{"meta":{"query_hash":"7dee6eed0035","filters":{"venue":"Ratio"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7dee6eed0035","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ratio"},"results":[{"id":"W1486718986","doi":"10.1111/rati.12000","title":"Laws of Nature Don't <i>Have</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses, They <i>Are</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.02035335800772086,"score_gpt":0.3033767068206914,"score_spread":0.28302334881297053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486718986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04990963,0.0029932181,0.13623275,0.07655976,0.0048542717,0.00017984434,0.0008121405,0.00038779047,0.72807074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8859116,0.0017107221,0.046421982,0.020745955,0.0023295546,0.0004914303,0.0005778362,0.0002753944,0.04153555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756336,0.0008147034,0.00022927231,0.000557267,0.0005933886,0.00024200974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956025,0.0023225853,0.00068528,0.00069233036,0.0005553807,0.00014195128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004593619,0.000564022,0.00067704485,0.0007285862,0.002419011,0.00569569,0.0019808637,0.0031568261,0.011320097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008272165,0.0005965889,0.0006902359,0.0009308929,0.016683826,0.011268544,0.0027453536,0.008056727,0.0025241096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007881124,0.000005567716,0.00013214452,0.000019152529,0.000002758599,0.000010776042,0.000478658,0.000022229826,0.0000995211,0.9964258,0.0016825816,0.0011128808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025062775,0.000033215638,0.0014484976,0.0000677234,0.00002561126,0.0001628172,0.0009032995,0.0006285828,0.00088316726,0.8915541,0.10423866,0.000029202149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015726882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022755286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011320097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019455816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014390594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037869453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522518042","doi":"10.1111/rati.12009","title":"Freak Observers and the Simulation Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"FREAK; Argument (complex analysis); Observer (physics); Epistemology; Observable; sort; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Physics","score_opus":0.015037447379171821,"score_gpt":0.24500555816499692,"score_spread":0.2299681107858251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522518042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19459388,0.0039808676,0.13939574,0.10041957,0.0028244061,0.00014368187,0.00013469052,0.0002583535,0.5582489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97701865,0.00050015445,0.005322127,0.0032509656,0.00039109186,0.00006540821,0.00003855913,0.00003290939,0.013380137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577135,0.0023986918,0.00013684451,0.0007262703,0.0005711426,0.00039567114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906687,0.0058547826,0.00082078844,0.0011263057,0.0010148602,0.0005146299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005678221,0.00048773133,0.00056022627,0.0015669155,0.002729152,0.0029077495,0.0013867359,0.004037224,0.015325317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01640344,0.00044286074,0.0008026509,0.00046846626,0.013212424,0.007944193,0.0040664324,0.0046995655,0.0011773013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875318,0.0000069153575,0.00021156324,0.000009153203,0.0000034832944,0.000032316766,0.00019665905,0.00026698102,0.00006360155,0.9975212,0.00076369214,0.00090558635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043038744,0.000028582133,0.00038348747,0.00006350356,0.000012149723,0.00012706738,0.00033451917,0.003297718,0.0003903242,0.9688653,0.026433645,0.00002076325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001574131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007103034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015325317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002485182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001272235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05126828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542702755","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00543.x","title":"SELF‐KNOWLEDGE AND MORAL STUPIDITY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Stupidity; Moral disengagement; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Morality; Moral psychology; Psychology; Rationalization (economics); Moral responsibility; Harm; Social psychology; Moral authority; Moral reasoning; Self-deception; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20179518758569248,"score_gpt":0.5388453456551577,"score_spread":0.33705015806946526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542702755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5612092,0.0057456493,0.009979029,0.044565134,0.0002244862,0.000034312958,0.00005544434,0.000028382574,0.37815845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.0003539479,0.00018826379,0.00042773184,0.000033002565,0.0000037845878,0.000003398298,0.0000015401203,0.0013470185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699914,0.0019661423,0.00009907622,0.00014695789,0.000508571,0.00028013787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780701,0.013015474,0.004176325,0.0008202089,0.002334513,0.0015833766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032888097,0.000155793,0.00024724938,0.0010152009,0.0015757139,0.004021502,0.00041454186,0.0011938909,0.0042673247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01421752,0.00012925942,0.00017814964,0.00049429474,0.01850878,0.0026137587,0.003303774,0.0019448234,0.0002903496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006235611,0.00025789067,0.029437479,0.00021262703,0.00003956217,0.0006559847,0.023828173,0.0009602044,0.00034506948,0.90734553,0.0046876757,0.032167464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017285922,0.00008258166,0.029324843,0.00030251715,0.000029732684,0.00088188465,0.015492866,0.0018133641,0.0007274657,0.92690974,0.02436833,0.000049531063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011674918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000957204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042673247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017148228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016130558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017393053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572252090","doi":"10.1111/rati.12062","title":"Some Ontological Consequences of Atomism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Atomism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Metaphysics; Motion (physics); Ontology; Physicalism; Physics; Classical mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0353723973225685,"score_gpt":0.31718453649353173,"score_spread":0.28181213917096326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572252090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09891945,0.0041048876,0.12987176,0.094998926,0.0011420766,0.00006524485,0.00024337765,0.00014085323,0.67051345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97833806,0.0008513572,0.010705424,0.0035352616,0.0005738108,0.00009811483,0.00008068567,0.00007169847,0.005745593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559975,0.0022452537,0.00017119017,0.000657385,0.0009433175,0.00038312047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455595,0.0034412174,0.00029755477,0.00070565107,0.00073469954,0.00026484838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048740623,0.0003370945,0.0006430452,0.0014128193,0.0044095037,0.0050221817,0.0014820731,0.0029693395,0.0056481343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009661535,0.000440855,0.00078123016,0.0012323644,0.031102145,0.010190852,0.005637451,0.006158762,0.00065320794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003740358,0.0000028226002,0.000040511797,0.0000061640326,0.0000013526527,0.000014904878,0.0002627678,0.00006201064,0.000035915295,0.9985316,0.00041518986,0.00062306406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021719668,0.0000013749046,0.000043272,0.000005237094,0.0000010587188,0.00000987235,0.00012263657,0.0002264838,0.000022740287,0.99756205,0.0020014222,0.0000016229329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011820986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056481343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034468442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00128838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025776803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632817046","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00382.x","title":"THE FABRICATION METAPHOR","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Commit; Philosophy; Perception; Realism; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.025597666178316318,"score_gpt":0.24086090155487444,"score_spread":0.21526323537655812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1632817046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008972444,0.006112123,0.066118225,0.019164054,0.0014478939,0.00005912724,0.000076306176,0.0002968958,0.89775294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7721655,0.0042754007,0.041752372,0.0073861512,0.0009123637,0.00027733104,0.00013347267,0.0004254756,0.172672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715805,0.0015917291,0.00010075707,0.00033712477,0.00064131356,0.0001709541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983986,0.000990312,0.00010170594,0.0002077484,0.00020856867,0.00009302795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020060588,0.0008536527,0.0003861834,0.0013571506,0.003269722,0.004456553,0.0012782977,0.003065159,0.02380507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044129426,0.00041296522,0.00053602725,0.0009444859,0.01996666,0.0077965437,0.0036699434,0.0040383404,0.003540377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061595306,0.0000040522596,0.000018474495,0.000023978195,9.363182e-7,0.0000619897,0.0010622081,0.000056785968,0.00019310258,0.9931335,0.0028750245,0.002563833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021488542,0.00003750532,0.000088692635,0.00014380223,0.0000043484056,0.0006283186,0.0017397125,0.0006107146,0.00060969044,0.5402612,0.45584193,0.000012685218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011340156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089883467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02380507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022174118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015550702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07963592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903656838","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00498.x","title":"DOES PERCEPTION OUTSTRIP OUR CONCEPTS IN FINENESS OF GRAIN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fineness; Perception; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04865859430877825,"score_gpt":0.3430707012506878,"score_spread":0.29441210694190956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903656838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44944385,0.012506202,0.12454737,0.049476154,0.0012852794,0.000045780194,0.00019638031,0.00047880784,0.36202013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915036,0.0007496958,0.0040503116,0.00096960034,0.00014712576,0.000009299486,0.000020668815,0.0000515096,0.002498233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909496,0.00026334292,0.000045557128,0.0002384809,0.00027440634,0.00008322598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963676,0.002110352,0.00039307593,0.00048242032,0.00042743576,0.00021911606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023313386,0.00034036834,0.0004742237,0.00087433355,0.0007107164,0.004160104,0.0009870332,0.0013939529,0.006560398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006382463,0.0004280752,0.00036879897,0.00052459183,0.012334595,0.013890845,0.0025375495,0.0025398023,0.00054465176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014945825,0.000047210582,0.0019899707,0.00015511348,0.000023606946,0.00016938681,0.0044880644,0.0005923728,0.006686205,0.95193917,0.0022089912,0.03155034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024129818,0.00006435244,0.004052756,0.000071819646,0.0000116738165,0.0001898848,0.0016788675,0.0015365753,0.0009317134,0.9743089,0.01710554,0.000023679404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017242464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009882122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006560398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011314561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005694485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021946669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908302690","doi":"10.1111/rati.12097","title":"Epistemic Value Monism and the Swamping Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Premise; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08529585516567487,"score_gpt":0.26259036325555307,"score_spread":0.1772945080898782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908302690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06857009,0.005277765,0.38792685,0.10518225,0.0011805431,0.00013151091,0.00016059897,0.0005372007,0.43103322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97312784,0.0005118754,0.015527441,0.0027842366,0.00059033564,0.000104280756,0.000025406282,0.00013901999,0.007189562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98313737,0.00879736,0.0008532033,0.0023327183,0.003667841,0.0012114963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95959336,0.027587581,0.0018750575,0.006766252,0.0032375988,0.00094009505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017614856,0.00078671216,0.0015500424,0.0032173037,0.004918467,0.008808869,0.0028205696,0.0057056206,0.011009521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045916945,0.0010879526,0.001453177,0.0018859986,0.04418009,0.02400051,0.012191416,0.01214201,0.0011133421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072155763,0.0000037968446,0.000034207922,0.0000149785365,0.000004324792,0.000022935516,0.00018485312,0.000101354344,0.000032947264,0.9979177,0.0003132043,0.0013624394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000588901,0.0000029420225,0.000019378129,0.000018531098,0.000003279263,0.000031942494,0.000058375812,0.0005084775,0.000083285944,0.99699163,0.0022729135,0.0000032660016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019369251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011068507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017614856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006467211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027144097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09315735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971691221","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00174","title":"Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self‐Sufficiency","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Illusion; Passion; Narcissism; Psychology; Flourishing; Social psychology; Allegation; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03650694236829226,"score_gpt":0.2957230461562005,"score_spread":0.2592161037879082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971691221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16237329,0.009440596,0.041702427,0.03667575,0.00034239542,0.000026305683,0.0000450756,0.00006266459,0.7493315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717195,0.0011063046,0.0021441977,0.0009883152,0.00008948231,0.0000147501905,0.000010328333,0.000008750108,0.008466056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917173,0.00035805948,0.000022885913,0.000062889194,0.0002890253,0.00009538809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954945,0.0002145457,0.0000628795,0.000036895643,0.00008694874,0.000049150083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011363075,0.00032933286,0.00023500514,0.0007697773,0.0018130107,0.0027320033,0.0003620975,0.0015616727,0.0013662253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011637448,0.00009604982,0.00021905721,0.00030570605,0.013189385,0.0027264305,0.0013136438,0.0016420136,0.00021507325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011691216,0.0000060955344,0.0001245373,0.000010551562,0.0000019561792,0.00004096298,0.0031796729,0.0001672105,0.00016312489,0.9934958,0.0006502955,0.0021480892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009002013,0.000012047679,0.000648703,0.000025467458,0.000004096109,0.000081485996,0.0012060872,0.00048283316,0.00013239303,0.9827655,0.014626817,0.0000055830733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015288296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001685148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027320033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021409611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008203787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015533805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983495082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00221","title":"Shareability and Objectivity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03683054083108771,"score_gpt":0.21834480078687965,"score_spread":0.18151425995579196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983495082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07555551,0.0046853544,0.1060059,0.030798342,0.00076107297,0.000114037495,0.00012529013,0.00015464406,0.7817998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842578,0.0006321422,0.002952945,0.00096103747,0.00052735215,0.000104483304,0.000045484816,0.0000706115,0.010447953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840491,0.008894793,0.00064329256,0.0020535672,0.0033536598,0.001005579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820518,0.010833198,0.0016597855,0.0035246534,0.00142081,0.00050971686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011638269,0.0007880211,0.0010269613,0.0027183276,0.005295702,0.013876269,0.002196493,0.0038755802,0.009509685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018082594,0.00045577923,0.00086896075,0.0019149648,0.076283574,0.018982112,0.011751509,0.0062624733,0.00076488656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026291561,0.0000030736835,0.0000414549,0.000011046067,0.0000028973998,0.000014355506,0.001459571,0.00004821044,0.000037033526,0.99752814,0.00016493481,0.00068660936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005100765,0.0000056395374,0.00007291352,0.00003623836,0.0000039582687,0.000031908832,0.0009914588,0.00014247446,0.00008722479,0.99004316,0.008575899,0.00000397095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012270194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037672155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013876269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048368983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020775078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061549783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042248626","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00434.x","title":"WHAT IS NATURAL ABOUT FOOT'S ETHICAL NATURALISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Creatures; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Foot (prosody); Function (biology); Philosophy; History; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.03306659182887726,"score_gpt":0.29925118481373075,"score_spread":0.2661845929848535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042248626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035446703,0.005263299,0.018281482,0.6277998,0.003692274,0.000032543394,0.00008496568,0.00010247145,0.30929655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247565,0.0014936174,0.0035960271,0.044750486,0.0022816914,0.000056390516,0.000027707074,0.000071995375,0.022965565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947514,0.0033221345,0.00009390707,0.00041188137,0.00074575463,0.00067492324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881527,0.008388537,0.0005457476,0.00047278224,0.0015989686,0.0008412868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005051196,0.00028275698,0.00036850653,0.0010567452,0.006637531,0.009162585,0.00084675895,0.0039464994,0.0057800957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017313518,0.00016363156,0.00032065515,0.0008791391,0.028185863,0.006472495,0.0023842733,0.0058020037,0.00062204106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001678735,0.0000125392335,0.00019578422,0.000018617095,0.0000041541543,0.00011494347,0.0026304864,0.00012800486,0.00004878007,0.9728909,0.019832514,0.004106515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009331667,0.000013575217,0.000359924,0.00009724571,0.0000063837274,0.000129673,0.0032907154,0.00054474315,0.00015592937,0.87847584,0.11689545,0.000021256921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050783358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043016076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009162585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005127488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027314124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037202716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065190707","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00326.x","title":"UNDERDETERMINATION AND THE ARGUMENT FROM INDIRECT CONFIRMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0314890652546003,"score_gpt":0.230720348990048,"score_spread":0.1992312837354477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065190707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085392006,0.01020666,0.24306752,0.28598264,0.0029040182,0.0002674562,0.00022613075,0.0004787996,0.3714748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97200733,0.00085344864,0.010706002,0.01076014,0.0011946695,0.00018438735,0.000039189057,0.0000953125,0.004159555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93808055,0.041645847,0.0020600506,0.0049394723,0.011520674,0.0017534232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69439214,0.24569228,0.009895539,0.028556434,0.019115288,0.0023483038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046062317,0.00087230525,0.0016175791,0.004374928,0.0038145178,0.007239467,0.004305999,0.010339306,0.0095783705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16295974,0.0009419417,0.0013366623,0.0015411422,0.033787753,0.017608315,0.011793921,0.015202263,0.0014616366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007710745,0.000023640248,0.0006815265,0.00014065193,0.000042859778,0.0003036376,0.0013791268,0.00031931172,0.0001497252,0.9878563,0.0029583643,0.0060677645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007463636,0.000035083656,0.00031431112,0.00023892244,0.000037748152,0.00030753415,0.00042016737,0.0015981119,0.00070201146,0.97903717,0.01720519,0.00002910063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009531403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005647444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046062317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038884492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024528168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24360377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.01787471168403942,"score_gpt":0.22444757767453527,"score_spread":0.20657286599049585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103169171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08715881,0.0056011104,0.0669075,0.050525878,0.00078480016,0.00005189426,0.00013761153,0.000115894014,0.78871655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989677,0.0003600534,0.0031756472,0.0014040078,0.00016394784,0.000031523196,0.000025539879,0.000036566707,0.0051255673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945152,0.0036282032,0.00015117209,0.0004769333,0.0008269841,0.00040146665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452484,0.0032001447,0.00046736153,0.0005986545,0.00081361004,0.0003953515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039021834,0.000402018,0.0005023049,0.0022822202,0.0032280502,0.0054515856,0.0007671878,0.002275862,0.006195972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009449135,0.00020750883,0.0005006419,0.001140079,0.049462304,0.0063736974,0.0042428277,0.0038194184,0.00048008098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059085205,0.0000039459583,0.00014137039,0.000012448646,0.0000023569921,0.000020799778,0.00043420718,0.00011222185,0.000028607772,0.99772614,0.0004847413,0.0010272121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031692427,0.0000056612957,0.0001928359,0.000020837779,0.0000019975357,0.000037996637,0.00033238443,0.00021652381,0.00003932027,0.99258703,0.006558578,0.0000036685824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012911488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010986719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006195972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003575767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009949034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025944173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110504366","doi":"10.1111/rati.12018","title":"Do<i>a Posteriori</i>Physicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Epistemology; A priori and a posteriori; Dualism; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Metaphysics","score_opus":0.02171918970681241,"score_gpt":0.331893481330093,"score_spread":0.3101742916232806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110504366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11860752,0.010322378,0.15377767,0.35231394,0.0040257066,0.00007942229,0.00027021853,0.00047426252,0.36012894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654205,0.002616631,0.008563863,0.014572214,0.0011657464,0.000056850553,0.00009412611,0.00017691449,0.0073331962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950539,0.002263896,0.00022578966,0.000975615,0.0011297226,0.0003511646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98044705,0.010854872,0.0022710697,0.0027731787,0.0027852065,0.0008686091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012280972,0.0005746772,0.00094006606,0.0018530453,0.0028692642,0.007030851,0.0019959346,0.005643428,0.011769865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03003727,0.0006690102,0.0007646934,0.0010808001,0.034975704,0.02288481,0.0036419183,0.007360075,0.0022381542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040661223,0.00002342856,0.0007951972,0.000082763516,0.000024965178,0.000101504505,0.0024653545,0.00013010995,0.0003187127,0.98464257,0.004992905,0.006381803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000956128,0.000007832425,0.00036040854,0.000047710168,0.0000075848184,0.00008511172,0.00065215956,0.0003161307,0.00019341904,0.98984575,0.008463142,0.000011244259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00128182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007770038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012280972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026239892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014644008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06494874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143134544","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00379.x","title":"RULE‐FOLLOWING WITHOUT REASONS: WITTGENSTEIN'S QUIETISM AND THE CONSTITUTIVE QUESTION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.008774348466961375,"score_gpt":0.2528014911494923,"score_spread":0.24402714268253092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143134544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07057071,0.005168135,0.14482437,0.04068881,0.0010916746,0.00009332339,0.00024733224,0.00034004325,0.73697567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718389,0.0011266685,0.010201318,0.0024074593,0.0005144548,0.00006670113,0.000081299506,0.00013690883,0.013626328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959223,0.0015774339,0.0003011388,0.0008324217,0.0010292785,0.00033738537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935673,0.0038502063,0.00042918883,0.0011705703,0.0007904025,0.00019236734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006425636,0.00031191265,0.00073995715,0.0016616501,0.0023973854,0.007275668,0.0018089707,0.0031286487,0.0052018343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012743352,0.00040811996,0.001124211,0.0012499857,0.02608407,0.012768999,0.0029295105,0.004404696,0.0011307913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035647904,0.0000021620926,0.00002012157,0.000008815674,0.0000014863375,0.00001752631,0.00026908529,0.00005321452,0.000040969317,0.9980552,0.0004419185,0.0010859671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000447579,0.0000028312597,0.000034985424,0.000015019001,0.0000026879682,0.000025722813,0.00012472636,0.00022221013,0.000122367,0.9935854,0.005855415,0.000004159468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018880662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011141617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031057838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015164684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033982396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146077072","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00497.x","title":"ON THE IMMORALITY OF THREATENING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immorality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Morality","score_opus":0.2677034102949305,"score_gpt":0.260815378152138,"score_spread":0.006888032142792488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146077072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049296737,0.00459503,0.025038596,0.049733307,0.0008252408,0.000036838956,0.0000379169,0.00006376805,0.87037265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750416,0.0008746527,0.0017467757,0.003920991,0.00020154256,0.000022531058,0.00000898147,0.000036887184,0.018145984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157083,0.005586843,0.00023268037,0.00039075568,0.001646382,0.0005725522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99086493,0.005981007,0.00066970463,0.00094168953,0.0012944085,0.0002483121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058153067,0.0004031782,0.00035436303,0.0010954055,0.004802814,0.0048818416,0.00082452496,0.003841292,0.0048050415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01508398,0.00025297806,0.00028222235,0.00041471148,0.03767415,0.0058655497,0.0032265626,0.005205231,0.0007790174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000812752,0.0000055739633,0.000113748596,0.000020649792,0.0000025674617,0.00008336005,0.0023682003,0.00013786492,0.00009030604,0.9934302,0.0015902726,0.002149188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005830125,0.000017952672,0.00025341735,0.00020894106,0.0000069502503,0.00018642358,0.002058025,0.00048896787,0.0004926908,0.9439546,0.052313063,0.000013077236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020792552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019484347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058153067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00331378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016822858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030754685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169118977","doi":"10.1111/rati.12058","title":"Hypocrisy and the Nature of Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Notice; Disposition; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Inscribed figure; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014673596263842112,"score_gpt":0.22069302299450422,"score_spread":0.2060194267306621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169118977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37686962,0.0067864703,0.056052756,0.06363204,0.00046869888,0.000060869334,0.00009996759,0.0001032338,0.4959263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694926,0.00021978367,0.0009849506,0.00043962395,0.00004914871,0.0000088685665,0.0000074791146,0.0000058900855,0.0013349104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938939,0.0034579318,0.00026825457,0.0006545027,0.0012465514,0.0004788444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935986,0.0057333377,0.0017263421,0.0011578115,0.001554171,0.00046851338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006557664,0.00021293608,0.0003461592,0.0017798345,0.0021523815,0.0054130964,0.0008571698,0.0021053976,0.0026087502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013225684,0.00032158918,0.00028638434,0.0010823106,0.04968633,0.007794397,0.002973056,0.0041100113,0.00017996896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012380263,0.000006401222,0.000453851,0.000012960417,0.0000034672844,0.00005878264,0.007328236,0.00011905659,0.000116978066,0.990213,0.00023262802,0.0014422722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013373926,0.000016638818,0.0009110146,0.000059823567,0.000005843828,0.00013290271,0.0031058635,0.00087115983,0.0001569396,0.98485965,0.009856215,0.000010646347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033617124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015974888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006557664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042552333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019875956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034680605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222931779","doi":"10.1111/rati.12128","title":"Subject‐Relative Reasons for Love","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy of love; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10743343240990283,"score_gpt":0.3829748444764652,"score_spread":0.27554141206656235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222931779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121377535,0.0018409222,0.026294524,0.017922057,0.0008025308,0.000059310813,0.00009871866,0.0001053106,0.8314992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863935,0.00027784993,0.0012046742,0.0009278294,0.00020220435,0.000024061379,0.000034886387,0.00004319787,0.01089172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954224,0.0029406408,0.0001514512,0.00042615054,0.00073949766,0.00031983244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960658,0.0016776898,0.0006504883,0.0006664504,0.00070418493,0.0002354538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00391316,0.00026756115,0.00037032284,0.0005573372,0.0017805193,0.0037744646,0.00056744955,0.0017265601,0.011514763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009113968,0.00018424251,0.0004575381,0.00040409548,0.0070880977,0.0036428184,0.0023846568,0.0026889825,0.0013454139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041823812,0.000029045063,0.002037067,0.000069770635,0.000013529705,0.00026043414,0.009172992,0.00012323585,0.00093957107,0.9747449,0.004539094,0.0080285175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034967135,0.0000885839,0.010294334,0.00025222814,0.00003668454,0.0012446567,0.019771067,0.0012343572,0.0017890456,0.77141386,0.19378102,0.000059217116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050450995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054965966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011514763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013190177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052790344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038520694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544533727","doi":"10.1111/rati.12153","title":"Creativity and Meaning in Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Creativity; Skepticism; Superlative; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sketch; Characterization (materials science); Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11882104952699603,"score_gpt":0.29282561954975644,"score_spread":0.17400457002276043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544533727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11283075,0.011154049,0.051114216,0.04564692,0.0008015416,0.00004017518,0.00009378463,0.00008795694,0.77823055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714244,0.001582022,0.0033622151,0.0011451312,0.00020481508,0.000029090177,0.00002662463,0.000018507497,0.0064892564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832934,0.0009947757,0.000053673895,0.0001893488,0.00031295305,0.00011989653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977775,0.0012462235,0.00021848816,0.00030285487,0.00022057316,0.00023431506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020075552,0.00025219345,0.00023279978,0.0008886885,0.001688183,0.0061456948,0.00059279386,0.0012107488,0.0051589427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046907393,0.00009199722,0.00034320232,0.00067248615,0.023581155,0.005479483,0.0031632937,0.002990367,0.00056636374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008636147,0.0000067890574,0.00018452537,0.000024779589,0.0000028096006,0.000038715563,0.0024814357,0.00014967182,0.00012721613,0.9912793,0.00094193063,0.0047542276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003973322,0.000007377953,0.00033329715,0.00003361149,0.0000012878469,0.000058867598,0.000980623,0.00022153562,0.000098783814,0.9845334,0.01372195,0.000005126506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000514582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046074952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061456948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016727479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010127071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017258346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801806119","doi":"10.1111/rati.12198","title":"Intending, believing, and supposing at will","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.025340656221268236,"score_gpt":0.2620824951268216,"score_spread":0.23674183890555334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801806119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19041267,0.004037087,0.14041555,0.046766303,0.0009491082,0.000072252806,0.00014471392,0.00016582785,0.61703646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833245,0.00052255753,0.005880713,0.00089101074,0.00019533123,0.00003062627,0.000047295864,0.00002401093,0.0040759128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948837,0.0030027658,0.00017910823,0.0006602451,0.0008855013,0.0003887337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98932683,0.0067563504,0.0013487017,0.0010123814,0.00089838443,0.00065735297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054724733,0.0005111361,0.0004969922,0.0014359881,0.0026631067,0.006371481,0.0015776317,0.0047896085,0.010918408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013271365,0.00048243522,0.0011710882,0.00075071235,0.01835223,0.008097391,0.0041639083,0.0041731186,0.00082697003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026014768,0.00001665315,0.00032117747,0.000025932235,0.0000125213555,0.00009275158,0.00077153934,0.00018888147,0.00015703776,0.99616843,0.0006268394,0.0015922231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024108345,0.00003295497,0.00056853716,0.00006755978,0.000022210412,0.000193477,0.0008720023,0.0011957738,0.00032439642,0.987518,0.009160123,0.000020742022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000984618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008487332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010918408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016107069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079966633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036525726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888535219","doi":"10.1111/rati.12201","title":"One standard to rule them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Irrational number; Doxastic logic; Rational agent; Permissive; Rationality; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13433064359998698,"score_gpt":0.29985269255798613,"score_spread":0.16552204895799916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888535219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08659977,0.00486634,0.5410292,0.20267893,0.0031808252,0.00033071593,0.00035151793,0.0008876283,0.16007504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86813897,0.0011530948,0.11284122,0.009438191,0.0014067577,0.00024060637,0.00010879994,0.000270938,0.0064015137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632001,0.013671357,0.003560032,0.0063580414,0.012094479,0.0011159357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019671,0.051065322,0.01092061,0.015872931,0.017254923,0.0029191293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052038345,0.0008924527,0.0018835927,0.0029437223,0.0026926398,0.009652332,0.004211942,0.0069313906,0.0039282977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13463517,0.00094181433,0.0011239038,0.0011614714,0.028792705,0.020800788,0.0069001154,0.014519421,0.0016385457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029944025,0.00003853332,0.0008239863,0.00008903594,0.00006271442,0.00007103792,0.0005000483,0.0005576971,0.0003915318,0.98292875,0.0027183695,0.0117884185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025893936,0.00002046977,0.00024503394,0.00011368661,0.000024860525,0.00007795183,0.0002980432,0.0012486044,0.0007607879,0.9897181,0.007439379,0.000027160846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015689207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016832672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052038345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031094947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053671636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27520835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895800054","doi":"10.1111/rati.12213","title":"Attention norms in Siegel’s <i>The Rationality of Perception</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Epistemology; Perception; Norm (philosophy); Inference; Psychology; Subject (documents); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03381226890196056,"score_gpt":0.2832608242974247,"score_spread":0.24944855539546415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895800054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12490376,0.00611213,0.22163025,0.069911204,0.0006165874,0.000055324726,0.0001858235,0.00047677278,0.57610816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807915,0.00074328703,0.009897888,0.0021642596,0.00021031719,0.000048587102,0.000034521567,0.000082846025,0.0060266997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596775,0.0017454064,0.0002049831,0.00070040935,0.0010857378,0.00029574992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911806,0.0058694817,0.0005110523,0.0010786557,0.0011409934,0.00021918544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005749205,0.00031442058,0.00051481626,0.0013510514,0.0011535161,0.004965474,0.0009693954,0.0019273618,0.0029207685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013932154,0.00030743895,0.00062445836,0.00066427764,0.025355851,0.0070428695,0.002922013,0.0028476273,0.00048327612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008641253,0.0000038458415,0.00011418529,0.000013135159,0.0000040742702,0.000016889024,0.00091971224,0.0002721008,0.00010958443,0.9947602,0.0011754048,0.0026023423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030126414,0.0000022823215,0.00013415732,0.000016046693,0.0000026671387,0.000015809412,0.00013589143,0.0005523013,0.00015012462,0.99476373,0.004217814,0.00000615953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022116548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010426447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005749205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036845782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011880453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030405104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912804059","doi":"10.1111/rati.12228","title":"Excuses, exemptions, and derivative norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Excellence; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036950695592575036,"score_gpt":0.2428804490552681,"score_spread":0.20592975346269304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912804059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20209876,0.0026231052,0.22191112,0.025789017,0.0006130979,0.00011055581,0.00013301751,0.00017603666,0.5465452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974189,0.00030324297,0.01587424,0.0008690248,0.0001869177,0.000099134915,0.00004381413,0.00004550525,0.008389059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97938776,0.010819963,0.0014005131,0.0023044723,0.0052067735,0.0008804751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679976,0.019277342,0.0025319892,0.0048778527,0.003922668,0.0013925271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013677437,0.00042244003,0.00070562237,0.0020518582,0.0033791682,0.0062533165,0.0014335485,0.0033773344,0.004532959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03545492,0.0003735174,0.0005170977,0.0009922675,0.034008775,0.012948537,0.0069017685,0.0053864093,0.0005363321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005741545,0.0000041865424,0.00007924628,0.000006516753,0.0000010111703,0.000015290023,0.0002952142,0.000098089964,0.000059658258,0.9981128,0.00013422352,0.001188042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004948808,0.000006061845,0.00009084027,0.000020342093,0.0000017344437,0.000032064378,0.0002086625,0.0004627215,0.00014907459,0.99472505,0.0042923624,0.000006151917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011071734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001009146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013677437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025849778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022554486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07233405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942284900","doi":"10.1111/rati.12235","title":"Secondary self‐deception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Doxastic logic; Phenomenon; Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Psychology; Sketch; Self-knowledge; Lying; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028600403830870574,"score_gpt":0.23732171294123675,"score_spread":0.20872130911036618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942284900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06682458,0.0037160062,0.2030107,0.026123008,0.000951557,0.00014479211,0.00022373142,0.00021336369,0.6987922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674997,0.0006729452,0.0056734807,0.0016412768,0.00027272105,0.0000698803,0.00005286475,0.000043706288,0.0240734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552035,0.0019362725,0.000286094,0.00066941924,0.0012498611,0.00033791678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98871547,0.004354521,0.0014400457,0.0032066822,0.0019266175,0.0003566723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503762,0.00048435273,0.00037430503,0.0009040237,0.0017643126,0.0042229146,0.0011505476,0.0024748647,0.008371966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013133862,0.00022700701,0.00035848023,0.0004467342,0.020876111,0.006439115,0.0043288604,0.005985991,0.0012777093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008855791,0.000011146744,0.0002123048,0.000053846412,0.00000453628,0.000078239376,0.002952771,0.00015735366,0.00024330794,0.9913011,0.001037675,0.0039389473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008488143,0.000028966324,0.0005515039,0.00025390397,0.000008558143,0.00032457782,0.0013667255,0.0016487659,0.0016981153,0.94443226,0.04966306,0.000015145249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010853601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005995361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008371966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024989792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014394979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02800703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953730719","doi":"10.1111/rati.12242","title":"Naturalness constraints on best systems accounts of laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Interpretation (philosophy); Simplicity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.03967469576711394,"score_gpt":0.2243489413905601,"score_spread":0.18467424562344617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953730719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059705835,0.0031052958,0.2854541,0.042642254,0.00057833013,0.00013009283,0.0006779055,0.0005067873,0.60719943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677241,0.00056756224,0.018372819,0.002498093,0.0005446555,0.00016025247,0.00017849618,0.00018020246,0.009773931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900433,0.0045056003,0.0005328491,0.0016889686,0.0024749239,0.0007543442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763249,0.014518756,0.0011875402,0.0040211435,0.0031904988,0.0007572309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010486558,0.00054549857,0.0009921895,0.0031620236,0.0036516779,0.006771887,0.002438936,0.0030462588,0.0143905915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024204494,0.00067534094,0.0012978623,0.0019277115,0.023836387,0.016733332,0.006685893,0.00525381,0.0011522466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018958968,0.0000028243664,0.00004230968,0.000007412239,0.0000021071457,0.000009611407,0.0001042212,0.00022471904,0.000014328099,0.99890864,0.0003489069,0.00033288568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028866382,0.0000014116788,0.000030764273,0.000006825525,0.0000016400392,0.0000068566123,0.000033536548,0.0006079456,0.000024069375,0.99688345,0.0023978993,0.000002589783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042182812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034469145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0143905915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071660993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024105853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055458903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011611653","doi":"10.1111/rati.12264","title":"Medicalization and linguistic agency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicalization; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychiatry; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1134480235290356,"score_gpt":0.33128982943054736,"score_spread":0.21784180590151175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011611653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1504842,0.0040461714,0.031013241,0.079515435,0.0005471401,0.00008283189,0.0000464143,0.00009737492,0.7341671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905495,0.0003868394,0.0017169424,0.0018288319,0.00014107549,0.000026715656,0.000009622562,0.000017354258,0.0053230235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717972,0.020618916,0.0010571108,0.001965226,0.0028475712,0.0017140433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97608465,0.011887964,0.0048433132,0.002465832,0.0027674455,0.0019508215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017626347,0.00028858086,0.00040135818,0.0019186274,0.009045625,0.009712773,0.001197051,0.003465366,0.0041762907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233238,0.00027421745,0.00039760026,0.0010622345,0.08096836,0.0070961397,0.01095922,0.004581706,0.00048166368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018763221,0.000018314942,0.00060186116,0.00002428887,0.000004096906,0.00011576946,0.026331645,0.000072,0.00025490994,0.9662742,0.000865194,0.0054189935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025983029,0.00006495011,0.0016399635,0.00022093872,0.00002189535,0.00052419404,0.024569014,0.0006169004,0.0011229127,0.8526027,0.118540525,0.000050028844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017976116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014601634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046649035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049683517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09321815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011876580","doi":"10.1111/rati.12261","title":"The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Injustice; Deontic logic; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10974393688812152,"score_gpt":0.29286056849595526,"score_spread":0.18311663160783376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011876580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25794497,0.0012949428,0.4055645,0.01880424,0.0005384882,0.0001491562,0.00010604179,0.00036379963,0.31523386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917686,0.00006216113,0.006917723,0.00021296921,0.000049861068,0.000049053317,0.000010186019,0.000022258198,0.0009071231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9415068,0.041242108,0.0031100137,0.0044707595,0.007745369,0.001924933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91569436,0.0568918,0.005657414,0.011306775,0.008726316,0.0017233859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03014705,0.0003370802,0.0008296149,0.0017996082,0.0046889028,0.0090273535,0.0019220655,0.0037502581,0.0026942014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06641401,0.0005342387,0.00051574403,0.0010186087,0.045910683,0.014919842,0.008256349,0.0044956966,0.00041374814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022250118,0.0000080732125,0.00024665598,0.00002464447,0.0000038117012,0.000055870572,0.0060515986,0.00028885918,0.00019901281,0.99092263,0.00011764095,0.002058942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020771387,0.000023668521,0.0002403218,0.00006748298,0.0000104688625,0.00010064806,0.0040742783,0.003586131,0.0010342451,0.98286104,0.0079564,0.000024613151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026504893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010170387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03014705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045359936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035876266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15943474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248327916","doi":"10.1111/rati.12310","title":"Controlling hope","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015392799391580196,"score_gpt":0.2937104179092143,"score_spread":0.27831761851763415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248327916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27482143,0.0025812748,0.059732743,0.016763678,0.0004013893,0.0001422185,0.00021691006,0.00017748127,0.6451628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953434,0.00033142403,0.0008538564,0.00035275126,0.000048069815,0.00001920946,0.000018968216,0.000011187567,0.003021225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977616,0.0012053581,0.00007014252,0.0002450013,0.00040867116,0.00030913143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422836,0.0022977227,0.0012750586,0.0010883728,0.00046314966,0.0006472534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033115696,0.00030061576,0.00020482439,0.00064408995,0.0011799245,0.0034190544,0.000571234,0.0007024133,0.006349424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009660658,0.0001647684,0.00038951082,0.00034579556,0.009408478,0.0027755098,0.0029934125,0.0016853694,0.00037148973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104509614,0.0000785635,0.0069889654,0.00011064067,0.000042424617,0.0001417424,0.0073415767,0.0009475844,0.00091089035,0.9470841,0.0027587828,0.03349027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010112775,0.00032255656,0.01613016,0.0004032596,0.00010151784,0.00034013233,0.0072212564,0.0028143197,0.0023938513,0.8814399,0.0886616,0.000070384835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001387804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015771564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006349424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015347397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011125639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02124089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285494459","doi":"10.1111/rati.12347","title":"The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Worry; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Bayesian probability; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.08906752553776437,"score_gpt":0.3022916171046589,"score_spread":0.21322409156689454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285494459","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095588,0.0009554717,0.86020887,0.003105969,0.0001572759,0.00008163437,0.00021465169,0.000276501,0.039411623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8586184,0.00034343416,0.13717319,0.0002633231,0.00014224822,0.00011373584,0.00027270024,0.00011069788,0.0029622782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98281914,0.011129259,0.00074967527,0.002033409,0.0026820442,0.00058641034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95118326,0.038412403,0.003186215,0.0028546148,0.00330602,0.0010574927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02417527,0.00065145665,0.0013772491,0.003075465,0.001756993,0.006393035,0.002816952,0.0023751955,0.007909487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116292216,0.0006168093,0.0011530871,0.0022463761,0.0064664856,0.013069672,0.004958369,0.0035850706,0.0006445552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189412,0.000019678535,0.0007579852,0.00007742044,0.000029013621,0.000036850168,0.00032755735,0.017017018,0.00014623003,0.9703212,0.0006897007,0.010458357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020930001,0.000039651215,0.00020607447,0.000054514752,0.000011760277,0.000048791226,0.00017256437,0.098851725,0.00026033315,0.8978824,0.0024367329,0.000014591165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028875703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011094803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02417527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050470945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013199138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12785256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366986237","doi":"10.1111/rati.12377","title":"Luck egalitarianism and non‐overlapping generations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Intuition; Positive economics; Skepticism; Epistemology; Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07122119246806932,"score_gpt":0.35062988984591076,"score_spread":0.27940869737784146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366986237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2575953,0.0027464854,0.08216446,0.03326704,0.00030273796,0.0000633108,0.0000628011,0.000048006426,0.62375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996603,0.00020507327,0.0024263524,0.0011783917,0.000053663494,0.00002427506,0.000007364435,0.000012169792,0.0061266585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504757,0.0025145249,0.000117028394,0.0008756476,0.000709028,0.00073627755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952165,0.0022540707,0.0005841543,0.0011834169,0.00045459653,0.00030728374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00712721,0.00029042378,0.00045216884,0.0007152982,0.0031740763,0.0027247209,0.000947526,0.0022856114,0.0052205883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080276,0.000274035,0.0005238094,0.0005856407,0.021128904,0.0046168966,0.0044421777,0.003698424,0.0003832578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004846655,0.000004035094,0.00013751519,0.000003830478,0.0000024507322,0.000016587823,0.0005947638,0.00020710581,0.000026833923,0.9977452,0.00015587731,0.0011010222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006248031,0.000006999091,0.00034735605,0.000017023607,0.0000041130866,0.00003323237,0.00025233568,0.00051511417,0.00009572642,0.9927194,0.005997921,0.0000045395823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028463763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031475632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00712721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004732673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018614827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037692726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845283","doi":"10.1111/rati.12446","title":"The Motive of Duty, Emotional Motives, and the Kantian Criterion of Summonability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Social psychology; Psychology; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01497038065176664,"score_gpt":0.24603274913944248,"score_spread":0.23106236848767583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11777414,0.0051612076,0.08651698,0.036848214,0.00065879396,0.00009651601,0.00011693773,0.00009942621,0.7527278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830809,0.00036681883,0.004860826,0.0007754743,0.0001630623,0.000060187263,0.000019817257,0.000023856534,0.010649149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532324,0.0026992918,0.00018901787,0.00034515624,0.0010195976,0.00042373242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964097,0.0017458046,0.00042995348,0.0003662474,0.0006249108,0.00042330645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055350885,0.0004826728,0.0004295533,0.0016907573,0.0022667935,0.0042888597,0.0008602389,0.0024261074,0.0051680645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005295519,0.0002467433,0.00055314123,0.00060975895,0.027352534,0.0046447176,0.0041275597,0.0029791766,0.0005527505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036999961,0.000004141247,0.00007244299,0.000007789641,0.0000015619597,0.000013131093,0.00021659807,0.0000736347,0.000039448638,0.9985482,0.00027359836,0.00074580073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007614935,0.0000076161987,0.00023787416,0.000027960332,0.0000023316115,0.00003718725,0.00020349385,0.00040812517,0.00007749956,0.99279094,0.006193609,0.000005848766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075250294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005151579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055350885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032825898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013299856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029272676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}