{"meta":{"query_hash":"e4316fa671ca","filters":{"venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal"},"cohort_total":60,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":60,"exported":60,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e4316fa671ca","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Qualitative+Research+in+Organizations+and+Management+An+International+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1575947368","doi":"10.1108/qrom-10-2012-1107","title":"Not for the faint of heart","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Insider; Originality; Reflexivity; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Ethnography; Data collection; Value (mathematics); Health care; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.4313724078185576,"score_gpt":0.6716404857629721,"score_spread":0.24026807794441446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575947368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030525376,0.02106492,0.0034683151,0.7643269,0.10160593,0.00005515039,0.00021343319,0.00035853675,0.10585431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111443676,0.013964153,0.0053990246,0.5912368,0.026787562,0.00018019504,0.00029825448,0.00084914005,0.24984118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939195,0.0027438046,0.0002039707,0.0011975729,0.0013166625,0.0006185093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97993237,0.0048737335,0.0013570386,0.0030931833,0.0047669215,0.0059767333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006192347,0.00061881484,0.0010785547,0.000733799,0.0067635886,0.0078638615,0.0015412676,0.0053472137,0.053566515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0462404,0.00029979262,0.000837817,0.0004754721,0.0136435395,0.011873283,0.006736539,0.022970809,0.0304593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010642083,0.000057999943,0.00086074043,0.00024581788,0.00005313245,0.00043820692,0.0060912273,0.000045554163,0.0004682932,0.095611475,0.8468047,0.049216393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017714434,0.000038299462,0.00027917168,0.00063181284,0.00001610125,0.00073335133,0.004128701,0.00003327924,0.00015837578,0.02278565,0.9711493,0.000028329026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002827462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028304295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053566515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022998215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050408323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17919785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1912869492","doi":"10.1108/qrom-08-2012-1090","title":"Rethinking the role of roadmaps in strategic planning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Knowledge management; Legitimation; Sociology; Materiality (auditing); Mediation; Indexicality; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Politics; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.12821946301237752,"score_gpt":0.4406014752777805,"score_spread":0.31238201226540296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1912869492","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12615058,0.0022912158,0.6352683,0.033723067,0.0006146464,0.0004379959,0.00020570324,0.0006550444,0.20065343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796556,0.0007137713,0.11423037,0.00039976597,0.00005655037,0.00033291726,0.00008951609,0.00023826651,0.004283253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96438265,0.030562691,0.0007424373,0.001136673,0.002355304,0.0008202752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89981014,0.084806405,0.0027276254,0.008163919,0.0034122642,0.001079581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037616383,0.0007424258,0.00041968853,0.004552335,0.006413516,0.013873986,0.0025861508,0.0025032072,0.00700364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07319916,0.0010049533,0.00073900016,0.004558331,0.037806634,0.0310533,0.009846202,0.0045277462,0.00093079],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039321567,0.000021755624,0.0007295622,0.00023148663,0.000011039576,0.00019239605,0.094101235,0.0020837723,0.00046527956,0.84871936,0.0013758276,0.05202893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031098763,0.0000700653,0.0012192983,0.0007075104,0.000027874918,0.00030692868,0.10227561,0.01032184,0.0013900929,0.7563249,0.1272612,0.00006358812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056801946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007979282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037616383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055429996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007663046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19893682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973266242","doi":"10.1108/17465641011068839","title":"Knowledge construction and risk induction/mitigation in dialogical workgroup processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Workgroup; Dialogical self; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Originality; Sociology; Empirical research; Viewpoints; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.2040998484401182,"score_gpt":0.54410695333416,"score_spread":0.34000710489404185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973266242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82818097,0.0008223109,0.10726274,0.004387024,0.000094884956,0.0006222087,0.000031085583,0.00021133035,0.058387507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885173,0.000102780985,0.009105999,0.00010485895,0.000022714457,0.00010531123,0.000014440197,0.000016449065,0.002010084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96272665,0.03012467,0.0008027473,0.0019005169,0.0029683532,0.0014770199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418753,0.042984843,0.0069729914,0.0037284882,0.0021170527,0.0023214205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022990057,0.00073804054,0.00036603134,0.0030350233,0.010171266,0.008611431,0.00211315,0.002566311,0.004200127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04379316,0.000506166,0.0006781556,0.0011100876,0.01624348,0.0078742625,0.01298675,0.0022355427,0.000538112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018760201,0.0003824173,0.020591768,0.0004260895,0.000057528177,0.0018683961,0.8313231,0.001994336,0.0040448387,0.068319924,0.0007410387,0.07006299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008750771,0.00068016053,0.027635593,0.0009949825,0.000099972494,0.0014734376,0.7379762,0.010473646,0.006419509,0.15616433,0.057775438,0.0002191835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001770469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015209616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022990057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004020454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005401884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121584535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974273818","doi":"10.1108/17465641011089881","title":"“Adjustment” of the independent expatriate – a case study of Doug","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"International Student and Expatriate Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Expatriate; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Qualitative research; Psychology; Relation (database); Process (computing); Positivism; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science; Linguistics; Political science; Data mining","score_opus":0.1387697908341982,"score_gpt":0.5371745627707231,"score_spread":0.3984047719365249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974273818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98972565,0.00029958977,0.000628792,0.0036517228,0.00007903832,0.00011129449,0.00003131368,0.00001364482,0.0054588993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99073774,0.0006314287,0.00073758437,0.0014053255,0.00004780456,0.00012967501,0.000026592706,0.000026806902,0.006257147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936655,0.0036546383,0.00019710501,0.0005557892,0.0007026873,0.001224252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205595,0.002883379,0.0012032145,0.00054568663,0.00059877936,0.0027130248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045686285,0.00076500355,0.0010766032,0.0016288535,0.025893824,0.004679574,0.0033697225,0.00420311,0.0042586126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012565499,0.0008517619,0.00056113873,0.0025951467,0.009954801,0.0033488174,0.007043991,0.008159741,0.00069886877],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012980452,0.00071317237,0.010453763,0.0001616163,0.000014585627,0.028965035,0.94371265,0.00012731174,0.0005960813,0.0030158577,0.0029796136,0.009130395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070993883,0.0002155504,0.005709671,0.00008515412,0.000007819098,0.0043405415,0.97562873,0.00012726925,0.00021729154,0.00041723455,0.013203692,0.000039892555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030716686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05817974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030716686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057751923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005258016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061075807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976253783","doi":"10.1108/17465641011068857","title":"Making sense of sensemaking: the critical sensemaking approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":413,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Operationalization; Epistemology; Heuristic; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16006420286215006,"score_gpt":0.48494670857332667,"score_spread":0.3248825057111766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976253783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031246848,0.0057476773,0.8182564,0.022735042,0.0010460952,0.0015306404,0.0001050283,0.00021767622,0.11911458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71113586,0.0027691273,0.27809638,0.0021508606,0.00030800604,0.0015692692,0.00007731211,0.0001525081,0.0037406164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8804104,0.10208493,0.0032441993,0.0049225586,0.00752591,0.0018121087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82953835,0.14288643,0.0063818563,0.008857927,0.009573717,0.002761679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102548495,0.00216857,0.0018865796,0.01737656,0.01106479,0.026697466,0.0054727825,0.0044167135,0.0034521779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08127642,0.0013674365,0.0020627237,0.0083054,0.10860182,0.03142608,0.014325687,0.0081193345,0.00066951895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003825618,0.000053906046,0.0005824247,0.00051001925,0.000048298494,0.000219426,0.11047489,0.000835672,0.00027145594,0.8631976,0.0014359067,0.022332158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002575901,0.00002974584,0.0002700125,0.00083546364,0.000028077862,0.00017149524,0.046456914,0.0020380924,0.00046515965,0.92374235,0.02589004,0.00004687677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025309657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102548495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0152696725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014721799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5423348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994098537","doi":"10.1108/17465640710778539","title":"Deconstructing a personal “academic”/“practitioner” narrative through self‐reflexivity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Narrative; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalytic theory; Deconstruction (building); Construct (python library); Irrational number; Reading (process); Representation (politics); Order (exchange); Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13134752177962572,"score_gpt":0.4925573487816059,"score_spread":0.3612098270019802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994098537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22683367,0.0076640313,0.26810855,0.16131608,0.0029498206,0.0008075419,0.00012605333,0.00048846804,0.3317058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94359756,0.0021253165,0.028810734,0.0045012757,0.00031592225,0.00058477954,0.000058708316,0.00025704462,0.019748697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9095482,0.079817615,0.0013350272,0.0023928336,0.005276747,0.0016294488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93212235,0.049461663,0.0036952805,0.006909078,0.0054530557,0.002358492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06404729,0.0013118264,0.0009261311,0.004294618,0.014572501,0.026508568,0.0039519053,0.0054055336,0.0026039605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046899907,0.0008401705,0.0007371071,0.0026011372,0.11628853,0.02703208,0.015277317,0.01215682,0.0008458256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014323984,0.000028089999,0.00019828623,0.000092024355,0.000007000066,0.00022828569,0.5708379,0.0001646119,0.00031099454,0.42202926,0.0013973556,0.004691786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025655692,0.000075013646,0.00023231663,0.0008063304,0.000017584201,0.0005079389,0.472483,0.001422354,0.0014864287,0.2903156,0.23258229,0.000045421813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022596612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020123618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06404729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112258885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127079515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33871847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004892917","doi":"10.1108/17465640911002545","title":"Managers' motivation to evaluate subordinate performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Performance appraisal; Originality; Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Process (computing); Performance management; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Marketing; Management; Business; Creativity","score_opus":0.0860282801321137,"score_gpt":0.437580817551823,"score_spread":0.35155253741970927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004892917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98326105,0.0003714084,0.003557374,0.0009834883,0.000042567175,0.000066728884,0.000025996313,0.000050267052,0.011641221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980959,0.00006177331,0.0009071975,0.000086953725,0.000018763627,0.000031053074,0.000013905513,0.000006847944,0.0007774126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819094,0.011039707,0.00085174193,0.0006608993,0.0047387914,0.00079946435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91304535,0.04654701,0.019698111,0.0047301734,0.012175445,0.0038039396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017303484,0.00034519972,0.00032152236,0.00088273553,0.00082381617,0.0035315158,0.00054674165,0.0004164808,0.0017718332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06899252,0.00019641884,0.0002607974,0.00043580105,0.0011469121,0.0007898291,0.0013350174,0.0008922177,0.00033995617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062677095,0.00068811554,0.6297798,0.0010094316,0.00022319028,0.00039058196,0.101072066,0.0010123017,0.01443301,0.011598134,0.003399238,0.23576729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096069874,0.0016772094,0.869932,0.0005418597,0.00012989617,0.00081779837,0.07103228,0.0049768933,0.010000348,0.010243208,0.030354347,0.00019813789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008797663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007541997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017303484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013173932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015641005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09151065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013454565","doi":"10.1108/17465640810920278","title":"Managing spoiled identities: dirty workers' struggles for a favourable sense of self","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Distancing; Identity (music); Originality; Sociology; Club; Psychology of self; Construct (python library); Social identity theory; Social psychology; Social constructionism; Aesthetics; Variety (cybernetics); Value (mathematics); Categorization; Psychology; Social group; Epistemology; Computer science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Social science","score_opus":0.08756037037184386,"score_gpt":0.41069044743071,"score_spread":0.3231300770588661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013454565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96086216,0.0014669243,0.0024498987,0.0097836135,0.00031500222,0.000053608244,0.000017657245,0.000049104678,0.025002133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393624,0.0003548965,0.0006456671,0.00065390725,0.00004323747,0.000022528679,0.000010805626,0.00003002877,0.004302754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849841,0.009513826,0.00031428895,0.00070878747,0.0024574958,0.0020214566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990333,0.0040421556,0.0017146514,0.0008718699,0.00072818215,0.0023101624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009389556,0.00079245336,0.0009125289,0.0014499782,0.022210293,0.011057561,0.0022739896,0.0031530634,0.0034322094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015657635,0.00064127275,0.00059232477,0.00058800937,0.03728248,0.0053785522,0.018788438,0.007208061,0.000505197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030196135,0.000022967648,0.0033826036,0.00007178626,0.00000829455,0.001246696,0.98398143,0.000021488899,0.00047570292,0.0033107041,0.0010437794,0.0064042504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051449033,0.000053050248,0.0018036129,0.00011047915,0.0000062422655,0.0010049873,0.98090494,0.000058937385,0.00017042409,0.0017108041,0.014152441,0.000018830118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051493337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007810321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022210293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003523889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004055299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049657285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041165370","doi":"10.1108/qrom-05-2012-1063","title":"Dramaturgy in the internet era","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dramaturgy; The Internet; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Criticism; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web; History; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.07794302587076611,"score_gpt":0.41797115250966316,"score_spread":0.34002812663889703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041165370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1849207,0.017317204,0.016286386,0.11661393,0.0033070198,0.00006028305,0.00017163497,0.0002826686,0.6610402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142035,0.0032251033,0.00083251303,0.005266059,0.0005981599,0.000059341866,0.000041225747,0.0000963627,0.018461015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952034,0.0033225715,0.000089707326,0.00032141057,0.00058713346,0.00047579114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993962,0.003974363,0.00060327,0.00057984743,0.00040887785,0.00047165522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028925352,0.0002765626,0.00027246485,0.0017872611,0.009112578,0.009827397,0.0011870007,0.00237446,0.011507249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009353381,0.00018270373,0.00021633935,0.002051337,0.03304545,0.014819914,0.0077796825,0.0047578183,0.00093746465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040199167,0.000026685162,0.0006547824,0.00010404799,0.000004085358,0.00045596235,0.1392496,0.0001266611,0.0002546815,0.83356845,0.01315096,0.012363784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001190186,0.00003162834,0.0009057473,0.00039681426,0.0000075722915,0.00088646665,0.17709707,0.00031152842,0.00037861406,0.12047059,0.699474,0.000028134586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031024225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002147319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011507249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00428045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017854874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03849554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045267792","doi":"10.1108/17465641211253084","title":"Looking desperately for courage or how to study a polysemic concept","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Epistemology; Originality; Context (archaeology); Experiential learning; Cognition; Value (mathematics); Cognitive map; Sociology; Psychology; Complementarity (molecular biology); Conceptual framework; Social psychology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33910160759177105,"score_gpt":0.5833212289649001,"score_spread":0.24421962137312908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045267792","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23974559,0.012595096,0.6536639,0.027898405,0.0016722855,0.0017874357,0.000371642,0.00021100766,0.062054753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8188875,0.0031092248,0.16698462,0.003182603,0.00029635092,0.0035740216,0.000093037,0.000082279985,0.0037903117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720901,0.022697994,0.00084893877,0.0017911717,0.0021839063,0.00038783712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333099,0.053481292,0.004710279,0.004357576,0.0031811006,0.000959818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034130257,0.0008566027,0.0011803837,0.0035697,0.0035706293,0.0077059376,0.0014001202,0.0014833644,0.0045592943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045468666,0.0003326024,0.0006847529,0.0032304109,0.020573292,0.013796948,0.004216773,0.0028493109,0.00034101677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011532342,0.00016925599,0.005449935,0.0026230884,0.00014253381,0.00035106292,0.22600181,0.0003760435,0.0025503705,0.6389297,0.0016085791,0.12168228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041200066,0.00031263515,0.0047049443,0.0021299736,0.00011623534,0.0005898385,0.21902359,0.002145881,0.0025905168,0.7041632,0.0640597,0.00012236969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010125474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013721472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034130257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025029227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041880286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18050021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048774437","doi":"10.1108/17465641311327531","title":"From bricolage to thickness: making the most of the messiness of research narratives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bricolage; Narrative; Originality; Context (archaeology); Action research; Sociology; Action (physics); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6510056867167279,"score_gpt":0.7281197567201022,"score_spread":0.07711407000337434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048774437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57954895,0.0135360425,0.21346055,0.0845898,0.0019930166,0.0013057458,0.00043001698,0.0010074772,0.10412832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97054243,0.0022910447,0.020981349,0.0017429073,0.00022911001,0.00038020193,0.00008590839,0.00036120316,0.0033859056],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91927725,0.066565916,0.002760406,0.0034330438,0.006306691,0.0016567034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82094836,0.14151387,0.012696447,0.016283717,0.006148489,0.0024091862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056817073,0.0014734041,0.0011722757,0.007240314,0.014729187,0.032474056,0.0032091285,0.0028983445,0.0038607991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13763283,0.0017592484,0.00086029834,0.005132918,0.06036356,0.05269495,0.024948707,0.005530277,0.00067993655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096335985,0.000010268402,0.0016436629,0.0003295223,0.000022254479,0.0004340247,0.930784,0.00016664538,0.00066791073,0.046915837,0.0012019838,0.01772762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026786143,0.00005944925,0.0013522415,0.0018135089,0.000059177797,0.00074609567,0.8201464,0.0007956263,0.0013880112,0.094411135,0.079110466,0.00009122687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029062803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00351959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94318295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008383949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006322816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30048096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057658825","doi":"10.1108/17465641111129362","title":"Subjective personal introspection in action‐oriented research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Originality; Reflexivity; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Action research; Qualitative research; Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.23179474264670938,"score_gpt":0.47900244192297764,"score_spread":0.24720769927626826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057658825","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151491,0.0037518712,0.63425213,0.019271094,0.0013302686,0.0044773915,0.00015370527,0.00068079616,0.12093363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90654576,0.0008416256,0.081819095,0.0033958636,0.00024458533,0.004219928,0.000075202726,0.00019957522,0.0026584244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6305328,0.33788884,0.006481959,0.007276144,0.01573944,0.0020808512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45129588,0.45648342,0.02494084,0.043105878,0.020401321,0.0037726092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21930282,0.001703813,0.0011145826,0.006524814,0.0061731795,0.015631156,0.0038502025,0.0033180332,0.0033670529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2509811,0.0014137068,0.0013174603,0.0029623653,0.08017869,0.014694531,0.016782507,0.006499458,0.0005786954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010531373,0.00015373308,0.0063866787,0.0013615788,0.00008641567,0.00041079355,0.7185159,0.00093950686,0.0011844068,0.23225698,0.0012188195,0.03737987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014099161,0.00062724407,0.0065360176,0.0054604197,0.00014212276,0.0014244621,0.3788323,0.0061712335,0.0047242544,0.50716543,0.088487975,0.00028744683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015252031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012343733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21930282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007258605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009127513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96273863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083045877","doi":"10.1108/17465641011042008","title":"Managerial narratives: a critical dialogical approach to managerial identity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Narrative; Identity (music); Sociology; Epistemology; Ideology; Narrative identity; Organizational identity; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09709666471515069,"score_gpt":0.4513707750729643,"score_spread":0.35427411035781364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083045877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13314922,0.018485354,0.29470074,0.09283965,0.0018943703,0.0007948254,0.00025026838,0.00026577778,0.4576198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95910406,0.0025849948,0.028065909,0.0018115379,0.00031071587,0.00045162826,0.000052962856,0.00007071975,0.007547412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769497,0.02050754,0.00038924703,0.000622271,0.0009925936,0.00053871534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716826,0.022659292,0.002043148,0.0010781059,0.0015386364,0.0009981615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019983854,0.0010134088,0.0005097723,0.004432578,0.0108066425,0.016724491,0.0020874615,0.002938916,0.0032108587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022111226,0.00047375247,0.00047789118,0.0024950122,0.047616404,0.018013325,0.008205944,0.004816831,0.00036484998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022791763,0.000013089157,0.00029540676,0.00013760774,0.0000057752864,0.00026631018,0.3620271,0.00017720011,0.00024102889,0.6300275,0.0012270939,0.00555915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026761316,0.00005152469,0.0005360615,0.0011107194,0.00001663522,0.0005397136,0.4070668,0.0015918273,0.0007975868,0.42935777,0.15886468,0.000039960658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031149683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028131544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019983854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00954783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063741077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10568601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088196052","doi":"10.1108/17465641211253075","title":"Notes from the field on organizational shadowing as framing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Foregrounding; Originality; Sociology; Epistemology; Toolbox; Operationalization; Knowledge management; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science; Linguistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09173448154263622,"score_gpt":0.44426191892109906,"score_spread":0.3525274373784628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088196052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062958956,0.057185628,0.025313428,0.5146523,0.01327811,0.00030589997,0.00039240764,0.00011777989,0.32579544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64781696,0.06428903,0.018810563,0.16275685,0.008368068,0.00084665953,0.00021117645,0.00043097188,0.09646988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98705846,0.009780665,0.00032164576,0.00065568124,0.0014714876,0.0007119264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94125915,0.052258108,0.0012563645,0.0017685749,0.0025774073,0.00088043645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014715851,0.0009781435,0.0006272736,0.0028644376,0.014081172,0.008476337,0.0016931664,0.0045867697,0.007394729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023524279,0.0005801002,0.0005129158,0.0038272187,0.030529372,0.014137825,0.0064148135,0.012418672,0.0010278393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008282746,0.000043087104,0.000714643,0.00041079847,0.000007798656,0.0011530922,0.39832836,0.00021271505,0.0007118963,0.45170325,0.11618734,0.030444238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015313139,0.000032432385,0.0007745064,0.0012832367,0.0000052526184,0.00035980972,0.13635606,0.00013435763,0.00040771122,0.055786103,0.8048051,0.00004012603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017446237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019577079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017446237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006669869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005076777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077825785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093319198","doi":"10.1108/qrom-09-2012-1099","title":"Ethical issues in shadowing research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Confidentiality; Engineering ethics; Objectivity (philosophy); Informed consent; Originality; Field (mathematics); Research ethics; Contingency; Ethical issues; Sociology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Epistemology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.48109860979897207,"score_gpt":0.7144630246025859,"score_spread":0.23336441480361386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093319198","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04992648,0.020234508,0.54501224,0.19906309,0.009474184,0.0052321013,0.00023568123,0.00037339062,0.17044833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6456921,0.007437627,0.2672348,0.044640608,0.0030261662,0.013081001,0.00014905194,0.00057794317,0.018160611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.44866595,0.5025622,0.008589867,0.011536255,0.0254914,0.0031544096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3841728,0.5038603,0.02082618,0.062158916,0.024363162,0.0046186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32367975,0.0013232353,0.0016121101,0.00431695,0.020624744,0.017858788,0.004624897,0.0091220075,0.008481413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.354902,0.001370349,0.0014148159,0.0054473085,0.08923048,0.018213697,0.017426752,0.011810911,0.0021172462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008727276,0.000077017794,0.0028186587,0.0012432734,0.000049565784,0.0008711938,0.32269418,0.00050418236,0.0010824908,0.59242713,0.014311368,0.06383359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059044083,0.00014112098,0.0013801773,0.004630459,0.000036555975,0.0014809569,0.1416333,0.0013191623,0.0017377406,0.4716609,0.37583238,0.00008831184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031925512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046006343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67632025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009938596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019402148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163683857","doi":"10.1108/17465640810870373","title":"Competitive advantage as a legitimacy‐creating process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Construct (python library); Competitive advantage; Value (mathematics); Originality; Business; Process (computing); Marketing; Institutional theory; Industrial organization; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Qualitative research; Management; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.12644994348579566,"score_gpt":0.4829268237621164,"score_spread":0.35647688027632074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163683857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2443753,0.0007842733,0.07580842,0.012962198,0.00020580683,0.0003157922,0.000037481244,0.00013302355,0.6653777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99016935,0.00009756531,0.0053749075,0.00018624884,0.000029454715,0.00005671213,0.000010768925,0.000019423278,0.0040555065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860043,0.008699594,0.00030606755,0.001120193,0.002871845,0.0009980041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753308,0.016873818,0.0021426764,0.0023822153,0.0020334064,0.0012369856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012520631,0.0003914366,0.0004093319,0.0027967908,0.0077475347,0.012772914,0.0011668607,0.0023260277,0.0072434233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019244796,0.0002742436,0.00045611802,0.00166187,0.043540016,0.008587832,0.007391198,0.0022809163,0.0006321104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018388822,0.00003760127,0.0013550989,0.000048707203,0.0000061379815,0.00024901924,0.032407824,0.00019693054,0.00064449955,0.9538756,0.0004940841,0.010666101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054172342,0.00013893204,0.0033713868,0.00027181036,0.000028598048,0.0005019647,0.050450187,0.002482666,0.0014893432,0.8169187,0.12423122,0.000061096325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025020598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027808736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012772914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005161305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006869537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06621617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210220126","doi":"10.1108/qrom-03-2014-1205","title":"Value co-creation and stakeholder complexity: what strategy can learn from churches","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Service and Product Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Mainstream; Originality; Co-creation; Knowledge management; Business value; Stakeholder analysis; Process (computing); Exploratory research; Empirical research; Sociology; Computer science; Public relations; Epistemology; Economics; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.37778252080502106,"score_gpt":0.4875992823217041,"score_spread":0.10981676151668301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210220126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22272852,0.047747407,0.021647325,0.55015874,0.002454249,0.00012414296,0.00007734809,0.00008369364,0.15497859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95017225,0.016692739,0.0065738587,0.014366449,0.0004400063,0.00007085701,0.000052928834,0.000067030946,0.011563802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958467,0.0028651783,0.00008862278,0.00025301814,0.00038915116,0.00055730203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988439,0.0069052214,0.0006156376,0.0008936847,0.0011215416,0.0020248892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074045663,0.00057689456,0.00064550806,0.0012136595,0.006797374,0.009257927,0.0015141468,0.0039148685,0.006043476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011046763,0.00026673893,0.00042053332,0.0010750833,0.017197005,0.018589726,0.006653591,0.005861525,0.000909169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008393446,0.00033858555,0.009093916,0.0011430141,0.000038820835,0.0020741718,0.41808784,0.00042044785,0.00089930865,0.3611359,0.026122259,0.18056183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022058273,0.00009441848,0.0032360516,0.0033940757,0.000019152283,0.00087552675,0.45351642,0.0007924127,0.001007679,0.24686402,0.29011828,0.000059933907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007423751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017818362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009257927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006769982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03969145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227600792","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2015-1310","title":"What we can learn from de-valued and marginalised work/research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Situated; Sociology; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Embodied cognition; Reflexivity; Qualitative research; Value (mathematics); Insider; Ambivalence; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3424374004976452,"score_gpt":0.5923825284541586,"score_spread":0.2499451279565134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227600792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018827926,0.196588,0.024343781,0.6690842,0.017852966,0.00024120045,0.00022302462,0.00040428241,0.07243461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4067008,0.30741292,0.0574487,0.18682611,0.015972536,0.0012169564,0.00043688514,0.0009409763,0.023044145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9109332,0.07147057,0.0025761926,0.003707521,0.007690111,0.0036223133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79182136,0.1667273,0.0052646105,0.01614268,0.0117907,0.008253304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081005365,0.0014225235,0.0025687914,0.0047913934,0.012311392,0.041931484,0.0050992426,0.011522418,0.008406091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11889504,0.0011161142,0.0018556507,0.004609745,0.06394989,0.059885878,0.024463676,0.018444309,0.0038458067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009985745,0.00014700704,0.0020279817,0.011421851,0.00012050277,0.0025262441,0.49872604,0.0002306424,0.000661792,0.20062415,0.08280107,0.20061287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024760546,0.00008738791,0.00060986704,0.013773558,0.000047687936,0.0014890427,0.26957515,0.00010438138,0.00045162716,0.20539136,0.5083729,0.000072372415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033382964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007501938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081005365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008920274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024193028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42840242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265348044","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2015-1304","title":"Reflections on the socio-politics of qualitative research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Originality; Qualitative research; Grounded theory; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Identification (biology); Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Focus (optics); Social science; Knowledge production; Engineering ethics; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.48318402584099895,"score_gpt":0.5892051168896637,"score_spread":0.10602109104866475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265348044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054375064,0.0070462353,0.018959492,0.94589025,0.005268712,0.00028841512,0.00007932944,0.000046234163,0.016983792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44559038,0.023012603,0.06285729,0.43713316,0.0067318715,0.00434502,0.00011829062,0.00060737715,0.019604038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4677567,0.48797122,0.008178964,0.0067250454,0.023242354,0.0061257323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2374714,0.72378105,0.0064840466,0.008421707,0.019545926,0.0042959945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37276724,0.001198935,0.0016337227,0.0035269374,0.021155464,0.028331356,0.006182495,0.01781158,0.007818629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3391675,0.002136398,0.0023928748,0.003821654,0.11567516,0.036848348,0.01654963,0.043711107,0.0013511846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096915675,0.00006722525,0.0005789575,0.0010897545,0.000031920405,0.00093223824,0.3633184,0.0005340238,0.000472452,0.5757297,0.03955436,0.01759411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007375041,0.00008808242,0.00036695972,0.0061243917,0.000019658457,0.000879545,0.23949578,0.0007965302,0.0008675551,0.23912704,0.51204485,0.00011582258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103964545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00964123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6272328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030712288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025919672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77348965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507711397","doi":"10.1108/qrom-05-2016-1384","title":"A comment to Gobo: the next challenge – from mixed to merged methods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Mainstream; Space (punctuation); Qualitative research; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Data science; Qualitative property; Management science; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Knowledge management; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.21758304527500982,"score_gpt":0.4995037923983181,"score_spread":0.2819207471233083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507711397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019760583,0.00066742586,0.0004976687,0.9835586,0.014347498,0.000030168163,0.00004908278,0.00005418863,0.00059779733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002250204,0.0004800746,0.0015089711,0.98858786,0.0043645687,0.00014819046,0.000021282185,0.00007944381,0.0025593822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96246344,0.019356653,0.002770977,0.00518539,0.008334022,0.0018896438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80818033,0.12501813,0.008357485,0.0053056674,0.04464758,0.008490703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046262354,0.0015440938,0.001833338,0.0030388664,0.010300126,0.0072222287,0.0060489867,0.028707648,0.012825831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2422058,0.00084723835,0.0025569338,0.0030343973,0.019023499,0.018877922,0.009754773,0.054309454,0.008361375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071768525,0.00001812595,0.00040342435,0.00035288013,0.00001621745,0.0003527213,0.0034620566,0.000050769057,0.00021024313,0.013195596,0.9760977,0.0057685454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059273178,0.000054707743,0.0010168819,0.002113963,0.000035853278,0.00089727197,0.011353749,0.00030805625,0.0005640671,0.02507766,0.9583433,0.00017525537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02670365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023278413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046262354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008988873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018025689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24466163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515104604","doi":"10.1108/qrom-09-2015-1326","title":"Self-initiated expatriation: changing the ontological and methodological box","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"International Student and Expatriate Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Expatriate; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Originality; Structural functionalism; Epistemology; Actor–network theory; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Management science; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research; Philosophy; Engineering; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.39597446125280505,"score_gpt":0.5818943883542081,"score_spread":0.1859199271014031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515104604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15257883,0.019671328,0.40523282,0.26545843,0.007052928,0.0007586301,0.00016504791,0.00017553841,0.14890638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977966,0.008470047,0.07160139,0.0098002665,0.0012542906,0.0018616484,0.00007211314,0.00013915305,0.009004477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96387964,0.030968938,0.0008421426,0.0014135713,0.0022091032,0.0006865463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916698,0.066566356,0.0029696494,0.0061778077,0.0055899494,0.0019981985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06470756,0.00063230825,0.0009608123,0.0049665086,0.00736729,0.012319489,0.0043688985,0.005025156,0.0028732836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05279332,0.0005115328,0.00069085514,0.0043411264,0.06604126,0.024537405,0.012528191,0.008279718,0.00037389647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012187043,0.000025135587,0.00049077574,0.00017068122,0.0000037000566,0.00007438946,0.04035758,0.00011059701,0.000055191314,0.95037216,0.0008055417,0.0075220023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024668985,0.000073218274,0.0011106465,0.0026892738,0.00002261492,0.0004050029,0.16228631,0.002587319,0.00046228222,0.6865613,0.14372425,0.000053101725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033841499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053845476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06470756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084876185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012965046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3422104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534490849","doi":"10.1108/qrom-02-2016-1367","title":"The Politics of Public Sector Performance: Pockets of Effectiveness in Developing Countries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public sector; Developing country; Business; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.19268691690690576,"score_gpt":0.5436419936813399,"score_spread":0.35095507677443416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2534490849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86555076,0.0066639287,0.0009105748,0.05563602,0.00010038973,0.00007794633,0.00028270046,0.0000142297795,0.0707635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987489,0.0004886543,0.000048725607,0.00038789542,0.000014311633,0.000017023305,0.000010827546,0.0000046325777,0.00027903658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594437,0.031024246,0.0010254271,0.00079623575,0.0028464552,0.004863927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79720783,0.17030478,0.0139440885,0.0043579997,0.0077248495,0.0064605116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05333328,0.00029415256,0.0008538662,0.0045062103,0.0070947115,0.01096875,0.0011883168,0.0015059176,0.0059802276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09061278,0.00051215367,0.0002961033,0.008976045,0.020940335,0.006847451,0.007184146,0.0030583357,0.00021963193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081052404,0.00039629076,0.24359085,0.0015637031,0.00023488331,0.0003529752,0.3759345,0.0010285212,0.0005485049,0.2521513,0.0077745398,0.11561342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008626305,0.00020669465,0.31613633,0.00227593,0.00019641272,0.00011787276,0.6235758,0.0005346914,0.0010125558,0.03074114,0.025053998,0.00006226872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02196954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025544832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05333328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018098127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022283433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28205675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538377812","doi":"10.1108/qrom-01-2016-1351","title":"The critical incident technique reappraised","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Critical Incident Technique; Transformational leadership; Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Organizational theory; Public relations; Organizational behavior; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Business; Management; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering; Marketing; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.13629083750711088,"score_gpt":0.5751578290247623,"score_spread":0.4388669915176514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538377812","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008706023,0.012529656,0.84564024,0.01582071,0.0053834314,0.005364876,0.0005566935,0.0017828896,0.10421564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17834088,0.011861482,0.75760025,0.009171256,0.002551083,0.008896905,0.00048060584,0.0009905135,0.030107014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87825584,0.08062441,0.00811061,0.0076842373,0.02344338,0.0018814923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82145894,0.10058429,0.013192497,0.031248754,0.030954247,0.0025612633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05307288,0.0018845065,0.0013828125,0.012165138,0.005032101,0.015853044,0.004646201,0.004510103,0.009334484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102009274,0.0010821847,0.001382295,0.009135857,0.017357526,0.0139385285,0.01333404,0.008034993,0.005406915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023003023,0.00015728074,0.0032628772,0.0043697734,0.00009369081,0.00085370877,0.051907595,0.0008150478,0.004551405,0.27630815,0.024753762,0.6326967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055130164,0.0003005143,0.0023811804,0.010886717,0.000093021554,0.0044410494,0.031710807,0.0020080341,0.0049810302,0.12950008,0.81343347,0.00020898816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002416143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022997262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05307288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005902652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013004807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28067958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587003640","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2015-1298","title":"Words fly away, writings remain – paradoxes in and around documents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Originality; Value (mathematics); GRASP; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Management science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.09343252256260687,"score_gpt":0.4570769055072323,"score_spread":0.3636443829446254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587003640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42645258,0.03414753,0.15233207,0.16756266,0.0038962723,0.0006501889,0.0006985658,0.0006214159,0.21363865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591328,0.0037277902,0.024165297,0.0039515994,0.00045190484,0.0002456848,0.00013428154,0.00031064815,0.007880038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9314178,0.049548183,0.0027368225,0.0041037663,0.0107268365,0.0014664895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8189011,0.13383004,0.013738465,0.017982645,0.012324079,0.003223641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039109368,0.0008006518,0.00097234745,0.006463848,0.013186586,0.03055377,0.0026790993,0.003222907,0.0047858483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11179871,0.00073969946,0.00081308495,0.007839935,0.057279628,0.036735702,0.01046162,0.006877531,0.0010381993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100341436,0.000052199826,0.0030070427,0.00069417607,0.00004773539,0.0007693683,0.37367725,0.00047470475,0.00082725426,0.567277,0.005869029,0.047203884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029887571,0.000052166273,0.0021086049,0.0010530383,0.000029504261,0.00070175814,0.24137723,0.0007036083,0.000931727,0.5795571,0.1733514,0.000103954095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003442876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029809477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039109368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092555955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010107047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20683259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587652219","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2016-1393","title":"ANTi-History, relationalism and the historic turn in management and organization studies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.14082970869955086,"score_gpt":0.43912618446377516,"score_spread":0.2982964757642243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587652219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28121215,0.046320327,0.121457174,0.070920855,0.0015727535,0.00028876262,0.00012497263,0.00013565458,0.47796735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98883075,0.0029571634,0.0042726016,0.0009912996,0.000120503,0.00007037799,0.000017840559,0.00003546314,0.0027041454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98514926,0.012566396,0.0002675618,0.00072138757,0.0007895241,0.0005059415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639338,0.029237662,0.0024861384,0.0027108425,0.0009515943,0.00067987177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0191921,0.00038413532,0.00041089064,0.0036257487,0.0066841324,0.010480429,0.0013192376,0.0014291077,0.004077439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02048889,0.0004376741,0.0003018766,0.0031340385,0.07502345,0.015917195,0.0066159414,0.0035867011,0.00018062447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012830695,0.000012720385,0.0015947598,0.00015084705,0.000006571333,0.00008462551,0.116514556,0.000111613794,0.0001171264,0.87254816,0.00052902603,0.008317198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014578699,0.000056915935,0.0032533742,0.0013434704,0.000023392984,0.00041098412,0.2265625,0.000533089,0.0006692187,0.6343997,0.13270327,0.00002947341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004544815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068158386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0191921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087901205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042082584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10149872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610357655","doi":"10.1108/qrom-06-2016-1389","title":"ANTi-History and the entrepreneurial work of privateers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Originality; Business history; Context (archaeology); Colonialism; Sociology; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Situated; Social history (medicine); Historical method; Political history; Law; History; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08301499172661825,"score_gpt":0.4066229724722112,"score_spread":0.32360798074559294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610357655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72435147,0.0025737723,0.007127559,0.010904208,0.00017362651,0.0000263982,0.000017153441,0.000027140724,0.2547986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949004,0.00027518425,0.0002422832,0.00011646025,0.000020465712,0.0000036769784,0.0000027389215,0.000007656541,0.004431112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961826,0.0026908587,0.00007840234,0.000260975,0.00039153293,0.00039557758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99349445,0.0039836396,0.0011287834,0.0006107548,0.0002931387,0.00048927666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004391786,0.00022096843,0.000193685,0.0014369839,0.008593627,0.008338037,0.0006292924,0.0008398732,0.0038062748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005605787,0.00022958769,0.00010119293,0.0010601636,0.044405192,0.00659484,0.004037351,0.001594713,0.00018184171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020070796,0.000027021346,0.0039075497,0.000058726517,0.0000043380023,0.00037010617,0.45443118,0.00013041704,0.00035641162,0.52724016,0.00081776263,0.012636275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010844303,0.00006103596,0.008363346,0.0003427868,0.000011032726,0.00089129,0.5852483,0.0006709696,0.00084351527,0.14527212,0.25825396,0.000030785697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003990485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059166113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008593627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038247618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021650512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02775067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619535338","doi":"10.1108/qrom-09-2016-1411","title":"Big Ideas in Social Science","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.38887122430943255,"score_gpt":0.6289454357617654,"score_spread":0.24007421145233288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619535338","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035469905,0.046593983,0.47498158,0.25791752,0.007262412,0.0010239211,0.00096177886,0.0006016521,0.17518722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8058831,0.013925559,0.14282276,0.013864695,0.004096553,0.0037640694,0.0004365779,0.00032762645,0.014879043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9512865,0.038334165,0.0017836764,0.002005488,0.005829734,0.00076041924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67677397,0.30020806,0.00300473,0.012556887,0.0043015513,0.003154751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05853851,0.0009679635,0.0022739863,0.008136114,0.0061459746,0.014151337,0.002106568,0.005542346,0.010307526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07723674,0.0012128165,0.0011703188,0.0069443015,0.048185308,0.028902896,0.00926175,0.00977057,0.0011066952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007908621,0.000020787496,0.00028693135,0.00024219303,0.000017194272,0.00003565829,0.004573431,0.00019042208,0.000038450235,0.9832501,0.0023333996,0.009003615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069540333,0.000003519605,0.000093523886,0.00012928914,0.000003164705,0.000013390603,0.0010900343,0.00030216467,0.000024909574,0.992687,0.0056427172,0.0000033757865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011585029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001084356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05853851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006517406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007729516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30958492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752945450","doi":"10.1108/qrom-11-2016-1459","title":"From bread-maker to bomb-builder","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Identity (music); Historiography; Narrative; Gender studies; Originality; Sociology; Workforce; Deconstruction (building); Negotiation; Media studies; Qualitative research; Social science; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.3511192287371008,"score_gpt":0.571489935156775,"score_spread":0.22037070641967427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752945450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53918654,0.006520067,0.003429815,0.015774628,0.0007543248,0.00010625238,0.00043749245,0.00010882936,0.43368208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347243,0.002276935,0.0010683027,0.0013821371,0.00006327844,0.000026026895,0.00011126853,0.000096379044,0.060251366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863106,0.00028061835,0.000018254848,0.00017390888,0.00038948894,0.0005066042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.0002006257,0.00007152581,0.000056409644,0.0001833187,0.00032792796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012269737,0.00045319932,0.0002847478,0.0010561565,0.018485224,0.00766286,0.00090575585,0.00082903483,0.013819675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019509456,0.00025080628,0.00015177982,0.0016422771,0.012619678,0.0024682002,0.003724073,0.0022895813,0.0011021502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013785245,0.000047429963,0.013123915,0.00020611893,0.000008011084,0.0013425179,0.8015797,0.000100492,0.0019855353,0.09386735,0.022988962,0.06461206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032534153,0.00003774091,0.011329218,0.00024195656,0.000005757631,0.00035939564,0.5503539,0.00003781577,0.0005924929,0.0022784583,0.4347415,0.000018548002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5592475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67741096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5592475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017241953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011236124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88669634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786354665","doi":"10.1108/qrom-10-2016-1447","title":"A novice reflects on The Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Psychology; Reflective practice; Qualitative research; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5202603623740771,"score_gpt":0.7000410029416144,"score_spread":0.1797806405675373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786354665","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013160445,0.06036732,0.5593808,0.17872888,0.010497515,0.001222428,0.000094626914,0.00095151825,0.17559648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24219379,0.057408802,0.55381453,0.061306935,0.0047363434,0.0032648358,0.0001896194,0.0013350709,0.07574999],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9000668,0.08918905,0.0019225123,0.0018760385,0.006055707,0.00088993047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82670707,0.15533207,0.0038009428,0.005785816,0.0063236505,0.0020504752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047751218,0.0010326722,0.0010182128,0.0020609314,0.0062325345,0.013865826,0.002938212,0.0061857514,0.0023212214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077570096,0.0014618246,0.0007980471,0.0021195717,0.04062765,0.022000479,0.0075489483,0.014613019,0.0019724155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004644194,0.00008660128,0.00057249505,0.0016055553,0.000061521176,0.0010690547,0.43968004,0.0004743318,0.0019267952,0.3684293,0.07139454,0.11465329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037593094,0.0001764927,0.0007488491,0.005116326,0.00004046399,0.002739265,0.08912889,0.0012276184,0.0020157243,0.2559576,0.6426752,0.00013604056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013612587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026561313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035519793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060638613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25253558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802184936","doi":"10.1108/qrom-06-2017-1538","title":"Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in management studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deductive reasoning; Originality; Inductive reasoning; Value (mathematics); Publishing; Deductive method; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Qualitative research; Linguistics; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.42386100894599754,"score_gpt":0.593462187428316,"score_spread":0.16960117848231848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802184936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081723444,0.08900397,0.5872848,0.0829447,0.016758757,0.05669747,0.0006969447,0.0009734607,0.0839165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47494707,0.014255114,0.4530291,0.013875895,0.003410273,0.038380478,0.00023284082,0.00039546486,0.0014738267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.105630554,0.78847754,0.04853264,0.008658541,0.046691924,0.0020088023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.024204884,0.8832344,0.022728404,0.022953331,0.045047995,0.0018310073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.76172394,0.0020190254,0.00495612,0.028451424,0.00878406,0.03792638,0.007597657,0.007113399,0.006026129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88864917,0.0021078256,0.0035490151,0.019991476,0.036986146,0.02820203,0.021456424,0.0068906825,0.0012317965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018185221,0.0007562694,0.0178128,0.079738766,0.0025861848,0.0006100478,0.14983934,0.002034617,0.0017224252,0.38024974,0.009125814,0.35370547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020446961,0.0030162768,0.011298961,0.10639601,0.0042214454,0.0010106874,0.12028892,0.009858815,0.009108389,0.58489233,0.14720872,0.0006547594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015132813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018331732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23827606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025646983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031475227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2938369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883710249","doi":"10.1108/qrom-10-2016-1454","title":"A reflexive critique of a critical hermeneutics analysis of Wu Zetian","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Reflexivity; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Exposition (narrative); Critical theory; Politics; Value (mathematics); Originality; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research; Computer science; History; Political science; Law; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36251349390211235,"score_gpt":0.6640605124304133,"score_spread":0.30154701852830096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883710249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05099174,0.013084489,0.16263275,0.5895785,0.011453061,0.00072059,0.0001924636,0.00030105095,0.17104536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8978649,0.0031741944,0.035210192,0.042887982,0.0018026417,0.0015900469,0.000052858,0.00035799382,0.017059136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9120946,0.06767037,0.0025949485,0.005203236,0.010742447,0.0016944065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86598724,0.10873857,0.0041240104,0.008425755,0.011510372,0.0012141364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07530452,0.0009962684,0.001035987,0.005285409,0.01161318,0.014912196,0.0035996141,0.007256111,0.003033579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12715377,0.0006600778,0.0008317038,0.0034853166,0.09905894,0.017823804,0.008418134,0.01281845,0.00065285136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015171976,0.0000074595764,0.000113266666,0.00015819576,0.000005777115,0.00012450117,0.119650625,0.00008410146,0.00010740925,0.86832577,0.006573533,0.004834152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025152118,0.000022438062,0.0002524092,0.0016722456,0.000020052827,0.00033515185,0.084382504,0.0006676761,0.0013137064,0.53999394,0.37127274,0.000041982872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005899385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049887225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07530452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015839353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016144244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39825314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902179859","doi":"10.1108/qrom-05-2018-1645","title":"Critical sensemaking: challenges and promises","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Originality; Management science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.1759382070411723,"score_gpt":0.48079168933685607,"score_spread":0.30485348229568376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902179859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046435893,0.15947665,0.07373085,0.5843286,0.0059983125,0.000507646,0.00015681556,0.00020958901,0.1291557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86945796,0.058634713,0.037391815,0.02468275,0.003925672,0.001063434,0.000087052475,0.0001572278,0.004599438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88159406,0.08871397,0.0043010716,0.006620359,0.015646802,0.0031237325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5616649,0.37465262,0.012416614,0.020517237,0.024565123,0.0061836126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15376195,0.0010962455,0.0020994083,0.0098128375,0.013440124,0.032848917,0.005843564,0.0074017844,0.0055753286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17455362,0.00081215875,0.0013575851,0.00854941,0.10184228,0.04958006,0.016344313,0.010181357,0.0010272783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058498463,0.00007052414,0.0022126762,0.0028344344,0.000038371,0.00024441097,0.090973265,0.00034965077,0.00019752802,0.77140343,0.008374291,0.12324283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016060147,0.000059955546,0.0008883197,0.0066025434,0.000019599822,0.00041909263,0.17163816,0.0006163988,0.0002530002,0.71431047,0.105115674,0.000060658815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034524077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00311817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15376195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012628498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024727685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8131807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902551872","doi":"10.1108/qrom-03-2017-1511","title":"An open letter to the Universe: a reflection on conducting “good” research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Reflexivity; Indigenous; Originality; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Power (physics); White (mutation); Qualitative research; Aesthetics; Universe; Media studies; Computer science; Gender studies; Social science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7297725144228154,"score_gpt":0.7109577647291687,"score_spread":0.018814749693646715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902551872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06695708,0.004697139,0.042614713,0.8219338,0.032567568,0.0010649193,0.00011033567,0.0005239889,0.029530447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59538126,0.0046387394,0.045420475,0.30999148,0.007100531,0.0027933498,0.00008572981,0.0015774525,0.033010967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.55826855,0.38810778,0.010259294,0.008665073,0.026334507,0.008364844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53498626,0.35372603,0.01703314,0.031889737,0.043269027,0.019095832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17040668,0.001564744,0.0026395745,0.0017614983,0.048490103,0.031690132,0.006043514,0.029768977,0.0047837505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39572635,0.0020835428,0.0028177947,0.0020884364,0.057193432,0.02745402,0.021627696,0.043099195,0.0019797045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012843726,0.00012251188,0.000451785,0.0006429739,0.000027800994,0.004953167,0.84729296,0.00043969147,0.002176547,0.06440564,0.064491995,0.014866419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024407798,0.00017262381,0.00027156607,0.0018503688,0.000017173963,0.0022441142,0.41168082,0.00060098973,0.0009795608,0.027774239,0.5542276,0.00015660346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004981076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028805865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016634202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025157858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90120745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904326757","doi":"10.1108/qrom-03-2018-1621","title":"Visualizing community pride: engaging community through photo- and video-voice methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Royal Roads University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Visual research; Originality; Emic and etic; Belongingness; Sociology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Community engagement; Citizen journalism; Identity (music); Participatory action research; Construct (python library); Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8093301708856412,"score_gpt":0.7731602778144592,"score_spread":0.03616989307118201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904326757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5759238,0.0019574778,0.2651097,0.0063764784,0.0005171759,0.004006067,0.0008076479,0.00091000047,0.14439163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88805395,0.00047392416,0.10245367,0.0005226739,0.00008384766,0.001773874,0.00012183533,0.0001447987,0.0063714436],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883627,0.009788144,0.00013506944,0.0005504538,0.0007537309,0.00040998418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760869,0.019695733,0.0009821848,0.0015115822,0.0010123919,0.0007112172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012095172,0.00065636623,0.00031295785,0.0030390052,0.0031156628,0.005107036,0.0015791646,0.001479623,0.0068293507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016276529,0.00037872343,0.0004892314,0.0014781,0.005427548,0.0043231156,0.006153488,0.0012861895,0.000680555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005792181,0.00066538074,0.012339695,0.0024993494,0.00009733738,0.0010862282,0.609624,0.0022521007,0.015817644,0.03943235,0.008442134,0.30716458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043993612,0.0012482123,0.019275859,0.0028278786,0.00017749007,0.0014077921,0.6479425,0.012854513,0.022409083,0.05730845,0.23379916,0.00030916583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024718447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060241674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012095172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014412641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018200714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063966155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965416670","doi":"10.1108/qrom-11-2018-1696","title":"Identity, agency and institutional work in higher education: a qualitative meta-synthesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Managerialism; Public relations; Originality; Autonomy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.22189821343795071,"score_gpt":0.4712293078687717,"score_spread":0.249331094430821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965416670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30159393,0.52137333,0.08739961,0.029396228,0.0025104391,0.018855095,0.010497541,0.00020738607,0.02816639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83021045,0.098958425,0.045838904,0.0051178196,0.00017872307,0.015533156,0.0016806326,0.00013093266,0.0023509504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.961559,0.030024024,0.003500498,0.0013815792,0.0026885106,0.00084646675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85584635,0.1278101,0.0036913753,0.004384984,0.0076604933,0.0006066963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074238874,0.000945062,0.002625074,0.012676277,0.0029969837,0.0077609657,0.0021619229,0.0018816475,0.0053004967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098349325,0.0007960265,0.003477819,0.013387099,0.004819714,0.0076675285,0.0049327514,0.0025337143,0.0003407565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069065386,0.00029728754,0.012074459,0.26005694,0.005741229,0.0010386711,0.4625247,0.0025603692,0.0012853746,0.07262247,0.008372254,0.1727356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019439418,0.00047985977,0.00951199,0.31920257,0.008799762,0.00056771986,0.49780366,0.0014335964,0.0019001885,0.04063437,0.11931975,0.00015212971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068860045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012182025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074238874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015126544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016038228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3926174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973519705","doi":"10.1108/qrom-02-2019-1735","title":"Precarious work, harassment, and the erosion of employment standards","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto; York University; St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Redress; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Labour law; Precarious work; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Power (physics); Work (physics); Public administration; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.07675902129915108,"score_gpt":0.5150374239708488,"score_spread":0.43827840267169776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973519705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871551,0.0007101113,0.00036838505,0.0019088087,0.000024064577,0.000017490915,0.000016067472,0.000005233571,0.009794808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988305,0.00021355881,0.000042668606,0.00011673991,0.000003141447,0.000004338584,0.0000052184055,0.0000019591034,0.00078187743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937696,0.0023637163,0.00017312879,0.00029076272,0.0015090492,0.0018937783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932232,0.0019075639,0.002085975,0.00037393172,0.0009398612,0.0014694425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033081262,0.0002392403,0.00037868955,0.0009167905,0.019110186,0.004769259,0.0013084799,0.0009433203,0.0020219483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008336575,0.00031499425,0.00017954715,0.0010911006,0.030704064,0.0014720066,0.0044892817,0.0019123335,0.00011361856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025558664,0.000017497745,0.033719838,0.00004918642,0.000006716952,0.0006179025,0.9536638,0.000050961786,0.00026742282,0.0045024795,0.00072198996,0.0063566878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024112783,0.00002195158,0.027526213,0.00012913956,0.0000039391593,0.00018412956,0.9610725,0.000038686157,0.00009272444,0.0005673599,0.010342512,0.000018399114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.752111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8323794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.752111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024739722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02809002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4986977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975795239","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2018-1666","title":"Reframing research in Indigenous countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Cognitive reframing; Originality; Colonialism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Sovereignty; Qualitative research; Traditional knowledge; Environmental ethics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09828913484015075,"score_gpt":0.5392096224212771,"score_spread":0.44092048758112634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975795239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26667094,0.04856384,0.06608807,0.18967961,0.008000106,0.0012285793,0.00009607787,0.00021695334,0.41945592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411836,0.009843939,0.022010017,0.012836652,0.00057476497,0.00082848436,0.000030158208,0.00009307089,0.012599291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8441678,0.14054541,0.0023827085,0.0037538803,0.004850635,0.0042996337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.890247,0.08815722,0.0039570564,0.007987698,0.006175296,0.0034758658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.092501774,0.0008513299,0.0016566988,0.0048297676,0.030136991,0.02028478,0.0035671943,0.005824641,0.003946537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05941059,0.00067810644,0.0010438164,0.0050653494,0.10041739,0.02299667,0.028200308,0.011046945,0.00048158038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084041185,0.000021430522,0.00044077646,0.0002538646,0.0000101442065,0.00046686098,0.7736249,0.000084140505,0.0001946269,0.21730639,0.0010802037,0.006508268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010100798,0.00004941968,0.00049976126,0.0015605872,0.000020020707,0.00048697524,0.7586337,0.00019006678,0.0002665436,0.11804895,0.12020106,0.000032804583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020901144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022091502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90749824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019378144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026538664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48920196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982311807","doi":"10.1108/qrom-04-2019-1748","title":"Shifting practise: recognizing Indigenous rights holders in research ethics review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Community College; University of Prince Edward Island; Mount Saint Vincent University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Research ethics; Political science; Corporate governance; Indigenous rights; Traditional knowledge; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Human rights; Law; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.3432297224054247,"score_gpt":0.6155564645765382,"score_spread":0.2723267421711135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982311807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056788236,0.013552842,0.16971676,0.687225,0.005793248,0.0016626196,0.000023220564,0.0003604687,0.064877726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7623371,0.005757259,0.12563913,0.09192124,0.0026726827,0.0025256246,0.000036243837,0.0003820583,0.00872858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.34932294,0.5760746,0.018517626,0.017420148,0.029669516,0.008995214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3302861,0.5454362,0.022785578,0.04621963,0.035288423,0.019984053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5174577,0.00088431686,0.0014137035,0.0042354953,0.03263444,0.030595766,0.0055748955,0.014933255,0.0028101213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3851173,0.0017622154,0.0012225728,0.0034179287,0.17146006,0.036774784,0.047470313,0.034823656,0.0010788554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027639453,0.00006703183,0.0016596891,0.00060792477,0.000043769203,0.0007890744,0.75268245,0.00028753508,0.0010795443,0.19256672,0.0077917143,0.04239697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057208814,0.0001566595,0.0013803139,0.0051120077,0.000045061795,0.0021184003,0.3633752,0.0012196024,0.001136077,0.35339463,0.27178723,0.0002175256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008217416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012624253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020014003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1006903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5950606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991977237","doi":"10.1108/qrom-04-2018-1625","title":"Unsociable speech","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Operationalization; Emic and etic; Originality; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.11302727207040464,"score_gpt":0.5482678995112223,"score_spread":0.4352406274408177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991977237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83005065,0.0043896623,0.0097694695,0.007657131,0.000697635,0.00021305497,0.0018303498,0.0005620424,0.14483006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97854716,0.001158793,0.0010024966,0.0009070831,0.000094151364,0.00006574781,0.00032264023,0.000063386025,0.017838562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973935,0.0006350707,0.0001476176,0.00022619235,0.0011375208,0.00046008735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891587,0.0028683909,0.0029458262,0.001007154,0.0023080965,0.0017118555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016558297,0.000247964,0.00019909027,0.0009829112,0.0028988007,0.0022376634,0.0007360114,0.00055467576,0.009874241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012303874,0.00009904453,0.00014309931,0.0007759487,0.003986433,0.0012605691,0.0029170783,0.0007967743,0.0019754807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006092724,0.0001576814,0.18256544,0.0013403244,0.000077162345,0.007558075,0.24085051,0.0007155098,0.016947243,0.03523889,0.06862867,0.44531116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023670913,0.0003105483,0.22541332,0.0020637524,0.00006731952,0.010289229,0.24740057,0.0009183695,0.008426191,0.010031776,0.49487388,0.00018130151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0643747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07175756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0643747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029521554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004137238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12799996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999649168","doi":"10.1108/qrom-04-2019-1754","title":"Indigenous works and two eyed seeing: mapping the case for indigenous-led research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Participatory action research; Originality; Traditional knowledge; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Corporate governance; Action research; Discipline; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Social science; Qualitative research; Anthropology; Management; Engineering; Ecology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.14608996945719846,"score_gpt":0.532966110550297,"score_spread":0.38687614109309854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999649168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50296766,0.0036145882,0.030621625,0.079897776,0.0006492378,0.0007657566,0.00005783101,0.00017107274,0.38125443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98283666,0.00068733713,0.005419233,0.0018119805,0.000039233248,0.0002545511,0.000011759552,0.00007931504,0.008859839],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91608953,0.06691673,0.00093868765,0.003438918,0.0058770394,0.0067390944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93284345,0.04877853,0.0027823914,0.0074689407,0.003499739,0.0046269726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047293242,0.0005101677,0.0008490984,0.0038323596,0.042132534,0.021179963,0.0045929784,0.008115119,0.0071966425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053378392,0.0008592194,0.001195806,0.003392357,0.06871088,0.016886644,0.026271991,0.01101464,0.0008129579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021530766,0.0000527729,0.0012590972,0.00018651254,0.000006100662,0.0015529385,0.8910598,0.000079325226,0.0002753269,0.092309505,0.001328511,0.011868678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006930108,0.000023336333,0.0008450506,0.00039456494,0.000007956813,0.0008915441,0.91365725,0.00018638247,0.00022553916,0.029111959,0.05462796,0.000021563716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025506219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037885908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95786744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014364738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02578898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2501136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011717502","doi":"10.1108/qrom-03-2020-858","title":"Editors’ note on special issue on indigenous knowledges, priorities and processes in qualitative research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Qualitative research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.35434739287901973,"score_gpt":0.6438313087582892,"score_spread":0.28948391587926947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011717502","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004053827,0.0011001693,0.0004268021,0.06377774,0.9337378,0.000054877783,0.00005327537,0.000060577328,0.0007482385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007660037,0.0024064826,0.00094570976,0.068096116,0.9196978,0.0002200858,0.000063148014,0.0001459176,0.007658741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696518,0.009450518,0.0045388313,0.003836482,0.010604431,0.0019179211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78479666,0.112336166,0.010874105,0.006879154,0.073089145,0.012024833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04658379,0.002509652,0.0036069707,0.0038738635,0.0050933,0.0138796745,0.005596855,0.015284943,0.030277323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15241373,0.0015632027,0.0037207203,0.0018700297,0.00615205,0.011129331,0.007115878,0.021302696,0.01247953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018845765,0.0000137400775,0.000053546744,0.00020356866,0.000006010437,0.00005419318,0.0001557612,0.000013277597,0.000079038524,0.0005963323,0.9931445,0.0056611625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003117852,0.000034785866,0.00033233373,0.0009480001,0.000020898478,0.00020374251,0.00040881315,0.00014927788,0.00016920014,0.001993605,0.99567115,0.00003703936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023693554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004294175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04658379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044388995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007465076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24636155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016531424","doi":"10.1108/qrom-12-2018-1708","title":"A spectacle of otherness: an autoethnography of a conference presentation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Originality; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Feeling; Spectacle; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Media studies; Psychology; Visual arts; Gender studies; Social science; Qualitative research; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.30278655450793174,"score_gpt":0.5775465922008157,"score_spread":0.274760037692884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016531424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013779,0.0016278519,0.020928422,0.012282392,0.0009584736,0.0009963446,0.00055070827,0.00036765845,0.06091019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96499646,0.0010127006,0.006414984,0.0021225193,0.00028639025,0.0006144404,0.00024818737,0.0005662064,0.023738137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97480744,0.02088704,0.00035310147,0.0013417343,0.0013571994,0.0012534482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975868,0.016828198,0.0009671775,0.0019991556,0.0018356082,0.0025018752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011029693,0.0012455033,0.0009929853,0.0019466041,0.017384183,0.009298721,0.00213584,0.0036969201,0.0065687816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025036737,0.0007111019,0.0008540575,0.0015213629,0.0118206935,0.004960428,0.009165542,0.008140606,0.0021150785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071228504,0.00016280099,0.00094985566,0.00016645045,0.00001394107,0.0012556595,0.9802828,0.00019683446,0.0018004546,0.0038410355,0.0039794664,0.0072794943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018781846,0.00013408047,0.0010763949,0.00044788176,0.000017750153,0.0010463466,0.90367645,0.0006026695,0.0021964193,0.0020694688,0.08863107,0.00008265612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034445256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067987195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042186556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034314883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05833125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042785723","doi":"10.1108/qrom-03-2020-1904","title":"Integrated sustainable supply chain management and firm performance in the Indian textile industry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Textile industry; Textile; Originality; Structural equation modeling; Industrial organization; Marketing; Strategic management; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.053304191996918895,"score_gpt":0.3716992594060404,"score_spread":0.31839506740912155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042785723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930769,0.00014283526,0.00027356937,0.00031743618,0.0000035938654,0.000014618129,0.00003084658,0.000008020937,0.0061322376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.000048202848,0.000109254834,0.00000999958,0.0000013783131,0.0000019660167,0.000014253994,6.764554e-7,0.00024253881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982768,0.0005722698,0.00011225595,0.00012776873,0.0005604005,0.00035055025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909745,0.0025271773,0.003749267,0.00034236573,0.0013377196,0.0010688916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002275865,0.00022558511,0.00019477803,0.0013074895,0.0009766853,0.0041921353,0.00037726332,0.00034440518,0.0024705718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005212292,0.000095977215,0.00025319934,0.0028209102,0.0012812214,0.0013642899,0.0022271432,0.00067799597,0.00022097204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017630759,0.00070287695,0.8880654,0.0003355354,0.00016905267,0.0006450992,0.00979625,0.006936746,0.0025437903,0.0056788228,0.0006725358,0.084277526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007776134,0.00055748015,0.9516992,0.00018763465,0.00008211203,0.0001978631,0.034539364,0.005767983,0.0016512645,0.0023991745,0.0028624008,0.000047733647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007697395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011424143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007697395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025670265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025953243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01862514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047106860","doi":"10.1108/qrom-01-2020-1887","title":"Organizational memorialization: spatial history and legitimation as chiasms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Memorialization; Legitimacy; Sociology; Conceptualization; Organizational studies; Comparative historical research; Value (mathematics); Organizational space; Organization studies; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Organizational culture; Public relations; Law; Politics; Organizational engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.10781131909000698,"score_gpt":0.39866694126848023,"score_spread":0.29085562217847327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047106860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57843214,0.0046126386,0.0456014,0.02376925,0.00057447853,0.00012140244,0.000079953126,0.00019397131,0.34661478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968028,0.00019875466,0.0007245758,0.0001073316,0.00003255801,0.000012724804,0.000007548737,0.0000120213435,0.0021016905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938916,0.004073964,0.00016011637,0.00043411204,0.000773421,0.0006668381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830998,0.0099964645,0.0021765025,0.002319842,0.0012237667,0.0011835883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008316868,0.00030263796,0.0004244314,0.0030116446,0.008383648,0.011717546,0.0010828143,0.0016084871,0.006222212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022582611,0.00030237087,0.00032128335,0.002482638,0.07173793,0.013297265,0.008855207,0.0026451629,0.0002910208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034857145,0.0000180182,0.0030632545,0.00009363847,0.000007900018,0.0003118857,0.15099017,0.00025210227,0.00026755215,0.8303912,0.0007232639,0.013846128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036002843,0.0001525379,0.009439786,0.0006426326,0.000034757948,0.0009881606,0.34112874,0.0010251167,0.0009753362,0.46741712,0.17807855,0.00008139002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004984991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004913515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011717546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007227137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004618777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05243683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132248582","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2020-1984","title":"Zebras showing their stripes: a critical sense-making study of women CSR leaders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Scholarship; Status quo; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Originality; Public relations; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.21517630478930214,"score_gpt":0.5002267693868265,"score_spread":0.28505046459752437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132248582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97067565,0.0009214713,0.00491951,0.0077721686,0.00031293023,0.00022647534,0.00005505398,0.000055897657,0.015060908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096686,0.00046676374,0.0013589982,0.0012715069,0.000057358986,0.00015257747,0.000025119032,0.00007887741,0.0056217657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451,0.011663258,0.0002581432,0.0009223348,0.0011811663,0.001465074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977137,0.016081184,0.001783855,0.00076914515,0.0023142265,0.001914646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014488185,0.0011043372,0.0012291683,0.0039478266,0.019758577,0.011862602,0.0021511745,0.002460906,0.003033751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028202778,0.0009868301,0.0005706928,0.0020659145,0.025687626,0.008675244,0.008951122,0.0059037516,0.0005942032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010158663,0.000015129205,0.00049052277,0.000022824492,0.000001676225,0.00017960268,0.99616516,0.0000074073855,0.00022829032,0.0009106505,0.0002928266,0.0016757104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016739949,0.000019832496,0.00030392516,0.000044814515,0.0000016816241,0.00006509054,0.99355894,0.000025411064,0.00014197394,0.00051020697,0.0053199427,0.000006519469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055494327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009198103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019758577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045950147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006200449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07662177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137982371","doi":"10.1108/qrom-04-2020-1916","title":"Non-Indigenous partner perspectives on Indigenous peoples' involvement in renewable energy: exploring reconciliation as relationships of accountability or status quo innocence?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Waterloo; York University; Cape Breton University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Climate justice; Accountability; Status quo; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Climate change; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.1572953998960797,"score_gpt":0.41750478388066253,"score_spread":0.2602093839845828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137982371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956936,0.0015737419,0.0015487871,0.0063504293,0.00010917591,0.000042183972,0.000020956995,0.000015072979,0.033403605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717146,0.00048116257,0.00024008771,0.0003611863,0.000009459291,0.000014575734,0.0000052692735,0.0000072735597,0.001709506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98955476,0.00664086,0.00021600281,0.00047902027,0.0011501327,0.0019592452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218565,0.004180808,0.0009045396,0.00043109918,0.0008158098,0.0014821684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011060569,0.00035843733,0.0006195909,0.0011942583,0.016907755,0.008307458,0.0014511261,0.0018166889,0.004536791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01310236,0.00034244114,0.00034427881,0.0016586226,0.019711383,0.0057534045,0.011451003,0.0032899715,0.00022275677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068846525,0.000008480641,0.0022110094,0.00003576549,0.0000036083684,0.00027471525,0.9899839,0.000012562715,0.000095102805,0.0047083437,0.00015518363,0.0025043688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010881176,0.000008503035,0.0009790963,0.00006724316,0.0000032705118,0.00009378694,0.9926294,0.000025265846,0.000040106035,0.00082083873,0.0053255833,0.000005839405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09396555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124941796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09396555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006071223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012759625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18683726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212917181","doi":"10.1108/qrom-08-2020-2005","title":"The ethics of service work in a neoliberal healthcare context: doing embodied and “dirty” emotional labor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional labor; Dirt; Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Health care; Originality; Sociology; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Marketing; Qualitative research; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.16478167764369087,"score_gpt":0.5518397910520693,"score_spread":0.38705811340837837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212917181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62181133,0.0049198065,0.043388687,0.086475484,0.0009690964,0.00023692894,0.000032178883,0.00006092187,0.24210547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943657,0.00037562355,0.0015539658,0.001562197,0.000041484618,0.000048195798,0.000004008799,0.000016189158,0.0020326388],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95648634,0.03774748,0.0005235017,0.0008564289,0.002029857,0.002356505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97721684,0.015513243,0.0020968108,0.0015941157,0.0013762636,0.0022028377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01799599,0.00036256053,0.00045894395,0.0011161418,0.013452611,0.012629402,0.0014302003,0.003187943,0.002567769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015899496,0.000320156,0.0004063139,0.0011291745,0.097184785,0.0067367014,0.010573626,0.004543605,0.000345907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033702516,0.000052490857,0.002515311,0.00016743338,0.000009274885,0.00066255673,0.74372137,0.00020639683,0.00031505406,0.24205443,0.0017612193,0.008500808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016645183,0.00004344701,0.0016722839,0.0005176101,0.0000061100272,0.0005966349,0.84558326,0.0004715393,0.00030567232,0.08499391,0.06576799,0.000024874753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040976927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040439116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01799599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010143024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01168157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09517306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200316467","doi":"10.1108/qrom-10-2020-2051","title":"The extended late career phase – examining senior nursing professionals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Qualitative research; Originality; Career Pathways; Psychology; Nursing; Narrative inquiry; Career management; Sociology; Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.5053121730931717,"score_gpt":0.6425187252647563,"score_spread":0.13720655217158462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200316467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876236,0.0023810738,0.0013218338,0.0015405435,0.000101873295,0.000048029655,0.00006255102,0.0000057984817,0.006914734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955023,0.0014535864,0.0006771916,0.00044674022,0.000019495921,0.00005481628,0.000052526557,0.0000059217614,0.0017874738],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974005,0.0015709308,0.00013395605,0.00016600755,0.00031263803,0.00041598515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947456,0.0025401388,0.00079506007,0.00017119851,0.0006676574,0.0010802973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069862246,0.00024196069,0.00028714113,0.001081556,0.0034242691,0.0033367912,0.00052226963,0.00060370966,0.0018459468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007882339,0.00021731015,0.00022413624,0.0009244468,0.003231962,0.003084824,0.004347787,0.0009413555,0.00020242317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039780796,0.000024429643,0.018115666,0.00030433192,0.0000051979496,0.0005912217,0.9607662,0.000033815304,0.0005547084,0.003323306,0.0009739281,0.015267524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018709371,0.000053064716,0.012795021,0.00047118278,0.0000040817936,0.00046089356,0.96475476,0.00006626937,0.0001974525,0.0009865246,0.020195616,0.0000131994575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006627763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011305528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069862246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002739997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005164354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03694713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220869720","doi":"10.1108/qrom-11-2021-2250","title":"Investigating vicarious trauma: dramaturgical challenges for qualitative research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dramaturgy; Storytelling; Originality; Impression management; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Qualitative research; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Aesthetics; Narrative; Visual arts; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.2825124022189047,"score_gpt":0.5173666714128335,"score_spread":0.23485426919392882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220869720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38940158,0.021003302,0.34157982,0.11693084,0.0029368787,0.015137108,0.0023505078,0.0004777125,0.11018237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85969114,0.0059014233,0.095369324,0.009435593,0.00042339065,0.023414418,0.00035501455,0.0002498354,0.0051598833],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.78783554,0.19704062,0.004095614,0.0034197653,0.0049028737,0.0027056108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70867556,0.2603531,0.008781614,0.012316266,0.0070306323,0.0028428496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16340199,0.0009208013,0.0017152842,0.0060533118,0.01668886,0.017466282,0.00515931,0.0039814245,0.008252566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14102155,0.0010375254,0.0008441818,0.008521389,0.041371558,0.01562669,0.01752662,0.0054876814,0.0008292474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032379943,0.000045991386,0.0009842771,0.0012705498,0.000013388189,0.0004291121,0.91691715,0.00014409001,0.00038120037,0.066223495,0.0016155547,0.01194289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013849431,0.000039244864,0.0004171427,0.0018528091,0.000010114349,0.0003370765,0.93819994,0.00032318555,0.0002639684,0.027743185,0.03078106,0.000018387558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004497684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073750494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83659804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013540937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013215265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8641627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223992316","doi":"10.1108/qrom-01-2022-2278","title":"Leading with two eyes: leadership failures and possibilities in the management of a pulp mill’s wicked problem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Wicked problem; Indigenous; Originality; Mill; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Collective action; Political science; Management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Economics; Social science; Qualitative research; History","score_opus":0.10819413299550364,"score_gpt":0.41161722089162533,"score_spread":0.3034230878961217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223992316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82912785,0.0037198367,0.03136753,0.06198533,0.0006253692,0.00023209282,0.000036416564,0.00017411438,0.07273152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910653,0.00033127662,0.0041612918,0.0012988551,0.00003111508,0.000032140822,0.000007652454,0.000031559954,0.0030408087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622743,0.02248869,0.0008798863,0.0022089751,0.0066517172,0.005496537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96549827,0.021112332,0.0039433273,0.0019650504,0.0026747962,0.0048061986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025306351,0.000631032,0.0006597171,0.002289918,0.035552114,0.020435082,0.003318218,0.003549838,0.003436033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029659463,0.0006434467,0.00059070677,0.0017364325,0.041752722,0.010696644,0.012341667,0.009610206,0.00036182886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003151044,0.00007615698,0.005565134,0.00018475384,0.000020844258,0.003469701,0.9060537,0.00030035048,0.0005593883,0.055572186,0.0037275183,0.024438743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005376958,0.00003586884,0.0014204888,0.00019417361,0.000009008413,0.0006643344,0.9563612,0.00050824,0.00032376795,0.01681935,0.023615327,0.00004283671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027699582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060035735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035552114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014982638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028000522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13383442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283453137","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2021-2175","title":"Conforming to and resisting imposed identities – an autoethnography on academic motherhood","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Becton Dickinson (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Sociology; Resistance (ecology); Sensibility; Gender studies; Originality; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Norm (philosophy); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.31917770710110144,"score_gpt":0.5381184166809972,"score_spread":0.2189407095798958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283453137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539283,0.0011040919,0.011533937,0.0058672987,0.00032326754,0.00029928228,0.00014519197,0.000078451514,0.026720256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97778535,0.0010554512,0.0034605444,0.0013115037,0.000082732106,0.00025383642,0.000073518226,0.00010383633,0.0158733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973364,0.008593035,0.0001484167,0.00046598865,0.00046512374,0.0005938939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918749,0.005931312,0.00048313246,0.0008088573,0.000435216,0.0004666473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007907804,0.0006403148,0.00057546346,0.0010360043,0.008158625,0.005121112,0.0012109465,0.0015319393,0.0031726286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011109093,0.00046154912,0.00033739978,0.00067731756,0.011261841,0.0034652082,0.0064970697,0.002844823,0.00070952094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026718177,0.000037723144,0.0012928688,0.000058304293,0.000004211028,0.00060850603,0.9856954,0.000042571595,0.0009334102,0.0050328737,0.00087832526,0.0053890445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064384267,0.000047654903,0.0012670888,0.00022125487,0.0000065778977,0.00078624074,0.94913673,0.00016058197,0.0010612267,0.002241332,0.045049142,0.000015757601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029435179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005461613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026521285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025503312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041821003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382004350","doi":"10.1108/qrom-10-2021-2220","title":"On- and off-duty conduct(or): a feminist critical discourse analysis of two dismissals of a railway worker","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Masculinity; Originality; Resistance (ecology); Duty; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Hegemony; Law; Dismissal; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3841113459984354,"score_gpt":0.5974837311507138,"score_spread":0.21337238515227847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382004350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9069221,0.0028970318,0.008013521,0.021796718,0.00061823556,0.00016598361,0.0001555618,0.000059176728,0.059371788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98593557,0.00078469794,0.0013877138,0.0014165146,0.0001716204,0.00009387382,0.000054689684,0.000115585215,0.010039766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869277,0.009968052,0.00026490935,0.0008276006,0.0011400614,0.00087165966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97570693,0.020598566,0.0012810468,0.0005333781,0.0011326986,0.0007474503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012873287,0.0013059382,0.00083918683,0.0029227454,0.020798171,0.010880988,0.0025282898,0.0046924646,0.0040985686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587447,0.0005685206,0.00042138222,0.0016375037,0.036740977,0.00948057,0.008010254,0.0068620327,0.0004761102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017302924,0.000010742001,0.00023376064,0.00004810991,0.0000014799997,0.0003809135,0.9906295,0.000013086106,0.00031971742,0.006655936,0.0004578352,0.0012316593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002259366,0.000011834089,0.00039338187,0.00020895302,0.000003375048,0.0001799447,0.97540057,0.000057418754,0.0003304812,0.0011034814,0.022300873,0.0000074004083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009702299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014422284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020798171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044049136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071300864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385423441","doi":"10.1108/qrom-12-2022-2456","title":"A story-net approach to qualitative research: having tea with stories!","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Storytelling; Colonialism; Originality; Sociology; Traditional knowledge; Value (mathematics); Plot (graphics); Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Aesthetics; Qualitative research; History; Social science; Literature; Computer science; Art; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6068120022531015,"score_gpt":0.6897746029799446,"score_spread":0.08296260072684314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385423441","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14283086,0.011045627,0.5251011,0.14572278,0.0056270924,0.009610887,0.0028848515,0.0010761141,0.15610062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6722603,0.0057516648,0.26393515,0.013238895,0.0006742204,0.020520333,0.0007260977,0.0006237544,0.02226961],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89867866,0.09495894,0.0011030178,0.001673787,0.002339337,0.0012462782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8843813,0.097149126,0.0036002418,0.006553218,0.005006446,0.0033096236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06536765,0.0011634313,0.0011371255,0.0049752207,0.014362712,0.018575843,0.004241557,0.0036588293,0.010319057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06337651,0.0010801305,0.0009318899,0.005706416,0.03410988,0.023784654,0.016209379,0.0065491702,0.001718019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006953016,0.000058762103,0.0007139208,0.0010838801,0.000022324815,0.0004996241,0.8439855,0.00029125618,0.00049163686,0.119572386,0.00836956,0.02484168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003371011,0.000082961385,0.00039600258,0.002202396,0.000019955252,0.0005945576,0.7379134,0.00097609044,0.0006614924,0.090670206,0.16640265,0.000046569483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031582233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007110752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93463236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084556155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008128757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34570128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392887716","doi":"10.1108/qrom-08-2022-2379","title":"<i>Relations of subordination</i>: Canada’s first indigenous dean of a law school","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subaltern; Sociology; Indigenous; Privilege (computing); Subordination (linguistics); Originality; Gender studies; Value (mathematics); Narrative; Institution; Power (physics); Law; Social science; Political science; Politics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.05131683684028305,"score_gpt":0.3912522767030193,"score_spread":0.3399354398627363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392887716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310507,0.000918913,0.00072305405,0.021674756,0.00025639555,0.000075059565,0.000089836074,0.000045128494,0.045166064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97383773,0.0003831372,0.00041526352,0.0019922263,0.000021257658,0.00001633021,0.000018994588,0.00002060764,0.02329453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963882,0.0007598276,0.00005658016,0.000381686,0.00070672383,0.0017070714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392444,0.00081835873,0.00037697595,0.00013599358,0.0013870182,0.0033572102],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021736948,0.00025629997,0.00032696495,0.0011123201,0.05451128,0.0074558323,0.0020465993,0.0018833946,0.004671439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043669203,0.0003069572,0.0001642791,0.0015468443,0.018350558,0.0016320164,0.004304351,0.004741481,0.00038359044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046520607,0.000050837963,0.012543447,0.00006913342,0.000006052056,0.0023700895,0.9393373,0.00011274249,0.0014037308,0.019037325,0.012591844,0.012430983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020742893,0.000020792639,0.0077123,0.000070309194,0.0000049555983,0.0003211678,0.897323,0.00008025926,0.00047764997,0.0004421713,0.09351061,0.000034804478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96688485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11313678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124822125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8208687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399262168","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2023-2556","title":"Past is prologue: from human relations to social exchange theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prologue; Social exchange theory; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.11235301022251341,"score_gpt":0.46041764440641153,"score_spread":0.3480646341838981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399262168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082899354,0.03758328,0.098665446,0.11192571,0.0028415686,0.00023292091,0.0004495645,0.0001344039,0.66526777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669299,0.0087699145,0.008823501,0.002213889,0.0005761159,0.00018050693,0.00012861124,0.000055939454,0.012321713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938233,0.005016409,0.00012178015,0.00042261113,0.00043407598,0.00018180907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879046,0.009787364,0.00060308154,0.0007358484,0.00048990356,0.0004792039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008840237,0.0004249097,0.0004985304,0.0033868675,0.006352319,0.00816428,0.0013150577,0.0017383537,0.008720214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009407496,0.0002264277,0.0003337245,0.0026570787,0.029431757,0.013371085,0.00332236,0.0040160837,0.00054729515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000980235,0.000015881646,0.0003908599,0.00008927291,0.00000409406,0.00005971158,0.018738067,0.00012799236,0.000021939803,0.972064,0.0017383401,0.0067401445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007988739,0.00002929925,0.0007463728,0.00054227875,0.0000065827544,0.00016819441,0.023374802,0.000808169,0.00007883347,0.89690363,0.07732269,0.000011151551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003103393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028059727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008840237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006314625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029629683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046752155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401025003","doi":"10.1108/qrom-12-2023-2640","title":"Does kindness matter? Discourses on kindness during the pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Acadia University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Pandemic; Sociology; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political science; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.13039901418484864,"score_gpt":0.5572502790051711,"score_spread":0.42685126482032243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401025003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8499086,0.006029191,0.011425376,0.06843083,0.0012886302,0.000106279294,0.00006331421,0.00008866766,0.06265906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966492,0.0005634223,0.00056620606,0.0012442933,0.00008675403,0.00002442193,0.0000117808095,0.000021764861,0.0008321781],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97830164,0.018431626,0.000434405,0.00072397693,0.0010360171,0.0010723161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525178,0.040345814,0.0023709543,0.0012624472,0.0013652946,0.0021377543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020948403,0.00074220897,0.0007342936,0.0020604224,0.01960864,0.008254514,0.0012888109,0.004287587,0.0021238865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03820183,0.0005156425,0.00047953095,0.0013577556,0.05723781,0.017117418,0.011762762,0.0071646306,0.0001746822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014189701,0.000005855451,0.00058923307,0.000056210483,0.0000027634594,0.00046199514,0.97036093,0.000034099266,0.00020904177,0.02596429,0.00054992974,0.0017513824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004698183,0.000017906723,0.0006058257,0.000275348,0.0000045635775,0.00049128936,0.95204765,0.00013534562,0.00023550999,0.014406451,0.031752534,0.000022903832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002756668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020948403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004645547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034025868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110787034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406230064","doi":"10.1108/qrom-08-2024-2801","title":"Methodological reflections on tracing networked images","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Originality; Visual research; Representation (politics); Value (mathematics); Tracing; Masculinity; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts; Social science; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.9048770149811757,"score_gpt":0.8074382154978831,"score_spread":0.09743879948329259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406230064","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24363068,0.005143162,0.42369044,0.091778204,0.002597871,0.0032705208,0.00061782746,0.0004995004,0.22877187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87954086,0.0020305805,0.087200865,0.0060621873,0.0003478999,0.0042863875,0.00014375227,0.00073829247,0.019649161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86925364,0.115142316,0.002184407,0.0048194416,0.006226634,0.0023736367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7871964,0.17651878,0.0045533166,0.019361315,0.010869698,0.0015004574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1032258,0.0012988849,0.0008213209,0.0051877364,0.013994163,0.01820018,0.00518782,0.0042885398,0.0134759825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14532107,0.0009212466,0.0009666599,0.0037769563,0.06419115,0.023559777,0.020151503,0.00776584,0.0015440071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049728133,0.000038023052,0.00059193885,0.00048438957,0.000008796594,0.00024409538,0.7578097,0.00019172482,0.0007645369,0.2203487,0.0020928322,0.017375544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027005939,0.00005080021,0.00046878072,0.0021401967,0.00001631394,0.00032444624,0.76878065,0.00078481215,0.0027113722,0.12315222,0.101512164,0.000031227006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044235266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004402574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1032258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01076599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008720543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5459167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408101566","doi":"10.1108/qrom-02-2024-2687","title":"The unanticipated performativity of an observation grid through the evolution of its forms of agency","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Repertory grid; Grid; Epistemology; Gender studies; Social science; Geography; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Geodesy","score_opus":0.15142417339360087,"score_gpt":0.5446034339174516,"score_spread":0.3931792605238507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408101566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65503675,0.00066809147,0.20431724,0.0073631634,0.00014488201,0.00040215446,0.000096044874,0.00038744515,0.13158426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98670304,0.00006980787,0.010870326,0.00008173783,0.00000902492,0.00012360362,0.000014133858,0.000054274427,0.0020739972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.915932,0.06910244,0.0015880961,0.0056252126,0.0056151547,0.0021370403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90728897,0.051159896,0.0067055007,0.02744602,0.0050627124,0.0023367978],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05779974,0.00042961742,0.0004590792,0.0024597417,0.0089971805,0.012517595,0.00188485,0.0013933297,0.0028656009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058954775,0.0007230303,0.00055616436,0.0019320144,0.067422405,0.009657535,0.012552449,0.0024847314,0.0003436651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307906,0.000047147296,0.012024726,0.00017255751,0.000031969466,0.00045318805,0.601554,0.0010372808,0.0028900139,0.34991196,0.00063195406,0.0311144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081821294,0.00038616115,0.021401498,0.0006732218,0.000091648435,0.0011350086,0.528768,0.005822152,0.0071993195,0.23358849,0.20066662,0.00018606402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060241926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005735479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007883596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008619218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3056779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408815227","doi":"10.1108/qrom-02-2024-2681","title":"Composing with the <i>terra fluida</i> of interaction: new paths for CCO research as relational practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21188985804452923,"score_gpt":0.6164818317420211,"score_spread":0.4045919736974919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408815227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13541062,0.02452825,0.33533183,0.15177907,0.001832538,0.00080268696,0.00022065308,0.0004506644,0.3496437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549096,0.0037722979,0.032918375,0.002352985,0.0002489452,0.0005081764,0.00005432158,0.0001580246,0.0050772037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647597,0.028437428,0.0009184188,0.0024991632,0.0021234036,0.0012617894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393164,0.043276243,0.0031872063,0.009432679,0.0023521772,0.0024354008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032469288,0.00082334614,0.0011216277,0.0048944247,0.016445784,0.030506749,0.002857519,0.005154928,0.006943493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034309506,0.000709161,0.0010063363,0.0047929487,0.16753295,0.047528602,0.020614129,0.008138758,0.00075604115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016292533,0.000013113197,0.00061254116,0.00013277183,0.0000051288544,0.00013337923,0.12624131,0.00010234423,0.00013648858,0.8631164,0.0006474273,0.008842905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012445476,0.000036496043,0.0006256714,0.0012692981,0.000015333431,0.00036306347,0.2029998,0.00081765006,0.00034256675,0.69485915,0.09861747,0.000040944753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007045267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00525835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032469288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010363319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016077677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17171603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416384877","doi":"10.1108/qrom-07-2024-2789","title":"Queering ways of doing research in MOS with a queer ethos and writing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Queer; Ethos; Queer theory; Scholarship; Power (physics); Homosexuality; Humanism","score_opus":0.1405105379193919,"score_gpt":0.46487217302513073,"score_spread":0.32436163510573884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416384877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031321775,0.03231933,0.07423379,0.6433499,0.012961529,0.00030738988,0.00012265584,0.00046693409,0.20491675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76826626,0.02782965,0.048742235,0.07237892,0.009923082,0.0009993697,0.0001161082,0.00092367193,0.07082074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9018812,0.08762665,0.001725601,0.0025795451,0.0045685824,0.0016184894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8191726,0.14926602,0.008277405,0.011349616,0.006014878,0.005919497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06441045,0.0007213077,0.00090381486,0.0026618482,0.019511515,0.0288132,0.0023528868,0.0047743632,0.007935332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08041209,0.0005049639,0.0006029753,0.0022545627,0.11372643,0.028312061,0.011609935,0.014635077,0.0016606197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002388319,0.000039501112,0.0005314617,0.00025994692,0.00001420954,0.00031628928,0.34054542,0.00015121384,0.00026380413,0.60410345,0.029248102,0.024502672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016466243,0.000043902823,0.00036920223,0.0011257702,0.00001132828,0.0005773686,0.15195261,0.00035575245,0.00044051773,0.27181005,0.5732456,0.0000514562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019899039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041741314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061198305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009132629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34063905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}