{"meta":{"query_hash":"861e4194cd7f","filters":{"venue":"Rationality and Society"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/861e4194cd7f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Rationality+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2027316185","doi":"10.1177/1043463104044681","title":"Sincerity is Just Consistency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08175548118314206,"score_gpt":0.3687303800142215,"score_spread":0.2869748988310794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027316185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815115,0.00020903317,0.000954011,0.005869964,0.00020652366,0.00010082238,0.00007729472,0.000036452766,0.0110344095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937055,0.00002689609,0.0015806523,0.0026371933,0.00007527615,0.000012169651,0.000029303643,0.000003258831,0.0019297503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995514,0.000019701736,0.00010829234,0.00015172735,0.00007734791,0.00009148912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997516,0.000016760006,0.00002535192,0.00011343646,0.000049391292,0.000043448978],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012907581,0.00005438931,0.00006961815,0.000004236538,0.000231998,0.000019527715,0.000031240983,0.000081700746,0.0010405357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045307233,0.000052144733,0.00008030154,0.000052576874,0.00014068982,0.000060681727,0.000013686363,0.000080767495,0.00005704327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005156293,0.00031455696,0.015047931,0.000015145945,0.000043981097,0.0000022192962,0.011145936,0.0000023040952,0.00032375165,0.9559801,0.015847404,0.0012714945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009812644,0.000044049517,0.9598982,0.000008543556,0.000041309682,0.000017742454,0.0036467728,0.000005457951,0.00012621612,0.016662229,0.018405175,0.00016304136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024767328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021675125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94485027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027499816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004492404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090596035","doi":"10.1177/1043463106066379","title":"Coordination and Status Influence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Coordination game; Microeconomics; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.042633675244676525,"score_gpt":0.35963396257104013,"score_spread":0.3170002873263636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090596035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903718,0.00007665412,0.0049919384,0.0021413395,0.000012038636,0.00006835461,0.000023338565,0.000015395188,0.0022991302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722964,0.000013472144,0.0009723593,0.00035988557,0.00003569856,0.000008805975,0.0000131269435,0.0000013153095,0.0013657205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999241,0.0000582522,0.00017853148,0.00017529503,0.00027025823,0.00007668002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991572,0.0004930989,0.000059905156,0.00010660135,0.0001466165,0.000036592977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010319732,0.000042883796,0.00006303174,0.000010357478,0.0002981218,0.00014134479,0.00005566564,0.000036789377,0.00005009929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017693761,0.000034967485,0.00002788704,0.00016269609,0.00018201495,0.00026005215,0.000029613653,0.000044776472,0.000014016712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022088716,0.000025312838,0.05081772,0.0000024506755,0.0000031184393,4.9931163e-8,0.0005838536,0.0001599175,0.0017979508,0.93988186,0.0045217318,0.002203834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009114819,0.0000036731833,0.53804445,8.4453876e-7,0.0000021162011,9.296457e-7,0.00030837033,0.0014103984,0.00009499324,0.44500175,0.015004174,0.000037133777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006714606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023520915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49488008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009642048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002467103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22929421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113754449","doi":"10.1177/1043463104039874","title":"Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Path dependence; Action (physics); Determinism; Positive economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Path (computing); Institutional change; Parametric statistics; Sociology; Bayesian probability; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03834167118284554,"score_gpt":0.2412328040898505,"score_spread":0.20289113290700497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113754449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8570801,0.0004634022,0.11910197,0.0076711816,0.0002948281,0.00021977472,0.00011605084,0.000012427636,0.015040293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948915,0.000037822334,0.0033926212,0.0012018643,0.000116477,0.000010674825,0.0000099987365,0.000002271684,0.00033674802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994834,0.000008604629,0.0002723709,0.00013257077,0.000024094064,0.00007892682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968565,0.00005262134,0.0001056238,0.00010758364,0.000015571348,0.00003295265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052280154,0.000057406523,0.000097627366,0.000010980938,0.00051008415,0.000036819823,0.00013234523,0.000031052732,0.000056068704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004847618,0.000042773376,0.00006701894,0.00006344717,0.0001580911,0.00016856079,0.000046065274,0.0000665753,0.000034747452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000193969,0.000016862465,0.0009356309,0.000003889324,0.000031686122,8.576771e-8,0.0074140704,0.001341736,0.000009627209,0.9896379,0.00011862705,0.00048792982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007363088,0.000025791736,0.23359293,0.000033355478,0.00000684095,0.000017627382,0.0008795114,0.00035174566,0.00065940985,0.46507266,0.2983952,0.00022864364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007768832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031060583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5245653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055308865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000141412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39232066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119323505","doi":"10.1177/1043463104044678","title":"Emotions as Strategic Signals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Epistemology; Criticism; Game theory; Maximization; Psychology; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Economics; Philosophy; Social group; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04165609371631892,"score_gpt":0.3245043765242653,"score_spread":0.2828482828079464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119323505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094462,0.00013018012,0.003402074,0.016108904,0.00009258209,0.00016540791,0.000013030105,0.000082628016,0.07055899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960231,0.00017799117,0.0005016998,0.0009302377,0.00021462553,0.0000086818645,0.000028817138,0.0000021367125,0.0021127106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993623,0.00012005363,0.00009848139,0.000117390024,0.0001948919,0.00010686781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997029,0.00005965397,0.0000259896,0.000051982723,0.000095180396,0.00006432483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006419091,0.00004758704,0.000052542673,0.0000060783145,0.0012603112,0.00007089802,0.00004794919,0.000074747135,0.00043853265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039460185,0.00004914689,0.000056156347,0.00011929167,0.00027771437,0.0002931117,0.000008802112,0.000071140326,0.000048610473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001923101,0.00003996971,0.00006265195,0.0000024158412,0.000008853218,1.8841328e-7,0.008108759,0.0004956191,0.00034183782,0.99072224,0.00016182379,0.00005374052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019280182,0.000025528534,0.0026655132,0.000006743635,0.000007482964,0.0000013620855,0.010202353,0.000054059863,0.00004701101,0.9848589,0.0018558446,0.00008245138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004722539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002326823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086576894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006768628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000356323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121928301","doi":"10.1177/1043463114546313","title":"Signaling commitments, making concessions: Democratization and state ratification of international human rights treaties, 1966–2006","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Democratization; Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.030107388249987623,"score_gpt":0.3247505052585631,"score_spread":0.2946431170085755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121928301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96073896,0.00013122428,0.023155356,0.0015044531,0.00017917693,0.0003631477,0.00004032261,0.00004936875,0.013838011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952854,0.000050821996,0.0030138579,0.00015260928,0.000094218536,0.000011490619,0.00011999336,0.000003032037,0.001268584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898696,0.00017489442,0.00027726372,0.00016129158,0.00030689847,0.00009269299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942714,0.00014334168,0.00016845424,0.000060143873,0.00015772886,0.000043206266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079260254,0.00007284557,0.00011195413,0.000020273194,0.0015026974,0.0001046151,0.00006823578,0.000057786638,0.00010636674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000278411,0.00006129781,0.000030886342,0.000063935186,0.00030403063,0.0002561731,0.0000206452,0.00005247598,8.460073e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005073512,0.000060243594,0.018305179,0.000022903247,0.00005147332,8.956857e-8,0.035290837,0.000049918228,0.0005654661,0.94317466,0.0010730108,0.0014011437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018586335,0.00007696145,0.18224871,0.00025127604,0.00006413137,9.896012e-7,0.0070993053,0.0066451374,0.001977374,0.60332346,0.19583935,0.00061469607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038505363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008262741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33985123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005702032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000635121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137377316","doi":"10.1177/104346301013001004","title":"INFORMATIONAL CONSTRAINT AND FOCAL POINT CONVERGENCE","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Convergence (economics); Democracy; Positive economics; Institutionalism; Pareto principle; Language change; Point (geometry); Economics; Preference; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic system; Political science; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04528607859776627,"score_gpt":0.3388122159711552,"score_spread":0.2935261373733889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137377316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730864,0.000057348672,0.0029859357,0.0120428465,0.00008393404,0.00013930156,0.0000125330735,0.000028568153,0.011563111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838066,0.000054310356,0.0001810701,0.0009021228,0.00013933927,0.0000070740157,0.000010353179,0.0000010201792,0.00032403698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994391,0.00006249949,0.00013178552,0.000069901325,0.00017388017,0.00012281809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964845,0.000119520635,0.00002885445,0.000026962916,0.00007449361,0.00010170808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052990386,0.00003788885,0.00005643857,0.0000042003335,0.00043345694,0.00005505691,0.000020666455,0.000058332527,0.00021885536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007945152,0.0000358828,0.0000269179,0.000054075244,0.00035091618,0.00025360793,0.00000947303,0.00004926941,0.0000071053637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019006371,0.000009440901,0.037031915,0.000007729407,0.0000066540497,1.1842702e-7,0.005458677,0.000002730402,0.000026784504,0.9560998,0.0009312034,0.00042306626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006765941,0.00006307155,0.6918427,0.000027855438,0.000020978438,0.000011950545,0.009155444,0.00692618,0.00004781924,0.17079479,0.12008837,0.00034425815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013486699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044168954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031596115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009248568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33338442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142968483","doi":"10.1177/1043463114546316","title":"The influence of positional and experienced social benefits on the relationship between peers and alcohol use","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Popularity; Social psychology; Peer group; Sociometry; Centrality; Peer pressure; Social group; Alcohol; Interpersonal ties; Power (physics); Developmental psychology; Peer influence","score_opus":0.17537582728898907,"score_gpt":0.34826838060896687,"score_spread":0.1728925533199778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142968483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99364245,0.00020005176,0.000003636368,0.005947201,0.0000084985695,0.00013586246,0.000010512143,0.0000063559683,0.00004544048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991389,0.000058229783,0.00009476711,0.00052614015,0.000047278525,0.000012057744,0.000022516942,0.000002266921,0.0000978303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995083,0.00003656679,0.000102805025,0.00008537857,0.00020765037,0.000059255635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.0012045255,0.00004171905,0.000055116565,0.00008729368,0.000040266514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002791541,0.0000539299,0.00007972401,0.0000047123494,0.00042913784,0.00002701581,0.000019203515,0.000044674936,0.0000016853114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022550384,0.000030443889,0.000031939675,0.00005113833,0.00029662263,0.00011915121,0.000011710179,0.000067373876,3.528139e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031563133,0.000010151078,0.9185439,0.0000030144959,0.00003507456,1.0372378e-7,0.011973615,0.0000045214324,0.000019109864,0.06898484,0.00029572338,0.00009838998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006574014,0.000030231013,0.99261165,0.000012989872,0.00003063406,0.0000015122241,0.0039041582,0.000017028291,0.00004027407,0.0026074776,0.000054604498,0.000032056614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009705767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006922123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07406774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020454814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039099905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33006248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147821822","doi":"10.1177/1043463111434700","title":"Game theory and the kula","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Mathematical economics; Game theory; Game tree; Strong reciprocity; Sociology; Economics; Non-cooperative game; Sequential game; Social science","score_opus":0.014614668660313475,"score_gpt":0.29378075798181696,"score_spread":0.2791660893215035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147821822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153214,0.0039185546,0.0064184032,0.0132577205,0.00023715399,0.00034413754,0.000010971678,0.00006264874,0.06042903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470466,0.0004685804,0.00009473205,0.0015468396,0.00037804001,0.000011393208,0.0000072549874,0.0000015753398,0.0027869234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887884,0.00075196626,0.00006966465,0.00006224051,0.00013188187,0.000105420375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992616,0.00058340403,0.000022576065,0.000047862486,0.00003728507,0.000047240483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047828373,0.000037579888,0.00005022586,0.0000025450693,0.0009094906,0.000043867796,0.00003677832,0.000049211005,0.000094871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013798427,0.000026058995,0.00003650019,0.000051228017,0.00091273105,0.00030198926,0.00001787572,0.00006371856,0.000005867176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001793385,0.000012001675,0.0017186053,0.0000024127362,0.000009770703,7.786508e-9,0.047319874,0.0000014738085,0.000009829405,0.950097,0.00027461466,0.00053645426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074045727,0.000009212553,0.0726925,0.000006889574,0.00003468517,0.0000025650625,0.028609911,0.00021550285,0.000016329706,0.8255336,0.07199905,0.00013928377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053022377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025239648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1245634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016202608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039786522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6995159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159676261","doi":"10.1177/1043463108099350","title":"A New Model of Wage Determination and Wage Inequality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Wage; Economics; Efficiency wage; Labour economics; Distribution (mathematics); Wage share; Salary; Inequality; Democracy; Politics; Economic inequality; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.07928578226554259,"score_gpt":0.24092022664712212,"score_spread":0.16163444438157953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159676261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92707133,0.00023037384,0.067357235,0.00030544976,0.000036220565,0.00006807524,0.00017784606,0.000010201105,0.0047432617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261683,0.0003096084,0.006129447,0.00022292632,0.00003579816,0.0000034159707,0.00002120099,0.0000028439476,0.00065791875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994479,0.000009863209,0.00030168626,0.00015809834,0.0000150093665,0.00006745931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967605,0.000042292777,0.00012608423,0.00009446117,0.000016533406,0.00004459162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003972484,0.00005744824,0.00015555124,0.000016215803,0.00018805856,0.000011647325,0.000037700018,0.000067358334,0.00006167106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000412842,0.00006843706,0.000063154206,0.00003887191,0.00013400988,0.000304264,0.000024936511,0.00005683514,0.0000053316817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033834276,0.000023816936,0.010187466,0.000015319685,0.000013279093,7.47516e-8,0.002454228,0.00023018639,0.00007559109,0.9865025,0.0002551027,0.00023904128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011578016,0.000041156956,0.17020233,0.000012104598,0.000010394319,0.000009764898,0.0002498548,0.21009944,0.00044315433,0.6143383,0.0031120456,0.0003236981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102431295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011703432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37216425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023675066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038341794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27907822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159858563","doi":"10.1177/1043463113492308","title":"An alternative explanation of the chance of casting a pivotal vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Voting; Contingent vote; Representation (politics); Econometrics; Schedule; Economics; Duty; Microeconomics; Political science; Group voting ticket; Law","score_opus":0.0435015546628973,"score_gpt":0.34269821527563304,"score_spread":0.29919666061273575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159858563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973146,0.000023333378,0.00029495906,0.0004057676,0.00005958089,0.000066871005,0.000012475302,0.0000034899565,0.0018189782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939543,0.000015279833,0.0004248165,0.00006304082,0.000056049976,0.000003904926,0.0000022353045,0.0000011131526,0.000038124264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996117,0.0000763215,0.00009702633,0.00006542993,0.00010469651,0.00004483528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997253,0.000058449557,0.000101938786,0.000042388245,0.000058682806,0.000013275714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041893835,0.00002687363,0.000059397196,0.0000026044218,0.00026048953,0.000007836464,0.000056711946,0.000021611988,0.0000036656145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003874206,0.000022715674,0.000035796555,0.000034995337,0.00027372706,0.00012585122,0.000019518691,0.000026280262,1.03661876e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059448066,0.00010853896,0.13956164,0.00002006184,0.000030941534,1.6840332e-8,0.21120903,0.00012322803,0.019512406,0.6280979,0.00008136047,0.0012489728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002599,0.00018129603,0.761244,0.00007899597,0.00004258132,5.819165e-7,0.10456545,0.016653325,0.07430426,0.0406118,0.00095764315,0.00035749777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002001506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010353302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62168235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029009745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024504921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30256918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487158812","doi":"10.1177/1043463114561754","title":"Norms and trades: An experimental investigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Redistribution (election); Microeconomics; Norm of reciprocity; Norm (philosophy); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13794076445803347,"score_gpt":0.3745872668142628,"score_spread":0.23664650235622933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487158812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99598044,0.0003435762,0.000009270471,0.0011527204,0.0000609938,0.000095914824,0.0000058284118,0.000025443032,0.0023258075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792796,0.000055546498,0.0012863382,0.0004550959,0.000098772376,0.00001475042,0.000017538525,0.0000026119433,0.0001413745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995351,0.00005425091,0.00008620531,0.00012934621,0.0001145893,0.00008049495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975044,0.000018539142,0.000027313221,0.000037097576,0.00002783831,0.00013877712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003953636,0.000049369522,0.00006436148,0.000004263673,0.00044725186,0.00007867868,0.00003172415,0.000049551203,0.000012878815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013697803,0.000050329832,0.000019532448,0.00003068459,0.00049421925,0.0004899021,0.000022797165,0.000036986035,0.000001744477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007279749,0.000105537554,0.09804243,0.0000048129486,0.000016277845,2.3106998e-7,0.54789245,0.0000029348628,0.0054858336,0.34654826,0.0016487347,0.0002452361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016477957,0.00027635656,0.10241989,0.000011879645,0.00002507892,0.0000028965956,0.82282466,0.00068455545,0.011205725,0.04949618,0.010808314,0.0005966456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009414532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026864966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2970521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000960332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000723211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3439945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794090321","doi":"10.1177/1043463117754078","title":"The role of rationality in motivating participation in social movements: The case of anti-Japanese demonstrations in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal communication; Rationality; Social psychology; Mediation; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Interpersonal ties; Beijing; China; Construct (python library); Perception; Identity (music); Collective identity; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03103690391254499,"score_gpt":0.37488404374514983,"score_spread":0.34384713983260484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794090321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99342555,0.000033609864,0.000030405667,0.0028153958,0.0000550906,0.00019257581,0.000010506476,0.000003232616,0.0034336594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996177,0.000025451021,0.000037056805,0.00012365179,0.00013621054,0.000027870437,0.0000061960886,0.0000017017745,0.00002416001],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987302,0.0005087388,0.00037457072,0.00010812694,0.00014704908,0.00013131682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992923,0.00039254656,0.00014110381,0.000056756548,0.00010315317,0.000014097969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021261517,0.000048347163,0.00010414658,0.000014700423,0.00063994224,0.000020700994,0.00008080139,0.000082926206,0.000026632913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034185674,0.000036559915,0.000047557503,0.00035919473,0.0008615196,0.0001687607,0.000020643232,0.00011495499,2.8756185e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014572808,0.000224849,0.37348953,0.000006355018,0.0000150634,4.7892723e-7,0.2715194,0.000018370578,0.0010586816,0.35197124,0.000058010093,0.0016234588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023762613,0.000013789901,0.8756911,0.000007225484,0.0000022070542,3.4335105e-7,0.074029125,0.0009911282,0.00008757077,0.04880398,0.00009776969,0.00003809512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011795156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052041754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055425477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105811254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884308069","doi":"10.1177/1043463118787498","title":"Adam Smith and the Buddha","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Indian and Buddhist Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Gautama Buddha; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Happiness; Buddhist philosophy; Adam smith; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0227485108746386,"score_gpt":0.21495778155365966,"score_spread":0.19220927067902105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884308069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54499024,0.0024147683,0.00011050436,0.024048852,0.0006440962,0.00031403423,0.00009623876,0.00007477023,0.42730647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815926,0.00017559856,0.00005633872,0.0031975259,0.0010574205,0.000006935344,0.000004584901,0.0000025544748,0.013906472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996677,0.00002516735,0.00007463618,0.00008350416,0.000078456615,0.00007051822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997536,0.000077509736,0.000023743858,0.00004997165,0.00007970791,0.000015468653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025666668,0.000050159957,0.00006895086,0.0000027942183,0.0013056934,0.0001273814,0.000028244125,0.000018751636,0.00035547887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013393369,0.000029244955,0.000042244887,0.000008243814,0.0018224609,0.00008295431,0.000028385239,0.000046693698,0.000011704948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008941671,0.0000073077804,0.0004108915,0.000011428207,0.000033756045,5.2399272e-8,0.07829189,3.344331e-8,7.528099e-7,0.89718294,0.02388067,0.00017131402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008929729,0.00003320577,0.019781569,0.000009356421,0.000025342477,0.0000018258443,0.012979924,0.00024207756,0.000010746336,0.035175674,0.9307296,0.0001176582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009736193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019429077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90684897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056874187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016310787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298395795","doi":"10.1177/10434631221130850","title":"Regulation and state capacity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rationality and Society","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Parallels; Offensive; State (computer science); Law and economics; Rent-seeking; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.044062406486211826,"score_gpt":0.27203355956071895,"score_spread":0.22797115307450713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298395795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98844415,0.000022318634,0.00035825276,0.0046178345,0.00010264985,0.00007641812,0.000014513573,0.000019197327,0.0063446523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446696,0.00007525666,0.0004525454,0.0007494894,0.000031287374,0.0000116149595,0.0000122611555,0.0000010790227,0.0041995253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996127,0.00006909901,0.000068551846,0.00008473343,0.000105883,0.000059023278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986345,0.000035445468,0.000025670379,0.000024443978,0.000015986956,0.00003501017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079961406,0.000023281353,0.000034998196,0.0000045655693,0.0011756975,0.0000357472,0.000019710698,0.00001226773,0.0006437778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012380421,0.000027614793,0.00001720995,0.000038033297,0.00009025642,0.00009387398,0.000031786487,0.000043726526,0.0000017816192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010954138,0.000057410827,0.048801128,0.000014624724,0.00003407566,1.5738522e-7,0.25639433,0.00022179348,0.00016203904,0.65656346,0.006405697,0.031334333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018952302,0.0000061765345,0.52773696,7.8248553e-7,0.0000024711417,7.714833e-7,0.011557188,0.001001195,0.0000031429902,0.02157758,0.4378376,0.00008660516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003299582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023406919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63498586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009805049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007182488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9042634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}