{"meta":{"query_hash":"3c0377a84602","filters":{"venue":"Queen's law journal"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3c0377a84602","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Queen%27s+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2260291965","doi":"","title":"“The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04442344463517078,"score_gpt":0.3273808466940629,"score_spread":0.28295740205889214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260291965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00135503,0.0031746132,0.001188878,0.98947364,0.0018154945,0.0000061068467,0.000034816232,0.000007835449,0.0029435637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0937147,0.0060444693,0.002840267,0.85361624,0.03879141,0.00006559355,0.000057034384,0.000060581035,0.004809783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860182,0.005664866,0.0011128782,0.0029855564,0.003353881,0.00086460036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76433486,0.21375659,0.006119914,0.0042253467,0.00939274,0.0021705888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02622643,0.0005715779,0.0020545148,0.0030130509,0.0068691727,0.008457882,0.005708104,0.05300877,0.0046923533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14662738,0.0011543164,0.0016324508,0.0034204654,0.047598105,0.023007974,0.004623041,0.049278524,0.0011051123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010823028,0.00003610923,0.0007830667,0.00017587439,0.000038518734,0.000493354,0.0032500483,0.00034951323,0.00010371711,0.7861811,0.197675,0.010805537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008650384,0.000034860066,0.0011909177,0.00063675595,0.000052356518,0.000468521,0.002119775,0.0010516639,0.00047630363,0.83996475,0.15379536,0.00012221739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010336285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010655456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05300877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1387003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601949199","doi":"","title":"Popular constitutional amendment: Referendums and constitutional change in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Political science; Kingdom; Amendment; Constitutional law; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.09018708587682121,"score_gpt":0.30018320084071143,"score_spread":0.2099961149638902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601949199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69302285,0.016698765,0.0005892457,0.04605891,0.00038759699,0.00008928901,0.00079742994,0.00004345424,0.24231245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795009,0.0015662896,0.0001681112,0.001746133,0.00003404346,0.000014489099,0.0000705911,0.000018552988,0.01688095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827754,0.0031763439,0.00062415964,0.0011221478,0.0048399502,0.007461971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968952,0.01363691,0.0019278923,0.00095697393,0.011522994,0.0030032503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194229,0.00024360744,0.0010197845,0.004701747,0.03154671,0.020720486,0.0032009052,0.005532556,0.010099512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04347808,0.0005752095,0.00062801887,0.011836249,0.021990435,0.003853628,0.0040512085,0.006925449,0.00041977773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005394751,0.00022444146,0.037296206,0.00032725095,0.00011714396,0.0011305144,0.08204973,0.0024652132,0.00048598045,0.7973744,0.032771874,0.045217864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039079075,0.00014112922,0.35279512,0.0012443893,0.00037420972,0.00021198957,0.16651215,0.0034383242,0.001270767,0.046904568,0.42614552,0.00057111966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99683255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23467568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23467568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24807082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8876677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622787976","doi":"","title":"The emotional toll and exhilaration of human rights activism: Gender and legal work at the Hague International Criminal tribunal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Political science; Law; Criminal court; Work (physics); Toll; Criminology; International law; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.048529303572582595,"score_gpt":0.2325248847841672,"score_spread":0.1839955812115846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622787976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2483312,0.0071640904,0.0010606501,0.198852,0.0023938527,0.000059263424,0.000037112037,0.000033624634,0.54206824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94497633,0.00087341643,0.00015167586,0.009258613,0.00033795967,0.000054034783,0.0000051430184,0.0000520298,0.04429075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882792,0.0068298546,0.000115425326,0.00058687344,0.00078301196,0.003405655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904653,0.00607542,0.0004491714,0.0002743395,0.00047645014,0.0022594256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012490053,0.0004682013,0.00061374676,0.0022578526,0.052089106,0.027938692,0.002184386,0.011575999,0.0137709025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013890233,0.00057554845,0.00037240703,0.0015922496,0.092766784,0.011366215,0.0136743365,0.013444639,0.00071505894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413857,0.00009693791,0.0011230992,0.000048637576,0.0000061295455,0.00044133593,0.58487236,0.00006104115,0.00019034573,0.37886736,0.017785335,0.01646592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016173519,0.000035297588,0.0021931701,0.00029345017,0.000007395376,0.00013006346,0.7972648,0.000059295613,0.00019678124,0.05076234,0.149008,0.000033309723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048308954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12639444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052089106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013403105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021847501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097246766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971838606","doi":"","title":"But Is It Worth Citing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.08092274683632213,"score_gpt":0.3756979999875408,"score_spread":0.29477525315121866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971838606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090640754,0.0024619347,0.0005556246,0.83023417,0.1436754,0.000018047152,0.00009193219,0.00004071945,0.022015732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015249997,0.0027321407,0.000628862,0.841259,0.09389214,0.000039272476,0.00006433457,0.00012390481,0.04601033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126524,0.0018934328,0.0008390094,0.001201066,0.003652814,0.001148447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440066,0.021992654,0.002684092,0.002650155,0.024549454,0.0041170795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008102003,0.00075979833,0.0016441904,0.0026835138,0.010032108,0.0144704655,0.004519893,0.030907886,0.0129340775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09036695,0.000506173,0.00094472617,0.003706485,0.00943962,0.01146289,0.0047355196,0.025363177,0.010509466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015204969,0.000010647223,0.0004622253,0.00013872467,0.000027671209,0.00025610594,0.0015632856,0.00002754362,0.000074522904,0.023573956,0.9674224,0.0064277207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007809776,0.0000056807094,0.0008226069,0.0006559013,0.000040865547,0.00014122171,0.006005867,0.00013547964,0.00012891005,0.018386582,0.9736278,0.000041251824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03198232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06586095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005137651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00800184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063592374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972940952","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the High Court of Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.1619903611601266,"score_gpt":0.4113545483295878,"score_spread":0.24936418716946118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972940952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46893087,0.015472689,0.0034270366,0.13676722,0.0032646607,0.0010021359,0.00024712613,0.00010941382,0.37077886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89048016,0.0032781602,0.0018799782,0.031197231,0.0013890403,0.00020452063,0.00007052471,0.00005351934,0.0714469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472817,0.017569073,0.0040496783,0.0035030306,0.016277693,0.011318818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.893481,0.062810704,0.005349662,0.003502861,0.029461231,0.0053945724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043017678,0.0003757143,0.0014162698,0.0038927956,0.017949047,0.015793785,0.0036328458,0.017718522,0.003968538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12034285,0.0013142345,0.00079632306,0.0029368948,0.0071847313,0.0030783273,0.0056718844,0.01624778,0.00069151947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006654859,0.00046336412,0.020711862,0.001113967,0.0005447313,0.007951485,0.06687627,0.0037838465,0.0051368815,0.54606265,0.24152616,0.105163306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002920908,0.00051042443,0.1319392,0.0022641947,0.0007277936,0.0010052286,0.02063218,0.008758008,0.0053000962,0.092434615,0.7355495,0.00058660086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26153237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47081137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26153237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027432268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06803434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5200201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303490664","doi":"","title":"Gone But Not Forgotten: The Strange Afterlife of the Jay Treaty's Indian Free Passage Right","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Treaty; History; Philosophy; Ancient history; Art; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.016417889584907308,"score_gpt":0.24763664520272952,"score_spread":0.2312187556178222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303490664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13611092,0.0048053027,0.001072199,0.38260305,0.005598933,0.000028967923,0.00011877823,0.00008650139,0.46957532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7999098,0.0009711301,0.00024182079,0.07451884,0.0010685599,0.000021654141,0.00002471059,0.000178465,0.12306501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584514,0.0015246297,0.00006557754,0.00039700567,0.00053043215,0.001637337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967804,0.0013444655,0.0001950823,0.0003197646,0.00039934204,0.00096084067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004457725,0.00025101897,0.00048755444,0.000664239,0.041918498,0.017386911,0.0015770445,0.007981944,0.009621467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011278073,0.0004143197,0.0003431037,0.0009720696,0.038347736,0.009406682,0.00843547,0.028513925,0.0010912041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059253005,0.000038926577,0.00086202705,0.000029443267,0.000013603611,0.0013463177,0.29250786,0.000049254188,0.00028640602,0.5876063,0.107743174,0.009457378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013366093,0.000025468933,0.0025872614,0.00016390301,0.000016656026,0.000537191,0.24750622,0.000083188126,0.0003498897,0.04092634,0.7077134,0.000077116776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13526653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.257794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86473346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009486349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011060544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2689584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121990827","doi":"","title":"Exploring a feminist theory of harm in the context of conflicted and post conflict societies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conflict theories; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.08863801299420503,"score_gpt":0.3071062412734144,"score_spread":0.21846822827920936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121990827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19934809,0.0037511429,0.036057305,0.1278612,0.00044173494,0.000071514805,0.000083081664,0.000026289063,0.63235956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98865473,0.0006096564,0.0013453147,0.0012387327,0.00007813572,0.00003951649,0.000008532254,0.000015765307,0.008009687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993437,0.004984695,0.00005258431,0.00022497454,0.00044609682,0.0008546289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326503,0.00516302,0.00048693334,0.00029235164,0.00038827708,0.00040447921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005632978,0.00056728214,0.0005999852,0.0019195626,0.012685041,0.008921365,0.002563852,0.00544471,0.007764415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006375497,0.0004222552,0.00065927213,0.0017193543,0.05467829,0.009701364,0.0087415,0.005590018,0.00033960163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078317,0.000016828442,0.00042722706,0.000016479074,0.000002508625,0.00012799382,0.026112262,0.00028615867,0.000029381608,0.97096056,0.0005763774,0.0014363556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012243856,0.00002973015,0.0014086505,0.00010869953,0.000007170168,0.00022127086,0.10041259,0.0011000367,0.000110675384,0.85799205,0.038582668,0.0000141859955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01150381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018367058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012685041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008641547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067511103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06269908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126112262","doi":"","title":"Beyond Mistakes: The Next Wave of Behavioural Law and Economics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04753016435722381,"score_gpt":0.20728524413736402,"score_spread":0.1597550797801402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126112262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049883425,0.027189735,0.07003134,0.69993526,0.0023066865,0.00004128999,0.00039703143,0.00018546655,0.15002978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92159426,0.01144042,0.011498896,0.03465423,0.0036763998,0.000071008835,0.000118924225,0.00016358866,0.016782124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949255,0.0028084149,0.00012986845,0.00050805736,0.001101732,0.0005264703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96326584,0.025376668,0.0017656217,0.0039013505,0.0033496348,0.0023409277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009240793,0.0004018314,0.0010025105,0.0018053107,0.0022337886,0.011728578,0.0017061806,0.0071791895,0.012370815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03690031,0.00040645065,0.00052595744,0.0021590895,0.033487417,0.026101261,0.004442224,0.010589711,0.0009860379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001909855,0.000021851723,0.001127311,0.000040664654,0.000009222887,0.000029339246,0.001322496,0.00030964505,0.00006162712,0.9742134,0.00745827,0.015387035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000521167,0.0000060114007,0.0006671377,0.00005339036,0.0000024352014,0.000016369067,0.0005655791,0.0006545802,0.000017914512,0.9841912,0.013811278,0.000008925044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010799095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008837447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012370815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004619748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004640355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048870564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157468406","doi":"","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected ‘Originalism’?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Scholarship; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02278282913622767,"score_gpt":0.25779704028941336,"score_spread":0.2350142111531857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157468406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07218443,0.011501393,0.0014920097,0.65498483,0.0026194977,0.000038708426,0.00035257736,0.00007734907,0.2567492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672434,0.0034758262,0.000721893,0.09774965,0.0006931415,0.000015787678,0.00010911799,0.000053363205,0.029937776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879376,0.0012948196,0.00019063235,0.00117807,0.0050110277,0.0043877605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849899,0.004849096,0.0006661044,0.00063400116,0.007367561,0.001493381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007805774,0.00027377906,0.0006106604,0.0014684007,0.025795514,0.013990762,0.0037068687,0.00958859,0.0042645093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024979698,0.00031007675,0.0005765288,0.0031239055,0.030321158,0.0043489924,0.0025771142,0.008871275,0.00036967843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028397593,0.000011750528,0.0022009634,0.000079646365,0.000022516142,0.0003698078,0.009597502,0.00019622446,0.00013511992,0.87853825,0.09317094,0.015648982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006454304,0.000028092114,0.011463304,0.00045716306,0.00008362437,0.0002740544,0.023427986,0.0010740807,0.00076007436,0.14151151,0.82064366,0.00021187404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13811472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13811472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16458385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162729231","doi":"","title":"Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Canadian Common Law Courts: An Empirical Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Empirical research; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08677611609302652,"score_gpt":0.2850210844609693,"score_spread":0.19824496836794278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162729231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92789525,0.0007291645,0.00029265045,0.003188788,0.000029644976,0.0001342535,0.00014373234,0.000010797168,0.067575805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174905,0.00046117086,0.00015167789,0.00050145923,0.000009992646,0.000025827878,0.000053632637,0.000006879658,0.0070402394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908565,0.0011091509,0.00020258625,0.0005200229,0.0039092824,0.0034024215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715146,0.00977231,0.0042018523,0.0010157961,0.009595038,0.0039004358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047874595,0.00045644856,0.00073941716,0.005336722,0.03338644,0.012424165,0.0037335928,0.005170122,0.009851177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045747854,0.0006051187,0.00047629606,0.010411483,0.015960904,0.005068061,0.0051391553,0.0046632253,0.0006461784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026279976,0.001121242,0.29929018,0.00036622823,0.00007716093,0.0024367308,0.39525166,0.0015806091,0.0010977755,0.18667084,0.029034391,0.08281039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038643262,0.00013651291,0.3770836,0.00061188894,0.00012038196,0.00031669045,0.54969907,0.0022810958,0.0005518549,0.0071736495,0.06182525,0.00016139903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99492234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11479668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14748968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83291215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170297720","doi":"","title":"Are Members of the Clergy Without the Law? Hart v Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Kingston","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02170633414077549,"score_gpt":0.28034958728406817,"score_spread":0.2586432531432927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170297720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48775083,0.00439076,0.00027457587,0.30638605,0.0015316029,0.00010618056,0.00009750908,0.000027840433,0.19943467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7798033,0.00092215574,0.00012037189,0.106302805,0.00026579315,0.000041803352,0.000017548055,0.000029500541,0.11249681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944977,0.0014111877,0.00012399994,0.0003982492,0.00050664524,0.0030621844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947076,0.0016655712,0.00042699068,0.00027257774,0.00070381275,0.0022234602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041644205,0.00023684224,0.00060049235,0.00036803345,0.030080834,0.008579773,0.002177043,0.015217227,0.009428658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104971565,0.0009933074,0.0003143091,0.00052185036,0.010901186,0.0037009001,0.004683912,0.01587409,0.0010291247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037226386,0.00032223543,0.053985488,0.00025626947,0.00012289606,0.009875805,0.22937669,0.00027043954,0.0016895471,0.32106444,0.35898668,0.02367726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009872526,0.00015703271,0.052493237,0.0007168802,0.00011237368,0.0014043812,0.41576478,0.000250822,0.0011530541,0.014470739,0.51315004,0.00022791041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43153816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75231224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43153816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01123017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03262211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8580527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201920784","doi":"","title":"Rules, Rationality, and the Significance of Standpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02607782510128088,"score_gpt":0.35231795428373686,"score_spread":0.326240129182456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201920784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13466796,0.0049823006,0.04578961,0.049106915,0.00043056768,0.00006246225,0.00012707773,0.000055411736,0.76477766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081427,0.0005241066,0.0034558314,0.0007470022,0.00009412895,0.000033052544,0.000015821155,0.000025095653,0.0042907735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890725,0.007002886,0.00040814004,0.0010222187,0.0017973771,0.0006968048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564376,0.034647916,0.002005713,0.0033930016,0.002374349,0.0011414239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014455058,0.00034397075,0.0007167271,0.0018912113,0.0041437712,0.011037962,0.0013371017,0.0034246221,0.0043183994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037594073,0.00045753416,0.00057916436,0.0012771914,0.053569365,0.009007101,0.0040872972,0.004385442,0.00045269847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001947746,0.00001048467,0.000522679,0.000019355342,0.0000057358566,0.000033777116,0.002326472,0.00023615979,0.00004026232,0.99247336,0.0005494557,0.0037627954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014573453,0.00000651616,0.00033611164,0.000026779948,0.0000049096802,0.000019345467,0.0009676152,0.00027761955,0.000059368034,0.9937139,0.0045665107,0.000006750219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044264654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004599379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014455058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003748256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07644659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205459600","doi":"","title":"A New Duty of Care? Tort Liability from Voluntary Human Rights Due Diligence in Global Supply Chains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Business; Duty of care; Tort; Liability; Duty; Supply chain; Diligence; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015481346846151215,"score_gpt":0.23626165858993312,"score_spread":0.2207803117437819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205459600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10626459,0.0033589902,0.056662682,0.11859415,0.0008798225,0.00012062785,0.00011301266,0.00006031672,0.7139458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545038,0.0010818078,0.0024205546,0.006634667,0.0007696796,0.000107918735,0.000028417226,0.000048945345,0.03440428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930633,0.002706349,0.00026199958,0.00087200734,0.0017483229,0.001348106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98980683,0.0070503983,0.00058900303,0.0014077646,0.00069643656,0.00044958357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086185625,0.00049974985,0.0009608476,0.0012719532,0.0065857405,0.011380294,0.0018718195,0.017946474,0.010605136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018692631,0.0007598824,0.0009725685,0.0011400171,0.03221262,0.022871088,0.008840165,0.012579653,0.0010367602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006487882,0.000008881094,0.00017317386,0.000011093103,0.000003672042,0.000110846275,0.00079082843,0.00020832453,0.0000341546,0.9952282,0.0015804942,0.0018438445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007411838,0.00000929307,0.00021636861,0.00009787326,0.000007586982,0.00012092837,0.00076933525,0.000579674,0.00007762581,0.9881076,0.009990878,0.00001535004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076766484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009652473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017946474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00625047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066107474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04557985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214643642","doi":"","title":"Energy prices, equalization and Canadian federalism : comparing Canada's energy price shocks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Energy (signal processing); Equalization (audio); Economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Telecommunications; Computer science; Channel (broadcasting); Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.009053160324355991,"score_gpt":0.2239465357564442,"score_spread":0.2148933754320882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214643642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7871894,0.0061745667,0.00071262557,0.049229003,0.00031786915,0.00008163544,0.008169279,0.0000978347,0.1480278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874467,0.0015885353,0.0002195573,0.0017418484,0.00004336653,0.000009473842,0.0008448768,0.000018277477,0.008087333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977336,0.00011231113,0.000060025184,0.00013090592,0.0010053612,0.00095769117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957671,0.00080960104,0.0004517321,0.00012837925,0.0023121615,0.0005309554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015372422,0.0002575581,0.0006469702,0.0022192101,0.0059337714,0.0071509536,0.0012783123,0.0019888235,0.0073636086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00959182,0.00023752473,0.00073966815,0.0067082467,0.0024540105,0.0014536384,0.0017194181,0.002368526,0.0001884994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013927722,0.00032498367,0.34113684,0.00043307463,0.00060109026,0.00049433345,0.005788421,0.02842329,0.0010479117,0.4233527,0.11765837,0.079346344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017998002,0.000083920844,0.8538285,0.00018856744,0.00052849855,0.000056278317,0.012753181,0.008467141,0.000926916,0.020994103,0.10177723,0.00021573063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8623735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1376265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16544397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216269932","doi":"","title":"Grounding Equality in Social Relations: Suspect Classification, Analogous Grounds and Relational Theory.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Relational theory; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Criminology; Physics","score_opus":0.07710144002829901,"score_gpt":0.3609637017947458,"score_spread":0.2838622617664468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216269932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20633362,0.0058842055,0.23876294,0.12838814,0.0014688154,0.00042787893,0.000373875,0.00010523542,0.41825527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98504955,0.0004085709,0.010904553,0.00081236043,0.0001950234,0.00010836401,0.00006954152,0.000014897601,0.002437101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815183,0.011268147,0.0011398603,0.0020793485,0.0029397903,0.0010545041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95728064,0.028435908,0.0037412853,0.006194275,0.0034450546,0.0009027941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015591433,0.00040697405,0.0010674796,0.0035653028,0.0074167056,0.007845055,0.0028777746,0.005030991,0.008543725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08241831,0.00040531906,0.0009827736,0.002850407,0.050820444,0.018453121,0.007638952,0.0054760873,0.00050041504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013909879,0.000009566568,0.00050556444,0.000018179831,0.0000046461228,0.000030295689,0.0010396481,0.00007635215,0.000016482922,0.99404377,0.00047805413,0.0037634338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012188771,0.0000060164,0.00043601802,0.000041682557,0.000006647238,0.000027817854,0.0009048693,0.0005580094,0.00005725528,0.9960192,0.0019259644,0.000004254727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055554565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039925817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015591433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004550382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037388091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08245635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}