{"meta":{"query_hash":"9c6985a76abf","filters":{"venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9c6985a76abf","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quarterly+Journal+of+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1560923170","doi":"10.1561/100.00014068","title":"Useless Prevention vs. Costly Remediation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Principal (computer security); Agency (philosophy); Limiting; Principal–agent problem; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Business; Action (physics); Computer security; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Public economics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.02755806154075937,"score_gpt":0.2759911320413803,"score_spread":0.24843307050062094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560923170","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19728297,0.0023569292,0.5853105,0.02310739,0.00053977786,0.00069814984,0.0014265658,0.00048958015,0.18878815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95696163,0.000942087,0.019334102,0.0006541584,0.00022971226,0.00030957093,0.00010552649,0.000062875166,0.021400403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968811,0.001336969,0.000113148584,0.0005117636,0.00039016313,0.0007668471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991273,0.0044730324,0.0018220955,0.0011643776,0.00044214848,0.00082539563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002598249,0.0014495999,0.0014444359,0.0010116132,0.0013748909,0.0031928364,0.0029475875,0.0050923214,0.018376794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013608828,0.0007903746,0.0014579743,0.00086164626,0.0054870024,0.004938049,0.0028808743,0.0033812756,0.0012150898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021768964,0.00021912999,0.0013877463,0.00019517147,0.00007021082,0.00026153793,0.00025433756,0.12802067,0.00094153796,0.85204864,0.0029990661,0.013384345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031098488,0.00042088315,0.0012296543,0.00011761608,0.000121727695,0.0002577698,0.00030932258,0.19180392,0.0007559654,0.7902142,0.014385996,0.00007197437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003209757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035881891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018376794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022698294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025907748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06147653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971925418","doi":"10.1561/100.00000007","title":"Context-dependent Voting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Context (archaeology); Disapproval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematical economics; Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019126454297515503,"score_gpt":0.330286125685098,"score_spread":0.3111596713875825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971925418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5804529,0.0046242354,0.273011,0.0050534797,0.00039752337,0.0003169538,0.0006772148,0.0001735593,0.13529313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98999,0.0004575471,0.0064253593,0.00030850343,0.0000983311,0.000060091515,0.000104539635,0.000011369307,0.0025442154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947178,0.0026580207,0.00017416463,0.0013500545,0.00075321575,0.00034678038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895118,0.0066402964,0.0012915619,0.0017061613,0.0005951741,0.000255007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003703373,0.00033248664,0.0009205508,0.00087200647,0.001220754,0.0022526262,0.00088411424,0.0011081785,0.006892144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021752276,0.00030701747,0.00066932046,0.0014636647,0.0022566263,0.0025694305,0.0017273494,0.0019843085,0.00064516364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253377,0.00013553663,0.026326746,0.00022893051,0.0001453099,0.000261232,0.0011203116,0.018048437,0.0017507916,0.86213076,0.0028183542,0.08670819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009511921,0.00021545812,0.023084661,0.000065925626,0.00011773423,0.00041427632,0.00066416996,0.08865113,0.0021467176,0.8524677,0.0319997,0.00007732754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023582892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032121576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006892144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013876455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063065684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023056507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987917715","doi":"10.1561/100.00009022","title":"A Measure of Bizarreness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Path (computing); Population; Mathematics; Compact space; Convexity; Shortest path problem; Statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Data mining; Demography; Pure mathematics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022831656264808913,"score_gpt":0.2504695862198519,"score_spread":0.22763792995504298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987917715","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15647769,0.001562634,0.79076916,0.001861619,0.00016595957,0.00018082386,0.001567266,0.00038984872,0.04702502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83970153,0.001090118,0.15029885,0.00036080697,0.0003613955,0.0005654179,0.0012199403,0.00023983432,0.0061621373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939551,0.0019248859,0.00055059826,0.0013050777,0.001786661,0.00047761458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726494,0.016197477,0.0034367254,0.003059145,0.00329397,0.0013632958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004466287,0.00082702446,0.0011458299,0.0060302345,0.0019594426,0.004472208,0.0016514143,0.001405674,0.0068435604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026605077,0.0005893183,0.0009767002,0.0042223153,0.005035356,0.0075746384,0.0028434477,0.0022702764,0.0010408562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098633944,0.000057129986,0.0057196966,0.00019898816,0.00012753133,0.00024694882,0.00073697424,0.019008348,0.004803559,0.9390166,0.0026716527,0.027314015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034561457,0.00026103805,0.010419339,0.00010083741,0.000077726654,0.0014565767,0.0005245352,0.073905624,0.0038455622,0.8834961,0.025768321,0.00010976363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059426326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004403785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068435604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015172823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076267536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023620248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993402131","doi":"10.1561/100.00000011","title":"Ethical Voters and Costly Information Acquisition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fraction (chemistry); Information aggregation; Contrast (vision); Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Political science; Information system; Psychology; Information retrieval; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01458292255679964,"score_gpt":0.3343702406724275,"score_spread":0.3197873181156278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993402131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85504556,0.000561132,0.0736867,0.0058827675,0.000043855372,0.00012392807,0.00008895238,0.000045818815,0.06452133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636275,0.00008792508,0.0019980352,0.0001590392,0.000022673883,0.000022498078,0.0000107026235,0.0000036773013,0.0013326213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162334,0.0058505544,0.00024324431,0.00051287113,0.00095867953,0.0008112012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961552,0.022811845,0.00844296,0.0045149755,0.0018164169,0.0008617795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00844223,0.000275123,0.0005776561,0.0010248378,0.00129228,0.002502355,0.0003828092,0.0014458203,0.004170488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033175837,0.0003847169,0.0004384646,0.0006945328,0.0029539804,0.003110556,0.0025752971,0.0016519208,0.00033746668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003708074,0.00027728206,0.032784898,0.00012188949,0.00008080195,0.00044563666,0.0019266765,0.0171615,0.002296077,0.89840734,0.0018097132,0.04431741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016217101,0.00023138674,0.015529826,0.00006365637,0.00004157812,0.0005359726,0.0011610473,0.04786867,0.0022626198,0.925372,0.006730606,0.00004048785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006191284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067014195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00844223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010067855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007820473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044647276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045946907","doi":"10.1561/100.00007024","title":"A Theory of Policy Expertise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05331897072260033,"score_gpt":0.37947485673776177,"score_spread":0.32615588601516143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045946907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013385853,0.0029932084,0.27392924,0.037631083,0.00037523554,0.00012382903,0.00034411685,0.00014104869,0.6710764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8664776,0.0035972062,0.05129909,0.005271615,0.0019273014,0.0004849393,0.0002669058,0.00010404365,0.07057118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958429,0.0020060549,0.00012529726,0.00065111194,0.00087531883,0.00049947057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355423,0.0044313795,0.00039402774,0.0006873559,0.00060415594,0.000328792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044313977,0.0005919746,0.00074940175,0.0024607026,0.0026278032,0.00492071,0.001733792,0.0042340173,0.025195552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123445615,0.0003875439,0.0010010327,0.0022334654,0.0101993205,0.0074877036,0.0035516347,0.0029995395,0.0032535505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016661533,0.0000034784814,0.000048041264,0.000013370763,0.0000025619108,0.000012258929,0.00011042732,0.0008219663,0.000017839358,0.99546105,0.0011764516,0.0023309875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070243814,0.000004112506,0.000055022098,0.000019113962,0.0000021542185,0.000021999425,0.00004980721,0.0018112827,0.000021323876,0.98417526,0.013830589,0.000002250581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021862544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011130833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025195552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003911742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030674168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084287465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120374824","doi":"10.1561/100.00000015","title":"Self-Interest, Inequality, and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North; Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Egalitarianism; Reservation; Economics; Value (mathematics); Inequity aversion; Test (biology); Inequality; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Politics; Law; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.02709649023627371,"score_gpt":0.37059553503410636,"score_spread":0.34349904479783266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120374824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99232084,0.00003630445,0.0019839148,0.00024202079,0.000007573547,0.000030587657,0.000012257398,0.000004809652,0.0053617014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897975,0.00001973176,0.0005884258,0.000053807402,0.0000054294746,0.0000319666,0.000011294844,0.0000018739996,0.00030756652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571854,0.0031835802,0.00013486826,0.0003029435,0.00036952758,0.00029061368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580164,0.031799957,0.00592722,0.002670987,0.00043391832,0.0011515759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130438395,0.0006025892,0.00057901954,0.00044947205,0.0006933662,0.0022326696,0.00080131623,0.0011704804,0.004510561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022868607,0.00030009745,0.00038189796,0.00035573408,0.0025705833,0.001572096,0.0015341173,0.0014557109,0.0003415846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023494381,0.022931091,0.25967485,0.0009664975,0.00092918746,0.000639137,0.015638398,0.09428259,0.043912865,0.44711992,0.0027400632,0.087671034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023115312,0.009890007,0.18013331,0.0001536953,0.00030775444,0.00028004774,0.005565355,0.22111982,0.012812524,0.5637471,0.0034788877,0.00019999094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005040481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005625857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130438395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010648135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044873607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0689832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201179406","doi":"10.1561/100.00000003","title":"Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Policy making; Political science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.015319184275428928,"score_gpt":0.3551301761856814,"score_spread":0.33981099191025244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201179406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42820805,0.0056973076,0.09834012,0.057511266,0.0003460989,0.00021073707,0.00071006117,0.0003047723,0.40867165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875802,0.00094775495,0.0052866875,0.00072055205,0.00015327918,0.000066211105,0.00008175747,0.000076366974,0.0050872006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899511,0.006970085,0.0002718257,0.000733255,0.00094259426,0.0011312751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95706874,0.03362056,0.0031654413,0.0020559502,0.0018077961,0.0022815217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014392687,0.0004394936,0.00081121165,0.0043160706,0.00411818,0.014926704,0.0012375973,0.0047527296,0.023783647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04497192,0.0007858067,0.0007650761,0.004290222,0.007473213,0.023176685,0.0053283474,0.003379918,0.0023926334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060033373,0.00020151837,0.018444499,0.00022108245,0.00008902782,0.00039271475,0.009040079,0.005221202,0.0005021006,0.87896943,0.005231709,0.08108631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016383025,0.00010255256,0.009061114,0.00032061143,0.00009686877,0.00023481164,0.011360502,0.0068844105,0.00069940346,0.9452544,0.025736082,0.00008548191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030598976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029972915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023783647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027526673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021914751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07956427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616129321","doi":"10.1561/100.00016120","title":"Durable Policy, Political Accountability, and Active Waste","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Accountability; Politics; Distortion (music); Economics; Government (linguistics); Language change; Investment (military); Public economics; Public policy; Political economy; Public administration; Microeconomics; Political science; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0344346516445685,"score_gpt":0.2887721324234711,"score_spread":0.2543374807789026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616129321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734362,0.0007354207,0.11831773,0.00989319,0.00008069906,0.00008346702,0.00035036192,0.00022263224,0.09688026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955735,0.000090645044,0.0014406339,0.00010103278,0.0000149268435,0.000016667382,0.000023285345,0.0000155893,0.0027236247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764663,0.0008676638,0.00011962775,0.00036466226,0.00031916282,0.0006821676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99174386,0.0029329928,0.0027368965,0.0017809513,0.00039374287,0.00041160843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028263868,0.00026658026,0.0007493504,0.0006558751,0.0016734512,0.0039388514,0.00078379386,0.0017902931,0.0077695963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012990328,0.00035796268,0.0006412312,0.0008458082,0.005106074,0.0040830425,0.0024586925,0.0020516873,0.0004570353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012762575,0.00012386001,0.011251865,0.00007264174,0.000047834743,0.00018484521,0.00071368716,0.041989703,0.0012659229,0.92884445,0.0009461651,0.0144314235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058603262,0.000106482265,0.006798007,0.00003779326,0.0000313959,0.00012480693,0.00051972107,0.03681983,0.0009601197,0.9471426,0.007366563,0.00003413503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044152373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045438334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077695963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029891746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018564131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025991857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620746154","doi":"10.1561/100.00017008","title":"When Can Citizen Communication Hinder Successful Revolution?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations; Political economy; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.03311839781464777,"score_gpt":0.36839993212436384,"score_spread":0.3352815343097161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620746154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45762843,0.0039783656,0.026330292,0.08565066,0.0008473835,0.0001498595,0.0004619362,0.00021520095,0.4247379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323905,0.00067337777,0.00073670066,0.0016642101,0.0002366837,0.000050517927,0.000054538992,0.000021337908,0.0033235976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289703,0.004095542,0.0002055218,0.00074634305,0.0007397695,0.001315778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224943,0.06071597,0.01100236,0.002198196,0.0019812947,0.0016078422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074285134,0.0005236953,0.00065633934,0.0010887774,0.002914317,0.006225931,0.0008714346,0.004178264,0.023544332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07116231,0.00033079417,0.00049403805,0.0011555556,0.003501292,0.009276205,0.004221531,0.0035688672,0.0026590128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00129932,0.0007097622,0.0616171,0.0010550469,0.00018491459,0.0015591722,0.010461822,0.00827065,0.0021616046,0.76834345,0.030335044,0.1140021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034497475,0.00062710064,0.031943634,0.000692641,0.00030902936,0.0011008915,0.019030666,0.02219803,0.0042428253,0.7994951,0.11986745,0.00014767867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030045575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024584993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023544332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028530674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027758502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078763664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754471702","doi":"10.1561/100.00017133","title":"Uncontested Primaries: Causes and Consequences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Barriers to entry; Competition (biology); Competence (human resources); Perfect information; Economics; Observability; Business; Political economy; Microeconomics; Monopoly","score_opus":0.043984803486823515,"score_gpt":0.3766775145055533,"score_spread":0.33269271101872977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754471702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244472,0.003980493,0.032051068,0.030593053,0.00034292127,0.00014380847,0.00064446055,0.00018615594,0.10761088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691063,0.0003527137,0.00067556376,0.00034600013,0.000106289095,0.000011938233,0.000035531837,0.000014921213,0.0015464553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967721,0.0009671494,0.00019627612,0.0006402333,0.00075061084,0.0006736188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96023303,0.019487277,0.009892943,0.0055962685,0.0025885683,0.0022018584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005265768,0.00052669994,0.0011034828,0.0022463931,0.0028395932,0.004604842,0.0016270919,0.0023352837,0.014859194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031190315,0.0006150309,0.00074278814,0.00156034,0.008993938,0.003127504,0.0064418637,0.004282641,0.00080203393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038230023,0.00044024986,0.12283299,0.00026566914,0.00015819549,0.0034717184,0.001991396,0.0042292937,0.0006851263,0.81151044,0.006764314,0.047268264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105031104,0.00011790207,0.029581938,0.0001638848,0.00009185235,0.002220579,0.0019866596,0.011987113,0.0011236671,0.94324636,0.009324686,0.000050291685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032346777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036568968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014859194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025908486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013168437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049708962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889324902","doi":"10.1561/100.00017161","title":"Are Americans Stuck in Uncompetitive Enclaves? An Appraisal of U.S. Electoral Competition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Uncompetitive inhibitor; Political science; Public economics; Positive economics; Physics","score_opus":0.04539026716107978,"score_gpt":0.40989455349163173,"score_spread":0.36450428633055193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889324902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523213,0.0015686447,0.000084131214,0.010683566,0.00006822237,0.000009958216,0.00022489358,0.0000035854052,0.035035674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977806,0.0005433596,0.000028876455,0.00084767345,0.000058417387,0.0000054685815,0.00014431552,0.0000041086732,0.00058727205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708253,0.0010094126,0.00014091897,0.00021748808,0.00071606744,0.0008335182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917882,0.0015592134,0.0016673593,0.00025901085,0.0017898511,0.0029362724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035716407,0.00013338897,0.00037797558,0.0025681257,0.0050934814,0.0044604056,0.00064943073,0.0009030673,0.0046277847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00731889,0.00013474135,0.00025891868,0.00474327,0.0029058256,0.0028606267,0.0025794033,0.0013349081,0.0002744162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046394236,0.0003263853,0.82645893,0.00012510674,0.00009004845,0.00041311633,0.047060866,0.00020539771,0.00025999197,0.024575891,0.020276712,0.07974353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018236857,0.00018239474,0.87138546,0.00012166134,0.00002107363,0.00016156306,0.10248861,0.0002776113,0.00009048193,0.0023963691,0.022829685,0.000026910948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057607166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1359795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057607166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026068005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022238991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114543736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118743956","doi":"10.1561/100.00019123","title":"A Model of Interest Group Influence and Campaign Advertising","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interest group; Advertising; Political science; Group (periodic table); Business; Politics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.03846102189926111,"score_gpt":0.26116863345879593,"score_spread":0.22270761155953483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118743956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47194275,0.0014202787,0.25227165,0.012194892,0.00023427782,0.00029788807,0.0012060187,0.00038093014,0.26005134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94950104,0.00042688442,0.0061794394,0.00028047862,0.00018212612,0.00012105217,0.000174137,0.000029214278,0.043105636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981731,0.00090764195,0.000040740288,0.00027142884,0.00019791115,0.00040917788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543273,0.0028404319,0.00068894646,0.00026445865,0.0003607861,0.0004126508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021602293,0.0006838747,0.0015056825,0.0009811616,0.0013218599,0.0035628967,0.0023099137,0.0031460673,0.022913784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005941948,0.0005167646,0.0009761903,0.00147781,0.0017189999,0.002570566,0.0012032184,0.001958106,0.0027017852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035336014,0.0002687689,0.00413603,0.00011640708,0.000090027854,0.0007230221,0.000697092,0.14014512,0.0011599297,0.837125,0.0051906584,0.009994637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040647315,0.00024786688,0.002308497,0.000029936526,0.000077118166,0.00025547322,0.00041507848,0.6831921,0.00029044395,0.30069014,0.012029558,0.00005738718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008405931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005985636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022913784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021003317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010301273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076654255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121756914","doi":"10.1561/100.00012036","title":"The Political Economy of the Subprime Mortgage Credit Expansion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mortgage insurance; Collateralized mortgage obligation; Secondary mortgage market; Mortgage underwriting; Government (linguistics); Business; Financial system; Subprime mortgage crisis; Shared appreciation mortgage; Legislation; Economics; Finance; Financial crisis; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016421854637156806,"score_gpt":0.22505473271762247,"score_spread":0.20863287808046566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121756914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966222,0.0010540008,0.001114133,0.014920652,0.000081705504,0.000021557007,0.00025184642,0.000010252012,0.08592366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960056,0.0002367922,0.000070620146,0.0006375912,0.00007914929,0.00000815072,0.00003756149,0.0000031208526,0.00292139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994299,0.00017533948,0.000010802161,0.00008719126,0.000072197356,0.000224556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.00068312493,0.00064447004,0.00004852693,0.00010577505,0.00039321452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001088247,0.00009970207,0.00024096774,0.00085946877,0.0014627345,0.0023787834,0.00020373386,0.00082942366,0.010045826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028376763,0.00016728802,0.0001644421,0.0006835998,0.0016243482,0.001149663,0.0014309073,0.0014934913,0.00041682651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065179035,0.00051558134,0.40732887,0.00013802672,0.00009278357,0.0013676236,0.010544579,0.0032178522,0.0030652646,0.48310065,0.016897503,0.0730794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009472709,0.0002070092,0.824787,0.00012787055,0.00007450688,0.00029485687,0.009970138,0.007572966,0.0019687188,0.07228328,0.08257665,0.000042216157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009588354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015744144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010045826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023461394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008810561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03360665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122048872","doi":"10.1561/100.00013110","title":"Ingroup Bias in Official Behavior: A National Field Experiment in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; China; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05852627036750019,"score_gpt":0.4227106774956094,"score_spread":0.36418440712810923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122048872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996972,0.0000024256142,0.00005136551,0.000017178534,0.000002735224,0.000022173737,0.000013301038,0.0000011618417,0.00019250212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985176,0.000014285209,0.0004718707,0.00008629194,0.0000072312837,0.00010090195,0.00007374228,0.0000016515999,0.00072639395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982412,0.00085927214,0.00009663388,0.00030825028,0.0002161638,0.0002784103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954791,0.0010661973,0.0011146427,0.0010517947,0.00039503758,0.0008931073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005725538,0.0005033591,0.00047548363,0.0004721543,0.0016879146,0.0006091656,0.00057904184,0.00059865456,0.0018929248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028244173,0.00026953258,0.00037795777,0.0003757639,0.0019392862,0.00053352653,0.00064588716,0.00074433535,0.00021809501],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015910227,0.065782316,0.71986896,0.00025662303,0.0005050897,0.0008504868,0.020620257,0.0022442343,0.115869656,0.0053046783,0.002743165,0.050044306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017927085,0.02244069,0.9453166,0.000025683219,0.00021745378,0.00010120007,0.0056634936,0.009347595,0.011586265,0.0018787066,0.0015073555,0.00012225863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016302202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030730996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016302202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013778232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018416143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032414615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124581438","doi":"10.1561/100.00005004","title":"Bicameralism and Government Formation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Stability (learning theory); Economics; Political economy; Affect (linguistics); Economic system; Durability; Politics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02097902358189409,"score_gpt":0.23964930716696264,"score_spread":0.21867028358506854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124581438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94338715,0.0002710129,0.034030538,0.00054296845,0.000022726043,0.000044771772,0.00006189426,0.00005662392,0.021582289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625117,0.000045372988,0.0022181969,0.000029596373,0.000007464788,0.000017216555,0.000033414173,0.0000076191504,0.0013900404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673766,0.0013514974,0.00019181623,0.0006095151,0.0004426572,0.00066699093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881684,0.0047096,0.00394164,0.0017628028,0.0005753787,0.00084220007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002779612,0.00018535065,0.00066854653,0.00095118256,0.0019444394,0.0022249096,0.00077407836,0.0007258305,0.0077441884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016202621,0.00036659776,0.00047139786,0.0012142771,0.003337613,0.002218619,0.0029051765,0.0013702621,0.0006107809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005764609,0.00028471046,0.08015519,0.00021999732,0.00016431845,0.00033960698,0.0053924853,0.050173678,0.006677329,0.78560615,0.0008200087,0.0695902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015838144,0.00048209704,0.08425008,0.000085301974,0.000090762616,0.00054606306,0.004339666,0.056500193,0.005639733,0.8330873,0.014748815,0.000071655835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019635828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034232312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077441884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019029984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012769756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02590692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130607879","doi":"10.1561/100.00017112","title":"Optimal Size of Rebellions: Trade-off Between Large Group and Maintaining Secrecy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Group (periodic table); Political science; Economics; Political economy; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.019879182495718975,"score_gpt":0.3248332259415573,"score_spread":0.3049540434458383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130607879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71674055,0.00079289597,0.1522989,0.008672373,0.00022615796,0.00022852549,0.00026462125,0.00022774792,0.120548286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940796,0.00014117161,0.0024055184,0.00013286238,0.00004577763,0.000050555664,0.000015199684,0.000015149337,0.0031142565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833006,0.0007779848,0.000047008776,0.0002584758,0.00013481766,0.00045163752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679185,0.0065287296,0.0029496297,0.0012470082,0.00042273337,0.0020601123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032227922,0.00076560705,0.0011779543,0.0005934513,0.0017312792,0.003809826,0.0015766248,0.0030141755,0.012025369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016292954,0.000549503,0.000753445,0.0003078898,0.0045242077,0.0054183356,0.0032098086,0.0028329229,0.0007488332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009822744,0.00043233886,0.006695551,0.00023180772,0.00013585063,0.0009344435,0.0010261787,0.13205129,0.0063867276,0.8337029,0.0034396981,0.01398094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005463285,0.0007334374,0.0045229807,0.00010001323,0.00011170985,0.00045085282,0.001349752,0.16982351,0.0012416836,0.81620735,0.0048232228,0.00008907025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013974633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017286112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012025369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022348918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014677081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040228844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409438190","doi":"10.1561/100.00023042","title":"Pivots or Partisans? Proposal-Making Strategy and Status Quo Selection in Congress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03483824254322848,"score_gpt":0.40829030700670305,"score_spread":0.37345206446347456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409438190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97693926,0.0002277651,0.005912867,0.00078963087,0.00001779335,0.000061926345,0.000055056425,0.000034405755,0.015961291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982724,0.000044142365,0.00076331163,0.00003785897,0.00001395241,0.000024987052,0.00002946188,0.000008266553,0.0008055703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893897,0.0062836013,0.00047769095,0.001528111,0.0011798466,0.0011410998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606862,0.022963494,0.008105761,0.0036931634,0.0020682823,0.0024831083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013017525,0.00018380911,0.0006010328,0.002568177,0.0019920545,0.0045368504,0.00066224724,0.0008939561,0.0064695277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054350294,0.0004227688,0.00039162568,0.0026235664,0.004311422,0.0023442248,0.0024400824,0.00094928674,0.0012088629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000747884,0.00035896464,0.7526555,0.00016309191,0.00026128138,0.00017920753,0.017138675,0.0045598727,0.0034700802,0.077561624,0.0019064859,0.14099732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013527262,0.0004177453,0.8887181,0.00009615841,0.00010946503,0.00020153601,0.018740783,0.012790376,0.0017098375,0.068144046,0.008853529,0.000083150735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031204058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006181871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013017525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012098138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014082983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06884408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}