000019734951,0.0004816167,0.5853729,0.0006790518,0.00031381182,0.327084,0.008275436,0.072111994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011065101,0.00010197703,0.008761029,0.003514792,0.00005374934,0.00055708666,0.57849824,0.0029429232,0.0010470608,0.12619765,0.2779805,0.00023436784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89316326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9344605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16735333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3181459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9657521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268836053","doi":"10.1177/1468794115622529","title":"Watching the watchers: conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Covert; Secrecy; Ethnography; Law enforcement; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; State police; Symbol (formal); Reflexivity; Legislation; Participant observation; Deception; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.8909101175761514,"score_gpt":0.7009790939748612,"score_spread":0.1899310236012901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268836053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911795,0.0011889195,0.001671707,0.0014021406,0.000052910204,0.0004973192,0.00011665755,0.000015593536,0.0038752616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400145,0.0014866238,0.0015265631,0.00073676987,0.000024967925,0.0005067393,0.000065829416,0.0000370891,0.0016138388],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97480905,0.019967355,0.00096268655,0.0009950866,0.0010082241,0.0022576891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627752,0.027904514,0.0028637415,0.0017354618,0.0024039554,0.0023170605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121494755,0.0008222692,0.0012737638,0.0033739335,0.011883026,0.006411517,0.0023362937,0.0024192561,0.0038080434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030811638,0.0015517044,0.000489529,0.002607072,0.0144029055,0.0069065,0.0088541275,0.0034736556,0.00067611085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014795832,0.000023000594,0.0012396147,0.0000698806,0.0000018723234,0.00048625923,0.99646086,0.000013297398,0.000392254,0.00018153449,0.00014724206,0.0009694243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021968908,0.000035119494,0.0013690682,0.00013661754,0.0000025868276,0.0001374116,0.9955114,0.000031994812,0.00010687684,0.00006487696,0.0025940724,0.000007805876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05381965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100774676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05381965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074527487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053967065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10701281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299219954","doi":"10.1177/1468794116630040","title":"Arts-based health research and academic legitimacy: transcending hegemonic conventions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; Hospital for Sick Children; University of British Columbia; University Health Network; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Legitimacy; Openness to experience; The arts; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.7458826426879663,"score_gpt":0.7055587668032544,"score_spread":0.04032387588471198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299219954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086206,0.0072171604,0.06920871,0.14445366,0.00082743727,0.00081006426,0.00007613584,0.00013628272,0.46864983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.0005011157,0.0045969435,0.00095784554,0.000045306366,0.00007503579,0.0000073114975,0.000016531661,0.002834204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88467234,0.08790325,0.0024711888,0.003771924,0.014233483,0.006947896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8806172,0.09690692,0.0046103057,0.0072077666,0.0058567775,0.004800966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08840865,0.00080215774,0.0010779733,0.0073753353,0.03883954,0.025192525,0.0033988035,0.0058820583,0.0028863158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07145061,0.000703327,0.00055937044,0.005486245,0.22470812,0.012789038,0.020854186,0.008621202,0.00016253961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016180435,0.000017117445,0.0008001517,0.00007286687,0.000006948289,0.00029144203,0.41288236,0.0002758915,0.0001861775,0.57705593,0.00052473653,0.007870212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004399068,0.000058581874,0.002037996,0.0007489589,0.000026431122,0.00048057863,0.43009302,0.0014248408,0.0005877558,0.43030453,0.13408297,0.00011033404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30963835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35443515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07486262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10199524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6156721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310008377","doi":"10.1177/1468794115626244","title":"Enriching qualitative research by engaging peer interviewers: a case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Investment (military); Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Peer group; Public relations; Social psychology; Process (computing); Applied psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.9050232879490918,"score_gpt":0.7786427984073505,"score_spread":0.1263804895417413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310008377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86485755,0.00394931,0.080975406,0.017828617,0.0005851691,0.007650781,0.00023187423,0.00023263549,0.023688665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92204034,0.003364826,0.06138525,0.0027361023,0.00017691415,0.0043323045,0.00008119131,0.00012666185,0.00575624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9012236,0.089783385,0.0016657561,0.0016691735,0.0029251524,0.0027329903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9156118,0.07019274,0.0035644385,0.0028792184,0.0030681728,0.0046837125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06517741,0.0015255618,0.0012450194,0.0021388014,0.018136935,0.005724927,0.0054269433,0.0070529943,0.0027144486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054273304,0.0013426386,0.0011490958,0.0026899765,0.013474107,0.0066544516,0.010584696,0.006015091,0.0008575276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015832936,0.0005798284,0.002012953,0.00072158605,0.000020782338,0.0171133,0.94978654,0.00041027993,0.0022666727,0.0063729775,0.001627683,0.018929107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000939339,0.0008395209,0.0011460519,0.0014228203,0.000044236705,0.013391442,0.9197785,0.0015670581,0.0029173754,0.0047264076,0.053978477,0.00009426558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030575506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008102482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93482256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042238366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006074781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3446952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315425008","doi":"10.1177/1468794111399841","title":"Carrying my family with me: artifacts as emic perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Emic and etic; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.941550614149252,"score_gpt":0.791870571483774,"score_spread":0.14968004266547796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315425008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3451105,0.01077463,0.010954248,0.028798426,0.001579199,0.0001921315,0.00021185337,0.00017358725,0.6022054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95462817,0.0031458999,0.0026781366,0.0017707539,0.00013509998,0.00009937851,0.000057982674,0.00010974076,0.037374858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98807716,0.010241129,0.000121691875,0.00038535078,0.00056865707,0.00060601585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583983,0.0022562863,0.00035093995,0.0004826978,0.00032870308,0.0007415326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006378035,0.0009791324,0.00043679113,0.002050483,0.019983526,0.0130384015,0.0015036444,0.0020857886,0.008158348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008322564,0.00048021323,0.00034937763,0.0016841014,0.024925025,0.008226382,0.011984896,0.0042415126,0.001084621],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017751536,0.000019391813,0.0006100878,0.000058331185,0.0000048435445,0.00090510695,0.92724556,0.000039411385,0.00018371227,0.059414808,0.004389496,0.007111563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036846113,0.000017411587,0.00038363694,0.00025408654,0.0000057227953,0.000574749,0.7885429,0.000035182067,0.00019481234,0.0040865117,0.20589241,0.00000880852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038937647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00860035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019983526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004170888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002740199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033730686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318578413","doi":"10.1177/14687941110110020606","title":"Book review: MICHAEL PICKERING (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008. 240 pp (including index). ISBN 9780748625772 (hbk) US$110.00; ISBN 9780748625789 (pbk) US$36.00","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Index (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.561025670769544,"score_gpt":0.5839376888406713,"score_spread":0.022912018071127305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318578413","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054453427,0.9882018,0.00046067996,0.0039537074,0.0039137243,0.00006536038,0.0003452972,0.000056991157,0.0029479496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005984926,0.9802988,0.0011219453,0.0020010215,0.0017658961,0.00018732777,0.000536305,0.000056177487,0.013434012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979971,0.00056560006,0.00026816071,0.00019558305,0.00087109575,0.00010242568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98856413,0.0061852075,0.0012747255,0.00022883665,0.0033170048,0.0004300757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037160818,0.0028210618,0.0053210612,0.01071534,0.0010857519,0.003859961,0.0032273263,0.0026488448,0.040590234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011444274,0.0018721384,0.001426461,0.016891941,0.001311566,0.005335631,0.0017612701,0.0034698462,0.041564208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049060072,0.00001832145,0.000097210126,0.011438869,0.00006474448,0.00006654212,0.000202589,0.00010257315,0.00014268169,0.0005070836,0.8309101,0.15640032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035774825,0.000032324577,0.000656323,0.01515699,0.0001049515,0.00060587324,0.00023814553,0.00005767284,0.00012807328,0.0012834582,0.98166037,0.000040056544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015579272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030027125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040590234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031192314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006987095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13578784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392284092","doi":"10.1177/1468794115619002","title":"Queer de-participation: reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Queer; Participatory action research; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Narrative; Citizen journalism; Politics; Action research; Gender studies; Knowledge production; Unpacking; Feminism; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.8154885795801954,"score_gpt":0.7488891148639437,"score_spread":0.06659946471625167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392284092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31832516,0.011829237,0.22516418,0.12959823,0.0024924832,0.0011161646,0.00014012137,0.0005206689,0.31081372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578653,0.0020200335,0.018266596,0.00372165,0.00048808064,0.0006348415,0.00006062522,0.0003406652,0.016602118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8072323,0.16660374,0.002128419,0.0069323736,0.01217806,0.0049251225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.737703,0.2217056,0.008886107,0.017248292,0.008659929,0.0057970537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.120484635,0.0015879076,0.0015579602,0.006409968,0.025055682,0.027995607,0.0055640307,0.0069562322,0.004820842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1253614,0.0012400604,0.0011541542,0.004194889,0.12903486,0.0361966,0.03898904,0.011965933,0.0010659507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003482134,0.000024429739,0.00050250033,0.00014159095,0.000014539744,0.00049986364,0.8566251,0.00012951314,0.000579926,0.13135724,0.00095125777,0.009139267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045005,0.00008669746,0.0005366156,0.00064452144,0.000032715892,0.0009442534,0.54891646,0.0006531153,0.001626238,0.21661687,0.22982673,0.00007086846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047452585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007361765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107716955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018572008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6371913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2422566680","doi":"10.1177/1468794116652451","title":"Researching resilience: lessons learned from working with rural, Sesotho-speaking South African young people","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Inclusion (mineral); Psychological resilience; Sociology; Qualitative research; Poverty; Gender studies; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Economic growth; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.40133043441474625,"score_gpt":0.5923547926670147,"score_spread":0.1910243582522685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2422566680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56243587,0.060843352,0.03174108,0.30589423,0.0024856792,0.0016580878,0.00028909143,0.00010197147,0.034550674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281606,0.028936153,0.022771934,0.014362873,0.00034776967,0.001605608,0.00006613543,0.000070002854,0.0036788853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799748,0.016752765,0.00051750726,0.00067987596,0.0006156207,0.0014594117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95648915,0.035102945,0.0014040497,0.0012884039,0.0021809684,0.003534355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057771962,0.000902906,0.0012324731,0.0026894507,0.016554015,0.00987576,0.0028673413,0.0026824435,0.003634503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03492306,0.0008551828,0.0008253626,0.0031273523,0.02634481,0.01625245,0.016164873,0.0059172534,0.00039697916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016434957,0.00004746953,0.0035720675,0.0008223253,0.000017568706,0.0006722943,0.9702256,0.00006622259,0.0002604349,0.008117476,0.0014513686,0.014730691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005272349,0.0000356063,0.0019560442,0.0015426978,0.000012591649,0.00020131867,0.97521883,0.000056534253,0.00014230736,0.008365099,0.012449718,0.000013914403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046641085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104513355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057771962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008665985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028103257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30553102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532883782","doi":"10.1177/1468794116672914","title":"(Re)Grounding grounded theory: a close reading of theory in four schools","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Grounded theory; Focus group; Epistemology; Coding (social sciences); Phenomenon; Sociology; Axial coding; Focus (optics); Qualitative research; Process theory; Theoretical sampling; Social science","score_opus":0.5036375311519631,"score_gpt":0.6665039151524628,"score_spread":0.1628663840004997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532883782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06890376,0.02455125,0.37096256,0.32618576,0.004145867,0.0011869776,0.00019759784,0.00037562227,0.20349066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8303147,0.006239924,0.1401099,0.012804579,0.00062037556,0.0011991741,0.00014601089,0.00028602433,0.008279246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9312561,0.05441464,0.0028315485,0.0027926543,0.0070265327,0.0016784947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91343194,0.07274033,0.0020566145,0.0043911403,0.006007292,0.001372662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07786218,0.0010570217,0.002183856,0.013248305,0.014882533,0.028598737,0.005006197,0.011080742,0.0027667736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06236548,0.0011394037,0.0015131033,0.010112855,0.096447416,0.026190925,0.01320184,0.017607275,0.0005851447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015537134,0.000020838346,0.00013499393,0.00013957349,0.000010312149,0.00012480588,0.11810255,0.00015322687,0.000080626545,0.8696801,0.0017330777,0.00980436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020376476,0.000022472792,0.00019239282,0.00091056357,0.000012271682,0.00008361847,0.05349301,0.0008062608,0.00023814848,0.8910722,0.053127762,0.00002094213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007889637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068089887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032222208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016154844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41177946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551741184","doi":"10.1177/1468794116638829","title":"Alison I Griffith and Dorothy E Smith (eds), <i>Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-Line Work</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Front line; Ethnography; Sociology; Front (military); Work (physics); Media studies; Gender studies; Anthropology; Political science; Geography; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.24157522323281455,"score_gpt":0.49662823090016883,"score_spread":0.2550530076673543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551741184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019463526,0.61973095,0.003829235,0.2915817,0.009836277,0.00012681862,0.00058333925,0.00020757937,0.054640513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.131735,0.7798388,0.0065250117,0.02535626,0.0037041188,0.0006309098,0.0005061947,0.0002493338,0.05145443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960383,0.002514232,0.00020313868,0.00024509628,0.00065916433,0.0003400473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935074,0.008652,0.0006142206,0.0002739848,0.0004257157,0.00068325433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007794563,0.0008106009,0.00071105716,0.0036905801,0.0059632845,0.011802478,0.0022035995,0.005042667,0.008586687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008447025,0.001062733,0.00051175937,0.010368641,0.0103483945,0.012713954,0.0063850135,0.0045892433,0.0021347215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056103978,0.000096302625,0.0032831135,0.0031306003,0.00001578857,0.00062880863,0.2892959,0.00016319445,0.00060537364,0.04143792,0.41153914,0.24974771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078479225,0.000019617906,0.004906079,0.0034063559,0.00001650998,0.0003692326,0.3146844,0.000056540935,0.00026634222,0.008185994,0.6680405,0.000040581115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04093401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10398843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04093401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038439732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086920485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08139151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560223254","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679726","title":"Criteria for quality in qualitative research and use of freedom of information requests in the social sciences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Freedom of information; Qualitative property; Work (physics); Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6820203904628809,"score_gpt":0.7045284147875014,"score_spread":0.022508024324620513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560223254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0767664,0.0052068536,0.74568707,0.060358785,0.0016854468,0.058892198,0.00207299,0.0005844923,0.04874574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35358024,0.0012795987,0.49933094,0.0046651093,0.00019715825,0.13813768,0.00060344726,0.00031529018,0.0018905842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.2055748,0.66509145,0.07351067,0.010925909,0.040630985,0.00426621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.121107176,0.6761166,0.048443027,0.05706303,0.0925106,0.0047595534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6297683,0.0017259537,0.0046529914,0.01906987,0.016943656,0.0199224,0.005997401,0.0067727785,0.0045142947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76067084,0.0025864572,0.002537588,0.024134727,0.045490004,0.017191092,0.022081794,0.0069116564,0.0008785663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003443874,0.0001405252,0.009979812,0.006466847,0.00011602636,0.00045944843,0.5544859,0.0014005725,0.0011580869,0.3534369,0.00851445,0.063497074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041437364,0.0002874265,0.006795993,0.018254641,0.00015911681,0.00068436697,0.1586393,0.007637545,0.003516636,0.65606165,0.14702336,0.00052560406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011287084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01038603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3702317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023710903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049800403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45656163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562473293","doi":"10.1177/1468794116679873","title":"Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":580,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Grounded theory; Theoretical sampling; Qualitative research; Management science; Process (computing); Conceptual framework; Saturation (graph theory); Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.9120043105781258,"score_gpt":0.7689833316555257,"score_spread":0.14302097892260013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562473293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034718826,0.0030366718,0.89294475,0.034288958,0.0008539715,0.013193695,0.00021906695,0.00034168814,0.020402351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31301478,0.0018919229,0.6321754,0.008806054,0.00025524976,0.041853238,0.00015553029,0.0002845889,0.0015631738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.32376632,0.57183444,0.036115464,0.012690405,0.05134102,0.0042523136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2002407,0.70110613,0.024117807,0.029889274,0.041789822,0.002856204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.55596316,0.0019937542,0.003970159,0.011195627,0.01518243,0.015741602,0.008090496,0.009369047,0.003975779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6657316,0.0026534193,0.0018983533,0.012612086,0.042358022,0.024666399,0.03415701,0.010122969,0.0006841179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020979407,0.000099041405,0.0028308053,0.007987452,0.00017788833,0.0006414135,0.41424644,0.0016364049,0.0027183322,0.46975833,0.0048906,0.09480338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026780457,0.00036781962,0.0020242028,0.00912297,0.00015796525,0.00087100815,0.11018296,0.010412809,0.0043743006,0.7858469,0.076095186,0.0002761028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005648788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00616872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44403684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022260962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045477666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54757655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576190658","doi":"10.1177/1468794116682823","title":"A sociogram is worth a thousand words: proposing a method for the visual analysis of narrative data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Narrative; Computer science; Visualization; Data science; Narrative network; Data visualization; Qualitative property; Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Social network analysis; Graph; Narrative structure; Narrative criticism; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Social media; Theoretical computer science; Machine learning; Linguistics","score_opus":0.9278203283948669,"score_gpt":0.8422690525012019,"score_spread":0.08555127589366507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576190658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007837971,0.00037764048,0.9711278,0.0038978106,0.00038006576,0.0005173717,0.0005664324,0.00090441434,0.014390471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07194647,0.0004204424,0.91961646,0.00048142695,0.00016193437,0.0013782996,0.00038879577,0.00054779026,0.005058346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923793,0.0055015106,0.00033909906,0.00081056857,0.00080060505,0.00016897157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802775,0.013899809,0.0010961349,0.002281749,0.0018016979,0.00064308173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010590751,0.0011347871,0.0006886439,0.007551782,0.0032072163,0.012016829,0.0019440285,0.001680616,0.010746765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031476818,0.0008056305,0.0014273002,0.0041880924,0.008265576,0.013114808,0.005998933,0.0026563962,0.0023540133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017117427,0.00006310159,0.0018083444,0.00091572455,0.000075536685,0.0005027547,0.10406742,0.0021232732,0.0050905594,0.69117945,0.016845841,0.17715678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064736414,0.00007688093,0.0011291188,0.0010815641,0.00005371978,0.00067657355,0.040096764,0.01991643,0.0032862131,0.65620434,0.2772721,0.00014157731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024604145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034991063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012016829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019219622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032614993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05600989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739530871","doi":"10.1177/1468794117722193","title":"The iSquare protocol: combining research, art, and pedagogy through the draw-and-write technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5274670924540499,"score_gpt":0.6141890882393464,"score_spread":0.08672199578529649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739530871","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015948465,0.00051122793,0.7119334,0.010942696,0.004617661,0.12663049,0.0057369014,0.0042957864,0.1193834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03952451,0.00067219906,0.50382644,0.0031075622,0.0005043982,0.39693382,0.0016902098,0.002013585,0.051727336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90124303,0.07858245,0.005920224,0.0034520293,0.009280671,0.0015215684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7384117,0.15978919,0.00617759,0.049736664,0.040527426,0.0053573623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12055201,0.0013102563,0.00109274,0.00415417,0.007675326,0.0070370897,0.0027034213,0.002687933,0.07463388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21986048,0.0016330851,0.0008178806,0.0051653855,0.007086313,0.006276448,0.009518969,0.006880473,0.024964778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011388506,0.0006036743,0.0012608054,0.004422149,0.000055729914,0.00074635376,0.09104321,0.0011948934,0.005951271,0.19748275,0.29561123,0.40048912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040113862,0.00034153325,0.0010328029,0.0020786708,0.000032655895,0.00015970838,0.023909658,0.0014925749,0.004663523,0.06947474,0.896259,0.00015392202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014967283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030927411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12055201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037964748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021541595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6375476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751044040","doi":"10.1177/1468794117728410","title":"What role does the ‘parent-effect’ play in child centered research? The case of photo-interviews of children’s home reading practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Literacy; Narrative; Data collection; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.3867861900969759,"score_gpt":0.6157872331062011,"score_spread":0.2290010430092252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751044040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68956643,0.008389689,0.09524609,0.060638797,0.00060149457,0.000838425,0.00021539384,0.00023747681,0.14426625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814195,0.00086415856,0.007044409,0.0013584113,0.00007894511,0.0003401582,0.000015741616,0.00007005384,0.0020861574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.78685814,0.1954955,0.0024028935,0.005651307,0.005524961,0.004067135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56259024,0.40254667,0.0117114615,0.016098158,0.0045006783,0.0025527265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1599459,0.0006939258,0.0012721308,0.002561329,0.012584983,0.011706821,0.0032950712,0.0048224274,0.005704057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13895734,0.002069877,0.001154407,0.0025700233,0.062120594,0.01870603,0.011228794,0.004210143,0.00040806917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111052475,0.000060849125,0.0187315,0.0003676203,0.000062638406,0.002087919,0.88636184,0.00012777504,0.00065837876,0.07971296,0.0006388587,0.011078591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017660523,0.00035059795,0.0374797,0.0015844302,0.0001830705,0.0047393963,0.82818073,0.00069192424,0.0030163426,0.04913039,0.074332505,0.00013426004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010770652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017820366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009758933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008232301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8458849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751556990","doi":"10.1177/1468794117728411","title":"Advancing rigour in solicited diary research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Qualitative research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Research design; Psychology; Management science; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.7994687555827503,"score_gpt":0.7960433844838966,"score_spread":0.003425371098853769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751556990","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106036685,0.004862988,0.7983302,0.018733101,0.0014218254,0.03803467,0.0010220334,0.00049762713,0.031060906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47059235,0.0017778464,0.45811105,0.003720505,0.00061540294,0.062268242,0.000504667,0.00035230862,0.0020575845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.16262615,0.73520416,0.043208074,0.014120233,0.04195888,0.0028826224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.074702464,0.6459049,0.046105437,0.14684871,0.083525635,0.0029128124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.71532285,0.0027004404,0.0034697608,0.01950306,0.010938406,0.020981664,0.0077073365,0.0059785927,0.005025516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8129884,0.0023820014,0.0026762888,0.014294761,0.02792115,0.023526333,0.026637841,0.0064493674,0.0017759054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010533439,0.0008048534,0.030048933,0.012078245,0.0005367163,0.0006724885,0.4784399,0.002568033,0.00781261,0.118231274,0.005442393,0.34231123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570038,0.0032997532,0.027714452,0.03440348,0.0005946881,0.0015100607,0.18720448,0.0194858,0.025047796,0.4650701,0.23305508,0.0010442751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031505015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004448559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28467715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01625268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03043371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35105765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757742546","doi":"10.1177/1468794117731510","title":"Using internet data sources to achieve qualitative interviewing purposes: a research note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"School for Public Health Research","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; The Internet; Social media; Qualitative property; Face (sociological concept); Internet research; Psychology; Medical education; Semi-structured interview; Applied psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.948765234674034,"score_gpt":0.8017038590496283,"score_spread":0.1470613756244057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757742546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06766891,0.00443057,0.83362323,0.04147008,0.00147474,0.026429694,0.0006003843,0.00042966826,0.023872664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15663649,0.004065426,0.803063,0.0046782484,0.00030272725,0.02862271,0.00026830635,0.00036337093,0.0019997726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6216946,0.33079123,0.018173099,0.006580313,0.020428473,0.0023322129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3992311,0.49093187,0.011325456,0.045059778,0.050086327,0.0033654734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33216938,0.0013451383,0.0009870566,0.005691339,0.011701731,0.012770046,0.0036153588,0.0037954615,0.0030260852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29903328,0.0019477024,0.0010953404,0.00886669,0.016421005,0.022732506,0.013349928,0.005607042,0.0017159415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035961336,0.0009823798,0.01234713,0.007933802,0.000081261416,0.0026242605,0.54228306,0.00100095,0.018799728,0.10266168,0.009215427,0.30171075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016989082,0.0010561651,0.0054882867,0.016997404,0.00010547382,0.0038745576,0.5733409,0.0066512916,0.022161126,0.05571163,0.3141086,0.00033462787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003821596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006342124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6678306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006709349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016596057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82355404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781528524","doi":"10.1177/1468794117743463","title":"Play-making with migrant farm workers in Ontario, Canada: a kinesthetic and embodied approach to qualitative research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Qualitative research; Habitus; Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Embodied cognition; Action research; Public relations; Action (physics); Citizenship; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Cultural capital; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8220467114492359,"score_gpt":0.7273129418213309,"score_spread":0.09473376962790503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781528524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9257167,0.0034371112,0.011616952,0.01459736,0.00020523644,0.0017229907,0.00088853826,0.000059104255,0.041755825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751095,0.0018924605,0.004852102,0.0013838653,0.000018383931,0.0008776612,0.0001470826,0.00004740453,0.015671553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433607,0.0029016882,0.00013288438,0.0004894913,0.00076443865,0.0013754255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906565,0.0054916795,0.00052221253,0.00032446548,0.0016743526,0.0013307829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112930825,0.0004948978,0.0006743364,0.001963794,0.032786936,0.0063582426,0.0023255055,0.0012485939,0.0041266168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078092725,0.0005496489,0.00044873607,0.003451583,0.021463534,0.0020588946,0.005333584,0.0024981948,0.00020634534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029885476,0.000021629186,0.0032153395,0.00016511751,0.00000375079,0.00045439744,0.98486614,0.0001237605,0.00055996835,0.0034114618,0.0011999913,0.0059485747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007248982,0.000019451636,0.0045591276,0.00028109486,0.000006182109,0.00006312634,0.97102314,0.00011860121,0.00022590614,0.00073746446,0.022939852,0.000018672696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97260034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10172261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10172261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15427712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73805267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784091840","doi":"10.1177/1468794117753353","title":"Research in carceral contexts: confronting access barriers and engaging former prisoners","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario HIV Treatment Network","keywords":"Prison; Qualitative research; Public relations; Function (biology); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Criminology; Plan (archaeology); Psychology; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3735031249630323,"score_gpt":0.6427627717095051,"score_spread":0.26925964674647285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784091840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94691133,0.0012511625,0.007863173,0.020723756,0.00019753192,0.00037599038,0.000042109026,0.00004235636,0.022592656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590355,0.0003173573,0.0016397153,0.0008626403,0.000020358815,0.00020939861,0.0000064351975,0.000011639121,0.0010289103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92492324,0.06678182,0.0010409027,0.0016353163,0.0017106207,0.003908058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94668233,0.035066728,0.005228509,0.004111088,0.0034346448,0.005476693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04305548,0.0004411091,0.0007604792,0.002283996,0.027784988,0.01230169,0.0025367541,0.0030224104,0.004438942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058245853,0.0007682827,0.0003931563,0.001508682,0.0309253,0.009245784,0.014812277,0.0036581187,0.00036675436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034108274,0.000040697865,0.0037067425,0.00014976515,0.000006400277,0.0007239466,0.9795237,0.000032913755,0.00033237864,0.008493687,0.0007056034,0.0062501407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041436424,0.000034639022,0.0013505201,0.00033328848,0.0000063646808,0.0002657519,0.98684746,0.00006539117,0.00019265174,0.0018498164,0.009037895,0.000012047613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014373762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031883508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072755306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011689522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22770184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799620040","doi":"10.1177/1468794118769785","title":"Co-constructing the field for a critical ethnography of immigrants’ experiences in a Canadian Francophone minority community","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Participant observation; Sociology; Immigration; French; Field (mathematics); Critical ethnography; Gender studies; Construct (python library); Field research; Qualitative research; Anthropology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5221177161698419,"score_gpt":0.6890439702973913,"score_spread":0.16692625412754936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799620040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88994056,0.0018953563,0.035736363,0.015491651,0.0005627145,0.004687242,0.00039877265,0.00011430919,0.051173065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95911396,0.00071848725,0.025581967,0.0013594968,0.00006197987,0.0015016461,0.000111129455,0.00004639882,0.011505025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98943806,0.0071727983,0.00020661479,0.00060562143,0.0010462758,0.0015307412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889436,0.0053483984,0.00047210048,0.00059950625,0.002984783,0.001651622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025115788,0.0007529997,0.00044025382,0.00419078,0.03563518,0.007935047,0.0016221622,0.0015776263,0.0029341455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011817846,0.0004600179,0.0005202187,0.0020370095,0.020170664,0.0025525084,0.006088261,0.00221686,0.0003265441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006112723,0.000057473255,0.0032538173,0.00011413299,0.000005336132,0.00090870186,0.9581897,0.00018876033,0.0023886028,0.013325588,0.003207044,0.01829965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013376821,0.000037626254,0.00317713,0.00034028088,0.000011978881,0.00016941549,0.95020896,0.00025970142,0.0007437261,0.0018251213,0.043175526,0.00003717279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7344324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86875105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2655676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04753255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08209834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53426313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809432046","doi":"10.1177/1468794118781380","title":"Moving between theory and practice within an Indigenous research paradigm","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Paradigm shift; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Reciprocal; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.3238106970331905,"score_gpt":0.6304965313042169,"score_spread":0.3066858342710264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809432046","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059136022,0.03348592,0.3296014,0.32601714,0.004070175,0.0017106343,0.000108025335,0.00020448059,0.24566612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8081061,0.013791431,0.14602387,0.018889133,0.0014672972,0.002805085,0.000056257522,0.00011777523,0.008743061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8055606,0.16503274,0.004085632,0.008266437,0.013358942,0.0036956486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86048317,0.114429764,0.0039314115,0.007632281,0.009723973,0.0037994017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16988263,0.00094441976,0.0024484396,0.0075683002,0.015281012,0.022737807,0.0053677876,0.008004141,0.0024598658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06043939,0.0008027917,0.0011405,0.0056281937,0.17103352,0.025057511,0.017836247,0.014011615,0.00056093984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013597566,0.00005603898,0.00040898338,0.0006165076,0.000024013367,0.0001784933,0.16878879,0.00032176968,0.00019857637,0.817864,0.0013008966,0.010228214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032701068,0.000082611856,0.0005099414,0.0022745945,0.000018242208,0.0001637722,0.103774585,0.00095246616,0.0002792978,0.81750625,0.074356124,0.000049387218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01965446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016565897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026226955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04932092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89843595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883435672","doi":"10.1177/1468794118788004","title":"Witchcraft and supernatural harm: navigating spiritual ethics in political science research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Harm; Politics; Research ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Work (physics); Spiritual care; Field (mathematics); Bioethics; Epistemology; Political science; Spirituality; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4791582883124163,"score_gpt":0.672744616814401,"score_spread":0.1935863285019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883435672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5189832,0.019536115,0.13408928,0.24204843,0.0016474942,0.0009495736,0.00005720706,0.00006399565,0.082624614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97577626,0.003456943,0.013630404,0.005203543,0.00015082619,0.00041102004,0.000010206613,0.000029337729,0.001331413],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.86449987,0.12860027,0.0012765656,0.0016067184,0.0023043929,0.0017122703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8303366,0.15130763,0.0077875042,0.0044901134,0.003198312,0.002879822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11527936,0.00051235507,0.0008462081,0.0028633266,0.022549765,0.018022612,0.002169327,0.0052409093,0.003113306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0889832,0.0010220517,0.000392064,0.002339026,0.13054721,0.019754073,0.01965731,0.009931419,0.00026664944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017163977,0.000030736934,0.0020485525,0.00030220303,0.000009648368,0.00047467052,0.7816265,0.0001356771,0.00023250109,0.20201609,0.0008280683,0.012278165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001816408,0.000047652095,0.001085372,0.001797639,0.000013752874,0.0005218599,0.76497877,0.00040567017,0.00047499532,0.19796127,0.03266522,0.000029607361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008622662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11527936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01000592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019707913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60966283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897285595","doi":"10.1177/1468794118803022","title":"Negotiating with gatekeepers to get interviews with politicians: qualitative research recruitment in a digital media environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Negotiation; Reputation; Politics; Qualitative research; Social media; Sociology; Reputation management; Digital media; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7666971906980924,"score_gpt":0.7040218733260135,"score_spread":0.06267531737207888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897285595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213126,0.0018396999,0.11776362,0.01921756,0.0006746773,0.015254659,0.0004377295,0.00024065425,0.023258727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90282017,0.0017717318,0.063777566,0.0044387723,0.0002030582,0.01924014,0.00016696996,0.00019415606,0.0073873927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8755358,0.11186049,0.0027335112,0.0026867688,0.00308492,0.004098574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.846556,0.12887986,0.005799906,0.0040450757,0.006768021,0.007951129],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11866002,0.0007964112,0.0011472394,0.0036264616,0.01702166,0.008830482,0.00283229,0.0030542489,0.0049653347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12708075,0.001615592,0.0006490997,0.0035282415,0.017978353,0.009192956,0.009290299,0.0045732735,0.0019223941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092295166,0.00013334253,0.0014226201,0.00034230782,0.000005632555,0.0006044299,0.9762456,0.00017160442,0.0014708758,0.0064363633,0.0012783986,0.011796545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049995957,0.00014137241,0.0005398438,0.0006445813,0.00000643747,0.00022126231,0.9670966,0.00041822257,0.0010625467,0.004701974,0.025085883,0.000031195024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023263928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00428901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88133997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074254656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013157683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62754166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915215940","doi":"10.1177/1468794119830076","title":"Participatory training in disability and migration: mobilizing community capacities for advocacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Participatory action research; Transformative learning; Sociology; Oppression; General partnership; Citizen journalism; Training (meteorology); Public relations; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.6324257609704906,"score_gpt":0.6246997909268173,"score_spread":0.007725970043673369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915215940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44074258,0.0051717684,0.08720231,0.15963498,0.0013975252,0.0019736656,0.00006695354,0.00015810848,0.3036521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98085713,0.0008095509,0.008992322,0.0015797729,0.000072007955,0.00054148363,0.000011627492,0.000022341941,0.007113776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96515447,0.030366253,0.0002848357,0.00091804797,0.0010994362,0.0021768794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671628,0.024639407,0.0016711605,0.0019046769,0.0013537809,0.0032681657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042192683,0.0005821796,0.0004689669,0.0019822896,0.02711989,0.009774779,0.0032644828,0.0034846046,0.0057424633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028587088,0.00035094793,0.0003893265,0.001392699,0.056089565,0.0068340325,0.02589163,0.0043095164,0.0003525927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027531176,0.00014783595,0.0014763498,0.00024560367,0.000008051621,0.0004271505,0.80682766,0.000273405,0.00039740754,0.14610924,0.0028391718,0.04122053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031840722,0.00008582268,0.0012999617,0.0006176175,0.000007153393,0.00028830473,0.8302853,0.00026661617,0.00037116805,0.07988371,0.0868382,0.000024353718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020629913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042293936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042192683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011052843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042103708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22313893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947458104","doi":"10.1177/1468794119851336","title":"The necessity of a relational ethics alongside Noddings’ ethics of care in narrative inquiry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Ethics of care; Indigenous; Narrative; Sociology; Club; Identity (music); Narrative inquiry; Environmental ethics; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.6814733013135371,"score_gpt":0.6720827856224815,"score_spread":0.009390515691055645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947458104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55606204,0.006979463,0.122714154,0.10640574,0.00087191636,0.0008341971,0.00009060013,0.00013030626,0.20591156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728555,0.00056171726,0.008502827,0.0011092739,0.00006088536,0.0003084274,0.000007256686,0.000029496336,0.002134567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.905547,0.08727844,0.001216587,0.0018473939,0.0025268346,0.0015836499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9335567,0.055266973,0.0030983163,0.0031583451,0.00242422,0.0024954898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060253665,0.000530743,0.00083257473,0.0020616043,0.015975935,0.018368622,0.0019733347,0.0040590963,0.0024284858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047628712,0.000871756,0.0004767599,0.0016861182,0.10453877,0.022444494,0.013865767,0.0054765213,0.00031790923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010696478,0.000009613413,0.00050351303,0.00008150037,0.0000037875411,0.00023856875,0.84374666,0.000060096154,0.00015145274,0.15257193,0.00033261743,0.0022895057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018539191,0.00003606506,0.00066447986,0.00060873525,0.000012818499,0.0009148588,0.8095379,0.00040902963,0.00039089477,0.13585827,0.051512603,0.000035905516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068719382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008282887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060253665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009606503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31865567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947676566","doi":"10.1177/1468794119851330","title":"Discovering dimensions of research ethics in doing oral history: going public in the case of the Ghent orphanages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Oral history; Situational ethics; Interpretation (philosophy); Public history; Sociology; Politics; Research ethics; Comparative historical research; Social science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Political science; Media studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5247920455599239,"score_gpt":0.6137663961846743,"score_spread":0.08897435062475045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947676566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8861104,0.004375315,0.011239225,0.039274193,0.00028466072,0.00024776324,0.00008748418,0.00004641493,0.058334526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536526,0.00056251884,0.001454735,0.00073796377,0.000034752207,0.000087766886,0.0000127315625,0.000021170768,0.0017231136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568395,0.035861265,0.0008507128,0.0016655545,0.0020682958,0.0027146977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572594,0.03164633,0.004650738,0.0030592782,0.0015631152,0.0018210973],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038855616,0.00046026005,0.0008142495,0.0035554287,0.02985074,0.015007767,0.0025871142,0.0047810543,0.004021489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04171761,0.00081910973,0.00040933272,0.004331255,0.09444409,0.014617957,0.013646749,0.0065358337,0.00024061375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009894292,0.0000048564657,0.0009883216,0.00005194567,0.0000031167638,0.0006938415,0.9654319,0.000031019714,0.000098386394,0.029949255,0.00036087076,0.0023766146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020538218,0.000008548765,0.00095939246,0.00021277188,0.0000053641384,0.0004625396,0.9708373,0.0000485875,0.00013903576,0.008755355,0.018555209,0.000013907467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035789926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046458263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99521893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015046827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010974064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20549059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951865297","doi":"10.1177/1468794119847578","title":"Toward a transnational feminist methodology of encounter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situated; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Gender studies; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8185853627063606,"score_gpt":0.7295018813106071,"score_spread":0.0890834813957535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951865297","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050976995,0.010026384,0.47074944,0.054504957,0.0015706385,0.001438945,0.00035430124,0.00029796996,0.41008034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72968847,0.0061389664,0.21708824,0.0059768683,0.00036056782,0.0058351355,0.0003096525,0.00046605218,0.034136046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9428913,0.05172563,0.0007008245,0.0021158191,0.00164038,0.00092603895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783142,0.014405941,0.0012357092,0.0028189823,0.0024147565,0.00081038824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04353511,0.0013217006,0.0011091289,0.006224816,0.01426437,0.016866937,0.004167748,0.0032262818,0.0075446875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018664323,0.00082826184,0.00072354206,0.0062516103,0.050967544,0.017718738,0.01698273,0.006776847,0.0011338919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133650765,0.000017544704,0.0006563268,0.00025930692,0.000010395696,0.0001610293,0.3068327,0.0001735176,0.00021476767,0.6775551,0.0013433212,0.012762731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011798208,0.000041272895,0.0010133624,0.0013347764,0.000016869559,0.00048842205,0.45452875,0.0007631799,0.00051645096,0.25961113,0.28164396,0.000029970113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011328901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015419237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98573565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013977007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011070881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23023844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980954613","doi":"10.1177/1468794119880746","title":"Situating the life story narratives of aging immigrants within a structural context: the intersectional life course perspective as research praxis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life course approach; Photovoice; Operationalization; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Everyday life; Immigration; Praxis; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7032767612204109,"score_gpt":0.7400981043034065,"score_spread":0.03682134308299556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980954613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943729,0.0018875259,0.011791105,0.0062819147,0.00014192227,0.00047943505,0.0002983027,0.000034159744,0.03535659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897646,0.0010251347,0.0055824285,0.00043305612,0.000022028215,0.0002883513,0.00006676012,0.000022890476,0.002794725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955101,0.0033562065,0.00010336137,0.00026191148,0.0002943206,0.00047412998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258715,0.0050224587,0.00053890335,0.0005072983,0.00073660974,0.00060772366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011445456,0.0006800357,0.0004764191,0.002594357,0.014445585,0.009830938,0.0020686896,0.0016633826,0.0035289691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010614266,0.00043589348,0.00042051912,0.0021635538,0.019135417,0.005923719,0.0077250116,0.00207671,0.00023196382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016563545,0.00001692006,0.0019846233,0.00008381682,0.0000036289914,0.00026877996,0.98654747,0.000037329337,0.0004643636,0.005984345,0.00023816968,0.0043540383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027479248,0.000013439304,0.0017286937,0.00014718025,0.0000068881845,0.00009385829,0.98585516,0.00006422561,0.00028617505,0.0015464134,0.010247145,0.000008041093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10472668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23490033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10472668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010685579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01320079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20823419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988730351","doi":"10.1177/1468794119885040","title":"Where’s the database in digital ethnography? Exploring database ethnography for open data research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Sociology; Ethnography; Data science; Key (lock); Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.7969043138591074,"score_gpt":0.6418251739474456,"score_spread":0.15507913991166178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988730351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24364349,0.032365087,0.42821872,0.17698282,0.002659532,0.0026403773,0.0013205702,0.0003222341,0.11184711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.823682,0.013564278,0.14300095,0.009539349,0.00064014783,0.0042257174,0.00046831224,0.00032213776,0.0045572617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8971182,0.094167225,0.0019914864,0.0026711025,0.0022390296,0.001812894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.833481,0.1479328,0.0032048395,0.009176189,0.0036010286,0.0026040913],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08449851,0.0009844083,0.0013214515,0.0072367843,0.013083069,0.024996774,0.003926235,0.0044489983,0.0060701035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08824269,0.0012340259,0.0009147248,0.009222454,0.04683728,0.045939535,0.01754493,0.0059220796,0.0007855461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040761937,0.000067537694,0.003352164,0.00049750257,0.000022052753,0.0005773107,0.7742314,0.00031506707,0.00043460866,0.1874656,0.0033814146,0.029614635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036268728,0.00003863733,0.0013329033,0.0021899948,0.000021994802,0.000402753,0.74929076,0.0010649501,0.00037977507,0.12576394,0.119411595,0.00006640494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010250527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015343029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009622522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076213586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44687617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006688485","doi":"10.1177/1468794120906012","title":"Working the aporia: ethnography, embodiment and the ethnographic self","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Scholarship; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6843093927139514,"score_gpt":0.6624807157343372,"score_spread":0.021828676979614214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006688485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77125823,0.02003546,0.07927387,0.037395176,0.0008265397,0.0012263287,0.0002504829,0.00018929255,0.08954448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733675,0.0044307136,0.015591687,0.0015691767,0.0001430681,0.0008868135,0.000050406117,0.00006075501,0.0038998185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93366486,0.062266454,0.0007230875,0.0010440018,0.0013824796,0.0009191313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96172315,0.032645326,0.0014402702,0.0024719,0.00082077744,0.000898607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03382131,0.0006576399,0.0006551326,0.004081647,0.009233929,0.012075233,0.0019011471,0.0022665628,0.002304976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028814955,0.00058890425,0.00040348733,0.003761974,0.048414163,0.01656839,0.011446196,0.003160931,0.00032591895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015615307,0.000031367694,0.0012563285,0.0001564865,0.0000064736273,0.0003368456,0.9398253,0.000077705205,0.00025265457,0.049396537,0.00092453026,0.0077202036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020059317,0.000050004997,0.0010526902,0.000781406,0.000008324316,0.0005063371,0.9096091,0.0002982288,0.0004142764,0.046251424,0.040979486,0.000028659615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048340987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00712665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004312376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038651677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17886633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017333755","doi":"10.1177/1468794120909038","title":"Key considerations when interviewing individuals with expressive language difficulties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interview; Qualitative research; Psychology; Key (lock); Intellectual disability; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.3862540945960357,"score_gpt":0.56094389991188,"score_spread":0.17468980531584427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017333755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08644688,0.029290114,0.34856048,0.3963289,0.020605948,0.0496764,0.0013681053,0.0008946552,0.06682857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27026555,0.013451641,0.51825404,0.059018668,0.003511849,0.12272779,0.00037302508,0.0006796988,0.011717757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.27076945,0.6601118,0.033766884,0.010125627,0.01989018,0.005336184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27775207,0.6415875,0.016548637,0.015902646,0.038960095,0.009249093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5099655,0.0022006952,0.004450021,0.0074614375,0.03190002,0.028940748,0.011352891,0.014208822,0.009614758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49137992,0.0046195225,0.0023163743,0.008033864,0.050362043,0.02068403,0.016157556,0.014683635,0.0042149937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016988424,0.00004687302,0.001663991,0.00562754,0.000072060946,0.0023839287,0.92453486,0.0001666408,0.0022563655,0.025685249,0.010481353,0.026911179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081011334,0.00011322202,0.0008678869,0.008483975,0.000075166565,0.0020866762,0.8468746,0.00031548945,0.0010540212,0.041100852,0.098831005,0.00011612319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009898325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03136525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49003452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015258455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03681509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60429984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037148320","doi":"10.1177/1468794120934398","title":"Photovoice, emergency management and climate change: a comparative case-study approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Photovoice; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Focus group; Participatory action research; Sociology; Work (physics); Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Climate change; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Engineering","score_opus":0.9649627906532334,"score_gpt":0.7976799185037576,"score_spread":0.1672828721494758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037148320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252192,0.007359,0.008731761,0.005404723,0.00032961913,0.0072003687,0.00044440335,0.000023145985,0.045287654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96886617,0.005480053,0.009383176,0.0012707302,0.000086136155,0.005319596,0.0001125747,0.0000152121875,0.009466366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884212,0.009351755,0.00025874228,0.00044503258,0.0005262063,0.0009970211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059755,0.00708853,0.0006362879,0.00046297352,0.00057855994,0.0006362096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012683494,0.00064433896,0.000829509,0.003428408,0.012359105,0.0031392972,0.0028810455,0.0040291334,0.008264196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010806474,0.0005440289,0.00066781044,0.0046098586,0.0055326773,0.0036729767,0.005749442,0.002045175,0.00046546146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079430355,0.007105504,0.015251094,0.0042711343,0.00010278459,0.02325858,0.79881495,0.0010623747,0.0021640286,0.057637885,0.0066368924,0.082900405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014427099,0.001540535,0.0070633455,0.0015711448,0.00007222198,0.0038833825,0.9277097,0.0004975097,0.0008160042,0.0042278566,0.05242138,0.00005275107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020483477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063908026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020483477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009907049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006385715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071881056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094611420","doi":"10.1177/1468794120965374","title":"A critical discussion of the use of film in participatory research projects with homeless young people: an analysis based on case examples from England and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; University of Central Lancashire; Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Sociology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Publics; Participatory design; Media studies; Economic Justice; The Symbolic; Gender studies; Public relations; Politics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8844590982352759,"score_gpt":0.7048359669098964,"score_spread":0.17962313132537955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094611420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81927407,0.012094547,0.010106909,0.056107093,0.0007615632,0.0019928312,0.0004960847,0.00009262665,0.09907422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796138,0.0046333633,0.0042022667,0.00213152,0.00006673355,0.0006825875,0.000075564654,0.000109316,0.008484882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523861,0.03418072,0.0013164898,0.0017803129,0.0046632104,0.005673067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9260641,0.06038521,0.0023481853,0.0017096448,0.006637195,0.0028556336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03281069,0.0017760915,0.001758361,0.0063714,0.06768475,0.023038724,0.005466324,0.0074155787,0.0035221279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052202024,0.00143908,0.0009038751,0.012113217,0.05093785,0.007813693,0.013944743,0.0069660544,0.00031732538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015877347,0.000005973935,0.00059122115,0.00015071093,0.0000033342326,0.0015966457,0.98743874,0.000028980046,0.00021677384,0.007602558,0.00046637355,0.0018828026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050804833,0.000010650984,0.0010043567,0.00049822964,0.000010214671,0.00046034768,0.97378653,0.00004664291,0.00024354122,0.00064736645,0.023269089,0.000017943112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77648187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84589356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08140344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052959636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59062606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113809065","doi":"10.1177/1468794120980975","title":"The Face in Visual Representations of Children","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Politics; Sociology; Visual culture; Psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Anthropology; Law; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.35701017037661714,"score_gpt":0.6298668888188117,"score_spread":0.27285671844219456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113809065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40826747,0.0075473106,0.020008935,0.026109908,0.00033542735,0.00006509285,0.00021542658,0.000089224675,0.5373612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868144,0.000996812,0.0015946125,0.0006341965,0.0000553045,0.000039302762,0.000024609562,0.000041543004,0.007932252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946483,0.003849939,0.00009518573,0.0003693119,0.0006291779,0.0004081173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686617,0.0020406323,0.00044912263,0.00028490947,0.00020153019,0.00015768266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00267118,0.00036500025,0.00023347599,0.001414063,0.004812958,0.0077067357,0.00058362493,0.001768691,0.006378014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073032966,0.00020930833,0.00026809762,0.00097196636,0.03567783,0.008044686,0.005092229,0.002288094,0.0004085495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021373758,0.00001038487,0.0015393299,0.00007650677,0.000005398065,0.00032300618,0.5775437,0.000089814304,0.0008177783,0.40747246,0.0018921201,0.010208031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016782653,0.000047601417,0.005075475,0.0004929268,0.00001906565,0.0019105186,0.57983744,0.00020082672,0.0015540696,0.11084634,0.29994544,0.000053508484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062843696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057268953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077067357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032394533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013741087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02350396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171410757","doi":"10.1177/14687941211010029","title":"Imagining research together and working across divides: Arts-informed research about young people’s (post) digital lives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participatory action research; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Visual research; The arts; Focus group; Conceptual framework; Photo elicitation; Realization (probability); Participatory design; Visual arts; Social science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8777786780609822,"score_gpt":0.786335206735945,"score_spread":0.09144347132503716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171410757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899763,0.0053054667,0.020638198,0.017103454,0.00035101938,0.0005352544,0.00009230859,0.000061378225,0.06593656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922444,0.0012656846,0.0029909979,0.00059898396,0.000039456856,0.0002037025,0.000020583899,0.000026804279,0.0026093882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672645,0.027621282,0.0007490412,0.0011866987,0.00161281,0.0015656619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543355,0.03655746,0.0027366872,0.0026953586,0.0014954378,0.0021796061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041029796,0.0006428938,0.00072893105,0.004229129,0.015594067,0.017720936,0.0017634613,0.0025513845,0.0033698378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032807425,0.00094288145,0.00065491226,0.003045516,0.04600907,0.01880272,0.017520562,0.0038850782,0.00046121128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008108638,0.000016286349,0.00096507184,0.00006866369,0.000004174806,0.00014257464,0.98459923,0.000017985752,0.00013577816,0.008379925,0.00014546131,0.00551682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049144414,0.000027819755,0.0008562488,0.00016913773,0.000006214332,0.00014986559,0.9810129,0.000026697084,0.00020567428,0.0064128665,0.011119405,0.000008267768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033985032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005774615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041029796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005636617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008967498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21698892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185729747","doi":"10.1177/14687941211034963","title":"“You have the right to love and be loved”: participatory theatre for disability justice with self-advocates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Canadian Institute for Health Information","funders":"Vancouver Foundation","keywords":"Ableism; Citizenship; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Self-advocacy; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Reproductive health; Participatory action research; Intellectual disability; Disability studies; Liminality; Human sexuality; Citizen journalism; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.2785678661328887,"score_gpt":0.5688530088332308,"score_spread":0.29028514270034206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185729747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4858807,0.0050066584,0.06629421,0.09472209,0.0028167663,0.001130843,0.00016823394,0.0003701477,0.34361038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97516,0.0007887003,0.007329238,0.0022393968,0.0000906346,0.00046075086,0.000028021088,0.000120431316,0.013782826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9308814,0.06349479,0.00046452,0.0008199465,0.001964282,0.002375125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788858,0.014221589,0.0012130294,0.001653773,0.0012751238,0.0027507525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031216817,0.0006688757,0.00052327494,0.0012479275,0.024683462,0.011170023,0.0021571193,0.0031982088,0.007271763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028370488,0.0004398226,0.00082955486,0.0009359532,0.04524616,0.010378104,0.015712667,0.0059722257,0.001155898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042188505,0.00006439252,0.00036376587,0.0001652158,0.000005602632,0.00039780687,0.92915744,0.0001201841,0.0004991493,0.054314397,0.0056239595,0.009245896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021764108,0.0000745441,0.00037950094,0.0005419742,0.0000095574,0.0005565451,0.80862254,0.0002444573,0.00067184324,0.019915903,0.16892055,0.000040777904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008654989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031216817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062435186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010516788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16509229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206381486","doi":"10.1177/14687941211049323","title":"Binary blues: Exploring beyond dichotomized gender comparisons with a theory-driven approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College of the Rockies; University of Toronto; York University; University of Victoria; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Dualism; Reflexivity; Gender schema theory; Sociology; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Photo elicitation; Epistemology; Feminist theory; Intersectionality; Binary opposition; Psychology; Social psychology; Feminism; Social science","score_opus":0.5904492538822896,"score_gpt":0.5490854375029681,"score_spread":0.041363816379321516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206381486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09845121,0.0023760926,0.7254073,0.027810132,0.0010642522,0.0014534622,0.00041659985,0.0002537153,0.14276722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768015,0.0008882868,0.21047437,0.0027404313,0.00011807013,0.0032247824,0.000210143,0.00026684895,0.0052756267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95994455,0.0348125,0.00047257278,0.0017157511,0.0022375267,0.0008170319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94324553,0.047705673,0.002122549,0.0032148857,0.00279005,0.0009212606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060743194,0.0011809911,0.0011514302,0.005512235,0.008484978,0.01278353,0.003897915,0.0022665628,0.009968001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053573377,0.00080929033,0.0009336735,0.003941307,0.04370342,0.016795062,0.0110206725,0.0061607324,0.000901491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049296672,0.00005707057,0.000919265,0.0003003305,0.000020494093,0.000110484994,0.20839281,0.00024330923,0.00042453982,0.76120925,0.0017368905,0.026536219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039820672,0.000060165672,0.0009082273,0.00082397304,0.000021828959,0.00012621055,0.14722021,0.0022085053,0.0006910668,0.8018126,0.046057194,0.000030317697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003296269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066193207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9392568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083421115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008278262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214749562","doi":"10.1177/14687941211072792","title":"Listen to her: Re-finding culturally responsive poetic inquiry as home knowing for women of African descent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","keywords":"Storytelling; Sociology; The arts; Poetry; African descent; Knowledge production; Poetics; Immigration; Aesthetics; Psychology; Narrative; Anthropology; Visual arts; Computer science; Knowledge management; History","score_opus":0.6545711309947028,"score_gpt":0.6849552118196327,"score_spread":0.030384080824929938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214749562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7721459,0.004550476,0.018272925,0.07873166,0.0013952616,0.00075428176,0.000086281405,0.00019591846,0.123867214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687881,0.001776395,0.007891062,0.0049361577,0.000092235525,0.00027315092,0.00002918813,0.00011428225,0.016099408],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810178,0.015710426,0.00017610926,0.00053151435,0.0010236604,0.0015404944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98297036,0.011302206,0.0008332075,0.0012950167,0.001376477,0.0022226782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026142552,0.0006523796,0.0007025784,0.002017938,0.02891076,0.011816305,0.0024448005,0.0033468653,0.0037647448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029723573,0.00051160157,0.00055064284,0.0013260974,0.048308022,0.008329167,0.013737365,0.006725072,0.00058621727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011045709,0.0000133396625,0.00026376077,0.000038880342,0.0000013154466,0.00025671258,0.98849005,0.00001074195,0.00027939142,0.005103867,0.00085820205,0.004672755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003883179,0.000017381191,0.0001953073,0.00014768926,0.0000033113697,0.00016954244,0.96802336,0.00003212434,0.00022845891,0.002367901,0.02880123,0.000009767712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03657306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07299784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03657306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010334325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023890788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13825667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225009018","doi":"10.1177/14687941221096604","title":"A side-by-side methodological approach: Shared experience, informality and adaptation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Qualitative research; Face (sociological concept); Adaptation (eye); Common ground; Great Rift; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.8740419199226072,"score_gpt":0.7055077223247346,"score_spread":0.16853419759787258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225009018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18167512,0.0050647054,0.66264814,0.020927856,0.0017723414,0.020316187,0.00063471345,0.00022779233,0.10673317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73158514,0.0021130147,0.22397108,0.0038257064,0.0002539281,0.03087496,0.00026501017,0.00020988534,0.006901261],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.83754224,0.1422109,0.005313721,0.0067420388,0.0063304254,0.0018606341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8989966,0.067762844,0.0052333483,0.016317286,0.010047391,0.0016425332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10313059,0.0011267709,0.0014248093,0.0061502135,0.010658875,0.012288088,0.0039710454,0.0030068236,0.0061123525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098836385,0.0010555118,0.00128259,0.005172234,0.036605015,0.015379559,0.017689008,0.0047391886,0.0010511911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000140805,0.00023360753,0.0049988185,0.002559112,0.00014476458,0.0006455594,0.7151811,0.0003549258,0.0023237457,0.22010179,0.0021898358,0.05112588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012402644,0.00047775317,0.0035615733,0.004483186,0.00017437286,0.00094875024,0.7056208,0.0015420677,0.0030200214,0.20595282,0.07398844,0.000106266576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021882714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8968694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006131495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015721474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5454132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229441438","doi":"10.1177/14687941221096592","title":"“He/his/she/her/father/mother/son/daughter”: A critical reflection of reproductions of cis-normativity and cis-dominance in preparing qualitative data for analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Daughter; Heteronormativity; Dominance (genetics); Sociology; Qualitative research; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social justice; Gender studies; Social psychology; Human sexuality; Social science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7397011393593811,"score_gpt":0.7417182434142487,"score_spread":0.0020171040548676578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229441438","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3453627,0.0068946388,0.19195366,0.391984,0.0067166155,0.0027986416,0.00030844656,0.00036942615,0.053611845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93610466,0.002713569,0.035010725,0.016362427,0.0006363155,0.0019582848,0.00006559801,0.00047642444,0.0066720536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.67841136,0.29893064,0.0039794017,0.0053921873,0.008846312,0.0044401377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71222746,0.24776812,0.008410902,0.008099252,0.017758299,0.0057359478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2016046,0.0020771716,0.0018231182,0.0033918007,0.034266915,0.0215357,0.0046412377,0.0078452295,0.002359564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20190656,0.0021305822,0.0015482281,0.0026226155,0.10706674,0.02553669,0.01796763,0.025725652,0.0007549346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015093668,0.0000077489685,0.00012851942,0.00007903442,0.000003362987,0.00042478464,0.9785406,0.000049174032,0.00036345955,0.017961023,0.001104467,0.0013226754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010508093,0.00002370272,0.00009941706,0.00059508043,0.000007529933,0.00048859994,0.9414622,0.0002330154,0.00084725,0.016283419,0.039909706,0.000039569633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008382554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00901592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7983954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019357877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019453414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98456365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280498888","doi":"10.1177/14687941221098927","title":"Hierarchy and inequality in research: Navigating the challenges of research in Ghana","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inequality; Stigma (botany); Mental health; Data collection; Hierarchy; Psychology; Focus group; Sociology; Public relations; Applied psychology; Political science; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8968303792439632,"score_gpt":0.7578192566602281,"score_spread":0.13901112258373516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280498888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197347,0.011602147,0.014298286,0.11612153,0.0004257722,0.0004273663,0.000052559153,0.000049202954,0.037288513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916722,0.0017952323,0.0029689113,0.001966898,0.00007456947,0.00016901952,0.0000125379465,0.000029385172,0.0013113056],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9111711,0.07689793,0.001988489,0.0016400217,0.003918935,0.004383586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92337126,0.059618175,0.007264536,0.0025452056,0.0020177648,0.005183062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04938936,0.000496504,0.0010764371,0.0027173907,0.027375514,0.013766189,0.0018610744,0.0032605368,0.0038907235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0518581,0.0009470544,0.00036659674,0.0037493745,0.05212952,0.014451235,0.024819078,0.0058923895,0.0003762426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026531017,0.00002189898,0.002886459,0.00020098538,0.0000052195314,0.0012925478,0.9701009,0.000053490476,0.00042307004,0.015434014,0.0007154459,0.008839431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019876132,0.00004807348,0.002136698,0.0006602494,0.000006446186,0.0007115212,0.9527152,0.00012036143,0.00014213008,0.016754877,0.026664132,0.000020362115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01570943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024443138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011799151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015843421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26119906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283590961","doi":"10.1177/14687941221110179","title":"Ethically important moments: Researching the intimate lives of adults labeled/with intellectual disabilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Embodied cognition; Intellectual disability; Romance; Psychology; Sociology; Disability studies; Human sexuality; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21977121593601365,"score_gpt":0.5549950202975042,"score_spread":0.3352238043614906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283590961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89861953,0.0045878827,0.00900086,0.036973238,0.00080396346,0.00044220246,0.00009968366,0.00005023751,0.049422313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854146,0.002945628,0.0027368981,0.0039822846,0.00012164844,0.0003449376,0.000030571053,0.00003783874,0.0043854816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592395,0.035683107,0.00071708614,0.00083335704,0.0016235802,0.0019033911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590616,0.03189705,0.0028895817,0.0014298023,0.0018319096,0.0028901182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024675854,0.0006068263,0.0007902944,0.0017828455,0.022157557,0.0136197535,0.0020641878,0.0040707737,0.0032933487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03871892,0.00082393276,0.00066213333,0.0013854799,0.04001315,0.012133868,0.015610999,0.008976465,0.0005737705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007603822,0.000012316118,0.00034079817,0.00004720652,0.000001558275,0.00026695288,0.99368954,0.000007157695,0.00020308606,0.003532715,0.0002527189,0.0016383707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013595244,0.000008369739,0.00014001838,0.00010938524,0.0000015404842,0.00013249229,0.9946524,0.00000751354,0.0001085545,0.000654698,0.0041798498,0.000003800443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048337365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010027762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024675854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006039113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008526902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13049996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297995984","doi":"10.1177/14687941221129804","title":"Future memory work: unsettling temporal Othering through speculative research practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions","keywords":"Construct (python library); Memory work; Indigenous; Dimension (graph theory); Work (physics); Narrative; Sociology; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5443132042881852,"score_gpt":0.6174875122738533,"score_spread":0.07317430798566815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297995984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32515392,0.016566467,0.1718783,0.15385093,0.0023138379,0.0004714061,0.00013397285,0.00026533316,0.32936585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981277,0.0015150867,0.009782976,0.0018761291,0.00015509887,0.00019638556,0.000024180074,0.00008480103,0.0050884094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604199,0.033380855,0.0007018809,0.0022574367,0.0017941137,0.0014458722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949617,0.035719026,0.0031812657,0.006876906,0.002479741,0.0021261016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06367214,0.00081353285,0.000711473,0.0038352988,0.022165835,0.017764324,0.0040117656,0.0035203225,0.0055680736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04559466,0.0007739814,0.0006885592,0.0023169662,0.15439323,0.03026779,0.017683981,0.006448017,0.0004435348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016610247,0.000012493718,0.00040673596,0.000101787366,0.0000058444625,0.00012095852,0.5859345,0.000056934525,0.00015227041,0.40776578,0.0005631134,0.004862992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021050291,0.000040990253,0.0004529264,0.00079844886,0.000016362681,0.00028950738,0.6214868,0.00035163408,0.00039046947,0.2741154,0.102006294,0.000030150246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077773486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013751088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97783417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011583378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011208414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33673447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378652588","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176931","title":"Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Focus group; Great Rift; Focus (optics); Psychology; Dynamics (music); Social psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5136757521572586,"score_gpt":0.6439928010743068,"score_spread":0.1303170489170482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378652588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446274,0.0012174202,0.09376987,0.015231213,0.0020120065,0.0033520781,0.0005961819,0.0006082389,0.03858557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94170886,0.000763644,0.033849437,0.005375495,0.0004858268,0.006179603,0.0002544782,0.00039788548,0.010984713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.86619526,0.11692979,0.0042846655,0.0040745726,0.0059661055,0.0025496562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.710067,0.24248901,0.0174493,0.008953994,0.017627487,0.0034132116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081166066,0.0014235685,0.0010559774,0.0020156442,0.0067601427,0.0035348749,0.002043428,0.0034395077,0.0073724184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19978185,0.001037686,0.0007479196,0.0012355838,0.007426281,0.007231692,0.008096889,0.003019172,0.0021283356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051092956,0.000079425474,0.0067152483,0.0007752701,0.00003340984,0.0011669658,0.93854237,0.000117768745,0.008777106,0.00391513,0.0037241597,0.03564227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014784743,0.0009258116,0.008069255,0.002301368,0.00008654365,0.0015862056,0.84159845,0.0011463307,0.014119198,0.014362393,0.115467854,0.00018878478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008914324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016854866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018249082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002358277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42925233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378831244","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176947","title":"Charlas y Comidas: Humanising focus groups and interviews","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Ethnography; Focus group; Feeling; Sociology; Qualitative research; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.7236316614784513,"score_gpt":0.7390011184585082,"score_spread":0.015369456980056984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378831244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383303,0.003856861,0.12043692,0.011827718,0.0012265737,0.023926497,0.0014855413,0.0005532514,0.098356284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8798527,0.001424071,0.07153248,0.0016899485,0.00014653424,0.025558164,0.00027868958,0.00009367759,0.019423775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635031,0.032236677,0.00057287776,0.0010492523,0.0013323752,0.0013056138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97106904,0.023006087,0.0012978726,0.001415603,0.002134187,0.001077235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037115384,0.00082794775,0.00056188967,0.002148524,0.008315083,0.0039235223,0.0014783969,0.0021004805,0.0056850147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022322496,0.00063499453,0.0003024173,0.0017038503,0.008503086,0.0033299713,0.0054205307,0.0015799497,0.0006835431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019959584,0.000087864435,0.0009288844,0.0005884101,0.000005260952,0.00056684145,0.95553136,0.00012004755,0.0038482356,0.00720373,0.0031159623,0.027803792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102640326,0.00025976115,0.0031729713,0.0012716244,0.000015571095,0.00048171493,0.82361597,0.0004568878,0.00446083,0.008203332,0.15789686,0.00006180398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053887777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007882175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037115384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005696768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19628721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386419969","doi":"10.1177/14687941231196382","title":"Anti-oppression as praxis in the research field: Implementing emancipatory approaches for researchers and community partners","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Praxis; Oppression; Sociology; Transformative learning; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.9535102794223602,"score_gpt":0.7943083438193271,"score_spread":0.15920193560303308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386419969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17422046,0.0049425988,0.24946497,0.4739362,0.0020759306,0.0067691035,0.000053381333,0.0006761648,0.087861106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7672983,0.0024068013,0.1919634,0.022344174,0.00039983995,0.009246102,0.000032869193,0.00018871833,0.0061198478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.44065234,0.51606333,0.009908424,0.008580526,0.017155655,0.0076397364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51937217,0.35815457,0.023354648,0.042504493,0.02695265,0.029661583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5200463,0.0013110028,0.0014494888,0.005373404,0.039028212,0.038095698,0.0076433346,0.00891885,0.0045279395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32115763,0.0021631957,0.0015256519,0.0037194921,0.10352135,0.036592826,0.07307779,0.017901259,0.001073854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049827926,0.00039800082,0.0037895164,0.00089267915,0.00005829071,0.0003480818,0.7610769,0.0002069263,0.00093702425,0.13103174,0.0035115918,0.09769934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015749113,0.00046197049,0.0027341743,0.0032682973,0.000064953696,0.00050257996,0.6514739,0.00067832053,0.0018486398,0.2373991,0.10127315,0.00013746554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024858757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004953055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4799537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016089395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1387549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5918684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391142721","doi":"10.1177/14687941231224590","title":"Mapping working practices as systems: An analytical model for visualising findings from an institutional ethnography","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Participant observation; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.8410049251210757,"score_gpt":0.7516451382818904,"score_spread":0.08935978683918533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391142721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029979274,0.00035274628,0.9413313,0.0025082028,0.00008158157,0.0009213761,0.00040119034,0.00048687687,0.023937484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26608163,0.0005566731,0.72703964,0.00017069964,0.000028416749,0.0020010518,0.0003256549,0.00023258873,0.0035637137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833203,0.012737675,0.00069647655,0.0013055131,0.0015002802,0.000439735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97066766,0.022177838,0.001612033,0.0037108546,0.0014125028,0.00041912223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01708149,0.0011340291,0.0006600312,0.009315653,0.0030611472,0.015208312,0.0028195733,0.0022969446,0.005577862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029245477,0.0011367357,0.0017030111,0.006720716,0.013498207,0.01641316,0.007466945,0.0018482009,0.00091833045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105559215,0.00009898882,0.0056855096,0.0009694214,0.000095369,0.0005858308,0.33289856,0.014879616,0.0036307415,0.5228109,0.0026895688,0.11555004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012132421,0.00017919819,0.0039694933,0.001856048,0.00012518214,0.0008284152,0.19352138,0.08492236,0.003512588,0.5796543,0.13107137,0.00023842619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007956829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066392133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041387314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049027293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09033662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391157828","doi":"10.1177/14687941231224591","title":"Who can you trust these days?: Dealing with imposter participants during online recruitment and data collection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Data collection; Psychology; Applied psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.568417349501868,"score_gpt":0.6156968205055752,"score_spread":0.04727947100370722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391157828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5573902,0.006037887,0.19668347,0.20455863,0.0039049014,0.007726502,0.00031981064,0.0006344849,0.022744102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8838953,0.0021557424,0.065104894,0.03108168,0.0005171362,0.012496056,0.00013124998,0.0002650885,0.004352884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.54354906,0.41454253,0.011295538,0.009785566,0.013242806,0.0075845467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5705463,0.3205088,0.042042978,0.03220815,0.022229487,0.012464255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31289968,0.0014957236,0.0022073917,0.0020080674,0.027704822,0.01246308,0.006354709,0.007400488,0.006146938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46205395,0.0027014716,0.0012095384,0.0016362251,0.02595802,0.022080658,0.021013437,0.014110303,0.0021776264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017413114,0.000090210975,0.0065014223,0.00081424677,0.0000400969,0.0016838039,0.95064515,0.00008866928,0.0012481431,0.0058382503,0.0049004033,0.027975453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006876071,0.00024507698,0.0024831814,0.0035484552,0.00008983359,0.0026393805,0.9271998,0.001192172,0.0022189205,0.02020144,0.039943445,0.00016959223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005095202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008684889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6871003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071060676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021321762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84731704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395003839","doi":"10.1177/14687941241246173","title":"Affecting photos: Photographs as shared, affective ethnographic spaces","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Affect (linguistics); Ethnography; Popularity; Visual research; Sociology; Photo elicitation; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Visual culture; Extant taxon; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Art; Communication; Anthropology","score_opus":0.8133724478262857,"score_gpt":0.777889685872314,"score_spread":0.03548276195397171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395003839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89927757,0.0022781964,0.0141252,0.0035001403,0.00031795524,0.00061672454,0.00053137296,0.00011032046,0.07924249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868376,0.0009224499,0.004418307,0.00027470035,0.00005683838,0.0001863211,0.00006591117,0.000047828948,0.0053438907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897718,0.008268002,0.00015263114,0.0005208043,0.0007699646,0.00051672774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934574,0.0049322466,0.0004230748,0.0005712608,0.000349243,0.00026679304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045229215,0.00071585167,0.0002681081,0.001963409,0.0073870947,0.0048926226,0.00114232,0.0011838271,0.0039453674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009337616,0.00048927567,0.00038554464,0.0016476428,0.011985698,0.005107273,0.0048892717,0.0014920848,0.00034190225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032705586,0.000018780325,0.001271891,0.00012395205,0.0000060018538,0.0005655175,0.9822955,0.00006507204,0.0015182707,0.005503778,0.00084543746,0.0077530453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007073011,0.000038155686,0.0030202481,0.00018490158,0.000015873773,0.0005830704,0.9424444,0.000131487,0.0019031463,0.0022172304,0.049428027,0.000026445505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012003154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032403905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012003154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035198643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014662461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025538504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399589192","doi":"10.1177/14687941241259965","title":"Chasing scorpions across North Africa: Ethical reflections on life story research with Sub-Saharan migrants","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology","score_opus":0.6505494682052942,"score_gpt":0.6604122938989678,"score_spread":0.009862825693673583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399589192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93869096,0.00415908,0.004509561,0.03274047,0.00087506574,0.00037348352,0.000057951085,0.000056808425,0.01853656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98681587,0.0025279508,0.0019037649,0.0031232506,0.00019916572,0.00031401071,0.000019255638,0.00008933451,0.0050073597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94937307,0.04425707,0.0007346848,0.001057918,0.001497359,0.0030798812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436879,0.044191062,0.0040422906,0.0013997435,0.0023062942,0.004372664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03402281,0.0021509593,0.0014073565,0.0023823609,0.0416118,0.015957003,0.0036652407,0.006986049,0.0027480442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049489938,0.0014528497,0.0006801407,0.0022807894,0.045993347,0.010919829,0.017319666,0.011297689,0.00050935673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008715054,0.000007727054,0.00014760737,0.000028134522,0.0000015885827,0.0006433515,0.9975793,0.000010329681,0.00012231282,0.0005956794,0.00022736742,0.00062792056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014060959,0.000012864377,0.000115992465,0.00007296761,0.0000014581035,0.00026199777,0.9942524,0.000011745845,0.00008461268,0.00021034693,0.0049695903,0.0000045447073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008880357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018470446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0416118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008548184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008030574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17993194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401395734","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264677","title":"North-South research collaboration during complex global emergencies: Qualitative knowledge production and sharing during COVID-19","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Multinational corporation; Latin Americans; Public administration; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.7438499382076558,"score_gpt":0.737893983678502,"score_spread":0.005955954529153762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401395734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050822,0.0019225776,0.030842703,0.026702559,0.00031393376,0.0023035205,0.00032080387,0.0000842776,0.032427404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406434,0.00086991483,0.008069941,0.0015317628,0.000038137554,0.0016520856,0.000064602085,0.000056538942,0.0036526958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8858252,0.10533299,0.0013235857,0.0020064248,0.0022159296,0.0032958707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84615535,0.1356632,0.004850845,0.0043653273,0.0047262153,0.0042390367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09922499,0.0006682,0.0011386148,0.0030033847,0.018772455,0.009666217,0.0028289037,0.0033748331,0.00408589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068397805,0.00090231554,0.00074167835,0.0031601049,0.035935614,0.010566808,0.016722703,0.0050418726,0.0005623855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016115755,0.00002108669,0.00052169384,0.00010015861,0.0000026026855,0.00019212626,0.99236757,0.000055689594,0.0002564525,0.004124976,0.00028086267,0.002060711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055822275,0.000017055538,0.00027010217,0.00016083672,0.0000026208652,0.00007458738,0.99094313,0.00009667377,0.0002453566,0.0026676743,0.0055078436,0.000008594051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063587753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010536675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009789232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018163769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5247582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401395760","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264473","title":"But where's the body? Bodies, time, money, and the political economy of post-pandemic field research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; University of British Columbia; York University; Carleton University; Saint Mary's University; St. Thomas University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Notice; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Underpinning; Field research; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Political economy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.4365221344450209,"score_gpt":0.6675999920764029,"score_spread":0.23107785763138194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401395760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14713636,0.00617821,0.016150357,0.64464134,0.0029830816,0.00017995585,0.00009212789,0.000073157426,0.18256548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637058,0.0019194118,0.0043314467,0.019341687,0.0007675359,0.0002977279,0.000024889943,0.00011013024,0.009501352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88051116,0.10455136,0.0017722502,0.0025838313,0.0059056785,0.004675739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85727054,0.10211907,0.011297724,0.0072455085,0.009604475,0.012462735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10536205,0.00021069836,0.0006107707,0.0020921514,0.019879846,0.031625893,0.001787854,0.0046139825,0.006085653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11229514,0.0007432562,0.0002619532,0.0019484718,0.11210363,0.018295083,0.01144374,0.008054373,0.0010807589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075496784,0.00009400369,0.004880379,0.00028471884,0.000014053466,0.00044303658,0.3600929,0.00013539579,0.0007460096,0.58982974,0.013911977,0.029492272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043345924,0.00009397662,0.0071600666,0.0021372482,0.00001537527,0.0004178312,0.49093166,0.00017216022,0.0007086215,0.23054875,0.26768714,0.00008377653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069766385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076706535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9801202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011822292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016896013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55721444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401445786","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264458","title":"Designing afro-emancipatory qualitative research with and for Black people","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Sociology; Gender studies; Participatory action research; Epistemology; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5807845116684713,"score_gpt":0.7175607221607525,"score_spread":0.13677621049228117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401445786","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446739,0.00723519,0.38400945,0.10291821,0.0040908805,0.10754672,0.0014799777,0.0006181318,0.047427665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39648992,0.0033344375,0.3910986,0.018856708,0.0002881686,0.17690861,0.00035036937,0.00029814034,0.012374981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79584545,0.19096239,0.0028263927,0.003302428,0.0029557722,0.004107579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8250048,0.13822542,0.006267942,0.010816388,0.01312777,0.006557643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24032688,0.0013182875,0.001744374,0.0036614847,0.01761216,0.009381789,0.0038541004,0.004345519,0.009066764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14586534,0.0017466597,0.0013344517,0.002478229,0.01940849,0.008669664,0.011780335,0.008097019,0.0015791609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027821277,0.00035339076,0.0019000176,0.001684399,0.000049180726,0.0006488334,0.92054147,0.00040645423,0.0014334715,0.029684948,0.005804779,0.037214912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027972538,0.00031911096,0.0007414901,0.003408393,0.000052876832,0.00023127829,0.86242265,0.0008239458,0.0017785997,0.04600058,0.08386889,0.000072505885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060877907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0169751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7596731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098820105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032757804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9368122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406435274","doi":"10.1177/14687941241306234","title":"Indigenizing collaborative methods in studying human–water relations in the Syilx Okanagan Territory of British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.24034355422726286,"score_gpt":0.6232601032350691,"score_spread":0.38291654900780625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406435274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73226404,0.012746269,0.07898443,0.015039714,0.00036387768,0.005588277,0.0008116457,0.00018868114,0.15401314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184589,0.004397728,0.052749377,0.0013634424,0.000027890654,0.0029127826,0.00019120921,0.00009696787,0.01980169],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97745687,0.015515989,0.00052250945,0.0015918415,0.0027619936,0.00215085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827917,0.010471005,0.00069261575,0.0009679206,0.003548403,0.0015283062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021412179,0.00063863484,0.00062831497,0.0041548074,0.026828814,0.008842084,0.002820906,0.0010999485,0.0040848036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014315611,0.0005075853,0.00041632977,0.006989881,0.01773668,0.0018778114,0.0093781855,0.0019424898,0.00027488125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010250539,0.00017500493,0.018200833,0.0011594748,0.000057965444,0.0006884972,0.8299653,0.0013655776,0.0016962771,0.023934532,0.0038720674,0.11878194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035421,0.000091863694,0.023792764,0.00096755044,0.000045572076,0.000113812646,0.8925935,0.0008613306,0.00093624287,0.005206585,0.0752867,0.000068687805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96255475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07582422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07582422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17489015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55014586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410412565","doi":"10.1177/14687941251341992","title":"How can institutions better support researchers? The case of extremism and terrorism research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Violent extremism; Political science; Criminology; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.5260104981497145,"score_gpt":0.6309501166253352,"score_spread":0.10493961847562072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410412565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02486881,0.007665315,0.011184864,0.8926261,0.0025962754,0.00022348647,0.00004510521,0.00021147374,0.060578648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84629405,0.005350949,0.020314852,0.11624382,0.0022136897,0.00084678514,0.00005506004,0.00029808044,0.008382722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.66723967,0.27739802,0.006903487,0.009543602,0.012655759,0.026259454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5762966,0.25231117,0.034929987,0.045556583,0.03094507,0.05996065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21648844,0.0013579392,0.0019457901,0.0048880004,0.04023633,0.071570285,0.0074841287,0.039471872,0.0106686745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24822961,0.0020420835,0.0019118194,0.0070563112,0.11013531,0.08013163,0.05197313,0.03292806,0.0030728169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012002034,0.00034969545,0.005337879,0.00085461827,0.00012734886,0.0017732844,0.09290253,0.00097248616,0.00031770623,0.8231332,0.040598616,0.033512525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016685559,0.00021424919,0.0026046091,0.0029125276,0.00008561422,0.0007113685,0.18655932,0.00068874593,0.00048907025,0.42298338,0.382369,0.00021533125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010504484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008603098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027243895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091765024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96620923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411659748","doi":"10.1177/14687941251337243","title":"Land-based métissage: An arts-based praxis of reconciliation among humans and with the more-than-human","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Praxis; The arts; Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.2560797498543263,"score_gpt":0.586539785092461,"score_spread":0.33046003523813466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411659748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3088323,0.004104346,0.10566612,0.06970566,0.001177185,0.000676627,0.00014842757,0.0005159666,0.5091734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492392,0.00051907933,0.017881045,0.001827386,0.00013230572,0.0002663362,0.000034018507,0.000109345136,0.029991364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119264,0.007249721,0.00012958075,0.00043229412,0.00061740854,0.00037833143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218506,0.004330337,0.0006490957,0.001706206,0.0004708482,0.0006584246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773363,0.00041468735,0.0004534372,0.0012791363,0.0117504345,0.010147406,0.001850316,0.0027146384,0.0043552015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011906801,0.00028677125,0.0003652805,0.0010583275,0.04750545,0.010315556,0.013733301,0.0045177955,0.00069364446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047254096,0.00005480269,0.00069280004,0.00018017708,0.000007575118,0.0004616093,0.62904996,0.00011263554,0.0018318506,0.33983067,0.0035983596,0.024132177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026142188,0.00013837265,0.0014248698,0.0005201254,0.000009675369,0.0011596517,0.42439768,0.00043621787,0.0021803344,0.16709304,0.40257138,0.00004249322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012056155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004487019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117504345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029234553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004689935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04639852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414630040","doi":"10.1177/14687941251377267","title":"Dilemmas in embodied methods: Towards holistic description in qualitative research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Closeness; Field (mathematics); Conceptual framework","score_opus":0.9671774531523792,"score_gpt":0.8619748596545497,"score_spread":0.10520259349782957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414630040","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014945165,0.005964541,0.88429844,0.05583486,0.0010365035,0.0047498485,0.00017847189,0.00023026309,0.03276195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2901877,0.005452454,0.66103697,0.009217041,0.00040348398,0.027272325,0.00020963757,0.00039193683,0.0058284863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.42837003,0.537307,0.0092706885,0.0068189194,0.016050337,0.0021830066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56459343,0.38567904,0.01201319,0.022854617,0.011960124,0.0028996274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4225267,0.002175551,0.0027716523,0.008399972,0.0142318215,0.03461152,0.008194453,0.01011251,0.0048108986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3073452,0.002736691,0.001944034,0.008173567,0.122141674,0.032735646,0.0296978,0.012765375,0.001444429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042225245,0.000033913475,0.00032820593,0.0012110469,0.000031590644,0.0004011125,0.5076356,0.0007039408,0.00056294206,0.46997353,0.0019084921,0.017167503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007025891,0.00007183744,0.00022417142,0.0049247527,0.000033757984,0.00066737784,0.21342948,0.003061239,0.0007088232,0.69063014,0.086089015,0.000089037945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035085748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004518739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016219724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022016818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71212745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414715934","doi":"10.1177/14687941251377273","title":"From language to translanguaging in qualitative research: Exploring methodological and pedagogical possibilities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Translanguaging; Conceptualization; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Multilingualism; Frame (networking); Discipline","score_opus":0.9675376536282085,"score_gpt":0.8316695151334669,"score_spread":0.13586813849474166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414715934","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11778991,0.009798336,0.71783555,0.09865679,0.0018349712,0.004104937,0.00021629877,0.00029653992,0.049466707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80114025,0.0032145386,0.16982302,0.010167564,0.00031026918,0.011193664,0.00008987192,0.00023051664,0.0038302394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.55839115,0.42437437,0.005064344,0.0054693166,0.004207013,0.0024937475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5478674,0.4169702,0.009104909,0.014338343,0.008933276,0.0027857977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3431677,0.0015470315,0.001961484,0.0060992152,0.016400209,0.023695847,0.005223341,0.0053230403,0.005288438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2719466,0.0017233742,0.0014386935,0.0071223527,0.09003008,0.028269695,0.025821013,0.0072676754,0.00082401093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000571504,0.000026020856,0.0006233783,0.0007305121,0.000016787691,0.00029693337,0.83015406,0.00019555772,0.00041384733,0.15953699,0.00043319212,0.007515528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013463329,0.00008940619,0.00032480227,0.0037680597,0.00004342028,0.000503877,0.62484443,0.001954373,0.0012189673,0.3271309,0.039919958,0.00006709178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005041875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066899993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65683234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014383018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021170238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8099912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415819767","doi":"10.1177/14687941251390758","title":"Decolonizing methodology: Co-designing research with the voices and footprints of the community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research","topic":"Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Fundación para el futuro de Colombia; Universidad de Córdoba","keywords":"General partnership; Praxis; Variety (cybernetics); Qualitative research; Participatory action research; Focus group; Curriculum; Data collection; Qualitative property; Educational research","score_opus":0.6595775891208701,"score_gpt":0.6842154240869632,"score_spread":0.024637834966093175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415819767","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0718308,0.008054626,0.82418793,0.04205078,0.0017788531,0.015481567,0.00027654067,0.00070226233,0.035636537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27931234,0.0038589332,0.68327266,0.005693376,0.00030279942,0.022524316,0.00018843678,0.0006292636,0.0042178803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5977428,0.37010556,0.00736396,0.012957894,0.009396739,0.0024330555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62729234,0.30569795,0.008373046,0.041603383,0.012720016,0.0043133255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2729586,0.0019054555,0.0029194967,0.008764452,0.011517179,0.016947953,0.005430573,0.0047092084,0.004147319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18476145,0.002129069,0.0022684939,0.005462885,0.053329352,0.023303153,0.022092892,0.00940105,0.0016358825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014323657,0.00027032982,0.0034503937,0.0038266934,0.0001662878,0.00057851983,0.7330001,0.001078552,0.0040252837,0.112521,0.0039303685,0.13700922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020280929,0.0006939001,0.0014144862,0.008295285,0.00021721657,0.00078439177,0.5153421,0.002674166,0.0038983878,0.21257822,0.25372165,0.00017734287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024253768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044235033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72704136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007634197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035097428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89657146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}