{"meta":{"query_hash":"ebc4789d1623","filters":{"venue":"Reading Research Quarterly"},"cohort_total":59,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":59,"exported":59,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ebc4789d1623","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Reading+Research+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1536377901","doi":"10.1002/rrq.013","title":"Understanding the Relative Contributions of Lower‐Level Word Processes, Higher‐Level Processes, and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension Performance in Proficient Adult Readers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Structural equation modeling; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Word recognition; Short-term memory; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2023258657908841,"score_gpt":0.38993186293484083,"score_spread":0.18760599714395673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536377901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992262,0.00011164939,0.0002477813,0.000038365866,0.0000015158677,0.0000018992454,0.000018657365,0.000003870154,0.0003500001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956423,0.00006452409,0.0002007451,0.000008336149,0.0000031238267,0.000002498985,0.000028256609,0.0000015873203,0.00012664517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997676,0.000083456296,0.000024700801,0.00004812254,0.000047802358,0.000028386206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883433,0.0092024,0.0013455554,0.000389017,0.00039240997,0.00032737217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001471769,0.00024936517,0.00025542398,0.0007367363,0.00013740089,0.0013394571,0.00024321987,0.00043194927,0.0023105347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013216086,0.00023538187,0.00020461438,0.00034748425,0.00044844724,0.0013094903,0.00052206084,0.00059953466,0.00020656818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021532997,0.00026180487,0.9498355,0.0000982038,0.00013896346,0.00013284084,0.0049586715,0.0007087748,0.008257395,0.00063300226,0.00013707505,0.034622457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008229167,0.00018404797,0.9932017,0.000018706765,0.000052768406,0.00013847458,0.001254041,0.0024099217,0.0014175678,0.0011689872,0.00013656117,0.0000090238655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013341627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018503704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023105347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015588244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021253465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077835917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546053610","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70","title":"Supporting Change in Literacy Instruction in Malawi","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; McGill University","keywords":"Coaching; Literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Intervention (counseling); Perception; Humanities; Art; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07172176611854,"score_gpt":0.45551904966948,"score_spread":0.38379728355094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546053610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98498625,0.0010137361,0.0010418196,0.00632439,0.000051648447,0.00028721057,0.000031859247,0.00005403778,0.006209025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967237,0.0005194458,0.0015096552,0.00048151426,0.000018340552,0.0001083485,0.000017690865,0.000003025015,0.00061836524],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971348,0.001448832,0.00009047276,0.00017256172,0.00036714575,0.00078613136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960127,0.0016152777,0.0007599542,0.00022555482,0.00039046578,0.0009960766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002592038,0.00023393323,0.00026850126,0.00063509226,0.0022959975,0.0020324886,0.000880108,0.0007517192,0.0020251444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009186226,0.00017634669,0.00023198129,0.00048212535,0.0017958593,0.0011179763,0.0041273753,0.0011546083,0.0001569623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043966805,0.0074474933,0.176902,0.0021808262,0.00015667162,0.0015560806,0.06973471,0.0011761006,0.00993729,0.0050315713,0.0031678358,0.7222697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042677365,0.004818966,0.85686123,0.001997582,0.0002358377,0.0005068268,0.075669184,0.0018618649,0.008829385,0.002895411,0.045823265,0.00007363331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020648075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05375381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020648075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002548161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008614892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04105574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677020752","doi":"10.1002/rrq.031","title":"Epistemological Tensions in Reading Research and a Vision for the Future","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Frame (networking); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Linguistics; Visual arts; Philosophy; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.20082151120271757,"score_gpt":0.5286859880498845,"score_spread":0.32786447684716696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677020752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01147082,0.28960222,0.01947124,0.55554104,0.009091286,0.00007129044,0.000048706992,0.000095180396,0.11460824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6671921,0.22203316,0.03189341,0.042867534,0.012426481,0.0007973474,0.00017181484,0.00019330397,0.022424905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608207,0.031064011,0.0012130728,0.0015082111,0.004397594,0.0009963957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9250903,0.06076461,0.0027056942,0.003135078,0.006192457,0.0021119246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05437649,0.000752465,0.0015770947,0.0068321167,0.007536523,0.030687775,0.0027482323,0.0061891084,0.003715049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044537924,0.0007300308,0.00059088663,0.004756963,0.075780265,0.041461673,0.009549143,0.014274108,0.0007477176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014107549,0.000019955563,0.00015904888,0.00035226787,0.000008652209,0.00006946833,0.015322199,0.00009367263,0.00006643899,0.9597811,0.0052446155,0.018868534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011042555,0.00001759886,0.00024929902,0.0017068867,0.0000072919133,0.000103177605,0.026164386,0.0001893666,0.00009036877,0.9036715,0.06777122,0.00001793654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002519982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027999256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010578286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012999066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2875738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1728407011","doi":"10.1002/rrq.69","title":"The Role of Acculturation in Reading a Second Language: Its Relation to English Literacy Skills in Immigrant Chinese Adolescents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Acculturation; Reading comprehension; Humanities; Fluency; Psychology; Literacy; Reading (process); Immigration; Pedagogy; Art; Mathematics education; Geography; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009095328512972116,"score_gpt":0.35248297008452995,"score_spread":0.3433876415715578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1728407011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999721,0.00005372453,0.0000041243575,0.000018088238,0.0000010249325,0.0000016355712,0.000008939949,2.3395172e-7,0.00019120672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999793,0.00005180262,0.000014501737,0.00000857981,0.000001727571,0.0000025731406,0.000019121528,3.9386848e-7,0.00010828539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996947,0.000076202814,0.000030071282,0.00004106284,0.00006568667,0.000092337315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830437,0.0004077729,0.00058263703,0.00006508895,0.00020019307,0.0004399563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060504867,0.00021222545,0.00016010371,0.0007595841,0.00074189994,0.0007019349,0.0002993551,0.00037932364,0.0016325293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023366816,0.00015157012,0.00032967023,0.00065842096,0.00064180593,0.00027442822,0.00050954515,0.0005320416,0.00010585368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023229504,0.00004177616,0.9972596,0.00000495185,0.000009671048,0.00010525818,0.0013496021,0.000007650465,0.00012938435,0.000021219113,0.000013561194,0.0010341025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.623756e-7,0.000027779115,0.99805284,0.000004520222,0.000005561087,0.000061280414,0.0017460006,0.000024906287,0.000027680342,0.0000064013516,0.000041158757,0.0000011734077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07396606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13478656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07396606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000689466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011715088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14707106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934607586","doi":"10.1002/rrq.95","title":"Development of English and French Language and Literacy Skills in EL1 and EL French Immersion Students in the Early Grades","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"French immersion; Literacy; Psychology; Early literacy; Primary education; Mathematics education; Emergent literacy; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01848180156450484,"score_gpt":0.3796549059763709,"score_spread":0.36117310441186606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934607586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995907,0.000049332626,0.000017667071,0.000008148424,0.000001285842,0.00000273493,0.000016738035,0.0000017520601,0.00031165834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844366,0.00007307381,0.000069689355,0.000024271805,0.0000020624086,0.000009763173,0.00008506066,0.0000027276653,0.0012897508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993291,0.00008058432,0.00005509731,0.0001199857,0.00018172275,0.00023351471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831617,0.00028366348,0.00043108396,0.00006567119,0.0004958404,0.00040764068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010092378,0.0005114697,0.00072206464,0.0017228132,0.0008407984,0.0019725938,0.00045472643,0.0006699357,0.002354543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025796131,0.00024954756,0.00042305078,0.0005020531,0.00084013806,0.000924213,0.0013881591,0.00064247334,0.0007019435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003578377,0.0010004778,0.9133121,0.00008742061,0.00007485066,0.001368822,0.031464085,0.000086931854,0.009993489,0.00025466058,0.0002493036,0.04175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000936914,0.0009655837,0.98197454,0.000028800061,0.000022913788,0.0006600607,0.013092586,0.000071058756,0.0018371161,0.0000756141,0.0012437392,0.000018450257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010633994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01801171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010633994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008233755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060923153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021144211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962109311","doi":"10.1002/rrq.006","title":"Multilingual Practices, Critical Literacies, and Visual Culture: A Focus on African Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Visual literacy; Critical literacy; Multilingualism; Linguistics; Focus (optics); Power (physics); Diversity (politics); Relevance (law); Psychology; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Political science","score_opus":0.15040641614791095,"score_gpt":0.4209840058183819,"score_spread":0.27057758967047096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962109311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20157698,0.293681,0.0023629891,0.05483286,0.0014253292,0.000048654038,0.000041987147,0.00003218781,0.445998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93129724,0.052280243,0.00040782726,0.002260772,0.0007072746,0.000059204747,0.000010761747,0.0000283925,0.012948251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977501,0.0016124321,0.000055422464,0.00010610018,0.00022490066,0.00025100802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512684,0.0038408549,0.00048745124,0.00010262073,0.00027764123,0.0001646442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002217456,0.0004929751,0.0003687898,0.0026519746,0.006083493,0.009774092,0.00064976694,0.0016231317,0.004980372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050090724,0.00015951962,0.00015541968,0.0026269485,0.018984497,0.0083509,0.004303274,0.0026237448,0.00026187152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024134835,0.000035277328,0.0011180271,0.0008799179,0.000010213399,0.0011836356,0.4249531,0.00011345311,0.00043350767,0.53816456,0.009112903,0.023971234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008594789,0.00003310994,0.00423819,0.004857964,0.000019265986,0.0010312153,0.4560627,0.00014437824,0.0008698556,0.045907315,0.4868059,0.000021504753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00706214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009774092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034984332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017467552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025383055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975212230","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.2.3","title":"How Will Literacy Be Assessed in the Next Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Snippet; Mathematics education; Psychology; Phonics; Standardized test; Pedagogy; Computer science; Primary education","score_opus":0.09343138122749,"score_gpt":0.41493676861864465,"score_spread":0.32150538739115464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975212230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018635962,0.03226094,0.0050861,0.8847671,0.015122475,0.00009046505,0.0013630425,0.00025528096,0.042418692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47908533,0.0891441,0.04059844,0.34029412,0.014030449,0.0013988805,0.003043628,0.00029726024,0.03210769],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954782,0.0023171133,0.0005395214,0.0002990477,0.0010244919,0.0003417165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97940445,0.0069943154,0.0019641866,0.0005988163,0.008547438,0.0024907887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018121738,0.00035029178,0.0005047926,0.0019032321,0.0011679472,0.004185981,0.00068374246,0.0029123512,0.0038946893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06147258,0.00019648777,0.00041220768,0.0013412813,0.0019120651,0.007949921,0.0022875986,0.0049536633,0.002361464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016473337,0.00022472492,0.056829955,0.0007746122,0.00008643038,0.00021725903,0.0013173324,0.00036251594,0.0007369554,0.05913076,0.33244947,0.5477053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005576014,0.00062738697,0.11082348,0.004913264,0.00010587361,0.00076332456,0.0067565558,0.00096200197,0.0013210031,0.05388885,0.8195884,0.00019406434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007977282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010159712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018121738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022442578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003735564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09583801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984129771","doi":"10.1598/rrq.46.2.5","title":"Issues in Second‐Language Reading: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Humanities; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07792822985849499,"score_gpt":0.4213477156598346,"score_spread":0.34341948580133963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984129771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063322775,0.20388278,0.0056514987,0.39734036,0.0045964825,0.00011649858,0.000088691035,0.00013246862,0.32486844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466361,0.08626978,0.003728815,0.009163052,0.0027697426,0.00026725512,0.00008160037,0.0000720072,0.05101172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968058,0.0020662833,0.00015979329,0.0002474285,0.00044954944,0.0002711876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799171,0.015713144,0.0010334058,0.00047652857,0.001853618,0.001006222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057645165,0.0005492967,0.0007233812,0.0021267466,0.0045321714,0.016805356,0.0014341294,0.0058526793,0.008897795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012351773,0.0002975508,0.00041526908,0.0027972749,0.015406407,0.011012034,0.0036192413,0.0054862425,0.0012098587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012899468,0.00067568757,0.005485218,0.0013050608,0.000017683575,0.002260483,0.08716309,0.0007061143,0.00076196453,0.68642575,0.035667725,0.17940222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004152692,0.00019401479,0.012593386,0.0030934871,0.000018923249,0.0010038023,0.16172485,0.0010645855,0.0012350492,0.49683124,0.32211906,0.00008020387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007123472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005857036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016805356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008912352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05211687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984970179","doi":"10.1598/rrq.42.1.1","title":"Learning to read and write genre‐specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Degree (music); Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05365785034518521,"score_gpt":0.42353547721036394,"score_spread":0.3698776268651787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984970179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986374,0.000023793527,0.00034417826,0.000013756617,0.0000011709293,0.000007982117,0.00001031609,0.000005423573,0.0009558981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999065,0.000028750133,0.00062084274,0.000004883173,0.0000011367233,0.000013415139,0.00001539478,0.0000030721017,0.00024743416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970824,0.0016363473,0.00018677417,0.0003124227,0.0006202114,0.00016190973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408486,0.041066695,0.00859523,0.005439535,0.0024892252,0.0015606764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00462829,0.0002068309,0.00026489547,0.00039310855,0.0004000001,0.0019034576,0.000516922,0.00028368775,0.0017972157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035549864,0.000233213,0.0002301966,0.00026886477,0.0013320753,0.0014075482,0.0017571995,0.0007898919,0.00018449494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010580558,0.0029630046,0.696294,0.00040603676,0.000116973046,0.0008697803,0.07022741,0.0012439758,0.044961195,0.00634196,0.00031735437,0.17520037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003818789,0.0017275608,0.95513046,0.00019792929,0.00007258477,0.00059042213,0.016389461,0.0024585363,0.017849779,0.0035912318,0.0019003868,0.00005359349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000794955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010656249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00462829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039165144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081755174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024477005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988939986","doi":"10.1598/rrq.44.2.2","title":"The Dimensionality of Phonological Abilities in Greek","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Rasch model; Phonological awareness; Orthography; Construct validity; Scale (ratio); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Literacy; Psychometrics; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.07381013224796533,"score_gpt":0.4177407468599912,"score_spread":0.34393061461202584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988939986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99867475,0.00007271854,0.0003818597,0.000020758014,0.0000026491339,0.000009313336,0.000043000327,0.000005859558,0.0007891224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932253,0.00004530574,0.00049561256,0.000003299508,0.0000012186207,0.000009236031,0.000043221724,0.0000015053583,0.000078198995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875736,0.00026619353,0.00026485627,0.0001916293,0.0004376869,0.00008218107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461937,0.002132245,0.0016551617,0.00070016814,0.00070083153,0.00019214819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013979066,0.00043463465,0.000459683,0.0022731512,0.00030186222,0.0014091416,0.0002698028,0.0002884832,0.001021042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009338763,0.0002509139,0.00043709247,0.0012431885,0.001206488,0.0006914608,0.0016364673,0.0005555737,0.000117781645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059246006,0.000058657333,0.931407,0.0001226424,0.00015994653,0.00057658146,0.008363341,0.0009749557,0.0070645493,0.0016681583,0.00018162279,0.049363416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004788759,0.00008811174,0.9911509,0.00004741292,0.000032605418,0.0009339988,0.0024527393,0.0013467037,0.0010551001,0.0022004568,0.0006664957,0.000020696072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010647308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011864009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022731512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029490874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055735366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007392943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990289074","doi":"10.1598/rrq.45.3.4","title":"Naming Speed and Reading: From Prediction to Instruction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":341,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Phonological awareness; Humanities; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03915748973438768,"score_gpt":0.3759477141845761,"score_spread":0.33679022445018847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990289074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785124,0.0013918018,0.0075010043,0.00059229473,0.00006940781,0.000060391194,0.00037720456,0.00026129367,0.011234233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747473,0.00029687356,0.0015649578,0.000021760341,0.00002335265,0.000026694755,0.00017220734,0.000021608283,0.00039783967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798465,0.0011074496,0.00011797704,0.00026499154,0.00042216698,0.000102708065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134375,0.07406042,0.006093951,0.0022931674,0.003340001,0.00077497325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046984437,0.0005301779,0.0005503443,0.001756682,0.00023094384,0.0020203604,0.0006797192,0.0008017634,0.0037069886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0701555,0.00034864678,0.0005231126,0.0010128316,0.00087399204,0.0020683205,0.0009253417,0.00150086,0.00075652334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050290866,0.0004318481,0.90715307,0.00013960009,0.00015901803,0.00012263996,0.00084418047,0.0075606206,0.0005934959,0.0015350323,0.00068103947,0.08027651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043564396,0.00075822434,0.9305304,0.00024340273,0.00015351303,0.00021450757,0.0007825929,0.05292381,0.002507411,0.011066504,0.000720291,0.0000557322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004088885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016545036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046984437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006645135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008586056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024848044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006392742","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.4.6","title":"The Role of Knowledge in Early Literacy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; Princeton University; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Comprehension; Literacy; Reading comprehension; Adult literacy; Sociology; Odds; Psychology; Pedagogy; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03654070737238409,"score_gpt":0.4078192068284299,"score_spread":0.37127849945604585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006392742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3131971,0.11486978,0.0030404055,0.02288267,0.00029003964,0.00003422089,0.00028962418,0.000052369174,0.5453438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94750226,0.020238284,0.0011324197,0.00067104487,0.00010511383,0.00003324472,0.00007231247,0.000016726319,0.030228555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996056,0.0001781369,0.000012607842,0.00004909007,0.00009150789,0.00006303007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964224,0.0026183233,0.00029750625,0.000082603154,0.00030209156,0.00027707737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061879714,0.00014848876,0.00022041777,0.00073364313,0.00058997754,0.002649921,0.0002871789,0.00044910773,0.006594949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624867,0.00016266303,0.000118190495,0.00051450304,0.0022889117,0.0026616696,0.001235259,0.0012224918,0.0005542833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022849138,0.00033475482,0.07815845,0.0008627798,0.00006292088,0.0021895359,0.03024038,0.0006769924,0.0018531231,0.33137238,0.02090993,0.5331102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033512384,0.00040659442,0.3771427,0.0032522823,0.00013303128,0.0032724645,0.021903438,0.0012719029,0.0022781412,0.38108128,0.20913807,0.0000866265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00392849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006593147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006594949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001066608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097303785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022062302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007867453","doi":"10.1598/rrq.41.2.3","title":"Dialogic narratives of literacy, teaching, and schooling: Preparing literacy teachers for diverse settings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Literacy; Pedagogy; Narrative; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Internship; Diversity (politics); Reading (process); Teacher education; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.07074954043479754,"score_gpt":0.5086552986787163,"score_spread":0.43790575824391875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007867453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8593773,0.0038079682,0.009983607,0.03262416,0.00023645801,0.00014197505,0.00010642225,0.00008813371,0.09363404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408734,0.000626638,0.00094309787,0.0005134194,0.000025987867,0.00005617637,0.00002053004,0.00002081279,0.0037059616],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274313,0.0059203147,0.00018973998,0.00029476677,0.00043842493,0.00041361825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989974,0.0067157205,0.00089297123,0.00034099695,0.00045670662,0.0016195917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207154,0.0003697845,0.0003148225,0.001314637,0.016117008,0.010504302,0.0012379315,0.001999062,0.0026569574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012986232,0.00041539635,0.00020133657,0.0009844862,0.015923254,0.010095985,0.011763206,0.0035142645,0.00040255525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008633421,0.000015128864,0.0012638627,0.00002419814,0.0000014076144,0.0003542058,0.97378755,0.00003074728,0.00017096467,0.019558921,0.0009508364,0.0038336618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051215447,0.000013339411,0.00073133165,0.00010359938,0.0000025480622,0.0001656935,0.9530418,0.00007452298,0.00026016854,0.005345172,0.04024853,0.000008244848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041722287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007825905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016117008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049583004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006001453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043404102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020107345","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.3.5","title":"What Will Be the Social Implications and Interactions of Schooling in the Next Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snippet; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11433614965617431,"score_gpt":0.4729241195001972,"score_spread":0.35858796984402286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020107345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07447866,0.0071023693,0.0012773838,0.7344173,0.0013602257,0.000019511146,0.000867809,0.00003378646,0.18044293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941155,0.011448207,0.0009196762,0.027824352,0.0016312387,0.00007588935,0.00026470106,0.00004341838,0.016637525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873334,0.00067795493,0.000020768382,0.00007884687,0.00012479605,0.00036435795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963007,0.0018819799,0.0005349828,0.000086784086,0.00048102264,0.00071460445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019403083,0.00018952232,0.00026640447,0.0013985931,0.002755719,0.0063929567,0.00052946,0.0024786086,0.016435375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007217366,0.000121642406,0.0003407703,0.0016154058,0.0045557246,0.0074332687,0.0019110735,0.002472275,0.0011609526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104540035,0.000110362795,0.03728201,0.00038432004,0.000048100956,0.0004987319,0.016326342,0.0009939603,0.00039156928,0.7460802,0.11283265,0.08494716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023038043,0.00007179385,0.09554087,0.0007702962,0.000033523895,0.00029123574,0.08673077,0.0009719504,0.0005215451,0.51499856,0.2999449,0.00010157206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013863896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026287219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016435375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032427162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025465204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054981828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067316683","doi":"10.1598/rrq.45.4.4","title":"Teaching Argument and Explanation to Prepare Junior Students for Writing to Learn","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thames Valley Children's Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics education; Teaching method; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06365108727258365,"score_gpt":0.48616218599494465,"score_spread":0.42251109872236103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067316683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675135,0.00015315723,0.02610457,0.0003509932,0.00011669414,0.00086178776,0.000040169045,0.00037900347,0.0044801086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87664187,0.00040264265,0.11723377,0.00018965894,0.00004831036,0.001041503,0.000112895636,0.00005992984,0.0042695003],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909794,0.00034935147,0.00009693788,0.00014165064,0.00022381193,0.000090319765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922788,0.0048224903,0.0010352302,0.0004879064,0.0004945228,0.0008810099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022388666,0.0005323879,0.0006305847,0.00058822153,0.0005372656,0.0014469911,0.0012145299,0.0007815634,0.0049164062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091731455,0.00030113786,0.00040392837,0.00025214226,0.00042113406,0.00087527756,0.0009068366,0.0011610112,0.0011951927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001887117,0.035591926,0.031811416,0.002165692,0.00007125444,0.00097340863,0.01220896,0.0040085865,0.13986357,0.0038288594,0.0046713348,0.7629179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006765091,0.09661116,0.2081606,0.0024913999,0.000714039,0.0035702703,0.018601509,0.052520104,0.46109858,0.02418778,0.12485953,0.00041997875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013271908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000250429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049164062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037585865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012644201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016447008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076250769","doi":"10.1598/rrq.37.2.4","title":"The expertise of literacy teachers: A continuum from preschool to Grade 5","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.07080091642741987,"score_gpt":0.4034184816565816,"score_spread":0.33261756522916175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076250769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970047,0.00018849349,0.000118468364,0.00013009504,0.0000033926008,0.000024740719,0.00009635774,0.000014162286,0.0024195325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879175,0.000118440556,0.00031055097,0.00004605186,0.0000025769898,0.000037069654,0.00013325294,0.0000026087494,0.00055773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895346,0.00013938812,0.00013829443,0.00012415065,0.0002982975,0.00034645663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507385,0.0008244334,0.0012371374,0.00012521938,0.0015813634,0.0011580131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015206779,0.00024448955,0.00038510255,0.003473218,0.0012310265,0.0023537984,0.00061204046,0.0007177315,0.0014571513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071477275,0.00030840718,0.0003285041,0.0009954068,0.00085067144,0.0014564603,0.0035514273,0.00080741936,0.0003424018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013501423,0.00026710087,0.88742244,0.00018904774,0.000019435383,0.00076794904,0.07356181,0.00010148859,0.003473499,0.00066182157,0.0011431174,0.032257233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006251718,0.00035239675,0.93845624,0.00019781283,0.000010964482,0.00041678062,0.05605747,0.00016113448,0.0008505297,0.00036782812,0.0031044781,0.000018047007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009412856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016383694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009412856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001579103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020662616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018716156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098709039","doi":"10.1598/rrq.44.3.5","title":"Shaping New Literacies Research: Extrapolations From a Review of the Handbook of Research on New Literacies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Literacy; Sociology; Library science; Art; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6055139591330078,"score_gpt":0.5318540950288034,"score_spread":0.07365986410420433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098709039","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007026847,0.98506725,0.000794487,0.006382736,0.0013066793,0.00002213812,0.000049561295,0.000014570424,0.005659886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006821513,0.98595226,0.0015976392,0.0034952522,0.0009227681,0.000077963545,0.00009446535,0.000036385758,0.0010017102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892464,0.005588181,0.0013148913,0.00084646797,0.002616434,0.00038757676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91705126,0.07086361,0.0028328,0.0013019805,0.0070489226,0.0009014084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012960031,0.0011597046,0.002259513,0.024182886,0.00162974,0.011364328,0.0014747841,0.003165171,0.0030008743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03896315,0.00094171916,0.0011154006,0.026521714,0.005335924,0.014426534,0.003755553,0.0041674096,0.0014426269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111201145,0.0000735416,0.0014301222,0.05967956,0.00024648535,0.00051879825,0.035315543,0.0005700787,0.0005837024,0.09664953,0.12969655,0.67512494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017460805,0.00009499302,0.002925994,0.1224936,0.00014428195,0.00071623747,0.019504944,0.00019115327,0.0003433176,0.024185164,0.8293093,0.000073457995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052588712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012105715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024182886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062188227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011160404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06854004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133526395","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.3.2","title":"Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read: Evidence From the National Reading Panel's Meta‐Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1463,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Phonemic awareness; Phonics; Reading (process); Psychology; Phonological awareness; Meta-analysis; Cognitive psychology; Primary education; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.22592793093124172,"score_gpt":0.4431507052678233,"score_spread":0.21722277433658158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133526395","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014230237,0.983032,0.00057514745,0.0003172279,0.00021947807,0.00031409113,0.0005698352,0.00004142436,0.0007005952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36494264,0.62854046,0.0024332174,0.001194337,0.00035332746,0.0010013502,0.000883863,0.000057380246,0.00059340097],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893863,0.005281617,0.0029101495,0.001110484,0.0010654173,0.00024597076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97509766,0.019129327,0.0033256959,0.0007653682,0.0014374105,0.0002445401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014632085,0.0024848862,0.010866444,0.004359775,0.0005707529,0.0035128735,0.00202707,0.0024008513,0.004375657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041696284,0.0014760133,0.02687808,0.0039424864,0.0008809235,0.0019259097,0.0013005338,0.002405155,0.00040914034],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005836166,0.000071285074,0.0029086308,0.2727679,0.6960662,0.000104507046,0.0001760123,0.00030875375,0.00031417765,0.00012939426,0.00076544634,0.020551471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014492478,0.0003978154,0.00544431,0.025500767,0.96491444,0.00007105338,0.000061793275,0.00010062335,0.00026087492,0.00016372143,0.0016126782,0.00002275946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069287424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013845557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014632085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021412717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002224012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0773828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136227657","doi":"10.1598/rrq.43.2.2","title":"The Influence of Reading Skills on the Missing‐Letter Effect Among Elementary School Students","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Humanities; Disengagement theory; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02478861075547189,"score_gpt":0.3828286074422796,"score_spread":0.3580399966868077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136227657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997105,0.000037357513,0.000031626514,0.00001362123,0.0000015442832,0.0000016520629,0.000029582367,0.000003635216,0.0001703634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99986064,0.0000091819265,0.000028579898,0.000004786531,0.0000012661184,0.0000012379877,0.000020995883,0.0000015864379,0.0000716521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893206,0.00025776884,0.00014303226,0.00023090698,0.00030965143,0.0001266449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801287,0.012469003,0.0041544656,0.0010376787,0.0010309082,0.0011791805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010141617,0.00035095395,0.00053719495,0.0011535638,0.00035597797,0.00077387004,0.00036399515,0.0006278277,0.0027485003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011671748,0.00036378752,0.00040816644,0.00047515583,0.00076263904,0.00045534066,0.0005151697,0.0007346919,0.00042776152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003376765,0.00022513473,0.99110377,0.000019825056,0.00006219759,0.00018504425,0.0006104923,0.00004997307,0.0031797795,0.000030068159,0.000055391643,0.004140599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030800443,0.00018537027,0.9989435,0.0000030692395,0.000014316389,0.00012700047,0.00016342665,0.0000743749,0.0004273385,0.00002382487,0.000032092903,0.0000026414175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002140412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002865098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027485003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001986871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002533056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0091946125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158418180","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.1.5","title":"How Will Literacy Be Defined in the New Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snippet; Literacy; Diversity (politics); Mathematics education; Critical literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.054153741979785404,"score_gpt":0.3880990483623227,"score_spread":0.3339453063825373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158418180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03348467,0.07195242,0.004121934,0.6710613,0.009924524,0.000032289037,0.0002767242,0.00007753054,0.20906872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8018889,0.04883354,0.00521401,0.09735261,0.0053682714,0.0002296868,0.0003231003,0.00015637965,0.040633436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982796,0.000842858,0.00012033799,0.00020883177,0.00024851804,0.00029996617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975197,0.0010153092,0.00034895967,0.00011766033,0.0004904291,0.00050787476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034879078,0.0002516571,0.00029807468,0.0013540785,0.0025859566,0.008031075,0.00047268948,0.0018379786,0.0046991194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010462187,0.0001117268,0.00020870075,0.0011428017,0.007825905,0.014600562,0.0035086533,0.004775526,0.0009552781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031738135,0.000021672404,0.0029929075,0.0001550563,0.000008527975,0.00012027205,0.010960686,0.00006184241,0.00018493255,0.8575185,0.058694314,0.069249585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006744533,0.000049996015,0.0061208927,0.00087928784,0.000006606946,0.00025669552,0.027962236,0.00012111938,0.0003057608,0.2696635,0.69458634,0.000040862455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002496576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032121697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008031075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024632625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020608972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018446088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161547889","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.1.1","title":"Access to Print in Low‐Income and Middle‐Income Communities: An Ecological Study of Four Neighborhoods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":508,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Harvard University; American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Low income; Variety (cybernetics); Early literacy; Sociology; Geography; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.17692506354047158,"score_gpt":0.4348460564145016,"score_spread":0.25792099287403003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161547889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968004,0.0000150181595,0.000018092223,0.0000109014745,5.127711e-7,0.00001145572,0.00002738467,8.078894e-7,0.00023585606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938476,0.000033253415,0.00010691322,0.000025954183,0.0000014463453,0.000031365533,0.000081364306,0.0000017337633,0.00033323874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931574,0.00020944006,0.0000310893,0.00010209201,0.000094453535,0.0002471917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892163,0.0001702431,0.00016900108,0.000066934575,0.00021525896,0.00045697574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070599304,0.00025468617,0.0004708859,0.0018033191,0.0063211657,0.0014220136,0.00077222503,0.00049057836,0.0016071659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015367592,0.0005176885,0.00038022673,0.0016182762,0.001407969,0.0008887508,0.0021290812,0.0007753264,0.0002545388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005322471,0.0014618521,0.87350154,0.00005869452,0.000055285567,0.0009074298,0.11190392,0.000085101,0.0019573863,0.00039711932,0.00045193825,0.008687515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018626171,0.00048106807,0.8835384,0.000022679349,0.00002958173,0.00025117578,0.113993645,0.00013823702,0.00025746794,0.00011709143,0.001128516,0.00002336992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1584828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3433986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1584828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021181642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013968699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31512064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309039982","doi":"10.1002/rrq.139","title":"First‐Language Longitudinal Predictors of Second‐Language Literacy in Young L2 Learners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Reading (process); Literacy; Longitudinal study; Cognition; Linguistics; Rhyme; Phonemic awareness; Learning to read; Word recognition; Metalinguistics; Developmental psychology; Vocabulary development; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.027461094669164087,"score_gpt":0.37557339981132276,"score_spread":0.3481123051421587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309039982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982446,0.000021847552,0.000008560326,0.000007780489,7.2350565e-7,0.000002029987,0.00005276231,8.520209e-7,0.00008094963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996111,0.000025230653,0.000021623462,0.0000061581854,9.849282e-7,0.000004864117,0.00011822172,0.0000010866237,0.000210752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997836,0.000040397208,0.000026830237,0.00004282172,0.000043468863,0.000062940075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729025,0.00057449355,0.00078507746,0.00012739172,0.0005007941,0.0007220385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096753,0.00024228412,0.00022369131,0.0007309901,0.000513075,0.00092783396,0.00027280097,0.00046761616,0.0021696205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027258887,0.0002833558,0.00035285013,0.00048156045,0.0003288779,0.0006034867,0.00060962705,0.0008943749,0.0006068381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022348358,0.000056819485,0.99858934,0.000002474791,0.0000067451483,0.0000516726,0.000505396,0.000012960983,0.00018982467,0.000008050282,0.000024382583,0.0005298942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001720498,0.000078721845,0.99864477,0.0000042437955,0.0000052146443,0.00006136561,0.0008784997,0.000091370246,0.00014973426,0.000011221174,0.00007007398,0.0000031114728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02339209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024691815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02339209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003658578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055125385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04651183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543361460","doi":"","title":"International Reports on Literary Research: Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literary criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.08907368780371366,"score_gpt":0.39124585306398224,"score_spread":0.3021721652602686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543361460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01120015,0.052107453,0.00071144156,0.10159932,0.013769524,0.00031931596,0.06657684,0.00097437104,0.7527415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035209943,0.03494334,0.0009986457,0.0022093707,0.0013404685,0.00012721709,0.01276029,0.0003641421,0.9120465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908139,0.0004350518,0.00048207305,0.00047166095,0.006207853,0.0015894673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417318,0.0032832585,0.0012652453,0.0013261694,0.045152664,0.007240808],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048523145,0.0013718675,0.0013807701,0.019639906,0.014419268,0.017010191,0.0021921322,0.0030645616,0.13946204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017998435,0.0008187964,0.0007288602,0.041902363,0.0039702477,0.0036582612,0.0034559222,0.0035691403,0.017717492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027565246,0.000024331304,0.001787317,0.00021774619,0.000008771658,0.00004885635,0.00085463346,0.00008458777,0.00007109106,0.011584658,0.9604973,0.024793115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066477096,0.0000055677283,0.0076727383,0.00024234972,0.0000103720495,0.000017927006,0.0014137556,0.000044619144,0.00010110099,0.0005231605,0.9899456,0.000016126081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99286616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098770894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36852637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71663636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607695438","doi":"10.1002/rrq.189","title":"Reading‐Related Causal Attributions for Success and Failure: Dynamic Links With Reading Skill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Brock University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Reading (process); Fluency; Reading comprehension; Phonological awareness; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Literacy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037301860076271315,"score_gpt":0.40427564731657395,"score_spread":0.3669737872403026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607695438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991504,0.000040744024,0.0003696426,0.000040007897,0.0000016234195,0.000004335444,0.000039205723,0.000004958859,0.0003489291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997737,0.000014461599,0.00010729943,0.0000055775117,0.000002437027,0.0000025394345,0.00004334462,0.0000016506302,0.000049068603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.00051344075,0.000081837235,0.0002553097,0.00027905192,0.00015709864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96360195,0.021187862,0.0100411335,0.0025757102,0.001499969,0.0010933273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660582,0.00030783023,0.0002752122,0.001077173,0.0004416933,0.0012144494,0.00036713618,0.00039343565,0.0021775817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035984676,0.00024116978,0.0003830642,0.00063954823,0.0014114502,0.0010169898,0.0012988712,0.0010809776,0.00017237192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002765123,0.000032841315,0.996716,0.0000039230204,0.000026003365,0.000026327982,0.00043040141,0.000099447505,0.00012699844,0.00011373834,0.000021524986,0.0023752698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024817643,0.000034512563,0.9978042,0.000004507956,0.000017473627,0.00007659101,0.000485016,0.0006950758,0.00016032417,0.00065893296,0.00005568922,0.000005061056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035301598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035329491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003660582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003260184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034148383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019359171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744221549","doi":"10.1002/rrq.199","title":"“I'll Show You How to Write My Name”: The Contribution of Naturalistic Sibling Teaching to the Home Literacy Environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Spelling; Literacy; Vocabulary; Psychology; Reading (process); Sibling; Meaning (existential); Developmental psychology; Naturalism; Vocabulary development; Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04528609023466993,"score_gpt":0.39633144197274356,"score_spread":0.3510453517380736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744221549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989084,0.00009199363,0.000121144396,0.000066730376,0.0000036865,0.0000050015906,0.00000783902,0.0000028577072,0.00079229614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.00007884792,0.00033078212,0.000025959735,0.0000017730971,0.000008838236,0.000013727179,0.0000025751558,0.00025641115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981554,0.0010773088,0.000056410452,0.0002125563,0.0003099216,0.00018836798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975568,0.0007718215,0.00063129346,0.00024233772,0.00036600663,0.00043166985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020284392,0.00018852852,0.00022223088,0.0005793585,0.0015484632,0.0008922138,0.0006085806,0.00029031164,0.0014663271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006439414,0.00026684473,0.0002003624,0.00027390048,0.0015850283,0.00056200725,0.001466677,0.0004214041,0.000097762095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020224831,0.00056180864,0.7969765,0.00008688319,0.000057372417,0.006019954,0.14972009,0.00014351663,0.0053001214,0.0018228727,0.0010519109,0.038056705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018453165,0.00048613283,0.841963,0.000105002444,0.00005994293,0.007909037,0.1404175,0.00055402174,0.002256225,0.0013214278,0.0048607117,0.000048552887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019969836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04808222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019969836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001293729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017892936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039707184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759664057","doi":"10.1002/rrq.205","title":"Different Measures of Print Exposure Predict Different Aspects of Vocabulary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Vocabulary; Checklist; Psychology; Reading (process); Developmental psychology; Nonverbal communication; Vocabulary development; Exploratory factor analysis; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Teaching method; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.09636295835396823,"score_gpt":0.38958874943272626,"score_spread":0.293225791078758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759664057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951696,0.00003774877,0.00007157114,0.0000045218862,0.0000010909612,0.0000026428884,0.000031924454,0.0000025270137,0.0003310508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959165,0.00003158493,0.0001004464,0.000004527977,0.0000013901504,0.0000045908164,0.000069485155,0.0000015422306,0.00019468108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966156,0.000069034184,0.000038212092,0.00007462638,0.000108721244,0.000047822137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954776,0.0019509415,0.001602992,0.00021538534,0.00030143347,0.0004516301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005616739,0.00041977395,0.0001877686,0.0010721302,0.00014556163,0.00061919476,0.00019871687,0.00033402053,0.0027797853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056984886,0.00026231183,0.00026493435,0.00037599233,0.00039531037,0.00040096638,0.00069087057,0.0004441879,0.00033098692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453178,0.000041432366,0.9955806,0.000006589644,0.000024819325,0.000054443066,0.00033964572,0.00005647481,0.001134762,0.000019890578,0.00002357377,0.0026832125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.596145e-7,0.00003014313,0.99952054,0.0000029968753,0.0000039101087,0.000041333165,0.00013621882,0.000088522705,0.00013369614,0.000017639772,0.000022682578,0.0000013876052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030404963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003782211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030404963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012892189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012684983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009299278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808941137","doi":"10.1002/rrq.219","title":"Inferring Meaning From Meaningful Parts: The Contributions of Morphological Skills to the Development of Children's Reading Comprehension","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Comprehension; Reading (process); Meaning (existential); Vocabulary development; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04790437941204884,"score_gpt":0.3850245340826453,"score_spread":0.3371201546705965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808941137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911076,0.00005373435,0.00031657,0.000020403237,0.0000015808428,0.0000023634009,0.00002291555,0.0000075806024,0.00046413552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926907,0.0000661145,0.00041354503,0.0000048038974,0.0000011462761,0.0000041584376,0.000030256466,0.0000047382723,0.00020602591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975425,0.000077505174,0.000018235789,0.000046864498,0.000075289696,0.000027847764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932728,0.004235868,0.0015634428,0.0002716369,0.00041139175,0.0002448602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007054758,0.00030640955,0.00014152912,0.0007079931,0.00015186582,0.0009914114,0.00023407041,0.00024345281,0.0019340209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011036161,0.00023782204,0.00016987062,0.0002812878,0.0006886596,0.00082013564,0.0005099448,0.0006622438,0.00019714104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028886923,0.00033141644,0.87803566,0.00012741394,0.00006910668,0.000985667,0.008798251,0.0012183081,0.035082456,0.0011872282,0.00029740873,0.073578216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003792215,0.00019283974,0.9897069,0.000025628413,0.00003848429,0.00037219326,0.0014484832,0.0014942208,0.0054412875,0.0009276846,0.00033546708,0.000013050773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003688764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004417812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003688764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017578679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004522975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00733459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852458049","doi":"10.1002/rrq.220","title":"Investigating Linguistically Diverse Adolescents’ Literacy Trajectories Using Latent Transition Modeling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Latent class model; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11549804313377386,"score_gpt":0.419368663664922,"score_spread":0.3038706205311481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852458049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948291,0.00004979491,0.004266539,0.00009294756,0.0000053881945,0.000037671754,0.00038787271,0.00001780007,0.00031298684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965837,0.00004410515,0.0021498897,0.0000129526525,0.0000018402997,0.00009763948,0.0008452363,0.000007698859,0.00025701453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824655,0.0010309335,0.00009983948,0.000269054,0.00012479247,0.00022875509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566674,0.0023434623,0.0007792077,0.00044975916,0.00039027544,0.00037058152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385781,0.00046163576,0.00053331326,0.0019955842,0.0011464952,0.002406613,0.0008036493,0.00057547854,0.003029714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894494,0.00046448372,0.0015467346,0.0018295209,0.00045288148,0.0014663467,0.0025313895,0.0020260033,0.0004712788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018423062,0.0005313845,0.975503,0.00002674943,0.00018245364,0.00010282828,0.0038939598,0.002932314,0.0003211011,0.001686485,0.0004052983,0.01423028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062711966,0.0006858117,0.8433156,0.00020185972,0.00021623242,0.00018410376,0.018432993,0.1270749,0.0008203678,0.0066902977,0.0022420324,0.00007311014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023878345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022590945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023878345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010074505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011801836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047478676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905973569","doi":"10.1002/rrq.240","title":"Preservice Teacher Knowledge, Print Exposure, and Planning for Instruction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Knowledge level; Lesson plan; Relation (database); Language arts; Literacy; Plan (archaeology); Pedagogy; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08768900833088598,"score_gpt":0.4391027739527477,"score_spread":0.3514137656218617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905973569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99902916,0.0000918262,0.00005848931,0.000017616394,6.571829e-7,0.0000033714941,0.000011073877,0.0000024929664,0.00078532443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.0000767702,0.000084129715,0.0000072634084,0.0000015455681,0.000003239815,0.000017832346,7.094918e-7,0.00027436076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950004,0.0001206775,0.000046527497,0.00007219065,0.00018178279,0.00007879558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98652494,0.0067329733,0.004462446,0.0005584051,0.0007199194,0.0010012918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073168497,0.00012962699,0.00017794372,0.00072688644,0.00031408173,0.00092555466,0.00030064903,0.00033146123,0.003795249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009305628,0.00018802407,0.00015316755,0.00037574937,0.0005220636,0.00041516437,0.0005728746,0.00056518783,0.00030739763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006486732,0.00056490273,0.97389954,0.000038886763,0.000023496057,0.00025001922,0.0035313512,0.00015043435,0.0013189864,0.000092308466,0.00011219212,0.019953035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037775428,0.00023643342,0.9963523,0.000023107948,0.0000131002425,0.0002598829,0.0021105069,0.00013793157,0.00045879337,0.00012019252,0.0002799017,0.000004008087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020527616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036477246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003795249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030305778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003445502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012696326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945523118","doi":"10.1002/rrq.257","title":"The Role of Awareness of Cross‐Language Suffix Correspondences in Second‐Language Reading Comprehension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Suffix; Linguistics; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary; Psychology; Reading (process); Computer science","score_opus":0.027211689601034674,"score_gpt":0.4066509382764872,"score_spread":0.37943924867545253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945523118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999353,0.000032175452,0.00009624449,0.000010482045,8.53149e-7,0.0000022793902,0.000008221467,0.0000056777726,0.000491104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999736,0.00001815993,0.00006509426,0.0000028333125,5.166877e-7,0.0000020834432,0.000009318363,0.0000013905183,0.0001646669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943095,0.0001388745,0.00003891028,0.0001247285,0.00018209624,0.00008445381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98824745,0.0061823567,0.0033592395,0.0005648192,0.0009173662,0.0007288491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010325852,0.0003069519,0.00022233855,0.00068589515,0.00020714331,0.0014253618,0.00026150205,0.00037576674,0.0017607288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009673085,0.00026206762,0.00017037576,0.00020938499,0.00064029655,0.00069540145,0.0006541496,0.0006138158,0.00015747784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028230372,0.0005698536,0.9248174,0.000062744235,0.000055578403,0.0007761284,0.016784795,0.00027037162,0.027247269,0.00042768902,0.00017146344,0.028534453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033329702,0.00028293458,0.9941445,0.00001554918,0.000021387115,0.00032130658,0.0018759092,0.0004090175,0.0025682661,0.00014515416,0.00020232634,0.00001032542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008487558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007974603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008487558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040059543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005884026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01687628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982549819","doi":"10.1002/rrq.279","title":"Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students’ Responses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Linguistics; Mathematics education; Syntax; Socioeconomic status; Population","score_opus":0.08620654445574574,"score_gpt":0.4136968686712713,"score_spread":0.3274903242155256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982549819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988887,0.00004959369,0.00050331245,0.000018479057,0.0000020824996,0.000035710644,0.000077080425,0.0000073293636,0.0004178807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979461,0.000060581202,0.0014374744,0.00001812057,0.0000024191495,0.00008654559,0.00019662877,0.000012805308,0.00023941463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972222,0.0016793861,0.00022058414,0.00041941373,0.00033689028,0.000121473706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91930205,0.070788726,0.0051897233,0.001606807,0.0025221792,0.00059054274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033921315,0.00027386314,0.00047842675,0.0010695033,0.0007559367,0.0012216822,0.00045443632,0.00047665602,0.0012072725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036010776,0.0004296717,0.00018083678,0.0009856265,0.0008780378,0.0010959253,0.0010500891,0.00063307537,0.000193011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011671165,0.0015094915,0.57481533,0.00076033344,0.00014822281,0.00081591547,0.28182408,0.00044089742,0.050985496,0.00049183855,0.00086865184,0.086172536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004264301,0.00048918463,0.95498204,0.00009562075,0.0000805812,0.0004660248,0.031213129,0.0012887768,0.008335456,0.0002723535,0.0026829017,0.000051243984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009140245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004455887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006607292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006701522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017939508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983930248","doi":"10.1002/rrq.289","title":"Automaticity and Control: How Do Executive Functions and Reading Fluency Interact in Predicting Reading Comprehension?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Fluency; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Executive functions; Automaticity; Comprehension; Cognition; Verbal fluency test; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Neuropsychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.029389259795921028,"score_gpt":0.35451485013846395,"score_spread":0.3251255903425429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983930248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99937904,0.00007297484,0.0001530264,0.000027302796,0.0000014698662,0.0000020913535,0.000021498496,0.0000033576525,0.00033929446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997656,0.000020254576,0.0000846077,0.0000064901637,0.0000026800612,0.0000028421377,0.000027223092,0.0000014262872,0.000089006324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994143,0.00030774612,0.00002927227,0.00009237782,0.000082188315,0.00007404455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093634,0.006270024,0.0014882468,0.00033891984,0.0003643643,0.0006020876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001765214,0.00044608992,0.00035777705,0.0007347822,0.00021358085,0.0011686522,0.0002556859,0.00048734376,0.0015577044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008212516,0.00024939512,0.00031654435,0.000308321,0.00056832697,0.00064360065,0.0004017927,0.00062433816,0.00022332736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012278162,0.000092427465,0.9932452,0.000007049945,0.00006846416,0.00007313413,0.00020490975,0.00012179581,0.00076354324,0.00007782074,0.000025125382,0.0051977164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064434234,0.000103914754,0.99841845,0.0000058524647,0.000029165898,0.00008122225,0.000110006615,0.00073362474,0.00023503849,0.00023435558,0.000037830614,0.0000041062603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019445617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031163737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019445617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017418721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031791223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009335518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013212602","doi":"10.1002/rrq.306","title":"The Capaciousness of No: Affective Refusals as Literacy Practices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre of Excellence for Coherent X-Ray Science, Australian Research Council; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Literacy; Feeling; Silence; Psychology; Normative; Gesture; Humanism; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.12682697600094436,"score_gpt":0.48586000842052157,"score_spread":0.3590330324195772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013212602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782153,0.0014171599,0.011746288,0.016852796,0.00040761536,0.00006955191,0.000022918428,0.000071481874,0.18725924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972063,0.00011217354,0.00036161215,0.00053030835,0.000025305097,0.000013728941,0.000003376849,0.00001108143,0.00173623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867421,0.010751638,0.00022570338,0.00042058167,0.0012910999,0.0005689468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131746,0.012918889,0.0022997737,0.0012305195,0.001285758,0.00094758393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061072446,0.00033200995,0.0003852105,0.00084147806,0.004722626,0.0062452913,0.0008291356,0.0026473415,0.001557003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021639023,0.00027294716,0.00031117364,0.00044984987,0.035110746,0.004984388,0.005869135,0.004247506,0.00019816832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006112282,0.000058494305,0.0031489553,0.00014288044,0.000011449828,0.0007057924,0.8454432,0.00015902509,0.0026713575,0.1374071,0.0013847663,0.008805939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026159782,0.00023546297,0.010318479,0.00045178004,0.000031011074,0.0014980767,0.7808343,0.0008205019,0.0024975983,0.10182801,0.10133079,0.00012779345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011459657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014063838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062452913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021433514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084132294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032298565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015724012","doi":"10.1002/rrq.312","title":"Pluriversal Literacies: Affect and Relationality in Vulnerable Times","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Literacy; Critical literacy; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.08210068595881978,"score_gpt":0.4374578562524066,"score_spread":0.3553571702935868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015724012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53333783,0.003061054,0.0048689963,0.042038612,0.00027469257,0.000054911645,0.000041504547,0.00007836223,0.4162439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.00031390632,0.00017532657,0.0005965309,0.000033158038,0.000014064669,0.000004405545,0.000010013228,0.0023779215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932405,0.0047629112,0.00014344786,0.00044597263,0.00051439955,0.0008928504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498993,0.0025728128,0.0008446716,0.00038373846,0.0002929529,0.0009159167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057732025,0.00038305527,0.00042725273,0.002210224,0.015209275,0.016163478,0.0010111738,0.0030499585,0.0055179913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074305,0.0002632235,0.0003752393,0.0010937955,0.05151183,0.011192814,0.019627172,0.004236513,0.00036611932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019864185,0.000048486516,0.0036918554,0.000047535734,0.000012012132,0.0007847665,0.5981488,0.00012121878,0.00032053207,0.38684684,0.0014383579,0.008519762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069560638,0.00006060429,0.0053016385,0.00031302555,0.00001667373,0.000960477,0.7138651,0.00038144522,0.00037173802,0.19073802,0.08793639,0.000047985162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030130106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021570995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016163478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044977586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017929563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032633603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087164176","doi":"10.1002/rrq.344","title":"When Did You Learn It? How Background Knowledge Impacts Attention and Comprehension in Read‐Aloud Activities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Knowledge level; Think aloud protocol; Mathematics education; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12676432519471462,"score_gpt":0.4036361440174629,"score_spread":0.27687181882274825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087164176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985122,0.00006294522,0.00015388078,0.00005000191,0.0000034476614,0.000011388013,0.000010692409,0.000009107205,0.001186264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990213,0.0000737583,0.00021342612,0.000031476695,0.000003764794,0.000019240326,0.000023772001,0.00001093155,0.00060222775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777323,0.0010391815,0.000104718,0.00035225478,0.0004900544,0.00024058176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97243947,0.02055942,0.003425274,0.0005837541,0.0012644074,0.0017277194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020433704,0.00028393345,0.00041114909,0.00047635988,0.00048581016,0.002358499,0.00047743408,0.0007319765,0.0039670756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04197581,0.00029539218,0.0002580197,0.00027696873,0.0006887807,0.0015476246,0.0009986944,0.0009941942,0.0006204492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005107103,0.00881532,0.6382114,0.00077204464,0.0003951485,0.0017455367,0.14363326,0.0011598923,0.07556401,0.0011416285,0.0017093165,0.12174532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009027743,0.0023541632,0.9611223,0.00020025353,0.00018806732,0.0003135707,0.025360756,0.0013619006,0.006116044,0.001198392,0.0016363488,0.00005789521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028440307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025151118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039670756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059602107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048088725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013271213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110540817","doi":"10.1002/rrq.362","title":"Determinants of Word‐Reading Development in English Learner University Students: A Longitudinal Eye Movement Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vocabulary; Vocabulary development; Phonological awareness; Word recognition; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Eye movement; Linguistics; Word processing; Cognition; Literacy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07081546507337637,"score_gpt":0.3959614170325909,"score_spread":0.32514595195921453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110540817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997689,0.000024714196,0.000018288269,0.000009139998,7.024839e-7,0.0000033882334,0.000044048993,0.0000020953782,0.00012873253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961936,0.000021125188,0.00003198188,0.0000065089494,8.2978335e-7,0.000005796151,0.00007025852,9.996477e-7,0.00024304011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997774,0.00003586537,0.000014757096,0.000051758507,0.000058309146,0.00006197618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.0002561288,0.0003870465,0.00007237202,0.00035618446,0.0002694083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005207877,0.00019072532,0.00025494443,0.0007361938,0.00041435543,0.0005628475,0.00025539647,0.00046177264,0.00130594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023908166,0.00016263603,0.0002300566,0.000451566,0.00020194046,0.0004103479,0.00036637418,0.0004765695,0.00041621565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001260774,0.00041349715,0.9887903,0.000008725546,0.000020531932,0.00013399935,0.0014898992,0.000026454367,0.002773666,0.000021625405,0.000093103736,0.0061020856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017071923,0.00012909579,0.9988784,0.0000022998431,0.0000042052056,0.000057460667,0.00055565016,0.000055915247,0.00021740013,0.000008980641,0.00008628139,0.0000026469443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011938927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016332818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011938927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026863007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003084504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023738861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154245982","doi":"10.1002/rrq.400","title":"How Chinese–English Bilingual Fourth Graders Draw on Syntactic Awareness in Reading Comprehension: Within‐ and Cross‐Language Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Syntax; Reading (process); Comprehension; Sentence; Psychology; Language transfer; Metalinguistic awareness; Comprehension approach; Computer science; Language education","score_opus":0.03512616220468784,"score_gpt":0.39831617413341547,"score_spread":0.36319001192872763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154245982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971384,0.000012650352,0.000016967202,0.0000032907515,5.387231e-7,0.0000019364913,0.000008893091,0.0000017832787,0.00023999339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995685,0.000014647394,0.000033056516,0.0000037918624,6.4306096e-7,0.000004504116,0.000024133493,0.000002213808,0.0003485527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967134,0.000070172166,0.000034002365,0.00008866246,0.00007262878,0.00006325608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996874,0.0015625661,0.0005582942,0.0002249798,0.00039273637,0.00038735874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057885976,0.00045895882,0.0003064525,0.0006421696,0.00025035307,0.0008579796,0.00018080557,0.00024665415,0.0025769742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028062086,0.00026946067,0.0002217111,0.00024394724,0.00055164937,0.00043406573,0.0005779182,0.00040753523,0.00028597208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087215356,0.00063918816,0.88033175,0.000102535676,0.00016665008,0.0006389526,0.018368224,0.00019222673,0.07834476,0.00017884995,0.00019476381,0.019970026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007822041,0.00023642278,0.99375486,0.0000066401894,0.000033234683,0.000093859344,0.0019535483,0.00021744901,0.003537303,0.000038322814,0.000112618116,0.000007780971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009389117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015448468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009389117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029140202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030342667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01866889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154768473","doi":"10.1002/rrq.397","title":"Informing the Science of Reading: Students’ Awareness of Sentence‐Level Information Is Important for Reading Comprehension","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Sentence; Comprehension; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Reading motivation; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12106546290694364,"score_gpt":0.44550638821210753,"score_spread":0.3244409253051639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154768473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93246305,0.0069309496,0.010068712,0.011146377,0.00023613064,0.0000394275,0.00011779895,0.000111794216,0.038885836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384046,0.0023603223,0.0020413809,0.000456476,0.000059219517,0.000015337093,0.00004658302,0.000012315569,0.0011677752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999134,0.00045953953,0.000063855645,0.000119732205,0.00015673345,0.00006620342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868211,0.009848917,0.0015609056,0.00030496894,0.0009665696,0.0004975185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001998423,0.00018629343,0.0002607974,0.00040266252,0.0003004487,0.0023658066,0.00024535522,0.0007681187,0.0045330236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012933767,0.00014877747,0.00014622367,0.0003323542,0.0013112874,0.001916221,0.0008746885,0.0015472163,0.0006550024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006087913,0.0014722729,0.19072378,0.004742043,0.0001324433,0.0012896861,0.06902844,0.0012205036,0.07940148,0.0531425,0.015522721,0.58271533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008856331,0.00205613,0.6257888,0.0037733715,0.0004270466,0.0013837266,0.03553068,0.0048696287,0.050377633,0.18573484,0.08981188,0.00015765578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006099083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012183923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045330236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031108825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011859789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0151644945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158386961","doi":"10.1002/rrq.406","title":"What Matters Most? Toward a Robust and Socially Just Science of Reading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Reading motivation; Literacy; Focus (optics); Nature versus nurture; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09650224216147076,"score_gpt":0.4100861520123437,"score_spread":0.313583909850873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158386961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019952668,0.024539515,0.04639443,0.84612,0.0047322684,0.00007189793,0.00017130112,0.00031089893,0.05770701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80754465,0.026557691,0.050599985,0.09267263,0.009707174,0.00036001368,0.0003094247,0.0005900731,0.0116584385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736649,0.018535107,0.0007613651,0.0034554307,0.00288013,0.00070298417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9202082,0.063342705,0.003844095,0.00444128,0.00580275,0.0023608818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03364019,0.000875167,0.0013696424,0.005231595,0.0052048946,0.018303514,0.0021496324,0.005666468,0.0032744375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04976246,0.00045419208,0.00050791993,0.0025394897,0.0707718,0.02380753,0.007030782,0.012581334,0.0017114899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046059005,0.00008040581,0.0032073774,0.00048042342,0.00005026655,0.00013857627,0.033082906,0.0003853302,0.0005373231,0.8852658,0.030981045,0.04574454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010789585,0.00003245244,0.0013463241,0.00056889444,0.000019885058,0.000104532126,0.011015773,0.00049719424,0.000392619,0.90130824,0.08467156,0.000031813586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034116893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033258214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03364019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057488536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008702812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256252648","doi":"10.1598/rrq.41.2.6","title":"INTERNATIONAL REPORTS ON LITERACY RESEARCH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Classical Studies and Philology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Citation; Information literacy; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14600672942269685,"score_gpt":0.4210851960362858,"score_spread":0.2750784666135889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256252648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00213509,0.08119256,0.0015094369,0.050738286,0.03157151,0.00039482897,0.007358158,0.00045772298,0.8246424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026187463,0.12765434,0.004415419,0.012820885,0.015045281,0.0009874208,0.013102664,0.0006640407,0.7991225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925351,0.0018788547,0.00083606044,0.0007997372,0.0029015844,0.0010487052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112535,0.005253002,0.0011508005,0.0019014222,0.0073559587,0.0032135223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007098999,0.0011409356,0.0009347955,0.011283913,0.0029293268,0.009722924,0.0017355344,0.00284088,0.18288353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021593457,0.0004877623,0.00077492674,0.016309591,0.0026315588,0.005558229,0.007375144,0.0034749813,0.06346178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005250896,0.00006932121,0.0012507467,0.00088690716,0.000011174516,0.00011397788,0.00095519883,0.000036786598,0.00026462242,0.04615165,0.7673805,0.18282656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024668473,0.000009559881,0.00126658,0.00051756477,0.0000024174321,0.00005553814,0.0003324607,0.000008028736,0.000059444104,0.00082170987,0.9969201,0.000004254135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011108118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121848015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18288353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060801553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018143196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6118064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309651990","doi":"10.1002/rrq.489","title":"Print Learning: A Theoretical Framework for the Role of Children's Learning about the Orthography in the Development of Reading Skill","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Orthography; Reading (process); Conceptualization; Learning to read; Psychology; Linguistics; Phonics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.025062585720838994,"score_gpt":0.3681515265539288,"score_spread":0.34308894083308983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309651990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08364746,0.071905166,0.33398506,0.050836265,0.00074804184,0.00018831666,0.00042923502,0.00029864,0.4579619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9215176,0.01593118,0.049445212,0.0019329748,0.00048631532,0.00037664102,0.0001665738,0.00006288232,0.010080556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988531,0.0006153006,0.000049101043,0.00024248724,0.00015257816,0.00008758852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687517,0.0021736522,0.00031119338,0.00016405497,0.0002811484,0.00019475639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030027453,0.0007621592,0.00045189308,0.0038252994,0.001080359,0.0042333077,0.0018662616,0.0016890351,0.0038252904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021529736,0.00030437292,0.000568793,0.001712397,0.020317432,0.0056541474,0.0020542813,0.0031892692,0.0006954528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006775349,0.000029244746,0.00045277269,0.00009282622,0.0000048223765,0.00010996653,0.0020951305,0.0004459457,0.00014243885,0.99076664,0.00043587925,0.0054176077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015318978,0.000038830614,0.0012448992,0.00023897072,0.00001718005,0.00019083684,0.0018266612,0.0028808499,0.0002444437,0.9771388,0.016148416,0.000014934347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030799797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024348185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042333077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033320454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002027917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024175823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318022899","doi":"10.1002/rrq.493","title":"Using Dynamic Assessment to Measure Morpheme Identification and Predict Character Reading Among Chinese Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Educational and Psychological Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Psychology; Reading (process); Vocabulary; Character (mathematics); Task (project management); Word recognition; Phonological awareness; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Chinese characters; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10756115559169273,"score_gpt":0.49198625808038915,"score_spread":0.38442510248869644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318022899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994424,0.000027489275,0.00012321895,0.000005706439,0.0000010708684,0.0000065135773,0.000053241194,0.000004628347,0.00033573515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924856,0.00003500914,0.0003289785,0.0000044806566,9.4409813e-7,0.000012153326,0.00010699146,0.0000015625023,0.0002612226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975866,0.000036641683,0.000033676537,0.000067641435,0.00007099781,0.00003235085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990363,0.0001853332,0.00039611437,0.00006577068,0.0001879599,0.00012855604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000535213,0.0005496974,0.00015273673,0.0009958067,0.0001884931,0.0004606237,0.00022860561,0.0002821196,0.0008232147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019342729,0.00018196277,0.00025867563,0.00040575088,0.0002473345,0.00046796282,0.00038666083,0.00032548764,0.0001497367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034818877,0.00007204648,0.98912233,0.000013438961,0.000010574649,0.00015098833,0.00047472157,0.000103772065,0.004335642,0.000031606764,0.000041732073,0.005608348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016743838,0.000092741684,0.9977564,0.0000045922566,0.0000086173,0.00014392415,0.00024575216,0.0003128734,0.0012908705,0.000027152557,0.00011142925,0.0000040596774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008137827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01236492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008137827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002810254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042012925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016180933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350153","doi":"10.1002/rrq.495","title":"Morphology and Reading Skills in Arabic‐Speaking Syrian Refugee Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phonological awareness; Semitic languages; Psychology; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Nonverbal communication; Context (archaeology); Vocabulary; Population; Refugee; Comprehension; Literacy; Word recognition; Learning to read; Vocabulary development; Cognition; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Arabic; Pedagogy; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03522140423601566,"score_gpt":0.3878015591099312,"score_spread":0.35258015487391553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999676,0.00005415926,0.0000047115514,0.000010295805,9.171222e-7,0.0000012255094,0.000034079952,0.0000013582073,0.00021708335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995147,0.000115480354,0.000042313066,0.0000071675245,8.8426077e-7,0.000003999362,0.00006516072,0.0000011212503,0.00024929104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983025,0.000024711044,0.000020433416,0.000028976725,0.00004621406,0.00004944017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991037,0.00016092519,0.00041641586,0.00004704359,0.00015632506,0.000115519535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041319316,0.00046878099,0.00032867448,0.0010370985,0.0005243114,0.0009166936,0.00019550834,0.00028683193,0.0024055303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020688255,0.00024558292,0.00025802266,0.0006215154,0.00080808473,0.0005056001,0.0005340921,0.00045097672,0.0003696823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011489307,0.00010540426,0.97473913,0.000050156024,0.00001709664,0.001325918,0.010423098,0.00006455042,0.0050055925,0.00008443026,0.00018136133,0.007888305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018739833,0.00009788085,0.9956175,0.000009601929,0.0000054016937,0.00056677224,0.0031771415,0.000028112929,0.00028514865,0.000017064984,0.00018980273,0.000003682641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021627957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03173945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021627957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040755115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006528106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043004155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380682783","doi":"10.1002/rrq.511","title":"Is a <scp>Phone‐Based</scp> Language and Literacy Assessment a Reliable and Valid Measure of Children's Reading Skills in <scp>Low‐Resource</scp> Settings?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jacobs Foundation","keywords":"Pseudoword; Phone; Vocabulary; Literacy; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Phonemic awareness; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Applied psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021775862292391663,"score_gpt":0.35977684008842187,"score_spread":0.3380009777960302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380682783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897794,0.00030086157,0.0020875111,0.00039871427,0.000040007402,0.00031991964,0.0010902191,0.00008996327,0.0058934186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122053,0.00024260004,0.005732357,0.00017165931,0.00002795716,0.0006806382,0.0008976729,0.000025215697,0.0010014799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549085,0.0020095173,0.00054927636,0.00046324448,0.0011548195,0.00033233914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97542393,0.0068069454,0.0050457967,0.0012271486,0.009770936,0.0017251703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054653417,0.00040066952,0.0005982324,0.0019891595,0.0006974051,0.001647652,0.000911695,0.0009165325,0.003814275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02670041,0.00030665298,0.0003803152,0.0019276087,0.0007317296,0.0010546453,0.00088131975,0.00060944026,0.0016145526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009327857,0.00026282505,0.9585742,0.0002489676,0.000075271775,0.00014552832,0.0011015998,0.00016881146,0.0013982408,0.000082647246,0.0020599463,0.035788726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023226145,0.00041387355,0.9957812,0.00016864257,0.00002787552,0.00014683155,0.0011677252,0.00052359625,0.000579835,0.000054157073,0.0010997753,0.000013245853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025873465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044938143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025873465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010706359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002230543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051445723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382698962","doi":"10.1002/rrq.514","title":"The Role of Executive Functions in Lexical Processing During Reading Comprehension","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Hong Kong Institute of Education","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Linguistics","score_opus":0.04910099844491945,"score_gpt":0.3919039135500191,"score_spread":0.34280291510509964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382698962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.0000745376,0.000114551396,0.000014591465,0.0000013752815,0.0000035064327,0.00005413379,0.0000038043022,0.0008581971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995627,0.00003719693,0.00007499797,0.000005338027,0.0000017612249,0.0000024929375,0.00003370293,0.000001281349,0.00028043796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989665,0.000035384943,0.000010015823,0.000021096252,0.000015996098,0.000020909556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981664,0.00086000626,0.0005198936,0.00009415552,0.00020294503,0.00015656585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046370883,0.00029437954,0.00016285687,0.00033150864,0.00011970252,0.000656753,0.00010845431,0.00012003856,0.0021018602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023669547,0.000116674775,0.000069403075,0.00023782726,0.0002841379,0.00029694632,0.0001710782,0.00024389655,0.00020035704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044698443,0.00028635937,0.9307685,0.000109966226,0.00008883681,0.0007888777,0.0020185218,0.0005173623,0.029757826,0.00026952664,0.00018313772,0.03476404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004105417,0.00007064559,0.9985475,0.0000068567683,0.000008621378,0.00007109973,0.00020828786,0.00028071532,0.0006185542,0.00011270738,0.00006825553,0.0000027409935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040880563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004807918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040880563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015301633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027631063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008128524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385837972","doi":"10.1002/rrq.519","title":"Do Teacher Reports of Executive Functions Predict Reading Development? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; York University; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Psychology; Executive functions; Reading (process); Literacy; Working memory; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11709167872033495,"score_gpt":0.4305286049256269,"score_spread":0.31343692620529195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385837972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795485,0.00027280315,0.00019511704,0.00010449024,0.000012228309,0.0000124172175,0.0007043086,0.000006863307,0.000736867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985073,0.00019740938,0.00019005724,0.0000713675,0.000009778528,0.00003305006,0.0007188274,0.000006135497,0.00026608582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781954,0.0007238482,0.0002880957,0.0005635731,0.0004342468,0.0001706974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98807436,0.002856072,0.005088999,0.0013023624,0.002137635,0.00054061174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002716919,0.00024055637,0.00052070507,0.00092839944,0.00044467594,0.0007979715,0.00053042633,0.00050039525,0.0012541943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136056105,0.00046557304,0.000461079,0.0012720083,0.00041076614,0.0007089201,0.0006505402,0.0007209517,0.00045617693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012897781,0.00002895419,0.99785954,0.000012475532,0.000041367708,0.000014921661,0.0003312838,0.000015271264,0.000055336164,0.000015793064,0.00016608965,0.0014461819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013897268,0.000027136126,0.99917173,0.000013199388,0.000014320137,0.000026197122,0.0004162655,0.00003798943,0.000043542055,0.0000107937185,0.00023559791,0.0000019145975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015653595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024981862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015653595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004534381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031125009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389340235","doi":"10.1002/rrq.525","title":"“Back Then it was Only Men Who Worked in These Kinds of Fields”: Observing Little Sparks Through the Prism of Affect and Gender in Maker Literacies Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Queer; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Queer theory; Pedagogy; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.19997920287353085,"score_gpt":0.4394811029312312,"score_spread":0.23950190005770036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389340235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441067,0.0010634566,0.005124029,0.009407515,0.00017029933,0.000060603794,0.00006680393,0.00006565281,0.039934874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943956,0.0002793781,0.0008450793,0.000703948,0.000022774128,0.000029938712,0.000012699378,0.000031532018,0.0036790424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910686,0.0069424645,0.00010338123,0.0005319531,0.0005723234,0.0007812813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919613,0.0052164616,0.00061652064,0.0004899078,0.0006376916,0.0010780146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012129828,0.0004997813,0.00052646606,0.001806883,0.018266547,0.0105237765,0.0018637665,0.0016229756,0.0035367783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013262464,0.0006555795,0.0002633237,0.0011222408,0.031232627,0.006380858,0.0074348804,0.0032790238,0.00042982853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014297157,0.000010481953,0.0019900836,0.000016134549,0.0000020805762,0.00014201821,0.9900733,0.00001105952,0.00029044723,0.003747081,0.0004481477,0.0032548856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024560045,0.000022343109,0.0021264367,0.000064301006,0.0000047335534,0.00010117734,0.97851276,0.000041225903,0.00033852583,0.0017284824,0.017045565,0.000011999412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041706678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080083445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98173344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071765487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049970923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08292782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392788228","doi":"10.1002/rrq.528","title":"Reifying, Disorienting and Restoring Gender Binaries in Dialogic Literature Discussions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Azrieli Foundation; Israel Science Foundation; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Dialogic; Silence; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Literacy; Gender studies; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12168932809885237,"score_gpt":0.46481821048677696,"score_spread":0.3431288823879246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392788228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340408,0.0008063902,0.024706816,0.0042498745,0.00016073433,0.00017715851,0.000030568455,0.00016190819,0.035665806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523133,0.00014331711,0.0024704374,0.0001715628,0.00002656678,0.00006456901,0.000011711214,0.000027155846,0.0018532671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801983,0.016473554,0.0003478264,0.0008529939,0.0011646086,0.0009626315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774047,0.017480927,0.0016912107,0.0011997169,0.0010003955,0.001223055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014053375,0.0007596644,0.0005373166,0.0030278047,0.011838859,0.00951478,0.0021935543,0.0022707097,0.0026881606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019466648,0.00051410566,0.0003912079,0.0011376755,0.022973388,0.008642969,0.01155186,0.0032485565,0.00035475867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032581192,0.000047678528,0.0013800049,0.00007717983,0.0000049645455,0.00052369887,0.96289045,0.00009840489,0.0022478194,0.021842482,0.00038746124,0.0104672285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015577334,0.000077368306,0.001467608,0.0002482207,0.000012209277,0.0004237083,0.94812095,0.000694009,0.0027990337,0.010544104,0.035573557,0.000023640621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022987155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034612927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014053375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046454165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038445573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396901753","doi":"10.1002/rrq.538","title":"Contributions of Reading Support from Teachers, Parents, and Friends to Reading Related Variables in Academic and Recreational Contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Recreation; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Biology","score_opus":0.07383486017229697,"score_gpt":0.44881974630550664,"score_spread":0.3749848861332097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396901753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968266,0.00005463622,0.00002293606,0.000020879537,0.0000025528295,0.0000035223838,0.000024805398,9.827497e-7,0.00018709918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983716,0.000032723652,0.000032552645,0.0000044190833,0.0000017605263,0.0000037050584,0.000023286346,5.337679e-7,0.00006385338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988274,0.0006226961,0.000076649085,0.00013798861,0.00017655763,0.00015860247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245596,0.00305582,0.0024085348,0.00040101228,0.0005614176,0.0011172659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012498606,0.00030997596,0.0003605825,0.0008023339,0.00089040824,0.001017218,0.00047551922,0.00042627938,0.001603109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009007259,0.0002957247,0.00036283594,0.00065906794,0.0005250223,0.00044069614,0.0012006686,0.0008688523,0.00013403616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053060492,0.00014159371,0.9940859,0.000013678375,0.00005145537,0.00010364663,0.0018679057,0.000045644963,0.00015499593,0.000025784853,0.00005961264,0.0033967057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025812801,0.00008227348,0.9950111,0.000011229768,0.000023877756,0.00007153506,0.004438529,0.00014673157,0.00008144418,0.000026287433,0.00010095914,0.0000034237294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062358314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011510173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062358314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031183116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053873245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012399077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399295798","doi":"10.1002/rrq.553","title":"Is There a Genetic Confound in the Relation of Home Literacy Environment with Children's Reading Skills? A Familial Control Method Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Literacy; Family literacy; Psychology; Relation (database); Developmental psychology; Emergent literacy; Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023763604949736967,"score_gpt":0.35066006025208935,"score_spread":0.3268964553023524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399295798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839144,0.00046764768,0.012847698,0.00021289934,0.000055461627,0.00013304094,0.00043388573,0.00004932492,0.00188567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938585,0.000091666065,0.0045655635,0.00006995015,0.000018389195,0.0002895871,0.00015638002,0.00001074553,0.00093928375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989935,0.0059711384,0.00038865945,0.0024167513,0.0007771339,0.00051149185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929778,0.003499806,0.0012931018,0.001644207,0.00033282748,0.0002522488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064285533,0.0011001889,0.00077604817,0.001420627,0.0025800646,0.0009432376,0.0012009781,0.0007877834,0.003243044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012130604,0.00040046254,0.0010475448,0.001647613,0.0017414661,0.000531703,0.001034313,0.0006585609,0.00015739648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076768355,0.0002873421,0.97680855,0.00006585369,0.001124411,0.00094002194,0.0028531132,0.00044728114,0.00208887,0.0033492465,0.00031326863,0.010954299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012137606,0.0009862842,0.9852395,0.00007431602,0.0013547455,0.00081622635,0.0016205669,0.004418559,0.0019464673,0.0014622248,0.0019285202,0.000031182564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03667572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027975688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03667572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097423774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012661495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072924495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401625826","doi":"10.1002/rrq.571","title":"White Christian Nationalism, Biblical Proof Texting, and Literacy Curriculum and Instruction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Sociology; Literacy; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Politics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.03352049176938976,"score_gpt":0.42786780910855915,"score_spread":0.3943473173391694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401625826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6418225,0.0008017338,0.0016313761,0.011081805,0.00007687457,0.00002358621,0.000017501176,0.00002763731,0.3445169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513996,0.00012837833,0.0002858819,0.00021283631,0.000013361696,0.000010310497,0.000005224796,0.000007451472,0.004196491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766123,0.0016103168,0.000067210654,0.00016189282,0.0002552264,0.00024413984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938426,0.003769221,0.0011438403,0.00036388764,0.0004084182,0.00047204425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027506524,0.0001554597,0.00017213868,0.0008850372,0.0071569346,0.004621356,0.00052026106,0.00094200094,0.004428296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00754246,0.00009595406,0.000083479084,0.0009727154,0.02314271,0.0027334508,0.0034147059,0.0019063969,0.00020539314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002591568,0.00016499021,0.007780921,0.0000830828,0.0000051375064,0.0003079071,0.3973143,0.00017777485,0.0005684007,0.5611466,0.003099154,0.029325763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032371492,0.00013695801,0.040055957,0.00081059855,0.000022287486,0.00035453163,0.48804188,0.0011446429,0.0030473452,0.1555654,0.31072915,0.00005889822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011797712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027044332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011797712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005330572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004164292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038676202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404326145","doi":"10.1002/rrq.585","title":"“They're Like Slash”: Multimodality and Embodied Agency in Students' Critical Engagements with Texts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Slash (logging); Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Critical reading; Sociology; Pedagogy; Reading (process); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08566863975611476,"score_gpt":0.41020036177375974,"score_spread":0.32453172201764496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404326145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526991,0.00033928166,0.008013583,0.002010194,0.000029855804,0.000035646095,0.00001691289,0.000063456406,0.03679201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997919,0.00007085846,0.0005721427,0.00006976077,0.0000033058966,0.000015265332,0.000003623228,0.00001726249,0.0013287998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677557,0.0021835382,0.000076442186,0.00027219532,0.0003719855,0.0003202202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500054,0.0034399086,0.00058042066,0.00029565833,0.00024097398,0.0004424145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003187816,0.00042070274,0.00038415857,0.0012454102,0.003715531,0.009045356,0.0007501366,0.0013644133,0.0049666734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008574838,0.00035857217,0.0003439039,0.000574572,0.015528704,0.0050182277,0.0071612736,0.002587076,0.00040879028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023620934,0.000037190974,0.0040935953,0.00005844359,0.000007519159,0.0003932412,0.9733715,0.00007405153,0.0023103012,0.012325384,0.0003051663,0.006999994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009763739,0.00006883647,0.005690676,0.00019810737,0.000021953001,0.00069519086,0.94905156,0.00052925857,0.0020771814,0.013975327,0.027648143,0.000034064567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001689836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024270734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009045356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011519059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001392445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016858995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405204758","doi":"10.1002/rrq.597","title":"Critically Engaged Language and Literacy Workshops as a Disruptive Pedagogy in Plurilingual Classrooms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Literacy; Pedagogy; Psychology; Teaching method; Phonemic awareness; Sociology","score_opus":0.08745869982686293,"score_gpt":0.579388888933002,"score_spread":0.49193018910613906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405204758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9290648,0.00037653072,0.015665406,0.0023548582,0.00014823067,0.00042190318,0.0000296168,0.00021211387,0.051726464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897383,0.0001641758,0.0042545013,0.00019275524,0.0000151244885,0.00018255426,0.000012321548,0.00003455822,0.005405712],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821497,0.009181702,0.00016100079,0.00057743484,0.0006076883,0.0012571723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907965,0.006915867,0.0006761684,0.0009648393,0.0006454435,0.0017180283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008809148,0.0006693221,0.00047481808,0.0012996923,0.010879747,0.0067591853,0.002938934,0.0015556507,0.004196714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01025524,0.00042555266,0.00035575728,0.0007183511,0.01339113,0.0039078197,0.015076139,0.0022383034,0.0005583756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079541634,0.0003514926,0.0030024326,0.00019718368,0.0000079566935,0.0011706458,0.9375337,0.00015650158,0.003346507,0.009786907,0.0012507321,0.043116387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028868504,0.00029559343,0.0032364218,0.00025976574,0.000013803141,0.00050566386,0.93882596,0.0003131315,0.0027457096,0.0042467415,0.049497455,0.000030945434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093762325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026510293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010879747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040127016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077725966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046587765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405653019","doi":"10.1002/rrq.601","title":"Writing in Creole Contexts: A Study of Jamaican Primary School Students","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Clarendon Fund; University of Oxford","keywords":"Creole language; Psychology; Primary education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12991156025072995,"score_gpt":0.5877195127283936,"score_spread":0.4578079524776637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405653019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984518,0.00007944439,0.00002744488,0.00010713764,0.0000040748573,0.000033981043,0.000018074545,0.0000016546344,0.0012764273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996801,0.00023305175,0.000103653154,0.00018818397,0.0000044760804,0.000046773366,0.00002818489,0.0000046814625,0.0025899233],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853325,0.0004642864,0.000107424676,0.00022344045,0.00030281697,0.0003688424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960317,0.001708241,0.00058570405,0.00016979218,0.0006707832,0.0008338039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020057533,0.0005975105,0.0010908844,0.0015245983,0.011155412,0.0064435033,0.0012128506,0.001464541,0.0040063127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005901018,0.0007604452,0.00023389574,0.0015985416,0.0032858818,0.0016315605,0.0026905995,0.0024129038,0.00086640153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030117168,0.0006280945,0.046622667,0.00010924773,0.000005777661,0.0021894267,0.94270724,0.000015340547,0.0012418008,0.00015513111,0.0002542718,0.006040879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005185407,0.00022860759,0.050258905,0.000079496844,0.0000070247265,0.00047549026,0.9454324,0.000046502777,0.0003057754,0.000067546636,0.0030812707,0.000011901945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040898927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13420354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040898927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021748128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004215498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409242827","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70007","title":"Getting at How: Testing Mediating Factors in the Relation Between Morphological Awareness and Reading Comprehension in Grade 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Comprehension; Relation (database); Reading (process); Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15003632649262558,"score_gpt":0.4205855967029053,"score_spread":0.27054927021027975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409242827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999079,0.000041196636,0.00008864289,0.000023746003,0.0000018698333,0.000007451254,0.000059204525,0.0000063928264,0.0006924513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986362,0.00006767305,0.00034712118,0.000010228772,0.000001334518,0.000020337957,0.00010619421,0.0000040989075,0.00080679805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994517,0.00012034572,0.000043751836,0.00014892039,0.000122787,0.000112509144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433655,0.002713359,0.0016155173,0.0003968555,0.0005885043,0.00034924617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304157,0.0007460976,0.000623181,0.00091008603,0.0006123935,0.0021296304,0.00061677344,0.0005694496,0.005308231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009298378,0.00043697667,0.00045084755,0.00036484163,0.0007818092,0.0010740202,0.0009986641,0.0012416875,0.0006685258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016436803,0.0007076724,0.94891727,0.00015201906,0.000072534436,0.0004716327,0.018945428,0.00022117377,0.00808946,0.00076401245,0.00038283505,0.021111555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057171446,0.00039085824,0.9880354,0.000054893513,0.00007791613,0.0001378756,0.0067855655,0.00025528405,0.0031941407,0.00039991963,0.000646074,0.000016359996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013721397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022646666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013721397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005458273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007811628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027283072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411006431","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70018","title":"“There's nothing to read here…the newspaper is <i>cho cá</i>, for the fish!”: A Young Refugee‐Background Child Brokering Languages, Literacies, and Cultures as a Caring Multiliterate Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Newspaper; Nothing; Refugee; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Media studies; Political science; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0666451196676964,"score_gpt":0.5293804867145967,"score_spread":0.4627353670469003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411006431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98197824,0.0012013285,0.00059709407,0.007059021,0.00022778194,0.000076454286,0.000078534045,0.00003916621,0.008742382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848514,0.0017654876,0.0013933568,0.0021090459,0.000042232514,0.00009815779,0.00005258474,0.000057843656,0.009629757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821943,0.0007144078,0.00008215749,0.00016418003,0.0002664994,0.0005532844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985696,0.00031544015,0.00020736095,0.00006759185,0.00017136711,0.0006685527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023583623,0.0007974276,0.0013209179,0.00096072856,0.017018527,0.0045818216,0.0015107774,0.0023562675,0.0040775086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028794047,0.0008030097,0.00060198683,0.0007260221,0.0074044825,0.0036116713,0.00751222,0.0053110365,0.00068534206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025323934,0.00009058927,0.005278214,0.00010925089,0.000007197278,0.018929072,0.96552527,0.000020888512,0.0012111847,0.002961576,0.0019828726,0.0038586159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023964406,0.000048752107,0.0015560157,0.000100326906,0.0000074639684,0.0077251927,0.9789711,0.0000376786,0.00026388315,0.00035472735,0.010913183,0.000019203044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023198571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06047656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023198571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003593804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004492859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04612708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414077636","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70126","title":"Refugee Displacement and Migration Impact Cross-Linguistic Transfer Between Arabic and English: Insights from Syrian Refugees","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Refugee; Displacement (psychology); Context (archaeology); Syrian refugees; Arabic; Reading (process); Forced migration; Literacy","score_opus":0.028342557014300954,"score_gpt":0.4380148088425704,"score_spread":0.40967225182826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414077636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995821,0.0000794326,0.0000064455035,0.00006706397,0.0000014594794,0.0000019204283,0.000019825431,2.4974392e-7,0.00024148129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945647,0.00020653514,0.000022779732,0.00004335972,0.0000018290795,0.0000062735617,0.000033033997,8.268977e-7,0.0002290426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964225,0.00011142309,0.000029033426,0.000037955742,0.000035253113,0.00014405405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992287,0.00024533816,0.00021087722,0.000040542636,0.000116585245,0.00015800573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563408,0.00032312394,0.0004386109,0.00083983515,0.0022046976,0.0014107354,0.0003321318,0.00040964517,0.0029026733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026216754,0.00021625622,0.000316471,0.0010695757,0.0015443013,0.0010079612,0.0022914982,0.0007103413,0.00026316004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011075023,0.00014901908,0.7466267,0.00011135147,0.000027961723,0.0014578643,0.23918825,0.00004021453,0.0007820058,0.00042476715,0.00039793545,0.010683188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036426643,0.000098485085,0.5413373,0.000107341584,0.000015220645,0.00032664844,0.4567821,0.000045951547,0.00011568699,0.0001163998,0.0010380262,0.000013227823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078749575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14722253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078749575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010727063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017776036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15658242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415187127","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70069","title":"The Linguistic Pathways Model: Capturing the Multiple Dimensions of Reading Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Comprehension; Sentence; Parsing; Construct (python library); Syntax","score_opus":0.06804229341920819,"score_gpt":0.37897391997708324,"score_spread":0.31093162655787504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415187127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3600688,0.002087538,0.5446419,0.008535241,0.00008203597,0.00027709236,0.0015296257,0.00086525746,0.081912555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121649,0.0007811208,0.08145923,0.000215555,0.000021970845,0.0003174944,0.0002966941,0.00007341181,0.004669586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929667,0.00039047885,0.000026731328,0.00013203677,0.0000855347,0.00006863219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967474,0.0019326641,0.0004164425,0.00028037338,0.0003324202,0.00029068103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016558731,0.0006955963,0.00033465007,0.0016631933,0.00039220587,0.002550967,0.0010546267,0.00095466984,0.0054582106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006392917,0.00051458663,0.00060610345,0.0008753568,0.0017520431,0.004669358,0.0018463974,0.0014104645,0.00087411114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021972749,0.0003493824,0.09493469,0.00042498228,0.00017394146,0.0012186007,0.006374233,0.07041466,0.005623578,0.698656,0.0032587973,0.11835145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004290206,0.00017385959,0.025278406,0.0001407421,0.000094929994,0.0005467629,0.0015268751,0.19092354,0.0009272392,0.7730234,0.0072687482,0.00005264853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006329126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069667315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006329126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014058355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002303517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018259525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415557608","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70041","title":"“Book Boundaries” in West Michigan School Board Election Campaigns: Examining White Christian Nationalist Visions of Dominion Over Literacy Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University","keywords":"Rhetoric; Censorship; Dominion; Literacy; White (mutation); Vision; Politics; Nationalism","score_opus":0.023646944610520918,"score_gpt":0.4263683736511291,"score_spread":0.4027214290406082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415557608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98346865,0.00011056653,0.0001068645,0.0010127642,0.000014218451,0.000021007038,0.00006177167,0.0000018918669,0.015202298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771047,0.000087376844,0.0000803041,0.00023553599,0.000011839761,0.00003812373,0.00004786678,0.0000053024105,0.0017831278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971826,0.0013158886,0.00012261084,0.00028523788,0.0005043054,0.00058951904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880251,0.0060010697,0.003493803,0.00039244775,0.0011506088,0.0009370294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041206935,0.00017455482,0.00019733868,0.0021721409,0.0067817946,0.0060790116,0.00065145944,0.00092798244,0.00460941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010013334,0.0002638776,0.00010858417,0.0022004095,0.0069475975,0.0026129496,0.003892217,0.0019554398,0.00022008974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045899662,0.00008177975,0.09440604,0.00006242663,0.000007981217,0.00034661673,0.8869916,0.000029329369,0.00055157684,0.007964297,0.0016359123,0.007876545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002268803,0.000023619337,0.12395229,0.00014361316,0.0000062877975,0.00004351235,0.8545704,0.0000697927,0.00028211187,0.00043332297,0.020460656,0.000012167658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088574596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26930583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088574596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006905506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036680955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17611808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}