{"meta":{"query_hash":"d24ffb9e6b4e","filters":{"venue":"Quality Assurance in Education"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d24ffb9e6b4e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quality+Assurance+in+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W1567159340","doi":"10.1108/qae-09-2014-0046","title":"Self-regulation with rules","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Benchmarking; Pooling; Jurisdiction; Accountability; Computer science; Accreditation; Quality assurance; Scope (computer science); Standardization; Work (physics); Autonomy; Process management; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.25316117946801747,"score_gpt":0.538446493773278,"score_spread":0.28528531430526055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567159340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01944935,0.0019054946,0.28344762,0.016453704,0.00071924715,0.0003211912,0.0002548821,0.00047232653,0.67697614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84029895,0.0013822526,0.07079425,0.0051555606,0.0005634281,0.0008001264,0.00033833244,0.00041457408,0.0802526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834831,0.005989563,0.0010274044,0.0047168094,0.0034784912,0.0013047167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748862,0.01071706,0.001938076,0.00770472,0.003971703,0.0007822772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016237516,0.00064753153,0.0010624308,0.0015338893,0.0039920905,0.010104256,0.0028651634,0.0039001023,0.013667901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02578118,0.0006191959,0.0019926983,0.0013657211,0.029964034,0.008471791,0.005486586,0.0049097855,0.0023417617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041186827,0.00000653362,0.00024181753,0.000021329424,0.000008362519,0.000031032327,0.0005910929,0.00061744376,0.00006561998,0.9939413,0.0011381998,0.0033331534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015000611,0.000008213067,0.00021552577,0.00007182804,0.000009707353,0.00004925571,0.0002501125,0.001942844,0.00016765372,0.95349663,0.043757744,0.00001547349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01436962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006718721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016237516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069362465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076078344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08587319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022171531","doi":"10.1108/09684880210446866","title":"Assuring quality service in higher education: registration and advising attitudes in a private university in Lebanon","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Higher education; Service (business); Quality (philosophy); Competition (biology); Service quality; Public relations; Medical education; Marketing; Academic advising; Business; Management; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.06982134969988885,"score_gpt":0.31073603919187387,"score_spread":0.24091468949198502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022171531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999419,0.000020322517,0.000018774494,0.00021143153,0.0000040183613,0.000004370568,0.0000052365044,8.792428e-7,0.00031596748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980691,0.000056202713,0.00003960824,0.00018179783,0.000009601571,0.0000051494862,0.000009914996,0.0000015442581,0.001627066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998847,0.0004180674,0.000039162584,0.00008417505,0.00017026822,0.0004412409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969999,0.00054395734,0.000565563,0.0000647693,0.00036548884,0.0014602401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021729583,0.00033147956,0.00028482437,0.00083119463,0.0067702415,0.0025690016,0.00068146037,0.0009786553,0.0039382027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001921795,0.0003269322,0.00023454428,0.00069675635,0.0017243376,0.001451538,0.0016404962,0.0011147255,0.00057676126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004592207,0.0040103,0.7071075,0.000061891646,0.00003225669,0.0039006372,0.25111437,0.00024186735,0.004994394,0.001275714,0.001561074,0.025240803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026554128,0.0016921922,0.43899453,0.000054270942,0.000018114593,0.00052243023,0.55313385,0.0008499878,0.00063916703,0.00019770244,0.003830057,0.000041068182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05554363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11450646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05554363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00374417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033195696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11044067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047008782","doi":"10.1108/09684880010356057","title":"The concept of programme specification and its application in the new quality assurance framework","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Organizational Change and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Process (computing); Higher education; Product (mathematics); Process management; Engineering management; Program assurance; Accounting; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Operations management; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06650689388332034,"score_gpt":0.33326870174662065,"score_spread":0.2667618078633003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047008782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047488334,0.0022808523,0.8727457,0.021456445,0.0011999038,0.00064720365,0.00014427326,0.00049197255,0.096284874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2882898,0.0030431214,0.67012596,0.007199624,0.0018130094,0.00374436,0.00036063234,0.00048293182,0.024940616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9238891,0.0474507,0.0048745833,0.0037434688,0.017513711,0.0025283794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157158,0.055679116,0.007310573,0.008415727,0.01058388,0.0022948282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048695344,0.0008561197,0.0009012823,0.005188108,0.004401352,0.00995178,0.0033894612,0.007157155,0.004927011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07812953,0.0009329066,0.0017655873,0.0053595025,0.032831308,0.015394325,0.0066803033,0.009766918,0.00133396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007894225,0.000013018863,0.00014956901,0.000068674206,0.0000039242072,0.000041591324,0.0010033821,0.0007198801,0.0000801294,0.9824996,0.0015457902,0.013866541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002721126,0.00009849811,0.0005384121,0.00043107424,0.0000139859585,0.00024046657,0.000758681,0.0034887192,0.0005464824,0.8560335,0.13775252,0.00007057915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007987322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039057415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048695344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008670378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014649075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25752866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614263794","doi":"10.1108/qae-11-2016-0061","title":"Aligning accreditation and academic program reviews: a Canadian case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Originality; Process (computing); Quality assurance; Medical education; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.3785250918363774,"score_gpt":0.6180966053799812,"score_spread":0.23957151354360384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614263794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92169356,0.003149152,0.009416584,0.015280538,0.00033573064,0.0029001678,0.0002858225,0.000136915,0.046801616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97131956,0.001893739,0.015557503,0.0018465312,0.00005308562,0.0005914732,0.00010174545,0.000056255016,0.008580132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94062495,0.031953853,0.0018945314,0.0030548335,0.014653122,0.007818766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9056868,0.034800816,0.010018319,0.0042810873,0.033211146,0.012001849],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03407518,0.00061488873,0.0006017806,0.0034062783,0.02176644,0.007567154,0.0048872097,0.0031572192,0.0021568348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0732481,0.0007246549,0.0007245975,0.007017591,0.006119741,0.0027647547,0.0055999137,0.0030828493,0.00030912453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004219909,0.0014722098,0.12912558,0.0018332958,0.00012111003,0.026136091,0.60370135,0.0026087842,0.003418627,0.027012333,0.02309333,0.18105543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010543266,0.0008547203,0.07759181,0.0014073851,0.00013513569,0.0069516934,0.67503166,0.0040392363,0.003086112,0.002000971,0.2285227,0.00027310595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8446228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9276936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0995001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17502172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7219271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782069798","doi":"10.1108/qae-10-2017-0068","title":"Towards a more meaningful involvement of librarians in academic program reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Process (computing); Perception; Best practice; Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Empirical research; Medical education; Psychology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Management; Medicine","score_opus":0.09567384585529323,"score_gpt":0.4566494543530439,"score_spread":0.3609756084977507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782069798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8053219,0.0033604165,0.059773006,0.042471334,0.00045496036,0.0035485392,0.00010339815,0.00077090197,0.08419553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558602,0.00086931547,0.030632295,0.005878934,0.00014451043,0.0013678522,0.000040837687,0.00013642076,0.005069684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.47876424,0.46376067,0.010422916,0.0090434775,0.028862521,0.009146214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5192856,0.32953334,0.049113583,0.02729919,0.051605612,0.023162633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18581207,0.00063613086,0.0009781977,0.0070650564,0.02791899,0.030911688,0.003996376,0.004487507,0.0030226344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23606512,0.0016066073,0.0008177586,0.005567139,0.019606,0.0148123475,0.020087767,0.005616613,0.0011255007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074078045,0.00043661226,0.02264871,0.00081923266,0.000042260966,0.0015945237,0.90721846,0.00016527322,0.0017927873,0.008901575,0.0031166247,0.05318982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045512294,0.0004367112,0.0118102385,0.0011477477,0.000049831455,0.0015887943,0.8846457,0.00041915118,0.002694522,0.0030890359,0.093973845,0.0000988753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009396091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017673273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18581207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018198976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056538887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175865406","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2020-0097","title":"Congruity and contradiction: student and institutional perspectives of learning and quality in higher education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Transformative learning; Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy); Higher education; Leverage (statistics); Contradiction; Rubric; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Pedagogy; Sociology; Public relations; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.23574825597133603,"score_gpt":0.5754441794370239,"score_spread":0.33969592346568783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175865406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629616,0.00071043166,0.0035023605,0.0069407322,0.00006062963,0.000026375003,0.000015261681,0.0000234264,0.025759188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990971,0.000102832855,0.00026295523,0.00019786514,0.000009249926,0.000007784014,0.0000040493187,0.000004947688,0.00031309368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618699,0.031788215,0.00083852373,0.0009138525,0.0028540231,0.0017355157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96485424,0.024085494,0.004359186,0.0015384329,0.0022212924,0.0029412527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028679956,0.0002667603,0.0004891843,0.0028275885,0.009054057,0.016890911,0.0012596486,0.0014724229,0.0022094902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03290546,0.00031295995,0.0004848731,0.0023233625,0.031302944,0.00782331,0.015387577,0.0039877947,0.0001370566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003599799,0.00007189049,0.024100678,0.000093938484,0.000020234162,0.00035190015,0.9276664,0.00010825202,0.0003091236,0.03575979,0.0004378858,0.01104386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003883625,0.00005142155,0.0055715987,0.000092649054,0.0000084387,0.00019063146,0.9802383,0.00015586108,0.00019091509,0.006462517,0.007019748,0.000014037426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002853663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002708033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028679956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00582848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075893416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15167588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200242489","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2021-0135","title":"The quality continuum: perceptions of institutional accreditation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Public relations; Bureaucracy; Higher education; Originality; Political science; Sociology; Focus group; Value (mathematics); Accountability; Qualitative research; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.04000685562762878,"score_gpt":0.4294286142086568,"score_spread":0.389421758581028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200242489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898093,0.00023622095,0.00048507587,0.0025358244,0.00002423777,0.000020365102,0.000010228494,0.000009481759,0.006869297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952555,0.00005929666,0.000083230734,0.00016439955,0.00000597462,0.0000054195307,0.0000046037,0.0000016430912,0.00014991923],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839326,0.008976582,0.0008396135,0.0005564832,0.003982315,0.0017124015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95257056,0.018396918,0.010719019,0.0013725591,0.0070467195,0.00989427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017326169,0.00016814728,0.0002665996,0.0014919349,0.005071248,0.007501434,0.0009094094,0.0010087466,0.0035723906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029476814,0.00023912944,0.00029367677,0.0014159118,0.010110158,0.0041810027,0.007476065,0.002607553,0.00016201938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018396943,0.0005768319,0.39986137,0.00021220601,0.00004695891,0.00033541798,0.5436105,0.000305644,0.001411667,0.014365278,0.0022141791,0.036875974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011964296,0.00027299364,0.15442257,0.00017108954,0.000009691395,0.00015033498,0.83350205,0.0004890897,0.00031095577,0.002672116,0.007954719,0.000032509863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069817537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017326169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005161768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060277316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09163058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280541748","doi":"10.1108/qae-08-2021-0122","title":"Higher education and the principles of access, quality and accountability: Brazil × Canada panorama","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Education and Public Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Higher education; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Originality; Government (linguistics); Quality management system; Democracy; Qualitative research; Political science; Marketing; Business; Economic growth; Quality management; Economics; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.09343709663231384,"score_gpt":0.4496629888437123,"score_spread":0.35622589221139844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280541748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6598834,0.009131691,0.0028248061,0.0628133,0.0001883019,0.0002740934,0.00059769617,0.000050891602,0.2642358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174,0.0016405624,0.0008898342,0.0008748414,0.000008469441,0.00001748549,0.000033230088,0.00000631977,0.0047891224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680173,0.00076868455,0.00008001372,0.00024832625,0.0010593844,0.001041976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615,0.0012596267,0.00034092553,0.00010745052,0.0013113655,0.00083063525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025396768,0.00020866033,0.00022128447,0.0012344891,0.010324381,0.004359024,0.0005388057,0.0008541006,0.00257509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005745203,0.0001750662,0.00017378425,0.003158276,0.0076228254,0.0014822404,0.0024512736,0.0013393499,0.00006629788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000745826,0.000094826246,0.06921512,0.0009907334,0.000041592462,0.0019805005,0.24700168,0.0008230221,0.002957321,0.5548422,0.014997165,0.106981225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002399573,0.0000771315,0.19253919,0.0015547728,0.00008655479,0.00067745644,0.3286189,0.0013559611,0.0013713273,0.023273135,0.45026988,0.00015167793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98535013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99242896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92607665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07392336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15547872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.536354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282838049","doi":"10.1108/qae-01-2022-0023","title":"Forming an academic program review learning community: description of a conceptual model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual model; Originality; Conceptual framework; Coaching; Knowledge management; Higher education; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.4163696404446108,"score_gpt":0.5642644332565905,"score_spread":0.1478947928119797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282838049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06461896,0.0018464702,0.6358845,0.08260454,0.00068233424,0.00581236,0.0002882321,0.00087464094,0.20738807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6362177,0.0010494243,0.3306806,0.0038825239,0.00033583608,0.006181058,0.00032638657,0.00019594638,0.021130538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96639585,0.022947978,0.0012317697,0.0027545677,0.004854859,0.0018148974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95666116,0.022154385,0.0044037327,0.0029287746,0.0057553416,0.008096577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028418465,0.00082424254,0.0006249264,0.00600361,0.012040578,0.021124227,0.0064760474,0.007488005,0.009121883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029240862,0.00097010494,0.0015892567,0.005051785,0.026252931,0.023704728,0.016508408,0.00627817,0.0021062966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026723783,0.00032581546,0.002298334,0.00020728863,0.000014466048,0.00053170195,0.02580268,0.0019966278,0.00026192845,0.9449456,0.003969438,0.019619444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240219,0.00043743744,0.0016306856,0.0009218169,0.00005505958,0.0016141733,0.049650386,0.04389079,0.0005354403,0.70536083,0.1955139,0.00016555953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009233881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006490975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028418465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016075013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031541698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.150293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284711440","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2022-0048","title":"Assuring online assessment quality: the case of unproctored online assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Originality; Psychology; Alternative assessment; Online assessment; Higher education; Medical education; Mathematics education; Marketing; Social psychology; Political science; Formative assessment; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.08445615915997876,"score_gpt":0.4978529657096593,"score_spread":0.4133968065496806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284711440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503308,0.0004736799,0.027394364,0.004827834,0.00017975176,0.00036727978,0.00007847008,0.00034960726,0.015998138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918394,0.00008346406,0.0068293405,0.00025649255,0.00005051115,0.00008512307,0.000024065495,0.00003852086,0.00079296756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8820926,0.075155795,0.0071008997,0.004783666,0.02750519,0.0033618882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5721168,0.25630218,0.07077416,0.051949937,0.04052335,0.008333618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045592066,0.00040215693,0.0004702998,0.0016908242,0.0026657574,0.006604106,0.001956272,0.001403258,0.0019002018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27287182,0.00045442482,0.0004849672,0.0017158623,0.0034879344,0.0053345934,0.004193322,0.0022890966,0.00046083474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001091985,0.0011100813,0.26395255,0.0009637869,0.00014991072,0.004723723,0.12546773,0.0028256783,0.008014844,0.00685573,0.0046499767,0.58019406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024991774,0.0038764977,0.6007203,0.0039264425,0.000306902,0.012737037,0.197466,0.03935359,0.028719297,0.02266387,0.08947458,0.0005055752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004956134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052700755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045592066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038032148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005856992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24111676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313320968","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2022-0030","title":"Institutional change through departmental quality assurance self-studies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Mandate; Quality (philosophy); Originality; Business; Public relations; Process management; Political science; Marketing; Sociology; Qualitative research; Service (business)","score_opus":0.2220539880728463,"score_gpt":0.49132053532574677,"score_spread":0.26926654725290045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313320968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92257434,0.0010070225,0.011054042,0.0071998243,0.00013988084,0.0016060728,0.00023157439,0.00025646007,0.055930693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958087,0.0002321711,0.0051572868,0.00044199193,0.000019858542,0.0003888142,0.00006881007,0.000028903296,0.0040813317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9033388,0.07850448,0.0024547433,0.0026094012,0.010207459,0.0028852096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7551298,0.12792805,0.02771603,0.022300495,0.055213314,0.011712291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07189768,0.00033756,0.0004174051,0.0040387986,0.0077311727,0.010021274,0.0019251755,0.0006278005,0.0026760916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09603605,0.00038487298,0.00051271584,0.0033718005,0.008573463,0.0033564637,0.008094159,0.0017525312,0.00028808904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016185126,0.0011579145,0.13777804,0.0007770705,0.000100782316,0.00023651231,0.5311864,0.00045664675,0.0015050895,0.019859212,0.009984744,0.29679576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007492577,0.0008635767,0.14374119,0.0010676428,0.00008034729,0.00018336107,0.7003393,0.001296784,0.003714851,0.0068256324,0.14169635,0.00011607763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03730463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07326312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07189768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02686558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03142441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3802358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714453","doi":"10.1108/qae-11-2023-0194","title":"Managing quality assurance at community colleges in Ontario, Canada: experiences and perspectives of front-line quality managers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Quality (philosophy); Quality policy; Thematic analysis; Originality; Accountability; Public relations; Quality management; Higher education; Qualitative research; Reflexivity; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.04814606394993914,"score_gpt":0.37362328880261153,"score_spread":0.3254772248526724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98677945,0.0006378871,0.00042390183,0.0056886123,0.000041571093,0.000078977195,0.00005223476,0.000017798831,0.00627962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943926,0.00032343826,0.00024801996,0.00096888473,0.000009318135,0.000019540135,0.000023537355,0.000008162789,0.004006488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948383,0.0016707333,0.000107826054,0.00032075171,0.0009828696,0.0020794526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98399484,0.0028168887,0.0015767128,0.00019527087,0.0028262609,0.008589969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033968382,0.00024981968,0.00032738477,0.0006835753,0.018933602,0.005096174,0.0014756086,0.0010541365,0.0038679724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007554956,0.0003078487,0.00017888907,0.0014326444,0.0075436984,0.0013794249,0.003823617,0.0019827415,0.00019926234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011474585,0.00017401368,0.06331725,0.00019204112,0.000009955757,0.0015331178,0.9014808,0.00010534683,0.0017457651,0.0015624377,0.006627808,0.023136785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065946547,0.00008867729,0.027968269,0.000103782775,0.000005355887,0.00014617582,0.946945,0.00013402902,0.00016733239,0.00014058907,0.024269309,0.000024897558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9053993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96612966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94303274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056967255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097341664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41332835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413941366","doi":"10.1108/qae-04-2025-0086","title":"Making curriculum review accountable – an impact study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Higher education; Business; Economics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.11687886737822746,"score_gpt":0.5930719048477306,"score_spread":0.4761930374695032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413941366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7759463,0.015685584,0.024644896,0.020660944,0.002337206,0.09860464,0.001497416,0.00056188856,0.06006113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90710837,0.0059810365,0.041667193,0.0046498873,0.0007574646,0.037367295,0.00044120915,0.00013048139,0.0018969793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.47650892,0.40821046,0.037218206,0.009876525,0.05997524,0.008210697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26865903,0.4845546,0.09790745,0.06410216,0.07028794,0.014488907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.29585564,0.0010055361,0.0018862294,0.008418393,0.004500208,0.011919081,0.0047970857,0.0028667075,0.005627476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5449529,0.0012589318,0.002983887,0.009894582,0.0060517313,0.011691809,0.013044085,0.0036250113,0.0007951129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00420658,0.019571166,0.108837426,0.03312867,0.0027908213,0.0009413288,0.062271137,0.0016724617,0.0018744695,0.0100317905,0.00681008,0.747864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016323866,0.06646009,0.38864788,0.066054866,0.012891856,0.0030994809,0.12995486,0.0067505897,0.014099693,0.02332664,0.27138394,0.001006174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024505989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041797366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29585564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01891932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045672014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86833537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414843603","doi":"10.1108/qae-02-2025-0061","title":"International research on accreditation as a strategy for educational quality: identification of patterns in scientific collaboration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality Assurance in Education","topic":"Educational Innovations and Challenges","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Internationalization; Identification (biology); Scopus; Higher education; Sample (material); Collaborative network","score_opus":0.18706357323726788,"score_gpt":0.5434066252512906,"score_spread":0.3563430520140227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414843603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80395246,0.040605005,0.032162495,0.010801351,0.00043920078,0.0009985893,0.0018714292,0.00016982136,0.1089996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98998964,0.0030878454,0.0052656424,0.0001989865,0.000074483214,0.0002579909,0.00031386458,0.000026928918,0.00078458176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9363759,0.032174356,0.009429259,0.0054102335,0.014780611,0.0018296519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60409266,0.268638,0.07036935,0.018716587,0.034038875,0.0041445172],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06175045,0.00031126713,0.0008723488,0.026168192,0.0021818026,0.011670923,0.001225749,0.00086248654,0.005754272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19018503,0.0002629501,0.00086777675,0.0558645,0.0052785715,0.009051474,0.005396545,0.0009530485,0.00046299974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029083504,0.00022149643,0.48027697,0.010364126,0.00092571863,0.00033517124,0.06479068,0.0012500599,0.0012560115,0.09043052,0.002922471,0.34693596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005004934,0.00036349724,0.7650963,0.010147581,0.00054031645,0.0007193362,0.13639824,0.0027424938,0.00200525,0.0378654,0.043973748,0.00009774564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003788582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036313634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97383183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060148174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014837739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32657152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}