{"meta":{"query_hash":"12628e6bbb28","filters":{"venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/12628e6bbb28","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Quarterly+Journal+of+Speech"},"results":[{"id":"W2005574439","doi":"10.1080/00335630500291521","title":"Whither Propaganda? Agonism and “The Engineering of Consent”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agonism; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010395613562509289,"score_gpt":0.2560756083630068,"score_spread":0.24567999480049751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005574439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595027,0.0032151875,0.00027340156,0.023085913,0.0004722154,0.00021106593,0.0000024442406,0.000017299211,0.013219787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953777,0.00030816277,0.0018781029,0.00011300207,0.00077291345,6.0365545e-7,5.5921195e-8,0.0000047837334,0.0015446717],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992723,0.00006165124,0.00022705605,0.000044003646,0.00027624296,0.00011873497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948925,0.00008886607,0.0001812345,0.000052713818,0.00013028407,0.0000576348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008677016,0.000054244374,0.00015073208,0.00000746371,0.00012319881,0.00004327983,0.00014333734,0.00006199816,0.00006874801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003492033,0.000032327815,0.00009104949,0.00008109835,0.00030881012,0.00015747732,0.000004064971,0.00016534755,0.0000033654273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027182853,0.00017714473,0.00095900544,0.00009319731,0.00040866213,0.000045028377,0.5895335,0.00010135243,0.00905107,0.094992764,0.023270642,0.2810958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075910855,0.00085447077,0.0011630201,0.00041612698,0.00025294512,0.00048321372,0.09337608,0.00025118687,0.0047849445,0.009888604,0.8804666,0.00047176407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034921984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007106241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8571959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021112972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075404016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.131829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154960524","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.609830","title":"Tropical Truth(s): The Epistemology of Metaphor and other Tropes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028028445317286408,"score_gpt":0.2695315050434055,"score_spread":0.2415030597261191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154960524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665459,0.0010392267,0.000079784775,0.0010870256,0.0005684961,0.00007218787,0.0000029689836,0.0000056048298,0.030598843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829614,0.000029511657,0.00097154116,0.00008695208,0.00025467397,7.145075e-7,2.3485022e-8,0.000003990069,0.00035644663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990527,0.00022608602,0.00028929845,0.000062979634,0.00022272943,0.00014619943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.000111974725,0.0002316481,0.000079858655,0.00013437682,0.00007085654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042421676,0.00006155987,0.00021607493,0.000044966946,0.00014269883,0.000016212703,0.0002465597,0.00006537142,0.00026120694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005020749,0.000038961993,0.00009021302,0.0001015617,0.00059401174,0.00010959082,0.0000072303137,0.0001169467,0.0000062354934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092713453,0.0003121754,0.036667954,0.000029619114,0.00032161982,0.00017186369,0.17922494,1.1168127e-7,0.00061752455,0.49907646,0.0031206636,0.27952993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016395185,0.008124269,0.07014832,0.000076503384,0.00039459672,0.00047916372,0.05011074,0.0000026976943,0.0011927946,0.14248031,0.7250047,0.00034637479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001309017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006101218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024875973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007981794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2860033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165248973","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.585171","title":"Review Essay: Assessing Rhetorics of Social Resistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Griffin; Democracy; State (computer science); Social movement; Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Media studies; Art history; Art; Political science; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Theology","score_opus":0.09695040382527086,"score_gpt":0.29854780232135103,"score_spread":0.20159739849608016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165248973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030928683,0.14570789,0.0011349581,0.0029919199,0.0020616853,0.00022246779,0.000013147453,0.00004247818,0.8168968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829126,0.00651597,0.002937776,0.00032318893,0.0010594858,0.0000028476181,0.0000010239997,0.000020080233,0.0062270043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988988,0.00008165888,0.0006184523,0.000056887213,0.00023749244,0.00010671208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829525,0.000046331676,0.0008242448,0.0001586934,0.0006461731,0.0000292958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005138963,0.00008971821,0.00035357306,0.0000598606,0.0002303324,0.00003745438,0.00028883875,0.000023743913,0.00051773293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015105963,0.000069743255,0.00014951236,0.00005479752,0.00016088891,0.0003411625,0.000013236787,0.00016831531,0.000012285393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007838617,0.00034964803,0.0002282155,0.0011854962,0.00036283082,0.000028497427,0.30258745,2.2970431e-8,0.00006934891,0.3805391,0.13100821,0.1835628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037317374,0.00033759573,0.00055683893,0.0017010558,0.00017200787,0.000022000197,0.031205602,6.29447e-7,0.00007520007,0.0117483875,0.95361394,0.00019355277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013072056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027279488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035990022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066792396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5668813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560342508","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2017.1266213","title":"Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020665981247692908,"score_gpt":0.22146315943528092,"score_spread":0.20079717818758802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560342508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175681,0.002070278,0.00012763089,0.036904905,0.0016081721,0.0002588521,0.00003973635,0.000014746804,0.041407567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969841,0.00008623462,0.000055898392,0.0001161674,0.001459804,9.631142e-7,1.1813506e-7,0.0000065487634,0.0012901627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908936,0.00007466871,0.00040578758,0.00006280419,0.00022861008,0.00013877181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991919,0.00024904008,0.00021657621,0.0001026157,0.00015232067,0.00008759647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035252937,0.00008390732,0.00024086359,0.000046269914,0.00006580563,0.000034918205,0.0001496445,0.00002441175,0.0006438058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029000495,0.00003245181,0.00013104826,0.000018838158,0.0004978368,0.00014308975,0.000009458298,0.00010507329,0.000017925651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003177654,0.000075591604,0.00004023065,0.000022743867,0.000072350595,0.000015049539,0.004923423,1.4223597e-8,0.00035566773,0.9275452,0.0007408748,0.0658911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053622727,0.0018759586,0.0001962666,0.00032310162,0.00013615232,0.000219306,0.0010715994,0.00000612937,0.0014211171,0.7730411,0.21616985,0.00017711359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009784168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028702507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21542898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010837245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016961681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70492214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602045680","doi":"","title":"Law, Rhetoric, and Irony in the Formation of Canadian Civil Culture by Michael Dorland and Maurice Charland","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Irony; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Literature; Theology","score_opus":0.006863992282732792,"score_gpt":0.21138936321365132,"score_spread":0.20452537093091852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602045680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97456354,0.0040513584,0.000018504135,0.0063543417,0.00017847776,0.00013930994,0.000033974506,0.000002208933,0.014658297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974595,0.0019206634,0.00006564591,0.00018744977,0.00013201119,6.040958e-7,0.0000013508884,0.0000027673746,0.00023003519],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993804,0.00004896807,0.0001847513,0.000048949183,0.00020165778,0.00013524696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996128,0.000016750471,0.00013039538,0.000043528944,0.000057803754,0.00013873873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004719673,0.00004607442,0.000108377055,0.0003519898,0.0002668969,0.00015163989,0.000111804904,0.00006320948,0.000016444736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008544373,0.000039996463,0.000023345436,0.00020683584,0.00018198481,0.00040066845,0.0000016037645,0.0001334584,0.0000013841988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054009317,0.00011452119,0.0015852964,0.00016494365,0.000036220154,0.00022191733,0.87441427,0.000005517904,0.00095690414,0.027580708,0.06902843,0.02583727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092557986,0.00037626227,0.00319109,0.000087378816,0.000026024227,0.00017809994,0.026627626,0.0000014705396,0.000017307559,0.0037061113,0.9647469,0.0001161384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8178797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99625117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89571846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023772151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022089969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20527823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304806329","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2022.2128201","title":"Rhetorical economy: Affect, labor, and capital in transnational digital circulation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Capitalism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Affect (linguistics); Political economy; Economics; Political science; History; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.012640723581264458,"score_gpt":0.2801224525385109,"score_spread":0.2674817289572465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304806329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98680186,0.00042215982,0.00003793225,0.008689524,0.00032103865,0.00007178974,0.000016838136,0.0000065436857,0.0036323273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951535,0.000008478394,0.00005051808,0.00012903498,0.0002244814,0.000002104529,0.000004531394,0.0000036698102,0.00006181111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990799,0.00017638502,0.00025252573,0.00009312727,0.00024284044,0.00015525772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954706,0.00013402669,0.00012616476,0.000035237266,0.000078678604,0.00007881113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007671891,0.000060430146,0.00013908504,0.000114434566,0.00023735748,0.000059307666,0.00012132597,0.00006189415,0.00018258451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021933834,0.00006375108,0.00006541364,0.00015330406,0.00012727983,0.0005282235,0.000006805272,0.0002835159,0.0000022030194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009396046,0.00019466331,0.13433082,0.000008638031,0.000054130658,0.00020843437,0.10390632,0.00006636547,0.00005773649,0.72151995,0.00038594683,0.039173048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027457478,0.001994095,0.2169309,0.000013047355,0.00003560333,0.00046552246,0.08518252,0.00008608745,0.0000064824317,0.6467455,0.045362458,0.0004320625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003450443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007296794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08260008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022729447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016832555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25996938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}