{"meta":{"query_hash":"4cb78e555126","filters":{"venue":"Quantitative Science Studies"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4cb78e555126","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quantitative+Science+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2969944961","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00006","title":"Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Citation; Field (mathematics); Association (psychology); Interlocking; Editorial board; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics; Epistemology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10467017328342969,"score_gpt":0.42972936890547575,"score_spread":0.32505919562204605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969944961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892238,0.00029212644,0.0052660266,0.00013773964,0.00000712298,0.00007124736,0.0010826723,0.00003983179,0.0038794358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950342,0.00009842381,0.0037657002,0.000011344496,0.0000135828805,0.00007000978,0.00071044295,0.000009387479,0.00028679793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734795,0.0014558024,0.00015742236,0.00027984142,0.00063037925,0.00012860121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688135,0.024961898,0.0032536152,0.000864819,0.0014578708,0.000648387],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027444346,0.00025178358,0.00036691298,0.013710786,0.0007863576,0.0021903317,0.0004229931,0.00046155305,0.002199364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019862961,0.00015915757,0.00042984128,0.011159978,0.0012375277,0.0023410623,0.0015253694,0.00032726963,0.0002697169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064921094,0.0003293422,0.8186414,0.0015406127,0.0008193392,0.00081245386,0.06595371,0.0038645694,0.012322855,0.021225164,0.0015775774,0.0722638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002521295,0.00037117145,0.92612433,0.000121147794,0.00014772093,0.0011150099,0.04018613,0.012023088,0.0020451776,0.011504091,0.0062709358,0.00006600902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015063658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019360615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9862892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006486399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054149574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014514148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980178188","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00009","title":"On the topicality and research impact of special issues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Discipline; Scarcity; Analytics; Phenomenon; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Space (punctuation); Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; History","score_opus":0.8962515934314642,"score_gpt":0.756896630519447,"score_spread":0.1393549629120172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980178188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915494,0.019495599,0.006887805,0.006778569,0.00078830175,0.00019671771,0.0020502368,0.00014894687,0.07210442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913623,0.003145932,0.0013230041,0.0001949385,0.0012267306,0.00005936461,0.0007838331,0.000058219175,0.0018458739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816098,0.0056881276,0.002436488,0.0020936183,0.006767208,0.0014047136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73113656,0.15443802,0.058069464,0.014552085,0.032935046,0.008868918],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025173083,0.00036161556,0.0010828907,0.032854132,0.0024934427,0.011311466,0.00079711684,0.0011003311,0.007216699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1314865,0.00026944268,0.00077745266,0.030187396,0.003133863,0.009438893,0.0054655075,0.0016258917,0.0014845295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075801933,0.00021356791,0.7195765,0.0021128326,0.0005500537,0.0009544363,0.027034936,0.0009931938,0.00640719,0.03131407,0.008323135,0.20176212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025053665,0.00022253218,0.93781143,0.0005166923,0.00025503783,0.00066406315,0.01570928,0.0009496593,0.0020245947,0.013449197,0.028301839,0.00007064787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012378867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014571457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97482693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018747662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1331296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009935877","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00125","title":"Textual analysis of artificial intelligence manuscripts reveals features associated with peer review outcome","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Readability; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Jargon; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Similarity (geometry); Semantic similarity; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2643686269816425,"score_gpt":0.4440727271641647,"score_spread":0.1797041001825222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009935877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895063,0.0020230375,0.0026317053,0.0003634253,0.00019300928,0.00021101271,0.0021061744,0.00016126315,0.0028040938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937323,0.00046619037,0.0025612928,0.00006285754,0.00034130283,0.00016694036,0.0016498048,0.000064866705,0.0009544246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.978314,0.007804638,0.0054377806,0.0012832282,0.0067066285,0.00045371917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4752441,0.3367494,0.10840745,0.010771021,0.06276215,0.0060659093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01620158,0.00037759237,0.00092627626,0.010216025,0.0010322664,0.004175158,0.00074992725,0.00060676644,0.0037413926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19109039,0.00013415623,0.00057099015,0.0086664725,0.0010543284,0.0018192694,0.0012631628,0.000526311,0.0012678498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003961042,0.00076394016,0.80340534,0.0050210813,0.0008355247,0.0017780376,0.009656841,0.0014197073,0.023055157,0.0013710682,0.0065297945,0.14220247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008167922,0.0010937494,0.96641934,0.00029726102,0.000288043,0.0010399482,0.0054596853,0.002738531,0.008978086,0.0021151388,0.011349851,0.00013859828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024768588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032408003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065625214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007646052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013134734","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00036","title":"Who are the acknowledgees? An analysis of gender and academic status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Instituto de Salud Carlos III; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.21095443555355925,"score_gpt":0.4806547421617286,"score_spread":0.26970030660816935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013134734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930466,0.0006881919,0.00033379943,0.0006725946,0.00004152349,0.000013281593,0.00024939483,0.000003982852,0.004950705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985802,0.00015782067,0.000085838925,0.000045457207,0.000025037434,0.000011247242,0.000085607564,0.000003891104,0.0010049178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574834,0.0018186102,0.0005423988,0.00046634962,0.00091150217,0.0005129078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656321,0.014846286,0.012277552,0.0012740253,0.0031060101,0.0028641631],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067480956,0.00015736287,0.00031466858,0.0022226402,0.0010558175,0.0019486804,0.00049650663,0.0002906088,0.004910119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039097507,0.0001161227,0.00021795384,0.0025382459,0.0010665887,0.0023038283,0.001513014,0.0003726892,0.0007814435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002489827,0.00005368103,0.94633234,0.000120889825,0.000048285354,0.0002480084,0.027186587,0.000034611345,0.00044985168,0.002327432,0.0011518317,0.021797426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009649434,0.00012070785,0.9268155,0.00021904822,0.000038345937,0.00031941343,0.061614312,0.00022127485,0.00039868502,0.0016032262,0.008614948,0.000024866466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025320265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030954343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99777734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051555235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079734856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035687745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013695337","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00038","title":"Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Affect (linguistics); Gender disparity; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.7557475091659885,"score_gpt":0.6168525148930493,"score_spread":0.13889499427293928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013695337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739578,0.0059129796,0.00014163715,0.0005013557,0.000057512018,0.000035406963,0.009908669,0.000016181835,0.009468597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941046,0.0023689661,0.00034529893,0.00005378612,0.000034140805,0.000040769137,0.005047412,0.000009365408,0.0026897397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979432,0.00029552061,0.00037610435,0.00023534484,0.00080755836,0.0003423176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824332,0.004150919,0.0049260724,0.0006066114,0.006893771,0.0009894308],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042159283,0.00023183668,0.0006396991,0.01381514,0.00065436104,0.0014462213,0.00041422134,0.00020659792,0.0022970943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016412597,0.00012560036,0.0006696535,0.019245582,0.0004555256,0.0008031612,0.0014049527,0.00028886355,0.00032297705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028317844,0.000027772552,0.95039636,0.0009804841,0.00058034284,0.0001936609,0.0042856922,0.00040307236,0.00058538,0.001004062,0.0030128672,0.038247123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044970657,0.00001717474,0.9949326,0.00012101094,0.00008212448,0.000038008995,0.0014136991,0.000060568367,0.00018952064,0.000056697212,0.0030776088,0.000006578532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14254759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21545678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99578404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025576951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039592697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28343576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022460410","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00044","title":"How much research shared on Facebook happens outside of public pages and groups? A comparison of public and private online activity around PLOS ONE papers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Timeline; Openness to experience; Social media; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9412102896347241,"score_gpt":0.6538876646655836,"score_spread":0.2873226249691405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022460410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96326447,0.0037657097,0.0043929312,0.0030557567,0.00024678383,0.00014491839,0.0062075276,0.00009693381,0.018825056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935762,0.0011601982,0.0017720662,0.00021595495,0.00025509196,0.00021433915,0.0016776441,0.000032066313,0.0010964017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692975,0.018297194,0.004039188,0.0018413381,0.0057233777,0.00080144085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7612188,0.15489799,0.05469037,0.0121263815,0.012922877,0.0041435715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017414028,0.00024128846,0.0006676421,0.011640112,0.0013414928,0.0053677647,0.00057162455,0.0006005733,0.003154008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11951819,0.00022967154,0.00042716492,0.020940905,0.0016436981,0.0048470977,0.0041192886,0.0004632737,0.0005589326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064624293,0.00013211416,0.7556475,0.0039568385,0.00086864224,0.00043915716,0.06984172,0.00045716713,0.0037644617,0.008282621,0.007696361,0.14826724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028115053,0.00021771392,0.8664897,0.0011975461,0.0003270456,0.00060864567,0.059084836,0.0012909499,0.0032012882,0.0063974555,0.061052967,0.00010377259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008564313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018842948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98835987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010236093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092095315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032439792","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00069","title":"Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Demography; Field (mathematics); Demographic economics; Subject (documents); Citation impact; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Library science; Economics; Mathematics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.8348130930551083,"score_gpt":0.6305721392040463,"score_spread":0.204240953851062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032439792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882415,0.0041589215,0.0002736103,0.0013513436,0.000055793265,0.0000065365653,0.00050771504,0.00001023098,0.0053943414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983948,0.00047648893,0.00012946037,0.00009571946,0.000036206176,0.0000026701584,0.00013457461,0.000005032915,0.0007252024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998448,0.00037477215,0.00013547574,0.00036832673,0.0003635178,0.00030990512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855195,0.004914482,0.0058731493,0.0011542009,0.0010819737,0.0014566525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024565393,0.00016909976,0.0004892796,0.0028130542,0.0005631472,0.0011273866,0.00034005553,0.00045947012,0.0048315465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022195619,0.0001197395,0.00074563484,0.003396622,0.00063190254,0.0012289919,0.0010974371,0.00041850776,0.00037010826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012786554,0.000027360895,0.9747967,0.00012348569,0.00018961496,0.00010942793,0.0009301232,0.00012794606,0.0004766688,0.0011427691,0.0005791946,0.02136892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057524503,0.000047793685,0.9960872,0.000045799006,0.00006908852,0.00008635142,0.00069740706,0.00007918469,0.00021881014,0.00064634153,0.0020119734,0.0000043926993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009853894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022408174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99754345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064138306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014556804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01959306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038101076","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00055","title":"Beyond networks: Aligning qualitative and computational science studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Computer science; Dichotomy; Data science; Workflow; Domain (mathematical analysis); Epistemology; Point (geometry); Management science; Sociology; Cognitive science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3028395154045068,"score_gpt":0.5582822649915379,"score_spread":0.25544274958703106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038101076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1091286,0.019890651,0.6963977,0.077245295,0.0016463291,0.001040179,0.0010195039,0.00032596028,0.093305685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8532441,0.0072319712,0.12949643,0.003491564,0.0005668319,0.002734095,0.00039456194,0.00027605347,0.002564356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8893616,0.09614995,0.0025983034,0.0033633986,0.0072776796,0.0012490328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6487746,0.32163748,0.008481227,0.010116873,0.009199488,0.0017902198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1206099,0.00094882696,0.0012104386,0.017796487,0.0047826134,0.017972672,0.0032151102,0.0022887788,0.003888582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17297174,0.00067714456,0.0005428836,0.017068166,0.030409615,0.031910166,0.012167414,0.0033843461,0.00046807213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005357929,0.000076115735,0.0045413803,0.0016231217,0.00006480739,0.00023319728,0.14803827,0.0017070902,0.00045647798,0.78932875,0.0023863784,0.05149086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021314925,0.00005217734,0.0022752471,0.0027475108,0.000027158248,0.0001219079,0.17563146,0.005877959,0.0005552144,0.7452935,0.0673525,0.000044026856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004127256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053656725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010963931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009444231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63785374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084189430","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00086","title":"Using web content analysis to create innovation indicators—What do we really measure?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Confirmatory factor analysis; Content analysis; Measure (data warehouse); Business; Government (linguistics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Marketing; Data mining; Sociology","score_opus":0.37202218042634905,"score_gpt":0.41837195312322295,"score_spread":0.0463497726968739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084189430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73181957,0.0061305473,0.18545233,0.008333942,0.0007011026,0.002134126,0.008946563,0.0012863365,0.055195436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8878089,0.0020241265,0.10227347,0.00064138,0.00026004273,0.0017478009,0.0032309073,0.00023264549,0.0017808324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98263115,0.0067955414,0.0015332116,0.00090143125,0.0072684432,0.0008701697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8418081,0.09327052,0.018160125,0.006415201,0.03757911,0.0027670462],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018054135,0.00074977113,0.0010095407,0.023665909,0.00093989016,0.0059974045,0.0010137608,0.0010929618,0.0016005436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113358535,0.00033552523,0.0007158222,0.022244917,0.0019245929,0.010101219,0.0016061807,0.0012227811,0.0010768053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018755432,0.00037676052,0.5358268,0.0018910712,0.00047538144,0.00009440101,0.008384641,0.0013363538,0.0035618742,0.011108751,0.00741412,0.4293424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098374665,0.0007344981,0.7861138,0.00435545,0.0007061151,0.00051548297,0.031195916,0.028792173,0.014223477,0.038553644,0.09429447,0.00041660847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012823845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011353426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035734095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005030294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09548056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113126806","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00097","title":"Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Division of labour; Taxonomy (biology); General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.8339422120845222,"score_gpt":0.6137471753924978,"score_spread":0.22019503669202445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113126806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90838003,0.0030966757,0.030659553,0.0054240185,0.0006087603,0.0016247826,0.006611419,0.00012356852,0.043471146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202413,0.0007193495,0.011711269,0.00019476199,0.0001684758,0.0011004824,0.0015583701,0.000037241443,0.0024859677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548662,0.018021002,0.0060689943,0.0032813756,0.014364288,0.003398169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62500685,0.223794,0.085771106,0.016770631,0.039790314,0.008867005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056259077,0.0006422642,0.0008017321,0.028155759,0.004179544,0.007318163,0.002032688,0.00091011723,0.008009463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24749303,0.00032161313,0.0006376794,0.03253124,0.003386864,0.008720617,0.008686462,0.0013441894,0.0010382427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003222899,0.00012720564,0.8202268,0.0010047149,0.00015112298,0.00024405077,0.038838677,0.00093348173,0.0006961598,0.04212181,0.008701865,0.0866318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014420593,0.00032750986,0.72167134,0.002176329,0.00013311926,0.0005401767,0.1200398,0.006357121,0.001505403,0.07167762,0.07526622,0.00016122675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072720908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009319905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97184426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004441045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009506569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118099553","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00104","title":"The institutionalized stratification of the Chinese higher education system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meritocracy; Excellence; China; Hierarchy; Government (linguistics); Inequality; Empirical research; Political science; Statistical analysis; Economic growth; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1394733721977589,"score_gpt":0.4788295273824484,"score_spread":0.3393561551846895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118099553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826685,0.00019350559,0.0006815329,0.00073835696,0.000009519258,0.00003188888,0.00012345304,0.000011160175,0.015542136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961805,0.00002141345,0.000058853675,0.000017068696,0.0000023672044,0.000004917542,0.000014362677,5.557511e-7,0.00026239175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983316,0.000497416,0.00008414092,0.0002509673,0.0003443184,0.00049153983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820566,0.00020033734,0.000529947,0.00032884956,0.00033715405,0.00039799415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014466454,0.0001262672,0.0002064341,0.0023680157,0.0025521587,0.002179379,0.0004228532,0.00018375987,0.0023466148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002312767,0.000094046474,0.00013037486,0.0026183173,0.0045828763,0.00079258485,0.0018082312,0.00028661624,0.000105461244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019545379,0.00013387199,0.46484825,0.00012709737,0.00013586052,0.00045272635,0.025967447,0.0020833458,0.003155805,0.44536665,0.0018757221,0.055657744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042754906,0.000092172166,0.93303335,0.00007827363,0.00005550098,0.000067999856,0.0067930897,0.0027892906,0.0005672216,0.045779027,0.010654162,0.000047125446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05220539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063601345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05220539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008005539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069582714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10380304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175903833","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00142","title":"Uncited papers are not useless","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Citation; Poisson process; Measure (data warehouse); Poisson distribution; The arts; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.891090757630023,"score_gpt":0.6925934581402525,"score_spread":0.19849729948977046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175903833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468812,0.0034472316,0.019792005,0.003568254,0.00023268125,0.000039266237,0.0012712613,0.0004373221,0.024330767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491876,0.00047151936,0.0015329504,0.00014222195,0.00011647783,0.000015182354,0.00031401962,0.000057302357,0.0024315177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248075,0.0022266072,0.000697473,0.0014202142,0.002520205,0.0006548417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8182799,0.11229154,0.030913234,0.0189161,0.013750462,0.005848796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007044163,0.00035064697,0.0013297759,0.0076574855,0.0022729135,0.006618687,0.0015533468,0.0017146082,0.0074049835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14762951,0.00053521525,0.00054735277,0.011136639,0.0036091579,0.008088101,0.0018553388,0.0017554717,0.0018081029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023948392,0.00051010645,0.28957927,0.0014626367,0.0009428832,0.002653953,0.008153694,0.051191587,0.010786427,0.34345838,0.023490498,0.26537573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020678288,0.00043856207,0.21103026,0.00045030098,0.0003438117,0.0049028057,0.003543882,0.10167608,0.01216427,0.62561625,0.03938423,0.00024274572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013634617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011757738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99295586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022277683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012714087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03725356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211790144","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00153","title":"L’Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at <i>Quantitative Science Studies</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15812121062236095,"score_gpt":0.4718197526596155,"score_spread":0.31369854203725456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211790144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041094612,0.0019978196,0.016687728,0.78629684,0.0029442126,0.00004097399,0.00013333469,0.00020601376,0.1505985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71832144,0.00096434704,0.008320483,0.19441731,0.0021863545,0.00029433536,0.000102999635,0.0005288352,0.074863866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9299316,0.051038843,0.001246963,0.0038259001,0.0101823,0.0037744762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76213294,0.20763646,0.00627616,0.009453011,0.01037819,0.0041233334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.080277905,0.0005659736,0.0009581384,0.0036469847,0.028120272,0.026854211,0.002027345,0.0115262205,0.009330323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1665001,0.0007427322,0.0008836999,0.0031319163,0.04232256,0.013333244,0.008491155,0.019491607,0.0018476476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037437,0.000022782173,0.0023526843,0.0000479705,0.000013311859,0.00021241671,0.039187733,0.00008818624,0.0002715864,0.892422,0.053965867,0.011378038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030439216,0.000045492707,0.006095643,0.00044121247,0.000018991439,0.00036677913,0.045650147,0.00084669626,0.0021978884,0.5238657,0.42032686,0.00011416041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02272147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037744645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014458938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009984513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42455524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207049150","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00180","title":"Predicting the impact of <i>American Economic Review</i> articles by author characteristics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publication; Exploit; Quarter (Canadian coin); Institution; Political science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; History; Law","score_opus":0.6240591201744193,"score_gpt":0.6427755631256137,"score_spread":0.018716442951194345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207049150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97245806,0.007553443,0.0008894891,0.0028253486,0.00029361653,0.00005993408,0.0030230617,0.00006640332,0.012830742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952058,0.0019106198,0.00045681308,0.00015382678,0.0003193764,0.000024963849,0.0010369933,0.000012600696,0.00087899703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421024,0.002581857,0.00071897294,0.00048773544,0.0017037648,0.00029751798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8359869,0.10428921,0.037166752,0.0029424378,0.01437742,0.0052373223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009254366,0.0002736734,0.00065778155,0.008566483,0.00045114435,0.003696843,0.00036910814,0.000657419,0.004019056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090548106,0.00015945743,0.0004970827,0.0122705065,0.0003685262,0.0012967088,0.00069876394,0.00052914576,0.0013975279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015519263,0.00009611973,0.97375286,0.00022108032,0.00041928276,0.00011754607,0.00007990583,0.00092831807,0.00027627795,0.00037329318,0.0070619886,0.016518218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036971316,0.00012418367,0.9860504,0.00013527156,0.0004348969,0.00016054232,0.00031813886,0.0051815095,0.00048538443,0.000641025,0.0064155743,0.000016067012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002946346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00452936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007308902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009282703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048942327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226297244","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00178","title":"Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Bibliometrics; Epistemology; Point (geometry); Sociology; Classics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4986595425254802,"score_gpt":0.570894191989019,"score_spread":0.0722346494635388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226297244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001070631,0.00091427146,0.00030556883,0.99434423,0.0041016657,0.0000017779072,0.000010654267,0.000009507167,0.00020530695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016599277,0.0023811713,0.0017817649,0.93290716,0.04460772,0.00007026689,0.000026026064,0.00010398133,0.0015226406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8607455,0.091678426,0.008778015,0.011122165,0.025205394,0.0024705399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.41763264,0.5000102,0.01609145,0.010935878,0.04608128,0.009248546],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12460789,0.0010930591,0.003665998,0.004893558,0.009547488,0.021323802,0.0039085997,0.034937795,0.00454343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43478817,0.0012041584,0.0013877235,0.0060067605,0.04655663,0.023563754,0.00814468,0.0792421,0.0027600164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088381144,0.000031258103,0.00041787792,0.00021306917,0.000042457494,0.00012758312,0.0027793408,0.00018498886,0.000093025694,0.105406955,0.8787865,0.011828511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015958169,0.00005342091,0.0012229213,0.0021323895,0.000033000393,0.00026783664,0.003975192,0.0018381819,0.0005709153,0.35458168,0.63488543,0.0002794785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00466142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030698208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99510646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012440816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010565812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6589974},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4283364764","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00184","title":"Center–periphery structure in research communities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Thomas and Stacey Siebel Foundation; University of Victoria; Grainger Foundation; Washington University in St. Louis; Google","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Pipeline (software); Data science; Citation; Subject (documents); Cluster analysis; Community structure; Center (category theory); Computer science; Geography; Library science; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31198559172603607,"score_gpt":0.5164166050925184,"score_spread":0.20443101336648234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283364764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5765391,0.0019598866,0.40763345,0.0013437693,0.00006399623,0.00026316463,0.0011021293,0.0009799509,0.0101146195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064335,0.00022146614,0.09091744,0.00008278521,0.000045280125,0.00008636792,0.00053567084,0.000078201905,0.0015992459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769694,0.00071156974,0.000107998305,0.00068002107,0.0006078565,0.0001955716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760533,0.012064608,0.003429492,0.0015737697,0.0055657076,0.0013132095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034891344,0.0003087911,0.00063915574,0.006457169,0.0019171123,0.0030276664,0.0008886547,0.001300846,0.0033680128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02460096,0.0005024492,0.0005219454,0.0034749282,0.0023006375,0.0036077143,0.0026160916,0.00068330404,0.00075325376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017619481,0.00042624943,0.13008623,0.0013701294,0.00038319867,0.0008379999,0.007230356,0.1480152,0.047455415,0.403608,0.017476441,0.24134886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019059677,0.00018456824,0.04196596,0.00021052701,0.00015232118,0.0010170693,0.0017144404,0.60376406,0.01574871,0.3199979,0.014949138,0.00010468751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029109877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022081293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99651086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014435209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001139472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018452525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285182479","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00197","title":"Values matter in science, so do facts: Response to Gingras","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"License; Citation; Icon; Library science; Attribution; History; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.22266810447710297,"score_gpt":0.5672341325089335,"score_spread":0.34456602803183056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285182479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021047574,0.0015565985,0.000071325325,0.9884022,0.009217824,0.0000031933157,0.000015471429,0.00001554446,0.0005073503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056273933,0.0009930618,0.00020861832,0.97814584,0.011822111,0.000012691041,0.000009376726,0.000038096347,0.0031428204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98713976,0.00622729,0.0010800603,0.0018191781,0.0027490861,0.0009846907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340106,0.04161118,0.003820699,0.0016066484,0.014159139,0.004791766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015810182,0.0013832116,0.0021275016,0.00087877526,0.008185865,0.00924202,0.0024737923,0.027834957,0.005072417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06875429,0.001038231,0.0013884908,0.0014351029,0.012956572,0.009587224,0.004771781,0.05705375,0.0036058929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056823956,0.00001515403,0.00021268085,0.000087572786,0.000011304151,0.00043609695,0.0040862286,0.000060497096,0.00018740025,0.00641462,0.98485166,0.0035799427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030653446,0.000056629327,0.0006135532,0.00052073895,0.000012475978,0.0006377146,0.010110971,0.0002573091,0.00041564333,0.010264379,0.9769717,0.00010833102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011171182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012630133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99181414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084424885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009722959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08361322},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4293243777","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00205","title":"Visualizing academic descendants using modified Pavlo diagrams: Results based on five researchers in biomechanics and biomedicine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomedicine; Graduation (instrument); Mentorship; Computer science; Graduate students; Completeness (order theory); Data science; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Medical education; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Biology","score_opus":0.9158299019598442,"score_gpt":0.7019936612882616,"score_spread":0.21383624067158258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293243777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8474289,0.0013310057,0.12298717,0.0009797434,0.00023364207,0.0004257697,0.0076726116,0.008023485,0.010917644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76655287,0.00032113423,0.22147685,0.000073237454,0.000048709815,0.00015830639,0.008260792,0.00064207835,0.002466023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969409,0.0015756274,0.00018802559,0.0005446281,0.0005754834,0.0001753367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767517,0.017283311,0.0009727352,0.001716054,0.0027182424,0.0005580169],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050313035,0.00091037736,0.0007059506,0.011644134,0.0008457546,0.0029931248,0.00079984847,0.0009771283,0.0037485745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025095386,0.00025421043,0.0010115625,0.0054826457,0.0005397697,0.0019883967,0.0019798903,0.0008013922,0.0011378147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001738311,0.0008268477,0.16935197,0.0016511386,0.00058981817,0.0008616867,0.0076229027,0.08870227,0.011284398,0.016782226,0.032498673,0.66808975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018760841,0.00047191433,0.095038414,0.00043137895,0.00034058368,0.0007240717,0.006240692,0.80025965,0.017231198,0.022379559,0.05649912,0.00019587547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010472703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011225772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093898975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009724049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026608407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295878695","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00211","title":"Assessing the quality of bibliographic data sources for measuring international research collaboration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Quality (philosophy); Digital library; Data quality; Information retrieval; Conceptual framework; Metric (unit); Engineering","score_opus":0.9238412134420332,"score_gpt":0.7257074572657539,"score_spread":0.19813375617627926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295878695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4856026,0.010572758,0.4297014,0.010621748,0.00055240706,0.004984461,0.011774017,0.00088147155,0.04530913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7792274,0.0013210233,0.21365996,0.00028347428,0.000117206895,0.0023948739,0.0024400053,0.00012621851,0.00042979597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6222311,0.22795218,0.057135627,0.0080725625,0.08214864,0.0024598415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15285233,0.58059454,0.101243846,0.05624374,0.10617943,0.0028860632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24914871,0.00083189795,0.0018517211,0.04592167,0.0037256677,0.01731058,0.0028223898,0.0019697384,0.002298253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66936564,0.0009177523,0.0019448875,0.07601613,0.004433288,0.013006404,0.009909271,0.0021391516,0.00045805585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000775507,0.0004930596,0.48340476,0.007956148,0.0018955374,0.00016615444,0.01532057,0.0073227594,0.002525569,0.09677021,0.006529708,0.37684005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006451096,0.0015396156,0.47494292,0.019930435,0.0034801615,0.0008036497,0.046249628,0.07936544,0.040561,0.22945334,0.10193083,0.0010978326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053881393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006136108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007927168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311844276","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00228","title":"Recalibrating the scope of scholarly publishing: A modest step in a vast decolonization process","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Stanford Graduate School of Education","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Portuguese; Scope (computer science); Library science; Diversity (politics); Indonesian; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Political science; Discipline; Social science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7607194694388768,"score_gpt":0.6363862618839845,"score_spread":0.1243332075548923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311844276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7104965,0.010019179,0.08593052,0.10866161,0.00288985,0.0019325333,0.001162652,0.0021697243,0.076737404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93607324,0.0016532743,0.035893455,0.010151776,0.0011509816,0.00082770095,0.00051207887,0.0012343097,0.012503198],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9231367,0.034716237,0.007882959,0.008212504,0.021559127,0.004492474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6013582,0.17114149,0.05712403,0.08690189,0.07758004,0.005894414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11092256,0.00073007675,0.0014311227,0.0117072575,0.0055916402,0.011929717,0.0033697002,0.0014214992,0.0041352636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24686375,0.00069410534,0.0010222041,0.012751004,0.014916303,0.009960329,0.012631745,0.0042055515,0.002062453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004663254,0.00030843663,0.11804798,0.0022683134,0.0003539904,0.00056891795,0.09431422,0.0015464454,0.012166699,0.15670288,0.042032383,0.57122344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009726045,0.0006141354,0.19255063,0.0034065347,0.0003037629,0.0010132409,0.07158122,0.005051692,0.017005613,0.06681373,0.6412317,0.00033046282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069762943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009017284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98829275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073008835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01210907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5866216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321611368","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00248","title":"Impact of geographic diversity on citation of collaborative research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Citation; Perspective (graphical); Geographical distance; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Scale (ratio); Data science; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.9158071959647329,"score_gpt":0.7441541280930054,"score_spread":0.17165306787172752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321611368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97379285,0.0040271054,0.0030552153,0.0023358057,0.00014454334,0.00003497796,0.0009698585,0.00006516695,0.015574525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.00022182157,0.00024892497,0.000029021998,0.00006261528,0.0000073276724,0.00011526887,0.000007112906,0.00024026113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845803,0.008256318,0.001045821,0.001459303,0.0037203033,0.0009380667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76233906,0.16839218,0.0357569,0.01196968,0.01353035,0.008011813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010901196,0.00034459127,0.00093162706,0.007311363,0.0016026961,0.0053089485,0.00081189844,0.0007053783,0.005282757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1338185,0.00011687242,0.00059944385,0.016666384,0.002440693,0.0033328466,0.0052115284,0.00089099765,0.0005947313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061132474,0.00015930015,0.8945565,0.00086374703,0.0011972947,0.00053339987,0.004189442,0.0079950495,0.0016905895,0.012090709,0.0027776437,0.07333508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006853459,0.00036972607,0.926482,0.00048529456,0.0007060573,0.0007917058,0.0086164735,0.009594767,0.0024806322,0.03812312,0.012174264,0.000107327716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032514636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029696587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99268866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016173074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015111623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05765176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356342","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00250","title":"An open data set of scholars on Twitter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Event (particle physics); Set (abstract data type); Open data; Matching (statistics); Open science; World Wide Web; Data set; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9676859895836807,"score_gpt":0.7752727570725012,"score_spread":0.19241323251117948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6874329,0.00045155594,0.009526263,0.0011018598,0.00027188778,0.0015642092,0.2702712,0.000556376,0.028823772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66945213,0.00045510058,0.027024213,0.00028902997,0.00026818563,0.0034187748,0.28735077,0.000106893574,0.011634863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965397,0.0007125914,0.00065147877,0.0004751407,0.0013572525,0.00026384433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780036,0.0043735304,0.0017744551,0.0020923868,0.0032007734,0.00075841707],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021351278,0.00034634472,0.00051205605,0.010276461,0.001535532,0.001955655,0.0008962345,0.0011905114,0.0061502135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01495318,0.00014470899,0.00033818732,0.014702383,0.0006213839,0.0013640539,0.0021939457,0.00046428296,0.003575157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020655931,0.0016636855,0.5012554,0.0021670095,0.00022223001,0.0041629067,0.011431776,0.0087869335,0.015175332,0.026431441,0.12147872,0.30515897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027437648,0.0005743011,0.3866897,0.0005534151,0.0001772874,0.002023381,0.020628883,0.028238203,0.025591522,0.01327034,0.5217655,0.00021302902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006638138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010426546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016372981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02057451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386601204","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00264","title":"Tracing data: A survey investigating disciplinary differences in data citation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Communications Research Centre Canada; Université de Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"High Energy Physics; CERN; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Discipline; Citation; Data science; Tracing; Data sharing; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Computer science; Reuse; Survey data collection; Citation analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Statistics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.822593535018854,"score_gpt":0.5661646224853495,"score_spread":0.2564289125335045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386601204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904957,0.0024714319,0.0016851916,0.0016172109,0.000023136376,0.000068840454,0.00090836524,0.000026211099,0.0027039894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946656,0.001966477,0.0017291949,0.0003428449,0.000026616533,0.00012989457,0.0006727628,0.000024654775,0.0004420185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95114404,0.024277415,0.0097031705,0.0033110473,0.010171498,0.0013929065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57123476,0.29819998,0.06853728,0.015269213,0.040873367,0.0058854003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05404024,0.00019762453,0.00069767796,0.013806034,0.0015885888,0.004059137,0.0012094566,0.0011522296,0.0012627575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22206569,0.00044300093,0.00047314275,0.021968888,0.0016354767,0.0049197273,0.0030773806,0.00093914935,0.0004789985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008607671,0.00009378694,0.8643249,0.0009792191,0.00013152158,0.00015748129,0.062224887,0.00015002284,0.0008065452,0.0015200543,0.0017358258,0.067789555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018562987,0.00020708246,0.8146099,0.0012774031,0.00008467467,0.0008592387,0.14850527,0.001092401,0.0011628416,0.0025492024,0.029533995,0.00009942872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035191872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040531154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98619395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001831735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00277793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2857955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388465513","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00272","title":"The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publication; Publishing; Oligopoly; Library science; The Internet; Economics; Business; Political science; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Finance; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.8782480311744858,"score_gpt":0.6940854257892891,"score_spread":0.1841626053851967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388465513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82143945,0.0056790365,0.015133667,0.041018195,0.00029986026,0.0001094236,0.0010952686,0.00017945099,0.11504565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959804,0.0007235104,0.0006735885,0.00073972234,0.00008027286,0.000012318052,0.00008349008,0.000016563235,0.0016902051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953577,0.0015970457,0.00021722658,0.0005388986,0.001424655,0.00086442416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96866834,0.015233049,0.0065883948,0.0011828636,0.003646031,0.004681313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005890005,0.00023094978,0.00039057483,0.0029328817,0.0016394156,0.012201296,0.0008405173,0.0012881971,0.008275636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029630668,0.00037825384,0.0005807636,0.0047037583,0.0034050161,0.008406297,0.0023400811,0.0017372709,0.00086418196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071408326,0.00028921323,0.24851656,0.0005962308,0.00042144617,0.0014922426,0.005189409,0.027231177,0.0019567402,0.5168562,0.037702233,0.15903448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020385502,0.00039491916,0.33388197,0.00089418114,0.000290082,0.0010078807,0.018911695,0.079055525,0.0029264782,0.41586766,0.14617182,0.00039400838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132956905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012677202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067827036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035321717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049212217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390511741","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00282","title":"Unreviewed science in the news: The evolution of preprint media coverage from 2014–2021","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Preprint; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Journalism; Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Media studies; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Virology","score_opus":0.19069987931136004,"score_gpt":0.4933801193258072,"score_spread":0.30268024001444715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390511741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802388,0.002073048,0.00054857007,0.0047582365,0.00017222109,0.000028072094,0.005501604,0.00006009613,0.006619237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946015,0.00097476516,0.00026071593,0.0003167185,0.00042983273,0.000032649423,0.0024430817,0.000038040504,0.0009028056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147934,0.0027014976,0.0011046871,0.0011217116,0.0027338036,0.00085897517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7866299,0.10178372,0.08265848,0.0046718856,0.01875852,0.0054974137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011392693,0.00022857857,0.00040858376,0.008113058,0.00078170386,0.005193015,0.0007872465,0.0009226702,0.0045808363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09954014,0.0002411608,0.00030395912,0.008396783,0.0013538407,0.0039118384,0.002740702,0.0015118179,0.0009408883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065278116,0.000112524714,0.92045105,0.00066129974,0.00022374584,0.00035105838,0.027790295,0.00027510265,0.0015062102,0.0018821679,0.007492153,0.03860168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009836581,0.00009225305,0.96989113,0.000254493,0.00004211377,0.00019681401,0.016062917,0.00046100933,0.00079534197,0.0004984771,0.011656936,0.00003860223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054823672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034625283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013283292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008767842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060251057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391464262","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00285","title":"Large-scale text analysis using generative language models: A case study in discovering public value expressions in AI patents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Snap","keywords":"Generative grammar; Natural language processing; Scale (ratio); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Generative model; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Machine learning; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25531694364165575,"score_gpt":0.5238114656364624,"score_spread":0.26849452199480667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391464262","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46258208,0.0004235735,0.5261752,0.003677132,0.00004844311,0.0003389884,0.00087570574,0.0019821343,0.0038967219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77308,0.000108662585,0.22470868,0.00026245625,0.00004158982,0.0001624041,0.0007742187,0.00014394685,0.00071820896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233574,0.0058566844,0.0002286763,0.0005680568,0.00088404457,0.0001268321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8808862,0.11023903,0.0026419878,0.0036599543,0.0021685683,0.00040428503],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009732377,0.00048070418,0.00039096785,0.0024772615,0.0011264408,0.001623267,0.0012117282,0.0012215036,0.0009783691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038440026,0.0002860266,0.000910308,0.002155135,0.0020704907,0.002982442,0.0012794001,0.0019326498,0.0003083381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006728482,0.0012933348,0.0704818,0.0008389166,0.0002853562,0.0050614835,0.01671035,0.27533424,0.030622063,0.11988041,0.016203418,0.46261588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054652275,0.00010442538,0.0059297676,0.000047308204,0.000036228692,0.00036051832,0.0013140085,0.92056894,0.0128338775,0.053010907,0.0056778346,0.00006151064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005144007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077174962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015546394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011062288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05147034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391884287","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00288","title":"Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Scopus; Field (mathematics); Web of science; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.8724255180851594,"score_gpt":0.6912206117189744,"score_spread":0.18120490636618503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391884287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663467,0.0044257487,0.0042632837,0.0012659533,0.00019034272,0.000092663155,0.0071815755,0.000097821314,0.016136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929,0.00080682896,0.0017712292,0.000047605427,0.000097474054,0.00005092745,0.0037204837,0.000029828241,0.0005756536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97810274,0.0057015857,0.0061019175,0.0014234234,0.0076600835,0.0010102708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69492114,0.13667408,0.0988521,0.013325711,0.051322598,0.0049043684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02274867,0.00026149405,0.0010381932,0.040258676,0.0010651549,0.007577675,0.0009396018,0.0007389318,0.0028503637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20219103,0.00021825913,0.0006121225,0.075817905,0.0013596488,0.008227471,0.003553885,0.0007139096,0.0008019406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029352854,0.00012118092,0.9215831,0.0009267755,0.0004991713,0.00016072292,0.0019553003,0.0011236904,0.00046958725,0.004706498,0.0029633392,0.065197125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020949521,0.00013462923,0.9746621,0.00076984364,0.0002211275,0.00029010884,0.005111012,0.0036188383,0.0012672008,0.0047505875,0.0090841465,0.00006948669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008291723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00815599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97725135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016575475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024049548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12030786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392122745","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00296","title":"Do you cite what you tweet? Investigating the relationship between tweeting and citing research articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Academic institution; Institution; Positive correlation; Unit (ring theory); Social media; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.9203955165518652,"score_gpt":0.6926351140286738,"score_spread":0.2277604025231914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392122745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99199474,0.0011388718,0.0010387327,0.0010820132,0.00008411468,0.00002599338,0.00073099585,0.000019498837,0.003885144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971112,0.0005836169,0.0003902401,0.00007449579,0.00013344576,0.000027049065,0.00039331563,0.000009120537,0.0012774809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962288,0.0013039467,0.0005546728,0.00048417586,0.0011166391,0.00031171137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.813083,0.123767756,0.0468579,0.0032440186,0.008638078,0.0044093286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004859995,0.00022729745,0.00047437765,0.006275053,0.00088483945,0.0031158703,0.00053328654,0.0010308851,0.0043687406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092336535,0.00015957789,0.00040221825,0.012910613,0.00051152136,0.0027470617,0.001254355,0.0010017329,0.0012514621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001726748,0.00010602928,0.97858447,0.0001961237,0.00027740796,0.00015643639,0.0023981996,0.0002185351,0.00039218066,0.00067624846,0.0008757566,0.015945893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110638075,0.00011884192,0.9846519,0.00014882011,0.00021078828,0.0002727257,0.0062419376,0.0020674912,0.0006202618,0.0016698038,0.0039545805,0.000031847132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036168948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006128729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048270432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025702417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392454393","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00298","title":"Second-order citations in altmetrics: A case study analyzing the audiences of COVID-19 research in the news and on social media","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Altmetrics; Social media; Order (exchange); CITES; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.5820455615646037,"score_gpt":0.6069358497101962,"score_spread":0.024890288145592465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392454393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97941554,0.0012397676,0.0039951797,0.0022717502,0.00006576801,0.00021324487,0.0009867878,0.00005808951,0.011753914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892163,0.000641553,0.0070946226,0.00031344,0.00016094276,0.0002480489,0.00057280465,0.00007416012,0.0016780637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727015,0.016126571,0.0022078615,0.0013436207,0.006410328,0.001210061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60880905,0.31962228,0.036081754,0.009264063,0.022545889,0.0036769966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035062604,0.0004219651,0.0007204603,0.02477495,0.006085269,0.006568937,0.0014431676,0.0023407694,0.0034246435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123717315,0.00037519867,0.00051608804,0.031039529,0.0040290398,0.0063400753,0.004884407,0.0018092842,0.00065101724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029605473,0.00060245907,0.41723242,0.0018002538,0.00014280695,0.007601742,0.45673725,0.0006581476,0.0033873385,0.021826243,0.0068824585,0.08283289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052473522,0.00039894102,0.34606153,0.0020913214,0.0001537523,0.0050497865,0.5302473,0.0074277045,0.005247533,0.014348594,0.088738784,0.0001823748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077000577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017084759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97522503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004943135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027731012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18543094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392474250","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00300","title":"The gendered structure of science does not transpire in an experimental vacuum","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Observational study; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.17560379922613156,"score_gpt":0.4929933936704603,"score_spread":0.31738959444432874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392474250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084939495,0.02044287,0.26824796,0.36992407,0.018485136,0.0031944537,0.0020022101,0.0007092729,0.2320546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80996287,0.0042819697,0.08682131,0.07278741,0.0077210977,0.0072233304,0.0003776062,0.00043294084,0.010391467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8329678,0.12493211,0.0041269828,0.01697478,0.018591952,0.0024063652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.777317,0.1681553,0.0111952955,0.033214103,0.0073147723,0.0028035482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19217423,0.0007631596,0.0022143112,0.0025122592,0.0049704523,0.008875511,0.0029806572,0.0043108403,0.012363447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24155241,0.0011647247,0.0012864212,0.0016292257,0.07143716,0.016714418,0.011108092,0.009588328,0.0017092787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029801752,0.000115300805,0.0019255078,0.00056736707,0.00020674948,0.000068758905,0.004716537,0.00014212719,0.00051530584,0.9703518,0.006164746,0.014927752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038325923,0.00032307074,0.002266273,0.0006886421,0.00009788758,0.00013623525,0.0020383717,0.00055425154,0.0005731005,0.93973434,0.05314045,0.00006413236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020637028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016059949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99502957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005177743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051628817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996193},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4393164122","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00304","title":"Evaluating approaches to identifying research supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Syddansk Universitet","keywords":"Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Political science; Process management; Management science; Computer science; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.949022836235384,"score_gpt":0.7319454571991254,"score_spread":0.21707737903625857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393164122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38686988,0.061364625,0.3090342,0.038698718,0.0019684436,0.020356387,0.02076739,0.0019408157,0.15899953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7090423,0.00593853,0.27220494,0.00092669565,0.00029779592,0.0063537494,0.0038419114,0.00013711363,0.0012568751],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.44000632,0.43459776,0.041887566,0.011029825,0.06796208,0.0045164814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1460358,0.718133,0.041109007,0.021943461,0.06709166,0.0056870263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.46087405,0.0022852188,0.0036911392,0.06993212,0.004282686,0.03251079,0.0043205875,0.004231043,0.007298524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63693506,0.0009948057,0.004491198,0.07737795,0.005785411,0.014800292,0.01381382,0.0029108743,0.0011471305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039130035,0.001354886,0.12895772,0.03206429,0.008349464,0.00047665407,0.013138996,0.05188225,0.002670664,0.17703666,0.012988715,0.5671667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002244409,0.0058476203,0.12034841,0.028384075,0.010257193,0.00041506923,0.057174373,0.16328703,0.015244765,0.48847708,0.10753013,0.0007898745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013840141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015925579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027921507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028982587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6648383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401109185","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00319","title":"Researcher profile system adoption and use across discipline and rank: A case study at the University of Manitoba","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Sociology; Regional science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4144187244737644,"score_gpt":0.5513445988952799,"score_spread":0.1369258744215155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401109185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911082,0.00033804547,0.0004249136,0.0028923731,0.000029648321,0.0001915853,0.00014708658,0.000027716724,0.004840415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099416,0.0007248411,0.0017651179,0.00090373337,0.000016481366,0.00014486456,0.00010765676,0.000031060372,0.0053120223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866275,0.0060996246,0.00053786376,0.000756582,0.003506849,0.0024716065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415161,0.01579529,0.0056357803,0.0025473,0.02258181,0.011923701],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016750004,0.00031928884,0.00054580887,0.004450055,0.014468752,0.0074561564,0.0023468505,0.0009000933,0.0028481581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031230915,0.00061275484,0.00033504207,0.008881893,0.003695703,0.0018095158,0.00461815,0.0015313319,0.0005997996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021378818,0.0009189493,0.587033,0.0003764623,0.00006088008,0.0025592681,0.3236181,0.00031604103,0.002672537,0.002742563,0.00404682,0.075441554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023953133,0.00035326424,0.31973922,0.0003511128,0.000046672987,0.0004257082,0.65803164,0.0007119622,0.0010270302,0.0002710124,0.018934665,0.000083666855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76152056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8971714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03712526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07553979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47976774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402586478","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00331","title":"We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Simon Fraser University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Diamond; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Library science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.9189744428884732,"score_gpt":0.7656385779657428,"score_spread":0.15333586492273044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402586478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04365629,0.018292302,0.25778192,0.63187987,0.0145392,0.0014140644,0.0012060292,0.0004095879,0.03082076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58832175,0.008909515,0.32435575,0.061262593,0.008526486,0.0027731257,0.0007493128,0.00047856104,0.0046229493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6735275,0.236612,0.03528003,0.01197632,0.039266486,0.0033376731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24019599,0.5948009,0.04690866,0.037817314,0.07489516,0.005382027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33761784,0.0012801735,0.0040634884,0.024883995,0.0077761123,0.04179133,0.0066552893,0.0052747373,0.005411056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65467495,0.0009664283,0.001796422,0.026380317,0.033088908,0.04509382,0.012373081,0.015375792,0.0019949907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109905326,0.00012569167,0.02488891,0.002112089,0.0003078097,0.00017016448,0.021474093,0.0012230468,0.0006927053,0.8429436,0.027934432,0.07801757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008886903,0.00009556712,0.011848305,0.004922263,0.00011322779,0.0002415259,0.0262484,0.004505936,0.0011550954,0.8652681,0.085241914,0.000270683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013032948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011265054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015442203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81683517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405991561","doi":"10.1162/qss_c_00347","title":"On the limits of causal theory for studying inequalities in science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Popularity; Gateway (web page); Explanatory power; Inequality; Causal model; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.13904796341852127,"score_gpt":0.42336716415435566,"score_spread":0.2843192007358344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405991561","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037623603,0.03048844,0.44666636,0.32494175,0.0039867773,0.00009395492,0.00037474206,0.0002573183,0.15556705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92257315,0.0077273324,0.047706835,0.012500513,0.0042290124,0.00031928622,0.000082066996,0.00015412515,0.0047076223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95961535,0.03362886,0.0008794397,0.0014444634,0.0038128616,0.0006189921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66688925,0.31303984,0.0045480863,0.008538648,0.0054439353,0.0015402477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055371303,0.0007137161,0.0018113737,0.0034639009,0.0029283045,0.0066156657,0.003132713,0.004062915,0.0091680195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15252133,0.00047068394,0.0010590163,0.0026003479,0.02839285,0.015384146,0.007373695,0.010350543,0.0006219954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004441649,0.000004280414,0.00009627365,0.000031626896,0.0000063424486,0.000018333976,0.000092415736,0.000468978,0.00001048459,0.997612,0.0005248451,0.0011299298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031450386,0.0000030937085,0.000045750465,0.000050195908,0.0000023429297,0.000008271609,0.00004114027,0.0023177185,0.000012689685,0.99637324,0.0011390029,0.000003301632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034201206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022827445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046356767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026151042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29283494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410299443","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.1","title":"Examining the geographic and linguistic coverage of gold and diamond open access journals in OpenAlex, Scopus, and Web of Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; Université de Montréal; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Scopus; Web of science; World Wide Web; Diamond; Data science; Computer science; Geography; Political science; MEDLINE; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.16923264423151593,"score_gpt":0.444099002351288,"score_spread":0.2748663581197721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410299443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779417,0.0018098296,0.000436077,0.0011077729,0.000023863517,0.000028123917,0.00439017,0.000024407325,0.014238026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659675,0.00044052364,0.00029191293,0.000077559445,0.000026306938,0.000019118801,0.0017344409,0.000014552975,0.0007989517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924602,0.0018442333,0.0014147889,0.0008860973,0.002753666,0.0006410771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81293106,0.09093975,0.0651848,0.003956657,0.022555657,0.004432061],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006639631,0.00017903633,0.00047393495,0.017893815,0.00082191866,0.0042580795,0.00083175127,0.0003890336,0.00518534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08774367,0.00011971428,0.00028665588,0.025107695,0.0014170422,0.0035009107,0.0034799601,0.00048265074,0.0008783069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013825351,0.000054150303,0.9602818,0.00072570343,0.00016870642,0.00019028614,0.009874707,0.00023692878,0.00050673145,0.005532844,0.0022283257,0.020061523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010142137,0.00006639806,0.9665527,0.00041381476,0.00008340463,0.00028402463,0.022432415,0.0005127952,0.00048267888,0.001516189,0.0076216455,0.000023831672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121377325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012369435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012201879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012670542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03511411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410612411","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.5","title":"Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Villum Fonden","keywords":"Gender bias; Inequality; Grant funding; Gender disparity; Gender inequality; Implicit bias; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.8238363909286305,"score_gpt":0.67728162911672,"score_spread":0.14655476181191052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410612411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87634635,0.00202838,0.077870406,0.013749682,0.0009666243,0.00251007,0.0015563397,0.00022242959,0.024749689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896259,0.000075219796,0.0063809333,0.0012893864,0.0001309529,0.0010787046,0.0001248986,0.000025521636,0.0012685827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.49268484,0.4556498,0.008986243,0.018071657,0.01804296,0.006564474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28147236,0.5964705,0.055244755,0.052584592,0.010898451,0.003329384],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3550921,0.00055339094,0.0023165916,0.0014546708,0.003653606,0.0044361125,0.0032474971,0.0041699847,0.009734674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.55534226,0.0006793866,0.0017539606,0.0021440634,0.009801284,0.005308236,0.0066097453,0.0035140407,0.0011691588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038519807,0.0041941013,0.43668258,0.0027806563,0.005080744,0.0021275966,0.0316339,0.0066469708,0.0037120613,0.3145083,0.023768239,0.13034502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008987158,0.011490176,0.43267724,0.0023148223,0.003613857,0.0013735164,0.021003239,0.052678257,0.01238758,0.3972973,0.055368654,0.00080818974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070226574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065279645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99854535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029981423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79528624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401998","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.12","title":"Guidance for the reporting of bibliometric analyses: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa; Communications Research Centre Canada; University of Toronto; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Mitacs; Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine","keywords":"Data science; Management science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.9677277945080556,"score_gpt":0.8158772839024488,"score_spread":0.15185051060560673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412401998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047877156,0.11693745,0.38036534,0.18216765,0.020643137,0.25425354,0.011046478,0.0045184423,0.025280165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009260304,0.056039296,0.7129054,0.008542178,0.0018261212,0.20540448,0.0035989026,0.0004653441,0.0019579954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.21953294,0.44823158,0.26887435,0.0056093177,0.05513271,0.0026191643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08649274,0.4732649,0.097954266,0.043498922,0.2938729,0.00491633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6949477,0.0045909537,0.011432288,0.08898525,0.008265705,0.022946624,0.011624368,0.014555935,0.00818345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82461077,0.006735824,0.013147718,0.073248334,0.009396997,0.018854756,0.013646555,0.015031272,0.008637704],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053078646,0.0002864274,0.0024073648,0.2824109,0.0014421319,0.00075343373,0.014586047,0.0016871184,0.003019974,0.024758419,0.19210234,0.47601506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574507,0.00031553354,0.0032481207,0.56537867,0.001586169,0.0004657324,0.004617065,0.0026947353,0.0018513713,0.022506574,0.39631778,0.00046083875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009002387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011476325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91101474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02079134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13178313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3761838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413008886","doi":"10.1162/qss.a.17","title":"On the open road to universal indexing: OpenAlex and Open Journal Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantitative Science Studies","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.8496207791303315,"score_gpt":0.7015085151665741,"score_spread":0.14811226396375743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413008886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79963005,0.0049306117,0.0360608,0.026351172,0.00018557603,0.00013954173,0.0006832142,0.0002130846,0.13180596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957137,0.0004029891,0.0025499018,0.00029136488,0.000065331136,0.000030238309,0.00010225938,0.000033059994,0.0008111303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95265573,0.023341991,0.0036166143,0.00453329,0.0114786085,0.004373794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7928424,0.1259704,0.031103963,0.026366957,0.013412115,0.010304179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048763223,0.0002969302,0.0010679135,0.012389378,0.00592988,0.019602912,0.001839982,0.0013533662,0.010143804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15052754,0.00042354505,0.00047043097,0.018434936,0.024943298,0.027306935,0.024729412,0.0021206925,0.0007183631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014033054,0.000114258546,0.102806,0.00044696755,0.0000793385,0.00019769273,0.034760144,0.000708705,0.00062897,0.7724415,0.0024516003,0.08522444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059052087,0.00013927721,0.11821001,0.0009221953,0.000081172,0.0005416782,0.061630927,0.0032136801,0.0014124243,0.74084735,0.07283568,0.0001065928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004399975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004186812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00717355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074824044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25788772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}