{"meta":{"query_hash":"3c0377a84602","filters":{"venue":"Queen's law journal"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3c0377a84602","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Queen%27s+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2260291965","doi":"","title":"“The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04442344463517078,"score_gpt":0.3273808466940629,"score_spread":0.28295740205889214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260291965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78353685,0.0011101955,0.00012595864,0.17931047,0.0008610647,0.0007832946,0.0000075756525,0.000016968906,0.034247626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502003,0.0004318982,0.0002530365,0.0009637876,0.0002855674,0.000019063844,6.1839295e-8,0.000009363039,0.0030171669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950673,0.0030751368,0.00052119215,0.0001471118,0.000778685,0.0004105499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555486,0.0034392169,0.0003313363,0.00035900666,0.00022446935,0.00009110244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010702736,0.00011474405,0.00019441744,0.000037025242,0.0015803183,0.000119647135,0.001130391,0.000071079514,0.00013707919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021137637,0.00005730705,0.00012999403,0.00031188552,0.00084412994,0.00025226708,0.000060633392,0.0005400546,0.000025949785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022438746,0.00012541565,0.00021080933,0.00002555697,0.000016700913,0.0000376698,0.06446055,0.000010138222,0.00027803789,0.89972705,0.007334201,0.02553001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033543044,0.0005269823,0.0032591396,0.00039312214,0.00006640797,0.000045690325,0.06299404,0.00000919568,0.0004524347,0.035607066,0.89614326,0.00016725801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036637632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019377572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008561995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010336332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601949199","doi":"","title":"Popular constitutional amendment: Referendums and constitutional change in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Political science; Kingdom; Amendment; Constitutional law; Law; Constitution","score_opus":0.09018708587682121,"score_gpt":0.30018320084071143,"score_spread":0.2099961149638902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601949199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8052357,0.005104397,0.0008998807,0.07895239,0.0033356422,0.0009824514,0.00015965292,0.000052828276,0.10527707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972238,0.0004162436,0.00006153348,0.0017865013,0.00046898445,0.000014267957,0.0000066932425,0.0000018255558,0.000020185424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852955,0.00025691552,0.00023568684,0.0001305412,0.0005686053,0.0002787193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932164,0.00011588824,0.000099255376,0.000044185967,0.00017918978,0.00023981952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088045973,0.00010959922,0.00018717203,0.00006133637,0.0014932363,0.00010017257,0.000114615716,0.000046623853,0.00004017366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018839368,0.000076847566,0.000024318508,0.00019626254,0.010576391,0.00021847388,0.00006282703,0.0002893812,0.000002272032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052939733,0.000010518158,0.025754847,0.0000011469983,0.000026153739,0.00005170695,0.0007345232,0.000017041883,3.3133472e-7,0.97271967,0.0004247082,0.0002063917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052914396,0.00004158702,0.0131362295,0.00017673372,0.00007143509,0.00030081964,0.0090660285,0.000054458193,0.0000031952509,0.26105186,0.71040183,0.00040440288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71166784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054057536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018993973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622787976","doi":"","title":"The emotional toll and exhilaration of human rights activism: Gender and legal work at the Hague International Criminal tribunal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Political science; Law; Criminal court; Work (physics); Toll; Criminology; International law; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.048529303572582595,"score_gpt":0.2325248847841672,"score_spread":0.1839955812115846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622787976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61619806,0.00030376654,0.00031394852,0.0020097184,0.0011722534,0.0001453676,0.000050797855,0.00001928352,0.37978676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892793,0.000010109356,0.000028048016,0.00013677825,0.00066584523,0.0000032073467,0.0000075463013,0.0000066205603,0.009862538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00009216233,0.00028314127,0.000110626,0.00026548162,0.00016235346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947095,0.00009222016,0.00013631707,0.00008207266,0.00012350224,0.00009490957],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022715353,0.00010865468,0.000116154464,0.000026781507,0.0020547388,0.00019116329,0.00014518721,0.000037324837,0.0007885753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000827639,0.000057087327,0.00006923899,0.000012991715,0.00067980663,0.000314034,0.00005545826,0.00025609898,0.000005408258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009027617,0.000047163747,0.000176077,0.0000039993806,0.000053309228,0.000010839949,0.0026077246,3.340443e-7,0.000008998033,0.99534017,0.0013495444,0.00031154964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010339116,0.0003850693,0.018401053,0.00005668398,0.00013478736,0.0002801481,0.001852773,0.00013782055,0.00014304258,0.19873767,0.7785224,0.00031466788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006544635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095177116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79660255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055055985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016751552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971838606","doi":"","title":"But Is It Worth Citing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.08092274683632213,"score_gpt":0.3756979999875408,"score_spread":0.29477525315121866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971838606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026957434,0.00017861646,0.000081732614,0.08411722,0.0008688901,0.000046764977,0.0000016704183,0.000016710856,0.88773096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754034,0.00016892311,0.001417932,0.006246514,0.0012150537,0.0000017894653,5.371473e-7,0.0000076888955,0.015538161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855095,0.00043906097,0.00017942242,0.00010337651,0.0004257108,0.000301474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990124,0.00039580138,0.0001739332,0.000070446775,0.00014281056,0.00020457876],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016186166,0.00006869358,0.00008110638,0.000034763485,0.0015866444,0.00033384768,0.00016512198,0.00006584756,0.0060886224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055055117,0.00006418378,0.00006777402,0.00014685869,0.00014806697,0.000627408,0.0000049878518,0.00038146548,0.00022150851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056291146,0.000045493493,0.00911874,0.0000041552994,0.000028899238,0.000016186521,0.023635142,0.0000030664767,0.000009133364,0.94293004,0.022894967,0.0013085433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008572006,0.000012120475,0.00029564172,0.000020662605,0.000012639278,0.0000247202,0.07181424,3.259774e-7,0.000097667944,0.015941719,0.9116004,0.000094135234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002392099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012501096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007086647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036688754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972940952","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action in the High Court of Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Political science; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.1619903611601266,"score_gpt":0.4113545483295878,"score_spread":0.24936418716946118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972940952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89541817,0.00091115833,0.000021374943,0.01037007,0.0007902817,0.00046427347,0.000013879251,0.000012408871,0.09199838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385,0.005004399,0.00007124148,0.00017631601,0.0004020662,0.0000014594802,9.945777e-7,0.000002688557,0.0004908433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858993,0.0003871139,0.00033847507,0.00006426424,0.0004759015,0.0001443061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993686,0.00006902644,0.0002984699,0.000078120946,0.00013501557,0.00005073623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091858476,0.00006070303,0.00019747473,0.000033962162,0.0004039723,0.000012875027,0.00022021878,0.000051055376,0.000899706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004098485,0.000039751078,0.00008781002,0.00013129774,0.0005048474,0.00016716395,0.000005480738,0.0002517391,0.000009946161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000347455,0.00018148909,0.00083830353,0.00016106834,0.0000244304,0.000074987205,0.012059858,7.827927e-7,0.000024395813,0.9702581,0.016072564,0.0002692762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026758693,0.0017609413,0.21763563,0.0094808005,0.0002908998,0.00035212372,0.020756464,0.0000013956262,0.0035252082,0.19231005,0.5504251,0.00078547513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00515409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073420648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.777948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004717893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017049983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303490664","doi":"","title":"Gone But Not Forgotten: The Strange Afterlife of the Jay Treaty's Indian Free Passage Right","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Treaty; History; Philosophy; Ancient history; Art; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.016417889584907308,"score_gpt":0.24763664520272952,"score_spread":0.2312187556178222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303490664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92728883,0.00014534299,0.000016208358,0.03649601,0.0009089982,0.0002959594,0.00007021296,0.000028984641,0.034749467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955232,0.00024432538,0.000055146385,0.0009417814,0.0011470639,0.000007980337,8.435814e-7,0.00001591876,0.0020637347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977094,0.00048685065,0.00035549907,0.00015767843,0.0008230116,0.0004675556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988258,0.00021541066,0.0002656656,0.0003979796,0.00009915434,0.0001959896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007507596,0.00016103341,0.00023831255,0.00004264344,0.0026303937,0.00011487738,0.0010039624,0.00014556838,0.00041625157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009318311,0.00008927647,0.00031420484,0.00025201976,0.0010228279,0.00026284938,0.000060819206,0.0005339083,0.000017015229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005785907,0.0014368156,0.12828647,0.00007796143,0.0010819539,0.0025055725,0.4597006,0.000048202874,0.0009111799,0.33538625,0.05894075,0.011045625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034090816,0.00036486477,0.35882926,0.0001468411,0.0002545648,0.0003677316,0.011291603,0.000004224305,0.006523103,0.022891559,0.5952774,0.0006396991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015806518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03520252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5363367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114287555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002966473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121990827","doi":"","title":"Exploring a feminist theory of harm in the context of conflicted and post conflict societies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conflict theories; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Social science; History","score_opus":0.08863801299420503,"score_gpt":0.3071062412734144,"score_spread":0.21846822827920936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121990827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92020833,0.0009455075,0.000015525338,0.0059325243,0.00018589034,0.00021035342,0.000014361348,0.000015445068,0.072472036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970309,0.0011161851,0.00002578504,0.0014887823,0.00015587722,0.0000036711947,9.038685e-7,0.000005781205,0.00017207784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982578,0.0005021143,0.0003988538,0.00011877924,0.00043991164,0.00028253288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898094,0.00032987192,0.0002551861,0.00012644792,0.00021295079,0.00009462882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984522,0.00011755835,0.00027142497,0.00006153702,0.00048349902,0.00010552544,0.00034867885,0.00006728409,0.00006907345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014284189,0.000088155786,0.00011533138,0.00015670822,0.00076939136,0.00023433528,0.000020679314,0.00034163098,0.0000012280814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297373,0.00008501866,0.00090458133,0.000012801902,0.000027993305,0.000012640532,0.31275254,4.2932723e-7,0.0005944375,0.6816835,0.00016073727,0.0036923368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012341638,0.00043145168,0.0292776,0.00013409177,0.000052631236,0.000046751138,0.8520289,0.0000029101918,0.0017099577,0.018311735,0.096539706,0.00023010287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023508642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042696984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66337174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027082182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011958062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37187323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126112262","doi":"","title":"Beyond Mistakes: The Next Wave of Behavioural Law and Economics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04753016435722381,"score_gpt":0.20728524413736402,"score_spread":0.1597550797801402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126112262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67112607,0.0020181353,0.00031790635,0.0030492793,0.0017372104,0.00029250517,0.00020865681,0.000021754997,0.32122847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726903,0.00056331255,0.00032799007,0.001109199,0.0005500075,0.000005630076,0.000005592365,0.00003511778,0.00013409623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812794,0.000023806826,0.0011578054,0.00028576143,0.000033739543,0.00037097587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985084,0.000053677293,0.0008878991,0.0003185655,0.00004729785,0.00018414391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007951069,0.00017844905,0.00057965866,0.00007486996,0.0005014068,0.00032780838,0.00028547243,0.0001457751,0.0001503636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019548706,0.0001877915,0.00022067902,0.000057009365,0.00055762014,0.00057652633,0.000042378695,0.00031468362,0.00006513036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017627213,0.00004644424,0.0034127291,0.000012155571,0.00007337889,0.0000075258663,0.00075290183,0.00011914475,0.0000048972515,0.99525815,0.000115746494,0.00017931586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002047017,0.0002204018,0.0033001695,0.00004761783,0.000034360808,0.00029605848,0.0013033632,0.00009449109,0.0003065759,0.94370407,0.048187394,0.0004584846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01172038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026847068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32614297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021446934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003989674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99486065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157468406","doi":"","title":"Has the Supreme Court of Canada Rejected ‘Originalism’?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Law; Original meaning; Constitutionalism; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Scholarship; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02278282913622767,"score_gpt":0.25779704028941336,"score_spread":0.2350142111531857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157468406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08404345,0.0006320633,0.00046338094,0.37672067,0.002552712,0.00022521909,0.000053224696,0.000038678903,0.5352706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765646,0.00017734065,0.000029883971,0.0004372343,0.0006974196,0.000001893627,1.6328345e-7,0.000002846022,0.000996726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873763,0.00014763637,0.00018939885,0.0000713526,0.00059369445,0.00026028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920285,0.00019265444,0.00012579147,0.00006935314,0.00030915657,0.00010021913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005345038,0.000065258304,0.0001168712,0.000012815611,0.0022476334,0.000044038276,0.00025320172,0.000031268697,0.00036538357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018447831,0.000032630738,0.000055475048,0.000111174915,0.0010865523,0.000117591175,0.000024079694,0.00011121662,0.0000057436578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016598167,0.000012473159,0.0029669937,7.7086526e-7,0.00004589157,0.000016620726,0.0005483957,0.0000014226497,0.000068552166,0.95273125,0.042949878,0.00064116344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019308587,0.000019892877,0.005530655,0.00004629109,0.00001807254,0.000010323868,0.0014121921,1.8724164e-7,0.00016501304,0.05188245,0.9406449,0.000076911434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9056515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020593581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001665728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162729231","doi":"","title":"Piercing the Corporate Veil in the Canadian Common Law Courts: An Empirical Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Empirical research; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08677611609302652,"score_gpt":0.2850210844609693,"score_spread":0.19824496836794278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162729231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9438787,0.000029497905,0.000006306648,0.0075527285,0.0005468822,0.00038577063,0.0000018987088,0.00003468382,0.047563534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712444,9.1096086e-7,0.000010567979,0.010605152,0.0020791201,0.000010412323,0.000012153947,0.000027987133,0.00012925734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807847,0.00020045612,0.0004311869,0.00021575921,0.0005920802,0.00048203705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878484,0.000049675393,0.00036985907,0.00041930875,0.00027210303,0.00010423722],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026268978,0.00022542488,0.00025614654,0.00013682309,0.0019648597,0.0023547239,0.00083558616,0.00007570586,0.000110125795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000098839255,0.00012195019,0.00006637547,0.0002947871,0.0001984607,0.0013356636,0.000078473255,0.00082102144,0.00013793621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008826131,0.00049953983,0.122005515,0.000010760039,0.000044856395,0.0015163516,0.003670838,0.00029173063,0.0000011016842,0.84500515,0.026515119,0.00035079184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002320231,0.00020934669,0.081743605,0.000058321133,0.00014369443,0.00014056597,0.01283409,0.00093695265,0.0000016281768,0.5686953,0.33236083,0.0005554519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43522412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95897007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52374595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017770262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018829222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170297720","doi":"","title":"Are Members of the Clergy Without the Law? Hart v Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Kingston","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02170633414077549,"score_gpt":0.28034958728406817,"score_spread":0.2586432531432927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170297720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96988374,0.00007429192,0.0000103395005,0.010205619,0.0005186867,0.0002440522,0.000007094374,0.000009297249,0.019046895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989603,0.000032722706,0.000060489183,0.0002550991,0.00029106732,0.0000045553666,2.8333878e-7,0.000008609629,0.00038688583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976131,0.0008262359,0.00041309313,0.00011116219,0.0008126441,0.00022378133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773866,0.00015623486,0.0014597954,0.00023135074,0.00035625213,0.000057720492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012737727,0.00012378368,0.00028252325,0.000012076673,0.0016641957,0.00005690688,0.00065061834,0.00008183316,0.00003720292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040863556,0.0000541189,0.00023215174,0.00022423858,0.0018788741,0.0002216633,0.00011374657,0.0003105456,0.0000014087707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007602313,0.0001623376,0.15131691,0.00007342708,0.00024042334,0.0000013783397,0.12947015,0.0008178373,0.0032544252,0.7116914,0.0022121833,0.00068352453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016359485,0.00022636031,0.7284196,0.0009039692,0.00039647872,0.000020515978,0.058386974,0.00014610786,0.0219538,0.012738531,0.17464897,0.00052270596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042771015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055733595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69895285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009645384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005230826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201920784","doi":"","title":"Rules, Rationality, and the Significance of Standpoint","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02607782510128088,"score_gpt":0.35231795428373686,"score_spread":0.326240129182456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201920784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014157585,0.00015296199,0.0012202513,0.57507366,0.00034621597,0.00019099886,0.0000063347698,0.000013224718,0.40883875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541026,0.00013011169,0.0008126045,0.002392271,0.00030691831,0.0000016840019,9.160354e-7,0.0000015173727,0.00094374054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907243,0.00030986965,0.00020216621,0.000048673206,0.0002784554,0.00008841923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913037,0.00029467355,0.00019257165,0.00006200832,0.00026722616,0.00005313091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001877529,0.000035482914,0.00007145458,0.000020343668,0.00082701875,0.00021090134,0.00010617934,0.000026260432,0.0003227609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043988612,0.000023885243,0.000027748683,0.0001344271,0.00038063328,0.0004432894,0.000004842445,0.0002735984,0.000004640875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024028976,0.000025512523,0.00007853592,8.356321e-7,0.00000565718,4.241787e-7,0.0039086305,0.000002660448,0.00001688991,0.9912049,0.00313076,0.0016011673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044578518,0.000023681014,0.0031082104,0.000009653366,0.000012317107,0.0000073704714,0.004043109,0.0000049735595,0.00006480432,0.38541555,0.60681355,0.00005097402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00382026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060999475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035249268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003993119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6360843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205459600","doi":"","title":"A New Duty of Care? Tort Liability from Voluntary Human Rights Due Diligence in Global Supply Chains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Business; Duty of care; Tort; Liability; Duty; Supply chain; Diligence; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015481346846151215,"score_gpt":0.23626165858993312,"score_spread":0.2207803117437819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205459600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778626,0.000106990796,0.00014678015,0.00033158687,0.00072149036,0.00019508337,0.00001999598,0.000047818827,0.02056767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650085,0.0000012815538,0.0003330162,0.00019340494,0.0025990815,0.0000025724396,0.000052968553,0.000015224127,0.00030162567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807566,0.00003908118,0.0006472499,0.00033395737,0.00052466546,0.00037937085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875027,0.00001941189,0.00039789488,0.0003596577,0.0003648257,0.00010796252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034981943,0.00025808555,0.00044748155,0.000095673546,0.00036802245,0.00026145764,0.00050622417,0.00011542508,0.0007073924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000947489,0.00021101788,0.00015504527,0.00025331991,0.00012287257,0.0012461328,0.0001674855,0.0003159978,0.00007109714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020728917,0.00021494708,0.34506652,0.000074042866,0.00004755432,0.00036634298,0.0005302579,0.00007462842,0.000027624406,0.64692265,0.0058916276,0.000576517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018227882,0.000073344054,0.28850752,0.00018985065,0.00008959354,0.000014016986,0.0003261208,0.00007575118,0.00012294378,0.6506892,0.057641476,0.0004474133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18380031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22139762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056558993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002698944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86050594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214643642","doi":"","title":"Energy prices, equalization and Canadian federalism : comparing Canada's energy price shocks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Energy (signal processing); Equalization (audio); Economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Telecommunications; Computer science; Channel (broadcasting); Statistics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.009053160324355991,"score_gpt":0.2239465357564442,"score_spread":0.2148933754320882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214643642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027617348,0.0016538847,0.002856522,0.062246684,0.0013009618,0.00012900602,0.00015361796,0.00005573483,0.9039862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532116,0.00016689206,0.000062379295,0.006346411,0.001111279,0.0000023845923,0.000009304533,0.000013522756,0.006966689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844575,0.00012251807,0.00025214176,0.00016129595,0.00040729556,0.0006110086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.000054497294,0.00018044686,0.00008671703,0.000104507184,0.0006817273],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024837276,0.00012336309,0.00016038997,0.00007678083,0.002085997,0.00040405832,0.00020064958,0.00009554581,0.00010456987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030408815,0.0001350943,0.000032739015,0.00020564537,0.0001203007,0.000273114,0.000016089369,0.00014633677,6.1896105e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027029769,0.000004665024,0.0012071996,0.0000023167925,0.000009271459,0.00006470657,0.00031825653,0.00011909031,0.0000035188732,0.9078375,0.089546524,0.000884253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017133028,0.000007167129,0.0039629745,0.0000227226,0.0000073598776,0.000029667128,0.00017185035,0.00010802385,0.000030637573,0.0071767448,0.9881272,0.00018437549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95770377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012927096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027955715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216269932","doi":"","title":"Grounding Equality in Social Relations: Suspect Classification, Analogous Grounds and Relational Theory.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Relational theory; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Criminology; Physics","score_opus":0.07710144002829901,"score_gpt":0.3609637017947458,"score_spread":0.2838622617664468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216269932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23568204,0.0001028608,0.0066269636,0.030226775,0.0007263822,0.00032361288,0.000003969991,0.00006594468,0.72624147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995528,0.00010052054,0.00018845176,0.000102807084,0.0008654372,0.000005215412,0.000006150056,0.0000073600327,0.0031961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837303,0.0005124927,0.00031808674,0.00016566688,0.0003969013,0.0002338016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903363,0.00022482465,0.0004184062,0.00013087424,0.00011666699,0.00007562178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038079838,0.000086300715,0.00012536206,0.00012276642,0.0064664874,0.0007959561,0.00023166534,0.00010927796,0.0003103086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048704073,0.00008930004,0.00005638152,0.00011677777,0.0003780092,0.0013872668,0.000048047918,0.00030923667,0.000016637594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017335704,0.000020418931,0.08191248,0.0000020793577,0.000015382702,0.0000035377916,0.0041706157,0.000001301457,0.000006034018,0.9100087,0.00027681538,0.0035652467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036968754,0.000010707055,0.6628604,0.000014917305,0.000018561208,0.000001922778,0.0026380233,0.000050441307,6.4362285e-7,0.29491693,0.03901496,0.00010279038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023730826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072753765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029565033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007859159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}