{"meta":{"query_hash":"7dee6eed0035","filters":{"venue":"Ratio"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7dee6eed0035","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ratio"},"results":[{"id":"W1486718986","doi":"10.1111/rati.12000","title":"Laws of Nature Don't <i>Have</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses, They <i>Are</i> Ceteris Paribus Clauses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.02035335800772086,"score_gpt":0.3033767068206914,"score_spread":0.28302334881297053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486718986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76482195,0.0027190656,0.0007733238,0.0025801726,0.0034199664,0.0005484406,0.0005375727,0.00021489298,0.22438462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962686,0.000057612873,0.00021512971,0.0023043312,0.0007245692,0.00004740276,0.00003193521,0.000030181012,0.0003202806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976116,0.00031502856,0.0004720425,0.00044323129,0.00038705659,0.0007710511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982389,0.00027577387,0.0002849124,0.0008069219,0.000096603624,0.0002968803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005666442,0.00029296282,0.00042967507,0.000058962007,0.00017025966,0.000055107743,0.000583948,0.00048811446,0.0014195786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014161928,0.00023482874,0.00015694162,0.00024307545,0.00042160664,0.0003633462,0.00013910397,0.0005686456,0.00032669964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002814302,0.00077996706,0.08109296,0.00004441205,0.00013053234,0.000028308901,0.0039819297,0.0000041815756,0.0096272435,0.88656807,0.015624553,0.0018363891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004032705,0.0010843668,0.23860665,0.00028712326,0.00043647276,0.00027506013,0.0022740376,0.000061999235,0.05569708,0.22593746,0.4687429,0.002564146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001863717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010916444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66063064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038031627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028111139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522518042","doi":"10.1111/rati.12009","title":"Freak Observers and the Simulation Argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"FREAK; Argument (complex analysis); Observer (physics); Epistemology; Observable; sort; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Physics","score_opus":0.015037447379171821,"score_gpt":0.24500555816499692,"score_spread":0.2299681107858251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522518042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98596954,0.000013608838,0.003458782,0.0022887336,0.00012788668,0.00025384285,0.0000011420999,0.000008794005,0.007877655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990005,4.6673998e-7,0.00005283926,0.0000954719,0.00016228262,0.000017391187,0.000003346788,0.0000015438699,0.0006661864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997467,0.00001679095,0.000055397784,0.000060944774,0.00005541257,0.00006480252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998296,0.000043940916,0.000022651602,0.00006833333,0.000012736744,0.000022770868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000070805596,0.000034038952,0.000040223214,0.0000056072154,0.000083163024,0.00010014018,0.00003840282,0.000006636744,0.00035692056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003681073,0.000019727755,0.000016627479,0.00003480566,0.000040641975,0.00016730333,0.000010533173,0.000023833685,0.00010768994],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978617,0.000094127885,0.21589221,0.0000063860048,0.00010101907,3.1086026e-7,0.0047774636,0.058614142,0.004178767,0.63379216,0.01705504,0.065418564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060323956,0.000088818364,0.13794604,0.000021101532,0.000056339104,2.5370835e-7,0.0048888386,0.707266,0.004256929,0.10993227,0.029051138,0.00045991447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007301172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049084915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64865184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002830919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010493409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39080298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542702755","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00543.x","title":"SELF‐KNOWLEDGE AND MORAL STUPIDITY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Stupidity; Moral disengagement; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Morality; Moral psychology; Psychology; Rationalization (economics); Moral responsibility; Harm; Social psychology; Moral authority; Moral reasoning; Self-deception; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20179518758569248,"score_gpt":0.5388453456551577,"score_spread":0.33705015806946526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542702755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27086994,0.0025780234,0.0026784022,0.010593298,0.0048551713,0.0008506241,0.0000061315723,0.00032715788,0.70724124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900501,0.000108241016,0.0030539792,0.0019363957,0.0014239667,0.00003500367,0.000003259822,0.000010752032,0.0033783214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775743,0.0015196145,0.0001885285,0.000094762654,0.00014940879,0.0002902732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593925,0.0035315303,0.000073141666,0.00016891074,0.00008868298,0.00019850714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004093421,0.000060756876,0.00009936999,0.000019277391,0.00073263556,0.000004465337,0.0000650848,0.00019735874,0.0005780919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039029357,0.00005076901,0.000010972851,0.000065732864,0.00006450481,0.0002881333,0.000103197686,0.0017909325,0.0015220671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017219347,0.00029016583,0.3224661,0.00051785226,0.00003109176,0.0000015636447,0.04461752,1.0253894e-7,0.00016173444,0.49543738,0.13407327,0.0023859811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072068686,0.00004208309,0.13888574,0.00006540121,0.00005233779,0.0000030525177,0.0032735593,0.00042609865,0.00007467892,0.012226915,0.8440474,0.00018200088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026162532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005870649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71918017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005707606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014880626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572252090","doi":"10.1111/rati.12062","title":"Some Ontological Consequences of Atomism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Atomism; Epistemology; Naturalism; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Metaphysics; Motion (physics); Ontology; Physicalism; Physics; Classical mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0353723973225685,"score_gpt":0.31718453649353173,"score_spread":0.28181213917096326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572252090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4570691,0.00010754612,0.0020156766,0.0025974787,0.00035652335,0.00007170387,0.0000025428983,0.000028945986,0.5377505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905694,0.0000014126829,0.00013913939,0.0004765098,0.000108570595,0.000005341683,4.7621586e-7,0.0000011301837,0.0002104867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999526,0.00009403243,0.00009904239,0.00010979309,0.000071261,0.00009983001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996491,0.00015182137,0.00003257077,0.00012102922,0.000012641559,0.000032852608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002094465,0.000036085046,0.000083033054,0.000011209908,0.000027465498,0.0000050958033,0.00012771737,0.000045702687,0.0006703388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009487752,0.000025178168,0.0000239472,0.000046417717,0.00054700056,0.00003948479,0.000011757999,0.00004557208,0.00023348586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010388379,0.000026041547,0.00019960749,7.9285866e-7,0.000002955485,0.0000014584193,0.00012682407,6.932887e-7,0.003275348,0.9952234,0.00009696705,0.0010355152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119983524,0.00010035826,0.0035901195,0.0000022597426,0.000002609473,0.000004739441,0.0000127455405,0.000052532512,0.004052156,0.99078816,0.0012355987,0.000038734175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001497717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015620498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54198784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033060012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007783461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73397404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632817046","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00382.x","title":"THE FABRICATION METAPHOR","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Epistemology; Commit; Philosophy; Perception; Realism; Process (computing); Cognitive science; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.025597666178316318,"score_gpt":0.24086090155487444,"score_spread":0.21526323537655812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1632817046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10051034,0.004891011,0.28314152,0.0075275567,0.005159992,0.00056960154,0.0000031606444,0.0011308563,0.597066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382657,0.00027225283,0.00046622925,0.000094062474,0.00009900872,0.000016535983,0.0000023409618,0.0000055307905,0.0052174786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998156,0.000014360625,0.00005126789,0.000027420303,0.000045620476,0.00004574631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997657,0.00009030279,0.00000862973,0.00009736646,0.000022619879,0.000015391306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000699579,0.000024990137,0.00001971662,0.000009159822,0.00011321633,0.00001754151,0.00004270968,0.000010373359,0.00007134205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061551385,0.000018445211,0.000009676621,0.00007058805,0.000008963902,0.000093895374,0.0000014610837,0.00003739133,0.00041222974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000624295,0.000029637866,0.00041537432,0.000008263027,0.00006238004,0.0000017324546,0.003134709,0.0033432576,0.012169588,0.021081114,0.906814,0.052933726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000324665,0.0000028477978,0.0060052485,3.8610006e-7,0.0000040139175,0.000008076624,0.00005938341,0.007878266,0.0040006135,0.000111680645,0.98185766,0.000039367435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023700131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002269647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000120037985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012858403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5298517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903656838","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00498.x","title":"DOES PERCEPTION OUTSTRIP OUR CONCEPTS IN FINENESS OF GRAIN?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fineness; Perception; Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04865859430877825,"score_gpt":0.3430707012506878,"score_spread":0.29441210694190956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903656838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8217081,0.000010324077,0.0022600777,0.0005595481,0.0007408063,0.00012211509,0.000007993559,0.000018808445,0.17457224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933416,0.000001077572,0.000113122864,0.000096205855,0.00005537858,0.000009474517,0.000001637397,0.000002412608,0.00038654584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950194,0.00007388976,0.0001270603,0.00012493947,0.000065445456,0.000106692954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997711,0.000016444517,0.00003435909,0.00013012161,0.000018379815,0.000029591914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001719987,0.0000445659,0.000079248726,0.000029656509,0.000015248578,0.0000028076524,0.00011295011,0.000048131908,0.0011277592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034144294,0.00002734953,0.000022738173,0.00010657163,0.00008818559,0.000056813897,0.00001275827,0.00005375637,0.00011813078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004798594,0.00012707809,0.010688138,0.000004471723,0.0000035136843,0.0000053035715,0.010111534,6.834805e-7,0.0029811545,0.97252595,0.00007143125,0.0034327775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005864374,0.00015710235,0.489512,0.000017952634,0.000006291369,0.0000020317843,0.0026352892,0.00006231939,0.0029708587,0.50372237,0.00019693282,0.00013037905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011315881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003344064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47882387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000082360975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008271783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908302690","doi":"10.1111/rati.12097","title":"Epistemic Value Monism and the Swamping Problem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Premise; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08529585516567487,"score_gpt":0.26259036325555307,"score_spread":0.1772945080898782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908302690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13348024,0.004657251,0.001531052,0.03399073,0.0021849652,0.0009797852,0.000016520975,0.000205207,0.82295424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776903,0.000040048697,0.00019024014,0.0011717404,0.0007249341,0.000025830124,0.00000535576,0.000011091487,0.020140495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00012838349,0.00014625012,0.000110040564,0.00010201539,0.00011484462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.00013299655,0.00006447024,0.0001405166,0.00008956252,0.00004080044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006456402,0.00007597123,0.00013476454,0.000015943458,0.00026422937,0.00013810727,0.00007956716,0.000034711546,0.000016873299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051952782,0.00004751675,0.000034934776,0.000011020084,0.0005748248,0.00012053598,0.000029112658,0.00014420929,0.000047282407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000930428,0.0000068262493,0.000031588814,0.000018678205,0.000015996982,6.943896e-7,0.066095054,0.0000114392515,0.00001716787,0.9316687,0.0018106694,0.0003138591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013193977,0.000058885133,0.0000344038,0.00003726912,0.000055887733,0.00000894735,0.010572619,0.0009168134,0.00013227559,0.68569833,0.30099532,0.00016986128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034045035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003621075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013146034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052424482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2117966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971691221","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00174","title":"Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self‐Sufficiency","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Illusion; Passion; Narcissism; Psychology; Flourishing; Social psychology; Allegation; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03650694236829226,"score_gpt":0.2957230461562005,"score_spread":0.2592161037879082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971691221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97347635,0.0007288796,0.00016462257,0.00025009122,0.0001677465,0.00010428125,0.000020497066,0.000020446352,0.025067074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733555,0.000041221607,0.00061058876,0.00003866694,0.000019800702,0.0000066903813,0.0000024504516,0.000005736638,0.0019392942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952215,0.00002314042,0.0001756099,0.00011225656,0.00007848542,0.00008836552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999624,0.00002331604,0.00007177944,0.00019893082,0.00005002535,0.000031946012],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006674836,0.00005370143,0.000111630245,0.00006334647,0.00005038486,0.0000038641165,0.000060470928,0.00005487932,0.0021983732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009284199,0.000046551075,0.000030967938,0.000115108436,0.00006511337,0.00003735559,0.000022653654,0.000051427163,0.00003559769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295451,0.010171627,0.14640662,0.00016826372,0.00016970129,0.00006475294,0.09507179,0.000014681129,0.13662796,0.40241158,0.08309948,0.1257406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015170564,0.0008691496,0.9378812,0.000059479487,0.00018955521,0.000059937644,0.0025053052,0.0005242598,0.0021148738,0.00063877954,0.053266406,0.000374026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067772286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012461726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7914746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007641327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064553888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983495082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9329.00221","title":"Shareability and Objectivity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Metaphysics; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03683054083108771,"score_gpt":0.21834480078687965,"score_spread":0.18151425995579196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983495082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14248435,0.00008046894,0.000062740466,0.00061189255,0.00018433417,0.00007440074,0.000013481545,0.000041035924,0.8564473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666035,0.000001450946,0.000024440935,0.00015876158,0.00017997489,0.0000043517043,0.0000016078826,0.0000028270151,0.0029662086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997264,0.00003060036,0.000052174033,0.000090841495,0.00004125006,0.000058708785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982035,0.00004746591,0.000011532025,0.00007570073,0.000017791845,0.000027132195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007044003,0.00004163672,0.000055055974,0.0000083944615,0.00014747973,0.00005990656,0.000016759755,0.000012771349,0.0013255847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006185644,0.000033407,0.00001818619,0.000008871935,0.00009929827,0.0001057802,0.000006222983,0.00004670853,0.000040636674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019282058,0.000029189217,0.0001872257,0.0000050690905,0.0000031544866,4.7958446e-7,0.001507109,1.3326955e-7,0.000024701973,0.99690354,0.0005745144,0.00076297845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012853544,0.00003157999,0.0010574479,0.0000029583366,0.000005877023,0.0000010760574,0.00014071191,0.000022629922,0.0003810847,0.38660952,0.61153764,0.00008093952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014788118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025113393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85417604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069636094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000830504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042248626","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2009.00434.x","title":"WHAT IS NATURAL ABOUT FOOT'S ETHICAL NATURALISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Creatures; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Foot (prosody); Function (biology); Philosophy; History; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.03306659182887726,"score_gpt":0.29925118481373075,"score_spread":0.2661845929848535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042248626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4789615,0.0044677993,0.00007724218,0.4140775,0.020753607,0.00037851147,0.0000075247167,0.00031566175,0.080960676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94428307,0.000050598228,0.000050186987,0.024400946,0.0008709017,0.0000025373997,0.000012188267,0.0000025621378,0.030327002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993778,0.000027300977,0.00011963982,0.0001369758,0.00019860259,0.00013969933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996644,0.00002516001,0.000035363475,0.000116005125,0.00011406719,0.00004497384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013032899,0.00006823922,0.00006568877,0.000029340265,0.00033515718,0.0006637494,0.000108084016,0.000060934806,0.001799636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031219464,0.000053213716,0.000044585617,0.000036710488,0.00011009827,0.00077315484,0.0000059330446,0.00028023554,0.00026905112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037106745,0.000022923496,0.000010221869,0.000002079964,0.000002564728,4.944102e-7,0.06534259,9.932795e-7,0.00023756144,0.810153,0.11468633,0.00953752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016411563,0.00006424969,0.0043309187,0.00003314754,0.000006946955,0.0000034919206,0.00973223,0.0012868008,0.00045202934,0.012331108,0.9713888,0.0002061348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000245235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021138604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8567025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031133906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036090893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065190707","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00326.x","title":"UNDERDETERMINATION AND THE ARGUMENT FROM INDIRECT CONFIRMATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0314890652546003,"score_gpt":0.230720348990048,"score_spread":0.1992312837354477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065190707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7532151,0.0006783305,0.0012233732,0.0049660266,0.0008351091,0.0003721027,0.0000325702,0.000070256465,0.23860717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951286,0.000011755239,0.000028703033,0.00034583046,0.00048732123,0.000013199977,0.00004760357,0.000003811582,0.003933205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995643,0.000104163846,0.00011354424,0.00006996293,0.000095217,0.00005280718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964553,0.00015332077,0.000065792505,0.00007310677,0.000054831402,0.0000074135337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025252,0.000049286868,0.000077885314,0.000016112563,0.00021801113,0.0001201468,0.00003192598,0.00002439724,0.00011596403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014402203,0.000032913198,0.00002107966,0.000006928754,0.00024856857,0.00010340078,0.000007534724,0.00005885179,0.000023981767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062640283,0.000013311007,0.000070159076,0.000004994918,0.00001281389,2.1590895e-7,0.0167157,0.000008075133,0.00006322903,0.98016787,0.0011682353,0.0017691118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023732663,0.00004032222,0.006581761,0.000023665394,0.0001656734,0.0000013852776,0.0047204234,0.004489779,0.002493795,0.7555738,0.22331002,0.00022607067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092133286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035728468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24191351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011614898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012260293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19937323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103169171","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2006.00320.x","title":"NATURAL GOODNESS AND NATURAL EVIL","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Natural (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Action (physics); Function (biology); Morality; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.01787471168403942,"score_gpt":0.22444757767453527,"score_spread":0.20657286599049585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103169171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52919424,0.0040977234,0.000016027107,0.008301891,0.0019374564,0.00014948596,0.000020686712,0.00013401847,0.45614848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913189,0.000006035268,0.000009318176,0.00066053757,0.0011422344,0.0000033604526,0.00001633218,0.000006786013,0.0068365326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.000020881986,0.00009185476,0.000101160236,0.000091968046,0.00009952119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997792,0.000058607773,0.000024070041,0.000071356146,0.000047018977,0.000019718045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008322637,0.000069384696,0.000076852826,0.000021469845,0.00020953002,0.00014045948,0.00005081636,0.000026616046,0.0002014138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015979007,0.000052138897,0.000026612886,0.000011226952,0.00019546352,0.00013403341,0.000021535368,0.00017934936,0.000033476364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055350365,0.000011704799,0.000013464812,0.000008676158,0.0000046441264,0.0000023981086,0.0007988077,5.06309e-7,0.00019842428,0.9982725,0.00030951345,0.00037382857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019673975,0.000016515238,0.00051668944,0.000012063377,0.00000804267,0.0000029665368,0.00012555382,0.00039538776,0.00015139577,0.8991334,0.09931476,0.00012650322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001132604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063011696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46212462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072398457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011713793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110504366","doi":"10.1111/rati.12018","title":"Do<i>a Posteriori</i>Physicalists Get Our Phenomenal Concepts Wrong?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Epistemology; A priori and a posteriori; Dualism; Philosophy; Property (philosophy); Metaphysics","score_opus":0.02171918970681241,"score_gpt":0.331893481330093,"score_spread":0.3101742916232806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110504366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4196382,0.00006929636,0.0008110915,0.0054064803,0.0009293219,0.00028860467,0.00001577663,0.00008043024,0.5727608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595237,6.647484e-7,0.0000993044,0.001721783,0.0005480863,0.00004942448,0.000005267294,0.000008410672,0.0016146993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990035,0.000094782314,0.00015458264,0.00027862098,0.00016780428,0.00030070046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.00004638282,0.000047510835,0.0002952679,0.00004420279,0.00015510037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105504,0.00010933352,0.00013063411,0.000018740331,0.00008720911,0.00008200562,0.00025245702,0.000056630208,0.0029328787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022715376,0.00008724961,0.00004876705,0.000120452634,0.00014312808,0.0001812511,0.00004877704,0.00011686665,0.0064504608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012966529,0.00008519569,0.00022572778,0.0000021571143,0.000012924961,0.0000065348163,0.0011315146,9.980421e-7,0.0056733894,0.9852287,0.00356173,0.004058169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012535165,0.00048111693,0.04816207,0.000022465416,0.000023588682,0.000027942448,0.0009098729,0.00024377646,0.0016156901,0.9318045,0.01484149,0.0006140123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004906569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015310832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57631415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020681466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016222033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99797857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143134544","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2007.00379.x","title":"RULE‐FOLLOWING WITHOUT REASONS: WITTGENSTEIN'S QUIETISM AND THE CONSTITUTIVE QUESTION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Epistemology; Objectivity (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.008774348466961375,"score_gpt":0.2528014911494923,"score_spread":0.24402714268253092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143134544","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042271473,0.0017611625,0.85396016,0.0007073128,0.00082364044,0.00033591047,5.851641e-7,0.00019263351,0.09994715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881454,0.000032721586,0.010518706,0.00029102268,0.00013396777,0.0000094979905,0.0000013445555,0.000004677628,0.0008626385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905556,0.000113404385,0.0001621357,0.00026607845,0.00018146093,0.00022135579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.00022425389,0.000077087236,0.00029198354,0.000064198764,0.00007481144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013082457,0.0001182869,0.00015447548,0.000044432923,0.00031954775,0.00019009014,0.00026570432,0.000062454135,0.000003850068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024753058,0.00007705696,0.000055920136,0.00018801294,0.00023382365,0.0003867521,0.00010710742,0.00012115914,0.000042242573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015940148,0.000013316105,0.0042536366,0.0000032793057,0.000020615324,0.000020946969,0.0023191234,0.000004036614,0.0002097635,0.9801962,0.00020041257,0.01274275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02719413,0.00090675056,0.20760043,0.0012457282,0.0005045512,0.0015182988,0.0030853185,0.1131158,0.024901353,0.5347599,0.08117505,0.00399269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007240585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009929614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035888283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000846818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31422916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146077072","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00497.x","title":"ON THE IMMORALITY OF THREATENING","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immorality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Morality","score_opus":0.2677034102949305,"score_gpt":0.260815378152138,"score_spread":0.006888032142792488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146077072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45079005,0.000046083715,0.00022547765,0.0013361363,0.00038885712,0.00013356411,0.000011300002,0.000037138605,0.5470314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961629,0.0000024669484,0.000021631507,0.00016305092,0.0001101077,0.0000045221336,0.0000034643676,0.0000031151972,0.0035287202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997274,0.00002634016,0.00008931596,0.000050913495,0.00006225454,0.000043731936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970394,0.00005355,0.000048388833,0.00012907815,0.000057647823,0.000007406737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017897978,0.00003195163,0.00004250031,0.000011144703,0.00014479467,0.000018938887,0.000058534388,0.000014739649,0.0017533109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031870488,0.00001926246,0.00002180259,0.0000072716075,0.00012445325,0.00005272113,0.0000053553886,0.000056332286,0.00007749968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061465093,0.000016077582,0.000062241226,0.0000051056795,0.0000047838657,8.187248e-8,0.058824353,6.31493e-7,0.00009902574,0.93940425,0.0013764749,0.00020080464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053689064,0.00040161962,0.02157462,0.00013218951,0.00011753814,0.0000011209321,0.044642966,0.0007698857,0.06870217,0.78056467,0.082065694,0.0004906626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003672913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034083024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54537284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000037752673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009577903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169118977","doi":"10.1111/rati.12058","title":"Hypocrisy and the Nature of Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Notice; Disposition; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Inscribed figure; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014673596263842112,"score_gpt":0.22069302299450422,"score_spread":0.2060194267306621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169118977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09636531,0.0020114328,0.00010029848,0.04140725,0.0009569356,0.000274524,0.000043246626,0.00004886553,0.8587921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941987,0.000020439862,0.00001566568,0.0022320743,0.000837578,0.0000035850203,0.0000037497246,0.0000038282737,0.0026844032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996118,0.000055049728,0.00010300438,0.00006593672,0.00008548956,0.00007870138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996193,0.00019640177,0.000025517993,0.00009934259,0.000030535317,0.000028902847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011128602,0.000050487775,0.00009875046,0.000009836986,0.00010592458,0.000032053595,0.00006368044,0.00003035899,0.0004313753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072226576,0.00002621383,0.000038183796,0.000009470018,0.00035236712,0.000038148915,0.00002188771,0.00012268584,0.000020580052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016393835,0.000015341424,0.000013910241,0.000010236699,0.00000892562,8.8276494e-8,0.0010901487,1.9482563e-7,0.000007688808,0.99679,0.0015170377,0.0005300388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039426464,0.000029409328,0.00012522867,0.000007774969,0.000014242888,7.1843783e-7,0.00006798483,0.000142124,0.00013178859,0.39730263,0.6017424,0.000041442876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019957613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014658287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89783335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001712587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003023046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47232568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222931779","doi":"10.1111/rati.12128","title":"Subject‐Relative Reasons for Love","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy of love; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10743343240990283,"score_gpt":0.3829748444764652,"score_spread":0.27554141206656235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222931779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46864122,0.00043067083,0.07773012,0.0038972674,0.0025949893,0.0012016083,0.00014847933,0.00013266678,0.44522297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956574,5.248767e-7,0.0022777922,0.00014415594,0.0001574524,0.000050049373,0.000032657244,0.000011804108,0.10166817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960995,0.000028615246,0.0000803095,0.00011918927,0.00004571074,0.00011624637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996362,0.000040462484,0.00002852046,0.00015189615,0.000078294666,0.00006468005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108791646,0.000052185653,0.00006732196,0.00002568666,0.000024807585,0.000010829644,0.000046214343,0.000056234232,0.0005537495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041783216,0.000046798854,0.00003728689,0.00005971157,0.00002181685,0.00006460861,0.000007397668,0.000049465252,0.0015925156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008221103,0.00024274449,0.00988916,0.0000027289248,0.000044503588,0.000009134773,0.008357054,0.0000055312553,0.00047922623,0.53038925,0.44526094,0.00523752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006754951,0.0018840915,0.14368781,0.000029684948,0.000278399,0.000059878384,0.008586658,0.00022337178,0.0020106265,0.024791297,0.81092083,0.000772383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005426026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054301767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50559795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002567811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032371703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544533727","doi":"10.1111/rati.12153","title":"Creativity and Meaning in Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Creativity; Skepticism; Superlative; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sketch; Characterization (materials science); Meaning of life; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11882104952699603,"score_gpt":0.29282561954975644,"score_spread":0.17400457002276043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544533727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798528,0.000006721997,0.00038650242,0.0062125297,0.00006142127,0.000032202646,0.0000013500219,0.000012289178,0.013434209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980467,0.000017194032,0.000050945007,0.0011143716,0.000023867662,0.0000027674173,6.5038215e-8,0.0000013988688,0.00074269937],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996956,0.000032593838,0.000046924033,0.000112418806,0.000049549253,0.00006294038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998358,0.00008214654,0.0000116515275,0.000039464634,0.000002510049,0.000028458177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000611636,0.00002729784,0.000036105124,0.000018401684,0.000025917756,0.000005023574,0.000028626013,0.000013823069,0.00007095534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017900816,0.00001705763,0.00000535859,0.000029649947,0.000041811003,0.00008439171,0.00001372048,0.00002071283,0.00005652743],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027655718,0.0000627685,0.046929467,0.000002721088,9.338083e-7,0.000013497767,0.0001883347,0.0000029483595,0.8813593,0.05789857,0.0014645284,0.012049306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016935248,0.0001444669,0.7573367,0.00007158117,0.000002671374,0.000027855493,0.000022301312,0.0002557107,0.19450565,0.039176095,0.0065514967,0.00021197609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004699116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000099194285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074309455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061195374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07769113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801806119","doi":"10.1111/rati.12198","title":"Intending, believing, and supposing at will","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.025340656221268236,"score_gpt":0.2620824951268216,"score_spread":0.23674183890555334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801806119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97396797,0.00005970798,0.00044448336,0.00055881334,0.00038736436,0.0000693277,0.0000033174772,0.000060788007,0.024448257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919626,0.00002151527,0.00013281088,0.00073973427,0.0001936928,0.0000018459564,5.8111596e-7,0.0000066672746,0.006940528],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950254,0.000021231219,0.00007695071,0.00018482147,0.0000803476,0.0001340813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997786,0.000032354536,0.000026369771,0.00010583194,0.000012806588,0.000044007254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004509015,0.000057366342,0.00005141512,0.000025812307,0.00023801967,0.000043437878,0.00007465271,0.000021008535,0.00040584416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712574,0.000047472255,0.000013137807,0.00007195618,0.00014436338,0.00019089642,0.00008241203,0.00003793838,0.00018866456],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048331817,0.000010082486,0.0037745887,0.000005568122,7.663571e-7,0.0000071229088,0.00062730967,2.5231913e-7,0.98017216,0.006265646,0.0058949934,0.0032367012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017812954,0.0001454223,0.0036656277,0.000025773916,0.000004837655,0.00005850557,0.00001809058,0.001377939,0.8824633,0.00090553286,0.111012906,0.00014394497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000815217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032448424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10511792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017219776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006910652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4443709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888535219","doi":"10.1111/rati.12201","title":"One standard to rule them all?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Irrational number; Doxastic logic; Rational agent; Permissive; Rationality; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13433064359998698,"score_gpt":0.29985269255798613,"score_spread":0.16552204895799916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888535219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1315742,0.000055225824,0.002255502,0.009065757,0.0017507691,0.00024419767,0.000070482725,0.00014193529,0.85484195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393157,0.000007538114,0.0007397109,0.006833242,0.0032960817,0.000013290148,0.000013265598,0.000017082564,0.049764104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994651,0.000031960408,0.00011493829,0.00012099368,0.0001236416,0.0001433856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995319,0.00003844163,0.000031672196,0.00017424954,0.00017338275,0.00005031936],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001849009,0.000065608605,0.00011840354,0.00001947693,0.00021127034,0.00009134096,0.00009054736,0.00003239205,0.002066657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003311699,0.00005778071,0.00003631811,0.000013665326,0.00022499412,0.000086920816,0.000023937946,0.000080192454,0.001747742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020742418,0.000028402155,0.000028857095,0.000010252104,0.000033566695,6.688456e-7,0.049173318,3.7569018e-7,0.00042231474,0.9076057,0.040647164,0.0020286138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012264535,0.00015672274,0.000059068905,0.000009448585,0.000016203201,3.0760083e-7,0.0009434309,0.0000065953363,0.0029649946,0.038284894,0.95733815,0.00009754705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007479755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001486754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.916691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017540924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036779547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895800054","doi":"10.1111/rati.12213","title":"Attention norms in Siegel’s <i>The Rationality of Perception</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Epistemology; Perception; Norm (philosophy); Inference; Psychology; Subject (documents); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03381226890196056,"score_gpt":0.2832608242974247,"score_spread":0.24944855539546415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895800054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99259883,0.0000022742363,0.004020839,0.00071707397,0.00015733181,0.00010038121,0.000003247701,0.000012708241,0.0023872978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984272,0.0000036050287,0.000049546936,0.00024477657,0.00011560198,0.0000083381565,0.0000031169402,0.000002975079,0.0011448014],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994114,0.00007278597,0.00015902275,0.00012904534,0.0001517143,0.000076049386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997324,0.000039994033,0.00005728211,0.00012382216,0.00003408288,0.000012442887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021865386,0.000041684696,0.000050104158,0.000029498195,0.00009767776,0.000018773015,0.000076990975,0.00002330485,0.00036541958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011260048,0.000029668801,0.000028370334,0.0001578101,0.00010840046,0.00012412854,0.000014970415,0.00004916953,0.00016729611],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011141542,0.000048353766,0.010580455,0.000007478722,6.083473e-7,3.2940125e-7,0.00040679495,0.000024598528,0.9841038,0.0027579563,0.0006455205,0.0014129541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056398555,0.00011210425,0.74925524,0.00003363998,0.000006535638,0.000009087109,0.0002670119,0.006839925,0.23779748,0.0028828136,0.0020984237,0.00013376151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001955788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080112986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7463063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017038376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017604338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4001088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912804059","doi":"10.1111/rati.12228","title":"Excuses, exemptions, and derivative norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Excellence; Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036950695592575036,"score_gpt":0.2428804490552681,"score_spread":0.20592975346269304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912804059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80676705,0.00045659023,0.0002595599,0.0012153595,0.00089522725,0.00024506997,0.000020848911,0.00007008188,0.1900702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612351,0.00004917542,0.00010048008,0.00068193546,0.00032666294,0.000008519792,0.000016466869,0.000008267027,0.03757336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996086,0.000027833054,0.00009670428,0.00011257504,0.00006182572,0.000092496426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996898,0.00006933879,0.00004058269,0.000115480645,0.00006023744,0.000024570545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092784394,0.000065536085,0.00010354427,0.000024356023,0.00014260525,0.00006947725,0.000042281237,0.00003164975,0.0007091477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001605687,0.00005257956,0.000023828617,0.000010415049,0.00016726529,0.00023809861,0.000017765891,0.00009568002,0.00032702796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035897576,0.000018110131,0.001523447,0.000028033654,0.00001867724,5.515445e-7,0.02563212,0.0000011205526,0.00029889998,0.9698401,0.0020734004,0.0005619476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004693621,0.00014009587,0.0042729643,0.00003071289,0.00002689224,0.0000024356698,0.008886294,0.00007893592,0.000589198,0.053050634,0.9321902,0.0002622981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092705566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051668496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007936337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021803064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942284900","doi":"10.1111/rati.12235","title":"Secondary self‐deception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Doxastic logic; Phenomenon; Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Psychology; Sketch; Self-knowledge; Lying; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028600403830870574,"score_gpt":0.23732171294123675,"score_spread":0.20872130911036618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942284900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35251892,0.00011473521,0.00006181298,0.0005644374,0.0018880712,0.0001487645,0.000011004251,0.00011912017,0.64457315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242995,0.0000130869175,0.000094815165,0.0009972119,0.0008202683,0.000005752467,0.000030449115,0.000010003978,0.07372891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995777,0.000035617002,0.00010539926,0.00010864315,0.0000746232,0.00009802981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969393,0.0000393251,0.000042237,0.00014193992,0.00006129106,0.0000212745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012676028,0.00006168127,0.000094282725,0.000024148516,0.00010848939,0.00006242665,0.000057181955,0.000040206873,0.0051385704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005784309,0.00005475929,0.000046137095,0.000009337427,0.00006022602,0.00018473816,0.0000115100875,0.00013644343,0.0027287134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036744675,0.000035696776,0.00026322808,0.00004716232,0.000024657125,6.517393e-7,0.032800317,0.0000025576435,0.0005889427,0.95335644,0.011439741,0.001436932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240039,0.00006980906,0.00052313315,0.000007673976,0.0000139592,9.970295e-7,0.0019007428,0.00009242721,0.00035170576,0.011414578,0.9852872,0.000113768525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035908917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002836463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97384745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013425629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004137173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953730719","doi":"10.1111/rati.12242","title":"Naturalness constraints on best systems accounts of laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Interpretation (philosophy); Simplicity; Constraint (computer-aided design); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.03967469576711394,"score_gpt":0.2243489413905601,"score_spread":0.18467424562344617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953730719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29832566,0.0000893098,0.0000016370996,0.00009511858,0.0016732023,0.000113254864,0.000035343128,0.00001426836,0.6996522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836436,0.0000014347568,0.0000024074818,0.00011875196,0.00020293346,0.00000291965,0.0000032190974,0.0000030998644,0.016021661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955267,0.000011037804,0.00010709354,0.000098559765,0.00015530348,0.00007535796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997161,0.0000246626,0.00006367458,0.00011509819,0.000060907223,0.0000195259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074797645,0.000053581298,0.00009854195,0.000038428738,0.00011308846,0.000051443727,0.000116911535,0.000019507885,0.0012903666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005790097,0.000043380052,0.000024519999,0.000013538979,0.00031033042,0.00020359573,0.000007586181,0.000055480243,0.0007638898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068702607,0.00003253714,0.000027826502,0.00003473256,0.0000049611767,8.064169e-7,0.0048083495,0.000020532887,0.0007904627,0.9927634,0.000987777,0.0005217584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009192171,0.00068215025,0.00039320235,0.00045633139,0.000024487013,0.0000071198774,0.0094017675,0.00065673154,0.0014748074,0.0047758953,0.9806765,0.0005318439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086568245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005649133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019464513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027572823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011611653","doi":"10.1111/rati.12264","title":"Medicalization and linguistic agency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicalization; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychiatry; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1134480235290356,"score_gpt":0.33128982943054736,"score_spread":0.21784180590151175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011611653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25492352,0.00014089531,0.5855281,0.10613155,0.002193717,0.0011925484,0.000051862102,0.0009846367,0.048853192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98109543,0.000043112082,0.00025496,0.018051095,0.0002669277,0.000008204871,0.000005097334,0.000008908883,0.00026624466],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914485,0.000052711366,0.00019066158,0.00024964698,0.00025346488,0.000108665634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995516,0.00015475364,0.00005612538,0.00009087379,0.000037058016,0.000109598084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000075813325,0.00006299134,0.00006832942,0.00003081728,0.0001302486,0.00003980055,0.00010165813,0.00003627871,0.00038932814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007850578,0.000060532147,0.000009953474,0.00032434548,0.00019659416,0.00006221055,0.000049161536,0.0001420691,0.00010173298],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060484667,0.000043423457,0.000095573545,0.000052441614,0.0000023144196,0.000028989805,0.0026478374,0.0000048627758,0.7593509,0.22946419,0.0051109404,0.0031925046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001244734,0.0004653424,0.0017556478,0.00005803208,0.000036153746,0.000014593069,0.00005825053,0.050567348,0.6798575,0.053497046,0.21187478,0.0005705769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001426725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.834132e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7261719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007949912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003877454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93984425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011876580","doi":"10.1111/rati.12261","title":"The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Assertion; Norm (philosophy); Dialectic; Epistemology; Injustice; Deontic logic; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10974393688812152,"score_gpt":0.29286056849595526,"score_spread":0.18311663160783376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011876580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4929823,0.0016936209,0.0005496849,0.019498473,0.0019660888,0.00042409895,0.000012211119,0.00006328811,0.48281023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729866,0.000018100332,0.000004832904,0.00036912368,0.00041597406,0.000006095841,0.0000024720125,0.0000039850584,0.001880779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996018,0.00007023395,0.00014620373,0.00006318343,0.000047594138,0.00007100396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995762,0.00023510658,0.00003639611,0.000059974765,0.000072461895,0.000019863865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015273609,0.000040163264,0.000090763395,0.000009066173,0.00010244217,0.000028132949,0.0000590272,0.000025767078,0.00007369923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015491826,0.000027713082,0.00003280826,0.00002044899,0.0001941985,0.00005741668,0.000011479148,0.000117973424,0.000069649606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016709982,0.000031923457,0.00025717437,0.0000206795,0.000008901881,4.1106554e-7,0.060243882,9.3661515e-7,0.0003887484,0.93523794,0.0014268137,0.0023658553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062927295,0.00030111708,0.002362043,0.000026892487,0.000028962866,3.2606783e-7,0.013938238,0.0015187347,0.0037654277,0.019275853,0.95799184,0.00016129279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007057768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008017079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008375946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004306412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4473718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248327916","doi":"10.1111/rati.12310","title":"Controlling hope","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015392799391580196,"score_gpt":0.2937104179092143,"score_spread":0.27831761851763415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248327916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1573778,0.0013902462,0.015131444,0.0016114992,0.0017710709,0.00013082306,0.0000037316563,0.00010604499,0.82247734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96542853,0.000022515067,0.0006045472,0.0013586602,0.00040738948,0.00001129683,0.0000134361235,0.000013963656,0.032139666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940383,0.00006289745,0.0001288474,0.00017387382,0.00006602929,0.0001645013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999595,0.00006983162,0.000028483955,0.00021448755,0.00005017038,0.000042045216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010105269,0.00006438472,0.000112754955,0.000019884377,0.00007097182,0.00004385977,0.000057018668,0.00005769976,0.003160311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030233292,0.00006436795,0.00004685728,0.00008483504,0.000013987068,0.000050040417,0.000013371063,0.00008930021,0.0011792177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000249503,0.00068415195,0.014729186,0.00005210936,0.00070998515,0.0017148666,0.02663434,0.0020187225,0.040027898,0.6424424,0.13852222,0.13221462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008655113,0.00024703043,0.019929582,0.00008429127,0.00019964785,0.00019589395,0.0052066506,0.006278951,0.024982594,0.008266728,0.9248274,0.0011261449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022768618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001900909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80805075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010537089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031944775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285494459","doi":"10.1111/rati.12347","title":"The comparison problem for approximating epistemic ideals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Worry; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Bayesian probability; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.08906752553776437,"score_gpt":0.3022916171046589,"score_spread":0.21322409156689454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285494459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09698857,0.01139755,0.030865429,0.062412336,0.0121282395,0.009527013,0.0006419815,0.0010114558,0.7750274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644117,0.000008560853,0.00095499743,0.00069342955,0.0007670979,0.00077360665,0.00006369903,0.000024067453,0.032302853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910074,0.00013300986,0.0003130147,0.00013044641,0.00013870934,0.00018405773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990346,0.00051225314,0.00019307909,0.00016212852,0.000078474746,0.000019492581],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009591375,0.00007805305,0.00015376217,0.000017012482,0.0024414787,0.0001425356,0.0001759107,0.000016873691,0.00009213213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005483921,0.000058179423,0.00007739548,0.000018386803,0.00016149791,0.000062234074,0.000051891828,0.00020426538,0.000012037971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009958871,0.000026942917,0.00004894524,0.000068932364,0.000023610048,1.5334516e-7,0.030833038,0.00012532812,0.00010486218,0.9540819,0.012773619,0.0019027062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002010337,0.00010836056,0.0000053750946,0.0000063470134,0.000021422002,0.0000013461107,0.017130824,0.0037633982,0.0001146077,0.13214222,0.8464012,0.00010387736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006006391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004814398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8674231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003519678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000495255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366986237","doi":"10.1111/rati.12377","title":"Luck egalitarianism and non‐overlapping generations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Intuition; Positive economics; Skepticism; Epistemology; Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07122119246806932,"score_gpt":0.35062988984591076,"score_spread":0.27940869737784146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366986237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19368394,0.00006462574,0.0047020447,0.11230726,0.00090606336,0.00029281696,0.000026689992,0.00030609802,0.68771046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474466,0.000037617418,0.00013833921,0.0009230633,0.0005774308,0.0000066812363,0.000008326597,0.0000031957686,0.0035607056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994899,0.0000546509,0.000070954244,0.00008815758,0.00013396333,0.00016235141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.00012126873,0.000010406021,0.00006184576,0.000028192751,0.000084082516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035693718,0.000033815002,0.00004673938,0.000026277965,0.0006441835,0.00007401004,0.000049371178,0.00006567783,0.00004564119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027512255,0.000034880835,0.00001619164,0.00016256538,0.0001397587,0.0001477487,0.000018096825,0.00007900206,0.00019394203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3842798e-7,0.000003100122,0.000079389756,0.0000025877607,0.0000030031383,0.0000013791603,0.0064411974,0.0000132249515,0.00047237077,0.99098945,0.0018850216,0.0001089357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014552045,0.000017438872,0.008763543,0.000010873593,0.000012250349,3.7947754e-7,0.0021838674,0.0022978699,0.00022098812,0.9080355,0.07815287,0.00015884754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004932379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005590801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8010607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020012349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009652239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845283","doi":"10.1111/rati.12446","title":"The Motive of Duty, Emotional Motives, and the Kantian Criterion of Summonability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Social psychology; Psychology; Kantian ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01497038065176664,"score_gpt":0.24603274913944248,"score_spread":0.23106236848767583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848969,0.0018840363,0.00041006535,0.054548528,0.0005741372,0.00050850195,0.00013772237,0.000019079078,0.25702104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992166,0.000055168843,0.0000036201243,0.0001719074,0.000061467596,0.0000040161767,0.0000025833324,0.0000018161859,0.00048282152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.00014264429,0.00016552894,0.00007002771,0.00009269998,0.000050549224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.0006764192,0.000058341036,0.0001203508,0.00015366671,0.00000912465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005632514,0.0000452552,0.00009960986,0.000015902762,0.00026688777,0.000034398472,0.000086347456,0.000018178682,0.00007360372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155706,0.000022753078,0.000046059646,0.000019355215,0.0017686656,0.00004462427,0.000049605005,0.00009861165,6.762519e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056400604,0.000024551697,0.000107975735,0.000027873923,0.000027727901,5.360537e-8,0.004864077,0.000002023213,0.000035205827,0.9942876,0.000042464777,0.000524037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026183418,0.000018121487,0.0062307892,0.00002865857,0.000012947739,9.7443696e-8,0.00077538,0.00034010163,0.00021472262,0.9889724,0.0031219486,0.000022962411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117368414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031037998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31431973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000048919774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003567656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65167224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}