{"meta":{"query_hash":"25d0cca1d330","filters":{"venue":"Reference Services Review"},"cohort_total":59,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":59,"exported":59,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/25d0cca1d330","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Reference+Services+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1576095053","doi":"10.1108/00907321011070900","title":"Patents under the microscope","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Inclusion (mineral); Value (mathematics); Scientific literacy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Literacy; Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Science education; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.1284216255156498,"score_gpt":0.263784894839518,"score_spread":0.1353632693238682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576095053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009822665,0.018847447,0.009828441,0.029884716,0.0024996249,0.00022313104,0.00084727624,0.0005605498,0.92748606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4336559,0.048916765,0.030981338,0.022208346,0.00550275,0.00058062753,0.0013914871,0.00045105186,0.4563118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949663,0.0010021029,0.00022161212,0.0004943849,0.0028952407,0.00042040076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928156,0.001806115,0.00093045476,0.001074592,0.0028956325,0.00047757415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003841582,0.0002937406,0.0003734373,0.0037635716,0.0020339505,0.004519593,0.0010876086,0.0016142726,0.064620584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017135166,0.00018268597,0.00044818487,0.0032444503,0.0030393505,0.0041885837,0.0021939299,0.0016859889,0.018254302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007526027,0.000027601318,0.0036095988,0.0008232884,0.000020093412,0.0011563475,0.0011785949,0.00017237733,0.0033099651,0.26063868,0.17724404,0.5517441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009114264,0.0000356714,0.0025694878,0.00038427414,0.000011260035,0.0010607131,0.0006547287,0.000112990456,0.0015978651,0.019898174,0.97365063,0.000015087708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009390164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009307827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064620584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028208687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007785975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2161774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582617615","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2014-0052","title":"Situating information literacy in the disciplines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Discipline; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Literacy; Critical literacy; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.059673012099428345,"score_gpt":0.3852315745808768,"score_spread":0.3255585624814485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582617615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37771964,0.09788539,0.053539366,0.10239898,0.0013905622,0.0005902314,0.00007456556,0.00020658458,0.3661947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476342,0.020540178,0.017976372,0.006381736,0.00020351328,0.00022670033,0.00004646506,0.000041446547,0.0069492934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968777,0.024493288,0.0015830827,0.0011140695,0.003124038,0.00090846303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94581574,0.04136897,0.0041428725,0.002334207,0.0050328076,0.0013054339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026565855,0.00028303938,0.00086870545,0.0063267387,0.0059734182,0.014109633,0.0016106287,0.002641654,0.0040023667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05451435,0.0003358177,0.00038036576,0.007817057,0.01802179,0.016469797,0.012130502,0.0026459806,0.00046209278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050864746,0.00012012611,0.010553432,0.0027611519,0.000034608594,0.0008594496,0.5575107,0.00019708245,0.0014947805,0.18374383,0.0035025806,0.23917152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018914994,0.00014943931,0.008467473,0.008731654,0.00005619527,0.0012742144,0.59518653,0.00022438848,0.0015929441,0.102427565,0.28182903,0.000041654657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057482924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007923906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026565855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007081952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020474158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1404953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600447983","doi":"10.1108/00907320810873039","title":"Incorporating information literacy into the building plan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Benchmarking; Plan (archaeology); Institution; Literacy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Public relations; Library science; Pedagogy; Political science; Business; Marketing; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.04652284662532909,"score_gpt":0.33435715305836167,"score_spread":0.2878343064330326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600447983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13666011,0.0030439517,0.21873215,0.009899494,0.00022395099,0.0028133315,0.00033921923,0.00092570414,0.62736213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69034404,0.0023895958,0.28408965,0.00048522407,0.000038745948,0.0008967777,0.00022675625,0.00006978656,0.021459473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971378,0.0018020195,0.00016647075,0.00013655146,0.00054206117,0.00021518298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.0017220788,0.00040189415,0.00043498306,0.0008045,0.00027536918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948852,0.00031920968,0.00019891722,0.0017911412,0.0015852351,0.0040114764,0.0010373569,0.0006297811,0.008765866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077105323,0.00037555618,0.00033340114,0.0019868936,0.0020418484,0.0033222511,0.0023203793,0.00082353444,0.0011162551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009220928,0.00034102486,0.017686972,0.0019421203,0.000039008395,0.0007131114,0.019136265,0.019757647,0.0023857367,0.2293218,0.015158827,0.6934252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085055486,0.0008466513,0.02955667,0.0033244675,0.00015917378,0.0011379647,0.047165494,0.012042634,0.005997327,0.092924,0.80663824,0.00012227448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010554133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025994046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010554133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034594908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109638935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02932477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604883256","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774292","title":"Getting everyone on the same page","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Interview; Originality; Process (computing); Medical education; Library science; Public relations; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Qualitative research; Medicine; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.030671134817659065,"score_gpt":0.26628150010799323,"score_spread":0.23561036529033416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604883256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08413186,0.021642324,0.07253356,0.0643638,0.016341886,0.0077386815,0.0015419435,0.008366349,0.7233395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34349895,0.01782701,0.06395228,0.03521373,0.0078441845,0.0072424626,0.0013719577,0.0021435134,0.5209059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925452,0.0038021386,0.0004456082,0.00074279046,0.0018026216,0.0006616828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837171,0.0033097658,0.0013901257,0.0031202738,0.0056363973,0.0028264632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065156743,0.0006392895,0.00065029785,0.0017938406,0.003711958,0.00513868,0.0012476839,0.0018638392,0.13883531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022737557,0.0003317388,0.00062850385,0.0016881236,0.0013520765,0.008678513,0.005881105,0.0014395932,0.074290246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019698206,0.00023974945,0.0035362593,0.0028176408,0.0000301097,0.00040248316,0.020035207,0.00006626374,0.0072151762,0.0054668975,0.32402068,0.6359725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038288043,0.00043036355,0.0037165508,0.0013799419,0.000044241242,0.0006170426,0.013565859,0.00008018154,0.002333237,0.0019683861,0.97579044,0.000035414803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021846634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020274962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13883531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007227854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020458389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46445036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970746207","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2014-0027","title":"Access to translated fiction in Canadian public libraries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cataloging; Originality; Subject access; Promotion (chess); Subject (documents); Computer science; Collection development; World Wide Web; Public access; Library science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Set (abstract data type); Relevance (law); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.11809283249219052,"score_gpt":0.31188419481973745,"score_spread":0.19379136232754693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970746207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85389966,0.03427152,0.0008085156,0.007346483,0.00022172366,0.00028791282,0.006786954,0.00017998902,0.09619719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697702,0.01331823,0.0009018959,0.0006364582,0.00005981027,0.00006461613,0.0023624694,0.000047134665,0.012839257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919688,0.00080048,0.0004005793,0.00054116483,0.005073665,0.0012152208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561925,0.0073228073,0.005815029,0.0016437488,0.026648859,0.0023770002],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006084771,0.0003251784,0.0007317275,0.017902952,0.0083472645,0.00771228,0.002114894,0.00064307643,0.008759806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342211,0.00030506204,0.0003775762,0.04454684,0.0039764,0.0027040257,0.003275946,0.0007410873,0.00063457893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065470167,0.00012324401,0.1760437,0.0053595984,0.00015111367,0.0023125196,0.17862482,0.0005433742,0.0012898929,0.01416438,0.035712242,0.5850204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029468938,0.0001288661,0.6631335,0.002450216,0.0001962597,0.00087447965,0.08511047,0.00031383362,0.001372785,0.0006200906,0.24559894,0.00017110616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06549242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14174418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.475183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971203752","doi":"10.1108/00907321011044990","title":"The mobile university: from the library to the campus","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobile device; Originality; Mobile business development; Mobile technology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Academic library; Library science; Multimedia; Mobile Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.00839920895512247,"score_gpt":0.23787034729149995,"score_spread":0.22947113833637747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971203752","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07754379,0.50993264,0.0059117596,0.0817873,0.0034772488,0.00023693166,0.00016287073,0.00038181894,0.32056564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49666604,0.36730415,0.004860738,0.018145777,0.00286101,0.00022411312,0.00013145166,0.00012425953,0.10968249],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966036,0.0019341535,0.00020673372,0.000159813,0.0007533853,0.00034230435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963811,0.001020726,0.00040252344,0.00016558944,0.001313406,0.0007166598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021376733,0.00021337485,0.0003637891,0.0019179408,0.0026530873,0.010581012,0.0008831334,0.0014612386,0.011018927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005571576,0.00015127457,0.00023666889,0.003845051,0.0019460919,0.0062134378,0.0035801136,0.0012603338,0.0039460873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011114516,0.0000848977,0.0037081544,0.0043342444,0.00003151017,0.0010893967,0.019921416,0.00025661517,0.0013385331,0.03824104,0.09290832,0.8379747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050157114,0.00010770689,0.0030727524,0.0018079962,0.000034586268,0.00077855296,0.021710942,0.000043956854,0.0006081845,0.0007991302,0.9710142,0.000017042597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012220899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019665983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012220899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004997727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010464632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036862016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987813876","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920342","title":"Building an information literacy first‐person shooter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Information literacy; Video game; Computer science; Literacy; Multimedia; Game design; Game Developer; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06342967326573867,"score_gpt":0.3724710295083506,"score_spread":0.3090413562426119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987813876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77944994,0.0013051505,0.093690746,0.001651224,0.00021850121,0.003070444,0.00014554417,0.0016750265,0.11879339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466592,0.0014237714,0.21261863,0.000626535,0.000032394608,0.00089763897,0.0002523612,0.00012465847,0.03736478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991696,0.00035993312,0.00005133316,0.00009260974,0.0002215636,0.00010499093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980252,0.0008939317,0.00015571612,0.00022718051,0.0004060314,0.00029192376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016191879,0.00045467488,0.000417066,0.00071519124,0.00052088604,0.0016507996,0.0009384655,0.00050426525,0.0077352854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005251005,0.00026114227,0.00041909562,0.00022115666,0.00042579183,0.0017220188,0.0016036121,0.0005787792,0.0020103718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005951957,0.0040358906,0.020605225,0.0017503311,0.00007980261,0.0010828709,0.0073183198,0.0024989883,0.022195406,0.010139133,0.010559302,0.91913944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009885953,0.020367656,0.10008238,0.003436814,0.00054111844,0.008999234,0.025361704,0.032180484,0.09869428,0.017292807,0.6917749,0.0002800694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017289148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00325242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077352854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007446738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014816865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025877118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988333947","doi":"10.1108/rsr.2010.24038daa.001","title":"Destination Calgary, Destination RSR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.009801382595127283,"score_gpt":0.23292370876638002,"score_spread":0.22312232617125274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988333947","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002524372,0.6584582,0.0004183788,0.018702958,0.0151834,0.00013472674,0.003959867,0.00025397865,0.30036414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008579386,0.57071006,0.0005679113,0.0042964118,0.0013273234,0.0000687261,0.0041209143,0.000075597345,0.41025367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999288,0.000057809528,0.000041219835,0.00006871719,0.00041440627,0.00012982111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977835,0.00010776702,0.000111236695,0.0000550754,0.0017906807,0.00015182578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010778963,0.00074156414,0.00083117845,0.004944538,0.0021518674,0.0033995225,0.0018879207,0.001564759,0.06303262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002376068,0.00033367457,0.00043105276,0.0110574,0.0007267018,0.0017631492,0.0012753007,0.0018596903,0.01522895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032070922,0.000015652897,0.0004736628,0.0010584873,0.000009656649,0.00006429872,0.000086121894,0.000063968444,0.00007422338,0.0014558847,0.81848437,0.17818148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057807565,0.000008108728,0.0018951118,0.0006288209,0.000013842486,0.000027196933,0.00015686857,0.0000102550475,0.000043719017,0.000067362045,0.99713933,0.000003551632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.510716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6733803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48928398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007738741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02455711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98433095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992171206","doi":"10.1108/00907321111108169","title":"The librarian's role in combating plagiarism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Tracking (education); Value (mathematics); Plagiarism detection; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Work (physics); Medical education; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04872931401283874,"score_gpt":0.30351276508528446,"score_spread":0.2547834510724457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992171206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53196186,0.029679934,0.027891237,0.08447379,0.00093939336,0.00058259966,0.00028324127,0.0021741234,0.32201388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516534,0.0056099347,0.014035461,0.010308266,0.0003672978,0.00014968465,0.00010473808,0.00017187982,0.017599206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91191673,0.062767014,0.006712019,0.0022243164,0.013514243,0.0028656772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78472006,0.12519126,0.023753587,0.009163655,0.040673587,0.016497899],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04547182,0.000255066,0.0007982879,0.0063501825,0.008642609,0.016895426,0.001676422,0.001952887,0.009543047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12822056,0.0004206835,0.00043539374,0.0064609977,0.0037904868,0.009454519,0.006812412,0.0015331724,0.004008029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032822977,0.00071231264,0.23534618,0.0024444782,0.00023536301,0.0012163842,0.090805195,0.00024036944,0.0021849703,0.01907111,0.038452197,0.60896325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010068463,0.0011738134,0.22631715,0.0027445932,0.00030926804,0.005851133,0.18164928,0.00069358427,0.0049504265,0.009411391,0.56659317,0.00020554337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026848337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038870345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048998366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014501664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24048084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997922661","doi":"10.1108/00907320410553731","title":"Canadian guide to gaming industry resources","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Information industry; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.08696082213711057,"score_gpt":0.4209368863543013,"score_spread":0.3339760642171907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997922661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006967454,0.029512893,0.0022671456,0.012821766,0.0017946985,0.0005279832,0.025616217,0.001228346,0.9255342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041034413,0.036926452,0.00654802,0.0042708204,0.00020593248,0.000284073,0.012929631,0.00035096888,0.9343806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983942,0.000077096505,0.00007072857,0.00007684444,0.0011727026,0.00020849357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521196,0.00023354948,0.00007632438,0.00010794538,0.0038496566,0.00052055484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105668,0.00090915215,0.0006660063,0.008070034,0.004629947,0.0038188796,0.0017969257,0.0016584868,0.22694038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004377762,0.0006001413,0.00044542557,0.013238161,0.00074789504,0.0019912159,0.0012827892,0.0017359665,0.074487135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003879072,0.0000094923635,0.00013506155,0.00010595422,0.0000011536814,0.000029129658,0.00011244465,0.000042306354,0.000042036612,0.0038546342,0.93784,0.05782395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012607258,0.0000015815231,0.00043218958,0.00009838826,0.0000010983354,0.00001994151,0.000066702916,0.000018775614,0.000010855638,0.00023426955,0.9991099,0.000004998727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91099524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22694038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02090236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08161067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7591912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004595673","doi":"10.1108/rsr-09-2014-0040","title":"Piloting a blended model for sustainable IL programming","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Computer science; Curriculum; Asynchronous communication; Blended learning; Learning Management; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; World Wide Web; Educational technology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0930246152535281,"score_gpt":0.3641634140024235,"score_spread":0.2711387987488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004595673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8617183,0.00020137514,0.093006425,0.0031051557,0.00016213524,0.008979224,0.00022304316,0.0024529684,0.030151429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71740705,0.00034619434,0.25416845,0.0011602402,0.00006426183,0.0053183637,0.0004413361,0.00035431283,0.02073982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317205,0.0032532618,0.00032760904,0.00041327518,0.0022478276,0.0005860052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875938,0.0036365616,0.00071259955,0.0018628252,0.0036282754,0.0025657942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010018558,0.000367351,0.0002961702,0.0010792043,0.0015279911,0.0027690586,0.0019297521,0.0006956139,0.0059581334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01625936,0.00030816352,0.00045608758,0.0006793367,0.00076527003,0.002696343,0.004645476,0.0013782049,0.002562071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061073183,0.0113648875,0.017029725,0.0005440759,0.000036533016,0.0005438544,0.009320042,0.0028220906,0.01094534,0.0033415577,0.007204303,0.9362368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021625992,0.057736393,0.12008535,0.001960447,0.0002873749,0.0031700039,0.04022942,0.06524327,0.1212682,0.013262536,0.57411873,0.00047566043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026148169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046783043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010018558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020649033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086178165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05298382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009092618","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920397","title":"Investigating the efficacy of embedment: experiments in information literacy integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Information literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Medical education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.050569694140247395,"score_gpt":0.35123192074132764,"score_spread":0.3006622266010802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009092618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976191,0.000027583954,0.0012057854,0.000033412252,0.000013038699,0.0004956213,0.00001535672,0.000024968816,0.00056512136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98001754,0.00010113637,0.016391024,0.00011166636,0.00003584937,0.0021653296,0.000054633794,0.000019836154,0.0011030013],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937587,0.0030980206,0.00086890976,0.0009131324,0.00091322995,0.0004479936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594304,0.02860651,0.005350295,0.0036308798,0.0011707564,0.0018112082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006051077,0.0009131713,0.00074275164,0.0005996667,0.0006340185,0.0014349355,0.0015451566,0.0013620218,0.002265225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027052475,0.0008518233,0.0006523308,0.0004688994,0.0017031052,0.0018634356,0.0023021738,0.0020772337,0.00030854568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02722507,0.4460159,0.0353124,0.0025353013,0.00046982648,0.0009177437,0.025651604,0.005794138,0.2945771,0.002173778,0.0005306426,0.15879658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010734396,0.6348132,0.08475679,0.00034124398,0.00072511967,0.0006788668,0.0041175587,0.009986917,0.24723421,0.002024262,0.0043652873,0.00022222394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037175915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037035605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006051077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047197586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073712296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032001555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015077654","doi":"10.1108/00907320911006994","title":"An information literacy program built for relevance and purpose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Relevance (law); Originality; Computer science; Population; Literacy; Information science; Library science; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.02212596230120727,"score_gpt":0.3867751638301707,"score_spread":0.3646492015289634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015077654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74993944,0.004481181,0.07369126,0.010046314,0.0010716078,0.030442612,0.0007069041,0.0043460107,0.12527466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7405587,0.0030613646,0.19935974,0.0049566356,0.00035001515,0.014419757,0.0009050577,0.00018095155,0.036207806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977412,0.0012269773,0.000117391435,0.00017644133,0.00053770194,0.00020023456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943851,0.0018406784,0.0005283811,0.00050618564,0.0013539739,0.0013856628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034387836,0.00024224093,0.00033663542,0.0018272678,0.0014228441,0.001145856,0.0014491198,0.00069580815,0.006338459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012512198,0.0001942565,0.00039205747,0.0011709243,0.00047694918,0.001544905,0.002739438,0.0009892484,0.00096150866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048556106,0.009397612,0.014952026,0.0024808692,0.00004045426,0.00048600396,0.004855655,0.0005068848,0.005402553,0.004304599,0.015964989,0.94112283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040595084,0.048029862,0.2914595,0.0060029128,0.0009375871,0.0032729188,0.009581614,0.0035011272,0.034536924,0.006933128,0.59142673,0.00025822525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003083154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083215255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006338459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016320213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011552213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021204233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020250223","doi":"10.1108/00907320210428697","title":"From the front line: information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Front line; Library science; Academic library; Literacy; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Higher education; Front (military); Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.029360497689889752,"score_gpt":0.293652376689537,"score_spread":0.26429187899964723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020250223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92436373,0.007026539,0.00027333607,0.0042981203,0.00004340076,0.00021378112,0.001230234,0.00004557022,0.06250526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827399,0.005517699,0.0005678889,0.000808128,0.000019978557,0.00006800011,0.00050834764,0.00001650541,0.009753487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942899,0.00045578566,0.00022304073,0.0002678815,0.0038048322,0.00095851853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790885,0.003474324,0.0030008112,0.00033360254,0.011667805,0.002435018],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023369663,0.00027521508,0.000533346,0.0059798453,0.00790095,0.0066490667,0.0013090995,0.0006423408,0.0060694106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024439877,0.0001969877,0.0002909262,0.0126837455,0.0021610989,0.0016750961,0.00274702,0.001032531,0.0005254388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020674693,0.0007101964,0.26361844,0.0025809256,0.00006590966,0.0007211671,0.24222681,0.00026585747,0.001214556,0.006674942,0.017263649,0.46445084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019076091,0.00022670052,0.7377775,0.0015070146,0.00014852319,0.0002032985,0.17818256,0.00017760714,0.0023000177,0.00059950765,0.07876777,0.0000904782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99245536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057387613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14427488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4163782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020336102","doi":"10.1108/00907320610716404","title":"Encouraging students' lifelong learning through graded information literacy assignments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Lifelong learning; Originality; Library instruction; Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.013529696133860533,"score_gpt":0.335272558849813,"score_spread":0.3217428627159525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020336102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775557,0.027818317,0.012153781,0.006461113,0.0004893431,0.0018462605,0.00008805727,0.0005758018,0.073011585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96416837,0.011292648,0.0133897895,0.0016982312,0.00019139877,0.0006980296,0.00006586905,0.00001520829,0.008480437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637455,0.0023339915,0.00022077552,0.00016036339,0.00070196646,0.0002083506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902154,0.005511199,0.0017035702,0.00038953018,0.0013891055,0.00079108163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235525,0.00016714021,0.0003345113,0.0008180462,0.00034412672,0.001058919,0.0010548161,0.00053021836,0.0029547152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017694253,0.00009267247,0.00025408008,0.0005369748,0.000379168,0.00092170667,0.0013618467,0.0005184485,0.00062165107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001721486,0.002950167,0.00814941,0.0038427177,0.000060847775,0.00017952184,0.0028698933,0.00028623122,0.0019055324,0.0016217951,0.0064760083,0.9714857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015162597,0.030940564,0.36890724,0.02006009,0.0012151022,0.0032676428,0.021508563,0.0029662603,0.04078574,0.011551009,0.49706864,0.00021288858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054714305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018217318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003235525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004912803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015812312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017111242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029827368","doi":"10.1108/00907320610716486","title":"The benefits of buy‐in: integrating information literacy into each year of an academic program","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Bachelor; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Library instruction; Medical education; Library science; The arts; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.016416344586107794,"score_gpt":0.3428869113149481,"score_spread":0.3264705667288403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029827368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8711602,0.0051134042,0.005007976,0.03375815,0.0006431304,0.001362211,0.00025374687,0.00075843476,0.081942685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97359776,0.0018040937,0.007825673,0.0027306727,0.00037009883,0.00039631792,0.00019078136,0.000049997016,0.013034619],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942469,0.0029332433,0.0002566453,0.00019439598,0.0011692867,0.0011996205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706886,0.004830822,0.003171259,0.0015450442,0.0046030087,0.015161209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008244819,0.00022953252,0.0003436651,0.0015620072,0.002072405,0.0032441402,0.0012883118,0.0009247657,0.0071613104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031880867,0.00028052533,0.00052933214,0.0018685414,0.000555391,0.0024111038,0.0041395864,0.001160623,0.00084535213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028595695,0.0027263043,0.08643046,0.0007092428,0.000046863937,0.0003206485,0.006295549,0.00034664077,0.0013888553,0.0017433608,0.010858574,0.88884753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001315284,0.0052666506,0.8229732,0.001148763,0.00014622192,0.0011295691,0.02179053,0.00066975737,0.0029181368,0.0017431581,0.14200975,0.00007262123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016120033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0584472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016120033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004750691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015657166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04360324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030160027","doi":"10.1108/00907321011090755","title":"Innovation: the language of learning libraries","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Library instruction; Computer science; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Sociology; Information literacy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.023600973296748717,"score_gpt":0.31864960575938045,"score_spread":0.29504863246263174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030160027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030045314,0.03250241,0.05790756,0.09297189,0.0021763672,0.00015847072,0.00020367747,0.00042135955,0.783613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322111,0.0074160276,0.013555159,0.007533629,0.0017943827,0.0003990383,0.0000884169,0.00017624849,0.036826015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899816,0.0082539655,0.00029750654,0.00046095985,0.0007283452,0.00027754708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879851,0.009134426,0.0008433602,0.00078842405,0.0008130861,0.0004355547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00586352,0.0004002446,0.00040131496,0.001990815,0.003170087,0.011745226,0.0013169699,0.0023654273,0.007770941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011016552,0.00014703024,0.0002844176,0.0028939298,0.029881233,0.009034749,0.0031976735,0.0033512134,0.0014407638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015883175,0.000015901303,0.00024382716,0.00017251114,0.0000027927263,0.000053686093,0.017269263,0.00009200164,0.00006950831,0.96360105,0.0050225495,0.013441065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029680485,0.000071819486,0.00093995593,0.0008461197,0.000012058389,0.00038999776,0.021069814,0.00074653706,0.0005445784,0.43374723,0.5415722,0.00003000038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036367418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025930197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011745226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004368801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004679112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03169799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030269731","doi":"10.1108/00907320410519405","title":"Health professional education, evidence‐based health care, and health sciences librarians","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Critical appraisal; Medical education; Health care; Process (computing); Psychology; Health professionals; MEDLINE; Nursing; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3314651731453244,"score_gpt":0.5719132116442873,"score_spread":0.2404480384989629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030269731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007907883,0.056661583,0.016723499,0.7962879,0.007192495,0.00033352064,0.00006139255,0.0003712493,0.11446046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33784097,0.11354099,0.10339778,0.3294176,0.017862989,0.0014653952,0.00026646536,0.00026686396,0.09594096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9351726,0.03722004,0.0051007583,0.0024900823,0.017334308,0.0026822004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7303453,0.14220884,0.018949365,0.009748435,0.045322828,0.05342525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06772859,0.0005176463,0.0009145095,0.006627487,0.00437802,0.012323679,0.0012818445,0.0060664797,0.019487593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18835543,0.00091406045,0.00048515815,0.005152855,0.010362967,0.009983377,0.009082355,0.00764967,0.004660909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079709724,0.0006407162,0.010094915,0.0028560793,0.000075867276,0.00027455267,0.0066184895,0.00025368057,0.0005515332,0.06896215,0.29169235,0.6179001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000163767,0.00021759444,0.019119618,0.004620704,0.000044626984,0.0008197219,0.006997221,0.0004705013,0.00064836623,0.10246239,0.8643293,0.00010629442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055100815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013073548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06772859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008415727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040703837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35818726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031036176","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774346","title":"Corporate governance research on the free web: a selected annotated guide","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Originality; Quality (philosophy); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics); Web 2.0; World Wide Web; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Public relations; Political science; The Internet; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Geography","score_opus":0.07097836391178541,"score_gpt":0.3116946073943818,"score_spread":0.2407162434825964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031036176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013655269,0.30155668,0.1638695,0.09130368,0.018823884,0.009311841,0.027004011,0.004692016,0.36978304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032538623,0.39193437,0.2065421,0.017907294,0.007864239,0.010304997,0.02434421,0.003648545,0.3049156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952709,0.0018472618,0.00086998637,0.00020998868,0.0016396281,0.00016217632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771887,0.012951258,0.0011786829,0.0011783935,0.0067853266,0.0007177403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049591735,0.0010651626,0.0012323046,0.025573637,0.002078828,0.004728582,0.0011038681,0.0016080721,0.028200632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012508316,0.00085581467,0.0006981142,0.033753965,0.0019497835,0.0061398754,0.0024960544,0.0018010444,0.009847983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030311941,0.00010084833,0.00071045384,0.0043151123,0.0000116118845,0.00042061077,0.0060641873,0.00052227575,0.0016738424,0.010409839,0.57230216,0.4034387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005328867,0.000022098939,0.0015566105,0.003394852,0.0000058038368,0.00017631946,0.001469502,0.00013532709,0.00018164115,0.002433,0.9906034,0.00001606964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016620036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034433812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028200632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030111063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066746767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0943405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032564839","doi":"10.1108/00907320210451367","title":"Problem‐based learning: evolving strategies and conversations for library instruction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Library science; Information literacy; Multimedia; Psychology","score_opus":0.05768089413799968,"score_gpt":0.32529104190649116,"score_spread":0.26761014776849146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032564839","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07890408,0.042275004,0.6076189,0.055931807,0.0016114367,0.002187847,0.00014549227,0.0020772489,0.20924807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35527626,0.021949517,0.57751995,0.00547501,0.00043010968,0.0029741756,0.00029576334,0.00046473226,0.035614535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880932,0.009521557,0.00037092433,0.00052842725,0.0012304231,0.00025541562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864498,0.009899947,0.0006111092,0.00083908765,0.001295149,0.0009048533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011894168,0.00090360653,0.0005575885,0.0035988037,0.0025715309,0.010615898,0.0028674395,0.0026251462,0.0068454603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02722963,0.00038335667,0.0004898165,0.0025046973,0.005891876,0.013359165,0.004551944,0.0027039882,0.002139236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007025917,0.00036422582,0.0017725558,0.0015821595,0.000023869352,0.000384825,0.09725508,0.00056231604,0.0019717098,0.16614677,0.017475005,0.7123913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117145915,0.00044858447,0.0030560188,0.0043552457,0.000058578462,0.002453789,0.08412854,0.0061139613,0.0031929684,0.2527334,0.6431992,0.00014247083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011779424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015115595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011894168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002969242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004815576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062903106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045313458","doi":"10.1108/00907321111161458","title":"Information literacy instruction for satellite university students","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Originality; Distance education; Value (mathematics); Instructional design; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Literacy; Mathematics education; Library science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Multimedia; Psychology","score_opus":0.03947776816642038,"score_gpt":0.3159995709006682,"score_spread":0.2765218027342478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045313458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82498765,0.05921798,0.0013826974,0.0067945616,0.00019154296,0.00024020106,0.0000731095,0.00013138003,0.10698085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94221085,0.034977157,0.0029639252,0.0019055674,0.00017673764,0.00017681804,0.00009804338,0.000014063212,0.017476795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944264,0.00029638718,0.000037686434,0.000024964671,0.0001385729,0.000059799415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983423,0.00079838466,0.00021096862,0.00005897576,0.00031575834,0.00027362624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089494296,0.0001030235,0.00021666964,0.0009156207,0.00055859785,0.0010289581,0.00031142327,0.0005055951,0.006528618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043200627,0.00006440983,0.00019756235,0.00091508613,0.000302582,0.0006286729,0.0013373081,0.00039819867,0.0009461134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014180469,0.00096163445,0.02361704,0.0027666916,0.000031151725,0.00066397875,0.013016591,0.00009875151,0.0031141315,0.0019694413,0.011148082,0.9424707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034055696,0.0091255745,0.30886707,0.01232204,0.000362987,0.0050280998,0.06830407,0.0003825864,0.018660031,0.0026172115,0.5739325,0.00005722796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020775008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007821741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006528618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081401167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027459643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021840394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045424941","doi":"10.1108/rsr-08-2014-0037","title":"Sustainable decision making for emerging educational technologies in libraries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Dilemma; Relevance (law); Emerging technologies; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Originality; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.03393920987175919,"score_gpt":0.31303817338728807,"score_spread":0.2790989635155289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045424941","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03131576,0.17677388,0.29170418,0.26656756,0.0021075802,0.0029738587,0.0003743396,0.00033584482,0.22784708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5716186,0.09851077,0.29575187,0.020928103,0.00079727697,0.0030161028,0.0002993606,0.000116825446,0.008961142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8626841,0.10143408,0.008281884,0.0039969343,0.02123535,0.0023676434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8538994,0.12012611,0.009262495,0.005265193,0.009834491,0.0016122402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090954706,0.0013938507,0.0025306528,0.008942632,0.0044421437,0.034229044,0.0059676105,0.011644408,0.007400309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1074212,0.0012336399,0.0030607602,0.009183813,0.022534998,0.027628716,0.016850157,0.007285359,0.0012723936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055129003,0.00015868139,0.0015083387,0.010134754,0.00031082204,0.0003865623,0.0053556683,0.008278844,0.0003524841,0.77163935,0.0065794033,0.19523993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057603207,0.00011263413,0.0007559317,0.022784077,0.0001968303,0.00019475672,0.012388491,0.0030332853,0.0011002466,0.7905275,0.16874242,0.000106205065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035093531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007328021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090954706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014378977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043942686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4810202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048405300","doi":"10.1108/00907320910957224","title":"The information and learning commons: a selective guide to sources","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Implementation; World Wide Web; Computer science; Originality; The Internet; Service (business); Library science; Index (typography); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.012915423122918702,"score_gpt":0.31480111781894177,"score_spread":0.30188569469602305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048405300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027854296,0.10760687,0.119570196,0.044190794,0.013974772,0.016838778,0.09159344,0.011430205,0.5920094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0103679905,0.17408843,0.32048932,0.021681625,0.006628281,0.030804036,0.068836085,0.012467033,0.3546373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159384,0.0030159885,0.0022498574,0.00041417594,0.0023659056,0.00036026258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95293,0.026161075,0.0027542072,0.004434114,0.012201358,0.0015192997],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105585605,0.0013950983,0.0024345429,0.03541239,0.0035304201,0.010286034,0.0029683246,0.0024253584,0.12568474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04700894,0.0016325846,0.0010868857,0.051426794,0.0025320589,0.015137579,0.0077045485,0.0041163634,0.09521296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041823394,0.000069730755,0.00034197903,0.0039747935,0.000010099009,0.00015121674,0.003550843,0.00016896125,0.00088328565,0.021338448,0.7257003,0.24376856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034942398,0.000006741107,0.00021373614,0.0019820333,0.000001832406,0.00007786456,0.00055484055,0.000037712318,0.00006284455,0.0029167791,0.9941334,0.000008664532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057466356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009485933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98971397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002969314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011683651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42045736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068428412","doi":"10.1108/00907320410519423","title":"Research, development, and production of information resources and tools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Informatics; Medical education; Information literacy; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Health informatics; Relevance (law); Critical appraisal; Professional development; Computer science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Qualitative research; Engineering; Social science; Public health","score_opus":0.28280845920520586,"score_gpt":0.5224971970716938,"score_spread":0.23968873786648798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068428412","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04067952,0.023919282,0.5900462,0.03359369,0.002556712,0.013674843,0.0067391456,0.010467074,0.27832344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11807104,0.009133557,0.8438939,0.0025647846,0.00060000253,0.0057630935,0.0049010897,0.0016886585,0.013383847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9166426,0.049915116,0.007986975,0.004838536,0.017447721,0.0031690614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74079317,0.159964,0.009622627,0.0498753,0.031704698,0.008040212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08635263,0.0017608578,0.0020942579,0.022954056,0.004746671,0.028382398,0.006033714,0.00350902,0.010288117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16813283,0.0015251501,0.002305497,0.025993714,0.00689501,0.025681838,0.011527177,0.003912134,0.009103054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013539134,0.00045735034,0.0052217427,0.0036819081,0.0000917205,0.00038815595,0.010685193,0.0008013234,0.002708382,0.05825845,0.037044153,0.88052624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017681057,0.0007274237,0.012300125,0.018509932,0.0003740582,0.0014365108,0.039774947,0.005698479,0.015412012,0.12056061,0.7847016,0.00032752036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005308387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036119544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08635263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005992844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037101474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45668185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069090196","doi":"10.1108/00907320910957198","title":"Undergraduate research in the public domain: the evaluation of non‐academic sources online","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Domain (mathematical analysis); Relation (database); Public domain; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Order (exchange); Computer science; Knowledge management; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1844319036505071,"score_gpt":0.41668445711245944,"score_spread":0.23225255346195234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069090196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70105094,0.02973749,0.037502162,0.011940657,0.001213195,0.009609858,0.00038754655,0.0003291227,0.20822905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580211,0.005635547,0.02599751,0.0009812163,0.0002388359,0.002745459,0.00024117233,0.00008030691,0.0060588615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6307764,0.29811537,0.017195694,0.0023819646,0.049626693,0.0019039668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51768386,0.27408707,0.030299038,0.031238673,0.13981712,0.0068742684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20201316,0.0004919366,0.0014630166,0.0067516314,0.0022445142,0.009766821,0.0016935759,0.0012587077,0.0043214043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3437218,0.00037225138,0.00066171575,0.0068474994,0.0032032612,0.0068874196,0.0054766815,0.0010012644,0.0008852822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055011874,0.0016053608,0.03773523,0.00817253,0.00032281608,0.0002796694,0.0735728,0.0002505363,0.002311089,0.020943446,0.00834588,0.8459106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006523778,0.013089307,0.25667858,0.035905067,0.0018374638,0.0025510024,0.24011709,0.0034797215,0.03078958,0.026267441,0.38827285,0.00035943472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011709181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035023317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048007932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010413183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069427368","doi":"10.1108/00907320810920315","title":"LOEX‐of‐the‐West 2008: hitting the jackpot in Las Vegas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Las vegas; Originality; Information literacy; Value (mathematics); Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04071542607302502,"score_gpt":0.3055312665478299,"score_spread":0.2648158404748049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069427368","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033811778,0.7348606,0.0006292501,0.1574579,0.018742334,0.00011168722,0.00016390535,0.00008460337,0.05413793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28568164,0.5758955,0.0018042752,0.061134025,0.0046295263,0.0002449852,0.00059768715,0.00011106773,0.06990128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979175,0.001009317,0.000103213686,0.0001174433,0.00062952953,0.00022299578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668807,0.0014508163,0.00029542096,0.000050424063,0.0011734344,0.00034196957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035749634,0.00024011116,0.00047234018,0.0012863734,0.0018366675,0.0037104578,0.0008514476,0.0023270417,0.0053858343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064196205,0.00015206942,0.0002393158,0.0013069598,0.00082195667,0.002221269,0.0015917495,0.0020083867,0.0004081602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021366119,0.00011934016,0.002542644,0.0084016435,0.0000693126,0.0014310369,0.008543783,0.00028292503,0.0020804175,0.016250035,0.5622536,0.39781156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010458949,0.00011744491,0.005249297,0.0037628673,0.000038431677,0.00027574916,0.010115535,0.000034026958,0.00053852535,0.000724232,0.9791158,0.000017600003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042899985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09947665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042899985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027886026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072395974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085300565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071521595","doi":"10.1108/rsr-12-2012-0082","title":"Hearing stories, not keywords: teaching contextual readers' advisory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Narrative; Originality; Cornerstone; Interview; Grounded theory; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Political science; Linguistics; Social science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.059261298734657054,"score_gpt":0.33233338703522214,"score_spread":0.27307208830056506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071521595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045902986,0.13927135,0.0357882,0.04342578,0.0069783493,0.00077166484,0.00024719042,0.00076043303,0.72685397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76086104,0.12538873,0.020031616,0.013575827,0.0032465549,0.0007784939,0.00024808754,0.00022517047,0.075644374],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929889,0.0051185535,0.0002943843,0.00032933214,0.0010231883,0.00024568549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97400576,0.021070644,0.0015073203,0.0011229225,0.001462569,0.00083084626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006251933,0.00029102998,0.00029273357,0.0012273028,0.0014340032,0.0039627915,0.0009489164,0.0013957841,0.019764058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031946804,0.00016518416,0.00034698605,0.0013148542,0.0035482396,0.00514676,0.0029102543,0.00201688,0.0030386106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013164007,0.00012723233,0.001725519,0.010121047,0.00004292001,0.000755584,0.057977222,0.00016419691,0.0011811585,0.10185646,0.07736205,0.7485549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003137794,0.00014299869,0.0021110822,0.008473961,0.000054274937,0.00084405567,0.026070287,0.00009079222,0.0010320216,0.024296038,0.93683416,0.000018953491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012602918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002815767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019764058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014586952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039030618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066117406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081547500","doi":"10.1108/00907320210451303","title":"Investigating the environment: teaching and learning with undergraduates in the sciences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Class (philosophy); Course (navigation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Process (computing); Mathematics education; Course evaluation; Higher education; Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.050188653263054904,"score_gpt":0.2882995171657948,"score_spread":0.23811086390273992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081547500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689614,0.0044190786,0.0012995672,0.006116821,0.00023463236,0.00016979384,0.000028188537,0.000034166147,0.018736402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783699,0.0049472353,0.0042254166,0.0024200107,0.00008471058,0.00012532623,0.000041740146,0.000011448247,0.009774288],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348193,0.0044572456,0.00018791329,0.00032673546,0.0007891928,0.0007568787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897787,0.003506629,0.0009549262,0.000411035,0.0016197216,0.0037289925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746339,0.00023112424,0.00048155285,0.0009100652,0.004110892,0.0056450074,0.00084661413,0.0011571815,0.0025251014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130642485,0.00029453644,0.00029921983,0.00096188753,0.0017248983,0.0018429848,0.004266844,0.0012324038,0.0005835387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017657352,0.005810268,0.10524376,0.0010939161,0.000057323716,0.0018838928,0.36107215,0.00019827585,0.0044855713,0.0046219444,0.014281064,0.50107527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119955985,0.0043296055,0.15369263,0.0012843492,0.00013066354,0.0014810462,0.6313972,0.00034625005,0.0071799294,0.0052461247,0.19471444,0.00007780624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002052075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100192595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008746339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021966728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073953196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046255648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082816247","doi":"10.1108/00907320910982758","title":"Wikipedia: friend or foe?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Computer science; Encyclopedia; Originality; Multidisciplinary approach; Subject (documents); Scopus; Sample (material); Quality (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Data science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Political science; Epistemology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04320511733365887,"score_gpt":0.413290147315561,"score_spread":0.3700850299819021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082816247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7997843,0.03516314,0.034353793,0.017885718,0.0019742202,0.0033744131,0.005762055,0.0008213203,0.10088101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95346427,0.007898391,0.026018532,0.0023345954,0.0007313667,0.001048221,0.001861829,0.00019595407,0.0064469464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560379,0.024956098,0.0043230336,0.0026516998,0.011465912,0.0005653688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60145116,0.23325133,0.055201598,0.016793648,0.08930629,0.003995977],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184757,0.00038675207,0.0010614769,0.009192573,0.0022562975,0.0067228586,0.0013389451,0.000790288,0.0037230013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26853058,0.00024430966,0.0003276424,0.009174251,0.0030596282,0.0066425856,0.002217759,0.00079518603,0.001326242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008910109,0.00036883983,0.26957223,0.013254954,0.00058488734,0.0013706277,0.0428709,0.0007810082,0.003785325,0.015715135,0.047505256,0.6032998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009716732,0.0015023291,0.32143453,0.017521504,0.001131561,0.0066663777,0.12613729,0.0046823868,0.014928289,0.020378333,0.4851693,0.00035089476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003808304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005047262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99327713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001368237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031878976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16842806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087852461","doi":"10.1108/00907320810873020","title":"Creating and evaluating a subject‐based blog: planning, implementation, and assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"RSS; Subject (documents); Originality; World Wide Web; Computer science; Tracking (education); Service (business); Value (mathematics); The Internet; Sociology; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.0816940200753422,"score_gpt":0.3947020829009506,"score_spread":0.3130080628256084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087852461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70940775,0.0038288874,0.06231826,0.0045580766,0.000551441,0.14907229,0.000686069,0.0009810774,0.068596184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6764758,0.0029451242,0.25553176,0.0008151606,0.00015546875,0.056601714,0.00061886624,0.00014519333,0.006710872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8809876,0.092940986,0.0058933357,0.001457824,0.015758755,0.0029615671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8161231,0.07623344,0.0146826785,0.010478742,0.0714604,0.01102166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14821376,0.0007810229,0.0011229572,0.004875707,0.0034168148,0.0089437645,0.0019822735,0.0013144085,0.0030300063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14211108,0.0007094311,0.00082417345,0.0041565676,0.0020126454,0.006622642,0.0036872732,0.0013419054,0.00094720826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012424198,0.008256797,0.110064074,0.006742916,0.00016491511,0.00034363545,0.015103712,0.0034229704,0.0035418773,0.0045194565,0.007266421,0.83933085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029103095,0.06612948,0.4755214,0.013384462,0.001165793,0.00062550965,0.21561216,0.020457458,0.030215159,0.011441464,0.16185072,0.0006861195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008130036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016633399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14821376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107594915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04246434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7838386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088614083","doi":"10.1108/00907321111135493","title":"Library support of bibliographic management tools: a review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Computer science; Originality; Library science; World Wide Web; Process (computing); Service (business); Academic library; Work (physics); Higher education; Digital library; Business; Engineering; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0870317036448305,"score_gpt":0.29705625753422954,"score_spread":0.21002455388939906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088614083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012373338,0.99856263,0.000049444825,0.00029805457,0.00006589277,0.000012487489,0.000018979108,0.00000556475,0.0008631842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014602502,0.9979767,0.00019430873,0.00013610249,0.000051665185,0.000019128449,0.000027468313,0.000001877797,0.00013249958],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554175,0.0013956599,0.0009159043,0.00030362784,0.00169762,0.00014547758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97058576,0.017306488,0.0041915025,0.00042578744,0.006868405,0.00062208803],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007217677,0.00068134157,0.0025021096,0.014301402,0.00065386196,0.0029753156,0.0019116076,0.0014772528,0.0041753664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025598697,0.0007372185,0.0008885949,0.019990897,0.001049843,0.0030203993,0.0011308511,0.0011695927,0.001435677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054859665,0.0000483761,0.00050117204,0.1286743,0.00028912473,0.00009039475,0.00030529633,0.0001189382,0.00023837885,0.0010958083,0.017006665,0.8515767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054421685,0.00024033556,0.005810236,0.1730714,0.0014948021,0.00096082984,0.000782432,0.00011505414,0.0006045026,0.0008017671,0.8160134,0.000050867024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008359707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015687296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99702466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023295747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012146489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038171172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102349715","doi":"10.1108/00907320410569725","title":"Evolving instruction in biology: using the web to improve in‐class instruction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Information literacy; Class (philosophy); Computer science; World Wide Web; Strengths and weaknesses; Web application; Mathematics education; Face (sociological concept); Multimedia; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030604861945999977,"score_gpt":0.3426516212633465,"score_spread":0.3120467593173465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102349715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7630992,0.055128016,0.01690426,0.02840838,0.0011850888,0.0008811406,0.0001288664,0.0014525468,0.13281259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697617,0.041605655,0.06202875,0.005911457,0.0007655884,0.00043964334,0.00021911494,0.00011511222,0.019152965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983985,0.00084773294,0.00008038837,0.00009059657,0.00048167148,0.000101179074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657094,0.0018220057,0.00036305244,0.0001809758,0.0006422227,0.00042082425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024521216,0.00021217323,0.000309256,0.0017749582,0.00050828635,0.0025090098,0.0008350405,0.0009214077,0.003820683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011007921,0.000084759304,0.0002480569,0.0014890572,0.0003332483,0.0020594422,0.0011209245,0.0007607036,0.0007578301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032731765,0.0009744355,0.004377061,0.0005263527,0.000019559016,0.00007639028,0.0008942963,0.00012715011,0.00087944756,0.0008410146,0.0037167622,0.9875349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007242983,0.0070230393,0.37586704,0.0063483915,0.0007735606,0.0029370557,0.01675799,0.0046640355,0.020782176,0.013783739,0.5502214,0.00011727333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031363487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00578239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003820683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078360713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018605723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012968183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124274935","doi":"10.1108/00907321311301306","title":"LOEX‐of‐the‐West 2012: creative landscapes in southern California","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Library science; Dialog box; Theme (computing); Value (mathematics); Session (web analytics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.01714667388032962,"score_gpt":0.27888823211890124,"score_spread":0.2617415582385716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124274935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1842178,0.27738145,0.0023638317,0.22961056,0.010495625,0.00059163314,0.0010198316,0.00049838756,0.29382095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7266201,0.12841111,0.00595387,0.027584111,0.00411027,0.00093537045,0.0016017938,0.0003412171,0.104442194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348396,0.0025285874,0.0002721999,0.00044366455,0.0026965234,0.00057513535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98350346,0.0049974388,0.0016270273,0.0006989873,0.006843955,0.0023292112],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009938647,0.00029072684,0.00042243602,0.0030197361,0.007491581,0.012840619,0.0011021884,0.0015804959,0.009601523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021001384,0.00030266796,0.00025912118,0.004795964,0.003132335,0.0034034874,0.0037793827,0.0021018302,0.000650539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014432757,0.00014020775,0.010863945,0.0032952344,0.00004664875,0.0006612358,0.046691995,0.00022246725,0.0009196882,0.021525498,0.6191596,0.2963291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018769095,0.00006123145,0.025131982,0.0023777473,0.00003360721,0.00020380666,0.04199786,0.000079563244,0.00044339465,0.0013692245,0.9282508,0.00003208071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09541048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26107353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0122349225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024014024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18971026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141680782","doi":"10.1108/rsr-03-2013-0016","title":"Using student questions to direct information literacy workshops","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Library instruction; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Creativity","score_opus":0.03970431801676159,"score_gpt":0.3850476936978899,"score_spread":0.3453433756811283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141680782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6455216,0.0011716981,0.24686618,0.00403198,0.0007581537,0.009453416,0.00063927355,0.0018076657,0.089749984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79876745,0.0010038915,0.16687253,0.0021279214,0.0001562086,0.012207238,0.0006598276,0.00020068276,0.018004294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697114,0.0251451,0.0012687213,0.0012836256,0.0017477347,0.0008434286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94559354,0.04208788,0.0030320531,0.0029463884,0.0050442494,0.0012959257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016856803,0.00092629873,0.0005185671,0.0022546055,0.0011515191,0.0027035847,0.0016546611,0.0016560362,0.0073422254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04491628,0.00044640643,0.0005910061,0.0012794988,0.0014974339,0.003000104,0.0056947586,0.0014958028,0.0021928414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008124889,0.0029262588,0.019072767,0.0027436947,0.000060327846,0.00077597983,0.17727634,0.0010461841,0.012366813,0.01171912,0.011692172,0.7595077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008476554,0.009113433,0.037619524,0.005626088,0.00018889953,0.0021593517,0.21365465,0.0053051603,0.061048105,0.028460655,0.635598,0.00037846385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028008386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079938513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016856803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014378409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020060511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08914834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150851841","doi":"10.1108/00907320710774300","title":"From paper to electronic, the evolution of pathfinders: a review of the literature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.046469909990932604,"score_gpt":0.3946334016620571,"score_spread":0.34816349167112454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150851841","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022010386,0.99789715,0.00014493693,0.0006209041,0.00021324189,0.000012309269,0.000009385282,0.0000067190367,0.000875342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022582188,0.99614644,0.00060832256,0.00040350482,0.00013173242,0.000027775863,0.000016341863,0.0000045848733,0.00040306215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964198,0.00138453,0.00052023417,0.00034379,0.0012283429,0.00010333208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701453,0.008774825,0.0014218369,0.00027776914,0.002159866,0.00035113978],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048761577,0.0007614691,0.0017911794,0.010705442,0.0008045626,0.0036064873,0.0014429601,0.0019979216,0.005836573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015530141,0.0006104317,0.0008133205,0.015178703,0.0017783586,0.0058711246,0.0012385979,0.0020767476,0.0018979161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060677572,0.00008379872,0.0005493236,0.036071792,0.00010145788,0.00018378324,0.0005062052,0.00017258615,0.00025858413,0.003143849,0.017962959,0.94090486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043072127,0.00028087146,0.0062982277,0.105353124,0.00039522778,0.0029889701,0.0023214507,0.00017015224,0.0005002932,0.006037149,0.87554234,0.000069022906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041087135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008608863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023710693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006655145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02578789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164930670","doi":"10.1108/00907320810895387","title":"The role of the library in the first college year: the Canadian perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Library science; Academic library; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Library instruction; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Higher education; Literacy; Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.016584690607980818,"score_gpt":0.2597991099346367,"score_spread":0.24321441932665586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164930670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14576319,0.21467489,0.0007698129,0.19535449,0.0013862171,0.00012475204,0.0010048385,0.00012233667,0.44079947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594867,0.09375021,0.00059973425,0.009540812,0.00025268295,0.000032028605,0.00017557938,0.000042097796,0.03612021],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942062,0.0009183173,0.000099479024,0.00032333046,0.001760302,0.0026923004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369133,0.002181871,0.0010230629,0.00018090951,0.005178167,0.007744676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003926537,0.00042063455,0.00080001954,0.0063715447,0.018040065,0.015776318,0.0025601792,0.0022451237,0.011632823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00992191,0.0002952956,0.00037954046,0.01122756,0.010081541,0.004224954,0.0035383636,0.0028718004,0.0006997308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020238405,0.00027769883,0.041194018,0.004316021,0.000060890507,0.002241976,0.13422468,0.0007309045,0.0011507936,0.25970742,0.1496536,0.40623963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027006172,0.000107742075,0.07576652,0.0039267344,0.000094044495,0.00081384345,0.164494,0.00020990582,0.0006458282,0.0060162456,0.7477389,0.0001592519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13601643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13601643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3278824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98687285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166721722","doi":"10.1108/00907321111108088","title":"Information is social: information literacy in context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Internship; Context (archaeology); Originality; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Information needs; Pedagogy; Computer science; Political science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.060723036006726495,"score_gpt":0.33681415069989795,"score_spread":0.27609111469317144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166721722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048942413,0.35566923,0.008517248,0.17383012,0.0034965074,0.00013111446,0.00020832087,0.00011853782,0.4090866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81098163,0.15687937,0.0031697685,0.016418716,0.0025543403,0.00019335981,0.00012305968,0.000035047196,0.009644748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902802,0.007535245,0.00044786854,0.00047137,0.0007914813,0.0004738101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867899,0.010005006,0.0011366304,0.00063320564,0.0008376713,0.0005976056],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744652,0.00038200174,0.00070703326,0.004721422,0.0033910917,0.012121757,0.00074688793,0.0020870971,0.0057571316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100306785,0.0001978749,0.0003233933,0.006438203,0.025596948,0.015005892,0.006828956,0.0026449263,0.00041250917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024249426,0.00005177391,0.0038489348,0.0031912853,0.00004246963,0.0011715521,0.08483807,0.00021109005,0.00025857694,0.7836268,0.018137882,0.10459736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009739606,0.00006099731,0.005200985,0.008480676,0.00004525471,0.0015199505,0.09736092,0.00009224691,0.00021013817,0.16260487,0.72438735,0.000026930797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005164291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048834286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98787826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036168844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006929727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026242435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176524000","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2015-0024","title":"Digging deeper into virtual reference transcripts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Originality; World Wide Web; Service (business); Content analysis; Software; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.0723355024999818,"score_gpt":0.35135748664004973,"score_spread":0.27902198414006796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176524000","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38583797,0.0034506884,0.4270743,0.03784555,0.0024476384,0.012381267,0.018269243,0.0018204934,0.110872865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68009365,0.0042614928,0.2202948,0.009633523,0.0005666092,0.025411677,0.00927214,0.0022476073,0.048218552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95774555,0.026794346,0.0022882826,0.0027250275,0.008558541,0.001888299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601167,0.095632836,0.008075749,0.008646709,0.026666988,0.000860929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036177285,0.0009797964,0.00086166145,0.0108421715,0.0066594365,0.0057634674,0.0021244325,0.0016837713,0.0115801245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13033317,0.0006013586,0.00066798355,0.012741631,0.005962335,0.006220213,0.006714203,0.0036346673,0.0032402526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007104612,0.000036457535,0.002373815,0.001474509,0.000012306138,0.001149735,0.8783156,0.00031772154,0.006256428,0.021866418,0.015469833,0.0726561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138779205,0.000088451874,0.008356454,0.0030242335,0.000017392542,0.0007677489,0.75148517,0.0018518416,0.003465565,0.01952915,0.21131337,0.000086709304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029080415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05670975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036177285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00891448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01155547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19132608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219759973","doi":"10.1108/rsr-03-2015-0019","title":"The finals stretch: exams week library outreach surveyed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Staffing; Originality; Medical education; Space (punctuation); Library science; Academic library; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Creativity","score_opus":0.12224272285346757,"score_gpt":0.3496362686145142,"score_spread":0.22739354576104662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219759973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59358865,0.25124177,0.0006968739,0.028918186,0.0012307424,0.001862061,0.0035635852,0.00014311835,0.118755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76286167,0.1877524,0.0009615996,0.011166214,0.00049928017,0.0011714206,0.002568888,0.000049530638,0.032968972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944159,0.0019845795,0.00046401608,0.00029692808,0.0019682664,0.0008703223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773401,0.0053763515,0.0041319644,0.0003593343,0.009527239,0.0032649955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008498203,0.00020148714,0.000729275,0.0025720655,0.0017071757,0.002966746,0.0012605884,0.0008220694,0.007957122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023388213,0.00027210065,0.00045793582,0.0050814715,0.0006372759,0.0015802161,0.0021619403,0.000967325,0.0012043902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044580546,0.0005769814,0.08868032,0.020544846,0.00021402346,0.000974971,0.025602056,0.00013993432,0.0011370608,0.001882478,0.074841775,0.7849598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006904996,0.0009790481,0.382771,0.0127746705,0.00028986903,0.00059890834,0.0737858,0.000040763145,0.0013405761,0.0001325488,0.5271709,0.000046868226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07346669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16362679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07346669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008346945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029954443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14607811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486968116","doi":"10.1108/rsr-11-2015-0047","title":"Learning from faculty voices on information literacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Pedagogy; Digital literacy; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Literacy; Originality; Qualitative research; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03436764857811462,"score_gpt":0.3346687161987958,"score_spread":0.30030106762068115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486968116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51361215,0.013583148,0.014414425,0.2532591,0.0034248268,0.00017258964,0.00030518146,0.00033406366,0.20089465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96401036,0.0033786604,0.0014400558,0.018531987,0.0005730389,0.0000871213,0.000082969666,0.0001570352,0.0117388135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623588,0.025080163,0.001478213,0.0018683539,0.005469264,0.0037453168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8878624,0.08322653,0.0067069423,0.0052544437,0.007929324,0.009020367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031276356,0.00044577496,0.00069678726,0.0028871861,0.012656789,0.02307307,0.0019163743,0.003164044,0.009631004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07796086,0.00039751086,0.00047336987,0.0040424005,0.033664443,0.020566352,0.02307786,0.0062822048,0.0012867091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002845592,0.000037293044,0.0044280975,0.0002903473,0.000009546823,0.00050734676,0.9167483,0.000054633572,0.00073601934,0.03628188,0.008387004,0.03249114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054868547,0.00004097163,0.001297143,0.0005401547,0.000009497257,0.00031699685,0.87412083,0.000067218694,0.00056587195,0.010737277,0.11227805,0.000020618754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041417726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047379225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031276356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011443794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017451165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16540718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543284682","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2016-0024","title":"Buy, borrow, or access online?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Reading (process); Purchasing; Replication (statistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Collection development; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Descriptive statistics; Value (mathematics); Mathematics education; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Marketing; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06807597633620646,"score_gpt":0.3179348797922088,"score_spread":0.24985890345600234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543284682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84630984,0.016997596,0.0021857484,0.008171757,0.0004020745,0.0003777944,0.0011051298,0.00014465505,0.12430541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158324,0.023073256,0.0043375203,0.0031110304,0.00038330664,0.00028906445,0.00083543925,0.000046355806,0.052091684],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858725,0.00057587825,0.00012676984,0.0001127495,0.0004589925,0.0001383334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367416,0.002660063,0.0016602349,0.00021981778,0.0010924177,0.0006933411],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015904253,0.00012455997,0.00029796045,0.0006354998,0.00043068518,0.00202742,0.00037412113,0.00025656915,0.015313932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116015775,0.00008568623,0.00015982488,0.0009977791,0.00037206546,0.0011186204,0.0005523186,0.000477384,0.005086816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001759237,0.000658791,0.19550124,0.0017196739,0.00003725646,0.00030188568,0.0045576883,0.00012745833,0.0009688764,0.0018046775,0.023084028,0.7710625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058425132,0.0015078348,0.62324345,0.004099709,0.00015734356,0.0014641779,0.033647448,0.00051080785,0.0030593132,0.0027287558,0.32946026,0.000062525854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021374768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004515737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004105373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012215455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051230192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607703561","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2016-0038","title":"International students and information literacy: a systematic review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Library science; Library instruction; Value (mathematics); Medical education; Literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social science; Medicine; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.08004072114768998,"score_gpt":0.45282564068763526,"score_spread":0.3727849195399453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607703561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072335557,0.99773115,0.00015250899,0.0004063016,0.00014215699,0.0003828038,0.00011525307,0.0000056809404,0.00034088717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009900265,0.9874336,0.00081245136,0.00057545945,0.00010195322,0.00090213626,0.00011773651,0.0000038142882,0.00015253988],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864981,0.004919092,0.0045280275,0.0008086687,0.0028488056,0.00039718614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550453,0.030144773,0.0073888693,0.00067473226,0.006075991,0.00067029154],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014576624,0.0015461043,0.0059265364,0.019316344,0.0009981623,0.0037543774,0.0015779051,0.002288241,0.0041002934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057322778,0.0011978449,0.003662207,0.01988274,0.0014370312,0.004466115,0.0021172552,0.001860658,0.00038998586],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008695926,0.000032133776,0.0012477889,0.91562986,0.0026016277,0.00019181853,0.0008931508,0.00008931576,0.00017602075,0.00060306536,0.0026675253,0.07578075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057113135,0.00010831451,0.0026204654,0.95682096,0.01126931,0.0005315658,0.00093125325,0.00004507124,0.00012523073,0.00036279488,0.027104137,0.000023750647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008181267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026136769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004530055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024664637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07708949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609389044","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2016-0045","title":"Teaching research skills through embedded librarianship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Originality; Grading (engineering); Library instruction; Psychology; Collaborative writing; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Collaborative learning; Medical education; Mathematics education; Engineering; Medicine; Creativity","score_opus":0.17912824585807546,"score_gpt":0.49122803332658654,"score_spread":0.3120997874685111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609389044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6332192,0.008319572,0.16898307,0.010293811,0.0011307346,0.009725201,0.0001973639,0.0025748534,0.16555627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7494334,0.0028140962,0.20881978,0.0048104865,0.00039036517,0.0047060456,0.00013539716,0.00020664747,0.028683817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779033,0.0154339885,0.0011619097,0.0016683276,0.002916659,0.00091574783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94868416,0.030242866,0.003882224,0.0085225245,0.004284969,0.0043832604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017349875,0.0004362741,0.00055842724,0.0017499377,0.0014639595,0.004320544,0.002398137,0.0009465092,0.012339807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034529928,0.00049079914,0.0007232309,0.0014875167,0.0016567222,0.0041126567,0.009052064,0.0018056468,0.0035317168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046934027,0.0065239947,0.007933903,0.0036200609,0.00010408157,0.0007371495,0.043589164,0.0005602202,0.008421772,0.013804574,0.0072506974,0.906985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003515921,0.018168371,0.05115713,0.007842904,0.0006882628,0.0067673693,0.080061615,0.0033406792,0.050575387,0.052040003,0.7256224,0.00021985304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026617647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007772816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017349875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013979852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073663937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091755986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793887798","doi":"10.1108/rsr-05-2017-0016","title":"Seeing through the network","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Terminology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Sociology; Relation (database); Focus group; Work (physics); Service (business); Graduate students; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.07116630000206857,"score_gpt":0.3692765470759677,"score_spread":0.2981102470738991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793887798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049257245,0.016420335,0.029114753,0.10820363,0.003056155,0.00017237537,0.00042694368,0.0005348015,0.7928138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7665667,0.027856044,0.013590174,0.01586307,0.0012944264,0.0002298907,0.00043878006,0.00042085056,0.17374013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947218,0.0033836793,0.00013639453,0.0005967098,0.0007649015,0.00039648218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908552,0.0041058967,0.0010519214,0.0010010222,0.0013933794,0.001592563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041369763,0.000423082,0.00038534126,0.0018677838,0.006046625,0.011646905,0.001196881,0.002044633,0.032477766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154075865,0.00027690086,0.00038969374,0.0017759223,0.0077913324,0.019694753,0.00657845,0.002334234,0.0049479953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008782064,0.000050627565,0.009940249,0.001044463,0.000067273184,0.0014399994,0.24246746,0.00041041643,0.0015872756,0.3285451,0.13508385,0.27927542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049076793,0.00002748726,0.0009873529,0.00042173645,0.00002006905,0.00035376076,0.057485342,0.000109563945,0.0001528194,0.02630882,0.91411346,0.000014621334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012922758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016254928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032477766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030717812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056363842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108648956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803994850","doi":"10.1108/rsr-02-2018-0012","title":"Media literacy and newspapers of record","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Information literacy; Literacy; Originality; Visual literacy; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Media studies; Pedagogy; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03732649619620929,"score_gpt":0.29170745119345787,"score_spread":0.25438095499724855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803994850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16815273,0.63091725,0.006001125,0.023460073,0.0021089409,0.0005924926,0.00093914755,0.000074945914,0.1677532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59502834,0.371409,0.007838771,0.006780123,0.0018218805,0.00036935767,0.000921498,0.000053649997,0.015777418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451786,0.002852642,0.00080133934,0.00029898752,0.0013320529,0.00019715258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94467825,0.034803968,0.010377654,0.0012157904,0.00808849,0.0008357759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048576896,0.000182412,0.00042647897,0.005884803,0.001084684,0.0039927447,0.00056597684,0.00055158103,0.0062860046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041158453,0.00016783556,0.000333281,0.006526264,0.0015313756,0.0032464727,0.0016433767,0.000832616,0.0007633072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002100237,0.00009076996,0.052041836,0.032636423,0.00015942936,0.00096799136,0.017850382,0.00015382083,0.0010018629,0.017830292,0.021155013,0.8559021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025742627,0.00024128535,0.12999089,0.074877895,0.0004396709,0.0049906243,0.041163996,0.00014794644,0.002067231,0.0062296484,0.73976445,0.000060637067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005726542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008971592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062860046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009735697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030817827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025690198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892621043","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2018-0046","title":"An accessibility-first approach to online course readers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Originality; World Wide Web; Reading (process); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Multimedia; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0800041352733582,"score_gpt":0.41022550430704424,"score_spread":0.33022136903368604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892621043","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08273654,0.0006816011,0.61899453,0.007813212,0.00087889045,0.0044051204,0.00059980666,0.009809015,0.27408126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19153449,0.00060103706,0.65555465,0.0021806424,0.00032678785,0.0024626332,0.00052767573,0.0025310821,0.14428107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874371,0.0060939677,0.0006631365,0.002043663,0.003119549,0.0006424336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95981705,0.015390808,0.0021318374,0.009830681,0.009140365,0.003689261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011525428,0.0009926726,0.0007605412,0.003583395,0.0048077535,0.013050914,0.0038329696,0.001973112,0.0442109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048638396,0.00082852633,0.0010507215,0.0020369445,0.0039198566,0.008894911,0.013584118,0.0028719532,0.015560928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027462843,0.0011425344,0.006955196,0.00094437925,0.0000251742,0.0015814767,0.10056527,0.0005678531,0.0117524415,0.039450273,0.03447351,0.80226713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009542136,0.0011248029,0.009497325,0.0012469806,0.00009909315,0.002561126,0.044742685,0.002247277,0.020987442,0.043393847,0.8738389,0.00016507959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028090843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008049174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0442109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045310957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009658455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14790022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892812305","doi":"10.1108/rsr-05-2018-0050","title":"Ask a guybrarian: work experiences of male librarians","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Visibility; Quarter (Canadian coin); Qualitative research; Public relations; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13546040966502612,"score_gpt":0.3277740956670699,"score_spread":0.19231368600204377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892812305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53025347,0.37276602,0.001134677,0.041188348,0.0010237861,0.000089923255,0.00021125653,0.000035877845,0.053296573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86158174,0.120082356,0.0005200558,0.009209123,0.00040213784,0.00007963792,0.000083797015,0.00003022011,0.008010992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867791,0.009955479,0.0006019919,0.0003098206,0.0016984632,0.0006551001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882796,0.0061611943,0.0024762608,0.00033701787,0.0017732347,0.00097277755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008299923,0.00018241565,0.0006826707,0.002211339,0.003814423,0.0035504892,0.00066690025,0.0008416689,0.00533741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01859966,0.0002511262,0.00035040404,0.004067533,0.0025558807,0.0033118892,0.0034893171,0.0008990073,0.00097598205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024187687,0.000089159694,0.05395549,0.007612253,0.000114048744,0.0025758343,0.5665726,0.000045488487,0.0008285476,0.009321854,0.030730654,0.32791218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011514318,0.00019897417,0.04085801,0.0063177263,0.00008691717,0.0028520252,0.71925884,0.000024498073,0.0005896982,0.00080190494,0.22896214,0.000037701324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077215875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021247784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008299923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005810281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04389471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893359417","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2018-0041","title":"Equitable public library services for Canadians with print disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Politics; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Reading (process); Public service; Special collections; Sociology; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.05209398907441835,"score_gpt":0.32691163691158087,"score_spread":0.2748176478371625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893359417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010814448,0.73985255,0.00091287337,0.091548845,0.002237932,0.00020600729,0.00049860205,0.00008405081,0.15384465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1895544,0.7675944,0.0035353948,0.014430628,0.0007963481,0.00014500889,0.00055850006,0.00004856161,0.023336755],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919389,0.0015462186,0.00033616848,0.00025131175,0.0042064586,0.0017209863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797111,0.0021960773,0.0009025731,0.00041609845,0.014647825,0.0021264213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007823151,0.00049564434,0.00057022384,0.0053099534,0.0071805418,0.0055654,0.002700985,0.0018322861,0.010928445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021367885,0.0001970435,0.0005543782,0.010605871,0.003959919,0.0030159159,0.0040588477,0.0017395555,0.00080228306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054739405,0.000050849314,0.0019149627,0.011234442,0.000071389826,0.00039267438,0.0073690237,0.00025414792,0.00031029555,0.057812404,0.26575232,0.6547827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017885759,0.000026399199,0.0042215064,0.010081107,0.00009015727,0.00028695757,0.010910811,0.0000540217,0.00018163476,0.0018128537,0.97228694,0.000029706398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94275725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05724275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053458378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28047058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38786948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899412640","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2018-0060","title":"Let’s chat: the art of virtual reference instruction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Library instruction; Computer science; Originality; Digital reference; Promotion (chess); World Wide Web; Literacy; Library science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Service (business); Political science","score_opus":0.03496624989219526,"score_gpt":0.3246308900167173,"score_spread":0.28966464012452203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899412640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23743042,0.2178599,0.057404775,0.056029264,0.0030874275,0.00085871917,0.00047763137,0.0015921713,0.42525965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000922,0.049890127,0.02204449,0.005572582,0.0005651144,0.00060390116,0.00015060499,0.00028183925,0.020799134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980626,0.0142203,0.00045952306,0.00068731204,0.003218921,0.0007879561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98076195,0.013336369,0.001127092,0.0016024183,0.0021499076,0.0010223846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011402149,0.0003679412,0.00051687815,0.0038372872,0.004246183,0.008004384,0.0021274702,0.0011738401,0.0060068774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029901247,0.00024081708,0.00032058544,0.0033161067,0.010891426,0.0057867253,0.0043766773,0.0018531776,0.0009370352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000200151,0.0001111567,0.0039381445,0.0040045013,0.00006721196,0.0004189895,0.1406366,0.00045054013,0.0014058268,0.05859193,0.023981232,0.76619375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045834055,0.00034630322,0.015180167,0.011015616,0.00011187075,0.0012466529,0.12057858,0.00074210396,0.0017385716,0.016365519,0.8325209,0.00010790256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060358535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09560153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060358535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074824607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011123854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12001437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973744457","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2019-0041","title":"Developing and assessing a graduate student reference service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Originality; Medical education; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Reference model; Graduate education; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12589966863220195,"score_gpt":0.40746059545154356,"score_spread":0.28156092681934164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973744457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8344222,0.048572212,0.029007146,0.016453853,0.0015096836,0.0067840745,0.0006257058,0.0007695616,0.06185561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89300066,0.027183698,0.059846256,0.0027985126,0.00032590886,0.0039545395,0.0009308269,0.0001049673,0.011854538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.970713,0.016913122,0.002239034,0.0008152726,0.008176436,0.0011431288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291846,0.012254385,0.0062441393,0.0018091049,0.045723215,0.0047844416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050019283,0.0003172298,0.00097041513,0.004132343,0.0015334353,0.0038109894,0.0023452712,0.0012813677,0.0032571957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087327585,0.000396081,0.0006125523,0.0039145374,0.0010424192,0.0022531182,0.0042085918,0.0013278143,0.001597888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015949295,0.0005056947,0.06773923,0.0072432416,0.00008982899,0.00027888443,0.043156426,0.00024345946,0.0017378957,0.0034543085,0.019983923,0.85540766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012918901,0.006689531,0.25978938,0.018968428,0.00041339739,0.0017202795,0.18066348,0.0013197766,0.008608787,0.0019697556,0.51958454,0.00014347212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055667064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010642936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050019283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005629419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020594329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26453042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981042366","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2019-0044","title":"What citation patterns reveal about reading research and practice in academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scope (computer science); Citation; Discipline; Originality; Thematic analysis; Sociology; Library science; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12799434208069152,"score_gpt":0.44683428601964575,"score_spread":0.3188399439389542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981042366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536976,0.009216714,0.0032479563,0.010981713,0.00016141948,0.000066462395,0.0006549608,0.00007561879,0.021897383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384296,0.002828226,0.0013013898,0.00040617867,0.0001278585,0.00007112544,0.00028074396,0.000042213265,0.0010993134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742968,0.011379807,0.004596854,0.0018830786,0.00662814,0.0012153478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7193363,0.21422893,0.038055785,0.00995473,0.016147405,0.0022769496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022590233,0.00018092888,0.0008567913,0.033690464,0.00392882,0.012501208,0.0010769884,0.0015597637,0.0022341986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16478683,0.00029901537,0.00037682214,0.054431375,0.005882547,0.016518753,0.004039165,0.001000624,0.0004724069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105793806,0.000037989492,0.18045858,0.0013565908,0.00008601534,0.00045417825,0.66648096,0.00010737837,0.0009362275,0.01783381,0.0029387688,0.12920368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009626734,0.000073592804,0.2483861,0.0016361388,0.000085995795,0.0009323382,0.69424695,0.00041961335,0.0005598541,0.017350884,0.036214925,0.000083964784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00482826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008132236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044258074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004702102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999155062","doi":"10.1108/rsr-09-2019-0064","title":"Fake or for real? A fake news workshop","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Variety (cybernetics); Institution; Value (mathematics); Digital literacy; Library instruction; Sociology; Literacy; Digital media; Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.20626752393305614,"score_gpt":0.42557501555494,"score_spread":0.21930749162188384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999155062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.789502,0.029491168,0.008103967,0.03777585,0.004742501,0.002042506,0.00027421876,0.00037495347,0.12769276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95004517,0.014427028,0.006801879,0.0061361953,0.0008700557,0.0010688618,0.00012114107,0.00007960339,0.02045014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855887,0.0114460755,0.0005989801,0.00033185777,0.0013188601,0.00071548985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94024676,0.04714217,0.004554808,0.0024958216,0.003469189,0.0020912199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015112797,0.00041724258,0.00048788902,0.0014317716,0.0044242553,0.005510348,0.0011346408,0.002190091,0.007967586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043769706,0.00029687386,0.00057505054,0.0010558682,0.002708972,0.0045091463,0.0040500215,0.0018996376,0.0019840403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010466066,0.001686627,0.019369077,0.012557697,0.00020772306,0.005894803,0.27664244,0.00044291015,0.0036767547,0.014629654,0.09070922,0.57313645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015471973,0.0023537118,0.01727676,0.007913122,0.0002288348,0.004172211,0.40361243,0.0004796572,0.0064770496,0.003011714,0.55419403,0.0001258358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064698316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019462752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015112797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001795291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002279903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07992512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186959788","doi":"10.1108/rsr-04-2021-0014","title":"Is the library open? How the pandemic has changed the provision of virtual reference services","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Reference desk; Pandemic; Desk; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Value (mathematics); World Wide Web; Computer science; Service (business); Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Business; Marketing; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.08322478144155697,"score_gpt":0.283934686088478,"score_spread":0.200709904646921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186959788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3229848,0.15217213,0.0012785986,0.39235756,0.0030123456,0.00027654122,0.00082556496,0.00014576841,0.12694661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91336966,0.057223238,0.0007403908,0.019958355,0.00045216386,0.000083285144,0.00020878662,0.000060874285,0.007903351],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97770256,0.010381398,0.00071336044,0.0006844323,0.0067684595,0.0037497343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506122,0.017477764,0.0051684864,0.00095827796,0.021104405,0.004678927],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018498076,0.0002260627,0.00061884255,0.0024627422,0.008050666,0.011399892,0.0024211097,0.001942352,0.0057630436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07232243,0.00024674047,0.00041457135,0.005553747,0.008759777,0.0067971675,0.0031743706,0.0030486565,0.00066034327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038816073,0.0001439096,0.049592976,0.010598852,0.0001264277,0.0025186576,0.26522124,0.0008249336,0.0014952918,0.043845713,0.1367946,0.4884493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026810425,0.00013963644,0.09210953,0.0078468835,0.00014537544,0.000849588,0.42171755,0.00029898097,0.00072212296,0.0017659302,0.4742232,0.00015430526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82796144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8706357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98860013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062704824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10218181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4549575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200315670","doi":"10.1108/rsr-07-2021-0036","title":"Library response to Black Liberation Collective: a review of student calls for change and implications for anti-racist initiatives in academic libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Solidarity; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Political science; White (mutation); Media studies; Public relations; Library science; Gender studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.25644081615457043,"score_gpt":0.48180599335213536,"score_spread":0.22536517719756494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200315670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008772833,0.93529654,0.00031083476,0.046878595,0.0018432873,0.0000701278,0.00009435709,0.000033251556,0.0067001884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073684245,0.9040223,0.0006327493,0.018710034,0.0011882824,0.0001567237,0.000119005876,0.000056236862,0.001430441],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97009283,0.017950669,0.0040032775,0.0011413313,0.005393075,0.0014188616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81612116,0.13979599,0.013458552,0.0020853472,0.024251964,0.004287081],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034015622,0.00043492208,0.0012100321,0.010238913,0.0043022423,0.017299859,0.0021654128,0.0044254065,0.0044928486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093616135,0.000796916,0.001021599,0.018862763,0.008776553,0.012183701,0.0054191994,0.0048202244,0.0010448059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022217882,0.00019539919,0.007398778,0.087927215,0.00019402322,0.00045768917,0.09626274,0.00019561118,0.00026700873,0.016569315,0.07547028,0.7148398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023658427,0.00020711283,0.016064115,0.15021627,0.00017310733,0.00064767926,0.14104715,0.00007030911,0.0002768686,0.0015731547,0.689608,0.00009258879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010215986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030350672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98270017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012107775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03298883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17989397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205266038","doi":"10.1108/rsr-06-2021-0024","title":"Not a token! A discussion on racial capitalism and its impact on academic librarians and libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Sociology; Meritocracy; Context (archaeology); Tokenism; Value (mathematics); Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05094248514636049,"score_gpt":0.3642736036645187,"score_spread":0.3133311185181582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205266038","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010251983,0.71412855,0.00088440673,0.24428399,0.0023915973,0.000010826506,0.000017060267,0.000014685244,0.028017022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38206878,0.53534156,0.0009460736,0.070802115,0.004272264,0.00007508934,0.0000233332,0.000035724574,0.0064350613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98164546,0.0139916465,0.00053005683,0.0007528567,0.0021373047,0.000942605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97485876,0.01889869,0.0020113564,0.00053657533,0.0026184795,0.0010760565],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017870937,0.00028133258,0.0007662446,0.003736968,0.0056712306,0.011421699,0.0014514426,0.00405736,0.0055085425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022835737,0.00023156649,0.0005617073,0.0065412945,0.017768601,0.012698605,0.0061185462,0.0052341246,0.0006413779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000757768,0.00005262037,0.0016706038,0.0051482418,0.000060790546,0.00039375617,0.05713805,0.0001755336,0.00027320406,0.6698361,0.042365674,0.2228096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001545589,0.00007235962,0.004229457,0.014359617,0.000071312075,0.0004463964,0.06225398,0.00009067684,0.00039356048,0.044955783,0.873071,0.000040481937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013735059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017523976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075509166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016643768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09451163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389057078","doi":"10.1108/rsr-05-2023-0050","title":"Exploring an automated method for the analysis of virtual reference interactions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Originality; Implementation; Computer science; Expression (computer science); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Multimedia; Software engineering; Qualitative research; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.31691484051062196,"score_gpt":0.5194319308559903,"score_spread":0.2025170903453683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389057078","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024859246,0.00044676344,0.9598368,0.00093583815,0.00023476125,0.0030868172,0.00080049265,0.0020919342,0.0077072578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10379263,0.00026660447,0.8833597,0.00025557025,0.00007249442,0.00812783,0.00063812156,0.00055774214,0.0029292644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8627224,0.096769676,0.008011641,0.010728354,0.020439574,0.0013283868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68782204,0.17888965,0.027486982,0.045226358,0.058966585,0.0016084984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06225205,0.0013193864,0.0009782545,0.013029091,0.0028510604,0.0058800904,0.0030014168,0.001068631,0.004917041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19902153,0.0009026303,0.0010246949,0.008797988,0.003767133,0.0060252915,0.006323859,0.0020532962,0.0028762193],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003968322,0.0002039414,0.012339333,0.0034700055,0.00016128477,0.00062457024,0.115083635,0.0016543113,0.032820918,0.041989334,0.01158563,0.77967024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041817827,0.0016058029,0.056249645,0.008790802,0.00047167225,0.0035155118,0.1716948,0.09618111,0.10255215,0.150178,0.40716827,0.0011739681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003592075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005945805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06225205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002930724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073651876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32922423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399285680","doi":"10.1108/rsr-01-2024-0001","title":"Campus entrepreneurs’ research habits and needs: a five-year study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Toronto; McMaster University","keywords":"Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05593172446147725,"score_gpt":0.33452488831717786,"score_spread":0.2785931638557006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399285680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.000048610844,0.00004212032,0.00013111054,0.0000040699374,0.000034965527,0.000050784765,0.0000022491577,0.00036810525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983071,0.00019309197,0.00022346996,0.00015171173,0.0000065455115,0.00010359753,0.00014979631,0.000002898291,0.00086181605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831945,0.0004345433,0.00018039218,0.00014379143,0.00045600435,0.0004657383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369025,0.0007350716,0.0013179217,0.00025516533,0.0012844224,0.0027170703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063235415,0.0002165969,0.0004203816,0.0023237593,0.0038500638,0.0032333834,0.0005914766,0.000636925,0.001477383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007517999,0.00056034187,0.00043212308,0.0013739713,0.00086067844,0.0028631778,0.0037312803,0.0014909422,0.0006048702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008358049,0.0013520673,0.856643,0.00006512553,0.000016571847,0.00045841577,0.11453298,0.000041071922,0.00038874085,0.00024724792,0.0008038111,0.025367491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008312625,0.0009116856,0.72144496,0.00010737202,0.000014056984,0.00038679646,0.27082038,0.00024970647,0.00021966061,0.00013323699,0.005669916,0.00003386139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008435107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016242908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015500151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027018776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033442497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399352353","doi":"10.1108/rsr-12-2023-0082","title":"Affective dimensions of academic librarians’ experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic: experiences and lessons learned for information literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Psychology; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Virology","score_opus":0.11440121840779495,"score_gpt":0.425042215364754,"score_spread":0.31064099695695907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399352353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938356,0.045789193,0.0015872407,0.02577439,0.00048541013,0.000121247496,0.0001185127,0.000049345286,0.032239012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97860193,0.014328195,0.00039318303,0.003886974,0.00017098902,0.00009095225,0.000040477615,0.00002623462,0.0024610138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810306,0.015070523,0.00071230007,0.00034205324,0.0013923954,0.001452117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741529,0.017879022,0.0026604973,0.0006336391,0.0026303064,0.0020436856],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014188704,0.00028300565,0.00096241833,0.0019345906,0.006589528,0.008904955,0.0008773095,0.0013752242,0.002690244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022914024,0.00035525163,0.00058555644,0.0037765831,0.009386151,0.005617932,0.006965019,0.00220605,0.00050346967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057019945,0.00003482878,0.008339475,0.00095393904,0.000026633725,0.0009048716,0.9612584,0.000020256633,0.00023791417,0.0012943405,0.0026132273,0.024259139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004513466,0.000034002904,0.0067020953,0.0005690351,0.00001377507,0.00038585588,0.9647365,0.000007765988,0.00013133396,0.00028847257,0.027110405,0.000016141345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010058525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023792002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99109507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005215057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008105487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075037956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404280147","doi":"10.1108/rsr-08-2024-0042","title":"From hype to strategy: navigating the reality of experimental strategic adoption of AI technologies in libraries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07332867514545657,"score_gpt":0.3843678869492528,"score_spread":0.31103921180379623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404280147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7697016,0.003991099,0.05755528,0.06520905,0.00033663693,0.0012400218,0.00014278409,0.0003865914,0.101436906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861655,0.00067986053,0.00862412,0.0022847229,0.000037308764,0.00076967204,0.000023413719,0.00006471391,0.001350756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.82627565,0.1581041,0.0018061764,0.003477942,0.006736944,0.0035991636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69444454,0.26835537,0.0118045695,0.01445984,0.0061636865,0.004772091],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093339935,0.0008169599,0.0008799864,0.0035189397,0.015075446,0.027501697,0.0050767125,0.005076045,0.005243232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13392018,0.0010117438,0.0008218051,0.0036590241,0.0913347,0.025238119,0.020657623,0.0063408776,0.00061409577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042788766,0.00076917605,0.010041926,0.0011940359,0.00008609332,0.0013844582,0.54228216,0.0013088593,0.0018322968,0.3912003,0.002935295,0.046537474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002469476,0.0011908445,0.005281791,0.001680071,0.00010837752,0.00049750716,0.72649336,0.0027498915,0.004751162,0.17041564,0.0864338,0.00015066833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008488493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128850425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026524983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021117674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49363464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}