{"meta":{"query_hash":"d24ffb9e6b4e","filters":{"venue":"Quality Assurance in Education"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d24ffb9e6b4e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quality+Assurance+in+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W1567159340","doi":"10.1108/qae-09-2014-0046","title":"Self-regulation with rules","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Benchmarking; Pooling; Jurisdiction; Accountability; Computer science; Accreditation; Quality assurance; Scope (computer science); Standardization; Work (physics); Autonomy; Process management; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.25316117946801747,"score_gpt":0.538446493773278,"score_spread":0.28528531430526055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567159340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576592,0.00011039744,0.0024349005,0.0052888193,0.000704992,0.0002679763,0.000002749087,0.000046488418,0.033484485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98522025,0.000009339842,0.012972716,0.00034128653,0.00012758195,0.000061959254,0.000022583861,0.0000056546974,0.0012386519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968841,0.00053571264,0.0005927792,0.00029979728,0.0015426268,0.00014495726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786615,0.0004686976,0.00030726613,0.00044843575,0.00081396213,0.00009548487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007451222,0.000094182295,0.00016689092,0.00020898732,0.00005801887,0.00016160459,0.0002532826,0.000052575935,0.00019831645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011156158,0.00006935918,0.000024242996,0.00073709927,0.000035592977,0.000923433,0.00001480214,0.00009123591,0.0005936531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076839686,0.0005287572,0.847904,0.000018187671,0.000006595525,1.6631668e-7,0.0077952933,0.0028425853,0.000041935255,0.02395643,0.0069401893,0.10988898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045235548,0.000049860857,0.89466023,0.000024913375,0.0000033330616,0.0000021700355,0.005352902,0.0037086664,0.0001111192,0.04041516,0.055079922,0.00013933641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017893386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008908564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109749645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022234538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016435597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7630408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022171531","doi":"10.1108/09684880210446866","title":"Assuring quality service in higher education: registration and advising attitudes in a private university in Lebanon","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Higher education; Service (business); Quality (philosophy); Competition (biology); Service quality; Public relations; Medical education; Marketing; Academic advising; Business; Management; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.06982134969988885,"score_gpt":0.31073603919187387,"score_spread":0.24091468949198502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022171531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777012,0.00034595808,0.000006948406,0.012700435,0.00048978406,0.00039149565,0.0000016038413,0.000041055395,0.008321535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971892,0.00006235769,0.00020964985,0.0017291025,0.00026864588,0.000022711385,0.00003980793,0.000013579806,0.00046489466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786454,0.0002832093,0.000756633,0.0005193465,0.00027154485,0.00030472197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989354,0.00018270746,0.00039544931,0.00034159303,0.00012399259,0.000020836258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021433542,0.00020141088,0.00032840378,0.00062727317,0.0000840275,0.0001665767,0.00022823922,0.00015952271,0.00013735465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015342083,0.00025927986,0.000030276877,0.0020301647,0.000040965304,0.002466817,0.00006563003,0.00034630953,0.000035141507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055844506,0.0011328299,0.9566253,0.0013454418,0.0000030253047,0.0000019149536,0.0014156937,0.00032968872,0.00013090084,0.030347394,0.00008162617,0.008530342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006910371,0.000003205192,0.9839839,0.0006151023,0.000004824281,5.3322657e-7,0.0025402538,0.0003174784,0.000006259942,0.0019268204,0.009606356,0.00030428174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065981835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16580401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09982218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042415212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001309436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047008782","doi":"10.1108/09684880010356057","title":"The concept of programme specification and its application in the new quality assurance framework","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Organizational Change and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Process (computing); Higher education; Product (mathematics); Process management; Engineering management; Program assurance; Accounting; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06650689388332034,"score_gpt":0.33326870174662065,"score_spread":0.2667618078633003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047008782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363645,0.002436449,0.00077681476,0.056936536,0.000303113,0.001170646,0.0000037373609,0.000037570266,0.00197064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966104,0.00014556045,0.00016226506,0.0011463497,0.0015816486,0.00010888385,0.00005682448,0.000010706245,0.00017733577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985676,0.0001593104,0.00051985646,0.00024885038,0.00031229356,0.00019212613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985232,0.000670616,0.00033129044,0.00030769582,0.00015677924,0.000010470987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018441684,0.00011442088,0.00014944236,0.000062863655,0.00012923988,0.00013899943,0.0002911139,0.00008969814,0.00003756943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008333125,0.00008712967,0.000026731477,0.0010143057,0.00007232255,0.0005809262,0.000010249516,0.00019151269,0.000043811116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011341928,0.00063828897,0.22296418,0.00038533614,0.000010386041,1.3808553e-7,0.008730171,0.00014987928,0.0002835837,0.4301939,0.002757353,0.33377334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021869189,0.00000467261,0.9069507,0.00008763559,0.0000065718664,3.9195027e-7,0.0055846395,0.00012232005,0.0001013117,0.035397694,0.051380355,0.00014500061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017494584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021413073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68398654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043977896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35530448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614263794","doi":"10.1108/qae-11-2016-0061","title":"Aligning accreditation and academic program reviews: a Canadian case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Originality; Process (computing); Quality assurance; Medical education; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.3785250918363774,"score_gpt":0.6180966053799812,"score_spread":0.23957151354360384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614263794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97497153,0.000617994,0.0000069348894,0.018148758,0.0007990519,0.0014809074,0.000001516531,0.000032846692,0.003940478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690473,0.00033842077,0.0016974377,0.00017008591,0.0003085424,0.0003516316,0.000004287705,0.000005672024,0.00021917772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968755,0.002020744,0.0003687487,0.00024897064,0.00028528663,0.00020072488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843466,0.00042522664,0.0005548231,0.00030483012,0.00013791522,0.00014253712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013526356,0.000078400066,0.00014554219,0.00011635704,0.0015071137,0.00036150377,0.00024065342,0.00009175646,0.000017727392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015323284,0.00008738572,0.000017149065,0.00011677717,0.00012082794,0.0016591663,0.000016095808,0.0002777099,0.000017333326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021500996,0.00014454647,0.56227154,0.000024557989,0.0000036515542,0.0000051692664,0.09949292,0.000001814369,0.0000045253564,0.0012463164,0.00066520483,0.3361376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019139494,0.00003395713,0.781541,0.0001228139,0.000018773622,0.000010363611,0.15140148,0.000030001107,0.0000014179574,0.0010914764,0.06541233,0.00014501359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8450977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91856915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33599257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016774101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782069798","doi":"10.1108/qae-10-2017-0068","title":"Towards a more meaningful involvement of librarians in academic program reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Process (computing); Perception; Best practice; Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Empirical research; Medical education; Psychology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Management; Medicine","score_opus":0.09567384585529323,"score_gpt":0.4566494543530439,"score_spread":0.3609756084977507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782069798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95060664,0.0006140019,0.000053821852,0.015041241,0.00084679347,0.00112423,0.00000411354,0.00004626049,0.031662907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898048,0.000842282,0.0051397346,0.003113142,0.00035744358,0.00020524724,0.000021663303,0.00000418564,0.0005115112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980177,0.0004304447,0.00079283013,0.0001683514,0.0003602316,0.00023039225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992189,0.00007243864,0.0003467312,0.00019180091,0.00010434884,0.00006581994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032113688,0.000076739,0.00018751687,0.0001740416,0.00008728379,0.000057923284,0.00037637044,0.000094124705,0.00014547071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008575684,0.00007266677,0.000037960275,0.001303809,0.00029437908,0.006522015,0.000023672754,0.0001542202,0.00003716534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151110335,0.00034336213,0.24194467,0.00014132563,0.0000016938743,5.5135022e-8,0.30241454,0.000004429,0.00006120453,0.06703118,0.0045497236,0.3834927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016511812,0.00005625337,0.40383956,0.00040559485,0.0000014480582,1.0162303e-7,0.032832995,0.00008022776,0.00027899104,0.0065722703,0.55561894,0.00014849631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003299167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006808207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5510692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011009259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012023817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49873754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175865406","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2020-0097","title":"Congruity and contradiction: student and institutional perspectives of learning and quality in higher education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Transformative learning; Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Leverage (statistics); Contradiction; Rubric; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Pedagogy; Sociology; Public relations; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.23574825597133603,"score_gpt":0.5754441794370239,"score_spread":0.33969592346568783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175865406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703182,0.013283581,0.000017067776,0.011029765,0.0011249986,0.0003270457,0.000008507201,0.000013877313,0.0038769825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481547,0.0026690415,0.00033495727,0.00018527114,0.00018565962,0.0001541361,0.000028139972,0.0000055566334,0.0016217553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757856,0.00116067,0.0006081803,0.0003237195,0.00016713479,0.00016174391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998546,0.00061366026,0.00025202945,0.00012353237,0.00037939107,0.000085412306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012578627,0.000101885395,0.0002628428,0.00011144773,0.00028701988,0.00001783499,0.000036580182,0.00012778059,0.00015116562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065026374,0.000112516456,0.000017705672,0.00024721393,0.00018132974,0.00027586275,0.000035211022,0.00040707592,0.0000016924271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019638359,0.0006261423,0.7994951,0.00037156662,0.000008228714,8.58714e-8,0.02465797,0.000007651996,0.00018991083,0.16948897,0.000054110315,0.005080638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004464867,0.000013320118,0.8353549,0.0002616435,0.00000544331,0.0000011584206,0.15545951,0.000008022228,0.000004582174,0.0017236162,0.0066292277,0.00009207984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029706124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048248973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16776535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030032752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019819161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45882878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200242489","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2021-0135","title":"The quality continuum: perceptions of institutional accreditation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Public relations; Bureaucracy; Higher education; Originality; Political science; Sociology; Focus group; Value (mathematics); Accountability; Qualitative research; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.04000685562762878,"score_gpt":0.4294286142086568,"score_spread":0.389421758581028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200242489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581946,0.00049450493,0.0004186673,0.017410561,0.0025306994,0.00017477613,0.000011545067,0.000017144173,0.020747479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931987,0.0006024944,0.0015507182,0.00027477895,0.00029603083,0.00009131323,0.000046841003,0.0000030760164,0.003936052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978319,0.0007747159,0.0005374423,0.00017572966,0.0005164013,0.00016384044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980312,0.00073156424,0.0002689324,0.00020408983,0.00071501685,0.000049212973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002465745,0.00006194675,0.000121930934,0.000034835357,0.0005185999,0.000065580934,0.00015299255,0.00006674505,0.00015801137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024536226,0.000059153434,0.000048758528,0.00055697694,0.0002577212,0.0003348339,0.000011863306,0.000103562386,0.00003299457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017396,0.00060629303,0.47618598,0.000041198105,0.0000120950635,1.750642e-7,0.05085317,0.000028580966,0.00085107505,0.39193103,0.010858897,0.068614095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009751411,0.0000020157743,0.83855826,0.00003397905,0.0000018448507,2.1561995e-7,0.027234502,5.3122955e-7,0.00016096077,0.007212214,0.12662889,0.00006906851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039837053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034839142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034376277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063150935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280541748","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2021-0122","title":"Higher education and the principles of access, quality and accountability: Brazil × Canada panorama","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Education and Public Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Higher education; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Originality; Government (linguistics); Quality management system; Democracy; Qualitative research; Political science; Marketing; Business; Economic growth; Quality management; Economics; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.09343709663231384,"score_gpt":0.4496629888437123,"score_spread":0.35622589221139844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280541748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88152766,0.0009868693,9.708405e-7,0.09462682,0.001430652,0.00048051352,0.000024624214,0.000011836052,0.020910049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919329,0.00016274324,0.000043513326,0.003901097,0.00021878336,0.00041460834,0.000023135926,0.0000052973905,0.003297871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965049,0.0020797714,0.00049907964,0.00024580525,0.0004865812,0.0001838387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979425,0.0010920306,0.00039209385,0.0002950849,0.00019405434,0.00008425583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048485612,0.00008754799,0.00019954248,0.000070025366,0.00053506054,0.00012819492,0.00032661657,0.00004234531,0.00037514535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011982577,0.000080733254,0.000023063338,0.00057227287,0.00042172117,0.00040680423,0.000085900094,0.00018449903,4.078793e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003147679,0.0003141224,0.5039642,0.000078276345,0.000006072653,8.321222e-9,0.01795947,0.0000067219453,0.0000058704168,0.45038024,0.0035972132,0.02365636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016574045,0.0000024964545,0.6736046,0.000007635146,0.0000034050202,2.2801032e-7,0.025121575,0.0000015726997,0.0000032620105,0.010126056,0.2908902,0.000073206196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95462453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82571906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44025418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005259931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011576136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282838049","doi":"10.1108/qae-01-2022-0023","title":"Forming an academic program review learning community: description of a conceptual model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual model; Originality; Conceptual framework; Coaching; Knowledge management; Higher education; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.4163696404446108,"score_gpt":0.5642644332565905,"score_spread":0.1478947928119797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282838049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98706985,0.0027047757,0.00028377512,0.0057426337,0.0002756032,0.0007611194,0.0000030543688,0.000087799526,0.0030714022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940837,0.0012404687,0.003200105,0.0005309748,0.000050255272,0.00043160658,0.000059257516,0.000007991226,0.0003956387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98805094,0.0103927795,0.0005412229,0.00014861544,0.0006947838,0.00017166129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982297,0.0006423192,0.0006910732,0.00020934126,0.00018010323,0.000047469046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021808745,0.00007038508,0.00018353261,0.00008956033,0.00097106834,0.00002304014,0.00037551348,0.000054937904,0.00008051847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057243495,0.00008875403,0.00003870061,0.00045226797,0.00019820404,0.0013525395,0.000048344038,0.0012108993,0.0000025567265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043063086,0.0016897393,0.07723954,0.00066998234,0.000010588184,6.337436e-8,0.48428252,0.016253164,0.00060440594,0.04660903,0.0008227466,0.37177515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004334611,0.00033770304,0.03930562,0.0013062829,0.00006004911,0.0000018784331,0.8193982,0.011242602,0.00003030405,0.016061775,0.111361615,0.0004604719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01201553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025970207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37131467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004311332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011718025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284711440","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2022-0048","title":"Assuring online assessment quality: the case of unproctored online assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Originality; Psychology; Alternative assessment; Online assessment; Higher education; Medical education; Mathematics education; Marketing; Social psychology; Political science; Formative assessment; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.08445615915997876,"score_gpt":0.4978529657096593,"score_spread":0.4133968065496806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284711440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787797,0.00022359876,0.00016156999,0.012366142,0.0018393524,0.00084314,0.00014808531,0.000052647505,0.005585767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400616,0.00011495878,0.0036403213,0.00041731456,0.00042030963,0.00026099756,0.00019810296,0.000017769024,0.00092404976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935477,0.0033745212,0.0010700691,0.0004374459,0.0011562317,0.00041404046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970511,0.0013005661,0.00076250476,0.000529255,0.00026899655,0.00008755889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077026314,0.00019205212,0.00040471734,0.00016325021,0.00096625456,0.00009397459,0.00063926505,0.000074376876,0.0004052298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039865557,0.00018156147,0.00013830389,0.0011210537,0.00021923942,0.00033030933,0.00018006965,0.0006019047,0.0000015652599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155827,0.008963269,0.7506404,0.00018673194,0.00011208248,0.00002203057,0.06700507,0.001234673,0.0007957598,0.10905865,0.0015788825,0.060340885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045490204,0.000052391668,0.64012235,0.00003221283,0.00002364593,0.0000049062655,0.3466822,0.00023559251,0.000009275086,0.0017356784,0.010414537,0.00023233019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037396092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046258204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27967712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012230405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024530513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313320968","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2022-0030","title":"Institutional change through departmental quality assurance self-studies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Mandate; Quality (philosophy); Originality; Business; Public relations; Process management; Political science; Marketing; Sociology; Qualitative research; Service (business)","score_opus":0.2220539880728463,"score_gpt":0.49132053532574677,"score_spread":0.26926654725290045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313320968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361593,0.004122576,0.00006317844,0.032450084,0.0078055453,0.0008719027,0.00006463702,0.00015268794,0.01831007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904307,0.0016275463,0.0020056828,0.0023086974,0.00071758125,0.0019332742,0.00008273859,0.000010125443,0.0008836281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952977,0.0024845675,0.0005716368,0.00041169606,0.00087540515,0.00035902276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984381,0.00069811573,0.00033670227,0.00027783136,0.00017386998,0.00007537233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043926113,0.00014715371,0.00024383976,0.00008134642,0.0018598441,0.00006591668,0.0002998243,0.000053249143,0.0005148417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077325315,0.00017468883,0.00007694726,0.0007540182,0.00018038916,0.0011313925,0.000074858544,0.00032705412,0.0000456628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000598405,0.0036707774,0.29050764,0.00021933703,0.0000991874,0.000002191551,0.32262674,0.0002817504,0.000045171273,0.3338395,0.026321346,0.022326503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021391008,0.000017479393,0.28612712,0.000021055817,0.000008122941,0.0000011007394,0.12009595,0.0000023649043,0.00001155507,0.004416396,0.58887774,0.000207196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01464866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008685147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5625564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019857439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016210511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714453","doi":"10.1108/qae-11-2023-0194","title":"Managing quality assurance at community colleges in Ontario, Canada: experiences and perspectives of front-line quality managers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Quality policy; Thematic analysis; Originality; Accountability; Public relations; Quality management; Higher education; Qualitative research; Reflexivity; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.04814606394993914,"score_gpt":0.37362328880261153,"score_spread":0.3254772248526724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97470665,0.0031577032,0.00003916067,0.011066565,0.0013534687,0.00037887503,0.000019459434,0.00003096636,0.00924713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935007,0.0005869597,0.00053365453,0.00022840164,0.00006530832,0.00018012432,0.000016879603,0.000008919238,0.004879068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568284,0.0019576342,0.0008826329,0.0004229686,0.0007112624,0.0003426373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765944,0.0014149635,0.0003126027,0.00033129333,0.00017735013,0.000104350795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050663888,0.00018157679,0.0004161143,0.00014200369,0.00039631853,0.00008932061,0.0003098988,0.00009817841,0.0002516614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007949584,0.00020044034,0.00004653696,0.00060878875,0.00037591645,0.0005566512,0.000052760075,0.00039448685,0.000003608641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036874706,0.0002594838,0.45242795,0.00025102767,0.000015254568,9.417182e-7,0.5326689,0.000036390953,0.00003420784,0.009038142,0.0017591285,0.0034717333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011119766,0.0000061879236,0.6264973,0.00020340615,0.0000024775431,2.0535798e-7,0.36148855,0.0000033493525,0.000054457312,0.0013509087,0.010116055,0.00016587082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17406939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044775903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413941366","doi":"10.1108/qae-04-2025-0086","title":"Making curriculum review accountable – an impact study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Higher education; Business; Economics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.11687886737822746,"score_gpt":0.5930719048477306,"score_spread":0.4761930374695032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413941366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540727,0.0050766566,0.000024353354,0.011569685,0.0018494022,0.0009385531,0.000001287541,0.000081520404,0.026385836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514556,0.0008848552,0.00033985838,0.0011203858,0.00020576951,0.00021170118,0.000009930535,0.000007011791,0.002074899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995816,0.0027512957,0.00044932746,0.00033273548,0.0003874185,0.00026321213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844366,0.00045077372,0.0003240593,0.00040619582,0.00031665017,0.000058651105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063092783,0.00011065038,0.00022920273,0.00012143001,0.00036768074,0.00020571858,0.0003711218,0.000064206644,0.0004616317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033507925,0.000114812465,0.000044122644,0.0015210231,0.00005992081,0.0014993068,0.000016917917,0.0002556559,0.00007701273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004389299,0.0018480467,0.9438994,0.00017732116,0.000010276884,1.2502764e-7,0.025616817,0.000025058087,0.0000039625047,0.0031051824,0.006318638,0.018990796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008635432,0.000019391335,0.75502616,0.0007480847,0.000019566558,1.489901e-7,0.06288372,0.000003461312,7.755142e-7,0.000530229,0.1805506,0.00013151029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040523402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0159788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18887323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062762754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029176932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96586585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414843603","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2025-0061","title":"International research on accreditation as a strategy for educational quality: identification of patterns in scientific collaboration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Educational Innovations and Challenges","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Internationalization; Identification (biology); Scopus; Higher education; Sample (material); Collaborative network","score_opus":0.18706357323726788,"score_gpt":0.5434066252512906,"score_spread":0.3563430520140227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414843603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92032266,0.00018179862,0.01118524,0.059826683,0.003686114,0.0009272115,0.000059712474,0.000022990353,0.0037875904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945199,0.00006506586,0.0022156606,0.00015382328,0.00014408637,0.001092325,0.00041948687,0.0000072353437,0.0013824443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965115,0.00055345614,0.0012733035,0.0006677939,0.0007519448,0.00024195472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426186,0.0018361992,0.0004599393,0.00063079834,0.0027763327,0.000034842487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061291275,0.00013342767,0.0001997235,0.0018540482,0.00018899675,0.00040142742,0.00080159464,0.00012588961,0.000021240674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014288535,0.00015813056,0.000047138277,0.003288661,0.00010821179,0.0011303248,0.00004740712,0.00022456454,0.000014124869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044102948,0.0015795868,0.010954511,0.00017818432,0.000010595315,3.7375322e-8,0.001978913,0.0011027795,0.0032739355,0.9452753,0.0012360634,0.034365986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047191174,0.000051455718,0.7788424,0.00028215942,0.0000019480474,3.3102984e-7,0.011706922,0.0014754172,0.0035975836,0.20116557,0.0022391896,0.00016510053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045670665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013354158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065268617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004098077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7269813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}