{"meta":{"query_hash":"299f7600f068","filters":{"venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/299f7600f068","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Qualitative+and+Quantitative+Methods+in+Libraries"},"results":[{"id":"W2171209354","doi":"10.1142/9789814299701_0003","title":"Bibliometric Analyses on Repository Contents for the Evaluation of Research at Wageningen UR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.7405257126400728,"score_gpt":0.6522087381971826,"score_spread":0.08831697444289022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171209354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39672166,0.02698566,0.059949484,0.0025500155,0.0010347739,0.00678991,0.2087047,0.008220831,0.289043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63954026,0.01665829,0.09130524,0.00024472058,0.00096708594,0.010917192,0.1938728,0.0029898847,0.043504465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8993517,0.018703563,0.016190939,0.0047547547,0.059150383,0.00184867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8898968,0.037590373,0.02036433,0.0148975225,0.035270665,0.0019802896],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037766267,0.0012034556,0.0028831982,0.14985348,0.002009054,0.011279041,0.0023941647,0.0009622579,0.020155601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12609136,0.00071447046,0.0022537431,0.19628564,0.0014598727,0.006171419,0.006625306,0.0008512606,0.008022169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009106678,0.0004414641,0.08458102,0.010792436,0.0013659868,0.0005243561,0.010278782,0.0039123213,0.0049782507,0.02711816,0.05937171,0.79572487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020879216,0.0007977318,0.5560716,0.005282631,0.0020088102,0.0009960984,0.012093256,0.00857717,0.013430785,0.017840743,0.38221008,0.00048235146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004072388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033681344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85014653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00461166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007320914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1997295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768710815","doi":"","title":"Framework for development of Information Technology Infrastructure for Health (ITIH) care in India – a critical study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Business; Interoperability; Health informatics; Stakeholder; Government (linguistics); Population; Information infrastructure; Knowledge management; Information system; HRHIS; Medicine; Public relations; Health policy; Computer science; Political science; Environmental health; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.38286685303719686,"score_gpt":0.6728693411259936,"score_spread":0.29000248808879675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768710815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04644865,0.018727021,0.1579976,0.17205784,0.0011620645,0.004961765,0.0017236347,0.000711565,0.59620994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62100196,0.017409595,0.29595223,0.009445057,0.00035838303,0.0028494038,0.0017266446,0.00015319689,0.05110353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294007,0.0033032645,0.0007151752,0.0005173747,0.0013147193,0.0012093732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373156,0.0022007746,0.0005038724,0.00035816777,0.0021662936,0.001039387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009179154,0.0006701263,0.00035393424,0.0062251114,0.00432645,0.013926043,0.0022018817,0.0031461453,0.005143245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045832894,0.00045707318,0.00092490844,0.0053277058,0.0077590267,0.0066065276,0.0056869127,0.0029172504,0.00096024625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008922301,0.00006359462,0.0014594061,0.00054621155,0.000007462886,0.0007966644,0.0054934225,0.0012220704,0.0003079198,0.9542872,0.011240813,0.024566334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022204935,0.00015779368,0.009415501,0.0045531495,0.000048563863,0.002008074,0.047062196,0.006581135,0.0011089679,0.26478237,0.66416115,0.00009882653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038021006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0250817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038021006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02134111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050552163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891358922","doi":"","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature on Open Access in Scopus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Subject (documents); Library science; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; English language; Political science; MEDLINE; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.8790385872218804,"score_gpt":0.7668242092888382,"score_spread":0.11221437793304223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891358922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79912305,0.032007374,0.012740303,0.002077478,0.00037687158,0.0020969142,0.058621634,0.00089190144,0.09206458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295604,0.018148586,0.018013373,0.00013130295,0.0005544502,0.0016733976,0.02754679,0.00014971576,0.004221945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727563,0.003940998,0.0046107667,0.0011696949,0.016710483,0.0008116841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9148934,0.050112225,0.014821674,0.00222604,0.016561909,0.0013848606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012927042,0.00091353286,0.002538177,0.29230022,0.0022845285,0.007032896,0.0012656883,0.00068484654,0.005694481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0822929,0.0003665043,0.0023565937,0.33699542,0.0012488508,0.0056879423,0.0033928698,0.0005319012,0.001422319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061406486,0.00053361617,0.3936002,0.019480225,0.0029487147,0.0014167666,0.010221096,0.0042568957,0.0033771317,0.016650578,0.024257593,0.5226431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113772905,0.0007494025,0.8764651,0.004098099,0.0020927098,0.002408343,0.023192648,0.012021491,0.0028503076,0.010128678,0.06561618,0.00026318146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072955186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036993502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068365514},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2935764204","doi":"","title":"A Liaison Model Approach to Research Skills Instruction In Light of the New ACRL Information Literacy Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Presentation (obstetrics); Computer science; Critical thinking; Literacy; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Library science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1353391714328554,"score_gpt":0.5236505914861127,"score_spread":0.3883114200532573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935764204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031509645,0.00047328044,0.73045164,0.015508305,0.00020738297,0.0007098401,0.000082675775,0.0008030861,0.22025424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50363857,0.0006861296,0.44476917,0.0020578965,0.00010623326,0.002104772,0.00011115009,0.00011746821,0.04640875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956156,0.0030543678,0.00012502102,0.000343309,0.0006548072,0.0002069752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633634,0.0022113875,0.00024539232,0.00027470657,0.0005506861,0.00038153603],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045006843,0.00051158114,0.00036204036,0.0016461264,0.0016137756,0.0050000376,0.002423648,0.0018237637,0.009163117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058737993,0.0003425407,0.0005695066,0.000847922,0.003479123,0.004524128,0.0034160793,0.0025191803,0.0015036071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678348,0.0006857652,0.0022129603,0.00030240702,0.000018476738,0.0003864954,0.0166371,0.0064599724,0.0016118203,0.87891495,0.0056721307,0.087030105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015964468,0.0007734809,0.0032056286,0.00080451847,0.000059814425,0.0008543889,0.016978934,0.09331256,0.0031039778,0.69313604,0.18751675,0.000094276445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047562425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009743022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99499995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051911436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008791628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037664592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951354326","doi":"","title":"Facilitating Learning and Research Engagement of 4th year Undergraduate Students: the Outcomes of Student Self-Assessment Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Likert scale; Medical education; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Student engagement; Class (philosophy); Information literacy; Scale (ratio); Conceptual framework; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3795465078128826,"score_gpt":0.6369396144877767,"score_spread":0.25739310667489407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951354326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865365,0.00003079346,0.00018629513,0.00008776768,0.0000060272414,0.000099569406,0.00013397787,0.000017163955,0.0007847874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970753,0.00008177668,0.00080922723,0.00006923902,0.000010906718,0.00026956532,0.0003383831,0.000008828193,0.001336757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945984,0.0023044029,0.0006498144,0.0004089101,0.0011895775,0.00084884354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713496,0.0073883478,0.0065080174,0.0015325218,0.007667851,0.0055537014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011649968,0.0003832043,0.00074796274,0.002611752,0.00087015633,0.002162926,0.00087755854,0.001118599,0.0014373357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030150857,0.00037056883,0.0010132254,0.001125876,0.0006396722,0.0013914403,0.0032815277,0.0013128933,0.0007673505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033346657,0.0034378709,0.9202459,0.00010575198,0.000107398584,0.00016638868,0.021527719,0.00025553873,0.0013603567,0.000105860454,0.0010545182,0.051299304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033871627,0.0020462517,0.9800204,0.000035436275,0.00003156972,0.000103072314,0.013324576,0.00071512186,0.0012790012,0.00011566902,0.0022407528,0.000054353794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015163255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002362852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011649968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009707914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011724193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061611652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208769526","doi":"","title":"Virtual(ly) Overnight: Providing Resources and Services in the era of COVID-19","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Closure (psychology); Pandemic; Service (business); Resource (disambiguation); Service delivery framework; World Wide Web; Business; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Marketing","score_opus":0.21939453607920265,"score_gpt":0.4950901167326157,"score_spread":0.27569558065341304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208769526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7633454,0.0017407608,0.004648144,0.044198655,0.00045959852,0.0003307833,0.00029514494,0.00020047721,0.18478097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97967577,0.0005563732,0.0014308047,0.0019789122,0.00003103997,0.00009192078,0.000050205086,0.00006616273,0.016118852],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877193,0.008208229,0.00023392457,0.0003414822,0.0013043409,0.0021927208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105,0.0027150828,0.00084262213,0.0006521272,0.001203233,0.0035369524],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007971368,0.00024348323,0.00033451512,0.00094742497,0.026897836,0.013082385,0.0021692778,0.0017290819,0.011776516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013799057,0.00043342754,0.00026553796,0.001867839,0.0194939,0.009564457,0.017358145,0.0027417955,0.0011075526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009430066,0.00008995281,0.01076455,0.0002271555,0.000007460796,0.0014963931,0.8868907,0.00010761722,0.0004949325,0.041801706,0.024958856,0.033066303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042113807,0.000036976817,0.0042535225,0.00017680805,0.00000402615,0.00017877197,0.8893963,0.00006108051,0.0001272232,0.0012119462,0.10453025,0.000018865676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26743078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4548271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036053944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03730599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5317483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}