{"meta":{"query_hash":"ebc4789d1623","filters":{"venue":"Reading Research Quarterly"},"cohort_total":59,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":59,"exported":59,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ebc4789d1623","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Reading+Research+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1536377901","doi":"10.1002/rrq.013","title":"Understanding the Relative Contributions of Lower‐Level Word Processes, Higher‐Level Processes, and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension Performance in Proficient Adult Readers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Structural equation modeling; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Word recognition; Short-term memory; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2023258657908841,"score_gpt":0.38993186293484083,"score_spread":0.18760599714395673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536377901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97720414,0.0010689248,0.00705424,0.0021081113,0.0007491482,0.001966956,0.000046523644,0.00010204664,0.009699897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957975,0.00005479098,0.0009103253,0.00007442109,0.00015967195,0.00031313722,0.00002160122,0.00004890574,0.0026196146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955576,0.00058171636,0.0007735148,0.00064686115,0.0009331733,0.0015071149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958718,0.0022675814,0.00023610708,0.0005050803,0.0007763182,0.00034312176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914456,0.00032594753,0.00045871825,0.0008533404,0.0007057992,0.00014266098,0.00043065136,0.00020881105,0.000040115512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007482297,0.00025406858,0.000046456316,0.002721234,0.00037294565,0.00055047375,0.00009856155,0.0010091725,0.000056754165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029192995,0.0016300929,0.15267599,0.0030137287,0.00050237606,0.00008098431,0.69741255,0.00007828024,0.005588757,0.0793311,0.0053321845,0.05143467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007650762,0.00503212,0.68014026,0.027387144,0.00018116736,0.00040411812,0.25100848,0.0008152129,0.0051920786,0.007031655,0.012093881,0.0030631605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002898081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062943735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085947127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031651568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546053610","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70","title":"Supporting Change in Literacy Instruction in Malawi","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; McGill University","keywords":"Coaching; Literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Intervention (counseling); Perception; Humanities; Art; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07172176611854,"score_gpt":0.45551904966948,"score_spread":0.38379728355094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546053610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97859466,0.0000647355,0.000058694877,0.000501387,0.00047191128,0.0003881362,0.0000017352572,0.000059019483,0.019859739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963347,0.000005305867,0.00041948498,0.00008009608,0.00032346908,0.00030543975,0.000020098789,0.000031997715,0.002479433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633765,0.00088434585,0.00060777494,0.00056905695,0.00045240132,0.0011487973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.00049971574,0.00009126728,0.00042384496,0.00010443556,0.00014903427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051104454,0.0001639375,0.00027059126,0.0014303391,0.00010227018,0.00016464038,0.00028504126,0.00015309852,0.0003704688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001883782,0.00016446649,0.000044216722,0.0010748942,0.00007095536,0.00045574363,0.000030136163,0.00079458725,0.0006663254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007510645,0.00011905457,0.249853,0.000047678855,0.000007716808,0.00012489539,0.078206815,5.208511e-7,0.0003553804,0.0069617378,0.00035465762,0.66389346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019884482,0.00080530683,0.9544621,0.000663208,0.0000020594284,0.00010744586,0.004025817,0.0014070616,0.000085765074,0.004994888,0.031071754,0.00038615806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029652053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020490361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027466877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003587267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8564487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677020752","doi":"10.1002/rrq.031","title":"Epistemological Tensions in Reading Research and a Vision for the Future","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Frame (networking); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Linguistics; Visual arts; Philosophy; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.20082151120271757,"score_gpt":0.5286859880498845,"score_spread":0.32786447684716696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677020752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7772394,0.0020156358,0.00031863706,0.19758624,0.0011581253,0.0022606787,0.000005213955,0.00010130672,0.019314747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938271,0.00025098413,0.0009973752,0.0001323829,0.0009373774,0.00019783014,0.0000025023157,0.000010401756,0.0036440338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961381,0.0012221714,0.00020584174,0.0002655871,0.001004868,0.0011634103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206537,0.006914014,0.000017672375,0.00021158879,0.0004586794,0.0003326764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02282095,0.000076668846,0.00013101328,0.0002831152,0.0023639759,0.00028633693,0.00031690163,0.00015615295,0.000053171396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020665908,0.000051342955,0.000031992466,0.0008344088,0.0008461616,0.00023902005,0.000053956184,0.00075988006,0.00006142715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046825626,0.00023178823,0.011619695,0.000036823785,0.00000868789,0.0000044050207,0.08806616,5.4853412e-8,0.0005505615,0.8129506,0.010715514,0.075768895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044395815,0.00082043745,0.084464125,0.00033064454,0.0000052489145,0.000010432829,0.27277008,0.00009415884,0.00004550825,0.22177449,0.41898647,0.00025444472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051046093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037702473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000296927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022509362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1728407011","doi":"10.1002/rrq.69","title":"The Role of Acculturation in Reading a Second Language: Its Relation to English Literacy Skills in Immigrant Chinese Adolescents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Acculturation; Reading comprehension; Humanities; Fluency; Psychology; Literacy; Reading (process); Immigration; Pedagogy; Art; Mathematics education; Geography; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009095328512972116,"score_gpt":0.35248297008452995,"score_spread":0.3433876415715578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1728407011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922109,0.00019278632,0.000026873908,0.000124063,0.0002738174,0.0006216209,0.000006074136,0.00003279892,0.0065110195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966283,0.000007351724,0.00011020489,0.000026375077,0.00017914567,0.00015012862,0.000025964498,0.000026168873,0.0028463542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661833,0.0010156522,0.0006897205,0.00046094414,0.0005235961,0.00069174665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798757,0.0009516762,0.00012846715,0.00046703313,0.00032841563,0.00013685168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041107833,0.00018275031,0.00027568155,0.0007491866,0.00015717055,0.00020195436,0.00038489295,0.00013758375,0.00005542531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011928669,0.00013446501,0.00005617176,0.0011964013,0.000040382667,0.00039481427,0.000036388123,0.0006408308,0.00017137112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030082715,0.00026680637,0.12773366,0.00007652866,0.000022438888,0.00001850072,0.6031567,0.000011708537,0.03870627,0.0021588444,0.00029457666,0.22725314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129735,0.00042130728,0.97334594,0.0011441284,0.000002637145,0.0000076454535,0.0146973375,0.0008065826,0.0014132576,0.0009173928,0.005862985,0.00025103026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000658733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022491369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003903657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5483324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934607586","doi":"10.1002/rrq.95","title":"Development of English and French Language and Literacy Skills in EL1 and EL French Immersion Students in the Early Grades","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"French immersion; Literacy; Psychology; Early literacy; Primary education; Mathematics education; Emergent literacy; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01848180156450484,"score_gpt":0.3796549059763709,"score_spread":0.36117310441186606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934607586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978933,0.0005517493,0.000016790462,0.00005789336,0.000095232965,0.00034884096,0.0000031672143,0.000010991366,0.0010220534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858725,0.000024977891,0.0007984672,0.000022403428,0.000052909127,0.000059585465,0.000009776294,0.00001397711,0.00043066152],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739414,0.0006570374,0.0004417522,0.00044103782,0.00056308304,0.0005029446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843603,0.0009895054,0.000068832254,0.0002832419,0.000115566465,0.00010683543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041712783,0.00016107857,0.00026615517,0.0005981623,0.00012521015,0.00021343566,0.00028328504,0.00010334791,0.000019284305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019430202,0.00012128223,0.00001615062,0.0003989402,0.00014226559,0.00019464985,0.00007240991,0.00045451382,0.000009000526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013660981,0.0001416113,0.39336753,0.00004733949,0.000016696458,0.00001363513,0.5028444,1.8982899e-8,0.00049601094,0.00021790157,0.000103099315,0.10273811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001012085,0.00028857277,0.98141426,0.00034510184,0.0000030183476,0.0000050340736,0.015146718,0.0000094872585,0.000079559315,0.00029644748,0.001263395,0.00013633199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012359809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5880467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049170005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028346796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49457458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962109311","doi":"10.1002/rrq.006","title":"Multilingual Practices, Critical Literacies, and Visual Culture: A Focus on African Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Visual literacy; Critical literacy; Multilingualism; Linguistics; Focus (optics); Power (physics); Diversity (politics); Relevance (law); Psychology; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Political science","score_opus":0.15040641614791095,"score_gpt":0.4209840058183819,"score_spread":0.27057758967047096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962109311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542804,0.000742216,0.000007144801,0.0009551288,0.0008261274,0.0003522958,0.000028872855,0.0001017166,0.04270609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993584,0.000027565664,0.00012270195,0.00009484854,0.001574675,0.00005923567,0.000016893398,0.000025817752,0.0044943113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977606,0.00037602178,0.0002754363,0.0004188662,0.0005455496,0.0006235201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767625,0.0011807791,0.00009856528,0.00021180509,0.00052393944,0.00030868634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122742,0.00017358386,0.00019577364,0.00028667864,0.0006584844,0.0008081482,0.00016692872,0.00007652951,0.0005789512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014598772,0.0001382344,0.000047986872,0.000091496906,0.0006380412,0.0008195097,0.000021481921,0.0005887432,0.00025358636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018350403,0.00038281694,0.000195808,0.00007607896,0.00002230284,0.000038460377,0.87092847,1.5665347e-9,0.00007475833,0.03748492,0.0029744094,0.0876385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010651296,0.009060958,0.0017980862,0.00058333506,0.00005528201,0.000059829254,0.788108,0.00021729179,0.0013667424,0.035358295,0.16163628,0.00069075875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019974003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046385193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15866187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007287713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013222883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77929914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975212230","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.2.3","title":"How Will Literacy Be Assessed in the Next Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Snippet; Mathematics education; Psychology; Phonics; Standardized test; Pedagogy; Computer science; Primary education","score_opus":0.09343138122749,"score_gpt":0.41493676861864465,"score_spread":0.32150538739115464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975212230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130035,0.00080642704,0.000034839988,0.01290808,0.0002675984,0.0005977492,0.000009538007,0.00008480445,0.07228744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459592,0.000103703474,0.0002690395,0.00046970477,0.00031112274,0.00028229418,0.00003409428,0.000039884137,0.052530948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508137,0.001613577,0.00040233476,0.0006689325,0.00096937834,0.0012644298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996989,0.0016278299,0.000052996944,0.0009893645,0.00016475124,0.00017607171],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036319315,0.00024871947,0.0002940018,0.00055423664,0.00033529196,0.0013672832,0.0009341652,0.000174186,0.00183494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104717124,0.0001780779,0.000104023704,0.0012229682,0.00017242796,0.00085011293,0.00001726869,0.0011092119,0.0008774177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019545194,0.0005104701,0.0036116173,0.00004594029,0.00006649257,0.000697144,0.16731824,7.595194e-7,0.00082594453,0.005685266,0.07700002,0.74404263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010914343,0.0008870852,0.04572348,0.00022252821,0.0000069595762,0.00016385278,0.01607378,0.00011618276,0.000038958235,0.001517487,0.9337857,0.00037256797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062962587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028288241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85678566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015581117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008709753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984129771","doi":"10.1598/rrq.46.2.5","title":"Issues in Second‐Language Reading: Implications for Acquisition and Instruction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Humanities; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07792822985849499,"score_gpt":0.4213477156598346,"score_spread":0.34341948580133963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984129771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800165,0.00024649722,0.00029089427,0.00040388046,0.00019599531,0.000560492,0.000022039929,0.00007191887,0.018191734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910112,0.000013875965,0.002032348,0.000033427532,0.00013671945,0.00046376043,0.00004021937,0.000027308028,0.006241125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983071,0.00021145125,0.00032221896,0.00046592983,0.00014328335,0.0005500243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904674,0.0002727627,0.000060318936,0.00035946397,0.0001329136,0.00012777717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014243578,0.00012876267,0.00018380028,0.0006537647,0.00020391961,0.00008977613,0.00016908422,0.00012937418,0.0003611711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050990762,0.00012850875,0.000036393834,0.00037938968,0.00010519083,0.0002514769,0.000016911554,0.00026327558,0.00009202591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037273363,0.00024352643,0.060573287,0.00014749097,0.000086127664,0.000026953237,0.37125742,6.259504e-8,0.016163368,0.108685486,0.0075742765,0.43486926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015643961,0.0011832155,0.9304919,0.00018606361,0.000009347023,0.00012006575,0.02459296,0.000034666267,0.0015621895,0.030870624,0.00903913,0.00034539134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068054564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007069106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86991864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012322277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003166336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5240435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984970179","doi":"10.1598/rrq.42.1.1","title":"Learning to read and write genre‐specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Degree (music); Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05365785034518521,"score_gpt":0.42353547721036394,"score_spread":0.3698776268651787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984970179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98776406,0.00025611644,0.00031344,0.0007355494,0.00005138518,0.00019296832,7.7395987e-7,0.000057001278,0.010628723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963025,0.000072405106,0.0008558023,0.000010620416,0.00027930998,0.000014283582,0.0000012801862,0.000013942977,0.0024498864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777174,0.00042958878,0.00025089548,0.00033598687,0.0006131123,0.00059868454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982857,0.0010477696,0.00006137775,0.00014964984,0.00017372177,0.00028174676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080205565,0.000088325614,0.00015273363,0.0003884278,0.0012595727,0.00027624873,0.00017449439,0.000077058256,0.000018544255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096855225,0.00009311122,0.000022354274,0.00034195784,0.0003830479,0.00022443262,0.00003281232,0.00042602254,0.000012370385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002119882,0.00003553178,0.013020647,0.000033328153,0.0000045472466,0.00000456245,0.5772471,3.2219913e-7,0.02302692,0.019602865,0.00010512176,0.3668979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018971333,0.00058309,0.03197164,0.00055520434,0.0000042771644,0.000007953031,0.949525,0.00004968224,0.0009025945,0.0012763106,0.014723629,0.00021088809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023464316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053259265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37227795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008557045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005448328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988939986","doi":"10.1598/rrq.44.2.2","title":"The Dimensionality of Phonological Abilities in Greek","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Rasch model; Phonological awareness; Orthography; Construct validity; Scale (ratio); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Literacy; Psychometrics; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.07381013224796533,"score_gpt":0.4177407468599912,"score_spread":0.34393061461202584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988939986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733322,0.0003539705,0.00001218657,0.002090691,0.00016656985,0.00021692575,0.0000025839486,0.000028984532,0.023795854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960837,0.000014174588,0.00011609383,0.000041208034,0.000047268382,0.0000358226,0.000003243479,0.000006043741,0.0036524541],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732894,0.0007840894,0.00043894863,0.00031556704,0.0004975549,0.00063487433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971965,0.002037095,0.000054422788,0.0004713688,0.00015685913,0.00008378843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040961737,0.000103588245,0.00020364154,0.00020314613,0.00019017946,0.00005345021,0.0003555384,0.000096081094,0.00013493079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026569888,0.000066609675,0.00005924799,0.00043167878,0.00032717083,0.00006835261,0.000017864902,0.00049085467,0.00015235916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007460052,0.00080138986,0.033916928,0.000030698175,0.00006446809,0.00030920154,0.063833565,0.0000022662375,0.004047534,0.23583998,0.0111031765,0.6493048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066842104,0.0019344584,0.85481256,0.00013584745,0.0000023603775,0.00006156883,0.009885944,0.000045608856,0.00021438146,0.11754389,0.014509196,0.00018573413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041894673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030708732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8208957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011055995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000639706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27162635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990289074","doi":"10.1598/rrq.45.3.4","title":"Naming Speed and Reading: From Prediction to Instruction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":341,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Phonological awareness; Humanities; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03915748973438768,"score_gpt":0.3759477141845761,"score_spread":0.33679022445018847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990289074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805438,0.00002203217,0.00022135684,0.0005006185,0.001829957,0.0003574631,0.000025217563,0.00016185902,0.016337685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99161524,0.0000036354459,0.0020731934,0.00004465438,0.00076084264,0.000052456657,0.000038830512,0.000038632916,0.005372536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974953,0.0002313871,0.00036089087,0.0006957908,0.00053799275,0.0006786528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841654,0.00042541462,0.00005791324,0.00051793014,0.0001855603,0.00039665774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016120996,0.00017868681,0.00021444059,0.0006593333,0.00038342053,0.00030301602,0.00023417162,0.0002079463,0.00039071255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019043659,0.00017493468,0.000037969672,0.00051088905,0.00012108516,0.00026569254,0.000040665054,0.00095317076,0.0007237784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027207844,0.00010091407,0.059039734,0.000025138457,0.000120731725,0.0000788371,0.06864091,6.401335e-7,0.21431367,0.008964295,0.0096624615,0.6387806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021030658,0.0017965902,0.850175,0.00036106133,0.000028373373,0.00029043117,0.0117191635,0.00060052634,0.0037237373,0.00784826,0.12066014,0.0006936215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017399763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006708933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7911353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010626298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046647394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9302948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006392742","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.4.6","title":"The Role of Knowledge in Early Literacy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; Princeton University; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Comprehension; Literacy; Reading comprehension; Adult literacy; Sociology; Odds; Psychology; Pedagogy; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03654070737238409,"score_gpt":0.4078192068284299,"score_spread":0.37127849945604585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006392742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86307,0.0018424835,0.000013351164,0.00017928134,0.00021708939,0.00023228784,0.0000018427969,0.00002932135,0.13441433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97929657,0.00005167912,0.00007232006,0.0000059170684,0.0001242529,0.00011156739,0.0000031747609,0.000023417668,0.020311112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997186,0.0007184521,0.0004845691,0.00034753422,0.00041087743,0.00085258076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973371,0.0016062582,0.00006840402,0.00059144973,0.0002672154,0.00012957268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031888122,0.00013124774,0.00020687847,0.00050315424,0.00022721154,0.00015099015,0.00053969066,0.000098022465,0.00013014635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009394017,0.00009616475,0.000066243265,0.0010338338,0.00018531721,0.0001686558,0.000034918765,0.000565459,0.0009483272],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020245434,0.00024832436,0.11745016,0.000012256943,0.000040920822,0.00006085082,0.1110162,1.885636e-7,0.0012483828,0.028309975,0.0014188562,0.7399914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009458614,0.0011298091,0.47619638,0.00034948235,0.0000042465995,0.000059204773,0.013190095,0.0001714237,0.00039067643,0.017138546,0.49014926,0.0002750214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011089004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007415995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7397164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011997508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008346369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007867453","doi":"10.1598/rrq.41.2.3","title":"Dialogic narratives of literacy, teaching, and schooling: Preparing literacy teachers for diverse settings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Literacy; Pedagogy; Narrative; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Internship; Diversity (politics); Reading (process); Teacher education; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.07074954043479754,"score_gpt":0.5086552986787163,"score_spread":0.43790575824391875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007867453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688904,0.00019394391,0.0001119023,0.0014678907,0.00011483819,0.0005202963,0.000012405533,0.000060608796,0.028627671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871679,0.000012067281,0.0049839453,0.00003944652,0.0006729047,0.000046415644,0.000013941602,0.000014124744,0.007049263],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746984,0.0008914766,0.00030791646,0.00032388882,0.00044657727,0.00056027126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794364,0.0011837684,0.00012989962,0.00018337733,0.0003709511,0.00018836299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049750274,0.0001140303,0.00019010082,0.00033466215,0.0012777252,0.00041056742,0.0002497133,0.00010232555,0.000028106118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001848954,0.000110025365,0.00007172109,0.00024958208,0.00039918753,0.0005910975,0.00002643843,0.0005103211,0.000008292148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032399108,0.0001081316,0.0075734556,0.00007852852,0.000013397546,8.504277e-7,0.8313571,0.0000010913315,0.002335057,0.02741242,0.0045189946,0.12656859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012736153,0.0009138183,0.010979904,0.00059758825,0.000020630585,0.00000368041,0.34972924,0.0007078168,0.00045194113,0.048110854,0.5866605,0.0005504303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012625659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028905156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58214146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012506581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002919867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99394935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020107345","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.3.5","title":"What Will Be the Social Implications and Interactions of Schooling in the Next Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snippet; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11433614965617431,"score_gpt":0.4729241195001972,"score_spread":0.35858796984402286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020107345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8353667,0.0004682554,0.0000010264017,0.14832957,0.00008645697,0.0002478043,0.000004797453,0.0000073803812,0.015487961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962457,0.0016087211,0.000010308479,0.00026196198,0.00031381243,0.000043690266,0.0000027729204,0.000003776898,0.0015092683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986868,0.00033445726,0.00015472788,0.00011432181,0.00038671496,0.00032299123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907106,0.0005694916,0.000030613184,0.00014311381,0.00013178558,0.00005391694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016230709,0.00004821146,0.00007109391,0.00008668697,0.0014799734,0.00039053155,0.0003490907,0.00004154159,0.000103151826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010168543,0.000026667969,0.000039650356,0.00059812877,0.00058274553,0.00068612344,0.000010825902,0.0003108429,0.000015204378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018711316,0.00014523815,0.0009090367,0.000013621724,0.000021327565,6.022851e-7,0.5728249,0.000005385221,0.0004312378,0.18836334,0.024927642,0.21233898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009438452,0.00007094618,0.047510907,0.000056188816,0.000004387036,0.000004692536,0.6136642,0.000028095772,0.000004433028,0.01851673,0.31998035,0.00006466691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015144056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004011167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098035314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016025326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067316683","doi":"10.1598/rrq.45.4.4","title":"Teaching Argument and Explanation to Prepare Junior Students for Writing to Learn","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thames Valley Children's Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics education; Teaching method; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06365108727258365,"score_gpt":0.48616218599494465,"score_spread":0.42251109872236103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067316683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848271,0.000006357805,0.00029522364,0.007644734,0.00020861023,0.000877616,0.0000057983984,0.00008360589,0.006050947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907569,0.0000018606944,0.0032366102,0.00008544444,0.0009480238,0.00025442932,0.000007339855,0.000016746711,0.0046925982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780804,0.00030112106,0.00019041843,0.0003526401,0.00077664317,0.0005711123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830884,0.0008249998,0.000035088106,0.0001647722,0.00030855276,0.00035774513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008879327,0.000078432815,0.000108477434,0.00032120277,0.0017825195,0.00073005084,0.00028849588,0.00007302263,0.000015730307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021467404,0.00008612215,0.000025088993,0.00022472712,0.000056911293,0.00020758486,0.0000344271,0.0003301526,0.000031548378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062012994,0.00021762135,0.020129351,0.00011743234,0.000021896984,0.0000026526184,0.40973434,0.0000019979639,0.038346317,0.036938924,0.0117764855,0.48265097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012014635,0.0025476564,0.03213994,0.0011029225,0.000022948645,0.0000075027374,0.62268746,0.00024459287,0.0013983503,0.008073998,0.32973617,0.0008369984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020211583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032005813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48181397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013787633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111230525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076250769","doi":"10.1598/rrq.37.2.4","title":"The expertise of literacy teachers: A continuum from preschool to Grade 5","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.07080091642741987,"score_gpt":0.4034184816565816,"score_spread":0.33261756522916175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076250769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764841,0.0019065387,0.00020146654,0.002444022,0.0005165619,0.0006642347,0.000024133067,0.000088365516,0.017670538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568866,0.00002433658,0.00065609155,0.00007968413,0.0002981677,0.00032472005,0.000006264824,0.000038954073,0.041685212],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962813,0.0008818602,0.00058232987,0.00055390946,0.0007547382,0.0009458193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965712,0.0017194151,0.000097867385,0.0010120355,0.00025175692,0.0003477574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016271323,0.00019772712,0.0002894934,0.00030937986,0.00034985965,0.00035554517,0.00076788303,0.000119130156,0.0008546535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037541983,0.0001433443,0.00010925811,0.0005510994,0.00016583962,0.00020935653,0.000051991577,0.00061208947,0.0018777531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011795777,0.00026938875,0.004178418,0.000009489499,0.00015625592,0.000057596357,0.32031527,1.8735209e-7,0.009270435,0.0010588177,0.2162262,0.44833997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029589527,0.0032601755,0.09697749,0.001092141,0.000033471064,0.00004543307,0.030172838,0.0004534354,0.0045173424,0.0055994396,0.85393125,0.0009580215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014350897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003588127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.637705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001440652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025840485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098709039","doi":"10.1598/rrq.44.3.5","title":"Shaping New Literacies Research: Extrapolations From a Review of the Handbook of Research on New Literacies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Literacy; Sociology; Library science; Art; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6055139591330078,"score_gpt":0.5318540950288034,"score_spread":0.07365986410420433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098709039","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012139093,0.9861693,0.0000051215347,0.0016670756,0.00072708406,0.0024751246,0.00027365642,0.000047401034,0.008513884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00020664156,0.94914657,0.0001523273,0.00007553311,0.004640219,0.00015883833,0.00030602168,0.000092987175,0.04522089],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98601425,0.0052720592,0.0019959481,0.000981017,0.0042393296,0.0014973815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825199,0.011051556,0.00062165677,0.0022140893,0.0030695812,0.00052320224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105227465,0.0005456236,0.0019252215,0.002730888,0.0014505215,0.0011528748,0.0021909943,0.00032088917,0.0019434515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003036876,0.00036736985,0.0008511314,0.001982544,0.0015892013,0.0007949154,0.00017521222,0.003756802,0.00041233696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019450432,0.00014204133,0.0000019031745,0.029472653,0.00009948046,0.0000040463315,0.21996531,3.1236336e-8,0.000003194909,0.00970008,0.13216701,0.6084248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010674333,0.0005507362,0.000005491972,0.33416238,0.00007885278,0.0000035098083,0.0066002863,0.0000023002947,0.00000825663,0.013983301,0.64429384,0.00020433031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046650697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034034054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60822046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052301405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044427877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133526395","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.3.2","title":"Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read: Evidence From the National Reading Panel's Meta‐Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1463,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Phonemic awareness; Phonics; Reading (process); Psychology; Phonological awareness; Meta-analysis; Cognitive psychology; Primary education; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.22592793093124172,"score_gpt":0.4431507052678233,"score_spread":0.21722277433658158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133526395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98794246,0.00084134465,0.0018730506,0.0044019446,0.0004255149,0.0006976126,0.000066263,0.00018644052,0.0035653785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876779,0.000086660504,0.00077503757,0.00028077827,0.00068260287,0.00039270084,0.0001445721,0.000051510247,0.009908244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340516,0.0016282265,0.00070349296,0.001213453,0.0018774841,0.001172178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948029,0.003063676,0.00017574335,0.00090849254,0.00068343093,0.00036576643],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005604086,0.00035157622,0.00069822563,0.0011523386,0.00092494657,0.00053220254,0.0010579571,0.00020469305,0.0022286207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006349146,0.00026386895,0.00045515478,0.003753609,0.0002253623,0.00048340583,0.00009337578,0.000927309,0.0018601639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016150501,0.0005942847,0.4710527,0.000044588065,0.12780653,0.00021652787,0.16358185,0.0008261228,0.007666114,0.0047884067,0.049792454,0.17201537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012600751,0.00092756655,0.94751376,0.00036287942,0.010599732,0.0002793025,0.012035741,0.0005969868,0.0005733995,0.004201091,0.020259447,0.001390019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023725832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005891767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47646105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048116056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020773278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136227657","doi":"10.1598/rrq.43.2.2","title":"The Influence of Reading Skills on the Missing‐Letter Effect Among Elementary School Students","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Humanities; Disengagement theory; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02478861075547189,"score_gpt":0.3828286074422796,"score_spread":0.3580399966868077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136227657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914505,0.00011025111,0.000009583999,0.0023007072,0.00028708068,0.00088766374,0.0000047807866,0.000054665226,0.0048947637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891275,0.00005639049,0.000047164136,0.00042192827,0.00022700378,0.00026877472,0.0000055560777,0.000044635286,0.009801029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394184,0.00198416,0.0006528925,0.00057132496,0.0017360615,0.0011136973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922331,0.0059570065,0.00019268804,0.0011615186,0.00021360078,0.0002421142],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006277562,0.00028393505,0.00032617844,0.00033953093,0.0014452009,0.00024596546,0.0013807986,0.00012040419,0.00019235336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056071085,0.00015996717,0.0001355108,0.00064703124,0.00069080543,0.00019965599,0.00009033845,0.0011674842,0.0008444709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058181427,0.00044991216,0.69775146,0.00009125378,0.00071293075,0.0004556662,0.052425474,0.000021335709,0.0074241394,0.0019569143,0.17877172,0.059357375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010918044,0.0023551069,0.96557504,0.0011857162,0.000021359669,0.00006445066,0.0019663316,0.000019753572,0.0025371278,0.0008052043,0.02400993,0.00036820077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054649037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000781468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26782355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031974926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009821024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158418180","doi":"10.1598/rrq.35.1.5","title":"How Will Literacy Be Defined in the New Millennium?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snippet; Literacy; Diversity (politics); Mathematics education; Critical literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.054153741979785404,"score_gpt":0.3880990483623227,"score_spread":0.3339453063825373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158418180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86229616,0.001521488,0.00008081872,0.03833733,0.0003452113,0.0007641303,0.00001103645,0.00011673945,0.09652708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.853529,0.00008949445,0.0005297537,0.00053406367,0.0003899857,0.00013924234,0.000030163632,0.000038023933,0.1447203],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585736,0.0010836632,0.00037947003,0.0006229182,0.0008521965,0.0012043677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974554,0.0012482941,0.000045875677,0.00090885366,0.00010678613,0.00023478887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026095284,0.00023630334,0.00027213534,0.0005185992,0.00026879448,0.0007987434,0.00084583124,0.00015911109,0.0019393519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011028763,0.00016878388,0.00010065747,0.001132271,0.00012499081,0.00048034193,0.000016485714,0.0009505149,0.0010731404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001725711,0.00019049202,0.0016665235,0.00001896436,0.000040315037,0.00029049476,0.13930994,6.1733596e-7,0.0002241806,0.0065602423,0.20866552,0.6428601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010450925,0.0007341,0.021914707,0.00015520981,0.0000055419637,0.00012500738,0.0055868267,0.00003705323,0.000026715896,0.0029800253,0.9671124,0.00027731317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012051706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053196985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7584469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014042023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012557766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161547889","doi":"10.1598/rrq.36.1.1","title":"Access to Print in Low‐Income and Middle‐Income Communities: An Ecological Study of Four Neighborhoods","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":508,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Harvard University; American Educational Research Association","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Low income; Variety (cybernetics); Early literacy; Sociology; Geography; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.17692506354047158,"score_gpt":0.4348460564145016,"score_spread":0.25792099287403003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161547889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850599,0.000009880853,0.00001248511,0.0004238858,0.000044208944,0.0008276261,0.0000016072098,0.00007366408,0.013546702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995462,0.000030996704,0.00007124745,0.000019294035,0.000037377642,0.00006673607,0.0000016122978,0.000010021671,0.00021655734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738246,0.0006918118,0.00035730278,0.00027664637,0.00063797337,0.00065378455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984201,0.00075352547,0.00005106969,0.0003605261,0.00017118089,0.00024360372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002915127,0.000116505675,0.0002925041,0.00079019915,0.00038913736,0.0003370161,0.0009874367,0.00013791873,0.000067441215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027172378,0.00010734675,0.000023070195,0.0013106545,0.0003642792,0.0005664031,0.00028821174,0.00042364295,0.00001569191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006535843,0.0008965336,0.90522903,0.000021883545,0.000011437501,0.000070001486,0.0714757,0.00000178605,0.000016033553,0.007663604,0.0000056319964,0.01454298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005442641,0.0024465916,0.8769204,0.00014012029,0.0000013894523,0.0000034099467,0.111092895,0.000032998087,0.000006453624,0.008493888,0.000175591,0.000142016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077681667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060052905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05228474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020466812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013432627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309039982","doi":"10.1002/rrq.139","title":"First‐Language Longitudinal Predictors of Second‐Language Literacy in Young L2 Learners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Reading (process); Literacy; Longitudinal study; Cognition; Linguistics; Rhyme; Phonemic awareness; Learning to read; Word recognition; Metalinguistics; Developmental psychology; Vocabulary development; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.027461094669164087,"score_gpt":0.37557339981132276,"score_spread":0.3481123051421587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309039982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816698,0.00047219242,0.00011405237,0.00029260162,0.0005348588,0.00037260397,0.000038938764,0.000082699895,0.016422287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96648085,0.000016838569,0.00019412866,0.000010968148,0.00022588344,0.00011293115,0.000015417709,0.000051284856,0.032891713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959648,0.00059556984,0.00073374034,0.0007446818,0.00077830936,0.0011828694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973733,0.0012278921,0.00015091867,0.0008173306,0.00017044973,0.0002601093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027222172,0.0002653682,0.00042934009,0.0012070419,0.00012941241,0.00010419228,0.00057891675,0.00019252575,0.0027145962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002799173,0.00019735374,0.00012541343,0.00084633596,0.00027641607,0.00041627948,0.000057851543,0.0005689941,0.000654325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003734542,0.00033334765,0.52590746,0.00020186938,0.0001729465,0.00068460614,0.35123396,7.7304514e-7,0.021555856,0.0014290054,0.0045858747,0.09352085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035851053,0.0019984285,0.94727284,0.0022588593,0.000017230506,0.00019483078,0.0349224,0.00004378709,0.0028657587,0.0004558975,0.005669477,0.00071540975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015344783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005371681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42136538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032210205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010262633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543361460","doi":"","title":"International Reports on Literary Research: Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literary criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.08907368780371366,"score_gpt":0.39124585306398224,"score_spread":0.3021721652602686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543361460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07161957,0.00017887694,0.000002507542,0.005409248,0.0013805273,0.0002508213,0.000012832353,0.000036108,0.9211095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977297,0.00007539228,0.000033829703,0.00009604656,0.0004566437,0.000030561278,0.0000072446633,0.000014680034,0.10155588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947132,0.0012917644,0.00021210162,0.0003583722,0.002605803,0.0008187904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978804,0.0007054627,0.000037906044,0.0003461105,0.0005664468,0.00046368226],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007410976,0.00006418094,0.00010079516,0.0012503499,0.0024494792,0.0010198124,0.00036369497,0.00008292337,0.0017372185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021390999,0.00008235822,0.00004242283,0.0008524618,0.0006802836,0.0002651668,0.000013485687,0.0007514035,0.00019444845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001677188,0.00006510766,0.0006748469,0.000012383572,0.000022259113,0.0016571552,0.023196932,6.7812505e-7,0.00013354275,0.17124693,0.7632798,0.0396936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057636364,0.000096149,0.00042947746,0.000048277325,7.072482e-7,0.000010003138,0.0042102314,0.0000017538688,0.000013062862,0.009213691,0.9858343,0.00008468095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98807627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8261102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049342597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007158982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607695438","doi":"10.1002/rrq.189","title":"Reading‐Related Causal Attributions for Success and Failure: Dynamic Links With Reading Skill","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Brock University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Reading (process); Fluency; Reading comprehension; Phonological awareness; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Literacy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037301860076271315,"score_gpt":0.40427564731657395,"score_spread":0.3669737872403026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607695438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973753,0.00017014128,0.0030951295,0.0049060625,0.00074865785,0.00168326,0.00014632265,0.00028826995,0.015209165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679033,0.000025574898,0.0018217132,0.000030460436,0.00017213031,0.0004839353,0.00016243882,0.000101722275,0.029298697],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955222,0.0003665368,0.00061699393,0.0011638065,0.0006645604,0.0016659193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584216,0.0012886835,0.00031092347,0.0014408958,0.00061388506,0.0005034618],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033775459,0.00040935766,0.0005635941,0.00067251385,0.0028928046,0.0012340257,0.0008614223,0.00055755523,0.00016401439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048329993,0.00035365223,0.00010631043,0.00037351032,0.0006958339,0.00065124483,0.00009664524,0.0015095366,0.00023863406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002571762,0.0013179774,0.21324828,0.0009865073,0.0031541875,0.0015424646,0.13514824,0.000013674634,0.011976497,0.26058567,0.0667048,0.30274993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01878167,0.0138447285,0.7480108,0.005633341,0.00048100742,0.0024961075,0.021882648,0.0058539114,0.0013396324,0.027781675,0.14909217,0.0048023122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092209614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019027792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5347625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036112452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018422947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744221549","doi":"10.1002/rrq.199","title":"“I'll Show You How to Write My Name”: The Contribution of Naturalistic Sibling Teaching to the Home Literacy Environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Spelling; Literacy; Vocabulary; Psychology; Reading (process); Sibling; Meaning (existential); Developmental psychology; Naturalism; Vocabulary development; Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04528609023466993,"score_gpt":0.39633144197274356,"score_spread":0.3510453517380736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744221549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519714,0.00041879877,0.0029531291,0.038540933,0.0009313781,0.0014279168,0.000047419937,0.000052867435,0.003656134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896927,0.0000132028845,0.0005701761,0.000238462,0.0004963983,0.00024379947,0.000025686955,0.00003755839,0.009405471],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956255,0.001111321,0.00045617938,0.00066062715,0.0010685956,0.0010777955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957596,0.0015326054,0.00022105199,0.0019376952,0.00025147272,0.0002975889],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007574001,0.00026127344,0.00035168312,0.00040226924,0.0021128883,0.0014080366,0.0016923446,0.00012784761,0.000102259466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011016378,0.00016078683,0.00013079467,0.00021602823,0.00022978299,0.00035368625,0.00021243026,0.001231811,0.00066414586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005909403,0.00029978494,0.01448607,0.00007093228,0.0003745193,0.00012035497,0.21233341,0.000044388926,0.012729693,0.029807635,0.030719941,0.6984223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001642277,0.0025087628,0.23073512,0.0012805995,0.00006501159,0.00010046962,0.013764539,0.00092182914,0.0008828661,0.002608469,0.7445899,0.00090013334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006254531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022679355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030538053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005212787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759664057","doi":"10.1002/rrq.205","title":"Different Measures of Print Exposure Predict Different Aspects of Vocabulary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Vocabulary; Checklist; Psychology; Reading (process); Developmental psychology; Nonverbal communication; Vocabulary development; Exploratory factor analysis; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Teaching method; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.09636295835396823,"score_gpt":0.38958874943272626,"score_spread":0.293225791078758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759664057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656069,0.0003223411,0.00023579504,0.00026414098,0.0005684373,0.0004978146,0.000022013994,0.00004598993,0.03243655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678546,0.000028498232,0.00007287638,0.0000045898596,0.00016654257,0.00010160022,0.000011962194,0.000039465824,0.002789003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605703,0.0005820708,0.0007179599,0.0005693298,0.001293886,0.0007797129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966609,0.00047294528,0.00038139644,0.0018229438,0.00040200126,0.00025981152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016770378,0.00026929795,0.00062326516,0.00045630426,0.00036271458,0.00013979722,0.0010918768,0.00018165403,0.00024506028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030009475,0.0002039997,0.00018277967,0.00011113503,0.00045513056,0.00013695202,0.0001250523,0.0005950129,0.00005829499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009430875,0.0021747493,0.4286517,0.00073709275,0.0011449209,0.00022095456,0.05827894,0.0000016640571,0.0811137,0.05279664,0.003956406,0.36998013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011449677,0.0023450723,0.9719003,0.000733211,0.000024477753,0.000018960753,0.0014386178,0.00002858737,0.017170398,0.0037923884,0.0011672609,0.00023580379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046033898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044254633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54324853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012536973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009024808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83188665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808941137","doi":"10.1002/rrq.219","title":"Inferring Meaning From Meaningful Parts: The Contributions of Morphological Skills to the Development of Children's Reading Comprehension","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Comprehension; Reading (process); Meaning (existential); Vocabulary development; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04790437941204884,"score_gpt":0.3850245340826453,"score_spread":0.3371201546705965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808941137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870738,0.00007869098,0.0040969756,0.00075226364,0.00039144166,0.0007253733,0.000049027076,0.000062576175,0.0067698923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608546,0.0000030767387,0.0029647714,0.0000920834,0.00031639382,0.00011271261,0.000045957233,0.000029395016,0.0003501598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554634,0.0010188046,0.0009877515,0.0005819585,0.00096655416,0.0008985901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995463,0.0023536375,0.00025952628,0.0009260823,0.00079608493,0.00020163778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046691066,0.00024687732,0.00045236145,0.00033974778,0.0009878345,0.00010569665,0.00093377155,0.00015175928,0.0003054061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006434713,0.00014908113,0.00010793697,0.00087249535,0.00048711497,0.000104812876,0.00020417583,0.0006590595,0.00040939788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057119003,0.00083416566,0.04478722,0.00003713743,0.00118932,0.00005135061,0.6420641,0.00005169126,0.09510337,0.028575493,0.018330628,0.16840434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036733865,0.0043758075,0.729457,0.0035723539,0.00015913651,0.00024505888,0.05464519,0.0005850407,0.12248961,0.0050044353,0.07429461,0.0014983175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008120829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008267273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68466985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001470744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014879215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7597725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2852458049","doi":"10.1002/rrq.220","title":"Investigating Linguistically Diverse Adolescents’ Literacy Trajectories Using Latent Transition Modeling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Latent class model; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.11549804313377386,"score_gpt":0.419368663664922,"score_spread":0.3038706205311481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2852458049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97649395,0.00007583743,0.018720794,0.000116500916,0.0010469084,0.00036310425,0.000012048614,0.00018994181,0.0029809193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916045,0.0000030039525,0.006218894,0.00010003333,0.0014991639,0.00003223522,0.000024123237,0.000060355378,0.00045766594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593735,0.0006353621,0.0006351039,0.000756665,0.00085036724,0.001185166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978769,0.00023181358,0.00008849849,0.0004995369,0.0009032245,0.00040006483],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002133203,0.00027932384,0.0003123788,0.0005681167,0.0008797483,0.0004292551,0.0003612748,0.00019148055,0.00024732907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030340327,0.00027298872,0.00010741262,0.0007394621,0.00037659556,0.00032205263,0.000037586262,0.0007636124,0.00050879695],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000588551,0.0007864323,0.031465225,0.000520889,0.00036497146,0.0004190832,0.7764143,0.0003910655,0.0301415,0.012355844,0.0012268363,0.14532536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060744956,0.0064054383,0.0342182,0.012271398,0.00022222214,0.00046086113,0.044773534,0.86038107,0.0018995343,0.026332764,0.003600703,0.0033597688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013098044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013939012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030605745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013949024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905973569","doi":"10.1002/rrq.240","title":"Preservice Teacher Knowledge, Print Exposure, and Planning for Instruction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Knowledge level; Lesson plan; Relation (database); Language arts; Literacy; Plan (archaeology); Pedagogy; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08768900833088598,"score_gpt":0.4391027739527477,"score_spread":0.3514137656218617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905973569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446777,0.000340427,0.0008492718,0.00015460527,0.000737862,0.0005274936,0.0000037898003,0.00010292771,0.052605897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781987,0.0000028015565,0.0016310925,0.000017538054,0.0010722145,0.00029063437,0.000009766247,0.000036950896,0.018740319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792,0.00030613365,0.0002928536,0.0005369089,0.00025766622,0.0006864698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850136,0.00041123788,0.0000569917,0.00039266387,0.00045198033,0.00018577803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002073267,0.00015165356,0.00018450183,0.00039384133,0.00043329794,0.000183918,0.00023959072,0.00014627304,0.00015156143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013795345,0.00013807345,0.000037179514,0.0003177973,0.00018813396,0.00018333153,0.00004460026,0.00035389466,0.00026894864],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079407985,0.00024866968,0.03188877,0.00022857996,0.00020749768,0.000017287968,0.21197782,2.8931197e-7,0.002709523,0.012324004,0.03187257,0.7077309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049886173,0.008977447,0.3665583,0.0009374119,0.00003538275,0.00019878002,0.033789553,0.0012090337,0.001739753,0.012978261,0.5676305,0.00095691555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014247408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017451708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.706774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009708666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058733185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5630472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945523118","doi":"10.1002/rrq.257","title":"The Role of Awareness of Cross‐Language Suffix Correspondences in Second‐Language Reading Comprehension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Suffix; Linguistics; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary; Psychology; Reading (process); Computer science","score_opus":0.027211689601034674,"score_gpt":0.4066509382764872,"score_spread":0.37943924867545253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945523118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794248,0.0015624469,0.000007834037,0.000034542107,0.0004570036,0.0004745173,0.000019327808,0.000030711937,0.017988868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988269,0.000013262817,0.000065519715,0.000007751326,0.00005380043,0.00004531955,0.000017642764,0.000030963067,0.011496772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961116,0.00095923257,0.0007789138,0.0005128037,0.00081095693,0.0008264919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953626,0.0031092674,0.00024119015,0.0008800031,0.00029381498,0.000113117894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041113906,0.00019820592,0.00045118728,0.0006559742,0.00018512142,0.00012697963,0.00075711275,0.00016504263,0.0006848547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001796693,0.00014946083,0.000103180464,0.0008425672,0.0003456091,0.00021091053,0.000073622876,0.0006236371,0.00026300258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010469769,0.00025871952,0.3395193,0.00022315147,0.00010561757,0.00009357322,0.28496107,0.000014242846,0.24912617,0.00826276,0.00038957718,0.115998834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002802598,0.0024774992,0.56310606,0.001840196,0.000013545257,0.00008524547,0.3562264,0.0013490296,0.06103918,0.002207571,0.008162185,0.00069047674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026577592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019957797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22358677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115803996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016606657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74986786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982549819","doi":"10.1002/rrq.279","title":"Question Asking During Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Corpus Study of How Question Type Influences the Linguistic Complexity of Primary School Students’ Responses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Linguistics; Mathematics education; Syntax; Socioeconomic status; Population","score_opus":0.08620654445574574,"score_gpt":0.4136968686712713,"score_spread":0.3274903242155256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982549819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99642813,0.00016485115,0.000019458936,0.00008592311,0.00094789686,0.0011710194,0.00000460011,0.0000781998,0.0010999433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766874,0.00001619683,0.0002760153,0.000008343835,0.00016283557,0.000050632312,0.000013396963,0.0000316123,0.0017722191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940552,0.0026429151,0.0007274713,0.0005849182,0.0014645939,0.0005249002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642855,0.0011862305,0.0004405616,0.0008126753,0.0010032711,0.00012873967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043000854,0.00023401451,0.0005122923,0.0007286938,0.00040741405,0.00019251733,0.00061966124,0.00012962794,0.00006148618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007305077,0.00018709073,0.0000671745,0.0009911091,0.000341777,0.00024265198,0.00011944477,0.0007618989,0.00007525956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024637603,0.00069577474,0.89869624,0.00037128545,0.00025362862,0.000043390683,0.045795333,0.000031214448,0.04192636,0.0031142365,0.000073326984,0.006535459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015162434,0.0028557735,0.97850573,0.0011580753,0.000029599636,0.00006156348,0.014297077,0.00006173027,0.0005015767,0.0006564195,0.00016107949,0.00019514337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018087358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045616995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07980949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003536753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015477702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76293385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983930248","doi":"10.1002/rrq.289","title":"Automaticity and Control: How Do Executive Functions and Reading Fluency Interact in Predicting Reading Comprehension?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Fluency; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Executive functions; Automaticity; Comprehension; Cognition; Verbal fluency test; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Neuropsychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.029389259795921028,"score_gpt":0.35451485013846395,"score_spread":0.3251255903425429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983930248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98143333,0.00029008946,0.0003725452,0.00064763025,0.00054555474,0.00096941355,0.00001966873,0.000166984,0.015554764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937618,0.000022407665,0.0003832445,0.00005156676,0.00011829411,0.000134055,0.000016699312,0.00005443226,0.0054575093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573,0.0010361482,0.0006061448,0.0009113483,0.0005743639,0.0011420072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566853,0.0030177021,0.0001755422,0.0005592576,0.00024614096,0.00033285623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031727909,0.00034341333,0.0006188539,0.0011433435,0.00041773607,0.00057323545,0.00025108666,0.0002231648,0.00013762049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035992186,0.00032075547,0.00006617383,0.00070289534,0.00021325372,0.0006504419,0.000087225235,0.0012015981,0.00019944958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048741593,0.00024468827,0.78552836,0.00031118063,0.00029758416,0.00018448355,0.11183239,0.000005960064,0.018111672,0.0061839153,0.0030357882,0.07377656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006095691,0.0027332609,0.8658432,0.0040702517,0.000061613835,0.0005594721,0.101147175,0.010784707,0.00017010418,0.002906995,0.004530468,0.0010970648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006775232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025124562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08031483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002922535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072466544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013212602","doi":"10.1002/rrq.306","title":"The Capaciousness of No: Affective Refusals as Literacy Practices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre of Excellence for Coherent X-Ray Science, Australian Research Council; Arts and Humanities Research Council; British Academy","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Literacy; Feeling; Silence; Psychology; Normative; Gesture; Humanism; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.12682697600094436,"score_gpt":0.48586000842052157,"score_spread":0.3590330324195772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013212602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75921625,0.00030168344,0.00003096947,0.034064133,0.00023816762,0.0006694213,0.000011262032,0.00008070217,0.20538738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972033,0.00018821287,0.000038156053,0.000104131024,0.00047393487,0.000030193609,0.0000013183301,0.000014816519,0.0019459202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958258,0.0018541762,0.00020810681,0.0002856547,0.0012581395,0.00056812476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992065,0.006169429,0.00027625446,0.00025247358,0.0010012107,0.00023559389],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006471785,0.00009325961,0.00017052214,0.000068838955,0.0016986013,0.0005790564,0.0006448964,0.00010684294,0.00006947865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008836242,0.000067395216,0.000073473886,0.00052935514,0.00094229594,0.0005965985,0.000041147752,0.000775832,0.0003786647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025409422,0.00013741318,0.0004845427,0.00010632563,0.00009785125,0.00004753788,0.5021801,2.5842434e-7,0.025921939,0.40681788,0.0037141987,0.060237844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056810986,0.004682472,0.001162587,0.00032647795,0.00002501072,0.0000047280196,0.121821746,0.00025587468,0.005960096,0.10380013,0.760954,0.00043872572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006691114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005541885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010011808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015724012","doi":"10.1002/rrq.312","title":"Pluriversal Literacies: Affect and Relationality in Vulnerable Times","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Literacy; Critical literacy; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.08210068595881978,"score_gpt":0.4374578562524066,"score_spread":0.3553571702935868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015724012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654406,0.0002588851,0.000008552275,0.045740336,0.000074346135,0.00025710522,0.000009038802,0.00003769418,0.08817341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962119,0.000052333842,0.00008922007,0.000187272,0.00026531893,0.0000100047255,0.0000055954847,0.0000045829715,0.0031737944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832356,0.0004243757,0.00012554617,0.00019720686,0.00053608353,0.00039321382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990183,0.0005370676,0.000022488284,0.00007038406,0.00011162208,0.00024010826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018051282,0.00005807795,0.000098984216,0.00009360002,0.0005722019,0.00016764157,0.0001503643,0.00006653133,0.00014189385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067557476,0.000048069658,0.000026137499,0.00055079727,0.00034821164,0.00033712026,0.00002064644,0.00034176724,0.00009892763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060953746,0.00008617513,0.023989767,0.00007188933,0.000020589912,0.000014758416,0.35688153,0.0000252995,0.00034145336,0.57984996,0.0253675,0.013290134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001172765,0.0012408352,0.14187337,0.00027122817,0.0000088047045,0.0000053893577,0.17856684,0.0024904213,0.00006647739,0.22359198,0.4501317,0.00058018917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009072689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043725388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42476422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001624305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023633066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087164176","doi":"10.1002/rrq.344","title":"When Did You Learn It? How Background Knowledge Impacts Attention and Comprehension in Read‐Aloud Activities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Knowledge level; Think aloud protocol; Mathematics education; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12676432519471462,"score_gpt":0.4036361440174629,"score_spread":0.27687181882274825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087164176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812736,0.0004961294,0.00007713172,0.0069574467,0.0003015493,0.00043306258,0.0000066509733,0.00009835344,0.01035608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866496,0.00005957028,0.00015192149,0.000107789114,0.00026876025,0.000047286798,0.000037636517,0.000049706825,0.012627748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635935,0.0010313162,0.00037506432,0.00077506684,0.00051740184,0.0009417907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836767,0.00062957045,0.000092611306,0.0003716776,0.00013281987,0.00040568045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013788751,0.00026255136,0.00041577275,0.000534654,0.00027850634,0.00046709785,0.00024635944,0.00019577882,0.0002398318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010352253,0.00024752383,0.00006238479,0.00052946014,0.00017932661,0.00049586577,0.000081680744,0.0009292074,0.00045485818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008541578,0.00064318744,0.018729206,0.0006157375,0.00020240385,0.00036939463,0.5532133,0.0000014311187,0.05290484,0.0024132396,0.101704665,0.26834843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008227721,0.0091201095,0.43344384,0.0026847918,0.000048139973,0.00025227026,0.3424708,0.0023421054,0.0004900595,0.0021169244,0.1969943,0.0018089168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005725388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012407909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41471463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002106175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000737174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110540817","doi":"10.1002/rrq.362","title":"Determinants of Word‐Reading Development in English Learner University Students: A Longitudinal Eye Movement Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vocabulary; Vocabulary development; Phonological awareness; Word recognition; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Eye movement; Linguistics; Word processing; Cognition; Literacy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07081546507337637,"score_gpt":0.3959614170325909,"score_spread":0.32514595195921453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110540817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99556273,0.000040141935,0.000050609407,0.000082781095,0.00023220107,0.0009494672,0.0000050862077,0.00008190398,0.0029950563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955558,0.0000050318085,0.00032523094,0.000029123425,0.00009983356,0.000047217512,0.0000065832396,0.000037481062,0.0038936893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496496,0.00090433034,0.0008065412,0.00092984014,0.0013704688,0.0010238682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825007,0.00038040557,0.00017640919,0.00046171265,0.00036807478,0.00036335664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003221869,0.00028962299,0.00058600126,0.00079257786,0.00024089369,0.00012242027,0.0009521857,0.00012169138,0.00028323405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002080972,0.00029691536,0.000078912846,0.0013754041,0.00012082309,0.00026228797,0.00021781688,0.000749242,0.00023271047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037524913,0.0010043691,0.7477142,0.00006000069,0.00012379025,0.0006062042,0.21804537,0.0000034137583,0.00016701104,0.00013003935,0.00042644131,0.031343885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002677806,0.0017520487,0.8867675,0.00032170484,0.0000154686,0.0000019203756,0.10274678,0.000045839468,0.0002644463,0.000025311574,0.0050218226,0.0003593502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067155185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019033531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13905329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051932165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020077107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154245982","doi":"10.1002/rrq.400","title":"How Chinese–English Bilingual Fourth Graders Draw on Syntactic Awareness in Reading Comprehension: Within‐ and Cross‐Language Effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Syntax; Reading (process); Comprehension; Sentence; Psychology; Language transfer; Metalinguistic awareness; Comprehension approach; Computer science; Language education","score_opus":0.03512616220468784,"score_gpt":0.39831617413341547,"score_spread":0.36319001192872763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154245982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99354696,0.0005870945,0.00006682313,0.00055270613,0.0014986184,0.00048580044,0.00000790258,0.00015815314,0.0030959668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938768,0.000016886024,0.000423508,0.00010019601,0.00040601604,0.00009367458,0.00005069005,0.000080958416,0.004951273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462384,0.001457511,0.0005031428,0.0012559679,0.0009269416,0.0012325866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459106,0.0036459095,0.00012769998,0.00086858345,0.00038211962,0.0003846028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002177333,0.00041904103,0.00062176544,0.00088838354,0.00050900824,0.0011017894,0.00034674234,0.00028127982,0.00004569456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015644891,0.00037083705,0.000104320985,0.0013521035,0.0002845551,0.00038710152,0.00008289093,0.0014823256,0.000067110646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094071403,0.001001217,0.35290065,0.0012775955,0.0004315724,0.013875811,0.5160773,0.000046729794,0.020821813,0.008666562,0.0011480994,0.08281196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012346111,0.0051694005,0.7847861,0.007198146,0.00007725992,0.0014875667,0.16301358,0.0018411122,0.012039663,0.004556409,0.004471448,0.0030132167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005156025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001716016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43188545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002796428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029387098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154768473","doi":"10.1002/rrq.397","title":"Informing the Science of Reading: Students’ Awareness of Sentence‐Level Information Is Important for Reading Comprehension","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Sentence; Comprehension; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Reading motivation; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12106546290694364,"score_gpt":0.44550638821210753,"score_spread":0.3244409253051639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154768473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936946,0.00007732804,0.0018275083,0.00041734072,0.00057932053,0.00068912836,0.00006570523,0.000034381585,0.0026146674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996898,0.000025738005,0.0015669736,0.00006338776,0.00005992235,0.00010821302,0.00005136207,0.000019764191,0.0012066474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952835,0.00021587915,0.0012906652,0.00044609184,0.0018732237,0.0008906275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474376,0.0012897113,0.00049288175,0.0009057667,0.0023942671,0.00017360103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068821516,0.00021222065,0.0004493172,0.0008108664,0.0006916618,0.00026742934,0.0009818361,0.000120566954,0.00006423655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060567015,0.00016397997,0.00013945985,0.0017948868,0.00057379034,0.00090645987,0.00016972749,0.00038732841,0.000032751737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008396772,0.00064157316,0.09796903,0.0011742134,0.00049775233,0.000048505226,0.4316191,0.00002500321,0.14476176,0.058095444,0.0070524225,0.25727552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00691213,0.005040957,0.2734255,0.0066877296,0.00017709933,0.00064640056,0.31503907,0.0071538235,0.33357686,0.010350403,0.039177306,0.0018127235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005750375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006849588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2554628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022106852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000726954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6686909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158386961","doi":"10.1002/rrq.406","title":"What Matters Most? Toward a Robust and Socially Just Science of Reading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Reading motivation; Literacy; Focus (optics); Nature versus nurture; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09650224216147076,"score_gpt":0.4100861520123437,"score_spread":0.313583909850873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158386961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97054887,0.0008992433,0.0003210766,0.008998389,0.00141411,0.00033743097,0.0000097606335,0.00008238161,0.017388731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735297,0.00016212816,0.002754674,0.00025864132,0.00015678396,0.000048588474,0.000012490201,0.00003905179,0.009214658],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621695,0.00040321177,0.00047527187,0.0008057035,0.0010507592,0.0010480917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997663,0.00061915274,0.00011091774,0.00055246806,0.00073942606,0.00031502228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037966236,0.0001888494,0.00035417976,0.00066509267,0.00045872666,0.0007880991,0.00045315965,0.000121778954,0.000308788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002446623,0.00018764856,0.0000614459,0.001640803,0.00088210223,0.00081405876,0.000116494724,0.0005059726,0.00014193583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021599566,0.0004437226,0.006164748,0.0005431509,0.00028374456,0.0008771715,0.34486383,0.000007678218,0.14800417,0.082018584,0.03088446,0.38569275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056508677,0.0036920474,0.124120235,0.0073803854,0.0001450156,0.001596893,0.7477282,0.00092421577,0.045944504,0.024235781,0.035756644,0.0028251575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003037152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015182057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40286443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023613048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009004746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256252648","doi":"10.1598/rrq.41.2.6","title":"INTERNATIONAL REPORTS ON LITERACY RESEARCH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Classical Studies and Philology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Citation; Information literacy; Computer science; Library science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14600672942269685,"score_gpt":0.4210851960362858,"score_spread":0.2750784666135889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256252648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16190155,0.000082339604,0.0000044043327,0.01409906,0.00092065445,0.00022965575,0.000015774209,0.00007323272,0.8226733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257251,0.0000134627135,0.000018612513,0.000061043924,0.00409018,0.0000623461,0.000033059045,0.000020469875,0.06997574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694675,0.00033094568,0.00033761447,0.00043960966,0.0011890619,0.000756019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976734,0.0009647436,0.00004731003,0.00035418864,0.0008628202,0.000097568234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024498776,0.00011748842,0.0001692108,0.00047386985,0.001126761,0.00070643047,0.00028670277,0.000057945115,0.0024360346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001975611,0.00009429194,0.000081649974,0.00014539897,0.00070911023,0.00018742241,0.00007127772,0.000810539,0.0008591965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006499888,0.00023084639,0.00029786688,0.000013051272,0.000027792377,0.00030996065,0.008408752,9.725306e-7,0.00021938294,0.67042446,0.28303686,0.03696505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012426572,0.00080919673,0.0006665743,0.00005437901,0.0000013848743,0.000012683062,0.0011255683,0.00005403415,0.000028620934,0.09360016,0.90342516,0.000097998694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002765148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006043251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76382357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019787335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034831737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309651990","doi":"10.1002/rrq.489","title":"Print Learning: A Theoretical Framework for the Role of Children's Learning about the Orthography in the Development of Reading Skill","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Orthography; Reading (process); Conceptualization; Learning to read; Psychology; Linguistics; Phonics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.025062585720838994,"score_gpt":0.3681515265539288,"score_spread":0.34308894083308983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309651990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98829865,0.00069051696,0.002411315,0.0008689113,0.00017483845,0.0016021179,0.000008392269,0.000041403862,0.005903849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656886,0.000019018771,0.0017130453,0.000035171954,0.00008897216,0.0012789189,0.00001956386,0.000042451335,0.00023398008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370867,0.0027597162,0.0008309073,0.0005036006,0.0012140654,0.0009830344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006045,0.008721035,0.0002876559,0.0006790346,0.00018039728,0.00007145733],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015583317,0.00021918459,0.00034108237,0.00048255755,0.0016645856,0.00010879611,0.001369883,0.00010682149,0.00025655728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007401367,0.0001232555,0.00020639754,0.0014013341,0.00057147344,0.000051580366,0.00018179796,0.0025702012,0.00001247455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028837114,0.00024398962,0.08028365,0.000029097331,0.00019832868,0.000003746216,0.30017158,0.0001329027,0.00021433986,0.466602,0.00007936549,0.15175264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013346394,0.0029717984,0.47332236,0.00058125646,0.00006657244,0.0000930436,0.40795866,0.0011463783,0.00076277304,0.04408864,0.06706946,0.00060444017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010489402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000077690065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42251337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017404236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318022899","doi":"10.1002/rrq.493","title":"Using Dynamic Assessment to Measure Morpheme Identification and Predict Character Reading Among Chinese Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Educational and Psychological Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Psychology; Reading (process); Vocabulary; Character (mathematics); Task (project management); Word recognition; Phonological awareness; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Chinese characters; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.10756115559169273,"score_gpt":0.49198625808038915,"score_spread":0.38442510248869644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318022899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936258,0.000029395966,0.00076208916,0.0013482561,0.0006109725,0.0009030077,0.000055529606,0.00018174657,0.0024831549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941518,0.0000093026165,0.00039104378,0.000061890336,0.00033180427,0.00029008367,0.0002043021,0.00004542587,0.004514377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963322,0.000605572,0.0004552363,0.0008653238,0.0009071422,0.0008345049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827284,0.0004197213,0.000112606256,0.0005682102,0.00025078113,0.00037587204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032493537,0.00023237418,0.00026628526,0.0007533435,0.0004798065,0.00029646148,0.00040137762,0.0001692724,0.0003443085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011837197,0.00019930971,0.00006931776,0.0015504775,0.0001428586,0.00031899646,0.00006822191,0.0006262464,0.0007912832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007114357,0.000311306,0.9182756,0.00003636485,0.00020382907,0.00003513737,0.006091982,0.0000073392907,0.04175973,0.0015557198,0.0036143106,0.02803757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032601543,0.0002988224,0.9945435,0.000102205566,0.0000129352175,0.000026957343,0.0012087013,0.00095529115,0.000010077401,0.0022157442,0.000091666385,0.00020807803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034877908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017740564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076267935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022854889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006373061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323350153","doi":"10.1002/rrq.495","title":"Morphology and Reading Skills in Arabic‐Speaking Syrian Refugee Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phonological awareness; Semitic languages; Psychology; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Nonverbal communication; Context (archaeology); Vocabulary; Population; Refugee; Comprehension; Literacy; Word recognition; Learning to read; Vocabulary development; Cognition; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Arabic; Pedagogy; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03522140423601566,"score_gpt":0.3878015591099312,"score_spread":0.35258015487391553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323350153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982678,0.00015211482,0.000027469485,0.00076709717,0.0004378112,0.00054470805,0.0000110395395,0.0002676906,0.015114099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900422,0.000055600405,0.00034117213,0.00007555051,0.00026046066,0.00018550048,0.000065802335,0.00007244232,0.0089012645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951607,0.00091588096,0.0006195152,0.0010299527,0.0005859653,0.0016879595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761724,0.0011921189,0.00009758647,0.0006825484,0.0001168363,0.00029364857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049627824,0.00028240297,0.0004539212,0.0021122447,0.00034737363,0.00023031267,0.00046143355,0.0002740961,0.00023124284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034734243,0.00027172247,0.000067817295,0.0019179654,0.0002497126,0.0002649983,0.00010520229,0.0010594266,0.0020166659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022115231,0.00031510822,0.3894654,0.000092309296,0.00024568665,0.0018671773,0.10872515,0.000009369175,0.0079975985,0.018447567,0.01763377,0.45497972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017358812,0.00058816816,0.981263,0.0004622883,0.000008770319,0.0003812929,0.003902802,0.00009258644,0.00015692458,0.0033641658,0.007570819,0.00047329234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013038821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007086777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5917976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024260883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000715412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380682783","doi":"10.1002/rrq.511","title":"Is a <scp>Phone‐Based</scp> Language and Literacy Assessment a Reliable and Valid Measure of Children's Reading Skills in <scp>Low‐Resource</scp> Settings?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jacobs Foundation","keywords":"Pseudoword; Phone; Vocabulary; Literacy; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Phonemic awareness; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Applied psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.021775862292391663,"score_gpt":0.35977684008842187,"score_spread":0.3380009777960302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380682783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97971994,0.0002934001,0.000022481692,0.0010017864,0.00004710353,0.0006412152,0.000031769738,0.00023981785,0.018002464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950369,0.00013944543,0.00071545586,0.000093490984,0.00008973626,0.000055984736,0.00004294025,0.000038898874,0.0037871762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601704,0.00033719145,0.000476925,0.00069880596,0.0012656045,0.001204423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962196,0.0027439082,0.00015644402,0.00037417337,0.00021276057,0.00029314958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049678055,0.00024033435,0.00044438854,0.0013243485,0.0005390322,0.00052238355,0.00043917893,0.00029084907,0.000009124606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023578415,0.00024217056,0.00007520556,0.0024864473,0.00053883885,0.00053692656,0.00016255245,0.00068855245,0.0000410937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014115932,0.00037654568,0.4786177,0.00044657936,0.00014017943,0.00026662243,0.3633033,0.0000048995594,0.006860622,0.0075876107,0.05882035,0.083561465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006226698,0.002184564,0.5499816,0.005960045,0.000067740286,0.000060609225,0.3283812,0.0015307451,0.016508304,0.019673083,0.068729565,0.00069580966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010157181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014941956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082865655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016551022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035592177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98754287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382698962","doi":"10.1002/rrq.514","title":"The Role of Executive Functions in Lexical Processing During Reading Comprehension","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Hong Kong Institute of Education","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Linguistics","score_opus":0.04910099844491945,"score_gpt":0.3919039135500191,"score_spread":0.34280291510509964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382698962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741027,0.00031342433,0.000033112465,0.0003196455,0.00023225794,0.00031924548,0.000004247277,0.00013141046,0.024543954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893264,0.00001772304,0.000045085268,0.0000040940126,0.000101503756,0.00014350712,0.000013585536,0.00003116669,0.010316925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970082,0.00054938305,0.00050851615,0.00039364127,0.00058990717,0.0009503736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979579,0.0012094999,0.00009110931,0.00040448754,0.00021139698,0.0001256112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024226848,0.00014919636,0.00023973359,0.0007830511,0.00073529425,0.00013418519,0.00032725162,0.00011683424,0.000034476783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014870375,0.00011581254,0.00006735838,0.0018359065,0.0002364056,0.00016156328,0.00006361534,0.00069267175,0.00045417572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010121532,0.00037548476,0.0783855,0.0002126115,0.00015358937,0.00023716703,0.19935562,0.00004495374,0.11030627,0.018318487,0.005878727,0.5857194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021690654,0.0011511954,0.6570145,0.0021650672,0.000018657745,0.00013260414,0.27403146,0.004049904,0.0052727973,0.015173808,0.038103268,0.00071766775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038804425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030962598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58500177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018157555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092106166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58376616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385837972","doi":"10.1002/rrq.519","title":"Do Teacher Reports of Executive Functions Predict Reading Development? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; York University; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Psychology; Executive functions; Reading (process); Literacy; Working memory; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11709167872033495,"score_gpt":0.4305286049256269,"score_spread":0.31343692620529195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385837972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97703576,0.00023443217,0.002926256,0.0004008267,0.00082768133,0.0007806664,0.00008894791,0.00033936018,0.017366068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95980203,0.000019775567,0.0028587885,0.000012869743,0.00024691303,0.000563139,0.00035209855,0.000058124624,0.036086246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437463,0.0010219812,0.0010763636,0.0010325483,0.0015416525,0.00095282716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912254,0.006410305,0.00034498775,0.0009158031,0.00083149254,0.00027199558],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058906516,0.00027299614,0.00042947274,0.0012603494,0.0005188871,0.00017762587,0.00043178312,0.0001929431,0.0011632531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003078404,0.0002632726,0.00012268277,0.0021225777,0.00026205726,0.00048130812,0.00011842557,0.00071289326,0.0008515089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005193273,0.00039869544,0.25731447,0.000093962764,0.0011576187,0.00070193864,0.44864064,0.000024194784,0.009987313,0.0015446772,0.21313487,0.066482306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010908719,0.0010871893,0.84783787,0.0030529446,0.000066045366,0.00012205492,0.09474178,0.00030293936,0.0029155905,0.013048104,0.03478662,0.00094800175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028110088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045414366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5905234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041180415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000512324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389340235","doi":"10.1002/rrq.525","title":"“Back Then it was Only Men Who Worked in These Kinds of Fields”: Observing Little Sparks Through the Prism of Affect and Gender in Maker Literacies Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Queer; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Queer theory; Pedagogy; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.19997920287353085,"score_gpt":0.4394811029312312,"score_spread":0.23950190005770036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389340235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763249,0.00013173293,0.00084706594,0.006610951,0.000069192225,0.0006467658,0.0000020369437,0.000039083094,0.01532828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685097,0.000059947633,0.00066961464,0.000032119417,0.000036094778,0.000068804686,0.0000022592617,0.000017328588,0.0022628773],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955346,0.0014842437,0.0005264623,0.00053010316,0.0010972868,0.0008273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951472,0.0032206953,0.00011965384,0.0009605,0.00051659805,0.000035300818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009266867,0.000157,0.00032638735,0.0013134048,0.00015788141,0.00019259982,0.0013496355,0.0002188481,0.000026510686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007976559,0.00011716736,0.000048551556,0.0040866598,0.0005439728,0.0007946539,0.0005281195,0.0016070311,0.00005163846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028523896,0.00033132953,0.026229396,0.0006613416,0.00014725458,0.00018430961,0.7037814,0.000046498106,0.029829599,0.15591769,0.02086954,0.061716363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024528042,0.0037909173,0.32887238,0.0046133557,0.00000917874,0.00008221545,0.061072275,0.07805665,0.025095167,0.489268,0.0058539533,0.0008331005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007669482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031522094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64270914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018405767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015849053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69818395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392788228","doi":"10.1002/rrq.528","title":"Reifying, Disorienting and Restoring Gender Binaries in Dialogic Literature Discussions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Gender Studies in Language","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Azrieli Foundation; Israel Science Foundation; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Dialogic; Silence; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Literacy; Gender studies; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12168932809885237,"score_gpt":0.46481821048677696,"score_spread":0.3431288823879246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392788228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88563573,0.022001993,0.00011428281,0.0050298837,0.001460466,0.0006354147,0.000014659773,0.00035768183,0.0847499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449456,0.00054581265,0.0002550026,0.000008799501,0.00046785962,0.000058458918,0.0000037838804,0.000020311545,0.00414542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969777,0.0006936895,0.00020766277,0.00049819826,0.00075715285,0.00086559966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986107,0.0008842455,0.000019410167,0.00024264868,0.00008325348,0.00015974932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040182117,0.00012594638,0.0001613398,0.00051686895,0.0012796491,0.0010169896,0.00025839693,0.00012628513,0.00002807918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011417684,0.000098696815,0.000046066853,0.0014668229,0.00050817564,0.0004849085,0.000119821234,0.00082300766,0.000026207243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008344015,0.00002716846,0.011677139,0.00020939975,0.00002196853,0.00040793195,0.80073315,5.802614e-7,0.0008501184,0.1428553,0.0014372715,0.041771617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046295763,0.0004697793,0.027842108,0.003144946,0.000024614066,0.000024487721,0.7346801,0.0003543158,0.00006954568,0.14737923,0.08471152,0.0008363797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009953795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001407356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10885883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027176712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011069675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396901753","doi":"10.1002/rrq.538","title":"Contributions of Reading Support from Teachers, Parents, and Friends to Reading Related Variables in Academic and Recreational Contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Recreation; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Biology","score_opus":0.07383486017229697,"score_gpt":0.44881974630550664,"score_spread":0.3749848861332097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396901753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898722,0.00087293267,0.00011621575,0.0022191731,0.0002724141,0.00051768206,0.00017891554,0.000072219074,0.005878236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773157,0.0005336846,0.00024032826,0.000016917887,0.00013966567,0.00008344412,0.00019252904,0.000016581665,0.0010452889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709535,0.00067031546,0.0004777409,0.00048884394,0.0006929947,0.00057473144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997416,0.0018987055,0.00006605173,0.00015794471,0.00015379186,0.00030748636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004679009,0.00012739237,0.00023535117,0.0006584541,0.00040463445,0.00021990828,0.00021724275,0.00022826358,0.000111927824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011345518,0.00013709029,0.000029327128,0.0010406391,0.00038445307,0.0006387435,0.00004854617,0.0006564261,0.000025238829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006715146,0.00016065048,0.22162874,0.00008869075,0.00015702302,0.000025558822,0.38265857,0.0000034341738,0.11176528,0.24390244,0.004550069,0.034992393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022256414,0.0017364984,0.31973052,0.010583988,0.0002012442,0.000017567374,0.34149855,0.0020584273,0.010922925,0.27526906,0.03432294,0.0014326206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015457988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064982974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10084236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057993433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043989602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99109817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399295798","doi":"10.1002/rrq.553","title":"Is There a Genetic Confound in the Relation of Home Literacy Environment with Children's Reading Skills? A Familial Control Method Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Literacy; Family literacy; Psychology; Relation (database); Developmental psychology; Emergent literacy; Pedagogy; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023763604949736967,"score_gpt":0.35066006025208935,"score_spread":0.3268964553023524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399295798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96516734,0.0006586039,0.009479068,0.0015582625,0.00004387597,0.0011711621,0.00001628983,0.0000787109,0.021826664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966794,0.00010143003,0.0023692509,0.000031354415,0.00008796964,0.00007551213,0.000009630062,0.000016335127,0.0006290979],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722385,0.0006524095,0.00029139256,0.00040016783,0.0009362518,0.00049591763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984877,0.0010628888,0.000052825242,0.00027905704,0.000054691103,0.00006284682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003021382,0.0001291204,0.00021136155,0.00043640198,0.00025672754,0.0003633961,0.00041642511,0.00014069451,0.00003624714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008547366,0.00008824985,0.000060561786,0.00083902315,0.0004234152,0.00033819553,0.000021750518,0.0004871184,0.000038789814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001736817,0.00043801343,0.096605904,0.000132273,0.00023539012,0.000103214814,0.3820422,0.000028282218,0.00069631566,0.17164509,0.00047532353,0.3474243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024982144,0.002145104,0.87076455,0.00085615605,0.00006741891,0.00008706234,0.03859482,0.0038927041,0.00013606872,0.067307964,0.0128970845,0.00075287756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009323914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005224659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7741586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015482231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019012654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35987246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401625826","doi":"10.1002/rrq.571","title":"White Christian Nationalism, Biblical Proof Texting, and Literacy Curriculum and Instruction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Sociology; Literacy; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Politics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.03352049176938976,"score_gpt":0.42786780910855915,"score_spread":0.3943473173391694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401625826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674677,0.0015952898,0.00007979326,0.010164365,0.0003227414,0.0003212254,0.000004528926,0.00011404083,0.019930309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949977,0.00039798295,0.0002409796,0.000033114942,0.0005741201,0.0000399814,0.000006921747,0.000010667494,0.003698551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.00035099452,0.00016921037,0.00032335398,0.0006569754,0.00034327558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990485,0.00026832052,0.000022311466,0.000099662284,0.0002952449,0.00026601733],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021174746,0.000075584845,0.00008964745,0.0008119747,0.00070606516,0.0017479287,0.0001108597,0.000088564775,0.000104385304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037598013,0.000068195885,0.000024657194,0.0013993795,0.00031098103,0.00035374064,0.0000167488,0.00037216162,0.000053553063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009465514,0.000037788985,0.035673503,0.00018674179,0.000028720337,0.000021338798,0.13724823,2.7061867e-7,0.00020790337,0.2626466,0.09907424,0.4648652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008072346,0.0008687342,0.077514604,0.0015126709,0.000027596485,0.00015078357,0.06616689,0.0063159363,0.00006108322,0.26398638,0.58176816,0.0008199291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010409927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000088038825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48269394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010978413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026880522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404326145","doi":"10.1002/rrq.585","title":"“They're Like Slash”: Multimodality and Embodied Agency in Students' Critical Engagements with Texts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Slash (logging); Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Critical reading; Sociology; Pedagogy; Reading (process); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08566863975611476,"score_gpt":0.41020036177375974,"score_spread":0.32453172201764496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404326145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893252,0.0004038633,0.000012062545,0.00074432435,0.0006931442,0.00036533523,0.000018598572,0.00008008334,0.0083573405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945947,0.00003402851,0.00007041304,0.000052034917,0.000668514,0.000109423774,0.000020433044,0.000027020076,0.0044234125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760044,0.0003950081,0.00026001138,0.00043601947,0.0007336953,0.00057484093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985011,0.0008916141,0.000015164815,0.00024387012,0.00017059821,0.00017765774],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020419792,0.00014995509,0.00017458906,0.00041615835,0.0004028604,0.0014096295,0.00021574865,0.000050345774,0.0005018825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001634278,0.00011607646,0.00003105583,0.000110365836,0.00029254094,0.00066414877,0.000034506367,0.0006045252,0.00021213791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004902634,0.00026882184,0.008463138,0.00048839895,0.000040859402,0.00010455833,0.94214636,1.3647423e-7,0.000020354026,0.017714126,0.0024623442,0.028241877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023319323,0.0038151133,0.099660315,0.0048320494,0.00009978669,0.00002248787,0.7617474,0.002126361,0.000056236,0.05898681,0.0650524,0.0012691073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015277972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022908654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18039896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012162979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012721602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405204758","doi":"10.1002/rrq.597","title":"Critically Engaged Language and Literacy Workshops as a Disruptive Pedagogy in Plurilingual Classrooms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Literacy; Pedagogy; Psychology; Teaching method; Phonemic awareness; Sociology","score_opus":0.08745869982686293,"score_gpt":0.579388888933002,"score_spread":0.49193018910613906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405204758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93948156,0.0012575085,0.000029047122,0.0069176,0.00027890975,0.00032030648,0.000007992087,0.00012244536,0.051584665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98040783,0.00012113548,0.00016385512,0.00015169023,0.0008077963,0.00004247031,0.000007014024,0.000021259691,0.018276945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957577,0.002212138,0.00024754778,0.00041609802,0.0005948664,0.00077163253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400175,0.005216312,0.000014868561,0.00018016018,0.00022334066,0.00036359034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067519,0.000118730175,0.00016404211,0.0005902253,0.0006478163,0.0008808703,0.00022241361,0.00014605222,0.00053437107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006394258,0.00011503299,0.00004853519,0.00086560333,0.00048053876,0.00037956567,0.000028146334,0.0016010203,0.00030210093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020432171,0.00004378216,0.00020642718,0.000047488582,0.0000067133888,0.0001327653,0.6594361,9.778402e-8,0.00031936806,0.048823558,0.00020714097,0.2907561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034135496,0.00036735574,0.0024109567,0.00066283415,0.000007813773,0.000016948967,0.86178327,0.0008967649,0.00006203033,0.011247265,0.12189875,0.0003046835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010527303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035456908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2904514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023282522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010710462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405653019","doi":"10.1002/rrq.601","title":"Writing in Creole Contexts: A Study of Jamaican Primary School Students","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Clarendon Fund; University of Oxford","keywords":"Creole language; Psychology; Primary education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12991156025072995,"score_gpt":0.5877195127283936,"score_spread":0.4578079524776637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405653019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97580004,0.0003462258,0.0000016778489,0.0013733952,0.00015617794,0.000622079,0.0000036689482,0.000055305358,0.021641409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471736,0.00004493765,0.000023789502,0.00003030912,0.0003130217,0.00006384102,0.0000015013961,0.000013323849,0.0047919103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996603,0.0010699008,0.0003616382,0.00028285867,0.0011883435,0.0004942351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983085,0.0010416448,0.000033233868,0.0002018968,0.0001879338,0.00022680873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005942001,0.00007748705,0.00017617582,0.0006370078,0.00025218452,0.00037625933,0.00045457878,0.00006142173,0.00017040002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000728785,0.00007695318,0.000037652615,0.0011321735,0.00017955342,0.00023542048,0.000034313474,0.0005006542,0.00013417423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003859656,0.0011162248,0.08136137,0.00017493458,0.00004015129,0.000051890645,0.72399324,7.815029e-7,0.00086523977,0.006343708,0.0018255162,0.18418832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011975792,0.0016403437,0.113840975,0.001505119,0.000011225812,0.0000012958006,0.8500059,0.00010816702,0.000078863064,0.0022761463,0.029052218,0.0002821241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022185769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042453855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1839062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039838467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087609526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409242827","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70007","title":"Getting at How: Testing Mediating Factors in the Relation Between Morphological Awareness and Reading Comprehension in Grade 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Comprehension; Relation (database); Reading (process); Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15003632649262558,"score_gpt":0.4205855967029053,"score_spread":0.27054927021027975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409242827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99488384,0.00013202288,0.00012188979,0.0013146547,0.0001649762,0.000480324,0.0000038956873,0.00006420164,0.0028342092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986984,0.000005127604,0.00055532577,0.0000427415,0.00008906346,0.000084088635,0.000048913796,0.0000195705,0.0004567265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546605,0.0018329838,0.0005704568,0.0006852329,0.0005599756,0.0008852814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888272,0.010502194,0.0001247755,0.00036147857,0.00009437005,0.000089969304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005553878,0.0002254348,0.00037186066,0.0009673552,0.000624604,0.00023492804,0.00035987515,0.00023852328,0.000010027671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013344272,0.00016883704,0.000039032464,0.0015778075,0.00015468351,0.00020847039,0.00010522703,0.0011883106,0.000014530544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019891117,0.000045695353,0.9370866,0.00004969935,0.00001282784,0.00011723391,0.033174988,0.0000067786086,0.005928533,0.0006862006,0.00019002179,0.022681536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053345313,0.0001585552,0.9842803,0.00055919704,0.000006123058,0.000021922835,0.011744594,0.0006993386,0.00013273762,0.0014211083,0.0002675044,0.00017516909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013248136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007117238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047193702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000400244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005824355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6884975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411006431","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70018","title":"“There's nothing to read here…the newspaper is <i>cho cá</i>, for the fish!”: A Young Refugee‐Background Child Brokering Languages, Literacies, and Cultures as a Caring Multiliterate Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Newspaper; Nothing; Refugee; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Media studies; Political science; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0666451196676964,"score_gpt":0.5293804867145967,"score_spread":0.4627353670469003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411006431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4201728,0.0059009986,0.00033721238,0.35828373,0.001193442,0.005744977,0.00010408863,0.00028778907,0.20797494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89832187,0.0004886657,0.0010534463,0.013297941,0.0013089835,0.00059489824,0.0000129609025,0.000047499783,0.08487372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697065,0.0006943364,0.00033154077,0.0005122605,0.000651383,0.0008398223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485135,0.0037096902,0.000094676274,0.00053455424,0.0005697865,0.00023992773],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043122387,0.00020010195,0.00020449678,0.00020233398,0.003392486,0.0023985845,0.00066197506,0.00013773625,0.00006355057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037031574,0.00013770603,0.000090984526,0.0008676079,0.0003786683,0.0006113563,0.00008995232,0.0007252063,0.000041541676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001550175,0.00005794325,0.00028724025,0.00010493685,0.00010104683,0.00000670654,0.81234044,0.0000044704293,0.0005517053,0.02014432,0.011287082,0.15495908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002327371,0.00006772471,0.0005834761,0.0003139246,0.000021436283,0.000008791646,0.21853913,0.00016646169,0.00011925163,0.00019612873,0.7796182,0.00013270156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07120849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011724188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76833117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027432005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003689875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414077636","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70126","title":"Refugee Displacement and Migration Impact Cross-Linguistic Transfer Between Arabic and English: Insights from Syrian Refugees","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Refugee; Displacement (psychology); Context (archaeology); Syrian refugees; Arabic; Reading (process); Forced migration; Literacy","score_opus":0.028342557014300954,"score_gpt":0.4380148088425704,"score_spread":0.40967225182826944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414077636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940639,0.0012459736,0.000061396066,0.0010011103,0.0003124689,0.00030360298,0.000018773575,0.00004974833,0.002943023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754596,0.0003375485,0.00004233329,0.00002909096,0.00054479257,0.000034777462,0.000028608081,0.000008831432,0.0014280515],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978865,0.00040763852,0.00028955596,0.0004271353,0.0005259276,0.00046326203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984917,0.0006986299,0.000029371962,0.0001992216,0.00029934561,0.0002817449],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010449849,0.00014783318,0.00022874569,0.0003038364,0.0014097353,0.0008539028,0.00021567938,0.00014785935,0.00004381328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000534372,0.000111970534,0.000053752232,0.00043178012,0.00079404225,0.00035839374,0.000017841223,0.00029587647,0.000007476403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001776672,0.00017966989,0.239879,0.00010884785,0.00019937832,0.000009232248,0.60924876,0.0000014859302,0.002556349,0.066795394,0.0010752559,0.079768956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014442318,0.001127937,0.5035913,0.00082201464,0.00006698061,5.623419e-7,0.09502155,0.00011989906,0.0008050725,0.023271477,0.37309664,0.00063229835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00923535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060692444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5142272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014227348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025733185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415187127","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70069","title":"The Linguistic Pathways Model: Capturing the Multiple Dimensions of Reading Development","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Comprehension; Sentence; Parsing; Construct (python library); Syntax","score_opus":0.06804229341920819,"score_gpt":0.37897391997708324,"score_spread":0.31093162655787504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415187127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91191196,0.0015588223,0.006162726,0.001821842,0.001866097,0.0014799157,0.000014886912,0.00023628233,0.07494748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98048866,0.000029044459,0.0012191808,0.00004888413,0.000082880746,0.00027030043,0.00000835056,0.000032282565,0.017820437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964846,0.0005710239,0.000679799,0.00052002,0.0007105932,0.0010339653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367833,0.004593091,0.00013564924,0.0009870927,0.00047296466,0.00013287853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048040277,0.00023005359,0.00028777317,0.00039473787,0.0018005028,0.00020236202,0.00086291303,0.00012174106,0.000015978783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010406688,0.0001257664,0.00010376412,0.0007482266,0.0003352704,0.000059198508,0.00013789501,0.000817101,0.00012407558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047253742,0.0004541857,0.009474223,0.00024434246,0.00094365975,0.00010275786,0.34597847,0.00052750245,0.012302807,0.24370222,0.028243668,0.35755363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00527394,0.0012892358,0.053104732,0.006017337,0.00020007222,0.0001046818,0.10055579,0.08467245,0.020770501,0.07189505,0.6537679,0.0023483369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031814337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070038775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6255242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027407866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045134907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415557608","doi":"10.1002/rrq.70041","title":"“Book Boundaries” in West Michigan School Board Election Campaigns: Examining White Christian Nationalist Visions of Dominion Over Literacy Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading Research Quarterly","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Michigan State University","keywords":"Rhetoric; Censorship; Dominion; Literacy; White (mutation); Vision; Politics; Nationalism","score_opus":0.023646944610520918,"score_gpt":0.4263683736511291,"score_spread":0.4027214290406082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415557608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248733,0.0018304773,0.00027777933,0.006224005,0.0012231495,0.0009916077,0.000009422658,0.00007633688,0.06449392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771152,0.00023392886,0.0002890382,0.00035976127,0.00030825098,0.00013615601,0.00004601711,0.000013778503,0.021497881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968412,0.00084581424,0.00053303887,0.00039675302,0.0008811355,0.0005020677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978282,0.0006245048,0.00014178887,0.00031434867,0.00087194593,0.0002192157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031939181,0.00012939071,0.0002178121,0.0013613623,0.0011977326,0.000976584,0.00035089446,0.00016289794,0.0005322204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017883901,0.00014095764,0.000061076644,0.0020662851,0.00040150207,0.00050708,0.000021177928,0.0005512593,0.00007636342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002032515,0.0005793878,0.15494187,0.000194144,0.00006057853,0.0000036193242,0.20669317,0.000008302091,0.0051475912,0.099342376,0.48446274,0.048362948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012527861,0.00055482617,0.4329135,0.0024383205,0.000022621289,0.0000029009686,0.103759125,0.00024752293,0.00036536218,0.042744055,0.41516608,0.0005328916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008531422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030993994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27797163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072210334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}