{"meta":{"query_hash":"9c6985a76abf","filters":{"venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9c6985a76abf","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quarterly+Journal+of+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1560923170","doi":"10.1561/100.00014068","title":"Useless Prevention vs. Costly Remediation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Principal (computer security); Agency (philosophy); Limiting; Principal–agent problem; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Business; Action (physics); Computer security; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Public economics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.02755806154075937,"score_gpt":0.2759911320413803,"score_spread":0.24843307050062094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560923170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964552,0.000057574638,0.000107792795,0.0024301473,0.00036514457,0.00007142751,0.0000022674096,0.00001384858,0.00049659284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883634,0.000004317309,0.0003773259,0.00012433725,0.0005541531,9.196009e-7,0.0000013303303,3.6416432e-7,0.000100891986],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979206,0.00008496191,0.00036912074,0.00016427218,0.0009208481,0.0005402505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817425,0.00010760151,0.00021256662,0.000039397364,0.0006364274,0.0008297688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012567204,0.00009423911,0.00015935929,0.000026201014,0.00016023529,0.00012689657,0.0005142116,0.000054315035,0.000034159602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030121062,0.00002930391,0.00008520868,0.0005767538,0.0003333116,0.0007915061,0.000022376422,0.00015479176,0.000041244934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025764704,0.00073012133,0.055033177,0.0000112647185,0.000018226749,0.000068880596,0.0016023632,0.00003106723,0.46045163,0.1923214,0.0034661437,0.28600806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005137085,0.007374255,0.93235475,0.00007565379,0.00003051602,0.00035867386,0.0061182356,0.00017887318,0.01166349,0.03854059,0.0024665466,0.0003247158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118384974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006390274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87732154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015548278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001234671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12324165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971925418","doi":"10.1561/100.00000007","title":"Context-dependent Voting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Context (archaeology); Disapproval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematical economics; Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019126454297515503,"score_gpt":0.330286125685098,"score_spread":0.3111596713875825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971925418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94914645,0.00011097416,0.001165712,0.0043967855,0.0010802075,0.00007946793,0.0000032719586,0.000020317646,0.043996826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728525,0.000001396132,0.00034887472,0.0005846158,0.0014777011,6.8747835e-7,8.642214e-8,0.0000041315816,0.0002972837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655414,0.00012443848,0.00051074714,0.00013854976,0.0014586524,0.0012134573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804854,0.00031803118,0.00018454339,0.00011641067,0.00053445227,0.0007980299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032664011,0.0000875913,0.00019321697,0.00016816698,0.00052098744,0.00023438939,0.000677324,0.00005980219,0.0001469128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073496834,0.0000717696,0.00011315853,0.00036261373,0.0019239013,0.00076385005,0.000013523578,0.00022948164,0.00007414664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026170057,0.000039296974,0.0041102907,0.0000024937433,0.000002483794,0.000027573727,0.0017804088,0.0000023528787,0.00044352302,0.9887666,0.00018193464,0.0046404037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023364841,0.003156394,0.12430347,0.0003607737,0.00017646844,0.00046488992,0.10941954,0.00026557964,0.007766529,0.64430296,0.10612835,0.0013185351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006226813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005535312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34446362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032658136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012343463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.941312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987917715","doi":"10.1561/100.00009022","title":"A Measure of Bizarreness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Path (computing); Population; Mathematics; Compact space; Convexity; Shortest path problem; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining; Demography; Pure mathematics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022831656264808913,"score_gpt":0.2504695862198519,"score_spread":0.22763792995504298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987917715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868408,0.00005060594,0.0026197247,0.0003779789,0.0012022412,0.000031152693,0.000009527664,0.000004222004,0.008863734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925435,2.461472e-7,0.0004521635,0.000037302565,0.00020580894,3.709345e-7,4.551844e-8,0.0000042083325,0.00004550379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864745,0.000018610166,0.0006897671,0.00012782254,0.0001172258,0.00039910592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00008750444,0.00044861122,0.00018544226,0.00018401367,0.00030177794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038009982,0.000067105386,0.0002876147,0.00024545545,0.00006511991,0.00005142814,0.0005252483,0.000049009515,0.00011450437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005437386,0.00005809884,0.00010010093,0.00032214925,0.0005593157,0.00032165722,0.00001074483,0.00023151355,0.000054079475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000622258,0.000046517445,0.011538237,0.000009811209,0.000004500802,0.0000023400437,0.00035968225,6.633009e-7,0.007892594,0.97949713,0.0000088782535,0.0006334069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008814031,0.0014723332,0.16193514,0.00011391764,0.000012447054,0.00042211887,0.0011110136,0.0004024167,0.009077874,0.8228456,0.0013966686,0.00032907378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008178015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006088725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15665154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031066487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010551739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23692021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993402131","doi":"10.1561/100.00000011","title":"Ethical Voters and Costly Information Acquisition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Information aggregation; Contrast (vision); Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Political science; Information system; Psychology; Information retrieval; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01458292255679964,"score_gpt":0.3343702406724275,"score_spread":0.3197873181156278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993402131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97017324,0.000013882828,0.0028642712,0.017379263,0.0003126603,0.00008359775,0.0000026762677,0.000014810518,0.009155588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985217,4.269277e-7,0.00024014685,0.00075669267,0.00045137867,9.785963e-7,4.7924266e-7,0.0000017685215,0.000026446878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788374,0.00017482656,0.00043171842,0.00007446157,0.0008102361,0.00062503124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998645,0.0001862717,0.0001434622,0.000056892255,0.00044305416,0.00052532693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002486195,0.000062039115,0.00012420914,0.00013590141,0.00038115677,0.0002880731,0.00016197428,0.00010939686,0.00003956311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033233518,0.00005045783,0.000041179494,0.00030107214,0.0011539962,0.0013177122,0.000007189737,0.00023474774,0.000022103583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074632485,0.000014997562,0.0029241906,0.000004714889,0.0000010679465,0.0000016894336,0.0007479012,0.0000011518783,0.00071072637,0.99367344,0.00020943818,0.0017031996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000785243,0.0016108383,0.54789877,0.00011338664,0.000041230578,0.000077531324,0.0035127983,0.00039025795,0.0008618219,0.43533415,0.009040685,0.00033326968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007518896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030039367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5583393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024761749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033991932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045946907","doi":"10.1561/100.00007024","title":"A Theory of Policy Expertise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05331897072260033,"score_gpt":0.37947485673776177,"score_spread":0.32615588601516143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045946907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808283,0.000047581747,0.0012317608,0.003358654,0.00022856807,0.000065698194,0.0000018690274,0.000009301282,0.0142283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872816,0.000002200466,0.00017787924,0.0001881972,0.0006755663,0.0000011329157,4.30079e-8,0.0000037445077,0.00022310489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726516,0.00030214913,0.00052308035,0.00010366759,0.0009615916,0.0008443713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997916,0.00033485386,0.00019727678,0.000121019315,0.0005440704,0.00088680716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203145,0.000072031406,0.0002173307,0.00022672932,0.00036788645,0.0000316177,0.00041892234,0.000053604803,0.0000936984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018808319,0.00005500378,0.00010780456,0.0006860266,0.0029240751,0.0005137142,0.000010244803,0.00012208942,0.00001709246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140714055,0.00006786761,0.0028833344,0.0000037614989,0.0000034385516,0.00000979083,0.009130613,4.063076e-7,0.003222736,0.9824031,0.0000560956,0.0022047893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010180234,0.0039393893,0.24773255,0.000195163,0.00004279603,0.00029257254,0.014230825,0.00006635666,0.010935832,0.71865654,0.0024208545,0.00046910564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005945278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011302725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26374656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003502087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00196304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120374824","doi":"10.1561/100.00000015","title":"Self-Interest, Inequality, and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Egalitarianism; Reservation; Economics; Value (mathematics); Inequity aversion; Test (biology); Inequality; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Politics; Law; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.02709649023627371,"score_gpt":0.37059553503410636,"score_spread":0.34349904479783266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120374824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886862,0.00009629265,0.00014336433,0.0012789918,0.00030655644,0.00007281699,0.0000018812351,0.0000076721,0.009406217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950556,0.0000044446097,0.004686872,0.00007085909,0.00016688753,0.0000011420365,4.4513783e-8,0.000003139283,0.0000110197225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983172,0.00007126939,0.0004821497,0.00015690942,0.00039126453,0.000581227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928844,0.0001890826,0.00012403884,0.00007587339,0.00010527665,0.00021730574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019541043,0.00007695791,0.00017206675,0.00019720517,0.00026946364,0.00020450799,0.0003310287,0.000032821983,0.000051474915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011850722,0.00006837353,0.00004253107,0.00023405458,0.00071927515,0.0005755629,0.000054658216,0.00012299127,0.000008653391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007681146,0.00013855618,0.065241255,0.0000028923102,0.0000022247707,0.000029029701,0.0035066227,3.6434966e-7,0.0003957063,0.927546,0.000041033516,0.0030886356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009727335,0.0010173287,0.3868059,0.00024354848,0.00002522734,0.000052017593,0.044475585,0.000093864764,0.00044990698,0.5641511,0.0013167897,0.00039597647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035348358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005861801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36339486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006622439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022357312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5343638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201179406","doi":"10.1561/100.00000003","title":"Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Policy making; Political science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.015319184275428928,"score_gpt":0.3551301761856814,"score_spread":0.33981099191025244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201179406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881258,0.00001888162,0.00026458557,0.008446296,0.00013459669,0.000087475106,0.000002645248,0.0000071568647,0.0029125328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872607,2.2182675e-7,0.00013941758,0.00038981036,0.0007181189,0.0000018011542,1.4737502e-7,0.000002320605,0.000022066552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801666,0.00011364178,0.00042894707,0.00008486463,0.0005933876,0.0007625195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898916,0.00018205382,0.00012179785,0.000062770676,0.00019716124,0.000447023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014707075,0.0000664738,0.00014003318,0.00035062272,0.00026137565,0.00028132458,0.00021567168,0.00004833611,0.000009271254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092927506,0.000058235364,0.000029278992,0.0007110891,0.00036822906,0.0012196834,0.000013233527,0.000129392,0.00001796871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060271504,0.000025370153,0.078434005,0.00000759101,8.75949e-7,0.000002461115,0.0045048175,0.000017596387,0.0005135134,0.91330975,0.000054575885,0.0031234385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023176656,0.00045345118,0.94628286,0.00011823167,0.0000058292526,0.000011126924,0.0016717992,0.00009661644,0.0001542661,0.043416075,0.007419494,0.00013845203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052762214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073420643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86989367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003505645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043673802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616129321","doi":"10.1561/100.00016120","title":"Durable Policy, Political Accountability, and Active Waste","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Accountability; Politics; Distortion (music); Economics; Government (linguistics); Language change; Investment (military); Public economics; Public policy; Political economy; Public administration; Microeconomics; Political science; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0344346516445685,"score_gpt":0.2887721324234711,"score_spread":0.2543374807789026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616129321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.866556,0.00003260158,0.00013221479,0.011740533,0.00025773834,0.000063069674,0.000038054477,0.0000062622394,0.12117352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981979,0.0000021667324,0.00017197392,0.0007067818,0.0008330315,0.0000014377716,1.7101655e-7,0.000010049646,0.00007645414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974612,0.000016785809,0.00077576214,0.00034307886,0.00011366378,0.0012894928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976722,0.0001231546,0.00053105276,0.00047683204,0.000105438994,0.0010913002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014930147,0.00015872724,0.00048392764,0.0003500467,0.0006089372,0.0006332308,0.0009831622,0.00009095737,0.00005564315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010406441,0.00014943413,0.00012987739,0.00011355323,0.0022088587,0.0020266494,0.00012012207,0.0003041344,0.000102535705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018242716,0.000053736032,0.017751453,0.000011242816,0.000010704068,0.000004386872,0.00031201998,1.8024325e-7,0.00008513588,0.98102504,0.00006877574,0.00065906165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042570994,0.00037663104,0.2915166,0.000016409249,0.000004861332,0.00011835591,0.0007938653,0.00023674453,0.00041605873,0.705663,0.0002743514,0.0001573559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023957696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002882069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.275362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004652323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023816757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8138632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620746154","doi":"10.1561/100.00017008","title":"When Can Citizen Communication Hinder Successful Revolution?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations; Political economy; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.03311839781464777,"score_gpt":0.36839993212436384,"score_spread":0.3352815343097161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620746154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8454923,0.00007840344,0.00032548545,0.06984639,0.000943277,0.00012952603,0.000009265918,0.00001889756,0.08315645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972308,0.000018265217,0.0011122779,0.0007254175,0.000579931,0.0000016106301,2.8374978e-7,0.00000460244,0.0003268022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705935,0.00021456994,0.0004423768,0.00014218631,0.0011617194,0.0009798043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967919,0.00025738782,0.0004472866,0.0006029923,0.00082779187,0.0010726416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003593199,0.00009378192,0.00019717395,0.00013798845,0.0025572896,0.00070157193,0.0024875097,0.00008223304,0.00016908781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024214608,0.000079454054,0.000087387445,0.000119546174,0.004947449,0.001507739,0.00005409711,0.00031504795,0.000036083846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039763363,0.00002953118,0.016408237,0.000003862884,0.0000044791022,0.000008654961,0.009015714,2.1800132e-7,0.00011756946,0.9714512,0.000997279,0.0019592568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005036951,0.0003949856,0.19510303,0.00016230656,0.00004197019,0.000047911493,0.020482259,0.000033640434,0.0002278788,0.7705095,0.012211852,0.00028096983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012396444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018127827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20094171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005083163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017701642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754471702","doi":"10.1561/100.00017133","title":"Uncontested Primaries: Causes and Consequences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Barriers to entry; Competition (biology); Competence (human resources); Perfect information; Economics; Observability; Business; Political economy; Microeconomics; Monopoly","score_opus":0.043984803486823515,"score_gpt":0.3766775145055533,"score_spread":0.33269271101872977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754471702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859616,0.00004871781,0.00027334256,0.007858819,0.00043363756,0.00007102187,0.0000016034562,0.000014066907,0.005337145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985871,0.0000011439589,0.00021460687,0.00038544362,0.00073349115,8.8423695e-7,3.8256676e-8,0.000002705655,0.000074595635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978901,0.00018106631,0.00036915994,0.00013016594,0.0006447758,0.0007846962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785,0.00027482957,0.00013844253,0.000079715275,0.00078701176,0.0008700188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019716038,0.00007283609,0.00016923081,0.00010554394,0.0005884515,0.0002516546,0.00025863943,0.000048581016,0.00006847042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013948735,0.000054178432,0.000033659908,0.00038989796,0.008350702,0.0006814808,0.0000108733575,0.00010674271,0.000019664854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008505211,0.00002016713,0.010733205,0.000004256057,0.0000036173126,0.0000059634153,0.004142699,1.9590589e-8,0.003549975,0.98029464,0.00004950883,0.0011874518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009922966,0.008716981,0.28765428,0.00037920979,0.000093003764,0.0002456404,0.022026384,0.000077967416,0.007881571,0.6560528,0.0152357435,0.00064408686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008173149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025279166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32424182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018194085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010707739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889324902","doi":"10.1561/100.00017161","title":"Are Americans Stuck in Uncompetitive Enclaves? An Appraisal of U.S. Electoral Competition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Uncompetitive inhibitor; Political science; Public economics; Positive economics; Physics","score_opus":0.04539026716107978,"score_gpt":0.40989455349163173,"score_spread":0.36450428633055193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889324902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936439,0.000008928607,0.0008750836,0.0012877642,0.00044662724,0.00009625103,0.000006691509,0.000009783401,0.0036249885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986766,3.6206296e-7,0.00034123965,0.00014134379,0.00081803213,0.0000017542934,3.7210978e-7,0.0000052076643,0.00001506999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675596,0.00048653083,0.00063532335,0.00018877558,0.0009817239,0.0009516907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974246,0.00030308345,0.0004650426,0.00012880615,0.0009253893,0.00075308204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020852936,0.00010453769,0.00032011484,0.00025722865,0.000234358,0.00008513527,0.00045175987,0.000064999236,0.00013690868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008639923,0.00008923244,0.0000701844,0.00097418367,0.003529964,0.0008266255,0.000011734241,0.00020331543,0.000016554934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070157,0.00021520657,0.12146444,0.000007173224,0.0000037384436,0.000008152654,0.0037786323,0.0000013010022,0.004722565,0.86893535,0.000015001058,0.0008177703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004295514,0.0041724443,0.9499732,0.00016959458,0.000016349371,0.000013648852,0.011324767,0.00016384953,0.0020713944,0.030977704,0.00047703303,0.00021045422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01378624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014376673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037116418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118743956","doi":"10.1561/100.00019123","title":"A Model of Interest Group Influence and Campaign Advertising","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interest group; Advertising; Political science; Group (periodic table); Business; Politics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.03846102189926111,"score_gpt":0.26116863345879593,"score_spread":0.22270761155953483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118743956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912591,0.00003286716,0.0067370636,0.00084251846,0.00008818032,0.000021943355,7.531843e-7,0.00000579342,0.0010117994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980476,0.0000012008212,0.001015779,0.0007933248,0.000119586235,2.4757384e-7,1.5359052e-7,0.0000033897225,0.000018715424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895865,0.000008715301,0.0003516271,0.00012529452,0.00027195833,0.0002837352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988995,0.000039060273,0.00031386636,0.00009575437,0.0005850654,0.00006675928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005365818,0.00006983909,0.00014837203,0.0001519692,0.000089176894,0.00020078276,0.00020538348,0.000019649848,0.00002163289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003393494,0.000057500485,0.00004008907,0.00044179792,0.00038760697,0.0017229891,0.000047383015,0.000111392685,0.0000051725056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013554044,0.00006276707,0.0079905605,0.000056640325,0.000003184485,0.00002320491,0.0001375784,0.000077140736,0.12558816,0.8607264,0.0000238906,0.0052968934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017556554,0.00037885766,0.36943668,0.0010815582,0.00009672076,0.00030481652,0.006038806,0.13559872,0.007876873,0.47634745,0.00045322016,0.00063066644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064345426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045721623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.384379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003153699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012963804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23448017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121756914","doi":"10.1561/100.00012036","title":"The Political Economy of the Subprime Mortgage Credit Expansion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mortgage insurance; Collateralized mortgage obligation; Secondary mortgage market; Mortgage underwriting; Government (linguistics); Business; Financial system; Subprime mortgage crisis; Shared appreciation mortgage; Legislation; Economics; Finance; Financial crisis; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016421854637156806,"score_gpt":0.22505473271762247,"score_spread":0.20863287808046566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121756914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85262835,0.00006805943,0.00051604543,0.015275646,0.0010915357,0.00013025136,0.000007485091,0.0000059599033,0.13027667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.0000037748289,0.0001939728,0.00061236974,0.00030135814,0.000002482099,9.722891e-8,0.000009346836,0.00007490946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766,0.000035994173,0.0010592719,0.0001977311,0.00010369615,0.00094332214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981221,0.0003017264,0.0005159742,0.000413814,0.00017514292,0.00047123161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017697999,0.00012036546,0.00032253814,0.00013109912,0.00033275844,0.00027194168,0.0010920587,0.000063095584,0.00015342324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036853296,0.000076751145,0.00021552017,0.00023031572,0.001371312,0.0007122246,0.000067515095,0.00027464522,0.00013668323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044826834,0.000037135876,0.008153217,0.0000047904123,0.0000074547943,7.354696e-7,0.000115714305,0.0000012108054,0.00013537503,0.990092,0.00029277877,0.0011551353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027833824,0.0003056711,0.1076043,0.000020746314,0.0000072228436,0.00005390443,0.0010271007,0.0014909524,0.00072817405,0.8858144,0.002519006,0.00015012658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033701013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000103367765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14617334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027381512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024294562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5052656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122048872","doi":"10.1561/100.00013110","title":"Ingroup Bias in Official Behavior: A National Field Experiment in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; China; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05852627036750019,"score_gpt":0.4227106774956094,"score_spread":0.36418440712810923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122048872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686634,0.000015103365,0.000415459,0.0036599769,0.00032492343,0.000090486625,7.462255e-7,0.000004588725,0.026825305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.0000019421523,0.00017392747,0.00018590393,0.00029774493,0.0000042716542,1.2798276e-7,0.000002331611,0.000071824616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670345,0.0002751463,0.00041950506,0.00014707439,0.0018142699,0.00064054667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887,0.00029421903,0.000093436625,0.00006536483,0.00029410905,0.00038285102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00545339,0.00006353952,0.00014190796,0.0005914968,0.00022622923,0.00022552682,0.00052551815,0.000055888337,0.00017538083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026255266,0.000056943576,0.00005638382,0.0006826644,0.0006658218,0.0006380273,0.00002503099,0.0002578729,0.00001097731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015251938,0.0003864949,0.062070534,0.0000038621806,7.6035906e-7,0.00001752278,0.006843025,0.000003754376,0.00054907025,0.9236477,0.00011176624,0.0063502453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007808242,0.0009254198,0.90026003,0.00005678127,0.00000427138,0.000011400966,0.009551906,0.00034244446,0.0005191112,0.08693792,0.00044185502,0.00016802594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006519808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042261574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056438695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010158818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124581438","doi":"10.1561/100.00005004","title":"Bicameralism and Government Formation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Stability (learning theory); Economics; Political economy; Affect (linguistics); Economic system; Durability; Politics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02097902358189409,"score_gpt":0.23964930716696264,"score_spread":0.21867028358506854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124581438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95552987,0.00007638616,0.009236493,0.0026639272,0.00025580637,0.000032848737,0.000010787402,0.0000037020502,0.032190207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982867,0.0000017835882,0.00076380593,0.00072732655,0.00019291497,2.1928747e-7,7.565708e-8,0.000003085166,0.000024044348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998706,0.0000043095392,0.00060547114,0.00011270443,0.00008441485,0.00048714608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.000058023412,0.00026128005,0.00008402712,0.000026219019,0.00039133575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051994,0.00006228618,0.00016988658,0.00012720183,0.00008893676,0.00008403107,0.00019114748,0.000031987387,0.00002466352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011983289,0.000057971527,0.000047572023,0.00012865735,0.00031084698,0.00083188654,0.000015329386,0.000108025066,0.00004555606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071015215,0.000019781803,0.004392416,0.0000044179515,0.000002598727,0.000002993322,0.000377275,1.7604134e-7,0.00017462732,0.99297595,0.00006301075,0.0019796223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004108461,0.0005756205,0.36280686,0.00001258308,0.0000031577142,0.00016856742,0.0006823313,0.0005524345,0.00084050954,0.6321971,0.0016134729,0.00013651265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060059076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053726203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36077887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002500146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016728414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23640104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130607879","doi":"10.1561/100.00017112","title":"Optimal Size of Rebellions: Trade-off Between Large Group and Maintaining Secrecy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Group (periodic table); Political science; Economics; Political economy; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.019879182495718975,"score_gpt":0.3248332259415573,"score_spread":0.3049540434458383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130607879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804734,0.0003240298,0.0028492722,0.006841229,0.00021024043,0.00005894434,0.000029922348,0.000010729457,0.00920223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970789,0.000029043102,0.0018877088,0.00039090478,0.00046343703,5.482469e-7,2.5721732e-7,0.000005531585,0.00014368941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672973,0.00023506481,0.00056719384,0.00021512256,0.0010641598,0.0011887315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971235,0.0011492869,0.00021838146,0.0001414306,0.00024389414,0.0011235565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029186727,0.000112009715,0.0003425325,0.00007999332,0.0004129338,0.00014400855,0.0004592537,0.00008869844,0.00012367005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022972357,0.000098796,0.00011848112,0.00059188245,0.002354476,0.00067616906,0.00004526751,0.0003187278,0.0000030237977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074264753,0.000056796165,0.0068927286,0.0000075611742,0.00000902255,0.00004348332,0.003668632,1.8990639e-7,0.0008704362,0.98549557,0.000016907434,0.0029312659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001935088,0.002401846,0.7018065,0.00046057728,0.00015493477,0.00021964293,0.0547073,0.00012651975,0.0033611793,0.20255667,0.031619776,0.0006500053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031705637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008351369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016504245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000983623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86751646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409438190","doi":"10.1561/100.00023042","title":"Pivots or Partisans? Proposal-Making Strategy and Status Quo Selection in Congress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03483824254322848,"score_gpt":0.40829030700670305,"score_spread":0.37345206446347456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409438190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889393,0.000052343803,0.00045338753,0.0030504982,0.0003681418,0.00016564534,0.0000015407899,0.000013054834,0.0069560977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925077,0.0000023901482,0.00015399727,0.00012999972,0.00015417844,0.0000035909468,6.053587e-8,0.000002843713,0.00030218967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974093,0.00030806495,0.0005087615,0.00017096804,0.00052809826,0.001074838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987365,0.00028815598,0.00012718425,0.000051467116,0.00032058323,0.00047611134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019345712,0.00008759516,0.00020891744,0.00024493696,0.0003373248,0.00029411208,0.00018489249,0.00007228587,0.00005048499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078730803,0.00006515796,0.000031249805,0.00093960966,0.000992377,0.0007257024,0.0000105984045,0.00021612326,0.0000033872598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037942315,0.00005797502,0.05147517,0.00001875911,0.0000037607442,0.000010823249,0.001250756,0.000005124705,0.0010191338,0.9405124,0.000045700515,0.005562419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012088378,0.0029043958,0.73319906,0.00073431607,0.0000511035,0.00004373151,0.01214485,0.0014987848,0.0010072348,0.24382158,0.0029913448,0.0003947764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006968232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014807786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69669086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045286145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020222282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}