{"meta":{"query_hash":"0df7ed6a0ecb","filters":{"venue":"RCCS Annual Review"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0df7ed6a0ecb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=RCCS+Annual+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1979319784","doi":"10.4000/rccsar.239","title":"The Janus Model of Legal Regulation: Changes in the Political Status of Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RCCS Annual Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democratization; Rationalization (economics); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.05014283873728248,"score_gpt":0.36527672161605856,"score_spread":0.3151338828787761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979319784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525659,0.009653623,0.14566748,0.05590106,0.0007760451,0.00011051784,0.00010892703,0.0001412844,0.67238444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825196,0.0024147904,0.005955674,0.0016107762,0.00037976744,0.000084816886,0.00001970338,0.000021702263,0.0069931843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.0018331826,0.000113431044,0.00069721846,0.0012889177,0.00041418767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962172,0.0019919667,0.00058260054,0.0004881626,0.0005215305,0.0001984406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047022407,0.0001896816,0.00044622985,0.0020828936,0.0027386684,0.0058950107,0.0009640276,0.0014892841,0.0022601269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060964874,0.00019593028,0.00043349512,0.0012663028,0.021470636,0.0060642147,0.0020391527,0.0026528526,0.00035289384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022684044,0.0000028260652,0.00010086482,0.000007182904,0.000001272291,0.000006089311,0.0002545309,0.00015877269,0.000041253752,0.99748117,0.00023168496,0.0017121518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000810534,0.000015770365,0.00088259217,0.000042419888,0.000005029731,0.0000351056,0.00042341358,0.0014571663,0.00013067355,0.98154044,0.015446613,0.000012672618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027143606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002693722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058950107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003541785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036653448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02569753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}