{"meta":{"query_hash":"861e4194cd7f","filters":{"venue":"Rationality and Society"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/861e4194cd7f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rationality+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2027316185","doi":"10.1177/1043463104044681","title":"Sincerity is Just Consistency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08175548118314206,"score_gpt":0.3687303800142215,"score_spread":0.2869748988310794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027316185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18257646,0.0027229302,0.13195303,0.048515406,0.0016950028,0.00016417628,0.0003012611,0.00041638786,0.6316554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96933573,0.00030953015,0.010457016,0.0024629286,0.00062891317,0.00014364431,0.00009884276,0.00018653843,0.01637688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876177,0.00433101,0.0007777535,0.0037960352,0.0023869935,0.0010905528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681911,0.011862031,0.003668679,0.009417734,0.0055135167,0.0013469815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011169238,0.00044249825,0.0015824542,0.0016798739,0.002882191,0.0067994664,0.0019054388,0.0027096958,0.010361339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04193966,0.0007544671,0.0009066184,0.0012078288,0.020179769,0.015470546,0.0051633255,0.005143797,0.0016108381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043178232,0.000025803512,0.001232836,0.000031564512,0.000045478002,0.00004646622,0.0010076658,0.00023630506,0.00020977839,0.9871917,0.0019198224,0.008009486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020279707,0.000014213701,0.00096660963,0.000016841563,0.000016306598,0.000075641576,0.00044232796,0.00035033078,0.00014632991,0.9925155,0.005423401,0.000012241997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011170332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007747765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011169238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015841841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019637463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059069276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090596035","doi":"10.1177/1043463106066379","title":"Coordination and Status Influence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Coordination game; Microeconomics; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.042633675244676525,"score_gpt":0.35963396257104013,"score_spread":0.3170002873263636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090596035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3154611,0.0009950332,0.31510234,0.014727835,0.00023337702,0.0003305197,0.0003862965,0.00023164897,0.35253185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713378,0.00028017306,0.01051811,0.0003073158,0.00007160241,0.00010222725,0.000055437908,0.00001612849,0.017311227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868625,0.00053867366,0.00003799499,0.00026529699,0.00024258388,0.0002291861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972837,0.0011407249,0.00067712384,0.00028296397,0.000252655,0.00036282078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018027005,0.000563836,0.0005477103,0.000893779,0.0009981223,0.0026983428,0.0011073274,0.001913629,0.014785269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008857292,0.00028827286,0.0005931858,0.0006098014,0.0022253797,0.0027488323,0.0017410286,0.0011854266,0.0014672218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010342171,0.00006396163,0.005311997,0.000042351352,0.00003356824,0.00044404544,0.0010115915,0.029078113,0.0010301116,0.9445636,0.0024086933,0.015908476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013866853,0.00019134559,0.0056715487,0.000047270656,0.00007022214,0.0004125787,0.00055888935,0.12797673,0.00047353838,0.8418409,0.022565844,0.00005238471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005132384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031579395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014785269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018431724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010368194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049461603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113754449","doi":"10.1177/1043463104039874","title":"Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Path dependence; Action (physics); Determinism; Positive economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Path (computing); Institutional change; Parametric statistics; Sociology; Bayesian probability; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03834167118284554,"score_gpt":0.2412328040898505,"score_spread":0.20289113290700497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113754449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079164654,0.010751997,0.34269503,0.27098098,0.0014842217,0.00019211562,0.00030840223,0.00036126326,0.29406136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432149,0.0035296958,0.03771261,0.0048732944,0.000591913,0.0002818509,0.000073527866,0.00015812242,0.009564159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859715,0.0073814476,0.0005148476,0.0022588456,0.0027114677,0.0011618988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851518,0.0071850987,0.0013338759,0.0041019474,0.0012825007,0.0009447643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015608194,0.0007332503,0.0012358968,0.0027155664,0.004100961,0.011425107,0.0029079015,0.006058151,0.0084809195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027156947,0.00072791753,0.0013138145,0.002387483,0.07206299,0.03869131,0.010400635,0.008604151,0.000841768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000614987,0.0000036017902,0.000094717194,0.000012932959,0.0000024402423,0.0000121425455,0.00035669343,0.00021253302,0.000011386509,0.9972012,0.00020117003,0.001885106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004631097,0.0000031895215,0.000048406066,0.00001545265,0.000001124447,0.000013142626,0.00024407289,0.00045894,0.000014806416,0.9947857,0.004406872,0.0000036788483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030872829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002906196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015608194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060853646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08254498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119323505","doi":"10.1177/1043463104044678","title":"Emotions as Strategic Signals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Epistemology; Criticism; Game theory; Maximization; Psychology; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04165609371631892,"score_gpt":0.3245043765242653,"score_spread":0.2828482828079464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119323505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06574066,0.011834709,0.15976056,0.054654818,0.0019090255,0.00012034258,0.00030618676,0.00024800142,0.70542574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494471,0.004073561,0.015304656,0.005503224,0.0006883033,0.00013817335,0.00012713476,0.00007731613,0.024640629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826556,0.0008439352,0.000062319305,0.0002646297,0.00037207783,0.00019141477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981552,0.0009431016,0.000266013,0.00015862456,0.00028416544,0.00019293152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017506909,0.00067406846,0.00030769553,0.00076896424,0.00092878164,0.006463912,0.0007458484,0.0026702515,0.0065075676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057666022,0.00025790607,0.00040368718,0.0006009982,0.0067106616,0.008744281,0.0024193309,0.0026840267,0.0012551354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011347053,0.0000070748347,0.00026071357,0.000051176234,0.0000071536037,0.0000638549,0.0014916615,0.000603096,0.00046740915,0.9889761,0.0013433471,0.0067169666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014510323,0.000035028574,0.00066088454,0.000105458326,0.000016220254,0.00015209522,0.0014068636,0.0022891206,0.00043804865,0.9336857,0.061171558,0.000024538218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006102656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037337127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065075676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014629428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006441609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121928301","doi":"10.1177/1043463114546313","title":"Signaling commitments, making concessions: Democratization and state ratification of international human rights treaties, 1966–2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Democratization; Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.030107388249987623,"score_gpt":0.3247505052585631,"score_spread":0.2946431170085755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121928301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95340085,0.001145634,0.0021299392,0.0055025755,0.00004909568,0.000033911427,0.00035905177,0.000021511283,0.03735731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972153,0.00028450062,0.00018499962,0.000114154005,0.00002034533,0.000009093009,0.00011006797,0.000004111106,0.002057389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981194,0.00067021034,0.00010502241,0.00027304515,0.00032348224,0.0005087387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96919996,0.018788714,0.009576698,0.0010767448,0.00072701,0.0006308782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006888679,0.00013776783,0.00028120817,0.0011494637,0.001168567,0.0026932599,0.000659094,0.0010621698,0.007504974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031234935,0.00018753635,0.00028620474,0.0019192732,0.0033046,0.0027220245,0.0017179055,0.0025314412,0.00042417803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001075658,0.0006904482,0.39834386,0.00022945608,0.0001833689,0.00062381796,0.020289633,0.019653236,0.0014427896,0.4417961,0.008924925,0.106746696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095360716,0.00024676984,0.7893079,0.00026302956,0.0001382715,0.00024384838,0.013261632,0.015301769,0.0034682096,0.1347038,0.04284518,0.00012426947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017991474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026205616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017991474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003075978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022787028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036431193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137377316","doi":"10.1177/104346301013001004","title":"INFORMATIONAL CONSTRAINT AND FOCAL POINT CONVERGENCE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Convergence (economics); Democracy; Positive economics; Institutionalism; Pareto principle; Language change; Point (geometry); Economics; Preference; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic system; Political science; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04528607859776627,"score_gpt":0.3388122159711552,"score_spread":0.2935261373733889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137377316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68032527,0.00056154456,0.18275513,0.0028266825,0.000034675573,0.0001016517,0.00029456534,0.00016210452,0.13293834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084646,0.00013684141,0.006552833,0.000043931526,0.000013940634,0.000054353055,0.00007555407,0.0000131713405,0.0022629148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976545,0.00088966946,0.000136888,0.0004918939,0.00041093183,0.00041612008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844683,0.007170599,0.0015008298,0.0010443318,0.0013176247,0.00051987846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031347612,0.00030533032,0.0009186188,0.0016834154,0.0016219082,0.0030126455,0.001022171,0.0011821183,0.00700105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020998504,0.00028083014,0.0008663512,0.0014224722,0.0035089997,0.002851448,0.003340766,0.0011581839,0.0005610182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060868144,0.000024801635,0.0020924625,0.0000467705,0.00003252241,0.00019073985,0.00055167853,0.016134031,0.0007116208,0.970393,0.0005118221,0.009249673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041952604,0.00004561858,0.002651198,0.000035654324,0.00003290669,0.00014453105,0.0006805671,0.06317556,0.0010474202,0.9288813,0.0032314195,0.00003190478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004639866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026234502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00700105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023862896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016239601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02342081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142968483","doi":"10.1177/1043463114546316","title":"The influence of positional and experienced social benefits on the relationship between peers and alcohol use","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Popularity; Social psychology; Peer group; Sociometry; Centrality; Peer pressure; Social group; Alcohol; Interpersonal ties; Power (physics); Developmental psychology; Peer influence","score_opus":0.17537582728898907,"score_gpt":0.34826838060896687,"score_spread":0.1728925533199778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142968483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99619967,0.000189867,0.00014372468,0.00018518929,0.000006581497,0.000006122158,0.000023823752,0.0000023146852,0.0032427337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997781,0.00004455593,0.000047330133,0.0000072012085,0.000005512482,0.0000015568004,0.0000069419852,9.3530275e-7,0.00010796524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966191,0.0020066032,0.00010311755,0.0003112767,0.0006282711,0.00033160107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702896,0.008068265,0.0020081277,0.0006087078,0.00042247277,0.0018634277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017306133,0.00021685688,0.00027325598,0.0007894765,0.00081214873,0.001191714,0.00037055172,0.00035150727,0.0023396704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012824292,0.00013358805,0.0003120402,0.00042642286,0.001745575,0.00065114157,0.0012529388,0.00053270534,0.00012411489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026169277,0.0001543322,0.98533463,0.00001664678,0.00025398433,0.00013621093,0.0019548652,0.00016327707,0.0005607297,0.0012627643,0.00008292079,0.009817838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054526577,0.0001449413,0.9971757,0.000010726312,0.000055169923,0.000083599996,0.0013253959,0.00030867982,0.00012156979,0.0005271321,0.00023506067,0.000006517468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008678386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014587966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008678386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005730598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006425593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017255723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147821822","doi":"10.1177/1043463111434700","title":"Game theory and the kula","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Mathematical economics; Game theory; Game tree; Strong reciprocity; Sociology; Economics; Non-cooperative game; Sequential game; Social science","score_opus":0.014614668660313475,"score_gpt":0.29378075798181696,"score_spread":0.2791660893215035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147821822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04378269,0.011150658,0.5253824,0.015117996,0.00053830654,0.00017310529,0.0002931795,0.00014292148,0.40341878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907881,0.0033111107,0.061177902,0.0010301681,0.00028586338,0.00025859984,0.000116779054,0.000047992395,0.025890635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975164,0.0015864436,0.00009643303,0.0002825168,0.00035042388,0.00016775225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983878,0.0010319996,0.0001320234,0.0001526919,0.00017529284,0.00012023791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018266845,0.00055240834,0.00058745756,0.0010277912,0.001586379,0.0035983708,0.0011299858,0.0013644783,0.0037984771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040567685,0.0002442659,0.00066054217,0.00083066936,0.008493479,0.003442266,0.0021968558,0.0024100936,0.000557343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015579978,0.0000030139765,0.000034483666,0.0000094976795,0.0000021285157,0.00001069515,0.00007588016,0.0012660029,0.000021946465,0.9971142,0.00024343701,0.0012171826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035709231,0.000006788621,0.00004443834,0.000018184592,0.0000020191155,0.000018861758,0.00006872742,0.006253354,0.000026609467,0.9851804,0.008372877,0.0000041008716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024856783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004628971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003329044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018136668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024154007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159676261","doi":"10.1177/1043463108099350","title":"A New Model of Wage Determination and Wage Inequality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Wage; Economics; Efficiency wage; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Wage share; Salary; Inequality; Democracy; Politics; Economic inequality; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.07928578226554259,"score_gpt":0.24092022664712212,"score_spread":0.16163444438157953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159676261","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07251103,0.0015973764,0.75136024,0.028764037,0.0004719828,0.00007712671,0.00071741146,0.00018954514,0.14431122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86734563,0.001573583,0.058327388,0.0018805511,0.0010448409,0.00023530665,0.00025206205,0.00008312925,0.069257535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999027,0.00049414136,0.00003113841,0.00015892052,0.00016589765,0.00012291264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979526,0.0012589394,0.00018644668,0.00019706032,0.00023692315,0.00016795962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018172389,0.0004688172,0.0008567758,0.000893834,0.0008967504,0.0031340907,0.0021476347,0.0023998476,0.010641436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053315195,0.0003569718,0.00072746124,0.0014222473,0.0024694086,0.0042466307,0.0013865907,0.0023960823,0.0009101103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071662926,0.000017375016,0.0002955814,0.000009205186,0.0000075515786,0.00003502811,0.000092037255,0.010624124,0.000048336206,0.9844155,0.0015548042,0.0028933808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014403395,0.000006104926,0.00020676693,0.0000065513286,0.000005827334,0.000030032712,0.000050553273,0.05222779,0.000016791199,0.944384,0.0030456446,0.0000055574537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056482307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004127832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010641436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017782917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017417993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035599113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159858563","doi":"10.1177/1043463113492308","title":"An alternative explanation of the chance of casting a pivotal vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Contingent vote; Representation (politics); Econometrics; Schedule; Economics; Duty; Microeconomics; Political science; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.0435015546628973,"score_gpt":0.34269821527563304,"score_spread":0.29919666061273575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159858563","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08733277,0.0020330315,0.7174446,0.02838506,0.0013451495,0.0005739465,0.00197263,0.0006384282,0.1602744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90866697,0.0008399039,0.03395146,0.0032454312,0.00101612,0.00051165745,0.00051228434,0.00010291292,0.05115328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935766,0.0022870493,0.0002655264,0.001847296,0.0011510369,0.0008725368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833439,0.008713217,0.002253913,0.0038839015,0.0012422507,0.00056288746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008452582,0.0008205461,0.0011841164,0.0015141086,0.0014634562,0.0032302544,0.0034943442,0.004563167,0.0707155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033459973,0.00044527848,0.0014565125,0.0012921281,0.0040661367,0.005868759,0.0024127674,0.0030867339,0.005235843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021395627,0.000068826106,0.0022753244,0.00008742012,0.000035638404,0.00014488414,0.00028472344,0.002949484,0.0004494858,0.9777724,0.0037435293,0.0119742965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381363,0.00024420608,0.0030634848,0.000060964885,0.000037513702,0.00045837404,0.00015724005,0.018384453,0.0005485343,0.963684,0.013079355,0.000043689393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019389404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0707155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014655008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016223065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487158812","doi":"10.1177/1043463114561754","title":"Norms and trades: An experimental investigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Redistribution (election); Microeconomics; Norm of reciprocity; Norm (philosophy); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13794076445803347,"score_gpt":0.3745872668142628,"score_spread":0.23664650235622933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487158812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96846384,0.00017108841,0.00876344,0.0008405023,0.00017462861,0.000842857,0.00022769676,0.00008234512,0.020433536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98130774,0.00017193748,0.010869784,0.0006226739,0.00010788373,0.0021014833,0.00016459281,0.000047980295,0.0046060053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477357,0.002821577,0.0003956971,0.00078356656,0.0008793168,0.0003462803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9362645,0.045851313,0.0050457073,0.010386912,0.0014849426,0.00096658437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076509267,0.0007581092,0.00070778496,0.0005743059,0.0012272671,0.0026228614,0.0016151506,0.001969311,0.012554936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038950432,0.00062215223,0.00049156556,0.0005089161,0.004020492,0.0026355567,0.0018362532,0.0026771838,0.00081737415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031008776,0.16041651,0.0684334,0.0034054657,0.00096715277,0.0023504894,0.02912391,0.01938531,0.15500045,0.3817278,0.011708082,0.13647258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017701369,0.10227328,0.08639866,0.00061253016,0.00076785573,0.0023652152,0.0147971865,0.073569015,0.08588831,0.53250426,0.0825569,0.0005653671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044668207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038487793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012554936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008515705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008412512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042000473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794090321","doi":"10.1177/1043463117754078","title":"The role of rationality in motivating participation in social movements: The case of anti-Japanese demonstrations in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Rationality; Social psychology; Mediation; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Interpersonal ties; Beijing; China; Construct (python library); Perception; Identity (music); Collective identity; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03103690391254499,"score_gpt":0.37488404374514983,"score_spread":0.34384713983260484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794090321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962113,0.000018527067,0.00017601528,0.0003937105,0.0000018470656,0.000009867928,0.000002444504,0.0000014264906,0.003184867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997192,0.0000152079765,0.00008594159,0.000017058364,0.0000011337054,0.00000561087,0.0000018247109,6.178757e-7,0.00015335991],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974922,0.0013418307,0.000060257375,0.00016960662,0.00021032893,0.00072578393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963148,0.0018326752,0.00077613455,0.00021554348,0.00018260867,0.00067828974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004848395,0.00040163758,0.00042897798,0.0010506025,0.006165248,0.0024588036,0.0011410753,0.0016500298,0.00210501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048703654,0.00026532717,0.00050349993,0.00082934974,0.006706423,0.0016943178,0.0031976008,0.0016909835,0.00008230826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003867368,0.0011097913,0.55578077,0.00019742562,0.00013838876,0.015051438,0.27038792,0.0060179387,0.0043066554,0.118244976,0.0011038781,0.027274134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002126295,0.00035213222,0.51102096,0.00015341779,0.00015883065,0.0008845498,0.40696064,0.033738025,0.001232304,0.035242457,0.009876695,0.00016738527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082886375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10706346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082886375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00657827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052266275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16480786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884308069","doi":"10.1177/1043463118787498","title":"Adam Smith and the Buddha","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Gautama Buddha; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Buddhist philosophy; Adam smith; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0227485108746386,"score_gpt":0.21495778155365966,"score_spread":0.19220927067902105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884308069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04130323,0.05104545,0.007040093,0.25027987,0.003821767,0.00003528984,0.00012819824,0.000100899655,0.6462452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77040267,0.017767467,0.0061838655,0.013242609,0.0012943143,0.000037883798,0.000054918426,0.00008076121,0.19093549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998939,0.00058496505,0.000023896415,0.00014747387,0.00021002843,0.000094629315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937856,0.00029653497,0.000066750705,0.00006485378,0.00010514407,0.00008814353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088646304,0.00034318824,0.00032028087,0.00051920937,0.005019871,0.0039608874,0.000460062,0.0013561331,0.0037261155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001760536,0.00020689558,0.00020741823,0.000647294,0.015678573,0.0025634617,0.0017256318,0.003641147,0.0009797035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103298735,0.000006029639,0.00017588498,0.000023327199,0.000004111135,0.000060872513,0.0025824648,0.0001308321,0.000059601556,0.97185284,0.01919104,0.005902702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061950764,0.000012797773,0.0004949831,0.00008193695,0.0000054314496,0.00015126959,0.0025140145,0.00032922003,0.00018230175,0.47489074,0.52131855,0.000012594112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007898536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074383146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007898536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038864273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002161061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028198183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298395795","doi":"10.1177/10434631221130850","title":"Regulation and state capacity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Parallels; Offensive; State (computer science); Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.044062406486211826,"score_gpt":0.27203355956071895,"score_spread":0.22797115307450713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298395795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41248304,0.001162568,0.050293576,0.011484463,0.00014847895,0.000105376545,0.00036817158,0.00014638445,0.52380794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965347,0.00009266126,0.0007513831,0.00023499584,0.00001565082,0.000035937734,0.000027435583,0.0000061219275,0.0023011272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963403,0.0013547168,0.00014078156,0.0007742181,0.00042215243,0.0009679573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422497,0.0024125217,0.0012735747,0.0011140514,0.00048189829,0.00049297203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003140584,0.00021855024,0.00035938955,0.0011467405,0.0024825437,0.0043878597,0.0007087863,0.0014530475,0.00925511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007665171,0.00017665062,0.00058712397,0.0010631209,0.018497579,0.0036711341,0.0038362243,0.0015646822,0.0004654384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014659491,0.0000114265395,0.002358427,0.000017754368,0.000009787255,0.000022912009,0.0006592055,0.0017908181,0.0002605097,0.9912344,0.00038583076,0.0032341836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003968109,0.000059546503,0.011354304,0.0001345067,0.00002495938,0.00009643732,0.0023847034,0.005095002,0.0009118033,0.9510035,0.028850477,0.00004512841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045314617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033191121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00925511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036116024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002589544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030961454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}