{"meta":{"query_hash":"c87f1cddbc66","filters":{"venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c87f1cddbc66","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=REVISTA+QUAESTIO+IURIS"},"results":[{"id":"W1503623373","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2015.16906","title":"Embedding free versus slave labor regulation in thetransatlantic British Empire and the United States, 1835-1860 / Incorporação livre versus trabalho escravo no regulamento transatlantico do Império Britânico e dos Estados Unidos, 1835-1860","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Political science; Immigration; Empire; Sociology; Economic history; Law; Humanities; Political economy; Geography; History; Art","score_opus":0.041409231183756855,"score_gpt":0.31328667685485306,"score_spread":0.27187744567109623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503623373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301519,0.0021304202,0.00017727328,0.0015569067,0.000035299225,0.00001008457,0.00007992573,0.000003389428,0.06585476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360055,0.00039152624,0.000052153588,0.00009671981,0.0000070613037,0.000004632776,0.000029788998,0.0000032602488,0.005814132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989668,0.00030400426,0.000038100814,0.000115981886,0.00019195116,0.00038307198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906296,0.0002672282,0.00021847316,0.000057997484,0.00021764298,0.00017580847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014807457,0.0000907406,0.00014181281,0.0013534989,0.004200993,0.0034975868,0.00047100685,0.00074906263,0.0037630552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017430998,0.00019189896,0.00009049328,0.0015917463,0.008538181,0.0012418613,0.0018888483,0.0010973372,0.00021960761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016890278,0.00013010015,0.112142794,0.00011733186,0.000029106886,0.000957248,0.5537114,0.00042281725,0.0014547457,0.2705526,0.005094707,0.05521822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007794708,0.00007951603,0.5614739,0.00042452817,0.000019757366,0.00012852838,0.2762534,0.00026437888,0.0006382341,0.005512975,0.15516047,0.00003652876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44039875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7408943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44039875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013528051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054179095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8756707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976445175","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2012.9867","title":"A TEORIA POLÍTICA DA PROPRIEDADE NA ERA MODERNA: ASCENSÃO E CRÍTICA DO INDIVIDUALISMO POSSESSIVO / A POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY IN THE MODERN ERA: RISE AND CRITIC OF POSSESSIVE INDIVIDUALISM","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Politics; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05241774594116107,"score_gpt":0.33858994964594574,"score_spread":0.2861722037047847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976445175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16537474,0.023331713,0.009709333,0.20692265,0.0009471044,0.000027171209,0.00005078148,0.000040457657,0.59359616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987818,0.003129101,0.0004143397,0.00141461,0.00031182307,0.000011924445,0.0000061430505,0.000014066223,0.0068799206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602973,0.0023251227,0.00011361809,0.0004353147,0.0007441829,0.00035202462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919369,0.005025271,0.0011300845,0.0006115853,0.0008451314,0.0004510214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162844,0.00021148776,0.00038588533,0.00197301,0.00432982,0.009355117,0.00078962056,0.003056744,0.0051650894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071769906,0.00025159353,0.0003903587,0.0020745343,0.034446236,0.008239023,0.0030624673,0.004715958,0.0002897912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007652428,0.000006358229,0.00068437506,0.000028106093,0.0000029598216,0.00003574957,0.0050873663,0.00006689417,0.000043987995,0.98821914,0.0012533601,0.004564021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025625848,0.00006136164,0.0135421,0.0007307356,0.000040247356,0.0003441313,0.0307189,0.0017009834,0.0006253607,0.69059944,0.26156452,0.00004659123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043756487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055232216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009355117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006577036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036462988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047719896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111562345","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2020.40219","title":"Asymetrical federalism: theoretical origins and tautology in the term","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tautology (logic); Concreteness; Term (time); Idealism; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03030049837378039,"score_gpt":0.32180079492425145,"score_spread":0.29150029655047105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111562345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0780292,0.009899255,0.20914216,0.039511647,0.0011348961,0.00007752461,0.00013588487,0.0000934118,0.66197604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97965527,0.00169518,0.011906302,0.0011249252,0.0005482597,0.0001104026,0.00004396105,0.00003348756,0.004882146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616015,0.0020763865,0.00015481564,0.00050486997,0.00077363616,0.0003300671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619126,0.0023589185,0.00039246609,0.0005125444,0.0004109819,0.0001337726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049872077,0.00027553068,0.00053407985,0.002336874,0.0036849,0.0045182756,0.00082379853,0.0020959566,0.0036044645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00829248,0.00020435508,0.000540424,0.0024954847,0.0307051,0.007217386,0.003031731,0.003488735,0.0004466556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001003053,8.4083604e-7,0.000022222304,0.0000033334995,3.3183872e-7,0.0000046001724,0.00012928224,0.000025947673,0.0000065009085,0.9993075,0.00009560096,0.00040276482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022884817,0.0000028720858,0.000045111166,0.0000121517105,7.928627e-7,0.000019536237,0.00010860562,0.00021300442,0.000022667813,0.99515885,0.004412654,0.0000014526594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007749592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049872077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001590115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029108942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192499406","doi":"","title":"Embedding free versus slave labor regulation in thetransatlantic British Empire and the United States, 1835-1860","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Immigration; Humanities; Economic history; Economy; History; Law; Art; Economics","score_opus":0.030454428643564412,"score_gpt":0.3126795302236978,"score_spread":0.2822251015801334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192499406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62643546,0.0098108,0.00052691443,0.0038995033,0.00014277188,0.000022847878,0.00021155667,0.000011907174,0.35893828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96513736,0.0013468073,0.00012169381,0.00030731695,0.000028552318,0.000011999412,0.000047878468,0.000009209785,0.032989226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988978,0.0003052848,0.000043075608,0.00013611904,0.0001811119,0.00043654192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919945,0.00028451998,0.00012611419,0.000056600256,0.00020599918,0.00012735082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010241024,0.00013461974,0.00016146294,0.001585731,0.0052944436,0.0036147078,0.00048306058,0.000900366,0.0040601646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001827595,0.00022409373,0.000093055736,0.0020451585,0.009450656,0.0015841366,0.0016757606,0.0011846664,0.0002692973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008863265,0.000059458966,0.019860206,0.00009839281,0.00001292733,0.0005693076,0.25458485,0.00032656873,0.0006053651,0.6730046,0.0076972125,0.04309253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127836975,0.00007141743,0.21333618,0.00052726123,0.000021691163,0.00019424604,0.10215798,0.00034975528,0.0006444872,0.020234408,0.66240215,0.000047673915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.554927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7961021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018839726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006439271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89538825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}